|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES
|
|||||||||||||||||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
|||||||||||||||||
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|||||||||||||||||
FORM 10-Q |
|||||||||||||||||
(Mark One) |
|||||||||||||||||
[x] |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
||||||||||||||||
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
||||||||||||||||
For the transition period from to |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission file number 001-14157 |
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) |
|||||||||||||||||
Delaware |
|
|
36-2669023 |
||||||||||||||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 4000, Chicago, Illinois 60602 |
|||||||||||||||||
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (312) 630-1900 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
No |
|||||||||||||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. |
[x] |
[ ] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). |
[x] |
[ ] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. |
|||||||||||||||||
Large accelerated filer |
[x] |
Accelerated filer |
[ ] |
Non-accelerated filer |
[ ] |
Smaller reporting company |
[ ] |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). |
[ ] |
[x] |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class |
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016 |
||||||||||||||
Common Shares, $0.01 par value |
|
|
102,720,328 Shares |
||||||||||||||
Series A Common Shares, $0.01 par value |
|
|
7,222,450 Shares |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q |
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2016 |
|
|
|
Index |
Page No. |
|
|
Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures |
|
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.’s (“TDS”) interim consolidated financial statements and notes included herein, and with the description of TDS’ business, its audited consolidated financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in TDS’ Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) for the year ended December 31, 2015. Analysis of TDS’ financial results compares the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. Calculated amounts and percentages are based on the underlying actual numbers rather than the numbers rounded to millions as presented.
This report contains statements that are not based on historical facts, including the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “expects” and similar words. These statements constitute and represent “forward looking statements” as this term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be significantly different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. See Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement for additional information.
TDS uses certain “non-GAAP financial measures” throughout the MD&A. A discussion of the reason TDS determines these metrics to be useful and a reconciliation of these measures to their most directly comparable measures determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) are included in the Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures section within the MD&A of this Form 10-Q Report.
TDS is a diversified telecommunications company that provides high-quality communications services to approximately 6 million customers nationwide. TDS provides wireless services through its 83%-owned subsidiary, United States Cellular Corporation (“U.S. Cellular”). TDS also provides wireline services, cable services and hosted and managed services (“HMS”), through its wholly-owned subsidiary, TDS Telecommunications Corporation (“TDS Telecom”). TDS’ segments operate almost entirely in the United States. See Note 11 — Business Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for summary financial information on each business segment. |
|
TDS Mission and Strategy
TDS’ mission is to provide outstanding communications services to its customers and meet the needs of its shareholders, its people, and its communities. In pursuing this mission, TDS seeks to profitably grow its businesses, create opportunities for its associates and employees, and steadily build value over the long-term for its shareholders. Across all of its businesses, TDS is focused on providing exceptional customer experiences through best-in-class services and products and superior customer service.
TDS’ long-term strategy calls for the majority of its capital to be reinvested in its operating businesses to strengthen their competitive positions, while still returning value to TDS shareholders through the payment of a regular quarterly cash dividend and share repurchases.
In 2016, TDS is working to build shareholder value by continuing to execute on its strategies to build strong, competitive businesses providing high-quality, data-focused services and products. Strategic efforts include:
All defined terms in this MD&A are used as defined in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and additional terms are defined below:
Results of Operations — TDS Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
||||||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 vs. 2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 vs. 2015 |
|||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
U.S. Cellular |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(6)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(2)% |
||||||
|
TDS Telecom |
|
|
|
|
|
(4)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
||||||
|
All other1 |
|
|
|
|
|
(37)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(43)% |
||||||
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
(5)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
|||||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
U.S. Cellular |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
9% |
||||||
|
TDS Telecom |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
||||||
|
All other1 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
(38)% |
|
|
|
|
|
25% |
||||||
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
7% |
|||||
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
U.S. Cellular |
|
|
|
|
|
(88)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(92)% |
||||||
|
TDS Telecom |
|
|
|
|
|
(32)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(17)% |
||||||
|
All other1 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
41% |
|
|
|
|
|
>(100)% |
||||||
|
|
Total operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
(79)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(81)% |
|||||
Investment and other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
(5)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
||||||
|
Interest and dividend income |
|
|
|
|
|
56% |
|
|
|
|
|
57% |
||||||
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(20)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(23)% |
||||||
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
>100% |
|
|
|
|
|
>(100)% |
||||||
|
|
Total investment and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
(25)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(24)% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
(72)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(77)% |
|||||||
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(69)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(75)% |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
(74)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(78)% |
|||||||
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
(70)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(79)% |
||||||
Net income attributable to TDS shareholders |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(75)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(78)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(25)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(15)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
1 |
Consists of corporate and other operations and intercompany eliminations. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, TDS recognized an incremental gain compared to U.S. Cellular of $12 million on a tower sale as a result of lower asset basis in the assets disposed. |
|
|
The decrease in operating revenues is due primarily to the impact of $58 million in revenue recognized by U.S. Cellular from expired rewards points in the third quarter of 2015. |
The increase in operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was due primarily to the absence of significant offsetting gains recognized from sales and exchanges of businesses and licenses. Such gains were $277 million in 2015 compared to $17 million in 2016. |
Refer to individual segment discussions in this MD&A for additional details on operating revenues and expenses at the segment level.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities represents TDS’ share of net income from entities in which it has a noncontrolling interest and that are accounted for by the equity method. TDS’ investment in the Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership (“LA Partnership”) contributed $17 million and $19 million to Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $57 million and $58 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See Note 7 — Investments in Unconsolidated Entities in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Interest and dividend income
Interest and dividend income increased due to imputed interest income recognized on equipment installment plans of $13 million and $9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $37 million and $24 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Interest expense
Interest expense increased due primarily to U.S. Cellular’s issuance of $300 million of 7.25% Senior Notes due 2064 in November 2015 and borrowing of $225 million on U.S. Cellular’s senior term loan facility that was drawn in July 2015.
Income tax expense
TDS’ effective tax rate on Income before income taxes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 46.6% and 43.6%, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was 42.1% and 40.3%. The effective tax rates for the three and nine month periods primarily reflect a normalized combined rate of federal and state taxes, but are also affected by certain discrete items in each period which increase or decrease the effective tax rate for each period. Because certain discrete items are not annualized, these rates may not be indicative of the annual rate for 2016.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
||||
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
U.S. Cellular noncontrolling public shareholders’ |
$ |
$ |
|
$ |
$ |
||||||||
|
Noncontrolling shareholders’ or partners’ |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
$ |
$ |
|
$ |
$ |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax includes the noncontrolling public shareholders’ share of U.S. Cellular’s net income and the noncontrolling shareholders’ or partners’ share of certain U.S. Cellular subsidiaries’ net income (loss). The decrease from 2015 to 2016 for both the three and nine month periods is due to lower income from U.S. Cellular and certain other partnerships in 2016.
Three Months Ended
Net income and Adjusted EBITDA decreased due primarily to the impact of revenue recognized from expired rewards points in the third quarter of 2015. Nine Months Ended In addition to the impact of the expired rewards points, Net income decreased due primarily to a lesser amount of gains from sales and exchanges of businesses and licenses recognized in 2016 compared to 2015. Such gains are not included as a component of Adjusted EBITDA and, as a result, Adjusted EBITDA did not decline as much as Net income. |
|
*Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. |
|
Business Overview
U.S. Cellular owns, operates, and invests in wireless markets throughout the United States. U.S. Cellular is an 83%-owned subsidiary of TDS. U.S. Cellular’s strategy is to attract and retain wireless customers through a value proposition comprised of a high-quality network, outstanding customer service, and competitive devices, plans, and pricing, all provided with a local focus.
OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
YTD 2015 |
YTD 2016 |
|
|||
|
Postpaid Connections |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Gross Additions |
591,000 |
586,000 |
|
||
|
|
Net Additions |
43,000 |
75,000 |
|
||
|
|
Churn |
1.41% |
1.27% |
|
||
|
|
Handsets |
1.32% |
1.17% |
|
||
|
|
Connected Devices |
2.31% |
1.97% |
|
||
|
|
Connections – end of period |
4,341,000 |
4,484,000 |
|
||
|
Prepaid Net Additions |
32,000 |
93,000 |
|
|||
|
Retail Connections – end of period |
4,721,000 |
4,964,000 |
|
|||
The increase in postpaid net additions in 2016 is driven by improvement in postpaid churn. Postpaid churn declined over the past two years due to enhancements in the customer experience and improvement in the overall credit mix of gross additions. In addition, U.S. Cellular continues to see growth in postpaid net additions from connected devices. The increase in prepaid net additions was due primarily to successful promotional activity. |
|||||||
Smartphones represented 92% and 87% of total postpaid handset sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As a result, smartphone penetration increased to 78% of the postpaid handset base as of September 30, 2016, up from 72% a year ago. Smartphone customers generally use more data than feature phone customers, thereby driving growth in service revenues. Continued growth in customer usage related to data services and products may result in increased operating expenses and the need for additional investment in spectrum, network capacity and network enhancements. |
1 The discontinuation of the loyalty rewards points program had the effect of increasing Postpaid ARPU/ABPU and Postpaid ARPA/ABPA by $4.48 and $11.34 for the three months ended September 2015, respectively, and $1.50 and $3.74 for the nine months ended September 2015, respectively.
2 Postpaid ABPU and Postpaid ABPA are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. |
Postpaid ARPU and Postpaid ARPA decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 due primarily to the impact of the loyalty rewards points program that was discontinued in September 2015, industry-wide price competition, and discounts on shared data plans provided to customers on equipment installment plans and those providing their own device at the time of activation or renewal. Postpaid ARPU also decreased due to growth in the number of connected devices, which on a per unit basis contribute less revenue than handsets. These factors were partially offset by the impacts of continued adoption of smartphones and the related increase in service revenues from data usage.
Equipment installment plans increase equipment sales revenue as customers pay for their wireless devices in installments at a total device price that is generally higher than the device price offered to customers in conjunction with alternative plans that are subject to a service contract. Equipment installment plans also have the impact of reducing service revenues as many equipment installment plans provide for reduced monthly access charges. In order to show the trends in total service and equipment revenues received, U.S. Cellular has presented Postpaid ABPU and Postpaid ABPA, which are calculated as Postpaid ARPU and Postpaid ARPA plus average monthly equipment installment plan billings per connection and account, respectively.
Equipment installment plan billings increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to increased adoption of equipment installment plans by postpaid customers. Postpaid ABPU and ABPA decreased in 2016 as the increase in equipment installment plan billings was more than offset by the decline in Postpaid ARPU and ARPA discussed above. U.S. Cellular expects the adoption and penetration of equipment installment plans to continue to increase as plan offerings shift more toward equipment installment plans. Effective in September 2016, new postpaid handset sales to retail consumers are made under equipment installment plans; business and government customers may purchase equipment under either installment plans or alternative plans that are subject to a service contract.
Financial Overview — U.S. Cellular
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 vs. |
|
|
|
|
2016 vs. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2015 |
||||
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Retail service |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(14)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(10)% |
|||||||
Inbound roaming |
|
|
|
|
|
(25)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(20)% |
|||||||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
12% |
|
|
|
|
|
7% |
|||||||
|
Service revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
(14)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(10)% |
||||||
Equipment sales |
|
|
|
|
|
38% |
|
|
|
|
|
42% |
|||||||
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
(6)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
System operations (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
|||||||
Cost of equipment sold |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
|
|
|
|
2% |
|||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Operating cash flow* |
|
|
|
|
|
(21)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(9)% |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
2% |
|
|
|
|
|
3% |
|||||||
(Gain) loss on asset disposals, net |
|
|
|
|
|
>100% |
|
|
|
|
|
33% |
|||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net |
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|||||||
(Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges |
|
|
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
|
|
89% |
|||||||
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
9% |
||||||
Operating income |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(88)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(92)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(73)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(78)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Adjusted EBITDA* |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(16)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(5)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(23)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(18)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M - Percentage change not meaningful |
Service revenues consist of:
Equipment revenues consist of:
|
Key components of changes in the statement of operations line items were as follows:
Total operating revenues
Service revenues decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of (i) a decrease in retail service revenues driven by the $58 million impact of the loyalty rewards program that ended in September 2015; (ii) industry-wide price competition, including discounts on shared data plans provided to customers on equipment installment plans and those providing their own device at the time of activation or renewal; and (iii) reductions in inbound roaming revenues driven by lower roaming rates. Such reductions were partially offset by an increase in the average connections base and continued adoption of smartphones and shared data plans.
Federal USF revenue was $23 million and $69 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, which remained flat when compared to the same periods last year. Pursuant to the FCC's Reform Order (“Reform Order”), U.S. Cellular’s Federal USF support was to be phased down at the rate of 20% per year beginning July 1, 2012. The Phase II Mobility Fund was not operational as of July 2014 and, therefore, as provided by the Reform Order, the phase down was suspended at 60% of the baseline amount. U.S. Cellular will continue to receive USF support at the 60% level until the FCC takes further action. At this time, U.S. Cellular cannot predict the changes that the FCC might make to the USF high cost support program and, accordingly, cannot predict whether such changes will have a material adverse effect on U.S. Cellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Equipment sales revenues increased for the three months ended September 30, 2016 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015 due primarily to a shift in mix to sales under equipment installment plans together with an increase in average revenue per device sold under such plans. Equipment installment plan sales contributed $192 million and $89 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Equipment sales revenues increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015 due to an overall increase in the number of devices sold, and a shift in mix to sales under equipment installment plans together with an increase in average revenue per device sold under such plans. Equipment installment plan sales contributed $501 million and $226 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Equipment installment plan connections represented 40% and 23% of total postpaid connections as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
System operations expenses decreased by modest amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 when compared to the same periods last year.
U.S. Cellular expects system operations expenses to increase in the future to support the continued growth in cell sites and other network facilities as it continues to add capacity, enhance quality and deploy new technologies as well as to support increases in total customer data usage. However, these increases are expected to be offset to some extent by cost savings generated by shifting data traffic to the 4G LTE network from the 3G network.
Cost of equipment sold
Cost of equipment sold decreased for the three months ended September 30, 2016 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015 as a result of a decrease in the average cost per device sold driven by the lower cost of smartphones and to a lesser extent the lower sales of accessories. Cost of equipment sold included $200 million and $113 million related to equipment installment plan sales for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Loss on equipment, defined as Equipment sales revenues less Cost of equipment sold, was $41 million and $114 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.
Cost of equipment sold increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily as the result of a 4% increase in devices sold, partially offset by a decrease in the average cost per device sold. Cost of equipment sold included $534 million and $305 million related to equipment installment plan sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Loss on equipment was $144 million and $318 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by modest amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 when compared to the same periods last year. This decrease was attributable to various expense reductions that were partially offset by a $13 million expense recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the termination of a naming rights agreement.
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion expenses
The increases in Depreciation, amortization, and accretion expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 were mainly driven by the increase in amortization expense related to billing system upgrades.
(Gain) loss on asset disposals, net
The increases in Loss on asset disposals were primarily driven by more disposals of certain network assets during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 when compared to the same periods last year.
(Gain) loss on sale of business and other exit costs, net
The net gain for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was due primarily to a $108 million gain recognized on sale of towers and certain related contracts, assets and liabilities.
(Gain) loss on license sales and exchanges, net
The net gains in 2016 and 2015 were due to gains recognized on license exchange transactions with third parties. See Note 5 — Acquisitions, Divestitures and Exchanges in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Business Overview
TDS Telecom operates in three reportable segments: Wireline, Cable and HMS. The overall strategy for the Wireline and Cable businesses is to own the best data pipes in each market in order to capitalize on data growth and the need for higher broadband speeds and leverage that growth by bundling services with video and voice. In addition, through its HMS business, TDS Telecom provides a wide range of Information Technology (“IT”) services including colocation, dedicated hosting, hosted application management, cloud computing services and the planning, engineering, procurement, installation, sales and management of IT infrastructure hardware solutions.
OPERATIONS |
|
Financial Overview — TDS Telecom
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 vs. |
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2015 |
|||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Wireline |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
- |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(1)% |
||||||
|
Cable |
|
|
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
|
|
3% |
||||||
|
HMS |
|
|
|
|
|
(17)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(3)% |
||||||
|
Intra-company elimination |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
||||||
|
|
TDS Telecom operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
(4)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Wireline |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
||||||
|
Cable |
|
|
|
|
|
8% |
|
|
|
|
|
8% |
||||||
|
HMS |
|
|
|
|
|
(14)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(3)% |
||||||
|
Intra-company elimination |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
||||||
|
|
TDS Telecom operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
|
|
|
|
1% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
TDS Telecom operating income |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(32)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(17)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(20)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(15)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA* |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(7)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(4)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(29)% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
(12)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Numbers may not foot due to rounding. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Supplemental Information Relating to Non-GAAP Financial Measures within this MD&A for a reconciliation of this measure. |
Three and Nine Months Ended Operating revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased as declines in HMS equipment revenues were partially offset by increases in revenues from Cable operations. |
Total operating expenses
Operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2016 decreased due to lower HMS cost of equipment and products on reduced equipment sales partially offset by higher video programming costs and employee expenses.
Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 increased due to higher video programming costs and employee expenses.
Business Overview
TDS Telecom’s Wireline business provides broadband, video and voice services. These services are provided to residential, commercial, and wholesale customers in a mix of rural, small town and suburban markets, with the largest concentration of its customers in the Upper Midwest and the Southeast. TDS Telecom’s strategy is to offer its residential customers broadband, video, and voice services through value-added bundling. In its commercial business, TDS Telecom’s strategic focus is on small- to medium-sized businesses and its sales efforts emphasize advanced IP-based voice and data services.
Operational Overview
Wireline residential broadband customers, comprised mainly of ILEC connections, are increasingly choosing higher speeds. |
In total, Wireline increased residential revenue per connection by 3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. |
|
|
||
Total residential connections increased as a 44% increase in IPTV connections was partially offset by a 3% decline in voice connections. |
|
Total commercial connections decreased by 3% as declines in voice and broadband connections outpaced the 4% growth in managedIP connections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
||||||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 vs. 2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 vs. 2015 |
||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Residential |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
4% |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
3% |
||||||||
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
(4)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(4)% |
||||||||
Wholesale |
|
|
|
|
|
(2)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(3)% |
||||||||
|
Service revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
|||||||
Equipment and product sales |
|
|
|
|
|
(9)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
||||||||
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Cost of services (excluding Depreciation, amortization and accretion reported below) |
|
|
|
|
|
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
2% |
||||||||
Cost of equipment and products |
|
|
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|