Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010
Commission File Number: 001-32739
HealthSpring, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
20-1821898
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
9009 Carothers Parkway
Suite 501
Franklin, Tennessee
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
37067
(Zip Code) |
(615) 291-7000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at April 26, 2010 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share
|
|
57,942,898 Shares |
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1: |
|
Financial Statements. |
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
294,133 |
|
|
$ |
439,423 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
152,081 |
|
|
|
92,442 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,965 |
|
Funds due for the benefit of members |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,028 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
6,973 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
8,717 |
|
|
|
9,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
459,016 |
|
|
|
575,300 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
95,310 |
|
|
|
13,574 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
45,072 |
|
|
|
38,463 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
29,451 |
|
|
|
30,316 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
624,507 |
|
|
|
624,507 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
198,666 |
|
|
|
203,147 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
19,775 |
|
|
|
16,375 |
|
Risk corridor receivable from CMS |
|
|
19,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
14,047 |
|
|
|
6,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,505,792 |
|
|
$ |
1,508,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical claims liability |
|
$ |
197,884 |
|
|
$ |
202,308 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other |
|
|
55,726 |
|
|
|
50,954 |
|
Risk corridor payable to CMS |
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
|
2,176 |
|
Funds held for the benefit of members |
|
|
26,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
43,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
299,681 |
|
|
|
298,507 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
157,500 |
|
|
|
193,904 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
75,594 |
|
|
|
80,434 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
5,836 |
|
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
538,611 |
|
|
|
578,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see notes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 180,000,000 shares authorized, 61,159,946 issued and 57,943,648
outstanding at March 31, 2010, and 60,758,958 shares issued and 57,560,350 shares outstanding at
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
551,675 |
|
|
|
548,481 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
462,566 |
|
|
|
428,765 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss), net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,216,298 shares at March 31, 2010, and 3,198,608 shares at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
(47,673 |
) |
|
|
(47,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
967,181 |
|
|
|
929,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,505,792 |
|
|
$ |
1,508,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue |
|
$ |
749,378 |
|
|
$ |
634,596 |
|
Management and other fees |
|
|
10,188 |
|
|
|
9,969 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
760,442 |
|
|
|
646,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical expense |
|
|
612,519 |
|
|
|
529,600 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
76,530 |
|
|
|
72,250 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,787 |
|
|
|
7,524 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9,971 |
|
|
|
4,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
706,807 |
|
|
|
613,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
53,635 |
|
|
|
32,460 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(19,834 |
) |
|
|
(11,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
33,801 |
|
|
$ |
20,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
57,224,467 |
|
|
|
54,481,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
57,557,961 |
|
|
|
54,781,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
33,801 |
|
|
$ |
20,612 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,787 |
|
|
|
7,524 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
2,904 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing cost |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
Amortization on bond investments |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(2,611 |
) |
|
|
(2,769 |
) |
Write-off of deferred financing fees |
|
|
5,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax shortfall from share awards |
|
|
(1,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in cash and cash equivalents due to changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(59,639 |
) |
|
|
(33,116 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(4,742 |
) |
|
|
(1,437 |
) |
Medical claims liability |
|
|
(4,424 |
) |
|
|
21,674 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities |
|
|
5,566 |
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
Risk corridor payable to/receivable from CMS |
|
|
(19,929 |
) |
|
|
(12,314 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(34,913 |
) |
|
|
8,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(2,441 |
) |
|
|
(2,819 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities |
|
|
(120,468 |
) |
|
|
(18,247 |
) |
Maturities of investment securities |
|
|
8,211 |
|
|
|
8,700 |
|
Sales of investment securities |
|
|
46,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of restricted investments |
|
|
(10,948 |
) |
|
|
(6,583 |
) |
Maturities of restricted investments |
|
|
7,548 |
|
|
|
6,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(71,992 |
) |
|
|
(12,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds received for the benefit of the members |
|
|
207,005 |
|
|
|
159,711 |
|
Funds withdrawn for the benefit of members |
|
|
(176,601 |
) |
|
|
(122,777 |
) |
Proceeds received on issuance of debt |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(261,972 |
) |
|
|
(9,497 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from stock options exercised |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Payment of debt issue costs |
|
|
(7,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(38,385 |
) |
|
|
27,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(145,290 |
) |
|
|
22,623 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
439,423 |
|
|
|
282,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
294,133 |
|
|
$ |
304,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
4,271 |
|
|
$ |
3,663 |
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
3,464 |
|
|
$ |
1,931 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) Organization and Basis of Presentation
HealthSpring, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), was organized in October 2004 and
began operations in March 2005 in connection with a recapitalization transaction accounted for as a
purchase. The Company is a managed care organization whose primary focus is on Medicare, the
federal government sponsored health insurance program for United States citizens aged 65 and older,
qualifying disabled persons, and persons suffering from end-stage renal disease. Through its health
maintenance organization (HMO) and regulated insurance subsidiaries, the Company operates
Medicare Advantage health plans in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Mississippi,
Tennessee, and Texas and offers Medicare Part D prescription drug plans on a national basis. The
Company also provides management services to physician practices.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and should be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of HealthSpring, Inc.
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) on February 11, 2010 (the 2009 Form 10-K).
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the Companys
financial position as of March 31, 2010, the Companys results of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and cash flows for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Certain 2009 amounts have
been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Accordingly, certain information
and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements prepared in accordance
with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations applicable to
interim financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (including normally recurring accruals)
necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position at March 31, 2010, its results of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and its cash flows for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
The results of operations for the 2010 interim period are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2010.
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements requires management of the
Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amount of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. The most
significant item subject to estimates and assumptions is the actuarial calculation for obligations
related to medical claims. Other significant items subject to estimates and assumptions include the
Companys estimated risk adjustment payments receivable from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS), the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, the useful life of
definite-lived intangible assets, the valuation of debt securities carried at fair value, and
certain amounts recorded related to the Companys Part D operations. Actual results could differ
significantly from those estimates and assumptions.
The Companys regulated insurance subsidiaries are restricted from making distributions
without appropriate regulatory notifications and approvals or to the extent such distributions
would cause non-compliance with statutory capital requirements. At March 31, 2010, $378.7 million
of the Companys $454.3 million of cash, cash equivalents, investment securities, and restricted
investments were held by the Companys insurance subsidiaries and subject to these dividend
restrictions.
4
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(2) Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new guidance for
determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity (VIE) and requires an enterprise to
perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it a
controlling financial interest in a VIE. The guidance requires an enterprise to assess whether it
has an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a VIE operates as designed when determining
whether it has power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance. The guidance also requires ongoing assessments of whether an
enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, requires enhanced disclosures, and eliminates the
scope exclusion for qualifying special-purpose entities. The adoption of the new guidance on
January 1, 2010 did not impact our financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the FASBs updated guidance related to fair
value measurements and disclosures, which requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the
amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to
describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, in the reconciliation for fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs, or Level 3, a reporting entity should disclose
separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. The updated guidance also
requires that an entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets
and liabilities and disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair
value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements for Level 2 and Level 3 fair
value measurements. The guidance is effective for interim or annual financial reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and
settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal
years. Therefore, the Company has not yet adopted the guidance with respect to the roll forward
activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of the updated guidance for Levels 1 and
2 fair value measurements did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated results of
operations or financial condition.
(3) Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Medicare premium receivables |
|
$ |
74,942 |
|
|
$ |
48,524 |
|
Rebates |
|
|
61,638 |
|
|
|
34,879 |
|
Due from providers |
|
|
17,594 |
|
|
|
10,320 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,813 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,987 |
|
|
|
96,123 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
(3,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
157,552 |
|
|
$ |
92,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare premium receivables at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 include $79.2 million
and $44.1 million, respectively, of receivables from CMS related to the accrual of retroactive
risk adjustment payments (including $5.5 million and -0-, respectively, classified as
non-current and included in other assets on the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet).
Medicare premium receivables at March 31, 2010 also includes approximately $4.8 million of
credit balances for premium overpayments owed to CMS. Similar amounts at December 31, 2009 were
not significant. Accounts receivable relating to unpaid health plan enrollee premiums are
recorded during the period the Company is obligated to provide services to enrollees and do not
bear interest. The Company does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its
health plan enrollees.
Rebates for drug costs represent estimated rebates owed to the Company from prescription drug
companies. The Company has entered into contracts with certain drug manufacturers that provide for
rebates to the Company based on the utilization of specific prescription drugs by the Companys
members. Due from providers primarily includes management fees receivable as well as amounts owed
to the Company for the refund of certain medical expenses paid by the Company under risk sharing
agreements.
5
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(4) Investment Securities
Investment securities, which consist primarily of debt securities, have been categorized as
either available for sale or held to maturity. Held to maturity securities are those securities
that the Company does not intend to sell, nor expect to be required to sell, prior to maturity. The
Company holds no trading securities. At March 31, 2010, investment securities are classified as
non-current assets based on the Companys intention to reinvest such assets upon sale or maturity
and to not use such assets in current operations. At December 31, 2009 the Company classified its
investment securities based upon maturity dates. Restricted investments include U.S. Government
securities, money market fund investments, deposits and certificates of deposit held by the various
state departments of insurance to whose jurisdiction the Companys subsidiaries are subject. These
restricted assets are recorded at amortized cost and classified as long-term regardless of the
contractual maturity date because of the restrictive nature of the states requirements.
Available for sale securities are recorded at fair value. Held to maturity debt securities are
recorded at amortized cost, adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts.
Unrealized gains and losses (net of applicable deferred taxes) on available for sale securities are
included as a component of stockholders equity and comprehensive income until realized from a sale
or other than temporary impairment. Realized gains and losses from the sale of securities are
determined on a specific identification basis. Purchases and sales of investments are recorded on
their trade dates. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned.
There were no available for sale securities classified as current assets as of March 31, 2010.
Available for sale securities classified as current assets at December 31, 2009 were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
8,691 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities classified as non-current assets were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Government obligations |
|
$ |
2,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency obligations |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
29,931 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
29,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities (Residential) |
|
|
17,036 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
16,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other structured securities |
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
40,262 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
40,413 |
|
|
|
13,407 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
13,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95,310 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
95,310 |
|
|
$ |
13,407 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
13,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
There were no held to maturity securities classified as current assets at March 31, 2010.
Held to maturity securities classified as current assets at December 31, 2009 were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Government obligations |
|
$ |
1,154 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
Agency obligations |
|
|
3,225 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,241 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
6,416 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,490 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,965 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity securities classified as non-current assets were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Government obligations |
|
$ |
1,421 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency obligations |
|
|
3,173 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,622 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
17,302 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,697 |
|
|
|
13,505 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,830 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities (Residential) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
23,176 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,819 |
|
|
|
21,773 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
22,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,072 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,149 |
|
|
$ |
38,463 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
39,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no realized gains or losses on maturities of investment securities for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Maturities of investments were as follows at March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
8,688 |
|
|
|
8,812 |
|
|
$ |
10,675 |
|
|
|
10,840 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
49,184 |
|
|
|
49,133 |
|
|
|
29,260 |
|
|
|
29,940 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
7,346 |
|
|
|
7,348 |
|
|
|
5,137 |
|
|
|
5,369 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
9,450 |
|
|
|
9,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
20,642 |
|
|
|
20,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95,310 |
|
|
|
95,310 |
|
|
$ |
45,072 |
|
|
|
46,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Gross unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair value of the related
securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have
been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2010, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Government obligations |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
2,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
2,269 |
|
Agency obligations |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2,197 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
20,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
20,650 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities (Residential) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
14,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
14,984 |
|
Other structured securities |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
2,530 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
18,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
18,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(292 |
) |
|
|
61,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
61,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair value of the related
securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have
been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2009, were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company reviews fixed maturities and equity securities with a decline in fair value
from cost for impairment based on criteria that include duration and severity of decline; financial
viability and outlook of the issuer; and changes in the regulatory, economic and market environment
of the issuers industry or geographic region.
All issuers of securities the Company owned in an unrealized loss as of March 31, 2010 remain
current on all contractual payments. The unrealized losses on investments were caused by an
increase in investment yields as a result of a widening of credit spreads. The contractual terms of
these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the
amortized cost of the investment. The Company determined that it did not intend to sell these
investments and that it was not more-likely-than-not to be required to sell these investments prior
to their recovery, thus these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
(5) Fair Value Measurements
The Companys 2010 first quarter condensed consolidated balance sheet includes the following
financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, investment securities,
restricted investments, accounts payable, medical claims liabilities, interest rate swap
agreements, funds due (held) from CMS for the benefit of members, and long-term debt. The carrying
amounts of accounts receivable, funds due (held) from CMS for the benefit of members, accounts
payable, and medical claims liabilities approximate their fair value because of the relatively
short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization.
The fair value of the Companys long-term debt (including the current portion) was $173.3 million
at March 31, 2010 and consisted solely of non-tradable bank debt.
Cash and cash equivalents consist of such items as certificates of deposit, commercial paper,
and money market funds. The original cost of these assets approximates fair value due to their
short-term maturity. In February 2010, the Company terminated its interest rate swap agreements in
connection with the termination of the related credit agreement. See Note 12 Debt. The fair
value of the Companys interest rate swaps at December 31, 2009 reflected a liability of
approximately $2.1 million and was included in other long term liabilities in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet. The fair values of available for sale securities is
determined by pricing models developed using market data provided by a third party vendor.
8
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The following are the levels of the hierarchy as and a brief description of the type of
valuation information (inputs) that qualifies a financial asset for each level:
|
|
|
Level Input |
|
Input Definition |
Level I
|
|
Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets
at the measurement date. |
|
|
|
Level II
|
|
Inputs other than quoted prices included in
Level I that are observable for the asset or
liability through corroboration with market data
at the measurement date. |
|
|
|
Level III
|
|
Unobservable inputs that reflect
managements best estimate of what market
participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability at the measurement date. |
When quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are available, the Company uses
these quoted market prices to determine the fair value of financial assets and classifies these
assets as Level I. In other cases where a quoted market price for identical assets in an active
market is either not available or not observable, the Company obtains the fair value from a third
party vendor that uses pricing models, such as matrix pricing, to determine fair value. These
financial assets would then be classified as Level II. In the event quoted market prices were not
available, the Company would determine fair value using broker quotes or an internal analysis of
each investments financial statements and cash flow projections. In these instances, financial
assets would be classified based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the
valuation. Thus, financial assets might be classified in Level III even though there could be some
significant inputs that may be readily available.
There were no transfers to or from Levels I and II during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
The following tables summarize fair value measurements by level at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
294,133 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
294,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: available for sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government obligations |
|
$ |
397 |
|
|
$ |
1,873 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,270 |
|
Agency obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,860 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities (Residential) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,968 |
|
Other structured securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
397 |
|
|
$ |
94,913 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
95,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
439,423 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
439,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments:
available for sale securities:
Municipal securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22,457 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(6) Medical Liabilities
The Companys medical liabilities at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Medicare medical liabilities |
|
$ |
163,818 |
|
|
$ |
156,660 |
|
Pharmacy liabilities |
|
|
34,066 |
|
|
|
45,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
197,884 |
|
|
$ |
202,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) Medicare Part D
Total Part D related net assets (excluding medical claims payable) of $1.9 million at December 31,
2009 all relate to the 2009 CMS plan year. The Companys Part D related assets and liabilities
(excluding medical claims payable) at March 31, 2010 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to the |
|
|
Related to the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 plan year |
|
|
2010 plan year |
|
|
Total |
|
Current assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds due (held) for the benefit of members |
|
$ |
4,267 |
|
|
$ |
(30,643 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk corridor payable to CMS |
|
$ |
(2,195 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk corridor receivable from CMS |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,948 |
|
|
$ |
19,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances associated with risk corridor amounts are expected to be settled in the second half
of the year following the year to which they relate. Current year Part D amounts are routinely
updated in subsequent periods as a result of retroactivity.
(8) Derivatives
In October 2008, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements in a total
notional amount of $100.0 million, relating to the floating interest rate component of the term
loan agreement under its previous credit facility (collectively, the 2007 Credit Agreement). In
February 2010, the Company terminated its interest rate swap agreements in connection with the
termination of the 2007 Credit Agreement. See Note 12 Debt. The interest rate swap agreements were
classified as cash flow hedges. See Note 5 Fair Value Measurements.
All derivatives were recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. To the extent that
the cash flow hedges are effective, changes in their fair value were recorded in other
comprehensive income (loss) until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows of the
hedged transaction (e.g. until periodic settlements of a variable asset or liability are recorded
in earnings). Any hedge ineffectiveness (which represents the amount by which the changes in the
fair value of the derivatives differ from changes in the fair value of the hedged instrument) was
recorded in current-period earnings. As a result of terminating the interest rate swap agreements,
the Company settled the swap obligations with the counterparties for approximately $2.0 million and
reclassified such amount from other comprehensive income to interest expense during the three
months ended March 31, 2010.
10
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The Company had no derivative financial instruments outstanding at March 31, 2010. A summary
of the aggregate notional amounts, balance sheet location and estimated fair values of derivative
financial instruments at December 31, 2009 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
Hedging instruments |
|
Amount |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Asset |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,066 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the effect of cash flow hedges on the Companys financial statements for the periods
presented is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statement |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax Hedge |
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
Reclassified |
|
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified |
|
|
from |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
from Accumulated |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Location of |
|
|
Hedge Gain |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
Type of Cash Flow Hedge |
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Recognized |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
(1,253 |
) |
|
None |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
None |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9) Intangible Assets
A breakdown of the identifiable intangible assets and their assigned value and accumulated
amortization at March 31, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Trade name |
|
$ |
24,497 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,497 |
|
Noncompete agreements |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provider network |
|
|
137,069 |
|
|
|
24,433 |
|
|
|
112,636 |
|
Medicare member network |
|
|
93,620 |
|
|
|
33,150 |
|
|
|
60,470 |
|
Management contract right |
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
257,541 |
|
|
$ |
58,875 |
|
|
$ |
198,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense on identifiable intangible assets for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 was approximately $4.5 million and $4.6 million, respectively.
11
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(10) Share-Based Compensation
Stock Options
The Company granted options to purchase 535,712 shares of common stock pursuant to the 2006
Equity Incentive Plan during the three months ended March 31, 2010. Options for the purchase of
315,783 shares of common stock either were forfeited or expired during the three months ended March
31, 2010. Options for the purchase of 4,082,403 shares of common stock were outstanding under this
plan at March 31, 2010. The outstanding options vest and become exercisable based on time,
generally over a four-year period, and expire ten years from their grant dates.
Restricted Stock
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company granted 340,945 shares of restricted
stock to employees pursuant to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, the restrictions of which generally
lapse over a four-year period. Additionally, 35,043 shares were purchased by certain executives
pursuant to the Management Stock Purchase Plan (the MSPP). The restrictions on shares purchased
under the MSPP generally lapse on the second anniversary of the grant date. Unvested restricted
stock at March 31, 2010 totaled 613,019 shares.
(11) Net Income Per Common Share
The following table presents the calculation of the Companys net income per common share
basic and diluted (in thousands, except share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
33,801 |
|
|
$ |
20,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
57,224,467 |
|
|
|
54,481,835 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
132,534 |
|
|
|
77,373 |
|
Dilutive effect of unvested restricted shares |
|
|
200,960 |
|
|
|
222,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
57,557,961 |
|
|
|
54,781,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (EPS) reflects the potential dilution that could occur from
outstanding equity plan awards, including unexercised stock options and unvested restricted shares.
The dilutive effect is computed using the treasury stock method, which assumes all share-based
awards are exercised and the hypothetical proceeds from exercise are used by the Company to
purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. The incremental shares
(difference between shares assumed to be issued versus purchased), to the extent they would have
been dilutive, are included in the denominator of the diluted EPS calculation. Options with
respect to 4.1 million shares and 4.2 million shares were antidilutive and therefore excluded from
the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
12
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(12) Debt
Long-term debt at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Credit agreement |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
236,973 |
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(17,500 |
) |
|
|
(43,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt less current portion |
|
$ |
157,500 |
|
|
$ |
193,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On February 11, 2010, the Company entered into a $350.0 million credit agreement (the New
Credit Agreement), which, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, provides for a
five-year $175.0 million term loan credit facility and a four-year $175.0 million revolving credit
facility (the New Credit Facilities). Proceeds from the New Credit Facilities, together with cash
on hand, were used to fund the repayment of $237.0 million in term loans outstanding under the
Companys 2007 credit agreement as well as transaction expenses related thereto.
Borrowings under the New Credit Agreement accrue interest on the basis of either a base rate
or a LIBOR rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin depending on the Companys debt-to-EBITDA
leverage ratio (initially 325 basis points for LIBOR borrowings). The Company also pays a
commitment fee of 0.500% per annum, which may be reduced to 0.375% if certain leverage ratios are
achieved, on the actual daily unused portions of the New Credit Facilities. The revolving credit
facility under the New Credit Agreement matures, the commitments thereunder terminate, and all
amounts then outstanding thereunder will be payable on February 11, 2014.
The term loans under the New Credit Agreement are payable in equal quarterly principal
installments aggregating 10% of the aggregate initial principal amount of the term loans in the
first year, with the remaining outstanding principal balance of the term loans being payable in
equal quarterly installments aggregating 10%, 10%, 15%, and 55% in the second, third, fourth, and
fifth years, respectively. The net proceeds from certain asset sales, casualty/condemnation events,
and certain incurrences of indebtedness (subject, in the cases of asset sales and
casualty/condemnation events, to certain reinvestment rights), and a portion of the net proceeds
from equity issuances and, under certain circumstances, the Companys excess cash flow, are
required to be used to make prepayments in respect of loans outstanding under the New Credit
Facilities. The term loans made under the New Credit Agreement mature, and all amounts then
outstanding thereunder will be payable on February 11, 2015.
In connection with entering into the New Credit Agreement, the Company wrote-off unamortized
deferred financing costs of approximately $5.1 million incurred in connection with the 2007 Credit
Agreement. The Company also terminated its outstanding interest rate swap agreements, which
resulted in a payment of approximately $2.0 million to the swap counterparties. Such amounts are
reflected as interest expense in the financial results of the Company for the quarter ending March
31, 2010.
(13) Comprehensive Income
The following table presents details supporting the determination of comprehensive income for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
33,801 |
|
|
$ |
20,612 |
|
Net unrealized (loss) gain on available
for sale investment securities, net of tax |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
124 |
|
Net gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Reclass of accumulated other comprehensive
income on interest rate swap termination
(1) |
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
$ |
34,846 |
|
|
$ |
20,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income balances related to interest rate swap derivatives
were reclassified to interest expense and recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2010.
See Note 8, Derivatives. |
13
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(14) Segment Information
The Company reports its business in three segments: Medicare Advantage, stand-alone PDP, and
Corporate. Medicare Advantage (MA-PD) consists of Medicare-eligible beneficiaries receiving
healthcare benefits, including prescription drugs, through a coordinated care plan qualifying under
Part C and Part D of the Medicare Program. Stand-alone PDP consists of Medicare-eligible
beneficiaries receiving prescription drug benefits on a stand-alone basis in accordance with
Medicare Part D. The Corporate segment consists primarily of corporate expenses not allocated to
the other reportable segments. These segment groupings are also consistent with information used by
the Companys chief executive officer in making operating decisions.
The accounting policies of each segment are the same and are described in Note 1 to the 2009
Form 10-K. The results of each segment are measured and evaluated by earnings before interest
expense, depreciation and amortization expense, and income taxes (EBITDA). The Company does not
allocate certain corporate overhead amounts (classified as selling, general and administrative
expenses) or interest expense to the segments. The Company evaluates interest expense, income
taxes, and asset and liability details on a consolidated basis as these items are managed in a
corporate shared service environment and are not the responsibility of segment operating
management.
Revenue includes premium revenue, management and other fee income, and investment income.
Asset and equity details by reportable segment have not been disclosed, as the Company does
not internally report such information.
Financial data by reportable segment for the three months ended March 31 is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MA-PD |
|
|
PDP |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
630,950 |
|
|
$ |
129,476 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
760,442 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
82,451 |
|
|
|
(4,763 |
) |
|
|
(6,295 |
) |
|
|
71,393 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
6,192 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
7,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
553,485 |
|
|
$ |
92,618 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
646,115 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
51,978 |
|
|
|
(1,046 |
) |
|
|
(6,667 |
) |
|
|
44,265 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
6,356 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
7,524 |
|
As of January 1, 2010, the company revised its methodology for allocating selling, general,
and administrative expenses within its prescription drug operations to its MA-PD and PDP segments,
which resulted in allocating a greater share of such expenses to its PDP segments. As a result of
these revisions, the segment EBITDA amounts for the 2009 period include reclassification
adjustments between segments such that the periods presented are comparable.
A reconciliation of reportable segment EBITDA to net income included in the consolidated
statements of income for the three months ended March 31 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
71,393 |
|
|
$ |
44,265 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(19,834 |
) |
|
|
(11,848 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,971 |
) |
|
|
(4,281 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(7,787 |
) |
|
|
(7,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
33,801 |
|
|
$ |
20,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company uses segment EBITDA as an analytical indicator for purposes of assessing segment
performance, as is common in the healthcare industry. Segment EBITDA should not be considered as a
measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles and segment EBITDA,
as presented, may not be comparable to other companies.
14
|
|
|
Item 2: |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. |
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report and our
audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31,
2009, appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K that was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on February 11, 2010 (the 2009 Form 10-K). Statements contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements that the
company intends to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements
contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are predictive
in nature, that depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as
anticipates, believes, could, estimates, expects, intends, may, plans, potential,
predicts, projects, should, will, would, and similar expressions are forward-looking
statements.
The company cautions that forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to
be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied
by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with
respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. Given
these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
In evaluating any forward-looking statement, you should specifically consider the information
set forth under the captions Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Item 1A. Risk
Factors in the 2009 Form 10-K and the information set forth under Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements in our earnings and other press releases, as well as other cautionary
statements contained elsewhere in this report, including the matters discussed in Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates and Item 1A. Risk Factors. We undertake no obligation beyond
that required by law to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new
information becomes available or other events occur in the future. You should read this report and
the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits to this report completely
and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we
expect.
Overview
General
HealthSpring, Inc. (the company or HealthSpring) is one of the countrys largest
coordinated care plans whose primary focus is Medicare, the federal government-sponsored health
insurance program for U.S. citizens aged 65 and older, qualifying disabled persons, and persons
suffering from end-stage renal disease. We operate Medicare Advantage plans in Alabama, Florida,
Georgia, Illinois, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Texas and offer Medicare Part D prescription drug
plans on a national basis. The company also provides management services to physician practices. We
sometimes refer to our Medicare Advantage plans, including plans providing prescription drug
benefits, or MA-PD, collectively as Medicare Advantage plans and our stand-alone prescription
drug plan as our PDP. For purposes of additional analysis, the company provides membership and
certain financial information, including premium revenue and medical expense, for our Medicare
Advantage (including MA-PD) and PDP plans.
Medicare premiums, including premiums paid to our PDP, account for substantially all of our
revenue. As a consequence, our profitability is dependent on government funding levels for
Medicare programs. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is the federal agency
responsible for overseeing the Medicare program. The companys Tennessee Medicare Advantage plan is
currently undergoing an audit by CMS relating to compliance with CMSs risk score coding
requirements (herein, the RADV Audit). In February 2010, the company responded to the RADV Audit
information request, including retrieving and providing medical records that support diagnosis
codes and risk scores relating to 2006 dates of service and 2007 plan premiums. The company is
currently unable to predict the outcome of the RADV Audit, or predict the amount of premiums, if
any, that may be subject to repayment by the Tennessee plan to CMS.
Recent health
insurance reform, as embodied in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act
(collectively, “PPACA”) signed by the President into law in
March 2010, is projected to result in a reduction in federal spending on
the Medicare Advantage program. The reduction is estimated by the Congressional
Budget Office to be $134.9 billion and by CMS to be $145 billion over
the next 10 years. Medicare premiums, including premiums paid to our PDP,
account for substantially all of our revenue. Our revenue and, most likely, our
profitability are directly dependent on government funding levels for Medicare
programs. In addition to Medicare Advantage funding cuts, PPACA reduces
enrollment periods, establishes minimum MLRs, ties certain rate and rebate
benefits to quality ratings, and imposes federal premium taxes. These changes
may have a significant adverse impact on our business, including member growth
prospects and financial results. See “Part II — Item 1A.
Risk Factors.” Most of the provisions of PPACA that are material to our
business phase in over a number of years and regulations defining and
implementing key provisions of PPACA applicable to us are not yet developed.
Consequently, we are currently unable to predict with any reasonable certainty
or otherwise quantify the likely impact of PPACA on our business model,
financial condition, or results of operations.
We report our business in three segments: Medicare Advantage; PDP; and Corporate. The
following discussion of our results of operations includes a discussion of revenue and certain
expenses by reportable segment. See Segment Information below for additional information
related thereto.
15
Results of Operations
The consolidated results of operations include the accounts of HealthSpring and its
subsidiaries. The following table sets forth the consolidated statements of income data expressed
in dollars (in thousands) and as a percentage of total revenue for each period indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue |
|
$ |
749,378 |
|
|
|
98.6 |
% |
|
$ |
634,596 |
|
|
|
98.2 |
% |
Management and other fees |
|
|
10,188 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
9,969 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
760,442 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
646,115 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical expense |
|
|
612,519 |
|
|
|
80.6 |
|
|
|
529,600 |
|
|
|
82.0 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
76,530 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
72,250 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,787 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
7,524 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9,971 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
4,281 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
706,807 |
|
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
613,655 |
|
|
|
95.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
53,635 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
32,460 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
19,834 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
33,801 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
$ |
20,612 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership
Our primary source of revenue is monthly premium payments we receive based on membership
enrolled in Medicare. The following table summarizes our membership as of the dates specified:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Medicare Advantage Membership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
|
|
31,170 |
|
|
|
31,330 |
|
|
|
29,385 |
|
Florida |
|
|
35,093 |
|
|
|
32,606 |
|
|
|
29,978 |
|
Georgia |
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois |
|
|
11,548 |
|
|
|
11,261 |
|
|
|
10,067 |
|
Mississippi |
|
|
5,134 |
|
|
|
4,591 |
|
|
|
3,419 |
|
Tennessee |
|
|
63,505 |
|
|
|
58,252 |
|
|
|
53,833 |
|
Texas |
|
|
48,298 |
|
|
|
51,201 |
|
|
|
48,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
195,365 |
|
|
|
189,241 |
|
|
|
175,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare PDP Membership |
|
|
389,561 |
|
|
|
313,045 |
|
|
|
286,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare Advantage. Our Medicare Advantage membership increased by 11.5% to 195,365 members
at March 31, 2010, as compared to 175,138 members at March 31, 2009, with membership gains in all
our health plans except our Texas plan. Our Medicare Advantage net membership gain of 20,227
members since March 31, 2009 reflects both focused sales and marketing efforts through the annual
open enrollment and election periods and better retention rates resulting from, we believe, the
relative attractiveness of our various plans benefits. Effective as of January 1, 2010, we also
began operating Medicare Advantage plans in three counties in Northern Georgia. We currently
anticipate small but incremental Medicare Advantage membership growth throughout the remainder of
2010 through the offering of products to beneficiaries whose enrollment is not restricted by
lock-in rules, including age-ins, dual-eligibles, and beneficiaries eligible for one of our special
needs plans (SNPs).
16
PDP. PDP membership increased by 35.8% to 389,561 members at March 31, 2010 as compared to
286,810 at March 31, 2009, primarily as a result of the auto-assignment of members at the beginning
of the year. We do not actively market our PDPs and have relied on CMS auto-assignments of
dual-eligible beneficiaries for membership. We remained qualified to receive auto-assigned PDP
membership in 24 of 34 CMS PDP regions for 2010 although the regions changed slightly. We have
continued to receive assignments or otherwise enroll dual-eligible beneficiaries in our PDP plans
during lock-in and expect incremental growth for the balance of the year.
Comparison of the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2010 to the Three-Month Period Ended March 31,
2009
Revenue
Total revenue was $760.4 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 as compared
with $646.1 million for the same period in 2009, representing an increase of $114.3 million, or
17.7%. The significant components of revenue were as follows:
Premium Revenue: Total premium revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $749.4
million as compared with $634.6 million in the same period in 2009, representing an increase of
$114.8 million, or 18.1%. The primary components of premium revenue and the primary reasons for
changes were as follows:
|
|
|
Medicare Advantage: Medicare Advantage (including MA-PD) premiums were $619.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 versus $541.4 million in the first quarter of 2009,
representing an increase of $78.0 million, or 14.4%. The increase in Medicare Advantage
premiums in 2010 is primarily attributable to increases in membership. Per member per month,
or PMPM, premium rates for the 2010 first quarter averaged $1,062, which reflects an
increase of 1.4% as compared to the 2009 first quarter. The PMPM premium increase in the
current quarter is primarily the result of increases related to member risk scores, which
were partially offset by decreases in CMS-calculated base rates. |
|
|
|
PDP: PDP premiums (after risk corridor adjustments) were $129.5 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2010 compared to $92.5 million in the same period of 2009, an increase of
$37.0 million, or 40.0%. The increase in premiums for the 2010 first quarter is primarily
the result of increases in membership. Our average PMPM premiums (after risk corridor
adjustments) were $111 in the 2010 first quarter, as compared to $109 during the 2009 first
quarter. |
Medical Expense
Medicare Advantage. Medicare Advantage (including MA-PD) medical expense for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 increased $44.3 million, or 10.1%, to $484.6 million from $440.3 million for
the comparable period of 2009, which is primarily attributable to membership increases in the 2010
period as compared to the 2009 period. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Medicare
Advantage medical loss ratio, or MLR, was 78.3% versus 81.3% for the same period of 2009. The
MLR improvement in the 2010 first quarter is primarily attributable to changes in benefit design
and lower inpatient utilization and outpatient procedure costs, combined with premium revenue
increases. Prior period favorable claims development for the three months ended March 31, 2010
increased $3.3 million to $11.4 million from $8.1 million for the comparable period of 2009. The
improvement in MA MLR in the 2010 first quarter as compared to the 2009 first quarter was also
supplemented by MLR improvement in the drug benefit component of our MA-PD plans in the current
period.
Our Medicare Advantage medical expense calculated on a PMPM basis was $831 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, compared with $852 for the comparable 2009 quarter.
PDP. PDP medical expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 increased $39.0 million to
$127.6 million, compared to $88.6 million in the same period last year. PDP MLR for the 2010 first
quarter was 98.6%, compared to 95.8% in the 2009 first quarter. The increase in PDP MLR for the
current quarter was primarily attributable to higher costs in new PDP regions and increased
transition prescription drug costs in the 2010 first quarter compared to the same period in the
prior year.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expense
Selling, general, and administrative expense, or SG&A, for the three months ended March 31,
2010 was $76.5 million as compared with $72.3 million for the same prior year period, an increase
of $4.2 million, or 5.9%. The increase in the 2010 first quarter as compared to the prior year
period is the result of additional personnel costs, increases in sales commissions attributable to
membership growth, and increases in advertising costs. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A
expense decreased approximately 110 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared
to the prior year period.
17
Consistent with historical trends, the company expects the majority of its sales and marketing
expenses to be incurred in the first and fourth quarters of each year in connection with the annual
Medicare enrollment cycle.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $10.0 million in the 2010 first quarter, compared with $4.3 million in
the 2009 first quarter. The Companys interest expense in the 2010 first quarter includes debt
extinguishment costs of $7.1 million resulting from the Companys entering into a new credit
facility and terminating its prior credit facility. Net of extinguishment costs, interest expense
decreased $1.4 million in the 2010 first quarter reflecting lower average debt amounts outstanding
and lower interest rates compared to the 2009 first quarter. The weighted average interest rate
incurred on our borrowings during the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were 5.5%
and 6.4%, respectively (3.9% and 5.2%, respectively, exclusive of amortization of deferred
financing costs and credit facility fees).
Income Tax Expense
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, income tax expense was $19.8 million, reflecting an
effective tax rate of 37.0%, versus $11.8 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of 36.5%, for
the same period of 2009. The higher rate in the 2010 first quarter is the result of a greater
concentration of the companys profitability in its subsidiaries, which are taxed at higher state
tax rates and the reversal of tax benefits on cancelled stock compensation awards.
Segment Information
We report our business in three segments: Medicare Advantage, stand-alone PDP, and Corporate.
Medicare Advantage (MA-PD) consists of Medicare-eligible beneficiaries receiving healthcare
benefits, including prescription drugs, through a coordinated care plan qualifying under Part C and
Part D of the Medicare Program. Stand-alone PDP consists of Medicare-eligible beneficiaries
receiving prescription drug benefits on a stand-alone basis in accordance with Medicare Part D. The
Corporate segment consists primarily of corporate expenses not allocated to the other reportable
segments. These segment groupings are also consistent with information used by our chief executive
officer in making operating decisions.
The results of each segment are measured and evaluated by earnings before interest expense,
depreciation and amortization expense, and income taxes (EBITDA). We do not allocate certain
corporate overhead amounts (classified as SG&A expense) or interest expense to our segments. We
evaluate interest expense, income taxes, and asset and liability details on a consolidated basis as
these items are managed in a corporate shared service environment and are not the responsibility of
segment operating management.
Revenue includes premium revenue, management and other fee income, and investment income.
Financial data by reportable segment for the three months ended March 31 is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MA-PD |
|
|
PDP |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
630,950 |
|
|
$ |
129,476 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
760,442 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
82,451 |
|
|
|
(4,763 |
) |
|
|
(6,295 |
) |
|
|
71,393 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
6,192 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
7,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
553,485 |
|
|
$ |
92,618 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
646,115 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
51,978 |
|
|
|
(1,046 |
) |
|
|
(6,667 |
) |
|
|
44,265 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
6,356 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
7,524 |
|
As of January 1, 2010, the company revised its methodology for allocating selling, general,
and administrative expenses within its prescription drug operations to its MA-PD and PDP segments,
which resulted in allocating a greater share of such expenses to its PDP
segments. As a result of these revisions, the segment EBITDA amounts for the 2009 period
includes reclassification adjustments between segments such that the periods presented are
comparable.
18
A reconciliation of reportable segment EBITDA to net income included in the consolidated
statements of income for the three months ended March 31 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
71,393 |
|
|
$ |
44,265 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(19,834 |
) |
|
|
(11,848 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,971 |
) |
|
|
(4,281 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(7,787 |
) |
|
|
(7,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
33,801 |
|
|
$ |
20,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use segment EBITDA as an analytical indicator for purposes of assessing segment
performance, as is common in the healthcare industry. Segment EBITDA should not be considered as a
measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles and segment EBITDA,
as presented, may not be comparable to other companies.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We finance our operations primarily through internally generated funds. We generate cash
primarily from premium revenue and our primary use of cash is the payment of medical and SG&A
expenses and principal and interest on indebtedness. We anticipate that our current level of cash
on hand, internally generated cash flows, and borrowings available under our revolving credit
facility will be sufficient to fund our working capital needs, our debt service, and anticipated
capital expenditures over at least the next twelve months.
The reported changes in cash and cash equivalents for the three month period ended March 31,
2010, compared to the same period of 2009, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(34,913 |
) |
|
$ |
8,087 |
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(71,992 |
) |
|
|
(12,907 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(38,385 |
) |
|
|
27,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(145,290 |
) |
|
$ |
22,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our primary sources
of liquidity are cash flows provided by our operations and available cash
on hand. To date, we have not had to borrow under our $175.0 million revolving credit facility to
fund operating activities. We used cash in operating activities of $34.9 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2010, compared to generating cash of $8.1 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2009. The negative variance in cash flow from operations for the 2010 first
quarter compared to the 2009 first quarter is primarily the result of the timing of the receipt of
CMS risk payments, a delay in drug rebate collections in the 2010 first quarter related to rebate
billing delays (which billing delays have been corrected) and the amount of medical claims
payments in each period. Cash flows from operations typically lag net income for the first half of
the year as a result of the timing and amount of risk adjustment payment from CMS.
Cash Flows from Investing and Financing Activities
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the primary investing activities consisted of
expenditures of $131.4 million to purchase investment securities and restricted investments, the
receipt of $61.9 million in proceeds from the sale or maturity of investment securities and
restricted investments, and $2.4 million spent on property and equipment additions. The investing
activity in the prior year period consisted primarily of $2.8 million spent on property and
equipment additions, expenditures of $24.8 million
to purchase investment securities and restricted investments, and the receipt of $14.7 million
in proceeds from the maturity of investment securities and restricted investments.
19
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the companys financing activities consisted
primarily of the receipt of $200.0 million in proceeds from the issuance of debt, the expenditure
of $262.0 million for the repayment of existing long-term debt, and $30.4 million of funds received
in excess of funds withdrawn from CMS for the benefit of members. The financing activity in the
prior year period consisted primarily of $36.9 million of funds received in excess of funds
withdrawn from CMS for the benefit of members and $9.5 million for the repayment of long-term debt.
Funds due (held) for the benefit of members from CMS are recorded on our balance sheet at March
31, 2010 and at December 31, 2009. We anticipate settling approximately $2.1 million of such Part
D related amounts (including risk corridor settlements) relating to 2009 with CMS during the second
half of 2010 as part of the final settlement of Part D payments for the 2009 plan year.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
At March 31, 2010, the companys cash and cash equivalents were $294.1 million, $75.6 million
of which was held in unregulated subsidiaries. Approximately $30.6 million of the cash balance
relates to amounts held by the company for the benefit of its Part D members, which we expect to
settle with CMS during the second half of 2011.
Substantially all of the companys liquidity is in the form of cash and cash equivalents
($294.1 million at March 31, 2010), the majority of which ($218.5 million at March 31, 2010) is
held by the companys regulated insurance subsidiaries, which amounts are required by law and by
our credit agreement to be invested in low-risk, short-term, highly-liquid investments (such as
government securities, money market funds, deposit accounts, and overnight repurchase agreements).
The company also invests in securities ($160.2 million at March 31, 2010), primarily corporate and
government debt securities, that it generally intends, and has the ability, to hold to maturity.
Because the company is not relying on these investment securities for near-term liquidity, short
term fluctuations in market pricing generally do not affect the companys ability to meet its
liquidity needs. To date, the company has not experienced any material issuer defaults on its
investment securities.
Statutory Capital Requirements
The companys regulated insurance subsidiaries are required to maintain satisfactory minimum
net worth requirements established by their respective state departments of insurance. At March 31,
2010, the statutory minimum net worth requirements and actual statutory net worth were $18.5
million and $99.0 million for the Tennessee HMO; $1.1 million and $49.1 million for the Alabama
HMO; $10.5 million and $30.2 million for the Florida HMO; $38.4 million (at 200% of authorized
control level) and $71.8 million for the Texas HMO; and $14.6 million (at 200% of authorized
control level) and $27.3 million for the accident and health subsidiary, respectively. Each of
these subsidiaries was in compliance with applicable statutory requirements as of March 31, 2010.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the state departments of insurance can require our regulated
insurance subsidiaries to maintain minimum levels of statutory capital in excess of amounts
required under the applicable state law if they determine that maintaining additional statutory
capital is in the best interest of the companys members. In addition, as a condition to its
approval of the LMC Health Plans acquisition, The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation has
required the Florida plan to maintain 115% of the statutory surplus otherwise required by Florida
law until September 2010.
The regulated insurance subsidiaries are restricted from making distributions without
appropriate regulatory notifications and approvals or to the extent such dividends would put them
out of compliance with statutory net worth requirements. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, our Texas HMO subsidiary distributed $15.0 million in cash to the parent company.
20
Indebtedness
Long-term debt at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Credit agreement |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
236,973 |
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(17,500 |
) |
|
|
(43,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt less current portion |
|
$ |
157,500 |
|
|
$ |
193,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On February 11, 2010, the company entered into a $350.0 million credit agreement (the New
Credit Agreement), which, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, provides for a
five-year, $175.0 million term loan credit facility and a four-year, $175.0 million revolving
credit facility (the New Credit Facilities). Proceeds from the New Credit Facilities, together
with cash on hand, were used to fund the repayment of $237.0 million in term loans outstanding
under the companys 2007 credit agreement as well as transaction expenses related thereto.
Borrowings under the New Credit Agreement accrue interest on the basis of either a base rate
or a LIBOR rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin depending on the companys debt-to-EBITDA
leverage ratio (initially 325 basis points for LIBOR borrowings). The company also pays a
commitment fee of 0.500% per annum, which may be reduced to 0.375% if certain leverage ratios are
achieved, on the actual daily unused portions of the New Credit Facilities. The revolving credit
facility under the New Credit Agreement matures, the commitments thereunder terminate, and all
amounts then outstanding thereunder will be payable on February 11, 2014. As of the date of this
report the revolving credit agreement was undrawn.
In connection with entering into the New Credit Agreement, the company wrote-off unamortized
deferred financing costs of approximately $5.1 million incurred in connection with the 2007 credit
agreement. The company also terminated both interest rate swap agreements, which resulted in a
payment of approximately $2.0 million to the swap counterparties. Such amounts are classified as
interest expense and are reflected in the financial results of the company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At March 31, 2010, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangement requiring disclosure.
Contractual Obligations
We
did not experience any material changes to contractual obligations
outside the ordinary course of business during the three months ended
March 31, 2010.
21
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires our management to make a
number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amount of assets and liabilities and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Our
estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable
under the circumstances. Changes in estimates are recorded if and when better information becomes
available. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results
could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in estimates resulting from continuing
changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future
periods.
We believe that the accounting policies discussed below are those that are most important to
the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and that require our
managements most difficult, subjective, and complex judgments. For a more complete discussion of
these and other critical accounting policies and estimates of the company, see our 2009 Form 10-K.
Medical Expense and Medical Claims Liability
Medical expense is recognized in the period in which services are provided and includes an
estimate of the cost of medical expense that has been incurred but not yet reported, or IBNR.
Medical expense includes claim payments, capitation payments, risk sharing payments and pharmacy
costs, net of rebates, as well as estimates of future payments of claims incurred, net of
reinsurance. Capitation payments represent monthly contractual fees disbursed to physicians and
other providers who are responsible for providing medical care to members. Pharmacy costs represent
payments for members prescription drug benefits, net of rebates from drug manufacturers. Rebates
are recognized when earned, according to the contractual arrangements with the respective vendors.
Premiums we pay to reinsurers are reported as medical expense and related reinsurance recoveries
are reported as deductions from medical expense.
Medical claims liability includes medical claims reported to the plans but not yet paid as
well as an actuarially determined estimate of claims that have been incurred but not yet reported.
The IBNR component of total medical claims liability is based on our historical claims data,
current enrollment, health service utilization statistics, and other related information.
Estimating IBNR is complex and involves a significant amount of judgment. Accordingly, it
represents our most critical accounting estimate. The development of the IBNR includes the use of
standard actuarial developmental methodologies, including completion factors and claims trends,
which take into account the potential for adverse claims developments, and considers favorable and
unfavorable prior period developments. Actual claims payments will differ, however, from our
estimates. A worsening or improvement of our claims trend or changes in completion factors from
those that we assumed in estimating medical claims liabilities at March 31, 2010 would cause these
estimates to change in the near term and such a change could be material.
As discussed above, actual claim payments will differ from our estimates. The period between
incurrence of the expense and payment is, as with most health insurance companies, relatively
short, however, with over 90% of claims typically paid within 60 days of the month in which the
claim is incurred. Although there is a risk of material variances in the amounts of estimated and
actual claims, the variance is known quickly. Accordingly, we expect that substantially all of the
estimated medical claims payable as of the end of any fiscal period (whether a quarter or year end)
will be known and paid during the next fiscal period.
Our policy is to record the best estimate of medical expense IBNR. Using actuarial models, we
calculate a minimum amount and maximum amount of the IBNR component. To most accurately determine
the best estimate, our actuaries determine the point estimate within their minimum and maximum
range by similar medical expense categories within lines of business. The medical expense
categories we use are: in-patient facility, outpatient facility, all professional expense, and
pharmacy. The lines of business are Medicare and commercial.
We apply different estimation methods depending on the month of service for which incurred
claims are being estimated. For the more recent months, which account for the majority of the
amount of IBNR, we estimate our claims incurred by applying the observed trend factors to the
trailing twelve-month PMPM costs. For prior months, costs have been estimated using completion
factors. In order to estimate the PMPMs for the most recent months, we validate our estimates of
the most recent months utilization levels to the utilization levels in older months using
actuarial techniques that incorporate a historical analysis of claim payments, including trends in
cost of care provided, and timeliness of submission and processing of claims.
22
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the completion and claims trend factors and
the impact on our operating results caused by changes in these factors that management believes are
reasonably likely based on our historical experience and March 31, 2010 data (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion Factor (a) |
|
|
Claims Trend Factor (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Increase |
|
|
in Medical |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
in Medical |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Claims |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Claims |
|
in Factor |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
in Factor |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
(4,789 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
$ |
(2,664 |
) |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(3,228 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1,774 |
) |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1,633 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(886 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Impact due to change in completion factor for the most recent three months. Completion
factors indicate how complete claims paid to date are in relation to estimates for a given
reporting period. Accordingly, an increase in completion factor results in a decrease in the
remaining estimated liability for medical claims. |
|
(b) |
|
Impact due to change in annualized medical cost trends used to estimate PMPM costs for the
most recent three months. |
Each month, we re-examine the previously established medical claims liability estimates based
on actual claim submissions and other relevant changes in facts and circumstances. As the liability
estimates recorded in prior periods become more exact, we increase or decrease the amount of the
estimates, and include the changes in medical expenses in the period in which the change is
identified. In every reporting period, our operating results include the effects of more completely
developed medical claims liability estimates associated with prior periods.
In establishing medical claims liability, we also consider premium deficiency situations and
evaluate the necessity for additional related liabilities. There were no required premium
deficiency accruals at March 31, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
Premium Revenue Recognition
We generate revenues primarily from premiums we receive from CMS to provide healthcare
benefits to our members. We receive premium payments on a PMPM basis from CMS to provide healthcare
benefits to our Medicare members, which premiums are fixed (subject to retroactive risk adjustment)
on an annual basis by contracts with CMS. Although the amount we receive from CMS for each member
is fixed, the amount varies among Medicare plans according to, among other things, plan benefits,
demographics, geographic location, age, gender, and the relative risk score of the membership.
We generally receive premiums on a monthly basis in advance of providing services. Premiums
collected in advance are deferred and reported as deferred revenue. We recognize premium revenue
during the period in which we are obligated to provide services to our members. Any amounts that
have not been received are recorded on the balance sheet as accounts receivable.
Our Medicare premium revenue is subject to periodic adjustment under what is referred to as
CMSs risk adjustment payment methodology based on the health risk of our members. Risk adjustment
uses health status indicators to correlate the payments to the health acuity of the member, and
consequently establishes incentives for plans to enroll and treat less healthy Medicare
beneficiaries. Under the risk adjustment payment methodology, coordinated care plans must capture,
collect, and report diagnosis code information to CMS. After reviewing the respective submissions,
CMS establishes the payments to Medicare plans generally at the beginning of the calendar year, and
then adjusts premium levels on two separate occasions on a retroactive basis. The first retroactive
risk premium adjustment for a given fiscal year generally occurs during the third quarter of such
fiscal year. This initial settlement (the Initial CMS Settlement) represents the updating of risk
scores for the current year based on the prior years dates of service. CMS then issues a final
retroactive risk premium adjustment settlement for that fiscal year in the following year (the
Final CMS Settlement). We estimate and record on a monthly basis both the Initial CMS Settlement
and the Final CMS Settlement.
23
We develop our estimates for risk premium adjustment settlement utilizing historical
experience and predictive actuarial models as sufficient member risk score data becomes available
over the course of each CMS plan year. Our actuarial models are populated with available risk score
data on our members. Risk premium adjustments are based on member risk score data from the previous
year. Risk score data for members who entered our plans during the current plan year, however, is
not available for use in our models; therefore, we make assumptions regarding the risk scores of
this subset of our member population.
All such estimated amounts are periodically updated as additional diagnosis code information
is reported to CMS and adjusted to actual amounts when the ultimate adjustment settlements are
either received from CMS or the company receives notification from CMS of such settlement amounts.
As a result of the variability of factors, including plan risk scores, that determine such
estimations, the actual amount of CMSs retroactive risk premium settlement adjustments could be
materially more or less than our estimates. Consequently, our estimate of our plans risk scores
for any period and our accrual of settlement premiums related thereto, may result in favorable or
unfavorable adjustments to our Medicare premium revenue and, accordingly, our profitability. There
can be no assurances that any such differences will not have a material effect on any future
quarterly or annual results of operations.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the Final CMS Settlements and the impact on
premium revenue caused by differences between actual and estimated settlement amounts that
management believes are reasonably likely, based on our historical experience and premium revenue
for the three months ending March 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
In Settlement |
|
in Estimate |
|
|
Receivable |
|
1.5 |
% |
|
$ |
8,764 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
5,843 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2,921 |
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(2,921 |
) |
Goodwill and Indefinite-Life Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of assets of businesses acquired.
Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have
an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment at least
annually. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the
assets fair value. This determination is made at the reporting unit level and consists of two
steps. First, the company determines the fair value of the reporting unit and compares it to its
carrying amount. Second, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an
impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the units goodwill over the
implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating
the fair value of the reporting units in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation. The
residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting units
goodwill. Goodwill currently exists at four of our reporting units Alabama, Florida, Tennessee
and Texas.
Goodwill valuations have been determined using an income approach based on the present value
of future cash flows of each reporting unit. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, we
consider historical results, current operating trends and results, and we make estimates and
assumptions about premiums, medical cost trends, margins and discount rates based on our budgets,
business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and regulatory data. Each of
these factors contains inherent uncertainties and management exercises substantial judgment and
discretion in evaluating and applying these factors.
Although we believe we have sufficient current and historical information available to us to
test for impairment, it is possible that actual cash flows could differ from the estimated cash
flows used in our impairment tests. We could also be required to evaluate the recoverability of
goodwill prior to the annual assessment if we experience various triggering events, including
significant declines in margins or sustained and significant market capitalization declines. These
types of events and the resulting analyses could result in goodwill impairment charges in the
future. Impairment charges, although non-cash in nature, could adversely affect our financial
results in the periods of such charges. In addition, impairment charges may limit our ability to
obtain financing in the future.
24
|
|
|
Item 3: |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had the following assets that may be sensitive
to changes in interest rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Asset Class |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Investment securities, available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,883 |
|
Non-current portion |
|
|
95,310 |
|
|
|
13,574 |
|
Investment securities, held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,965 |
|
Non-current portion |
|
|
45,072 |
|
|
|
38,463 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
19,775 |
|
|
|
16,375 |
|
We have not purchased any of our investments for trading purposes. Investment securities,
which consist primarily of debt securities, have been categorized as either available for sale or
held to maturity. Held to maturity securities are those securities that the Company does not intend
to sell, nor expect to be required to sell, prior to maturity. At March 31, 2010, investment
securities are classified as non-current assets based on the Companys intention to reinvest such
assets upon sale or maturity and to not use such assets in current operations. At December 31,
2009 the Company classified its investment securities based upon maturity dates. These investment
securities consist of highly liquid government and corporate debt obligations, the majority of
which mature in five years or less. The investments are subject to interest rate risk and will
decrease in value if market rates increase. Because of the relatively short-term nature of our
investments and our portfolio mix of variable and fixed rate investments, however, we would not
expect the value of these investments to decline significantly as a result of a sudden change in
market interest rates. Moreover, because of our intention not to sell these investments prior to
their maturity, we would not expect foreseeable changes in interest rates to materially impair
their carrying value. Restricted investments consist of deposits, certificates of deposit,
government securities, and mortgage backed securities, deposited or pledged to state departments of
insurance in accordance with state rules and regulations. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
these restricted assets are recorded at amortized cost and classified as long-term regardless of
the contractual maturity date because of the restrictive nature of the states requirements.
Assuming a hypothetical and immediate 1% increase in market interest rates at March 31, 2010,
the fair value of our fixed income investments would decrease by approximately $1.5 million.
Similarly, a 1% decrease in market interest rates at March 31, 2010 would result in an increase of
the fair value of our investments of approximately $1.5 million. Unless we determined, however,
that the increase in interest rates caused more than a temporary impairment in our investments, or
unless we were compelled by a currently unforeseen reason to sell securities, such a change should
not affect our future earnings or cash flows.
We are subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates based on our
financing, investing, and cash management activities. At March 31, 2010, we had $175.0 million of
outstanding indebtedness, bearing interest at variable rates at specified margins above either the
agent banks alternate base rate or its LIBOR rate, at our election. Holding other variables
constant, including levels of indebtedness, a 0.125% increase in interest rates would have an
estimated impact on pre-tax earnings and cash flows for the next twelve month period of $218,750.
Although changes in the alternate base rate or the LIBOR rate would affect the costs of funds
borrowed in the future, we believe the effect, if any, of reasonably possible near-term changes in
interest rates on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow would not
be material.
At December 31, 2009, we had interest rate swap agreements to manage a portion of our exposure
to these fluctuations. The interest rate swaps converted a portion of our indebtedness to a fixed
rate with a notional amount of $100.0 million at December 31, 2009 and at an annual fixed rate of
2.96%. The company designated its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges which were recorded in
the companys consolidated balance sheet at their fair value. The fair value of the companys
interest rate swaps at December 31, 2009 are reflected as a liability of approximately $2.1 million
and are included in other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In
connection with the New Credit Agreement, the interest rate swap agreements were terminated and
approximately $2.0 million was paid by us to the swap counterparties to settle the terminations. As
of March 31, 2010, we have not taken any other action to cover interest rate risk and are not a
party to any interest rate market risk management activities. We may re-enter into interest rate
swap agreements in the future depending on market conditions and other factors.
25
|
|
|
Item 4: |
|
Controls and Procedures. |
Our senior management carried out the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange
Act, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and
Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act (Disclosure Controls). Based on
the evaluation, our senior management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded that, as of March 31,
2010, our Disclosure Controls were effective.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and
internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of
the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with the company
have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error and mistake.
Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of
two or more people, or by management override of controls.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
26
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings. |
We are not currently involved in any pending legal proceeding that we believe is material to
our financial condition or results of operations. We are, however, involved from time to time in
routine legal matters and other claims incidental to our business, including employment-related
claims, claims relating to our health plans contractual relationships with providers, members and
vendors, and claims relating to marketing practices of sales agents and agencies that are employed
by, or independent contractors to, our health plans.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should consider carefully
the risks and uncertainties previously reported and described under the captions Part I Item
1A. Risk Factors in the 2009 Form 10-K, the occurrence of any of which could materially and
adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results. The risks
previously reported and described in our 2009 Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our business.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently consider to be
immaterial also could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition,
and operating results.
The following risk factors update our 2009 Form 10-K to reflect new or additional risks and
uncertainties:
Recent Health Insurance Reform Legislation May Adversely Affect Our Growth Prospects and Our
Results of Operations.
Recent health insurance reform, as embodied in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,
as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (collectively, PPACA) signed by
the President into law in March 2010, is projected to result in a reduction in federal spending on
the Medicare Advantage program estimated by the Congressional Budget Office to equal $134.9 billion
and estimated by CMS to equal $145 billion over the next 10 years. Medicare premiums, including premiums paid to our PDP, account for
substantially all of our revenue. As a consequence, our profitability is dependent on government
funding levels for Medicare programs.
|
|
Among the more significant risks and uncertainties posed to our business by PPACA are the
following: |
|
|
Reduced Medicare Premium Rates. The reduced payments to Medicare Advantage plans, including
ours, begin with the 2011 contract year. As confirmed by CMS in its 2011 final rate
announcement in April 2010, Medicare Advantage basic capitation rates for 2011 will remain at
2010 levels (in contrast to CMSs preliminary announcement of a 1.38% increase in basic
capitation rates). Coupled with a 3.41% negative coding-intensity adjustment, and other
adjustments, the net effect will be a slight decline in 2011 Medicare Advantage premium rates
(before taking into account any positive effect from increased
risk-based rate adjustments),
notwithstanding the CMS-acknowledged anticipated rise in medical cost trends. Moreover, PPACA
makes the coding intensity adjustment permanent, resulting in mandated minimum reductions in
risk scores of 4.71% in 2014 increasing to 5.7% for 2019 and beyond. |
|
|
Beginning in 2012, PPACA mandates that Medicare Advantage benchmark rates transition to
Medicare fee-for-service parity (generally targeted as CMSs calculated average capitation cost
for Medicare Part A and Part B benefits in each county). PPACA divides counties in quartiles
based on such counties costs for fee-for-service Medicare. For counties in the highest cost
quartile, the Medicare Advantage benchmark rate will equal 95% of the calculated Medicare
fee-for-service costs. The Company estimates that approximately 82.0% of its current
membership resides in the highest cost quartile counties and, accordingly, the premiums for
such members will be transitioned under PPACA to 95% of Medicare fee-for-service costs
beginning in 2012 over a period of two to six years. |
|
|
In responding to the rate reductions, the companys various Medicare plans may have to reduce
benefits, charge or increase member premiums, reduce profit margin expectations, or implement a
combination of the foregoing, any of which measures could adversely
impact our membership growth and revenue expectations. |
|
|
Reduced Enrollment Period. Medicare beneficiaries generally have a limited annual enrollment
period during which they can choose to participate in a Medicare Advantage plan rather than
receive benefits under the traditional fee-for-service Medicare program. After the annual
enrollment period, most Medicare beneficiaries are not permitted to change their Medicare
benefits. |
27
|
|
Beginning in 2011, PPACA changes the annual enrollment period, which will begin on
October 15 and end on December 7 (as contrasted to current law which permits open enrollment
from November 15 to December 31). Also beginning in 2011, PPACA mandates that persons enrolled in
Medicare Advantage may disenroll at any time only during the first 45 days of the year (as
contrasted to current laws first 90 days), and only to enroll in traditional Medicare
fee-for-service, not another Medicare Advantage plan. Prior law allowed a member to disenroll
during this period and to enroll in another Medicare Advantage plan, which has been a
traditional source of growth for our plans membership. There can be no assurance that these
changes will not restrict our member growth, limit our ability to enter new service areas,
limit the viability of our internal sales force, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to
market to or enroll new members in our established service areas. |
|
|
Minimum MLRs. Beginning in 2014, PPACA prescribes a
minimum medical loss ratio, or MLR, of 85% for the
amount of premium revenue to be expended on medical costs. Financial and other penalties may
result from failing to achieve the minimum MLR ratio, including
requirements to refund shortfalls in medical costs to CMS and
termination of a plans Medicare
Advantage contract for prolonged failure. For the year ended December 31, 2009, our reported
MLR was 81.0%. The
methodology for defining medical costs and for calculating MLRs remains to be determined (by,
we assume, CMS rule-making). We believe it is likely that
implementing regulations under PPACA will permit certain items we currently account for as
general and administrative expense, such as expenditures on disease management and health
quality initiatives, to be appropriately classified as medical expense for purposes of the
minimum ratio. There can be no assurance, however, that CMS will
interpret the MLR requirement in this manner. Complying with such minimum ratio by increasing
our medical expenditures or refunding any shortfalls to the federal
government could have an
adverse affect on our operating margins and results of operations. |
|
|
CMS Star Ratings. CMS currently rates Medicare Advantage and PDP plans on certain quality
metrics using a five-star rating system. Beginning in 2012, Medicare Advantage plans with a
rating of four or five stars will be eligible for a quality bonus in their basic capitation
premium rates (1.5% in 2012, phasing to 5% in 2014 and beyond). Moreover, a plans star
ratings will, also beginning in 2012, affect the rebate percentage (currently 75% of the
difference between a plans bid and the relevant benchmark) available for a plan to provide
additional member benefits. Plans with quality ratings of 3.5 stars or below will have their rebate
percentage reduced to 50% by 2014. The Companys plans currently average star ratings of 3.3,
with only our Florida and Tennessee plans rated at 3.5 stars or above and no plan rated at 4.0
stars or above. Notwithstanding concerted efforts by the Company to improve its star-ratings
and other quality measures prior to PPACAs applicability in 2012, there can be no assurances
that the company will be successful in doing so. Accordingly, company plans may not be
eligible for quality bonuses or increased rebates, which could adversely affect the benefits
such plans can offer, reduce membership, and reduce profit margins. |
|
|
Federal Premium Tax. Beginning in 2014, PPACA imposes
an annual aggregate non-deductible tax of $8.0 billion
(increasing incrementally to $14.3 billion by 2018) on health insurance premiums, including
Medicare Advantage premiums. Our Companys share of the new tax each year will be based on our
pro rata percentage of premiums compared to the industry as a whole. Although
there is time to take into account this new tax in adjusting our
business model and in designing
future years plan bids, there can be no assurance that such tax will not result in reduced
benefits, reduced profits, or both. |
Our Records and Submissions to CMS May Contain Inaccurate or Unsupportable Information Regarding
the Risk Adjustment Scores of Our Members, Which Could Cause Us to Overstate or Understate Our
Revenue.
We maintain claims and encounter data that support the risk adjustment scores of our members,
which determine, in part, the revenue to which we are entitled for these members. This data is
submitted to CMS by us based on medical charts and diagnosis codes prepared and submitted to us by
providers of medical care. We generally rely on providers to appropriately document and support
such risk-adjustment data in their medical records and appropriately code their claims. We
sometimes experience errors in information and data reporting systems relating to claims,
encounters, and diagnoses. Inaccurate or unsupportable coding by medical providers, inaccurate
records for new members in our plans, and erroneous claims and encounter recording and submissions
could result in inaccurate premium revenue and risk adjustment payments, which are subject to
correction or retroactive adjustment in later periods. Payments that we receive in connection with
this corrected or adjusted information may be reflected in financial statements for periods
subsequent to the period in which the revenue was earned. We, or CMS through a medical records
review and risk adjustment validation, may also find that data regarding our members risk scores,
when reconciled, requires that we refund a portion of the revenue that we received, which refund,
depending on its magnitude, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
28
In connection with CMSs continuing statutory obligation to review risk score coding practices
by Medicare Advantage plans, CMS announced that it would regularly audit Medicare Advantage plans,
primarily targeted based on risk score growth, for compliance by the plans and their providers with
proper coding practices (sometimes referred to as RADV Audits). The Companys Tennessee Medicare
Advantage plan was selected by CMS for a RADV Audit of the 2006 risk adjustment data used to
determine 2007 premium rates. In late 2009, the Companys Tennessee plan received from CMS the RADV
Audit member sample, which CMS will use to calculate a payment error rate for 2007 Tennessee plan
premiums. In February 2010, the Company responded to the RADV Audit request, including retrieving
and providing medical records supporting diagnoses codes and risk scores and, where appropriate,
provider attestations.
CMS has indicated that payment adjustments resulting from its RADV Audits will not be limited
to risk scores for the specific beneficiaries for which errors are found but will be extrapolated
to the relevant plan population. CMSs methodology for extrapolation remains unclear, however. The
Company is currently unable to calculate a payment error rate or predict the impact of
extrapolating that error rate to 2007 Tennessee plan premiums. There can be no assurance, however,
that the conclusion of the Tennessee RADV Audit will not result in an adverse impact to the
Companys results of operations or cash flows (which may or may
not be material), or that the Companys other plans will not be
randomly selected or targeted for a RADV Audit by CMS or, in the event that another plan is so
selected, that the outcome of such RADV Audit will not result in a material adverse impact to the
Companys results of operations and cash flows.
Statutory Authority for SNPs Could Expire and Federal Limitations on SNP Expansion and Other Recent
Limitations on SNP Activities Could Adversely Impact our Growth Plans.
We
currently have approximately 37,000 members in our special needs plans (SNPs),
substantially all of which are enrolled in our dual-eligible SNPs. PPACA extended CMSs authority
to designate SNPs to December 31, 2013. Legislative authority for SNPs for dual-eligible
beneficiaries that do not have a contract with a state Medicaid agency is extended through December
31, 2012, but such dual-eligible SNPs may not extend beyond their existing service areas. Failure
to renew our SNP contracts could adversely impact our operating results.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company repurchased the following shares of its
common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Shares that May Yet |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price Paid per |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Be Purchased Under |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Share ($) |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
the Plans or Programs |
|
01/01/10 01/31/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/01/10 02/28/10 |
|
|
17,690 |
|
|
|
18.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03/01/10 03/31/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
17,690 |
|
|
|
18.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of shares purchased includes 84 shares repurchased from an employee at a price of
$0.20 per share following her termination in accordance with the terms of a restricted stock
purchase agreement and 17,606 shares withheld by the Company to satisfy the payment of tax
obligations related to the vesting of shares of restricted stock.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
Inapplicable.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Other Information. |
Inapplicable.
29
See Exhibit Index following signature page.
30
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEALTHSPRING, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: April 29, 2010
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Karey L. Witty
Karey L. Witty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Officer (Principal Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
31
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2010, by and among
HealthSpring, Inc., as borrower, certain subsidiaries of
HealthSpring, Inc., as guarantors, the lenders party thereto from
time to time, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing
line lender and a letter or credit issuer and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A., as syndication agent (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
HealthSpring, Inc. Executive Officer Cash Bonus Plan* (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan, contract, or arrangement. |
|
(1) |
|
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
February 12, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March
18, 2010. |
32