sv4za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 5, 2007
Registration
No. 333-139642
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
3674
|
|
94-2712976
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
1621 Barber Lane
Milpitas, California 95035
(408)
433-8000
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of Registrants
principal executive offices)
Abhijit Y. Talwalkar
President and Chief Executive Officer
LSI Logic Corporation
1621 Barber Lane
Milpitas, California 95035
(408) 433-8000
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry W. Sonsini, Esq.
Matthew W. Sonsini, Esq.
Michael S. Ringler, Esq.
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
(650) 493-9300
|
|
Andrew S. Hughes, Esq.,
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
1621 Barber Lane
Milpitas, California 95035
(408)
433-8000
|
|
Jean F. Rankin, Esq.,
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
AGERE SYSTEMS INC.
1110 American
Parkway NE
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18109
(610) 712-1000
|
|
Stephen F. Arcano, Esq.
Ann Beth Stebbins, Esq.
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE,
MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
Four Times Square
New York, New York 10036
(212) 735-3000
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: Upon completion of the merger described
herein.
If the securities being registered on this form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check
the following box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information contained herein is subject to completion or
amendment. No securities may be sold until a registration
statement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission is effective. This preliminary proxy
statement/prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities
and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities, nor
shall there be sale of these securities, in any jurisdiction in
which such offer, solicitation or sale is not permitted or would
be unlawful.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
FEBRUARY 5, 2007
MERGER PROPOSED YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
The boards of directors of each of LSI Logic Corporation and
Agere Systems Inc. have approved the merger of Agere with a
wholly owned subsidiary of LSI. If the proposed merger is
completed, Agere stockholders will receive 2.16 shares of
LSI common stock for each share of Agere common stock they own
at the completion of the merger.
Based on the number of shares of LSI and Agere common stock
outstanding on January 31, 2007, Agere stockholders are
expected to hold approximately 48% of the fully diluted shares
of LSI common stock following the completion of the merger. LSI
stockholders will continue to own their existing shares, which
will not be adjusted by the merger.
LSI common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol LSI. As of February 2, 2007, the last
trading day before the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the last reported sales price of
LSI common stock at the end of regular trading hours, as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange, was $9.28.
LSI and Agere cannot complete the merger unless LSI stockholders
approve the issuance of shares of LSI common stock in the
merger and Agere stockholders adopt the merger agreement. The
obligations of LSI and Agere to complete the merger are also
subject to the satisfaction or waiver of several other
conditions to the merger. More information about LSI, Agere and
the merger is contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. We encourage you to read carefully this
joint proxy statement/prospectus before voting, including the
section entitled Risk Factors beginning on
page 14.
The LSI board of directors recommends that LSI stockholders
vote FOR the proposal to approve the issuance of
shares of LSI common stock in the merger. The Agere board of
directors recommends that Agere stockholders vote
FOR the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.
The proposals are being presented to the respective stockholders
of each company at their special or annual meetings. The dates,
times and places of the meetings are as follows:
|
|
|
For LSI stockholders:
March 29, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at
|
|
For Agere stockholders:
March 29, 2007 at 9:00 a.m., local time, at
|
1621 Barber Lane, Milpitas,
California
|
|
The Edward Nash Theater
Raritan Valley Community College
Route 28W and Lamington Road
North Branch, New Jersey 08876
|
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to
attend your respective companys meeting, please take the
time to vote by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card
to your respective company or, if the option is available to
you, by granting your proxy electronically over the Internet or
by telephone. If your shares are held in street
name, you must instruct your broker in order to vote.
|
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abhijit Y. Talwalkar
President and Chief Executive Officer
LSI Logic Corporation
|
|
Richard L. Clemmer
President and Chief Executive Officer
Agere Systems Inc.
|
None of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any state
securities regulator or any regulatory authority has approved or
disapproved of these transactions or the securities to be issued
under this joint proxy statement/prospectus or determined if the
disclosure in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate
or adequate. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated February 5,
2007, and is first being mailed to stockholders of
LSI and Agere on or about February 8, 2007.
LSI Logic Corporation
1621 Barber Lane
Milpitas, California 95035
(408) 433-8000
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
LSI STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders of LSI Logic Corporation:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting of Stockholders of
LSI Logic Corporation, a Delaware corporation, will be held on
March 29, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., local time,
at 1621 Barber Lane, Milpitas, California to consider
and vote upon a proposal to approve the issuance of shares of
LSI Logic Corporation common stock in connection with a merger
of Atlas Acquisition Corp. with and into Agere Systems Inc.
contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger among LSI,
Atlas Acquisition Corp. and Agere.
Any action on the item of business described above may be
considered at the special meeting at the time and on the date
specified above or at any time and date to which the special
meeting may be properly adjourned or postponed.
After careful consideration, the LSI board of directors
unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable
and in the best interests of the LSI stockholders and has
unanimously approved the merger agreement. The LSI board of
directors recommends that the LSI stockholders vote
FOR the proposal to approve the issuance of shares
of LSI common stock in connection with the merger.
You are entitled to vote only if you were a holder of LSI common
stock at the close of business on February 2, 2007.
You are entitled to attend the special meeting only if you were
an LSI stockholder or joint holder as of the close of business
on February 2, 2007 or hold a valid proxy for the special
meeting.
The special meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m.,
local time. Check-in will begin at 9:30 a.m., local time,
and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to
attend the special meeting, we encourage you to read the joint
proxy statement/prospectus and submit your proxy or voting
instructions for the special meeting as soon as possible. You
may submit your proxy or voting instructions for the special
meeting by completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy
card or voting instruction card in the pre-addressed envelope
provided. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares,
please refer to the section entitled The Special Meeting
of LSI Stockholders beginning on page 27 of the joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
ANDREW S. HUGHES
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
February 5, 2007
Milpitas, California
Agere Systems Inc.
1110 American Parkway NE
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18109
(610) 712-1000
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
AGERE STOCKHOLDERS
Agere Systems Inc. will hold its Annual Meeting of Stockholders
at the Edward Nash Theater at the Raritan Valley Community
College, Route 28W and Lamington Road, North Branch, New
Jersey 08876, on March 29, 2007, 9:00 a.m., local
time. We are holding the meeting for the following purposes:
1. To consider and vote on the proposal to adopt the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 3, 2006
(which we refer to as the merger agreement), by and among Agere,
LSI Logic Corporation and Atlas Acquisition Corp.;
2. To elect three members of the Agere board of directors
for terms described in the joint proxy statement/prospectus;
3. To re-approve the Agere Short Term Incentive Plan;
4. To ratify the Audit Committees selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007; and
5. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof.
The Agere board of directors has approved the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement by unanimous vote of the directors present, and
recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to adopt
the merger agreement, which is described in detail in the joint
proxy statement/prospectus. The Agere board of
directors also recommends that you vote FOR each of
the director nominees of Agere listed in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, FOR the re-approval of
Ageres Short Term Incentive Plan and FOR the
ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
Ageres independent registered public accounting firm for
fiscal 2007.
Holders of record of Agere common stock at the close of business
on February 2, 2007, are entitled to vote at the meeting. A
list of stockholders eligible to vote at the Agere annual
meeting will be available for inspection at the annual meeting
and at the offices of Agere in Allentown, Pennsylvania during
regular business hours for a period of no less than ten days
prior to the annual meeting.
In addition to the joint proxy statement/prospectus, proxy card
and voting instructions, Agere stockholders are receiving a copy
of the Agere 2006 annual report on
Form 10-K.
You can vote your shares by completing and returning a proxy
card. Most stockholders can also vote over the Internet or by
telephone. If Internet and telephone voting are available to
you, you can find voting instructions in the materials
accompanying the joint proxy statement/prospectus. You can
revoke a proxy at any time prior to its exercise at the meeting
by following the instructions in the enclosed joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
JEAN F. RANKIN
Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
February 5, 2007
Allentown, Pennsylvania
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
v
|
|
|
|
|
v
|
|
|
|
|
vi
|
|
|
|
|
vii
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i
This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important
business and financial information about LSI and Agere from
documents that each company has filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission but that have not been included in or
delivered with this joint proxy statement/prospectus. For a
listing of documents incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, please see the section entitled
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 134 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
LSI will provide you with copies of this information relating
to LSI, without charge, upon written or oral request to:
LSI Logic
Corporation
1621 Barber Lane
Milpitas, California 95035
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone Number:
1-800-433-8778
In addition, you may obtain copies of this information by
making a request through LSIs investor relations by
sending an
e-mail to
investorrelations@lsi.com.
Agere will provide you with copies of this information
relating to Agere, without charge, upon written or oral request
to:
Agere Systems Inc.
1110 American Parkway NE
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18109
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone Number:
1-800-372-2477
In addition, you may obtain copies of this information by
making a request through Ageres investor relations by
sending an
e-mail to
investor@agere.com.
In order for you to receive timely delivery of the documents
in advance of the LSI special meeting, LSI should receive your
request no later than March 22, 2007.
In order for you to receive timely delivery of the documents
in advance of the Agere annual meeting, Agere should receive
your request no later than March 22, 2007.
iv
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
General
Questions and Answers
The following questions and answers briefly address some
commonly asked questions about the LSI special meeting, the
Agere annual meeting and the merger. They may not include all
the information that is important to stockholders of LSI and
Agere. Agere and LSI urge stockholders to read carefully this
entire joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the annexes
and the other documents referred to herein. Page references are
included in this summary to direct you to more detailed
discussions elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why am I receiving this joint proxy
statement/prospectus? |
|
A: |
|
LSI and Agere have agreed to combine their businesses under the
terms of a merger agreement that is described in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. A copy of the merger agreement is
attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex A. |
|
|
|
In order to complete the merger, LSI stockholders must approve
the issuance of shares of LSI common stock in connection with
the merger and Agere stockholders must adopt the merger
agreement. LSI will hold a special meeting of its stockholders
and Agere will hold an annual meeting of its stockholders to
obtain these approvals. Agere is also asking its stockholders to
approve other matters in connection with its annual meeting that
are described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This
joint proxy statement/prospectus contains important information
about the merger and the stockholder meetings of each of LSI and
Agere, and you should read it carefully. For LSI stockholders,
the enclosed voting materials for the LSI special meeting allow
LSI stockholders to vote shares of LSI common stock without
attending the LSI special meeting. For Agere stockholders, the
enclosed voting materials for the Agere annual meeting allow
Agere stockholders to vote shares of Agere common stock without
attending the Agere annual meeting. |
|
|
|
Stockholder votes are important. LSI and Agere encourage
stockholders of each company to vote as soon as possible.
For more specific information on how to vote, please see the
questions and answers for each of the LSI and Agere stockholders
below. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why are LSI and Agere proposing the merger? (see
page 68) |
|
|
|
A: |
|
After reviewing strategic alternatives to address the
opportunities and challenges facing our companies, the boards of
directors of both LSI and Agere reached the same
conclusion this merger represents the best
strategic alternative for our respective companies. |
|
|
|
Specifically, LSI and Agere believe the merger will provide
certain strategic and financial benefits, including the
following: |
|
|
|
An increase in product development capabilities;
|
|
|
|
Greater depth of relationships with customers;
|
|
|
|
An enhanced intellectual property portfolio; and
|
|
|
|
A reduction in operating costs.
|
|
Q: |
|
When do LSI and Agere expect to complete the
merger? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
LSI and Agere currently plan to complete the merger shortly
following the LSI and Agere stockholder meetings. However,
neither LSI nor Agere can predict the exact timing of the
completion of the merger because the merger is subject to
governmental and regulatory review processes and other
conditions. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How do the boards of directors of LSI and Agere recommend
that I vote? (see pages 27 and 41) |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The LSI board of directors recommends that LSI stockholders vote
FOR the proposal to approve the issuance of shares
of LSI common stock in connection with the merger. |
|
|
|
The Agere board of directors recommends that Agere stockholders
vote FOR the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. |
|
Q: |
|
What should I do now? |
|
A: |
|
Please review this joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully
and vote as soon as possible. Most LSI and Agere stockholders
may vote over the Internet or by telephone. Stockholders may
also vote by signing, dating and returning each proxy card and
voting instruction card received. |
v
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting
materials? (see page 27) |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Please vote each proxy card and voting instruction card that you
receive. You may receive more than one set of voting materials,
including multiple copies of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and multiple proxy cards or voting
instruction cards. For example, stockholders who hold shares in
more than one brokerage account will receive a separate voting
instruction card for each brokerage account in which shares are
held. If shares are held in more than one name, stockholders
will receive more than one proxy or voting instruction card. In
addition, if you are a stockholder of both LSI and Agere, you
may receive one or more proxy cards or voting instruction cards
for LSI and one or more proxy cards or voting instruction cards
for Agere. If you are a stockholder of both LSI and Agere,
please note that a vote for the issuance of shares in connection
with the merger for the LSI special meeting will not constitute
a vote for the proposal to adopt the merger agreement for the
Agere annual meeting, and vice versa. Therefore, please vote
each proxy and voting instruction card you receive, whether from
LSI or Agere. |
Questions
and Answers for LSI Stockholders
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When and where is the LSI special meeting? (see
page 27) |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The special meeting of LSI stockholders will be held at
10:00 a.m., local time, on March 29, 2007, at 1621 Barber
Lane, Milpitas, California. Check-in will begin at
9:30 a.m., local time. Please allow ample time for the
check-in procedures. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How can I attend the LSI special meeting? (see
page 27) |
|
|
|
A: |
|
LSI stockholders or joint holders as of the close of business on
February 2, 2007, and those who hold a valid proxy for the
special meeting are entitled to attend the LSI special meeting.
LSI stockholders should be prepared to present photo
identification for admittance. In addition, names of record
holders will be verified against the list of record holders on
the record date prior to being admitted to the meeting. LSI
stockholders who are not record holders but who hold shares
through a broker or nominee (i.e., in street name), should
provide proof of beneficial ownership on the record date, such
as most recent account statement prior to February 2, 2007, or
other similar evidence of ownership. If LSI stockholders do not
provide photo identification or comply with the other procedures
outlined above upon request, they will not be admitted to the
LSI special meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
The LSI special meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m.
Check-in will begin at 9:30 a.m., local time, and you
should allow ample time for the check-in procedures. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the vote of LSI stockholders required to approve
the issuance of shares of LSI common stock in connection with
the merger? (see page 28) |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The issuance of shares of LSI common stock in connection with
the merger requires an affirmative vote of a majority of the
votes cast at the LSI special meeting, provided that the total
votes cast on the proposal represents over 50% of all shares of
LSI common stock entitled to vote on the proposal. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
As an LSI stockholder, how can I vote? (see
page 28) |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Stockholders of record as of the record date may vote in person
by attending the LSI special meeting, by completing and
returning a proxy card or, if you hold your shares in street
name, a voting instruction form. Most stockholders can also vote
over the Internet or by telephone. If Internet and telephone
voting are available, LSI stockholders can find voting
instructions in the materials accompanying this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at
11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on March 28, 2007. Please be
aware that LSI stockholders who vote over the Internet may incur
costs such as telephone and Internet access charges for which
they will be responsible. |
|
|
|
|
|
The method by which LSI stockholders vote will in no way limit
the right to vote at the meeting if you later decide to attend
in person. If shares are held in street name, LSI stockholders
must obtain a proxy, executed in their favor, from their broker
or other holder of record, to be able to vote at the meeting. |
|
|
|
If shares are held through a broker, such shares may be voted
even if holders of such shares do not vote or attend the special
meeting. Broker non-votes, if any, will not be
counted as votes cast on the proposal to issue shares of LSI
common stock in connection with the merger. |
vi
|
|
|
|
|
All shares entitled to vote and represented by properly
completed proxies received prior to the LSI special meeting and
not revoked will be voted at the meeting in accordance with your
instructions. If a signed proxy card is returned without
indicating how shares should be voted on a matter and the proxy
is not revoked, the shares represented by such proxy will be
voted as the LSI board of directors recommends and therefore
FOR the issuance of shares in connection with the
merger. |
|
|
|
|
|
For a more detailed explanation of the voting procedures, please
see the section entitled Voting Procedures beginning
on page 28 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
As an LSI stockholder, what happens if I do not vote? (see
page 28) |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Failure to vote or give voting instructions to your broker or
nominee for the LSI special meeting could make it more difficult
to meet the voting requirement that the total votes cast on the
proposal represent over 50% of all shares of LSI common stock
entitled to vote on the proposal. Therefore, LSI urges LSI
stockholders to vote. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
As an LSI stockholder, may I change my vote after I have
submitted a proxy card or voting instruction card? (see
page 29) |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. LSI stockholders may revoke a previously granted proxy or
voting instruction at any time prior to the special meeting by: |
|
|
|
signing and returning a later dated proxy or voting
instruction card for the LSI special meeting; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
attending the LSI special meeting and voting in
person, as described in the section entitled The Special
Meeting of LSI Stockholders beginning on page 27 of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only the last submitted proxy or voting instruction card will be
considered. Please submit a proxy or voting instruction card for
the LSI special meeting as soon as possible. |
|
Q: |
|
What do LSI stockholders need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
Carefully read and consider the information contained in and
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including its annexes. In order for LSI
shares to be represented at the special meeting, LSI
stockholders can (1) vote through the Internet or by
telephone by following the instructions included on their proxy
card, (2) indicate on the enclosed proxy card how they
would like to vote and return the proxy card in the accompanying
pre-addressed postage paid envelope, or (3) attend the LSI
special meeting in person. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can answer questions? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
LSI stockholders with questions about the merger or the other
matters to be voted on at the LSI special meeting or who desire
additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or
additional proxy cards should contact: |
Georgeson Inc.
17 State Street, 10th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Toll Free:
(866) 783-6820
Banks and Brokerage Firms:
(212) 440-9800
|
|
|
|
|
If you need additional copies of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or voting materials, contact
Georgeson Inc. as described above or send an
e-mail to
investorrelations@lsi.com. |
Questions
and Answers for Agere Stockholders
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why are Agere stockholders receiving this joint proxy
statement/prospectus? |
|
A: |
|
In order to complete the merger, Agere stockholders must adopt
the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
This joint proxy statement/prospectus contains important
information about the proposed merger, the merger agreement and
the Agere annual meeting, which should be read carefully. The
enclosed voting materials allow Agere stockholders to vote
shares without attending the Agere annual meeting. The vote of
Agere stockholders is very important. Agere stockholders are
encouraged to vote as soon as possible. |
|
Q: |
|
What will Agere stockholders receive in the merger? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If the proposed merger is completed, at the effective time of
the merger, Agere stockholders will be entitled to receive
2.16 shares of LSI common stock for each share of Agere
common stock that they own. Agere |
vii
|
|
|
|
|
stockholders will receive cash for any fractional shares they
would otherwise receive in the merger. The amount of cash for
fractional shares will be calculated by multiplying the
fractional share interest to which each such stockholder would
be entitled by the per share closing price of shares of LSI
common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the
closing date. Following the completion of the merger, former
Agere stockholders are expected to own approximately 48% of the
fully diluted shares of the combined company based on the number
of shares of LSI and Agere outstanding as of January 31,
2007, excluding shares issuable on conversion of Ageres
outstanding convertible notes. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What if I have Agere stock options? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Each outstanding option to purchase shares of Agere common
stock, whether or not exercisable, will be converted into an
option to acquire LSI common stock, on the same terms and
conditions as were applicable to such Agere stock option prior
to the effective time of the merger, except that the number of
shares for which such option is or may become exercisable and
the exercise price of the option will be adjusted to reflect the
exchange ratio. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What if I have Agere stock appreciation rights? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Each outstanding stock appreciation right relating to shares of
Agere common stock, whether or not exercisable, will be
converted into a stock appreciation right relating to shares of
LSI common stock, on the same terms and conditions as were
applicable to such Agere stock appreciation right prior to the
effective time of the merger, except that the number of shares
to which the stock appreciation right relates and the exercise
price of the stock appreciation right will be adjusted to
reflect the exchange ratio. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What if I have Agere restricted stock units? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Each Agere outstanding restricted stock unit award will be
converted into an award to receive shares of LSI common stock on
the same terms and conditions that were applicable to such Agere
restricted stock unit award prior to the effective time of the
merger, except that the number of shares subject to the award
will be adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio, and, for any
restricted stock unit award which vests upon a specified date if
performance based criteria are achieved, the performance based
criteria shall be waived and the restricted stock unit award
will vest in accordance with its terms and conditions on the
specified date. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the material United States federal income tax
consequences of the merger to Agere stockholders? |
|
A: |
|
The transaction is intended to be a tax-free reorganization for
United States federal income tax purposes. If the merger
qualifies as a reorganization, Agere stockholders will not
recognize any gain or loss, for federal income tax purposes,
with respect to the shares of LSI common stock they receive in
the merger. However, Ageres stockholders will recognize
gain or loss on any fractional shares of LSI common stock for
which cash is received in lieu of a fractional share. |
|
Q: |
|
Are Agere stockholders entitled to dissenters
rights? |
|
A: |
|
No. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, holders of
Agere common stock are not entitled to dissenters
appraisal rights in connection with the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What matters will Agere stockholders vote on at the annual
meeting? |
|
A: |
|
Agere stockholders will vote on the following proposals: |
|
|
|
To adopt the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
To elect three directors to serve until the next
annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are
elected and qualified or until the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
To re-approve the Agere Short Term Incentive Plan;
|
|
|
|
To ratify the audit committees selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007; and |
|
|
|
To transact such other business as may properly come
before the annual meeting.
|
|
Q: |
|
How does the Agere board of directors recommend that Agere
stockholders vote? |
|
A: |
|
The Agere board of directors, by the unanimous vote of the
directors present, has determined that the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are
advisable and in the best interests of the Agere stockholders
and recommends that Agere stockholders vote FOR the
proposal to adopt the merger |
viii
|
|
|
|
|
agreement. For a more complete description of the
recommendation of the Agere board of directors, see The
Merger Consideration of the Merger by the Agere
Board of Directors Recommendation of the Agere Board
of Directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Agere board of directors also recommends that Agere
stockholders vote FOR each of the director nominees
listed under the heading Election of Agere
Directors, FOR the re-approval of Ageres
Short Term Incentive Plan and FOR the ratification
of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007 at
the annual meeting. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When and where will the Agere annual meeting be
held? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The annual meeting is scheduled to be held at the Edward Nash
Theater at the Raritan Valley Community College, Route 28W
and Lamington Road, North Branch, New Jersey 08876, on
March 29, 2007, at 9:00 a.m., local time. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What vote is needed to adopt the merger agreement and to
approve the other matters at the annual meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The proposal to adopt the merger agreement requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the
shares of Agere common stock outstanding on the record date. |
|
|
|
Re-approval of the Agere Short Term Incentive Plan and
ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
Ageres independent registered public accounting firm for
fiscal 2007 each requires the affirmative vote of the holders of
a majority of the Agere common stock present in person or
represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting.
Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. |
|
Q: |
|
How do Agere stockholders vote? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If you were an Agere stockholder on the record date for the
Agere annual meeting, you may vote at the meeting. Most
stockholders can vote over the Internet or by telephone. If
Internet and telephone voting are available to you, you can find
voting instructions in the materials accompanying this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. You can also vote by completing and
returning a proxy card or, if you hold your shares in street
name, a voting instruction form. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at
11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on March 28, 2007.
Please be aware that Agere stockholders who vote over the
Internet may incur costs such as telephone and Internet access
charges for which they will be responsible. Voting instructions
from participants in Ageres 401(k) plan must be received
by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on March 26,
2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
The method by which Agere stockholders vote will in no way limit
their right to vote at the meeting if such stockholders later
decide to attend in person. If shares are held in street name,
Agere stockholders must obtain a proxy, executed in their favor,
from a broker or other holder of record, to be able to vote at
the meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
If shares are held through a broker, such shares may be voted
even if the Agere stockholder does not vote or attend the annual
meeting. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, member
brokers who do not receive instructions from beneficial owners
will be allowed to vote on the election of directors, the
proposal to re-approve the Short Term Incentive Plan
and the proposal to ratify the audit committees
selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007.
Broker non-votes, if any, will have the same effect
as votes cast against the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you hold shares through Ageres 401(k) plan and do not
vote, those shares will be voted in the same proportion as
shares in the plan that are voted by plan participants. |
|
|
|
|
|
All shares entitled to vote and represented by properly
completed proxies received prior to the Agere annual meeting and
not revoked will be voted at the meeting in accordance with
stockholder instructions. If a signed proxy card is returned
without indicating how shares should be voted on a matter and
the proxy is not revoked, the shares represented by the proxy
will be voted as the Agere board of directors recommends and
therefore FOR the adoption of the merger agreement,
FOR each of the director nominees listed under the
heading Election of Agere Directors, FOR
the re-approval of Ageres Short Term Incentive Plan and
FOR the ratification of the selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007 at the annual
meeting. |
ix
|
|
|
Q: |
|
As an Agere stockholder, can I change my vote after I have
delivered my proxy? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Agere stockholders may revoke a proxy (including an
Internet or telephone vote) at any time before it is exercised
by timely delivery of a properly executed, later-dated proxy or
by voting in person at the meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen if Agere stockholders abstain from voting
or do not vote? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If an Agere stockholder abstains from voting or does not vote,
it will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal to
adopt the merger agreement. If a stockholder is present in
person or by proxy and abstains from voting, it will have the
same effect as a vote against (1) the proposal to
re-approve the Agere Short Term Incentive Plan and (2) the
proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as Ageres independent registered public accounting firm
for fiscal 2007. Abstentions will have no effect on the election
of Agere directors. If an Agere stockholder returns a proxy and
does not indicate how it should be voted, shares represented by
such proxy will be voted as the Agere board of directors
recommends on all matters for consideration at the Agere annual
meeting. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Should Agere stock certificates be sent in now? |
|
A: |
|
No. If the merger is completed, Agere stockholders will
receive written instructions for sending in any stock
certificates they may have. |
|
Q: |
|
What do Agere stockholders need to do now? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Carefully read and consider the information contained in and
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including its annexes. In order for shares
to be represented at the Agere annual meeting, Agere
stockholders can (1) vote over the Internet or by telephone
by following the instructions included on the proxy card,
(2) indicate on the enclosed proxy card how they would like
to vote and return the proxy card in the accompanying
pre-addressed postage paid envelope, or (3) attend the
Agere annual meeting in person. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
As an Agere stockholder, who can answer my
questions? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Agere stockholders with questions about the merger or the other
matters to be voted on at the Agere annual meeting should
contact The Proxy Advisory Group, LLC by phone at
(212) 213-3832,
or toll-free at
1-866-678-1770.
Agere stockholders who desire additional copies of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus or additional proxy cards should send
written requests or inquiries to Agere Systems Inc.,
1110 American Parkway NE,
Room 10A-301C,
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18109, Attention: Response Center, or
call
1-800-372-2447. |
x
SUMMARY
The following is a summary of the information contained in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus relating to the merger. This
summary may not contain all of the information about the merger
that is important to you. For a more complete description of the
merger, LSI and Agere encourage you to read carefully this
entire joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the attached
annexes. In addition, LSI and Agere encourage you to read the
information incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, which includes important business and
financial information about LSI and Agere. Stockholders of LSI
and Agere may obtain the information incorporated by reference
into this joint proxy statement/prospectus without charge by
following the instructions in the section entitled Where
You Can Find More Information beginning on page 134
of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The
Merger and the Merger Agreement (see page 94)
LSI and Agere have agreed to combine their businesses under the
terms of a merger agreement between the companies that is
described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. A copy of
the merger agreement is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex A. Under the terms of the
merger agreement, a newly-formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of LSI
will merge with and into Agere and Agere will survive the merger
as a wholly-owned subsidiary of LSI. Upon completion of the
merger, holders of Agere common stock will be entitled to
receive 2.16 shares of LSI common stock for each share of
Agere common stock they then hold. LSI stockholders will
continue to own their existing shares of LSI common stock after
the merger.
Parties
to the Merger
LSI Logic
Corporation
1621
Barber Lane
Milpitas, California 95035
(408) 433-8000
LSI designs, develops, and markets complex, high-performance
semiconductors and storage systems. In 2005, LSIs
operations were organized in four markets: communications,
consumer products, storage components and storage systems. On
March 6, 2006, LSI announced its plans to focus its
business growth opportunities in the information storage and
consumer markets.
LSI offers integrated circuit products, board-level products,
and software for use in consumer applications, high-performance
storage controllers, enterprise hard disk controllers, and
systems for storage area networks. LSIs integrated
circuits are also used in a wide range of communication devices.
LSI operates in two segments the semiconductor
segment and the storage systems segment in which LSI
offers products and services for a variety of electronic systems
applications. LSIs products are marketed primarily to
original equipment manufacturers that sell products to
LSIs target markets.
LSI was incorporated in California on November 6, 1980, and
was reincorporated in Delaware on June 11, 1987. LSIs
principal offices are located at 1621 Barber Lane, Milpitas,
California 95035, and LSIs telephone number at that
location is
(408) 433-8000.
LSIs home page on the Internet is www.lsi.com.
Agere
Systems Inc.
1110
American Parkway NE
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18109
(610) 712-1000
Agere is a leading provider of integrated circuit solutions for
a variety of computing and communications applications. Some of
Ageres solutions include related software and reference
designs. Ageres solutions are used in products such as
hard disk drives, mobile phones, high-speed communications
systems and personal computers. Agere also licenses its
intellectual property to others.
1
Atlas
Acquisition Corp.
1621
Barber Lane
Milpitas, California 95035
(408) 433-8000
Atlas Acquisition Corp. is a newly-formed, wholly-owned
subsidiary of LSI. LSI formed Atlas Acquisition Corp. solely to
effect the merger, and Atlas Acquisition Corp. has not conducted
and will not conduct any business during any period of its
existence.
Recommendation
of the LSI Board of Directors (see page 69)
After careful consideration, the LSI board of directors
unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the LSI
stockholders, and has unanimously approved the merger agreement.
The LSI board of directors recommends that the LSI stockholders
vote FOR the proposal to approve the issuance of
shares of LSI common stock in connection with the merger.
Opinion
of LSI Financial Advisor Regarding the Merger (see
page 71)
On December 3, 2006, Morgan Stanley delivered its written
opinion to the LSI board of directors that, as of that date and
subject to the assumptions, considerations and limitations set
forth in its opinion, the exchange ratio provided for in the
merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to
LSI. Morgan Stanley provided its opinion for the information and
assistance of the LSI board of directors in connection with the
boards consideration of the merger. The Morgan Stanley
opinion is not a recommendation as to how any LSI stockholder
should vote or take any other action with respect to the
proposal to approve the issuance of shares of LSI common stock
in connection with the merger.
The full text of the written opinion of Morgan Stanley, which
sets forth assumptions made, matters considered and limitations
on the review undertaken in connection with its opinion, is
attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex B. Stockholders of LSI are urged to read the opinion
carefully and in its entirety. LSI stockholders should carefully
consider the discussion of Morgan Stanleys analysis in the
section entitled Opinion of LSI Financial Advisor
beginning on page 71 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Recommendation
of the Agere Board of Directors (see page 81)
After careful consideration, the Agere board of directors by
unanimous vote of the directors present determined that the
merger is advisable and in the best interests of Agere and its
stockholders, and approved the merger agreement. The Agere board
of directors recommends that the Agere stockholders vote
FOR the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. The
Agere board of directors also recommends that Agere stockholders
vote FOR each of the director nominees of Agere
listed under the heading Election of Agere
Directors, FOR the re-approval of Ageres
Short Term Incentive Plan and FOR the ratification
of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007.
Opinion
of Agere Financial Advisor Regarding the Merger (see
page 84)
On December 3, 2006, Goldman, Sachs & Co. rendered
its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed by delivery of its
written opinion, dated December 3, 2006, to Ageres
board of directors that, as of the date of its opinion and based
upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in the
opinion, the exchange ratio of 2.16 shares of LSI common
stock to be received for each share of Agere common stock
pursuant to the merger agreement was fair from a financial point
of view to the holders of shares of Agere common stock.
The full text of the written opinion of Goldman Sachs, dated
December 3, 2006, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached as
Annex C to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Goldman
Sachs provided its opinion for the information and assistance of
Ageres board of directors in connection with its
consideration of the merger. Goldman Sachs opinion is not
a recommendation as to how any holder of Agere common stock
should vote with respect to the merger. Pursuant to an
engagement letter between Agere and Goldman Sachs, Agere has
agreed to pay Goldman Sachs a transaction fee of approximately
$28 million, substantially all of which is payable upon
consummation of the merger.
2
Some
Agere Directors and Executive Officers Have Interests in the
Merger (see page 90)
Certain members of the Agere board of directors and certain of
Ageres executive officers have interests in the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement that may be
different than, or in addition to, the interests of Agere
stockholders generally. These interests include, among other
things, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Executive officers whose employment is terminated under certain
circumstances after the merger will be entitled to severance
benefits payable by Agere;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain executive officers hold stock options which will become
exercisable and restricted stock units which will vest if their
employment is terminated under certain circumstances on or after
adoption of the merger agreement by Agere stockholders (or, if
later, on receipt of necessary governmental agency consent);
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three directors from Ageres current board of directors
will be designated by Agere to serve on the board of directors
of the combined company after the effective time of the merger;
|
|
|
|
Certain of Ageres current executive officers will be
offered continued employment with the combined company after the
effective time of the merger;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain directors hold stock options which will become
exercisable upon adoption of the merger agreement by Agere
stockholders (or, if later, upon receipt of necessary
governmental agency consent); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and officers will be indemnified by the combined
company with respect to acts or omissions by them in their
capacities as such prior to the effective time of the merger.
|
The Agere board of directors was aware of these interests and
considered them, among other matters, in making its
recommendation. See The Merger Consideration
of the Merger by the Agere Board of Directors.
Share
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers of LSI (see
page 28)
At the close of business on the record date for the LSI special
meeting, directors and executive officers of LSI beneficially
owned and were entitled to vote approximately 1.8% of the shares
of LSI common stock outstanding on that date.
Share
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers of Agere (see page
40)
At the close of business on the record date for the Agere annual
meeting, directors and executive officers of Agere beneficially
owned and were entitled to vote less than 1% of the shares
of Agere common stock outstanding on that date.
Directors
and Certain Officers of LSI Following the Merger (see
page 93)
Effective upon closing of the merger, LSIs board of
directors will continue to consist of nine members, six of whom
will be designated by LSI and three of whom shall be designated
by Agere. Abhijit Talwalkar will serve as President and Chief
Executive Officer and Bryon Look will serve as Chief Financial
Officer following the merger. Although the exact composition of
the combined companys executive management team following
the merger was not finalized as of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, it is expected that Phil Brace, Phil
Bullinger, Jon Gibson, Andy Micallef, Umesh Padval, Jean Rankin,
Denis Regimbal, Jeff Richardson and Rudy Stroh will serve as
part of the combined companys post-merger executive
management team.
What is
Needed to Complete the Merger (see page 106)
Several conditions must be satisfied or waived before LSI and
Agere complete the merger, including those summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement by Agere stockholders;
|
|
|
|
approval by LSI stockholders of the issuance of shares of LSI
common stock in the merger;
|
|
|
|
no order of any court preventing the completion of the merger
shall be in effect;
|
|
|
|
receipt of antitrust approvals from the United States and any
other foreign antitrust regulators, except for foreign
approvals, which, if not obtained, would not have a material
adverse effect on LSI, Agere and their subsidiaries, taken as a
whole;
|
|
|
|
|
|
receipt of opinions by LSI and Agere from their respective tax
counsel that the merger will qualify as a
reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code;
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
accuracy of each partys respective representations and
warranties in the merger agreement, except as would not have a
material adverse effect;
|
|
|
|
material compliance by each party with its covenants in the
merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
absence of a material adverse effect on LSI or Agere,
respectively, from December 3, 2006 to the completion of
the merger.
|
LSI and
Agere Are Prohibited from Soliciting Other Offers (see
page 99)
The merger agreement contains detailed provisions that prohibit
LSI and Agere, and their officers, directors, affiliates,
advisors and representatives from taking any action to solicit
or engage in discussions or negotiations with any person or
group with respect to an acquisition proposal as defined in the
merger agreement, including:
|
|
|
|
|
an acquisition which would result in the person or group
acquiring more than 15% of a partys total outstanding
securities;
|
|
|
|
an acquisition which would result in the person or group
acquiring more than 50% of any class of equity securities of a
partys subsidiaries that generate or constitute 15% or
more of the net revenues, net income or assets of such party;
|
|
|
|
a sale or disposition by a party of assets that generate or
constitute 15% or more of the net revenues, net income or assets
of such party;
|
|
|
|
a merger or other business combination involving a party or
subsidiaries that generate or constitute 15% or more of the net
revenues, net income or net assets of such party;
|
|
|
|
|
|
any liquidation, dissolution, recapitalization or reorganization
involving a party or subsidiaries that generate or constitute
15% or more of the net revenues, net income or net assets of
such party; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
any combination of the transactions described above.
|
The merger agreement does not, however, prohibit either party
from considering a bona fide acquisition proposal from a third
party if specified conditions are met.
LSI and
Agere May Terminate the Merger Agreement Under Specified
Circumstances (see page 108)
Under circumstances specified in the merger agreement, either
LSI or Agere may terminate the merger agreement. These
circumstances generally include if:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger is not completed by May 15, 2007 (which date
will be extended to August 31, 2007 if the merger has not
been completed as a result of a failure to obtain required
antitrust approvals and all other conditions to closing have
been satisfied or waived on or prior to such time);
|
|
|
|
a final, non-appealable order of a court or any governmental
authority has the effect of permanently prohibiting completion
of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the required approval of the stockholders of LSI of the issuance
of shares of LSI common stock in the merger has not been
obtained at LSIs duly held special meeting;
|
|
|
|
the required approval of the stockholders of Agere to adopt the
merger agreement has not been obtained at Ageres duly held
annual meeting;
|
|
|
|
the board of directors of the other party takes any of the
actions in opposition to the merger described as a
triggering event in the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the other party breaches its representations, warranties or
covenants in the merger agreement such that its conditions to
completion of the merger regarding representations, warranties
or covenants would not be satisfied; or
|
|
|
|
the other party consents to termination.
|
LSI or
Agere May Pay a Termination Fee Under Specified Circumstances
(see page 109)
If the merger agreement is terminated, either LSI or Agere, in
specified circumstances, may be required to pay a termination
fee of $120 million to the other party.
4
The
Merger is Intended to Qualify as a Reorganization for United
States Federal Income Tax Purposes (see page 110)
The merger has been structured to qualify as a reorganization
for United States federal income tax purposes, and LSI and Agere
have each received the opinion of their respective counsel,
attached as exhibits 8.1 and 8.2 to the LSI registration
statement on
Form S-4
of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part,
regarding such qualification. Assuming the merger so qualifies,
Agere stockholders generally will not recognize gain or loss for
United States federal income tax purposes as a result of
receiving LSI common stock in exchange for their Agere common
stock pursuant to the merger, except with respect to cash
received instead of fractional shares of LSI common stock.
Stockholders of Agere should carefully read the discussion
setting forth such tax opinions in the section entitled
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of
the Merger beginning on page 110 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Further, stockholders of Agere are
encouraged to consult with a tax advisor because tax matters can
be complicated, and the tax consequences of the merger will
depend upon the specific situation of each stockholder.
Accounting
Treatment of the Merger (see page 112)
LSI will account for the merger under the purchase method of
accounting for business combinations.
LSI and
Agere Have Not Yet Obtained All Required Regulatory Approvals to
Complete the Merger (see page 112)
The merger is subject to certain antitrust laws. LSI and Agere
have made filings under applicable antitrust laws with the
United States Department of Justice and the United States
Federal Trade Commission, and the applicable waiting period
associated with such filings has expired. LSI and Agere are also
required to make, and have made, antitrust filings with
antitrust regulators in China and Germany. Under the merger
agreement, LSI and Agere are not obligated to complete the
merger until the applicable approvals have been received from
such foreign antitrust regulators where the failure to obtain
such foreign approvals would result in a material adverse effect
on LSI, Agere and their subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
LSI Will
List Shares of LSI Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange
(see page 112)
LSI will use all reasonable efforts to cause the shares of LSI
common stock to be issued in connection with the merger to be
authorized for listing on the New York Stock Exchange before the
completion of the merger, subject to official notice of issuance.
No
Appraisal Rights (see page 113)
Neither LSI stockholders nor Agere stockholders are entitled to
dissenters rights of appraisal for their shares under the
Delaware General Corporation Law in connection with the merger.
5
SUMMARY
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF LSI
The following table sets forth summary selected historical
consolidated financial data with respect to LSI as of the dates
and for the periods indicated. The historical consolidated
statement of operations data presented below for the nine months
ended October 1, 2006 and the historical consolidated
balance sheet data as of October 1, 2006 have been derived
from LSIs unaudited historical consolidated financial
statements which are incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. The historical consolidated
statement of operations data presented below for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, and the
historical consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 have been
derived from LSIs audited historical consolidated
financial statements, which are incorporated by reference into
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The historical
consolidated statement of operations data presented below for
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the
historical consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 have been derived from
LSIs audited historical consolidated financial statements,
which are not incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Stockholders of LSI and Agere should read the following summary
selected historical consolidated financial data together with
the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes
contained in LSIs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as the sections
of LSIs Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, all of
which are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The following summary selected historical
consolidated financial data may not be indicative of LSIs
future performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended Oct. 1,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003(2)
|
|
|
2002(3)
|
|
|
2001(4)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,458,497
|
|
|
$
|
1,919,250
|
|
|
$
|
1,700,164
|
|
|
$
|
1,693,070
|
|
|
$
|
1,816,938
|
|
|
$
|
1,784,923
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
628,230
|
|
|
$
|
832,436
|
|
|
$
|
735,608
|
|
|
$
|
677,205
|
|
|
$
|
648,716
|
|
|
$
|
413,927
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$
|
110,625
|
|
|
$
|
(5,623
|
)
|
|
$
|
(463,531
|
)
|
|
$
|
(308,547
|
)
|
|
$
|
(292,440
|
)
|
|
$
|
(991,955
|
)
|
Net income/(loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.79
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.84
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.79
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.84
|
)
|
Shares used in computing per share
amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
397,408
|
|
|
|
390,135
|
|
|
|
384,070
|
|
|
|
377,781
|
|
|
|
370,529
|
|
|
|
349,280
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
403,779
|
|
|
|
390,135
|
|
|
|
384,070
|
|
|
|
377,781
|
|
|
|
370,529
|
|
|
|
349,280
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At October 1,
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,978,910
|
|
|
$
|
2,796,066
|
|
|
$
|
2,874,001
|
|
|
$
|
3,447,901
|
|
|
$
|
4,012,736
|
|
|
$
|
4,525,077
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
$
|
742,228
|
|
|
$
|
742,769
|
|
|
$
|
396,280
|
|
|
$
|
391,251
|
|
|
$
|
390,679
|
|
|
$
|
509,985
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
781,846
|
|
|
$
|
865,606
|
|
|
$
|
1,241,217
|
|
|
$
|
1,335,806
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,803,978
|
|
|
$
|
1,627,950
|
|
|
$
|
1,618,046
|
|
|
$
|
2,042,450
|
|
|
$
|
2,300,355
|
|
|
$
|
2,479,885
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
On January 1, 2006, LSI adopted
SFAS 123-R
Share-Based Payments using the modified prospective
transition method. During the nine months ended October 1,
2006, LSI completed the sale of the Gresham, Oregon
semiconductor manufacturing facility to ON Semiconductor for
approximately $105.0 million in cash.
|
|
(2)
|
On January 1, 2003, LSI adopted SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Exit or Disposal Activities.
SFAS No. 146 has been applied to restructuring
activities initiated after December 31, 2002 and changes
the timing of when restructuring charges are recorded to the
date when the liabilities are incurred.
|
|
(3)
|
During 2002, LSI recorded $46 million in additional excess
inventory and related charges and $67 million in charges
for restructuring of operations and other items, net. LSI
adopted SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets on January 1, 2002, as a result of
which goodwill is no longer amortized.
|
|
(4)
|
During 2001, LSI recorded $211 million in additional excess
inventory and related charges, a $97 million in-process
research and development charge associated with the acquisitions
of C-Cube and AMI, which were effective on May 11, 2001 and
August 31, 2001, respectively. In addition, LSI recorded
charges of $220 million for restructuring of operations and
other items, net.
|
LSI
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On January 24, 2007, LSI issued an earnings release
reporting its unaudited financial results for the fourth quarter
ended December 31, 2006, a copy of which was furnished to
the SEC on Form 8-K on January 24, 2007. LSI reported
unaudited fourth quarter 2006 revenues of $524 million, a 3%
increase year-over-year compared to the $506 million reported in
the fourth quarter of 2005, and up 6% sequentially compared to
the $493 million reported in the third quarter of 2006. LSI
recorded full year 2006 unaudited revenues of
$1.98 billion, a 3% increase compared to $1.92 billion
in 2005. Fourth quarter 2006 unaudited net income was
$59 million or 14 cents per diluted share. The fourth
quarter 2006 results compared to fourth quarter 2005 net income
of $38 million or nine cents per diluted share. Fourth
quarter 2006 results compare to third quarter 2006 net income of
$44 million or 11 cents per diluted share.
Cash and short-term investments totaled $1.01 billion at
the end of the fourth quarter of 2006, with $272 million in
repayment of convertible notes completed during the quarter.
7
SUMMARY
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF
AGERE
The following table sets forth selected financial information
for Agere. The financial information for the years ended
September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, and as of
September 30, 2006 and 2005, has been derived from
Ageres audited financial statements, which are
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The financial information for the years
ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 and as of
September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 has been derived from
Ageres audited financial statements, which are not
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
The historical selected financial information may not be
indicative of Ageres future performance and should be read
in conjunction with the information contained in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 and the
consolidated financial statements and the related notes in
Item 8 of Ageres Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for its fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, all of which
are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005(2)
|
|
|
2004(2)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Statement of operations
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,570
|
|
|
$
|
1,676
|
|
|
$
|
1,912
|
|
|
$
|
1,839
|
|
|
$
|
1,923
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
|
$
|
664
|
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
|
$
|
579
|
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90
|
)
|
|
$
|
(371
|
)
|
|
$
|
(803
|
)
|
Basic and diluted income (loss)
per share:(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.90
|
)
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding basic (in thousands)
|
|
|
174,525
|
|
|
|
177,775
|
|
|
|
171,248
|
|
|
|
166,699
|
|
|
|
163,720
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding diluted (in thousands)
|
|
|
175,432
|
|
|
|
177,775
|
|
|
|
171,248
|
|
|
|
166,699
|
|
|
|
163,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005(2)
|
|
|
2004(2)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Balance sheet
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,497
|
|
|
$
|
1,881
|
|
|
$
|
2,272
|
|
|
$
|
2,388
|
|
|
$
|
2,864
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
|
$
|
451
|
|
|
$
|
486
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During fiscal 2006 Agere recorded a tax benefit of
$24 million as a result of a $66 million reduction in
its pension benefit obligations. This benefit was offset by a
$24 million tax charge recorded against the minimum pension
liability adjustment reflected in other comprehensive loss.
Also, the decrease in Ageres total assets reflects the
repurchase of 17,681,198 shares of Agere common stock for
$255 million of cash. On October 1, 2005, Agere adopted
SFAS 123-R
Share-Based Payments using the modified prospective
transition method. |
|
(2) |
|
During fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004 Agere recorded reversals of
tax and interest contingencies of $120 million and
$86 million, respectively, resulting from settlements of
certain prior year tax audits. The settlements relate to
Ageres tax sharing agreement with Lucent Technologies Inc.
and cover periods Agere operated as either a division of
AT&T Corp. or Lucent. In fiscal 2005, Agere also recorded a
reversal of $22 million for tax and interest contingencies
related to
non-U.S. income
tax. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
On May 27, 2005, Agere reclassified its Class A common
stock and Class B common stock into a new, single class of
common stock, and effected a
1-for-10
reverse stock split. The weighted average number of common
shares outstanding and income (loss) per share from continuing
operations on a historical basis were adjusted to give
retroactive effect to Ageres reverse stock split. Basic
income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing income
(loss) from continuing operations by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during |
8
|
|
|
|
|
the period. Diluted income (loss) per common share is calculated
by dividing income (loss) from continuing operations by the
adjusted outstanding shares for all dilutive potential common
shares outstanding. |
AGERE
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Financial
Results for First Quarter
On January 25, 2007, Agere Systems issued a news release
announcing its financial results for the quarter ended
December 31, 2006. For the quarter ending December 31,
2006, Agere reported revenue of $372 million and diluted
earnings per share of $0.09, compared to revenue of
$403 million and a diluted loss per share of $(0.11) for
the quarter ending December 31, 2005.
Pending
Litigation
On December 6, 2006, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications
USA Inc. filed a lawsuit in Wake County Superior Court in North
Carolina, alleging unfair and deceptive trade practices, fraud
and negligent misrepresentation in connection with Ageres
engagement with Sony Ericsson to develop a wireless data card
for personal computers. While Agere has not completed its review
of the matter, based on the information currently available,
Agere intends to contest this matter vigorously.
9
SELECTED
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
The selected unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated
financial data for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the
nine months ended October 1, 2006 gives effect to the
merger and is based on estimates and assumptions which are
preliminary. The selected unaudited pro forma combined condensed
statement of operations data gives effect to the merger as if it
had occurred on January 1, 2005. The selected unaudited pro
forma combined condensed balance sheet date gives effect to the
merger as if it had occurred on October 1, 2006. This data
is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended
to represent or be indicative of the consolidated results of
operations or financial condition of LSI that would have been
reported had the merger been completed as of either such date,
and should not be taken as representative of future consolidated
results of operations or financial condition of LSI.
This selected unaudited pro forma combined condensed
consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with
the summary selected historical consolidated financial data and
the unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes contained elsewhere
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the separate
historical consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes of LSI and Agere incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. See the section entitled Where
You Can Find More Information beginning on page 134
of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
October 1, 2006
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
Statement of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
2,640,049
|
|
|
$
|
3,595,613
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,204,945
|
|
|
|
1,414,824
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
20,222
|
|
|
|
(270,137
|
)
|
Income/(loss) from continuing
operations per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
Shares used in computing per share
amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
760,594
|
|
|
|
753,321
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
777,752
|
|
|
|
753,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
October 1, 2006
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,909,087
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,157,232
|
|
Long-term obligations
|
|
$
|
1,687,450
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
5,064,171
|
|
10
COMPARATIVE
HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA PER SHARE DATA
The following table presents comparative historical per share
data regarding the income/(loss) from continuing operations and
book value of each of LSI and Agere and unaudited combined pro
forma per share data after giving effect to the merger as a
purchase of Agere by LSI assuming the merger had been completed
on January 1, 2005. The following data assumes
2.16 shares of LSI common stock will be issued in exchange
for each share of Agere common stock in connection with the
merger and the assumption of Agere options and other equity
based awards based upon the same exchange ratio. This data has
been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the
summary selected historical consolidated financial data and
unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial
statements contained elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and the separate historical consolidated
financial statements of LSI and Agere and accompanying notes
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The unaudited pro forma per share data is
presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to
represent or be indicative of the consolidated results of
operations or financial condition of LSI that would have been
reported had the merger been completed as of the date presented,
and should not be taken as representative of future consolidated
results of operations or financial condition of LSI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
Historical
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
Equivalent of One
|
|
|
LSI
|
|
Agere(2)
|
|
Combined
|
|
Agere Share(1)
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing
operations per share-diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.78
|
)
|
Nine months ended October 1,
2006
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Book value per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
4.51
|
|
|
$
|
1.82
|
|
|
$
|
6.67
|
|
|
$
|
14.41
|
|
Outstanding shares (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2006
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The Pro Forma Equivalent of One Agere Share amounts were
calculated by multiplying the exchange ratio in the merger of
2.16 and the pro forma combined diluted income/(loss) from
continuing operations and book value per share, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
The historical Agere income/(loss) from continuing operations
per share diluted data is for the year ended September 30,
2005 and nine months ended June 30, 2006. The book value
per share is as of September 30, 2006 and the outstanding
shares are as of September 30, 2005 and September 30,
2006.
|
11
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE MARKET PRICE DATA
LSI common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol LSI. Agere common stock trades on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol AGR.
The following table shows the high and low sales prices per
share of LSI common stock and Agere common stock, each as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite transactions
tape on (1) December 1, 2006, the last full trading
day preceding public announcement that LSI and Agere had entered
into the merger agreement, and (2) February 2, 2007,
the last full trading day for which high and low sales prices
were available as of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
The table also includes the equivalent high and low sales prices
per share of Agere common stock on those dates. These equivalent
high and low sales prices per share reflect the fluctuating
value of LSI common stock that Agere stockholders would receive
in exchange for each share of Agere common stock if the merger
were completed on either of these dates, applying the exchange
ratio of 2.16 shares of LSI common stock for each share of
Agere common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent Price
|
|
|
|
LSI Common Stock
|
|
|
Agere Common Stock
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
December 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
10.70
|
|
|
$
|
10.37
|
|
|
$
|
17.96
|
|
|
$
|
17.40
|
|
|
$
|
23.11
|
|
|
$
|
22.40
|
|
February 2, 2007
|
|
$
|
9.51
|
|
|
$
|
9.27
|
|
|
$
|
20.39
|
|
|
$
|
19.87
|
|
|
$
|
20.54
|
|
|
$
|
20.02
|
|
The above table shows only historical comparisons. These
comparisons may not provide meaningful information to LSI
stockholders in determining whether to approve the issuance of
shares of LSI common stock in connection with the merger or to
Agere stockholders in determining whether to adopt the merger
agreement. LSI and Agere stockholders are urged to obtain
current market quotations for LSI and Agere common stock and to
review carefully the other information contained in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus or incorporated by reference into
this joint proxy statement/prospectus in considering whether to
approve the issuance of shares of LSI common stock in the merger
in the case of LSI stockholders, and whether to adopt the merger
agreement in the case of Agere stockholders. See the section
entitled Where You Can Find More Information
beginning on page 134 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
12
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This joint proxy statement/prospectus and the documents
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus contain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that
involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions, that,
if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause the
results of LSI and its consolidated subsidiaries, on the one
hand, or Agere and its consolidated subsidiaries, on the other
hand, to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. All statements other than
statements of historical fact are statements that could be
deemed forward-looking statements, including statements about
future financial and operating results; benefits of the
transaction to customers, stockholders and employees; potential
synergies and cost savings resulting from the transaction; the
ability of the combined company to drive growth and expand
customer and partner relationships and other statements
regarding the proposed transaction, and any statements regarding
future economic conditions or performance; any statements of
belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the
foregoing.
The following factors, among others, could cause actual results
to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking
statements: failure of LSI stockholders to approve the issuance
of shares of LSI common stock in the merger or the failure of
Agere stockholders to adopt the merger agreement; the challenges
and costs of closing, integrating, restructuring and achieving
anticipated synergies; the ability to retain key employees; and
other economic, business, competitive,
and/or
regulatory factors affecting the businesses of LSI and Agere
generally, including other risks that are described in the
section entitled Risk Factors, which follows on the
next page, and in the documents that are incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
If any of these risks or uncertainties materializes or any of
these assumptions proves incorrect, results of LSI, Agere and
the combined company could differ materially from the
expectations in these statements. LSI and Agere are not under
any obligation (and expressly disclaim any such obligation) to
update their respective forward-looking statements, except as
required by law.
13
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to the other information included or incorporated
by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including
the matters addressed under Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Information, LSI stockholders should
carefully consider the following risks before deciding whether
to vote for approval of the issuance of the shares of LSI common
stock in the merger and Agere stockholders should carefully
consider the following risks before deciding whether to vote for
adoption of the merger agreement. In addition, stockholders of
LSI and Agere should read and consider the risks associated with
each of the businesses of LSI and Agere because these risks will
relate to the combined company. Certain of these risks can be
found in LSIs annual report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, and in
LSIs quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended October 1, 2006, each of which is
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and in Ageres annual report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, which is
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. You should also consider the other
information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the
other documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Merger
Agere
stockholders will receive a fixed ratio of 2.16 shares of
LSI common stock for each share of Agere common stock regardless
of any changes in market value of Agere common stock or LSI
common stock before the completion of the merger.
Upon completion of the merger, each share of Agere common stock
will be converted into the right to receive 2.16 shares of
LSI common stock. There will be no adjustment to the exchange
ratio (except for adjustments to reflect the effect of any stock
split or other recapitalization of LSI common stock or Agere
common stock), and the parties do not have a right to terminate
the merger agreement based upon changes in the market price of
either LSI common stock or Agere common stock. Accordingly, the
dollar value of LSI common stock that Agere stockholders will
receive upon completion of the merger will depend upon the
market value of LSI common stock at the time of completion of
the merger, which may be different from, and lower than, the
closing price of LSI common stock on the last full trading day
preceding public announcement that LSI and Agere entered into
the merger agreement, the last full trading day prior to the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or the date of the
stockholder meetings. Moreover, completion of the merger may
occur some time after the requisite stockholder approvals have
been obtained. The market values of LSI common stock and Agere
common stock have varied since LSI and Agere entered into the
merger agreement and will continue to vary in the future due to
changes in the business, operations or prospects of LSI and
Agere, market assessments of the merger, regulatory
considerations, market and economic considerations, and other
factors both within and beyond the control of LSI and Agere.
The
issuance of shares of LSI common stock to Agere stockholders in
the merger will substantially reduce the percentage interests of
LSI stockholders.
If the merger is completed, LSI and Agere expect that
(i) approximately 365.8 million shares of LSI common
stock would be issued to Agere stockholders, (ii) upon
exercise of assumed equity awards, up to approximately
59.7 million shares will be issued to holders of assumed
options and restricted stock units and (iii) an additional
23.6 million shares will be issuable upon conversion of
Ageres outstanding convertible notes. Based on the number
of shares of LSI and Agere common stock outstanding on
January 31, 2007, Agere stockholders before the merger will
own, in the aggregate, approximately 48% of the fully diluted
shares of LSI common stock immediately after the merger,
excluding shares issuable upon conversion of Ageres
outstanding convertible notes. The issuance of shares of LSI
common stock to Agere stockholders in the merger and to holders
of assumed options and restricted stock units will cause a
significant reduction in the relative percentage interest of
current LSI stockholders in earnings, voting, liquidation value
and book and market value.
14
The
merger is subject to the receipt of consents and approvals from
government entities that may impose conditions that could have
an adverse effect on LSI or Agere or could cause abandonment of
the merger.
Completion of the merger is conditioned upon the expiration or
termination of the applicable waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, which has now
expired, and also the making of certain filings with and notices
to, and the receipt of consents, orders and approvals from,
various local, state, federal and foreign governmental entities.
Certain of these consents, orders and approvals will involve the
relevant governmental entitys consideration of the effect
of the merger on competition in various jurisdictions.
The reviewing authorities may not permit the merger at all or
may impose restrictions or conditions on the merger that may
seriously harm the combined company if the merger is completed.
These conditions could include a complete or partial license,
divestiture, spin-off or the holding separate of assets or
businesses. Either LSI or Agere may refuse to complete the
merger if restrictions or conditions are required by
governmental authorities that would materially adversely impact
the combined companys results of operations or the
benefits anticipated to be derived by the combined company. Any
delay in the completion of the merger could diminish the
anticipated benefits of the merger or result in additional
transaction costs, loss of revenue or other effects associated
with uncertainty about the transaction.
LSI and Agere also may agree to restrictions or conditions
imposed by antitrust authorities in order to obtain regulatory
approval, and these restrictions or conditions could harm the
combined companys operations. No additional stockholder
approvals are expected to be required for any decision by LSI or
Agere, after the annual meeting of Agere stockholders and the
special meeting of LSI stockholders, to agree to any terms and
conditions necessary to resolve any regulatory objections to the
merger.
In addition, during or after the statutory waiting periods, and
even after completion of the merger, governmental authorities
could seek to block or challenge the merger as they deem
necessary or desirable in the public interest. In addition, in
some jurisdictions, a competitor, customer or other third party
could initiate a private action under the antitrust laws
challenging or seeking to enjoin the merger, before or after it
is completed. LSI, Agere or the combined company may not
prevail, or may incur significant costs, in defending or
settling any action under antitrust laws. See The Merger
Agreement Conditions to Obligations to Complete the
Merger and The Merger Agreement
Regulatory Filings and Approvals Required to Complete the
Merger.
Any
delay in completing the merger may significantly reduce the
benefits expected to be obtained from the merger.
In addition to the required regulatory clearances and approvals,
the merger is subject to a number of other conditions beyond the
control of LSI and Agere that may prevent, delay or otherwise
materially adversely affect its completion. See The Merger
Agreement Conditions to Obligations to Complete the
Merger. LSI and Agere cannot predict whether and when
these other conditions will be satisfied. Further, the
requirements for obtaining the required clearances and approvals
could delay the completion of the merger for a significant
period of time or prevent it from occurring. Any delay in
completing the merger may significantly reduce the synergies and
other benefits that LSI and Agere expect to achieve if they
successfully complete the merger within the expected timeframe
and integrate their respective businesses.
Customer
uncertainties related to the merger could adversely affect the
businesses, revenues and gross margins of LSI, Agere and the
combined company.
In response to the announcement of the merger or due to ongoing
uncertainty about the merger, customers of LSI or Agere may
delay or defer purchasing decisions or elect to switch to other
suppliers. In particular, prospective customers could be
reluctant to purchase the products and services of LSI, Agere or
the combined company due to uncertainty about the direction of
the combined companys offerings and willingness to support
existing products. To the extent that the merger creates
uncertainty among those persons and organizations contemplating
purchases such that one large customer, or a significant group
of smaller customers, delays, defers or changes purchases in
connection with the planned merger, the revenues of LSI, Agere
or the combined company would be adversely affected. Customer
assurances may be made by LSI and Agere to address their
customers uncertainty about the direction of the combined
companys product and related support offerings, which may
result in additional
15
obligations of LSI, Agere or the combined company. In addition,
the announcement of the merger may cause prospective licensees
of Ageres intellectual property to delay or defer
licensing decisions resulting in a decline in Ageres
licensing revenues which could have a significant impact on the
profitability of Agere and the combined company. Quarterly
revenues and net earnings of LSI, Agere or the combined company
could be substantially below expectations of market analysts and
a decline in the companies respective stock prices could
result.
Certain
directors and executive officers of LSI and Agere have interests
in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the
interests of LSI stockholders and Agere
stockholders.
Executive officers of LSI and Agere negotiated the terms of the
merger agreement under the direction of the boards of directors
of LSI and Agere, respectively. The board of directors of LSI
approved the merger agreement and unanimously recommended that
LSI stockholders vote in favor of the issuance of shares of LSI
common stock in the merger, and the board of directors of Agere
by unanimous vote of the directors present approved the merger
agreement and recommended that Agere stockholders vote in favor
of the of the adoption of the merger agreement. These directors
and executive officers may have interests in the merger that are
different from, or in addition to or may be deemed to conflict
with, yours. These interests include the continued employment of
certain executive officers of LSI and Agere by the combined
company, the continued positions of certain directors of LSI and
Agere as directors of the combined company and the
indemnification of former LSI and Agere directors and officers
by the combined company. With respect to Agere directors and
executive officers, these interests also include the treatment
in the merger of employment agreements, severance policies,
restricted stock units, stock options and other rights held by
these directors and executive officers. LSI stockholders should
be aware of these interests when they consider the LSI board of
directors recommendation that LSI stockholders vote in
favor of the proposal to issue shares of LSI common stock in the
merger, and Agere stockholders should be aware of these
interests when they consider the Agere board of directors
recommendation that they vote in favor of the proposal to adopt
the merger agreement. For a discussion of the interests of
directors and executive officers in the merger, see The
Merger Interests of the Directors and Executive
Officers of Agere in the Merger.
Provisions
of the merger agreement may deter alternative business
combinations and could negatively impact the stock prices of LSI
and Agere if the merger agreement is terminated in certain
circumstances.
The merger agreement prohibits LSI and Agere from soliciting,
initiating, encouraging or facilitating certain alternative
acquisition proposals with any third party, subject to
exceptions set forth in the merger agreement. The merger
agreement also provides for the payment by LSI or Agere of a
termination fee of $120 million if the merger agreement is
terminated in certain circumstances in connection with a
competing third-party acquisition proposal for one of the
companies. See The Merger Agreement LSI and
Agere Are Prohibited from Soliciting Other Offers and
The Merger Agreement Termination; Fees and
Expenses. These provisions limit LSIs and
Ageres ability to pursue offers from third parties that
could result in greater value to the LSI stockholders or the
Agere stockholders, as the case may be. The obligation to pay
the termination fee also may discourage a third party from
pursuing an alternative acquisition proposal. If the merger is
terminated and LSI or Agere determine to seek another business
combination, neither LSI nor Agere can assure its stockholders
that they will be able to negotiate a transaction with another
company on terms comparable to the terms of the merger, or that
they will avoid incurrence of any fees associated with the
termination of the merger agreement.
In the event the merger is terminated by LSI or Agere in
circumstances that obligate either party to pay the termination
fee to the other party, including where either party terminates
the merger agreement because the other partys board of
directors withdraws its support of the merger, LSIs
and/or
Ageres stock prices may decline.
If the
proposed merger is not completed, LSI and Agere will have
incurred substantial costs that may adversely affect LSIs
and Ageres financial results and operations and the market
price of LSI and Agere common stock.
If the merger is not completed, the price of LSI common stock
and Agere common stock may decline to the extent that the
current market prices of LSI common stock and Agere common stock
reflect a market assumption that the merger will be completed.
In addition, LSI and Agere have incurred and will incur
substantial costs in connection with the proposed merger. These
costs are primarily associated with the fees of attorneys,
accountants
16
and LSIs and Ageres financial advisors. In addition,
LSI and Agere have each diverted significant management
resources in an effort to complete the merger and are each
subject to restrictions contained in the merger agreement on the
conduct of its business. If the merger is not completed, LSI and
Agere will have incurred significant costs, including the
diversion of management resources, for which each will have
received little or no benefit. Also, if the merger is not
completed under certain circumstances specified in the merger
agreement, LSI or Agere may be required to pay a termination fee
of $120 million. See The Merger Agreement
Termination; Fees and Expenses.
In addition, if the merger is not completed, LSI and Agere may
experience negative reactions from the financial markets and
LSIs and Ageres suppliers, customers and employees.
Each of these factors may adversely affect the trading price of
LSI and/or
Agere common stock and LSIs
and/or
Ageres financial results and operations.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Combined Company Following the
Merger
The
combined company may fail to realize the benefits expected from
the merger, which could adversely affect the value of LSIs
common stock.
The merger involves the integration of LSI and Agere, two
companies that have previously operated independently. LSI and
Agere entered into the merger agreement with the expectation
that, among other things, the merger would enable the combined
company to consolidate support functions, leverage its research
and development, patents and services across a larger base, and
integrate its workforce to create opportunities to achieve cost
savings and to become a stronger and more competitive company.
Although LSI and Agere expect significant benefits to result
from the merger, there can be no assurance that the combined
company will actually realize these or any other anticipated
benefits of the merger.
The value of LSIs common stock following completion of the
merger may be affected by the ability of the combined company to
achieve the benefits expected to result from the merger. LSI and
Agere currently operate in 20 countries, with a combined
workforce of approximately 9,100 employees. Achieving the
benefits of the merger will depend in part upon meeting the
challenges inherent in the successful combination and
integration of global business enterprises of the size and scope
of LSI and Agere. The challenges involved in this integration
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrating to customers of LSI and Agere that the merger will
not result in adverse changes to the ability of the combined
company to address the needs of customers or the loss of
attention or business focus;
|
|
|
|
Coordinating and integrating independent research and
development teams across technologies and product platforms to
enhance product development while reducing costs;
|
|
|
|
Combining product offerings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating and integrating corporate, information technology,
finance, and administrative infrastructures;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coordinating sales and marketing efforts to effectively position
the capabilities of the combined company and the direction of
product development; and
|
|
|
|
Minimizing the diversion of management attention from important
business objectives.
|
If the combined company does not successfully manage these
issues and the other challenges inherent in integrating
businesses of the size and complexity of LSI and Agere, then the
combined company may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the
merger and the revenues, expenses, operating results and
financial condition of the combined company could be materially
adversely effected. For example, goodwill and other intangible
assets could be determined to be impaired which could adversely
impact the companys financial results. The successful
integration of the LSI and Agere businesses is likely to require
significant management attention both before and after the
completion of the merger, and may divert the attention of
management from business and operational issues of LSI, Agere
and the combined company.
17
Uncertainties
associated with the merger may cause a loss of employees and may
otherwise materially adversely affect the businesses of LSI and
Agere, and the future business and operations of the combined
company.
The combined companys success after the merger will depend
in part upon the ability of the combined company to retain key
employees of LSI and Agere. In some of the fields in which LSI
and Agere operate, there are only a limited number of people in
the job market who possess the requisite skills. Each of LSI and
Agere has experienced difficulty in hiring and retaining
sufficient numbers of qualified engineers in parts of their
respective businesses. Current and prospective employees of LSI
and Agere may experience uncertainty about their post-merger
roles with the combined company following the merger. This may
materially adversely affect the ability of each of LSI and Agere
to attract and retain key management, sales, marketing,
technical and other personnel. In addition, key employees may
depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and
difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with the
combined company following the merger. The loss of services of
any key personnel or the inability to hire new personnel with
the requisite skills could restrict the ability of LSI, Agere
and the combined company to develop new products or enhance
existing products in a timely matter, to sell products to
customers or to manage the business of LSI, Agere and the
combined company effectively.
The
industries in which LSI and Agere operate are highly cyclical,
and operating results of the combined company may
fluctuate.
LSI and Agere operate in the highly cyclical semiconductor
device and storage systems industries. These industries are
characterized by wide fluctuations in product supply and demand.
In the past, the semiconductor industry has experienced
significant downturns, often in connection with, or in
anticipation of, excess manufacturing capacity worldwide,
maturing product cycles and declines in general economic
conditions. Even if demand for the products of LSI or Agere
remains constant after the completion of the merger, the
availability of additional excess production capacity in the
semiconductor industry may create competitive pressures that can
degrade pricing levels and reduce revenues of the combined
company.
General
economic weakness and geopolitical factors may harm the combined
companys operating results and financial
condition.
The results of operations of the combined company will be
dependent to a large extent upon the global economy.
Geopolitical factors such as terrorist activities, armed
conflict or global health conditions that adversely affect the
global economy may adversely affect the operating results and
financial condition of the combined company.
The
combined company will be dependent upon a limited number of
customers.
A limited number of customers will account for a substantial
portion of the combined companys revenues. For LSIs
most recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2005,
International Business Machines Corporation and Seagate
Technology represented approximately 16% and 11%, respectively,
of LSIs consolidated revenues. For Ageres most
recent fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, Seagate
Technology, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. represented
approximately 24% and 18%, respectively, of Ageres
revenues. If any of the key customers of LSI or Agere were to
decide to significantly reduce or cancel its existing business,
the operating results and the financial condition of the
combined company could be adversely affected. Because many of
the products of the combined company will have long product
design and development cycles, it may be difficult for the
combined company to replace key customers who reduce or cancel
existing business. In addition, the combined company may not
win new product designs from major existing customers, major
customers may make significant changes in scheduled deliveries,
or there may be declines in the prices of products sold to these
customers, and the business of the combined company may be
adversely affected if any of these events were to occur.
18
The
combined company will depend to a large extent upon independent
foundry subcontractors to manufacture its semiconductor
products; accordingly, any failure to secure and maintain
sufficient foundry capacity could materially and adversely
affect the combined companys business.
Since selling its Gresham, Oregon semiconductor manufacturing
facility in May 2006, LSI has relied entirely on independent
foundry subcontractors to manufacture its semiconductor
products. Agere owns an interest in a joint venture that
operates a semiconductor wafer manufacturing facility, but also
relies on independent foundry subcontractors to manufacture a
significant portion of its semiconductor products. Because the
combined company will rely on joint ventures and third party
manufacturing relationships, the combined company will face the
following risks:
|
|
|
|
|
a manufacturer may be unwilling to devote adequate capacity to
production of products for the combined company, or may be
unable to produce such products;
|
|
|
|
a manufacturer may not be able to develop manufacturing methods
appropriate for the products of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
manufacturing costs may be higher than planned;
|
|
|
|
product reliability may decline;
|
|
|
|
a manufacturer may not be able to maintain continuing
relationships with suppliers to the combined company; and
|
|
|
|
the combined company may have reduced control over delivery
schedules, quality, manufacturing yields and costs of products.
|
If any of these risks were to be realized, the combined company
could experience an interruption in supply or an increase in
costs, which could adversely affect results of operations.
The ability of an independent foundry subcontractor to provide
the combined company with semiconductor devices is limited by
its available capacity and existing obligations. Availability of
foundry capacity has in the recent past been reduced from time
to time due to strong demand. Although each of LSI and Agere
have entered into contractual commitments to supply specified
levels of products to certain of their respective customers,
neither LSI nor Agere have long-term volume purchase agreements
or significant guaranteed level of production capacity with any
of their third-party foundry suppliers. Foundry capacity may not
be available when needed at reasonable prices. Each of LSI and
Agere places orders on the basis of its customers purchase
orders or its forecast of customer demand, and the foundries can
allocate capacity to the production of other companies
products and reduce deliveries to LSI and Agere on short notice.
It is possible that other foundry customers that are larger and
better financed than the combined company, or that have
long-term agreements with the foundry suppliers, may induce
foundries to reallocate capacity to them. This reallocation
could impair the ability of the combined company to secure the
supply of components that they need. Also, the foundry suppliers
to LSI and Agere migrate capacity to newer,
state-of-the-art
manufacturing processes on a regular basis, which may create
capacity shortages for products designed to be manufactured on
older processes. In addition, the occurrence of a public health
emergency or natural disaster could further affect the
production capabilities of the combined companys
manufacturers by resulting in quarantines or closures. If any of
the foundry suppliers to the combined company experiences a
shortage in capacity, suffers any damage to its facilities due
to earthquakes or other natural disasters, experiences power
outages, encounters financial difficulties or experiences any
other disruption of foundry capacity, the combined company may
need to qualify an alternative foundry supplier, which may
require several months. As a result of all of these factors and
risks, neither LSI nor Agere can provide any assurances that any
foundries will be able to produce integrated circuits with
acceptable manufacturing yields, or that foundries will be able
to deliver enough semiconductor devices to the combined company
on a timely basis, or at reasonable prices.
The
combined company will operate in intensely competitive
markets.
Each of LSI and Agere derive significant revenue from the sale
of integrated circuits, and LSI also operates in the storage
systems segment. These industry segments are intensely
competitive and competition is expected to increase as existing
competitors enhance their product offerings and as new
participants enter the market. The
19
competitors of LSI and Agere include many large domestic and
foreign companies that have substantially greater financial,
technical and management resources than LSI or Agere. Several
major diversified electronics companies offer custom solutions
and/or other
standard products that are competitive with the products of LSI
and Agere. Other competitors are specialized, rapidly growing
companies that sell products into the same markets that LSI or
Agere target or that the combined company will target. Some of
the customers of LSI, Agere or the combined company may also
design and manufacture products that will compete with the
products of the combined company. Neither LSI nor Agere can
provide any assurances that the price and performance of their
products will be superior relative to the products of their
competitors.
Increased competition may negatively affect the pricing, margins
and revenues of the combined company. For example, competitors
with greater financial resources may be able to offer lower
prices than the combined company, or they may offer additional
products, services or other incentives that the combined
company may not be able to match. Competitors may be in a
stronger position than the combined company to respond quickly
to new technologies and may be able to undertake more extensive
marketing campaigns. They may also make strategic acquisitions
or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with
third parties to increase their ability to gain market share. In
addition, competitors may sell commercial quantities of products
before the combined company does so, establishing market share
and creating a market position that the combined company may not
be able to overcome once it introduces similar products in
commercial quantities.
The
combined companys target markets are characterized by
rapid technological change.
The industry segments in which each of LSI and Agere currently
operate, and in which the combined company will operate, are
characterized by rapid technological change, changes in customer
requirements, limited ability to accurately forecast future
customer orders, frequent new product introductions and
enhancements, short product cycles and evolving industry
standards. LSI and Agere believe that the combined
companys future success will depend, in part, upon its
ability to improve on existing technologies and to develop and
implement new ones, as well as upon its ability to adopt and
implement emerging industry standards in a timely manner and to
adapt products and processes to technological changes. If the
combined company is not able to successfully implement new
process technologies or to achieve volume production of new
products at acceptable yields, the operating results and
financial condition of the combined company may be adversely
affected. In addition, if the combined company fails to make
sufficient investments in research and development programs in
order to develop new and enhanced products and technologies, or
if it focuses on technologies that do not become widely adopted,
new technologies could render the current and planned products
of LSI, Agere and the combined company obsolete, resulting in
the need to change the focus of the combined companys
research and development and product strategies and disrupting
its business significantly.
In addition, the emergence of markets for integrated circuits
may be affected by factors beyond the control of LSI, Agere or
the combined company. In particular, products are designed to
conform to current specific industry standards. Customers of
LSI, Agere or the combined company may not adopt or continue to
follow these standards, which would make the combined
companys products less desirable to customers, and could
negatively affect sales. Also, competing standards may emerge
that are preferred by customers of LSI, Agere or the combined
company, which could reduce sales and require the combined
company to make significant expenditures to develop new
products. To the extent that the combined company is not able to
effectively and expeditiously adapt to new standards, the
business of the combined company may be negatively affected.
Order
or shipment cancellations or deferrals could cause the combined
companys revenue to decline or fluctuate.
Each of LSI and Agere sell, and the combined company is expected
to sell, a significant amount of products pursuant to purchase
orders that customers may cancel or defer on short notice
without incurring a significant penalty. Cancellations or
deferrals could cause the combined company to hold excess
inventory, which could adversely affect its results of
operations. If a customer cancels or defers product shipments or
refuses to accept shipped products, the combined company may
incur unanticipated reductions or delays in revenue. If a
customer does not pay for products in a timely manner, the
combined company could incur significant charges against income,
which could materially and adversely affect its results of
operations.
20
The
combined company will design and develop highly complex products
that will require significant investments.
The products of Agere and LSI are, and the products of the
combined company will be, highly complex and significant time
and expense are expected to be associated with the design,
development and manufacture of the products of the combined
company. The combined company is expected to incur substantial
research and development costs to confirm the technical
feasibility and commercial viability of products, which in the
end may not be successful.
The
combined companys products may contain
defects.
The products of LSI, Agere and the combined company may contain
undetected defects, errors or failures. These products can only
be fully tested when deployed in commercial applications and
other equipment. Consequently, customers may discover errors
after the products have been deployed. The occurrence of any
defects, errors or failures could result in:
|
|
|
|
|
cancellation of orders;
|
|
|
|
product returns, repairs or replacements;
|
|
|
|
|
|
diversion of resources of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
|
|
legal actions by customers or customers end users;
|
|
|
|
increased insurance costs; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
other losses to the combined company or to customers or end
users.
|
Any of these occurrences could also result in the loss of or
delay in market acceptance of products and loss of sales, which
could negatively affect the business and results of operations
of the combined company. As the combined companys products
become even more complex in the future, this risk may intensify
over time and may result in increased expenses.
The
manufacturing facilities of the combined company will have high
fixed costs and will involve highly complex and precise
processes.
Agere owns assembly and test facilities and has a joint venture
fabrication facility and LSI has a storage systems manufacturing
facility. Operations at these facilities may be disrupted for
reasons beyond the control of LSI, Agere or the combined
company, including work stoppages, supply shortages, fire,
earthquake, tornado, floods or other natural disasters, any of
which could have a material adverse effect on the results of
operations or financial position of the combined company. In
addition, if the combined company does not experience adequate
utilization of, or adequate yields at, its manufacturing
facilities, its results of operations may be adversely affected.
The manufacture of LSIs and Ageres products involves
highly complex and precise processes, requiring production in a
clean and tightly controlled environment. In addition, the
manufacture of integrated circuits is a highly complex and
technologically demanding process. Although each of LSI and
Agere work closely with its foundry suppliers to minimize the
likelihood of reduced manufacturing yields, such foundries have,
from time to time, experienced lower than anticipated
manufacturing yields. This often occurs during the production of
new products or the installation and
start-up of
new process technologies. Poor yields from the foundry suppliers
to the combined company could result in product shortages or
delays in product shipments, which could seriously harm
relationships with customers and materially and adversely affect
the business and results of operations of the combined company.
Failure
of the combined company to qualify products or its
suppliers manufacturing lines may adversely affect results
of operations.
Some customers will not purchase any products, other than
limited numbers of evaluation units, until they qualify the
manufacturing line for the product. The combined company may not
always be able to satisfy the qualification requirements of
these customers. Delays in qualification may cause a customer to
discontinue use of non-qualified products and result in a
significant loss of revenue.
21
The
combined company will depend to a certain extent upon
third-party subcontractors to assemble, obtain packaging
materials for and test certain products.
Third-party subcontractors located in Asia assemble, obtain
packaging materials for and test certain products of LSI.
Although Agere owns and operates its own semiconductor assembly
and test facilities, the combined company will continue to
depend upon third-party subcontractors to assemble and test some
of the combined companys semiconductor products or to
perform other services for the combined company. To the extent
that the combined company does rely upon third-party
subcontractors to perform these functions, it will not be able
to control directly product delivery schedules and quality
assurance. This lack of control may result in product shortages
or quality assurance problems that could delay shipments of
products or increase manufacturing, assembly, testing or other
costs. In addition, if these third-party subcontractors are
unable to obtain sufficient packaging materials for products in
a timely manner, the combined company may experience product
shortages or delays in product shipments, which could materially
and adversely affect customer relationships and results of
operations. If any of these subcontractors experiences capacity
constraints or financial difficulties, suffers any damage to its
facilities, experiences power outages or any other disruption of
assembly or testing capacity, the combined company may not be
able to obtain alternative assembly and testing services in a
timely manner. Due to the amount of time that it usually takes
to qualify assemblers and testers, the combined company could
experience significant delays in product shipments if it is
required to find alternative assemblers or testers for such
components.
A
widespread outbreak of an illness or other health issue could
negatively affect the combined companys manufacturing,
assembly and test, design or other operations.
A widespread outbreak of an illness such as avian influenza, or
bird flu, or severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, could
adversely affect the combined companys operations as well
as demand from customers. A number of countries in the
Asia/Pacific region have experienced outbreaks of bird flu
and/or SARS.
As a result of such an outbreak, businesses can be shut down
temporarily and individuals can become ill or quarantined. The
combined company will have operations in Singapore, Thailand and
China, countries where outbreaks of bird flu
and/or SARS
have occurred. If operations are curtailed because of health
issues, the combined company may need to seek alternate sources
of supply for manufacturing or other services and alternate
sources can be more expensive. Alternate sources may not be
available or may result in delays in shipments to customers
which would affect results of operations. In addition, a
curtailment of design operations could result in delays in the
development of new products. If customers businesses are
affected by health issues, they might delay or reduce purchases,
which could adversely affect results of operations.
The
combined company will procure parts and raw materials from a
limited number of domestic and foreign sources.
LSI does not maintain an extensive inventory of parts and
materials for manufacturing storage systems at its Wichita,
Kansas facility. LSI purchases, and expects that the combined
company will continue to purchase, a portion of its requirements
for parts and raw materials from a limited number of sources,
primarily from suppliers in Japan and their
U.S. subsidiaries, and obtain other material inputs on a
local basis. If the combined company has difficulty in obtaining
parts or materials in the future from their existing suppliers,
alternative suppliers may not be available, or suppliers may not
provide parts and materials in a timely manner or on favorable
terms. As a result, the combined company may be adversely
affected by delays in product shipments. If the combined company
cannot obtain adequate materials for manufacture of its
products, or if such materials are not available at reasonable
prices, there could be a material adverse impact on operating
results and financial condition.
If the
combined companys new product development and expansion
efforts are not successful, results of operations may be
adversely affected.
Each of LSI and Agere is currently developing, and LSI expects
that the combined company will continue to develop, products in
new areas and the combined company may seek to expand into
additional areas in the future. The efforts of the combined
company to develop products and expand into new areas may not
result in sales that are sufficient to recoup its investment,
and it may experience higher costs than anticipated. For
example, the combined company may not be able to manufacture
products at a competitive cost, may need to rely on new
suppliers or may
22
find that the development efforts are more costly or time
consuming than anticipated. Development of new products often
requires long-term forecasting of market trends, development and
implementation of new or changing technologies and a substantial
capital commitment. There can be no assurance that the products
that the combined company selects for investment of its
financial and engineering resources will be developed or
acquired in a timely manner or will enjoy market acceptance. In
addition, the combined companys products may support
protocols that are not widely adopted and it may have
difficulties entering markets where competitors have strong
market positions.
The
combined company may engage in acquisitions and alliances giving
rise to financial and technological risks.
The combined company may explore strategic acquisitions that
build upon or expand its library of intellectual property, human
capital and engineering talent, and increase its ability to
fully address the needs of its customers. For example, in
November 2006, LSI acquired StoreAge Networking Technologies
Ltd., a privately held software company based in Nesher, Israel,
for approximately $50 million in cash. Mergers and
acquisitions of high-technology companies bear inherent risks.
No assurance can be given that previous acquisitions of LSI or
Agere or future acquisitions by the combined company will be
successful and will not materially adversely affect the combined
companys business, operating results or financial
condition. Failure to manage growth effectively or to integrate
acquisitions could adversely affect the combined companys
operating results and financial condition.
In addition, the combined company may make investments in
companies, products and technologies through strategic alliances
and otherwise. Investment activities often involve risks,
including the need for timely access to needed capital for
investments and to invest in companies and technologies that
will contribute to the growth of the combined companys
business.
The
semiconductor industry is prone to intellectual property
litigation.
As is typical in the semiconductor industry, each of LSI and
Agere is frequently involved in disputes regarding patent and
other intellectual property rights. Each of LSI and Agere has in
the past received, and the combined company may in the future
receive, communications from third parties asserting that
certain of its products, processes or technologies infringe upon
their patent rights, copyrights, trademark rights or other
intellectual property rights, and the combined company may also
receive claims of potential infringement if it attempts to
license intellectual property to others. Defending these claims
may be costly and time consuming, and may divert the attention
of management and key personnel from other business issues.
Claims of intellectual property infringement also might require
the combined company to enter into costly royalty or license
agreements. The combined company may be unable to obtain royalty
or license agreements on acceptable terms. Resolution of whether
any of the products or intellectual property of the combined
company has infringed on valid rights held by others could have
a material adverse effect on results of operations or financial
position and may require material changes in production
processes and products.
The
combined company may not be able to adequately protect or
enforce its intellectual property rights, which could harm its
competitive position.
The combined companys success and future revenue growth
will depend, in part, on its ability to protect its intellectual
property. The combined company will primarily rely on patent,
copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as
nondisclosure agreements and other methods, to protect its
proprietary technologies and processes. It is possible that
competitors or other unauthorized third parties may obtain,
copy, use or disclose proprietary technologies and processes,
despite efforts by the combined company to protect its
proprietary technologies and processes. While the combined
company will hold a significant number of patents, there can be
no assurances that any additional patents will be issued. Even
if new patents are issued, the claims allowed may not be
sufficiently broad to protect the combined companys
technology. In addition, any of LSI or Ageres existing
patents, and any future patents issued to the combined company,
may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. As such, any
rights granted under these patents may not provide the combined
company with meaningful protection. LSI and Agere may not have,
and in the future the combined company may not have, foreign
patents or pending applications corresponding to its
U.S. patents and applications. Even if foreign patents are
granted, effective enforcement in
23
foreign countries may not be available. If the combined
companys patents do not adequately protect its technology,
competitors may be able to offer products similar to the
combined companys products. The combined companys
competitors may also be able to develop similar technology
independently or design around its patents. Some or all of
LSIs and Ageres patents have in the past been
licensed and likely will in the future be licensed to certain of
the combined companys competitors through cross-license
agreements.
A
decline in the revenue that the combined company expects to
derive from the licensing of its intellectual property could
have a significant impact on net income.
Agere generates significant revenue from, and the combined
company expects to generate significant revenue from, the
licensing of its intellectual property. The revenue generated
from the licensing of Ageres intellectual property has a
high gross margin compared to the revenue generated from the
sale of other products currently sold by Agere, and a decline in
this licensing revenue could have a significant impact on the
profitability of the combined company. The combined
companys licensing revenue is expected to come from a
limited number of transactions and the failure to complete one
or more transactions in a quarter could have a material adverse
impact on revenue and profitability.
The
combined company will conduct a significant amount of activity
outside of the United States, and will be exposed to legal,
business, political and economic risks associated with its
international operations.
Each of LSI and Agere derive, and it is expected that the
combined company will derive, a substantial portion of its
revenue from sales of products shipped to locations outside of
the United States. In addition, each of LSI and Agere
manufacture, and the combined company will manufacture, a
significant portion of its products outside of the United States
and will be dependent on
non-U.S. suppliers
for many parts and services. The combined company may also
pursue growth opportunities in sales, design and manufacturing
outside of the United States. Operations outside of the United
States are subject to a number of risks and potential costs that
could adversely affect revenue and results of operations,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
political, social and economic instability;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
exposure to different legal standards, particularly with respect
to intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
natural disasters and public health emergencies;
|
|
|
|
nationalization of business and blocking of cash flows;
|
|
|
|
trade and travel restrictions;
|
|
|
|
imposition of governmental controls and restrictions;
|
|
|
|
burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws;
|
|
|
|
import and export license requirements and restrictions;
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
foreign technical standards;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;
|
|
|
|
international trade disputes;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting receivables from foreign entities or
delayed revenue recognition; and
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences.
|
The
combined company may rely on the capital markets
and/or bank
markets to provide financing.
The combined company may rely on the capital markets
and/or bank
markets to provide financing for strategic acquisitions, capital
assets needed in manufacturing facilities and other general
corporate needs. As of
24
December 31, 2006, Agere had approximately
$362 million of convertible notes outstanding and LSI had
approximately $350 million of convertible notes
outstanding. The combined company may need to seek additional
equity financing or debt financing from time to time.
Historically, each of LSI and Agere has been able to access the
capital markets and the bank markets when deemed appropriate,
but the combined company may not be able to access these markets
in the future on acceptable terms. The availability of capital
in these markets may be affected by several factors, including
geopolitical risk, the interest rate environment and the
condition of the economy as a whole. Moreover, any future equity
or equity-linked financing may dilute the equity ownership of
existing shareholders. In addition, the operating performance,
capital structure and expected future performance of the
combined company will affect the combined companys ability
to raise capital. LSI and Agere believe that the combined
companys cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments
and expected future cash from operations will be sufficient to
fund its needs in the foreseeable future.
The
combined company will utilize indirect channels of distribution
over which it will have limited control.
Financial results could be adversely affected if the combined
companys relationships with resellers or distributors were
to deteriorate or if the financial condition of these resellers
or distributors were to decline. In addition, as the combined
companys business grows, there may be an increased
reliance on indirect channels of distribution. There can be no
assurance that the combined company will be successful in
maintaining or expanding these indirect channels of
distribution. This could result in the loss of certain sales
opportunities. Furthermore, the partial reliance on indirect
channels of distribution may reduce visibility with respect to
future business, thereby making it more difficult to accurately
forecast orders.
The
combined company may not be able to collect all of its accounts
receivable from customers.
A majority of the trade receivables of LSI and Agere have been,
and it is expected that a majority of the trade receivables of
the combined company will be, derived from sales of products to
large multinational computer, communication, networking, storage
and consumer electronics manufacturers. None of LSI, Agere or
the combined company can provide any assurances that its
accounts receivable balances will be paid on time or at all.
The
trading price of the combined companys stock may be
affected by factors different from those currently affecting the
prices of LSI and Agere common stock.
Upon completion of the merger, holders of Agere common stock
will become holders of the common stock of LSI. The results of
operations of the combined company, as well as the trading price
of LSIs common stock after the merger, may be affected by
factors different from those currently affecting Ageres
results of operations and the trading price of Ageres
common stock. For a discussion of the businesses of LSI and
Agere and of certain factors to consider in connection with
those businesses, see the documents incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and referred to under
Where You Can Find More Information.
The
price of the combined companys securities may be subject
to wide fluctuations.
The stock of both LSI and Agere has experienced substantial
price volatility, particularly as a result of quarterly
variations in results, the published expectations of analysts
and announcements by LSI, Agere and their respective
competitors, and the stock of LSI after completion of the merger
is likely to be subject to similar volatility. Many of the
markets from which the combined company expects to derive a
substantial portion of revenues are highly cyclical, and the
combined company may experience declines in its revenue that are
primarily related to industry conditions and not its products.
In addition, the stock market has experienced price and volume
fluctuations that have affected the market price of many
technology companies and that have often been unrelated to the
operating performance of such companies. The price of LSIs
securities may also be affected by general global, economic and
market conditions. While LSI and Agere cannot predict the
individual effect that these and other factors may have on the
price of the LSIs securities following completion of the
merger, these factors, either individually or in the aggregate,
could result in significant variations in LSIs stock price
during any given period of time. Fluctuations in LSIs
stock price after the completion of the merger may also affect
the price of outstanding convertible securities of Agere and
LSI, and the likelihood of the convertible securities being
converted into cash or equity. If LSIs stock price is
below the conversion price of the Agere or LSI convertible notes
on the date of maturity, they may not convert into equity and
LSI may be required to redeem the outstanding convertible
securities
25
for cash. However, in the event they do not convert to equity,
LSI and Agere believe that the combined companys cash
position and expected future operating cash flows will be
adequate to meet these obligations as they mature.
In the past, securities class action litigation often has been
brought against a company following periods of volatility in the
market price of its securities. Companies in technology
industries are particularly vulnerable to this kind of
litigation due to the high volatility of their stock prices.
Accordingly, the combined company may in the future be the
target of securities litigation. Any securities litigation could
result in substantial costs and could divert the attention and
resources of the combined companys management.
Future
changes in financial accounting standards or practices or
existing taxation rules or practices may cause adverse
unexpected fluctuations and affect reported results of
operations.
Financial accounting standards in the United States are
constantly under review and may be changed from time to time.
The combined company would be required to apply these changes.
Once implemented, these changes could result in material
fluctuations in the results of operations of the combined
company
and/or the
way in which such results of operations are reported. For
example, on January 1, 2006, LSI adopted SFAS 123-R.
In accordance with the modified prospective transition method,
LSI began recognizing compensation expense for all share-based
awards granted on or after January 1, 2006, plus unvested
awards granted prior to January 1, 2006. The adoption of
SFAS 123-R had a significant impact on LSIs operating
results as share-based compensation expense is charged directly
against reported earnings. Numerous judgments and estimates are
involved in the calculation of this expense and changes to those
estimates or different judgments could have a significant effect
on LSIs reported earnings.
Similarly, the combined company will be subject to taxation in
the United States and a number of foreign jurisdictions. Rates
of taxation, definitions of income, exclusions from income, and
other tax policies are subject to change over time. Changes in
tax laws in a jurisdiction in which the combined company has
reporting obligations could have a material impact on results of
operations.
The
combined company will face uncertainties related to the
effectiveness of internal controls.
Public companies in the United States are required to review
their internal controls over financial reporting under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. It should be
noted that any system of controls, however well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute,
assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In
addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon
certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events.
Because of these and other inherent limitations of control
systems, there can be no assurance that any design will achieve
its stated goal under all potential future conditions,
regardless of how remote.
Although each of LSIs and Ageres management has
determined, and each of their respective independent registered
public accounting firms have attested, that their respective
internal controls were effective as of as of the end of their
most recent fiscal years, there can be no assurance that the
integration of LSI and Agere, and their respective internal
control systems and procedures, will not result in or lead to a
future material weakness in the combined companys internal
controls, or that the combined company or its independent
registered public accounting firm will not identify a material
weakness in the combined companys internal controls in the
future. A material weakness in internal controls over financial
reporting would require management and the combined
companys independent public accounting firm to evaluate
its internal controls as ineffective. If internal controls over
financial reporting are not considered adequate, the combined
company may experience a loss of public confidence, which could
have an adverse effect on its business and stock price.
Internal
control deficiencies or weaknesses that are not yet identified
could emerge.
Over time the combined company may identify and correct
deficiencies or weaknesses in its internal controls and, where
and when appropriate, report on the identification and
correction of these deficiencies or weaknesses. However, the
internal control procedures can provide only reasonable, and not
absolute, assurance that deficiencies or weaknesses are
identified. Deficiencies or weaknesses that are not yet
identified by LSI or Agere could emerge and the identification
and correction of these deficiencies or weaknesses could have a
material impact on the results of operations for the combined
company.
26
THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF LSI STOCKHOLDERS
Date,
Time and Place
The LSI special meeting of LSI stockholders will be held at
10:00 a.m., local time, on March 29, 2007 at
1621 Barber Lane, Milpitas, California.
Check-in will begin at 9:30 a.m. and LSI stockholders
should allow ample time for the check-in procedures.
Item of
Business
At the LSI special meeting, LSI stockholders will be asked to
consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the issuance of
shares of LSI common stock in connection with the merger as more
fully described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. LSI
currently does not contemplate that any other matters will be
presented at the LSI special meeting.
Recommendation
of the LSI Board of Directors
After careful consideration, the LSI board of directors
unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable
and in the best interests of the LSI stockholders and has
unanimously approved the merger agreement. The LSI board of
directors recommends that the LSI stockholders vote
FOR the proposal to approve the issuance of shares
of LSI common stock in connection with the merger.
Admission
to the Special Meeting
Only LSI stockholders, including joint holders, as of the close
of business on February 2, 2007, and other persons holding
valid proxies for the special meeting are entitled to attend the
LSI special meeting. LSI stockholders and their proxies should
be prepared to present photo identification. In addition, LSI
stockholders who are record holders will have their ownership
verified against the list of record holders as of the record
date prior to being admitted to the meeting. LSI stockholders
who are not record holders but hold shares through a broker or
nominee (i.e., in street name) should provide proof of
beneficial ownership on the record date, such as their most
recent account statement prior to February 2, 2007, or
other similar evidence of ownership. Anyone who does not provide
photo identification or comply with the other procedures
outlined above upon request will not be admitted to the special
meeting.
Method of
Voting; Record Date; Stock Entitled to Vote; Quorum
LSI stockholders are being asked to vote both shares held
directly in their name as stockholders of record and any shares
they hold in street name as beneficial owners.
Shares held in street name are shares held in a
stock brokerage account or shares held by a bank or other
nominee.
The method of voting differs for shares held as a record holder
and shares held in street name. Record holders will receive
proxy cards. Holders of shares in street name will
receive voting instruction cards in order to instruct their
brokers or nominees how to vote.
Proxy cards and voting instruction cards are being solicited on
behalf of the LSI board of directors from LSI stockholders in
favor of the proposal to approve the issuance of shares of LSI
common stock in connection with the merger.
Stockholders may receive more than one set of voting materials,
including multiple copies of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and multiple proxy cards or voting
instruction cards. For example, stockholders who hold shares in
more than one brokerage account may receive a separate voting
instruction card for each brokerage account in which shares are
held. Stockholders of record whose shares are registered in more
than one name will receive more than one proxy card. In
addition, Agere is also soliciting votes for its annual meeting
and stockholders who own shares of both LSI and Agere will also
receive a proxy or voting instruction card from Agere. Please
note that a vote for the issuance of shares in connection with
the merger for the LSI special meeting will not constitute a
vote for the proposal to adopt the merger agreement for the
Agere special meeting, and vice versa. Therefore, the LSI board
of directors urges LSI stockholders to complete, sign, date and
return each proxy card and voting instruction card for the LSI
special meeting they receive.
27
Only stockholders of LSI at the close of business on
February 2, 2007, the record date for the LSI special
meeting, are entitled to receive notice of, and vote at, the LSI
special meeting. On the record date, approximately
404,235,335 shares of LSI common stock were issued and
outstanding. Stockholders of LSI common stock on the record date
are each entitled to one vote per share of LSI common stock on
the proposal to approve the issuance of shares of LSI common
stock in connection with the merger.
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to have a valid meeting of
LSI stockholders. A majority of the shares of LSI common stock
issued and outstanding and entitled to vote on the record date
must be present in person or by proxy at the LSI special meeting
in order for a quorum to be established.
Abstentions and broker non-votes count as present
for establishing the quorum described above. A broker
non-vote may occur on an item when a broker is not
permitted to vote on that item without instructions from the
beneficial owner of the shares. Shares held by LSI in its
treasury do not count toward the quorum.
Adjournment
and Postponement
LSIs bylaws provide that any adjournment or postponement
of the LSI special meeting may be made at any time by the
chairman of the meeting or a vote of stockholders holding a
majority of shares of LSI common stock represented at the LSI
special meeting, either in person or by proxy, whether or not a
quorum exists, without further notice other than by an
announcement made at the special meeting. LSIs bylaws also
provide that no matter may be brought before a special meeting
which is not stated in the notice of the special meeting.
Required
Vote
Under the applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange, the
issuance of shares of LSI common stock in connection with the
merger requires an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast at the LSI special meeting, provided that the total votes
cast on the proposal represent over 50% of all shares of LSI
common stock entitled to vote on the proposal.
Under the applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange,
brokers and other nominees are prohibited from giving a proxy to
vote their customers shares with respect to the proposal
to be voted on at the LSI special meeting in the absence of
instructions from their customers. For purposes of determining
whether LSI has received the affirmative vote of a majority of
the votes cast at the LSI special meeting, broker
non-votes and abstentions will not be considered
votes cast and will therefore have no effect on the outcome of
the proposal.
For purposes of determining whether the total votes cast
represent over 50% of all shares of LSI common stock entitled to
vote on the proposal, broker non-votes and
abstentions will be considered entitled to vote and will
therefore make it more difficult to meet this requirement.
Share
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers of LSI
At the close of business on the record date for the LSI special
meeting, directors and executive officers of LSI beneficially
owned and were entitled to vote approximately 1.8% of the shares
of LSI common stock outstanding on that date.
Voting
Procedures
Submitting
Proxies or Voting Instructions
Whether LSI stockholders hold shares of LSI common stock
directly as stockholders of record or in
street name, LSI stockholders may direct the
voting of their shares without attending the LSI special
meeting. LSI stockholders may vote by granting proxies or, for
shares held in street name, by submitting voting instructions to
their brokers or nominees.
Record holders of shares of LSI common stock may submit proxies
by completing, signing and dating their proxy cards for the LSI
special meeting and mailing them in the accompanying
pre-addressed envelopes. LSI stockholders who hold shares in
street name may vote by mail by completing, signing
and dating the voting instruction cards for the LSI special
meeting provided by their brokers or nominees and mailing them
in the accompanying pre-addressed envelopes.
28
If LSI stockholders of record do not include instructions on how
to vote their properly signed proxy cards for the LSI special
meeting, their shares will be voted FOR the proposal
to approve the issuance of shares of LSI common stock in
connection with the merger, and in the discretion of the proxy
holders on any other business that may properly come before the
LSI special meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
If LSI stockholders holding shares of LSI common stock in
street name do not provide voting instructions,
their shares will not be considered to be votes cast on the
proposal.
Stockholders of record of LSI common stock may also vote in
person at the LSI special meeting by submitting their proxy
cards or by filling out a ballot at the special meeting.
If shares of LSI common stock are held by LSI stockholders in
street name, those LSI stockholders may not vote
their shares in person at the LSI special meeting unless they
bring a signed proxy from the record holder giving them the
right to vote their shares and fill out a ballot at the special
meeting.
Revoking
Proxies or Voting Instructions
LSI stockholders may change their votes at any time prior to the
vote at the LSI special meeting. LSI stockholders of record may
change their votes by granting new proxies bearing a later date
(which automatically revoke the earlier proxies) or by attending
the LSI special meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the
LSI special meeting will not cause previously granted proxies to
be revoked, unless LSI stockholders specifically so request. For
shares held in street name, LSI stockholders may
change their votes by submitting new voting instructions to
their brokers or nominees or by attending the LSI special
meeting and voting in person, provided that they have obtained a
signed proxy from the record holder giving them the right to
vote their shares.
Proxy
Solicitation
LSI is soliciting proxies for the LSI special meeting from LSI
stockholders and Agere is soliciting proxies for the Agere
annual meeting from its stockholders. Each company will bear its
own fees and costs associated with printing and filing this
joint proxy statement/prospectus and the registration statement
on
Form S-4,
of which it forms a part, that has been filed by LSI with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Other than the costs shared with Agere, the cost of soliciting
proxies from LSI stockholders will be paid by LSI.
In addition to the mailing of these proxy materials, the
solicitation of proxies or votes may be made in person or by
telephone, facsimile, telegram or electronic means by LSIs
directors, officers and employees, who will not receive any
additional compensation for such solicitation activities.
LSI has retained Georgeson Inc. to assist it in the solicitation
of proxies.
Contact
for Questions and Assistance in Voting
Any LSI stockholder who has a question about the merger, the
issuance of shares in connection with the merger, or how to vote
or revoke a proxy, or who wishes to obtain additional copies of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus, should contact:
Georgeson Inc.
17 State Street, 10th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Toll Free:
(866) 783-6820
Banks and Brokerage Firms:
(212) 440-9800
If you need additional copies of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or voting materials, you should contact
Georgeson Inc. as described above or send an
e-mail to
investorrelations@lsi.com.
Other
Matters
LSI is not aware of any other business to be acted upon at the
LSI special meeting. LSIs bylaws also provide that no
matter may be brought before a special meeting which is not
stated in the notice of the special meeting. If, however, other
matters are properly brought before the LSI special meeting or
any adjournment or postponement of the LSI special meeting, the
persons named as proxy holders, Abhijit Y. Talwalkar, Bryon Look
and Andrew S. Hughes, will have discretion to act on those
matters, or to adjourn or postpone the LSI special meeting.
29
THE AGERE
ANNUAL MEETING
Date,
Time and Place of Annual Meeting
The Agere annual meeting is scheduled to be held at the Edward
Nash Theater at the Raritan Valley Community College, Route 28W
and Lamington Road, North Branch, New Jersey 08876, on
March 29, 2007, at 9:00 a.m., local time.
Agere will also webcast its annual meeting. Stockholders can
access the webcast at
http://www.agere.com/webcast.
Information on the Agere website, other than this joint
registration statement/prospectus and form of proxy, is not part
of the proxy soliciting materials.
Purpose
of Annual Meeting
The purpose of the annual meeting is to:
|
|
|
|
|
consider and vote on a proposal to adopt the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
elect three directors to serve until the next annual meeting of
stockholders and until their successors are elected and
qualified or until the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
re-approve the Short Term Incentive Plan;
|
|
|
|
ratify the Audit Committees selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007; and
|
|
|
|
transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof.
|
The Agere board of directors recommends that Agere
stockholders vote FOR the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement. For the reasons for this recommendation, see
The Merger Consideration of the Merger by the
Agere Board of Directors Recommendation of the Agere
Board of Directors. The Agere board of directors also
recommends that you vote FOR each of the director
nominees listed under the heading Election of Agere
Directors, FOR the re-approval of Ageres
Short Term Incentive Plan and FOR the ratification
of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007 at
the annual meeting.
Who Can
Vote at the Agere Annual Meeting
Only Agere stockholders of record at the close of business on
February 2, 2007, the record date for the Agere annual
meeting, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
Agere annual meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the
Agere annual meeting.
On the record date, there were 169,422,222 shares of common
stock outstanding. Each share of common stock is entitled to one
vote on each matter properly brought before the meeting. Shares
that are held in Ageres treasury are not considered
outstanding or entitled to vote at the Agere annual meeting.
In accordance with Delaware law, a list of stockholders entitled
to vote at the meeting will be available at the meeting, and for
10 days prior to the meeting, at 1110 American Parkway NE,
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18109, between the hours of 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., local time.
Agere stockholders will be admitted to the Agere annual meeting
beginning at 8:00 a.m., local time, on March 29, 2007.
You will need your admission ticket as well as a form of
personal identification to enter the meeting. The procedure for
obtaining an admission ticket depends on whether you are a
record holder of Agere stock or if your Agere shares
are held in street name. You are a record holder if
you hold your Agere shares in an account with Ageres
transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services, LLC, or if you
have an Agere stock certificate. Your Agere shares are held in
street name if you hold them in an account with a
bank, broker or other record holder.
If you are an Agere stockholder of record and received this
joint proxy statement/prospectus by mail, you will find an
admission ticket in the proxy materials that were sent to you.
If you are an Agere stockholder of
30
record and received an
e-mail
describing how to view this joint proxy statement/prospectus
over the Internet and want to attend the meeting in person,
please write to Agere Systems Inc., 1110 American Parkway NE,
Room 10A-301C,
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18109, Attention: Response Center, or
call
1-800-372-2447,
to obtain an admission ticket.
If your Agere shares are held in street name (in the name of a
bank, broker or other nominee) and you plan to attend the Agere
annual meeting, you can obtain an admission ticket in advance by
sending a written request, along with proof of ownership, such
as a recent bank or brokerage account statement, to Agere
Systems Inc., 1110 American Parkway NE,
Room 10A-301C,
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18109, Attention: Response Center.
If you plan to attend the Agere annual meeting, please retain
the admission ticket. The admission ticket will admit you to the
meeting. If you arrive at the meeting without an admission
ticket, Agere will admit you if it is able to verify that you
are an Agere stockholder.
Vote
Required for Approval
Quorum
The holders of shares possessing a majority of all the votes
that could be cast on every matter that is to be voted on must
be present, in person or by proxy, in order to transact business
at the meeting.
Required
Vote for Adoption of Merger Agreement
(Proposal 1)
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of Agere common stock is required to adopt
the merger agreement.
Required
Vote for Election of Directors (Proposal 2)
Directors will be elected by a plurality of votes cast. That is,
the nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be
elected.
Required
Vote for All Other Matters (Proposals 3 and
4)
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the common
stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to
vote at the Agere annual meeting is required to re-approve the
Short Term Incentive Plan and to ratify the Audit
Committees selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
Ageres independent registered public accounting firm for
fiscal 2007.
Effect
of Withheld Votes and Abstentions
All shares of Agere common stock represented at the Agere annual
meeting, but not voting, including abstentions and broker
non-votes, will be treated as present for purposes of
determining the presence or absence of a quorum for all matters
for consideration at the Agere annual meeting.
In the election of directors, Agere stockholders may withhold
their vote. Withheld votes will be excluded from the vote and
will have no effect on the outcome. Agere stockholders may vote
to abstain on each of the other proposals. If you
vote to abstain, or do not vote, it will have the
same effect as a vote against the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement. If you vote to abstain it will have the
same effect as a vote against the proposal to re-approve the
Agere Short Term Incentive Plan and the proposal to ratify the
selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007.
Broker non-votes, if any, will not be counted for
purposes of the proposal to
re-approve
the Agere Short-Term Incentive Plan or the proposal to ratify
the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007.
If Agere stockholders return a proxy but do not indicate how to
vote, the Agere common stock represented by such proxy will be
voted in favor of all matters for consideration at the Agere
annual meeting.
31
Adjournments
If a quorum is not present at the Agere annual meeting, the
meeting may be adjourned from time to time until a quorum is
present. In addition, adjournments of the Agere annual meeting
may be made for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies in
favor of the proposals. However, no proxy that is voted against
a proposal described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
will be voted in favor of adjournment of the Agere annual
meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies.
Proxies
and Voting Procedures
You can vote your shares by completing and returning a proxy
card or, if your shares are held in street name, a voting
instruction form. Most stockholders can also vote over the
Internet or by telephone. If Internet and telephone voting are
available to you, you can find voting instructions in the
materials accompanying this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at
11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on March 28, 2007.
Please be aware that if you vote over the Internet, you may
incur costs such as telephone and Internet access charges for
which you will be responsible. If you are a participant in
Ageres 401(k) plan, your voting instructions must be
received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on
March 26, 2007.
You can revoke your proxy (including an Internet or telephone
vote) at any time before it is exercised by timely delivery of a
properly executed, later-dated proxy or by voting in person at
the meeting.
The method by which you vote will in no way limit your right to
vote at the meeting if you later decide to attend in person. If
your shares are held in street name, you must obtain a proxy,
executed in your favor, from your broker or other holder of
record, to be able to vote at the meeting.
All shares entitled to vote and represented by properly
completed proxies received prior to the meeting and not revoked
will be voted at the meeting in accordance with your
instructions. If you return a signed proxy card without
indicating how your shares should be voted on a matter and do
not revoke your proxy, the shares represented by your proxy will
be voted as the Agere board of directors recommends and
therefore FOR the adoption of the merger agreement,
FOR each of the director nominees listed under the
heading Election of Agere Directors, FOR
the re-approval of Ageres Short Term Incentive Plan and
FOR the ratification of the selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007.
If you hold your shares through a broker, your shares may be
voted even if you do not vote or attend the annual meeting.
Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, member brokers
who do not receive instructions from beneficial owners will be
allowed to vote on (1) the proposal to ratify the Audit
Committees selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
Ageres independent registered public accounting firm for
fiscal 2007 and (2) the proposal to re-approve the Short
Term Incentive Plan. Broker non-votes, if any, will
have the same effect as votes cast against the proposal to adopt
the merger agreement.
If you hold shares through Ageres 401(k) plan and do not
vote, those shares will be voted in the same proportion as
shares in the plan that are voted by plan participants.
If any other matters are properly presented at the annual
meeting for consideration, including, among other things,
consideration of a motion to adjourn the meeting to another time
or place, the individuals named as proxies will have discretion
to vote on those matters according to their best judgment to the
same extent as the person delivering the proxy would be entitled
to vote. If the annual meeting is postponed or adjourned, your
proxy will remain valid and may be voted at the postponed or
adjourned meeting. You still will be able to revoke your proxy
until it is voted. At the date this joint proxy
statement/prospectus went to press, Agere did not know of any
matters to be presented at the annual meeting other than those
described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
32
Revoking
a Proxy
You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by
timely delivering a properly executed, later-dated proxy
(including by voting over the Internet or telephone) or by
voting by ballot at the Agere annual meeting. Simply attending
the Agere annual meeting without voting will not revoke your
proxy.
Shares Held
in Street Name
If your shares of Agere common stock are held in an account at a
broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote, you must
return your instructions to the broker, bank or other nominee.
If you own shares of Agere common stock through a broker, bank
or other nominee and attend and vote at the Agere annual
meeting, you should bring a letter from your broker, bank or
other nominee identifying you as the beneficial owner of such
shares of Agere common stock and authorizing you to vote.
Tabulation
of Votes
Agere has appointed IVS Associates, Inc. to serve as Inspector
of Election for the Agere annual meeting. Automatic Data
Processing, Inc. will independently tabulate affirmative and
negative votes and abstentions.
Dissenters
Rights of Appraisal
Holders of Agere common stock will not have any appraisal rights
under the Delaware General Corporation Law or under Ageres
certificate of incorporation in connection with the merger, and
neither Agere nor LSI will independently provide holders of
Agere common stock with any such rights.
How You
Can Reduce the Number of Copies of Our Proxy Materials You
Receive
The Securities and Exchange Commission has rules that permit us
to deliver a single copy of our proxy statement and annual
report on
Form 10-K
to stockholders sharing the same address. This process, called
householding, allows Agere to reduce the amount of material
printed and mail.
Agere has implemented householding for all stockholders who
share the same last name and address and, for shares held in
street name, where the shares are held through the
same nominee (that is, all accounts are at the same brokerage
firm), so that they are receiving only one copy of Ageres
proxy statement and annual report on
Form 10-K
per address. If you would like to receive a separate copy of
this years proxy statement and annual report on
Form 10-K,
please write to Agere Systems Inc., 1110 American Parkway NE,
Room 10A-301C,
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18109, Attention: Response Center, or
call at
1-800-372-2447.
If you share the same last name and address with other Agere
stockholders and would like to start or stop householding for
your account, you can call
1-800-542-1061
or write to Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood,
NY 11717, including your name, the name of your broker or other
holder of record and your account number(s). If you consent to
householding, your election will remain in effect until you
revoke it. If you revoke your consent, Agere will send you
separate copies of documents mailed at least 30 days after
receipt of your revocation.
If you would like to view future proxy statements and annual
reports over the Internet instead of receiving paper copies, you
can elect to do so either by voting at http://www.proxyvote.com
or by visiting
http://www.investordelivery.com.
Your election to view these documents over the Internet will
remain in effect until you revoke it. Please be aware that if
you choose to access these materials over the Internet, you may
incur costs such as telephone and Internet access charges for
which you will be responsible. If you choose to view future
proxy statements and annual reports over the Internet, next year
you will receive an
e-mail with
instructions on how to view those materials and vote.
Allowing Agere to household annual meeting materials or electing
to view them electronically will help save on the cost of
printing and distributing these materials.
33
Cost of
Proxy Distribution and Solicitation
Agere will pay the expenses of the preparation of the proxy
materials and the solicitation of proxies. Proxies may be
solicited on behalf Agere in person or by telephone,
e-mail,
facsimile or other electronic means by directors, officers or
employees of Agere, who will receive no additional compensation
for soliciting. Agere has engaged The Proxy Advisory Group, LLC
to assist in the solicitation of proxies and to provide related
informational support, for a fee of $20,000 plus reimbursement
of expenses. In accordance with the regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock
Exchange, Agere will reimburse brokerage firms and other
custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their expenses incurred
in sending proxies and proxy materials to beneficial owners of
Agere Systems stock.
Agere
Fiscal Year and Common Stock Reclassification
Ageres fiscal year begins on October 1 and ends on
September 30. References in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus to the year 2006 or fiscal 2006 with
respect to Agere refer to the
12-month
period from October 1, 2005 through September 30,
2006. In May 2005, Agere reclassified its Class A common
stock and Class B common stock into a new, single class of
common stock, and effected a
1-for-10
reverse stock split. Information regarding Agere in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus has been adjusted to reflect these
transactions.
34
GOVERNANCE
OF AGERE
Pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law and
Ageres by-laws, Ageres business, property and
affairs are managed by or under the direction of the Agere board
of directors. The Agere board of directors currently has eight
members.
The Agere board of directors has three standing committees:
|
|
|
|
|
The Audit Committee, the members of which are: Thomas P. Salice
(Chair), Richard S. Hill and Harold A. Wagner.
|
|
|
|
The Compensation Committee, the members of which are: Harold A.
Wagner (Chair), Arun Netravali, Thomas P. Salice and Rae F.
Sedel.
|
|
|
|
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, the members of
which are: Rae F. Sedel (Chair), Arun Netravali and Harold
A. Wagner.
|
The Agere board of directors has determined that all the
directors other than Mr. Clemmer, including those who serve
on these committees, are independent for purposes of
Section 303A of the Listed Company Manual of the New York
Stock Exchange, and that the members of the Audit Committee are
also independent for purposes of
Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The Agere board of directors based these determinations
primarily on a review of the responses of the directors and
executive officers to questions regarding employment and
compensation history, affiliations and family and other
relationships and on discussions with the directors. The Agere
board of directors also reviewed the relationships between Agere
and companies with which its directors are affiliated.
The Agere board of directors has adopted a charter for each of
the three standing committees and corporate governance
guidelines that address the
make-up and
functioning of the Agere board of directors. The Agere board of
directors has also adopted a code of conduct that applies to all
of its employees, officers and directors. Agere stockholders can
find links to these materials on the Agere website at:
http://www.agere.com/governance. Agere stockholders can also
obtain this information in print by writing to Agere Systems
Inc., 1110 American Parkway NE,
Room 10A-301C,
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18109, Attention: Response Center, or by
calling
1-800-372-2447.
During fiscal 2006, the Agere board of directors held twelve
meetings and the committees held a total of twenty-two meetings.
None of the directors attended fewer than 75% of the total
number of meetings of the Agere board of directors and
committees of the Agere board of directors of which he or she
was a member during fiscal 2006. At least quarterly, the
non-management directors meet in private session without members
of management. These sessions are presided over by the Chairman
of Ageres board of directors, Mr. Wagner. If Agere
stockholders would like to communicate directly with
Mr. Wagner or any of the other non-management directors,
follow the instructions set forth in the section below entitled
Communications with Directors.
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee focuses its efforts on the following three
areas:
|
|
|
|
|
The adequacy of Ageres internal controls and financial
reporting process and the integrity of its financial statements.
|
|
|
|
The performance of the internal auditors and the qualifications,
independence and performance of the independent auditors.
|
|
|
|
Ageres compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
|
The Audit Committee meets periodically with management to
consider the adequacy of Ageres internal controls and the
financial reporting process. It also discusses these matters
with Ageres independent auditors and with appropriate
company financial personnel. The committee reviews Ageres
financial statements and discusses them with management and the
independent auditors before those financial statements are filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The committee met
ten times in fiscal 2006.
35
The committee regularly meets privately with the independent
auditors, has the sole authority to retain and dismiss the
independent auditors and periodically reviews their performance
and independence from management. The independent auditors have
unrestricted access and report directly to the committee.
Audit Committee Financial Expert. The Agere
board of directors has determined that the Chairman of the
committee, Mr. Salice, is an audit committee
financial expert, as that term is defined in
Item 401(h) of
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In making this
determination, the Agere board of directors considered
Mr. Salices educational background and his business
experience, which is described below under Election of
Directors. The Agere board of directors has also
determined that Mr. Salice is independent for
purposes of Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange
Listed Company Manual and Section 10A(m)(3) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee
The responsibilities of the Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee include:
|
|
|
|
|
Identifying, evaluating and recommending to the Agere board of
directors, prospective nominees for Director.
|
|
|
|
Periodically reviewing Ageres corporate governance
guidelines.
|
|
|
|
Periodically reviewing the performance of the Agere board of
directors and its members and making recommendations to the
Agere board of directors concerning the number, function and
composition of the committees of the Agere board of directors.
|
|
|
|
Making recommendations to the Agere board of directors from time
to time as to matters of corporate governance.
|
The committee met five times in fiscal 2006.
The Agere board of directors believes that it should be
comprised of directors with varied, complementary backgrounds,
and that directors should, at a minimum, have expertise that may
be useful to the company. Directors should also possess the
highest personal and professional ethics and should be willing
and able to devote the required amount of time to company
business.
When considering candidates for director, the committee takes
into account a number of factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Whether the candidate has relevant business experience.
|
|
|
|
Judgment, skill, integrity and reputation.
|
|
|
|
Existing commitments to other businesses.
|
|
|
|
Independence from management.
|
|
|
|
Whether the candidates election would be consistent with
our corporate governance guidelines.
|
|
|
|
Potential conflicts of interest with other pursuits, including
any relationship between the candidate and any customer,
supplier or competitor of Agere.
|
|
|
|
Legal considerations such as antitrust issues.
|
|
|
|
Corporate governance background.
|
|
|
|
Financial and accounting background, to enable the committee to
determine whether the candidate would be suitable for Audit
Committee membership.
|
|
|
|
Executive compensation background, to enable the committee to
determine whether the candidate would be suitable for
Compensation Committee membership.
|
|
|
|
The size and composition of the existing board of directors.
|
36
The committee will consider candidates for director suggested by
stockholders applying the criteria for candidates described
above and considering the additional information referred to
below. Stockholders wishing to suggest a candidate for director
should write to the Corporate Secretary, at the address
indicated below, and include:
|
|
|
|
|
A statement that the writer is a stockholder and is proposing a
candidate for consideration by the committee.
|
|
|
|
The name of and contact information for the candidate.
|
|
|
|
A statement of the candidates business and educational
experience.
|
|
|
|
Information regarding each of the factors listed above, other
than the factor regarding board size and composition, sufficient
to enable the committee to evaluate the candidate.
|
|
|
|
Detailed information about any relationship or understanding
between the proposing stockholder and the candidate.
|
|
|
|
A statement that the candidate is willing to be considered and
willing to serve as a director if nominated and elected.
|
Before nominating a sitting director for re-election at an
annual meeting, the committee will also consider the
directors performance on the Agere board of directors.
When seeking candidates for director, the committee may solicit
suggestions from incumbent directors, management or others. In
fiscal 2006, the committee also retained an unaffiliated search
firm to identify additional director candidates and to provide
the committee background information on those candidates. After
conducting an initial evaluation of a candidate, the committee
will interview the candidate if it believes the candidate might
be suitable to be a director. The committee may also ask the
candidate to meet with management. If the committee believes a
candidate would be a valuable addition to the Agere board of
directors, it will recommend to the full board that
candidates election.
This year, Mr. Mancuso, who was appointed a director by the
Agere board of directors in July 2006 and Mr. Wilska, who
was appointed a director by the Agere board of directors in
December 2005, are standing for election by the stockholders for
the first time. Mr. Mancuso was recommended to the Agere
board of directors by an executive search firm that the
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee had retained to help
it identify individuals whose skills and experience might make
them valuable additions to the Agere board of directors. The
Nominating/Corporate Governance committee believed that the
Agere board of directors would benefit from
Mr. Mancusos experience as the chief financial
officer of a public company. Mr. Wilska was recommended to
the Agere board of directors by a non-management director, who
believed that the Agere board of directors would benefit from
Mr. Wilskas experience in the mobile phone industry.
Under Ageres by-laws, nominations for Director may be made
only by or at the direction of the Agere board of directors, or
by a stockholder of record at the time of giving notice who is
entitled to vote and delivers written notice along with the
additional information and materials required by the by-laws to
Ageres Corporate Secretary not less than 45 days nor
more than 75 days prior to the first anniversary of the
record date for the preceding years annual meeting. For
the annual meeting in the year 2008, in the event the merger is
not completed, Agere must receive this notice on or after
November 19, 2007, and on or before December 19, 2007.
Agere stockholders can obtain a copy of the full text of the
by-law provision by writing to Ageres Corporate Secretary,
1110 American Parkway NE, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18109.
Compensation
Committee
The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting executive
officer compensation, for making recommendations to the full
Agere board of directors concerning director compensation and
for general oversight for the compensation and benefit programs
for other employees. The committee met seven times in fiscal
2006.
Compensation
of Directors
Each of Ageres outside directors, that is, any director
who is not an employee of Agere, receives annually a retainer of
$45,000 and an option to purchase 10,000 shares of Agere
common stock. Each new outside director receives an option to
purchase 10,000 shares of Agere common stock when first
elected to the Agere board of
37
directors. The exercise price per share for these options, which
are granted under our Non-Employee Director Stock Plan, is the
fair market value of a share on the date of grant. Options
granted under the plan generally have a seven-year term and
become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
Agere also provides outside directors with travel accident
insurance when on company business.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The members of the Compensation Committee in fiscal 2006 were
Richard S. Hill (through January 2006), Arun Netravali (from
January 2006), Thomas P. Salice, Rae F. Sedel and Harold A.
Wagner. None of the members has ever been an officer or employee
of Agere or any of its subsidiaries, and no compensation
committee interlocks existed during fiscal 2006.
Communications
with Directors
Individuals who want to communicate with the Agere board of
directors or any individual director can write to:
Agere
Systems Inc.
Board Administration
Room 4U-541
400 Connell Drive
Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922
Your letter should indicate that you are an Agere stockholder.
The Corporate Secretarys office will review each letter.
Depending on the subject matter, that office will:
|
|
|
|
|
Forward the communication to the director or directors to whom
it is addressed;
|
|
|
|
Attempt to handle the inquiry directly, without forwarding it,
for example where it is a request for information about Agere or
it is a stock-related matter; or
|
|
|
|
Not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in
nature or if it relates to an improper or irrelevant topic.
|
At each Agere board meeting, the Corporate Secretary presents a
summary of all communications received since the last meeting
that were not forwarded and makes those communications available
to the directors on request. The Agere board of directors has
approved this process.
Director
Attendance at Annual Meetings
We typically schedule an Agere board meeting in conjunction with
the Agere annual meeting and expect that Ageres directors
will attend absent a valid reason, such as a schedule conflict.
Last year, all of the individuals then serving as directors,
other than Mr. Wilska, attended Ageres annual
meeting. Mr. Wilska had recently joined Ageres Board
and had a pre-existing conflict.
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Agere believes that, under the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules for reporting of securities transactions
by executive officers, directors and beneficial owners of more
than 10% of our common stock, all required reports for fiscal
2006 were timely filed.
38
BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP OF AGERE COMMON STOCK
Beneficial
Owners of More Than 5% of Agere Common Stock
The following table sets forth information concerning the
beneficial ownership of Agere common stock for each person or
group of persons known to Agere, as of January 31, 2007,
that beneficially owned more than 5% the shares of Agere common
stock. The information below is based on public filings made
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These filings
contain information as of particular dates and may not reflect
current holdings of Agere common stock. To Ageres
knowledge, other than as described below, the named person or
group of persons has sole voting and investment power with
respect to these securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Percent of Class(1)
|
|
Capital Research and Management
Company
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
|
|
|
9,267,920
|
(2)
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Brandes Investment Partners,
L.P.
11988 El Camino Real, Suite 500
San Diego, CA 92130
|
|
|
13,035,919
|
(3)
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Percentage of ownership was determined by dividing (i) the
number of shares shown in the table by (ii) 169,332,730,
the number of shares of Agere common stock outstanding as of
January 31, 2007, unless otherwise indicated. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G Information Statement amendment
filed by Capital Research and Management (Capital Research) on
February 14, 2006. Such Schedule discloses that
(i) Capital Research has sole voting power with respect to
1,432,600 shares of common stock, and has sole dispositive
power with respect to 9,267,920 shares of common stock and
does not have shared voting power or dispositive power with
respect to any shares, and (ii) Capital Research disclaims
beneficial ownership with respect to all such shares. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G Information Statement filed by
Brandes Investment Partners, L.P., Brandes Investment Partners,
Inc., Brandes Worldwide Holdings, L.P., Charles H. Brandes,
Glenn R. Carlson and Jeffrey A. Busby (Brandes) on
February 14, 2006. Such Schedule discloses that
(i) Brandes has shared voting power with respect to
11,205,972 shares of common stock, and has shared
dispositive power with respect to 13,035,919 shares of
common stock and does not have sole voting or dispositive powers
over any shares, and (ii) Brandes Investment Partners,
Inc., Charles H. Brandes, Glenn R. Carlson and Jeffrey A. Busby
disclaim direct ownership of such shares, except for an amount
that is substantially less than one percent of such shares, and
Brandes Worldwide Holdings, L.P. disclaims direct ownership of
such shares. |
39
Security
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information concerning the
beneficial ownership of Agere common stock as of
January 31, 2007 for Agere directors, the individuals named
in the Summary Compensation Table and the directors and
executive officers as a group. To Ageres knowledge, except
as otherwise noted, the named individual had sole voting and
investment power with respect to these securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Name
|
|
Owned(1)(2)
|
|
|
Richard L. Clemmer
|
|
|
158,204
|
|
Richard S. Hill
|
|
|
21,000(3
|
)
|
Michael J. Mancuso
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
Arun Netravali
|
|
|
19,782
|
|
Thomas P. Salice
|
|
|
51,859(4
|
)
|
Rae F. Sedel
|
|
|
28,747
|
|
Harold A. Wagner
|
|
|
42,500
|
|
Kari-Pekka Wilska
|
|
|
|
|
John T. Dickson
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Kelly
|
|
|
375,564
|
|
Denis P. Regimbal
|
|
|
163,991
|
|
Samir F. Samhouri
|
|
|
104,374
|
|
Ruediger Stroh
|
|
|
66,843
|
|
Andrew Micallef
|
|
|
131,315
|
|
Jean F. Rankin
|
|
|
248,860
|
|
Directors and executive officers
as a group (15 persons)
|
|
|
1,419,639
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No individual director, executive officer or other individual
identified above owned more than 1% of our outstanding common
stock as of January 31, 2007. As of that date, the
directors and executive officers as a group beneficially owned
less than 1% of our outstanding common stock. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes beneficial ownership of the following numbers of shares
of Agere common stock that may be acquired within 60 days
of January 31, 2007 pursuant to stock options awarded under
Agere stock plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of Shares
|
|
|
Mr. Clemmer
|
|
|
139,000
|
|
Mr. Hill
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
Mr. Netravali
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
Mr. Salice
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
Ms. Sedel
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
Mr. Wagner
|
|
|
37,000
|
|
Mr. Kelly
|
|
|
358,479
|
|
Mr. Regimbal
|
|
|
156,875
|
|
Mr. Samhouri
|
|
|
105,756
|
|
Mr. Stroh
|
|
|
66,666
|
|
Mr. Micallef
|
|
|
128,989
|
|
Ms. Rankin
|
|
|
243,215
|
|
Directors and executive officers
as a group (15 persons)
|
|
|
1,322,980
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
On February 1, 2007, Mr. Hill exercised stock options
in respect of 13,000 of such shares which were concurrently sold. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes 27,043 shares held jointly and over which
Mr. Salice shares voting and investment power with his
spouse, and 3,816 shares held by a charitable trust and
over which Mr. Salice shares voting and investment power
with his spouse as trustees. |
40
PROPOSAL 1.
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT AND THE MERGER
As discussed elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
Agere stockholders are considering and voting to adopt the
merger agreement. Agere stockholders should read carefully this
joint proxy statement/prospectus in its entirety for more
detailed information concerning the merger agreement and the
merger. In particular, Agere stockholders are directed to the
merger agreement which is attached as Annex A to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
The Agere board of directors recommends a
vote FOR the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement.
41
PROPOSAL 2.
ELECTION
OF AGERE DIRECTORS
The Agere board of directors is divided into three classes. One
class is elected each year for a term of three years.
Three directors will be elected at the annual meeting of
stockholders and until their successors are elected and
qualified for a three-year term expiring at the Agere annual
meeting in 2010 or until the consummation of the merger. The
Agere board of directors has nominated Richard L. Clemmer,
Michael J. Mancuso and Kari-Pekka Wilska for the positions.
Agere stockholders can find information about
Messrs. Clemmer, Mancuso and Wilska below. Upon
consummation of the merger, each of the directors of Agere will
be replaced by the directors of Atlas Acquisition Corp. as the
board of directors of the surviving corporation.
The persons named in the Agere proxy card will vote such proxy
for the election of Messrs. Clemmer, Mancuso and Wilska,
unless you indicate that your vote should be withheld. If
elected, Messrs. Clemmer, Mancuso and Wilska will each
continue in office until his successor has been duly elected and
qualified, or until the earliest of his death, resignation or
retirement. Messrs. Clemmer, Mancuso and Wilska have each
indicated to the company that he will serve if elected. Agere
does not anticipate that any of the nominees will be unable to
stand for election, but, if that happens, your proxy will be
voted in favor of another person nominated by the Agere board of
directors.
The Agere board of directors recommends a
vote FOR the election of Messrs. Clemmer,
Mancuso and Wilska as Agere directors.
Nominees
for Terms Expiring in 2010
Richard L. Clemmer, Director since October
2002. Mr. Clemmer has been Ageres
President and Chief Executive Officer since October 2005.
Mr. Clemmer has over 30 years of experience in the
technology industry, where he has held a variety of executive,
financial and management positions. Between June 2004 and
October 2005, he was an active partner at Shelter Capital
Partners, a private investment fund. Between 2003 and October
2005, he was Chairman and President of Venture Capital
Technology LLC, which was focused on investing in and consulting
for technology companies, primarily involved as Chairman of uNav
Microelectronics, an emerging global positioning systems chipset
company. Between May 2001 and January 2003, he was on the board
of directors and served as an executive at PurchasePro.com,
Inc., a provider of electronic procurement and strategic
sourcing solutions. Between 1996 and May 2001, Mr. Clemmer
was Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of Quantum Corp., which was a provider of hard disk
drives and other storage solutions. Prior to Quantum,
Mr. Clemmer served at Texas Instruments Incorporated for
over 20 years, including between 1988 and 1996 as Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Texas Instruments
Incorporateds Semiconductor Group. Mr. Clemmer is a
director of i2 Technologies, Inc. Age: 54.
In September 2002, while Mr. Clemmer was Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of PurchasePro,
having been asked to take over from prior management,
PurchasePro filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of
the United States Bankruptcy Code in connection with an
agreement to sell substantially all of its assets.
Michael J. Mancuso, Director since July
2006. From 1994 to 2006, Mr. Mancuso was
chief financial officer of General Dynamics, a supplier of
business aviation and aircraft services, land and amphibious
combat systems and shipbuilding and marine systems. Prior to
joining General Dynamics in 1993, he was vice president and
controller of United Technologies Corporations Pratt and
Whitney Commercial Engine business unit. He also served
21 years with General Electric in various financial
management positions. Mr. Mancuso is a director of SPX
Corporation and The Shaw Group. Age: 64.
Kari-Pekka Wilska, Director since December
2005. Since October 2005, Mr. Wilska has
been a partner at Austin Ventures, a venture capital firm. Prior
to joining Austin Ventures, Mr. Wilska was President of
Vertu Ltd., a subsidiary of Nokia Corporation and a provider of
luxury mobile phones. From 1993 to 2004, Mr. Wilska held a
variety of leadership positions in Nokias U.S. mobile
phone operations. Mr. Wilska is also a director of
Brightpoint, Inc. and Mavenir Systems. Age: 59.
42
Directors
Whose Terms Will Expire in 2008
Richard S. Hill, Director since July
2003. Mr. Hill has been Chief Executive
Officer and a director of Novellus Systems, Inc., a supplier of
integrated circuit manufacturing equipment, since 1993 and has
been Chairman of its board of directors since 1996. Before
joining Novellus, Mr. Hill spent 12 years at
Tektronix, Inc., where he held a variety of positions, including
President of Tektronix Development Company, Vice President of
the Test and Measurement Group and President of Tektronix
Components Corporation. Prior to joining Tektronix, he held
engineering management and engineering positions at General
Electric, Motorola and Hughes Aircraft Company. Mr. Hill is
a director of Arrow Electronics, Inc. and the University of
Illinois Foundation. Age: 54.
Arun Netravali, Director since July
2004. Since November 2004, Mr. Netravali has
been managing partner of OmniCapital Group LLC, a venture
capital firm. From January 2002 to April 2003,
Mr. Netravali was Chief Scientist for Lucent Technologies
Inc., a provider of services, systems and software for
communications networks, working with academic and investment
communities to identify and implement new networking
technologies. From 1999 to January 2002, Mr. Netravali was
President of Bell Labs as well as Lucents Chief Technology
Officer and Chief Network Architect. Mr. Netravali
currently serves on the board of Level 3 Communications
Inc. and on the advisory board of Veridicom International Inc.
Age: 60.
Harold A. Wagner, Director since March 2001 and Chairman of
the Agere board of directors since December
2001. In December 2000, Mr. Wagner retired
from his position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Air
Products and Chemicals, Inc., a multi-national chemicals
manufacturing company, a position he had held since 1998. From
1992 to 1998, Mr. Wagner served as Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Air Products and Chemicals. He is
also a director of CIGNA Corporation, United Technologies
Corporation and PACCAR Inc. He is a trustee of the Eisenhower
Exchange Fellowships, Inc. and is a member of the Business
Advisory Committee of A.P. Møller. Age: 71.
Directors
Whose Terms Will Expire in 2009
Thomas P. Salice, Director since July
2003. Mr. Salice is a co-founder and has
been a managing member of SFW Capital Partners, LLC, a private
equity firm, since January 2005. Prior to his current position,
he served as Vice Chairman of AEA Investors LLC, a private
equity firm, and had served at AEA Investors since 1989.
Mr. Salice is a director of Mettler-Toledo International
Inc. and Waters Corporation and is a trustee of Fordham
University. Age: 47.
Rae F. Sedel, Director since March
2001. Ms. Sedel has been a Managing Director
since 1987, and a member of the board of directors since October
2005, of Russell Reynolds Associates, Inc., an executive
recruiting firm. From 1991 until October 2005, she was the lead
partner on sector verticals and, from 1991 until December 2004,
she was head of the technology sector at Russell Reynolds.
Before joining Russell Reynolds, Ms. Sedel spent fifteen
years with Pacific Telesis Group, where she was Vice
President-Consumer Markets. Age: 57.
43
PROPOSAL 3.
RE-APPROVAL
OF THE AGERE SYSTEMS INC.
SHORT
TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
Agere is asking its stockholders to re-approve the Short Term
Incentive Plan to preserve the federal income tax deduction for
compensation it pays to its chief executive officer and the four
other most highly compensated executive officers. These
individuals are our covered employees.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the
federal income tax deduction for compensation paid to each of
the covered employees of a publicly held corporation
to $1 million per fiscal year, with exceptions for
performance-based compensation made under qualifying plans.
Under Section 162(m), Agere must periodically seek
stockholder approval of the plan; the plan was last approved by
stockholders in 2002. Agere is not proposing any changes to the
plan. A summary of the principal features of the plan is
provided below. Agere stockholders can find a complete copy of
the plan attached to the proxy statement available over the
Internet through the Securities and Exchange Commissions
EDGAR service.
Awards. Agere pays annual bonuses to officers
under the Short Term Incentive Plan. The plan provides for the
payment of cash bonuses for executive officers after performance
periods selected by the Compensation Committee, in accordance
with targets established at or near the beginning of the
performance periods. Each fiscal year is typically a performance
period, although other periods of time could be selected.
Typically, the committee makes any award payments subject to
Agere having a minimum level of net income for the performance
period. If that level of net income is met, the committee will
consider additional factors in setting each individuals
bonus (with respect to covered employees the
additional factors may only work to reduce the bonus amount).
Factors that may be considered in determining the amount of
individual bonuses may include the executive officers
individual performance, which may be measured by the quality of
strategic plans, organizational and management development,
special project leadership and similar indicators of individual
performance or other measures, and the companys financial
performance, which may be measured by revenue, operating income,
cash flow, earnings per share, return on equity, total return to
stockholders in the form of stock price appreciation and
dividends, if paid, or other measures. Net income for these
purposes is defined as our net income before taxes for a
specified period of time, excluding the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
extraordinary items;
|
|
|
|
cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
securities gains and losses;
|
|
|
|
amortization or write-off of goodwill, acquired intangibles, and
purchased in-process research and development; and
|
|
|
|
nonrecurring items including, but not limited to, gains or
losses on asset dispositions and sales of divisions, business
units or subsidiaries, restructuring and separation charges and
gains and losses from qualified benefit plan curtailments and
settlements.
|
Agere believes that it is not appropriate for these items to
have an impact on the level of executive compensation paid.
Agere uses the net income test so that awards to covered
employees can be deducted by Agere for federal income tax
purposes. Subject to this limitation and the maximum award under
the plan, the amount of each executive officers award is
determined in the sole discretion of the committee or, in the
case of an award to an officer who is not a covered
employee, in the sole discretion of the committee or a
person or committee to whom the committee has delegated that
authority. With respect to a covered employee, the
committee may reduce, but may not increase, the amount of a
bonus that otherwise would be payable.
When it determined officer bonuses for fiscal 2006, the
committee also took into account the extent to which the company
met revenue and non-GAAP operating margin targets.
The maximum amount that may be paid under the plan to any
participant in any fiscal year is $9 million. In fiscal
2006, there were nine participants in the plan.
44
Plan Administration. The Compensation
Committee administers the Short Term Incentive Plan.
Other Provisions. The Agere board of directors
may modify or terminate the Short Term Incentive Plan at any
time.
Tax Rules. The following is a brief summary of
the federal income tax consequences of payments made under the
Short Term Incentive Plan based on current federal income tax
laws. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and does not
describe state or local tax consequences. In general, ordinary
income will be recognized by participants in the plan at the
time that awards are paid or made available to them. At the time
that a participant recognizes ordinary income, Agere will be
entitled to a corresponding deduction if, among other things,
(i) the income meets the test of reasonableness, is an
ordinary and necessary business expense and is not an
excess parachute payment within the meaning of
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code and is not
disallowed by the $1 million limitation on compensation
paid to covered employees and (ii) any
applicable reporting obligations are satisfied.
Awards made in the future to any officer will be based on the
officers individual performance and the companys
future performance. Accordingly, the amount of cash bonuses to
be paid in the future to current or future participating
officers cannot be determined at this time. Actual amounts will
depend on the individuals and Ageres actual
performance. Agere stockholders can find the amounts Agere paid
to certain participants for bonuses under the plan in fiscal
2006 in the Agere Summary Compensation Table below.
The Agere board of directors recommends a
vote FOR the re-approval of the Agere Systems
Inc. Short Term Incentive Plan.
Information about Ageres equity compensation
plans. The following table summarizes information
about Ageres equity compensation plans as of
September 30, 2006. For additional information about
Ageres equity compensation plans, see note 4 to the
financial statements in Item 8 of Ageres 2006 annual
report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Under Equity
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights(1)
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
|
|
|
25,290,226
|
|
|
$
|
29.0283
|
|
|
|
20,768,864
|
(2)
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders(3)
|
|
|
1,476,915
|
|
|
$
|
270.7757
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
26,767,141
|
|
|
$
|
42.3671
|
|
|
|
20,768,864
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In connection with Ageres spin-off from Lucent, Agere
assumed stock options that had originally been granted by Lucent
or AT&T Corp. or companies that Lucent had acquired. The
table does not include information for equity compensation plans
assumed by Lucent in connection with acquisitions of the
companies that originally established those plans. At
September 30, 2006, 114,302 shares were issuable upon
exercise of outstanding options, with a weighted-average
exercise price of $57.0218 per share, under these plans.
Since the spin-off Agere has not granted, and Agere will not
grant in the future, any additional options under these plans. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes 15,606,788 shares available for issuance under
Ageres 2001 Long Term Incentive Plan, all of which were
available in connection with stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock awards, performance shares and units,
dividend equivalents and other stock unit awards. The amount
shown in the table also includes 4,855,663 shares available
under Ageres employee stock purchase plan and 306,413
shares available for issuance in connection with stock options,
restricted stock units and restricted stock granted under the
Agere Non-Employee Director Stock Plan. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
All of the shares reported in this row relate to stock options
granted prior to Ageres spin-off by Lucent under Lucent
plans that had not been approved by Lucents stockholders
and that Agere assumed in connection with the spin-off. Since
the spin-off, Agere has not granted, and will not grant in the
future, any further awards under these plans. |
45
PROPOSAL 4.
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS
AGERES
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Agere Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP to serve as Ageres independent registered public
accounting firm for fiscal 2007. Representatives of
PricewaterhouseCooopers LLP will be at the annual meeting to
answer questions. They will also have the opportunity to make a
statement if they desire to do so.
While not required by law or Ageres governing documents,
the Agere board of directors is asking our stockholders to
ratify the Audit Committees selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007. The Agere
board of directors is doing this as a matter of good corporate
practice. If Agere stockholders do not ratify the selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit Committee will consider
whether to select an alternate firm as Ageres independent
registered public accounting firm. Even if stockholders do
ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit
Committee may, in its discretion, select a different firm if it
believes doing so is in the interest of the company and its
stockholders.
Ageres
Relationship with its Independent Auditors
The fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to Agere during
fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
2,076,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,366,000
|
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial due diligence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
Intellectual property royalty
audits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Services related to our
reclassification and reverse stock split
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
Consultations regarding GAAP
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Audit-Related Fees
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
149,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer pricing
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
International tax compliance
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
249,000
|
|
International tax advice
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tax Fees
|
|
$
|
445,000
|
|
|
$
|
454,000
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
4,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees Billed
|
|
$
|
2,590,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,969,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For access to a web-based, accounting research product provided
by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. |
Under its charter, the Audit Committee must pre-approve all
engagements of the independent auditors unless an exception to
such pre-approval exists under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Each year, the committee approves the retention of the
independent auditors to audit Ageres financial statements,
including proposed fees, before the filing of the preceding
years annual report on
Form 10-K.
At the beginning of the fiscal year, the Audit Committee will
evaluate other known potential engagements of the independent
auditors, including the scope of the work proposed to be
performed and the proposed fees, and approve or reject each
service, taking into account whether the services are
permissible under applicable law and the possible impact of each
non-audit service on the independent auditors independence
from management. At each subsequent committee meeting, the
committee will receive updates on the services actually provided
by the independent auditors, and management may present
additional services for approval. Typically,
46
these would be services such as due diligence for an
acquisition, that would not have been known at the beginning of
the year. The committee has delegated to the Chairman of the
committee the authority to evaluate and approve engagements on
behalf of the committee in the event that a need arises for
pre-approval between committee meetings. This might occur, for
example, if Agere proposed to execute a financing on an
accelerated timetable. If the Chairman approves any engagements
pursuant to this delegation, he will report that approval to the
full committee at the next committee meeting.
In fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, each new engagement of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was approved in advance by the Audit
Committee or its Chairman, and none of those engagements made
use of the de minimis exception to pre-approval contained in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules.
The Agere board of directors recommends a vote
FOR the Audit Committees selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ageres independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007.
47
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The following table shows information concerning the
compensation of (i) Ageres Chief Executive Officer,
(ii) Ageres former Chief Executive Officer,
(iii) each of Ageres other executive officers who
were serving as such at the end of fiscal 2006 and (iv) two
additional individuals who were executive officers for part of
fiscal 2006, but were not serving as such at fiscal year end.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
Name and
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Principal Position (1)
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
|
Bonus ($)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
Awards ($)(3)
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
($)(4)
|
|
|
Richard L. Clemmer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
636,825
|
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
140,369
|
|
|
|
3,022,500
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
10,800
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John T. Dickson
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
66,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,174,820
|
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
14,040
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
320,000
|
|
|
|
33,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
23,331
|
|
Peter Kelly
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
34,854
|
|
|
|
1,343,000
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
9,060
|
|
Executive Vice
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
51,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
25,922
|
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
29,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
8,910
|
|
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denis P. Regimbal
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
291,667
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
18,054
|
|
|
|
1,007,250
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
9,127
|
|
Executive Vice President, Mobility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samir F. Samhouri
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
35,650
|
|
|
|
1,007,250
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
10,765
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Networking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruediger Stroh
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
279,451
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
34,074
|
|
|
|
1,343,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
101,560
|
|
Executive Vice President, Storage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Micallef
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
51,897
|
|
|
|
1,007,250
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
238,898
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Global
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean F. Rankin
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
320,000
|
|
|
|
96,000
|
|
|
|
35,862
|
|
|
|
1,007,250
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
9,360
|
|
Executive Vice President,
General
Counsel & Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Clemmer was appointed President and Chief Executive
Officer when Mr. Dickson retired from those positions in
October 2005. Messrs. Micallef, Regimbal and Samhouri and
Ms. Rankin became executive officers in October 2005.
Following the management changes that occurred after
Mr. Clemmer became President and Chief Executive Officer,
the positions of Mr. Micallef and Ms. Rankin ceased
being considered executive officer positions in December 2005.
Mr. Stroh joined Agere in November 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
For fiscal 2006, the amounts shown in this column are comprised
of the following: |
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Gross-ups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counseling and
|
|
|
Commuting
|
|
|
Assignment
|
|
Name
|
|
Car Allowance
|
|
|
Tax
Gross-up
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Mr. Clemmer
|
|
|
16,800
|
|
|
|
18,054
|
|
|
|
105,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Dickson
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Kelly
|
|
|
16,800
|
|
|
|
18,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Regimbal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Samhouri
|
|
|
16,800
|
|
|
|
18,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Stroh
|
|
|
15,400
|
|
|
|
18,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Micallef
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,035
|
|
Ms. Rankin
|
|
|
16,800
|
|
|
|
19,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Mr. Clemmers employment agreement, we paid him
$100,000 to be used for housing
and/or
commuting expenses. We also provided him $5,515 of additional
commuting benefits during an initial, transition period after he
became President and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date value
of restricted stock units received by the named individuals in
fiscal 2006. This value was computed using the closing price of
a share of Agere common stock on the date of grant for each
restricted stock unit. We do not pay dividend equivalents on
restricted stock units. The following table gives information
about the restricted stock units granted in fiscal 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance-Based
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Time-Based Restricted
|
|
|
Value at Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
|
Units Granted
|
|
|
Stock Units Granted in
|
|
|
of All Restricted Stock
|
|
Name
|
|
in Fiscal 2006 (#)
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 (#)
|
|
|
Units Held ($)
|
|
|
Mr. Clemmer
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
3,732,500
|
|
Mr. Kelly
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
1,493,000
|
|
Mr. Regimbal
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
1,119,750
|
|
Mr. Samhouri
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
1,119,750
|
|
Mr. Stroh
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,493,000
|
|
Mr. Micallef
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
1,119,750
|
|
Ms. Rankin
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
1,119,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The performance-based restricted stock units shown in the table
will be paid out on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant
if total stockholder return for Agere exceeds the market
capitalization weighted total stockholder return of a peer group
and the holder remains employed through that date. If the merger
is completed, the performance test will be deemed satisfied. One
quarter of the time-based restricted stock units shown in the
table for Mr. Clemmer will be paid out on each of the first
four anniversaries of the grant date if he remains employed
through the date of payment. The other time-based restricted
stock units shown in the table will be paid out on the second
anniversary of the date of grant if the holder remains employed
through that date. If the holders employment terminates
after the merger, the holder may be entitled to immediate
payment of all restricted stock units under our Officer
Severance Policy. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
For fiscal 2006, includes the following amounts: |
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k)
|
|
|
Term Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matching
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Sign-on
|
|
|
Assignment
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Name
|
|
Contributions ($)
|
|
|
Premiums ($)
|
|
|
Bonus ($)
|
|
|
Payments ($)
|
|
|
Payments ($)
|
|
|
Mr. Clemmer
|
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Dickson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,174,115
|
|
Mr. Kelly
|
|
|
6,300
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Regimbal
|
|
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Samhouri
|
|
|
9,925
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Stroh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Micallef
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Rankin
|
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2006, Mr. Micallef was on a temporary,
international assignment in Singapore. Under our international
assignment policy, which is available to all employees on a
temporary international assignment and is designed so that
employees are not disadvantaged by their international
assignment, Mr. Micallef received the amounts shown in the
table above, which consist principally of additional living and
travel expenses, as well as the tax gross-ups shown in the table
in footnote 2. |
OPTION
GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable Value
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Assumed Annual Rates
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Granted to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Stock Price Appreciation
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Employees in
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Option Term ($)(1)
|
|
Name
|
|
Granted (#)(2)
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
($/Share)
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
Richard L. Clemmer
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
9.845
|
|
|
|
10/29/2012
|
|
|
|
2,003,952
|
|
|
|
4,670,080
|
|
John T. Dickson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Kelly
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
13.315
|
|
|
|
11/30/2012
|
|
|
|
948,595
|
|
|
|
2,210,629
|
|
Denis P. Regimbal
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
13.315
|
|
|
|
11/30/2012
|
|
|
|
623,362
|
|
|
|
1,452,699
|
|
Samir F. Samhouri
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
13.315
|
|
|
|
11/30/2012
|
|
|
|
623,362
|
|
|
|
1,452,699
|
|
Ruediger Stroh
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
13.315
|
|
|
|
11/30/2012
|
|
|
|
1,084,108
|
|
|
|
2,526,434
|
|
Andrew Micallef
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
13.315
|
|
|
|
11/30/2012
|
|
|
|
542,054
|
|
|
|
1,263,217
|
|
Jean F. Rankin
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
13.315
|
|
|
|
11/30/2012
|
|
|
|
542,054
|
|
|
|
1,263,217
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts represent hypothetical gains that might be
achieved for the respective stock options if exercised at the
end of the option term. The assumed 5% and 10% rates of stock
price appreciation are prescribed by the Securities and Exchange
Commission. None of the assumed rates of stock price
appreciation represents our estimate or projection of the future
price of our common stock. The real value of the stock options
in this table depends upon the actual changes in the market
price of our common stock during the term of the stock options. |
|
(2) |
|
One quarter of Mr. Clemmers stock option becomes
exercisable on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant
date. One quarter of each of the other stock options shown in
the table becomes exercisable on the first anniversary of the
grant date. The remainder of each of these stock options becomes
exercisable in equal monthly increments over a three-year period
thereafter. Under our Officer Severance Policy, earlier
exercisability of these options may occur following a change in
control if the named individual subsequently leaves the company. |
50
AGGREGATED
OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND
FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Value of Unexercised
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised
|
|
|
In-the-Money
Options at
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Options at Fiscal Year-End (#)
|
|
|
Fiscal Year-End ($)
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercise (#)
|
|
|
Realized ($)
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Richard L. Clemmer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
29,290
|
|
|
|
2,542,500
|
|
John T. Dickson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Kelly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267,852
|
|
|
|
265,628
|
|
|
|
407,369
|
|
|
|
361,756
|
|
Denis P. Regimbal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,802
|
|
|
|
162,034
|
|
|
|
174,605
|
|
|
|
245,170
|
|
Samir F. Samhouri
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,522
|
|
|
|
143,846
|
|
|
|
32,562
|
|
|
|
222,013
|
|
Ruediger Stroh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,000
|
|
Andrew Micallef
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,842
|
|
|
|
135,315
|
|
|
|
234,531
|
|
|
|
196,269
|
|
Jean F. Rankin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,673
|
|
|
|
155,211
|
|
|
|
220,560
|
|
|
|
207,940
|
|
Pension
Plans
We have two programs that provide benefits under our pension
plans: a service based program and an account balance program.
Which program an employee participates in depends on their date
of hire. Employees hired after June 30, 2003 do not
participate in our pension plans. We have a non-qualified,
supplemental pension plan that provides benefits using the same
formulas as the tax-qualified pension plan based on compensation
that exceeds the amount that may be taken into account under a
tax-qualified pension plan.
Service
Based Program
The service based program generally covers most management
employees hired prior to January 1, 1999. Pensions provided
under this program are computed on an adjusted career average
pay basis. A participants annual pension benefit is equal
to 1.4% of the sum of the individuals:
|
|
|
|
|
Average annual pay for the five years ending December 31,
1998, excluding the annual bonus award paid in December 1997,
times the number of years of service prior to January 1,
1999;
|
|
|
|
Pay subsequent to December 31, 1998; and
|
|
|
|
Annual bonus award paid in December 1997.
|
Average annual pay includes base salary and annual bonus awards.
The normal retirement age under the service based program is 65.
However, employees who are at least age 50 with at least
15 years of service can retire with reduced benefits. If an
employees age is at least 50 and, when added to the
employees years of service, is equal to or greater than
75, the employee may retire with unreduced pension benefits. A
3% reduction is made for each year that age plus years of
service is less than 75. The unreduced pension benefit under
this early retirement provision is determined based on an
employees service and compensation history as of
January 1, 2005, and age and years of service when the
employee retires.
Account Balance
Program
The account balance program generally covers management
employees hired on or after January 1, 1999 and before
July 1, 2003. Under this program, we establish an account
for each participating employee and make annual
51
contributions to that account based on the employees age,
salary and bonus, in accordance with the following schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions as a percent
|
|
Age
|
|
of salary and bonus
|
|
|
less than 30
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
30 less than 35
|
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
35 less than 40
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
40 less than 45
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
45 less than 50
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
50 less than 55
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
55+
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
In addition, interest is credited on the last day of the year.
Once vested, normally after five years of service, an employee
participating in the account balance program is entitled to the
amounts in his or her account when he or she leaves the company.
Management employees hired on or after July 1, 2003,
including Messrs. Clemmer and Stroh, do not participate in
our pension plans.
Messrs. Regimbal and Samhouri and Ms. Rankin each
participates in the service based program. Mr. Dickson
participated in the service based program. Messrs. Kelly
and Micallef participate in the account balance program.
Federal laws place limitations on compensation amounts that may
be included under the qualified pension plan. In 2006, up to
$220,000 in eligible base salary and bonus could be included in
the calculation under the plan.
Compensation and benefit amounts that exceed the applicable
federal limitations are taken into account, and pension amounts
related to annual bonus awards payable to executive officers are
paid, under the supplemental pension plan. That plan is a
non-contributory plan and has the same two programs and uses the
same benefit formulas and eligibility rules as the qualified
pension plan. Pension amounts under the qualified pension plan
and supplemental pension plan are not subject to reductions for
social security benefits or other offset amounts.
The supplemental pension plan also provides executive officers
with minimum pensions. Eligible retired executive officers and
surviving spouses may receive an annual minimum pension equal to
15% of the sum of final base salary plus annual bonus awards.
This minimum pension will be offset by amounts received by plan
participants as pensions under the qualified and supplemental
pension plans.
If Messrs. Kelly and Micallef continue to be employed by
the company until age 65, we estimate that their balance in
the account balance program will be $1,324,358 for
Mr. Kelly and $1,442,189 for Mr. Micallef. This
represents a lump sum payment; other optional forms of payment
are available. This estimate assumes a 3% per year increase
in base salary and a bonus paid at target level each year.
If Messrs. Regimbal and Samhouri and Ms. Rankin
continue to be employed by the company until age 65, we
estimate that the annual pension payable to them under the
qualified and supplemental pension plans would be $231,505,
$374,053 and $235,951, respectively. These are single-life
annuity amounts. Other optional forms of payment, which provide
for actuarially reduced pensions, are available. These estimates
assume a 3% per year increase in base salary and a bonus
paid at target level each year. If the actual amounts they are
paid differ, or if they leave the company at a different time,
their actual pensions will differ.
OTHER
ARRANGEMENTS WITH AGERE EXECUTIVES
Officer
Severance Plan
Agere Systems has a severance policy that provides benefits for
an officer who is terminated by us other than for cause or who
chooses to leave following a change in control and within three
months of one of the following events occurring after the change
in control: either a diminution in job responsibility or a
material negative change in employment terms, including a
reduction in base salary or a material reduction in target bonus.
52
The benefits under this policy include continuation of salary
and health and welfare benefits and payment of annual bonus at
target levels for two years. These salary and bonus payments
would be taken into account for purposes of computing pensions.
During this two-year period, participation and vesting under our
stock-based benefit plans would continue. Alternatively, Agere
may make payment of the salary and target bonus in a lump sum,
in which event participation in company plans would end upon
payment of those amounts. Payment of any amount under these
arrangements will be conditional upon signing a release and will
be offset by any individually negotiated arrangement. The policy
provides that if an officer is subject to the tax imposed under
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, the officer will
receive additional payments from the company such that, after
payment of all taxes, the officer retains the amount that the
officer would have retained had that tax not applied.
Employment
Agreements
Mr. Clemmer
We entered into a letter agreement dated October 30, 2005,
with Mr. Clemmer that outlines the terms of his employment
with Agere Systems. Under the letter agreement, Mr. Clemmer
serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer. His salary
was initially set at $680,000 per year and his target bonus
is 125% of his base salary. For fiscal 2006, we agreed to pay
him a bonus of at least $425,000. Any bonus in future years will
depend on the level of achievement of goals set by the
Compensation Committee of our Board.
Mr. Clemmer received the following awards as hiring
incentives:
|
|
|
|
|
A seven-year stock option covering 500,000 shares. One
quarter of the option becomes exercisable on each of the first
four anniversary dates of the date of grant.
|
|
|
|
100,000 restricted stock units, one quarter of which are paid
out on each of the first four anniversary dates of the date of
grant.
|
|
|
|
150,000 restricted stock units which will be paid out after four
years only if our total stockholder return exceeds the market
capitalization-weighted total stockholder return for a peer
group of nine companies.
|
|
|
|
A lump sum payment of $100,000, to be used for housing
and/or
commuting expenses.
|
Mr. Clemmer also receives $1 million of company-paid
term life insurance, a $1,400 per month car allowance and a
$10,000 per year financial counseling allowance. The
financial counseling payments are grossed up for
taxes, so that Mr. Clemmer receives $10,000 after taxes.
Mr. Clemmer has the benefit of our officer severance
policy, which may affect the equity awards described above if
Mr. Clemmer leaves the combined company after the merger
under certain circumstances. In order to receive the benefit of
the severance plan, Mr. Clemmer agreed that if he leaves
the company, he will serve as non-executive chairman of our
Board for up to two years, if the Board requests.
Mr. Stroh
We entered into a letter agreement dated October 26, 2005,
with Ruediger Stroh that outlines the terms of his employment
with Agere Systems. Under the letter agreement, Mr. Stroh
serves as our Executive Vice President, Storage. His salary was
initially set at $325,000 per year and his target bonus is
75% of his base salary.
Mr. Stroh received the following awards as hiring
incentives:
|
|
|
|
|
A $100,000 sign-on bonus that is repayable in full if
Mr. Stroh voluntarily resigns or is terminated for cause
before November 22, 2007.
|
|
|
|
A seven-year stock option covering 200,000 shares that
becomes exercisable over a four-year period.
|
|
|
|
100,000 restricted stock units which will be paid out after four
years only if our total stockholder return exceeds the market
capitalization-weighted total stockholder return for a peer
group of nine companies.
|
53
Mr. Stroh also receives $500,000 of company-paid term life
insurance, a $1,400 per month car allowance and a
$10,000 per year financial counseling allowance. The
financial counseling payments are grossed up for
taxes, so that Mr. Stroh will receive $10,000 after taxes.
Mr. Stroh has the benefit of our officer severance policy,
which may affect the equity awards described above if
Mr. Stroh leaves the combined company after the merger
under certain circumstances.
Mr. Dicksons
Separation Agreement
On November 4, 2005, we entered into a separation agreement
with John T. Dickson, our former President and Chief Executive
Officer, relating to his retirement from the company. Under the
agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Dickson did not receive a bonus for fiscal 2005.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Dickson received a severance payment of
$3.6 million, which is equal to two years salary and
bonus at target. This payment was conditioned on
Mr. Dickson signing a waiver and release.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Dickson received a transition assistance payment of
$133,333, which is equal to two months salary, in return
for his assistance with business and customer transition issues.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Dicksons stock options were governed by the terms
of the awards, which provide that any portion of any stock
option that was exercisable on October 26, 2005, remained
exercisable for 90 days, and any portion of any stock
option that was not then exercisable terminated.
|
|
|
|
We paid Mr. Dickson $1,504,899, which was the value of
Mr. Dicksons accrued benefit under our supplemental
pension plan.
|
|
|
|
We paid Mr. Dickson $682,612, which is equal to the amount
of additional benefit that Mr. Dickson would have accrued
under the supplemental pension plan had he continued to be
employed by the company for an additional two years and become
eligible for an early retirement benefit under the plan.
|
|
|
|
We paid Mr. Dickson $253,271, which was equal to his
accrued benefit under our tax-qualified pension plan.
|
54
REPORT OF
THE AGERE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Agere Compensation Committee oversees the companys
compensation plans and practices. We review and establish the
individual compensation levels for members of senior management
and we work with management to establish the outlines of
Ageres compensation programs for other employees.
Executive
Compensation Philosophy
We designed our compensation program to attract, motivate and
retain highly talented individuals to drive business success.
The program reflects the following principles:
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation should be related to performance
|
Our compensation program reinforces the companys business
and financial objectives. Employee compensation will vary based
on company and individual performance. When the company performs
well against the objectives we set, employees will receive
greater incentive compensation. When the business does not meet
these objectives, incentive awards will be reduced or
eliminated. An employees individual compensation will also
vary based on the persons performance, contribution and
overall value to the business. And, employees with sustained
high performance should be rewarded more than those in similar
positions with lesser performance.
|
|
|
|
|
Agere employees should think like Agere stockholders
|
We believe that Agere employees should act in the interests of
Agere stockholders and the best way to encourage them to do that
is through an equity interest in the company. We do this in a
number of ways. We have, over time, granted equity-based awards,
such as stock options
and/or
restricted stock units, to most employees. In addition, we have
an employee stock purchase plan that enables employees to
purchase Agere stock at a discount through payroll deductions
and a 401(k) plan under which U.S. employees can invest in
Agere common stock. Our goal is to have market competitive stock
programs that encourage each employee to think like an owner of
the business.
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive compensation should be a greater part of total
compensation for more senior positions
|
The proportion of an individuals total compensation that
varies with individual and company performance objectives should
increase as the individuals business responsibilities
increase.
We have designed our compensation program to balance short and
long-term financial objectives, to encourage building
stockholder value and to reward individual and company
performance.
When we determine compensation levels for executive officers, we
generally consider the advice of independent, outside
consultants retained by the committee, and recommendations made
by the companys senior human resources executive. We also
review compensation survey data from our consultants and other
independent sources to ensure that our total compensation
program is competitive and that the amounts and types of
compensation the company pays its leaders are appropriate. We
look at compensation data from companies in our industry as well
as from companies in a broad cross-section of the technology
sector and similarly sized companies. We target overall
compensation opportunities to be competitive with our industry
comparison group. In addition, we consider the compensation
level of each of our officers and attempt to maintain
appropriate relationships between the compensation of the
different officers.
Deductibility
of Compensation Paid under Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code
It is our policy to have the compensation paid to the
companys five most highly compensated executive officers
qualify as performance-based and deductible for federal income
tax purposes under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code unless there is a valid compensation reason that would
justify paying non-deductible amounts. That law provides that
compensation paid to those individuals in excess of
$1 million per year is not deductible for federal income
tax purposes unless it is performance-based and a number of
other requirements are met.
55
Our stock options and bonuses, other than guaranteed bonuses,
are intended to be performance-based and thus should
be deductible for federal income tax purposes, regardless of
amount. The other compensation we have paid generally is not
deductible to the extent that the total amount of that
compensation for one of those officers is more than
$1 million in any year.
2006
Background
At the beginning of fiscal 2006, John Dickson retired as Chief
Executive Officer of the company and we hired Rick Clemmer to
fill that position. Soon after his appointment, we and Rick made
a number of changes in senior management. Some people left the
company. Others moved into new positions of responsibility.
Almost all senior management positions were held by different
people than a year earlier.
We believed that these changes created a great deal of
uncertainty for those who remained. Would the new CEO like their
strategy and management style? Would they agree with any policy
changes that resulted from the management change? At the same
time, we wanted to challenge the new leadership team to improve
the companys financial performance and wanted to provide
meaningful financial incentives to reinforce that challenge. In
our discussion below, you will see that we addressed these
matters in a number of aspects of our executives
compensation.
Compensation
Program
Our executive compensation program has a number of components,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Incentives
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentives
|
|
|
|
Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
Severance policy
|
|
|
|
Perquisites
|
Each of these components is discussed below.
Base
Salary
We target base salaries for senior management at levels that are
comparable to base salaries for similar positions at similarly
sized technology companies. We review surveys periodically to
ensure that our salaries are competitive. We also take into
account other elements of our compensation package so that
senior managements total compensation opportunity will be
competitive.
In the first few years after our initial public offering in
2001, we experienced significant declines in our revenue as a
result of extreme drops in market demand for telecommunications
products of the types we supplied. In response to these
declines, we exited our optoelectronics business and sold or
discontinued a number of other product lines.
We believe a significantly lower revenue level and less complex
business make it appropriate to consider whether lower salary
levels are appropriate; however, we also recognized that the
declining revenues were resulting in lower bonuses and no value
being recognized from stock options and chose not to adjust
executives base salaries as the size and complexity of the
company became smaller. However, in 2006, we hired a new CEO and
moved new people into senior management positions and did take
into account the size and complexity of the company in
determining executive officer salaries.
Bonus
Each year, our executives have an opportunity to earn a bonus.
We set financial performance goals each year based on our view
of what would be an acceptable level of performance for the
company, taking into account
56
managements outlook for the year, semiconductor industry
conditions and competitors performance. The extent to
which these goals are met determines in large part the level of
executive bonuses. We feel that financial performance measures
alone do not fully reflect executives contributions to the
company and also take into account personal performance
characteristics such as quality of strategy, leadership and
execution in setting final bonus amounts. In the past, our
actual performance has generally not reached a level we viewed
as meriting target level bonuses and actual payouts have
generally been much lower than target level as a result.
In fiscal 2006, bonuses for all employees, including senior
management, were tied to achievement of annual revenue and
non-GAAP operating margin targets. In addition, the company had
to meet a non-GAAP net income test in order for any bonuses to
be payable to the officers named in the Summary Compensation
Table, other than Mr. Clemmer. Non-GAAP operating margin
and non-GAAP net income excluded items that we felt were not
appropriate either to hold against employees, such as
restructuring charges, or to give employees the benefit of, such
as a large gain from the settlement of tax contingencies.
We set the non-GAAP net income target used to determine whether
named executive officers could earn any bonus in October 2005,
before the senior management changes occurred. Because this
target determines only whether bonuses can be paid and not the
actual amount, we set the target at a level below which we felt
that we would not want to pay bonuses to senior executives,
based on the then-current forecast for fiscal 2006. This target
was met. Making the non-GAAP net income test does not, however,
guarantee that any bonus will be paid. Making the non-GAAP net
income target does make any bonuses paid performance-based
compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code and allows us to deduct the amount of the
bonuses for federal income tax purposes.
Normally, we would set the other targets used to determine
executive officer bonuses at the beginning of the fiscal year in
October. This year, because of the significant management
changes, we felt that we needed to wait until new management
could review the business forecasts before setting the
targets. We discussed bonus metrics at a meeting in December
2005, and then set the revenue and non-GAAP operating margin
targets in April 2006 based on managements outlook for the
year at that time as approved by the board of directors. At that
time, we set the levels of performance required to achieve
bonuses paid at the target level above managements
then-current outlook for the year.
The companys performance in fiscal 2006 did not meet the
threshold level of performance for revenue and fell between the
threshold and target levels of performance for non-GAAP
operating margin and resulted in company-wide bonus funding at
less than half the target level. Bonuses for our executive
officers were adjusted based on individual and business unit
performance and relative base salaries of different officers and
ranged from 40 to 64% of target.
Equity
Awards
Last year, we awarded three types of long-term incentives to
executive officers: stock options, time-based restricted stock
units and performance-based restricted stock units. We have
historically granted stock options each year as part of our
regular compensation program. Last year we also granted
time-based and performance-based restricted stock units to
address specific issues related to the management changes. We
target long-term incentive grants, other than last years
time-based restricted stock unit awards, to provide an
above-median long-term compensation opportunity and attempt to
structure the awards so that the company must achieve
competitive or better performance in order for our officers to
actually achieve above-median long-term compensation.
We discussed and approved the equity awards that were part of
the regular compensation program at a series of meetings, the
latest of which occurred on December 1, 2005.
December 1, 2005 was the grant date for these awards. This
was also the grant date for equity awards for other employees
under our annual grant program and the annual stock option grant
received by non-employee Directors. In accordance with our
normal new-hire practice, Mr. Strohs sign-on equity
awards were granted on the first day of the month following the
commencement of his employment. Mr. Clemmers equity
awards were granted after we announced that he had been
appointed President and Chief Executive Officer.
57
Stock options. In fiscal 2006, we granted
stock options to our executive officers in order to align their
pay with stockholders interests and competitive market
practice. For each executive officer, the Compensation Committee
awarded stock options based on an evaluation of competitive
market value, the size of awards made to other executive
officers and the officers relative impact to the business.
The grants made to Messrs. Clemmer and Stroh were part of
the package offered when they joined the company, and were
larger than a typical annual grant for their positions.
Time-based restricted stock units. We felt
that the management changes at the beginning of fiscal 2006
created significant uncertainty for many of our officers. To
encourage these officers not to leave the company, we granted
them restricted stock units that would vest, or become payable
in shares of stock, if they stayed with the company for two
years.
Performance-based restricted stock units. We
also wanted to create an incentive for our management team to
improve the companys total stockholder return. To do this,
we awarded officers restricted stock units that will be paid out
four years from the date of grant if the recipient stays with
the company and a company performance test is met. That test
requires that Ageres total stockholder return over a
four-year period exceed that of a peer group. The companies
included in the peer group are: Advanced Micro Devices, Analog
Devices, Atmel, Broadcom, Intersil, LSI Logic, Marvell
Technology Group, National Semiconductor and PMC-Sierra. These
performance-based restricted stock units were granted to
Mr. Clemmer when he joined the company and to the other
executive officers on December 1, 2005, the regular, annual
grant date for our equity programs. As of November 30,
2006, our performance was meeting the performance test.
The time-based restricted stock unit awards and the
performance-based restricted stock unit awards will not
constitute performance-based compensation for
purposes of section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and
thus will not be deductible for federal income tax purposes for
us to the extent that the value of those awards upon vesting,
together with other non-deductible amounts, exceeds
$1 million. We believed that adding a performance test to
the time-based restricted stock unit awards was not consistent
with why we granted the awards to retain valued
members of the management team. We felt that adding a non-GAAP
net income test, which is the test that would be required by our
stock plan, to the performance-based restricted stock units,
would have detracted from the focus that our executives would
have on the total stockholder return test and could have led to
an unintended result.
Retirement
Benefits
We have pension plans that are described in detail elsewhere in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Individuals hired since
July 2003, including Messrs. Clemmer and Stroh, do not
participate in these plans. Benefits under these plans depend on
a participants eligible compensation, which includes
salary and bonus. Eligible compensation does not include other
items such as stock option gains or the value of restricted
stock unit awards. We have not credited any executive officer
with more years of service under any of these plans than they
have actually served with the company or its predecessors. Our
pension plans were originally put in place by our predecessors.
Many of our competitors do not have pension plans and we have
been reducing participation and benefits under the plans in
recent years in an effort to become more competitive with other
companies in our industry.
Severance
Policy
We have an officer severance policy that provides benefits to
officers who are terminated other than for cause or who leave
the company after a change in control if they leave for
good reason. You can find a detailed description of
the policy elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
We provide these benefits because we want executives to focus on
the companys business and enhancing stockholder value
without undue concern about any possible loss of their job.
Perquisites
The only perquisites that we provide to our executive officers
are a car allowance and a financial counseling allowance. The
car allowance is $16,800 a year. We provide it because our
officers often travel to meetings with customers, suppliers and
investors and we do not feel it a productive use of their time
to track and submit
58
reimbursement requests for business use of their own cars. We
also believe that providing the car allowance would reduce the
need for the company to provide a car and driver to transport
executive officers to meetings. The car allowance is subject to
tax and is not grossed up. The financial counseling allowance is
$10,000 per year. We provide a tax
gross-up on
the financial counseling allowance so that our executives can
actually obtain that amount of financial counseling.
Compensation
of the Chief Executive Officer
John Dickson was our Chief Executive Officer until he retired in
late October 2005. At that time, we appointed Rick Clemmer to
succeed him. A discussion of the compensation of both
individuals follows.
Mr. Dickson
Mr. Dickson retired near the beginning of the fiscal year,
before we had made any compensation decisions for him. When he
retired, we entered into an agreement with him that provided for
benefits consistent with our Officer Severance Policy. Under the
circumstances, we believed that Mr. Dickson was entitled to
the benefit of that policy. You can find a description of this
agreement on page 54. We also agreed to pay
Mr. Dickson two additional months salary in return
for his assistance with business and customer transition issues.
Mr. Clemmer
Prior to his appointment as President and Chief Operating
Officer, Mr. Clemmer was a partner in a venture capital
firm and had his own technology consulting company in addition
to being an outside director of Agere. When he joined us, he
withdrew from these outside activities. At that time, we entered
into an employment agreement with him. You can find a
description of that agreement on page 53. In that agreement
we provided that Mr. Clemmer would receive an initial base
salary of $680,000 a year. This is lower than what
Mr. Dickson was receiving and reflects our view that a
lower salary was appropriate given the smaller size of the
company than in the past.
We made Mr. Clemmer a participant in our annual bonus
program, with a target bonus of 125% of his base salary. Because
the metrics in our annual bonus program, particularly annual
revenue, are difficult for a new CEO to impact in the
short-term, we also agreed that he would receive a bonus for
fiscal 2006 of at least $425,000. This amount is one half of his
target. This is the amount he actually received as our actual
performance would have resulted in a bonus equal to 40% of
target, or $340,000. We agreed to pay him at least $425,000 in
order to encourage him to join us and to stay at least until
that amount was paid.
In order to provide Mr. Clemmer with a more meaningful
equity stake in the company than he had as an outside director
so that his interests would quickly be aligned in a more
meaningful way with those of our stockholders, our employment
agreement with Mr. Clemmer also provided for a stock option
grant, a time-based restricted stock unit award and a
performance-based restricted stock unit award. We determined the
size and structure of these awards after discussing our
objectives and possible structures with an outside compensation
consultant. We believe that these awards provided
Mr. Clemmer with a strong incentive to improve the
companys financial performance.
Because we are based in Allentown, PA and Mr. Clemmer lived
on the West Coast of the United States, we gave him a lump sum
of $100,000, to be used for housing
and/or
commuting expenses. We also provided Mr. Clemmer $5,515 of
additional commuting benefits during an initial transition
period after he became President and Chief Executive Officer.
In addition, based on the positions and opportunities he was
giving up to join the company, we agreed that if he chose to
leave Agere before October 26, 2006, we would pay him one
years salary and bonus at target. We refer to this
arrangement below as the one-year termination
arrangement. Since he is still with the company, he will
not receive this amount. If he had chosen to leave, he would
have forfeited his right to receive the guaranteed bonus for
fiscal 2006 and all of the equity awards granted pursuant to his
employment agreement.
Mr. Clemmer, like other new hires, does not participate in
our pension plans.
59
Mr. Clemmer does participate in our Officer Severance
Policy. If, on September 30, 2006, he had been terminated
without cause and ignoring the one-year termination arrangement,
he would have been entitled to the following benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
Two years base salary and bonus at target $3,060,000
in total. This amount can be paid in a lump sum, or over a
two-year period.
|
|
|
|
If payments are made over a two-year period, he would have
received the following for that two-year period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued vesting of stock options and time-based restricted
stock units.
|
|
|
|
The opportunity to earn approximately one half of his
performance-based restricted stock units if the four-year
performance test is met. If he elected a lump sum payment, this
award would have been canceled.
|
|
|
|
Continued participation in company health and welfare plans.
|
|
|
|
Continued payment of car allowance and financial counseling
allowance and tax
gross-up on
financial counseling allowance $69,708 in total.
|
In addition to the events described above, if on
September 30, 2006, Mr. Clemmer had been terminated
other than for cause or had left the company for good
reason following a recent change in control, and ignoring
the one-year termination arrangement, all of his outstanding
equity awards would have become fully vested at the time he
ceased being an employee of the company.
We believe that Mr. Clemmers total compensation for
fiscal 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description of Compensation
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Salary1
|
|
$
|
636,825
|
|
Bonus1
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
Other annual
compensation1
|
|
|
140,369
|
|
Equity
awards2
|
|
|
4,358,555
|
|
All other
compensation1
|
|
|
10,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,571,549
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Amount taken from Summary Compensation Table. |
|
2 |
|
This amount is the sum of the grant-date present values of
Mr. Clemmers 2006 equity awards used for financial
reporting purposes. This is an estimate of amounts that
Mr. Clemmer may receive in the future. Depending on our
stock price performance, he may receive more or less than the
amount shown. |
We believe that the amount we have paid Mr. Clemmer for
fiscal 2006 is a fair and reasonable amount.
Harold A. Wagner (Chair)
Arun Netravali
Thomas P. Salice
Rae Sedel
60
REPORT OF
THE AGERE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Ageres Audit Committee has reviewed Ageres audited
financial statements as of, and for the fiscal year ended,
September 30, 2006, and met with both management and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Ageres independent public
registered accounting firm, to discuss those financial
statements. Management has represented to Ageres Audit
Committee that the financial statements were prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Management has primary responsibility for Ageres financial
statements and the overall reporting process, including the
companys system of internal controls. The independent
auditors audit the annual financial statements prepared by
management, express an opinion as to whether those financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the
company in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and discuss with us
their independence and any other matters they are required to
discuss with us or that they believe should be raised with us.
Ageres Audit Committee oversees these processes, although
the Agere Audit Committee must rely on the information provided
to it and on the representations made by management and the
independent auditors.
Ageres Audit Committee has received from and discussed
with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the written disclosure and the
letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees).
These items relate to that firms independence from the
company. Ageres Audit Committee also discussed with
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP any matters required to be discussed
by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication
with Audit Committees).
Based on these reviews and discussions, the Agere Audit
Committee recommended to the Agere board of directors that
Ageres audited financial statements be included in its
annual report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.
Thomas P. Salice (Chairman)
Richard S. Hill
Harold A. Wagner
61
AGERE
PERFORMANCE GRAPHS
The following graphs compare the cumulative total stockholder
return on Agere common stock to that of the S&P 500 Index
and the S&P 500 Semiconductors Index. The graphs assume that
a $100 investment was initially made in Ageres
Class A common stock, Class B common stock and each of
the indices at the earliest date shown, and that dividends, if
any, were reinvested in all cases. The stock price performance
shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future price
performance. The graphs below take into account the
reclassification of each share of Class A common stock and
each share of Class B common stock into one share of common
stock on May 27, 2005. Agere stockholders now own only
common stock.
The following graph compares the return on an investment in our
Class A common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P
500 Semiconductors Index from September 30, 2001 through
September 30, 2006.
Value of
a $100 Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-Sep-01
|
|
|
30-Sep-02
|
|
|
30-Sep-03
|
|
|
30-Sep-04
|
|
|
30-Sep-05
|
|
|
30-Sep-06
|
Agere Systems Inc.
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
26.57
|
|
|
|
$
|
74.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
25.36
|
|
|
|
$
|
25.14
|
|
|
|
$
|
36.06
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
79.51
|
|
|
|
$
|
98.91
|
|
|
|
$
|
112.63
|
|
|
|
$
|
126.44
|
|
|
|
$
|
140.08
|
|
S&P 500 Semiconductors Index
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
63.62
|
|
|
|
$
|
118.35
|
|
|
|
$
|
98.21
|
|
|
|
$
|
127.27
|
|
|
|
$
|
117.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2002
|
|
|
Fiscal 2003
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
Agere Systems Inc.
|
|
|
|
(73.43
|
)%
|
|
|
|
179.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
(65.80
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(0.86
|
)%
|
|
|
|
43.42
|
%
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
|
(20.49
|
)%
|
|
|
|
24.40
|
%
|
|
|
|
13.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
12.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
10.79
|
%
|
S&P 500 Semiconductors Index
|
|
|
|
(36.38
|
)%
|
|
|
|
86.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
(17.02
|
)%
|
|
|
|
29.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
(7.85
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
The following graph compares the return on an investment in our
Class B common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P
500 Semiconductors Index from June 3, 2002, the date on
which Ageres Class B common stock began trading on
the New York Stock Exchange, through September 30, 2006.
Value of
a $100 Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-Jun-02
|
|
|
30-Sep-02
|
|
|
30-Sep-03
|
|
|
30-Sep-04
|
|
|
30-Sep-05
|
|
|
30-Sep-06
|
Agere Systems Inc.
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
31.63
|
|
|
|
$
|
92.33
|
|
|
|
$
|
32.59
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.26
|
|
|
|
$
|
47.70
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
78.79
|
|
|
|
$
|
98.01
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.60
|
|
|
|
$
|
125.28
|
|
|
|
$
|
138.80
|
|
S&P 500 Semiconductors Index
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
49.98
|
|
|
|
$
|
92.96
|
|
|
|
$
|
77.14
|
|
|
|
$
|
99.97
|
|
|
|
$
|
92.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
Return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-Jun-02 through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-Sep-02
|
|
|
Fiscal 2003
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
Agere Systems Inc.
|
|
|
|
(68.37
|
)%
|
|
|
|
191.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
(64.71
|
)%
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
43.42
|
%
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
|
(21.21
|
)%
|
|
|
|
24.40
|
%
|
|
|
|
13.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
12.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
10.79
|
%
|
S&P 500 Semiconductors Index
|
|
|
|
(50.02
|
)%
|
|
|
|
86.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
(17.02
|
)%
|
|
|
|
29.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
(7.85
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
THE
MERGER
The following is a description of the material aspects of the
merger, including the merger agreement. While we believe that
the following description covers the material terms of the
merger, the description may not contain all of the information
that is important to you. We encourage you to read carefully
this entire joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the
merger agreement attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex A, for a more complete
understanding of the merger.
Background
of the Merger
LSI and Agere are both participants in the semiconductor
industry, and are very familiar with each others
businesses. Each of them routinely evaluates business
alternatives and strategic opportunities as part of their
ongoing evaluation of developments in the marketplace, and
participates in discussions with third parties regarding
possible transactions. Senior management of LSI and Agere from
time to time in recent years have informally discussed the
future of the semiconductor and storage systems sectors and
various ways in which the two companies could work together,
including a possible combination of LSI and Agere.
In June 2006, Mr. Abhijit Talwalkar, President and Chief
Executive Officer of LSI, and Mr. Richard Clemmer,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Agere, met and
discussed the hard disk drive and networking businesses.
Mr. Talwalkar and Mr. Clemmer met again on
July 13, 2006 and August 3, 2006 and discussed their
respective businesses. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Talwalkar
contacted Mr. Clemmer suggesting a meeting to explore a
possible combination of their two companies. On August 21,
2006, Agere and LSI entered into a confidentiality agreement to
facilitate the exchange of due diligence materials between the
two companies. On August 23, 2006, Mr. Talwalkar,
together with Mr. Jeffrey Richardson, Executive Vice
President for LSIs Custom Solutions Group, Mr. James
Anderson, Senior Director of Marketing and Strategic Planning
for LSIs Custom Solutions Group, and Mr. Eric
Williams, Senior Director, Corporate Development, met at the
offices of Goldman Sachs in Los Angeles to discuss the
businesses of Agere and LSI, their respective strategies and the
challenges and opportunities that each company faced. On August
28 and 29, 2006, Mr. Richardson met with
Mr. Samir Samhouri, executive vice president with and
general manager of Ageres Networking Division, and
Mr. Anderson at Ageres offices in Allentown,
Pennsylvania to discuss the respective businesses of LSI and
Agere, as well as a possible combination of the two companies.
Peter Kelly, Chief Financial Officer of Agere, and
Mr. Bryon Look, Chief Financial Officer of LSI, held
similar discussions on the same dates, and also discussed
potential cost synergies that could result from a combination of
the two businesses.
On August 22, 2006, members of the Agere board of directors
received an update on the status of contacts between LSI and
Agere from Agere management and representatives of Goldman
Sachs. In addition, the Agere board of directors authorized
management and representatives of Goldman Sachs to pursue
contacts with certain private equity investors regarding their
potential interest in a transaction involving Agere. During
September and October 2006, Mr. Clemmer, Mr. Kelly,
Ms. Jean Rankin, executive vice president, general counsel
and secretary of Agere and representatives of Goldman Sachs met
with several private equity investors, identified with the
assistance of Goldman Sachs and Agere management, in order to
gauge potential interest in an acquisition of Agere. None of
these meetings resulted in any offers that were acceptable to
Ageres board of directors.
On September 5, 2006, Mr. Talwalkar telephoned
Mr. Clemmer to further discuss the potential for a business
combination transaction. Although no particular transaction was
discussed, both agreed that the possibility of a transaction
between LSI and Agere merited further analysis and consideration.
On September 11, 2006, Mr. Talwalkar provided the LSI
board of directors with a telephonic update of the discussions
with Mr. Clemmer. On September 18, 2006, the LSI board
of directors again met telephonically to discuss the transaction
with members of LSI management, representatives of Morgan
Stanley, financial advisor to LSI, and LSIs legal advisor,
Wilson Sonsini. The LSI board of directors was provided with a
detailed overview of the Agere business units, the framework for
a formal term sheet, and a request for approval for continuing
the investigation by LSI management of a possible business
combination.
On September 24, 2006, the LSI board of directors met
telephonically with members of LSI management, representatives
of Morgan Stanley and Wilson Sonsini for the purpose of
reviewing a proposed non-binding set of transaction terms, which
included (i) merger transaction with a fixed exchange ratio
pursuant to which Agere
64
stockholders would receive 2.05 shares of LSI common stock
for each Agere share, (ii) proposals with respect to the
corporate governance of the combined company, and in particular
provided that Mr. Talwalkar would be the Chief Executive
Officer of the combined company, that the combined company would
have a nine member board, of which four members would be
nominated by Agere, and that the chairman of the board of
directors of the combined company would be an independent
director of LSI and (iii) a proposed termination fee of
$125 million if the transaction were terminated under
certain circumstances. The LSI board of directors authorized
management to deliver the non-binding set of transaction terms
to management of Agere.
On September 25, 2006, Mr. Talwalkar and
Mr. Clemmer met in Los Angeles to discuss the
companies respective business models and the strategic
rationale for a possible business combination. During this
meeting, Mr. Talwalkar and Mr. Clemmer discussed a
tax-free exchange of stock to effect the transaction in a manner
that would enable the stockholders of both companies to realize
the benefits of a combination. Mr. Talwalkar proposed a
non-binding set of transaction terms for a merger of LSI and
Agere, which included (i) a fixed exchange ratio pursuant
to which Agere stockholders would receive 2.05 shares of
LSI common stock for each Agere share, (ii) proposals with
respect to the corporate governance of the combined company, and
in particular provided that Mr. Talwalkar would be the
Chief Executive Officer of the combined company, that the
combined company would have a nine member board, of which four
members would be nominated by Agere, and that the chairman of
the board of directors of the combined company would be an
independent director of LSI, and (iii) a proposed
termination fee of $125 million if the transaction were
terminated under certain circumstances.
On September 28, 2006, members of the Agere board of
directors received a telephonic update on the status of contacts
between LSI and Agere from Agere management and representatives
of Goldman Sachs.
On October 10, 2006, members of Agere senior management,
together with representatives of Goldman Sachs, met with members
of LSI senior management and representatives of Morgan Stanley,
financial advisor to LSI, in Milpitas, California. During this
meeting, Agere and LSI senior management reviewed their
respective businesses, and further discussed the potential
synergies of a business combination between the two companies.
On October 11, 2006, representatives of Agere and Goldman
Sachs had a conference call with representatives of LSI and
Morgan Stanley in which the participants continued to discuss
the respective businesses and operations of Agere and LSI.
On October 13, 2006, Mr. Clemmer and
Mr. Talwalkar met to discuss the progress made by their
respective teams in analyzing the strategic merits of a business
combination, and each agreed to continue the review and analysis
of the others business and operations.
During October 2006, representatives of LSI and Agere continued
to exchange information about their respective businesses, and
had several telephonic meetings in which business and
operational issues were discussed. Members of senior management
of Agere, together with representatives of Goldman Sachs, had
periodic discussions with LSI and representatives of Morgan
Stanley throughout October and early November 2006 regarding the
exchange ratio and the key social and governance issues
presented by the merger. In this regard, Agere consulted with
Goldman Sachs and Skadden, Arps, and LSI consulted with Morgan
Stanley and Wilson Sonsini.
On October 13 and October 19, 2006, the LSI board of
directors met telephonically. At these meetings,
Mr. Talwalkar and other members of LSI management discussed
with the board the potential strategic benefits of the
transaction, risks related to the transaction and alternative
strategies including other acquisition targets and continuing on
a standalone basis. In addition, LSI management updated the
board on the status of managements due diligence
investigation.
On October 19, 2006, members of the Agere board of
directors received a telephonic update on the status of contacts
between LSI and Agere from Agere management and representatives
of Goldman Sachs.
At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Agere board of directors
on October 24, 2006, Mr. Clemmer briefed the board
members on discussions with senior management of LSI.
Representatives of Goldman Sachs and Skadden, Arps were present
for the portion of the meeting during which the LSI proposal was
discussed. At this meeting, Ageres board of directors
discussed the possibility of a transaction with LSI and the
terms of LSIs proposal. The Agere board of directors
authorized management to continue due diligence and discussions
with LSI
65
on the exchange ratio, governance and other issues presented by
LSIs proposal, in order to ascertain whether this
transaction was beneficial to Agere and its stockholders and, if
so, whether an acceptable proposal might be available.
On November 2, 2006, Agere provided a revised proposal to
LSI seeking (i) a fixed exchange ratio resulting in 49.99%
of the diluted equity of the combined company being held by
Agere stockholders, (ii) governance proposals for the
combined company, including a combined company board of
directors comprised of five directors from LSI and five
directors from Agere, and a chairman selected from among the
Agere independent directors, (iii) maintenance of current
levels of employee compensation and benefits for a two-year
period following closing, and (iv) a termination fee equal
to 3% of the imputed Agere equity value.
On November 3, 2006, the LSI board of directors met
telephonically with members of LSI management, and
representatives of Morgan Stanley and Wilson Sonsini for the
purpose of reviewing the revised proposal provided by Agere. The
board considered the Agere proposal, including the impact of
different valuation scenarios and corporate governance matters
related to the proposal.
Discussions between Agere and LSI continued on a regular basis
during November 2006 with respect to the exchange ratio and
other key terms of the proposed transaction. On November 7,
2006, representatives of Morgan Stanley delivered to
representatives of Goldman Sachs a revised set of non-binding
proposed transaction terms which included (i) a fixed
exchange ratio pursuant to which Agere stockholders would
receive 2.15 LSI shares for each share of Agere common stock,
(ii) governance terms consistent with LSIs earlier
proposal, (iii) maintenance of current levels of employee
compensation and benefits for a two-year period and (iv) a
termination fee equal to 3% of the imputed Agere equity value.
On November 17, 2006, LSI, through Wilson Sonsini,
delivered a draft merger agreement to Agere through its legal
advisor Skadden, Arps. From November 17, 2006 through
December 3, 2006, representatives of Agere and Skadden,
Arps reviewed and negotiated the draft merger agreement with LSI
and Wilson Sonsini.
On November 9, 2006, at a regularly-scheduled meeting of
the LSI board of directors, representatives of Morgan Stanley
reviewed the financial terms of the proposed transaction and
representatives from Wilson Sonsini updated the board on
outstanding issues between the parties.
On November 15 and 16, 2006, members of Agere senior management,
together with representatives of Goldman Sachs, met with members
of LSI senior management and representatives of Morgan Stanley
in San Jose, California. During these meetings, Agere and LSI
senior management reviewed their respective businesses, and
further discussed the potential synergies of a business
combination between the two companies.
The LSI board of directors met telephonically on
November 17, 2006 with members of LSI management and
representatives of Morgan Stanley and Wilson Sonsini for
the purpose reviewing the ongoing due diligence and outstanding
issues between the parties.
The Agere board of directors met on November 20, 2006, with
representatives of Goldman Sachs and Skadden, Arps in
attendance. At the invitation of the Agere board of directors,
Mr. Talwalkar made a presentation to the Agere board of
directors on the business and operations of LSI, as well as the
strategic rationale for the proposed transaction. Following
Mr. Talwalkars presentation, members of Agere
management and representatives of Goldman Sachs and Skadden,
Arps briefed the Agere board of directors on the status of
discussions with LSI, the ongoing due diligence and outstanding
issues between the parties, including the proposed exchange
ratio, the proposed governance terms, and the terms of the
non-solicitation and recommendation covenants. Representatives
of Goldman Sachs reviewed with Ageres board of directors
its financial analyses with respect to LSIs proposal.
Following discussion and review with its legal and financial
advisors, the Agere board authorized further discussions with
LSI for the purpose of determining whether an agreement on price
and other material terms could be reached.
Concurrently with the review and discussions regarding the draft
merger agreement, representatives of LSI, Agere, Skadden, Arps
and Wilson Sonsini conducted due diligence investigations with
respect to business, legal, regulatory, tax and other matters of
LSI and Agere. LSI and Agere also had extensive discussions
during this time with respect to contractual issues, including
(i) the non-solicitation covenant, including either
partys ability to have discussions with potential
third-party acquirers, (ii) the circumstances under which
either party could change its
66
recommendation of the transaction, (iii) the nature and
extent of representations and warranties to be given by each
company, (iv) the conditions to closing and (v) the
circumstances under which termination fees would be payable.
On November 22, 2006, the LSI board of directors met
telephonically with members of LSI management, representatives
of Morgan Stanley and Wilson Sonsini for the purpose reviewing
the proposed transaction including proposed exchange ratios and
corporate governance matters.
On November 30, 2006, members of Agere senior management,
together with representatives of Goldman Sachs and Skadden, Arps
provided members of the Agere board of directors with a
telephonic update as to the status of negotiations with LSI. The
representatives of Goldman Sachs informed the board members as
to the status of discussions regarding the exchange ratio, and
indicated that in order to obtain additional enhancement of the
exchange ratio it would likely be necessary to agree to reduce
the representation of Agere directors on the board of the
combined company to three directors and agree that an LSI
independent director would be chairman of the board of directors
of the combined company. The Agere board members discussed,
among other things, the proposed exchange ratio and the
corporate governance of the combined company, and gave guidance
to Ageres senior management with respect to the
negotiation of those terms with LSI.
On November 30, 2006, the LSI board of directors met
telephonically with members of LSI management and
representatives of Morgan Stanley and Wilson Sonsini for the
purpose reviewing the proposed transaction. The board discussed
proposed exchange ratios for the transaction and governance
related matters and received an update on the due diligence
review conducted by management and LSIs advisors.
Following further discussions between LSI and Agere and their
representatives, LSI agreed to increase the exchange ratio to
2.16 LSI shares for each Agere share and Agere agreed to accept
the governance provisions requested by LSI. On December 3,
2006, Agere, LSI and their respective legal advisors finalized a
proposed merger agreement to be executed by the parties. Later
that day, a telephonic meeting of the Agere board of directors
was convened to consider whether to approve the merger
agreement. At the meeting, Mr. Clemmer and Ms. Rankin
informed the Agere board of directors that the merger agreement
had been finalized and included an exchange ratio of 2.16 LSI
shares for each Agere share. Management then reviewed certain
aspects of the proposed transaction. Representatives of Skadden,
Arps reviewed certain legal matters, and the terms of the
proposed merger agreement, including the governance terms,
representations and warranties, covenants, conditions to
completion of the merger and termination provisions. Goldman
Sachs reviewed with Ageres board of directors its
financial analyses with respect to the proposed transaction and
then rendered its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed by
delivery of its written opinion, dated December 3, 2006, to
Ageres board of directors that, as of the date of its
opinion and based upon and subject to the factors and
assumptions set forth in the opinion, the exchange ratio of
2.16 shares of LSI common stock to be received for each
share of Agere common stock pursuant to the merger agreement was
fair from a financial point of view to the holders of shares of
Agere common stock. The Agere board of directors, by unanimous
vote of the directors present, determined that the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the Agere
stockholders and approved and adopted the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby, and determined to
recommend that the Agere stockholders adopt the merger agreement.
Also on December 3, 2006, a telephonic meeting of the LSI
board of directors was convened to consider whether to approve
the merger agreement. At the meeting, LSI management informed
the LSI board of directors that the merger agreement had been
finalized and included an exchange ratio of 2.16 LSI shares for
each Agere share. Management then reviewed certain aspects of
the proposed transaction. Representatives of Wilson Sonsini
reviewed certain legal matters, and the terms of the proposed
merger agreement, including the governance terms,
representations and warranties, covenants, conditions to
completion of the merger and termination provisions. Morgan
Stanley, delivered its oral opinion, later confirmed in writing,
that, as of December 3, 2006 and based upon and subject to
the factors and assumptions set forth in the opinion, the
exchange ratio pursuant to the proposed merger agreement was
fair from a financial point of view to LSI. A description of
this opinion appears under The Merger
Consideration of the Merger by the LSI Board of Directors.
Following such discussion, the LSI board of directors, by
unanimous vote, determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable
and in the best interests of the LSI stockholders and approved
the merger agreement
67
and the transactions contemplated thereby, and determined to
recommend that the LSI stockholders approve the issuance of LSI
common stock in connection with the merger.
Promptly after the meetings of the boards of directors of LSI
and Agere, the management of LSI and Agere executed the merger
agreement and a joint press release announcing the transaction
was issued early in the morning of December 4, 2006.
Reasons
for the Merger
Overview
The boards of directors and management teams of both LSI and
Agere believe that the proposed merger represents the best
strategic alternative for delivering increased value to our
respective stockholders.
LSI and Agere believe the merger presents a unique opportunity
to create a combined entity that will offer a comprehensive set
of building block solutions, including semiconductors, systems
and related software for storage, networking and consumer
electronics products, and that the merger should allow the
combined company to deliver significant benefits to its
customers, stockholders and employees. The LSI and Agere boards
of directors and their respective management teams each analyzed
various alternative strategies to address their respective risks
and challenges as stand-alone entities. See the section entitled
Background of the Merger beginning on page 64.
After reviewing and debating their respective strategic
alternatives and the opportunity for the combined company
presented by the merger, as more fully described below, the LSI
and Agere boards of directors each determined to pursue the
merger in lieu of the other alternatives because each believes
the merger will create a combined company that will be able to
achieve the strategic and financial benefits described below.
The LSI and Agere boards of directors each identified the
following anticipated strategic and financial benefits of the
merger:
|
|
|
|
|
Complementary Businesses. The products and
development capabilities of the two companies are complementary,
and should enable the combined company to compete more
effectively in attractive markets. The combined company should
be stronger than either company on its own, with greater breadth
and depth in storage and networking/communications product
offerings and a greater ability to develop new product offerings
in these market segments. In addition, the combined company is
expected to benefit from access to large growth markets, such as
those provided by the mobile products business of Agere and the
consumer products business of LSI.
|
|
|
|
Customers. The combined company will have deep
relationships with many of the market-leading customers in our
chosen market segments. LSI and Agere expect to improve their
existing ability to expand current customer relationships, and
expect to increase the penetration of new customer accounts. LSI
and Agere believe that the combination of the two
companies product lines and engineering resources should
enable the combined company to meet customer needs more
effectively and to deliver more complete solutions to our
customers. In addition, LSI and Agere believe the larger sales
organization, greater marketing resources and financial strength
of the combined company may lead to improved opportunities for
marketing the combined companys products.
|
|
|
|
Engineering Talent. The combined company will
have over 4,200 engineers, including over 1,700 that hold
masters or doctorate degrees, which should enable the combined
company to compete more effectively by developing innovative
products and delivering greater value to customers more rapidly
than either company could do on a standalone basis.
|
|
|
|
Intellectual Property Portfolio. The combined
company will have over 10,000 pending and issued
U.S. patents, which will be one of the largest intellectual
property portfolios in the semiconductor industry. This
portfolio is expected to provide the combined company with
additional licensing opportunities.
|
|
|
|
Reduction in Operating Costs. The combined
company is expected to realize substantial cost savings
beginning in 2007, with annual cost savings reaching at least
$125 million in 2008 from increased efficiencies in
manufacturing and operating expenses. LSI and Agere expect the
combined company to achieve benefits from exercising greater
purchasing power with its suppliers; consolidation and reduction
of
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
areas of overlap in operating expenses; and elimination of
redundant expenses, including the expenses of maintaining two
separate public companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stronger Financial Position. The combined
company will have greater scale and financial resources,
including total cash and short term investments of approximately
$1.4 billion on a pro forma basis as adjusted to reflect
the repayment of LSIs convertible notes in November 2006.
LSI and Agere expect that this stronger financial position will
improve the combined companys ability to support product
development strategies; to respond more quickly and effectively
to customer needs, technological change, increased competition
and shifting market demand; and to pursue strategic growth
opportunities in the future, including acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
Stock-for-Stock
Transaction with Fixed Exchange Ratio. The
stockholders of each company will share in the benefits expected
from the synergies and cost savings the combined company will
generate. The fact that the merger consideration is based on a
fixed exchange ratio provides certainty as to the number of
shares of LSI common stock that will be issued to Agere
shareholders.
|
There can be no assurance that the anticipated strategic and
financial benefits of the merger will be achieved, including
that the anticipated cost savings resulting from the merger will
be achieved
and/or
reflected in the trading price of LSI common stock following the
completion of the merger.
Consideration
of the Merger by the LSI Board of Directors
Recommendation
of the LSI Board of Directors
At a meeting held on December 3, 2006, the LSI board of
directors unanimously:
|
|
|
|
|
determined that the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable and in the
best interests of the LSI stockholders;
|
|
|
|
approved the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
directed that the issuance of shares of LSI common stock in
connection with the merger be submitted for consideration by LSI
stockholders at an LSI special meeting; and
|
|
|
|
resolved to recommend that the LSI stockholders vote
for the proposal to approve the issuance of shares
of LSI common stock in connection with the merger.
|
Among other things considered by the LSI board of directors in
making this recommendation, the LSI board of directors requested
and considered the written opinion of Morgan Stanley, described
below in the section entitled Opinion of LSI Financial
Advisor beginning on page 71, that as of
December 3, 2006, and subject to the assumptions,
considerations and limitations set forth in its opinion, the
exchange ratio provided for in the merger agreement is fair,
from a financial point of view, to LSI. The Morgan Stanley
opinion addresses only the fairness of the exchange ratio
pursuant to the merger agreement from a financial point of view
to LSI. The LSI board of directors has determined that the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are
advisable and in the best interests of the LSI stockholders,
based upon its consideration of the Morgan Stanley opinion and
numerous other factors described below.
In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement, the
LSI board of directors consulted with LSIs management,
LSIs legal counsel regarding the legal terms of the
merger, LSIs business consultants regarding the strategic
aspects of the merger, and LSIs financial advisors
regarding the financial aspects of the merger and the fairness,
from a financial point of view, of the exchange ratio to LSI.
The factors that the LSI board of directors considered in
reaching its determination include, but were not limited to, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the strategic benefits of the merger, as described in the
section entitled Reasons for the Merger beginning on
page 68 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
|
|
historical information concerning LSIs and Ageres
respective businesses, prospects, financial performance and
condition, operations, technology, management and competitive
position, including public reports concerning results of
operations during the most recent fiscal year and fiscal quarter
for each company filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission;
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
managements view of the financial condition, results of
operations and businesses of LSI and Agere before and after
giving effect to the merger;
|
|
|
|
current financial market conditions and historical market
prices, volatility and trading information with respect to the
common stock of LSI and the common stock of Agere;
|
|
|
|
the relationship between the market value of the common stock of
Agere and the consideration to be paid to stockholders of Agere
in connection with the merger;
|
|
|
|
the belief that the terms of the merger agreement, including the
parties representations, warranties and covenants, and the
conditions to their respective obligations, are reasonable;
|
|
|
|
managements view of the prospects of LSI as an independent
company;
|
|
|
|
other strategic alternatives for LSI, including the potential to
enter into strategic relationships with third parties or acquire
or combine with third parties;
|
|
|
|
|
|
detailed financial analyses and pro forma and other information
with respect to LSI and Agere presented by Morgan Stanley,
including Morgan Stanleys opinion to the effect that, as
of the date of the written opinion, and based upon and subject
to the considerations and limitations set forth in its opinion,
the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger agreement was fair,
from a financial point of view, to LSI. A copy of Morgan
Stanleys written opinion is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex B;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of the merger on LSIs customers, suppliers and
employees; and
|
|
|
|
reports from management, legal and financial advisors as to the
results of the due diligence investigation of Agere.
|
In addition, the LSI board of directors also identified and
considered a variety of potentially negative factors in its
deliberations concerning the merger, including, but not limited
to:
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the potential benefits sought in the merger,
including anticipated synergies, might not be fully realized;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the merger might not be completed, or that
completion might be unduly delayed;
|
|
|
|
the effect of public announcement of the merger on LSIs
sales and operating results, and LSIs ability to attract
and retain key management, marketing and technical personnel;
|
|
|
|
the substantial charges to be incurred in connection with the
merger, including costs of integrating LSI and Agere and
transaction expenses arising from the merger;
|
|
|
|
the risk that despite the efforts of the combined company, key
technical and management personnel might not remain employed by
the combined company; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
various other risks associated with the merger and the
businesses of LSI and the combined company described in the
section entitled Risk Factors beginning on
page 14 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
|
The LSI board of directors concluded, however, that these
negative factors could be managed or mitigated by LSI or by the
combined company or were unlikely to have a material impact on
the merger or the combined company, and that, overall, the
potentially negative factors associated with the merger were
outweighed by the potential benefits of the merger.
The above discussion of the material factors considered by the
LSI board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but
does set forth the principal factors considered by the LSI board
of directors. The LSI board of directors collectively reached
the unanimous conclusion to approve the merger agreement and the
merger in light of the various factors described above and other
factors that each member of the LSI board of directors felt were
appropriate. In view of the wide variety of factors considered
by the LSI board of directors in connection with its evaluation
of the merger and the complexity of these matters, the LSI board
of directors did not consider it practical, and did not attempt,
to quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the
specific factors it considered in
70
reaching its decision. Rather, the LSI board of directors made
its recommendation based on the totality of information
presented to and the investigation conducted by it. In
considering the factors discussed above, individual directors
may have given different weights to different factors.
The LSI board of directors believes that the merger is
advisable and in the best interests of the LSI stockholders.
Opinion
of LSI Financial Advisor
LSI retained Morgan Stanley to provide it with financial
advisory services and a financial opinion in connection with a
possible merger, acquisition or other strategic combination. The
LSI board of directors selected Morgan Stanley to act as its
financial advisor based on Morgan Stanleys qualifications,
expertise and reputation and its knowledge of the business and
affairs of LSI. At the meeting of the LSI board of directors on
December 3, 2006, Morgan Stanley rendered its oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing, that as of December 3,
2006, and based upon and subject to the various considerations
set forth in the opinion, the exchange ratio pursuant to the
merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to
LSI.
The full text of the written opinion of Morgan Stanley, dated as
of December 3, 2006, is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex B. The opinion sets forth,
among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed,
matters considered and limitations on the scope of the review
undertaken by Morgan Stanley in rendering its opinion. LSI
stockholders are urged to read the opinion provided by Morgan
Stanley to the LSI board of directors carefully and in its
entirety. In addition, LSI stockholders should carefully
consider the following description of the analysis performed by
Morgan Stanley in connection with rendering its opinion when LSI
stockholders determine whether to approve the issuance of shares
of LSI common stock in connection with the merger. Morgan
Stanleys opinion is directed to the LSI board of directors
and addresses only the fairness from a financial point of view
of the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger agreement to LSI as
of the date of the opinion. It does not address any other
aspects of the merger and does not constitute a recommendation
to any holder of LSI common stock as to how to vote at the LSI
special meeting with respect to the proposal to approve the
issuance of shares of LSI common stock in connection with the
merger. The summary of the opinion of Morgan Stanley set forth
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Morgan Stanley, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and
other business and financial information of LSI and Agere,
respectively;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning LSI and Agere,
respectively, prepared by the managements of LSI and Agere,
respectively;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain financial projections concerning LSI and Agere,
respectively, prepared by the managements of LSI and Agere,
respectively;
|
|
|
|
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of LSI and Agere, respectively, with
senior executives of LSI and Agere, respectively;
|
|
|
|
discussed certain strategic, financial and operational benefits
anticipated from the merger with the managements of LSI and
Agere, respectively;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the pro forma financial impact of the merger on
LSIs earnings per share, consolidated capitalization and
financial ratios;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for LSI common
stock and Agere common stock, respectively;
|
|
|
|
compared the financial performance of LSI and Agere,
respectively, and the prices and trading activity of LSI common
stock and Agere common stock, respectively, with that of certain
other publicly-traded companies comparable with LSI and Agere,
respectively, and their securities;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available,
of certain comparable acquisition transactions;
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
participated in discussions and negotiations among
representatives of LSI and Agere and their financial and legal
advisors;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the merger agreement and certain related documents; and
|
|
|
|
performed such other analyses and considered such other factors
as Morgan Stanley deemed appropriate.
|
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley assumed and relied
upon without independent verification the accuracy and
completeness of the information supplied or otherwise made
available to it by LSI and Agere for the purposes of its
opinion. With respect to the internal financial statements and
projections, including information relating to the strategic,
financial and operational benefits anticipated from the merger
and assessments regarding the prospects of LSI and Agere, Morgan
Stanley assumed that they were reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of the future financial performance of LSI and Agere,
respectively. In addition, Morgan Stanley assumed that the
merger would be consummated in accordance with the terms set
forth in the merger agreement without any waiver, amendment or
delay of any terms or conditions, including, among other things,
that the merger will be treated as a tax-free reorganization
pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Morgan Stanley also assumed that in connection with the receipt
of all the necessary regulatory approvals for the proposed
merger, no restrictions would be imposed or delays would result
that would have a material adverse affect on the contemplated
benefits expected to be derived in the proposed merger. Morgan
Stanley is not a legal, tax, regulatory or actuarial advisor.
Morgan Stanley is a financial advisor only and relied upon,
without independent verification, the assessment of LSI and its
legal, tax, regulatory and actuarial advisors with respect to
such matters.
Morgan Stanley relied upon, without independent verification,
the assessment by the managements of LSI and Agere of:
(i) the strategic, financial and other benefits expected to
result from the merger; (ii) the timing and risks
associated with the integration of LSI and Agere;
(iii) their ability to retain key employees of LSI and
Agere, respectively and (iv) the validity of, and risks
associated with, LSIs and Ageres existing and future
intellectual property, products, services and business models.
Morgan Stanley did not make any independent valuation or
appraisal of the assets or liabilities of LSI and Agere, nor was
Morgan Stanley furnished with any such appraisals. Morgan
Stanleys opinion was necessarily based on financial,
economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the
information made available to it as of December 3, 2006.
Events occurring after the date thereof may affect Morgan
Stanleys opinion and the assumptions used in preparing it,
and Morgan Stanley does not assume any obligation to update,
revise or reaffirm its opinion.
The following is a brief summary of the material analyses
performed by Morgan Stanley in connection with its oral opinion
and the preparation of its written opinion letter dated
December 3, 2006. The various analyses summarized below
were based on closing prices for the common stock of LSI and
Agere as of December 1, 2006, the last full trading day
preceding the day of the special meeting of the LSI board of
directors to consider and approve, adopt and authorize the
merger agreement. Although each analysis was provided to the LSI
board of directors, in connection with arriving at its opinion,
Morgan Stanley considered all of its analyses as a whole and did
not attribute any particular weight to any analysis described
below. Some of these summaries of financial analyses include
information presented in tabular format. In order to fully
understand the financial analyses used by Morgan Stanley,
the tables must be read together with the text of each summary.
The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the
financial analyses.
On December 3, 2006, LSI and Agere entered into a merger
agreement whereby each share of Agere common stock would be
converted into the right to receive 2.16 shares of LSI
common stock. Based on the closing prices of LSI common stock as
of December 1, 2006, this exchange ratio represented an
implied price of $22.81 per share of Agere common stock.
Based on the exchange ratio and shares, restricted stock units
and options outstanding as of September 30, 2006, Morgan
Stanley calculated that as a result of the merger, LSIs
stockholders would own approximately 52% of the combined company
on a fully diluted basis using the treasury stock method and
Ageres shareholders would own approximately 48% following
completion of the merger pursuant to the merger agreement.
72
Agere
Trading Range Analysis. Morgan Stanley
performed a trading range analysis to provide background and
perspective with respect to the historical share prices of Agere
common stock. Morgan Stanley reviewed the range of closing
prices of Agere common stock for various periods ended on
December 1, 2006. Morgan Stanley observed the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended December 1, 2006
|
|
Range of Closing Prices
|
|
Last 30 Trading Days
|
|
$
|
15.90 - $18.72
|
|
Last 60 Trading Days
|
|
$
|
14.51 - $18.72
|
|
Last 90 Trading Days
|
|
$
|
14.38 - $18.72
|
|
Last 12 Months
|
|
$
|
12.00 - $18.72
|
|
Morgan Stanley noted that as of December 1, 2006 the
closing price per share of Agere common stock as of that date
was $17.79.
Historical Exchange Ratio Range
Analysis. Morgan Stanley reviewed the ratios of
the range of closing prices of Agere common stock divided by the
corresponding closing prices of LSI common stock over various
periods ended on December 1, 2006. For each of the periods
reviewed, Morgan Stanley observed the relevant range of low and
high exchange ratios.
Morgan Stanley calculated a range of implied ownership of Agere
shareholders on a fully diluted basis, using the treasury stock
method, based on observed relevant range of low and high
exchange ratios. The following table summarizes Morgan
Stanleys analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
Implied
|
Period Ended December 1, 2006
|
|
Exchange Ratios
|
|
Agere Ownership
|
|
Last 30 Trading Days
|
|
|
1.63x - 1.97
|
x
|
|
40% - 45%
|
Last 60 Trading Days
|
|
|
1.63x - 2.02
|
x
|
|
40% - 46%
|
Last 90 Trading Days
|
|
|
1.63x - 2.02
|
x
|
|
40% - 46%
|
Last 12 Months
|
|
|
1.23x - 2.02
|
x
|
|
34% - 46%
|
Morgan Stanley noted that the exchange ratio pursuant to the
merger agreement was 2.16x and that based on the prices of
shares of Agere and LSI common stock on December 1, 2006,
the exchange ratio as of that date was 1.68x.
Comparable Company Analysis. Morgan Stanley
performed a comparable company analysis, which attempts to
provide an implied value of a company by comparing it to similar
companies. Morgan Stanley compared certain financial information
of Agere with publicly available consensus estimates for other
companies that shared similar business characteristics of Agere.
The companies used in this comparison included the following
storage, enterprise and networking, and wireless component
companies:
|
|
|
|
|
Atheros Communications, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Broadcom Corporation
|
|
|
|
Conexant Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Emulex Corporation
|
|
|
|
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
|
Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
|
|
|
|
PMC-Sierra, Inc.
|
|
|
|
QLogic Corporation
|
|
|
|
Qualcomm Incorporated
|
|
|
|
RF Micro Devices, Inc.
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
|
STMicroelectronics N.V.
|
|
|
|
Texas Instruments Incorporated
|
For purposes of this analysis, Morgan Stanley analyzed the
following statistics of each of these companies for comparison
purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
the ratios of aggregate value to estimated sales for calendar
year 2006 and 2007 (in each case, based on publicly available
consensus equity research estimates).
|
|
|
|
the ratios of price to estimated earnings per share for calendar
year 2006 and 2007 (in each case, based on publicly available
consensus equity research estimates).
|
Based on the analysis of the relevant metrics for each of the
comparable companies, Morgan Stanley selected representative
ranges of financial multiples of the comparable companies and
applied these ranges of multiples to the relevant Agere
financial statistic. For purposes of estimated calendar year
2006 and 2007 sales and earnings per share Morgan Stanley
utilized publicly available equity research estimates available
as of December 1, 2006. Based on Ageres outstanding
shares and options as of September 30, 2006, Morgan Stanley
estimated the implied value per Agere share as of
December 1, 2006 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
Representative
|
|
Implied Value
|
Calendar Year Financial Statistic
|
|
Multiple Range
|
|
per Share of Agere
|
|
Aggregate Value to Estimated 2006
Revenue
|
|
|
1.5x - 3.2x
|
|
|
$
|
13.91 - $28.42
|
|
Aggregate Value to Estimated 2007
Revenue
|
|
|
1.4x - 2.8x
|
|
|
$
|
13.85 - $26.60
|
|
Price to Estimated 2006 EPS
|
|
|
18.0x - 24.0x
|
|
|
$
|
14.75 - $19.67
|
|
Price to Estimated 2007 EPS
|
|
|
16.0x - 22.0x
|
|
|
$
|
17.84 - $24.52
|
|
Morgan Stanley noted that as of December 1, 2006 the
closing price per share of Agere common stock as of that date
was $17.79.
No company utilized in the comparable company analysis is
identical to Agere. In evaluating comparable companies, Morgan
Stanley made judgments and assumptions with regard to industry
performance, general business, economic, market and financial
conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the
control of Agere, such as the impact of competition on the
businesses of Agere and the industry generally, industry growth
and the absence of any adverse material change in the financial
condition and prospects of Agere or the industry or in the
financial markets in general. Mathematical analysis (such as
determining the average or median) is not in itself a meaningful
method of using comparable company data.
Discounted Equity Value Analysis. Morgan
Stanley performed a discounted equity value analysis, which is
designed to provide insight into the future value of a
companys common equity as a function of the companys
future earnings and its current forward price to earnings. The
resulting value is subsequently discounted to arrive at a
present value for such companys stock price. In connection
with this analysis, Morgan Stanley calculated a range of present
equity values per share of Ageres common stock on a
standalone basis. To calculate the discounted equity value,
Morgan Stanley utilized calendar year 2008 forecasts that were
extrapolated from equity research estimates using a range of
revenue growth assumptions from 10.0% 14.0% and
operating margin assumptions of 12.0% 16.0%. Morgan
Stanley applied a range of price to earnings multiples to these
estimates and applied a discount rate of 11%.
74
The following table summarizes Morgan Stanleys analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
Representative
|
|
Implied Value
|
Calendar Year 2008 Assumed Revenue Growth/Operating Margin
|
|
Multiple Range
|
|
per Share of Agere
|
|
10.0% Revenue Growth/12.0%
Operating Margin
|
|
|
15.0x - 18.0x
|
|
|
|
$14.72 - $17.66
|
|
12.0% Revenue Growth/14.1%
Operating Margin
|
|
|
17.0x - 20.0x
|
|
|
|
$19.95 - $23.47
|
|
14.0% Revenue Growth/16.0%
Operating Margin
|
|
|
20.0x - 23.0x
|
|
|
|
$27.11 - $31.18
|
|
Morgan Stanley noted that as of December 1, 2006 the
closing price per share of Agere common stock as of that date
was $17.79.
Securities Research Analysts Price
Targets. Morgan Stanley reviewed and analyzed
future public market trading price targets for Agere common
stock prepared and published by equity research analysts. These
targets reflect each analysts estimate of the future
public market trading price of Agere common stock. The range of
undiscounted analyst price targets for Agere was $13.00 to
$24.00.
Morgan Stanley noted that as of December 1, 2006 the
closing price per share of Agere common stock as of that date
was $17.79.
The public market trading price targets published by the
securities research analysts do not necessarily reflect current
market trading prices for Agere common stock and these estimates
are subject to uncertainties, including the future financial
performance of Agere and future financial market conditions.
Analysis of Precedent Transactions. Morgan
Stanley also performed a precedent transaction analysis, which
is designed to imply a value of a company based on publicly
available financial terms and premiums of selected transactions
that share some characteristics with the merger. In connection
with its analysis, Morgan Stanley compared publicly available
statistics for 7 selected merger transactions in the technology
sector between January 1, 2003 and December 1, 2006 in
which the target company was publicly traded, transaction values
were greater than $500 million and the target
shareholders implied pro forma fully diluted ownership was
greater than 30%. The following is a list of these transactions:
Selected
Technology Merger Transactions (Target/Acquiror)
|
|
|
|
|
ChipPAC, Inc./ST Assembly Test Services Ltd.
|
|
|
|
GlobespanVirata, Inc./Conexant Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Integrated Circuit Systems, Inc./Integrated Device Technology,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
Lucent Technologies Inc./Alcatel
|
|
|
|
McDATA Corporation/Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Nextel Communications, Inc./Sprint Corporation
|
|
|
|
VERITAS Software Corporation/Symantec Corporation
|
For each transaction noted above Morgan Stanley noted the
provisions for corporate governance such as who would be the
chief executive officer, chairman and members of the board of
directors of the combined company, as provided for in the
transactions definitive documentation. Morgan Stanley also
noted the implied exchange ratio premium to the 30 trading day
average exchange ratio for the constituent companies, where
available.
Morgan Stanley noted that certain of the transactions noted
above could be characterized as mergers of equals in
which the transactions definitive documentation provided
for the corporate governance profile of the combined company to
generally be filled in a balanced manner from both the acquiror
and the acquired company, or shared upside mergers
in which the transactions definitive documentation
provided for the corporate governance profile of the combined
company to generally be filled in a less balanced manner. For
each category of merger of equals and shared
upside transactions, Morgan Stanley selected a
representative range of implied exchange ratio premiums to the
30 trading day average exchange ratio for such groups and
compared such representative ranges to
75
the average exchange ratio of Agere and LSI common stock over
the 30 trading day period ended December 1, 2006. The
following table summarizes Morgan Stanleys analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference Range of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 Day Average Exchange
|
|
Implied
|
|
Implied Agere
|
Merger Transactions
|
|
Ratio Premiums
|
|
Exchange Ratios
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Merger of Equals
Transactions
|
|
|
0% - 20%
|
|
|
|
1.74x - 2.09x
|
|
|
|
42% - 47%
|
|
Shared Upside
Transactions
|
|
|
10% - 30%
|
|
|
|
1.92x - 2.26x
|
|
|
|
45% - 49%
|
|
Morgan Stanley noted that the exchange ratio pursuant to the
merger agreement was 2.16x and that based on the prices of
shares of Agere and LSI common stock on December 1, 2006,
the exchange ratio as of that date was 1.68x.
Morgan Stanley also compared publicly available statistics for
21 selected transactions in the semiconductor and hardware
sectors between January 1, 2001 and December 1, 2006
in which the target company was publicly traded and transaction
values were greater than $500 million. The following is a
list of these transactions:
Selected
Semiconductor/Hardware Transactions (Target/Acquiror)
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Digital Information Corporation/Quantum Corporation
|
|
|
|
Artisan Components, Inc./ARM Holdings PLC
|
|
|
|
ATI Technologies Inc./Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
|
|
|
|
C-Cube Microsystems Inc./LSI Logic Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChipPAC, Inc./ST Assembly Test Services Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas Semiconductor Corporation/Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
|
|
|