FORM S-4
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2005
Registration No. 333 -
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
INTERNATIONAL COAL GROUP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
1222
|
|
20-2641185 |
(State or other jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification
Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification
Number) |
2000 Ashland Drive
Ashland, Kentucky 41101
(606) 920-7400
(Address, including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, including Area Code, of Registrants Principal
Executive Offices)
William D. Campbell
Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary
International Coal Group, Inc.
2000 Ashland Drive
Ashland, Kentucky 41101
(606) 920-7400
(Name, Address, including
Zip Code, and Telephone Number, including Area Code, of Agent For Service)
With copies to:
Randi L. Strudler, Esq.
Jones Day
222 East 41st Street
New York, New York 10017
(212) 326-3939
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the securities to the public: As
soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective and upon completion of the
reorganization described in the enclosed prospectus.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the
formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the
following box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule
462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities
Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the
earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount to be |
|
|
|
Proposed maximum |
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
Title of each class of securities to be registered |
|
|
registered (1) |
|
|
|
offering price per unit (2) |
|
|
|
aggregate offering price |
|
|
|
registration fee |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share |
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
|
$ |
165,239,300.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
19,450.00 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the number of common shares to be issued in connection with the reorganization
of ICG, Inc. |
(2) |
|
Pursuant to Rule 457(f) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registration fee is
based on the book value of ICG, Inc. common shares computed as of March 31, 2005. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be
necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in
accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this Registration Statement
shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these
securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting
offers to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, JUNE 27, 2005
International Coal Group, Inc.
2000 Ashland Drive
Ashland, Kentucky 41101
, 2005
Dear ICG Shareholder:
International Coal Group has agreed to acquire Anker Coal Group, Inc. and CoalQuest
Development LLC.
The transactions will be carried out through a holding company reorganization. In the
reorganization, (1) the existing International Coal Group, Inc. changed its name to ICG, Inc.,
and (2) a new company will become the holding company for ICG, Anker and CoalQuest and adopt the
name International Coal Group, Inc. Shareholders who acquired shares of old International Coal
Group when it was organized in 2004 will receive shares of the new holding company in a
one-for-one tax-free exchange. The directors and officers of old International Coal Group will
become the directors and officers of the new holding company.
The reorganization is being completed to facilitate the acquisitions of Anker and CoalQuest,
on a tax-deferred basis. The acquisitions are complete, subject only to the issuance of shares of
new International Coal Group being registered under the federal securities laws and other customary
conditions, such as the absence of material litigation. As a result of the registration, all
International Coal Group common shares held by former ICG shareholders will be freely tradable,
other than shares beneficially owned by directors, officers and other affiliates. The new holding
company also plans to sell common shares to the public in a registered public offering, although
there is no assurance that the public offering will be completed.
Further shareholder approvals are not required to complete the reorganization or the
acquisitions. Stock certificates which previously represented old International Coal Group common
shares will represent shares of new International Coal Group after the transactions. As a
consequence, shareholders need not do anything at this time. After the reorganization is effected,
shareholders owning registered shares may have any legends removed unless they are held by
directors, officers or other affiliates.
The attached prospectus provides you with detailed information about ICG, International Coal Group,
the reorganization and the acquisitions. The attached prospectus also contains a copy of the
public offering preliminary prospectus for additional information about these matters. Please
carefully review the entire prospectus, including the matters discussed under Risk Factors
beginning on page 7 of the attached prospectus and page 13 of the attached public offering
preliminary prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. |
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or
disapproved of the securities to be offered pursuant to this prospectus or passed upon the adequacy
or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This prospectus is dated , 2005, and is first being mailed to shareholders on or
about , 2005.
REFERENCES TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about International
Coal Group from other documents that are not included in or delivered with this prospectus. More
information is available without charge to security holders upon written or oral request. Request
should be made to International Coal Group at the following address or telephone number:
International Coal Group, Inc.
2000 Ashland Drive
Ashland, Kentucky 41101
(606) 920-7400
Attention: William D. Campbell
See Where You Can Find
More Information on page 35.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
The registration statement of which this prospectus is a part contains (1) the prospectus
relating to the reorganization and (2) the preliminary prospectus contained in the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-124393) relating to the business of International Coal
Group, Inc. (on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the reorganization and the acquisitions of
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and CoalQuest Development LLC) and a public offering.
|
|
|
In this prospectus, we sometimes refer to: |
|
as: |
|
|
|
Acquisitions of each of Anker and CoalQuest
|
|
Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions |
|
|
|
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
Anker |
|
|
|
Proven and probable coal reserves,
consisting of the part of a mineral
deposit that can be economically and
legally extracted or produced at the time
of the reserve determination
|
|
coal reserves |
|
|
|
Inferred and indicated reserves,
consisting of coal bearing bodies that
have been sufficiently sampled and
analyzed, but do not qualify as a
commercially viable coal reserve as
prescribed by SEC rules until a final
comprehensive SEC prescribed evaluation is
performed
|
|
coal resources |
|
|
|
CoalQuest Development LLC
|
|
CoalQuest |
|
|
|
Horizon NR, LLC (the entity holding the
operating subsidiaries of Horizon Natural
Resources Company) and its consolidated
subsidiaries
|
|
Horizon |
|
|
|
ICG, Inc.
|
|
ICG |
|
|
|
International Coal Group, Inc.
|
|
International Coal Group, we, our, us and similar terms |
|
|
|
Preliminary prospectus of International
Coal Group, dated as of June 15, 2005,
attached as Annex A relating to
International Coal Groups proposed public
offering of its common stock contained in
its registration statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-124393)
|
|
public offering preliminary prospectus |
|
|
|
WL Ross & Co. LLC
|
|
WLR |
-ii-
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE REORGANIZATION AND ACQUISITIONS
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Who are ICG and International Coal Group? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
ICG, Inc. is the current name of the entity formerly known as International Coal Group, Inc. when it acquired certain
assets of Horizon Natural Resources Company in September 2004. In anticipation of the acquisitions of Anker and CoalQuest,
International Coal Group, Inc. (now called ICG, Inc.) formed ICG Holdco, Inc. to act as the holding company for Anker,
CoalQuest and itself. The name of ICG Holdco was changed to International Coal Group, Inc. After the reorganization,
International Coal Group will own ICG and all former ICG shareholders will become International Coal Group shareholders. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What is the purpose of the reorganization? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
The reorganization is being completed to facilitate the acquisitions of Anker and CoalQuest on a tax-deferred basis. The
reorganization will be on a tax-free basis for ICG shareholders. After the reorganization, former ICG shareholders, as
well as former Anker and CoalQuest shareholders, will become shareholders of the new parent holding company, International
Coal Group. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What will I receive in the reorganization? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
ICG shareholders will receive one International Coal Group common share for each ICG common share owned immediately prior
to the reorganization. Existing stock certificates representing ICG common shares will represent International Coal Group
common shares following the reorganization. You need not send your stock certificates to us. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
How does the reorganization relate to the public offering? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Neither the reorganization nor the acquisitions are conditioned on the public offering. However, the value of the shares
to be issued in the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions will be based on the public offering price if such offering is
consummated prior to March 2006. See The Reorganization for more information on the calculation of the number of shares
to be issued in connection with the acquisitions. If the public offering occurs, we expect that the shares sold in that
offering, together with the shares being issued in this reorganization, will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol ICO. If we do not consummate the public offering, the shares you receive in this offering will not be listed
on a national securities exchange. However, unless you are an affiliate of International Coal Group, your International
Coal Group common shares will not be subject to any restrictions on transfer under the federal securities laws. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What are the tax consequences of the reorganization? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
The reorganization and exchange of shares are intended to qualify as transactions in which no gain or loss is recognized by
ICG shareholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In general, you will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax
solely as a result of the receipt of shares of International Coal Group in exchange for your ICG common shares if you are a
citizen or resident of the United States. However, you should consult your own tax advisor as to your particular U.S.
federal, state, local and other tax consequences. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What shareholder or other approvals are needed to approve the reorganization? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
ICG has received irrevocable proxies from holders of a majority of all issued and outstanding common shares authorizing ICG
to vote those shares in favor of the reorganization. No further board or shareholder action is required for the
reorganization to be completed and, therefore, we are not soliciting your vote. Additionally, the waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, or HSR, has been terminated, and all other conditions to the closing of the
acquisitions and reorganization, have occurred, other than the absence of material litigation and similar technical
conditions such as the delivery of required closing documents. |
1
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
No further action by any shareholder is required to effect the reorganization. You do not need to send in your stock
certificates. Your current ICG stock certificates will represent shares in International Coal Group following the
reorganization. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
When do you expect the reorganization to be completed? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
We expect to complete the reorganization on or about the same time that we complete the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions.
We intend to complete the reorganization and the acquisitions as soon as possible after the effectiveness of the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What rights do I have if I oppose the reorganization? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Any holder of ICG common stock who otherwise complies with the requirements and procedures of Section 262 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, or DGCL, is entitled to exercise rights of appraisal, which generally entitle shareholders to
receive a cash payment equal to the judicially determined fair value of the ICG common stock in connection with the
reorganization. A detailed description of the appraisal rights and procedures available to ICG shareholders is included in
The Reorganization Appraisal Rights. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What is the purpose of this document? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that registers the shares of International Coal Group that you will
receive in connection with the reorganization under the federal securities laws. If you are not an affiliate of
International Coal Group, the common shares you receive in the reorganization will not be subject to any transfer
restrictions under the federal securities laws. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Will my ownership interest be diluted? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Not by the reorganizationin the reorganization, shares are being converted on a one-to-one basis. However, the issuance
of shares in the acquisitions and the proposed public offering will result in increasing the number of International Coal
Group common shares outstanding. This will have the effect of proportionately decreasing the percentage share ownership
held by the existing ICG common shareholders who do not also have ownership interests in Anker and CoalQuest. As of May
31, 2005, there were 106,605,999 ICG common shares outstanding. The maximum number of ICG shares to be issued in
connection with the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions is 30,950,129, subject to possible adjustments. As the following
chart illustrates, the higher the offering price per share of International Coal Group common stock in the proposed public
offering, fewer International Coal Group common shares will be issued in connection with the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions. See Business Our history The Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions on page 80 of the public offering
preliminary prospectus for more information on acquisition adjustments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Coal
Group common stock
offering price |
|
|
$ |
8.885 |
|
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
11.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
12.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
13.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
|
ICG common shares
issued in Anker and
CoalQuest
acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without adjustments |
|
|
|
30,950,129 |
|
|
|
|
27,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
22,916,667 |
|
|
|
|
21,153,846 |
|
|
|
|
19,642,857 |
|
|
|
|
18,333,333 |
|
|
|
With adjustments |
|
|
|
29,824,670 |
|
|
|
|
26,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
24,090,000 |
|
|
|
|
22,083,333 |
|
|
|
|
20,384,615 |
|
|
|
|
18,928,571 |
|
|
|
|
17,666,667 |
|
|
|
Furthermore, the shares issued in the proposed public offering will dilute existing shareholders
proportionately.
2
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Who can help answer my questions about the reorganization? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
If you would like additional copies of this document, or if you would
like to ask any additional questions about the reorganization and the
acquisitions, you should contact: |
International Coal Group, Inc.
2000 Ashland Drive
Ashland, Kentucky 41101
(606) 920-7400
Attention: William D. Campbell
3
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this document. It does not contain all of
the information that is important to you. We urge you to carefully read the entire document and
the other documents to which we refer in order to fully understand the reorganization and the
related transactions. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 35. Each item
in this summary refers to the page of this document on which that subject is discussed in more
detail.
OVERVIEW
ICG was formed by WLR and other investors in May 2004 to acquire and operate competitive coal
mining facilities. As of September 30, 2004, ICG acquired certain key assets of Horizon through a
bankruptcy auction. These assets are high quality reserves strategically located in Appalachia and
the Illinois Basin, are union free, have limited reclamation liabilities and are substantially free
of other legacy liabilities. Due to ICGs initial capitalization, it was able to complete the
acquisition without incurring a significant level of indebtedness. Consistent with the WLR
investor groups strategy to consolidate profitable coal assets, ICG intends to acquire Anker and
CoalQuest to further diversify its reserves.
The reorganization
ICG is proposing to undergo a corporate reorganization to facilitate the combination of Anker
and CoalQuest with ICG. In the corporate reorganization, ICG shareholders will receive one
International Coal Group common share for each ICG common share owned immediately prior to the
reorganization.
The Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions
On March 31, 2005, ICG entered into an agreement to acquire Anker for the lesser of (1)
19,498,581 International Coal Group common shares and (2) the number of International Coal Group
common shares equal to 173,250,000 divided by the price per share at which International Coal
Groups stock is offered in the public offering, subject to certain possible adjustments as
described on page 80 of the public offering preliminary prospectus.
On March 31, 2005, International Coal Group also entered into an agreement to acquire
CoalQuest, for the lesser of (1) 11,451,548 International Coal Group common shares and (2) the
number of common shares equal to 101,750,000 divided by the price per share at which International
Coal Groups common stock is offered in the public offering.
The former Anker and CoalQuest shareholders will be granted certain piggyback registration
rights with respect to the International Coal Group common shares issued to them. For additional
information on registration rights, see Description of capital stock Registration rights
beginning on page 126 of the public offering preliminary prospectus.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANIES (Page 8)
ICG, Inc.
ICG is a leading producer of coal in Central Appalachia, with mining complexes located in
Kentucky and West Virginia. ICG has a complementary mining complex located in the Illinois Basin.
ICG acquired its current properties in 2004 from Horizon through a bankruptcy auction.
ICGs principal executive offices are located at 2000 Ashland Drive, Ashland, Kentucky 41101
and its telephone number is (606) 920-7400.
International Coal Group, Inc.
International Coal Group was formed in March 2005 to be ICGs new top-tier parent holding
company following the reorganization. International Coal Group has no operations and no
significant assets. Following the completion of the reorganization and acquisitions,
International Coal Group will own, through ICG, all of the ICG
4
business as well as Anker and CoalQuest. For a description of International Coal Groups
business after giving effect to the reorganization and acquisitions, see Business beginning on
page 78 of the public offering preliminary prospectus.
International Coal Groups principal executive offices are located at 2000 Ashland Drive,
Ashland, Kentucky 41101 and its telephone number is (606) 920-7400.
Anker Coal Group and CoalQuest
Anker produces coal from mining complexes in West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland and
Pennsylvania. It leases a majority of its coal reserves from CoalQuest. CoalQuest has no other
material operations other than its leasing activity.
INTERNATIONAL COAL GROUP MANAGEMENT FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE REORGANIZATION AND ACQUISITIONS
(Page 20)
The Board of Directors and executive officers of International Coal Group will be the same as
the current Board of Directors and executive officers of ICG.
APPRAISAL RIGHTS (Page 22)
Under Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, record holders of ICG common shares
are entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the reorganization. Failure to follow the
procedures required by Section 262 of the DGCL for perfecting appraisal rights may result in the
loss of appraisal rights. If an ICG shareholder withdraws his or her demand for appraisal or has
his or her appraisal rights terminated, that holder of ICG common shares will only be entitled to
receive the reorganization consideration consisting of one International Coal Group common share
for one ICG common share.
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT (Page 23)
For accounting purposes, our reorganization will be accounted for as a transfer of assets and
exchange of shares between entities under common control. As such, the transaction will be
accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling-of-interests. Accordingly, the financial position
and results of operations of ICG will be included in our consolidated financial statements on a
historical cost basis.
EFFECTIVE TIME OF REORGANIZATION (Page 24)
The Anker merger and ICG reorganization will become effective upon the filing of certificates
of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware or at such later time as may be
agreed upon by ICG and Anker and as specified in the certificates of merger. The filing of the
certificates of merger will occur as soon as practicable after the effectiveness of the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
CONDITIONS TO COMPLETION OF THE REORGANIZATION (Page 26)
Substantially all of the conditions to the completion of the reorganization have been
satisfied, other than the absence of material litigation and certain formal conditions such as the
delivery of closing documents. The acquisitions and reorganization are not conditioned upon the
completion of International Coal Groups public offering and, in fact, are expected to be completed
prior to the completion of such offering.
TERMINATION OF THE ANKER BUSINESS COMBINATION AGREEMENT (Page 26)
The Anker business combination agreement may be terminated by either party upon the happening
of specified events, including by mutual consent and if the mergers have not occurred by April
2006.
COMPARISON OF
SHAREHOLDERS RIGHTS (Page 28)
The rights of ICG shareholders will not change as a result of the reorganization, but will
change upon the closing of a public offering. If a public offering is consummated, certain of the
provisions of International Coal Groups certificate of incorporation that are the same as the ICG
certificate of incorporation will terminate and
5
certain new provisions will become effective. In general, the provisions being terminated
provide special governance rights to the ICG shareholders who sponsored ICGs formation last year.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF ICG
See Selected historical consolidated financial data of ICG on page 49 of the public offering
preliminary prospectus.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF INTERNATIONAL COAL GROUP, INC.
International Coal Group was formed to facilitate the combination of Anker and CoalQuest with
ICG and is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of ICG. If International Coal Group had existed and
owned ICG prior to completion of the reorganization and acquisitions, International Coal Group
believes that its consolidated financial statements would have been substantially identical to
those of ICG and its predecessors for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. See
Selected consolidated financial data of ICG on page 49 of the public offering preliminary
prospectus.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED PRO
FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
See
Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data on page 41 of the public offering
preliminary prospectus.
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
ICG currently owns all of the outstanding International Coal Group common shares and,
therefore, there is no public market for International Coal Groups common shares. ICG common
shares are currently reported on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service. No comparative per
share data is presented because such information would not be meaningful to investors. For
information regarding the high and low quotes for the ICG common shares since November 15, 2004,
see Price range of ICG, Inc. common stock on page 36 of the public offering preliminary
prospectus.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
See Special note regarding forward-looking statements on page 35 of the public offering
preliminary prospectus.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF ICG
See Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations,
beginning on page 52 of the public offering preliminary prospectus.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL COAL GROUP, INC.
International Coal Group was formed for the purpose of facilitating the acquisitions of Anker
and CoalQuest and is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of ICG. If International Coal Group had
existed and owned ICG prior to completion of the reorganization and acquisitions, International
Coal Group believes that its consolidated financial statements would have been substantially
identical to those of ICG and its predecessors for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002. Please refer to Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations beginning on page 52 in the public offering preliminary prospectus for additional
information.
6
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described below and in the public offering preliminary
prospectus before deciding whether or not to exercise your appraisal rights. If you do not
exercise your appraisal rights, you will be choosing to invest in the common stock of International
Coal Group. Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. If any of the following
risks (including those described in the public offering preliminary prospectus) develop into actual
events, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely
affected, the trading price of your shares of our common stock could decline and you may lose all
or part of your investment.
RISK FACTORS RELATING TO OUR REORGANIZATION
Failure to obtain a listing on the New York Stock Exchange may result in there being no active
market for the International Coal Group common shares issued in the reorganization.
In connection with the public offering, we will apply for listing our common shares, including
those to be issued in the reorganization, on the New York Stock Exchange. We cannot assure you
that the public offering will be completed or that these shares will be approved for listing on the
New York Stock Exchange. International Coal Groups common shares may not be listed on the New
York Stock Exchange if they fail to meet any listing criterion. If we are unable to list common
shares on the New York Stock Exchange, there will be no established trading market for
International Coal Groups shares, and it is likely that no active trading market would develop for
these shares. If no market develops for the International Coal Group common shares, there could be
an adverse effect on the trading prices for the common shares.
There is no assurance as to the value you can receive by exercising dissenters rights.
Under Section 262 of the DGCL record holders of ICG common shares are entitled to appraisal
rights in connection with the reorganization. If an ICG shareholder exercises his or her demand
for appraisal and follows the procedures specified in Section 262 of the DGCL, summarized in The
Reorganization Appraisal Rights, he or she will have the right to receive cash payment of the
fair value of his or her common shares. The express procedures of Section 262 must be followed
and, if they are not, shareholders may lose their right to appraisal. The fair value cash
payment for the ICG shares would potentially be determined in judicial proceedings, the result of
which cannot be predicted. There can be no assurance that shareholders exercising appraisal rights
will receive consideration equal to or greater than the value of International Coal Group common
shares to be owned by such shareholders following consummation of the reorganization.
OTHER RISK FACTORS
For a description of the risks relating to the coal industry business, the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions and International Coal Groups common stock, see Risk factors in the public offering
preliminary prospectus beginning on page 13.
7
INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANIES
BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL COAL GROUP
International Coal Group was formed in March 2005 to be ICGs new top-tier parent holding
company following the reorganization. International Coal Group has no operations and no
significant assets. International Coal Group is a wholly owned subsidiary of ICG. Following the
completion of the reorganization and acquisitions, International Coal Group will essentially be the
same entity as ICG had ICG not undergone the reorganization. For a description of International
Coal Groups business after giving effect to the reorganization and acquisitions, see Business
beginning on page 78 of the public offering preliminary prospectus.
BUSINESS ICG
Overview
ICG, Inc. is a leading producer of coal in Central Appalachia, with a broad range of
mid-to-high Btu, low sulfur steam. ICGs Central Appalachian mining complexes, which include four
of its mining complexes, are located in West Virginia and Kentucky. ICG also has a complementary
mining complex of mid-to-high sulfur steam coal, strategically located in the Illinois Basin. ICG
markets its coal to a diverse customer base of largely investment grade electric utilities, as well
as domestic industrial customers. The high quality of International Coal Groups coal, and the
availability of multiple transportation options, including rail, truck and barge, throughout the
Appalachian region, enable ICG to participate in both the domestic and international coal markets.
Due to the decline in Appalachian coal production in recent years, these markets are currently
characterized by strong demand with limited supply response and elevated spot and contract prices.
ICG was formed by WLR and other investors in May 2004 to acquire and operate competitive coal
mining facilities. As of September 30, 2004, ICG acquired certain key assets of Horizon through a
bankruptcy auction. These assets are high-quality reserves, are union free, have limited
reclamation liabilities, and are substantially free of other legacy liabilities. Due to ICGs
initial capitalization, ICG was able to complete the acquisition without incurring a significant
level of indebtedness. Consistent with the WLR investor groups strategy to consolidate profitable
coal assets ICG intends to consummate the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions to further diversify
ICGs reserves.
As of January 1, 2005, ICG owned or controlled approximately 510 million tons of steam coal
reserves. Based on expected 2005 production rates, ICGs Central Appalachian reserves could
support existing production levels for approximately 16 years. Further, ICG owns or controls
approximately 564 million tons of coal resources.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, ICG sold 14.0 million tons of coal, all of which was
steam coal. ICGs steam coal sales volume in 2004 consisted of mid-to-high quality, high Btu
(greater than 12,000 Btu/lb.), low sulfur (1.5% or less) coal, which typically sells at a premium
to lower quality, lower Btu, higher sulfur steam coal. ICGs three largest customers for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 were Georgia Power Company, Carolina Power & Light Company and Duke
Power and ICG derived approximately 63% of its coal revenues from sales to its five largest
customers.
ICGS HISTORY
The Horizon acquisition
On February 28, 2002, Horizon (at that time operating as AEI Resources Holdings, Inc.) filed a
voluntary petition for Chapter 11 and its plan of reorganization became effective on May 8, 2002.
However, Horizons profit margins and cash flows were negatively impacted in fiscal year 2002 by,
among other things, the falling price of coal and continued increases in certain operating
expenses. Due to capital and permit constraints, Horizon had to mine in areas which produced coal
but at greatly reduced profit margins thus severely reducing cash flow.
As a result of its continuing financial and operational difficulties, Horizon filed a second
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 on November 13, 2002. Horizon obtained a
debtor-in-possession financing facility of up to $350.0 million and was effective in rationalizing
its operations, selling noncore assets, paying down outstanding
8
borrowings and generating substantial operating profit. With stabilized operations and a
significantly improved coal market, Horizon filed a joint plan of reorganization and a joint plan
of liquidation under Chapter 11.
The Horizon assets were sold to ICG through a bankruptcy auction on August 17, 2004.
Presented as a combined $290.0 million cash bid with A.T. Massey, ICG, Inc. agreed to pay $285.0
million in cash plus the assumption of up to $5.0 million in cure costs to acquire the assets plus
ICG also contributed a credit bid of second lien Horizon bonds, and A.T. Massey agreed to pay $5.0
million in cash to acquire a separate group of assets associated with two Horizon subsidiaries.
The credit bid included the cancellation of $482.0 million of certain Horizon bonds in return for
which those Horizon bondholders received the right to participate in a rights offering to purchase
ICG common stock. Shares issued in connection with the rights offering are included in ICGs
outstanding stock. The former bondholders of Horizon that purchased shares of ICG common stock in
the rights offering were creditors of Horizon and received the shares in reliance on Section 1145
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, which in general provides for the limited exemption from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act for securities issued in exchange for a claim
against the debtor in bankruptcy. Since ICGs formation, some trading of ICG, Inc.s common stock
has occurred. See Price range of ICG, Inc. common stock on page 36 of the public offering
preliminary prospectus. ICG has not previously been a reporting company under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
In addition, Lexington Coal Company, LLC, a newly formed entity, was organized by the founding
ICG shareholders to assume certain reclamation liabilities and assets not otherwise being purchased
by A.T. Massey or ICG. In order to provide support to Lexington Coal in consideration for assuming
these liabilities, ICG agreed to provide a $10.0 million letter of credit to support reclamation
obligations and to pay a 0.75% royalty on the gross sales receipts for coal mined and sold from the
assets ICG acquired from Horizon until the completion by Lexington Coal of all reclamation
liabilities acquired from Horizon. Other than this support and a limited commonality of ownership
of ICG and Lexington Coal Company, there is no relationship between the entities.
The bankruptcy court confirmed the sale on September 16, 2004 as part of the completion of the
Horizon bankruptcy proceedings. At closing, ICG increased the purchase price by $6.25 million,
primarily to satisfy increased administrative expenses, and the sale was completed as of September
30, 2004.
The acquisition was financed through equity investments and borrowings under ICGs senior
secured credit facility, which ICG entered into at the closing of the Horizon acquisition. See
Description of indebtedness on page 123 of the public offering preliminary prospectus for a
discussion of ICGs senior credit facility.
COAL RESERVES
Reserves are defined by SEC Industry Guide 7 as that part of a mineral deposit which could
be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.
Proven (Measured) Reserves are defined by SEC Industry Guide 7 as reserves for which (1) quantity
is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or
quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (2) the sites for inspection,
sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that
size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well-established. Probable reserves are
defined by SEC Industry Guide 7 as reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are
computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for
inspection, sampling, and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced.
The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to
assume continuity between points of observation.
ICG estimates that there are approximately 183 million tons of coal reserves that can be
developed by its existing operations which will allow ICG to maintain current production levels for
an extended period of time. ICG Natural Resources, LLC owns and leases all of ICGs reserves that
are not currently assigned to or associated with one of its mining operations. These reserves
contain approximately 327 million tons of mid-to-high Btu, low and high sulfur coal located in
Kentucky, West Virginia and Illinois. ICGs multi-region base and flexible product line allows ICG
to adjust to changing market conditions and sustain high sales volume by supplying a wide range of
customers.
9
ICGs total coal reserves could support current production levels for more than 43 years. The
following table provides the quality (average Btu content, sulfur content and ash content per
pound) of its coal reserves as of January 1, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Total tons in millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality characteristics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proven and |
|
|
of tons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as received) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Probable as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 1/1/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve |
|
|
heat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
life |
|
|
content |
|
|
Sulfur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining companies |
|
State |
|
|
of tons)(1) |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
(Btu/lb) |
|
|
(%) |
|
|
Ash(%) |
|
|
Steam |
|
Central Appalachia: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG Knott County |
|
|
KY |
|
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
|
5.81 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
5.29 |
|
|
|
12,700 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
6.73 |
|
ICG Hazard |
|
|
KY |
|
|
|
71.38 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
71.15 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
71.38 |
|
ICG East
Kentucky |
|
|
KY |
|
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
2.62 |
|
ICG Eastern |
|
|
WV |
|
|
|
23.69 |
|
|
|
7.27 |
|
|
|
16.42 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
23.69 |
|
ICG Natural Resources(2) |
|
|
WV |
|
|
|
44.90 |
|
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
42.70 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
44.90 |
|
ICG Natural Resources(3) |
|
|
KY |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Appalachia
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
155.22 |
|
|
|
19.91 |
|
|
|
135.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153.72 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG Illinois |
|
|
IL |
|
|
|
29.63 |
|
|
|
11.38 |
|
|
|
18.25 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
29.63 |
|
ICG Natural
Resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
325.21 |
|
|
|
305.10 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
326.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
354.84 |
|
|
|
316.48 |
|
|
|
38.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
510.06 |
|
|
|
336.39 |
|
|
|
173.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510.06 |
|
(1) |
|
Recoverable reserves represent the amount of coal reserves that can actually be recovered
taking into account all mining and preparation losses involved in producing a saleable product
using existing methods under current law. The reserve numbers set forth in this table exclude
reserves for which ICG has leased its mining rights to third parties. Reserve information
reflects a moisture factor of approximately 6.0%. This moisture factor represents the average
moisture present on ICGs delivered coal. |
|
(2) |
|
ICG Natural Resources (Jennys Creek) |
|
(3) |
|
ICG Natural Resources (Mount Sterling) |
ICGs reserve estimate is based on geological data assembled and analyzed by its staff of
geologists and engineers. Reserve estimates are periodically updated to reflect past coal
production, new drilling information and other geologic or mining data. Acquisitions or sales of
coal properties will also change the reserve base. Changes in mining methods may increase or
decrease the recovery basis for a coal seam as will plant processing efficiency tests. ICG
maintains reserve information in secure computerized databases, as well as in hard copy. The
ability to update and/or modify the reserve base is restricted to a few individuals and the
modifications are documented.
10
Actual reserves may vary substantially from the estimates. Estimated minimum recoverable
reserves are comprised of coal that is considered to be merchantable and economically recoverable
by using mining practices and techniques prevalent in the coal industry at the time of the reserve
study, based upon then-current prevailing market prices for coal. ICG uses the mining method that
it believes will be most profitable with respect to particular reserves. ICG believes the volume
of its current reserves exceeds the volume of its contractual delivery requirements. Although the
reserves shown in the table above include a variety of qualities of coal, ICG presently blends coal
of different qualities to meet contract specifications. See Risk factorsRisks relating to our
business beginning on page 13 of the public offering preliminary prospectus.
Periodically, ICG retains outside experts to independently verify its coal reserve base. The
most recent review was completed during the first quarter of 2005 and covered all of ICGs
reserves. The results verified ICGs reserve estimates, with very minor adjustments, and included
an in-depth review of ICGs procedures and controls. As of January 1, 2005, Marshall Miller &
Associates, Inc. confirmed ICGs reserve base of 510 million tons on a consolidated basis.
ICG currently owns approximately 66% of its coal reserves, with the remainder of its coal
reserves subject to leases from third-party landowners. Generally, these leases convey mining
rights to the coal producer in exchange for a percentage of gross sales in the form of a royalty
payment to the lessor, subject to minimum payments. Leases generally last for the economic life of
the reserves. The average royalties paid by ICG for coal reserves from its producing properties
was $1.35 per ton in 2004, representing approximately 3.9% of its coal sales revenue in 2004.
Consistent with industry practice, ICG conducts only limited investigations of title to its coal
properties prior to leasing. Title to lands and reserves of the lessors or grantors and the
boundaries of its leased priorities are not completely verified until ICG prepares to mine those
reserves.
COAL RESOURCES
Coal resources are coal-bearing bodies that have been sufficiently sampled and analyzed in
trenches, outcrops, drilling, and underground workings to assume continuity between sample points,
and therefore warrants further exploration stage work. However, this coal does not qualify as a
commercially viable coal reserve as prescribed by SEC standards until a final comprehensive
evaluation based on unit cost per ton, recoverability, and other material factors concludes legal
and economic feasibility. Resources may be classified as such by either limited property control
or geologic limitations, or both.
11
The following table provides the quality (average Btu content, sulfur content and ash
content per pound) of ICG coal resources as of January 1, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality characteristics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable |
|
|
(as received) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resources as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 1/1/2005 |
|
|
Heat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions |
|
|
content |
|
|
Sulfur |
|
|
Ash |
|
|
|
|
Mining companies |
|
State |
|
|
of tons) |
|
|
(Btu/lb) |
|
|
(%) |
|
|
(%) |
|
|
Steam |
|
Central Appalachia: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG - Knott County |
|
KY
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
12,700 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
8.49 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
|
ICG - Hazard |
|
KY
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
11.29 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
|
ICG - East Kentucky |
|
KY
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
12.29 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
|
ICG - Eastern |
|
WV
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
12.29 |
% |
|
|
0.02 |
|
ICG - Natural Resources(1) |
|
WV
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
12.29 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
|
ICG - Natural Resources(2) |
|
KY
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
12.09 |
% |
|
|
0.01 |
|
Central Appalachia Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG Illinois |
|
IL
|
|
|
38.47 |
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
9.59 |
% |
|
|
38.47 |
|
ICG Natural Resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
522.52 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
522.52 |
|
Other Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
560.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560.99 |
|
Total Resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
564.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564.24 |
|
(1) |
|
ICG Natural Resources (Jennys Creek) |
|
(2) |
|
ICG Natural Resources (Mount Sterling) |
OPERATIONS
As of December 31, 2004, ICG operated a total of eight surface and five underground coal mines
located in Kentucky, West Virginia and Illinois. Historically, approximately 70% of ICGs
production has come from surface mines, and the remaining production has come from its underground
mines. These mining facilities include three preparations plants, each of which receive, blend,
process and ship coal that is produced from one or more of ICGs 13 active mines. ICGs
underground mines generally consist of one or more single or dual continuous miner sections which
are made up of the continuous miner, shuttle cars, roof bolters and various ancillary equipment.
ICGs surface mines are a combination of mountain top removal, dragline, truck/loader equipment
fleets along with large production tractors. Most of ICGs preparation plants are modern heavy
media plants that generally have both coarse and fine coal cleaning circuits. ICG currently leases
most of the equipment utilized in its mining operations. ICG employs preventive maintenance and
rebuild programs to ensure that its equipment is modern and well maintained. The mobile equipment
utilized at ICGs mining operation is scheduled to be replaced on an on-going basis with new, more
efficient units during the next five years. Each year ICG endeavors to replace the oldest units,
thereby maintaining productivity while minimizing capital expenditures. The following table
provides summary information regarding ICGs principal mining complexes as of December 31, 2004.
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type of mines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preparation |
|
|
Under- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
produced |
|
Mining complex |
|
Location |
|
|
plant(s) |
|
|
ground |
|
|
Surface |
|
|
Total |
|
|
method(1) |
|
|
Transportation |
|
|
in 2004 |
|
ICG - Eastern, LLC |
|
Cowen, WV |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
MTR-DL-TSL |
|
Rail |
|
|
2,712.1 |
|
ICG - Hazard, LLC |
|
Hazard, KY |
|
|
1 |
(2) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
R&P-CM, HW |
|
Rail |
|
|
3,978.0 |
|
ICG - Knott County, LLC |
|
Kite, KY |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
MTR-TSL, CM |
|
Rail |
|
|
1,386.6 |
|
ICG - East Kentucky, LLC |
|
Pike Co., KY |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
MTR-TSL |
|
Rail |
|
|
1,576.3 |
|
ICG - Illinois, LLC |
|
Williamsville, IL |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
R&P-CM |
|
Truck |
|
|
2,117.6 |
|
(1) |
|
R&P = Room and Pillar; MTR = Mountain Top Removal; DL = Dragline; HW = Highwall; CM =
Continuous Miner; TSL = Truck and Shovel/Loader |
|
(2) |
|
Expected to begin operation in second half of 2005 |
The following provides a description of the operating characteristics of the principal
mines and reserves of each of ICGs mining operations.
MINING OPERATIONS
Central Appalachia mining operations
ICGs Central Appalachian mining facilities are strategically located across West Virginia and
Kentucky and are used to produce and ship coal to its customers located primarily in the eastern
half of the United States. ICG believes that the quality and experience of its workforce in
Central Appalachia are among the highest in the coal mining industry. All of ICGs Central
Appalachia mining operations are union free.
ICGs mines in Central Appalachia produced 9.7 million tons of coal in 2004. The coal
produced in 2004 was, on average, 12,174 Btu/lb, 1.1% sulfur and 12.5% ash by content. This year
ICG estimates that its mines in Central Appalachia region will produce approximately 10.3 million
tons. This high Btu, low sulfur coal is very marketable to major utility customers throughout the
eastern United States. Shipments to electric utilities, accounted for approximately 73% of the
coal shipped by these mines in 2004, compared to 75% of shipments in 2003. Within each mining
complex, mines have been developed at strategic locations in proximity to ICGs preparation plants
and rail shipping facilities. The mines located in Central Appalachia ship the majority of their
coal by the Norfolk Southern and CSX rail lines, although production may also be delivered by truck
or barge, depending on the customer. ICG Natural Resources, LLC owns two idle river docks along
the Kanawha River from which ICG could ship coal to its customers.
As of March 31, 2005, these mines had 943 employees.
ICG Eastern, LLC
ICG Eastern, LLC operates the Birch River surface mine, located 60 miles east of Charleston,
near Cowen in Webster County, West Virginia. Birch River started operations in 1990 under Shell
Mining Company, was purchased by Zeigler Coal Holding Company, or Zeigler, in 1992, and was
subsequently acquired by AEI Resources, Inc. from Zeigler in 1998.
Birch River is extracting coal from five distinct coalbeds: (i) Freeport; (ii) Upper
Kittanning; (iii) Middle Kittanning; (iv) Upper Clarion and (v) Lower Clarion. Coal mined from
this operation has an average sulfur content
13
of 1.1%, an average ash content of 12.2% and an average Btu content of 12,300. ICG estimates
that Birch River controls 23.7 million tons of coal reserves.
Approximately 69% of the coal reserves are leased, while approximately 31% are owned in fee.
Most of the leased reserves are held by four lessors. The leases are retained by annual minimum
payments and by tonnage-based royalty payments. All leases can be renewed until all mineable and
merchantable coal has been exhausted.
Overburden is removed by a dragline, shovel, front-end loaders, end dumps and bulldozers.
Approximately one-third of the coal can be marketed run-of-mine, while the other two-thirds is
washed at Birch Rivers preparation plant. Coal is transported by conveyor belt from the
preparation plant to Birch Rivers rail loadout, which is served by CSX. The loadout is a batch
weigh system capable of loading unit trains in less than four hours.
The preparation plant is rated at 800 raw tons per hour. The preparation plant is comprised
of heavy media vessels, heavy media cyclones, and spirals. The plant, overland conveyor system,
and rail loadout are in excellent condition.
ICG Hazard, LLC
ICG Hazard, LLC is currently operating six surface mines, a unit train loadout (Kentucky River
Loading) and other support facilities in eastern Kentucky, near Hazard. The coal reserves and
operations were acquired in late-1997 and 1998 by AEI Resources.
ICG Hazards six surface mines include: (i) County Line; (ii) Flint Ridge; (iii) Vicco; (iv)
Rowdy Gap; (v) Tip Top; and (vi) Thunder Ridge. The coal from these mines is being extracted from
the Hazard 11, Hazard 10, Hazard 9, Hazard 8, Hazard 7 and Hazard 5A seams, and has an average
sulfur content of 1.2%, an average ash content of 12% and an average Btu content of 12,000. Nearly
all of the coal is marketed run-of-mine. ICG estimates that ICG Hazard controls 71.4 million tons
of coal reserves, plus 3.0 million tons of coal that is classified as resources. Most of the
property has been adequately explored, but additional core drilling will be conducted within
specified locations to better define the reserve base.
Approximately 99.7% of ICG Hazards reserves are leased, while 0.3% are owned in fee. Most of
the leased reserves are held by seven lessors. In several cases, ICG Hazard has multiple leases
with each lessor. The leases are retained by annual minimum payments and by tonnage-based royalty
payments. Most leases can be renewed until all mineable and merchantable coal has been exhausted.
Overburden is removed by front-end loaders, end dumps, bulldozers and blast casting. Coal is
transported from the mines to the Kentucky River Loading rail loadout by on-highway trucks. The
loadout is served by CSX, and is a batch weigh system capable of loading 120-car trains in less
than three hours. Most of the coal is transported by rail, but some coal is direct shipped to the
customer by truck from the mine pits.
An existing preparation plant structure is being extensively upgraded. It will process coal
from ICG Hazards new Flint Ridge underground mine complex. Flint Ridge will be a room and pillar
mine, producing coal from the Hazard 8 coalbed. It will utilize continuous miners and shuttle
cars. Both the plant and the underground mine are scheduled to begin operation in July 2005.
ICG Knott County, LLC
ICG Knott County, LLC operates four underground mines, the Supreme Energy preparation plant
and rail loadout and other facilities necessary to support the mining operations in eastern
Kentucky, near Kite. ICG Knott County was acquired by AEI Resources, Inc. from Zeigler in 1998.
ICG Knott County is producing coal from the Hazard 4 and the Elkhorn 3 coalbeds. Three mines
are operating in the Hazard 4 coalbed: Calvary, Clean Energy and Elk Hollow. The Classic mine is
operating in the Elkhorn 3 coalbed. The coal produced from the four mines has an average sulfur
content of 1.3%, an average ash content of 9% and an average Btu content of 12,700. ICG estimates
these properties contain 6.7 million tons of coal reserves.
14
Most of the property has been extensively explored, but additional core drilling will be
conducted within specified locations to better define the reserve base.
Approximately 86% of ICG Knott Countys reserves are owned in fee, while approximately 14% are
leased. The leases are retained by annual minimum payments and by tonnage-based royalty payments.
The leases can be renewed until all mineable and merchantable coal has been exhausted.
ICG Knott Countys four underground mines are room and pillar operations, utilizing continuous
miners and shuttle cars. Nearly all of the run-of-mine coal is processed at the Supreme Energy
preparation plant; some of the Hazard 4 run-of-mine coal is blended with the washed coal.
Nearly all of ICG Knott Countys coal is transported by rail. The loadout is a batch weigh
system that is served by CSX.
ICG East Kentucky, LLC
ICG East Kentucky, LLC is a surface mining operation located in Pike County, Kentucky, near
Phelps. ICG East Kentucky currently operates the Blackberry surface mine and the Phelps Loadout.
ICG East Kentucky was acquired by AEI Resources in the second quarter of 1999.
Blackberry is an area surface mine that produces coal from three separate coalbeds: (i)
Taylor; (ii) Fireclay; and (iii) Lower Fireclay. All of the coal is sold run-of-mine, with an
average sulfur content of 1.2%, an average ash content of 12% and an average Btu content of 12,400.
ICG estimates that the Blackberry mine controls 2.6 million tons of coal reserves; no
additional exploration is required.
After Blackberry is depleted, ICG East Kentucky will begin mining the Mount Sterling property,
which contains an additional 5.9 million tons of coal reserves. Mount Sterling is located in
Martin and Pike Counties, Kentucky near the Tug Fork River. Although Mount Sterling is expected to
be mined by ICG East Kentucky, the property is held by ICG Natural Resources, LLC. The leases are
retained by annual minimum payments and by tonnage-based royalty payments. The leases can be
renewed until all mineable and merchantable coal has been exhausted.
Overburden at the Blackberry mine is removed by front end loaders, end dumps, bull dozers and
blast casting. Coal from the pits is transported by truck to the Phelps Loadout, which is a batch
weigh system.
Illinois Basin mining operations
ICG Illinois, LLC operates one large underground coal mine, the Viper mine, in central
Illinois. Viper commenced mining operations in 1982 as a union free operation for Shell Oil
Company. Viper was acquired by Ziegler in 1992 and subsequently acquired by AEI Resources in 1998.
The Viper Mine is working the Illinois No. 5 Seam, also referred to as the Springfield Seam,
with all raw coal production washed at Vipers preparation plant. Coal mined from this operation
has an average sulfur content of 3.2%, an average ash content of 9.5% and an average Btu content of
10,500. ICG estimates that Viper controls approximately 29.6 million tons of coal reserves, plus
an additional 38.5 million resource tons. Viper has an ongoing exploration program to accurately
assess floor and roof conditions within the immediate mine plan.
Approximately two-thirds of the coal reserves are leased, while one-third is owned in fee.
The leases are retained by annual minimum payments and by tonnage-based royalty payments. The
leases can be renewed until all mineable and merchantable coal has been exhausted.
The
Viper mine is a room and pillar operation, utilizing continuous
miners and shuttle cars. Management believes that
ICG Illinois is one of the lowest cost and highest productivity mines in the Illinois Basin. All
of the
15
raw coal is processed at
Vipers preparation plant. The clean coal is transported to the customers by highway trucks. A major
rail line is located a short distance from the plant, giving Viper the option of constructing a
rail loadout.
ICG Illinois ships by independent trucking companies to utility and industrial customers
located in North Central Illinois. Shipments to electric utilities account for approximately 71%
of coal sales. Currently 1.7 million tons (80%) of ICG Illinois 2005 production is under
contract. The City of Springfield Water, Light and Power purchases nearly 50% of Vipers
production and the contract does not expire until 2020.
The preparation plant is rated at 800 raw tons per hour. It is comprised of heavy media
vessels, heavy media cyclones and spirals.
The underground equipment, infrastructure and preparation plant are well maintained. The
underground equipment will be replaced or rebuilt over the next five years.
OTHER OPERATIONS
Coal sales
In addition to the coal ICG mines, from time to time ICG also opportunistically secures coal
purchase agreements with other coal producers to take advantage of differences in market prices.
ICG ADDCAR Systems, LLC
In ICGs highwall mining business, ICG operates or leases six systems using its patented
ADDCAR highwall mining system and intends to build additional ADDCAR systems as required. The
ADDCAR highwall mining system is an innovative and efficient mining system. The system is often
deployed at reserves that cannot be economically mined by other methods.
In a typical ADDCAR highwall mining system, there is a launch vehicle, continuous miner,
conveyor cars, a stacker conveyor, electric generator, water tanker for cooling and dust
suppression and a wheel loader with forklift attachment.
A five person crew operates the entire ADDCAR highwall mining system with control of the
continuous miner being performed remotely by one person from the climate-controlled cab located at
the rear of the launch vehicle. ICGs system utilizes a navigational package to provide horizontal
guidance, which helps to control rib width and thus roof stability. Also, the system provides
vertical guidance for control out of seam dilutions. The ADDCAR highwall mining system is also
equipped with high quality video monitors to provide the operator with visual displays of the
mining process from inside each entry being mined.
The mining cycle begins by aligning the ADDCAR highwall mining system onto the desired heading
and starting the entry. As the remotely controlled continuous miner penetrates the coal seam,
ADDCAR conveyor cars are added behind it, forming a continuous cascading conveyor train. This
continues until the entry is at the planned full depths of up to 1,200 to 1,500 feet. After
retraction, the launch vehicle is moved to the next entry, leaving a support pillar of coal between
entries. This process recovers as much as 65% of the reserves while keeping all personnel outside
the coal seam in a safe working environment. A wide range of seam heights can be mined with high
production in seams as low as 3.5 feet and as high as 15 feet in a single pass. If the seam height
is greater than 15 feet, then multi lifts can be mined to create an unlimited entry height. The
navigational features on the ADDCAR highwall mining system allow for multi lift mining while
ensuring that the designed pillar width is maintained.
During the mining cycle, in addition to the tractive effort provided by the crawler drive of
the continuous miner the ADDCAR highwall mining system bolsters the cutting capability of the
machine through an additional pumping force provided by hydraulic cylinders which transmit thrust
to the back of the miner through blocks mounted on the side of the conveyor cars. This additional
energy allows the continuous miner to achieve maximum cutting and loading rates as it moves forward
into the seam.
ICG currently has the exclusive North American distribution rights for the ADDCAR highwall
mining system.
16
CUSTOMERS AND COAL CONTRACTS
Customers
ICGs primary customers are investment grade electric utility companies primarily in the
eastern half of the United States. The majority of ICGs customers purchase coal for terms of one
year or longer, but ICG also supplies coal on a spot basis for some of its customers. ICGs three
largest customers for the three months ended March 31, 2005, were Georgia Power Company, Carolina
Power & Light Company and Duke Power and ICG derived approximately 63% of ICGs coal revenues from
sales to its five largest customers.
Long-term coal supply agreements
As is customary in the coal industry, ICG enters into long-term supply contracts (exceeding
one year in duration) with many of its customers when market conditions are appropriate. These
contracts allow customers to secure a supply for their future needs and provides ICG with greater
predictability of sales volume and sales price. For the three months ended March 31, 2005,
approximately 67% of ICGs revenues were derived from long-term supply contracts. ICG sells the
remainder of ICGs coal through short-term contracts and on the spot market. ICG has also entered
into certain brokered transactions to purchase certain amounts of coal to meet ICGs sales
commitments. The purchase coal contracts expire at the end of 2006 and provide ICG a minimum of
approximately 4.6 million tons of coal through the remaining lives of the contracts.
As a result of the Horizon bankruptcy process, ICG was able to renegotiate certain contracts
at significantly higher prices that reflected the current pricing environment and not purchase
unfavorable contracts. As the net costs associated with producing coal have risen, such as higher
energy, transportation and steel prices, the price adjustments within several of ICGs long-term
contracts have not caught up to the new coal prices. This has resulted in certain counterparties
to these contracts benefiting from below market prices for ICGs coal.
The terms of ICGs coal supply agreements result from competitive bidding and extensive
negotiations with customers. Consequently, the terms of these contracts vary significantly by
customer, including price adjustment features, price reopener terms, coal quality requirements,
quantity parameters, permitted sources of supply, future regulatory changes, extension options,
force majeure provisions and termination and assignment provisions.
Some of ICGs long-term contracts provide for a pre-determined adjustment to the stipulated
base price at times specified in the agreement or at other periodic intervals to account for
changes due to inflation or deflation. In addition, most of ICGs contracts contain provisions to
adjust the base price due to new statutes, ordinances or regulations that impact ICGs costs
related to performance of the agreement. Also, some of ICGs contracts contain provisions that
allow for the recovery of costs impacted by modifications or changes in the interpretations or
application of any applicable government statutes.
Price reopener provisions are present in most of ICGs long-term contracts. These price
reopener provisions may automatically set a new price based on prevailing market price or, in some
instances, require the parties to agree on a new price, sometimes between a specified range of
prices. In a limited number of agreements, failure of the parties to agree on a price under a
price reopener provision can lead to termination of the contract. Under some of ICGs contracts,
ICG has the right to match lower prices offered to ICGs customers by other suppliers. These price
reopener provisions have enabled ICG to negotiate higher selling prices in several contracts over
the last several months.
Quality and volumes for the coal are stipulated in coal supply agreements, and in some
instances buyers have the option to vary annual or monthly volumes. Most of ICGs coal supply
agreements contain provisions requiring ICG to deliver coal within certain ranges for specific coal
characteristics such as heat content, sulfur, ash, hardness and ash fusion temperature. Failure to
meet these specifications can result in economic penalties, suspension or cancellation of shipments
or termination of the contracts. Assuming steady or increasing coal prices over the near-term, ICG
expect to renew many of ICGs expiring sales contracts at significantly higher prices.
17
Transportation/logistics
ICG ships coal to its customers by rail, truck or barge. ICG typically pays the
transportation costs for its coal to be delivered to the barge or rail loadout facility, where the
coal is then loaded for final delivery. Once the coal is loaded in the barge or railcar, ICGs
customer is typically responsible for the freight costs to the ultimate destination.
Transportation costs vary greatly based on the customers proximity to the mine and ICGs proximity
to the loadout facilities. ICG uses a variety of independent companies for its transportation
needs and typically enter into multiple non-contract agreements with trucking companies throughout
the year.
In 2004, approximately 94% of ICGs coal from ICGs Central Appalachian operations was
delivered to its customers by rail on either the Norfolk Southern or CSX rail lines, with the
remaining 6% delivered by truck. For ICGs Illinois Basin operations, 100% of ICGs coal was
delivered by truck to customers, generally within an 80 mile radius of ICGs Illinois mine.
ICG believes it enjoys good relationships with rail carriers and barge companies due, in part,
to its modern coal-loading facilities and the experience of its transportation and distribution
employees.
SUPPLIERS
ICG has historically spent more than $150 million per year to procure goods and services in
support of its business activities, excluding capital expenditures. Principal commodities include
maintenance and repair parts and services, electricity, fuel, roof control and support items,
explosives, tires, conveyance structure, ventilation supplies and lubricants. ICG uses suppliers
for a significant portion of ICGs equipment rebuilds and repairs both on- and off-site, as well as
construction and reclamation activities.
Each of ICGs regional mining operations has developed its own supplier base consistent with
local needs. ICG has a centralized sourcing group for major supplier contract negotiation and
administration, for the negotiation and purchase of major capital goods and to support the business
units. The supplier base has been relatively stable for many years, but there has been some
consolidation. ICG is not dependent on any one supplier in any region. ICG promotes competition
between suppliers and seek to develop relationships with those suppliers whose focus is on lowering
its costs. ICG seeks suppliers who identify and concentrate on implementing continuous improvement
opportunities within their area of expertise.
COMPETITION
The coal industry is intensely competitive. ICGs main competitors are Massey Energy Company
and Alpha Natural Resources. As we develop additional reserves and expand our operations into
Central and Northern West Virginia, we will face additional competition from Northern Appalachia
coal producers, including Consol Energy and Foundation Coal Holdings. The most important factors
on which ICG competes are coal price at the mine, coal quality and characteristics, transportation
costs and the reliability of supply. Demand for coal and the prices that ICG will be able to
obtain for its coal are closely linked to coal consumption patterns of the domestic electric
generation industry which has accounted for approximately 92% of domestic coal consumption in
recent years. These coal consumption patterns are influenced by factors beyond ICGs control,
including the demand for electricity which is significantly dependent upon economic activity and
summer and winter temperatures in the United States, government regulation, technological
developments and the location, availability, quality and price of competing sources of coal,
alternative fuels such as natural gas, oil and nuclear and alternative energy sources such as
hydroelectric power.
EMPLOYEES
As of March 31, 2005, ICG had 1,388 employees of which 20% were salaried and 80% were hourly.
ICG believes its relationship with its employees is good. All of ICGs workforce is union free.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, ICG is involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. ICG believes it has recorded adequate reserves for these liabilities and that there is
no individual case or group of related cases pending that is likely to have a material adverse
effect on ICGs financial condition, results of operations or
18
cash flows. With respect to any claims relating to Horizon which arose prior to November 12,
2002, such claims are subject to an automatic stay of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In limited
circumstances, the Bankruptcy Court has lifted the stay but only to the extent of insurance
coverage relating to Horizon. In any event, ICG believes all or substantially all of the claims
will be resolved in accordance with Horizons plan of reorganization.
EQUIPMENT AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
As of December 31, 2004, ICGs leased equipment was, on average, 8.5 years old. ICG believes
that a significant portion of its equipment needs to be upgraded in the near-term. Accordingly,
ICG expects to retire much of its current equipment and invest approximately $176 million in new
equipment and for mining development operations in the next two years. ICG believes ICGs capital
investment plan will provide it with a cost-effective fleet of equipment and enable it to improve
ICG production efficiencies. As we take advantage of planned expansion opportunities from 2007
through 2009, we expect to spend approximately $204 million in capital expenditures, which may
require external financing.
While ICG currently operates its mines with a high percentage of leased equipment due
primarily to Horizons preference for leasing, ICG will be purchasing equipment in the future.
Current equipment is leased primarily from Caterpillar Finance, GE Capital and other leasing
companies. ICGs operating leases typically have a term of three to five years, with ICG having
the right to purchase the equipment at the end of the lease at fair market value.
RECLAMATION
Reclamation expenses are a significant part of any coal mining operation. Prior to commencing
mining operations, a company is required to apply for numerous ICG permits in the state where the
mining is to occur. Before a state will approve and issue these permits, it typically requires the
mine operator to present a reclamation plan which meets regulatory criteria and to secure a surety
bond to guarantee performance of reclamation in an amount determined under state law. These
bonding companies, in turn, require that ICG backstop the surety bonds with cash and/or letters of
credit. While bonds are issued against reclamation liability for a particular permit at a
particular site, collateral posted in support of the bond is not allocated to a specific bond, but
instead is part of a collateral pool supporting all bonds issued by that particular insurer. Bonds
are released in phases as reclamation is completed in a particular area.
19
MANAGEMENT
The Board of Directors and executive officers of ICG and International Coal Group are
identical. For a description of the Board of Directors and executive officers of International
Coal Group, see Management beginning on page 111 of the public offering preliminary prospectus.
THE REORGANIZATION
The reorganization is being completed to facilitate the acquisitions of Anker and CoalQuest,
on a tax-deferred basis. The reorganization will be tax-free for ICG shareholders. The following
discussion contains material information pertaining to the reorganization. This discussion is
subject, and qualified in its entirety by reference, to the Anker business combination agreement
filed as an exhibit to the registration statement relating to the public offering, which contains
the material provisions relating to the reorganization. International Coal Group encourages you to
read and review the Anker business combination agreement as well as the discussion in this
prospectus. The business combination agreement relating to the CoalQuest acquisition is unrelated
to the reorganization.
GENERAL
The next section of this document, The Business Combination Agreement, has additional and
more detailed information regarding the legal documents that govern the reorganization, including
information about the conditions to completion of the reorganization and the provisions for
terminating or amending the Anker business combination agreement.
BACKGROUND AND REASONS OF THE REORGANIZATION
ICG was formed by WLR and other investors in May 2004 to acquire and operate competitive coal
mining facilities. Through the acquisition of certain key assets from the bankruptcy estate of
Horizon, ICG was able to acquire high quality reserves located in Appalachia and the Illinois Basin
that are union free, have limited reclamation liabilities and are substantially free of other
legacy liabilities. Consistent with the WLR investor groups strategy to consolidate profitable
coal assets, ICG began discussions in December 2004 with Anker and CoalQuest regarding possible
strategic transactions.
Throughout these discussions, representatives of Anker and CoalQuest made it clear to ICG that
the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions must be accomplished on a tax-deferred basis so that the
shareholders of Anker and the members of CoalQuest would not, as a general rule, recognize
immediate taxable gain on the exchange of their Anker or CoalQuest equity for ICG equity. In order
to accomplish this objective, the parties advisors determined that the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions should be structured as elements of a Section 351 transaction in which the equity of
Anker, CoalQuest and ICG was contributed (by merger or otherwise) to a new holding company in
exchange for holding company stock. International Coal Group was created to serve as the holding
company in the Section 351 transaction.
Since ICG, Inc. shares were held by more than 100 shareholders, ICG, Inc. determined that the
only practical way to accomplish the contribution of ICGs equity to International Coal Group was
by merging ICG, Inc. into a subsidiary, which had been formed as a subsidiary of ICG, Inc. As a
result of this merger, which we refer to as the reorganization, each ICG common share will be
exchanged for one International Coal Group common share on a tax-free basis. The mechanics of the
reorganization were included in the Anker business combination agreement, which was approved by the
Board of Directors of ICG and executed by all parties on March 31, 2005.
APPROVALS OF THE REORGANIZATION
At a meeting on March 31, 2005, the ICG board of directors, based on a recommendation of a
special directorate committee of the board, unanimously approved the Anker business combination
agreement and the CoalQuest business combination agreement and the transactions contemplated by
each agreement, including the reorganization.
The reorganization is subject to the approval of the holders of a majority of all issued and
outstanding ICG common shares. The holders of a majority of the outstanding ICG common shares as
of the record date of March
20
31, 2005 have delivered irrevocable proxies authorizing ICG to vote their shares in favor of
the adoption of the Anker business combination agreement and the transactions contemplated by it,
including the reorganization. Directors, officers and/or their affiliates granted proxies with
respect to 28.6% of the outstanding shares. The Anker business combination will be approved by
written consent of the shareholders pursuant to the proxies granted by the majority of
shareholders. ICG will not hold a meeting of shareholders. No other action on the part of any
shareholder of ICG is required for the reorganization to be completed and, therefore, we are not
soliciting your vote.
The HSR Act and the rules and regulations thereunder provide that certain merger transactions,
including the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions, may not be consummated until required information
and materials have been furnished to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission,
and certain waiting periods have expired or been terminated. ICG filed with the FTC and the DOJ
notification and report forms under the HSR Act on April 16, and April 15 and April 29, 2005. On
April 19, 2005, ICG was notified that it received early termination of the applicable waiting
period under the HSR Act.
PROCEDURES FOR EXCHANGE OF SHARES
You do not need to send your ICG stock certificates to us. Your current ICG common stock
certificates will represent shares of International Coal Group following the reorganization.
DIVIDEND POLICY
See Dividend policy on page 37 of the public offering preliminary prospectus.
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following summary discusses the material United States federal income tax consequences to
certain United States Holders (as defined below) of ICG common shares as a result of the
reorganization. This summary does not deal with holders of ICG common shares who do not hold
their ICG common shares as capital assets or who are subject to special treatment under United
States federal income tax laws. For example, the summary does not address tax consequences to:
|
|
|
|
|
non-United States persons; |
|
|
|
|
holders who may be subject to
special tax treatment, such as dealers
in securities or currencies, financial
institutions, tax-exempt entities,
traders in securities that elect to
use a mark-to-market method of
accounting for their securities
holdings or insurance companies; |
|
|
|
|
holders who acquired their ICG
common shares pursuant to the exercise
of employee stock options or warrants
or otherwise as compensation; |
|
|
|
|
persons holding ICG common
shares as part of a hedge,
constructive sale, integrated or
conversion transaction or a straddle; |
|
|
|
|
holders of outstanding
warrants or options to acquire ICG
common shares; or |
|
|
|
|
holders whose functional
currency is not the United States
dollar. |
The summary also does not address alternative minimum tax consequences or estate or gift tax
consequences, if any, or any state, local or foreign tax consequences. If a partnership holds ICG
common shares, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a partnership holding ICG common shares,
you should consult your tax advisor.
United States Holder means a beneficial owner of ICG common shares that is for United States
federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the
United States; |
|
|
|
|
|
a corporation, or a
partnership or other entity that is
treated as a corporation, created or
organized under the laws of the United
States or any political subdivision of
the United States; |
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an estate the income of which
is subject to United States federal
income taxation regardless of its
source; or |
|
|
|
|
|
a trust if (1) it is subject
to the primary supervision of a court
within the United States and one or
more United States persons have the
authority to control all substantial
decisions of the trust or (2) it has a
valid election in effect under
applicable United States Treasury
regulations to be treated as a United
States person. |
The summary is based on the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions as of the date hereof. Any of these
authorities may be changed, possibly retroactively, so as to result in United States federal income
tax consequences different from those discussed below.
This summary is for general information only and is not tax advice. There can be no assurance
that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or the courts will agree with the statements and
conclusions in the summary. Accordingly, all holders of Equity Interests are urged to consult
their own tax advisors concerning the specific United States federal income tax consequences to
them of the transaction and any consequences arising under any other tax laws, including the laws
of any state, local, foreign or other taxing jurisdiction.
The reorganization is intended to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section
368(a) of the Code and/or as transfers of property described in Section 351(a) of the Code to
International Coal Group by holders of ICG common shares. It is a condition to the obligation of
ICG to consummate the reorganization that ICG receive an opinion of its counsel that (1) the
reorganization will be treated either (i) as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)
of the Code, to which ICG and International Coal Group are parties within the meaning of Section
368(b) of the Code, or (ii) as transfers of property to International Coal Group by the ICG common
shareholders as transferors, described in Section 351(a) of the Code, and (2) the stockholders of
ICG (other than stockholders that may be subject to special rules) will not recognize gain or loss
on the exchange of their ICG common shares solely for International Coal Group common shares.
ICG has received such an opinion of its counsel, based upon, and subject to, certain
assumptions, limitations and qualifications, including certain representations made by the
management of ICG and International Coal Group, among others, and the assumption that all such
representations are and will remain true and complete as of the time of each and every one of the
reorganization, the Anker acquisition, the CoalQuest acquisition and the proposed public offering.
If any such representations or assumptions are inconsistent with the facts, the U.S. federal income
tax consequences of the transaction, as set forth in the opinion and as described below, could be
adversely affected.
Assuming that the reorganization qualifies as a reorganization described in Section 368(a) of
the Code and/or as transfers of property to International Coal Group by the ICG common
shareholders, as transferors, described in Section 351(a) of the Code, you will not recognize gain or loss on the exchange of your ICG
common shares solely for International Coal Group common stock pursuant to the reorganization.
Your tax basis in the International Coal Group common shares received in exchange for your ICG
common shares will be the same as your basis in the ICG common shares exchanged for the
International Coal Group common shares Your holding period for the International Coal Group common
shares received in exchange for your ICG common shares will include the period for which you held
the ICG common shares exchanged for the International Coal Group common shares.
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
Under Section 262 of the DGCL, record holders of shares of ICG common shares are entitled to
appraisal rights in connection with the reorganization. The following summary of the provisions of
Section 262 of the DGCL is not a complete statement of the provisions of that section and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Section 262 of the DGCL, a copy of which
is attached to this document as Annex B and is incorporated into this summary by reference.
Failure to comply with the procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL in a timely and proper
manner, will result in the loss of appraisal rights.
ICG shareholders wishing to exercise the right to dissent from the reorganization and seek an
appraisal of their shares must:
|
|
|
|
|
NOT have voted in favor of the
Anker business combination agreement
or have voted AGAINST the Anker
business combination agreement or
ABSTAINED if voting by proxy; |
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
file written notice with ICG
of an intention to exercise rights of
appraisal of its shares within 20 days
of the date of mailing of a notice of
the written consent approving the
Anker business combination agreement;
and |
|
|
|
|
|
follow the procedures set
forth in Section 262. |
An ICG shareholder who elects to exercise appraisal rights under Section 262 should mail or
deliver a written demand to: Corporate Secretary, International Coal Group, Inc., 2000 Ashland
Drive, Ashland, Kentucky 41101.
The fair value of ICG common shares will be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery. The
appraised value of the shares will not include any value arising from the reorganization. The ICG
common shares with respect to which holders have perfected their appraisal rights in accordance
with Section 262 and have not effectively withdrawn or lost their appraisal rights are referred to
in this document as the dissenting shares.
Within ten days after the effective date of the reorganization, International Coal Group must
mail a notice to all shareholders who filed a written notice of their intention to exercise
appraisal rights in compliance with Section 262 notifying those shareholders of the effective date
of the reorganization. Within 120 days after the effective date of the reorganization, holders of
the dissenting shares may file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery for the appraisal of
their shares, although they may, within 60 days after the effective date, withdraw their demand for
appraisal. Within 120 days after the effective date of the reorganization, the holders of
dissenting shares may also, upon written request, receive from International Coal Group a statement
setting forth the aggregate number of shares with respect to which demands for appraisal have been
received.
Appraisal rights are available only to the record holders of shares. If you wish to exercise
appraisal rights but have a beneficial interest in shares held of record by or in the name of
another person, such as a broker, bank or nominee, you should act promptly to cause the record
holder to follow the procedures set forth in Section 262 to perfect your appraisal rights.
Dissenting shares lose their status as dissenting shares if:
|
|
|
|
|
the reorganization is abandoned; |
|
|
|
|
|
the dissenting shareholder
fails to make a timely written demand
for appraisal; |
|
|
|
|
|
neither International Coal
Group, as the case may be, nor the
shareholder files a complaint or
petition in the Delaware Court of
Chancery demanding a determination of
the value of the stock within 120 days
after the effective date of the
reorganization; or |
|
|
|
|
|
the shareholder delivers to
International Coal Group, within 60
days of the effective date of the
reorganization, or thereafter with the
approval of International Coal Group,
a written withdrawal of the
shareholders demand for appraisal of
the dissenting shares, although no
appraisal proceeding in the Delaware
Court of Chancery may be dismissed as
to any shareholder without the
approval of the court. |
Failure to follow the procedures required by Section 262 of the DGCL for perfecting appraisal
rights may result in the loss of appraisal rights. If an ICG shareholder withdraws his or her
demand for appraisal or has his or her appraisal rights terminated as described above, that
shareholder will only be entitled to receive the consideration for those shares pursuant to the
terms of the Anker business combination agreement.
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
For accounting purposes, our reorganization will be accounted for as a transfer of assets and
exchange of shares between entities under common control. As such, the transaction will be
accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling-of-interests. Accordingly, the financial position
and results of operations of ICG will be included in our consolidated financial statements on a
historical cost basis.
23
THE BUSINESS COMBINATION AGREEMENT
The following describes certain aspects of the reorganization, including material provisions
of the Anker business combination agreement as such agreement relates to the reorganization. This
description of the Anker business combination agreement is subject to, and qualified in its
entirety by reference to, the Anker business combination agreement, which has been filed as an
exhibit to the registration statement relating to the public offering. We urge you to read the
Anker business combination agreement carefully and in its entirety. We expect the CoalQuest
acquisition to occur concurrently with the Anker acquisition.
OVERVIEW
On March 31, 2005, ICG entered into a business combination agreement with Anker, International
Coal Group, ICG Merger Sub, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of ICG, and Anker Merger Sub,
Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of ICG.
The Anker business combination agreement contains the operative provisions with regard to both
the Anker merger and our corporate reorganization. The following description describes the
relevant provisions of the Anker business combination agreement to the extent they apply to the
reorganization.
EFFECTIVE TIME OF THE REORGANIZATION
The ICG reorganization and the Anker acquisition will become effective upon the filing of
certificates of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware or at such later time
as may be agreed upon by ICG and Anker and as specified in the certificates of merger. The filing
of the certificates of merger will occur as soon as practicable after the conditions to completion
of the mergers have been satisfied or waived.
CONSIDERATION TO BE RECEIVED IN THE REORGANIZATION
The ICG shareholders will receive one International Coal Group common share for each ICG
common share.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The Anker business combination agreement contains customary representations and warranties of
ICG and Anker relating to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate organization and
similar corporate matters; |
|
|
|
|
|
capitalization; |
|
|
|
|
|
authorization, execution,
delivery, performance and
enforceability of, and required
consents, approvals, orders and
authorizations of governmental
entities relating to, the Anker
business combination agreement and
related matters; |
|
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws; |
|
|
|
|
|
legal proceedings; |
|
|
|
|
|
title, ownership and use of
personal, including intellectual
property, and real property; |
|
|
|
|
|
certain material contracts; |
|
|
|
|
|
operational and
non-operational permits and licenses
with governmental authorities; |
|
|
|
|
|
matters relating to labor
relations and employee benefits; |
|
|
|
|
|
payment of brokerage and
finders fees or commissions; |
|
|
|
|
|
environmental matters; |
|
|
|
|
|
financial statements and
absence of material liabilities since
December 31, 2004; |
|
|
|
|
|
insurance; |
24
|
|
|
|
|
affiliate transactions; |
|
|
|
|
|
filing of tax returns, payment
of taxes and other tax matters; and |
|
|
|
|
|
indebtedness and
distributions. |
|
|
|
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGERS
Under the Anker business combination agreement, each of ICG and Anker has agreed that, from
the date of the Anker business combination agreement until the completion of the mergers, each
party will, and will cause each of their respective subsidiaries to, conduct its businesses in the
ordinary course consistent with past practice and use its reasonable best efforts to preserve
intact its business organizations and relationships with third parties and keep available the
services of its present officers and employees. In addition, each of ICG and Anker has agreed
that, subject to certain exceptions, without the other partys consent it will not and will not
permit any of its respective subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
adopt or propose any change in
its certificate of incorporation,
bylaws or other constituent documents; |
|
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with any
other person or acquire a material
amount of assets from any other
person; |
|
|
|
|
|
sell, lease, license or
otherwise dispose of any assets or
property with a value in excess of
$25,000 except (i) pursuant to
existing contracts or commitments or
(ii) otherwise in the ordinary course
consistent with past practice; |
|
|
|
|
|
pay or undertake to pay any
increase in salaries or other
compensation of, or to pay any bonuses
to, any director or officer, or,
except in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past
practice, any employee, or enter into
any employment, severance or similar
agreement with any director, officer
or employee; |
|
|
|
|
|
adopt or increase any benefits
under any profit sharing, bonus or
deferred compensation, savings,
insurance, pension, retirement or
other employee plan for or with any of
its employees;
|
|
|
|
|
|
incur, assume or guarantee any
indebtedness, except for indebtedness
incurred, assumed or guaranteed in the
ordinary course of business consistent
(with respect to amount and other
terms) with past practice; |
|
|
|
|
|
cancel any material debt or
claim owed to it or its subsidiaries
or waive any right of material value
owned by it or its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
|
repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire directly or
indirectly, any of the outstanding
common shares of it or other
securities of, or other ownership
interests in, it or its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
|
make any change in accounting
methods or practices, except as
required by law or generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
|
|
|
issue or sell any additional shares or other equity interests or
make any other changes in its capital
structure, except (i) grants or
issuances of options or stock pursuant
to agreements in effect on the date of
the agreement or (ii) pursuant to the
exercise of options or stock-based
awards of that party or its
subsidiaries, in each case,
outstanding as of the date of the
agreement or issued thereafter in
compliance with the agreement; |
|
|
|
|
|
write off as uncollectible any
notes or accounts receivable, except
write-offs in the ordinary course of
business charged to applicable
reserves, none of which individually
or in the aggregate is material, or
alter customary time periods for
collection of accounts receivable or
payments of accounts payable; |
|
|
|
|
|
permit to be incurred any lien
(other than a permitted lien) on any
of its real property or real property
interests or, except in the ordinary
course of business consistent with
past practice, on any of its personal
property; |
|
|
|
|
|
make any loan, advance or
capital contributions to or investment
in any person other than a wholly
owned subsidiary in an aggregate
amount in excess of $25,000; |
25
|
|
|
|
|
enter into any warranty,
guaranty or other similar undertaking
with respect to a contractual
performance extended by that |
|
|
|
|
|
party or any of its subsidiaries other
than in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past
practice; |
|
|
|
|
|
modify, terminate or enter
into any contracts or commitments with
respect to which the aggregate amount
that could reasonably be expected to
be paid or received thereunder exceeds
$25,000 individually or $100,000 in
the aggregate, except contracts and
commitments (for capital expenditures
or otherwise) in the ordinary course
of business and not knowingly
inconsistent with that partys
business and operating plan and budget
as in effect on the date hereof; |
|
|
|
|
|
take any action that could
reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on that party; |
|
|
|
|
|
modify or amend any lease or
cause or permit any lien to exist on
any real property owned, leased or
occupied by it that is not a permitted
lien; or |
|
|
|
|
|
agree or commit to do any of
the foregoing. |
REASONABLE BEST EFFORTS; OTHER AGREEMENTS
Each of ICG, International Coal Group and Anker has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts
to:
|
|
|
|
|
take all actions necessary or
desirable under applicable laws and
regulations to consummate the
transactions contemplated by the Anker
business combination agreement; |
|
|
|
|
|
obtain any consents, approvals
or waivers under any contracts of
those parties; and |
|
|
|
|
|
take actions or make filings
to obtain, and cooperate with the
other party to obtain, the consent,
approval or waiver of any governmental
authority required to consummate the
transactions contemplated by the Anker
business combination agreement. |
International Coal Group has agreed to enter into registration rights agreements with existing
ICG shareholders who currently have registration rights under agreements with ICG, with the new
rights being granted pursuant to substantially similar agreements with International Coal Group
covering the International Coal Group common stock issued to those shareholders in exchange for
their ICG common stock.
CONDITIONS TO COMPLETION OF THE REORGANIZATION AND ACQUISITION
Each partys obligation to effect the reorganization and acquisition was subject to the
satisfaction of various conditions, all of which have been satisfied with the exception of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
no order, injunction or decree
preventing the completion of the
mergers being in effect, and no laws
having been enacted or promulgated by
any governmental authority having the
effect of prohibiting the mergers or
making them illegal; and |
|
|
|
|
|
delivery of certificates of
merger and other customary closing
documents. |
|
|
|
In addition, each partys obligation to effect the reorganization is subject to the
effectiveness of the International Coal Group registration statement of which this prospectus is a
part having been declared effective.
TERMINATION
The Anker business combination agreement may be terminated at any time before the completion
of the mergers:
|
|
|
|
|
By mutual written consent of
ICG and Anker; |
|
|
|
|
|
By Anker or ICG after April
15, 2006, if the mergers have not been
completed by that date, as long as the
party terminating the agreement is not
in default under the agreement; |
|
|
|
|
|
As long as the terminating
party is not otherwise in default or
breach of the agreement, and has not
failed or refused to close without
justification, by ICG or Anker,
without prejudice to other rights and
remedies that |
26
|
|
|
|
|
the terminating party
may have, if any other party (i) has
materially failed to perform its
covenants or agreements required to be
performed on or prior to the
completion of the mergers or (ii) has
materially breached any of its
representations or warranties in the
agreement; except that the defaulting
party will have 20 business days
following written notice from a
non-defaulting party to cure any
breach, if it is curable; |
|
|
|
|
|
By ICG or Anker, if (A) any
competent governmental authority has
issued an order that has become final
and nonappealable or (B) any law is in
effect, in either case restricting,
restraining or altering in a material
manner or enjoining or otherwise
prohibiting or making illegal the
effectuation of the transactions
contemplated by the agreement; or |
|
|
|
|
|
By ICG or Anker, if the
CoalQuest business combination
agreement is terminated. |
EXPENSES
All costs and expenses incurred by ICG, Anker and CoalQuest in connection with the Anker
business combination agreement will be paid by the party incurring those costs or expenses.
INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
The Anker business combination agreement provides that for six years from the effective date
of the Anker and ICG mergers, International Coal Group will indemnify and hold harmless all past
and present directors and officers of Anker, ICG and their respective subsidiaries, to the same
extent those persons are indemnified as of the date of the agreement by Anker, ICG or their
subsidiaries, as the case may be, pursuant to their certificates of incorporation, bylaws or other
constituent documents, as in existence on the date of the Anker business combination agreement, for
acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the completion of the mergers. International Coal Group
will cause Anker and ICG to provide, for an aggregate period of not less than six years from the
completion of the mergers, each current director and officer of Anker, ICG and their subsidiaries,
as the case may be, an insurance and indemnification policy that provides coverage for events
occurring prior to the completion of the mergers that is no less favorable than the existing policy
or policies or, if substantially equivalent insurance coverage is unavailable, the best available
coverage; except that neither Anker nor ICG will not be required to pay a premium for the required
insurance in excess of 400% of the premium paid by it currently.
AMENDMENTS AND WAIVERS
Any provision of the Anker business combination agreement may be amended or waived by the
parties to the agreement, except that, in the case of either ICG or Anker, the amendment or waiver
must have been approved by the special committee of the Board of Directors of that party.
GOVERNING LAW
The Anker business combination agreement is governed by and will be construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Delaware.
27
DESCRIPTION OF INTERNATIONAL COAL GROUP CAPITAL STOCK
For a description of International Coal Group capital stock, see Description of capital
stock beginning on page 125 of the public offering preliminary prospectus.
COMPARISON OF SHAREHOLDERS RIGHTS
The rights of the shareholders in ICG will remain virtually unchanged as a result of the
reorganization. The certificate of incorporation of International Coal Group contains certain
provisions that will apply only until a public offering is consummated. Upon a public offering,
different provisions become operative. The certificate of incorporation defines a public offering
as any firm commitment, underwritten public offering. The provisions currently applicable to ICG
shareholders are identical to the current provisions contained in the International Coal Group
certificate of incorporation. As such, the following table compares the relative rights of
International Coal Group shareholders before and after a public offering.
The following summary does not purport to be a complete statement of the rights of holders of
ICG shareholders and International Coal Group shareholders. You should also refer to the DGCL and
the certificates of incorporation and bylaws of ICG and International Coal Group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Public Offering |
|
|
Post-Public Offering |
|
|
Article/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section |
|
|
|
|
|
Article/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Nos. |
|
|
Summary Comparison |
|
|
Section Nos. |
|
|
Summary Comparison |
|
|
Authorized Capital Stock |
|
|
Art. IV
Sec.. 1-
|
|
|
2.0 billion shares authorized; 1.8
billion of common stock; 200 million of
preferred stock
|
|
|
Art. IV,
Sec. 1
|
|
|
2.2 billion shares
authorized; 2.0 billion
of common stock; 200
million of preferred
stock |
|
|
Preemptive Rights |
|
Art IV,
Sec. 4
|
|
|
Grants preemptive rights to founding
shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable provision |
|
|
Transfer Restriction |
|
|
Art IV,
Sec. 5
|
|
|
Creates restrictions on transfer based
on the number of record holders of
common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable provision |
|
|
Drag-Along Rights |
|
|
Art. IV
Sec. 6
|
|
|
Grants drag-along rights to Shareholders
holding no less than 2/3 of the stock to
force other Shareholders to sell shares
in a transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable provision |
|
|
Super Majority Voting
Provisions |
|
|
Art, VI, Sec. 1
|
|
|
Grants veto right to WLR and a
Majority in Interest with regard to
certain corporate actions
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable
provision |
|
|
Art. VI Sec. 2
|
|
|
Grants veto right to the Board and the
Founding Shareholders with regard to
certain corporate actions
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable
provision |
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Public Offering |
|
|
Post-Public Offering |
|
|
Article/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section |
|
|
|
|
|
Article/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Nos. |
|
|
Summary Comparison |
|
|
Section Nos. |
|
|
Summary Comparison |
|
|
Art. VI Sec. 3
|
|
|
Grants veto right to the Board, a
Majority in Interest and WLR with
respect to certain corporate actions
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable
provision |
|
|
Amendment to Bylaws |
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable provision
|
|
|
Art. V
|
|
|
Provides that the Board
may amend bylaws.
Holders of at least 80%
of voting stock may
also amend the bylaws |
|
|
Classified Board |
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable provision
|
|
|
Art. VII, Sec. 1
|
|
|
Provides for the
creation of a
classified Board
consisting of three
classes of directors
divided as equally as
possible with the first
class to come up for
election at the annual
meeting in 2006, the
second in 2007 and the
third in 2008 |
|
|
Shareholder Director
Nominations |
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable provision
|
|
|
Art. VII, Sec. 2
|
|
|
Requires advance notice
to the Company of
director nominations by
shareholders |
|
|
Removal of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable provision
|
|
|
Art. VI, Sec. 3
|
|
|
Provides for removal of
directors for cause |
|
|
Certain Amendments |
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable provision
|
|
|
Art. VII, Sec. 4
|
|
|
Provides that 80% of
voting stock must
approve any amendment
to Article VII |
|
|
Amendment to Charter |
|
|
Art. IX
|
|
|
Allows amendments to charter only with
consent of WLR and a Majority in
Interest plus the affirmative vote of a
majority of capital stock
|
|
|
Art. XII
|
|
|
International Coal
Group has the right to
amend the Charter |
|
|
Information Rights |
|
|
Art. XI, Sec. 1
|
|
|
Grants information rights to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable provision |
|
|
Confidentiality |
|
|
Art. XI, Sec. 2
|
|
|
Provides confidentiality agreement
between founding shareholders and ICG
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comparable provision |
|
|
29
COMPARATIVE MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
ICG currently owns all of the outstanding International Coal Group common shares and,
therefore, there is no public market for International Coal Groups common shares. The ICG common
shares are currently reported on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service. No comparative
market price data is presented because such information would not be meaningful. For information
regarding the high and low quotes ICG common shares since November 15, 2004, see Price range of
ICG, Inc. common stock on page 36 of the public offering preliminary prospectus.
For a description of International Coal Groups dividend policy, see Dividend policy on page
37 of the public offering preliminary prospectus.
30
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table and accompanying footnotes show information regarding the beneficial
ownership of ICG common stock before and after the reorganization and the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person who is known by
ICG to own beneficially more than 5%
its common shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
each member of ICG board of
directors and each of ICGs named
executive officers; and |
|
|
|
|
|
all members of ICGs board of
directors and ICGs executive officers
as a group. |
ICG has determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. ICG believes that each shareholder named in the table has sole voting and
dispositive power for the shares shown as beneficially owned by each such shareholder.
The number of ICG common shares and percentages of beneficial ownership before the
reorganization set forth below are based on 106,605,999 shares of ICG common stock issued and
outstanding as of May 31, 2005. The number of International Coal Group common shares and
percentages of beneficial ownership after the reorganization are based on a one-to-one exchange
ratio for shares of ICG and International Coal Group and includes 30,950,129 International Coal
Group common shares to be issued to holders of Anker shares and CoalQuest membership interests, the
maximum number of shares to be issued.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Coal Group Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned After the |
|
|
|
ICG Shares Beneficially Owned |
|
|
Reorganization and the Anker and |
|
|
|
Prior to the Reorganization |
|
|
CoalQuest Acquisitions |
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Percent |
|
Värde Partners, Inc1
Värde Management, Inc.
Värde Management International, Inc.
Attn: Kathy Ricke
8500 Normandale Lake Boulevard
Suite 1570
Minneapolis, MN 55347 |
|
|
9,868,755 |
|
|
|
9.26 |
% |
|
|
9,868,755 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contrarian Funds LLC
Attn: Michael J. Restifo
411 West Putnam Avenue, Suite 225
Greenwich, CT 06830 |
|
|
10,822,865 |
|
|
|
10.15 |
% |
|
|
10,822,865 |
|
|
|
7.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WLR Recovery Fund II, L.P
Attn: Wendy Teramoto
101 East 52nd Street, 19th Floor
New York, NY 10022 |
|
|
9,804,172 |
2 |
|
|
9.20 |
% |
|
|
24,095,883 |
3 |
|
|
17.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shepherd International Coal Holdings
Inc.
Attn: Colin M. Lancaster
3600 S. Lake Drive
St. Francis, WI 53235 |
|
|
7,670,349 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
% |
|
|
7,670,349 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Coal Group Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned After the |
|
|
|
ICG Shares Beneficially Owned |
|
|
Reorganization and the Anker and |
|
|
|
Prior to the Reorganization |
|
|
CoalQuest Acquisitions |
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Percent |
|
Stark Trading
Attn: Colin M. Lancaster
3600 S. Lake Drive
St. Francis, WI 53235 |
|
|
7,670,350 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
% |
|
|
7,670,350 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Point LLC
Attn: Lloyd Blumberg
360 Madison Ave, 24th Floor
New York, NY 10017 |
|
|
10,001,045 |
|
|
|
9.38 |
% |
|
|
10,001,045 |
|
|
|
7.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale Realtors
Supply Attn: Gabriel Elias
509 Spring Avenue
Elkins Park, PA 19027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,425,345 |
4 |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. |
|
|
9,804,172 |
2 |
|
|
9.20 |
% |
|
|
24,095,883 |
3 |
|
|
17.52 |
% |
Bennett K. Hatfield5 |
|
|
354,763 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
354,763 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William D. Campbell5 |
|
|
56,250 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
56,250 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Philip Michael Hardesty5 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Oren Eugene Kitts5 |
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Samuel R. Kitts5 |
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Roger L. Nicholson5 |
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William Scott Perkins5 |
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jon R. Bauer6 |
|
|
10,822,865 |
6 |
|
|
10.15 |
% |
|
|
10,822,865 |
6 |
|
|
7.87 |
% |
George R. Desko7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,862,887 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
% |
Marcia L. Page |
|
|
9,868,755 |
1 |
|
|
9.26 |
% |
|
|
9,868,755 |
1 |
|
|
7.17 |
% |
All directors and executive officers
as a group
(14 persons) |
|
|
31,206,805 |
|
|
|
29.08 |
% |
|
|
48,361,402 |
|
|
|
34.98 |
% |
* |
|
Less than 1% |
|
1 |
|
Represents 1,631,063 common shares held of record by The Värde Fund, L.P.,
1,901,728 shares held by The Värde Fund V, L.P., 886,859 shares held by The Värde Fund VI,
L.P., 1,450,510 shares held by The Värde Fund VI-A, L.P., 162,041 shares held by The Värde
Fund VII, L.P., 80,766 shares held by The Värde Fund VII-A, L.P., 2,160,456 shares held by The
Värde Fund (Cayman) Limited, 893,378 shares held by Värde Investment Partners, L.P., 179,162
shares held by SPhinX Distressed Fund SPC, and 522,792 shares held by Zurich Institutional
Benchmarks Master Fund Limited. All the above shares are controlled by Värde Partners, Inc.,
Värde Management, Inc. or Värde Management International, Inc., all of which are controlled by
Marcia L. Page, Gregory S. McMillan and George C. Hicks. Ms. Page and Messrs. McMillan and
Hicks are (i) the principals, directors and managing partners of Värde Partners, Inc., and
(ii) the principals, directors and vice presidents of Värde Management Inc. and Värde
Management International, Inc. To the extent Ms. Page is deemed to beneficially own these
shares as a result of her position as a principal director or managing partner or vice
president of Värde Partners, Inc., Värde Management, Inc. or Värde Management International,
Inc., Ms. Page disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. |
|
2 |
|
Represents 9,804,172 common shares held of record by WLR Recovery Fund II, L.P. WL
Ross & Co. LLC manages WLR Recovery Fund, II, L.P. Mr. Ross serves as a principal of WL Ross
& Co. LLC, which manages WLR Recovery Fund II, L.P. To the extent Mr. Ross is deemed to
beneficially own these shares as a result of his position as a principal of WL Ross & Co. LLC,
Mr. Ross disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. |
32
3 |
|
Represents 9,804,172 common shares held by WLR Recovery Fund II, L.P., 8,450,276
shares to be received as merger consideration for Anker common shares owned by WLR Recovery
Fund, L.P. and WLR Recovery Fund II, L.P. and 5,841,435 shares to be received as merger
consideration for membership interests in CoalQuest owned by WLR CoalQuest Holding Corp, which
is wholly owned by WLR Recovery Fund II, L.P. WL Ross & Co. LLC manages WLR Recovery Fund II,
L.P. and WLR Recovery Fund, L.P. Mr. Ross serves as a principal of WL Ross & Co. LLC, which
manages WLR Recovery Fund II, L.P. To the extent Mr. Ross is deemed to beneficially own these
shares as a result of his position as a principal of WL Ross & Co. LLC, Mr. Ross disclaims
beneficial ownership of these shares. |
|
4 |
|
Represents 4,678,119 common shares to be received as merger consideration for shares
held in Anker and 2,747,226 common shares to be received as merger consideration for
membership interests in CoalQuest. |
|
5 |
|
Represents options to purchase shares of our common stock which are currently
exercisable and all restricted shares granted to management. See ManagementEmployee Benefit
Plans on page 117 of the public offering preliminary prospectus for information regarding
vesting of the shares of restricted stock. |
|
6 |
|
Represents 10,822,865 common shares held of record by investment management clients of
Contrarian Capital Management LLC. Mr. Bauer serves as the Managing Member of Contrarian
Capital Management LLC. To the extent Mr. Bauer is deemed to beneficially own these shares as
a result of his position as the Managing Member of Contrarian Capital Management LLC, Mr.
Bauer disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. |
|
7 |
|
Represents merger consideration for membership interests in CoalQuest owned by George
and Janet Desko. |
33
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIP AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
For a description of certain related party transactions, see Certain relationships and
related party transactions on page 122 of the public offering preliminary prospectus.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of common shares being registered in connection with the reorganization has been
passed upon by Jones Day, New York, New York.
EXPERTS
The combined financial statements of Horizon NR, LLC and certain subsidiaries (Combined
Companies) as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004, the year ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002,
and for the period January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002, included in this registration statement have
been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated
in their reports appearing in this registration statement (which report on the combined financial
statements expresses an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and includes explanatory
paragraphs referring to (1) fresh start reporting as of May 9, 2002, (2) allocations of certain
assets and expense items applicable to Horizon and subsidiaries, (3) the bankruptcy filing of the
Combined Companies and the fact the combined financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and
classification of liabilities that might result should the Combined Companies be unable to continue
as a going concern, and (4) referring to the restatement of the financial statement schedule) and
are so included in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of ICG, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004
and for period May 13, 2004 to December 31, 2004, included in this prospectus and the related
financial statement schedule included in the registration statement have been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports appearing
in this registration statement (which reports express an unqualified opinion on the financial
statements and financial statement schedule and include an explanatory paragraph referring to the
restatement of the financial statement schedule) and are included in reliance upon the reports of
such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Anker Coal Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in this registration statement
have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as
stated in their report appearing in this registration statement, and are included in reliance upon
the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of CoalQuest Development LLC as of December 31, 2004 and for the year
ended December 31, 2004, included in this registration statement have been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing
in this registration statement, and are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given
upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
EXPERTSCOAL RESERVES
The estimates of ICGs and International Coal Groups proven and probable coal reserves
referred to in this registration statement, to the extent described in this registration statement,
have been prepared by ICG and International Coal Group and reviewed by Marshall Miller &
Associates, Inc.
34
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
International Coal Group has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration
statement on Form S-4 under the Securities Act with respect to the issuance of shares of its common
stock being offered by this prospectus. This prospectus, which forms a part of the registration
statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement,
including the information in the public offering preliminary prospectus. For further information
with respect to International Coal Group and the shares of its common stock, reference is made to
the registration statement. International Coal Group is not currently subjected to the
informational requirements of the Exchange Act. As a result of the offering of the International
Coal Group common shares, International Coal Group will become subject to the informational
requirements of the Exchange Act, and, in accordance therewith, will file reports and other
information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The registration statement, such reports
and other information can be inspected and copied at the Public Reference Room of the Securities
and Exchange Commission located at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of
such materials, including copies of all or any portion of the registration statement, can be
obtained from the Public Reference Room of the Securities and Exchange Commission at prescribed
rates. You can call the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 to obtain information
on the operation of the Public Reference Room. These materials may also be accessed electronically
by means of the Securities and Exchange Commissions home page on the Internet
(http://www.sec.gov).
With respect to other procedures regarding stockholder relations, upon consummation of the
public offering of the International Coal Group common shares, International Coal Group intends to
send its stockholders annual reports containing audited financial statements and make available
quarterly reports containing unaudited financial statements for the first three quarters of each
fiscal year. The annual report will contain a report on financial condition and results of
operations, audited financial statements and such other information as is required under applicable
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations. In addition, after International Coal
Group has completed the public offering of its common shares, it will file annual, quarterly and
current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission
within the time prescribed by the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. International Coal Group intends to make such filings available on its website once
the offering is completed. Information relating to quarterly and annual earnings, declaration of
dividends and reports of material events will be communicated to shareholders as appropriate.
International Coal Group is currently obligated under its charter to deliver certain annual
and quarterly financial information to each shareholder. International Coal Groups obligation to
deliver the foregoing information to shareholders will cease upon the consummation of the public
offering.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following audited and unaudited financial statements of (i) ICG, Inc. (and its
predecessors Horizon NR, LLC and AEI Resources Holding, Inc.), (ii) Anker Coal Group, Inc. and
(iii) CoalQuest Development LLC are contained in the public offering preliminary prospectus
beginning on page F-1:
ICG, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for three months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity for three months ended March 31, 2005
(unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for three months ended March 31,2005 (unaudited)
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of March 31, 2005 and for three
months ended March 31, 2005
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2004
35
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the period May 13, 2004 to December 31, 2004
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity for the period May 13, 2004 to December 31, 2004
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the period May 13, 2004 to December 31, 2004
Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2004 and for the period May
13, 2004 to December 31, 2004
HORIZON NR, LLC AND CERTAIN SUBSIDIARIES
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Combined Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
Combined Statements of Operations for the period January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004, the year
ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002 (reorganized companies) and
the period January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
Combined Statements of Members Deficit for the period January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004, the
year ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002 (reorganized companies)
and the period January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the period January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004, the year
ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002 (reorganized companies) and
the period January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
Notes to Combined Financial Statements as of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004, year ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
ANKER COAL GROUP, INC.
Independent Auditors Report
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Deficit for the three months ended March 31,
2005 (unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
COALQUEST DEVELOPMENT LLC
Independent Auditors Report
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004
Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited) and for the
year ended December 31, 2004
36
Statements of Members Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and for the
year ended December 31, 2004
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited) and for the
year ended December 31, 2004
Notes to Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited) and
for the year ended December 31, 2004
37
ANNEX A: PUBLIC
OFFERING PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS
A-1
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and we are not soliciting offers to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS
Subject to Completion
June 15, 2005
Shares
Common Stock
We are
offering shares
of common stock. Prior to this offering, there has been no
public market for our shares of common stock.
Shares of our common stock are currently quoted on the Pink
Sheets Electronic Quotation Service. The last sale price of our
common stock
on ,
2005, as reported on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation
Service, was
$ per
share. We will apply to list our shares of common stock on The
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ICO.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
Before buying any shares, you should carefully read the
discussion of material risks of investing in our common stock
under Risk factors beginning on page 13 of this
prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share | |
|
Total | |
| |
Public offering price
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
The underwriters may also purchase up to an
additional shares
of our common stock at the public offering price, less the
underwriting discounts and commissions, to cover
over-allotments, if any, within 30 days of the date of this
prospectus. If the underwriters exercise this option in full,
the total underwriting discounts and commissions will be
$ ,
and our total proceeds, before expenses, will be
$ .
The underwriters are offering our common stock as set forth
under Underwriting. Delivery of the shares of common
stock will be made on or
about ,
2005.
|
|
UBS Investment Bank |
Lehman Brothers |
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2005.
[Inside cover graphics to be filed by amendment]
________________________________________________________________________________
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not,
authorized anyone to provide you with additional information or
information different from that contained in this prospectus. We
are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our
common stock only in jurisdictions where those offers and sales
are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is
accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of
the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of our
common stock.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
ADDCARtm
is the registered trademark of ICG, Inc.
Through and
including ,
2005 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus),
federal securities law may require all dealers that effect
transactions in our common stock, whether or not participating
in this offering, to deliver a prospectus. This requirement is
in addition to the dealers obligation to deliver a
prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their
unsold allotments or subscriptions.
i
Prospectus summary
The following summarizes information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus and does not contain all of the information you
should consider in making your investment decision. You should
read this summary together with the more detailed information,
including our financial statements and the related notes,
elsewhere in this prospectus. You should carefully consider,
among other things, the matters discussed in Risk
factors and Managements discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of
operations.
The term Horizon refers to Horizon NR, LLC
(the entity holding the operating subsidiaries of Horizon
Natural Resources Company) and its consolidated subsidiaries,
the term Anker refers to Anker Coal Group, Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries, and the term
CoalQuest refers to CoalQuest Development, LLC.
References to the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions
refer to ICGs acquisition, respectively, of each of Anker
and CoalQuest, which are expected to occur prior to the
effectiveness of the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part. Immediately prior to this offering, ICG
and its subsidiaries will be reorganized so that ICG will be the
parent holding company and ICG, Inc., the current parent holding
company, will become a subsidiary of ICG. Unless the context
otherwise indicates, as used in this prospectus, the terms
ICG, we, our, us
and similar terms refer to International Coal Group, Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries, after giving effect to the
corporate reorganization and the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions. For purposes of the discussion in this prospectus,
references to ICG include all the assets and coal reserves
resulting from the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions. For
purposes of all financial disclosure contained in this
prospectus, ICG, Inc. and Horizon (together with its predecessor
AEI Resources Holding, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries)
are the predecessors to ICG. All information in this prospectus
relating to the beneficial ownership of our common stock is
presented assuming that all existing shares of ICG, Inc. common
stock are exchanged at a 1-for-1 exchange ratio in the corporate
reorganization and that we issue 30,950,129 shares of
common stock in the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions. The term
coal reserves as used in this prospectus means
proven and probable reserves and the term coal
resources in this prospectus means inferred and indicated
reserves.
THE COMPANY
We are a leading producer of coal in Northern and Central
Appalachia with a broad range of mid to high Btu, low sulfur
steam and metallurgical coal. Our Appalachian mining operations,
which include 11 of our mining complexes, are located in West
Virginia, Kentucky and Maryland. We also have a complementary
mining complex of mid to high sulfur steam coal strategically
located in the Illinois Basin. We market our coal to a diverse
customer base of largely investment grade electric utilities, as
well as domestic and international industrial customers. The
high quality of our coal and the availability of multiple
transportation options, including rail, truck and barge,
throughout the Appalachian region enable us to participate in
both the domestic and international coal markets. Due to the
decline in Appalachian coal production in recent years, these
markets are currently characterized by strong demand with
limited supply response and elevated spot and contract prices.
The company was formed by WL Ross & Co. LLC, or WLR,
and other investors in May 2004 to acquire and operate
competitive coal mining facilities. As of September 30,
2004, ICG, Inc. acquired certain key assets of Horizon through a
bankruptcy auction. These assets are high quality reserves
strategically located in Appalachia and the Illinois Basin, are
union free, have limited reclamation liabilities and are
substantially free of other legacy liabilities. Due to our
initial capitalization, we were able to complete the acquisition
without incurring a significant level of indebtedness.
Consistent with the WLR investor groups strategy to
consolidate profitable coal assets, the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions further diversify our reserves. On or about the
same time as the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions, we will
complete a corporate reorganization. With the proceeds of this
offering, we expect to retire substantially all of our debt,
including debt assumed through the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions, and, thus, we will be strategically
well-positioned.
1
As of January 1, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions), we owned or controlled approximately
315 million tons of metallurgical quality coal reserves and
approximately 572 million tons of steam coal reserves. Coal
reserves are the part of a mineral deposit that can be
economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of
the reserve determination. Based on expected 2005 production
rates, our Northern and Central Appalachian reserves could
support existing production levels for approximately
35 years and all of our reserves could support existing
production levels for approximately 49 years. Further, we
own or control approximately 707 million tons of coal
resources, pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions.
Coal resources are coal bearing bodies that have been
sufficiently sampled and analyzed, but do not qualify as a
commercially viable coal reserve as prescribed by SEC rules
until a final comprehensive SEC prescribed evaluation is
performed.
Steam coal is primarily consumed by large electric utilities and
industrial customers as fuel for electricity generation. Demand
for low sulfur steam coal has grown significantly since the
introduction of certain controls associated with the Clean Air
Act and the decline in coal production in the eastern half of
the United States.
Metallurgical coal is primarily used to produce coke, a key raw
material used in the steel making process. Generally,
metallurgical coal sells at a premium to steam coal because of
its higher quality and its importance and value in the steel
making process. During 2004 and the first quarter of 2005, the
demand for metallurgical coal increased substantially as the
global demand for steel increased.
For the year ended December 31, 2004 (pro forma for the
Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions), we sold 18.4 million
tons of coal, of which 18.2 million tons were steam coal
and 0.2 million tons were metallurgical coal. Our steam
coal sales volume in 2004 consisted of mid to high quality, high
Btu (greater than 12,000 Btu/lb.), low sulfur (1.5% or less)
coal, which typically sells at a premium to lower quality, lower
Btu, higher sulfur steam coal. We generated total pro forma
revenues of $673.8 million and $84.4 million of pro
forma earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, as adjusted, or Adjusted EBITDA, for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and total pro forma revenues of
$200.7 million and $33.5 million of pro forma Adjusted
EBITDA, for the three months ended March 31, 2005. For a
reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the most comparable
financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP and of
Adjusted EBITDA to pro forma Adjusted EBITDA, an explanation of
why we present Adjusted EBITDA, and pro forma Adjusted EBITDA,
and how management uses these financial measures, see
Summary historical consolidated and pro forma
financial data of ICG.
OUR STRENGTHS
Ability to provide variety of high-quality steam and
metallurgical coal. Our customers, which include largely
investment grade electric utilities, as well as domestic and
international industrial customers, demand a variety of coal
products. Our variety of coal qualities also allows us to blend
coal in order to meet the specifications of our customers. Our
access to a comprehensive range of high Btu steam and
metallurgical quality coal allows us to market differentiated
coal products to a variety of customers with different coal
quality demands, which allows us to benefit from particularly
strong pricing dynamics in the current market.
Concentration in highly valued Central Appalachian
region. Our operations are primarily located in Central
Appalachia, a region known for its high quality coal
characterized by low sulfur and high Btu content. Production
from Central Appalachian mines accounted for approximately 73.2%
of our 2004 coal sales volume, pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions. We believe that generally favorable
market dynamics and trends in Central Appalachian coal supply
and demand, the high quality of Central Appalachian coal and the
low transportation costs that result from the relative proximity
of Central Appalachian producers and customers have created
favorable pricing dynamics that will continue to provide us with
an advantage over producers from other regions.
2
Significant reserve base providing internal expansion
opportunities. We own approximately 613 million
tons of reserves and control an additional 274 million tons
of reserves through long-term leases, pro forma for the Anker
and CoalQuest acquisitions. We own or control an additional
707 million tons of coal resources, pro forma for the Anker
and CoalQuest acquisitions. We have not yet developed
approximately 73% of these owned and controlled reserves. We
believe these owned and controlled but as yet undeveloped
reserves and resources would allow us to as much as double our
existing production levels over the next several years. Our
ownership and control of such a substantial portion of
undeveloped reserves in both Northern and Central Appalachia and
the Illinois Basin provides us with significant internal growth
opportunities, which is in contrast to other U.S. coal
producers who must acquire or lease new reserves to enable their
growth. We also have coalbed methane reserves in our owned
reserves in West Virginia, which provides us with additional
growth opportunities in this complementary energy market.
Ability to capitalize on strong coal market
dynamics. A significant portion of our coal supply
contracts were renegotiated during the second half of 2004 in
connection with Horizons bankruptcy and were re-priced at
that time to then-current (and more favorable) market prices and
terms. Our marketing effort is focused on maintaining a balance
of longer-term contracts and spot sales. We typically have 50%
of our production contracted by the early part of the previous
year with another 35% contracted by the second half of the year
with the remainder of our production used to take advantage of
market dynamics and maximize value in the spot market.
Diversity of reserves, resources and production.
Our production, reserves and resources are located in three of
the four major coal regions in the United States. Our
production, reserves and resources in Northern and Central
Appalachia and the Illinois Basin provide important geographical
diversity in terms of markets, transportation and labor. The
diversity of our operations and reserves provides us with a
significant competitive advantage, allowing us to source coal
from multiple operations to meet the needs of our customers and
reduce transportation costs.
Minimal level of long-term liabilities. We believe
that compared to other publicly traded U.S. coal producers
we have among the lowest legacy reclamation liabilities and
post-retirement employee obligations. As of March 31, 2005
(pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions), we had
total accrued reclamation liabilities of only
$68.9 million, post-retirement employee obligations of only
$8.4 million, black lung liabilities of
approximately $10.6 million and Coal Act liabilities of
only $4.7 million. In addition, our entire workforce is
union free, which minimizes employee-related liabilities
commonly associated with union-represented mines. As of
March 31, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions), our total debt was $216.7 million and after
this offering we expect to retire all of this debt, excluding
$7.1 million of capitalized leases and other debt
obligations. We believe this low leverage will afford
significant financial and operational flexibility.
Highly skilled management team. The members of our
senior management team have, on average, 23 years of
industry work experience across a variety of mining methods,
including longwall mining. We have substantial Appalachian
mining experience in increasing productivity, reducing costs,
enhancing work safety practices, and maintaining strong customer
relationships. In addition, the majority of our senior
management team has extensive mine development and expansion
experience.
Recognized leadership in safety and environmental
stewardship. The injury incident rates at our mines
throughout 2004, according to the Mine Safety and Health
Administration, or MSHA, were below industry averages. We have
been recognized by safety and environmental agencies with
several prestigious awards for our safety and environmental
record, such as the Sentinels of Safety Award from
MSHA, The Department of Interior Excellence in Surface
Coal Mining and Reclamation Award and a reclamation award
for innovative methods from the West Virginia Coal Association.
Our focus on safety and environmental performance results in the
reduced likelihood of disruption of production at our mines,
which leads to higher productivity and improved financial
performance.
3
OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY
Maximize profitability through highly efficient and
productive mining operations. We are continuing to
evaluate and assess our current operations in order to maximize
operating efficiency and returns on invested capital. We are
focused on maintaining low-cost, highly productive operations by
continuing to invest substantial capital in state-of-the-art
equipment and advanced technologies. We expect to internally
fund approximately $304 million of capital expenditures in
the next two years. As we take advantage of planned expansion
opportunities from 2007 through 2009 principally as a result of
the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions, we expect to spend
approximately $627 million on capital expenditures, which
may require external financing.
Leverage owned and controlled reserve base to generate
substantial internal growth. We own a large undeveloped
reserve in Northern Appalachia containing approximately
194 million tons of high Btu, low sulfur steam and
metallurgical quality coal, pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions. We currently expect underground longwall
mining operations at this reserve to commence within the next
four years, which will increase our production level by
providing highly valued premium quality coal in an increasingly
tight supply market. In addition, we have two substantial
undeveloped reserves in Central Appalachia (pro forma for the
Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions), which contain
56.5 million tons of premium metallurgical coal and are
expected to be developed in the next three to six years.
Further, the substantial reserve position that we own in the
Illinois Basin is expected to allow us to benefit from the
expected increase in demand for high sulfur coal to generate
electricity. We are in the process of developing and exploiting
our coalbed methane reserves. Finally, we intend to
opportunistically acquire new coal reserves and/or coal
companies to expand our coal market opportunities and increase
shareholder value.
Capitalize on favorable industry fundamentals by
opportunistically marketing coal. U.S. coal market
fundamentals are among the strongest in the last 20 years.
We believe this generally favorable pricing environment will
persist given systemic changes in market dynamics such as
long-term supply constraints and increasing demand, particularly
in Central Appalachia and for our metallurgical coal.
Furthermore, because of the high quality of our coal, our access
to a variety of alternative transportation methods, including
truck, rail and barge, and our mix of long-term contract and
spot market sales, we will be able to capitalize on the
favorable industry dynamics to maximize our revenues and
profits. We plan to extend the life of our longer-term contract
arrangements and limit price reopeners in order to lock in
margins and enhance our financial stability, while at the same
time, we plan to maintain an uncommitted portion of planned
production to allow for additional future pricing upside
exposure. As of May 31, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions), we had entered into contracts to sell
approximately 93% of 2005 planned production, approximately 69%
of 2006 planned production and approximately 48% of 2007 planned
production.
Continue to focus on improving workplace safety and
environmental compliance. We have maintained and plan to
continue to maintain an excellent safety and environmental
performance record. We continue to implement safety measures and
environmental initiatives that are designed to promote safe
operating practices and improved environmental stewardship among
our employees. Our ability to maintain a good safety and
environmental record improves our productivity and lowers our
overall cost structure as well as bolsters employee morale.
OUR HISTORY
On February 28, 2002, Horizon (at that time operating as
AEI Resources Holdings, Inc.) filed a voluntary petition for
Chapter 11; its plan of reorganization became effective on
May 8, 2002. As a result of its continuing financial and
operational difficulties, Horizon filed a second voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 on November 13,
2002. Certain of the Horizon assets were sold to us through a
bankruptcy auction and the sale was completed as of
September 30, 2004. The acquisition was financed through
equity investments and borrowings under our senior secured
credit facility,
4
which we entered into at the closing of the Horizon acquisition.
See Description of indebtedness for a discussion of
our senior credit facility.
Prior to the closing of this offering, we plan to consummate the
Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions pursuant to which each of Anker
and CoalQuest are to become indirect wholly owned subsidiaries
of ICG. Holders of the outstanding stock of Anker and the
membership interests in CoalQuest will be issued in the
aggregate up to a maximum of 30,950,129 shares of
ICG common stock. The actual number of shares of common
stock to be issued will be based upon the price of the shares of
common stock sold in this offering and certain other
contingencies. The acquisitions are subject to certain closing
conditions. See Business Our
history The Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions
for additional information regarding the acquisitions.
On or about the same time as the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions, we will complete a corporate reorganization. Prior
to this reorganization, our current top-tier parent holding
company is ICG, Inc. (formerly known as International Coal
Group, Inc.). On completion, ICG (formerly known as ICG Holdco,
Inc.) will become the new top-tier parent holding company. The
stockholders of ICG, Inc. are expected to receive one share of
our common stock for each share of ICG, Inc. common stock. The
names of the entities were changed in anticipation of the
corporate reorganization and this offering. ICG is issuing its
shares of common stock to the public in this offering. All
stockholders of ICG, Inc., all Anker stockholders and all
CoalQuest members will be stockholders of ICG after the
corporate reorganization and the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions. The following chart reflects our corporate
organizational structure following the consummation of the Anker
and CoalQuest acquisitions, the corporate reorganization and
this offering:
COAL MARKET OUTLOOK
According to traded coal indices and reference prices, U.S. and
international coal demand is currently strong, and coal pricing
has increased year-over-year in each of our coal production
markets. We believe that the current strong fundamentals in the
U.S. coal industry result primarily from:
|
|
4 |
stronger industrial demand following a recovery in the
U.S. manufacturing sector, evidenced by the preliminary
estimate of 3.5% real gross domestic product growth in the first
quarter of 2005, as reported by the Bureau of Economic Analysis; |
|
4 |
relatively low customer stockpiles, estimated by the
U.S. Energy Information Administration, or EIA, to be
approximately 99 million tons at the end of February 2005,
down 8% from the same period in the prior year; |
5
|
|
4 |
declining coal production in Central Appalachia, including a
decline of 11% in Central Appalachian coal production volume
from 2000 to 2004, primarily a result of the depletion of
economically attractive reserves, permitting issues that delay
mine development and increasing costs of production; |
|
4 |
capacity constraints of U.S. nuclear-powered electricity
generators, which operated at an average utilization rate of
88.4% in 2003, up from 70.5% in 1993, as estimated by the EIA; |
|
4 |
high current and forward prices for natural gas and oil, the
primary alternative fuels for electricity generation, with spot
prices as of June 2, 2005 for natural gas and heating oil
at $6.66 per million Btu and $1.54 per gallon,
respectively, as reported by Bloomberg L.P.; and |
|
4 |
increased international demand for U.S. coal for
steelmaking, driven by global economic growth, high ocean
freight rates and the weak U.S. dollar. |
U.S. spot steam coal prices have steadily increased since
mid-2003, particularly for coals sourced in the eastern United
States. As reported by Bloomberg L.P., the average price of high
Btu, low sulfur Central Appalachia coal was $58.50/ton, during
the week of June 3, 2005. This price level represents a
dramatic 64.9% increase in the price of coal since January 2004.
CENTRAL APPALACHIA COAL REFERENCE
PRICE1
Source: Bloomberg L.P.
|
|
Note: (1) |
Represents coal which meets the specifications (minimum
12,000 Btu/lb, maximum 1.00% sulfur) for Central Appalachian
steam coal traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange. |
We expect near-term volume growth in U.S. coal consumption
to be driven by greater utilization at existing coal-fired
electricity generating plants. Nationally, capacity utilization
for coal plants (excluding combined heat and power) is expected
to rise from 72% in 2003 to 83% in 2025, according to the EIA.
If existing U.S. coal-fired plants operate at estimated
potential utilization rates of 85%, we believe they would
consume approximately 180 million additional tons of coal
per year, which represents an increase of approximately 18% over
current coal consumption.
We expect longer-term volume growth in U.S. coal
consumption to be driven by the construction of new coal-fired
plants. The National Energy Technology Laboratory, or NETL, an
arm of the U.S. Department of Energy, or DOE, projects that
112,000 megawatts of new coal-fired electric generation capacity
will be constructed in the United States by 2025. The NETL has
identified 106 coal-fired plants, representing 65,000 megawatts
of electric generation capacity, that have been proposed and are
currently in various stages of development.
The current pricing environment for U.S. metallurgical coal
is also strong in both the domestic and seaborne export markets.
Demand for metallurgical coal in the United States has recently
increased due
6
to a recovery in the U.S. steel industry. In addition, the
supply for metallurgical coal in the United States has been
temporarily restricted as Consol Energy was forced to seal its
Buchanan mine on February 14, 2005 due to an underground
fire. The Buchanan mine produced 4.4 million tons of
metallurgical coal in 2004 and has yet to return into service.
In addition to increased demand for metallurgical coal in the
United States, demand for metallurgical coal has increased in
international markets. According to the International Iron and
Steel Institute, Chinese steel consumption increased 25% in 2003
as compared to 2002, and Asia-Pacific Rim consumption of
metallurgical coal continues to strain supply. For example, BHP
Billiton, a major Australian coal producer, reported
average 2005 price settlement increases of 120% for
approximately three quarters of its annually priced
metallurgical coal contracts from the prior year. Fording
Canadian Coal Trust, a major Canadian metallurgical coal
producer, announced substantially all metallurgical coal
contracts for the 2005 coal year are priced at an average of
$125 per ton, an increase of 140% over the average sales
price during 2004. The dramatic rise in metallurgical coal
prices in global markets is due in part to concerns over the
availability of sufficient supply and the significant increase
in steel production in China. In addition, weakness of the
U.S. dollar has made U.S. metallurgical coal more
competitive in international markets.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND STRATEGY
Our ability to execute our strategy is subject to the risks that
are generally associated with the coal industry. For example,
our profitability could decline due to changes in coal prices or
coal consumption patterns, as well as unanticipated mine
operating conditions, loss of customers, changes in our ability
to access our coal reserves and other factors that are not
within our control. Furthermore, the heavily regulated nature of
the coal industry imposes significant actual and potential costs
on us, and future regulations could increase those costs or
limit our ability to produce coal.
We are also subject to a number of risks related to our
competitive position and business strategies. For example, our
business strategy exposes us to the risks involving our
long-term coal supply contracts, the demand for coal,
electricity and steel, our projected plans and objectives for
future operations and expansion or consolidation, the
integration of Anker and CoalQuest into our business, and future
economic or capital market conditions. In addition, our focus on
the Central Appalachian region exposes us to the risks of
operating in this region, including higher costs of production
as compared to other coal-producing regions and more costly and
restrictive permitting, licensing and other environmental and
regulatory requirements.
For additional risks relating to our business, the coal industry
and this offering, see Risk factors beginning on
page 13 of this prospectus.
OUR SPONSOR
WL Ross & Co. LLC was organized on April 1, 2000
by Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. and other members of the
Restructuring Group of Rothschild Inc. This team had
restructured more than $200 billion of liabilities in North
America and other parts of the world. The firm maintains offices
in New York City and has become the sponsor of more than
$2.0 billion of alternative investment partnerships on
behalf of major U.S., European and Japanese institutional
investors. Selected current and recent portfolio companies
include International Steel Group, the largest integrated steel
producer in North America, and International Textile Group, a
combination of Burlington Industries and Cone Mills.
Our principal executive office is located at 2000 Ashland Drive,
Ashland, Kentucky 41101 and our telephone number is
(606) 920-7400.
You should carefully consider the information contained in the
Risk factors section of this prospectus before you
decide to purchase shares of our common stock.
7
The offering
|
|
|
Common stock we are offering |
|
shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
shares |
|
Use of proceeds after expenses |
|
We estimate that the net proceeds from this offering, after
expenses, will be approximately
$ ,
or approximately
$ if
the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full,
assuming a public offering price of
$ per
share. As of March 31, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions), our total debt was $216.7 million.
We expect to retire all of this debt, excluding
$7.1 million of capitalized leases and other debt
obligations, with the net proceeds of this offering and to use
the remaining net proceeds for general corporate purposes. See
Use of proceeds. |
|
Over-allotment option |
|
We have granted the underwriters an option to purchase up
to additional
shares of our common stock to cover over-allotments. |
|
Proposed New York Stock Exchange symbol |
|
ICO |
The number of shares of our common stock outstanding immediately
after this offering is based on
approximately shares
outstanding as
of ,
2005. Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this
prospectus assumes that we
issue shares
of our common stock in the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions and
all outstanding shares of common stock of ICG, Inc. are
exchanged for shares of our common stock at a 1-for-1 exchange
ratio in the reorganization.
The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding
immediately after this offering excludes:
|
|
4 |
the shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of options
we plan to grant prior to the effectiveness of the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part; and |
|
4 |
the shares of our common stock expected to be available for
future grant under the equity incentive plan we plan to adopt
prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement of
which this prospectus is a part. |
Unless we specifically state otherwise, all information in this
prospectus assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their
option to purchase additional shares. See
Underwriting.
8
Summary historical consolidated and pro forma financial data of
ICG
ICG is a recently formed holding company which does not have any
independent external operations, assets or liabilities, other
than through its operating subsidiaries. Prior to the
acquisition of certain assets of Horizon as of
September 30, 2004, our predecessor, ICG, Inc., did not
have any material assets, liabilities or results of operations.
The summary historical consolidated financial data as of and for
the period from May 13, 2004 to December 31, 2004 have
been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements
of ICG, Inc. and the summary historical consolidated financial
data as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2005
have been derived from ICG, Inc.s unaudited consolidated
financial statements. The following summary historical
consolidated financial data as of and for the period
January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004, the year ended
December 31, 2003 and the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002 has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements of Horizon (the predecessor to
ICG for accounting purposes) and the summary historical
consolidated financial statements for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 have been derived from Horizons
unaudited consolidated financial statements. The summary
historical consolidated financial data for the period
January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002 has been derived from
the audited consolidated financial statements of AEI Resources
(the predecessor to Horizon for accounting purposes). The
financial statements for the predecessor periods have been
prepared on a carve-out basis to include the assets,
liabilities and results of operations of ICG that were
previously included in the consolidated financial statements of
Horizon. The financial statements for the predecessor periods
include allocations of certain expenses, taxation charges,
interest and cash balances relating to the predecessor based on
managements estimates. The predecessor financial
information is not necessarily indicative of the consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows of ICG
if it had operated during the predecessor periods presented. In
the opinion of management, such financial data reflect all
adjustments, consisting only of normal and recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results
for those periods. The results of operations for the interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the full year or any future period.
The following summary unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
data of ICG, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and the three months ended
March 31, 2005 have been prepared to give pro forma effect
to our corporate reorganization and our acquisitions of Horizon,
Anker and CoalQuest, as if each had occurred on January 1,
2004, in the case of unaudited pro forma statement of operations
data, and on March 31, 2005, in the case of unaudited pro
forma balance sheet data. The successor balance sheet data and
pro forma adjustments used in preparing the pro forma financial
data reflect our preliminary estimates of the purchase price
allocation to certain assets and liabilities. The pro forma
financial data are for informational purposes only and should
not be considered indicative of actual results that would have
been achieved had the transactions actually been consummated on
the dates indicated and do not purport to indicate balance sheet
data or results of operations as of any future date or for any
future period. You should read the following data in conjunction
with Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial
information, Managements discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of operations
and the audited consolidated financial statements and related
notes of each of ICG, Inc., Horizon (and its predecessors),
Anker and CoalQuest, each included elsewhere in this prospectus.
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AEI | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOURCES | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HORIZON | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to | |
|
|
HORIZON | |
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon | |
|
|
Predecessor to ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
to ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
Period | |
|
|
Period | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
May 10, | |
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
May 13, | |
|
|
Three months | |
|
|
Three months | |
|
Pro forma year | |
|
three months | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
2002 to | |
|
Year ended | |
|
2004 to | |
|
|
2004 to | |
|
|
ended | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
to May 9, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004(3) | |
|
2005(3) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Statement of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales revenues
|
|
$ |
136,040 |
|
|
|
$ |
264,235 |
|
|
$ |
441,291 |
|
|
$ |
346,981 |
|
|
|
$ |
130,463 |
|
|
|
$ |
110,013 |
|
|
|
$ |
144,197 |
|
|
$ |
624,120 |
|
|
$ |
186,339 |
|
|
Freight and handling revenues
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
|
6,032 |
|
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
15,996 |
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
21,183 |
|
|
|
|
27,397 |
|
|
|
31,771 |
|
|
|
22,702 |
|
|
|
|
4,766 |
|
|
|
|
6,452 |
|
|
|
|
6,536 |
|
|
|
33,696 |
|
|
|
8,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
160,170 |
|
|
|
|
297,664 |
|
|
|
481,070 |
|
|
|
373,383 |
|
|
|
|
136,109 |
|
|
|
|
118,276 |
|
|
|
|
153,232 |
|
|
|
673,812 |
|
|
|
200,676 |
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
|
6,032 |
|
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
15,996 |
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues (exclusive of
depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)
|
|
|
114,767 |
|
|
|
|
251,361 |
|
|
|
400,652 |
|
|
|
306,429 |
|
|
|
|
113,707 |
|
|
|
|
98,002 |
|
|
|
|
117,184 |
|
|
|
564,723 |
|
|
|
157,690 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
32,316 |
|
|
|
|
40,033 |
|
|
|
52,254 |
|
|
|
27,547 |
|
|
|
|
7,943 |
|
|
|
|
9,502 |
|
|
|
|
8,522 |
|
|
|
46,054 |
|
|
|
11,656 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative (exclusive of depreciation,
depletion and amortization shown separately above)
|
|
|
9,677 |
|
|
|
|
16,695 |
|
|
|
23,350 |
|
|
|
8,477 |
|
|
|
|
4,194 |
|
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
|
4,935 |
|
|
|
17,257 |
|
|
|
6,045 |
|
|
(Gain)/loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(4,320 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
Writedowns and other items
|
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
|
729,953 |
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
167,937 |
|
|
|
|
1,044,035 |
|
|
|
489,044 |
|
|
|
355,945 |
|
|
|
|
126,714 |
|
|
|
|
111,584 |
|
|
|
|
133,140 |
|
|
|
653,812 |
|
|
|
180,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(7,767 |
) |
|
|
|
(746,371 |
) |
|
|
(7,974 |
) |
|
|
17,438 |
|
|
|
|
9,395 |
|
|
|
|
6,692 |
|
|
|
|
20,092 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
19,690 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(36,666 |
) |
|
|
|
(80,405 |
) |
|
|
(145,892 |
) |
|
|
(114,211 |
) |
|
|
|
(3,453 |
) |
|
|
|
(37,217 |
) |
|
|
|
(3,145 |
) |
|
|
(16,293 |
) |
|
|
(3,946 |
) |
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
1,567,689 |
|
|
|
|
(143,663 |
) |
|
|
(52,784 |
) |
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
8,329 |
|
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other income (expense)
|
|
|
1,531,522 |
|
|
|
|
(222,812 |
) |
|
|
(198,489 |
) |
|
|
(111,903 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,555 |
) |
|
|
|
(15,838 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,509 |
) |
|
|
(7,237 |
) |
|
|
(1,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
1,523,755 |
|
|
|
|
(969,183 |
) |
|
|
(206,463 |
) |
|
|
(94,465 |
) |
|
|
|
6,840 |
|
|
|
|
(9,146 |
) |
|
|
|
17,583 |
|
|
|
12,763 |
|
|
|
17,878 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,726 |
) |
|
|
(4,835 |
) |
|
|
(6,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,523,755 |
|
|
|
$ |
(969,183 |
) |
|
$ |
(206,463 |
) |
|
$ |
(94,465 |
) |
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,146 |
) |
|
|
$ |
10,857 |
|
|
$ |
7,928 |
|
|
$ |
11,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AEI | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESOURCES | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HORIZON | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to | |
|
|
HORIZON | |
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon | |
|
|
Predecessor to ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
to ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
Period | |
|
|
Period | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
May 10, | |
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
May 13, | |
|
|
Three months | |
|
|
Three months | |
|
Pro forma year | |
|
three months | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
2002 to | |
|
Year ended | |
|
2004 to | |
|
|
2004 to | |
|
|
ended | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
to May 9, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004(3) | |
|
2005(3) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except per share and per ton data) | |
Earnings (loss) per
share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
Average common shares outstanding
(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
137,556,128 |
|
|
|
137,556,128 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
137,556,128 |
|
|
|
137,556,128 |
|
Balance sheet data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
87,278 |
|
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,967 |
|
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
|
$ |
24,974 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,032 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,521,318 |
|
|
|
|
484,212 |
|
|
|
407,064 |
|
|
|
370,298 |
|
|
|
|
459,975 |
|
|
|
|
414,373 |
|
|
|
|
480,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875,059 |
|
Long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
933,106 |
|
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
173,446 |
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
172,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,372 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,286,318 |
|
|
|
|
1,222,218 |
|
|
|
1,351,393 |
|
|
|
1,409,092 |
|
|
|
|
305,575 |
|
|
|
|
1,367,847 |
|
|
|
|
315,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418,552 |
|
Total stockholders equity (members deficit)
|
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
(738,006 |
) |
|
$ |
(944,329 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,038,794 |
) |
|
|
$ |
154,400 |
|
|
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
165,257 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
456,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (members deficit)
|
|
$ |
1,521,318 |
|
|
|
$ |
484,212 |
|
|
$ |
407,064 |
|
|
$ |
370,298 |
|
|
|
$ |
459,975 |
|
|
|
$ |
414,373 |
|
|
|
$ |
480,349 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
875,059 |
|
Other financial data (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$ |
33,371 |
|
|
|
$ |
24,871 |
|
|
$ |
53,567 |
|
|
$ |
56,584 |
|
|
|
$ |
18,236 |
|
|
|
$ |
16,198 |
|
|
|
$ |
29,250 |
|
|
$ |
84,401 |
(4) |
|
$ |
33,480 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
(298,196 |
) |
|
|
$ |
76,372 |
|
|
$ |
17,753 |
|
|
$ |
34,057 |
|
|
|
$ |
30,209 |
|
|
|
$ |
17,025 |
|
|
|
$ |
21,837 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
$ |
(10,841 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(12,799 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,549 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,535 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(329,166 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(1,720 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(18,519 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
$ |
259,011 |
|
|
|
$ |
(78,025 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,459 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,381 |
) |
|
|
$ |
322,924 |
|
|
|
$ |
(15,597 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(2,311 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
10,963 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,435 |
|
|
$ |
16,937 |
|
|
$ |
6,624 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,583 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,890 |
|
|
|
$ |
18,519 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating data (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons sold
|
|
|
5,416 |
|
|
|
|
11,124 |
|
|
|
16,655 |
|
|
|
10,421 |
|
|
|
|
3,582 |
|
|
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
|
3,554 |
|
|
|
18,400 |
|
|
|
4,999 |
|
Tons produced
|
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
|
|
7,139 |
|
|
|
12,041 |
|
|
|
8,812 |
|
|
|
|
2,959 |
|
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
|
|
|
3,015 |
|
|
|
14,591 |
|
|
|
3,761 |
|
Average coal sales realization (per ton)
|
|
$ |
25.12 |
|
|
|
$ |
23.75 |
|
|
$ |
26.50 |
|
|
$ |
33.30 |
|
|
|
$ |
36.42 |
|
|
|
$ |
31.63 |
|
|
|
$ |
40.57 |
|
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
|
$ |
37.26 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Earnings per share data and average shares outstanding are
not presented for the period from January 1, 2002 to
May 9, 2002, period from May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002, year ended December 31, 2003, the
period from January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004 and
the three months ended March 31, 2004 because they were
prepared on a carve-out basis. |
|
(2) |
Adjusted EBITDA represents net income (but excluding
reorganization items and writedowns and other items) before
deducting net interest expense, income taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization. We present Adjusted EBITDA and pro
forma Adjusted EBITDA because we consider them important
supplemental measures of our performance and believe they are
frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other
interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our
industry, substantially all of which present Adjusted EBITDA
when reporting their results. |
|
|
|
We also use Adjusted EBITDA for the following purposes: Our
executive compensation plan bases incentive compensation
payments on our EBITDA performance measured against budgets and
a peer group. Our credit agreement uses Adjusted EBITDA (with
additional adjustments) to measure our compliance with
covenants, such as interest coverage and debt incurrence.
Adjusted EBITDA is also widely used by us and others in our
industry to evaluate and price potential acquisition
candidates. |
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA and pro forma Adjusted EBITDA have
limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider
them in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our
results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations
are: |
|
|
|
|
4 |
Adjusted EBITDA and pro forma Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect
our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital
expenditures or contractual commitments; |
|
|
4 |
Adjusted EBITDA and pro forma Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect
changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital
needs; |
|
|
4 |
Adjusted EBITDA and pro forma Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect
the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements
necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our
debts; |
11
|
|
|
|
4 |
Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges,
the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be
replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA and pro forma
Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such
replacements; and |
|
|
4 |
Other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA
and pro forma Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, limiting
their usefulness as comparative measures |
|
|
4 |
Adjusted EBITDA and pro forma Adjusted EBITDA are a measure
of our performance that are not required by, or presented in
accordance with, GAAP and we also believe each is a useful
indicator of our ability to meet debt service and capital
expenditure requirements. Adjusted EBITDA and pro forma Adjusted
EBITDA are not measurements of our financial performance under
GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income,
operating income or any other performance measures derived in
accordance with GAAP or as an alternative to cash flow from
operating activities as a measure of our liquidity. |
|
|
|
The following table reconciles (i) net income, which we
believe to be the closest GAAP performance measure, to EBITDA
and (ii) EBITDA to Adjusted EBITDA. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AEI | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon | |
|
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor | |
|
|
Horizon | |
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor to | |
|
|
|
|
|
to Horizon) | |
|
|
(Predecessor to ICG, Inc.) | |
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
Three | |
|
|
Three | |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
May 10, | |
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
May 13, | |
|
|
months | |
|
|
months | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2002 to | |
|
Year ended | |
|
2004 to | |
|
|
2004 to | |
|
|
ended | |
|
|
ended | |
|
|
2002 to | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
May 9, 2002 | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
2004(3) | |
|
|
2005(3) | |
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,523,755 |
|
|
|
$ |
(969,183 |
) |
|
$ |
(206,463 |
) |
|
$ |
(94,465 |
) |
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,146 |
) |
|
|
$ |
10,857 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
36,666 |
|
|
|
|
80,405 |
|
|
|
145,892 |
|
|
|
114,211 |
|
|
|
|
3,453 |
|
|
|
|
37,217 |
|
|
|
|
3,145 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,726 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense
|
|
|
32,316 |
|
|
|
|
40,033 |
|
|
|
52,254 |
|
|
|
27,547 |
|
|
|
|
7,943 |
|
|
|
|
9,502 |
|
|
|
|
8,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
1,592,737 |
|
|
|
$ |
(848,745 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,317 |
) |
|
$ |
47,293 |
|
|
|
$ |
18,236 |
|
|
|
$ |
37,573 |
|
|
|
$ |
29,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization items(a)
|
|
|
(1,567,689 |
) |
|
|
|
143,663 |
|
|
|
52,784 |
|
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Writedowns and other items(a)
|
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
|
729,953 |
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EBITDA adjustments
|
|
|
(1,559,366 |
) |
|
|
|
873,616 |
|
|
|
61,884 |
|
|
|
9,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
33,371 |
|
|
|
$ |
24,871 |
|
|
$ |
53,567 |
|
|
$ |
56,584 |
|
|
|
$ |
18,236 |
|
|
|
$ |
16,198 |
|
|
|
$ |
29,250 |
|
|
|
(a) |
See Notes 14-15 to Horizons audited combined financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
|
(3) |
The summary unaudited pro forma data of ICG, Inc. and its
subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004
and the three months ended March 31, 2005 have been
prepared to give pro forma effect to our corporate
reorganization, the acquisition of Horizon, Anker and CoalQuest,
as if each had occurred on January 1, 2004, in the case of
unaudited statements of operations data, and on March 31,
2005, in the case of unaudited pro forma balance sheet data. |
|
(4) |
The following table reconciles (i) pro forma net income,
which we believe to be the closest GAAP performance measure, to
pro forma EBITDA and (ii) pro forma EBITDA to pro forma
Adjusted EBITDA. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma three | |
|
|
Pro forma year ended | |
|
months ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
Net income
|
|
$ |
7,928 |
|
|
$ |
11,039 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
16,293 |
|
|
|
3,946 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4,835 |
|
|
|
6,839 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense
|
|
|
46,054 |
|
|
|
11,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma EBITDA
|
|
|
75,110 |
|
|
|
33,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Writedowns and other items
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pro forma EBITDA adjustments
|
|
|
9,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
84,401 |
|
|
$ |
33,480 |
|
12
Risk factors
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors,
together with the other information contained in this
prospectus, before investing in our common stock. If any of the
following risks develop into actual events, our business,
financial condition or results of operations could be materially
adversely affected, the trading price of your shares of our
common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your
investment.
RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS
Because of our limited operating history, we believe that
historical information regarding our company prior to
October 1, 2004 and for Horizon, our predecessor for
accounting purposes, is of little relevance in understanding our
business as currently conducted.
We are subject to the risks, uncertainties, expenses and
problems encountered by companies in the early stages of
operations. ICG was incorporated in March 2005 as a holding
company and our predecessor, ICG, Inc., was incorporated in
May 2004 for the sole purpose of acquiring certain assets
of Horizon. Until we completed that acquisition we had
substantially no operations. As a result, we believe the
historical financial information presented in this prospectus,
other than for the period ended December 31, 2004 and the
three months ended March 31, 2005, which do not include the
historical financial information for Anker and CoalQuest, are of
limited relevance in understanding our business as currently
conducted. The financial statements for the predecessor periods
have been prepared from the books and records of Horizon as if
ICG had existed as a separate legal entity under common
management for all periods presented (that is, on a
carve-out basis). The financial statements for the
predecessor periods include allocations of certain expenses,
taxation charges, interest and cash balances relating to the
predecessor based on managements estimates. In light of
these allocations and estimates, the predecessor financial
information is not necessarily indicative of the consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows of ICG
if it had operated during the predecessor period presented. See
Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data,
Selected historical consolidated financial data of
ICG and Managements discussion and analysis of
financial condition and results of operations.
A substantial or extended decline in coal prices could reduce
our revenues and the value of our coal reserves.
Our results of operations are substantially dependent upon the
prices we receive for our coal. The prices we receive for coal
depend upon factors beyond our control, including:
|
|
4 |
the supply of and demand for domestic and foreign coal; |
|
4 |
the demand for electricity; |
|
4 |
domestic and foreign demand for steel and the continued
financial viability of the domestic and/or foreign steel
industry; |
|
4 |
the proximity to, capacity of and cost of transportation
facilities; |
|
4 |
domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes; |
|
4 |
air emission standards for coal-fired power plants; |
|
4 |
regulatory, administrative and judicial decisions; |
13
Risk factors
|
|
4 |
the price and availability of alternative fuels, including the
effects of technological developments; and |
|
4 |
the effect of worldwide energy conservation measures. |
Our results of operations are dependent upon the prices we
charge for our coal as well as our ability to improve
productivity and control costs. Any decreased demand would cause
spot prices to decline and require us to increase productivity
and decrease costs in order to maintain our margins. Declines in
the prices we receive for our coal could adversely affect our
operating results and our ability to generate the cash flows we
require to improve our productivity and invest in our operations.
Our coal mining production is subject to operating risks that
could result in higher operating expenses and/or decreased
production.
Our revenues depend on our level of coal mining production. The
level of our production is subject to operating conditions and
events beyond our control that could disrupt operations and
affect production at particular mines for varying lengths of
time. These conditions and events include:
|
|
4 |
the unavailability of qualified labor; |
|
4 |
our inability to acquire, maintain or renew necessary permits or
mining or surface rights in a timely manner, if at all; |
|
4 |
unfavorable geologic conditions, such as the thickness of the
coal deposits and the amount of rock embedded in or overlying
the coal deposit; |
|
4 |
failure of reserve estimates to prove correct; |
|
4 |
changes in governmental regulation of the coal industry,
including the imposition of additional taxes, fees or actions to
suspend or revoke our permits or changes in the manner of
enforcement of existing regulations; |
|
4 |
mining and processing equipment failures and unexpected
maintenance problems; |
|
4 |
adverse weather and natural disasters, such as heavy rains and
flooding; |
|
4 |
increased water entering mining areas and increased or
accidental mine water discharges; |
|
4 |
increased or unexpected reclamation costs; |
|
4 |
interruptions due to transportation delays; |
|
4 |
the unavailability of required equipment of the type and size
needed to meet production expectations; and |
|
4 |
unexpected mine safety accidents, including fires and explosions
from methane. |
These conditions and events may increase our cost of mining and
delay or halt production at particular mines either permanently
or for varying lengths of time. In addition, we may experience
disruptions in our supply of coal from third parties who produce
coal for us due to the foregoing conditions and events. Any
interruptions in the production of coal by us or third parties
who supply us with coal could adversely affect our business and
revenues.
14
Risk factors
Any change in coal consumption patterns by North American
electric power generators resulting in a decrease in the use of
coal by those consumers could result in lower prices for our
coal, which would reduce our revenues and adversely impact our
earnings and the value of our coal reserves.
Steam coal accounted for nearly all of our coal sales volume in
2004, pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions. The
majority of our sales of steam coal in 2004 were to electric
power generators. Domestic electric power generation accounted
for approximately 92% of all U.S. coal consumption in
2003, according to the EIA. The amount of coal consumed for
U.S. electric power generation is affected primarily by the
overall demand for electricity, the location, availability,
quality and price of competing fuels for power such as natural
gas, nuclear, fuel oil and alternative energy sources such as
hydroelectric power, technological developments, and
environmental and other governmental regulations.
We expect that many new power plants will be built to produce
electricity during peak periods of demand, when the demand for
electricity rises above the base load demand, or
minimum amount of electricity required if consumption occurred
at a steady rate. However, we also expect that many of these new
power plants will be fired by natural gas because gas-fired
plants are cheaper to construct than coal-fired plants and
because natural gas is a cleaner burning fuel. Gas-fired
generation from existing and newly constructed gas-fired
facilities has the potential to displace coal-fired generation,
particularly from older, less efficient coal-powered generators.
In addition, the increasingly stringent requirements of the
Clean Air Act may result in more electric power generators
shifting from coal to natural gas-fired plants. Any reduction in
the amount of coal consumed by North American electric power
generators could reduce the price of steam coal that we mine and
sell, thereby reducing our revenues and adversely impacting our
earnings and the value of our coal reserves.
Weather patterns also can greatly affect electricity generation.
Extreme temperatures, both hot and cold, cause increased power
usage and, therefore, increased generating requirements from all
sources. Mild temperatures, on the other hand, result in lower
electrical demand, which allows generators to choose the
lowest-cost sources of power generation when deciding which
generation sources to dispatch. Accordingly, significant changes
in weather patterns could reduce the demand for our coal.
Overall economic activity and the associated demands for power
by industrial users can have significant effects on overall
electricity demand. Robust economic activity can cause much
heavier demands for power, particularly if such activity results
in increased utilization of industrial assets during evening and
nighttime periods. The economic slowdown experienced during the
last several years significantly slowed the growth of electrical
demand and, in some locations, resulted in contraction of
demand. Any downward pressure on coal prices, whether due to
increased use of alternative energy sources, changes in weather
patterns, decreases in overall demand or otherwise, would likely
cause our profitability to decline.
Our profitability may be adversely affected by the status of
our long-term coal supply agreements and changes in purchasing
patterns in the coal industry may make it difficult for us to
extend existing agreements or enter into long-term supply
agreements, which could adversely affect the capability and
profitability of our operations.
We sell a significant portion of our coal under long-term coal
supply agreements, which we define as contracts with a term
greater than 12 months. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions), approximately 70% of our revenues were derived
from coal sales that were made under long-term coal supply
agreements. As of that date, we had 28 long-term sales
agreements with a volume-weighted average term of approximately
5.1 years. The
15
Risk factors
prices for coal shipped under these agreements are fixed for the
initial year of the contract, subject to certain adjustments in
later years, and thus may be below the current market price for
similar type coal at any given time, depending on the timeframe
of contract execution or initiation. As a consequence of the
substantial volume of our sales that are subject to these
long-term agreements, we have less coal available with which to
capitalize on higher coal prices, if and when they arise. In
addition, in some cases, our ability to realize the higher
prices that may be available in the spot market may be
restricted when customers elect to purchase higher volumes
allowable under some contracts.
When our current contracts with customers expire or are
otherwise renegotiated, our customers may decide not to extend
or enter into new long-term contracts or, in the absence of
long-term contracts, our customers may decide to purchase fewer
tons of coal than in the past or on different terms, including
under different pricing terms. For additional information
relating to these contracts, see Business Customers
and coal contracts Long-term coal supply agreements.
Furthermore, as electric utilities seek to adjust to
requirements of the Clean Air Act, particularly the Acid Rain
regulations, the Clean Air Mercury Rule and the Clean Air
Interstate Rule, and the possible deregulation of their
industry, they could become increasingly less willing to enter
into long-term coal supply agreements and instead may purchase
higher percentages of coal under short-term supply agreements.
To the extent the electric utility industry shifts away from
long-term supply agreements, it could adversely affect us and
the level of our revenues. For example, fewer electric utilities
will have a contractual obligation to purchase coal from us,
thereby increasing the risk that we will not have a market for
our production. Furthermore, spot market prices tend to be more
volatile than contractual prices, which could result in
decreased revenues.
Certain provisions in our long-term supply agreements may
provide limited protection during adverse economic conditions or
may result in economic penalties upon the failure to meet
specifications.
Price adjustment, price reopener and other similar
provisions in long-term supply agreements may reduce the
protection from short-term coal price volatility traditionally
provided by such contracts. Most of our coal supply agreements
contain provisions that allow for the purchase price to be
renegotiated at periodic intervals. These price reopener
provisions may automatically set a new price based on the
prevailing market price or, in some instances, require the
parties to agree on a new price, sometimes between a specified
range of prices. In some circumstances, failure of the parties
to agree on a price under a price reopener provision can lead to
termination of the contract. Any adjustment or renegotiations
leading to a significantly lower contract price would result in
decreased revenues. Accordingly, supply contracts with terms of
one year or more may provide only limited protection during
adverse market conditions.
Coal supply agreements also typically contain force majeure
provisions allowing temporary suspension of performance by us or
our customers during the duration of specified events beyond the
control of the affected party. Most of our coal supply
agreements contain provisions requiring us to deliver coal
meeting quality thresholds for certain characteristics such as
Btu, sulfur content, ash content, hardness and ash fusion
temperature. Failure to meet these specifications could result
in economic penalties, including price adjustments, the
rejection of deliveries or, in the extreme, termination of the
contracts.
Consequently, due to the risks mentioned above with respect to
long-term supply agreements, we may not achieve the revenue or
profit we expect to achieve from these sales commitments. In
addition, we may not be able to successfully convert these sales
commitments into long-term supply agreements.
16
Risk factors
A decline in demand for metallurgical coal would limit our
ability to sell our high quality steam coal as higher-priced
metallurgical coal.
Portions of our coal reserves possess quality characteristics
that enable us to mine, process and market them as either
metallurgical coal or high quality steam coal, depending on the
prevailing conditions in the metallurgical and steam coal
markets. We will decide whether to mine, process and market
these coals as metallurgical or steam coal based on
managements assessment as to which market is likely to
provide us with a higher margin. We will consider a number of
factors when making this assessment, including the difference
between the current and anticipated future market prices of
steam coal and metallurgical coal, the lower volume of saleable
tons that results from producing a given quantity of reserves
for sale in the metallurgical market instead of the steam
market, the increased costs incurred in producing coal for sale
in the metallurgical market instead of the steam market, the
likelihood of being able to secure a longer-term sales
commitment by selling coal into the steam market and our
contractual commitments to deliver different types of coals to
our customers. A decline in the metallurgical market relative to
the steam market could cause us to shift coal from the
metallurgical market to the steam market, thereby reducing our
revenues and profitability.
Most of our metallurgical coal reserves possess quality
characteristics that enable us to mine, process and market them
as high quality steam coal. However, some of our mines operate
profitably only if all or a portion of their production is sold
as metallurgical coal to the steel market. If demand for
metallurgical coal declined to the point where we could earn a
more attractive return marketing the coal as steam coal, these
mines may not be economically viable and may be subject to
closure. Such closures would lead to accelerated reclamation
costs, as well as reduced revenue and profitability.
We face numerous uncertainties in estimating our economically
recoverable coal reserves, and inaccuracies in our estimates
could result in lower than expected revenues, higher than
expected costs or decreased profitability.
We base our reserve information on engineering, economic and
geological data assembled and analyzed by our staff, which
includes various engineers and geologists, and which is
periodically reviewed by outside firms. The reserves estimates
as to both quantity and quality are annually updated to reflect
production of coal from the reserves and new drilling or other
data received. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in
estimating quantities and qualities of and costs to mine
recoverable reserves, including many factors beyond our control.
Estimates of economically recoverable coal reserves and net cash
flows necessarily depend upon a number of variable factors and
assumptions, all of which may vary considerably from actual
results such as:
|
|
4 |
geological and mining conditions which may not be fully
identified by available exploration data or which may differ
from experience in current operations; |
|
4 |
historical production from the area compared with production
from other similar producing areas; and |
|
4 |
the assumed effects of regulation and taxes by governmental
agencies and assumptions concerning coal prices, operating
costs, mining technology improvements, severance and excise tax,
development costs and reclamation costs. |
For these reasons, estimates of the economically recoverable
quantities and qualities attributable to any particular group of
properties, classifications of reserves based on risk of
recovery and estimates of net cash flows expected from
particular reserves prepared by different engineers or by the
same engineers at different times may vary substantially. Actual
coal tonnage recovered from identified reserve areas or
properties and revenues and expenditures with respect to our
reserves may vary materially from estimates. These estimates
thus may not accurately reflect our actual reserves. Any
inaccuracy in our
17
Risk factors
estimates related to our reserves could result in lower than
expected revenues, higher than expected costs or decreased
profitability.
We depend heavily on a small number of large customers, the
loss of any of which would adversely affect our operating
results.
Our three largest customers for three months ended
March 31, 2005 were Georgia Power, Carolina
Power & Light and Duke Power and we derived
approximately 49% of our pro forma coal revenues from sales
to our five largest customers, pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions. At March 31, 2005 (pro forma for
the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions), we had 11 coal
supply agreements with these customers that expire at various
times from 2005 to 2014. We are currently discussing the
extension of existing agreements or entering into new long-term
agreements with some of these customers, but we cannot assure
you that these negotiations will be successful or that those
customers will continue to purchase coal from us without
long-term coal supply agreements. If a number of these customers
were to significantly reduce their purchases of coal from us, or
if we were unable to sell coal to them on terms as favorable to
us as the terms under our current agreements, our financial
condition and results of operations could suffer materially.
Disruptions in transportation services could limit our
ability to deliver coal to our customers.
We depend primarily upon railroads, trucks and barges to deliver
coal to our customers. Disruption of railroad service due to
weather-related problems, strikes, lockouts, and other events
could temporarily impair our ability to supply coal to our
customers, resulting in decreased shipments. Decreased
performance levels over longer periods of time could cause our
customers to look elsewhere for their fuel needs, negatively
affecting our revenues and profitability.
During 2004, the major eastern railroads (CSX and Norfolk
Southern) experienced significant service problems. These
problems were caused by an increase in overall rail traffic from
the expanding economy and shortages of both equipment and
personnel. The service problems had an adverse effect on our
shipments during several months in 2004. If these service
problems persist, they could have an adverse impact on our
financial results in 2005 and beyond.
The states of West Virginia and Kentucky have recently increased
enforcement of weight limits on coal trucks on its public roads.
Additionally, West Virginia legislation, which raised coal truck
weight limits in West Virginia, includes provisions supporting
enhanced enforcement. The legislation went into effect on
October 1, 2003 and implementation began on January 1,
2004. It is possible that other states in which our coal is
transported by truck could conduct similar campaigns to increase
enforcement of weight limits. Such stricter enforcement actions
could result in shipment delays and increased costs. An increase
in transportation costs could have an adverse effect on our
ability to increase or to maintain production and could
adversely affect revenues.
Some of our mines depend on a single transportation carrier or a
single mode of transportation. Disruption of any of these
transportation services due to weather-related problems,
mechanical difficulties, strikes, lockouts, bottlenecks, and
other events could temporarily impair our ability to supply coal
to our customers. Our transportation providers may face
difficulties in the future that may impair our ability to supply
coal to our customers, resulting in decreased revenues.
Currently, there is a shortage of available train cars to
service our coal operations in eastern Kentucky.
If there are disruptions of the transportation services provided
by our primary rail carriers that transport our produced coal
and we are unable to find alternative transportation providers
to ship our coal, our business could be adversely affected.
18
Risk factors
Fluctuations in transportation costs could reduce revenues by
causing us to reduce our production or impairing our ability to
supply coal to our customers.
Transportation costs represent a significant portion of the
total cost of coal for our customers and, as a result, the cost
of transportation is a critical factor in a customers
purchasing decision. Increases in transportation costs could
make coal a less competitive source of energy or could make our
coal production less competitive than coal produced from other
sources.
On the other hand, significant decreases in transportation costs
could result in increased competition from coal producers in
other parts of the country. For instance, coordination of the
many eastern loading facilities, the large number of small
shipments, the steeper average grades of the terrain and a more
unionized workforce are all issues that combine to make
shipments originating in the eastern United States inherently
more expensive on a per-mile basis than shipments originating in
the western United States. The increased competition could have
a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Disruption in supplies of coal produced by third parties
could temporarily impair our ability to fill our customers
orders or increase our costs.
In addition to marketing coal that is produced from our
controlled reserves, we purchase and resell coal produced by
third parties from their controlled reserves to meet customer
specifications. Disruption in our supply of third-party coal
could temporarily impair our ability to fill our customers
orders or require us to pay higher prices in order to obtain the
required coal from other sources. Any increase in the prices we
pay for third-party coal could increase our costs and therefore
lower our earnings.
Because our profitability is substantially dependent on the
availability of an adequate supply of coal reserves that can be
mined at competitive costs, the unavailability of these types of
reserves would cause our profitability to decline.
We have not yet applied for or obtained all of the permits
required, or developed the mines necessary, to use all of our
reserves. Furthermore, we may not be able to mine all of our
reserves as profitably as we do at our current operations. Our
planned development projects and acquisition activities may not
result in significant additional reserves and we may not have
continuing success developing new mines or expanding existing
mines beyond our existing reserve base. Most of our mining
operations are conducted on properties owned or leased by us.
Because title to most of our leased properties and mineral
rights is not thoroughly verified until a permit to mine the
property is obtained, our right to mine some of our reserves may
be materially adversely affected if defects in title or
boundaries exist. In addition, in order to develop our reserves,
we must receive various governmental permits. We may be unable
to obtain the permits necessary for us to operate profitably in
the future. Some of these permits are becoming increasingly more
difficult and expensive to obtain and the review process
continues to lengthen.
Our profitability depends substantially on our ability to mine
coal reserves that have the geological characteristics that
enable them to be mined at competitive costs and to meet the
quality needed by our customers. Because our reserves decline as
we mine our coal, our future success and growth depend, in part,
upon our ability to acquire additional coal reserves that are
economically recoverable. Replacement reserves may not be
available when required or, if available, may not be capable of
being mined at costs comparable to those characteristic of the
depleting mines. We may not be able to accurately assess the
geological characteristics of any reserves that we acquire,
which may adversely affect our profitability and financial
condition. Exhaustion of reserves at particular mines also may
have an adverse effect on our operating results that is
disproportionate to the percentage of overall
19
Risk factors
production represented by such mines. Our ability to obtain
other reserves in the future could be limited by restrictions
under our existing or future debt agreements, competition from
other coal companies for attractive properties, the lack of
suitable acquisition candidates or the inability to acquire coal
properties on commercially reasonable terms.
Unexpected increases in raw material costs could
significantly impair our operating results.
Our coal mining operations use significant amounts of steel,
petroleum products and other raw materials in various pieces of
mining equipment, supplies and materials, including the roof
bolts required by the room and pillar method of mining described
below. Scrap steel prices have risen significantly in recent
months, and historically, the prices of scrap steel and
petroleum have fluctuated. If the price of steel or other of
these materials increase, our operational expenses will
increase, which could have a significant negative impact on our
operating results.
A shortage of skilled labor in the mining industry could pose
a risk to achieving optimal labor productivity and competitive
costs, which could adversely affect our profitability.
Efficient coal mining using modern techniques and equipment
requires skilled laborers, preferably with at least a year of
experience and proficiency in multiple mining tasks. In order to
support our planned expansion opportunities, we intend to
sponsor both in-house and vocational coal mining programs at the
local level in order to train additional skilled laborers. In
the event the shortage of experienced labor continues or worsens
or we are unable to train the necessary amount of skilled
laborers, there could be an adverse impact on our labor
productivity and costs and our ability to expand production and
therefore have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations.
We have a new management team, and if they are unable to work
effectively together, our business may be harmed.
Most of our and ICG, Inc.s management team was hired in
2005, and the group has only been working together for a short
period of time. Moreover, several other key employees were hired
in 2005. Because many of our executive officers and key
employees are new and we also expect to add additional key
personnel in the near future, there is a risk that our
management team will not be able to work together effectively.
If our management team is unable to work together, our
operations could be disrupted and our business harmed.
Our ability to operate our company effectively could be
impaired if we fail to attract and retain key personnel.
Our senior management team averages 23 years of
experience in the coal industry, which includes developing
innovative, low-cost mining operations, maintaining strong
customer relationships and making strategic, opportunistic
acquisitions. The loss of any of our senior executives could
have a material adverse effect on our business. There may be a
limited number of persons with the requisite experience and
skills to serve in our senior management positions. We cannot
assure you that we would be able to locate or employ qualified
executives on acceptable terms. In addition, as our business
develops and expands, we believe that our future success will
depend greatly on our continued ability to attract and retain
highly skilled personnel with coal industry experience.
Competition for these persons in the coal industry is intense
and we may not be able to successfully recruit, train or retain
qualified personnel. We cannot assure you that we will continue
to employ key personnel or that we will be able to attract and
retain qualified personnel in the future. Our failure to retain
or attract key personnel could have a material adverse effect on
our operations.
20
Risk factors
Acquisitions that we may undertake involve a number of
inherent risks, any of which could cause us not to realize the
anticipated benefits.
We continually seek to expand our operations and coal reserves
through acquisitions. If we are unable to successfully integrate
the companies, businesses or properties we are able to acquire,
our profitability may decline and we could experience a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results
of operations. Acquisition transactions involve various inherent
risks, including:
|
|
4 |
uncertainties in assessing the value, strengths, and potential
profitability of, and identifying the extent of all weaknesses,
risks, contingent and other liabilities (including environmental
or mine safety liabilities) of, acquisition candidates; |
|
4 |
the potential loss of key customers, management and employees of
an acquired business; |
|
4 |
the ability to achieve identified operating and financial
synergies anticipated to result from an acquisition; |
|
4 |
problems that could arise from the integration of the acquired
business; and |
|
4 |
unanticipated changes in business, industry or general economic
conditions that affect the assumptions underlying our rationale
for pursuing the acquisition. |
Any one or more of these factors could cause us not to realize
the benefits anticipated to result from an acquisition. Any
acquisition opportunities we pursue could materially affect our
liquidity and capital resources and may require us to incur
indebtedness, seek equity capital or both. In addition, future
acquisitions could result in our assuming more long-term
liabilities relative to the value of the acquired assets than we
have assumed in our previous acquisitions.
We may not be able to effectively integrate Anker and
CoalQuest into our operations.
Our future success will depend largely on our ability to
consolidate and effectively integrate Ankers and
CoalQuests operations into our operations. We may not be
able to do so successfully without substantial costs, delays or
other difficulties. We may face significant challenges in
consolidating functions and integrating procedures, information
technology systems, personnel and operating philosophies in a
timely and efficient manner. The integration process is complex
and time consuming and may pose a number of obstacles, such as:
|
|
4 |
the loss of key employees or customers; |
|
4 |
the challenge of maintaining the quality of customer service; |
|
4 |
the need to coordinate geographically diverse operations; |
|
4 |
retooling and reprogramming of equipment and information
technology systems; and |
|
4 |
the resulting diversion of managements attention from our
day-to-day business and the need to hire and integrate
additional management personnel to manage our expanded
operations. |
If we are not successful in completing the integration of Anker
and CoalQuest into our operations, if the integration takes
longer or is more complex or expensive than anticipated, if we
cannot operate the Anker and CoalQuest businesses as effectively
as we anticipate, whether as a result of deficiency of the
acquired business or otherwise, or if the integrated businesses
fail to achieve market acceptance, our operating performance,
margins, sales and reputation could be materially adversely
affected.
21
Risk factors
If the value of our goodwill becomes impaired, the write-off
of the impaired portion could materially reduce the value of our
assets and reduce our net income for the year in which the
write-off occurs.
When we acquire a business, we record an asset called
goodwill if the amount we pay for the business,
including liabilities assumed, is in excess of the fair value of
the assets of the business we acquire. We recorded
$183.9 million of goodwill in connection with the Horizon
acquisition and will record goodwill in connection with the
Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions. Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, requires that goodwill be tested at
least annually (absent any impairment indicators). The testing
includes comparing the fair value of each reporting unit with
its carrying value. Fair value is determined using discounted
cash flows, market multiples and market capitalization.
Impairment adjustments, if any, generally are required to be
recognized as operating expenses. We cannot provide assurance
that we will not have future impairment adjustments to our
recorded goodwill. Any finding that the value of our goodwill
has been impaired would require us to write-off the impaired
portion, which could significantly reduce the value of our
assets and reduce our net income for the year in which the
write-off occurs.
Failure to obtain or renew surety bonds in a timely manner
and on acceptable terms could affect our ability to secure
reclamation and coal lease obligations, which could adversely
affect our ability to mine or lease coal.
Federal and state laws require us to obtain surety bonds to
secure payment of certain long-term obligations, such as mine
closure or reclamation costs, federal and state workers
compensation costs, coal leases and other obligations. These
bonds are typically renewable annually. Surety bond issuers and
holders may not continue to renew the bonds or may demand
additional collateral or other less favorable terms upon those
renewals. The ability of surety bond issuers and holders to
demand additional collateral or other less favorable terms has
increased as the number of companies willing to issue these
bonds has decreased over time. Our failure to maintain, or our
inability to acquire, surety bonds that are required by state
and federal law would affect our ability to secure reclamation
and coal lease obligations, which could adversely affect our
ability to mine or lease coal. That failure could result from a
variety of factors including, without limitation:
|
|
4 |
lack of availability, higher expense or unfavorable market terms
of new bonds; |
|
4 |
restrictions on availability of collateral for current and
future third-party surety bond issuers under the terms of our
credit facility; and |
|
4 |
the exercise by third-party surety bond issuers of their right
to refuse to renew the surety. |
Failure to maintain capacity for required letters of credit
could limit our ability to obtain or renew surety bonds.
At March 31, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions), we had $49.9 million of letters of credit in
place, of which $40.5 million serve as collateral for
reclamation surety bonds and $9.4 million secure
miscellaneous obligations. Included in the $40.5 million
letters of credit securing collateral for reclamation surety
bonds is a $10.0 million letter of credit related to
Lexington Coal Company. Our credit facility currently provides
for a $110.0 million revolving credit facility, of which up
to $60.0 million may be used for letters of credit. If we
do not maintain sufficient borrowing capacity under our
revolving credit facility for additional letters of credit, we
may be unable to obtain or renew surety bonds required for our
mining operations.
22
Risk factors
Our business requires substantial capital investment and
maintenance expenditures, which we may be unable to provide.
Our business strategy will require additional substantial
capital investment. We require capital for, among other
purposes, managing acquired assets, acquiring new equipment,
maintaining the condition of our existing equipment and
maintaining compliance with environmental laws and regulations.
To the extent that cash generated internally and cash available
under our credit facilities are not sufficient to fund capital
requirements, we will require additional debt and/or equity
financing. However, this type of financing may not be available
or, if available, may not be on satisfactory terms. Future debt
financings, if available, may result in increased interest and
amortization expense, increased leverage and decreased income
available to fund further acquisitions and expansion. In
addition, future debt financings may limit our ability to
withstand competitive pressures and render us more vulnerable to
economic downturns. If we fail to generate or obtain sufficient
additional capital in the future, we could be forced to reduce
or delay capital expenditures, sell assets or restructure or
refinance our indebtedness.
Our level of indebtedness and other demands on our cash
resources could materially adversely affect our ability to
execute our business strategy and make us more vulnerable to
economic downturns.
As of March 31, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions), we had cash of approximately $35.0 million
and total consolidated indebtedness, including current
maturities and capital lease obligations, of approximately
$216.7 million before application of the proceeds of this
offering. During 2005, our anticipated principal repayments will
be approximately $1.8 million on the term loan if the term
loan is not repaid with the proceeds of this offering. Subject
to the limits contained in our credit facilities, we may also
incur additional debt in the future. In addition to the
principal repayments on our outstanding debt, we have other
demands on our cash resources, including, among others, capital
expenditures and operating expenses.
Our credit facilities are secured by substantially all our
assets. If we default under these facilities, the lenders could
choose to declare all outstanding amounts immediately due and
payable, and seek foreclosure of the assets we granted to them
as collateral. If the amounts outstanding under the credit
facilities were accelerated, we may not have sufficient
resources to repay all outstanding amounts, and our assets may
not be sufficient to repay all of our outstanding debt in full.
Foreclosures on any of our material assets could disrupt our
operations, and have a material adverse effect on our
reputation, production volume, sales and earnings.
Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate
risk, which could cause our annual debt service obligations to
increase significantly.
Our borrowings under our credit facilities are at variable rates
of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. If interest
rates increase, our debt service obligations on our variable
rate indebtedness would increase even if the amount borrowed
remained the same, resulting in a decrease in our net income. We
have developed a hedging program to actively manage the risks
associated with interest rate fluctuations but our program may
not effectively eliminate all of the financial exposure
associated with interest rate fluctuations. We currently have
instruments in place that have the effect of fixing the interest
rate on a portion of our outstanding debt for various time
periods up to two years.
23
Risk factors
Increased consolidation and competition in the U.S. coal
industry may adversely affect our ability to sell coal.
During the last several years, the U.S. coal industry has
experienced increased consolidation, which has contributed to
the industry becoming more competitive. According to the EIA, in
1995, the top ten coal producers accounted for approximately 50%
of total domestic coal production. By 2003, however, the top ten
coal producers share had increased to approximately 63% of
total domestic coal production. Consequently, many of our
competitors in the domestic coal industry are major coal
producers who have significantly greater financial resources
than us. The intense competition among coal producers may impact
our ability to retain or attract customers and may therefore
adversely affect our future revenues and profitability.
The demand for U.S. coal exports is dependent upon a number
of factors outside of our control, including the overall demand
for electricity in foreign markets, currency exchange rates,
ocean freight rates, the demand for foreign-produced steel both
in foreign markets and in the U.S. market (which is
dependent in part on tariff rates on steel), general economic
conditions in foreign countries, technological developments and
environmental and other governmental regulations. If foreign
demand for U.S. coal were to decline, this decline could
cause competition among coal producers in the United States to
intensify, potentially resulting in additional downward pressure
on domestic coal prices.
Our ability to collect payments from our customers could be
impaired if their creditworthiness deteriorates.
Our ability to receive payment for coal sold and delivered
depends on the continued creditworthiness of our customers. Our
customer base is changing with deregulation as utilities sell
their power plants to their non-regulated affiliates or third
parties that may be less creditworthy, thereby increasing the
risk we bear on payment default. These new power plant owners
may have credit ratings that are below investment grade. In
addition, competition with other coal suppliers could force us
to extend credit to customers and on terms that could increase
the risk we bear on payment default.
We have contracts to supply coal to energy trading and brokering
companies under which those companies sell coal to end users.
During 2004 and continuing in 2005, the creditworthiness of the
energy trading and brokering companies with which we do business
declined, increasing the risk that we may not be able to collect
payment for all coal sold and delivered to or on behalf of these
energy trading and brokering companies.
Defects in title or loss of any leasehold interests in our
properties could limit our ability to mine these properties or
result in significant unanticipated costs.
We conduct a significant part of our mining operations on
properties that we lease. A title defect or the loss of any
lease could adversely affect our ability to mine the associated
reserves. Title to most of our leased properties and mineral
rights is not usually verified until we make a commitment to
develop a property, which may not occur until after we have
obtained necessary permits and completed exploration of the
property. Our right to mine some of our reserves has in the past
been, and may again in the future be, adversely affected if
defects in title or boundaries exist. In order to obtain leases
or mining contracts to conduct our mining operations on property
where these defects exist, we may in the future have to incur
unanticipated costs. In addition, we may not be able to
successfully negotiate new leases or mining contracts for
properties containing additional reserves, or maintain our
leasehold interests in properties where we have not commenced
mining operations during the term of the lease. Some leases have
minimum production requirements. Failure to meet those
requirements could result in losses of prepaid royalties and, in
some rare cases, could result in a loss of the lease itself.
24
Risk factors
Our work force could become unionized in the future, which
could adversely affect the stability of our production and
reduce our profitability.
All of our coal production is from mines operated by union-free
employees. However, our subsidiaries employees have the
right at any time under the National Labor Relations Act to form
or affiliate with a union. If the terms of a union collective
bargaining agreement are significantly different from our
current compensation arrangements with our employees, any
unionization of our subsidiaries employees could adversely
affect the stability of our production and reduce our
profitability.
Our ability and the ability of some of our subsidiaries to
engage in some business transactions may be limited by the terms
of our debt.
Our credit facilities contain a number of financial covenants
requiring us to meet financial ratios and financial condition
tests, as well as covenants restricting our ability to:
|
|
4 |
incur additional debt; |
|
4 |
pay dividends on, redeem or repurchase capital stock; |
|
4 |
allow our subsidiaries to issue new stock to any person other
than us or any of our other subsidiaries; |
|
4 |
make investments; |
|
4 |
make acquisitions; |
|
4 |
incur or permit to exist liens; |
|
4 |
enter into transactions with affiliates; |
|
4 |
guarantee the debt of other entities, including joint ventures; |
|
4 |
merge or consolidate or otherwise combine with another
company; and |
|
4 |
transfer or sell a material amount of our assets outside the
ordinary course of business. |
These covenants could adversely affect our ability to finance
our future operations or capital needs or to execute preferred
business strategies.
Additionally, our ability to borrow under our credit facilities
will depend upon our ability to comply with these covenants and
our borrowing base requirements. Our ability to meet these
covenants and requirements may be affected by events beyond our
control and we may not meet these obligations. Our failure to
comply with these covenants and requirements could result in an
event of default under our credit facilities that, if not cured
or waived, could terminate our ability to borrow further, permit
acceleration of the relevant debt and permit foreclosure on any
collateral granted as security under our credit facilities. If
our indebtedness is accelerated, we may not be able to repay our
debt or borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. Even if we were
able to obtain new financing, it may not be on commercially
reasonable terms, on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.
If our debt is in default for any reason, our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
See Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations Liquidity and capital
resources and Note 6 to our audited consolidated
financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
25
Risk factors
If our business does not generate sufficient cash for
operations, we may not be able to repay our indebtedness.
Our ability to pay principal and interest on and to refinance
our debt depends upon the operating performance of our
subsidiaries, which will be affected by, among other things,
general economic, financial, competitive, legislative,
regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond our
control. In particular, economic conditions could cause the
price of coal to fall, our revenue to decline, and hamper our
ability to repay our indebtedness.
Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from
operations and future borrowings may not be available to us
under our new credit facility or otherwise in an amount
sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our
other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion
of our indebtedness on or before maturity. We may not be able to
refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable
terms, on terms acceptable to us or at all.
RISKS RELATING TO GOVERNMENT REGULATION
The government extensively regulates our mining operations,
which imposes significant costs on us, and future regulations
could increase those costs or limit our ability to produce and
sell coal.
The coal mining industry is subject to increasingly strict
regulation by federal, state and local authorities with respect
to matters such as:
|
|
4 |
limitations on land use; |
|
4 |
employee health and safety; |
|
4 |
mandated benefits for retired coal miners; |
|
4 |
mine permitting and licensing requirements; |
|
4 |
reclamation and restoration of mining properties after mining is
completed; |
|
4 |
air quality standards; |
|
4 |
water pollution; |
|
4 |
protection of human health, plantlife and wildlife; |
|
4 |
the discharge of materials into the environment; |
|
4 |
surface subsidence from underground mining; and |
|
4 |
the effects of mining on groundwater quality and availability. |
In particular, federal and state statutes require us to restore
mine property in accordance with specific standards and an
approved reclamation plan, and require that we obtain and
periodically renew permits for mining operations. If we do not
make adequate provisions for all expected reclamation and other
costs associated with mine closures, it could harm our future
operating results. In addition, state and federal regulations
impose strict standards for particulate matter emissions which
may restrict our ability to develop new mines or could require
us to modify our existing operations and increase our costs of
doing business.
Federal and state safety and health regulation in the coal
mining industry may be the most comprehensive and pervasive
system for protection of employee safety and health affecting
any segment of the U.S. industry. It is costly and
time-consuming to comply with these requirements and new
regulations or orders may materially adversely affect our mining
operations or cost structure, any of which could harm our future
results.
Under federal law, each coal mine operator must secure payment
of federal black lung benefits to claimants who are current and
former employees and contribute to a trust fund for the payment
of
26
Risk factors
benefits and medical expenses to claimants who last worked in
the coal industry before July 1973. The trust fund is funded by
an excise tax on coal production. If this tax increases, or if
we could no longer pass it on to the purchaser of our coal under
many of our long-term sales contracts, it could increase our
operating costs and harm our results. New regulations that took
effect in 2001 could significantly increase our costs with
contesting and paying black lung claims. If new laws or
regulations increase the number and award size of claims, it
could substantially harm our business.
The costs, liabilities and requirements associated with these
and other regulations may be costly and time-consuming and may
delay commencement or continuation of exploration or production
operations. Failure to comply with these regulations may result
in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal
penalties, the imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs
and liens, the issuance of injunctions to limit or cease
operations, the suspension or revocation of permits and other
enforcement measures that could have the effect of limiting
production from our operations. We may also incur costs and
liabilities resulting from claims for damages to property or
injury to persons arising from our operations. We must
compensate employees for work-related injuries. If we do not
make adequate provisions for our workers compensation
liabilities, it could harm our future operating results. If we
are pursued for these sanctions, costs and liabilities, our
mining operations and, as a result, our profitability could be
adversely affected. See Environmental and other regulatory
matters.
The possibility exists that new legislation and/or regulations
and orders may be adopted that may materially adversely affect
our mining operations, our cost structure and/or our
customers ability to use coal. New legislation or
administrative regulations (or new judicial interpretations or
administrative enforcement of existing laws and regulations),
including proposals related to the protection of the environment
that would further regulate and tax the coal industry, may also
require us or our customers to change operations significantly
or incur increased costs. These regulations, if proposed and
enacted in the future, could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.
Mining in Northern and Central Appalachia is more complex and
involves more regulatory constraints than mining in the other
areas, which could affect the mining operations and cost
structures of these areas.
The geological characteristics of Northern and Central
Appalachian coal reserves, such as depth of overburden and coal
seam thickness, make them complex and costly to mine. As mines
become depleted, replacement reserves may not be available when
required or, if available, may not be capable of being mined at
costs comparable to those characteristic of the depleting mines.
In addition, as compared to mines in the Powder River Basin,
permitting, licensing and other environmental and regulatory
requirements are more costly and time-consuming to satisfy.
These factors could materially adversely affect the mining
operations and cost structures of, and customers ability
to use coal produced by, our mines in Northern and Central
Appalachia.
Judicial rulings that restrict how we may dispose of mining
wastes could significantly increase our operating costs,
discourage customers from purchasing our coal, and materially
harm our financial condition and operating results.
In our surface mining operations, we use mountaintop removal
mining wherever feasible because it allows us to recover more
tons of coal per acre and facilitates the permitting of larger
projects, which allows mining to continue over a longer period
of time than would be the case using other mining methods. To
dispose of mining waste generated by mountaintop removal
operations, as well as other mining operations, we obtain
permits to construct and operate valley fills and surface
impoundments. Some of these permits are nationwide
permits (as opposed to individual permits) issued by the Army
Corps of Engineers, or ACOE, for dredging and filling in streams
and wetlands. Lawsuits challenging ACOEs authority to
issue Nationwide Permit 21 have been instituted by
environmental groups. In
27
Risk factors
2004, a federal court issued an order enjoining ACOE from
issuing further Nationwide 21 permits in the South District
of West Virginia. This decision is being appealed. A similar
lawsuit has been filed in federal court in Kentucky, which seeks
to invalidate the ACOE issuance of Nationwide Permit 21 and
enjoin ACOE from allowing pursuant to this permit further
discharges into valley fills or surface impoundments from 54
mines in Kentucky, including some of our mines. We cannot
predict the final outcomes of these lawsuits. If mining methods
at issue are limited or prohibited, it could significantly
increase our operational costs, make it more difficult to
economically recover a significant portion of our reserves and
lead to a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operation. We may not be able to increase the price
we charge for coal to cover higher production costs without
reducing customer demand for our coal.
We may be unable to obtain and renew permits necessary for
our operations, which would reduce our production, cash flow and
profitability.
Mining companies must obtain numerous permits that impose strict
regulations on various environmental and safety matters in
connection with coal mining. These include permits issued by
various federal and state agencies and regulatory bodies. The
permitting rules are complex and may change over time, making
our ability to comply with the applicable requirements more
difficult or even impossible, thereby precluding continuing or
future mining operations. Private individuals and the public
have certain rights to comment upon and otherwise engage in the
permitting process, including through court intervention.
Accordingly, the permits we need may not be issued, maintained
or renewed, or may not be issued or renewed in a timely fashion,
or may involve requirements that restrict our ability to conduct
our mining operations. An inability to conduct our mining
operations pursuant to applicable permits would reduce our
production, cash flow, and profitability.
We have significant reclamation and mine closure obligations.
If the assumption underlying our accruals are materially
inaccurate, we could be required to expend greater amounts than
anticipated.
The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, or
SMCRA, establishes operational, reclamation and closure
standards for all aspects of surface mining as well as most
aspects of deep mining. Estimates of our total reclamation and
mine-closing liabilities are based upon permit requirements and
our engineering expertise related to these requirements. The
estimate of ultimate reclamation liability is reviewed
periodically by our management and engineers. The estimated
liability can change significantly if actual costs vary from
assumptions or if governmental regulations change significantly.
We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations (Statement No. 143) effective
January 1, 2003. Statement No. 143 requires that
retirement obligations be recorded as a liability based on fair
value, which is calculated as the present value of the estimated
future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, we
considered the estimated current cost of reclamation and applied
inflation rates and a third-party profit, as necessary. The
third-party profit is an estimate of the approximate markup that
would be charged by contractors for work performed on behalf of
us. The resulting estimated liability could change significantly
if actual amounts change significantly from our assumptions.
Our operations may substantially impact the environment or
cause exposure to hazardous substances, and our properties may
have significant environmental contamination, any of which could
result in material liabilities to us.
We use, and in the past have used, hazardous materials and
generate, and in the past have generated, hazardous wastes. In
addition, many of the locations that we own or operate were used
for coal mining and/or involved hazardous materials usage either
before or after we were involved with those locations. We may be
subject to claims under federal and state statutes, and/or
common law doctrines, for toxic torts, natural resource damages,
and other damages as well as the investigation and clean up
28
Risk factors
of soil, surface water, groundwater, and other media. Such
claims may arise, for example, out of current or former
activities at sites that we own or operate currently, as well as
at sites that we or predecessor entities owned or operated in
the past, and at contaminated sites that have always been owned
or operated by third parties. Our liability for such claims may
be joint and several, so that we may be held responsible for
more than our share of the remediation costs or other damages,
or even for the entire share. We have from time to time been
subject to claims arising out of contamination at our own and
other facilities and may incur such liabilities in the future.
Mining operations can also impact flows and water quality in
surface water bodies and remedial measures may be required, such
as lining of stream beds, to prevent or minimize such impacts.
We are currently involved with state environmental authorities
concerning impacts or alleged impacts of our mining operations
on water flows in several surface streams. We are studying, or
addressing, those impacts and we have not finally resolved those
matters. Many of our mining operations take place in the
vicinity of streams, and similar impacts could be asserted or
identified at other streams in the future. The costs of our
efforts at the streams we are currently addressing, and at any
other streams that may be identified in the future, could be
significant.
We maintain extensive coal slurry impoundments at a number of
our mines. Such impoundments are subject to regulation. Slurry
impoundments maintained by other coal mining operations have
been known to fail, releasing large volumes of coal slurry.
Structural failure of an impoundment can result in extensive
damage to the environment and natural resources, such as bodies
of water that the coal slurry reaches, as well as liability for
related personal injuries and property damages, and injuries to
wildlife. Some of our impoundments overlie mined out areas,
which can pose a heightened risk of failure and of damages
arising out of failure. We have commenced measures to modify our
method of operation at one surface impoundment containing slurry
wastes in order to reduce the risk of releases to the
environment from it, a process that will take several years to
complete. If one of our impoundments were to fail, we could be
subject to substantial claims for the resulting environmental
contamination and associated liability, as well as for fines and
penalties.
These and other impacts that our operations may have on the
environment, as well as exposures to hazardous substances or
wastes associated with our operations and environmental
conditions at our properties, could result in costs and
liabilities that would materially and adversely affect us.
Extensive environmental regulations affect our customers and
could reduce the demand for coal as a fuel source and cause our
sales to decline.
The Clean Air Act and similar state and local laws extensively
regulate the amount of sulfur dioxide, particulate matter,
nitrogen oxides, and other compounds emitted into the air from
coke ovens and electric power plants, which are the largest
end-users of our coal. Such regulations will require significant
emissions control expenditures for many coal-fired power plants
to comply with applicable ambient air quality standards. As a
result, these generators may switch to other fuels that generate
less of these emissions, possibly reducing future demand for
coal and the construction of coal-fired power plants.
The Federal Clean Air Act, including the Clean Air Act
Amendments of 1990 and corresponding state laws that regulate
emissions of materials into the air affect coal mining
operations both directly and indirectly. Measures intended to
improve air quality that reduce coals share of the
capacity for power generation could diminish our revenues and
harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations. The price of higher sulfur coal may decrease as more
coal-fired utility power plants install additional pollution
control equipment to comply with stricter sulfur dioxide
emission limits, which may reduce our revenues and harm our
results. In addition, regulatory initiatives including the
nitrogen oxide rules, new ozone and particulate matter
standards, regional haze regulations, new source review,
regulation of mercury emissions, and legislation or regulations
that establish restrictions on greenhouse
29
Risk factors
gas emissions or provide for other multiple pollutant reductions
could make coal a less attractive fuel to our utility customers
and substantially reduce our sales.
Various new and proposed laws and regulations may require
further reductions in emissions from coal-fired utilities. For
example, under the Clean Air Interstate Rule issued in March
2005, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, has
further regulated sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides from
coal-fired power plants. Among other things, in affected states,
the rule mandates reductions in sulfur dioxide emissions by
approximately 45% below 2003 levels by 2010, and by
approximately 57% below 2003 levels by 2015. The stringency of
this cap may require many coal-fired sources to install
additional pollution control equipment, such as wet scrubbers.
Installation of additional pollution control equipment required
by this proposed rule could result in a decrease in the demand
for low sulfur coal (because sulfur would be removed by the new
equipment), potentially driving down prices for low sulfur coal.
In March 2005, the EPA also adopted the Clean Air Mercury Rule
to control mercury emissions from power plants, which could
require coal-fired power plants to install new pollution
controls or comply with a mandatory, declining cap on the total
mercury emissions allowed from coal-fired power plants
nationwide. These and other future standards could have the
effect of making the operation of coal-fired plants less
profitable, thereby decreasing demand for coal. The majority of
our coal supply agreements contain provisions that allow a
purchaser to terminate its contract if legislation is passed
that either restricts the use or type of coal permissible at the
purchasers plant or results in specified increases in the
cost of coal or its use.
There have been several recent proposals in Congress, including
the Clear Skies Initiative, that are designed to further reduce
emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and mercury from
power plants, and certain ones could regulate additional air
pollutants. If such initiatives are enacted into law, power
plant operators could choose fuel sources other than coal to
meet their requirements, thereby reducing the demand for coal.
A regional haze program initiated by the EPA to protect and to
improve visibility at and around national parks, national
wilderness areas and international parks restricts the
construction of new coal-fired power plants whose operation may
impair visibility at and around federally protected areas, and
may require some existing coal-fired power plants to install
additional control measures designed to limit haze-causing
emissions.
One major by-product of burning coal is carbon dioxide, which is
considered a greenhouse gas and is a major source of concern
with respect to global warming. The Kyoto Protocol to the 1992
Framework Convention on Global Climate Change, which establishes
a binding set of emission targets for greenhouse gases, became
binding on ratifying countries on February 16, 2005. Four
industrialized nations have refused to ratify the Kyoto
Protocol Australia, Liechtenstein, Monaco and the United
States. Although the targets vary from country to country, if
the United States were to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, our nation
would be required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 93% of
1990 levels in a series of phased reductions from 2008 to 2012.
Future regulation of greenhouse gases in the United States could
occur pursuant to future U.S. treaty obligations, statutory
or regulatory changes under the Clean Air Act, or otherwise. The
Bush Administration has proposed a package of voluntary emission
reductions for greenhouse gases which provide for certain
incentives if targets are met. Some states, such as
Massachusetts, have already issued regulations regulating
greenhouse gas emissions from large power plants. Further, in
2002, the Conference of New England Governors and Eastern
Canadian Premiers adopted a Climate Change Action Plan, calling
for reduction in regional greenhouse emissions to 1990 levels by
2010, and a further reduction of at least 10% below 1990 levels
by 2020. Increased efforts to control greenhouse gas emissions,
including the future ratification of the Kyoto Protocol by the
United States, could result in reduced demand for our coal. See
Environmental and other regulatory matters for a
discussion of these and other regulations affecting our business.
30
Risk factors
RISKS RELATING TO OUR COMMON STOCK AND THIS OFFERING
Implementation of required public company corporate
governance and financial reporting practices and policies will
increase our costs, and we may be unable to provide the required
financial information in a timely and reliable manner.
Our current operations consist primarily of the assets of our
predecessor, Horizon, and the Anker and CoalQuest businesses
that we have acquired, each of which had different historical
operating, financial, accounting and other systems. Due to our
rapid growth and limited history operating our acquired
operations as an integrated business, and our internal controls
and procedures do not currently meet all the standards
applicable to public companies, including those contemplated by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as
rules and regulations enacted by the Securities and Exchange
Commission and The New York Stock Exchange. Areas of deficiency
in our internal controls requiring improvement include
documentation of controls and procedures, insufficient
experience in public company accounting and periodic reporting
matters among our financial and accounting staff.
Our management may not be able to effectively and timely
implement controls and procedures that adequately respond to the
increased regulatory compliance and reporting requirements that
will be applicable to us as a public company. If we are not able
to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely
manner or with adequate compliance, our independent auditors may
not be able to attest to the adequacy of our internal controls
over financial reporting. This result may subject us to adverse
regulatory consequences, and there could also be a negative
reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in
the reliability of our financial statements. We could also
suffer a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial
statements if our auditors report a material weakness in our
internal controls. In addition, if we fail to develop and
maintain effective controls and procedures, we may be unable to
provide the required financial information in a timely and
reliable manner or otherwise comply with the standards
applicable to us as a public company. Any failure by us to
timely provide the required financial information could
materially and adversely impact our financial condition and the
market value of our securities.
We will incur incremental costs not reflected in our historical
financial statements as a result of these increased regulatory
compliance and reporting requirements, including increased
auditing and legal fees. We also will need to hire additional
accounting and administrative staff with experience managing
public companies. Moreover, the standards that will be
applicable to us as a public company after this offering could
make it more difficult and expensive for us to attract and
retain qualified members of our board of directors and qualified
executive officers. We also anticipate that the regulations
related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will make it more difficult
and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer
liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced
coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage.
Our stock price may be extremely volatile, and you may not be
able to resell your shares at or above the public offering
price.
There has been significant volatility in the market price and
trading volume of equity securities, which is unrelated to the
financial performance of the companies issuing the securities.
These broad market fluctuations may negatively affect the market
price of our common stock. The public offering price for the
shares of common stock being sold in this offering will be
determined by negotiations between the representative of the
underwriters and us and may not be indicative of prices that
will prevail in the open market following this offering. You may
not be able to resell your shares at or above the public
offering price due to fluctuations in the market price of our
common stock caused by changes in our operating performance or
prospects and other factors.
Some specific factors that may have a significant effect on our
common stock market price include:
|
|
4 |
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results or
future prospects; |
31
Risk factors
|
|
4 |
the publics reaction to our press releases, our other
public announcements and our filings with the SEC; |
|
4 |
strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions
or restructurings; |
|
4 |
new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws
or regulations applicable to our business; |
|
4 |
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles; |
|
4 |
conditions of the coal industry as a result of changes in
financial markets or general economic conditions, including
those resulting from war, incidents of terrorism and responses
to such events; |
|
4 |
sales of common stock by us or members of our management
team; and |
|
4 |
changes in stock market analyst recommendations or earnings
estimates regarding our common stock, other comparable companies
or the coal industry generally. |
Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for
our common stock. We cannot predict the extent to which investor
interest in our company will lead to the development of an
active trading market on The New York Stock Exchange or
otherwise or how liquid that market might become. If an active
trading market does not develop, you may have difficulty selling
any of our common stock that you buy. Consequently, you may not
be able to sell our common stock at prices equal to or greater
than the price you paid in this offering.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and
Delaware corporate law may make it difficult for our
stockholders to replace or remove our current board of directors
and could deter or delay third-parties from acquiring us, which
may adversely affect the marketability and market price of our
common stock.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws and in Delaware corporate law may make
it difficult for stockholders to change the composition of our
board of directors in any one year, and thus prevent them from
changing the composition of management. In addition, the same
provisions may make it difficult and expensive for a third-party
to pursue a tender offer, change in control or takeover attempt
that is opposed by our management and board of directors. Public
stockholders who might desire to participate in this type of
transaction may not have an opportunity to do so. These
anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability
of public stockholders to benefit from a change in control or
change our management and board of directors and, as a result,
may adversely affect the marketability and market price of our
common stock.
We are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Under
these provisions, if anyone becomes an interested
stockholder, we may not enter into a business
combination with that person for three years without
special approval, which could discourage a third party from
making a takeover offer and could delay or prevent a change of
control. For purposes of Section 203, interested
stockholder means, generally, someone owning more than 15%
or more of our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate of ours
that owned 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock during
the past three years, subject to certain exceptions as described
in Section 203.
Under any change of control, the lenders under our credit
facilities would have the right to require us to repay all of
our outstanding obligations under the facility.
You will incur immediate and substantial dilution as a result
of this offering.
Investors purchasing shares of our common stock in this offering
will incur immediate and substantial dilution in net tangible
book value per share because the price that new investors pay
will be substantially greater than the net tangible book value
per share of the shares acquired. This dilution is due in large
part to the fact that our existing investors paid substantially
less than the public offering
32
Risk factors
price of the shares of common stock being sold in this offering
when they purchased their shares. To the extent that we raise
additional capital by issuing equity security or shares of our
common stock are issued upon the exercise of stock options or
under the restricted stock plan we intend to adopt prior to the
consummation of this offering, investors may experience
additional substantial dilution.
There may be circumstances in which the interests of our
major stockholders could be in conflict with your interests as a
stockholder.
Funds sponsored by WLR will own
approximately %
of our common stock on a fully consolidated basis following the
completion of the offering and after giving effect to the Anker
and CoalQuest acquisitions, assuming no exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option. Circumstances may
occur in which WLR or other major investors may have an interest
in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures or other transactions,
including among other things, taking advantage of certain
corporate opportunities that, in their judgment, could enhance
their investment in us or another company in which they invest.
These transactions might invoke risks to our other holders of
common stock or adversely affect us or other investors,
including investors who purchase common stock in this offering.
We may from time to time engage in transactions with related
parties and affiliates that include, among other things,
business arrangements, lease arrangements for certain coal
reserves and the payment of fees or commissions for the transfer
of coal reserves by one operating company to another. These
transactions, if any, may adversely affect our sales volumes,
margins and earnings.
If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common
stock following this offering, the market price of our common
stock may decline.
Sales of shares of our common stock in the public market
following this offering, or the perception that these sales may
occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to
decline. After this offering, our corporate reorganization and
after giving effect to the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions, we
will have
approximately shares
of common stock outstanding. The number of shares of common
stock available for sale in the public market is limited by
restrictions under federal securities law and under lock-up
agreements that our directors, executive officers and certain
holders of our common stock have entered into with the
underwriters and with us. Those lock-up agreements restrict
these persons from selling, pledging or otherwise disposing of
their shares for a period of 180 days after the date of
this prospectus without the prior written consent of UBS
Securities LLC. However, UBS Securities LLC, may release all or
any portion of the common stock from the restrictions of the
lock-up agreements. These sales might make it difficult or
impossible for us to sell additional securities if we need to
raise capital. All of the shares sold in this offering, as well
as of
the shares to be issued by us in the corporate reorganization to
the holders of ICG, Inc. common stock, will be freely tradable
without restrictions or further registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except for any shares held
by our affiliates, as defined in Rule 144 of the Securities
Act. The remaining shares of common stock outstanding after this
offering, including those issued to former Anker stockholders
and CoalQuest members, will be available for sale into the
public market at various times in the future. Additional shares
of common stock underlying options to be granted will become
available for sale in the public market. We expect to file
registration statements on Form S-8 that will register up
to shares
of common stock covering the shares of common stock to be issued
pursuant to the exercise of options expected to be granted under
our employee stock option plan.
In addition, under a registration rights agreement that we
entered into with certain of our existing stockholders, certain
of our stockholders have demand and
piggyback registration rights in connection with
this offering and future offerings of our common stock.
Demand rights enable the holders to demand that
their shares of common stock be registered and may require us to
file a registration statement under the Securities Act at our
expense. Piggyback rights require us to provide
33
Risk factors
notice to the relevant holders of our stock if we propose to
register any of our securities under the Securities Act and
grant such holders the right to include their shares in our
registration statement. None of our stockholders have exercised
their registration rights in connection with this offering. We
will also grant piggyback registration rights to the
former Anker and CoalQuest holders who will receive shares of
our common stock at the closing of the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions. As restrictions on resale end, our stock price
could drop significantly if the holders of these restricted
shares sell them or the market perceives they intend to sell
them. These sales may also make it more difficult for us to sell
securities in the future at a time and at a price we deem
appropriate.
The requirements of being a public company may strain our
resources and distract management.
As a public company, we will be subject to the reporting
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These requirements may place a strain on our
people, systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires that we
file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our
business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and
procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. In
order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over
financial reporting, significant resources and management
oversight will be required. This may divert managements
attention from other business concerns. Upon consummation of
this offering, our costs will increase as a result of having to
comply with the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and The New
York Stock Exchange listing requirements, which will require us,
among other things, to establish an internal audit function. We
may not be able to do so in a timely fashion or without
incurring material costs.
We may not pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
We may retain any future earnings to support the development and
expansion of our business or make additional payments under our
credit facilities and, as a result, we may not pay cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. Our payment of any future
dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors
after taking into account various factors, including our
financial condition, operating results, cash needs, growth plans
and the terms of any credit agreements that we may be a party to
at the time. Our credit facilities limit us from paying cash
dividends or other payments or distributions with respect to our
capital stock in excess of certain limitations. In addition, the
terms of any future credit agreement may contain similar
restrictions on our ability to pay any dividends or make any
distributions or payments with respect to our capital stock.
Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their common stock
after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way
to realize their investment.
34
Special note regarding forward-looking statements
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are not
statements of historical fact and may involve a number of risks
and uncertainties. We have used the words
anticipate, believe, could,
estimate, expect, intend,
may, plan, predict,
project and similar terms and phrases, including
references to assumptions, in this prospectus to identify
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are
made based on expectations and beliefs concerning future events
affecting us and are subject to uncertainties and factors
relating to our operations and business environment, all of
which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our
control, that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from those matters expressed in or implied by these
forward-looking statements. The following factors are among
those that may cause actual results to differ materially from
our forward-looking statements:
|
|
4 |
market demand for coal, electricity and steel; |
|
4 |
availability of qualified workers; |
|
4 |
future economic or capital market conditions; |
|
4 |
weather conditions or catastrophic weather-related damage; |
|
4 |
our production capabilities; |
|
4 |
our consummation of the corporate reorganization and the Anker
and CoalQuest acquisitions and the integration of these
businesses; |
|
4 |
the consummation of financing, acquisition or disposition
transactions and the effect thereof on our business; |
|
4 |
our plans and objectives for future operations and expansion or
consolidation; |
|
4 |
our relationships with, and other conditions affecting, our
customers; |
|
4 |
timing of reductions or increases in customer coal inventories; |
|
4 |
long-term coal supply arrangements; |
|
4 |
risks in coal mining; |
|
4 |
unexpected maintenance and equipment failure; |
|
4 |
environmental laws and regulations, including those directly
affecting our coal mining and production, and those affecting
our customers coal usage; |
|
4 |
competition; |
|
4 |
railroad, barge, trucking and other transportation performance
and costs; |
|
4 |
employee benefits costs and labor relations issues; |
|
4 |
our assumptions concerning economically recoverable coal reserve
estimates; |
|
4 |
regulatory and court decisions; |
|
4 |
future legislation and changes in regulations or governmental
policies or changes in interpretations thereof; |
|
4 |
the impairment of the value of our goodwill; and |
|
4 |
our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition. |
35
Special note regarding forward-looking statements
You should keep in mind that any forward-looking statement made
by us in this prospectus speaks only as of the date on which we
make it. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time,
and it is impossible for us to predict these events or how they
may affect us. We have no duty to, and do not intend to, update
or revise the forward-looking statements in this prospectus
after the date of this prospectus, except as may be required by
law. In light of these risks and uncertainties, you should keep
in mind that any forward-looking statement made in this
prospectus or elsewhere might not occur.
Industry data
In this prospectus, we rely on and refer to information
regarding the coal industry in the United States from the
U.S. Department of Energy, or DOE, the U.S. Energy
Information Administration, or EIA, the National Mining
Association, or NMA, the National Energy Technology Laboratory,
or NETL, the Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bloomberg L.P.
These organizations are not affiliated with us. They are not
aware of and have not consented to being named in this
prospectus. We believe that this information is reliable. In
addition, in many cases we have made statements in this
prospectus regarding our industry and our position in the
industry based on our experience in the industry and our own
investigation of market conditions. We have made determinations
based on publicly available information of production by
competitors and our internal estimates of competitors
production based on discussions with industry participants.
Statements relating to our leadership in safety and
environmental performance are based on our receipt of numerous
awards from state and federal agencies, including awards from
the Mine Safety and Health Administration, or MSHA, the
principal federal agency regulating health and safety in the
coal mining industry, and the Office of Surface Mining, the
principal federal agency regulating environmental performance in
the coal mining industry.
Price range of ICG, Inc. common stock
The following table shows, for the quarterly periods indicated,
the high and low quotes at the end of the day for the shares of
the common stock of ICG, Inc. as reported on the Pink Sheets
Electronic Quotation Service. Certain of the shares of ICG, Inc.
were issued to former creditors of Horizon in a transaction
exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for
our common stock. These quotes are provided solely for
informational purposes and are not necessarily representative of
trading prices in a public trading market nor of any price at
which the shares of common stock purchased in this offering may
trade in the future. See Risk FactorsRisks relating
to our common stock and this offeringOur stock price may
be extremely volatile and you may not be able to resell your
shares at or above the public offering price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price | |
|
Average | |
|
|
| |
|
Daily | |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Volume(1) | |
| |
November 15, 2004 through December 31,
2004(2)
|
|
$ |
14.50 |
|
|
$ |
7.63 |
|
|
|
673,493 |
|
January 1, 2005 through March 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
$ |
12.13 |
|
|
|
224,952 |
|
April 1, 2005 through May 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
$ |
12.60 |
|
|
|
94,266 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Does not include days on which there were no quotes for the
shares of the ICG, Inc. common stock. |
|
(2) |
Quotes for the shares of ICG, Inc. common stock were not
reported prior to November 15, 2004. |
36
Use of proceeds
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering will be approximately
$ million,
or
$ million
if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full, based on the public offering price of
$ and
after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and the estimated offering expenses, which are payable by us.
Under the terms of our credit facilities, we are required to use
50% of our net proceeds from this offering to repay amounts
outstanding under our term loan facility, which otherwise
matures on October 1, 2010. As of March 31, 2005 (pro
forma for the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions), our total debt
was $216.7 million. As of March 31, 2005, amounts
outstanding under our term loan facility bore interest at a
weighted average rate of approximately 5.36% and the Anker debt
bore interest at an average rate ranging from 8% to 10%. For
additional information, see Description of
indebtedness.
We expect to retire all of our debt, excluding $7.1 million
of capitalized leases and other debt obligations, with the net
proceeds of this offering and use our remaining net proceeds for
general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the
remaining proceeds to pursue possible acquisitions of
businesses, technologies, products or assets complementary to
our business. Although we currently have no commitments or
agreements to make any additional material acquisitions for
cash, we may make acquisitions in the future. Pending our use of
any excess net proceeds, we intend to invest the excess net
proceeds of this offering in short-term, interest-bearing
investment-grade or government securities.
Dividend policy
We have never declared or paid a dividend on our common stock.
We may retain any future earnings to support the development and
expansion of our business or make additional payments under our
credit facilities and, as a result, we may not pay cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. Our payment of any future
dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors
after taking into account various factors, including our
financial condition, operating results, cash needs, growth plans
and the terms of any credit agreements that we may be a party to
at the time. Our credit facilities limit us from paying cash
dividends or other payments or distributions with respect to our
capital stock in excess of certain limitations. In addition, the
terms of any future credit agreement may contain similar
restrictions on our ability to pay dividends or make payments or
distributions with respect to our capital stock.
37
Capitalization
The following unaudited table sets forth cash and cash
equivalents and capitalization as of March 31, 2005:
|
|
4 |
for ICG, Inc. on an actual basis; |
|
4 |
for ICG on a pro forma basis to give effect to the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions; and |
|
4 |
for ICG on a pro forma, as adjusted basis, to give effect to the
Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions and the sale by us of
approximately shares
of our common stock in this offering at an assumed public
offering price of
$ ,
the last sale price of our common stock
on ,
2005, as quoted on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service,
after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering
expenses and the application of the estimated net proceeds as
described under Use of proceeds. |
The following unaudited table assumes no exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option in connection with this
offering. You should read the information in this table in
conjunction with Unaudited consolidated pro forma
financial information, Managements discussion
and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations, Description of indebtedness and
the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2005 (unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma, as | |
|
|
|
|
adjusted for | |
|
|
Actual | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
the offering | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
24,974 |
|
|
$ |
35,032 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan
facility(1)
|
|
|
174,563 |
|
|
|
209,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term debt, including capital leases
|
|
|
2,593 |
|
|
|
7,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$ |
177,156 |
|
|
$ |
216,653 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share,
1,800,000,000 shares authorized, 106,605,999 shares
issued and outstanding, actual
and shares
issued and outstanding, as adjusted for the offering and the
Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions(2)
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share,
200,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and
outstanding(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in-capital
|
|
|
150,140 |
|
|
|
440,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
165,257 |
|
|
|
456,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
342,413 |
|
|
$ |
673,160 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Our current credit facility provides for a
$110.0 million revolving credit facility, of which up to
$60.0 million may be used for letters of credit. As of
March 31, 2005, $49.9 million of letters of credit
were outstanding. |
|
(2) |
Represents stock of our predecessor, ICG, Inc. The par value
of our common stock is $0.01 per share and the par value of
our preferred stock is $0.01 per share. |
38
Dilution
If you invest in our common stock, you will experience dilution
to the extent of the difference between the public offering
price per share you pay in this offering and the pro forma net
tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately
after this offering.
Our pro forma net tangible book value as of March 31, 2005,
pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions, equaled
approximately
$ million,
or
$ per
share of common stock. Pro forma net tangible book value per
share of common stock is equal to the amount of our total
tangible assets (total assets less intangible assets) less total
liabilities, divided by the total number of shares of common
stock outstanding.
On a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the sale
of shares
of common stock offered by us in this offering at an assumed
public offering price of
$ per
share (the last sale price of our common stock
on ,
2005, as quoted on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service)
and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and offering expenses payable by us and the
application of the estimated net proceeds of this offering as
described under Use of proceeds, and after giving
effect to the issuance
of shares
of common stock upon completion of the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions at an implied value of
$ per
share, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value, as of
March 31, 2005 would have equaled approximately
$ ,
or
$ per
share of common stock. This represents an immediate increase in
net tangible book value of
$ per
share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in
net tangible book value of
$ per
share to new investors of common stock in this offering. If the
public offering price in this offering is higher or lower, the
dilution to new investors will be greater or less, respectively.
The following table illustrates this per share dilution to new
investors purchasing our common stock in this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed public offering price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of March 31,
2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share
attributable to this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table as of March 31, 2005 summarizes, on a
pro forma basis, to give effect to the shares issued in
connection with the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions and the
corporate reorganization, the number of shares of common stock
purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us and the
average price per share paid by the existing stockholders and by
new investors. The calculations with respect to existing
stockholders include shares that would be issued by us on the
exercise of currently outstanding options or other rights to
acquire shares of our common stock by directors, officers and
affiliated parties, and the proceeds that would be received by
us in connection with this exercise. The calculations with
respect to shares purchased by new investors in this offering
reflect an assumed public offering price of
$ per
share (the last sale price of our common stock
on ,
2005, as quoted on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service).
39
Dilution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares purchased or | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuable upon the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise of currently | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding options | |
|
Total consideration | |
|
Average | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
price per | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
share | |
| |
Existing stockholders, directors, officers and affiliated parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former Anker stockholders and CoalQuest members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table and calculations above assume no exercise of
outstanding options. As
of , 2005,
shares of common stock were subject to outstanding options at a
weighted average exercise price of
$ per
share. To the extent outstanding options are exercised, there
will be further dilution to new investors.
40
Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data
The following unaudited pro forma financial data is based on the
information derived from the consolidated financial statements
of ICG, Inc. and its subsidiaries (and its predecessors), Anker
and CoalQuest, each appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma balance sheet as of March 31, 2005
gives effect to the following transactions as if they had
occurred on March 31, 2005, and the unaudited pro forma
statements of operations for the year ended December 31,
2004 and the three months ended March 31, 2005 also give
effect to the following transactions as if they had occurred on
January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2005, respectively:
|
|
4 |
our corporate reorganization, involving the exchange of ICG
common stock for existing shares of ICG, Inc. common stock at a
1-for-1 exchange ratio; |
|
4 |
our acquisition of the Horizon assets (including the preliminary
application of purchase accounting) (for purposes of the
December 31, 2004 unaudited pro forma statement of
operations data only); |
|
4 |
borrowings under our credit facilities, in part, to finance the
Horizon asset acquisition and the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions; |
|
4 |
the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions; and |
|
4 |
this offering. |
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations
and unaudited pro forma balance sheet do not include any
adjustments for future cost savings or operating improvements as
a result of the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions or for any
other reason. See Risk factors, Special note
regarding forward-looking statements, and
Business for a discussion of factors that may impact
consolidated future operating results.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
of ICG, Inc. (and its predecessors), Anker and CoalQuest, and
the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus, including Managements discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of operations.
The pro forma adjustments reflect our preliminary estimates of
the purchase price allocation of certain assets and liabilities
in the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions. An allocation to
inventory would impact cost of coal sales subsequent to the
acquisition date. An allocation to coal reserves, property,
plant and equipment, coal supply agreements or other intangible
assets would result in additional depreciation, depletion and
amortization expense which may be significant. Our preliminary
estimates of the allocations may change upon finalization of
appraisals and other valuation studies that we have arranged to
be obtained by October 2005. Although we do not expect any
adjustments to be material, we cannot assure you that the final
allocations will not differ significantly from those shown.
The unaudited pro forma financial data is for informational
purposes only and is not intended to represent or be indicative
of the consolidated results of operations or financial position
that would have been reported had the transactions been
completed as of the dates presented, and should not be taken as
representative of future consolidated results of operations or
financial position.
41
Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data
Unaudited pro forma balance sheet data
as of March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
Anker | |
|
CoalQuest | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
Anker | |
|
CoalQuest | |
|
reorganization | |
|
acquisition | |
|
acquisition | |
|
Offering | |
|
|
|
|
historical | |
|
historical | |
|
historical | |
|
adjustments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
24,974 |
|
|
$ |
2,342 |
|
|
$ |
1,862 |
|
|
$ |
5,854 |
(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,032 |
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
50,560 |
|
|
|
11,686 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,639 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
16,816 |
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,751 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,860 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
5,588 |
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
104,937 |
|
|
|
19,569 |
|
|
|
3,289 |
|
|
|
5,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost including coal reserves,
mine development and contract costs
|
|
|
183,838 |
|
|
|
143,855 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,183 |
(2) |
|
|
55,091 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,967 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(16,705 |
) |
|
|
(82,601 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
167,133 |
|
|
|
61,254 |
|
|
|
18,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,183 |
|
|
|
55,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs, net
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
Advance royalties
|
|
|
4,986 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,218 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
183,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
(1) |
|
|
148,317 |
(2) |
|
|
42,952 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,215 |
|
Deferred tax asset non-current
|
|
|
5,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,997 |
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
5,756 |
|
|
|
8,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
480,349 |
|
|
$ |
92,121 |
|
|
$ |
22,192 |
|
|
$ |
10,854 |
|
|
$ |
171,500 |
|
|
$ |
98,043 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
875,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY/(DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$ |
27,766 |
|
|
$ |
14,603 |
|
|
$ |
516 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42,885 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
|
18,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,532 |
)(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,281 |
|
|
Current portion of reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,731 |
|
|
Accrued income tax
|
|
|
5,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,166 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
35,658 |
|
|
|
7,982 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
75,513 |
|
|
|
43,206 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
(15,532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities, less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
172,915 |
|
|
|
10,071 |
|
|
|
16,250 |
|
|
|
26,386(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,250 |
) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,372 |
|
|
Reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
40,480 |
|
|
|
23,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,149 |
|
|
Long-term employee benefits
|
|
|
18,924 |
|
|
|
4,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,582 |
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
8,767 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
239,579 |
|
|
|
47,165 |
|
|
|
17,289 |
|
|
|
26,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
314,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$ |
315,092 |
|
|
$ |
90,371 |
|
|
$ |
18,485 |
|
|
$ |
10,854 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(16,250 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
418,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock-par value $0.0001, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock-par value $0.0001, 1,800,000,000 shares
authorized, 106,605,999 issued and outstanding (137,556,128
issued and outstanding at a par value of $0.01 on a pro forma
basis)
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,055 |
(4) |
|
|
195 |
(4) |
|
|
115 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
Paid-in Capital
|
|
|
150,140 |
|
|
|
145,588 |
|
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
|
(1,055 |
)(4) |
|
|
27,467 |
(2,4) |
|
|
114,635 |
(2,3,4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,025 |
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
|
(143,838 |
) |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,838 |
(2) |
|
|
(457 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (members deficit)
|
|
|
165,257 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
3,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,500 |
|
|
|
114,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
456,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (members
deficit)
|
|
$ |
480,349 |
|
|
$ |
92,121 |
|
|
$ |
22,192 |
|
|
$ |
10,854 |
|
|
$ |
171,500 |
|
|
$ |
98,043 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
875,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reflects an increase of $35.0 million to ICGs term
loan to pay off Ankers existing debt of $24.1 million
(not including equipment leases of $4.5 million) and to
record the related acquisition costs of $5.0 million. |
|
(2) |
Reflects the issuance of 30,950,129 additional common shares,
the maximum number of shares issuable, for the acquisitions of
Anker ($173.25 million) and CoalQuest
($101.75 million) for a total of $275.0 million. |
|
(3) |
Reflects the conversion of CoalQuests notes payable
($16.3 million) to equity upon consummation of the Anker
and CoalQuest acquisitions. |
|
(4) |
Reflects the change in par value from $0.0001 per share to
$0.01 per share upon the effective date of this offering. |
42
Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data
Unaudited pro forma statement of operations data
for the three months ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
Anker | |
|
CoalQuest | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
Anker | |
|
CoalQuest | |
|
reorganization | |
|
acquisition | |
|
acquisition | |
|
Offering | |
|
|
|
|
historical | |
|
historical | |
|
historical | |
|
adjustments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
Pro forma | |
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales revenues
|
|
$ |
144,197 |
|
|
$ |
42,142 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
186,339 |
|
|
Freight and handling revenues
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
3,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
6,536 |
|
|
|
2,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
153,232 |
|
|
|
47,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
3,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues (exclusive of
depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)
|
|
|
117,184 |
|
|
|
40,818 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(431 |
)(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,690 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
8,522 |
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
(2) |
|
|
77 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,656 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative (exclusive of depreciation,
depletion and amortization shown separately above)
|
|
|
4,935 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,045 |
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
133,140 |
|
|
|
47,966 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
20,092 |
|
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,690 |
|
|
Interest and other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,145 |
) |
|
|
(615 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,946 |
) |
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(431 |
)(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other income (expense)
|
|
|
(2,509 |
) |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
17,583 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,878 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(6,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
(4) |
|
|
(263 |
)(4) |
|
|
134 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
10,857 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
(374 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
10,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,039 |
|
|
Average shares of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,556,128 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
10,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,039 |
|
|
Average shares of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,556,128 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(footnotes on next page)
43
Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data
(1) To eliminate intercompany royalty
revenue and expense ($0.431 million) between CoalQuest and
Anker.
(2) To record depletion expense on the
purchase price allocation to coal reserves of $23.2 million
to Anker and $55.0 million to CoalQuest.
(3) Represents the decrease in
interest expense as a result of the repayment of the term loan
with a portion of the proceeds of this offering as shown in the
tables below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical interest expense | |
Description |
|
| |
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
Anker | |
|
CoalQuest | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Revolver letter of credit fees
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
Revolver unutilized portion
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
Term note
|
|
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,324 |
|
Amortization of finance costs
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271 |
|
Annual administration fee
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Interest rate cap
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
Revolver base rate interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anker related party term loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
Anker related party revolving line of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
Anker senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
Miscellaneous other (capital lease, black lung, etc.)
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total historical interest expense
|
|
$ |
3,145 |
|
|
$ |
615 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
3,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma interest expense | |
|
|
| |
Description |
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
Anker | |
|
CoalQuest | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Revolver letter of credit fees(a)
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
Revolver unutilized portion(b)
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294 |
|
Term note(c)
|
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,814 |
|
Amortization of finance costs(d)
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271 |
|
Annual administration fee(e)
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Interest rate cap(f)
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
Miscellaneous other (capital lease, black lung, etc.)
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pro forma interest expense
|
|
$ |
3,855 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,946 |
|
Less: historical interest expense
|
|
$ |
3,145 |
|
|
$ |
615 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
3,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma interest expense adjustment
|
|
$ |
(710 |
) |
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects pro forma interest expense at the fixed rate of 2.7%
on $49.9 million estimated letters of credit outstanding
under the revolving letter of credit facility. |
|
(b) |
|
Reflects pro forma interest expense at the fixed rate of 0.5%
on an estimated unutilized balance of $235.1 million on the
revolving facility. |
|
(c) |
|
Reflects pro forma interest expense at the actual
March 31, 2005 rate of 5.36% on the $210 million term
note. The term note utilizes LIBOR rate and is adjusted
quarterly. |
|
(d) |
|
Reflects amortization of finance costs of $8.1 million
at a nominal rate of 8.118% for 72 months. |
|
(e) |
|
Reflects the quarterly administration fee of $25 thousand per
quarter to the administration agent. |
|
(f) |
|
Reflects the estimated reduction in interest expense as a
result of our two year Interest Rate Cap agreement of
$88 million at a maximum rate of 4.5% per year. |
44
Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data
A 0.125% change in interest rates on our variable rate debt
would cause pro forma interest expense to increase $65,625 for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
(4) To reflect the federal and state tax effects on the
combined historical net income and pro forma adjustments
assuming an estimated average tax rate at March 31, 2005 of
38.255%.
(5) Represents pro forma earnings per share information
based on 137,556,128 outstanding shares of ICG common stock
consisting of 106,605,999 shares of ICG common stock
outstanding as of March 31, 2005 and 30,950,129 shares
of ICG common stock issuable in the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions, the maximum number of shares that will be issued.
The number of shares of ICG common stock to be issued to former
stockholders of Anker in connection with the merger is subject
to possible adjustments. As the following chart illustrates, the
higher the offering price per share of ICG common stock in this
offering, the fewer shares of ICG common stock will be issued in
connection with the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions. See
Business Our history The Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions for more information on acquisition
adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share offering price of ICG common stock
|
|
|
$8.885 |
|
|
|
$10.00 |
|
|
|
$11.00 |
|
|
|
$12.00 |
|
|
|
$13.00 |
|
|
|
$14.00 |
|
|
|
$15.00 |
|
|
Aggregate shares of ICG common stock to be issued to holders of
Anker and CoalQuest: Without adjustments
|
|
|
30,950,129 |
|
|
|
27,500,000 |
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
22,916,667 |
|
|
|
21,153,846 |
|
|
|
19,642,857 |
|
|
|
18,333,333 |
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
$0.080 |
|
|
|
$0.082 |
|
|
|
$0.084 |
|
|
|
$0.085 |
|
|
|
$0.086 |
|
|
|
$0.087 |
|
|
|
$0.088 |
|
|
|
With adjustments
|
|
|
29,824,670 |
|
|
|
26,500,000 |
|
|
|
24,090,909 |
|
|
|
22,083,333 |
|
|
|
20,384,615 |
|
|
|
18,928,571 |
|
|
|
17,666,667 |
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
$0.081 |
|
|
|
$0.083 |
|
|
|
$0.084 |
|
|
|
$0.086 |
|
|
|
$0.087 |
|
|
|
$0.088 |
|
|
|
$0.089 |
|
|
45
Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data
Unaudited pro forma statement of operations data
for the year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon | |
|
Anker | |
|
CoalQuest | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
Horizon | |
|
Anker | |
|
CoalQuest | |
|
acquisition | |
|
acquisition | |
|
acquisition | |
|
Offering | |
|
|
|
|
historical | |
|
historical | |
|
historical | |
|
historical | |
|
adjustments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
Pro forma(1) | |
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales revenues
|
|
$ |
130,463 |
|
|
$ |
346,981 |
|
|
$ |
146,676 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
624,120 |
|
|
Freight and handling revenues
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
11,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,996 |
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
4,766 |
|
|
|
22,702 |
|
|
|
6,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
136,109 |
|
|
|
373,383 |
|
|
|
164,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
11,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,996 |
|
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues
|
|
|
113,707 |
|
|
|
306,429 |
|
|
|
145,985 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,769 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,723 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
7,943 |
|
|
|
27,547 |
|
|
|
9,754 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400(3 |
) |
|
|
331(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,054 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
4,194 |
|
|
|
8,477 |
|
|
|
4,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,257 |
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
Writedowns and other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
126,714 |
|
|
|
355,945 |
|
|
|
171,741 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,369 |
) |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
653,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
9,395 |
|
|
|
17,438 |
|
|
|
(7,421 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Interest and other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,453 |
) |
|
|
(114,211 |
) |
|
|
(1,485 |
) |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
103,391(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,293 |
) |
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
5,709 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,769 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other income (expense)
|
|
|
(2,555 |
) |
|
|
(111,903 |
) |
|
|
4,224 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
103,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
6,840 |
|
|
|
(94,465 |
) |
|
|
(3,197 |
) |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
103,391 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(2,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,381 |
)(5) |
|
|
692(5 |
) |
|
|
445(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,835 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
$ |
(94,465 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,197 |
) |
|
$ |
925 |
|
|
$ |
100,010 |
|
|
$ |
2,061 |
|
|
$ |
(1,655 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,928 |
|
|
Average shares of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,556,128(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earning per share
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.06(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,928 |
|
|
Average shares of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,556,128(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.06(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The above pro forma income statement does not
reflect the removal of non-recurring charges for writedowns and
other items of $10.0 million and reorganization items of
$0.7 million incurred in connection with Horizons
Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.
(2) To eliminate intercompany royalty
revenue and expense ($1.8 million) between CoalQuest and
Anker.
(3) To record depletion expense on the
purchase price allocation to coal reserves of $23.2 million
to Anker and $55.0 million to CoalQuest.
46
Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data
(4) The tables below represents the net adjustments to
interest expense as a result of the payoff of the term loan with
a portion of the proceeds of this offering and the elimination
of interest expense incurred in connection with Horizons
Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical interest expense | |
|
|
| |
Description |
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
Horizon | |
|
Anker | |
|
CoalQuest | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Amortization of financing fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
DIP facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,115 |
|
Term loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,757 |
|
Wells Fargo loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,200 |
|
Funded letter of credit fees
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
Revolver letter of credit fees
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
Revolver unutilized portion
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
Term note
|
|
|
2,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,463 |
|
Amortization of finance costs
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266 |
|
Annual administration fee
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Interest rate cap
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Revolver base rate interest
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Anker related party term loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293 |
|
Anker related party revolving line of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
Anker senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752 |
|
Miscellaneous other (capital lease, black lung, etc.)
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
1,702 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
$ |
535 |
|
|
|
2,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total historical interest expense
|
|
$ |
3,453 |
|
|
$ |
114,211 |
|
|
$ |
1,485 |
|
|
$ |
535 |
|
|
$ |
119,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma interest expense | |
|
|
| |
Description |
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
Horizon | |
|
Anker | |
|
CoalQuest | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Revolver letter of credit fees(a)
|
|
$ |
1,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,469 |
|
Revolver unutilized portion(b)
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
Term note(c)
|
|
|
10,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,479 |
|
Amortization of finance costs(d)
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
Annual administration fee(e)
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
Interest rate cap(f)
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
Miscellaneous other (capital lease, black lung, etc.)
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
1,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pro forma interest expense
|
|
$ |
14,591 |
|
|
$ |
1,702 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,293 |
|
Less: historical interest expense
|
|
$ |
3,453 |
|
|
$ |
114,211 |
|
|
$ |
1,485 |
|
|
$ |
535 |
|
|
$ |
119,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma interest expense adjustment
|
|
$ |
(11,138 |
) |
|
$ |
112,509 |
|
|
$ |
1,485 |
|
|
$ |
535 |
|
|
|
103,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects pro forma interest expense at the fixed rate of 2.7%
on $54.4 million estimated letters of credit outstanding
under the revolving letter of credit facility. |
|
(b) |
|
Reflects pro forma interest expense at the fixed rate of 0.5%
on an estimated unutilized balance of $230.6 million on the
revolving facility. |
|
(c) |
|
Reflects pro forma interest expense at the actual
December 31, 2004 rate of 4.99% on the $210 million
term note. The term utilizes LIBOR rate and is adjusted
quarterly. |
|
(d) |
|
Reflects amortization of finance costs of $8.1 million
at a nominal rate of 8.118% for 72 months. |
|
(e) |
|
Reflects the quarterly administration fee of $25 thousand per
quarter to the administrative agent. |
|
(f) |
|
Reflects the estimated expense incurred as a result of our
two year Interest Rate Cap agreement of $88 million at a
maximum rate of 4.5% per year. |
47
Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data
A 0.125% change in interest rates on our variable rate debt
would cause pro forma interest expense to increase $262,500 for
the year ended December 31, 2004.
(5) To reflect the federal and state tax effects on the
combined historical net income and pro forma adjustments
assuming an estimated average tax rate at December 31, 2004
of 37.88%.
(6) Represents pro forma earnings per share information
based on 137,556,128 outstanding shares of ICG common stock
consisting of 106,605,999 shares of ICG common stock
outstanding as of December 31, 2004 and
30,950,129 shares of ICG common stock issuable in the Anker
and CoalQuest acquisitions, the maximum number of shares that
will be issued. The number of shares of ICG common stock to be
issued to former stockholders of Anker in connection with the
merger is subject to possible adjustments. As the following
chart illustrates, the higher the offering price per share of
ICG common stock in this offering, the fewer shares of ICG
common stock will be issued in connection with the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions. See Business Our
history The Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions for
more information on acquisition adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share offering price of ICG common stock
|
|
|
$8.885 |
|
|
|
$10.00 |
|
|
|
$11.00 |
|
|
|
$12.00 |
|
|
|
$13.00 |
|
|
|
$14.00 |
|
|
|
$15.00 |
|
|
Aggregate shares of ICG common stock to be issued to holders of
Anker and CoalQuest: Without adjustments
|
|
|
30,950,129 |
|
|
|
27,500,000 |
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
22,916,667 |
|
|
|
21,153,846 |
|
|
|
19,642,857 |
|
|
|
18,333,333 |
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
$0.058 |
|
|
|
$0.059 |
|
|
|
$0.060 |
|
|
|
$0.061 |
|
|
|
$0.062 |
|
|
|
$0.063 |
|
|
|
$0.063 |
|
|
|
With adjustments
|
|
|
29,824,670 |
|
|
|
26,500,000 |
|
|
|
24,090,909 |
|
|
|
22,083,333 |
|
|
|
20,384,615 |
|
|
|
18,928,571 |
|
|
|
17,666,667 |
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
$0.058 |
|
|
|
$0.060 |
|
|
|
$0.061 |
|
|
|
$0.062 |
|
|
|
$0.062 |
|
|
|
$0.063 |
|
|
|
$0.064 |
|
|
48
Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data
Selected historical consolidated financial data of ICG
ICG is a recently formed holding company which does not have any
independent external operations, assets or liabilities, other
than through its operating subsidiaries. Prior to the
acquisition of certain assets of Horizon as of
September 30, 2004, ICG, Inc. did not have any material
assets, liabilities or results of operations. The selected
historical consolidated financial data is derived from ICG,
Inc.s audited consolidated statement of operations for the
period May 13, 2004 to December 31, 2004 and the
predecessor audited consolidated financial data as of and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2004, which have been
audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm and are included elsewhere in
the prospectus and the selected historical consolidated
financial data as of and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 have been derived from ICG, Inc.s
unaudited consolidated financial statements and are included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected historical
consolidated financial data as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2003 and the period from May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002 have been derived from the audited
consolidated statement of operations of Horizon, the predecessor
to ICG, which have been audited by Deloitte & Touche
LLP and which are included elsewhere in the prospectus and from
the audited consolidated balance sheet of Horizon as of
December 31, 2002, which has been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP and which is not included in this
prospectus and the selected historical consolidated financial
data as of and for the three month period ended March 31,
2004 have been derived from Horizons unaudited financial
statements and are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
selected historical consolidated data for the period as of and
for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 were derived
from the audited consolidated financial statements of AEI
Resources, the predecessor to Horizon, which were audited by
Arthur Andersen LLP, in the case of the financial data for the
years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 and which are not
included in this prospectus. The selected historical
consolidated financial data is derived from the statement of
operations of AEI Resources, the predecessor of Horizon, for the
period January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002, included
elsewhere in this prospectus, and has been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP. In the opinion of
management, the financial data reflect all adjustments,
consisting of all normal and recurring adjustments, necessary
for a fair presentation of the results for those periods. The
results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or
for any future period. The financial statements for the
predecessor periods have been prepared on a
carve-out basis to include the assets, liabilities
and results of operations of ICG, Inc. that were previously
included on the consolidated financial statements of Horizon.
The financial statements for the predecessor periods include
allocations of certain expenses, taxation charges, interest and
cash balances relating to the predecessor based on
managements estimates. The predecessor financial
information is not necessarily indicative of the consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows of ICG
if it had operated during the predecessor periods presented.
You should read the following data in conjunction with
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations and with the financial
information included elsewhere in this prospectus, including the
consolidated financial statements of ICG and Horizon (and its
predecessor) and the related notes thereto.
49
Selected historical consolidated financial data of ICG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HORIZON |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
|
|
AEI RESOURCES |
|
|
HORIZON |
|
|
|
|
|
to ICG, |
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor to Horizon |
|
|
Predecessor to ICG, Inc. |
|
|
ICG, Inc. |
|
|
Inc. |
|
|
ICG, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
Period | |
|
|
Period | |
|
|
Three | |
|
|
Three | |
|
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
May 10, | |
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
May 13, | |
|
|
months |
|
|
|
months |
|
|
Year ended | |
|
Year ended | |
|
2002 to | |
|
|
2002 to | |
|
Year ended | |
|
2004 to | |
|
|
2004 to | |
|
|
ended | |
|
|
ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
May 9, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2000* | |
|
2001* | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data) |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales revenues
|
|
$ |
486,848 |
|
|
$ |
500,829 |
|
|
$ |
136,040 |
|
|
|
$ |
264,235 |
|
|
$ |
441,291 |
|
|
$ |
346,981 |
|
|
|
$ |
130,463 |
|
|
|
$ |
110,013 |
|
|
|
$ |
144,197 |
|
|
Freight and handling revenues
|
|
|
11,050 |
|
|
|
14,728 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
|
6,032 |
|
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
23,491 |
|
|
|
34,835 |
|
|
|
21,183 |
|
|
|
|
27,397 |
|
|
|
31,771 |
|
|
|
22,702 |
|
|
|
|
4,766 |
|
|
|
|
6,452 |
|
|
|
|
6,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
521,389 |
|
|
|
550,392 |
|
|
|
160,170 |
|
|
|
|
297,664 |
|
|
|
481,070 |
|
|
|
373,383 |
|
|
|
|
136,109 |
|
|
|
|
118,276 |
|
|
|
|
153,232 |
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
|
11,050 |
|
|
|
14,728 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
|
6,032 |
|
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues (exclusive of
depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)
|
|
|
409,536 |
|
|
|
379,333 |
|
|
|
114,767 |
|
|
|
|
251,361 |
|
|
|
400,652 |
|
|
|
306,429 |
|
|
|
|
113,707 |
|
|
|
|
98,002 |
|
|
|
|
117,184 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
94,183 |
|
|
|
92,602 |
|
|
|
32,316 |
|
|
|
|
40,033 |
|
|
|
52,254 |
|
|
|
27,547 |
|
|
|
|
7,943 |
|
|
|
|
9,502 |
|
|
|
|
8,522 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative (exclusive of depreciation,
depletion and amortization shown separately above)
|
|
|
20,364 |
|
|
|
19,324 |
|
|
|
9,677 |
|
|
|
|
16,695 |
|
|
|
23,350 |
|
|
|
8,477 |
|
|
|
|
4,194 |
|
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
|
4,935 |
|
|
(Gain)/loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(594 |
) |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(4,320 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Writedowns and special items
|
|
|
12,306 |
|
|
|
20,218 |
|
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
|
729,953 |
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
546,845 |
|
|
|
526,394 |
|
|
|
167,937 |
|
|
|
|
1,044,035 |
|
|
|
489,044 |
|
|
|
355,945 |
|
|
|
|
126,714 |
|
|
|
|
111,584 |
|
|
|
|
133,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(25,456 |
) |
|
|
23,998 |
|
|
|
(7,767 |
) |
|
|
|
(746,371 |
) |
|
|
(7,974 |
) |
|
|
17,438 |
|
|
|
|
9,395 |
|
|
|
|
6,692 |
|
|
|
|
20,092 |
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(116,319 |
) |
|
|
(138,655 |
) |
|
|
(36,666 |
) |
|
|
|
(80,405 |
) |
|
|
(145,892 |
) |
|
|
(114,211 |
) |
|
|
|
(3,453 |
) |
|
|
|
(37,217 |
) |
|
|
|
(3,145 |
) |
Reorganization items
|
|
|
(429,751 |
) |
|
|
(22,839 |
) |
|
|
1,567,689 |
|
|
|
|
(143,663 |
) |
|
|
(52,784 |
) |
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1,523 |
) |
|
|
(2,941 |
) |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other income (expense)
|
|
|
(547,593 |
) |
|
|
(164,435 |
) |
|
|
1,531,522 |
|
|
|
|
(222,812 |
) |
|
|
(198,489 |
) |
|
|
(111,903 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,555 |
) |
|
|
|
(15,838 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,509 |
) |
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(573,049 |
) |
|
|
(140,437 |
) |
|
|
1,523,755 |
|
|
|
|
(969,183 |
) |
|
|
(206,463 |
) |
|
|
(94,465 |
) |
|
|
|
6,840 |
|
|
|
|
(9,146 |
) |
|
|
|
17,583 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
48,290 |
|
|
|
(4,155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(524,759 |
) |
|
$ |
(144,592 |
) |
|
$ |
1,523,755 |
|
|
|
$ |
(969,183 |
) |
|
$ |
(206,463 |
) |
|
$ |
(94,465 |
) |
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,146 |
) |
|
|
$ |
10,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per
share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
Average common shares
outstanding(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
Balance sheet data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
55,513 |
|
|
$ |
64,592 |
|
|
$ |
87,278 |
|
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,967 |
|
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
|
$ |
24,974 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
881,847 |
|
|
|
859,084 |
|
|
|
1,521,318 |
|
|
|
|
484,212 |
|
|
|
407,064 |
|
|
|
370,298 |
|
|
|
|
459,975 |
|
|
|
|
414,373 |
|
|
|
|
480,349 |
|
Long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
933,106 |
|
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
173,446 |
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
172,915 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,451,796 |
|
|
|
1,581,346 |
|
|
|
1,286,318 |
|
|
|
|
1,222,218 |
|
|
|
1,351,393 |
|
|
|
1,409,092 |
|
|
|
|
305,575 |
|
|
|
|
1,367,847 |
|
|
|
|
315,092 |
|
Total stockholders equity (members deficit)
|
|
$ |
(569,949 |
) |
|
$ |
(722,262 |
) |
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
(738,006 |
) |
|
$ |
(944,329 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,038,794 |
) |
|
|
$ |
154,400 |
|
|
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
165,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (members deficit)
|
|
$ |
881,847 |
|
|
$ |
859,084 |
|
|
$ |
1,521,318 |
|
|
|
$ |
484,212 |
|
|
$ |
407,064 |
|
|
$ |
370,298 |
|
|
|
$ |
459,975 |
|
|
|
$ |
414,373 |
|
|
|
$ |
480,349 |
|
Statement of cash flows data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
106,060 |
|
|
$ |
(298,196 |
) |
|
|
$ |
76,372 |
|
|
$ |
17,753 |
|
|
$ |
34,057 |
|
|
|
$ |
30,209 |
|
|
|
$ |
17,025 |
|
|
|
$ |
21,837 |
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(88,434 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,841 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(12,799 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,549 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,535 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(329,166 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(1,720 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(18,519 |
) |
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,547 |
) |
|
$ |
259,011 |
|
|
|
$ |
(78,025 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,459 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,381 |
) |
|
|
$ |
322,924 |
|
|
|
$ |
(15,597 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(2,311 |
) |
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
24,143 |
|
|
$ |
34,254 |
|
|
$ |
10,963 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,435 |
|
|
$ |
16,937 |
|
|
$ |
6,624 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,583 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,890 |
|
|
|
$ |
18,519 |
|
|
|
* |
The selected historical financial data of AEI Resources for
the year ended December 31, 2000 and the year ended
December 31, 2001 is not derived from audited financial
statements. |
|
|
(1) |
Earnings per share data and average shares outstanding are
not presented for the period from January 1, 2002 to
May 9, 2002, the period from May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002, the year ended December 31, 2003
and the period from January 1, 2004 to September 30,
2004 because they were prepared on a carve-out basis. The
financial statements prepared for predecessor periods are
carve-out financial statements reflecting the operations and
financial condition of the Horizon assets acquired by ICG as of
September 30, 2004 (collectively, the combined
companies). The predecessor financial statements were
prepared from the separate accounts and records maintained by
the combined companies. In addition, certain assets and expense
items represent allocations from Horizon. The accounts allocated
include vendor advances, reclamation deposits and selling,
general and administrative expenses. |
50
Selected historical consolidated financial data of Anker and
CoalQuest
The following table presents the selected historical
consolidated financial data for Anker and CoalQuest. The
selected historical consolidated financial data for the year
ended December 31, 2004 have been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements of Anker and CoalQuest,
respectively, each of which have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm and are included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The selected historical consolidated financial data as of and
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 have been derived
from Ankers and CoalQuests unaudited consolidated
financial statements and are included elsewhere in this
prospectus. In the opinion of management, the financial data
reflect all adjustments, consisting of all normal and recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results
for those periods. The results of operations for interim periods
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for
the full year or for any future period.
You should read the following data in conjunction with
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations and with the financial
information included elsewhere in this prospectus, including the
audited consolidated financial statements of Anker and CoalQuest
and related notes thereto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anker | |
|
CoalQuest | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Year ended | |
|
|
Three months | |
|
Year ended | |
|
|
Three months | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
ended | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
ended | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
| |
Statement of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(3,196,973 |
) |
|
|
$ |
353,169 |
|
|
$ |
925,553 |
|
|
|
$ |
158,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,165,559 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,342,409 |
|
|
$ |
1,818,833 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,862,469 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
83,370,701 |
|
|
|
|
92,122,446 |
|
|
|
21,993,658 |
|
|
|
|
22,192,429 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
81,973,367 |
|
|
|
|
90,371,943 |
|
|
|
18,370,242 |
|
|
|
|
18,485,884 |
|
Total stockholders equity (members deficit)
|
|
$ |
1,397,334 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,750,503 |
|
|
$ |
3,623,416 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,706,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity/members
deficit
|
|
$ |
83,370,701 |
|
|
|
$ |
92,122,446 |
|
|
$ |
21,993,658 |
|
|
|
$ |
22,192,429 |
|
Statement of cash flows data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
10,149,401 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,626,316 |
|
|
$ |
1,318,103 |
|
|
|
$ |
118,591 |
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
$ |
(26,298,582 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(9,544,590 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
$ |
14,137,990 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,095,124 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(75,005 |
) |
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
27,238,311 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,052,090 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
51
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements
that include numerous risks and uncertainties. Actual results
could differ materially from those discussed in the
forward-looking statements as a result of these risks and
uncertainties, including those set forth in this prospectus
under Special note regarding forward-looking
statements and under Risk factors. You should
read the following discussion in conjunction with Selected
historical consolidated financial data of ICG and audited
consolidated financial statements and notes of ICG, Inc. and the
audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements and
notes of Horizon and its predecessors, each appearing elsewhere
in this prospectus.
OVERVIEW
The company was formed by WLR and other investors in May 2004 to
acquire and operate competitive coal mining facilities. Through
the acquisition of key assets from the Horizon bankruptcy
estate, the WLR investor group was able to target properties
strategically located in Appalachia and the Illinois Basin with
high quality reserves that are union free, have limited
reclamation liabilities and are substantially free of legacy
liabilities. Due to our initial capitalization, we were able to
complete the acquisition without significantly increasing our
level of indebtedness. Following this offering, we expect to
retire substantially all of our debt and, thus, will be
strategically well-positioned. Consistent with the WLR investor
groups strategy to acquire profitable coal assets, the
Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions further diversifies our
reserves.
We produce, process and sell steam coal from five regional
business units, which, as of December 31, 2004 were
supported by five active underground mines, seven active surface
mines and three preparation plants located throughout West
Virginia, Kentucky and Illinois. We also broker coal produced by
others; the majority of which is shipped directly from the third
party producer to the ultimate customer. Our sales of steam coal
were made to large utilities and industrial customers in the
Eastern region of the United States. In addition, we generate
other revenues from the manufacture and operation of highwall
mining systems, parts sales and shop services relating to those
systems and coal handling and processing fees.
Coal revenues result from sales contracts (long-term coal
agreements or purchase orders) with electric utilities,
industrial companies or other coal-related organizations,
primarily in the eastern United States. Revenue is recognized
and recorded at the time of shipment or delivery to the
customer, at fixed or determinable prices, and the title has
passed in accordance with the terms of the sales agreement.
Under the typical terms of these agreements, risk of loss
transfers to the customers at the mine or port, where coal is
loaded to the rail, barge, truck or other transportation sources
that deliver coal to its destination.
Freight and handling costs paid to third-party carriers and
invoiced to coal customers are recorded as freight and handling
costs and freight and handling revenues, respectively.
Other revenues consist of equipment and parts sales, equipment
rebuild and maintenance services, coal handling and processing,
royalties, commissions on coal trades, contract mining, and
rental income. With respect to other revenues recognized in
situations unrelated to the shipment of coal, we carefully
review the facts and circumstances of each transaction and apply
the relevant accounting literature as appropriate, and do not
recognize revenue until the following criteria are met:
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered; the sellers price
to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is
reasonably assured. Advance payments received are deferred and
recognized in revenue as coal is shipped or rental income is
earned.
52
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
Our primary expenses are wages and benefits, repair and
maintenance expenditures, diesel fuel purchases, blasting
supplies, coal transportation costs, cost of purchased coal,
royalties, freight and handling costs and taxes incurred in
selling our coal.
We have one reportable segment, coal mining operations, which
includes all of our revenues and costs from coal production and
sales, operations parts and shop services related to highwall
mining systems, freight and handling, rentals, royalties and
coal handling and processing services. We report the revenues
from the operation of highwall mining systems and coal handling
and processing in our other revenues category.
CERTAIN TRENDS AND ECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING THE COAL
INDUSTRY
Our revenues depend on the price at which we are able to sell
our coal. The current pricing environment for U.S. coal is
strong. Any decrease in coal prices due to, among other reasons,
the supply of domestic and foreign coal, the demand for
electricity and the price and availability of alternative fuels
for electricity generation could adversely affect our revenues
and our ability to generate cash flows. In addition, our results
of operations depend on the cost of coal production. We are
experiencing increased operating costs for fuel and explosives,
steel products, health care and contract labor. We expect to
experience higher costs for surety bonds and letters of credit.
In addition, historically low interest rates have had a negative
impact on expenses related to our actuarially determined
employee-related liabilities.
For additional information regarding some of the risks and
uncertainties that affect our business and the industry in which
we operate, and that apply to an investment in our common stock,
see Risk factors.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles that are generally accepted in the United
States. The preparation of these financial statements requires
management to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as
well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
Management evaluates its estimates on an on-going basis.
Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical
experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from the
estimates used. Note 2 to our audited consolidated
financial statements provides a description of all significant
accounting policies. We believe that of these significant
accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree
of judgment or complexity.
Reclamation
Our asset retirement obligations arise from the federal Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and similar state
statutes, which require that mine property be restored in
accordance with specified standards and an approved reclamation
plan. Significant reclamation activities include reclaiming
refuse and slurry ponds, reclaiming the pit and support acreage
at surface mines, and sealing portals at deep mines. We account
for the costs of our reclamation activities in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 143, Accounting for
Asset Retirement Obligations. We determine the future cash
flows necessary to satisfy our reclamation obligations on a
mine-by-mine basis based upon current permit requirements and
various estimates and assumptions, including estimates of
disturbed acreage, cost estimates, and assumptions regarding
productivity. Estimates of disturbed acreage are determined
based on approved mining plans and related engineering data.
Cost estimates are based upon third-party costs. Productivity
assumptions are based on historical experience with the
equipment that is expected to be utilized in the reclamation
activities. In accordance with the provisions of
53
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
SFAS No. 143, we determine the fair value of our asset
retirement obligations. In order to determine fair value, we
must also estimate a discount rate and third-party margin. Each
is discussed further below:
|
|
4 |
Discount rate. SFAS No. 143 requires that asset
retirement obligations be recorded at fair value. In accordance
with the provisions of SFAS No. 143, we utilize
discounted cash flow techniques to estimate the fair value of
our obligations. We base our discount rate on the rates of
treasury bonds with maturities similar to expected mine lives,
adjusted for our credit standing. |
|
4 |
Third-party margin. SFAS No. 143 requires the
measurement of an obligation to be based upon the amount a
third-party would demand to assume the obligation. Because we
plan to perform a significant amount of the reclamation
activities with internal resources, a third-party margin was
added to the estimated costs of these activities. This margin
was estimated based upon our historical experience with
contractors performing certain types of reclamation activities.
The inclusion of this margin will result in a recorded
obligation that is greater than our estimates of our cost to
perform the reclamation activities. If our cost estimates are
accurate, the excess of the recorded obligation over the cost
incurred to perform the work will be recorded as a gain at the
time that reclamation work is completed. |
On at least an annual basis, we review our entire reclamation
liability and make necessary adjustments for permit changes as
granted by state authorities, additional costs resulting from
accelerated mine closures and revisions to cost estimates and
productivity assumptions to reflect current experience. At
March 31, 2005, we had recorded asset retirement obligation
liabilities of $43.2 million, including amounts reported as
current liabilities. While the precise amount of these future
costs cannot be determined with certainty, as of March 31,
2005, we estimate that the aggregate undiscounted cost of final
mine closure is approximately $59.0 million.
Coal reserves
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating
quantities of economically recoverable coal reserves. Many of
these uncertainties are beyond our control. As a result,
estimates of economically recoverable coal reserves are by their
nature uncertain. Information about our reserves consists of
estimates based on engineering, economic and geological data
assembled by our internal engineers and geologists and reviewed
by a third-party consultant. We believe that the most important
factors and assumptions that impact economically recoverable
reserve estimates are:
|
|
4 |
geological conditions; |
|
4 |
historical production from the area compared with production
from other producing areas; |
|
4 |
the assumed effects of regulations and taxes by governmental
agencies; |
|
4 |
assumptions governing future demand and prices; and |
|
4 |
assumptions regarding future operating costs. |
Each of these factors may in fact vary considerably from the
assumptions used in estimating reserves. For these reasons,
estimates of the economically recoverable quantities of coal
attributable to a particular group of properties, and
classifications of these reserves based on risk of recovery and
estimates of future net cash flows, may vary substantially.
Actual production, revenues and expenditures with respect to
reserves will likely vary from estimates, and these variances
may be material.
54
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
Post-retirement medical benefits
All of our subsidiaries have long and short-term liabilities for
post-retirement benefit cost obligations. Detailed information
related to these liabilities is included in the notes to our
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. Liabilities for post-retirement benefits are not
funded. The liability is actuarially determined, and we use
various actuarial assumptions, including the discount rate and
future cost trends, to estimate the costs and obligations for
post-retirement benefits. The discount rate assumption reflects
the rates available on high quality fixed income debt
instruments. The discount rate used to determine the net
periodic benefit cost for post-retirement medical benefits was
5.75% for the year ended December 31, 2004. We make
assumptions related to future trends for medical care costs in
the estimates of retiree health care and work-related injury and
illness obligations. The future health care cost trend rate
represents the rate at which health care costs are expected to
increase over the life of the plan. The health care cost trend
rate assumptions are determined primarily based upon our
historical rate of change in retiree health care costs. The
post-retirement expense in the three month operating period
ended December 31, 2004 was based on an assumed heath care
inflationary rate of 10.0% in the three month operating period
decreasing to 5.0% in 2014, which represents the ultimate health
care cost trend rate for the remainder of the plan life. A
one-percentage point increase in the assumed ultimate health
care cost trend rate would increase the service and interest
cost components of the post-retirement benefit expense for the
three month operating period ended December 31, 2004 by
$0.2 million and increase the accumulated post-retirement
benefit obligation at December 31, 2004 by
$1.0 million. A one-percentage point decrease in the
assumed ultimate health care cost trend rate would decrease the
service and interest cost components of the post-retirement
benefit expense for the three month operating period ended
December 31, 2004 by $0.2 million and decrease the
accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation at
December 31, 2004 by $0.9 million. If our assumptions
do not materialize as expected, actual cash expenditures and
costs that we incur could differ materially from our current
estimates. Moreover, regulatory changes could increase our
requirement to satisfy these or additional obligations.
Workers compensation
Workers compensation is a system by which individuals who
sustain personal injuries due to job-related accidents are
compensated for their disabilities, medical costs and on some
occasions, for the costs of their rehabilitation, and by which
the survivors of workers who suffer fatal injuries receive
compensation for lost financial support. The workers
compensation laws are administered by state agencies with each
state having its own set of rules and regulations regarding
compensation that is owed to an employee who is injured in the
course of employment. Our operations are covered through a
combination of participation in a state run program and
insurance policies. Our estimates of these costs are adjusted
based upon actuarial studies. We have paid a $5.0 million
insurance premium to cover workers compensation losses not
covered by our large deductible stop loss insurance for the
period October 1, 2004 through September 30, 2005.
While our actuarial study indicates this amount is adequate to
cover expected losses during such period, losses in excess of
$7.0 million will require additional insurance premium of a
corresponding amount. Individual losses in excess of
$0.5 million are covered by our large deductible stop loss
insurance.
Coal workers pneumoconiosis
We are responsible under various federal statutes, and various
states statutes, for the payment of medical and disability
benefits to eligible employees resulting from occurrences of
coal workers pneumoconiosis disease (black lung). Our
operations are covered through a combination of a self-insurance
program, in which we are a participant in a state run program,
and an insurance policy. We accrue for any self-insured
liability by recognizing costs when it is probable that a
covered liability has
55
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
been incurred and the cost can be reasonably estimated. Our
estimates of these costs are adjusted based upon actuarial
studies. At March 31, 2005, we have recorded an accrual of
$10.6 million for black lung benefits. Individual losses in
excess of $0.5 million at the state level and
$1.0 million at the federal level are covered by our large
deductible stop loss insurance. Actual losses may differ from
these estimates, which could increase or decrease our costs.
Income taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary
differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets
and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires that
deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred
tax asset will not be realized. In evaluating the need for a
valuation allowance, we take into account various factors
including the expected level of future taxable income and
available tax planning strategies. If future taxable income is
lower than expected or if expected tax planning strategies are
not available as anticipated, we may record a change to the
valuation allowance through income tax expense in the period the
determination is made.
RESULTS OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Basis of presentation
Certain assets of Horizon and its subsidiaries were acquired by
ICG, Inc. as of September 30, 2004. The remaining Horizon
assets and all of its liabilities were transferred to A.T.
Massey Coal Company, Inc. and Lexington Coal Company. Due to the
change in ownership, and the resultant application of purchase
accounting, the historical financial statements of Horizon and
ICG, Inc. included in this prospectus have been prepared on
different bases for the periods presented and are not
comparable. In May 2002, Horizon, formerly operating as AEI
Resources, was reorganized.
The following provides a description of the basis of
presentation during all periods presented:
Successor ICG was formed on March 31, 2005 as
a holding company in order to effect the corporate
reorganization and the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions.
Predecessors Represents the consolidated financial
position of ICG, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and its
consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the period
from May 13 through December 31, 2004 and the
consolidated financial position (at the end of the period),
results of operations and cash flows for AEI Resources for the
period January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002 and for Horizon
for the period May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002, the
year ended December 31, 2003 and for the period
January 1 through September 30, 2004. ICG, Inc. had no
material assets, liabilities or results of operations until the
acquisition of certain assets from Horizon as of
September 30, 2004. ICG, Inc.s consolidated financial
position at December 31, 2004 and its consolidated results
of operations for the period ending December 31, 2004
reflect the purchase price allocation partially based on
appraisals prepared by independent valuation specialists and
employee benefit valuations prepared by independent actuaries.
The Horizon accounts receivable, advance royalties, accounts
payable and accrued expenses, intangibles, goodwill and other
assets and long-term liabilities were estimates of management.
An independent valuation specialist prepared appraisals of the
Horizon property, plant and equipment, coal reserves and accrued
reclamation obligations while employee benefit valuations were
prepared by independent actuaries; management allocated amounts
of the purchase price to these assets and liabilities using
these appraisals and valuations prepared by these specialists.
The application of purchase accounting to the acquired assets of
Horizon resulted in increases to coal inventories and the asset
arising from recognition of asset retirement obligations. It
56
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
also resulted in increases to plant and equipment, coal supply
agreements and goodwill and a decrease in deferred taxes. With
regard to consolidated results of operations for the three month
operating period ended December 31, 2004, the principal
effects of the application of purchase accounting, in comparison
to reporting for historical periods, were to increase the net
cost of coal sold by $1.4 million due to the revaluation of
coal inventories to market price as required by purchase
accounting.
In ICG, Inc.s consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2004, we recorded $183.9 million in
goodwill which represents the excess of costs over the fair
value of the net assets acquired from Horizon. We tested for
impairment of these assets in December 2004 and determined that
impairment review supported the carrying value of goodwill. We
will perform the next impairment test of this asset in December
2005. If the upcoming impairment review results in the
application of impairment adjustments, we will be required to
recognize these adjustments as operating expenses. As a result,
we would have to write-off the impaired portion which could
significantly reduce the value of our assets and reduce our net
income for the year in which the write-off occurs.
The financial statements for the predecessor periods of Horizon
and AEI have been prepared on a carve-out basis to
include the assets, liabilities and results of operations of
ICG, Inc. that were previously included in the consolidated
financial statements of Horizon. The financial statements for
the Horizon predecessor periods include allocations of certain
expenses, taxation charges, interest and cash balances relating
to Horizon based on managements estimates. The Horizon
predecessor financial information is not necessarily indicative
of the consolidated financial position, results of operations
and cash flows of ICG, Inc. if it had operated during the
predecessor period presented.
Three months ended March 31, 2005 of ICG, Inc. compared
to the three months ended March 31, 2004 of Horizon
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon | |
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Increase | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
($ or tons) | |
|
% change | |
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and per ton data) | |
Coal revenues
|
|
$ |
110,013 |
|
|
$ |
144,197 |
|
|
$ |
34,184 |
|
|
|
31% |
|
Freight and handling revenues
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
38% |
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
6,452 |
|
|
|
6,536 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
118,276 |
|
|
$ |
153,232 |
|
|
$ |
34,956 |
|
|
|
30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons sold
|
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
3,554 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
2% |
|
Coal revenues per ton
|
|
$ |
31.63 |
|
|
$ |
40.57 |
|
|
$ |
8.94 |
|
|
|
28% |
|
Coal revenues. ICG, Inc.s coal revenue increased in
the first three months of 2005 by $34.2 million, or 31%, to
$144.2 million, as compared to the first three months of
2004 for Horizon. This increase was due to an $8.94 per ton
increase in the average sales price of our coal in addition to a
slight increase in tons sold of 2% over the comparable period in
the prior year. The increase in the average sales price of our
coal was due to the general increase in coal prices during the
period as well as the favorable renegotiations of coal sales
contracts as a result of Horizons Chapter 11
bankruptcy.
Freight and handling revenues. Freight and handling
revenues increased $0.7 million for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The
increase is due to an increase in shipments where we pay the
freight and handling costs and are then reimbursed by the
customer.
57
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
Other revenues. Other revenues remained fairly constant
for the first quarter 2005 compared to the first quarter of
2004. Included in other revenue is income derived from our
highwall mining activities and related equipment repair services
performed by our subsidiary, ICG ADDCAR, LLC. Revenues from
highwall mining and related equipment repair services increased
to $6.5 million for the first three months of 2005 compared
to $4.1 million in the same period in 2004. This increase
was offset by a decrease in miscellaneous other revenues of
$2.1 million. Beginning January 1, 2005, ICG, Inc.
elected to reclassify miscellaneous other revenues (such as
royalty income and farming revenue) from the revenue
section of the income statement to miscellaneous other
income and expense.
Cost and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon | |
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Increase | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
($ or tons) | |
|
% change | |
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and per ton data) | |
Cost of coal sales and other revenues (exclusive of
depreciation, depletion and amortization)
|
|
$ |
98,002 |
|
|
$ |
117,184 |
|
|
$ |
19,182 |
|
|
|
20% |
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues as % of revenues
|
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
38% |
|
Freight and handling costs as % of revenues
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
9,502 |
|
|
|
8,522 |
|
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
(10% |
) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization as % of revenues
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of
depreciation, depletion and amortization)
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
4,935 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
101% |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses as % of
revenues
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$ |
111,584 |
|
|
$ |
133,140 |
|
|
|
21,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses as % of revenues
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of coal sales per ton sold
|
|
$ |
32.08 |
|
|
$ |
37.46 |
|
|
$ |
5.38 |
|
|
|
17% |
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues. In the first three
months of 2005, ICG, Inc.s cost of coal sales increased
$19.2 million, or 20%, to $117.2 million compared to
$98.0 million in the comparable period of the prior year.
The increase in cost of coal sales is primarily a result of
increases in prices for steel-related mine supplies, increasing
costs for roof control supplies ($0.9 million), escalating
diesel fuel costs ($2.1 million), increasing costs for
repairs and maintenance ($1.1 million), increasing variable
sales-related costs ($3.3 million), such as royalties and
severance taxes related to increased sale realizations and
increases in trucking costs ($3.0 million) and lower
expenditures for final reclamation ($2.0 million). In
addition, salary and hourly payroll expense increased
($2.6 million) to maintain a competitive compensation
program. Payroll taxes and other employee benefits increased
primarily due to higher workers compensation premiums
($0.9 million) and an increase in group insurance expense
($0.4 million). The average cost per ton sold increased 17%
from $32.08 per ton in the first three months of 2004 to
$37.46 per ton in the first three months of 2005. The cost
of coal sales as a percentage of coal revenues decreased to 76%
for the first three months of 2005 compared to 83% in 2004.
Freight and handling costs. Freight and handling costs
increased $0.7 million to $2.5 million during the
first three months of 2005 compared to the first three months of
2004, mainly due to the increase
58
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
in shipments where ICG, Inc. initially pays the freight and
handling costs and is then reimbursed by the customer.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. Depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense decreased $1.0 million
to $8.5 million in the first three months of 2005 compared
to $9.5 million in the first three months of 2004.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization per ton decreased from
$2.73 per ton in the first three months of 2004 to
$2.40 per ton in the first three months of 2005. The
principal components of the decrease were a $1.1 million
decrease in depletion and a $1.6 million decrease in
connection with a change in accounting practice related to the
capitalization and amortization of major repair costs in excess
of $25,000 per occurrence. AEI Resources, predecessor to
Horizon, had been deferring and amortizing major component
rebuild costs over 15 months, its estimated useful life.
Effective January 1, 2004, Horizon management decided to
discontinue deferring major component rebuild costs and to
expense the cost when incurred. This decision was based on the
fact that estimated future benefits of the cost may not be
realizable. The impact for the three months ended March 31,
2005 versus the three months ended March 31, 2004 was a
decrease of $1.6 million due to the remaining value of
capitalized assets during the first quarter of 2004. In
addition, ICG, Inc. experienced an increase in depreciation and
amortization expense of $1.9 million offsetting the above
decreases. Depreciation expense increased in the first quarter
of 2005 due to an increase capital expenditures and shortened
depreciable asset lives of the Horizon equipment purchased by
ICG, Inc. in September 2004.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 were $4.9 million compared to
$2.5 million for the three months ended March 31,
2004. The increase of $2.5 million is primarily
attributable to an increase in professional, consulting and
administrative fees.
Three months ended December 31, 2003 of Horizon compared
to three months ended December 31, 2004 of ICG, Inc.
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon | |
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Increase | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
($ or tons) | |
|
% change | |
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and per ton data) | |
Coal revenues
|
|
$ |
111,428 |
|
|
$ |
130,463 |
|
|
$ |
19,305 |
|
|
|
17% |
|
Freight and handling revenues
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
(28% |
) |
Other revenues
|
|
|
6,398 |
|
|
|
4,766 |
|
|
|
(1,632 |
) |
|
|
(26% |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
119,047 |
|
|
$ |
136,109 |
|
|
$ |
17,062 |
|
|
|
14% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons sold
|
|
|
3,855 |
|
|
|
3,582 |
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
(7% |
) |
Coal sales realization per ton sold
|
|
$ |
28.90 |
|
|
$ |
36.42 |
|
|
$ |
7.52 |
|
|
|
26% |
|
Coal revenues. ICG, Inc.s coal revenues increased
in the last three months of 2004 by $19.3 million, or 17%,
to $130.5 million, as compared to the last three months of
2003 for Horizon. This increase was due to a $7.52 per ton
increase in the average sales price of our coal, partially
offset by a sales tons decrease of 0.3 million tons, or 7%,
over the comparable period last year. The increase in the
average sales price of our coal was due to the general increase
in coal prices during the period as well as the favorable
renegotiations of coal sales contracts as a result of
Horizons Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Freight and handling revenues. Freight and handling
revenues decreased to $0.9 million for the period ended
December 31, 2004 for ICG, Inc. a decrease of
$0.3 million compared to the period
59
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
ended December 31, 2003 for Horizon, due to a decrease in
shipments where ICG, Inc. pays the freight and handling costs
and is then reimbursed by the customer.
Other revenues. Other revenues of ICG, Inc. decreased for
the last three months of 2004 by $1.6 million, or 26%, to
$4.8 million, as compared to the last three months of 2003
for Horizon, primarily due to a $1.4 million decrease in
highwall miner lease revenue.
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon | |
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Increase | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
($ or tons) | |
|
% change | |
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and per ton data) | |
Cost of coal sales and other revenues (exclusive of
depreciation, depletion and amortization)
|
|
$ |
100,267 |
|
|
$ |
113,707 |
|
|
$ |
13,440 |
|
|
|
13% |
|
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues as % of revenues
|
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
$ |
1,221 |
|
|
$ |
880 |
|
|
$ |
(341 |
) |
|
|
(28% |
) |
|
Freight and handling costs as % of revenues
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
$ |
13,230 |
|
|
$ |
7,943 |
|
|
$ |
(5,287 |
) |
|
|
(40% |
) |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization as % of revenues
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of
depreciation, depletion and amortization)
|
|
$ |
4,873 |
|
|
$ |
4,194 |
|
|
$ |
(679 |
) |
|
|
(14% |
) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses as % of
revenues
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
$ |
(2,260 |
) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
|
(100% |
) |
Writedowns and other items
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(203 |
) |
|
|
(100% |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$ |
117,534 |
|
|
$ |
126,714 |
|
|
$ |
9,180 |
|
|
|
8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses as % of revenues
|
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of coal sales per ton sold
|
|
$ |
30.49 |
|
|
$ |
35.38 |
|
|
$ |
4.89 |
|
|
|
16% |
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues. In the last three
months of 2004, ICG, Inc.s cost of coal sales, which
excludes charges for depreciation, depletion and amortization,
increased $13.4 million, or 13%, to $113.7 million
compared to the last three months of 2003 for Horizon. ICG,
Inc.s cost of coal sales increased primarily as a result
of increased prices for steel-related mine supplies, escalating
diesel fuel costs ($1.9 million), increasing costs for
repair and maintenance of an aging equipment fleet
($2.8 million), increased coal trucking costs
($2.7 million) and increased variable sales-related costs
($2.2 million), such as royalties and severance taxes
related to increased sale realizations. The average cost per ton
sold increased 16% from $30.49 per ton in the last three
months of 2003 to $35.38 per ton in the last three months
of 2004. ICG, Inc.s cost of coal sales as a percentage of
coal revenues remained constant at 84% for the last three months
of both 2003 and 2004.
Freight and handling costs. Freight and handling costs
decreased $0.3 million to $0.9 million during the last
three months of 2004 as compared to the last three months of
2003, mainly due to the decrease in shipments where ICG, Inc.
initially pays the freight and handling costs and is then
reimbursed by the customer.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. Depreciation,
depletion, and amortization decreased $5.3 million, or 40%,
to $7.9 million for the last three months of 2004 as
compared to the last three months of 2003. Depreciation,
depletion and amortization per ton decreased from $3.43 per
ton in the last three months of 2003 to $2.22 per ton in
the last three months of 2004. The principal components of the
decrease were a $3.1 million decrease in amortization
related to an above market contract that expired at the end of
2003, as well as a $1.5 million decrease in connection with
a change in accounting practice related to the capitalization
and amortization of major repair costs in excess of
$25,000 per occurrence. AEI Resources, predecessor to
Horizon, had been deferring and
60
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
amortizing major component rebuild costs over 15 months,
its estimated useful life. Effective January 1, 2004,
Horizon management decided to discontinue deferring major
component rebuild costs and to expense the cost when incurred.
This decision was based on the fact that estimated future
benefits of the cost may not be realizable. The impact for the
three months ended December 31, 2003 versus the three
months ended December 31, 2004 was a decrease of
$1.5 million.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased $0.7 million,
or 14%, to $4.2 million in the last three months of 2004
compared to the same period in 2003 for Horizon. This reduction
was due in large part to a significant reduction in salary
expense for senior management for the period. ICG, Inc.s
selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of
total revenues decreased from 4.0% in the last three months of
2003 to 3.0% in the last three months of 2004.
Gain on sale of assets. Gain on sale of assets decreased
$2.3 million from a gain of $2.3 million in last three
months of 2003 to a gain of $0.01 million in the last three
months of 2004. The gain on sale of assets in 2003 occurred in
relation to the sale of the Hannah Land property, also known as
the Republic Reserve, which was acquired by A. T. Massey.
Writedowns and other items. Writedowns and other items
decreased $0.2 million in the last three months of 2004 as
compared to the same period in 2003.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$32.4 million to $3.5 million during the last three
months of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 for Horizon.
The decrease was mainly due to the elimination of approximately
$915 million of debt through our Horizons
Chapter 11 bankruptcy. This debt was replaced with a
$175 million term loan that ICG, Inc. entered into at the
closing of the Horizon acquisition.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 of Horizon Compared
to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 of Horizon.
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
Increase | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
($ or tons) | |
|
% change | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and per ton data) | |
Coal revenues
|
|
$ |
329,863 |
|
|
$ |
346,981 |
|
|
$ |
17,118 |
|
|
|
5% |
|
Freight and handling revenues
|
|
|
6,786 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
(3,086 |
) |
|
|
(45% |
) |
Other revenues
|
|
|
25,373 |
|
|
|
22,702 |
|
|
|
(2,671 |
) |
|
|
(11% |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
362,022 |
|
|
$ |
373,383 |
|
|
$ |
11,361 |
|
|
|
3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons sold
|
|
|
12,801 |
|
|
|
10,421 |
|
|
|
(2,380 |
) |
|
|
(19% |
) |
Coal sales realization per ton sold
|
|
$ |
25.77 |
|
|
$ |
33.30 |
|
|
$ |
7.53 |
|
|
|
29% |
|
Coal revenues. Coal revenues increased in the first nine
months of 2004 by $17.1 million, or 5%, to
$347.0 million, as compared to the first nine months of
2003. This increase was due to a $7.53 per ton increase in
the average sales price of Horizons coal, partially offset
by a sales tons decrease of 2.4 million tons, or 19%, over
the comparable period last year. The principal reason for the
reduction in sales tons in the first nine months of 2004 over
2003 is due to the elimination of 1.3 million tons of
synfuel sales in 2004. The increase in the average sales price
of our coal was due to the general increase in coal prices
during 2004, as well as the favorable renegotiations of coal
sales contracts related to Horizons Chapter 11
bankruptcy.
Freight and handling revenues. Freight and handling
revenues decreased to $3.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2004, a decrease of $3.1 million
compared to the period ended
61
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
September 30, 2003 due to a decrease in shipments where
Horizon paid the freight and handling costs and was then
reimbursed by the customer.
Other revenues. Other revenues decreased for the first
nine months of 2004 by $2.7 million, or 11%, to
$22.7 million, as compared to the first nine months of 2003
primarily due to a $2.4 million decrease in highwall miner
lease revenue.
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
(decrease) | |
|
% change | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and per ton data) | |
Cost of coal sales and other revenues (exclusive of
depreciation, depletion and amortization)
|
|
$ |
300,386 |
|
|
$ |
306,429 |
|
|
$ |
6,043 |
|
|
|
2% |
|
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues as % of revenues
|
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
$ |
6,786 |
|
|
$ |
3,700 |
|
|
$ |
(3,086 |
) |
|
|
(45% |
) |
|
Freight and handling costs as % of revenues
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
$ |
39,023 |
|
|
$ |
27,547 |
|
|
$ |
(11,476 |
) |
|
|
(29% |
) |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization as % of revenues
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of
depreciation, depletion and amortization)
|
|
$ |
18,478 |
|
|
$ |
8,477 |
|
|
$ |
(10,001 |
) |
|
|
(54% |
) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses as % of
revenues
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
$ |
(2,060 |
) |
|
$ |
(226 |
) |
|
$ |
1,834 |
|
|
|
(89% |
) |
Writedowns and other items
|
|
$ |
8,897 |
|
|
$ |
10,018 |
|
|
$ |
1,121 |
|
|
|
13% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$ |
371,510 |
|
|
$ |
355,945 |
|
|
$ |
(15,565 |
) |
|
|
(4% |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses as % of revenues
|
|
|
103 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of coal sales per ton sold
|
|
$ |
29.02 |
|
|
$ |
34.16 |
|
|
$ |
5.14 |
|
|
|
18% |
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues. In the first nine
months of 2004, Horizons cost of coal sales, which
excludes charges for depreciation, depletion and amortization,
increased $6.0 million, or 2%, to $306.4 million
compared to the first nine months of 2003. Horizons cost
of coal sales increased by approximately $6.0 million
primarily as a result of increased prices for steel-related mine
supplies, escalating diesel fuel costs ($5.2 million),
increasing costs for repair and maintenance of an aging
equipment fleet ($10.7 million), increased coal trucking
costs ($2.9 million) and increased variable sales-related
costs, such as royalties and severance taxes
($4.2 million). These increased costs were offset by volume
related decreases in purchased coal cost ($22.3 million).
The average cost per ton sold increased 18% from $29.02 per
ton in the first nine months of 2003 to $34.16 per ton in
the first nine months of 2004. Horizons cost of coal sales
as a percentage of coal revenues decreased from 83% in the first
nine months of 2003 to 82% in the first nine months of 2004.
Freight and handling costs. Freight and handling costs
decreased $3.1 million to $3.7 million during the
first nine months of 2004 as compared to the first nine months
of 2003, mainly due to the decrease in shipments where Horizon
paid the freight and handling costs and was then reimbursed by
the customer.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. Depreciation,
depletion and amortization decreased $11.5 million, or 29%,
to $27.5 million for the first nine months of 2004 as
compared to the first nine months of 2003. Depreciation,
depletion and amortization per ton decreased from $3.05 per
ton in the first nine months of 2003 to $2.64 per ton in
the first nine months of 2004. The principal components of the
decrease were a $6.3 million decrease in amortization
related to an above market contract that expired at the end of
2003, as well as a $1.6 million decrease in connection with
a change in accounting practice related to the capitalization
and amortization of major repair costs in excess of
$25,000 per occurrence. AEI Resources, predecessor to
Horizon, had been deferring and amortizing major component
rebuild costs over 15 months, its estimated useful life.
Effective
62
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
January 1, 2004, Horizon management decided to discontinue
deferring major component rebuild costs and to expense the cost
when incurred. This decision was based on the fact that
estimated future benefits of the cost may not be realizable. The
impact for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 versus
the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was a decrease of
$1.6 million.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased
$10.0 million, or 54%, to $8.5 million in the first
nine months of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. The
decrease is primarily attributed to decreased general and
supervisory salaries ($1.7 million), reduction in building
rent ($0.7 million) as operations were consolidated to two
floors reducing total square footage utilized, reduced taxes and
licenses ($0.8 million), reduced sales commissions
($1.1 million), reduced bad debt expense
($3.6 million), decreased consulting fees, attorney fees
and professional services ($0.9 million).
Gain on sale of assets. Gain on sale of assets decreased
$1.8 million from a gain of $2.1 million in first nine
months of 2003 to a gain of $0.2 million in the first nine
months of 2004. The gain on sale of assets in 2003 occurred in
relation to the sale of the Hannah Land property, which was
acquired by A. T. Massey
Writedowns and other items. Writedowns and other items
increased $1.1 million in the first nine months of 2004 as
compared to the same period in 2003.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased
$4.2 million to $114.2 million during the first nine
months of 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003. This
increase was primarily due to default interest on unpaid
interest amounts.
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2002 of Predecessor
Compared to Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2003 of
Predecessor
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Increase | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
2002(1) | |
|
2003 | |
|
($ or tons) | |
|
% change | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages | |
|
|
and per ton data) | |
Coal revenues
|
|
$ |
400,275 |
|
|
$ |
441,291 |
|
|
$ |
41,016 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
Freight and handling revenues
|
|
|
8,979 |
|
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
|
(11% |
) |
Other revenues
|
|
|
48,580 |
|
|
|
31,771 |
|
|
|
(16,809 |
) |
|
|
(35% |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
457,834 |
|
|
$ |
481,070 |
|
|
$ |
23,236 |
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons sold
|
|
|
16,540 |
|
|
|
16,655 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1% |
|
Coal sales realization per ton sold
|
|
$ |
24.20 |
|
|
$ |
26.50 |
|
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
|
10% |
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents the combination of amounts for the period
January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002 with the amounts for
the period May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002. |
Coal revenues. Coal revenues increased for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2003 by $41.0 million or
10%, to $441.3 million, as compared to the twelve months
ended December 31, 2002. This increase was due to a
$2.30 per ton increase in the average sales price of
Horizons coal. The increase in the average sales price of
Horizons coal was due to the general increase in coal
prices during the latter part of 2003, as well as the favorable
renegotiations of coal sales contracts related to Horizons
Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Freight and handling revenues. Freight and handling
revenues decreased to $8.0 million for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of $1.0 million
compared to the twelve months
63
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
ended December 31, 2002 due to a decrease in shipments
where Horizon paid the freight and handling costs and was then
reimbursed by the customer.
Other revenues. Other revenues decreased for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2003 by $16.8 million, or
35%, to $31.8 million, as compared to the same period in
2002. This decrease is primarily due to a $10.9 million
decrease in revenue related to our highwall mining subsidiary
and a decrease of $3.6 million in synfuel earnings.
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
(decrease) | |
|
% change | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages and per ton data) | |
Cost of coal sales and other revenues (exclusive of
depreciation, depletion and amortization)
|
|
$ |
366,128 |
|
|
$ |
400,652 |
|
|
$ |
34,524 |
|
|
|
9% |
|
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues as % of revenues
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
$ |
8,979 |
|
|
$ |
8,008 |
|
|
$ |
(971 |
) |
|
|
(11% |
) |
|
Freight and handling costs as % of revenues
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
$ |
72,350 |
|
|
$ |
52,254 |
|
|
$ |
(20,096 |
) |
|
|
(28% |
) |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization as % of revenues
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of
depreciation, depletion and amortization)
|
|
$ |
26,372 |
|
|
$ |
23,350 |
|
|
$ |
(3,022 |
) |
|
|
(11% |
) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses as % of
revenues
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
$ |
(132 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,320 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,188 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Writedowns and other items
|
|
$ |
738,275 |
|
|
$ |
9,100 |
|
|
$ |
(729,175 |
) |
|
|
(99% |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$ |
1,211,972 |
|
|
$ |
489,044 |
|
|
$ |
(722,928 |
) |
|
|
(60% |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses as % of revenues
|
|
|
265 |
% |
|
|
102 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of coal sales per ton sold
|
|
$ |
73.28 |
|
|
$ |
29.36 |
|
|
$ |
(43.92 |
) |
|
|
(60% |
) |
Cost of coal sales and other revenues. In the twelve
months ended December 31, 2003, Horizons cost of coal
sales, which excludes costs for depreciation, depletion and
amortization, increased $34.5 million, or 9%, to
$400.7 million compared to the twelve months ended
December 31, 2002. Horizons cost of coal sales
increased by approximately $34.5 million primarily as a
result of increased prices for steel-related mine supplies,
escalating diesel fuel costs ($3.9 million), increased cost
of blasting materials ($1.8 million), increased equipment
rental costs ($2.9 million) and increased variable
sales-related costs, such as royalties and severance taxes
($0.8 million). These increased costs were offset by volume
related increases in purchased coal cost ($22.1 million).
The average cost per ton sold decreased 60% from $73.28 per
ton in 2002 to $29.36 per ton in the same period of 2003.
The per ton cost in 2002 was impacted by writedowns and other
items that related to Horizons bankruptcy. Horizons
cost of coal sales as a percentage of coal revenues increased
from 80% in 2002 to 83% in 2003.
Freight and handling costs. Freight and handling costs
decreased $1.0 million, or 11%, to $8.0 million
compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2002,
mainly due to the decrease in shipments where Horizon paid the
freight and handling costs and was then reimbursed by the
customer.
64
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. Depreciation,
depletion and amortization decreased $20.0 million, or 28%,
to $52.3 million for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization per ton decreased from
$4.37 per ton in 2002 to $3.14 per ton in 2003. The
principal components of the decrease were a reduction of
$7.4 million in depreciation as original asset lives were
fully depreciated and not replaced with new assets due to cash
constraints related to Horizons Chapter 11
bankruptcy, as well as a $3.2 million decrease related to
the amortization of major repair costs. Depletion in 2003 was
$9.2 million less than the same period in 2002 due to a
change in depletion rates as a result of Horizons first
Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased $3.0 million,
or 11%, to $23.3 million in the twelve months ended
December 31, 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002.
The decrease is attributed to reduced bad debt expense
($0.9 million) and a $1.7 million decrease in general
and supervisory bonuses.
Gain on sale of assets. Gain on sale of assets increased
$4.2 million from a gain of $0.1 million in 2002 to a
gain of $4.3 million in 2003. The gain on sale of assets in
2003 occurred in relation to the sale of Cyrus Dock
($3.1 million), and the Hannah Land property
($2.2 million), which was acquired by A.T. Massey,
partially offset by a loss on sale of the Blue Springs property
($1.1 million).
Writedowns and other items. Writedowns and other items
decreased $729.2 million in the 2003 as compared to 2002
due to the write-off of goodwill ($697.1 million).
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
$28.8 million to $145.9 million during 2003 as
compared to the same period in 2002. This increase was primarily
due to default interest on unpaid interest amounts.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our business is capital intensive and requires substantial
capital expenditures for, among other things, purchasing,
upgrading and maintaining equipment used in developing and
mining our reserve base, as well as remaining in compliance with
environmental laws and regulations. Our principal liquidity
requirement is to finance our coal production, fund capital
expenditures and to service our debt and reclamation
obligations. We may also engage in acquisitions from time to
time. Our primary sources of liquidity to meet these needs are
cash flow from sales of our coal, other income and borrowings
under our senior credit facility.
We believe the principal indicators of our liquidity are our
cash position and remaining availability under our credit
facility. As of March 31, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions), our available liquidity was
$95.1 million, including cash of $35.0 million and
$60.1 million available under our credit facility. Total
debt represented 32% of our total capitalization at
March 31, 2005, pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions and without giving effect to this offering. Our
total capitalization represents our current short- and long-term
debt combined with our total stockholders equity.
As of December 31, 2004, our leased equipment was, on
average, 8.5 years old. We believe that a significant
portion of our equipment needs to be upgraded in the near-term.
We currently expect our capital expenditures to be approximately
$139 million for 2005, approximately $46 million of
which has been incurred through April 2005, and approximately
$166 million in 2006, primarily for investments in new
equipment and for mining development operations. We expect to
fund these capital expenditures for the next two years from our
internal operations. As we take advantage of planned expansion
opportunities from 2007 through 2009 principally as a result of
the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions, we expect to spend
approximately $627 million on capital expenditures, which
may
65
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
require external financing. However, our capital expenditures
may be different than currently anticipated depending upon the
size and nature of new business opportunities and actual cash
flows generated by our operations.
In ICG, Inc.s consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2004, we recorded $183.9 million in
goodwill which represents the excess of costs over the fair
value of the net assets acquired from Horizon. We tested for
impairment of these assets in December 2004 and determined that
impairment review supported the carrying value of goodwill. We
will perform the next impairment test of this asset in December
2005. If the upcoming impairment review results in the
application of impairment adjustments, we will be required to
recognize these adjustments as operating expenses. As a result,
we would have to write-off the impaired portion which could
significantly reduce the value of our assets and reduce our net
income for the year in which the write-off occurs.
Cash flows
Cash provided by operating activities was $21.8 million for
the first three months of 2005, an increase of $4.8 million
from the same period in 2004. Cash provided by operations for
the first three months of 2005 benefited from the strength of
the coal markets during the period. This increase is
attributable to an increase in net income of $20.0 million
for the first three months of 2005 compared to the same period
in 2004, and the effects of a $14.3 million reduction in
net operating assets and liabilities primarily related to
accrued interest charges in 2004.
Cash used in investing activities for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 was
$18.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Cash was
used in investing activities for the first three months of 2005
to begin replacement of ICG, Inc.s aged mining equipment
fleet as part of ICG, Inc.s capital expenditure program to
invest in new equipment.
Cash used in financing activities of $2.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 was primarily due to
repayments on our short- and long-term debt related to financing
of our general liability insurance program ($2.1 million)
and capital leases ($0.2 million). Cash used in financing
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was
$15.6 million comprised of $11.8 million in net
repayments on Horizons debtor-in-possession financing
facility, $3.6 million in net repayments on long-term debt
and $0.2 million in net repayments on capital leases.
Cash provided by operating activities was $30.2 million for
the last three months of 2004, an increase of $26.1 million
from the same period in 2003. Cash provided by operations for
the last three months of 2004 benefited from the strength of the
coal markets during the period. This increase is attributable to
an increase in net income of $69.3 million for the last
three months of 2004 over the same period the previous year, and
the effects of a $42.3 million reduction in net operating
assets and liabilities primarily related to decreases in
receivables and inventories in 2004 and accrued interest charges
in 2003.
Net cash used in investing activities was $329.2 million
during the last three months of 2004 as compared to cash of
$4.1 million generated by investing activities in the year
ended December 31, 2003. Cash used in investing activities
of $323.6 million was for the purchase of certain assets of
Horizon in the last three months of 2004, including goodwill of
$183.9 million. Capital expenditures were virtually
unchanged between the two periods, with the increase in cash
generated in the last three months of 2003 related to the sale
of assets during Horizons Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Net cash provided by financing activities was
$322.9 million in the last three months of 2004 compared
with net cash used by financing activities of $10.9 million
in the prior period. The increase in financing activities was a
result of the initial capital contribution of
$150.2 million and borrowings of $175 million used in
the purchase of certain Horizon assets. Net cash used in
financing activities by
66
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
Horizon in 2003 related to the use of proceeds from the sale of
assets to pay down debtor-in-possession financing related to
Horizons Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Cash provided by operating activities was $17.8 million for
the full year 2003, an increase of $239.6 million from the
same period in 2002. This increase is attributable to the
effects of a $905.7 million change in non-cash items
related to Horizons first Chapter 11 bankruptcy case,
a decrease in net income of $761.0 million for 2003 as
compared to the same period in 2002, and the effects of a
$94.9 million increase in net operating assets and
liabilities primarily related to accrued interest charges in
2003.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased
$22.1 million in 2003 to $1.6 million as compared to
$23.6 million in 2002. This decrease is the result of
decreased capital expenditures of $7.5 million as well as
an increase in proceeds from the sale of assets of
$14.6 million in 2003.
Net cash used in financing activities decreased
$196.4 million in 2003 to $15.5 million as compared to
a source of cash of $180.9 million in 2002. This change is
entirely related to various debt transactions in 2002 related to
Horizons first Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
On a pro forma basis after giving effect to the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions, our cash interest expense for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, would have been $10.5 million and
$3.1 million, respectively. For additional information on
how the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions impact our financial
condition see Unaudited consolidated pro forma financial
data.
We will use a portion of the proceeds of this offering to repay
all of our $209.6 million term loan facility outstanding,
as of March 31, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions). Our remaining net proceeds are expected to be
used for general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion
of the remaining proceeds to pursue possible acquisitions of
businesses, technologies, products or assets complementary to
our business.
Credit facility and long-term debt obligations
As of December 31, 2004, our total long-term indebtedness,
including capital lease obligations, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Term loan due 2010
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
(1) |
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
681 |
|
Other
|
|
|
3,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$ |
179,468 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(6,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
$ |
173,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
We are required to use 50% of the net proceeds of this
offering to repay amounts outstanding under the term loan. |
67
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
On September 30, 2004 (later amended and restated on
November 5, 2004), ICG, LLC, entered into a credit facility
with a group of lending institutions, for which UBS
Securities LLC serves as Arranger, Bookmanager and
Syndication Agent. The $285.0 million credit facility
currently provides for a term loan of $175.0 million and a
revolving credit facility of up to $110.0 million with a
letter of credit sub-limit of up to $60.0 million. As of
March 31, 2005, ICG, Inc.s $174.6 million term
loan principal amount was outstanding and letters of credit
totaling $49.9 million were outstanding under the revolving
credit facility, leaving $60.1 million available for
borrowing on the revolving credit facility. The interest rate on
both the term loan and revolving credit facility bear interest
at a variable rate based upon either the prime rate or a London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), in each case plus a spread that
is dependent on our leverage ratio. The interest rate applicable
to our borrowings under the term loan was 5.36% as of
March 31, 2005. The principal balance of the term loan is
due on October 1, 2010 and the revolving credit facility
expires on October 1, 2009. ICG and each of the
subsidiaries of ICG, LLC, have guaranteed ICG, LLCs
obligations under the credit facility. The obligations of ICG,
LLC, under the credit facility are secured by a lien on all of
the assets of ICG, ICG, LLC and their subsidiaries. We must pay
an annual commitment fee up to a maximum of
1/2
of 1% of the unused portion of the commitment under the
revolving credit facility. We were in compliance with our debt
covenants under the credit facility as of March 31, 2005.
The credit facility imposes certain restrictions on us,
including restrictions on our ability to: incur debt, grant
liens, enter into agreements with negative pledge clauses,
provide guarantees in respect of obligations of any other
person, pay dividends and make other distributions, make loans,
investments, advances and acquisitions, sell our assets, make
redemptions and repurchases of capital stock, make capital
expenditures, prepay, redeem or repurchase debt, liquidate or
dissolve; engage in mergers or consolidations, engage in
affiliate transactions, change our business, change our fiscal
year, amend certain debt and other material agreements, issue
and sell capital stock of subsidiaries, engage in sale and
leaseback transactions, and restrict distributions from
subsidiaries. In addition, the credit facility provides that we
must comply with certain covenants, including certain interest
coverage ratios. For a more detailed description of these
ratios, see Description of indebtedness.
At March 31, 2005, ICG, Inc. had $49.9 million in
letters of credit outstanding, all of which are supported by our
current $60.0 million letter of credit sub-limit contained
in our $285.0 million credit facility. We paid
$0.3 million in interest on our credit facility on
October 10, 2004, the first scheduled interest payment date
on the credit facility and another $2.4 million in interest
on our credit facility on January 10, 2005. We also made a
term loan amortization payment of $0.4 million on
January 10, 2005, which was the first scheduled
amortization payment date.
We are currently in the process of amending our credit facility
to increase the amount of our term loan facility by
$35.0 million and the amount of the sub-limit for letters
of credit by $15.0 million. We also expect that some of our
financial covenant requirements will be modified in connection
with the amendment to the credit agreement. See
Description of indebtedness. We expect this
amendment to increase our borrowing availability and enhance our
liquidity.
As a regular part of our business, we review opportunities for,
and engage in discussions and negotiations concerning, the
acquisition of coal mining assets and interests in coal mining
companies, and acquisitions of, or combinations with, coal
mining companies. When we believe that these opportunities are
consistent with our growth plans and our acquisition criteria,
we will make bids or proposals and/or enter into letters of
intent and other similar agreements, which may be binding or
nonbinding, that are customarily subject to a variety of
conditions and usually permit us to terminate the discussions
and any related agreement if, among other things, we are not
satisfied with the results of our due diligence investigation.
Any acquisition opportunities we pursue could materially affect
our liquidity and capital resources and may require us to incur
indebtedness, seek equity capital or both. There can be no
assurance that additional financing will be available on terms
acceptable to us, or at all.
68
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
Additionally, we have long-term liabilities relating to mine
reclamation, end-of-mine closure costs and black
lung costs, and all of our operating and
management-services subsidiaries have long-term liabilities
relating to retiree health care (post-retirement benefits).
Our ability to meet our long-term debt obligations will depend
upon our future performance, which in turn, will depend upon
general economic, financial and business conditions, along with
competition, legislation and regulation factors that are
largely beyond our control. Based upon our current operations,
the historical results of our predecessors, as well as those of
Anker and CoalQuest, we believe that cash flow from operations,
together with other available sources of funds, including
additional borrowings under our credit facility and the proceeds
from this offering, will be adequate for at least the next
12 months for making required payments of principal and
interest on our indebtedness and for funding anticipated capital
expenditures and working capital requirements. However, we
cannot assure you that our operating results, cash flow and
capital resources will be sufficient for repayment of our debt
obligations in the future.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following is a summary of our significant future contractual
obligations by year as of December 31, 2004, on a pro forma
basis after giving effect to the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
More than | |
|
|
|
|
1 year | |
|
1-3 years | |
|
3-5 years | |
|
5 years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$ |
7,417 |
|
|
$ |
5,739 |
|
|
$ |
5,253 |
|
|
$ |
199,523 |
|
|
$ |
217,932 |
|
Capital leases obligations
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
681 |
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
13,506 |
|
|
|
12,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,564 |
|
Coal purchase obligation
|
|
|
114,620 |
|
|
|
134,389 |
|
|
|
57,644 |
|
|
|
25,186 |
|
|
|
331,839 |
|
Advisory Services
agreement(1)
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
Minimum royalties
|
|
|
8,567 |
|
|
|
15,688 |
|
|
|
14,016 |
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
|
|
68,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(2)
|
|
$ |
146,623 |
|
|
$ |
172,042 |
|
|
$ |
80,913 |
|
|
$ |
258,367 |
|
|
$ |
657,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
See Certain relationships and related party
transactions. |
|
(2) |
Our contractual obligations exclude interest amounts due for
the years shown above because it is at a variable rate. We are
also a party to an employment agreement with each of our
President and Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice
President and General Counsel. See Management
Employment agreements regarding the terms and conditions
of this employment agreement. |
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In the normal course of business, we are a party to certain
off-balance sheet arrangements. These arrangements include
guarantees and financial instruments with off-balance sheet
risk, such as bank letters of credit and performance or surety
bonds. No liabilities related to these arrangements are
reflected in our combined balance sheets, and we do not expect
any material adverse effects on our financial condition, results
of operations or cash flows to result from these off-balance
sheet arrangements.
Federal and state laws require us to secure payment of certain
long-term obligations such as mine closure and reclamation
costs, federal and state workers compensation, coal leases
and other obligations. We typically secure these payment
obligations by using surety bonds, an off-balance sheet
instrument. The use of surety bonds is less expensive for us
than the alternative of posting a 100% cash bond or a bank
letter of credit, either of which would require a greater use of
our credit facility.
69
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
We then use bank letters of credit to secure our surety bonding
obligations as a lower cost alternative than securing those
bonds with cash. ICG, Inc. currently has a $60.0 million
committed bonding facility pursuant to which we are required to
provide bank letters of credit in an amount up to 50% of the
aggregate bond liability. Recently, surety bond costs have
increased, while the market terms of surety bonds have generally
become less favorable to us. To the extent that surety bonds
become unavailable, we would seek to secure our reclamation
obligations with letters of credit, cash deposits or other
suitable forms of collateral.
As of March 31, 2005, ICG, Inc. had outstanding surety
bonds with third parties for post-mining reclamation totaling
$82.9 million plus $1.7 million for miscellaneous
purposes. ICG, Inc. maintained letters of credit as of
March 31, 2005 totaling $50.2 million to secure
reclamation surety bonds and other obligations, including
$10.0 million related to Lexington Coal Company. Of the
$50.2 million, $49.9 million of these letters of
credit are issued under our current $60.0 million bonding
facility with another approximately $300,000 of letters of
credit which are cash collateralized and issued by a third party
bank.
INFLATION
Inflation in the United States has been relatively low in recent
years and did not have a material impact on result of operations
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, twelve
months ended December 31, 2003, twelve months ended
December 31, 2002 and three months ended March 31,
2005.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 04-02
addresses the issue of whether mineral rights are tangible or
intangible assets. FASB Statement No. 141, Business
Combinations, requires the acquirer in a business combination to
allocate the cost of the acquisition to the acquired assets and
liabilities. At the March 17-18, 2004 meeting, the EITF reached
a consensus that mineral rights (defined as the legal right to
explore, extract and retain at least a portion of the benefits
from mineral deposits) are tangible assets. As a result of the
EITFs consensus, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(the FASB) issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) Nos. SFAS No. 141-a and
SFAS No. 142-a, Interaction of FASB Statements
No. 141, Business Combinations, and No. 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets, and EITF Issue No. 04-02,
Whether Mineral Rights Are Tangible or Intangible Assets, which
amend SFAS Nos. 141 and 142 and results in the
classification of mineral rights as tangible assets. We have
recorded mineral rights as tangible assets.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46), and subsequently revised FIN 46
in December 2003. As revised, FIN 46s consolidation
provisions apply to interest in variable interest entities
(VIEs) that are referred to as special-purpose
entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003. For
all other VIEs, FIN 46s consolidation provisions
apply for periods ending after March 15, 2004, or as of
March 31, 2004. We determined that FIN 46 did not
impact our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In January 2005, the FASB issued Statement 123R, Accounting
for Stock Based Compensation. FASB Statement 123R
supersedes APB Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. This statement establishes standards for accounting
transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments
for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which
an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services
that are based on the fair value of the entitys equity
instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those
equity instruments. FASB 123R is effective as of the beginning
of the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. We
believe adoption of FASB 123R will have no material impact on
our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
70
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Commodity price risk. We manage our commodity price risk
for coal sales through the use of long-term coal supply
agreements rather than through the use of derivative
instruments. As of May 31, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker
and CoalQuest acquisitions), we had sales commitments for 93% of
our planned 2005 production. Some of the products used in our
mining activities, such as diesel fuel, are subject to price
volatility. Through our suppliers, we utilize forward contracts
to manage the exposure related to this volatility. A
hypothetical increase of $0.10 per gallon for diesel fuel would
reduce pre-tax income for the three months ended March 31,
2005 by $0.6 million. A hypothetical increase of 10% in
steel prices would result in an increase in roof support costs.
This would reduce pre-tax income for three months ended
March 31, 2005 by $0.4 million.
Interest rate risk. Historically, we have had exposure to
changes in interest rates on a portion of our existing level of
indebtedness. This exposure had been hedged at 50% of the debt
for a two year period using pay-fixed, receive-variable interest
rate swaps. As a result of the transactions, we anticipate
exposure to changes in interest rates on a portion of our new
level of indebtedness. A hypothetical increase or decrease in
interest rates by 1% would have changed interest expense on our
credit facility by $437,500 for the three months ended
December 31, 2004. We expect to use interest rate swaps to
manage this risk.
Our concentration of credit risk is substantially with electric
utilities the majority of which are investment grade, producers
of steel and foreign customers. Our policy is to evaluate
independently each customers creditworthiness prior to
entering into transactions and to constantly monitor the credit
extended.
71
The coal industry
OVERVIEW
A major contributor to the world energy supply, coal represents
over 23% of the worlds primary energy consumption
according to the World Coal Institute. The primary use for coal
is to fuel electric power generation. In 2004, coal-fired plants
generated 50% of the electricity produced in the United States,
according to the EIA, a statistical agency of the
U.S. Department of Energy.
The United States produces over one-fifth of the worlds
coal and is the second largest coal producer in the world,
exceeded only by China. Other leading coal producers include
India, Australia and South Africa. The United States is the
largest holder of coal reserves in the world, with over
250 years supply at current production rates.
U.S. coal demand trends 1975-2003
Source: EIA
DEMAND FOR U.S. COAL PRODUCTION
Coal produced in the United States is used primarily by
utilities to generate electricity, by steel companies to produce
coke for use in blast furnaces and by a variety of industrial
users to heat and power foundries, cement plants, paper mills,
chemical plants and other manufacturing and processing
facilities. Significant quantities of coal are also exported
from both east and west coast terminals. According to the EIA,
99% of coal consumed in the United States in 2004 was from
domestic production sources. Coal produced in the United States
is also exported, primarily from east coast
72
The coal industry
terminals. The breakdown of 2004 U.S. coal consumption by
sector, according to the EIA, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End use |
|
Tons (millions) | |
|
% of total | |
| |
Electric Power
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
91.9 |
% |
Other Industrial Plants
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Coke Plants
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Residential & Commercial
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Total
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Source: EIA
Coal has long been favored as an electricity generating fuel by
regulated utilities because of its basic economic advantage. The
largest cost component in electricity generation is fuel.
According to the National Mining Association, coal is by far the
cheapest source of power fuel per million Btu, averaging less
than one-third the price of both petroleum and natural gas.
According to the EIA, for a new coal-fired plant built today,
fuel costs would represent about one-half of total operating
costs, whereas the share for a new natural-gas-fired plant would
be almost 90%. Coal used as fuel to generate electricity is
commonly referred to as steam coal.
Other factors that influence each utilitys choice of
electricity generation mode, include facility cost, fuel
transportation infrastructure, environmental restrictions and
other factors. The breakdown of U.S. electricity generation
by fuel source in 2004, as estimated by the EIA, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total | |
|
|
electricity | |
Electricity generation source |
|
generation | |
| |
Coal
|
|
|
50 |
% |
Nuclear
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Natural Gas
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Hydro
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Petroleum
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Source: EIA
The EIA projects that generators of electricity will increase
their demand for coal as demand for electricity increases.
Because coal-fired generation is used in most cases to meet base
load requirements, coal consumption has generally grown at the
pace of electricity demand growth. Demand for electricity has
historically grown in proportion to U.S. economic growth as
measured by gross domestic product. According to the EIA, coal
use for electricity generation is expected to increase on
average by 1.6% per year from 2003 to 2025.
73
The coal industry
U.S. electricity demand increasing 1970-2025
forecasted
Source: EIA
The other major market for coal is the steel industry. The type
of coal used in steel making is referred to as metallurgical
coal and is distinguished by special quality characteristics
that include high carbon content, low expansion pressure, low
sulfur content, and various other chemical attributes.
Metallurgical coal is also high in heat content (as measured in
Btus), and therefore is desirable to utilities as fuel for
electricity generation. Consequently, metallurgical coal
producers have the ongoing opportunity to select the market that
provides maximum revenue. The premium price offered by steel
makers for the metallurgical quality attributes is typically
higher than the price offered by utility coal buyers that value
only the heat content.
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION
In 2004, total coal production as estimated by the DOE was
1.1 billion tons. The primary producing regions were
Appalachia (35%), Interior (13%) and Western (52%). Most of our
coal production comes from the Central Appalachian region. In
2003, approximately 67% of U.S. coal was produced by
surface mining methods. The remaining 33% was produced by
underground mining methods that include room and pillar mining
and longwall mining.
U.S. coal production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998 | |
|
1999 | |
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(tons in millions | |
Area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian
|
|
|
460.4 |
|
|
|
425.6 |
|
|
|
419.4 |
|
|
|
431.2 |
|
|
|
396.2 |
|
|
|
376.0 |
|
|
|
390.7 |
|
Interior (includes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois Basin)
|
|
|
168.4 |
|
|
|
162.5 |
|
|
|
143.5 |
|
|
|
146.9 |
|
|
|
146.6 |
|
|
|
146.0 |
|
|
|
147.5 |
|
Western
|
|
|
488.8 |
|
|
|
512.3 |
|
|
|
510.7 |
|
|
|
547.9 |
|
|
|
550.4 |
|
|
|
548.7 |
|
|
|
573.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,117.6 |
|
|
|
1,100.4 |
|
|
|
1,073.6 |
|
|
|
1,126.0 |
|
|
|
1,093.2 |
|
|
|
1,070.7 |
|
|
|
1,111.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Coal Industry Annual Review and Coal Weekly,
1998-2004, EIA.
Central Appalachia
Central Appalachia, including eastern Kentucky, Virginia and
southern West Virginia, produced 21% of the total U.S. coal
production in 2004. Coal mined from this region generally has a
high heat content of between 12,000 and 14,000 Btus per pound
and a low sulfur content ranging from 0.7% to 1.5%. From 2000 to
2004 according to the EIA, the Central Appalachian region
experienced a decline in production from 258 million tons
to 230 million tons, or a 11% decline, primarily as a
result of the
74
The coal industry
depletion of economically attractive reserves, permitting issues
and increasing costs of production, which was partially offset
by production increases in Southern West Virginia due to the
expansion of more economically attractive surface mines.
The structural issues in Central Appalachia have led to
exceedingly high barriers to entry. These barriers are likely to
prevent large-scale development in the region in both the short
and medium term. In addition, alternative fuel sources have
limited benefits and eastern utilities are reluctant to invest
heavily to switch to PRB coal. Thus, the increasing demand
coupled with the supply constraints will likely result in price
stabilization at higher levels in Central Appalachia.
INDUSTRY TRENDS
In recent years, the coal industry has experienced several
significant trends including:
Significant gains in mining productivity. U.S. coal
production more than doubled from 1968 to 1998 due largely to
changes in work practices and the introduction of new
technologies that have greatly increased mine productivity.
According to the EIA, overall coal mine productivity, measured
in tons produced per miner shift, has increased from 30.6 tons
in 1990 to 55.6 tons in 2003.
Growth in coal consumption. According to EIA, from 1990
to 2004 coal consumption in the United States increased from
895 million tons to 1,104 million tons, or 23%. The
largest driver of increased coal consumption during this period
was increased demand for electricity. The EIA estimates that
coal use for electricity generation is expected to increase on
average by 1.6% per year from 2003 to 2025.
Increased utilization of existing capacity of coal-fired
power plants. We believe that existing coal-fired plants
will supply much of the projected increase in the demand for
electricity because they possess excess capacity that can be
utilized at low incremental costs. The NETL has identified 106
coal-fired plants, representing 65,000 megawatts of electric
generation capacity, that have been proposed and are currently
in various stages of development.
Restructuring of electricity industry
In October 1992, Congress enacted the Energy Policy Act of 1992,
which gave wholesale electricity suppliers access to the
transmission lines of U.S. utility companies. In May 1996,
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued the first of a
series of orders establishing rules to promote competition in
wholesale electricity markets by providing wholesale electricity
suppliers open access to electricity transmission systems. In
1999, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued a rule to
encourage the establishment of regional transmission
organizations. Wholesale competition has resulted in a
substantial increase in non-utility generating capacity in the
United States.
Increasingly stringent air quality laws
The coal industry has witnessed a recent shift in demand to low
sulfur coal production driven by regulatory restrictions on
sulfur dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants. In 1995,
Phase I of the Clean Air Act Acid Rain program required
high sulfur coal plants to reduce their emissions of sulfur
dioxide to 2.5 pounds or less per million Btu, and in 2000,
Phase II of the Clean Air Act tightened these sulfur
dioxide restrictions further to 1.2 pounds of sulfur dioxide per
million Btu. Currently, electric power generators operating
coal-fired plants can comply with these requirements by:
|
|
4 |
burning lower sulfur coal, either exclusively or mixed with
higher sulfur coal; |
|
4 |
installing pollution control devices such as scrubbers, which
reduce the emissions from high sulfur coal; |
|
4 |
reducing electricity generating levels; or |
|
4 |
purchasing or trading emission credits to allow them to comply
with the sulfur dioxide emission compliance requirements. |
75
The coal industry
However, as new and proposed laws and regulations, including the
Clean Air Interstate Rule and the Clean Air Mercury Rule require
further reductions in emissions, coal-fired utilities may need
to install additional pollution control equipment, such as wet
scrubbers, to comply. Installation of such additional pollution
control equipment required could potentially result in a
decrease in the demand for low sulfur coal (because sulfur would
be removed by the new equipment), potentially driving down
prices for low sulfur coal.
RECENT COAL MARKET CONDITIONS
According to traded coal indices and reference prices, U.S. and
international coal demand is currently at high levels, and coal
pricing has increased year-over-year in nearly every significant
U.S. and international market. We believe that current
fundamentals in the U.S. coal industry are among the
strongest witnessed over the past decade, supported primarily by:
|
|
4 |
stronger industrial demand following a recovery in the
U.S. manufacturing sector; |
|
4 |
relatively low customer stockpiles; |
|
4 |
production difficulties and reserve degradation experienced by
some U.S. coal producers; |
|
4 |
capacity constraints of U.S. nuclear-powered electricity
generators; |
|
4 |
high current and forward prices for natural gas and oil; |
|
4 |
transportation disruptions including constrained rail line
capacity and increased costs faced by the trucking
industry; and |
|
4 |
increased international demand for U.S. coal for
electricity generation and steelmaking, driven by global
economic growth, high ocean freight rates and the weak
U.S. dollar. |
Coal prices are influenced by a number of factors and often vary
dramatically by region. The following charts illustrate coal
spot prices and annual production for Central Appalachia and the
Illinois Basin.
Central Appalachian pricing environment
Source: EIA, Bloomberg L.P.
76
The coal industry
Illinois Basin Pricing Environment
Source: EIA, Bloomberg L.P.
77
Business
OVERVIEW
We are a leading producer of coal in Northern and Central
Appalachia with a broad range of mid to high Btu, low sulfur
steam and metallurgical coal. Our Appalachian mining complexes,
which include 11 of our mining complexes, are located in West
Virginia, Kentucky and Maryland. We also have a complementary
mining complex of mid to high sulfur steam coal strategically
located in the Illinois Basin. We market our coal to a diverse
customer base of largely investment grade electric utilities, as
well as domestic and international industrial customers. The
high quality of our coal and the availability of multiple
transportation options, including rail, truck and barge,
throughout the Appalachian region enable us to participate in
both the domestic and international coal markets. Due to the
decline in Appalachian coal production in recent years, these
markets are currently characterized by strong demand with
limited supply response and elevated spot and contract prices.
The company was formed by WLR and other investors in May 2004 to
acquire and operate competitive coal mining facilities. As of
September 30, 2004, ICG, Inc. acquired certain key assets
of Horizon through a bankruptcy auction. These assets are high
quality reserves strategically located in Appalachia and the
Illinois Basin, are union free, have limited reclamation
liabilities and are substantially free of other legacy
liabilities. Due to our initial capitalization, we were able to
complete the acquisition without incurring a significant level
of indebtedness. Consistent with the WLR investor groups
strategy to consolidate profitable coal assets, the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions further diversify our reserves. On or
about the same time as the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions, we
will complete a corporate reorganization. With the proceeds of
this offering, we expect to retire substantially all of our
debt, including debt assumed through the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions, and, thus, we will be strategically
well-positioned.
As of January 1, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions), we owned or controlled approximately
315 million tons of metallurgical quality coal reserves and
approximately 572 million tons of steam coal reserves.
Based on expected 2005 production rates, our Northern and
Central Appalachian reserves (pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions) could support existing production levels
for approximately 35 years and all of our reserves could
support existing production levels for approximately
49 years. Further, we own or control approximately
707 million tons of coal resources, pro forma for the Anker
and CoalQuest acquisitions.
Steam coal is primarily consumed by large electric utilities and
industrial customers as fuel for electricity generation. Demand
for low sulfur steam coal has grown significantly since the
introduction of certain controls associated with the Clean Air
Act and the decline in coal production in the eastern half of
the United States. Metallurgical coal is primarily used to
produce coke, a key raw material used in the steel making
process. Generally, metallurgical coal sells at a premium to
steam coal because of its higher quality and its importance and
value in the steel making process. During 2004 and the first
quarter of 2005, the demand for metallurgical coal increased
substantially as the global demand for steel increased.
For the year ended December 31, 2004 (pro forma for the
Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions), we sold 18.4 million
tons of coal, of which 18.2 million tons were steam coal
and 0.2 million tons were metallurgical coal. Our steam
coal sales volume in 2004 consisted of mid to high quality, high
Btu (greater than 12,000 Btu/lb.), low sulfur (1.5% or
less) coal, which typically sells at a premium to lower quality,
lower Btu, higher sulfur steam coal, pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions. Our three largest customers for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 were Georgia Power
Company, Carolina Power & Light Company and Duke Power
and we derived approximately 49% of our coal revenues from sales
to our five largest customers, pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions.
78
Business
OUR HISTORY
The Horizon acquisition
On February 28, 2002, Horizon (at that time operating as
AEI Resources Holdings, Inc.) filed a voluntary petition for
Chapter 11 and its plan of reorganization became effective
on May 8, 2002. However, Horizons profit margins and
cash flows were negatively impacted in fiscal year 2002 by,
among other things, the falling price of coal and continued
increases in certain operating expenses. Due to capital and
permit constraints, Horizon had to mine in areas which produced
coal but at greatly reduced profit margins thus severely
reducing cash flow.
As a result of its continuing financial and operational
difficulties, Horizon filed a second voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 on November 13, 2002. Horizon
obtained a debtor-in-possession financing facility of up to
$350.0 million and was effective in rationalizing its
operations, selling non-core assets, paying down outstanding
borrowings and generating substantial operating profit. With
stabilized operations and a significantly improved coal market,
Horizon filed a joint plan of reorganization and a joint plan of
liquidation under Chapter 11.
ICG was formed by WL Ross & Co. LLC and other
investors in May 2004. The Horizon assets were sold to us
through a bankruptcy auction on August 17, 2004. Presented
as a combined $290.0 million cash bid with A.T. Massey,
ICG, Inc. agreed to pay $285.0 million in cash plus the
assumption of up to $5.0 million in cure costs to acquire
the assets plus ICG, Inc. also contributed a credit bid of
second lien Horizon bonds, and A.T. Massey agreed to pay
$5.0 million in cash to acquire a separate group of assets
associated with two Horizon subsidiaries. The credit bid
included the cancellation of $482.0 million of certain
Horizon bonds in return for which those Horizon bondholders
received the right to participate in a rights offering to
purchase ICG common stock. Shares issued in connection with the
rights offering are included in our outstanding stock. The
former bondholders of Horizon that purchased shares of ICG, Inc.
common stock in the rights offering were creditors of Horizon
and received the shares in reliance on Section 1145 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code, which in general provides for the limited
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act for securities issued in exchange for a claim against the
debtor in bankruptcy. Since ICGs formation, some trading
of ICG, Inc.s common stock has occurred. See Price
range of ICG, Inc. common stock. ICG has not previously
been a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
In addition, Lexington Coal Company, LLC, a newly formed entity,
was organized by the founding ICG, Inc. stockholders to assume
certain reclamation liabilities and assets not otherwise being
purchased by A.T. Massey or ICG, Inc. In order to provide
support to Lexington Coal in consideration for assuming these
liabilities, we agreed to provide a $10.0 million letter of
credit to support reclamation obligations and to pay a 0.75%
royalty on the gross sales receipts for coal mined and sold from
the assets we acquired from Horizon until the completion by
Lexington Coal of all reclamation liabilities acquired from
Horizon. Other than this support and a limited commonality of
ownership of ICG and Lexington Coal Company, there is no
relationship between the entities.
The bankruptcy court confirmed the sale on September 16,
2004 as part of the completion of the Horizon bankruptcy
proceedings. At closing, we increased the purchase price by
$6.25 million, primarily to satisfy increased
administrative expenses, and the sale was completed as of
September 30, 2004.
The acquisition was financed through equity investments and
borrowings under our senior secured credit facility, which we
entered into at the closing of the Horizon acquisition. See
Description of indebtedness for a discussion of our
senior credit facility. We expect to repay a portion of the term
loan facility with the proceeds of this offering.
79
Business
The Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions
On March 31, 2005, ICG, Inc. entered into a business
combination agreement with Anker Coal Group, Inc., ICG (then
known as ICG Holdco, Inc.), at that time a wholly owned
subsidiary of ICG, Inc., ICG Merger Sub, Inc., an indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of ICG, and Anker Merger Sub, Inc., an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of ICG. Under the terms of the
business combination agreement, simultaneously with the
effective time of the mergers under the CoalQuest business
combination agreement, ICG Merger Sub will merge with and into
ICG, Inc. and Anker Merger Sub will merge with and into Anker,
with each of ICG, Inc. and, Anker surviving their respective
mergers as indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of ICG and ICG
will be the new parent holding company. The agreement was
amended May 10, 2005 to allow the exchange ratio formula to be
adjusted if ICG engages in a stock split.
The stockholders of Anker, collectively, are entitled to receive
the lesser of (i) 19,498,581 shares of ICG common
stock and (ii) the number of shares of ICG common stock
equal to the quotient of 173,250,000 divided by the price per
share at which our stock is offered in this offering (the
base merger share number), subject to the following
possible adjustments. If certain events relating to the
commencement of specified coal production and the execution of a
coal purchase contract do not occur prior to the effectiveness
of the merger, ICG will only issue shares equal to the lesser of
(i) 18,373,122 shares of ICG common stock and
(ii) the number of shares of ICG common stock equal to the
quotient of 163,250,000 divided by the price per share at which
our common stock is offered in this offering (the adjusted
merger share number) at the effective time of the merger
and will reserve but not issue the number of shares equal to the
difference between the adjusted merger share number and base
merger share number (this difference, the contingent
shares). These contingent shares are only issuable to the
former stockholders of Anker if one of the following events
occurs: (i) the commencement of the production of coal at
Ankers Stoney River mine or (ii) the execution of a
contract for the purchase of coal from the Gladys Fork
mine; provided in either case that such event, at the time it
occurs, could reasonably be expected (alone or with the other
event) to generate at least $6.0 million of EBITDA during
calendar years of 2005 and 2006.
On March 31, 2005, ICG, Inc. also entered into a business
combination agreement with CoalQuest, ICG and CoalQuest Merger
Sub LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of ICG, and the
members of CoalQuest. Under the terms of the business
combination agreement, simultaneously with the effective time of
the mergers under the Anker business combination agreement, the
members of CoalQuest will contribute their interests in
CoalQuest to us in exchange for shares of our common stock. As a
result of this contribution, CoalQuest will become our wholly
owned subsidiary. The agreement was amended May 10, 2005 to
allow the exchange ratio formula to be adjusted if ICG engages
in a stock split.
The members of CoalQuest, collectively, will receive the lesser
of (i) 11,451,548 shares of ICG common stock and
(ii) the number of shares of common stock equal to the
quotient of 101,750,000 divided by the price per share at which
our common stock is offered in this offering.
The former stockholders of Anker and former members of CoalQuest
will be granted certain piggyback registration rights with
respect to the ICG common stock issued to them. For additional
information on registration rights, see Description of
capital stockRegistration rights.
The completion of both transactions is subject to various
conditions, all of which have been fulfilled other than the
approval by the ICG, Inc. stockholders of the corporate
reorganization. In addition, the completion of the transactions
under each business combination agreement is conditioned upon
the satisfaction of the conditions precedent of the transactions
under the other business combination agreement.
80
Business
Our reorganization
On or about the same time as the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions, we will complete a corporate reorganization. Prior
to the reorganization, our current top-tier parent holding
company is ICG, Inc. Upon completion of the reorganization, ICG
will become the new top-tier parent holding company. In the
corporate reorganization, the stockholders of ICG, Inc. are
expected to receive one share of ICG common stock for each
share of ICG, Inc. common stock. The shares of our common stock
being issued to the ICG, Inc. stockholders are expected to be
registered pursuant to a separate registration statement to be
filed with the SEC. All stockholders of ICG, Inc., all Anker
stockholders and all CoalQuest members will be stockholders of
ICG after the reorganization and the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions.
OUR COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS
We believe that the following competitive strengths enhance our
prominent market position in the United States:
Ability to provide variety of high-quality steam and
metallurgical coal. Our customers, which include largely
investment grade electric utilities, as well as domestic and
international industrial customers, demand a variety of coal
products. Our variety of coal qualities also allows us to blend
coal in order to meet the exact specifications of our customers.
Our access to a comprehensive range of high Btu steam and
metallurgical quality coal allows us to market differentiated
coal products to a variety of customers with different coal
quality demands, which allows us to benefit from particularly
strong pricing dynamics in the current metallurgical coal market.
Concentration in highly valued Central Appalachian
region. Our operations are primarily located in Central
Appalachia, a region known for its high quality coal
characterized by low sulfur and high Btu content. Production
from Central Appalachian mines accounted for approximately 73.2%
of our 2004 coal sales volume, pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions. Increased electricity generation and
steel production both domestically and internationally has lead
to a substantial increase in demand and a significantly improved
pricing environment. In addition to general market factors
creating a favorable environment, the Central Appalachian region
has experienced production declines in five out of the last six
years, primarily due to difficult mining conditions, yet demand
continues to increase. We believe that generally favorable
market dynamics and trends in Central Appalachian coal supply
and demand, the high quality of Central Appalachian coal and the
low transportation costs that result from the relative proximity
of Central Appalachian producers and customers have created
favorable pricing dynamics that provide us with an advantage
over producers from other regions.
Significant reserve base providing internal expansion
opportunities. We own approximately 613 million
tons of reserves and control an additional 274 million tons
of reserves through long-term leases, pro forma for the Anker
and CoalQuest acquisitions. We own or control an additional
707 million tons of coal resources, pro forma for the Anker
and CoalQuest acquisitions. We have not yet developed
approximately 73% of these owned and controlled reserves. We
believe these owned and controlled but as yet undeveloped
reserves and resources would allow us to as much as double our
existing production levels over the next several years. Our
ownership and control of such a substantial portion of
undeveloped reserves in both Northern and Central Appalachia and
the Illinois Basin provides us with significant internal growth
opportunities, this is in contrast to other U.S. coal
producers who must acquire or lease new reserves to enable their
growth. We also have coalbed methane reserves in our owned
reserves in West Virginia, which provides us with additional
growth opportunities in this complementary energy market.
Ability to capitalize on strong coal market
dynamics. A significant portion of our coal supply
contracts were renegotiated during the second half of 2004 in
connection with Horizons bankruptcy
81
Business
and were re-priced at that time to then-current (and more
favorable) market prices and terms. On average, our coal supply
contracts have a life of approximately five years, however, the
majority of our contracts contain annual price reopeners. Our
marketing effort is focused on maintaining a balance of
longer-term contracts and spot sales. We typically have 50% of
our production contracted by the early part of the previous year
with another 35% contracted by the second half of the year with
the remainder of our production used to take advantage of market
dynamics and maximize value in the spot market.
Diversity of reserves, resources and production.
Our reserves, resources and production are located in three of
the four major coal regions in the United States. Our
production, reserves and resources in Northern and Central
Appalachia and the Illinois Basin provide important geographical
diversity in terms of markets, transportation and labor. The
diversity of our operations and reserves provides us with a
significant competitive advantage, allowing us to source coal
from multiple operations to meet the needs of our customers and
reduce transportation costs.
Minimal level of long-term liabilities. We believe
that compared to other publicly-traded U.S. coal producers
we have among the lowest legacy reclamation liabilities and
post-retirement employee obligations. As of March 31, 2005
(pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions), we had
total accrued reclamation liabilities of only
$68.9 million, post-retirement employee obligations of only
$8.4 million, black lung liabilities of
approximately $10.6 million and Coal Act liabilities of
only $4.7 million. We maintain a comprehensive mine
reclamation plan which we believe ensures that all of our mining
operations are current on reclamation requirements. In addition,
our entire workforce is union free, which minimizes
employee-related liabilities commonly associated with
union-represented mines. As of March 31, 2005 (pro forma
for the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions), our total debt was
$216.7 million and after this offering we expect to retire
all of this debt, excluding $7.1 million of capitalized
leases and other debt obligations. We believe that our financial
leverage is among the lowest of the publicly traded
U.S. coal producers. We believe this low leverage will
afford significant financial and operational flexibility.
Highly skilled management team. The members of our
senior management team have, on average, 23 years of
industry work experience across a variety of mining methods,
including longwall mining. We have substantial Appalachian
mining experience in increasing productivity, reducing costs,
enhancing work safety practices, and maintaining strong customer
relationships. In addition, the majority of our senior
management team has extensive mine development and expansion
experience.
Recognized leadership in safety and environmental
stewardship. The injury incident rates at our mines
throughout 2004, according to MSHA, were below industry
averages. We have been recognized by safety and environmental
agencies with several prestigious awards for our safety and
environmental record, such as the Sentinels of Safety
Award from MSHA, The Department of Interior
Excellence in Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation
Award and a reclamation award for innovative methods from
the West Virginia Coal Association. Our focus on safety and
environmental performance results in the reduced likelihood of
disruption of production at our mines, which leads to higher
productivity and improved financial performance.
OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY
Our objective is to increase stockholder value through sustained
earnings and cash flow growth. Our key strategies to achieve
this objective are described below:
Maximize profitability through highly efficient and
productive mining operations. We are continuing to
evaluate and assess our current operations in order to maximize
operating efficiency and returns on invested capital. We are
focused on maintaining low-cost, highly productive operations by
continuing to invest substantial capital in state-of-the-art
equipment and advanced technologies. We expect to
82
Business
internally fund approximately $304 million of capital
expenditures in the next two years. As we take advantage of
planned expansion opportunities from 2007 through 2009
principally as a result of the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions,
we expect to spend approximately $627 million on capital
expenditures, which may require external financing. We have
developed and cultivated a productivity-focused culture through
incentive programs that encourage employees to work efficiently,
safely and productively. We intend to further leverage the scale
of our purchasing power to obtain favorable pricing from
suppliers of raw materials in addition to developing reserves
and utilizing mining techniques, such as longwall mining and
dragline operation, to enhance and streamline our operations.
Leverage owned and controlled reserve base to generate
substantial internal growth. We own a large undeveloped
reserve in Northern Appalachia containing approximately
194 million tons of high Btu, low sulfur steam and
metallurgical quality coal, pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions. We currently expect underground longwall
mining operations at this reserve to commence within the next
four years, which will increase our production level by
providing highly valued premium quality coal in an increasingly
tight supply market. In addition, we have two substantial
reserves in Central Appalachia (pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions), which contain 56.5 million tons of
premium metallurgical coal and are expected to be developed in
the next three to six years. Further, the substantial reserve
position that we own in the Illinois Basin is expected to allow
us to benefit from the expected increase in demand for high
sulfur coal to generate electricity. We are in the process of
developing and exploiting our coalbed methane reserves (the
first such development and exploration in the region). Finally,
we intend to opportunistically acquire new coal reserves and/or
coal companies to expand our coal market opportunities and
increase shareholder value.
Capitalize on favorable industry fundamentals by
opportunistically marketing coal. U.S. coal market
fundamentals are among the strongest in the last 20 years.
We believe this generally favorable pricing environment will
persist given systemic changes in market dynamics such as
long-term supply constraints and increasing demand, particularly
in Central Appalachia and for our metallurgical coal.
Furthermore, because of the high quality of our coal, our access
to a variety of alternative transportation methods, including
truck, rail and barge, and our mix of long-term contract and
spot market sales, we will be able to capitalize on the
favorable industry dynamics to maximize our revenues and
profits. We plan to extend the life of our longer-term contract
arrangements and limit price reopeners in order to lock in
margins and enhance our financial stability, while at the same
time, we plan to maintain an uncommitted portion of planned
production to allow for additional future pricing upside
exposure. As of May 31, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions), we had entered into contracts to sell
approximately 93% of 2005 planned production, approximately 69%
of 2006 planned production and approximately 48% of 2007 planned
production.
Continue to focus on improving workplace safety and
environmental compliance. We have maintained and plan to
continue to maintain an excellent safety and environmental
performance record. We continue to implement safety measures and
environmental initiatives that are designed to promote safe
operating practices and improved environmental stewardship among
our employees. Our ability to maintain a good safety and
environmental record improves our productivity and lowers our
overall cost structure as well as bolsters employee morale.
COAL MINING METHODS
We produce coal using two mining methods: underground room and
pillar mining using continuous and longwall mining equipment,
and surface mining, which are explained as follows:
Underground mining
Underground mines in the United States are typically operated
using one of two different techniques: room and pillar mining or
longwall mining. In 2004, approximately 36% of our produced and
83
Business
processed coal volume came from underground mining operations
generally using the room and pillar method with continuous
mining equipment.
Room and pillar mining
In room and pillar mining, rooms are cut into the coalbed
leaving a series of pillars, or columns of coal, to help support
the mine roof and control the flow of air. Continuous mining
equipment is used to cut the coal from the mining face.
Generally, openings are driven 20 feet wide and the pillars
are generally rectangular in shape measuring 35-50 feet
wide by 35-80 feet long. As mining advances, a grid-like
pattern of entries and pillars is formed. Shuttle cars are used
to transport coal to the conveyor belt for transport to the
surface. When mining advances to the end of a panel, retreat
mining may begin. In retreat mining, as much coal as is feasible
is mined from the pillars that were created in advancing the
panel, allowing the roof to cave. When retreat mining is
completed to the mouth of the panel, the mined panel is
abandoned. The room and pillar method is often used to mine
smaller coal blocks or thinner seams. It is also employed
whenever subsidence is prohibited. Seam recovery ranges from 35%
to 70%, with higher seam recovery rates applicable where retreat
mining is combined with room and pillar mining. Productivity for
continuous room and pillar mining in the United States
averages 3.3 tons per employee per hour, according to the
EIA.
Longwall mining
The other underground mining method commonly used in the United
States is the longwall mining method. ICG does not currently
have any longwall mining operations, but expects to use this
mining method in the development for two of its undeveloped
mining properties in West Virginia. In longwall mining, a
rotating drum is trammed mechanically across the face of coal
and a hydraulic system supports the roof of the mine while it
advances through the coal. Chain conveyors then move the
loosened coal to an underground mine conveyor system for
delivery to the surface.
Surface mining
Surface mining is used when coal is found close to the surface.
In 2004, approximately 64% of our produced and processed coal
volume came from surface mines. This method involves the removal
of overburden (earth and rock covering the coal) with heavy
earth moving equipment and explosives, loading out the coal,
replacing the overburden and topsoil after the coal has been
excavated and reestablishing vegetation and plant life and
making other improvements that have local community and
environmental benefit. Overburden is typically removed at our
mines using large, rubber-tired diesel loaders. Seam recovery
for surface mining is typically between 80% and 90%.
Productivity depends on equipment, geological composition and
mining ratios and averages 4.2 tons per employee per hour
in eastern regions of the United States, according to the EIA.
We use the following four types of surface mining methods.
Truck-and-shovel/loader mining
Truck-and-shovel/loader mining is a surface mining method that
uses large shovels or loaders to remove overburden which is used
to backfill pits after coal removal. Shovels or loaders load
coal into haul trucks for transportation to a preparation plant
or unit train loadout facility. Seam recovery using the
truck-and-shovel/ loader mining method is typically 85% or more.
Dragline mining
Dragline mining is a surface mining method that uses large
capacity draglines to remove overburden to expose the coal
seams. Shovels load coal in haul trucks for transportation to a
preparation plant or unit train loadout facility. Seam recovery
using the dragline method is typically 85% or more and
productivity levels are similar to those for
truck-and-shovel/loader mining.
84
Business
Highwall mining
Highwall mining is a surface mining method generally utilized in
conjunction with truck-and-shovel/ loader surface mining. At the
highwall exposed by the truck-and-shovel/ loader operation a
modified continuous miner with an attached beltline system cuts
horizontal passages from the highwall into a seam. These
passages can penetrate to a depth of up to 1,600 feet. This
method typically can recover up to 65% of the reserve block
penetrated.
Auger mining
Auger mining is a surface mining method generally utilized in
conjunction with truck-and-shovel/ loader operations. At the
highwall exposed by a truck-and-shovel/ loader operation, a
spiral steel auger bit is used to bore a horizontal hole into
the coal seam up to a depth of 400 feet. The auger also
conveys the coal to the highwall. Seam recovery using auger
mining is typically 33%.
Coal preparation and blending
Depending on coal quality and customer requirements, raw coal
may in some cases be shipped directly from the mine to the
customer. Generally, raw coal from mountaintop removal, contour
and strip mines can be shipped in this manner. However, the
quality of most underground raw coal does not allow it to be
shipped directly to the customer without processing in a
preparation plant. Preparation plants separate impurities from
coal. This processing upgrades the quality and heating value of
the coal by removing or reducing sulfur and ash-producing
materials, but entails additional expense and results in some
loss of coal. Coals of various sulfur and ash contents can be
mixed or blended at a preparation plant or loading
facility to meet the specific combustion and environmental needs
of customers. Coal blending helps increase profitability by
reducing the cost of meeting the quality requirements of
specific customer contracts, thereby optimizing contract revenue.
COAL CHARACTERISTICS
In general, coal of all geological composition is characterized
by end use as either steam coal or metallurgical coal. Heat
value and sulfur content are the most important variables in the
profitable marketing and transportation of steam coal, while
ash, sulfur and various coking characteristics are important
variables in the profitable marketing and transportation of
metallurgical coal. We mine, process, market and transport
bituminous and sub-bituminous coal, characteristics of which are
described below.
Heat value
The heat value of coal is commonly measured in Btus per pound of
coal. A Btu is the amount of heat needed to raise one pound of
water one degree Fahrenheit. Coal found in the Eastern and
Midwestern regions of the United States tends to have a heat
content ranging from 10,000 to 14,000 Btus per pound, as
received. As received Btus per pound includes the weight of
moisture in the coal on an as sold basis. Most coal found in the
Western United States ranges from 8,000 to 10,000 Btus per
pound, as received.
Lignite coal
Lignite coal is a brownish-black coal with a heat content that
generally ranges from 4,000 to 8,000 Btus per pound. Major
lignite operations are located in Louisiana, Montana, North
Dakota and Texas. Lignite is used almost exclusively in power
plants located adjacent to or near these mines because any
significant transportation costs, coupled with mining costs,
would render its use uneconomical.
85
Business
Sub-bituminous coal
Sub-bituminous coal is a black coal with a heat content that
ranges from 8,300 to 11,500 Btus per pound. Most
sub-bituminous reserves are located in Alaska, Colorado,
Montana, New Mexico, Washington and Wyoming. Sub-bituminous coal
is used almost exclusively by electricity generators and some
industrial consumers.
Bituminous coal
Bituminous coal is a relatively soft black coal with a heat
content that ranges from 10,000 to 14,000 Btus per pound.
This coal is located primarily in Appalachia, Arizona, Colorado,
the Midwest and Utah, and is the type most commonly used for
electricity generation in the United States. Bituminous coal is
also used for industrial steam purposes by utility and
industrial customers, and as metallurgical coal in steel
production. Coal used in metallurgical processes has higher
expansion/contraction characteristics than steam coal.
Anthracite coal
Anthracite coal is a hard coal with a heat content that can
range from 14,000 to 15,000 Btus per pound. There is a
limited number of anthracite deposits primarily located in the
Appalachian region of Pennsylvania. Anthracite is used primarily
for utility, industrial and home heating purposes.
Sulfur content
Sulfur content can vary from seam to seam and sometimes within
each seam. When coal is burned, it produces sulfur dioxide, the
amount of which varies depending on the chemical composition and
the concentration of sulfur in the coal. Compliance coal is coal
which, when burned, emits 1.2 pounds or less of sulfur
dioxide per million Btus and complies with the requirements of
the Clean Air Act Acid Rain program. Low sulfur coal is coal
which, when burned, emits approximately 1.6 pounds or less
of sulfur dioxide per million Btus.
Sub-bituminous coal typically has a lower sulfur content than
bituminous coal, but some of our bituminous coal in West
Virginia also has a low sulfur content.
High sulfur coal can be burned in electric utility plants
equipped with sulfur-reduction technology, such as scrubbers,
which can reduce sulfur dioxide emissions by up to 90%. Plants
without scrubbers can burn high sulfur coal by blending it with
lower sulfur coal, or by purchasing emission allowances on the
open market, which credits allow the user to emit a ton of
sulfur dioxide. Each emission allowance permits the user to emit
a ton of sulfur dioxide. By 2000, 90,000 megawatts of electric
generation capacity utilized scrubbing technologies. According
to the EIA, by 2025, an additional 27,000 megawatts of electric
generation capacity will have installed scrubbers. Additional
scrubbing will provide new market opportunities for our mid
sulfur coal. All new coal-fired electric utility generation
plants built in the United States will use clean coal-burning
technology.
Other characteristics
Ash is the inorganic residue remaining after the combustion of
coal. As with sulfur content, ash content varies from coal seam
to coal seam. Ash content is an important characteristic of coal
because it increases transportation costs and electric
generating plants must handle and dispose of ash following
combustion.
Moisture content of coal varies by the type of coal, the region
where it is mined and the location of coal within a seam. In
general, high moisture content decreases the heat value per
pound of coal, thereby increasing the delivered cost per Btu.
Moisture content in coal, as sold, can range from approximately
5% to 30% of the coals weight.
86
Business
COAL RESERVES
Reserves are defined by SEC Industry Guide 7 as that
part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and
legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve
determination. Proven (Measured) Reserves are
defined by SEC Industry Guide 7 as reserves for which
(1) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in
outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or
quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and
(2) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are
spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined
that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are
well-established. Probable reserves are defined by
SEC Industry Guide 7 as reserves for which quantity and grade
and/or quality are computed from information similar to that
used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for
inspection, sampling, and measurement are farther apart or are
otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance,
although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is
high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.
We estimate that there are approximately 242 million tons
of coal reserves (pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions) that can be developed by our existing operations
which will allow us to maintain current production levels for an
extended period of time. ICG Natural Resources, LLC and
CoalQuest own and lease all of our reserves that are not
currently assigned to or associated with one of our mining
operations. These reserves contain approximately
645 million tons of mid to high Btu, low and high sulfur
coal located in Kentucky, West Virginia, Maryland, Illinois,
Pennsylvania and Virginia. Our multi-region base and flexible
product line allows us to adjust to changing market conditions
and sustain high sales volume by supplying a wide range of
customers.
87
Business
Our total coal reserves could support current production levels
for more than 49 years. The following table provides the
quality (average Btu content, sulfur content and ash
content per pound) of our coal reserves as of January 1,
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality characteristics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as received) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reserves proven | |
|
Total tons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and probable | |
|
(in millions |
|
|
|
|
|
Tons by market | |
|
|
|
|
as of 1/1/2005 | |
|
of tons) |
|
Reserve | |
|
Heat | |
|
|
|
classification | |
|
|
|
|
(in millions | |
|
|
|
life | |
|
content | |
|
Sulfur | |
|
Ash |
|
| |
Mining companies |
|
State |
|
of tons)(1) | |
|
Owned |
|
Leased |
|
(years) | |
|
(Btu/lb) | |
|
(%) | |
|
(%) |
|
Steam | |
|
Metallurgical(4)(5) | |
| |
Northern Appalachia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vindex Energy Corporation
|
|
MD |
|
|
10.64 |
|
|
0.00 |
|
10.64 |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
11,500- 13,000 |
|
|
1.2%- 2.0% |
|
|
7.0%- 19.0% |
|
|
7.98 |
|
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
Patriot Mining Company
|
|
WV, PA |
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
0.71 |
|
0.34 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
11,700 |
|
|
|
2.1% |
|
|
16.2% |
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Spruce Fork Division
|
|
WV |
|
|
48.57 |
|
|
46.70 |
|
1.88 |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
1.2% |
|
|
9.0% |
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
47.27 |
|
|
Philippi Development Division
|
|
WV |
|
|
40.97 |
|
|
32.34 |
|
8.63 |
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
13,100 |
|
|
|
1.4% |
|
|
8.3% |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
40.97 |
|
|
Harrison Division
|
|
WV |
|
|
17.51 |
|
|
0.23 |
|
17.28 |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
3.2% |
|
|
12.5% |
|
|
17.51 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Mount Storm Division
|
|
WV, MD |
|
|
6.01 |
|
|
0.47 |
|
5.54 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
9.0% |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
|
|
Sycamore Group, LLC
|
|
WV |
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
0.17 |
|
1.04 |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
3.2% |
|
|
12.0% |
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
CoalQuest Development LLC
|
|
WV |
|
|
194.30 |
|
|
194.30 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
1.3% |
|
|
9.8% |
|
|
32.70 |
|
|
|
161.60 |
|
|
Northern Appalachia Total
|
|
|
|
|
320.27 |
|
|
274.92 |
|
45.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.75 |
|
|
|
258.52 |
|
Central Appalachia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG - Knott Country
|
|
KY |
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
5.81 |
|
0.92 |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
12,700 |
|
|
|
1.3% |
|
|
8.4% |
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
ICG - Hazard
|
|
KY |
|
|
71.38 |
|
|
0.23 |
|
71.15 |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
1.6% |
|
|
11.2% |
|
|
71.38 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
ICG - East Kentucky
|
|
KY |
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
0.00 |
|
2.62 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
|
1.2% |
|
|
12.2% |
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
ICG - Eastern
|
|
WV |
|
|
23.69 |
|
|
7.27 |
|
16.42 |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
|
1.1% |
|
|
12.2% |
|
|
23.69 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
ICG - Natural
Resources(2)
|
|
WV |
|
|
44.90 |
|
|
2.20 |
|
42.70 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
0.8% |
|
|
12.2% |
|
|
44.90 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
ICG - Natural
Resources(3)
|
|
KY |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
1.5 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
1.1% |
|
|
12.0% |
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Beckley-Smokeless
Division(4)
|
|
WV |
|
|
28.97 |
|
|
1.28 |
|
27.70 |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
13,800 |
|
|
|
0.7% |
|
|
4.8% |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
28.97 |
|
|
Anker Virginia Mining Company
|
|
VA |
|
|
27.50 |
|
|
0.00 |
|
27.50 |
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.6% |
|
|
4.0% |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
27.50 |
|
|
Central Appalachia Total
|
|
|
|
|
211.69 |
|
|
21.19 |
|
190.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153.72 |
|
|
|
56.47 |
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG - Illinois
|
|
IL |
|
|
29.63 |
|
|
11.38 |
|
18.25 |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
3.2% |
|
|
9.5% |
|
|
29.63 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
ICG - Natural Resources
|
|
|
|
|
325.21 |
|
|
305.10 |
|
20.1 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
9.0% |
|
|
326.71 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Other Total
|
|
|
|
|
354.84 |
|
|
316.48 |
|
38.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356.34 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Total Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
886.81 |
|
|
612.51 |
|
274.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571.81 |
|
|
|
314.99 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Recoverable reserves represent the amount of coal reserves
that can actually be recovered taking into account all mining
and preparation losses involved in producing a saleable product
using existing methods under current law. The reserve numbers
set forth in this table exclude reserves for which we have
leased our mining rights to third parties. Reserve information
reflects a moisture factor of approximately 6.0%. This moisture
factor represents the average moisture present on our delivered
coal. |
|
(2) |
ICG - Natural Resources (Jennys Creek) |
|
(3) |
ICG - Natural Resources (Mount Sterling) |
|
(4) |
Beckley Smokeless and Anker Virginia meet historical
metallurgical coal quality specifications. |
|
(5) |
Currently, ICG reports selling coal with ash and sulfur
contents as high as 10% and 1.5%, respectively into the current
metallurgical market from the Vindex Energy, Spruce Fork, and
Phillipi Divisions. Similarly, all production Mount Storm and
portions of Hillman could be sold on this metallurgical market
when production begins. |
Our reserve estimate is based on geological data assembled and
analyzed by our staff of geologists and engineers. Reserve
estimates are periodically updated to reflect past coal
production, new drilling information and other geologic or
mining data. Acquisitions or sales of coal properties will also
change the reserve base. Changes in mining methods may increase
or decrease the recovery basis for a coal seam as will plant
processing efficiency tests. We maintain reserve information in
secure computerized databases, as well as in hard copy. The
ability to update and/or modify the reserve base is restricted
to a few individuals and the modifications are documented.
88
Business
Actual reserves may vary substantially from the estimates.
Estimated minimum recoverable reserves are comprised of coal
that is considered to be merchantable and economically
recoverable by using mining practices and techniques prevalent
in the coal industry at the time of the reserve study, based
upon then-current prevailing market prices for coal. We use the
mining method that we believe will be most profitable with
respect to particular reserves. We believe the volume of our
current reserves exceeds the volume of our contractual delivery
requirements. Although the reserves shown in the table above
include a variety of qualities of coal, we presently blend coal
of different qualities to meet contract specifications. See
Risk factorsRisks relating to our business.
Periodically, we retain outside experts to independently verify
our coal reserve base. The most recent review was completed
during the first quarter of 2005 and covered all of our
reserves. The results verified our reserve estimates, with very
minor adjustments, and included an in-depth review of our
procedures and controls. As of January 1, 2005 (pro forma
for the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions), Marshall
Miller & Associates, Inc. confirmed our reserve base of
887 million tons on a consolidated basis.
We currently own approximately 69% of our coal reserves, with
the remainder of our coal reserves subject to leases from
third-party landowners. Generally, these leases convey mining
rights to the coal producer in exchange for a percentage of
gross sales in the form of a royalty payment to the lessor,
subject to minimum payments. Leases generally last for the
economic life of the reserves. The average royalties paid by us
for coal reserves from our producing properties was $1.48 per
ton in 2004, representing approximately 4.2% of our coal sales
revenue in 2004, pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions. Consistent with industry practice, we conduct only
limited investigations of title to our coal properties prior to
leasing. Title to lands and reserves of the lessors or grantors
and the boundaries of our leased priorities are not completely
verified until we prepare to mine those reserves.
89
Business
Coal Resources
Coal resources are coal-bearing bodies that have been
sufficiently sampled and analyzed in trenches, outcrops,
drilling, and underground workings to assume continuity between
sample points, and therefore warrants further exploration stage
work. However, this coal does not qualify as a commercially
viable coal reserve as prescribed by SEC standards until a final
comprehensive evaluation based on unit cost per ton,
recoverability, and other material factors concludes legal and
economic feasibility. Resources may be classified as such by
either limited property control or geologic limitations, or both.
The following table provides the quality (average
Btu content, sulfur content and ash content per pound) of our
coal resources as of January 1, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality characteristics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as received) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable |
|
|
|
|
|
Tons by market |
|
|
|
|
resources |
|
Resource |
|
Heat |
|
|
|
classification |
|
|
|
|
as of 1/1/2005 |
|
life |
|
content |
|
Sulfur |
|
Ash |
|
|
Mining company |
|
State |
|
(in millions of tons)(1) |
|
(years) |
|
(Btu/lb) |
|
(%) |
|
(%) |
|
Steam |
|
Metallurgical(4) |
|
Northern Appalachia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patriot Mining Company
|
|
WV, PA |
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Spruce Fork Division
|
|
WV |
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Philippi Development Division
|
|
WV |
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
13,100 |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Harrison Division
|
|
WV |
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
CoalQuest Development LLC
|
|
WV |
|
|
37.04 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.04 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Upshur Property
|
|
WV |
|
|
92.96 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
43.0 |
% |
|
|
92.96 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Northern Appalachia Total
|
|
|
|
|
137.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.99 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Central Appalachia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG Knott County
|
|
KY |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,700 |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
ICG Hazard
|
|
KY |
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
ICG East Kentucky
|
|
KY |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
ICG Eastern
|
|
WV |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
ICG Natural
Resources(2)
|
|
WV |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
ICG Natural
Resources(3)
|
|
KY |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Beckley Smokeless
Division(4)
|
|
WV |
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
13,800 |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
Anker Virginia Mining Company
|
|
VA |
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Central Appalachia Total
|
|
|
|
|
7.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.82 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICG Illinois
|
|
IL |
|
|
38.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
38.47 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
ICG Natural Resources
|
|
|
|
|
522.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
522.52 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
Other Total
|
|
|
|
|
560.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560.99 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Total Resources
|
|
|
|
|
706.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
704.80 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Currently, ICG reports selling coal with ash and sulfur
contents as high as 10% and 1.5%, respectively into the current
metallurgical market from the Vindex Energy, Spruce Fork, and
Philippi Divisions. Similarly, all of Mount Storm and portions
of Hillman can be sold on this metallurgical market. |
|
(2) |
ICG Natural Resources (Jennys Creek) |
|
(3) |
ICG Natural Resources (Mount Sterling) |
|
(4) |
Beckley Smokeless and Anker Virginia meet historical
metallurgical coal quality specifications. |
90
Business
OPERATIONS
As of December 31, 2004, we operated a total of 13 surface
and 10 underground coal mines located in Kentucky, Maryland,
West Virginia and Illinois. Historically, approximately 64% of
our production has come from surface mines, and the remaining
production has come from our underground mines. These mining
facilities include eight preparations plants, each of which
receive, blend, process and ship coal that is produced from one
or more of our 23 active mines. Our underground mines generally
consist of one or more single or dual continuous miner sections
which are made up of the continuous miner, shuttle cars, roof
bolters and various ancillary equipment. Our surface mines are a
combination of mountain top removal, dragline, highwall contour
and cross ridge operations using truck/loader equipment fleets
along with large production tractors. Most of our preparation
plants are modern heavy media plants that generally have both
coarse and fine coal cleaning circuits. We currently own most of
the equipment utilized in our mining operations. We employ
preventive maintenance and rebuild programs to ensure that our
equipment is modern and well maintained. The mobile equipment
utilized at our mining operation is scheduled to be replaced on
an on-going basis with new, more efficient units during the next
five years. Each year we endeavor to replace the oldest units,
thereby maintaining productivity while minimizing capital
expenditures. The following table provides summary information
regarding our principal mining complexes as of December 31,
2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type of mines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons | |
|
|
|
|
Preparation | |
|
Under- | |
|
|
|
Mining | |
|
|
|
produced | |
Mining complex |
|
Location |
|
plant(s) | |
|
ground | |
|
Surface | |
|
Total | |
|
method(a) | |
|
Transportation | |
|
in 2004 | |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
ICG Eastern, LLC
|
|
Cowen, WV |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
MTR-DL-TSL |
|
|
Rail |
|
|
2,712.1 |
|
ICG Hazard, LLC
|
|
Hazard, KY |
|
|
1 |
(1) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
R&P-CM, HW |
|
|
Rail |
|
|
3,978.0 |
|
ICG Knott County, LLC
|
|
Kite, KY |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
MTR-TSL CM |
|
|
Rail |
|
|
1,386.6 |
|
ICG East Kentucky, LLC
|
|
Pike Co., KY |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
MTR-TSL |
|
|
Rail |
|
|
1,576.3 |
|
ICG Illinois, LLC
|
|
Williamsville, IL |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
R&P-CM |
|
|
Truck |
|
|
2,117.6 |
|
Vindex Energy Corporation
|
|
Garrett Co., MD |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
CRM & CTR |
|
|
Truck, Rail
(2) |
|
|
170.7 |
|
Patriot Mining Company
|
|
Monongalia Co., WV |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
CTR |
|
|
Barge, Rail |
|
|
921.3 |
(3) |
Spruce Fork Division
|
|
Upshur Co., WV |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
R&P |
|
|
Rail |
|
|
1,213.9 |
|
Philippi Development Division
|
|
Barbour Co., WV |
|
|
1 |
(4) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
R&P |
|
|
Rail |
|
|
255.4 |
|
Beckley-Smokeless Division
|
|
Raleigh Co., WV |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
R&P |
|
|
Rail |
|
|
0.0 |
(2) |
Sycamore Group
|
|
Harrison Co., WV |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
R&P |
|
|
Truck |
|
|
259.3 |
(5)(6) |
CoalQuest Development LLC
|
|
Taylor Co., WV |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
R&P & LW |
|
|
Rail |
|
|
0.0 |
(7) |
Juliana Complex
|
|
Webster Co., WV |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
R&P & CTR |
|
|
Rail |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
CRM = Cross Ridge Mining; CTR = Contour Mining;
R&P = Room and Pillar; LW = Longwall; MTR =
Mountain Top Removal; DL = Dragline; HW = Highwall;
CM = Continuous Miner; TSL = Truck and Shovel/
Loader |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Expected to begin operation in second half of 2005 |
|
|
(2) |
Utilizing third-party loadout |
|
|
(3) |
Including waste-fuel |
|
|
(4) |
Currently utilizing one circuit |
|
|
(5) |
Mine permitted but undeveloped |
|
|
(6) |
Represents Ankers 50% share in The Sycamore Group LLC
joint venture plus the Sycamore No. 2 mine, expected to
begin production in 2005 |
|
|
(7) |
Undeveloped, permit in progress |
The following provides a description of the operating
characteristics of the principal mines and reserves of each of
our mining operations.
91
Business
MINING OPERATIONS
Northern and Central Appalachia mining operations
Our Northern and Central Appalachian mining facilities are
strategically located across West Virginia, Kentucky, Maryland,
Pennsylvania and Virginia and are used to produce and ship coal
to its customers located primarily in the eastern half of the
United States. We believe that the quality and experience of our
workforce in Northern and Central Appalachia are among the
highest in the coal mining industry. All of our Northern and
Central Appalachia mining operations are union free.
Our mines in Central Appalachia produced 9.7 million tons
of coal in 2004 and our mines in Northern Appalachia produced
2.8 million tons of coal in 2004, pro forma for the
Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions. The coal produced in 2004 was,
on average, 12,207 Btu/lb, 1.2% sulfur and 12.4% ash by content.
This year we estimate that our mines in Central Appalachia
region will produce approximately 10.5 million tons,
pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions. This
year we estimate that our mines in the Northern Appalachian
region will produce approximately 4.5 million tons,
pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions. This
high Btu, low sulfur coal is very marketable to major utility
customers throughout the eastern United States. Shipments to
electric utilities, accounted for approximately 78% of the coal
shipped by these mines in 2004, compared to 80% of shipments in
2003. Within each mining complex, mines have been developed at
strategic locations in proximity to our preparation plants and
rail shipping facilities. The mines located in Central
Appalachia ship the majority of their coal by the Norfolk
Southern and CSX rail lines, although production may also be
delivered by truck or barge, depending on the customer. ICG
Natural Resources, LLC owns two idle river docks along the
Kanawha River from which we could ship coal to our customers.
As of March 31, 2005, these mines had 1,481 employees.
ICG Eastern, LLC
ICG Eastern, LLC operates the Birch River surface mine, located
60 miles east of Charleston, near Cowen in Webster County,
West Virginia. Birch River started operations in 1990 under
Shell Mining Company, was purchased by Zeigler Coal Holding
Company, or Zeigler, in 1992, and was subsequently
acquired by AEI Resources, Inc. from Zeigler in 1998.
Birch River is extracting coal from five distinct coalbeds:
(i) Freeport; (ii) Upper Kittanning; (iii) Middle
Kittanning; (iv) Upper Clarion and (v) Lower Clarion.
Coal mined from this operation has an average sulfur content of
1.1%, an average ash content of 12.2% and an average Btu content
of 12,300. We estimate that Birch River controls
23.7 million tons of coal reserves.
Approximately 69% of the coal reserves are leased, while
approximately 31% are owned in fee. Most of the leased reserves
are held by four lessors. The leases are retained by annual
minimum payments and by tonnage-based royalty payments. All
leases can be renewed until all mineable and merchantable coal
has been exhausted.
Overburden is removed by a dragline, shovel, front-end loaders,
end dumps and bulldozers. Approximately one-third of the coal
can be marketed run-of-mine, while the other two-thirds is
washed at Birch Rivers preparation plant. Coal is
transported by conveyor belt from the preparation plant to Birch
Rivers rail loadout, which is served by CSX. The loadout
is a batch weigh system capable of loading unit trains in less
than four hours.
The preparation plant is rated at 800 raw tons per hour. The
preparation plant is comprised of heavy media vessels, heavy
media cyclones, and spirals. The plant, overland conveyor
system, and rail loadout are in excellent condition.
92
Business
ICG Hazard, LLC
ICG Hazard, LLC is currently operating six surface mines, a unit
train loadout (Kentucky River Loading) and other support
facilities in eastern Kentucky, near Hazard. The coal reserves
and operations were acquired in late-1997 and 1998 by AEI
Resources.
ICG Hazards six surface mines include: (i) County
Line; (ii) Flint Ridge; (iii) Vicco; (iv) Rowdy
Gap; (v) Tip Top; and (vi) Thunder Ridge. The coal
from these mines is being extracted from the Hazard 11,
Hazard 10, Hazard 9, Hazard 8, Hazard 7 and
Hazard 5A seams, and has an average sulfur content of 1.2%,
an average ash content of 12% and an average Btu content of
12,000. Nearly all of the coal is marketed run-of-mine. We
estimate that ICG Hazard controls 71.4 million tons of
coal reserves, plus 3.0 million tons of coal that is
classified as resources. Most of the property has been
adequately explored, but additional core drilling will be
conducted within specified locations to better define the
reserve base.
Approximately 99.7% of ICG Hazards reserves are
leased, while 0.3% are owned in fee. Most of the leased reserves
are held by seven lessors. In several cases, ICG Hazard has
multiple leases with each lessor. The leases are retained by
annual minimum payments and by tonnage-based royalty payments.
Most leases can be renewed until all mineable and merchantable
coal has been exhausted.
Overburden is removed by front-end loaders, end dumps,
bulldozers and blast casting. Coal is transported from the mines
to the Kentucky River Loading rail loadout by on-highway trucks.
The loadout is served by CSX, and is a batch weigh system
capable of loading 120-car trains in less than three hours. Most
of the coal is transported by rail, but some coal is direct
shipped to the customer by truck from the mine pits.
An existing preparation plant structure is being extensively
upgraded. It will process coal from ICG Hazards new
Flint Ridge underground mine complex. Flint Ridge will be a room
and pillar mine, producing coal from the Hazard 8 coalbed.
It will utilize continuous miners and shuttle cars. Both the
plant and the underground mine are scheduled to begin operation
in July 2005.
ICG Knott County, LLC
ICG Knott County, LLC operates four underground mines, the
Supreme Energy preparation plant and rail loadout, and other
facilities necessary to support the mining operations in eastern
Kentucky, near Kite. ICG Knott County was acquired by
AEI Resources, Inc. from Zeigler in 1998.
ICG Knott County is producing coal from the Hazard 4 and
the Elkhorn 3 coalbeds. Three mines are operating in the
Hazard 4 coalbed: Calvary, Clean Energy and Elk Hollow. The
Classic mine is operating in the Elkhorn 3 coalbed. The
coal produced from the four mines has an average sulfur content
of 1.3%, an average ash content of 9%, and an average Btu
content of 12,700. We estimate these properties contain
6.7 million tons of coal reserves. Most of the property has
been extensively explored, but additional core drilling will be
conducted within specified locations to better define the
reserve base.
Approximately 86% of ICG Knott Countys reserves are
owned in fee, while approximately 14% are leased. The leases are
retained by annual minimum payments and by tonnage-based royalty
payments. The leases can be renewed until all mineable and
merchantable coal has been exhausted.
ICG Knott Countys four underground mines are room and
pillar operations, utilizing continuous miners and shuttle cars.
Nearly all of the run-of-mine coal is processed at the Supreme
Energy preparation plant; some of the Hazard 4 run-of-mine
coal is blended with the washed coal.
Nearly all of ICG Knott Countys coal is transported
by rail. The loadout is a batch weigh system that is served by
CSX.
93
Business
ICG East Kentucky, LLC
ICG East Kentucky, LLC is a surface mining operation located in
Pike County, Kentucky, near Phelps. ICG East Kentucky
currently operates the Blackberry surface mine and the Phelps
Loadout. ICG East Kentucky was acquired by
AEI Resources in the second quarter of 1999.
Blackberry is an area surface mine that produces coal from three
separate coalbeds: (i) Taylor; (ii) Fireclay; and
(iii) Lower Fireclay. All of the coal is sold run-of-mine,
with an average sulfur content of 1.2%, an average ash content
of 12% and an average Btu content of 12,400.
We estimate that the Blackberry mine controls 2.6 million
tons of coal reserves; no additional exploration is required.
After Blackberry is depleted, ICG East Kentucky will begin
mining the Mount Sterling property, which contains an additional
5.9 million tons of coal reserves. Mount Sterling is
located in Martin and Pike Counties, Kentucky near the Tug Fork
River. Although Mount Sterling is expected to be mined by
ICG East Kentucky, the property is held by ICG Natural
Resources, LLC. The leases are retained by annual minimum
payments and by tonnage-based royalty payments. The leases can
be renewed until all mineable and merchantable coal has been
exhausted.
Overburden at the Blackberry mine is removed by front end
loaders, end dumps, bull dozers and blast casting. Coal from the
pits is transported by truck to the Phelps Loadout, which is a
batch weigh system.
Vindex Energy Corporation
Vindex Energy Corporation operates two surface mines, the Island
mine and the Douglas mine, in the Potomac Basin in Garrett
County, Maryland. The reserves at Vindex are leased primarily
from one major landowner. The lease expires in 2010 and is
renewable on a year-by-year basis with a minimum annual holding
cost. Vindex Energy is a cross-ridge mining operation extracting
coal from the Upper Freeport, Middle Kittanning and Upper
Kittanning seams. Both mines are truck-and-shovel/loader mining
operations utilizing dozers, hydraulic excavators, loaders and
trucks. Operations are conducted with relatively new equipment
and exploration and development is conducted on a continual
basis ahead of mining.
Vindex has been operating its mines at full production since the
first quarter 2005, and it is projected that the mines will
produce a combined 654,000 tons in 2005. Approximately 20%
of the raw coal production is screened at the Island Mine for
sales directly to the customers. Such an arrangement increases
our margins by reducing transportation costs to and from
preparation plants, resulting in cost savings. The remainder of
the coal is processed at our 200 TPH heavy media
preparation plant located near Mount Storm, West Virginia, where
the product is shipped to the customer by either truck or rail
using a third-party rail loading facility.
Four new surface mines are under development in the Potomac
Basin in Garrett County, Maryland. Anker anticipates mining to
commence at one of these operations in 2007, an additional two
in 2008 and the last mine producing by 2009. Like the Island and
Douglas mines, these four mines will utilize
truck-and-shovel/loaders and will be extracting coal from the
Bakerstown, Upper Freeport, Mahoning, Upper Kittanning and
Middle Kittanning seams. These future reserves are currently
being explored and permitted for mining.
Patriot Mining Company
Patriot Mining Company consists of three active surface mines
near Morgantown, West Virginia: Crown No. 2 and New Hill
East located in Monongalia County, West Virginia and Keener
located in
94
Business
Green County, Pennsylvania. The majority of the coal and surface
is leased under renewable contracts with small annual minimum
holding costs. Patriots mines are extracting coal from the
Waynesburg seam using contour mining methods with dozers,
loaders and trucks. As mining progresses, reserves are being
acquired and permitted for future operations. The mining
equipment is maintained in good condition.
We have projected that Patriots three mines will produce
approximately 750,000 tons in 2005. Patriot is planning six
new mines on property currently being acquired, explored and
permitted that will begin phasing into production starting next
year through 2009. These mines will also extract coal from the
Waynesburg seam using contour mining methods with dozers,
loaders and trucks.
Spruce Fork Division Anker West Virginia Mining
Company
The Spruce Fork Division currently consists of two active
underground mines; Spruce No. 1 and Sago located in Upshur
County, West Virginia, near the town of Buckhannon. The Spruce
No. 1 Mine is extracting coal from the Upper Freeport seam
and the Sago mine is extracting coal from the Middle Kittanning
seam. Nearly all of the reserves in the Spruce Fork Division are
owned by ICG. The Spruce No. 1 Mine opened in 1997 and we
anticipate that its reserves will be depleted sometime during
the third quarter of 2005. The Sago mine, which was originally
opened in 1999 as a contract mine, closed in 2002, and then
reopened as a captive operation in the first quarter of 2004.
Sago is expected to reach full production by the fourth quarter
of 2005.
Both operations utilize the room-and-pillar mining method with
continuous miners and shuttle cars for coal removal from the
face. The Sago mine was re-opened using brand new mining
equipment and infrastructure from the original portal location.
All of the coal extracted from these mines is processed at a
rate of nearly 750 TPH through the nearby Sawmill Run heavy
media preparation plant where coal is then primarily shipped by
CSX rail, although some coal is trucked to local industrial
customers.
We have projected that the Spruce Fork Division will produce
approximately 1.3 million tons of coal in 2005. The
Sago 3 mine, scheduled for production in 2007, is a
replacement for the Spruce No. 1 Mine. The reserves at
Spruce Fork have characteristics that make it marketable to both
steam and metallurgical coal customers.
Sycamore Group
Sycamore Group consists of The Sycamore Group LLC and the
Harrison Division. The Sycamore Group LLC is a joint venture
between ICG and Emily Gibson Coal Company. The joint venture
operates one underground mine, the Sycamore No. 1 Mine
(a.k.a. the Fairfax No. 3 Mine), in Harrison County,
West Virginia, approximately ten miles west of Clarksburg, where
coal is extracted from the Pittsburgh seam by room-and-pillar
mining methods with continuous miners and shuttle cars for coal
extraction.
The majority of the coal is leased with an annual minimum
holding cost. It is anticipated that this reserve will be
depleted and the mine closed during the second quarter of 2006.
Operations are conducted utilizing the room and pillar mining
method. Newly rebuilt mining equipment was recently installed to
facilitate the complete extraction of the remaining reserves. We
expect that ICGs 50% share of the 2005 production to be
approximately 210,000 tons, all of which is sold on a raw
basis and shipped to Allegheny Power Service Corporations
Harrison Power Station by truck.
The Harrison Division consists of the Sycamore No. 2
Mine, which is located in Harrison County, West Virginia,
approximately ten miles west of Clarksburg The
Sycamore No. 2 Mine is expected to begin producing
coal from the Pittsburgh seam using room-and-pillar mining
methods with continuous miners and shuttle cars in the second
quarter of 2005. The reserve is primarily leased from one major
95
Business
landowner with an annual minimum holding cost and an automatic
renewal based on an annual minimum production of
250,000 tons. The coal is being accessed with a box-cut and
will be mined utilizing room and pillar mining methods with new
mining equipment.
The planned annual production is expected to increase from
approximately 430,000 tons in 2005 to over 1.6 million
tons in 2006. The coal produced from the Sycamore No. 2
mine will be sold on a raw basis and shipped to Allegheny Power
Service Corporations Harrison Power Station by truck under
a new life of mine, total production coal supply agreement.
Philippi Development Division Anker West Virginia
Mining Company
The Philippi Development Division operates the Sentinel mine, in
Barbour County, West Virginia near the town of Philippi. The
mine was acquired by Anker in 1990 and has been operating ever
since. Historically, coal was extracted from the Lower
Kittanning seam; however, mining is currently conducted in the
Upper Kittanning seam by room-and-pillar mining method with a
new low-seam continuous haulage mining system which was
installed in the fourth quarter of 2004. The current operations
are expected to be supplemented with a second continuous haulage
mining system in the first quarter of 2007.
Coal is fed directly from the mine to a 600 TPH heavy media
preparation plant and loadout facility served by the CSX
railroad. The product can be shipped on steam or metallurgical
markets. The Sentinel Mine is projected to produce approximately
317,000 tons in 2005. Production is expected to increase to
634,000 tons by 2008 with the addition of the second continuous
haulage mining system.
New Appalachian mine developments
Hillman property
The Hillman property, located in Northern Appalachia, includes
194 million tons of deep coal reserves of both steam and
metallurgical quality coal in the Lower Kittanning seam covering
approximately 65,000-acres located predominantly in Taylor
County, West Virginia, near Grafton. The reserve extends into
parts of Barbour, Marion, and N. Harrison Counties as well. ICG
owns the Hillman coal reserve in addition to nearly
4,000 acres of surface property to accommodate the
development of three projected mining operations. In addition to
the Lower Kittanning reserves, we also own significant coal
resources in the Kittanning, Freeport, Clarion and Mercer seams
on the Hillman property.
The Hillman reserves are currently being permitted for the
development of three mining operations; two longwall and one
room and pillar. Production from the first complex is projected
to begin in 2007 with a full annual production of 9 million
tons expected from the three mines by 2010.
Upshur property
The Upshur Property, located in Northern Appalachia, is a
88 million tons of resource owned or controlled by us in
the Middle and Lower Kittanning seams. The resource is surface
mineable at a ratio of slightly greater than 2 to 1.
Both Kittanning seams will be mined as a 7,500 Btu fuel by
extracting all of the coal splits and associated partings. The
low product heat content limits the distance over which the fuel
can be transported and sold; however, the low mining cost makes
Upshur an attractive location for an on-site power plant. Some
preliminary research, including air quality monitoring, has been
completed in association with the future construction of a
circulating fluidized bed power plant at Upshur.
96
Business
Big Creek property
Our Big Creek reserve, located in Central Appalachia, covers
10,000 acres of leased coal lands located north of the town of
Richlands in Tazewell County, Virginia. Total recoverable
reserves are 27.5 million tons in the Jawbone, Greasy Creek
and War Creek seams. The largest coal block is a deep reserve in
the War Creek seam, which is a high-quality metallurgical coal
ranging from low to mid vol. The Big Creek reserve is all leased
from Southern Regional Industrial Reality. Production from the
permitted War Creek Mine is expected to begin in 2007 utilizing
the room and pillar mining method with continuous haulage. The
mine is expected to reach full production of nearly
1 million tons per year by 2008. The coalbed methane at Big
Creek is currently leased to and being produced by Pocahontas
Gas Partnership with an overriding royalty paid to us.
Bay Hill property
The Bay Hill reserve, located in Central Appalachia, is a
29 million-ton deep reserve of high quality low-vol
metallurgical coal in the Pocahontas No. 3 seam in Raleigh
County west of Beckley, West Virginia. The southwest portion of
the reserve underlies part of the recently closed BayBeck Mine
in the Beckley seam. Most of the 16,800 acre Bay Hill reserve is
leased from three land companies: Western Pocahontas Properties,
Crab Orchard Coal Company and Beaver Coal Company. We have
permitted a portion of the Bay Hill reserve for deep mine
development.
Juliana Complex
Mining on the Juliana property, located in Central Appalachia,
in Webster County, WV, began in 1979 and was stopped in
December 1999. Contour and mountain top removal stripping
methods were utilized to produce coal from the Kittanning and
Upper Freeport seams. In addition, a substantial amount of
deep-mined coal was produced from the Middle Kittanning seam. A
500 TPH preparation facility with 100,000 tons of raw and
clean coal storage and a unit-train loadout was used to process
and load coal on the CSX railroad.
Currently at Juliana, there are two Kittanning deep mine permits
and one surface mine permit in place. Permitted deep and surface
coal resources are 1.2 million tons and 1.9 million
tons, respectively. The ratio for the surface reserve is 17.3 to
1 bulk cubic yard per clean ton. The projected clean coal
quality for deep and surface-mined coal combined is
7.5 ash, 0.82% sulfur and 13,100 Btu, on an as
received basis.
Illinois Basin mining operations
ICG Illinois, LLC operates one large underground coal mine, the
Viper mine, in central Illinois. Viper commenced mining
operations in 1982 as a union free operation for Shell Oil
Company. Viper was acquired by Ziegler in 1992 and subsequently
acquired by Horizon in 1998.
The Viper Mine is working the Illinois No. 5 Seam, also
referred to as the Springfield Seam, with all raw coal
production washed at Vipers preparation plant. Coal mined
from this operation has an average sulfur content of 3.2%, an
average ash content of 9.5% and an average Btu content of
10,500. We estimate that Viper controls approximately
29.6 million tons of coal reserves, plus an additional
38.5 million resource tons. Viper has an ongoing
exploration program to accurately assess floor and roof
conditions within the immediate mine plan.
Approximately two-thirds of the coal reserves are leased, while
one-third is owned in fee. The leases are retained by annual
minimum payments and by tonnage-based royalty payments. The
leases can be renewed until all mineable and merchantable coal
has been exhausted.
97
Business
The Viper mine is a room and pillar operation, utilizing
continuous miners and shuttle cars. ICG Illinois is one of
the lowest cost and highest productivity mines in the Illinois
Basin. All of the raw coal is processed at Vipers
preparation plant. The clean coal is transported to the
customers by on highway trucks. A major rail line is located a
short distance from the plant, giving Viper the option of
constructing a rail loadout.
ICG Illinois ships by independent trucking companies to utility
and industrial customers located in North Central Illinois.
Shipments to electric utilities account for approximately 71% of
coal sales. Currently 1.7 million tons (80%) of
ICG Illinois 2005 production is under contract. The
City of Springfield Water, Light and Power purchases nearly 50%
of Vipers production and the contract does not expire
until 2020.
The preparation plant is rated at 800 raw tons per hour. It
is comprised of heavy media vessels, heavy media cyclones, and
spirals.
The underground equipment, infrastructure, and preparation plant
are well maintained. The underground equipment will be replaced
or rebuilt over the next five years.
OTHER OPERATIONS
Coal sales
In addition to the coal we mine, from time to time we also
opportunistically secure coal purchase agreements with other
coal producers to take advantage of differences in market prices.
ICG ADDCAR Systems, LLC
In our highwall mining business, we operate or lease six systems
using our patented ADDCAR highwall mining system and intend to
build additional ADDCAR systems as required. The ADDCAR highwall
mining system is an innovative and efficient mining system. The
system is often deployed at reserves that cannot be economically
mined by other methods.
In a typical ADDCAR highwall mining system, there is a launch
vehicle, continuous miner, conveyor cars, a stacker conveyor,
electric generator, water tanker for cooling and dust
suppression and a wheel loader with forklift attachment.
A five person crew operates the entire ADDCAR highwall mining
system with control of the continuous miner being performed
remotely by one person from the climate-controlled cab located
at the rear of the launch vehicle. Our system utilizes a
navigational package to provide horizontal guidance, which helps
to control rib width and thus roof stability. Also, the system
provides vertical guidance for control out of seam dilutions.
The ADDCAR highwall mining system is also equipped with high
quality video monitors to provide the operator with visual
displays of the mining process from inside each entry being
mined.
The mining cycle begins by aligning the ADDCAR highwall mining
system onto the desired heading and starting the entry. As the
remotely controlled continuous miner penetrates the coal seam,
ADDCAR conveyor cars are added behind it, forming a continuous
cascading conveyor train. This continues until the entry is at
the planned full depths of up to 1,200 to 1,500 feet. After
retraction, the launch vehicle is moved to the next entry,
leaving a support pillar of coal between entries. This process
recovers as much as 65% of the reserves while keeping all
personnel outside the coal seam in a safe working environment. A
wide range of seam heights can be mined with high production in
seams as low as 3.5 feet and as high as 15 feet in a
single pass. If the seam height is greater than 15 feet,
then multi lifts can be mined to create an unlimited entry
height. The navigational features on the
98
Business
ADDCAR highwall mining system allow for multi lift mining while
ensuring that the designed pillar width is maintained.
During the mining cycle, in addition to the tractive effort
provided by the crawler drive of the continuous miner the ADDCAR
highwall mining system bolsters the cutting capability of the
machine through an additional pumping force provided by
hydraulic cylinders which transmit thrust to the back of the
miner through blocks mounted on the side of the conveyor cars.
This additional energy allows the continuous miner to achieve
maximum cutting and loading rates as it moves forward into the
seam.
We currently have the exclusive North American distribution
rights for the ADDCAR highwall mining system.
Coalbed methane
Through a planned joint operating agreement still under
negotiation, CoalQuest will exploit and develop coalbed methane
which is pipeline quality gas that resides in coal seams. In the
eastern United States, conventional natural gas fields are
typically located in various sedimentary formations at depths
ranging from 2,000 to 15,000 feet. We believe this is the
first such development and exploration in the region.
Exploration companies often put their capital at risk by
searching for gas in commercially exploitable quantities at
these depths. By contrast, gas in coal seams that we anticipate
drilling is typically in formations less than 2,500 feet
deep which are usually better defined than deeper formations. We
believe that this contributes to lower exploration costs than
those incurred by producers that operate in deeper, less defined
formations. We have not filed reserve estimates with any federal
agency.
CUSTOMERS AND COAL CONTRACTS
Customers
Our primary customers are investment grade electric utility
companies primarily in the eastern half of the United States.
The majority of our customers purchase coal for terms of one
year or longer, but we also supply coal on a spot basis for some
of our customers. Our three largest customers for the three
months ended March 31, 2005, pro forma for the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions, were Georgia Power Company, Carolina
Power & Light Company and Duke Power and we derived
approximately 49% of our coal revenues from sales to our five
largest customers, pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions.
Long-term coal supply agreements
As is customary in the coal industry, we enter into long-term
supply contracts (exceeding one year in duration) with many of
our customers when market conditions are appropriate. These
contracts allow customers to secure a supply for their future
needs and provides us with greater predictability of sales
volume and sales price. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005 (pro forma for the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions), approximately 70% of our revenues were derived
from long-term supply contracts. We sell the remainder of our
coal through short-term contracts and on the spot market. We
have also entered into certain brokered transactions to purchase
certain amounts of coal to meet our sales commitments. The
purchase coal contracts expire between 2006 and 2010 and provide
us a minimum of approximately 10.7 million tons of coal
through the remaining lives of the contracts.
As a result of the Horizon bankruptcy process, we were able to
renegotiate certain contracts at significantly higher prices
that reflected the current pricing environment and not purchase
unfavorable contracts. However, we do have certain contracts
which are set below current market rates because
99
Business
Anker entered into these contracts before the recent rise in the
coal prices. As the net costs associated with producing coal
have risen, such as higher energy, transportation and steel
prices, the price adjustments within several of our long-term
contracts have not caught up to the new coal prices. This has
resulted in certain counterparties to these contracts benefiting
from below market prices for our coal.
The terms of our coal supply agreements result from competitive
bidding and extensive negotiations with customers. Consequently,
the terms of these contracts vary significantly by customer,
including price adjustment features, price reopener terms, coal
quality requirements, quantity parameters, permitted sources of
supply, future regulatory changes, extension options, force
majeure provisions and termination and assignment provisions.
Some of our long-term contracts provide for a pre-determined
adjustment to the stipulated base price at times specified in
the agreement or at other periodic intervals to account for
changes due to inflation or deflation. In addition, most of our
contracts contain provisions to adjust the base price due to new
statutes, ordinances or regulations that impact our costs
related to performance of the agreement. Also, some of our
contracts contain provisions that allow for the recovery of
costs impacted by modifications or changes in the
interpretations or application of any applicable government
statutes.
Price reopener provisions are present in most of our long-term
contracts. These price reopener provisions may automatically set
a new price based on prevailing market price or, in some
instances, require the parties to agree on a new price,
sometimes between a specified range of prices. In a limited
number of agreements, failure of the parties to agree on a price
under a price reopener provision can lead to termination of the
contract. Under some of our contracts, we have the right to
match lower prices offered to our customers by other suppliers.
These price reopener provisions have enabled us to negotiate
higher selling prices in several contracts over the last several
months.
Quality and volumes for the coal are stipulated in coal supply
agreements, and in some instances buyers have the option to vary
annual or monthly volumes. Most of our coal supply agreements
contain provisions requiring us to deliver coal within certain
ranges for specific coal characteristics such as heat content,
sulfur, ash, hardness and ash fusion temperature. Failure to
meet these specifications can result in economic penalties,
suspension or cancellation of shipments or termination of the
contracts. Assuming steady or increasing coal prices over the
near-term, we expect to renew many of our expiring sales
contracts at significantly higher prices.
Transportation/logistics
We ship coal to our customers by rail, truck or barge. We
typically pay the transportation costs for our coal to be
delivered to the barge or rail loadout facility, where the coal
is then loaded for final delivery. Once the coal is loaded in
the barge or railcar, our customer is typically responsible for
the freight costs to the ultimate destination. Transportation
costs vary greatly based on the customers proximity to the
mine and our proximity to the loadout facilities. We use a
variety of independent companies for our transportation needs
and typically enter into multiple non-contract agreements with
trucking companies throughout the year.
In 2004, approximately 85% of our coal from our Central
Appalachian operations was delivered to our customers by rail on
either the Norfolk Southern or CSX rail lines, with the
remaining 15% delivered by truck. For our Illinois Basin
operations, 100% of our coal was delivered by truck to
customers, generally within an 80 mile radius of our
Illinois mine.
We believe we enjoy good relationships with rail carriers and
barge companies due, in part, to our modern coal-loading
facilities and the experience of our transportation and
distribution employees.
100
Business
SUPPLIERS
We have historically spent more than $188 million per year
to procure goods and services in support of our business
activities, excluding capital expenditures. Principal
commodities include maintenance and repair parts and services,
electricity, fuel, roof control and support items, explosives,
tires, conveyance structure, ventilation supplies and
lubricants. We use suppliers for a significant portion of our
equipment rebuilds and repairs both on- and off-site, as well as
construction and reclamation activities.
Each of our regional mining operations has developed its own
supplier base consistent with local needs. We have a centralized
sourcing group for major supplier contract negotiation and
administration, for the negotiation and purchase of major
capital goods, and to support the business units. The supplier
base has been relatively stable for many years, but there has
been some consolidation. We are not dependent on any one
supplier in any region. We promote competition between suppliers
and seek to develop relationships with those suppliers whose
focus is on lowering our costs. We seek suppliers who identify
and concentrate on implementing continuous improvement
opportunities within their area of expertise.
COMPETITION
The coal industry is intensely competitive. Our main competitors
are Massey Energy Company, Alpha Natural Resources and
Foundation Coal Holdings. The most important factors on which we
compete are coal price at the mine, coal quality and
characteristics, transportation costs and the reliability of
supply. Demand for coal and the prices that we will be able to
obtain for our coal are closely linked to coal consumption
patterns of the domestic electric generation industry which has
accounted for approximately 92% of domestic coal consumption in
recent years. These coal consumption patterns are influenced by
factors beyond our control, including the demand for electricity
which is significantly dependent upon economic activity and
summer and winter temperatures in the United States, government
regulation, technological developments and the location,
availability, quality and price of competing sources of coal,
alternative fuels such as natural gas, oil and nuclear and
alternative energy sources such as hydroelectric power.
EMPLOYEES
As of March 31, 2005, we had 1,926 employees of which 21%
were salaried and 79% were hourly. We believe our relationship
with our employees is good. All of our workforce is union free.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings arising
in the ordinary course of business. We believe we have recorded
adequate reserves for these liabilities and that there is no
individual case or group of related cases pending that is likely
to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows. With respect to any claims
relating to Horizon which arose prior to November 12, 2002,
such claims are subject to an automatic stay of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In limited circumstances, the
Bankruptcy Court has lifted the stay but only to the extent of
insurance coverage relating to Horizon. In any event, we believe
all or substantially all of the claims will be resolved in
accordance with Horizons plan of reorganization.
EQUIPMENT AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
As of December 31, 2004, our leased equipment was, on
average, 8.5 years old. We believe that a significant
portion of our equipment needs to be upgraded in the near-term.
Accordingly, we expect to retire much of our current equipment
and invest approximately $304 million in new equipment and
for mining development operations in the next two years. We
believe our capital investment plan will
101
Business
provide us with a cost-effective fleet of equipment and enable
us to improve production efficiencies. As we take advantage of
planned expansion opportunities from 2007 through 2009
principally as a result of the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions,
we expect to spend approximately $627 million on capital
expenditures which may require external financing.
While we currently operate our mines with a high percentage of
leased equipment due primarily to Horizons preference for
leasing, we will be purchasing equipment in the future. Current
equipment is leased primarily from Caterpillar Finance,
GE Capital and other leasing companies. Our operating
leases typically have a term of three to five years, with us
having the right to purchase the equipment at the end of the
lease at fair market value.
RECLAMATION
Reclamation expenses are a significant part of any coal mining
operation. Prior to commencing mining operations, a company is
required to apply for numerous permits in the state where the
mining is to occur. Before a state will approve and issue these
permits, it typically requires the mine operator to present a
reclamation plan which meets regulatory criteria and to secure a
surety bond to guarantee performance of reclamation in an amount
determined under state law. These bonding companies, in turn,
require that we backstop the surety bonds with cash and/or
letters of credit. While bonds are issued against reclamation
liability for a particular permit at a particular site,
collateral posted in support of the bond is not allocated to a
specific bond, but instead is part of a collateral pool
supporting all bonds issued by that particular insurer. Bonds
are released in phases as reclamation is completed in a
particular area.
102
Environmental and other regulatory matters
Federal, state and local authorities regulate the U.S. coal
mining industry with respect to matters such as permitting and
licensing requirements, employee health and safety, air quality
standards, water pollution, plant and wildlife protection, the
reclamation and restoration of mining properties after mining
has been completed, the discharge of materials into the
environment, surface subsidence from underground mining, and the
effects of mining on groundwater quality and availability. These
laws and regulations have had and will continue to have a
significant effect on our costs of production and competitive
position. Future legislation, regulations or orders may be
adopted or become effective which may adversely affect our
mining operations, cost structure or the ability of our
customers to use coal. For instance, new legislation,
regulations or orders, as well as future interpretations and
more rigorous enforcement of existing laws, may require
substantial increases in equipment and operating costs to us and
delays, interruptions, or a termination of operations, the
extent of which we cannot predict. Future legislation,
regulations or orders may also cause coal to become a less
attractive fuel source, resulting in a reduction in coals
share of the market for fuels used to generate electricity.
We endeavor to conduct our mining operations in compliance with
all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.
However, due in part to the extensive and comprehensive
regulatory requirements, violations during mining operations
occur from time to time in the industry.
MINING PERMITS AND APPROVALS
Numerous governmental permits or approvals are required for
mining operations. In connection with obtaining these permits
and approvals, we may be required to prepare and present to
federal, state or local authorities data pertaining to the
effect or impact that any proposed production or processing of
coal may have upon the environment. The requirements imposed by
any of these authorities may be costly and time consuming and
may delay commencement or continuation of mining operations.
Regulations also provide that a mining permit or modification
can be delayed, refused or revoked if an officer, director or a
stockholder with a 10% or greater interest in the entity is
affiliated with or is in a position to control another entity
that has outstanding permit violations. Thus, past or ongoing
violations of federal and state mining laws could provide a
basis to revoke existing permits and to deny the issuance of
additional permits.
In order to obtain mining permits and approvals from state
regulatory authorities, mine operators must submit a reclamation
plan for restoring, upon the completion of mining operations,
the mined property to its prior condition, productive use or
other permitted condition. Typically, we submit our necessary
mining permit applications several months before we plan to
begin mining a new area. In our experience, mining permit
approvals generally require 12 to 18 months after initial
submission.
SURFACE MINING CONTROL AND RECLAMATION ACT
The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, or
SMCRA, which is administered by the Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, or OSM, establishes mining,
environmental protection and reclamation standards for all
aspects of surface mining as well as many aspects of deep
mining. Mine operators must obtain SMCRA permits and permit
renewals from the OSM or the appropriate state regulatory agency
for authorization of certain mining operations that result in a
disturbance of the surface. If a state regulatory agency adopts
federal mining programs under SMCRA, the state becomes the
regulatory authority. States in which we have active mining
operations have achieved primary control of enforcement through
federal authorization.
SMCRA permit provisions include requirements for coal
prospecting, mine plan development, topsoil removal, storage and
replacement, selective handling of overburden materials, mine
pit backfilling and
103
Environmental and other regulatory matters
grading, protection of the hydrologic balance, subsidence
control for underground mines, surface drainage control, mine
drainage and mine discharge control and treatment and
revegetation.
The mining permit application process is initiated by collecting
baseline data to adequately characterize the pre-mine
environmental condition of the permit area. This work includes
surveys of cultural resources, soils, vegetation, wildlife,
assessment of surface and ground water hydrology, climatology
and wetlands. In conducting this work, we collect geologic data
to define and model the soil and rock structures and coal that
it will mine. We develop mine and reclamation plans by utilizing
this geologic data and incorporating elements of the
environmental data. The mine and reclamation plan incorporates
the provisions of SMCRA, the state programs and the
complementary environmental programs that impact coal mining.
Also included in the permit application are documents defining
ownership and agreements pertaining to coal, minerals, oil and
gas, water rights, rights of way and surface land, and documents
required by the OSMs Applicant Violator System, including
the mining and compliance history of officers, directors and
principal owners of the entity.
Once a permit application is prepared and submitted to the
regulatory agency, it goes through a completeness review and
technical review. Public notice and opportunity for public
comment on a proposed permit is required before a permit can be
issued. Some SMCRA mine permits take over a year to prepare,
depending on the size and complexity of the mine and may take
six months to two years or even longer to be issued. Regulatory
authorities have considerable discretion in the timing of the
permit issuance and the public has rights to comment on and
otherwise engage in the permitting process including through
intervention in the courts.
Before a SMCRA permit is issued, a mine operator must submit a
bond or otherwise secure the performance of reclamation
obligations. The Abandoned Mine Land Fund, which is part of
SMCRA, requires a fee on all coal produced. The proceeds are
used to reclaim mine lands closed or abandoned prior to 1977.
This program is currently set to expire September 30, 2005,
and Congress is considering various reauthorization proposals.
SMCRA stipulates compliance with many other major environmental
statues, including: the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, and the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act, or either CERCLA or Superfund.
SURETY BONDS
Federal and state laws require us to obtain surety bonds to
secure payment of certain long-term obligations including mine
closure or reclamation costs, federal and state workers
compensation costs, coal leases and other miscellaneous
obligations. Many of these bonds are renewable on a yearly basis.
Surety bond costs have increased in recent years while the
market terms of such bonds have generally become more
unfavorable. In addition, the number of companies willing to
issue surety bonds has decreased.
CLEAN AIR ACT
The federal Clean Air Act, and comparable state laws that
regulate air emissions, directly affect coal mining operations,
but have a far greater indirect affect. Direct impacts on coal
mining and processing operations may occur through permitting
requirements and/or emission control requirements relating to
particulate matter, such as fugitive dust or fine particulate
matter measuring 2.5 micrometers in diameter or smaller. The
Clean Air Act indirectly affects coal mining operations by
extensively regulating the air emissions of sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides, mercury and other compounds emitted
104
Environmental and other regulatory matters
by coal-fired electricity generating plants and coke ovens. The
general effect of such extensive regulation of emissions from
coal-fired power plants could be to reduce demand for coal.
Clean Air Act requirements that may directly or indirectly
affect our operations include the following:
Acid rain
Title IV of the Clean Air Act required a two-phase
reduction of sulfur dioxide emissions by electric utilities.
Phase II became effective in 2000 and extended the
Title IV requirements to all coal-fired power plants with
generating capacity greater than 25 Megawatts. The affected
electricity generators have sought to meet these requirements
by, among other compliance methods, switching to lower sulfur
fuels, installing pollution control devices, reducing
electricity generating levels or purchasing sulfur dioxide
emission allowances. We cannot accurately predict the effect of
these provisions of the Clean Air Act on us in future years. At
this time, we believe that implementation of Phase II has
resulted in an upward pressure on the price of lower sulfur
coals, as coal-fired power plants continue to comply with the
more stringent restrictions of Title IV.
Fine particulate matter and ozone
The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to set standards, referred to
as National Ambient Air Quality Standards, or NAAQS, for certain
pollutants. Areas that are not in compliance (referred to as
non-attainment areas) with these standards must take
steps to reduce emissions levels. In 1997, the EPA revised the
NAAQS for particulate matter and ozone; although previously
subject to legal challenge, these revisions were subsequently
upheld but implementation was delayed for several years.
For ozone, these changes include replacement of the existing
one-hour average standard with a more stringent eight-hour
average standard. On April 15, 2004, the EPA announced that
counties in 32 states fail to meet the new eight-hour
standard for ozone. States which fail to meet the new standard
will have until June 2007 to develop plans for pollution
control measures that allow them to come into compliance with
the standards. For particulates, the changes include retaining
the existing standard for particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to 10 microns, or PM10, and
adding a new standard for fine particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 microns, or
PM2.5. On December 17, 2004, the EPA announced that regions
in 20 states and the District of Columbia did not achieve
the fine particulate matter standard. Following identification
of non-attainment areas, each individual state will identify the
sources of emissions and develop emission reduction plans. These
plans may be state-specific or regional in scope. Under the
Clean Air Act, individual states have up to twelve years from
the date of designation to secure emissions reductions from
sources contributing to the problem. In addition, on
April 25, 2005, the EPA issued a finding that states have
failed to submit State Implementation Plans that satisfy the
requirements of the Clean Air Act with respect to the interstate
transport of pollutants relative to the achievement of the
8-hour ozone and the PM2.5 standards. Because of this
finding, the EPA must promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan
for any state which does not submit its own plan. Meeting the
new PM2.5 standard may require reductions of nitrogen oxide
and sulfur dioxide emissions. Future regulation and enforcement
of these new ozone and PM2.5 standards will affect many
power plants, especially coal-fired plants and all plants in
nonattainment areas.
The EPA continues to review these ambient air standards. For
example, EPA is under a court imposed deadline to decide by the
end of 2005 whether to propose a revision to the fine
particulate matter standard. EPA is also considering whether to
revise the ozone standard.
105
Environmental and other regulatory matters
Ozone
Significant additional emissions control expenditures will be
required at coal-fired power plants to meet the current NAAQS
for ozone. Nitrogen oxides, which are a by-product of coal
combustion, can lead to the creation of ozone. Accordingly,
emissions control requirements for new and expanded coal-fired
power plants and industrial boilers will continue to become more
demanding in the years ahead.
NOx SIP Call
The NOx SIP Call program was established by the EPA in October
of 1998 to reduce the transport of ozone on prevailing winds
from the Midwest and South to states in the Northeast, which
said they could not meet federal air quality standards because
of migrating pollution. Under Phase I of the program, the
EPA is requiring 90,000 tons of nitrogen oxides reductions from
power plants in 22 states east of the Mississippi River and
the District of Columbia beginning in May 2004. Phase II of
the rule requires a further reduction of about 100,000 tons of
nitrogen oxides per year by May 1, 2007. Installation of
additional control measures, such as selective catalytic
reduction devices, required under the final rules will make it
more costly to operate coal-fired electricity generating plants,
thereby making coal a less attractive fuel.
Clear Skies Initiative
The Bush Administration has proposed new legislation, commonly
referred to as the Clear Skies Initiative, that could require
dramatic reductions in nitrous oxide, sulfur dioxide, and
mercury emissions by power plants through
cap-and-trade programs similar to the existing acid
rain regulations and current NOx budget programs. The
proposed bill also authorizes up to $2.5 billion for clean
coal technology demonstration projects. There are mixed views on
whether this legislation will have a net positive or negative
effect. Congress has also considered several competing bills.
Recently, the EPA adopted a set of regulations which are
intended to limit emissions for new and existing power plants in
ways similar to the Clear Skies Initiative. The principle
regulations are the Clean Air Interstate Rule and the Clean Air
Mercury Rule, which were adopted March 15, 2005. The EPA
predicts that these rules will cause coal production to rise in
the Appalachian and Interior coal regions based on EPAs
predictions as to how states and electric utilities will decide
to implement these rules. However, those decisions have not been
made, and it is not possible to predict with certainty what, if
any, impact these rules will have on coal-buying decisions in
the future.
Interstate air quality rule
On March 10, 2005, the EPA adopted new rules for reducing
emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. This Clean Air
Interstate Rule calls for power plants in 29 eastern states and
the District of Columbia to reduce emission levels of sulfur
dioxide and nitrous oxide. The rule regulates these pollutants
under a cap and trade program similar to the system now in
effect for acid deposition control and to that proposed by the
Clear Skies Initiative. The stringency of the cap may require
many coal-fired sources to install additional pollution control
equipment, such as wet scrubbers. This increased sulfur emission
removal capability caused by the rule could result in decreased
demand for low sulfur coal, potentially driving down prices for
low sulfur coal. Emissions would be permanently capped and could
not increase. The rule seeks to cut sulfur dioxide emissions by
45% in 2010, and by 57% in 2015. The rule is likely to be
subject to judicial challenge, which makes it difficult to
determine its precise impact.
106
Environmental and other regulatory matters
Utility mercury reductions rule
On March 18, 2005, the EPA issued the Clean Air Mercury
Rule to control mercury emissions from power plants. The rule
sets a mandatory, declining cap on the total mercury emissions
allowed from coal-fired power plants nationwide. This approach,
which allows emissions trading, seeks to reduce mercury
emissions by nearly 70 percent from current levels once
facilities reach a final mercury cap which takes effect in 2018.
The rule is likely to be subject to judicial challenge, which
makes it difficult to determine its precise impact. Also subject
to judicial challenge is the EPAs decision, which was
announced concurrently with the rule, not to pursue regulation
of mercury and other pollutants from coal-fired power plants
under the Clean Air Act hazardous air pollutant program.
Other proposals for controlling mercury emissions from
coal-fired power plants have been made, such as establishing
regional emission standards. If these proposals were enacted,
the mercury content and variability of our coal would become a
factor in future sales.
Carbon dioxide
In February 2003, a number of states notified the EPA that they
planned to sue the agency to force it to set new source
performance standards for utility emissions of carbon dioxide
and to tighten existing standards for sulfur dioxide and
particulate matter for utility emissions. In June 2003,
three of these states sued the EPA seeking a court order
requiring the EPA to designate carbon dioxide as a criteria
pollutant and to issue a new NAAQS for carbon dioxide. If these
lawsuits result in the issuance of a court order requiring the
EPA to set emission limitations for carbon dioxide and/or lower
emission limitations for sulfur dioxide and particulate matter,
it could reduce the amount of coal our customers would purchase
from us.
Regional haze
The EPA has initiated a regional haze program designed to
protect and to improve visibility at and around national parks,
national wilderness areas and international parks. This program
restricts the construction of new coal-fired power plants whose
operation may impair visibility at and around federally
protected areas. Moreover, this program may require certain
existing coal-fired power plants to install additional control
measures designed to limit haze-causing emissions, such as
sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic chemicals and
particulate matter. These limitations could affect the future
market for coal.
CLEAN WATER ACT
The federal Clean Water Act, or CWA, and corresponding state
laws, affect coal mining operations by imposing restrictions of
the discharge of certain pollutants into water and on dredging
and filling wetlands. The CWA establishes in-stream water
quality standards and treatment standards for wastewater
discharge through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System, or NPDES. Regular monitoring, as well as compliance with
reporting requirements and performance standards, are
preconditions for the issuance and renewal of NPDES permits that
govern the discharge of pollutants into water.
Permits under Section 404 of the CWA are required for coal
companies to conduct dredging or filling activities in
jurisdictional waters for the purpose of creating slurry ponds,
water impoundments, refuse areas, valley fills or other mining
activities. Jurisdictional waters typically include ephemeral,
intermittent, and perennial streams and may in certain instances
include man-made conveyances that have a hydrologic connection
to a stream or wetland. Presently, under the Stream Buffer Zone
Rule, valley fills are prohibited from being placed within
100 feet of streams if negative effects on water
107
Environmental and other regulatory matters
quality are expected. OSM has proposed changes to this rule,
which would make exemptions available if mine operators take
steps to reduce the amount of waste and its effect on nearby
waters.
In particular, permits under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act are required for coal companies to conduct dredging or
filling activities in jurisdictional waters for the purpose of
creating slurry ponds, water impoundments, refuse areas, or
valley fills or other mining activities. The Army Corps of
Engineers, or ACOE, is empowered to issue nationwide
permits for specific categories of filling activity that are
determined to have minimal environmental adverse effects in
order to save the cost and time of issuing individual permits
under Section 404. Nationwide Permit 21 authorizes the
disposal of dredge-and-fill material from mining activities into
the waters of the United States. On October 23, 2003,
several citizens groups sued ACOE in the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of West Virginia seeking to
invalidate nationwide permits utilized by ACOE and
the coal industry for permitting most in-stream disturbances
associated with coal mining, including excess spoil valley fills
and refuse impoundments. The plaintiffs sought to enjoin the
prospective approval of these nationwide permits and to enjoin
some coal operators from additional use of existing nationwide
permit approvals until they obtain more detailed
individual permits. On July 8, 2004, the court
issued an order enjoining the further issuance of Nationwide 21
permits within the Southern District of West Virginia. This
decision is being appealed. Although we had no operations that
were immediately impacted or interrupted, this decision, if more
widely adopted, may require us to convert certain current and
planned applications for Nationwide 21 permits to
applications for individual permits. A similar suit challenging
the validity of Nationwide Permit 21 by ACOE for coal
mining operations in Kentucky was filed on January 27, 2005
by a number of environmental groups, Kentucky
RiverKeeper v. Rowlette, in the United States
Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. The suit seeks,
among other things, an injunction preventing ACOE to authorize
pursuant to Nationwide Permit 21, further discharges
of mining rock, dirt or coal refuse into valley fills or surface
impoundments associated with certain specific mining
permits, including permits issued to some of our mines in
Kentucky. Granting of such relief would interfere with the
further operation of these mines.
Total Maximum Daily Load, or TMDL, regulations established a
process by which states designate these stream segments
considered to be impaired (i.e., not meeting present water
quality standards). Industrial dischargers, including coal
mines, will be required to meet new TMDL effluent standards for
these stream segments.
Under Clean Water Act, states must conduct an anti-degradation
review before approving permits for the discharge of pollutants
to waters that have been designated as high quality. A
states anti-degradation regulations would prohibit the
diminution of water quality in these streams. Several
environmental groups and individuals recently challenged, and in
part successfully, West Virginias anti-degradation policy.
In general, waters discharged from coal mines to high quality
streams will be required to meet or exceed new high
quality standards. This could cause increases in the
costs, time and difficulty associated with obtaining and
complying with NPDES permits, and could aversely affect our coal
production.
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
Stringent health and safety standards have been in effect since
Congress enacted the Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969.
The Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 significantly
expanded the enforcement of safety and health standards and
imposed safety and health standards on all aspects of mining
operations. All of the states in which we operate have state
programs for mine safety and health regulation and enforcement.
Collectively, federal and state safety and health regulation in
the coal mining industry is perhaps the most comprehensive and
pervasive system for protection of employee health and safety
affecting any segment of U.S. industry. While this
regulation has a
108
Environmental and other regulatory matters
significant effect on our operating costs, the Companys
U.S. competitors are subject to the same degree of
regulation.
Under the Black Lung Benefits Revenue Act of 1977 and the Black
Lung Benefits Reform Act of 1977, as amended in 1981, each coal
mine operator must secure payment of federal black lung benefits
to claimants who are current and former employees and to a trust
fund for the payment of benefits and medical expenses to
claimants who last worked in the coal industry prior to
July 1, 1973. The trust fund is funded by an excise tax on
production of up to $1.10 per ton for underground coal and
up to $0.55 per ton for surface-mined coal, neither amount
to exceed 4.4% of the gross sales price. The excise tax does not
apply to coal shipped outside the United States. In 2003, we
recorded $10.3 million of expense related to this excise
tax.
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT
RCRA affects coal mining operations by establishing requirements
for the treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous wastes.
Certain coal mine wastes, such as overburden and coal cleaning
wastes, are exempted from hazardous waste management.
Subtitle C of RCRA exempted fossil fuel combustion wastes
from hazardous waste regulation until the EPA completed a report
to Congress and, in 1993, made a determination on whether the
wastes should be regulated as hazardous. In the 1993 regulatory
determination, the EPA addressed some high volume-low toxicity
coal combustion wastes generated at electric utility and
independent power producing facilities, such as coal ash.
In May 2000, the EPA concluded that coal combustion wastes do
not warrant regulation as hazardous under RCRA and that the
hazardous waste exemption for these wastes. However, the EPA has
determined that national non-hazardous waste regulations under
RCRA Subtitle D are needed for coal combustion wastes
disposed in surface impoundments and landfills and used as
mine-fill. The agency also concluded beneficial uses of these
wastes, other than for mine-filling, pose no significant risk
and no additional national regulations are needed. As long as
this exemption remains in effect, it is not anticipated that
regulation of coal combustion waste will have any material
effect on the amount of coal used by electricity generators.
Most state hazardous waste laws also exempt coal combustion
waste, and instead treat it as either a solid waste or a special
waste. Any costs associated with handling or disposal of coal
combustion wastes would increase our customers operating
costs and potentially reduce their coal purchases. In addition,
contamination caused by the past disposal of ash can lead to
material liability.
Due to the hazardous waste exemption for coal combustion waste
such as ash, much coal combustion waste is currently put to
beneficial use. For example, in one Pennsylvania mine from which
we have the right to receive coal, the Company has used some ash
as mine fill. The ash used for this purpose is mixed with lime
and serves to help alleviate the potential for acid mine
drainage.
FEDERAL AND STATE SUPERFUND STATUTES
Superfund and similar state laws affect coal mining and hard
rock operations by creating liability for investigation and
remediation in response to releases of hazardous substances into
the environment and for damages to natural resources caused by
such releases. Under Superfund, joint and several liability may
be imposed on waste generators, site owners or operators and
others regardless of fault. In addition, mining operations may
have reporting obligations under these laws.
109
Environmental and other regulatory matters
CLIMATE CHANGE
Although the United States has refused to join the 1992
Framework Convention on Global Climate Change, commonly known as
the Kyoto Protocol, future regulation of greenhouse gas could
occur either pursuant to future U.S. treaty obligations or
pursuant to statutory or regulatory changes under the Clean Air
Act. The Bush Administration has proposed a package of voluntary
emission reductions for greenhouse gases reduction targets which
provide for certain incentives if targets are met. The Climate
Stewardship Act which was recently reintroduced into the Senate,
would require a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions to 2000
levels by 2010 by capping the overall greenhouse gas emissions
from the power, transportation, industrial, and commercial
sectors, and by creating a market for individual companies to
trade pollution credits. Some states, such as Massachusetts,
have already issued regulations regulating greenhouse gas
emissions from large power plants. Increased efforts to control
greenhouse gas emissions, including the future joining of the
Kyoto Protocol, could result in reduced demand for coal if
electric power generators switch to lower carbon sources of
fuel. If the United States were to ratify the Kyoto Protocol,
our nation would be required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
to 93% of 1990 levels in a series of phased reductions from 2008
to 2012.
COAL INDUSTRY RETIREE HEALTH BENEFIT ACT OF 1992
Unlike many companies in the coal business, we do not have
significant liabilities under the Coal Industry Retiree Health
Benefit Act of 1992 (the Coal Act), which
requires the payment of substantial sums to provide lifetime
health benefits to union-represented miners (and their
dependents) who retired before 1992, because liabilities under
the Coal Act that had been imposed on our predecessor or
acquired companies were retained by the sellers and, if
applicable, their parent companies, in the applicable
acquisition agreements. We should not be liable for these
liabilities retained by the sellers unless they and, if
applicable, their parent companies, fail to satisfy their
obligations with respect to Coal Act claims and retained
liabilities covered by the acquisition agreements.
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
The federal Endangered Species Act and counterpart state
legislation protect species threatened with possible extinction.
Protection of threatened and endangered species may have the
effect of prohibiting or delaying us from obtaining mining
permits and may include restrictions on timber harvesting, road
building and other mining or agricultural activities in areas
containing the affected species or their habitats. A number of
species indigenous to our properties are protected under the
Endangered Species Act. Based on the species that have been
identified to date and the current application of applicable
laws and regulations, however, we do not believe there are any
species protected under the Endangered Species Act that would
materially and adversely affect our ability to mine coal from
our properties in accordance with current mining plans.
110
Management
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of
our executive officers and directors:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position(s) |
|
Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.
|
|
67 |
|
Non-Executive Chairman and Director |
Bennett K. Hatfield
|
|
48 |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
William D. Campbell
|
|
57 |
|
Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary |
Roger L. Nicholson
|
|
44 |
|
Senior Vice President and General Counsel |
Samuel R. Kitts
|
|
43 |
|
Senior Vice President, West Virginia and Maryland Operations |
William Scott Perkins
|
|
49 |
|
Senior Vice President, Kentucky and Illinois Operations |
Phillip Michael Hardesty
|
|
42 |
|
Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing |
Oren Eugene Kitts
|
|
50 |
|
Senior Vice President, Mining Services |
Jon R. Bauer
|
|
48 |
|
Director |
Cynthia B. Bezik
|
|
52 |
|
Director |
William J. Catacosinos
|
|
75 |
|
Director |
Marcia L. Page
|
|
44 |
|
Director |
Wendy L. Teramoto
|
|
31 |
|
Director |
Each executive officer serves at the discretion of our board of
directors and holds office until his or her successor is elected
and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or
removal. There are no family relationships among any of our
directors or executive officers other than among two of our
executive officers, Samuel R. Kitts and Oren Eugene Kitts, who
are brothers.
Set forth below is certain background information relating to
our executive officers and directors as of June 14, 2005.
Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. Non-Executive Chairman
Mr. Ross has served as the Non-Executive Chairman of our
board of directors since April 2005 and has served in the same
capacity at ICG, Inc. since October 2004. Mr. Ross is the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WL Ross &
Co. LLC, a merchant banking firm, a position he has held since
April 2000. Mr. Ross is also the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of WLR Recovery Fund L.P., WLR Recovery
Fund II L.P., Asia Recovery Fund, Asia Recovery
Fund Co-Investment, Nippon Investment Partners and Absolute
Recovery Hedge Fund. Mr. Ross is also Chairman of
International Textiles Group, Inc. and Nano-Tex, LLC in the
United States. Mr. Ross is a board member of Mittal Steel
Company, N.V. (which recently acquired International Steel
Group, Inc.) in the Netherlands, Insuratex, Ltd. in Bermuda,
Nikko Electric Co. and Ohizumi Manufacturing Company in Japan,
Tong Yang Life Insurance Co. in Korea, and of Syms Corp.,
Clarent Hospital Corp. and News Communications Inc. in the
United States. Mr. Ross is also a member of the Business
Roundtable. Previously, Mr. Ross served as the Executive
Managing Director at Rothschild Inc., an investment banking
firm, from October 1974 to March 2000. Mr. Ross was also
formerly Chairman of the Smithsonian Institution National Board
and currently is a board member of the Japan Society and the
Yale University School of Management. He holds an A.B. from Yale
University and an M.B.A., with distinction, from Harvard
University.
111
Management
Bennett K. Hatfield President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
Mr. Hatfield has been our President and Chief Executive
Officer since March 2005. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hatfield
served as President, Eastern Operations of Arch Coal, Inc. from
March 2003 until March 2005. Prior to joining Arch Coal, Inc.,
Mr. Hatfield was Executive Vice President of El Paso
Energys Coastal Coal Company from December 2001 through
February 2003. That assignment was preceded by a lengthy career
with Massey Energy Company where he last served as Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from June 1998
through December 2001. Mr. Hatfield has a B.S. in mining
engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and University.
William D. Campbell Vice President, Treasurer and
Secretary
Mr. Campbell has been our Vice President and Treasurer
since March 2005 and our Secretary since April 2005.
Mr. Campbell was a Vice President and Treasurer of ICG,
Inc. since October 2004. Prior to his employment with us,
Mr. Campbell held various positions with our predecessor.
From November 2003 until September 2004, Mr. Campbell was
Horizons Vice President and Controller and Vice President,
Planning and Budgets from June 2002 until October 2003. From
1998 until June 2002, Mr. Campbell was Assistant
Controller Operations/ Budget/ Forecasts at AEI Resources,
Inc. Mr. Campbell received his B.S. in accounting from
Brescia College.
Roger L. Nicholson Senior Vice President and General
Counsel
Mr. Nicholson has been our Senior Vice President and
General Counsel since April 2005. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Nicholson was a member at the law firm of Jackson
Kelly, PLLC from April 2002 to March 2005. His practice focused
on energy and natural resources, mergers and acquisitions and
commercial and mineral real estate. Before joining Jackson
Kelly, PLLC, Mr. Nicholson served as Vice President,
Secretary and General Counsel of Massey Energy Company. He
earned a B.S. in economics from Georgetown College and a J.D.
from the University of Kentucky.
Samuel R. Kitts Senior Vice President, West Virginia
and Maryland Operations
Mr. Kitts has been our Senior Vice President, West Virginia
Operations since April 2005. Prior to his employment with us,
Mr. Kitts was the Vice President of Alpha Natural Resources
Services since April 2003 and the President of Brooks Run Mining
Co. from March 2002. Prior to that time, Mr. Kitts held
various management positions at Massey Energy Company.
Mr. Kitts received both a B.S. in geology and an M.B.A.
from Marshall University.
William Scott Perkins Senior Vice President, Kentucky
and Illinois Operations
Mr. Perkins has been our Senior Vice President, Eastern
Operations since April 2005 and held the same positions at ICG,
Inc. since January 2005. Prior to his employment with us,
Mr. Perkins held various positions with our predecessors.
From July 2003 through January 2005, Mr. Perkins was the
Vice President and General Manager of the Evergreen Mining
Company Division of Horizon, the Vice President and General
Manager of Horizons Kentucky Division Union Free
Horizon Natural Resources from October 2001 until June 2003 and
the Vice President Appalachian region Union Free Surface
Operations of AEI Resources from May 1999 until September 2001.
Mr. Perkins received his B.S. in geology from Kansas State
University.
Phillip Michael Hardesty Senior Vice President,
Sales and Marketing
Mr. Hardesty has been our Senior Vice President,
Sales and Marketing since April 2005. Previously,
Mr. Hardesty held various positions with Arch Coal, Inc.
From January 2005 through April 2005, Mr. Hardesty was Vice
President, Commercial Optimization, Vice President, Market
Services from
112
Management
2002 until 2004 and Director Market Services from 1999 until
2001. Mr. Hardesty received his B.S. in accounting from
University of Kentucky.
Oren Eugene Kitts Senior Vice President, Mining
Services
Mr. Kitts has been our Senior Vice President, Mining
Services since April 2005. Prior to his employment with us,
Mr. Kitts was most recently Vice President,
Environmental & Technical Affairs for Eastern
Operations at Arch Coal, Inc. from May 2003 until the present.
Prior to Arch, Mr. Kitts was a partner in Summit
Engineering Company from May 1996 until May 2003 and prior to
that was President of Massey Coal Services. Mr. Kitts
initially worked for Pickands Mather Company as the
environmental engineer at their coal mining operations in
Southern West Virginia and Eastern Kentucky. Mr. Kitts has
a B.S. in civil engineering from West Virginia University.
Jon R. Bauer Director
Mr. Bauer has served as our Director since April 2005 and
as a Director of ICG, Inc. since October 2004. Since May 1995,
Mr. Bauer has been the managing member and chief investment
officer of Contrarian Capital Management LLC, a multi-strategy
distressed securities money management firm. From July 1986 to
May 1995, he was managing director at Oppenheimer &
Co., Inc. where he founded the High Yield Department.
Mr. Bauer is also a director of Arpeggio Acquisition Corp.
Mr. Bauer received a bachelors degree (with honors) from
Rutgers College and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
Cynthia B. Bezik Director
Ms. Bezik has been a Director since April 2005 and as a
Director of ICG, Inc. since December 2004. Ms. Bezik has
over twenty-five years of financial management experience.
Ms. Bezik is currently a financial consultant to the
$300 million Senior Secured Noteholders in the contested
WCI Steel bankruptcy proceedings. She was senior Vice
President Finance and Chief Financial Officer at
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc, from 1997 through 2003. Prior to that, she
was the Treasurer at Cleveland-Cliffs since 1994.
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., a NYSE-listed company, is a major
supplier to the steel industry. Earlier in her career, she was
on the audit staff of Ernst & Young, LLP, and worked
for AM International, a large manufacturing concern.
Ms. Bezik was a Director and chair of the Audit Committee
of Oxford Automotive, Inc., a privately held, tier-one
automotive supplier, prior to its filing for reorganization in
2004. In addition, she is on the Board of Trustees and the
Executive Committee and serves as Treasurer of the Achievement
Centers for Children, a non-profit organization serving special
needs children in Northeastern Ohio. Ms. Bezik is a CMA
(Certified Management Accountant) and holds an M.B.A. from Case
Western Reserve University.
William J. Catacosinos Director
Mr. Catacosinos has been a Director since April 2005 and as
a Director of ICG, Inc. since December 2004. Since November
1998, Dr. Catacosinos has served as Managing Partner of
Laurel Hill Capital Partners. He also serves as the Chairman,
President and CEO of TNP Enterprises, Inc., the parent of
Texas-New Mexico Power, an electric utility located in
Fort Worth, Texas. Dr. Catacosinos was Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Long Island Lighting Company from
January 1984 to July 1998. Dr. Catacosinos is also a
director of Preservation Sciences, Inc., a company in St.
Petersburg, Florida, that researches, develops and markets
preservatives and preservative technologies for food, beverage
and industrial products. He earned a B.S. degree, an M.B.A. and
a Ph.D. in Economics from New York University.
113
Management
Marcia L. Page Director
Ms. Page has served as a Director since April 2005 and as a
Director of ICG, Inc. since October 2004. Since May 1994,
Ms. Page has been a Managing Partner of Värde
Partners, Inc., an investment management firm focused on
distressed debt and other event-driven strategies. Prior to
funding Värde, Ms. Page was Vice President of
EBF & Associates. Prior to EBF, she managed
fixed-income portfolios for Cargill Financial Services
Corporation. Ms. Page earned her B.A. (magna cum laude)
from Gustavus Adolphus College and an M.B.A. from the University
of Minnesota.
Wendy L. Teramoto Director
Ms. Teramoto has been a Director since October 2004 and was
Secretary of ICG, Inc. from October 2004 until April 2005.
Ms. Teramoto is also chairman of the Board of Directors of
Anker and Sole Manager and chief executive officer of CoalQuest.
Ms. Teramoto has been a Vice President at WL
Ross & Co. LLC since April 2000. Prior to joining WL
Ross & Co., Ms. Teramoto worked at Rothschild
Inc., an investment banking firm. Ms. Teramoto received a
B.S. in accounting and finance from the University of Colorado.
COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD
Our board of directors currently consists of seven directors,
five of whom meet the independence standards of The New York
Stock Exchange. Following this offering, we expect to appoint an
additional director.
Classified board of directors
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides
that our board of directors be divided into three classes of
directors, as nearly equal in number as possible, serving
staggered terms. Approximately one-third of our board will be
elected each year. At any meeting of stockholders at which
directors are to be elected, the number of directors elected may
not exceed the greatest number of directors then in office in
any class of directors. Under Section 141 of the General
Corporation Law of Delaware, directors serving on a classified
board can only be removed for cause. The provision for our
classified board may be amended, altered or repealed only upon
the affirmative vote of the holders of 80% of our outstanding
voting stock.
The provision for a classified board could prevent a party that
acquires control of a majority of the outstanding voting stock
from obtaining control of our board until the second annual
stockholders meeting following the date the acquiror obtains the
controlling stock interest. The classified board provision could
have the effect of discouraging a potential acquiror from making
a tender offer for our shares or otherwise attempting to obtain
control of us and could increase the likelihood that our
incumbent directors will retain their positions.
We believe that a classified board helps to assure the
continuity and stability of our board and our business
strategies and policies as determined by our board, because a
majority of the directors at any given time will have prior
experience on our board. The classified board provision also
helps to ensure that our board, if confronted with an
unsolicited proposal from a third party that has acquired a
block of our voting stock will have sufficient time to review
the proposal and appropriate alternatives and to seek the best
available result for all stockholders.
Number of directors; removal; vacancies
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
provide that the number of directors be set by resolution
adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the total
number of directors that we would have if there were no
vacancies on our board. This provision regarding the size of our
board
114
Management
may not be amended, altered, changed or repealed in any respect
without the affirmative vote of 80% of our outstanding voting
stock.
Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, each director serves until his or her successor
is duly elected and qualified, unless he or she dies, resigns,
retires, becomes disqualified or is removed. Our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation also provides that,
subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred
stock, directors may be removed, but only for cause by the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of our voting
stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation further
provides that newly created directorships in our board may only
be filled by a resolution approved by a majority of our board,
provided a quorum is present, and any other vacancies in our
board may be filled by a resolution approved by a majority of
our board, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining
director. Any director chosen to fill a newly created
directorship will hold office for a term that will coincide with
the remaining term of that class. For other vacancies, the
chosen director will hold office for the remaining term as that
of his or her predecessor.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Our board of directors has a standing audit committee,
compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance
committee.
Audit committee
Our audit committee currently consists of Jon R. Bauer, Cynthia
B. Bezik and William J. Catacosinos, all of whom meet the
relevant New York Stock Exchange independence requirements. In
addition, Cynthia B. Bezik meets The New York Stock Exchange
standard of possessing accounting or related financial
management expertise. The audit committee oversees the
engagement of independent public accountants, reviews our annual
financial statements and the scope of annual audits and
considers matters relating to accounting policies and internal
controls.
The board of directors has approved and adopted a Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics for all directors, officers and
employees, a copy of which will be available on our website and
upon written request by our stockholders at no cost.
Compensation committee
Our compensation committee currently consists of Cynthia B.
Bezik and Marcia L. Page, both of whom meet the relevant New
York Stock Exchange requirements. The compensation committee
reviews, approves and makes recommendations to our board of
directors concerning our compensation practices, policies and
procedures for our executive officers. The compensation
committees duties include the administration of our stock
option plans, equity incentive plans and compensation
arrangements for our executives.
Nominating and corporate governance committee
Our nominating and corporate governance committee currently
consists of Jon R. Bauer and William J. Catacosinos,
both of whom meet the relevant New York Stock Exchange
requirements. The duties of the nominating and corporate
governance committee include, among other things, identifying
individuals qualified to become members of our board of
directors, recommending candidates to fill vacancies and
newly-created positions on our board of directors, recommending
whether incumbent directors should be nominated for re-election
to our board of directors and developing and recommending
corporate governance principles applicable to our board of
directors and our
115
Management
employees. We intend to comply with the recently enacted New
York Stock Exchange corporate governance rules with respect to
nominating and corporate governance committees once we are
listed on The New York Stock Exchange.
DIRECTORS COMPENSATION
Members of our board of directors currently are not compensated
for serving on the board of directors other than for travel or
other expenses incurred in connection with their service, nor
are they paid a retainer or additional compensation for
attendance at board or committee meetings. However, we currently
compensate two of our non-employee directors, Cynthia B. Bezik
and William J. Catacosinos, in the amount of $50,000 per
year and $1,600 per meeting and upon completion of this
offering, we will compensate our other non-employee directors in
the same manner.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER
PARTICIPATION
None of our executive officers serves or has served as a member
of the board of directors, compensation committee or other board
committee performing equivalent functions of any entity that has
one or more executive officers serving as one of our directors
or on our compensation committee.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth information concerning the
compensation of our chief executive officer and our other four
most highly compensated executive officers for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Summary compensation table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual compensation | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other annual | |
|
All other | |
|
|
|
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
compensation(1) | |
|
compensation | |
Name and principal position |
|
Year | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
| |
Bennett K. Hatfield, President and
Chief Executive
Officer(2)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
George R. Desko, Chief Executive
Officer(4)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coy K. Lane, Senior Vice President of
Operations(5)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William D. Campbell, Vice President and
Treasurer(6)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
265,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
William Scott Perkins, President ICG
Eastern(7)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
James Ketron, Vice President and General
Counsel(8)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger L. Nicholson, Senior Vice President and General
Counsel(9)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Samuel R. Kitts, Senior Vice President, West Virginia and
Maryland Operations
(10)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
(1) |
Other annual compensation for fiscal 2005 has not been
disclosed when the total value is less than the lesser of 10% of
individuals annual salary or $50,000. |
|
(2) |
Mr. Hatfield became our President and Chief Executive
Officer in March 2005. For 2005, Mr. Hatfield will receive
an annual salary of $500,000, and is entitled to certain other
perquisites. For other information about his compensation, see
Employment agreements below. |
116
Management
|
|
(3) |
Executives are entitled to the use of a company-owned
vehicle. |
|
(4) |
Mr. Desko was ICG, Inc.s Interim President and Chief
Executive Officer from October 2004 until March 2005. |
|
(5) |
Mr. Lane was ICG, Inc.s Senior Vice President of
Operations until January 2005. |
|
(6) |
Mr. Campbell also became our Secretary in April 2005. |
|
(7) |
Mr. Perkins was ICG, Inc.s Vice President, ICG
Eastern until January 2005, when he became our Senior Vice
President, Kentucky and Illinois. |
|
(8) |
Mr. Ketron was ICG, Inc.s Vice President and
General Counsel until February 2005. |
|
(9) |
Mr. Nicholson became our Senior Vice President and General
Counsel in April 2005. For 2005, Mr. Nicholson will receive
an annual salary of $260,000 and certain other perquisites, see
Employment agreements below. |
|
|
(10) |
Mr. Kitts became our Senior Vice President, West Virginia and
Maryland Operations in April 2005. For 2005, Mr. Kitts will
receive an annual salary of $250,000. |
Employee benefit plans
There were no individual grants of stock options made during the
year ended December 31, 2004 to any of the named executive
officers. Prior to the effectiveness of the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part, we expect to adopt
a plan and grant stock options and restricted shares to our
executive officers, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Restricted | |
|
Exercise Price | |
Name |
|
Options Granted(1) | |
|
Stock(1) | |
|
per Share | |
| |
William D. Campbell
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Phillip Michael Hardesty
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Bennett K. Hatfield
|
|
|
319,052 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
10.97 |
|
Oren Eugene Kitts
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Samuel R. Kitts
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Roger L. Nicholson
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
William Scott Perkins
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
(1) |
All option and restricted share grants will be grants 25%
vested upon grant, with the remaining vesting ratably over three
years. |
|
(2) |
To be priced at the price of the shares of common stock sold
in this offering. |
Employment agreements
We currently have an employment agreement with Bennett K.
Hatfield our President and Chief Executive Officer and Roger L.
Nicholson, our Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
Bennett K. Hatfield. On March 14, 2005, we entered
into an employment agreement with Bennett K. Hatfield to serve
as our President, Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our
board of directors. The initial term of Mr. Hatfields
employment agreement ends on March 31, 2008, unless
extended in one-year increments beginning on March 31,
2007. The employment agreement provides a base salary to
Mr. Hatfield of $500,000 per year, subject to annual
review by the board of directors. In addition, Mr. Hatfield
is entitled to receive an annual bonus based upon the
achievement of certain results measured by us meeting certain
EBITDA, earnings before interest taxes, depreciation and
amortization, targets. For 2005 and 2006,
Mr. Hatfields bonus will not be less than
$500,000 per year. Under the terms of the employment
agreement, Mr. Hatfield will receive term life insurance in
the amount of $3.0 million for a period of 120 months
owned by a designee of Mr. Hatfield, and will be eligible
to participate in employee benefit plans and programs adopted by
us for executive level employees.
117
Management
Pursuant to the employment agreement and the expected terms of
our 2005 Management Equity Incentive Compensation Plan,
Mr. Hatfield has been granted (i) $3.5 million of
stock options, which vest 25% on the date of grant and 25%
annually on each March 14, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
(ii) 206,250 restricted shares of common stock, which vest
in three equal installments annually on each March 14,
2006, 2007 and 2008, and (iii) 68,750 shares of common
stock. Should certain events occur, such as an underwritten
public offering that meets certain criteria, a change of
control or the termination of Mr. Hatfields
employment for cause or for good reason
(as such terms are defined in the employment agreement), all of
the unrestricted shares and options will immediately vest and
the options will become immediately exercisable. If
Mr. Hatfield makes a timely election under
Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to include the
restricted shares in gross income for 2005, we will pay
Mr. Hatfield an income tax gross-up payment to make
Mr. Hatfield whole for the income tax impact of the
restricted and unrestricted shares of common stock received by
Mr. Hatfield.
We may terminate Mr. Hatfields employment at any time
and for any reason and Mr. Hatfield may resign at any time
and for any reason. If Mr. Hatfields employment is
terminated by us without cause or if
Mr. Hatfield resigns for good reason (as such
terms are defined in the employment agreement), we will be
required to pay Mr. Hatfield (i) his accrued but
unpaid salary and bonus compensation through the date of
termination, (ii) the bonus compensation for the year of
termination, prorated to the amount of time actually employed
during such year and (iii) subject to
Mr. Hatfields compliance with the non-solicitation
provisions, a severance payment of three times base salary and
three times annual bonus compensation (measured using the
previous years bonus payment), along with coverage under
the Companys welfare benefit programs for a period not to
exceed two years. Such severance compensation will be paid
quarterly over the two year period following the date of
Mr. Hatfields termination of employment. In the event
that the severance payments or benefits would subject
Mr. Hatfield to an excise tax because such payments or
benefits are deemed to be excess parachute payments
within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
Code, then Mr. Hatfield would be entitled to a tax gross-up
payment to restore Mr. Hatfield to the same after-tax
position that he would have been in if the excise tax had not
been imposed.
Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Hatfield
may not disclose any confidential information or data concerning
us or our business during the term of Mr. Hatfields
employment and thereafter. In addition, during
Mr. Hatfields term of employment and for a period of
two years following the date Mr. Hatfield ceases to be
employed by us, Mr. Hatfield may neither solicit certain of
our employees to leave our employment nor solicit our customers
or business associates to cease doing business with us.
Roger L. Nicholson. We entered into an employment
agreement with Roger L. Nicholson, effective as of
April 25, 2005, to serve as Senior Vice President and
General Counsel. The initial term of Mr. Nicholsons
employment agreement ends on March 31, 2008. The employment
agreement provides a base salary to Mr. Nicholson of
$260,000 per year, subject to annual review by the board of
directors. Mr. Nicholson received a signing bonus payment
of $20,000 as compensation for certain unvested benefits lost by
virtue of his resignation of employment from his prior employer.
In addition, Mr. Nicholson is entitled to receive an annual
bonus based upon the achievement of certain results measured by
us meeting certain EBITDA, earnings before interest taxes,
depreciation and amortization, targets. For 2005,
Mr. Nicholsons bonus will not be less than $104,000.
Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Nicholson
will be eligible to participate in employee benefit plans and
programs adopted by us for executive level employees.
Pursuant to the employment agreement and the terms of the 2005
Management Equity Incentive Compensation Plan,
Mr. Nicholson has been granted (i) options to
purchase 50,000 shares of common stock, 25% of which
vested on the date of grant and 25% which will vest annually on
each April 25, 2006, 2007 and 2008, (ii) 37,500
restricted shares of common stock, which will vest in three equal
118
Management
installments annually on each April 25, 2006, 2007 and
2008, and (iii) 12,500 unrestricted shares of common stock.
We may terminate Mr. Nicholsons employment at any
time and for any reason and Mr. Nicholson may resign at any
time and for any reason. If Mr. Nicholsons employment
is terminated by us without cause or if
Mr. Nicholson resigns for good reason (as such
terms are defined in the employment agreement), we will be
required to pay Mr. Nicholson (i) his accrued but
unpaid salary and bonus compensation through the date of
termination, (ii) the bonus compensation for the year of
termination, prorated to the amount of time actually employed
during such year and (iii) subject to
Mr. Nicholsons compliance with the non-solicitation
provisions, a severance payment of three times base salary and
three times annual bonus compensation (measured using the
previous years bonus payment), along with coverage under
the our medical and dental programs for a period not to exceed
two years. Such severance compensation will be paid quarterly
over the two year period following the date of
Mr. Nicholsons termination of employment.
Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Nicholson
may not disclose any confidential information or data concerning
us or our business during the term of Mr. Nicholsons
employment and thereafter. In addition, during
Mr. Nicholsons term of employment and for a period of
two years following the date Mr. Nicholson ceases to be
employed by us, Mr. Nicholson may neither solicit certain
of our employees to leave our employment nor solicit our
customers or business associates to cease doing business with us.
RELATED MATTERS
Mr. Hatfield, along with Massey Energy Company and certain other
executive officers and directors of Massey Energy Company, was
named as an individual defendant in a shareholder derivative
action, Philip R. Arlia v. Don L. Blankenship, et al., and
Massey Energy Company, filed on August 5, 2002, in the
Circuit Court of Boone County, West Virginia, Civil Action No.
02-C-139. The plaintiff alleges three separate claims:
(1) breach of fiduciary duties based upon the individual
defendants positions as directors and/or officers of
Massey; (2) misappropriation of Masseys confidential
information in connection with alleged insider trading by
certain individual defendants; and (3) waste of corporate
assets in connection with the alleged insider trading. All of
the defendants have filed motions to dismiss in 2003. Although
discovery has begun, the parties have been in mediation to
discuss settlement terms. The trial is scheduled to begin in
February 2006.
119
Principal stockholders
The following table and accompanying footnotes show information
regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock before
and after this offering by:
|
|
4 |
each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5%
of our common stock; |
|
4 |
each member of our board of directors and each of our named
executive officers; and |
|
4 |
all members of our board of directors and our executive officers
as a group. |
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. We believe that
each stockholder named in the table has sole voting and
dispositive power for the shares shown as beneficially owned by
them.
The number of shares and percentages of beneficial ownership
before the offering set forth below are based on
106,605,999 shares of our common stock issued and
outstanding as of March 31, 2005. The number of shares and
percentages of beneficial ownership after the offering are based
on shares
of our common stock to be issued and outstanding immediately
after this offering, including the shares of common stock
expected to be issued in connection with the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
owned after the offering | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Assuming | |
|
Assuming | |
|
|
Shares beneficially | |
|
the underwriters | |
|
the underwriters | |
|
|
owned | |
|
option is | |
|
option is | |
|
|
prior to the offering | |
|
not exercised | |
|
exercised in full | |
Name and address of |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
beneficial owner |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
| |
Värde Coal Inc. |
|
|
9,868,755 |
|
|
|
9.26% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attn: Kathy Ricke
8500 Normandale Lake
Boulevard
Suite 1570
Minneapolis, MN 55347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contrarian Capital Management LLC |
|
|
10,822,865 |
|
|
|
10.15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attn: Michael J. Restifo
411 West Putnam Avenue
Suite 225
Greenwich, CT 06830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WLR Recovery Fund II, L.P. |
|
|
9,804,172 |
|
|
|
9.20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attn: Wendy Teramoto
101 East
52nd
Street
19th
Floor
New York, NY 10022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shepherd International Coal Holdings Inc. |
|
|
7,670,349 |
|
|
|
7.20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attn: Colin M. Lancaster
3600 S. Lake Drive
St. Francis, WI 53235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
Principal stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
owned after the offering | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Assuming | |
|
Assuming | |
|
|
Shares beneficially | |
|
the underwriters | |
|
the underwriters | |
|
|
owned | |
|
option is | |
|
option is | |
|
|
prior to the offering | |
|
not exercised | |
|
exercised in full | |
Name and address of |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
beneficial owner |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
| |
Stark Trading |
|
|
7,670,350 |
|
|
|
7.20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attn: Colin M. Lancaster
3600 S. Lake Drive
St. Francis, WI 53235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Point LLC |
|
|
10,001,045 |
|
|
|
9.38% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attn: Lloyd Blumberg
360 Madison Ave
24th
Floor
New York, NY 10017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilbur L. Ross,
Jr.(1) |
|
|
9,804,172 |
|
|
|
9.20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bennett K.
Hatfield(2) |
|
|
68,750 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William D.
Campbell(2)
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip Michael
Hardesty(2)
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oren Eugene
Kitts(2)
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel R.
Kitts(2)
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger L.
Nicholson(2)
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Scott
Perkins(2)
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jon R.
Bauer(3) |
|
|
10,822,865 |
|
|
|
10.15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George R. Desko |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marcia L.
Page(4)
|
|
|
9,868,755 |
|
|
|
9.26% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)
(1)(2)(3)(4) |
|
|
30,972,361 |
|
|
|
29.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents 9,804,172 shares of common stock held of
record by WLR Recovery Fund II L.P. Mr. Ross serves as
a principal of WL Ross & Co. LLC, which manages
WLR Recovery Fund II L.P. To the extent Mr. Ross is
deemed to beneficially own these shares as a result of his
position as a principal of WL Ross & Co. LLC,
Mr. Ross disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. |
|
(2) |
Represents restricted shares and options to purchase shares
of our common stock which are currently exercisable. |
|
(3) |
Represents 10,822,865 shares of common stock held of
record by investment management clients of Contrarian Capital
Management LLC. Mr. Bauer serves as the Managing Member of
Contrarian Capital Management LLC. To the extent Mr. Bauer
is deemed to beneficially own these shares as a result of his
position as the Managing Member of Contrarian Capital Management
LLC, Mr. Bauer disclaims beneficial ownership of these
shares. |
|
(4) |
Represents 9,868,755 shares of common stock held of
record by Värde Coal Inc. All of these shares are
controlled by Värde Partners, Inc., Värde Management,
Inc. or Värde Management International, Inc., which are
controlled by Ms. Page, Gregory S. McMillan and George G.
Hicks. Ms. Page and Messrs. McMillan and Hicks are
(i) the principals, directors and managing partners of
Värde Partners, Inc. and (ii) the principals,
directors and vice president of Värde Management, Inc. and
Värde Management International, Inc. To the extent
Ms. Page is deemed to beneficially own these shares as a
result of her position as a principal director or managing
partner or vice president of Värde Partners, Inc.
Värde Management Inc. or Värde Management
International, Inc., Ms. Page disclaims beneficial
ownership of these shares. |
121
Certain relationships and related party transactions
Under the Advisory Services Agreement, dated as of
October 1, 2004 between ICG, Inc. and
WL Ross & Co. LLC, WLR has agreed to provide
advisory services to ICG, Inc. (consisting of consulting and
advisory services in connection with strategic and financial
planning, investment management and administration and other
matters relating to the business and operation of ICG, Inc. of a
type customarily provided by sponsors of U.S. private
equity firms to companies in which they have substantial
investments, including any consulting or advisory services which
the Board of Directors reasonably requests). WLR is to be paid a
quarterly fee of $500,000 and reimbursed for any reasonable out
of pocket expenses (including expenses of third-party advisors
retained by WLR). ICG will assume the Advisory Services
Agreement in connection with the corporate reorganization.
The advisory services agreement is for a term until the earlier
of (i) the entry of a final non-appealable judgment that
WLR is in breach of its obligation under the agreement or in
breach of its duty of loyalty to ICG, Inc. as an equity holder;
(ii) the seventh anniversary of the effective date; or
(iii) the 30th day after receipt by WLR of a termination
payment (as defined in the agreement). ICG, Inc. also has the
right to terminate the agreement upon written notice to WLR
following (i) the 90th day after which WLR and its
affiliated entities cease to own at least 25% of the ICG, Inc.
equity beneficially owned by them on the effective date of the
agreement or (ii) the 30th day after which Wilbur L.
Ross, Jr. is no longer affiliated with or involved in the
business of WLR.
On October 1, 2004, ICG entered into an agreement with
Insuratex, LTD, a wholly owned subsidiary of funds controlled by
WLR, to administer and pay workers compensation claims
incurred by ICG. ICG paid an initial $2.5 million premium to
fund such claims and will continue to pay monthly installments
of $0.2 million until a total premium of $5.0 million is
paid by ICG. The $5.0 million annual premium is to be adjusted
after the initial 18 months based on actual workers
compensation loss experienced. We believe that the rates, terms
and provisions contained in this agreement are comparable to
those that we could have obtained through negotiations with an
unrelated party.
122
Description of indebtedness
OUR CREDIT FACILITY
In connection with the Horizon asset acquisition in the third
quarter of 2004, our subsidiary, ICG, LLC, entered into a new
credit facility, which, among other things, financed a portion
of the Horizon acquisition and provided working capital for us
and our subsidiaries. Our current amended and restated credit
facility consists of a $110.0 million revolving credit
facility, of which up to a maximum of $60.0 million may be
utilized for letters of credit, and a $175.0 million term
loan facility. The revolving credit facility has a five-year
term and is due on October 1, 2009. The term loan facility
has a six-year term and is due on October 1, 2010. As of
March 31, 2005, we had $174.6 million outstanding
under our term loan facility and $49.9 million of
outstanding and undrawn letters of credit under our revolving
credit facility. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility
are subject to our total leverage ratio and bear interest, at
our option, at either LIBOR (adjusted for statutory reserves)
plus a margin ranging from 2.00% to 2.50% per annum or the
alternate base rate plus a margin ranging from 1.00% to
1.50% per annum. Borrowings under the term loan bear
interest, at our option, at either LIBOR (adjusted for statutory
reserves) plus 2.75% per annum or the alternate base rate
plus 1.75% per annum. As discussed below, we are currently
in the process of amending this credit facility to increase the
amount of the term loan facility by $35.0 million and the
amount of the sublimit for letters of credit by
$15.0 million.
Borrowings under our credit facility are secured by
substantially all of our assets and the assets of all of our
subsidiaries, as well as by a pledge of 100% of the stock of our
subsidiaries. In addition, we and each of our other non-borrower
subsidiaries guarantee all of the indebtedness under the credit
facility.
Our current credit facility requires certain mandatory
prepayments upon the receipt of the proceeds from certain asset
sales, casualty events, debt or equity offerings, including this
offering, and in the event that we have excess cash flow as
determined in accordance with the credit facility. Our current
credit facility requires 50% of the proceeds of this offering
(net of any customary fees, underwriting discounts, commissions
and other costs and expenses) to be applied as a prepayment of
the term loan facility, with such prepayment to be applied,
first, to the next scheduled amortization payment and, second,
to the remaining amortization payments on a pro rata basis.
Our current credit facility contains customary affirmative and
negative covenants for senior credit facilities of this type,
including, but not limited to, limitations on the incurrence of
indebtedness, asset dispositions, acquisitions, investments,
dividends and other restricted payments, liens and transactions
with affiliates. Our credit facility also currently contains the
following financial covenants:
|
|
4 |
a maximum leverage ratio, set at 2.75 to 1.00 from the closing
date of the credit facility through December 31, 2005 and
decreasing to 2.50 to 1.00 for the 2006 fiscal year, and 2.25 to
1.00 from January 1, 2007 through the final maturity date
of the credit facility; |
|
4 |
a minimum interest coverage ratio set at 4.00 to 1.00 for each
of the four consecutive quarters then last ended; |
|
4 |
a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, set at 1.00 to 1.00 from
the closing date of the credit facility through March 31,
2005, and adjusted as follows: 0.75 to 1.00 from April 1,
2005 through September 30, 2005, 0.90 to 1.00 from
October 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, 1.00 to
1.00 for the 2006 fiscal year and 1.25 to 1.00 from
January 1, 2007 through the final maturity date of the
credit facility; and |
123
Description of indebtedness
|
|
4 |
a limit on capital expenditures from the closing date of the
credit facility through December 31, 2005 of
$100.0 million, for the 2006 fiscal year of
$70.0 million, for the 2007 fiscal year of
$70.0 million, for the 2008 fiscal year of
$60.0 million, for the 2009 fiscal year of
$60.0 million and from January 1, 2010 through the
final maturity date of the credit facility of $60.0 million. |
Although we have not reached a covenant test period we believe
that ICG, LLC maintained the leverage and interest coverage
ratios specified in, and were in compliance with, the credit
facility as of March 31, 2005. We expect that some of our
financial covenant requirements will be modified in connection
with the amendment to the credit agreement.
Our current credit facility contains customary events of
default, including, but not limited to, failure to pay principal
or interest, breach of covenants or representations and
warranties, cross-default to other indebtedness, judgment
default and insolvency. If an event of default occurs under the
credit facility, the lenders under the credit facility will be
entitled to take various actions, including demanding payment
for all amounts outstanding thereunder and foreclosing on any
collateral.
In connection with the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions, we will
be amending our credit facility. We expect this amendment to be
completed by the end of June 2005. It is currently contemplated
that this amendment will include the following changes to our
credit facility:
|
|
4 |
the consent by our lenders under the credit facility to the
consummation of the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions and to the
corporate reorganization of ICG and certain of its subsidiaries; |
|
4 |
increase the amount of our term loan facility by an additional
$35.0 million bringing the total outstanding amount of this
term loan facility to $210.0 million; |
|
4 |
increase the sublimit of our revolving credit facility that is
available for the issuance of letters of credit from
$60.0 million to $75.0 million; |
|
4 |
permit us to make certain restricted payments, including
dividends, upon the completion of this offering in an amount to
be determined; |
|
4 |
modify the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio; |
|
4 |
modify the limit on capital expenditures; and |
|
4 |
allow us to increase the amount of our revolving credit facility
at a later date up to a maximum amount to be negotiated, subject
to lender approval at the time of the requested increase. |
124
Description of capital stock
The following is a description of the material terms of our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws as
each is in effect as of the date of this prospectus. We refer
you to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
bylaws, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
COMMON STOCK
As of March 31, 2005, our authorized capital stock
consisted of 2,000,000,000 shares of common stock, par
value $0.01 per share, of
which shares
were issued and outstanding immediately prior to this offering,
and 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.01 per share, of which no shares were issued and
outstanding immediately prior to this offering. Shares of our
common stock were held of record
by stockholders.
Immediately following the completion of this offering, we will
have shares
of our common stock, and no shares of our preferred stock,
outstanding.
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on
all matters submitted to be voted upon by the stockholders. The
holders of our common stock do not have cumulative voting rights
in the election of directors.
Subject to any superior rights of any holders of preferred stock
or any class or series of stock having a preference over the
common stock with respect to payment of dividends, holders of
our common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be
declared and paid from time to time by our board of directors
out of legally available funds. Our current credit facility
imposes restrictions on our ability to declare dividends with
respect to our common stock. For additional information, see
Dividend policy below.
In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the
holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably the
assets available for distribution to the stockholders after
payment of liabilities and any amounts due to the holders of
preferred stock.
The holders of our common stock have no preemptive rights and no
rights to convert or exchange their common stock into any other
securities. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions
applicable to our common stock. All outstanding shares of our
common stock, including the common stock offered in this
offering, are and will be fully paid and non-assessable.
PREFERRED STOCK
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes
our board of directors to, without stockholder approval, issue
up to 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more
series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and
restrictions granted to or imposed upon the preferred stock,
including voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights,
terms of redemption, liquidation preference, sinking fund terms,
subscription rights and the number of shares constituting any
series or the designation of a series.
Our board of directors can issue preferred stock with voting and
conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting power
of the holders of common stock, without stockholder approval. No
shares of preferred stock are currently outstanding and we have
no present plan to issue any shares of preferred stock.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We may retain any future earnings to support the development and
expansion of our business or make additional payments under our
credit facility and, as a result, we may not pay cash dividends
in the
125
Description of capital stock
foreseeable future. Our payment of any future dividends will be
at the discretion of our board of directors after taking into
account various factors, including our financial condition,
operating results, cash needs, growth plans and the terms of any
credit agreements that we may be a party to at the time. Our
credit facility limits us from paying any cash dividends or
other payments or distributions with respect to our capital
stock in excess of certain limitations. In addition, the terms
of any future credit agreement may contain similar restrictions
on our ability to pay dividends or making any distributions or
payments with respect to our capital stock.
REGISTRATION RIGHTS
We have granted our founding stockholders demand and
piggyback registration rights relating to their
shares of common stock pursuant to a registration rights
agreement. The former Anker and CoalQuest holders will receive
piggyback registration rights with respect to the
shares of ICG common stock they are receiving in the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions pursuant to a registration rights
agreement to be entered into at the closing of the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions. These rights are summarized below.
After the completion of this offering, holders
of shares
of common stock, or their permitted transferees, will be
entitled to unlimited piggyback registration rights.
These rights will entitle the holders to notice of a
registration prior to the filing of a registration statement and
to include, at our expense, their shares of common stock in any
of our registrations of our common stock (other than
registrations we file on Form S-4 or S-8, or any successor
forms thereto, or filed solely in connection with an offering
made solely to our existing stockholders or employees). We and
our underwriters can reduce the number of shares of common stock
requested to be included by holders of piggyback
registration rights in view of market conditions.
In addition, WLR or any other founding stockholder or
stockholders representing 30% of all registrable securities or
their permitted transferees are entitled to demand
rights to register all or a portion of their registrable
securities under the Securities Act if the reasonably
anticipated aggregate price to the public of these shares (net
of underwriting discounts and commission) would exceed
$75.0 million. We are also obligated to undertake three
demand registrations by WLR, one demand registration by each
other individual founding stockholder and two additional demand
registrations by a group of the founding stockholders
representing 30% of the registrable securities. If at any time
we are eligible to register our securities on a Form S-3
under the Securities Act, holders can specify that the requested
registration be a shelf registration for an offering
on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 of
the Securities Act.
If our stockholders with registration rights cause a large
number of securities to be registered and sold in the public
market, those sales could cause the market price of our common
stock to decline. If we initiate a registration and include
registrable securities as a result of the exercise of
registration rights, the inclusion of registrable securities
could adversely affect our ability to raise capital.
ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECTS OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF OUR AMENDED
AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
contain several provisions that may make it more difficult to
acquire us by means of a tender offer, open market purchase,
proxy fight or otherwise.
These provisions in our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws are designed to encourage persons
seeking to acquire control of us to negotiate with our board. We
believe that, as a general rule, our interests and the interests
of our stockholders would be served best if any change in
control results from negotiations with our board based upon
careful consideration of the proposed
126
Description of capital stock
terms, such as the price to be paid to stockholders, the form of
consideration to be paid and the anticipated tax effects of the
transaction.
These anti-takeover provisions in our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and bylaws could, however, have the
effect of discouraging a prospective acquiror from making a
tender offer for our shares or otherwise attempting to obtain
control of us. To the extent that these provisions discourage
takeover attempts, they could deprive stockholders of
opportunities to realize takeover premiums for their shares.
Moreover, these provisions could discourage accumulations of
large blocks of common stock, thus depriving stockholders of any
advantages which large accumulations of stock might provide.
Set forth below is a summary of the relevant provisions of our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws and
certain applicable sections of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware. This summary does not purport to be
complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by
reference to, all of the provisions of our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and sections of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
Delaware anti-takeover statute
We are governed by Section 203 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware. Section 203, subject to
certain exceptions, prohibits a Delaware corporation from
engaging in any business combination with any interested
stockholder for a period of three years following the time that
such stockholder became an interested stockholder, unless:
|
|
4 |
prior to such time, the board of directors of the corporation
approved either the business combination or the transaction
which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested
stockholder; |
|
4 |
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the
corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced,
excluding specified shares; or |
|
4 |
at or subsequent to such time, the business combination is
approved by the board of directors and authorized at an annual
or special meeting of stockholders, and not by written consent,
by the affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
interested stockholder. |
The application of Section 203 may limit the ability of
stockholders to approve a transaction that they may deem to be
in their best interests.
In general, Section 203 defines business
combination to include:
|
|
4 |
any merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the
interested stockholder; |
|
4 |
any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other
disposition of 10% or more of the assets of the corporation to
or with the interested stockholder; |
|
4 |
subject to certain exceptions, any transaction which results in
the issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the
corporation to the interested stockholder; |
|
4 |
any transaction involving the corporation which has the effect
of increasing the proportionate share of the stock of any class
or series of the corporation beneficially owned by the
interested stockholder; or |
|
4 |
the receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any
loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits
provided by or through the corporation. |
127
Description of capital stock
In general, Section 203 defines an interested
stockholder as any person that is:
|
|
4 |
the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the
corporation; |
|
4 |
an affiliate or associate of the corporation and was the owner
of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the
corporation at any time within three years immediately prior to
the relevant date; and |
|
4 |
the affiliates and associates of the above. |
Under specific circumstances, Section 203 makes it more
difficult for an interested stockholder to effect
various business combinations with a corporation for a
three-year period, although the stockholders may, by adopting an
amendment to the corporations certificate of incorporation
or bylaws, elect not to be governed by this section, effective
twelve months after adoption.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
do not exclude us from the restrictions imposed under
Section 203. We anticipate that the provisions of
Section 203 may encourage companies interested in acquiring
us to negotiate in advance with our board of directors since the
stockholder approval requirement would be avoided if a majority
of the directors then in office approve either the business
combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder.
Stockholder action; special meetings
Our certificate of incorporation provides that stockholder
action can be taken only at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders and cannot be taken by written consent in lieu of a
meeting. Our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws provide
that, except as otherwise required by law, special meetings of
the stockholders can only be called by the chairman of our
board, our chief executive officer, our president or our
secretary at the request of a majority of the number of
directors that we would have if there were no vacancies on our
board. Stockholders are not permitted to call a special meeting
or to require our board to call a special meeting.
Stockholder proposals
At an annual meeting of stockholders, only business that is
properly brought before the meeting will be conducted or
considered. To be properly brought before an annual meeting of
stockholders, business must be specified in the notice of the
meeting (or any supplement to that notice), brought before the
meeting by the presiding officer or by or at the direction of
the majority of the total number of directors that our board
would have if there were no vacancies, or properly requested by
a stockholder to be brought before the meeting.
For business to be properly requested by a stockholder to be
brought before an annual meeting, the stockholder must:
|
|
4 |
be a stockholder of record at the time of the giving of the
notice for the meeting; |
|
4 |
be entitled to vote at the meeting; and |
|
4 |
have given timely written notice of the business to our
secretary. |
To be timely, a stockholders notice must be delivered to
or mailed and received at our principal executive offices not
less than 60, nor more than 90, calendar days prior to the first
anniversary date on which we first mailed our proxy materials
for the preceding years annual meeting of stockholders;
provided, however, that if there was no annual meeting in the
preceding year or the date of the annual meeting is advanced
more than 30 calendar days prior to, or delayed by more
than 30 calendar days after the anniversary of the preceding
years annual meeting, notice by the stockholder to be
timely
128
Description of capital stock
must be so delivered not later than the close of business on the
later of the 90th calendar day prior to such annual meeting or
the 10th calendar day following the day on which public
disclosure of the date of such meeting is first made. A
stockholders notice must set forth, as to each matter the
stockholder proposes to bring before the meeting:
|
|
4 |
a description in reasonable detail of the business proposed to
be brought before the meeting and the reasons for conducting
such business at the meeting; |
|
4 |
the name and address of the stockholder proposing such business
and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the
proposal is made; |
|
4 |
the class and series and number of shares that are owned of
record and beneficially by the stockholder proposing the
business and by the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf
the proposal is made; |
|
4 |
a description of all arrangements or understandings among the
stockholder, the beneficial owner on whose behalf the proposal
is made, if any, and any other person or persons (including
their names) in connection with the proposal of such business by
the stockholders and any material interest of the stockholder in
such business; |
|
4 |
whether such stockholder or beneficial owner intends to deliver
a proxy statement and forms of proxy to holders of at least the
percentage of shares of our voting stock required to approve
such proposal; and |
|
4 |
a representation that the stockholder intends to appear in
person or by proxy at the annual meeting to bring such business
before the meeting. |
Similarly, at a special meeting of stockholders, only such
business as is properly brought before the meeting will be
conducted or considered. To be properly brought before a special
meeting, business must be specified in the notice of the meeting
(or any supplement to that notice) given by or at the direction
of the chairman of our board, our chief executive officer, our
president or our secretary at the request of a majority of the
number of directors that we would have if there were no
vacancies on our board or, otherwise brought before the meeting
by the presiding officer or by or at the direction of the
majority of the total number of directors that our board would
have if there were no vacancies.
Nomination of candidates for election to our board
Under our bylaws, only persons that are properly nominated will
be eligible for election to be members of our board. To be
properly nominated, a director candidate must be nominated at an
annual meeting of the stockholders by or at the direction of our
board or committee thereof or properly nominated by a
stockholder. To be properly nominated by a stockholder, such
stockholder must have delivered a proxy statement and form of
proxy to the holders of at least the percentage of shares of our
voting stock required to approve such nomination and included in
such materials a timely and proper notice in proper written form
to our secretary.
To be timely, a stockholders notice must be delivered to
or mailed and received at our principal executive offices not
less than 60 nor more than 90 calendar days prior to the
first anniversary of the date on which we first mailed our proxy
materials for the preceding years annual meeting of
stockholders. If, however, there was no annual meeting in the
preceding year or the date of the annual meeting is advanced
more than 30 calendar days prior to, or delayed by more
than 30 calendar days after the anniversary of the
preceding years annual meeting, notice by the stockholder
to be timely must be so delivered not later than the later of
the 90th calendar day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth
calendar day following the day on which public announcement of
the date of such meeting is first made.
129
Description of capital stock
To be in proper written form, such stockholders notice
must include:
|
|
4 |
the name and address of the stockholder giving the notice and of
the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is
made; |
|
4 |
a representation that the stockholder giving the notice is a
holder of record of shares of our voting stock entitled to vote
at such annual meeting and intends to appear in person or by
proxy at the annual meeting to nominate the person or persons
specified in the notice; |
|
4 |
the class and series and number of shares of stock owned
beneficially and of record by the stockholder giving the notice
and by the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the
nomination in made; |
|
4 |
a description of all arrangements or understandings between or
among any of: |
|
|
|
|
4 |
the stockholder giving the notice; |
|
|
4 |
the beneficial owner on whose behalf the notice is given; |
|
|
4 |
each nominee; and |
|
|
4 |
any other person or persons (naming such person or persons)
pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made
by the stockholder giving the notice; |
|
|
4 |
the name, age, business address, residence address and
occupation of the nominee proposed by the stockholder; |
|
4 |
such other information regarding each nominee proposed by the
stockholder giving the notice as would be required to be
included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules
of the SEC had the nominee been nominated, or intended to be
nominated, by our board; |
|
4 |
the signed consent of each nominee to serve as a director on our
board if so elected; and |
|
4 |
whether such stockholder or beneficial owner intends to deliver
a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders of at least the
percentage of shares of our voting stock required to elect such
nominee or nominees. In addition, a stockholder must also comply
with all applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder with respect to matters
relating to nomination of candidates for directors. |
Amendment to our bylaws
Except for certain provisions indicated above, our bylaws may be
amended, altered or repealed by the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of our voting stock or by the affirmative
vote of a majority of our board. Certain provisions that require
the affirmative vote of the holders of 80% of our voting stock
may make it more difficult to change our bylaws for the purpose
of gaining control over us.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
We have appointed Registrar and Transfer Company as the transfer
agent and registrar for our common stock.
LISTING
We will apply to have our common stock listed on The New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol ICO.
130
Shares eligible for future sale
Prior to this offering, there was no public market for our
common stock. Future sales of substantial amounts of our common
stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales
could occur, could adversely affect the price of our common
stock.
Based on the number of shares outstanding as
of ,
2005, we will have
approximately shares
of our common stock outstanding after the completion of this
offering and after giving effect to the corporate reorganization
and the Anker and CoalQuest acquisitions
(approximately shares
if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full). Of those shares,
the shares
of common stock sold in this offering
( shares
if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full) and
the shares
issued to the holders of ICG, Inc.s common stock in
connection with the corporate reorganization will be freely
tradable without restriction or further registration under the
Securities Act, except that any shares held by our
affiliates, as that term is defined under
Rule 144 of the Securities Act, may be sold only in
compliance with the limitations described below. The remaining
outstanding shares of common stock will be deemed
restricted securities as that term is defined under
Rule 144. Restricted securities may not be resold except
pursuant to an effective registration statement or an applicable
exemption from registration, including an exemption under
Rule 144 or 144(k) under the Securities Act, which are
summarized below.
RULE 144
In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, an
affiliate of ours who beneficially owns shares of our common
stock that are not restricted securities, or a person who
beneficially owns for more than one year shares of our common
stock that are restricted securities, may generally sell, within
any three-month period, a number of shares that does not exceed
the greater of:
|
|
4 |
1% of the then-outstanding shares of common stock or
approximately shares
assuming no exercise by the underwriters of their option to
purchase additional shares; and |
|
4 |
the average weekly reported volume of trading in the common
stock on The New York Stock Exchange during the four calendar
weeks preceding the date on which notice of sale is filed,
subject to restrictions. |
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to requirements with
respect to manner of sale, notice and the availability of
current public information about us. Generally, a person who was
not our affiliate at any time during the three months before the
sale, and who has beneficially owned shares of our common stock
that are restricted securities for at least two years, may sell
those shares without regard to the volume limitations, manner of
sale provisions, notice requirements or the requirements with
respect to availability of current public information about us.
Rule 144 does not supersede the contractual obligations of
our security holders set forth in the lock-up agreements
described above.
RULE 144(K)
In addition, a person who is not deemed to have been an
affiliate of ours at any time during the 90 days preceding
a sale and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be
sold for at least two years, would be entitled to sell those
shares under Rule 144(k) without regard to the manner of
sale, public information, volume limitation or notice
requirements of Rule 144. To the extent that our affiliates
sell their shares, other than pursuant to Rule 144 or a
registration statement, the purchasers holding period for
the purpose of effecting a sale under Rule 144 commences on
the date of transfer from the affiliate.
131
Shares eligible for future sale
RULE 701
Generally, an employee, officer, director or consultant who
purchased shares of our common stock before the effective date
of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a
part, or who holds options as of that date, pursuant to a
written compensatory plan or contract, may rely on the resale
provisions of Rule 701 under the Securities Act. Under
Rule 701, these persons who are not our affiliates may
generally sell their eligible securities, commencing
90 days after the effective date of the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part, without having to
comply with the public information, holding period, volume
limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144. These persons
who are our affiliates may generally sell their eligible
securities under Rule 701, commencing 90 days after
the effective date of the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part, without having to comply with
Rule 144s one-year holding period restriction.
Neither Rule 144 nor Rule 701 supersedes the
contractual obligations of our security holders set forth in the
lock-up agreements described above.
SALE OF RESTRICTED SHARES
The shares
of our common stock that were outstanding
on ,
2005 will become eligible for sale, pursuant to Rule 144 or
Rule 701, without registration approximately as follows:
|
|
4 |
shares
of common stock will be immediately eligible for sale in the
public market without restriction; |
|
4 |
shares
of common stock will be eligible for sale in the public market
under Rule 144 or Rule 701, beginning 90 days
after the effective date of the registration statement of which
this prospectus is a part, subject to the volume, manner of sale
and other limitations under those rules; and |
|
4 |
the
remaining shares
of common stock will become eligible under Rule 144 for
sale in the public market from time to time after the effective
date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a
part upon expiration of their respective holding periods. |
The above does not take into consideration the effect of the
lock-up agreements described above.
LOCK-UP AGREEMENTS
The holders of
approximately shares
of outstanding common stock as of the closing of this offering
and the holders
of shares
of common stock underlying options as of the closing of this
offering, including all of our executive officers and directors,
have entered into lock-up agreements pursuant to which they have
generally agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to offer or
sell any shares of common stock or securities convertible into
or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of common stock for a
period of at least 180 days from the date of this
prospectus without the prior written consent of UBS Securities
LLC. See UnderwritingNo sale of similar
securities.
STOCK OPTIONS
Pursuant to the stock option plan that we intend to adopt prior
to the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part, we expect to grant options to members of
senior management to purchase an aggregate
of shares
of our common stock. Of the outstanding shares of common stock
to be granted as options,
approximately %
of shares
will, subject to the continued employment of such members of
senior management, vest and become exercisable on
each beginning and
ending
on .
132
Shares eligible for future sale
As soon as practicable following this offering, we intend to
file one or more registration statements on Form S-8 under
the Securities Act to register all shares of common stock
subject to outstanding stock options. After expiration of the
applicable contractual resale restrictions, shares covered by
these registration statements will be eligible for sale in the
public markets, other than shares owned by our affiliates, which
may be sold in the public market if they are registered or
qualify for an exemption from registration under Rule 144.
133
Certain U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences to
non-U.S. holders
The following is a summary of certain material United States
federal income and estate tax consequences of the purchase,
ownership and disposition of our common stock as of the date
hereof. Except where noted, this summary deals only with common
stock that is held as a capital asset by a non-U.S. holder.
A non-U.S. holder means a person (other than a
partnership) that is not for United States federal income tax
purposes any of the following:
|
|
4 |
an individual citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
4 |
a corporation (or any other entity treated as a corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes) created or organized
in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or
the District of Columbia; |
|
4 |
an estate the income of which is subject to United States
federal income taxation regardless of its source; or |
|
4 |
a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of
a court within the United States and one or more United States
persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions
of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under
applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a
United States person. |
This summary is based upon provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and
regulations, rulings and judicial decisions as of the date
hereof. Those authorities may be changed, perhaps retroactively,
so as to result in United States federal income and estate tax
consequences different from those summarized below. This summary
does not address all aspects of United States federal income and
estate taxes and does not deal with foreign, state, local or
other tax considerations that may be relevant to
non-U.S. holders in light of their personal circumstances.
In addition, it does not represent a detailed description of the
United States federal income and estate tax consequences
applicable to you if you are subject to special treatment under
the United States federal income tax laws (including if you are
a United States expatriate, controlled foreign
corporation, passive foreign investment
company, corporation that accumulates earnings to avoid
United States federal income tax or an investor in a
pass-through entity). A change in law may alter significantly
the tax considerations that we describe in this summary.
If a partnership holds our common stock, the tax treatment of a
partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and
the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a
partnership holding our common stock, you should consult your
tax advisors.
If you are considering the purchase of our common stock, we
recommend that you consult your own tax advisors concerning the
particular United States federal income and estate tax
consequences to you of the ownership of the common stock, as
well as the consequences to you arising under the laws of any
other taxing jurisdiction.
DIVIDENDS
Cash distributions on our common stock will constitute dividends
for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid
from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as
determined under U.S. federal income tax principals.
Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will
constitute a return of capital that is applied against and
reduces the non-U.S. holders adjusted tax basis in our
134
Certain U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences
to non-U.S. holders
common stock. Any remaining excess will be treated as gain
realized on the sale or other disposition of the common stock
and will be treated as described under Gain on
Disposition of Common Stock below. Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder of our common stock generally will be
subject to withholding of United States federal income tax at a
30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable
income tax treaty. However, dividends that are effectively
connected with the conduct of a trade or business by the
non-U.S. holder within the United States are not subject to
the withholding tax, provided certain certification and
disclosure requirements are satisfied. Instead, such dividends
are generally subject to United States federal income tax on a
net income basis in the same manner as if the
non-U.S. holder were a United States person as defined
under the Code. Any such effectively connected dividends
received by a foreign corporation may be subject to an
additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate or such
lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax
treaty.
A non-U.S. holder of our common stock who wishes to claim
the benefit of an applicable treaty rate and avoid backup
withholding, as discussed below, for dividends will be required
to (a) complete Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN
(or other applicable form) and certify under penalty of perjury
that such holder is not a United States person as defined under
the Code or (b) if our common stock is held through certain
foreign intermediaries, satisfy the relevant certification
requirements of applicable United States Treasury regulations.
Special certification and other requirements apply to certain
non-U.S. holders that are entities rather than individuals.
A non-U.S. holder of our common stock eligible for a
reduced rate of United States withholding tax pursuant to an
income tax treaty may obtain a refund of any excess amounts
withheld by filing an appropriate claim for refund with the
Internal Revenue Service.
GAIN ON DISPOSITION OF COMMON STOCK
Any gain realized on the disposition of our common stock
generally will not be subject to United States federal income
tax unless:
|
|
4 |
the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business of
the non-U.S. holder in the United States, and, if required
by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a United
States permanent establishment of the non-U.S. holder; |
|
4 |
the non-U.S. holder is an individual who is present in the
United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of
that disposition, and certain other conditions are met; or |
|
4 |
we are or have been a United States real property holding
corporation for United States federal income tax purposes. |
A non-corporate non-U.S. holder described in the first
bullet point immediately above will be subject to tax on the net
gain derived from the sale under regular graduated United States
federal income tax rates. An individual non-U.S. holder
described in the second bullet point immediately above will be
subject to a flat 30% tax on the gain derived from the sale,
which may be offset by United States source capital losses, even
though the individual is not considered a resident of the United
States. If a non-U.S. holder that is a foreign corporation
falls under the first bullet point immediately above, it will be
subject to tax on its net gain in the same manner as if it were
a United States person as defined under the Code and, in
addition, may be subject to the branch profits tax equal to 30%
of its effectively connected earnings and profits or at such
lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax
treaty.
We believe that we are currently a United States real
property holding corporation for United States federal
income tax purposes. So long as our common stock continues to be
regularly traded on an established securities market, only a
non-U.S. holder who holds or held (at any time during the
shorter
135
Certain U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences
to non-U.S. holders
of the five year period preceding the date of disposition or the
holders holding period) more than 5% of our common stock
will generally be subject to United States federal income tax on
the disposition of our common stock. If a non-U.S. holder
owned directly or indirectly more than 5% of our common stock at
any time during the applicable period, then any gain recognized
by such 5% non-U.S. holder on the sale or other disposition
of our common stock would be treated as effectively connected
with a U.S. trade or business and would be subject to
U.S. federal income tax at regular graduated
U.S. federal income tax rates and in much the same manner
as applicable to U.S. persons. Furthermore, if our common
stock were not considered to be regularly traded on an
established securities market, then any gain recognized by
a non-U.S. holder on the sale or other disposition of our
common stock would be treated as effectively connected with a
U.S. trade or business and would be subject to
U.S. federal income tax at regular graduated
U.S. federal income tax rates and in much the same manner
as applicable to U.S. persons. In such a case, the
non-U.S. holder could also be subject to certain
withholding taxes imposed on the gross proceeds realized with
respect to the sale or other disposition of our common stock.
FEDERAL ESTATE TAX
Common stock owned or treated as owned by an individual
non-U.S. holder at the time of death will be included in
such holders gross estate for United States federal estate
tax purposes, unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides
otherwise.
INFORMATION REPORTING AND BACKUP WITHHOLDING
We must report annually to the Internal Revenue Service and to
each non-U.S. holder the amount of dividends paid to such
holder and the tax withheld with respect to such dividends,
regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the
information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may
also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in
which the non-U.S. holder resides under the provisions of
an applicable income tax treaty.
A non-U.S. holder will be subject to backup withholding for
dividends paid to such holder unless such holder certifies under
penalty of perjury that it is a non-U.S. holder, and the
payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that such
holder is a United States person as defined under the Code, or
such holder otherwise establishes an exemption.
Information reporting and, depending on the circumstances,
backup withholding will apply to the proceeds of a sale or other
disposition (including a redemption) of our common stock within
the United States or conducted through certain United
States-related financial intermediaries, unless the beneficial
owner certifies under penalty of perjury that it is a
non-U.S. holder (and the payor does not have actual
knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial owner is a
United States person as defined under the Code) or such owner
otherwise establishes an exemption.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a
refund or a credit against a non-U.S. holders United
States federal income tax liability provided the required
information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
136
Underwriting
We are offering the shares of our common stock described in this
prospectus through the underwriters named below. UBS Securities
LLC and Lehman Brothers Inc. are the representatives of the
underwriters. UBS Securities LLC and Lehman Brothers Inc. are
the joint book-running managers of this offering. We will enter
into an underwriting agreement with the representatives. Subject
to the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement, each
underwriter will severally agree to purchase the number of
shares of common stock listed next to its name in the following
table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters |
|
Number of shares | |
| |
UBS Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Lehman Brothers Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters must
buy all of the shares if they buy any of them. However, the
underwriters will not be required to take or pay for the shares
covered by the underwriters over-allotment option
described below.
Our common stock is offered subject to a number of conditions,
including:
|
|
4 |
receipt and acceptance of our common stock by the
underwriters; and |
|
4 |
the underwriters right to reject orders in whole or in
part. |
In connection with this offering, certain of the underwriters or
securities dealers may distribute prospectuses electronically.
Sales of the shares made outside the United States may be made
by affiliates of the underwriters.
OVER-ALLOTMENT OPTION
We have granted the underwriters an option to buy up to an
aggregate of additional shares of our common stock. The
underwriters may exercise this option solely for the purpose of
covering over-allotments, if any, made in connection with this
offering. The underwriters have 30 days from the date of
this prospectus to exercise this option. If the underwriters
exercise this option in whole or in part, they will each
purchase additional shares from us approximately in proportion
to the amounts specified in the table above.
COMMISSIONS AND DISCOUNTS
Shares sold by the underwriters to the public will initially be
offered at the public offering price set forth on the cover of
this prospectus. Any shares sold by the underwriters to
securities dealers may be sold at a discount of up to
$ per
share from the public offering price. Any of these securities
dealers may resell any shares purchased from the underwriters to
other brokers or dealers at a discount of up to
$ per
share from the public offering price. If all the shares are not
sold at the public offering price, the representatives may
change the offering price and the other selling terms. Sales of
shares outside of the United States may be made by affiliates of
the underwriters. Upon execution of the underwriting agreement,
the underwriters will be obligated to purchase the shares at the
prices and upon the terms stated therein and, as a result, will
thereafter bear any risk associated with changing the offering
price to the public or other selling terms. The underwriters
have informed
137
Underwriting
us that they do not expect discretionary sales to exceed 5% of
the shares of common stock to be offered.
The following table shows the per share and total underwriting
discounts and commissions we will pay to the underwriters. These
amounts are shown assuming both no exercised and full exercise
of the underwriters option to purchase up to an
additional shares
from us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid by us | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
No exercise | |
|
Full exercise | |
|
No exercise | |
|
Full exercise | |
| |
Per share
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
We estimate that the total expenses of this offering payable by
us, not including underwriting discounts and commissions, will
be approximately
$ million.
NO SALES OF SIMILAR SECURITIES
We and each of our directors, executive officers and certain of
our current stockholders have entered into lock-up agreements
with the underwriters. Under these lock-up agreements we and
each of these persons may not, without the prior written consent
of UBS Securities LLC, sell, offer to sell, contract or agree to
sell, hypothecate, hedge, pledge, grant any option to purchase
or otherwise dispose of or agree to dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any of our common stock or any securities
convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our common
stock, or warrants or other rights to purchase our common stock.
These restrictions will be in effect for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus. These lock-up
agreements are subject to such stockholders rights to
transfer their shares of common stock as a bona fide gift or to
a trust for the benefit of an immediate family member or to an
affiliate, provided that such done or transferee agrees in
writing to be bound by the terms of the lock- up agreement. At
any time and without public notice, UBS Securities LLC may, in
its sole discretion release some or all of the affected
securities from these lock-up agreements.
INDEMNIFICATION AND CONTRIBUTION
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters and their
controlling persons against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act. If we are unable to
provide this indemnification, we will contribute to payments the
underwriters and their controlling persons may be required to
make in respect of those liabilities.
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING
We will apply to have our common stock listed on The New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol ICO.
PRICE STABILIZATION, SHORT POSITIONS
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in
activities that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the
price of our common stock, including:
|
|
4 |
stabilizing transactions; |
|
4 |
short sales; |
|
4 |
purchases to cover positions created by short sales; |
|
4 |
imposition of penalty bids; and |
|
4 |
syndicate covering transactions. |
138
Underwriting
Stabilizing transactions consist of bids or purchases made for
the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market
price of our common stock while this offering is in progress.
These transactions may also include making short sales of our
common stock, which involve the sale by the underwriters of a
greater number of shares of common stock than they are required
to purchase in this offering and purchasing shares of common
stock on the open market to cover positions created by short
sales. Short sales may be covered short sales, which
are short positions in an amount not greater than the
underwriters over-allotment option referred to above, or
may be naked short sales, which are short positions
in excess of that amount.
The underwriters may close out any covered short position either
by exercising their over-allotment option, in whole or in part,
or by purchasing shares in the open market. In making this
determination, the underwriters will consider, among other
things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open
market as compared to the price at which they may purchase
shares through the over-allotment option.
Naked short sales are in excess of the over-allotment option.
The underwriters must close out any naked short position by
purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is
more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that
there may be downward pressure on the price of the common stock
in the open market that could adversely affect investors who
purchased in this offering.
The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. This occurs when
a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of
the underwriting discount received by it because the
representatives have repurchased shares sold by or for the
account of that underwriter in stabilizing or short covering
transactions.
As a result of these activities, the price of our common stock
may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the
open market. If these activities are commenced, they may be
discontinued by the underwriters at any time. The underwriters
may carry out these transactions on The New York Stock Exchange,
in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.
DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock, although certain private sales of our shares of
common stock are quoted on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation
Service. Our common stock is not listed, traded or quoted on any
other securities exchange. The public offering price for the
shares of common stock being sold in this offering will be
determined by negotiation between us and the representative of
the underwriters. In addition to the recent prices of our common
stock as quoted on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service,
the principal factors to be considered in determining the public
offering price include:
|
|
4 |
the information set forth in this prospectus and otherwise
available to the representatives; |
|
4 |
our history and prospects and the history of, and the prospects
for, the industry in which we compete; |
|
4 |
our past and present financial performance and an assessment of
our management; |
|
4 |
our prospects for future earnings and the present state of our
development; |
|
4 |
the general condition of the securities markets at the time of
this offering; |
|
4 |
the recent market prices of, and the demand for, publicly traded
common stock of generally comparable companies; and |
|
4 |
other factors deemed relevant by the underwriters and us. |
139
Underwriting
The public offering price determined by negotiation between us
and the representative of the underwriters may differ from the
recent sales prices of our common stock as quoted on the Pink
Sheets Electronic Quotation Service.
AFFILIATIONS
Certain of the underwriters and their affiliates have in the
past provided and may provide from time to time certain
commercial banking, financial advisory, investment banking and
other services for us which they were and will be entitled to
receive separate fees. The underwriters and their affiliates may
from time to time in the future engage in transactions with us
and perform services for us in the ordinary course of their
business. In particular, we have granted UBS Securities LLC a
right of first refusal to act as joint book-running lead manager
and stabilization agent or lead placement agent, as the case may
be, in connection with any public offering of our common stock
prior to September 28, 2006, in each case subject to an
agreement containing customary fees and other terms and
conditions customary to UBS Securities LLC and mutually agreed
upon by us and UBS Securities LLC. UBS Securities LLC and its
affiliates also act as agent and are lenders under our senior
credit facility and have received and will continue to receive
certain fees for their services. We believe that the fees and
commissions payable in respect of participation in the credit
facilities are customary for borrowers with credit profiles
similar to ours, in a similar size financing as for borrowers in
our industry. In addition, UBS Securities LLC served as an
advisor to us in connection with the Anker and CoalQuest
acquisitions, for which it received customary fees for its
services. Lehman Brothers Inc. acted as the financial advisor to
the ICG special committee with respect to the Anker and
CoalQuest acquisitions and received customary fees in connection
with its services. Lehman Brothers Inc. also owns 4.3 million
shares of our common stock. The underwriters and their
affiliates may from time to time in the future engage in
transactions with us and perform services for us in the ordinary
course of their business.
140
Validity of the shares
The validity of the issuance of the shares of common stock to be
sold in this offering will be passed upon for us by Jones Day,
New York, New York. Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, New
York will act as counsel to the underwriters.
141
Experts
The combined financial statements of Horizon NR, LLC and certain
subsidiaries (Combined Companies) as of
September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and for the
period January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004, the year
ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002, and for the period January 1, 2002
to May 9, 2002, included in this prospectus and the related
financial statement schedule included elsewhere in the
registration statement have been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as
stated in their reports appearing in this prospectus and
elsewhere in the registration statement (which report on the
combined financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion
on the financial statements and includes explanatory paragraphs
referring to (1) fresh start reporting as of May 9,
2002, (2) allocations of certain assets and expense items
applicable to Horizon and subsidiaries, (3) the bankruptcy
filing of the Combined Companies and the fact the combined
financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to
the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts
or the amount and classification of liabilities that might
result should the Combined Companies be unable to continue as a
going concern, and (4) referring to the restatement of the
financial statement schedule) and are so included in reliance
upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as
experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of ICG, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and for period
May 13, 2004 to December 31, 2004, included in this
prospectus and the related financial statement schedule included
elsewhere the registration statement have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their reports appearing in this
prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement (which
reports express an unqualified opinion on the financial
statements and financial statement schedule and include an
explanatory paragraph referring to the restatement of the
financial statement schedule) and are included in reliance upon
the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts
in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Anker Coal Group, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and for the year
ended December 31, 2004, included in this prospectus have
been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report
appearing in this prospectus, and are included in reliance upon
the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of CoalQuest Development LLC as of
December 31, 2004 and for the year ended December 31,
2004, included in this prospectus have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing in this
prospectus, and are included in reliance upon the report of such
firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and
auditing.
Expertscoal reserves
The estimates of our proven and probable coal reserves referred
to in this prospectus, to the extent described in this
prospectus, have been prepared by us and reviewed by Marshall
Miller & Associates, Inc.
142
Where you can find additional information
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the
issuance of shares of our common stock being offered by this
prospectus. This prospectus, which forms a part of the
registration statement, does not contain all of the information
set forth in the registration statement. For further information
with respect to us and the shares of our common stock, reference
is made to the registration statement. We are not currently
subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act.
As a result of the offering of the shares of our common stock,
we will become subject to the informational requirements of the
Exchange Act, and, in accordance therewith, will file reports
and other information with the SEC. The registration statement,
such reports and other information can be inspected and copied
at the Public Reference Room of the SEC located at
Room 1024, Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Washington D.C. 20549. Copies of such materials, including
copies of all or any portion of the registration statement, can
be obtained from the Public Reference Room of the SEC at
prescribed rates. You can call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 to
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference
Room. These materials may also be accessed electronically by
means of the SECs home page on the Internet
(http://www.sec.gov).
143
Glossary of selected terms
Ash. Impurities consisting of iron, alumina and other
incombustible matter that are contained in coal. Since ash
increases the weight of coal, it adds to the cost of handling
and can affect the burning characteristics of coal.
Base load. The lowest level of power production needs
during a season or year.
Bituminous coal. A middle rank coal (between
sub-bituminous and anthracite) formed by additional pressure and
heat on lignite. The most common type of coal with moisture
content less than 20% by weight and heating value of 10,500 to
14,000 Btus per pound. It is dense and black and often has
well-defined bands of bright and dull material. It may be
referred to as soft coal.
British thermal unit, or Btu. A measure of
the thermal energy required to raise the temperature of one
pound of pure liquid water one degree Fahrenheit at the
temperature at which water has its greatest density
(39 degrees Fahrenheit). On average, coal contains about
22 million Btu per ton.
By-product. Useful substances made from the gases and
liquids left over when coal is changed into coke.
Central Appalachia. Coal producing area in eastern
Kentucky, Virginia and southern West Virginia.
Clean Air Act Amendments. A comprehensive set of
amendments to the federal law governing the nations air
quality. The Clean Air Act was extensively amended in 1970, 1977
and 1990 to address significant air pollution problems. The 1990
amendments broadened and strengthened the original law to
address specific problems such as acid deposition, urban smog,
hazardous air pollutants, and stratospheric ozone depletion.
Clean coal burning technologies. A number of innovative,
new technologies designed to use coal in a more efficient and
cost-effective manner while enhancing environmental protection.
Several promising technologies include fluidized-bed combustion,
integrated gasification combined cycle, limestone injection
multi-stage burner, enhanced flue gas desulfurization (or
scrubbing), coal liquefaction, and coal gasification.
Coal resources. Coal resources are coal bearing bodies
that have been sufficiently sampled and analyzed, but do not
qualify as a commercially viable coal reserve as prescribed by
SEC rules until a final comprehensive SEC prescribed evaluation
is performed.
Coal seam. A bed or stratum of coal. Usually applies to a
large deposit.
Coal washing. The process of separating undesirable
materials from coal based on differences in densities. Pyritic
sulfur, or noncarbonaceous material, is heavier and sinks in
water; coal is lighter and floats.
Coke. A hard, dry carbon substance produced by heating
coal to a very high temperature in the absence of air. Coke is
used in the manufacture of iron and steel. Its production
results in a number of useful byproducts.
Compliance coal. Coal which, when burned, emits
1.2 pounds or less of sulfur dioxide per million Btu, as
required by Phase II of the Clean Air Act Acid Rain program.
Continuous miner. A machine that simultaneously extracts
and loads coal. This is distinguished from a conventional, or
cyclic, unit, which must stop the extraction process for loading
to commence.
Continuous mining. Any coal mining process which tears
the coal from the face mechanically (see Face) and
loads continuously, thus eliminating the separate cycles of
cutting, drilling, shooting and
144
Glossary of selected terms
loading. This is to be distinguished from conventional mining,
an older process in which these operations are cyclical.
Conventional mining. A deep mining method that includes
inserting explosives in a coal seam, blasting the seam and
removing the coal onto a conveyor or shuttle car.
Deep mine. An underground coal mine.
Dragline. A large excavating machine used in the surface
mining process to remove overburden (see
Overburden). The dragline has a large bucket
suspended from the end of a huge boom, which may be
275 feet long or larger. The bucket is suspended by cables
and capable of scooping up vast amounts of overburden as it is
pulled across the excavation area. The dragline, which can
walk on huge pontoon-like feet, is one
of the largest land-based machines in the world.
Face. The exposed area of an underground coalbed from
which coal is extracted.
Fluidized bed combustion. A process with a high success
rate in removing sulfur from coal during combustion. Crushed
coal and limestone are suspended in the bottom of a boiler by an
upward stream of hot air. The coal is burned in this bubbling,
liquid-like (or fluidized) mixture. Rather than released as
emissions, sulfur from combustion gases combines with the
limestone to form a solid compound recovered with the ash.
Fossil fuel. Fuel such as coal, crude oil or natural gas,
formed from the fossil remains of organic material.
Gasification. Any of various processes by which coal is
turned into low, medium or high-Btu gas.
High Btu coal. Coal which has an average heat content of
12,500 Btus per pound or greater.
Highwall. The unexcavated face of exposed overburden and
coal in a surface mine or in a face or bank on the uphill side
of a contour mine excavation.
Highwall miner. A mining system consisting of a remotely
controlled continuous miner that extracts coal and conveys it by
auger, belt, or chain conveyors to the outside. The cut is
typically a rectangular, horizontal cut from a highwall bench,
reaching depths of several hundred feet or deeper.
Illinois Basin. Coal producing area in Illinois, Indiana
and western Kentucky.
Lignite. The lowest rank of coal with a high moisture
content of up to 45% by weight and heating value of 6,500 to
8,300 Btus per pound. It is brownish black and tends to
oxidize and disintegrate when exposed to air.
Longwall miner. A deep mining machine that uses a steel
plow or rotating drum, which is pulled mechanically
back-and-forth across a long face of coal. The loosened coal
falls onto a conveyed for removal from the mine.
Longwall mining. The most productive underground mining
method in the United States. One of three main underground coal
mining methods currently in use. Employs a steel plow, or
rotation drum, which is pulled mechanically back and forth
across a face of coal that is usually several hundred feet long.
The loosened coal falls onto a conveyor for removal from the
mine.
Low sulfur coal. Coal which, when burned, emits
1.6 pounds or less of sulfur dioxide per million Btu.
Mid sulfur coal. Coal which, when burned, emits between
1.6 and 4.5 pounds of sulfur dioxide per million Btu.
145
Glossary of selected terms
Metallurgical coal. The various grades of coal suitable
for carbonization to make coke for steel manufacture. Also known
as met coal, its quality depends on four important
criteria: volatility, which affects coke yield; the level of
impurities including sulfur and ash, which affects coke quality;
composition, which affects coke strength; and basic
characteristics, which affect coke oven safety. Met coal
typically has a particularly high Btu but low ash and sulfur
content.
Mountaintop mining. A method of surface mining practiced
in the Appalachian coal fields of the eastern United States.
Mountaintop mining allows the mine operator to completely remove
the layers of dirt and rock covering a coal seam, making the
entire deposit economical for extraction. Although valley
fillthe depositing of rock and dirt from the surface mine
into adjacent valleyshas recently become controversial, it
is a practice that is not unique to the mining industry.
Hundreds of valley fills were constructed throughout the country
during the building of the vital Interstate Highway System.
Mountaintop mining is essential to viability of the modern
Appalachian coal industry.
Nitrogen oxide (NOx). A gas formed in high temperature
environments such as coal combustion. It is a harmful pollutant
that contributes to acid rain.
Northern Appalachia. Coal producing area in Maryland,
Ohio, Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.
Overburden. Layers of earth and rock covering a coal
seam. In surface mining operations, overburden is removed prior
to coal extraction.
Pillar. An area of coal left to support the overlying
strata in a mine; sometimes left permanently to support surface
structures.
Powder River Basin. Coal producing area in northeastern
Wyoming and southeastern Montana. This is the largest known
source of coal reserves and the largest producing region in the
United States.
Preparation plant. Usually located on a mine site,
although one plant may serve several mines. A preparation plant
is a facility for crushing, sizing and washing coal to prepare
it for use by a particular customer. The washing process has the
added benefit of removing some of the coals sulfur content.
Probable reserves. Reserves for which quantity and grade
and/or quality are computed from information similar to that
used for proven reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling
and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less
adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than
that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity
between points of observation.
Proven reserves. Reserves for which: (a) quantity is
computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches,
workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from
the results of detailed sampling; and (b) the sites for
inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and
the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape,
depth and mineral content of reserves are well-established.
Reclamation. The process of restoring land and
environmental values to a mining site after the coal or ore is
extracted. Reclamation operations are usually underway where the
resources have already been taken from a mine, even as
production operations are taking place elsewhere at the site.
This process commonly includes recontouring or reshaping the
land to its approximate original appearance, restoring topsoil
and planting native grasses, trees and ground covers. Mining
reclamation is closely regulated by both state and federal law.
Recoverable reserve. The amount of coal that can be
recovered from the Demonstrated Reserve Base. The recovery
factor for underground mines is about 60.0%, and for surface
mines about 80.0% to
146
Glossary of selected terms
90.0%. Using these percentages, there are about 275 billion
tons of recoverable reserves in the United States.
Reserve. That part of a mineral deposit that could be
economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of
the reserve determination.
Roof. The stratum of rock or other mineral above a coal
seam; the overhead surface of a coal working place.
Resources. Concentrations of coal in such forms that
economic extraction is currently or may become feasible.
Room and pillar mining. A method of underground mining in
which about half of the coal is left in place to support the
roof of the active mining area. Large pillars are
left at regular intervals while rooms of coal are
extracted.
Scrubber (flue gas desulfurization system). Any of
several forms of chemical/physical devices which operate to
neutralize sulfur compounds formed during coal combustion. These
devices combine the sulfur in gaseous emissions with other
chemicals to form inert compounds, such as gypsum, that must
then be removed for disposal. Although effective in
substantially reducing sulfur from combustion gases, scrubbers
require about 6% to 7% of a power plants electrical output
and thousands of gallons of water to operate.
Steam coal. Coal used by electric power plants and
industrial steam boilers to produce electricity, steam or both.
It generally is lower in Btu heat content and higher in volatile
matter than metallurgical coal.
Sub-bituminous coal. Dull coal that ranks between lignite
and bituminous coal. Its moisture content is between 20% and 30%
by weight, and its heat content ranges from 7,800 to
9,500 Btus per pound of coal.
Sulfur. One of the elements present in varying quantities
in coal that contributes to environmental degradation when coal
is burned. Sulfur dioxide is produced as a gaseous by-product of
coal combustion.
Surface mine. A mine in which the coal lies near the
surface and can be extracted by removing the covering layer of
soil (see Overburden). About 60% of total
U.S. coal production comes from surface mines.
Tons. A short or net ton is equal to 2,000
pounds. A long or British ton is equal to
2,240 pounds; a metric tonne is approximately
2,205 pounds. The short ton is the unit of measure referred
to in this prospectus.
Truck-and-shovel/loader mining. Similar forms of mining
where large shovels or front-end loaders are used to remove
overburden, which is used to backfill pits after the coal is
removed. Smaller shovels load coal in haul trucks for
transportation to the preparation plant or rail loadout.
Underground mine. Also known as a deep mine. Usually
located several hundred feet below the earths surface, an
underground mines resource is removed mechanically and
transferred by shuttle car or conveyor to the surface. Most
common in the coal industry, underground mines primarily are
located east of the Mississippi River, and account for about
37.4% of total annual U.S. coal production.
Unit train. A train of 100 or more cars carrying only
coal. A typical unit train can carry at least 10,000 tons of
coal in a single shipment.
147
Index to financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13 |
|
|
|
|
F-14 |
|
|
|
|
F-15 |
|
|
|
|
F-16 |
|
|
|
|
F-17 |
|
|
|
|
F-18 |
|
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36 |
|
|
|
|
F-38 |
|
|
|
|
F-39 |
|
|
|
|
F-40 |
|
|
|
|
F-41 |
|
Notes to Combined Financial Statements as
of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004
to September 30, 2004, year ended December 31, 2003,
the period May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to
May 9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
|
|
|
F-42 |
|
F-1
Index to financial statements(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Anker Coal Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-72 |
|
|
|
|
F-73 |
|
|
|
|
F-74 |
|
|
|
|
F-75 |
|
|
|
|
F-76 |
|
|
|
|
F-77 |
|
CoalQuest Development, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-86 |
|
|
|
|
F-87 |
|
|
|
|
F-88 |
|
|
|
|
F-89 |
|
|
|
|
F-90 |
|
|
|
|
F-91 |
|
F-2
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
| |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
24,974 |
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
50,560 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
16,816 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
5,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
104,937 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
167,133 |
|
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS, net
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
ADVANCE ROYALTIES
|
|
|
4,986 |
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
183,946 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES, NON-CURRENT
|
|
|
5,997 |
|
OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
5,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
480,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$ |
27,766 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
Current portion of reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
Accrued income tax
|
|
|
5,166 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
35,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
75,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES, Less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
172,915 |
|
|
Reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
40,480 |
|
|
Long-term employee benefits
|
|
|
18,924 |
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
239,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
315,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock-par value $0.0001, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock-par value $0.0001, 1,800,000,000 shares
authorized, 106,605,999 issued and outstanding
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Additional Paid-In Capital
|
|
|
150,140 |
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
165,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
480,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Horizon | |
|
|
|
|
Companies | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales revenues
|
|
$ |
144,197 |
|
|
$ |
110,013 |
|
|
Freight and handling revenues
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
6,536 |
|
|
|
6,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
153,232 |
|
|
|
118,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues (exclusive of items shown
separately below)
|
|
|
117,184 |
|
|
|
98,002 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
8,522 |
|
|
|
9,502 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative (exclusive of depreciation
and amortization shown separately above)
|
|
|
4,935 |
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
133,140 |
|
|
|
111,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
20,092 |
|
|
|
6,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,145 |
) |
|
|
(37,217 |
) |
Reorganization items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,375 |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other income (expense)
|
|
|
(2,509 |
) |
|
|
(15,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss ) before income tax expense
|
|
|
17,583 |
|
|
|
(9,146 |
) |
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
|
|
|
(6,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
10,857 |
|
|
$ |
(9,146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.102 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
paid-in | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
stock | |
|
capital | |
|
earnings | |
|
Total | |
| |
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
150,140 |
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
$ |
154,400 |
|
|
Net income for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,857 |
|
|
|
10,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
150,140 |
|
|
$ |
15,106 |
|
|
$ |
165,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon | |
|
|
|
|
Companies | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Period from | |
|
Period from | |
|
|
January 1, 2005 to | |
|
January 1, 2004 to | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
10,857 |
|
|
$ |
(9,146 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
8,522 |
|
|
|
9,502 |
|
|
|
Amortization of finance costs included in interest expense
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
(Gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Writeoff of net payables to other Horizon subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(563 |
) |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(10,143 |
) |
|
|
(9,371 |
) |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(2,873 |
) |
|
|
(2,687 |
) |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,010 |
) |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
Increase (decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
6,516 |
|
|
|
(4,859 |
) |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
36,382 |
|
|
|
Accrued income tax
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(1,502 |
) |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
10,980 |
|
|
|
26,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
21,837 |
|
|
|
17,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment and mine development
|
|
|
(18,519 |
) |
|
|
(1,890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(18,519 |
) |
|
|
(1,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(2,066 |
) |
|
|
(3,630 |
) |
|
Net borrowings (repayments) on revolving line of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,757 |
) |
|
Repayments on capital leases
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(2,311 |
) |
|
|
(15,597 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
23,967 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
24,974 |
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
2,778 |
|
|
$ |
2,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-6
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of March 31, 2005 and for the period January 1,
2005 to March 31, 2005
(Unaudited), and combined financial statements for the period
January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2004 (Horizon Companies)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Unaudited Interim Financial InformationThe
accompanying unaudited interim financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles for interim financial information. The condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2005, condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, condensed combined statement of operations
for the three months ended March 31, 2004, the condensed
consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and the condensed combined statement of cash
flows for the three months ended March 31, 2004 are
unaudited, but include all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring adjustments) which the Company considers necessary for
a fair presentation of the financial position, operating results
and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of
operations for the interim periods are not indicative of the
results to be expected for the year or any future period.
The combined financial statements for the period January 1,
2004 to March 31, 2004 are carve-out financial statements
reflecting the operations and cash flows of the Horizon
properties (Horizon Companies) acquired by ICG on
September 30, 2004.
As of March 31, 2005 inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Coal
|
|
$ |
7,211 |
|
Parts and supplies, net of reserve for obsolescence of $132
|
|
|
9,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
As of March 31, 2005 property, plant and equipment are
summarized by major classification as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Land and land improvements
|
|
$ |
16,928 |
|
Mining and other equipment and related facilities
|
|
|
86,396 |
|
Mine development and contract costs
|
|
|
17,245 |
|
Coal reserves
|
|
|
53,031 |
|
Mine development in process
|
|
|
298 |
|
Construction work in process
|
|
|
9,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,598 |
|
Less-accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(16,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
$ |
167,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of March 31, 2005 and for the period January 1,
2005 to March 31, 2005
(Unaudited), and combined financial statements for the period
January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2004 (Horizon Companies)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Included in property, plant and equipment is $9,998 as of
March 31, 2005 related to development and construction
projects for which depreciation, depletion and amortization have
not yet commenced. Realization of these projects is reviewed on
a periodic basis.
|
|
4. |
ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER |
As of March 31, 2005 accrued expenses and other consisted
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Payroll, bonus and vacation expense
|
|
$ |
17,577 |
|
Sales and use tax
|
|
|
194 |
|
Severance tax
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
Federal reclamation tax
|
|
|
861 |
|
Excise/black lung tax
|
|
|
388 |
|
Personal property tax
|
|
|
4,519 |
|
Franchise tax
|
|
|
166 |
|
Other
|
|
|
10,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
35,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
Because of the Horizon Companies continuing losses, no
provision (benefit) for income taxes was recorded in the period
January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2004.
The income tax provision for the period January 1, 2005 to
March 31, 2005 is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
4,251 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,967 |
|
Deferred
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
6,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of March 31, 2005 and for the period January 1,
2005 to March 31, 2005
(Unaudited), and combined financial statements for the period
January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2004 (Horizon Companies)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Employee benefits at March 31, 2005 are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Postretirement benefits
|
|
$ |
8,356 |
|
Black lung benefits
|
|
|
10,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,924 |
|
Lesscurrent portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$ |
18,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
The components of net periodic benefit cost of the
postretirement plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
| |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
225,832 |
|
|
$ |
265,898 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
116,930 |
|
|
|
229,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit cost
|
|
$ |
342,762 |
|
|
$ |
495,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of net periodic benefit cost of black lung
benefits are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
| |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
421,649 |
|
|
$ |
350,133 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
155,785 |
|
|
|
65,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit cost
|
|
$ |
577,434 |
|
|
$ |
415,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Guarantees and Financial Instruments with Off-balance
Sheet RiskIn the normal course of business, the
Company is a party to certain guarantees and financial
instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as bank letters of
credit and performance or surety bonds. No liabilities related
to these arrangements are reflected in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet. Management does not expect any
material losses to result from these guarantees or off-balance
sheet financial instruments. The amount of bank letters of
credit outstanding as of March 31, 2005 is $50,177
including $49,925 outstanding under the revolving credit
facility. The Company is in the process of transferring
outstanding surety bonds, related to its reclamation
obligations, applicable to certain of the former Horizon
companies acquired on September 30, 2004.
Coal Sales Contracts and ContingencyAs of
March 31, 2005, the Company had commitments under twenty
sales contracts to deliver annually scheduled base quantities of
coal to fourteen customers. The contracts expire from 2005
through 2020 with the Company contracted to supply a minimum of
approximately 48.5 million tons of coal over the remaining
lives of the contracts (maximum of approximately
11.3 million tons in 2005). The Company also has
commitments to purchase certain amounts of coal to meet its
sales commitments. The purchase coal contracts expire
F-9
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of March 31, 2005 and for the period January 1,
2005 to March 31, 2005
(Unaudited), and combined financial statements for the period
January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2004 (Horizon Companies)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
through 2006 and provide the Company a minimum of approximately
4.6 million tons of coal through the remaining lives of the
contracts (approximately 2.6 million tons per year).
Certain of the contracts have sales price adjustment provisions,
subject to certain limitations and adjustments, based on a
variety of factors and indices.
LeasesThe Company leases various mining,
transportation, and other equipment under operating and capital
leases. Lease expense for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004 was $4,831 and $6,210, respectively. Property
under capital leases included in property, plant and equipment
in the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2005 was
approximately $974 less accumulated depreciation of
approximately $195. Depreciation of assets under capital leases
is included in depreciation expense.
The Company also leases coal reserves under agreements that call
for royalties to be paid as the coal is mined. Total royalty
expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
was $6,277 and $4,349, respectively. Certain agreements require
minimum annual royalties to be paid regardless of the amount of
coal mined during the year. Certain agreements may be cancelable
at the Companys discretion. Approximate non-cancelable
future minimum lease and royalty payments as of March 31,
2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
Capital | |
|
|
Royalties | |
|
leases | |
|
leases | |
| |
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 (April 1 to December 31, 2005)
|
|
$ |
7,349 |
|
|
$ |
9,789 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
2006
|
|
|
7,349 |
|
|
|
9,030 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
2007
|
|
|
6,340 |
|
|
|
3,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
6,196 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
34,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
Lessamount representing interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435 |
|
Lesscurrent portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonding Royalty and Additional
RoyaltyLexington Coal Company, LLC (LCC) was
organized in part by the founding ICG Stockholders in
conjunction with the acquisition of the former Horizon
companies. LCC was organized to assume certain reclamation
liabilities and assets of Horizon not otherwise being acquired
by ICG or others. There is a limited commonality of ownership of
LCC and ICG. In order to provide support to LCC, ICG provided a
$10,000 letter of credit to support reclamation obligations
(Bonding Royalty) and in addition agreed to pay a .75% royalty
on the gross sales receipts for coal mined and sold by the
former Horizon companies that ICG acquired from Horizon until
the completion by LCC of all reclamation liabilities that LCC
assumed from Horizon (Additional Royalty). On September 30,
2004 the Company prepaid $4,000 of such Additional Royalties,
accounting for the payment as additional purchase consideration.
All such Additional Royalties paid in the future will be
recorded as additional purchase price. For the Bonding Royalty,
ICG is required to pay an additional .75% on gross sales
referred to above, to a fund, controlled by
F-10
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of March 31, 2005 and for the period January 1,
2005 to March 31, 2005
(Unaudited), and combined financial statements for the period
January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2004 (Horizon Companies)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
one of its sureties until all letters of credit issued by such
surety for both ICG and LCC are cash collateralized. As of
March 31, 2005 ICG had paid and/or accrued approximately
$1,731 under this Bonding Royalty. Amounts in the fund
controlled by the Surety under this Bonding Royalty will be
returned to ICG as reclamation of properties is performed for
LCC or ICG and Surety Bonds are released. Under the provisions
of FIN 46, ICG has determined it does not hold a
significant variable interest in LCC and it is not the primary
beneficiary of LCC.
Legal MattersFrom time to time, the Company
is involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course
of business. In the opinion of management the Company has
recorded adequate reserves for these liabilities and there is no
individual case or group of related cases pending that is likely
to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
CommissionsThe Company has various sales and
agency agreements with third parties, whereby the Company pays a
$0.05 per ton commission on various coal sales agreements.
The costs are expensed as the coal is delivered. The Company
incurred commission expense of $4 and $114 for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Environmental MattersBased upon current
knowledge, the Company believes it is in material compliance
with environmental laws and regulations as currently
promulgated. However, the exact nature of environmental control
problems, if any, which the Company may encounter in the future
cannot be predicted, primarily because of the increasing number,
complexity and changing character of environmental requirements
that may be enacted by federal and state authorities.
Performance BondsAt March 31, 2005 the
Company has $50,177 including $49,925 outstanding under the
revolving credit facility, of letters of credit outstanding, a
portion of which ($40,500 including $10,000 to LCC
see bonding royalty above) provide support to the third parties
for their issuance of surety bonds. In addition the Company has
posted cash collateral of $5,816 to secure reclamation and other
performance commitments. This cash collateral is included in
other non-current assets on the consolidated balance sheet as of
March 31, 2005. The Company presently has a minimal amount
of outstanding surety bonds with third parties to secure
reclamation and other performance commitments. The Company is in
the process of transferring outstanding surety bonds, related to
its reclamation obligations, applicable to certain of the former
Horizon companies acquired on September 30, 2004. As of
March 31, 2005 the Company has accrued approximately $503
for premiums related to the surety bonds that will be
transferred.
Contract Mining AgreementsThe Company
performs contract-mining services for various third parties and
utilizes contract miners on some of its operations. Terms of the
agreements generally allow either party to terminate the
agreements on a short-term basis.
ICG, Inc.s subsidiary, ICG ADDCAR Systems, LLC
(ADDCAR) has entered into a contract to provide mining
services for a period of five years or until all mineable coal
is removed. ADDCAR is expected to produce and deliver a minimum
of 500,000 tons per year up to a maximum of 1,500,000 tons per
year. The guaranteed monthly contract tonnage shall be mutually
agreed upon. Failure to meet the guaranteed contract tonnage for
three consecutive months may result in termination of the
contract. All work under the contract must be completed no later
than March 31, 2008.
F-11
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of March 31, 2005 and for the period January 1,
2005 to March 31, 2005
(Unaudited), and combined financial statements for the period
January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2004 (Horizon Companies)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
ADDCAR entered into a three year contract to provide mining
services for a period of three years or until all mineable coal
is removed. ADDCAR is expected to produce and deliver a minimum
of 50,000 tons of coal per month that has an ash content of less
than fifteen percent. Failure to meet the guaranteed contract
tonnage and ash requirements for three consecutive months may
result in termination of the contract. All work under the
contract must be completed no later than January 15, 2007.
On April 25, 2005 the Company entered into an employment
agreement with its Senior Vice President and General Counsel
containing provisions for base salary, bonus and grant of stock
options and restricted shares of common stock.
F-12
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors
ICG, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
ICG, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31,
2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the period from
May 13, 2004 (inception) through December 31, 2004.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as of December 31, 2004 and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the period from May 13,
2004 (inception) through December 31, 2004, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
April 22, 2005
F-13
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
23,967 |
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
40,417 |
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
13,943 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
7,142 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
5,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
93,556 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
157,136 |
|
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS, Net
|
|
|
7,865 |
|
ADVANCE ROYALTIES
|
|
|
5,424 |
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
183,946 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES, NON-CURRENT
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
459,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$ |
21,250 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
6,022 |
|
|
Current portion of reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
Accrued income tax
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
33,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
66,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES, less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
173,446 |
|
|
Reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
40,616 |
|
|
Long-term employee benefits
|
|
|
18,007 |
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
7,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
239,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
305,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock-par value $0.0001, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock-par value $0.0001, 1,800,000,000 shares authorized,
106,605,999 issued and outstanding
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
150,140 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
4,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
154,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
459,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-14
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
May 13, 2004 to | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
| |
REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales revenues
|
|
$ |
130,463 |
|
|
Freight and handling revenues
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
4,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
136,109 |
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues
|
|
|
113,707 |
|
|
|
(exclusive of items shown separately below)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
7,943 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
4,194 |
|
|
|
(exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately
above)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
126,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
9,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,453 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other income (expense)
|
|
|
(2,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
6,840 |
|
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
|
|
|
(2,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
106,605,999 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-15
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period May 13, 2004 to | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Paid-in | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Total | |
| |
Capital Contribution
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
150,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
150,151 |
|
|
Net income for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
|
4,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BalanceDecember 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
150,140 |
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
$ |
154,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-16
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
May 13, 2004 to | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
7,943 |
|
|
|
Amortization of finance costs included in interest expense
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
(Gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
19,713 |
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
6,140 |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(2,030 |
) |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
Deferred finance costs
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
Increase (decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(3,815 |
) |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(1,527 |
) |
|
|
Reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
25,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
30,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of assets
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment and mine development
|
|
|
(5,583 |
) |
|
Acquisition of Horizon Natural Resources
|
|
|
(323,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(329,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution
|
|
|
150,151 |
|
|
Repayments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(2,969 |
) |
|
Repayments on capital leases
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
175,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
322,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents, and cash and cash
equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
23,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Horizon Natural Resources included in accrued
expenses
|
|
$ |
2,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-17
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries (ICG or
Company) was formed in 2004 by
WL Ross & Co., LLC, (WLR), and other
investors to acquire and operate competitive coal mining
facilities. On September 30, 2004 ICG acquired certain
properties and assets, and assumed certain liabilities, of
Horizon Natural Resources Company (Horizon) through
Section 363 asset sales of the United States Bankruptcy Court.
Prior to the acquisition, ICG did not have any material assets,
liabilities or results of operations.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
results of operations of the properties and assets acquired from
September 30, 2004 to December 31, 2004. Prior to
September 30, 2004, the Company was raising capital and did
not commence operations until October 1, 2004. ICG has one
reportable segment: the extracting, processing and marketing of
steam and metallurgical coal from deep and surface mines,
principally located in Kentucky, West Virginia and Illinois, for
sale to electric utilities and industrial customers primarily in
the eastern United States.
The September 30, 2004 acquisition of certain properties,
assets and liabilities was accounted for as a purchase. The
aggregate purchase price of $325,784 was allocated to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on the respective fair
values. The Horizon accounts receivable, advance royalties,
accounts payable and accrued expenses, intangibles, goodwill and
other assets and long-term liabilities were estimates of
management. An independent valuation specialist prepared
appraisals of the Horizon property, plant and equipment, coal
reserves and accrued reclamation obligations while employee
benefit valuations were prepared by independent actuaries. In
connection with the acquisition, the Company is required to make
certain payments to Lexington Coal Company (see note 10).
F-18
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of
acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
| |
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
60,130 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
20,083 |
|
Prepaids and other
|
|
|
6,508 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
159,496 |
|
Advance royalties
|
|
|
4,314 |
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
8,078 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
12,256 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
183,896 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(25,065 |
) |
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(35,422 |
) |
Employee benefits
|
|
|
(17,127 |
) |
Accrued reclamation
|
|
|
(43,889 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(7,474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
325,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
Funded by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution
|
|
$ |
150,151 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
175,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
325,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill increased from $183,896 at September 30, 2004 to
$183,946 at December 31, 2004 primarily due to additional
acquisition fees of $50. Goodwill of approximately $167,000 is
expected to be deductible for income tax purposes in future
years.
The unaudited pro forma information shown below assumes that the
certain properties and assets acquired and certain liabilities
assumed as of September 30, 2004, occurred as of
January 1, 2003. This pro forma financial information is
presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily
indicative of the results of future operations that will have
been achieved had the assets been acquired and liabilities
assumed at the beginning of 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon | |
|
|
ICG, Inc. | |
|
Predecessor to ICG, Inc. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Three months | |
|
Nine months | |
|
Twelve months | |
|
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
136,109 |
|
|
$ |
373,383 |
|
|
$ |
481,070 |
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
$ |
16,792 |
|
|
$ |
(61,911 |
) |
Basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
Net income (loss) per share is not presented for the Horizon
predecessor periods as the amounts are derived from carve out
financial statements reflecting the operations of Horizon
properties and assets acquired by ICG as of September 30,
2004.
|
|
2. |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND GENERAL |
Principles of Consolidation The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of ICG and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany transactions
and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company
considers all highly liquid debt instruments with maturities of
three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash
equivalents.
Trade Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts Trade accounts receivable are recorded at
the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for
doubtful accounts is the Companys best estimate of the
amount of probable credit losses in the Companys existing
accounts receivable. The Company establishes provisions for
losses on accounts receivable when it is probable that all or
part of the outstanding balance will not be collected. The
Company regularly reviews collectibility and establishes or
adjusts the allowance as necessary using the specific
identification method. No allowance for doubtful accounts was
considered necessary at December 31, 2004. The Company does
not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its
customers.
Inventories Inventories are stated at lower
of average cost or market. Components of inventories consist of
coal and parts and supplies, net of an allowance for
obsolescence (see Note 3). Coal inventories represent coal
contained in stockpiles and exposed in the pit, including those
tons that have been uncovered or mined and hauled to our load
out facilities but not yet shipped to customers. These
inventories are stated on clean coal equivalent tons and take
into account any loss that may occur during the processing
stage. Coal must be of a quality that can be sold on existing
sales orders to be carried as coal inventory. The majority of
our coal inventory does not require extensive processing prior
to shipment. In most cases processing consists of crushing or
sizing the coal prior to loading into the truck or rail car for
shipment to the customer.
Derivative Financial Instruments The
Companys hedging policies permit the use of interest rate
swaps and caps to manage interest rate risk. The Company does
not use derivative financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes. Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended,
establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments and hedging activities. The Companys
derivative instrument described below has been designated and
qualifies as a cash flow hedge. To qualify for hedge accounting
under SFAS No. 133, the effectiveness of each hedging
relationship is assessed both at hedge inception and at each
reporting period thereafter. Also, at the end of each reporting
period, ineffectiveness in the hedging relationships is measured
as the difference between the change in fair value of the
derivative instruments and the change in fair value of either
the hedged items (fair value hedges) or expected cash flows
(cash flow hedges). Ineffectiveness, if any, is recorded in
interest expense.
During 2004, the Company entered into an Interest Rate Cap
Agreement (Cap Agreement), expiring
December 15, 2006, and paid $184 to hedge its interest risk
on $88,000 notional amount of term debt. The interest rate cap
is designed to offset the impact of changes in the LIBOR
interest rate above the cap rate of 4.5%. The Cap Agreement,
included in other noncurrent assets in the Companys
F-20
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
consolidated balance sheet, was written down to its fair value
of approximately $164 as of December 31, 2004. The
writedown resulted in a loss of approximately $20 in the period
ended December 31, 2004.
Advance Royalties The Company is required,
under certain royalty lease agreements, to make minimum royalty
payments whether or not mining activity is being performed on
the leased property. These minimum payments may be recoupable
once mining begins on the leased property. The recoupable
minimum royalty payments are capitalized and amortized based on
the units-of-production method at a rate defined in the lease
agreement once mining activities begin. Unamortized deferred
royalty costs are expensed when mining has ceased or a decision
is made not to mine on such property. The Company has recorded
advance royalties of $7,022 ($1,598 included in prepaid expense
and other and $5,424 included in non-current assets) at
December 31, 2004.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property,
plant and equipment, including coal reserves and mine
development costs are recorded at cost, which includes
construction overhead and interest, where applicable.
Expenditures for major renewals and betterments are capitalized
while expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as
incurred. Coal reserve costs are depleted using the
units-of-production method, based on estimated recoverable
interest. Mine development costs are amortized using the
units-of-production method, based on estimated recoverable
interest. Other property, plant and equipment is depreciated
using the straight-line method with estimated useful lives
substantially as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years | |
| |
Buildings
|
|
|
10 to 45 |
|
Mining and other equipment and related facilities
|
|
|
1 to 20 |
|
Land improvements
|
|
|
15 |
|
Transportation equipment
|
|
|
2 to 7 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
3 to 10 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense for the period
May 13, 2004 to December 31, 2004 was $7,943.
Goodwill In accordance with
FAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, goodwill cannot be amortized, however, it must be
tested annually for impairment. The goodwill impairment test has
two steps. The first, identifies potential impairments by
comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its book
value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting
unit exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill is not impaired and
the second step is not necessary. If the carrying value exceeds
the fair value, the second step calculates the possible
impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill
with the carrying amount. If the implied goodwill is less than
the carrying amount, a write-down is recorded. The Company
performs its impairment test in December of each year. The
impairment review in December 2004 supported the carrying value
of goodwill, and as such, no write-down in the carrying value of
goodwill was recorded.
Debt Issuance Costs Debt issuance costs
reflect fees incurred to obtain financing. Debt issuance costs
are amortized (included in interest expense) using the effective
interest method, over the life of the related debt. Amortization
expense for the period May 13, 2004 to December 31,
2004 was $266.
F-21
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
Restricted Cash Restricted cash includes
amounts required by various royalty and reclamation agreements.
Restricted cash of $4,243 at December 31, 2004 is included
in other non-current assets ($3,744) and prepaid expenses and
other ($499).
Coal Mine Reclamation and Mine Closure Costs
Future cost requirements for land reclamation are estimated
where surface and deep mining operations have been conducted,
based on the Companys interpretation of the technical
standards of regulations enacted by the U.S. Office of Surface
Mining, as well as state regulations. These costs relate to
reclaiming the pit and support acreage at surface mines and
sealing portals at deep mines. Other costs common to both types
of mining are related to reclaiming refuse and slurry ponds as
well as holding and related termination/exit costs.
The Company records these reclamation obligations under the
provision of SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 addresses
asset retirement obligations that result from the acquisition,
construction or normal operation of long-lived assets. It
requires companies to recognize asset retirement obligations at
fair value when the liability is incurred. Upon initial
recognition of a liability, that cost should be capitalized as
part of the related long-lived asset and allocated to expense
over the useful life of the asset. The asset retirement costs
are recorded in coal reserves.
The Company expenses reclamation performed prior to final mine
closure. The establishment of the end of mine reclamation and
closure liability is based upon permit requirements and requires
significant estimates and assumptions, principally associated
with regulatory requirements, costs and recoverable coal
reserves. Annually, the end of mine reclamation and closure
liability is reviewed and necessary adjustments are made,
including adjustments due to mine plan and permit changes and
revisions to cost and production levels to optimize mining and
reclamation efficiency. The amount of such adjustments is
reflected in the SFAS No. 143 year-end calculation.
Asset Impairments and Accelerated Mine Closing
Accruals The Company follows
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which requires that projected
future cash flows from use and disposition of assets be compared
with the carrying amounts of those assets. When the sum of
projected cash flows is less than the carrying amount,
impairment losses are recognized. In determining such impairment
losses, discounted cash flows are utilized to determine the fair
value of the assets being evaluated. Also, in certain
situations, expected mine lives are shortened because of changes
to planned operations. When that occurs and it is determined
that the mines underlying costs are not recoverable in the
future, reclamation and mine closing obligations are accelerated
and the mine closing accrual is increased accordingly. To the
extent it is determined asset carrying values will not be
recoverable during a shorter mine life, a provision for such
impairment is recognized.
Income Tax Provision The provision for
income taxes includes federal, state and local income taxes
currently payable and deferred taxes arising from temporary
differences between the financial statement and tax basis of
assets and liabilities. Income taxes are recorded under the
liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxes are
recognized for the estimated future tax effects of differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their
financial reporting amounts as well as net operating loss
carryforwards and tax credits based on enacted tax laws.
Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Revenue Recognition Coal revenues result
from sales contracts (long-term coal contracts or purchase
orders) with electric utilities, industrial companies or other
coal-related organizations, primarily in the
F-22
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
eastern United States. Revenue is recognized and recorded at the
time of shipment or delivery to the customer, at fixed or
determinable prices, and the title has passed in accordance with
the terms of the sales agreement. Under the typical terms of
these agreements, risk of loss transfers to the customers at the
mine or port, where coal is loaded to the rail, barge, truck or
other transportation source(s) that delivers coal to its
destination.
Freight and handling costs paid to third-party carriers and
invoiced to coal customers are recorded as freight and handling
costs and freight and handling revenues, respectively.
Other revenues consist of equipment and parts sales, equipment
rebuild and maintenance services, coal handling and processing,
royalties, commissions on coal trades, contract mining, and
rental income. With respect to other revenues recognized in
situations unrelated to the shipment of coal, we carefully
review the facts and circumstances of each transaction and apply
the relevant accounting literature as appropriate, and do not
recognize revenue until the following criteria are met:
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered; the sellers price
to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is
reasonably assured. Advance payments received are deferred and
recognized in revenue as coal is shipped or rentals are earned.
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
As prescribed by SFAS No. 106, Employers
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,
accruals are made, based on annual outside actuarial valuations,
for the expected costs of providing postretirement benefits
other than pensions, which are primarily medical benefits,
during an employees actual working career.
The Company accounts for health care and life insurance benefits
provided for current and future retired employees and their
dependents by accruing the cost of such benefits over the
service lives of employees. Unrecognized actuarial gains and
losses are amortized over the estimated average remaining
service period for active employees.
Workers Compensation and Black Lung
Benefits The Company is liable under federal and
state laws to pay workers compensation and pneumoconiosis
(black lung) benefits to eligible employees. The Company
utilizes a combination of a large deductible insurance program,
self-insurance and state workers compensation fund
participation to secure on-going obligations depending on the
location of the operation. For pneumoconiosis (black lung
liabilities), provisions are made for estimated benefits based
on annual evaluations prepared by independent actuaries. The
Company follows SFAS No. 112, Employers Accounting
for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions for purposes
of accounting for its black lung liabilities and assets.
Managements Use of Estimates The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Significant items
subject to such estimates and assumptions include the allowance
for doubtful accounts; inventories; coal reserves; asset
retirement obligations; employee benefit liabilities; future
cash flows associated with assets; useful lives for
depreciation, depletion and amortization; workers
compensation claims; postretirement benefits other than
pensions; income taxes; and fair value of financial instruments.
Due to the subjective nature of these estimates, actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Accounting PronouncementsIn January 2005,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Statement 123R, Accounting for Stock Based
Compensation. FASB Statement 123R supersedes
F-23
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
APB Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. This statement establishes standards of
accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its
equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses
transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange
for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the
entitys equity instruments or that may be settled by the
issuance of those equity instruments. FASB 123R is
effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning
after June 15, 2005. The Company believes adoption of FASB
123R will have no material impact on its financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows.
In December 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation
NO. 46 (FIN 46-R), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entitiesan Interpretation of Accounting
Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51 which is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2003. This Interpretation of Accounting
Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements which replaces FASB Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, addresses
consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest
entities. Management has determined the adoption of
FIN 46-R did not have a material effect on its consolidated
financial statements.
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 04-02
addresses the issue of whether mineral rights are tangible or
intangible assets. FASB Statement No. 141, Business
Combinations, requires the acquirer in a business
combination to allocate the cost of the acquisition to the
acquired assets and liabilities. At the March 1718,
2004 meeting, the EITF reached a consensus that mineral rights
(defined as the legal right to explore, extract and retain at
least a portion of the benefits from mineral deposits) are
tangible assets. As a result of the EITFs consensus, the
FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) Nos.
SFAS No. 141-a and SFAS No. 142-a,
Interaction of FASB Statements No. 141, Business
Combinations and No 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, and EITF Issue No. 04-02, Whether
Mineral Rights Are Tangible or Intangible Assets, which
amend SFAS Nos. 141 and 142 and results in the
classification of mineral rights as tangible assets. The Company
has recorded mineral rights as tangible assets.
3. INVENTORIES
As of December 31, 2004 inventories consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal
|
|
$ |
4,443 |
|
Parts and supplies, net of a reserve for obsolescence of $74
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
13,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND
EQUIPMENT
As of December 31, 2004 property, plant and equipment are
summarized by major classification as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and land improvements
|
|
$ |
16,798 |
|
Mining and other equipment and related facilities
|
|
|
72,590 |
|
Mine development and contract costs
|
|
|
16,012 |
|
Coal reserves
|
|
|
53,031 |
|
Mine development in process
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
Construction work in process
|
|
|
5,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,079 |
|
Less-accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(7,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
$ |
157,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
Included in property, plant and equipment is $6,648, as of
December 31, 2004, related to development and construction
projects for which depreciation, depletion and amortization have
not yet commenced. Realization of these projects is reviewed on
a periodic basis.
5. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER
As of December 31, 2004 accrued expenses and other
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll, bonus and vacation expense
|
|
$ |
16,163 |
|
Sales and use tax
|
|
|
143 |
|
Severance tax
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
Federal reclamation tax
|
|
|
918 |
|
Excise/black lung tax
|
|
|
344 |
|
Personal property tax
|
|
|
5,080 |
|
Franchise tax
|
|
|
58 |
|
Other
|
|
|
9,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
33,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
6. DEBT
As of December 31, 2004 debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Notes
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
Capital leases (Note 10)
|
|
|
681 |
|
Insurance financing and other
|
|
|
3,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
179,468 |
|
Lesscurrent portion
|
|
|
6,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
$ |
173,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
Credit FacilityAt December 31, 2004 the
Company has a Credit Facility consisting of a $110,000 revolving
credit facility, of which up to a maximum of $60,000 may be
utilized for letters of credit, and a $175,000 term loan
facility.
The revolving credit facility has a five-year term and matures
on November 5, 2009. Borrowings bear interest, at the
Companys option, at either LIBOR plus a margin ranging
from 2.00% to 2.50% per annum or the prime rate plus a margin
ranging from 1.00% to 1.50% per annum. As of December 31,
2004, ICG had $55,575 available on this revolving credit
facility, net of $54,425 in letters of credit for insurance,
workers compensation and reclamation bonds.
The Term Notes mature on November 5, 2010. Principal
payments of $438 per quarter are due from January 10, 2005
through October 10, 2009 and payments of $41,563 per
quarter are due each of the remaining four quarters. The Notes
bear interest, at the Companys option, at either LIBOR
plus 2.75% per annum or the prime rate plus 1.75% per annum. As
of December 31, 2004 the Notes bear interest at 4.99%.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by
substantially all of the Companys and its subsidiaries
assets, as well as by a pledge of 100% of the stock of all
subsidiaries. In addition, the Company and each of its other
non-borrower subsidiaries guarantee all of the indebtedness
under the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility requires certain mandatory prepayments upon
the receipt of the proceeds from certain asset sales, casualty
events, debt or equity offerings and in the event that there is
excess cash flow as determined in accordance with the credit
facility. The Credit Facility requires 50% of the proceeds of a
public offering (net of any underwriting fees, discounts,
commissions and other costs and expenses) to be applied as a
prepayment of the Term Notes.
The Credit Facility contains financial covenants including; a
maximum leverage ratio, a minimum interest coverage ratio, a
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a limit on capital
expenditures. The Credit Facility also contains certain other
covenants, including, but not limited to, limitations on the
incurrence of indebtedness, asset dispositions, acquisitions,
investments, dividends and other restricted payments, liens and
transactions with affiliates. At December 31, 2004, the
Company was in compliance with all the above covenants.
Future maturities of the Term Notes are as follows as of
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31: |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
166,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
7. |
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION |
At December 31, 2004 the Company recorded an asset
retirement obligation accrual for reclamation and mine closure
costs totaling $43,298.
The following schedule represents activity in the accrual for
reclamation and mine closure cost obligation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 13, 2004 to | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
| |
Liabilities assumed in the acquisition
|
|
$ |
43,889 |
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
(1,349 |
) |
Accretion
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
$ |
43,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accrued reclamation and mine closure cost obligations are
included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
| |
Current portion of reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
$ |
2,682 |
|
Non-current reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
40,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
43,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax provision for the period May 13, 2004 to
December 31, 2004 is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 13, 2004 to | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
| |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
1,901 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
Deferred
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
The following table presents the difference between the actual
tax provision and the amounts obtained by applying the statutory
U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to income and losses
before income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 13, 2004 to | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
| |
Federal provision computed at statutory rate
|
|
$ |
2,394 |
|
State income tax provision (net of federal tax benefits and
apportionment factors) computed at statutory rate
|
|
|
219 |
|
Other
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets
and liabilities as of December 31, 2004 are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued employee benefits
|
|
$ |
6,932 |
|
|
Accrued reclamation and closure
|
|
|
16,670 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, coal reserves and mine development costs
|
|
|
16,514 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$ |
9,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
Classified in balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxescurrent
|
|
$ |
2,188 |
|
|
Deferred income taxesnon-current
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
9,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefits at December 31, 2004 are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
$ |
8,013 |
|
Black lung benefits
|
|
|
9,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,007 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$ |
18,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
Certain employees of the Company, who have completed eight years
of service with the former Horizon companies, will be eligible
to receive postretirement benefits after two years of service
with the Company. Upon reaching the retirement age of 65, in
order to receive a maximum medical life-time benefit of one
hundred thousand dollars per family, eligible retired employees
must pay two hundred and fifty dollars per month per family. The
Company accrues postretirement benefit expense based on
actuarially determined amounts. The amount of postretirement
benefit cost accrued is impacted by various assumptions
(discount rate, health care cost increases, etc.) that the
Company uses in determining its postretirement obligations.
Postretirement benefit expense for the Company totaled $330 for
the period May 13, 2004 to December 31, 2004.
Valuation Date All actuarially determined
benefits were determined as of December 31, 2004.
Postretirement Benefits The following
postretirement benefit information was prepared for ICG for the
period May 13, 2004 to December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement | |
|
|
Benefits | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
| |
Changes in Benefit Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligations assumed in the acquisition
|
|
$ |
7,683 |
|
|
Service costs
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$ |
8,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status of the Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated obligations less plan assets
|
|
$ |
(8,134 |
) |
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability recognized
|
|
$ |
(8,013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 13, 2004 to | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
| |
Net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit cost
|
|
$ |
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
For measurement purposes, a 10% annual rate of increase in the
per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed,
gradually decreasing to 5% in 2014 and remaining level
thereafter.
F-29
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
The expense and liability estimates can fluctuate by significant
amounts based upon the assumptions used by the actuaries. As of
December 31, 2004, a one-percentage-point change in assumed
health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Percentage- | |
|
1-Percentage- | |
|
|
Point | |
|
Point | |
|
|
Increase | |
|
Decrease | |
| |
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
(156 |
) |
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
(889 |
) |
On December 8, 2003, the President of the United States
signed into law the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and
Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act). The Act
introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare
(Medicare Part D) as well as a federal subsidy
to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a
benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare
Part D.
In May 2004, the FASB issued further guidance with the release
of FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-2, Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements related to the Medicare Prescription
Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (FSP
106-2). The effective date of FSP 106-2 is for the
first interim or annual period beginning after June 15,
2004. As of December 31, 2004, the Company is unable to
conclude whether the benefits provided by the plan are
actuarially equivalent to benefits under Part D. Consequently,
the Company has not reduced its other post-employment benefit
obligation for the potential benefit of the Act.
Workers Compensation and Black Lung
The operations of the Company are subject to the federal and
state workers compensation laws. These laws provide for
the payment of benefits to disabled workers and their
dependents, including lifetime benefits for black lung. The
Companys subsidiary operations are fully insured by either
a large deductible insurance program or state fund for
workers compensation obligations and self-insured for
black lung obligations.
The Companys actuarially determined liability for
self-insured black lung benefits is based on a 5.75% discount
rate and various other assumptions including incidence of
claims, benefits escalation, terminations and life expectancy.
The annual black lung expense consists of actuarially determined
amounts for self-insured obligations. The estimated amount of
discounted obligations for self-insured black lung claims plus
an estimate for incurred but not reported claims was $9,917 as
of December 31, 2004. The unrecognized projected black lung
benefit obligations (difference between recorded accrual and
projected obligations) at December 31, 2004 was
approximately $77 and is being provided for over the future
service period of current employees. The projected black lung
obligations may vary in a given year based on the timing of
claims filed and changes in actuarial assumptions. The Company
recorded expenses related to black lung of $551 for the period
May 13, 2004 to December 31, 2004.
401(k) Plans The Company sponsors a savings
and retirement plan for substantially all employees. The Company
matches voluntary contributions of participants up to a maximum
contribution of 3% of a participants salary. The Company
also contributes an additional 3% non-elective contribution for
every employee eligible to participate in the program. The
expense under this plan for the Company was $733 for the period
May 13, 2004 to December 31, 2004.
F-30
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
10. COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
Guarantees and Financial Instruments with Off-balance
Sheet Risk In the normal course of business, the
Company is a party to certain guarantees and financial
instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as bank letters of
credit and performance or surety bonds. No liabilities related
to these arrangements are reflected in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet. Management does not expect any
material losses to result from these guarantees or off-balance
sheet financial instruments. The amount of bank letters of
credit outstanding as of December 31, 2004 is $54,677,
including $54,425 outstanding under the revolving credit
facility. The Company is in the process of transferring
outstanding surety bonds, related to its reclamation
obligations, applicable to certain of the former Horizon
companies acquired on September 30, 2004.
Coal Sales Contracts and ContingencyAs of
December 31, 2004, the Company had commitments under
nineteen sales contracts to deliver annually scheduled base
quantities of coal to fourteen customers. The contracts expire
from 2005 through 2020 with the Company contracted to supply a
minimum of approximately 48 million tons of coal over the
remaining lives of the contracts (maximum of approximately
10.5 million tons in 2005). The Company also has
commitments to purchase certain amounts of coal to meet its
sales commitments. The purchase coal contracts expire through
2006 and provide the Company a minimum of approximately
5.2 million tons of coal through the remaining lives of the
contracts (approximately 2.6 million tons per year).
Certain of the contracts have sales price adjustment provisions,
subject to certain limitations and adjustments, based on a
variety of factors and indices.
LeasesThe Company leases various mining,
transportation and other equipment under operating and capital
leases. Lease expense for the period May 13, 2004 to
December 31, 2004 was $5,885. Property under capital leases
included in property, plant and equipment in the consolidated
balance sheet at December 31, 2004 was approximately $975,
less accumulated depreciation of approximately $97. Depreciation
of assets under capital leases is included in depreciation
expense.
The Company also leases coal reserves under agreements that call
for royalties to be paid as the coal is mined. Total royalty
expense for the period May 13, 2004 to December 31,
2004 was approximately $5,119. Certain agreements require
minimum annual royalties to be paid regardless of the amount of
F-31
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
coal mined during the year. Certain agreements may be cancelable
at the Companys discretion. Approximate non-cancelable
future minimum lease and royalty payments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
Capital | |
|
|
Royalties | |
|
Leases | |
|
Leases | |
| |
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
7,348 |
|
|
$ |
13,506 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
2006
|
|
|
7,348 |
|
|
|
9,004 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
2007
|
|
|
6,339 |
|
|
|
3,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
6,189 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
6,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
29,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
712 |
|
Lessamount representing interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
681 |
|
Lesscurrent portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonding Royalty and Additional
RoyaltyLexington Coal Company, LLC (LCC) was
organized in part by the founding ICG Stockholders in
conjunction with the acquisition of the former Horizon
companies. LCC was organized to assume certain reclamation
liabilities and assets of Horizon not otherwise being acquired
by ICG or others. There is a limited commonality of ownership of
LCC and ICG. In order to provide support to LCC, ICG provided a
$10,000 letter of credit to support reclamation obligations
(Bonding Royalty) and in addition agreed to pay a .75% royalty
on the gross sales receipts for coal mined and sold by the
former Horizon companies that ICG acquired from Horizon until
the completion by LCC of all reclamation liabilities that LCC
assumed from Horizon (Additional Royalty). On September 30,
2004 the Company prepaid $4,000 of such Additional Royalties,
accounting for the payment as additional purchase consideration.
All such Additional Royalties paid in the future will be
recorded as additional purchase price. For the Bonding Royalty,
ICG is required to pay an additional .75% on gross sales
referred to above, to a fund, controlled by one of its sureties
until all letters of credit issued by such surety for both ICG
and LCC are cash collateralized. As of December 31, 2004,
ICG had accrued approximately $831 under this Bonding Royalty.
Amounts in the fund controlled by the Surety under this Bonding
Royalty will be returned to ICG as reclamation of properties is
performed by LCC or ICG and Surety Bonds are released.
Under the provisions of FIN 46, ICG has determined it does
not hold a significant variable interest in LCC and it is not
the primary beneficiary of LCC.
Legal MattersFrom time to time, the Company
is involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course
of business. In the opinion of management the Company has
recorded adequate reserves for these liabilities and there is no
individual case or group of related cases pending that is likely
to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
CommissionsThe Company has various sales and
agency agreements with third parties, whereby the Company pays a
$0.05 per ton commission on various coal sales agreements. The
costs are expensed
F-32
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
as the coal is delivered. The Company incurred commission
expense of $1 for the period May 13, 2004 to
December 31, 2004.
Environmental MattersBased upon current
knowledge, the Company believes it is in material compliance
with environmental laws and regulations as currently
promulgated. However, the exact nature of environmental control
problems, if any, which the Company may encounter in the future
cannot be predicted, primarily because of the increasing number,
complexity and changing character of environmental requirements
that may be enacted by federal and state authorities.
Performance BondsThe Company has $54,677,
including $54,425 outstanding under the revolving credit
facility, of letters of credit outstanding, a portion of which
($45,000, including $10,000 to LCCsee bonding royalty
above) provide support to the third parties for their issuance
of surety bonds. In addition, the Company has posted cash
collateral of $4,243 to secure other reclamation and performance
commitments. This cash collateral is included in other
non-current assets on the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2004. The Company presently has a minimal
amount of outstanding surety bonds with third parties to secure
reclamation and other performance commitments. The Company is in
the process of transferring outstanding surety bonds, related to
its reclamation obligations, applicable to certain of the former
Horizon companies acquired on September 30, 2004. As of
December 31, 2004 the Company has accrued approximately
$251 for premiums related to the surety bonds that will be
transferred.
Contract Mining AgreementsThe Company
performs contract-mining services for various third parties and
utilizes contract miners on some of its operations. Terms of the
agreements generally allow either party to terminate the
agreements on a short-term basis.
ICG, Incs subsidiary, ICG ADDCAR Systems, LLC (ADDCAR) has
entered into a contract to provide mining services for a period
of five years or until all mineable coal is removed. ADDCAR is
expected to produce and deliver a minimum of 500,000 tons per
year up to a maximum of 1,500,000 tons per year. The guaranteed
monthly contract tonnage shall be mutually agreed upon. Failure
to meet the guaranteed contract tonnage for three consecutive
months may result in termination of the contract. All work under
the contract must be completed no later than March 31, 2008.
ADDCAR entered into a three year contract to provide mining
services for a period of three years or until all mineable coal
is removed. ADDCAR is expected to produce and deliver a minimum
of 50,000 tons of coal per month that has an ash content of less
than fifteen percent. Failure to meet the guaranteed contract
tonnage and ash requirements for three consecutive months may
result in termination of the contract. All work under the
contract must be completed no later than January 15, 2007.
F-33
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
11. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The Company had coal sales to the following major customers that
equaled or exceeded 10% of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
May 13, 2004 to | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
Total | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
Receivable | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Revenues | |
| |
Customer A
|
|
$ |
2,563 |
|
|
$ |
17,720 |
|
Customer B
|
|
|
6,581 |
|
|
|
19,151 |
|
Customer C
|
|
|
5,751 |
|
|
|
19,759 |
|
12. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial
instruments are determined based on relevant market information.
These estimates involve uncertainty and cannot be determined
with precision. The following methods and assumptions were used
to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Trade Accounts Receivable,
Trade Accounts Payable, and Other Current Liabilities:
The carrying amounts approximate the fair value due to
the short maturity of these instruments.
Long-term Debt and Interest Rate Cap: The fair
value of the term loan facility at December 31, 2004 is
based on the market value of the facility, as the interest rate
is stated at LIBOR plus a margin. The carrying value of the
Companys capital lease obligations and other debt
approximate fair value at December 31, 2004. The fair value
of the Companys interest rate cap was $164 at
December 31, 2004.
13. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
AND BALANCES
Under an Advisory Services Agreement, dated as of
October 1, 2004 between ICG and WLR, WLR has agreed to
provide advisory services to ICG (consisting of consulting and
advisory services in connection with strategic and financial
planning, investment management and administration and other
matters relating to the business and operation of ICG of a type
customarily provided by sponsors of U.S. private equity firms to
companies in which they have substantial investments, including
any consulting or advisory services which the Board of Directors
reasonably requests). WLR is to be paid a quarterly fee of
$500,000 and reimbursed for any reasonable out of pocket
expenses (including expenses of third-party advisors retained by
WLR). The agreement is for a period of seven years; however, it
may be terminated upon the occurrence of certain events.
On October 1, 2004, ICG entered into an agreement with
Insuratex, LTD, a wholly owned subsidiary of funds controlled by
WLR, to administer and pay workers compensation claims
incurred by ICG. ICG paid an initial $2.5 million premium to
fund such claims and will continue to pay monthly installments
of $0.2 million until a total premium of $5.0 million is
paid by ICG. The $5.0 million annual premium is to be adjusted
after the initial 18 months based on actual workers
compensation loss experienced.
F-34
ICG, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004
to December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
14. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On March 31, 2005, ICG, Inc. entered into business
combination agreements with each of Anker Coal Group, Inc. and
CoalQuest Development LLC pursuant to which each of Anker and
CoalQuest are to become indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of
ICG. Holders of all of the outstanding stock of Anker and the
membership interests in CoalQuest will be issued shares of ICG
common stock with an aggregate value of $275 million, up to
a maximum number of shares equal to 22.5% of the common stock of
ICG outstanding on the date of the agreement. The aggregate
number of common shares to be issued will be based upon the
price of the shares of common stock in a public offering. The
acquisitions are subject to certain closing conditions. The
unaudited pro forma impact of this combination as of
March 31, 2005, and for the period then ended, is as
follows: Total assets increased $384 million (primarily
property, plant and equipment of approximately $158 million
and goodwill of approximately $191 million), total
liabilities increased $93 million (primarily long-term debt
and capital leases of approximately $28 million, accounts
payable and accrued expenses of approximately $24 million
and reclamation and mine closure costs of approximately
$26 million), total stockholders equity increased
$384 million, total revenues increased $48.3 million,
and total costs and expenses increased $48 million and net
income increased $353 thousand.
On March 14, 2005, the Company entered into an employment
agreement with its President and Chief Executive Officer
containing provisions for base salary, bonus and grant of stock
options and restricted shares of common stock.
F-35
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Members
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries:
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries (Combined
Companies) (Debtors-in-Possession) as of
September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
(Reorganized Companies), and the related combined
statements of operations, members deficit and cash flows
for the Period January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004,
for year ended December 31, 2003, for the period
May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002 (Reorganized
Companies), and for the period January 1, 2002 to
May 9, 2002 (Predecessor Companies). The
Combined Companies are wholly owned subsidiaries of Horizon
Natural Resources Company. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Combined Companies management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
As more fully described in Notes 2 to 4 to the combined
financial statements, the combined financial statements reflect
the application of fresh-start reporting as of May 9, 2002
and, therefore, the combined financial statements for periods
after May 9, 2002 are not comparable in all respects to the
combined financial statements for periods prior to such date.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the combined financial position of the
Reorganized Companies as of September 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003 and the combined results of their
operations and their combined cash flows for the period
January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004, year ended
December 31, 2003 and for the period from May 10, 2002
through December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Further, in our opinion, the financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the combined
results of the Predecessor Companies operations and their
combined cash flows for the period from January 1, 2002
through May 9, 2002, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As described in Note 1 to the combined financial
statements, the accompanying combined financial statements have
been prepared from the separate records maintained by the
Combined Companies and are not necessarily indicative of the
conditions that would have existed or the results of operations
if the Combined Companies has been operated as unaffiliated
entities. Portions of certain assets and expense items represent
allocations made from items applicable to Horizon Natural
Resources Company (Parent) and subsidiaries as a whole.
The accompanying combined financial statements have been
prepared assuming that the Combined Companies will continue as a
going concern, which contemplates continuity of the Combined
Companies operations and realization of its assets and
payments of its liabilities in the ordinary course of business.
As discussed in Notes 1 and 2 of the combined
financial statements, the Combined Companies have suffered
recurring losses from operations and have a net members
deficit as of September 30, 2004. The Combined Companies
also have significant debt obligations maturing in October 2004.
Furthermore, during November 2002, the Combined Companies
Parent and its other subsidiaries, inclusive of the Combined
Companies, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under
F-36
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The
accompanying combined financial statements do not purport to
reflect or provide for the consequences of those bankruptcy
proceedings. In particular, such combined financial statements
do not purport to show (a) as to assets, their realizable
value on a liquidation basis or their availability to satisfy
liabilities; (b) as to pre-petition liabilities, the
amounts that may be allowed for claims or contingencies, or the
status and priority thereof; (c) as to member accounts, the
effect of any changes that may be made in the capitalization of
the Combined Companies; or (d) as to operations, the effect
of any changes that may be made in its business. In addition, as
also described in Note 2, the Combined Companies are in
default of various covenants and provisions, including debt
service payments, of its principal debt instruments (other than
its debtor-in-possession financing facility) which makes such
obligations currently due. These matters raise substantial doubt
about the Combined Companies ability to continue as a
going concern. Managements plans in regard to these
matters are also described in Notes 1 and 2. The Combined
Companies are currently operating their business as a
debtor-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the United States
Bankruptcy Court, and continuation of the Combined Companies as
a going concern is contingent upon, among other things, the
Combined Companies ability to comply with all debt
covenants under the existing debtor-in-possession financing
agreements, to generate sufficient cash flow from operations,
and to obtain financing sources to meet its future obligations.
If no reorganization plan is approved or no refinancing of the
October 2004 debt obligations is obtained, it is possible that
the Combined Companies assets may be liquidated. The
combined financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recoverability and classification of asset
carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities
that might result should the Combined Companies be unable to
continue as a going concern.
/s/ Deloitte and Touche LLP
LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY
MARCH 25, 2005
F-37
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized Companies | |
|
|
| |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
Trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $5,441 and $7,798, respectively)
|
|
|
46,117 |
|
|
|
35,658 |
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
17,721 |
|
|
|
13,479 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5,931 |
|
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
4,668 |
|
|
|
6,707 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
|
|
10,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
78,836 |
|
|
|
73,056 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
276,157 |
|
|
|
318,552 |
|
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
ADVANCE ROYALTIES
|
|
|
10,501 |
|
|
|
9,976 |
|
OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
4,804 |
|
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
370,298 |
|
|
$ |
407,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES NOT SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$ |
29,975 |
|
|
$ |
36,670 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
30,603 |
|
|
|
62,698 |
|
|
Current portion of reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
27,977 |
|
|
|
27,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
89,761 |
|
|
|
128,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES, Less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
Reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
22,436 |
|
|
|
27,443 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5,931 |
|
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
18,326 |
|
|
|
18,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
46,722 |
|
|
|
52,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities not subject to compromise
|
|
|
136,483 |
|
|
|
180,646 |
|
LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE
|
|
|
1,272,609 |
|
|
|
1,170,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,409,092 |
|
|
|
1,351,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEMBERS DEFICIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In Capital
|
|
|
234,800 |
|
|
|
234,800 |
|
|
Members investment (52,802 units authorized)
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(3,683 |
) |
|
|
(3,683 |
) |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,270,111 |
) |
|
|
(1,175,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total members deficit
|
|
|
(1,038,794 |
) |
|
|
(944,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members deficit
|
|
$ |
370,298 |
|
|
$ |
407,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements.
F-38
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the period January 1, 2004 to September 30,
2004,
the Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period
May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002
to May 9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Companies | |
|
Companies | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
Period from | |
|
|
January 1, 2004 to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
May 10, 2002 to | |
|
January 1, 2002 to | |
|
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
December 31, 2002 | |
|
May 9, 2002 | |
| |
REVENUES (including amounts to related parties of $3,061 in the
Predecessor period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal Sales revenues
|
|
$ |
346,981 |
|
|
$ |
441,291 |
|
|
$ |
264,235 |
|
|
$ |
136,040 |
|
|
Freight and handling revenues
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
6,032 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
22,702 |
|
|
|
31,771 |
|
|
|
27,397 |
|
|
|
21,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
373,383 |
|
|
|
481,070 |
|
|
|
297,664 |
|
|
|
160,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
6,032 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
Cost of coal sales and other revenues (including amounts to
related parties of $9,116 in the Predecessor period) (exclusive
of items shown separately below)
|
|
|
306,429 |
|
|
|
400,652 |
|
|
|
251,361 |
|
|
|
114,767 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
27,547 |
|
|
|
52,254 |
|
|
|
40,033 |
|
|
|
32,316 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative (including amounts to
related parties of $3 in the Predecessor period) (exclusive of
depreciation and amortization shown separately above)
|
|
|
8,477 |
|
|
|
23,350 |
|
|
|
16,695 |
|
|
|
9,677 |
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(4,320 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
Writedowns and special items
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
729,953 |
|
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
355,945 |
|
|
|
489,044 |
|
|
|
1,044,035 |
|
|
|
167,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from operations
|
|
|
17,438 |
|
|
|
(7,974 |
) |
|
|
(746,371 |
) |
|
|
(7,767 |
) |
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(114,211 |
) |
|
|
(145,892 |
) |
|
|
(80,405 |
) |
|
|
(36,666 |
) |
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
(52,784 |
) |
|
|
(143,663 |
) |
|
|
1,567,689 |
|
|
Other, net (including amounts to related parties of $93 in the
Predecessor period)
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other income (expense)
|
|
|
(111,903 |
) |
|
|
(198,489 |
) |
|
|
(222,812 |
) |
|
|
1,531,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
(94,465 |
) |
|
$ |
(206,463 |
) |
|
$ |
(969,183 |
) |
|
$ |
1,523,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements.
F-39
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS DEFICIT
For the Period January 1, 2004 to September 30,
2004,
the Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period
May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002
to May 9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members | |
|
Paid-in | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Investment | |
|
Capital | |
|
Loss | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Total | |
| |
PREDECESSOR COMPANIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BalanceJanuary 1, 2002
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
163,913 |
|
|
$ |
(7,720 |
) |
|
|
$(878,508 |
) |
|
$ |
(722,262 |
) |
|
January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002, net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,523,755 |
|
|
|
1,523,755 |
|
|
Fresh-start accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
71,087 |
|
|
|
7,720 |
|
|
|
(645,247 |
) |
|
|
(566,493 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BalanceMay 9, 2002 after fresh start adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
REORGANIZED COMPANIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance-May 10, 2002
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
234,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002, net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(969,183 |
) |
|
|
(969,183 |
) |
|
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCEDecember 31, 2002
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
234,800 |
|
|
|
(3,824 |
) |
|
|
(969,183 |
) |
|
|
(738,007 |
) |
January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003, net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206,463 |
) |
|
|
(206,463 |
) |
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance- December 31, 2003
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
234,800 |
|
|
|
(3,683 |
) |
|
|
(1,175,646 |
) |
|
|
(944,329 |
) |
January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004, net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94,465 |
) |
|
|
(94,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCESeptember 30, 2004
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
234,800 |
|
|
$ |
(3,683 |
) |
|
|
$(1,270,111 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,038,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements.
F-40
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Period January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003 and the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and for the period January 1, 2002 to
May 9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized Companies | |
|
Predecessor Companies | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Period from | |
|
For the | |
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2004 | |
|
year ended | |
|
May 10, 2002 to | |
|
Period from | |
|
|
to September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, 2002 to | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
May 9, 2002 | |
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(94,465 |
) |
|
$ |
(206,463 |
) |
|
$ |
(969,183 |
) |
|
$ |
1,523,755 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
27,547 |
|
|
|
52,254 |
|
|
|
40,033 |
|
|
|
32,316 |
|
|
|
Depreciation Allocation from Affiliates
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
4,118 |
|
|
|
4,930 |
|
|
|
5,723 |
|
|
|
Amortization of finance costs included in interest expense
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
3,698 |
|
|
|
5,644 |
|
|
|
5,676 |
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(4,320 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
Gain on lease buyout
|
|
|
7,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh start revaluation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(645,824 |
) |
|
|
Fresh start adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(801,495 |
) |
|
|
Gain on debt extinguishment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161,584 |
) |
|
|
Writedowns and special items
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
729,953 |
|
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
6,594 |
|
|
|
Writeoff of net payables to other Horizon subsidiaries
|
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
|
|
(5,432 |
) |
|
|
188,282 |
|
|
|
(264,621 |
) |
Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(10,706 |
) |
|
|
18,616 |
|
|
|
(11,419 |
) |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(4,242 |
) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
2,806 |
|
|
|
(37,197 |
) |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
7,971 |
|
|
|
19,374 |
|
|
|
64,809 |
|
|
|
(17,032 |
) |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
(2,313 |
) |
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
10,666 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
9,754 |
|
|
|
(4,912 |
) |
|
|
24,703 |
|
|
|
(12,782 |
) |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
85,520 |
|
|
|
150,144 |
|
|
|
32,388 |
|
|
|
87,079 |
|
|
|
Reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
(4,007 |
) |
|
|
(11,942 |
) |
|
|
(31,957 |
) |
|
|
(23,060 |
) |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(5,552 |
) |
|
|
(8,924 |
) |
|
|
(15,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
128,522 |
|
|
|
224,216 |
|
|
|
1,045,555 |
|
|
|
(1,821,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
34,057 |
|
|
|
17,753 |
|
|
|
76,372 |
|
|
|
(298,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of assets
|
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
15,388 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment and mine development
|
|
|
(6,624 |
) |
|
|
(16,937 |
) |
|
|
(13,435 |
) |
|
|
(10,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,535 |
) |
|
|
(1,549 |
) |
|
|
(12,799 |
) |
|
|
(10,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(4,698 |
) |
|
|
(13,729 |
) |
|
|
(183,162 |
) |
|
|
(304,449 |
) |
|
Borrowings on long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,003 |
|
|
|
574,700 |
|
|
Net borrowings/(repayments) on debtor-in-possession financing
|
|
|
(27,080 |
) |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
56,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,238 |
) |
|
Repayments on capital leases
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(993 |
) |
|
|
(893 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(32,381 |
) |
|
|
(15,459 |
) |
|
|
(78,025 |
) |
|
|
259,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
(14,452 |
) |
|
|
(50,026 |
) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
14,566 |
|
|
|
64,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
14,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to combined financial statements.
F-41
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
1. |
ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
Horizon NR, LLC (HNR) is a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Horizon Natural Resources Company. HNR has seventy-five
direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, seventeen of
which are included in the accompanying combined financial
statements. HNR and the seventeen subsidiaries are referred to
as the Combined Companies in the accompanying
combined financial statements and related footnotes. The
seventeen subsidiaries included are: Appalachian Realty Company,
Ayrshire Land Company, Bluegrass Coal Development Company,
Evergreen Mining Company, Fairview Land Company, LLC, Horizon
Natural Resources Sales Company, Leslie Resources, Inc.
(exclusive of Chaives Job), Leslie Resources Management, Inc.,
Sunny Ridge Enterprises, Inc., Sunny Ridge Mining Company, Inc.
(exclusive of Job 10), Turris Coal Company, Ikerd-Bandy
Co., Inc., Shipyard River Coal Terminal Company, Franklin Coal
Sales Company, Kentucky Prince Mining Company, RP Terminal, LLC,
and Mining Technologies, Inc.
Horizon, formerly known as AEI Resources Holding, Inc.
(AEI), operated a coal mining business through its
subsidiaries in the United States. As discussed in Note 2,
on November 13, 2002 and November 14, 2002, Horizon
filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the
Bankruptcy Code) in the United States Bankruptcy
Court (the Bankruptcy Court). Horizon completed its
November 2002 bankruptcy proceedings on September 30, 2004
through the sale or transfer of certain properties, assets and
liabilities to International Coal Group, Inc. (ICG)
and others. Horizon had previously filed a voluntary petition
for reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code accompanied by a
prepackaged plan of reorganization on February 28, 2002.
Horizons first bankruptcy Plan of Reorganization became
effective May 9, 2002 (see note 4).
The combined financial statements as of September 30, 2004,
for the period January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004,
as of December 31, 2003 and for the year then ended, and
the periods May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002 and
January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002 are carve-out financial
statements reflecting the operations and financial condition of
the Horizon properties acquired by ICG on September 30,
2004.
Throughout the notes to the combined financial statements, the
term Predecessor Companies refers to the Combined
Companies, their operations and their cash flows for the period
from January 1, 2002 through May 9, 2002, while the
term Reorganized Companies refers to the Combined
Companies, their operations and their cash flows for periods
thereafter.
These combined financial statements were prepared from the
separate accounts and records maintained by the Combined
Companies and are not necessarily indicative of the conditions
that would have existed or the results of operations if the
Combined Companies had been operated as unaffiliated
F-42
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
entities. Certain assets and expense items represent allocations
from Horizon. The accounts allocated, amount, and basis of
allocation are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon Amounts | |
|
|
| |
Account |
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
| |
Vendor Advances
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
691 |
|
Reclamation Deposits
|
|
|
52,706 |
|
|
|
54,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts allocated to | |
|
|
|
|
Combined Companies | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
Basis of Allocation | |
| |
Vendor Advances
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
|
Coal Production Tons |
|
Reclamation Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
Premiums Paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon Amounts | |
|
|
| |
|
|
January 1, 2004- | |
|
January 1, 2003- | |
|
May 10, 2002- | |
|
January 1, 2002- | |
|
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
December 31, 2002 | |
|
May 9, 2002 | |
| |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
$ |
17,100 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,541 |
|
|
$ |
20,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts allocated to | |
|
|
|
|
Combined Companies | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2004- | |
|
January 1, 2003- | |
|
May 10, 2002- | |
|
January 1, 2002- | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
December 31, 2002 | |
|
May 9, 2002 | |
|
Basis of Allocation | |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
$ |
9,081 |
|
|
$ |
9,860 |
|
|
$ |
4,974 |
|
|
$ |
8,305 |
|
|
Estimated Hours Worked |
Vendor advances were allocated to the Combined Companies using a
formula based on the ratio of actual coal production tons for
the Combined Companies compared to the actual coal production
tons for Horizon. Reclamation deposits were allocated to the
Combined Companies using a formula based on the ratio of
reclamation premiums paid for the Combined Companies compared to
reclamation premiums paid for Horizon. Selling, general and
administrative expenses were allocated to the Combined Companies
using a formula based on the ratio of estimated hours worked for
the Combined Companies compared to the estimated hours worked
for Horizon.
The combined financial statements also include the entire amount
owed through the DIP Facility and Senior Secured Notes (see
Note 8) as these borrowings and related accrued interest
were the legal obligations of the Combined Companies.
The Combined Companies financial statements have been
presented on the basis that they are a going concern, which
contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of
liabilities in the normal course of business. The Combined
Companies recurring losses from operations, the related
bankruptcy filing, the maturity of their debt obligations in
2004 and the Combined Companies defaults under their
various debt covenants raise substantial doubt about the
Combined Companies ability to
F-43
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
continue as a going concern. The combined financial statements
do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability
and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and
classification of liabilities that might result should the
Combined Companies be unable to continue as a going concern.
Realization of the carrying amounts of the Combined
Companies assets and satisfaction of their liabilities is
dependent upon, among other things, the ability to comply with
their debtor-in-possession financing agreement, the ability to
refinance or extend the 2004 debt obligations and the ability to
generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet their
obligations. The Combined Companies operating plan
includes actions they believe will improve operating profits and
cash flows. There can be no assurances that operating profits
and cash flows will be realized in an amount sufficient to fund
obligations or other liquidity needs.
Since filing for protection under the Bankruptcy Code on
November 13, 2002 and November 14, 2002 (see
Note 2), Horizon has operated its business as a
debtor-in-possession subject to the jurisdiction of the
Bankruptcy Court. Accordingly, the combined financial statements
of the Combined Companies have been prepared in accordance with
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement
of Position 90-7, Financial Reporting by Entities in
Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code
(SOP 90-7) and generally accepted
accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which
assume that assets will be realized and liabilities will be
discharged in the normal course of business.
The Combined Companies operate one segment: the production of
steam coal from surface and deep mines in Kentucky, West
Virginia and Illinois.
Fresh-Start Accounting On May 9, 2002,
Horizon emerged from Chapter 11 upon approval of their
Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization (see Note 2). Horizon
has accounted for all transactions related to that
reorganization in accordance with SOP 90-7 (see
Note 2). The adjustments to reflect the Combined
Companies emergence from bankruptcy have been reflected in
the accompanying combined financial statements. Accordingly, a
vertical black line is shown in the combined statements of
operations and combined statements of cash flows to separate
post-emergence operations from those prior to May 10, 2002,
since they have not been prepared on a comparable basis.
|
|
2. |
LIQUIDITY AND BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS |
Chapter 11 Reorganization On
November 13, 2002 and November 14, 2002, Horizon filed
voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code. On September 30, 2004, in connection
with the completion of Horizons bankruptcy proceedings,
ICG acquired certain properties and assets, and assumed certain
liabilities of Horizon through Section 363 asset sales of
the United States Bankruptcy Court.
The Combined Companies reorganization and administrative
expenses (primarily legal and consulting expenses) related to
the Chapter 11 proceedings have been separately identified
in the combined statements of operations as reorganization items.
In accordance with SOP 90-7, the accompanying combined
balance sheets as of September 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, segregate liabilities subject to
compromise, such as unsecured claims, from
F-44
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
liabilities not subject to compromise and liabilities arising
subsequent to filing bankruptcy. Liabilities subject to
compromise for the Combined Companies are set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
915,304 |
|
|
$ |
915,304 |
|
Accrued postretirement medical benefits
|
|
|
59,578 |
|
|
|
56,633 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
22,652 |
|
|
|
23,872 |
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
275,075 |
|
|
|
174,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,272,609 |
|
|
$ |
1,170,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon had previously filed a voluntary petition for
reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code accompanied by a
prepackaged plan of reorganization on February 28, 2002.
This plan of reorganization became effective May 9, 2002
(see note 4).
|
|
3. |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND GENERAL |
Basis of Presentation and Principles of
CombinationSignificant intercompany transactions
and balances have been eliminated in combination. Minority
interests have not been recorded due to insignificance or
deficit equity. Investments in 20% to 50% owned entities are
accounted for under the equity method and are not significant.
Company Risk FactorsThe Combined Companies
are exposed to risks associated with the bankruptcy proceedings
and risks associated with a highly leveraged organization. Such
risks include: increased vulnerability to adverse economic and
industry conditions, limited ability to fund future working
capital, capital expenditures, business acquisitions or other
corporate requirements, and possible liquidity problems, as well
as financing and credit constraints (see Note 2).
Bankruptcy AccountingIn preparing the
accompanying combined financial statements, the Combined
Companies applied the provisions of SOP 90-7, which does not
significantly change the application of accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America; however, it
does require that the combined financial statements for periods
including and subsequent to filing the Chapter 11 petition
distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated
with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the
business (see Note 4).
Cash and Cash EquivalentsThe Combined
Companies consider all highly liquid debt instruments with
original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
Trade Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful
AccountsTrade accounts receivable are recorded at
the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for
doubtful accounts is the Combined Companies best estimate
of the amount of probable credit losses in the Combined
Companies existing accounts receivable. The Combined
Companies establish provisions for losses on accounts receivable
when it is probable that all or part of the outstanding balance
will not be collected. The Combined Companies regularly review
collectibility and establish or adjust the allowance as
necessary using the specific identification method. The Combined
Companies do not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure
related to its customers.
F-45
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
InventoriesInventories are stated at lower
of average cost or market. Components of inventories consist of
coal and parts and supplies, net of allowance for obsolescence
(see Note 5). Coal inventories represent coal contained in
stockpiles and exposed in the pit.
Advance RoyaltiesThe Combined Companies are
required, under certain royalty lease agreements, to make
minimum royalty payments whether or not mining activity is being
performed on the leased property. These minimum payments may be
recoupable once mining begins on the leased property. The
recoupable minimum royalty payments are capitalized and
amortized based on the units-of-production method at a rate
defined in the lease agreement once mining activities begin.
Unamortized deferred royalty costs are expensed when mining has
ceased or a decision is made not to mine on such property. The
Combined Companies have recorded advance royalties of $12,284
($1,783 in prepaid expense and other and $10,501 included in
non-current assets) at September 30, 2004 and $12,429
($2,453 in prepaid expense and other and $9,976 included in
non-current assets) at December 31, 2003.
Property, Plant and EquipmentProperty, plant
and equipment, including coal reserves and mine development
costs are recorded at cost, which includes construction overhead
and interest, where applicable. Expenditures for major renewals
and betterments are capitalized while expenditures for
maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Coal reserve
costs are depleted using the units-of-production method, based
on estimated recoverable interest. Mine development costs are
amortized using the units-of-production method, based on
estimated recoverable interest. Other property, plant and
equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method with
estimated useful lives substantially as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years | |
|
Buildings
|
|
10 to 45 |
Mining and other equipment and related facilities
|
|
1 to 20 |
Land improvements
|
|
15 |
Transportation equipment
|
|
2 to 7 |
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
3 to 10 |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense for property,
plant and equipment for the Combined Companies for the period
January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004, excluding
depreciation allocated from affiliates, was $27,547 and year
ended 2003 was $52,254. For the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002 and January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002
depreciation expense was $40,033 and $32,316 respectively.
Debt Issuance CostsDebt issuance costs
reflect fees incurred to obtain financing. Debt issuance costs
are amortized (included in interest expense) using the effective
interest method, over the life of the related debt. Amortization
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the
year ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002
to December 31, 2002 and period January 1, 2002 to
May 9, 2002 was $1,437, $3,698, $11,282 and $5,676
respectively.
Restricted CashIncluded in other non-current
assets as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
is restricted cash of $4,361 and $2,597, respectively.
Restricted cash includes amounts required by various royalty and
reclamation agreements. Certain of these agreements have been
disputed by
F-46
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
third parties, requiring that cash be paid into an escrow
account until the rightful recipient is determined.
Coal Mine Reclamation and Mine Closure
CostsFuture cost requirements for land reclamation
are estimated where surface and deep mining operations have been
conducted, based on the Combined Companies interpretation
of the technical standards of regulations enacted by the U.S.
Office of Surface Mining, as well as state regulations. These
costs relate to reclaiming the pit and support acreage at
surface mines and sealing portals at deep mines. Other costs
common to both types of mining are related to reclaiming refuse
and slurry ponds as well as holding and related termination/exit
costs.
The Combined Companies early adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations as a result
of fresh-start accounting on May 9, 2002.
SFAS No. 143 addresses asset retirement obligations
that result from the acquisition, construction or normal
operation of long-lived assets. It requires companies to
recognize asset retirement obligations at fair value when the
liability is incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability,
that cost should be capitalized as part of the related
long-lived asset and allocated to expense over the useful life
of the asset. The asset retirement costs are recorded in coal
reserves.
During the Predecessor period, the Combined Companies accrued
the cost of final mine closure and related exit costs over the
estimated useful mining life of the developed property or, if
purchased, at the date of acquisition.
The Combined Companies expense reclamation performed prior to
final mine closure. The establishment of the end of mine
reclamation and closure liability is based upon permit
requirements and requires significant estimates and assumptions,
principally associated with regulatory requirements, costs and
recoverable coal reserves. Annually, the end of mine reclamation
and closure liability is reviewed and necessary adjustments are
made, including adjustments due to mine plan and permit changes
and revisions to cost and production levels to optimize mining
and reclamation efficiency. The amount of such adjustments is
reflected in the SFAS No. 143 year-end calculation.
Asset Impairments and Accelerated Mine Closing
AccrualsThe Combined Companies follow
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which requires that projected
future cash flows from use and disposition of assets be compared
with the carrying amounts of those assets. When the sum of
projected cash flows is less than the carrying amount,
impairment losses are recognized. In determining such impairment
losses, discounted cash flows are utilized to determine the fair
value of the assets being evaluated. Also, in certain
situations, expected mine lives are shortened because of changes
to planned operations. When that occurs and it is determined
that the mines underlying costs are not recoverable in the
future, reclamation and mine closing obligations are accelerated
and the mine closing accrual is increased accordingly. To the
extent it is determined asset carrying values will not be
recoverable during a shorter mine life, a provision for such
impairment is recognized.
Income Tax ProvisionThe provision for income
taxes includes federal, state and local income taxes currently
payable and deferred taxes arising from temporary differences
between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and
liabilities. Income taxes are recorded under the liability
method.
F-47
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the
estimated future tax effects of differences between the tax
basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting
amounts as well as net operating loss carryforwards and tax
credits based on enacted tax laws. Valuation allowances are
established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amount expected to be realized.
The Combined Companies file a consolidated federal income tax
return that includes other subsidiaries of Horizon Natural
Resources Company. Consolidated net operating losses are
allocated to the various subsidiaries in accordance with IRS
regulations and may not reflect actual losses incurred by the
Combined Companies on a stand alone basis.
Revenue RecognitionMost revenues result from
sales under long-term sales contracts with electric utilities,
industrial companies or other coal-consuming organizations,
primarily in the eastern United States. Revenues are recognized
on coal sales in accordance with the terms of the sales
agreement, which is usually when the coal is shipped to the
customers and title has passed.
Freight and handling costs paid directly to third-party carriers
and invoiced to coal customers are recorded as freight and
handling costs and freight and handling revenues, respectively.
Other revenues generally consist of equipment and parts sales,
equipment rebuild and maintenance services, coal handling and
processing, royalties, commissions on coal trades, contract
mining and rental income. These revenues are recognized in the
period earned or when the service is completed. Advance payments
received are deferred and recognized in revenue as coal is
shipped or rentals are earned.
Postretirement Benefits Other Than
PensionsAs prescribed by SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
Than Pensions, accruals are made, based on annual outside
actuarial valuations, for the expected costs of providing
postretirement benefits other than pensions, which are primarily
medical benefits, during an employees actual working
career.
The Combined Companies account for health care and life
insurance benefits provided for future retired employees and
their dependents by accruing the cost of such benefits over the
service lives of employees. Unrecognized actuarial gains and
losses are amortized over the estimated average remaining
service period for active employees and over the estimated
average remaining life for retirees.
Workers Compensation and Black Lung
BenefitsCertain of the Combined Companies are
liable under federal and state laws to pay workers
compensation and pneumoconiosis (black lung) benefits to
eligible employees, former employees and their dependents. The
Combined Companies were formerly self-insured for significant
federal and state workers compensation and black lung
benefits. The Combined Companies currently utilize a combination
of a large deductible insurance program, self-insurance and
state workers compensation fund participation to secure
its on-going obligations depending on the location of the
operation. The Combined Companies accrue for their workers
compensation and black lung obligations on a present value basis
determined by outside actuaries.
Managements Use of EstimatesThe
preparation of the combined financial statements in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
F-48
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
expenses during the reporting period. Significant items subject
to such estimates and assumptions include the allowance for
doubtful accounts; inventories; coal reserves; asset retirement
obligations; employee benefit liabilities; future cash flows
associated with assets; useful lives for depreciation, depletion
and amortization; workers compensation claims;
postretirement benefits other than pensions; income taxes; and
fair value of financial instruments. Due to the subjective
nature of these estimates, actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Statements of Cash Flows
Supplemental disclosure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized Companies | |
|
|
| |
|
|
January 1, 2004 to | |
|
Year ended | |
|
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
| |
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
9,268 |
|
|
$ |
7,797 |
|
Income taxes paid (refunded)
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized Companies | |
|
Predecessor Companies | |
|
|
May 10, 2002 to | |
|
January 1, 2002 to | |
|
|
December 31, 2002 | |
|
May 9, 2002 | |
| |
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
20,405 |
|
|
$ |
150,502 |
|
Income taxes paid (refunded)
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Non-cash transactions excluded from the December 31, 2003
Combined Statement of Cash Flows are comprised of a non-cash
settlement involving the exchange of accrued expenses of $1,652
for accounts receivables of $1,652 and prepaid insurance
financing through the issuance of current debt obligations of
$13,927. Non cash transactions excluded from the January 1,
2004 to September 30, 2004, the December 31, 2003, the
May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002 and the
January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002 Combined Statements of
Cash Flows are comprised of $0, $205, $3,127 and $0,
respectively, of additions to property, plant and equipment
through the incurrence of capital lease obligations.
Comprehensive Income or LossUnder generally
accepted accounting principals other comprehensive income or
loss can include, among other items, foreign currency items,
minimum pension liability adjustments and unrealized gains and
losses on certain investments in debt and equity securities. The
Combined Companies recorded minimum pension liability
adjustments of $0, $141, ($3,824) and $0 in Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss) in members deficit as of September 30,
2004, December 31, 2003, December 31, 2002 and
May 9, 2002 respectively, to properly record the pension
liability in accordance with actuarial calculations. The
Combined Companies had no other items of Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss).
|
|
4. |
FRESH-START ACCOUNTING |
On May 9, 2002, Horizon emerged from Chapter 11 upon
approval of their Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization. The
Combined Companies have accounted for all transactions related
to that reorganization in accordance with SOP 90-7. The
adjustments to reflect the emergence from bankruptcy have been
reflected in the accompanying combined financial statements.
Accordingly, a vertical black line is shown in the combined
statements of operations and combined statements of cash
F-49
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
flows to separate post-emergence operations from those prior to
May 10, 2002, since they have not been prepared on a
comparable basis.
As required by SOP 90-7, the provisions of fresh-start
accounting were applied as of May 9, 2002. In adopting
fresh-start accounting, an independent financial advisor was
engaged to assist in the fair value estimate of the reorganized
entity. The valuation model is based on comparable company
analysis and discontinued future cash flows.
The reorganized value of the Combined Companies prior to the
confirmation date was less than the total of all post-petition
liabilities and allowed claims as reflected in the following
summary:
|
|
|
|
|
Post-petition liabilities
|
|
$ |
1,281,218 |
|
Liabilities subject to compromise
|
|
|
436,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total post-petition liabilities and allowed claims
|
|
|
1,717,473 |
|
Reorganization value
|
|
|
1,521,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of liabilities over reorganization value
|
|
$ |
196,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromiseThe
Predecessor Companies eliminated $436,255 of liabilities subject
to compromise in exchange for equity valued at $235,000. These
liabilities subject to compromise included the following debt
instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued | |
|
|
|
|
Debt | |
|
Interest | |
|
Total | |
| |
10.5% Senior Notes
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,177 |
|
|
$ |
248,177 |
|
11.5% Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
38,078 |
|
|
|
188,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities Subject to Compromise
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
86,255 |
|
|
$ |
436,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The elimination of these liabilities subject to compromise
resulted in recognition of a gain on cancellation of debt
totaling $161,584 (see table below), which has been reflected in
reorganization items in the combined statement of operations of
the Predecessor Companies for the period from January 1,
2002 to May 9, 2002.
The Combined Companies refinanced their old secured bank debt
and repaid its entire outstanding balance, including all
outstanding interest and exit fees. The old secured bank debt
was replaced by three debt instruments: $47,349 draw on the
$250,000 Exit Facility, $475,000 Senior Secured Term Notes and
$450,000 Senior Secured Notes.
The impact of the debt restructuring entries is reflected below.
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise
|
|
$ |
436,255 |
|
Unamortized financing costs associated with retired debt
|
|
|
(39,671 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,584 |
|
New equity
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on debt extinguishment
|
|
$ |
161,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-50
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
Reorganization items reflected in the Predecessor Companies
operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on fresh-start revaluation
|
|
$ |
645,824 |
|
Gain on debt extinguishment
|
|
|
161,584 |
|
Write-off amounts payable to other subsidiaries of Horizon
|
|
|
779,789 |
|
Professional fees incurred during bankruptcy proceedings
|
|
|
(19,508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reorganization items
|
|
$ |
1,567,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
The following reflects the impact of fresh-start accounting on
the balance sheet as of May 9, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet at May 9, 2002 (Unaudited) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Fresh Start | |
|
|
|
|
AEI | |
|
| |
|
Horizon | |
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Debt | |
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Companies | |
|
Restructuring | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Companies | |
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
14,566 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,566 |
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
72,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,712 |
|
|
Accounts receivablenet
|
|
|
47,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,697 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
53,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,020 |
) |
|
|
24,089 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
25,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,241 |
|
|
|
42,511 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
12,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
12,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
226,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,950 |
) |
|
|
214,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING COAL RESERVES, MINE
DEVELOPMENT AND CONTRACT COSTSnet
|
|
|
427,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,187 |
) |
|
|
393,246 |
|
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697,063 |
|
|
|
697,063 |
|
NET RECEIVABLE FROM OTHER HORIZON SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
191,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,360 |
|
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTSnet
|
|
|
50,450 |
|
|
|
(39,671 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,779 |
|
OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
14,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
910,065 |
|
|
$ |
(39,671 |
) |
|
$ |
650,926 |
|
|
$ |
1,521,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
16,876 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,876 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
875,565 |
|
|
|
(755,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,632 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
194,414 |
|
|
|
(157,250 |
) |
|
|
4,553 |
|
|
|
41,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,086,855 |
|
|
|
(913,183 |
) |
|
|
4,553 |
|
|
|
178,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES, less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
19,923 |
|
|
|
913,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
933,106 |
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
57,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,035 |
|
|
Reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
64,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,157 |
) |
|
|
42,546 |
|
|
Deferred non-current liabilities
|
|
|
25,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,241 |
|
|
|
42,511 |
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
27,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,465 |
|
|
|
32,897 |
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise
|
|
|
436,255 |
|
|
|
(436,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,717,473 |
|
|
|
(436,255 |
) |
|
|
5,102 |
|
|
|
1,286,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEMBERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
(963,655 |
) |
|
|
161,584 |
|
|
|
802,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other members equity (deficit)
|
|
|
156,247 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
(156,247 |
) |
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members equity (deficit)
|
|
$ |
910,065 |
|
|
$ |
(39,671 |
) |
|
$ |
650,926 |
|
|
$ |
1,521,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-52
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
The nature of the more significant fresh-start adjustments is
discussed in further detail below:
InventoryThe inventory adjustments reflect
three items:
|
|
|
|
4 |
$1,453 write-up of stockpile inventory to market. |
|
|
4 |
Reclassification to development costs of deferred overburden
($29,229), where it will be amortized based on the
units-of-production method. |
|
|
4 |
Adjustment to decrease parts and supplies ($1,244) to estimated
market value. |
Deferred income taxesReflects gross up of
current deferred tax asset and long-term deferred tax liability
to reflect fresh-start accounting.
Property, plant and equipment, including coal reserves,
mine development and contract costs, net
The following adjustments, among others, were made:
|
|
|
|
4 |
The property, plant and equipment were valued at net book value,
which approximates the fair market value. |
|
|
4 |
Coal reserves were decreased $65,178 to reflect an independent
valuation assessment. The interests were valued on a discounted
royalty approach, which considered the current net royalty value
of both leased and owned interest. The relevant royalty revenue
streams were projected into the future based on budgeted
production and discounted back to generate the coal reserve
value. |
|
|
4 |
Development cost was increased $29,229 to reflect the
reclassification of deferred overburden (see inventory section
above). |
|
|
4 |
Contract costs were decreased $30,105 to reflect the current
market value of existing sales contracts. |
|
|
4 |
Asset retirement costs of $31,867 were recorded to reflect
adoption of SFAS No. 143 (Note 3). |
GoodwillThe Combined Companies engaged an
independent financial advisor to assist in the fair value
estimate of the reorganized entity prior to the confirmation
date. The amount of reorganized value in excess of the fair
market value of identifiable assets is included in this account.
SFAS No. 142 was applied to test for impairment.
Accrued expenses and otherConsists primarily
of lease loss reserves of $3,108 recorded to capture future
expected payments on equipment and royalty leases related to
non-productive properties due to change in management of the
Combined Companies. An additional $5,292 is included in
non-current liabilities.
Reclamation and mine closure costsReflects
adoption of SFAS No. 143 (Note 3). The discounting of
future expected mine closure and related exit costs caused a
decrease of $20,838. The Predecessor Companies had followed a
different reclamation policy by which it accrued on an
undiscounted basis for the cost of final mine closure and exit
costs over the estimated useful mining life of the developed
property or, if purchased, at the date of acquisition.
Additionally, $1,319 was reclassified to current accrued
reclamation.
F-53
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
Coal
|
|
$ |
8,717 |
|
|
$ |
5,478 |
|
Parts and supplies, net of allowance of $2,797 and $2,803
|
|
|
9,004 |
|
|
|
8,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,721 |
|
|
$ |
13,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
property, plant and equipment, including coal reserves, mine
development and contract costs, are summarized by major
classification as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
Land and land improvements
|
|
$ |
17,084 |
|
|
$ |
17,420 |
|
Mining and other equipment and related facilities
|
|
|
137,720 |
|
|
|
144,601 |
|
Mine development and contract costs
|
|
|
50,151 |
|
|
|
44,907 |
|
Coal reserves
|
|
|
186,420 |
|
|
|
202,240 |
|
Mine development in process
|
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
4,139 |
|
Construction work in process
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395,699 |
|
|
|
415,423 |
|
Less-accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(119,542 |
) |
|
|
(96,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
$ |
276,157 |
|
|
$ |
318,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in property, plant and equipment is $4,324 and $6,255
as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003,
respectively, related to development and construction projects
for which depreciation, depletion and amortization have not yet
commenced. Realization of these projects is reviewed on a
periodic basis.
|
|
7. |
ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER |
As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 accrued
expenses and other consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
Payroll, bonus and vacation expense
|
|
$ |
15,247 |
|
|
$ |
13,742 |
|
Non-income taxes
|
|
|
7,065 |
|
|
|
7,369 |
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747 |
|
Other
|
|
|
5,665 |
|
|
|
6,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,977 |
|
|
$ |
27,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
8. DEBT
As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 debt
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
DIP Facility
|
|
$ |
30,016 |
|
|
$ |
57,096 |
|
Senior Secured Term Notes
|
|
|
465,000 |
|
|
|
465,000 |
|
Senior Secured Notes
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
Capital leases (Note 12)
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
Other
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
945,936 |
|
|
|
978,317 |
|
Lesslong-term debt subject to compromise
|
|
|
915,304 |
|
|
|
915,304 |
|
Lesscurrent portion of long-term debt and capital leases
not subject to compromise
|
|
|
30,603 |
|
|
|
62,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debtor-In-Possession FacilityThe Debtor in
Possession (DIP) Facility provides revolving loans
and letters of credit (with a sub-limit on the issuance of
letters of credit) comprised of Tranche A DIP Loans and
Tranche B DIP Letters of Credit and Credit-Linked Deposits
with $125,000 and $150,000 originally available, respectively.
The DIP Facility could have been increased to $350,000 if
certain requirements had been met: (1) an additional
$25,000 draw down capacity under the DIP Facility if the lender
approved Horizons, including the Combined Companies,
five-year business plan and (2) an additional $50,000 draw
down capacity under the DIP Facility if the lender syndicated a
portion of the DIP Facility. However, these requirements were
not met, and the DIP Facility was not increased. The DIP
Facility agreement was amended as of June 30, 2004, and all
defaults were waived. The maturity date is October 15,
2004. In addition, the maturity date may be extended to
November 15, 2004, based on the sole discretion of the
lender. The DIP Facility has been reduced by proceeds from asset
sales, tax refunds and negotiations with the lender totaling
$79,858. On August 18, 2004, the lender decreased the
Combined Companies draw down capacity to $195,142.
Loans under the credit agreement bear interest, at the Combined
Companies option, at either a market base rate plus 4.5%
per year or at a market reserved adjusted Euro-dollar rate plus
5.5% per year. The DIP Facility is collateralized primarily by
capital stock of most of Horizons subsidiaries, along with
substantially all accounts receivable, inventory, property,
plant and equipment, intangible assets, contract rights and
other personal and real property of Horizon and most of its
subsidiaries, including the Combined Companies. As of
September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Combined
Companies had $5,805 and $23,320 available on this revolving
credit agreement, respectively, net of $159,851 and $155,688 in
letters of credit, respectively.
F-55
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 letters
of credit outstanding consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
Letters of Credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance/Workers compensation/Reclamation bonds
|
|
$ |
159,851 |
|
|
$ |
155,238 |
|
|
Coal reserves/Royalties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
159,851 |
|
|
$ |
155,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003,
borrowings under the DIP Facility bear interest at variable
rates ranging from 4.625% to 9.5%.
The DIP Facility and senior secured term notes contain customary
covenants including, without limitation, restrictions on
Horizons, including the Combined Companies, ability
to:
|
|
4 |
Incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends and make other
restricted payments and investments; |
|
4 |
Acquire or dispose of assets; |
|
4 |
Engage in transactions with affiliates; |
|
4 |
Merge, consolidate, or transfer substantially all of its assets. |
Horizon, including the Combined Companies, is also required to
maintain compliance with a minimum trailing consolidated
adjusted EBITDA covenant. Beginning December 2002, Horizon,
including the Combined Companies, was in violation of various
provisions of the DIP Facility. Horizon negotiated a waiver of
these events of default with the administrative agent as of
June 30, 2004.
Senior Secured NotesThe senior secured term
notes bear interest at a market base rate plus 4.25% per year
and mature on May 8, 2008. Principal payments of $5,000 per
quarter are due on these notes. As of September 30, 2004,
the interest rate is 9% plus an additional 2.0% penalty as
Horizon, including the Combined Companies, is in violation of
certain covenants.
The senior secured notes bear interest at the rate of 11.75% per
annum payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15
of each year with a final maturity date of May 8, 2009. As
of September 30, 2004 the interest rate is 11.75% plus an
additional 2.0% penalty as Horizon, including the Combined
Companies, is in violation of certain covenants.
The senior secured notes contain covenants similar to those of
the DIP Facility. As of September 30, 2004, Horizon,
including the Combined Companies, was in violation of various
financial and other covenants regarding the senior secured term
notes and senior secured notes including the non-payment of
principal and interest payments due giving rise to an Event of
Default. During the default period, Horizon, including the
Combined Companies, must pay or accrue an additional interest of
2.0% per year to the holders of such notes. The entire balance
of the senior secured notes is classified as liabilities subject
to compromise in the accompanying financial statements.
F-56
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
InterestAccrued interest at
September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 is $277,651
and $175,631 ($275,075 and $174,938 included in liabilities
subject to compromise), respectively. Horizon, including the
Combined Companies, has not made various interest payments due
as scheduled. However, accruals of amounts due are reflected in
the accompanying financial statements.
9. ASSET RETIREMENT
OBLIGATION
At September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 the
Combined Companies recorded asset retirement obligation accruals
for mine reclamation and closure costs totaling $23,642 and
$28,649, respectively.
The following schedule represents activity in the accrued
reclamation and closure cost obligation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized Companies | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2004 to | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2004 | |
| |
Beginning Balance
|
|
|
1/1/2004 |
|
|
|
28,649 |
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
1/1/2004-9/30/2004 |
|
|
|
(9,092 |
) |
Accretion
|
|
|
1/1/2004-9/30/2004 |
|
|
|
3,399 |
|
Allocation from other Horizon Subsidiaries
|
|
|
1/1/2004-9/30/2004 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized Companies | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
May 10, 2002 to | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
|
December 31, 2002 | |
| |
Beginning Balance
|
|
|
1/1/2003 |
|
|
$ |
35,765 |
|
|
|
5/9/2002 |
|
|
$ |
90,973 |
|
SFAS No. 143 adoption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,071 |
) |
Liability for new mining locations
|
|
|
1/1/2003-12/31/2003 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
1/1/2003-12/31/2003 |
|
|
|
(9,478 |
) |
|
|
5/10/2002-12/31/2002 |
|
|
|
(11,033 |
) |
Accretion
|
|
|
1/1/2003-12/31/2003 |
|
|
|
4,986 |
|
|
|
5/10/2002-12/31/2002 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
Allocation (to)/from other Horizon Subsidiaries
|
|
|
1/1/2003-12/31/2003 |
|
|
|
(2,852 |
) |
|
|
5/10/2002-12/31/2002 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-57
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
The accrued reclamation and closure cost obligations are
included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
Current portion of reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
Non-current reclamation and mine closure costs
|
|
|
22,436 |
|
|
|
27,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,642 |
|
|
$ |
28,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. INCOME TAXES
Because of the Combined Companies continuing losses, no
provision (benefit) for income taxes has been recorded in any
period presented.
The following table presents the difference between the actual
tax provision (benefit) and the amounts obtained by
applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to
income and losses before income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized Companies | |
|
|
| |
|
|
January 1, 2004 to | |
|
January 1, 2003 to | |
|
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
| |
Federal provision (benefit) computed at statutory rate
|
|
$ |
(33,063 |
) |
|
$ |
(72,263 |
) |
State income tax provision (benefit) (net of federal tax
benefits and apportionment factors) computed at statutory rate
|
|
|
(4,043 |
) |
|
|
(8,837 |
) |
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
37,608 |
|
|
|
85,741 |
|
Nondeductible items
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
(3,592 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
(787 |
) |
|
|
(1,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Companies | |
|
Companies | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
May 10, 2002 to | |
|
January 1, 2002 to | |
|
|
December 31, 2002 | |
|
May 9, 2002 | |
| |
Federal provision (benefit) computed at statutory rate
|
|
$ |
(339,214 |
) |
|
$ |
533,314 |
|
State income tax provision (benefit) (net of federal tax
benefits and apportionment factors) computed at statutory rate
|
|
|
(41,481 |
) |
|
|
65,217 |
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
49,930 |
|
|
|
(2,881 |
) |
Excess of purchase price over net assets acquired
|
|
|
524,533 |
|
|
|
(524,533 |
) |
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79,053 |
) |
Nondeductible items
|
|
|
(191,862 |
) |
|
|
9,297 |
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,906 |
) |
|
|
(1,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-58
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
Significant components of the Combined Companies deferred
tax assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued employee benefits
|
|
$ |
23,361 |
|
|
$ |
30,677 |
|
|
Accrued reclamation and closure
|
|
|
9,270 |
|
|
|
11,194 |
|
|
Reserve for losses
|
|
|
10,534 |
|
|
|
11,437 |
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
160,855 |
|
|
|
135,317 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,241 |
|
|
|
6,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,261 |
|
|
|
195,597 |
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(145,628 |
) |
|
|
(116,436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,633 |
|
|
|
79,161 |
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, coal reserves and mine development costs
|
|
|
64,538 |
|
|
|
78,943 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,633 |
|
|
|
79,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classified in balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$ |
5,931 |
|
|
$ |
6,020 |
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
$ |
5,931 |
|
|
$ |
6,020 |
|
In connection with fresh-start accounting, the Combined
Companies assets and liabilities were recorded at their
respective fair values. Deferred tax assets and liabilities were
then recognized for the differences between fair values and tax
basis. In addition, deferred tax assets were recognized for
future tax benefits of net operating loss carryforwards
(NOLs) and other tax attributes. A valuation
allowance has been provided for deferred tax assets because the
Combined Companies believe it was more likely than not
that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
In connection with the Plan of Reorganization effective
May 9, 2002, the Combined Companies realized a gain from
the cancellation of certain indebtedness (COI). This
gain was not taxable since the gain resulted from the
reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code. However, the Combined
Companies were required, as of the beginning of its 2003 taxable
year, to reduce their NOLs in an amount equal to such COI income.
Prior to October 1, 2004 The Combined Companies filed a
consolidated federal income tax return that included other
subsidiaries of Horizon Natural Resources Company. Consolidated
net operating losses were allocated to the various subsidiaries
in accordance with IRS regulations and may not reflect actual
losses incurred by the Combined Companies on a stand alone basis.
Based on such allocations and the reductions discussed above, at
December 31, 2003 the Combined Companies had NOLs and
alternative minimum tax (AMT) NOLs. Upon the sale to ICG
effective September 30, 2004, these NOLs are no longer
available due to a change in control.
F-59
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
Included in the valuation allowance at September 30, 2004,
December 31, 2003, and 2002 is $1,444, $1,444 and $1,500,
respectively, related to the deferred tax asset recognized by
the recording of the additional minimum pension liability in
other comprehensive loss (OCL) for the period from
May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002. Pursuant to
SFAS No. 109, if the tax asset that results from
recording pension liability through equity is fully reserved
with a valuation allowance, there is no net income tax expense
or benefit to be allocated to the OCL component of equity.
11. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Certain employees of the Combined Companies were eligible to
participate in defined benefit pension plans sponsored by
Horizon and receive other postretirement benefits. On
December 2, 2003, the Board of Directors of Horizon
approved the termination of the Horizon NR, LLC Employee Pension
Plan (Horizon Pension Plan). Effective
March 31, 2004, an employee who was not a participant in
the Plan on March 31, 2004, could not become a participant
in the Horizon Pension Plan. No employee should accrue any
additional pension credited service or days of service for any
period after March 31, 2004. Effective March 31, 2004
Horizon froze all future accrual of benefits under the Horizon
pension plan. On June 25, 2004 the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation announced that it would assume responsibility for
the pensions of more than 4,800 Horizon employees. Accordingly,
pension and other postretirement benefit information as of
September 30, 2004 and for the period January 1, 2004
to September 30, 2004 for these carve-out financial
statements is not applicable.
Employee benefits at September 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
Postretirement benefits
|
|
$ |
11,083 |
|
|
$ |
10,104 |
|
Workers compensation benefits
|
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
9,666 |
|
Black lung benefits
|
|
|
21,540 |
|
|
|
20,618 |
|
Pension benefits
|
|
|
16,640 |
|
|
|
16,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
59,578 |
|
|
|
56,633 |
|
Lesscurrent portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lessliabilities subject to compromise (Note 2)
|
|
|
59,578 |
|
|
|
56,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits under the plans were generally related to an
employees length of service and salary. Horizon allocated
pension expense and other postretirement benefit expense to the
Combined Companies based on actuarially determined amounts. The
amount of pension cost and other postretirement benefit cost
allocated to the Combined Companies was impacted by various
assumptions (discount rate, rate of return on plan assets, etc.)
that Horizon used in determining its pension and other
postretirement obligations. Pension expense allocated to the
Combined Companies totaled $388 for the period January 1,
2004 to September 30, 2004, $2,013 for the year ended
December 31, 2003, $3,235 for the period May 10, 2002
to December 31, 2002 and $508 for the period
January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002. Other postretirement
benefit expense allocated to the Combined Companies totaled
$1,450 for the period January 1, 2004 to September 30,
2004, $1,513 for the year ended December 31, 2003,
F-60
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
$1,024 for the period May 10, 2002 to December 31,
2002 and $583 for the period January 1, 2002 to
May 10, 2002.
Valuation DateAll actuarially determined
benefits were determined as of December 31, 2003.
Pension and Other Postretirement BenefitsThe
following pension and other postretirement benefit information
was prepared for Horizon and its seventy-six subsidiaries for
the year ended December 31, 2003.
In conjunction with certain 1998 and 1999 acquisitions, Horizon
acquired, or agreed to put in place, benefit plans providing
pension benefits to certain employees and postretirement
healthcare and life insurance to eligible employees, including
union employees.
During 1998, Horizon acquired a non-contributory defined benefit
pension plan covering all salaried and non-union employees of an
acquired company. Effective January 1, 1999, Horizon
amended and restated this plan to cover all salaried and
non-union employees of Horizon, including the employees of the
Combined Companies. Benefits are generally based on the
employees years of service and compensation during each
year of employment. Horizons funding policy is to make the
minimum payment required by the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
F-61
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
Summaries of the changes in the benefit obligations, plan assets
(consisting principally of common stocks, U.S. government and
corporate obligations and cash equivalents) and funded status of
the plan for 2003 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension | |
|
|
Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
| |
Changes in Benefit Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligations at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
92,594 |
|
|
Service costs
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
6,098 |
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
4,708 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(18,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$ |
87,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
49,693 |
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
7,537 |
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(18,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
$ |
41,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status of the Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated obligations less plan assets
|
|
$ |
(45,897 |
) |
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
15,247 |
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(10,660 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability recognized
|
|
$ |
(41,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
F-62
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
The expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets is
based on long-term historical return information and future
estimates of long-term investment returns for the target asset
allocation of investments that comprise plan assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
Postretirement | |
|
|
Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
| |
Changes in Benefit Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligations at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
501,061 |
|
|
Service costs
|
|
|
6,251 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
42,278 |
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
79,142 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(33,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$ |
594,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
33,975 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(33,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status of the Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated obligations less plan assets
|
|
$ |
(594,757 |
) |
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
142,494 |
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability recognized
|
|
$ |
(452,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Amounts recognized in the Combined Companies statements of
financial position consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
Pension | |
|
Postretirement | |
|
|
Benefits | |
|
Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
Accrued benefit cost included in liabilities subject to
compromise
|
|
$ |
(16,245 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,104 |
) |
Intangible assets
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
3,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$ |
(12,557 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-63
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
Net periodic benefit costs of Horizon and all of its
subsidiaries, including the Combined Companies were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Reorganized | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Companies | |
|
Companies | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
January 1, 2003 | |
|
May 10, 2002 to | |
|
January 1, 2002 | |
|
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
December 31, 2002 | |
|
to May 9, 2002 | |
| |
Net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
2,999 |
|
|
$ |
2,145 |
|
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
6,098 |
|
|
|
4,213 |
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
Settlement charge
|
|
|
2,184 |
|
|
|
3,821 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(5,468 |
) |
|
|
(4,812 |
) |
|
|
(2,631 |
) |
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit cost
|
|
$ |
5,762 |
|
|
$ |
5,542 |
|
|
$ |
941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Reorganized | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
Companies | |
|
Companies | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
January 1, 2003 | |
|
May 10, 2002 to | |
|
January 1, 2002 | |
|
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
December 31, 2002 | |
|
to May 9, 2002 | |
| |
Net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
6,251 |
|
|
$ |
4,253 |
|
|
$ |
1,758 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
42,278 |
|
|
|
20,132 |
|
|
|
11,004 |
|
|
Amortization ofActuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
(566 |
) |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit cost
|
|
$ |
49,426 |
|
|
$ |
23,819 |
|
|
$ |
12,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For measurement purposes, a 10% annual rate of increase in the
per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed,
gradually decreasing to 5% in 2010 and remaining level
thereafter.
Net periodic benefit cost is determined using the assumptions as
of the beginning of the year, and the funded status is
determined using the assumptions as of the end of the year.
The projected benefit obligations, accumulated benefit
obligations and fair value of plan assets for the Horizon
pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of
plan assets were $87,888, $83,809 and $41,991 as of
December 31, 2003, respectively.
The expense and liability estimates can fluctuate by significant
amounts based upon the assumptions used by the actuaries. As of
December 31, 2003, a one-percentage-point change in assumed
health care
F-64
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
cost trend rates would have the following effects on the amounts
presented previously for the Horizon postretirement benefit plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Percentage- | |
|
1-Percentage- | |
|
|
Point | |
|
Point | |
|
|
Increase | |
|
Decrease | |
| |
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
|
|
$ |
6,300 |
|
|
$ |
(5,200 |
) |
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
81,300 |
|
|
|
(67,300 |
) |
Plan AssetsHorizons pension plan
weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2003 by
asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Category |
|
2003 | |
| |
Mutual funds
|
|
|
49 |
% |
Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Workers Compensation and Black LungThe
operations of the Combined Companies are subject to federal and
state workers compensation laws. These laws provide for
the payment of benefits to disabled workers and their
dependents, including lifetime benefits for black lung. The
Combined Companies subsidiary operations are either fully
insured or self-insured for their workers compensation and
black lung obligations.
The Combined Companies actuarially determined liability for
self-insured workers compensation and black lung benefits
was based on a 6.75% discount rate and various other assumptions
including incidence of claims, benefits escalation, terminations
and life expectancy. The annual black lung expense consisted of
actuarially determined amounts for self-insured obligations. The
estimated amount of the Combined Companies discounted
obligations for self-insured workers compensation and
black lung claims plus an estimate for incurred but not reported
claims was $32,847 as of December 31, 2003. The
unrecognized projected black lung benefit obligations
(difference between recorded accrual and projected obligations)
at December 31, 2003 was approximately $2,563 and was to be
provided for over the future service period of current employees
as of December 31, 2003. The projected black lung
obligations may vary in a given year based on the timing of
claims filed and changes in actuarial assumptions. The Combined
Companies recorded expenses related to self-insured
workers compensation and black lung of $1,512 for the
period January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004, $2,806
for the year ended December 31, 2003, $1,563 for the period
May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002 and $1,065 for the
period January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002.
401(k) PlanThe Combined Companies sponsor
savings and retirement plans for substantially all employees.
The plans match voluntary contributions of participants up to a
maximum contribution based upon a percentage of a
participants salary with an additional matching
contribution possible at the Combined Companies
discretion. The expense under these plans for the Combined
Companies was $2,488, $1,897, $1,196 and $543 for the period
January 1, 2004 through September 30, 2004, year ended
December 31, 2003, and for the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002 and January 1, 2002 to May 9,
2002, respectively.
F-65
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
12. COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
Coal Sales Contracts and ContingencyAs of
September 30, 2004, the Combined Companies had commitments
under eighteen sales contracts to deliver annually scheduled
base quantities of coal to fifteen customers. The contracts
expire from 2004 through 2020 with the Combined Companies
contracted to supply a minimum of approximately 64 million
tons of coal over the remaining lives of the contracts (maximum
of approximately 16 million tons in 2004). The Combined
Companies also has commitments to purchase certain amounts of
coal to meet its sales commitments. The purchase coal contracts
expire through 2006 and provide the Combined Companies a minimum
of approximately 5.9 million tons of coal through the
remaining lives of the contracts (approximately 2.6 million
tons per year). Certain of the contracts have sales price
adjustment provisions, subject to certain limitations and
adjustments, based on a variety of factors and indices.
LeasesThe Combined Companies lease various
mining, transportation and other equipment under operating and
capital leases. Lease expense for the period January 1,
2004 to September 30, 2004, year ended December 31,
2003, and for the period May 10, 2002 to December 31,
2002, and January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002 was $17,711,
$23,302, $13,429, and $7,093, respectively. Property under
capital leases included in property, plant and equipment in the
combined balance sheets at September 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003 was approximately $2,905 and $3,010, less
accumulated depreciation of approximately $2,208 and $1,619,
respectively. Depreciation of assets under capital leases is
included in depreciation expense.
The Combined Companies also lease coal reserves under agreements
that call for royalties to be paid as the coal is mined. Total
royalty expense for the period January 1, 2004 through
September 30, 2004, the year ended December 31, 2004,
and for the periods May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002
and January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002 was approximately
$13,854, $16,726, $6,698, and $10,574, respectively.
Legal MattersFrom time to time, the Combined
Companies are involved in legal proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management the
Combined Companies have recorded adequate reserves for these
liabilities and there is no individual case or group of related
cases pending that is likely to have a material adverse effect
on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows
of the Combined Companies. With respect to any claims relating
to Horizon which arose prior to November 12, 2002, such
claims are subject to an automatic stay of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code. In limited circumstances, the Bankruptcy Court has lifted
the stay but only to the extent of insurance coverage relating
to Horizon.
CommissionsThe Combined Companies have
various sales and agency agreements with third parties, whereby
they pay a $.10$2.75 per ton commission on various coal
sales agreements. The costs are expensed as the coal is
delivered. The Combined Companies incurred commission expense of
$303 for the period January 1, 2004 to September 30,
2004, $1,706 for the year ended December 31, 2003 and
$1,408 and $653 for the periods May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002 and January 1, 2002 to May 9,
2002, respectively.
Environmental MattersBased upon current
knowledge, the Combined Companies believe they are in material
compliance with environmental laws and regulations as currently
promulgated. However, the exact nature of environmental control
problems, if any, which the Combined Companies may
F-66
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
encounter in the future cannot be predicted, primarily because
of the increasing number, complexity and changing character of
environmental requirements that may be enacted by federal and
state authorities.
Contract Mining AgreementsThe Combined
Companies perform contract-mining services for various third
parties and utilize contract miners on some of its operations.
Terms of the agreements generally allow either party to
terminate the agreements on a short-term basis.
In October 2002, Horizon NR, LLCs subsidiary, Mining
Technologies, Inc. (MTI), entered into a five year contract for
work beginning in April 2003 to provide mining services for a
period of five years or until all mineable coal is removed. MTI
is expected to produce and deliver a minimum of 500,000 tons per
year up to a maximum of 1,500,000 tons per year. The guaranteed
monthly contract tonnage shall be mutually agreed upon. Failure
to meet the guaranteed contract tonnage for three consecutive
months may result in termination of the contract. All work under
the contract must be completed no later than March 31, 2008.
In December 2003, MTI entered into a three year contract for
work beginning in January 2004 to provide mining services for a
period of three years or until all mineable coal is removed. MTI
is expected to produce and deliver a minimum of 50,000 tons of
coal per month that has an ash content of less than fifteen
percent. Failure to meet the guaranteed contract tonnage and ash
requirements for three consecutive months may result in
termination of the contract. All work under the contract must be
completed no later than January 15, 2007.
On February 1, 2004 MTI and Lauren Land agreed to the
assumption and amendment of three highwall mining system lease
agreements between them. The three leases ran for various
remaining terms ranging from 2004 to 2009. Subject to Bankruptcy
Court approval, the agreement called for MTI to assume and amend
the leases by accepting prepayment of all rentals due or to
become due during the current term, plus extensions, of the
three leases, and to grant to Lauren an option to purchase any
or all of the leased systems for the price of $200,000 each. As
of February 1, 2004 Laurens lease payment obligations
for all three leases totaled $9,500,000. Bankruptcy Court
approval was received and the transaction closed on
June 18, 2004.
F-67
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
13. MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The Company and Predecessor Companies have coal sales to the
following major customers that in any period equaled or exceeded
10% of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
January 1, 2004 to | |
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, 2003 to | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
September 30, | |
|
2003 | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
Total | |
|
2004 | |
|
Total | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
Receivable | |
|
Total | |
|
Receivable | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Balance | |
|
Revenues | |
| |
Customer A
|
|
$ |
4,105 |
|
|
$ |
44,788 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
|
$ |
119,817 |
|
Customer B
|
|
|
8,187 |
|
|
|
58,712 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
89,459 |
|
Customer C
|
|
|
11,499 |
|
|
|
36,244 |
|
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
42,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 10, 2002 to | |
|
|
January 1, 2002 to | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
May 9, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Customer A
|
|
$ |
58,566 |
|
|
|
$ |
34,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer B
|
|
|
48,033 |
|
|
|
|
24,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer C
|
|
|
18,235 |
|
|
|
|
5,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-68
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
14. WRITEDOWNS AND OTHER
ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized Companies | |
|
|
| |
|
|
January 1, 2004 to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
May 10, 2002 to | |
|
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
December 31, 2002 | |
| |
Goodwill impairment
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
697,063 |
|
Sale of mineral rights, equipment and impairment of operating
assets
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
6,416 |
|
|
|
32,890 |
|
Inventory writedown and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
10,018 |
|
|
$ |
9,100 |
|
|
$ |
729,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2002 to | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 9, 2002 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Impairment of operating assets
|
|
$ |
8,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
8,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the petition date, the Combined Companies identified
certain non-core assets to be sold to generate cash flow. The
decision was based on the relative value of these assets to the
Combined Companies and the applicability of them to the
long-term mine plan. During the period of January 1, 2004
to September 30, 2004 a $13,327 loss was recognized on the
sale of coal reserves, a $7,736 gain on lease buyout, a
loss on retirement of highwall mining system of $6,168 and other
gains of $1,741.
SFAS No. 144 addresses the applicable accounting when
companies are unable to generate sufficient cash flows to
recover the carrying amount of its fixed assets, coal reserves,
contract costs, development costs and long-term advance
royalties. As a result of applying SFAS No. 144 for
the year ending December 31, 2003, the Combined Companies
wrote down assets aggregating $6,416. These losses resulted from
deteriorating market conditions, poor mining conditions and a
change in mine plans.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Combined
Companies wrote down parts inventory of $2,677 as a result of
the annual physical inventory at a subsidiary warehouse and
incurred other writedowns of $7.
As of December 31, 2002, the Combined Companies wrote off
their goodwill value as a result of the application of
SFAS No. 142. Under SFAS No. 142, if the
carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the fair value of that
goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to
the excess. The Combined Companies used a discounted cash flow
approach to estimate the fair value of its assets. Upon
completing the calculation, it was determined that after
covering the Combined Companies identifiable assets
carrying amounts, there was no excess value remaining to cover
the goodwill value. The impairment resulted from the conditions
leading to Horizons November 13, 2002 Chapter 11
filing.
After the Petition Date, the Combined Companies identified one
under performing mine (Blue Springs Job 21) at which
operations were closed. The Combined Companies based its
decision to close this
F-69
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
operation on various factors, including minable reserve
depletion, operating costs, productivity, and whether this
particular property fit within their long-term business plan.
The Combined Companies also idled a significant amount of
equipment which it has identified either for sale to third
parties (if owned) or for rejection (if leased).
During the period January 1, 2002 to May 9, 2002, the
Combined Companies identified certain idle properties that had
excess asset values and also closed certain of its mines.
Impairment charges were recorded to reduce these assets to
recoverable values at the idled properties and closed mines of
$8,323.
15. REORGANIZATION ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized Companies | |
|
|
| |
|
|
January 1, 2004 to | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
May 10, 2002 to | |
|
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
December 31, 2002 | |
| |
Bankruptcy related reorganization expenses, including
professional services fees and labor costs
|
|
$ |
(12,471 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,064 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,075 |
) |
Write-offs of payables to/ receivables from other Horizon
subsidiaries
|
|
|
13,198 |
|
|
|
(29,720 |
) |
|
|
(139,588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
727 |
|
|
$ |
(52,784 |
) |
|
$ |
(143,663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Companies | |
|
|
| |
|
|
January 1, 2002 to | |
|
|
May 9, 2002 | |
| |
Gain on Fresh Start Valuation
|
|
$ |
645,824 |
|
Gain on Debt Extinguishment
|
|
|
161,584 |
|
Bankruptcy related reorganization expenses, including
professional services fees and labor costs
|
|
|
(19,508 |
) |
Write-offs of payables to/ receivables from other Horizon
subsidiaries
|
|
|
779,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,567,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
16. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
The book values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable and accounts payable are considered to be
representative of their respective fair values because of the
immediate short-term maturity of these financial instruments.
Given the Combined Companies current liquidity status (see
Notes 2 and 8), the fair value of the senior secured term
notes and senior secured notes could not be determined or
estimated. The carrying value of the Combined Companies
other debt instruments approximates fair value.
F-70
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
As of September 30, 2004, for the period January 1, 2004 to
September 30, 2004,
Year Ended December 31, 2003, the period May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002
(reorganized companies) and the period January 1, 2002 to May
9, 2002 (predecessor companies)
(Dollars in thousands)
17. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
AND BALANCES
Prior to May 10, 2002, the Combined Companies dealt with
certain companies or individuals which were related parties
either by having stockholders in common or because they were
controlled by stockholders/ officers of Horizon, including the
Combined Companies, or by relatives of stockholders/ officers of
Horizon. For the period May 10, 2002 to September 30,
2004, the Combined Companies had no related-party transactions.
In addition to related-party transactions and balances described
elsewhere, the following related-party transactions and balances
are summarized and approximated as follows below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2002 | |
|
|
through | |
|
|
May 9, 2002 | |
| |
Revenues, costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales
|
|
$ |
2,537 |
|
|
Equipment rental and repair income
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
Administrative and miscellaneous income
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
Trucking expense
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
Repair, maintenance & other mining costs
|
|
|
6,818 |
|
|
Equipment rental cost
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
Administrative and miscellaneous expense
|
|
|
3 |
|
F-71
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
To the Boards of Directors and Stockholders
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Morgantown, West Virginia
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (Company), as of
December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders deficit, and cash flows for
the year then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration
of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
April 22, 2005
F-72
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
2,342,409 |
|
|
$ |
1,165,559 |
|
|
Accounts receivable trade, net of allowance of
$1,194,985 at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004
|
|
|
9,161,820 |
|
|
|
9,050,468 |
|
|
Accounts receivable other
|
|
|
2,524,670 |
|
|
|
2,311,255 |
|
|
Coal and supply inventory
|
|
|
3,935,230 |
|
|
|
4,026,612 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
1,606,275 |
|
|
|
1,457,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
19,570,404 |
|
|
|
18,010,981 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
61,253,613 |
|
|
|
54,122,751 |
|
NOTES RECEIVABLE, net of allowance of $795,797 at
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
ADVANCE ROYALTIES
|
|
|
3,232,406 |
|
|
|
3,439,379 |
|
OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds and deposits
|
|
|
2,982,172 |
|
|
|
2,583,082 |
|
|
Investment in joint venture
|
|
|
832,488 |
|
|
|
434,322 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,251,363 |
|
|
|
4,280,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other non-current assets
|
|
|
8,066,023 |
|
|
|
7,297,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$ |
92,122,446 |
|
|
$ |
83,370,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
14,601,742 |
|
|
$ |
10,281,124 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
7,982,784 |
|
|
|
8,253,453 |
|
|
Reclamation current portion
|
|
|
2,049,000 |
|
|
|
105,413 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
18,572,521 |
|
|
|
14,848,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
43,206,047 |
|
|
|
33,488,680 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
10,071,046 |
|
|
|
9,699,753 |
|
OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclamation
|
|
|
23,668,829 |
|
|
|
25,168,633 |
|
|
Deferred gain on sale-leaseback
|
|
|
8,767,033 |
|
|
|
8,832,792 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,658,988 |
|
|
|
4,783,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
37,094,850 |
|
|
|
38,784,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
90,371,943 |
|
|
|
81,973,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized and
issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
145,588,00 |
|
|
|
145,588,000 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(143,837,497 |
) |
|
|
(144,190,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
1,750,503 |
|
|
|
1,397,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
92,122,446 |
|
|
$ |
83,370,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-73
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, | |
|
For the year ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal revenue
|
|
$ |
42,141,633 |
|
|
$ |
34,527,179 |
|
|
$ |
146,675,714 |
|
|
Freight and handling
|
|
|
3,153,779 |
|
|
|
2,835,518 |
|
|
|
11,415,952 |
|
|
Waste and blended fuel revenue
|
|
|
2,148,363 |
|
|
|
1,539,223 |
|
|
|
6,228,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
47,443,775 |
|
|
|
38,901,920 |
|
|
|
164,320,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of coal sold
|
|
|
40,818,495 |
|
|
|
35,220,737 |
|
|
|
145,985,163 |
|
|
Freight and handling costs
|
|
|
3,153,779 |
|
|
|
2,835,518 |
|
|
|
11,415,952 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
2,941,898 |
|
|
|
2,237,300 |
|
|
|
9,754,467 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
1,109,524 |
|
|
|
777,158 |
|
|
|
4,585,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
48,023,696 |
|
|
|
41,070,713 |
|
|
|
171,741,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING LOSS
|
|
|
(579,921 |
) |
|
|
(2,168,793 |
) |
|
|
(7,420,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
52,486 |
|
|
|
50,697 |
|
|
|
181,164 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(614,873 |
) |
|
|
(348,049 |
) |
|
|
(1,485,481 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1,495,477 |
|
|
|
1,091,589 |
|
|
|
5,528,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
933,090 |
|
|
|
794,237 |
|
|
|
4,223,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
353,169 |
|
|
$ |
(1,374,556 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,196,973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-74
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital | |
|
deficit | |
|
Total | |
| |
Balances at December 31, 2003, as previously reported
|
|
$ |
145,588,000 |
|
|
$ |
(141,925,000 |
) |
|
$ |
3,663,000 |
|
|
Prior period adjustment see Note 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
931,307 |
|
|
|
931,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As adjusted
|
|
|
145,588,000 |
|
|
|
(140,993,693 |
) |
|
|
4,594,307 |
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,196,973 |
) |
|
|
(3,196,973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
145,588,000 |
|
|
|
(144,190,666 |
) |
|
|
1,397,334 |
|
|
Net income March 31, 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,169 |
|
|
|
353,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at March 31, 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
$ |
145,588,000 |
|
|
$ |
(143,837,497 |
) |
|
$ |
1,750,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-75
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, | |
|
For the year ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
353,169 |
|
|
$ |
(1,374,556 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,196,973 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
2,941,898 |
|
|
|
2,237,300 |
|
|
|
9,754,467 |
|
|
|
Loss on sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
7,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,805 |
|
|
|
Equity in loss (income) of joint venture
|
|
|
(398,166 |
) |
|
|
123,906 |
|
|
|
26,929 |
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable trade
|
|
|
(111,352 |
) |
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
(1,608,549 |
) |
|
|
|
Accounts receivable other
|
|
|
(213,415 |
) |
|
|
(645,356 |
) |
|
|
(1,299,892 |
) |
|
|
|
Coal and supply inventory
|
|
|
91,382 |
|
|
|
596,844 |
|
|
|
(2,023,272 |
) |
|
|
|
Other current assets and other assets
|
|
|
(555,375 |
) |
|
|
575,904 |
|
|
|
(568,336 |
) |
|
|
|
Advance royalties
|
|
|
206,973 |
|
|
|
(352,212 |
) |
|
|
(1,616,922 |
) |
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
4,320,618 |
|
|
|
1,049,672 |
|
|
|
5,339,644 |
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(270,669 |
) |
|
|
980,074 |
|
|
|
2,086,921 |
|
|
|
|
Other current and non-current liabilities
|
|
|
253,501 |
|
|
|
(108,668 |
) |
|
|
3,149,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
6,626,316 |
|
|
|
3,085,775 |
|
|
|
10,149,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(10,052,090 |
) |
|
|
(4,623,431 |
) |
|
|
(27,238,311 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,750 |
|
|
Proceeds from notes receivable
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(9,544,590 |
) |
|
|
(4,623,431 |
) |
|
|
(26,298,582 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on debt
|
|
|
(1,691,461 |
) |
|
|
(432,033 |
) |
|
|
(4,840,717 |
) |
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
5,786,585 |
|
|
|
3,967,210 |
|
|
|
18,978,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
4,095,124 |
|
|
|
3,535,177 |
|
|
|
14,137,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,176,850 |
|
|
|
1,997,521 |
|
|
|
(2,011,191 |
) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
1,165,559 |
|
|
|
3,176,750 |
|
|
|
3,176,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
2,342,409 |
|
|
$ |
5,174,271 |
|
|
$ |
1,165,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
$ |
343,157 |
|
|
$ |
348,049 |
|
|
$ |
703,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-76
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
1. |
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES |
Description of businessAnker Coal Group,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) was formed in
August 1996 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Company
was organized in order to effect a recapitalization of its
predecessor, Anker Group, Inc., which had been engaged in the
production of coal since 1975. The operations of the Company and
its subsidiaries, which are principally located in West Virginia
and Maryland, consist of mining and selling coal from mineral
rights that it owns and/or leases, as well as brokering coal
from other producers.
On October 29, 2002, the Company filed petitions under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Code). On
July 29, 2003, the Companys Plan of Reorganization
(Plan) was approved and the Company emerged from bankruptcy with
the approval of the exit financing on October 10, 2003.
Basis of presentationThe accompanying
unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for
interim financial information. The consolidated balance sheet as
of March 31, 2005, consolidated statements of operations
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the
consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004 are unaudited, but include all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which
the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of the
financial position, operating results and cash flows for the
periods presented. The results of operations for the interim
periods are not indicative of the results to be expected for the
year or any future period.
Principles of consolidationThe condensed
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Anker
Coal Group, Inc. and its wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries.
All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Cash equivalentsThe Company classifies
highly liquid investments with original maturities of three
months or less at the time of purchase as cash equivalents.
Trade accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful
accountsTrade accounts receivable are recorded at
the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for
doubtful accounts is the Companys best estimate of the
amount of probable credit losses in the Companys existing
accounts receivable. The Company establishes provisions for
losses on accounts receivable when it is probable that all or
part of the outstanding balance will not be collected. The
Company regularly reviews collectibility and establishes or
adjusts the allowance as necessary using the specific
identification method. Account balances are charged off against
the allowance. The Company does not have any off-balance sheet
credit exposure related to its customers.
Coal and supply inventoryCoal inventory is
stated at the lower of average cost or market. As of
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, inventories
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
$3,537,673 |
|
|
$ |
3,673,080 |
|
Parts and supplies, net of allowances of $26,015 and $142,996
|
|
|
397,557 |
|
|
|
353,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3,935,230 |
|
|
$ |
4,026,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipmentProperty, plant
and equipment, including coal reserves and mine development
costs are recorded at cost, which includes construction overhead
and interest, where applicable. Expenditures for major renewals
and betterments are capitalized while expenditures for
maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Coal reserves
are depleted using the units-of-
F-77
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
production method, based on estimated recoverable reserves. Mine
development costs are amortized using the units-of-production
method, based on estimated recoverable reserves. Other property,
plant and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line
method with estimated useful lives substantially as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years |
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
10 to 30 |
Machinery and equipment
|
|
3 to 15 |
Vehicles
|
|
3 to 5 |
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
3 to 10 |
Advance royaltiesThe Company is required,
under certain royalty lease agreements, to make minimum royalty
payments whether or not mining activity is being performed on
the leased property. These minimum payments may be recoupable
once mining begins on the leased property. The recoupable
minimum royalty payments are capitalized and the deferred costs
amortized based on the units-of-production method at a rate
defined in the lease agreement once mining activities begin, or
the deferred costs are expensed when mining has ceased or a
decision is made not to mine on such property.
Investment in joint ventureThe investment in
joint venture, accounted for on the equity method, represents
the Companys 50% ownership in a venture with an unrelated
party to mine coal on a specific property. The Companys
share of earnings of the joint venture is included in other
income.
Coal mine reclamation and mine closure
costsFuture cost requirements for reclamation of
land are estimated where surface and deep mining operations have
been conducted, based on the Companys interpretation of
the technical standards of regulations enacted by the
U.S. Office of Surface Mining, as well as state
regulations. These costs relate to reclaiming the pit and
support acreage at surface mines and sealing portals at deep
mines. Other costs common to both types of mining are related to
reclaiming refuse and slurry ponds as well as holding and
related termination/exit costs.
The Company records these reclamation obligations under the
provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 addresses
asset retirement obligations that result from the acquisition,
construction or normal operation of long-lived assets. It
requires companies to recognize asset retirement obligations at
fair value when the liability is incurred. Upon initial
recognition of a liability, that cost should be capitalized as
part of the related long-lived asset and allocated to expense
over the useful life of the asset. The asset retirement costs
are recorded in coal reserves.
The Company expenses contemporaneous reclamation which is
performed prior to final mine closure. The establishment of the
end of mine reclamation and closure liability is based upon
permit requirements and requires significant estimates and
assumptions, principally associated with regulatory
requirements, costs and recoverable coal reserves. Annually, the
end of mine reclamation and closure liability is reviewed and
necessary adjustments are made, including mine plan and permit
changes and revisions to cost and production levels to optimize
mining and reclamation efficiency. The amount of such
adjustments is reflected in the
SFAS No. 143 year-end calculation. When a mine
life is shortened due to a change in the mine plan, mine closing
obligations are accelerated and the related accrual is increased
accordingly.
Income tax provisionThe provision for income
taxes includes federal, state and local income taxes currently
payable and those deferred because of temporary differences
between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and
liabilities. Income taxes are recorded under the liability
method. Under this
F-78
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the estimated
future tax effects of differences between the tax basis of
assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts as
well as net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits based
on enacted tax laws. Valuation allowances are established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected
to be realized.
Revenue recognitionCoal revenue includes
sales to customers of company-produced coal and coal purchased
from third parties. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale
of company-produced coal and brokered coal at the time title
passes to the customer, which is either upon shipment or upon
customer receipt of coal, based on contractual terms. Freight
and handling billed to customers is included in revenues. Waste
and blended fuel revenue is generated from shipments of waste
fuel and blended fuel, and is recognized as revenue as shipments
are made.
Asset impairments and accelerated mine closing
accrualsThe Company follows
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which requires that projected
future cash flows from use and disposition of assets be compared
with the carrying amounts of those assets. When the sum of
projected cash flows is less than the carrying amount,
impairment losses are recognized. In determining such impairment
losses, discounted cash flows are utilized to determine the fair
value of the assets being evaluated.
Workers compensation and black lung
benefitsThe Company is liable under federal and
state laws to pay workers compensation and pneumoconiosis
(black lung) benefits to eligible employees, former employees
and their dependents. The Company utilizes a state workers
compensation and black lung fund to secure on-going obligations.
Managements use of estimatesThe
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Significant items
subject to such estimates and assumptions include the allowance
for doubtful accounts; inventories; coal reserves; asset
retirement obligations; future cash flows associated with
assets; useful lives for depreciation, depletion and
amortization; and income taxes. Due to the subjective nature of
these estimates, actual results could differ from those
estimates.
F-79
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
2. |
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
4,122,242 |
|
|
$ |
4,127,202 |
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
20,913,551 |
|
|
|
19,233,942 |
|
Mine development
|
|
|
40,862,113 |
|
|
|
37,623,860 |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
59,439,836 |
|
|
|
56,830,387 |
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
579,096 |
|
|
|
579,096 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
3,451,851 |
|
|
|
3,451,851 |
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
4,918,179 |
|
|
|
2,631,545 |
|
Mineral rights
|
|
|
9,567,906 |
|
|
|
9,567,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
143,854,774 |
|
|
|
134,045,789 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
82,601,161 |
|
|
|
79,923,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
61,253,613 |
|
|
$ |
54,122,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the periods indicated below, long-term debt consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Senior notes, interest at 10%
|
|
$ |
7,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,000,000 |
|
Note payable, interest at 8%
|
|
|
1,263,723 |
|
|
|
1,592,622 |
|
Related party note payable, interest at 8%
|
|
|
11,382,705 |
|
|
|
7,580,834 |
|
Related party revolving credit line, interest at 8%
|
|
|
4,500,000 |
|
|
|
4,500,000 |
|
Equipment notes (fixed rates ranging from 4% to 7.643%)
|
|
|
4,497,139 |
|
|
|
3,874,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
28,643,567 |
|
|
|
24,548,443 |
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
18,572,521 |
|
|
|
14,848,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$ |
10,071,046 |
|
|
$ |
9,699,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The senior notes represent bonds that mature in October 2013
with quarterly principal payments of $350,000 beginning in
October 2008 and interest payable upon maturity. The senior
notes are collateralized by substantially all of the
Companys assets.
The note payable is for workers compensation premiums due
the state of West Virginia. Interest is fixed at 8%. The note is
due in February 2006. The note payable is collateralized by
substantially all of the Companys assets.
The related party note payable is a multi-draw loan with each
draw bearing an 8% fixed interest rate. The note payable
agreement was amended in January 2005 extending the maturity
date from January 31, 2005 to June 30, 2005. The notes
are collateralized by substantially all of the Companys
assets.
The related party revolving credit line bears interest at 8%
annually. The revolving credit line agreement was amended in
January 2005 extending the maturity date from January 31,
2005 to June 30, 2005. The credit line is collateralized by
substantially all of the Companys assets.
F-80
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
The equipment notes have maturities ranging from April 2005 to
November 2009 and are collateralized by mining equipment with a
net book value of $4,497,139 at March 31, 2005 (unaudited).
At December 31, 2004, maturities of long-term debt are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31 |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
14,848,690 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,034,428 |
|
2007
|
|
|
596,862 |
|
2008
|
|
|
981,121 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,822,478 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5,264,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
24,548,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
DEFERRED GAIN ON SALE-LEASEBACK |
On December 29, 2003, the Company sold specific coal
reserves to CoalQuest Development, LLC (CoalQuest), a related
party, for $19,000,000. The Company subsequently leased back
specific coal properties and mining rights that represented
approximately 8% of the coal reserves sold to CoalQuest. The
initial lease term is for five years and will automatically
renew for additional one-year terms until all coal has been
removed. The Company has the option to terminate the lease by
providing written notice 90 days prior to the expiration of
the then current term. The lease requires a tonnage royalty of
the greater of $1.25 per ton or 4% of the average gross
sales price with a 2,000,000 ton annual minimum.
For the coal reserves leased back, a deferred gain of $9,200,000
was recorded. The gain is being amortized over the lease term
under the units-of-production method.
Other income, net consists of the following for the periods
indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Ash revenue
|
|
$ |
446,402 |
|
|
$ |
410,147 |
|
|
$ |
1,637,798 |
|
Commissions revenue
|
|
|
172,990 |
|
|
|
186,058 |
|
|
|
1,434,934 |
|
Miscellaneous revenue
|
|
|
253,584 |
|
|
|
440,801 |
|
|
|
1,703,069 |
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of joint venture
|
|
|
398,166 |
|
|
|
(123,906 |
) |
|
|
(26,929 |
) |
Royalty revenue
|
|
|
224,335 |
|
|
|
178,489 |
|
|
|
779,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,495,477 |
|
|
$ |
1,091,589 |
|
|
$ |
5,528,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company leases office space under an operating lease. Lease
expense related to this lease for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited) and year ended
December 31, 2004 was approximately $56,000, $59,000 and
$228,000, respectively. The lease requires minimum annual
payments of $240,000 through January 2006.
The Company leases coal reserves under agreements that call for
royalties to be paid as the coal is mined. Total royalty
expense, including related party expense discussed in
Note 4, for the three months
F-81
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited) and year ended
December 31, 2004 was $1,274,858, $977,202 and $4,322,000,
respectively. Certain agreements require minimum annual
royalties to be paid regardless of the amount of coal mined
during the year. Certain agreements may be cancelable at the
Companys discretion.
Approximate non-cancelable future minimum royalty payments as of
December 31, 2004, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
1,218,620 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,176,476 |
|
2007
|
|
|
824,583 |
|
2008
|
|
|
818,567 |
|
2009
|
|
|
813,534 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
813,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
5,664,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return. The
income tax provision (benefit) is composed of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Current
|
|
$ |
652,231 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(494,008 |
) |
|
|
(550,749 |
) |
|
|
(1,038,328 |
) |
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(158,223 |
) |
|
|
550,749 |
|
|
|
1,038,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the difference between the actual
tax provision (benefit) and the amounts obtained by applying the
statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to the income
and losses before income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
| |
Federal provision (benefit) computed at statutory rate
|
|
$ |
(1,118,941 |
) |
State income tax provision (benefit) (net of federal tax
benefits and apportionment factors) computed at statutory rate
|
|
|
(159,849 |
) |
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
1,038,328 |
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
141,456 |
|
Other
|
|
|
99,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-82
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
Significant components of the Companies deferred tax
assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2004 are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
| |
Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued employee benefits
|
|
$ |
2,347,632 |
|
|
Accrued reclamation and closure
|
|
|
9,725,829 |
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
3,365,676 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
451,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,891,121 |
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,622,294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,268,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, coal reserves and mine development costs
|
|
|
13,268,827 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,268,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset/liability
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classified in balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$ |
241,052 |
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
$ |
241,052 |
|
A valuation allowance has been provided for deferred tax assets
because the Company believes it is more likely than not that the
deferred tax assets will not be realized.
In connection with the emergence from bankruptcy on
October 10, 2003 the Company realized a gain from the
cancellation of certain indebtedness (COI) of approximately
$92,000,000. This gain will not be taxable since the gain
resulted from the reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code.
However, the Company is required, as of the beginning of its
2004 taxable year, to reduce certain tax attributes including
NOL and capital loss carryforwards, credits, and tax basis in
assets in an amount not to exceed such COI income.
As a result of this requirement the Companys NOLs for
regular tax and alternative minimum tax have been eliminated and
capital loss carryforwards and alternative minimum tax credit
carryforwards have also been eliminated. In addition the Company
reduced the tax basis in its assets by approximately $38,588,000.
The Company has a contributory defined contribution retirement
plan covering all employees who meet certain eligibility
requirements. The plan provides for employer contributions
representing 5% of compensation. The Companys
contributions amounted to approximately $175,904, $145,456 and
$703,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and year ended December 31, 2004, respectively.
The Company also has a 401(k) savings plan for all employees who
meet eligibility requirements. The plan provides for mandatory
employer contributions to match 100% of the first 3% of employee
contributions and 50% of the next 2% of employee contributions.
Thus, the Companys contribution could be as much as 4% of
each participants compensation, subject to statutory
limits. In addition, the Company may make discretionary
contributions of 1% of employee compensation. The Companys
F-83
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
contributions amounted to $82,572, $72,441 and $326,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited) and
for the year ended December 31, 2004, respectively.
The Company had the following balances and transactions with
CoalQuest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the | |
|
As of and for the | |
|
|
three months | |
|
year ended | |
|
|
ended | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Advance royalties
|
|
$ |
1,038,960 |
|
|
$ |
1,038,960 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
93,391 |
|
|
|
70,345 |
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,336,522 |
|
|
|
1,168,384 |
|
Royalty expense
|
|
|
431,410 |
|
|
|
1,769,324 |
|
|
|
10. |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Coal sales contracts and contingencyAs of
March 31, 2005 (unaudited), the Company had commitments
under six sales contracts that extend past 2005 to deliver
annually scheduled base quantities of coal to four customers.
The contracts expire from 2005 through 2020 with the Company
contracted to supply a minimum of approximately 43 million
tons of coal over the remaining lives of the contracts (maximum
of approximately 3.9 million tons in 2007). The Company
also has commitments to purchase certain amounts of coal to meet
its sales commitments. The purchase coal contracts expire
through 2010 and provide the Company a minimum of approximately
6.1 million tons of coal through the remaining lives of the
contracts (approximately 1.0 million tons per year).
Certain of the contracts have sales price adjustment provisions,
subject to certain limitations and adjustments, based on a
variety of factors and indices.
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had commitments under
five sales contracts that extend past 2005 to deliver annually
scheduled base quantities of coal to four customers. The
contracts expire from 2005 through 2020 with the Company
contracted to supply a minimum of approximately 22 million
tons of coal over the remaining lives of the contracts (maximum
of approximately 3.4 million tons in 2005). The Company
also has commitments to purchase certain amounts of coal to meet
its sales commitments. The purchase coal contracts expire
through 2010 and provide the Company a minimum of approximately
3.6 million tons of coal through the remaining lives of the
contracts (approximately .6 million tons per year). Certain
of the contracts have sales price adjustment provisions, subject
to certain limitations and adjustments, based on a variety of
factors and indices.
Legal mattersThe Company is named as
defendant in various actions in the ordinary course of business.
These actions generally involve disputes related to contract
performance and property rights. Management is defending these
matters vigorously. Management believes the ultimate disposition
of these matters will not have a material adverse effect upon
the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
Environmental MattersBased upon current
knowledge, the Company believes it is in material compliance
with environmental laws and regulations as currently
promulgated. However, the exact nature of environmental control
problems, if any, which the Company may encounter in the future
cannot be predicted, primarily because of the increasing number,
complexity and changing character of environmental requirements
that may be enacted by federal and state authorities.
F-84
Anker Coal Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(CONTINUED)
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2004
The Company had coal sales to the following major customers that
in any period equaled or exceeded 10% of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
Receivable | |
|
Total | |
|
Receivable | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Balance | |
|
Revenues | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Customer A
|
|
$ |
3,893,613 |
|
|
$ |
9,032,608 |
|
|
$ |
3,253,195 |
|
|
$ |
31,377,653 |
|
Customer B
|
|
|
2,010,176 |
|
|
|
6,247,687 |
|
|
|
488,537 |
|
|
|
25,146,998 |
|
Customer C
|
|
|
1,100,626 |
|
|
|
5,664,750 |
|
|
|
3,037,820 |
|
|
|
24,324,298 |
|
Customer D
|
|
|
59,834 |
|
|
|
5,379,887 |
|
|
|
563,485 |
|
|
|
17,734,949 |
|
|
|
12. |
BUSINESS COMBINATION AGREEMENT |
The Company entered into a Business Combination Agreement
(Agreement) on March 31, 2005, to become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of another company. The Agreement will be affected
through issuance of shares of common stock. The Agreement is
subject to certain closing conditions.
|
|
13. |
PRIOR PERIOD ADJUSTMENT |
Subsequent to the issuance of the Companys financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003,
management determined income taxes payable at that date were
incorrectly reported. Accordingly, a prior period adjustment of
$931,307 has been recorded as of December 31, 2003, as a
reduction of the previously reported accumulated deficit of
$141,925,000 at that date.
F-85
CoalQuest Development LLC
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
CoalQuest Development LLC
New York, New York
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of CoalQuest
Development LLC (Company) as of December 31, 2004, and the
related statements of income, members equity, and cash
flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration
of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
April 22, 2005
F-86
CoalQuest Development LLC
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,862,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,818,883 |
|
|
Royalties receivable
|
|
|
1,392,631 |
|
|
|
1,238,729 |
|
|
Prepaid expense
|
|
|
34,719 |
|
|
|
15,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,289,819 |
|
|
|
3,072,762 |
|
Coal reserves, net
|
|
|
18,902,610 |
|
|
|
18,920,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$ |
22,192,429 |
|
|
$ |
21,993,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
517,441 |
|
|
$ |
546,082 |
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
679,483 |
|
|
|
535,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,196,924 |
|
|
|
1,081,282 |
|
NOTES PAYABLE
|
|
|
16,250,000 |
|
|
|
16,250,000 |
|
DEFERRED ROYALTY INCOME
|
|
|
1,038,960 |
|
|
|
1,038,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
18,485,884 |
|
|
|
18,370,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
MEMBERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,250,000 |
|
|
|
3,250,000 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
456,545 |
|
|
|
373,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total members equity
|
|
|
3,706,545 |
|
|
|
3,623,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members equity
|
|
$ |
22,192,429 |
|
|
$ |
21,993,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-87
CoalQuest Development LLC
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
For the year ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
ROYALTY INCOME
|
|
$ |
431,410 |
|
|
$ |
356,154 |
|
|
$ |
1,769,324 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
137,007 |
|
|
|
104,245 |
|
|
|
449,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
294,403 |
|
|
|
251,909 |
|
|
|
1,320,212 |
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
8,014 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
7,934 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(144,283 |
) |
|
|
(97,672 |
) |
|
|
(535,200 |
) |
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(136,269 |
) |
|
|
(97,030 |
) |
|
|
(394,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
158,134 |
|
|
$ |
154,879 |
|
|
$ |
925,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-88
CoalQuest Development LLC
STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
(unaudited) and for the year ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
Paid-in | |
|
earnings | |
|
|
|
|
capital | |
|
(deficit) | |
|
Total | |
| |
Balance at January 1, 2004
|
|
$ |
8,450,890 |
|
|
$ |
(174,491 |
) |
|
$ |
8,276,399 |
|
|
Capital contribution
|
|
|
1,592,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,592,243 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925,553 |
|
|
|
925,553 |
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(6,793,133 |
) |
|
|
(377,646 |
) |
|
|
(7,170,779 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
3,250,000 |
|
|
|
373,416 |
|
|
|
3,623,416 |
|
|
Net income (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,134 |
|
|
|
158,134 |
|
|
Distributions (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,005 |
) |
|
|
(75,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
$ |
3,250,000 |
|
|
$ |
456,545 |
|
|
$ |
3,706,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-89
CoalQuest Development LLC
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended | |
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
For the year ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
158,134 |
|
|
$ |
154,879 |
|
|
$ |
925,553 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion
|
|
|
18,286 |
|
|
|
17,471 |
|
|
|
79,104 |
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties receivable
|
|
|
(153,902 |
) |
|
|
(136,636 |
) |
|
|
(199,769 |
) |
|
|
|
Prepaid expense
|
|
|
(19,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,150 |
) |
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(28,641 |
) |
|
|
45,211 |
|
|
|
(6,835 |
) |
|
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
144,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
118,591 |
|
|
|
80,925 |
|
|
|
1,318,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,049,110 |
) |
|
|
(11,049,110 |
) |
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,250,000 |
|
|
|
16,250,000 |
|
|
Capital contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,592,243 |
|
|
|
1,592,243 |
|
|
Distributions of capital
|
|
|
(75,005 |
) |
|
|
(6,793,133 |
) |
|
|
(6,793,133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(75,005 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
43,586 |
|
|
|
80,925 |
|
|
|
1,318,103 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
1,818,883 |
|
|
|
500,780 |
|
|
|
500,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
1,862,469 |
|
|
$ |
581,705 |
|
|
$ |
1,818,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared included in accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
377,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred royalty income included in royalties receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,038,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-90
CoalQuest Development LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited)
and for the year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
1. |
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES |
Description of business CoalQuest
Development LLC (the Company) was formed in
December 2003 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The
Company is a property holding company which holds and leases
land consisting of coal reserves. The Company is a related party
with its only customer due to certain common ownership.
Basis of presentationThe accompanying unaudited
interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information. The balance sheet as of March 31,
2005, statements of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the statements of cash flows
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are
unaudited, but include all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring adjustments) which the Company considers necessary for
a fair presentation of the financial position, operating results
and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of
operations for the interim periods are not indicative of the
results to be expected for the year or any future period.
Cash equivalents The Company classifies
highly liquid investments with original maturities of three
months or less at the time of purchase as cash equivalents.
Royalties receivable Royalties receivable
are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest.
The Company establishes provisions for losses on accounts
receivable when it is probable that all or part of the
outstanding balance will not be collected. The Company does not
have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its
customers.
Coal reserves Coal reserves are recorded at
the cost purchased from a related party. These reserves are
depleted to the estimated land value using the
units-of-production method, based on estimated recoverable
reserves.
Coal mine reclamation and mine closure costs
Future cost requirements for reclamation of land owned by the
Company where surface and deep mining operations have been
conducted are the responsibility of the Companys related
party customer as set out in the lease agreement.
Income taxes The Company is a limited
liability corporation for federal and state income tax purposes.
Accordingly, the members report the Companys taxable
income or loss on their individual tax returns.
Deferred Royalty Income The Companys
related party customer has a minimum royalty tonnage requirement
of 2,000,000 tons per year. Any tons short of the annual
minimum can be recouped in the subsequent five years. The
Company records the difference between tons actually mined and
the minimum tonnage requirement as a deferred royalty and will
amortize the deferred amounts into income when the related party
customer exceeds the minimum tonnage requirement.
Revenue recognition Royalty income includes
contractual obligations of the related party customer to pay for
the right to mine coal or minimum tons required to be mined
regardless of the amount of coal mined during the year, on
Company owned property. The royalty revenue rate of the greater
of $1.25 per ton or 4% of the average gross sales price was
negotiated between the related parties, which royalty rate
cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arms length
basis.
Managements use of estimates The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Significant items subject to such
estimates and assumptions include the allowance for doubtful
accounts; coal reserves; future cash flows associated with
assets; and useful
F-91
CoalQuest Development LLC
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(unaudited)
and for the year ended December 31, 2004
lives for depletion. Due to the subjective nature of these
estimates, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Coal reserves consist of the following as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Coal reserves
|
|
$ |
19,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,000,000 |
|
Less accumulated depletion
|
|
|
97,390 |
|
|
|
79,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal reserves, net
|
|
$ |
18,902,610 |
|
|
$ |
18,920,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable consists of notes payable to members of
$16,250,000 at March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2004. Interest is fixed at 3.49%. The notes
are due on January 29, 2009 and require semi-annual
interest payments.
|
|
4. |
BUSINESS COMBINATION AGREEMENT |
The Company entered into a Business Combination Agreement
(Agreement) on March 31, 2005, to become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of another company. The Agreement will be affected
through issuance of shares of common stock. The Agreement is
subject to certain closing conditions.
* * * *
F-92
[Inside back cover graphics to be filed by amendment]
ANNEX B: SECTION 262 OF THE DGCL
Section 262 Appraisal Rights
(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who holds shares of stock on the date of
the making of a demand pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to such shares, who
continuously holds such shares through the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has
otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has neither voted in favor of the
merger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to §228 of this title shall be
entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery of the fair value of the stockholders shares of
stock under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section. As used in this
section, the word stockholder means a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation and also a
member of record of a nonstock corporation; the words stock and share mean and include what is
ordinarily meant by those words and also membership or membership interest of a member of a
nonstock corporation; and the words depository receipt mean a receipt or other instrument issued
by a depository representing an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of
stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.
(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a
constituent corporation in a merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to §251 (other than a
merger effected pursuant to §251(g) of this title), §252, §254, §257, §258, §263 or §264 of this
title:
(1) Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the
shares of any class or series of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect thereof, at
the record date fixed to determine the stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at
the meeting of stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or consolidation, were either (i)
listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market system security on an
interdealer quotation system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or (ii) held
of record by more than 2,000 holders; and further provided that no appraisal rights shall be
available for any shares of stock of the constituent corporation surviving a merger if the merger
did not require for its approval the vote of the stockholders of the surviving corporation as
provided in subsection (f) of §251 of this title.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection, appraisal rights under this section
shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation if
the holders thereof are required by the terms of an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant
to §§251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this title to accept for such stock anything except:
a. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from such merger or
consolidation, or depository receipts in respect thereof;
b. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository receipts in respect thereof,
which shares of stock (or depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository receipts at
the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national
securities exchange or designated as a national market system security on an interdealer
quotation system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or held of record
by more than 2,000 holders;
c. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the
foregoing subparagraphs a. and b. of this paragraph; or
d. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository receipts and cash in lieu of
fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs
a., b. and c. of this paragraph.
(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware corporation party to a merger
effected under §253 of this title is not owned by the parent corporation immediately prior to the
merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation.
B-1
(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights
under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as a
result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which
the corporation is a constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets
of the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures
of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall apply
as nearly as is practicable.
(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:
(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which appraisal rights are provided under this
section is to be submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the corporation, not less
than 20 days prior to the meeting, shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record
date for such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal rights are available pursuant to
subsection (b) or (c) hereof that appraisal rights are available for any or all of the shares of
the constituent corporations, and shall include in such notice a copy of this section. Each
stockholder electing to demand the appraisal of such stockholders shares shall deliver to the
corporation, before the taking of the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for
appraisal of such stockholders shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the
corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand
the appraisal of such stockholders shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or consolidation
shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to take such action must do so by a
separate written demand as herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of such merger
or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation shall notify each stockholder of each
constituent corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not voted in favor of or
consented to the merger or consolidation of the date that the merger or consolidation has become
effective; or
(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to §228 or §253 of this title, then
either a constituent corporation before the effective date of the merger or consolidation or the
surviving or resulting corporation within 10 days thereafter shall notify each of the holders of
any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation who are entitled to appraisal rights
of the approval of the merger or consolidation and that appraisal rights are available for any or
all shares of such class or series of stock of such constituent corporation, and shall include in
such notice a copy of this section. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the effective date
of the merger or consolidation, shall, also notify such stockholders of the effective date of the
merger or consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may, within 20 days after the
date of mailing of such notice, demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation the
appraisal of such holders shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the
corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand
the appraisal of such holders shares. If such notice did not notify stockholders of the effective
date of the merger or consolidation, either (i) each such constituent corporation shall send a
second notice before the effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each of the
holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation that are entitled to
appraisal rights of the effective date of the merger or consolidation or (ii) the surviving or
resulting corporation shall send such a second notice to all such holders on or within 10 days
after such effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is sent more than 20 days
following the sending of the first notice, such second notice need only be sent to each stockholder
who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded appraisal of such holders shares in
accordance with this subsection. An affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary or of the
transfer agent of the corporation that is required to give either notice that such notice has been
given shall, in the absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein. For
purposes of determining the stockholders entitled to receive either notice, each constituent
corporation may fix, in advance, a record date that shall be not more than 10 days prior to the
date the notice is given, provided, that if the notice is given on or after the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, the record date shall be such effective date. If no record date is
fixed and the notice is given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be the close of
business on the day next preceding the day on which the notice is given.
(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the surviving or
resulting corporation or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a) and (d) hereof and
who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court of Chancery
demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, at any time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any
stockholder shall have the right to withdraw such stockholders demand for appraisal and to accept
the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation. Within 120 days after the effective date of the
B-2
merger or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of subsections
(a) and (d) hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to receive from the corporation
surviving the merger or resulting from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate
number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or consolidation and with respect to which
demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such
written statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days after such stockholders
written request for such a statement is received by the surviving or resulting corporation or
within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal under
subsection (d) hereof, whichever is later.
(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder, service of a copy thereof shall be
made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after such service
file in the office of the Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list
containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares
and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or
resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the surviving or resulting corporation,
the petition shall be accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so
ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing of such
petition by registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting corporation and to the
stockholders shown on the list at the addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by
1 or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court deems
advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication shall be approved by the Court, and
the costs thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.
(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall determine the stockholders who have
complied with this section and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may require
the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by
certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon
of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such
direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder.
(h) After determining the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the Court shall appraise the
shares, determining their fair value exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation, together with a fair rate of
interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such
fair value, the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. In determining the fair rate of
interest, the Court may consider all relevant factors, including the rate of interest which the
surviving or resulting corporation would have had to pay to borrow money during the pendency of the
proceeding. Upon application by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder
entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, permit
discovery or other pretrial proceedings and may proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior to the
final determination of the stockholder entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears
on the list filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this
section and who has submitted such stockholders certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery,
if such is required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that
such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.
(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares, together with
interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto.
Interest may be simple or compound, as the Court may direct. Payment shall be so made to each such
stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of holders of
shares represented by certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the certificates
representing such stock. The Courts decree may be enforced as other decrees in the Court of
Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or resulting corporation be a corporation of this
State or of any state.
(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed upon the parties as
the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court may
order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal
proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees and the fees and expenses of
experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.
B-3
(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, no stockholder who has
demanded appraisal rights as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be entitled to vote
such stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock
(except dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date which is prior
to the effective date of the merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition for
an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in subsection (e) of this section, or if such
stockholder shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of such
stockholders demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation, either
within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation as provided in subsection
(e) of this section or thereafter with the written approval of the corporation, then the right of
such stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal
proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval
of the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just.
(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the shares of such objecting
stockholders would have been converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall have
the status of authorized and unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation.
B-4
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 20. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
As permitted by Section 102 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL,
International Coal Groups amended and restated certificate of incorporation will include a
provision that eliminates the personal liability of International Coal Groups directors for
monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director. International Coal Groups amended
and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws also provides that:
|
|
|
|
|
International Coal Group must
indemnify its directors and officers
to the fullest extent permitted by
Delaware law; |
|
|
|
|
|
International Coal Group may
advance expenses, as incurred, to its
directors and executive officers in
connection with a legal proceeding to
the fullest extent permitted by
Delaware Law; and |
|
|
|
|
|
International Coal Group may
indemnify its other employees and
agents to the same extent that
indemnified International Coal Groups
officers and directors, unless
otherwise determined by International
Coal Groups board of directors. |
Pursuant to Section 145(a) of the DGCL, we may indemnify any person who was or is a party or
is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding
(other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that the person
is or was a director, officer, agent or employee of International Coal Groups company or is or was
serving at International Coal Groups request as a director, officer, agent, or employee of another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including
attorneys fees, judgment, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by
the person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding. Pursuant to Section 145(b) of the
DGCL, the power to indemnify also applies to actions brought by or in the right of the corporation
as well, but only to the extent of defense expenses (including attorneys fees) actually and
reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or
suit. Pursuant to Section 145(b), we shall not indemnify any person in respect of any claim, issue
or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to us unless and only to
the extent that the Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was brought shall
determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the
circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such
expenses which the Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper. The power to indemnify
under Sections 145(a) and (b) of the DGCL applies (i) if such person is successful on the merits or
otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding, or (ii) if such person acted in good faith
and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in the best interest, or not opposed to the best
interest, of the corporation, and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no
reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.
Section 174 of the DGCL provides, among other things, that a director, who willfully or
negligently approves of an unlawful payment of dividends or an unlawful stock purchase or
redemption, may be held liable for such actions. A director who was either absent when the unlawful
actions were approved or dissented at the time, may avoid liability by causing his or her dissent
to such actions to be entered in the books containing the minutes of the meetings of the board of
directors at the time such action occurred or immediately after such absent director receives
notice of the unlawful acts.
The indemnification provisions contained in International Coal Groups amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and bylaws will not be exclusive of any other rights to which a person
may be entitled by law, agreement, vote of shareholders or disinterested directors or otherwise. In
addition, we will maintain insurance on behalf of International Coal Groups directors and
executive officers insuring them against any liability asserted against them in their capacities as
directors or officers or arising out of such status.
II-1
ITEM 21. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) Exhibits. The following is a list of Exhibits to this Registration Statement:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
Note |
2.1
|
|
Business Combination Agreement among International Coal Group, Inc., ICG Holdco,
Inc., ICG Merger Sub, Inc., Anker Merger Sub, Inc. and Anker Coal Group, Inc., dated
as of March 31, 2005
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Business Combination Agreement among International Coal
Group, Inc., ICG Holdco, Inc., ICG Merger Sub, Inc., Anker Merger Sub, Inc. and
Anker Coal Group, Inc., dated as of May 10, 2005
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Business Combination Agreement among International Coal Group, Inc., ICG Holdco,
Inc., CoalQuest merger Sub LLC, CoalQuest Development LLC and the members of
CoalQuest Development LLC dated as of March 31, 2005
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
First Amendment to the Business Combination Agreement among International Coal
Group, Inc., ICG Holdco, Inc., CoalQuest merger Sub LLC, CoalQuest Development LLC
and the members of CoalQuest Development LLC, dated as of May 10, 2005
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of International Coal Group, Inc.
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of International Coal Group, Inc.
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of certificate of International Coal Group, Inc. common stock
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement by and between International Coal Group, Inc., WLR
Recovery Fund II, L.P., Contrarian Capital Management LLC, Värde Partners, Inc.,
Greenlight Capital, Inc., and Stark Trading, Shepherd International Coal Holdings
Inc.
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form of Registration Rights Agreement between International Coal Group, Inc. and
certain former Anker stockholders and CoalQuest members
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Opinion of Jones Day
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 5, 2004 among ICG, LLC,
as Borrower, International Coal Group Inc., the guarantors party thereto, UBS
Securities LLC, as Arranger, Bookmanager and Syndication Agent, General Electric
Capital Corporation, as Documentation Agent, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Issuing
Bank, Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and UBS Loan Finance, LLC, as
Swingline Lender
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of November 30, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of November 5, 2004 among ICG, LLC, as Borrower, International
Coal Group Inc., the guarantors party thereto, UBS Securities LLC, as Arranger,
Bookmanager and Syndication Agent, General Electric Capital Corporation, as
Documentation Agent, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Issuing Bank, Administrative Agent
and Collateral Agent, and UBS Loan Finance, LLC, as Swingline Lender
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Security Agreement dated as of September 30, 2004 among ICG, LLC and the guarantors
party thereto and UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Collateral Agent
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Advisory Services Agreement effective as of October 1, 2004 between International
Coal Group, LLC and W.L. Ross & Co. LLC
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Employment Agreement dated March 14, 2005 by and between Bennett K. Hatfield and
International Coal Group, Inc.
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Employment Agreement dated April 25, 2005 by and between Roger L. Nicholson and
|
|
(B) |
II-2
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
Note |
|
|
International Coal Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Fee Lease between Kentucky Union Company, lessor, and ICG Hazard, LLC, lessee, of
Flint Ridge Surface Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Fee Lease between Pocahontas Development Corp., lessor, and ICG East Kentucky, LLC,
lessee, of Blackberry Creek Surface Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Coal Lease between N&G Holdings Company, lessor, and ICG Hazard, LLC, lessee, of
Vicco Surface Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Coal Lease between Knight-Ink Heirs, lessor, and ICG Eastern, LLC, lessee, of Birch
River Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Surface Lease between NGHD Land, et al., lessor, and ICG Eastern, LLC, lessee, of
Birch River Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Coal Lease between NGHD Land, et al., lessor, and ICG Eastern, LLC, lessee, of Birch
River Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Fee Lease between M-B, LLC, lessor, and ICG Eastern, LLC, lessee, of Birch River Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Fee Lease between ACIN (successor-in-interest to CSTL, LLC), lessor, and ICG Hazard,
LLC, lessee, of County Line and Rowdy Gap Mines
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Fee Lease between Kentucky River Properties, LLC, lessor, and ICG Hazard, LLC,
lessee, of Rowdy Gap and Thunder Ridge Mines
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Fee Lease between William Bach Marshall, et al., lessor, and ICG Hazard, LLC,
lessee, of the Flint Ridge preparation plant site
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Lease between Allegany Coal and Land Company, lessor, and Patriot Mining Company,
Inc., lessee, of Allegany County, Maryland Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Lease between The Crab Orchard Coal and Land Company, lessor, and Anker West
Virginia Mining Company, Beckley Smokeless Division, lessee, of Bay Hill Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Lease between Beaver Coal Corporation, lessor, and Anker West Virginia Mining
Company, Beckley Smokeless Division, of Bay Hill Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Lease between Douglas Coal Company, lessor, and Patriot Mining Company, Inc.,
lessee, of Island and Douglas Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Lease between Southern Region Industrial Realty, Inc., lessor, and Anker Virginia
Mining Company, Inc., lessee, of War Creek Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Sublease between Reserve Coal Properties, sublessors, and Patriot Mining Company,
sublessee, of Sycamore No. 2 Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Coal dated July 1, 1996,
between Carolina Power & Light Company and ICG, LLC (assigned from Mountaineer Coal
Development Company, d/b/a Marrowbone Development Company) and amended by:
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Letter Agreement dated and effective July 19, 1996 |
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Amendment 1 dated July 29, 1998, effective January 1, 1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Amendment 2 dated April 19, 1999, effective January 1, 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Letter Agreement dated and effective March 25, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
(e) Letter Agreement dated October 14, 2002, effective October 15, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
(f) Letter Agreement dated and effective July 28, 2003 |
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
Note |
|
|
(g) Amendment No. 3 dated July 28, 2003, effective January 1, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Agreement for Purchase and Sales of Coal dated April 10, 2003 and effective January
1, 2004, between Georgia Power Company and ICG, LLC (assigned from Horizon Natural
Resources Company)
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Contract for Sale and Purchase of Coal dated July 1, 1980, between City of
Springfield, Illinois and ICG, Illinois, LLC (assigned from Turis Coal Company),
amended by:
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Amendment dated March 4, 1986, effective January 1, 1986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Second Amendment dated April 22, 1986, effective January 1, 1986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Modification dated and effective June 8, 1987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Modification dated and effective November 4, 1988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) Amendment dated and effective January 1, 1989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) Amendment dated March 20, 1992, effective January 1, 1992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) Amendment dated March 21, 1995, effective January 1, 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) Amendment dated May 10, 1996, effective May 1, 1996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Amendment dated August 20, 1998, effective January 1, 1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j) Amendment dated May 30, 2001, effective January 1, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k) Letter dated October 8, 2004 assigning to ICG Illinois, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Coal Supply Agreement, dated as of April 1, 1992, between Anker Energy and Logan
Generating Company (formerly Keystone Energy Service Company, L.P.), amended by:
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) First Amendment, effective as of September 1, 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Second Amendment, effective as of March 15, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Third Amendment, effective as of October 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Coal Price Adjustment Agreement, effective as of October 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Coal Sales Agreement, date as of February 17, 2005, between Anker West Virginia
Mining Company, Inc. and Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC and Monongahela Power
Company
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Statement regarding computation of per share earnings
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Jones Day (included as part of its opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1 hereto)
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche, LLP
|
|
(D) |
|
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
Consent of Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc.
|
|
(D) |
|
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
(D) |
(A) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to International Coal Group, Inc.s Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-124393), filed on April 28, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
(B) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to International Coal Group, Inc.s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-124393), filed on June 15, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(C) |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
(D) |
|
Filed herewith. |
II-4
(b) Financial Statement Schedules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
II-6 |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
II-7 |
|
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.
|
|
II-8 |
Schedules other than that noted above are omitted because of an absence of other conditions under
which they are required or because the information required to be disclosed is presented in the
financial statements or notes thereto.
II-5
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors of
International Coal Group, Inc.
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of ICG, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company)
as of December 31, 2004 and for the period May 13, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004, and have
issued our report thereon dated April 22, 2005 (included elsewhere in this Registration Statement).
Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 16(b) of this Registration
Statement. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, the financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note A to the accompanying financial statement schedule, such schedule has been
restated.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
April 22, 2005 (June 8, 2005 as to the matter described in Note A to the schedule)
II-6
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors of
Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
We have audited the combined financial statements of Horizon NR, LLC and Certain Subsidiaries
(Combined Companies) as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (Reorganized Companies) and
for the period January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004, the year ended December 31, 2003, the period
May 10, 2002 to December 31, 2002 (Reorganized Companies), and for the period January 1, 2002 to
May 9, 2002 (Predecessor Companies), and have issued our report thereon dated March 25, 2005
(included elsewhere in this Registration Statement). Our audits also included the financial
statement schedule listed in Item 16(b) of this Registration Statement. This financial statement
schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note A to the accompanying financial statement schedule, such schedule has been
restated.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
April 22, 2005 (June 8, 2005 as to the matter described in Note A to the schedule)
II-7
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (As Restated, See Note A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
revenue, |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
beginning |
|
|
costs or |
|
|
additions |
|
|
Balance at |
|
Description |
|
of period |
|
|
expenses |
|
|
(deductions) |
|
|
end of period |
|
|
Period from May 13, 2004 to
December 31, 2004 (ICG, Inc.
period): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for inventory obsolescence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period ended September 30, 2004
(Predecessor Horizon): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
7,798 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
(3,947 |
)(1) |
|
|
5,441 |
|
Reserve for inventory obsolescence |
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
)(2) |
|
|
2,797 |
|
Allowance for doubtful Notes |
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,980 |
|
Reserve for lossAdvance Royalties |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003
(Predecessor Horizon): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
9,453 |
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
(540 |
)(1) |
|
|
7,798 |
|
Reserve for inventory obsolescence |
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
508 |
(2) |
|
|
2,803 |
|
Allowance for doubtful Notes |
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,422 |
|
Reserve for lossAdvance Royalties |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from May 10, 2002 to
December 31, 2002 (Predecessor
Horizon): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
7,918 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
(3) |
|
|
9,453 |
|
Reserve for inventory obsolescence |
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,485 |
|
Reserve for lossAdvance Royalties |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Allowance for doubtful Notes |
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from January 1, 2002 to
May 9, 2002 (Predecessor AEI): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
6,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,918 |
|
Reserve for inventory obsolescence |
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,244 |
(4) |
|
|
2,485 |
|
Reserve for lossAdvance Royalties |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Allowance for doubtful Notes |
|
|
1,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471 |
(5) |
|
|
2,451 |
|
(1) |
|
Reflects adjustment to allowance due to settlement of outstanding claims of predecessor. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects adjustment of reserve based on annual physical inventory counts. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects anticipated non-collection of balloon payment related to a lease agreement. |
|
(4) |
|
Reflects opening balance sheet adjustments. |
|
(5) |
|
Reflects reclass of excise tax attributable to export sales. |
Note A |
|
Amounts for the period from May 13, 2004 to
December 31, 2004 have been restated to correct the allocation of the purchase
price. Certain amounts in other periods have been reclassified between amounts
charged to revenues, costs or expenses, and other additions (deductions). |
ITEM 22. Undertakings.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
II-8
(a) |
|
To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective
amendment to this registration statement: |
(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the
registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or
in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration
statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered
(if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and
any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in
the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the
changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate
offering price set forth in the Calculation of Registration Fee table in the effective
registration statement; and
(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not
previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in
the registration statement.
(b) |
|
That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each
such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to
the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be
deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
|
(c) |
|
To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities
being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering. |
|
(d) |
|
That prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered hereunder through use of a
prospectus which is a part of this registration statement, by any person or party who is
deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c), the issuer undertakes that such
reoffering prospectus will contain the information called for by the applicable registration
form with respect to reofferings by persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the
information called for by the other items of the applicable form. |
|
(e) |
|
That every prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant to paragraph (d) above, or (ii) that
purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and is
used in connection with an offering of securities subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part
of an amendment to this registration statement and will not be used until such amendment has
become effective, and that, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at
that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
|
(f) |
|
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be
permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the
provisions described in Item 20, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the
opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim
for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of
expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in
the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director,
officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the
registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by
the final adjudication of such issue. |
|
(g) |
|
To respond to requests for information that is incorporated by reference into the prospectus
pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11 or 13 of this Form, within one business day of receipt of such
request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or other equally prompt
means. This includes information contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective
date of the registration statement through the date of responding to the request. |
|
(h) |
|
To supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction,
and the company being acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in
this registration statement when it became effective. |
II-9
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant has duly caused
this Form S-4 Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the city of Ashland, Kentucky, on June 27, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERNATIONAL COAL GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Bennett K. Hatfield
|
|
|
|
Bennett K. Hatfield |
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Form S-4 Registration Statement
has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Bennett K. Hatfield |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
|
|
June 27, 2005 |
Bennett K. Hatfield |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William D. Campbell
|
|
Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary
|
|
June 27, 2005 |
William D. Campbell |
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
June 27, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
June 27, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jon R. Bauer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
June 27, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cynthia B. Bezik |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
June 27, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Catacosinos |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marcia L. Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
June 27, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wendy L. Teramoto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By: |
/s/ William D. Campbell
|
|
|
|
As: Attorney-in-Fact |
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
Note |
2.1
|
|
Business Combination Agreement among International Coal Group, Inc., ICG Holdco,
Inc., ICG Merger Sub, Inc., Anker Merger Sub, Inc. and Anker Coal Group, Inc.,
dated as of March 31, 2005
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Business Combination Agreement among International Coal
Group, Inc., ICG Holdco, Inc., ICG Merger Sub, Inc., Anker Merger Sub, Inc. and
Anker Coal Group, Inc., dated as of May 10, 2005
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Business Combination Agreement among International Coal Group, Inc., ICG Holdco,
Inc., CoalQuest merger Sub LLC, CoalQuest Development LLC and the members of
CoalQuest Development LLC dated as of March 31, 2005
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
First Amendment to the Business Combination Agreement among International Coal
Group, Inc., ICG Holdco, Inc., CoalQuest merger Sub LLC, CoalQuest Development LLC
and the members of CoalQuest Development LLC, dated as of May 10, 2005
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of International Coal Group, Inc.
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of International Coal Group, Inc.
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of certificate of International Coal Group, Inc. common stock
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement by and between International Coal Group, Inc., WLR
Recovery Fund II, L.P., Contrarian Capital Management LLC, Värde Partners, Inc.,
Greenlight Capital, Inc., and Stark Trading, Shepherd International Coal Holdings
Inc.
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form of Registration Rights Agreement between International Coal Group, Inc. and
certain former Anker stockholders and CoalQuest members
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Opinion of Jones Day
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 5, 2004 among ICG, LLC,
as Borrower, International Coal Group Inc., the guarantors party thereto, UBS
Securities LLC, as Arranger, Bookmanager and Syndication Agent, General Electric
Capital Corporation, as Documentation Agent, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Issuing
Bank, Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and UBS Loan Finance, LLC, as
Swingline Lender
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of November 30, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of November 5, 2004 among ICG, LLC, as Borrower, International
Coal Group Inc., the guarantors party thereto, UBS Securities LLC, as Arranger,
Bookmanager and Syndication Agent, General Electric Capital Corporation, as
Documentation Agent, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Issuing Bank, Administrative
Agent and Collateral Agent, and UBS Loan Finance, LLC, as Swingline Lender
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Security Agreement dated as of September 30, 2004 among ICG, LLC and the
guarantors party thereto and UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Collateral Agent
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Advisory Services Agreement effective as of October 1, 2004 between International
Coal Group, LLC and W.L. Ross & Co. LLC
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Employment Agreement dated March 14, 2005 by and between Bennett K. Hatfield and
International Coal Group, Inc.
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Employment Agreement dated April 25, 2005 by and between Roger L. Nicholson and
International Coal Group, Inc.
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
Note |
10.7
|
|
Fee Lease between Kentucky Union Company, lessor, and ICG Hazard, LLC, lessee, of
Flint Ridge Surface Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Fee Lease between Pocahontas Development Corp., lessor, and ICG East Kentucky,
LLC, lessee, of Blackberry Creek Surface Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Coal Lease between N&G Holdings Company, lessor, and ICG Hazard, LLC, lessee, of
Vicco Surface Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Coal Lease between Knight-Ink Heirs, lessor, and ICG Eastern, LLC, lessee, of
Birch River Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Surface Lease between NGHD Land, et al., lessor, and ICG Eastern, LLC, lessee, of
Birch River Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Coal Lease between NGHD Land, et al., lessor, and ICG Eastern, LLC, lessee, of
Birch River Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Fee Lease between M-B, LLC, lessor, and ICG Eastern, LLC, lessee, of Birch River
Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Fee Lease between ACIN (successor-in-interest to CSTL, LLC), lessor, and ICG
Hazard, LLC, lessee, of County Line and Rowdy Gap Mines
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Fee Lease between Kentucky River Properties, LLC, lessor, and ICG Hazard, LLC,
lessee, of Rowdy Gap and Thunder Ridge Mines
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Fee Lease between William Bach Marshall, et al., lessor, and ICG Hazard, LLC,
lessee, of the Flint Ridge preparation plant site
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Lease between Allegany Coal and Land Company, lessor, and Patriot Mining Company,
Inc., lessee, of Allegany County, Maryland Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Lease between The Crab Orchard Coal and Land Company, lessor, and Anker West
Virginia Mining Company, Beckley Smokeless Division, lessee, of Bay Hill Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Lease between Beaver Coal Corporation, lessor, and Anker West Virginia Mining
Company, Beckley Smokeless Division, of Bay Hill Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Lease between Douglas Coal Company, lessor, and Patriot Mining Company, Inc.,
lessee, of Island and Douglas Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Lease between Southern Region Industrial Realty, Inc., lessor, and Anker Virginia
Mining Company, Inc., lessee, of War Creek Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Sublease between Reserve Coal Properties, sublessors, and Patriot Mining Company,
sublessee, of Sycamore No. 2 Mine
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Coal dated July 1, 1996,
between Carolina Power & Light Company and ICG, LLC (assigned from Mountaineer
Coal Development Company, d/b/a Marrowbone Development Company) and amended by:
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Letter Agreement dated and effective July 19, 1996 |
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Amendment 1 dated July 29, 1998, effective January 1, 1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Amendment 2 dated April 19, 1999, effective January 1, 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Letter Agreement dated and effective March 25, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
(e) Letter Agreement dated October 14, 2002, effective October 15, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
(f) Letter Agreement dated and effective July 28, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
Note |
|
|
(g) Amendment No. 3 dated July 28, 2003, effective January 1, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Agreement for Purchase and Sales of Coal dated April 10, 2003 and effective
January 1, 2004, between Georgia Power Company and ICG, LLC (assigned from Horizon
Natural Resources Company)
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Contract for Sale and Purchase of Coal dated July 1, 1980, between City of
Springfield, Illinois and ICG, Illinois, LLC (assigned from Turis Coal Company),
amended by:
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Amendment dated March 4, 1986, effective January 1, 1986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Second Amendment dated April 22, 1986, effective January 1, 1986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Modification dated and effective June 8, 1987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Modification dated and effective November 4, 1988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) Amendment dated and effective January 1, 1989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) Amendment dated March 20, 1992, effective January 1, 1992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) Amendment dated March 21, 1995, effective January 1, 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) Amendment dated May 10, 1996, effective May 1, 1996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Amendment dated August 20, 1998, effective January 1, 1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j) Amendment dated May 30, 2001, effective January 1, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k) Letter dated October 8, 2004 assigning to ICG Illinois, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Coal Supply Agreement, dated as of April 1, 1992, between Anker Energy and Logan
Generating Company (formerly Keystone Energy Service Company, L.P.), amended by:
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) First Amendment, effective as of September 1, 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Second Amendment, effective as of March 15, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Third Amendment, effective as of October 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Coal Price Adjustment Agreement, effective as of October 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Coal Sales Agreement, date as of February 17, 2005, between Anker West Virginia
Mining Company, Inc. and Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC and Monongahela
Power Company
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Statement regarding computation of per share earnings
|
|
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Jones Day (included as part of its opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1 hereto)
|
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche, LLP
|
|
(D) |
|
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
Consent of Marshall Miller & Associates, Inc.
|
|
(D) |
|
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
(D) |
(A) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to International Coal Group, Inc.s Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-124393), filed on April 28, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
(B) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to International Coal Group, Inc.s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-124393), filed on June 15, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(C) |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
(D) |
|
Filed herewith. |