UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2010
[ ] Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 1-13726
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Oklahoma | 73-1395733 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
6100 North Western Avenue
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma |
73118 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(405) 848-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [X] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
As of November 3, 2010, there were 653,915,007 shares of our $0.01 par value common stock outstanding.
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
PART I. |
| |||||
Financial Information |
||||||
Page | ||||||
Item 1. |
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited): |
|||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and |
1 | |||||
3 | ||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended |
4 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Nine Months Ended |
6 | |||||
7 | ||||||
8 | ||||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
41 | ||||
Item 3. |
59 | |||||
Item 4. |
65 | |||||
PART II. |
| |||||
Other Information |
||||||
Item 1. |
66 | |||||
Item 1A. |
66 | |||||
Item 2. |
66 | |||||
Item 3. |
66 | |||||
Item 4. |
66 | |||||
Item 5. |
66 | |||||
Item 6. |
67 |
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
|||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 609 | $ | 307 | ||||
Accounts receivable |
1,454 | 1,325 | ||||||
Short-term derivative instruments |
1,087 | 692 | ||||||
Deferred income tax asset |
| 24 | ||||||
Other |
123 | 98 | ||||||
Total Current Assets |
3,273 | 2,446 | ||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: |
||||||||
Natural gas and oil properties, at cost based on full-cost accounting: |
||||||||
Evaluated natural gas and oil properties |
37,391 | 35,007 | ||||||
Unevaluated properties |
12,706 | 10,005 | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization of natural gas and oil properties |
(25,232 | ) | (24,220 | ) | ||||
Total natural gas and oil properties, at cost based on full-cost accounting |
24,865 | 20,792 | ||||||
Other property and equipment: |
||||||||
Natural gas gathering systems and treating plants |
1,837 | 3,516 | ||||||
Buildings and land |
1,751 | 1,673 | ||||||
Drilling rigs and equipment |
763 | 687 | ||||||
Natural gas compressors |
284 | 325 | ||||||
Other |
649 | 550 | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization of other property and equipment |
(669 | ) | (833 | ) | ||||
Total other property and equipment |
4,615 | 5,918 | ||||||
Total Property and Equipment |
29,480 | 26,710 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS: |
||||||||
Investments |
1,189 | 404 | ||||||
Long-term derivative instruments |
29 | 60 | ||||||
Other assets |
362 | 294 | ||||||
Total Other Assets |
1,580 | 758 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 34,333 | $ | 29,914 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
|||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 1,773 | $ | 957 | ||||
Short-term derivative instruments |
26 | 27 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
1,171 | 920 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
379 | | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
2 | 1 | ||||||
Revenues and royalties due others |
650 | 565 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
122 | 218 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
4,123 | 2,688 | ||||||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Long-term debt, net |
11,445 | 12,295 | ||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
1,839 | 1,059 | ||||||
Long-term derivative instruments |
967 | 787 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
291 | 282 | ||||||
Revenues and royalties due others |
75 | 73 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
320 | 389 | ||||||
Total Long-Term Liabilities |
14,937 | 14,885 | ||||||
CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS (Note 3) |
||||||||
EQUITY: |
||||||||
Chesapeake stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized: |
||||||||
5.75% cumulative convertible non-voting preferred stock, 1,500,000 and 0 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, entitled in liquidation to $1.5 billion and $0 |
1,500 | | ||||||
5.75% cumulative convertible non-voting preferred stock (series A), 1,100,000 and 0 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, entitled in liquidation to $1.1 billion and $0 |
1,100 | | ||||||
4.50% cumulative convertible preferred stock, 2,558,900 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, entitled in liquidation to $256 million |
256 | 256 | ||||||
5.00% cumulative convertible preferred stock (series 2005B), 2,095,615 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, entitled in liquidation to $209 million |
209 | 209 | ||||||
5.00% cumulative convertible preferred stock (series 2005), 0 and 5,000 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, entitled in liquidation to $0 and $1 million |
| 1 | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 655,330,601 and 648,549,165 shares issued at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
7 | 6 | ||||||
Paid-in capital |
12,138 | 12,146 | ||||||
Retained earnings (deficit) |
57 | (1,261 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax of ($16) million and ($62) million, respectively |
25 | 102 | ||||||
Less: treasury stock, at cost; 1,049,382 and 877,205 common shares as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
(19 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||
Total Chesapeake Stockholders Equity |
15,273 | 11,444 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
| 897 | ||||||
Total Equity |
15,273 | 12,341 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
$ | 34,333 | $ | 29,914 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
($ in millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
REVENUES: |
||||||||||||||||
Natural gas and oil sales |
$ | 1,639 | $ | 1,187 | $ | 4,698 | $ | 3,681 | ||||||||
Marketing, gathering and compression sales |
883 | 575 | 2,520 | 1,660 | ||||||||||||
Service operations revenue |
59 | 49 | 173 | 139 | ||||||||||||
Total Revenues |
2,581 | 1,811 | 7,391 | 5,480 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING COSTS: |
||||||||||||||||
Production expenses |
231 | 218 | 652 | 670 | ||||||||||||
Production taxes |
34 | 25 | 119 | 71 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
125 | 95 | 340 | 259 | ||||||||||||
Marketing, gathering and compression expenses |
851 | 546 | 2,429 | 1,569 | ||||||||||||
Service operations expense |
52 | 49 | 154 | 136 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas and oil depreciation, depletion and amortization |
378 | 295 | 1,025 | 1,037 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of other assets |
56 | 62 | 159 | 177 | ||||||||||||
Impairment or loss on sale of other property and equipment |
37 | 124 | 37 | 159 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties |
| | | 9,600 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring costs |
| | | 34 | ||||||||||||
Total Operating Costs |
1,764 | 1,414 | 4,915 | 13,712 | ||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS |
817 | 397 | 2,476 | (8,232 | ) | |||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(3 | ) | (43 | ) | (12 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on redemptions or exchanges of Chesapeake debt |
(59 | ) | (17 | ) | (130 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment of investments |
(16 | ) | | (16 | ) | (162 | ) | |||||||||
Other income (expense) |
168 | (30 | ) | 202 | (25 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Other Income (Expense) |
90 | (90 | ) | 44 | (258 | ) | ||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
907 | 307 | 2,520 | (8,490 | ) | |||||||||||
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT): |
||||||||||||||||
Current income taxes |
(1 | ) | | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
350 | 115 | 966 | (3,185 | ) | |||||||||||
Total Income Tax Expense (Benefit) |
349 | 115 | 970 | (3,184 | ) | |||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
558 | 192 | 1,550 | (5,306 | ) | |||||||||||
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| | | | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CHESAPEAKE |
558 | 192 | 1,550 | (5,306 | ) | |||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(43 | ) | (6 | ) | (68 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO CHESAPEAKE COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
$ | 515 | $ | 186 | $ | 1,482 | $ | (5,324 | ) | |||||||
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.81 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 2.35 | $ | (8.78 | ) | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.75 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 2.24 | $ | (8.78 | ) | |||||||
CASH DIVIDEND DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 0.075 | $ | 0.075 | $ | 0.225 | $ | 0.225 | ||||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING (in millions): |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
632 | 619 | 631 | 606 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
744 | 626 | 692 | 606 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CHESAPEAKE |
$ | 1,550 | $ | (5,306 | ) | |||
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCOME (LOSS) TO CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
1,184 | 1,214 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
966 | (3,185 | ) | |||||
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives |
(45 | ) | 295 | |||||
Realized gains on financing derivatives |
(436 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation |
111 | 104 | ||||||
Accretion of discount on contingent convertible notes |
58 | 60 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on equity investments |
(120 | ) | 32 | |||||
Loss on redemptions or exchanges of Chesapeake debt |
29 | 19 | ||||||
Impairment or loss on sale of other property and equipment |
37 | 159 | ||||||
Impairment of natural gas and oil properties |
| 9,600 | ||||||
Impairment of investments |
16 | 162 | ||||||
Restructuring costs |
| 12 | ||||||
Other |
12 | 8 | ||||||
Change in assets and liabilities |
609 | 10 | ||||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
3,971 | 3,131 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Exploration and development of natural gas and oil properties |
(3,718 | ) | (2,790 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions of natural gas and oil proved and unproved properties |
(4,217 | ) | (1,348 | ) | ||||
Additions to other property and equipment |
(968 | ) | (1,362 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from divestitures of proved and unproved properties |
3,107 | 1,729 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of other assets |
328 | 157 | ||||||
Additions to investments |
(113 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||
Deposits on acquisitions |
(95 | ) | | |||||
Other |
11 | | ||||||
Cash used in investing activities |
(5,665 | ) | (3,654 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds from credit facilities borrowings |
10,458 | 5,563 | ||||||
Payments on credit facilities borrowings |
(9,863 | ) | (7,866 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of offering costs |
2,562 | | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net of offering costs |
1,967 | 1,346 | ||||||
Cash paid to redeem Chesapeake debt |
(3,434 | ) | | |||||
Cash paid for common stock dividends |
(142 | ) | (135 | ) | ||||
Cash paid for preferred stock dividends |
(49 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||
Realized gains on financing derivatives |
436 | 19 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interest in midstream joint venture |
| 588 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale/leaseback of real estate surface assets |
| 145 | ||||||
Proceeds from mortgage of building |
| 54 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in outstanding payments in excess of cash balance |
116 | (305 | ) | |||||
Other |
(55 | ) | (97 | ) | ||||
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
1,996 | (706 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
302 | (1,229 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
307 | 1,749 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 609 | $ | 520 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION OF CASH PAYMENTS FOR: |
||||||||
Interest, net of capitalized interest |
$ | 103 | $ | 111 | ||||
Income taxes, net of refunds received |
$ | (291 | ) | $ | 176 |
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF SIGNIFICANT NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
As of September 30, 2010 and 2009, dividends payable on our common and preferred stock were $90 million and $52 million, respectively.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, natural gas and oil properties were adjusted by $116 million and ($72) million, respectively, as a result of an increase (decrease) in accrued exploration and development costs.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, other property and equipment were adjusted by ($8) million and ($31) million, respectively, as a result of an increase (decrease) in accrued costs.
We recorded non-cash asset reductions to natural gas and oil properties of $2 million and $3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for asset retirement obligations.
We recorded non-cash asset reductions to natural gas gathering systems of $2 million and $3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for asset retirement obligations.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, holders of our 2.25% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2038 exchanged approximately $11 million in aggregate principal amount for an aggregate of 298,500 shares of our common stock in privately negotiated exchanges.
On May 3, 2010, we converted all 5,000 shares of our outstanding 5.00% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (Series 2005) into 20,774 shares of common stock pursuant to the companys mandatory conversion rights.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we issued 24,822,832 shares of common stock, valued at $429 million, for the purchase of proved and unproved properties pursuant to an acquisition shelf registration statement.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, holders of our 2.25% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2038 exchanged approximately $238 million in aggregate principal amount for an aggregate of 6,707,321 shares of our common stock in privately negotiated exchanges.
On June 15, 2009, we converted all 143,768 shares of our outstanding 6.25% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock into 1,239,538 shares of common stock.
On March 31, 2009, we converted all 3,033 shares of our outstanding 4.125% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock into 182,887 shares of common stock.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||
PREFERRED STOCK: |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 466 | $ | 505 | ||||
Issuance of 1,500,000 and 0 shares of 5.75% preferred stock |
1,500 | | ||||||
Issuance of 1,100,000 and 0 shares of 5.75% preferred stock (series A) |
1,100 | | ||||||
Conversion or exchange of 5,000 and 146,801 shares of preferred stock for common stock |
(1 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period |
3,065 | 466 | ||||||
COMMON STOCK: |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
6 | 6 | ||||||
Conversion or exchange of convertible notes and preferred stock for 319,274 and 8,129,746 shares of common stock |
| | ||||||
Issuance of 0 and 24,822,832 shares of common stock for the purchase of proved and unproved properties |
| | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1 | | ||||||
Balance, end of period |
7 | 6 | ||||||
PAID-IN CAPITAL: |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
12,146 | 11,680 | ||||||
Issuance of 0 and 24,822,832 shares of common stock for the purchase of proved and unproved properties |
| 420 | ||||||
Conversion or exchange of convertible notes and preferred stock for 319,274 and 8,129,746 shares of common stock |
9 | 203 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
174 | 143 | ||||||
Offering expenses |
(39 | ) | | |||||
Dividends on common stock |
(95 | ) | (138 | ) | ||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
(44 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
Allocation of joint venture capital to Global Infrastructure Partners |
| (263 | ) | |||||
Tax benefit (reduction in tax benefit) from exercise of stock-based compensation |
(13 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period |
12,138 | 11,981 | ||||||
RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT): |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
(1,261 | ) | 4,569 | |||||
Net income (loss) |
1,550 | (5,306 | ) | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income taxes of $89 million |
(142 | ) | | |||||
Dividends on common stock |
(47 | ) | | |||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
(43 | ) | | |||||
Balance, end of period |
57 | (737 | ) | |||||
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
102 | 267 | ||||||
Hedging activity |
(70 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||
Investment activity |
(7 | ) | 67 | |||||
Balance, end of period |
25 | 274 | ||||||
TREASURY STOCK COMMON: |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
(15 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
Purchase of 179,140 and 115,430 shares for company benefit plans |
(4 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Release of 6,963 and 6,152 shares for company benefit plans |
| | ||||||
Balance, end of period |
(19 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
TOTAL CHESAPEAKE STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
15,273 | 11,978 | ||||||
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST: |
||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
897 | | ||||||
Sale of noncontrolling interest in midstream joint venture |
| 588 | ||||||
Allocation of joint venture capital to Global Infrastructure Partners |
| 263 | ||||||
Deconsolidation of investment in CMP |
(897 | ) | | |||||
Balance, end of period |
| 851 | ||||||
TOTAL EQUITY |
$ | 15,273 | $ | 12,829 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 558 | $ | 192 | $ | 1,550 | $ | (5,306 | ) | |||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative instruments, net of income taxes of $39 million, $38 million, $153 million and $372 million |
65 | 62 | 251 | 609 | ||||||||||||
Reclassification of gain on settled contracts, net of income taxes of ($68) million, ($144) million, ($203) million and ($377) million |
(112 | ) | (236 | ) | (333 | ) | (617 | ) | ||||||||
Ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying for cash flow hedge accounting, net of income taxes of ($2) million, $2 million, $8 million and ($31) million |
(3 | ) | 5 | 12 | (52 | ) | ||||||||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on marketable securities, net of income taxes of $1 million, $4 million, ($4) million and $14 million |
1 | 6 | (7 | ) | 24 | |||||||||||
Reclassification of loss on investments, net of income taxes of $0, $0, $0 and $26 million |
| | | 43 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
509 | 29 | 1,473 | (5,299 | ) | |||||||||||
(Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) available to Chesapeake |
$ | 509 | $ | 29 | $ | 1,473 | $ | (5,299 | ) | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. | Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Chesapeake Energy Corporation and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q as prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Chesapeakes annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (2009 Form 10-K) includes certain definitions and a summary of significant accounting policies and should be read in conjunction with this Form 10-Q. All material adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods have been reflected. The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. This Form 10-Q relates to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 (the Current Quarter and the Current Period, respectively) and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 (the Prior Quarter and the Prior Period, respectively).
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
Effective January 1, 2010, in accordance with new authoritative guidance for variable interest entities, we ceased consolidating our 50/50 midstream joint venture with Global Infrastructure Partners within our financial statements and began to account for the joint venture under the equity method (see Note 9). Adoption of this new guidance resulted in an after-tax cumulative effect charge to retained earnings of $142 million, which is reflected in our condensed consolidated statement of equity for the Current Period. This charge reflects the difference between the carrying value of our initial investment in the joint venture, which was recorded at carryover basis as an entity under common control, and the fair value of our equity in the joint venture as of the formation date.
Critical Accounting Policies
We consider accounting policies related to hedging, natural gas and oil properties and income taxes to be critical policies. These policies are summarized in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2009 Form 10-K.
2. | Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities |
Natural Gas and Oil Derivatives
Our results of operations and operating cash flows are impacted by changes in market prices for natural gas and oil. To mitigate a portion of the exposure to adverse market changes, we have entered into various derivative instruments. These instruments allow us to predict with greater certainty the effective natural gas and oil prices to be received for our hedged production. Although derivatives often fail to achieve 100% effectiveness for accounting purposes, we believe our derivative instruments continue to be highly effective in achieving our risk management objectives. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our natural gas and oil derivative instruments were comprised of the following types of instruments:
| Swaps: Chesapeake receives a fixed price and pays a floating market price to the counterparty for the hedged commodity. |
| Collars: These instruments contain a fixed floor price (put) and ceiling price (call). If the market price exceeds the call strike price or falls below the put strike price, Chesapeake receives the fixed price and pays the market price. If the market price is between the put and the call strike price, no payments are due from either party. Three-way collars include an additional put option in exchange for a more favorable strike price on the collar. This eliminates the counterpartys downside exposure below the second put option. |
| Call options: Chesapeake sells call options in exchange for a premium from the counterparty. At the time of settlement, if the market price exceeds the fixed price of the call option, Chesapeake pays the counterparty such excess and if the market price settles below the fixed price of the call option, no payment is due from either party. |
| Put options: Chesapeake receives a premium from the counterparty in exchange for the sale of a put option. At the time of settlement, if the market price falls below the fixed price of the put option, Chesapeake pays the counterparty such shortfall, and if the market price settles above the fixed price of the put option, no payment is due from either party. |
8
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
| Knockout swaps: Chesapeake receives a fixed price and pays a floating market price. The fixed price received by Chesapeake includes a premium in exchange for the possibility to reduce the counterpartys exposure to zero, in any given month, if the floating market price is lower than certain pre-determined knockout prices. |
| Basis protection swaps: These instruments are arrangements that guarantee a price differential to NYMEX for natural gas from a specified delivery point. For non-Appalachian Basin basis protection swaps, which typically have negative differentials to NYMEX, Chesapeake receives a payment from the counterparty if the price differential is greater than the stated terms of the contract and pays the counterparty if the price differential is less than the stated terms of the contract. For Appalachian Basin basis protection swaps, which typically have positive differentials to NYMEX, Chesapeake receives a payment from the counterparty if the price differential is less than the stated terms of the contract and pays the counterparty if the price differential is greater than the stated terms of the contract. |
All of our derivative instruments are net settled based on the difference between the fixed-price payment and the floating-price payment, resulting in a net amount due to or from the counterparty.
The estimated fair values of our natural gas and oil derivative instruments as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are provided below. The associated carrying values of these instruments are equal to the estimated fair values.
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Volume | Fair Value | Volume | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Natural gas (bbtu): | ($ in millions) | ($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||
Fixed-price swaps |
616,190 | $ | 1,378 | 492,053 | $ | 662 | ||||||||||
Fixed-price collars |
10,980 | 37 | 74,240 | 92 | ||||||||||||
Call options |
1,333,619 | (481 | ) | 996,750 | (541 | ) | ||||||||||
Put options |
(58,580 | ) | (75 | ) | (69,620 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||||
Fixed-price knockout swaps |
28,530 | 5 | 38,370 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Basis protection swaps |
154,502 | (52 | ) | 125,469 | (50 | ) | ||||||||||
Total natural gas |
2,085,241 | 812 | 1,657,262 | 130 | ||||||||||||
Oil (mbbl): |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed-price swaps |
8,044 | (28 | ) | 5,475 | 3 | |||||||||||
Call options |
42,259 | (622 | ) | 14,975 | (144 | ) | ||||||||||
Fixed-price knockout swaps |
3,023 | 35 | 6,572 | 32 | ||||||||||||
Total oil |
53,326 | (615 | ) | 27,022 | (109 | ) | ||||||||||
Total estimated fair value |
$ | 197 | $ | 21 | ||||||||||||
Pursuant to accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging, certain derivatives qualify for designation as cash flow hedges. Following this guidance, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective in offsetting cash flows attributable to the hedged risk, are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings as the physical transactions being hedged occur. Any change in fair value resulting from ineffectiveness is currently recognized in natural gas and oil sales as unrealized gains (losses). Changes in the fair value of non-qualifying derivatives that occur prior to their maturity (i.e., temporary fluctuations in value) are reported currently in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as unrealized gains (losses) within natural gas and oil sales. Realized gains (losses) are included in natural gas and oil sales in the month of related production.
9
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The components of natural gas and oil sales for the Current Quarter, the Prior Quarter, the Current Period and the Prior Period are presented below.
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Natural gas and oil sales |
$ | 1,074 | $ | 785 | $ | 3,243 | $ | 2,280 | ||||||||
Realized gains (losses) on natural gas and oil derivatives |
512 | 687 | 1,484 | 1,802 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on non-qualifying natural gas and oil derivatives |
48 | (278 | ) | (9 | ) | (484 | ) | |||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges |
5 | (7 | ) | (20 | ) | 83 | ||||||||||
Total natural gas and oil sales |
$ | 1,639 | $ | 1,187 | $ | 4,698 | $ | 3,681 | ||||||||
Based upon the market prices at September 30, 2010, we expect to transfer approximately $188 million (net of income taxes) of the gain included in the accumulated other comprehensive income balance to net income (loss) during the next 12 months in the related month of production. All transactions hedged as of September 30, 2010 are expected to mature by December 31, 2022.
We have a multi-counterparty hedge facility with 13 counterparties that have committed to provide approximately 5.6 tcfe of trading capacity and an aggregate mark-to-market capacity of $15.0 billion under the terms of the facility. As of September 30, 2010, we had hedged a total of 2.3 tcfe under the facility. The multi-counterparty facility allows us to enter into cash-settled natural gas and oil price and basis hedges with the counterparties. Our obligations under the multi-counterparty facility are secured by natural gas and oil proved reserves, the value of which must cover the fair value of the transactions outstanding under the facility by at least 1.65 times, and guarantees by certain subsidiaries that also guarantee our corporate revolving bank credit facility and indentures. The counterparties obligations under the facility must be secured by cash or short-term U.S. Treasury instruments to the extent that any mark-to-market amounts they owe to Chesapeake exceed defined thresholds. The maximum volume-based trading capacity under the facility is governed by the expected production of the pledged reserve collateral, and volume-based trading limits are applied separately to price and basis hedges. In addition, there are volume-based sub-limits for natural gas and oil hedges. Chesapeake has significant flexibility with regard to releases and/or substitutions of pledged reserves, provided that certain collateral coverage and other requirements are met. The facility does not have a maturity date. Counterparties to the agreement have the right to cease trading with the company on a prospective basis as long as obligations associated with any existing trades in the facility continue to be satisfied in accordance with the terms of the agreement.
Interest Rate Derivatives
To mitigate our exposure to volatility in interest rates related to our senior notes and bank credit facilities, we enter into interest rate derivatives. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our interest rate derivative instruments were comprised of the following types of instruments:
| Swaps: Chesapeake enters into fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps (we receive a fixed interest rate and pay a floating market rate) to mitigate our exposure to changes in the fair value of our senior notes. We enter into floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps (we receive a floating market rate and pay a fixed interest rate) to manage our interest rate exposure related to our bank credit facilities borrowings. |
| Collars: These instruments contain a fixed floor rate (floor) and a ceiling rate (cap). If the floating rate is above the cap, we have a net receivable from the counterparty and if the floating rate is below the floor, we have a net payable to the counterparty. If the floating rate is between the floor and the cap, there is no payment due from either party. Collars are used to manage our interest rate exposure related to our bank credit facilities borrowings. |
10
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
| Call options: Occasionally we sell call options for a premium when we think it is more likely that the option will expire unexercised. The option allows the counterparty to terminate an open swap on a specific date. |
| Swaptions: Occasionally we sell an option to a counterparty for a premium which allows the counterparty to enter into a swap with us on a specific date. |
The notional amount of debt hedged and the estimated fair value of our interest rate derivatives outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are provided below.
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Notional Amount |
Fair Value |
Notional Amount |
Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate: |
||||||||||||||||
Swaps |
$ | 1,300 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 2,925 | $ | (113 | ) | ||||||
Collars |
| | 250 | (6 | ) | |||||||||||
Call options |
250 | (26 | ) | 250 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Swaptions |
250 | | 500 | (11 | ) | |||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 1,800 | $ | (39 | ) | $ | 3,925 | $ | (132 | ) | ||||||
For interest rate derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges, the fair values of the hedges are recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as assets or liabilities, with corresponding offsetting adjustments to the debts carrying value. Changes in the fair value of non-qualifying derivatives that occur prior to their maturity (i.e., temporary fluctuations in value) are currently reported in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as unrealized gains (losses) within interest expense.
Realized gains or losses from interest rate derivative transactions are reflected as adjustments to interest expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The components of interest expense for the Current Quarter, the Prior Quarter, the Current Period and the Prior Period are presented below.
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense on senior notes |
$ | 167 | $ | 195 | $ | 550 | $ | 572 | ||||||||
Interest expense on credit facilities |
18 | 18 | 42 | 47 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
(185 | ) | (153 | ) | (525 | ) | (467 | ) | ||||||||
Realized (gains) losses on interest rate derivatives |
(2 | ) | (7 | ) | (6 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Unrealized (gains) losses on interest rate derivatives |
2 | (20 | ) | (75 | ) | (106 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of loan discount and other |
3 | 10 | 26 | 25 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
$ | 3 | $ | 43 | $ | 12 | $ | 52 | ||||||||
Our qualifying interest rate swaps are considered 100% effective and therefore no ineffectiveness was recorded for the periods presented above.
Gains and losses related to terminated qualifying interest rate derivative transactions will be amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining term of the related senior notes. Over the next ten years, we will recognize $36 million in gains related to such transactions.
Foreign Currency Derivatives
On December 6, 2006, we issued 600 million of 6.25% Euro-denominated Senior Notes due 2017. Concurrent with the issuance of the euro-denominated senior notes, we entered into a cross currency swap to mitigate our exposure to fluctuations in the euro relative to the dollar over the term of the notes. Under the terms of the cross currency swap, on each semi-annual interest payment date, the counterparties pay Chesapeake 19 million and Chesapeake pays the counterparties $30 million, which yields an annual dollar-equivalent interest rate of 7.491%. Upon maturity of the notes, the counterparties will pay Chesapeake 600 million and Chesapeake will pay the counterparties $800 million. The terms of the cross currency swap were based on the dollar/euro exchange rate on the issuance date of $1.3325 to 1.00. Through the cross currency swap, we have eliminated any potential variability in Chesapeakes expected cash flows related to changes in foreign exchange rates and therefore the swap qualifies as a cash flow hedge. The fair value of the cross currency swap is recorded on the condensed consolidated
11
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
balance sheet as a liability of $35 million at September 30, 2010. The euro-denominated debt in long-term debt has been adjusted to $816 million at September 30, 2010 using an exchange rate of $1.3601 to 1.00.
Additional Disclosures Regarding Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging, to the extent that a legal right of set-off exists, Chesapeake nets the value of its derivative arrangements with the same counterparty in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Derivative instruments reflected as current in the condensed consolidated balance sheets represent the estimated fair value of derivatives scheduled to settle over the next twelve months based on market prices/rates as of the balance sheet date. The derivative settlement amounts are not due until the month in which the related underlying hedged transaction occurs. Cash settlements of our derivative arrangements are generally classified as operating cash flows unless the derivative contains a significant financing element at contract inception, in which case, all cash settlements are classified as financing cash flows in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
The following table sets forth the fair value of each classification of derivative instrument as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, on a gross basis without regard to same-counterparty netting:
Fair Value | ||||||||||
Balance Sheet Location |
September 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||
Asset Derivatives: |
||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Short-term derivative instruments | $ | 438 | $ | 417 | |||||
Commodity contracts |
Long-term derivative instruments | 41 | 36 | |||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
Long-term derivative instruments | | 43 | |||||||
Total |
479 | 496 | ||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Short-term derivative instruments | 794 | 318 | |||||||
Commodity contracts |
Long-term derivative instruments | 367 | 66 | |||||||
Interest rate contracts |
Long-term derivative instruments | 29 | | |||||||
Total |
1,190 | 384 | ||||||||
Liability Derivatives: |
||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Short-term derivative instruments | | (1 | ) | ||||||
Interest rate contracts |
Long-term derivative instruments | | (11 | ) | ||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
Long-term derivative instruments | (35 | ) | | ||||||
Total |
(35 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Short-term derivative instruments | (145 | ) | (42 | ) | |||||
Commodity contracts |
Long-term derivative instruments | (1,298 | ) | (768 | ) | |||||
Interest rate contracts |
Short-term derivative instruments | (26 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||
Interest rate contracts |
Long-term derivative instruments | (42 | ) | (94 | ) | |||||
Total |
(1,511 | ) | (931 | ) | ||||||
Total derivative instruments |
$ | 123 | $ | (63 | ) | |||||
12
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
A consolidated summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the Current Quarter, the Prior Quarter, the Current Period and the Prior Period is provided below, separating fair value, cash flow and non-qualifying derivatives.
The following table presents the gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss) for instruments designated as fair value derivatives:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Derivatives |
Location of Gain (Loss) |
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts |
Interest expense(a) |
$ | 3 | $ | 13 | $ | 16 | $ | 31 | |||||||||
(a) | Interest expense on items hedged during the Current Quarter, the Prior Quarter, the Current Period and the Prior Period was $0, $33 million, $15 million and $66 million, respectively, which is included in interest expense on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
The following table presents the pre-tax gain (loss) recognized in, and reclassified from, accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and recognized in net income (loss), including any hedge ineffectiveness, for derivative instruments designated as cash flow derivatives:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Derivatives |
Location of Gain (Loss) |
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI (Effective Portion) |
||||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
AOCI |
$ | 94 | $ | 107 | $ | 458 | $ | 819 | |||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
AOCI |
5 | 1 | (34 | ) | 79 | ||||||||||||
$ | 99 | $ | 108 | $ | 424 | $ | 898 | |||||||||||
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI (Effective Portion) |
||||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Natural gas and oil sales |
$ | 179 | $ | 381 | $ | 535 | $ | 994 | |||||||||
$ | 179 | $ | 381 | $ | 535 | $ | 994 | |||||||||||
Gain (Loss) Recognized (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)(a) |
||||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Natural gas and oil sales |
$ | 2 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (95 | ) | $ | 83 | |||||||
$ | 2 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (95 | ) | $ | 83 | |||||||||
(a) | In the Current Quarter, the Prior Quarter, the Current Period and the Prior Period, the amount of gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss) represents $5 million, ($7) million, ($20) million and $83 million related to the ineffective portion of our cash flow derivatives and ($3) million, $0, ($75) million and $0, respectively, related to the amount excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. |
The following table presents the gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss) for instruments not qualifying as cash flow or fair value derivatives:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||
Non-Qualifying Derivatives |
Location of Gain (Loss) |
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Natural gas and oil sales |
$ | 384 | $ | 28 | $ | 1,015 | $ | 324 | |||||||||
Interest rate contracts |
Interest expense |
(3 | ) | 14 | 65 | 94 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 381 | $ | 42 | $ | 1,080 | $ | 418 | ||||||||||
13
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Concentration of Credit Risk
A significant portion of our credit risk is concentrated in derivative instruments that enable us to hedge a portion of our exposure to natural gas and oil prices, interest rate volatility and exchange rate exposure. These arrangements expose us to credit risk from our counterparties. To mitigate this risk, we enter into derivative contracts only with investment-grade rated counterparties deemed by management to be competent and competitive market makers, and we attempt to limit our exposure to non-performance by any single counterparty. On September 30, 2010, our derivative instruments were spread among 14 counterparties. Additionally, our multi-counterparty secured hedging facility described previously includes 13 of our counterparties which are required to secure their natural gas and oil hedging obligations in excess of defined thresholds. We use this facility for all of our commodity hedging.
Other financial instruments which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of investments in equity instruments and accounts receivable. Our accounts receivable are primarily from purchasers of natural gas and oil and exploration and production companies which own interests in properties we operate. This industry concentration has the potential to impact our overall exposure to credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that our customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic, industry or other conditions. We monitor the creditworthiness of all our counterparties. We generally require letters of credit for receivables from customers which are judged to have sub-standard credit, unless the credit risk can otherwise be mitigated. During the Current Quarter, the Prior Quarter and the Current Period, we recognized nominal amounts of bad debt expense related to potentially uncollectible receivables. During the Prior Period, we recognized $13 million of bad debt expense related to potentially uncollectible receivables.
3. | Contingencies and Commitments |
Litigation
On February 25, 2009, a putative class action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the company and certain of its officers and directors along with certain underwriters of the companys July 2008 common stock offering. Following the appointment of a lead plaintiff and counsel, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint on September 11, 2009 alleging that the registration statement for the offering contained material misstatements and omissions and seeking damages under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 of an unspecified amount and rescission. The action was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma on October 13, 2009. The defendants motion to dismiss was denied on September 2, 2010. A derivative action was also filed in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma on March 10, 2009 against the companys directors and certain of its officers alleging breaches of fiduciary duties relating to the disclosure matters alleged in the securities case. The derivative action is stayed pursuant to stipulation.
On March 26, 2009, a shareholder filed a petition in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma seeking to compel inspection of company books and records relating to compensation of the companys CEO. On August 20, 2009, the court denied the inspection demand, dismissed the petition and entered judgment in favor of Chesapeake. The shareholder is appealing the courts ruling in the Court of Civil Appeals of the State of Oklahoma.
Three derivative actions were filed in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma on April 28, May 7, and May 20, 2009 against the companys directors alleging breaches of fiduciary duties relating to compensation of the companys CEO and alleged insider trading, among other things, and seeking unspecified damages, equitable relief and disgorgement. These three derivative actions were consolidated and a Consolidated Derivative Shareholder Petition was filed on June 23, 2009. Chesapeake is named as a nominal defendant. Chesapeakes motion to dismiss was granted on February 28, 2010 and plaintiffs were given leave to amend. Plaintiffs chose not to amend and on April 9, 2010, at plaintiffs request, the court entered an order certifying that the February 28, 2010 dismissal was a final, appealable order. Plaintiffs are appealing the dismissal in the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals.
We are currently unable to assess the probability of loss or estimate a range of potential loss associated with the foregoing cases. It is inherently difficult to predict the outcome of any litigation, and these proceedings are at an early stage.
Chesapeake is also involved in various other lawsuits and disputes incidental to its business operations, including commercial disputes, personal injury claims, claims for underpayment of royalties, property damage claims and contract actions. With regard to the latter, various mineral or leasehold owners have filed lawsuits against us seeking specific performance to require us to acquire their oil and natural gas interests and pay acreage bonus payments, damages based on breach of contract and/or, in certain cases, punitive damages based on alleged fraud.
14
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The company has satisfactorily resolved most of these suits but a few are pending, either at the trial court or appellate level. The company believes that it has substantial defenses to the claims made in all these cases.
The company records an associated liability when a loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. Although the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, management is of the opinion that no pending or threatened lawsuit or dispute incidental to its business operations is likely to have a material adverse effect on the companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The final resolution of such matters could exceed amounts accrued, however, and actual results could differ materially from managements estimates.
Environmental Risk
Due to the nature of the natural gas and oil business, Chesapeake and its subsidiaries are exposed to possible environmental risks. Chesapeake has implemented various policies and procedures to avoid environmental contamination and risks from environmental contamination. Chesapeake conducts periodic reviews, on a company-wide basis, to identify changes in our environmental risk profile. These reviews evaluate whether there is a contingent liability, its amount, and the likelihood that the liability will be incurred. The amount of any potential liability is determined by considering, among other matters, incremental direct costs of any likely remediation and the proportionate cost of employees who are expected to devote a significant amount of time directly to any possible remediation effort. We manage our exposure to environmental liabilities on properties to be acquired by identifying existing problems and assessing the potential liability. Depending on the extent of an identified environmental problem, Chesapeake may exclude a property from the acquisition, require the seller to remediate the property to our satisfaction, or agree to assume liability for the remediation of the property. Chesapeake has historically not experienced any significant environmental liability, and is not aware of any potential material environmental issues or claims at September 30, 2010.
Rig Leases
In a series of transactions since 2006, our drilling subsidiaries have sold 85 drilling rigs and related equipment for $704 million and entered into a master lease agreement under which we agreed to lease the rigs from the buyer for initial terms of seven to ten years for lease payments of approximately $97 million annually. The lease obligations are guaranteed by Chesapeake and certain of its subsidiaries. These transactions were recorded as sales and operating leasebacks and any related gain or loss is being amortized to service operations expense over the lease term. Under the rig leases, we can exercise an early purchase option after five and one-half to seven years or on the expiration of the lease term for a purchase price equal to the then fair market value of the rigs. Additionally, we have the option to renew the rig lease for a negotiated renewal term at a periodic lease payment equal to the fair market rental value of the rigs as determined at the time of renewal. Commitments related to rig lease payments are not recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30, 2010, the minimum aggregate undiscounted future rig lease payments were approximately $478 million.
Compressor Leases
Through various transactions since 2007, our compression subsidiary has sold 2,234 compressors, a significant portion of its compressor fleet, for $517 million and entered into a master lease agreement. The term of the agreement varies by buyer ranging from four to ten years for aggregate lease payments of approximately $77 million annually. The lease obligations are guaranteed by Chesapeake and certain of its subsidiaries. These transactions were recorded as sales and operating leasebacks and any related gain or loss is being amortized to marketing, gathering and compression expenses over the lease term. Under the leases, we can exercise an early purchase option or we can purchase the compressors at expiration of the lease for the fair market value at the time. In addition, we have the option to renew the lease for negotiated new terms at the expiration of the lease. Commitments related to compressor lease payments are not recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30, 2010, the minimum aggregate undiscounted future compressor lease payments were approximately $441 million.
15
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Transportation Contracts
Chesapeake has various firm pipeline transportation service agreements with expiration dates ranging from 2010 to 2099. These commitments are not recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Under the terms of these contracts, we are obligated to pay demand charges as set forth in the transporters Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) gas tariff. In exchange, the company receives rights to flow natural gas production through pipelines located in highly competitive markets. The aggregate undiscounted amounts of such required demand payments are presented below:
September 30, 2010 |
||||||||
($ in millions) |
||||||||
2010 |
$ | 82 | ||||||
2011 |
378 | |||||||
2012 |
378 | |||||||
2013 |
364 | |||||||
2014 |
344 | |||||||
2015 2099 |
2,449 | |||||||
Total |
$ | 3,995 | ||||||
Drilling and Rig Purchase Contracts
Currently, Chesapeake has contracts with various drilling contractors to lease approximately 46 rigs with terms of four months to four years. These commitments are not recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30, 2010, the aggregate undiscounted drilling rig commitment was approximately $204 million.
In September 2010, Chesapeake entered into a contract to purchase 7 rigs for $85 million. As of September 30, 2010, we had made a $9 million deposit and have a remaining commitment of $76 million. The transaction is expected to close in December 2010.
Natural Gas and Oil Purchase Obligations
Our marketing segment regularly commits to purchase natural gas from other owners in our properties and such commitments typically are short-term in nature. We have also committed to purchase any natural gas and oil associated with certain volumetric production payment transactions. The purchase commitments are based on market prices at the time of production, and the purchased natural gas and oil is resold.
Minimum Volume Commitments
We are a party to a gas gathering agreement with a subsidiary of Chesapeake Midstream Partners, L.P. (see Note 9), pursuant to which we have committed to deliver specified minimum volumes of natural gas from our Barnett Shale production annually through December 31, 2018 and for the six-month period ending June 30, 2019. At the end of the term or annually, Chesapeake will be invoiced for any shortfalls in such volume commitments at the rate specified in the agreement. Volume commitments remaining as of September 30, 2010 were as follows:
Bcf | ||||
2010 |
129 | |||
2011 |
313 | |||
2012 |
325 | |||
2013 |
338 | |||
2014 |
351 | |||
After 2014 |
1,686 | |||
Total |
3,142 | |||
In addition, Chesapeake has entered into commitments to deliver approximately 530 bcf through September 2021 to third-party midstream companies.
16
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Net Acreage Maintenance Commitments
Under the terms of our joint development agreements with our joint venture partners, Statoil and Total (see Note 8), we are required to extend, renew or replace certain expiring joint leasehold, at our cost, to ensure that the net acreage is maintained in certain designated areas.
Other Commitments
As of September 30, 2010, we had made commitments to acquire additional leasehold in various transactions during the next twelve months for approximately $1.7 billion, including the acquisition of a significant additional position in the Appalachian Basin from privately-held Anschutz Corporation which is expected to close in November 2010.
4. | Net Income Per Share |
Accounting guidance for earnings per share (EPS) requires presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share on the face of the statements of operations for all entities with complex capital structures as well as a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted EPS computations.
For the Current Quarter and the Current Period, no securities were antidilutive in the calculation of diluted EPS. The following securities and associated adjustments to net income comprised of dividends and losses on conversions/exchanges were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS for the Prior Quarter and the Prior Period, as the effect was antidilutive.
Shares | Net Income Adjustments |
|||||||
(in millions) | ($ in millions) | |||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009: |
||||||||
Common stock equivalent of our preferred stock outstanding: |
||||||||
5.00% cumulative convertible preferred stock (series 2005B) |
5 | $ | 3 | |||||
4.50% cumulative convertible preferred stock |
6 | $ | 3 | |||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009: |
||||||||
Common stock equivalent of our preferred stock outstanding: |
||||||||
5.00% cumulative convertible preferred stock (series 2005B) |
5 | $ | 8 | |||||
4.50% cumulative convertible preferred stock |
6 | $ | 9 | |||||
Common stock equivalent of our preferred stock outstanding prior to conversion: |
||||||||
6.25% mandatory convertible preferred stock |
1 | $ | 1 | |||||
Outstanding stock options |
1 | $ | | |||||
Unvested restricted stock |
5 | $ | |
For the Prior Period, as a result of the net loss to Chesapeake common stockholders, there was no difference between basic weighted average shares outstanding, which are used in computing basic EPS, and diluted weighted average shares, which are used in computing EPS assuming dilution.
17
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
A reconciliation of basic EPS and diluted EPS for the Current Quarter, the Prior Quarter and the Current Period is as follows:
Income (Numerator) |
Weighted Average Shares (Denominator) |
Per Share Amount |
||||||||||
(in millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||
Basic EPS |
$ | 515 | 632 | $ | 0.81 | |||||||
Effect of Dilutive Securities: |
||||||||||||
Assumed conversion as of the beginning of the period of preferred shares outstanding during the period: |
||||||||||||
Common shares assumed issued for 5.75% cumulative convertible preferred stock |
21 | 56 | ||||||||||
Common shares assumed issued for 5.75% cumulative convertible preferred stock (series A) |
16 | 40 | ||||||||||
Common shares assumed issued for 5.00% cumulative convertible preferred stock (series 2005B) |
2 | 5 | ||||||||||
Common shares assumed issued for 4.50% cumulative convertible preferred stock |
3 | 6 | ||||||||||
Outstanding stock options |
| 1 | ||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock |
| 4 | ||||||||||
Diluted EPS |
$ | 557 | 744 | $ | 0.75 | |||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009: |
||||||||||||
Basic EPS |
$ | 186 | 619 | $ | 0.30 | |||||||
Effect of Dilutive Securities: |
||||||||||||
Outstanding stock options |
| 1 | ||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock |
| 6 | ||||||||||
Diluted EPS |
$ | 186 | 626 | $ | 0.30 | |||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||
Basic EPS |
$ | 1,482 | 631 | $ | 2.35 | |||||||
Effect of Dilutive Securities: |
||||||||||||
Assumed conversion as of the beginning of the period of preferred shares outstanding during the period: |
||||||||||||
Common shares assumed issued for 5.75% cumulative convertible preferred stock |
28 | 24 | ||||||||||
Common shares assumed issued for 5.75% cumulative convertible preferred stock (series A) |
23 | 20 | ||||||||||
Common shares assumed issued for 5.00% cumulative convertible preferred stock (series 2005B) |
8 | 5 | ||||||||||
Common shares assumed issued for 4.50% cumulative convertible preferred stock |
9 | 6 | ||||||||||
Outstanding stock options |
| 1 | ||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock |
| 5 | ||||||||||
Diluted EPS |
$ | 1,550 | 692 | $ | 2.24 | |||||||
18
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5. | Stockholders Equity, Restricted Stock and Stock Options |
Common Stock
The following is a summary of the changes in our common shares issued for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Shares issued at January 1 |
648,549 | 607,953 | ||||||
Restricted stock issuances (net of forfeitures) |
6,108 | 3,940 | ||||||
Stock option exercises |
354 | 429 | ||||||
Convertible note exchanges |
299 | 6,707 | ||||||
Preferred stock conversions/exchanges |
21 | 1,422 | ||||||
Common stock issued for the purchase of proved and unproved properties |
| 24,823 | ||||||
Shares issued at September 30 |
655,331 | 645,274 | ||||||
In the Current Period, we privately exchanged approximately $11 million in aggregate principal amount of our 2.25% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2038 for an aggregate of 298,500 shares of our common stock valued at approximately $9 million. Through these transactions, we were able to retire this debt for common stock valued at approximately 80% of the face value of the notes. In connection with accounting guidance for debt with conversion and other options, we are required to account for the liability and equity components of our convertible debt instruments separately. Of the $11 million principal amount of convertible notes exchanged in the Current Period, $7 million was allocated to the debt component of the notes and the remaining $4 million was allocated to the equity conversion feature of the notes and was recorded as an adjustment to paid-in-capital. The difference between the debt component and value of the common stock exchanged in these transactions resulted in a $2 million loss (including a nominal amount of deferred charges associated with the exchanges).
In the Prior Period, we privately exchanged approximately $238 million in aggregate principal amount of our 2.25% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2038 for an aggregate of 6,707,321 shares of our common stock valued at approximately $164 million. Through these transactions, we were able to retire this debt for common stock valued at approximately 70% of the face value of the notes. Of the $238 million principal amount of convertible notes exchanged in the Prior Period, $148 million was allocated to the debt component of the notes and the remaining $90 million was allocated to the equity conversion feature of the notes and was recorded as an adjustment to paid-in-capital. The difference between the debt component and value of the common stock exchanged in these transactions resulted in a $19 million loss (including $3 million of deferred charges associated with the exchanges that were written off).
In the Prior Period, pursuant to an acquisition shelf registration statement, we issued 24,822,832 shares of common stock valued at $429 million for the purchase of proved and unproved properties.
19
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Preferred Shares
The following is a summary of the changes in our preferred shares outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
5.75% | 5.75%(A) | 4.50% | 5.00% (2005B) |
5.00% (2005) |
6.25% | 4.125% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
| | 2,559 | 2,096 | 5 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock issuances |
1,500 | 1,100 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of preferred into common stock |
| | | | (5 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
1,500 | 1,100 | 2,559 | 2,096 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
| | 2,559 | 2,096 | 5 | 144 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of preferred into common stock |
| | | | | (144 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
| | 2,559 | 2,096 | 5 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
On May 17, 2010, we issued 600,000 shares of 5.75% Cumulative Convertible Non-Voting Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share and liquidation preference $1,000 per share, in a private placement for net proceeds of approximately $594 million. We also granted an option to such purchasers to place additional shares of the preferred stock. Upon the exercise of the placement option, we issued an additional 900,000 shares of 5.75% Cumulative Convertible Non-Voting Preferred Stock on June 18, 2010 for net proceeds of approximately $877 million.
On May 17, 2010, we issued 1,100,000 shares of 5.75% Cumulative Convertible Non-Voting Preferred Stock (Series A), par value $0.01 per share and liquidation preference $1,000 per share, in a private placement for net proceeds of approximately $1.091 billion.
On May 3, 2010, we converted all 5,000 shares of our outstanding 5.00% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (Series 2005) into 20,774 shares of common stock pursuant to the companys mandatory conversion rights.
On June 15, 2009, we converted all 143,768 shares of our outstanding 6.25% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock into 1,239,538 shares of common stock pursuant to the company's mandatory conversion rights.
On March 31, 2009, we converted all 3,033 shares of our outstanding 4.125% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock into 182,887 shares of common stock pursuant to the companys mandatory conversion rights.
Dividends
Dividends declared on our common stock and preferred stock are reflected as adjustments to retained earnings to the extent a surplus of retained earnings will exist after giving effect to the dividends. To the extent retained earnings are insufficient to fund the distributions, such payments constitute a return of contributed capital rather than earnings and are accounted for as a reduction to paid-in capital.
20
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Stock-Based Compensation
Chesapeakes stock-based compensation programs consist of restricted stock issued to employees and non-employee directors. To the extent compensation cost relates to employees directly involved in natural gas and oil exploration and development activities, such amounts are capitalized to natural gas and oil properties. Amounts not capitalized are recognized as general and administrative expenses, production expenses, marketing, gathering and compression expenses, service operations expense or restructuring costs. We recorded the following stock-based compensation during the Current Quarter, the Prior Quarter, the Current Period and the Prior Period:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Natural gas and oil properties |
$ | 30 | $ | 27 | $ | 95 | $ | 85 | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
21 | 22 | 63 | 60 | ||||||||||||
Production expenses |
9 | 8 | 27 | 26 | ||||||||||||
Marketing, gathering and compression expenses |
5 | 4 | 13 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Service operations expense |
2 | 2 | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring costs |
| | | 9 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 67 | $ | 63 | $ | 205 | $ | 198 | ||||||||
Restricted Stock. Chesapeake regularly issues shares of restricted common stock to employees and to non-employee directors. The fair value of the awards issued is determined based on the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. This value is amortized over the vesting period, which is generally four or five years from the date of grant for employees and three years for non-employee directors.
A summary of the changes in unvested shares of restricted stock for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is presented below:
Number of Unvested Restricted Shares |
Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair Value |
|||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Unvested shares as of January 1, 2010 |
19,225 | $ 31.89 | ||||||
Granted |
8,901 | $ 24.21 | ||||||
Vested |
(5,332 | ) | $ 32.49 | |||||
Forfeited |
(885 | ) | $ 30.49 | |||||
Unvested shares as of September 30, 2010 |
21,909 | $ 28.68 | ||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock vested during the Current Period was approximately $124 million based on the stock price at the time of vesting.
As of September 30, 2010, there was $425 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.4 years.
The vesting of certain restricted stock grants results in state and federal income tax benefits related to the difference between the market price of the common stock at the date of vesting and the date of grant. During the Current Quarter, the Prior Quarter, the Current Period and the Prior Period, we recognized a reduction in tax benefits related to restricted stock of $14 million, $36 million, $15 million and $48 million, respectively, which were recorded as adjustments to additional paid-in capital and deferred income taxes.
Stock Options. We granted stock options prior to 2006 under several stock compensation plans. Outstanding options expire ten years from the date of grant and vested over a four-year period. All stock options outstanding are fully vested and exercisable.
21
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following table provides information related to stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010:
Number of Shares Underlying Options |
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share |
Weighted Average Contract Life in Years |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value(a) |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ($ in millions) | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
2,283 | $ | 8.36 | 2.75 | $ 40 | |||||||||||
Exercised |
(366 | ) | $ | 6.15 | ||||||||||||
Expired |
| $ | | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
1,917 | $ | 8.78 | 2.22 | $ 27 | |||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2010 |
1,917 | $ | 8.78 | 2.22 | $ 27 | |||||||||||
(a) | The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the current market value or the market value upon exercise of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. |
During the Current Quarter, the Prior Quarter, the Current Period and the Prior Period we recognized excess tax benefits related to stock options of $1 million, $1 million, $2 million and $1 million which were recorded as adjustments to additional paid-in capital and deferred income taxes.
6. | Debt |
Our total debt consisted of the following at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
September 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
|||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||
7.5% senior notes due 2013 |
$ | | $ | 364 | ||||
7.625% senior notes due 2013 |
500 | 500 | ||||||
7.0% senior notes due 2014 |
| 300 | ||||||
7.5% senior notes due 2014 |
| 300 | ||||||
6.375% senior notes due 2015 |
| 600 | ||||||
9.5% senior notes due 2015 |
1,425 | 1,425 | ||||||
6.625% senior notes due 2016 |
| 600 | ||||||
6.875% senior notes due 2016 |
| 670 | ||||||
6.25% euro-denominated senior notes due 2017(a) |
816 | 860 | ||||||
6.5% senior notes due 2017 |
1,100 | 1,100 | ||||||
6.25% senior notes due 2018 |
| 600 | ||||||
6.875% senior notes due 2018 |
600 | | ||||||
7.25% senior notes due 2018 |
800 | 800 | ||||||
6.625% senior notes due 2020 |
1,400 | | ||||||
6.875% senior notes due 2020 |
500 | 500 | ||||||
2.75% contingent convertible senior notes due 2035(b) |
451 | 451 | ||||||
2.5% contingent convertible senior notes due 2037(b) |
1,378 | 1,378 | ||||||
2.25% contingent convertible senior notes due 2038(b) |
752 | 763 | ||||||
Corporate revolving bank credit facility |
2,237 | 1,892 | ||||||
Midstream revolving bank credit facility |
250 | | ||||||
Midstream joint venture revolving bank credit facility(c) |
| 44 | ||||||
Discount on senior notes(d) |
(800 | ) | (921 | ) | ||||
Interest rate derivatives(e) |
36 | 69 | ||||||
Total notes payable and long-term debt |
$ | 11,445 | $ | 12,295 | ||||
(a) | The principal amount shown is based on the dollar/euro exchange rate of $1.3601 to 1.00 and $1.4332 to 1.00 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. See Note 2 for information on our related foreign currency derivatives. |
(b) | The holders of our contingent convertible senior notes may require us to repurchase, in cash, all or a portion of their notes at 100% of the principal amount of the notes on any of four dates that are five, ten, fifteen and twenty |
22
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
years before the maturity date. The notes are convertible, at the holders option, prior to maturity under certain circumstances into cash and, if applicable, shares of our common stock using a net share settlement process. One such triggering circumstance is when the price of our common stock exceeds a threshold amount during a specified period in a fiscal quarter. Convertibility based on common stock price is measured quarter by quarter. In the third quarter of 2010, the price of our common stock was below the threshold level for each series of the contingent convertible senior notes during the specified period and, as a result, the holders do not have the option to convert their notes into cash and common stock in the fourth quarter of 2010 under this provision. The notes are also convertible, at the holders option, during specified five-day periods if the trading price of the notes is below certain levels determined by reference to the trading price of our common stock. In general, upon conversion of a contingent convertible senior note, the holder will receive cash equal to the principal amount of the note and common stock for the notes conversion value in excess of such principal amount. We will pay contingent interest on the convertible senior notes after they have been outstanding at least ten years, under certain conditions. We may redeem the convertible senior notes once they have been outstanding for ten years at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount of the notes, payable in cash. The optional repurchase dates, the common stock price conversion threshold amounts and the ending date of the first six-month period contingent interest may be payable for the contingent convertible senior notes are as follows: |
Contingent Convertible Senior Notes |
Repurchase Dates |
Common Stock Price Conversion Thresholds |
Contingent Interest First Payable (if applicable) | |||
2.75% due 2035 |
November 15, 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030 |
$ 48.71 | May 14, 2016 | |||
2.5% due 2037 |
May 15, 2017, 2022, 2027, 2032 |
$ 64.26 | November 14, 2017 | |||
2.25% due 2038 |
December 15, 2018, 2023, 2028, 2033 |
$ 107.36 | June 14, 2019 |
(c) | Effective January 1, 2010, our midstream joint venture was no longer consolidated in accordance with the new authoritative guidance. See Notes 1 and 9 for further details. |
(d) | Included in this discount is $731 million at September 30, 2010 and $794 million at December 31, 2009 associated with the equity component of our contingent convertible senior notes. |
(e) | See Note 2 for discussion related to these instruments. |
Senior Notes
Our senior notes are unsecured senior obligations of Chesapeake and rank equally in right of payment with all of our other existing and future senior indebtedness and rank senior in right of payment to all of our future subordinated indebtedness. Chesapeake is a holding company and owns no operating assets and has no significant operations independent of its subsidiaries. Our senior note obligations are guaranteed by certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries. See Note 12 for condensed consolidating financial information regarding our guarantor and non-guarantor subsidiaries. We may redeem the senior notes, other than the contingent convertible senior notes, at any time at specified make-whole or redemption prices. Our senior notes are governed by indentures containing covenants that limit our ability and our subsidiaries ability to incur certain secured indebtedness; enter into sale/leaseback transactions; and consolidate, merge or transfer assets.
We are required to account for the liability and equity components of our convertible debt instruments separately and to reflect interest expense at the interest rate of similar nonconvertible debt at the time of issuance. These rates for our 2.75% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2035, our 2.5% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2037 and our 2.25% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2038 are 6.86%, 8.0% and 8.0%, respectively.
On June 21, 2010, we redeemed in whole for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $1.366 billion, plus accrued interest, approximately $364 million in principal amount of our outstanding 7.50% Senior Notes due 2013, $300 million in principal amount of our 7.50% Senior Notes due 2014 and approximately $670 million in principal amount of our 6.875% Senior Notes due 2016. Associated with the redemptions, we recognized a loss of $69 million in the Current Period.
On July 22, 2010, we redeemed in whole for a redemption price of approximately $619 million, plus accrued interest, all $600 million in principal amount of our 6.375% Senior Notes due 2015. Associated with the redemption, we recognized a loss of $19 million in the Current Quarter.
On August 3, 2010, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC for the offering from time to time of debt securities.
23
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
On August 17, 2010, we completed a public offering of $2.0 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes for net proceeds of approximately $1.967 billion. The offering consisted of $600 million of 6.875% Senior Notes due 2018 and $1.4 billion of 6.625% Senior Notes due 2020. Both series were priced at par.
On August 30, 2010, we completed tender offers to purchase for cash $245 million of 7.00% Senior Notes due 2014, $567 million of 6.625% Senior Notes due 2016 and $582 million of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2018. On September 16, 2010, we redeemed the remaining $55 million of 7.00% Senior Notes due 2014, $33 million of 6.625% Senior Notes due 2016 and $18 million of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2018 based on the redemption provisions in the indentures. Associated with the tender offers and redemptions, we recognized a loss of $40 million in the Current Quarter.
During the Current Period, holders of our 2.25% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2038 exchanged approximately $11 million in aggregate principal amount for an aggregate of 298,500 shares of our common stock in privately negotiated exchanges. Associated with these exchanges, we recognized a loss of $2 million in the Current Period.
No scheduled principal payments are required under our senior notes until 2013 when $500 million is due.
Bank Credit Facilities
We utilize two bank credit facilities, described below, as sources of liquidity.
Corporate |
Midstream | |||||
($ in millions) | ||||||
Borrowing capacity |
$ 3,500 | $ 300 | ||||
Maturity date |
November 2012 | July 2015 | ||||
Facility structure |
Senior secured revolving | Senior secured revolving | ||||
Amount outstanding as of September 30, 2010 |
$ 2,237 | $ 250 | ||||
Letters of credit outstanding as of September 30, 2010 |
$ 13 | $ |
(a) | Borrowers are Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. and Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. |
(b) | Borrower is Chesapeake Midstream Operating, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Midstream Development, L.P. |
Our credit facilities do not contain material adverse change or adequate assurance covenants. Although the applicable interest rates under our corporate credit facility fluctuate slightly based on our long-term senior unsecured credit ratings, neither of our credit facilities contains provisions which would trigger an acceleration of amounts due under the facilities or a requirement to post additional collateral in the event of a downgrade of our credit ratings.
Corporate Credit Facility
Our $3.5 billion syndicated revolving bank credit facility is used for general corporate purposes. Borrowings under the facility are secured by natural gas and oil proved reserves and bear interest at our option at either (i) the greater of the reference rate of Union Bank, N.A. or the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%, both of which are subject to a margin that varies from 0.00% to 0.75% per annum according to our senior unsecured long-term debt ratings, or (ii) the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), plus a margin that varies from 1.50% to 2.25% per annum according to our senior unsecured long-term debt ratings. The collateral value and borrowing base are determined periodically. The unused portion of the facility is subject to a commitment fee of 0.50%. Interest is payable quarterly or, if LIBOR applies, it may be payable at more frequent intervals.
The credit facility agreement contains various covenants and restrictive provisions which limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments or loans and create liens and require us to maintain an indebtedness to total capitalization ratio and an indebtedness to EBITDA ratio, in each case as defined in the agreement. We were in compliance with all covenants under the agreement at September 30, 2010. If we should fail to perform our obligations under these and other covenants, the revolving credit commitment could be terminated and any outstanding borrowings under the facility could be declared immediately due and payable. Such acceleration, if involving a principal amount of $50 million or more, would constitute an event of default under our senior note indentures, which could in turn result in the acceleration of a significant portion of our senior note indebtedness. The
24
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
credit facility agreement also has cross default provisions that apply to other indebtedness of Chesapeake and its restricted subsidiaries with an outstanding principal amount in excess of $75 million.
The facility is fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by Chesapeake and certain of our other wholly owned subsidiaries.
Midstream Credit Facility
Our $300 million midstream syndicated revolving bank credit facility is used to fund capital expenditures to build natural gas gathering and other systems for our drilling program and for general corporate purposes associated with our midstream operations. Borrowings under the midstream credit facility are secured by all of the assets of the wholly owned subsidiaries (the restricted subsidiaries) of Chesapeake Midstream Development, L.P. (CMD), itself a wholly owned subsidiary of Chesapeake, and bear interest at our option at either (i) the greater of the reference rate of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%, and the one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%, all of which are subject to a margin that varies from 1.75% to 2.25% per annum according to the most recent leverage ratio described below or (ii) the LIBOR plus a margin that varies from 2.75% to 3.25% per annum according to the most recent leverage ratio. The unused portion of the facility is subject to a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum according to the most recent leverage ratio. Interest is payable quarterly or, if LIBOR applies, it may be payable at more frequent intervals.
The midstream credit facility agreement contains various covenants and restrictive provisions which limit the ability of CMD and its restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, make investments or loans and create liens. The agreement requires maintenance of a leverage ratio based on the ratio of indebtedness to EBITDA and an interest coverage ratio based on the ratio of EBITDA to interest expense, in each case as defined in the agreement. The leverage ratio increases during any three-quarter period, beginning in the quarter in which CMD makes a material disposition of assets to our master limited partnership midstream affiliate, Chesapeake Midstream Partners, L.P. We were in compliance with all covenants under the agreement at September 30, 2010. If CMD or its restricted subsidiaries should fail to perform their obligations under these and other covenants, the revolving credit commitment could be terminated and any outstanding borrowings under the facility could be declared immediately due and payable. The midstream credit facility agreement also has cross default provisions that apply to other indebtedness CMD and its restricted subsidiaries may have with an outstanding principal amount in excess of $15 million.
Other Financings
In 2009, we financed 113 real estate surface assets in the Barnett Shale area for approximately $145 million and entered into a 40-year master lease agreement under which we agreed to lease the sites for approximately $15 million to $27 million annually. This lease transaction was recorded as a financing lease and the cash received was recorded with an offsetting long-term liability on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Chesapeake exercised its option to repurchase two of the assets in the Current Period. As of September 30, 2010, 111 assets were leased and the minimum aggregate undiscounted future lease payments were approximately $832 million.
In 2009, we financed our regional Barnett Shale headquarters building in Fort Worth, Texas for net proceeds of approximately $54 million with a five-year term loan which has a floating rate of prime plus 275 basis points. At our option, we may prepay in full without penalty beginning in year four. The payment obligation is guaranteed by Chesapeake.
25
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. | Segment Information |
In accordance with accounting guidance for disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information, we have two reportable operating segments. Our exploration and production operational segment and natural gas and oil midstream segment are managed separately because of the nature of their products and services. The exploration and production segment is responsible for finding and producing natural gas and oil. The midstream segment is responsible for marketing, gathering and compression of natural gas and oil primarily from Chesapeake-operated wells. We also have drilling rig and trucking operations which are responsible for providing drilling rigs primarily used on Chesapeake-operated wells and trucking services utilized in the transportation of drilling rigs on both Chesapeake-operated wells and wells operated by third parties. Our drilling rig and trucking service operations are presented in Other Operations in the table below.
Management evaluates the performance of our segments based upon income (loss) before income taxes. Revenues from the midstream segments sale of natural gas and oil related to Chesapeakes ownership interests are reflected as exploration and production revenues. Such amounts totaled $1.045 billion, $716 million, $2.978 billion and $2.009 billion for the Current Quarter, the Prior Quarter, the Current Period and the Prior Period. The following table presents selected financial information for Chesapeakes operating segments.
Exploration and Production |
Midstream | Other Operations |
Intercompany
Eliminations |
Consolidated Total |
||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 1,639 | $ | 1,928 | $ | 187 | $ | (1,173 | ) | $ | 2,581 | |||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
| (1,045 | ) | (128 | ) | 1,173 | | |||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 1,639 | $ | 883 | $ | 59 | $ | | $ | 2,581 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | 822 | $ | 96 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 907 | ||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 1,187 | $ | 1,291 | $ | 69 | $ | (736 | ) | $ | 1,811 | |||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
| (716 | ) | (20 | ) | 736 | | |||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 1,187 | $ | 575 | $ | 49 | $ | | $ | 1,811 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | 431 | $ | (111 | ) | $ | (19 | ) | $ | 6 | $ | 307 | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 4,698 | $ | 5,498 | $ | 538 | $ | (3,343 | ) | $ | 7,391 | |||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
| (2,978 | ) | (365 | ) | 3,343 | | |||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 4,698 | $ | 2,520 | $ | 173 | $ | | $ | 7,391 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | 2,401 | $ | 152 | $ | (32 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 2,520 | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 3,681 | $ | 3,669 | $ | 338 | $ | (2,208 | ) | $ | 5,480 | |||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
| (2,009 | ) | (199 | ) | 2,208 | | |||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 3,681 | $ | 1,660 | $ | 139 | $ | | $ | 5,480 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | (8,354 | ) | $ | (82 | ) | $ | (53 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (8,490 | ) | |||||
As of September 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 30,945 | $ | 3,481 | $ | 721 | $ | (814 | ) | $ | 34,333 | |||||||||
As of December 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 25,637 | $ | 4,323 | $ | 660 | $ | (706 | ) | $ | 29,914 |
26
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
8. | Divestitures |
Joint Ventures
In January 2010, Chesapeake and Total E&P USA, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Total S.A., closed a $2.25 billion Barnett Shale joint venture transaction, whereby Total acquired a 25% interest in our upstream Barnett Shale assets. Total paid us approximately $800 million in cash at closing (plus $78 million of drilling and completion carries due from the effective date of the transaction to the closing date) and is obligated to pay a total of $1.45 billion over time by funding 60% of our share of future drilling and completion expenditures. We expect this drilling carry to be fully utilized by year-end 2013.
During the Current Period and Prior Period, our drilling and completion costs included the benefit of approximately $745 million and $959 million, respectively, in drilling and completion carries associated with our shale play joint ventures with Total, Statoil, BP America and Plains Exploration & Production Company as follows:
Shale Play |
Joint Venture Partner |
Joint Venture Date |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||
Barnett |
Total | January 2010 | $ | 349 | $ | | ||||||
Marcellus |
Statoil | November 2008 | 396 | 85 | ||||||||
Fayetteville |
BP | September 2008 | | 524 | ||||||||
Haynesville |
Plains | July 2008 | | 350 | ||||||||
$ | 745 | $ | 959 | |||||||||
During the Current Period, as part of our joint venture agreements with Total, Statoil and Plains, we sold interests in additional leasehold in the Barnett, Marcellus and Haynesville shale plays for approximately $395 million.
For accounting purposes, cash proceeds from these joint venture transactions were reflected as a reduction of natural gas and oil properties with no gain or loss recognized.
Volumetric Production Payments
On February 5, 2010, we sold certain Chesapeake-operated long-lived producing assets in East Texas and the Texas Gulf Coast in our sixth volumetric production payment (VPP) transaction for net proceeds of approximately $180 million, or $3.95 per mcfe.
On June 14, 2010, we sold certain Chesapeake-operated long-lived producing assets in the Permian Basin in our seventh VPP transaction for proceeds of approximately $335 million, or $8.73 per mcfe.
On September 30, 2010, we sold certain Chesapeake-operated long-lived producing assets in the Barnett Shale in our eighth VPP transaction for proceeds of approximately $1.15 billion, or $2.93 per mcfe.
For accounting purposes, cash proceeds from these transactions were reflected as a reduction of natural gas and oil properties with no gain or loss recognized, and our proved reserves were reduced accordingly.
Other Divestitures
In the Current Period, we sold producing properties and gathering systems in Virginia and in the Permian Basin for proceeds of approximately $330 million.
27
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
9. | Investments |
At September 30, 2010, investments accounted for under the equity method totaled $1.160 billion and investments accounted for under the cost method totaled $29 million. Following is a summary of our investments:
Carrying Value | ||||||||||||||||
Approximate % Owned |
Accounting Method |
September 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
|||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Chesapeake Midstream Partners, L.P. |
42% | Equity | $ | 666 | $ | | ||||||||||
Frac Tech Services, LLC |
26% | Equity | 347 | 239 | ||||||||||||
Chaparral Energy, Inc. |
20% | Equity | 137 | 103 | ||||||||||||
Gastar Exploration Ltd. |
14% | Cost | 27 | 32 | ||||||||||||
Other(a) |
| Cost/Equity | 12 | 30 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,189 | $ | 404 | |||||||||||||
(a) | In the Current Quarter, we recorded a $16 million impairment of certain other equity investments. |
Chesapeake Midstream Partners, L.P. On September 30, 2009, we formed a joint venture with Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP), a New York-based private equity fund, to own and operate natural gas midstream assets. As part of the transaction, Chesapeake contributed certain natural gas gathering and processing assets to, and GIP purchased a 50% interest in, a new joint venture entity. The assets we contributed to the joint venture were substantially all of our midstream assets in the Barnett Shale and also the majority of our non-shale midstream assets in the Arkoma, Anadarko, Delaware and Permian Basins. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the joint venture was consolidated within our financial statements. Effective January 1, 2010, in accordance with new authoritative guidance for variable interest entities, we changed the accounting for our investment in the joint venture to the equity method. Adoption of this new guidance resulted in an after-tax cumulative effect charge to retained earnings of $142 million, which is reflected in our condensed consolidated statement of equity for the Current Period. This charge reflects the difference between the carrying value of our initial investment in the joint venture, which was recorded at carryover basis as an entity under common control, and the fair value of our equity in the joint venture as of the formation date. In May 2010, we received a $75 million cash distribution from the joint venture. The carrying value of our investment in the joint venture is less than our underlying equity in net assets by approximately $240 million as of September 30, 2010. This difference is being accreted over 20 years.
On August 3, 2010, Chesapeake Midstream Partners, L.P. (NYSE: CHKM), which we and GIP formed to own, operate, develop and acquire midstream assets, completed an initial public offering of 24,437,500 common units (including 3,187,500 common units issued pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option on August 3, 2010) representing limited partner interests and received gross offering proceeds of approximately $513 million at an initial offering price of $21.00 per unit less approximately $38 million for underwriting discounts and commissions, structuring fees and offering expenses. Pursuant to the terms of our contribution agreement with GIP, CHKM distributed the approximate $62 million of net proceeds from the exercise of the over-allotment option to GIP on August 3, 2010. In connection with the closing of the offering, Chesapeake and GIP contributed the interests of the midstream joint venture's operating subsidiary to CHKM, and CHKM is continuing the business that had been conducted by the joint venture. Common units owned by public security holders represent 17.7% of all outstanding limited partner interests, and Chesapeake and GIP hold 42.3% and 40.0%, respectively, of all outstanding limited partner interests. The limited partners, collectively, have a 98.0% interest in CHKM and the general partner, which is owned and controlled 50/50 by Chesapeake and GIP, has a 2.0% interest in CHKM.
As a result of the initial public offering by CHKM, we recognized a $90 million gain on our investment in the Current Quarter. This gain represented our proportionate share of the excess of offering proceeds over the carrying value of our investment in CHKM.
Frac Tech Services, LLC. The carrying value of our investment in Frac Tech is in excess of our underlying equity in net assets by approximately $190 million as of September 30, 2010. This excess amount is attributed to certain intangibles associated with the specialty services provided by Frac Tech and is being amortized over the estimated life of the intangibles.
Chaparral Energy, Inc. The carrying value of our investment in Chaparral is in excess of our underlying equity in net assets by approximately $61 million as of September 30, 2010. This excess is attributed to the natural gas and oil reserves held by Chaparral and is being amortized over the estimated life of these reserves based on a unit of production rate.
28
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
As a result of an additional equity offering by Chaparral to a third party, we recognized a $31 million gain on our investment in the Current Quarter. This gain represented our proportionate share of the excess of offering proceeds over the carrying value of our investment in Chaparral.
10. | Restructuring |
In the Prior Period, we restructured our Charleston, West Virginia-based Eastern Division from a regional corporate headquarters to a regional field office consistent with the business model the company uses elsewhere in the country. As a result, we consolidated the management of our Eastern Division land, legal, accounting, information technology, geoscience and engineering departments into our corporate offices in Oklahoma City. The costs of the reorganization include termination benefits, consolidating or closing facilities and relocating employees. In addition, we had certain other workforce reductions that resulted in termination benefits. A summary of Chesapeakes restructuring cost is presented below:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
($ in millions) |
Termination and relocation costs |
$ | 22 | ||||||
Acceleration of restricted stock awards |
9 | |||||||
Other associated costs |
3 | |||||||
Total Restructuring Costs |
$ | 34 | ||||||
11. | Fair Value Measurements |
Certain financial instruments are reported at fair value on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Under fair value measurement accounting guidance, fair value is defined as the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid for the transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants, i.e., an exit price. To estimate an exit price, a three-level hierarchy is used. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs, which refer broadly to assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability, into three levels. Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and have the highest priority. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the financial asset or liability and have the lowest priority. Chesapeake uses a market valuation approach based on available inputs and the following methods and assumptions to measure the fair values of its assets and liabilities, which may or may not be observable in the market.
Cash Equivalents. The fair value of cash equivalents is based on quoted market prices.
Investments. The fair value of Chesapeakes investment in Gastar Exploration Ltd. (NYSE Amex: GST) common stock is based on a quoted market price.
Other Long-Term Assets and Liabilities. The fair value of other long-term assets and liabilities, consisting of obligations under our Deferred Compensation Plan, is based on quoted market prices.
Derivatives. The fair values of our commodity derivatives are based on a third-party pricing model which utilizes inputs that are either readily available in the public market, such as natural gas and oil forward curves and discount rates, or can be corroborated from active markets or broker quotes. These values are then compared to the values given by our counterparties for reasonableness. Since the commodity swaps do not have options and therefore no unobservable inputs, they are classified as Level 2. All other commodity derivatives have some level of unobservable input, such as volatility curves, and are therefore classified as Level 3. For interest rate and foreign currency derivatives, we use the fair value estimates provided by our respective counterparties, which are classified as Level 3 inputs. These values are reviewed internally for reasonableness using future interest rate curves and time to maturity. Derivatives are also subject to the risk that counterparties will be unable to meet their obligations. We factor in non-performance risk in the valuation of our derivatives using current published credit default swap rates. To date this has not had a material impact on the values of our derivatives.
Debt. The fair value of certain of our long-term debt is based on the face amount of that debt along with the value of related interest rate swaps.
29
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following table provides fair value measurement information for financial assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010:
Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Total Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets (Liabilities): |
||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents |
$ | 609 | $ | | $ | | $ | 609 | ||||||||
Investments |
27 | | | 27 | ||||||||||||
Other long-term assets |
42 | | | 42 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
| | (816 | ) | (816 | ) | ||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
(42 | ) | | | (42 | ) | ||||||||||
Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity assets |
| 1,387 | 255 | 1,642 | ||||||||||||
Commodity liabilities |
| | (1,445 | ) | (1,445 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest rate assets |
| | 29 | 29 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate liabilities |
| | (68 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||||||||
Foreign currency liabilities |
| | (35 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||||||
Total derivatives |
| 1,387 | (1,264 | ) | 123 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 636 | $ | 1,387 | $ | (2,080 | ) | $ | (57 | ) | ||||||
The following table provides fair value measurement information for financial assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009:
Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Total Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets (Liabilities): |
||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents |
$ | 307 | $ | | $ | | $ | 307 | ||||||||
Investments |
32 | | | 32 | ||||||||||||
Other long-term assets |
34 | | | 34 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
| | (1,398 | ) | (1,398 | ) | ||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
(34 | ) | | | (34 | ) | ||||||||||
Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity assets |
| 693 | 143 | 836 | ||||||||||||
Commodity liabilities |
| (1 | ) | (809 | ) | (810 | ) | |||||||||
Interest rate liabilities |
| | (132 | ) | (132 | ) | ||||||||||
Foreign currency assets |
| | 43 | 43 | ||||||||||||
Total derivatives |
| 692 | (755 | ) | (63 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 339 | $ | 692 | $ | (2,153 | ) | $ | (1,122 | ) | ||||||
30
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
A summary of the changes in Chesapeakes assets (liabilities) classified as Level 3 measurements during the Current Period and the Prior Period is presented below:
Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||
Commodity | Interest
Rate |
Foreign Currency |
Debt | |||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance of Level 3 as of January 1, 2010 |
$ | (666 | ) | $ | (132 | ) | $ | 43 | $ | (1,398 | ) | |||||
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings (realized)(a) |
305 | (6 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Included in earnings or change in net assets (unrealized)(a) |
(669 | ) | 85 | (44 | ) | 32 | ||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
(18 | ) | | (34 | ) | | ||||||||||
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
(142 | ) | 14 | | 550 | (b) | ||||||||||
Transfers in and out of Level 3 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Balance of Level 3 as of September 30, 2010 |
$ | (1,190 | ) | $ | (39 | ) | $ | (35 | ) | $ | (816 | ) | ||||
Balance of Level 3 as of January 1, 2009 |
$ | 431 | $ | (63 | ) | $ | (76 | ) | $ | (1,470 | ) | |||||
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings (realized)(a) |
778 | 20 | | (128 | ) | |||||||||||
Included in earnings or change in net assets (unrealized)(a) |
(380 | ) | 106 | 42 | | |||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
45 | | 78 | | ||||||||||||
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
(835 | ) | (154 | ) | | (450 | )(b) | |||||||||
Transfers in and out of Level 3 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Balance of Level 3 as of September 30, 2009 |
$ | 39 | $ | (91 | ) | $ | 44 | $ | (2,048 | ) | ||||||
(a) | Amounts related to commodity derivatives are included in Natural Gas and Oil Sales, and amounts related to interest rate and foreign currency derivatives and debt are included in Interest Expense. |
(b) | Amount represents a(n) (increase)/decrease in debt recorded at fair value as a result of new or terminated interest rate swaps. |
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with accounting guidance for financial instruments. We have determined the estimated fair values by using available market information and valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions or valuation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The carrying values of financial instruments comprising current assets and current liabilities approximate fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. We estimate the fair value of our long-term debt and our convertible preferred stock primarily using quoted market prices. Fair value is compared to the carrying value, excluding the impact of interest rate derivatives, in the table below.
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying
Amount |
Estimated
Fair Value |
Carrying
Amount |
Estimated
Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 11,409 | $ | 12,295 | $ | 12,226 | $ | 12,824 | ||||||||
Convertible preferred stock |
$ | 3,065 | $ | 2,994 | $ | 466 | $ | 401 |
31
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
12. | Condensed Consolidating Financial Information |
Chesapeake Energy Corporation is a holding company and owns no operating assets and has no significant operations independent of its subsidiaries. Our obligations under our outstanding senior notes and contingent convertible notes listed in Note 6 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries on a senior unsecured basis. Our midstream subsidiary, CMD, is not a guarantor and is subject to covenants in the midstream revolving credit facility referred to in Note 6 that restricts it from paying dividends or distributions or making loans to Chesapeake.
Set forth below are condensed consolidating financial statements for Chesapeake Energy Corporation (parent) on a stand-alone, unconsolidated basis, and its combined guarantor and combined non-guarantor subsidiaries as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The financial information may not necessarily be indicative of results of operations, cash flows or financial position had the subsidiaries operated as independent entities.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
Parent | Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | 587 | $ | 22 | $ | | $ | 609 | ||||||||||
Other |
3 | 2,549 | 139 | (27 | ) | 2,664 | ||||||||||||||
Total Current Assets |
3 | 3,136 | 161 | (27 | ) | 3,273 | ||||||||||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas and oil properties, at cost based on full-cost accounting |
| 24,649 | 216 | | 24,865 | |||||||||||||||
Other property and equipment, net |
| 3,029 | 1,586 | | 4,615 | |||||||||||||||
Total Property and Equipment |
| 27,678 | 1,802 | | 29,480 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
193 | 715 | 672 | | 1,580 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in subsidiaries and intercompany advance |
1,356 | 121 | | (1,477 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 1,552 | $ | 31,650 | $ | 2,635 | $ | (1,504 | ) | $ | 34,333 | |||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
$ | 226 | $ | 3,816 | $ | 110 | $ | (29 | ) | $ | 4,123 | |||||||||
Intercompany payable (receivable) from parent |
(23,340 | ) | 21,214 | 2,145 | (19 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
(23,114 | ) | 25,030 | 2,255 | (48 | ) | 4,123 | |||||||||||||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, net |
8,958 | 2,237 | 250 | | 11,445 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
392 | 1,418 | 8 | 21 | 1,839 | |||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
43 | 1,609 | 1 | | 1,653 | |||||||||||||||
Total Long-Term Liabilities |
9,393 | 5,264 | 259 | 21 | 14,937 | |||||||||||||||
EQUITY: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Chesapeake stockholders equity |
15,273 | 1,356 | 121 | (1,477 | ) | 15,273 | ||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total Equity |
15,273 | 1,356 | 121 | (1,477 | ) | 15,273 | ||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
$ | 1,552 | $ | 31,650 | $ | 2,635 | $ | (1,504 | ) | $ | 34,333 | |||||||||
32
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009
Parent | Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | 293 | $ | 14 | $ | | $ | 307 | ||||||||||
Other |
27 | 2,031 | 166 | (85 | ) | 2,139 | ||||||||||||||
Total Current Assets |
27 | 2,324 | 180 | (85 | ) | 2,446 | ||||||||||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas and oil properties, at cost based on full-cost accounting |
| 20,788 | 4 | | 20,792 | |||||||||||||||
Other property and equipment, net |
| 2,903 | 3,015 | | 5,918 | |||||||||||||||
Total Property and Equipment |
| 23,691 | 3,019 | | 26,710 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
197 | 540 | 21 | | 758 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in subsidiaries and intercompany advance |
3,029 | 222 | | (3,251 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 3,253 | $ | 26,777 | $ | 3,220 | $ | (3,336 | ) | $ | 29,914 | |||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
$ | 277 | $ | 2,261 | $ | 235 | $ | (85 | ) | $ | 2,688 | |||||||||
Intercompany payable (receivable) from parent |
(19,388 | ) | 17,508 | 1,793 | 87 | | ||||||||||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
(19,111 | ) | 19,769 | 2,028 | 2 | 2,688 | ||||||||||||||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, net |
10,359 | 1,892 | 44 | | 12,295 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
393 | 727 | 26 | (87 | ) | 1,059 | ||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
168 | 1,360 | 3 | | 1,531 | |||||||||||||||
Total Long-Term Liabilities |
10,920 | 3,979 | 73 | (87 | ) | 14,885 | ||||||||||||||
EQUITY: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Chesapeake stockholders equity |
11,444 | 3,029 | 222 | (3,251 | ) | 11,444 | ||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
| | 897 | | 897 | |||||||||||||||
Total Equity |
11,444 | 3,029 | 1,119 | (3,251 | ) | 12,341 | ||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
$ | 3,253 | $ | 26,777 | $ | 3,220 | $ | (3,336 | ) | $ | 29,914 | |||||||||
33
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
Parent | Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
REVENUES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas and oil sales |
$ | | $ | 1,639 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,639 | ||||||||||
Marketing, gathering and compression sales |
| 856 | 69 | (42 | ) | 883 | ||||||||||||||
Service operations revenue |
| 59 | | | 59 | |||||||||||||||
Total Revenues |
| 2,554 | 69 | (42 | ) | 2,581 | ||||||||||||||
OPERATING COSTS: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Production expenses |
| 231 | | | 231 | |||||||||||||||
Production taxes |
| 34 | | | 34 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
2 | 113 | 10 | | 125 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing, gathering and compression expenses |
| 838 | 37 | (24 | ) | 851 | ||||||||||||||
Service operations expense |
| 52 | | | 52 | |||||||||||||||
Natural gas and oil depreciation, depletion and amortization |
| 378 | | | 378 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of other assets |
| 43 | 13 | | 56 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment or loss on sale of property and equipment |
| 3 | 34 | | 37 | |||||||||||||||
Total Operating Costs |
2 | 1,692 | 94 | (24 | ) | 1,764 | ||||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS |
(2 | ) | 862 | (25 | ) | (18 | ) | 817 | ||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest (expense) income |
(153 | ) | (16 | ) | (1 | ) | 167 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss on redemptions or exchanges of Chesapeake debt |
(59 | ) | | | | (59 | ) | |||||||||||||
Impairment of investments |
| (16 | ) | | | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
167 | 52 | 116 | (167 | ) | 168 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in net earnings of subsidiary |
587 | 44 | | (631 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Total Other Income (Expense) |
542 | 64 | 115 | (631 | ) | 90 | ||||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
540 | 926 | 90 | (649 | ) | 907 | ||||||||||||||
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) |
(18 | ) | 339 | 35 | (7 | ) | 349 | |||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
558 | 587 | 55 | (642 | ) | 558 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CHESAPEAKE |
$ | 558 | $ | 587 | $ | 55 | $ | (642 | ) | $ | 558 | |||||||||
34
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
Parent | Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
REVENUES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas and oil sales |
$ | | $ | 1,187 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,187 | ||||||||||
Marketing, gathering and compression sales |
| 504 | 126 | (55 | ) | 575 | ||||||||||||||
Service operations revenue |
| 49 | | | 49 | |||||||||||||||
Total Revenues |
| 1,740 |