As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 27, 2010

Registration No. 333-169873

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

 

Amendment No. 1

to

Form S-4

 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

 

 

 

APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100

Denver, Colorado 80237

(303) 757-8101

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

John Bezzant

Senior Vice President

Apartment Investment and Management Company

4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100

Denver, Colorado 80237

(303) 757-8101

 

(Name, address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code of agent for service)

 

 

Copies to:

 

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:  As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement is declared effective and all other conditions to the merger as described in the enclosed information statement/prospectus are satisfied or waived.

 

If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box:  o

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:  o

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this transaction:

 

Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer)         o

 

Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer)  o

 

 

The Registrants hereby amend this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrants will file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement will thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement will become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED October 27, 2010

 

INFORMATION STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS

 

SHELTER PROPERTIES II

 

Shelter Properties II, or SP II, plans to enter into an agreement and plan of merger with a wholly owned subsidiary of Aimco Properties, L.P., or Aimco OP. Under the proposed merger agreement, the Aimco Subsidiary, AIMCO SP II Merger Sub LLC, will be merged with and into SP II, with SP II as the surviving entity. The Aimco Subsidiary was formed for the purpose of effecting this transaction and does not have any assets or operations. In the merger, each Unit of Limited Partnership Interest of SP II, or SP Unit, will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of such SP Unit, either:

 

 

The number of OP Units offered for each SP Unit will be calculated by dividing $350.64 by the average closing price of common stock of Apartment Investment and Management Company, or Aimco, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. For example, as of October 25, 2010, the average closing price of Aimco common stock over the preceding ten consecutive trading days was $22.96, which would have resulted in 15.27 OP Units offered for each SP Unit. However, if AIMCO OP determines that the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction (or that registration or qualification in that state or jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), then such limited partner will not be entitled to elect OP Units, and will receive cash.

 

In the merger, Aimco OP’s interest in the Aimco Subsidiary will be converted into SP Units. As a result, after the merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of SP II and will own all of the outstanding SP Units.

 

Within ten days after the effective time of the merger, Aimco OP will prepare and mail to you an election form pursuant to which you can elect to receive cash or OP Units. You may elect your form of consideration by completing and returning the election form in accordance with its instructions. If the information agent does not receive a properly completed election form from you before 5:00 p.m., New York time, on the 30th day after the merger, you will be deemed to have elected to receive cash. You may also use the election form to elect to receive, in lieu of the merger consideration, the appraised valued of your SP Units, determined through an arbitration proceeding.

 

In addition and separate from the merger consideration, you may elect to receive an additional cash payment of $17.76 in exchange for executing a waiver and release of certain claims. In order to receive such additional payment, you must complete the relevant section of the election form, execute the waiver and release that is attached to the election form and return both the election form and the executed waiver and release to the information agent as described above.

 

Prior to entering into the proposed merger agreement, the certificate and agreement of limited partnership of SP II will be amended to provide that a majority in interest of the SP Units may approve business combination transactions involving SP II, including the merger contemplated by the proposed merger agreement.

 

Under South Carolina law, the amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership must be approved by SP II’s general partners and by holders of a majority of the outstanding SP Units. Once amended, SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership will provide that the merger may be approved by SP II’s general partners and by a majority of the outstanding SP Units. SP II’s general partners have determined that the amendment and the proposed merger are advisable and in the best interests of SP II and its limited partners and have approved the amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership, the proposed merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. As of October 25, 2010, there were issued and outstanding 27,500 SP Units, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned 21,868.5 of those units, or approximately 79.52% of the number of units outstanding. Aimco OP and its affiliates have indicated that they intend to take action by written consent, as permitted under the partnership agreement, to approve the amendment, the proposed merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby on or about          , 2010. As a result, approval of the transactions is assured, and your consent is not required.

 

WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND
YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A PROXY

 

This information statement/prospectus contains information about the proposed amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership, the proposed merger agreement, the transactions contemplated thereby, and the securities offered hereby, and the reasons that SP II’s corporate general partner, Shelter Realty II Corporation, or the Corporate General Partner, has decided that the transactions are in the best interests of SP II and its limited partners. The Corporate General Partner has conflicts of interest with respect to the transactions that are described in greater detail herein. Please read this information statement/prospectus carefully, including the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 14. It provides you with detailed information about the proposed amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership, the proposed merger agreement, the transactions contemplated thereby, and the securities offered hereby. The proposed merger agreement is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex A. The proposed amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex F.

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the securities to be issued in connection with the merger or determined if this information statement/prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

This information statement/prospectus is dated, 2010, and is first being mailed to limited partners on or about          , 2010.

 

WE ARE CURRENTLY SEEKING QUALIFICATION TO ALLOW ALL HOLDERS OF SP UNITS THE ABILITY TO ELECT TO RECEIVE OP UNITS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGER. HOWEVER, AT THE PRESENT TIME, IF YOU ARE A RESIDENT OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STATES, YOU ARE NOT PERMITTED TO ELECT TO RECEIVE OP UNITS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGER:

 

CALIFORNIA

MASSACHUSETTS

NEW YORK

 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK HAS NOT PASSED ON OR ENDORSED THE MERITS OF THIS OFFERING. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

This information statement/prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about Aimco and Aimco OP from documents that they have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission but that have not been included in or delivered with this information statement/prospectus. For a listing of documents incorporated by reference into this information statement/prospectus, please see “Where You Can Find Additional Information” beginning on page 90 of this information statement/prospectus.

 

Aimco will provide you with copies of such documents relating to Aimco and Aimco OP (excluding all exhibits unless Aimco or Aimco OP has specifically incorporated by reference an exhibit in this information statement/prospectus), without charge, upon written or oral request to:

 

ISTC Corporation
P.O. Box 2347
Greenville, South Carolina 29602
(864) 239-1029

 

If you have any questions or require any assistance, please contact our information agent, Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, by mail at 12 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016; by fax at (908) 497-2349; or by telephone at (800) 217-9608.

 

ABOUT THIS INFORMATION STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS

 

This information statement/prospectus, which forms a part of a registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Aimco and Aimco OP, constitutes a prospectus of Aimco OP under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, with respect to the OP Units that may be issued to holders of SP Units in connection with the merger, and a prospectus of Aimco under Section 5 of the Securities Act with respect to shares of Aimco common stock that may be issued in exchange for such OP Units tendered for redemption by the holder thereof. This document also constitutes an information statement under Section 14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, with respect to the action to be taken by written consent to approve the amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership, the proposed merger agreement, the transactions contemplated thereby.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

	•	The Transactions:

	•	Amendment of SP II’s Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership.  Prior to entering into the proposed merger agreement, SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership will be amended to provide that a majority in interest of the SP Units may approve business combination transactions involving SP II, including the merger contemplated by the proposed merger agreement. See “The Transactions — Amendment of Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership” beginning on page 33. A copy of the proposed amendment to SP II’s partnership agreement is attached as Annex F to this information statement/prospectus.

	•	The Merger.  Following the amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership, SP II plans to enter into a merger agreement with the Aimco Subsidiary and Aimco OP. Under the proposed merger agreement, at the effective time of the merger, the Aimco Subsidiary will be merged with and into SP II, with SP II as the surviving entity. A copy of the proposed merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this information statement/prospectus. You are encouraged to read the proposed merger agreement carefully in its entirety because it is the legal agreement that governs the mergers.

	•	Merger Consideration:  In the proposed merger, each SP Unit outstanding immediately prior to consummation of the merger will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of such SP Unit, either $350.64 in cash or equivalent value in OP Units, except in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units (or registration would be prohibitively costly). The number of OP Units issuable with respect to each SP Unit will be calculated by dividing the $350.64 per unit cash merger consideration by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. For a full description of the determination of the merger consideration, see “The Transactions — Determination of Merger Consideration” beginning on page 33.

	•	Effects of the Transactions:  After the amendment of SP II’s partnership agreement and the merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner in SP II, and will own all of the outstanding SP Units. As a result, after the transactions, you will cease to have any rights in SP II as a limited partner. See “Special Factors — Effects of the Transactions,” beginning on page 5.

	•	Appraisal Rights:  Pursuant to the terms of the proposed merger agreement, Aimco OP will provide each limited partner with contractual dissenters’ appraisal rights that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights available to a stockholder of a corporation in a merger under Delaware law, and which will enable a limited partner to obtain an appraisal of the value of the limited partner’s SP Units in connection with the transactions. See “The Transactions — Appraisal Rights,” beginning on page 36. A description of the appraisal rights being provided, and the procedures that a limited partner must follow to seek such rights, is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex B.

	•	Additional Payment for Waiver and Release:  In addition to the merger consideration, each limited partner unaffiliated with Aimco OP or its affiliates may elect to receive an additional cash payment of $17.76 per SP Unit in exchange for executing a waiver and release of potential claims such unaffiliated limited partner may have had in the past, may now have or may have in the future (through and including the date of the consummation of the merger) against SP II, the Corporate General Partner, Aimco OP or its affiliates and certain other persons and entities, including but not limited to claims related to the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, but excluding claims limited partners may have under federal securities laws. See “The Transactions — Waiver and Release and Additional Consideration,” beginning on page 34.

	•	Parties Involved:

	•	Shelter Properties II, or SP II, was organized as a limited partnership under the laws of the State of South Carolina on October 10, 1980. SP II is engaged in the business of operating and holding real estate property for investment. SP II presently owns and operates two investment properties: Parktown Townhouses, a 309 unit apartment project located in Deer Park, Texas, and Signal Pointe Apartments, a 368 unit apartment project located in Winter Park, Florida. See “Information About Shelter Properties II,” beginning on page 26. SP II’s principal address is 55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089, Greenville, South Carolina 29602, and its telephone number is (864) 239-1000.

	•	Apartment Investment and Management Company, or Aimco, is a Maryland corporation that is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, focused on the ownership and management of quality apartment communities located in the 20 largest markets in the United States. Aimco is one of the largest owners and operators of apartment properties in the United States. Aimco’s common stock is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “AIV.” See “Information about the Aimco Entities,” beginning on page 25.

	•	AIMCO Properties, L.P., or Aimco OP, is a Delaware limited partnership which, through its operating divisions and subsidiaries, holds substantially all of Aimco’s assets and manages the daily operations of Aimco’s business and assets. See “Information about the Aimco Entities,” beginning on page 25.

	•	AIMCO SP II Merger Sub LLC, or the Aimco Subsidiary, is a Delaware limited liability company formed on September 29, 2010, for the purpose of consummating the merger with SP II. See “Information about the Aimco entities,” beginning on page 25.

	•	Reasons for the Transactions:  Aimco and Aimco OP are in the business of acquiring, owning and managing apartment properties such as those owned by SP II, and have decided to proceed with the merger as a means of acquiring the properties currently owned by SP II in a manner that they believe (i) provides fair value to limited partners, (ii) offers limited partners an opportunity to receive immediate liquidity, or defer recognition of taxable gain (except where the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction, or where registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly), and (iii) relieves SP II of the expenses associated with a sale of the properties, including marketing and other transaction costs. The Aimco Entities decided to proceed with the merger at this time for the following reasons:

	•	In the absence of a transaction, SP II limited partners have only limited options to liquidate their investment in SP II. The SP Units are not traded on an exchange or other reporting system, and transactions in the securities are limited and sporadic.

	•	The value of the two properties owned by SP II is not sufficient to justify its continued operation as a public company. As a public company with a significant number of unaffiliated limited partners, SP II incurs costs associated with preparing audited annual financial statements, unaudited quarterly financial statements, tax returns for partners on schedule K-1, periodic SEC reports and other expenses. The Aimco Entities estimate these costs to be approximately $60,000 per year.

	•	SP II has been operating at a loss for the past couple of years. During 2008 and 2009, Aimco OP made loans of approximately $17,267,000 to SP II to help fund redevelopment of Signal Pointe Apartments as well as operating expenses at both of SPII’s properties. The Aimco Entities do not believe that SP II can obtain financing from an independent third party. If the Aimco Entities acquire 100% ownership of SP II, they will have greater flexibility in financing and operating its properties.

	•	Fairness of the Transactions:  Although the Aimco Entities have interests that may conflict with those of SP II’s unaffiliated limited partners, each of the Aimco Entities believe that the merger is fair to the unaffiliated limited partners of NPI. See “Special Factors — Fairness of the Transactions” beginning on page 6.

	•	Conflicts of Interest:  The Corporate General Partner is indirectly wholly owned by Aimco. Therefore, the Corporate General Partner has a conflict of interest with respect to the transactions. The Corporate General

		Partner has fiduciary duties to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., the Corporate General Partner’s sole stockholder and an affiliate of Aimco, on the one hand, and to SP II and its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of the Corporate General Partner to SP II and its limited partners conflict with the duties of the Corporate General Partner to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., which could result in the Corporate General Partner approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict of interest. See, “The Transactions — Conflicts of Interest,” beginning on page 34.

	•	Risk Factors:  In evaluating the proposed amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership, the proposed merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, SP II limited partners should carefully read this information statement/prospectus and especially consider the factors discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 14. Some of the risk factors associated with the merger are summarized below:

	•	Aimco owns the Corporate General Partner. As a result, the Corporate General Partner has a conflict of interest in the transactions. A transaction with a third party in the absence of this conflict could result in better terms or greater consideration to SP II limited partners.

	•	SP II limited partners who receive cash may recognize taxable gain in the transactions and that gain could exceed the merger consideration.

	•	There are a number of significant differences between SP Units and Aimco OP Units relating to, among other things, the nature of the investment, voting rights, distributions and liquidity and transferability/redemption. For more information regarding those differences, see “Comparison of SP Units and Aimco OP Units,” beginning on page 56.

	•	Limited partners may elect to receive OP Units as merger consideration, and there are risks related to an investment in OP Units, including the fact that there are restrictions on transferability of OP Units and there is no assurance as to the value that might be realized upon a future redemption of OP Units.

	•	Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Transactions:  The merger will generally be treated as a partnership merger for Federal income tax purposes. In general, any payment of cash for SP Units will be treated as a sale of such SP Units by such holder, and any exchange of SP Units for OP Units under the terms of the merger agreement will be treated, in accordance with Sections 721 and 731 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, as a tax free transaction, except to the extent described in “Material United States Federal Income Tax Matters — Taxation of Aimco OP and OP Unitholders — United States Federal Income Tax Consequences Relating to the Merger,” beginning on page 62.

 

Aimco and Aimco OP are in the business of acquiring, owning and managing apartment properties such as those owned by SP II, and have decided to proceed with the merger as a means of acquiring the properties currently owned by SP II in a manner that they believe (i) provides fair value to limited partners, (ii) offers limited partners an opportunity to receive immediate liquidity, or defer recognition of taxable gain (except where the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction, or where registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly), and (iii) relieves SP II of the expenses associated with a sale of the properties, including marketing and other transaction costs.

 

The Aimco Entities decided to proceed with the merger at this time for the following reasons:

 

 

 

 

Before deciding to proceed with the merger, the Corporate General Partner and the other Aimco Entities considered the alternatives described below:

 

Continuation of SP II as a Public Company Operating the Properties.  As discussed above, the Corporate General Partner and the other Aimco Entities did not consider this a viable alternative primarily because of the costs associated with preparing financial statements, tax returns, periodic SEC reports and other expenses, and the inability of SP II to generate sufficient funds to cover operating expenses without advances from Aimco OP which would not be available in the future.

 

Liquidation of SPII.  The Corporate General Partner and the other Aimco Entities considered a liquidation of SP II in which SP II’s properties would be marketed and sold to a third party or third parties for cash, with any net proceeds remaining, after payment of all liabilities, distributed to SP II’s limited partners. The primary advantage of such a transaction would be that the sale price would reflect arm’s-length negotiations and might therefore be higher than the appraised value which has been used to determine the merger consideration. The Corporate General Partner and the other Aimco Entities rejected this alternative because of: (i) the risk that a third party might not be found at a satisfactory price or at all; (ii) the costs that SP II would incur in connection with marketing and selling the properties; and (iii) the fact that limited partners would recognize taxable gain on the sales; and (iv) the prepayment penalties that SPII would incur in repaying its mortgage debt upon a sale of the properties.

 

Contribution of the properties to Aimco OP.  The Aimco Entities considered a transaction in which SP II’s properties would be contributed to Aimco OP in exchange for OP Units. The primary advantage of such a transaction would be that SP II limited partners would not recognize taxable gain. The Aimco Entities rejected this alternative because it would not offer an opportunity for immediate liquidity to those limited partners who desire it.

 

The Aimco Entities believe that the merger will have the following benefits and detriments to unaffiliated limited partners, SP II and the Aimco Entities:

 

Benefits to Unaffiliated Limited Partners.  The merger is expected to have the following principal benefits to unaffiliated limited partners:

 

Option to Defer Taxable Gain.  Limited partners are given a choice of merger consideration, and may elect to receive either cash or OP Units in the merger, except in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units (or registration would be prohibitively costly). Limited partners who receive OP Units in the merger may defer recognition of taxable gain.

 

Liquidity.  Limited partners who receive the cash consideration will receive immediate liquidity with respect to their investment.

 

Diversification.  Limited partners who receive OP Units in the merger will have the opportunity to participate in Aimco OP, which has a more diversified property portfolio than SP II.

 

Benefits to SP II.  The merger is expected to have the following principal benefits to SP II:

 

Elimination of Costs Associated with SEC Reporting Requirements and Multiple Limited Partners.  After the merger, the Aimco Entities will own all of the interests in SP II, and SP II will terminate its registration and cease filing periodic reports with the SEC. As a result, SP II will no longer incur costs associated with preparing audited annual financial statements, unaudited quarterly financials statements, tax returns for partners on schedule K-1, periodic SEC reports and other expenses. The Aimco Entities estimate these expenses to be approximately $60,000 per year.

 

Benefits to the Aimco Entities.  The merger is expected to have the following principal benefits to the Aimco Entities:

 

Increased Interest in SP II.  Upon completion of the merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of SP II. As a result, the Aimco Entities will receive all of the benefit from any future appreciation in value of the properties after the merger, and any future property income.

 

Detriments to Unaffiliated Limited Partners.  The merger is expected to have the following principal detriments to unaffiliated limited partners:

 

Taxable Gain.  Limited partners who receive cash consideration may recognize taxable gain in the merger and that gain could exceed the merger consideration. Limited partners who receive OP Units in the merger could recognize taxable gain if Aimco subsequently sells the properties.

 

Risks Related to OP Units.  Limited partners who receive OP Units in the merger will be subject to the risks related to an investment in OP Units, as described in greater detail under the heading “Risk Factors — Risks Related to an Investment in OP Units.”

 

Conflicts of Interest; No Separate Representation of Unaffiliated Limited Partners.  The Corporate General Partner is indirectly wholly owned by Aimco. Therefore, the Corporate General Partner has a conflict of interest with respect to the merger. The Corporate General Partner has fiduciary duties to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., the Corporate General Partner’s sole stockholder and an affiliate of Aimco, on the one hand, and to USRP and its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of the Corporate General Partner to USRP and its limited partners conflict with the duties of the Corporate General Partner to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., which could result in the Corporate General Partner approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict of interest. In negotiating the merger agreement, no one separately represented the interests of the unaffiliated limited partners. If an independent advisor had been engaged, it is possible that such advisor could have negotiated better terms for SP II’s unaffiliated limited partners.

 

Detriments to SP II.  The merger is not expected to have any detriments to SP II.

 

Detriments to the Aimco Entities.  The merger is expected to have the following principal detriments to the Aimco Entities:

 

Increased Interest in SP II.  Upon completion of the merger, the Aimco Entities’ interest in the net book value of SP II will increase from 79.7% to 100%, or from a deficit of $12,069,000 to a deficit of $15,151,000 as of December 31, 2009, and their interest in the net losses of SP II will increase from 79.7% to 100%, or from $1,716,000 to $2,152,000 for the period ended December 31, 2009. Upon completion of the merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of SP II. As a result, Aimco OP will bear the burden of all future operating or other losses, as well as any decline in the value of SP II’s properties.

 

Burden of Capital Expenditures.  Upon completion of the merger, the Aimco Entities will have sole responsibility for providing any funds necessary to pay for capital expenditures at the properties.

 

For a discussion of the material United States federal income tax consequences of the merger, see “Material United States Federal Income Tax Matters — United States Federal Income Tax Consequences Relating to the Merger.”

 

Factors in Favor of Fairness Determination.  The Aimco Entities (including the Corporate General Partner) believe that the merger is fair and in the best interests of SP II and its unaffiliated limited partners. In support of such determination, the Aimco Entities considered the following factors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Factors Not in Favor of Fairness Determination.  In addition to the foregoing factors, the Aimco Entities also considered the following countervailing factors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Aimco Entities did not assign relative weights to the above factors in making their conclusion that the merger is fair to SP II and its unaffiliated limited partners. They relied primarily on their estimate of value calculated by adding the value of SP II’s properties, as determined by CRA, an independent valuation firm, and the value of all of SP II’s other assets, and deducting the amount of its mortgage debt (without deducting any prepayment penalties associated with that debt) and all other liabilities.

 

The Aimco Entities were aware of, but did not place much emphasis on, information regarding prices at which SP Units may have sold in the secondary markets because they do not view that information as a reliable measure of value. The SP Units are not traded on an exchange or other reporting system, and transactions in the securities are very limited and sporadic. In addition, some of the historical prices are not comparable to current value because of

intervening events, including a property sale, distribution of proceeds and advances from the Corporate General Partner.

 

Procedural Fairness.  The Aimco Entities determined that the merger is fair from a procedural standpoint despite the absence of any customary procedural safeguards, such as the engagement of an unaffiliated representative, the approval of independent directors or approval by a majority of unaffiliated limited partners. In making this determination, the Aimco Entities relied primarily on the dissenters’ appraisal rights provided to unaffiliated limited partners under the merger agreement that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights available to stockholders in a corporate merger under Delaware law.

 

Selection and Qualifications of Independent Appraiser.  The Corporate General Partner retained the services of CRA to appraise the market value of SP II’s properties. CRA is an experienced independent valuation consulting firm that has performed appraisal services for Aimco OP and its affiliates in the past. Aimco OP believes that its relationship with CRA had no negative impact on its independence in conducting the appraisals related to the merger.

 

Factors Considered.  CRA performed complete appraisals of Parktown Townhouses and Signal Pointe Apartments. CRA has represented that its reports were prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, as promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation and the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. SP II furnished CRA with all of the necessary information requested by CRA in connection with the appraisals. The appraisals were not prepared in conjunction with a request for a specific value or a value within a given range. In preparing its valuation of each property, CRA, among other things:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary of Approaches and Methodologies Employed.  The following summary describes the approaches and analyses employed by CRA in preparing the appraisals. CRA principally relied on two approaches to valuation: (i) the income capitalization approach and (ii) the sales comparison approach.

 

The income capitalization approach is based on the premise that value is derived by converting anticipated benefits into property value. Anticipated benefits include the present value of the net income and the present value of the net proceeds resulting from the re-sale of the property. CRA reported that each property has an adequate operations history to determine its income-producing capabilities over the near future. In addition, performance levels of competitive properties served as an adequate check as to the reasonableness of each property’s actual performance. As such, the income capitalization approach was utilized in the appraisal of each property.

 

As part of the income capitalization approach, CRA used the direct capitalization method to estimate a value for Parktown Townhouses and Signal Pointe Apartments. According to CRA’s reports, the basic steps in the direct capitalization analysis are as follows: (i) calculate potential gross income from all sources that a competent owner could legally generate; (ii) estimate and deduct an appropriate vacancy and collection loss factor to arrive at effective gross income; (iii) estimate and deduct operating expenses that would be expected during a stabilized year to arrive at a probable net operating income; (iv) develop an appropriate overall capitalization rate to apply to the net

operating income; and (v) estimate value by dividing the net operating income by the overall capitalization rate. In addition, any adjustments to account for differences between the current conditions and stabilized conditions are also considered. The assumptions utilized by CRA with respect to each property are set forth below. The property-specific assumptions were determined by CRA to be reasonable based on its review of historical operating and financial data for each property and comparison of said data to the operating statistics of similar properties in the influencing market areas. The capitalization rate for each property was determined to be reasonable by CRA based on their review of applicable data ascertained within the market in which each property is located.

 

The sales comparison approach is an estimate of value based upon a process of comparing recent sales of similar properties in the surrounding or competing areas to the subject property. This comparative process involves judgment as to the similarity of the subject property and the comparable sales with respect to many value factors such as location, contract rent levels, quality of construction, reputation and prestige, age and condition, and the interest transferred, among others. The value estimated through this approach represents the probable price at which the subject property would be sold by a willing seller to a willing and knowledgeable buyer as of the date of value. The reliability of this technique is dependent upon the availability of comparable sales data, the verification of the sales data, the degree of comparability and extent of adjustment necessary for differences, and the absence of atypical conditions affecting the individual sales prices. CRA reported that, although the volume of sales activity is down as a result of market conditions, its research revealed adequate sales activity to form a reasonable estimation of each of the subject property’s market value pursuant to the sales comparison approach.

 

In each of the appraisals, numerous sales were uncovered and the specific sales included in the appraisal reports were deemed representative of the most comparable data available at the time the appraisals were prepared. Important criteria utilized in selecting the most comparable data included: conditions under which the sale occurred (i.e. seller and buyer were typically motivated); date of sale — every attempt was made to utilize recent sales transactions; sales were selected based on their physical similarity to the appraised property; transactions were selected based on the similarity of location between the comparable and appraised property; and, similarity of economic characteristics between the comparable and appraised property. Sales data that may have been uncovered during the course of research that was not included in the appraisal did not meet the described criteria and/or could not be adequately confirmed.

 

According to CRA’s reports, the basic steps in processing the sales comparison approach are outlined as follows: (i) research the market for recent sales transactions, listings, and offers to purchase or sell of properties similar to the subject property; (ii) select a relevant unit of comparison and develop a comparative analysis; (iii) compare comparable sale properties with the subject property using the elements of comparison and adjust the price of each comparable to the subject property; and (iv) reconcile the various value indications produced by the analysis of the comparables.

 

The final step in the appraisal process is the reconciliation of the value indicators into a single value estimate. CRA reviewed each approach in order to determine its appropriateness relative to each property. The accuracy of the data available and the quantity of evidence were weighted in each approach. For the appraisals of Parktown Townhouses and Signal Pointe Apartments, CRA relied principally on the income capitalization approach to valuation. For each property, CRA relied secondarily on the sales comparison approach, and reported that the value conclusion derived pursuant to the sales comparison approach is supportive of the conclusion derived pursuant to the income capitalization approach.

 

Parktown Townhouses

 

Summary of Independent Appraisal of Parktown Townhouses.  CRA performed a complete appraisal of Parktown Townhouses. The appraisal report of Parktown Townhouses is dated June 7, 2010 and provides an estimate of the property’s market value as of May 25, 2010. The summary set forth below describes the material conclusions reached by CRA based on the value determined under the valuation approaches and subject to the assumptions and limitations described below. According to CRA’s report, the estimated market value of Parktown

Townhouses was $21,600,000 as of May 25, 2010. The following is a summary of the appraisal report dated June 7, 2010:

 

Valuation Under Income Capitalization Approach.  Using the income capitalization approach, CRA performed a direct capitalization analysis to derive a value for Parktown Townhouses.

 

The direct capitalization analysis resulted in a valuation conclusion for Parktown Townhouses of approximately $21,600,000.

 

The assumptions employed by CRA to determine the value of Parktown Townhouses under the income capitalization approach using a direct capitalization analysis included:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Using a direct capitalization analysis, CRA calculated the value of Parktown Townhouses by dividing the stabilized net operating income (including an allowance for reserves) by the concluded capitalization rate of 8.0%.

 

CRA calculated the market value of the fee simple interest in the Parktown Townhouses under the income capitalization approach of approximately $21,600,000 as of May 25, 2010.

 

Valuation Under Sales Comparison Approach.  CRA estimated the property value of Parktown Townhouses under the sales comparison approach by analyzing sales from the influencing market that were most similar to Parktown Townhouses in terms of age, size, tenant profile and location. CRA reported that, while sales volume for most types of commercial real estate have declined considerably from historical levels, an adequate number of apartments sales existed to formulate a defensible value for Parktown Townhouses under the sales comparison approach. CRA reported that the primary limitation of the sales data was the lack of truly comparable properties that featured a single-story townhouse-style design and large average floor plan size similar to Parktown Townhouses.

 

The sales comparison approach resulted in a valuation conclusion for Parktown Townhouses of approximately $21,600,000.

 

In reaching a valuation conclusion for Parktown Townhouses, CRA examined and analyzed comparable sales of four properties in the influencing market. The sales reflected unadjusted sales prices ranging from $49,462 to $63,333 per unit. After adjustment, the comparable sales illustrated a value range of $66,700 to $76,000 per unit, with mean and median adjusted sale prices of $69,682 and $68,013 per unit, respectively. CRA reported that two of the comparable sales required the least adjustment and were accorded most significance in the analysis, and that the adjusted sales prices for these properties ranged from $66,700 to $76,000 per unit. CRA estimated a value of $70,000 per unit for Parktown Townhouses. Applied to Parktown Townhouses’ 309 units, this resulted in CRA’s total value estimate for Parktown Townhouses of approximately $21,600,000 as of May 25, 2010.

 

CRA also performed an effective gross income multiplier (EGIM) analysis. The EGIM is the ratio of the sale price of a property to its effective gross income at the time of sale. The EGIM is used to compare the income-producing characteristics of properties. In each of the appraisals, including the appraisal of Parktown Townhouses, the indicated EGIM for the appraised property, calculated by dividing the value concluded for the appraised property via the sale comparison approach by its projected effective gross income, was compared to the EGIMs produced by the sales data. In each of the appraisals, including the Parktown Townhouses appraisal, the appraised

property’s indicated EGIM fell within the range of EGIMs produced by the sales data under analysis. This comparison was made to check the reasonableness of the values concluded for the appraised properties via comparative analysis. The EGIM analysis resulted in an indicated EGIM of approximately 6.1 on a stabilized basis. CRA reported that that the indicated EGIM was aligned toward the middle of the range exhibited by the most recent transactions (5.2 to 6.5 with an average of 6.1), which is considered reasonable. CRA reported that the indicator suggested that the value concluded for the property via comparative analysis was reasonable based on the income-producing characteristics of Parktown Townhouses.

 

Reconciliation of Values and Conclusion of Appraisal.  For the appraisal of Parktown Townhouses, CRA relied principally on the income capitalization approach to valuation, and the direct capitalization method was given greatest consideration in the conclusion of value under this approach. CRA relied secondarily on the sales comparison approach, and reported that the value conclusion derived pursuant to the sales comparison approach was supportive of the conclusion derived pursuant to the income capitalization approach. The income capitalization approach using a direct capitalization method resulted in a value of $21,600,000, and the sales comparison approach resulted in a value of $21,600,000. CRA concluded that the market value of Parktown Townhouses as of May 25, 2010 was $21,600,000.

 

Signal Pointe Apartments

 

Summary of Independent Appraisal of Signal Pointe Apartments.  CRA performed a complete appraisal of Signal Pointe Apartments. The appraisal report of Signal Pointe Apartments is dated August 30, 2010 and provides an estimate of the property’s market value as of August 11, 2010. The summary set forth below describes the material conclusions reached by CRA based on the value determined under the valuation approaches and subject to the assumptions and limitations described below. According to CRA’s report, the estimated aggregate market value of Signal Pointe Apartments was $30,200,000 as of August 11, 2010. The following is a summary of the appraisal report dated August 30, 2010:

 

Valuation Under Income Capitalization Approach.  Using the income capitalization approach, CRA performed a direct capitalization analysis to derive a value for Signal Pointe Apartments.

 

The direct capitalization analysis resulted in a valuation conclusion for Signal Pointe Apartments of approximately $30,200,000.

 

The assumptions employed by CRA to determine the value of Signal Pointe Apartments under the income capitalization approach using a direct capitalization analysis included:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Using a direct capitalization analysis, CRA calculated the value of Signal Pointe Apartments by dividing the stabilized net operating income (including an allowance for reserves) by the concluded capitalization rate of 6.75%.

 

CRA calculated the market value of the fee simple interest in the Signal Pointe Apartments under the income capitalization approach of approximately $30,200,000 as of August 11, 2010.

 

Valuation Under Sales Comparison Approach.  CRA estimated the property value of Signal Pointe Apartments under the sales comparison approach by analyzing sales from the influencing market that were most similar

to Signal Pointe Apartments in terms of age, size, tenant profile and location. CRA reported that adequate sales existed to formulate a defensible value for Signal Pointe Apartments under the sales comparison approach.

 

The sales comparison approach resulted in a valuation conclusion for Signal Pointe Apartments of approximately $30,400,000.

 

In reaching a valuation conclusion for Signal Pointe Apartments, CRA examined and analyzed comparable sales of five properties in the influencing market. The sales reflected unadjusted sales prices ranging from $67,411 to $100,116 per unit. After adjustment, the comparable sales illustrated a value range of $77,523 to $86,236 per unit, with mean and median adjusted sale prices of $81,668 and $82,245 per unit, respectively. CRA gave consideration to the improvement taking place in overall market fundamentals and the recognition that the sales comparison approach is based on trailing market indicators. CRA reported that, to account for the improvement in market conditions that is taking place at the time of the report, the most dated transactions were adjusted upward. CRA estimated a value of $82,500 per unit for Signal Pointe Apartments. Applied to Signal Pointe Apartments’ 368 units, this resulted in CRA’s total value estimate for Signal Pointe Apartments of approximately $30,400,000 as of August 11, 2010.

 

CRA also performed an effective gross income multiplier (EGIM) analysis, which resulted in an indicated EGIM of approximately 7.7. CRA reported that that the indicated EGIM was well within the range exhibited by the sales transactions (6.5 to 8.5). CRA reported that the indicator suggested that the value concluded for the property via comparative analysis was reasonable based on the income-producing characteristics of Signal Pointe Apartments.

 

Reconciliation of Values and Conclusion of Appraisal.  For the appraisal of Signal Pointe Apartments, CRA relied principally on the income capitalization approach to valuation, and the direct capitalization method was given greatest consideration in the conclusion of value under this approach. CRA relied secondarily on the sales comparison approach, and reported that the value conclusion derived pursuant to the sales comparison approach was supportive of the conclusion derived pursuant to the income capitalization approach. The income capitalization approach using a direct capitalization method resulted in a value of $30,200,000, and the sales comparison approach resulted in a value of $30,400,000. CRA concluded that the market value of Signal Pointe Apartments as of August 11, 2010 was $30,200,000.

 

Assumptions, Limitations and Qualifications of CRA’s Valuation.  In preparing each of the appraisals, CRA relied, without independent verification, on the information furnished by others. Each of CRA’s appraisal reports was subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: no responsibility was assumed for the legal description or for matters including legal or title considerations, and title to each property was assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated; each property was appraised free and clear of any or all liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated; responsible ownership and competent property management were assumed; all engineering was assumed to be correct; there were no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable, and no responsibility was assumed for such conditions or for arranging for engineering studies that may be required to discover them; there was full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless noncompliance was stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report; all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless nonconformity had been stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report; all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in each report was based; the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted in either report; the distribution, if any, of the total valuation in each report between land and improvements applies only under the respective stated program of utilization; unless otherwise stated in each report, the existence of hazardous substances, including without limitation, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum leakage, or agricultural chemicals, which may or may not be present on each property, or other environmental conditions, were not called to the attention of nor did the appraiser become aware of such during the appraiser’s inspection, and the appraiser had no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property unless otherwise stated; the appraiser has not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of this property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with

the various detailed requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act; and former personal property items such as kitchen and bathroom appliances were, at the time of each appraisal report, either permanently affixed to the real estate or were implicitly part of the real estate in that tenants expect the use of such items in exchange for rent and never gain any of the rights of ownership, and the intention of the owners is not to remove the articles which are required under the implied or express warranty of habitability.

 

Compensation of Appraiser.  CRA’s fees for the appraisals totaled approximately $13,840. Aimco OP paid for the costs of the appraisals. In addition to the appraisals performed in connection with the merger, during the prior two years, CRA has been paid approximately $99,953 for appraisal services by Aimco OP and its affiliates. Except as set forth above, during the prior two years, no material relationship has existed between CRA and SP II or Aimco OP or any of their affiliates. Aimco OP believes that its relationship with CRA had no negative impact on its independence in conducting the appraisals.

 

Availability of Appraisal Reports.  You may obtain a full copy of CRA’s appraisal upon request, without charge, by contacting Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, by mail at 12 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016; by fax at (908) 497-2349; or by telephone at (800) 217-9608. In addition, the appraisal report has been filed with the SEC. For more information about how to obtain a copy of the appraisal report see “Where You Can Find Additional Information.”

 

Conflicts of Interest.  The Corporate General Partner is indirectly wholly owned by Aimco. Therefore, it has a conflict of interest with respect to the merger. The Corporate General Partner has fiduciary duties to its sole stockholder, which is wholly owned by Aimco, on the one hand, and to SP II and its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of the Corporate General Partner to SP II and its limited partners conflict with its duties to its sole stockholder, which could result in the Corporate General Partner approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict of interest. The Corporate General Partner’s desire to seek the best possible terms for SP II’s limited partners conflicts with Aimco’s interest in obtaining the best possible terms for Aimco OP.

 

No independent representative was engaged to represent the unaffiliated limited partners in negotiating the terms of the merger.  If an independent advisor had been engaged, it is possible that such advisor could have negotiated better terms for SP II’s unaffiliated limited partners.

 

Neither the amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership nor the merger agreement requires approval by a majority of the limited partners unaffiliated with Aimco OP.  Under the provisions of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership and applicable South Carolina law, the amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership must be approved by a majority in interest of the SP Units. As of October 25, 2010, Aimco OP and its affiliates owned approximately 79.52% of the outstanding SP Units, enabling them to approve the amendment without the consent or approval of any unaffiliated limited partners. Once amended, SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership will provided that the merger may be approved by SP II’s general partners and by holders of more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding SP Units.

 

The terms of the merger have not been determined in arm’s-length negotiations.  The terms of the transactions, including the merger consideration, were determined through discussions between officers and directors of the Corporate General Partner, on the one hand, and officers of Aimco, on the other. All of the officers and directors of the Corporate General Partner are also officers of Aimco. There are no independent directors of the Corporate General Partner. If the terms of the transactions had been determined through arm’s-length negotiations, the terms might be more favorable to SP II and its limited partners.

 

Alternative valuations of SP II’s properties might exceed the appraised value relied on to determine the merger consideration.  Aimco determined the merger consideration in reliance on the appraised values of SP II’s two properties. See, “Special Factors — The Appraisals,” beginning on page 8, for more information about the appraisals. Although an independent appraiser was engaged to perform complete appraisals of the properties, valuation is not an exact science. There are a number of other methods available to value real estate, each of which may result in different valuations of a property. Also, others using the same valuation methodology could make different assumptions and judgments, and obtain different results. For example, in connection with the refinancing of the mortgages encumbering Parktown Townhouses, the lender valued this property at $17,580,000, an amount that is lower than the property’s appraised value. As of June 30, 2010, Aimco internally valued Signal Pointe Apartments at $33,690,000.

 

The actual sales price of SP II’s properties could exceed the appraised value that Aimco relied on to determine the merger consideration.  On September 25, 2009, SP II and eight other entities that collectively own nine apartment complexes containing an aggregate of 2,393 units entered into a purchase and sale contract with an unaffiliated third party, Standard Portfolios LLC, to sell nine apartment complexes owned by SP II and the other eight entities to Standard Portfolios LLC for a total sales price of $156,097,000, $18,917,000 of which was allocated to Parktown Townhouses under the terms of the purchase and sale contract. The purchase and sale contract was terminated by Standard Porftolios LLC on November 13, 2009. No recent attempt has been made to market Signal Pointe Apartments to unaffiliated third parties. There can be no assurance that the properties could not be sold for a value higher than their respective appraised values used to determine the merger consideration if they were marketed to third-party buyers interested in properties of this type.

 

The merger consideration may not represent the price limited partners could obtain for their SP Units in an open market.  There is no established or regular trading market for SP Units, nor is there another reliable standard for determining the fair market value of the SP Units. The merger consideration does not necessarily reflect the price that SP II limited partners would receive in an open market for their SP Units. Such prices could be higher than the aggregate value of the merger consideration.

 

No opinion has been obtained from an independent financial advisor that the merger is fair to unaffiliated limited partners.  While the Corporate General Partner and each of the other Aimco Entities believes that the terms of the merger are fair to SP II limited partners unaffiliated with the Corporate General Partner or Aimco for the reasons discussed in “Special Factors — Fairness of the Transactions,” beginning on page 6, no opinion has been obtained as to whether the merger is fair to the limited partners of SP II unaffiliated with the Corporate General Partner or Aimco from a financial point of view.

 

Limited partners may recognize taxable gain in the merger, and that gain could exceed the merger consideration.  Limited partners who elect to receive cash in the merger will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between their “amount realized” and their adjusted tax basis in the SP Units sold. The resulting tax liability could exceed the value of the cash received in the merger.

 

Limited partners in certain jurisdictions will not be able to elect OP Units.  In those states or jurisdictions where the issuance of the OP Units hereby is not permitted (or the registration or qualification of OP Units in that state or jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), residents of those states will receive only the cash consideration in the merger.

 

For a description of risks related to an investment in Aimco and Aimco OP, please see the information set forth under “Part I — Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of each of Aimco and Aimco OP, which documents are incorporated herein by reference and are available electronically through the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, or by request to Aimco.

 

There are restrictions on the ability to transfer OP Units, and there is no public market for Aimco OP Units.  The Aimco OP partnership agreement restricts the transferability of OP Units. Until the expiration of a one-year holding period, subject to certain exceptions, investors may not transfer OP Units without the consent of Aimco OP’s general partner. Thereafter, investors may transfer such OP Units subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the general partner’s right of first refusal. There is no public market for the OP Units. Aimco OP has no plans to list any OP Units on a securities exchange. It is unlikely that any person will make a market in the OP Units, or that an active market for the OP Units will develop. If a market for the OP Units develops and the OP Units are considered “readily tradable” on a “secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof),” Aimco OP would be classified as a publicly traded partnership for United States Federal income tax purposes, which could have a material adverse effect on Aimco OP.

 

Cash distributions by Aimco OP are not guaranteed and may fluctuate with partnership performance.  Aimco OP makes quarterly distributions to holders of OP Units (on a per unit basis) that generally are equal to dividends paid on the Aimco common stock (on a per share basis). However, such distributions will not necessarily continue to be equal to such dividends. Although Aimco OP makes quarterly distributions on its OP Units, there can be no assurance regarding the amounts of available cash that Aimco OP will generate or the portion that its general partner will choose to distribute. The actual amounts of available cash will depend upon numerous factors, including profitability of operations, required principal and interest payments on our debt, the cost of acquisitions (including related debt service payments), its issuance of debt and equity securities, fluctuations in working capital, capital expenditures, adjustments in reserves, prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, some of which may be beyond Aimco OP’s control. Cash distributions depend primarily on cash flow, including from reserves, and not on profitability, which is affected by non-cash items. Therefore, cash distributions may be made during periods when Aimco OP records losses and may not be made during periods when it records profits. The Aimco OP partnership agreement gives the general partner discretion in establishing reserves for the proper

conduct of the partnership’s business that will affect the amount of available cash. Aimco is required to make reserves for the future payment of principal and interest under its credit facilities and other indebtedness. In addition, Aimco OP’s credit facility limits its ability to distribute cash to holders of OP Units. As a result of these and other factors, there can be no assurance regarding actual levels of cash distributions on OP Units, and Aimco OP’s ability to distribute cash may be limited during the existence of any events of default under any of its debt instruments.

 

Holders of OP Units are limited in their ability to effect a change of control.  The limited partners of Aimco OP are unable to remove the general partner of Aimco OP or to vote in the election of Aimco’s directors unless they own shares of Aimco. In order to comply with specific REIT tax requirements, Aimco’s charter has restrictions on the ownership of its equity securities. As a result, Aimco OP limited partners and Aimco stockholders are limited in their ability to effect a change of control of Aimco OP and Aimco, respectively.

 

Holders of OP Units have limited voting rights.  Aimco OP is managed and operated by its general partner. Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, holders of OP Units have only limited voting rights on matters affecting Aimco OP’s business. Such matters relate to certain amendments of the partnership agreement and certain transactions such as the institution of bankruptcy proceedings, an assignment for the benefit of creditors and certain transfers by the general partner of its interest in Aimco OP or the admission of a successor general partner. Holders of OP Units have no right to elect the general partner on an annual or other continuing basis, or to remove the general partner. As a result, holders of OP Units have limited influence on matters affecting the operation of Aimco OP, and third parties may find it difficult to attempt to gain control over, or influence the activities of, Aimco OP.

 

Holders of OP Units are subject to dilution.  Aimco OP may issue an unlimited number of additional OP Units or other securities for such consideration and on such terms as it may establish, without the approval of the holders of OP Units. Such securities could have priority over the OP Units as to cash flow, distributions and liquidation proceeds. The effect of any such issuance may be to dilute the interests of holders of OP Units.

 

Holders of OP Units may not have limited liability in specific circumstances.  The limitations on the liability of limited partners for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in some states. If it were determined that Aimco OP had been conducting business in any state without compliance with the applicable limited partnership statute, or that the right or the exercise of the right by the OP Unitholders as a group to make specific amendments to the agreement of limited partnership or to take other action under the agreement of limited partnership constituted participation in the “control” of Aimco OP’s business, then a holder of OP Units could be held liable under specific circumstances for Aimco OP’s obligations to the same extent as the general partner.

 

Aimco may have conflicts of interest with holders of OP Units.  Conflicts of interest have arisen and could arise in the future as a result of the relationships between the general partner of Aimco OP and its affiliates (including Aimco), on the one hand, and Aimco OP or any partner thereof, on the other. The directors and officers of the general partner have fiduciary duties to manage the general partner in a manner beneficial to Aimco, as the sole stockholder of the general partner. At the same time, as the general partner of Aimco OP, it has fiduciary duties to manage Aimco OP in a manner beneficial to Aimco OP and its limited partners. The duties of the general partner of Aimco OP to Aimco OP and its partners may therefore come into conflict with the duties of the directors and officers of the general partner to its sole stockholder, Aimco. Such conflicts of interest might arise in the following situations, among others:

 

 

 

Provisions in the Aimco OP partnership agreement may limit the ability of a holder of OP Units to challenge actions taken by the general partner.  Delaware law provides that, except as provided in a partnership agreement, a general partner owes the fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to the partnership and its limited partners. The Aimco OP partnership agreement expressly authorizes the general partner to enter into, on behalf of Aimco OP, a right of first opportunity arrangement and other conflict avoidance agreements with various affiliates of Aimco OP and the general partner, on such terms as the general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion, believes are advisable. The latitude given in the Aimco OP partnership agreement to the general partner in resolving conflicts of interest may significantly limit the ability of a holder of OP Units to challenge what might otherwise be a breach of fiduciary duty. The general partner believes, however, that such latitude is necessary and appropriate to enable it to serve as the general partner of Aimco OP without undue risk of liability.

 

The Aimco OP partnership agreement limits the liability of the general partner for actions taken in good faith. Aimco OP’s partnership agreement expressly limits the liability of the general partner by providing that the general partner, and its officers and directors, will not be liable or accountable in damages to Aimco OP, the limited partners or assignees for errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any act or omission if the general partner or such director or officer acted in good faith. In addition, Aimco OP is required to indemnify the general partner, its affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, joint or several, expenses, judgments, fines and other actions incurred by the general partner or such other persons, provided that Aimco OP will not indemnify for (i) willful misconduct or a knowing violation of the law or (ii) for any transaction for which such person received an improper personal benefit in violation or breach of any provision of the partnership agreement. The provisions of Delaware law that allow the common law fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement have not been resolved in a court of law, and the general partner has not obtained an opinion of counsel covering the provisions set forth in the Aimco OP partnership agreement that purport to waive or restrict the fiduciary duties of the general partner that would be in effect under common law were it not for the partnership agreement.

 

The following are among the United States Federal income tax considerations to be taken into account in connection with an investment in OP Units. For a general discussion of certain United States Federal income tax consequences resulting from acquiring, holding, exchanging, and otherwise disposing of OP Units, see “Material United States Federal Income Tax Matters — Taxation of Aimco OP and OP Unitholders.”

 

Aimco OP may be treated as a “publicly traded partnership” taxable as a corporation.  If Aimco OP were treated as a “publicly traded partnership” taxed as a corporation for United States Federal income tax purposes, material adverse consequences to the partners and their owners would result. In addition, Aimco would not qualify as a REIT for United States Federal income tax purposes, which would have a material adverse impact on Aimco and its shareholders. Aimco believes and intends to take the position that Aimco OP should not be treated as a “publicly traded partnership” or taxable as a corporation. No assurances can be given that the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, would not assert, or that a court would not sustain a contrary position. Accordingly, each prospective investor is urged to consult his tax advisor regarding the classification and treatment of Aimco OP as a “partnership” for United States Federal income tax purposes.

The limited partners may recognize gain on the transaction.  If a limited partner receives or is deemed to receive cash or consideration other than OP Units in connection with the merger, the receipt of such cash or other consideration would be taxable to the limited partner either as “boot” or under the “disguised sale” rules. Subject to certain exceptions, including exceptions applicable to periodic distributions of operating cash flow, any transfer or deemed transfer of cash by Aimco OP to the limited partner (or its owners), including cash paid at closing, within two years before or after a contribution of property that has an adjusted tax basis in excess of its fair market value, will generally be treated as part of a “disguised sale.” The application of the “disguised sale” rules is complex and depends, in part, upon the facts and circumstances applicable to the limited partner (and its owners), which Aimco has not undertaken to review. Accordingly, limited partners and their owners are particularly urged to consult with their tax advisors concerning the extent to which the “disguised sale” rules would apply.

 

A contribution of appreciated or depreciated property may result in special allocations to the contributing partner.  If property is contributed to Aimco OP, and the adjusted tax basis of the property differs from its fair market value, then Aimco OP tax items must be specially allocated, for United States Federal income tax purposes, in a manner chosen by Aimco OP such that the contributing partner is charged with and must recognize the unrealized gain, or benefits from the unrealized loss, associated with the property at the time of the contribution. As a result of such special allocations, the amount of net taxable income allocated to a contributing partner is likely to exceed the amount of cash distributions, if any, to which such contributing partner is entitled.

 

The Aimco OP general partner could take actions that would impose tax liability on a contributing partner.  There are a variety of transactions that Aimco OP may in its sole discretion undertake following a property contribution that could cause the transferor (or its partners) to incur a tax liability without a corresponding receipt of cash. Such transactions include, but are not limited to, the sale or distribution of a particular property and a reduction in nonrecourse debt, or certain tax elections made by Aimco OP. In addition, future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause Aimco OP to dispose of the contributed property or to reduce its debt. As permitted by the Aimco OP partnership agreement, the general partner intends to make decisions in its capacity as general partner of Aimco OP so as to maximize the profitability of Aimco OP as a whole, independent of the tax effects on individual holders of OP Units.

 

An investor’s tax liability from OP Units could exceed the cash distributions received on such OP Units.  A holder of OP Units will be required to pay United States Federal income tax on such holder’s allocable share of Aimco OP’s income, even if such holder receives no cash distributions from Aimco OP. No assurance can be given that a holder of OP Units will receive cash distributions equal to such holder’s allocable share of taxable income from Aimco OP or equal to the tax liability to such holder resulting from that income. Further, upon the sale, exchange or redemption of any OP Units, a reduction in nonrecourse debt, or upon the special allocation at the liquidation of Aimco OP, an investor may incur a tax liability in excess of the amount of cash received.

 

The following tables set forth Aimco’s selected summary historical financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. Aimco’s historical consolidated statements of income data set forth below for each of the five fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2009 and the historical consolidated balance sheet data for each of the five fiscal year-ends in the period ended December 31, 2009, are derived from information included in Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 10, 2010. Aimco’s historical consolidated statements of income data set forth below for each of the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the historical consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2010, are derived from Aimco’s unaudited interim Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

 

You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 10, 2010 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed with the SEC on July 30, 2010, which are incorporated by reference in this information statement/prospectus. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” in this information statement/prospectus.

 

 

 

The following table sets forth Aimco OP’s selected summary historical financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. Aimco OP’s historical consolidated statements of income data set forth below for each of the five fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2009 and the historical consolidated balance sheet data for each of the five fiscal year-ends in the period ended December 31, 2009, are derived from information included in Aimco OP’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 10, 2010. Aimco OP’s historical consolidated statements of income data set forth below for each of the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the historical consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2010, are derived from Aimco OP’s unaudited interim Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

 

You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with the consolidated financial statements included in Aimco OP’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 10, 2010, and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed with the SEC on July 30, 2010, which are incorporated by reference in this information statement/prospectus. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” in this information statement/prospectus.

 

 

 

The following table sets forth SP II’s selected summary historical financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. SP II’s historical statements of income and cash flow data set forth below for each of the two fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2009 and the historical balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, are derived from SP II’s financial statements included in SP II’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. SP II’s historical statements of income and cash flow data set forth below for each of the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the historical balance sheet data as of June 30, 2010, are derived from SP II’s unaudited interim Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

 

You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with the financial statements and notes to the financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 included in SP II’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 filed with the SEC on August 11, 2010, which are attached to this information statement/prospectus. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” in this information statement/prospectus.

 

 

Aimco common stock trades on the NYSE under the symbol “AIV.” The OP Units are not listed on any securities exchange and do not trade in an active secondary market. However, as described below, the trading price of Aimco common stock is considered a reasonable estimate of the fair market value of an OP Unit.

 

The OP Units are not listed on any securities exchange nor do they trade in an active secondary market. However, after a one-year holding period, OP Units are redeemable for shares of Aimco common stock (on a one-for-one basis) or cash equal to the value of such shares, as Aimco elects. As a result, the trading price of Aimco common stock is considered a reasonable estimate of the fair market value of an OP Unit. The number of OP Units offered in the merger with respect to each SP Units was calculated by dividing the per unit cash merger consideration by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. The closing price of Aimco common stock as reported on the NYSE on October 7, 2010 was $22.38.

 

The SP Units are not listed on any securities exchange nor do they trade in an active secondary market. The per unit cash merger consideration payable to each holder of SP Units is greater than the Corporate General Partner’s estimate of the proceeds that would be available for distribution to limited partners (following the repayment of debt and other liabilities) if Parktown Townhouses and Signal Pointe Apartments were sold at prices equal to their respective appraised values, given that the Corporate General Partner did not deduct certain amounts that would be payable upon an immediate sale of the properties, such as prepayment penalties on the mortgage debt of such properties.

 

The following tables summarize the historical per share information for Aimco, Aimco OP and SP II for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

Aimco is a Maryland corporation incorporated on January 10, 1994. Aimco is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, focused on the ownership and management of quality apartment communities located in the 20 largest markets in the United States (as measured by total market capitalization, which is the total market value of institutional-grade apartment properties in a particular market). Aimco upgrades the quality of its portfolio through the sale of communities with rents below average market rents and the reinvestment of capital within these 20 target markets through redevelopment and acquisitions. Aimco’s apartment properties are generally financed with property-level, non-recourse, long-dated, fixed-rate, amortizing debt. Aimco’s common stock is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “AIV.” As of June 30, 2010, Aimco owned or managed 817 apartment properties containing 129,350 units located in 43 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Aimco is one of the largest owners and operators of apartment properties in the United States.

 

As of June 30, 2010, Aimco:

 

 

Of these properties, Aimco consolidated 230 conventional properties with 70,605 units and 197 affordable properties with 23,901 units.

 

Through its wholly owned subsidiaries, AIMCO-GP, the general partner of Aimco OP, and AIMCO-LP Trust, Aimco owns a majority of the ownership interests in Aimco OP. As of June 30, 2010, Aimco held approximately 93% of the common partnership units and equivalents of Aimco OP. Aimco conducts substantially all of its business and owns substantially all of its assets through Aimco OP. Interests in Aimco OP that are held by limited partners other than Aimco include partnership common units or OP Units, partnership preferred units and high performance partnership units, or HPUs. Aimco OP’s income is allocated to holders of OP Units and equivalents based on the weighted average number of OP Units and equivalents outstanding during the period. The holders of the OP Units receive distributions, prorated from the date of issuance, in an amount equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of Aimco common stock. Holders of OP Units may redeem such units for cash or, at Aimco OP’s option, Aimco common stock. Partnership preferred units entitle the holders thereof to a preference with respect to distributions or upon liquidation. At June 30, 2010, after elimination of shares held by consolidated subsidiaries, 117,039,659 shares of Aimco common stock were outstanding and Aimco OP had 8,330,534 OP Units and equivalents outstanding for a combined total of 125,370,193 shares of Aimco common stock and Aimco OP Units outstanding (excluding partnership preferred units).

 

AIMCO/IPT, Inc. owns all of the outstanding common stock of the Corporate General Partner, and Aimco owns all of the outstanding common stock of AIMCO/IPT, Inc.

 

AIMCO/IPT, Inc. holds a 70% interest in AIMCO IPLP, L.P. as its general partner, and Aimco OP holds a 30% interest in AIMCO IPLP, L.P. as its limited partner. AIMCO/IPT, Inc. and AIMCO IPLP, L.P. share voting and dispositive power over 11,086.5 SP Units, or approximately 40.31% of the outstanding SP Units. AIMCO IPLP, L.P. also owns 100% of Cooper River Properties, L.L.C., which owns 1,958.5 SP Units, or approximately 7.12% of SP II’s outstanding SP Units.

 

AIMCO SP II Merger Sub LLC, or the Aimco Subsidiary, is a Delaware limited liability company formed on September 29, 2010, for the purpose of consummating the merger with SP II. The Aimco Subsidiary is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Aimco OP. The Aimco Subsidiary has not carried on any activities to date, except for activities incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

 

The names, positions and business addresses of the directors and executive officers of Aimco, Aimco OP, AIMCO-GP, AIMCO/IPT, Inc., AIMCO IPLP, L.P., Cooper River Properties, L.L.C., the Corporate General Partner

and the Aimco Subsidiary, as well as a biographical summary of the experience of such persons for the past five years or more, are set forth on Annex C attached hereto and are incorporated in this information statement/prospectus by reference. During the last five years, none of Aimco, Aimco-GP, AIMCO/IPT, Inc., AIMCO IPLP, L.P., Aimco OP, SP II, Cooper River Properties, L.L.C. or the Corporate General Partner nor, to the best of their knowledge, any of the persons listed in Annex C of this information statement/prospectus (i) has been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors) or (ii) was a party to a civil proceeding of a judicial or administrative body of competent jurisdiction and as a result of such proceeding was or is subject to a judgment, decree or final order enjoining further violations of or prohibiting activities subject to federal or state securities laws or finding any violation with respect to such laws. Additional information about Aimco and Aimco OP is included in documents incorporated by reference into this information statement/prospectus. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information.”

 

The following chart represents the organizational structure of the Aimco Entities:

 

 

Shelter Properties II, or SP II, was organized as a limited partnership under the law of the State of South Carolina on October 10, 1980. Commencing February 2, 1981, SP II offered, pursuant to a Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, up to 27,400 SP Units at a purchase price of $1,000 per SP Unit with a minimum purchase of 5 SP Units ($5,000), or 1.5 SP Units ($1,500) for an Individual Retirement Account. An additional 100 SP Units were purchased by the Corporate General Partner. Since its offering, the Partnership has not received, nor are limited partners required to make, additional capital contributions. The offering terminated on April 30, 1981. Upon termination of the offering, SP II had accepted subscriptions for 27,500 SP Units, including 100 SP Units purchased by the Corporate General Partner, for an aggregate of $27,500,000.

 

SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership provides that the partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2020 unless terminated prior to such date. The Corporate General Partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of Aimco.

 

SP II is engaged in the business of operating and holding real estate properties for investment. During its acquisition phase, SP II invested approximately $21,000,000 in five existing apartment properties. Between 1981 and 2005, SP II sold two properties and lost one property to the lender through foreclosure. At June 30, 2010, SP II continued to own and operate two properties: Parktown Townhouses, a 309 unit apartment project located in Deer Park, Texas, and Signal Pointe Apartments, a 368 unit apartment project located in Winter Park, Florida.

 

The average annual rental rates for each of the five years ended December 31, 2009 for each property are as follows:

 

 

The average occupancy for each of the five years ended December 31, 2009 and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 for each property is as follows:

 

 

The real estate industry is highly competitive. Both of SP II’s properties are subject to competition from other residential apartment complexes in the area. The Corporate General Partner believes that each of the properties is adequately insured. Each property is an apartment complex which leases units for terms of one year or less. No residential tenant leases 10% or more of the available rental space.

 

SP II regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the properties. In August 2007, SP II began a redevelopment project at Signal Pointe Apartments in order for the property to remain competitive in the Winter Park area. The redevelopment was completed in November 2009 at a total cost of approximately $15,433,000, of which approximately $9,617,000 was completed prior to 2009. The redevelopment consisted of major landscaping, interior, exterior and structural improvements, the addition of detached garages and storage units, upgrades to the leasing center and the conversion of two clubhouses to a fitness center and internet café. The project was funded from operations and advances from Aimco OP. During the second half of 2010, Parktown Townhouses will begin to address siding, painting and asphalt and concrete work that have been mandated by the lender, which will cost approximately $807,000. Parktown Townhouses will also begin addressing structural and foundation issues at one of its buildings (with four apartment units) at a total cost currently estimated to be $385,000.

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the mortgages encumbering SP II’s properties at June 30, 2010.

 

 

 

 

SP II presently has only SP Units issued and outstanding. The SP Units are entitled to allocations of profit and loss, and distributions, relating to SP II’s interest in both properties of SP II. As of October 25, 2010, there were 27,500 SP Units outstanding, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned 21,868.5 of those units, or approximately 79.52% of those units.

 

There were no distributions made by SP II during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 or during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated from operations, the timing of debt maturities, property sales and/or refinancings. SP II’s cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the amounts accrued and payable to affiliates at June 30, 2010, it is unlikely that SP II will generate sufficient funds from operations after planned capital expenditures to permit any distributions to its partners during 2010 or subsequent periods.

 

SP II has no employees and depends on the Corporate General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all partnership activities. The SP II certificate and agreement of limited partnership provides that the Corporate General Partner and its affiliates receive certain payments for services and reimbursement of certain expenses incurred on behalf of SP II.

 

The SP II certificate and agreement of limited partnership also provides that the Corporate General Partner and its affiliates receive 5% of gross receipts from both of SP II’s properties as compensation for providing property management services. SP II was charged by affiliates approximately $340,000 and $318,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and approximately $186,000 and $163,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner charged SP II for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $410,000 and $803,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. A portion of these reimbursements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are for

construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner of approximately $111,000 and $363,000, respectively.

 

Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner charged SP II for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $58,000 and $269,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. A portion of these reimbursements for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are for construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner of approximately $22,000 and $89,000, respectively. At June 30, 2010, SP II owed approximately $236,000 for accountable administrative expenses.

 

In connection with a redevelopment project completed in 2009 at Signal Pointe Apartments, an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner received a redevelopment planning fee of approximately $25,000 and a redevelopment supervision fee of 4% of the actual redevelopment costs, or approximately $614,000 in total based on the redevelopment costs of approximately $15,400,000. SP II was charged approximately $232,000 and $323,000 of the total redevelopment supervision fees during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Pursuant to SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership, Aimco OP advanced SP II approximately $5,810,000 and $11,457,000 during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, to fund capital improvements at Parktown Townhouses, real estate taxes at Signal Pointe Apartments and the redevelopment and construction projects and Parktown Townhouses and Signal Pointe Apartments. The interest rates charged on the outstanding advances made to SP II range from the prime rate plus 2% to a variable rate based on the prime rate plus a market rate adjustment for similar type loans. Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner review the market rate adjustment quarterly. The interest rates on outstanding advances at December 31, 2009 ranged from 5.25% to 11.19%. Interest expense was approximately $1,095,000 and $395,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2009. SP II repaid approximately $1,660,000 of advances and accrued interest. No such payments were made during the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

Pursuant to SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership, Aimco OP advanced SP II approximately $155,000 and $3,501,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to fund capital improvements at Signal Pointe Apartments, operations at Parktown Townhouses and a redevelopment project at Signal Pointe Apartments. The interest rate on outstanding advances at June 30, 2010 ranged from 5.25% to 11.19%. Interest expense was approximately $571,000 and $470,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, SP II repaid approximately $5,301,000 and $1,250,000, respectively of advances and accrued interest. At June 30, 2010, the total advances and accrued interest owed to Aimco OP were approximately $12,522,000. SP II may receive additional advances of funds from Aimco OP although Aimco OP is not obligated to provide such advances. For more information on Aimco OP, see “Where You Can Find Additional Information,” beginning on page 89 of this information statement/prospectus.

 

In connection with the second mortgage obtained on Parktown Townhouses in March 2010, the Corporate General Partner earned and received a finance fee of 1% of the new mortgage amount, or approximately $51,000, for its assistance in arranging the new financing.

 

During 1983, a payable to the general partners of approximately $58,000 was accrued for sales commissions earned. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2003, SP II accrued a sales commission due to the Corporate General Partner of approximately $47,000 related to the sale of Raintree Apartments. Pursuant to SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership, these liabilities cannot be paid until certain levels of return are received by the limited partners. As of June 30, 2010, the level of return to the limited partners has not been met.

 

SP II insures its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by Aimco, which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers’ compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. SP II insures its property above the Aimco limits through insurance policies obtained by Aimco from insurers unaffiliated with the Corporate General Partner. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, SP II was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $154,000 and $142,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, SP II was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $152,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with

policy claims administration. Additional charges will be incurred by SP II during 2010 as other insurance policies renew later in the year.

 

In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in SP II, Aimco and its affiliates owned 21,868.5 SP Units representing approximately 79.52% of the number of SP Units outstanding, at October 25, 2010. Pursuant to the SP II certificate and agreement of limited partnership, limited partners holding a majority of the units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include voting on certain amendments to the SP II certificate and agreement of limited partnership and voting to remove the Corporate General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 79.52% of the outstanding SP Units, Aimco and its affiliates are in a position to control all voting decisions with respect to SP II. Although the Corporate General Partner owes fiduciary duties to SP II’s limited partners, it also owes fiduciary duties to its sole stockholder, which is wholly owned by Aimco. As a result, the duties of the Corporate General Partner to SP II and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Corporate General Partner to its sole stockholder.

 

SP II has no directors or executive officers of its own. The names and ages of, as well as the positions and offices held by, the present directors and officers of the Corporate General Partner as of June 30, 2010 are set forth in Annex C to this information statement/prospectus. One or more of those persons are also directors and/or officers of a general partner (or general partner of a general partner) of limited partnerships which either have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Further, one or more of those persons are also officers of Aimco and the general partner of Aimco OP, entities that have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. There are no family relationships between or among any officers or directors. No remuneration was paid to SP II nor its directors or officers during the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

The board of directors of the Corporate General Partner does not have a separate audit committee. As such, the board of directors of the Corporate General Partner fulfills the functions of an audit committee. The board of directors has determined that Steven D. Cordes meets the requirement of an “audit committee financial expert.”

 

The directors and officers of the Corporate General Partner with authority over SP II are all employees of subsidiaries of Aimco. Aimco has adopted a code of ethics that applies to such directors and officers that is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com). Aimco’s website is not incorporated by reference to this filing.

 

The Corporate General Partner own all of the outstanding general partner interests in SP II, which constitute 1% of the total interests in the partnership. SP II has no directors or executive officers of its own. The Corporate General Partner is a South Carolina corporation, which is indirectly wholly owned by Aimco. SP II’s other general partner, Aimco OP, or the Other General Partner, is an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner and Aimco. None of the Corporate General Partner or any of its directors or executive officers owns any of the SP Units. The following table sets forth certain information as of October 25, 2010 with respect to the ownership by any person (including any “group,” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the SP Units.

 

 

 

 

 

For additional information about SP II and its property and operating data related to this property, see SP II’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which is included as Annex D to this information statement/prospectus, and SP II’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, which is included as Annex E to this information statement/prospectus.

 

The Corporate General Partner regularly evaluates SP II’s properties by considering various factors, such as SP II’s financial position and real estate and capital markets conditions. The Corporate General Partner monitors a property’s specific locale and sub-market conditions (including stability of the surrounding neighborhood), evaluating current trends, competition, new construction and economic changes. It oversees the operating performance of each property and continuously evaluates the physical improvement requirements. In addition, the financing structure for each property (including any prepayment penalties), tax implications to limited partners, availability of attractive mortgage financing to a purchaser, and the investment climate are all considered. Any of these factors, and possibly others, can potentially contribute to any decision by the Corporate General Partner to sell, refinance, upgrade with capital improvements or hold a partnership property.

 

In early 2010, the Corporate General Partner began to consider strategic alternatives for SP II and the two properties currently owned by SP II. The Corporate General Partner considered the costs of operating SP II, including audit, tax and SEC reporting costs. The Corporate General Partner looked at these costs, among other things, in light of Aimco’s ownership percentage and property sales since the time SP II was formed. The Corporate General Partner also considered past loans that had been made by Aimco OP to SP II, including an aggregate of $17,267,000 during 2008 and 2009, mainly consisting of advances for redevelopment at Signal Pointe Apartments and operating expenses at both properties. During 2009, SP II repaid approximately $1,660,000 of advances and accrued interest, primarily with insurance proceeds. Thus far during 2010, SP II repaid approximately $5,891,000 of advances and accrued interest, primarily with proceeds from a refinancing of Parktown Townhouses. Aimco OP has indicated an unwillingness to make additional advances to SP II.

 

On March 10, 2010, Mr. Terry Considine, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Aimco, and Mr. Derek McCandless, Senior Vice President, Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Aimco and the Managing Corporate General Partner, met to discuss strategic alternatives for the two properties currently owned by SP II. Messrs. Considine and McCandless agreed to explore the possibility of Aimco OP acquiring one or both of SP II’s properties through a transaction that would provide the unaffiliated limited partners with the opportunity to defer tax gain through an exchange of SP Units for OP Units.

 

During March and April 2010, Mr. McCandless sought advice from representatives of Skalden, Arps, Slate, Meagler of Flom, LLP, outside legal and tax counsel, to determine whether a transaction would be feasible that would result in Aimco OP’s ownership of one or both of SP II’s properties while also providing potential tax deferral to the unaffiliated limited partners. Because Aimco OP’s interest related primarily to Parktown Townhouses, the Corporate General Partner decided to obtain an appraisal to determine the value of Parktown Townhouses and to evaluate the proceeds and tax consequences to limited partners in such a transaction.

 

Also during March and April 2010, Mr. McCandless spoke with different appraisers regarding the possibility of appraising Parktown Townhouses for purposes of a potential acquisition by Aimco OP. On April 13, 2010, the Corporate General Partner engaged CRA to appraise Parktown Townhouses.

 

On June 11, 2010, CRA informed Mr. McCandless that it had valued Parktown Townhouses at $21,600,000. During the following two weeks, Mr. McCandless discussed CRA’s assumptions and valuation with Mr. John Bezzant, Senior Vice President — Transactions of Aimco and a Director and Senior Vice President of the Managing Corporate General Partner, and Mr. Nikhil Venkatesh, Vice President — Portfolio Strategy of Aimco and Vice President of the Managing Corporate General Partner. Mr. Bezzant reviewed the $21,600,000 value in light of fiduciary duties owed to unaffiliated limited partners and Aimco OP’s investment criteria. Aimco OP’s investment criteria was to acquire the property at a price that did not significantly exceed Aimco OP’s estimate of the value of the property, which it calculated by adding the appraised value of the property to other assets and deducting therefrom the amount of liabilities associated with the property, including mortgage debt (but excluding prepayment penalty). Mr. Bezzant determined that Aimco OP would pay the appraised value for Parktown Townhouses.

 

In July 2010, while Aimco OP was preparing to move forward with a transaction involving Parktown Townhouses based on its appraised value, Mr. Bezzant discussed with Mr. McCandless the possibility of Aimco OP

acquiring Signal Pointe Apartments from SP II as well. Messrs. Bezzant and McCandless corresponded with Mr. Considine, and Mr. Considine agreed to move forward with obtaining an appraisal of Signal Pointe Apartments. On July 27, 2010, Mr. McCandless contacted CRA to begin work on an appraisal of Signal Pointe Apartments.

 

On August 30, 2010, CRA informed Mr. McCandless that it valued Signal Pointe Apartments at $30,200,000. During the following weeks, Mr. McCandless discussed CRA’s assumptions and valuation with Messrs. Bezzant and Venkatesh. Mr. Bezzant reviewed the $30,200,000 value in light of fiduciary duties owed to unaffiliated limited partners and Aimco OP’s investment criteria, which is described in more detail, above. Mr. Bezzant determined that Aimco OP would pay the appraised value for Signal Pointe Apartments.

 

On October 8, 2010, the Corporate General Partner’s board of directors held a meeting to discuss the proposed merger. The board decided to approve and effect a transaction with Aimco OP that would give Aimco OP ownership of SP II and, indirectly, both of its properties. On October 8, 2010, the Corporate General Partner authorized and approved the transactions. The Corporate General Partner and the Aimco Entities considered a number of possible alternatives to the proposed merger with the Aimco Subsidiary, as described in greater detail above. However, the Corporate General Partner ultimately determined that the proposed merger with the Aimco Subsidiary is in the best interests of SP II and its limited partners.

 

Prior to entering into the proposed merger agreement, SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership will be amended to provide that a majority in interest of the SP Units may approve business combination transactions involving SP II, including the merger contemplated by the proposed merger agreement. The proposed amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership is included in this information statement/prospectus as Annex F.

 

In the merger, each SP Unit outstanding immediately prior to consummation of the merger will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of such SP Unit, either $350.64 in cash or equivalent value in Aimco OP Units, except in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units in this transaction (or registration would be prohibitively costly). Because Aimco indirectly wholly owns the Corporate General Partner, the merger consideration has not been determined in an arm’s-length negotiation. In order to arrive at a fair consideration, CRA, an independent real estate appraisal firm, was engaged to perform a complete appraisal of SP II’s properties. For more detailed information about the independent appraiser’s determination of the estimated value of the properties, see “Special Factors — The Appraisals.” The per unit cash merger consideration payable to each holder of SP Units is greater than the Corporate General Partner’s estimate of the proceeds that would be available for distribution to limited partners (following the repayment of debt and other liabilities) if Parktown Townhouses and Signal Pointe Apartments were sold at prices equal to their respective appraised values, given that the Corporate General Partner did not deduct certain amounts that would be payable upon an immediate sale of the properties, such as prepayment penalties on the mortgage debt of such properties (currently estimated to be $9,079,343). The Corporate General Partner calculated the net proceeds available to all partners by (i) adding to the appraised value the value of any other non-real estate assets of SP II that would not be included in the appraisal; and (ii) deducting all liabilities, including mortgage debt, debt owed to the Corporate General Partner or its affiliates, accounts payable and accrued expenses and certain other costs. The amount of liabilities deducted includes an estimate of $270,800 for expenses attributable to the properties that would be incurred prior to the merger but

payable after the merger. This calculation, which is summarized below, resulted in per unit cash merger consideration of $350.64.

 

 

The number of OP Units offered per SP Unit was calculated by dividing the per unit cash merger consideration by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. Although there is no public market for OP Units, after a one-year holding period, each OP Unit is generally redeemable for cash in an amount equal to the value of one share of Aimco common stock at the time, subject to Aimco’s right to acquire each OP Unit in exchange for one share of Aimco common stock (subject to antidilution adjustments). Therefore, the Corporate General Partner considers the trading price of Aimco common stock to be a reasonable estimate of the fair market value of an OP Unit. As of October 25, 2010, the average closing price of Aimco common stock over the preceding ten consecutive trading days was $22.96, which would have resulted in OP Unit consideration of 15.27 OP Units per SP Unit.

 

The Corporate General Partner is indirectly wholly owned by Aimco. Therefore, it has a conflict of interest with respect to the merger. The Corporate General Partner has fiduciary duties to its sole stockholder, which is wholly owned by Aimco, on the one hand, and to SP II and its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of the Corporate General Partner to SP II and its limited partners conflict with its duties to its sole stockholder, which could result in the Corporate General Partner approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict of interest. The Corporate General Partner’s desire to seek the best possible terms for SP II’s limited partners conflicts with Aimco’s interest in obtaining the best possible terms for Aimco OP.

 

The parties to a going private transaction such as the proposed transaction are often subject to claims alleging that the transaction is unfair to unaffiliated security holders. Litigation in these situations can arise even if the transaction is ultimately found to be fair to the unaffiliated security holders. In order to attempt to reduce the probability of any such claims, and the related costs of defending against any such claims, Aimco OP has decided to offer unaffiliated limited partners, in addition to the merger consideration, an additional payment of $17.76 per SP Unit in exchange for executing a waiver and release of potential claims the limited partner may have against the Releasees (as defined below). The amount of $17.76 per unit was determined by dividing $100,000 by the number of outstanding SP Units held by unaffiliated limited partners. This $100,000 amount represents Aimco OP’s estimate of the value of such a release in potentially reducing its costs to defend against such claims. Unaffiliated limited partners may elect to receive the additional consideration by completing the election form, executing the waiver and release that is attached to the election form and returning the election form and the executed waiver and release in accordance with the instructions provided. In executing the waiver and release, the limited partner, on

behalf of himself, his heirs, estate, executor, administrator, successors and assigns, will release Aimco OP and its predecessors, successors and assigns and its present and former parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, investors, insurers, reinsurers, officers, directors, employees, agents, administrators, auditors, attorneys, accountants, information and solicitation agents, investment bankers, and other representatives, including, but not limited to, Aimco and the Corporate General Partners (collectively, the “Releasees”), from any and all claims and causes of action, whether brought individually, on behalf of a class, or derivatively, demands, rights, or liabilities, including, but not limited to, claims for negligence, gross negligence, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty (including, but not limited to, duties of care, loyalty or candor), mismanagement, corporate waste, misrepresentation, whether intentional or negligent, misstatements and omissions to disclose, breach of contract, violations of any state or federal statutes, rules or regulations, whether known claims or unknown claims, whether past claims, present claims or future claims through and including the date of the consummation of the merger, including, but not limited to, those claims that have arisen or arise, directly or indirectly, out of or relate, directly or indirectly, to (a) the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (excluding only such unaffiliated limited partner’s rights, if any, under the merger agreement), (b) any other circumstance, agreement, activity, action, omission, event or matter occurring or existing on or prior to the date of the consummation of the merger, (c) the ownership of any limited partnership interest in SP II, including, but not limited to, any and all claims related to the management of SP II or the properties owned by SP II (whether currently or previously), the payment of management fees or other monies to the Corporate General Partners and to affiliates of SP II and prior sales of properties, or (d) the purchase, acquisition, holding, sale or voting of one or more limited partnership interests in SP II (collectively, the “Released Claims”).

 

The waiver and release do not apply to claims limited partners may have under the federal securities laws.

 

Each unaffiliated limited partner who elects to execute the waiver and release and to receive the additional cash payment will expressly waive and relinquish, to the fullest extent permitted by law and consistent with the release, the provisions, rights and benefits of Section 1542 of the Civil Code of California, or Section 1542, which provides:

 

A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN ITS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.

 

Each unaffiliated limited partner who elects to execute the waiver and release and to receive the additional cash payment will waive any and all provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law, that is similar, comparable or equivalent to Section 1542. Each unaffiliated limited partner who elects to execute the waiver and release and to receive the additional cash payment will acknowledge and agree that he may later discover facts in addition to or different from those which he or she now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but such unaffiliated limited partner will be deemed to have fully, finally and forever settled and released any and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, that now exist or may arise in the future through and including the date of the consummation of the merger under any theory of law or equity now existing, including, but not limited to, conduct that is negligent, intentional, with malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery of the existence of such different or additional facts.

 

Each unaffiliated limited partner who elects to execute the waiver and release and to receive the additional cash payment will agree that the release is intended to include the Released Claims which such unaffiliated limited partner may have and which such unaffiliated limited partner does not know or suspect to exist in its favor against the Releasees, and that the release extinguishes those claims. Each unaffiliated limited partner who elects to execute the waiver and release and to receive the additional cash payment will represent and warrant to the Releasees that such unaffiliated limited partner has not assigned or otherwise transferred or subrogated any interest in the Released Claims.

 

After the merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner in SP II, and will own all of the outstanding SP Units. The Corporate General Partner, the Other General Partner and SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership in effect immediately prior to the merger will remain unchanged after the merger. Aimco OP intends to retain the SP Units after the merger. After the merger, Aimco will evaluate the capital improvement needs of the

property, and anticipates making certain routine capital expenditures with respect to the properties during the remainder of 2010.

 

For a discussion of the material United States federal income tax consequences of the merger, see “Material United States Federal Income Tax Matters — United States Federal Income Tax Consequences Relating to the Merger.”

 

No material federal or state regulatory requirements must be satisfied or approvals obtained in connection with the merger, except (1) filing a registration statement that includes this information statement/prospectus with the SEC and obtaining the SEC’s declaration that the registration statement is effective under the Securities Act, (2) registration or qualification of the issuance of OP Units under state securities laws, and (3) filing articles of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of South Carolina.

 

Aimco and Aimco OP will treat the merger as a purchase of noncontrolling interests for financial accounting purposes. This means that Aimco and Aimco OP will recognize any difference between the purchase price for these noncontrolling interests and the carrying amount of such noncontrolling interests in Aimco and Aimco OP’s consolidated financial statements as an adjustment to the amounts of consolidated equity and partners’ capital attributed to Aimco and Aimco OP, respectively.

 

Limited partners are not entitled to dissenters’ appraisal rights under applicable law or SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership in connection with the merger. However, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Aimco OP will provide each limited partner with contractual dissenters’ appraisal rights that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights available to a stockholder of a corporation in a merger under Delaware law. These contractual appraisal rights will enable a limited partner to obtain an appraisal of the value of the limited partner’s SP Units in connection with the merger. Prosecution of these contractual appraisal rights will involve an arbitration proceeding, and the consideration paid to a limited partner after the prosecution of such contractual appraisal rights, which will take a period of time that cannot be predicted with accuracy, will be a cash payment, resulting in a taxable event to such limited partner. A description of the appraisal rights being provided, and the procedures that a limited partner must follow to seek such rights, is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex B.

 

The costs of planning and implementing the merger, including the cash merger consideration and the preparation of this information statement/prospectus, will be borne by Aimco OP without regard to whether the merger is effectuated. The estimated amount of these costs is approximately $2,236,245 (assuming all limited partners elect to receive the cash merger consideration and all limited partners unaffiliated with Aimco OP elect to receive an additional cash payment in exchange for executing a waiver and release). Aimco OP is paying for the costs of the merger with funds on hand or from drawings under its revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility is pursuant to Aimco OP’s Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement, as amended, with a syndicate of financial institutions, with Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer. As of September 30, 2010, the Credit Agreement consisted of $300.0 million of revolving loan commitments. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest based on a pricing grid determined by leverage (either at LIBOR plus 4.25% with a LIBOR floor of 1.50% or, at Aimco OP’s option, a base rate equal to the Prime rate plus a spread of 3.00%). The revolving credit facility matures May 1, 2013, and may be extended for an additional year, subject to certain conditions, including payment of a 35.0 basis point fee on the total revolving commitments. The amount available under the revolving credit facility at September 30, 2010, was $258.7 million (after giving effect to $41.3 million outstanding for undrawn letters of credit issued under the revolving credit

facility). The proceeds of revolving loans are generally permitted to be used to fund working capital and for other corporate purposes.

 

Under South Carolina law, the amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership must be approved by SP II’s general partners and by holders of a majority of the outstanding SP Units. Once amended, SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership will provide that the merger may be approved by SP II’s general partners and by a majority of the outstanding SP Units. SP II’s general partners have determined that the amendment and the proposed merger are advisable and in the best interests of SP II and its limited partners and have approved the amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership, the proposed merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. As of October 25, 2010, there were issued and outstanding 27,500 SP Units, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned 21,868.5 of those units, or approximately 79.52% of the number of units outstanding. Aimco OP and its affiliates have indicated that they intend to take action by written consent, as permitted under the partnership agreement, to approve the amendment, the proposed merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby on or about          , 2010. As a result, approval of the transactions is assured, and your consent is not required. Aimco OP has approved the merger on behalf of the Aimco Subsidiary.

 

The following is a summary of the material terms of the merger agreement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger agreement, which is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex A. You should read the merger agreement carefully in its entirety as it is the legal document that governs this merger.

 

Following the amendment of SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership, SP II plans to enter into the merger agreement. Under the merger agreement, at the effective time of the merger, the Aimco Subsidiary will be merged with and into SP II, with SP II as the surviving entity. The Aimco Subsidiary is a wholly owned subsidiary of Aimco OP and was formed for the purpose of effecting the merger with SP II. Aimco indirectly wholly owns the Corporate General Partner and, together with its affiliates, owns a majority of SP II’s outstanding SP Units. In the merger, each SP Unit outstanding immediately prior to consummation of the merger will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of such SP Unit, either $350.64 in cash or equivalent value in Aimco OP Units (calculated by dividing $350.64 by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the merger); provided, however, that if Aimco OP determines that the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of Aimco OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction (or that registration or qualification in that state or jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), then such limited partner will only be entitled to receive $350.64 in cash for each SP Unit. Aimco OP’s interest in the Aimco Subsidiary will be converted into SP Units. As a result, after the merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of SP II and will own all of the outstanding SP Units.

 

The Corporate General Partner’s and the Other General Partner’s general partner interest in SP II will remain unchanged after the merger, and the certificate and agreement of limited partnership of SP II as in effect immediately prior to the consummation of the merger will be the certificate and agreement of limited partnership of SP II after the merger, until thereafter amended in accordance with the provisions thereof and applicable law.

 

None of the parties to the merger agreement are required to consummate the merger if any third party consent, authorization or approval that any of the parties deems necessary or desirable in connection with the merger agreement, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, has not been obtained or received.

 

The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger may be abandoned at any time prior to consummation of the merger, without liability to any party to the merger agreement, by SP II, Aimco OP or the Aimco Subsidiary, in each case, acting in its sole discretion and for any reason or for no reason, notwithstanding the approval of the merger agreement by any of the partners of SP II or the member of the Aimco Subsidiary.

 

Subject to applicable law, the merger agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented by written agreement of the parties at any time prior to the consummation of the merger with respect to any of the terms contained therein.

 

The merger agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without reference to the conflict of law provisions thereof.

 

Limited partners are not entitled to dissenters’ appraisal rights under applicable law or SP II’s certificate and agreement of limited partnership in connection with the merger. However, pursuant to the terms of the merger

agreement, Aimco OP will provide each limited partner with contractual dissenters’ appraisal rights that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights available to a stockholder of a corporation in a merger under Delaware law. These contractual appraisal rights will enable a limited partner to obtain an appraisal of the value of the limited partner’s SP Units in connection with the merger. Prosecution of these contractual appraisal rights will involve an arbitration proceeding, and the consideration paid to a limited partner after the prosecution of such contractual appraisal rights, which will take a period of time that cannot be predicted with accuracy, will be a cash payment, resulting in a taxable event to such limited partner. A description of the appraisal rights being provided, and the procedures that a limited partner must follow to seek such rights, is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex B.

 

Within ten (10) days after the effective time of the merger, Aimco OP will prepare and mail to the former holders of SP Units an election form pursuant to which such holders can elect to receive cash or OP Units. Limited partners may also elect appraisal of their SP Units pursuant to the election form. Holders of SP Units may elect their form of consideration by completing and returning the election form in accordance with its instructions. If the information agent does not receive a properly completed election form from a holder before 5:00 p.m., New York time on the 30th day after the merger, the holder will be deemed to have elected to receive the cash consideration. Former holders of SP Units may also use the election form to elect to receive, in lieu of the merger consideration, the appraised value of their SP Units, determined through an arbitration proceeding.

 

In addition, limited partners who are not affiliated with Aimco OP may elect to receive an additional cash payment of $17.76 per SP Unit in exchange for executing a waiver and release of certain claims. In order to receive such additional consideration, limited partners must complete the election form, execute the waiver and release that is attached to the election form and return both the election form and the executed waiver and release to the information agent as described above.

 

The following description sets forth some general terms and provisions of the Aimco OP partnership agreement. The following description of the Aimco OP partnership agreement is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the agreement.

 

Aimco OP is a limited partnership organized under the provisions of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended from time to time, or any successor to such statute, or the Delaware Act, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in its agreement of limited partnership. AIMCO-GP, a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Aimco, is the sole general partner of Aimco OP. Another wholly owned subsidiary of Aimco, AIMCO-LP Trust, a Delaware trust, or the special limited partner, is a limited partner in Aimco OP. The term of Aimco OP commenced on May 16, 1994, and will continue in perpetuity, unless Aimco OP is dissolved sooner under the provisions of the partnership agreement or as otherwise provided by law.

 

The purpose and nature of Aimco OP is to conduct any business, enterprise or activity permitted by or under the Delaware Act, including, but not limited to, (i) to conduct the business of ownership, construction, development and operation of multifamily rental apartment communities, (ii) to enter into any partnership, joint venture, business trust arrangement, limited liability company or other similar arrangement to engage in any business permitted by or under the Delaware Act, or to own interests in any entity engaged in any business permitted by or under the Delaware Act, (iii) to conduct the business of providing property and asset management and brokerage services, whether directly or through one or more partnerships, joint ventures, subsidiaries, business trusts, limited liability companies or other similar arrangements, and (iv) to do anything necessary or incidental to the foregoing; provided, however, such business and arrangements and interests may be limited to and conducted in such a manner as to permit Aimco, in the sole and absolute discretion of the general partner, at all times to be classified as a REIT.

 

Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement, all management powers over the business and affairs of Aimco OP are exclusively vested in the general partner. No limited partner of Aimco OP or any other person to whom one or more OP Units have been transferred (each, an “assignee”) may take part in the operations, management or control (within the meaning of the Delaware Act) of Aimco OP’s business, transact any business in Aimco OP’s name or have the power to sign documents for or otherwise bind Aimco OP. The general partner may not be removed by the limited partners with or without cause, except with the consent of the general partner. In addition to the powers granted to a general partner of a limited partnership under applicable law or that are granted to the general partner under any other provision of the Aimco OP partnership agreement, the general partner, subject to the other provisions of the Aimco OP partnership agreement, has full power and authority to do all things deemed necessary or desirable by it to conduct the business of Aimco OP, to exercise all powers of Aimco OP and to effectuate the purposes of Aimco OP. Aimco OP may incur debt or enter into other similar credit, guarantee, financing or refinancing arrangements for any purpose (including, without limitation, in connection with any acquisition of properties) upon such terms as the general partner determines to be appropriate. The general partner is authorized to execute, deliver and perform specific agreements and transactions on behalf of Aimco OP without any further act, approval or vote of the limited partners.

 

Restrictions on General Partner’s Authority.  The general partner may not take any action in contravention of the Aimco OP partnership agreement. The general partner may not, without the prior consent of the limited partners, undertake, on behalf of Aimco OP, any of the following actions or enter into any transaction that would have the effect of such transactions: (i) except as provided in the partnership agreement, amend, modify or terminate the partnership agreement other than to reflect the admission, substitution, termination or withdrawal of partners; (ii) make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors or appoint or acquiesce in the appointment of a custodian, receiver or trustee for all or any part of the assets of Aimco OP; (iii) institute any proceeding for bankruptcy on

behalf of Aimco OP; or (iv) subject to specific exceptions, approve or acquiesce to the transfer of Aimco OP interest of the general partner, or admit into Aimco OP any additional or successor general partners.

 

Additional Limited Partners.  The general partner is authorized to admit additional limited partners to Aimco OP from time to time, on terms and conditions and for such capital contributions as may be established by the general partner in its reasonable discretion. The net capital contribution need not be equal for all partners. No action or consent by the limited partners is required in connection with the admission of any additional limited partner. The general partner is expressly authorized to cause Aimco OP to issue additional interests (i) upon the conversion, redemption or exchange of any debt, OP Units or other securities issued by Aimco OP, (ii) for less than fair market value, so long as the general partner concludes in good faith that such issuance is in the best interests of the general partner and Aimco OP, and (iii) in connection with any merger of any other entity into Aimco OP if the applicable merger agreement provides that persons are to receive interests in Aimco OP in exchange for their interests in the entity merging into Aimco OP. Subject to Delaware law, any additional partnership interests may be issued in one or more classes, or one or more series of any of such classes, with such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, powers and duties as shall be determined by the general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion without the approval of any limited partner, and set forth in a written document thereafter attached to and made an exhibit to the partnership agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the general partner has authority to specify (a) the allocations of items of partnership income, gain, loss, deduction and credit to each such class or series of partnership interests; (b) the right of each such class or series of partnership interests to share in distributions; (c) the rights of each such class or series of partnership interests upon dissolution and liquidation of Aimco OP; (d) the voting rights, if any, of each such class or series of partnership interests; and (e) the conversion, redemption or exchange rights applicable to each such class or series of partnership interests. No person may be admitted as an additional limited partner without the consent of the general partner, which consent may be given or withheld in the general partner’s sole and absolute discretion.

 

As of June 30, 2010, Aimco OP had issued and outstanding the following partnership interests: