UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended | Commission File Number: | |
January 29, 2011 | 1-13536 |
7 West Seventh Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
(513) 579-7000
and
151 West 34th Street
New York, New York 10001
(212) 494-1602
Incorporated in Delaware | I.R.S. No. 13-3324058 |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class |
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share | New York Stock Exchange | |
7.45% Senior Debentures due 2017 | New York Stock Exchange | |
6.79% Senior Debentures due 2027 | New York Stock Exchange | |
7% Senior Debentures due 2028 | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer ¨ | Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company ¨ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the registrants common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter (July 31, 2010) was approximately $7,873,300,000.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
Outstanding at February 25, 2011 | |
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share | 423,747,325 shares |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document |
Parts
Into Which Incorporated | |
Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 20, 2011 (Proxy Statement) |
Part III |
Explanatory Note
On August 30, 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of The May Department Stores Company (May) by means of a merger of May with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the Merger). As a result of the Merger, Mays separate corporate existence terminated. Upon the completion of the Merger, the subsidiary was merged with and into the Company and its separate corporate existence terminated. On June 1, 2007, the Company changed its name from Federated Department Stores, Inc. to Macys, Inc. (Macys).
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to Macys or the Company are references to Macys and its subsidiaries and references to 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 are references to the Companys fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010, January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, respectively.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report and other reports, statements and information previously or subsequently filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) contain or may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements are based upon the beliefs and assumptions of, and on information available to, the management of the Company at the time such statements are made. The following are or may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: (i) statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words may, will, could, should, believe, expect, future, potential, anticipate, intend, plan, think, estimate or continue or the negative or other variations thereof, and (ii) statements regarding matters that are not historical facts. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including:
| risks and uncertainties relating to the possible invalidity of the underlying beliefs and assumptions; |
| competitive pressures from department and specialty stores, general merchandise stores, manufacturers outlets, off-price and discount stores, and all other retail channels, including the Internet, mail-order catalogs and television; |
| general consumer-spending levels, including the impact of general economic conditions, consumer disposable income levels, consumer confidence levels, the availability, cost and level of consumer debt, the costs of basic necessities and other goods and the effects of the weather or natural disasters; |
| conditions to, or changes in the timing of, proposed transactions and changes in expected synergies, cost savings and non-recurring charges; |
| possible changes or developments in social, economic, business, industry, market, legal and regulatory circumstances and conditions; |
| actions taken or omitted to be taken by third parties, including customers, suppliers, business partners, competitors and legislative, regulatory, judicial and other governmental authorities and officials; |
| adverse changes in relationships with vendors and other product and service providers; |
| risks related to currency, interest and exchange rates and other capital market, economic and geo-political conditions; |
| risks associated with severe weather, natural disasters and changes in weather patterns; |
| risks associated with an outbreak of an epidemic or pandemic disease; |
| the potential impact of national and international security concerns on the retail environment, including any possible military action, terrorist attacks or other hostilities; |
| risks associated with the possible inability of the Companys manufacturers to deliver products in a timely manner or meet the Companys quality standards; |
| risks associated with the Companys reliance on foreign sources of production, including risks related to the disruption of imports by labor disputes, regional health pandemics, and regional political and economic conditions; |
| risks related to duties, taxes, other charges and quotas on imports; and |
| risks associated with possible systems failures and/or security breaches, including, any security breach that results in the theft, transfer or unauthorized disclosure of customer, employee or company information, or the failure to comply with various laws applicable to the Company in the event of such a breach. |
In addition to any risks and uncertainties specifically identified in the text surrounding such forward-looking statements, the statements in the immediately preceding sentence and the statements under captions such as Risk Factors and Special Considerations in reports, statements and information filed by the Company with the SEC from time to time constitute cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual amounts, results, events and circumstances to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Item 1. | Business. |
General. The Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1985. The Company and its predecessors have been operating department stores since 1830. On June 1, 2007, the Company changed its corporate name from Federated Department Stores, Inc. to Macys, Inc. and the Companys shares began trading under the ticker symbol M on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). As of January 29, 2011, the operations of the Company included approximately 850 stores in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Guam and Puerto Rico under the names Macys and Bloomingdales as well as macys.com and bloomingdales.com. The Company also operates four Bloomingdales Outlet stores.
On June 1, 2005, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a Purchase, Sale and Servicing Transfer Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) with Citibank, N.A. (together with its subsidiaries, as applicable, Citibank). The Purchase Agreement provided for, among other things, the purchase by Citibank of substantially all of (i) the credit card accounts and related receivables owned by FDS Bank, (ii) the Macys credit card accounts and related receivables owned by GE Money Bank, immediately upon the purchase by the Company of such accounts from GE Money Bank, and (iii) the proprietary credit card accounts and related receivables owned by May (collectively, the Credit Assets). In connection with the sale of these assets, the Company and Citibank entered into a long-term marketing and servicing alliance pursuant to the terms of a Credit Card Program Agreement (the Program Agreement) with an initial term of ten years expiring on July 17, 2016 and, unless terminated by either party as of the expiration of the initial term, an additional renewal term of three years. The Program Agreement provides for, among other things, (i) the ownership by Citibank of the accounts purchased by Citibank pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, (ii) the ownership by Citibank of new accounts opened by the Companys customers, (iii) the provision of credit by Citibank to the holders of the credit cards associated with the foregoing accounts, (iv) the servicing of the foregoing accounts, and (v) the allocation between Citibank and the Company of the economic benefits and burdens associated with the foregoing and other aspects of the alliance.
On August 30, 2005, upon the completion of the Merger, the Company acquired Mays approximately 500 department stores and approximately 800 bridal and formalwear stores. Most of the acquired May department stores were converted to the Macys nameplate in September 2006, resulting in a national retailer with stores in almost all major markets. The operations of the acquired Lord & Taylor division and the bridal group (consisting of Davids Bridal, After Hours Formalwear and Priscilla of Boston) have been divested and are presented as discontinued operations.
2
In 2008, the Company announced the My Macys localization initiative which was developed with the goal of accelerating sales growth in existing locations by ensuring that core customers surrounding each Macys store find merchandise assortments, size ranges, marketing programs and shopping experiences that are custom-tailored to their needs. My Macys has concentrated more management talent in local markets, effectively reducing the span of control over local stores; created new positions in the field to work with district planning and buying executives in helping to understand and act on the merchandise needs of local customers; and empowered locally based executives to make more and better decisions. Also as part of My Macys, the Companys Macys branded stores are organized in a unified operating structure and division central office organizations were eliminated. This has reduced central office and administrative expense, eliminated duplication, sharpened execution, and helped the Company to partner more effectively with its suppliers and business partners.
During January 2010, the Company announced plans to launch a new Bloomingdales Outlet store concept in 2010, to initially consist of four Bloomingdales Outlet stores, each with approximately 25,000 square feet. All four Bloomingdales Outlet stores opened during 2010. Additional Bloomingdales Outlet stores are expected to roll out to selected locations across the country in 2011 and beyond. Additionally, in February 2010, Bloomingdales opened in Dubai, United Arab Emirates under a license agreement with Al Tayer Insignia, a company of Al Tayer Group, LLC, under which the Company is entitled to a license fee in accordance with the terms of the underlying agreement, generally based upon the greater of the contractually earned or guaranteed minimum amounts.
The Companys retail stores and Internet websites sell a wide range of merchandise, including mens, womens and childrens apparel and accessories, cosmetics, home furnishings and other consumer goods. The specific assortments vary by size of store, merchandising character and character of customers in the trade areas. Most stores are located at urban or suburban sites, principally in densely populated areas across the United States.
For 2010, 2009 and 2008, the following merchandise constituted the following percentages of sales:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Feminine Accessories, Intimate Apparel, Shoes and Cosmetics |
36 | % | 36 | % | 36 | % | ||||||
Feminine Apparel |
26 | 26 | 27 | |||||||||
Mens and Childrens |
23 | 22 | 22 | |||||||||
Home/Miscellaneous |
15 | 16 | 15 | |||||||||
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||||
In 2010, the Companys subsidiaries provided various support functions to the Companys retail operations on an integrated, company-wide basis.
| The Companys bank subsidiary, FDS Bank, and its financial, administrative and credit services subsidiary, Macys Credit and Customer Service, Inc. (MCCS), provide credit processing, certain collections, customer service and credit marketing services in respect of all proprietary and non-proprietary credit card accounts that are owned either by Department Stores National Bank (DSNB), a subsidiary of Citibank, N.A., or FDS Bank and that constitute a part of the credit programs of the Companys retail operations. |
| Macys Systems and Technology, Inc. (MST), a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company, provides operational electronic data processing and management information services to all of the Companys operations. |
| Macys Merchandising Group, Inc. (MMG), a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of the Company, is responsible for the design, development and marketing of Macys private label brands and certain |
3
licensed brands. Bloomingdales uses MMG for only a very small portion of its private label merchandise. The Company believes that its private label merchandise further differentiates its merchandise assortments from those of its competitors and delivers exceptional value to its customers. The principal private label brands currently offered by Macys include Alfani, American Rag, Bar III, Charter Club, Club Room, Epic Threads, first impressions, Giani Bernini, greendog, Holiday Lane, Hotel Collection, I-N-C, jenni by jennifer moore, John Ashford, JM Collection, Karen Scott, Martha Stewart Collection, Morgan Taylor, Style & Co., Tasso Elba, the cellar, Tools of the Trade, and Via Europa. The principal licensed brands managed by MMG are American Rag and Martha Stewart Collection. The trademarks associated with all of the foregoing brands, other than American Rag and Martha Stewart Collection, are owned by Macys. The American Rag and Martha Stewart Collection brands are owned by third parties, which license the trademarks associated with such brands to Macys pursuant to agreements which are presently scheduled to expire in 2050 and 2027, respectively. |
| Macys Logistics and Operations (Macys Logistics), a division of a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company, provides warehousing and merchandise distribution services for the Companys operations. |
MMG also offers their services, either directly or indirectly, to unrelated third parties.
The Companys executive offices are located at 7 West Seventh Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, telephone number: (513) 579-7000 and 151 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10001, telephone number: (212) 494-1602.
Employees. As of January 29, 2011, the Company had approximately 166,000 regular full-time and part-time employees. Because of the seasonal nature of the retail business, the number of employees peaks in the holiday season. Approximately 10% of the Companys employees as of January 29, 2011 were represented by unions. Management considers its relations with its employees to be satisfactory.
Seasonality. The retail business is seasonal in nature with a high proportion of sales and operating income generated in the months of November and December. Working capital requirements fluctuate during the year, increasing in mid-summer in anticipation of the fall merchandising season and increasing substantially prior to the holiday season when the Company must carry significantly higher inventory levels.
Purchasing. The Company purchases merchandise from many suppliers, no one of which accounted for more than 5% of the Companys net purchases during 2010. The Company has no material long-term purchase commitments with any of its suppliers, and believes that it is not dependent on any one supplier. The Company considers its relations with its suppliers to be satisfactory.
Competition. The retailing industry is intensely competitive. The Companys stores and direct-to-customer business operations compete with many retailing formats in the geographic areas in which they operate, including department stores, specialty stores, general merchandise stores, off-price and discount stores, new and established forms of home shopping (including the Internet, mail order catalogs and television) and manufacturers outlets, among others. The retailers with which the Company competes include Bed Bath & Beyond, Belk, Bon Ton, Burlington Coat Factory, Dillards, Gap, J.C. Penney, Kohls, Limited, Lord & Taylor, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Saks, Sears, Target, TJ Maxx and Wal-Mart. The Company seeks to attract customers by offering superior selections, obvious value, and distinctive marketing in stores that are located in premier locations, and by providing an exciting shopping environment and superior service through an omnichannel experience. Other retailers may compete for customers on some or all of these bases, or on other bases, and may be perceived by some potential customers as being better aligned with their particular preferences.
4
Available Information. The Company makes its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act available free of charge through its internet website at http://www.macysinc.com as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. The public also may read and copy any of these filings at the SECs Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains the Companys filings; the address of that site is http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the Company has made the following available free of charge through its website at http://www.macysinc.com:
| Audit Committee Charter, |
| Compensation and Management Development Committee Charter, |
| Finance Committee Charter, |
| Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, |
| Corporate Governance Principles, |
| Non-Employee Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and |
| Code of Conduct. |
Any of these items are also available in print to any shareholder who requests them. Requests should be sent to the Corporate Secretary of Macys, Inc. at 7 West 7th Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202.
Executive Officers of the Registrant.
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 25, 2011 regarding the executive officers of the Company:
Name |
Age | Position with the Company | ||||
Terry J. Lundgren |
59 | Chairman of the Board; President and Chief Executive Officer; Director | ||||
Janet E. Grove |
60 | Vice Chair | ||||
Timothy M. Adams |
57 | Chief Private Brand Officer | ||||
Thomas L. Cole |
62 | Chief Administrative Officer | ||||
Jeffrey Gennette |
49 | Chief Merchandising Officer | ||||
Julie Greiner |
57 | Chief Merchandise Planning Officer | ||||
Karen M. Hoguet |
54 | Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Ronald Klein |
61 | Chief Stores Officer | ||||
Peter Sachse |
53 | Chief Marketing Officer | ||||
Mark S. Cosby |
52 | President - Stores | ||||
Joel A. Belsky |
57 | Executive Vice President and Controller | ||||
Dennis J. Broderick |
62 | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Terry J. Lundgren has been Chairman of the Board since January 2004 and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since February 2003; prior thereto he served as the President/Chief Operating Officer and Chief Merchandising Officer of the Company from April 2002 to February 2003. Mr. Lundgren served as the President and Chief Merchandising Officer of the Company from May 1997 to April 2002.
Janet E. Grove has been Vice Chair of the Company since February 2009 responsible for facilitating the transition of merchandising, planning and private brand development functions under the new Macys organization structure and International Retail Store Development initiatives; prior thereto she served as Vice
5
Chair, Merchandising, Private Brand and Product Development of the Company from February 2003 to February 2009. Ms. Grove also served as Chairman of MMG from 1998 to 2009 and Chief Executive Officer of MMG from 1999 to 2009.
Timothy M. Adams has been the Chief Private Brand Officer of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto he served as Chairman and CEO of Macys Home Store from July 2005 to February 2009 and as Chairman of Macys Florida from April 2001 to July 2005.
Thomas L. Cole has been Chief Administrative Officer of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto he served as Vice Chair, Support Operations of the Company from February 2003 to February 2009. Until February 2009, he also was responsible for the operations of Macys Logistics since 1995, of MST since 2001, and of MCCS since 2002.
Jeffrey Gennette has been Chief Merchandising Officer of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto he served as Chairman and CEO of Macys West from February 2008 to February 2009, as Chairman of Macys Northwest from December 2005 to February 2008 and as Executive Vice President and Director of Stores of Macys Central from March 2004 to December 2005. Mr. Gennette served as Senior Vice President/General Merchandise Manager of Macys West from May 2001 to March 2004.
Julie Greiner has been Chief Merchandise Planning Officer of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto she served as Chairman and CEO of Macys Florida from July 2005 to February 2009 and as Senior Executive Vice President and Director of Stores of Bloomingdales from April 1998 to July 2005.
Karen M. Hoguet has been Chief Financial Officer of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company from June 2005 to February 2009. Mrs. Hoguet served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company from October 1997 to June 2005.
Ronald Klein has been Chief Stores Officer of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto he served as Chairman and CEO of Macys East from February 2004 to February 2009.
Peter Sachse has been Chief Marketing Officer of the Company since February 2009 and Chairman of macys.com since April 2006; prior thereto he served as President of Macys Corporate Marketing from May 2007 to February 2009 and as Chief Marketing Officer of the Company from June 2003 to May 2007.
Mark S. Cosby has been President Stores of the Company since February 2009; prior thereto he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Macys East from May 2007 to February 2009 and as Senior Vice President Property Development of the Company from July 2006 to May 2007.
Joel A. Belsky has been Executive Vice President and Controller of the Company since May 2009; prior thereto he served as Vice President and Controller of the Company from October 1996 through April 2009.
Dennis J. Broderick has been Secretary of the Company since July 1993 and Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Company since May 2009; prior thereto he served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Company from January 1990 to April 2009.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors. |
In evaluating the Company, the risks described below and the matters described in Forward-Looking Statements should be considered carefully. Such risks and matters could significantly and adversely affect the Companys business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
6
The Company faces significant competition in the retail industry.
The Company conducts its retail merchandising business under highly competitive conditions. Although the Company is one of the nations largest retailers, it has numerous and varied competitors at the national and local levels, including conventional and specialty department stores, other specialty stores, category killers, mass merchants, value retailers, discounters, and Internet and mail-order retailers. Competition may intensify as the Companys competitors enter into business combinations or alliances. Competition is characterized by many factors, including assortment, advertising, price, quality, service, location, reputation and credit availability. If the Company does not compete effectively with regard to these factors, its results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
The Companys sales and operating results depend on consumer preferences and consumer spending.
The fashion and retail industries are subject to sudden shifts in consumer trends and consumer spending. The Companys sales and operating results depend in part on its ability to predict or respond to changes in fashion trends and consumer preferences in a timely manner. The Company develops new retail concepts and continuously adjusts its industry position in certain major and private-label brands and product categories in an effort to satisfy customers. Any sustained failure to anticipate, identify and respond to emerging trends in lifestyle and consumer preferences could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business. The Companys sales are impacted by discretionary spending by consumers. Consumer spending may be affected by many factors outside of the Companys control, including general economic conditions, consumer disposable income levels, consumer confidence levels, the availability, cost and level of consumer debt and customer behaviors towards incurring and paying debt, the costs of basic necessities and other goods and the effects of the weather or natural disasters.
The Companys business is subject to unfavorable economic and political conditions and other developments and risks.
Unfavorable global, domestic or regional economic or political conditions and other developments and risks could negatively affect the Companys business. For example, unfavorable changes related to interest rates, rates of economic growth, fiscal and monetary policies of governments, inflation, deflation, consumer credit availability, consumer debt levels, consumer debt payment behaviors, tax rates and policy, unemployment trends, oil prices, and other matters that influence the availability and cost of merchandise, consumer confidence, spending and tourism could adversely impact the Companys business and results of operations. In addition, unstable political conditions or civil unrest, including terrorist activities and worldwide military and domestic disturbances and conflicts, may disrupt commerce and could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business and results of operations.
The Companys revenues and cash requirements are affected by the seasonal nature of its business.
The Companys business is seasonal, with a high proportion of revenues and operating cash flows generated during the second half of the fiscal year, which includes the fall and holiday selling seasons. A disproportionate amount of revenues fall in the fourth fiscal quarter, which coincides with the holiday season. In addition, the Company incurs significant additional expenses in the period leading up to the months of November and December in anticipation of higher sales volume in those periods, including for additional inventory, advertising and employees.
The Companys business could be affected by extreme weather conditions or natural disasters.
Extreme weather conditions in the areas in which the Companys stores are located could adversely affect the Companys business. For example, frequent or unusually heavy snowfall, ice storms, rainstorms or other extreme weather conditions over a prolonged period could make it difficult for the Companys customers to
7
travel to its stores and thereby reduce the Companys sales and profitability. The Companys business is also susceptible to unseasonable weather conditions. For example, extended periods of unseasonably warm temperatures during the winter season or cool weather during the summer season could render a portion of the Companys inventory incompatible with those unseasonable conditions. Reduced sales from extreme or prolonged unseasonable weather conditions could adversely affect the Companys business.
In addition, natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes, or a combination of these or other factors, could severely damage or destroy one or more of the Companys stores or warehouses located in the affected areas, thereby disrupting the Companys business operations.
The Companys pension costs could increase at a higher than anticipated rate.
Significant changes in interest rates, decreases in the fair value of plan assets and investment losses on plan assets could affect the funded status of the Companys plans and could increase future funding requirements of the pension plans. A significant increase in future funding requirements could have a negative impact on the Companys cash flows, financial condition or results of operations.
Increases in the cost of employee benefits could impact the Companys financial results and cash flow.
The Companys expenses relating to employee health benefits are significant. Unfavorable changes in the cost of such benefits could impact the Companys financial results and cash flow. Healthcare costs have risen significantly in recent years, and recent legislative and private sector initiatives regarding healthcare reform could result in significant changes to the U.S. healthcare system. The Company is not able at this time to determine the impact that healthcare reform could have on the Company-sponsored medical plans.
Inability to access capital markets could adversely affect the Companys business or financial condition.
Changes in the credit and capital markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity and interest rate fluctuations, may increase the cost of financing or restrict the Companys access to this potential source of future liquidity. A decrease in the ratings that rating agencies assign to the Companys short and long-term debt may negatively impact the Companys access to the debt capital markets and increase the Companys cost of borrowing. In addition, the Companys bank credit agreements require the Company to maintain specified interest coverage and leverage ratios. The Companys ability to comply with the ratios may be affected by events beyond its control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. If the Companys results of operations or operating ratios deteriorate to a point where the Company is not in compliance with its debt covenants, and the Company is unable to obtain a waiver, much of the Companys debt would be in default and could become due and payable immediately. The Companys assets may not be sufficient to repay in full this indebtedness, resulting in a need for an alternate source of funding. The Company cannot make any assurances that it would be able to obtain such an alternate source of funding on satisfactory terms, if at all, and its inability to do so could cause the holders of its securities to experience a partial or total loss of their investments in the Company.
The Company periodically reviews the carrying value of its goodwill for possible impairment; if future circumstances indicate that goodwill is impaired, the Company could be required to write down amounts of goodwill and record impairment charges.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company reduced the carrying value of its goodwill from $9,125 million to $3,743 million and recorded a related non-cash impairment charge of $5,382 million. The Company continues to monitor relevant circumstances, including consumer spending levels, general economic conditions and the market prices for the Companys common stock, and the potential impact that such circumstances might have on the valuation of the Companys goodwill. It is possible that changes in such circumstances, or in the numerous variables associated with the judgments, assumptions and estimates made by the Company in assessing
8
the appropriate valuation of its goodwill, could in the future require the Company to further reduce its goodwill and record related non-cash impairment charges. If the Company were required to further reduce its goodwill and record related non-cash impairment charges, the Companys financial position and results of operations would be adversely affected.
The Company depends on its ability to attract and retain quality employees.
The Companys business is dependent upon attracting and retaining a large number of quality employees. Many of these employees are in entry level or part-time positions with historically high rates of turnover. The Companys ability to meet its labor needs while controlling the costs associated with hiring and training new employees is subject to external factors such as unemployment levels, prevailing wage rates, minimum wage legislation and changing demographics. Changes that adversely impact the Companys ability to attract and retain quality employees could adversely affect the Companys business.
The Company depends upon designers, vendors and other sources of merchandise, goods and services.
The Companys relationships with established and emerging designers have been a significant contributor to the Companys past success. The Companys ability to find qualified vendors and access products in a timely and efficient manner is often challenging, particularly with respect to goods sourced outside the United States. The Companys procurement of goods and services from outside the United States is subject to risks associated with political or financial instability, trade restrictions, tariffs, currency exchange rates, transport capacity and costs and other factors relating to foreign trade. In addition, the Companys procurement of all its goods and services is subject to the effects of price increases which the Company may or may not be able to pass through to its customers. All of these factors may affect the Companys ability to access suitable merchandise on acceptable terms, are beyond the Companys control and could adversely impact the Companys performance.
The Company depends upon the success of its advertising and marketing programs.
The Companys advertising and promotional costs, net of cooperative advertising allowances, amounted to $1,072 million for 2010. The Companys business depends on high customer traffic in its stores and effective marketing. The Company has many initiatives in this area, and often changes its advertising and marketing programs. There can be no assurance as to the Companys continued ability to effectively execute its advertising and marketing programs, and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business and results of operations.
The benefits expected to be realized from the expansion of the Companys market localization initiatives and the changes to its operating structure are subject to various risks.
The Companys success in fully realizing the anticipated benefits from the expansion of its market localization initiatives and the changes to its operating structure will depend in large part on achieving anticipated cost savings, business opportunities and growth prospects. The Companys ability to benefit from expanded market localization initiatives and the changes to its operating structure is subject to both the risks affecting the Companys business generally and the inherent difficulties associated with implementing these initiatives. The failure of the Company to fully realize the benefits expected to result from these initiatives could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business and results of operations.
Parties with whom the Company does business may be subject to insolvency risks or may otherwise become unable or unwilling to perform their obligations to the Company.
The Company is a party to contracts, transactions and business relationships with various third parties, including vendors, suppliers, service providers, lenders and participants in joint ventures, strategic alliances and other joint commercial relationships, pursuant to which such third parties have performance, payment and other
9
obligations to the Company. In some cases, the Company depends upon such third parties to provide essential leaseholds, products, services or other benefits, including with respect to store and distribution center locations, merchandise, advertising, software development and support, logistics, other agreements for goods and services in order to operate the Companys business in the ordinary course, extensions of credit, credit card accounts and related receivables, and other vital matters. Current economic, industry and market conditions could result in increased risks to the Company associated with the potential financial distress or insolvency of such third parties. If any of these third parties were to become subject to bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, the rights and benefits of the Company in relation to its contracts, transactions and business relationships with such third parties could be terminated, modified in a manner adverse to the Company, or otherwise impaired. The Company cannot make any assurances that it would be able to arrange for alternate or replacement contracts, transactions or business relationships on terms as favorable as the Companys existing contracts, transactions or business relationships, if at all. Any inability on the part of the Company to do so could negatively affect the Companys cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.
A material disruption in the Companys computer systems could adversely affect the Companys business or results of operations.
The Company relies extensively on its computer systems to process transactions, summarize results and manage its business. The Companys computer systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches, catastrophic events such as fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, acts of war or terrorism, and usage errors by the Companys employees. If the Companys computer systems are damaged or cease to function properly, the Company may have to make a significant investment to fix or replace them, and the Company may suffer loss of critical data and interruptions or delays in its operations in the interim. Any material interruption in the Companys computer systems could adversely affect its business or results of operations.
A privacy breach could result in negative publicity and adversely affect the Companys business.
The protection of customer, employee, and company data is critical to the Company. The regulatory environment surrounding information security and privacy is increasingly demanding, with the frequent imposition of new and constantly changing requirements across business units. In addition, customers have a high expectation that the Company will adequately protect their personal information. A significant breach of customer, employee, or company data could attract a substantial amount of media attention, damage the Companys customer relationships and reputation and result in lost sales, fines, or lawsuits.
A regional or global health pandemic could severely affect the Companys business.
A health pandemic is a disease that spreads rapidly and widely by infection and affects many individuals in an area or population at the same time. If a regional or global health pandemic were to occur, depending upon its location, duration and severity, the Companys business could be severely affected. Customers might avoid public places in the event of a health pandemic, and local, regional or national governments might limit or ban public gatherings to halt or delay the spread of disease. A regional or global health pandemic might also adversely impact the Companys business by disrupting or delaying production and delivery of materials and products in its supply chain and by causing staffing shortages in its stores.
The Company is subject to numerous regulations that could adversely affect its business.
The Company is subject to customs, child labor, truth-in-advertising and other laws, including consumer protection regulations and zoning and occupancy ordinances that regulate retailers generally and/or govern the importation, promotion and sale of merchandise and the operation of retail stores and warehouse facilities. Although the Company undertakes to monitor changes in these laws, if these laws change without the Companys knowledge, or are violated by importers, designers, manufacturers or distributors, the Company could experience
10
delays in shipments and receipt of goods or be subject to fines or other penalties under the controlling regulations, any of which could adversely affect the Companys business.
Litigation or regulatory developments could adversely affect the Companys business or financial condition.
The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and initiatives, including laws and regulations with respect to the credit card industry including the Credit Card Act of 2009 and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act), which may change from time to time. In addition, the Company is regularly involved in various litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Litigation or regulatory developments could adversely affect the Companys business and financial condition.
Factors beyond the Companys control could affect the Companys stock price.
The Companys stock price, like that of other retail companies, is subject to significant volatility because of many factors, including factors beyond the control of the Company. These factors may include:
| general economic and stock and credit market conditions; |
| risks relating to the Companys business and its industry, including those discussed above; |
| strategic actions by the Company or its competitors; |
| variations in the Companys quarterly results of operations; |
| future sales or purchases of the Companys common stock; and |
| investor perceptions of the investment opportunity associated with the Companys common stock relative to other investment alternatives. |
In addition, the Company may fail to meet the expectations of its stockholders or of analysts at some time in the future. If the analysts that regularly follow the Companys stock lower their rating or lower their projections for future growth and financial performance, the Companys stock price could decline. Also, sales of a substantial number of shares of the Companys common stock in the public market or the appearance that these shares are available for sale could adversely affect the market price of the Companys common stock.
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments. |
None.
Item 2. | Properties. |
The properties of the Company consist primarily of stores and related facilities, including warehouses and distribution and fulfillment centers. The Company also owns or leases other properties, including corporate office space in Cincinnati and New York and other facilities at which centralized operational support functions are conducted. As of January 29, 2011, the operations of the Company included 850 retail stores in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Guam, comprising a total of approximately 154,200,000 square feet. Of such stores, 467 were owned, 268 were leased and 115 stores were operated under arrangements where the Company owned the building and leased the land. Substantially all owned properties are held free and clear of mortgages. Pursuant to various shopping center agreements, the Company is obligated to operate certain stores for periods of up to 20 years. Some of these agreements require that the stores be operated under a particular name. Most leases require the Company to pay real estate taxes, maintenance and other costs; some also require additional payments based on percentages of sales and some contain purchase options. Certain of the Companys real estate leases have terms that extend for a significant number of years and provide for rental rates that increase or decrease over time.
11
Additional information about the Companys stores and warehouses, distribution and fulfillment centers (DCs) as of January 29, 2011 is as follows:
Geographic Region |
Total Stores |
Owned Stores |
Leased Stores |
Stores Subject to a Ground Lease |
Total DCs |
Owned DCs |
||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Atlantic |
107 | 55 | 33 | 19 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
North |
84 | 65 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Northeast |
104 | 54 | 41 | 9 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Northwest |
126 | 39 | 69 | 18 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Southeast |
110 | 72 | 17 | 21 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Southwest |
117 | 45 | 48 | 24 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Midwest |
96 | 58 | 27 | 11 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
South Central |
106 | 79 | 18 | 9 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
850 | 467 | 268 | 115 | 21 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||
The eight geographic regions detailed in the foregoing table are based on the Companys Macys branded operational structure.
The Companys retail stores are located at urban or suburban sites, principally in densely populated areas across the United States. Store count activity was as follows:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Store count at beginning of fiscal year |
850 | 847 | 853 | |||||||||
New stores opened and other expansions |
7 | 9 | 11 | |||||||||
Stores closed |
(7 | ) | (6 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||
Store count at end of fiscal year |
850 | 850 | 847 | |||||||||
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings. |
On October 3, 2007, Ebrahim Shanehchian, an alleged participant in the Macys, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Investment Plan (the 401(k) Plan), filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on behalf of persons who participated in the 401(k) Plan and The May Department Stores Company Profit Sharing Plan (the May Plan) between February 27, 2005 and the present. The lawsuit has been conditionally certified as a class action. The complaint alleges that the Company, as well as members of the Companys board of directors and certain members of senior management, breached various fiduciary duties owed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) to participants in the 401(k) Plan and the May Plan, by making false and misleading statements regarding the Companys business, operations and prospects in relation to the integration of the acquired May operations, resulting in supposed artificial inflation of the Companys stock price and imprudent investment by the 401(k) Plan and the May Plan in Macys stock. The plaintiff seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory damages and costs. The Company believes the lawsuit is without merit and intends to contest it vigorously.
The Company and its subsidiaries are also involved in various proceedings that are incidental to the normal course of their businesses. As of the date of this report, the Company does not expect that any of such proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
Item 4. | Reserved. |
12
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. |
The Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the trading symbol M. As of January 29, 2011, the Company had approximately 23,000 stockholders of record. The following table sets forth for each fiscal quarter during 2010 and 2009 the high and low sales prices per share of Common Stock as reported on the NYSE Composite Tape and the dividend declared with respect to each fiscal quarter on each share of Common Stock.
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Low | High | Dividend | Low | High | Dividend | |||||||||||||||||||
1st Quarter |
15.34 | 25.25 | 0.0500 | 6.27 | 14.09 | 0.0500 | ||||||||||||||||||
2nd Quarter |
16.93 | 24.84 | 0.0500 | 10.27 | 15.29 | 0.0500 | ||||||||||||||||||
3rd Quarter |
18.70 | 25.26 | 0.0500 | 13.58 | 20.84 | 0.0500 | ||||||||||||||||||
4th Quarter |
22.78 | 26.32 | 0.0500 | 15.39 | 19.77 | 0.0500 |
The declaration and payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors, are subject to restrictions under the Companys credit facility and may be affected by various other factors, including the Companys earnings, financial condition and legal or contractual restrictions.
The following table provides information regarding the Companys purchases of Common Stock during the fourth quarter of 2010.
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price per Share ($) |
Number of Shares Purchased under Program (1) |
Open Authorization Remaining (1)($) |
|||||||||||||
(thousands) | (thousands) | (millions) | ||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 November 27, 2010 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 852 | ||||||||||||
November 28, 2010 January 1, 2011 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 852 | ||||||||||||
January 2, 2011 January 29, 2011 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 852 | ||||||||||||
0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Commencing in January 2000, the Companys board of directors has from time to time approved authorizations to purchase, in the aggregate, up to $9,500 million of Common Stock. All authorizations are cumulative and do not have an expiration date. As of January 29, 2011, $852 million of authorization remained unused. Although the Company has not made any purchases of Common Stock since February 1, 2008 and currently does not intend to make any such purchases in 2011, it may resume purchases of Common Stock under these or possible future authorizations in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise at any time and from time to time without prior notice. |
13
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Common Stock with the Standard & Poors 500 Composite Index and the Standard & Poors Retail Department Store Index for the period from January 27, 2006 through January 28, 2011, assuming an initial investment of $100 and the reinvestment of all dividends, if any.
The companies included in the S&P Retail Department Store Index are Dillards, Macys, J.C. Penney, Kohls, Nordstrom and Sears.
14
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data. |
The selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto and the other information contained elsewhere in this report.
2010 | 2009** | 2008** | 2007 | 2006* | ||||||||||||||||
(millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 25,003 | $ | 23,489 | $ | 24,892 | $ | 26,313 | $ | 26,970 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
(14,824 | ) | (13,973 | ) | (15,009 | ) | (15,677 | ) | (16,019 | ) | ||||||||||
Inventory valuation adjustments May integration |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (178 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
10,179 | 9,516 | 9,883 | 10,636 | 10,773 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(8,260 | ) | (8,062 | ) | (8,481 | ) | (8,554 | ) | (8,678 | ) | ||||||||||
Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs |
(25 | ) | (391 | ) | (398 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment charges |
0 | 0 | (5,382 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
May integration costs |
0 | 0 | 0 | (219 | ) | (450 | ) | |||||||||||||
Gains on sale of accounts receivable |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 191 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
1,894 | 1,063 | (4,378 | ) | 1,863 | 1,836 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense (a) |
(579 | ) | (562 | ) | (588 | ) | (579 | ) | (451 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest income |
5 | 6 | 28 | 36 | 61 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
1,320 | 507 | (4,938 | ) | 1,320 | 1,446 | ||||||||||||||
Federal, state and local income tax benefit (expense) |
(473 | ) | (178 | ) | 163 | (411 | ) | (458 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
847 | 329 | (4,775 | ) | 909 | 988 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes (b) |
0 | 0 | 0 | (16 | ) | 7 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 847 | $ | 329 | $ | (4,775 | ) | $ | 893 | $ | 995 | |||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 2.00 | $ | .78 | $ | (11.34 | ) | $ | 2.04 | $ | 1.83 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) |
2.00 | .78 | (11.34 | ) | 2.00 | 1.84 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 1.98 | $ | .78 | $ | (11.34 | ) | $ | 2.01 | $ | 1.80 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) |
1.98 | .78 | (11.34 | ) | 1.97 | 1.81 | ||||||||||||||
Average number of shares outstanding |
422.2 | 420.4 | 420.0 | 445.6 | 539.0 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid per share (c) |
$ | .2000 | $ | .2000 | $ | .5275 | $ | .5175 | $ | .5075 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
$ | 1,150 | $ | 1,210 | $ | 1,278 | $ | 1,304 | $ | 1,265 | ||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 505 | $ | 460 | $ | 897 | $ | 1,105 | $ | 1,392 | ||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data (at year end): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,464 | $ | 1,686 | $ | 1,385 | $ | 676 | $ | 1,294 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
20,631 | 21,300 | 22,145 | 27,789 | 29,550 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term debt |
454 | 242 | 966 | 666 | 650 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
6,971 | 8,456 | 8,733 | 9,087 | 7,847 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
5,530 | 4,653 | 4,620 | 9,907 | 12,254 |
* | 53 weeks |
** | The Company changed its methodology for recording deferred state income taxes from a blended rate basis to a separate entity basis, and has reflected the effects of such change retroactively to fiscal 2008. Even though the Company considers the change to have had only an immaterial impact on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the prior periods as previously reported have been adjusted to reflect the change. |
(a) | Interest expense in 2010 includes approximately $66 million of expenses associated with the early retirement of approximately $1,000 million of outstanding debt. Interest expense includes a gain of approximately $54 million in 2006 related to the completion of a debt tender offer. |
(b) | Discontinued operations include (1) for 2007, the after-tax results of the After Hours Formalwear business, including an after-tax loss of $7 million on the disposal of After Hours Formalwear, and (2) for 2006, the after-tax results of operations of the Lord & Taylor division and the Bridal Group division (including Davids Bridal, After Hours Formalwear, and Priscilla of Boston), including after-tax losses of $38 million and $18 million on the disposals of the Lord & Taylor division and the Davids Bridal and Priscilla of Boston businesses, respectively. |
(c) | Cash dividends paid for 2006 have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock-split effected in the form of a stock dividend distributed on June 9, 2006. |
15
Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The Company is a retail organization operating retail stores and Internet websites under two brands (Macys and Bloomingdales) that sell a wide range of merchandise, including mens, womens and childrens apparel and accessories, cosmetics, home furnishings and other consumer goods in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Guam and Puerto Rico. As of January 29, 2011, the Companys operations were conducted through Macys, macys.com, Bloomingdales, bloomingdales.com and Bloomingdales Outlet which are aggregated into one reporting segment in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 280, Segment Reporting.
The Company is focused on four key strategies for continued growth in sales, earnings and cash flow in the years ahead: (i) maximizing the My Macys localization initiative; (ii) developing private and exclusive brands; (iii) embracing customer centricity, including engaging customers on the selling floor; and (iv) driving the omnichannel business.
The My Macys localization initiative was developed with the goal of accelerating sales growth in existing locations by ensuring that core customers surrounding each Macys store find merchandise assortments, size ranges, marketing programs and shopping experiences that are custom-tailored to their needs. My Macys has concentrated more management talent in local markets, effectively reducing the span of control over local stores; created new positions in the field to work with district planning and buying executives in helping to understand and act on the merchandise needs of local customers; and empowered locally based executives to make more and better decisions. Also as part of My Macys, the Companys Macys branded stores are organized in a unified operating structure and division central office organizations were eliminated. This has reduced central office and administrative expense, eliminated duplication, sharpened execution, and helped the Company to partner more effectively with its suppliers and business partners.
The Companys omnichannel strategy allows customers to shop seamlessly in stores, online and via mobile devices. As part of the comprehensive focus on its omnichannel business, the Company is building an efficient and resourceful organization that thrives on unrelenting creativity and innovation. Current and future expansions to the macys.com and bloomingdales.com online businesses represent investments in merchandising, marketing and site development, all of which complement ongoing improvements in systems infrastructure, fulfillment capacity and customer service.
During 2010, the Company launched a new Bloomingdales Outlet store concept, which initially consists of four Bloomingdales Outlet stores, each with approximately 25,000 square feet. Additional Bloomingdales Outlet stores are expected to roll out to selected locations across the country in 2011 and beyond. Bloomingdales Outlet stores offer a range of apparel and accessories, including womens ready-to-wear, mens, childrens, womens shoes, fashion accessories, jewelry, handbags and intimate apparel.
Additionally, in February 2010, Bloomingdales opened in Dubai, United Arab Emirates under a license agreement with Al Tayer Insignia, a company of Al Tayer Group, LLC, under which the Company is entitled to a license fee in accordance with the terms of the underlying agreement, generally based upon the greater of the contractually earned or guaranteed minimum amounts.
During 2010, the Company opened two new Macys stores, one new Bloomingdales store, and four Bloomingdales Outlet stores. During 2009, the Company opened five new Macys department stores, re-opened two Macys department stores that had been damaged in 2008 by Hurricane Ike, opened one replacement Macys department store, and also expanded into an additional Macys location in an existing mall. In 2011, the Company intends to open three Bloomingdales Outlet stores and re-open a Macys department store that had been closed in 2010 due to flood damage.
16
The Companys operations are impacted by competitive pressures from department stores, specialty stores, mass merchandisers and all other retail channels. The Companys operations are also impacted by general consumer spending levels, including the impact of general economic conditions, consumer disposable income levels, consumer confidence levels, the availability, cost and level of consumer debt, the costs of basic necessities and other goods and the effects of weather or natural disasters and other factors over which the Company has little or no control.
Throughout 2008 and into 2009, consumer spending levels were adversely affected by a number of factors, including substantial declines in the level of general economic activity and real estate and investment values, substantial increases in consumer pessimism, unemployment and the costs of basic necessities, and a significant tightening of consumer credit. These conditions adversely affected, and to varying degrees continue to adversely affect, the amount of funds that consumers are willing and able to spend for discretionary purchases, including purchases of some of the merchandise offered by the Company. These conditions also adversely affected the projected future cash flows attributable to the Companys operations, including the projected future cash flows assumed in connection with the acquisition of The May Department Stores Company (May), resulting in the Company recording in the fourth quarter of 2008 a reduction in the carrying value of its goodwill, and a related non-cash impairment charge, in the amount of $5,382 million. The Company experienced significantly higher sales growth and steady gross margin and cash flow in 2010, and therefore is optimistic about the improvement in current and future economic conditions.
The effects of economic conditions have been, and may continue to be, experienced differently, or at different times, in the various geographic regions in which the Company operates, in relation to the different types of merchandise that the Company offers for sale, or in relation to the Companys Macys-branded and Bloomingdales-branded operations. All economic conditions, however, ultimately affect the Companys overall operations. Based on its assessment of current and anticipated market conditions and its recent performance, the Company is assuming that its comparable store sales in 2011 will increase approximately 3% from 2010 levels.
The discussion in this Item 7 should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report. The discussion in this Item 7 contains forward-looking statements that reflect the Companys plans, estimates and beliefs. The Companys actual results could materially differ from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to those differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this report, particularly in Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements.
Results of Operations
Net sales include merchandise sales, leased department income, shipping and handling fees and sales to third party retailers. In 2010, the Company began including sales of private brand goods directly to third party retailers and sales of excess inventory to third parties in net sales. These items were previously reported, net of the related cost of sales, in selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) expenses. This change in presentation had an immaterial impact on reported net sales, does not impact comparable store sales, net income (loss) or diluted earnings (loss) per share, and was not applied retroactively to annual periods prior to fiscal 2010.
The Company changed its methodology for recording deferred state income taxes from a blended rate basis to a separate entity basis, and has reflected the effects of such change to 2010 and all prior periods. Even though the Company considers the change to have had only an immaterial impact on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the prior periods as previously reported have been adjusted to reflect the change.
Comparison of the 52 Weeks Ended January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010. Net income for 2010 was $847 million, compared to net income of $329 million for 2009, reflecting the benefits of the strategic initiatives at
17
Macys and the continued strong performance at Bloomingdales. The net income for 2010 includes the impact of $25 million of impairments and store closing costs. The net income for 2009 included the impact of $391 million of impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs.
Net sales for 2010 totaled $25,003 million, compared to net sales of $23,489 million for 2009, an increase of $1,514 million or 6.4%. On a comparable store basis, net sales for 2010 were up 4.6% compared to 2009. Sales from the Companys Internet businesses in 2010 increased 28.7% compared to 2009 and positively affected the Companys 2010 comparable store sales by 0.9%. The Company has realized continued success in the My Macys localization strategy. Geographically, sales in 2010 were strongest in Florida and the upper Midwest. By family of business, sales in 2010 were strongest in updated womens apparel, particularly the Companys I-N-C brand, jewelry and watches, mens apparel and accessories, luggage, furniture and mattresses. Sales of the Companys private label brands continued to be strong and represented approximately 20% of net sales in the Macys-branded stores in 2010. Sales in 2010 were less strong in traditional womens sportswear. The Company calculates comparable store sales as sales from stores in operation throughout 2009 and 2010 and all net Internet sales. Stores undergoing remodeling, expansion or relocation remain in the comparable store sales calculation unless the store is closed for a significant period of time. Definitions and calculations of comparable store sales differ among companies in the retail industry.
Cost of sales was $14,824 million or 59.3% of net sales for 2010, compared to $13,973 million or 59.5% of net sales for 2009, an increase of $851 million. The improved cost of sales rate reflects the benefit of good inventory management throughout 2010. The valuation of merchandise inventories on the last-in, first-out basis did not impact cost of sales in either period.
SG&A expenses were $8,260 million or 33.0% of net sales for 2010, compared to $8,062 million or 34.3% of net sales for 2009, an increase of $198 million. The SG&A rate as a percent of net sales was lower in 2010, as compared to 2009, reflecting an increase in net sales. SG&A expenses in 2010 increased due to higher selling costs as a result of stronger sales, higher workers compensation and general liability insurance costs, higher pension and supplementary retirement plan expense, and higher costs in support of the Companys omnichannel operations, partially offset by lower depreciation and amortization expense, lower stock-based compensation expense, higher income from credit operations and lower advertising expense. Workers compensation and general liability insurance costs were $148 million for 2010, compared to $124 million for 2009. Pension and supplementary retirement plan expense amounted to $144 million for 2010, compared to $110 million for 2009. Depreciation and amortization expense was $1,150 million for 2010, compared to $1,210 million for 2009. Stock-based compensation expense was $66 million for 2010, compared to $76 million for 2009. Income from credit operations was $332 million in 2010 as compared to $323 million in 2009. Advertising expense, net of cooperative advertising allowances, was $1,072 million for 2010 compared to $1,087 million for 2009.
Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs for 2010 amounted to $25 million and included $18 million of asset impairment charges and $7 million of other costs and expenses related to the store closings announced in January 2011.
Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs for 2009 amounted to $391 million and included $115 million of asset impairment charges, $6 million of other costs and expenses related to the store closings announced in January 2010, and $270 million of restructuring-related costs and expenses associated with the division consolidation and localization initiatives, primarily severance and other human resource-related costs.
Net interest expense was $574 million for 2010, compared to $556 million for 2009, an increase of $18 million. The increase in net interest expense is primarily due to approximately $66 million of expenses associated with the early retirement of approximately $1,000 million of outstanding debt during 2010, partially offset by lower levels of borrowings due primarily to such early retirement of outstanding debt.
18
The Companys effective tax rate of 35.8% for 2010 and 35.2% for 2009 differ from the federal income tax statutory rate of 35%, and on a comparative basis, principally because of the effect of state and local income taxes and the settlement of various tax issues and tax examinations. Federal, state and local income tax expense for 2009 included a benefit of approximately $21 million related to the settlement of federal income tax examinations, primarily attributable to the disposition of former subsidiaries.
Comparison of the 52 Weeks Ended January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009. Net income for 2009 was $329 million, compared to the net loss of $4,775 million for 2008. The net income for 2009 included the impact of $391 million of impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs. The net loss for 2008 included the impact of $5,382 million of goodwill impairment charges and $398 million of impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs.
Net sales for 2009 totaled $23,489 million, compared to net sales of $24,892 million for 2008, a decrease of $1,403 million or 5.6%. On a comparable store basis, net sales for 2009 were down 5.3% compared to 2008. Sales from the Companys Internet businesses in 2009 increased 19.6% compared to 2008 and positively affected the Companys 2009 comparable store sales by 0.6%. Geographically, sales in 2009 were strong in the Midwest and weaker in Florida and California. By family of business, sales in 2009 were strongest in moderate apparel, updated better womens sportswear, womens shoes, outerwear, jewelry and watches, housewares, home textiles and mattresses. Sales of the Companys private label brands continued to be strong and represented approximately 19% of net sales in the Macys-branded stores in 2009. The weaker businesses during 2009 included traditional better womens sportswear, mens suits, handbags, fragrances, fine china and crystal and furniture. The Company calculates comparable store sales as net sales from stores in operation throughout 2008 and 2009 and all net Internet sales. Stores undergoing remodeling, expansion or relocation remain in the comparable store sales calculation unless the store is closed for a significant period of time. Definitions and calculations of comparable store sales differ among companies in the retail industry.
Cost of sales was $13,973 million or 59.5% of net sales for 2009, compared to $15,009 million or 60.3% of net sales for 2008, a decrease of $1,036 million. The improved cost of sales rate reflected the benefit of good inventory management throughout 2009. The valuation of merchandise inventories on the last-in, first-out basis did not impact cost of sales in either period.
SG&A expenses were $8,062 million or 34.3% of net sales for 2009, compared to $8,481 million or 34.1% of net sales for 2008, a decrease of $419 million. The SG&A rate as a percent of net sales was higher in 2009, as compared to 2008, primarily because of weaker sales. SG&A expenses in 2009 benefited from consolidation-related expense savings, lower depreciation and amortization expenses, lower workers compensation and general liability insurance costs and lower advertising expense, partially offset by higher stock-based compensation expense, higher performance based incentive compensation expense, lower income from credit operations and higher costs in support of the Companys omnichannel operations. Depreciation and amortization expense was $1,210 million for 2009, compared to $1,278 million for 2008. Workers compensation and general liability insurance costs were $124 million for 2009, compared to $164 million for 2008. Advertising expense, net of cooperative advertising allowances, was $1,087 million for 2009 compared to $1,239 million for 2008. Stock-based compensation expense was $76 million for 2009, compared to $43 million for 2008. Income from credit operations was $323 million in 2009 as compared to $372 million in 2008. Pension and supplementary retirement plan expense amounted to $110 million for 2009, compared to $114 million for 2008.
Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs for 2009 amounted to $391 million and included $115 million of asset impairment charges, $6 million of other costs and expenses related to the store closings announced in January 2010, and $270 million of restructuring-related costs and expenses associated with the division consolidation and localization initiatives, primarily severance and other human resource-related costs.
19
Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs for 2008 amounted to $398 million and included $211 million of asset impairment charges, $11 million of other costs and expenses related to the store closings announced in January 2009, and $176 million of restructuring-related costs and expenses associated with the division consolidation and localization initiatives, primarily severance and other human resource-related costs.
Goodwill impairment charges for 2008 amounted to $5,382 million, which represented a write down of goodwill in the amount of the excess of the previous carrying value of goodwill over the implied fair value of goodwill, as calculated under the two-step goodwill impairment process in accordance with ASC Subtopic 350-20, Goodwill.
Net interest expense was $556 million for 2009, compared to $560 million for 2008, a decrease of $4 million. The decrease in net interest expense for 2009, as compared to 2008, resulted primarily from a lower level of borrowings due to retirement of debt at maturity and the debt tender offer completed during 2009, and was partially offset by a decrease in interest income due to lower rates on invested cash.
The Companys effective income tax rate of 35.2% for 2009 differed from the federal income tax statutory rate of 35.0% principally because of the effect of state and local income taxes and the settlement of various tax issues and tax examinations. Federal, state and local income tax expense for 2009 included a benefit of approximately $21 million related to the settlement of federal income tax examinations, primarily attributable to the disposition of former subsidiaries. The Companys effective income tax rate for 2008 differed from the federal income tax statutory rate of 35.0%, principally because of the impact of non-deductible goodwill impairment charges, the effect of state and local income taxes and the settlement of various tax issues and tax examinations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys principal sources of liquidity are cash from operations, cash on hand and the credit facility described below.
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2010 was $1,506 million, compared to $1,750 million provided in 2009. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2010 compared to 2009 includes a greater decrease in other liabilities not separately identified, primarily accelerated pension contributions. During 2010, the Company made pension funding contributions totaling approximately $825 million, compared to pension funding contributions made during 2009 of approximately $370 million.
Net cash used by investing activities was $465 million for 2010, compared to net cash used by investing activities of $377 million for 2009. Investing activities for 2010 include purchases of property and equipment totaling $339 million and capitalized software of $166 million, compared to purchases of property and equipment totaling $355 million and capitalized software of $105 million for 2009. Cash flows from investing activities included $74 million and $60 million from the disposition of property and equipment for 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Companys budgeted capital expenditures are approximately $800 million for 2011, primarily related to store remodels, maintenance, technology and omnichannel investments, and distribution network improvements, including construction of a new fulfillment center. Management presently anticipates funding such expenditures with cash on hand and cash from operations.
Net cash used by the Company for all financing activities was $1,263 million for 2010, including the repayment of $1,245 million of debt and the payment of $84 million of cash dividends, partially offset by an increase in outstanding checks of $24 million and the issuance of $43 million of common stock, primarily related
20
to the exercise of stock options. The debt repaid during 2010 includes the early retirement of approximately $1,000 million of outstanding debt with various stated maturities, and payment at maturity of $76 million of 8.5% senior notes due June 1, 2010 and $150 million of 10.625% senior debentures due November 1, 2010.
Net cash used by the Company for all financing activities was $1,072 million for 2009, including the repayment of $966 million of debt, a decrease in outstanding checks of $29 million, and the payment of $84 million of cash dividends. The debt repaid during 2009 included $350 million of 6.30% senior notes due April 1, 2009 and $600 million of 4.80% senior notes due July 15, 2009.
The Company is a party to a credit agreement with certain financial institutions providing for revolving credit borrowings and letters of credit in an aggregate amount not to exceed $2,000 million (which amount may be increased to $2,500 million at the option of the Company, subject to the willingness of existing or new lenders to provide commitments for such additional financing) outstanding at any particular time. This agreement is set to expire August 30, 2012. As of January 29, 2011 and throughout all of 2010, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under this agreement.
The credit agreement requires the Company to maintain a specified interest coverage ratio for the latest four quarters of no less than 3.25 and a specified leverage ratio as of and for the latest four quarters of no more than 4.50. The Companys interest coverage ratio for 2010 was 5.64 and its leverage ratio at January 29, 2011 was 2.34, in each case as calculated in accordance with the credit agreement. The interest coverage ratio is defined as EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) over net interest expense and the leverage ratio is defined as debt over EBITDA. For purposes of these calculations EBITDA is calculated as net income plus interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash impairment of goodwill, intangibles and real estate, non-recurring cash charges not to exceed in the aggregate $500 million from the date of the agreement and extraordinary losses less interest income and non-recurring or extraordinary gains. Debt and net interest are adjusted to exclude the premium on acquired debt and the resulting amortization, respectively.
A breach of a restrictive covenant in the Companys credit agreement or the inability of the Company to maintain the financial ratios described above could result in an event of default under the credit agreement. In addition, an event of default would occur under the credit agreement if any indebtedness of the Company in excess of an aggregate principal amount of $150 million becomes due prior to its stated maturity or the holders of such indebtedness become able to cause it to become due prior to its stated maturity. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lenders could, subject to the terms and conditions of the credit agreement, elect to declare the outstanding principal, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable.
Moreover, most of the Companys senior notes and debentures contain cross-default provisions based on the non-payment at maturity, or other default after an applicable grace period, of any other debt, the unpaid principal amount of which is not less than $100 million, that could be triggered by an event of default under the credit agreement. In such an event, the Companys senior notes and debentures that contain cross-default provisions would also be subject to acceleration.
At January 29, 2011, no notes or debentures contain provisions requiring acceleration of payment upon a debt rating downgrade. However, the terms of approximately $3,000 million in aggregate principal amount of the Companys senior notes outstanding at that date require the Company to offer to purchase such notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest in specified circumstances involving both a change of control (as defined in the applicable indenture) of the Company and the rating of the notes by specified rating agencies at a level below investment grade.
The rate of interest payable in respect of $612 million in aggregate principal amount of the Companys senior notes outstanding at January 29, 2011 decreased by .50 percent per annum to 8.375% effective in May 2010 as a result of an upgrade of the notes by specified rating agencies. The rate of interest payable in respect of
21
these senior notes outstanding at January 29, 2011 could increase by up to 1.50 percent per annum or decrease by up to .50 percent per annum from its current level in the event of one or more downgrades or upgrades of the notes by specified rating agencies.
During 2010, the Company repurchased no shares of its common stock under its share repurchase program. The Companys share repurchase program is currently suspended. As of January 29, 2011, the Company had approximately $850 million of authorization remaining under its share repurchase program. The Company may continue or, from time to time, suspend repurchases of shares under its share repurchase program, depending on prevailing market conditions, alternate uses of capital and other factors.
On February 25, 2011, the Companys board of directors declared a quarterly dividend of 5 cents per share on its common stock, payable April 1, 2011 to Macys shareholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 2011.
At January 29, 2011, the Company had contractual obligations (within the scope of Item 303(a)(5) of Regulation S-K) as follows:
Obligations Due, by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less than 1 Year |
1 3 Years |
3 5 Years |
More than 5 Years |
||||||||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term debt |
$ | 451 | $ | 451 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Long-term debt |
6,702 | 0 | 1,219 | 1,179 | 4,304 | |||||||||||||||
Interest on debt |
5,082 | 472 | 814 | 685 | 3,111 | |||||||||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
58 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 35 | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
1,354 | 26 | 375 | 245 | 708 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
2,612 | 245 | 446 | 340 | 1,581 | |||||||||||||||
Letters of credit |
38 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Other obligations |
2,320 | 1,988 | 265 | 61 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 18,617 | $ | 3,226 | $ | 3,129 | $ | 2,517 | $ | 9,745 | |||||||||||
Other obligations in the foregoing table consist primarily of merchandise purchase obligations and obligations under outsourcing arrangements, construction contracts, employment contracts, group medical/dental/life insurance programs, energy and other supply agreements identified by the Company and liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits that the Company expects to settle in cash in the next year. The Companys merchandise purchase obligations fluctuate on a seasonal basis, typically being higher in the summer and early fall and being lower in the late winter and early spring. The Company purchases a substantial portion of its merchandise inventories and other goods and services otherwise than through binding contracts. Consequently, the amounts shown as Other obligations in the foregoing table do not reflect the total amounts that the Company would need to spend on goods and services in order to operate its businesses in the ordinary course.
The Company has not included in the contractual obligations table approximately $170 million of long-term liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits for various tax positions taken or approximately $76 million of related accrued federal, state and local interest and penalties. These liabilities may increase or decrease over time as a result of tax examinations, and given the status of examinations, the Company cannot reliably estimate the period of any cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities. The Company has included in the contractual obligations table $11 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits that the Company expects to settle in cash in the next year. The Company has not included in the contractual obligation table the $220 million Pension Plan liability. The Companys funding policy is to contribute amounts necessary to satisfy pension funding requirements, including requirements of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, plus such additional amounts from time to time as are determined to be appropriate to improve the Pension Plans funded status. The Pension Plans
22
funded status is affected by many factors including discount rates and the performance of Pension Plan assets. On March 28, 2011, the Company made a voluntary funding contribution to the Pension Plan of $225 million. The Company does not presently anticipate making any additional funding contributions to the Pension Plan during 2011, but may choose to do so in its discretion.
Management believes that, with respect to the Companys current operations, cash on hand and funds from operations, together with its credit facility and other capital resources, will be sufficient to cover the Companys reasonably foreseeable working capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirements and other cash requirements in both the near term and over the longer term. The Companys ability to generate funds from operations may be affected by numerous factors, including general economic conditions and levels of consumer confidence and demand; however, the Company expects to be able to manage its working capital levels and capital expenditure amounts so as to maintain sufficient levels of liquidity. To the extent that the Companys cash balances from time to time exceed amounts that are needed to fund its immediate liquidity requirements, the Company will consider alternative uses of some or all of such excess cash. Depending upon its actual and anticipated sources and uses of liquidity, conditions in the capital markets and other factors, the Company will from time to time consider the issuance of debt or other securities, or other possible capital markets transactions, for the purpose of raising capital which could be used to refinance current indebtedness or for other corporate purposes, and the redemption or repurchase of debt or other securities through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise.
Management believes the department store business and other retail businesses will continue to consolidate. The Company intends from time to time to consider additional acquisitions of, and investments in, department stores and other complementary assets and companies. Acquisition transactions, if any, are expected to be financed from one or more of the following sources: cash on hand, cash from operations, borrowings under existing or new credit facilities and the issuance of long-term debt or other securities, including common stock.
Critical Accounting Policies
Merchandise Inventories
Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) retail inventory method. Under the retail inventory method, inventory is segregated into departments of merchandise having similar characteristics, and is stated at its current retail selling value. Inventory retail values are converted to a cost basis by applying specific average cost factors for each merchandise department. Cost factors represent the average cost-to-retail ratio for each merchandise department based on beginning inventory and the fiscal year purchase activity. The retail inventory method inherently requires management judgments and contains estimates, such as the amount and timing of permanent markdowns to clear unproductive or slow-moving inventory, which may impact the ending inventory valuation as well as gross margins.
Permanent markdowns designated for clearance activity are recorded when the utility of the inventory has diminished. Factors considered in the determination of permanent markdowns include current and anticipated demand, customer preferences, age of the merchandise and fashion trends. When a decision is made to permanently mark down merchandise, the resulting gross profit reduction is recognized in the period the markdown is recorded.
The Company receives certain allowances from various vendors in support of the merchandise it purchases for resale. The Company receives certain allowances as reimbursement for markdowns taken and/or to support the gross margins earned in connection with the sales of merchandise. These allowances are generally credited to cost of sales at the time the merchandise is sold in accordance with ASC Subtopic 605-50, Customer Payments and Incentives. The Company also receives advertising allowances from more than 1,000 of its merchandise vendors pursuant to cooperative advertising programs, with some vendors participating in multiple programs. These allowances represent reimbursements by vendors of costs incurred by the Company to promote the
23
vendors merchandise and are netted against advertising and promotional costs when the related costs are incurred in accordance with ASC Subtopic 605-50. Advertising allowances in excess of costs incurred are recorded as a reduction of merchandise costs. The arrangements pursuant to which the Companys vendors provide allowances, while binding, are generally informal in nature and one year or less in duration. The terms and conditions of these arrangements vary significantly from vendor to vendor and are influenced by, among other things, the type of merchandise to be supported. Although it is highly unlikely that there will be any significant reduction in historical levels of vendor support, if such a reduction were to occur, the Company could experience higher costs of sales and higher advertising expense, or reduce the amount of advertising that it uses, depending on the specific vendors involved and market conditions existing at the time.
Physical inventories are generally taken within each merchandise department annually, and inventory records are adjusted accordingly, resulting in the recording of actual shrinkage. While it is not possible to quantify the impact from each cause of shrinkage, the Company has loss prevention programs and policies that are intended to minimize shrinkage. Physical inventories are taken at all store locations for substantially all merchandise categories approximately three weeks before the end of the fiscal year. Shrinkage is estimated as a percentage of sales at interim periods and for this approximate three-week period, based on historical shrinkage rates.
Long-Lived Asset Impairment and Restructuring Charges
The carrying values of long-lived assets are periodically reviewed by the Company whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential impairment has occurred. For long-lived assets held for use, a potential impairment has occurred if projected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets. The estimate of cash flows includes managements assumptions of cash inflows and outflows directly resulting from the use of those assets in operations. When a potential impairment has occurred, an impairment write-down is recorded if the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. The Company believes its estimated cash flows are sufficient to support the carrying value of its long-lived assets. If estimated cash flows significantly differ in the future, the Company may be required to record asset impairment write-downs.
If the Company commits to a plan to dispose of a long-lived asset before the end of its previously estimated useful life, estimated cash flows are revised accordingly, and the Company may be required to record an asset impairment write-down. Additionally, related liabilities arise such as severance, contractual obligations and other accruals associated with store closings from decisions to dispose of assets. The Company estimates these liabilities based on the facts and circumstances in existence for each restructuring decision. The amounts the Company will ultimately realize or disburse could differ from the amounts assumed in arriving at the asset impairment and restructuring charge recorded.
The Company classifies certain long-lived assets as held for disposal by sale and ceases depreciation when the particular criteria for such classification are met, including the probable sale within one year. For long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, an impairment charge is recorded if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value less costs to sell. Such valuations include estimations of fair values and incremental direct costs to transact a sale.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company reviews the carrying value of its goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives at least annually for possible impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives have been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing. The reporting units are the Companys retail operating divisions. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually at the end of the fiscal month of May. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step involves estimating the fair value of
24
each reporting unit based on its estimated discounted cash flows and comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If this comparison indicates that a reporting units estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, a second step is required. If applicable, the second step requires the Company to allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to the estimated fair value of the reporting units net assets, with any fair value in excess of amounts allocated to such net assets representing the implied fair value of goodwill for that reporting unit. If the carrying value of an individual indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, such individual indefinite-lived intangible asset is written down by an amount equal to such excess.
The Company uses judgment in assessing whether assets may have become impaired between annual impairment tests. The occurrence of a change in circumstances, such as continued adverse business conditions or other economic factors, would determine the need for impairment testing between annual impairment tests. Due to deterioration in the general economic environment during 2008 (and the impact thereof on the Companys then-most recently completed annual business plan) and the resultant decline in the Companys market capitalization, the Company believed that an additional goodwill impairment test was required as of January 31, 2009. In performing the first step of this impairment test, the Company estimated the fair value of its reporting units by discounting their projected future cash flows to present value, and reconciling the aggregate estimated fair value of the Companys reporting units to the trading value of the Companys common stock (together with an implied control premium). The Company believes that this reconciliation process represents a market participant approach to valuation. Based on this analysis, the Company determined that the carrying value of each of the Companys reporting units exceeded its fair value at January 31, 2009, which resulted in all of the Companys reporting units failing the first step of the goodwill impairment test. The Company then undertook the second step of the goodwill impairment test, which involved, among other things, obtaining third-party appraisals of substantially all of the Companys tangible and intangible assets. Based on the results of its goodwill impairment testing as of January 31, 2009, the Company recorded a pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of $5,382 million ($5,083 million after income taxes) in the fourth quarter of 2008. As a result of the 2008 goodwill impairment charge, the Macys retail operating division is the only reporting unit with goodwill.
Based on the results of the most recent annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets completed during the second quarter of 2010, the Company determined that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets were not impaired as of May 29, 2010 and the estimated fair value of the Macys retail operating division substantially exceeded its carrying value.
The goodwill impairment testing process involves the use of significant assumptions, estimates and judgments by management, and is subject to inherent uncertainties and subjectivity. Estimating a reporting units discounted cash flows involves the use of significant assumptions, estimates and judgments with respect to a variety of factors, including sales, gross margin and SG&A rates, capital expenditures, cash flows and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate. Projected sales, gross margin and SG&A expense rate assumptions and capital expenditures are based on the Companys annual business plan or other forecasted results. Discount rates reflect market-based estimates of the risks associated with the projected cash flows of the reporting unit directly resulting from the use of its assets in its operations. The allocation of the estimated fair value of the Companys reporting units to the estimated fair value of their net assets also involves the use of significant assumptions, estimates and judgments. Both the estimates of the fair value of the Companys reporting units and the allocation of the estimated fair value of the reporting units to their net assets are based on the best information available to the Companys management as of the date of the assessment.
The use of different assumptions, estimates or judgments in either step of the goodwill impairment testing process, including with respect to the estimated future cash flows of the Companys reporting units, the discount rate used to discount such estimated cash flows to their net present value, the reasonableness of the resultant implied control premium relative to the Companys market capitalization, and the appraised fair value of the reporting units tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, could materially increase or decrease the fair value of the reporting unit and/or its net assets and, accordingly, could materially increase or decrease any related impairment charge.
25
Income Taxes
Income taxes are estimated based on the tax statutes, regulations and case law of the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred income tax assets are evaluated for recoverability based on all available evidence, including past operating results, estimates of future taxable income, and the feasibility of tax planning strategies. Deferred income tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized.
The Company changed its methodology for recording deferred state income taxes from a blended rate basis to a separate entity basis, and has reflected the effects of such change to 2010 and all prior periods. Even though the Company considers the change to have had only an immaterial impact on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the prior periods as previously reported have been adjusted to reflect the change.
Uncertain tax positions are recognized if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Uncertain tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are then measured to determine the amount of benefit eligible for recognition in the financial statements. Each uncertain tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Uncertain tax positions are evaluated and adjusted as appropriate, while taking into account the progress of audits of various taxing jurisdictions. The Company does not anticipate that resolution of these matters will have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Significant judgment is required in evaluating the Companys uncertain tax positions, provision for income taxes, and any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. Although the Company believes that its judgments are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected in the Companys historical income provisions and accruals.
Self-Insurance Reserves
The Company, through its insurance subsidiaries, is self-insured for workers compensation and general liability claims up to certain maximum liability amounts. Although the amounts accrued are actuarially determined by third parties based on analysis of historical trends of losses, settlements, litigation costs and other factors, the amounts the Company will ultimately disburse could differ from such accrued amounts.
Pension and Supplementary Retirement Plans
The Company has a funded defined benefit pension plan (the Pension Plan) and an unfunded defined benefit supplementary retirement plan (the SERP). The Company accounts for these plans in accordance with ASC Topic 715, Compensation Retirement Benefits. Under ASC Topic 715, an employer recognizes the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability on the balance sheet and recognizes changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. Additionally, pension expense is recognized on an accrual basis over employees approximate service periods. The pension expense calculation is generally independent of funding decisions or requirements. The Company anticipates that Pension and SERP expense, which was approximately $144 million in 2010, will remain comparable in 2011.
26
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 provides the funding requirements for the Pension Plan which are different from the employers accounting for the plan as outlined in ASC Topic 715. During 2010, the Company made funding contributions to the Pension Plan totaling approximately $825 million. On March 28, 2011, the Company made a voluntary funding contribution to the Pension Plan of $225 million. The Company does not presently anticipate making any additional funding contributions to the Pension Plan during 2011, but may choose to do so in its discretion. Management believes that, with respect to the Companys current operations, cash on hand and funds from operations, together with available borrowing under its credit facility and other capital resources, will be sufficient to cover the Companys Pension Plan cash requirements in both the near term and also over the longer term.
At January 29, 2011, the Company had unrecognized actuarial losses of $1,116 million for the Pension Plan and $113 million for the SERP. The unrecognized losses for the Pension Plan and the SERP will be recognized as a component of pension expense in future years in accordance with ASC Topic 715, and is expected to impact 2011 Pension and SERP expense by approximately $90 million.
The calculation of pension expense and pension liabilities requires the use of a number of assumptions. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience may differ significantly from current expectations. The Company believes that the most critical assumptions relate to the long-term rate of return on plan assets (in the case of the Pension Plan), the discount rate used to determine the present value of projected benefit obligations and the weighted average rate of increase of future compensation levels.
As of January 29, 2011, the Company lowered the assumed annual long-term rate of return for the Pension Plans assets from 8.75% to 8.00% based on expected future returns on the portfolio. The Company develops its expected long-term rate of return assumption by evaluating input from several professional advisors taking into account the asset allocation of the portfolio and long-term asset class return expectations, as well as long-term inflation assumptions. Pension expense increases or decreases as the expected rate of return on the assets of the Pension Plan decreases or increases, respectively. Lowering the expected long-term rate of return on the Pension Plans assets by 0.25% (from 8.00% to 7.75%) would increase the estimated 2011 pension expense by approximately $8 million and raising the expected long-term rate of return on the Pension Plans assets by 0.25% (from 8.00% to 8.25%) would decrease the estimated 2011 pension expense by approximately $8 million.
The Company discounted its future pension obligations using a rate of 5.40% at January 29, 2011, compared to 5.65% at January 30, 2010. The discount rate used to determine the present value of the Companys Pension Plan and SERP obligations is based on a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of high quality corporate debt securities with various maturities. Each years expected future benefit payments are discounted to their present value at the appropriate yield curve rate, thereby generating the overall discount rate for Pension Plan and SERP obligations. Pension liability and future pension expense both increase or decrease as the discount rate is reduced or increased, respectively. Lowering the discount rate by 0.25% (from 5.40% to 5.15%) would increase the projected benefit obligation at January 29, 2011 by approximately $98 million and would increase estimated 2011 pension expense by approximately $11 million. Increasing the discount rate by 0.25% (from 5.40% to 5.65%) would decrease the projected benefit obligation at January 29, 2011 by approximately $89 million and would decrease estimated 2011 pension expense by approximately $10 million.
The assumed weighted average age-graded rate of increase in future compensation levels was 4.5% at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 for the Pension Plan, and 4.9% at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 for the SERP. The Company develops its rate of compensation increase assumption on an age-graded basis based on recent experience and reflects an estimate of future compensation levels taking into account general increase levels, seniority, promotions and other factors. This assumption was revised during 2009 based on the completion of a third-party assumption study reflecting more recent experience. Pension liabilities and future pension expense both increase or decrease as the weighted average rate of increase of future compensation levels is
27
increased or decreased, respectively. Increasing or decreasing the assumed weighted average rate of increase of future compensation levels by 0.25% would increase or decrease the projected benefit obligation at January 29, 2011 by approximately $16 million and change estimated 2011 pension expense by approximately $4 million.
New Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, which provides amendments and requires new disclosures relating to ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and also conforming amendments to guidance relating to ASC Topic 715, Compensation Retirement Benefits. The Company adopted this guidance on January 31, 2010, except for the disclosure requirement regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which the Company adopted on January 30, 2011. This guidance is limited to the form and content of disclosures, and the portion thereof that has been adopted did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company does not anticipate that the full adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2010-20, which amends various sections of ASC Topic 310, Receivables, relating to a companys allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. The amendment requires companies to provide disaggregated levels of disclosure by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable to enable users of the financial statements to understand the nature of credit risk, how the risk is analyzed in determining the related allowance for credit losses and changes to the allowance during the reporting period. The Company adopted this guidance as of January 29, 2011, except as it relates to disclosures regarding activities during a reporting period, which is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 31, 2010. This guidance is limited to the form and content of disclosures. The initial adoption did not have, and the full adoption is not expected to have, an impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2010-28, which amends ASC Topic 350, Goodwill and Other, relating to the goodwill impairment test of a reporting unit with zero or negative carrying amounts. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates that may adversely affect its financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In seeking to minimize the risks from interest rate fluctuations, the Company manages exposures through its regular operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. The Company does not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and is not a party to any leveraged financial instruments.
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk through its borrowing activities, which are described in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The majority of the Companys borrowings are under fixed rate instruments. However, the Company, from time to time, may use interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements to help manage its exposure to interest rate movements and reduce borrowing costs. At January 29, 2011, the Company was not a party to any derivative financial instruments and based on the Companys lack of market risk sensitive instruments outstanding at January 29, 2011, the Company has determined that there was no material market risk exposure to the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as of such date.
28
Item 8. | Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. |
Information called for by this item is set forth in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and supplementary data contained in this report and is incorporated herein by this reference. Specific financial statements and supplementary data can be found at the pages listed in the following index:
Page | ||||
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 |
F-5 | |||
F-6 | ||||
F-7 | ||||
F-8 |
29
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. |
None.
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures. |
a. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have carried out, as of January 29, 2011, with the participation of the Companys management, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports the Company files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
b. Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Companys management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Companys management conducted an assessment of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, the Companys management has concluded that, as of January 29, 2011, the Companys internal control over financial reporting is effective.
The Companys independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has audited the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011 and has issued an attestation report expressing an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, as stated in their report located on page F-3.
c. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recently completed fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
d. Certifications
The certifications of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are filed as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this report. Additionally, in 2010 the Companys Chief Executive Officer certified to the NYSE that he was not aware of any violation by the Company of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
30
Item 9B. | Other Information. |
In January 2011, the Company determined that the performance restricted stock unit agreements issued to participants in the Companys long-term incentive program (including the Companys principal executive officer, principal financial officer and other named executive officers) on March 19, 2010 contained an erroneous definition of Net Sales in the definition of the EBITDA Margin performance goal. On February 25, 2011, the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors authorized the Company to include language in the form of the performance restricted stock unit agreement to be used for 2011 grants, which is filed as Exhibit 10.23 to this report, correcting the definition of Net Sales in the 2010 agreement. Additional information regarding the performance restricted stock units granted to the Companys named executive officers in fiscal 2010 is set forth under Compensation Discussion & Analysis and Compensation of the Named Executives for 2010 in the Proxy Statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and incorporated herein by reference.
31
PART III
Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant. |
Information called for by this item is set forth under Item 1 Election of Directors and Further Information Concerning the Board of Directors Committees of the Board and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the Proxy Statement to be delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Proxy Statement), and Item 1. Business Executive Officers of the Registrant in this report and incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. | Executive Compensation. |
Information called for by this item is set forth under Compensation Discussion & Analysis, Compensation of the Named Executives for 2010, Compensation Committee Report and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in the Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. |
Information called for by this item is set forth under Stock Ownership Certain Beneficial Owners and Stock Ownership Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers in the Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. |
Information called for by this item is set forth under Further Information Concerning the Board of Directors Director Independence and Policy on Related Person Transactions in the Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
Information called for by this item is set forth under Item 2 Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in the Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
32
PART IV
Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. |
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. Financial Statements:
The list of financial statements required by this item is set forth in Item 8 Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data and is incorporated herein by reference.
2. Financial Statement Schedules:
All schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable, not required, or the information is included elsewhere in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto.
3. Exhibits:
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Document if Incorporated by Reference | ||
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation | Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 18, 2010 (the May 18, 2010 Form 8-K) | ||
3.1.1 | Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock | Exhibit 3.1.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 1995 | ||
3.2 | Amended and Restated By-Laws | Exhibit 3.2 to the May 18, 2010 Form 8-K | ||
4.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation | See Exhibits 3.1 and 3.1.1 | ||
4.2 | Amended and Restated By-Laws | See Exhibit 3.2 | ||
4.3 | Indenture, dated as of January 15, 1991, among the Company (as successor to The May Department Stores Company (May Delaware)), Macys Retail Holdings, Inc. (Macys Retail) (f/k/a The May Department Stores Company (NY) or May New York) and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (BNY Mellon, successor to J.P. Morgan Trust Company and as successor to The First National Bank of Chicago), as Trustee (the 1991 Indenture) | Exhibit 4(2) to May New Yorks Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 1991 | ||
4.3.1 | Guarantee of Securities, dated as of August 30, 2005, by the Company relating to the 1991 Indenture | Exhibit 10.13 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2005 (the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K) | ||
4.4 | Indenture, dated as of December 15, 1994, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to State Street Bank and Trust Company and The First National Bank of Boston), as Trustee (the 1994 Indenture) | Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-88328) filed on January 9, 1995 |
33
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Document if Incorporated by Reference | ||
4.4.1 | Eighth Supplemental Indenture to the 1994 Indenture, dated as of July 14, 1997, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to State Street Bank and Trust Company and The First National Bank of Boston), as Trustee | Exhibit 2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 15, 1997 (the July 1997 Form 8-K) | ||
4.4.2 | Ninth Supplemental Indenture to the 1994 Indenture, dated as of July 14, 1997, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to State Street Bank and Trust Company and The First National Bank of Boston), as Trustee | Exhibit 3 to the July 1997 Form 8-K | ||
4.4.3 | Tenth Supplemental Indenture to the 1994 Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2005, among the Company, Macys Retail and U.S. Bank National Association (as successor to State Street Bank and Trust Company and as successor to The First National Bank of Boston), as Trustee | Exhibit 10.14 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K | ||
4.4.4 | Guarantee of Securities, dated as of August 30, 2005, by the Company relating to the 1994 Indenture | Exhibit 10.16 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K | ||
4.5 | Indenture, dated as of September 10, 1997, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to Citibank, N.A.), as Trustee (the 1997 Indenture) | Exhibit 4.4 to the Companys Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-34321) filed on September 11, 1997 | ||
4.5.1 | First Supplemental Indenture to the 1997 Indenture, dated as of February 6, 1998, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to Citibank, N.A.), as Trustee | Exhibit 2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 1998 | ||
4.5.2 | Third Supplemental Indenture to the 1997 Indenture, dated as of March 24, 1999, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to Citibank, N.A.), as Trustee | Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-76795) filed on April 22, 1999 | ||
4.5.3 | Fifth Supplemental Trust Indenture dated as of March 27, 2001, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to Citibank, N.A.), as Trustee | Exhibit 4 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 26, 2001 | ||
4.5.4 | Seventh Supplemental Indenture to the 1997 Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2005 among the Company, Macys Retail and U.S. Bank National Association (successor to Citibank, N.A.), as Trustee | Exhibit 10.15 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K |
34
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Document if Incorporated by Reference | ||
4.5.5 | Guarantee of Securities, dated as of August 30, 2005, by the Company relating to the 1997 Indenture | Exhibit 10.17 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K | ||
4.6 | Indenture, dated as of June 17, 1996, among the Company (as successor to May Delaware), Macys Retail (f/k/a May New York) and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (BNY Mellon, successor to J.P. Morgan Trust Company), as Trustee (the 1996 Indenture) | Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-06171) filed on June 18, 1996 by May Delaware | ||
4.6.1 | First Supplemental Indenture to the 1996 Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2005, by and among the Company (as successor to May Delaware), Macys Retail (f/k/a May New York) and BNY Mellon, as Trustee | Exhibit 10.9 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K | ||
4.7 | Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2004, among the Company (as successor to May Delaware), Macys Retail (f/k/a May New York) and BNY Mellon, as Trustee (the 2004 Indenture) | Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-00079) filed July 21, 2004 by May Delaware | ||
4.7.1 | First Supplemental Indenture to the 2004 Indenture, dated as of August 30, 2005 among the Company (as successor to May Delaware), Macys Retail and BNY Mellon, as Trustee | Exhibit 10.10 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K | ||
4.8 | Indenture, dated as of November 2, 2006, by and among Macys Retail, the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (the 2006 Indenture) | Exhibit 4.6 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR (Registration No. 333-138376) filed on November 2, 2006 | ||
4.8.1 | First Supplemental Indenture to the 2006 Indenture, dated November 29, 2006, among Macys Retail, the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee | Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 29, 2006 | ||
4.8.2 | Second Supplemental Indenture to the 2006 Indenture, dated March 12, 2007, among Macys Retail, the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee | Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2007 (the March 12, 2007 Form 8-K) | ||
4.8.3 | Third Supplemental Indenture to the 2006 Indenture, dated March 12, 2007, among Macys Retail, the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee | Exhibit 4.2 to the March 12, 2007 Form 8-K | ||
4.8.4 | Fourth Supplemental Indenture to the 2006 Indenture, dated as of August 31, 2007, among Macys Retail, as issuer, the Company, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee | Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 31, 2007 |
35
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Document if Incorporated by Reference | ||
4.8.5 | Fifth Supplemental Trust Indenture to the 2006 Indenture, dated as of June 26, 2008, among Macys Retail, as issuer, Macys, Inc., as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee | Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2008 | ||
10.1+ | Amendment and Restatement Agreement dated as of dated as of December 18, 2008, among Macys, Inc., Macys Retail, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and paying agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, which includes as an exhibit the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of January 5, 2009, among Macys, Inc., Macys Retail, the lenders from time to time parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agents, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as paying agent, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as joint bookrunners and joint lead arrangers | Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 8, 2009 (the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q) | ||
10.2 | Amended and Restated Guarantee Agreement, dated as of January 5, 2009, among the Company, Macys Retail, certain subsidiary guarantors and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as paying agent | Exhibit 10.2 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q | ||
10.3 | Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2005, among the Company, Macys Retail and Banc of America Securities LLC | Exhibit 10.6 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K | ||
10.4 | Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2005, among the Company, Macys Retail and Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Exhibit 10.7 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K | ||
10.5 | Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2005, among the Company, Macys Retail and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. | Exhibit 10.8 to the August 30, 2005 Form 8-K | ||
10.6 | Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2006, among the Company and Loop Capital Markets, LLC | Exhibit 10.6 to the 2006 Form 10-K | ||
10.7 | Tax Sharing Agreement | Exhibit 10.10 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 10, filed on November 27, 1991, as amended (the Form 10) |
36
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Document if Incorporated by Reference | ||
10.8+ | Purchase, Sale and Servicing Transfer Agreement, effective as of June 1, 2005, among the Company, FDS Bank, Prime II Receivables Corporation (Prime II) and Citibank, N.A. (Citibank) | Exhibit 10.3 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q | ||
10.8.1 | Letter Agreement, dated August 22, 2005, among the Company, FDS Bank, Prime II and Citibank | Exhibit 10.17.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-13536) for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 (the 2005 Form 10-K) | ||
10.8.2+ | Second Amendment to Purchase, Sale and Servicing Transfer Agreement, dated October 24, 2005, between the Company and Citibank | Exhibit 10.4 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q | ||
10.8.3 | Third Amendment to Purchase, Sale and Servicing Transfer Agreement, dated May 1, 2006, between the Company and Citibank | Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2006 | ||
10.8.4+ | Fourth Amendment to Purchase, Sale and Servicing Transfer Agreement, dated May 22, 2006, between the Company and Citibank | Exhibit 10.5 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q | ||
10.9+ | Credit Card Program Agreement, effective as of June 1, 2005, among the Company, FDS Bank, Macys Credit and Customer Services, Inc. (MCCS) (f/k/a FACS Group, Inc.) and Citibank | Exhibit 10.6 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q | ||
10.9.1+ | First Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, dated October 24, 2005, between the Company and Citibank | Exhibit 10.7 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q | ||
10.9.2+ | Second Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, dated May 22, 2006, between the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, Macys West Stores, Inc. (f/k/a Macys Department Stores, Inc,) (MWSI), Bloomingdales, Inc. (Bloomingdales) and Department Stores National Bank (DSNB) and Citibank | Exhibit 10.8 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q | ||
10.9.3 | Restated Letter Agreement, dated May 30, 2008 and effective as of December 18, 2006, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdales, Inc. (Bloomingdales), and DSNB (as assignee of Citibank, N.A.) | Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 3, 2008 (the May 3, 2008 Form 10-Q) | ||
10.9.4 | Restated Letter Agreement, dated May 30, 2008 and effective as of March 22, 2007, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdales and DSNB | Exhibit 10.7 to the May 3, 2008 Form 10-Q |
37
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Document if Incorporated by Reference | ||
10.9.5 | Restated Letter Agreement, dated May 30, 2008 and effective as of April 6, 2007, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdales and DSNB | Exhibit 10.8 to the May 3, 2008 Form 10-Q | ||
10.9.6 | Restated Letter Agreement, dated May 30, 2008 and effective as of June 1, 2007, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdales and DSNB | Exhibit 10.9 to the May 3, 2008 Form 10-Q | ||
10.9.7 | Restated Third Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, dated May 31, 2008 and effective as of February 3, 2008, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdales and DSNB | Exhibit 10.10 to the May 3, 2008 Form 10-Q | ||
10.9.8+ | Fourth Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, effective as of August 1, 2008, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdales and DSNB. | Exhibit 10.9 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q | ||
10.9.9+ | Fifth Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2009, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdales and DSNB | Exhibit 10.10 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q | ||
10.9.10+ | Sixth Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, effective as of June 1, 2009, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdales and DSNB | Exhibit 10.11 to the September 8, 2009 Form 10-Q | ||
10.9.11+ | Seventh Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement, effective as of February 26, 2010, among the Company, FDS Bank, MCCS, MWSI, Bloomingdales and DSNB | Exhibit 10.9.11 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-13536) for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 | ||
10.10 | 1995 Executive Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of June 1, 2007 (the 1995 Plan) * | Exhibit 10.11 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 (the 2008 Form 10-K) | ||
10.11 | 1992 Incentive Bonus Plan, as amended and restated as of February 3, 2007 * | Appendix B to the Companys Proxy Statement dated April 4, 2007 | ||
10.12 | 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of June 1, 2007 * | Exhibit 10.13 to the 2008 Form 10-K | ||
10.13 | Form of Indemnification Agreement * | Exhibit 10.14 to the Form 10 | ||
10.14 | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2007, between Terry J. Lundgren and the Company (the Lundgren Employment Agreement) * | Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2007 | ||
10.14.1 | Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 19, 2010, between Terry J. Lundgren and the Company | Exhibit 10.5 to the March 25, 2010 Form 8-K (the March 25, 2010 Form 8-K) * |
38
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Document if Incorporated by Reference | ||
10.15 | Employment Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2008, between Thomas L. Cole and Macys Corporate Services, Inc. * | Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 22, 2008 (the April 22, 2008 Form 8-K) | ||
10.16 | Employment Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2008, between Janet Grove and Macys Merchandising Group, Inc. * | Exhibit 10.2 to the April 22, 2008 Form 8-K | ||
10.17 | Employment Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2008, between Karen M. Hoguet and Macys Corporate Services, Inc. * | Exhibit 10.3 to the April 22, 2008 Form 8-K | ||
10. 18 | Form of Employment Agreement for Executives and Key Employees * | Exhibit 10.31 the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-10951) for fiscal year ended January 29, 1994 | ||
10.19 | Executive Severance Plan, effective November 1, 2009 * | Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 7, 2009 (the December 7, 2009 Form 10-Q) | ||
10.20 | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for the 1995 Plan (for Executives and Key Employees) * | Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 25, 2005 | ||
10.20.1 | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for the 1995 Plan (for Executives and Key Employees), as amended * | Exhibit 10.33.1 to the 2005 Form 10-K | ||
10.20.2 | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan * | Exhibit 10.7 to the Current Report on From 8-K (File No. 001-00079) filed on March 23, 2005 by May Delaware (the March 23, 2005 Form 8-K) | ||
10.20.3 | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (for Executives and Key Employees) * | |||
10.21 | Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2007, by and between the Company and Terry Lundgren * | Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2007 | ||
10.22 | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan * | Exhibit 10.4 to the March 23, 2005 Form 8-K | ||
10.22.1 | Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan * | Exhibit 10.3 to the March 25, 2010 Form 8-K | ||
10.23 | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan * | |||
10.24 | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (Founders Award) * | Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 8-K dated March 24, 2009 | ||
10.25 | Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan * | Exhibit 10.4 to the March 25, 2010 Form 8-K | ||
10.26 | Supplementary Executive Retirement Plan * | Exhibit 10.29 to the 2008 Form 10-K |
39
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Document if Incorporated by Reference | ||
10.27 | Executive Deferred Compensation Plan * | Exhibit 10.30 to the 2008 Form 10-K | ||
10.28 | Macys, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Investment Plan (the Plan) (amending and restating the Macys, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Investment Plan and The May Department Stores Company Profit Sharing Plan), effective as of September 1, 2008 * | Exhibit 10.31 to the 2008 Form 10-K | ||
10.28.1 | First Amendment to the Plan regarding matching rate with respect to the Plans 2009 plan year, effective as of January 1, 2009 * | |||
10.28.2 | Second Amendment to the Plan regarding certain rollover requirements added by the Pension Protection Act of 2006, restated effective as of January 1, 2008 * | |||
10.28.3 | Third Amendment to the Plan regarding matching rate with respect to the Plans 2010 plan year, effective January 1, 2010 * | |||
10.28.4 | Fourth Amendment to the Plan regarding deferral percentage and average actual contribution limits, effective January 1, 2010 * | |||
10.28.5 | Fifth Amendment to the Plan regarding the Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act of 2008, effective as of January 1, 2008 * | |||
10.28.6 | Sixth Amendment to the Plan regarding matching rate with respect to the Plans plan year on or after January 1, 2011, effective as of January 1, 2011 * | |||
10.28.7 | Seventh Amendment to the Plan regarding name change of the Plan effective as of April 1, 2011 * | |||
10.29 | Director Deferred Compensation Plan * | Exhibit 10.33 to the 2008 Form 10-K | ||
10.30 | Stock Credit Plan for 2006 2007 of Federated Department Stores, Inc. * | Exhibit 10.43 to the 2005 Form 10-K | ||
10.30.1 | Stock Credit Plan for 2008 2009 of Macys, Inc. (as amended as of August 22, 2008) * | Exhibit 10.1 to the August 2, 2008 Form 10-Q | ||
10.31 | Macys, Inc. 2009 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan * | Appendix B to the Companys Proxy Statement dated April 1, 2009 | ||
10.32 | Change in Control Plan, effective November 1, 2009 * | Exhibit 10.2 to the December 7, 2009 Form 10-Q | ||
10.33 | Time Sharing Agreement between Macys, Inc. and Terry J. Lundgren, dated March 25, 2011 * | |||
21 | Subsidiaries | |||
23 | Consent of KPMG LLP | |||
24 | Powers of Attorney | |||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
40
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Document if Incorporated by Reference | ||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) | |||
32.1 | Certifications by Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | |||
32.2 | Certifications by Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | |||
101** | The following financial statements from Macys, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 2011, filed on March 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail. |
+ | Portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. The confidential portions have been provided to the SEC. |
* | Constitutes a compensatory plan or arrangement. |
** | As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
MACYS, INC. | ||
By: | /s/ DENNIS J. BRODERICK | |
Dennis J. Broderick Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | ||
Date: March 30, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 30, 2011.
Signature |
Title | |
* Terry J. Lundgren |
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Director | |
* Karen M. Hoguet |
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) | |
* Joel A. Belsky |
Executive Vice President and Controller (principal accounting officer) | |
* Stephen F. Bollenbach |
Director | |
* Deirdre Connelly |
Director | |
* Meyer Feldberg |
Director | |
* Sara Levinson |
Director | |
* Joseph Neubauer |
Director | |
* Joseph A. Pichler |
Director | |
* Joyce M. Roché |
Director | |
* Craig E. Weatherup |
Director | |
* Marna C. Whittington |
Director |
* | The undersigned, by signing his name hereto, does sign and execute this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to the Powers of Attorney executed by the above-named officers and directors and filed herewith. |
By: | /s/ DENNIS J. BRODERICK | |
Dennis J. Broderick Attorney-in-Fact |
42
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||||
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 |
F-5 | |||
F-6 | ||||
F-7 | ||||
F-8 |
F-1
To the Shareholders of
Macys, Inc.:
The integrity and consistency of the Consolidated Financial Statements of Macys, Inc. and subsidiaries, which were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, are the responsibility of management and properly include some amounts that are based upon estimates and judgments.
The Company maintains a system of internal accounting controls, which is supported by a program of internal audits with appropriate management follow-up action, to provide reasonable assurance, at appropriate cost, that the Companys assets are protected and transactions are properly recorded. Additionally, the integrity of the financial accounting system is based on careful selection and training of qualified personnel, organizational arrangements which provide for appropriate division of responsibilities and communication of established written policies and procedures.
The Companys management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and has issued Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been audited by KPMG LLP. Their report expresses their opinion as to the fair presentation, in all material respects, of the financial statements and is based upon their independent audits.
The Audit Committee, composed solely of outside directors, meets periodically with KPMG LLP, the internal auditors and representatives of management to discuss auditing and financial reporting matters. In addition, KPMG LLP and the Companys internal auditors meet periodically with the Audit Committee without management representatives present and have free access to the Audit Committee at any time. The Audit Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm, which is subject to shareholder approval, and the general oversight review of managements discharge of its responsibilities with respect to the matters referred to above.
Terry J. Lundgren
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Karen M. Hoguet
Chief Financial Officer
Joel A. Belsky
Executive Vice President and Controller
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Macys, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Macys, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 29, 2011. We also have audited Macys, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Macys, Inc.s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A(b), Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Macys, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 29, 2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, Macys, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
March 30, 2011
F-3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(millions, except per share data)
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 25,003 | $ | 23,489 | $ | 24,892 | ||||||
Cost of sales |
(14,824 | ) | (13,973 | ) | (15,009 | ) | ||||||
Gross margin |
10,179 | 9,516 | 9,883 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(8,260 | ) | (8,062 | ) | (8,481 | ) | ||||||
Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs |
(25 | ) | (391 | ) | (398 | ) | ||||||
Goodwill impairment charges |
0 | 0 | (5,382 | ) | ||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
1,894 | 1,063 | (4,378 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(579 | ) | (562 | ) | (588 | ) | ||||||
Interest income |
5 | 6 | 28 | |||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
1,320 | 507 | (4,938 | ) | ||||||||
Federal, state and local income tax benefit (expense) |
(473 | ) | (178 | ) | 163 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 847 | $ | 329 | $ | (4,775 | ) | |||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ | 2.00 | $ | .78 | $ | (11.34 | ) | |||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ | 1.98 | $ | .78 | $ | (11.34 | ) | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(millions)
January 29, 2011 | January 30, 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,464 | $ | 1,686 | ||||
Receivables |
392 | 358 | ||||||
Merchandise inventories |
4,758 | 4,615 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
285 | 223 | ||||||
Total Current Assets |
6,899 | 6,882 | ||||||
Property and Equipment net |
8,813 | 9,507 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,743 | 3,743 | ||||||
Other Intangible Assets net |
637 | 678 | ||||||
Other Assets |
539 | 490 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 20,631 | $ | 21,300 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Short-term debt |
$ | 454 | $ | 242 | ||||
Merchandise accounts payable |
1,421 | 1,312 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
2,644 | 2,626 | ||||||
Income taxes |
182 | 68 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
364 | 214 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
5,065 | 4,462 | ||||||
Long-Term Debt |
6,971 | 8,456 | ||||||
Deferred Income Taxes |
1,245 | 1,132 | ||||||
Other Liabilities |
1,820 | 2,597 | ||||||
Shareholders Equity: |
||||||||
Common stock (423.3 and 420.8 shares outstanding) |
5 | 5 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
5,696 | 5,689 | ||||||
Accumulated equity |
2,990 | 2,227 | ||||||
Treasury stock |
(2,431 | ) | (2,515 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(730 | ) | (753 | ) | ||||
Total Shareholders Equity |
5,530 | 4,653 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
$ | 20,631 | $ | 21,300 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(millions)
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Accumulated Equity |
Treasury Stock |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total Shareholders Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance at February 2, 2008 |
$ | 5 | $ | 5,609 | $ | 7,032 | $ | (2,557 | ) | $ | (182 | ) | $ | 9,907 | ||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in methodology of deferred state income taxes |
(54 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at February 2, 2008, as revised |
5 | 5,609 | 6,978 | (2,557 | ) | (182 | ) | 9,853 | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
(4,775 | ) | (4,775 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss on post employment and postretirement |
(294 | ) | (294 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of income |
(17 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassifications to net loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized loss on marketable securities, net of income |
7 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss on post employment and postretirement benefit plans, net of income tax |
1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior service credit on post employment and postretirement benefit plans, net of income tax |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
(5,079 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends ($.5275 per share) |
(221 | ) | (221 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchases |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
61 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued under stock plans |
(7 | ) | 13 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plan distributions |
1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 31, 2009 |
5 | 5,663 | 1,982 | (2,544 | ) | (486 | ) | 4,620 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
329 | 329 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss on post employment and postretirement |
(266 | ) | (266 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of income |
5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassifications to net income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial gain on postretirement benefit plans, |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Prior service credit on post employment benefit plans, |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends ($.20 per share) |
(84 | ) | (84 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchases |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
50 | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued under stock plans |
(24 | ) | 29 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plan distributions |
1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 30, 2010 |
5 | 5,689 | 2,227 | (2,515 | ) | (753 | ) | 4,653 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
847 | 847 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss on post employment and postretirement |
(17 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of income |
5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassifications to net income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss on postretirement benefit plans, |
36 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior service credit on post employment benefit plans, |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
870 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends ($.20 per share) |
(84 | ) | (84 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchases |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
47 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued under stock plans |
(40 | ) | 82 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plan distributions |
3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 29, 2011 |
$ | 5 | $ | 5,696 | $ | 2,990 | $ | (2,431 | ) | $ | (730 | ) | $ | 5,530 | ||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(millions)
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 847 | $ | 329 | $ | (4,775 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Impairments, store closing costs and division consolidation costs |
25 | 391 | 398 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment charges |
0 | 0 | 5,382 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,150 | 1,210 | 1,278 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
66 | 76 | 43 | |||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and premium on acquired debt |
(25 | ) | (23 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in receivables |
(51 | ) | 7 | (1 | ) | |||||||
(Increase) decrease in merchandise inventories |
(143 | ) | 154 | 291 | ||||||||
(Increase) decrease in supplies and prepaid expenses |
(10 | ) | 3 | (7 | ) | |||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets not separately identified |
2 | (16 | ) | 1 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in merchandise accounts payable |
91 | 29 | (90 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities not separately identified |
(45 | ) | (201 | ) | (228 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in current income taxes |
115 | 40 | (146 | ) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in deferred income taxes |
241 | 123 | (315 | ) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities not separately identified |
(757 | ) | (372 | ) | 62 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
1,506 | 1,750 | 1,866 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(339 | ) | (355 | ) | (761 | ) | ||||||
Capitalized software |
(166 | ) | (105 | ) | (136 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from property insurance claims |
6 | 26 | 68 | |||||||||
Disposition of property and equipment |
74 | 60 | 38 | |||||||||
Other, net |
(40 | ) | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used by investing activities |
(465 | ) | (377 | ) | (792 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Debt issued |
0 | 0 | 650 | |||||||||
Financing costs |
0 | 0 | (18 | ) | ||||||||
Debt repaid |
(1,245 | ) | (966 | ) | (666 | ) | ||||||
Dividends paid |
(84 | ) | (84 | ) | (221 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in outstanding checks |
24 | (29 | ) | (116 | ) | |||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||
Issuance of common stock |
43 | 8 | 7 | |||||||||
Net cash used by financing activities |
(1,263 | ) | (1,072 | ) | (365 | ) | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(222 | ) | 301 | 709 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
1,686 | 1,385 | 676 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
$ | 1,464 | $ | 1,686 | $ | 1,385 | ||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 627 | $ | 601 | $ | 642 | ||||||
Interest received |
5 | 9 | 26 | |||||||||
Income taxes paid (net of refunds received) |
108 | 35 | 323 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Macys, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) is a retail organization operating retail stores and Internet websites under two brands (Macys and Bloomingdales) that sell a wide range of merchandise, including mens, womens and childrens apparel and accessories, cosmetics, home furnishings and other consumer goods in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Guam and Puerto Rico. As of January 29, 2011, the Companys operations were conducted through Macys, macys.com, Bloomingdales, bloomingdales.com and Bloomingdales Outlet, which are aggregated into one reporting segment in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 280, Segment Reporting. The metrics used by management to assess the performance of the Companys operating divisions include sales trends, gross margin rates, expense rates, and rates of earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). The Companys operating divisions have historically had similar economic characteristics and are expected to have similar economic characteristics and long-term financial performance in future periods.
For 2010, 2009 and 2008, the following merchandise constituted the following percentages of sales:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Feminine Accessories, Intimate Apparel, Shoes and Cosmetics |
36 | % | 36 | % | 36 | % | ||||||
Feminine Apparel |
26 | 26 | 27 | |||||||||
Mens and Childrens |
23 | 22 | 22 | |||||||||
Home/Miscellaneous |
15 | 16 | 15 | |||||||||
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||||
The Companys fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 ended on January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. References to years in the Consolidated Financial Statements relate to fiscal years rather than calendar years.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company from time to time invests in companies engaged in complementary businesses. Investments in companies in which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, are accounted for by the equity method. All marketable equity and debt securities held by the Company are accounted for under ASC Topic 320, Investments Debt and Equity Securities, with unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities being included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income tax effect. All other investments are carried at cost. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates and assumptions are subject to inherent uncertainties, which may result in actual amounts differing from reported amounts.
Certain reclassifications were made to prior years amounts to conform with the classifications of such amounts for the most recent year.
F-8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net sales include merchandise sales, leased department income and shipping and handling fees. In 2010, the Company began including sales of private brand goods directly to third party retailers and sales of excess inventory to third parties in net sales. These items were previously reported, net of the related cost of sales, in selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A). This change in presentation had an immaterial impact on reported net sales, does not impact comparable store sales, net income (loss) or diluted earnings (loss) per share, and was not applied retroactively to annual periods prior to fiscal 2010. The Company licenses third parties to operate certain departments in its stores. The Company receives commissions from these licensed departments based on a percentage of net sales. Commissions are recognized as income at the time merchandise is sold to customers. Sales taxes collected from customers are not considered revenue and are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities until remitted to the taxing authorities. Cost of sales consists of the cost of merchandise, including inbound freight, and shipping and handling costs. Sales of merchandise are recorded at the time of delivery and reported net of merchandise returns. An estimated allowance for future sales returns is recorded and cost of sales is adjusted accordingly.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents also includes credit card sales transactions that are settled early in the following period and amounted to $104 million at January 29, 2011 and $98 million at January 30, 2010.
In connection with the sale of the Companys credit assets, the Company and Citibank, N.A. entered into a long-term marketing and servicing alliance pursuant to the terms of a Credit Card Program Agreement (the Program Agreement) (see Note 4, Receivables). Income earned under the Program Agreement is treated as a reduction of SG&A expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Under the Program Agreement, Citibank offers proprietary and non-proprietary credit to the Companys customers through previously existing and newly opened accounts.
The Company maintains customer loyalty programs in which customers are awarded certificates based on their spending. Upon reaching certain levels of qualified spending, customers automatically receive certificates to apply toward future purchases. The Company recognizes the estimated net amount of the certificates that will be earned and redeemed as a reduction to net sales.
Merchandise inventories are valued at lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) retail inventory method. Under the retail inventory method, inventory is segregated into departments of merchandise having similar characteristics, and is stated at its current retail selling value. Inventory retail values are converted to a cost basis by applying specific average cost factors for each merchandise department. Cost factors represent the average cost-to-retail ratio for each merchandise department based on beginning inventory and the fiscal year purchase activity. The retail inventory method inherently requires management judgments and estimates, such as the amount and timing of permanent markdowns to clear unproductive or slow-moving inventory, which may impact the ending inventory valuation as well as gross margins.
Permanent markdowns designated for clearance activity are recorded when the utility of the inventory has diminished. Factors considered in the determination of permanent markdowns include current and anticipated demand, customer preferences, age of the merchandise and fashion trends. When a decision is made to permanently mark down merchandise, the resulting gross margin reduction is recognized in the period the markdown is recorded.
Physical inventories are generally taken within each merchandise department annually, and inventory records are adjusted accordingly, resulting in the recording of actual shrinkage. While it is not possible to quantify the impact from each cause of shrinkage, the Company has loss prevention programs and policies that
F-9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
are intended to minimize shrinkage. Physical inventories are taken at all store locations for substantially all merchandise categories approximately three weeks before the end of the fiscal year. Shrinkage is estimated as a percentage of sales at interim periods and for this approximate three-week period, based on historical shrinkage rates.
The Company receives certain allowances from various vendors in support of the merchandise it purchases for resale. The Company receives certain allowances as reimbursement for markdowns taken and/or to support the gross margins earned in connection with the sales of merchandise. These allowances are generally credited to cost of sales at the time the merchandise is sold in accordance with ASC Subtopic 605-50, Customer Payments and Incentives. The Company also receives advertising allowances from more than 1,000 of its merchandise vendors pursuant to cooperative advertising programs, with some vendors participating in multiple programs. These allowances represent reimbursements by vendors of costs incurred by the Company to promote the vendors merchandise and are netted against advertising and promotional costs when the related costs are incurred in accordance with ASC Subtopic 605-50. Advertising allowances in excess of costs incurred are recorded as a reduction of merchandise costs and, ultimately, through cost of sales when the merchandise is sold.
Advertising and promotional costs, net of cooperative advertising allowances, amounted to $1,072 million for 2010, $1,087 million for 2009 and $1,239 million for 2008. Cooperative advertising allowances that offset advertising and promotional costs were approximately $345 million for 2010, $298 million for 2009 and $372 million for 2008. Department store non-direct response advertising and promotional costs are expensed either as incurred or the first time the advertising occurs. Direct response advertising and promotional costs are deferred and expensed over the period during which the sales are expected to occur, generally one to four months.
The arrangements pursuant to which the Companys vendors provide allowances, while binding, are generally informal in nature and one year or less in duration. The terms and conditions of these arrangements vary significantly from vendor to vendor and are influenced by, among other things, the type of merchandise to be supported.
Depreciation of owned properties is provided primarily on a straight-line basis over the estimated asset lives, which range from fifteen to fifty years for buildings and building equipment and three to fifteen years for fixtures and equipment. Real estate taxes and interest on construction in progress and land under development are capitalized. Amounts capitalized are amortized over the estimated lives of the related depreciable assets. The Company receives contributions from developers and merchandise vendors to fund building improvement and the construction of vendor shops. Such contributions are netted against the capital expenditures.
Buildings on leased land and leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their economic lives or the lease term, beginning on the date the asset is put into use. The Company receives contributions from landlords to fund buildings and leasehold improvements. Such contributions are recorded as deferred rent and amortized as reductions to lease expense over the lease term.
The Company recognizes operating lease minimum rentals on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Executory costs such as real estate taxes and maintenance, and contingent rentals such as those based on a percentage of sales are recognized as incurred.
The lease term, which includes all renewal periods that are considered to be reasonably assured, begins on the date the Company has access to the leased property.
F-10
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The carrying value of long-lived assets is periodically reviewed by the Company whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential impairment has occurred. For long-lived assets held for use, a potential impairment has occurred if projected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets. The estimate of cash flows includes managements assumptions of cash inflows and outflows directly resulting from the use of those assets in operations. When a potential impairment has occurred, an impairment write-down is recorded if the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. The Company believes its estimated cash flows are sufficient to support the carrying value of its long-lived assets. If estimated cash flows significantly differ in the future, the Company may be required to record asset impairment write-downs.
If the Company commits to a plan to dispose of a long-lived asset before the end of its previously estimated useful life, estimated cash flows are revised accordingly, and the Company may be required to record an asset impairment write-down. Additionally, related liabilities arise such as severance, contractual obligations and other accruals associated with store closings from decisions to dispose of assets. The Company estimates these liabilities based on the facts and circumstances in existence for each restructuring decision. The amounts the Company will ultimately realize or disburse could differ from the amounts assumed in arriving at the asset impairment and restructuring charge recorded.
The Company classifies certain long-lived assets as held for disposal by sale and ceases depreciation when the particular criteria for such classification are met, including the probable sale within one year. For long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, an impairment charge is recorded if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value less costs to sell. Such valuations include estimations of fair values and incremental direct costs to transact a sale.
The carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed at least annually for possible impairment in accordance with ASC Subtopic 350-20 Goodwill. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives have been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing. The reporting units are the Companys retail operating divisions. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually at the end of the fiscal month of May. The Company estimates fair value based on discounted cash flows. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step is a comparison of each reporting units fair value to its carrying value. The reporting units discounted cash flows require significant management judgment with respect to sales, gross margin and SG&A rates, capital expenditures and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate. The projected sales, gross margin and SG&A expense rate assumptions and capital expenditures are based on the Companys annual business plan or other forecasted results. Discount rates reflect market-based estimates of the risks associated with the projected cash flows directly resulting from the use of those assets in operations. The estimates of fair value of reporting units are based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value in the first step, a second step is performed, in which the reporting units goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. The second step requires the Company to allocate the fair value of the reporting unit derived in the first step to the fair value of the reporting units net assets, with any fair value in excess of amounts allocated to such net assets representing the implied fair value of goodwill for that reporting unit. If the carrying value of an individual indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, such individual indefinite-lived intangible asset is written down by an amount equal to such excess.
The Company capitalizes purchased and internally developed software and amortizes such costs to expense on a straight-line basis over two to five years. Capitalized software is included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
F-11
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Historically, the Company offered both expiring and non-expiring gift cards to its customers. At the time gift cards are sold, no revenue is recognized; rather, the Company records an accrued liability to customers. The liability is relieved and revenue is recognized equal to the amount redeemed at the time gift cards are redeemed for merchandise. The Company records income from unredeemed gift cards (breakage) as a reduction of SG&A expenses. For expiring gift cards, income is recorded at the end of two years (expiration date) when there is no longer a legal obligation. For non-expiring gift cards, income is recorded in proportion and over the time period gift cards are actually redeemed. At least three years of historical data, updated annually, is used to determine actual redemption patterns. Since February 2, 2008, the Company sells only non-expiring gift cards.
The Company, through its insurance subsidiaries, is self-insured for workers compensation and general liability claims up to certain maximum liability amounts. Although the amounts accrued are actuarially determined based on analysis of historical trends of losses, settlements, litigation costs and other factors, the amounts the Company will ultimately disburse could differ from such accrued amounts.
The Company, through its actuaries, utilizes assumptions when estimating the liabilities for pension and other employee benefit plans. These assumptions, where applicable, include the discount rates used to determine the actuarial present value of projected benefit obligations, the rate of increase in future compensation levels, the long-term rate of return on assets and the growth in health care costs. The cost of these benefits is recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements over an employees term of service with the Company, and the accrued benefits are reported in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, as appropriate.
Financing costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the life of the related debt.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred income tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized.
The Company changed its methodology for recording deferred state income taxes from a blended rate basis to a separate entity basis, and has reflected the effects of such change to 2010 and all prior periods. Even though the Company considers the change to have had only an immaterial impact on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the prior periods as previously reported have been adjusted to reflect the change.
The Company records derivative transactions according to the provisions of ASC Topic 815 Derivatives and Hedging, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities and requires recognition of all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measurement of those instruments at fair value. The Company makes limited use of derivative financial instruments. The Company does not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and is not a party to any leveraged financial instruments. On the date that the Company enters into a derivative contract, the Company designates the derivative instrument as either a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or as a free-standing derivative instrument, each of which would receive different accounting treatment. Prior to entering into a hedge transaction, the
F-12
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Company formally documents the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. Derivative instruments that the Company may use as part of its interest rate risk management strategy include interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements and Treasury lock agreements. At January 29, 2011, the Company was not a party to any derivative financial instruments.
The Company records stock-based compensation expense according to the provisions of ASC Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation. ASC Topic 718 requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. Under the provisions of ASC Topic 718, the Company must determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments and the amortization method for compensation cost. See Note 13, Stock Based Compensation, for further information.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, which provides amendments and requires new disclosures relating to ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and also conforming amendments to guidance relating to ASC Topic 715, Compensation Retirement Benefits. The Company adopted this guidance on January 31, 2010, except for the disclosure requirement regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which the Company adopted on January 30, 2011. This guidance is limited to the form and content of disclosures, and the portion thereof that has been adopted did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company does not anticipate that the full adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2010-20, which amends various sections of ASC Topic 310, Receivables, relating to a companys allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. The amendment requires companies to provide disaggregated levels of disclosure by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable to enable users of the financial statements to understand the nature of credit risk, how the risk is analyzed in determining the related allowance for credit losses and changes to the allowance during the reporting period. The Company adopted this guidance as of January 29, 2011, except as it relates to disclosures regarding activities during a reporting period, which is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 31, 2010. This guidance is limited to the form and content of disclosures. The initial adoption did not have, and the full adoption is not expected to have, an impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2010-28, which amends ASC Topic 350, Goodwill and Other, relating to the goodwill impairment test of a reporting unit with zero or negative carrying amounts. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
F-13
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. | Impairments, Store Closing Costs and Division Consolidation Costs |
Impairments, store closing costs, and division consolidation costs consist of the following:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||
Impairments: |
||||||||||||
Properties held and used |
$ | 18 | $ | 115 | $ | 136 | ||||||
Acquired indefinite-lived private brand tradenames |
0 | 0 | 63 | |||||||||
Marketable securities |
0 | 0 | 12 | |||||||||
Store closing costs: |
||||||||||||
Severance |
1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||
Other |
6 | 4 | 7 | |||||||||
Division consolidation costs |
0 | 270 | 176 | |||||||||
$ | 25 | $ | 391 | $ | 398 | |||||||
Long-lived assets held for use are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability of long-lived assets is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of those assets in operation. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of the asset. When an impairment loss is recognized, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value. As a result of the Companys projected undiscounted future cash flows related to certain store locations being less than the carrying value of those assets, the Company recorded the impairment charges reflected in the table above relating to properties held and used, including properties that were the subject of announced store closings. The fair values of these locations were calculated based on the projected cash flows and an estimated risk-adjusted rate of return that would be used by market participants in valuing these assets or based on prices of similar assets.
During January 2011, the Company announced the closure of three underperforming Macys stores; during January 2010, the Company announced the closure of five underperforming Macys stores; and during January 2009, the Company announced the closure of eleven underperforming Macys stores. In connection with these announcements and the plans to dispose of these locations, the Company incurred severance costs and other costs related to lease obligations and other store liabilities. For 2010, these costs also included a loss on the sale of one property to be disposed.
The following table shows for 2010, 2009 and 2008, the beginning and ending balance of, and the activity associated with, the severance accruals established in connection with announced store closings:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
$ | 2 | $ | 4 | $ | 0 | ||||||
Charged to store closing costs |
1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||
Payments |
(2 | ) | (4 | ) | 0 | |||||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 1 | $ | 2 | $ | 4 | ||||||
The Company expects to pay out the 2010 accrued severance costs, which are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, prior to April 30, 2011.
F-14
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In February 2008, the Company began a localization initiative called My Macys. This initiative was intended to strengthen local market focus and enhance selling service in an effort to both accelerate same-store sales growth and reduce expenses. To maximize the results from My Macys, the Company took action, initially in selected markets, that: concentrated more management talent in local markets, effectively reducing the span of control over local stores; created new positions in the field to work with planning and buying executives in helping to understand and act on the merchandise needs of local customers; and empowered locally based executives to make more and better decisions. In combination with the localization initiative, the Company consolidated the Minneapolis-based Macys North organization into New York-based Macys East, the St. Louis-based Macys Midwest organization into Atlanta-based Macys South and the Seattle-based Macys Northwest organization into San Francisco based Macys West. The Atlanta-based division was renamed Macys Central.
In February 2009, the Company announced the expansion of the My Macys localization initiative across the country. As My Macys was rolled out nationally to new local markets in 2009, the Companys Macys branded stores were reorganized into a unified operating structure, through division consolidations, to support the Macys business. Division central office organizations were eliminated in New York-based Macys East, San Francisco-based Macys West, Atlanta-based Macys Central and Miami-based Macys Florida. The New York-based Macys Home Store and Macys Corporate Marketing divisions no longer exist as separate entities. Home Store functions were integrated into the Macys national merchandising, merchandise planning, stores and marketing organizations. Macys Corporate Marketing was integrated into the new unified marketing organization. The New York-based Macys Merchandising Group was refocused solely on the design, development and marketing of the Macys family of private brands.
The costs and expenses associated with the division consolidations and localization initiatives consisted primarily of severance costs and other human resource-related costs.
The following table shows for 2010, 2009 and 2008, the beginning and ending balance of, and the activity associated with, the severance accruals established in connection with the division consolidations and localization initiatives:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
$ | 69 | $ | 30 | $ | 0 | ||||||
Charged to division consolidation costs |
0 | 166 | 99 | |||||||||
Payments |
(69 | ) | (127 | ) | (69 | ) | ||||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 0 | $ | 69 | $ | 30 | ||||||
The Company performed both an annual and an interim impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets during 2008 (see Note 3, Goodwill Impairment Charges). As a result of the then-current economic environment and expectations regarding future operating performance of the Karen Scott, John Ashford and Frango private brand tradenames, it was determined that the carrying values exceeded the estimated fair values, which were based on discounted cash flows, and management concluded that asset impairment charges were required.
The Company accounts for its investment in available-for-sale marketable equity securities with unrealized gains and losses being included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. During 2008, based on the then-current economic environment, it was determined that the carrying value of certain marketable equity securities exceeded the current fair value on an other-than-temporary basis, and the previously unrecognized losses in accumulated other comprehensive income were reclassified into the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
F-15
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
3. | Goodwill Impairment Charges |
The Company reviews the carrying value of its goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives at least annually for possible impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives have been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing. The reporting units are the Companys retail operating divisions. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually at the end of the fiscal month of May. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step involves estimating the fair value of each reporting unit based on its estimated discounted cash flows and comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If this comparison indicates that a reporting units estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, a second step is required. If applicable, the second step requires the Company to allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to the estimated fair value of the reporting units net assets, with any fair value in excess of amounts allocated to such net assets representing the implied fair value of goodwill for that reporting unit. If the carrying value of an individual indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, such individual indefinite-lived intangible asset is written down by an amount equal to such excess.
The Company uses judgment in assessing whether assets may have become impaired between annual impairment tests. The occurrence of a change in circumstances, such as continued adverse business conditions or other economic factors, would determine the need for impairment testing between annual impairment tests. Due to deterioration in the general economic environment in 2008 (and the impact thereof on the Companys then-most recently completed annual business plan) and the resultant decline in the Companys market capitalization, the Company believed that an additional goodwill impairment test was required as of January 31, 2009. In performing the first step of this impairment test, the Company estimated the fair value of its reporting units by discounting their projected future cash flows to present value, and reconciling the aggregate estimated fair value of the Companys reporting units to the trading value of the Companys common stock (together with an implied control premium). The Company believes that this reconciliation process represents a market participant approach to valuation. Based on this analysis, the Company determined that the carrying value of each of the Companys reporting units exceeded its fair value at January 31, 2009, which resulted in all of the Companys reporting units failing the first step of the goodwill impairment test. The Company then undertook the second step of the goodwill impairment test, which involved, among other things, obtaining third-party appraisals of substantially all of the Companys tangible and intangible assets. Based on the results of its goodwill impairment testing as of January 31, 2009, the Company recorded a pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of $5,382 million ($5,083 million after income taxes) in the fourth quarter of 2008. As a result of the 2008 goodwill impairment charge, Macys is the only retail operating division with goodwill.
Based on the results of the most recent annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets completed during the second quarter of 2010, the Company determined that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets were not impaired as of May 29, 2010 and the estimated fair value of the Macys reporting unit substantially exceeded its carrying value.
The goodwill impairment testing process involves the use of significant assumptions, estimates and judgments by management, and is subject to inherent uncertainties and subjectivity. Estimating a reporting units discounted cash flows involves the use of significant assumptions, estimates and judgments with respect to a variety of factors, including sales, gross margin and SG&A rates, capital expenditures, cash flows and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate. Projected sales, gross margin and expense rate assumptions and capital expenditures are based on the Companys business plan or other forecasted results. Discount rates reflect market-based estimates of the risks associated with the projected cash flows of the reporting unit directly resulting from the use of its assets in its operations. The allocation of the estimated fair value of the Companys reporting units to the estimated fair value of their net assets also involves the use of significant assumptions,
F-16
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
estimates and judgments. Both the estimates of the fair value of the Companys reporting units and the allocation of the estimated fair value of the reporting units to their net assets are based on the best information available to the Companys management as of the date of the assessment.
The use of different assumptions, estimates or judgments in either step of the goodwill impairment testing process, including with respect to the estimated future cash flows of the Companys reporting units, the discount rate used to discount such estimated cash flows to their net present value, the reasonableness of the resultant implied control premium relative to the Companys market capitalization, and the appraised fair value of the reporting units tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, could materially increase or decrease the fair value of the reporting unit and/or its net assets and, accordingly, could materially increase or decrease any related impairment charge.
4. | Receivables |
Receivables were $392 million at January 29, 2011, compared to $358 million at January 30, 2010.
In connection with the sales of credit card accounts and related receivable balances, the Company and Citibank entered into a long-term marketing and servicing alliance pursuant to the terms of a Credit Card Program Agreement (the Program Agreement) with an initial term of 10 years expiring on July 17, 2016 and, unless terminated by either party as of the expiration of the initial term, an additional renewal term of three years. The Program Agreement provides for, among other things, (i) the ownership by Citibank of the accounts purchased by Citibank, (ii) the ownership by Citibank of new accounts opened by the Companys customers, (iii) the provision of credit by Citibank to the holders of the credit cards associated with the foregoing accounts, (iv) the servicing of the foregoing accounts, and (v) the allocation between Citibank and the Company of the economic benefits and burdens associated with the foregoing and other aspects of the alliance.
Pursuant to the Program Agreement, the Company continues to provide certain servicing functions related to the accounts and related receivables owned by Citibank and receives compensation from Citibank for these services. The amounts earned under the Program Agreement related to the servicing functions are deemed adequate compensation and, accordingly, no servicing asset or liability has been recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Amounts received under the Program Agreement were $528 million for 2010, $525 million for 2009 and $594 million for 2008, and are treated as reductions of SG&A expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Companys earnings from credit operations, net of servicing expenses, were $332 million for 2010, $323 million for 2009, and $372 million for 2008.
5. | Inventories |
Merchandise inventories were $4,758 million at January 29, 2011, compared to $4,615 million at January 30, 2010. At these dates, the cost of inventories using the LIFO method approximated the cost of such inventories using the FIFO method. The application of the LIFO method did not impact cost of sales for 2010, 2009 or 2008.
F-17
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. | Properties and Leases |
January 29, 2011 |
January 30, 2010 |
|||||||
(millions) | ||||||||
Land |
$ | 1,702 | $ | 1,719 | ||||
Buildings on owned land |
5,148 | 5,160 | ||||||
Buildings on leased land and leasehold improvements |
2,227 | 2,232 | ||||||
Fixtures and equipment |
5,752 | 6,129 | ||||||
Leased properties under capitalized leases |
33 | 49 | ||||||
14,862 | 15,289 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
6,049 | 5,782 | ||||||
$ | 8,813 | $ | 9,507 | |||||
In connection with various shopping center agreements, the Company is obligated to operate certain stores within the centers for periods of up to twenty years. Some of these agreements require that the stores be operated under a particular name.
The Company leases a portion of the real estate and personal property used in its operations. Most leases require the Company to pay real estate taxes, maintenance and other executory costs; some also require additional payments based on percentages of sales and some contain purchase options. Certain of the Companys real estate leases have terms that extend for significant numbers of years and provide for rental rates that increase or decrease over time. In addition, certain of these leases contain covenants that restrict the ability of the tenant (typically a subsidiary of the Company) to take specified actions (including the payment of dividends or other amounts on account of its capital stock) unless the tenant satisfies certain financial tests.
Minimum rental commitments (excluding executory costs) at January 29, 2011, for noncancellable leases are:
Capitalized Leases |
Operating Leases |
Total | ||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||
Fiscal year: |
||||||||||||
2011 |
$ | 6 | $ | 245 | $ | 251 | ||||||
2012 |
6 | 233 | 239 | |||||||||
2013 |
4 | 213 | 217 | |||||||||
2014 |
4 | 190 | 194 | |||||||||
2015 |
3 | 150 | 153 | |||||||||
After 2015 |
35 | 1,581 | 1,616 | |||||||||
Total minimum lease payments |
58 | $ | 2,612 | $ | 2,670 | |||||||
Less amount representing interest |
25 | |||||||||||
Present value of net minimum capitalized lease payments |
$ | 33 | ||||||||||
Capitalized leases are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as property and equipment while the related obligation is included in short-term ($3 million) and long-term ($30 million) debt. Amortization of assets subject to capitalized leases is included in depreciation and amortization expense. Total minimum lease payments shown above have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of approximately $80 million on operating leases.
F-18
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company is a guarantor with respect to certain lease obligations associated with The May Department Stores Company and previously disposed subsidiaries or businesses. The leases, one of which includes potential extensions to 2070, have future minimum lease payments aggregating approximately $389 million and are offset by payments from existing tenants and subtenants. In addition, the Company is liable for other expenses related to the above leases, such as property taxes and common area maintenance, which are also payable by existing tenants and subtenants. Potential liabilities related to these guarantees are subject to certain defenses by the Company. The Company believes that the risk of significant loss from the guarantees of these lease obligations is remote.
Rental expense consists of:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||
Real estate (excluding executory costs) |
||||||||||||
Capitalized leases |
||||||||||||
Contingent rentals |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 1 | ||||||
Operating leases |
||||||||||||
Minimum rentals |
234 | 230 | 230 | |||||||||
Contingent rentals |
16 | 15 | 16 | |||||||||
250 | 245 | 247 | ||||||||||
Less income from subleases |
||||||||||||
Operating leases |
(15 | ) | (16 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||
$ | 235 | $ | 229 | $ | 232 | |||||||
Personal property Operating leases |
$ | 10 | $ | 12 | $ | 19 | ||||||
Included as a reduction to the expense above is deferred rent amortization of $7 million, $7 million and $6 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to contributions received from landlords.
F-19
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. | Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
The following summarizes the Companys goodwill and other intangible assets:
January 29, 2011 |
January 30, 2010 |
|||||||
(millions) | ||||||||
Non-amortizing intangible assets |
||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 9,125 | $ | 9,125 | ||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
(5,382 | ) | (5,382 | ) | ||||
3,743 | 3,743 | |||||||
Tradenames |
414 | 414 | ||||||
$ | 4,157 | $ | 4,157 | |||||
Amortizing intangible assets |
||||||||
Favorable leases |
$ | 250 | $ | 256 | ||||
Customer relationships |
188 | 188 | ||||||
438 | 444 | |||||||
Accumulated amortization |
||||||||
Favorable leases |
(113 | ) | (97 | ) | ||||
Customer relationships |
(102 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||
(215 | ) | (180 | ) | |||||
$ | 223 | $ | 264 | |||||
During 2008, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge based on the results of goodwill impairment testing as of January 31, 2009. See Note 3, Goodwill Impairment Charges, for further information. Also during 2008, the Company recorded an impairment charge associated with acquired indefinite-lived private brand tradenames. See Note 2, Impairments, Store Closing Costs and Division Consolidation Costs, for further information.
Intangible amortization expense amounted to $41 million for 2010, $41 million for 2009 and $42 million for 2008.
Future estimated intangible amortization expense is shown below:
(millions) | ||||
Fiscal year: |
||||
2011 |
$ | 39 | ||
2012 |
37 | |||
2013 |
34 | |||
2014 |
31 | |||
2015 |
21 |
Favorable lease intangible assets are being amortized over their respective lease terms (weighted average life of approximately twelve years) and customer relationship intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of ten years.
F-20
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
8. | Financing |
The Companys debt is as follows:
January 29, 2011 |
January 30, 2010 |
|||||||
(millions) | ||||||||
Short-term debt: |
||||||||
6.625% Senior notes due 2011 |
$ | 330 | $ | 0 | ||||
7.45% Senior debentures due 2011 |
109 | 0 | ||||||
10.625% Senior debentures due 2010 |
0 | 150 | ||||||
8.5% Senior notes due 2010 |
0 | 76 | ||||||
Capital lease and current portion of other long-term obligations |
15 | 16 | ||||||
$ | 454 | $ | 242 | |||||
Long-term debt: |
||||||||
5.9% Senior notes due 2016 |
$ | 977 | $ | 1,100 | ||||
5.35% Senior notes due 2012 |
616 | 1,100 | ||||||
7.875% Senior notes due 2015 * |
612 | 650 | ||||||
6.375% Senior notes due 2037 |
500 | 500 | ||||||
5.75% Senior notes due 2014 |
453 | 500 | ||||||
6.9% Senior debentures due 2029 |
400 | 400 | ||||||
6.7% Senior debentures due 2034 |
400 | 400 | ||||||
7.45% Senior debentures due 2017 |
300 | 300 | ||||||
6.65% Senior debentures due 2024 |
300 | 300 | ||||||
7.0% Senior debentures due 2028 |
300 | 300 | ||||||
5.875% Senior notes due 2013 |
298 | 350 | ||||||
6.9% Senior debentures due 2032 |
250 | 250 | ||||||
6.7% Senior debentures due 2028 |
200 | 200 | ||||||
8.0% Senior debentures due 2012 |
173 | 200 | ||||||
6.79% Senior debentures due 2027 |
165 | 165 | ||||||
7.45% Senior debentures due 2016 |
123 | 125 | ||||||
7.625% Senior debentures due 2013 |
109 | 125 | ||||||
7.875% Senior debentures due 2036 |
108 | 108 | ||||||
7.5% Senior debentures due 2015 |
100 | 100 | ||||||
8.125% Senior debentures due 2035 |
76 | 76 | ||||||
8.75% Senior debentures due 2029 |
61 | 61 | ||||||
9.5% amortizing debentures due 2021 |
37 | 41 | ||||||
8.5% Senior debentures due 2019 |
36 | 36 | ||||||
10.25% Senior debentures due 2021 |
33 | 33 | ||||||
7.6% Senior debentures due 2025 |
24 | 24 | ||||||
9.75% amortizing debentures due 2021 |
20 | 22 | ||||||
7.875% Senior debentures due 2030 |
18 | 18 | ||||||
6.625% Senior notes due 2011 |
0 | 500 | ||||||
7.45% Senior debentures due 2011 |
0 | 150 | ||||||
Premium on acquired debt, using an effective |
239 | 275 | ||||||
Capital lease and other long-term obligations |
43 | 47 | ||||||
$ | 6,971 | $ | 8,456 | |||||
* | The rate of interest payable in respect of these senior notes was increased by one percent per annum to 8.875% in April 2009 as a result of a downgrade of the notes by specified rating agencies and was decreased by 0.50 percent per annum to 8.375% effective in May 2010 as a result of an upgrade of the notes by specified rating agencies. The rate of interest payable in respect of these senior notes could increase by up to 1.50 percent per annum or decrease by up to 0.50 percent per annum from its current level in the event of one or more downgrades or upgrades of the notes by specified rating agencies. |
F-21
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Interest expense is as follows:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||
Interest on debt |
$ | 535 | $ | 587 | $ | 621 | ||||||
Premium on early retirement of long-term debt |
66 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Amortization of debt premium |
(31 | ) | (33 | ) | (34 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of financing costs |
11 | 10 | 7 | |||||||||
Interest on capitalized leases |
3 | 3 | 5 | |||||||||
584 | 567 | 599 | ||||||||||
Less interest capitalized on construction |
5 | 5 | 11 | |||||||||
$ | 579 | $ | 562 | $ | 588 | |||||||
Future maturities of long-term debt, other than capitalized leases and premium on acquired debt, are shown below:
(millions) | ||||
Fiscal year: |
||||
2012 |
$ | 1,098 | ||
2013 |
121 | |||
2014 |
461 | |||
2015 |
718 | |||
2016 |
1,105 | |||
After 2016 |
3,199 |
During 2010, consistent with its strategy to reduce indebtedness, the Company used approximately $1,067 million of cash to repurchase approximately $1,000 million of indebtedness prior to maturity. In connection with these repurchases, the Company recognized additional interest expense of approximately $66 million in 2010 due to the expenses associated with the early retirement of this debt.
In 2009, the Company completed a cash tender offer pursuant to which it purchased approximately $680 million of its outstanding debt for aggregate consideration, including accrued and unpaid interest, of approximately $686 million.
On June 23, 2008, the Company issued $650 million aggregate principal amount of 7.875% senior notes due 2015. The net proceeds of the debt issuance were used for the repayment of amounts due on debt maturing in 2008.
F-22
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table shows the detail of debt repayments:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||
10.625% Senior debentures due 2010 |
$ | 150 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||
8.5% Senior notes due 2010 |
76 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
6.625% Senior notes due 2011 |
170 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
7.45% Senior debentures due 2011 |
41 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
5.35% Senior notes due 2012 |
484 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
8.0% Senior debentures due 2012 |
27 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
5.875% Senior notes due 2013 |
52 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
7.625% Senior debentures due 2013 |
16 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
5.75% Senior notes due 2014 |
47 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
7.875% Senior notes due 2015 |
38 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
5.90% Senior notes due 2016 |
123 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
7.45% Senior debentures due 2016 |
2 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
4.8% Senior notes due 2009 |
0 | 600 | 0 | |||||||||
6.3% Senior notes due 2009 |
0 | 350 | 0 | |||||||||
6.625% Senior notes due 2008 |
0 | 0 | 500 | |||||||||
5.95% Senior notes due 2008 |
0 | 0 | 150 | |||||||||
9.5% amortizing debentures due 2021 |
4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||
9.75% amortizing debentures due 2021 |
2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
Capital leases and other obligations |
13 | 10 | 10 | |||||||||
$ | 1,245 | $ | 966 | $ | 666 | |||||||
The following summarizes certain components of the Companys debt:
Bank Credit Agreement
The Company is a party to a credit agreement with certain financial institutions providing for revolving credit borrowings and letters of credit in an aggregate amount not to exceed $2,000 million (which amount may be increased to $2,500 million at the option of the Company, subject to the willingness of existing or new lenders to provide commitments for such additional financing) outstanding at any particular time. This credit agreement is set to expire August 30, 2012.
As of January 29, 2011, and January 30, 2010, there were no revolving credit loans outstanding under the credit agreement. However, there were less than $1 million and approximately $52 million, respectively, of standby letters of credit outstanding at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010. There were no borrowings under this agreement throughout all of 2010 and 2009. Revolving loans under the credit agreement bear interest based on various published rates.
This agreement, which is an obligation of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Macys, Inc. (Parent), is not secured. However, Parent and each direct and indirect subsidiary of such wholly owned subsidiary of Macys, Inc. have fully and unconditionally guaranteed this obligation, subject to specified limitations.
The Companys interest coverage ratio for 2010 was 5.64 and its leverage ratio at January 29, 2011 was 2.34, in each case as calculated in accordance with the credit agreement. The credit agreement requires the
F-23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Company to maintain a specified interest coverage ratio for the latest four quarters of no less than 3.25 and a specified leverage ratio as of and for the latest four quarters of no more than 4.50. The interest coverage ratio is defined as EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) over net interest expense and the leverage ratio is defined as debt over EBITDA. For purposes of these calculations EBITDA is calculated as net income plus interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash impairment of goodwill, intangibles and real estate, non-recurring cash charges not to exceed in the aggregate $500 million from the date of the amended agreement and extraordinary losses less interest income and non-recurring or extraordinary gains. Debt and net interest are adjusted to exclude the premium on acquired debt and the resulting amortization, respectively.
A breach of a restrictive covenant in the Companys credit agreement or the inability of the Company to maintain the financial ratios described above could result in an event of default under the credit agreement. In addition, an event of default would occur under the credit agreement if any indebtedness of the Company in excess of an aggregate principal amount of $150 million becomes due prior to its stated maturity or the holders of such indebtedness become able to cause it to become due prior to its stated maturity. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lenders could, subject to the terms and conditions of the credit agreement, elect to declare the outstanding principal, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. Moreover, most of the Companys senior notes and debentures contain cross-default provisions based on the non-payment at maturity, or other default after an applicable grace period, of any other debt, the unpaid principal amount of which is not less than $100 million that could be triggered by an event of default under the credit agreement. In such an event, the Companys senior notes and debentures that contain cross-default provisions would also be subject to acceleration.
Commercial Paper
The Company is a party to a $2,000 million unsecured commercial paper program. The Company may issue and sell commercial paper in an aggregate amount outstanding at any particular time not to exceed its then-current combined borrowing availability under the bank credit agreement described above. The issuance of commercial paper will have the effect, while such commercial paper is outstanding, of reducing the Companys borrowing capacity under the bank credit agreement by an amount equal to the principal amount of such commercial paper. The Company had no commercial paper outstanding under its commercial paper program throughout all of 2010 and 2009.
This program, which is an obligation of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Macys, Inc., is not secured. However, Parent has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations.
Senior Notes and Debentures
The senior notes and the senior debentures are unsecured obligations of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Macys, Inc. and Parent has fully and unconditionally guaranteed these obligations (see Note 18, Condensed Consolidating Financial Information).
Other Financing Arrangements
At January 29, 2011, the Company had dedicated approximately $52 million of cash, included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, which is used to collateralize the Companys issuances of standby letters of credit. There were approximately $38 million of other standby letters of credit outstanding at January 29, 2011 and none outstanding at January 30, 2010.
F-24
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
9. | Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities |
January 29, 2011 |
January 30, 2010 |
|||||||
(millions) | ||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 559 | $ | 484 | ||||
Gift cards and customer award certificates |
654 | 594 | ||||||
Accrued wages and vacation |
311 | 307 | ||||||
Lease related liabilities |
271 | 265 | ||||||
Taxes other than income taxes |
186 | 199 | ||||||
Current portion of workers compensation and general liability reserves |
144 | 141 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
98 | 122 | ||||||
Current portion of post employment and postretirement benefits |
88 | 94 | ||||||
Allowance for future sales returns |
67 | 65 | ||||||
Severance and relocation |
1 | 71 | ||||||
Other |
265 | 284 | ||||||
$ | 2,644 | $ | 2,626 | |||||
Adjustments to the allowance for future sales returns, which amounted to a charge of $2 million for 2010, a charge of $6 million for 2009, and a credit of $14 million for 2008 are reflected in cost of sales.
Changes in workers compensation and general liability reserves, including the current portion, are as follows:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
$ | 478 | $ | 495 | $ | 471 | ||||||
Charged to costs and expenses |
148 | 124 | 164 | |||||||||
Payments, net of recoveries |
(138 | ) | (141 | ) | (140 | ) | ||||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 488 | $ | 478 | $ | 495 | ||||||
The non-current portion of workers compensation and general liability reserves is included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, workers compensation and general liability reserves included $93 million and $90 million, respectively, of liabilities which are covered by deposits and receivables included in current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
10. | Taxes |
The Company changed its methodology for recording deferred state income taxes from a blended rate basis to a separate entity basis, and has reflected the effects of such change to 2010 and all prior periods. Even though the Company considers the change to have had only an immaterial impact on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the prior periods as previously reported have been adjusted to reflect the change.
F-25
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income tax expense (benefit) is as follows:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current | Deferred | Total | Current | Deferred | Total | Current | Deferred | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 217 | $ | 234 | $ | 451 | $ | 48 | $ | 84 | $ | 132 | $ | 6 | $ | (109 | ) | $ | (103 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
State and local |
12 | 10 | 22 | 9 | 37 | 46 | 8 | (68 | ) | (60 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 229 | $ | 244 | $ | 473 | $ | 57 | $ | 121 | $ | 178 | $ | 14 | $ | (177 | ) | $ | (163 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
The income tax expense (benefit) reported differs from the expected tax computed by applying the federal income tax statutory rate of 35% for 2010, 2009 and 2008 to income (loss) before income taxes. The reasons for this difference and their tax effects are as follows:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||
Expected tax |
$ | 462 | $ | 177 | $ | (1,728 | ) | |||||
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit |
14 | 30 | (40 | ) | ||||||||
Settlement of federal tax examinations |
0 | (21 | ) | 0 | ||||||||
Non-deductibility of goodwill impairment charges |
0 | 0 | 1,611 | |||||||||
Other |
(3 | ) | (8 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||
$ | 473 | $ | 178 | $ | (163 | ) | ||||||
During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company settled Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examinations for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006. As a result of the settlement, the Company recognized previously unrecognized tax benefits and related accrued interest, primarily attributable to the disposition of former subsidiaries.
F-26
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:
January 29, 2011 |
January 30, 2010 |
|||||||
(millions) | ||||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Post employment and postretirement benefits |
$ | 473 | $ | 667 | ||||
Accrued liabilities accounted for on a cash basis for tax purposes |
195 | 316 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
117 | 132 | ||||||
Unrecognized state tax benefits and accrued interest |
91 | 91 | ||||||
State operating loss carryforwards |
61 | 55 | ||||||
Other |
144 | 114 | ||||||
Valuation allowance |
(35 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||
Total deferred tax assets |
1,046 | 1,342 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Excess of book basis over tax basis of property and equipment |
(1,793 | ) | (1,919 | ) | ||||
Merchandise inventories |
(483 | ) | (456 | ) | ||||
Intangible assets |
(162 | ) | (129 | ) | ||||
Other |
(217 | ) | (184 | ) | ||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
(2,655 | ) | (2,688 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax liability |
$ | (1,609 | ) | $ | (1,346 | ) | ||
The valuation allowance at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 relates to net deferred tax assets for state net operating loss carryforwards. The net change in the valuation allowance amounted to an increase of $2 million for 2010 and no change for 2009.
As of January 29, 2011, the Company had no federal net operating loss carryforwards and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,301 million, which will expire between 2011 and 2031.
F-27
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
January 29, 2011 |
January 30, 2010 |
|||||||
(millions) | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 207 | $ | 237 | ||||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
19 | 23 | ||||||
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
(8 | ) | (34 | ) | ||||
Settlements |
(4 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Statute expirations |
(9 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 205 | $ | 207 | ||||
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at |
||||||||
Other liabilities |
$ | 170 | $ | 169 | ||||
Long-term deferred income taxes |
24 | 24 | ||||||
Current income taxes |
11 | 14 | ||||||
$ | 205 | $ | 207 | |||||
As of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits, net of deferred tax assets, that, if recognized would affect the effective income tax rate, was $133 million and $135 million, respectively.
The Company classifies unrecognized tax benefits not expected to be settled within one year as other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company classifies federal, state and local interest and penalties not expected to be settled within one year as other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and follows a policy of recognizing all interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. During 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized charges of $5 million, $4 million and $16 million, respectively, in income tax expense for federal, state and local interest and penalties.
The Company had approximately $80 million and $78 million accrued for the payment of federal, state and local interest and penalties at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, respectively. The accrued federal, state and local interest and penalties primarily relates to state tax issues and the amount of penalties paid in prior periods, and the amount of penalties accrued at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 are insignificant. At January 29, 2011, approximately $76 million of federal, state and local interest and penalties is included in other liabilities and $4 million is included in current income taxes on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007. With respect to state and local jurisdictions, with limited exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax audits for years before 2000. Although the outcome of tax audits is always uncertain, the Company believes that adequate amounts of tax, interest and penalties have been accrued for any adjustments that are expected to result from the years still subject to examination.
F-28
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
11. | Retirement Plans |
The Company has a funded defined benefit plan (Pension Plan) and a defined contribution plan (Retirement Plan) which cover substantially all employees who work 1,000 hours or more in a year. In addition, the Company has an unfunded defined benefit supplementary retirement plan (SERP), which provides benefits, for certain employees, in excess of qualified plan limitations.
Pension Plan
The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets, and funded status of the Pension Plan as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010:
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(millions) | ||||||||
Change in projected benefit obligation |
||||||||
Projected benefit obligation, beginning of year |
$ | 2,879 | $ | 2,444 | ||||
Service cost |
99 | 81 | ||||||
Interest cost |
158 | 173 | ||||||
Actuarial loss |
103 | 401 | ||||||
Benefits paid |
(215 | ) | (220 | ) | ||||
Projected benefit obligation, end of year |
$ | 3,024 | $ | 2,879 | ||||
Changes in plan assets |
||||||||
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year |
$ | 1,865 | $ | 1,438 | ||||
Actual return on plan assets |
329 | 277 | ||||||
Company contributions |
825 | 370 | ||||||
Benefits paid |
(215 | ) | (220 | ) | ||||
Fair value of plan assets, end of year |
$ | 2,804 | $ | 1,865 | ||||
Funded status at end of year |
$ | (220 | ) | $ | (1,014 | ) | ||
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at |
||||||||
Other liabilities |
$ | (220 | ) | $ | (1,014 | ) | ||
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss at January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 |
||||||||
Net actuarial loss |
$ | 1,116 | $ | 1,186 | ||||
Prior service credit |
(2 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,114 | $ | 1,183 | |||||
The accumulated benefit obligation for the Pension Plan was $2,791 million as of January 29, 2011 and $2,657 million as of January 30, 2010.
F-29
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net pension costs and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income for the Pension Plan included the following actuarially determined components:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(millions) | ||||||||||||
Net Periodic Pension Cost |
||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 99 | $ | 81 | $ | 97 | ||||||
Interest cost |
158 | 173 | 159 | |||||||||
Expected return on assets |
(218 | ) | (187 | ) | (192 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
61 | 0 | 5 | |||||||||
Amortization of prior service credit |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | 0 | |||||||
99 | 66 | 69 | ||||||||||
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Projected Benefit Obligation |
||||||||||||
Net actuarial (gain) loss |
(9 | ) | 311 | 604 | ||||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
(61 | ) | 0 | (5 | ) | |||||||
Amortization of prior service credit |
1 | 1 | 0 | |||||||||
(69 | ) | 312 |