SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
|Preliminary Proxy Statement
|Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|Definitive Proxy Statement
|Definitive Additional Materials
|Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
The Walt Disney Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|No fee required.
|Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|Total fee paid:
|Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|Amount Previously Paid:
|Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
Commencing March 2, 2011, The Walt Disney Company sent the following communication to certain shareholders.
We write with respect to the ISS Proxy Report you may have seen regarding the proposals to be voted on at The Walt Disney Company annual shareholder meeting. We take serious issue with ISSs recommendations against the Companys position on the advisory vote on executive compensation and the shareholder proposal regarding performance tests for restricted stock units. We set forth below why we believe the two negative ISS recommendations are unwarranted.
1. ISSs recommendation to vote against the advisory vote on executive compensation relates to a practice that no longer exists. The recommendation appears to be grounded on a concern that the Company recently extended excise tax gross ups. But, in point of fact, the Companys Compensation Committee has adopted a policy, fully disclosed in the proxy statement, that prohibits excise tax gross ups in any future agreements with executive officers, or in any material amendments or extensions of existing agreements, unless the provision is submitted to approval by shareholders. The recent extension of a gross up that ISS refers to (which would not be permitted under the new policy) occurred over a year ago, was fully disclosed in a Company filing on January 8, 2010, well prior to last years annual meeting and prior to last years ISS proxy report, which made no mention of it. Subsequent to that time, the Compensation Committee, in response to feedback from shareholders, adopted a policy that would prohibit tax gross ups as outlined above. For that reason, we urge that you vote in favor of the advisory vote on executive compensation.
2. In its original recommendation to support the shareholder proposal regarding performance tests for restricted stock unit awards, ISS made frequent reference to what it argued was the short-term nature of a one-year earnings per share component of the Companys current performance test. In point of fact, however, the EPS test is a three-year test. ISS acknowledged this mistake in the introduction to its update, but the body of the report (which relied on that error) and the rationale supporting the recommendation remained unchanged. Again, we believe that, on the basis of a corrected record, ISSs rationale does not hold. The three year EPS measure is an integral component of a long-term performance test that was designed to tie vesting of RSUs to the attainment of long-term performance metrics.
For the foregoing reasons, we believe ISSs recommendations are unwarranted and urge you to vote for the advisory vote on executive compensation and against the shareholder proposal relating to performance tests for restricted stock units.
If you have any questions, you may direct them to Lowell Singer, Senior Vice President Investor Relations, at 818-560-6601.