First Citizens 10k 2006

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549
________________________

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X]       ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE 
             ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 200
6

[  ]        Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission file number 0-11709
________________________

First Citizens Bancshares, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Tennessee

62-1180360

(State or other jurisdiction of

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

incorporation or organization)

 

P.O. Box 370, First Citizens Place
Dyersburg, Tennessee 38025-0370
(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)

(731) 285-4410
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
________________________

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of each exchange
Title of each class on which registered
None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock
(Title of class)

________________________

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ]   No [ x ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes [ ]  No [x]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x]   No [  ].

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 Regulation S-K (Section 229.40) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes [x]    No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check One): 
                                       Large accelerated filer [ ]     Accelerated filer [x]    Non-accelerated filer [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes [ ]  No [x]

________________________

The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at June 30, 2006 was $81,031,358.

Of the registrant's only class of common stock (no par value) there were 3,632,093 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2006.

________________________


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Portions of the Proxy Statement dated March 15, 2007 (Part III)

 

PART I

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Information contained herein includes forward-looking statements with respect to Bancshares' beliefs, plans, risks, goals and estimates.  Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant banking, economic, and competitive uncertainties, many of which are beyond management's control.  When used in this discussion, the words "anticipate," "project," "expect," "believe," "should," "intend," "is likely," "going forward" and other expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking statements are within the meaning of section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Such statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of income or loss, expenses, acquisitions, plans for the future, and others.

Forward-looking statements are based upon information currently available and represent management's expectations or predictions of the future.  Due to risks and uncertainties involved, actual results could differ materially from such forward-looking statements.  Examples of such risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to:

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

PRESENTATION OF AMOUNTS

All dollar amounts set forth below, other than per-share amounts, are in thousands unless otherwise noted.

GENERAL

First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. (Bancshares or the Company) is a Tennessee Corporation organized and incorporated in 1982 and commenced operations in September 1983.  Bancshares is registered as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended and elected, effective April 19, 2000 to become a financial holding company pursuant to the provisions of the Gramm-Leach Bliley Act.   As a financial holding company, Bancshares may engage in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to a financial activity.  Permissible activities for a financial holding company are contained in Regulation Y of Federal Reserve regulations.  Bancshares may continue to claim the benefits of financial holding company status so long as each depository institution owned by the company remains well capitalized and well managed.  In addition, Bancshares may not commence new activities under sections 4(k) or 4(n) of the Bank Holding Company Act or acquire control of a company engaged in activities under those sections if any of The Company's insured depository institutions receive a rating of less than satisfactory under any examination conducted to determine compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. Bancshares is a one-bank holding company. At December 31, 2006, the Corporation had total assets of $831 million compared to $816 million at December 31, 2005. 

The Principal Executive Offices are at One First Citizens Place, Dyersburg, Tennessee 38024.   Our telephone number is 731-285-4410.  Our website is www.firstcitizens-bank.com.  In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and other related laws, Bancshares files reports with the United States Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) including annual and quarterly reports (Forms 10-K and 10-Q) as well as current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, if any.  As of the end of the second fiscal quarter of 2005, the market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates exceeded $75 million and thus, Bancshares began filing required periodic reports with the SEC under accelerated status beginning with the filing of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

The public may read and copy any materials the Company files with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20549.  The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.  The SEC also maintains an Internet site at www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information.  We post our website links to our annual, quarterly and current reports as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with the SEC.  Such reports can be downloaded and/or viewed free of charge through access to the links on our website.  Shareholders may request a copy of the quarterly or annual reports without charge by contacting Judy Long, Secretary, First Citizens Bancshares, Inc., P. O. Box 370 Dyersburg, Tennessee 38025-0370. 

Shareholders desiring to communicate directly with the Board of Directors of the Corporation may do so through the Corporate Governance Committee by contacting the Chairman or any member of the committee.  Committee membership is identified on First Citizens website at www.firstcitizens-bank.com or may be obtained by calling the Audit Department of First Citizens at 731-287-4275.  Letters sent via the US Postal Service may be mailed to Chairman, Corporate Governance Committee, First Citizens National Bank, Audit Department, P.O. Box 890, Dyersburg, TN  38025-0890.

-1-


Bancshares, through its principal banking subsidiary, First Citizens National Bank, provides a broad range of financial services. The Company is engaged in both retail and commercial banking business.  First Citizens National Bank was chartered as a national bank in 1900 and operates in West Tennessee.  First Citizens operates under the supervision of the Comptroller of the Currency, and is a member of the Federal Reserve System.  Deposits at First Citizens National Bank are insured up to applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).  The subsidiary bank is also subject to various requirements and restrictions under federal and state law, including requirements to maintain reserves against deposits, restrictions on the types and amounts of loans that may be granted and interest that may be charged thereon and limitations on the types of investments that may be made, activities that may be engaged in, and types of services that may be offered.  Various consumer laws and regulations also affect operations of the subsidiary bank.  In addition to the impact of regulation, commercial banks are affected significantly by the actions of the Federal Reserve as it attempts to control the money supply and credit availability in order to influence the economy.  The subsidiary bank operates under the day-to-day management of its officers and directors; and formulates its own policies with respect to lending practices, interest rates and service charges and other banking matters.

Bancshares' primary source of income is dividends received from First Citizens National Bank.  Dividend payments are determined in relation to earnings, deposit growth and capital position of the subsidiaries in compliance with regulatory guidelines. Management anticipates that future increases in the capital of Bancshares will be accomplished through earnings retention or capital injection.

The following table sets forth a comparative analysis of Assets, Deposits, Net Loans, and Equity Capital of Bancshares as of December 31, for the years indicated:

 

December 31

 

 

(In Thousands)

 

2006    

2005

2004

Total Assets

 $

831,420 

 $

815,749 

 $

773,204 

Total Deposits

666,063 

635,509 

592,382 

Total Net Loans

542,623 

540,387 

528,443 

Total Equity Capital

69,498 

63,646 

61,208 

Individual bank performance is compared to industry standards through utilization of the Federal Reserve Board's Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation.  First Citizens Bancshares is grouped with peers with assets totaling $500 million to $1 billion.  The group consisted of 414 bank holding companies per the September 30, 2006 Bank Holding Company Performance Report, which is the most recent report available as of the date of this report.

The following presents comparisons of Bancshares with its peers as indicated on Bank Holding Company Performance Reports for the periods indicated:

12/31/2006**

12/31/2005

12/31/2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

BANCSHARES

PEER GRP

BANCSHARES

PEER GRP

BANCSHARES

PEER GRP

Net Interest Income/Average Assets

3.60 %

3.77 %

3.53 %

3.79 %

3.44 %

3.73 %

Net Operating Income/Average Assets

1.10 %

1.07 %

1.10 %

1.11 %

1.08 %

1.06 %

Net Loan Losses/ Average Total Loans

0.23 %

0.08 %

0.09 %

0.10 %

0.00 %

0.17 %

Primary Capital/Average Assets

8.11 %

9.35 %

7.88 %

9.18 %

7.05 %

9.10 %

Cash Dividends/Net Income

46.04 %

25.76 %

47.03 %

23.22 %

50.83 %

26.35 %

**Peer information for December 31, 2006 is compared to the September 30, 2006 Bank Holding Company Performance Report (most recent report available).

EXPANSION

Bancshares through its strategic planning process has stated its intention to seek profitable opportunities that would utilize excess capital and maximize income in Tennessee.  Bancshares' objective in acquiring other banking institutions would be for asset growth and diversification into other market areas.  Acquisitions and de-novo branches afford Bancshares increased economies of scale within the operation functions and better utilization of human resources.  Any acquisition or de-novo branching approved by Bancshares would be deemed to be in the best interest of Bancshares and its shareholders. 

Bancshares acquired Munford Union Bank in May 2002.  This acquisition originally added $115 million in assets housed in Tipton and Shelby Counties in Tennessee to Bancshares' balance sheet.  Since this acquisition, the Bank has opened three additional branches in this area which are Arlington in Shelby County that opened in 2003, Oakland in Fayette County which opened in June 2004 and Collierville in Shelby County which opened in April 2005.  The assets of the Southwest Region (branches in Shelby, Tipton, and Fayette Counties) were approximately $232 million as of December 31, 2006. 

In first quarter 2007, Bancshares' expansion will continue with the opening of loan production offices in Jackson, Tennessee and Franklin, Tennessee.

-2-


CAPITAL ADEQUACY

Bancshares is subject to capital adequacy requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve.   The Federal Reserve has adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies.  The minimum guideline for the ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets (including certain off-balance-sheet items such as standby letters of credit) is 8%, and the minimum ratio of Tier 1 Capital to risk-weighted assets is 4%.  At least half of the Total Capital must be composed of common stock, minority interests in the equity capital accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and a limited amount of cumulative perpetual preferred stock, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets (Tier 1 Capital).  The remainder may consist of qualifying subordinated debt, certain types of mandatory convertible securities and perpetual debt, other preferred stock and a limited amount of loan loss reserves.  At December 31, 2006, Bancshares' total risked-based capital ratio was 12.49% significantly in excess of 8% mandated by regulation.  The risk based capital ratio was 12.11% for 2005 and 10.86% for 2004.  Our strategic plan directs the company to leverage capital by growing assets.  Risk based capital focuses primarily on broad categories of credit risk and incorporates elements of transfer, interest rate and market risks.  The calculation of risk-based capital ratio is accomplished by dividing qualifying capital by weighted risk assets.  Tier 1 leverage ratio at year-end 2006 was 8.22%, with total capital as a percentage of total assets at 8.36%.

Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject a financial holding company to a variety of enforcement remedies, including the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, and to certain restrictions on its business and in certain circumstances to the appointment of a conservator or receiver.

BANKING BUSINESS

The Company, headquartered in Dyersburg, Tennessee, is the bank holding company for First Citizens National Bank ("Bank"), and First Citizens (TN) Statutory Trusts II and III.  First Citizens Capital Assets, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Bancshares was liquidated in December 2006 with no material impact to the consolidated financial statements.  First Citizens National Bank is a diversified financial service institution, which provides banking and other financial services to its customers. The bank operates two wholly owned subsidiaries: First Citizens Financial Plus, Inc. and First Citizens Investments, Inc.  First Citizens Investments, Inc. has a wholly owned subsidiary, First Citizens Holdings, Inc.   First Citizens Properties, Inc., is a 98% owned subsidiary of First Citizens Holdings, Inc.  The formation of these entities had no material impact on the consolidated financial statements of First Citizens Bancshares, Inc.  The bank also owns 50% of White and Associates/First Citizens Insurance, LLC which provides various insurance products to its customers and First Citizens/White and Associates Insurance Company, Inc., which is a provider of credit insurance. The activities of the Bank's subsidiaries consist of: brokerage, investments, insurance related products, credit insurance and real estate participation interests.

First Citizens provides customary banking services, such as checking and savings accounts, funds transfers, various types of time deposits and safe deposit facilities.  Other services also include the financing of commercial transactions and making and servicing both secured and unsecured loans to individuals, firms and corporations. First Citizens is a leader in agricultural lending in Tennessee.  Agricultural services include operating loans as well as financing for the purchase of equipment and farmland.  The consumer-lending department makes direct loans to individuals for personal, automobile, real estate, home improvement, business and collateral needs.

Mortgage lending makes available long term fixed and variable rate loans to finance the purchase of residential real estate.  These loans are sold in the secondary market without retaining servicing rights.  Commercial lending operations include various types of credit services for customers.

The subsidiary bank has a total of 32 banking locations (15 full service branch banks, four drive-thru only branches and 13 free standing ATMs) in seven Tennessee counties.  Subsidiaries of the Bank consist of the following:

COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT

The business of providing financial services is highly competitive. Competition involves not only other banks but non-financial enterprises as well. In addition to competing with other commercial banks in the service area, the Bank competes with savings and loan associations, insurance companies, savings banks, small loan companies, finance companies, mortgage companies, real estate investment trusts, certain governmental agencies, credit card organizations, credit unions and other enterprises.  In 1998 federal legislation allowed credit unions to expand their membership criterion.  Expanded membership criterion coupled with an existing tax free status provided a competitive advantage when compared with that of banks.   

First Citizens builds and implements strategic plans and commitments to address competitive factors in the various markets it serves.  The primary strategic focus is on obtaining and maintaining profitable customer relationships in all markets.  The markets demand competitive pricing, but First Citizens competes on high quality customer service that will attract and enhance loyal, profitable customers to our bank.  Industry surveys have consistently revealed that 65-70 percent of customers leave due to customer service issues.  First Citizens is committed to excellent customer service in all markets served as a means of branding and distinguishing itself from other financial institutions.  Advertising and promotional activities such as newspaper and radio ads are also utilized in accordance with defined strategic plans.  For example, advertising and promotions were increased in 2004 and 2005 in the Southwest Region after the announcement of two mergers of large regional banks in efforts to attract new deposits and promote brand awareness. 

-3-


In the markets it serves, First Citizens offers a typical mix of interest-bearing transaction, savings and time deposit products as well as traditional non-interest bearing deposit accounts.  First Citizens is the leader in deposit market share compared to competitors in the Dyer, Fayette, Lauderdale, Obion, Tipton and Weakley County, Tennessee markets.  Source of the following information is the Deposit Market Share Report as of June 30, 2006 prepared annually by the FDIC.  The following tabular analysis presents the number of offices, deposits (in thousands), and market share percentage for deposits:

Dyer, Fayette, Lauderdale, Obion, Tipton, and Weakley County Markets

(Banks only, Deposits Inside of Market)

As of June 30, 2006

 

# of

Total

% of Market

Bank Name

Offices

Deposits

Share

(in thousands) 

First Citizens National Bank

15

 $

545,463 

20.16 %

First State Bank

14

511,167 

18.89 %

Regions Bank

13

251,438 

9.29 %

BancorpSouth Bank

6

171,125 

6.33 %

Somerville Bank & Trust Co.

5

159,976 

5.91 %

Bank of Fayette County

5

124,659 

4.61 %

Bank of Ripley

5

119,403 

4.41 %

Commercial Bank & Trust

2

117,756 

4.35 %

Reelfoot Bank

5

87,074 

3.22 %

INSOUTH Bank

2

86,963 

3.21 %

Security Bank

6

84,559 

3.13 %

First South Bank

2

68,305 

2.52 %

Oakland Deposit Bank

3

65,241 

2.41 %

Bank of Gleason

1

53,963 

1.99 %

All others

14

258,395 

9.55 %

Total

98

 $

2,705,487 

100.00 %

First Citizens has consistently been the leader in market share of deposits in its markets for several years.  First Citizens' market share has been about 20% in these six counties combined and in excess of 62 percent in Dyer County for the last three years. 

First Citizens National Bank also competes in the Shelby County Market.  As the size and composition of the Shelby County Market is much larger and more diverse, Shelby County is excluded from the tabular presentation above.  Market share in Shelby County has increased from 0.41% to 0.47% from 2005 to 2006.

EMPLOYEES

Bancshares and its subsidiary employed a total of 266 full-time equivalent employees (FTE) during each of the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006.  First Citizens is committed to hiring and retaining high quality employees to execute strategic plans of the Company.  Relationship with employees is satisfactory and no collective bargaining issues exist.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

Bancshares is a one-bank financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and is subject to supervision and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. As a financial holding company, Bancshares is required to file with the Federal Reserve annual reports and other information regarding its business obligations and those of its subsidiaries.  Federal Reserve approval must be obtained before Bancshares may:

1)     Acquire ownership or control of any voting securities of a bank or bank holding company where the acquisition results in the bank holding company owning or controlling more than 5 percent of a class of voting securities of that bank or bank holding company;

2)    Acquire substantially all assets of a bank or bank holding company or merge with another bank holding company.

Federal Reserve approval is not required for a bank subsidiary of a bank holding company to merge with or acquire substantially all assets of another bank if prior approval of a federal supervisory agency, such as the Comptroller of the Currency is required under the Bank Merger Act.  Relocation of a subsidiary bank of a bank holding company from one state to another requires prior approval of the Federal Reserve and is subject to the prohibitions of the Douglas Amendment.

The Bank Holding Company Act provides that the Federal Reserve shall not approve any acquisition, merger or consolidation which would result in a monopoly or which would be in furtherance of any combination or conspiracy to monopolize or attempt to monopolize the business of banking in any part of the United States.  Further, the Federal Reserve may not approve any other proposed acquisition, merger, or consolidation, the effect of which might be to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any section of the country, or which in any manner would be in restraint of trade, unless the anti-competitive effect of the proposed transaction is clearly outweighed in favor of public interest by the probable effect of the transaction in meeting convenience and needs of the community to be served. An amendment effective February 4, 1993 further provides that an application may be denied if the applicant has failed to provide the Federal Reserve with adequate assurances that it will make available such information on its operations and activities, and the operations and activities of any affiliate, deemed appropriate to determine and enforce compliance with the Bank Holding Company Act and any other applicable federal banking statutes and regulations.  In addition, consideration is given to the competence, experience and integrity of the officers, directors and principal shareholders of the applicant and any subsidiaries as well as the banks and bank holding companies concerned.  The Federal Reserve also considers the record of the applicant and its affiliates in fulfilling commitments to conditions imposed by the Federal Reserve in connection with prior applications.

A bank holding company is prohibited with limited exceptions from engaging directly or indirectly through its subsidiaries in activities unrelated to banking or managing or controlling banks. One exception to this limitation permits ownership of a company engaged solely in furnishing services to banks; another permits ownership of shares of the company, all of the activities of which the Federal Reserve has determined after due notice and opportunity for hearing, to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks, as to be a proper incident thereto. Moreover, under the 1970 amendments to the Act and to the Federal Reserve regulations, a financial holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain "tie-in" arrangements in connection with any extension of credit or provision of any property or service. Subsidiary banks of a financial holding company are subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on any extension of credit to the financial holding company or to any of its other subsidiaries, or investments in the stock or other securities thereof, and on the taking of such stock for securities as collateral for loans to any borrower.

Financial holding companies are required to file an annual report of their operations with the Federal Reserve, and they and their subsidiaries are subject to examination by the Federal Reserve.

-4-


USURY, RECENT LEGISLATION AND ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

Tennessee usury laws limit the rate of interest that may be charged by banks. Certain Federal laws provide for preemption of state usury laws.

Legislation enacted in 1983 amends Tennessee usury laws to permit interest at an annual rate of four (4) percentage points above the average prime loan rate for the most recent week for which such an average rate has been published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, or twenty-four percent (24%), whichever is less (TCA 47-14-102(3)). The "Most Favored Lender Doctrine" permits national banks to charge the highest rate permitted by any state lender.

Specific usury laws may apply to certain categories of loans, such as the limitation placed on interest rates on single pay loans of $1,000.00 or less for one year or less.  Rates charged on installment loans, including credit cards, as well as other types of loans may be governed by the Industrial Loan and Thrift Companies Act.

IMPACT OF GRAMM LEACH-BLILEY ACT

The Gramm Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999 permits bank holding companies meeting certain management, capital, and community reinvestment act standards to engage in a substantially broader range of non-banking activities than permitted previously, including insurance underwriting and merchant banking activities.  The Act repeals sections 20 and 32 of the Glass Steagall Act, permitting affiliations of banks with securities firms and registered investment companies.  The Act authorizes financial holding companies, permitting banks to be owned by security firms, insurance companies and merchant banking companies and visa-versa. Some of these affiliations are also permissible for bank subsidiaries.  The Act gives the Federal Reserve Board authority to regulate financial holding companies, but provides for functional regulation of subsidiary activities.

The Gramm Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act also modifies financial privacy and community reinvestment laws. The new financial privacy provisions generally prohibit financial institutions such as the Bank from disclosing non-public personal financial information to third parties unless customers have the opportunity to opt out of the disclosure.  The Act also magnifies the consequences of a bank receiving less than a satisfactory community reinvestment act rating, by freezing new activities until the institution achieves a better community reinvestment act rating.

BANK SECRECY ACT

Over the past thirty plus years, Congress has passed several laws impacting a financial institution's responsibilities relating to Bank Secrecy Act.  The most recent change was in 2001 with the enactment of the USA Patriot Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism ACT).  This act significantly amended and expanded the application of the Bank Secrecy Act, including enhanced measures regarding customer identity, new suspicious activity reporting rules and enhanced anti-money laundering programs.   In 2005, there was no new legislation enacted relating to Bank Secrecy Act.  However, on June 30, 2005, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) and the Federal bank examination agencies released the new interagency "Bank Secrecy Act Anti-Money Laundering Examination Manual".  The manual emphasizes a banking organization's responsibility to establish and implement risk-based policies, procedures, and processes to comply with the Bank Secrecy Act and safeguard its operations from money laundering and terrorist financing.   It is a compilation of existing regulatory requirements, supervisory expectations, and sound practices for Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) compliance.  An effective BSA/AML compliance program requires sound risk management; therefore, the manual also provides guidance on identifying and controlling risk associated with money laundering and terrorist financing.  The development of this manual was a collaborative effort of the federal banking agencies and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau of the U. S. Department of the Treasury, to ensure consistency in the application of the BSA/AML requirements and consistent examinations of banking organizations. 

The specific examination procedures performed will depend on the BSA/AML risk profile of the banking organization, the quality and quantity of independent testing, the financial institutions history of BSA/AML compliance and other relevant factors.   First Citizens has implemented effective risk-based policies and procedures that reinforce existing practices and encourages a vigilant determination to prevent the institution from becoming associated with criminals or being used as a channel for money laundering or terrorist financing activities.

USA PATRIOT ACT OF 2001

On October 26, 2001, President Bush signed into law the USA Patriot Act of 2001.  The law enhances the powers of the federal government and law enforcement organizations to combat terrorism, organized crime and money laundering.   The Patriot Act significantly amends and expands the application of the Bank Secrecy Act, including enhanced measures regarding customer identity, new suspicious activity reporting rules and enhanced anti-money laundering programs.  Under the Act, each financial institution is required to establish and maintain anti-money laundering programs, which include, at a minimum, the development of internal policies, procedures, and controls; the designation of a compliance officer; an ongoing employee training program; and an independent audit function to test programs.  In addition, the Act requires the bank regulatory agencies to consider the record of a bank or banking holding company in combating money laundering activities in their evaluation of bank and bank holding company merger or acquisition transactions.  Regulations proposed by the U.S. Department of Treasury to effectuate certain provisions of the Patriot Act provide that all transaction or other correspondent accounts held by a U.S. financial institution on behalf of any foreign bank must be closed within ninety days after the final regulations are issued, unless the foreign bank has provided the U.S. financial institution with a means of verification that the institution is not a shell bank. First Citizens National Bank implemented policies and procedures in compliance with stated regulations of the Patriot Act. 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE REFORM ACT OF 2005

After six years, the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (FDIRA) was passed on February 8, 2006, as part of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005.  The primary components of FDIRA are as follows:  merges the two major funds into a new Deposit Insurance Fund, raises coverage on retirement accounts to $250,000, establishes indexing insurance levels for inflation, caps the fund, sets up a system of dividends, gives banks credit for past payments to the fund and provides for flexibility if the fund should ever face financial difficulty.  The FDIC is required to implement most of the provisions of FDIRA by November 5, 2006. 

-5-


CUSTOMER INFORMATION SECURITY AND CUSTOMER FINANCIAL PRIVACY

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System published guidelines for Customer Information Security and Customer Financial Privacy with a mandatory effective date of July 1, 2001.  First Citizens has established policies in adherence to the published guidelines. 

The three principal requirements relating to the Privacy of Consumer Financial Information in the Gramm Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) are as follows:

The Customer Information Security guidelines implement section 501(b) of GLBA.  The act requires the agencies to establish standards for financial institutions relating to administrative, technical and physical safeguards for customer records and information.

The guidelines require financial institutions to establish an information security program to:

Each institution may implement a security program appropriate to its size, complexity, nature and scope of its operations.  First Citizens National Bank has structured and implemented a financial security program that complies with all principal requirements of the act.

The regulatory agencies also published the Interagency Guidance on Response Programs for Unauthorized Access to Customer Information and Customer Notice.  Each financial institution is required to implement a response program to address unauthorized access to sensitive customer information maintained by the institution or its service providers.  First Citizens has implemented an appropriate response program, which includes: formation of an "Incident Response Team"; properly assessing and investigating any incident; notifying the OCC of any security breach, if necessary; taking appropriate steps to contain and control any incident; and notifying affected customers when required. 

Monetary policies of regulatory authorities, including the Federal Reserve have a significant effect on operating results of bank holding companies and their subsidiary banks.  The Federal Reserve regulates the national supply of bank credit by open market operations in United States Government securities, changes in the discount rate on bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. A tool once extensively used by the Federal Reserve to control growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits has been eliminated through deregulation.  Competition, not regulation, dictates rates, which must be paid and/or charged in order to attract and retain customers.

Federal Reserve monetary policies have materially affected the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to do so in the future.  The nature of future monetary policies and the effect of such policies on the business and earnings of the company and its subsidiaries cannot be accurately predicted.

INSURANCE ACTIVITIES

Subsidiaries of Bancshares sell various types of insurance as agents in the State of Tennessee.  Insurance activities are subject to regulation by the states in which such business is transacted.  Although most of such regulation focuses on insurance companies and their insurance products, insurance agents and their activities are also subject to regulation by the states, including, among other things, licensing and marketing and sales practices.

-6-


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The asset value and earnings of First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. (Company) and its subsidiaries as well as the value of its common stock is subject to various types of risks.  The ability of the Company to continue its history of strong financial performance and return on investment is dependent on the ability to continue to effectively manage multiple areas of risk.  Significant risks can be broadly divided into three categories:  credit risk, market risk and operational risks.  Such risk categories are discussed as follows:

CREDIT RISK

Credit risks are risks to earnings and capital that a borrower may fail to meet the terms of any contract with the Bank.  Many factors may impact the risk of credit losses on loans and include but are not limited to types and terms of loans within the portfolio, creditworthiness of borrowers, and the value and marketability of collateral securing various loans.  Changes in general economic conditions of markets served also impact the risk of credit losses.  Some credit losses are expected and the levels of losses may vary over time.  Credit risks are managed throughout the lending process beginning with strict underwriting guidelines designed to control risks and limit exposure.  Then, management uses various assumptions and judgments to evaluate on a quarterly basis the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as well as regulatory guidelines.  If management's estimate of credit losses proves to be incorrect resulting in an allowance for loan losses inadequate to absorb losses or if regulatory authorities require an increase to the allowance as a result of their examination process, earnings and capital could be significantly and adversely impacted.

MARKET RISK

Market risk consists primarily of interest rate and liquidity risk.  Interest income on loans and investments is the largest source of income and interest expense on deposits and borrowings is the largest expense of the Company.  The level and volatility of interest rates directly impact the Company's earnings and capital.  Interest rates are largely driven by monetary policies set by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and the shape of the yield curve.  The FOMC sets interest rates to influence the cost and availability of money and credit to help promote national economic goals.  The shape of the yield curve is the relationship of shorter-term rates to longer-term rates.  The FOMC began a series of rate increases that resulted in the Federal Reserve's discount rate increasing from 1.00% in June 2004 to 5.25% in June 2006.  Short-term rates increased steadily with increases in Federal funds rates but longer term rates lagged behind resulting in a flattened and then inverted yield curve by the end of 2005.  The yield curve remains inverted through December 2006.  The behavior of short-term rates compared to long-term rates over the last two years has compressed net interest margins for Bancshares and other financial institutions.  The unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale are also heavily influenced by the fluctuations in interest rates and the yield curve.  The changes in such unrealized gains and losses have an effect on the accumulated other comprehensive income component of equity. 

Competition is another significant factor that directly affects the net interest margin and therefore overall earnings of the Company.  Historically, banks competed with other banks.  As discussed in Competitive Environment section of Item 1, the Company now competes against a much broader range of entities that offer similar products and services.  Some of such entities include insurance companies, finance companies, credit unions, and industrial loan companies.  The Company must be able to compete in its markets in order to remain profitable.  Competition is often intense in the pricing of both loans and deposits and can lead to reduced earnings if the Company earns less on loans or pays more for deposits in order to compete against such a diverse mix of competitors.  Changes in technology and regulation, the trend of consolidations in the financial services industry, and competition for experienced, qualified employees also affect the Company's ability to compete. 

Liquidity risk relates to Bancshares' ability to meet its short-term financial obligations.  Bancshares is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiary bank as a primary source of funds.  Funding of the subsidiary bank is accomplished through diversified sources in order to manage liquidity risks.  The cost of such funding directly impacts financial results.  The quantity, quality and cost of funding sources available to Bancshares and its subsidiary bank could be significantly impacted by the following:  our financial results and organizational changes, changes in our loan portfolio or other assets, changes to our corporate and/or regulatory structure, general economic conditions, current interest rate market environment, changes in supervision and regulation of our industry.  See also Item 7A of this report for additional discussion of liquidity and interest rate sensitivity.

OPERATIONAL RISK

Transaction risk, compliance risk, strategic risk, and reputation risk are the primary operational risks.  Transaction risk is the risk to earnings and capital which could result from an inability to deliver products or services.  Transaction risk can arise from ineffective or inefficient processes, fraud, theft, breaches in data security, and exposure of other external threats or events.  Losses related to transaction risk can occur from within our organization or as a result of errors or disruption from a vendor or other outside party for which we have limited control, if any.  Two specific types of transaction risk include fraud risk and systemic risk.  The risk that a payment transaction will be initiated or altered in an attempt to misdirect or misappropriate funds.  Examples of fraud risk are embezzlement by a financial institution employee or by an interloper who gains unauthorized access to a system.  Another type of operational risk, systemic risk is the risk of inability of one funds transfer system participant to settle its commitments causes other participants to be unable to settle their commitments.  Risk management procedures to identify, measure, monitor and control these types of risk are critical to successful management of operational risks.

Compliance risk is the risk to capital and earnings as a result of violations of applicable laws, regulations and ethical standards.  Bancshares' board and executive management lead by example with a commitment to honesty and integrity which provide the foundation for the Company's core values.  The board and management also implemented and enforce a Code of Conduct which is posted on the company's website (www.firstcitizens-bank.com). 

The Company is subject to extensive regulation including banking and financial services laws, tax legislation, accounting standards and interpretations thereof.  Thus, certain activities may be restricted such as the ability to pay dividends, ability to participate in mergers and acquisitions, and location of offices.  The scope, complexity and cost of corporate governance, reporting and disclosure procedures required to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as well as other regulations have significantly increased compliance costs over the past three years.  Compliance costs are expected to continue to escalate at a significant level.  Legislation introduced or changed at the state or national level has the potential to impact the banking industry and its operating environment substantially.  The Company cannot determine whether such legislation will be enacted or the ultimate impact on the Company's financial position or earnings. 

Strategic risk arises from adverse business decisions or improper implementation of strategic action plans.  Current strategies include growth and development of current markets as well as expansion into new markets.  In addition to market expansion geographically, the range of products and services offered is also being expanded to include a more diverse range of products and services, including but not limited to new electronic banking products and services for commercial customers.  If implementation of market and product strategies is ineffective, financial results could be adversely impacted. 

Reputation risk is the risk of negative public opinion.  The public perception of Bancshares' ability to conduct business and expand our customer base is affected by practices of our board, management and employees.  Significant relationships with vendors, customers and other external parties may also affect our reputation.  Adverse perceptions about our business practices or practices of those with whom we have significant relationships, could adversely impact our financial results or condition.  The board and executive management oversee the management of reputation risks.  

-7-


ITEM 1B UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 None. 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

First Citizens owns and occupies the followings properties:

All properties except for the Banking Annex (Operations Center) are owned by First Citizens and there are no liens or encumbrances against any properties owned by First Citizens.  All of the properties described above are adequate and appropriate facilities to provide banking services as noted and are adequate to handle growth expected in the foreseeable future.  As growth continues or needs change, individual property enhancements or additional properties will be evaluated if considered necessary.

-8-


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Various legal claims arise from time to time through the normal course of business of the Company and its subsidiaries.  There is no material pending or threatened litigation as of December 31, 2006.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

During the fourth quarter of the year ending December 31, 2006, there were no meetings, annual or special, of the shareholders of Bancshares. No matters were submitted to a vote of the shareholders nor were proxies solicited by management or any other person.

PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

As of December 31, 2006, there were 1,070 shareholders of Bancshares' common stock. Bancshares' common stock is not actively traded on any market.  The following graph reflects the Company's cumulative return (including dividends) as compared to the S&P 500 and Southeast Bank Stocks over a five-year period:

Per share prices reflected in the following table are based on records of actual sales during stated time periods of which management of Bancshares is aware. These records may not include all sales during these time periods if sale prices were not reported to First Citizens in connection with a transfer of shares.  Range of stock prices for 2006 and 2005 by quarter is as follows:

Quarter Ended

Low

High

March 31, 2005

 $

31.00 

 $

32.75 

June 30, 2005

 $

31.00 

 $

32.00 

September 30, 2005

 $

32.00 

 $

32.00 

December 31, 2005

 $

32.00 

 $

33.00 

March 31, 2006

 $

33.00 

 $

33.00 

June 30, 2006

 $

33.00 

 $

33.00 

September 30, 2006

 $

33.00 

 $

34.00 

December 31, 2006

 $

34.00 

 $

34.00 

Dividends paid per share were $1.16 in 2006 and $1.12 in 2005.  Dividends were paid quarterly as follows for 2006 and 2005:

2006

2005

Dividends

Dividends

Quarter Declared:

Per Share

Per Share

 First Quarter

 $

0.29 

 $

0.28 

 Second Quarter

 $

0.29 

 $

0.28 

 Third Quarter

 $

0.29 

 $

0.28 

 Fourth Quarter

 $

0.29 

 $

0.28 

     Total

 $

1.16 

 $

1.12 

Future dividends will depend on Bancshares' earnings, financial condition, regulatory capital levels and other factors, which the Board of Directors of Bancshares considers relevant. 

-9-


The Company had no publicly announced plans or programs for purchase of stock during the periods presented.  The Company purchased 4,578 shares at a weighted average cost of $33.66 per share for the year ended December 31, 2006.  The number of shares of treasury stock repurchased in open-market transactions not pursuant to publicly announced plans or programs and the average price paid by month for the most recent fiscal quarter is as follows:

Weighted

No. of

Average

Shares

Price Paid

Purchased

Per Share

2006

October

190 

34.00 

November

840 

34.00 

December

1,048 

34.00 

   Total

2,078 

 $

34.00 

The Company sold 1,664 shares of treasury stock in 2006 at a weighted average price of $34.00 per share.  Proceeds from such sales were used to reacquire additional treasury shares. 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents selected financial data for Bancshares for the twelve months ended December 31, for the years indicated:

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Net Interest & Fee Income

 $

27,970 

 $

26,922 

 $

25,668 

 $

25,354 

 $

24,262 

Gross Interest Income

 $

52,112 

 $

44,614 

 $

39,017 

 $

39,506 

 $

38,970 

Income From Continuing Operations

 $

9,157 

 $

8,665 

 $

8,049 

 $

7,820 

 $

7,838 

Net Income Per Common Share

 $

2.52 

 $

2.38 

 $

2.20 

 $

2.14 

 $

2.14 

Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share

 $

1.16 

 $

1.12 

 $

1.12 

 $

1.08 

 $

1.04 

Total Assets at Year End

 $

831,420 

 $

815,749 

 $

773,204 

 $

726,104 

 $

694,198 

Long Term Obligations (1)

 $

59,538 

 $

78,128 

 $

84,481 

 $

83,314 

 $

83,881 

Allowances For Loan Losses as a % Loans

1.13 %

1.25 %

1.16 %

1.25 %

1.24 %

Allowances For Loan Losses as a % of

 Non-Performing Loans

471.96 %

349.36 %

262.25 %

438.36 %

144.31 %

Loans 90 Days Past Due as a  % of Loans

0.24 %

0.36 %

0.44 %

0.04 %

0.37 %

(1)  Long-Term Obligations consist of FHLB advances and acquisition debts funded by a line of credit with First Tennessee Bank and trust-preferred securities.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

See Banking Business under Item 1 of this report regarding details of subsidiaries of the bank and holding company and what types of activities each engage in. 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Strong financial performance continues in 2006 as evidenced by a return on average equity in 2006 of 13.88% compared to 13.71% and 13.56% in 2005 and 2004, respectively.  Return on assets is 1.10%, 1.10% and 1.08% for 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.  Earnings per share increased to $2.52 for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $2.38 per share in 2005.  Growth in earnings is primarily a result of 4.8 percent growth in average earning assets, higher interest rate environment in 2006 compared to 2005, and reduced provision for loan losses in 2006 compared to 2005.

The dividend payout ratio in 2006 was 47.06% and the dividend yield of 3.61% continues to exceed peer group banks in the Southeast region.  Our goal continues to be providing shareholder returns that exceed peer group banks and is achieved by focusing efforts on deploying capital resources in a manner that supports long-term shareholder value.  Investments in more metropolitan Southwest Tennessee markets afforded the company opportunities to expand the customer base and extend First Citizens' brand outside Northwest Tennessee.  This prudent utilization of capital will support future growth and development of both assets and earnings. 

Growth in net interest margins has become increasingly difficult to achieve for many financial institutions including First Citizens.  The trend of slowing growth in net interest margins has taken place over several years but is anticipated to be long term.  Margins have been compressed the past few quarters by various factors including slower loan growth, inverted position of the bond yield curve, and recent deposit trends.  Slow loan growth has resulted in loans being priced more competitively which result in smaller margins.  Costs of funding have increased more rapidly than interest income on loans and investments as pricing on time deposits and certain interest bearing deposit products have been increased to keep pace with competition in the current market environment.  Interest rate risk position for the Company is near neutral which also contributes to flat net interest margins.  Additional information is noted in Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity section included in Item 7A of this report. 

As evidenced in the cash flow statements, Bancshares continues to deploy capital for purchases of premises and equipment totaling $2.7 million, $5.9 million and $3.5 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.  Opportunity cost on the 2006 purchases is approximately $193 thousand based on the average yield on earning assets of 7.14 percent, as the funds likely would have been invested in loans or investments if fixed assets were not purchased.  Over the past four years, four new branches have been constructed.  In 2006, three of the four, Martin, Arlington and Oakland, operated at a profit.  The fourth, Collierville, is expected to become profitable during first quarter 2007.  Also in 2006, the Company converted its annex building to the main headquarters into a new Operations Center at a cost of approximately $2 million.  The Operations Center provides a means for an expedited workflow, improved operational organization as well as improved protection and uninterrupted power in case of a natural disaster.  Increased capacity and efficiencies of the Operations C enter will support First Citizens' expansion efforts into two new markets in 2007. 

-10-


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting and reporting of First Citizens Bancshares and its subsidiaries conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and follow general practices within the industry.  Preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The company's estimates are based on historical experience, information supplied from professionals, regulators and others believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances.  Accounting estimates are considered critical if (1) management is required to make assumptions or judgments about items that are highly uncertain at the time estimates are made, and (2) different estimates reasonably could have been used during the current period or changes in such estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, that could have a material impact on presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. 

The development, selection and disclosure of critical accounting policies are discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.  Due to the potential impact on the financial condition or results of operations and the required subjective or complex judgments involved, management believes its critical accounting policies to consist of the allowance for loan losses, fair value of financial instruments, and goodwill and assessment of impairment.

Allowance For Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents management's best estimate of inherent losses in the existing loan portfolio.  Management's policy is to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to absorb reasonably estimated and probable losses within the portfolio.  The company believes the loan loss reserve estimate is a critical accounting estimate because:  changes can materially affect bad debt expense on the income statement, changes in the borrower's cash flows can impact the reserve, and estimates must be made at the balance sheet date and also into the future in reference to the reserve.  While management uses the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments may be necessary if economic or other conditions change materially.  The Loan Portfolio Analysis included in this Management's Discussion and Analysis provides further detail regarding how loans are monitored and evaluated in relation to the determination of the allowance for loan losses.  Also, refer to Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report.

Fair Value Of Financial Instruments

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that certain assets and liabilities be carried on the balance sheet at fair value.  Furthermore, fair value of financial instruments is required to be disclosed as a part of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for other assets and liabilities.  Fair values are volatile and may be influenced by a number of factors, including market interest rates, prepayment speeds, discount rates, the shape of yield curves and the credit worthiness of counter parties. 

Fair values for the majority of First Citizens' available-for-sale investment securities are based on quoted market prices from actively traded markets.  In instances where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted prices of similar instruments with adjustment for relevant distinctions (e.g., size of issue, interest rate, etc.). 

Fair value of the only derivative held by the company is determined using a combination of quoted market rates for similar instruments and quantitative models based on market inputs including rate, price and index scenarios to generate continuous yield or pricing curves and volatility factors.  Third party vendors are used to obtain fair value of available-for-sale securities and the cash flow hedge. 

See also the Fair Value of Financial Instruments footnote in the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report. 

Goodwill

The Company's policy is to review goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis unless an event occurs that could potentially impair the goodwill amount.  Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over fair value assigned to assets and liabilities.  Management believes accounting estimates associated with determining fair value, as part of the goodwill test is a critical accounting estimate because estimates and assumptions are made based on prevailing market factors, historical earnings and multiples and other contingencies.  See also the Goodwill footnote in the Company's  Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for additional policy information.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140

In February 2006, Financial Account Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 155-Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 (SFAS 155). SFAS 155 amends FASB Statements No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The purpose of this statement is to resolve issues addressed in Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, "Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets."  The statement becomes effective at the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006.  Adoption of this statement has no material impact on Bancshares' consolidated financial statements.

-11-


Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets

In March 2006, FASB issued SFAS 156 Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.  SFAS 156 provides guidance for the accounting of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities.  The statement becomes effective at the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006.  Adoption of this statement has no material impact on Bancshares' consolidated financial statements.

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
 

In July 2006, Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" (FIN 48) was issued.  This interpretation was issued to clarify accounting for uncertainty in tax positions recognized in financial statements.  FIN 48 provides guidance for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  FIN 48 also provides guidance on the classification and disclosure of uncertain tax positions in financial statements.  Adoption of FIN 48 requires a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance sheet of retained earnings for any difference between the net amounts of assets and liabilities previously recognized and those determined under the new guidance for all open tax positions. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures and transitions.  FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.  Adoption of this statement has no material impact on Bancshares' consolidated financial statements.

 

Fair Value Measurements

In September 2006, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" (SFAS 157).  SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  This statement was issued to address the need for increased consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and for expanded disclosures about fair value measurements.  The statement emphasizes that fair value measurement should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.  Also, SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes information used to develop those assumptions.  SFAS is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  Adoption of this statement is not expected to materially impact Bancshares' consolidated financial statements.

Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans

 

In September 2006, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, "Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)" (SFAS 158).  This standard requires employers to recognize the underfunded or overfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in the funded status in the year in which the changes occur through accumulated other comprehensive income. Additionally, SFAS No. 158 requires employers to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position.  The new reporting and related disclosure requirement rules in SFAS 158 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006.  The new measurement date requirements apply to fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008.  Adoption of this statement has no material impact on Bancshares' consolidated financial statements.

 

Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements

In September 2006, the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, "Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements" (SAB 108).  This bulletin is issued to address diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement misstatements and the potential under current practice for the build up of improper amounts on the balance sheet.  SAB 108 requires an analysis of misstatements using both an income statement (rollover) approach and a balance sheet (iron curtain) approach in assessing materiality and provides guidance for correcting errors under this dual perspective.  SAB 108 must be applied to annual financial statements for the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006.  Adoption of this statement has no material impact on Bancshares' consolidated financial statements.

Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements

In September 2006, FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 06-4, "Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements" (EITF 06-4).  EITF 06-4 addresses accounting for split-dollar life insurance arrangements after the employer purchases a life insurance policy on the covered employee.  This EITF states that an obligation arises as a result of a substantive agreement with an employee to provide future postretirement benefits.  Under this issue, the obligation is not settled upon entering into an insurance arrangement. Since the obligation is not settled, a liability should be recognized in accordance with applicable authoritative guidance.  EITF 06-4 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007.  The adoption of EITF 06-4 is not expected to have a material impact on Bancshares' consolidated financial statements.

Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance

In September 2006, FASB ratified EITF 06-5, "Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance-Determining the Amount that Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4, Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance."  This issue addresses determination of the amount that could be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date in applying FTB 85-4 and if the determination should be on an individual or group policy basis.  EITF 06-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.  The adoption of EITF 06-5 is not expected to have a material impact on Bancshares' consolidated financial statements.

The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159 "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities" to permit entities to choose to measure certain financial instruments at fair value.  This statement is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement with the intent to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the entity also elects to apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.  Bancshares is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 159 but does not anticipate a material effect on consolidated financial statements.

-12-


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Bancshares reports consolidated net income of $9.16 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $8.67 million in 2005 and $8.0 million in 2004.  Earnings per share increased to $2.52 per share for 2006 compared to $2.38 per share for 2005 and $2.20 per share in 2004. Return on average assets was 1.10%, 1.10%, and 1.08% for the years ending December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.  Return on average equity is 13.88%, 13.71%, and 13.56% for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.  Increased earnings and return on average equity in 2006 are the result of modest balance sheet growth and reduced provision for loan losses.

Balance sheet growth of less than 2 percent in 2006 was unusually slow compared to historical trends in the range of 6%-8% annually.  Also unusual compared to prior years, investments growth of $16 million or 10% outpaced loan growth at $2 million or less than one percent.  Overall, balance sheet growth was diluted by slow loan growth in the second half of 2006 coupled with a reduction in borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB).   Loan growth was moderate at approximately 5% from December 31, 2005 to June 30, 2006 primarily as a result of advances on agricultural production lines as well as advances on construction loans.  As such lines were reduced in third and fourth quarters 2006, annual loan growth for 2006 slowed to less than one percent.  As slow loan demand and the inverted yield curve exerted pressures on net interest margins, borrowings from FHLB were reduced by $17.5 million. 

Asset quality is considered strong despite unfavorable trends in non-performing assets and net charge-offs in 2006 compared to 2005.  Non-performing loans and other real estate as a percent of total loans plus other real estate at December 31, 2006 were 0.57% compared to 0.38% at December 31, 2005 and peer at 0.71% as reported in the December 31, 2006 Uniform Bank Performance Report for Bancshares' subsidiary bank.  Net charge-offs in 2006 were $1.3 million compared to $468 thousand in 2005.  The allowance for loan loss reserve as a percent of non-performing assets was 198.37%, 327.74%, 229.54%, 316.97%, and 99.21% for the years 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.  Other Real Estate Owned increased from $129 thousand to $1.8 million.  Increases in loan losses and other real estate owned are primarily driven by two problem credits which are considered isolated incidents and not representative of trends inherent in the entire portfolio. 

Although an increase in other real estate and net charge-offs was experienced in 2006, provision for loan losses was reduced in 2006 as the reserve balance was considered adequate without additional provision.  Additions made to the reserve account, as a percent of net charge offs for 2006 was 44.41% compared to 167.56% in 2005.  The reserve for potential loan losses as a percent of total portfolio ended the year at 1.13% which is slightly below the range of 1.15% to 1.25% maintained the last five years.  Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans for peer is 1.20% per the most recent Uniform Bank Performance Report and is consistent with the peer average range over the last five years of 1.20% to 1.30%.  See additional information regarding the allowance for loan losses in Loan Portfolio Analysis below and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report.

The accompanying Summary Average Balance Sheet and Net Interest Income Schedule indicate a slight decline in net yield on average earning assets at 3.89% for year 2006 compared to 3.92% for 2005.  This is primarily due to the fairly neutral position of the balance sheet in terms of interest rate risk.  Thus, increases in yields on interest-earning assets were outpaced by increases in the costs of interest-bearing liabilities during 2006 primarily due to growth in time deposits.  First Citizens along with other financial institutions continued to battle net interest margins compressed by an inverted yield curve in 2006.  The inverted yield curve coupled with slower loan demand during the second half of 2006 contributed to the decline in net interest margin.  Slow loan demand has results in more competitive pricing which also contributes to margin pressures.  See Item 7A of this report for additional information regarding interest rate risk and market sensitivity. 

Although the inverted yield curve compressed net interest margin, stability in low long-term mortgage rates positively impacts loan fee income from secondary mortgage activity.  Although some urban markets began seeing declines in 2006, markets served by First Citizens continued to deliver strong mortgage activity.  Gross income and fees recorded from this activity totaled $1.2 million in 2006, $1.2 million in 2005 and $1.0 million in 2004.  As long-term mortgage rates remain reasonable and markets appear stable, mortgage income trends are expected to continue in 2007.

The effective tax rate is 24% in 2006 compared to 26% and 28% in 2005 and 2004, respectively.  The effective tax rate and changes therein are impacted by fluctuations in certain factors, including but not limited to the level of tax-free investments within our investment portfolio, tax-exempt earnings on bank owned life insurance policies, certain tax benefits which result from ESOP dividends and payouts, and other factors incidental to the financial services business.  Increased deduction related to the ESOP dividends and payouts and tax-exempt interest earned in the investment portfolio are the largest contributors to the decrease in effective rate for the current year.

-13-


Interest-earning assets in 2006 averaged $742 million at an average rate of 7.14% compared to $709 million at an average rate of 6.42% in 2005, and $675 million at an average rate of 5.89% in 2004.  Interest bearing liabilities at year end averaged $670 million at a cost of 3.60% compared to $645 million at a cost of 2.74% in 2005, and $610 million at a rate of 2.19% in 2004.  The following presents the year-to-date daily average balance sheet and net interest income analysis (in thousands):

SUMMARY - AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS

 

2006

 

 

2005

 

2004

Average

 

Average

Average

Average

Average

Average

Balance

Interest

Rate

Balance

Interest

Rate

Balance

Interest

Rate

ASSETS

 

 

 

Interest Earning

 

 

 

 Assets:

 

 

 

     Loans (1) (2) (3)

 $

557,088 

 $

43,557 

7.82 %

 $

538,789 

 $

37,991 

7.05 %

 $

513,678 

 $

33,302 

6.48 %

     Investment Securities:

 

        Taxable

128,205 

6,078 

4.74 %

117,487 

4,704 

4.00 %

117,835 

4,169 

3.54 %

        Tax  Exempt (4)

43,135 

2,738 

6.35 %

40,567 

2,512 

6.19 %

38,064 

2,226 

5.85 %

     Interest Earning

 

        Deposits

703 

37 

5.26 %

711 

20 

2.81 %

732 

0.41 %

     Federal Funds Sold

13,586 

633 

4.66 %

11,134 

241 

2.16 %

5,041 

74 

1.47 %

Total Interest

 

  Earning Assets

 $

742,717 

 $

53,043 

7.14 %

 $

708,688 

 $

45,468 

6.42 %

 $

675,350 

 $

39,774 

5.89 %

 

 

 

Non-Interest Earning

 

 

 

   Assets:

 

 

 

     Cash and Due From Banks

16,043 

 

 

18,619 

15,835 

     Property and Equipment

28,554 

 

 

25,817 

22,293 

     Other Assets

44,119 

 

 

36,281 

33,332 

         Total Assets

 $

831,433 

 

 

 $

789,405 

 $

746,810 

-14-


SUMMARY - AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS (cont'd)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

2005

 

2004

Average

 

Average

Average

Average

Average

Average

Balance

Interest

Rate

Balance

Interest

Rate

Balance

Interest

Rate

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND

 

 

 

  SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:

 

 

 

   Interest Bearing Liabilities:

 

 

 

      Savings Deposit

 $

197,115 

 $

3,264 

1.66 %

 $

190,106 

 $

2,242 

1.18 %

 $

181,164 

 $

1,288 

0.71%

      Time Deposits

365,839 

15,568 

4.26 %

331,973 

10,246 

3.09 %

311,671 

7,348 

2.36%

      Federal Funds Purchased

 

 

 

          And Other Interest

 

 

 

          Bearing Liabilities

107,238 

5,310 

4.95 %

122,754 

5,204 

4.24 %

117,316 

4,713 

4.02%

              Total Interest Bearing

 

 

 

                  Liabilities

 $

670,192 

 $

24,142 

3.60 %

 $

644,833 

 $

17,692 

2.74 %

 $

610,151 

 $

13,349 

2.19%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Interest Bearing Liabilities:

 

 

 

     Demand Deposits

90,360 

 

 

78,586 

72,272 

     Other Liabilities

4,911 

 

 

2,788 

5,036 

         Total Liabilities

 $

765,463 

 

 

 $

726,207 

 $

687,459 

SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

 $

65,970 

 

 

 $

63,198 

 $

59,351 

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND

 

 

 

  SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

 $

831,433 

 

 

 $

789,405 

 $

746,810 

 

 

 

NET INTEREST INCOME

 

 $

28,901 

 

 $

27,776 

 $

26,425 

 

 

 

 

 

NET YIELD ON AVERAGE

 

 

 

  EARNING ASSETS

 

 

3.89  %

3.92  %

3.91 %

(1)           Loan totals are shown net of unearned income and loan loss reserves.

(2)           Fee Income is included in interest income and the computations of the yield on loans. 

(3)           Includes loans on non-accrual status.

(4)           Interest and rates on securities, which are non-taxable for federal income tax purposes, are presented on a taxable equivalent basis.

-15-


VOLUME/RATE ANALYSIS

The following table is an analysis of the impact of the changes in balances and rates on interest income and interest expense changes from 2006 to 2005 as well as from 2005 to 2004:

2006 to 2005

 

 

2005 to 2004

Due to Changes in:

 

 

 

Due to Changes in:

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

Total

Average

 

Average

 

Increase

 

Average

 

Average

 

Increase

Volume

 

Rate

 

(Decrease)

 

Volume

 

Rate

 

(Decrease)

Interest Earned On:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans

 $

1,431 

 $

4,135 

 $

5,566 

 $

1,771 

 $

2,918 

 $

4,689 

Taxable Investments

508 

866 

1,374 

(14)

549 

535 

Tax Exempt Investment

 Securities

163 

63 

226 

155 

131 

286 

Interest Bearing

 Deposits With Other

 Banks

17 

17 

(1)

18 

17 

Federal Funds Sold and

 Securities Purchased

 Under Agreements to Resell

114 

278 

392 

132 

35 

167 

Lease Financing

TOTAL INTEREST EARNING

 ASSETS

 $

2,216 

 $

5,359 

 $

7,575 

 $

2,043 

 $

3,651 

 $

5,694 

Interest Expense On:

 Savings Deposits

116 

906 

1,022 

105 

849 

954 

 Time Deposits

1,441 

3,881 

5,322 

627 

2,271 

2,898 

 Federal Funds Purchased

     and Securities Sold Under

     Agreements to Repurchase

(768)

874 

106 

231 

260 

491 

TOTAL INTEREST EARNING

 LIABILITIES

789 

5,661 

6,450 

963 

3,380 

4,343 

NET INTEREST EARNINGS

 $

1,427 

 $

(302)

 $

1,125 

 $

1,080 

 $

271 

 $

1,351 

NON-INTEREST INCOME

The following table compares non-interest income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:

 

Increase

 

 

Increase

 

 

Total

(Decrease)

 

Total

(Decrease)

 

Total

2006

Amount

Percentage

2005

Amount

Percentage

2004

Services Charges on

   Deposit Accounts

 $

6,059 

 $

107 

1.80 %

 $

5,952 

 $

393 

7.07 %

 $

5,559 

 Trust Fees

940 

(23)

-2.39 %

963 

17 

1.80 %

946 

 Brokerage

1,357 

50 

3.83 %

1,307 

147 

12.67 %

1,160 

Earnings on Bank Owned

   Life Insurance Policies

681 

(233)

-25.49 %

914 

471 

106.32 %

443 

 Other

1,611 

(97)

-5.68 %

1,708 

422 

32.81 %

1,286 

Total Non-Interest Income

 $

10,648 

 $

(196)

-1.81 %

 $

10,844 

 $

1,450 

15.44 %

 $

9,394 

-16-


Non-interest income decreased $196 thousand in 2006 primarily due to decreased earnings on bank owned life insurance (BOLI).  The decrease in earnings on BOLI is due to non-recurring income earned in 2005 of approximately $260 thousand from a death benefit received on a policy inherited through a prior bank acquisition.  In year 2006, non-interest income (fee income) contributed 17.0% of total revenue compared to 19.5% and 19.4% for the same periods in 2005 and 2004, respectively.  Overdraft fees are the largest component of service charges on deposit accounts and increased approximately 2% in 2006.  Brokerage fees increased as a result of further development of brokerage services in our newer markets.

Income from First Citizens/White and Associates Insurance Company, LLC is included in other non-interest income.   In 2004, this subsidiary brought suit to protect certain rights and earnings in 2004 were down due to related legal fees incurred.  Settlement of the subsidiary's litigation occurred early in 2005 in favor of the subsidiary and First Citizens' portion of the gain of approximately $150,000 was recorded in first quarter of 2005.  The settlement of the suit along with an overall increase in revenue from the company contributed approximately $400 thousand of the overall positive variance in non-interest income from 2004 to 2005.  Income from this subsidiary decreased $56 thousand in 2006 compared to 2005 primarily due to the non-recurring income from the litigation settlement in 2005.  Bancshares' portion of other non-interest income generated by First Citizens/White and Associates Insurance Company, LLC for the years ending 2006, 2005, and 2004 totaled $653,000, $709,000, and $315,000, respectively.   

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

The following table compares non-interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):

 

 

Increase

 

 

 

 

 

Increase

 

 

 

 

Total

 

(Decrease)

 

 

 

Total

 

(Decrease)

 

 

 

Total

2006

 

Amount

 

Percentage

 

2005

 

Amount

 

Percentage

 

2004

Salaries & Employee

   Benefits

 $

15,074 

 $

568 

3.92 %

 $

14,506 

 $

1,176 

8.82 %

 $

13,330 

Occupancy Expense

4,503 

216 

5.04 %

4,287 

384 

9.84 %

3,903 

Other Operating Expense

6,351 

189 

3.07 %

6,162 

560 

10.00 %

5,602 

Total Non-Interest Expense

 $

25,928 

 $

973 

3.90 %

 $

24,955 

 $

2,120 

9.28 %

 $

22,835 

The non-interest expense category is dominated by salaries and benefits expense and comprises 58 percent of the total in 2006, and 58 and 56 percent in years 2005 and 2004, respectively.  Employees receive performance-based incentives based on factors including achievement of a certain Return on Equity level (calculated excluding incentives at the holding company level), accomplishing annual budget goals and attaining or exceeding business development goals.  Incentive pay totaled 10.95% of salaries and benefits compared to 11.89% in 2005 and 11.24% in 2004.  The significant expense associated with salaries and benefits is consistent with Bancshares' strategic plan to hire and retain high quality employees to provide outstanding customer service and strive for exceptional shareholder returns. 

The efficiency ratio is a measurement of non-interest expense as a percentage of total revenue.  A comparison of the efficiency ratio for the years 2006, 2005 and 2004 reflects ratios of 65.44%, 64.62% and 65.46%, respectively. 

The following table compares assets per employee (in thousands) for Bancshares compared to peer.  Peer information is obtained from Uniform Bank Performance Reports (UBPR) for the periods noted.

 

Assets Per Employee

Assets Per Employee

December 31

FCNB

 Peer Groups

2006

 $

3,121 

 $

3,940 

2005

 $

2,967 

 $

3,860 

2004

 $

2,903 

 $

3,700 

2003

 $

2,916 

 $

3,540 

2002

 $

2,712 

 $

3,400 

Comparison of assets per employee for the Company compared to its peers reveals that the Company is more heavily staffed than its counterparts.  This is primarily a result of the growth through acquisitions and new branches that has occurred over the past five years.  New branches have an inefficient assets-per-employee ratio and thus, dilute the total assets per employee ratio as compared to peer.  As expected, this comparison improved during 2006, as no new branches or loan production offices were added during the year.  As the company expands into two new markets in 2007, assets per employee for our company will likely continue to be less than peer.  Our commitment to the highest level of customer service may also cause the Company to continue at a level below peer due to staff required to provide exceptional level of customer service supported by our strategic objectives. 

-17-


Increased occupancy expense is a result of increased depreciation and technology expenses compared to prior years due to depreciation of fixed assets related to the newer branches as well as the new operations center.  While efforts are made to ensure efficiencies in these areas, the expansion, data integrity/security and customer service strategies adopted by the board will continue to exert pressure on occupancy and depreciation expense we continue to expand into new markets. 

Other operating expenses for 2006 increased approximately 3% and 10% in 2006 and 2005, respectively, primarily due to the digestion of newer branches and as a result of increasing regulatory burdens associated with Sarbanes-Oxley and Bancshares becoming an accelerated filer with the SEC during 2005.  Implementation costs for this act were approximately $200,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005 and include increased audit fees, fees paid to directors serving on a newly appointed Corporate Governance Committee, additional personnel costs, consulting and technology costs.  Advertising costs increased $197 thousand in 2005 as a result of efforts to improve brand recognition of First Citizens in newer markets.  Advertising costs continued at a level comparable to 2005 with a modest increase of $13 thousand as First Citizens continued efforts to increase brand awareness with a focus on promoting and providing exceptional customer experiences. 

No impairment of goodwill has been recognized since the adoption of SFAS 142 in 2002.  Goodwill is 1.45% of total assets and 18.58% of total capital as of December 31, 2006.

INVESTMENT SECURITIES ANALYSIS

The following presents the composition of securities for the last five years:

December 31,

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

U. S. Treasury & Government Agencies

 $

127,602 

 $

112,803 

 $

101,105 

 $

102,117 

 $

101,415 

State & Political Subdivisions

44,338 

41,776 

39,352 

38,719 

35,906 

All Others

5,436 

6,589 

6,680 

8,844 

5,551 

     Total Investment Securities

 $

177,376 

 $

161,168 

 $

147,137 

 $

149,680 

 $

142,872 

MATURITY AND YIELD ON SECURITIES - DECEMBER 31, 2006

The following presents contractual maturities and yields by category for debt securities:

Maturing

Maturing

Maturing

After One

After Five

Maturing

Within One

Year Within

Years Within

After Ten

Year

Five Years

Ten Years

Years

Amount

 

Yield

 

Amount

 

Yield

 

Amount

 

Yield

 

Amount

 

Yield

 

Total

U. S. Treasury and

 Government Agencies

 $

9,312 

4.32 %

 $

40,892 

5.92 %

 $

22,016 

4.60 %

 $

55,382 

5.73 %

 $

127,602 

State and Political

 Subdivisions*

1,456 

5.79 %

8,439 

5.38 %

13,250 

7.22 %

21,483 

6.91 %

44,628 

All Others

0.00 %

1,007 

6.67 %

4,087 

8.10 %

5,094 

 Total Debt Securities

 $

10,768 

 $

50,338 

 $

35,266 

 $

80,952 

 $

177,324 

Equity Securities

 $

52 

     Total

 $

177,376 

*Yields on tax-exempt investments are stated on a tax-equivalent basis calculated using a federal statutory rate of 34 percent.

HELD TO MATURITY & AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES - DECEMBER 31, 2006

Held to Maturity

 

Available for Sale

Amortized

Fair

Amortized

Fair

Cost

 

Value

 

Cost

 

Value

U. S. Treasury Securities

 $

 $

 $

1,803 

 $

1,793 

U. S. Government Agencies and Corporation Obligations

127,423 

125,809 

Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions in

   the United States :

     Taxable Securities

     Tax-exempt Securities

290 

291 

42,666 

44,338 

U. S. Securities:

 Other Debt Securities

4,906 

5,094 

 Equity Securities

10 

52 

           Total

 $

290 

 $

291 

 $

176,808 

 $

177,086 

In addition to amounts presented above, the Bank also has $5.5 million in Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock, recorded at cost.  FHLB and FRB stocks are listed as a separate line item on the Consolidated Balance Sheets included in Item 8 of this report.

-18-


Investments increased approximately $16 million or 10% in 2006 during a period of slow loan growth.  Purchases in 2006 were accretive to overall yields on investments.  Objectives of investment portfolio management are to provide safety of principal, adequate liquidity, insulate GAAP capital against excessive changes in market value, insulate earnings from excessive change, and optimize investment performance.  Investments also serve as collateral for government, public funds, and large deposit accounts that exceed Federal Deposit Insured limits.  Pledged investments at year-end 2006 had a fair market value of $122 million.  Total held-to-maturity and available-for-sale investments at December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 were $177 million, $161 million, and $147 million, respectively.  The average expected life is 4.4 years, 4.6 years, and 4.2 years, for 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.  Portfolio yields steadily improved over the past three years.  Tax equivalent yield on investment securities in 2006 improved to 5.21 percent from 4.57 percent in 2005.

The company classifies investments by intent into trading, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity categories in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  The company held no securities in the trading category for any period presented in this report and does not expect to in 2007.  Bancshares' investment strategy is to classify most of the portfolio as available-for-sale, which are carried on the balance sheet at fair market value.  Classification of available-for-sale investments allows flexibility to actively manage the portfolio under various market conditions.  U. S. Treasuries and Agencies (including mortgage-backed securities) account for 72 percent and 70 percent of the investment portfolio as of year end 2006 and 2005, respectively.  Mortgage related investments comprise the largest percentage of U. S. Treasuries and Agencies category and account for approximately 45 percent and 40 percent of total portfolio as of year-end 2006 and 2005, respectively.  Statements of Cash Flows included in Item 8 of this report reflect reduced cash flows in 2006 as a result of the current rate environment and the company's strategy over the past 12 months to extend portfolio duration.  Cash flows for 2007 are projected to be approximately $25 million.  Bancshares continues to pursue strategies that provide a balance between steady cash flows and maintaining or improving current yields. 

Also purchased were certain derivative financial instruments as described in Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements, primarily to hedge interest rate fluctuations.

The following table indicates by category unrealized gains and losses within the available-for-sale portfolio as of December 31, 2006 (in thousands):

Unrealized

Gains

 

Losses

 

Net

U. S. Treasury Securities and Obligations of U. S.

 Government Agencies and Corporations

 $

280 

 $

(1,903)

 $

(1,623)

Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions

1,792 

(121)

1,671 

All Others

230 

230 

     Total

 $

2,302 

 $

(2,024)

 $

278 

LOAN PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS

The following compares the loan portfolio mix as of year-end for the last five years:

December 31,

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Real Estate Loans:

   Construction

 $

86,206 

 $

74,817 

 $

99,028 

 $

71,599 

 $

57,758 

   Mortgage*

 $

344,288 

 $

355,792 

 $

321,957 

 $

305,077 

 $

285,759 

Commercial, Financial and

 Agricultural Loans

 $

80,033 

 $

78,086 

 $

72,330 

 $

70,658 

 $

67,732 

Installment Loans to

 Individuals

 $

36,735 

 $

37,761 

 $

38,550 

 $

37,401 

 $

39,089 

Other Loans

 $

5,021 

 $

3,804 

 $

4,147 

 $

3,372 

 $

3,142 

 Total Loans

 $

552,283 

 $

550,260 

 $

536,012 

 $

488,107 

 $

453,480 

*Includes mortgage loans to be sold in secondary market.  Secondary market mortgages total $3.4 million, $3.0 million, $1.3 million, $2.4 million, and $5.9 million for 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

CHANGES IN LOAN CATEGORIES

Loan growth slowed to less than 1% for the year ended December 31, 2006.  The following details the breakdown of that growth by category for 2006 (in thousands):

Increase

Percent

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

Real Estate Loans:

 Construction

 $

11,389 

15.22 %

 Mortgage

 $

(11,504)

-3.23 %

Commercial, Financial

 and Agricultural

 $

1,947 

2.49 %

Installment Loans to Individuals

 $

(1,026)

-2.72 %

Other Loans

 $

1,217 

31.99 %

     Total Loans

 $

2,023 

0.37 %

Total loans at December 31, 2006 were $552 million compared to $550 million at December 31, 2005 and $536 million at December 31, 2004.  Loans for this discussion include loans that are sold in the secondary mortgage market.  Loans to be sold in the secondary mortgage market are separately classified in the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report.  Secondary market mortgages total $3.4 million, $3.0 million, $1.3 million, $2.4 million, and $5.9 million for 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.  See also Notes 4, 5 and 6 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report.  Interest and fees earned on secondary mortgage loans are included in interest and fees on loans as discussed in this report. 

Overall, loan growth in 2006 flattened to less than 1%.  The slowdown is primarily due to flat overall commercial real estate growth in mature markets served by First Citizens.  Construction and permanent financing of one to four family residential loans and developments has been the focus of the bank's marketing program over the past two years with residential loan rates at the lowest point in many years.  Loan growth in 2005 and 2004 was 2.65% and 9.81%, respectively.  Weaker loan growth in 2005 and 2006 can be attributed to the slowing economy and a tightening in consumer credit underwriting standards. 

In spite of economic conditions, overall loan portfolio quality remains high with approximately $431 million or 78 percent of total portfolio volume recorded in real estate loans; $80 million or 14 percent in Commercial and Agricultural loans and $37 million or 7 percent of total portfolio in installment loans to consumers.  Agricultural lines have performed well over the last few years due to positive trends in crop yields and prices.  Volume of agricultural loans is (and is expected to be going forward) negatively impacted, as agricultural producers have been able to reduce their debt levels. 

-19-


Portfolio quality remains strong with the ratio of net charge offs to average net loans outstanding for the years of 2006, 2005, and 2004 at 0.23%, 0.09%, and 0.16%, respectively.  Non performing assets as a percent of total loans plus foreclosed property at current year end represent 0.57% compared to 0.38% and 0.51% at year end 2005 and 2004, respectively.  A very small volume of significant balance loans account for the increase in net charge offs and increase in other real estate owned.  A negative trend in problem credits and charge offs was expected given industry historical trends during rising rate environment.  However, strong credit risk management provides a means for timely identification and assessment of problem credits in order to minimize losses.  Negative trends in problem credits are not expected to increase materially.  The loan loss reserve as a percent of loans is 1.13% slightly below the 1.15-1.25 percent range maintained over the past five years.  Overall, loan demand over the next twelve months is expected to grow approximately 5 percent based on expansion into new markets, expected economic conditions of markets served and growth of the customer base in existing markets. 

Unemployment rates serve as one measurement tool to evaluate the stability and condition of local economies of our markets.  No significant negative trends were noted over the last 12 months or are expected in the near term.  Unemployment rates for year-end 2006, 2005 and 2004 in Tennessee counties served during 2006 are as follows:

2006

2005

2004

Dyer

4.9 %

5.6 %

5.8 %

Fayette

8.4 %

8.6 %

12.0 %

Lauderdale

6.5 %

7.8 %

10.0 %

Obion

5.2 %

5.3 %

5.9 %

Shelby

5.0 %

5.6 %

6.2 %

Tipton

4.9 %

5.3 %

6.5 %

Weakley

5.1 %

5.5 %

5.5 %

Unemployment rates for the state of Tennessee as of the end of each quarter of 2006 were 5.4%, 5.6%, 4.6%, and 4.7%, consecutively.

The following data details the internally classified loans by category as of December 31, 2006 (in thousands):

Category

Total

Internally

Problem Loans %

Outstanding

Classified

of Category

Residential Real Estate

 $

191,832 

 $

4,665 

2.43 %

Home Equity Lines

21,615 

143 

0.66 %

Ag. Real Estate

29,728 

148 

0.50 %

Commercial Real Estate

167,200 

5,179 

3.10 %

Commercial Other

51,845 

423 

0.82 %

Installment Loans

35,463 

170 

0.48 %

Internally classified loans are those loans that have certain characteristics or circumstances that warrant additional monitoring of credit quality and may require specific reserve allocations as determined in accordance with SFAS No. 114.

Real estate loans account for approximately 78% of the total loan portfolio.  Within real estate loans, residential mortgage loans (including residential construction) are the largest category comprising 38% of total loans, which historically have low loan loss experience.  Diversification of the real estate portfolio is a necessary and desirable goal of the real estate loan policy.  In order to achieve and maintain a prudent degree of diversity, given the composition of the market area and the general economic state of the market area, Bancshares will strive to maintain real estate loan portfolio diversification.  The following table lists categories of real estate loans, volume and category type as a percentage of total loans and loan policy limits established for each category:

Actual

Policy

Category

Volume

Percentage

Percentage

Agricultural

 $

29,728 

5.48 %

20.00 %

Land Acquisition Development

   & Commercial Construction

 $

13,383 

2.47 %

10.00 %

Commercial Permanent

 $

145,044 

26.74 %

30.00 %

Residential Construction

 $

48,163 

8.88 %

10.00 %

Residential Mortgage

 $

162,508 

29.96 %

40.00 %

POLICY GUIDELINES

Loan Administration sets policy guidelines approved by the Board of Directors regarding portfolio diversification and underwriting standards. Loan policy also includes board-approved guidelines for collateralization, loans in excess of loan to value (LTV) limits, maximum loan amount, and maximum maturity and amortization period for each loan type.  Policy guidelines for loan to value ratios and maturities related to various collateral are as follows:

Collateral

Max. Amortization

Max LTV

Real Estate

Various (see discussion)

Various (see discussion)

Equipment**

5 Years

75%

Inventory

5 Years

50%

Accounts Receivable

5 Years

75%

Livestock

5 Years

80%

Crops

1 Year

50%

Securities*

10 Years

75%

(Listed)

50%

(Unlisted)

*Maximum LTV on margin stocks (stocks not listed on a national exchange) when proceeds are used to purchase or carry same shall be 50%.

**New farm equipment can be amortized over seven years.

-20-


Bancshares' policy further manages risk in the real estate portfolio by adherence to supervisory limits in regards to loan to value percentages, as designated by the following categories:

Loan Category

 

LTV Limit

Raw Land

65%

Land Development or Farmland

75%

Construction:

 Commercial, Multi-Family, and Other Non-Residential

80%

 1-4 Family Residential

80%

Improved Property

80%

Owner-Occupied 1-4 Family and Home Equity

80%

Home Equity Lines

90%

Non-Owner Occupied 1-4 Family Residential

75%

Multi-family construction loans include loans secured by cooperatives and condominiums. 

On an approved exception basis, loans may be approved in excess of the LTV limits, provided that:

AMORTIZATION SCHEDULES

Loan policy requires every loan to have a documented repayment arrangement.  While reasonable flexibility is necessary to meet credit needs of customers, in general all loans should be repaid within the following time frames:

Loan Category

Amortized Period

Raw Land

10 years

Construction

1 year

Commercial, Multi-family, and Other Non-residential

20 years

1-4 Family Residential

20 years

Improved Property Farmland

20 years

Owner-occupied 1-4 Family and Home Equity

20 years

AVERAGE LOAN YIELDS

The average yield on loans of the subsidiary bank for the years indicated are as follows:

2006 - 7.82%

2005 - 7.05%

2004 - 6.48%

2003 - 7.17%

2002 - 7.93%

The aggregate amount of unused guarantees, commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit was approximately $111 million at year end.  Other information in reference to commitments and standby letter of credits is included in Note 18 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report.

LOAN MATURITIES

Contractual maturities of loans as of December 31, 2006, are as follows:

 

 

 

Due After

 

 

 

Due in One

 

One Year but

 

Due After

 

Year or Less

 

Within Five Years

 

Five Years

Real Estate

 $

152,558 

 $

201,749 

 $

76,187 

Commercial, Financial

 and Agricultural

 $

41,548 

 $

38,433 

 $

5,073 

All Other Loans

 $

10,810 

 $

25,735 

 $

190 

TOTALS

 $

204,916 

 $

265,917 

 $

81,450 

Loans with Maturities After One Year for which:

Interest Rates are Fixed or Predetermined:

 $

170,830 

Interest Rates are Floating or Adjustable:

 $

176,537 

-21-


The degree of interest rate risk to which a bank is subjected can be controlled through a well-defined funds management program.  Bancshares controls interest rate risk by matching assets and liabilities, better explained by employing interest-sensitive funds in assets that are also interest sensitive.  Overall, Bancshares remains in a fairly neutral position in terms of interest rate risk as evidenced by flat net interest margins during a two-year period in which federal funds rates increased 425 basis points.  In 2006, Bancshares became slightly liability sensitive which means that liabilities reprice at a faster rate than assets.  Thus, in a rising rate environment (with a normal yield curve) net interest income would decline, while a flat rate or a lower rate environment would result in improved interest rate margins and net income.  Approximately $205 million or 37% of loans will mature immediately or over the next twelve months, while $266 million or 48% of outstanding loans will mature after one year, but within five years.  Only $81 million or approximately 15% of outstanding loans bear maturities of greater than five years.

NON-PERFORMING LOANS

Non-accrual, Restructured and Past Due Loans and Foreclosed Properties and related ratios as of December 31 for each of the years presented are as follows:

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

Non-accrual Loans

 $

371 

 $

1,524 

 $

1,581 

 $

1,174 

 $

2,216 

Restructured Loans

Foreclosed Property Other Real Estate,

1,815 

129 

337 

535 

1,730 

Other Repossessed Assets

Loans and Leases 90 days past due and still

 Accruing interest

945 

431 

798 

223 

1,701 

Total Non-performing Loans and Other Assets

 $

3,131 

 $

2,084 

 $

2,718 

 $

1,932 

 $

5,647 

Non-Performing Assets as a Percent of Loans and

 Leases Plus Foreclosed Property at End of Year

0.57 %

0.38 %

0.51 %

0.39 %

1.25 %

Allowance as a Percent of:

 Non-Performing Assets

198.37 %

327.74 %

229.54 %

316.97 %

99.21 %

 Gross Loans

1.13 %

1.25 %

1.16 %

1.25 %

1.24 %

 Addition to Reserve as a Percent of Charge-Offs

44.41 %

167.56 %

90.44 %

237.80 %

179.00 %

  Loans and Leases 90 days past due as a Percent of

     Loans and Leases at Year-end

0.24 %

0.36 %

0.44 %

0.04 %

0.37 %

 Recoveries as a Percent of Gross Charge-offs

15.34 %

25.95 %

20.66 %

55.38 %

51.34 %

Non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans, restructured loans, foreclosed properties, and loans and leases 90 days past due and still accruing interest.  Non-performing assets as a percent of total loan portfolio at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $3.1 million or 0.57%, $2.1 million or 0.38%, and $2.7 million or 0.51% of total loans plus foreclosed property, respectively.  Loans and leases 90 days past due and still accruing interest total $945 thousand as of year-end 2006 compared to  $431 thousand as of year-end 2005 and $798 thousand in 2004.  The allowance for loan loss as a percent of non-performing assets was 198%, 328%, and 230%, as of December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.  The allowance as a percent of gross loans for the same time periods was 1.13%, 1.25% and 1.16%.  A very small number of problem credits have negatively impacted the ratios related to non-performing assets as noted in the table above.  The most significant increase is in other real estate and is the result of foreclosure on a residential property with a current estimated fair market value of $1.5 million.  

Categorization of a loan as non-performing is not in itself a reliable indicator of potential loan loss. Policy states that the bank shall not accrue interest or discount on (1) any asset which is maintained on a cash basis because of deterioration in the financial position of the borrower, (2) any asset for which payment-in-full of interest or principal is not expected, or (3) any asset upon which principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more unless it is both well secured and in the process of collection. For purposes of applying the 90 days past due test for the non-accrual of interest discussed above, the date on which an asset reaches non-accrual status is determined by its contractual term.  A debt is well secured if it is secured (1) by collateral in the form of liens or pledges of real or personal property, including securities that have a realizable value sufficient to discharge the debt (including accrued interest) in full, considered to be proceeding in due course either through legal action, including judgment enforcement procedures, or, in appropriate circumstances, through collection efforts not involving legal action which are reasonably expected to result in repayment of the debt or in its restoration to a current status.  Loans that represent a potential loss are adequately reserved for in the allowance for loan losses.

Interest income on loans is recorded on an accrual basis.  The accrual of interest is discontinued on all loans, except consumer loans, which become 90 days past due, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Consumer loans which become past due 90 to 120 days are charged to the allowance for loan losses.  The gross interest income that would have been recorded for the twelve months ending December 31, 2006 if all loans reported as non-accrual had been current in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period is $25,000 compared to $96,000 for the same period in 2005.  Interest income on loans reported as ninety days past due and on interest accrual status was $147,000 for 2006 and $86,000 for 2005.  Loans on which terms have been modified to provide for a reduction of either principal or interest as a result of deterioration in the financial position of the borrower are considered to be "Restructured Loans".  Bancshares has no Restructured Loans for the period being reported. 

Certain loans contained on the Internally Classified Problem Loan List are not included in the listing of non-accrual, past due or restructured loans. Management is confident that, although certain of these loans may pose credit problems, any potential for loss has been provided for by specific allocations to the Loan Loss Reserve Account.  Loan officers are required to develop a "Plan of Action" for each problem loan within their portfolio. Adherence to each established plan is monitored by Loan Administration and re-evaluated at regular intervals for effectiveness.

LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE & RESERVE FOR LOAN LOSSES

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

Average net loans outstanding

 $

557,088 

 $

538,789 

 $

513,678 

 $

411,890 

 $

359,296 

Balance of reserve for loan losses

 at beginning of period

6,830 

6,239 

6,124 

5,653 

4,015 

Loans charged off

(1,538)

(632)

(1,036)

(919)

(1,743)

Recovery of loans previously charged off

236 

164 

214 

509 

895 

   Net loans charged off

(1,302)

(468)

(822)

(410)

(848)

Additions to reserve charged to expense

683 

1,059 

937 

975 

1,518 

Changes incident to mergers

(94)

968 

Balance at end of period

 $

6,211 

 $

6,830 

 $

6,239 

 $

6,124 

 $

5,653 

Ratio of net charge-offs to average net

 loans outstanding

0.23 %

0.09 %

0.16 %

0.08 %

0.20 %

-22-


The preceding table summarizes activity posted to the Loan Loss Reserve Account for the past five years.  The summary includes the average net loans outstanding; changes in the reserve for loan losses arising from loans charged off and recoveries on loans previously charged off; additions to the reserve which have been charged to operating expenses; and the ratio of net loans charged off to average loans outstanding.  Changes to the Reserve Account for the year just ended consisted of (1) loans charged off of $1.5 million, (2) recovery of loans previously charged off $236 thousand, and (3) additions to reserves totaling $683 thousand.  As discussed above, a small volume of loans accounts for the increase in net charge-offs.  The charge-offs are considered isolated incidences and are spread among various markets served by First Citizens.  The charge-offs and increase in non-performing assets do not appear to indicate material negative trends within a specific pool of loans or within a specific market.  Decreased provision for loan losses in 2006 compared to prior years is a result of slower loan growth in 2006 and adequacy of current level of reserves without requiring additional provision during fourth quarter 2006.  Provision for loan losses in excess of net charge-offs in years presented above prior to 2006 is primarily related to additional provision considered necessary in relation to loan growth. 

The following table identifies charge-offs and recoveries by category for the years presented:

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Charge-offs:

 

 Domestic:

 

    Commercial, financial & agricultural

 $

(447)

 $

(139)

 $

(459)

 $

(139)

 $

(188)

    Real estate-construction

(242)

(115)

 

    Real estate-mortgage

(685)

(62)

(138)

(398)

(803)

 

    Installment loans to individuals & credit cards

(406)

(189)

(324)

(382)

(752)

 

        Total charge-offs

 $

(1,538)

 $

(632)

 $

(1,036)

 $

(919)

 $

(1,743)

 

 

Recoveries:

 

 Domestic:

 

    Commercial, financial & agricultural

 $

76 

 $

62 

 $

66 

 $

142 

 $

91 

 

    Real estate-construction

10 

 

    Real estate-mortgage

51 

37 

237 

565 

 

    Installment loans to individuals & credit cards

109 

88 

108 

130 

239 

 

        Total recoveries

 $

236 

 $

164 

 $

214 

 $

509 

 $

895 

 

             Net charge-offs

 $

(1,302)

 $

(468)

 $

(822)

 $

(410)

 $

(848)

 

An analysis of the allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses is made on a fiscal quarter at the end of the month, (February, May, August, and November) and reported to the board at its meeting immediately preceding quarter-end.  The allowance for loan losses is estimated using methods consistent with generally accepted accounting principles as well as regulatory guidance on the allowance.  Such guidance considered specifically includes but is not limited to SFAS 114 and 118 and the Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses issued December 13, 2006. 

The evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance includes the identification of impaired loans and allocation of specific reserves if considered necessary on a case-by-case basis for significant loans.  A loan is impaired when it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due of principal and interest according to the original contractual terms of the loan. Impairment occurs under the following circumstances:  (1) Impairment of a loan shall exist when the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate impede full collection of the contract; and (2) Fair Value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent, indicates unexpected collection of full contract value.  Specific reserve allocations shall be made for loans found to be collateral or interest cash flow deficient.  In addition an allowance shall be determined for pools of loans including all other criticized assets as well as small homogeneous loans managed by delinquency. Impairment decisions are reported to the Board of Directors and in external reports as required by regulations.  Income recognition from impaired loans is determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, as well as financial institution regulatory guidance.

Credit risk management procedures include assessment of loan quality through use of an internal loan rating system.  Each loan is assigned a rating upon origination and the rating may be revised over the life of the loan as circumstances warrant.  The rating system utilizes eight major classification types based on risk of loss. 

Credit risk management process also includes an annual review of minimum of 70% of the gross portfolio less installment loans.  The loan review function is independent of the lending process itself and results of loan review are reported to the Board.  In addition, any single note or series of notes directly or indirectly related to one borrower which equals 25% of the bank's legal lending limit are included in the review.  The results of loan review as well as current portfolio mix by rating are incorporated into the quarterly evaluation of the allowance for loan losses.

Examples of factors taken into consideration during assessment of loan quality for rating purposes, for independent loan review, and for evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses include but are not limited to the following:

Economic conditions, management experience and depth, credit history, business conditions, sources of repayment, debt service coverage ratios, financial condition of borrower(s) and/or guarantor(s), deposit relationship, payment history, collateral values, adherence to loan policy and adherence to loan documentation requirements.

-23-


REPOSSESSED REAL PROPERTY

The book value of repossessed real property was $1.8 million at December 31, 2006 compared to $129 thousand in 2005 and $337 thousand in 2004.  Marketing plans are currently in place for all properties held as of December 31, 2006.  The significant increase from 2005 to 2006 consists primarily of one residential property valued at $1.5 million.  Accounting for adjustments to the value of Other Real Estate when recorded subsequent to foreclosure is accomplished on the basis of an independent appraisal.  The asset is recorded at the lesser of its appraised value or the loan balance.  Any reduction in value is charged to the allowance for possible loan losses.  All other real estate parcels are appraised annually and the carrying value adjusted to reflect the decline, if any, in its realizable value.  Such adjustments are charged directly to expense.

COMPOSITION OF DEPOSITS

The average amount of deposits and rates paid on such deposits are summarized for the three years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Average

 

Average

 

Average

 

Average

 

Average

 

Average

 

Balance

 

Rate

 

Balance

 

Rate

 

Balance

 

Rate

Non-interest bearing demand deposits

 $

90,360 

0.00 %

 $

78,586 

0.00 %

 $

72,272 

0.00 %

Savings deposits

 $

197,115 

1.66 %

 $

190,106 

1.18 %

 $

181,164 

0.71 %

Time deposits

 $

365,839 

4.26 %

 $

331,973 

3.09 %

 $

311,671 

2.36 %

    Total deposits

 $

653,314 

2.88 %

 $

600,665 

2.08 %

 $

565,107 

1.53 %

Market share data for the Tennessee Counties served by First Citizens is included in Item 1 Banking Business of this report.  As noted in Item 1, First Citizens is the market share leader in six of the seven counties it serves with approximately 20% of the market share.  Shelby County is the one market that First Citizens participates in but is not the leader due to the diversity and large number of institutions in that market as well as the length of time that First Citizens has been competing there.   First State Bank, a competitor in markets of First Citizens was second in market share accounting for approximately 18.9% of total deposits.  Bancshares' average deposits for 2006 were $653 million at an average rate of 2.88% compared to $601 million at an average rate of 2.08% in 2005 and $565 million at an average rate of 1.56% in 2004.  The increase in the average cost of deposits is due to the impact of rising rate environment and competitive factors on time deposits.  The current market and competitive environment has resulted in fierce competition in pricing of time deposits in 2005 and 2006.  First Citizens does not compete solely on price as strategies are focused more on customer relationships that attract and retain core deposit customers rather than time deposits.

The success of overall deposit strategies over the past two years resulted in net growth from $592 million at year-end 2004 to $635 million at year-end 2005 to $666 million at year-end 2006.  Core deposits serve as a source of liquidity for Bancshares.  Consistent with strategies to increase core deposits, average deposits balances in the previous table illustrate growth of core deposits in both demand and savings categories.  In the current rate environment, all markets have demanded a competitively priced interest-bearing transaction account.  As a result evidenced in our Statements of Cash Flows, transaction deposit accounts increased approximately $9 million in 2006 and $19 million in 2005.  Over the past three years, core deposits strategies have been focused primarily on two interest-bearing transaction accounts, Wall Street and First Rate accounts.  These two accounts accounted for approximately half of savings deposits for each of the past three years.  First Citizens also continues to offer free checking to attract and retain deposit relationships.  Demand deposits experienced strong growth in excess of 12 percent for each of the past two years. 

Time deposits grew in excess of $20 million for each of the past two years.  Time deposits over $100,000 comprise 51.8% of total time deposits as of year-end 2006 compared to 51.5% at year-end 2005.  Approximately 90% of over $100,000 time deposits will reprice over the next twelve months as a result of established strategies to deal with the current competitive market and rate environment. 

MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF TIME DEPOSITS IN AMOUNTS OF $100,000 AND OVER

Deposits over $100,000 increased $12 million or 7% from 2005 to 2006.  The following table sets forth the maturity distribution of Certificates of Deposit and other time deposits of $100,000 or more outstanding on the books of the bank on December 31, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands). 

2006

 

2005

Amount

 

Percent

 

Amount

 

Percent

Maturing in:

   3 months or less

 $

48,963 

25.55 %

 $

56,725 

31.64 %

   Over 3 through 12 months

124,604 

65.02 %

86,509 

48.25 %

   Over 12 months

18,081 

9.43 %

36,062 

20.11 %

      Total

 $

191,648 

100.00 %

 $

179,296 

100.00 %

OTHER BORROWINGS

In addition to deposits, Bancshares used a combination of short-term and long-term borrowings to supplement its funding needs.  Short-term borrowings consist of a Treasury, Tax & Loan demand note, federal funds purchased and short term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.  The short-term borrowings table below reflects the maximum amount of borrowings at any month end during the respective years.  Short-term borrowings are used to manage fluctuations in liquidity based on seasonality of agricultural production loans and other factors.  The maximum amount of borrowings in any given month during 2006 was significantly less than 2005 and 2004 due to the level of federal funds sold at the beginning of the year as well as slower loan growth during 2006 as compared to the prior two years.  See also the Short Term Borrowings footnote included in the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report. 

The following presents short-term borrowing balances at year end, maximum borrowings at month end during the year and average cost for the periods presented (in thousands):

2006

2005

2004

Amount outstanding-end of period

 $

1,000 

 $

1,000 

 $

1,000 

Maximum amount of borrowings at

 any month end during the year

 $

13,155 

 $

26,217 

 $

25,732 

Year-to-date daily average

 $

4,501 

 $

6,527 

 $

9,656 

Weighted average cost

4.98 %

3.54 %

1.43 %

Long-term debt at the holding company level consists of a revolving line of credit with First Tennessee Bank and trust-preferred debt.  The subsidiary bank's long-term debt consists of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.  In 2006, as a result of slow loan growth, solid deposit growth and inverted yield curve, the Company reduced long-term debt at the subsidiary bank by $17.5 million.  Average volume of FHLB advances for 2006 was $58 million at an average rate of 5.67% compared to $73 million at an average rate of 4.87% in 2005 and $69 million at an average rate of 5.12% in 2004. The average remaining maturity for FHLB long-term borrowings is 5 years.  Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings are comprised of fixed rate positions ranging from 3.99% to 6.55%.  Most of the FHLB borrowings have quarterly call features and maturities range from 2008 to 2011.  If an advance is called, the Company has the option to pay off the advance without penalty or to have the advance reprice at a variable rate tied to the 90-day LIBOR.  Under the current and forecasted rate environments, borrowings with call features in place are not likely to be called and therefore are not included in current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet included in Item 8 of this report.  Debt at Bancshares has variable rates and consists of Correspondent debt and Trust Preferred debt affiliated with a prior acquisition.  Bancshares strategically reduced its debt by approximately $1 million during 2006.   Liquidity management and long term borrowings are discussed within the Liquidity section of this report.       

-24-


The following presents average volumes, rates, maturities, and re-pricing frequencies for long-term debt for the year ended December 31, 2006 (in thousands):

Average

Average

Average

Repricing

Volume

Rate

Maturity

Frequency

FHLB borrowings

 $

58,182 

5.67 %

4 Years

Fixed

Revolving line of credit

2,236 

6.93 %

1 year

Variable

Trust preferred debt

10,310 

7.89 %

26 years

Variable

CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following presents return on equity and assets for the years presented:

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Percentage of Net Income to:

   Average Total Assets

1.10 %

1.10 %

1.08 %

1.09 %

1.27 %

   Average Shareholders Equity

13.88 %

13.71 %

13.56 %

13.88 %

15.05 %

Percentage of Dividends Declared

 to Net Income

46.04 %

47.03 %

50.83 %

50.49 %

48.66 %

Percentage of Average Equity

 to Average Assets

7.93 %

8.01 %

7.95 %

7.91 %

8.43 %

Total Capital (excluding Reserve for Loan Losses) as a percentage of total assets is presented in the following table for years indicated:

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

8.36%

7.80%

7.92%

7.86%

9.25%

Total capital increased 9.19% to $69.5 million in 2006 from $63.6 million at year-end 2005.  Growth in capital during 2006 is from undistributed net income coupled with increases in other comprehensive income from improved fair market values of available-for-sale investments securities.  Adjustments to capital resulting from changes in market value of available-for-sale securities and cash flow hedge, are made quarterly and contributed $1 million to the growth in 2006.  Bancshares has historically maintained capital in excess of minimum levels established by regulation and reflects continuous improvement when comparing previous years.  The risk based capital ratio of 12.5% percent at December 31, 2006 was significantly in excess of the 8 percent mandated by regulation.  This ratio has been maintained in the 10-12 percent range over the past three years.  Total capital as a percentage of total assets was 8.36%, 7.80%, and 7.92% at December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. 

Risk-based capital focuses primarily on broad categories of credit risk and incorporates elements of transfer, interest rate and market risks. The calculation of risk-based capital ratio is accomplished by dividing qualifying capital by weighted risk assets in accordance with financial institution regulatory guidelines.  The minimum risk-based capital ratio is 8.00%.  At least one-half or 4.00% must consist of core capital (Tier 1), and the remaining 4.00% may be in the form of core (Tier 1) or supplemental capital (Tier 2).  Tier 1 capital/core capital consists of common shareholders' equity, qualified perpetual preferred stock and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries.  Tier 2 capital/supplementary capital consists of the allowance for loan and lease losses, perpetual preferred stock, term-subordinated debt, and other debt and stock instruments.

Dividends for 2006 were increased $0.04 to $1.16 per share from $1.12 per share in 2005 and 2004.  Bancshares continues its trend over the last several years with dividend payout ratio and dividend yield in excess of average reported for the Southeast Bank Group as tracked by Mercer Capital.  The dividend payout ratio is 46.04% in 2006 compared to 47.06% in 2005 and 50.83% in 2004.  The projected payout ratio for 2007 is in the range of 45-50 percent.  Dividend payout for Southeast Bank Group for 2006 was 33.33%.  The dividend yield in 2006 is 3.52 percent compared to 3.61 percent in 2005.  The dividend yield for Southeast Bank Group is 2.00% for 2006. 

As of year-end 2006, there are approximately $11.8 million of retained earnings available for the payment of future dividends from First Citizens National Bank to Bancshares.  Banking regulations require certain capital levels to be maintained and may limit dividends paid by the bank to the holding company or by the holding company to shareholders.  These restrictions pose no practical limit on the ability of the bank or bank holding company to pay dividends at historical levels.

Bancshares has repurchased 85,500 shares of its common stock and the treasury stock has weighted average cost basis of $25.64 per share.  Approximately 4,600 treasury shares were repurchased during 2006 at a weighted average cost of $33.66 per share.  Also, approximately 1,700 shares of treasury stock were sold in 2006 at a weighted average price of $34.00 per share.  There are no publicly announced plans or programs to repurchase shares in place during the periods presented or subsequently primarily due to Bancshares current strategy to reduce debt at the holding company level. 

AGGREGATE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Contractual Obligations are due as follows:

Total

< 1 Year

1-3 Years

3-5 Years

> 5 Years

Unfunded Loan Commitments

 $

107,212 

 $

107,212 

 $

 $

 $

Standby Letters of Credit

4,184 

4,184 

Long Term Debt*

59,538 

2,173 

3,134 

42,939 

11,292 

Capital Lease Obligations

Operating Leases

481 

201 

278 

Purchase Obligations

Other Long Term Liabilities

   Total

 $

171,415 

 $

113,770 

 $

3,412 

 $

42,941 

 $

11,292 

                *Long-term debt is presented as principal only excluding interest.

Except for unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit, First Citizens does not materially engage in off balance sheet activities and does not anticipate material changes in volume going forward.

Notes 13 and 18 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report reflect long term obligations and off balance sheet risk.

-25-


ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

LIQUIDITY AND INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY

Liquidity is managed in a manner to ensure the availability of ample funding to satisfy loan demand, fund investment opportunities, and large deposit withdrawals.  Primary funding sources for Bancshares includes customer core deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, as well as correspondent bank and other borrowings.  Customer based sources accounted for 87 percent of funding for the current year versus 84 percent for the prior year.  Borrowed funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank amounted to 6.3 percent ($48 million) of total funding at year-end 2006 compared to 8.7 percent ($65 million) of total funding at year-end 2005.  The Bank had additional borrowing capacity of approximately $16 million with Federal Home Loan Bank at year-end 2006.  The Bank also has lines of credit for federal funds purchases totaling $52.5 million with four correspondent banks.  As of December 31, 2006, First Citizens held $23 million in short term Certificates of Deposit from the State of Tennessee and held $31 million in brokered Certificates of Deposit, representing 4.65% of total deposits.  Brokered time deposits were approximately $22 million and 3.5% of total deposits as of the prior year-end. 

Bancshares' liquidity position is further strengthened by ready access to a diversified base of wholesale borrowings which include lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank, FTN Financial, federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, Brokered certificates of deposit and others.  Bancshares has a line of credit for $13 million earmarked for acquisitions and other financial needs of the holding company with approximately $11.5 million available at year-end 2006.  Bancshares has a crisis contingency liquidity plan to defend against any material downturn in the liquidity position.

When evaluating liquidity, comparison is made between funding needs and the current level of liquidity, plus liquidity that would likely be available from other sources. This comparison provides a means for determining whether funds management practices are adequate. Management should be able to manage unplanned changes in funding sources, as well as react to changes in market conditions that could hinder the bank's ability to quickly liquidate assets with minimal loss.  Funds management practices are designed and implemented to ensure that Bancshares does not maintain liquidity by paying up for funds or by relying unduly on wholesale or credit-sensitive funding sources.  Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has established benchmarks to be used for guidelines in managing liquidity. The following areas are considered liquidity Red Flags:

Liquidity is an ongoing concern of the company's Funds Management Committee, which continues to seek alternative funding sources conducive to net interest margin strategies.  The following table reflects the liquidity position of First Citizens National Bank as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 in comparison to the OCC Liquidity Benchmarks.

OCC Liquidity Benchmark

12/31/2006

 

12/31/2005

Short Term Liabilities/ Total Assets > 20%

20.12%

16.90%

On Hand Liquidity to Total Liabilities < 8%

8.56%

7.98%

Loan to Deposits < 80%

82.91%

86.55%

Wholesale Funds/Total Sources > 15%

14.71%

17.58%

Non Core Funding Dependence > 20%

50.73%

48.06%

The above comparison is one quantitative means of monitoring liquidity levels.  However, other quantitative and qualitative factors are considered in the overall risk management process for liquidity.  Such other factors evaluated by management include but not limited to diversification of funding sources, degree of reliance on short-term volatile funding sources, deposit volume trends and stability of deposits.  There are no known trends or uncertainties that are likely to have a material effect on Bancshares' liquidity or capital resources. There currently exist no recommendations by regulatory authorities, which, if implemented, would have such an effect.  There are no matters of which management is aware that have not been disclosed.

Interest rate sensitivity varies with different types of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.  Overnight federal funds, on which rates change daily, and loans which are tied to the prime rate are much more sensitive than long-term investment securities and fixed rate loans. The shorter-term interest sensitive assets and liabilities are key to measurement of the interest sensitivity gap.  Minimizing this gap is a continual challenge and a primary objective of the asset/liability management program.

-26-


Bancshares exposure to interest rate risk is well within established policy limits as noted in the table below.  The interest rate risk position has shifted from slightly asset sensitive to slight liability sensitive during 2006.  Thus, Bancshares net interest margin could benefit from a slight decrease in rates and could be diluted by further increases in rates over the next 12 months.  Bancshares' fairly neutral position in terms of interest rate risk over the two-year period of interest rate hikes is evidenced by the following comparison of the federal funds rate compared to net yield on average earning assets:

Interest rate risk is separated and analyzed according to the following categories of risk: (1) re-pricing (2) yield curve (3) option risk (4) price risk and (5) basis risk. Trading assets are utilized infrequently and are addressed in the investment policy.  Any unfavorable trends reflected in interest rate margins will cause an immediate adjustment to the bank's gap position or asset/liability management strategies.  The following data schedule reflects a summary of Bancshares' interest rate risk using simulations. The projected 12-month exposure is based on different rate movements (flat, rising, or declining).  In a rising rate cycle, non-maturity deposits will not re-price until a 100 basis point rise takes place.  In a declining rate cycle, non-maturity deposits will re-price with market conditions when deposits hit a floor position. 

Interest Rate Risk
December 2006
(In Thousands)

Tier 1 Capital                              $67,418

Projected 12-Month Exposure

Rate

POLICY

Moves In

Current

Possible

% of Net Int

% of Net Int

Net Interest Income Levels

Basis Pts

 

Position

 

Scenarios

 

Variance

 

Income

 

Income

Declining 2

(200)

 $

27,237 

 $

27,316 

 $

79 

0.3 %

-20.00 %

Declining 1

(100)

27,237 

27,432 

195 

0.7 %

-10.00 %

Most Likely-Base

 

27,237 

 

27,237 

 

-   

 

0.00 %

 

0.00 %

Rising 1

100 

27,237 

26,859 

(378)

-1.4 %

-10.00 %

Rising 2

200 

27,237 

26,278 

(959)

-3.5 %

-25.00 %

Notes: Net interest income as presented in the preceding table assumes that interest rates would change immediately within the total portfolio, a scenario which would reflect a worst case position and is unlikely to happen. 

Bancshares monitors and employs multiple strategies to continuously manage interest rate risk and liquidity at acceptable levels.  Such strategies include but are not limited to use of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, adjustment of re-pricing date of loans, use of interest rate swaps, and investments in mortgage back investments that enables the company to have constant cash inflows.  The following condensed gap report provides an analysis of interest rate sensitivity of earning assets and costing liabilities.

-27-


CONDENSED GAP REPORT
CURRENT BALANCES
DECEMBER 31, 2006

3-12

1-3

3-5

>5

Non

< 3 Mon

Months

Years

Years

Years

Sensitive

Bal

 

Bal

 

Bal

 

Bal

 

Bal

 

Bal

 

Total

Assets:

Total Cash and Due

   From

 $

 $

 $

 $

 $

 $

19,597 

 $

19,597 

Total Investments

7,959 

22,519 

57,792 

42,036 

46,794 

276 

177,376 

Total Fed Funds Sold

12,948 

12,948 

Total Net Loans

222,300 

113,234 

163,322 

53,427 

(6,211)

546,072 

Total Other Assets

75,427 

75,427 

Total Assets

 $

243,207 

 $

135,753 

 $

221,114 

 $

95,463 

 $

46,794 

 $

89,089 

 $

831,420 

Liabilities:

Total Demand

 $

 $

 $

 $

 $

 $

95,048 

 $

95,048 

Total Savings

122,985 

25,942 

27,681 

24,261 

200,869 

Total Time

87,359 

234,332 

39,573 

8,264 

618 

370,146 

Total Deposits

210,344 

234,332 

65,515 

35,945 

24,879 

95,048 

666,063 

Total Borrowings

35,423 

6,437 

10,159 

40,500 

92,519 

Other Liabilities

3,340 

3,340 

Total Other Liabilities

35,423 

6,437 

10,159 

40,500 

3,340 

95,859 

Total Liabilities

245,767 

240,769 

75,674 

76,445 

24,879 

98,388 

761,922 

Total Equity

69,498 

69,498 

Total Liabilities/Equity

 $

245,767 

 $

240,769 

 $

75,674 

 $

76,445 

 $

24,879 

 $

167,886 

 $

831,420 

Period Gap

(2,560)

(105,016)

145,440 

19,018 

21,915 

(78,797)

Cumulative Gap

(2,560)

(107,576)

37,864 

56,882 

78,797 

RSA/RSL

98.96 %

56.38 %

292.19 %

124.88 %

188.09 %

53.07 %

0.00 %

-28-


CONDENSED GAP REPORT
CURRENT BALANCES
DECEMBER 31, 2005

3-12

1-3

3-5

>5

Non

< 3 Mon

Months

Years

Years

Years

Sensitive

Bal

 

Bal

 

Bal

 

Bal

 

Bal

 

Bal

 

Total

Assets:

Total Cash and Due

   From

 $

 $

 $

 $

 $

 $

15,808 

 $

15,808 

Total Investments

9,068 

17,842 

56,580 

38,523 

40,354 

(1,199)

161,168 

Total Fed Funds Sold

24,878 

24,878 

Total Net Loans

228,134 

91,331 

171,713 

58,503 

(6,251)

543,430 

Total Other Assets

70,465 

70,465 

Total Assets

 $

262,080 

 $

109,173 

 $

228,293 

 $

97,026 

 $

40,354 

 $

78,823 

 $

815,749 

Liabilities:

Total Demand

 $

 $

 $

 $

 $

 $

83,970 

 $

83,970 

Total Savings

57,483 

24,834 

24,649 

51,225 

44,828 

203,019 

Total Time

93,365 

164,515 

77,251 

12,990 

399 

348,520 

Total Deposits

150,848 

164,515 

102,085 

37,639 

51,624 

128,798 

635,509 

Total Borrowings

38,013 

6,873 

14,201 

36,294 

18,500