UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One) |
☒ |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 1-32729
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
82-0156045 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
601 West 1st Ave., Suite 1600 |
|
|
Spokane, Washington |
|
99201 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (509) 835-1500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
TITLE OF EACH CLASS |
|
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH |
Common Stock |
|
REGISTERED |
($1 par value) |
|
The Nasdaq Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer |
☒ |
Accelerated filer |
☐ |
Non-accelerated filer |
☐ |
Smaller reporting company |
☐ |
|
|
Emerging growth company |
☐ |
In an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at June 30, 2018, was approximately $3,106.8 million, based on the closing price of $50.85.
As of February 25, 2019, 67,865,766 shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $1 per share, were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders expected to be filed with the Commission on or about March 29, 2019 are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Table of Contents
|
|
PAGE NUMBER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
3 |
|
ITEM 1A. |
10 |
|
ITEM 1B. |
20 |
|
ITEM 2. |
20 |
|
ITEM 3. |
20 |
|
ITEM 4. |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
21 |
|
ITEM 6. |
23 |
|
ITEM 7. |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
24 |
ITEM 7A. |
43 |
|
ITEM 8. |
44 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
47 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
50 |
|
ITEM 9. |
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
85 |
ITEM 9A. |
85 |
|
ITEM 9B. |
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 10. |
88 |
|
ITEM 11. |
89 |
|
ITEM 12. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
89 |
ITEM 13. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
89 |
ITEM 14. |
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
90 |
|
ITEM 16. |
94 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
For purposes of this report, any references to "the company,” “us,” “we” and “our” include PotlatchDeltic Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This report contains, in addition to historical information, certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including without limitation, statements regarding:
|
• |
timber volume; |
|
• |
lumber demand and pricing in North America in 2019; |
|
• |
North American housing starts and repair and remodel activity; |
|
• |
expected improvements in U.S. economic growth due to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; |
|
• |
decreased Asian demand for North American lumber; |
|
• |
excess log supply in the South; |
|
• |
expected sawlog prices in 2019; |
|
• |
expected 2019 timber harvest of approximately 6.0 to 6.1 million tons; |
|
• |
expected sale of 36% of timber volume under log supply agreements in 2019; |
|
• |
expected sales of 55,000 acres of higher and better use (HBU) property, 75,000 acres of non-strategic timberland and 100,000 acres of rural recreational real estate property over the next decade or more; |
|
• |
funding of our dividends in 2019; |
|
• |
compliance with REIT tax rules; |
|
• |
Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC®) and Sustainable Forest Initiative® (SFI®) certification of our timberlands; |
|
• |
expectations regarding premium prices for FSC®-certified logs and FSC®-certified lumber; |
|
• |
realization of deferred tax assets; |
|
• |
expected capital expenditures in 2019; |
|
• |
expectations regarding funding of our pension plans in 2019 and over the next 7 years; |
|
• |
estimated non-qualified pension plan payments in 2019; |
|
• |
estimated future benefit payments; |
|
• |
estimated future payments under operating leases; |
|
• |
estimated long-term rate of return on pension assets and discount rate; |
|
• |
estimated future debt payments; |
|
• |
expectations regarding the effect of new Financial Accounting Standards Board rulings or interpretations; and |
|
• |
expected liquidity in 2019 to fund our operations, regular stockholder dividends, capital expenditures and debt service obligations and related matters. |
Words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “will,” “intend,” “plan,” “target,” “project,” “believe,” “seek,” “schedule,” “estimate,” “could,” “can,” “may” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views regarding future events based on estimates and assumptions and are therefore subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance.
1
Our actual results of operations could differ materially from our historical results or those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements contained in this report. Important factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
• |
changes in timber growth rates; |
|
• |
changes in silviculture; |
|
• |
timber cruising variables; |
|
• |
changes in state forest acts or best management practices; |
|
• |
changes in timber harvest levels on our lands; |
|
• |
changes in timber prices; |
|
• |
changes in timberland values; |
|
• |
changes in policy regarding governmental timber sales; |
|
• |
changes in the United States and international economies; |
|
• |
changes in interest rates and discount rates; |
|
• |
changes in exchange rates; |
|
• |
changes in requirements for FSC® or SFI® certification; |
|
• |
changes in the level of residential and commercial construction and remodeling activity; |
|
• |
changes in tariffs, quotas and trade agreements involving wood products; |
|
• |
changes in demand for our products; |
|
• |
changes in production and production capacity in the forest products industry; |
|
• |
competitive pricing pressures for our products; |
|
• |
unanticipated manufacturing disruptions; |
|
• |
changes in general and industry-specific environmental laws and regulations; |
|
• |
unforeseen environmental liabilities or expenditures; |
|
• |
weather conditions; |
|
• |
changes in raw material and other costs; |
|
• |
collectability of amounts owed by customers; |
|
• |
changes in federal and state tax laws; |
|
• |
the ability to satisfy complex rules in order to remain qualified as a REIT; and |
|
• |
changes in tax laws that could reduce the benefits associated with REIT status. |
For a discussion of some of the factors that may affect our business, results and prospects, see Part 1 - Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Forward-looking statements contained in this report present our views only as of the date of this report. Except as required under applicable law, we do not intend to issue updates concerning any future revisions of our views to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report.
2
General
PotlatchDeltic Corporation, formerly known as Potlatch Corporation and also formerly known as Potlatch Holdings, Inc., was incorporated in Delaware in September 2005 to facilitate a restructuring to qualify for treatment as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for federal income tax purposes. It is the successor to the business of the original Potlatch Corporation, which was incorporated in Maine in 1903. References herein to Potlatch, refer to Potlatch Corporation prior to the Deltic merger described below.
On February 20, 2018 (merger date), Deltic Timber Corporation (Deltic) merged into Portland Merger, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Potlatch. Following the merger Potlatch changed its name to PotlatchDeltic Corporation. Deltic owned approximately 530,000 acres of timberland, operated two sawmills and a medium density fiberboard facility and engaged in real estate development primarily in central Arkansas. The merger uniquely positions us to expand our integrated model of timberland ownership and lumber manufacturing, provide tax savings on Deltic’s timber harvest earnings and increase our exposure to the Texas housing market. Under the merger agreement, each issued and outstanding share of Deltic common stock was exchanged for 1.80 shares of Potlatch common stock, with cash paid in lieu of any fractional shares.
On December 20, 2018 we entered into an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement with Roseburg Forest Products Co. to sell the medium density fiberboard facility (MDF facility) we acquired through the Deltic merger. The sale closed on February 12, 2019. At December 31, 2018 the MDF facility was classified as held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 3: Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about the sale.
We are a leading timberland REIT with operations in seven states where we own approximately 1.9 million acres of timberland. We own six sawmills, an industrial grade plywood mill and real estate development projects primarily in central Arkansas.
We are focused on the ownership of timberland, which we view as a unique and attractive asset due to the renewable nature of timber resources and timber’s long-term history of price appreciation in excess of inflation. Our primary objectives include using our timberland investments to generate income and maximizing the long-term value of our assets. We pursue these objectives by adhering to the following strategies:
|
• |
Managing our timberlands to improve their long-term sustainable yield. We manage our timberlands in a manner designed to optimize the balance among timber growth, prudent environmental management and current cash flow, in order to achieve increasing levels of sustainable yield over the long-term. We may choose to harvest timber at levels above or below our current estimate of sustainability for short periods of time, for the purpose of improving the long-term productivity of certain timber stands or in response to market conditions. In addition, we focus on optimizing timber returns by continually improving productivity and yields through advanced silvicultural practices that take into account soil, climate and biological considerations. |
|
• |
Pursuing attractive acquisitions. We actively pursue timberland acquisitions that meet our financial and strategic criteria. The critical elements of our acquisition strategy generally include acquiring properties that complement our existing land base, are cash flow accretive and have attractive timber or higher and better use (HBU) values. |
|
• |
Maximizing the value of our timberland real estate. A portion of our acreage is more valuable for recreational purposes or to other timberland or real estate investors. We continually assess the potential uses of our lands and manage them proactively for the highest value. We have identified approximately 12% of our timberlands as having values that are potentially greater than timberland values. |
|
• |
Practicing sound environmental stewardship. We pursue a program of environmental stewardship and active involvement in federal, state and local policymaking to maximize our assets’ long-term value. We manage our timberlands in a manner consistent with the principles set forth by SFI® or FSC®. |
3
Our businesses are organized into three operating segments:
|
• |
Resource: Our Resource segment manages our timberlands to optimize revenue producing opportunities while adhering to our strict stewardship standards. Management activities include planting and harvesting trees and building and maintaining roads. The Resource segment also generates revenues from activities such as hunting leases, recreation permits and leases, mineral rights leases, biomass production and carbon sequestration. |
|
• |
Wood Products: Our Wood Products segment manufactures and sells lumber, plywood and residual products. |
|
• |
Real Estate: Our Real Estate segment consists primarily of sales of rural real property deemed non-strategic or identified as having higher and better use alternatives and real estate development and subdivision activity through PotlatchDeltic’s taxable REIT subsidiaries (PotlatchDeltic TRS). |
Additional information regarding each of our operating segments is included in this section, as well as in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 21: Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes on our income from investments in real estate that we distribute to our stockholders, including the income derived from the sale of standing timber. We are required to pay federal corporate income taxes on income from our non-real estate investments, principally the operations of PotlatchDeltic TRS.
Deltic’s REIT qualifying activities were also not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes commencing on the date of the merger. We are, however, subject to corporate taxes on built-in gains (the excess of fair market value over tax basis on the merger date) on sales of former Deltic real property held by the REIT during the five years following the Deltic merger. The sale of standing timber is not subject to built-in gains tax.
Available Information
We make our periodic and current reports that we file with, or furnish to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) available on or through our website, www.PotlatchDeltic.com (under “Investor Resources – Financial Information”), at no charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file the information with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this report.
Business Segments
Resource Segment
Industry Background. The demand for timber depends primarily upon the markets for wood related products, including lumber, panel products, paper and other pulp-based products. The end uses for timber vary widely, depending on species, size and quality. Historically, timber demand has experienced cyclical fluctuations, although sometimes at different times and rates for products or geographic regions. The demand for sawlogs, lumber and other manufactured wood products is significantly dependent upon the level of new residential construction and remodeling activity, which, in turn, is affected by general economic and demographic factors, including population growth, new household formations, interest rates for home mortgages and construction loans and credit availability. Increases in residential construction and remodeling activities are generally followed by higher lumber prices, which are usually followed by higher log prices. The demand for pulpwood is dependent on the paper and pulp-based manufacturing industries. Both pulpwood and sawlogs are affected by domestic and international economic conditions, global population growth and other demographic factors, industry capacity and the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to foreign currencies. Locally, timber demand and pricing also fluctuates due to the expansion or closure of individual wood products and pulp-based manufacturing facilities.
Timber supplies can fluctuate depending upon factors such as changes in weather conditions and harvest strategies, as well as occasionally high timber salvage efforts due to storm damage, unusual pest infestations such as the mountain pine beetle, or fires. Local timber supplies also change in response to prevailing timber prices. Rising timber prices often lead to increased harvesting on private timberlands, including lands not
4
previously made available for commercial timber operations. The supply of timber generally is adequate to meet demand, although this could tighten in the event of higher demand due to increased United States (U.S.) housing starts, increased log and lumber exports and the impacts from a natural disaster, such as fire, hurricane, earthquake, insect infestation, drought, disease, ice storms, windstorms, flooding or other factors.
Timberland Sale. On April 21, 2016, we sold approximately 172,000 acres of timberlands located in central Idaho for $114 million. We purchased the property in 2007 and 2008 for the purpose of growing and harvesting timber and selling rural recreational parcels. The sale freed up capital without having to wait for the rural recreational real estate market in central Idaho to recover. Historical earnings generated by the property were positive, but not material.
Ownership. The Resource segment manages approximately 1.9 million acres of timberlands including approximately 19,000 acres under long-term leases. We are the largest private landowner in Idaho and second largest in Arkansas. The following table provides additional information about our timberlands.
(Acres in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Region |
|
State |
|
Description |
|
Acres |
|
|
Northern region |
|
Idaho |
|
Variety of commercially viable softwood species, such as grand fir, Douglas fir and inland red cedar |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
Minnesota |
|
Primarily pine, aspen and hardwoods |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Northern region |
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern region |
|
Arkansas |
|
Primarily southern yellow pine and hardwoods |
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
Mississippi |
|
Primarily southern yellow pine and hardwoods |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
Alabama |
|
Primarily southern yellow pine and hardwoods |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
Louisiana |
|
Primarily southern yellow pine and hardwoods |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Southern region |
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,881 |
|
Operation. The primary business of the Resource segment is the management of our timberlands to optimize the value of all possible revenue producing opportunities while adhering to our strict stewardship standards. Management activities include planting and harvesting trees and building and maintaining roads. The segment also generates revenue from non-timber resources such as from hunting leases, recreation permits and leases, mineral rights leases, biomass production and carbon sequestration.
We strive to maximize cash flow while managing our timberlands sustainably over the long-term. From time to time, we may choose, within the parameters of our environmental commitments, to harvest timber at levels above or below our estimate of sustainability for short periods in order to take advantage of strong demand or to adjust to weak demand. To maximize our timberlands' long-term value, we manage them intensively, based upon timber species and local growing conditions. Our harvest plans take into account changing market conditions, are designed to contribute to the growth of the remaining timber and reflect our policy of environmental stewardship. We reforest our acreage in a timely fashion to enhance its long-term value. We employ silvicultural techniques to improve timber growth rates, including vegetation control, fertilization and thinning. In deciding whether to implement any silvicultural practice, we analyze the associated costs and long-term benefits, with the goal of achieving an attractive return over time.
Inventory. At the end of 2018, our estimated standing merchantable timber inventory was approximately 88 million tons, including approximately 34 million tons in the North and approximately 54 million tons in the South. At the end of 2017, our estimated standing merchantable timber inventory was approximately 64 million tons. The increase in standing merchantable timber inventory from 2017 was primarily attributable to the addition of the Deltic timberlands.
The aggregate estimated volume of current standing merchantable timber inventory is updated annually to reflect increases due to reclassification of young growth to merchantable timber when the young growth meets defined diameter specifications, the annual growth rates of merchantable timber and the acquisition of additional merchantable timber and to reflect decreases due to timber harvests and land sales. This estimate is derived using methods consistent with industry practice and is based on statistical methods and field sampling. The estimated inventory volume includes timber in environmentally sensitive areas where the timberlands are
5
managed in a manner consistent with best management practices, state forest practice acts and the SFI® or FSC® forest management standards.
Timber volumes are estimated from cruises of the timber tracts, which are generally completed on a five to ten year cycle. Since the individual cruises collect field data at different times for specific sites, the growth model projects standing inventory from the cruise date to a common reporting date. Annual growth rates for the merchantable inventory have historically been in the range of 2% to 5% in the North and 6% to 9% in the South.
Harvest. Our short-term and long-term harvest plans are critical factors in our long-term management process. Each year, we prepare a harvest plan designating the timber tracts and volumes to be harvested during that particular year. Each harvest plan reflects our analysis of the age, size and species distribution of our timber, as well as our expectations about harvest methods, growth rates, the volume of each species to be harvested, anticipated acquisitions and dispositions, thinning operations, regulatory constraints and other relevant information. Among other things, the optimal harvest cycles, or rotations, for timber vary by location and species and tend to change over time as a result of silvicultural advances, changes in the markets for different sizes and ages of timber and other factors. Since harvest plans are based on projections of weather, timber growth rates, regulatory constraints and other assumptions, many of which are beyond our control, there can be no assurance that we will be able to harvest the volumes projected or the specific timber stands designated in our harvest plans.
Detailed harvest information by region and product is presented in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The following table presents a summary of our total 2018 timber harvest by region.
|
|
Timber Harvested |
|
|||||||||||||
(Tons in thousands) |
|
Sawlogs |
|
|
Pulpwood |
|
|
Stumpage |
|
|
Total |
|
||||
Northern region |
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
Southern region |
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
3,669 |
|
Total |
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
5,543 |
|
Based on our current projections, which are based on constant timberland holdings and take into consideration such factors as market conditions, the ages of our timber stands and recent timberland sales and acquisitions, we expect to harvest 6.0 to 6.1 million tons in 2019.
The Resource segment sells a portion of its logs at market prices to our Wood Products manufacturing facilities. Intersegment sales to our Wood Products manufacturing facilities were 33%, 26% and 22% of our total Resource segment revenues for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The segment also sells sawlogs and pulpwood to a variety of forest products companies located near our timberlands. The segment’s customers range in size from small operators to multinational corporations. No customer represented more than 10% of our consolidated revenues in 2018. Idaho Forest Group, LLC operates six sawmills in Idaho and represented slightly more than 10% of our consolidated revenues in 2017 and 2016. The segment competes with owners of timberlands that operate in areas near our timberlands, ranging from private owners of small tracts of land to some of the largest timberland companies in the United States (U.S.). The segment competes principally on the basis of distance to market, price, log quality and customer service.
In 2018, approximately 36% of our harvest volumes were sold under log supply agreements. We expect approximately the same amount to be sold under log supply agreements in 2019. In general, our log supply agreements require a specified volume of timber to be delivered to defined customer facilities at prices that are adjusted periodically to reflect market conditions. Prices in our Northern region contracts are adjusted periodically by species to prevailing market prices for logs, lumber, wood chips and other residuals. Prices in our Southern region contracts are adjusted every three months based on prevailing market prices for logs. Typically, our log supply agreements are in place for one to five years.
Other. Our timberlands include a wide diversity of softwood and hardwood species and are certified to either the SFI® or FSC® standards. We adhere to principles that include commitments to sustainable forestry, responsible practices, forest health and productivity and protection of special sites. We are generally able to realize price premiums for pulpwood from our FSC®-certified lands.
Our operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations, including those relating to the environment, endangered species, our forestry activities and health and safety. Due to the significance of regulation to our business, we integrate wildlife, habitat and watershed management into our resource
6
management practices. We also take an active approach to regulatory developments by participating in standard-setting where possible. We work cooperatively with regulators to create voluntary conservation plans that address environmental concerns while preserving our ability to operate our timberlands efficiently. Despite our active participation in governmental policymaking and regulatory standard-setting, there can be no assurance that endangered species, environmental and other laws will not restrict our operations or impose significant costs, damages, penalties or liabilities on us. In particular, we anticipate that endangered species and environmental laws will generally become increasingly stringent.
The volume and value of timber that can be harvested from our lands may be affected by natural disasters such as fire, insect infestation, disease, ice storms, hurricanes, wind storms, floods and other weather conditions and causes. We assume substantially all risk of loss to the standing timber we own from fire and other hazards, consistent with industry practice in the United States, because insuring for such losses is not practicable.
Wood Products Segment
Our Wood Products segment manufactures and sells lumber, plywood and residual products at seven mills located in Arkansas, Idaho, Michigan and Minnesota. The segment’s products are largely commodity products, which are sold through our sales department to end users, retailers or wholesalers for nationwide distribution primarily for use in home building, repair and remodeling, industrial products and other construction activity.
A description of our wood products manufacturing facilities, all of which are owned by us, together with their respective 2018 capacities are as follows:
|
|
Annual Capacity1,2 |
Sawmills: |
|
|
Waldo, Arkansas3 |
|
285 MMBF |
Ola, Arkansas3 |
|
230 MMBF |
Warren, Arkansas |
|
220 MMBF |
St. Maries, Idaho |
|
185 MMBF |
Gwinn, Michigan |
|
185 MMBF |
Bemidji, Minnesota |
|
140 MMBF |
Plywood Mill: |
|
|
St. Maries, Idaho |
|
150 MMSF |
|
|
|
1 |
Capacity represents the proven annual production capabilities of the facility under normal operating conditions and producing a normal product mix. Normal operating conditions are based on the configuration, efficiency and the number of shifts worked at each individual facility. In general, the definition includes two shifts per day for five days (two 40-hour shifts) per week at each facility, which is consistent with industry-wide recognized measures. Production can exceed capacity due to efficiency gains and overtime. Actual sawmill production for 2018 was 1,019 MMBF. |
2 |
MMBF stands for million board feet; MMSF stands for million square feet, 3/8-inch panel thickness basis. |
We are a top 10 lumber manufacturer in the United States. We believe that competitiveness in this industry is largely based on individual mill efficiency and on the availability of competitively priced raw materials on a facility-by-facility basis, rather than the number of mills operated. This is due to the fact that it is generally not economical to transfer logs between or among facilities, which might permit a greater degree of specialization and operating efficiencies. Instead, each facility must utilize the raw materials that are available to it in a relatively limited geographic area. For these reasons, we believe we are able to compete effectively with companies that have a larger number of mills. We compete based on product quality, customer service and price.
The principal raw material used is logs, which are obtained from our Resource segment or purchased on the open market. We generally do not maintain long-term supply contracts for a significant volume of logs. During 2018, 2017 and 2016, 42%, 39% and 34% of our log purchases, respectively, were provided by our Resource segment.
7
The activities of our Real Estate segment consist primarily of the sale of non-core timberlands and real estate development and subdivision activity through PotlatchDeltic TRS.
The sale of non-core timberlands are in the categories of HBU, rural recreational real estate and non-strategic properties that exhibit higher value than commercial timberlands.
|
• |
HBU properties have characteristics that provide primarily home site or other development potential as a result of superior location or other attractive amenities. These properties tend to have a much higher value than timberlands. |
|
• |
Rural recreational real estate properties also have a higher value than timberlands, but do not have the same developmental potential as HBU properties. For example, these properties may be appropriate for hunting, conservation or secondary rural housing. |
|
• |
Non-strategic properties are typically on the fringe of our ownership areas and are more valuable to another timberland owner. |
We have identified approximately 230,000 acres of non-core timberland real estate. This includes approximately 55,000 acres of HBU property, 100,000 acres of rural recreational real estate property and 75,000 acres of non-strategic timberland. Sales of these lands are expected to occur over a decade or more. We continually assess the highest value and best use of our timberlands through periodic stratification assessments on our timberlands and as new timberlands are acquired.
From time to time, we also take advantage of opportunities to sell timberland where we believe pricing to be particularly attractive, to match a sale with a purchase of more desirable property while deferring taxes in a like-kind exchange (LKE) transaction, or to meet various other financial or strategic objectives. Sales of conservation properties and conservation easements on our properties are also included in this segment. Results for the segment depend on the demand for our non-core timberlands, the types of properties sold, the basis of these properties and the timing of closings of property sales. Although large sales of non-strategic properties can cause results that are not comparable or predictable between periods, we have maintained a relatively consistent level of rural real estate and HBU sales.
The Real Estate segment also engages in real estate development and sales through PotlatchDeltic TRS. Chenal Valley in Little Rock, Arkansas is a premier upscale planned community, with approximately 4,800 acres of residential and commercial properties centered around a country club with two championship golf courses, which we own and operate. In addition, we are developing an approximate 800-acre upscale community for residential, resort, or retirement living at Red Oak Ridge, in Hot Springs, Arkansas.
For these properties, we develop and market residential lots and commercial sites and sell undeveloped acreage. Residential lots are sold to homebuilders and individuals, while commercial sites are sold to developers and businesses. Infrastructure and other improvements to support the development and sale of residential and commercial properties are provided and funded directly by us or in some circumstances, through real property improvement districts. Such properties are developed only when sufficient demand exists and substantially all infrastructure is completed. Future infrastructure investments are primarily for the development and sale of additional property. Most of the infrastructure is in place for Chenal Valley. Our competitors in our real estate markets are other landowners or developers.
Seasonality
Log and pulpwood sales volumes in our Resource segment are typically lower in the first half of each year as winter rains in the Southern region and spring thaw in the Northern region limit timber harvesting operations due to softened roadbeds and wet logging conditions that restrict access to logging sites. The third quarter is typically our Resource segment's strongest production quarter. Real Estate dispositions and acquisitions can be adversely affected when access to any properties to be sold or considered for acquisition are limited due to adverse weather conditions. Demand for our manufactured wood products typically decreases in the winter months when construction activity is slower, while demand typically increases during the spring, summer and fall when
8
construction activity is generally higher. Historically, most Chenal Valley sales take place in the second half of the year.
Geographic Areas
All of our timberlands, wood products manufacturing facilities and other real estate assets are located within the continental United States In 2018, 2017 and 2016, less than 1% of our Wood Products' segment revenues were derived from sales of manufactured wood products outside of the United States, primarily to Canada and Mexico. The remainder of our revenues were from domestic sales.
Environmental Regulation
Our operations are subject to federal and state laws and regulations, including those relating to our emissions, wastewater discharges, solid and hazardous waste management, site remediation, endangered species and our forestry activities. We are also subject to the requirements of the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act and comparable state statutes relating to the health and safety of our employees. We maintain environmental and safety compliance programs and conduct regular internal and independent third-party audits of our facilities and timberlands to monitor compliance with these laws and regulations. Compliance with environmental regulations is a significant factor in our business and requires capital expenditures as well as additional operating costs.
Due to the significance of regulation to our business, we integrate wildlife, habitat and watershed management into our resource management practices. We also take an active approach to regulatory developments by participating in standard-setting where possible. We work cooperatively with regulators to create voluntary conservation plans that address environmental concerns while preserving our ability to operate our timberlands efficiently.
Enactment of new environmental laws or regulations, or changes in existing laws or regulations, particularly relating to air and water quality, or their enforcement, may require significant expenditures by us or may adversely affect our timberland management, harvesting activities and manufacturing operations.
Similarly, a number of species indigenous to our timberlands have been listed as threatened or endangered or have been proposed for one or the other status under the Endangered Species Act. As a result, our activities in or adjacent to the habitat of these species may be subject to restrictions on the harvesting of timber, reforestation activities and the construction and use of roads.
We expect legislative and regulatory developments in the area of climate change to address carbon dioxide emissions and renewable energy and fuel standards. It is unclear as of this date how any such developments will affect our business.
We believe that our manufacturing facilities and timberland operations are currently in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. We cannot be certain, however, that situations that give rise to material environmental liabilities will not be discovered.
At this time, we believe that federal and state laws and regulations related to the protection of endangered species and air and water quality will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity. We anticipate, however, increasingly strict laws and regulations relating to the environment, natural resources and forestry operations, as well as increased social concern over environmental issues, may result in additional restrictions on us, leading to increased costs, additional capital expenditures and reduced operating flexibility.
Information regarding environmental proceedings is included in Note 20: Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report and incorporated herein by reference.
9
As of December 31, 2018, we had 1,471 employees; 53 of which are part time. The workforce consisted of 441 salaried and 1,030 hourly employees. As of December 31, 2018, 12% of the workforce was covered under a collective bargaining agreement, which expires in 2020.
Investing in our common stock involves a significant degree of risk. Our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity could be materially adversely affected by any of the following risks and, as a result, the trading price of our common stock could decline. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. The risks described below should carefully be considered together with the other information contained in this report.
Our cash dividends are not guaranteed and may fluctuate, which could adversely affect our stock price.
Under the REIT rules, to remain qualified as a REIT, a REIT must distribute, within a certain period after the end of each year, 90% of its ordinary taxable income for such year. Our REIT income, however, consists primarily of net capital gains resulting from payments received under timber cutting contracts with PotlatchDeltic TRS and third parties, rather than ordinary taxable income. Therefore, unlike most REITs, we are not required to distribute material amounts of cash to remain qualified as a REIT. If, after giving effect to our dividends, we have not distributed an amount equal to 100% of our REIT taxable income, then we would be required to pay tax on the undistributed portion of such taxable income at regular corporate tax rates and our stockholders would be required to include their proportionate share of any undistributed capital gain in income and would receive a credit or refund for their share of the tax paid by us.
Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, determines the actual amount of dividends to be made to stockholders based on consideration of a number of factors, including, but not limited to, our results of operations, cash flow and capital requirements, economic conditions in our industry and in the markets for our products, tax considerations, borrowing capacity, debt covenant restrictions, timber prices, harvest levels on our timberlands, market demand for timberlands, including timberland properties we have identified as potentially having a higher and better use and future acquisitions and dispositions. For a description of debt covenants that could limit our ability to pay dividends to stockholders in the future, see Liquidity and Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Consequently, the level of future dividends to our stockholders may fluctuate and any reduction in the dividend rate may adversely affect our stock price.
The cyclical nature of our business could adversely affect our results of operations.
The financial performance of our operations is affected by the cyclical nature of our business. The markets for timber, manufactured wood products and real estate are influenced by a variety of factors beyond our control. The demand for our timber and manufactured wood products is affected by the level of new residential construction, home repair and remodeling and commercial and industrial building activity, which are subject to fluctuations due to changes in economic conditions, interest rates, credit availability, population growth, weather conditions and other factors. The demand for logs is also affected by the demand for wood chips in the pulp and paper markets. The supply of timber and logs has historically increased during favorable pricing environments, which then causes downward pressure on prices. Historical prices for our manufactured wood products have been volatile and we have limited direct influence over the timing and extent of price changes for our manufactured wood products. The demand for real estate can be affected by changes in factors such as interest rates, credit availability and economic conditions, as well as by the impact of federal, state and local land use and environmental protection laws.
Our timberlands are located in Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Louisiana, Minnesota and Mississippi. As a result, we may be susceptible to adverse economic and other developments in these regions, including industry slowdowns,
10
business layoffs or downsizing, relocations of businesses, changes in demographics, increases in real estate and other taxes and increased regulation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our operating results and cash flows will be materially affected by supply and demand for timber.
A variety of factors affect prices for timber, including factors affecting demand, such as changes in economic conditions, the level of domestic new construction and remodeling activity, foreign demand, interest rates, credit availability, population growth, weather conditions and pest infestation, as well as changes in timber supply and other factors. All of these factors can vary by region, timber type (sawlogs or pulpwood logs) and species.
Timber prices are affected by changes in demand on a local, national or international level. The closure of a mill in the regions where we own timber can have a material adverse effect on demand and therefore pricing. As the demand for paper nationwide continues to decline, closures of pulp mills have adversely affected the demand for pulpwood and wood chips in certain of the regions in which we operate. Also, demand in other parts of the world may affect timber prices in the markets in which we compete. For example, although we do not sell into the Asian markets, Asian demand has affected supply in North American markets. A recent decrease in Asian demand has had a negative impact on lumber and timber prices in the North American markets.
Timber prices are also affected by changes in timber availability at the local, national and international level. Our timberland ownership is currently concentrated in Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Louisiana, Minnesota and Mississippi. In Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Minnesota and Mississippi, most timberlands are privately owned. Historically, increases in timber prices have often resulted in substantial increases in harvesting on private timberlands, including lands not previously made available for commercial timber operations, causing a short-term increase in supply that has tended to moderate price increases. Decreases in timber prices have often resulted in lower harvest levels, causing short-term decreases in supply that have tended to moderate price decreases. In the South, timber growth rates have exceeded harvests during the past decade, which have led to an oversupply of timber in the region, which in turn has reduced prices. In Idaho, where a greater proportion of timberland is government-owned, any substantial increase in timber harvesting from government-owned land could significantly reduce timber prices, which would harm our results of operations. For more than 20 years, environmental concerns and other factors have limited timber sales by federal agencies, which historically had been major suppliers of timber to the U.S. forest products industry, particularly in the West. Any reversal of policy that substantially increases timber sales from government-owned land could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.
On a local level, timber supplies can fluctuate depending upon factors such as changes in weather conditions and harvest strategies of local timberland owners, as well as occasionally high timber salvage efforts due to events such as unusual pest infestations or fires.
Our wood products are commodities that are widely available from other producers.
Because commodity products have few distinguishing properties from producer to producer, competition for these products is based primarily on price, which is determined by supply relative to demand and competition from substitute products. Prices for our products are affected by many factors outside of our control and we have no influence over the timing and extent of price changes, which often are volatile. Our profitability with respect to these products depends, in part, on managing our costs, particularly raw material and energy costs, which represent significant components of our operating costs and can fluctuate based upon factors beyond our control.
The wood products industry is highly competitive.
The markets for our wood products are highly competitive and companies that have substantially greater financial resources than we do compete with us in each of our lines of business. Our wood products are subject to competition from wood products manufacturers in the United States (U.S.) and Canada. For decades the U.S. and Canada have been in a dispute over pricing for softwood lumber entering the U.S., which has resulted in trade cases and negotiated agreements between the two countries. The U.S. and Canada signed a Softwood Lumber Agreement in 2006, which expired in October 2015. On November 25, 2016, the U.S. lumber industry filed a petition seeking injury determination with the U.S. International Trade Commission, and a petition seeking countervailing (CVD) and anti-dumping (AD) duties on Canadian lumber imports with the U.S. Department of Commerce. Final rulings on injury and CVD and AD duties went into effect on December 28, 2017. The combined
11
CVD and AD cash deposit rate to be paid by most Canadian exporters was established at 20.23%. The Government of Canada has commenced proceedings to appeal the determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission supporting the AD/CVD duties as well as to challenge these duties in the World Trade Organization.
The governments of the U.S. and Canada continue to state publicly their intention to reach a negotiated settlement of these trade cases at some point in the future. Even if an agreement is successfully negotiated, there can be no assurance that it will at all times, or at any time, effectively create a fair-trade environment.
In addition, our wood products manufacturing facilities are relatively capital intensive, which leads to high fixed costs and generally results in continued production as long as prices are sufficient to cover variable costs. These conditions have contributed to substantial price competition, particularly during periods of reduced demand. Some of our wood products competitors may currently be lower-cost producers than we are, or may benefit from weak currencies relative to the U.S. dollar and accordingly these competitors may be less adversely affected than we are by price decreases. Wood products also are subject to significant competition from a variety of substitute products, including non-wood and engineered wood products. To the extent there is a significant increase in competitive pressure from substitute products or other domestic or foreign suppliers, our business could be adversely affected.
We may be unable to harvest timber, or we may elect to reduce harvest levels due to market, weather and regulatory conditions, either of which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.
Our timber harvest levels and sales may be limited due to weather conditions, timber growth cycles, restrictions on access, availability of contract loggers and regulatory requirements associated with the protection of wildlife and water resources, as well as by other factors, including damage by fire, pest infestation, disease and natural disasters such as ice storms, wind storms, tornadoes, hurricanes and floods. Changes in global climate conditions could intensify one or more of these factors. Although damage from such natural causes usually is localized, affecting only a limited percentage of our timber, there can be no assurance that any damage affecting our timberlands will be limited. We typically experience seasonally lower harvest activity during the winter and early spring due to weather conditions. Severe weather conditions and other natural disasters can also reduce the productivity of timberlands and disrupt the harvesting and delivery of logs. Our financial results and cash flows are dependent to a significant extent on our continued ability to harvest timber at adequate levels.
On a short-term basis, we may adjust our timber harvest levels in response to market conditions. Longer term, our timber harvest levels will be affected by acquisitions of additional timberlands, sales of existing timberlands and shifts in harvest from one region to another. In addition to timberland acquisitions and sales, future timber harvest levels may be affected by changes in estimates of long-term sustainable yield because of silvicultural advances, natural disasters, fires, pests, insects and other hazards, regulatory constraints and other factors beyond our control.
We do not insure against losses of standing timber from fire or any other causes.
The volume and value of timber that can be harvested from our lands may be affected by natural disasters such as fire, pest infestation, disease, ice storms, wind storms, tornadoes, hurricanes, floods and other weather conditions and causes beyond our control. As is typical in the forest industry, we assume substantially all risk of loss to the standing timber we own from fire and other hazards because insuring for such losses is not practicable. Consequently, a reduction in our timber inventory could adversely affect our financial results and cash flows.
In addition, the geographic concentration of our property makes us more susceptible to adverse impacts from a single natural disaster such as fire, hurricane, earthquake, insect infestation, drought, disease, ice storms, windstorms, tornadoes, flooding and other factors that could negatively impact our timber production.
12
A material disruption at one of our manufacturing facilities could prevent us from meeting customer demand, reduce our sales or negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Any of our manufacturing facilities, or any of our machines within an otherwise operational facility, could cease operations unexpectedly due to a number of events, including unscheduled maintenance outages, prolonged power failures, equipment failures, raw material shortages, cyber-attacks, labor difficulties, disruptions in the transportation infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, railroad tracks and tunnels, fire, ice storms, floods, windstorms, tornadoes, hurricanes or other catastrophes, terrorism or threats of terrorism, governmental regulations and other operational problems.
Any such downtime or facility damage could prevent us from meeting customer demand for our products and/or require us to make unplanned capital expenditures. If one of these machines or facilities were to incur significant downtime, our ability to meet our production targets and satisfy customer requirements could be impaired, resulting in lower sales and income.
Our businesses are affected by third-party logger and transportation availability and costs.
Our business depends on the availability of third-party logging contractors and providers of transportation of wood products and is materially affected by the cost and availability of these service providers. Therefore, increases in the cost of fuel could negatively impact our financial results by increasing the cost associated with logging activities and transportation services and could also result in an overall reduction in the availability of these services. Truck driver shortages could negatively impact our financial results by reducing the volume of delivered wood products.
Our third-party transportation providers are also subject to several events outside of their control, such as disruption of transportation infrastructure, labor issues and natural disasters. Any failure of a third-party transportation provider to timely deliver our products, including delivery of our wood products to our customers and delivery of wood fiber to our mills, could harm our supply chain, negatively affect our customer relationships and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and our reputation.
Changes in demand for our real estate and delays in the timing of real estate transactions may affect our revenues and operating results.
A number of factors, including availability of credit, a slowing of residential real estate development, population shifts and changes in demographics could reduce the demand for our real estate and negatively affect our results of operations. Changes in investor interest in purchasing timberlands could reduce our ability to execute sales of non-core timberlands and could also negatively affect our results of operations. In addition, changes in the interpretation or enforcement of current laws, or the enactment of new laws, regarding the use and development of real estate, or changes in the political composition of federal, state and local governmental bodies could lead to new or greater costs, delays and liabilities that could materially adversely affect our real estate business, profitability or financial condition.
Additionally, we have real estate development projects located in central Arkansas, specifically, in and west of Little Rock, Arkansas and in Hot Springs, Arkansas. These real estate operations are particularly vulnerable to economic downturns, weather or other adverse events that may occur in this region and to competition from nearby residential housing developments. Our results of operations may be affected by the cyclicality of the homebuilding and real estate industries. Factors influencing these industries include changes in population growth, general and local economic conditions, weather, employment levels, consumer confidence and income, housing demand, new and existing housing inventory levels, availability and cost of financing, mortgage interest rates and foreclosures, and changes in government regulation regarding the environment, zoning, real estate taxes, and other local government fees. In addition, the tightening of credit and economic recession could delay or deter commercial and residential real estate activity and may affect our operating results.
We may be unsuccessful in carrying out our acquisition strategy.
We have pursued, and may continue to pursue, acquisitions of strategic timberland properties and other forest products assets. The markets for timberland and forest products assets are highly competitive. We intend to finance acquisitions through cash from operations, borrowings under our credit facility, proceeds from equity or debt offerings, proceeds from asset dispositions or any combination thereof. In addition, it is uncertain whether
13
any acquisitions we make will perform in accordance with our expectations. The failure to identify and complete acquisitions of suitable properties could adversely affect our operating results and cash flows.
Our businesses are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations.
Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding protection of the environment, including those relating to the protection of timberlands, endangered species, timber harvesting practices, recreation and aesthetics, protection and restoration of natural resources, air and water quality and remedial standards for contaminated soil, sediments and groundwater. Failure to comply with these requirements can result in significant fines or penalties, as well as liabilities for remediation of contaminated sites, natural resource damages or alleged personal injury or property damage claims.
Laws, regulations and related judicial decisions and administrative interpretations affecting our business are subject to change and new laws and regulations that may affect our business are frequently enacted. These changes may adversely affect our ability to harvest and sell timber and operate our manufacturing facilities and may adversely affect the ability of others to develop property we intend to sell for higher and better use purposes. Over time, the complexity and stringency of these laws and regulations have increased markedly and the enforcement of these laws and regulations has intensified. We believe that these laws and regulations will continue to become more restrictive and over time could adversely affect our operating results. Regulatory restrictions on future harvesting activities may be significant. Federal, state and local laws and regulations, which are intended to protect threatened and endangered species, as well as waterways and wetlands, limit and may prevent timber harvesting, road building and other activities on our timberlands. For example, the Clean Water Act and comparable state laws, regulations and best management practices programs protect water quality. As a result, our resource management activities adjacent to rivers and streams, as well as the point source discharges from our manufacturing facilities, are subject to strict regulation and there can be no assurance that our forest management and manufacturing activities will not be subject to increased regulation under the Clean Water Act in the future.
Similarly, the threatened and endangered species restrictions apply to activities that would adversely impact a protected species or significantly degrade its habitat. A number of species on our timberlands have been, and in the future may be, protected under these laws. If current or future regulations or their enforcement become more restrictive, the amount of our timberlands subject to harvest restrictions could increase.
We anticipate that increasingly strict laws and regulations relating to the environment, natural resources and forestry operations, as well as increased social concern over environmental issues, may result in additional restrictions on us, leading to increased costs, additional capital expenditures and reduced operating flexibility.
Our manufacturing operations are subject to stringent environmental laws, regulations and permits covering air emissions, wastewater discharge, water usage and waste handling and disposal that govern how we operate our facilities. These laws, regulations and permits, now and in the future, may restrict our current production and limit our ability to increase production and impose significant costs on our operations with respect to environmental compliance. Overall, it is expected that environmental compliance costs will likely increase over time as environmental requirements become more stringent and as the expectations of the communities in which we operate become more demanding.
Certain environmental laws, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) impose strict, and under certain circumstances joint and several liability on responsible parties, including current and former owners and operators of contaminated sites, for costs of investigation and remediation of contamination. They also impose liability for related damages to natural resources. We have in the past been identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a potentially responsible party under CERCLA at various locations. Additional information is discussed in Note 20: Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report and that information is incorporated herein by reference. It is possible that other facilities we own or operate, or formerly owned or operated, or timberlands we now own or acquire, could also become subject to liabilities under these laws. The cost of investigation and remediation of contaminated properties could increase operating costs and adversely affect our financial results.
Environmental groups and interested individuals may intervene in the regulatory processes in the locations where we own timberlands and operate our wood products mills. Delays or restrictions on our operations due to the intervention of environmental groups or interested individuals could adversely affect our operating results. In
14
addition to intervention in regulatory proceedings, interested parties may file or threaten to file lawsuits that seek to prevent us from obtaining permits, harvesting timber under contract with federal or state agencies, implementing capital improvements or pursuing operating plans or require us to obtain permits before pursuing operating plans. Any lawsuit, or even a threatened lawsuit, could delay harvesting on our timberlands or impact our ability to operate or invest in our wood products mills.
Our defined benefit pension plans are currently underfunded.
We have qualified defined benefit pension plans covering the majority of our employees which, in aggregate at December 31, 2018, were 88.9% funded. The determination of pension plan expense and the requirements for funding our pension plans are based on a number of actuarial assumptions. Two critical assumptions are the expected rate of return on plan assets and the discount rate applied to pension plan obligations. Pension plan assets primarily consist of equity and fixed income investments, therefore fluctuations in actual equity market returns and changes in long-term interest rates may result in increased pension costs in future periods. Changes in assumptions regarding discount rates and expected rates of return on plan assets could also increase future pension costs. Changes in any of these factors may significantly impact future contribution requirements. For additional information regarding this matter see Note 15: Savings Plans, Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Employee Benefits in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Liquidity and Capital Resources and Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We depend on external sources of capital for future growth.
Our ability to finance growth is dependent to a significant degree on external sources of capital. Our ability to access such capital on favorable terms could be hampered by a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control, including a decline in general market conditions, decreased market liquidity, a downgrade to our public debt rating, increases in interest rates, an unfavorable market perception of our growth potential, a decrease in our current or estimated future earnings or a decrease in the market price of our common stock. In addition, our ability to access additional capital may also be limited by the terms of our existing indebtedness, which, among other things, restricts our incurrence of debt and the payment of dividends. For additional details, see Liquidity and Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Any of these factors, individually or in combination, could prevent us from being able to obtain the capital we require on terms that are acceptable to us and the failure to obtain necessary capital could materially adversely affect our future growth.
A strike or other work stoppage, or our inability to renew collective bargaining agreements on favorable terms, could adversely affect our financial results.
As of December 31, 2018, approximately 12% of our workforce was covered by a collective bargaining agreement, which expires in 2020. If our unionized workers were to engage in a strike or other work stoppage, or other non-unionized operations were to become unionized, we could experience a significant disruption of operations at our facilities or higher ongoing labor costs. A strike or other work stoppage in the facilities of any of our major customers or suppliers could also have similar effects on us.
Cybersecurity threats continue to increase in frequency and sophistication; a successful cybersecurity attack could interrupt or disrupt our information technology systems or cause the loss of confidential or protected data which could disrupt our business, force us to incur excessive costs or cause reputational harm.
We use information systems to carry out our operational activities and maintain our business records. Some systems are internally managed and some are maintained by third-party service providers. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store small amounts of sensitive data, including personally identifiable information. Our ability to conduct business could be materially and adversely affected if these systems or resources are compromised, damaged or fail. This could be a result of a cyber incident, malicious code (such as malware, viruses and ransomware), advanced persistent threats, phishing attacks, natural disaster, hardware or software corruption, failure or error, service provider error or failure, intentional or unintentional personnel actions or other disruption.
15
While we have invested in the protection of data and information technology, including through employee training and awareness programs, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent or quickly identify service interruptions or security breaches. Any such interruption or breach of our systems could adversely affect our business operations and/or result in the loss of confidential or protected data and could result in financial, legal, business and reputational harm to us. We maintain cyber liability insurance; however, this insurance may not be sufficient to cover the financial, legal, business or reputational losses that may result from an interruption or breach of our systems.
We are, from time to time, involved in various legal matters, disputes and proceedings that, if determined or concluded in a manner adverse to our interests, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
We are, from time to time, involved in legal matters, disputes and proceedings (legal matters). In some cases, all or a portion of any loss we experience in connection with any such legal matters will be covered by insurance; in other cases, any such losses will not be covered.
Although the disclosures in Note 20: Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contain management’s current views of the effect such legal matters could have on our financial results, there can be no assurance that the outcome of any such legal matters will be as currently expected. It is possible that there could be adverse judgments against us in some, and that we could be required to take a charge and make cash payments for all or a portion of any related awards of damages that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations or cash flows for the quarter or year in which we record or pay it.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
Our indebtedness could materially adversely affect our ability to generate sufficient cash to pay dividends to stockholders and fulfill our debt obligations, our ability to react to changes in our business and our ability to incur additional indebtedness to fund future needs.
Our debt requires interest and principal payments. At December 31, 2018, we had total long-term debt (including debt in liabilities held for sale) of $791.2 million. Subject to the limits contained in our debt instruments, we may be able to incur additional debt from time to time to finance working capital, capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions or for other purposes. If we do so, the risks related to our indebtedness could intensify.
Our indebtedness increases the possibility that we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of, interest on or other amounts due in respect of our indebtedness or to pay dividends to our stockholders. Our indebtedness, combined with our other financial obligations and contractual commitments, could have important consequences for stockholders. For example, it could:
|
• |
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness and any failure to comply with the obligations under any of our debt instruments, including restrictive covenants, could result in an event of default under the agreements governing such indebtedness; |
|
• |
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing funds available for dividends to stockholders, working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other purposes; |
|
• |
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared with our competitors that have relatively less indebtedness; |
|
• |
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industries in which we operate; and |
|
• |
limit our ability to borrow additional funds, or to dispose of assets to raise funds, if needed, for dividends to stockholders, working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other corporate purposes. |
In addition, our variable rate indebtedness and associated interest rate swaps use the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) as a benchmark for establishing the rate. LIBOR is the subject of recent national, international and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. These reforms and other pressures may cause LIBOR to disappear entirely or to perform differently than in the past. The consequences of these developments cannot be
16
entirely predicted but could include an increase in the cost of our variable rate indebtedness. If LIBOR ceases to exist, we may need to renegotiate certain credit agreements extending beyond 2021 that utilize LIBOR as a factor in determining the interest rate to replace LIBOR with the new standard that is established. There is currently no definitive information regarding the future utilization of LIBOR or of any particular replacement rate. As such, the potential effect of any such event on our cost of capital and net income cannot be determined.
Changes in credit ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations could adversely affect our cost of financing and have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities.
Credit rating agencies rate our debt securities on factors that include our operating results, actions that we take, their view of the general outlook for our industry and their view of the general outlook for the economy. Actions taken by the rating agencies can include maintaining, upgrading or downgrading the current rating or placing us on a watch list for possible future downgrading. Downgrading the credit rating of our debt securities or placing us on a watch list for possible future downgrading could limit our access to the credit markets, increase our cost of financing and have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities. For additional detail on our credit ratings see Liquidity and Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
If we fail to remain qualified as a REIT, income from our timberlands will be subject to taxation at regular corporate rates and we will have reduced cash available for dividends to our stockholders.
Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code to our operations, including satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, dividend, stockholder ownership and other requirements, on an ongoing basis. Given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, no assurance can be given that we will remain qualified as a REIT.
In addition, the rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). Changes to the tax laws affecting REITs or taxable REIT subsidiaries, which may have retroactive application, could adversely affect our stockholders or us. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect our stockholders or us. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurance that new legislation, Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not significantly affect our ability to remain qualified as a REIT, the federal income tax consequences of such qualification, the determination of the amount of REIT taxable income or the amount of tax paid by the TRS.
If in any taxable year we fail to remain qualified as a REIT, unless we are entitled to relief under the Internal Revenue Code:
|
• |
we would not be allowed a deduction for dividends to stockholders in computing our taxable income; and |
|
• |
we would be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. |
Any such corporate tax liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for dividends to our stockholders, which in turn could have an adverse impact on the value of our common stock. In addition, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the qualification was lost, unless we are entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions. As a result, net income and the cash available for dividends to our stockholders could be reduced for at least five years, which would have an adverse impact on our financial condition and the value of our common stock.
Certain of our business activities are potentially subject to a prohibited transactions tax on 100% of our net income derived from such activities, which would reduce our cash flow and impair our ability to pay dividends.
REITs are generally intended to be passive entities and can thus only engage in those activities permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, which for us generally include owning and managing a timberland portfolio, growing timber and selling standing timber.
17
Accordingly, the manufacture and sale of wood products, certain types of timberland sales, sale of real estate and the harvest and sale of logs are conducted through PotlatchDeltic TRS because such activities generate non-qualifying REIT income and could constitute “prohibited transactions” if such activities were engaged in directly by the REIT. In general, prohibited transactions are defined by the Internal Revenue Code to be sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business.
By conducting our business in this manner, we believe we will satisfy the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and thus avoid the 100% tax that could be imposed if a REIT were to conduct a prohibited transaction. We may not always be successful, however, in limiting such activities to PotlatchDeltic TRS. Therefore, we could be subject to the 100% prohibited transactions tax if such instances were to occur, which would adversely affect our cash flow and impair our ability to pay quarterly dividends.
Our REIT structure may limit our ability to invest in our non-REIT qualifying operations.
Our use of PotlatchDeltic TRS enables us to continue to engage in non-REIT qualifying business activities consisting primarily of our wood products manufacturing, harvesting of timber, sale of logs, and sale of real estate and selected land parcels that we expect to be sold or developed for higher and better use purposes. However, under the Internal Revenue Code, no more than 20% of the value of the gross assets of a REIT may be represented by securities of our taxable REIT subsidiaries. This may limit our ability to make investments in our wood products manufacturing operations or in other non-REIT qualifying operations.
Our ability to pay dividends and service our indebtedness using cash generated through our taxable REIT subsidiary may be limited.
The rules with which we must comply to maintain our status as a REIT limit our ability to use dividends from PotlatchDeltic TRS for the payment of stockholder dividends and to service our indebtedness. In particular, at least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year as a REIT must be derived from sales of our standing timber and other types of real estate income. No more than 25% of our gross income may consist of dividends from PotlatchDeltic TRS and other non-qualifying types of income. This requirement may limit our ability to receive dividends from PotlatchDeltic TRS and may impact our ability to pay dividends to stockholders and service the REIT's indebtedness using cash from PotlatchDeltic TRS.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
The price of our common stock may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock may be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including those described above under Business and Operating Risks and the following: actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results or our competitors’ operating results, announcements by us or our competitors of capacity changes, acquisitions or strategic investments, our growth rate and our competitors’ growth rates, the financial markets, interest rates and general economic conditions, changes in stock market analyst recommendations regarding us, our competitors or the forest products industry generally, or lack of analyst coverage of our common stock, failure to pay cash dividends or the amount of cash dividends paid, sales of our common stock by our executive officers, directors and significant stockholders or sales of substantial amounts of common stock, changes in accounting principles and changes in tax laws and regulations.
Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and of Delaware law may make it difficult for stockholders to change the composition of our board of directors and may discourage hostile takeover attempts that some of our stockholders may consider to be beneficial.
Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and of Delaware law may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control if our board of directors determines that such changes in control are not in our best interest and that of our stockholders. The provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws include, among other things, the following:
|
• |
a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms; |
|
• |
the ability of our board of directors to issue shares of preferred stock and to determine the price and other terms, including preferences and voting rights, of those shares without stockholder approval; |
18
|
• |
advance notice procedures for nominating candidates to our board of directors or presenting matters at stockholder meetings; |
|
• |
removal of directors only for cause; |
|
• |
allowing only our board of directors to fill vacancies on our board of directors; |
|
• |
in order to facilitate the preservation of our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, a prohibition on any single stockholder, or any group of affiliated stockholders, from beneficially owning more than 9.8% of our outstanding common or preferred stock, unless our board waives or modifies this ownership limitation; |
|
• |
unless approved by the vote of at least 80% of our outstanding shares, we may not engage in business combinations, including mergers, dispositions of assets, certain issuances of shares of stock and other specified transactions, with a person owning or controlling, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the voting power of our outstanding common stock; and |
|
• |
supermajority voting requirements to amend our bylaws and certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation. |
While these provisions have the effect of encouraging persons seeking to acquire control of our company to negotiate with our board of directors, they could enable the board of directors to hinder or frustrate a transaction that stockholders might believe to be in their best interests and, in that case, may prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors. We are also subject to Delaware laws that could have similar effects. One of these laws prohibits us from engaging in a business combination with a significant stockholder unless specific conditions are met.
19
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Information on our locations and facilities is included in Part I - Item 1. Business under each of the respective segment headers.
We believe there is no pending or threatened litigation that could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
20
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq Global Select Market (NASDAQ) with the ticker symbol “PCH”. There were approximately 1,354 stockholders of record at February 25, 2019.
The quarterly cash dividend payments per share for 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Quarter |
|
Cash Dividends |
|
|
|
Cash Dividends |
|
||
1st |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.375 |
|
2nd |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.375 |
|
3rd |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.375 |
|
4th |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
The above table does not include the Deltic earnings and profits special distribution of $222.0 million, or approximately $3.54 per share, paid on November 15, 2018. See Note 4: Earnings Per Share in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, determines the actual amount of dividends to be paid to stockholders based on consideration of a number of factors, including, but not limited to, our results of operations, cash flow and capital requirements, economic conditions in our industry and in the markets for our products, timber prices, harvest levels on our timberlands, market demand for timberlands, including timberland properties we have identified as potentially having a higher and better use, future acquisitions and dispositions, tax considerations, borrowing capacity and debt covenant restrictions. Consequently, the level of dividends paid to our stockholders may fluctuate and any reduction in the dividend rate may adversely affect our stock price.
Reference is made to the discussion in Liquidity and Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of (i) the covenants in our credit facility and term loan with which we must comply in order to make cash dividends and (ii) the REIT tax rules, which under certain circumstances may restrict our ability to receive dividends from PotlatchDeltic TRS, our taxable REIT subsidiary.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On April 26, 2016, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized management to repurchase up to $60.0 million of common stock over a period of 24 months (the Repurchase Plan) expiring on April 30, 2018. In total, $6.0 million of common stock was repurchased in 2016 under the Repurchase Plan prior to its expiration with no shares repurchased during 2017 and 2018.
On August 30, 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized management to repurchase up to $100.0 million of common stock with no time limit set for the repurchase. No shares were repurchased in 2018.
We record share purchases upon trade date, as opposed to the settlement date when cash is disbursed. We record a liability to account for repurchases that have not been settled. There were no unsettled repurchases as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
21
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Information required by this item with respect to equity compensation plans is included under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 29, 2019 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Company Stock Price Performance
The following graph and table show a five-year comparison of cumulative total stockholder returns for our company, the NAREIT Equity Index, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index and a group of four companies that we refer to as our peer group index for the period ended December 31, 2018. The total stockholder return assumes $100 invested at December 31, 2013, with quarterly reinvestment of all dividends.
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|||||
PotlatchDeltic Corporation |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
NAREIT Equity Index |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
S&P 500 Composite Index |
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
2018 Peer Group Index |
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
Our peer group index for 2018 consists of Rayonier Inc., St. Joe Co., Universal Forest Products Inc. and Weyerhaeuser Co. Returns are weighted based on market capitalizations as of the beginning of each year. Deltic was included in our peer group index in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Deltic has been excluded from our peer group index in the above table and graph for all years presented due to the merger with our wholly-owned subsidiary in 2018. Our 2018 return includes the impact of the Deltic earnings and profits special distribution of approximately $3.54 per share described above.
The performance graph above is being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of our filings, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation in such filing.
22
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in thousands - except per share amounts) |
|
2018 1 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 2 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 3 |
|
|||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
974,579 |
|
|
$ |
678,595 |
|
|
$ |
599,099 |
|
|
$ |
575,336 |
|
|
$ |
606,950 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
122,880 |
|
|
$ |
86,453 |
|
|
$ |
10,938 |
|
|
$ |
31,714 |
|
|
$ |
89,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,325,852 |
|
|
$ |
953,079 |
|
|
$ |
927,681 |
|
|
$ |
1,016,612 |
|
|
$ |
1,031,746 |
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)4 |
|
$ |
755,364 |
|
|
$ |
573,319 |
|
|
$ |
583,988 |
|
|
$ |
603,881 |
|
|
$ |
625,668 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity |
|
$ |
1,314,779 |
|
|
$ |
200,542 |
|
|
$ |
156,274 |
|
|
$ |
203,736 |
|
|
$ |
225,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures:5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
29,880 |
|
|
$ |
12,855 |
|
|
$ |
5,866 |
|
|
$ |
18,987 |
|
|
$ |
13,261 |
|
Timberlands reforestation and roads |
|
|
17,378 |
|
|
|
15,207 |
|
|
|
13,422 |
|
|
|
13,745 |
|
|
|
10,971 |
|
Real estate development expenditures |
|
|
5,049 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
52,307 |
|
|
$ |
28,062 |
|
|
$ |
19,288 |
|
|
$ |
32,732 |
|
|
$ |
24,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
Dividends per share6 |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.525 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.425 |
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Basic |
|
|
60,534 |
|
|
|
40,824 |
|
|
|
40,798 |
|
|
|
40,842 |
|
|
|
40,749 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
61,814 |
|
|
|
41,227 |
|
|
|
41,033 |
|
|
|
40,988 |
|
|
|
40,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
In February 2018, Deltic merged into a wholly-owned subsidiary of Potlatch for total consideration of $1.1 billion of our common stock. See Note 2: Deltic Merger in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
2 |
In the second quarter of 2016, we sold approximately 172,000 acres of timberlands located in central Idaho for $114 million at a loss of $48.5 million before taxes and repaid $42.6 million of revenue bonds. |
3 |
In December 2014, we acquired approximately 201,000 acres of timberland in Alabama and Mississippi for a total purchase price of $384 million, which was funded with $310 million of new term loans and cash on hand. |
4 |
Long-term debt as of December 31, 2018 excludes the $29 million of revenue bonds for the MDF facility which is classified as held for sale. See Note 3: Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
5 |
Does not include the acquisition of timber and timberlands. |
6 |
Does not include the Deltic earnings and profits special distribution of $222.0 million or approximately $3.54 per share paid on November 15, 2018. See Note 4: Earnings Per Share in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
23
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Introduction
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Part I - Item 1. Business and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
We are a leading timberland real estate investment trust (REIT) with operations in seven states where we own approximately 1.9 million acres of timberland, six sawmills, an industrial grade plywood mill and real estate development projects.
Our business is organized into three business segments: Resource, Wood Products and Real Estate. Our Resource segment supplies our Wood Products segment with a portion of its wood fiber needs. These intersegment revenues are based on prevailing market prices and typically represent a significant portion of the Resource segment’s total revenues. Our other segments generally do not generate intersegment revenues. In the discussion of our consolidated results of operations, our revenues and costs and expenses are reported after elimination of intersegment revenues and costs and expenses. In the business segment discussions, each segment’s revenues and costs and expenses, as applicable, are presented before elimination of intersegment revenues and costs and expenses.
The operating results of our Resource, Wood Products and Real Estate business segments have been and will continue to be influenced by a variety of factors, including the cyclical nature of the forest products industry, changes in timber prices and in harvest levels from our timberlands, competition, timberland valuations, demand for our non-strategic timberland for higher and better use purposes, lumber prices, weather conditions, the efficiency and level of capacity utilization of our Wood Products manufacturing operations, changes in our principal expenses such as log costs, asset dispositions or acquisitions and other factors. See Part I ‑ Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional information.
As part of the Deltic merger, we identified a target of $50 million in annual Cash Available for Distribution (CAD) synergies arising from the merger which were achieved by the end of the third quarter 2018. Synergies were tracked in four categories: 1) increased sustainable harvest; 2) expanded lumber production; 3) REIT tax savings; and 4) lower selling, general and administrative expenses and other improvements. The following table summarizes the target savings:
Target Savings |
|
|
Description |
||
Sustainable harvest |
$ |
10 |
|
|
Increased harvest to sustainable levels in line with industry standards |
Expanded lumber production |
|
18 |
|
|
Lumber production gains from capital investments in additional drying capacity, increased operating hours and additional improvements |
REIT tax savings |
|
7 |
|
|
Qualified Deltic assets taxed as a REIT |
SG&A and other |
|
15 |
|
|
Personnel reductions, system and process integration along with a number of small operational improvements |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
Overview
Summary of 2018
The demand for timber is directly affected by the underlying demand for lumber and other wood-products, pulp, paper and packaging. Our Resource and Wood Products segments are impacted by demand for new homes in the United States (U.S.) housing market and by repair and remodeling activity.
24
During 2018, new home demand and repair and remodeling activity continued to reflect moderate improvement supported by low unemployment, wage growth, household formation and consumer confidence. Across the nation, multifamily developments are attracting a variety of individuals with an interest in urban life, low maintenance costs and walkability which continued to fuel multifamily construction. The millennial generation has started to form households and have children, which combined with the favorable economic backdrop, should support an ongoing recovery in new single-family home construction.
Lumber pricing during 2018 was a tale of two halves. In the first half of 2018 increased lumber demand coupled with transportation issues led to higher lumber prices. After reaching an all-time record high in early June, lumber prices declined significantly as the transportation issues eased and Canadian lumber manufacturers worked to clear their backlog. The second half of the year also experienced torrential rain in Texas, the largest homebuilding market in the U.S., two major hurricanes and slowing housing demand due to higher home prices and higher mortgage rates. Markets have since stabilized.
For our Resource segment, we index a significant portion of our Idaho sawlogs to the price of lumber under long-term supply agreements. The Northern region experienced favorable log pricing as a result of the strength in lumber markets in the first half of the year before starting to decline in the latter part of the year when they reset with falling lumber prices. The Southern region has seen pine sawlog prices remain relatively flat as markets continue to have ample log availability to meet growing demand.
Our Real Estate segment benefited during 2018 from rural real estate sales primarily in Minnesota and Arkansas, including the first sales of rural and development real estate acquired in the Deltic merger. With the Deltic merger, we acquired real estate developments predominantly concentrated in Chenal Valley, a premier upscale master planned community in West Little Rock, Arkansas. Residential and commercial sales in Chenal Valley mainly follow the national housing market trends but do experience microeconomic factors for the area including economic growth and the availability of builders, contractors and workforce to support development efforts.
Summary of 2017
With over half of our total revenues indexed to lumber, increased lumber sale prices contributed to strong results for 2017. We also benefited from higher cedar log prices and a greater mix of cedar. Our lumber mills continued to have improved lumber recovery and better grade yield. Production increased almost 50 MMBF to set a new company record. The Real Estate segment continued to sell non-core timberlands at margins in excess of 60%.
Summary of 2016
During 2016, all three of our business segments contributed to our positive results. The Resource segment achieved planned harvest volumes despite challenging weather conditions. The capital projects completed in 2015 at each of our lumber mills resulted in improved lumber recovery, better grade yield and increased production. The Real Estate segment sold approximately 172,000 acres of non-strategic timberlands located in central Idaho for $114 million and closed three large conservation sales during the year.
Non-GAAP Measures
To supplement our financial statements presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), we use certain non-GAAP measures on a consolidated basis, including Adjusted EBITDDA and CAD, which are defined and further explained and reconciled to the nearest GAAP measure in the Liquidity and Performance Measures section below. Refer to Note 21: Segment Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the use of segment Adjusted EBITDDA and a reconciliation of such measures as required by GAAP. Our definitions of these non-GAAP measures may differ from similarly titled measures used by others. These non-GAAP measures should be considered supplemental to and not a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Management uses Adjusted EBITDDA as a performance measure. Adjusted EBITDDA is a non-GAAP measure that management uses to allocate resources between segments and to evaluate performance about the business and that investors can use to evaluate the operational performance of the assets under management. It removes the impact of specific items that management believes do not directly reflect the core business operations on an ongoing basis. This measure should not be considered in isolation from and is not intended to represent an
25
alternative to, our results reported in accordance with GAAP. Management believes that this non-GAAP measure, when read in conjunction with our GAAP financial statements, provides useful information to investors by facilitating the comparability of our ongoing operating results over the periods presented, the ability to identify trends in our underlying business and the comparison of our operating results against analyst financial models and operating results of other public companies that supplement their GAAP results with non-GAAP financial measures.
Our definition of Adjusted EBITDDA may be different from similarly titled measures reported by other companies. We define Adjusted EBITDDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion, amortization, the basis of real estate sold, non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit costs, gains and losses on disposition of fixed assets, acquisition costs included in cost of goods sold, environmental charges, Deltic merger-related costs, non-cash impairments and other special items.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS
The following table sets forth year-over-year changes in items included in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Our Business Segment Results provide a more detailed discussion of our segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs. |
|
|
vs. |
|
|||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
974,579 |
|
|
$ |
678,595 |
|
|
$ |
599,099 |
|
|
$ |
295,984 |
|
|
$ |
79,496 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
707,645 |
|
|
|
469,393 |
|
|
|
460,600 |
|
|
|
238,252 |
|
|
|
8,793 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
59,861 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
|
|
44,262 |
|
|
|
9,865 |
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
Deltic merger-related costs |
|
|
22,119 |
|
|
|
3,409 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
18,710 |
|
|
|
3,409 |
|
Environmental charges for Avery Landing |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,978 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
(4,978 |
) |
|
|
3,956 |
|
Gain on lumber price swap |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,088 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
(1,088 |
) |
Loss on sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
48,522 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(48,522 |
) |
|
|
|
789,625 |
|
|
|
526,688 |
|
|
|
554,406 |
|
|
|
262,937 |
|
|
|
(27,718 |
) |
Operating income |
|
|
184,954 |
|
|
|
151,907 |
|
|
|
44,693 |
|
|
|
33,047 |
|
|
|
107,214 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(35,227 |
) |
|
|
(27,049 |
) |
|
|
(28,941 |
) |
|
|
(8,178 |
) |
|
|
1,892 |
|
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit costs |
|
|
(7,648 |
) |
|
|
(6,384 |
) |
|
|
(9,139 |
) |
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
2,755 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
142,079 |
|
|
|
118,474 |
|
|
|
6,613 |
|
|
|
23,605 |
|
|
|
111,861 |
|
Income tax (provision) benefit |
|
|
(19,199 |
) |
|
|
(32,021 |
) |
|
|
4,325 |
|
|
|
12,822 |
|
|
|
(36,346 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
122,880 |
|
|
$ |
86,453 |
|
|
$ |
10,938 |
|
|
$ |
36,427 |
|
|
$ |
75,515 |
|
Adjusted EBITDDA1 |
|
$ |
297,193 |
|
|
$ |
195,757 |
|
|
$ |
134,453 |
|
|
$ |
101,436 |
|
|
$ |
61,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
See Liquidity and Performance Measures for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDDA to net income, the closest comparable GAAP measure, for each of the years presented. |
2018 compared with 2017
Revenues
Revenues were $974.6 million, an increase of $296.0 million, or 43.6%, compared to 2017. This increase includes revenue of $265.3 million from over 10 months of Deltic sales following the merger. Revenues also increased year over year as we experienced overall higher realizations on sawlogs in the Northern region due to the effect of higher lumber prices on indexed Idaho sawlogs during the first half of the year and we sold 8,000 acres of non-strategic timberlands in Minnesota during 2018 to a conservation entity for $900 per acre.
Cost of goods sold
Cost of goods sold increased $238.3 million, or 50.8%, compared with the same period in 2017, primarily due to the addition of the Deltic operations in 2018.
26
Depletion, depreciation and amortization increased $43.2 million in 2018 primarily as a result of the following:
|
• |
Depletion increased $26.8 million, of which $21.8 million was due to harvest activities on the acquired Deltic land. In addition, increased depletion rates in the Southern legacy Potlatch timberlands contributed to the depletion increase in the South. |
|
• |
Depreciation increased $14.7 million primarily due to the addition of the Deltic sawmills and MDF facility during the year. |
Basis of land sold increased $9.9 million compared to 2017 due to the mix of sales along with the sales of non-strategic Deltic timberlands and sales of development land in Chenal Valley following the Deltic merger.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
SG&A expenses for 2018 were $59.9 million compared with $50.0 million in 2017 primarily due to the acquired Deltic operations.
Deltic merger-related costs
Merger-related costs for 2018 were $22.1 million compared to $3.4 million for 2017. This included $12.2 million for investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting and appraisal fees and other costs related to filing the joint proxy/prospectus for the merger. Restructuring costs were $9.9 million, consisting primarily of termination benefits, which included accelerated share-based payment costs for qualifying terminations.
Avery Landing
During the third quarter of 2017, we accrued $5.0 million related to Avery Landing proceeding, which was settled in April 2018. See Note 20: Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Lumber price swap
In April 2017, we entered into a lumber price swap to fix the price on a total of 36 million board feet (mmbf) of southern yellow pine with an effective date of July 1, 2017 and a termination date of December 31, 2017. Under the contract, beginning in July 2017, cash settlement on 6 mmbf occurred each month. Changes in the fair value of the derivative were recorded directly into income as it was not designated as a hedging relationship. We did not enter into lumber price swaps during 2018. See Note 13: Derivative Instruments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest expense, net
Interest expense, net was $35.2 million, compared with $27.0 million for the same period in 2017. The $8.2 million increase was primarily due to the $230.0 million in long-term debt assumed or refinanced in connection with the Deltic merger. Refer to Note 12: Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed discussion of our borrowings.
Income tax provision
Provision for income taxes for 2018 was $19.2 million compared with $32.0 million for the prior year period. Income taxes are primarily due to income or loss generated from our PotlatchDeltic TRS. For 2018, the PotlatchDeltic TRS’s income before income tax was $100.3 million compared to $59.5 million in 2017. The increase in the PotlatchDeltic TRS’s income before income tax was primarily the result of higher lumber prices and the acquired Deltic wood products operations. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Act was enacted, which contained significant changes to corporate taxation, including the reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, effective January 1, 2018. The primary impact of the Tax Act in 2018 was a reduction to our PotlatchDeltic TRS’s effective tax rate, resulting in an estimated $10.1 million tax savings in 2018. During 2018, we also recorded a tax benefit of $5.0 million primarily related to deducting contributions to our qualified pension plans made in 2018 at the higher 2017 income tax rate. In addition to the higher corporate tax rate in
27
2017, compared to 2018, the income tax provision for 2017 included a $10.7 million charge as a result of remeasured deferred tax assets, net at the lower tax rate.
Adjusted EBITDDA
Adjusted EBITDDA for 2018 was $297.2 million, an increase of $101.4 million or 51.8% compared to 2017. The increase in Adjusted EBITDDA was driven primarily by increased Southern harvests, overall higher lumber pricing per MBF and increased Wood Product segment volumes due to the addition of Deltic operations. Refer to the Business Segments Results below for further discussions on activities for each of our segments. See Liquidity and Performance Measures for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDDA to net income, the closest comparable GAAP measure, for each of the periods presented.
2017 compared with 2016
Revenues
Revenues increased $79.5 million, or 13.3%, due to 20.7% higher lumber sales prices and a 7.0% increase in lumber shipments, partially offset by a 5.3% decrease in harvest volumes. We sold 5,536 less acres, resulting in a 6.0% reduction in Real Estate revenue.
Cost of goods sold
Cost of goods sold increased 1.9% due to higher fiber and manufacturing costs due to increased manufacturing volumes, partially offset by a decrease in the average land basis of real estate sold due to geographic mix.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
The increase of $5.7 million in selling, general and administrative expenses included higher annual incentive plan expense due to strong results and higher workers’ compensation expense, partially offset by lower pension expense resulting from updated mortality tables. Approximately 70% of selling, general and administrative expenses are considered Corporate and not allocated to the segments.
Environmental charges for Avery Landing
During 2017, we accrued $5.0 million related to Avery Landing, compared with $1.0 million in 2016. See Note 20: Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Deltic merger-related costs
During 2017 we incurred approximately $3.4 million of costs directly attributable to the Deltic merger, which was announced in October 2017, including investment banking, legal, accounting, filing and appraisal fees, as well as other costs.
Gain on lumber price swap
As described above, we entered into lumber swap during 2017 to fix the price on a total of 36 mmbf of southern yellow pine and recognized $1.1 million in cash settlements on this swap during 2017. We did not enter into lumber swaps during 2016.
Income taxes
Income taxes are typically due to income or loss from the PotlatchDeltic TRS. The PotlatchDeltic TRS had income before tax of $59.5 million for 2017 and a loss before income tax of $14.0 million for 2016. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Act was enacted that decreased the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, repealed the domestic production deduction and altered taxation of executive compensation and employer provided benefits, as well as other changes. PotlatchDeltic TRS remeasured deferred tax assets and liabilities at the reduced tax rate, resulting in a $10.7 million charge to the provision in 2017.
28
Adjusted EBITDDA for 2017 was $195.8 million, an increase of $61.3 million or 45.6% compared to 2016. The increase in Adjusted EBITDDA was driven primarily by increased sawlog prices in the North and increased lumber pricing. These increases were offset by net decreases in harvest volumes in both the North and South and fewer rural real estate acres sold. Refer to the Business Segments Results below for further discussions on activities for each of our segments. See Liquidity and Performance Measures for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDDA to net income, the closest comparable GAAP measure, for each of the periods presented.
Resource Segment
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
vs. |
|
|
vs. |
|
|||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||||
Revenues1 |
|
$ |
354,950 |
|
|
$ |
278,199 |
|
|
$ |
256,163 |
|
|
$ |
76,751 |
|
|
$ |
22,036 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logging and hauling |
|
|
146,568 |
|
|
|
117,827 |
|
|
|
117,583 |
|
|
|
28,741 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
Other |
|
|
31,009 |
|
|
|
27,015 |
|
|
|
25,968 |
|
|
|
3,994 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
6,650 |
|
|
|
6,461 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Adjusted EBITDDA2 |
|
$ |
169,834 |
|
|
$ |
126,707 |
|
|
$ |
106,151 |
|
|
$ |
43,127 |
|
|
$ |
20,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Prior to elimination of intersegment fiber revenues of $115.9 million, $71.4 million and $57.1 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. |
2 |
Management uses Adjusted EBITDDA to evaluate the performance of the company. See Note 21: Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Adjusted EBITDDA
The following table summarizes Adjusted EBITDDA variances for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared with the year ended December 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared with the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 vs 2017 |
|
|
2017 vs 2016 |
|
|||
Adjusted EBITDDA - prior year |
|
$ |
126,707 |
|
|
$ |
106,151 |
|
Production volume |
|
|
51,437 |
|
|
|
(4,349 |
) |
Sales price and mix |
|
|
(16,816 |
) |
|
|
27,141 |
|
Other revenue |
|
|
5,059 |
|
|
|
(411 |
) |
Logging and hauling |
|
|
8,304 |
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
Forest management |
|
|
(628 |
) |
|
|
(972 |
) |
Indirect and overhead costs |
|
|
(4,229 |
) |
|
|
(264 |
) |
Adjusted EBITDDA - current year |
|
$ |
169,834 |
|
|
$ |
126,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Adjusted EBITDDA for 2018 was $169.8 million, an increase of $43.1 million, or 34.0% compared to 2017. The change in Adjusted EBITDDA was primarily the result of the following:
|
• |
Increased sales volume of 1.5 million tons compared to 2017, primarily due to the merger with Deltic. This increase contributed approximately $51.4 million in Adjusted EBITDDA. |
|
• |
Other Resource revenue contributed $5.1 million to Adjusted EBITDDA, primarily due to additional acres from the Deltic merger which allows for more acres available for hunting leases and natural gas and oil royalties. |
|
• |
Logging and hauling cost per ton declined year over year primarily due to a higher mix of Southern volume which carries an overall lower cost per ton. This mix shift impacted Adjusted EBITDDA by $8.3 million in 2018, compared to 2017. |
|
• |
Forest management, indirect and overhead costs decreased Adjusted EBITDDA by $4.9 million compared to 2017 primarily due to the addition of Deltic operations. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percent of revenue was 2.1% in 2018 compared to 2.4% in 2017. |
2017 compared with 2016
Adjusted EBITDDA for 2017 was $126.7 million, an increase of $20.6 million, or 19.4% compared to 2016. The change in Adjusted EBITDDA was primarily the result of the following:
|
• |
Sales volume decreased compared to 2016, primarily due to lower stumpage volume in the Southern region. There was also a decrease in 2017 Northern region sawlog volumes primarily due to the sale of central Idaho timberlands in the second quarter of 2016. Northern region pulpwood sales were down compared to 2016 due to trucking shortages. These declines decreased Adjusted EBITDDA by $4.3 million compared to 2016. |
|
• |
Sawlog prices in the Northern region increased 23.3% primarily due to higher indexed lumber prices, higher cedar pricing and a greater mix of cedar. This increase contributed $27.1 million to Adjusted EBITDDA. |
|
• |
Logging and hauling cost per ton decreased Adjusted EBITDDA $0.6 million primarily due to higher fuel prices, partially offset by higher delivered sawlog and pulpwood volumes in the Southern region which carries an overall lower cost compared to the Northern region. |
|
• |
Forest management, indirect and overhead costs decreased Adjusted EBITDDA by $1.2 million compared to 2016 primarily due to additional fertilization of timberland in 2017. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percent of revenue was 2.4% in 2017 compared to 2.5% in 2016. |
30
|
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
vs. |
|
|
vs. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Harvest Volumes (in tons) |
|
2018 |
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||||
Northern region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sawlog |
|
|
1,714,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,711,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,809,288 |
|
|
|
2,566 |
|
|
|
(97,700 |
) |
Pulpwood |
|
|
146,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
146,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
194,414 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
(48,012 |
) |
Stumpage |
|
|
13,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
18,592 |
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
(6,465 |
) |
Total |
|
|
1,874,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,870,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,022,294 |
|
|
|
4,189 |
|
|
|
(152,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sawlog |
|
|
1,853,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
933,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
853,377 |
|
|
|
919,809 |
|
|
|
79,851 |
|
Pulpwood |
|
|
1,593,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,168,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,115,647 |
|
|
|
425,679 |
|
|
|
52,578 |
|
Stumpage |
|
|
221,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
41,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
244,201 |
|
|
|
180,395 |
|
|
|
(203,050 |
) |
Total |
|
|
3,668,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,142,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,213,225 |
|
|
|
1,525,883 |
|
|
|
(70,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total harvest volume |
|
|
5,542,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,012,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,235,519 |
|
|
|
1,530,072 |
|
|
|
(222,798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Price/Unit ($ per ton) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern region1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sawlog |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
Pulpwood |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
Stumpage |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern region1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sawlog |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Pulpwood |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
Stumpage |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
1 |
Sawlog and pulpwood sales prices are on a delivered basis, which includes contracted logging and hauling costs charged to the customer. Stumpage sales provide our customers the right to harvest standing timer. As such, the customer contracts the logging and hauling and bears such costs. |
Wood Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|||||||||||
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
vs. |
|
|
vs. |
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
680,931 |
|
|
$ |
441,157 |
|
|
$ |
367,426 |
|
|
$ |
239,774 |
|
|
$ |
73,731 |
|
Costs and expenses1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber costs |
|
|
273,716 |
|
|
|
182,090 |
|
|
|
165,585 |
|
|
|
91,626 |
|
|
|
16,505 |
|
Freight, logging and hauling |
|
|
81,398 |
|
|
|
50,929 |
|
|
|
48,410 |
|
|
|
30,469 |
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
184,800 |
|
|
|
122,982 |
|
|
|
118,150 |
|
|
|
61,818 |
|
|
|
4,832 |
|
Finished goods inventory change |
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
(1,159 |
) |
|
|
(3,654 |
) |
|
|
3,056 |
|
|
|
2,495 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
8,537 |
|
|
|
5,691 |
|
|
|
5,361 |
|
|
|
2,846 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
Adjusted EBITDDA2 |
|
$ |
130,583 |
|
|
$ |
80,624 |
|
|
$ |
33,574 |
|
|
$ |
49,959 |
|
|
$ |
47,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Prior to elimination of intersegment fiber costs of $115.9 million, $71.4 million and $57.1 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. |
2 |
Management uses Adjusted EBITDDA to evaluate the performance of the company. See Note 21: Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
31
The following table summarizes Adjusted EBITDDA variances for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared with the year ended December 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared with the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 vs 2017 |
|
|
2017 vs 2016 |
|
||
Adjusted EBITDDA - prior year |
|
$ |
80,624 |
|
|
$ |
33,574 |
|
Lumber: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price |
|
|
26,871 |
|
|
|
52,669 |
|
Volume |
|
|
21,251 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
Log costs |
|
|
(12,702 |
) |
|
|
(6,513 |
) |
Processing costs |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
131 |
|
Residuals, panels and other |
|
|
23,862 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Administrative and overhead |
|
|
(6,287 |
) |
|
|
689 |
|
Adjusted EBITDDA - current year |
|
$ |
130,583 |
|
|
$ |
80,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 compared with 2017
Adjusted EBITDDA for 2018 was $130.6 million, an increase of $50.0 million, or 62.0%, compared to 2017. The increase in Adjusted EBITDDA is primarily the result of the following:
|
• |
Lumber sales prices increased 7.5% to $457 per MBF compared with $425 per MBF during 2017. This increase contributed approximately $26.9 million to Adjusted EBITDDA compared to 2017. |
|
• |
Lumber shipments increased 278.7 million board feet to 1.0 billion board feet during 2018 compared to 736.7 million board feet in 2017. This increase contributed $21.3 million to Adjusted EBITDDA compared to 2017. |
|
• |
Increased log cost and processing costs decreased Adjusted EBITDDA $12.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively, compared to 2017. These impacts were primarily due to higher per unit log costs, particularly in Idaho where sawlog prices are indexed to lumber prices along with the addition of the Deltic mills. |
|
• |
Residuals, panels and other contributed $23.9 million to Adjusted EBITDDA compared to 2017. Increased residual sales due to the addition of Deltic sawmills, a focus on higher margin products for our panel mill along with the addition of the MDF facility in 2018 contributed to the increase. The increased sales were offset by additional freight costs compared to 2017, primarily due to the addition of the MDF facility. |
|
• |
Higher administrative and overhead costs, primarily due to the addition of the Deltic operations decreased Adjusted EBITDDA by $6.3 million compared to 2017. |
2017 compared with 2016
Adjusted EBITDDA was $80.6 million, an increase of $47.1 million, or 140.1% compared to 2017. The increase in Adjusted EBITDDA is primarily the result of the following:
|
• |
Lumber prices increased 20.7% to $425 per MBF compared with $352 per MBF in 2017. This increase contributed $52.7 million to Adjusted EBITDDA. |
32
|
• |
Increased log costs decreased Adjusted EBITDDA $6.5 million compared to 2016. Fiber costs increased due to elevated production volumes and higher per unit log costs, particularly in Idaho where sawlog prices are indexed to lumber prices. |
|
• |
Lower administrative and overhead costs contributed $0.7 million to Adjusted EBITDDA compared to 2016, primarily due to a $1.1 million gain on lumber price swap. There were no similar swaps in 2016. |
Wood Products Segment Statistics
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
vs. |
|
|
vs. |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||||
Lumber shipments (MBF)1 |
|
|
1,015,385 |
|
|
|
736,667 |
|
|
|
688,229 |
|
|
|
278,718 |
|
|
|
48,438 |
|
Lumber sales prices ($ per MBF) |
|
$ |
457 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
1 |
MBF stands for thousand board feet. |
Real Estate Segment
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
vs. |
|
|
vs. |
|
|||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
54,566 |
|
|
$ |
30,655 |
|
|
$ |
32,604 |
|
|
$ |
23,911 |
|
|
$ |
(1,949 |
) |
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
10,097 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
7,918 |
|
|
|
(309 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
1,409 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
Adjusted EBITDDA1 |
|
$ |
40,304 |
|
|
$ |
25,720 |
|
|
$ |
27,582 |
|
|
$ |
14,584 |
|
|
$ |
(1,862 |
) |
1 |
Management uses Adjusted EBITDDA to evaluate the performance of the company. See Note 21: Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Adjusted EBITDDA
The following table summarizes Adjusted EBITDDA variances for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared with the year ended December 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared with the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 vs 2017 |
|
|
2017 vs 2016 |
|
||
Adjusted EBITDDA - prior year |
|
$ |
25,720 |
|
|
$ |
27,582 |
|
Rural real estate sales |
|
|
5,369 |
|
|
|
(1,949 |
) |
Real estate development sales |
|
|
13,199 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(1,413 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
Other costs, net |
|
|
(2,571 |
) |
|
|
308 |
|
Adjusted EBITDDA - current year |
|
$ |
40,304 |
|
|
$ |
25,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Adjusted EBITDDA for 2018 increased $14.6 million to $40.3 million compared with $25.7 million in 2017. The increase in Adjusted EBITDDA is primarily the result of the following:
|
• |
Real estate development sales contributed $13.2 million to Adjusted EBITDDA in 2018 compared to 2017. In Chenal Valley we sold 13 commercial acres for a total of $4.5 million and 101 residential lots at an average price of $74,753. There were no similar sales in 2017, as the development business was added in 2018 as part of the Deltic merger. |
These increases in Adjusted EBITDDA were offset by increased selling, general and administrative expenses and other expenses primarily due to the addition of the real estate development and Chenal Country Club activities in 2018 following the Deltic merger.
2017 compared with 2016
Adjusted EBITDDA for 2017 decreased $1.9 million to $25.7 million compared with $27.6 million in 2016. The decrease in Adjusted EBITDDA is primarily the result of the following:
|
• |
During 2017 we sold 17,007 acres, which included a large conservation sale in Alabama. In 2016, we sold 22,543 acres, which also included a large conservation sale in Alabama. |
In the second quarter of 2016, we sold approximately 172,000 acres of timberlands located in central Idaho for $114.0 million, resulting in a loss of $48.5 million before tax. We purchased the property in 2007 and 2008 for the purpose of growing and harvesting timber and selling rural recreational parcels.
Real Estate Segment Statistics
Rural Real Estate
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Acres Sold |
|
|
Average Price/Acre |
|
|
Acres Sold |
|
|
Average Price/Acre |
|
|
Acres Sold |
|
|
Average Price/Acre |
|
||||||
Higher and better use (HBU) |
|
|
5,391 |
|
|
$ |
3,065 |
|
|
|
6,440 |
|
|
$ |
2,505 |
|
|
|
5,267 |
|
|
$ |
2,338 |
|
Rural real estate |
|
|
8,925 |
|
|
$ |
1,264 |
|
|
|
9,993 |
|
|
$ |
1,394 |
|
|
|
12,911 |
|
|
$ |
1,246 |
|
Non-strategic timberland |
|
|
9,125 |
|
|
$ |
903 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
$ |
1,033 |
|
|
|
4,365 |
|
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
|
|
23,441 |
|
|
$ |
2,449 |
|
|
|
17,007 |
|
|
$ |
1,803 |
|
|
|
22,543 |
|
|
$ |
1,446 |
|
Central Idaho timberland |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
171,598 |
|
|
$ |
665 |
|
Total |
|
|
23,441 |
|
|
$ |
2,449 |
|
|
|
17,007 |
|
|
$ |
1,803 |
|
|
|
194,141 |
|
|
$ |
756 |
|
Development Real Estate
|
|
2018 |
|
|||||
|
|
Lots or Acres Sold |
|
|
Average $/Lot or Acre |
|
||
Residential lots |
|
|
101 |
|
|
$ |
74,753 |
|
Commercial acres |
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
347,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
At December 31, 2018, our cash and cash equivalents were $76.6 million, a decrease of $43.8 million. This decrease is primarily due:
|
• |
Cash contributions to our qualified pension plans of $52.1 million, including a $44.0 million voluntary contribution allowing us to deduct the amount on our 2017 income tax return at higher tax rates; |
|
• |
$19.7 million in cash payments associated with merger expenses; |
|
• |
Cash payments of $44.4 million as part of the Deltic earnings and profits special distribution to stockholders; |
|
• |
Cash dividends of $102.3 million in 2018 compared to $61.9 million in 2017. |
These cash outflows were partially offset by cash generated from Deltic operations and higher lumber prices during the first half of 2018.
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash provided from operating activities was $178.9 million for 2018, compared with $162.7 million for 2017. This $16.2 million increase was primarily attributable to increased cash receipts from customers of $295.2 million, partially offset by increased vendor payments of $228.8 million. These increases are primarily related to the increased transaction volumes associated with the Deltic merger. See Business Segment Results for additional information.
In addition to increases in customer receipts and vendor payments in 2018 compared to 2017, cash provided by operating activities in 2018 was also affected by:
|
• |
Total cash payments of $19.7 million associated with merger expenses compared to $3.3 million in 2017. |
|
• |
Cash contributions to our qualified pension plans increased $46.8 million, driven by a $44.0 million voluntary contribution which allowed us to deduct the amount on our 2017 income tax return at higher tax rates. |
|
• |
An increase in cash interest payments of $8.4 million, primarily due to debt assumed in connection with the Deltic merger. |
Net cash provided by operating activities was $162.7 million in 2017, compared with $102.1 million in 2016. The increase of $60.6 million was primarily the result of the following:
|
• |
Cash received from customers increased $86.8 million, primarily due to higher lumber sale prices and increased lumber shipments in 2017 over 2016. Further discussion of revenues is included in Business Segment Results. |
|
• |
Cash paid for interest decreased $1.9 million due to reductions in long-term debt in 2017. |
35
The following partially offset the increases in 2017:
|
• |
Income tax payments were $15.8 million in 2017, compared with tax refunds of $8.1 million in 2016. As a result of the loss on sale of central Idaho timberlands in the second quarter of 2016, we received a $5.5 million tax refund. In addition, during 2016 we received $2.1 million from estimated tax payments made in 2015 and $0.5 million from the carryback of certain tax credits. |
|
• |
Cash contributions to our qualified pension plans were $4.0 million higher in 2017. |
Net Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $47.9 million in 2018, compared with net cash used in investing activities of $50.0 million in 2017 and $93.4 million provided by investing activities in 2016.
|
• |
During 2018, we invested $27.3 million in our Wood Products operations and spent $17.2 million in Resource, primarily to replant harvested timberlands. These amounts were partially offset by Deltic’s cash balance of $3.4 million at the merger date. |
|
• |
In 2017, we used $28.1 million for capital expenditures and $22.0 million for the acquisition of timber and timberlands. |
|
• |
In 2016, the net proceeds from the sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands were $111.5 million, partially offset by $19.3 million used for capital expenditures. |
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $172.0 million in 2018, $74.8 million in 2017 and $120.8 million in 2016.
|
• |
During 2018, we repaid $20.3 million of net debt and $2.4 million in loan fees. |
|
• |
Cash distributions to stockholders were $146.8 million in 2018. This included $44.4 million of cash paid as part of the Deltic earnings and profits special distribution. Our quarterly dividend increased approximately $10.0 million due to the issuance of 22.0 million additional shares to complete the Deltic merger in February 2018, and 4.8 million additional shares related to the earnings and profit distribution in November 2018. |
|
• |
Net cash used in financing activities in 2017 was primarily attributable to $11.0 million in long-term debt repayments and $61.9 million of dividends to stockholders. |
|
• |
Net cash used in financing activities in 2016 was primarily attributable to the $42.6 million repayment of Minnesota revenue bonds, $60.8 million of dividends to stockholders and $6.0 million for the repurchase of common stock. |
Sale of MDF Facility
On December 20, 2018 we entered into an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement with Roseburg Forest Products Co. to sell our MDF facility for $92.0 million. The purchase price is subject to adjustment post-closing for any change in certain working capital amounts. The sale closed on February 12, 2019 and will result in approximately $43.0 million in net cash proceeds after income taxes and Roseburg’s assumption of $29.0 million of revenue bond obligations.
36
We expect to fund our 2019 dividends with cash generated by our operations. There are limits on our ability to utilize cash dividends from PotlatchDeltic TRS to our REIT to fund our dividend. In particular, at least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year as a REIT must be derived from sales of our standing timber and other types of real estate income. No more than 25% of our gross income may consist of dividends from PotlatchDeltic TRS and other non-qualifying types of income. This requirement may limit our ability to fund dividends to stockholders using cash flows from PotlatchDeltic TRS. On February 14, 2019 the board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.40 per share payable on March 29, 2019 to stockholders of record as of March 8, 2019.
We invest cash in maintenance and discretionary capital expenditures for our facilities in our Wood Products operations. We evaluate discretionary capital improvements based on an expected level of return on investment. We also invest cash in the reforestation of timberlands and construction of roads in our Resource operations and to develop land in our Real Estate development operations. We expect we will spend approximately $65 to $70 million in Woods Products, Resource and Real Estate segments in 2019.
On August 30, 2018, the board of directors authorized the repurchase up to $100.0 million of common stock with no time limit set for the repurchase. No shares were repurchased in 2018. Stock repurchases in the future will depend on a variety of factors including our cash position, debt covenant restrictions and our stock price.
Capital Structure
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Long-term debt (including current portion)1 |
|
$ |
755,364 |
|
|
$ |
573,319 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(76,639 |
) |
|
|
(120,457 |
) |
Net debt |
|
|
678,725 |
|
|
|
452,862 |
|
Market capitalization2 |
|
|
2,137,915 |
|
|
|
2,026,539 |
|
Enterprise value |
|
$ |
2,816,640 |
|
|
$ |
2,479,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt to enterprise value |
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
Dividend yield3 |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Weighted-average cost of debt, after tax4 |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
1 |
Long-term debt excludes $29.0 million of revenue bonds which have been classified as held for sale. |
2 |
Market capitalization is based on outstanding shares of 67.6 million and 40.6 million times closing share prices of $31.64 and $49.90 as of December 31, 2018, and December 29, 2017, respectively. |
3 |
Dividend yield is based on annualized dividends per share of $1.60 and $1.53 divided by share prices of $31.64 and $49.90 as of December 31, 2018, and December 29, 2017, respectively. |
4 |
Weighted-average cost of debt is based on outstanding principal balances only. The weighted-average cost of debt for 2018 includes the impact of the Senior Note refinancing in January 2019 described below and in Note 12: Debt in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Liquidity and Performance Measures
The discussion below is presented to enhance the reader’s understanding of our operating performance, ability to generate cash and satisfy rating agency and creditor requirements. This information includes two measures: Adjusted EBITDDA and CAD. These measures are not defined by GAAP and the discussion of Adjusted EBITDDA and CAD is not intended to conflict with or change any of the GAAP disclosures described herein.
Management uses Adjusted EBITDDA as a performance measure. Adjusted EBITDDA is a non-GAAP measure that management uses to allocate resources between segments and to evaluate performance about the business and that investors can use to evaluate the operational performance of the assets under management. It removes the impact of specific items that management believes do not directly reflect the core business operations on an ongoing basis. This measure should not be considered in isolation from and is not intended to represent an alternative to, our results reported in accordance with GAAP. Management believes that this non-GAAP measure, when read in conjunction with our GAAP financial statements, provides useful information to investors by facilitating the comparability of our ongoing operating results over the periods presented, the ability to identify trends in our underlying business and the comparison of our operating results against analyst financial models and operating results of other public companies that supplement their GAAP results with non-GAAP financial measures.
37
Our definition of Adjusted EBITDDA may be different from similarly titled measures reported by other companies. We define Adjusted EBITDDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion, amortization, the basis of real estate sold, non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit costs, gains and losses on disposition of fixed assets, acquisition costs included in cost of goods sold, environmental charges, Deltic merger-related costs, non-cash impairments and other special items.
We reconcile Adjusted EBITDDA to net income for the consolidated company as it is the most comparable GAAP measures. See Note 21: Segment Information to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for the reconciliation required by GAAP for our segments.
The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDDA for the respective periods:
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
122,880 |
|
|
$ |
86,453 |
|
|
$ |
10,938 |
|
Interest, net |
|
|
35,227 |
|
|
|
27,049 |
|
|
|
28,941 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
19,199 |
|
|
|
32,021 |
|
|
|
(4,325 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
70,848 |
|
|
|
28,432 |
|
|
|
32,211 |
|
Basis of real estate sold |
|
|
16,698 |
|
|
|
6,827 |
|
|
|
8,011 |
|
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit costs |
|
|
7,648 |
|
|
|
6,384 |
|
|
|
9,139 |
|
Inventory purchase price adjustment in cost of goods sold1 |
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Environmental charges for Avery Landing |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,978 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
Deltic merger related costs2 |
|
|
22,119 |
|
|
|
3,409 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Loss on the sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands3 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
48,522 |
|
Loss (gain) on fixed assets |
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Adjusted EBITDDA |
|
$ |
297,193 |
|
|
$ |
195,757 |
|
|
$ |
134,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
The effect on cost of goods sold of fair value adjustments to the carrying amount of inventory acquired in business combinations. |
2 |
Integration and restructuring costs related to the merger with Deltic. See Note 18: Merger, Integration and Other Costs in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
3 |
In 2016, we sold approximately 172,000 acres of timberlands located in central Idaho for $144 million at a loss of $48.5 million before tax. |
We define CAD as cash provided by operating activities adjusted for capital spending for purchases of property, plant and equipment, timberlands reforestation and roads and acquisition of timber and timberlands. Management believes CAD is a useful indicator of the company’s overall liquidity, as it provides a measure of cash generated that is available for dividends to common stockholders (an important factor in maintaining our REIT status), repurchase of the company’s common shares, debt repayment, acquisitions and other discretionary and nondiscretionary activities. Our definition of CAD is limited in that it does not solely represent residual cash flows available for discretionary expenditures since the measure does not deduct the payments required for debt service and other contractual obligations. Therefore, we believe it is important to view CAD as a measure that provides supplemental information to our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Our definition of CAD may be different from similarly titled measures reported by other companies, including those in our industry. CAD is not necessarily indicative of the CAD that may be generated in future periods.
38
The following table provides a reconciliation of Net Cash from Operating Activities to CAD:
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Net cash provided by operating activities1 |
|
$ |
178,894 |
|
|
$ |
162,659 |
|
|
$ |
102,117 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(52,135 |
) |
|
|
(50,105 |
) |
|
|
(20,532 |
) |
CAD |
|
$ |
126,759 |
|
|
$ |
112,554 |
|
|
$ |
81,585 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities2 |
|
$ |
(47,909 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,020 |
) |
|
$ |
93,351 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
$ |
(172,001 |
) |
|
$ |
(74,766 |
) |
|
$ |
(120,809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Cash from operating activities for the years ended 2018 and 2017 includes cash paid for Deltic merger-related costs of $19.7 million and $3.3 million, respectively, and cash paid for real estate development expenditures of $5.0 million and $0, respectively. |
2 |
Net cash from investing activities includes payments for capital expenditures, which is also included in our reconciliation of CAD. |
Sources of Financing
Credit Agreement
On February 14, 2018, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Amended Credit Agreement) with an expiration date of April 13, 2023 which amended and restated our existing amended and restated credit agreement dated August 12, 2014. The Amended Credit Agreement increases our revolving line of credit to $380.0 million, which may be increased by up to an additional $420.0 million. It also includes a sublimit of $75.0 million for the issuance of standby letters of credit and a sublimit of $25.0 million for swing line loans. Usage under either or both sub facilities reduces availability under the revolving line of credit. Pricing is consistent with the 2014 amended and restated credit agreement. The limitation on timberland acre sales was eliminated. At December 31, 2018, there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving line of credit and approximately $1.0 million of capacity under our credit agreement was utilized by outstanding letters of credit, resulting in $379.0 million available for additional borrowings.
We may also utilize borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement to, among other things, refinance existing indebtedness and provide funding for working capital requirements, capital projects, acquisitions and other general corporate expenditures.
The Amended Credit Agreement contains certain covenants that limit our ability and that of our subsidiaries to create liens, merge or consolidate, dispose of assets, incur indebtedness and guarantees, repurchase or redeem capital stock and indebtedness, make certain investments or acquisitions, enter into certain transactions with affiliates or change the nature of our business. The Amended Credit Agreement also contains financial maintenance covenants including the maintenance of a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. We will be permitted to pay dividends to our stockholders under the terms of the Amended Credit Agreement so long as we expect to remain in compliance with the financial maintenance covenants.
Term Loans
On March 22, 2018, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement (Amended Term Loan Agreement), which amended the existing amended and restated term loan agreement dated December 14, 2014. The Amended Term Loan Agreement includes an additional $100.0 million of new loans and a $100.0 million loan assumed in connection with the Deltic merger. The $100.0 million of new loans represent a refinancing of credit facility borrowings acquired from Deltic. The Amended Term Loan Agreement also allows for incremental future borrowings in an amount not to exceed $150.0 million. The limitation on timberland acre sales was eliminated. At December 31, 2018 the Amended Term Loan Agreement contains covenants similar to the Amended Credit Agreement.
In January 2019, we refinanced $150.0 million of 7.5% Senior Notes with a $150.0 million term loan under the Amended Term Loan Agreement that will mature in 2029. The new term loan carries a variable rate of one-month LIBOR plus 1.85%. Concurrent with the borrowing, we entered into an interest rate swap associated with the new term loan to fix the rate at 4.56%. Upon the refinancing, we redeemed and paid all outstanding Senior Notes, including a redemption premium of $4.9 million.
39
The table below sets forth the financial covenants in the Amended Credit Agreement and Amended Term Loan Agreement and our status with respect to these covenants as of December 31, 2018:
|
Covenant Requirement |
|
|
Actual December 31, 2018 |
|
|
Interest Coverage Ratio |
≥ |
3.00 to 1.00 |
|
|
7.75 |
|
Leverage Ratio |
≤ |
40% |
|
|
20% |
|
The Interest Coverage Ratio is EBITDDA, which is defined as net income adjusted for interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, the basis of real estate sold and non-cash equity compensation expense, divided by interest expense for the same period.
The Leverage Ratio is our Total Funded Indebtedness divided by our Total Asset Value. Our Total Funded Indebtedness consists of long-term debt, including any current portion of long-term debt, revolving line of credit borrowings and the amount outstanding under the letter of credit sub facility.
Total Asset Value (TAV) includes the estimated fair value of timberlands, the book basis of our Wood Products manufacturing facilities (limited to 10% of TAV), the book basis of Construction in Progress (limited to 10% of TAV), the book basis of the Pro Rata Share of Investment Affiliates (limited to 15% of TAV), cash and cash equivalents and company-owned life insurance (limited to 5% of TAV). Construction in Progress means, as of any date, (a) the construction of a new operating facility or (b) an expansion with greater than $10 million of capital expenditures to an existing facility. Investment Affiliate means any person in which any member of the Consolidated Parties (PotlatchDeltic and its wholly-owned subsidiaries), directly or indirectly, has an ownership interest, whose financial results are not consolidated into our financial statements.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders
The following table summarizes the historical tax characteristics of dividends and special distributions to shareholders for the years ended December 31:
(Amounts per share) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
Non-taxable return of capital |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total dividends |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special distribution - qualified dividend |
|
$ |
3.54 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Distribution
On August 30, 2018, the board of directors approved a special distribution of $222.0 million, or approximately $3.54 per share. The special distribution amount equaled the company’s determination of the accumulated earnings and profits of Deltic as of the merger date and was distributed in order to maintain the company’s qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The special distribution was paid on November 15, 2018, to stockholders of record on September 27, 2018. Common stockholders had the option to elect to receive the special distribution in the form of stock or cash, with the total cash payment to all stockholders limited to no more than 20%, or $44.4 million (Cash Amount), of the total distribution. The number of shares distributed was determined based upon common stockholder elections and the volume weighted average price for the company’s common stock over the period from November 12 through November 14 of $36.88. As such, the company issued 4,814,673 shares of its common stock and distributed $44.4 million for the Cash Amount in connection with the special distribution.
40
Two major debt rating agencies routinely evaluate our debt and our cost of borrowing can increase or decrease depending on our credit rating. During 2018, both Moody’s and Standard and Poor upgraded our debt rating to investment-grade.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no off-balance sheet financing agreements or guarantees as defined by Item 303 of Regulation S-K as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 that we believe are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018:
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Within 1 Year |
|
|
2-3 Years |
|
|
4-5 Years |
|
|
More Than 5 Years |
|
|||||
Long-term debt1 |
|
$ |
762,235 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
86,000 |
|
|
$ |
83,000 |
|
|
$ |
553,235 |
|
Interest on long-term debt2 |
|
|
179,071 |
|
|
|
29,771 |
|
|
|
50,568 |
|
|
|
43,623 |
|
|
|
55,109 |
|
Operating leases3 |
|
|
15,149 |
|
|
|
5,130 |
|
|
|
7,277 |
|
|
|
2,167 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
Purchase obligations4 |
|
|
30,109 |
|
|
|
13,527 |
|
|
|
14,305 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other long-term liabilities5 |
|
|
12,512 |
|
|
|
7,007 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
999,076 |
|
|
$ |
95,435 |
|
|
$ |
160,166 |
|
|
$ |
133,083 |
|
|
$ |
610,392 |
|
2 |
Amounts presented for interest payments assume that all long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2018 will remain outstanding until maturity and interest rates on variable rate debt in effect as of December 31, 2018 will remain in effect until maturity. Estimated cash flows related to interest rate swaps are also included in this category. Estimated cash flows also include the interest rate swap that was entered in conjunction with the refinancing of the Senior Notes in January 2019. |
3 |
See Note 20: Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
4 |
Purchase obligations primarily include open purchase orders for goods or services that are legally binding on us and that specify fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased. Purchase obligations also include commitments for construction contracts and commitments to complete real estate development projects. Purchase obligations exclude arrangements that we can cancel without penalty. |
5 |
Other long-term liabilities consist of certain employee-related obligations, Idaho cost share roads, deferred compensation and unrecognized tax benefits. We estimate that we will make qualified and non-qualified pension plan and other postretirement employee benefit plan payments of $6 million in 2019. Due to the uncertainty of payment timing and amounts, we have not included estimated payments for pension and postretirement funding beyond 2019. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require management to make estimates that affect the amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities reported. The following are critical accounting policies and estimates, which are both very important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and which require some of management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. The accounting for these matters involves forming estimates based on current facts, circumstances and assumptions which, in management’s judgment, could change in a manner that would materially affect management’s future estimates with respect to such matters and, accordingly, could cause our future reported financial condition and results of operations to differ materially from financial results reported based on management’s current estimates.
Business combinations. We recognize identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition date estimated fair value. Goodwill, if any, as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions for the purchase price allocation process to value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to the extent that we identify adjustments to the preliminary purchase price allocation. We recognize measurement period adjustments and any resulting effect
41
on earnings during the period in which the adjustment is identified. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our consolidated statement of operations. See Note 2: Deltic Merger in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Pension benefits. The determination of net periodic pension expense, funded status and the requirements for funding our pension plans are based on a number of actuarial assumptions that require judgment. The most significant assumption is the discount rate used to value the current cost of future pension obligations as different assumptions would change the net periodic pension expense and the funded status of the benefit plans. At the end of every year, we review our estimates with external advisers and adjust these estimates as appropriate. We use these estimates to calculate plan asset and liability information as of year-end as well as pension expense for the following year. Actual experience that differs from our estimates or any changes in our estimates could have a significant effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. See Note 15: Savings Plans, Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Employee Benefits in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of our assumptions and sensitivity of such assumptions,
PROSPECTIVE ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See new accounting pronouncements in Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
42
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our market risk exposure on financial instruments includes interest rate risk on our bank credit facility, term loans and interest rate swap agreements. All market risk sensitive instruments were entered into for purposes other than trading purposes. We do not attempt to hedge our exposure to interest rate risk for our cash equivalents.
The interest rates applied to borrowings under our credit facility adjust often and therefore react quickly to any movement in the general trend of market interest rates. We do not attempt to mitigate the effects of short-term interest rate fluctuations on our credit facility borrowings through the use of derivative financial instruments. There were no borrowings under our credit facility at December 31, 2018.
We are exposed to interest rate risk through our variable rate debt instruments. At December 31, 2018, we had four interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $207.5 million. The swaps convert variable rates ranging from 1.90% to 2.15% plus 3-month and 1-month LIBOR to fixed rates ranging from 3.88% to 4.82%. See Note 13: Derivative Instruments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
In January 2019, we entered into a $150.0 million interest rate swap associated with the refinance or our senior notes. The swap converted a variable rate of 1.85% plus 1-month LIBOR to a fixed rate of 4.56%. See Note 12: Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Quantitative Information about Market Risks
The table below provides information about our long-term debt, weighted-average interest rates and interest rate swaps. For debt obligations, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For interest rate swaps, the table presents notional amounts and weighted-average interest rates by expected (contractual) maturity dates. Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract. Weighted-average variable rates are based on implied forward rates in the yield curve.
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2019 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
||||||||
Variable rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal due |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
277,500 |
|
|
$ |
397,500 |
|
|
$ |
397,500 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
|
4.56 |
% |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4.52 |
% |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal due |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
43,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
275,735 |
|
|
$ |
364,735 |
|
|
$ |
359,022 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4.60 |
% |
|
|
4.49 |
% |
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable to fixed |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
277,500 |
|
|
$ |
357,500 |
|
|
$ |
(3,786 |
) |
Average pay rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.84 |
% |
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Average receive rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
2.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Debt maturities reflect the January 2019 refinancing of our $150.0 million Senior Notes which matures in 2029, and exclude $29.0 million of revenue bonds maturing 2027, which have been classified as held for sale. See Note 3: Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest rate swap notional amounts, average rates, and fair value include a $150.0 million variable-to-fixed swap related to the refinancing of our senior notes. The fair value of the swap was in a liability position of approximately $2.4 million as of January 31, 2019. See Note 12: Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
43
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
PotlatchDeltic Corporation:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PotlatchDeltic Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 27, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), effective January 1, 2018.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1952.
Seattle, Washington
February 27, 2019
44
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amount) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Revenues |
|
$ |
974,579 |
|
|
$ |
678,595 |
|
|
$ |
599,099 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
707,645 |
|
|
|
469,393 |
|
|
|
460,600 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
59,861 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
|
|
44,262 |
|
Deltic merger-related costs |
|
|
22,119 |
|
|
|
3,409 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Environmental charges for Avery Landing |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,978 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
Gain on lumber price swap |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,088 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Loss on sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
48,522 |
|
|
|
|
789,625 |
|
|
|
526,688 |
|
|
|
554,406 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
184,954 |
|
|
|
151,907 |
|
|
|
44,693 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(35,227 |
) |
|
|
(27,049 |
) |
|
|
(28,941 |
) |
Non-operating pension and other postretirement employee benefit costs |
|
|
(7,648 |
) |
|
|
(6,384 |
) |
|
|
(9,139 |
) |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
142,079 |
|
|
|
118,474 |
|
|
|
6,613 |
|
Income tax (provision) benefit |
|
|
(19,199 |
) |
|
|
(32,021 |
) |
|
|
4,325 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
122,880 |
|
|
$ |
86,453 |
|
|
$ |
10,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.525 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
Special distribution per share |
|
$ |
3.54 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
60,534 |
|
|
|
40,824 |
|
|
|
40,798 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
61,814 |
|
|
|
41,227 |
|
|
|
41,033 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
45
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
122,880 |
|
|
$ |
86,453 |
|
|
$ |
10,938 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other postretirement employee benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) gain arising during the period, net of tax (benefit) expense of $(5,521), $3,990 and $(1,826) |
|
|
(15,714 |
) |
|
|
11,355 |
|
|
|
(2,857 |
) |
Amortization of actuarial loss included in net periodic cost, net of tax expense of $4,654, $6,248 and $7,042 |
|
|
13,246 |
|
|
|
9,773 |
|
|
|
11,014 |
|
Amortization of prior service credit included in net periodic cost, net of tax benefit of $(2,260), $(3,350) and $(3,260) |
|
|
(6,432 |
) |
|
|
(5,239 |
) |
|
|
(5,099 |
) |
Cash flow hedges, net of tax (benefit) expense of $(119), $3, and $448 |
|
|
(2,415 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
(11,315 |
) |
|
|
15,893 |
|
|
|
3,759 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
111,565 |
|
|
$ |
102,346 |
|
|
$ |
14,697 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
46
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
76,639 |
|
|
$ |
120,457 |
|
Customer receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $368 and $260 |
|
|
21,405 |
|
|
|
11,240 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
60,805 |
|
|
|
50,132 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
22,675 |
|
|
|
11,478 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
80,674 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
262,198 |
|
|
|
193,307 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
272,193 |
|
|
|
77,229 |
|
Investment in real estate held for development and sale |
|
|
79,537 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Timber and timberlands, net |
|
|
1,672,815 |
|
|
|
654,476 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
19,796 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
17,828 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
21,281 |
|
|
|
8,271 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,325,852 |
|
|
$ |
953,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
60,993 |
|
|
$ |
55,201 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
39,973 |
|
|
|
14,263 |
|
Current portion of pension and other postretirement employee benefits |
|
|
5,997 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
Liabilities held for sale |
|
|
29,321 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
136,284 |
|
|
|
74,798 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
715,391 |
|
|
|
559,056 |
|
Pension and other postretirement employee benefits |
|
|
110,659 |
|
|
|
103,524 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities, net |
|
|
32,009 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
16,730 |
|
|
|
15,159 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,011,073 |
|
|
|
752,537 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, authorized 4,000,000 shares, no shares issued |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares, issued 67,569,799 and 40,611,991 shares |
|
|
67,570 |
|
|
|
40,612 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,659,031 |
|
|
|
359,144 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(282,391 |
) |
|
|
(104,363 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(129,431 |
) |
|
|
(94,851 |
) |
Total stockholders’ equity |
|
|
1,314,779 |
|
|
|
200,542 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |
|
$ |
2,325,852 |
|
|
$ |
953,079 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
47
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
122,880 |
|
|
$ |
86,453 |
|
|
$ |
10,938 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
73,161 |
|
|
|
29,912 |
|
|
|
34,190 |
|
Basis of real estate sold |
|
|
16,698 |
|
|
|
6,827 |
|
|
|
8,011 |
|
Change in deferred taxes |
|
|
12,161 |
|
|
|
15,364 |
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
Pension and other postretirement employee benefits |
|
|
16,443 |
|
|
|
13,151 |
|
|
|
15,661 |
|
Equity-based compensation expense |
|
|
8,206 |
|
|
|
4,722 |
|
|
|
4,390 |
|
Loss on sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
48,522 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(1,221 |
) |
|
|
(1,872 |
) |
|
|
(1,198 |
) |
Change in working capital, net of business acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
2,822 |
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
(3,712 |
) |
Inventories, net |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
(17,460 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(3,996 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(473 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(5,212 |
) |
|
|
11,591 |
|
|
|
7,232 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(6,173 |
) |
|
|
(4,291 |
) |
|
|
(4,537 |
) |
Real estate development expenditures |
|
|
(5,049 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Funding of qualified pension plans |
|
|
(52,099 |
) |
|
|
(5,275 |
) |
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
178,894 |
|
|
|
162,659 |
|
|
|
102,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(29,880 |
) |
|
|
(12,855 |
) |
|
|
(5,866 |
) |
Timberlands reforestation and roads |
|
|
(17,378 |
) |
|
|
(15,207 |
) |
|
|
(13,422 |
) |
Acquisition of timber and timberlands |
|
|
(4,877 |
) |
|
|
(22,043 |
) |
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
Net proceeds from sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
111,460 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents acquired in merger |
|
|
3,419 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Transfer from company owned life insurance (COLI) |
|
|
1,796 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
6,384 |
|
Transfer to COLI |
|
|
(1,027 |
) |
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
|
|
(3,967 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(47,909 |
) |
|
|
(50,020 |
) |
|
|
93,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to common stockholders |
|
|
(146,768 |
) |
|
|
(61,931 |
) |
|
|
(60,842 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(5,956 |
) |
Proceeds from Potlatch revolving line of credit |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Repayment of Potlatch revolving line of credit |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
Repayment of Deltic revolving line of credit |
|
|
(106,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
93,235 |
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(14,250 |
) |
|
|
(11,000 |
) |
|
|
(113,335 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(4,983 |
) |
|
|
(1,835 |
) |
|
|
(3,911 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(172,001 |
) |
|
|
(74,766 |
) |
|
|
(120,809 |
) |
Change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
(41,016 |
) |
|
|
37,873 |
|
|
|
74,659 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period |
|
|
120,457 |
|
|
|
82,584 |
|
|
|
7,925 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period |
|
$ |
79,441 |
|
|
$ |
120,457 |
|
|
$ |
82,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (received) during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
34,490 |
|
|
$ |
26,125 |
|
|
$ |
28,051 |
|
Income taxes, net |
|
$ |
10,800 |
|
|
$ |
15,845 |
|
|
$ |
(8,081 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
48
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional Paid- |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive |
|
|
Total Stockholders' |
|
|||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
in Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Equity |
|
||||||
Balance, December 31, 2015 |
|
40,680,713 |
|
|
$ |
40,681 |
|
|
$ |
350,541 |
|
|
$ |
(72,983 |
) |
|
$ |
(114,503 |
) |
|
$ |
203,736 |
|
Net income |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,938 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,938 |
|
Equity-based compensation expense |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,390 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,390 |
|
Shares issued for stock compensation |
|
8,263 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Pension plans and OPEB obligations |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,058 |
|
|
|
3,058 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
(169,625 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(5,786 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(5,956 |
) |
Cash flow hedges |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
Common dividends, $1.50 per share |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(60,842 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(60,842 |
) |
Other transactions, net |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
249 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2016 |
|
40,519,351 |
|
|
$ |
40,519 |
|
|
$ |
355,274 |
|
|
$ |
(128,775 |
) |
|
$ |
(110,744 |
) |
|
$ |
156,274 |
|
Net income |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
86,453 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
86,453 |
|
Equity-based compensation expense |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,722 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,722 |
|
Shares issued for stock compensation |
|
92,640 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Pension plans and OPEB obligations |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15,889 |
|
|
|
15,889 |
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Common dividends, $1.525 per share |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(61,931 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(61,931 |
) |
Other transactions, net |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(869 |
) |
Balance, December 31, 2017 |
|
40,611,991 |
|
|
$ |
40,612 |
|
|
$ |
359,144 |
|
|
$ |
(104,363 |
) |
|
$ |
(94,851 |
) |
|
$ |
200,542 |
|
Net income |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
122,880 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
122,880 |
|
Equity-based compensation expense |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,206 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,206 |
|
Shares issued for stock compensation |
|
162,007 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Pension plans and OPEB obligations |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(8,900 |
) |
|
|
(8,900 |
) |
Cash flow hedges |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,415 |
) |
|
|
(2,415 |
) |
Cumulative effects of adoption of accounting standards |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
24,564 |
|
|
|
(23,265 |
) |
|
|
1,299 |
|
Common dividends, $1.60 per share |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(102,333 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(102,333 |
) |
Common stock issued for Deltic merger |
|
21,981,128 |
|
|
|
21,981 |
|
|
|
1,120,794 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,142,775 |
|
Deltic earnings and profits special distribution, $3.54 per share |
|
4,814,673 |
|
|
|
4,815 |
|
|
|
172,750 |
|
|
|
(222,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(44,435 |
) |
Other transactions, net |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,701 |
) |
|
|
(1,139 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,840 |
) |
Balance, December 31, 2018 |
|
67,569,799 |
|
|
$ |
67,570 |
|
|
$ |
1,659,031 |
|
|
$ |
(282,391 |
) |
|
$ |
(129,431 |
) |
|
$ |
1,314,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
49
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
GENERAL
We are primarily engaged in activities associated with timberland management, including the sale of timber, the management of approximately 1.9 million acres of timberlands and the purchase and sale of timberlands. We are also engaged in the manufacture and sale of wood products and the development of real estate. Our timberlands, real estate development projects and all of our wood products facilities are located within the continental United States. The primary market for our products is the United States. We converted to a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) effective January 1, 2006. As described in Note 2: Deltic Merger, on February 20, 2018 Deltic Timber Corporation (Deltic) merged into our wholly-owned subsidiary.
CONSOLIDATION
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of PotlatchDeltic Corporation and its subsidiaries after the elimination of intercompany transactions and accounts. There are no unconsolidated subsidiaries.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which we refer to in this report as U.S. GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash equivalents are investments that are highly liquid with original maturities of three months or less when purchased. At December 31, 2018 we had restricted cash of $2.8 million included in other long-term assets related to proceeds held by a qualified intermediary that are intended to be reinvested in timberlands. The following provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
76,639 |
|
|
$ |
120,457 |
|
|
$ |
82,584 |
|
Restricted cash included in other long-term assets |
|
|
2,802 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash |
|
$ |
79,441 |
|
|
$ |
120,457 |
|
|
$ |
82,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
We recognize identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition date estimated fair value. Goodwill, if any, as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions for the purchase price allocation process to value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to the extent that we identify adjustments to the preliminary purchase price allocation. We recognize measurement period adjustments and any resulting effect on earnings during the period in which the adjustment is identified. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our Consolidated Statement of Income.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
For our Resource segment we generate revenue predominantly in the form of delivered logs, pay-as-cut stumpage contracts, lump sum stumpage contracts or timber deeds. On delivered log sales, revenue includes amounts billed for logging and hauling and is recognized at the point the logs are delivered and scaled. Revenue is recognized on timber deeds and lump sum stumpage contracts generally upon closing or when the contracts are effective, which is the point at which the buyer assumes risk of loss associated with the standing timber. We enter into pay-as-cut contracts with customers that provide the customer with the right of access to harvest timber on a specified area of our land. At the execution of the agreement, the customer typically does not take title, control or risk of ownership to the timber. Revenue for pay-as-cut contracts is recognized once scaling occurs as that is the point when control of the harvested trees has transferred to the customer and we have a right to payment.
For our Wood Products segment we generate revenue from the sale of manufactured wood products and residual by-products. We consider several factors in determining when control transfers to the customer including when legal title transfers to the customer, we have a present right to payment, and the customer has assumed the risks and rewards of ownership. Shipping terms generally indicate when title and control have passed. For products shipped with terms FOB (free on board) shipping point we recognize revenue upon shipment to the customer. For products where shipping terms are FOB destination, revenue is recognized when the goods are received by the customer.
For our Real Estate segment we recognize revenue on substantially all our real estate sales at closing as that is when the customer obtains control of the property. Sales of non-core timberland and real estate development activities are considered to be part of our normal operations. We therefore classify revenue and costs associated with real estate sold in revenues and cost of goods sold, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Cash generated from real estate sales is included as an operating activity in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
While sales taxes are not typical, in the event sales taxes are collected, revenue is recognized net of any sales tax and sales taxes are recorded as a current liability and remitted to the appropriate governmental entities.
Costs for shipping and handling are included in cost of goods sold in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
See Note: 5 Revenue Recognition for additional information.
Sales of large parcels of property, such as our sale of central Idaho timberlands in 2016, which do not represent our core operations and are of such a size as to not be indicative of our ongoing operations, are presented as a net gain or loss in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Cash generated from these sales is included as an investing activity in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
INVENTORIES
For most of our operations, the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method is used to determine the cost of logs, lumber and plywood. Inventories valued under LIFO are stated as the lower of cost or market. Inventories not valued under LIFO are recorded at the lower of average cost or net realizable value. Expenses associated with idle capacity or other curtailments of production are reflected in cost of goods sold in the periods incurred.
51
Property, plant and equipment are valued at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of buildings, equipment and other depreciable assets is determined using the straight-line method of depreciation.
Major improvements and replacements of property are capitalized. Maintenance, repairs and minor improvements and replacements are expensed. Upon retirement or other disposition of property, applicable cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts. Any gains or losses are included in operating income.
RECOVERY OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Our long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We evaluate recoverability of an asset group by comparing its carrying value to the future net undiscounted cash flows that we expect will be generated by the asset group. If the comparison indicates that the carrying value of an asset group is not recoverable, we recognize an impairment loss for the excess of carrying value over the estimated fair value. When we recognize an impairment loss for assets to be held and used, we depreciate the adjusted carrying amount of those assets over their remaining useful life. There were no events or changes in circumstances that indicated the carrying amounts of our long-lived held and used assets were not recoverable during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 or 2016.
We also perform a test for recoverability when management has committed to a plan to sell or otherwise dispose of an asset group. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. We did not impair any of our long-lived assets during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
TIMBER AND TIMBERLANDS
Timber and timberlands are valued at cost less accumulated depletion and amortization. We capitalize costs related to stand establishment, which include the preparation of the land for planting, seeds or seedlings and tree planting costs, which include third-party labor costs, materials and other contract services. Upon completion of planting activities and field inspection to confirm the planting operation was successful, a plantation will be considered “established.”
Subsequent expenditures to maintain the integrity or enhance the growth of an established plantation or stand are expensed. Post-establishment expenses include vegetation control, fertilization, thinning operations and the replanting of seedlings lost through mortality. Forest management costs are considered current operating expenses and include property taxes and insurance, silviculture costs incurred subsequent to stand establishment, cruising of timber volume, property maintenance, salaries, supplies, travel, record-keeping, fire protection and other normal recurring administrative personnel costs.
Timberland acquisitions, which are typically considered asset acquisitions, are capitalized based on the relative appraised values of timberland, merchantable timber, pre-production timber (young growth that is not yet merchantable timber), logging roads and other land improvements.
The estimated volume of current standing merchantable timber, which is a component of calculating our depletion rates, is updated at least annually to reflect increases due to the reclassification of pre-production timber to merchantable timber when it meets defined diameter specifications, the annual growth of merchantable timber and the acquisition of additional merchantable timber, decreases due to timber harvests and land sales and changes resulting from other factors, such as environmental or casualty losses. Timber volumes are estimated from cruises of the timber tracts, which are completed on our timberlands on approximately a five to ten year cycle.
Depletion represents the amount charged to expense as timber is harvested. Rates at which timber is depleted are calculated annually for each of our depletion pools by dividing the beginning of year balance of the merchantable timber accounts by the volume of standing merchantable timber, after estimated timber volume updates.
The base cost of logging roads, such as clearing, grading and ditching, is not amortized and remains a capitalized item until disposition. Other portions of the initial logging road cost, such as bridges, culverts and gravel surfacing are amortized over their useful lives, which range from 5 to 20 years. Costs associated with temporary logging road spurs, which are typically used for one harvest season, are expensed as incurred.
52
We recorded intangible assets in connection with the Deltic merger. We have both indefinite-lived and long-lived intangible assets. Long-lived intangible assets include customer relationships and certain trade names we estimate have a finite life and are being amortized over 10 and 20 years, respectively, and are evaluated for impairment under our Recovery of Long-Lived Assets policy described above. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized and are tested for potential impairments annually as of October 1, or during the year if an event or other circumstance indicates that we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of the assets. We did not impair any intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2018.
We record all derivatives in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Dependent on the designation of the derivative instrument, changes in fair value are recorded to earnings or stockholders’ equity through other comprehensive income (loss). We use interest rate swap agreements to hedge against changing interest rates. For interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges, the net gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The interest rate swap agreements effectively convert a portion of floating rate debt to a fixed rate basis, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense.
If a hedge ceases to qualify for hedge accounting, the contract would continue to be carried on the balance sheet at fair value until settled and have the adjustments to the contract’s fair value recognized in earnings. If a forecasted transaction were no longer probable to occur, amounts previously deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) would be recognized immediately in earnings.
We have International Swap Dealers Association ("ISDA") Master Agreements with each counterparty that permits the net settlement of amounts owed under their respective contracts. The ISDA Master Agreement is an industry standardized contract that governs all derivative contracts entered into between the company and the respective counterparty. Under these master netting agreements, net settlement generally permits the company or the counterparty to determine the net amount payable or receivable for contracts due on the same date for similar types of derivative transactions. We have not elected to offset the fair value positions of the derivative contracts recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note: 13 Derivative Instruments for additional details.
COMPANY OWNED LIFE INSURANCE
We are the beneficiary of insurance policies on the lives of certain past officers and employees. We have recognized the amount that could be realized upon surrender of the insurance policies in other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. COLI expense and interest income are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and interest expense, net, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The net effect of these amounts on income was not significant for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Cash receipts and disbursements are recorded as investing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
We recognize any overfunded or underfunded status of our defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and recognize changes in the funded status through comprehensive income (loss) in the year in which the changes occur. The funded status and the requirements for funding our pension plans are based on a number of actuarial assumptions that require judgment. The determination of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit expense includes:
|
• |
costs of benefits provided in exchange for employees’ services rendered; |
|
• |
interest cost of the obligation; |
|
• |
expected long-term return on plan assets for funded plans; |
|
• |
amortization of prior service costs and plan amendments over the average remaining service period of the active employee group covered by the plan; and |
53
Different assumptions would change the net periodic pension and postretirement benefit expense and the funded status of the benefit plans. See Note 15: Savings Plans, Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Employee Benefits for additional details.
EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION
Equity-based awards are measured at fair value on the dates they are granted or modified. Equity-based compensation expense is recognized based upon the portion of the award that vests over the applicable vesting period of the awards using the straight-line method. These measurements establish the cost of the equity-based awards for accounting purposes. The cost of the equity-based award is then recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income over each employee’s requisite service period. See Note 17: Equity-Based Compensation Plans for more information about our equity-based compensation.
INCOME TAXES
We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured pursuant to tax laws using rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We recognize the effect of a change in income tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date of the rate change. We record a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized.
We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities. The determination is based on the technical merits of the position and presumes that each uncertain tax position will be examined by the relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. For further information, see Note 19: Income Taxes.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
New Accounting Standards Recently Adopted
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014‑09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606, which requires an entity to recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 also included other guidance, including the presentation of a gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset or a nonfinancial asset. We adopted ASU No. 2014-09 on January 1, 2018 using the cumulative effect method. There was no adjustment to accumulated deficit upon adoption. Adoption of this ASU resulted in expanded disclosures but did not otherwise have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, processes or internal controls. See Note 5: Revenue Recognition for our expanded disclosures.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which reduces the complexity in the accounting standards by allowing the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis through a $1.3 million cumulative-effect adjustment directly to accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2018.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash, which requires entities to include in their cash and cash-equivalent balances in the statement of cash flows those amounts that are deemed to be restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The ASU does not define the terms restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The company adopted ASU 2016-
54
18 during the first quarter of 2018, applying the standard retrospectively to all periods presented. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on our historical consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-1, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The standard provides guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or a business. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018 and accounted for the merger with Deltic as an acquisition of a business.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715), Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires an entity to present service cost within compensation expense and the other components of net benefit cost outside of income from operations. We adopted this ASU retrospectively on January 1, 2018 and have reclassified non-service costs from operating income to non-operating costs. There was no change to income before income taxes. The adjustments made to the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Previously Reported |
|
|
Effect of Change |
|
|
As Adjusted |
|
|
Previously Reported |
|
|
Effect of Change |
|
|
As Adjusted |
|
|||||||
Operating income |
$ |
145,523 |
|
|
|
6,384 |
|
|
$ |
151,907 |
|
|
$ |
35,554 |
|
|
|
9,139 |
|
|
$ |
44,693 |
|
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which amends and simplifies existing guidance to allow companies to more accurately present the economic effects of risk management activities in the financial statements. ASU 2017-12 requires that when a hedge is deemed effective, hedge accounting must be applied to the entire change in fair value of the hedging instrument eliminating the notion of ineffective portions of the hedge relationship. The entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument will be recorded in the same income statement line item as the hedged item and the ineffective portion will no longer be separately recognized in earnings. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period. ASU 2017-12 is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach with the presentation and disclosure requirements only required on a prospective basis. We adopted ASU 2017-12 effective April 1, 2018, which resulted in no material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-2, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the December 22, 2017, H.R. 1, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act). This ASU is effective for us on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2018 and reclassified the income tax effects of the Act on pension and other postretirement employee benefits and a cash flow hedge within accumulated other comprehensive loss to accumulated deficit. Upon adoption, accumulated other comprehensive loss was increased by $23.3 million, with a corresponding decrease to accumulated deficit. See Note 16: Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.
New Accounting Standards Being Evaluated
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The objective of the new standard is to establish principles for lessees and lessors to report information about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from a lease and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. The new standard establishes a right-of-use model (ROU) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the income statement. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, the lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset to not recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The standard, along with subsequent amendments, is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years; early application is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) its effective date or (2) the beginning of the earliest comparable period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application.
55
We adopted ASU 2016-02, along with subsequent amendments, on January 1, 2019 and used the effective date as our date of initial application. Consequently, financial information will not be updated, and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019. The new standard provides several optional practical expedients in transition and for an entity’s ongoing accounting. We elected the following practical expedients as part of our adoption and implementation of the standard:
|
• |
to not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases; |
|
• |
to not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; |
|
• |
to not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases; |
|
• |
to apply the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify; |
|
• |
to not separate non-lease components from lease components; and |
|
• |
to apply the land easement practical expedient for transition of all existing land easements. |
Upon adoption of this ASU we recorded approximately $14.0 million for right of use assets and lease liabilities for our operating leases. There was no impact to accumulated deficit upon adoption of the standard.
The adoption of this ASU will expand financial statement disclosures beginning March 31, 2019.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15 Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, which clarifies the accounting for implementation costs in cloud computing arrangements. ASU 2018-15 is effective for fiscal years after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those years; early application is permitted. We expect to adopt the standard on January 1, 2020 and are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Topic 715-20): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans, which modifies the disclosure requirements for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans. ASU 2018-14 is effective for fiscal years after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those years; early application is permitted. We expect to adopt the standard on January 1, 2021 and are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those years; early application is permitted. We expect to adopt the standard on January 1, 2020 and are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2. Merger with Deltic
On February 20, 2018 (merger date), Deltic merged into Portland Merger, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Potlatch Corporation. Deltic owned approximately 530,000 acres of timberland, operated two sawmills, a medium density fiberboard facility (MDF) and was engaged in real estate development primarily in Arkansas. The merger creates a combined company with a diversified timberland base of approximately 1.9 million acres, including approximately 930,000 acres in Arkansas. It uniquely positions us to expand our integrated model of timberland ownership and lumber manufacturing, provide tax savings on Deltic’s timber harvest earnings and increase our exposure to the Texas housing market.
Under the merger agreement, each issued and outstanding share of Deltic common stock was exchanged for 1.80 shares of Potlatch common stock, with cash paid in lieu of any fractional shares. Upon consummation of the merger, all outstanding Deltic stock options (which fully vested as of the merger date) and restricted stock units (RSUs) were converted into Potlatch RSUs, after giving effect to the 1.80 exchange ratio. Because the Deltic stock options were fully vested and relate to services rendered to Deltic prior to the merger, the replacement stock options were also fully vested, and their fair value is included in the consideration transferred. A portion of the replacement RSUs relate to services to be performed post-merger and therefore are not included in consideration transferred. See additional details about replacement share-based payment awards in Note 17: Equity-Based Compensation Plans.
56
The following table summarizes the total consideration transferred in the merger:
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
12,121,223 |
|
|
Number of Deltic performance awards2 |
|
90,515 |
|
|
|
12,211,738 |
|
Exchange ratio3 |
|
1.80 |
|
Potlatch shares issued |
|
21,981,128 |
|
Price per Potlatch common share4 |
$ |
51.95 |
|
Aggregate value of Potlatch common shares issued |
$ |
1,141,920 |
|
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares |
14 |
|
|
Fair value of stock options and RSUs5 |
841 |
|
|
Consideration transferred |
$ |
1,142,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Number of shares of Deltic common stock issued and outstanding as of February 20, 2018, net of fractional shares. |
2 |
Number of shares of Deltic performance awards for pre-combination services rendered that vested upon closing of the merger. |
3 |
Exchange ratio per the merger agreement. |
4 |
Closing price of Potlatch common shares on February 20, 2018. |
5 |
Fair value of Deltic stock options for pre-combination services rendered that vested upon closing of the merger, as well as RSUs for pre-combination services rendered. |
We expensed approximately $22.1 million and $3.4 million of merger-related costs during the year-ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 18: Merger, Integration and Other Costs for the components of merger-related costs. These costs are included in Deltic merger-related costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
The amount of revenue and income before income taxes from acquired Deltic operations included in our Consolidated Statement of Income for February 21, 2018 through December 31, 2018 are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|
Net sales |
$ |
265,252 |
|
Income before income taxes |
$ |
21,638 |
|
The following summarizes unaudited pro forma information that presents combined amounts as if this merger occurred at the beginning of 2017:
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Net sales |
$ |
1,013,242 |
|
|
$ |
920,860 |
|
Net earnings attributable to PotlatchDeltic common shareholders |
$ |
145,685 |
|
|
$ |
77,732 |
|
Basic earnings per share attributable to PotlatchDeltic common Shareholders |
$ |
2.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to PotlatchDeltic common shareholders |
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
Pro forma net earnings attributable to PotlatchDeltic common shareholders excludes $27.6 million and $16.8 million of non-recurring merger-related costs incurred by both companies during the year-ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of which $18.9 million were incurred by Deltic prior to the merger.
Pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share assumes issuance of 22.0 million shares that were issued at the merger date and the issuance of 4.8 million shares for the Deltic earnings and profits special distribution as of the beginning of 2017. Refer to Note 4: Earnings Per Share. Pro forma data may not be indicative of the results that would have been obtained had these events occurred at the beginning of the periods presented, nor is it intended to be a projection of future results.
Potlatch Corporation accounted for the merger transaction as the acquirer and has applied the acquisition method of accounting. Our December 31, 2018 Consolidated Balance Sheet includes the assets and liabilities of Deltic
57
assumed by us and have been measured at estimated fair value as of the merger date. The estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined using the income, cost and market approaches, as applicable. The estimated fair value measurements were generally based on significant estimates and assumptions that are not observable in the market and thus represent Level 3 measurements as defined in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, except for certain long-term debt instruments assumed in the merger that were valued using observable market inputs and determined to be Level 2 measurements. The income approach and cost approach were primarily used to value acquired timber and timberlands. The income approach was primarily used to value the intangible assets and the acquired real estate held for development and sale. The income approach estimates fair value for an asset based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated by the asset. Projected cash flows are discounted at estimated rates of return that reflect the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money. The cost approach, which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility, was also used, as appropriate, for property and equipment. The cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the property, less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation. The market approach estimates fair value for an asset based on values of recent comparable transactions to provide further support for the values determined in the income and cost approaches.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value measurements of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the merger date including measurement period adjustments identified:
(Dollars in thousands) |
February 20, 2018 |
|
|
Measurement Period Adjustments |
|
|
As Adjusted February 20, 2018 |
|
|||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
3,419 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
3,419 |
|
Customer receivables |
|
12,709 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
12,709 |
|
Inventories |
|
17,316 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
17,316 |
|
Other current assets |
|
8,276 |
|
|
|
(2,991 |
) |
|
|
5,285 |
|
Real estate held for development and sale |
|
79,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
83,000 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
265,901 |
|
|
|
(5,132 |
) |
|
|
260,769 |
|
Timber and timberlands |
|
1,060,000 |
|
|
|
(4,255 |
) |
|
|
1,055,745 |
|
Mineral rights |
|
— |
|
|
|
6,236 |
|
|
|
6,236 |
|
Trade name and customer relationships intangibles |
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
3,556 |
|
Total assets acquired |
|
1,467,631 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
1,467,535 |
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
12,604 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12,615 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
229,968 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
230,112 |
|
Pension and other postretirement employee benefits |
|
36,909 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
36,909 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities, net |
|
44,439 |
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
44,188 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
936 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
936 |
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
324,856 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
324,760 |
|
Net assets acquired |
$ |
1,142,775 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
1,142,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement period adjustments include:
|
• |
Other current assets adjustment is primarily related to 2017 and 2018 pre-merger Deltic taxes payable estimated at the merger date and adjusted for actual amounts post-merger when the Deltic’s tax returns were filed. |
|
• |
Real estate held for development and sale adjustment is based on continued refinement of information relative to the acreage held for development at the merger date. |
|
• |
Property, plant and equipment adjustment is related to further refinement and review of the assumptions associated with valuation of the acquired buildings and equipment including items such as estimated useful lives and historical maintenance expenditures. |
|
• |
Timber and timberlands adjustment is related to the identification and valuation of mineral rights previously included in the timber and timberlands, net of further revisions to the underlying valuation assumptions. |
58
As a result of these adjustments, during the year-ended ended December 31, 2018 we recorded approximately $0.1 million of additional depreciation, depletion and amortization expense as measurement period adjustments.
NOTE 3. ASSETS AND LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE
On December 20, 2018, we entered into an Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement with Roseburg Forest Products Co. to sell the Deltic MDF facility for a purchase price of approximately $92.0 million, consisting of $63.0 million in cash and assumption of $29.0 million of revenue bonds. The purchase price is subject to post-closing adjustments for certain changes in working capital as defined in the purchase and sale agreement. The transaction closed on February 12, 2019. The assets and liabilities disposed meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale and are reflected as such at their carrying value on the December 31, 2018 Consolidated Balance Sheets.
At December 31, 2018, assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of $80.7 million consists of $72.1 million property, plant & equipment, $7.7 million related to inventories and $0.9 million of customer list intangibles. The related liabilities held for sale of $29.3 million on the December 31, 2018 Consolidated Balance Sheets include $29.0 million of revenue bonds. The sale of the MDF facility is not considered a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on our operations or financial results and therefore does not meet the requirements for presentation as discontinued operations.
NOTE 4. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table reconciles the number of shares used in calculating the basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31:
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
122,880 |
|
|
$ |
86,453 |
|
|
$ |
10,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
60,533,615 |
|
|
|
40,824,420 |
|
|
|
40,797,806 |
|
Incremental shares due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance shares |
|
|
230,437 |
|
|
|
362,509 |
|
|
|
200,164 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
33,969 |
|
|
|
40,459 |
|
|
|
35,470 |
|
Stock portion of earnings and profits distribution |
|
|
1,015,698 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
61,813,719 |
|
|
|
41,227,388 |
|
|
|
41,033,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
For stock-based awards, the dilutive effect is calculated using the treasury stock method. Under this method, the dilutive effect is computed as if the awards were exercised at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and assumes the related proceeds were used to repurchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Related proceeds include future compensation cost associated with the stock award.
At December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, there were 41,980, 250 and 503 stock-based awards, respectively, which were excluded from the calculation of earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive. Anti-dilutive stock-based awards could be dilutive in future periods.
In February 2018, we issued 22.0 million shares in connection with the Deltic merger. On August 30, 2018, the board of directors approved a special distribution of $222.0 million, or approximately $3.54 per share. The special distribution amount equaled the company’s determination of the accumulated earnings and profits of Deltic as of the merger date and was distributed in order to maintain the company’s qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The special distribution was paid on November 15, 2018, to stockholders of record on September 27, 2018. Common stockholders had the option to elect to receive payment of the special distribution in the form of stock or cash, with the total cash payment to all stockholders limited to no more than 20%, or $44.4
59
million (Cash Amount), of the total distribution. The number of shares distributed was determined based upon common stockholder elections and the volume weighted average price for the company’s common stock over the period from November 12 through November 14 of $36.88. As such, the company issued 4,814,673 shares of its common stock and distributed $44.4 million for the Cash Amount. The special distribution shares are included in basic weighted-average shares outstanding from November 15, 2018, through December 31, 2018, and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding from August 30, 2018, to November 14, 2018. See Note 2: Merger with Deltic for further discussion on the merger. Additionally, on February 14, 2019 the board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.40 per share payable on March 29, 2019 to stockholders of record as of March 8, 2019.
On April 26, 2016 the Company announced that our Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase up to $60.0 million of common stock over a 24-month period. During 2016 we repurchased 169,625 shares at a cost of $6.0 million. No shares were repurchased in 2018 or 2017 under this repurchase plan.
On August 30, 2018, our board of directors authorized management to repurchase up to $100 million of common stock with no time limit set for the repurchase. No shares were repurchased in 2018. We retire shares upon repurchase. Any excess repurchase price over par is recorded in accumulated deficit.
NOTE 5. REVENUE RECOGNITION
The majority of our revenues are derived from the sale of delivered logs, manufactured wood products, residual wood product by-products and real estate. We recognize revenue in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606).
Performance Obligations
A performance obligation, as defined in ASC 606, is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to a customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue at the point in time, or over the period in which the performance obligation is satisfied.
Performance obligations associated with delivered log and residual sales are typically satisfied when the logs and residuals are delivered to our customers’ facilities. Performance obligations associated with the sale of wood products are typically satisfied when the products are shipped (FOB shipping point) or upon delivery to our customer (FOB destination) depending on the terms of the customer contract. Shipping and handling costs for all wood product, log hauling costs and residual sales are accounted for as cost of goods sold.
ASC 606 requires entities to consider significant financing components of contracts with customers but allows for the use of a practical expedient when the period between satisfaction of a performance obligation and payment receipt is one year or less. Given the nature of our revenue transactions, we have elected to utilize this practical expedient. Substantially all of our performance obligations are satisfied as of a point in time. We have also elected to use the practical expedient to not disclose unsatisfied or partially satisfied performance obligations as all unsatisfied contracts are expected to be satisfied in less than one year.
Performance obligations associated with real estate sales are generally satisfied at a point in time when all conditions of closing have been met and title transfers to the buyer. Real estate closings are generally facilitated through an escrow process.
Contract Estimates
The transaction price for log and residual sales is determined using contractual rates applied to delivered volumes. The contractual rates are generally based on prevailing market prices and payment is generally due from customers within one month or less of delivery. For log and residual sales subject to long-term supply agreements, the transaction price is variable but is known at the time of delivery. For wood products sales, the transaction price is generally the amount billed to the customer based on the prevailing market price for the products shipped with consideration for estimated cash discounts.
There are no significant contract estimates related to real estate sales.
60
In general, a customer receivable is recorded as we ship and/or deliver wood products, logs and residuals. We generally receive payment shortly after products have been received by our customers. At December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we recorded $2.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for contract liabilities recorded as deferred revenue related to hunting lease rights. These contract liabilities are being amortized over the term of the contracts, which is typically twelve months or less. Other contract asset and liability balances, such as prepayments, are immaterial. For real estate sales, we typically receive the entire consideration in cash at closing.
Major Products
The following table represents our revenues by major product. December 31, 2017 and 2016 are provided for comparison purposes and were accounted for in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. For additional information regarding our segments, see Note 21: Segment Information.
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Resource |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sawlogs |
$ |
205,977 |
|
|
$ |
190,693 |
|
|
$ |
163,373 |
|
Pulpwood |
|
5,996 |
|
|
|
5,634 |
|
|
|
8,106 |
|
Stumpage |
|
176 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
Other |
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
Total Northern revenues |
|
213,950 |
|
|
|
197,867 |
|
|
|
173,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sawlogs |
|
81,460 |
|
|
|
40,993 |
|
|
|
37,278 |
|
Pulpwood |
|
48,585 |
|
|
|
34,907 |
|
|
|
35,250 |
|
Stumpage |
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
6,245 |
|
Other |
|
8,521 |
|
|
|
3,875 |
|
|
|
4,188 |
|
Total Southern revenues |
|
141,000 |
|
|
|
80,332 |
|
|
|
82,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Resource revenues |
|
354,950 |
|
|
|
278,199 |
|
|
|
256,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wood Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lumber |
|
464,180 |
|
|
|
313,083 |
|
|
|
242,524 |
|
Panels |
|
139,754 |
|
|
|
73,265 |
|
|
|
68,440 |
|
Residuals |
|
76,997 |
|
|
|
54,809 |
|
|
|
56,462 |
|
Total Wood Products revenues |
|
680,931 |
|
|
|
441,157 |
|
|
|
367,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rural real estate |
|
36,024 |
|
|
|
30,655 |
|
|
|
32,491 |
|
Development real estate |
|
12,852 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other |
|
5,690 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Total Real Estate revenues |
|
54,566 |
|
|
|
30,655 |
|
|
|
32,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues |
|
1,090,447 |
|
|
|
750,011 |
|
|
|
656,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment Resource revenues1 |
|
(115,868 |
) |
|
|
(71,416 |
) |
|
|
(57,094 |
) |
Total consolidated revenues |
$ |
974,579 |
|
|
$ |
678,595 |
|
|
$ |
599,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Intersegment revenues represent logs sold by our Resource segment to the Wood Products segment. |
61
Inventories consist of the following at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Logs |
|
$ |
37,303 |
|
|
$ |
29,189 |
|
Lumber, plywood and veneer |
|
|
27,420 |
|
|
|
22,741 |
|
Materials and supplies |
|
|
11,310 |
|
|
|
9,110 |
|
|
|
|
76,033 |
|
|
|
61,040 |
|
Less: LIFO reserve |
|
|
(15,228 |
) |
|
|
(10,908 |
) |
Total inventories |
|
$ |
60,805 |
|
|
$ |
50,132 |
|
If the last-in, first-out inventory had been carried at average cost, the values would have been higher by approximately $15.2 million, $10.9 million and $11.1 million at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
NOTE 7. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, Plant and Equipment consist of the following at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands) |
Range of useful lives |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Land |
|
|
$ |
6,078 |
|
|
$ |
4,707 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
10-40 years |
|
|
92,326 |
|
|
|
55,734 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
2-25 years |
|
|
364,101 |
|
|
|
197,648 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
|
10,190 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
472,695 |
|
|
|
259,437 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
(200,502 |
) |
|
|
(182,208 |
) |
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
$ |
272,193 |
|
|
$ |
77,229 |
|
Depreciation charged against operating income totaled $22.8 million, $8.1 million and $8.3 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Capitalized interest was inconsequential in 2018, 2017 and 2016.
NOTE 8. TIMBER AND TIMBERLANDS
Timber and Timberlands consist of the following at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Timber and timberlands |
|
$ |
1,590,997 |
|
|
$ |
581,648 |
|
Logging roads |
|
|
81,818 |
|
|
|
72,828 |
|
Total timber and timberlands, net |
|
$ |
1,672,815 |
|
|
$ |
654,476 |
|
Depletion from company-owned lands totaled $43.9 million, $17.0 million and $20.8 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization of road costs, such as bridges, culverts and gravel surfacing, totaled $3.4 million, $3.2 million and $3.1 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Future payments due under timber cutting contracts as of December 31, 2018 are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
$ |
8,058 |
|
2020 |
|
|
4,304 |
|
2021 |
|
|
7,001 |
|
2022 |
|
|
377 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
19,740 |
|
62
Indefinite-lived and long-lived intangible assets consist of the following at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets |
|
$ |
10,200 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived intangible assets |
|
|
9,300 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Long-lived intangible assets, net |
|
|
7,628 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
17,828 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for intangibles subject to amortization totaled $0.8 million in 2018 and zero in 2017 and 2016, respectively, and is estimated to be $0.8 million annually for the next five years.
NOTE 10. OTHER ASSETS
Other Assets consist of the following at December 31:
Other Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Real estate held for sale |
|
$ |
10,322 |
|
|
$ |
7,721 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
3,194 |
|
|
|
2,862 |
|
Tax receivables |
|
|
6,659 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Total other current assets |
|
$ |
22,675 |
|
|
$ |
11,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long-term Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Mineral rights |
|
$ |
5,735 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Credit facility issuance costs |
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
2,802 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Investment in company owned life insurance (COLI) |
|
|
3,104 |
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
Deferred real estate development costs |
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
Total other long-term assets |
|
$ |
21,281 |
|
|
$ |
8,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
NOTE 11. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities consist of the following at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Accrued payroll and benefits |
|
$ |
20,130 |
|
|
$ |
18,110 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
12,073 |
|
|
|
9,361 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
8,642 |
|
|
|
6,385 |
|
Avery Landing accrual |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
7,389 |
|
|
|
5,103 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
12,759 |
|
|
|
10,242 |
|
Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
60,993 |
|
|
$ |
55,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt consist of the following at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Term loans |
|
$ |
543,500 |
|
|
$ |
343,500 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Revenue bonds |
|
|
65,735 |
|
|
|
65,735 |
|
Medium-term notes |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
17,250 |
|
Long-term principal |
|
|
762,235 |
|
|
|
576,485 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(373 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(2,143 |
) |
|
|
(2,321 |
) |
Unamortized discounts |
|
|
(4,545 |
) |
|
|
(472 |
) |
Total long-term debt (includes current portion) |
|
|
755,364 |
|
|
|
573,319 |
|
Less current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(39,973 |
) |
|
|
(14,263 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
715,391 |
|
|
$ |
559,056 |
|
Long-term debt excludes $29.0 million of revenue bonds maturing 2027, which have been classified as held for sale. See Note 3: Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale.
TERM LOANS
On March 22, 2018, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement (Amended Term Loan Agreement), which amended the existing term loan agreement dated December 14, 2014. The agreement includes an additional $100.0 million of new loans used to refinance Deltic’s $106.0 million credit facility and a $100.0 million loan assumed in connection with the Deltic merger. The interest coverage ratio and leverage ratio financial covenants remained unchanged (at least 3.00 to 1.00 and no more than 40.0%, respectively). The limitation on timberland acre sales was eliminated. As of December 31, 2018, we were in compliance with all covenants under our debt agreements.
The $100.0 million repayment of Deltic’s credit facility was funded by a $100.0 million borrowing under our revolving credit facility and subsequently refinanced with two tranches of term loans aggregating $100.0 million under the Amended Term Loan Agreement.
Term loans include eleven tranches consisting of the following:
|
• |
one $6.0 million tranche with a rate of 3.70% maturing in 2020; |
|
• |
three $40.0 million tranches maturing each year from 2019 through 2021 at variable rates based on three-month LIBOR plus a spread between 1.65% and 1.90%; |
|
• |
two $40.0 million tranches with rates of 4.29% maturing in 2022 and 4.49% maturing in 2023; |
|
• |
one tranche of $110.0 million with a rate of 4.64% maturing in 2024; |
|
• |
one tranche of $27.5 million at a variable rate based on three-month LIBOR plus 2.15% maturing in 2026; |
64
|
• |
one tranche of $65.0 million at a variable rate based on one-month LIBOR plus 1.95% maturing in 2028; and |
|
• |
one tranche of $35.0 million at a variable rate based on one-month LIBOR plus 1.95% maturing in 2028. |
Term loan variable rates were 2.40% and 2.30% for three-month and one-month LIBOR, respectively, during the fourth quarter of 2018.
SENIOR NOTES
In 2009, we sold $150.0 million aggregate principal of 7.50% senior notes (Senior Notes) due in 2019. The terms of these Senior Notes limited our ability and the ability of any subsidiary guarantors, to borrow money, pay dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock, enter into sale and leaseback transactions and create liens.
In January 2019, we refinanced the Senior Notes with a $150.0 million term loan that will mature in 2029. The new term loan carries a variable interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 1.85%. Concurrently, we entered into an interest rate swap to fix the rate at 4.56%. Upon the refinancing, we redeemed and paid all outstanding Senior Notes, including a redemption premium of $4.9 million, and paid $0.5 million of lender fees on the new term loan. Subsequent to the refinancing, $693.5 million was outstanding under the Amended Term Loan Agreement.
MEDIUM-TERM NOTES AND REVENUE BONDS
We repaid $14.3 million of our medium-term notes in the first quarter of 2018. The remaining $3.0 million of medium-term notes have a fixed rate of 8.75% and mature in 2022.
Revenue bonds of $65.7 million have a fixed rate of 2.75% and mature in 2024.
We assumed the obligations relating to the letter of credit supporting Deltic’s $29.0 million Union County, Arkansas Taxable Industrial Revenue Bonds 1998 Series due October 1, 2027 associated with the MDF facility. Neither the State of Arkansas nor Union County, Arkansas has any liability under the bonds. Contemporaneously with the issuance of the bonds, Deltic’s subsidiary (Del-Tin) and Union County entered into an agreement that obligated Del-Tin to make payments in an amount necessary to fund the debt service on the bonds. Under the terms of the agreement, a standby letter of credit to benefit the holders of the bonds is required. The irrevocable standby letter of credit was amended and re-issued on February 20, 2018, in the amount of $29.7 million, expiring April 13, 2023. These bonds bear interest at a variable rate determined weekly by the remarketing agent. Interest is payable monthly. The bonds have been classified as held for sale as part of the sale of the MDF facility and are excluded from long-term debt. Additionally, the letter of credit will be terminated in connection with the sale of the MDF facility. See Note 3: Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale.
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS AND UNAMORTIZED DISCOUNTS
Debt issuance costs represent the capitalized direct costs incurred related to the issuance of debt. These costs are amortized to interest expense over the terms of the respective borrowings.
Unamortized discounts include a $4.9 million fair value adjustment to the $100.0 million term loan assumed in the Deltic merger. The unamortized balance at December 31, 2018, is $4.3 million and will be amortized through the term loan’s maturity in 2025.
65
Scheduled principal payments due on long-term debt as of December 31, 2018 are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
2020 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
2021 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
2022 |
|
|
43,000 |
|
2023 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
553,235 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
762,235 |
|
Debt maturities reflect the January 2019 refinancing of our $150.0 million senior notes maturing 2029, and exclude $29.0 million of revenue bonds maturing 2027, which have been classified as held for sale. See Note 3: Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale.
CREDIT AGREEMENT
On February 14, 2018, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Amended Credit Agreement) with an expiration date of April 13, 2023. The Amended Credit Agreement increased our revolving line of credit to $380.0 million, which may be increased by up to an additional $420.0 million. It also includes a sublimit of $75.0 million for the issuance of standby letters of credit and a sublimit of $25.0 million for swing line loans. Usage under either or both subfacilities reduces availability under the revolving line of credit.
We may also utilize borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement to, among other things, refinance existing indebtedness and provide funding for working capital requirements, capital projects, acquisitions and other general corporate expenditures.
Pricing is set according to the type of borrowing. LIBOR Loans are issued at a rate equal to the LIBOR Rate, while Base Rate Loans are issued at a rate equal to the Base Rate, which is a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 1/2 of 1.00%, (b) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time by KeyBank as its prime rate and (c) the sum of the LIBOR that would apply to a one month Interest Period plus 1.00%. The interest rates we pay for borrowings under either type of loan include an additional Applicable Rate, which can range from 0.875% to 1.70% for LIBOR loans and from 0% to 0.70% for Base Rate loans, depending on our current credit rating. As of December 31, 2018, we were able to borrow under the bank credit facility with an additional Applicable Rate of 1.30% for LIBOR Loans and 0.30% for Base Rate Loans, with facility fees of 0.20% on the $380.0 million of the bank credit facility.
The Amended Credit Agreement contains certain covenants that limit our ability and that of our subsidiaries to create liens, merge or consolidate, dispose of assets, incur indebtedness and guarantees, repurchase or redeem capital stock and indebtedness, make certain investments or acquisitions, enter into certain transactions with affiliates or change the nature of our business. The Amended Credit Agreement also contains financial maintenance covenants including the maintenance of a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio consistent with the Amended Term Loan Agreement. We will be permitted to pay dividends to our stockholders under the terms of the Amended Credit Agreement so long as we expect to remain in compliance with the financial maintenance covenants. At December 31, 2018, we were in compliance with all covenants under our credit agreements, there were no borrowings under the revolving line of credit and approximately $1.0 million of the $380 million credit facility was utilized by outstanding letters of credit.
66
NOTE 13. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
From time to time, we enter into derivative financial instruments to manage certain cash flow and fair value risks.
Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset or liability to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Our fair value interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $14.3 million matured during the first quarter of 2018. A $50.0 million notional fair value swap associated with our senior notes was terminated in December 2017 at a cost of $0.4 million. The termination cost has been recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of our long-term debt. The unamortized balance of approximately $0.2 million will be expensed in 2019.
Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in the cash flows of a specific asset or liability that is attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered cash flow hedges. As of December 31, 2018, we have four interest rate swaps associated with $207.5 million of term loan debt. The cash flow hedges convert variable rates ranging from three-month and one-month LIBOR plus 1.90% to 2.15%, to fixed rates ranging from 3.88% to 4.82%. Our cash flow hedges are expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting cash flows attributable to the hedged interest rate risk through the term of the hedge. As of December 31, 2018, the amount of net losses expected to be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months is approximately $0.2 million.
In January 2019, we entered into a $150.0 million interest rate swap associated with the refinance of our Senior Notes. This cash flow hedge converted a variable rate of one-month LIBOR plus 1.85% to a fixed rate of 4.56%.
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage our exposure to interest rate movements, commodity price movements or other identified risks, but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly into income. In April 2017, we entered into a lumber price swap to fix the price on a total of 36 million board feet (MMBF) of southern yellow pine. The lumber price swap expired on December 31, 2017, resulting in a realized gain of $1.1 million for the year then ended.
The fair values of our cash flow and fair value derivative instruments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Location |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
Location |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||
Derivatives designated in fair value hedging relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest rate contracts |
|
Other assets, current |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
Other assets, non-current |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated in cash flow hedging relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest rate contracts |
|
Other assets, non-current |
|
$ |
1,510 |
|
|
$ |
1,156 |
|
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
$ |
2,888 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
The following table details the effect of derivatives on our Consolidated Statements of Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Location |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Derivatives designated in fair value hedging relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain (loss) on interest rate contracts1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(191 |
) |
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated in cash flow hedging relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
$ |
(3,062 |
) |
|
$ |
(145 |
) |
|
$ |
916 |
|
Loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(647 |
) |
|
$ |
(149 |
) |
|
$ |
(215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Lumber price contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain on lumber price swap |
|
Gain on lumber price swap |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
1,088 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
$ |
35,227 |
|
|
$ |
27,049 |
|
|
$ |
28,941 |
|
NOTE 14. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
A framework has been established for measuring fair value, which provides a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
|
• |
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
|
• |
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include: |
|
• |
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; |
|
• |
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; |
|
• |
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and |
|
• |
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
|
• |
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. |
If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the Level 2 input must correspond to substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
The fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
|
• |
For cash, cash-equivalents and restricted cash, the carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. |
68
|
• |
The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated based upon the quoted market prices for the same or similar debt issues or estimated based on average market prices for comparable debt when there is no quoted market price. |
|
• |
The cash surrender value of our company owned life insurance, the amount at which it could be redeemed, is used to estimate fair value because market prices are not readily available. |
Estimated fair values of our financial instruments as of December 31 are as follows:
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (Level 1) |
|
$ |
79,441 |
|
|
$ |
79,441 |
|
|
$ |
120,457 |
|
|
$ |
120,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets related to interest rate swaps (Level 2) |
|
$ |
1,510 |
|
|
$ |
1,510 |
|
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
Derivative liabilities related to interest rate swaps (Level 2) |
|
$ |
(2,888 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,888 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion (Level 2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loans |
|
$ |
(539,169 |
) |
|
$ |
(539,037 |
) |
|
$ |
(343,500 |
) |
|
$ |
(345,222 |
) |
Senior notes |
|
|
(149,786 |
) |
|
|
(154,328 |
) |
|
|
(149,528 |
) |
|
|
(161,063 |
) |
Revenue bonds |
|
|
(94,735 |
) |
|
|
(93,144 |
) |
|
|
(65,735 |
) |
|
|
(63,967 |
) |
Medium-term notes |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,419 |
) |
|
|
(17,250 |
) |
|
|
(18,227 |
) |
Total long-term debt1 |
|
$ |
(786,690 |
) |
|
$ |
(789,928 |
) |
|
$ |
(576,013 |
) |
|
$ |
(588,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company owned life insurance (COLI) (Level 3) |
|
$ |
3,104 |
|
|
$ |
3,104 |
|
|
$ |
1,996 |
|
|
$ |
1,996 |
|
1 |
The carrying amount of long-term debt includes principal and unamortized discounts. Long-term debt also includes the $29.0 million of revenue bonds for the MDF facility which are classified as held for sale at December 31, 2018. See Note 3 Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale for further information. |
NOTE 15. SAVINGS PLANS, PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
SAVINGS PLANS
Substantially all of our employees are eligible to participate in 401(k) savings plans. In 2018, 2017 and 2016, we made matching 401(k) contributions on behalf of our employees of $3.7 million, $2.4 million and $2.1 million, respectively.
Certain eligible employees who earn awards under our annual incentive plan are permitted to defer receipt of those awards. These employees may defer receipt of a minimum of 50% and a maximum of 100% of the award pursuant to rules established under our Management Deferred Compensation Plan. Eligible employees may also defer up to 50% of their base salary under the Management Deferred Compensation Plan. At the employee's election, deferrals may be deemed invested in a company stock unit account, a directed investment account with certain deemed investments available under the 401(k) Plan or a combination of these investment vehicles. If company stock units are elected, dividend equivalents are credited to the units.
Upon our merger with Deltic, we assumed three defined 401(k) savings plans.
PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
On January 1, 2011, we froze our pension plans to any new salaried and hourly non-represented employees hired after that date.
Effective January 1, 2010, we restructured our other postretirement benefit plans (OPEB). The level of health care subsidy was frozen for retirees so that all future increments in health care costs will be borne by the retirees. In
69
addition, for retirees under age 65, a high deductible medical plan was created and all other existing health care plans were terminated. For retirees age 65 or over, the medical plan is divided into two components, with the company continuing to self-insure prescription drugs and providing a fully-insured medical supplemental plan through AARP/United Healthcare. Both health care plans require the retiree to contribute amounts in excess of the company subsidy in order to continue coverage. The Plan does not pay for vision, dental and life insurance for the retirees. The effect of these retiree plan changes was a reduction in the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation of $76.7 million, which was recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss as of December 31, 2009 and will be amortized through 2019.
We use a December 31 measurement date for our benefit plans and obligations. We recognize the underfunded status of our defined benefit pension plans and OPEB obligations on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize changes in the funded status in the year in which changes occur through accumulated other comprehensive income and amortize actuarial gains and losses through the Consolidated Statements of Income as net periodic cost (benefit).
Upon merger with Deltic, we assumed one qualified pension plan, one nonqualified pension plans and a postretirement plan. The acquired plans have been frozen to new participants since 2014. Consistent with accounting for the merger as the acquirer in a business combination, pension assets acquired, and benefit obligations assumed were remeasured to reflect their funded status at the date of acquisition. This included updating asset values and discount rates to reflect market conditions at the merger date. The fair value of these items at the date of merger are listed in the table below as “plan acquisitions”.
The change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets and funded status for company-sponsored benefit plans and obligations are as follows:
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
$ |
(392,371 |
) |
|
$ |
(385,461 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,349 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,337 |
) |
Service cost |
|
|
(8,454 |
) |
|
|
(6,753 |
) |
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Interest cost |
|
|
(16,992 |
) |
|
|
(16,096 |
) |
|
|
(1,482 |
) |
|
|
(1,262 |
) |
Actuarial gain (loss) |
|
|
20,445 |
|
|
|
(15,876 |
) |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
31,530 |
|
|
|
31,815 |
|
|
|
3,582 |
|
|
|
3,793 |
|
Plan acquisitions |
|
|
(62,067 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(13,542 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Benefit obligation at end of year |
|
$ |
(427,909 |
) |
|
$ |
(392,371 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,032 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
|
$ |
313,862 |
|
|
$ |
289,675 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Actual (loss) return on plan assets |
|
|
(23,745 |
) |
|
|
49,158 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Employer contributions and benefit payments |
|
|
53,998 |
|
|
|
6,844 |
|
|
|
3,582 |
|
|
|
3,794 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(31,530 |
) |
|
|
(31,815 |
) |
|
|
(3,582 |
) |
|
|
(3,794 |
) |
Plan acquisitions |
|
|
38,700 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
|
$ |
351,285 |
|
|
$ |
313,862 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
(2,121 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,629 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,876 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,705 |
) |
Noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(74,503 |
) |
|
|
(76,880 |
) |
|
|
(36,156 |
) |
|
|
(26,644 |
) |
Funded status |
|
$ |
(76,624 |
) |
|
$ |
(78,509 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,032 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,349 |
) |
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans is determined using the actuarial present value of the vested benefits to which the employee is currently entitled and the employee’s expected date of separation for retirement and was $417.4 million and $389.6 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
During 2018 we made qualified pension benefit contributions of $52.1 million, including a $44.0 million voluntary contribution allowing us to deduct the amount on our 2017 income tax return at higher tax rates. We made cash contributions of $5.3 million to our qualified pension benefit plans during 2017.
70
We utilize formal investment policy guidelines for our company-sponsored pension plan assets. Management is responsible for ensuring the investment policy and guidelines are adhered to and the investment objectives are met.
The general policy states that plan assets will be invested to seek the greatest return consistent with the fiduciary character of the pension funds and to allow the plans to meet the need for timely pension benefit payments. The specific investment guidelines stipulate that management will maintain adequate liquidity for meeting expected benefit payments by reviewing, on a timely basis, contribution and benefit payment levels and appropriately revise long-term and short-term asset allocations. Management takes reasonable and prudent steps to preserve the value of pension fund assets and to avoid the risk of large losses. Major steps taken to provide this protection include the following:
|
• |
Assets are diversified among various asset classes, such as domestic equities, global equities, fixed income, convertible securities and liquid reserves. The long-term asset allocation ranges are as follows: |
Domestic and international equities |
24% |
- |
48% |
Fixed income securities |
38% |
- |
58% |
Alternatives, which may include equities and fixed income securities |
12% |
- |
18% |
Cash and cash equivalents |
0% |
- |
5% |
|
• |
Periodic reviews of allocations within these ranges are made to determine what adjustments should be made based on changing economic and market conditions and specific liquidity requirements. |
|
• |
Assets are managed by professional investment managers and may be invested in separately managed accounts or commingled funds. Assets are diversified by selecting different investment managers for each asset class and by limiting assets under each manager to no more than 25% of the total pension fund. |
|
• |
Assets are not invested in PotlatchDeltic stock. |
The investment guidelines also provide that the individual investment managers are expected to achieve a reasonable rate of return over a market cycle. Emphasis will be placed on long-term performance versus short-term market aberrations. Factors to be considered in determining reasonable rates of return include performance achieved by a diverse cross section of other investment managers, performance of commonly used benchmarks (e.g., Russell 2500 Index, Barclays Long Credit Index, Morgan Stanley Capital International Index), actuarial assumptions for return on plan investments and specific performance guidelines given to individual investment managers.
The asset allocations of the pension benefit plans’ assets at December 31 by asset category are as follows:
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
|||||
Asset Category |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
Domestic and international equities |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
Fixed income securities |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Other (includes cash and cash equivalents and alternatives) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
The pension assets are stated at fair value. Refer to Note 14: Financial Instruments for a discussion of the framework used to measure fair value.
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for pension assets measured at fair value:
|
• |
Level 1 assets include cash and cash equivalents, corporate common and preferred stocks with quoted market prices on major securities markets, and investments in registered investment company funds for which market quotations are generally readily available on the primary market or exchange on which they are traded. |
|
• |
Level 2 assets consist primarily of collective investment trust funds, which are valued at their respective net asset value (NAV) and fully redeemable in the near-term. The NAV fair value practical expedient was not used as these investments have readily determinable fair value. |
71
|
• |
Investments in funds that may not be fully redeemed in the near-term are generally classified in Level 3. We had no Level 3 investments at December 31, 2018 or 2017. |
Fair value measurements are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2018 |
|
|||||||||
Asset Category |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,120 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
4,120 |
|
Domestic equity securities1 |
|
|
31,315 |
|
|
|
23,384 |
|
|
|
54,699 |
|
International equity securities2 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,848 |
|
|
|
21,848 |
|
Emerging markets3 |
|
|
6,909 |
|
|
|
21,225 |
|
|
|
28,134 |
|
Fixed income securities4 |
|
|
204,072 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
204,072 |
|
Alternatives5 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
38,412 |
|
|
|
38,412 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
246,416 |
|
|
$ |
104,869 |
|
|
$ |
351,285 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2017 |
|
|||||||||
Asset Category |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,004 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
3,004 |
|
Domestic equity securities1 |
|
|
29,178 |
|
|
|
28,382 |
|
|
|
57,560 |
|
International equity securities2 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
28,413 |
|
|
|
28,413 |
|
Emerging markets3 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
29,245 |
|
|
|
29,257 |
|
Fixed income securities4 |
|
|
148,833 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
148,833 |
|
Alternatives5 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
46,795 |
|
|
|
46,795 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
181,027 |
|
|
$ |
132,835 |
|
|
$ |
313,862 |
|
1 |
Level 1 assets are managed investments in U.S. small/mid-cap equities that track the Russell 2500 Growth index or Russell 2500 Value index. Level 2 assets are collective investments, which are invested in U.S. large-cap equities that track the S&P 500. |
2 |
Level 2 assets are collective investments in equity funds of developed markets outside of the United States and Canada that track the MSCI EAFE Value index or MSCI EAFE Growth index. |
3 |
Level 1 assets are mutual funds which are invested in the common stock of companies located (or with primary operations) in emerging markets that track the MSCI Emerging Markets index. Level 2 assets are collective investments in the common stock of companies located (or with primary operations) in emerging markets that track the MSCI Emerging Markets index. |
4 |
Level 1 assets are mutual funds and investments in a diversified portfolio of fixed income instruments of varying maturities representing corporates, sovereign debt, U.S. treasuries and municipals that track the Bloomberg Barclay's Long-term Credit index. |
PLAN ACTIVITY
Pre-tax components of net periodic cost (benefit) recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Income were as follows:
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
8,454 |
|
|
$ |
6,753 |
|
|
$ |
6,508 |
|
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
16,992 |
|
|
|
16,096 |
|
|
|
17,020 |
|
|
|
1,482 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(20,035 |
) |
|
|
(18,406 |
) |
|
|
(18,999 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
(8,877 |
) |
|
|
(8,877 |
) |
|
|
(8,877 |
) |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
16,589 |
|
|
|
14,484 |
|
|
|
16,339 |
|
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
1,717 |
|
Net periodic cost (benefit) |
|
$ |
22,186 |
|
|
$ |
19,215 |
|
|
$ |
21,386 |
|
|
$ |
(5,743 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,064 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,725 |
) |
72
Other amounts recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income were as follows:
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
Net amount at beginning of year |
|
$ |
100,611 |
|
|
$ |
120,627 |
|
|
$ |
128,244 |
|
|
$ |
(5,055 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,182 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,741 |
) |
Amounts arising during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (gain) |
|
|
23,335 |
|
|
|
(14,874 |
) |
|
|
4,370 |
|
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
313 |
|
Taxes |
|
|
(6,067 |
) |
|
|
3,869 |
|
|
|
(1,704 |
) |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
Net amount arising during the period |
|
|
17,268 |
|
|
|
(11,005 |
) |
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
(1,554 |
) |
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts reclassified during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
8,877 |
|
|
|
8,877 |
|
|
|
8,877 |
|
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
(16,589 |
) |
|
|
(14,484 |
) |
|
|
(16,339 |
) |
|
|
(1,311 |
) |
|
|
(1,537 |
) |
|
|
(1,717 |
) |
Taxes |
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
6,574 |
|
|
|
(1,967 |
) |
|
|
(2,863 |
) |
|
|
(2,792 |
) |
Reclassification of certain tax effects due to tax law changes1 |
|
|
23,787 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net reclassifications during the period |
|
|
11,374 |
|
|
|
(9,011 |
) |
|
|
(10,283 |
) |
|
|
5,227 |
|
|
|
4,477 |
|
|
|
4,368 |
|
Net amount at end of year |
|
$ |
129,253 |
|
|
$ |
100,611 |
|
|
$ |
120,627 |
|
|
$ |
(1,382 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,055 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
During 2018 we reclassified certain tax effects of tax law changes from accumulated other comprehensive loss to accumulated deficit on our Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with ASU 2018-02. See Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. |
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, net of tax, consist of:
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Net loss |
|
$ |
128,849 |
|
|
$ |
100,070 |
|
|
$ |
7,269 |
|
|
$ |
10,165 |
|
Prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
(8,651 |
) |
|
|
(15,220 |
) |
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
129,253 |
|
|
$ |
100,611 |
|
|
$ |
(1,382 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,055 |
) |
The estimated net loss and prior service cost for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next year are $13.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The estimated net loss and prior service credit for OPEB obligations that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit over the next year are $1.2 million and $8.8 million, respectively.
EXPECTED FUNDING AND BENEFIT PAYMENTS
We are not required to contribute to our qualified pension plans in 2019. Our non-qualified pension plan and other postretirement employee benefit plans are unfunded and benefit payments are paid from our general assets. We estimate that we will make non-qualified pension plan payments of $2.1 million and other postretirement employee benefit payments of $3.9 million in 2019, which are included below.
Estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service are as follows for the years indicated:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pension Plans |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||
2019 |
|
$ |
30,496 |
|
|
$ |
3,876 |
|
2020 |
|
$ |
30,464 |
|
|
$ |
3,727 |
|
2021 |
|
$ |
30,548 |
|
|
$ |
3,502 |
|
2022 |
|
$ |
30,451 |
|
|
$ |
3,349 |
|
2023 |
|
$ |
30,346 |
|
|
$ |
3,175 |
|
2024–2028 |
|
$ |
144,685 |
|
|
$ |
12,984 |
|
73
The weighted average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation for non-Deltic plans as of December 31 were:
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
Rate of salaried compensation increase |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
The weighted average assumptions used for non-Deltic plans to determine the net periodic cost (benefit) for the years ended December 31 were:
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Rate of salaried compensation increase |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
The weighted average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation for Deltic plans as of December 31, 2018 were:
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
Rate of salaried compensation increase |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
The weighted average assumptions used for Deltic plans to determine the net periodic cost (benefit) for the years ended December 31 were:
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
|
OPEB |
|
||
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
Rate of salaried compensation increase |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
The discount rate used in the determination of pension and other postretirement employee benefit obligations was calculated using hypothetical bond portfolios to match the expected benefit payments under each of our pension plans and other postretirement employee benefit obligations based on bonds available at each year-end with a rating of "AA" or better. The portfolios were well-diversified over corporate industrial, corporate financial, municipal, federal and foreign government issuers.
The expected return on plan assets assumption is based upon an analysis of historical long-term returns for various investment categories, as measured by appropriate indices. These indices are weighted based upon the extent to which plan assets are invested in the particular categories in arriving at our determination of a composite expected return. The expected rate of return assumption on all plans that will be used to determine net periodic cost for 2019 is 6.25%.
A decrease in the discount rate or the rate of expected return on plan assets, all other assumptions remaining the same, would increase net periodic cost. A 25 basis point decrease in the pension discount rate would increase net periodic cost by approximately $0.7 million in 2018 and increase the projected benefit obligation by approximately $11.6 million as of December 31, 2018. A 25 basis point decrease in the assumption for the expected return on plan assets would increase net periodic cost by approximately $0.9 million in 2018. The actual rates of return on plan assets may, and do, vary significantly from the assumption used. A 25 basis point decrease in the OPEB discount rate would be de minimis to the annual net periodic cost.
The assumed health care cost trend rate used to calculate other postretirement employee benefit obligations for non-Deltic plans and Deltic plans as of December 31, 2018 was 7.95% and 7.56%, respectively, for a certain group of participants under age 65 in our hourly plan and our Arkansas participants covered by a collective bargaining agreement, grading ratably to an assumption of 4.50% in 2038. The actual rates of health care cost
74
increases may vary significantly from the assumption used because of unanticipated changes in health care costs.
A one percentage point change in the health care cost trend rates would have the following effects on our December 31, 2018 Consolidated Financial Statements:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
1% Increase |
|
|
1% Decrease |
|
||
Effect on total service cost plus interest cost |
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
(119 |
) |
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation |
|
$ |
2,021 |
|
|
$ |
(1,584 |
) |
NOTE 16. COMPONENTS OF ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The following tables detail the changes in our accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, net of tax.
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Gains and losses on cash flow hedging |
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
|
OPEB |
|
|
Total |
|
||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
|
$ |
(705 |
) |
|
$ |
100,611 |
|
|
$ |
(5,055 |
) |
|
$ |
94,851 |
|
Amounts arising during the period |
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
17,268 |
|
|
|
(1,554 |
) |
|
|
18,776 |
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCL to earnings |
|
|
(647 |
) |
|
|
(12,413 |
) |
|
|
5,599 |
|
|
|
(7,461 |
) |
Amounts reclassified from AOCL to accumulated deficit |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
23,787 |
|
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
23,265 |
|
Net change |
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
28,642 |
|
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
|
34,580 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2018 |
|
$ |
1,560 |
|
|
$ |
129,253 |
|
|
$ |
(1,382 |
) |
|
$ |
129,431 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Gains and losses on cash flow hedging |
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
|
OPEB |
|
|
Total |
|
||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
|
$ |
(701 |
) |
|
$ |
120,627 |
|
|
$ |
(9,182 |
) |
|
$ |
110,744 |
|
Amounts arising during the period |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
(11,005 |
) |
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
(11,210 |
) |
Amounts reclassified from AOCL to earnings |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(9,011 |
) |
|
|
4,477 |
|
|
|
(4,683 |
) |
Net change |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(20,016 |
) |
|
|
4,127 |
|
|
|
(15,893 |
) |
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
|
$ |
(705 |
) |
|
$ |
100,611 |
|
|
$ |
(5,055 |
) |
|
$ |
94,851 |
|
Amounts in parenthesis indicate credits.
See Note 13: Derivative Instruments and Note 15: Savings Plans, Pension and Other Postretirement Employee Benefits for additional information.
NOTE 17. EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
As of December 31, 2018, we had two stock incentive plans under which performance stock awards (PSAs), restricted stock units (RSUs) and deferred compensation stock equivalent units were outstanding. All of these plans have received shareholder approval. We were originally authorized to issue up to 1.6 million shares and 1.0 million shares under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, respectively. At December 31, 2018, approximately 0.3 million shares were authorized for future awards. We issue new shares of common stock to settle PSAs, RSUs and deferred compensation stock equivalent units. We estimate forfeitures each period.
75
The following table details our compensation expense and the related income tax benefit as of December 31:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Employee equity-based compensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance stock awards |
|
$ |
4,157 |
|
|
$ |
3,582 |
|
|
$ |
3,437 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
Accelerated share-based termination benefits in connection with the merger |
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total employee equity-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
7,993 |
|
|
$ |
4,722 |
|
|
$ |
4,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation stock equivalent units expense |
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
$ |
657 |
|
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax benefit recognized for shared-based payment awards |
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
379 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
PERFORMANCE STOCK AWARDS
PSAs granted under the stock incentive plans have a three-year performance period and shares are issued at the end of the period if the performance measures are met. The performance measures are based on the percentile ranking of our total shareholder return relative to the total shareholder return performance of both a selected peer group of companies and a larger group of indexed companies over the three-year performance period. The number of shares actually issued, as a percentage of the amount subject to the PSA, could range from 0% to 200%. PSAs granted under our stock incentive plans do not have voting rights unless and until shares are issued upon settlement. If shares are issued at the end of the three-year performance measurement period, the recipients will receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional shares at the time of payment equal to the dividends that would have been paid on the shares earned had the recipients owned the shares during the three-year period. Therefore, the shares are not considered participating securities.
A Monte Carlo simulation method is used to estimate the stock prices of PotlatchDeltic and the selected peer companies at the end of the three-year performance period. The expected volatility of each company’s stock price and covariance of returns among the peer companies are key assumptions within the Monte Carlo simulation. Historical volatility over a term similar to the performance period is considered a reasonable proxy for forecasted volatility. Likewise, because the returns of PotlatchDeltic and the peer group companies are correlated, the covariance, a measure of how two variables tend to move together, is calculated over a historical term similar to the performance period and applied in the simulations. The simulations use the stock prices of PotlatchDeltic and the peer group of companies as of the award date as a starting point. Multiple simulations are generated, resulting in share prices and total shareholder return values for PotlatchDeltic and the peer group of companies. For each simulation, the total shareholder return of PotlatchDeltic is ranked against that of the peer group of companies. The future value of the performance share unit is calculated based on a multiplier for the percentile ranking and then discounted to present value. The discount rate is the risk-free rate as of the award date for a term consistent with the performance period. Awards are also credited with dividend equivalents at the end of the performance period, and as a result, award values are not adjusted for dividends.
The following table presents the key inputs used in calculating the fair value of the PSAs in 2018, 2017 and 2016, and the resulting fair values:
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Stock price as of valuation date |
|
$ |
54.00 |
|
|
$ |
43.60 |
|
|
$ |
25.92 |
|
Risk-free rate |
|
|
2.46 |
% |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
23.74 |
% |
|
|
24.22 |
% |
|
|
23.82 |
% |
Expected dividends |
|
|
2.96 |
% |
|
|
3.44 |
% |
|
|
5.79 |
% |
Expected term (years) |
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
Fair value of a performance share |
|
$ |
75.37 |
|
|
$ |
53.85 |
|
|
$ |
30.02 |
|
76
The following table summarizes outstanding PSAs as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and the changes during those years:
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
||||||
Nonvested shares outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
200,631 |
|
|
$ |
39.19 |
|
|
|
203,788 |
|
|
$ |
32.59 |
|
|
|
161,049 |
|
|
$ |
41.26 |
|
Granted |
|
|
67,747 |
|
|
$ |
75.37 |
|
|
|
78,033 |
|
|
$ |
53.85 |
|
|
|
125,469 |
|
|
$ |
30.02 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(121,058 |
) |
|
$ |
30.02 |
|
|
|
(78,129 |
) |
|
$ |
36.71 |
|
|
|
(82,730 |
) |
|
$ |
45.57 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(5,082 |
) |
|
$ |
47.90 |
|
|
|
(3,061 |
) |
|
$ |
34.68 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Nonvested shares outstanding at December 31 |
|
|
142,238 |
|
|
$ |
63.91 |
|
|
|
200,631 |
|
|
$ |
39.19 |
|
|
|
203,788 |
|
|
$ |
32.59 |
|
Total grant date fair value of share awards vested during the year |
|
$ |
3,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of share awards vested during the year |
|
$ |
6,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of nonvested share awards at December 31 |
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2018, there was $4.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested PSAs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years.
RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
During 2018, 2017 and 2016, certain directors, officers, and other employees of the company were granted RSU awards that will accrue dividend equivalents based on dividends paid during the RSU vesting period. The dividend equivalents will be converted into additional RSUs that will vest in the same manner as the underlying RSUs to which they relate. Therefore, the shares are not considered participating securities. The terms of the awards state that the RSUs will vest in a given time period of one to three years and the terms of certain awards follow a vesting schedule within the given time period.
The following table summarizes outstanding RSU awards as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and the changes during those years:
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
||||||
Unvested shares outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
67,871 |
|
|
$ |
32.87 |
|
|
|
71,420 |
|
|
$ |
31.61 |
|
|
|
44,531 |
|
|
$ |
40.95 |
|
Granted |
|
|
49,193 |
|
|
$ |
49.96 |
|
|
|
26,507 |
|
|
$ |
43.64 |
|
|
|
43,320 |
|
|
$ |
26.08 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(41,350 |
) |
|
$ |
26.33 |
|
|
|
(29,039 |
) |
|
$ |
39.65 |
|
|
|
(16,431 |
) |
|
$ |
39.92 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(3,694 |
) |
|
$ |
45.36 |
|
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
$ |
31.63 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Unvested shares outstanding at December 31 |
|
|
72,020 |
|
|
$ |
47.66 |
|
|
|
67,871 |
|
|
$ |
32.87 |
|
|
|
71,420 |
|
|
$ |
31.61 |
|
Total grant date fair value of RSU awards vested during the year |
|
$ |
1,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
656 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of RSU awards vested during the year |
|
$ |
1,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of unvested RSU awards at December 31 |
|
$ |
2,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2018, there was $1.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSU awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.2 years.
77
DEFERRED COMPENSATION STOCK EQUIVALENT UNITS
A long-term incentive award was granted annually to our directors through December 2017. The awards are payable upon a director's separation from service. Directors may also elect to defer their annual retainers, payable in the form of stock. All stock unit equivalent accounts are credited with dividend equivalents. As of December 31, 2018, there were 163,039 shares outstanding that will be distributed in the future to directors as common stock.
Issuance of restricted stock units awarded to certain directors, officers and employees may also be deferred. All stock unit equivalent accounts are credited with dividend equivalents. As of December 31, 2018, there were 83,232 RSUs which had vested, but issuance of the related stock had been deferred.
REPLACEMENT RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS
The replacement RSUs issued as a result of the merger with Deltic have four-year vesting terms. During the vesting period, the grantee may vote and receive dividends on the shares, but the shares are subject to transfer restrictions and are all, or partially, forfeited if a grantee terminates employment. Expense for replacement RSUs will continue to be recognized over the remaining service period unless a qualifying termination occurs. A qualifying termination of an awardee will result in acceleration of vesting and expense recognition in the period that the qualifying termination occurs. Qualifying terminations during 2018 resulted in accelerated vesting of approximately 35,000 replacement RSUs and recognition of $1.8 million of expense. This accelerated expense recognition is included in merger-related integration costs as described in Note 18: Merger, Integration and Other Costs.
NOTE 18. MERGER, INTEGRATION AND OTHER COSTS
In connection with the Deltic merger, we incurred costs such as advisory, legal, accounting, valuation and other professional or consulting fees. Restructuring costs relate to termination benefits and integration costs to combine business processes and locations.
Merger, integration and other costs for 2018 and 2017 are summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
||
Merger costs |
|
$ |
12,165 |
|
$ |
3,290 |
|
Restructuring costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination benefits |
|
|
8,709 |
|
|
— |
|
Professional services |
|
|
850 |
|
|
110 |
|
Other |
|
|
395 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
9,954 |
|
|
119 |
|
Total merger and restructuring costs |
|
$ |
22,119 |
|
$ |
3,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2018, we incurred termination benefits, which included accelerated share-based payment costs, for qualifying terminations. Employee termination benefits considered postemployment benefits are accrued when the obligation is probable and estimable, such as benefits stipulated by human resource policies. If the employee must provide future service greater than 60 days, such benefits are expensed ratably over the future service period. Accrued termination benefits are recorded in accrued payroll and benefits within accounts payable and accrued liabilities as detailed in Note 11: Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities. Accrued termination benefits at December 31, 2018 are expected to be paid within one year.
In addition, we entered into a two-year consulting agreement for $1.85 million with Deltic’s former Chief Executive Officer. While the agreement was terminated in the first quarter of 2018, payments are required to be made through the end of the two-year term. This agreement was considered a separate transaction from the business combination, therefore the $1.85 million was recorded as merger costs in the first quarter of 2018.
78
Changes in accrued severance related to restructuring were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
Accrued severance as of December 31, 2017 |
$ |
— |
|
Charges |
|
8,709 |
|
Payments |
|
(8,361 |
) |
Accrued severance as of December 31, 2018 |
$ |
348 |
|
NOTE 19. INCOME TAXES
As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes on income from investments in real estate that we distribute to our shareholders. We conduct certain activities through our PotlatchDeltic TRS which are subject to corporate level federal and state income taxes. These activities are principally comprised of our wood products manufacturing operations and certain real estate investments. Therefore, income tax expense or benefit is primarily due to income or loss of the PotlatchDelticTRS, as well as permanent book versus tax differences.
Deltic’s REIT qualifying activities were also not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes commencing on the date of the merger. We are, however, subject to corporate taxes on built-in gains (the excess of fair market value over tax basis on the merger date) on sales of former Deltic real property held by the REIT during the five years following the Deltic merger. The sale of standing timber is not subject to built-in gains tax.
On December 22, 2017, H.R. 1, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act) was enacted. The Act contained significant changes to corporate taxation, including the reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. The tax rate reduction required a remeasurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the date of enactment. Accordingly, net deferred tax assets, including the related valuation allowance, were reduced by $10.7 million and the change was recorded as an increase to the 2017 tax provision. In addition, during 2018 we recorded a net tax benefit of $5.0 million primarily related to deducting contributions to our qualified pension plans on our 2017 federal tax returns at the higher 2017 income tax rate.
Income tax expense consists of the following for the years ended December 31:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Current |
|
$ |
7,038 |
|
|
$ |
16,657 |
|
|
$ |
(6,178 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
11,370 |
|
|
|
14,325 |
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
$ |
19,199 |
|
|
$ |
32,021 |
|
|
$ |
(4,325 |
) |
79
Income tax expense differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for 2018 and 35% for 2017 and 2016 to income before income taxes due to the following for the years ended December 31:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
U.S. federal statutory income tax |
|
$ |
29,837 |
|
|
$ |
41,466 |
|
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
REIT income not subject to federal income tax |
|
|
(8,773 |
) |
|
|
(20,651 |
) |
|
|
(7,199 |
) |
U.S. tax rate change on deferred tax assets and liabilities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,528 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Pension contribution deducted at higher tax rate |
|
|
(5,665 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Intercompany profit-in-inventory elimination adjustment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax |
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
Domestic production activities deduction |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,511 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Permanent book-tax differences |
|
|
(771 |
) |
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
(218 |
) |
Research and development credits |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
(689 |
) |
All other items |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
582 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
$ |
19,199 |
|
|
$ |
32,021 |
|
|
$ |
(4,325 |
) |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
(65.4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of significant temporary differences creating deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31 were:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other postretirement employee benefits |
|
$ |
30,523 |
|
|
$ |
27,330 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
Tax credits |
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
Nondeductible accruals |
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
2,566 |
|
Incentive compensation |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
Other |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
37,623 |
|
|
|
35,002 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(790 |
) |
|
|
(790 |
) |
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance |
|
|
36,833 |
|
|
|
34,212 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timber and timberlands, net |
|
|
(1,025 |
) |
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
(58,909 |
) |
|
|
(12,683 |
) |
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
(4,134 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Real estate development |
|
|
(2,035 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other |
|
|
(2,739 |
) |
|
|
(301 |
) |
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(68,842 |
) |
|
|
(14,416 |
) |
Deferred tax (liabilities) assets, net |
|
$ |
(32,009 |
) |
|
$ |
19,796 |
|
As of December 31, 2018, we had no federal net operating loss carryforwards. State net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards were $1.0 million that expire from 2021 through 2022 and Idaho Investment Tax Credits were $3.2 million that expire from 2019 through 2032. We use the flow-through method of accounting for investment tax credits.
With the exception of the $0.8 million valuation allowance related to certain Idaho Investment Tax Credit carryforwards we expect will expire prior to realization, we believe it is more likely than not that we will have sufficient future taxable income to realize our deferred tax assets.
80
The following table summarizes the tax years subject to examination by major taxing jurisdictions:
Jurisdiction |
|
Years |
Federal |
|
2015 — 2018 |
Arkansas |
|
2015 — 2018 |
Idaho |
|
2015 — 2018 |
Michigan |
|
2014 — 2018 |
Minnesota |
|
2013 — 2018 |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2018, we had $0.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits which, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. There was $0.6 million unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2017 and $0.9 million unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016. We currently believe there is a reasonable possibility that the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease in the next 12 months based on the closing of certain ongoing state tax examinations.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Reduction for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
We reflect accrued interest related to tax obligations, as well as penalties, in our provision for income taxes. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we recognized insignificant amounts related to interest and penalties in our tax provision. At December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we had insignificant amounts of accrued interest related to tax obligations and no accrued interest receivable with respect to open tax refunds.
NOTE 20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
OPERATING LEASES
We have operating leases primarily for office space, machinery and equipment expiring at various dates through 2033. We expect that most leases will be renewed or replaced in the normal course of business as they expire.
As of December 31, 2018, the future minimum rental payments required under our operating leases are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
$ |
5,130 |
|
2020 |
|
|
4,135 |
|
2021 |
|
|
3,142 |
|
2022 |
|
|
1,538 |
|
2023 |
|
|
629 |
|
2024 and thereafter |
|
|
575 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,149 |
|
Operating lease expense was $5.0 million, $4.5 million and $4.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
81
In January 2007, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notified us that we were a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Clean Water Act for cleanup of a site known as Avery Landing in northern Idaho. We owned a portion of the land at the Avery Landing site, which we acquired in 1980 from the Milwaukee Railroad. The land we owned at the site and adjacent properties were contaminated with petroleum as a result of the Milwaukee Railroad's operations at the site prior to 1980. Our remediation was completed in October 2013. In 2016, the EPA confirmed that Potlatch had completed the cleanup and subsequent monitoring required by the unilateral order. On September 25, 2015, the EPA sent us a letter asserting that the EPA and the Department of Transportation (the current owner of a portion of the adjacent property remediated by the EPA) (DOT) had incurred $9.8 million in unreimbursed response costs associated with the site and that we were liable for such costs. On December 22, 2017, we sold the land at Avery Landing. On April 10, 2018, the United States District Court for the District of Idaho entered a Consent Decree negotiated by the parties releasing us and our affiliates from any further liability for past response costs incurred by the United States Government in exchange for a final settlement payment of $6 million, which was paid in April 2018.
At any given time, we are subject to claims and actions incidental to the operations of our business. Based on information currently available, we do not expect that any sums we may receive or have to pay in connection with any legal proceeding would have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, operating results or net cash flow.
Our businesses are organized into three reportable operating segments: Resource, Wood Products and Real Estate. Management activities in the Resource segment include planting and harvesting trees and building and maintaining roads. The Resource segment also generates revenues from non-timber resources such as hunting leases, recreation permits and leases, mineral rights leases, oil and gas royalties, biomass production and carbon sequestration. The Wood Products segment manufactures and markets lumber and plywood. The business of our Real Estate segment includes the sale of land holdings deemed non-strategic or identified as having higher and better use alternatives. The Real Estate segment also engages in master planned communities and development activities.
The reporting segments follow the same accounting policies used for our Consolidated Financial Statements, with the exception of the valuation of inventories. All segment inventories are reported using the average cost method and any LIFO reserve is recorded at the corporate level.
Management primarily evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based upon Adjusted EBITDDA. Adjusted EBITDDA is calculated as net income (loss) before interest expense, income taxes, basis of real estate sold, depreciation, depletion and amortization. Adjusted EBITDDA further excludes certain specific items that are considered to hinder comparison of the performance of our businesses either year-on-year or with other businesses. Although Adjusted EBITDDA is not a measure of financial condition or performance determined in accordance with GAAP, management uses Adjusted EBITDDA to compare the operating performance of segments on a consistent basis and to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of each segment’s operational strategies. Our calculation of Adjusted EBITDDA may not be comparable to that reported by other companies. The segment information for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 have also been revised to reflect this change.
The following table summarizes information on revenues, Adjusted EBITDDA, depreciation, depletion and amortization, basis of real estate sold, total assets and capital expenditures for each of the company’s reportable segments and includes a reconciliation of Total Adjusted EBITDDA to income before income taxes. Corporate information is included to reconcile segment data to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
82
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resource |
|
$ |
354,950 |
|
|
$ |
278,199 |
|
|
$ |
256,163 |
|
Wood Products |
|
|
680,931 |
|
|
|
441,157 |
|
|
|
367,426 |
|
Real Estate |
|
|
54,566 |
|
|
|
30,655 |
|
|
|
32,604 |
|
|
|
|
1,090,447 |
|
|
|
750,011 |
|
|
|
656,193 |
|
Intersegment Resource revenues1 |
|
|
(115,868 |
) |
|
|
(71,416 |
) |
|
|
(57,094 |
) |
Total consolidated revenues |
|
$ |
974,579 |
|
|
$ |
678,595 |
|
|
$ |
599,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resource |
|
$ |
169,834 |
|
|
$ |
126,707 |
|
|
$ |
106,151 |
|
Wood Products |
|
|
130,583 |
|
|
|
80,624 |
|
|
|
33,574 |
|
Real Estate |
|
|
40,304 |
|
|
|
25,720 |
|
|
|
27,582 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(37,785 |
) |
|
|
(34,302 |
) |
|
|
(29,346 |
) |
Eliminations and adjustments |
|
|
(5,743 |
) |
|
|
(2,992 |
) |
|
|
(3,508 |
) |
Total Adjusted EBITDDA |
|
|
297,193 |
|
|
|
195,757 |
|
|
|
134,453 |
|
Basis of real estate sold |
|
|
(16,698 |
) |
|
|
(6,827 |
) |
|
|
(8,011 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(70,848 |
) |
|
|
(28,432 |
) |
|
|
(32,211 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(35,227 |
) |
|
|
(27,049 |
) |
|
|
(28,941 |
) |
Non-operating pension and other postretirement employee benefits |
|
|
(7,648 |
) |
|
|
(6,384 |
) |
|
|
(9,139 |
) |
(Loss) gain on fixed assets |
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
Loss on sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(48,522 |
) |
Inventory purchase price adjustment in cost of goods sold3 |
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Environmental charges for Avery Landing |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4,978 |
) |
|
|
(1,022 |
) |
Deltic merger-related costs4 |
|
|
(22,119 |
) |
|
|
(3,409 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
142,079 |
|
|
$ |
118,474 |
|
|
$ |
6,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resource |
|
$ |
48,201 |
|
|
$ |
20,476 |
|
|
$ |
24,090 |
|
Wood Products |
|
|
21,416 |
|
|
|
7,347 |
|
|
|
7,357 |
|
Real Estate |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
|
70,848 |
|
|
|
28,432 |
|
|
|
32,211 |
|
Bond discount and deferred loan fees5 |
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
1,979 |
|
Total depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
$ |
73,161 |
|
|
$ |
29,912 |
|
|
$ |
34,190 |
|
Basis of real estate sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
$ |
16,954 |
|
|
$ |
7,114 |
|
|
$ |
8,518 |
|
Elimination and adjustments |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(507 |
) |
Total basis of real estate sold |
|
$ |
16,698 |
|
|
$ |
6,827 |
|
|
$ |
8,011 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resource |
|
$ |
1,693,162 |
|
|
$ |
669,288 |
|
|
$ |
661,899 |
|
Wood Products |
|
|
456,306 |
|
|
|
154,479 |
|
|
|
150,855 |
|
Real Estate |
|
|
93,208 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
|
2,242,676 |
|
|
|
824,719 |
|
|
|
813,707 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
83,176 |
|
|
|
128,360 |
|
|
|
113,974 |
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
2,325,852 |
|
|
$ |
953,079 |
|
|
$ |
927,681 |
|
Capital Expenditures:6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resource |
|
$ |
17,232 |
|
|
$ |
15,120 |
|
|
$ |
13,311 |
|
Wood Products |
|
|
27,341 |
|
|
|
10,723 |
|
|
|
5,491 |
|
Real Estate |
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
45,511 |
|
|
|
25,930 |
|
|
|
18,913 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
47,258 |
|
|
$ |
28,062 |
|
|
$ |
19,288 |
|
1 |
Intersegment revenues represent logs sold by our Resource segment to the Wood Products segment. |
2 |
In the second quarter of 2016, we sold approximately 172,000 acres of timberlands located in central Idaho for $114 million at a loss of $48.5 million before taxes. |
3 |
The effect of costs of goods sold for fair value adjustments to the carrying amounts of inventory acquired in business combinations. |
4 |
See Note 18: Merger, Integration and other costs. |
5 |
Bond discounts and deferred loan fees are reported within interest expense, net on the Consolidated Statement of Income. |
6 |
Does not include the acquisition of timber and timberlands, all of which were acquired by the Resource segment. |
83
All of our timberlands, wood products facilities and other assets are located within the continental United States. Geographic information regarding our revenues is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|||
United States |
|
$ |
972,457 |
|
|
$ |
676,956 |
|
|
$ |
597,899 |
|
Canada |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
1,498 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
Total consolidated revenues |
|
$ |
974,579 |
|
|
$ |
678,595 |
|
|
$ |
599,099 |
|
No customers represented more than 10% of our consolidated revenues in 2018. One customer accounted for slightly more than 10% of our total consolidated revenues in 2017 and 2016.
NOTE 22. FINANCIAL RESULTS BY QUARTER (UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
||||||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
199,897 |
|
|
$ |
149,681 |
|
|
$ |
268,233 |
|
|
$ |
163,229 |
|
|
$ |
289,199 |
|
|
$ |
190,441 |
|
|
$ |
217,250 |
|
|
$ |
175,244 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
27,831 |
|
|
$ |
25,815 |
|
|
$ |
69,417 |
|
|
$ |
42,059 |
|
|
$ |
77,742 |
|
|
$ |
45,389 |
|
|
$ |
9,964 |
|
|
$ |
38,644 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,597 |
|
|
$ |
16,921 |
|
|
$ |
46,148 |
|
|
$ |
24,244 |
|
|
$ |
60,336 |
|
|
$ |
33,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,799 |
|
|
$ |
11,588 |
|
Net income per share1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
1 |
Per share amounts are computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly per share amounts may not equal the total computed for the year. |
Our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, include the quarterly results for the first nine months of each respective year. During the fourth quarter of 2018 and 2017, we incurred $0.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively, in merger-related costs associated with the Deltic merger. See Note 18: Merger, Integration and Other Costs for additional information.
84
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We conducted an evaluation (pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)), under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2018. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2018.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).
Based on our assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2018, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has audited the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, as stated in their report which appears on the next page.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the latest fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
None.
85
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
PotlatchDeltic Corporation:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited PotlatchDeltic Corporation and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 27, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
86
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Seattle, Washington
February 27, 2019
87
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Certain of the information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the headings "Board of Directors," "Corporate Governance" and "Security Ownership – Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" from our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 29, 2019.
Our Corporate Conduct and Ethics Code, which is applicable to all directors, officers and employees, can be found on our website at www.PotlatchDeltic.com. We post any amendments to or waivers from our Corporate Conduct and Ethics Code on our website.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
As of February 27, 2019, information on our executive officers is as follows:
Michael J. Covey (age 61), has served as Chief Executive Officer since February 2006 and served as President and Chief Executive Officer from February 2006 to March 2013. He has been a director of the Company since February 2006 and has served as Chairman of the Board of the Company since January 2007.
Eric J. Cremers (age 55), has served as President and Chief Operating Officer and a director of the company since March 2013, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from March 2012 to March 2013, and as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer from July 2007 to March 2012.
Jerald W. Richards (age 50), has served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since September 2013. He was employed by Weyerhaeuser Company and served as Chief Accounting Officer from October 2010 to August 2013, and corporate segment controller from 2008 to October 2010.
Thomas J. Temple (age 62), has served as Vice President, Wood Products since February 2018, and as Vice President, Wood Products and Southern Resource from February 2012 to February 2018.
Darin R. Ball (age 53), has served as Vice President of Resource since December 2017. From 2012 to December 2017 he served as Manager of our Idaho Resource business.
William R. DeReu (age 52), has served as Vice President, Real Estate since February 2018 and as Vice President, Real Estate and Lake States Resource from February 2012 to February 2018.
Lorrie D. Scott (age 64), has served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since July 2010. Prior to July 2010, she was employed at Weyerhaeuser Realty Investors, Inc., and served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel from October 2007 to July 2010.
Wayne Wasechek (age 48) has served as Controller and Principal Accounting Officer since November 2018. He previously served as Vice President and Assistant Controller of Vail Resorts, Inc. (NYSE: MTN) from 2011 to 2018 and as Senior Director of Financial Reporting of Vail Resorts from 2006 to 2011.
The term of office of the officers of the company expires at the annual meeting of our board and each officer holds office until the officer’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until the earlier of the officer’s death, resignation, retirement, removal by the board or as otherwise provided in our bylaws.
88
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information set forth under the headings "Report of the Executive Compensation and Personnel Policies Committee," "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Executive Compensation Tables," “CEO Pay Ratio,” "Compensation of Non-Employee Directors" and "Corporate Governance - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 29, 2019, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information regarding any person or group known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock as well as the security ownership of management set forth under the heading "Security Ownership" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 29, 2019, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this item regarding certain relationships and related transactions is to be included under the heading "Corporate Governance - Transactions with Related Persons" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 29, 2019, and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this item regarding director independence is to be included under the headings "Board of Directors" and "Corporate Governance - Director Independence" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about M March 29, 2019, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item regarding principal accounting fees and services is to be included under the heading "Audit Committee Report - Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in 2018 and 2017" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 29, 2019, and is incorporated herein by reference.
89
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) (1) Financial Statements:
The financial statements required by this item are submitted in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedule:
Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.
(a) (3) Exhibits:
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT NUMBER |
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
(2)* |
|
|
|
3(a)(i)* |
|
|
|
(3)(b)* |
|
|
|
(4) |
See Exhibits (3)(a) and (3)(b). The Registrant also undertakes to furnish to the SEC, upon request, any instrument defining the rights of holders of long-term debt. |
|
|
(4)(a)* |
|
|
|
(4)(a)(i)* |
Form of 7 1/2% Senior Notes due 2019 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4(a)). |
|
|
(4)(a)(ii)* |
|
|
|
(4)(b)* |
|
|
|
(4)(b)(i)* |
|
|
|
(4)(b)(ii)* |
|
|
|
90
EXHIBIT NUMBER |
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
(10)(a)(i)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(b)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(c)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(c)(i)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(c)(ii)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(d)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(e)(i)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(e)(ii)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(f)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(g)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(h)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(i)(i)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(i)(ii)1* |
91
EXHIBIT NUMBER |
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10)(i)(iii)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(j)(i)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(j)(ii)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(j)(iii)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(j)(iv)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(j)(v)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(j)(vi)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(j)(vii)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(j)(viii)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(k)(i)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(k)(ii)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(l)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(m)1* |
|
|
|
(10)(n)1* |
92
EXHIBIT NUMBER |
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
(10)(o)* |
|
|
|
(10)(p)(i)* |
|
|
|
(10)(p)(ii)* |
|
|
|
(10)(q)* |
|
|
|
(10)(r)*
|
|
(10)(s)* |
|
(21) |
|
|
|
(23) |
|
|
|
(24) |
|
|
|
(31) |
|
|
|
(32) |
|
|
|
(101) |
The following financial information from PotlatchDeltic Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed on February 27, 2019, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
93
EXHIBIT NUMBER |
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Incorporated by reference. |
1 |
Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement. |
None.
94
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION (Registrant) |
|
|
|
||
|
|
By |
/s/ MICHAEL J. COVEY |
|
|
|
Michael J. Covey |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Date: February 27, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on February 27, 2019, by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated.
|
/s/ MICHAEL J. COVEY |
|
Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Michael J. Covey |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
/s/ ERIC J. CREMERS |
|
Director, President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
Eric J. Cremers |
|
|
|
/s/ JERALD W. RICHARDS |
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Jerald W. Richards |
|
|
|
/s/ WAYNE WASECHEK |
|
Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
Wayne Wasechek
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Director |
|
Linda M. Breard
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Director |
|
William L. Driscoll
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Director |
|
Christoph Keller, III |
|
|
|
* |
|
Director |
|
D. Mark Leland
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Director |
|
Charles P. Grenier
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Director |
|
John S. Moody
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Director |
|
Lawrence S. Peiros
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
* |
|
Director |
|
R. Hunter Pierson
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Director |
|
Gregory L. Quesnel
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Director |
|
Lenore M. Sullivan |
|
|
|
*By |
|
/s/ LORRIE D. SCOTT |
|
|
|
Lorrie D. Scott |
|
|
|
(Attorney-in-fact) |
96