UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number | 811-21077 |
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II | |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) | |
1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, | New York 10105 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Lawrence G. Altadonna - 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10105 | |
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: | 212-739-3371 |
Date of fiscal year end: | May 31, 2009 | |
Date of reporting period: | November 30, 2008 |
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e -1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.
ITEM 1. REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II |
|
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II |
|
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semi-Annual Report |
|
|
November 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letter to Shareholders |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Insights/Performance & Statistics |
|
2-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedules of Investments |
|
5-23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Assets and Liabilities |
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Operations |
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Changes in Net Assets |
|
26-27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements |
|
29-35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Highlights |
|
36-38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matters Relating to the Trustees Consideration of the Investment Management and Portfolio Management Agreements |
|
39-40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent Events/Proxy Voting Policies & Procedures |
|
41-43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Shareholder Meetings Results |
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Letter to Shareholders |
January 15, 2009
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to provide you with the semi-annual report for PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II and PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II (collectively, the Funds) for the six-month period ended November 30, 2008.
Tight credit conditions and a global economic slowdown caused municipal bond prices to fall during the period. The Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index returned (4.98)% while the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, a broad credit market measure of government and corporate securities, posted a positive 0.24% return. Stocks fared worse in the downturn. The Standard & Poors 500 Index returned (35.20)% for the period, among the worst periods on record for equities. The Federal Reserve (the Fed) sought to inject liquidity into the economy through multiple initiatives, including reducing the Federal Funds rate twice during the reporting period. The Fed moves lowered the key target rate on loans between banks from 2.00% to 1.00%.
In the coming weeks or months, we would expect the de-leveraging of the private sector to meet its counterpart in the leveraging of the federal government as it seeks to inject more than a trillion dollars of liquidity into the nations financial system. This initiative holds potential to restore stability and some relative safety to debt securities outside of the shortest-term government issues.
Subsequent to the six month period ended November 30, 2008, a decision to redeem a portion of each Funds Auction Rate Preferred Shares (ARPS) was made at the recommendation of the Funds investment manager and approved by the Board of Trustees. These redemptions were intended to increase and maintain asset coverage for each Funds ARPS above the 200% level, permitting the Funds to pay previously declared common share dividends and to declare and pay future common share dividends. Depending on market conditions, coverage ratios may increase or decrease further. With respect to each of the Funds, as of the date of this letter, all dividend payments which were postponed have been paid and all dividend declarations which were postponed have subsequently been declared.
For specific information on the Funds and their performance, please review the following pages. If you have any questions regarding the information provided, we encourage you to contact your financial advisor or call the Funds shareholder servicing agent at (800) 331-1710. In addition, a wide range of information and resources is available on our Web site, www.allianzinvestors.com/closedendfunds.
Together with Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC, the Funds investment manager, and Pacific Investment Management Company LLC (PIMCO), the Funds sub-adviser, we thank you for investing with us.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hans W. Kertess |
|
Brian S. Shlissel |
Chairman |
|
President & Chief Executive Officer |
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 1
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Fund Insights/Performance & Statistics |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
For the six-month period ended November 30, 2008, PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II returned (38.16)% on net asset value and (41.34)% on market price, compared to (19.82)% and (27.73)%, respectively for the Lipper Analytical General Municipal Debt Funds Leveraged (the Benchmark) average. |
|
|
|
Municipal bond yields increased across the curve in all but the shortest maturities during the six-month period ended November 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
Duration hedging strategies significantly detracted from performance during the period. Thirty-year Treasury and London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) swaps rallied significantly, while municipal rates increased as investors moved away from risky assets. |
|
|
|
Municipal to Treasury yield ratios moved higher during the reporting period crossing all time high levels in September, while continuing higher in October and November, continually setting new records along the way. The 10-year ratio increased to 138% and 30-year ratio increased to 156%. |
|
|
|
Exposure to corporate backed munis detracted from performance as this sector underperformed during the period due to continued stress in the corporate sector. |
|
|
|
Tobacco securitization sector holdings detracted from performance as muni investors continue to focus demand on the highest quality sectors of the market while avoiding lower quality higher yielding securities such as tobacco bonds. |
|
|
|
Exposure to zero coupon municipals detracted from performance as their longer durations caused underperformance as rates moved higher during the reporting period, especially in the longer maturity portion of the yield curve. The Barclays Capital Zero Coupon Index returned (15.16)% for the six-month period ended November 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
The Fund was generally positioned with a significant portion of its exposure in longer dated maturities due to the attractiveness of that portion of the curve. This detracted from performance as the muni curve steepened significantly during the period with longer rates increasing and most investors buying in the shorter maturity portion of the curve. The 15-, 20-, and 30-year maturity AAA General Obligation yields increased by 72, 80, and 87 basis points respectively while the two-year yield decreased by 13 basis points. |
|
|
|
Long Municipals significantly underperformed Long Treasuries and also underperformed the taxable debt sector during the period as investors moved out of risky assets into Treasuries due to market volatility and continued uncertainty. The Barclays Capital Long Municipal Bond Index returned (14.77)% while the Long Government/Credit and the Long Barclays Capital Treasury Indices returned (1.36)% and 13.61%, respectively. |
|
|
|
Municipal bond issuance remains at increased levels; although there has been a slow down in the furious pace of the first half of the year beginning in September. Although issuance has been stalled somewhat, municipalities have picked up their issuance again in order to meet upcoming funding needs. During the six-month period, issuance totaled over $367.7 billion compared to $400.42 billion for the same period a year ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return(1): |
|
|
Market Price |
|
Net Asset Value (NAV) |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
(41.34 |
)% |
|
(38.16 |
)% |
1 Year |
|
|
(37.85 |
)% |
|
(38.63 |
)% |
5 Year |
|
|
(4.52 |
)% |
|
(5.01 |
)% |
Commencement of Operations (6/28/02) to 11/30/08 |
|
|
(3.31 |
)% |
|
(2.13 |
)% |
Common Share Market Price/NAV Performance:
Commencement of Operations (6/28/02) to 11/30/08
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price/NAV: |
|
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
NAV |
|
$ |
8.30 |
|
Discount to NAV |
|
|
(3.61 |
)% |
Market Price Yield(2) |
|
|
9.75 |
% |
|
Moodys Ratings |
|
(1) Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market share price (as applicable) in the period covered. The calculation assumes that all of the Funds income dividends and capital gain distributions have been reinvested. Total return does not reflect broker commissions or sales charges. Total return for a period of less than one year is not annualized. Total return for a period of more than one year represents the average annual total return.
The Funds performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market price returns typically reflect investment results over time, during shorter periods returns at market price can also be influenced by factors such as changing views about the Fund, market conditions, supply and demand for the Funds shares, or changes in Fund distributions.
An investment in the Fund involves risk, including the loss of principal. Total return, market price, market price yield and net asset value will fluctuate with changes in market conditions. This data is provided for information only and is not intended for trading purposes. Closed-end funds, unlike open-end funds, are not continuously offered. There is a one-time public offering, and once issued, shares of closed-end funds are sold in the open market through a stock exchange. Net asset value is equal to total assets attributable to common shareholders less total liabilities divided by the number of common shares outstanding. Holdings are subject to change daily.
(2) Market Price Yield is determined by dividing the annualized current monthly per share dividend (comprised from net investment income) payable to common shareholders by the market price per common share at November 30, 2008.
2 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Fund Insights/Performance & Statistics |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
For the six-month period ended November 30, 2008, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II returned (42.32)% on net asset value and (52.98)% on market price, compared to (52.96)% and (30.07)%, respectively for the Lipper California Municipal Debt FundsLeveraged (the Benchmark) average. |
|
|
|
Municipal bond yields increased across the curve in all but the shortest maturities during the six-month period ended November 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
Duration hedging strategies significantly detracted from performance during the reporting period. Thirty-year Treasury and London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) swaps rallied significantly, while municipal rates increased as investors moved away from risky assets. |
|
|
|
Municipal to Treasury yield ratios moved higher during the period crossing all time high levels in September, while continuing higher in October and November, continually setting new records along the way. The 10-year ratio increased to 138% and 30-year ratio increased to 156%. |
|
|
|
Exposure to hospital related munis detracted from performance as this sector underperformed the national market during the period. |
|
|
|
Tobacco securitization sector holdings detracted from Fund performance as muni investors continue to focus demand on the highest quality sectors of the market while avoiding lower quality higher yielding securities such as tobacco bonds. |
|
|
|
Exposure to zero coupon municipals detracted from Fund performance as their longer durations caused underperformance as rates moved higher during the period, especially in the longer maturity portion of the yield curve. The Barclays Capital Zero Coupon Index returned (15.16)% for the six-month period ended November 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
Long Municipals significantly underperformed Long Treasuries and also underperformed the taxable debt sector during the period as investors moved out of risky assets into Treasuries due to market volatility and continued uncertainty. The Barclays Capital Long Municipal Bond Index returned (14.17)% while the Long Government/Credit and the Long Barclays Capital Treasury Indices returned (1.36)% and 13.61%, respectively. |
|
|
|
Municipal bond issuance remains at increased levels; although we have seen a slow down in the furious pace of the first half of the year beginning in September. Although issuance has been stalled somewhat, municipalities have picked up their issuance again in order to meet upcoming funding needs. During the six-month period, issuance totaled over $367.7 billion compared to $400.42 billion for the same period a year ago. |
|
|
|
Municipal bonds within California underperformed the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index returning (6.33)% and (4.98)%, respectively for the period. Year-to-date, California continues to lead all other states in new issue volume. The states issuance has decreased 20% from the same period last year to $51.6 billion. |
|
|
|
The Fund was generally positioned with a significant portion of its exposure in longer dated maturities due to the attractiveness of that portion of the curve. This detracted from performance as long muni rates increased during this period. The shape of the California State AAA insured municipal yield curve steepened during the reporting period. Five-year maturity yields increased 26 basis points, 10-year yields increased 75 basis points, and 30-year yields increased 140 basis points. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return(1): |
|
|
Market Price |
|
Net Asset Value (NAV |
) |
|
Six Months |
|
|
(52.98 |
)% |
|
(42.32 |
)% |
1 Year |
|
|
(51.12 |
)% |
|
(42.63 |
)% |
5 Year |
|
|
(8.41 |
)% |
|
(6.36 |
)% |
Commencement of Operations (6/28/02) to 11/30/08 |
|
|
(6.54 |
)% |
|
(3.80 |
)% |
Common Share Market Price/NAV Performance:
Commencement of Operations (6/28/02) to 11/30/08
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price/NAV: |
|
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
6.44 |
|
NAV |
|
$ |
7.42 |
|
Discount to NAV |
|
|
(13.21 |
)% |
Market Price Yield(2) |
|
|
13.04 |
% |
|
Moodys Ratings |
|
(1) Past performance is no guarantee of future result. Returns are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market share price (as applicable) in the period covered. The calculation assumes that all of the Funds income dividends and capital gain distributions have been reinvested. Total return does not reflect broker commissions or sales charges. Total return for a period of less than one year is not annualized. Total return for a period of more than one year represents the average annual total return.
The Funds performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market price returns typically reflect investment results over time, during shorter periods returns at market price can also be influenced by factors such as changing views about the Fund, market conditions, supply and demand for the Funds shares, or changes in Fund distributions.
An investment in the Fund involves risk, including the loss of principal. Total return, market price, market price yield and net asset value will fluctuate with changes in market conditions. This data is provided for information only and is not intended for trading purposes. Closed-end funds, unlike open-end funds, are not continuously offered. There is a one-time public offering, and once issued, shares of closed-end funds are sold in the open market through a stock exchange. Net asset value is equal to total assets attributable to common shareholders less total liabilities divided by the number of common shares outstanding. Holdings are subject to change daily.
(2) Market Price Yield is determined by dividing the annualized current monthly per share dividend (comprised from net investment income) payable to common shareholders by the market price per common share at November 30, 2008.
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 3
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II Fund Insights/Performance & Statistics |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
For the six-month period ended November 30, 2008, PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II returned (32.61)% on net asset value and (41.51)% on market price, compared to (41.54)% and (32.08)%, respectively for the Lipper New York Municipal Debt FundsLeveraged (the Benchmark) average. |
|
|
|
Municipal bond yields increased across the curve in all but the shortest maturities during the six-month reporting period ended November 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
Duration hedging strategies significantly detracted from performance during the period. Thirty-year Treasury and London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) swaps rallied significantly, while municipal rates increased as investors moved away from risky assets. |
|
|
|
Municipal to Treasury yield ratios moved higher during the period crossing all time high levels in September, while continuing higher in October and November, continually setting new records along the way. The 10-year ratio increased to 138% and 30-year ratio increased to 156%. |
|
|
|
Exposure to hospital related munis detracted from performance as this sector underperformed the national market during the period. |
|
|
|
Tobacco securitization sector holdings detracted from performance as muni investors continue to focus demand on the highest quality sectors of the market while avoiding lower quality higher yielding securities such as tobacco bonds. |
|
|
|
Exposure to zero coupon municipals detracted from performance as their longer durations caused underperformance as rates moved higher during the period, especially in the longer maturity portion of the yield curve. The Barclays Capital Zero Coupon Index returned (15.16)% for the six-month period ended November 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
Long Municipals significantly underperformed Long Treasuries and also underperformed the taxable debt sector during the period as investors moved out of risky assets into Treasuries due to market volatility and continued uncertainty. The Barclays Capital Long Municipal Bond Index returned (14.77)% while the Long Government/Credit and the Long Barclays Capital Treasury Indices returned (1.36)% and 13.61%, respectively. |
|
|
|
Municipal bond issuance remains at increased levels; although we have seen a slow down in the furious pace of the first half of the year beginning in September. Although issuance has been stalled somewhat, municipalities have picked up their issuance again in order to meet upcoming funding needs. During the six-month period, issuance totaled over $367.7 billion compared to $400.42 billion for the same period a year ago. |
|
|
|
Municipal bonds within New York performed in-line with the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index returning (4.94)% and (4.98)%, respectively for the period. Year-to-date, issuers in New York State have issued $38.1 billion in bonds, 37.5% higher than the same period last year. New York now ranks second among states in terms of issuance. |
|
|
|
The Fund was generally positioned with a significant portion of its exposure in longer dated maturities due to the attractiveness of that portion of the curve. This detracted from performance as long muni rates increased over this period. The shape of the New York Insured AAA municipal yield curve steepened during the period. Five-year maturity AAA credits increased 17 basis points, 10-year maturities increased 57 basis points, and 30-year maturities increased 105 basis points. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return(1): |
|
|
Market Price |
|
Net Asset Value (NAV |
) |
|
Six Months |
|
|
(41.51 |
)% |
|
(32.61 |
)% |
1 Year |
|
|
(36.40 |
)% |
|
(32.32 |
)% |
5 Year |
|
|
(4.38 |
)% |
|
(3.30 |
)% |
Commencement of Operations (6/28/02) to 11/30/08 |
|
|
(3.25 |
)% |
|
(1.20 |
)% |
Common Share Market Price/NAV Performance:
Commencement of Operations (6/28/02) to 11/30/08
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price/NAV: |
|
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
8.14 |
|
NAV |
|
$ |
8.92 |
|
Discount to NAV |
|
|
(8.74 |
)% |
Market Price Yield(2) |
|
|
9.77 |
% |
|
Moodys Ratings |
|
(1) Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market share price (as applicable) in the period covered. The calculation assumes that all of the Funds income dividends and capital gain distributions have been reinvested. Total return does not reflect broker commissions or sales charges. Total return for a period of less than one year is not annualized. Total return for a period of more than one year represents the average annual total return.
The Funds performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market price returns typically reflect investment results over time, during shorter periods returns at market price can also be influenced by factors such as changing views about the Fund, market conditions, supply and demand for the Funds shares, or changes in Fund distributions.
An investment in the Fund involves risk, including the loss of principal. Total return, market price, market price yield and net asset value will fluctuate with changes in market conditions. This data is provided for information only and is not intended for trading purposes. Closed-end funds, unlike open-end funds, are not continuously offered. There is a one-time public offering, and once issued, shares of closed-end funds are sold in the open market through a stock exchange. Net asset value is equal to total assets attributable to common shareholders less total liabilities divided by the number of common shares outstanding. Holdings are subject to change daily.
(2) Market Price Yield is determined by dividing the annualized current monthly per share dividend (comprised from net investment income) payable to common shareholders by the market price per common share at November 30, 2008.
4 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
MUNICIPAL BONDS & NOTES92.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Alabama2.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
Birmingham Baptist Medical Centers Special Care Facs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Auth. Rev., 5.00%, 11/15/30, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa1/NR |
|
|
$ 6,781,000 |
|
|
1,750 |
|
Huntsville Health Care Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 6/1/32, Ser. B, (Pre-refunded @ $101, 6/1/12) (c) |
|
|
A2/NR |
|
|
1,939,070 |
|
|
13,580 |
|
Jefferson Cnty. Sewer Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.75%, 2/1/38, Ser. B, (Pre-refunded @ $100, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/1/12) (FGIC)(c) |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
14,519,329 |
|
|
|
|
Montgomery BMC Special Care Facs. Financing Auth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rev. (MBIA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
5.00%, 11/15/29, Ser. B |
|
|
A3/AA |
|
|
1,073,832 |
|
|
2,200 |
|
Baptist Health, 5.00%, 11/15/24 |
|
|
A3/AA |
|
|
2,185,612 |
|
|
2,650 |
|
Tuscaloosa Educational Building Auth. Rev., Stillman College, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/26 |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
1,854,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,352,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Alaska0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
Northern Tobacco Securitization Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/46, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
3,280,872 |
|
|
3,550 |
|
State Housing Finance Corp. Rev., 5.25%, 6/1/32, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ser. C (MBIA) |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
3,033,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,314,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Arizona6.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
Beatitudes Project, 5.20%, 10/1/37 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,940,755 |
|
|
1,300 |
|
Hospital System, 5.75%, 12/1/32, (Pre-refunded @ $101, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/1/12) (c) |
|
|
NR/BBB |
|
|
1,447,251 |
|
|
|
|
Pima Cnty. Industrial Dev. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
Center for Academic Success, 5.50%, 7/1/37 (a)(d) |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
2,378,880 |
|
|
29,700 |
|
Correctional Facs., 5.00%, 9/1/39 |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
25,572,294 |
|
|
41,100 |
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power Dist. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 1/1/37, Ser. A (h) |
|
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
37,234,956 |
|
|
10,500 |
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp. Rev., 5.00%, 12/1/37 |
|
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
6,725,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,299,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Arkansas0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
Arkansas Dev. Finance Auth. Rev., zero coupon, 7/1/46, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AMBAC) |
|
|
Aa3/NR |
|
|
1,292,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
California4.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,610 |
|
Alameda Corridor Transportation Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zero coupon, 10/1/16, Ser. A (AMBAC) |
|
|
A3/AA |
|
|
6,685,389 |
|
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Rev., Ser. A-1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
5.00%, 6/1/33, |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
3,763,560 |
|
|
9,000 |
|
6.75%, 6/1/39, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 6/1/13) (c) |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
10,287,090 |
|
|
|
|
State, GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,600 |
|
5.00%, 11/1/37 (h) |
|
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
23,822,084 |
|
|
9,550 |
|
5.00%, 12/1/37 |
|
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
7,954,099 |
|
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 5
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
California(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,700 |
|
Statewide Community Dev. Auth. Rev., Baptist Univ., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.00%, 11/1/17, Ser. B (a)(d) |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
$ 4,335,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,847,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Colorado4.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,250 |
|
Denver City & Cnty. Rev., 5.00%, 11/15/25, Ser. B (FSA) |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
10,363,725 |
|
|
|
|
E-470 Public Highway Auth. Rev., Ser. B (MBIA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
zero coupon, 9/1/35 |
|
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
2,647,600 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
zero coupon, 9/1/37 |
|
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
1,708,050 |
|
|
|
|
Health Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
American Baptist Homes, 5.90%, 8/1/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
666,240 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
Catholic Health Initiatives, 5.50%, 3/1/32 |
|
|
NR/AA |
|
|
25,669,000 |
|
|
18,305 |
|
Exempla, Inc., 5.625%, 1/1/33, Ser. A |
|
|
A1/A- |
|
|
14,808,928 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Housing & Finance Auth. Rev., Evergreen Country Day School, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.875%, 6/1/37 (a)(d) |
|
|
NR/BB |
|
|
1,403,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,266,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Florida3.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
Dev. Finance Corp. Rev., Learning Gate Community School, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 2/15/37 |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
1,683,805 |
|
|
2,335 |
|
Hillsborough Cnty. Industrial Dev. Auth. Pollution Control Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa Electric Co., 5.50%, 10/1/23 |
|
|
Baa2/BBB- |
|
|
1,980,524 |
|
|
7,135 |
|
Jacksonville Health Facs. Auth. Rev., 5.25%, 11/15/32, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
6,078,949 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
Leesburg Hospital Rev., Leesburg Regional Medical Center |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project, 5.50%, 7/1/32 |
|
|
Baa1/BBB+ |
|
|
2,207,280 |
|
|
|
|
Orange Cnty. Health Facs. Auth. Rev., Adventist Health |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
5.625%, 11/15/32, (Pre-refunded @ $101, 11/15/12) (c) |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,824,252 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
6.25%, 11/15/24, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 11/15/12) (c) |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
5,608,900 |
|
|
500 |
|
Sarasota Cnty. Health Fac. Auth. Rev., 5.75%, 7/1/37 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
325,045 |
|
|
6,205 |
|
State Governmental Utility Auth. Rev., Barefoot Bay Utilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System, 5.00%, 10/1/29 (AMBAC) |
|
|
Baa1/NR |
|
|
5,610,747 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Sumter Landing Community Dev. Dist. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.75%, 10/1/35, Ser. A (MBIA) |
|
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
4,017,500 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
Tallahassee Rev., 5.00%, 10/1/37, Ser. 2617 (h) |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
9,080,300 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Winter Springs Water & Sewer Rev., zero coupon, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/1/29 (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
|
NR/AA |
|
|
453,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,870,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Georgia0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,775 |
|
Medical Center Hospital Auth. Rev., 5.25%, 7/1/37 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,693,055 |
|
|
9,600 |
|
Richmond Cnty. Dev. Auth. Rev., zero coupon, 12/1/21 |
|
|
Aaa/NR |
|
|
4,951,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,644,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Hawaii1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,170 |
|
Honolulu City & Cnty. Wastewater System Rev., First Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolution, 4.75%, 7/1/28 (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
|
Aa3/NR |
|
|
17,097,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Illinois19.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Lake Cnty. JT Action Water Agcy. Rev., Ser. A (AMBAC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
5.125%, 5/1/28 |
|
|
Aa3/NR |
|
|
2,894,057 |
|
|
675 |
|
5.125%, 5/1/28 (Pre-refunded @ $100, 11/1/12) (c) |
|
|
Aa3/NR |
|
|
741,670 |
|
6 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
Illinois(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, GO (FGIC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,635 |
|
5.125%, 1/1/29, Ser. A |
|
|
Aa3/AAA |
|
|
$ 1,536,377 |
|
|
4,065 |
|
5.50%, 1/1/40 |
|
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
3,912,725 |
|
|
|
|
Chicago, Lake Shore East, Special Assessment, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,162 |
|
6.625%, 12/1/22 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,740,063 |
|
|
6,700 |
|
6.75%, 12/1/32 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
5,438,323 |
|
|
|
|
Chicago Board of Education School Reform, GO (MBIA-FGIC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,535 |
|
zero coupon, 12/1/16, Ser. A |
|
|
A1/AA |
|
|
10,599,064 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
zero coupon, 12/1/28, Ser. A |
|
|
A1/AA |
|
|
1,370,600 |
|
|
4,500 |
|
zero coupon, 12/1/31 |
|
|
A1/AA |
|
|
988,065 |
|
|
|
|
Chicago City Colleges, GO (FGIC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,670 |
|
zero coupon, 1/1/37 |
|
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
5,262,157 |
|
|
29,145 |
|
zero coupon, 1/1/38 |
|
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
4,374,082 |
|
|
32,670 |
|
zero coupon, 1/1/39 |
|
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
4,566,939 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Cicero, GO, 5.25%, 12/1/31 (MBIA) |
|
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
4,831,650 |
|
|
6,440 |
|
Cook Cnty., GO, 5.00%, 11/15/28, Ser. A (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
6,112,461 |
|
|
|
|
Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Christian Homes, Inc., 5.75%, 5/15/31, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,690,300 |
|
|
250 |
|
Leafs Hockey Club, 6.00%, 3/1/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
168,825 |
|
|
|
|
Regency Park, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
zero coupon, 7/15/23 |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
4,628,800 |
|
|
122,650 |
|
zero coupon, 7/15/25 |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
49,386,249 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Sedgebrook, Inc., 6.00%, 11/15/42, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,009,380 |
|
|
|
|
Health Facs. Auth. Rev, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Condell Medical Center, 5.50%, 5/15/32 |
|
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
3,524,200 |
|
|
20,100 |
|
Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare, 5.625%, 1/1/28 |
|
|
Baa1/NR |
|
|
16,554,762 |
|
|
|
|
Hillside, Tax Allocation, Mannheim Redev. Project, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
6.55%, 1/1/20 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,895,200 |
|
|
2,900 |
|
7.00%, 1/1/28 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,353,002 |
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Auth. Rev. (MBIA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
zero coupon, 12/15/30 |
|
|
A1/AAA |
|
|
15,037,800 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
zero coupon, 12/15/33 |
|
|
A1/AAA |
|
|
10,106,500 |
|
|
2,460 |
|
zero coupon, 6/15/38 |
|
|
A1/AAA |
|
|
362,506 |
|
|
68,470 |
|
State Sports Facs. Auth. Rev. zero coupon, 6/15/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(converts to 5.50% on 6/16/10) (AMBAC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
58,689,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,774,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Indiana0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,125 |
|
Fort Wayne Pollution Control Rev., 6.20%, 10/15/25 |
|
|
Caa3/CCC+ |
|
|
613,883 |
|
|
990 |
|
Vigo Cnty. Hospital Auth. Rev., 5.80%, 9/1/47 (a)(d) |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
633,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Iowa3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deerfield Retirement Community, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
5.50%, 11/15/27, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
153,868 |
|
|
1,075 |
|
5.50%, 11/15/37 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
604,343 |
|
|
4,500 |
|
Edgewater LLC, 6.75%, 11/15/42 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,276,810 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Wedum Walnut Ridge LLC, 5.625%, 12/1/45, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
570,230 |
|
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 7
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
Iowa(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tobacco Settlement Auth. of Iowa Rev., Ser. B, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,000 |
|
5.60%, 6/1/34, |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
$ 32,240,480 |
|
|
7,050 |
|
5.60%, 6/1/35, (Pre-refunded @ $101, 6/1/11) (c) |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
7,626,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,472,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Kansas0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
Univ. of Kansas Hospital Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.625%, 9/1/32, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 9/1/12) (c) |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
3,109,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Kentucky0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Economic Dev. Finance Auth. Rev., Hospital Facs. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare Partners, 5.25%, 10/1/30 |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
2,153,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Louisiana4.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Facs. Auth. Rev., Ochsner Clinic Foundation, Ser. B, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,400 |
|
5.50%, 5/15/32, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 5/15/26) (c) |
|
|
Aaa/NR |
|
|
21,651,132 |
|
|
3,300 |
|
5.50%, 5/15/47 |
|
|
A3/NR |
|
|
2,424,147 |
|
|
44,395 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. Rev., 5.875%, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/15/39, Ser. B |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
32,175,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,250,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Maryland0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Higher Educational Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
5.30%, 1/1/37 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
543,370 |
|
|
4,050 |
|
6.00%, 1/1/43 |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
2,878,173 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Adventist Healthcare, 5.75%, 1/1/25, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa2/NR |
|
|
796,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,217,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Massachusetts6.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
Boston Rev., 5.00%, 11/1/28, Ser. D (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
|
Aa2/AA+ |
|
|
6,776,700 |
|
|
4,610 |
|
Dev. Finance Agcy. Rev., 6.75%, 10/15/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,291,632 |
|
|
12,050 |
|
State Water Res. Auth. Rev., 4.75%, 8/1/37, Ser. A (FSA)(h) |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
10,171,526 |
|
|
|
|
State Turnpike Auth. Rev., Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
4.75%, 1/1/34 (AMBAC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
3,262,997 |
|
|
51,830 |
|
5.00%, 1/1/37 (MBIA) |
|
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
40,473,529 |
|
|
10,325 |
|
5.00%, 1/1/39 (AMBAC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
7,924,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,901,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Michigan2.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,545 |
|
Garden City Hospital Finance Auth. Rev., 5.00%, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/15/38, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,495,614 |
|
|
800 |
|
Public Educational Facs. Auth. Rev., 6.50%, 9/1/37 (a)(d) |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
610,352 |
|
|
500 |
|
Star International Academy, CP, 6.125%, 3/1/37 |
|
|
NR/BB+ |
|
|
355,790 |
|
|
|
|
State Hospital Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Ascension Health, 5.25%, 11/15/26, Ser. B |
|
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
4,456,900 |
|
|
|
|
Oakwood Group, Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
5.75%, 4/1/32 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
11,397,780 |
|
|
1,925 |
|
6.00%, 4/1/22 |
|
|
A2/A |
|
|
1,863,131 |
|
|
6,000 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Finance Auth. Rev., 6.00%, 6/1/48, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/BBB |
|
|
3,828,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,008,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Minnesota0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
Meeker Cnty. Rev., 5.75%, 11/1/37 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
903,760 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Minneapolis Rev., Providence Project, 5.75%, 10/1/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
965,745 |
|
8 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
Minnesota(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
Minneapolis, Tax Allocation, Grant Park Project, 5.35%, 2/1/30 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
$ 191,962 |
|
|
|
|
North Oaks Presbyterian Homes Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
6.00%, 10/1/33 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,931,741 |
|
|
1,530 |
|
6.125%, 10/1/39 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,109,724 |
|
|
500 |
|
Oronoco Multifamily Housing Rev., 5.40%, 6/1/41 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
300,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,403,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Mississippi0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,605 |
|
Business Finance Corp., Pollution Control Rev., 5.875%, 4/1/22 |
|
|
Ba1/BBB |
|
|
2,851,014 |
|
|
740 |
|
Dev. Bank Special Obligation Projects & Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions Rev., 5.00%, 7/1/24 (AMBAC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
637,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,488,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Missouri0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
Branson Regional Airport Transportation Dev. Dist. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 7/1/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,679,392 |
|
|
740 |
|
Hanley Road & North of Folk Ave. Transportation Dist. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/1/25 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
542,028 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
St. Louis Parking Rev., Downtown Parking Facs., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 2/1/28, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 2/1/12) (c) |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,646,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,867,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Nevada0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
Clark Cnty., GO, 5.00%, 6/1/31 (FGIC) |
|
|
Aa1/AA+ |
|
|
1,332,550 |
|
|
1,620 |
|
State, GO, 5.00%, 5/15/28 (FGIC) |
|
|
Aa1/AAA |
|
|
1,475,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,807,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
New Hampshire0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Education Facs. Auth. Rev., Catholic Medical Center, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
6.125%, 7/1/32 |
|
|
Baa1/BBB+ |
|
|
263,232 |
|
|
2,640 |
|
6.125%, 7/1/32, (Pre-refunded @ $101, 7/1/12) (c) |
|
|
Baa1/BBB+ |
|
|
3,003,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,266,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
New Jersey2.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950 |
|
Burlington Cnty. Bridge Commission Rev., 5.625%, 1/1/38 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
627,437 |
|
|
|
|
Economic Dev. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arbor Glen, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525 |
|
6.00%, 5/15/28 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
402,775 |
|
|
225 |
|
6.00%, 5/15/28, Ser. A, (Pre-refunded @ $102, 5/15/09) (c) |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
234,412 |
|
|
|
|
Kapkowski Road Landfill, Special Assessment, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
5.75%, 10/1/21 |
|
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
3,461,920 |
|
|
11,405 |
|
5.75%, 4/1/31 |
|
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
8,905,138 |
|
|
1,100 |
|
Seabrook Village, 5.25%, 11/15/36 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
665,885 |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Facs. Financing Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
St. Peters Univ. Hospital, 5.75%, 7/1/37 |
|
|
Baa2/BBB- |
|
|
1,113,615 |
|
|
1,830 |
|
Trinitas Hospital, 5.25%, 7/1/30, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
1,290,607 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
State Educational Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fairfield Dickinson Univ., 6.00%, 7/1/25, Ser. D |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,805,810 |
|
|
|
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,150 |
|
5.00%, 6/1/41, Ser. 1A |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
7,361,107 |
|
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 9
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
New Jersey(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,285 |
|
6.00%, 6/1/37, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 6/1/12) (c) |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
$ 1,438,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,307,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
New Mexico0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Farmington Pollution Control Rev., 5.80%, 4/1/22 |
|
|
Baa3/BB+ |
|
|
3,924,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
New York1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
Erie Cnty. Industrial Dev. Agcy., Orchard Park Rev., 6.00%, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/15/36 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
800,880 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
Liberty Dev. Corp. Rev., 5.25%, 10/1/35 (h) |
|
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
7,156,000 |
|
|
1,100 |
|
Nassau Cnty. Industrial Dev. Agcy. Rev., Amsterdam at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harborside, 6.70%, 1/1/43, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
832,777 |
|
|
2,830 |
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/15/37, Ser. D (h) |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
2,562,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,352,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
North Carolina0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Care Commission Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 |
|
Salemtowne, 5.10%, 10/1/30 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
339,587 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Village at Brookwood, 5.25%, 1/1/32 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
637,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
976,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
North Dakota0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,710 |
|
Stark Cnty. Healthcare Rev., Benedictine Living Communities, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75%, 1/1/33 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,761,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Ohio0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
Lorain Cnty. Hospital Rev., Catholic Healthcare, 5.375%, 10/1/30 |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
6,571,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Pennsylvania5.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allegheny Cnty. Hospital Dev. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,600 |
|
5.375%, 11/15/40, Ser. A |
|
|
Ba3/BB |
|
|
12,740,298 |
|
|
470 |
|
9.25%, 11/15/15, Ser. B, (Pre-refunded @ $102, 11/15/10) (c) |
|
|
Ba3/AAA |
|
|
529,314 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
9.25%, 11/15/22, Ser. B, (Pre-refunded @ $102, 11/15/10) (c) |
|
|
Ba3/AAA |
|
|
1,142,980 |
|
|
5,700 |
|
9.25%, 11/15/30, Ser. B, (Pre-refunded @ $102, 11/15/10) (c) |
|
|
Ba3/AAA |
|
|
6,514,986 |
|
|
|
|
Cumberland Cnty. Auth., Retirement Community Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messiah Village, Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
5.625%, 7/1/28 |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
556,252 |
|
|
670 |
|
6.00%, 7/1/35 |
|
|
NR/BBB- |
|
|
498,333 |
|
|
4,500 |
|
Wesley Affiliated Services, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25%, 1/1/35, Ser. A, (Pre-refunded @ $101, 1/1/13) (c) |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
5,253,525 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
Harrisburg Auth. Rev., 6.00%, 9/1/36 |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,367,235 |
|
|
|
|
Montgomery Cnty. Higher Education & Health Auth. Hospital Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abington Memorial Hospital, Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
5.125%, 6/1/27 |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
4,052,150 |
|
|
3,750 |
|
5.125%, 6/1/32 |
|
|
NR/A |
|
|
2,858,175 |
|
|
11,600 |
|
Philadelphia Hospitals & Higher Education Facs. Auth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temple Univ. Hospital, 6.625%, 11/15/23, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
9,449,012 |
|
|
17,000 |
|
Philadelphia, GO, 5.25%, 12/15/32, Ser. A (FSA) |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
15,260,390 |
|
|
500 |
|
Pittsburgh & Allegheny Cntys. Public Auditorium Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/1/29 (AMBAC) |
|
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
469,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,691,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
|||
|
|
|
Rhode Island4.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,200 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. Rev., 6.25%, 6/1/42, Ser. A |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
$ 56,094,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
South Carolina3.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jobs-Economic Dev. Auth. Rev., Bon Secours, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,850 |
|
5.625%, 11/15/30 |
|
|
A3/A- |
|
|
11,467,938 |
|
|
3,770 |
|
5.625%, 11/15/30, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 11/15/12) (c) |
|
|
A3/A- |
|
|
4,201,439 |
|
|
|
|
Lexington Cnty. Health Services Dist. Hospital Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
5.50%, 11/1/32, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 11/1/13) (c) |
|
|
A2/A+ |
|
|
12,113,172 |
|
|
3,400 |
|
5.50%, 5/1/37, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 5/1/14) (c) |
|
|
A2/A+ |
|
|
3,836,016 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Rev. Management Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.375%, 5/15/28, Ser. B, (Pre-refunded @ $101, 5/11/15) (c) |
|
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
3,492,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,111,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Tennessee0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Energy Acquisition Corp. Rev., 5.00%, 2/1/23, Ser. C |
|
|
Baa1/AA- |
|
|
2,020,980 |
|
|
3,750 |
|
Knox Cnty. Health Educational & Housing Facs. Board Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 10/1/30 |
|
|
A1/AA- |
|
|
3,230,775 |
|
|
500 |
|
Sullivan Cnty. Health Educational & Housing Facs. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 9/1/36, Ser. C |
|
|
NR/BBB+ |
|
|
324,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,576,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Texas9.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Arlington Independent School Dist., GO, 5.00%, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/15/24 (PSF-GTD) |
|
|
Aaa/NR |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
Aubrey Independent School Dist., GO (PSF-GTD), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
5.50%, 2/15/33 |
|
|
Aaa/NR |
|
|
131,892 |
|
|
4,350 |
|
5.50%, 2/15/33, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 8/15/14) (c) |
|
|
Aaa/NR |
|
|
4,947,429 |
|
|
6,500 |
|
Brazos Cnty. Health Facs. Dev. Corp. Rev., Franciscan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services Corp., 5.375%, 1/1/32 |
|
|
NR/A- |
|
|
4,754,165 |
|
|
2,700 |
|
Comal Cnty. Health Facs. Dev. Rev., McKenna Memorial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital Project, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 2/1/32, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 2/1/13) (c) |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
3,082,752 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
Frisco Independent School Dist., GO, zero coupon, 8/15/34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(PSF-GTD) |
|
|
Aaa/NR |
|
|
3,912,800 |
|
|
700 |
|
HFDC of Central Texas, Inc. Rev., Village at Gleannloch Farms, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 2/15/37, Ser. A |
|
|
NR/NR |
|
|
431,249 |
|
|
5,500 |
|
Houston Rev., 5.00%, 7/1/25, Ser. C (FGIC) |
|
|
A1/AA |
|
|
4,912,930 |
|
|
770 |
|
Keller Independent School Dist., GO, 4.875%, 8/15/31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(PSF-GTD) |
|
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
699,622 |
|
|
3,170 |
|
Little Elm Independent School Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.30%, 8/15/29, Ser. A (PSF-GTD) |
|
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
3,173,645 |
|
|
6,250 |
|
North Dallas Thruway Auth. Rev., 4.75%, 1/1/29 (FGIC) |
|
|
A2/AA |
|
|
5,451,000 |
|
|
|
|
North Harris Cnty. Regional Water Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
5.25%, 12/15/33 |
|
|
A3/A+ |
|
|
8,872,832 |
|
|
10,300 |
|
5.50%, 12/15/38 |
|
|
A3/A+ |
|
|
9,016,517 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
North Texas Tollway Auth. Rev., 5.625%, 1/1/33, Ser. B |
|
|
A2/A- |
|
|
4,472,450 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Sabine River Auth. Rev., 5.20%, 5/1/28 |
|
|
Caa1/CCC |
|
|
1,019,980 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
San Antonio Electric & Gas Sys Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/1/32, Ser. 3247 (h) |
|
|
Aa1/NR |
|
|
9,263,300 |
|
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 11
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
Texas(continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State, Mobility Fund, GO (h), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
4.75%, 4/1/36 |
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
$ 15,323,350 |
|
|
10,025 |
|
4.75%, 4/1/35, Ser. A |
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
9,000,746 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
State Public Finance Auth. Rev., 5.875%, 12/1/36, Ser. A |
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
729,430 |
|
|
|
|
State Turnpike Auth. Central Turnpike System Rev., Ser. A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AMBAC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
zero coupon, 8/15/19 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
5,378,000 |
|
|
8,880 |
|
5.00%, 8/15/42 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
6,409,229 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
State Water Financial Assistance, GO, 5.00%, 8/1/36 |
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
2,925,552 |
|
|
4,150 |
|
Willacy Cnty. Rev., 6.875%, 9/1/28, Ser. A-1 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,964,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,883,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Virginia0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
James City Cnty. Economic Dev. Auth. Rev., 5.50%, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/1/37, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,274,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Washington1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
Health Care Facs. Auth. Rev., Virginia Mason Medical Center, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.125%, 8/15/37, Ser. A |
|
Baa2/BBB |
|
|
9,127,560 |
|
|
6,800 |
|
State Housing Finance Commission Rev., Skyline at First Hill, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.625%, 1/1/38, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
4,194,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,322,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Wisconsin0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Badger Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
6.00%, 6/1/17 |
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
1,088,719 |
|
|
7,080 |
|
6.125%, 6/1/27 |
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
6,691,308 |
|
|
|
|
Health & Educational Facs. Auth. Rev., Froedert & Community |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Oblig., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
5.375%, 10/1/30 |
|
NR/AA- |
|
|
78,951 |
|
|
910 |
|
5.375%, 10/1/30, (Pre-refunded @ $101, 10/1/11) (c) |
|
NR/AA- |
|
|
991,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,850,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds & Notes (cost$1,243,526,036) |
|
|
|
|
1,083,655,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VARIABLE RATE NOTES (f)1.2% |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Florida0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,830 |
|
Highlands Cnty. Health Facs. Auth. Rev., Adventist Health System, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/15/31, Ser. C |
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
2,270,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Illinois0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
State, GO, 8.12%, 4/1/27, Ser. 783 (FSA)(a)(d)(e) |
|
Aaa/NR |
|
|
5,017,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Massachusetts0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
State, GO, 1.10%, 11/1/30, Ser. 785 (FGIC-TCRS)(a)(d)(e) |
|
Aa2/NR |
|
|
3,018,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Washington0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,550 |
|
Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Auth. Sales Tax & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motor Rev., 3.27%, 2/1/28, Ser. 360 (FGIC)(a)(d)(e) |
|
Aa2/NR |
|
|
3,797,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Variable Rate Notes (cost$14,778,778) |
|
|
|
|
14,104,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
||
U.S. TREASURY BILLS (g)6.1% |
|
||||||||
$ |
71,160 |
|
0.01%-1.10%,12/11/08-2/26/09 (cost$71,150,807) |
|
|
|
|
$ 71,150,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (cost$1,329,455,621)100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ 1,168,910,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 13
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
||
CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL BONDS & NOTES90.1% |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
ABC Unified School Dist., GO, zero coupon, 8/1/23, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ser. B (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
$ 831,140 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Alpine Union School Dist., GO, zero coupon, 8/1/24, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ser. B (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
432,780 |
|
|
|
|
Assoc. of Bay Area Govt Finance Auth. Rev., Odd Fellows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home (CA Mtg. Ins.), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
5.20%, 11/15/22 |
|
NR/A+ |
|
|
5,141,318 |
|
|
26,000 |
|
5.35%, 11/15/32 |
|
NR/A+ |
|
|
23,453,040 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Bay Area Govt Assoc., Lease Rev., 5.00%, 7/1/32, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ser. 2002-1 (AMBAC) |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
1,777,040 |
|
|
1,945 |
|
Bay Area Govt Assoc., Special Assessment, Windmere |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ranch Dist., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.30%, 9/2/25, (Pre-refunded @ $102, 9/2/11) (c) |
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
2,208,761 |
|
|
1,085 |
|
Capistrano Unified School Dist., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Tax, 5.70%, 9/1/20, (Pre-refunded @ $102, 9/1/09) (c) |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,144,252 |
|
|
2,300 |
|
Ceres Unified School Dist., GO, zero coupon, 8/1/27 (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
695,888 |
|
|
1,160 |
|
Chula Vista Dist., Special Tax, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.05%, 9/1/25, (Pre-refunded @ $102, 9/1/10) (c) |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,267,161 |
|
|
|
|
Chula Vista Community Facs. Dist., Special Tax, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastlake Woods, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
6.15%, 9/1/26 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,463,376 |
|
|
4,380 |
|
6.20%, 9/1/33 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,438,388 |
|
|
2,880 |
|
Otay Ranch Village, 5.125%, 9/1/36 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,929,485 |
|
|
|
|
Clovis Unified School Dist., GO, Ser. B (MBIA-FGIC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/23 |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
818,260 |
|
|
3,535 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/25 |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
1,246,017 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/27 |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
760,625 |
|
|
1,410 |
|
Community College Financing Auth. Lease Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/1/27, Ser. A (AMBAC) |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
1,219,269 |
|
|
|
|
Coronado Community Dev. Agcy., Tax Allocation (AMBAC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,945 |
|
4.875%, 9/1/35 |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
7,893,545 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
4.875%, 9/1/35 (h) |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
7,937,200 |
|
|
|
|
Corona-Norco Unified School Dist. Public Financing Auth., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Tax, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
5.10%, 9/1/25 (AMBAC) |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
1,041,435 |
|
|
210 |
|
5.55%, 9/1/15, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
198,238 |
|
|
305 |
|
5.65%, 9/1/16, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
285,507 |
|
|
160 |
|
5.75%, 9/1/17, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
148,346 |
|
|
530 |
|
6.00%, 9/1/20, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
465,377 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
6.00%, 9/1/25, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
787,160 |
|
|
4,150 |
|
6.10%, 9/1/32, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,284,725 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
Dinuba Financing Auth. Lease Rev., 5.10%, 8/1/32 (MBIA) |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
2,876,490 |
|
|
|
|
Educational Facs. Auth. Rev., Loyola Marymount Univ., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,475 |
|
zero coupon, 10/1/34, Ser. A (MBIA) |
|
A2/NR |
|
|
662,648 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Woodbury Univ., 5.00%, 1/1/36 |
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
1,309,500 |
|
14 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
Empire Union School Dist., Special Tax (AMBAC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,560 |
|
zero coupon, 10/1/30 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
$ 362,201 |
|
|
1,265 |
|
zero coupon, 10/1/32 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
262,488 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Escondido Union School Dist., GO, zero coupon, 8/1/27 (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
321,170 |
|
|
2,440 |
|
Eureka Union School Dist., GO, zero coupon, 8/1/27 (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
762,671 |
|
|
|
|
Foothill Eastern Corridor Agcy. Toll Road Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,100 |
|
zero coupon, 1/1/25, Ser. A |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
2,967,587 |
|
|
3,270 |
|
zero coupon, 1/1/26, Ser. A |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
1,290,309 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
zero coupon, 1/15/27 (MBIA-IBC) |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
1,224,210 |
|
|
1,440 |
|
Fremont Community Dist., Special Tax, 5.30%, 9/1/30 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,039,781 |
|
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
zero coupon, 6/1/37, Ser. A-2 |
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
844,980 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
5.00%, 6/1/33, Ser. A-1 |
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
5,018,080 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
5.00%, 6/1/35, Ser. A (FGIC) (h) |
|
A2/A |
|
|
7,674,400 |
|
|
45,000 |
|
5.00%, 6/1/38, Ser. A (FGIC) (h) |
|
A2/A |
|
|
32,496,300 |
|
|
11,985 |
|
5.00%, 6/1/45, Ser. A (AMBAC-TCRS) |
|
A2/AA |
|
|
8,578,264 |
|
|
6,000 |
|
5.00%, 6/1/45, Ser. A (FGIC-TCRS) |
|
A2/A |
|
|
4,201,620 |
|
|
995 |
|
6.25%, 6/1/33, Ser. A-1 |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
1,057,317 |
|
|
31,200 |
|
6.75%, 6/1/39, Ser. A-1, (Pre-refunded @ $100, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/1/13) (c) |
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
35,661,912 |
|
|
|
|
Health Facs. Finance Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Adventist Health System, 5.00%, 3/1/33 |
|
NR/A |
|
|
3,070,560 |
|
|
495 |
|
Catholic Healthcare West, 5.00%, 7/1/28, |
|
A2/A |
|
|
379,947 |
|
|
2,115 |
|
Hope Rehabilitation, 5.375%, 11/1/20 (CA Mtg. Ins.) |
|
NR/A+ |
|
|
1,950,072 |
|
|
|
|
Paradise VY Estates (CA Mtg. Ins.), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,500 |
|
5.125%, 1/1/22 |
|
NR/A+ |
|
|
4,854,685 |
|
|
3,875 |
|
5.25%, 1/1/26 |
|
NR/A+ |
|
|
3,309,715 |
|
|
1,750 |
|
Huntington Beach Community Facs. Dist., Special Tax, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.30%, 9/1/32 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,409,397 |
|
|
200 |
|
Infrastructure & Economic Dev. Bank Rev., Bay Area Toll |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bridges, 5.00%, 7/1/36, (Pre-refunded @ $100, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/1/28) (AMBAC)(c) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
202,702 |
|
|
7,000 |
|
Irvine Improvement Board Act 1915, Special Assessment, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.70%, 9/2/26 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
5,388,250 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Irvine Unified School Dist., Special Tax, 5.125%, 9/1/36, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
672,360 |
|
|
1,900 |
|
Jurupa Unified School Dist., GO, zero coupon, 5/1/27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MBIA-FGIC) |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
567,625 |
|
|
2,450 |
|
Kings Canyon JT Unified School Dist., GO, zero coupon, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/1/27 (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
772,754 |
|
|
5,300 |
|
Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/1/31, Ser. A (AMBAC) |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
4,604,587 |
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CP (MBIA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,895 |
|
5.00%, 2/1/27 |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
9,461,896 |
|
|
2,685 |
|
5.00%, 10/1/27, Ser. AU |
|
A2/AA |
|
|
2,549,703 |
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
4.75%, 7/1/30, Ser. A-2 (FSA)(h) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
12,856,050 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
5.00%, 7/1/35, Ser. A (FSA)(h) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
26,537,400 |
|
|
16,950 |
|
5.125%, 7/1/41, Ser. A (FGIC-TCRS) |
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
15,068,380 |
|
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 15
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
||
$ |
1,000 |
|
Manhattan Beach Unified School Dist., GO, zero coupon, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/25 (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
$ 368,610 |
|
|
|
|
Manteca Redev. Agcy., Tax Allocation, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,295 |
|
5.00%, 10/1/32 (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
6,556,965 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
5.00%, 10/1/36 (AMBAC) |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
8,481,100 |
|
|
|
|
Manteca Unified School Dist., Special Tax (MBIA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
zero coupon, 9/1/25 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
798,826 |
|
|
5,330 |
|
5.00%, 9/1/29, Ser. C |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
4,817,094 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
Merced Cnty., CP, Juvenile Justice Correctional Fac., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/32 (AMBAC) |
|
A3/NR |
|
|
3,527,880 |
|
|
|
|
Modesto Elementary School Dist. Stanislaus Cnty., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ser. A (MBIA-FGIC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,615 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/23 |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
1,110,146 |
|
|
2,705 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/24 |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
1,068,448 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
zero coupon, 5/1/27 |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
646,380 |
|
|
2,150 |
|
Modesto High School Dist. Stanislaus Cnty., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zero coupon, 8/1/26, Ser. A (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
722,615 |
|
|
2,385 |
|
Monrovia Financing Auth. Lease Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hillside Wilderness Preserve, 5.125%, 12/1/31 (AMBAC) |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
2,121,648 |
|
|
|
|
Montebello Unified School Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/24 (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
577,710 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/24 (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
569,490 |
|
|
2,830 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/25 (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
996,641 |
|
|
2,775 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/27 (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
842,407 |
|
|
4,700 |
|
Moreno Valley Unified School Dist. Community Facs. Dist., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Tax, 5.20%, 9/1/36 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,206,387 |
|
|
2,400 |
|
Morgan Hill Unified School Dist., GO, zero coupon, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/1/23 (FGIC) |
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
1,124,256 |
|
|
3,245 |
|
Newark Unified School Dist., GO, zero coupon, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/1/26, Ser. D (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
1,109,498 |
|
|
19,805 |
|
Oakland, GO, 5.00%, 1/15/27, Ser. A (MBIA-FGIC)(h) |
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
17,954,619 |
|
|
|
|
Palmdale Community Redev. Agcy., Tax Allocation (AMBAC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
zero coupon, 12/1/30 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
298,041 |
|
|
1,230 |
|
zero coupon, 12/1/31 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
280,686 |
|
|
1,225 |
|
zero coupon, 12/1/32 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
260,325 |
|
|
1,750 |
|
Paramount Unified School Dist., GO, zero coupon, 9/1/23, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ser. B (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
744,642 |
|
|
|
|
Perris Public Financing Auth. Rev., Tax Allocation, Ser. C, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
780 |
|
5.375%, 10/1/20 |
|
NR/A |
|
|
763,581 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
5.625%, 10/1/31 |
|
NR/A |
|
|
1,678,464 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School Dist., CP, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/1/32 (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
A2/AA |
|
|
8,513,300 |
|
|
10,150 |
|
Placer Union High School Dist., GO, zero coupon, 8/1/33 (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
2,126,222 |
|
|
|
|
Poway Unified School Dist., Special Tax, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Facs. Dist. No. 6, Area A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
5.125%, 9/1/28 |
|
NR/BBB |
|
|
1,967,328 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
5.60%, 9/1/33 |
|
NR/BBB |
|
|
2,354,160 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
6.05%, 9/1/25 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
803,110 |
|
|
5,500 |
|
6.125%, 9/1/33 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
4,286,590 |
|
16 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
||
$ |
1,000 |
|
Community Facs. Dist. No. 10, 5.65%, 9/1/25 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
$ 781,250 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Rancho Cucamonga Community Facs. Dist., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Tax, 6.375%, 9/1/31, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,636,660 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Richmond Wastewater Rev., zero coupon, 8/1/30 (FGIC) |
|
Baa3/AA- |
|
|
425,685 |
|
|
3,510 |
|
Riverside, CP, 5.00%, 9/1/33 (AMBAC) |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
3,024,778 |
|
|
|
|
Riverside Unified School Dist. Community Facs. Dist. No. 15, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Tax, Ser. A, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
5.15%, 9/1/25 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
752,950 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
5.25%, 9/1/30 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
710,770 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
5.25%, 9/1/35 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
690,910 |
|
|
|
|
Rocklin Unified School Dist., GO (FGIC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/24 (MBIA) |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
1,960,000 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/25 (MBIA) |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
1,458,000 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/26 |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
1,355,960 |
|
|
4,500 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/27 (MBIA) |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
1,419,345 |
|
|
|
|
Roseville Redev. Agcy., Tax Allocation (MBIA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,730 |
|
5.00%, 9/1/27, Ser. B |
|
A3/AA |
|
|
3,381,916 |
|
|
3,365 |
|
5.00%, 9/1/32 |
|
A3/AA |
|
|
2,862,269 |
|
|
2,030 |
|
5.00%, 9/1/33 |
|
A3/AA |
|
|
1,716,020 |
|
|
4,335 |
|
Sacramento City Financing Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Natomas CFD No. 2, 6.25%, 9/1/23, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
3,633,597 |
|
|
|
|
San Diego Cnty. Water Auth., CP, Ser. A (MBIA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,285 |
|
5.00%, 5/1/28 |
|
Aa3/AA+ |
|
|
7,527,834 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
5.00%, 5/1/29 |
|
Aa3/AA+ |
|
|
7,214,080 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
San Diego Community Facs. Dist. No. 3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Tax, 5.60%, 9/1/21, Ser. A (a) |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,045,980 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
San Diego Public Facs. Financing Auth. Lease Rev. (MBIA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 5/15/29, Ser. A (FGIC) |
|
A3/A+ |
|
|
864,040 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Fire & Life Safety Facs., 5.00%, 4/1/32 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
1,170,390 |
|
|
11,000 |
|
Water Rev., 5.00%, 8/1/32 |
|
A3/AA |
|
|
9,212,830 |
|
|
5,585 |
|
San Francisco City & Cnty. Airports Commission Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50%, 5/1/28, Ser. 2 (MBIA) |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
4,485,314 |
|
|
10,405 |
|
San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agcy. Toll Road Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zero coupon, 1/1/25 |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
4,348,978 |
|
|
|
|
San Jose, Libraries & Parks, GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,970 |
|
5.00%, 9/1/32, Ser. 760 (MBIA)(h) |
|
Aa1/AAA |
|
|
14,058,477 |
|
|
10,190 |
|
5.125%, 9/1/31 |
|
Aa1/AAA |
|
|
9,785,966 |
|
|
9,150 |
|
San Jose Unified School Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Clara Cnty., 5.00%, 8/1/27, Ser. A (FSA)(h) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
8,508,036 |
|
|
|
|
San Juan Unified School Dist., GO (FSA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/23 |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
751,418 |
|
|
6,105 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/26 |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
2,087,361 |
|
|
2,300 |
|
San Mateo Union High School Dist., GO, zero coupon, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/20 (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
1,234,364 |
|
|
1,730 |
|
San Rafael City High School Dist., GO, 5.00%, 8/1/27, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ser. B (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
1,662,893 |
|
|
3,280 |
|
San Rafael Elementary School Dist., GO, 5.00%, 8/1/27, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ser. B (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
3,134,106 |
|
|
|
|
Santa Clara Unified School Dist., GO (MBIA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
5.00%, 7/1/25 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
2,010,076 |
|
|
3,040 |
|
5.00%, 7/1/27 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
2,776,371 |
|
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 17
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
||
$ |
1,260 |
|
Santa Cruz Cnty., CP, 5.25%, 8/1/32 |
|
A3/NR |
|
|
$ 1,200,881 |
|
|
|
|
Santa Margarita Water Dist., Special Tax, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
6.00%, 9/1/30, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 9/1/13) (c) |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,274,760 |
|
|
815 |
|
6.25%, 9/1/29, (Pre-refunded @ $102, 9/1/09) (c) |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
860,917 |
|
|
2,185 |
|
6.25%, 9/1/29 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,803,084 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Santa Monica Community College Dist., GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zero coupon, 8/1/26, Ser. C (MBIA) |
|
Aa2/AA |
|
|
660,900 |
|
|
|
|
Saugus Hart School Facs. Financing Auth. Community Facs. Dist., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Tax, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
6.10%, 9/1/32 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
892,791 |
|
|
2,155 |
|
6.125%, 9/1/33 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,679,564 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Shasta Union High School Dist., GO, zero coupon, 8/1/24 (FGIC) |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
392,000 |
|
|
2,745 |
|
South Tahoe JT Powers Parking Financing Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.00%, 12/1/27, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,124,822 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
Southern Mono Health Care Dist., GO, zero coupon, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/1/26 (MBIA) |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
584,622 |
|
|
|
|
State, GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
5.00%, 6/1/37 |
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
333,448 |
|
|
14,400 |
|
5.00%, 11/1/37, Ser. 2670 (h) |
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
11,994,336 |
|
|
2,400 |
|
5.00%, 12/1/37 |
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
1,998,936 |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Community Dev. Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
Baptist Univ., 5.50%, 11/1/38, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
968,128 |
|
|
3,495 |
|
Bentley School, 6.75%, 7/1/32 (a)(b) |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,805,646 |
|
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
5.50%, 7/1/31, Ser. D |
|
A2/A |
|
|
1,517,490 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
5.50%, 7/1/31, Ser. E |
|
A2/A |
|
|
1,517,472 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
Huntington Park Chapter School, 5.25%, 7/1/42, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
804,025 |
|
|
9,700 |
|
Jewish Home, 5.50%, 11/15/33 (CA St. Mtg.) |
|
NR/A+ |
|
|
8,196,112 |
|
|
2,770 |
|
Kaiser Permanente, 5.50%, 11/1/32, Ser. A |
|
NR/A+ |
|
|
2,287,134 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
Live Oak School, 6.75%, 10/1/30 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
2,474,610 |
|
|
500 |
|
Peninsula Project, 5.00%, 11/1/29 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
330,190 |
|
|
1,170 |
|
Wildwood Elementary School, CP, 6.10%, 11/1/15 (a)(b) |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,160,839 |
|
|
1,365 |
|
Windrush School, 5.50%, 7/1/37 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
907,889 |
|
|
|
|
Statewide Financing Auth. Tobacco Settlement Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
5.625%, 5/1/29 |
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
1,253,466 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
6.00%, 5/1/37, Ser. B |
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
13,862,400 |
|
|
|
|
Tobacco Securitization Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
Alameda Cnty., 6.00%, 6/1/42 |
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
3,036,960 |
|
|
|
|
Fresno Cnty., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
5.625%, 6/1/23 |
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
3,390,956 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
6.00%, 6/1/35 |
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
7,086,100 |
|
|
6,600 |
|
Gold Cnty., zero coupon, 6/1/33 |
|
NR/BBB |
|
|
626,274 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
Stanislaus Funding, 5.875%, 6/1/43, Ser. A |
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
1,188,756 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
Tobacco Securitization Auth. of Southern California Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/37, Ser. A-1 |
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
4,701,600 |
|
|
995 |
|
Tracy Community Facs. Dist., Special Tax, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Macarthur Area, 6.00%, 9/1/27 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
801,542 |
|
18 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
Univ. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,500 |
|
4.75%, 5/15/35, Ser. F (FSA)(h) |
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
$ 4,630,835 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
4.75%, 5/15/35, Ser. G (FGIC)(h) |
|
Aa1/AA |
|
|
4,117,200 |
|
|
5,650 |
|
4.75%, 5/15/38, Ser. B |
|
Aa2/AA- |
|
|
4,638,876 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
Ventura Cnty. Community College Dist. GO, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/1/27, Ser. A (MBIA) (h) |
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
9,498,800 |
|
|
1,555 |
|
Ventura Unified School Dist., GO, 5.00%, 8/1/32, Ser. F (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
1,431,455 |
|
|
|
|
Victor Elementary School Dist., GO, Ser. A (MBIA-FGIC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/24 |
|
A2/AA |
|
|
431,066 |
|
|
2,410 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/26 |
|
A2/AA |
|
|
796,240 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Vista Unified School Dist., GO, zero coupon, 8/1/26, Ser. A (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
344,850 |
|
|
|
|
West Contra Costa Unified School Dist., GO, Ser. A (MBIA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,740 |
|
5.00%, 8/1/26 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
2,512,772 |
|
|
2,690 |
|
5.00%, 8/1/28 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
2,313,319 |
|
|
1,890 |
|
5.00%, 8/1/31 |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
1,587,146 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
William S. Hart JT School Financing Auth. Rev., 5.625%, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/34 |
|
NR/BBB+ |
|
|
1,568,740 |
|
|
2,110 |
|
Yuba City Unified School Dist., GO, zero coupon, 9/1/25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MBIA-FGIC) |
|
A3/AA |
|
|
777,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total California Municipal Bonds & Notes (cost$665,086,980) |
|
|
|
|
580,869,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER MUNICIPAL BONDS & NOTES3.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Iowa1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,100 |
|
Tobacco Settlement Auth. of Iowa Rev., 5.60%, 6/1/34, Ser. B |
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
11,284,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
New York0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Auth. Rev. Ser. D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/15/37, Ser. 3240 (h) |
|
Aa2/AAA |
|
|
1,720,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Pennsylvania0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
Allegheny Cnty. Hospital Dev. Auth. Rev., 5.375%, 11/15/40, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ser. A |
|
Ba3/BB |
|
|
2,424,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Puerto Rico1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. Rev., 6.00%, 7/1/38, Ser. A |
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
1,927,750 |
|
|
2,505 |
|
Public Building Auth. Rev., Govt Facs., 5.00%, 7/1/36, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ser. I (GTD) |
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
1,955,077 |
|
|
|
|
Sales Tax Financing Corp. Rev., Ser. A (AMBAC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,600 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/47 |
|
A1/AA |
|
|
2,100,418 |
|
|
12,500 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/54 |
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
418,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,401,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Municipal Bonds & Notes (cost$31,929,020) |
|
|
|
|
21,830,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 19
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
||
OTHER VARIABLE RATE NOTES (f)0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Puerto Rico0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,300 |
|
Public Finance Corp. Rev., 5.75%, 8/1/27, Ser. A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cost$5,496,535) |
|
Ba1/BBB- |
|
|
$ 5,275,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. TREASURY BILLS (g)5.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
36,470 |
|
0.01%-1.10%, 12/11/08-2/26/09 (cost$36,465,321) |
|
|
|
|
36,465,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (cost$738,977,856)100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ 644,440,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
||
NEW YORK MUNICIPAL BONDS & NOTES87.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
$ |
250 |
|
Buffalo Municipal Water Finance Auth., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water System Rev., 5.00%, 7/1/27, Ser. B, (Pre-refunded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ $100, 7/1/12) (FSA)(c) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
$ 274,315 |
|
|
2,400 |
|
Erie Cnty. Industrial Dev. Agcy., Orchard Park Rev., 6.00%, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/15/36 |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,601,760 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
Erie Cnty. Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.50%, 7/15/32, (Pre-refunded @ $101, 7/15/10) (c) |
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
10,837,400 |
|
|
1,700 |
|
Liberty Dev. Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 10/1/37 |
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
1,256,011 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
Goldman Sachs Headquarters, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 10/1/35, Ser. 1251 (h) |
|
Aa3/AA- |
|
|
1,789,000 |
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Transportation Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
5.00%, 11/15/30, Ser. A (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
1,573,036 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
5.25%, 11/15/31, Ser. E |
|
A2/A |
|
|
8,719,700 |
|
|
7,000 |
|
5.35%, 7/1/31, Ser. B |
|
A1/AAA |
|
|
6,273,330 |
|
|
3,570 |
|
Mortgage Agcy. Rev., 4.75%, 10/1/27, Ser. 128 |
|
Aa1/NR |
|
|
2,903,481 |
|
|
2,400 |
|
Nassau Cnty. Industrial Dev. Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amsterdam at Harborside, 6.70%, 1/1/43, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,816,968 |
|
|
|
|
New York City Health & Hospital Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
5.375%, 2/15/26, Ser. A |
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
994,433 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
5.45%, 2/15/26, Ser. A |
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
1,823,680 |
|
|
|
|
New York City Industrial Dev. Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
975 |
|
Eger Harbor, 4.95%, 11/20/32, (GNMA) |
|
NR/AA+ |
|
|
812,565 |
|
|
1,415 |
|
Liberty Interactive Corp., 5.00%, 9/1/35 |
|
Ba2/BB+ |
|
|
945,914 |
|
|
1,205 |
|
Staten Island Univ. Hospital, 6.45%, 7/1/32 |
|
B2/NR |
|
|
887,892 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
United Jewish Appeal Fed., 5.00%, 7/1/27 |
|
Aa1/NR |
|
|
1,450,605 |
|
|
|
|
Yankee Stadium, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
5.00%, 3/1/31, (FGIC) |
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
3,922,500 |
|
|
2,400 |
|
5.00%, 3/1/36, (MBIA) |
|
Baa1/AA |
|
|
1,820,304 |
|
|
|
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Auth., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water & Sewer System Rev. (h), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
4.50%, 6/15/33, Ser. C |
|
Aa2/AA+ |
|
|
6,091,050 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
5.00%, 6/15/32, Ser. A |
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
14,047,950 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
New York City Transitional Finance Auth. Rev., 5.00%, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/1/27, Ser. B |
|
Aa1/AAA |
|
|
9,609,300 |
|
|
7,785 |
|
New York City Trust for Cultural Res. Rev., 5.00%, 2/1/34, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MBIA-FGIC) |
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
6,993,421 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
New York City, GO, 5.00%, 3/1/33, Ser. I |
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
3,458,600 |
|
|
3,600 |
|
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 4/15/32, Ser. 125 (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
3,382,596 |
|
|
|
|
State Dormitory Auth. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
5.25%, 9/1/28, (Pre-refunded @ $102, 9/1/09) (Radian)(c) |
|
A3/AA |
|
|
84,103 |
|
|
1,320 |
|
5.25%, 9/1/28, (Radian) |
|
A3/AA |
|
|
1,213,885 |
|
|
7,490 |
|
5.50%, 5/15/31, Ser. A (AMBAC) |
|
Aa3/AA |
|
|
7,319,902 |
|
|
2,600 |
|
Catholic Health of Long Island, 5.10%, 7/1/34 |
|
Baa1/BBB |
|
|
1,813,942 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Kaleida Health Hospital, 5.05%, 2/15/25, (FHA) |
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
1,776,540 |
|
|
5,300 |
|
Lenox Hill Hospital, 5.50%, 7/1/30 |
|
Ba1/NR |
|
|
3,521,161 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
New York Univ. Hospital, 5.625%, 7/1/37, Ser. B |
|
Ba2/BB |
|
|
697,810 |
|
|
5,850 |
|
North General Hospital, 5.00%, 2/15/25 |
|
NR/AA- |
|
|
5,411,952 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Rochester General Hospital, 5.00%, 12/1/35, (Radian) |
|
A3/BBB+ |
|
|
3,805,850 |
|
|
4,270 |
|
Teachers College, 5.00%, 7/1/32, (MBIA) |
|
A1/NR |
|
|
4,011,067 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Yeshiva Univ., 5.125%, 7/1/34, (AMBAC) |
|
Aa2/NR |
|
|
1,889,720 |
|
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 21
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Principal |
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Value |
|
||
$ |
2,000 |
|
State Environmental Facs. Corp., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Clean Water & Drinking Rev., 5.125%, 6/15/31 |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
$ 1,923,720 |
|
|
|
|
Tobacco Settlement Asset Backed, Inc. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
5.00%, 6/1/34, Ser. 1 |
|
NR/BBB |
|
|
17,592,250 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
5.75%, 7/15/32, Ser. 1, (Pre-refunded @ $100, 7/15/12) (c) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
28,013,000 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
6.375%, 7/15/39, Ser. 1, (Pre-refunded @ $101, 7/15/09) (c) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
10,428,900 |
|
|
710 |
|
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth. Rev., 5.00%, 1/1/32, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(FGIC-TCRS) |
|
Aa2/AA- |
|
|
644,524 |
|
|
1,815 |
|
Ulster Cnty. Industrial Dev. Agcy. Rev., 6.00%, 9/15/37, Ser. A |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
1,257,704 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Warren & Washington Cntys. Industrial Dev. Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glens Falls Hospital, 5.00%, 12/1/35, Ser. A (FSA) |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
1,772,740 |
|
|
750 |
|
Westchester Cnty. Industrial Dev. Agcy. Continuing Care |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Rev., Kendal on Hudson, 6.50%, 1/1/34, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Pre-refunded @ $100, 1/1/13) (c) |
|
NR/NR |
|
|
863,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Total New York Municipal Bonds & Notes (cost$206,139,420) |
|
|
|
|
187,327,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER MUNICIPAL BONDS & NOTES7.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
California3.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda Unified School Dist., GO, Alameda Cnty.(FSA), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/24, Ser. A |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
1,365,210 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/25, Ser. A |
|
Aaa/AAA |
|
|
1,089,540 |
|
|
3,130 |
|
Covina Valley Unified School Dist., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GO, zero coupon, 6/1/25, Ser. B (MBIA-FGIC) |
|
NR/AA |
|
|
1,143,295 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Tobacco Securitization Agcy. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles Cnty., zero coupon, 6/1/28 |
|
Baa3/NR |
|
|
3,258,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,856,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Puerto Rico4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. Rev., 6.00%, 7/1/38, Ser. A |
|
Baa3/BBB- |
|
|
4,030,750 |
|
|
5,675 |
|
Childrens Trust Fund Tobacco Settlement Rev., 5.625%, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/15/43 |
|
Baa3/BBB |
|
|
3,947,587 |
|
|
|
|
Sales Tax Financing Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,250 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/54, Ser. A (AMBAC) |
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
476,947 |
|
|
12,900 |
|
zero coupon, 8/1/56, Ser. A |
|
A1/A+ |
|
|
355,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,810,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Total Other Municipal Bonds & Notes (cost$21,112,875) |
|
|
|
|
15,667,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW YORK VARIABLE RATE NOTES (a)(d)(f)0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
1,300 |
|
State Urban Dev. Corp. Rev., 19.167%, 3/15/35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cost$1,405,204) |
|
NR/AAA |
|
|
682,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER VARIABLE RATE NOTES (f)1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
California0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. Rev., |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/1/35, Ser. A (FGIC) (a)(d) |
|
A2/A |
|
|
1,069,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Puerto Rico0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
Public Finance Corp. Rev., 5.75%, 8/1/27, Ser. A |
|
Ba1/BBB- |
|
|
1,891,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Total Other Variable Rate Notes (cost$3,970,456) |
|
|
|
|
2,960,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. TREASURY BILLS (g)3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
8,140 |
|
0.12%-1.10%,12/26/08-2/26/09 (cost$8,138,717) |
|
|
|
|
8,138,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (cost$240,766,672)100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ 214,777,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Schedule of Investments |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
||
Notes to Schedules of Investments: |
|
|
(a) |
Private PlacementRestricted as to resale and may not have a readily available market. Securities with an aggregate value of $21,194,686, representing 1.81% of total investments in Municipal Income II. Securities with an aggregate value of $5,012,465, representing 0.78% of total investments in California Municipal Income II. Securities with an aggregate value of $1,752,520, representing 0.82% of total investments in New York Municipal II. |
|
(b) |
Illiquid security. |
|
(c) |
Pre-refunded bonds are collateralized by U.S. Government or other eligible securities which are held in escrow and used to pay principal and interest and retire the bonds at the earliest refunding date (payment date) and/or whose interest rates vary with changes in a designated base rate (such as the prime interest rate). |
|
(d) |
144A SecuritySecurity exempt from registration, under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, typically only to qualified institutional buyers. Unless otherwise indicated, these securities are not considered to be illiquid. |
|
(e) |
Inverse FloaterThe interest rate shown bears an inverse relationship to the interest rate on another security or the value of an index. The interest rate disclosed reflects the rate in effect on November 30, 2008. |
|
(f) |
Variable Rate NotesInstruments whose interest rates change on specified date (such as a coupon date or interest payment date) and/or whose interest rates vary with changes in a designated base rate (such as the prime interest rate). The interest rate disclosed reflects the rate in effect on November 30, 2008. |
|
(g) |
All or partial amount segregated as collateral for swaps. |
|
(h) |
Residual Interest Bonds Held in TrustSecurities represent underlying bonds transferred to a separate securitization trust established in a tender option bond transaction in which the Funds acquired the residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. |
|
|
||
|
Glossary: |
AMBAC insured by American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. |
CA Mtg. Ins. insured by California Mortgage Insurance |
CA St. Mtg. insured by California State Mortgage |
CP Certificates of Participation |
FGIC insured by Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
FHA insured by Federal Housing Administration |
FSA insured by Financial Security Assurance, Inc. |
GNMA insured by Government National Mortgage Association |
GO General Obligation Bond |
GTD Guaranteed |
IBC Insurance Bond Certificate |
MBIA insured by Municipal Bond Investors Assurance |
NR Not Rated |
PSF Public School Fund |
Radian insured by Radian Guaranty, Inc. |
TCRS Temporary Custodian Receipts |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements | 11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 23
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Statements of Assets and Liabilities |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II |
|
California |
|
New York |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments, at value (cost$1,329,455,621, $738,977,856 and $240,766,672, respectively) |
|
|
$ 1,168,910,596 |
|
|
|
$ 644,440,954 |
|
|
|
$ 214,777,161 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,866,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Premium for swaps purchased |
|
|
39,583,727 |
|
|
|
21,398,729 |
|
|
|
6,520,624 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Interest receivable |
|
|
20,852,855 |
|
|
|
17,531,414 |
|
|
|
4,374,927 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Receivable for investments sold |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
51,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
52,401 |
|
|
|
401,469 |
|
|
|
358,396 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total Assets |
|
|
1,229,469,579 |
|
|
|
690,690,793 |
|
|
|
226,031,108 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized depreciation on swaps |
|
|
89,128,259 |
|
|
|
49,067,968 |
|
|
|
14,172,628 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Payable for floating rate notes |
|
|
81,697,152 |
|
|
|
110,420,820 |
|
|
|
13,552,563 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Premium for swaps sold |
|
|
48,000,000 |
|
|
|
26,000,000 |
|
|
|
8,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Payable to custodian for cash overdraft |
|
|
4,623,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,951,192 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Dividends payable to common and preferred shareholders |
|
|
3,960,485 |
|
|
|
2,211,247 |
|
|
|
724,919 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Interest payable |
|
|
3,403,811 |
|
|
|
8,708,932 |
|
|
|
480,619 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Investment management fees payable |
|
|
527,146 |
|
|
|
261,990 |
|
|
|
97,542 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other payables |
|
|
727,013 |
|
|
|
5,382,142 |
|
|
|
115,969 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
|
|
232,067,849 |
|
|
|
202,053,099 |
|
|
|
41,095,432 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Preferred shares ($0.00001 par value and $25,000 net asset and liquidation value per share applicable to an aggregate of 20,200, 10,400 and 3,600 shares issued and outstanding, respectively) |
|
|
505,000,000 |
|
|
|
260,000,000 |
|
|
|
90,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
$ 492,401,730 |
|
|
|
$ 228,637,694 |
|
|
|
$ 94,935,676 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par value ($0.00001 per share) |
|
|
$ 593 |
|
|
|
$ 308 |
|
|
|
$ 106 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Paid-in-capital in excess of par |
|
|
843,249,612 |
|
|
|
436,051,623 |
|
|
|
151,085,082 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Undistributed (dividends in excess of) net investment income |
|
|
2,499,400 |
|
|
|
(4,204,630 |
) |
|
|
(1,091,114 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
Accumulated net realized loss |
|
|
(103,674,286 |
) |
|
|
(65,242,666 |
) |
|
|
(14,635,408 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net unrealized depreciation of investments and swaps |
|
|
(249,673,589 |
) |
|
|
(137,966,941 |
) |
|
|
(40,422,990 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
$ 492,401,730 |
|
|
|
$ 228,637,694 |
|
|
|
$ 94,935,676 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
59,311,427 |
|
|
|
30,815,157 |
|
|
|
10,648,543 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net Asset Value Per Common Share |
|
|
$ 8.30 |
|
|
|
$ 7.42 |
|
|
|
$ 8.92 |
|
|
|
|
24 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08 | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Statements of Operations |
For the six months ended November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II |
|
California |
|
New York |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Investment Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
$ 39,684,097 |
|
|
|
$ 21,391,691 |
|
|
|
$ 6,530,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment management fees |
|
|
3,963,395 |
|
|
|
1,987,390 |
|
|
|
714,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Interest expense |
|
|
2,453,651 |
|
|
|
3,355,022 |
|
|
|
254,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Auction agent fees and commissions |
|
|
646,615 |
|
|
|
334,930 |
|
|
|
123,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Custodian and accounting agent fees |
|
|
80,565 |
|
|
|
52,743 |
|
|
|
18,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Legal fees |
|
|
75,983 |
|
|
|
50,883 |
|
|
|
31,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Shareholder communications |
|
|
74,790 |
|
|
|
40,644 |
|
|
|
4,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Trustees fees and expenses |
|
|
62,903 |
|
|
|
35,785 |
|
|
|
20,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Audit and tax services |
|
|
45,483 |
|
|
|
28,929 |
|
|
|
13,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
New York Stock Exchange listing fees |
|
|
28,618 |
|
|
|
14,975 |
|
|
|
12,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Transfer agent fees |
|
|
18,168 |
|
|
|
12,087 |
|
|
|
18,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Insurance expense |
|
|
4,237 |
|
|
|
2,336 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Miscellaneous |
|
|
6,745 |
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total expenses |
|
|
7,461,153 |
|
|
|
5,922,081 |
|
|
|
1,216,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Less: investment management fees waived |
|
|
(358,646 |
) |
|
|
(180,053 |
) |
|
|
(64,541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
custody credits earned on cash balances |
|
|
(40,932 |
) |
|
|
(10,890 |
) |
|
|
(10,482 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net expenses |
|
|
7,061,575 |
|
|
|
5,731,138 |
|
|
|
1,141,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
32,622,522 |
|
|
|
15,660,553 |
|
|
|
5,388,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Change In Unrealized Gain (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
(6,073,222 |
) |
|
|
(6,428,795 |
) |
|
|
512,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Futures contracts |
|
|
(7,068,860 |
) |
|
|
(2,876,409 |
) |
|
|
(960,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Swaps |
|
|
(12,370,154 |
) |
|
|
(6,700,500 |
) |
|
|
(2,061,692 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
(208,559,433 |
) |
|
|
(110,713,622 |
) |
|
|
(32,249,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Futures contracts |
|
|
(6,565,336 |
) |
|
|
(4,502,969 |
) |
|
|
(1,197,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Swaps |
|
|
(89,128,259 |
) |
|
|
(49,067,968 |
) |
|
|
(14,172,628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net realized and change in unrealized (loss) on investments, futures contracts and swaps |
|
|
(329,765,264 |
) |
|
|
(180,290,263 |
) |
|
|
(50,128,568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Investment Operations |
|
|
(297,142,742 |
) |
|
|
(164,629,710 |
) |
|
|
(44,739,906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Dividends on Preferred Shares from Net Investment Income |
|
|
(9,169,316 |
) |
|
|
(4,720,836 |
) |
|
|
(1,631,548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Net Decrease in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders Resulting from Investment Operations |
|
|
$ (306,312,058 |
) |
|
|
$ (169,350,546 |
) |
|
|
$ (46,371,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements | 11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 25
|
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets |
|
|
Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Municipal II |
|
|||||
|
|
Six months |
|
Year ended |
|
|||
|
|
|
||||||
Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
$ 32,622,522 |
|
|
|
$ 66,423,523 |
|
|
|
|||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts and swaps |
|
|
(25,512,236 |
) |
|
|
5,404,191 |
|
|
|
|||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments, futures contracts and swaps |
|
|
(304,253,028 |
) |
|
|
(78,458,658 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
Net decrease in net assets resulting from investment operations |
|
|
(297,142,742 |
) |
|
|
(6,630,944 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Preferred Shareholders from Net investment income |
|
|
(9,169,316 |
) |
|
|
(17,559,291 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
Net decrease in net assets applicable to common shareholders resulting from investment operations |
|
|
(306,312,058 |
) |
|
|
(24,190,235 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders from Net Investment Income |
|
|
(23,109,268 |
) |
|
|
(46,046,478 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of dividends |
|
|
2,083,433 |
|
|
|
3,161,576 |
|
|
|
|||||||
Total decrease in net assets applicable to common shareholders |
|
|
(327,337,893 |
) |
|
|
(67,075,137 |
) |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
819,739,623 |
|
|
|
886,814,760 |
|
|
|
|||||||
End of period (including undistributed (dividends in excess of) net investment income of $2,499,400 and $2,155,462; $(4,204,630) and $(2,219,623); $(1,091,114) and $(621,423); respectively) |
|
|
$ 492,401,730 |
|
|
|
$ 819,739,623 |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares Issued in Reinvestment of Dividends |
|
|
162,941 |
|
|
|
223,853 |
|
|
|
26 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08 | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Municipal II |
|
New York Municipal II |
|
|||||||||||
Six months |
|
Year ended |
|
Six months |
|
Year ended |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 15,660,553 |
|
|
|
$ 32,439,150 |
|
|
|
$ 5,388,662 |
|
|
|
$ 11,390,311 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
(16,005,704 |
) |
|
|
(9,422,890 |
) |
|
|
(2,508,958 |
) |
|
|
436,283 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164,284,559 |
) |
|
|
(36,237,871 |
) |
|
|
(47,619,610 |
) |
|
|
(12,133,193 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
(164,629,710 |
) |
|
|
(13,221,611 |
) |
|
|
(44,739,906 |
) |
|
|
(306,599 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,720,836 |
) |
|
|
(8,660,050 |
) |
|
|
(1,631,548 |
) |
|
|
(3,073,529 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
(169,350,546 |
) |
|
|
(21,881,661 |
) |
|
|
(46,371,454 |
) |
|
|
(3,380,128 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,924,724 |
) |
|
|
(25,748,032 |
) |
|
|
(4,226,805 |
) |
|
|
(8,420,559 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,143,615 |
|
|
|
2,114,952 |
|
|
|
433,791 |
|
|
|
682,941 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
(181,131,655 |
) |
|
|
(45,514,741 |
) |
|
|
(50,164,468 |
) |
|
|
(11,117,746 |
) |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,769,349 |
|
|
|
455,284,090 |
|
|
|
145,100,144 |
|
|
|
156,217,890 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
$ 228,637,694 |
|
|
|
$ 409,769,349 |
|
|
|
$ 94,935,676 |
|
|
|
$ 145,100,144 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,230 |
|
|
|
150,398 |
|
|
|
34,653 |
|
|
|
48,516 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements | 11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 27
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Statement of Cash Flows |
For the six months ended November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash Flows provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of long-term investments |
|
|
$ (2,388,320 |
) |
|
||||
Proceeds from sales of long-term investments |
|
|
161,306,879 |
|
|
||||
Decrease in deposits with brokers for futures contracts collateral |
|
|
5,940,000 |
|
|
||||
Interest received |
|
|
17,063,672 |
|
|
||||
Net cash used for swap transactions |
|
|
(2,099,229 |
) |
|
||||
Operating expenses paid |
|
|
(2,448,567 |
) |
|
||||
Net cash used for futures transactions |
|
|
(8,364,011 |
) |
|
||||
Net increase in short-term investments |
|
|
(39,749,758 |
) |
|
||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
129,260,666 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid (excluding reinvestment of $1,143,615) |
|
|
(16,510,322 |
) |
|
||||
Payments to retire floating rate notes |
|
|
(109,809,660 |
) |
|
||||
Cash paid on issuance of floating rate notes |
|
|
(6,507,353 |
) |
|
||||
Net cash used for financing activities* |
|
|
(132,827,335 |
) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash |
|
|
(3,566,669 |
) |
|
||||
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
10,433,522 |
|
|
||||
Cash at end of period |
|
|
6,866,853 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Investment Operations to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets resulting from investment operations |
|
|
(164,629,710 |
) |
|
||||
Decrease in deposits with brokers for futures contracts collateral |
|
|
5,940,000 |
|
|
||||
Decrease in interest receivable |
|
|
1,178,980 |
|
|
||||
Decrease in receivable for investments sold |
|
|
1,099,078 |
|
|
||||
Increase in premium for swaps purchased |
|
|
(21,398,729 |
) |
|
||||
Increase in premium for swaps sold |
|
|
26,000,000 |
|
|
||||
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(10,336 |
) |
|
||||
Decrease in investment management fees payable |
|
|
(49,147 |
) |
|
||||
Increase in net unrealized depreciation on swaps |
|
|
49,067,968 |
|
|
||||
Decrease in net payable for variation margin on futures contracts |
|
|
(984,634 |
) |
|
||||
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(12,968 |
) |
|
||||
Net decrease in investments |
|
|
233,060,164 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
$ 129,260,666 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Supplemental Disclosure |
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activity not included consists of interest expense on floating rate notes issued of $3,355,022. |
28 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08 | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
Under normal market conditions, Municipal II invests substantially all of its assets in a portfolio of municipal bonds, the interest from which is exempt from federal income taxes. Under normal market conditions, California Municipal II invests substantially all of its assets in municipal bonds which pay interest that is currently exempt from federal and California state income taxes. Under normal market conditions, New York Municipal II invests substantially all of its assets in municipal bonds which pay interest that is currently exempt from federal, New York State and New York City income taxes. The Funds will seek to avoid investing in bonds generating interest income which could potentially subject individuals to alternative minimum tax. The issuers abilities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic and political developments in a specific state or region.
The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
In the normal course of business the Funds enter into contracts that contain a variety of representations which provide general indemnifications. The Funds maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds that have not yet occured. However, the Funds expect the risk of any loss to be remote.
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (the Interpretation). The Interpretation establishes for all entities, including pass-through entities such as the Funds, a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of positions taken in filing tax returns (including whether an entity is taxable in a particular jurisdiction), and requires certain expanded tax disclosures. The Funds management has determined that its evaluation of the Interpretation has resulted in no material impact to the Funds financial statements at November 30, 2008. The Funds federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
In March 2008, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about a funds derivative and hedging activities.
In September 2008, FASB issued a FASB Staff Position No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4 Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161 (FSP). FSP requires enhanced transparency of the effect of credit derivatives and guarantees on an issuers financial position, financial performance and cash flows. FSP is effective for fiscal years or interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. This FSP applies to certain credit derivatives, hybrid instruments that have embedded credit derivatives (for example, credit-linked notes), and certain guarantees and it requires additional disclosures regarding credit derivatives with sold protection. The Funds have determined that the FSP has no impact to the financial statements at November 30, 2008.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Funds:
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 29
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
|
|
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
|
|
Level 2 other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
|
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The valuation techniques used by the Funds to measure fair value during the six months ended November 30, 2008 maximized the use of observable inputs and minimized the use of unobservable inputs.
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of November 30, 2008 in valuing the Funds investments carried at value:
Municipal Income II:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Investments in |
|
Other Financial |
|
||
Level 1 Quoted Prices |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Level 2 Other Significant Observable Inputs |
|
|
1,168,910,596 |
|
|
(89,128,259 |
) |
Level 3 Significant Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,168,910,596 |
|
$ |
(89,128,259 |
) |
|
|
30 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Investments in |
|
Other Financial |
|
||
Level 1 Quoted Prices |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Level 2 Other Significant Observable Inputs |
|
|
644,440,954 |
|
|
(49,067,968 |
) |
Level 3 Significant Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
644,440,954 |
|
$ |
(49,067,968 |
) |
|
|
New York Municipal II:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Investments in |
|
Other Financial |
|
||
Level 1 Quoted Prices |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Level 2 Other Significant Observable Inputs |
|
|
214,777,161 |
|
|
(14,172,628 |
) |
Level 3 Significant Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
214,777,161 |
|
$ |
(14,172,628 |
) |
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements involve the exchange by the Funds with a counterparty of their respective commitments to pay or receive interest, e.g., an exchange of floating rate payments for fixed rate payments with respect to a notional amount of principal. Net periodic payments received (paid) by the Funds are included as part of realized gain (loss) and net periodic payments accrued, but not yet received (paid) are included in change in the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the Statements of Operations.
Swaps are marked to market daily based upon quotations from brokers or market makers and the change in value, if any, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation in the Funds Statements of Operations.
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 31
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
The Funds may also invest in Inverse Floaters without transferring a fixed rate municipal bond into a special purpose trust, which are not accounted for as secured borrowings.
The Inverse Floaters are created by dividing the income stream provided by the underlying bonds to create two securities, one short-term and one long-term. The interest rate on the short-term component is reset by an index or auction process typically every 7 to 35 days. After income is paid on the short-term securities at current rates, the residual income from the underlying bond(s) goes to the long-term securities. Therefore, rising short-term rates result in lower income for the long-term component and vice versa. The longer-term bonds may be more volatile and less liquid than other municipal bonds of comparable maturity. Investments in Inverse Floaters typically will involve greater risk than in an investment in Fixed Rate Bonds. The Funds may also invest in Inverse Floaters for the purpose of increasing leverage.
The Funds restrictions on borrowings do not apply to the secured borrowings deemed to have occurred for accounting purposes pursuant to FASB Statement No. 140. Inverse Floaters held by the Funds are exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.
32 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
The Investment Manager has retained its affiliate, Pacific Investment Management Company LLC (the Sub-Adviser), to manage each Funds investments. Subject to the supervision of the Investment Manager, the Sub-Adviser is responsible for making all investment decisions for the Funds. The Investment Manager, not the Funds, pays a portion of the fees it receives to the Sub-Adviser in return for its services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II |
|
California |
|
New York |
|
|||
Purchases |
|
$ |
297,059,881 |
|
$ |
2,388,320 |
|
$ |
16,999,700 |
|
Sales |
|
|
418,168,904 |
|
|
160,207,802 |
|
|
16,776,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Interest rate swap agreements outstanding at November 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate Type |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Swap Counterparty |
|
Notional |
|
Termination |
|
Payments |
Payments |
|
Unrealized |
|
|||
Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Bank |
|
$ |
111,400 |
|
12/17/28 |
|
5.00 |
% |
3-Month USD-LIBOR |
|
$ |
(25,045,836 |
) |
Morgan Stanley |
|
|
159,600 |
|
12/18/33 |
|
5.00 |
% |
3-Month USD-LIBOR |
|
|
(42,856,719 |
) |
Royal Bank of Scotland |
|
|
79,800 |
|
12/18/33 |
|
5.00 |
% |
3-Month USD-LIBOR |
|
|
(21,225,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(89,128,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Bank |
|
$ |
34,600 |
|
12/17/28 |
|
5.00 |
% |
3-Month USD-LIBOR |
|
$ |
(7,779,048 |
) |
Merrill Lynch & Co. |
|
|
26,700 |
|
12/17/28 |
|
5.00 |
% |
3-Month USD-LIBOR |
|
|
(5,928,147 |
) |
Morgan Stanley |
|
|
88,200 |
|
12/18/33 |
|
5.00 |
% |
3-Month USD-LIBOR |
|
|
(23,683,976 |
) |
Royal Bank of Scotland |
|
|
43,900 |
|
12/18/33 |
|
5.00 |
% |
3-Month USD-LIBOR |
|
|
(11,676,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(49,067,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch & Co. |
|
$ |
17,900 |
|
12/17/28 |
|
5.00 |
% |
3-Month USD-LIBOR |
|
$ |
(3,974,301 |
) |
Morgan Stanley |
|
|
25,300 |
|
12/18/33 |
|
5.00 |
% |
3-Month USD-LIBOR |
|
|
(6,793,703 |
) |
Royal Bank of Scotland |
|
|
12,800 |
|
12/18/33 |
|
5.00 |
% |
3-Month USD-LIBOR |
|
|
(3,404,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(14,172,628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR London Inter-Bank Offered Rate
Municipal II, California Municipal II and New York Municipal II received $1,200,000, $600,000 and $200,000, respectively, in U.S. Treasury Bills as collateral for swaps.
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 33
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
||||
Municipal II |
|
$ |
1,250,545,307 |
|
$ |
19,805,090 |
|
$ |
183,623,841 |
|
$ |
(163,818,751 |
) |
California Municipal II |
|
|
621,918,622 |
|
|
7,197,684 |
|
|
100,018,065 |
|
|
(92,820,381 |
) |
New York Municipal II |
|
|
229,987,366 |
|
|
4,461,311 |
|
|
32,972,925 |
|
|
(28,511,614 |
) |
5. Auction Preferred Shares
California Municipal II has issued 2,080 shares of Preferred Shares Series A, 2,080 shares of Preferred Shares Series B, 2,080 shares of Preferred Shares Series C, 2,080 shares of Preferred Shares Series D and 2,080 shares of Preferred Shares Series E, each with a net asset and liquidation value of $25,000 per share plus accrued dividends.
New York Municipal II has issued 1,800 shares of Preferred Shares Series A and 1,800 shares of Preferred Shares Series B, each with a net asset and liquidation value of $25,000 per share plus accrued dividends.
Dividends are accumulated daily at an annual rate (typically re-set every seven days) through auction procedures. Distributions of net realized capital gains, if any, are paid annually.
For the six months ended November 30, 2008, the annualized dividend rates ranged from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
At November 30, 2008 |
|
Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
11.347 |
% |
1.608 |
% |
1.608 |
% |
Series B |
|
12.565 |
% |
1.564 |
% |
1.564 |
% |
Series C |
|
12.261 |
% |
1.584 |
% |
1.597 |
% |
Series D |
|
11.728 |
% |
1.569 |
% |
1.597 |
% |
Series E |
|
10.205 |
% |
1.569 |
% |
1.569 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
11.347 |
% |
1.608 |
% |
1.608 |
% |
Series B |
|
12.565 |
% |
1.564 |
% |
1.564 |
% |
Series C |
|
12.261 |
% |
1.584 |
% |
1.597 |
% |
Series D |
|
11.728 |
% |
1.569 |
% |
1.597 |
% |
Series E |
|
10.205 |
% |
1.569 |
% |
1.569 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
12.261 |
% |
1.584 |
% |
1.597 |
% |
Series B |
|
10.205 |
% |
1.569 |
% |
1.569 |
% |
The Funds are subject to certain limitations and restrictions while Preferred Shares are outstanding. Failure to comply with these limitations and restrictions could preclude the Funds from declaring any dividends or distributions to common shareholders or repurchasing common shares and/or could trigger the mandatory redemption of Preferred Shares at their liquidation value.
Preferred Shares, which are entitled to one vote per share, generally vote with the common shares but vote separately as a class to elect two Trustees and on any matters affecting the rights of the Preferred Shares.
Since mid-February 2008, holders of auction-rate preferred shares (ARPS) issued by the Funds have been directly impacted by an unprecedented lack of liquidity, which has similarly affected ARPS holders in many of the nations closed-end funds.
34 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Notes to Financial Statements |
November 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
These developments with respect to ARPS have not affected the management or investment policies of the Funds, and the Funds outstanding common shares continue to trade on the NYSE. If the Funds ARPS auctions continue to fail and the maximum rate payable on the ARPS rises as a result of changes in short-term interest rates, returns for the Funds common shareholders could be adversely affected.
6. Subsequent Common Dividend Declarations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Per |
|
Declaration |
|
Payable |
|
Record |
|
|
Municipal II |
|
$ |
0.065 |
|
1/8/09 |
|
1/23/09 |
|
1/20/09 |
|
California Municipal II |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
1/6/09 |
|
1/21/09 |
|
1/16/09 |
|
New York Municipal II |
|
$ |
0.06625 |
|
12/31/08 |
|
12/31/08 |
|
12/11/08 |
|
|
||||||||||
Municipal II |
|
$ |
0.065 |
|
1/8/09 |
|
2/2/09 |
|
1/20/09 |
|
California Municipal II |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
1/6/09 |
|
2/2/09 |
|
1/16/09 |
|
New York Municipal II |
|
$ |
0.06625 |
|
1/13/09 |
|
2/2/09 |
|
1/23/09 |
|
See Subsequent Event Notes, pages 41-43.
7. Legal Proceedings
Since February 2004, the Investment Manager and certain of its affiliates and their employees have been named as defendants in a number of pending lawsuits concerning market timing, which allege the same or similar conduct underlying the regulatory settlements discussed above. The market timing lawsuits have been consolidated in a multi-district litigation proceeding in the U.S. District Court of Maryland. Any potential resolution of these matters may include, but not be limited to, judgments or settlements for damages against the Investment Manager or its affiliates or related injunctions.
The Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser believe that these matters are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or on their ability to perform their respective investment advisory activities relating to the Funds.
The foregoing speaks only as of the date hereof.
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 35
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Financial Highlights |
For a share of common stock outstanding throughout each period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
Year ended May 31, |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
13.86 |
|
|
$ |
15.05 |
|
|
$ |
14.71 |
|
|
$ |
14.81 |
|
|
$ |
14.01 |
|
|
$ |
14.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts, options written and swaps |
|
|
(5.57 |
) |
|
|
(1.24 |
) |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
|
(0.77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
(5.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Preferred Shares from Net Investment Income |
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shareholders resulting from investment operations |
|
|
(5.17 |
) |
|
|
(0.41 |
) |
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Common Shareholders from Net Investment Income |
|
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
(0.82 |
) |
|
|
(0.96 |
) |
|
|
(1.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
|
$ |
8.30 |
|
|
$ |
13.86 |
|
|
$ |
15.05 |
|
|
$ |
14.71 |
|
|
$ |
14.81 |
|
|
$ |
14.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Market price, end of period |
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
14.14 |
|
|
$ |
15.42 |
|
|
$ |
14.45 |
|
|
$ |
15.02 |
|
|
$ |
13.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return (1) |
|
|
(41.34 |
)% |
|
|
(3.09 |
)% |
|
|
12.64 |
% |
|
|
2.63 |
% |
|
|
21.00 |
% |
|
|
(3.69 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to common shareholders, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
492,402 |
|
|
$ |
819,740 |
|
|
$ |
886,815 |
|
|
$ |
862,832 |
|
|
$ |
862,290 |
|
|
$ |
812,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets including interest expense (2)(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
1.99 |
%# |
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
|
1.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets, excluding interest expense (2)(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
1.30 |
%# |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
1.01 |
% |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
|
1.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (2)(5) |
|
|
9.15 |
%# |
|
|
7.90 |
% |
|
|
7.45 |
% |
|
|
7.31 |
% |
|
|
7.71 |
% |
|
|
8.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Preferred shares asset coverage per share |
|
$ |
49,371 |
|
|
$ |
65,570 |
|
|
$ |
68,889 |
|
|
$ |
67,701 |
|
|
$ |
67,676 |
|
|
$ |
65,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
Annualized. |
(1) |
Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of a share of common stock at the current market price on the first day of each period and a sale of a share of common stock at the current market price on the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions are assumed, for purposes of this calculation, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Funds dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment return does not reflect brokerage commissions or sales charges. Total investment return for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
(2) |
Calculated on the basis of income and expenses applicable to both common and preferred shares relative to the average net assets of common shareholders. |
(3) |
Inclusive of expenses offset by custody credits earned on cash balances at the custodian bank. (See note 1(i) in Notes to Financial Statements). |
(4) |
Interest expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in connection with inverse floater transactions. |
(5) |
During the periods indicated above, the Investment manager waived a portion of its investment management fee. The effect of such waiver relative to the average net assets of common shareholders was 0.10% (annualized), 0.17%, 0.24%, 0.24%, 0.24% and 0.25% for the period ended November 30, 2008, years ended May 31, 2008, May 31, 2007, May 31, 2006, May 31, 2005, and May 31, 2004, respectively. |
36 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08 | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Financial Highlights |
For a share of common stock outstanding throughout each period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
Year ended May 31, |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
|
$ |
14.89 |
|
|
$ |
14.58 |
|
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
$ |
13.53 |
|
|
$ |
14.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts, options written and swaps |
|
|
(5.86 |
) |
|
|
(1.49 |
) |
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
(1.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
(5.35 |
) |
|
|
(0.43 |
) |
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
2.18 |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Preferred Shares from Net Investment Income |
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shareholders resulting from investment operations |
|
|
(5.50 |
) |
|
|
(0.71 |
) |
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Common Shareholders from Net Investment Income |
|
|
(0.42 |
) |
|
|
(0.84 |
) |
|
|
(0.84 |
) |
|
|
(0.93 |
) |
|
|
(0.98 |
) |
|
|
(0.93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
|
$ |
7.42 |
|
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
|
$ |
14.89 |
|
|
$ |
14.58 |
|
|
$ |
14.61 |
|
|
$ |
13.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Market price, end of period |
|
$ |
6.44 |
|
|
$ |
14.25 |
|
|
$ |
15.96 |
|
|
$ |
14.62 |
|
|
$ |
14.76 |
|
|
$ |
13.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return (1) |
|
|
(52.98 |
)% |
|
|
(5.17 |
)% |
|
|
15.35 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
19.14 |
% |
|
|
(3.92 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to common shareholders, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
228,638 |
|
|
$ |
409,769 |
|
|
$ |
455,284 |
|
|
$ |
443,379 |
|
|
$ |
441,596 |
|
|
$ |
407,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets including interest expense (2)(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
3.27 |
%# |
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
2.02 |
% |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets, excluding interest expense (2)(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
1.36 |
%# |
|
|
1.18 |
% |
|
|
1.01 |
% |
|
|
1.06 |
% |
|
|
1.06 |
% |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (2)(5) |
|
|
8.93 |
%# |
|
|
7.65 |
% |
|
|
7.28 |
% |
|
|
7.24 |
% |
|
|
7.37 |
% |
|
|
8.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Preferred shares asset coverage per share |
|
$ |
46,980 |
|
|
$ |
64,390 |
|
|
$ |
68,765 |
|
|
$ |
67,620 |
|
|
$ |
67,451 |
|
|
$ |
64,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
|
%(6) |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
Annualized. |
(1) |
Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of a share of common stock at the current market price on the first day of each period and a sale of a share of common stock at the current market price on the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions are assumed, for purposes of this calculation, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Funds dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment return does not reflect brokerage commissions or sales charges. Total investment return for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
(2) |
Calculated on the basis of income and expenses applicable to both common and preferred shares relative to the average net assets of common shareholders. |
(3) |
Inclusive of expenses offset by custody credits earned on cash balances at the custodian bank. (See note 1(i) in Notes to Financial Statements). |
(4) |
Interest expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in connection with inverse floater transactions. |
(5) |
During the periods indicated above, the Investment manager waived a portion of its investment management fee. The effect of such waiver relative to the average net assets of common shareholders was 0.10% (annualized), 0.17%, 0.24%, 0.24%, 0.24% and 0.24% for the period ended November 30, 2008, years ended May 31, 2008, May 31, 2007, May 31, 2006, May 31, 2005, and May 31, 2004, respectively. |
(6) |
Amount is less than 1%. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements | 11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 37
|
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II Financial Highlights |
For a share of common stock outstanding throughout each period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Year ended May 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
13.67 |
|
|
$ |
14.79 |
|
|
$ |
14.66 |
|
|
$ |
14.62 |
|
|
$ |
13.54 |
|
|
$ |
14.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts, options written and swaps |
|
|
(4.71 |
) |
|
|
(1.11 |
) |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
(0.97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
|
|
(4.20 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Preferred Shares from net investment income |
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shareholders resulting from investment operations |
|
|
(4.35 |
) |
|
|
(0.33 |
) |
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Common Shareholders from Net Investment Income |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(0.79 |
) |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
(0.91 |
) |
|
|
(0.98 |
) |
|
|
(0.93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
|
$ |
8.92 |
|
|
$ |
13.67 |
|
|
$ |
14.79 |
|
|
$ |
14.66 |
|
|
$ |
14.62 |
|
|
$ |
13.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Market price, end of period |
|
$ |
8.14 |
|
|
$ |
14.42 |
|
|
$ |
15.49 |
|
|
$ |
14.14 |
|
|
$ |
14.80 |
|
|
$ |
13.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total Investment Return (1) |
|
|
(41.51 |
)% |
|
|
(1.46 |
)% |
|
|
15.51 |
% |
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
21.45 |
% |
|
|
(5.15 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to common shareholders, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
94,936 |
|
|
$ |
145,100 |
|
|
$ |
156,218 |
|
|
$ |
154,088 |
|
|
$ |
152,812 |
|
|
$ |
140,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets including interest expense (2)(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
1.78 |
%# |
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
1.89 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets, excluding interest expense (2)(3)(4)(5) |
|
|
1.39 |
%# |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (2)(5) |
|
|
8.31 |
%# |
|
|
7.69 |
% |
|
|
7.33 |
% |
|
|
7.29 |
% |
|
|
7.53 |
% |
|
|
7.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Preferred shares asset coverage per share |
|
$ |
51,365 |
|
|
$ |
65,294 |
|
|
$ |
68,386 |
|
|
$ |
67,785 |
|
|
$ |
67,439 |
|
|
$ |
64,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
Annualized. |
(1) |
Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of a share of common stock at the current market price on the first day of each period and a sale of a share of common stock at the current market price on the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions are assumed, for purposes of this calculation, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Funds dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment return does not reflect brokerage commissions or sales charges. Total investment return for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
(2) |
Calculated on the basis of income and expenses applicable to both common and preferred shares relative to the average net assets of common shareholders. |
(3) |
Inclusive of expenses offset by custody credits earned on cash balances at the custodian bank. (See note 1(i) in Notes to Financial Statements). |
(4) |
Interest expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in connection with inverse floater transactions. |
(5) |
During the periods indicated above, the Investment manager waived a portion of its investment management fee. The effect of such waiver relative to the average net assets of common shareholders was 0.10% (annualized), 0.17%, 0.24%, 0.24%, 0.24% and 0.24% for the period ended November 30, 2008, years ended May 31, 2008, May 31, 2007, May 31, 2006, May 31, 2005, and May 31, 2004, respectively. |
38 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08 | See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II |
Matters Relating to the
Trustees |
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees (the Trustees) and a majority of the non-interested (Independent) Trustees, voting separately, approve the Funds Management Agreements (the Advisory Agreements) with the Investment Manager and Portfolio Management Agreements (the Sub-Advisory Agreements, and together with the Advisory Agreements, the Agreements) between the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser. The Trustees met on June 10-11, 2008 (the contract review meeting) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the Advisory Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from Fund management during the contract review meeting.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described below, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, concluded that the continuation of the Funds Advisory Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements should be approved for a one-year period commencing July 1, 2008.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the Agreements, the Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment management, administrative and other services performed by the Investment Manager or the Sub-Adviser under the applicable Agreement.
In connection with their contract review meeting, the Trustees received and relied upon materials provided by the Investment Manager which included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc. (Lipper) on the total return investment performance (based on net assets) of the Funds for various time periods and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives as the Funds identified by Lipper and the performance of applicable benchmark indices, (ii) information provided by Lipper on the Funds management fees and other expenses and the management fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper, (iii) information regarding the investment performance and management fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of the Sub-Advisers, (iv) the profitability to the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser from their relationship with the Funds for the twelve months ended March 31, 2008, (v) descriptions of various functions performed by the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser for the Funds, such as portfolio management, compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (vi) information regarding the overall organization of the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser, including information regarding senior management, portfolio managers and other personnel providing investment management, administrative and other services to the Funds.
The Trustees conclusions as to the continuation of the Agreements were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees deliberations (described below), although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors.
As part of their review, the Trustees examined the Investment Managers and the Sub-Advisers abilities to provide high quality investment management and other services to the Funds. The Trustees considered the investment philosophy and research and decision-making processes of the Sub-Adviser; the experience of key advisory personnel of the Sub-Adviser responsible for portfolio management of the Funds; the ability of the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain capable personnel; the capability and integrity of the senior management and staff of the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser; and the level of skill required to manage the Funds. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the quality of the Investment Managers and the Sub-Advisers services with respect to regulatory compliance and compliance with the investment policies of the Funds; the nature and quality of certain administrative services the Investment Manager is responsible for providing to the Funds; and conditions that might affect the Investment Managers or the Sub-Advisers ability to provide high quality services to the Funds in the future under the Agreements, including each organizations respective business reputation, financial condition and operational stability. Based on the foregoing, the Trustees concluded that the Sub-Advisers investment process, research capabilities and philosophy were well suited to the Funds given their investment objectives and policies, and that the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser would be able to continue to meet any reasonably foreseeable obligations under the Agreements.
Based on information provided by Lipper, the Trustees also reviewed each Funds total return investment performance as well as the performance of comparable funds identified by Lipper. In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by the Investment Manager in connection with the contract review meeting, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding each Funds performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of each Funds fees under the Agreements, the Trustees considered, among other information, each Funds management fee and the total expense ratio as a percentage of average net assets attributable to common shares and the management fee and total expense ratios of comparable funds identified by Lipper.
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 39
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II |
Matters Relating to the Trustees |
For each of the Funds, the Trustees specifically took note of how each Fund compared to its Lipper peers as to performance, management fee expenses and total expenses. The Trustees noted that the Investment Manager had provided a memorandum containing comparative information on the performance and expenses information of the Funds compared to the their Lipper peer categories. The Trustees noted that while the Funds are not charged a separate administration fee, it was not clear whether the peer funds in the Lipper categories were charged such a fee by their investment managers.
|
Municipal II: |
The Trustees noted that PML had outperformed its peer groups low returns but had underperformed its peer groups median and high returns for the one-year and three-year periods ended March 31, 2008. The Trustees noted that PML had outperformed its peer groups median and low returns but had underperformed its peer groups high returns for the five-year period ended March 31, 2008. The Trustees also noted that PMLs expense ratio (after taking into account waivers) was below the high for its peer group but above the median and the low for its peer group. |
|
California Municipal II: |
The Trustees noted that PCK had outperformed its peer groups low returns for the one-year, three-year and five-year periods but had underperformed its peer groups median and high returns for the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ended March 31, 2008. The Trustees also noted that PCKs expense ratio (after taking into account waivers) was above the median and low for its peer group and was in line with its peer groups high. |
|
New York Municipal II: |
The Trustees noted that PNI had outperformed its peer groups low returns but had underperformed its peer groups median and high returns for the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ended March 31, 2008. The Trustees also noted that PNIs expense ratio (after taking into account waivers) was below the high for its peer group but above the median and the low for its peer group. |
|
After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Agreements, that they were satisfied with the Investment Managers and the Sub-Advisers responses and efforts relating to investment performance and the comparative positioning of each Fund with respect to the management fee paid to the Investment Manager. |
|
The Trustees noted that the management fees paid by the Funds are generally higher than the fees paid by the open-end funds offered for comparison but were advised that there are additional portfolio management challenges in managing the Funds, such as the use of leverage and meeting a regular dividend. |
|
The Trustees also took into account that the Funds have preferred shares outstanding, which increases the amount of fees received by the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser under the Agreements (because the fees are calculated based on either the Funds net assets or total managed assets, including assets attributable to preferred shares and other forms of leverage outstanding but not deducting any liabilities connected to the leverage). In this regard, the Trustees took into account that the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser have a financial incentive for the Funds to continue to have preferred shares outstanding, which may create a conflict of interest between the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser, on one hand, and the Funds common shareholders, on the other. In this regard, the Trustees considered information provided by the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser indicating that each Funds use of leverage through preferred shares continues to be appropriate and in the interests of the respective Funds common shareholders. |
Based on a profitability analysis provided by the Investment Manager, the Trustees also considered the profitability of the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser from their relationship with each Fund and determined that such profitability was not excessive.
The Trustees also took into account that, as closed-end investment companies, the Funds do not currently intend to raise additional assets, so the assets of the Funds will grow (if at all) only through the investment performance of each Fund. Therefore, the Trustees did not consider potential economies of scale as a principal factor in assessing the fee rates payable under the Agreements.
Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called fall-out benefits to the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser, such as reputational value derived from serving as Investment Manager and Sub-Adviser to the Funds.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded with respect to each Fund, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Agreements, that the fees payable under the Agreements represent reasonable compensation in light of the nature and quality of the services being provided by the Investment Manager and Sub-Adviser to the Funds.
40 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II Subsequent Events (unaudited) |
Subsequent Event Municipal II Postponement of Payment and Declaration of Common Share Dividend
On December 1, 2008, Municipal II announced that due to recent market conditions and requirements under the Funds By-laws and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act) it has postponed the payment of the previously declared (November 3, 2008) dividend on the Funds common shares scheduled for payment on December 1, 2008 and the declaration of the next dividend on the Funds common shares, which would have been paid on December 31, 2008.
The declared dividend ($0.065 per common share) payable on December 1, 2008 to the shareholders of record on November 13, 2008, with an ex-dividend date of November 10, 2008, was not paid on December 1, 2008.
In accordance with the 1940 Act and the Funds By-laws, the Fund is not permitted to pay or declare common share dividends unless the Funds ARPS have a minimum asset coverage of 200% (200% Level) after payment of the common share dividend or declaration of the common share dividend. Due to continued severe market dislocations and recent further erosions in the municipal market, the value of the Funds portfolio securities has declined, which has caused the Funds asset coverage ratio to fall below the 200% Level.
On January 8, 2009, Municipal II announced that the previously declared November dividend of $0.065 per common share, which was declared on November 3, 2008 and postponed on December 1, 2008 will be paid on January 8, 2009 to shareholders of record on November 13, 2008.
In addition, the Municipal II also announced that it declared a $0.065 per common share dividend for December 2008 and a $0.065 per common share dividend for January 2009.
The dividend declared for December 2008 will be payable on January 23, 2009 to shareholders of record on January 20, 2009, with an ex-dividend date of January 15, 2009. The dividend declared for January 2009 will be payable on February 2, 2009 to shareholders of record on January 20, 2009, with an ex-dividend date of January 15, 2009.
|
Subsequent Event Municipal II Partial Redemption of Auction Rate Preferred Shares (ARPS) |
On December 18, 2008, Municipal II announced that it will redeem, at par value, $138 million of its ARPS beginning January 5, 2009 and concluding January 9, 2009. The redemption was transacted at the full liquidation preference of $25,000 per share plus accumulated but unpaid dividends.
The decision to redeem a portion of the Funds ARPS was made by the Funds Board of Trustees at the recommendation of the Investment Manager and Sub-Adviser and is intended to increase asset coverage of the Funds ARPS above the 200% Level (subject to future market conditions), permitting the Fund to pay the previously declared common share dividend originally scheduled to be paid in December, 2008 and to declare future common share dividends.
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 41
|
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II Subsequent Events (unaudited) |
Subsequent Event California Municipal II Postponement of Payment and Declaration of Common Share Dividend
On December 1, 2008, California Municipal II announced that due to recent market conditions and requirements under the Funds By-laws and the 1940 Act, it has postponed the payment of the previously declared (November 3, 2008) dividend on the Funds common shares scheduled for payment on December 1, 2008 and the declaration of the next dividend on the Funds common shares, which would have been paid on December 31, 2008.
The declared dividend ($0.07 per common share) payable on December 1, 2008 to the shareholders of record on November 13, 2008, with an ex-dividend date of November 10, 2008, was not paid on December 1, 2008.
In accordance with the 1940 Act and the Funds By-laws, the Fund is not permitted to pay or declare common share dividends unless the Funds auction rate preferred shares (ARPS) have a minimum asset coverage of 200% (200% Level) after payment of the common share dividend or declaration of the common share dividend. Due to continued severe market dislocations and recent further erosions in the municipal market, the value of the Funds portfolio securities has declined, which has caused the Funds asset coverage ratio to fall below the 200% Level.
On January 6, 2009, California Municipal II announced that the previously declared November dividend of $0.07 per common share, which was declared on November 3, 2008 and postponed on December 1, 2008 will be paid on January 6, 2009 to shareholders of record on November 13, 2008.
In addition, California Municipal II also announced that it declared a $0.07 per common share dividend for December 2008 and a $0.07 per common share dividend for January 2009.
The dividend declared for December 2008 will be payable on January 21, 2009 to shareholders of record on January 16, 2009, with an ex-dividend date of January 14, 2009. The dividend declared for January 2009 will be payable on February 2, 2009 to shareholders of record on January 16, 2009, with an ex-dividend date of January 14, 2009.
|
Subsequent Event California Municipal II Partial Redemption of Auction Rate Preferred Shares (ARPS) |
On December 18, 2008, California Municipal II announced that it will redeem, at par value $97 million of its ARPS beginning January 5, 2009 and concluding January 9, 2009. The redemption was transacted at the full liquidation preference of $25,000 per share plus accumulated but unpaid dividends.
The decision to redeem a portion of the Funds ARPS was made by the Funds Board of Trustees at the recommendation of the Investment Manager and Sub-Adviser and is intended to increase asset coverage of the Funds ARPS above the 200% Level (subject to future market conditions), permitting the Fund to pay the previously declared common share dividend originally scheduled to be paid in December, 2008 and to declare future common share dividends.
42 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II |
New York Municipal II Subsequent Events/ |
Subsequent Event New York Municipal II Postponement of Payment and Declaration of Common Share Dividend
On December 31, 2008, New York Municipal II announced that due to recent market conditions and requirements under the Funds By-laws and the 1940 Act, it has postponed the payment of the previously declared (December 1, 2008) dividend on the Funds common shares scheduled for payment on December 31, 2008 and the declaration of the next dividend on the Funds common shares, which would have been paid on February 2, 2009.
The declared dividend ($0.06625 per common share) payable on December 31, 2008 to the shareholders of record on December 11, 2008, with an ex-dividend date of December 9, 2008, was not paid on December 31, 2008.
In accordance with the 1940 Act and the Funds By-laws, the Fund is not permitted to pay or delcare common share dividends unless the Funds auction rate preferred shares (ARPS) have a minimum asset coverage of 200% (200% Level) after payment of the common share dividend or declaration of the common share dividend. Due to continued severe market dislocations and recent further erosions in the municipal market, the value of the Funds portfolio securities has declined, which has caused the Funds asset coverage ratio to fall below the 200% Level.
On January 12, 2009, New York Municipal II announced that the previously declared December dividend of $0.06625 per common share, which was declared on December 1, 2008 and postponed on December 31, 2008 will be paid on January 12, 2009 to shareholders of record on December 11, 2008.
On January 13, 2009, New York Municipal II declared a $0.06625 per common share dividend for January 2009. The dividend will be payable February 2, 2009 to shareholders of record January 23, 2009, with an ex-dividend date of January 21, 2009.
|
Subsequent Event New York Municipal II Partial Redemption of Auction Rate Preferred Shares (ARPS) |
On January 9, 2009, New York Municipal II announced that it will redeem, at par value $11 million of its ARPS beginning January 26, 2009 and concluding January 29, 2009. The redemption was transacted at the full liquidation preference of $25,000 per share plus accumulated but unpaid dividends.
The decision to redeem a portion of the ARPS was made by the Funds Board of Trustees at the recommendation of the Investment Manager and Sub-Adviser and is intended to increase asset coverage of the ARPS above the 200% Level (subject to future market conditions), permitting New York Municipal II to pay the previously declared common share dividend originally scheduled to be paid in December 2008 and to declare future common share dividends.
|
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures: |
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds have adopted to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities and information about how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities held during the twelve month period ended June 30 is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Funds shareholder servicing agent at (800) 331-1710; (ii) on the Funds website at www.allianzinvestors.com/closedendfunds; and (iii) on the Securities and Exchange Commissions website at www.sec.gov.
11.30.08 | PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report 43
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II |
Annual Shareholder Meetings Results |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affirmative |
|
Withheld |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-Election of R. Peter Sullivan III |
|
|
48,215,403 |
|
|
3,828,730 |
|
Re-Election of John C. Maney |
|
|
48,230,919 |
|
|
3,813,214 |
|
Election of Diana L. Taylor* |
|
|
15,441 |
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-Election of R. Peter Sullivan III |
|
|
26,123,380 |
|
|
2,551,859 |
|
Re-Election of John C. Maney |
|
|
26,076,993 |
|
|
2,598,246 |
|
Election of Diana L. Taylor* |
|
|
7,956 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York Municipal II: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-Election of R. Peter Sullivan III |
|
|
9,500,031 |
|
|
717,431 |
|
Re-Election of John C. Maney |
|
|
9,497,856 |
|
|
719,606 |
|
Election of Diana L Taylor* |
|
|
3,511 |
|
|
262 |
|
Messrs. Hans W. Kertess*, Robert E. Connor, William B. Ogden IV and Paul Belica continue to serve as Trustees of the Funds.
Mr. John Dalessandro served as a Trustee of the Funds until his death on September 14, 2008.
|
|
|
|
* Preferred Shares Trustee |
44 PIMCO Municipal Income Funds II Semi-Annual Report | 11.30.08
|
|
Hans W. Kertess |
Brian S. Shlissel |
Trustee, Chairman of the Board of Trustees |
President & Chief Executive Officer |
Paul Belica |
Lawrence G. Altadonna |
Trustee |
Treasurer, Principal Financial & Accounting Officer |
Robert E. Connor |
Thomas J. Fuccillo |
Trustee |
Vice President, Secretary & Chief Legal Officer |
John C. Maney |
Scott Whisten |
Trustee |
Assistant Treasurer |
William B. Ogden, IV |
Richard J. Cochran |
Trustee |
Assistant Treasurer |
R. Peter Sullivan III |
Youse E. Guia |
Trustee |
Chief Compliance Officer |
Diana L. Taylor |
William V. Healey |
Trustee |
Assistant Secretary |
|
Richard H. Kirk |
|
Assistant Secretary |
|
Kathleen A. Chapman |
|
Assistant Secretary |
|
Lagan Srivastava |
|
Assistant Secretary |
Investment Manager
Allianz Global Investors Fund
Management LLC
1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105
Sub-Adviser
Pacific Investment Management Company
LLC
840 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Custodian &
Accounting Agent
State Street Bank & Trust Co.
225 Franklin Street
Boston, MA 02110
Transfer Agent,
Dividend Paying Agent and Registrar
PNC Global Investment Servicing
P.O. Box 43027
Providence, RI 02940-3027
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
300 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Legal Counsel
Ropes & Gray LLP
One International Place
Boston, MA 02110-2624
This report, including the financial information herein, is transmitted to the shareholders of PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II and PIMCO New York Income Fund II for their information. It is not a prospectus, circular or representation intended for use in the purchase of shares of the Funds or any securities mentioned in this report.
The financial information included herein is taken from the records of the Funds without examination by an independent registered accounting firm, who did not express an option hereon.
Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, that from time to time the Funds may purchase shares of its common stock in the open market.
The Funds file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of their fiscal years on Form N-Q. Each Funds Form N-Q is available on the SECs website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330. The information on Form N-Q is also available on the Funds website at www.allianzinvestors.com/closedendfunds.
On January 9, 2009, each Fund submitted a CEO annual certification to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on which the Funds principal executive officer certified that he was not aware, as of the date, of any violation by the Funds of the NYSEs Corporate Governance listing standards. In addition, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules, each Funds principal executive and principal financial officer made quarterly certifications, included in filings with the SEC on Forms N-CSR and N-Q relating to, among other things, the Funds disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, as applicable.
Information on the Funds is available at www.allianzinvestors.com/closedendfunds or by calling the Funds shareholder servicing agent at (800) 331-1710.
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS
Not required in this filing.
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Not required in this filing.
ITEM 4.
Not required in this filing.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANT
Not required in this filing.
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
Schedule of Investments is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this form.
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not required in this filing.
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
(a)(1)
As of February 4, 2009, the following individual has primary responsibility for the day-to-day implementation of the PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II (PML), PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II (PCK) and PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II (PNI) (each a Fund and collectively, the Funds):
John S. Cummings
Mr. Cummings has been the portfolio manager for the Fund since December
11, 2008. Mr. Cummings is an executive vice president and a municipal bond
portfolio manager at PIMCO in the Newport Beach office. Prior to joining PIMCO
in 2002, he was vice president, municipal trading at Goldman Sachs, responsible
for a number of municipal sectors, including industrials, airlines, utilities,
healthcare and high-yield. He has 20 years of investment experience and holds
an MBA, as well as his undergraduate degree, from Rutgers University.
(a)(2)
The following summarizes information regarding each of the accounts, excluding the respective Fund managed by the Portfolio Manager as of December 31, 2008, including accounts managed by a team, committee, or other group that includes the Portfolio Manager. Unless mentioned otherwise, the advisory fee charged for managing each of the accounts listed below is not based on performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered Investment Companies |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other Accounts |
|||
PM |
Fund |
# |
AUM($million) |
# |
AUM($million) |
# |
AUM($million) |
John S. |
PML |
19 |
4,175.20 |
4 |
677.58 |
52 |
2,905.83 |
PCK |
19 |
4,647.12 |
4 |
677.58 |
52 |
2,905.83 |
|
|
PNI |
19 |
4,936.88 |
4 |
677.58 |
52 |
2, 905.88 |
From time to time, potential conflicts of interest may arise between a portfolio managers management of the investments of a fund, on the one hand, and the management of other accounts, on the other. The other accounts might have similar investment objectives or strategies as the funds, track the same index a fund tracks or otherwise hold, purchase, or sell securities that are eligible to be held, purchased or sold by the funds. The other accounts might also have different investment objectives or strategies than the funds.
Knowledge and Timing of Fund Trades. A potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the portfolio managers day-to-day management of a fund. Because of their positions with the funds, the portfolio managers know the size, timing and possible market impact of a funds trades. It is theoretically possible that the portfolio managers could use this information to the advantage of other accounts they manage and to the possible detriment of a fund.
Investment Opportunities. A potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the portfolio managers management of a number of accounts with varying investment guidelines. Often, an investment opportunity may be suitable for both a fund and other accounts managed by the portfolio manager, but may not be available in sufficient quantities for both the fund and the other accounts to participate fully. Similarly,
there may be limited opportunity to sell an investment held by a fund and another account. PIMCO has adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to allocate investment opportunities on a fair and equitable basis over time.
Under PIMCOs allocation procedures, investment opportunities are allocated among various investment strategies based on individual account investment guidelines and PIMCOs investment outlook. PIMCO has also adopted additional procedures to complement the general trade allocation policy that are designed to address potential conflicts of interest due to the side-by-side management of the funds and certain pooled investment vehicles, including investment opportunity allocation issues.
Performance Fees. A portfolio manager may advise certain accounts with respect to which the advisory fee is based entirely or partially on performance. Performance fee arrangements may create a conflict of interest for the portfolio manager in that the portfolio manager may have an incentive to allocate the investment opportunities that he or she believes might be the most profitable to such other accounts instead of allocating them to a fund. PIMCO has adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to allocate investment opportunities between the funds and such other accounts on a fair and equitable basis over time.
(a) (3)
As of December 31, 2008, the following explains the compensation structure of the individual that shares primary responsibility for day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds:
PIMCO has adopted a Total Compensation Plan for its professional level employees, including its portfolio managers, that is designed to pay competitive compensation and reward performance, integrity and teamwork consistent with the firms mission statement. The Total Compensation Plan includes a significant incentive component that rewards high performance standards, work ethic and consistent individual and team contributions to the firm. The compensation of portfolio managers consists of a base salary, a bonus, and may include a retention bonus. Portfolio managers who are Managing Directors of PIMCO also receive compensation from PIMCOs profits. Certain employees of PIMCO, including portfolio managers, may elect to defer compensation through PIMCOs deferred compensation plan. PIMCO also offers its employees a non-contributory defined contribution plan through which PIMCO makes a contribution based on the employees compensation. PIMCOs contribution rate increases at a specified compensation level, which is a level that would include portfolio managers.
Salary and Bonus. Base salaries are determined by considering an individual portfolio managers experience and expertise and may be reviewed for adjustment annually. Portfolio managers are entitled to receive bonuses, which may be significantly more than their base salary, upon attaining certain performance objectives based on predetermined measures of group or department success. These goals are specific to individual portfolio managers and are mutually agreed upon annually by each portfolio manager and his or her manager. Achievement of these goals is an important, but not exclusive, element of the bonus decision process.
In addition, the following non-exclusive list of qualitative criteria (collectively, the Bonus Factors) may be considered when determining the bonus for portfolio managers:
|
|
|
|
|
3-year, 2-year and 1-year dollar-weighted and account-weighted, pre-tax investment performance as judged against the applicable benchmarks for each account managed by a portfolio manager (including the funds) and relative to applicable industry peer groups; |
|
|
|
|
|
Appropriate risk positioning that is consistent with PIMCOs investment philosophy and the Investment Committee/CIO approach to the generation of alpha; |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and nature of assets managed by the portfolio manager; |
|
|
|
|
|
Consistency of investment performance across portfolios of similar mandate and guidelines (reward low dispersion); |
|
|
|
|
|
Generation and contribution of investment ideas in the context of PIMCOs secular and cyclical forums, portfolio strategy meetings, Investment Committee meetings, and on a day-to-day basis; |
|
|
|
|
|
Absence of defaults and price defaults for issues in the portfolios managed by the portfolio manager; |
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions to asset retention, gathering and client satisfaction; |
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions to mentoring, coaching and/or supervising; and |
|
|
|
|
|
Personal growth and skills added. |
A portfolio managers compensation is not based directly on the performance of any fund or any other account managed by that portfolio manager. Final bonus award amounts are determined by the PIMCO Compensation Committee.
Investment professionals, including portfolio managers, are eligible to participate in a Long Term Cash Bonus Plan (Cash Bonus Plan), which provides cash awards that appreciate or depreciate based upon the performance of PIMCOs parent company, Allianz Global Investors, and PIMCO over a three-year period. The aggregate amount available for distribution to participants is based upon Allianz Global Investors profit growth and PIMCOs profit growth. Participation in the Cash Bonus Plan is based upon the Bonus Factors, and the payment of benefits from the Cash Bonus Plan, is contingent upon continued employment at PIMCO.
Key employees of PIMCO, including certain Managing Directors, Executive Vice Presidents, and Senior Vice Presidents, are eligible to participate in the PIMCO Class M Unit Equity Participation Plan, a long-term equity plan. The Class M Unit Equity Participation Plan grants options on PIMCO equity that vest in years three, four and five. Upon vesting, the options will convert into PIMCO M Units, which are non-voting common equity of PIMCO. M Units pay out quarterly distributions equal to a pro-rata share of PIMCOs net profits. There is no assured liquidity and they may remain outstanding perpetually.
Profit Sharing Plan. Instead of a bonus, portfolio managers who are Managing Directors of PIMCO receive compensation from a non-qualified profit sharing plan consisting of a portion of PIMCOs net profits. Portfolio managers who are Managing Directors receive an amount determined by the Partner Compensation Committee, based upon an individuals overall contribution to the firm and the Bonus Factors. Under his employment agreement, William Gross receives a fixed percentage of the profit sharing plan.
Allianz Transaction Related Compensation. In May 2000, a majority interest in the predecessor holding company of PIMCO was acquired by a subsidiary of Allianz AG (currently known as Allianz SE) (Allianz). In connection with the transaction, Mr. Gross received a grant of restricted stock of Allianz, the last of which vested on May 5, 2005.
Portfolio managers who are Managing Directors also have long-term employment contracts, which guarantee severance payments in the event of involuntary termination of a Managing Directors employment with PIMCO.
(a)(4)
The following summarizes the dollar range of securities the portfolio manager for the Funds beneficially owned of the Funds that he managed as of 12/31/08.
|
|
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II |
|
Portfolio Manager |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Fund |
John S. Cummings |
None |
ITEM 9.
Purchase of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Companies
None
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Funds Board of Trustees since the Fund last provided disclosure in response to this item.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) The registrants President and Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer, Principal Financial & Accounting Officer have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-2(c) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a -3(c))), as amended are effective based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this document.
(b) There were no significant changes over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a -3(d))) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants control over financial reporting.
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS
(a) (1) Exhibit 99.302 Cert. - Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(b) Exhibit 99.906 Cert. - Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II
By /s/ Brian S. Shlissel
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date February 4, 2009
By /s/ Lawrence G. Altadonna
Treasurer,
Principal Financial & Accounting Officer
Date February 4, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By /s/ Brian S. Shlissel
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date February 4, 2009
By /s/ Lawrence G. Altadonna
Treasurer,
Principal Financial & Accounting Officer
Date February 4, 2009