SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

Report of Foreign Private Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a -16 or 15d -16 of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Report on Form 6-K dated August 4, 2016

(Commission File No. 1-13202)

Nokia Corporation

Karaportti 3

FI-02610 Espoo

Finland

(Name and address of registrant’s principal executive office)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Enclosures:

Nokia stock exchange release dated August 4, 2016: TECHNICAL CORRECTION to the pdf attached to Nokia’s financial report for Q2 and half year 2016 and a specification to the language of the outlook section of the Finnish language financial report

TECHNICAL CORRECTION to the pdf attached to Nokia’s financial report for Q2 and half year 2016 and a specification to the language of the outlook section of the Finnish language financial report

Nokia Corporation
Stock Exchange Release
August 4, 2016 at 18:45 (CET +1)

TECHNICAL CORRECTION to the pdf attached to Nokia’s financial report for Q2 and half year 2016 and a specification to the language of the outlook section of the Finnish language financial report

Espoo, Finland — Nokia published its financial report for Q2 and half year 2016 at 8 am Finnish time on August 4, 2016. In the stock exchange release, Nokia published a summary of the report and indicated that the complete results report with tables was available on its website as a pdf document.

This pdf document included errors in two footnotes to selected tables of the document. On pages 59 and 62, footnote 3 to the tables incorrectly presented the “services net sales” figure attributable to the combined company for the periods Q2/2015 and Q1-Q2/2015 (EUR 2 220 million and EUR 4 342 million), respectively, whereas the correct figure should have reflected the numbers for Nokia on a standalone basis. Therefore, the correct “services net sales” figure for footnote 3 on page 59 is EUR 1 359 million (for Q2/2015) and for footnote 3 on page 62 EUR 2 625 million (for Q1-Q2/2015), respectively.

Additionally, a specification to the language of the outlook section of the Finnish language version of the financial report has been made to ensure alignment with the language of the outlook section of the English language version.

The corrected pdf document is attached to this stock exchange release and is also available at http://www.nokia.com/financials.

About Nokia

Nokia is a global leader in the technologies that connect people and things. Powered by the innovation of Nokia Bell Labs and Nokia Technologies, the company is at the forefront of creating and licensing the technologies that are increasingly at the heart of our connected lives.

With state-of-the-art software, hardware and services for any type of network, Nokia is uniquely positioned to help communication service providers, governments, and large enterprises deliver on the promise of 5G, the Cloud and the Internet of Things. http://www.nokia.com

1

Media Enquiries:
Nokia
Communications
Tel. +358 (0) 10 448 4900
Email: press.services@nokia.com

2

Financial Report for Q2 and Half Year 2016

Solid financial performance and raised cost savings target

Financial highlights

·             Non-IFRS net sales in Q2 2016 of EUR 5.7 billion (reported: EUR 5.6 billion). In the year-ago quarter, non-IFRS net sales would have been EUR 6.4 billion on a comparable combined company basis (reported: EUR 2.9 billion on a Nokia stand-alone basis).

·             Non-IFRS diluted EPS in Q2 2016 of EUR 0.03 (reported: EUR negative 0.12).

·             Raised annual cost savings target to approximately EUR 1.2 billion of total annual cost savings to be achieved in full year 2018, compared to the combined non-IFRS operating costs of Nokia and Alcatel-Lucent for full year 2015, excluding Nokia Technologies. Related to this, Nokia recorded approximately EUR 600 million of restructuring and associated charges in the second quarter 2016.

Nokia’s Networks business

·             11% year-on-year net sales decrease in Q2 2016. Consistent with our outlook for the wireless infrastructure market, net sales were weak in Mobile Networks within Ultra Broadband Networks, and accounted for approximately 80% of the overall decrease in Nokia’s Networks business. IP Networks and Applications also contributed to the decrease. This was partially offset by strong growth in Fixed Networks within Ultra Broadband Networks.

·             In Q2 2016, solid gross margin of 37.4% and operating margin of 6.0% were adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery. Excluding this, gross margin would have been approximately 38% and operating margin would have been nearly 7%.

Nokia Technologies

·             11% year-on-year net sales decrease in Q2 2016. Excluding the impact of non-recurring items that benefitted the year-ago quarter, Nokia Technologies net sales would have grown by approximately 10% year-on-year, primarily due to higher intellectual property licensing income from existing licensees.

·             Announced an expansion of the patent cross license agreement with Samsung on July 13, 2016 to cover certain additional patent portfolios, reinforcing Nokia’s leadership in technologies for the programmable world. The expansion of the agreement occurred subsequent to the end of the second quarter 2016, and therefore did not impact the second quarter of 2016 financials. Instead, the expanded agreement will have a positive impact to Nokia Technologies starting from the third quarter of 2016. Nokia expects total annualized net sales related to patent and brand licensing to grow to a run rate of approximately EUR 950 million by the end of 2016.

August 4, 2016

1

Q2 and January-June 2016 non-IFRS results. See note 1 to the interim financial statements for further details (1),(2)

Q2 and January-June 2016 reported results, unless otherwise specified. See note 1 to the interim financial statements for further details(1),(3)

2

(1)Results are as reported unless otherwise specified. The results information in this report is unaudited. Non-IFRS results exclude costs related to the Alcatel-Lucent transaction and related integration, goodwill impairment charges, intangible asset amortization and purchase price related items, restructuring and associated charges, and certain other items that may not be indicative of Nokia’s underlying business performance. For details, please refer to the Non-IFRS Exclusions section included in discussions of both the quarterly and year to date performance and note 2, “Non-IFRS to reported reconciliation”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report. A reconciliation of the Q2 2015 non-IFRS combined company results to the reported results can be found in the “Nokia provides recast segment results for 2015 reflecting new financial reporting structure” stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. Change in net sales at constant currency excludes the impact of changes in exchange rates in comparison to Euro, our reporting currency. For more information on currency exposures, please refer to note 1, “Basis of Preparation”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

(2)Combined company historicals reflect Nokia’s new operating and financial reporting structure, including Alcatel-Lucent, and are presented as additional information as described in the stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. For more information on the combined company historicals, please refer to note 1, “Basis of Preparation”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

(3)Nokia standalone historicals are the recasting of Nokia’s historical standalone financial results, reflecting Nokia’s updated segment reporting structure, excluding Alcatel-Lucent. Beginning from the first quarter 2016, Nokia results include those of Alcatel-Lucent on a consolidated basis. Accordingly, Nokia results beginning from the first quarter 2016 are not directly comparable to prior period Nokia standalone results.

Subsequent events

Nokia and Samsung expand their intellectual property cross license

On July 13, 2016, Nokia announced that Nokia and Samsung have agreed terms to expand their patent cross license agreement to cover certain additional patent portfolios of both parties. This agreement is in addition to the outcome of the arbitration between the two companies that was announced on February 1, 2016.

The agreement expands access for each company to patented technologies of the other and reinforces Nokia’s leadership in technologies for the programmable world. With this expansion, Nokia expects a positive impact to the net sales of Nokia Technologies starting from the third quarter of 2016.

With this expanded agreement, Nokia Technologies’ total annualized net sales related to patent and brand licensing is expected to grow to a run rate of approximately EUR 950 million by the end of 2016.

Non-IFRS results

Non-IFRS results provide meaningful supplemental information regarding underlying business performance

In addition to information on our reported IFRS results, we provide certain information on a non-IFRS, or underlying business performance, basis. We believe that our non-IFRS results provide meaningful supplemental information to both management and investors regarding Nokia’s underlying business performance by excluding the below-described items that may not be indicative of Nokia’s business operating results. These non-IFRS financial measures should not be viewed in isolation or as substitutes to the equivalent IFRS measure(s), but should be used in conjunction with the most directly comparable IFRS measure(s) in the reported results.

Non-IFRS results exclude costs related to the Alcatel-Lucent transaction and related integration, goodwill impairment charges, intangible asset amortization and purchase price related items, restructuring and associated charges, and certain other items that may not be indicative of Nokia’s underlying business performance. The non-IFRS exclusions are not allocated to the segments, and hence they are reported only at the Nokia consolidated level.

3

CEO statement

Nokia’s second quarter results were largely as expected and reflect solid execution in the midst of a challenging market and the ongoing integration of Alcatel-Lucent. When we announced our first quarter results, I said that we did not expect to see typical seasonal patterns in the first half of the year, and that prediction proved to be correct. Net sales were slightly up sequentially in Q2, while operating margin was slightly down, in part reflecting a meaningful negative impact from one of our major customers in Latin America.

During the quarter we continued to make excellent progress in many areas. We moved rapidly forward with our integration and cost savings efforts; saw robust growth in our Fixed Networks business; announced the acquisition of Gainspeed in order to accelerate our progress with cable operators; closed the acquisition of Withings; reached a licensing deal that will see the Nokia brand return to smartphones and tablets; and more.

I was particularly pleased that the work done in the second quarter to reach an agreement with Samsung on an expanded intellectual property licensing deal came to fruition. After the arbitration results were announced in February, we said that there was still more to come from Samsung and have now delivered on that, with the related financial impact starting in the third quarter.

The decline of our topline remains a concern, and reflects challenging market conditions. While we do not expect those conditions to improve in the near term, we believe we are well-positioned given the scope of our portfolio, focus on operational discipline, strengthening sales execution, and opportunities in the evolution from 4G towards 5G.

In fact, we are already starting to work with customers to help them move to 5G-ready architectures in the core, with a focus on software-defined networking and cloud technologies. As this process takes place, we expect there to be further evolution of 4G radio including more carrier aggregation in order to meet demands for capacity, speed and spectrum utilization. Our AirScale radio platform, which can support different LTE-Advanced Pro (4.5G) technologies and is ‘5G ready,’ is ideally suited to this environment.

We crossed the 95% ownership threshold of Alcatel-Lucent in June, allowing us to move to acquire the remaining shares and reach full ownership of Alcatel-Lucent, which we expect by the end of October. As our successful integration work continues and as we get increased granular visibility into the business, our confidence in our ability to deliver cost savings also increases. As a result, we are now targeting EUR 1.2 billion in total cost savings to be achieved in full year 2018. We have also continued the strategic review of our submarine cable business to determine the best long-term resolution for that business.

While plenty of hard work remains in front of us, we are making good progress and expect to see slight sequential improvement in both net sales and operating margin in our Networks business from the second quarter to the third, followed by significant improvement from the third to the fourth quarter.

Rajeev Suri
President and CEO

4

Nokia in Q2 2016 — Non-IFRS

Financial discussion

The following discussion is of Nokia’s results for the second quarter 2016, which comprise the results of Nokia’s businesses — Nokia’s Networks business and Nokia Technologies, as well as Group Common and Other. For more information on the recent changes to our reportable segments, please refer to note 3, “Segment information and eliminations”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report. Comparisons are given to the second quarter 2015 and first quarter 2016 results on a combined company basis, unless otherwise indicated.

This data has been prepared to reflect the financial results of the continuing operations of Nokia as if the new financial reporting structure had been in operation for the full year 2015. Certain accounting policy alignments, adjustments and reclassifications have been necessary, and these are explained in the “Basis of preparation” section of the stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. These adjustments include also reallocation of items of costs and expenses based on their nature and changes to the definition of the line items in the combined company accounting policies, which affect also numbers presented in these interim financial statements for 2015. For more information on the combined company historicals, please refer to note 1, “Basis of Preparation”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

Non-IFRS Net sales

Nokia non-IFRS net sales decreased 11% year-on-year and increased 1% sequentially. On a constant currency basis, Nokia non-IFRS net sales would have decreased 9% year-on-year and increased 2% sequentially.

Year-on-year discussion

The year-on-year decrease in Nokia non-IFRS net sales in the second quarter 2016 was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business.

Sequential discussion

The sequential increase in Nokia non-IFRS net sales in the second quarter 2016 was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business and Group Common and Other.

Non-IFRS Operating profit

Year-on-year discussion

Nokia non-IFRS operating profit decreased primarily due to lower non-IFRS gross profit and a net negative fluctuation in non-IFRS other income and expenses, partially offset by lower non-IFRS research and development (“R&D”) expenses and non-IFRS selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses.

5

The decrease in non-IFRS gross profit was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business and, to a lesser extent, Nokia Technologies, partially offset by Group Common and Other. In Q2 2016, non-IFRS gross profit was adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, as revenue was deferred while the related costs of sale were expensed as incurred.

The decrease in non-IFRS R&D expenses was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business and, to a lesser extent, Nokia Technologies and Group Common and Other.

The decrease in non-IFRS SG&A expenses was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business and, to a lesser extent, Group Common and Other, partially offset by Nokia Technologies.

Nokia non-IFRS other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 41 million in the second quarter 2016, compared to an income of EUR 74 million in the year-ago quarter. On a year-on-year basis, the change was primarily due to the absence of realized gains and losses related to certain of Nokia’s investments made through its venture funds. In Q2 2016, non-IFRS other income and expenses were adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, as certain provisions were recorded due to the risk of asset impairment.

Sequential discussion

Nokia non-IFRS operating profit decreased primarily due to a net negative fluctuation in non-IFRS other income and expenses and higher non-IFRS SG&A expenses, partially offset by lower non-IFRS R&D expenses.

The slight decrease in non-IFRS gross profit was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business, partially offset by Group Common and Other. In Q2 2016, non-IFRS gross profit was adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, as revenue was deferred while the related costs of sale were expensed as incurred.

The decrease in non-IFRS R&D expenses was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business.

The increase in non-IFRS SG&A expenses was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business and Nokia Technologies.

Nokia non-IFRS other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 41 million in the second quarter 2016, compared to an expense of EUR 15 million in the first quarter 2016. On a sequential basis, the change was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business, as well as the absence of realized gains and losses related to certain of Nokia’s investments made through its venture funds. In Q2 2016, non-IFRS other income and expenses were adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, as certain provisions were recorded due to the risk of asset impairment.

6

Nokia in Q2 2016 — Reported

Financial discussion

Net sales

Nokia net sales increased 91% year-on-year, compared to Nokia standalone net sales, and increased 2% sequentially. On a constant currency basis, Nokia net sales would have increased 93% year-on-year, compared to Nokia standalone net sales, and 2% sequentially.

Year-on-year discussion

The year-on-year increase in Nokia net sales in the second quarter 2016, compared to Nokia standalone net sales, was primarily due to growth in Nokia’s Networks business and Group Common and Other, primarily related to the acquisition of Alcatel-Lucent, partially offset by non-IFRS exclusions.

Sequential discussion

The sequential increase in Nokia net sales in the second quarter 2016 was primarily due to growth in Nokia’s Networks business and Group Common and Other, as well as reduced negative impact related to purchase price allocation adjustment related to the reduced valuation of deferred revenue that existed on Alcatel-Lucent’s balance sheet at the time of the acquisition.

Operating profit

Year-on-year discussion

In the second quarter 2016, Nokia generated an operating loss, compared to a Nokia standalone operating profit in the year-ago period. The change was primarily due to restructuring and associated charges and other net negative fluctuations in other income and expenses, higher R&D expenses and higher SG&A expenses, partially offset by higher gross profit, all of which related primarily to the acquisition of Alcatel-Lucent.

The increase in gross profit was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business and, to a lesser extent, Group Common and Other, partially offset by non-IFRS exclusions related to deferred revenue and to a lesser extent, the absence of a benefit recorded in the year-ago quarter, which related to a correction of items previously reported as cost of sales and reductions to accounts receivable. In Q2 2016, gross profit was adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, as revenue was deferred while the related costs of sale were expensed as incurred.

7

The increase in R&D expenses was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business, non-IFRS exclusions related to amortization of intangible assets and, to a lesser extent, Group Common and Other.

The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business, non-IFRS exclusions related to amortization of intangible assets, as well as transaction and integration related costs and, to a lesser extent, Group Common and Other and Nokia Technologies.

Nokia’s other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 643 million in the second quarter 2016, compared to an income of EUR 114 million in the year-ago period. The change was primarily related to non-IFRS exclusions attributable to higher restructuring and associated charges and, to a lesser extent, the absence of realized gains and losses related to certain of Nokia’s investments made through its venture funds. In Q2 2016, other income and expenses were adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, as certain provisions were recorded due to the risk of asset impairment.

Sequential discussion

Nokia operating profit decreased primarily due to restructuring and associated charges, partially offset by higher gross profit and, to a lesser extent, lower SG&A and R&D expenses.

The increase in gross profit was primarily due to lower non-IFRS exclusions related to the absence of an inventory revaluation as part of the Alcatel-Lucent purchase accounting, which negatively affected the first quarter 2016. In Q2 2016, gross profit was adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, as revenue was deferred while the related costs of sale were expensed as incurred.

The decrease in R&D expenses was primarily due to Nokia’s Networks business.

The decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily due to lower non-IFRS exclusions related to transaction and integration related costs.

Nokia’s other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 643 million in the second quarter 2016, compared to an expense of EUR 40 million in the first quarter 2016. The increase was primarily related to non-IFRS exclusions attributable to recognition of restructuring and associated charges related to the overall cost savings program. In Q2 2016, other income and expenses were adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, as certain provisions were recorded due to the risk of asset impairment.

Descriptions of non-IFRS exclusions in Q2 2016

Non-IFRS exclusions consist of costs related to the Alcatel-Lucent transaction and related integration, goodwill impairment charges, intangible asset amortization and purchase price related items, restructuring and associated charges, and certain other items that may not be indicative of Nokia’s underlying business performance. For additional details, please refer to note 2, “Non-IFRS to reported reconciliation”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

(1)Nokia standalone historicals are the recasting of Nokia’s historical standalone financial results, reflecting Nokia’s updated segment reporting structure, excluding Alcatel-Lucent. Beginning from the first quarter 2016, Nokia results include those of Alcatel-Lucent on a consolidated basis. Accordingly, Nokia results beginning from the first quarter 2016 are not directly comparable to prior period Nokia standalone results.

8

Net sales

In the second quarter 2016, non-IFRS exclusions in net sales amounted to EUR 93 million, and related to purchase price allocation adjustment related to the reduced valuation of deferred revenue that existed on Alcatel-Lucent’s balance sheet at the time of the acquisition.

Operating profit

In the second quarter 2016, non-IFRS exclusions in operating profit amounted to EUR 1 092 million, and were attributable to non-IFRS exclusions that negatively affected gross profit, R&D, SG&A and other income and expenses as follows:

In the second quarter 2016, non-IFRS exclusions in gross profit amounted to EUR 174 million, and primarily related to the deferred revenue and, to a lesser extent, product portfolio integration related costs resulting from the acquisition of Alcatel-Lucent.

In the second quarter 2016, non-IFRS exclusions in R&D expenses amounted to EUR 162 million, and primarily related to the amortization of intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of Alcatel-Lucent.

In the second quarter 2016, non-IFRS exclusions in SG&A expenses amounted to EUR 154 million, and primarily related to the amortization of intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of Alcatel-Lucent, as well as transaction and integration related costs.

In the second quarter 2016, non-IFRS exclusions in other income and expenses amounted to EUR 602 million, and primarily related to EUR 596 million of restructuring and associated charges for Nokia’s cost reduction and efficiency improvement initiatives.

Cost savings program

The following table summarizes the financial information related to our cost savings program, as of the end of the second quarter 2016. Balances related to previous Nokia and Alcatel-Lucent restructuring and cost savings programs have been included as part of this overall cost savings program.

The Q2 2016 opening balance of restructuring and associated liabilities of approximately EUR 450 million relates to previous Nokia and Alcatel-Lucent restructuring and cost-savings programs, and represents expected cash outflows which have been provisioned for but not yet paid out related to these programs. The approximately EUR 450 million of restructuring and associated liabilities consists of approximately EUR 380 million of restructuring provisions and approximately EUR 70 million of other related liabilities.

9

Outlook

10

11

Nokia’s Networks business

Operational highlights

12

Financial highlights

The following table presents Combined company historicals for Nokia which reflect Nokia’s new operating and financial reporting structure, including Alcatel-Lucent, and are presented as additional information as described in the stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. The figures presented are as reported to the management by the segments. The non-IFRS exclusions are not allocated to the segments, and hence they are reported only at the Nokia consolidated level. For more information on the combined company historicals and segment accounting policies, please refer to note 1, “Basis of preparation” and note 3, “Segment information and eliminations”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

(1) Combined company historicals reflect Nokia’s new operating and financial reporting structure, including Alcatel-Lucent, and are presented as additional information as described in the stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. For more information on the combined company historicals, please refer to note 1, “Basis of Preparation”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

13

Net sales by region

(1)Combined company historicals reflect Nokia’s new operating and financial reporting structure, including Alcatel-Lucent, and are presented as additional information as described in the stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. For more information on the combined company historicals, please refer to note 1, “Basis of Preparation”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

Financial discussion

Net sales by segment

Nokia’s Networks business net sales decreased 11% year-on-year and increased 1% sequentially. On a constant currency basis, Nokia’s Networks business net sales would have decreased 9% year-on-year and would have increased 2% sequentially.

A discussion of our results within Ultra Broadband Networks and IP Networks and Applications is included in the sections “Ultra Broadband Networks” and “IP Networks and Applications” below.

Year-on-year discussion

The year-on-year decrease in Nokia’s Networks business net sales in the second quarter 2016 was due to both Ultra Broadband Networks and IP Networks and Applications.

Sequential discussion

The sequential increase in Nokia’s Networks business net sales in the second quarter 2016 was due to Ultra Broadband Networks, partially offset by IP Networks and Applications.

14

Operating profit

Year-on-year discussion

On a year-on-year basis, in the second quarter 2016, Nokia’s Networks business operating profit decreased primarily due to lower gross profit, partially offset by lower R&D and SG&A expenses.

The decrease in gross profit was due to both Ultra Broadband Networks and IP Networks and Applications. In Q2 2016, gross profit was adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, as revenue was deferred while the related costs of sale were expensed as incurred.

The decrease in R&D expenses was primarily due to Ultra Broadband Networks.

The decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily due to Ultra Broadband Networks.

Nokia’s Networks business other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 31 million in the second quarter 2016, compared to an expense of EUR 36 million in the year-ago quarter. On a year-on-year basis, the net positive fluctuation in other income and expenses in Ultra Broadband Networks was partially offset by a net negative fluctuation in other income and expenses in IP Networks and Applications. In Q2 2016, other income and expenses were adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, as certain provisions were recorded due to the risk of asset impairment.

Sequential discussion

On a sequential basis, in the second quarter 2016, Nokia’s Networks business operating profit decreased primarily due to lower gross profit and a net negative fluctuation in other income and expenses, partially offset by lower R&D expenses.

The decrease in gross profit was due to IP Networks and Applications, partially offset by Ultra Broadband Networks. In Q2 2016, gross profit was adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, as revenue was deferred while the related costs of sale were expensed as incurred.

The decrease in R&D expenses was primarily due to IP Networks and Applications.

Nokia’s Networks business other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 31 million in the second quarter 2016, compared to an expense of EUR 19 million in the first quarter 2016. On a sequential basis, the change was primarily due to Ultra Broadband Networks. In Q2 2016, other income and expenses were adversely affected by a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, as certain provisions were recorded due to the risk of asset impairment.

15

Ultra Broadband Networks

Financial highlights

The following table presents Combined company historicals for Nokia which reflect Nokia’s new operating and financial reporting structure, including Alcatel-Lucent, and are presented as additional information as described in the stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. The figures presented are as reported to the management by the segments. The non-IFRS exclusions are not allocated to the segments, and hence they are reported only at the Nokia consolidated level. For more information on the combined company historicals and segment accounting policies, please refer to note 1, “Basis of preparation” and note 3, “Segment information and eliminations”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

(1) Combined company historicals reflect Nokia’s new operating and financial reporting structure, including Alcatel-Lucent, and are presented as additional information as described in the stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. For more information on the combined company historicals, please refer to note 1, “Basis of Preparation”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

16

Net sales by region

(1)Combined company historicals reflect Nokia’s new operating and financial reporting structure, including Alcatel-Lucent, and are presented as additional information as described in the stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. For more information on the combined company historicals, please refer to note 1, “Basis of Preparation”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

Financial discussion

Net sales

Ultra Broadband Networks net sales decreased 12% year-on-year and increased 2% sequentially. On a constant currency basis, Ultra Broadband net sales would have decreased 9% year-on-year and increased 3% sequentially.

Year-on-year discussion

The year-on-year decrease in Ultra Broadband Networks net sales in the second quarter 2016 was due to Mobile Networks, partially offset by Fixed Networks.

The decrease in Mobile Networks net sales was primarily due to radio networks and services. For radio networks, the decrease was primarily related to certain customers in Asia-Pacific. For services, the decrease was primarily related to certain customers in North America, Latin America and Asia-Pacific.

The increase in Fixed Networks net sales was primarily due to broadband access and digital home, partially offset by a decrease in services. In the second quarter 2016, Fixed Networks benefitted from large projects with certain customers in Australia and Mexico, as well as continued momentum in digital home in North America. For services, the decrease was primarily related to certain customers in Europe and North America.

Sequential discussion

The sequential increase in Ultra Broadband Networks net sales in the second quarter 2016 was primarily due to Mobile Networks, partially offset by the negative impact related to a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery.

The increase in Mobile Networks net sales was primarily due to radio networks. For radio networks, the increase was primarily related to certain customers in Greater China and North America, partially offset by certain customers in Asia-Pacific.

The slight increase in Fixed Networks net sales was primarily due to digital home, partially offset by broadband access. In the second quarter 2016, Fixed Networks benefitted from large projects with certain customers in Australia and Mexico.

17

Operating profit

Year-on-year discussion

On a year-on-year basis, in the second quarter 2016, Ultra Broadband Networks operating profit decreased primarily due to lower gross profit, partially offset by lower R&D expenses and SG&A expenses and, to a lesser extent, a net positive fluctuation in other income and expenses.

The decrease in Ultra Broadband Networks gross profit was primarily due to lower gross profit in Mobile Networks, partially offset by higher gross profit in Fixed Networks. The decrease in gross profit in Mobile Networks was primarily due to lower net sales. The increase in gross profit in Fixed Networks was due to higher net sales and higher gross margin.

The decrease in Ultra Broadband Networks R&D expenses was primarily due to Mobile Networks. The decrease in Mobile Networks R&D expenses was primarily due to continued operational improvement, with lower personnel and subcontracting expenses.

The decrease in Ultra Broadband Networks SG&A expenses was primarily due to Mobile Networks, which benefitted from cost discipline and continued operational improvement, with lower marketing and consulting expenses.

Ultra Broadband Networks other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 19 million in the second quarter 2016, compared to an expense of EUR 29 million in the year-ago quarter. On a year-on-year basis, the change was primarily due to Fixed Networks.

Sequential discussion

On a sequential basis, in the second quarter 2016, Ultra Broadband Networks operating profit decreased slightly, primarily due to higher SG&A expenses and a net negative fluctuation in other income and expenses, partially offset by higher gross profit. Excluding the negative impact related to a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, operating profit in Ultra Broadband Networks would have increased.

The increase in Ultra Broadband Networks gross profit was primarily due to Mobile Networks. The increase in Mobile Networks gross profit was primarily due to higher net sales.

The increase in Ultra Broadband Networks SG&A expenses was primarily due to Mobile Networks. The increase in Mobile Networks SG&A expenses was primarily due to higher personnel and consulting expenses.

Ultra Broadband Networks other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 19 million in the second quarter 2016, compared to an expense of EUR 9 million in the first quarter 2016. On a sequential basis, the change was primarily due to Mobile Networks.

18

IP Networks and Applications

Financial highlights

The following table presents Combined company historicals for Nokia which reflect Nokia’s new operating and financial reporting structure, including Alcatel-Lucent, and are presented as additional information as described in the stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. The figures presented are as reported to the management by the segments. The non-IFRS exclusions are not allocated to the segments, and hence they are reported only at the Nokia consolidated level. For more information on the combined company historicals and segment accounting policies, please refer to note 1, “Basis of preparation” and note 3, “Segment information and eliminations”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

(1) Combined company historicals reflect Nokia’s new operating and financial reporting structure, including Alcatel-Lucent, and are presented as additional information as described in the stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. For more information on the combined company historicals, please refer to note 1, “Basis of Preparation”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

19

Net sales by region

(1)Combined company historicals reflect Nokia’s new operating and financial reporting structure, including Alcatel-Lucent, and are presented as additional information as described in the stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. For more information on the combined company historicals, please refer to note 1, “Basis of Preparation”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

Financial discussion

Net sales

IP Networks and Applications net sales decreased 11% year-on-year and 2% sequentially. On a constant currency basis, IP Networks and Applications net sales would have decreased 8% year-on-year and 1% sequentially.

Year-on-year discussion

The year-on-year decrease in IP Networks and Applications net sales in the second quarter 2016 was due to both IP/Optical Networks and Applications & Analytics.

The decrease in IP/Optical Networks net sales was due to both IP routing and optical networks. Slightly less than half of the overall year-on-year net sales decrease in IP routing was attributable to lower resale of third party IP routers, particularly in Europe. In addition, IP routing decreased in North America due to lower spending by Tier 1 customers, partially offset by higher spending by Tier 1 customers in Greater China and Asia-Pacific. In the second quarter of 2016, optical networks was adversely affected by the timing of projects primarily in Middle East & Africa.

The decrease in Applications & Analytics net sales was due to declines across all business lines, and was affected by the timing of large projects in North America.

Sequential discussion

The sequential decrease in IP Networks and Applications net sales in the second quarter 2016 was primarily due to Applications & Analytics and, to a lesser extent, the negative impact related to a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery.

The slight decrease in IP/Optical Networks net sales was due to both IP routing and optical networks. Excluding only the negative impact from lower resale of third party IP routers, net sales in IP routing would have grown slightly on a sequential

20

basis. Excluding only the negative impact related to a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, net sales in IP/Optical Networks would have been approximately flat.

The decrease in Applications & Analytics net sales was primarily due to declines across all business lines, with the exception of services, and was affected by the timing of large projects in North America.

Operating profit

Year-on-year discussion

On a year-on-year basis, in the second quarter 2016, IP Networks and Applications operating profit decreased primarily due to lower gross profit.

The decrease in IP Networks and Applications gross profit was primarily due to Applications & Analytics and, to a lesser extent, IP/Optical Networks. The decrease in gross profit in Applications & Analytics was due to lower net sales and lower gross margin, both of which were primarily related to lower volumes in North America. The decrease in gross profit in IP/Optical Networks was primarily due to lower net sales.

Sequential discussion

On a sequential basis, in the second quarter 2016, IP Networks and Applications operating profit decreased primarily due to lower gross profit, partially offset by lower R&D expenses. Excluding the negative impact related to a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, operating profit in IP Networks and Applications would have been approximately flat.

The decrease in IP Networks and Applications gross profit was primarily due to Applications & Analytics and, to a lesser extent, IP/Optical Networks. The decrease in gross profit in Applications & Analytics was due to lower gross margin and lower net sales, primarily related to lower volumes in North America. The decrease in gross profit in IP/Optical Networks was due to lower gross margin and lower net sales. Excluding the negative impact related to a customer in Latin America undergoing judicial recovery, gross profit in IP/Optical Networks would have been approximately flat.

The decrease in IP Networks and Applications R&D expenses was due to IP/Optical Networks and, to a lesser extent, Applications & Analytics. The decrease in IP/Optical Networks R&D expenses was due to both IP routing and optical networks.

21

Nokia Technologies

Operational highlights

Financial highlights

The following table presents Combined company historicals for Nokia which reflect Nokia’s new operating and financial reporting structure, including Alcatel-Lucent, and are presented as additional information as described in the stock exchange release published on April 22, 2016. The figures presented are as reported to the management by the segments. The non-IFRS exclusions are not allocated to the segments, and hence they are reported only at the Nokia consolidated level. For more information on the combined company historicals and segment accounting policies, please refer to note 1, “Basis of preparation” and note 3, “Segment information and eliminations”, in the notes to the financial statements attached to this report.

22