QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.           )

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Hecla Mining Company

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
         
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        

    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        

    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        

    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        

    (5)   Total fee paid:
        


o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        

    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        

    (3)   Filing Party:
        

    (4)   Date Filed:
        


 

 

 

 

Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.

GRAPHIC

April 2, 2004

Dear Shareholder:

        You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Hecla Mining Company, which will be held at Red Lion Templin's Resort located at 414 E. 1st Avenue, Post Falls, Idaho, on Friday, May 7, 2004, at 10 a.m., Pacific Daylight Time. Driving directions to Red Lion Templin's Resort can be found on the inside front cover of this document.

        Shareholders will be asked to vote on the election of three directors and an amendment to the existing 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. In addition, reports of the Corporation's operations and other matters of interest will be made at the meeting. For information with respect to these matters, please refer to the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement.

        It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting whether or not you are personally able to attend. You may vote over the Internet, by telephone or by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card. Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by written proxy will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders if you do not attend in person. Please review the instructions on the proxy card regarding each of these voting options.

    Sincerely,

 

 

GRAPHIC

 

 

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer


GRAPHIC


DRIVING DIRECTIONS


HECLA MINING COMPANY
6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815-9408


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
to be held on
May 7, 2004

To the Shareholders of
HECLA MINING COMPANY:

        NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Hecla Mining Company (the "Corporation") will be held at Red Lion Templin's Resort located at 414 E. 1st Avenue in Post Falls, Idaho, on Friday, May 7, 2004, at 10 a.m., Pacific Daylight Time, for the following purposes:

        The close of business on March 11, 2004, has been fixed as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and at any postponements or adjournments thereof.

    By Order of the Board of Directors

 

 

Michael B. White
Corporate Secretary

April 2, 2004

 

 


        Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, please complete, sign and date the accompanying proxy card and mail it immediately in the enclosed envelope, which requires no additional postage if mailed in the United States. You may also vote over the Internet or by telephone. Please review the instructions on the proxy card regarding these voting options. Your proxy is revocable, either in writing or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, at any time prior to its being voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.



HECLA MINING COMPANY
6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815-9408
208-769-4100


PROXY STATEMENT
Relating to
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
to be held on May 7, 2004



INTRODUCTION

        This Proxy Statement is being furnished by the Board of Directors of Hecla Mining Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), to holders of shares of the Corporation's common stock, par value $0.25 per share (the "Common Stock"), in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation to be held on Friday, May 7, 2004, and any postponements or adjournments thereof (the "Annual Meeting"), for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This Proxy Statement is first being mailed to shareholders on or about April 2, 2004.


PURPOSES OF ANNUAL MEETING

Election of Directors

        At the Annual Meeting, shareholders entitled to vote will be asked to consider and to take action on the election of three directors to the Corporation's Board of Directors, each to serve for a three-year term. See "Election of Directors."

Amendment to 1995 Stock Incentive Plan

        At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will be asked to consider and take action on a proposed amendment to the Corporation's 1995 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the plan from 6,000,000 to 11,000,000. See "Amendment to the Corporation's 1995 Stock Incentive Plan."


VOTING AT ANNUAL MEETING

General Information About Voting

        Who can vote.    The Corporation's Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 11, 2004, as the record date (the "Record Date") for determination of the shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. You will be entitled to vote your shares of the Corporation's Common Stock at the Annual Meeting if you were a shareholder of record on the Record Date. Shareholders of record on the Record Date of the shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting are entitled to cast one vote per share on each matter submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, 117,947,242 shares of Common Stock (which number does not include shares held by us as treasury shares) were outstanding and entitled to one vote each at the Annual Meeting.

        How to vote your shares.    You can vote your shares either by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person, by Internet, by telephone or by returning the enclosed proxy card. If you choose to

1



vote by proxy, please complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card. The proxies named in the enclosed proxy card (Arthur Brown and Michael B. White) will vote your shares as you have instructed. You may authorize the proxies to vote your shares in favor of each of the proposals contained in this Proxy Statement by simply signing and returning the enclosed proxy card without indicating how your votes should be cast. If you vote by Internet or by telephone, please follow the directions on the proxy card regarding each of these voting options.

        Quorum.    A quorum of shareholders is required in order to transact business at the Annual Meeting. A majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote must be present at the meeting, either in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum. Under Delaware law an abstaining vote or a broker "non-vote" is counted as present and is, therefore, included for purposes of determining whether a quorum of shares is present at a meeting.

        Number of votes required.    The number of votes required to approve each of the proposals that are scheduled to be presented at the meeting is as follows:

 
  Proposal
  Required Vote

1.

 

Election of three directors

 

For each nominee, a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting.

2.

 

Amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan

 

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the amendment, provided that the total number of votes cast on the proposal is greater than 50% of the total number of shares entitled to vote on the proposal.

        Plurality.    Plurality means that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast are elected as directors up to the maximum number of directors to be chosen at the meeting.

        Abstentions and broker non-votes.    An abstention occurs when a shareholder attends a meeting by person or proxy, but abstains from voting or does not vote. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker cannot vote a customer's shares registered in the broker's name because the customer did not send the broker instructions on how to vote on the matter. If the broker does not have instructions and is barred by law or applicable rules from exercising its discretionary voting authority in the particular matter, then the shares will not be voted on the matter, resulting in a "broker non-vote." Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as votes in the election of directors or in the vote on amending the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the voting on these matters at the Annual Meeting, and therefore cannot be counted toward the requirements that 50% of the shares entitled to vote on the proposal for the amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan cast a vote.

        Discretionary voting by proxies on other matters.    Aside from the election of directors and the amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, we do not know of any other proposal that may be presented at the Annual Meeting. However, if another matter is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy card will exercise their discretion in voting on the matter.

        How you may revoke your proxy.    You may revoke the authority granted by your executed proxy card at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by notifying our Corporate Secretary in writing; by executing a new proxy card bearing a later date and delivering the new executed proxy card to our Corporate Secretary; or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

2



        Expenses of solicitation.    The Corporation will bear all the costs and expenses relating to the solicitation of proxies, including the costs of preparing, printing and mailing this Proxy Statement and accompanying material to shareholders. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of the mail, the directors, officers and employees of the Corporation, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies personally or by telephone or otherwise. Arrangements will be made with brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of the shares of Common Stock held by such persons, and the Corporation will reimburse such brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with such activities.

        Shareholders sharing the same surname and address.    In some cases, shareholders holding their shares in a brokerage or bank account who share the same surname and address and have not given contrary instructions, receive only one copy of our annual report and Proxy Statement. This practice is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and save significant printing and postage costs as well as natural resources. If you would like to have additional copies of our annual report and/or Proxy Statement mailed to you, please call or write us at our corporate offices, 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815-9408, Attn: Investor Relations, telephone: (208) 769-4100. If you want to receive separate copies of the Proxy Statement or annual report to shareholders in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy per household, you should contact your bank, broker or other nominee record holder.

Proxies

        Shares of Common Stock which are entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting and which are represented by properly executed proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated in such proxies. If no instructions are indicated on any proxy, the shares represented by such proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors. The recommendations of the Board of Directors is to vote: (1) FOR the election of three nominees for election as directors; (2) FOR the approval of the amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan; and (3) in the discretion of the proxy holders as to any other matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting.


ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

        In accordance with the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation, its Board of Directors is divided into three classes. The terms of office of the directors in each of such classes expire at different times. There are three directors whose terms will expire at the Annual Meeting, namely Messrs. Ted Crumley, Charles L. McAlpine and Jorge E. Ordoñez C. The terms of Messrs. Phillips S. Baker, Jr., David J. Christensen and Dr. Anthony P. Taylor will expire in 2005. The terms of Messrs. Arthur Brown, John E. Clute and Joe Coors, Jr. will expire in 2006.

        It is intended that the proxies solicited hereby will be voted FOR the election of the directors listed below, unless authority to do so has been withheld. The Board of Directors knows of no reason why any of its nominees will be unable or unwilling to accept election. However, if any nominee becomes unable to accept election, the Board of Directors will either reduce the number of directors to be elected or select substitute nominees submitted by the Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors. If substitute nominees are selected, proxies will be voted in favor of such nominees, unless authority to do so has been withheld.

3



Nominees

        Each of the nominees below currently serves on the Board of Directors. If elected, the nominees will each serve for a three-year term ending in 2007. The nominees are as follows:

Principal Occupation and Other Directorships

  Age at
May 7, 2004

  Year First
Became
Director

TED CRUMLEY. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Boise (manufacturer of paper and forest products) since 1994; Vice President and Controller of Boise from 1990 to 1994; other positions held at Boise from 1972 to 1990   59   1995

CHARLES L. McALPINE. Former President of Arimathaea Resources Inc. (a Canadian gold exploration company) from 1982 to 1992; former President of Campbell Chibougamau Mines Ltd. (a Canadian copper-gold mining company) from 1969 to 1979; Director, First Tiffany Resource Corporation; Director, Goldstake Explorations Inc.; Director, Postec Systems Inc.

 

70

 

1989

JORGE E. ORDOÑEZ C. President and Chief Executive Officer, Ordoñez Profesional S.C. since 1988; Director, Fischer-Watt Gold Co., Inc. since 1996; Vice President, Minera Montoro, S.A. de C.V. since 1996; former Chief Executive Officer, Empresas Frisco, S.A. de C.V. from 1981 to 1988; former Chief Executive Officer, Minera Real de Angeles, S.A. de C.V. from 1979 to 1980; former Chief Executive Officer, Alfa Industrias-Div. Minas from 1978 to 1979; recipient of Mexican National Geology Recognition in 1989; elected to Mexican Academy of Engineering in 1990

 

64

 

1994

Remaining Directors

        The remaining directors are currently serving terms of office that will continue following the Annual Meeting.

        The following directors are serving terms of office that will expire in 2005:

Principal Occupation and Other Directorships

  Age at
May 7, 2004

  Year First
Became
Director

PHILLIPS S. BAKER, JR. Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation since May 2003; President of the Corporation since November 2001; Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation from May 2001 to June 2003; Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation from November 2001 to May 2003; Vice President of the Corporation from May 2001 to November 2001; Director, Questar Corporation (a Utah natural gas and exploration and production company) since February 2004; Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Battle Mountain Gold Company from March 1998 to January 2001; Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pegasus Gold Corporation from January 1994 to January 1998   44   2001
         

4



DR. ANTHONY P. TAYLOR. President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Gold Summit Corporation since October 2003; Director, Vergene Capital Corporation since December 2003; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Millennium Mining Corporation from January 2000 to October 2003; Vice President of Exploration, First Point US Minerals from 1997 to 1999; President and Director, Great Basin Exploration & Mining Co., Inc., from 1990 to 1996; President and Director, Caughlin Preschool Co., since October 2001; various exploration and geologist positions in the mining industry from 1964 to 1990

 

62

 

2002

DAVID J. CHRISTENSEN. Research analyst with Credit Suisse Boston from October 2002 to August 2003; Global Coordinator and First Vice President of Merrill Lynch & Co. from 1998 to 2001; Vice President and Precious Metals Equity Analyst with Merrill Lynch & Co. from 1994 to 1998; Portfolio Manager of Franklin Gold Fund and Valuemark Precious Metals Funds for Franklin Templeton Group from 1990 to 1994. Mr. Christensen had previously served as a director from May 2002 to October 2002 when he was elected to the Board of Directors by preferred shareholders in May 2002

 

41

 

2003

        The following directors are serving terms of office that will expire in 2006:

Principal Occupation and Other Directorships

  Age at
May 7, 2004

  Year First
Became
Director

ARTHUR BROWN. Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Corporation since June 1987; Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation from May 1987 to May 2003; President of the Corporation from May 1986 to November 2001; Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation from May 1986 to May 1987; Executive Vice President of the Corporation from May 1985 to May 1986; held various positions as an officer of the Corporation since 1980; employed by the Corporation since 1967; Director, AMCOL International Corporation (an American industrial minerals company); Director, Idaho Independent Bank; Director, Tango Minerals Company (a Canadian mining company)   63   1983

JOHN E. CLUTE. Professor of Law, Gonzaga University School of Law since 2001; Dean, Gonzaga University School of Law from 1991 to 2001; Senior Vice President, Human Resources and General Counsel of Boise (manufacturer of paper and forest products) from 1982 to 1991; employed by Boise in various other capacities from 1965 to 1982; Director, The Jundt Growth Fund, Inc.; Director, Jundt Funds, Inc. (Jundt U.S. Emerging Growth Fund, Jundt Opportunity Fund, Jundt Mid-Cap Growth Fund, Jundt Science & Technology Fund and Jundt Twenty-Five Fund); Director, American Eagle Funds, Inc. (American Eagle Capital Appreciation Fund, American Eagle Large-Cap Growth Fund and American Eagle Twenty Fund); Director, RealResume, Inc. (computerized employment and personnel services)

 

69

 

1981

JOE COORS, JR. Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, CoorsTek, Inc. (formerly Coors Ceramics Company) from 1993 to 2000; Director, Fellowship of Christian Athletes for the state of Colorado; Retired Chairman of the Air Force Memorial Foundation

 

62

 

1990

5



CERTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

        The Board of Directors has determined that a majority of the Corporation's directors, as well as each of the members of the Board of Director's Audit, Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committees, are "independent" as defined in the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Board of Directors has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent under the requirements for Audit Committees under Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

        It is the Corporation's policy that all directors are expected, absent compelling circumstances, to prepare for, attend and participate in all board and applicable committee meetings and each annual meeting of the shareholders. Our Board of Directors held four meetings during fiscal year 2003. Each of our directors attended all of the meetings of our Board of Directors and all of the meetings of the committees of the board upon which each served during our fiscal year 2003, except Mr. Jorge E. Ordoñez C., who did not attend two meetings of the Board of Directors, one of which was the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2003.

        The standing committees of the Board of Directors are the Executive, Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating, Technical and Finance.

        The Board of Directors has adopted charters for the Audit, Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committees. Copies of the Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee and Audit Committee charters are included in this Proxy Statement as Appendices A and B, respectively. Copies of these charters are also available at no charge on the Corporation's website at www.hecla-mining.com under "Investor Relations-Corporate Governance" or by writing to us at Hecla Mining Company, 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815-9408, Attention: Investor Relations.

        The Executive Committee, the members of which are Messrs. Brown (Chairman), Clute, Crumley and Baker, met one time in 2003. The Executive Committee is empowered with the same authority as the Board of Directors in the management of the business of the Corporation, except for certain matters enumerated in the Corporation's By-Laws which are specifically reserved to the full Board of Directors.

        The Audit Committee, the members of which are Messrs. McAlpine (Chairman), Christensen, Coors and Ordoñez, met three times in 2003. Additionally, the Chairman of the committee met four times during the year with the Corporation's independent auditors to review the quarterly financial statements. The Audit Committee's principal functions are to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, and to specifically review: (i) the integrity of the Corporation's financial statements; (ii) the independent auditor's qualifications and independence; (iii) the performance of the Corporation's system of internal audit function and the independent auditor; and (iv) the Corporation's compliance with laws and regulations, including disclosure controls and procedures.

        The Compensation Committee, the members of which are Messrs. Crumley (Chairman), Clute, Coors and McAlpine, met twice in 2003. The Compensation Committee's principal functions are to recommend compensation levels and programs for the Chief Executive Officer to the independent members of the Board of Directors; to recommend compensation levels and programs for all Vice Presidents to the full Board of Directors; and to administer the Corporation's stock-based plans.

        The Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee, the members of which are Messrs. Clute (Chairman), McAlpine, Ordoñez and Crumley, did not meet in 2003. The Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee considers matters of corporate governance and periodically reviews the Corporation's corporate governance guidelines and procedures consistent with the Federal Securities laws and New York Stock Exchange regulations. The Corporate Governance and

6



Directors Nominating Committee also reviews any director candidates, including those nominated or recommended by shareholders, identifies individuals qualified to become directors consistent with criteria approved by the Board of Directors, and recommends to the Board of Directors the director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders, any special meeting of shareholders, or to fill any vacancy on the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee also reviews the appropriateness of the size of the Board of Directors relative to its various responsibilities and recommends committee assignments and committee chairpersons for the standing committees for consideration by the Board of Directors.

        The Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee will consider persons recommended by shareholders as nominees for election as directors. The Corporation's By-Laws provide that any shareholder who is entitled to vote for the election of directors at a meeting called for such purpose may nominate persons for election to the Board of Directors by following the procedures set forth in the section titled, "Provisions of the Corporation's By-Laws with Respect to Shareholder Proposals and Nominations for Election as Directors." Shareholders who wish to submit a proposed nominee to the Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee should send written notice to the Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee Chairman, c/o Michael B. White, Corporate Secretary, Hecla Mining Company, 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815-9408, within the time period set forth in the section titled, "Provisions of the Corporation's By-Laws with Respect to Shareholder Proposals and Nominations for Election as Directors." Such notification should set forth all information relating to such nominee required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for elections of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), including the nominee's written consent to being named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected; the name and address of the shareholder or beneficial owner making the nomination or on whose behalf the nomination is being made; and the class and number of shares of the Corporation owned beneficially and of record by such shareholder or beneficial owner. The Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee will consider shareholder nominees on the same terms as nominees selected by the Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee.

        The Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee believes that nominees for election to the Board of Directors must possess certain minimum qualifications and attributes. The nominee: (1) must exhibit strong personal integrity, character and ethics, and a commitment to ethical business and accounting practices; (2) must not serve on more than two other public company boards; (3) must not be involved in ongoing litigation with the Corporation or be employed by an entity that is engaged in such litigation; and (4) must not be the subject of any ongoing criminal investigations in the jurisdiction of the United States or any state thereof, including investigations for fraud or financial misconduct.

        Except as set forth above, the Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee does not currently have a formal policy regarding the handling or consideration of director candidate recommendations received from a shareholder, or a formal process for identifying and evaluating nominees for directors (including nominees recommended by shareholders). These issues will be considered by the Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee, which will then make a recommendation to the Board of Directors.

        The Technical Committee, the members of which are Messrs. Ordoñez (Chairman), McAlpine, Taylor and Brown, met three times in 2003. The principal function of the Technical Committee is to make recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the advisability of proceeding with the exploration, development, acquisition or divestiture of mineral properties and/or operations.

        The Finance Committee, the members of which are Messrs. Coors (Chairman), Christensen, Crumley and Ordoñez, met twice in 2003. The principal functions of the Finance Committee are to

7



develop and set the Corporation's long-term investment policies and to review the performance of the investment managers of the Corporation's pension trusts.


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Membership and Role of the Audit Committee

        The Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Charles L. McAlpine (Chairman), David J. Christensen, Joe Coors, Jr., and Jorge E. Ordoñez C. Each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the definition of "independent director" as established in the New York Stock Exchange Listing Standards. In addition, each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        The Audit Committee's principal functions are to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, and to specifically review: (i) the integrity of the Corporation's financial statements; (ii) the independent auditor's qualifications and independence; (iii) the performance of the Corporation's system of internal audit function and the independent auditor; and (iv) the Corporation's compliance with laws and regulations, including disclosure controls and procedures. The Audit Committee also appoints the Corporation's independent auditors. The Audit Committee met three times in 2003. Additionally, the Chairman met four times during the year with the Corporation's independent auditors to review the quarterly financial statements.

        The Board adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee on May 5, 2000, and operated under that charter during the 2003 fiscal year. The Audit Committee has reviewed the relevant requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the final rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the final rules of the New York Stock Exchange regarding audit committee policies. The Audit Committee has amended its written charter to reflect the additional requirements of the new rules. On February 25, 2004, the Board of Directors adopted the amended charter. A copy of the amended charter is included in this Proxy Statement as Appendix B. You can also access the charter in the "Investor Relations" section of www.hecla-mining.com under "Corporate Governance" or by writing to us at Hecla Mining Company, 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815-9408, Attention: Investor Relations.

Review of the Corporation's Audited Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2003

        The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, with the Corporation's management. The Audit Committee has discussed with BDO Seidman, LLP, the Corporation's independent auditors, matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communications with Audit Committees), as amended.

        The Audit Committee has also received written disclosures and a letter from BDO Seidman, LLP, required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and the Audit Committee has discussed the independence of BDO Seidman, LLP with that firm.

        Based on the Audit Committee's review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Corporation's audited financial statements be included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, for filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

8



Appointment of Auditors

        The Audit Committee has appointed the firm of BDO Seidman, LLP as the Corporation's independent auditors for fiscal year 2004. BDO Seidman, LLP has served as the Corporation's independent auditors since 2001. Representatives of BDO Seidman, LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make statements and respond to appropriate questions from shareholders present at the meeting. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent auditors for the Corporation. Therefore, the Corporation is not submitting the selection of BDO Seidman, LLP to our shareholders for ratification.

February 24, 2004

Charles L. McAlpine, Chairman
David J. Christensen
Joe Coors, Jr.
Jorge E. Ordoñez C.


AUDITOR FEES

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

        The following table represents fees for professional audit services rendered by BDO Seidman, LLP for the audit of the Corporation's annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003, and December 31, 2002, and fees for other services rendered by BDO Seidman, LLP during those periods.

 
  2003
  2002
Audit Fees   $ 234,885   $ 209,922
Audit Related Fees     72,050     45,080
Tax Fees     27,503     21,793
All Other Fees     0     0
   
 
  Total   $ 334,438   $ 276,795
   
 

        Audit Fees.    Annual audit fees relate to services rendered in connection with the annual audit of the Corporation's consolidated financial statements, quarterly reviews of financial statements included in the Corporation's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and fees for SEC registration statement services.

        Audit Related Fees.    Audit related fees consisted principally of fees for audits of financial statements of employee benefit plans, as well as due diligence services for potential acquisitions and consultation on accounting standards or transactions.

        Tax Fees.    Tax services consisted of fees for tax consultation and tax compliance services, which included preparation of tax returns for our Venezuelan and Mexican subsidiaries, tax planning and miscellaneous tax research.

        All Other Fees.    There were no other fees.

        The Audit Committee considers whether the provision of these services is compatible with maintaining BDO Seidman's independence, and has determined such services for fiscal years 2003 and 2002 were compatible. All of the fees were pre-approved. None of the fees above were approved pursuant to the de minimis exception to the pre-approval requirements. All of the services described above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(B) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act, to the extent that rule was applicable during fiscal years 2003 and 2002.

9


Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors

        The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting compensation and overseeing the work of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has established a policy regarding pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. On an ongoing basis, management communicates specific projects and categories of services for which advance approval of the Audit Committee is requested. The Audit Committee reviews these requests and advises management if the Audit Committee approves the engagement of the independent auditors for specific projects. On a periodic basis, management reports to the Audit Committee regarding the actual spending for such projects and services compared to the approved amounts. The Audit Committee may also delegate the ability to pre-approve audit and permitted non-audit services to a subcommittee consisting of one or more Audit Committee members, provided that any such pre-approvals are reported on at a subsequent Audit Committee meeting.


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

        The Corporation compensates directors who are not employees of the Corporation for their services as follows: (i) a retainer of $3,000 per calendar quarter; (ii) $2,000 for each director's meeting attended; and (iii) $1,000 for attending any meeting of any Committee of the Board of Directors.

        In March 1995, the Corporation adopted the Hecla Mining Company Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the "Directors Stock Plan"), which became effective following shareholder approval on May 5, 1995. The Directors Stock Plan was amended July 18, 2002 and February 25, 2004. The Directors Stock Plan terminates July 17, 2012 and is subject to termination by the Board of Directors at any time. Pursuant to the Directors Stock Plan, on May 30 of each year, each nonemployee director is credited with a number of shares determined by dividing $10,000 by the average closing price for the Corporation's Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the prior calendar year. Nonemployee directors joining the Board of Directors after May 30 of any year are credited with a pro rata number of shares based upon the date they join the Board. All credited shares are held in a grantor trust, the assets of which are subject to the claims of the Corporation's creditors, until delivered under the Directors Stock Plan. Delivery of the shares from the trust occurs upon the earliest of: (i) death or disability; (ii) retirement from the Board; (iii) a cessation of the director's service for any other reason; (iv) a Change in Control of the Corporation (as defined); or (v) at the election of the director at any time, provided, however, that shares must be held in the trust for at least two years prior to delivery. Subject to certain restrictions, directors may elect delivery of the shares on such date or in annual installments thereafter over 5, 10 or 15 years. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock which may be credited pursuant to the Directors Stock Plan is 1,000,000.


COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation

Overall Policy

        Compensation of the Corporation's executive officers rests in the discretion of the Board of Directors, and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is charged with considering specific information and making recommendations to the full Board of Directors with respect to compensation matters. The Compensation Committee is comprised of four independent directors who are appointed annually by the Corporation's Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee's consideration and recommendations regarding executive compensation are guided by a number of factors including overall corporate performance and total return to shareholders. The overall objectives of the Corporation's executive compensation package are: to attract and retain the best possible executive talent; to motivate the Corporation's executives to achieve goals consistent with the Corporation's business strategy; to provide an identity between executive and shareholder interests

10



through stock-based plans; and finally, to provide a compensation package that recognizes an executive's individual contributions in addition to the Corporation's overall business results.

        The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the Corporation's executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee met twice in 2003 to consider various components of the executive compensation program. In making recommendations concerning executive compensation, the Committee reviews reports published by independent compensation consultants assessing compensation programs and reviews the Corporation's executive compensation, corporate performance, stock price appreciation and total return to shareholders against a peer group of public corporations made up of the Corporation's competitors for executive talent. Because most executive skills and expertise are transferable between industries and business segments, the Compensation Committee believes the Corporation's competitors for executive talent are not limited to those companies included in the peer group established for comparing shareholder returns. Thus, the Corporation's peer group used for compensation analysis includes, but is not limited to, the peer group identified in the Performance Graph shown on page 15. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the correlation between the Corporation's performance and its executive compensation in the context of, and in comparison to, the compensation programs of other companies.

        The Compensation Committee recommends compensation levels and programs for the Chief Executive Officer to the independent members of the Board of Directors and recommends compensation levels and programs for all Vice Presidents ("executive officers" as used in this report) to the full Board of Directors. In reviewing individual performance of executive officers whose compensation is detailed in this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee considered the views of Mr. Brown, the Corporation's Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Baker, the Corporation's current President and Chief Executive Officer.

        The key elements of the Corporation's executive compensation consist of base salary, annual cash/stock performance payments and long-term performance programs, including stock-based grants. The Compensation Committee's policies with respect to each of these elements, including the basis for the compensation awarded to Messrs. Brown and Baker, are discussed below. In addition, while the elements of compensation described below are considered separately, the Compensation Committee takes into account the full compensation package afforded by the Corporation to each individual executive, including deferred compensation, pension benefits, supplemental retirement benefits, severance plans, insurance and other benefits, as well as the elements described below. While the Committee takes into consideration all the performance and other factors listed below in setting base salaries, the Committee's deliberations are essentially subjective, and no set quantitative formula determines the base salary level of any of the named executives. The Corporation adopted a revised short-term performance payment plan in 2003, which in part utilized a quantitative formula to determine an executive's eligibility for annual performance payments in addition to base salary. In 2003, the Corporation also adopted a long-term performance plan, which provides for performance payments to executive officers if certain performance targets are met or exceeded over continuing three-year periods.

        The Committee analyzed the potential impact on the Corporation's executive compensation program of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder, which generally disallow deductions for compensation in excess of $1 million per year to the five most highly compensated executives of a public company. Based upon its analysis, the Committee expects that all compensation payable pursuant to its compensation program now in effect will be deductible.

11


Base Salaries

        Base salaries for new executive officers are initially determined by evaluating the responsibilities of the position held and the experience of the individual, and by reference to the competitive marketplace for executive talent, including a comparison to base salaries for comparable positions at other companies including those in the peer group.

        Annual salary adjustments, which are made in May of each year for a 12-month period from June 1 to May 31, are determined by evaluating the performance of the Corporation and of each executive officer, and also taking into account new responsibilities for any particular executive officer. In the case of executive officers who are responsible for a particular business unit, such unit's financial, operating, cost containment and productivity results are also considered by the Committee. The Compensation Committee, where appropriate, also considers other corporate performance measures, including changes in productivity, cost control, safety, environmental awareness and improvements in relations with government officials, regulators, suppliers and employees. The Compensation Committee places a premium on cost containment and productivity for gold, silver and other commodities produced by the Corporation, because the prices for these commodities are established by international markets.

        Base salaries for certain executive officers were increased commencing June 1, 2003, based upon the considerations described above. Mr. Arthur Brown retired as Chief Executive Officer in May 2003. From January 1, 2003, through May 31, 2003, Mr. Brown's salary was $202,728. Mr. Brown continued his duties as Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee set the compensation for Mr. Brown's continuing services from June 1, 2003, through May 31, 2004, at $25,000 per month. The monthly payment is to be paid in shares of the Corporation's Common Stock at the end of each month determined by dividing the average closing price of the Corporation's Common Stock for each month of service into the $25,000 amount. Mr. Brown was credited with 30,433 shares of the Corporation's Common Stock from June 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, under the terms of the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan. For 2003, Mr. Baker's annual salary was $313,542.

Annual Performance Payment

        In 2003, the Corporation adopted a revised short-term performance payment plan based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. Under the plan, executive officers (seven in 2003) were eligible for annual cash payments based upon a formula established in the plan covering the calendar year 2003 and generally described below. The Compensation Committee, based on recommendations of the Corporation's senior management, established targeted quantitative and nonquantitative goals for corporate performance. For 2003, corporate performance quantitative goals included total gold and silver production, production costs per ounce for silver and gold, cost containment, environmental costs, capital expenditures and resource development goals. Corporate nonquantitative goals included, among other goals, a successful investor relations program, acquisitions, positive stock performance and completion of a preferred stock exchange.

        The Chief Executive Officer's performance payment for 2003 was based solely on corporate performance. The other executive officers' performance payments were based 60% upon corporate performance with 40% based upon a Chief Executive Officer discretionary component. A performance payment pool was targeted based on the annual cash and stock-based salary equal to 60% for the Chief Executive Officer and 40% for each Vice President.

        The Board or Compensation Committee reviews with management, performance on a quarterly basis. At the Compensation Committee meeting following the performance year, the actual performance results are compared against the targeted performance goals. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves individual performance payments for all eligible executives. The Compensation Committee has the sole discretion to increase or decrease the amount of performance

12



pay under the plan. For 2003, the Compensation Committee determined to pay the annual performance bonus in cash. Some executives elected to defer their bonus compensation pursuant to the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan. For 2003, Mr. Phillips S. Baker, Jr., the Corporation's President and Chief Executive Officer, received a payment comprised of $214,500 in cash. For the named executive officers, the amounts are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table under "Annual Compensation-Bonus."

Long-Term Performance Plan

        The Corporation's long-term performance payment plan is comprised of successive three-year plans, which are established annually. The plans establish certain performance targets, which include increased production levels, increased mineral reserves and resources and cash flow with metals prices being fixed for the first three-year period. At the end of each three-year period, performance is reviewed against the plan targets. The first three-year performance period under the long-term performance payment plan will end in 2005.

Stock-Based Grants

        The Corporation uses three stock-based compensation plans, which are intended to give the Corporation a competitive advantage in attracting, retaining and motivating its officers and key employees, and provide incentives more directly linked to the performance of the Corporation's businesses and increases in shareholder value.

        The 1987 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the "1987 Plan") was approved by the shareholders in 1987 and provides that stock options may be granted to the Corporation's officers and key employees, including the individuals whose compensation is detailed in this Proxy Statement. The right to grant options under this plan expired in February 1997. Certain previously granted options remain available to exercise under the 1987 Plan. All options previously granted under the 1987 Plan were granted at the fair market value of the stock on the date of the grant. All outstanding options granted under the 1987 Plan, unless exercised, will expire no later than February 2005.

        In May 1995, the shareholders of the Corporation approved the Corporation's 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, which provides for a variety of stock-based grants to the Corporation's officers and key employees, including the individuals whose compensation is detailed in this Proxy Statement. Stock options granted in 2003 to the six named executive officers are also summarized in the Summary Compensation Table under "Long-Term Compensation Awards-Options."

        In 2002, Mr. Brown was awarded a grant of nonstatutory stock options under the Corporation's 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, where the grant only became effective and exercisable if the Corporation's Common Stock price reached certain designated increased price levels. On January 9, 2003, the Corporation's Common Stock remained $1.00 above the original May 2002 grant price of $3.23 for twenty (20) consecutive business days and on January 9, 2003, Mr. Brown was granted 75,000 stock options. In addition, on August 19, 2003, the Corporation's Common Stock remained $2.00 above the original May 2002 grant price of $3.23 for twenty (20) consecutive business days and on August 19, 2003, Mr. Brown was granted 60,000 additional stock options. All options were granted at the market price of the Common Stock on the date the grant became effective. Mr. Brown was not granted any additional stock options in 2003.

        In 2003, Mr. Baker was granted nonstatutory stock options to purchase 240,000 shares of Common Stock at the market price of the Common Stock on the date of the grant under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. As of December 31, 2003, Mr. Baker owned 128,609 shares of Common Stock and held options to purchase an additional 300,000 shares under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. In addition, as of December 31, 2003, Mr. Baker held 100,000 stock options under the Corporation's Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan.

13



        The Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan ("Plan") was approved by the shareholders in July 2002 and permits each participant to defer eligible compensation and/or cash incentive compensation which is payable in the form of shares of the Corporation's Common Stock, in cash, or in the form of discounted stock options on the date or dates selected by the participant or on such other date or dates specified in the Plan. Amounts deferred by the six named executives in 2003 are summarized in the "Deferred 2003 Compensation Table" and under "Long-Term Compensation Awards-Options" in the Summary Compensation Table.

Conclusion

        The Corporation's executive compensation is primarily based upon individual performance, corporate performance and stock price appreciation. In 2003, a significant portion of the Corporation's executive compensation consisted of stock-based remuneration and performance-based variable elements. The Compensation Committee intends to continue the policy of relating executive compensation to corporate performance and emphasizing stock-based remuneration, which aligns the executive officers with shareholders, recognizing that the ups and downs of the business cycle, from time to time, may result in an imbalance for a particular period. The Compensation Committee adjusts for factors such as these, which are beyond an executive's control, by exercising its qualitative judgment rather than employing strict quantitative formulas.

February 24, 2004

        Ted Crumley, Chairman
John E. Clute
Joe Coors, Jr.
Charles L. McAlpine


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

        The members of the Compensation Committee are set forth in the preceding section. There are no members of the Compensation Committee who were officers or employees of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries during the fiscal year, formerly officers of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries, or had any relationship otherwise requiring disclosure hereunder.

14




COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN(1)

        This line graph compares the yearly cumulative total shareholder return on Common Stock with the S&P 500, the S&P Gold Index and certain peer group members. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 1998, in Common Stock and in each of the foregoing indices. The stock price performance shown in this chart is not necessarily indicative of future performance.


Hecla Mining, S&P 500, S&P 500 Gold Index, and Peer Group(2)

         GRAPHIC


Date

  Hecla Mining
  S&P 500
  S&P 500
Gold Index

  Peer Group
December 1998   $ 100.00   $ 100.00   $ 100.00   $ 100.00
December 1999   $ 43.10   $ 121.01   $ 96.30   $ 88.57
December 2000   $ 13.79   $ 109.99   $ 79.30   $ 50.10
December 2001   $ 25.93   $ 96.98   $ 90.00   $ 77.12
December 2002   $ 139.59   $ 75.59   $ 113.89   $ 142.97
December 2003   $ 228.69   $ 97.24   $ 191.62   $ 243.70

(1)
Total return assumes reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis.

(2)
Peer Group: Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd., Bema Gold Corporation, Cambior, Inc., Coeur d'Alene Mines Corp., Pan American Silver Corp.

15



SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        To the knowledge of the Corporation, as of March 11, 2004, the only beneficial owner (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of more than five percent (5%) of the Corporation's Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is shown in the table below:

Title of Class

  Name & Address of
Beneficial Owner

  Amount & Nature of
Beneficial Ownership(1)

  Percent of
Class

 
Common   Royce & Associates, LLC
1414 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019
  12,827,000   10.88 %


(1)    Security ownership information for the beneficial owner is taken from statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Sections 13(d), (f) and (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information made known to the Corporation.

 

        The following table presents certain information regarding the number and percentage of the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by each current director, director nominee and executive officer of the Corporation and by all current directors, nominees and executive officers as a group, as of March 11, 2004. On that date, all of such persons together beneficially owned an aggregate of approximately 2% of the outstanding shares of the Corporation's Common Stock. Except as otherwise indicated, the directors, nominees and officers have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by them.

Beneficial Ownership Table

 
   
  Shares Beneficially Owned
   
Name of Beneficial Owner

  Title of
Class

   
  Number
  Nature
  Percentage(1)
Phillips S. Baker, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
  Common   128,609
300,000
306,327

734,936
  Direct
Vested Options(2)
KEDCP Options(3)
 
*

Arthur Brown
Chairman

 

Common

 

315,520
641,000
36,659

993,179

 

Direct(4)
Vested Options(2)
KEDCP Stock(5)

 


*

Michael H. Callahan
Vice President-Corporate Development

 

Common

 

33,131
48,334
48,565

130,030

 

Direct(6)
Vested Options(2)
KEDCP Options(3)

 


*

Ronald W. Clayton
Vice President-North American Operations

 

Common

 

0
0
9,795

9,795

 

Direct
Vested Options(2)
KEDCP Options(3)

 


*

David J. Christensen
Director

 

Common

 

12,368
0

12,368

 

Direct
Indirect(7)

 


*
                 

16



John E. Clute
Director

 

Common

 

300
20,513

20,813

 

Direct
Indirect(7)

 


*

Joe Coors, Jr.
Director

 

Common

 

20,513

 

Indirect(7)

 

*

Ted Crumley
Director

 

Common

 

4,000
20,052

24,052

 

Direct
Indirect(7)

 


*

Thomas F. Fudge, Jr.
Vice President-Operations

 

Common

 

32,889
110,500

143,389

 

Direct
Vested Options(2)

 


*

Charles L. McAlpine
Director

 

Common

 

2,000
20,513

22,513

 

Direct
Indirect(7)

 


*

Jorge E. Ordoñez C.
Director

 

Common

 

20,513

 

Indirect(7)

 

*

Dr. Anthony P. Taylor
Director

 

Common

 

6,000
13,513

19,513

 

Direct
Indirect(7)

 


*

Vicki Veltkamp
Vice President-Investor and Public Relations

 

Common

 

15,495
118,500
11,260

145,255

 

Direct(8)
Vested Options(2)
KEDCP Options(3)

 


*

Lewis E. Walde
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

Common

 

21,579
75,500
4,000

101,079

 

Direct(9)
Vested Options(2)
KEDCP Options(3)

 


*

All current directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)

 

Common

 

2,397,948

 

 

 

2%

*
Represents holdings of less than one percent.

  (1) Percent of class is calculated based upon 117,947,242 shares of the Corporation's Common Stock outstanding as of March 11, 2004.  

 

(2)

"Vested Options" are options that may be exercised as of March 11, 2004.

 

 

(3)

"KEDCP Options" are options purchased under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan as of March 11, 2004.

 

 

(4)

Consists of 15,962 shares held jointly with Mr. Brown's spouse.

 

 

(5)

"KEDCP Stock" consists of share units acquired by Mr. Brown under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan. See "Compensation of Executive Officer-
Base Salaries."

 
       

17



 

(6)

Consists of 32,931 shares held jointly with Mr. Callahan's spouse.

 

 

(7)

Shares credited to each nonemployee director, all of which are held indirectly in trust pursuant to the Corporation's Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors. Each director disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares held in trust under the stock plan. See "Compensation of Directors."

 

 

(8)

All 15,495 shares are held jointly with Ms. Veltkamp's spouse.

 

 

(9)

All 21,579 shares are held jointly with Mr. Walde's spouse.

 


SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

        Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Corporation's directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of the Corporation's Common Stock to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission reports regarding their ownership and changes in their ownership of the Corporation's stock. These persons are required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to furnish the Corporation with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

        Based solely on the Corporation's review of copies of such forms, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no such forms were required, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, all filing requirements applicable to the Corporation's officers, directors and greater than 10% owners of the Corporation's Common Stock were satisfied, except for the following:

18



COMPENSATION TABLES

Compensation for 2003

        The following table sets forth information regarding the aggregate compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, paid or accrued for: (i) the former Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation; (ii) the current President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation; and (iii) the four other most highly paid executive officers of the Corporation.

Summary Compensation Table

 
   
   
   
   
  Long-Term
Compensation
Awards

   
 
   
  Annual Compensation(1)
   
   
Name and Principal Position

   
  Other Annual
Compensation(3)

  All Other
Compensation(4)

  Year
  Salary(2)
  Bonus(2)
  Options
Phillips S. Baker, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
  2003
2002
2001
  $
$
$
313,542
259,500
162,500
  $
$
$
214,500
400,000
99,000
  $
$
$
424,137
-0-
-0-
  340,000(5)
150,000
60,000
  $
$
$
3,000
201,000
49,609

Arthur Brown(6)
Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer

 

2003
2002
2001

 

$
$
$

377,728
357,508
402,500

(7)


$
$
$

-0-
402,500
144,900

 

$
$
$

1,917,414
18,328
-0-

 

135,000
150,000
200,000

 

$
$
$

300,383
383,727
43,776

Michael H. Callahan(6)
Vice President-Corporate Develop.

 

2003
2002
2001

 

$
$
$

132,708
123,751
120,000

 

$
$
$

71,280
104,000
72,000

 

$
$
$

340,516
58,267
-0-

 

121,314(8)
85,000
30,000

 

$
$
$

2,083
2,295
2,154

Ronald W. Clayton
Vice President-North American Operations

 

2003
2002
2001

 

$
$
$

124,801
27,090
-0-

 

$
$
$

63,960
26,000
-0-

 

$
$
$

425,840
-0-
-0-

 

125,192(9)
85,000
-0-

 

$
$
$

1,862
24
-0-

Thomas F. Fudge, Jr.
Vice President-Operations

 

2003
2002
2001

 

$
$
$

160,833
150,000
150,000

 

$
$
$

67,592
120,000
45,000

 

$
$
$

295,838
-0-
-0-

 

114,000
85,000
60,000

 

$
$
$

3,201
132,811
3,335

Lewis E. Walde
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

2003
2002
2001

 

$
$
$

122,292
110,000
106,000

 

$
$
$

57,240
88,000
33,000

 

$
$
$

497,220
6,982
-0-

 

110,000
85,000
30,000

 

$
$
$

2,438
110,547
1,720

  (1) The annual compensation set forth in the table is based upon salaries of the Chief Executive Officer and other named executives established in May of each year for June 1 to May 31. This table reflects compensation paid to, or earned by, the executive officers during the fiscal year ending December 31 of each year.  
       

19



 

(2)

Portions of the named executives "Salary" and "Bonus" were deferred into the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan. See "Deferred 2003 Compensation Table."

 

Deferred 2003 Compensation Table

Name

  Salary
  Bonus
  Total Deferred
Compensation

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.   $ 49,083   $ 107,250   $ 156,333
Arthur Brown   $ 175,000   $ -0-   $ 175,000
Michael H. Callahan   $ 18,000   $ 35,640   $ 53,640
Ronald W. Clayton   $ 5,199   $ -0-   $ 5,199
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr.   $ -0-   $ -0-   $ -0-
Lewis E. Walde   $ 4,800   $ 23,620   $ 28,420

 

(3)

"Other Annual Compensation" for the last fiscal year includes the following for Messrs. Baker, Brown, Callahan, Clayton, Fudge and Walde: (i) tax offset bonuses associated with exercises of stock options granted prior to 2003 of $-0-, $381,467, $1,449, $-0-, $24,337 and $-0-, for each named executive, respectively; (ii) an economic gain on stock option exercises of $424,137, $1,533,559, $339,067, $424,235, $271,501 and $497,220, for each named executive, respectively; (iii) a moving expense allowance for Mr. Clayton of $1,605; and (iv) personal tax service provided by consultants at the expense of the Corporation for Mr. Brown of $2,388.

 

 

(4)

"All Other Compensation" for the last fiscal year includes the following for Messrs. Baker, Brown, Callahan, Clayton, Fudge and Walde: (i) matching contributions under the Corporation's Capital Accumulation Plan of $3,000, $3,000, $1,984, $1,718, $3,000 and $2,361, for each named executive, respectively; (ii) the dollar value benefit of premium payments for term life insurance coverage of $-0-, $867, $99, $144, $201 and $77, for each named executive, respectively; and (iii) retirement payments made to Mr. Brown in the amount of $296,516.

 

 

(5)

In 2003, Mr. Baker purchased 100,000 stock options with funds deferred under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan in 2002, in accordance with the terms of such plan. The remaining 240,000 stock options were granted under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan during 2003.

 

 

(6)

Arthur Brown is the father-in-law of Michael H. Callahan, the Corporation's Vice President-Corporate Development.

 

 

(7)

From January 2003 through May 2003, Mr. Brown was paid a salary of $202,728. From June 2003 through December 2003, Mr. Brown was paid $175,000 worth of the Corporation's Common Stock, which was deferred under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

 

(8)

In 2003, Mr. Callahan purchased 11,314 stock options with funds deferred under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan in 2002, in accordance with the terms of such plan. The remaining 110,000 stock options were granted under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan during 2003.

 

 

(9)

In 2003, Mr. Clayton purchased 15,192 stock options with funds deferred under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan in 2002 and 2003, in accordance with the terms of such plan. The remaining 110,000 stock options were granted under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan during 2003.

 

20


Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year

 
  Individual Grants
   
   
   
 
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
Granted(1)

  % of Total
Options Granted
to Hecla
Employees in
Fiscal Year

   
  Fair
Market
Value on
Date of
Grant

   
  Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rate of Stock Price Appreciation for Option Term(3)
 
  Exercise
or Base
Price:
$/Share

   
Name

  Expiration
Date

  0%
  5%
  10%
Phillips S. Baker, Jr.   75,000(2)   5.43 % $ 5.185(4)   $ 5.185   1/31/05     --   $ 39,863   $ 81,668
Arthur Brown   75,000(2)   5.43 % $ 5.185(4)   $ 5.185   1/31/05     --   $ 39,863   $ 81,668
Michael H. Callahan   40,000(2)   2.90 % $ 5.185(4)   $ 5.185   1/31/05     --   $ 21,260   $ 43,556
Ronald W. Clayton   40,000(2)   2.90 % $ 5.185(4)   $ 5.185   1/31/05     --   $ 21,260   $ 43,556
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr.   40,000(2)   2.90 % $ 5.185(4)   $ 5.185   1/31/05     --   $ 21,260   $ 43,556
Lewis E. Walde   40,000(2)   2.90 % $ 5.185(4)   $ 5.185   1/31/05     --   $ 21,260   $ 43,556

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

 

60,000(2)

 

4.35

%

$

6.235(5)

 

$

6.235

 

1/31/05

 

 

--

 

$

28,530

 

$

39,276
Arthur Brown   60,000(2)   4.35 % $ 6.235(5)   $ 6.235   1/31/05     --   $ 28,530   $ 39,276
Michael H. Callahan   40,000(2)   2.90 % $ 6.235(5)   $ 6.235   1/31/05     --   $ 19,020   $ 26,184
Ronald W. Clayton   40,000(2)   2.90 % $ 6.235(5)   $ 6.235   1/31/05     --   $ 19,020   $ 26,184
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr.   40,000(2)   2.90 % $ 6.235(5)   $ 6.235   1/31/05     --   $ 19,020   $ 26,184
Lewis E. Walde   40,000(2)   2.90 % $ 6.235(5)   $ 6.235   1/31/05     --   $ 19,020   $ 26,184

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

 

105,000(2)

 

7.61

%

$

4.075(6)

 

$

4.075

 

5/08/08

 

 

--

 

$

118,220

 

$

261,230
Michael H. Callahan   30,000(2)   2.17 % $ 4.075(6)   $ 4.075   5/08/08     --   $ 33,777   $ 74,637
Ronald W. Clayton   30,000(2)   2.17 % $ 4.075(6)   $ 4.075   5/08/08     --   $ 33,777   $ 74,637
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr.   34,000(2)   2.46 % $ 4.075(6)   $ 4.075   5/08/08     --   $ 38,281   $ 84,589
Lewis E. Walde   30,000(2)   2.17 % $ 4.075(6)   $ 4.075   5/08/08     --   $ 33,777   $ 74,637

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

 

100,000

 

7.25

%

$

3.645(7)

 

$

4.05

 

2/21/10

 

$

40,500

 

$

205,370

 

$

424,750
Michael H. Callahan   11,314   0.82 % $ 3.645(7)   $ 4.05   2/21/10   $ 4,582   $ 23,235   $ 48,056
Ronald W. Clayton   4,855   0.35 % $ 3.645(7)   $ 4.05   2/21/10   $ 1,966   $ 9,971   $ 20,621
Ronald W. Clayton   2,644   0.19 % $ 3.717(7)   $ 4.13   5/12/10   $ 1,091   $ 5,538   $ 11,451
Ronald W. Clayton   7,693   0.56 % $ 6.219(7)   $ 6.91   11/14/10   $ 5,316   $ 26,957   $ 55,748

  (1) There are no tax offset bonuses accompanying these options.  

 

(2)

All options were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant.

 

 

(3)

The potential realizable value shown in the table represents the maximum gain if held for the full term at each of the assumed annual appreciation rates. Gains, if any, are dependent upon the actual performance of the Common Stock and the timing of any sale of the Common Stock received upon exercising the options.

 

 

(4)

In addition to the May 2002, regular grant of stock options, each of the named executives were awarded additional stock options, that were to be effective and exercisable if the Corporation's Common Stock price reached certain designated price levels. On January 9, 2003, the Corporation's Common Stock remained $1.00 above the original May 2002 grant price of $3.23 for twenty (20) consecutive business days and on January 9, 2003, each named executive was granted the additional stock options. These options vested immediately.

 

 

(5)

In addition to the May 2002, regular grant of stock options, each of the named executives were awarded additional stock options, that were to be effective and exercisable if the Corporation's Common Stock price reached certain designated price levels. On August 19, 2003, the Corporation's Common Stock remained $2.00 above the original May 2002 grant price of $3.23 for twenty (20) consecutive business days and on August 19, 2003, each named executive was granted the additional stock options. These options vested immediately.

 
       

21



 

(6)

These options were granted in May 2003, and vested immediately.

 

 

(7)

Stock options purchased by the individuals with funds deferred under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan in accordance with the terms of such plan.

 

Total Options Exercised in 2003
and Fiscal Year-End Option Values

        The following table shows information concerning the exercise of stock options during fiscal year 2003 by each of the named executive officers and the value (stock price less exercise price) of the remaining stock options held by those executive officers at fiscal year-end, using the average ($8.40) of the high and low trading price of the Corporation's Common Stock on December 31, 2003.

 
   
   
  Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options Held at 12/31/03

  Value of Unexercised
In-The-Money
Options at 12/31/03

 
  Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)

   
Name

  Value
Realized
($)

  Exercisable
(#)

  Unexercisable
(#)

  Exercisable
($)

  Unexercisable
($)

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.   150,000   428,685   400,000(1)   -0-   1,736,850   -0-
Arthur Brown   345,000   1,544,022   641,000   -0-   1,836,740   -0-
Michael H. Callahan   159,666   342,285   48,334   11,314(2)   129,687   53,798
Ronald W. Clayton   166,603(3)   429,290   -0-   7,693(4)   -0-   16,752
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr.   87,600   171,508   110,500   -0-   417,150   -0-
Lewis E. Walde   145,000   502,538   75,500   -0-   227,550   -0-

  (1) Includes 100,000 stock options purchased by Mr. Baker under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan.  

 

(2)

Stock options purchased by Mr. Callahan under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

 

(3)

Includes 11,603 stock options purchased by Mr. Clayton under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

 

(4)

Stock Options purchased by Mr. Clayton under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

Long-Term Incentive Plans-Awards in Last Fiscal Year

 
   
   
  Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Stock Price-Based Plans
 
   
  Performance or Other Period until Maturation or Payout
Name

  Number of Shares, Units or Other Rights (#)
  Threshold
($)

  Target
($)

  Maximum
($)

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.   3,700   12/31/05   -0-   370,000   740,000
Michael H. Callahan   1,200   12/31/05   -0-   120,000   240,000
Ronald W. Clayton   1,200   12/31/05   -0-   120,000   240,000
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr.   1,320   12/31/05   -0-   132,000   264,000
Lewis E. Walde   1,200   12/31/05   -0-   120,000   240,000

        The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors makes performance unit awards at the beginning of each plan period. Such awards are initially assigned a nominal dollar value of $100 each. The ultimate dollar value of each unit upon payment to an officer (the "terminal dollar value") is dependent upon the Corporation attaining certain quantifiable strategic corporate performance targets approved by the Committee. Performance unit terminal dollar value can range from $0 to $200 depending upon the percentage of targets actually achieved. Plan participation eligibility requirements are established by the Committee and is restricted to those officers and senior managers who can directly affect the Corporation's achievement of the targeted corporate performance.

22



EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

        The following table provides information as of December 31, 2003, regarding our compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities are authorized for issuance:

 
  Number of Securities To Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
  Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
  Number of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders:              
  1987 and 1995 Stock Incentive Plans   2,052,902   $ 5.08   821,860
  Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors   115,617     N/A   830,809
  Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan   202,218   $ 4.31   5,763,543
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders   --     --   --
   
 
 
Total   2,370,737   $ 5.01   7,416,212
   
 
 


OTHER BENEFITS

Retirement Plan

        The officers of the Corporation participate in the Hecla Mining Company Qualified Retirement Plan (the "Retirement Plan"), which covers substantially all employees of the Corporation, except for certain hourly employees who are covered by separate plans. Contributions to the Retirement Plan, and the related expense or income, are based on general actuarial calculations and, accordingly, no portion of the Corporation's contributions, and related expenses or income, is specifically attributable to the Corporation's officers. The Corporation was not required to make a contribution for 2003. The Corporation also has an unfunded Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan adopted in November 1985 (the "Supplemental Plan") under which the amount of any benefits not payable under the Retirement Plan by reason of the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and/or the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended (the "Acts"), and the loss, if any, due to a deferral of salary made under the Corporation's Executive Deferral Plan and/or the Capital Accumulation Plan will be paid out of the general funds of the Corporation to any employee who may be adversely affected. Under the Acts, the current maximum annual pension benefit payable by the plan to any employee is $160,000 subject to specified adjustments. Upon reaching the normal retirement age of 65, each participant is eligible to receive annual retirement benefits in monthly installments for life equal to, for each year of credited service, 1% of final average annual earnings (defined as the highest average earnings of such employee for any 36 consecutive calendar months during the final 120 calendar months of service) up to the applicable covered compensation level (which level is based on the Social Security maximum taxable wage base) and 1.75% of the difference, if any, between final average annual earnings and the applicable covered compensation level. The Retirement Plan and Supplemental Plan define earnings for purposes of the plans to be "a wage or salary for services of employees inclusive of any bonus or special pay including gain sharing programs, contract miners' bonus pay and the equivalent."

        The following table shows estimated aggregate annual benefits under the Retirement Plan and the Supplemental Plan payable upon retirement to a participant who retires in 2003 at age 65 having the years of service and final average annual earnings as specified. The table assumes Social Security covered compensation levels as in effect on January 1, 2003.

23



Estimated Annual Retirement Benefits

 
  Years of Credited Service
Final Average
Annual
Earnings

  5
  10
  15
  20
  25
  30
  35
$100,000   $ 7,101   $ 14,202   $ 21,304   $ 28,405   $ 35,506   $ 42,607   $ 49,708
  125,000     9,289     18,577     27,866     37,155     46,444     55,732     65,021
  150,000     11,476     22,952     34,429     45,905     57,381     68,857     80,333
  175,000     13,664     27,327     40,991     54,655     68,319     81,982     95,646
  200,000     15,851     31,702     47,554     63,405     79,256     95,107     110,958
  225,000     18,039     36,077     54,116     72,155     90,194     108,232     126,271
  250,000     20,226     40,452     60,679     80,905     101,131     121,357     141,583
  275,000     22,414     44,827     67,241     89,655     112,069     134,482     156,896
  300,000     24,601     49,202     73,804     98,405     123,006     147,607     172,208
  325,000     26,789     53,577     80,366     107,155     133,944     160,732     187,521
  350,000     28,976     57,952     86,929     115,905     144,881     173,857     202,833
  375,000     31,164     62,327     93,491     124,655     155,819     186,982     218,146
  400,000     33,351     66,702     100,054     133,405     166,756     200,107     233,458
  425,000     35,539     71,077     106,616     142,155     177,694     213,232     248,771
  450,000     37,726     75,452     113,179     150,905     188,631     226,357     264,083
  475,000     39,914     79,827     119,741     159,655     199,569     239,482     279,396
  500,000     42,101     84,202     126,304     168,405     210,506     252,607     294,708
  525,000     44,289     88,577     132,866     177,155     221,444     265,732     310,021

        Benefits listed in the pension table are not subject to any deduction for Social Security or other offset amounts. As of December 31, 2003, the following executive officers have completed the indicated number of full years of credited service: P. Baker, 2 years; M. Callahan, 11 years; R. Clayton, 14 years; T. Fudge, 10 years; and L. Walde, 12 years.

Employment Agreements, Termination of Employment Arrangement and Other Management Arrangements

        The Corporation has employment agreements (collectively, the "Agreements") with Messrs. Baker, Callahan, Clayton, Fudge and Walde (collectively, the "Executives" and individually, an "Executive").

        The Agreements were recommended to the Board of Directors by the Compensation Committee and were approved by the Board of Directors on the basis of such recommendation. The Agreements, which are substantially identical except for compensation provisions, provide that each of the Executives shall serve in such executive position as the Board of Directors may direct. The Agreements become effective only upon a "Change of Control" of the Corporation (the "Effective Date"). The term of employment under the Agreements is two years from the Effective Date. The Agreements have a Change in Control period of three years, and this period is automatically renewed for an additional year in June of each year unless the Corporation gives notice of nonrenewal 60 days prior to the renewal date. Under the Agreements, a Change of Control of the Corporation is deemed to occur if a person (including a "group" under Section 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the "Exchange Act") becomes the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the voting power of the Corporation or if, as the result of a tender offer, merger, proxy fight or similar transaction, the persons who were previously directors of the Corporation cease to constitute a majority of the board. The Agreements are intended to ensure that, in the event of a Change of Control, each Executive will continue to receive payments and other benefits equivalent to those he was receiving at the time of a Change of Control for the duration of the term of the Agreement. The Agreements also provide, among other things, that should an Executive's employment be terminated by the Corporation or by the

24



Executive for good reason (other than death, incapacity or misconduct) after the Effective Date of the Agreement, he would receive from the Corporation a lump-sum defined amount generally equivalent to two times the aggregate of his then annual base salary rate and his highest annual bonus for the three years prior to the Effective Date. The Executives would also be entitled to lump-sum payments representing the difference in pension and supplemental retirement benefits to which they would be entitled on: (i) the date of actual termination, and (ii) the end of the two-year employment period under the Agreements. The Corporation would also maintain such Executive's participation in all benefit plans and programs (or provide equivalent benefits if such continued participation was not possible under the terms of such plans and programs). An Executive whose employment has terminated would not be required to seek other employment in order to receive the defined benefits. The Agreements also provide that under certain circumstances the Corporation will make an additional gross-up payment if necessary to place the Executive in the same after-tax position as if no excise tax were imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. Pursuant to the Agreements between the Corporation and each of its named executive officers, if a Change of Control occurred and the named executive officers were each terminated as of December 31, 2003, the Executives would be entitled to the following estimated cash payments pursuant to the Agreements: Mr. Baker, $1,450,000; Mr. Callahan, $478,000; Mr. Clayton, $387,920; Mr. Fudge, $580,000 and Mr. Walde, $446,000. These dollar amounts do not include amounts which would have otherwise been payable to each Executive if the Executive had terminated employment on the day prior to a Change of Control.


AMENDMENT TO THE CORPORATION'S 1995
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

Introduction

        Shareholders are being asked to consider and vote on a proposal to amend the Corporation's 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan") to increase the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the plan from 6,000,000 to 11,000,000. As a result of previous stock-based grants under the Incentive Plan, there are currently only 821,860 shares remaining for future stock-based grants under the Incentive Plan. The amendment to the Incentive Plan was approved by the Board of Directors on February 25, 2004, subject to shareholder approval. The Board of Directors believes it is in the best interest of the Corporation to increase the number of shares available under the plan so that the Corporation can continue to attract, retain and motivate officers and key employees. The Incentive Plan was originally adopted in March 1995 and became effective following shareholder approval on May 5, 1995.

Description of the Incentive Plan

        The following is a summary of the principal features of the Incentive Plan, as amended, as described above. The summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description of all the provisions of the Incentive Plan. Any shareholder who wishes to obtain a copy of the plan may do so by written request to the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation.

Eligibility

        Officers and employees of the Corporation, its subsidiaries and affiliates, designated by the committee of the board designated to administer the plan (the "Committee") who are responsible for or contribute to the management, growth and profitability of the Corporation are eligible to be granted awards under the Incentive Plan. No grant will be made under the Incentive Plan to a director who is not an officer or salaried employee. The Board currently estimates that approximately 65 persons will participate in the Incentive Plan.

25



Plan Features

        As amended, the Incentive Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 11,000,000 shares of the Corporation's Common Stock pursuant to the grant or exercise of stock options, including incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and performance units. Prior to the proposed amendment, only 821,860 of the maximum amount of 6,000,000 shares were available for future stock-based grants under the Incentive Plan. The shares available under the Incentive Plan can be divided among the various types of awards and participants as the Committee sees fit. The shares subject to grant under the Incentive Plan are to be made available from authorized but unissued shares or from treasury shares. Awards may be granted for such duration as the Committee may determine, except that the duration of an incentive stock option may not exceed 10 years from its date of grant. No awards outstanding on the termination date of the Incentive Plan shall be affected or impaired by such termination. The Committee has broad authority to fix the terms and conditions of individual agreements with participants. As indicated above, several types of stock grants can be made under the Incentive Plan. A summary of the grants under the Incentive Plan is set forth below under "Receipt of Plan Benefits."

Stock Options

        The Incentive Plan authorizes the Committee to grant options to purchase the Corporation's Common Stock at an exercise price which cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of such stock on the date of grant. The Incentive Plan permits optionees, with the approval of the Committee, to pay the exercise price of options in cash, stock (valued at its fair market value on the date of exercise) or a combination thereof. The duration of options shall be as determined by the Committee, but not longer than 10 years from the date of grant in the case of incentive stock options. The Committee also has the discretion to cash out options when they are exercised. The Committee will determine the time conditions under which options will become exercisable, and the extent to which they will be exercisable after the option holder's employment terminates. Generally, options terminate upon the option holder's termination of employment for cause (as defined in the Incentive Plan), and will remain exercisable for not more than one year after the option holder's death, not more than three years after the option holder's employment terminates because of disability, not more than five years after the option holders' retirement, and not more than three months after the option holder's employment terminates for any other reason (other than following a Change in Control of the Corporation [as defined in the Incentive Plan], in which case the options will remain exercisable for not more than six months and one day from the date of termination). Options are not transferable, except by will and the laws of descent and distribution and, in the case of nonqualified stock options, pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order or a gift to an optionee's children. Within the 60-day period from and after a Change in Control, the option holder has the right to elect to surrender all or part of the options to the Corporation and to receive cash in an amount specified in the Incentive Plan.

        As noted above, options may be granted either as incentive stock options or nonqualified options. The principal difference between incentive stock options and nonqualified options is tax treatment. Incentive stock options may only be granted to employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. See "Federal Income Tax Consequences" below.

Stock Appreciation Rights

        The Incentive Plan authorizes the Committee to grant stock appreciation rights in conjunction with all or part of any stock option granted under the Incentive Plan. Stock appreciation rights are only exercisable at such time as the stock options to which they relate are exercisable. A stock appreciation right will entitle the optionee, in lieu of exercising the option, to receive the excess of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of exercise over the specified option price multiplied by the number of shares for which the optionee is exercising the stock appreciation right. Such amount

26



will be paid to the holder in stock (valued at its fair market value on the date of exercise), cash or a combination thereof, as the Committee may determine. A stock appreciation right may be granted as an alternative to a previously or contemporaneously granted nonqualified option, but may only be granted contemporaneously with the grant of an incentive stock option. Because a stock appreciation right is an alternative to an option, the option will be canceled to the extent that the stock appreciation right is exercised, and the stock appreciation right will be canceled to the extent the option is exercised or terminated. Stock appreciation rights are transferable only under the same circumstances as are applicable to options, described above.

Restricted Stock

        The Incentive Plan authorizes the Committee to grant restricted stock to individuals with such restriction periods as the Committee may designate. The Committee may also provide prior to grant that restricted stock cannot vest unless applicable performance goals are satisfied. These performance goals must be based on the attainment of one or any combination of the following: specified levels of earnings per share from continuing operations; operating income; revenues; return on operating assets; return on equity; shareholder return; total shareholder return; ore reserve growth; achievement of cost controls; production targets at specific mines or company-wide or prices of stock of the Corporation or certain subsidiaries; divisions or departments for or within which the participant is primarily employed, as appropriate. Such performance goals also may be based on the attainment of specified levels of Corporation performance under one or more of the measures described above relative to the performance of other corporations. Performance goals based on the foregoing factors are referred to as "Performance Goals." The Committee may, in addition to requiring satisfaction of Performance Goals, condition vesting upon the continued service of the participant. The provisions of restricted stock awards (including any applicable Performance Goals) need not be the same with respect to each participant. During the restriction period, the Committee may require that the stock certificates evidencing restricted shares be held by the Corporation. Restricted stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered. Other than these restrictions on transfer and any other restrictions the Committee may impose, the participant will have all the rights of a holder of stock holding the class or series of stock that is the subject of the restricted stock award.

Performance Units

        The Incentive Plan authorizes the Committee to grant performance units payable in cash or shares of the Corporation's Common Stock, conditioned upon continued service and/or the attainment of Performance Goals (based on one or more of the measures described in the section entitled "Restricted Stock" above) determined by such Committee during an award cycle. An award cycle consists of a period of consecutive fiscal years or portions thereof designated by the Committee over which performance units are to be earned. At the conclusion of a particular award cycle, the Committee will determine the number of performance units granted to a participant that have been earned and will deliver to such participant: (i) the number of shares of Common Stock equal to the number of performance units determined by the Committee to have been earned; and/or (ii) the cash equal to the fair market value of such shares. The Committee may, in its discretion, permit participants to defer the receipt of performance units, provided that the election to defer payment is made prior to the commencement of the applicable award cycle.

        The Committee will have the authority to determine the officers and employees to whom, and the time or times at which, performance units will be awarded, the number of performance units to be awarded to any participant, the duration of the award cycle and any other terms and conditions of an award. In the event that a participant's employment is terminated (other than for Cause [as defined in the Incentive Plan]) or in the event of the participant's retirement, the Committee will have the discretion to waive, in whole or in part, any or all remaining payment limitations, provided, however,

27



that the satisfaction of any applicable Performance Goals by an employee who has been determined by the Committee to be subject to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (see "Federal Income Tax Consequences" below) cannot be waived unless such employee's employment is terminated by death or disability.

Tax Offset Bonuses

        At the time an award is made under the Incentive Plan or at any time thereafter, the Committee may grant to the participant receiving such award the right to receive a cash payment in an amount specified by the Committee, to be paid at such time or times (if ever) as the award results in compensation income to the participant, for the purpose of assisting the participant to pay the resulting taxes, all as determined by the Committee and on such other terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine.

Administration

        The Incentive Plan will be administered by the Committee. The Committee must be composed of not less than two Disinterested Persons (as defined in the Incentive Plan), each of whom shall be an "outside director" for purposes of Section 162(m)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. Among other things, the Committee will have the authority to select officers and employees to whom awards may be granted, to determine the type of award as well as the number of shares of the Corporation's Common Stock to be covered by each award, to determine the terms and conditions of any such awards, to modify the terms of any award (subject to limitation), to determine if an award may be settled in cash or Common Stock and to determine to what extent amounts payable with respect to an award shall be deferred. The Committee also will have the authority to adopt, alter and repeal such administrative rules, guidelines and practices governing the Incentive Plan as it deems advisable, to interpret the terms and provisions of the Incentive Plan and any awards issued thereunder and to otherwise supervise the administration of the Incentive Plan. All decisions made by the Committee pursuant to the Incentive Plan will be final and binding.

Amendment and Discontinuance

        The Incentive Plan may be amended, altered or discontinued by the Board of Directors, but no amendment, alteration or discontinuance may be made that would: (i) impair the rights of an optionee under an option or a recipient of a stock appreciation right, restricted stock award or performance unit award previously granted without the optionee's or recipient's consent, except such an amendment made to qualify the Incentive Plan for the exemption provided by Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Rule 16b-3"), or (ii) disqualify the Incentive Plan from the exemption provided by Rule 16b-3. The Incentive Plan may not be amended without shareholder approval to the extent such approval is required by law or agreement.

        The Incentive Plan provides that in the event of any change in corporate capitalization such as a stock split, or a corporate transaction such as any merger, consolidation, separation, spin-off or other distribution of stock or property, or any reorganization or partial or complete liquidation of the Corporation, the Committee or Board may make such substitution or adjustment in the aggregate number and kind of shares reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan, in the number, kind and option price of shares subject to outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights, and in the number and kind of shares subject to other outstanding awards granted under the Incentive Plan as may be determined to be appropriate by the Committee or Board, in their sole discretion. The Incentive Plan also provides that in the event of a Change in Control of the Corporation, as defined in the Incentive Plan: (i) any stock appreciation rights and stock options outstanding as of the date of the Change in Control, other than stock appreciation rights held by an individual actually subject to Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which have not been outstanding for at least six

28



months on such date, which are not then exercisable and vested will become fully exercisable and vested; (ii) the restrictions and deferral limitations applicable to restricted stock will lapse and such restricted stock will become free of all restrictions and fully vested; (iii) all performance units will be considered to be earned and payable in full and any deferral or other restrictions will lapse and such performance units will be settled in cash as promptly as practicable; and (iv) stock options may be surrendered, subject to certain limitations, at any time during the 60-day period following a Change in Control, for a cash payment equal to the spread between the exercise price of the option and the Change in Control Price (as defined in the Incentive Plan).

Term

        The Incentive Plan will terminate fifteen (15) years after the effective date of the plan.

Receipt of Plan Benefits

        Because awards under the Incentive Plan are discretionary, it is not possible to determine what awards the Committee will grant under the plan, as amended, in the future. A partial summary of awards granted under the Incentive Plan during the Corporation's fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, is set forth in the table below. Awards of options, performance units and shares of restricted stock were made to the executives of the Corporation listed in the "Summary Compensation Table" in 2003. Information on those awards can be found as follows: (i) information regarding option grants can be found under "Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year"; and (ii) information regarding awards of restricted stock and performance units can be found in the "Salary" and "Bonus" columns and related footnotes, respectively, under "Summary Compensation Table." No stock appreciation rights were issued under the plan in 2003.

Name and Position

  Dollar
Value(1)

  Options to
Purchase
Common Stock

  Shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to Performance Units(2)
  Restricted
Stock

All Executive Officers, as a group   $ 1,194,344   896,000   152,007   -0-

Nonexecutive Officer and Employee Group

 

$

714,027

 

287,000

 

34,048

 

-0-

(1)
The value of the stock options is their potential realizable value, which represents the maximum gain if held for the full term, assuming a 10% annual appreciation rate. Using this method, the dollar value of the stock options awarded to executive officers as a group is $1,194,347 (assuming a 5% annual appreciation rate, the dollar value of the stock options would be $608,343) and the dollar value of the stock options awarded to nonexecutive officers and employees is $714,027 (assuming a 5% annual appreciation rate, the dollar value of the options would be $323,133). Gains, if any, are dependent upon the actual performance of the Common Stock and the timing of any sale of the Common Stock received upon exercising the options. The fair market value of the Common Stock component of the performance units on the date of award was calculated by multiplying the number of shares by $5.1296, the average closing price of the Corporation's Common Stock from January 2003 through December 2003.

(2)
The performance units consisted of an award of Common Stock (shown in the chart above) and cash in the amount of $814,776 to the executive officers as a group and $76,597 to the nonexecutive officers and employees.

29


Federal Income Tax Consequences

        The following discussion is intended only as a brief summary of the federal income tax rules that are generally relevant to stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and performance units. The laws governing the tax aspects of awards are highly technical, and such laws are subject to change.

        A.    Nonqualified Options and Stock Appreciation Rights.    Upon the grant of a nonqualified option (with or without a stock appreciation right), the optionee will not recognize any taxable income and the Corporation will not be entitled to a deduction. Upon the exercise of such an option or a stock appreciation right, the excess of the fair market value of the shares acquired on the exercise of the option over the option price (the "spread"), or the consideration paid to the optionee upon exercise of the stock appreciation rights, will constitute compensation taxable to the optionee as ordinary income. In determining the amount of the spread or the amount of consideration paid to the optionee, the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise is used, except that in the case of an optionee subject to the six-month, short-swing profit recovery provisions of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act (generally executive officers and directors of the Corporation), the fair market value will be determined six months after the date on which the option was granted (if such date is later than the exercise date) unless such optionee elects to be taxed based on the fair market value at the date of exercise. Any such election (a "Section 83(b) election") must be made and filed with the IRS within 30 days after exercise in accordance with the regulations under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Corporation, in computing its federal income tax, will generally be entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to the compensation taxable to the optionee.

        B.    Incentive Stock Options.    An optionee will not recognize taxable income on the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. However, the spread at exercise will constitute an item includible in alternative minimum taxable income, and thereby may subject the optionee to the alternative minimum tax. Such alternative minimum tax may be payable even though the optionee receives no cash upon the exercise of his incentive stock option with which to pay such tax. Upon the disposition of shares of stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option after the later of (a) two years from the date of grant of the incentive stock option, or (b) one year after the transfer of the shares to the optionee (the "Incentive Stock Option Holding Period"), the optionee will recognize long-term capital gain or loss, as the case may be, measured by the difference between the stock's selling price and the exercise price. The Corporation is not entitled to any tax deduction by reason of the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option, or by reason of a disposition of stock received upon exercise of an incentive stock option if the Incentive Stock Option Holding Period is satisfied. Different rules apply if the optionee disposes of the shares of stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option before the expiration of the Incentive Stock Option Holding Period.

        C.    Restricted Stock.    A participant who is granted restricted stock may make a Section 83(b) election to have the grant taxed as compensation income at the date of receipt, with the result that any future appreciation (or depreciation) in the value of the shares of stock granted will be taxed as a capital gain (or loss) upon a subsequent sale of the shares. However, if the participant does not make a Section 83(b) election, then the grant will be taxed as compensation income at the full fair market value on the date that the restrictions imposed on the shares expire. Unless a participant makes a Section 83(b) election, any dividends paid on stock subject to the restrictions are compensation income to the participant and compensation expense to the Corporation. The Corporation is generally entitled to an income tax deduction for any compensation income taxed to the participant, subject to the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).

        D.    Performance Units.    A participant who has been granted a performance unit award will not realize taxable income until the applicable award cycle expires and the participant is in receipt of the stock subject to the award or an equivalent amount of cash, at which time such participant will realize

30



ordinary income equal to the full fair market value of the shares delivered or the amount of cash paid. At that time, the Corporation generally will be allowed a corresponding tax deduction equal to the compensation taxable to the award recipient, subject to the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).

        The Incentive Plan has been designed to take into account recent tax law changes that impose limits on the ability of a public corporation to claim tax deductions for compensation paid to certain highly compensated executives. Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) generally denies a corporate tax deduction for annual compensation exceeding $1 million paid to the Chief Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated officers of a public corporation. Certain types of compensation, including options granted with a fair-market-value exercise price, and performance-based stock awards, are generally excluded from this deduction limit. The Corporation does not expect that it will pay compensation in excess of the $1 million limit in the foreseeable future. However, in an effort to ensure that options under the Incentive Plan will qualify for the exclusion for performance-based compensation, and to permit the Committee to grant other awards under the Incentive Plan that will also so qualify, the amendment to the Incentive Plan is being submitted to shareholders for approval at the 2004 Annual Meeting. By approving the amendment to the Incentive Plan, the shareholders will be approving, among other things, the performance measures and eligibility requirements with respect to various stock awards contained therein for purposes of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).

        The Committee will have the authority to grant awards (other than options) under the Incentive Plan that are not subject to performance goals and therefore will not qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Finally, under certain circumstances such as death, disability and Change in Control (all as defined in the Incentive Plan), awards that would otherwise so qualify may result in the payment of compensation that is not qualified under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).

Vote Required for Approval

        Adoption of the proposed amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the amendment, provided that the total number of votes cast on the proposal is greater than 50% of the total number of shares entitled to vote on the proposal.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Code of Ethics

        The Corporation has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer), Chief Financial Officer (our principal financial officer) and principal accounting officer or controller. You can access the Code of Ethics in the "Investor Relations" section of our website at www.hecla-mining.com under "Corporate Governance" or by writing to us at Hecla Mining Company, 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815-9408, Attn: Investor Relations.

Director Communications

        Shareholders wishing to communicate with the Board of Directors, or with a specific Board member, may do so by writing to the Board of Directors, or to the particular Board member, and delivering the communication in person or mailing it to: Board of Directors, c/o Michael B. White, Corporate Secretary, Hecla Mining Company, 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815-9408. From time to time, the Board of Directors may change the process by means of which shareholders may communicate with the Board of Directors or its members. Please refer to the Corporation's website at www.hecla-mining.com for any changes in this process.

31



PROVISIONS OF THE CORPORATION'S BY-LAWS
WITH RESPECT TO SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS
FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS

        The Corporation's By-Laws establish procedures governing the eligibility of nominees for election to the Board of Directors of the Corporation and the proposal of business to be considered by the shareholders at an Annual Meeting of Shareholders. For nominations or other business to be properly brought before an Annual Meeting of Shareholders by a shareholder, the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation. To be timely, a shareholder's notice shall be delivered to the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's Annual Meeting of Shareholders; provided, however, that in the event the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders is advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the 120th day prior to such Annual Meeting of Shareholders and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such Annual Meeting of Shareholders or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Adjournment of a meeting shall not commence a new time period for giving a shareholder's notice as described above. Such shareholder's notice shall set forth: (a) as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director, all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, as amended, and Rule 14a-11 thereunder, including such person's written consent to being named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected; (b) as to any other business that the shareholder proposes to bring before the meeting, who has not otherwise complied with the rules and regulations under the Exchange Act for the inclusion of a shareholder proposal in the Corporation's proxy materials, a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting and any material interest in such business of such shareholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made; and (c) as to the shareholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made: (1) the name and address of such shareholder, as they appear on the Corporation's books, and of such beneficial owner, and (2) the class and number of shares of the Corporation which are owned beneficially and of record by such shareholder and such beneficial owner. The chairman of the meeting shall have the power and duty to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed to be brought before the meeting was made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the By-Laws and, if any proposed nomination or business is not in compliance with the By-Laws, to declare that such defective proposal shall be disregarded. The foregoing time limits also apply in determining whether notice is timely for purposes of rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the exercise of discretionary voting authority.


SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2005 ANNUAL MEETING

        The Corporation will review shareholder proposals intended to be included in the Corporation's proxy materials for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which are received by the Corporation at its principal executive offices no later than December 3, 2004, subject to the By-Law provision discussed above. Such proposals must be submitted in writing and should be sent to the attention of the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation. The Corporation will comply with Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act with respect to any proposal that meets its requirements.

32




ANNUAL REPORT

        The Corporation's Annual Report to Shareholders, consisting of the Corporation's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, and other information, is being mailed to shareholders with this Proxy Statement. Shareholders of record may obtain a copy of the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K"), without cost by: (i) written request to Attn: Investor Relations; or (ii) requesting a copy through the Corporation's website at www.hecla-mining.com under "Investor Relations" and then selecting "Information Request." In addition, a shareholder may also view the Annual Report on the Corporation's website. The Annual Report on Form 10-K is not part of the proxy solicitation materials for the Annual Meeting.


OTHER BUSINESS

        As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board of Directors is not aware of any matters that will be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than those described above. However, should other business properly be brought before the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted thereon at the discretion of the persons acting thereunder.

    By Order of the Board of Directors

 

 

Michael B. White
Corporate Secretary

April 2, 2004

33




APPENDIX A

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND DIRECTORS
NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER

HECLA MINING COMPANY
February 25, 2004

PURPOSE

        The Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee shall seek and recommend to the Board qualified candidates for election or appointment to the Company's Board of Directors and standing committees of the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee shall also take a leadership role in shaping and recommending to the Board of Directors corporate governance and practices and monitoring corporate compliance with these policies and practices.

MEMBERSHIP

        The Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors shall be comprised of no less than three directors, each of whom satisfy the independence requirements of any applicable laws and regulations. The members of the Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee shall be appointed and replaced by the Board of Directors.


MEETINGS

        The Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee shall meet at least once each year or more frequently as circumstances dictate.


DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

        The Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee shall:

A.    Corporate Governance

B.    Directors Nominating

A-1



C.    Additional Powers and Responsibilities

A-2



APPENDIX B


AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

HECLA MINING COMPANY
Amended, February 25, 2004

PURPOSE

        The Audit Committee will assist the Board of Directors (the "Board") in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities. To do this, the Audit Committee will review: (i) the integrity of the Company's financial statements; (ii) the independent auditor's qualifications and independence; (iii) the performance of the Company's system of internal audit function and the independent auditor; and (iv) the Company's compliance with laws and regulations, including disclosure controls and procedures.

MEMBERSHIP

        The Audit Committee shall be comprised of no less than three directors, each of whom satisfy the independence and experience requirements of any applicable laws and regulations. The members of the Audit Committee shall be nominated by the Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee and be appointed and replaced by the Board of Directors. An Audit Committee member may not simultaneously serve on the audit committees of more than two other public companies, unless the Board of Directors determines that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such Director to effectively serve on the Audit Committee. Each member will be "financially literate" (or will become so within a reasonable time after his or her appointment to the Audit Committee), and at least one member of the Audit Committee shall have accounting or related financial management expertise as determined by the Board in its business judgment. The Board may presume that a person who satisfies the definition of audit committee financial expert set out in Item 401(e) of Regulation S-K has accounting or related financial management expertise.

MEETINGS

        The Audit Committee shall meet at least four times each year or more frequently as circumstances dictate. As part of its oversight function, the Audit Committee shall meet regularly with management, internal auditors and the independent auditor in separate executive sessions to review the Company's financial statements and to discuss any matters that the Audit Committee or any of these groups believe should be discussed.

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

        The Audit Committee shall:

A.    Audit Committee Charter/Report


B.    Independent Auditor

B-1



C.    Internal Auditors and Management

B-2


D.    Financial Reporting and Risk Control


E.    Legal Compliance

B-3


B-4


PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
  HECLA MINING COMPANY
6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815-9408
  ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
May 7, 2004

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF
THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR LISTED IN ITEM 1 AND "FOR" PROPOSAL 2.

        The undersigned, revoking any previous proxies, hereby appoints ARTHUR BROWN and MICHAEL B. WHITE, and each of them, proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to attend the Corporation's Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 7, 2004, and any adjournments or postponements thereof, and there to vote the undersigned's shares of Common Stock of the Corporation on the following matters as described in the Board of Directors Proxy Statement for such Meeting, a copy of which has been received by the undersigned.

1.   ELECTION OF DIRECTORS   o   FOR all nominees listed below
(except as marked to the contrary below)
  o   WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
to vote for all nominees listed below

Ted Crumley

 

Charles L. McAlpine

 

Jorge E. Ordoñez C.

 

 

(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, put a line through that nominee's name.)

2.

 

PROPOSAL to approve the amendment of the Corporation's 1995 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the plan from 6,000,000 to 11,000,000.

o        FOR

 

o        AGAINST

 

o        ABSTAIN

3.

 

In their discretion on all other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

    This Proxy will be voted as specified. If no specification is made, this Proxy will be voted FOR the election of the three nominees for Director and FOR the adoption of Proposal 2

 

 

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE PROXY CARD USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Signature       Signature       DATE:     , 2004
   
     
     
 

NOTE: The proxy must be signed exactly as your name or names appear on this card. Executors, administrators, trustees, partners, etc. should give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer(s), who should specify the title(s) of such officer(s).




QuickLinks

INTRODUCTION
PURPOSES OF ANNUAL MEETING
VOTING AT ANNUAL MEETING
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
CERTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
AUDITOR FEES
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN(1)
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
COMPENSATION TABLES
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
OTHER BENEFITS
AMENDMENT TO THE CORPORATION'S 1995 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
PROVISIONS OF THE CORPORATION'S BY-LAWS WITH RESPECT TO SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2005 ANNUAL MEETING
ANNUAL REPORT
OTHER BUSINESS
APPENDIX A
MEETINGS
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
APPENDIX B
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER HECLA MINING COMPANY Amended, February 25, 2004