e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-23550
Fentura Financial, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-2806518 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employee Identification No.) |
175 N Leroy, P.O. Box 725, Fenton, Michigan 48430
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(810) 629-2263
(Registrants
telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer
and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: July 25, 2011
|
|
|
Class Common Stock
|
|
Shares Outstanding 2,349,051 |
Fentura Financial, Inc.
Index to Form 10-Q
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(000s omitted except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
22,481 |
|
|
$ |
11,592 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
21,900 |
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
27,481 |
|
|
|
33,492 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
53,535 |
|
|
|
41,875 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
3,648 |
|
|
|
4,350 |
|
|
|
|
Total securities |
|
|
57,183 |
|
|
|
46,225 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
43,327 |
|
|
|
43,395 |
|
Real estate loans commercial |
|
|
105,828 |
|
|
|
116,381 |
|
Real estate loans residential |
|
|
20,759 |
|
|
|
19,046 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
27,003 |
|
|
|
29,153 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
196,917 |
|
|
|
207,975 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(8,928 |
) |
|
|
(10,027 |
) |
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
187,989 |
|
|
|
197,948 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
5,869 |
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
Bank premises and equipment |
|
|
10,226 |
|
|
|
10,335 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
2,742 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
9,011 |
|
|
|
122,968 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
2,078 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
303,333 |
|
|
$ |
424,228 |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
63,817 |
|
|
$ |
55,044 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
204,295 |
|
|
|
220,933 |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
268,112 |
|
|
|
275,977 |
|
Short term borrowings |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
113,321 |
|
Accrued taxes, interest and other liabilities |
|
|
3,184 |
|
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
286,922 |
|
|
|
408,173 |
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized,
2,349,051 shares outstanding at June 30, 2011
(2,308,765 at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
43,099 |
|
|
|
43,036 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(26,977 |
) |
|
|
(27,042 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
16,411 |
|
|
|
16,055 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
303,333 |
|
|
$ |
424,228 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(000s omitted except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
2,843 |
|
|
$ |
3,538 |
|
|
$ |
5,860 |
|
|
$ |
7,130 |
|
Interest and dividends on securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
Interest on federal funds sold |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
3,856 |
|
|
|
6,584 |
|
|
|
7,788 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
2,191 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
2,444 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
2,672 |
|
|
|
4,956 |
|
|
|
5,344 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
1,525 |
|
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
3,431 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
Trust and investment services income |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
Gain on sale of mortgage loans |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Other income and fees |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
3,296 |
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
Loan and collection |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
Advertising and promotional |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
2,970 |
|
|
|
3,377 |
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
|
|
6,655 |
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(1,818 |
) |
|
|
(652 |
) |
|
|
(2,444 |
) |
Federal income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(136 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(284 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,551 |
) |
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(712 |
) |
Gain from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(245 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,780 |
) |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
(3,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.99 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(1.44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(000s omitted except share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
43,036 |
|
|
$ |
42,913 |
|
Issuance of shares under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director stock purchase plan and
dividend reinvestment program (40,286 and
27,888 shares) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
43,099 |
|
|
|
42,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(27,042 |
) |
|
|
(21,657 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(3,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
(26,977 |
) |
|
|
(24,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(724 |
) |
Change in unrealized gain on securities, net of tax |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
$ |
16,411 |
|
|
$ |
17,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
(3,263 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,525 |
|
|
|
3,584 |
|
Loans originated for sale |
|
|
(6,377 |
) |
|
|
(12,999 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of loans |
|
|
6,457 |
|
|
|
12,046 |
|
Gain on sales of loans |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
(Gain) loss on other real estate owned |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
148 |
|
Write downs on other real estate owned |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Earnings from bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
Net decrease in interest receivable & other assets |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
Net increase in interest payable & other liabilities |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
Net change in discontinued operations operating activities |
|
|
10,638 |
|
|
|
4,952 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
13,048 |
|
|
|
6,323 |
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of securities HTM |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of securities AFS |
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
8,054 |
|
Proceeds from calls of securities HTM |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
Proceeds from calls of securities AFS |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Proceeds from sales of securities AFS |
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
6,760 |
|
Purchases of securities AFS |
|
|
(17,714 |
) |
|
|
(9,314 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of bank subsidiary |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Net decrease in loans |
|
|
7,774 |
|
|
|
11,604 |
|
Repurchase of FHLB Stock |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Sales of other real estate owned |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
Acquisition of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
Net change in discontinued operations investing activities |
|
|
93,229 |
|
|
|
35,615 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
92,968 |
|
|
|
56,633 |
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
(7,865 |
) |
|
|
(22,612 |
) |
Net decrease in short term borrowings |
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Net proceeds from stock issuance |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Net change in discontinued operations financing activities |
|
|
(103,942 |
) |
|
|
(36,845 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(112,027 |
) |
|
|
(59,577 |
) |
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(6,011 |
) |
|
|
3,379 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents Beginning |
|
|
33,492 |
|
|
|
31,640 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents Ending |
|
|
27,180 |
|
|
|
44,493 |
|
Less cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
9,474 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations |
|
$ |
27,481 |
|
|
$ |
35,019 |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
1,216 |
|
|
$ |
619 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Non-cash Disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from loans to other real estate |
|
$ |
660 |
|
|
$ |
1,922 |
|
6
FENTURA FINANICIAL, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(245 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,780 |
) |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
(3,263 |
) |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in income |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Unrealized holding (losses) gains related to
available-for-sale securities arising during period |
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
Tax effect |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
(2,377 |
) |
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
(2,698 |
) |
|
|
|
7
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements include Fentura Financial, Inc. (the Corporation) and its
wholly owned subsidiary The State Bank in Fenton, Michigan; and reported as discontinued
operations, Fentura Holdings LLC (FHLLC), Davison State Bank in Davison, Michigan and West
Michigan Community Bank in Hudsonville, Michigan and the other subsidiaries of the Banks.
Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
In 2009, the Corporation entered into an agreement to sell one of its bank subsidiaries, Davison
State Bank, to a private, nonaffiliated investor group. This sale closed on April 30, 2010.
Additionally, the Corporation entered into an agreement to sell West Michigan Community Bank to a
third-party investor group. This sale closed on January 31, 2011. Both subsidiaries are reported
as discontinued operations. See Note 9 for further discussion.
Financial statements are presented with discontinued operations sequestered on the balance sheet,
operations statement and statement of cash flows. The presentations have been updated for June 30,
2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 to reflect the discontinued operations results.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
information and the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they
do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2011. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements
and footnotes thereto included in the Corporations annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
Securities: Securities are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost
when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Securities are
classified as available for sale when they might be sold before maturity. Securities available for
sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other
comprehensive income, net of tax.
8
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on
securities are amortized on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for
mortgage-
backed securities, where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are based on the
amortized cost of the security sold.
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
In determining OTTI management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the
extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions,
and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt security or it is more likely than not
will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of
whether an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment
and is based on the information available to management at a point in time.
When OTTI occurs, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity
intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss. If an entity
intends to sell or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss, the OTTI shall be
recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investments amortized cost basis
and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and
it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period loss, the OTTI shall be separated into
the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of
the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows
expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to
other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous
amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of
the investment.
Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for
probable incurred credit losses, increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by
charge-offs less recoveries. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan
loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower
situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors. Allocations of
the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan
that, in managements judgment, should be charged-off. Loan losses are charged against the
allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Consumer
loans are typically charged off no later than 120 days past due.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans
that are individually classified as impaired or loans otherwise classified as substandard or
doubtful. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss
experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio
segments and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Corporation over the most
recent three years. This actual loss experience is supplemented with other economic factors based
on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These economic factors include consideration of
the following: levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans; levels of and trends in
charge-offs and recoveries; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of any changes in risk
selection and underwriting standards; other changes in lending policies, procedures, and practices;
experience, ability and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; national and local
economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; and effects of
9
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
changes in credit concentrations. The following portfolio segments have been identified:
commercial, commercial real estate, residential mortgage, installment loans and home equity loans.
A loan is impaired when full payment under the loan terms is not expected. Commercial and
commercial real estate loans are individually evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a
portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of
estimated future cash flows using the loans existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if
repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous
loans, such as consumer and residential real estate loans are collectively evaluated for
impairment, and accordingly, they are not separately identified for impairment disclosures. Loans
for which the terms have been modified and for which the borrower is experiencing financial
difficulties, are considered troubled debt restructurings and are classified as impaired. Troubled
debt restructurings are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the
loans effective rate at inception. If a troubled debt restructuring is considered to be a
collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral.
Other Real Estate Owned and Foreclosed Assets: Assets acquired through or instead of loan
foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs when acquired,
establishing a new cost basis. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through
expense. Costs after acquisition are expensed.
Income Taxes: Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or
refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying
amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation
allowance reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is more likely than not that the tax
position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur.
The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being
realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the more likely than not test, no tax
benefit is recorded.
The Corporation recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax
expense. There were no such interest or penalties in 2011 or 2010.
Dividend Restrictions: Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and
may limit the dividends paid by the Banks to the Corporation or by the Corporation to shareholders.
The State Bank has been restricted from dividend payments due to the signing of a Consent Order
with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Holding Company has been placed under
restrictions by the Federal Reserve regarding the declaration or payment of any dividends and the
receipt of dividends from its subsidiary Bank.
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plans: Compensation cost is recognized for stock options
and restricted stock awards issued to employees, based on the fair value of these awards at the
date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options,
while the market price of the Corporations common stock at the date of grant is used for
restricted stock awards. Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period,
generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
10
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
The Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan provides for granting options to nonemployee directors
to purchase the Corporations common stock. The purchase price of the shares is the fair market
value at the date of the grant, and there is a three-year vesting period before options may be
exercised. Options to acquire no more than 8,131 shares of stock may be granted under the Plan in
any calendar year and options to acquire not more than 73,967 shares in the aggregate may be
outstanding at any one time. No options were granted in 2011 or 2010.
The Employee Stock Option Plan grants options to eligible employees to purchase the Corporations
common stock at or above, the fair market value of the stock at the date of the grant. Awards
granted under this plan are limited to an aggregate of 86,936 shares. The administrator of the
plan is a committee of directors. The administrator has the power to determine the number of
options to be granted, the exercise price of the options and other terms of the options, subject to
consistency with the terms of the Plan.
The following table summarizes stock option activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average Price |
|
Options outstanding and exercisable at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
18,872 |
|
|
$ |
29.32 |
|
Options forfeited in 2011 |
|
|
2,238 |
|
|
$ |
20.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
16,634 |
|
|
$ |
30.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three month period ended June 30, 2011, there were no shares of stock forfeited.
On February 24, 2011, the Corporations board of directors granted 25,000 Stock Appreciation Rights
(SARs) to five executives. The terms of the Stock Appreciation Rights Agreements (the SAR
Agreements) provide that the SARs will be paid in cash on one or two fixed dates, which are
determined as certain performance conditions are met. The conditions include the Corporations
wholly owned subsidiary, The State Bank, no longer being subject to terms, conditions and
restrictions of the consent order dated December 31, 2009 (the Consent Order) and the Corporation
no longer being subject to terms, conditions and restrictions of the agreement between the
Corporation and the Federal Reserve Board, which was effective November 4, 2010 (the FRB
Agreement). The first payment date under the agreement is the latest of February 24, 2014, the
date on which the State Bank is no longer subject to the terms, conditions and restrictions of the
Consent Order, and the date on which the Corporation is no longer subject to the terms, conditions
and restrictions of the FRB Agreement. On the first SAR payment date a participant shall receive
an amount equal to the product of the number of stock appreciation rights granted and the excess of
the fair market value of one share of the Corporations common stock over $2.00. If the first SAR
payment date does not occur prior to February 24, 2016, then the SARs shall be cancelled without
any payment to the participant. If the first SAR payment date occurs prior to February 24, 2016,
then the second SAR payment date shall be February 24, 2016. On the second payment date a
participant shall receive an amount equal to the number of stock appreciation rights granted and
the excess of the fair market value of one share of the Corporations common stock on the second
SAR payment date over the value of one share of the Corporations common stock on the first SAR
payment date. If the fair market value of one share of the Corporations common stock on the
second SAR payment date does not exceed the fair market of one share of the Corporations common
stock on the first SAR payment date, then no payment shall be made to the participant on the second
SAR payment date. Generally accepted accounting principles require plans settled in cash to be
accounted for as liabilities only when the liability is probable and reasonably estimable and to be
re-measured at each reporting period. Management has determined that as of June 30, 2011, it is
not probable that the performance criteria will be met and as such no liability for the
compensatory element of the awards has been recorded in the interim consolidated financial
statements.
11
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
Operating Segments While the Corporations chief decision-makers monitor the revenue
streams of the various Corporation products and services, operations are managed and financial
performance is evaluated on a Corporate-wide basis. Accordingly, all of the Corporations financial
service operations are considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating
segment.
Reclassifications: Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to
conform to the current presentation.
NOTE 2 ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Newly Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Guidance
In April 2011, the FASB has issued ASU 2011-02, A Creditors Determination of Whether a
Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. This ASU provides guidance for companies when
determining whether a loan modification is a troubled debt restructuring. The ASU also provides
additional disclosure requirements. It is effective for public corporations for interim and annual
periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The guidance is to be applied retrospectively to
restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Corporation
is in the process of determining the impact of adoption.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing. This ASU provides guidance to
improve the accounting for repurchase agreements (repos) and other agreements that both entitle and
obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The standard
addresses the necessity and usefulness of the collateral maintenance guidance for the transferors
ability criterion when determining whether a repo should be accounted for as a sale or as a secured
borrowing. It is effective the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15,
2011. The Corporation believes the adoption of this standard will not have an impact on our
financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement. This is an amendment to ASU
2010-06, Improving Disclosure about Fair Value Measurement. This standard requires informational
disclosures on transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 instruments of the fair value hierarchy. The
standard also requires informational disclosures about the sensitivity of a fair value measurement
categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to changes in unobservable inputs and any
interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition the amended standard requires
the categorization by level of the fair value hierarchy for items that are not measured at fair
value in the statement of financial position, but for which the fair value of such items is
required to be disclosed. It is effective the first interim or annual period beginning on or after
December 15, 2011. Adoption of this standard will not have a significant impact on our financial
statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income. This standard requires that all
non-owner changes in stockholders equity be presented in a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income or in two separate consecutive statements. It is effective for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Adoption of this
standard will not have a significant impact on the display of our financial statements.
12
NOTE 3 SECURITIES
Securities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency |
|
$ |
5,991 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
6,016 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
8,899 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9,091 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations-agencies |
|
|
32,114 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
32,746 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations-private label |
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
3,510 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
2,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53,094 |
|
|
$ |
937 |
|
|
$ |
(496 |
) |
|
$ |
53,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency |
|
$ |
4,005 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
7,342 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
7,432 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations-agencies |
|
|
24,758 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
24,902 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations-private label |
|
|
4,215 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
3,871 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,975 |
|
|
$ |
439 |
|
|
$ |
(539 |
) |
|
$ |
41,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal |
|
$ |
3,648 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,648 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal |
|
$ |
4,350 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
4,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,350 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
4,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
NOTE 3 SECURITIES (continued)
Contractual maturities of securities at June 30, 2011 were as follows. Securities not due at a
single maturity date, mortgage-backed, collateralized mortgage obligations and equity securities
are shown separately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
U.S. Government and federal agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from one to five years |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,999 |
|
Due from five to ten years |
|
|
3,991 |
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
8,899 |
|
|
|
9,091 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations-agencies |
|
|
32,114 |
|
|
|
32,746 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations-private label |
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
3,510 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
2,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53,094 |
|
|
$ |
53,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
720 |
|
Due from one to five years |
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
Due from five to ten years |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,648 |
|
|
$ |
3,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011, there were 2 private label CMO securities, with aggregate holdings totaling
$3,510,000 which exceeded 10% of shareholders equity. At June 30, 2010, there were holdings
totaling $4,175,000 of private label CMO securities which exceeded 10% of shareholders equity.
Sales of available for sale securities were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
Proceeds |
|
$ |
2,024 |
|
|
$ |
6,067 |
|
Gross gains |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Gross losses |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
There was a sale of $2,024,000 of available for sale securities during the six months ended June
30, 2011. This is compared to sales totaling $6,067,000 of available for sale securities for the
six months ended June 30, 2010.
The cost basis used to determine the unrealized gains or losses of securities sold was the
amortized cost of the individual investment security as of the trade date.
14
NOTE 3 SECURITIES (continued)
Securities with unrealized losses are aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations-agencies |
|
$ |
1,902 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,902 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage obligations-private label |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired |
|
$ |
2,286 |
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
3,511 |
|
|
$ |
(429 |
) |
|
$ |
5,797 |
|
|
$ |
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
US Government and
federal agency |
|
$ |
1,989 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,989 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
State and municipal |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
2,062 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,062 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage obligations-agencies |
|
|
6,085 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6,085 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage
obligations-private
label |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,871 |
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
3,871 |
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired |
|
$ |
10,687 |
|
|
$ |
(178 |
) |
|
$ |
4,555 |
|
|
$ |
(369 |
) |
|
$ |
15,242 |
|
|
$ |
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
In evaluating OTTI, management considers the factors presented in Note 1.
As of June 30, 2011, the Corporations security portfolio consisted of 83 securities, 4 of which
were in an unrealized loss position. The majority of unrealized losses are related to the
Corporations collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and equity securities, as discussed below.
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
The decline in fair value of the Corporations private label collateralized mortgage obligations is
primarily attributable to the lack of liquidity and the financial crisis affecting these markets
and not necessarily the expected cash flows of the individual securities. The ratings held on the
private label securities are AA and A-. The underlying collateral of these CMOs is comprised
largely of 1-4 family residences. In each of these securities, the Corporation holds the senior
tranche and receives payments before other tranches. For private label securities, management
completes an analysis to review the recent performance of the mortgage pools underlying the
instruments. At June 30, 2011, the two private label securities having an amortized cost of
$3,935,000 have an unrealized loss of $425,000.
The Corporation has also been closely monitoring the performance of the CMO and MBS portfolios.
Management monitors items such as payment streams and underlying default rates, and did not
determine a severe change in these items. On a quarterly basis, management uses multiple
assumptions to project the expected future cash flows of the private label CMOs with prepayment
speeds, projected default rates
15
NOTE 3 SECURITIES (continued)
and loss severity rates. The cash flows are then discounted using the effective rate on the
securities determined at acquisition. Recent historical experience is the base for determining the
cash flow assumptions and are adjusted when appropriate after considering characteristics of the
underlying loans collateralizing the private label CMO security.
The Corporation has one agency collateralized mortgage obligation with an unrealized loss of
$4,000. The decline in value is primarily due to changes in interest rates and other market
conditions.
Equity securities
The Corporations equity investments with unrealized losses are investments in three non-public
bank holding companies in Michigan. These securities receive a multi-faceted review utilizing call
report data. Management reviews such performance indicators as earnings, ROE, ROA, non-performing
assets, brokered deposits and capital ratios. Management draws conclusions from this information,
as well as any published information or trading activity received from the individual institutions,
to assist in determining if any unrealized loss is other than temporary impairment.
Additionally management considers the length of time the investments have been at an unrealized
loss. At the end of the second quarter, management performed its review and determined that no
additional other-than-temporary impairment was necessary on the equity securities in the portfolio.
NOTE 4 LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Major categories of loans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
43,327 |
|
|
$ |
43,395 |
|
Real estate
commercial |
|
|
98,290 |
|
|
|
106,784 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
7,538 |
|
|
|
9,597 |
|
Real estate mortgage |
|
|
20,759 |
|
|
|
19,046 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
27,003 |
|
|
|
29,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,917 |
|
|
|
207,975 |
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
8,928 |
|
|
|
10,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
187,989 |
|
|
$ |
197,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation has originated primarily residential and commercial real estate loans, commercial,
construction and installment loans. The Corporation estimates that the majority of their loan
portfolio is based in Genesee, Oakland and Livingston counties within southeast Michigan with the
remainder of the portfolio distributed throughout Michigan. The ability of the Corporations
debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real estate and general economic conditions
in these areas.
Activity in the allowance for loan losses, by loan class, for the three month period ended June 30,
2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real |
|
|
Real |
|
|
Installment |
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Commercial |
|
|
Estate |
|
|
Estate |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Balance, April 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
$ |
7,136 |
|
|
$ |
397 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
9,015 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(911 |
) |
Loan recoveries |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
|
$ |
6,284 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
615 |
|
|
$ |
361 |
|
|
$ |
8,928 |
|
|
|
|
16
NOTE 4 LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (continued)
Activity in the allowance for loan losses, by loan class, for the six month period ended June 30,
2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real |
|
|
Real |
|
|
Installment |
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Commercial |
|
|
Estate |
|
|
Estate |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
7,942 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
508 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
10,027 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
1,525 |
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(2,570 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(2,870 |
) |
Loan recoveries |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
|
$ |
6,259 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
615 |
|
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
$ |
8,928 |
|
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses, for the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six |
|
|
Three |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Month |
|
|
Month |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
8,589 |
|
|
$ |
9,686 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
Loans charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
(1,571 |
) |
|
|
(1,248 |
) |
Installment |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
Home equity |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Residential real estate |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans charged off |
|
|
(2,255 |
) |
|
|
(1,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Installment |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan recoveries |
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
10,610 |
|
|
$ |
10,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
NOTE 4 LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (continued)
The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded
investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
|
|
|
|
Real |
|
|
Real |
|
|
Installment |
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
Estate |
|
|
Estate |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending allowance balance
attributable to loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for
impairment |
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
$ |
5,177 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
5,967 |
|
Collectively evaluated for
impairment |
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ending allowance balance |
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
|
$ |
6,284 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
615 |
|
|
$ |
361 |
|
|
$ |
8,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
3,092 |
|
|
$ |
21,733 |
|
|
$ |
591 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
26,181 |
|
Loans collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
40,235 |
|
|
|
84,095 |
|
|
|
20,168 |
|
|
|
7,084 |
|
|
|
19,154 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
170,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ending loans balance |
|
|
43,327 |
|
|
|
105,828 |
|
|
|
20,759 |
|
|
|
7,347 |
|
|
|
19,656 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
196,917 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recorded investment in loans |
|
$ |
43,460 |
|
|
$ |
106,208 |
|
|
$ |
20,822 |
|
|
$ |
7,389 |
|
|
$ |
19,717 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
197,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
|
|
|
|
Real |
|
|
Real |
|
|
Installment |
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
Estate |
|
|
Estate |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending allowance balance
attributable to loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for
impairment |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
5,962 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
6,488 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
1,980 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
3,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ending allowance balance |
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
7,942 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
508 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
10,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
|
$ |
25,602 |
|
|
$ |
1,069 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
28,439 |
|
Loans collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
42,212 |
|
|
|
90,779 |
|
|
|
17,977 |
|
|
|
7,798 |
|
|
|
20,770 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
179,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ending loans balance |
|
$ |
43,395 |
|
|
$ |
116,381 |
|
|
$ |
19,046 |
|
|
$ |
8,026 |
|
|
$ |
21,127 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
207,975 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recorded investment in loans |
|
$ |
43,752 |
|
|
$ |
116,810 |
|
|
$ |
19,122 |
|
|
$ |
8,081 |
|
|
$ |
21,185 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
208,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
NOTE 4 LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (continued)
The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Loan |
|
|
|
Unpaid Principal |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Losses |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Balance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Allocated |
|
|
|
|
With no related allowances recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
938 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment Loans |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Home Equity |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
With an allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
4,923 |
|
|
|
4,924 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
Other |
|
|
14,470 |
|
|
|
14,517 |
|
|
|
4,733 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,181 |
|
|
$ |
26,234 |
|
|
$ |
5,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Loan |
|
|
|
Unpaid Principal |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Losses |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Balance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Allocated |
|
|
|
|
With no related allowances recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
490 |
|
|
$ |
490 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,034 |
|
|
|
4,036 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment Loans |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Home Equity |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
With an allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Other |
|
|
21,071 |
|
|
|
21,161 |
|
|
|
5,879 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
28,439 |
|
|
$ |
28,540 |
|
|
$ |
6,488 |
|
|
|
|
19
NOTE 4 LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (continued)
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance
homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified
impaired loans.
The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual, including real estate owned in
redemption, and loans past due over 90 days still on accrual by class of loans at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Past Due |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Over 90 Days Still |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
1,810 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
4,841 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,029 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Residential real estate (1) |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,316 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Past Due |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Over 90 Days Still |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Accruing (1) |
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
1,847 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,799 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,496 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
- |
Includes accrued interest receivable of $2 |
The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of
loans at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
30-59 Days |
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
Greater than 90 |
|
|
Total Past |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Days Past Due |
|
|
Due |
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
1,948 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
1,810 |
|
|
$ |
3,776 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,221 |
|
|
|
5,230 |
|
Other |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
6,649 |
|
|
|
8,466 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
Home Equity |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,217 |
|
|
$ |
853 |
|
|
$ |
14,316 |
|
|
$ |
18,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
NOTE 4 LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
30-59 Days |
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
Greater than 90 |
|
|
Total Past |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Days Past Due |
|
|
Due |
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
|
$ |
1,470 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
4,748 |
|
|
|
4,889 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4,133 |
|
|
|
5,330 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Home Equity |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,532 |
|
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
10,816 |
|
|
$ |
12,744 |
|
|
|
|
Renegotiated loans:
Renegotiated loans totaled $4,846,000 at June 30, 2011 compared to $3,654,000 at December 31, 2010.
The Corporation allocated $308,000 and $71,000 of specific reserves to customers whose loan terms
have been modified in renegotiated loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Renegotiated
loans are also included within impaired loans. The Corporation has no additional amounts committed
to these customers.
Loans in discontinued operations:
As part of the terms of the sale of West Michigan Community Bank, certain non performing assets
were transferred to a newly formed subsidiary of the Corporation. The subsidiary acquired
$1,100,000 of substandard loans, $4,400,000 of non-accrual loans and $800,000 of real estate in
redemption. The loans and real estate owned were recorded at book value at the date of transfer.
Additionally $2,900,000 of watch credit grade loans were transferred to The State Bank. The total
of all loans transferred was $9,200,000.
Credit Quality Indicators:
The Corporation categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the
ability of borrowers to service their debts such as: current financial information, historical
payment experience; credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among
other factors. The Corporation analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit
risk. This analysis includes non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial and commercial real estate
loans. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis. The Corporation uses the following
definitions for classified risk ratings:
Watch. Loans classified as watch have a potential weakness that deserves managements
close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in
deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institutions credit
position at some future date.
Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net
worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so
classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of
the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will
sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
21
NOTE 4 LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (continued)
Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified
as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or
liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values,
highly questionable and improbable. The Corporation does not classify loans as doubtful.
Loans that approach this status are charged-off.
Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described
process are considered to be prime or pass rated loans. Based on the most recent analysis
performed, the recorded investment by risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Prime |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Watch |
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
Total |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
5,335 |
|
|
$ |
33,554 |
|
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
|
$ |
3,100 |
|
|
$ |
43,460 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
5,873 |
|
|
|
7,821 |
|
Other |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
76,532 |
|
|
|
5,941 |
|
|
|
15,913 |
|
|
|
98,387 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,335 |
|
|
$ |
110,859 |
|
|
$ |
8,587 |
|
|
$ |
24,887 |
|
|
$ |
149,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Prime |
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Watch |
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
Total |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
3,174 |
|
|
$ |
33,871 |
|
|
$ |
3,530 |
|
|
$ |
3,177 |
|
|
$ |
43,752 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
6,979 |
|
|
|
9,148 |
|
Other |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
81,739 |
|
|
|
9,863 |
|
|
|
16,060 |
|
|
|
107,662 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,174 |
|
|
$ |
116,365 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
|
$ |
26,216 |
|
|
$ |
160,562 |
|
|
|
|
The Corporation considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for
loan losses. For residential and consumer loan classes, the Corporation also evaluates credit
quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by payment
activity. The following table presents the recorded investment in residential and consumer loans
based on payment activity as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Consumer |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Home Equity |
|
|
Installment |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Total |
|
Performing |
|
$ |
19,213 |
|
|
$ |
7,127 |
|
|
$ |
20,231 |
|
|
$ |
46,571 |
|
Non-performing |
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
19,717 |
|
|
$ |
7,389 |
|
|
$ |
20,822 |
|
|
$ |
47,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Consumer |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Home Equity |
|
|
Installment |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Total |
|
Performing |
|
$ |
21,128 |
|
|
$ |
7,553 |
|
|
$ |
18,053 |
|
|
$ |
46,734 |
|
Non-performing |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,185 |
|
|
$ |
8,081 |
|
|
$ |
19,122 |
|
|
$ |
48,388 |
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a
liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels
of inputs that may be used to measure fair values.
22
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets
that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entitys own assumptions
about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on
nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a
mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying
exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities
relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). The remaining fair values of
securities (Level 3 inputs) are based on the reporting entitys own assumptions and basic knowledge
of market conditions and individual investment performance. The Corporation reviews the
performance of the securities that comprise Level 3 on a quarterly basis.
Impaired Loans: The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance
for loan losses is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize
a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the
income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to
adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments
are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for
determining fair value.
Other Real Estate Owned: Non-recurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential
real estate properties classified as other real estate owned are measured at the lower of carrying
amount or fair value, less costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third party
appraisals of the property, resulting in a Level 3 classification. In cases where the carrying
amount exceeds the fair value, less costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government and federal agency |
|
$ |
6,016 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
6,016 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
9,091 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9,091 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations-agency |
|
|
32,746 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
32,746 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations-private label |
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,172 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53,535 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
52,393 |
|
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government and federal agency |
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
7,432 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,432 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations-agency |
|
|
24,902 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
24,902 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations-private label |
|
|
3,871 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,871 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,875 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
40,728 |
|
|
$ |
1,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2010, $1,445,000 of equity securities were transferred from Level 2 to
Level 3 due to no observable trades which resulted in and a change in valuation methodology.
The table below presents a reconciliation including the respective income statement classification
of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Beginning balance, January 1, |
|
$ |
1,147 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
Total gains or losses (realized / unrealized) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on security impairment |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(356 |
) |
Transfer in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, June 30, |
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
Assets Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
At June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
7,450 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,450 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
8,399 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
8,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other real estate owned |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
599 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
599 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
7,066 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,066 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
8,736 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
8,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other real estate owned |
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following represent impairment charges recognized during the period:
At June 30, 2011, impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the
collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a principal amount of $11,244,000 with a valuation
allowance of $2,845,000. This resulted in an additional provision for loan losses of $604,000 for
the three month period and $800,000 for the six month period ending June 30, 2011 This is compared
to December 31, 2010 when the principal amount of impaired loans was $12,500,000 with a valuation
allowance of $3,764,000.
Other real estate owned which is measured at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs
to sell, had a net carrying amount of $1,854,000, of which $96,000 was at fair value at June 30,
2011, resulting from write-downs totaling $33,000 for the three month period and $68,000 for the
six month period. At December 31, 2010, other real estate owned had a net carrying amount of
$2,742,000, of which $295,000 was at fair value.
25
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
Carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments, not previously presented were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
27,481 |
|
|
$ |
27,481 |
|
|
$ |
33,492 |
|
|
$ |
33,492 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
3,648 |
|
|
|
3,726 |
|
|
|
4,350 |
|
|
|
4,383 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Net loans (including impaired loans) |
|
|
187,989 |
|
|
|
184,878 |
|
|
|
197,948 |
|
|
|
194,925 |
|
FHLB stock |
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
268,112 |
|
|
$ |
268,226 |
|
|
$ |
275,977 |
|
|
$ |
272,223 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
12,614 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
12,613 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value
disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and
short-term instruments approximate their fair values.
Securities: Fair values for securities held to maturity are based on similar information
previously presented for securities available for sale.
FHLB Stock: It was not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to
restrictions placed on its transferability.
Loans held for sale: The fair values of these loans are determined in the aggregate on the
basis of existing forward commitments or fair values attributable to similar loans.
Loans: For variable rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant
change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value for other loans is
estimated using discounted cash flow analysis. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable
approximates its fair value.
Off-balance-sheet instruments: The fair value of off-balance sheet items is not considered
material.
Deposit
liabilities: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition equal
to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The carrying amounts for variable rate,
fixed term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the
reporting date. Fair values for fixed certificates of deposit are estimated using discounted cash
flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on similar certificates. The
carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased and other short-term
borrowings approximate their fair values.
26
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
FHLB advances: Rates currently available for FHLB debt with similar terms and remaining
maturities are used to estimate the fair value of the existing debt.
Subordinated Debentures: The estimated fair value of the existing subordinated debentures
is calculated by comparing a current market rate for the instrument compared to the book rate. The
difference between these rates computes the fair value.
Limitations: Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on
relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not
reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the
Corporations entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a
significant portion of the Corporations financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on
managements judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk
characteristics and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve
uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with
precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
NOTE 6 INCOME TAXES
A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely
than not that all or part of the benefit related to such assets will not be realized. Management
has reviewed the deferred tax position for the Corporation at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
The Corporations evaluation of taxable events, losses in recent years and the continuing
deterioration of the Michigan economy led management to conclude that it was more likely than not
that the benefit would not be realized. As a result, the Corporation maintained a full valuation
allowance at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
An income tax benefit associated with continuing operations in the amount of $368,000 was recorded
for the period ending June 30, 2011 and an income tax expense in the amount of $107,000 was
recorded for the period ending June 30, 2010. The amount recorded considers the results of current
period adjustments to other comprehensive income and discontinued operations. Generally, the
calculation for income tax expense (benefit) does not consider the tax effects of changes in other
comprehensive income or loss, which is a component of shareholders equity on the balance sheet.
However, an exception is provided in certain circumstances when there is a pre-tax loss from
continuing operations and income from other categories such as other comprehensive income or
discontinued operations. In such case, pre-tax income from other categories is included in the tax
expense (benefit) calculation for the current period.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010, and the Corporation
does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in the next
twelve months. The Corporation and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S federal income taxes as well
as income tax of the state of Michigan. The Corporation is no longer subject to examination by
taxing authorities for years before 2007.
NOTE 7 EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the computation of basic earnings per
common share and diluted earnings per common share is presented below. Earnings per common share
are presented below for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
27
NOTE 7 EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE (continued)
The factors in the earnings per share computation follow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(000s omitted except share and per share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(245 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,780 |
) |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
(3,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
2,320,920 |
|
|
|
2,268,791 |
|
|
|
2,315,446 |
|
|
|
2,259,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) income per common share |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(1.44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(245 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,780 |
) |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
(3,263 |
) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding for
basic earnings per common share |
|
|
2,320,920 |
|
|
|
2,268,791 |
|
|
|
2,315,446 |
|
|
|
2,259,406 |
|
Add: Dilutive effects of assumed exercises of stock
options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares and dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
2,320,920 |
|
|
|
2,268,791 |
|
|
|
2,315,446 |
|
|
|
2,259,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(1.44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The factors in the earnings per share of continuing operations follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(000s omitted except share and per share data) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss of continuing operations |
|
$ |
(136 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(284 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,551 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
2,320,920 |
|
|
|
2,268,791 |
|
|
|
2,315,446 |
|
|
|
2,259,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.99 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss of continuing operations |
|
$ |
(136 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(284 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,551 |
) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding
for basic earnings per common share |
|
|
2,320,920 |
|
|
|
2,268,791 |
|
|
|
2,315,446 |
|
|
|
2,259,406 |
|
Add: Dilutive effects of assumed exercises of
Stock options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares and dilutive potential |
|
|
2,320,920 |
|
|
|
2,268,791 |
|
|
|
2,315,446 |
|
|
|
2,259,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.99 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options of 16,634 and 16,755 shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 2011 and June 30,
2010, respectively were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for 2011 and
2010, because they were antidilutive.
NOTE 8 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
There are various contingent liabilities that are not reflected in the financial statements
including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of
management, after
consultation with legal counsel, there are no matters which are expected to have a material effect
on the Corporations consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
28
NOTE 9 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On April 28, 2010, at the Annual Shareholder Meeting, a formal announcement was made regarding the
signing of a definitive agreement to sell West Michigan Community Bank. The transaction was
consummated on January 31, 2011, and the Corporation received $10,500,000 from the sale of West
Michigan Community Bank (a 10% premium to book). As a condition of the sale, the Corporation
assumed certain non-performing assets of West Michigan Community Bank which totaled $9,900,000.
The assets are housed in a newly formed real estate holding company subsidiary of the Corporation.
In addition, The State Bank assumed $2,900,000 of watch rated credits.
A condensed balance sheet of discontinued operations, at June 30, 2011, is presented below.
LOANS AND OTHER REAL ESTATE ASSUMED
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
301 |
|
Loans |
|
|
7,350 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
1,246 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
23 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
As discussed above West Michigan Community Bank was sold to a third party investor group as of
January 31, 2011. As a result there is no balance sheet presentation at June 30, 2011. A condensed
balance sheet of discontinued operations is presented below at December 31, 2010.
WEST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY BANK
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
8,309 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
15,080 |
|
Loans, net of allowance of $3,543 |
|
|
86,353 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
13,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
122,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
13,751 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
93,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
107,297 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Accrued taxes, interest and other liabilities |
|
|
1,024 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
9,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
122,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
29
NOTE 9 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (continued)
A condensed statement of income of discontinued operations related to loans and other real estate
assumed upon the sale of West Michigan Community Bank is presented for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2011. Due to the transfer of loans at January 31, 2011, only five months of
income and expense are presented in the six month period.
LOANS AND OTHER REAL ESTATE ASSUMED
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME (LOSS) OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Unaudited
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
|
Loss before federal income tax |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
Federal income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(109 |
) |
|
$ |
(225 |
) |
|
|
|
Due to the sale of West Michigan Community Bank on January 31, 2011, the six months ended June
30, 2011 income statement represents a one month period. There is no income statement presentation
for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
WEST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY BANK
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME (LOSS) OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Unaudited
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
1,755 |
|
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
3,551 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
Provision for loan loss |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan loss |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
2,463 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before federal income tax |
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
|
|
|
Federal income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(426 |
) |
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
(1,084 |
) |
|
|
|
In March 2009, the Corporation entered into an agreement to sell all of the stock of one of
its bank subsidiaries, Davison State Bank, to a private, non-affiliated, investor group. As of
April 30, 2010, Davison State Bank was sold to an independent financial group. As a result, there
is no balance sheet for presentation at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
30
NOTE 9 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (continued)
A condensed statement of income of discontinued operations is presented for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2010. Due to the sale of Davison State Bank, there is no income statement
for presentation for the three or six month periods ended June 30, 2011.
DAVISON STATE BANK
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME (LOSS) OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before federal income tax |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
553 |
|
Federal income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(115 |
) |
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation reversed a previously recorded gross
estimated loss of $700,000 related to the sale of Davison State Bank.
TOTAL DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME (LOSS) OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Unaudited
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Period Ended |
|
|
Six Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
1,905 |
|
|
$ |
569 |
|
|
$ |
4,158 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
1,820 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
|
Loss before federal income tax |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(1,158 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(1,093 |
) |
Federal income benefit |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(109 |
) |
|
$ |
(541 |
) |
|
$ |
(120 |
) |
|
$ |
(712 |
) |
|
|
|
In connection with the sale of West Michigan Community Bank, during the first quarter the
Corporation recognized a gross gain of $711,000. Net of tax, the gain amounted to $469,000.
31
NOTE 10-REGULATORY MATTERS
The Corporation (on a consolidated basis) and its Bank subsidiaries are subject to various
regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal and state regulatory agencies. Failure
to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional
discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on
the Corporation. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, the Corporation and the Banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items that are
calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classifications are also
subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other
factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require FDIC insured
Banks to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1
capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital
(as defined) to average assets (as defined). As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the most
recent notifications from Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the subsidiary Bank as
adequately capitalized in accordance with standards.
As of December 31, 2010, West Michigan Community Bank had a Tier 1 capital to average assets
ratio of 7.5%. West Michigan Community Bank was placed under a Consent Order with federal and state
banking regulators containing provisions to foster improvement in West Michigan Community Banks
earnings, reduce non performing loan levels, and increase capital. The Consent Order required West
Michigan Community Bank to retain a Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio of a minimum of
8.0%.West Michigan Community Bank was not in compliance with the Consent Order requirements at
December 31, 2010. As previously mentioned, West Michigan Community Bank was sold on January 31,
2011; therefore the Consent Order is no longer applicable to the Corporation.
In January 2010, The State Bank entered into a Consent Order with federal and state banking
regulators containing provisions to foster improvement in The State Banks earnings, reduce
nonperforming loan levels, increase capital, and require revisions to various policies. The Consent
Order requires The State Bank to maintain a Tier 1 capital to average asset ratio of a minimum of
8.0%. It also requires The State Bank to maintain a total capital to risk weighted asset ratio of
12.0%. At June 30, 2011, The State Bank had a Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio of 7.9% and a
total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 12.4%. The State Bank is not in compliance with all
Consent Order requirements, and therefore cannot be considered well capitalized.
The Consent Order restricts the Bank from issuing or renewing brokered deposits. The Consent Order
also restricts dividend payments from The State Bank to the Corporation. The Corporation, the Board
of Directors and management continue to work on plans to come into compliance with the Consent
Order. Recent actions included the injection of capital into The State Bank resulting from the sale
of West Michigan Community Bank. On January 31, 2011, $900,000 of capital was injected into The
State Bank. On June 2, 2011, $2,862,000 of additional capital was injected into The State Bank.
Future capital injections are anticipated following the sale of additional non-performing assets
acquired by the newly formed subsidiary of the Corporation. It is anticipated that an additional
$850,000 of capital may be injected into to The State Bank in July 2011, following the sale of
non-performing assets from the subsidiary of the Corporation. While below the compliance level
required by the Order, the Bank maintains capital levels that would be considered adequately
capitalized by regulatory standards. Non-compliance with Consent Order requirements may cause the
bank to be subject to further enforcement actions by the FDIC.
In October 2010, the Corporation received a notice from The Federal Reserve which defined
restrictions being placed upon the holding company. The restrictions include the declaration or
payment
32
NOTE 10-REGULATORY MATTERS (continued)
of any dividends, the receipt of dividends from subsidiary banks, the repayment of any principal or
interest on subordinated debentures or Trust Preferred securities, restrictions on debt, any
changes in
Executive or Senior Management or change in the role of Senior Management. In addition, the notice
provided an expectation that the Corporation maintain sufficient capital levels.
As illustrated in the table below, at June 30, 2011, the Consolidated Corporations total capital
to risk weighted assets ratio indicates that it is adequately capitalized. The Corporations total
capital to risk weighted assets ratio of 10.8% at June 30, 2011 was above the minimum requirement
to be adequately capitalized of 8.0%. This is compared to December 31, 2010 when the total capital
to risk weighted assets for the Corporation was at 7.8% and was under capitalized. The improvement
in capital ratios was largely driven by the sale of West Michigan Community Bank and the recapture
of capital related to the sale. Despite the improvements and current capital levels, the
Corporation continues to be required to obtain written approval prior to payments of any dividends
or for any increase or decrease to outstanding debt.
The Corporations principal source of funds for dividend payments is dividends received from the
Bank. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid without prior approval of
regulatory agencies. Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any
calendar year is limited to the current years net profits, combined with the retained net profits
of the preceding two years, subject to the limitations described above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
|
Regulatory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy |
|
|
Agreement |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Purposes |
|
|
Requirements |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
As of June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated |
|
$ |
24,515 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
$ |
18,137 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
NA |
|
NA |
The State Bank |
|
|
26,433 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
17,079 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
21,348 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
Tier 1 Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated |
|
|
21,681 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
9,068 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
The State Bank |
|
|
23,673 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
8,539 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
Tier 1 Capital
(to Average Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
21,681 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
12,085 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
The State Bank |
|
|
23,673 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
11,921 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
23,843 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
33
NOTE 10-REGULATORY MATTERS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
|
Regulatory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy |
|
|
Agreement |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Purposes |
|
|
Requirements |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
25,443 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
$ |
26,073 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
NA |
|
NA |
The State Bank |
|
|
22,670 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
18,152 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
27,228 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
West Michigan Community
Bank |
|
|
10,722 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
7,794 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
21,261 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
13,036 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
The State Bank |
|
|
19,735 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
9,076 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
West Michigan Community
Bank |
|
|
9,475 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital
(to Average Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
21,261 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
17,330 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
The State Bank |
|
|
19,735 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
12,204 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
24,408 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
West Michigan Community
Bank |
|
|
9,475 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
5,025 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
10,050 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Certain of the Corporations accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the
Corporations financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or
subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates
associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts
and circumstances. Facts and circumstances, which could affect these judgments, include, but
without limitation, changes in interest rates, in the performance of the economy or in the
financial condition of borrowers.
Results
of Operations
As indicated in the income statement, the income for the first six months ended June 30, 2011 was
$65,000 compared to a loss of $3,263,000 for the same period in 2010. Net interest income in the
second quarter of 2011, was $218,000 below net interest income for the same quarter in 2010. The
second quarter 2011 provision for loan losses was reduced to $730,000 compared to $2,449,000 for
the second quarter of 2010. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the provision for loan
losses was $1,525,000 compared to $3,584,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2010.
Management feels the allowance for loan losses is appropriate and has decreased from $10,027,000 at
December 31, 2010 to $8,928,000 at June 30, 2011 or a decrease of $1,099,000.
The banking industry uses standard performance indicators to help evaluate a banking institutions
performance. Return on average assets is one of these indicators. For the three months ended June
30, 2011, the Corporations return on average assets (annualized) was (0.08%) compared to (0.58%)
for the same period in 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Corporations return on
average equity (annualized) was 0.02% compared to (0.66%) for the same period in 2010. Net loss per
share, basic and diluted, was $0.11 in the second quarter 2011 compared to ($1.22) net loss per
share basic and diluted for the same period in 2010. Net income per share, basic and diluted, was
$0.03 in the six month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to ($1.44) net loss per share basic and
diluted for the same period in 2010.
34
Net Interest Income
Net interest income and average balances and yields on major categories of interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized in
Table 2. Net interest income and average balances and yields on major categories of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010 are summarized in Table 3. The effects of changes in average interest rates and average
balances are detailed in Table 1 below.
Table 1 below displays the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the
six month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2010. The
information displayed is with respect to the effects on interest income and interest expense
attributable to changes in volume and rate.
As indicated in Table 1, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, net interest income decreased
compared to the same period in 2010. The volume of loans decreased over the past year, along with a
proportionate decrease in interest income. The mix of this change resulted in a decrease in loan
yield. To mitigate the decrease in interest income, deposit rates and volumes decreased year over
year. The deposit interest rate reduction was achieved by a reduction of offering rates on time
deposits, which assisted in discouraging high rate instruments from renewing, with some funds
exiting, thus reducing interest bearing liability costs.
Table 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JUNE 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 COMPARED TO 2010 |
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DUE TO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
VOLUME |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
Taxable securities |
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
(119 |
) |
|
$ |
174 |
|
Tax-exempt securities (1) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Total loans (1) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(1,269 |
) |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
(899 |
) |
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Savings deposits |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Time CDs $100,000 and over |
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(495 |
) |
Other time deposits |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(281 |
) |
Other borrowings |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(816 |
) |
|
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
$ |
(364 |
) |
|
$ |
(90 |
) |
|
$ |
(454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 34%. |
As indicated in Table 2, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Corporations net
interest margin (with consideration of full tax equivalency) was 3.76% compared with 3.79% for the
same period in 2010. The decrease in net interest margin is the result of decreasing security
portfolio yields as market rates change and decreased volume and rates in the loan portfolios.
Management partially mitigated the reduction in the earning asset yields by reducing pricing on
interest bearing liabilities. Liquid funds were immediately re-priced, while time deposits were
re-priced as they matured, when comparing the period ended June 30, 2011 to the period ended June
30, 2010.
Average earning assets decreased 7.5% or $21,749,000 comparing the six months of 2011 to the same
time period in 2010. Loans, the highest yielding component of earning assets, represented 75.1% of
35
earning assets in 2011 compared to 81.2% in 2010. Average interest bearing liabilities decreased
11.4%
or $29,529,000 comparing the first six months of 2011 to the same time period in 2010. Non-interest
bearing deposits amounted to 21.8% of average earning assets in the first six months of 2011
compared with 18.7% in the same time period of 2010.
Net interest income (displayed with consideration of full tax equivalency), average balance sheet
amounts, and the corresponding yields for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are shown
in Table 3. Net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $2,484,000, a decrease
of $247,000, or 9.1%, from the same period in 2010. Net interest margin decreased as a result of
decreases in investment portfolio yields and loan portfolio yields, offset by continuing downward
re-pricing of interest bearing liabilities.
Management reviews economic forecasts and statistics on a monthly basis. Accordingly, the
Corporation will continue to strategically manage the balance sheet structure in an effort to
optimize net interest income. The Corporation expects to continue to selectively seek out new loan
opportunities while continuing to maintain sound credit quality.
Management continually monitors the Corporations balance sheet in an effort to insulate net
interest income from significant swings caused by interest rate volatility. If market rates change
in 2011, corresponding changes in funding costs will be considered to avoid the potential negative
impact on net interest income. The Corporations policies in this regard are further discussed in
the section titled Interest Rate Sensitivity Management.
36
Table 2 Average Balance and Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
INCOME/ |
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
INCOME/ |
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
(000s omitted)(Annualized) |
|
BALANCE |
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
BALANCE |
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies |
|
$ |
44,650 |
|
|
$ |
594 |
|
|
|
2.68 |
% |
|
$ |
24,389 |
|
|
$ |
427 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
% |
State and Political (1) |
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
6.20 |
% |
|
|
10,217 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
% |
Other |
|
|
2,846 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities |
|
|
51,626 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
36,936 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
% |
Fed Funds Sold |
|
|
15,457 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
17,727 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
152,546 |
|
|
|
4,430 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
% |
|
|
179,684 |
|
|
|
5,466 |
|
|
|
6.13 |
% |
Tax Free (1) |
|
|
1,898 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
6.59 |
% |
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
% |
Real Estate-Mortgage |
|
|
19,499 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
|
22,481 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
27,853 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
% |
|
|
31,326 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
5.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
201,796 |
|
|
|
5,868 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
% |
|
|
235,816 |
|
|
|
7,137 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
% |
Allowance for Loan Losses |
|
|
(9,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
|
192,151 |
|
|
|
5,868 |
|
|
|
6.16 |
% |
|
|
226,466 |
|
|
|
7,137 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Held for Sale |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EARNING ASSETS |
|
$ |
269,422 |
|
|
|
6,648 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
% |
|
$ |
291,171 |
|
|
$ |
7,918 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Due from Banks |
|
|
21,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of Discontinued Operations |
|
|
20,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Assets |
|
|
26,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
327,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
495,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing DDA |
|
$ |
47,044 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
$ |
49,186 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
% |
Savings Deposits |
|
|
68,128 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
63,185 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
Time CDs $100,000 and Over |
|
|
43,858 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
67,229 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
Other Time CDs |
|
|
56,005 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
% |
|
|
65,069 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
215,035 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
244,669 |
|
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
% |
Other Borrowings |
|
|
15,410 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
% |
|
|
15,305 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
3.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES |
|
$ |
230,445 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
$ |
259,974 |
|
|
|
2,444 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest bearing DDA |
|
|
58,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of Discontinued Operations |
|
|
18,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Liabilities |
|
|
3,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
16,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
327,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
495,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Rate Spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income /Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,020 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,474 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 34%. |
37
Table 3 Average Balance and Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
INCOME/ |
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
INCOME/ |
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
(000s omitted)(Annualized) |
|
BALANCE |
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
BALANCE |
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies |
|
$ |
44,035 |
|
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
$ |
23,214 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
|
3.63 |
% |
State and Political (1) |
|
|
3,912 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
% |
|
|
9,162 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
% |
Other |
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2.03 |
% |
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities |
|
|
50,520 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
|
34,706 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
% |
Fed Funds Sold |
|
|
8,253 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
21,127 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
132,461 |
|
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
% |
|
|
176,626 |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
6.12 |
% |
Tax Free (1) |
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
% |
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
% |
Real Estate-Mortgage |
|
|
18,654 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
% |
|
|
21,782 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
6.54 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
24,026 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
6.56 |
% |
|
|
30,756 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
176,936 |
|
|
|
2,848 |
|
|
|
6.46 |
% |
|
|
231,429 |
|
|
|
3,540 |
|
|
|
6.14 |
% |
Allowance for Loan Losses |
|
|
(9,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,742 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
|
167,772 |
|
|
|
2,848 |
|
|
|
6.81 |
% |
|
|
221,687 |
|
|
|
3,540 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Held for Sale |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EARNING ASSETS |
|
$ |
236,159 |
|
|
|
3,264 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
% |
|
$ |
288,070 |
|
|
$ |
3,915 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Due from Banks |
|
|
17,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of Discontinued Operations |
|
|
40,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Assets |
|
|
21,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
306,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
477,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing DDA |
|
$ |
34,877 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
$ |
47,061 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
% |
Savings Deposits |
|
|
64,996 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
64,257 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
Time CDs $100,000 and Over |
|
|
34,391 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
4.54 |
% |
|
|
63,329 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
% |
Other Time CDs |
|
|
45,906 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
% |
|
|
64,522 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
180,170 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
239,169 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
1.77 |
% |
Other Borrowings |
|
|
15,464 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
15,279 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
3.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES |
|
$ |
195,634 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
$ |
254,448 |
|
|
$ |
1,184 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest bearing DDA |
|
|
55,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of Discontinued Operations |
|
|
34,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Liabilities |
|
|
2,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
17,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
306,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
477,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Rate Spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income /Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,484 |
|
|
|
4.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,731 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 34%. |
38
Allowance
and Provision For Loan Losses
The Corporation maintains formal policies and procedures to control and monitor credit risk.
Management believes the allowance for loan losses is appropriate to provide for probable incurred
losses in the loan portfolio. While the Corporations loan portfolio has no significant
concentrations in any one industry or any exposure in foreign loans, the loan portfolio has a
concentration connected with commercial real estate loans. Specific strategies have been deployed
to reduce the concentration levels and limit exposure to this type of lending in the future. The
Michigan economy, employment levels and other economic conditions in the Corporations local
markets may have a significant impact on the level of credit losses. Management continues to
identify and devote attention to credits that are not performing as agreed. Of course,
deterioration of economic conditions could have an impact on the Corporations credit quality,
which could impact the need for greater provision for loan losses and the level of the allowance
for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans. Non-performing loans are discussed further in the
section titled Non-Performing Assets.
The allowance for loan losses reflects managements judgment as to the level considered appropriate
to absorb future losses in the loan portfolio. The Corporations methodology in determining the
appropriateness of the allowance is based on ongoing quarterly assessments and relies on several
key elements, which include specific allowances for identified problem loans and a formula-based
risk-allocated allowance for the remainder of the portfolio. This includes a review of individual
loans, size, and composition of the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, current economic
conditions, financial condition of borrowers, the level and composition of non-performing loans,
portfolio trends, estimated net charge-offs and other pertinent factors. While we consider the
allowance for loan losses to be adequate based on information currently available, future
adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions, delinquencies,
or loss rates. Although portions of the allowance have been allocated to various portfolio
segments, the allowance is general in nature and is available for the portfolio in its entirety.
While the provision for loan losses has decreased substantially, the funds provided remains
historically high as a result of continued weaknesses in the national and local economies, elevated
amounts of non-performing loans and elevated charge-off levels over the past three years. Rolling
twelve quarter periods of historical charge off experience is considered when calculating the
current required level of the allowance for loan losses. The amount of the allowance for loan
losses specifically allocated to impaired loans decreased by $521,000 during the first six months
of 2011 as a result of charge offs incurred on loans for which specific allocations were previously
recorded.
At June 30, 2011, the allowance was $8,928,000, or 4.47% of total loans compared to $10,027,000, or
4.82%, at December 31, 2010, a decrease of $1,099,000 during the first six months of 2011. Non
performing loan levels, discussed later, increased during the period As discussed above, a
majority of the charge-offs relate to loans for which specific allocations were recorded at
December 31, 2010.
Table 4 below summarizes loan losses and recoveries for the first six months of 2011 and 2010.
During the first six months of 2011, the Corporation experienced net charge-offs of $2,624,000 or
1.31% of gross loans compared with net charge-offs of $1,563,000 or 0.68% of gross loans in the
first six months of 2010. The provision for loan losses was $1,525,000 in the first six months of
2011 and $3,584,000 for the same time period in 2010. Fewer loans migrating to watch status due to
economic conditions, have contributed to a lower level of provision for loan losses. While there
are indications that asset quality is improving, uncertain current economic conditions justify the
use of historic loss rates in estimating the required level of allowance for loan losses.
39
Table 4 Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period |
|
$ |
10,027 |
|
|
$ |
8,589 |
|
|
|
|
Charge-Offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, Financial and Agriculture |
|
|
(2,704 |
) |
|
|
(1,840 |
) |
Real Estate-Mortgage |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
Installment Loans to Individuals |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Charge-Offs |
|
|
(2,870 |
) |
|
|
(2,255 |
) |
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, Financial and Agriculture |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
Real Estate-Mortgage |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Installment Loans to Individuals |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
Total Recoveries |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-Offs |
|
|
(2,624 |
) |
|
|
(1,563 |
) |
Provision |
|
|
1,525 |
|
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period |
|
$ |
8,928 |
|
|
$ |
10,610 |
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Net Charge-Offs to Gross Loans |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
0.68 |
% |
Non-Interest
Income
Non-interest income decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same
period in 2010. Overall non-interest income was $954,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011
compared to $1,336,000 for the same period in 2010. This represents a decrease of 28.6%. On a year
to date basis, non-interest income at June 30, 2011 was $2,108,000 compared with $2,451,000 at June
30, 2010; a decrease of 14.0%.
Service charges on deposit accounts are approximately 30.4% of non-interest income for the three
months ended June 30, 2011. These fees from continuing operations were $290,000 in the second
quarter of 2011, compared to $359,000 for the same period of 2010. The decrease is a result of a
28.9% decrease in NSF charges collected. On a year to date basis, service charges on deposit
accounts, decreased 25.3% to $586,000 at June 30, 2011.
Gain on the sale of mortgage loans originated by the Bank and sold into the secondary market
decreased by $92,000 or 74.8% to $31,000 in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $123,000 for the
same period in 2010. Management believes for the remainder of 2011, mortgage income will remain
relatively flat as governmental purchase incentives have expired and property values remain under
stress. On a year to date basis, the gain on the sale of mortgage loans has decreased 51.5% when
compared to the first six months of 2010.
Trust, investment and financial planning services income increased $36,000 or 18.6% in the second
quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase is attributable to
increases in the utilization of variable rate annuity products by clients. On a year to date basis,
trust and wealth management income has increased 11.9% compared to 2010.
Other operating income, including gain on sale of securities, decreased by $257,000 or 39.0%
in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the same time period in 2010. The decreases consist of
decreased interchange income from debit cards, a decrease in gain on sale of real estate owned,
decreases in charges related to providing support services to other banks and the non-recurrence of
gain on sale of securities which had occurred in the second quarter of 2010. On a year to date
basis, other operating income decreased $95,000 or 9.5%. The reduction was mainly due to decreases
in charges related to providing support services to other banks. This was partially offset by
increases in debit card income.
40
Non-Interest Expense
Total non-interest expense decreased 12.1% to $2,970,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2011,
compared with $3,377,000 in the same period of 2010. The decrease is attributable to decreases in
loan and collection expenses, occupancy expenses related to property taxes, decreased depreciation
and amortization and FDIC assessments. These were partially offset by increases, due to
adjustments, in accrual of state business tax. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, total
non-interest expense from continued operations decreased $464,000. The decrease was composed mainly
of decreases in occupancy expenses related to property taxes, required FDIC assessments, loan
expenses, and depreciation and amortization. These were partially offset by increases in salary
and benefit costs, building repairs and maintenance, and accrual of state business tax.
Salary and benefit costs, the Corporations largest non-interest expense category, were $1,623,000
in the second quarter of 2011, compared with $1,595,000, or a slight increase of 1.8% for the same
time period in 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, salary and benefit costs were
$3,296,000, compared with $3,214,000 for the same time period in 2010. This increase of 2.6% or
$82,000 was related to higher salary expense related to commission payments and higher payroll
taxes as the unemployment expense rate returned to prior year levels.
Occupancy expenses, at $276,000, were reduced in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to
the same period in 2010 with a decrease of $35,000 or 11.3%. Decreases of occupancy expenses were
mainly related to property taxes. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, occupancy expenses
were $560,000, compared to $632,000 for the same time period in 2010. This represents a decrease of
11.4%. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the decrease in occupancy expenses is related
to reductions in property tax expense, which were partially offset by increases in building repairs
and maintenance.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, furniture and equipment expenses were $278,000
compared to $322,000 for the same period in 2010, a decrease of 13.7%. The decrease was due to
lower depreciation expense in the second quarter of 2011. Also, equipment rental expense dropped
over 20.2% for the year-over-year quarter. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, furniture
and equipment expenses were $570,000 compared to $628,000 for the same period in 2010. This
represents a decrease of 9.2% for the six month period comparison and is mainly related to
decreases in depreciation expense.
Loan and collection expenses, at $85,000, were down $187,000 or 68.8% during the three months ended
June 30, 2011 compared to the same time period in 2010. The decrease was related to lower write
downs of other real estate owned; lower expenses related to other real estate owned, in the form of
property taxes and property maintenance and expenses related to troubled loans. For the six month
period ended June 30, 2011, loan and collection expenses totaled $195,000 compared to $645,000 for
the same period in 2010. This represents a decrease of 69.8%. The decrease during the six month
period was also related to decreases in other real estate owned expenses.
Advertising expenses increased $3,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same
period in 2010. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, advertising expenses were $44,000
compared to $41,000 for the same period in 2010. This is an increase of 7.3%. The Corporation has
slightly increased advertising expenses as the bank returns to advertising campaigns that had been
previously suspended. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, advertising expenses totaled
$63,000, compared to $67,000 for the same time in 2010. This is a decrease of 6.0%.
Other operating expenses, from continued operations, were $664,000 in the three months ended June
30, 2011 compared to $836,000 in the same time period in 2010, a decrease of $172,000 or 20.6%.
Increases year over year include increases in communication costs, provision for state business
taxes, and our general insurances. Largely offsetting these increases was a reduction in FDIC
assessment expense. In the six months ended June 30, 2011, other operating expenses, from continued
operations, were $1,507,000 compared to $1,469,000 in the same time period in 2010, an increase of
$38,000 or 2.6%.
41
Increases year over year include increases in communication costs, provision for state business
taxes, and our general insurances. Largely offsetting these increases was a reduction in FDIC
assessment expense.
Financial Condition
Proper management of the volume and composition of the Corporations earning assets and funding
sources is essential for ensuring strong and consistent earnings performance, maintaining adequate
liquidity and limiting exposure to risks caused by changing market conditions. The Corporations
securities portfolio is structured to provide a source of liquidity through maturities and to
generate an income stream with relatively low levels of principal risk. The Corporation does not
engage in securities trading. Loans comprise the largest component of earning assets and are the
Corporations highest yielding assets. Customer deposits are the primary source of funding for
earning assets while short-term debt and other sources of funds could be further utilized if market
conditions and liquidity needs change.
The Corporations total assets were $303,333,000 at June 30, 2011 compared to total assets of
$424,228,000 at December 31, 2010. This includes assets from discontinued operations of $9,011,000
at June 30, 2011 compared to $122,968,000 at December 31, 2010. Loans comprised 64.9% of total
assets at June 30, 2011 compared to 49.0% at December 31, 2010. Loans decreased $11,058,000 during
the first six months of 2011.
Bank premises and equipment decreased $109,000 to $10,226,000 at June 30, 2011 compared to
$10,335,000 at December 31, 2010. The decrease was a result of normal depreciation.
Other assets decreased $913,000 when comparing June 30, 2011 to December 31, 2010. The decrease is
mainly attributable to a decrease in other real estate owned.
On the liability side of the balance sheet, the ratio of non-interest bearing deposits to total
deposits was 23.8% at June 30, 2011 and 19.9% at December 31, 2010. Interest bearing deposit
liabilities totaled $204,295,000 at June 30, 2011 compared to $220,933,000 at December 31, 2010.
Total deposits decreased $7,865,000 with non-interest bearing demand deposits increasing $8,773,000
and interest bearing deposits decreasing $16,638,000. Short-term borrowings decreased $252,000 due
to the decrease in treasury tax and loan payments outstanding at the end of the two periods. FHLB
advances decreased $31,000 at June 30, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010. This was due to the
annual payment on a long-term advance held at the Bank.
Non-Performing Assets
Non-performing assets include loans on which interest accruals have ceased, loans past due 90 days
or more and still accruing, loans that have been renegotiated, real estate in the redemption
period, and real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Table 4
reflects the levels of these assets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Non-performing assets increased $1,394,000 from December 31, 2010 to June 30, 2011. Non-accrual
loans increased $1,680,000 to $13,348,000 at June 30, 2011. Renegotiated loans increased $595,000
to $4,249,000 at June 30, 2011 and other real estate decreased $888,000 to $1,854,000. REO in
redemption increased $140,000 to $968,000 and was also moved from the non-performing assets
classification to the non-performing loans classification at the end of the first quarter of 2011,
when compared to December 31, 2011.
The level and composition of non-performing assets is affected by economic conditions in the
Corporations local markets. Non-performing assets, charge-offs, and provisions for loan losses
tend to decline in a strong economy and increase in a weak economy, potentially impacting the
Corporations operating results. In addition to non-performing loans, management carefully monitors
other credits that are current in terms of principal and interest payments but, in managements
opinion, may deteriorate in quality if economic conditions change.
42
Table 5 Non-Performing Assets and Past Due Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Non-Performing Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Past Due 90 Days or More & Still Accruing |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
Non-Accrual Loans |
|
|
13,348 |
|
|
|
11,668 |
|
Renegotiated Loans |
|
|
4,249 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
REO in Redemption |
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Performing Loans |
|
|
18,565 |
|
|
|
16,283 |
|
|
|
|
Other Non-Performing Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Real Estate |
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
|
|
Total Other Non-Performing Assets |
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Performing Assets |
|
$ |
20,419 |
|
|
$ |
19,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Performing Loans as a % of Total Loans |
|
|
9.34 |
% |
|
|
7.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Performing Loans as a % of Total Loans and Other Real Estate |
|
|
9.25 |
% |
|
|
7.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses as a % of Non-Performing Loans |
|
|
48.09 |
% |
|
|
61.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More to Total Loans |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing Assets as a % of Total Assets |
|
|
6.73 |
% |
|
|
4.48 |
% |
While total non performing assets increased from December 31, 2010 to June 30, 2011, the ratio of
allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans decreased. This was the result of loans that
transitioned into non-accrual loans during the six month period ended June 30, 2011. These loans
had previously been specifically reserved for in the allowance for loan losses; therefore no
additional provision was required.
Certain portions of the Corporations non-performing loans included in Table 5 are considered
impaired. The Corporation measures impairment on all large balance non-accrual commercial loans.
Certain large balance accruing loans rated watch or monitor are also analyzed for possible
impairment. Impairment losses are believed to be appropriately covered by the allowance for loan
losses.
The Corporation maintains policies and procedures to identify and monitor non-accrual loans. A
loan is placed on non-accrual when there is doubt regarding collection of principal or interest, or
when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more. Accrued but uncollected interest is
reversed against income for the current quarter when a loan is placed on non-accrual. At June 30,
2011, there were $0 loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing. Management is not aware of
any loans that have not been moved to non-accrual or not been reclassified to troubled debt
restructures at June 30, 2011. The potential, however, remains that a borrower may become
financially distressed in the future and management may place that loan into non-accrual, but this
is difficult to predict.
Liquidity and Interest Rate Risk Management
Asset/Liability management is designed to assure liquidity and reduce interest rate risks. The goal
in managing interest rate risk is to maintain a strong and relatively stable net interest margin.
It is the responsibility of the Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO) to set policy
guidelines and to establish short-term and long-term strategies with respect to interest rate
exposure and balance sheet liquidity. The ALCO, which is comprised of key members of management,
meets regularly to review financial performance and soundness, including interest rate risk and
liquidity in relation to present and prospective markets and business conditions. Accordingly, the
committee adopts funding and balance sheet management strategies that are intended to maximize
earnings, maintain liquidity, and achieve balance sheet composition objectives.
43
Liquidity maintenance together with a solid capital base and strong earnings performance are key
objectives of the Corporation. The Corporations liquidity is derived from a strong deposit base
comprised of individual and business deposits. Deposit accounts of customers in the mature market
represent a substantial portion of deposits of individuals. The Banks deposit base plus other
funding sources (federal funds purchased, short-term borrowings, FHLB advances, other liabilities
and shareholders equity) provided primarily all funding needs in the first six months of 2011.
While these sources of funds are expected to continue to be available to provide funds in the
future, the mix and availability of funds will depend upon future economic conditions. The
Corporation does not foresee any difficulty in meeting its funding requirements.
Primary liquidity is provided through short-term investments or borrowings (including federal funds
sold and purchased) while the securities portfolio provides secondary liquidity. The securities
portfolio has increased $10,958,000 since December 31, 2010 due to purchases in the available for
sale investment portfolio, which utilized a portion of the excess liquid funds. Multiple available
for sale securities with elevated credit risk were sold and the proceeds used to purchase mortgage
backed instruments with lower credit risk during the fourth quarter of 2010. The Corporation has
re-invested some of the funds, from the call and maturities of these securities, back into the
securities portfolio to increase yield and manage the asset concentration of the balance sheet. The
Corporation regularly monitors liquidity to ensure adequate cash flows to cover unanticipated
reductions in the availability of funding sources.
Interest rate risk is managed by controlling and limiting the level of earnings volatility arising
from rate movements. The Corporation regularly performs reviews and analysis of those factors
impacting interest rate risk. Factors include maturity and re-pricing frequency of balance sheet
components, impact of rate changes on interest margin and prepayment speeds, market value impacts
of rate changes, and other issues. Both actual and projected performance are reviewed, analyzed,
and compared to policy and objectives to assure present and future financial viability.
The Corporation had cash used in financing activities resulting from the decrease of deposits, a
decrease in short term borrowings, partial repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and the
sale of a subsidiary bank. In the first six months of 2011 deposits decreased $7,865,000, short
term borrowings decreased $252,000 and Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $31,000. Cash
provided by investing activities was $92,968 in first six months of 2011 compared to $56,633 in
first six months of 2010. The change in investing activities was due to the sale of a subsidiary
bank.
Capital Resources
Management closely monitors bank capital levels to provide for current and future business needs
and to comply with regulatory requirements. Regulations prescribed under the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 have defined adequately capitalized institutions as
those having total risk-based ratios, tier 1 risk-based capital ratios and tier 1 leverage ratios
of at least 8%, 4%, and 4%, respectively. At June 30, 2011, The State Bank was in excess of the
minimum adequately capitalized capital and leverage requirements as defined by federal law; however
The State Bank was not in compliance with the capital requirements prescribed by the Consent Order.
Total shareholders equity increased 2.2% to $16,411,000 at June 30, 2011 compared with $16,055,000
at December 31, 2010. The increase was due to the net income in the first six months of 2011, along
with increases in other comprehensive income as noted below. The Corporations equity to asset
ratio was 5.4% at June 30, 2011 and 3.8% at December 31, 2010.
As indicated on the balance sheet at December 31, 2010, the Corporation had accumulated other
comprehensive income of $61,000 compared to accumulated other comprehensive income of $289,000 at
June 30, 2011. The fluctuation in other comprehensive position is attributable to the fluctuation
of the market price of securities held in the available for sale portfolio.
44
For additional information on the Corporations capital resources please refer to Note 10 to the
financial statements which is incorporated herein by this reference.
Regulatory Orders
The Corporations primary source of cash to service its subordinated debt is dividends from the
subsidiary bank. Since the subsidiary bank has suspended dividends to the holding company, the
Corporation has elected to defer interest payments for five years on $14,000,000 of subordinated
debentures. The reason for the interest deferral is to maintain liquidity at the Holding Company.
The Corporation is not in default under either of the indentures. During this five year period,
the Corporation is precluded from paying shareholder dividends on its outstanding common stock.
The Corporation subsequently may give notice that it elects to shorten the deferral period, pay
accrued interest and return to the normal course of shareholder dividend payments.
In October 2010, management received a notice from The Federal Reserve which defined restrictions
being placed upon the Holding Company. The restrictions include the declaration or payment of any
dividends, the receipt of dividends from subsidiary Bank, the repayment of any principal or
interest on subordinated debentures or Trust Preferred securities, restrictions on debt, any
changes in Executive or Senior Management or change in the role of Senior Management. In addition,
the notice provided a directive for the Corporation to maintain sufficient capital levels.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Managements Discussion and Analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based
on the Corporations consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible
to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan
losses, income taxes, other real estate owned, and investment securities valuation. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Management believes that its critical accounting policies
include determining the allowance for loan losses and determining the fair value of securities,
carrying value of deferred tax assets and other financial instruments.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level we believe is appropriate to absorb future
losses identified and inherent in the loan portfolio. Our evaluation of the appropriateness of the
allowance for loan losses is an estimate based on reviews of individual loans, assessments of the
impact of current and anticipated economic conditions on the portfolio, and historical loss
experience. The allowance for loan losses represents managements best estimate, but significant
downturns in circumstances relating to loan quality or economic conditions could result in a
requirement for an increased allowance for loan losses in the near future. Likewise, an upturn in
loan quality or improved economic conditions may result in a decline in the required allowance for
loan losses. In either instance unanticipated changes could have a significant impact on operating
earnings.
The allowance for loan losses is increased through a provision charged to operating expense.
Uncollectible loans are charged-off through the allowance for loan losses. Recoveries of loans
previously charged-off are added to the allowance for loan losses. A loan is considered impaired
when it is probable that contractual interest and principal payments will not be collected either
for the amounts or by the dates as scheduled in the loan agreement.
Our accounting for income taxes involves the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities
primarily associated with differences in the timing of the recognition of revenues and expenses for
financial reporting and tax purposes. A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is
required when it is considered more likely than not that all or part of the benefit related to such
assets will not be realized. Management has reviewed the deferred tax position for the Corporation
at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The Corporation recognized a full valuation allowance at
the end of the second quarter of 2009.
45
At the end of each quarter management reviews the tax valuation allowance to determine if the
valuation allowance is still required. Following review at June 30, 2011, management believes the
continuation of the tax valuation allowance is warranted. In future periods, the valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets may be reversed to income to the extent that the related
deferred income tax assets are realized or the valuation allowance is otherwise no longer required.
Management will continue to monitor our deferred tax assets quarterly for changes affecting their
realizability.
Other Real Estate Owned and Foreclosed Assets are acquired through or as an alternative to loan
foreclosure. Such properties are initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs
when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is
expensed as are costs after acquisition.
The Corporation evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. In
determining other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) management considers many factors, including:
(1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the
financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was
affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt
security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated
recovery. The assessment of whether other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of
subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in
time.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Some financial instruments, such as loan commitments, credit lines, letters of credit, and
overdraft protection, are issued to meet customer financing needs. These are agreements to provide
credit or to support the credit of others, as long as conditions established in the contract are
met, and usually have expiration dates. Commitments may expire without being used.
Off-balance-sheet risk to credit loss exists up to the face amount of these instruments, although
material losses are not anticipated. The same credit policies are used to make such commitments as
are used for loans, including obtaining collateral at exercise of the commitment.
The contractual amount of financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk was as follows at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Commitments to make loans (at market rates) |
|
$ |
6,125 |
|
|
$ |
8,403 |
|
Unused lines of credit and letters of credit |
|
|
26,601 |
|
|
|
29,746 |
|
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information concerning quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk contained on
page 62 in the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, is
incorporated herein by reference.
Fentura Financial, Inc. faces market risk to the extent that both earnings and the fair value of
its financial instruments are affected by changes in interest rates. The Corporation manages this
risk with static GAP analysis and simulation modeling. For the first six months of 2011, the
results of these measurement techniques were within the Corporations policy guidelines. The
Corporation does not believe that there has been a material change in the nature of the
Corporations primary market risk exposures, including the categories of market risk to which the
Corporation is exposed and the particular markets that present the primary risk of loss to the
Corporation, or in how those exposures have been managed in 2011 compared to 2010.
The Corporations market risk exposure is mainly comprised of its vulnerability to interest rate
risk. Prevailing interest rates and interest rate relationships in the future will be primarily
determined by
46
market factors, which are outside of the Corporations control. All information provided in this
section consists of forward-looking statements. Reference is made to the section captioned Forward
Looking Statements in this quarterly report for a discussion of the limitations on the
Corporations responsibility for such statements.
Interest Rate Sensitivity Management
Interest rate sensitivity management seeks to maximize net interest income as a result of changing
interest rates, within prudent ranges of risk. The Corporation attempts to accomplish this
objective by structuring the balance sheet so that re-pricing opportunities exist for both assets
and liabilities in roughly equivalent amounts at approximately the same time intervals. Imbalances
in these re-pricing opportunities at any point in time constitute a banks interest rate
sensitivity. The Corporation currently does not utilize derivatives in managing interest rate risk.
An indicator of the interest rate sensitivity structure of a financial institutions balance sheet
is the difference between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities, and is referred to
as GAP. Table 5 sets forth the distribution of re-pricing of the Corporations earning assets and
interest bearing liabilities as of June 30, 2011, the interest rate sensitivity GAP, as defined
above, the cumulative interest rate sensitivity GAP, the interest rate sensitivity GAP ratio (i.e.
interest rate sensitive assets divided by interest rate sensitive liabilities) and the cumulative
sensitivity GAP ratio. The table also sets forth the time periods in which earning assets and
liabilities will mature or may re-price in accordance with their contractual terms.
Table 6 GAP Analysis June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
Three |
|
|
One to |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Months to |
|
|
Five |
|
|
Five |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Months |
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds Sold |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
Securities |
|
|
9,578 |
|
|
|
9,416 |
|
|
|
17,712 |
|
|
|
20,477 |
|
|
|
57,183 |
|
Loans |
|
|
34,926 |
|
|
|
35,434 |
|
|
|
90,208 |
|
|
|
36,349 |
|
|
|
196,917 |
|
Loans Held for Sale |
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
FHLB Stock |
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
Total Earning Assets |
|
$ |
51,034 |
|
|
$ |
44,850 |
|
|
$ |
107,920 |
|
|
$ |
56,826 |
|
|
$ |
260,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Demand Deposits |
|
$ |
44,530 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
44,530 |
|
Savings Deposits |
|
|
68,213 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
68,213 |
|
Time Deposits Less than $100,000 |
|
|
6,996 |
|
|
|
22,175 |
|
|
|
24,778 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
54,032 |
|
Time Deposits Greater than $100,000 |
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
14,322 |
|
|
|
17,019 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
37,520 |
|
Short term borrowings |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
Other Borrowings |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities |
|
$ |
140,545 |
|
|
$ |
36,497 |
|
|
$ |
41,946 |
|
|
$ |
857 |
|
|
$ |
219,845 |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Sensitivity GAP |
|
$ |
(89,511 |
) |
|
$ |
8,353 |
|
|
|
65,974 |
|
|
$ |
55,969 |
|
|
$ |
40,785 |
|
Cumulative Interest Rate
Sensitivity GAP |
|
$ |
(89,511 |
) |
|
$ |
(81,158 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,184 |
) |
|
$ |
40,785 |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Sensitivity GAP |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
66.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Interest Rate
Sensitivity GAP Ratio |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
As indicated in Table 6, the short-term (one year and less) cumulative interest rate
sensitivity gap is negative. Accordingly, if market interest rates increase, this negative gap
position could have a short-term negative impact on interest margin. Conversely, if market rates
decline this should theoretically have a short-term positive impact. However, gap analysis is
limited and may not provide an accurate indication
47
of the impact of general interest rate movements on the net interest margin since the re-pricing of
various categories of assets and liabilities is subject to the Corporations needs, competitive
pressures, and the needs of the Corporations customers. In addition, various assets and
liabilities indicated as re-pricing within the same period may in fact re-price at different times
within such period and at different rate indices. The Prime Rate has remained steady over the past
twelve months. This steadiness allowed management to close the gap related to interest rate
sensitivity. Management was able to reduce liquid interest bearing liability rates to extremely low
rates, while maintaining relatively similar volumes. The Banks were also able to re-price maturing
time deposits, usually in a downward fashion as longer term certificates at higher rates matured
during the year. On the asset side of the balance sheet, rates on the investment portfolios
declined as well as the yields on loans. Management worked to re-price loans favorably as they
renewed and were priced accordingly for risk, however overall loan yields decreased. This was due
to increases in non-performing loans. The Corporation expects to continue to make strides in
managing interest rate sensitivity.
Forward Looking Statements
This report includes forward-looking statements as that term is used in the securities laws. All
statements regarding our expected financial position, business and strategies are forward-looking
statements. In addition, the words anticipates, believes, estimates, seeks, expects,
plans, intends, and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. The presentation and discussion of the provision and
allowance for loan losses and statements concerning future profitability or future growth or
increases, are examples of inherently forward looking statements in that they involve judgments and
statements of belief as to the outcome of future events. Our ability to predict results or the
actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a
material adverse affect on our operations and our future prospects include, but are not limited to,
changes in: interest rates, general economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, monetary
and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal
Reserve Board, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan
products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in our market area and
accounting principles, policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered
in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such
statements. Further information concerning us and our business, including additional factors that
could materially affect our financial results, is included in our other filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Corporations Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Corporations
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, have concluded that
the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure
that material information relating to the Corporation would be made known to them by others
within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this Form 10-Q was being
prepared. |
|
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Controls. During the period covered by this report, there have
been no changes in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting that have
materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Corporations internal
control over financial reporting. |
48
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings. None
Item 1A. Risk Factors This item is not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
|
|
|
As previously disclosed, in the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation elected to
defer regularly scheduled quarterly interest payments on its outstanding junior
subordinated debentures relating to its trust preferred securities. Therefore, the
Corporation is currently in arrears with the interest payments on the subordinated
debentures, as permitted by the related documentation. As of June 30, 2011, the
amount of the arrearages on the junior subordinated debentures was $1,245,000. |
Item 4. [Reserved]
Item 5. Other Information. None
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
10.1 |
|
Amended and restated supplemental executive retirement plan
with Daniel J. Wollschlager (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed on
May 2, 2011). |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Amended and restated supplemental executive retirement plan
with Donald Grill (filed herewith). |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura
Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of Fentura
Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura
Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
101 |
|
Interactive data file. |
49
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fentura Financial, Inc.
|
|
Dated: August 12, 2011 |
|
/s/ Donald L. Grill |
|
|
|
Donald L. Grill |
|
|
|
President & CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 12, 2011 |
|
/s/ Douglas J. Kelley |
|
|
|
Douglas J. Kelley |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |
|
50
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and restated supplemental executive retirement plan with Daniel J. Wollschlager
(incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amended and restated supplemental executive retirement plan with Donald Grill (filed
herewith). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant
to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101
|
|
Interactive data file. |
51