Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant    ¨

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨          Preliminary Proxy Statement		¨      Confidential,for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x          Definitive Proxy Statement
¨          Definitive Additional Materials
¨          Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

SVB FINANCIAL GROUP

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

x

No fee required.

 

¨

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

5)

Total fee paid:

 

 

¨

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

¨

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

3)

Filing Party:

 

 

4)

Date Filed:

 

 

---

Table of Contents

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Thursday, April 21, 2016

4:30 P.M.

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS:

I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of SVB Financial Group, a Delaware corporation, which will be held at our offices located at 3005 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054, on Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 4:30 p.m., Pacific Time. The purposes of the meeting are to:

 

1.

Elect eleven (11) directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their successors are elected;

 

2.

Approve an amendment to the Company’s 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to reserve an additional 1,500,000 shares of common stock for issuance thereunder;

 

3.

Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;

 

4.

Approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation (“Say on Pay”); and

 

5.

Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice. To assure your representation at the meeting, you are encouraged to vote your shares as soon as possible. Voting instructions are included in: (i) for those stockholders receiving printed proxy materials, the enclosed Proxy Card, and (ii) for all other stockholders, the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (as further described in the Proxy Statement). Any stockholder attending the meeting may vote in person even if such stockholder has previously voted by proxy.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on February 23, 2016 may vote at the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

 

Santa Clara, California

March 3, 2016

 

---

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT—TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

		Page
SUMMARY INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT GENERAL INFORMATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
¡ Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors			2
Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters			13
Board Committees			16
Audit Committee Report			18
Compensation Committee Report			19
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation			19
Compensation for Directors			20
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions			22
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance			23
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND COMPENSATION
Information on Executive Officers			24
Compensation Discussion and Analysis			29
Compensation for Named Executive Officers			45
SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers			54
Security Ownership of Principal Stockholders			55
OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS
¡ Proposal No. 2 – Approval of Amendment to the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan			56
¡ Proposal No. 3 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			61
Principal Audit Fees and Services			61
¡ Proposal No. 4 – Advisory Approval of our Executive Compensation			62
MEETING AND OTHER INFORMATION
Information About Voting and Proxy Solicitation			63
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations			66
Copy of Bylaw Provisions			67
2015 Annual Report			67
Other Matters			67
APPENDIX A – Reconciliation of GAAP			A-1
APPENDIX B – 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan			B-1

 

 

¡	Indicates matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

 

i

 

---

Table of Contents

---

Table of Contents

---

Table of Contents

---

Table of Contents

---

Table of Contents

Mailed to Stockholders on or about March 10, 2016

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

OF

SVB FINANCIAL GROUP

3003 Tasman Drive

Santa Clara, California 95054

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT GENERAL INFORMATION

General

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by, and on behalf of, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of SVB Financial Group (the “Company”) for use at our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at our offices located at 3005 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054, on Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 4:30 p.m., Pacific Time, and at all postponements or adjournments thereof (the “Meeting”). (For directions to attend the Meeting in person, please contact us at the telephone number below.)

Record Date

Only stockholders of record on February 23, 2016 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to vote at the Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 51,629,096 shares of our common stock, $0.001 par value (the “Common Stock”), outstanding.

Principal Executive Offices

The Company is a Delaware corporation and financial holding company for Silicon Valley Bank (the “Bank”) and its affiliates. Our principal executive offices are located at 3003 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054, and our telephone number at that location is (408) 654-7400.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Meeting

This Proxy Statement and our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available electronically at www.svb.com/proxy. (The contents of the website are not incorporated herein by reference and the website address provided above and throughout this Proxy Statement is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.) See also “Information About Voting and Proxy Solicitation – Delivery of Proxy Materials” below.

 

1

    ^{PROXY STATEMENT INFORMATION}

---

Table of Contents

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal No. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “For” All Nominees

Our amended and restated bylaws (the “Bylaws”) require the Board of Directors to consist of at least eight (8), but no more than thirteen (13) members, with the exact number to be fixed by the Board of Directors. The number of directors authorized by the Board is currently fixed at eleven (11).

Our Board of Directors has nominated eleven (11) directors — ten (10) independent directors and the CEO — for election at this year’s Meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting. All of our incumbent directors are nominees for re-election to the Board and were recommended by the Governance Committee. All of the nominees, with the exception of Ms. Miller (who joined the Board in May 2015), served as directors of the Company since the last annual meeting of stockholders in April 2015, each of whom received the support of more than 99% of the votes cast at the 2015 Annual Meeting.

We believe that our director nominees, individually and together as a whole, possess the requisite skills, experience and qualifications necessary to create an effective Board to serve the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

 

Director Qualifications   The Board recognizes that it is of utmost importance to assemble a body of directors that, taken together, has the skills, qualifications, experience and attributes appropriate for functioning as a board, and working with management, effectively. The Governance Committee of the Board is responsible for maintaining a well-rounded and diverse board that has the requisite diversity of skills and qualifications to oversee the Company effectively. The Governance Committee has not formally established any minimum qualifications for director candidates. However, in light of our business, the primary areas of experience, qualifications and attributes sought by the Governance Committee in director candidates include, but are not limited to, the primary areas identified on the right and below.   The Board believes that our incumbent directors, as a whole, have these areas of experience and each possesses particular attributes which qualify him or her to serve on the Board, as further noted in his or her respective biography below. (For each director, we have highlighted certain key areas of qualifications. The fact that an area is not highlighted does not mean that the director does not possess such qualification.)				PRIMARY AREAS OF DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
				•      Client Industry – Experience with our key client industries — technology, life science/healthcare, venture capital/private equity and premium wine — to help deepen our knowledge of the innovation markets we do business in.   •      Banking/Financial Services – Experience with the banking or financial services industry, including regulatory experience, to support and grow our core business.   •      Global – Experience working outside of the United States and/or with global companies, to help our global expansion.   •      Leadership – Experience from holding significant leadership positions, including as a CEO of a successful company or a head of a significant business, to help us drive business strategy, growth and performance.   •      Finance/Accounting – Experience with finance, accounting, and/or financial reporting processes to help drive operating and financial performance.   •      Risk Management – Experience with key risk management functions to help oversee the risks we face.   •      Public Company – Experience working with publicly-traded companies and corporate governance issues.

 

KEY DIRECTOR ATTRIBUTES
•      Strong strategic and/or innovative thinking •      Integrity •      Collegial spirit •      Sound business judgment				•      Professionalism •      Ability to generate public confidence •      Ability to act independently •      Availability and commitment to serve

 

2

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

Nominees for Director

All proxies will be voted “FOR” the election of the following eleven (11) nominees recommended by the Board for a term of one year, unless authority to vote for the election of directors (or for any particular nominee) is withheld. If any of the nominees should unexpectedly decline or be unable to act as a director, the proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Board. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board has no reason to believe that any nominee will become unavailable and has no present intention to nominate persons in addition to or in lieu of those listed below. Our directors serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal.

Vote Required

Any nominee who receives a greater number of votes cast “for” his or her election than votes cast “withheld” his or her election will be elected.

Majority Voting Policy

The Governance Committee of our Board has adopted a majority voting policy applicable to uncontested director elections (i.e., elections where the number of nominees is not greater than the number of directors to be elected). Under this policy, any of our director nominees in an uncontested election who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall, promptly following certification of the stockholder vote, offer his or her resignation to the Board for consideration. The Governance Committee will act within 90 days after certification of the stockholder vote to determine whether to accept the director’s resignation, and thereafter submit such resignation and its recommendation to the Board for consideration at its next scheduled meeting. The Board expects that the director whose resignation is under consideration abstain from participating in any decision or deliberation regarding that resignation. Following the Board’s decision, we will publicly disclose the decision made with respect to any resignation.

Director Biographies

The biographical information for each of the director nominees is as follows:

 

Greg W. Becker		Board Committees:		Independent:
		N/A		No

Mr. Becker, age 48, was appointed the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank in April 2011. He first joined us in 1993 as part of the Northern California Technology Division, and since then, has served in a number of executive and senior management positions, including Division Manager of Venture Capital (1999-2002), Chief Banking Officer (2002-2003), Chief Operating Officer (2003-2008) and President of Silicon Valley Bank (since 2008). Mr. Becker was elected by stockholders as a director of the Company in April 2011.

 

Private Directorships:		•   Chairman, Silicon Valley Leadership Group, a non-profit organization with an emphasis on issues of importance to employers, employees and residents of Silicon Valley (since 2011)
Prior Directorships:		•   Bay Area Council, a public policy advocacy organization (2011-2015) (as director and executive committee member)
Other Prior Experience:		•   President, Board of Trustees, Silicon Valley and Monterey Bay Area Chapter of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (2004-2011)
Education:		•   Bachelor’s degree in Business from Indiana University

Skills/ Qualifications:		In particular, Mr. Becker’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:   •   Leadership – current role as the Company’s CEO, as well as held other prior leadership roles within the Company •   Client Industry and Banking/Financial Services – extensive experience with the Company and within the banking industry working with public and private technology, life science and venture capital clients

 

3

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

Eric A. Benhamou				Board Committees:		Independent:
				•     Governance, Chair •     Finance •     Risk		Yes

Mr. Benhamou, age 60, is Chairman and CEO of Benhamou Global Ventures, LLC, which he founded in 2003. Benhamou Global Ventures, LLC invests and plays an active role in innovative high tech firms throughout the world. He also sits on various public and private technology company boards, and serves a variety of educational and philanthropic organizations. Mr. Benhamou was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in February 2005 and was first elected by stockholders in April 2005.

 

Public Directorships:		•  Chairman, Cypress Semiconductor, a semiconductor company (since 1993) •  Finjan Corporation, a global provider of proactive web security solutions (since 2006)
Private Directorships:		•  Chairman, Ayehu, a developer of IT process automation products (since 2015) •  Grid Dynamics, a provider of commerce technology solutions for retailers (since 2015)
Other Experience:		•  Chairman of the Israel Venture Network, a venture philanthropy organization for a stronger Israeli society (since 2000)
Prior Directorships:		•  Qubell, an application deployment and configuration management platform (acquired by Grid Dynamics) (2014-2015) •  ConteXtream, a carrier equipment vendor for intellectual property based media services (acquired by Hewlett Packard) (2007-2015) •  Load Dynamix (formerly SwiftTest, Inc.), a commercial IP network testing tool developer (2010-2014) •  Purewave, Inc., a developer of outdoor compact base stations for the 4G marketplace (2010-2014) •  RealNetworks, Inc., creator of digital media services and software (2003-2012) •  Chairman, 3Com Corporation, a public networking solutions provider (1990-2010) •  Voltaire Ltd., a public grid computing network solutions company (2007-2011) •  Dasient, a security company that provides malware detection and prevention solutions (2010-2011) •  Chairman of the Board of Directors of Palm, Inc., a public mobile products provider (1999-2007) •  Other private directorships: Atrica, Go Networks, WisdomArk (various dates from 2000-2008)
Other Prior Experience:		•  Executive committee member, Stanford University School of Engineering (1996-2015) •  Visiting professor, IDC Business School (2001-2015) •  Executive committee member, Ben Gurion University of Negev (2000-2013) •  Visiting professor, INSEAD Business School (2003-2012) •  Interim Chief Executive Officer of Palm, Inc. (2001-2003) •  Chief Executive Officer, 3Com Corporation (1990-2000), and other various senior management positions •  Executive committee member, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB) (2003-2008) •  Member, US-Israel Science and Technology Commission (2003) •  Executive committee member, TechNet •  Co-founder and Vice President of Engineering, Bridge Communications (1981-1987)
Education:		•  Engineering degree from l’École Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers in Paris, France •  Master’s degree in Science from the School of Engineering at Stanford University •  Several honorary doctorates

Skills/ Qualifications:		In particular, Mr. Benhamou’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:   •  Client Industry – in-depth experience with both public and private technology companies (as part of management and/or as a director and venture capital investor); current role as Chairman and CEO of Benhamou Global Ventures •  Global – strategic and operational experience in the global markets, particularly in Europe and Israel •  Leadership – held a variety of key executive positions, including Chairman and CEO roles of 3Com Corporation and Palm, Inc.

 

4

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

David M. Clapper				Board Committees:		Independent:
				•     Credit, Chair •     Audit •     Risk		Yes

Mr. Clapper, age 64, has been the Chief Executive Officer of Minerva Surgical, a medical device company, since May 2011. He has had an extensive career in the healthcare and medical device industries, including serving as the President and Chief Executive Officer (2005-2008) of SurgRx, Inc., a privately held medical device manufacturer, until its acquisition by Ethicon Endo-Surgery in 2008, as well as a variety of public and private company directorships. Mr. Clapper was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in October 2004 and was first elected by stockholders in April 2005.

 

Public Directorships:		•  Carbylan Therapeutics, a pharmaceutical company (since 2014)
Private Directorships:		•  CORRX, Inc., a medical device company (since 2011) •  Corinth Medical, a medical device company (since 2011) •  RELIGN Corporation, a medical device company (since 2011) •  MOSIAX, Inc., a medical device company (since 2011)
Prior Directorships:		•  Arqos Surgical, Inc., a technology holding company (2011-2015) •  IOGYN, Inc., a medical device company (2011-2014) •  Neomend, a designer of surgical sealants and adhesion prevention products (acquired by CR Bard) (2010-2012) •  Baxano, a private medical device manufacturer (2009-2011) •  Dfine, Inc., a private electrosurgical system developer (2007-2011) •  Sierra Surgical Technologies, a private surgical device company (2007-2011) •  Other directorships completed prior to 2009 include: Pulmonx, a private medical device company (2003-2006); Conor Medsystems, a public developer of drug delivery technology (acquired by Johnson and Johnson) (2004-2007); St. Francis Medical Technology, a private medical device manufacturer (acquired by Kyphon/Medtronic) (2006); Novacept, a private medical device company (acquired by Cytyc/Hologic) (1999-2004); Focal, Inc., a public company developer of surgical sealants (acquired by Genzyme/Sanofi) (1994-1999)
Other Prior Experience:		•  President and Chief Executive Officer, Novacept (1999-2004) •  President and Chief Executive Officer, Focal, Inc. (1994-1999) •  Various management positions at Johnson & Johnson, a public company provider of professional consumer health care products and services (1977-1993)
Education:		•  Bachelor’s degree in Marketing from Bowling Green State University

Skills/ Qualifications:		In particular, Mr. Clapper’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:   •  Client Industry – deep experience with both a variety of public and private life science companies (as part of management and/or as a director) •  Leadership – current role as CEO of Minerva Surgical, as well as held other prior CEO positions of other life science companies

 

5

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

Roger F. Dunbar				Board Committees:		Independent:
				•     Risk, Chair •     Audit •     Finance •     Governance		Yes

Mr. Dunbar, age 70, is our current Chairman of the Board of Directors, and subject to his election, he is expected to continue to serve as our Board Chairman during the 2016-2017 director term. Mr. Dunbar retired from Ernst and Young in 2004, where he served in a variety of positions since 1974, including key leadership positions. Mr. Dunbar was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in October 2004 and was first elected by stockholders in April 2005.

 

Prior Experience with Ernst & Young:		•  Global Vice Chairman, Strategic Growth Markets and Venture Capital (2000-2004) •  Member, Global Practice Council, London, United Kingdom (2000-2004) •  Member, Global Management Committee, London, United Kingdom (2000-2004) •  Member of US Area Managing Partners Leadership Group (1992-2000) •  Client Service Partner and other key positions, including Partner-in-Charge and Area Managing Partner, Silicon Valley and the Pacific Northwest Area (1974-2000)
Prior Directorships:		•  Advisory Board Member, SVB Financial Group and Silicon Valley Bank (2001-2004) •  Desert Mountain Property, Inc. (2009-2015) •  Desert Mountain Club, Inc. (2009-2015)
Other Prior Experience:		•  Instructor, Santa Clara University’s Graduate School of Business •  Instructor, Ernst & Young’s National Education Program •  Advisory Boards, Santa Clara University and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo •  Joint Venture Silicon Valley’s 21st Century Education Board •  U.S. Naval Officer (1967-1980)
Education:		•  Bachelor’s degree in Business from San Francisco State University •  Master’s degree in Business Administration from Santa Clara University •  Certified public accountant, inactive, and a member of the California State Board of Accountancy and the AICPA

Skills/ Qualifications:		In particular, Mr. Dunbar’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:   •  Client Industry and Global – deep experience working with both public and private companies and venture capital firms through Ernst & Young, as well as in the global markets, particularly in United Kingdom and Israel •  Leadership – held a variety of key executive positions, including Global Vice Chairman of Ernst & Young •  Finance and Risk Management – extensive domestic and international capital markets, finance, accounting and audit experience with Ernst & Young

 

6

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

Joel P. Friedman				Board Committees:		Independent:
				•     Finance, Chair •     Governance •     Risk		Yes

Mr. Friedman, age 68, retired from Accenture, a public company global management consulting firm in 2005, where he held the position of President of the Business Process Outsourcing (“BPO”) organization. Over the course of his 34-year career with Accenture, Mr. Friedman held a variety of senior leadership roles. Mr. Friedman was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in October 2004 and was first elected by stockholders in April 2005.

 

Public Directorships:		•  NeuStar, a provider of essential clearinghouse services to the communications industry (since 2006)
Private Directorships:		•  Advisory Director, FTV Capital (formerly Financial Technology Ventures) (since 2005) •  Advisory Director, Community Gatepath, a non-profit organization dedicated to enabling persons with disabilities to live as fully integrated members of the community (since 2013; director from 1991-2012)
Prior Experience with Accenture:		•  President of the BPO organization •  Managing Partner, Banking and Capital Markets •  Managing General Partner, Accenture Technology Ventures •  Founder, Accenture strategy consulting practice
Prior Directorships:		•  EXL Services (Advisory Director), a provider of offshore business process outsourcing solutions (2008-2011) •  Endeca Technologies, Inc., a provider of enterprise search solutions (2006-2011) (acquired by Oracle) •  Junior Achievement of Northern California, a non-profit organization that assists young people understand the economics of life (2004-2010) •  Other directorships completed prior to 2009 include: Accenture, a global management consulting firm (2001-2005); Seisint, Inc.; Calico Commerce, Inc.; Rivio Inc.; and TheBrain Technologies.
Other Prior Experience:		•  Dean’s Advisory Council for Stanford Graduate School of Business (1998-2004)
Education:		•  Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Yale University •  Master’s degree in Business Administration from Stanford University

Skills/ Qualifications:		In particular, Mr. Friedman’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:   •  Client Industry and Banking/Financial Services – extensive experience working with venture capital firms and within the banking industry through Accenture •  Leadership – held a variety of key executive positions, including President of the Business Process Outsourcing organization within Accenture •  Finance – deep experience with corporate finance and capital markets through Accenture

 

7

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

Lata Krishnan				Board Committees:		Independent:
				•     Audit •     Finance		Yes

Ms. Krishnan, age 55, is the Chief Financial Officer of Shah Capital Partners (“Shah Capital”), a leading mid-market technology private equity fund that she joined upon its inception in 2003. Prior to joining Shah Capital, Ms. Krishnan held various corporate accounting and finance positions with leading financial firms. Ms. Krishnan was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in February 2008 and was first elected by stockholders in April 2008.

Private Directorships:		•  Chair, American India Foundation, an organization dedicated to accelerating social and economic development in India (since 2001) •  The Commonwealth Club, a public affairs forum (since 2004)
Other Experience:		•  Fellow, American Leadership Forum (since 1998)
Prior Directorships:		•  Enlighted, Inc., an information technology consulting firm (2010-2013) •  TiE, a non-profit global network of entrepreneurs and professionals •  Global Heritage Fund, an international heritage conservancy (2009-2011) •  CEO Women, an organization to create economic opportunities for low-income immigrant and refugee women (2009-2011) •  America’s Foundation for Chess, a foundation committed to children’s education (2003-2011) •  Global Philanthropy Forum, a council on world affairs (2006-2011) •  Narika, a shelter for abused women in the Asian community (1998-2011)
Other Prior Experience:		•  Co-Founder and Chief Financial Officer, SMART Modular Technologies, Inc., a manufacturer of computer memory modules (1989-1999) •  Various corporate accounting and finance positions with Montgomery Services •  Various corporate accounting and finance positions with Arthur Andersen & Company LLP •  Various corporate accounting and finance positions with Hill Vellacott & Company in London
Education:		•  Bachelor’s degree with honors from the London School of Economics •  Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales

Skills/ Qualifications:		In particular, Ms. Krishnan’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:   •  Client Industry and Finance – served as co-founder and chief financial officer of a technology company; experience with a leading technology private equity fund; served in a variety of accounting/finance positions •  Global – deep experience in global markets, particularly in India and the United Kingdom

 

8

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

Jeffrey N. Maggioncalda				Board Committees:		Independent:
				•     Compensation •     Credit		Yes

Mr. Maggioncalda, age 47, is the former Chief Executive Officer of Financial Engines, an independent investment advisory firm. Mr. Maggioncalda served in this role since Financial Engines’s inception in 1996 until 2014. Mr. Maggioncalda also served as a director of the company from 2011 to 2014. Mr. Maggioncalda was first elected as a director of the Company by the stockholders in April 2012.

Prior Directorships:		•   Financial Engines, an independent investment advisory firm (2011-2014) •   Affinity Circles, a social networking developer
Other Prior Experience:		•   Summer Associate, McKinsey & Co., a strategy consulting firm (1995) •   Associate, Cornerstone Research, an economic and financial consulting firm (1991-1994)
Education:		•   Bachelor’s degree in Economics and English from Stanford University •   Master’s degree in Business Administration from Stanford University
Skills/ Qualifications:		In particular, Mr. Maggioncalda’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:   •   Leadership – former role as CEO and director of Financial Engines •   Banking/Financial Services – extensive experience in the investment advisory industry

 

Mary J. Miller				Board Committees:		Independent:
				•     Finance		Yes

Ms. Miller, age 60, is the former Under Secretary for Domestic Finance for the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“U.S. Treasury”). Ms. Miller served in two Presidential appointments at the U.S. Treasury, from her Senate confirmation as Assistant Secretary for Financial Markets in February 2010 through her subsequent confirmation as Under Secretary of Domestic Finance in 2012 until September 2014. Prior to joining the U.S. Treasury, Ms. Miller held various positions with T. Rowe Price Group from 1983 to 2009. Ms. Miller was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in May 2015.

Private Directorships:		•   Trustee, Cornell University, a higher education institution (since 2015) •   ICE Benchmark Association, a unit of the Intercontinental Exchange (“ICE”) (since 2014)
Other Experience:		•   Trustee, The Urban Institute, a non-profit research organization (since 2014)
Other Prior Experience:		•   Director, Fixed Income Division, T. Rowe Price Group, a global investment management firm (2004-2010) •   Various investment management positions with T. Rowe Price Group
Education:		•   Bachelor’s degree in Government from Cornell University •   Master’s degree in City and Regional Planning from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill •   Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA)
Skills/ Qualifications:		In particular, Ms. Miller’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:   •   Leadership – held key leadership positions within the U.S. Treasury •   Banking/Financial Services – extensive experience in financial markets, including regulatory experience; deep experience in the investment advisory industry

 

9

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

Kate D. Mitchell				Board Committees:		Independent:
				•     Compensation, Chair •     Audit •     Risk		Yes

Ms. Mitchell, age 57, is Managing Partner and Co-Founder of Scale Venture Partners (“Scale”), a venture capital firm where she leads investments in software and business services and is instrumental in building the firm’s team and strategic direction. Prior to founding Scale in 1996, Ms. Mitchell held a variety of senior management positions with Bank of America. Ms. Mitchell was elected by stockholders as a director of the Company in April 2010.

Private Directorships:		•  mBlox, Inc., a mobile transaction network provider (since 2010) •  PeopleMatter (PMW Technologies, Inc.), a provider of human resource management solutions (since 2014) •  National Venture Capital Association, a trade association focused on regulatory and economic policy impacting the venture industry and the companies that are funded by venture capital (2007-2011 and since 2014)
Other Experience:		•  Member, Steering Committee, Private Equity Women Investor Network, a forum for senior women in private equity (since 2010) •  Member, Nasdaq Private Market Advisory Council, an advisory forum related to private capital markets (since 2014) •  Co-Chair, NVCA Diversity Task Force, a forum to increase opportunities for women and minorities in venture capital and entrepreneurship (since 2014) •  Silicon Valley Community Foundation, a non-profit organization advising philanthropic solutions for regional and global issues (since 2015)
Prior Directorships:		•  Wayport, Inc. (2000-2008) •  Friends of the San Francisco Public Library (2007-2010) •  Chairman, National Venture Capital Association (2010-2011) •  Member of National Venture Capital Association Executive Committee (2007-2011) •  Jaspersoft, Inc., a manufacturer of business intelligence software (2009-2014) •  New Century Hospice, a provider of hospice services for patients, families and healthcare providers (2014-2015) •  Other directorships completed prior to 2009 include: Songbird Medical (1998-2005); Acusphere, Inc., a public pharmaceutical company (1999-2005); Tonic Software, Inc. (2000-2005); Pavilion Technologies, Inc. (2004-2007)
Other Prior Experience:		•  Silicon Valley Bank Venture Capital Advisory Board (2008-2013) •  Various senior management positions in finance and technology (including Senior Vice President), Bank of America •  Various finance and lending positions at Bank of California (now Union Bank of California)
Education:		•  Bachelor’s degree in Political Science from Stanford University •  Master’s degree in Business Administration from Golden Gate University

Skills/ Qualifications:		In particular, Ms. Mitchell’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:   •  Client Industry – deep experience and knowledge of the venture capital industry and innovation companies (as a venture capital investor and/or a director); current role as co-founder and partner of Scale Ventures •  Banking/Financial Services – held a variety of key executive positions at a large global bank •  Finance – extensive finance and asset/liability management experience at two nationally-recognized banks

 

10

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

John F. Robinson				Board Committees:		Independent:
				•     Audit, Chair •     Compensation •     Credit •     Risk		Yes

Mr. Robinson, age 69, is a former Executive Vice President of Washington Mutual Bank, a financial lending institution. Prior to his position with Washington Mutual, Mr. Robinson served with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency as a Deputy Comptroller. Mr. Robinson was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in July 2010 and was first elected by stockholders in April 2011.

Public Directorships:		•  Vogogo, Inc., a provider of verification tools for risk management and payment processing (since 2015) •  Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (since 2011)
Other Experience:		•  National Outdoor Leadership School Advisory Committee (since 2007)
Prior Directorships:		•  Operation HOPE, a non-profit organization focusing on economic improvements for poverty-stricken people in America (2004-2013) •  Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (2004-2005 and 2007-2008) •  Long Beach Mortgage Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Washington Mutual Bank (2004-2006) •  Long Beach Securities Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Washington Mutual Bank (2004-2006)
Other Prior Experience:		•  Executive Vice President, Washington Mutual Bank, a financial lending institution (2002-2008) •  Deputy Comptroller, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (1997-2002)
Education:		•  Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Washington University in St. Louis •  Master’s degree in Business Administration from Harvard University •  Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA)

Skills/ Qualifications:		In particular, Mr. Robinson’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:   •  Banking/Financial Services – deep banking and regulatory experience, especially as a former bank regulator •  Risk Management – held a variety of executive risk management positions at a nationally-recognized bank

 

11

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

Garen K. Staglin				Board Committees:		Independent:
				•     Compensation •     Governance		Yes

Mr. Staglin, age 71, is the founder and proprietor of Staglin Family Vineyard, founded in 1985 in the Rutherford region of Napa Valley. Over the past 40 years, Mr. Staglin has also held a variety of positions in the financial and insurance services industries. Mr. Staglin was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in August 2011 and was first elected by stockholders in April 2012.

Public Directorships:		•  Chairman, EXL Services, a provider of outsourcing services to global companies (since 2005)
Private Directorships:		•  Senior Advisor and Advisory Director, FTV Capital (formerly Financial Technology Ventures), (since 2004) •  Vice Chairman, Profit Velocity Solutions, a manufacturing analytics firm (since 2007) •  Chairman, Nvoice Payments, an electronic payment service provider (since 2010)
Other Experience:		•  Founder and President, International Mental Health Research Organization, devoted to raising awareness and funding research to find a cure for major mental illnesses (since 1995) •  Founder and Co-Chairman, One Mind 4 Research, a non-profit organization devoted to accelerating cures and treatments for all brain disorders (since 2010)
Prior Directorships:		•  Advisory Director, Specialized Bicycle, a manufacturer of cycling equipment (1995-2014) •  Chairman, Free Run Technologies, an internet and technology services company (2003-2014) •  Bottomline Technologies, a provider of payment and invoice automation software and services (2007-2012) •  Advisory Board, Blaze Mobile, a mobile payments company (2006-2011) •  Global Document Solutions, a document processing outsourcing company (2005-2010) •  Solera Holdings, Inc., an automotive insurance software service provider (2005-2011) •  Other directorships completed prior to 2009 include: First Data Corporation, a payment solutions provider (1992-2003); Quick Response Services, a retail management and supply chain services company (1991-2001); CyberCash, Inc., a micro-payments and platform company (1996-2000); Chairman, Safelite Auto Glass, a national auto glass provider (1993-1999)
Other Prior Experience:		•  Founder and President, Bring Change 2 Mind, an organization devoted to removing the stigma associated with mental illness (2009-2014)
Education:		•  Bachelor’s degree in Engineering-Electrical and Nuclear from the University of California, Los Angeles •  Master’s degree in Business Administration, Finance and Systems Analysis from Stanford University Graduate School of Business

Skills/ Qualifications:		In particular, Mr. Staglin’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:   •  Client Industry and Banking/Financial Services – extensive experience working within the wine and transaction/payment processing industries, as well as experience working with innovation companies (as a director) •  Leadership – held a variety of leadership roles, including his Chairman role with EXL Services as well as other founder and president roles with various non-profit organizations

 

12

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND BOARD MATTERS

We are committed to having sound corporate governance principles. These principles are important to the way in which we manage our business and to maintaining our integrity in the marketplace, and are discussed in further detail in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. (A copy of our guidelines is available at www.svb.com under “Corporate Governance.” The contents of the website are not incorporated herein by reference and the website address provided above and throughout this Proxy Statement is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.)

Board Independence and Leadership

The Board has determined that, with the exception of Mr. Becker, our President and CEO, all of our current directors and director nominees, are “independent” within the meaning of the director independence standards set by Nasdaq and the SEC, as currently in effect.

Additionally, our Bylaws provide that the Board shall not have more than two directors who do not meet the definition of an “Outside Director.” An Outside Director is any director who meets the independence and experience requirements of the SEC and Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”) and who, in the opinion of the Board, has the ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director of the Company. All of our current directors, except for our CEO, are considered Outside Directors.

Separate Chairperson/CEO Roles

The Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to maintain the Board chairperson and CEO positions separately. It believes that having an outside, independent director serve as chairperson is the most appropriate leadership structure for the Board, as it enhances the Board’s independent oversight of management and our strategic planning, reinforces the Board’s ability to exercise its independent judgment to represent stockholder interests, and strengthens the objectivity and integrity of the Board. Moreover, an independent chairperson can more effectively lead the Board in objectively evaluating the performance of management, including the CEO, and guide it through appropriate Board governance processes.

Mr. Dunbar, our current Chairman of the Board, is independent within the meaning of the director independence standards described above. Subject to his election, Mr. Dunbar is expected to serve as the Board’s Chairman for the 2016-2017 term.

Executive Sessions

The Company’s independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present.

Board Risk Oversight and Risk Committee

Oversight of the Company’s risk management is one of the Board’s key priorities, and is carried out both by the Board as a whole, as well as by each of its various committees.

In January 2015, the Board formed a committee to specifically focus on the Company’s risk management. Our Risk Committee is comprised of the chairpersons of each of the Board and the Audit, Compensation, Credit, Finance and Governance Committees. The Risk Committee has the primary oversight responsibility for the Company’s enterprise-wide risk management (“EWRM”) framework, including the oversight of risk management policies, and the monitoring of the Company’s risk profile. In addition, the Risk Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s compliance with its risk appetite statement, which sets forth the levels of various acceptable key risks underlying the Company’s business. The Risk Committee also oversees compliance with, and recommends any changes for Board approval to, the Company’s risk appetite statement. Our other Board committees also share responsibility for the risk appetite statement by overseeing and approving applicable risk metrics, including risk limits and thresholds, for each of their relevant areas of responsibility.

Additionally, each Board committee is engaged in overseeing the Company’s risks in its respective areas of oversight. For example, the Audit Committee regularly oversees our risks relating to our accounting and financial reporting, as well as legal, information technology and security-related risks. The Compensation Committee engages in periodic risk assessments to review and evaluate our compensation programs in relation to our risks. The Finance Committee actively oversees our capital, liquidity and financial management and the associated risks (whether as an ongoing matter or as it relates specifically to a transaction, such as an equity or debt securities offering). Moreover, the Credit Committee routinely oversees our management of credit risks. Each committee chairperson regularly reports back to both the Risk Committee and the full Board on its risk oversight activities. In addition, the Board routinely engages in discussions with management about the Company’s risks.

 

13

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

Annual Board Evaluation

The Governance Committee of the Board conducts, in coordination with the full Board, an evaluation of the Board’s performance and effectiveness, either the Board as a whole and/or on an individual director basis. The Governance Committee develops and implements a process for such evaluation and review, which may involve outside consultants or advisers and may include a review of how certain attributes affect Board effectiveness, such as Board size, meeting frequency, quality and timing of information provided to the Board, director communication, director education, director skills and qualifications, director independence and Board strategy sessions. The results of the evaluation are discussed with the Board. The Governance Committee also leads an evaluation of the performance and effectiveness of each of the Board’s committees. All Board and committee evaluations are typically conducted on an annual basis. See “Board Committees—Committee Governance” below.

Board Succession Planning

The Board’s succession planning is primarily overseen by the Governance Committee. Such planning takes into account the balancing of the appropriate representation of experience and skills on the Board, with the importance of Board refreshment. Identifying possible director candidates that possess the appropriate qualifications and the desire to serve on a financial services public company board, as well as who will complement our existing Board, takes time and effort. As such, the Governance Committee discusses recruiting strategies and actively considers potential director candidates, whether or not there is an immediate vacancy on the Board to fill. The Governance Committee also reports to and discusses succession planning with the full Board.

In 2015, the Board added one new director (Ms. Mary Miller) who brings a scope of skills, experience and perspectives to enhance the already well-rounded Board of Directors.

Oversight of CEO

Annual CEO Performance Evaluation

The independent members of the Board evaluate the performance of our CEO on an annual basis. Each year, the Governance Committee approves the process to solicit the Board’s feedback. Our Chairman of the Board, together with the chairpersons of the Governance and Compensation Committees, then lead discussions with the Board (without the CEO present) to evaluate the CEO’s performance, both generally as well as against certain predetermined annual goals.

CEO Succession Planning

As a matter of sound governance, the Board, through a special committee of the Board, routinely reviews and discusses the Company’s contingency plans for CEO succession. The special committee seeks input from our current CEO and our Head of Human Resources, as well as external advisors, as appropriate. The special committee also reports to and discusses any such plans with the full Board.

Meeting Attendance

Board and Committee Meetings

The Board held eight (8) meetings during fiscal year 2015. For the number of committee meetings held in 2015, see “Board Committees—Committee Chairpersons/Membership, Responsibilities and Meetings” below. Each director attended in person or via teleconference 75% or more of the total number of meetings of the Board, and of the committees on which he or she served, which were held during the period for which he or she was a director or committee member.

Stockholder Meetings

It is the Board’s policy that each director employs his or her best efforts to attend each of our annual stockholder meetings. Eight of our eleven then-serving Board members attended our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

14

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

Consideration of Director Nominees

Stockholder Nominees

The Governance Committee will consider Board nominees proposed by stockholders. The Governance Committee has no formal policy with regard to stockholder nominees as it considers all nominees on their merits, as discussed below. Any stockholder nominations proposed for consideration by the Governance Committee should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership and should be addressed to:

SVB Financial Group

3003 Tasman Drive

Santa Clara, California 95054

Attn: General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Facsimile: (408) 969-6500

In addition, our Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for consideration at an annual stockholder meeting. For a description of the process for nominating directors in accordance with the Bylaws, please see “Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations” below.

Board Diversity; Selection and Evaluation of Director Candidates

While the Board has not formally adopted a policy governing board diversity, it recognizes the importance of assembling a well-rounded, diverse body of directors. The Governance Committee, with the participation of the full Board, is primarily responsible for reviewing the composition of the Board and for identifying candidates for membership on the Board, all in light of our ongoing requirements, its assessment of the Board’s performance and any input received from stockholders or other key constituencies. The Governance Committee makes determinations as to whether to recommend directors for re-election or director candidates’ nomination to the Board based on their skills, character, judgment and business experience, as well as their ability to diversify and add to the Board’s existing strengths. The Governance Committee typically seeks an appropriate mix of individuals with diverse backgrounds and skills complementary to our business and strategic direction. In addition to the areas of director qualifications and attributes discussed under “Director Qualifications” above, this assessment includes consideration of areas of expertise in industries important to us (such as technology; life science/healthcare; energy and resource innovation; premium wine; and venture capital/private equity), functional expertise in areas such as banking/financial services, public companies, global markets, legal/compliance, regulatory, accounting, finance, operations, information technology and risk management, and an assessment of an individual’s abilities to work constructively with the other Board members and management.

Communications with the Board

Individuals who wish to communicate with our Board may do so by sending an e-mail to our Board at bod@svb.com. Any communications intended for non-management directors should be sent to the e-mail address above to the attention of the Board Chairman. Board-related communications are reviewed by the Chairman of the Board and shared with the full Board as appropriate.

Code of Ethics

We have a Code of Ethics for Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers (the “Code of Ethics”) that applies to our CEO, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and other senior members of the Finance staff. A copy of this Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.svb.com under “Corporate Governance,” or can be obtained without charge by any person requesting it. (The contents of the website are not incorporated herein by reference and the website address provided above and throughout this Proxy Statement is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.) To request a copy of our Code of Ethics, please contact: Kristi Gilbaugh, SVB Financial Group, 3003 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054, or by telephone (408) 654-7400.

We intend to disclose any waivers from or changes to our Code of Ethics by posting such information on our website. No waivers or substantive changes were made during fiscal year 2015.

 

15

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

BOARD COMMITTEES

Our Board has created a sound committee structure designed to help the Board carry out its responsibilities in an effective and efficient manner. There are six (6) standing Board committees: Audit, Compensation, Credit, Finance, Governance and Risk.

Committee Independence and Audit Committee Financial Experts

The Board has determined that each of the current members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Governance Committee and Risk Committee are “independent” under Nasdaq director independence standards and other applicable regulatory requirements.

In addition, the Board has determined that each of Messrs. Robinson and Dunbar and Ms. Krishnan are “audit committee financial experts,” as defined under SEC rules, and possess “financial sophistication,” as defined under the rules of Nasdaq.

Committee Governance

Committee Charters

Each committee is governed by a charter that is approved by the Board, which sets forth each committee’s purpose and responsibilities. The Board reviews the committees’ charters, and each committee reviews its own charter, on at least an annual basis, to assess the charters’ content and sufficiency, with final approval of any proposed changes required by the full Board. The charters of each committee are available on our website, www.svb.com under “Corporate Governance.” (The contents of the website are not incorporated herein by reference and the website address provided above and throughout this Proxy Statement is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.)

The charters provide that each committee has adequate resources and authority to discharge its responsibilities, including appropriate funding for the retention of external consultants or advisers, as it deems necessary or appropriate.

Annual Committee Evaluations

The Governance Committee, in coordination with the Board, implements and develops a process to conduct an assessment of committee performance and effectiveness. Typically, the assessments are conducted on an annual basis, and include a self-assessment by each committee. The review includes an evaluation of various areas that may include committee sizes, committee composition, committee performance, committee coordination with one another and committee involvement of the full Board. The results of the committee performance assessments are reviewed by each committee, as well as by the Governance Committee, and discussed with the full Board.

Committee Chairpersons/Membership, Responsibilities and Meetings

All committee chairpersons are independent and appointed annually by the Board of Directors. Each chairperson presides over committee meetings; oversees meeting agendas; serves as liaison between the committee members and the Board, as well as between committee members and management; and works actively and closely with management on all committee matters, as appropriate.

The committees meet regularly, at least on a quarterly basis. The committees, typically through their committee chairpersons, routinely report their activities to, and discuss their recommendations, with the full Board. In addition, certain committees periodically hold extended meetings dedicated to discussing key strategic matters or other business items on a more in-depth basis, that are relevant or subject to the committee’s oversight responsibilities.

 

16

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

The names of the members and highlights of some of the key oversight responsibilities of the committees are set forth below:

 

Audit Committee (9 meetings in 2015)   •   Our corporate accounting and financial reporting processes and the quality and integrity of our financial statements and reports. •   The qualification, independence, engagement and performance of our independent auditors. •   The performance of our internal auditing function, as well as other key functions, including information technology, security, legal and regulatory matters.		John Robinson, Chair Dave Clapper Roger Dunbar Lata Krishnan Kate Mitchell

 

Compensation Committee (10 meetings in 2015)   •   Our overall compensation strategies, plans, policies and programs. •   The approval of executive and director compensation. •   The assessment of compensation-related risks.		Kate Mitchell, Chair Jeff Maggioncalda John Robinson Garen Staglin

 

Credit Committee (5 meetings in 2015)   •   The credit and lending strategies, objectives and risks of the Company and the Bank. •   The credit risk management of the Company and the Bank, including reviewing internal credit policies and establishing portfolio limits. •   The quality and performance of the credit portfolio of the Company and the Bank.		Dave Clapper, Chair Jeff Maggioncalda John Robinson

 

Finance Committee (9 meetings in 2015)   •   The financial risk management of the Company and the Bank. •   The financial strategies and objectives of the Company and the Bank, including the capital planning, capital and liquidity management, and the annual budget. •   The review of the Company and Bank’s financial performance and compliance with applicable financial regulatory requirements, including stress testing. •   The review of certain corporate development matters, such as strategic investments.		Joel Friedman, Chair Eric Benhamou Roger Dunbar Lata Krishnan Mary Miller

 

Governance Committee (5 meetings in 2015)   •   Our general corporate governance practices, including review of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. •   The annual performance evaluation process of our Board and its committees, and CEO. •   The identification and nomination of director candidates. •   Our regulatory compliance function of the Company and the Bank.		Eric Benhamou, Chair Roger Dunbar Joel Friedman Garen Staglin

 

Risk Committee (4 meetings in 2015)   •   The enterprise-wide risk management policies of the Company. •   The operation of our enterprise-wide risk management framework. •   Our compliance with the Company’s risk appetite statement. •   The review of changes to our risk profile.		Roger Dunbar, Chair Eric Benhamou Dave Clapper Joel Friedman Kate Mitchell John Robinson

 

17

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

 

18

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2015, the Compensation Committee performed all compensation functions of the Board, except for the approval of CEO compensation, which was approved by the independent members of the Board based on the Compensation Committee’s recommendation. (See discussion above under “Board Committees – Committee Chairpersons/Membership, Responsibilities and Meetings” for additional information on the Compensation Committee.) Mr. Becker does not participate in any of the Board or Compensation Committee discussions related to the evaluation of his performance or the recommendation/determination of his compensation. See descriptions of related transactions between us and each of the members of the Compensation Committee, if any, under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below.

None of the members of the Compensation Committee has ever been one of our officers or employees and none of our executive officers serves, or in the past fiscal year served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving on our Board.

 

19

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION FOR DIRECTORS

The following table sets forth the amounts earned or paid to each non-employee member of our Board of Directors during the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

Overview   Our compensation for our non-employee directors is designed to be competitive with other financial institutions that are similar in size, complexities and/or business models. In addition, our director compensation is designed to be tied to business performance and stockholder returns, and to align director and stockholder interests through director ownership of the Company’s stock.   The Compensation Committee oversees and approves our director compensation and reports to, and consults with as appropriate, the full Board on all relevant matters. While the committee reviews our director compensation structure on a regular basis, there were no material changes made in 2015.   Our CEO, the only employee director on the Board, does not receive any payment for services as a director.		Name		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash				Stock Awards ($) (1)				Total
		Roger F. Dunbar		$	192,500			$	200,007			$	392,507
		Eric A. Benhamou			83,250				100,004				183,254
		David M. Clapper			86,250				100,004				186,254
		Joel P. Friedman			84,000				100,004				184,004
		C. Richard Kramlich (2)			67,500				100,004				167,504
		Lata Krishnan			71,500				100,004				171,504
		Jeffrey N. Maggioncalda			70,750				100,004				170,754
		Mary J. Miller (3)			51,750				100,004				151,754
		Kate D. Mitchell			94,000				100,004				194,004
		John F. Robinson			112,250				100,004				212,254
		Garen K. Staglin			65,250				100,004				165,254
		(1)  Values indicated for annual director equity grants reflect the fair value of awards made during the fiscal year for the 2015-2016 term. Such values were computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The actual value realized is subject to our stock price performance on the date of release. (2)  Mr. Kramlich retired from the Board of Directors effective as of December 31, 2015 and transitioned to an advisory director position. (3)  Ms. Miller joined the Board of Directors as of May 12, 2015.

Elements of Director Compensation

Compensation for our non-employee directors reflects a combination of cash (annual retainer fees and meeting fees) and equity (annual restricted stock unit awards). Consistent with 2014, the components of our non-employee director compensation for 2015 were as follows:

 

Annual Director Retainer Fee		$35,000
Annual Chairperson Fee		$90,000, Board Chair $20,000, Audit Committee Chair $15,000, Compensation Committee and Risk Committee Chairs $12,000, all other committee chairs
Board Meeting Fees		$1,000 (in-person)/$500 (telephonic) $3,000 per day, for extended strategic planning meetings
Committee Meeting Fees		$2,500 (in-person)/$1,250 (telephonic), Audit Committee $1,500 (in-person)/$750 (telephonic), all other committees $5,000 per day, for extended Audit Committee strategic planning meetings $3,000 per day, for extended strategic planning meetings for all other committees
Annual Equity Retainer Award		Total grant value of approximately $200,000 and $100,000 for the Board Chair and each of the other non-employee directors, respectively; form of restricted stock units, subject to annual vesting.

The members of the Board are also eligible for reimbursement for their reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings or the performance of their director duties in accordance with Company policy.

 

20

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

Director Equity Compensation; Deferral Elections

Our annual equity retainer awards are typically granted to directors in the form of restricted stock units. The awards are approved by the Compensation Committee and granted after the annual meeting of stockholders (typically the following month), and vest in full upon the completion of the annual director term on the date of the next annual meeting. In 2015, the directors were granted an aggregate of 8,844 restricted stock units with a scheduled vesting date of April 21, 2016.

Non-employee directors may elect an irrevocable deferral of the receipt of restricted stock unit awards until the earliest of: (a) a specific future settlement date that meets the requirements of Internal Revenue Code 409A, (b) separation from service, (c) the date of a change in control, (d) death, or (e) date of disability. Elections will apply to restricted stock unit awards received during 2015. Ms. Krishnan and Ms. Mitchell elected to defer the receipt of their 2015 equity grants of 737 restricted stock units each.

Equity Plan Limits Applicable to Directors

Equity grants to directors are subject to the terms of our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, including the following limitations (as provided under the plan):

 

•

No non-employee director may be granted in any fiscal year shares having an initial value greater than $500,000.

 

•

Annual director grants of full value equity awards may become fully vested no earlier than the last day of the director’s then current annual term of service, subject to certain limited exceptions as provided under the plan.

Determination of Director Compensation

Each year, the Compensation Committee, together with its independent compensation consultant, conducts a comprehensive review of director compensation, taking into consideration our overall compensation philosophy, as well as competitive compensation data from the Company’s 2015 Peer Group and other relevant and comparable market data and trends. The committee routinely reviews each of the various pay components, the form and amount of payment, as well as the cash/equity compensation mix. Based on such review and any recommendations from its independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee will make changes to the extent it deems appropriate.

Director Equity Ownership Guidelines

Under the current equity ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors, each non-employee member of the Board of Directors is expected to hold, within five years of becoming a director, shares of our Common Stock that have a minimum value equivalent to 600% of his or her annual retainer fee.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting and periodically reviewing the guidelines. Equity ownership requirements for directors are established based upon a competitive review and subsequent recommendations by the committee’s independent compensation consultant. The Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing director compliance with these guidelines, and reviews directors’ holdings on a quarterly basis. Any exceptions to meeting the guidelines due to personal financial or other reasons are reviewed and determined by the Governance Committee.

As of December 31, 2015, all non-employee directors were in compliance with the applicable ownership guidelines.

 

21

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Related Party Transactions Policy

Our policy on related party transactions (“Related Party Policy”) governs the transactions involving us and certain related persons that are required to be disclosed under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K (“S-K 404”). We regularly monitor our business dealings and those of our directors and executive officers, as appropriate, to determine whether any such dealings would constitute a related party transaction under the Policy. Generally, under the policy, any transaction, arrangement or relationship will be considered an interested transaction subject to the review and/or approval of the Audit Committee, if: (i) we are a participant in the transaction; (ii) the aggregate transaction amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year; and (iii) a related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction. (Transactions not required to be disclosed under S-K 404 are excluded from this policy.) Moreover, any of the following persons is considered a related person under the Related Party Policy: (i) any director or executive officer of the Company; (ii) any nominee for director of the Company; (iii) any holder of more than 5% of our Common Stock; and (iv) any immediate family member of any of the above.

We have implemented a framework to identify potential related party transactions, which may include, from time to time, loan transactions by the Company or the Bank, investment transactions, compensation arrangements, or other business transactions involving us or our subsidiaries. Under this framework, we have processes in place to identify, review and escalate, as appropriate, proposed transactions involving a potential party related to the Company. In addition, employees are also expected to escalate any transaction involving potential conflicts of interests pursuant to our Code of Conduct.

The Audit Committee has primary responsibility for reviewing these transactions for potential conflicts of interests and approving them (or denying approval, as the case may be). Under the Related Party Policy, the Audit Committee’s approval may be granted in advance, ratified, or based on certain standing approvals previously authorized by resolution. The Audit Committee may delegate its approval authority under the Related Party Policy to the committee chairperson. Additionally, the Credit Committee reviews and approves related party loan transactions, and the Governance Committee takes into consideration related party transactions involving our directors, as part of its annual director independence review.

Insider Loan Policy

We also have in place a policy which permits the Bank to make loans to directors, executive officers and principal stockholders of the Bank or its affiliates (“Insiders”) and the related interests of those Insiders (“Insider Loans”), pursuant to the applicable requirements of Regulation O of the Federal Reserve Act (“Regulation O”). Moreover, Insider Loans qualify for an exemption from Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as they are made by the Bank and subject to Regulation O.

Pursuant to Regulation O, the Insider Loan policy authorizes the Bank to make Insider Loans if such Insider Loans: (a) are approved in advance by a majority of the Board of Directors of the Bank for Insider Loans where the aggregate amount of all outstanding extensions of credit to the Insider and to all related interests of the Insider exceeds $500,000; (b) are extended under substantially the same terms and conditions and rates as those prevailing at the time of the Insider Loan for comparable transactions with non-Insider Bank clients; and (c) do not have more than a normal risk of failure of repayment to the Bank or other unfavorable features. The Insider whose credit extension is subject to Board approval must not participate either directly or indirectly in the voting to approve such extension of credit.

Related Party Transactions

Loan Transactions

During 2015, the Bank made loans to related parties, including certain companies in which certain of our directors or their affiliated venture funds are beneficial owners of ten percent or more of the equity securities of such companies. Such loans: (a) were made in the ordinary course of business; (b) were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons; and (c) did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

Prior to their respective appointments as executive officers, each of John China and Philip Cox received a mortgage loan through the Bank’s Employee Home Ownership Program (“EHOP”), an employee benefit program whereby eligible employees of the Bank and its affiliates receive preferential terms on mortgage loans. Mr. China’s EHOP mortgage loan amount was $1,176,000, with a principal balance of $1,014,689 as of December 31, 2015. Mr. China’s loan matures April 1, 2016. Mr. Cox’s EHOP mortgage loan amount was $310,553, with a principal balance of $262,918 as of December 31, 2015. Mr. Cox’s loan matures October 1, 2018.

 

22

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

Employee Funds

In 2015, we formed Qualified Investors Fund IV, LLC (“QIF IV”), a $5.3 million employee-funded investment fund. Participating employees must meet certain eligibility requirements pursuant to applicable regulatory requirements. QIF IV invests employees’ own capital in funds, including certain SVB Capital funds. We do not charge a management fee on QIF IV, but pass on the cost of external expenses to the QIF IV participants. The following executive officers each made a commitment to QIF IV in commitment amounts ranging from $50 thousand to $250 thousand: Greg Becker, John China, Philip Cox, Michael Descheneaux, Michelle Draper, Joan Parsons, Bruce Wallace and Michael Zuckert.

Other Arrangements

Total compensation for 2015 for Jon Wolter, a vice president of the Bank and the son-in-law of Joan Parsons, was approximately $144,000 (including his base salary, bonuses, company contributions to his 401(k)/ESOP account, but excluding other normal benefits provided to all employees). His compensation is in accordance with our standard employment and compensation practices applicable to employees with equivalent qualifications and responsibilities as those holding similar positions. Ms. Parsons has no management oversight responsibility over Mr. Wolter, nor is she involved with any decisions concerning his compensation.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

We believe, based on a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments thereto filed with the SEC and other information known to us, that during fiscal year 2015 our directors, officers (as defined in the rules under Section 16 of the Exchange Act), and any greater than 10% stockholders have complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements in a timely manner; except for one late report relating to the disposition of shares held in the 401(k) account of our executive officer, Marc Verissimo, in November 2015 due to an inadvertent administrative error.

 

23

    ^{BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE}

---

Table of Contents

INFORMATION ON EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our executive officers perform policy-making functions for us within the meaning of applicable SEC rules. They may also serve as officers of the Bank and/or our other subsidiaries. There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers.

The following information outlines the name and age of each of our executive officers (as of the date of this Proxy Statement) and his or her principal occupation with the Company, followed by biographical information of each such executive officer:

 

Name		Age				Principal Occupation
Greg W. Becker			48			President and Chief Executive Officer
Marc C. Cadieux			49			Chief Credit Officer
John D. China			50			Head of Relationship Banking
Philip C. Cox			49			Head EMEA and President of the UK Branch
Michael R. Descheneaux			48			Chief Financial Officer
Michelle A. Draper			48			Chief Marketing Officer
Michael L. Dreyer			52			Chief Operations Officer
Christopher D. Edmonds-Waters			53			Head of Human Resources
Roger E. Leone			62			Chief Information Officer
Joan S. Parsons			57			Head of Specialty Banking
Marc J. Verissimo			60			Chief Risk Officer
Bruce E. Wallace			51			Chief Digital Officer
Michael S. Zuckert			57			General Counsel

 

 

Executive Biographies

Greg W. Becker’s biography can be found under “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors” above.

 

 

Marc C. Cadieux joined us in 1992 as Assistant Vice President and has held a variety of positions with us, including Division Risk Manager for the Company’s Eastern Division, where he was responsible for overseeing our commercial lending activities in the eastern United States, the United Kingdom and Israel. Mr. Cadieux was appointed Assistant Chief Credit Officer in 2009 and was later appointed as Chief Credit Officer in 2013, where he currently oversees our credit administration function.

 

Other Prior

•

Loan Workout Officer, Pacific Western Bank (1990-1992)

Experience:

•

Various credit positions with Bank of New England (1988-1990)

 

Education/ Other:

•

Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Colby College

 

 

 

 

 

24

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

John D. China joined us in 1996 as Senior Relationship Manager and has held a variety of positions with the Company, including Head of Venture Capital Group and Head of Private Equity Group. Mr. China was appointed the Head of Relationship Management in 2010. In 2014, Mr. China was appointed the Head of Relationship Banking, where he is responsible for overseeing all aspects of our relationships within the venture capital and private equity, private bank and commercial bank communities.

 

Other Experience:

•

Director, California Israel Chamber of Commerce, a non-profit organization dedicated to strengthening business and trade relations between California and Israel (since 2011)

•

Advisory Board Member, DEMO, an organization dedicated to emerging technology development (since 2010)

•

Director, Astia.org, a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the success of women-led, high-growth ventures (since 2009)

•

Advisory Council, Advancing Science in America, a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing science and technology in the United States (since 2013)

 

Other Prior Experience:

•

Director, Executive Council of New York City, a global community of senior executives (2001-2003)

 

Education/ Other:

•

Bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering from Stanford University

 

 

Philip C. Cox joined us in 2009 as Head of UK, Europe & Israel, where he was responsible for the overall strategic direction of the Company in the UK, Europe and Israel, as well as the establishment of our UK Branch banking business. He was appointed as Head of Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”) and President of the UK Branch in 2012, where he is focused on the international development of our business and is responsible for our UK branch.

 

Prior Directorships:

•

Entrepreneur First, an organization devoted to developing high-growth tech startups in London (2011-2014)

 

 

Other Prior

•

Head of Commercial Banking, Bank of Scotland (2008-2009)

Experience:

•

Chief Executive Officer, European Business, Torex Retail PLC, a manufacturing and industrial software company (2005-2008)

 

Education/

•

Associate of the Association of Corporate Treasurers, UK

Other:

•

Member of the Chartered Institute of Bankers, UK

 

 

Michael R. Descheneaux joined us in 2006 as Managing Director of Accounting and Financial Reporting, and was appointed as Chief Financial Officer in 2007, where he is responsible for all our finance, treasury, accounting and legal functions, as well as our funds management business. He also plays a key role in our global strategy and growth.

 

Private

•

Director, SPD Silicon Valley Bank, our joint venture bank in China (2012-2014; since 2015)

Directorships:

 

Other Prior

•

Managing Director, Navigant Consulting, a business consulting firm (2004-2006)

Experience:

•

Independent consultant (2002-2004)

•

Various leadership positions with Arthur Andersen for the Central and Eastern Europe Region (1995-2002)

¡

Lead Partner of financial services practice

¡

Lead audit partner of telecommunications/high-tech practice

•

Technical expert on U.S. GAAP and generally accepted auditing standards matters

 

Education/ Other:

•

Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Texas A&M University

•

Certified public accountant

•

Member of the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants

 

 

 

 

25

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

Michelle A. Draper joined us in 2013 as Chief Marketing Officer, where she is responsible for the strategy and execution of our global marketing initiatives. Prior to joining us, she was Senior Vice President of Institutional Services Marketing at Charles Schwab & Co.

 

Other Prior Experience:

•

Various senior-level marketing positions at Charles Schwab & Co., overseeing advertising, brand marketing and other key marketing strategies (1992-2013)

 

Education/ Other:

•

Bachelor’s degree in Journalism from California Polytechnic State University – San Luis Obispo

•

Series 7 General Securities Representative and Series 24 General Securities Principal Licenses

 

 

 

Michael L. Dreyer joined us in 2015 as Chief Operations Officer, where he is responsible for the Company’s global technology and infrastructure functions. Most recently, he served as the Chief Operations Officer and President of the Americas for Monitise, where he was responsible for the design, build and operations of its technology globally, and the company’s Americas business.

 

Public

•

Finisar Corporation, a supplier of optical communication products (since 2015)

Directorships:

•

F5 Networks Inc., a provider of application delivery services (since 2012)

 

Other Prior

•

Chief Operations Officer and President of the Americas at Monitise (2014-2015)

Experience:

•

Chief Information Officer (2005-2014); various senior level positions at Visa Inc. (1988-2005)

•

Various senior-level positions at American Express (1995-1998)

•

Various senior-level positions at Prime Financial, Inc. (1992-1995)

•

Various senior-level positions at Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (1990-1992)

•

Various senior-level positions at Bank of America (1989-1990)

 

Education/ Other:

•

Bachelor’s degree in Psychology from Washington State University

•

Master’s degree in Business Administration from Washington State University

 

 

Christopher D. Edmonds-Waters joined us in 2003 as Director of Organization Effectiveness, and in 2007, was appointed to his current role as Head of Human Resources, where he oversees our human resources function, which includes our compensation, global mobility, recruiting and learning and development functions.

 

Other Prior Experience:

•

Various senior-level positions at Charles Schwab & Co. (1996-2003), launching the company’s online training system

•

Various leadership roles with Macy’s California, managing corporate training programs

 

Education/

•

Bachelor’s degree in Intercultural Communications from Arizona State University

Other:

•

Master’s degree in Human Resources and Organization Development from the University of San Francisco

 

 

Roger E. Leone joined us in 2015 as Head of IT Infrastructure Engineering and Operations, and in September 2015, was appointed to his current role as Chief Information Officer, where he oversees our information technology functions. Prior to joining us, he served in a wide range of technology positions, including within the financial services industry. Prior to joining us, he held senior IT leadership roles at Pfizer, including as Vice President of Americas Regional Shared Services, where he managed a team of over 400 IT professionals supporting over 26,000 clients in the Americas.

 

Other Prior Experience:

•

Independent consultant (2011-2014)

•

Vice President Global IT Services at Yahoo! (2010-2011)

•

Various senior-level positions at Pfizer (1996-2010)

•

Various senior-level positions at Bank of America (1976-1996)

 

Education/

•

Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics from Utica College of Syracuse University

Other:

 

 

 

 

26

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

Joan S. Parsons joined us in 1994 and has served in a variety of leadership positions throughout the Company, including Eastern Division Manager and Chief Banking Officer. Ms. Parsons was appointed Head of U.S. Banking in 2008, and was appointed Head of Specialty Banking in 2014, where she is responsible for all specialty debt products; sponsor finance, mezzanine finance, life science and healthcare, and energy and resource innovation banking practices; loan syndications, SVB Investment Services and SVB Analytics.

 

Private

•

Director, StartUp Institute, Inc. (since 2014)

Directorships:

•

Director, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (since 2011)

•

Director, Planstrong Investment Management (since 2005)

 

Other Prior

•

Vice President of Corporate Banking, Fleet Bank of Massachusetts (1992-1994)

Experience:

•

Vice President, Barclays Bank PLC (1984-1992)

•

Banking Officer, Mellon Bank (1981-1983)

 

Education/ Other:

•

Bachelor’s degree in Economics and Art History from Wheaton College

 

 

 

 

Marc J. Verissimo joined us in 1993 and has served in a variety of leadership positions throughout the Company, including Manager of our Corporate Finance Group and our Risk Management Group. Mr. Verissimo was named Chief Strategy Officer in 2002. He is currently the Chief Risk Officer, where he is responsible for overseeing our credit, enterprise-wide risk management, corporate compliance and security functions.

 

Prior Directorships:

•

Entrepreneurs Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to strengthening the ties between entrepreneurial companies in the Bay Area and the communities in which they operate and their employees reside (2005-2012)

•

High Street Partners, Inc., a cross-border finance and administrative services firm (2009-2010)

 

Education/

•

Bachelor’s degree in Agricultural Economics from the University of California, Davis

Other:

•

Master’s degree in Business Administration from Harvard University

 

 

Bruce E. Wallace joined us in 2008 as Head of Global Services, where he was responsible for our operations, product management, global transaction banking and service delivery. He was later appointed Chief Operations Officer in 2011, where he was responsible for leading all bank and non-bank operations and information technology services, and in 2015, was appointed to his current role as Chief Digital Officer, where he is responsible for the Company’s digital banking functions and the Company’s fee-based product businesses.

 

Prior Directorships:

•

Director, SPD Silicon Valley Bank, our joint venture bank in China (2012-2015)

 

Other Prior Experience:

•

Senior Vice President and Manager of Treasury Management Operations, Wells Fargo & Company (2005-2008)

•

Various senior management positions in banking operations, Wells Fargo & Company (1987-2005)

 

Education/ Other:

•

Bachelor’s degree in Accounting from California State University, Sacramento

 

 

 

 

 

27

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

Michael S. Zuckert joined us in 2014 as General Counsel, where he is responsible for all our legal matters. Prior to joining us, he served in a wide range of legal positions within the financial services industry. Most recently, he served as Deputy General Counsel of Citigroup from 2009-2014, where he served as general counsel for its non-core assets business, Citi Holdings, and also focused on mergers and acquisitions.

 

Private Directorships:

•

American Red Cross – Bay Area, a non-profit organization providing relief to those affected by disasters (since 2015)

•

Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, a non-profit organization providing free legal services to Silicon Valley individuals in need (since 2015)

 

Other Prior

•

Various senior-level legal positions at Citigroup Inc. (2002-2014)

Experience:

•

Various senior-level positions at Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. (2000-2002 and 1987-1999)

•

Vice President and General Counsel, TheStreet.com, Inc., an online financial news provider (1999-2000)

 

Education/

•

Bachelor’s degree in History and Law and Society from Brown University

Other:

•

Juris Doctor degree from New York University School of Law

 

 

 

 

28

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) discusses our 2015 executive compensation program, as it relates to our five “named executive officers” listed below.

 

 

29

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

 

30

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

 

31

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

 

32

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

				EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES   The key compensation philosophy and objectives of our executive compensation program and practices are as follows:
				Alignment of Pay   with Business Performance and Stockholder Interests		Our executive compensation plans are designed to: •  Tie pay to Company and individual performance through appropriate performance metrics; •  Provide for executive equity ownership to align economic interests with stockholders; •  Provide the opportunity for compensation based upon stockholder returns, relative performance against peers, and key financial measures; and •  Take into account the dynamics of the market and business environment within which the Company and management operate.
				Appropriate Pay Mix		We balance compensation with an appropriate mix of pay between performance-based and non-performance-based pay, as well as long-term and short-term compensation, with emphases on performance-based pay and long-term incentive compensation.
				Maintain Competitive Pay		We pay competitively, relying primarily on external market standards while also considering internal parity and the importance of recruiting and maintaining a cohesive, top-talent executive management team.
				Strong Governance and   Risk Management   Practices		We maintain strong governance practices over our program, including independent Board-level oversight. We also design incentive compensation based on Company and individual performance without encouraging undue risk-taking.
		Our compensation philosophy and program take into consideration our business objectives (including our long-term global growth), the relative complexity this business diversity represents in an organization of our size, stockholder interests, appropriate risk management practices, emerging trends in executive compensation (particularly for financial institutions), applicable regulatory requirements, and market practices.

 

2015 Advisory Vote on 2014 Executive Compensation “Say on Pay”   We submit an advisory vote on executive compensation, or Say on Pay, to our stockholders on an annual basis. In 2015, over 98% of the votes cast approved our 2014 executive compensation program (as described in our 2015 proxy statement). Based on such strong support and the extent of feedback received from our stockholders, the Compensation Committee made no material changes to our compensation philosophy, policies or overall program.   Nevertheless, we continue to carry out our executive compensation program based on our key philosophy and objectives as described above. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider changes to the program on an ongoing basis, as appropriate, in light of evolving factors such as business environment and competition for talent.

 

33

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

Compensation Governance

The Company’s executive compensation program is supported by strong corporate governance and Board-level oversight:

Role of Compensation Committee; Committee Meetings

All members of the Compensation Committee are “independent” under applicable Nasdaq rules. The Compensation Committee has primary oversight of our executive compensation program as provided in its charter, including the design and administration of executive compensation plans in a manner consistent with the executive compensation philosophy described above. The Compensation Committee: (i) reviews and recommends for independent Board approval the compensation of the CEO, and (ii) reviews and approves the compensation of all other non-CEO executive officers. In carrying out its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee regularly reports to the Board on the actions it has taken, as well as confers with the Board on compensation matters, as necessary. The Compensation Committee also makes recommendations for all other compensation-related matters that require full Board approval.

The Compensation Committee meets on a regular basis, and routinely meets in executive session without management present. During 2015, the Compensation Committee held ten (10) meetings, including an extended annual session where the Compensation Committee met with the Board Chair (also Chair of the Risk Committee), as well as key members of executive management, including the CEO, the Chief Financial Officer, the Head of Human Resources and the General Counsel, to discuss considerations for reviewing and enhancing the Company’s compensation strategy.

Role of the Independent Board Members

Subject to the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, all of the independent directors of the Board (all Board members except the CEO) review and approve the compensation for the CEO. Such review and approval are conducted during the executive session portion of the Board’s meetings, where neither the CEO nor any other member of management is present.

Role of Compensation Committee Consultant

The Compensation Committee has retained Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”), an independent executive compensation consultant, to provide advice and recommendations on all compensation matters under its oversight responsibilities as defined in the Compensation Committee’s charter. The Compensation Committee in its sole discretion selects the consultant, and determines its compensation and the scope of its responsibilities.

In 2015, Pay Governance assisted the Compensation Committee with advice and recommendations regarding the Company’s compensation philosophy and strategies; advice on executive and director compensation levels and practices, including review and recommendations on CEO and other executive compensation and evaluation of CEO pay and Company performance; advice on the Company’s 2015 Peer Group; guidance on the design of our compensation plans and executive/director stock ownership guidelines; evaluation of performance metrics and peer performance; assistance with the Compensation Committee’s periodic review of potential risks associated with our compensation programs; recommendations regarding our equity incentive plan; and periodic reports to the Compensation Committee on market and industry compensation trends and regulatory developments. The Compensation Committee did not engage Pay Governance for any additional services outside of executive and director compensation consulting during 2015. In addition, the Compensation Committee does not believe there were any potential conflicts of interest that arose from any work performed by Pay Governance during 2015.

Role of Chief Executive Officer

At the Compensation Committee’s request, our CEO will attend portions of the Compensation Committee’s meetings and executive sessions to discuss the Company’s performance and compensation-related matters. While he does not participate in any deliberations relating to his own compensation, he shares his assessment of the performance of the other executive officers with the Compensation Committee. Based on his assessments and the Company’s overall performance, our CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee on any compensation decisions or changes for the other executive officers. The Compensation Committee considers the CEO’s recommendations, as well as data and analyses provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant (and to a lesser extent, management), but retains full discretion to approve, or recommend for the independent members of the Board to approve, all executive compensation.

 

34

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

Competitive Benchmarking Against Peers

2015 Peer Group				2015 Peer Group
Associated Banc-Corp   BOK Financial Corp   City National Corp.*   Comerica Incorporated   Commerce Bancshares, Inc.   Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.   East West Bancorp, Inc.   FirstMerit Corporation   First Republic Bancorp   Huntington Bancshares   Investors Bancorp, Inc.   MB Financial, Inc.   Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.   Signature Bank   Umpqua Holdings Corporation   Webster Financial Corp.   Zions Bancorporation				Consistent with 2014, for 2015, the Compensation Committee benchmarked and compared our compensation and performance with our peer companies. Our 2015 Peer Group companies are companies that are similarly-sized, have certain business model similarities, and compete with us for our talent. (A list of our 17 peer group companies used for 2015 is set forth at the left.)   Annual Peer Group Review   The Compensation Committee, with its compensation consultant and management, reviews on at least an annual basis, the composition of the 2015 Peer Group. In determining the composition, the Compensation Committee considers various factors and characteristics including, but not limited to, market capitalization, asset size, assets under management, number of employees, business model and complexity of the platform, and performance on financial and market-based measures.   The 2015 Peer Group was updated from 2014 as follows: (i) added Comerica Incorporated, Huntington Bancshares and Zions Bancorporation, due to similar business models; and (ii) removed Bank of Hawaii Corporation, First Citizens Bancshares, Inc., PacWest Bancorp, TCF Financial Corporation, UMB Financial Corporation and Valley National Bancorp, due to their different business models and/or market focus.

It is important to note that in determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee does not solely rely on comparative data from the 2015 Peer Group. Such comparative data provides helpful market information about our peer companies, but the Compensation Committee does not target any specific positioning or percentile, nor does it use a formulaic approach, in determining executive pay levels. The Compensation Committee also utilizes other resources, including published compensation surveys and proxy data. All such comparative peer data and supplemental resources are considered, along with the Company’s pay for performance and internal parity objectives. All applicable information is reviewed and considered in aggregate, and the Compensation Committee does not place any particular weighting on any one factor.

 

 

*	Acquired during 2015; for performance benchmarking purposes, we replaced this company with the performance average of the applicable metric of the other peer companies at the end of 2015.

 

35

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

2015 Executive Compensation

Summary of 2015 Key Executive Compensation Components

 

		Component and  Purpose		2015 Key Highlights
				General		CEO		Other NEOs
Short-Term Cash Compensation		Base Salary   Provides ongoing fixed cash pay.		---		4.0% merit increase		5-7% merit increase, except for CFO who received 14.3% increase due to exceptional performance and span of responsibilities
		Annual Cash Incentives   Provides short-term (annual) performance-based cash incentive compensation opportunity under our ICP.		No material changes to funding methodology for 2015: ¡     2/3 of the pool based on ROE performance against our annual target ROE; and ¡    1/3 of the pool based on relative ROE performance against peer performance.		Annual ICP target increased from 80% to 90% based on market benchmarking.		Annual ICP targets stayed at prior year’s level or was increased to 60% due to market benchmarking and internal parity.
				Based on the Company’s ROE performance above its annual target and its ranking against its peers, as well as the Company’s overall performance, 156% of the 2015 executive incentive pool was funded.		For 2015, actual CEO ICP was 150% of target payout.		For 2015, actual ICP received ranged from 148% to 182% of target payout.
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation		Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units (“PRSUs”)   Provides incentives to motivate and retain executives and to reward for our performance relative to peers based on certain specific metrics.		PRSUs vest subject to performance over a 3-year period based on (each 50% of the award): (i) the Company’s TSR performance relative to peers; and (ii) the Company’s ROE and Selected Fee Income performance.		2015 allocation (based on the total value of all equity awards) increased from 34% to 50%
		Stock Options   Provides incentives for long-term creation of stockholder value over a four-year period.		All awards are subject to standard annual vesting over a four-year period		2015 allocation (based on the total value of all equity awards) decreased from 46% to 25%
		Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)   Provides incentives for retention and long-term creation of stockholder value over a four-year period.				2015 allocation (based on the total value of all equity awards) increased from 20% to 25%

 

36

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

Elements of 2015 Compensation

Base Salary

We provide base salaries in order to provide executives with a reasonable level of fixed short-term compensation. Executive base salary levels are typically reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committee and adjusted as appropriate, typically as merit increases, promotions or changes in responsibilities, or market adjustments. Base salaries are determined on an individual basis. When determining any base salary increases, the Compensation Committee considers an individual’s total compensation package, his or her performance, Company performance, comparative peer and market compensation data, internal parity, and other relevant factors, including the scope of the executive’s responsibilities relative to peers and other executives, and retention concerns.

 

 

 

Annual Cash Incentives

Our executives participate in the Company’s Incentive Compensation Plan (“ICP”), an annual cash incentive plan that rewards performance against individual and Company objectives.

 

ICP Funding

Each year, the Compensation Committee establishes one or more metrics that it will use to measure Company performance for ICP funding purposes. Based on those metrics and overall Company performance, the Compensation Committee will also determine the extent to which the Company will fund the incentive pool.

For 2015, the Compensation Committee utilized the same methodology for funding the ICP as in 2014 in all material respects. The Compensation Committee continued to believe that return on equity (“ROE”) is an appropriate indicator of financial

 

37

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

performance that drives stockholder value, especially if performance is measured against the Company’s target objectives, as well as peer performance. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee continued to apply the following two performance metrics:

 

¡  ROE Against our Annual Target ROE (Two-Thirds (2/3) of Pool) - Two-thirds (2/3) of the total incentive pool is funded based on the Company’s performance relative to our Board-approved annual target ROE. The graph to the right illustrates the relationship in 2015 between: (i) achieved (but adjusted for the exclusions discussed below) ROE of 11.08% as a percentage of our annual target ROE (which was budgeted for 2015 at 9.53%), and (ii) the percentage of the target incentive pool accrued. There is a funding maximum of 200% of target (for achievement of 150% or over of our target ROE).   In addition, the Compensation Committee retains discretion to determine the extent to which the Company met its ICP performance target, including discretion to consider adjustments for certain out of the ordinary or non-recurring items. Adjustments are determined by the Compensation Committee, in consultation with the Audit Committee.   For 2015 and consistent with prior years, the Compensation Committee excluded 50% of the gains on non-marketable securities over budget (net of noncontrolling interests), since such gains are subject to market performance. In addition, for 2015, the Compensation Committee excluded certain immaterial gains attributable to an adjustment to foreign exchange losses recognized in 2014 relating to the sale of the Company’s India business.    ¡  ROE Against Peer Group (One-Third (1/3) of Pool) - One third (1/3) of the total incentive pool is funded based on the Company’s ROE performance relative to the 2015 Peer Group. As illustrated in the graph to the right, there is no payout if our performance falls in certain bottom positions, and a payout maximum in the top three positions.		The Compensation Committee retains discretion to fund up to 50% of the target ICP pool for performance below the 90% threshold, if and when it believes that making partial ICP payments are in the Company’s interests. This pool is provisional and in no way does it represent a form of guaranteed incentive funding.   Our ranking is based on our full year 2015 ROE performance, compared to the ROE performance of our 2015 Peer Group from the fourth quarter 2014 through the third quarter 2015, due to the timing and availability of peer performance information.

For 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that: (i) 2/3 of the executive ICP pool would be funded at 132% of target, based on the Company’s ROE performance, as adjusted, after taking into account the adjustments as discussed above; and (ii) 1/3 of the executive ICP pool would be funded at 183% of target, based on the Company’s relative ROE performance, ranking in the fourth position (76^th percentile) against the 2015 Peer Group. In addition to these two ROE metrics, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the overall strong performance of the Company and the executive team in 2015. In particular, they took into consideration: overall strong executive leadership as a team; exceptional annual financial performance, including, in particular, EPS and net income increases and strong financial growth in assets, loans and client fund balances; strong overall performance relative to peers; continued progress towards global growth; and continued focus on risk management. As a result, the Compensation Committee approved funding the overall executive ICP pool at 156% of total target.

 

38

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

In determining such 2015 awards, the Board considered Mr. Becker’s performance assessment conducted by the independent members of the Board, and the Compensation Committee considered the performance assessments of each of the other NEOs as conducted by Mr. Becker, as well as input from the independent members of the Board.

In addition, the independent members of the Board (with respect to Mr. Becker) and the Compensation Committee (with respect to the other NEOs) considered a variety of factors that they believed to be relevant, including: (i) the performance of the respective areas of oversight of each NEO, and (ii) each NEO’s contributions to our business and financial results, execution of our 2015 corporate initiatives, and broader leadership within the organization. Specifically for Mr. Becker, certain factors considered included:

 

•

Strong 2015 profitability and financial performance:

¡

Annual EPS increase by 24.7%

¡

Annual net income available to common stockholders increase by 30.3%

•

Strong Company growth:

¡

Total average asset growth by 23.9%

¡

Total average loan balances (net of unearned income) increase by 28.3%

¡

Total average deposit and total client investment fund balance growth by 28.2% and 30.6%, respectively

¡

Continued growth in non-GAAP core fee income* of 26.8% (see Appendix A)

•

Growth in market share; 18% increase in net client count

•

Continued global growth

•

Continued focus on enterprise-wide risk management

•

Expansion and enhancement of executive leadership team

 

 

 

39

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

Long-Term Equity Incentives

 

		The Company believes that equity-based awards, particularly in combination with the Company’s equity ownership guidelines as discussed below, tie each of the NEOs’ compensation to the Company’s long-term financial performance and align the interests of the NEOs and our stockholders.   In 2015, the Compensation Committee continued to focus on long-term, sustainable performance and alignment with stockholder interests. Accordingly, based on its review of peer benchmarking comparisons, the committee continued its emphasis on long-term equity compensation, shifting more of the allocation of equity awards from stock options to PRSUs and to a lesser extent, RSUs. The Compensation Committee determined a target equity award total value for each NEO based on peer benchmarking comparisons, and granted a mix of performance-based and non-performance based equity awards based on the 2015 allocation as set forth to the left.   Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)   Stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) are subject to annual vesting over a four-year period. The stock options have a maximum term of seven years. No additional performance-based criteria were established, as the increase in the value of these stock options, and the value of the RSUs, are inherently tied to the future performance of the Company’s Common Stock. 2015 stock option and RSU grants were made effective as of May 1, 2015.

Performance-based Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs)

Performance-based restricted stock units (PRSUs) are earned based on the achievement of certain performance conditions, as determined by the Compensation Committee. After the end of the specified performance period, the Compensation Committee will determine whether (and to what extent) the NEOs had earned the PRSUs, based on the Company’s Relative TSR, ROE and Selected Fee Income performance. The PRSUs are subject to a maximum total payout at 150% of target award. No payout is made if the Company ranks in the bottom five peer companies.

Similar to 2014, for 2015, PRSUs are subject to performance-based vesting over a three-year period (from 2015 through 2017). To the extent earned, PRSUs are subject to additional time-based vesting through January 30, 2018. 2015 PRSU grants were made effective as of March 30, 2015. Additionally for 2015, the Compensation Committee designed the PRSUs to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code by subjecting the awards to the following performance conditions:

 

¡  Relative TSR Against 2015 Peer Group (50% of Award). Fifty percent of the PRSU award is funded and earned (subject to time-based vesting) based on the Company’s TSR performance as ranked against the 2015 Peer Group (“Relative TSR”). The Compensation Committee may apply negative discretion to reduce the actual award, as it deems appropriate.   The Compensation Committee selected Relative TSR as a key PRSU performance metric because it correlates directly with the Company’s stock price performance and hence, is aligned with stockholder interests.   For 2015 only, the Company ranked in the 6th position (65th percentile) against the 2015 Peer Group.

 

40

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

¡

ROE Funding Threshold and Selected Fee Income Target (50% of Award).

 

•

The other fifty percent of the PRSU award is funded at a maximum 150% payout subject to the Company’s achievement of a three-year annual average ROE performance threshold of 5% or higher. (No funding below 5%.) The Compensation Committee may apply negative discretion to reduce the actual funding, as it deems appropriate.

 

•

If the ROE performance threshold is achieved and funding has been established, the Committee will, as it deems appropriate, determine the extent of the award earned based on the Company’s performance against the three-year annual average of its budgeted annual income from foreign exchange fees and credit card fees (“Selected Fee Income”). The budgeted income targets shall be specified in the Company’s overall annual budget as approved by the Board of Directors.

The Compensation Committee determined Selected Fee Income as an additional PRSU performance metric mainly due to the desire to diversify the Company’s sources of income, in particular, non-interest income. Our foreign exchange and credit card-based businesses are key parts of our business targeted for growth.

 

2015 represents the first year of a three-year performance period, hence none of the PRSUs granted in 2015 have been earned.

The Compensation Committee typically makes equity awards to each NEO at the time the individual is hired or promoted, and annually thereafter. The size of the awards reflects the overall number of shares available to the Company under our equity incentive plan, the Compensation Committee’s determination of an appropriate annual equity burn rate (the percentage of total shares outstanding that the Company has issued during the year in the form of equity compensation), the NEO’s role and performance, and the market compensation data for the NEO’s external peers.

Executive Benefits

Employee Retirement Benefits

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in our SVB Financial Group 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan, our qualified retirement and profit sharing plan that is generally available to all of the Company’s U.S. employees. Our NEOs participate in the plan on the same terms as all other eligible employees. Other than our 401(k) plan, SVB Financial Group does not provide any pension, excess retirement, or SERPs to our NEOs.

Under our 401(k) plan, our U.S. employees, including our NEOs, may make voluntary pre-tax and/or Roth post-tax deferrals up to the maximum provided for by IRS regulations. The Company provides dollar-for-dollar matching contributions up to a maximum of 5% of cash compensation or the Internal Revenue Section 401(a) compensation limit, whichever is less. Company 401(k) matching contributions vest immediately upon deposit into the individual’s 401(k) account.

The plan also includes a profit sharing component — the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”). Under the ESOP, we may make discretionary annual contributions for U.S. employees, as determined by the Compensation Committee. ESOP

 

41

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

contributions may be in the form of cash, the Company’s Common Stock, or a combination of both, and are subject to certain vesting conditions. Contributions are determined based on the Company’s performance and are not adjusted to reflect individual performance.

Similar to 2014, for 2015, the Compensation Committee established performance criteria based on the Company’s ROE, similar to the ICP, to fund the ESOP contribution, and set the funding level to a 2.5% (of eligible compensation) funding level based on target ROE performance, up to a maximum funding of 5%. Based on the Company’s 2015 above-target ROE performance, the Compensation Committee approved a contribution of 3.3% of eligible compensation in cash (50%) and the Company’s Common Stock (50%) for all eligible participants.

Deferred Compensation

We do not provide NEOs with any Company-funded deferred compensation benefits. However, in order to help them achieve their retirement objectives, we offer each NEO the opportunity to tax-defer a portion of their income, beyond what is allowed to be deferred in the Company’s qualified retirement plan. Specifically, under our Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”), each individual may defer 5% to 50% of their base pay and 5% to 100% of eligible incentive payments during each plan year. The DCP is an unfunded plan, and participating executives bear the risk of forfeiture in the event that we cannot fund DCP liabilities. We do not match executive deferrals to the DCP, nor do we make any other contributions to the DCP. See “Compensation for Named Executive Officers—Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” below.

We establish and maintain a bookkeeping account for each participant which reflects compensation deferrals made by the executive along with any associated earnings, expenses, gains and losses. The amount in a participant’s account is adjusted for hypothetical investment earnings or losses in an amount equivalent to the gains or losses reported by the investment options selected by the participant from among the investment options designated for this purpose by the Company. A participant may, in accordance with rules and procedures we establish, change the investments to be used for the purpose of calculating future hypothetical investment adjustments to the participant’s account. The account of each participant is adjusted each business day to reflect: (a) the hypothetical investment earnings and/or losses described above; (b) participant deferrals; and (c) distributions or withdrawals from the account. Distributions or withdrawals from the DCP shall be made in full accordance with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. No NEOs participated in the DCP in 2015. Among the NEOs, only Mr. Becker holds a balance due to deferrals made under the plan in 2005.

Health and Welfare Benefits

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in our standard health and welfare benefits program, which provides medical, dental, life, accident, and disability coverage to all of our eligible U.S.-based employees. We do not provide executives with any health and welfare benefits that are not generally available to other Company employees.

Time Away From Work

Under our “time away from work” policy, U.S. exempt employees, including our NEOs, do not accrue vacation benefits. Rather, such employees are expected to manage their time away from work, subject to the demands and needs of their jobs. Non-exempt U.S. employees and other non-U.S. employees continue to accrue vacation benefits formulaically.

Executive Termination Benefits

See “Compensation for Named Executive Officers—Other Post-Employment Payments” below.

Perquisites

We do not have any executive perquisite programs. From time to time, on a limited or exception basis, we may provide other benefits that we believe are related to a business purpose or are customary outside of the U.S. that may otherwise be considered perquisites. We disclose those benefits as required by applicable rules.

Stock Option and Other Equity Practices

Grant Practices for Executive Officers

The Compensation Committee approved all equity grants in 2015 made to executive officers of the Company, except that the independent members of the Board approved equity grants made to the Chief Executive Officer. Except for awards that qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code (as defined below) which are awarded during the first quarter of the year, annual equity compensation grants to executives have typically been approved during the second quarter of the year. Grants are made effective during an open trading window pursuant to our Insider Trading Policy, with limited

 

42

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

exceptions. The exercise price for stock option grants is equal to the closing market price on the grant’s effective date and grants typically have an annual vesting period of four years, subject to continued employment or service. All 2015 grants to our NEOs were made in accordance with this practice.

For newly-hired executive officers, the Compensation Committee approves an equity grant amount prior to, or shortly after, the executive’s start of employment, and the effective grant date is typically set during an open trading window after such executive commences employment. This approach provides for the exercise price of stock options to reflect a fair market price, since the exercise price for stock option grants is equal to the closing market price on the grant’s effective date.

Grant Practices for Other Employees

The Board has delegated authority to the Equity Awards Committee to make equity grants to non-executive employees under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The Equity Awards Committee is a committee of two, comprised of our Chief Executive Officer and the Chair of our Board. The Equity Awards Committee may not make equity grants to executives or any non-executive employee that reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer.

The Equity Awards Committee may make grants only within established individual employee and aggregate share limits and in accordance with established requirements regarding the term, vesting period, exercise price and other terms and conditions for the grant. In addition, all grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock units made by the Equity Awards Committee must be made (or become effective) on the first Monday of the month following approval or, where the first Monday is a Company-observed U.S. holiday, on the first Tuesday of such month. The Equity Awards Committee approves grants on a quarterly basis, and must approve all grants in writing on or before the date of grant, subject to the respective employee remaining an employee as of the date of grant. Finally, management updates the Compensation Committee regarding all grants made by the Equity Awards Committee on a regular basis. Any grant that does not meet the requirements established for the Equity Awards Committee must be made by the Board, the Compensation Committee or other authorized committee.

The Compensation Committee typically approves annual grants to all eligible employees, as well as any other grants that the Equity Awards Committee is not authorized to approve.

Prohibitions Against Hedging

Pursuant to our Insider Trading Policy, our directors, executive officers (including our NEOs) and employees are not permitted to “hedge” ownership by selling puts in or selling short any of the Company’s publicly-traded securities at any time. Additionally, we discourage, and have not permitted, any of our executive officers to pledge, or use as collateral, our securities to secure personal loans or other obligations.

Compensation Recovery Policies

Except as noted below, our Compensation Committee has not yet adopted a policy with respect to whether we will make retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity based incentive compensation paid to our NEOs or other employees where the payment was based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently revised. Our Compensation Committee intends to adopt a general compensation recovery policy after the SEC adopts final rules implementing the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. In 2015, our Compensation Committee approved an amendment to our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan to provide that equity awards granted under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan will be subject to the terms and conditions of any compensation recovery policy adopted by the Company and as may be in effect from time to time.

Section 162(m)

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) limits our deductibility of compensation paid to our CEO and each of the next three most highly compensated executive officers (excluding the Chief Financial Officer) in excess of $1,000,000, but excludes “performance-based compensation” from this limit. Our stock options, as well as beginning for the year 2015, our executives’ PRSU awards, qualify for this tax deductibility. However, in order to maintain flexibility and promote simplicity in the Compensation Committee’s administration of and oversight over executive compensation arrangements, other compensation arrangements, such as time-based restricted stock units that vest based solely on continued service and ICP payments, do not qualify for tax deductibility. This design allows the Compensation Committee to balance tax deductibility with other business priorities that affect stockholder value.

Compensation that qualify as “performance-based” under Section 162(m) are also reviewed and approved by an independent committee of the Board of Directors, comprised of Mr. Dunbar, our Board Chair, and Mr. Robinson, our Audit Committee Chair and member of the Compensation Committee.

 

43

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

Equity Ownership Guidelines for Executive Officers

The Company maintains stock ownership guidelines for the Company’s executive officers, including the NEOs. These stock ownership guidelines reflect the Board’s belief in the importance of aligning the economic interests of stockholders and management.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting and periodically reviewing the guidelines. Guidelines for each executive position are determined based on factors including the executive role, scope of responsibilities, base salary levels, Company stock price performance and market data. The current equity ownership guidelines applicable to executive officers are based on the value of the Company’s Common Stock as a percentage of annual base salary, as follows:

 

		Stock Value as Percentage of Annual  Base Salary
Chief Executive Officer		600%
Chief Credit Officer Chief Digital Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Operations Officer Chief Risk Officer Head EMEA & President UK Branch Head of Relationship Banking Head of Specialty Banking		300%
Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer General Counsel Head of Human Resources		200%

All executive officers have five years to attain the minimum level of ownership.

The Governance Committee monitors compliance with these guidelines and reviews executive equity holdings on a quarterly basis. In evaluating whether executives are meeting the ownership guidelines, the Governance Committee considers the following as shares owned: (1) shares actually held, (2) shares owned through investment in the Company’s stock fund in the SVB Financial Group 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and (3) earned but unvested awards of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units (subject to either time-based or performance-based vesting). Neither vested nor unvested stock options count towards the ownership guidelines. Exceptions to meeting the guidelines due to personal financial or other reasons are reviewed and determined by the Governance Committee.

As of December 31, 2015, all of our NEOs were in compliance with the applicable ownership guidelines.

 

44

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our NEOs for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015.

 

Name and Principal Position		Year				Salary          ($)				Bonus     ($) (1)				Stock Awards         ($) (2)				Stock Option Awards         ($) (2)				Non-Equity Incentive Plan     Compensation     ($) (3)						All Other Compensation         ($)(4)				Total     ($)
Greg Becker,			2015				912,333				-				2,092,890				670,964				1,225,000						25,947     (5)				4,927,134
President and Chief			2014				869,167				-				1,175,470				1,070,211				935,000						22,924     (6)				4,072,772
Executive Officer			2013				835,613				-				1,336,868				867,018				925,000						22,389     (7)				3,986,888
Michael Descheneaux,			2015				592,885				-				837,104				268,394				575,000						22,508     (8)				2,295,891
Chief Financial Officer			2014				520,833				600				517,225				470,896				425,000						21,347     (9)				1,955,901
			2013				499,780				-				739,544				474,665				450,000						22,389   (10)				2,186,378
John China,			2015				479,308				-				456,520				146,366				525,000						24,383   (11)				1,631,577
Head of Relationship			2014				437,500				600				282,044				256,837				380,000						21,890   (12)				1,378,871
Banking			2013				373,113				-				412,438				235,961				1,072,500			(13)			22,389   (14)				2,116,401
Joan Parsons,			2015				479,308				-				456,520				146,366				425,000						23,680   (15)				1,530,874
Head of Specialty			2014				441,667				600				282,044				256,837				380,000						24,067   (16)				1,385,215
Banking			2013				399,780				-				405,327				257,910				350,000						22,389   (17)				1,435,406
Bruce Wallace,			2015				449,872				-				456,520				146,366				440,000						22,609   (18)				1,515,367
Chief Digital Officer			2014				420,833				600				282,044				256,837				260,000						21,455   (19)				1,241,769
			2013				398,113				-				398,216				257,910				350,000						22,389   (20)				1,426,628

 

 

(1)	Reflects the value of a cash gift card given to the executive in 2014.

(2)

Values indicated for equity awards reflect the fair value of grants made during the fiscal year. Such values were computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC Topic 718”). The amounts disclosed may never be realized. Assumptions used in calculating these amounts are included in the note entitled “Share-Based Compensation” in our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the applicable year. The amounts disclosed under the “Stock Awards” column also include the fair value grants of certain performance-based restricted stock unit awards reported based on achievement at target level. Such awards are subject to a maximum of 150% of target level. For details of 2015 grants, see “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” below.

(3)	Includes: (a) ICP payments; and (b) for 2013, Mr. China’s one-time long term cash retention award.

(4)

In addition to the amounts discussed in the following footnotes, included in this column for 2015 are reimbursement payments of income taxes incurred by the NEOs on imputed income (“Imputed Income Tax Reimbursements”). For 2015, such imputed income was primarily associated with spousal travel and attendance to our business events where our NEOs’ spouses or significant others were invited, and expected, to attend.

(5)	Other compensation for Mr. Becker in 2015 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $8,745; (b) 401(k) Plan matching contribution (“401(k) Match”) of $13,250; and (c) Imputed Income Tax Reimbursement of $3,952.

(6)	Other compensation for Mr. Becker in 2014 includes: (a) ESOP contribution of $7,800; and (b) 401(k) Match of $13,000.

(7)	Other compensation for Mr. Becker in 2013 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $9,639; and (b) 401(k) Match of $12,750.

(8)	Other compensation for Mr. Descheneaux in 2015 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $8,745; (b) 401(k) Match of $13,250; and (c) Imputed Income Tax Reimbursement of $513.

(9)	Other compensation for Mr. Descheneaux in 2014 includes: (a) ESOP contribution of $7,800; and (b) 401(k) Match of $13,000.

(10)	Other compensation for Mr. Descheneaux in 2013 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $9,639; (b) and 401(k) Match of $12,750.

(11)	Other compensation for Mr. China in 2015 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $8,745; (b) 401(k) Match of $13,250; and (c) Imputed Income Tax Reimbursement of $2,388.

(12)	Other compensation for Mr. China in 2014 includes: (a) ESOP contribution of $7,800; and (b) 401(k) Match of $13,000.

(13)	Non-equity incentive plan compensation for Mr. China in 2013 is comprised of: (a) one-time long term cash retention award of $597,500; and (b) ICP payment of $475,000.

(14)	Other compensation for Mr. China in 2013 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $9,639; and (b) 401(k) Match of $12,750.

(15)	Other compensation for Ms. Parsons in 2015 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $8,745; (b) 401(k) Match of $13,250; and (c) Imputed Income Tax Reimbursement of $1,685.

(16)	Other compensation for Ms. Parsons in 2014 includes: (a) ESOP contribution of $7,800; and (b) 401(k) Match of $13,000.

(17)	Other compensation for Ms. Parsons in 2013 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $9,639; and (b) 401(k) Match of $12,750.

(18)	Other compensation for Mr. Wallace in 2015 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $8,745; (b) 401(k) Match of $13,250; and (c) Imputed Income Tax Reimbursement of $614.

(19)	Other compensation for Mr. Wallace in 2014 includes: (a) ESOP contribution of $7,800; and (b) 401(k) Match of $13,000.

(20)	Other compensation for Mr. Wallace in 2013 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $9,639; and (b) 401(k) Match of $12,750.

 

45

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth all plan-based awards, including both equity awards and non-equity incentive awards under plans, made to our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

							Compensation Committee or Board Approval Date					Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)															Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2)															All Other Stock Awards; Number of Shares of Stock or Units (3)					All Other Option Awards; Number of Securities Underlying Options					Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards (4)					Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(5)
Name		Grant Date										Threshold ($)					Target ($)					Maximum ($)					Threshold (#)					Target (#)					Maximum (#)
Greg Becker		January 22, 2015					January 22, 2015							-					819,000					-					-					-					-					-					-				$	-				$	-
Greg Becker		March 30, 2015					March 27, 2015							-					-					-					5,500					11,000					16,500					-					-					-					1,395,680
Greg Becker		May 1, 2015					March 27, 2015							-					-					-					-					-					-					5,371					-					-					697,210
Greg Becker		May 1, 2015					March 27, 2015							-					-					-					-					-					-					-					16,237					129.81					670,964
Michael Descheneaux		January 22, 2015					January 22, 2015							-					360,000					-					-					-					-					-					-					-					-
Michael Descheneaux		March 30, 2015					March 19, 2015							-					-					-					2,200					4,400					6,600					-					-					-					558,272
Michael Descheneaux		May 1, 2015					March 19, 2015							-					-					-					-					-					-					2,148					-					-					278,832
Michael Descheneaux		May 1, 2015					March 19, 2015							-					-					-					-					-					-					-					6,495					129.81					268,394
John China		January 22, 2015					January 22, 2015							-					288,000					-					-					-					-					-					-					-					-
John China		March 30, 2015					March 19, 2015							-					-					-					1,200					2,400					3,600					-					-					-					304,512
John China		May 1, 2015					March 19, 2015							-					-					-					-					-					-					1,171					-					-					152,008
John China		May 1, 2015					March 19, 2015							-					-					-					-					-					-					-					3,542					129.81					146,366
Joan Parsons		January 22, 2015					January 22, 2015							-					288,000					-					-					-					-					-					-					-					-
Joan Parsons		March 30, 2015					March 19, 2015							-					-					-					1,200					2,400					3,600					-					-					-					304,512
Joan Parsons		May 1, 2015					March 19, 2015							-					-					-					-					-					-					1,171					-					-					152,008
Joan Parsons		May 1, 2015					March 19, 2015							-					-					-					-					-					-					-					3,542					129.81					146,366
Bruce Wallace		January 22, 2015					January 22, 2015							-					270,000					-					-					-					-					-					-					-					-
Bruce Wallace		March 30, 2015					March 19, 2015							-					-					-					1,200					2,400					3,600					-					-					-					304,512
Bruce Wallace		May 1, 2015					March 19, 2015							-					-					-					-					-					-					1,171					-					-					152,008
Bruce Wallace		May 1, 2015					March 19, 2015							-					-					-					-					-					-					-					3,542					129.81					146,366

 

 

(1)	The ICP amounts represent target levels; there are no individual threshold or maximum amounts.

(2)

For the performance-based restricted stock unit grants to the NEOs made in 2015, the performance achievement will be determined as of December 31, 2017 for the 2015-2017 performance period based upon the performance criteria presented under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Equity Incentives” above.

(3)	The stock awards reported above reflect restricted stock unit awards granted to each NEO.

(4)	The exercise price of the stock option awards is reported in the table.

(5)

The fair values reported above are also reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” under the “Stock Awards” and “Stock Option Awards” columns. Amounts shown represent the grant date fair values of awards of stock options and stock awards granted in the fiscal year indicated which were computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation (“ASC Topic 718”). The amounts disclosed may never be realized. Assumptions used in calculating these amounts are included in the note entitled “Stockholders’ Equity” of our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the applicable year.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth the number of securities underlying equity awards that vested (in the case of restricted shares) or were exercised (in the case of stock options) by the NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2015, and the value realized upon such vesting or exercise.

 

		OPTION AWARDS								STOCK AWARDS
Name		Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise				Value Realized on Exercise				Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting				Value Realized on Vesting
Greg Becker			42,962			$	3,102,893				39,758			$	4,980,320
Michael Descheneaux			17,767				1,286,517				11,444				1,406,322
John China			2,064				158,381				5,679				694,038
Joan Parsons			-				-				6,342				779,882
Bruce Wallace			8,836				548,706				6,042				741,358

 

46

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following tables set forth all outstanding equity awards to the NEOs as of December 31, 2015. The exercise price for each of the stock option grants reported below is equal to the closing market price on the grant date. The vesting schedule for each outstanding equity award is provided in the footnotes to the tables below. Outstanding stock awards are valued based upon the closing market price of our stock as of December 31, 2015, which was $118.90 per share.

 

		OPTION AWARDS																				STOCK AWARDS
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (# Exercisable)				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (# Unexercisable)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options				Option Exercise Price (per option)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
Greg Becker			13,894				-				-			$	60.37				April 27, 2018				-				-				1,300	(5)		$	154,570
			12,486				7,025	(1)			-				64.37				May 1, 2019				-				-				4,400	(6)			523,160
			13,028				15,800	(2)			-				71.11				April 30, 2020				-				-				3,024	(7)			359,554
			6,086				18,257	(3)			-				107.98				April 29, 2021				-				-				5,371	(8)			638,612
			-				16,237	(4)			-				129.81				May 1, 2022				-				-				10,281	(9)			1,222,411
																							-				-				16,500	(10)			1,961,850

 

 

(1)	7,025 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(2)	7,900 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 7,900 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(3)	6,086 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 6,086 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 6,085 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(4)	4,060 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 4,059 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 4,059 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 4,059 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(5)	1,300 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(6)	2,200 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 2,200 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(7)	1,008 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 1,008 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 1,008 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(8)	1,343 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 1,343 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 1,343 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 1,342 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(9)	10,281 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2017 (maximum of 150% of target).

(10)	16,500 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2018 (maximum of 150% of target).

 

		OPTION AWARDS																				STOCK AWARDS
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (# Exercisable)				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (# Unexercisable)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options				Option Exercise Price (per option)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
Michael Descheneaux			2,500				-				-			$	45.19				July 27, 2017				-				-				775	(5)		$	92,148
			8,000				-				-				60.37				April 27, 2018				-				-				2,450	(6)			291,305
			9,050				4,350	(1)			-				64.37				May 1, 2019				-				-				1,330	(7)			158,137
			6,650				8,650	(2)			-				71.11				April 30, 2020				-				-				2,148	(8)			255,397
			2,678				8,033	(3)			-				107.98				April 29, 2021				-				-				4,524	(9)			537,904
			-				6,495	(4)			-				129.81				May 1, 2022				-				-				6,600	(10)			784,740

 

 

(1)	4,350 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(2)	4,325 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 4,325 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(3)	2,678 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 2,678 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 2,677 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(4)	1,624 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 1,624 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 1,624 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 1,623 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(5)	775 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(6)	1,225 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 1,225 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(7)	444 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 443 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 443 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(8)	537 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 537 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 537 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 537 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(9)	4,524 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2017 (maximum of 150% of target).

(10)	6,600 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2018 (maximum of 150% of target).

 

47

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

		OPTION AWARDS																				STOCK AWARDS
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (# Exercisable)				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (# Unexercisable)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options				Option Exercise Price (per option)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
John China			3,704				-				-			$	19.48				April 28, 2016				-				-				300	(5)		$	35,670
			2,500				-				-				49.18				April 30, 2017				-				-				1,550	(6)			184,295
			2,520				-				-				54.88				January 3, 2018				-				-				725	(7)			86,203
			4,950				1,650	(1)			-				64.37				May 1, 2019				-				-				1,171	(8)			139,232
			4,300				4,300	(2)			-				71.11				April 30, 2020				-				-				2,467	(9)			293,326
			1,461				4,381	(3)			-				107.98				April 29, 2021				-				-				3,600	(10)			428,040
			-				3,542	(4)			-				129.81				May 1, 2022

 

 

(1)	1,650 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(2)	2,150 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 2,150 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(3)	1,461 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 1,460 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 1,460 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(4)	886 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 886 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 885 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 885 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(5)	300 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(6)	775 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 775 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(7)	242 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 242 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 241 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(8)	293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 292 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(9)	2,467 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2017 (maximum of 150% of target).

(10)	3,600 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2018 (maximum of 150% of target).

 

		OPTION AWARDS																				STOCK AWARDS
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (# Exercisable)				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (# Unexercisable)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options				Option Exercise Price (per option)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
Joan Parsons			171				-				-			$	43.53				October 26, 2017				-				-				425	(5)		$	50,533
			1,750				-				-				60.37				April 27, 2018				-				-				1,350	(6)			160,515
			2,300				2,300	(1)			-				64.37				May 1, 2019				-				-				725	(7)			86,203
			2,350				4,700	(2)			-				71.11				April 30, 2020				-				-				1,171	(8)			139,232
			1,461				4,381	(3)			-				107.98				April 29, 2021				-				-				2,467	(9)			293,326
			-				3,542	(4)			-				129.81				May 1, 2022				-				-				3,600	(10)			428,040

 

 

(1)	2,300 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(2)	2,350 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 2,350 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(3)	1,461 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 1,460 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 1,460 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(4)	886 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 886 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 885 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 885 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(5)	425 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(6)	675 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 675 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(7)	242 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 242 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 241 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(8)	293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 292 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(9)	2,467 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2017 (maximum of 150% of target).

(10)	3,600 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2018 (maximum of 150% of target).

 

48

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

		OPTION AWARDS																				STOCK AWARDS
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (# Exercisable)				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (# Unexercisable)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options				Option Exercise Price (per option)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
Bruce Wallace			2,250				2,250	(1)			-			$	64.37				May 1, 2019				-				-				400	(5)		$	47,560
			-				4,700	(2)			-				71.11				April 30, 2020				-				-				1,300	(6)			154,570
			-				4,381	(3)			-				107.98				April 29, 2021				-				-				725	(7)			86,203
			-				3,542	(4)			-				129.81				May 1, 2022				-				-				1,171	(8)			139,232
																							-				-				2,467	(9)			293,326
																							-				-				3,600	(10)			428,040

 

 

(1)	2,250 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(2)	2,350 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 2,350 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(3)	1,461 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 1,460 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 1,460 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(4)	886 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 886 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 885 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 885 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(5)	400 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(6)	650 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 650 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(7)	242 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 242 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 241 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(8)	293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 292 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(9)	2,467 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2017 (maximum of 150% of target).

(10)	3,600 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2018 (maximum of 150% of target).

Pension Benefits

We do not maintain any defined benefit pension plans in which any of our executive officers participate.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

The following table sets forth information about executive contributions to, earnings from, and distributions of non-qualified deferred compensation under our Deferred Compensation Plan. There were no above-market or preferential earnings on any compensation that was deferred. We do not maintain any other non-qualified deferred compensation program for our NEOs.

 

Name		Executive Contributions in Last FY				Registrant Contributions in Last FY				Aggregate Earnings in Last FY				Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions				Aggregate Balance at December 31, 2015
Greg Becker (1)			-				-			($	1,131	)			-			$	171,890
Michael Descheneaux			-				-				-				-				-
John China			-				-				-				-				-
Joan Parsons			-				-				-				-				-
Bruce Wallace			-				-				-				-				-

 

(1)	Mr. Becker participated in the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2005. No additional contributions were made during 2015. The amounts in the above table are not required to be and are not reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above.

Other Post-Employment Payments

There are certain circumstances in which our NEOs may be entitled to post-employment payments, which are discussed in further detail below:

Change in Control Plan

Our Change in Control Plan, adopted in 2006, provides a specified severance benefit to our executive officers in the event their employment is involuntarily terminated or they resign from such employment for a “good reason” following a change in control of the Company. (Generally under the plan, “good reason” is defined as the occurrence of any of the following events without the covered employee’s written consent: (i) material, involuntary reduction in responsibilities, authorities or functions, except in connection with a termination of employment for death, disability, retirement, fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement and other exclusions; (ii) a material reduction in base salary; (iii) a reduction in total compensation to less than 85% of the

 

49

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

amount provided for the last full calendar year; or (iv) a relocation of more than fifty (50) miles.) We adopted this plan in order to ensure that its executives remain incented to consider and, where determined by the Board or stockholders, as appropriate, to be in our best interests, to act diligently to promote a change in the control of the Company. The plan does not provide for any 280G excise tax gross-up provisions.

We did not make any amendments or changes to the plan in 2015.

The plan provides for a cash severance payment equal to 300% of base salary and target ICP incentive for the Chief Executive Officer, 200% of base salary and target ICP incentive for the Chief Financial Officer, the Bank’s President and the Chief Strategy Officer, and 100% of base salary and target ICP incentive for the other executive officers. In addition, it provides for up to 12 months of Company-paid COBRA medical, dental and vision coverage, full vesting of Company contributions to tax-qualified retirement plans, and certain outplacement services.

The circumstances that constitute a “Change in Control” are set forth in the Change in Control Plan. Generally speaking, a Change in Control includes a merger or consolidation, other than a merger or consolidation in which the owners of our voting securities own fifty percent (50%) or more of the voting securities of the surviving entity; a liquidation or dissolution or the closing of the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets; an acquisition by any person, directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of our voting securities; and an acquisition by any person, directly or indirectly, of 25% or more of our voting securities and, within twelve (12) months of the occurrence of such event, a change in the composition of the Board occurs as a result of which sixty percent (60%) or fewer of the directors are incumbent directors.

Our Change in Control Plan includes a number of restrictive covenants that govern the executives’ rights to receive benefits under the plan. Specifically, unless we provide otherwise in writing, the executive must not directly or indirectly engage in, have any ownership in or participate in the financing, operation, management or control of any person, firm, corporation or business that competes with us or our affiliates, or any of our customers or our affiliates, for 18 months with respect to the chief executive officer, 12 months for the chief financial officer, the Bank’s president and chief strategy officer, and six months for other covered executives. In addition, unless we provide otherwise in writing, the executive may not directly or indirectly solicit, recruit or otherwise hire or attempt to hire any of our employees or cause any such person to leave his or her employment during the periods described in the previous sentence. Finally, the executive must execute a general release of claims in our favor covering all claims arising out of the executive’s involuntary termination of employment (as defined in the Change in Control Plan) and employment with us and our affiliates.

Any benefits payable to an executive under this Plan are reduced by any severance benefits we pay to that executive under any other policy, plan, program, or arrangement, including our Group Severance Benefit Policy.

SVB Financial Group Severance Benefit Policy

Our Severance Benefit Policy provides severance pay and benefits to eligible employees who are involuntarily terminated from employment due to staff reduction, position elimination, closure of a business unit, organization restructuring, or such other circumstances as we deem appropriate for the payment of severance benefits. The policy is intended to promote our ability to modify its workforce and structure while providing a reasonable level of certainty and job security to our employees. The policy covers all regular full-time or regular part-time employees, including the NEOs.

The policy provides for a cash severance payment based on level of job. For NEOs, this benefit is equal to 6 weeks’ pay per year of service including a pro-rata amount for each partial year worked, with a minimum benefit of 6 months’ pay and a maximum benefit of 1 year’s pay. In addition, under the policy we continue to make co-payments for COBRA medical, dental, and vision coverage during the severance pay period and pays for certain designated outplacement services provided by a Company-selected external vendor. Any benefits payable to an executive under this Policy are reduced by any severance benefits we pay to that executive under any other policy, plan, program, or arrangement, including our Change in Control Plan discussed above.

2006 Equity Incentive Plan

Our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, in which the NEOs participate, provides for full vesting of outstanding awards in the event of a change in control (as defined in the plan) of the Company in the event that a successor corporation does not assume or substitute an equivalent option or right for the original equity awards under the plans. In addition, effective as of January 7, 2015, we amended the equity awards agreements under the plan to provide for certain vesting of outstanding awards upon the termination of a participant’s employment due to death or disability as follows: (i) full vesting of any outstanding stock option awards, restricted stock unit awards subject to time-based vesting, restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights awards; and (ii) pro-rated vesting for any outstanding restricted stock unit awards subject to performance conditions based on the level of achievement of the applicable performance conditions as of the date of termination. These changes apply to all outstanding awards on a retrospective basis, as well as to any new grants made under the applicable amended form of award agreement on a prospective basis.

 

50

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

Payments Upon Termination Of Employment

The following tables summarize the payments which would be payable to our NEOs, as of December 31, 2015, in the event of various termination scenarios, including voluntary resignation, involuntary termination for cause, involuntary termination (not for cause), involuntary termination after a change in control, death and disability.

 

		GREG BECKER, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Compensation and Benefits		Voluntary Resignation (including Retirement)				Involuntary Termination for Cause				Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) (1)				Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in-Control (2)				Death				Disability
Cash severance pay		$	-			$	-			$	910,000			$	5,187,000			$	-			$	-
Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)			2,183,145				-				2,183,145				2,183,145				2,183,145				2,183,145
Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)			-				-				-				1,337,522				1,337,522				1,337,522
Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)			-				-				-				3,798,737  (5)				2,654,205  (6)				2,654,205  (6)
Company-paid health benefits			-				-				13,243				17,652				-				-
Accelerated retirement plan vesting			-				-				-				-				-				-
Company-paid outplacement benefits			-				-				20,000				20,000				-				-
Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable (7)			171,890				171,890				171,890				171,890				171,890				171,890
TOTAL		$	2,355,035			$	171,890			$	3,298,278			$	12,715,946			$	6,346,762			$	6,346,762

 

 

(1)	Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits, and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) are calculated based on the terms of our U.S. Severance Benefit Policy.

(2)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits, and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in-Control are calculated based on the terms of our Change in Control Severance Plan for Executives. Consistent with that plan, amounts reported are calculated assuming no tax adjustment. Under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, if outstanding equity awards are not assumed or substituted by the successor of the Company upon a change of control event, all such awards will fully vest and all restrictions will lapse. The amounts reported in this table assume that such equity awards have not been assumed or substituted.

(3)	The market value of vested, exercisable stock options is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90 per share (the closing share price as of December 31, 2015).

(4)	The market value of unvested equity which would vest is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90 per share (the closing share price as of December 31, 2015).

(5)

The amount reported is comprised of (a) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $1,675,896 and (b) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $2,122,841 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2015 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(6)

The amount reported is comprised of (a) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $1,675,896 and (b) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $978,309 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2015 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(7)	Deferred Compensation Plan balance for Mr. Becker reflects account balance as of December 31, 2015. Mr. Becker is entitled to receive his account balance under each of the termination scenarios, to be paid in accordance with the plan and Mr. Becker’s payment election.

 

51

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

		MICHAEL DESCHENEAUX, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Compensation and Benefits		Voluntary Resignation (including Retirement)				Involuntary Termination for Cause				Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) (1)				Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in- Control (2)				Death				Disability
Cash severance pay		$	-			$	-			$	600,000			$	1,920,000			$	-			$	-
Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)			1,493,059				-				1,493,059				1,493,059				1,493,059				1,493,059
Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)			-				-				-				738,309				738,309				738,309
Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)			-				-				-				1,678,749	(5)			1,209,927	(6)			1,209,927	(6)
Company-paid health benefits			-				-				20,613				26,671				-				-
Accelerated retirement plan vesting			-				-				-				-				-				-
Company-paid outplacement benefits			-				-				7,500				7,500				-				-
Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable			-				-				-				-				-				-
TOTAL		$	1,493,059			$	-			$	2,121,172			$	5,864,288			$	3,441,295			$	3,441,295

 

 

(1)	Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits, and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) are calculated based on the terms of our U.S. Severance Benefit Policy.

(2)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits, and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in-Control are calculated based on the terms of our Change in Control Severance Plan for Executives. Consistent with that plan, amounts reported are calculated assuming no tax adjustment. Under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, if outstanding equity awards are not assumed or substituted by the successor of the Company upon a change of control event, all such awards will fully vest and all restrictions will lapse. The amounts reported in this table assume that such equity awards have not been assumed or substituted.

(3)	The market value of vested, exercisable stock options is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90 per share (the closing share price as of December 31, 2015).

(4)	The market value of unvested equity which would vest is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90 per share (the closing share price as of December 31, 2015).

(5)

The amount reported is comprised of (a) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $796,987 and (b) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $881,762 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2015 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(6)

The amount reported is comprised of (a) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $796,987 and (b) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $412,940 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2015 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

 

		JOHN CHINA, HEAD OF RELATIONSHIP BANKING
Compensation and Benefits		Voluntary Resignation (including Retirement)				Involuntary Termination for Cause				Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) (1)				Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in- Control (2)				Death				Disability
Cash severance pay		$	-			$	-			$	480,000			$	768,000			$	-			$	-
Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)			1,195,257				-				1,195,257				1,195,257				1,195,257				1,195,257
Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)			-				-				-				343,312				343,312				343,312
Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)			-				-				-				926,350	(5)			670,596	(6)			670,596	(6)
Company-paid health benefits			-				-				20,613				26,671				-				-
Accelerated retirement plan vesting			-				-				-				-				-				-
Company-paid outplacement benefits			-				-				7,500				7,500				-				-
Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable			-				-				-				-				-				-
TOTAL		$	1,195,257			$	-			$	1,703,370			$	3,267,090			$	2,209,165			$	2,209,165

 

 

(1)	Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits, and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) are calculated based on the terms of our U.S. Severance Benefit Policy.

(2)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits, and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in-Control are calculated based on the terms of our Change in Control Severance Plan for Executives. Consistent with that plan, amounts reported are calculated assuming no tax adjustment. Under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, if outstanding equity awards are not assumed or substituted by the successor of the Company upon a change of control event, all such awards will fully vest and all restrictions will lapse. The amounts reported in this table assume that such equity awards have not been assumed or substituted.

(3)	The market value of vested, exercisable stock options is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90 per share (the closing share price as of December 31, 2015).

(4)	The market value of unvested equity which would vest is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90 per share (the closing share price as of December 31, 2015).

(5)

The amount reported is comprised of (a) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $445,399 and (b) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $480,951 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2015 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(6)

The amount reported is comprised of (a) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $445,399 and (b) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $225,197 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2015 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

 

52

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

		JOAN PARSONS, HEAD OF SPECIALTY BANKING
Compensation and Benefits		Voluntary Resignation (including Retirement)				Involuntary Termination for Cause				Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) (1)				Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in- Control (2)				Death				Disability
Cash severance pay		$	-			$	-			$	480,000			$	768,000			$	-			$	-
Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)			368,995				-				368,995				368,995				368,995				368,995
Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)			-				-				-				397,873				397,873				397,873
Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)			-				-				-				917,433	(5)			661,679	(6)			661,679	(6)
Company-paid health benefits			-				-				20,613				26,671				-				-
Accelerated retirement plan vesting			-				-				-				-				-				-
Company-paid outplacement benefits			-				-				7,500				7,500				-				-
Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable			-				-				-				-				-				-
TOTAL		$	368,995			$	-			$	877,108			$	2,486,472			$	1,428,547			$	1,428,547

 

 

(1)	Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits, and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) are calculated based on the terms of our U.S. Severance Benefit Policy.

(2)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits, and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in-Control are calculated based on the terms of our Change in Control Severance Plan for Executives. Consistent with that plan, amounts reported are calculated assuming no tax adjustment. Under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, if outstanding equity awards are not assumed or substituted by the successor of the Company upon a change of control event, all such awards will fully vest and all restrictions will lapse. The amounts reported in this table assume that such equity awards have not been assumed or substituted.

(3)	The market value of vested, exercisable stock options is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90 per share (the closing share price as of December 31, 2015).

(4)	The market value of unvested equity which would vest is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90 per share (the closing share price as of December 31, 2015).

(5)

The amount reported is comprised of (a) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $436,482 and (b) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $480,951 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2015 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(6)

The amount reported is comprised of (a) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $436,482 and (b) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $225,197 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2015 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

 

		BRUCE WALLACE, CHIEF DIGITAL OFFICER
Compensation and Benefits		Voluntary Resignation (including Retirement)				Involuntary Termination for Cause				Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) (1)				Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in- Control (2)				Death				Disability
Cash severance pay		$	-			$	-			$	402,866			$	720,000			$	-			$	-
Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)			122,693				-				122,693				122,693				122,693				122,693
Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)			-				-				-				395,146				395,146				395,146
Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)			-				-				-				908,515	(5)			652,761	(6)			652,761	(6)
Company-paid health benefits			-				-				14,129				20,363				-				-
Accelerated retirement plan vesting			-				-				-				-				-				-
Company-paid outplacement benefits			-				-				7,500				7,500				-				-
Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable			-				-				-				-				-				-
TOTAL		$	122,693			$	-			$	547,188			$	2,174,217			$	1,170,600			$	1,170,600

 

 

(1)	Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits, and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) are calculated based on the terms of our U.S. Severance Benefit Policy.

(2)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits, and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in-Control are calculated based on the terms of our Change in Control Severance Plan for Executives. Consistent with that plan, amounts reported are calculated assuming no tax adjustment. Under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, if outstanding equity awards are not assumed or substituted by the successor of the Company upon a change of control event, all such awards will fully vest and all restrictions will lapse. The amounts reported in this table assume that such equity awards have not been assumed or substituted.

(3)	The market value of vested, exercisable stock options is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90 per share (the closing share price as of December 31, 2015).

(4)	The market value of unvested equity which would vest is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90 per share (the closing share price as of December 31, 2015).

(5)

The amount reported is comprised of (a) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $427,564 and (b) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $480,951 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2015 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(6)

The amount reported is comprised of (a) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $427,564 and (b) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $225,197 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2015 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

 

53

    ^{EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION}

---

Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership as of the Record Date of our Common Stock by: (i) each of our directors and director nominees, (ii) each of the executive officers named in the “Summary Compensation Table” above, and (iii) all directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise noted and subject to applicable community property laws, the respective nominees have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown in the table as beneficially owned.

 

		Shares Beneficially Owned
Name of Beneficial Owner		Number of Shares				Percent of Class Owned
Eric Benhamou (1)			15,262				*	%
David Clapper (1)			14,706				*
Roger Dunbar (2)			15,605				*
Joel Friedman (1)			19,706				*
Lata Krishnan (3)			12,056				*
Jeffrey Maggioncalda (1)			4,701				*
Mary Miller (1)			1,737				*
Kate Mitchell (3)			7,949				*
John Robinson (1)			5,471				*
Garen Staglin (1)			11,406				*
Greg Becker (4)			96,461				*
Michael Descheneaux (5)			42,010				*
John China (6)			32,841				*
Joan Parsons (7)			34,656				*
Bruce Wallace (8)			12,400				*
All directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group (23 persons) (9)			401,249				*

 

 

*	Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.