def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment
No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
|
þ |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
o |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to 240.14a-12 |
MGM MIRAGE
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11 |
|
|
1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by
registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
1) |
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
MGM MIRAGE
3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON
May 3, 2005
To the Stockholders:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of MGM MIRAGE, a Delaware
corporation (the Company), will be held at Bellagio,
3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada
on May 3, 2005, at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, for the
following purposes:
|
|
|
1. To elect a Board of Directors; |
|
|
2. To consider and act upon the approval of an amendment to
the Companys certificate of incorporation providing for an
increase in the number of authorized shares of our common stock
from 300,000,000 to 600,000,000; |
|
|
|
3. To consider and act upon the approval of the
Companys 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan; |
|
|
|
4. To consider and act upon the ratification of the
selection of independent auditors; and |
|
|
5. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournments thereof. |
Stockholders of record at the close of business on
March 14, 2005 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the
meeting. A list of such stockholders will be available for
examination by any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the
meeting, during ordinary business hours, at the Companys
executive offices, located at 3600 Las Vegas Blvd.
South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, for a period of
10 days prior to the meeting date.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
and Chief Executive Officer |
April 8, 2005
PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED PROXY OR
INDICATE YOUR PREFERENCE USING THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE.
Use of the enclosed envelope requires no postage for mailing
in the United States.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MGM MIRAGE
3600 Las Vegas Blvd. South
Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
PROXY STATEMENT
April 8, 2005
General
The form of proxy accompanying this Proxy Statement and the
persons named therein as proxies have been approved by, and this
solicitation is made on behalf of, the Board of Directors of MGM
MIRAGE in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
MGM MIRAGE to be held at Bellagio, 3600 Las Vegas
Boulevard South, Las Vegas Nevada on May 3, 2005, at
10:00 a.m., Pacific time, and at any postponements or
adjournments thereof. MGM MIRAGE, together with its
subsidiaries, is referred to herein as the Company,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
Matters to be considered and acted upon at the meeting are set
forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy
Statement and are more fully outlined herein. This Proxy
Statement was first mailed to stockholders on or about
April 8, 2005.
Voting Rights and Outstanding Shares
Only stockholders of record of the Companys Common Stock,
$.01 par value per share (the Common Stock), as of
March 14, 2005 will be entitled to vote at the meeting. The
authorized capital stock of the Company presently consists of
300,000,000 shares of Common Stock. At the close of business on
March 14, 2005, 143,353,071 shares of Common Stock were
outstanding and entitled to vote. Each stockholder of record is
entitled to one vote for each share held on that date on all
matters that may come before the meeting. There is no cumulative
voting in the election of directors.
You may vote in person by attending the meeting, by completing
and returning a proxy by mail or by using the Internet or
telephone. To vote your proxy by mail, mark your vote on the
enclosed proxy card, then follow the instructions on the card.
To vote your proxy using the Internet or by telephone, see the
instructions on the proxy form and have the proxy form available
when you access the Internet website or place your telephone
call.
All shares represented by properly executed proxies will, unless
such proxies have previously been revoked, be voted at the
meeting in accordance with the directions on the proxies. If no
direction is indicated, the shares will be voted in favor of the
nominees for the Board of Directors listed in this Proxy
Statement and in favor of Proposals 2, 3 and 4, as
described herein. By signing, dating and returning the enclosed
proxy card, you will confer discretionary authority on the named
proxies to vote on any matter not specified in the notice of
meeting. Management knows of no other business to be transacted,
but if any other matters do come before the meeting, the persons
named as proxies or their substitutes will vote or act with
respect to such other matters in accordance with their best
judgment.
Quorum and Votes Required
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of at least
a majority of the total number of outstanding shares of the
Common Stock is necessary to constitute a quorum at the meeting.
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street
name by a broker, your broker, as the record holder of the
shares, must vote those shares in accordance with your
instructions. In accordance with the rules of the New York Stock
Exchange (the Exchange), certain matters submitted
to a vote of stockholders are considered by the Exchange to be
routine items upon which brokerage firms may vote in
their discretion on behalf of their
customers if such customers have not furnished voting
instructions within a specified period prior to the meeting. For
those matters that the Exchange determines to be
non-routine, brokerage firms that have not received
instructions from their customers would not have discretion to
vote. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present
for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a
quorum for the transaction of business.
The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast at the
meeting will be required for the election of directors. The
affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Common Stock will be required for approval of Proposal 2. A
broker non-vote will have the same effect as a vote against
Proposal 2. Each other item to be acted upon at the meeting
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the shares of Common Stock represented at the meeting in person
or by proxy and entitled to vote on the item, assuming that a
quorum is present or represented at the meeting. A properly
executed proxy marked WITHHOLD AUTHORITY with
respect to the election of one or more directors will not be
voted with respect to the director or directors indicated, and
will have no effect. With respect to the other proposals, a
properly executed proxy marked ABSTAIN, although
counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum,
will not be voted. Accordingly, an abstention will have the same
effect as a vote cast against a proposal.
How to Revoke or Change Your Vote
Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation is revocable by
the communication of such revocation in writing to the Secretary
of the Company at any time prior to the exercise thereof, and
any person executing a proxy, if in attendance at the meeting,
may vote in person instead of by proxy.
Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials and Annual Report
The Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and the
Companys 2004 Annual Report are available on our website
at www.mgmmirage.com under the caption Investor
Relations. In the future, instead of receiving copies of
the proxy statement and annual report in the mail, stockholders
may elect to receive an e-mail with a link to these documents on
the Internet. Receiving your proxy materials online saves the
Company the cost of producing and mailing documents to your home
or business and gives you an automatic link to the proxy voting
site.
Stockholders of Record. If your shares are registered in
your own name, to enroll in the electronic delivery service go
directly to our transfer agents website at
www.melloninvestor.com/ISD anytime and follow the
instructions.
Beneficial Stockholders. If your shares are not
registered in your name, to enroll in the electronic delivery
service check the information provided to you by your bank or
broker, or contact your bank or broker for information on
electronic delivery service.
Delivery of One Proxy Statement and Annual Report to a Single
Household to Reduce Duplicate Mailings
Each year in connection with the Companys Annual Meeting
of Stockholders, the Company is required to send to each
stockholder of record a proxy statement and annual report and to
arrange for a proxy statement and annual report to be sent to
each beneficial stockholder whose shares are held by or in the
name of a broker, bank, trust or other nominee. Because many
stockholders hold shares of the Companys common stock in
multiple accounts, this process results in duplicate mailings of
proxy statements and annual reports to stockholders who share
the same address. Stockholders may avoid receiving duplicate
mailings and save the Company the cost of producing and mailing
duplicate documents as follows:
Stockholders of Record. If your shares are registered in
your own name and you are interested in consenting to the
delivery of a single proxy statement or annual report, to enroll
in the electronic delivery service go directly to our transfer
agents website at www.melloninvestor.com/ISD
anytime and follow the instructions.
2
Beneficial Stockholders. If your shares are not
registered in your own name, your broker, bank, trust or other
nominee that holds your shares may have asked you to consent to
the delivery of a single proxy statement or annual report if
there are other MGM MIRAGE stockholders who share an
address with you. If you currently receive more than one proxy
statement or annual report at your household, and would like to
receive only one copy of each in the future, you should contact
your nominee.
Right to Request Separate Copies. If you consent to the
delivery of a single proxy statement and annual report but later
decide that you would prefer to receive a separate copy of the
proxy statement or annual report, as applicable, for each
stockholder sharing your address, then please notify us or your
nominee, as applicable, and we or they will promptly deliver
such additional proxy statements or annual reports. If you wish
to receive a separate copy of the proxy statement or annual
report for each stockholder sharing your address in the future,
you may contact Mellon Investor Services directly by telephone
at 1-800-356-2017 or by visiting our transfer agents
website at www.melloninvestor.com/ISD and following the
instructions thereon.
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
Shown below is certain information as of March 14, 2005
with respect to beneficial ownership, as that term is defined in
Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act), of shares of Common Stock by the only
persons or entities known to the Company to be a beneficial
owner of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of
Common Stock, by the Named Executives, as defined under
Executive Compensation, and by all directors and
executive officers of the Company as a group who held office as
of the date of this Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
of | |
Name and Address(1) |
|
Owned(2) | |
|
Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Tracinda Corporation
|
|
|
81,196,432 |
(3) |
|
|
56.6 |
% |
|
150 South Rodeo Drive, Suite 250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverly Hills, CA 90212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Capital Management
|
|
|
13,307,175 |
(4) |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
8889 Pelican Bay Boulevard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naples, FL 34108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Terrence Lanni
|
|
|
700,000 |
(5) |
|
|
|
(7) |
Robert H. Baldwin
|
|
|
315,000 |
(5) |
|
|
|
(7) |
John T. Redmond
|
|
|
257,000 |
(5) |
|
|
|
(7) |
James J. Murren
|
|
|
1,088,000 |
(5) |
|
|
|
(7) |
Gary N. Jacobs
|
|
|
471,323 |
(5) |
|
|
|
(7) |
All directors and executive officers as a group (26 persons)
|
|
|
84,578,097 |
(6) |
|
|
57.9 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Unless otherwise indicated, the address for the persons listed
is 3600 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Las Vegas, Nevada
89109. |
|
(2) |
Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable
community property and similar laws, the persons listed as
beneficial owners of the shares have sole voting and investment
power with respect to such shares. |
|
(3) |
Tracinda Corporation (Tracinda), a Nevada
corporation, is wholly owned by Kirk Kerkorian. |
|
(4) |
Based upon a Schedule 13G, dated February 14, 2005,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) by Private Capital Management, L.P., an
investment advisor under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940,
which is deemed to be the beneficial owner of
13,307,175 shares of Common Stock as a result of acting as
investment advisor to its clients. |
|
(5) |
Included in these amounts are 550,000 shares,
240,000 shares, 180,000 shares, 1,000,000 shares
and 438,900 shares underlying options that are exercisable as of
March 14, 2005 or that become exercisable within
60 days thereafter held by Messrs. Lanni, Baldwin,
Redmond, Murren, and Jacobs, respectively. |
3
|
|
|
Also included in these amounts are 150,000 shares of
restricted stock held by Mr. Lanni, 75,000 shares of
restricted stock held by each of Messrs. Baldwin, Redmond
and Murren, and 25,000 shares of restricted stock held by
Mr. Jacobs, all of which shares of restricted stock are
scheduled to vest 50% on June 3, 2005, and 50% on
June 3, 2006. |
|
(6) |
Also included are 209,300 shares subject to stock options
exercisable as of March 14, 2005 or that become exercisable
within 60 days thereafter, held by non-employee directors.
Additionally included are a total of 209,375 shares
underlying options that are exercisable as of March 14,
2005 or that become exercisable within 60 days thereafter
held by non-director executive officers. Additionally included
are 30,000 shares of restricted stock held by non-director
executive officers, all of which shares of restricted stock are
scheduled to vest 50% on June 3, 2005 and 50% on
June 3, 2006, respectively. |
|
(7) |
Less than one percent (1%). |
As indicated above, Mr. Kerkorian, through his ownership of
Tracinda, beneficially owns over 50% of the currently
outstanding shares of Common Stock. Tracinda intends to vote its
shares of Common Stock in favor of the nominees for the Board of
Directors listed in the Proxy Statement. Since the holders of
Common Stock do not have cumulative voting rights and since
Tracindas shares represent more than 50% of the shares to
be voted at the meeting, Tracinda will be able to elect the
entire Board of Directors. Tracinda also intends to vote its
shares in favor of Proposals 2, 3 and 4, and Tracindas
vote will be sufficient to cause adoption of those Proposals.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Proposal No. 1
Information Concerning the Nominees
One of the purposes of the meeting is to elect 17 directors,
each of whom will serve until the next annual meeting of
stockholders or until his or her respective successor shall have
been elected and qualified or until his or her earlier
resignation or removal.
The following table sets forth, for each nominee, his or her
name, principal occupation for at least the past five years,
beneficial ownership of Company Common Stock, age as of
March 14, 2005 and certain other matters. In the event any
of said nominees should be unavailable to serve as director,
which contingency is not presently anticipated, it is the
intention of the persons named in the proxies to select and cast
their votes for the election of such other person or persons as
the Board of Directors may designate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
First | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
Principal Occupation and |
|
Became a | |
|
Beneficially | |
Name (age) |
|
Other Directorships |
|
Director | |
|
Owned(1) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
James D. Aljian (72)
|
|
Executive of Tracinda since October 1987. Director of
Chrysler Corporation from February 1996 to
November 1998, and Member of Shareholders Committee
of DaimlerChrysler AG from November
1998 to December 2000. Director of
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., a California-based motion picture
studio in which Tracinda has an approximate 68.7% ownership
interest (collectively with its subsidiaries,
MGM Inc.). |
|
|
1988 |
|
|
|
51,800 |
(2)(3) |
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
First | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
Principal Occupation and |
|
Became a | |
|
Beneficially | |
Name (age) |
|
Other Directorships |
|
Director | |
|
Owned(1) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Robert H. Baldwin (54)
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of Mirage Resorts,
Incorporated (Mirage Resort) since June 2000.
President of Project CC, LLC (CityCenter) since
March 2005. Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Mirage
Resorts on an interim basis from September 1999 to
June 2000. President and Chief Executive Officer of
Bellagio, LLC or its predecessor from June 1996 to
March 2005. President and Chief Executive Officer of The
Mirage Casino-Hotel from August 1987 to April 1997. |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
315,000 |
(2)(3) |
Terry N. Christensen (64)
|
|
Managing partner, Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser,
Weil & Shapiro, LLP, attorneys, Los Angeles,
California, since May 1988. Director of GIANT GROUP, LTD.,
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. and Fidelity National
Financial, Inc. |
|
|
1987 |
|
|
|
25,500 |
(2)(3) |
Willie D. Davis (70)
|
|
President and a Director of All-Pro Broadcasting, Inc., an AM
and FM radio broadcasting company, for more than the past five
years. Director of and member of the Audit Committee of
MGM Inc., Sara Lee Corporation, Johnson Controls,
Inc., Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. and Manpower, Inc.
Also Director of Alliance Bancshares California, Dow Chemical
Company, Strong Funds and Wisconsin Energy Corporation. |
|
|
1989 |
|
|
|
31,300 |
(2)(3) |
Alexander M. Haig, Jr. (80)
|
|
Chairman of Worldwide Associates, Inc., an international
business advisory firm, for more than the past five years. Host
of World Business Review, a weekly television
program. Director of MGM Inc. Consultant to the Company
since 1990. |
|
|
1990 |
|
|
|
31,400 |
(2)(3) |
Alexis Herman (57)
|
|
Chair and Chief Executive Officer of New Ventures. Director and
member of the Audit Committee of Cummins Inc. Also Director of
Presidential Life Insurance Corporation, Entergy Corp. and
several non-profit organizations. Chairs diversity advisory
boards for the Coca-Cola Company and Toyota. United States
Secretary of Labor from 1997 to 2001. Prior to that, served for
four years as Assistant to the President and Director of the
White House Office of Public Liaison. |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
9,650 |
(2)(3) |
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
First | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
Principal Occupation and |
|
Became a | |
|
Beneficially | |
Name (age) |
|
Other Directorships |
|
Director | |
|
Owned(1) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Roland Hernandez (47)
|
|
Owner and manager of media holdings in Texas. Founder and
President of Interspan Communications. Director and Chairman of
the Audit Committee of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Director and member
of the Audit Committee and Finance Committee of the Ryland
Group. Director and member of the Audit Committee of Vail
Resorts, Inc., and Director of Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Telemundo
Group, Inc. from August 1998 to December 2000, and
President and Chief Executive Officer of Telemundo Group, Inc.
from March 1995 to July 1998. |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
12,250 |
(2)(3) |
Gary N. Jacobs (59)
|
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Company
since June 2000 and Secretary of the Company since
January 2002. Prior to June 2000, partner,
Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil &
Shapiro, LLP. Mr. Jacobs is of counsel to that firm and is
a Director and Secretary of The InterGroup Corporation. |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
471,323 |
(2)(3) |
Kirk Kerkorian (87)
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and sole director and
stockholder of Tracinda. Director of MGM Inc. since October 1996. |
|
|
1987 |
|
|
|
81,196,432 |
(4) |
J. Terrence Lanni (62)
|
|
Chairman of the Company since July 1995. Chairman of the
Executive Committee since June 1995. Chief Executive
Officer of the Company from June 1995 to
December 1999, and since March 2001. President of the
Company from June 1995 to July 1995. President and
Chief Operating Officer of Caesars World, Inc. from
April 1981 to February 1995, and a director from
January 1982 to February 1991. Director of
KB Home since August 2003 and the Jim Pattison Group
since February 2003. |
|
|
1995 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
(2)(3) |
George J. Mason (74)
|
|
Senior Managing Director of Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.,
Los Angeles, California, an investment banking and
brokerage firm, and has been employed by that firm since 1973.
Director of Mirage Resorts from 1973 to May 2000. |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
76,000 |
(2)(3) |
James J. Murren (43)
|
|
President and Chief Financial Officer since December 1999,
and Treasurer since November 2001. Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company from
January 1998 to December 1999. Prior thereto, Managing
Director and Co-Director of research for Deutsche Morgan
Grenfell (DMG), having served DMG in various other
capacities since 1984. |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
1,088,000 |
(2)(3) |
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
First | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
Principal Occupation and |
|
Became a | |
|
Beneficially | |
Name (age) |
|
Other Directorships |
|
Director | |
|
Owned(1) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Ronald M. Popeil (69)
|
|
Chief Executive Officer of Ronco Inventions, LLC, the principal
business of which is inventing and marketing consumer products.
Mr. Popeil was also a Director of Mirage Resorts from 1979
to May 2000. |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
31,000 |
(2)(3) |
John T. Redmond (46)
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of MGM Grand Resorts,
LLC (MGM Grand Resorts) since March 2001.
Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company from
December 1999 to March 2001. President and Chief
Operating Officer of Primm Valley Resorts from March 1999
to December 1999. Senior Vice President of MGM Grand
Development, Inc. from August 1996 to February 1999.
Director of MGM Grand Detroit, LLC since July 1997,
Vice- Chairman from April 1998 to February 2000, and
Chairman since February 2000. Prior to 1996, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Caesars Palace and
Desert Inn, having served in various other senior operational
and development positions with Caesars World, Inc. |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
257,000 |
(2)(3) |
Daniel M. Wade (52)
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Company since March 2001. Co-Chief
Executive Officer of the Company from December 1999 to
March 2001. Chief Operating Officer of the Company from
April 1999 to December 1999, and Executive Vice
President of the Company from October 1998 to
April 1999. Prior thereto, President and Chief Operating
Officer of MGM Grand Hotel, Inc., having served in various
other senior capacities with MGM Grand Hotel, Inc. since
January 1990. |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
10,100 |
(2)(3) |
Melvin B. Wolzinger (84)
|
|
A principal owner of various privately-held restaurants and
casino gaming establishments in Las Vegas since 1991.
Director of Mirage Resorts from 1973 to May 2000. Director
of Colonial Bank, and Director of several non-profit
organizations. Formerly, a general partner in
W. W. Investment Co., a real estate holding company in
Las Vegas, Nevada, from 1980 through 1998. |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
26,650 |
(2)(3) |
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
First | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
Principal Occupation and |
|
Became a | |
|
Beneficially | |
Name (age) |
|
Other Directorships |
|
Director | |
|
Owned(1) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Alex Yemenidjian (49)
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
MGM Inc. since April 1999 and a Director of
MGM Inc. since November 1997. President of the Company from
July 1995 to December 1999. Chief Operating Officer of the
Company from June 1995 to April 1999. Executive Vice President
of the Company from June 1992 to July 1995, and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company from May 1994 to January 1998.
President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from
March 1990 to January 1991. Executive of Tracinda from
January 1990 to January 1997, and from February 1999 to April
1999. |
|
|
1989 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
(2)(3) |
|
|
(1) |
Except as otherwise indicated and subject to applicable
community property and similar laws, the persons listed as
beneficial owners of the shares have sole voting and investment
power with respect to such shares. |
|
(2) |
The number of shares shown as beneficially owned represents less
than 1% of the outstanding shares. |
|
(3) |
Included in these amounts are (a) shares underlying options
that are exercisable as of March 14, 2005 or become
exercisable within 60 days thereafter, and (b) shares
of restricted stock scheduled to vest 50% on June 3, 2005,
and 50% on June 3, 2006 held as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Shares of | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Restricted | |
Name |
|
Options | |
|
Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Mr. Aljian
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Baldwin
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Mr. Christensen
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Davis
|
|
|
31,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Haig
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Herman
|
|
|
8,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Hernandez
|
|
|
11,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Jacobs
|
|
|
438,900 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Mr. Lanni
|
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Mr. Mason
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Murren
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Mr. Popeil
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Redmond
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Mr. Wade
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Wolzinger
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Yemenidjian
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Shares are owned by Tracinda, which is wholly-owned by
Mr. Kerkorian. As of March 14, 2005, Tracinda owned
56.6% of the outstanding Common Stock (see Principal
Stockholders). |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the
Companys executive officers and directors to file reports
of ownership of the Common Stock with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Executive officers and
8
directors are required to furnish the Company with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms that they file. Based upon a review of
these filings and representations from the Companys
directors and executive officers that no other reports were
required, the Company notes that all reports for the year 2004
were filed on a timely basis.
INFORMATION REGARDING BOARD AND COMMITTEES
Board of Directors. The Board of Directors held six
meetings during 2004 and acted by unanimous consent on three
occasions. The work of the Companys directors is performed
not only at meetings of the Board of Directors and its
committees, but also by consideration of the Companys
business through the review of documents and in numerous
communications among Board members and others. During 2004, each
director attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board of
Directors and committees on which they served (held during the
period for which they served), other than Mr. Baldwin. The
Board of Directors does not have a standing nominating
committee. See Corporate Governance. The
candidates for election at this annual meeting were nominated by
the Board of Directors. Directors are expected to attend each
annual meeting of stockholders. Of the 17 members of the Board
of Directors in May 2004, 15 attended last years
annual meeting.
Executive Committee. During intervals between the
meetings of the Board of Directors, the Executive Committee
exercises all the powers of the Board (except those powers
specifically reserved by Delaware law or by the Companys
bylaws to the full Board of Directors) in the management and
direction of the Companys business and conduct of the
Companys affairs in all cases in which specific directions
have not been given by the Board. The current members of the
Executive Committee are J. Terrence Lanni (Chair), James D.
Aljian, Robert H. Baldwin, Terry N. Christensen, Roland
Hernandez, Gary N. Jacobs, Kirk Kerkorian, George Mason, James
J. Murren, John T. Redmond, Melvin B. Wolzinger and Alex
Yemenidjian. The Executive Committee held 11 meetings during
2004.
Audit Committee. The functions of the Audit Committee are
to review and approve the selection and retention of an
independent accounting firm to conduct an annual audit of the
Companys consolidated financial statements and to review
with such firm the plan, scope and results of such audit, and
the fees for the services performed. The Audit Committee also
reviews with the independent and internal auditors the adequacy
of internal control systems, receives internal audit reports and
reports its findings to the full Board of Directors. The Audit
Committee is composed exclusively of directors who are not
salaried employees of the Company, each of whom have been
determined by the Board of Directors to be
independent within the meaning of the listing
standards of the Exchange and free from any relationship which
would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a
committee member. The current members of the Audit Committee are
Roland Hernandez (Chair), Willie D. Davis and Alexis Herman. The
Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of
the Audit Committee is financially literate and that
Mr. Hernandez qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert, as defined in the Exchanges
listing standards and the Commissions regulations. In
addition, the Board of Directors has determined that the service
of Mr. Hernandez and Mr. Davis on other audit
committees, as described earlier in the description of each of
his principal occupation and other directorships under
Election of Directors, would not impair his ability
to effectively serve on the Companys Audit Committee. The
Board of Directors will review such determination at its meeting
following the stockholders meeting, when it makes
committee assignments for the coming year. The Audit Committee
held six meetings during 2004.
Compensation and Stock Option Committee. The primary
function of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee (the
Compensation Committee) is to ensure that the
compensation program for executives of the Company (1) is
effective in attracting and retaining key officers,
(2) links pay to business strategy and performance and
(3) is administered in a fair and equitable fashion in the
stockholders interests. The Compensation Committee
recommends executive compensation policy to the Board,
determines compensation of senior executives of the Company,
determines the performance criteria and bonuses to be granted
pursuant to the Companys Annual Performance-Based
Incentive Plan and administers and approves granting of Company
stock options and other equity-based forms of compensation,
including awards of restricted stock. The Compensation
Committees authority and oversight extends to total
compensation,
9
including base salaries, bonuses, stock options, and other forms
of compensation. The Compensation Committee is comprised
exclusively of directors who are not salaried employees of the
Company and who are, in the opinion of the Board of Directors,
free from any relationship that would interfere with the
exercise of independent judgment as a Compensation Committee
member. The current members of the Compensation Committee are
James D. Aljian (Chair), Ronald M. Popeil and Melvin B.
Wolzinger. The Compensation Committee held 14 meetings during
2004.
The Diversity Committee. The functions of the Diversity
Committee include developing, implementing and monitoring the
Companys diversity initiatives. The current members of the
Diversity Committee are Alexis Herman (Chair), Melvin B.
Wolzinger, Willie D. Davis, Roland Hernandez, and Daniel M.
Wade. The Diversity Committee held four meetings during 2004.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation. Mr. Aljian is an executive of Tracinda
and director of MGM Inc.
Director Compensation. Directors who are compensated as
full-time employees of the Company or its subsidiaries receive
no additional compensation for service on the Board of Directors
or its committees. During 2004, each director who is not a
full-time employee of the Company or its subsidiaries was paid
$38,000 per annum, plus $1,500 for each Board meeting attended
($750 if such Board meeting was attended telephonically) plus,
in the case of members of the Executive Committee, $1,000 per
meeting for each Executive Committee meeting attended ($500 if
such meeting of the Executive Committee was attended
telephonically). The Chair of the Audit Committee received a fee
of $2,500 per meeting attended ($1,250 if such meeting of the
Audit Committee was attended telephonically), and each other
member of the Audit Committee received $1,500 for each meeting
attended ($750 if such meeting of the Audit Committee was
attended telephonically). The Chair of the Compensation
Committee received $1,000 per quarter, and each other member of
the Compensation Committee received $750 per quarter. The Chair
of the Diversity Committee received a fee of $2,500 per meeting
attended ($1,250 if such meeting of the Diversity Committee was
attended telephonically), and the other members of the Diversity
Committee received a fee of $1,500 per meeting attended ($750 if
such meeting of the Diversity Committee was attended
telephonically). Directors are also reimbursed expenses for
attendance at Board and Committee meetings.
The Board of Directors of the Company has adopted a policy on
benefits available to directors. The policy provides for a
limited number of complimentary event tickets at the MGM Grand
Garden Arena for the personal use of directors, as well as
complimentary rooms, food and beverages for directors and their
spouses or significant others when staying at a Company property
on Company business and for complimentary rooms only when not on
Company business. The policy further provides for a limited
number of discounted rooms, on a space available basis, for
friends and family of directors staying at a Company property.
The Company maintains a stock option grant program pursuant to
the Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, which received Compensation
Committee approval and subsequent stockholder approval, whereby
members of the Companys Board of Directors who are not
full-time employees of the Company (other than
Mr. Kerkorian, who waived his right to receive stock
options from the Company for service on the Companys Board
of Directors) receive an initial grant of 10,000 stock options,
and subsequent yearly grants of 5,000 stock options during
their respective terms as directors.
During 2004, Alexander M. Haig, Jr., a member of the Board
of Directors of the Company, rendered consulting services to the
Company, for which he received a fee of $50,000.
Corporate Governance
New York Stock Exchange Listing Standards. The final
corporate governance rules of the Exchange were adopted in 2003.
Certain provisions of the new rules are not applicable to
controlled companies, defined by such rules to be
companies of which more than 50 percent of the voting power
is held by an individual, a group or another company. The
Company currently is a controlled company under this
definition by virtue of the ownership by Mr. Kerkorian and
Tracinda of in excess of 50 percent of the voting power of
the Common Stock and the ability to elect the entire Board of
Directors. Accordingly, the Company
10
has chosen to take advantage of certain of the exemptions
provided in the new rules specifically, the
requirements that listed companies have (i) a majority of
independent directors (although a majority of our directors are
independent) and (ii) a nominating/governance committee
composed entirely of independent directors.
Independence of Directors. Pursuant to the
Exchanges corporate governance rules, the Board assesses
each directors independence annually by reviewing any
potential conflicts of interest and outside affiliations, based
on the standards set forth below. The Board of Directors has
determined that Ms. Herman and Messrs. Aljian, Davis,
Haig, Hernandez, Kerkorian, Mason, Popeil, Wade, Wolzinger and
Yemenidjian, who constitute a majority of the Board, are
independent, within the meaning of the rules of the Exchange.
Under the standards of independence adopted by the Board of
Directors, a director is deemed to be independent only if the
Board determines that such director satisfies each of the
criteria set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
No Material Relationship. The director does not
have any material relationship with the Company. |
|
|
|
Employment. The director is not, and has not been
at any time in the past three years, an employee of the Company.
In addition, no member of the directors immediate family
is, or has been in the past three years, an executive officer of
the Company. |
|
|
|
Other Compensation. The director or immediate
family member has not received more than $100,000 in direct
compensation from the Company during any 12-month period within
the past three years, other than in the form of director fees,
pension, or other forms of deferred compensation for prior
service, provided such compensation is not contingent in any way
on continued service. Compensation received by a director for
former service as an interim Chairman, CEO or other executive
officer or compensation received by an immediate family member
for services as an employee (other than an executive officer) of
the Company need not be considered in determining independence
under this standard. |
|
|
|
Auditor Affiliation. The director is not a current
partner or employee of the Companys internal or external
auditors; no member of the directors immediate family is a
current partner of the Companys internal or external
auditors or a current employee of such auditors who participates
in such firms audit, assurance or tax compliance (but not
tax planning) practice; and the director or an immediate family
member has not been within the past three years a partner or
employee of the Companys internal or external auditor and
has not personally worked on the Companys audit within
that time. |
|
|
|
Interlocking Directorships. The director or an
immediate family member is not, and has not been within the past
three years, employed as an executive officer by another entity
where any of the Companys present executive officers at
the same time serves or served on that entitys
compensation committee. |
|
|
|
Business Transactions. The director is not an
employee, or an immediate family member is not an executive
officer, of another entity that, during any one of the past
three fiscal years, received payments from the Company, or made
payments to the Company, for property or services that exceed
the greater of $1 million or 2% of the other entitys
annual consolidated gross revenues. |
For the purposes of determining whether a director who is a
member of the Audit Committee is independent, the Company
applies additional independence standards, including those set
forth in Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and the Corporate Governance Rules of the New York Stock
Exchange applicable to audit committee composition.
Code of Conduct. The Board of Directors has adopted a
Code of Conduct and Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy (the
Code of Conduct) that applies to all of the
Companys directors and officers and certain of its
employees, including the chief executive officer and the chief
financial officer (who is also the principal accounting
officer). In addition, the Code of Conduct applies to all
personnel of the Company and its operating subsidiaries at the
Vice President or more senior level, and to all accounting and
finance personnel, and those personnel serving in such other
categories as the Company designates from time to time. The Code
of Conduct establishes policies and procedures that the Board
believes promote the highest standards of
11
integrity, compliance with the law and personal accountability.
The Companys Code of Conduct is posted on the
Companys website at www.mgmmirage.com under the
caption Investor Relations Corporate
Governance Code of Conduct and is provided to
all new directors, new officers and certain new employees and
distributed annually to all directors, officers and certain
employees of the Company, each of whom is required to
acknowledge in writing his or her receipt and understanding
thereof and agreement to adhere to the principles contained
therein.
Nomination of Directors. The Board of Directors does not
have a standing nominating committee, and as a controlled
company as defined by the Exchanges corporate
governance rules, the Company is not required to have a
nominating committee comprised solely of independent directors.
Identification, consideration and nomination of potential
candidates to serve on the Board of Directors are conducted by
the entire Board of Directors. The Board of Directors believes
it is in the best interests of the Company to avail itself of
the extensive business and other experience of each member of
the Board, including directors who may not be deemed
independent, in identifying, evaluating and
nominating potential candidates to serve as directors.
In determining the criteria for membership, the Board considers
the appropriate skills and personal characteristics required in
light of the then-current makeup of the Board and in the context
of the perceived needs of the Company at the time, including the
following experience and personal attributes: financial acumen;
general business experience; industry knowledge; diversity;
special business experience and expertise; leadership abilities;
high ethical standards; independence; interpersonal skills; and
overall effectiveness. The Board of Directors may receive
recommendations for Board candidates from various sources,
including the Companys directors, management and
stockholders. In addition, the Board may engage an independent
executive search firm to assist in identifying qualified
candidates.
The Board will review all recommended candidates in the same
manner regardless of the source of the recommendation.
Recommendations from public stockholders should be in writing
and addressed to: Corporate Secretary, MGM MIRAGE, 3600 Las
Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention:
Stockholder Communications, and must include the proposed
candidates name, address, age and qualifications together
with the information required under federal securities laws and
regulations. Such communication must be received in a timely
manner and also include the recommending stockholders
name, address and the number of shares of the Common Stock, and
the length of time, beneficially held. See Notice
Concerning Stockholder Proposals and Nominations.
Presiding Director. In accordance with the applicable
rules of the Exchange, the Board of Directors has scheduled
regular executive sessions of the non-management directors in
which directors have an opportunity to meet outside the presence
of management. Such sessions are chaired by Terry N.
Christensen, as Presiding Director, who was elected by, and
serves at the pleasure of, the Board of Directors. The Presiding
Director was selected by a majority of the non-management
directors and is responsible for convening such sessions and
setting the agenda.
Stockholder Communications with the Board. The Board of
Directors has established a process for stockholders to
communicate with members of the Board, including the
non-management directors and the Presiding Director. All such
communications should be in writing and should be addressed to
the Corporate Secretary, MGM MIRAGE, 3600 Las Vegas
Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention: Stockholder
Communications. All inquiries are reviewed by the Corporate
Secretary, who forwards to the Board a summary of all such
correspondence and copies of all communications that he
determines requires their attention. Matters relevant to other
departments of the Company are directed to such departments with
appropriate follow-up to ensure that inquiries are responded to
in a timely manner. Matters relating to accounting, auditing
and/or internal controls are referred to the Chairman of the
Audit Committee and included in the report to the Board,
together with a report of any action taken to address the
matter. The Board of Directors or the Audit Committee, as the
case may be, may direct such further action deemed necessary or
appropriate.
Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board of Directors
has adopted corporate governance guidelines for the Company
(Guidelines) setting forth the general principles
governing the conduct of the Companys business and the
role, functions, duties and responsibilities of the Board of
Directors, including, but not limited
12
to such matters as (i) composition, (ii) membership
criteria, (iii) orientation and continuing education,
(iv) committees, (v) compensation, (vi) meeting
procedures and (vii) annual evaluation. In addition to the
foregoing, the Guidelines provide for management succession
planning, communications with the Board and a code of conduct
governing all directors, officers and certain employees of the
Company. The Company believes that the Guidelines are in
compliance with the new listing standards adopted in 2003 by the
Exchange. The Guidelines are posted and maintained on the
Companys website at www.mgmmirage.com under the
caption Investor Relations Corporate
Governance Guidelines, and a copy will be made
available to any stockholder who requests it from the
Companys Secretary.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION
The following table summarizes the annual and long-term
compensation for services in all capacities to the Company for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, of the
following: (i) the Chief Executive Officer of the Company;
and (ii) the other four most highly compensated executive
officers of the Company at December 31, 2004 (collectively,
the Named Executives).
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Awards | |
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restricted | |
|
Shares | |
|
|
Name and |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Stock | |
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary(A) | |
|
Bonus(B) | |
|
Annual(C) | |
|
Awards(D) | |
|
Options(E) | |
|
Compensation(F) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
J. Terrence Lanni
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,393,553 |
|
|
$ |
42,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
817,162 |
|
|
Chairman and Chief |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,989,345 |
|
|
|
97,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
812,350 |
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
1,557,692 |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
181,972 |
|
|
|
5,284,500 |
|
|
|
270,000 |
(G) |
|
|
721,345 |
|
Robert H. Baldwin
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,542,327 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
473,554 |
|
|
President and Chief |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,490,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
500,081 |
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
1,278,846 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,642,250 |
|
|
|
720,000 |
(G) |
|
|
449,711 |
|
|
Mirage Resorts,
Incorporated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John T. Redmond
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
1,300,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,201,837 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
282,219 |
|
|
President and Chief |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
|
1,290,745 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
300,123 |
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
1,078,846 |
|
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,642,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,224 |
|
|
MGM Grand Resorts,
LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Murren
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
1,200,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,031,592 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
274,830 |
|
|
President, Chief |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,190,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
259,160 |
|
|
Financial Officer and |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
1,023,077 |
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,642,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,809 |
|
|
Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary N. Jacobs
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,180,366 |
|
|
$ |
4,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
274,590 |
|
|
Executive Vice |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
691,946 |
|
|
|
2,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
243,094 |
|
|
President, General |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
632,500 |
|
|
|
825,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
880,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,634 |
|
|
Counsel and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
On June 2, 2002, the Company entered into new Employment
Agreements with the Named Executive Officers, which new
employment agreements extended the term of the employment
contracts of each of the Named Executives from May 2004 to July
2006 and increased their minimum annual base salaries as
follows: Mr. Lanni, from $1,000,000 to $2,000,000;
Mr. Baldwin, from $1,000,000 to $1,500,000;
Mr. Redmond from $800,000 to $1,300,000; Mr. Murren,
from $800,000 to $1,200,000; and Mr. Jacobs, from $550,000
to $700,000. |
|
|
(B) |
In 2005, the Named Executives received bonuses for the 2004
fiscal year pursuant to the Companys Annual
Performance-Based Incentive Plan for executive officers as
follows: Mr. Lanni $3,393,553;
Mr. Baldwin $2,542,327;
Mr. Redmond $2,201,837;
Mr. Murren $2,031,592; and
Mr. Jacobs $1,180,366. In 2004, the Named
Executives received bonuses for the 2003 fiscal year pursuant to
the Companys Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan for
executive officers as follows: Mr. Lanni |
13
|
|
|
$1,989,345; Mr. Baldwin $1,490,345;
Mr. Redmond $1,290,745;
Mr. Murren $1,190,946; and
Mr. Jacobs $691,946. In 2003, the Named
Executives received bonuses for the 2002 fiscal year pursuant to
the Companys Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan for
executive officers as follows: Mr. Lanni
$2,500,000, Mr. Baldwin $2,000,000,
Mr. Redmond $1,600,000;
Mr. Murren $1,400,000 and
Mr. Jacobs $825,000. |
|
(C) |
Amount includes allocations to Mr. Lanni and
Mr. Jacobs for use of the Companys aircraft and for
2002 and 2003, a hotel suite for Mr. Lannis personal
use and reimbursement for taxes associated therewith. |
|
|
(D) |
The values reflected in the table are determined by multiplying
the number of shares of restricted stock awarded by the closing
market price of the Common Stock on the date of grant
(June 3, 2002). At the close of business on
December 31, 2004, the Named Executive Officers held shares
of non-vested restricted stock valued (based upon the closing
market price of the Common Stock, on December 31, 2004, of
$72.74) as follows: Mr. Lanni: 150,000 shares valued at
$10,911,000; each of Messrs. Baldwin, Redmond and Murren:
75,000 shares valued at $5,455,000; and Mr. Jacobs: 25,000
shares valued at $1,818,500. Dividends, if any, are paid on the
restricted shares at the same rate as paid to holders of the
Companys Common Stock. No dividends were paid in 2004. The
restricted stock awards are scheduled to vest 50% on
June 3, 2005, and 50% on June 3, 2006. |
|
|
(E) |
During 2002 and 2003, the only long-term compensation was
pursuant to the Companys Nonqualified Stock Option Plan.
No grants were made under either the Nonqualified Stock Option
Plan or the Incentive Stock Option Plan in 2004. |
|
|
(F) |
The amounts in this column represent the Company match under its
401(k) plan, the Company match under its Deferred Compensation
Plan (the DCP), the Company contribution under its
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the SERP),
group life insurance premiums paid for the benefit of the Named
Executives, reimbursement of medical expenses and associated
taxes, and premiums for long term disability insurance for the
benefit of the Named Executives as reflected in the following
table: |
All Other Compensation 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance | |
|
|
|
|
401(k) | |
|
DCP | |
|
SERP | |
|
Premiums and | |
|
|
Name |
|
Match | |
|
Match(1) | |
|
Contribution(2) | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mr. Lanni
|
|
$ |
4,100 |
|
|
$ |
75,900 |
|
|
$ |
716,956 |
|
|
$ |
20,206 |
|
|
$ |
817,162 |
|
Mr. Baldwin
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
55,900 |
|
|
|
374,904 |
|
|
|
38,650 |
|
|
|
473,554 |
|
Mr. Redmond
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
47,900 |
|
|
|
224,235 |
|
|
|
5,984 |
|
|
|
282,219 |
|
Mr. Murren
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
43,900 |
|
|
|
184,099 |
|
|
|
42,731 |
|
|
|
274,830 |
|
Mr. Jacobs
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
23,900 |
|
|
|
151,018 |
|
|
|
95,572 |
|
|
|
274,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The Company implemented the DCP, which is a nonqualified
deferred retirement plan effective January 1, 2001 for
certain key employees. The plan allows participants to defer, on
a pre-tax basis, a portion of their salary and bonus and
accumulate tax deferred earnings, plus investment earnings on
the deferred balances, as a retirement fund. Participants
receive a Company match of up to 4% of salary, net of any
Company match received under the Companys 401(k) plan. All
employee deferrals vest immediately. The Company matching
contributions vest ratably over a three-year period. |
|
|
(2) |
The Company implemented the SERP effective January 1, 2001
for certain key employees. The SERP is a nonqualified plan under
which the Company makes quarterly contributions that are
intended to provide a retirement benefit that is a fixed
percentage of a participants estimated final five-year
average annual salary, up to a maximum of 65%. Company
contributions and investment earnings on the contributions are
tax-deferred and accumulate as a retirement fund. Employees do
not make contributions under this plan. A portion of the Company
contributions and investment earnings thereon vests after three
years of SERP participation and the remaining portion vests
after both five years of SERP participation and 10 years of
continuous service. The plan provides for defined contributions
and the amount of the benefit is not guaranteed. |
14
|
|
(G) |
Pursuant to the Companys 2001 option exchange program,
Messrs. Lanni and Baldwin surrendered options for
300,000 shares and 800,000 shares, respectively, and
received grants of replacement options for 270,000 shares
and 720,000 shares, respectively; the other Named
Executives did not participate in the program. |
Aggregated Option Exercises in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal
Year-End Option Values
The following table sets forth option exercises and year-end
value tables for the Named Executives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options at | |
|
In-the-Money Options at | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004(A) | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value | |
|
| |
|
| |
Name |
|
Exercise (#) | |
|
Realized ($) | |
|
Exercisable (#) | |
|
Unexercisable (#) | |
|
Exercisable ($) | |
|
Unexercisable ($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
J. Terrence Lanni
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
15,569,670 |
|
|
|
410,000 |
|
|
|
560,000 |
|
|
|
17,035,700 |
|
|
|
26,465,600 |
|
Robert H. Baldwin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
840,000 |
|
|
|
480,000 |
|
|
|
33,456,000 |
|
|
|
22,684,800 |
|
John T. Redmond
|
|
|
445,000 |
|
|
|
9,391,152 |
|
|
|
308,338 |
|
|
|
437,500 |
|
|
|
14,615,099 |
|
|
|
20,413,000 |
|
James J. Murren
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
6,734,378 |
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
46,749,250 |
|
|
|
19,904,000 |
|
Gary N. Jacobs
|
|
|
131,100 |
|
|
|
2,583,335 |
|
|
|
428,900 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
16,910,455 |
|
|
|
11,342,400 |
|
|
|
(A) |
Based upon the market value of the underlying securities at
December 31, 2004 of $72.74, minus the exercise price of
in-the-money options. |
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
to be Issued Upon | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Remaining Available | |
|
|
Exercise of Outstanding | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
for Future Issuance | |
|
|
Options, Warrants | |
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
Under Equity | |
Plan Category |
|
and Rights | |
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Compensation Plans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
15,365,000 |
|
|
$ |
28.31 |
|
|
|
2,229,000 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
In May 2002, the Board of Directors approved a restricted stock
plan, not approved by security holders, under which
903,000 shares were issued and 855,000 remained outstanding
at December 31, 2004. In November 2002, the Board of
Directors determined that no more restricted stock awards would
be granted under such plan. |
COMPENSATION AND STOCK OPTION COMMITTEE
REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Policies
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of
Directors is responsible for establishing, monitoring and
implementing the policies governing the compensation of the
Companys executives. During 2004, the Committee was
comprised of the three Directors whose names appear at the
bottom of this report. These policies may be summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
1. The Companys compensation programs should be
effective in attracting, motivating and retaining key executives; |
|
|
2. There should be a correlation between the compensation
awarded to an executive, the performance of the Company as a
whole, and the executives individual performance; and |
15
|
|
|
3. The Companys compensation programs should provide
the executives with a financial interest in the Company similar
to the interests of the Companys stockholders. |
During 2004, the Companys executives were eligible to be
compensated through a combination of salary, performance bonuses
and long-term incentive arrangements (where appropriate), and
grants of stock options under the Companys Nonqualified
Stock Option Plan and Incentive Stock Option Plan. The annual
salaries of the executives are reviewed from time to time and
adjustments are made where necessary in order for the salaries
of the Companys executives to be competitive with the
salaries paid by companies included in the Dow Jones U.S.
Gambling Index (the Casinos Group).
Performance bonuses, where appropriate, are usually determined
after the end of the Companys fiscal year based on an
assessment of the Companys results and the level of an
individuals particular performance for that year.
Long-term incentive arrangements, on a case-by-case basis, may
be determined as part of an overall compensation package in
conjunction with demonstrable enhancements to stockholder
values. The Company did not enter into any long-term incentive
arrangement with any executives in 2004.
The Companys Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan for
Executive Officers (the Incentive Plan) provides for
performance-based bonuses for executives who are covered
employees under Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code. Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax
deduction to public companies for compensation over
$1 million paid to any such companys chief executive
officer and four other most highly compensated executive
officers. Qualifying performance-based compensation will not be
subject to the deduction limitation if certain requirements are
met. The Compensation and Stock Option Committee based the
performance measure in 2004 on achievement by the Company of
pretax income excluding extraordinary items and certain
non-extraordinary items, including but not limited to gains or
losses from disposal of an operation or sale of assets, certain
write-downs or write-offs and material accounting changes. The
actual bonus awards, if any, under the Incentive Plan are
determined by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee,
provided that pursuant to the Incentive Plan, no bonus award may
exceed $5,000,000.
The minimum performance goals set by the Compensation and Stock
Option Committee for 2004 were exceeded, and accordingly, the
Companys senior executives qualified for bonuses for 2004
under the Incentive Plan. Based upon the factors and
compensation policies discussed above, the Compensation and
Stock Option Committee determined, in 2005, to grant bonuses for
2004 to the Named Executives pursuant to the Incentive Plan as
follows: Mr. Lanni, $3,393,553; Mr. Baldwin,
$2,542,327; Mr. Redmond, $2,201,837; Mr. Murren,
$2,031,592; and Mr. Jacobs, $1,180,366.
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee believes that a
significant component of the compensation paid to the
Companys executives over the long term should be derived
from stock options or other forms of stock compensation. The
Committee strongly believes that stock ownership in the Company
is a valuable incentive to executives and that the grant of
stock options or other forms of stock compensation to them
serves to align their interests with the interests of the
stockholders as a whole and encourages them to manage the
Company for the long term. The Compensation and Stock Option
Committee determines whether to grant stock options or other
forms of stock compensation, as well as the amount of the
grants, by taking into account, in the following order of
importance, the individuals past and prospective value to
the Company, the performance of the proposed recipient (based
upon evaluations by the executives superior or the Board
of Directors) and the amount of stock compensation previously
granted. The Committee determined that the Named Executives had
adequate stock incentives in 2004 and, therefore, did not grant
them any stock options.
Compensation Awarded to the Chief Executive Officer
J. Terrence Lanni served as Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company from July 1995 through December
1999, at which time he resigned as Chief Executive Officer but
remained as Chairman of the Board in a non-executive officer
capacity. Effective February 2000, Mr. Lanni resumed his
full-time executive officer status with the Company, retaining
the title of Chairman of the Board. Effective March 2001,
Mr. Lanni reassumed the title of Chief Executive Officer of
the Company. As a result of its periodic review of compensation
paid by companies in the Casinos Group and in order to realize
the benefits of continuity and stability from the Companys
successful management team by securing their long-term
16
services, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee approved,
effective June 2002, an extension of the term of
Mr. Lannis employment contract from May 2004 to
July 3, 2006 and an increase in his annual base salary from
$1,000,000 to $2,000,000.
As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Lanni was eligible in 2004
to participate in the same executive compensation plans
available to the Companys other senior executives,
including the Incentive Plan, the Stock Option Plans and the
Restricted Stock Plan. The performance measure for the Incentive
Plan in 2004 was based upon achievement by the Company of pretax
income, as described above. The Compensation and Stock Option
Committee determined in 2005 to grant a bonus of $3,393,553 to
Mr. Lanni for 2004 pursuant to the Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
JAMES D. ALJIAN, Chairman |
|
RONALD M. POPEIL |
|
MELVIN B. WOLZINGER |
The foregoing report of the Compensation and Stock Option
Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not
be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other
Company filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates such
report by reference therein.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the Audit
Committee) consists of Mr. Hernandez (Chair),
Mr. Davis and Ms. Herman. The Board of Directors has
determined that Messrs. Hernandez and Davis and
Ms. Herman meet the current independence and experience
requirements of the Exchanges listing standards.
The Audit Committees responsibilities are described in a
written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, a copy of
which, as amended and restated, is attached hereto as
Appendix B and posted on the Companys website at
www.mgmmirage.com under the caption Investor
Relations-Corporate Governance-Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee is responsible for providing independent, objective
oversight of the Companys financial reporting system.
Amongst its various activities, the Audit Committee reviews:
|
|
|
|
1. |
The adequacy of the Companys internal controls and
financial reporting process and the reliability of the
Companys financial statements; |
|
|
2. |
The independence and performance of the Companys internal
auditors and independent accountants; and |
|
|
3. |
The Companys compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements. |
The Audit Committee meets regularly in open sessions with the
Companys management, independent accountants and internal
auditors to consider the adequacy of the Companys internal
controls and the objectivity of its financial reporting. In
addition, the Audit Committee meets regularly in closed sessions
with the Companys management, independent accountants and
internal auditors to review the foregoing matters. The Audit
Committee also recommends to the Board of Directors the
appointment of the independent accountants, and periodically
reviews their performance and independence from management.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial
statements with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, and
management represented to the Audit Committee that the
Companys consolidated financial statements were prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The
discussions with Deloitte & Touche LLP also included the
matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61
(communication with Audit Committees), as well as the written
disclosures and delivery of the letter regarding its
independence as required by Independence Standards Board
Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit
Committees).
The Audit Committee also: (i) reviewed and discussed with
management, the Companys internal auditors and Deloitte
& Touche LLP the Companys internal control over its
financial reporting process;
17
(ii) monitored managements review and analysis of the
adequacy and effectiveness of those controls and processes; and
(iii) reviewed and discussed with management and Deloitte
& Touche LLP their respective assessment of the
effectiveness and adequacy of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
Based on the Audit Committees review of the audited
financial statements and the review and discussions described in
the foregoing paragraphs, the Audit Committee recommended to the
Board of Directors that the audited financial statements for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 be included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 for filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
ROLAND HERNANDEZ, Chairman |
|
WILLIE D. DAVIS |
|
ALEXIS HERMAN |
The foregoing report of the Audit Committee does not
constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or
incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the
Company specifically incorporates such report by reference
therein.
18
STOCKHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE PRESENTATION
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage
change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the
Companys Common Stock against the cumulative total return
of the Dow Jones US Equity Market Index and the Dow Jones US
Gambling Index for the five-year period which commenced
December 31, 1999 and ended December 31, 2004.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG MGM MIRAGE, THE DOW JONES US EQUITY MARKET INDEX
AND THE DOW JONES US GAMBLING INDEX
|
|
* |
$100 invested on 12/31/99 in stock or index-including
reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Cumulative Total Return | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/99 | |
|
12/00 | |
|
12/01 | |
|
12/02 | |
|
12/03 | |
|
12/04 | |
| |
MGM MIRAGE
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
112.31 |
|
|
|
115.03 |
|
|
|
131.37 |
|
|
|
149.85 |
|
|
|
289.83 |
|
DOW JONES US EQUITY MARKET
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
90.73 |
|
|
|
79.92 |
|
|
|
62.27 |
|
|
|
81.42 |
|
|
|
91.20 |
|
DOW JONES US GAMBLING
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
109.34 |
|
|
|
120.49 |
|
|
|
132.59 |
|
|
|
205.04 |
|
|
|
272.89 |
|
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
On June 2, 2002, the Company entered into a new employment
agreement with J. Terrence Lanni, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The new employment
agreement extended the term of Mr. Lannis prior
employment agreement from May 2004 to July 3, 2006 and
increased Mr. Lannis minimum annual salary from
$1,000,000 to $2,000,000. The Company may terminate the
agreement for good cause (as defined). In such event, Mr.Lanni
shall be entitled to exercise those of his stock options granted
under the Companys Nonqualified Stock Option Plan as had
been vested but were
19
unexercised as of the date of termination and to retain only
those shares of restricted stock granted under the
Companys Restricted Stock Plan as had been vested as of
the date of termination. If the agreement is terminated as a
result of death or disability, Mr. Lanni (or his
beneficiary) will be entitled to exercise those of his
unexercised options as would have been vested as of the first
anniversary of the date of termination, and all shares of
restricted stock shall immediately vest. Also, pursuant to the
agreement, if the Company terminates the agreement for other
than good cause (as defined), Mr. Lannis salary will
continue for the term of the agreement, he will continue to
receive certain employee benefits, and all unvested stock
options and unvested restricted stock held will continue to vest
for the remainder of the term of the agreement. If
Mr. Lanni seeks to terminate the agreement for good cause,
he must give the Company 30 days notice to cure the breach.
If such breach is not cured (and the Company does not invoke its
right to arbitration), Mr. Lannis salary will
continue for the term of the agreement, he will continue to
receive certain employee benefits, and all unvested stock
options and unvested restricted stock held will continue to vest
for the remainder of the term of the agreement. If
Mr. Lanni terminates without cause upon 30 days
notice, then termination will result and Mr. Lanni shall be
entitled to exercise those of his stock options granted under
the Companys Nonqualified Stock Option Plan as had been
vested but were unexercised as of the date of termination and to
retain only those shares of restricted stock granted under the
Companys Restricted Stock Plan as had been vested as of
the date of termination. If there is a Change in Control (as
defined) of the Company, all of Mr. Lannis unvested
stock options and unvested restricted stock become fully vested.
If the Change in Control results from an exchange of outstanding
Common Stock as a result of which the Common Stock of the
Company is no longer publicly held, then the options held by
Mr. Lanni shall be exercisable for the consideration (cash,
stock or otherwise) which the holders of the Companys
Common Stock received in such exchange, and the Company shall
offer to purchase Mr. Lannis restricted stock upon
the same terms and conditions as provided to the Company in the
tender offer (see Executive Compensation and Other
Information-Aggregated Option Exercises in Fiscal 2004 and
Fiscal Year-End Option Values and Compensation and
Stock Option Committee Report on Executive Compensation).
On June 2, 2002, the Company entered into a new employment
agreement with Robert H. Baldwin, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Mirage Resorts, the Companys wholly owned
subsidiary. The new employment agreement extended the term of
Mr. Baldwins prior employment agreement from May 2004
to July 3, 2006 and increased Mr. Baldwins
minimum annual salary from $1,000,000 to $1,500,000. The Company
may terminate the agreement for good cause (as defined). In such
event, Mr. Baldwin shall be entitled to exercise those of
his stock options granted under the Companys Nonqualified
Stock Option Plan as had been vested but were unexercised as of
the date of termination and to retain only those shares of
restricted stock granted under the Companys Restricted
Stock Plan as had been vested as of the date of termination. If
the agreement is terminated as a result of death or disability,
Mr. Baldwin (or his beneficiary) will be entitled to
exercise those of his unexercised options as would have been
vested as of the first anniversary of the date of termination,
and all shares of restricted stock shall immediately vest. Also,
pursuant to the agreement, if the Company terminates the
agreement for other than good cause (as defined),
Mr. Baldwins salary will continue for the term of the
agreement, he will continue to receive certain employee
benefits, and all unvested stock options and unvested restricted
stock held will continue to vest for the remainder of the term
of the agreement. If Mr. Baldwin seeks to terminate the
agreement for good cause, he must give the Company 30 days
notice to cure the breach. If such breach is not cured (and the
Company does not invoke its right to arbitration),
Mr. Baldwins salary will continue for the term of the
agreement, he will continue to receive certain employee
benefits, and all unvested stock options held will continue to
vest for the remainder of the term of the agreement. If
Mr. Baldwin terminates without cause upon 30 days
notice, then termination will result and Mr. Baldwin shall
be entitled to exercise those of his stock options granted under
the Companys Nonqualified Stock Option Plan as had been
vested but were unexercised as of the date of termination and to
retain only those shares of restricted stock granted under the
Companys Restricted Stock Plan as had been vested as of
the date of termination. If there is a Change in Control (as
defined) of the Company, all of Mr. Baldwins unvested
stock options and unvested restricted stock become fully vested.
If the Change in Control results from an exchange of outstanding
Common Stock as a result of which the Common Stock of the
Company is no longer publicly held, then the options held by
Mr. Baldwin shall be exercisable for the consideration
(cash, stock or otherwise) which the holders of the
Companys Common Stock received in such exchange, and the
20
Company shall offer to purchase Mr. Baldwins
restricted stock upon the same terms and conditions as provided
to the Company in the tender offer (see Executive
Compensation and Other Information-Aggregated Option Exercises
in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal Year-End Option Values and
Compensation and Stock Option Committee Report on
Executive Compensation).
On June 2, 2002, the Company entered into a new employment
agreement with John T. Redmond, President and Chief Executive
Officer of MGM Grand Resorts, the Companys wholly owned
subsidiary. The new employment agreement extended the term of
Mr. Redmonds prior employment agreement from May 2004
to July 3, 2006 and increased Mr. Redmonds
minimum annual salary from $800,000 to $1,300,000. The Company
may terminate the agreement for good cause (as defined). In such
event, Mr. Redmond shall be entitled to exercise those of
his stock options granted under the Companys Nonqualified
Stock Option Plan as had been vested but were unexercised as of
the date of termination and to retain only those shares of
restricted stock granted under the Companys Restricted
Stock Plan as had been vested as of the date of termination. If
the agreement is terminated as a result of death or disability,
Mr. Redmond (or his beneficiary) will be entitled to
exercise those of his unexercised options as would have been
vested as of the first anniversary of the date of termination,
and all shares of restricted stock shall immediately vest. Also,
pursuant to the agreement, if the Company terminates the
agreement for other than good cause (as defined),
Mr. Redmonds salary will continue for the term of the
agreement, he will continue to receive certain employee
benefits, and all unvested stock options and unvested restricted
stock held will continue to vest for the remaining term of the
agreement. If Mr. Redmond seeks to terminate the agreement
for good cause, he must give the Company 30 days notice to
cure the breach. If such breach is not cured (and the Company
does not invoke its right to arbitration),
Mr. Redmonds salary will continue for the term of the
agreement, he will continue to receive certain employee
benefits, and all unvested stock options and unvested restricted
stock held will continue to vest for the remainder of the term
of the agreement. If Mr. Redmond terminates without cause
upon 30 days notice, then termination will result and
Mr. Redmond shall be entitled to exercise those of his
stock options granted under the Companys Nonqualified
Stock Option Plan as had been vested but were unexercised as of
the date of termination and to retain only those shares of
restricted stock granted under the Companys Restricted
Stock Plan as had been vested as of the date of termination. If
there is a Change in Control (as defined) of the Company, all of
Mr. Redmonds unvested stock options and unvested
restricted stock become fully vested. If the Change in Control
results from an exchange of outstanding Common Stock as a result
of which the Common Stock of the Company is no longer publicly
held, then the options held by Mr. Redmond shall be
exercisable for the consideration (cash, stock or otherwise)
which the holders of the Companys Common Stock received in
such exchange, and the Company shall offer to purchase
Mr. Redmonds restricted stock upon the same terms and
conditions as provided to the Company in the tender offer (see
Executive Compensation and Other Information-Aggregated
Option Exercises in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal Year-End Option
Values and Compensation and Stock Option Committee
Report on Executive Compensation).
On June 2, 2002, the Company entered into a new employment
agreement with James J. Murren, President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of the Company. The new employment
agreement extended the term of Mr. Murrens prior
employment agreement from May 2004 to July 3, 2006 and
increased Mr. Murrens minimum annual salary from
$800,000 to $1,200,000. The Company may terminate the agreement
for good cause (as defined). In such event, Mr. Murren
shall be entitled to exercise those of his stock options granted
under the Companys Nonqualified Stock Option Plan as had
been vested but were unexercised as of the date of termination
and to retain only those shares of restricted stock granted
under the Companys Restricted Stock Plan as had been
vested as of the date of termination. If the agreement is
terminated as a result of death or disability, Mr. Murren
(or his beneficiary) will be entitled to exercise those of his
unexercised options as would have been vested as of the first
anniversary of the date of termination, and all shares of
restricted stock shall immediately vest. Also, pursuant to the
agreement, if the Company terminates the agreement without good
cause (as defined), Mr. Murrens salary will continue
for the term of the agreement, he will continue to receive
certain employee benefits and all unvested stock options and
unvested restricted stock held will continue to vest for the
remaining term of the agreement. If Mr. Murren seeks to
terminate the agreement for good cause, he must give the Company
30 days notice to cure the breach. If such breach is not
cured (and the Company does not invoke its right to
arbitration), Mr. Murrens salary will continue for
the term of the agreement, he will continue to receive certain
employee benefits, and all
21
unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock held will
continue to vest for the remainder of the term of the agreement.
If Mr. Murren terminates without cause upon 30 days
notice, then termination will result and Mr. Murren shall
be entitled to exercise those of his stock options granted under
the Companys Nonqualified Stock Option Plan as had been
vested but were unexercised as of the date of termination and to
retain only those shares of restricted stock granted under the
Companys Restricted Stock Plan as had been vested as of
the date of termination. If there is a Change in Control of the
Company (as defined), all of Mr. Murrens unvested
stock options and unvested restricted stock become fully vested.
If the Change in Control results from an exchange of outstanding
Common Stock as a result of which the Common Stock of the
Company is no longer publicly held, then the options held by
Mr. Murren to purchase Common Stock of the Company shall be
exercisable for the consideration (cash, stock or otherwise)
which the holders of the Companys Common Stock received in
such exchange, and the Company shall offer to purchase
Mr. Murrens restricted stock upon the same terms and
conditions as provided to the Company in the tender offer (see
Executive Compensation and Other Information-Aggregated
Option Exercises in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal Year-End Option
Values and Compensation and Stock Option Committee
Report on Executive Compensation).
On June 2, 2002, the Company entered into a new employment
agreement with Gary N. Jacobs, Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary of the Company. The new employment
agreement extended the term of Mr. Jacobs prior
employment agreement from May 2004 to July 3, 2006 and
increased Mr. Jacobs minimum annual salary then in
effect from $550,000 to $700,000. The Company may terminate the
agreement for good cause (as defined). In such event,
Mr. Jacobs shall be entitled to exercise those of his stock
options granted under the Companys Nonqualified Stock
Option Plan as had been vested but were unexercised as of the
date of termination and to retain only those shares of
restricted stock granted under the Companys Restricted
Stock Plan as had been vested as of the date of termination. If
the agreement is terminated as a result of death or disability,
Mr. Jacobs (or his beneficiary) will be entitled to
exercise those of his unexercised options as would have been
vested as of the first anniversary of the date of termination,
and all shares of restricted stock shall immediately vest. Also,
pursuant to the agreement, if the Company terminates the
agreement for other than good cause (as defined),
Mr. Jacobs salary will continue for the term of the
agreement, he will continue to receive certain employee
benefits, and all unvested stock options and unvested restricted
stock held will continue to vest for the remainder of the term
of the agreement. If Mr. Jacobs seeks to terminate the
agreement for good cause, he must give the Company 30 days
notice to cure the breach. If such breach is not cured (and the
Company does not invoke its right to arbitration),
Mr. Jacobs salary will continue for the term of the
agreement, he will continue to receive certain employee
benefits, and all unvested stock options and unvested restricted
stock held will continue to vest for the remainder of the term
of the agreement. If Mr. Jacobs terminates without cause
upon 30 days notice, then termination will result and
Mr. Jacobs shall be entitled to exercise those of his stock
options granted under the Companys Nonqualified Stock
Option Plan as had been vested but were unexercised as of the
date of termination and to retain only those shares of
restricted stock granted under the Companys Restricted
Stock Plan as had been vested as of the date of termination. If
there is a Change in Control (as defined) of the Company, all of
Mr. Jacobs unvested stock options and unvested
restricted stock become fully vested. If the Change in Control
results from an exchange of outstanding Common Stock as a result
of which the Common Stock of the Company is no longer publicly
held, then the options held by Mr. Jacobs shall be
exercisable for the consideration (cash, stock or otherwise)
which the holders of the Companys Common Stock received in
such exchange, and the Company shall offer to purchase
Mr. Jacobs restricted stock upon the same terms and
conditions as provided to the Company in the tender offer (see
Executive Compensation and Other Information-Aggregated
Option Exercises in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal Year-End Option
Values and Compensation and Stock Option Committee
Report on Executive Compensation).
Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro,
LLP, a law firm of which Terry Christensen, a member of the
Board of Directors of the Company, is a partner and Gary N.
Jacobs, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
and a director of the Company, is of counsel (see Election
of Directors), has performed extensive legal services for
the Company. Such services rendered relate to litigation, sales
of securities, financing transactions, acquisitions and
dispositions of certain assets and operations, tax matters and
other business transactions, contracts and agreements. In 2004,
the Company paid legal fees to Christensen, Miller, Fink,
Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, LLP in the amount of
$3,404,108. In
22
2004, Gary N. Jacobs received $62,626 from Christensen, Miller,
Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, LLP, which payment was
related to participation in fees received from clients unrelated
to the Company. Mr. Jacobs had been a senior partner of the
firm, and left that position on becoming employed by the
Company. He continues with the law firm in an of counsel
capacity. The foregoing payment was a fixed contractual
obligation of the law firm, and was payable without regard to
any legal services rendered to the Company.
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. (Bear Stearns), an
investment banking and brokerage firm of which George J. Mason,
a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, is Senior
Managing Director, serves as a broker of record to MFS
Investment Management (MFS), the administrator of
certain of the Companys benefit plans, including the
Companys 401K Plan, the SERP and the DCP. In connection
with those services, Bear Stearns was paid by MFS, and in turn
paid to Mr. Mason, approximately $216,706 in broker of
record compensation for the 401K Plan in 2004.
During 2004, Alexander M. Haig, Jr., a member of the Board of
Directors of the Company, rendered consulting services to the
Company, for which he received a fee of $50,000.
Robert H. Baldwin, a director of the Company, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Mirage Resorts, Incorporated and
President of Project CC, LLC, is a director of the Keep
Memory Alive Foundation. In 2004, the Company made a
contribution of cash, goods and services to the Keep Memory
Alive Foundation in the aggregate amount of approximately
$186,000, and the Keep Memory Alive Foundation purchased goods
and services from the Company and its subsidiaries in the amount
of approximately $219,000.
James J. Murren, President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer and a director of the Company, was a founder of and
currently serves as a Director of the Nevada Cancer Institute, a
non-profit organization. Gary N. Jacobs, Executive Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary and a Director of the
Company, serves as a Director of the Nevada Cancer Institute,
and Mr. Murrens wife, Heather Hay Murren, serves as a
Director and the President of the Nevada Cancer Institute. In
2004, the Company made cash contributions to the Nevada Cancer
Institute in the amount of approximately $36,000, and the Nevada
Cancer Institute purchased goods and services from the Company
and its subsidiaries in the amount of approximately $68,000.
In 1997, the Compensation Committee adopted a stock option grant
program pursuant to the Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, which
was subsequently approved by the stockholders, whereby members
of the Companys Board of Directors who are not full-time
employees of the Company would receive an initial grant
(adjusted to reflect the effect of the Companys
February 10, 2000 two-for-one stock split) of 10,000 stock
options, and subsequent yearly grants of 2,000 stock options
during their respective terms as directors. Effective
July 1, 2000, the annual grants were increased to 5,000
stock options during their respective terms as directors.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, the Company
rented office space from Tracinda for various business purposes.
The aggregate amount of rental which was paid by the Company to
Tracinda in 2004 was approximately $26,000, which management
believes to be at rates generally comparable to those offered to
third parties.
Certain affiliates of the Company, including MGM Grand Hotel,
LLC, purchase on a wholesale basis from MGM Inc., videocassettes
and other merchandise such as baseball caps, clothing, key
chains and watches bearing the trademarks and logos of MGM Inc.
for resale to consumers in retail shops located within MGM
MIRAGE-affiliated hotels. For the year ended December 31,
2004, there were no material purchases of such merchandise by
the Company from MGM Inc. Hotel affiliates of MGM MIRAGE
occasionally conduct cross-promotional campaigns with MGM, in
which MGM MIRAGEs hotel affiliates and MGM Inc.s
motion picture releases are promoted together; however,
management believes that the amounts involved are immaterial.
MGM MIRAGE and its hotel affiliates and MGM Inc. have an ongoing
relationship whereby the MGM MIRAGE hotel affiliates can utilize
key art, still photographs of artwork and one-minute film clips
from certain of MGM Inc.s motion picture releases on an
as-needed basis. MGM MIRAGE and its hotel affiliates do not pay
any monetary compensation for these licenses.
23
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, MGM Inc.
paid the Company the aggregate amount of approximately $207,000
for hotel services, and Tracinda paid the Company the aggregate
amount of approximately $9,000 for hotel services and $26,000
for usage of the Companys aircraft. The rates charged by
the Company for hotel services were generally comparable to
those offered to third parties, and the rates charged by the
Company for usage of its aircraft were mandated by Federal
Aviation Administration regulations. In addition, Mr. Kirk
Kerkorian, the sole stockholder of Tracinda, and Mr. Alex
Yemenidjian, the Chief Executive Officer of MGM Inc., paid the
Company the aggregate amount of approximately $47,000, and
$36,000, respectively for hotel services provided by the
Company. In 2004, Mr. Yemenidjian participated in the
Companys executive health plan which reimburses
Mr. Yemenidjian for his medical expenses.
Mr. Yemenidjian reimbursed the Company for his
participation in such executive health plan according to the
Companys applicable rate structure. In addition, in
2004,the Company paid Mr. Yemenidjians secretary the
sum of $6,000. Tracinda also leases office space from MGM
MIRAGEs hotel affiliates, and in 2004, Tracinda paid the
Company approximately $5,000 for rent for such office space.
In February 1980, a predecessor-in-interest of MGM Inc. granted
to our predecessor-in-interest an exclusive open-ended
royalty-free license to use the trademark MGM, as well as
certain stylized lion depictions, in its resort hotel and/or
gaming and other businesses, excluding the filmed entertainment
business. This license was amended in 1998. In June 2000, the
license was further amended to allow MGM MIRAGE to use the
trademark MGM in combination with the trademark MIRAGE to the
same extent that we were previously permitted with regard to the
MGM Grand trademark. In consideration of this further grant of
rights, we paid MGM Inc. an annual license fee of
$1 million. Beginning in the Fall of 2003, we entered into
discussions with MGM Inc. to clarify certain terms of the
license and to separate ownership of the MGM MIRAGE trademarks
from the trademarks of MGM Inc. In May 2004, we entered into a
Trademark Coexistence and Assignment Agreement with MGM Inc.
pursuant to which the MGM Grand trademarks were assigned to us
in exchange for a broadening of the category of goods and
services for which MGM Inc. has exclusivity with regard to the
use of the trademark MGM (and derivatives thereof). This
agreement replaces and supersedes the previous license (as
amended), but maintains (in a separate license agreement) all of
the terms and conditions (including the $1 million annual
payment) of the June 2000 amendment described above. We paid MGM
Inc. the $1 million annual license fee in June 2004
pursuant to this new license agreement.
Pursuant to a Merchandise License Agreement effective as of
December 1, 2000 between MGM Inc. and a subsidiary of the
Company, the Company has the right to use certain trademarks and
logos of MGM Inc. in connection with the retail sale of
merchandise at the Companys properties. The Company is
required to pay MGM Inc. royalties based on retail sales of the
licensed merchandise. The agreement has a term of five years,
subject to the Companys right to extend the term for one
additional five-year period and its option to terminate the
agreement at any time upon 60 days notice. In 2004,
the Company paid no royalties to MGM Inc. pursuant to this
Merchandise License Agreement. The amount of royalties that will
become payable in 2005 and future years cannot be determined at
this time.
AMENDMENT OF OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
Proposal No. 2
Our board of directors has approved a proposal to amend our
certificate of incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of our common stock from 300,000,000 to
600,000,000. The complete text of the certificate of amendment
for the increase in authorized shares is set forth in
Appendix A to this proxy statement and is incorporated by
this reference. The proposed amendment would amend
Article 4 of our certificate of incorporation to read as
follows:
|
|
|
|
The aggregate number of shares which the corporation shall
have the authority to issue is 600,000,000 shares, all of which
are to be common stock, and the par value of each of such shares
is to be $0.01. |
|
On March 8, 2005, our Board approved a 2-for-1 stock split
to be effected in the form of a stock dividend. The proposed
amendment to the certificate of incorporation is designed to
effect the stock split and to ensure
24
that, after giving effect to the stock split, we will have
enough authorized shares of common stock to allow for other
future issuances of our common stock at such time and for such
general corporate purposes as our board of directors may deem
advisable. Any such issuances may occur without further action
by our stockholders, except as may be required by applicable law
or by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange where our common
stock is listed for trading. Upon issuance, any such shares will
have the same rights as the outstanding shares of common stock.
Holders of our common stock have no preemptive rights. The
issuance of additional shares of common stock may have a
dilutive effect on earnings per share and on such
stockholders percentage voting power for persons who do
not purchase additional shares to maintain their pro rata
interest.
We have no arrangements, agreements, understandings or plans at
the present time for the issuance or use of the additional
shares of common stock proposed to be authorized except in
connection with the stock split and the possible exercise of
outstanding options and the grant of additional share based
instruments under our stock option plans or other long term
incentive plans. We do not intend to issue any common stock
except on terms which we deem to be in the best interests of MGM
MIRAGE and our stockholders.
Although we have no present intention to issue shares of common
stock other than in connection with the stock split or
outstanding options, future issuances of common stock could have
the effect of making the acquisition of control of MGM MIRAGE
more difficult. Common stock could also be privately placed with
purchasers who might side with management in opposing a takeover
bid, thus discouraging such a bid.
We believe the stock split is desirable for several reasons. Our
common stock has been trading at a per share price in the $49.15
to $79.60 range since October 1, 2004. As of March 14,
2005, the closing price of our common stock was $73.81. We
believe that this price range makes our common stock less
affordable for purchase in lots of 100 or more shares. In
addition, we believe an increase in the number of shares held by
the public will encourage and facilitate trades in our common
stock and promote a more liquid market in our common stock.
Since the two-for-one stock split will increase the number of
shares held in the public market, we believe that the price per
share of our common stock will be more affordable to individual
investors and, as a result, enable more people to buy our common
stock and create more liquidity in each stockholders
investment. We cannot be certain that these effects will occur.
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Stock
Split. The following is a brief summary of certain U.S.
federal income tax consequences of the stock split based upon
current federal tax law:
|
|
|
1. No gain or loss will be recognized by MGM MIRAGE as a
result of the stock split. |
|
|
2. No gain or loss will be recognized by a stockholder of
MGM MIRAGE as a result of the stock split. |
|
|
3. The stockholders tax basis for each new share and
each retained share of MGM MIRAGE common stock will be allocated
between the new shares and the retained shares in proportion to
the fair market values of each on the date of distribution. |
|
|
4. The stockholders holding period of the additional
shares of MGM MIRAGE common stock received in the stock split
will be the same as the stockholders holding period of the
retained shares of MGM MIRAGE common stock. |
This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code, existing
and proposed Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder,
administrative pronouncements and judicial decisions, all as in
effect on the date hereof, and all of which are subject to
change, possibly on a retroactive basis. Any such change could
affect the continuing validity of this discussion. This
discussion does not address the effect of any applicable state,
local or foreign tax laws. The foregoing summary does not
purport to be a complete analysis of all potential tax effects
of the stock split. Each MGM MIRAGE stockholder is urged to
consult with his or her own tax advisor to determine the
particular tax consequences to such stockholder of the stock
split, including the applicability and effect of state, local
and foreign tax laws and the possible effects of any changes in
U.S. federal or other applicable tax laws.
25
We believe that it is in our best interests and that of our
stockholders to increase the number of authorized shares of
common stock in order to have additional authorized but unissued
shares available for issuance to effectuate the stock split and
to meet business needs as they arise.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR adoption of this
proposal.
APPROVAL OF MGM MIRAGE 2005 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
Proposal No. 3
A copy of the proposed 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan (which we
refer to as the 2005 Plan) is attached to this proxy statement
as Appendix C and is hereby incorporated by reference. The
following summary of key provisions of the 2005 Plan is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the attached 2005 Plan
document. Based upon the recommendation of the Boards
Compensation and Stock Option Committee (which we refer to as
the Committee), the Board of Directors has approved the form of
the 2005 Plan and has recommended that it be submitted to the
stockholders at the Annual Meeting for their approval.
Purpose. We believe that while the Companys
existing 1997 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan and 1997 Incentive
Stock Option Plan (which we refer to collectively as the Old
Plan) have provided the Company with a useful tool in helping to
attract and retain qualified executive personnel, the Old Plan
does not provide the Company with the flexibility it will need
in the future to continue to perform this function to the
fullest extent. Upon approval of the 2005 Plan, the Old Plan
will be terminated although outstanding options under the Old
Plan will remain in effect in accordance with their terms.
The 2005 Plan is designed to advance the interests of the
Company and its stockholders by providing key management
employees, non-employee directors and other eligible
participants with innovative financial incentives, through stock
and performance based awards, to: align participants
interests with the interests of the Companys stockholders
in the long-term success of the Company; provide management with
an equity ownership in the Company tied to Company performance;
attract, motivate and retain key employees and non-employee
directors; and provide incentive to management for continuous
employment with the Company.
Effective Date and Term. The 2005 Plan will be
effective May 3, 2005 if approved by the stockholders at
the Annual Meeting. The 2005 Plan will terminate on the earlier
of the date that all shares reserved for issuance have been
awarded or May 3, 2015.
Administration and Eligibility. The Committee will
administer the 2005 Plan. Among other powers, the Committee will
have full and exclusive power to: interpret the terms and the
intent of the 2005 Plan and any award agreement; determine
eligibility for awards; determine award recipients; establish
the amount and type of award; determine the fair market value of
Company common stock; determine the terms and conditions of
awards; grant awards; and make all other determinations relating
to the 2005 Plan.
The Committee may delegate to one or more of its members, agents
or advisors or to one or more officers of the Company, its
subsidiaries or affiliates such administrative duties or powers
as it may deem advisable. The Committee may authorize one or
more of the Companys officers to designate employees to be
recipients of awards and/or determine the size of any such
award; provided that (i) the Committee may not delegate
such authority with respect to awards to be granted to an
officer or other directors of the Company or a person who
beneficially owns more that ten percent of the Companys
common stock, (ii) the authorizing resolution of the
Committee must state the total number of awards that may be so
granted; and (iii) the officer must report periodically to
the Committee about the nature and scope of the awards granted.
All officers, directors and employees are eligible to
participate in the 2005 Plan. Subject to the provisions of the
2005 Plan, the Committee has the authority to select from all
eligible individuals those to whom awards are granted and to
determine the nature and amount of each award. As of
December 31, 2004, there were ten executive officers,
17 directors (of whom five were executive officers and 12 were
non-employee directors) and approximately 40,000 employees
(including officers who are not executive officers) who would
have been eligible to participate in the 2005 Plan.
26
Types of Awards
General. The 2005 Plan permits the Committee, in its sole
discretion, to grant various forms of incentive awards. The
Committee has the power to grant stock options, stock
appreciation rights (which we refer to as SARs), restricted
stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance
units and other stock based awards. Each award will be reflected
in an agreement between the Company and the participant, will be
subject to the applicable terms and conditions of the 2005 Plan
and may also be subject to other terms and conditions consistent
with the 2005 Plan that the Committee deems appropriate,
including accelerated vesting or settlement in the event of a
participants death, disability or termination of
employment. The provisions of the various agreements entered
into under the 2005 Plan do not need to be identical.
Stock Options. Stock options allow the participant to buy
a certain number of shares of the Companys common stock at
an exercise price equal to at least the fair market value (as
determined by the Committee) on the date the option is granted.
Stock Options may be incentive stock options intended to qualify
for special tax treatment or nonqualified stock options.
Specific terms of the option will be set by the Committee and
reflected in each award agreement. Upon exercise of a stock
option, the participant may pay the exercise price using
(i) cash, Company common stock or a combination of cash and
Company common stock or (ii) a cashless exercise procedure
through the participants broker or (iii) any other
payment method approved or accepted by the Committee. The
maximum term of stock options is ten years.
Stock Appreciation Rights. Stock appreciation rights
entitle the participant to receive a payment equal to the
spread between the exercise price of the right and
the fair market value of the shares subject to the right on the
date of exercise. SARs may be free standing or granted in tandem
with a stock option. The payment upon SAR exercise shall be in
shares of Company common stock. The Committee will determine the
term of any SAR granted, provided that no SAR, including an SAR
issued in tandem with a stock option, may be exercised after the
tenth anniversary of its grant date.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. An award of
restricted stock involves the immediate transfer by the Company
to the participant of a specific number of shares which are
subject to a risk of forfeiture and a restriction on
transferability. This restriction will lapse following a stated
period of time, upon attainment of specified performance targets
or some combination of the foregoing. A holder of restricted
stock may have all of the rights of a holder of Company common
stock (except for the restriction on transferability), including
the right to vote and receive dividends unless otherwise
determined by the Committee and set forth in the award
agreement. A restricted stock unit is similar to restricted
stock except no shares are issued. In addition, holders of
restricted stock units will have no voting rights, but may be
entitled, if so determined by the Committee, to receive dividend
equivalents, which entitle the holder to be credited with an
amount equal to all cash dividends paid on the shares underlying
restricted stock units while the units are outstanding and which
are converted into additional restricted stock units.
Performance Awards. The Committee may grant performance
awards in the form of performance shares or performance units
and will set the specific terms of any such award. The Committee
will set the initial value of each performance unit at the time
of grant. Each performance share will have an initial value
equal to the fair market value of a share on the date of grant,
as determined by the Committee. The Committee will set
performance goals which, depending on the extent to which they
are met, will determine the value and/or the number of
performance units/shares to be paid to the participant. Holders
of performance share awards will have voting rights only upon
issuance of the underlying shares. The Committee may grant
holders of performance share awards the right to receive
dividend equivalents, which may be paid currently or accumulated
and paid to the extent that performance shares become
non-forfeitable, as determined by the Committee. Dividend
equivalents may be settled in cash, shares or a combination of
both. Holders of performance units will have no voting rights or
dividend rights associated with those awards.
Other Stock-Based Awards. The Committee may also grant
other types of stock-based awards, including the grant or offer
for sale of unrestricted shares of Company common stock. The
terms of any such award will be at the discretion of the
Committee, subject to the terms of the 2005 Plan.
27
Shares Available for Awards; Maximum Awards. A
maximum of 10,000,000 shares of the Companys common
stock will be available for issuance to participants under the
2005 Plan. Unless the Committee determines that an award is not
to qualify as performance based compensation, the maximum number
of shares for either option or SAR awards to a participant in
any one year is, as to each of the foregoing,
1,000,000 shares. The maximum aggregate grant for awards of
either (i) restricted stock or restricted stock units,
(ii) performance units or performance shares or
(iii) other stock based awards to a participant in any one
year is, as to each of the foregoing, 350,000. The foregoing
will be doubled upon effectiveness of the 2-for-1 stock split
set forth in proposal 2 above.
Adjustments for Corporate Changes. In the event of
a recapitalization, reclassification or other specified event
affecting the Company or shares of Company common stock, the
Committee shall make appropriate and proportionate adjustments
in the number and kind of shares that may be issued under the
2005 Plan, as well as other maximum limitations under the 2005
Plan, and the number and kind of shares of common stock or other
rights and prices under outstanding awards.
Performance Measures. The 2005 Plan provides that,
with respect to certain awards, the Committee may make the
degree of payout and/or vesting dependent upon the attainment of
certain performance measures set forth in the 2005 Plan.
Performance goals with respect to awards intended to qualify as
performance based compensation are limited to the following
performance measures: net earnings or net income (before or
after taxes); earnings per share; net sales or revenue growth;
net operating profit; return measures (including return on
assets, capital, invested capital, equity, sales or revenue);
cash flow (including operating cash flow, free cash flow, cash
flow return on equity and cash flow return on investment);
EBITDA; gross or operating margins; productivity ratios; share
price (including growth measures and total shareholder return);
expense targets; margins; operating efficiency; market share;
customer satisfaction; working capital targets; and economic
value added (net operating profit after tax minus the sum of
capital multiplied by the cost of capital).
Performance measures may be used to measure the performance of
the Company and its subsidiaries as a whole or any business unit
of the Company or any combination thereof. Performance measures
may also be established relative to: (i) peer companies
selected by the Committee; (ii) internal goals; or
(iii) levels attained in prior years. The Committee may
provide in any award that an evaluation of performance may
include or exclude various events, including asset write-downs,
the effect of changes in the tax laws and extraordinary items
such as acquisitions or divestitures. In addition, if applicable
tax and/or securities laws and applicable Exchange rules change
to permit Committee discretion to alter the governing
performance measures, then the Committee may make such changes
without seeking stockholder approval.
Tax Withholding. To the extent that a participant
incurs any tax liability in connection with the exercise or
receipt of an award under the 2005 Plan, the Company has the
right to deduct or withhold, or to require the participant to
pay to the Company, the minimum statutory amount to satisfy
federal, state and local tax withholding obligations. In
addition, the Committee may allow the participant to satisfy the
withholding obligation by allowing the Company to withhold a
portion of the shares to be issued to the participant. Those
shares would be available for future awards under the 2005 Plan.
Transferability. All awards under the 2005 Plan
are nontransferable other than by will or the laws of descent
and distribution, provided that, with respect to awards other
than incentive stock options, the Committee may, in its sole
discretion, permit transferability to a family member or family
trust, foundation or other entity, on a general or specific
basis. Unless otherwise provided in the award agreement, awards
granted under the 2005 Plan may be exercised only by the
participant during the participants lifetime.
Amendment and Termination. The Committee may, at
any time and from time to time and in any respect, amend or
modify the 2005 Plan. The Board must obtain stockholder approval
of any material amendment to the 2005 Plan if required by any
applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule. In addition,
no option or SAR award under the 2005 Plan may be repriced,
replaced or regranted through cancellation without the prior
approval of the stockholders, except for adjustments by the
Committee for corporate changes described above. The Board of
Directors may amend the 2005 Plan or any award agreement, which
amendment may be retroactive, in order to conform it to any
present or future law, regulation or ruling relating
28
to plans of this or similar nature. No amendment or modification
of the 2005 Plan or any award agreement may adversely affect any
outstanding award without the written consent of the participant
holding the award.
Future 2005 Plan Benefits. Awards under the 2005
Plan are discretionary and cannot be determined at this time.
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences. The
following is a brief description of certain federal income tax
consequences that will generally apply to awards issued under
the 2005 Plan, based on current federal income tax laws. This
summary is not intended to be exhaustive and, among other
things, does not describe state, local or foreign income and
other tax consequences. Participants should not rely on this
discussion for individual tax advice, as each participants
situation and the tax consequences of exercising awards and
disposing of the underlying shares of common stock will vary
depending upon the specific facts and circumstances involved.
Each participant is advised to consult with his or her own tax
advisor.
Incentive Stock Options. A participant will not recognize
income upon the grant or exercise of an award that qualifies as
an incentive stock option (ISO) under the 2005 Plan.
However, the difference between the fair market value of the
stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price is an item
of tax preference which may cause the participant to be subject
to the alternative minimum tax in the year in which the ISO is
exercised.
If a participant exercises an ISO and does not dispose of the
underlying shares within (i) two years from the date of
grant of the ISO, and (ii) one year from the date of
exercise, the participant will generally recognize capital gain
or loss on a subsequent sale of the stock equal to the
difference between the sales price and the exercise price. If a
participant disposes of common stock acquired upon exercise of
an ISO before the expiration of either the two-year or the
one-year holding periods described in the preceding sentence
(each a disqualifying disposition), the participant
will generally realize ordinary income in an amount equal to the
lesser of (a) the excess of the fair market value of the
shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price, or
(b) the excess of the fair market value of the shares on
the date of disposition over the exercise price. The remaining
gain, if any, will be taxed to the participant as long-term or
short-term capital gain depending on the holding period for such
shares. The Company will not be allowed any deduction for
federal income tax purposes at either the time of grant or the
time of exercise of an ISO. Upon any disqualifying disposition
by a participant, the Company will generally be allowed a
deduction to the extent the participant realizes ordinary income.
Nonqualified Stock Options. A participant who is granted
an option under the 2005 Plan which does not qualify as an ISO
shall be treated as having been granted a nonqualified stock
option (NQSO).
Generally, the grant of an NQSO does not result in a participant
recognizing income. Upon the exercise of an NQSO, the
participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to
the excess of the fair market value of the shares of the common
stock at the time of exercise over the exercise price of the
NQSO. The Company will generally be entitled to a deduction for
federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the amount
included in income by the participant, provided the Company
satisfies its information reporting obligations with respect to
such income.
On a subsequent sale of the shares of the common stock, the
participant will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the
difference between the amount realized from the sale of stock
and the participants adjusted basis in those shares, which
will generally be the sum of the amount paid and the amount of
income previously recognized by the participant in connection
with the exercise of the NQSO. Such capital gain will be long or
short term depending upon the holding period for such shares.
Stock Appreciation Rights. In general, a participant will
not recognize ordinary income for federal income tax purposes
upon the grant of an SAR and the Company will not be entitled to
a deduction at that time. Upon the exercise of an SAR, the
participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the amount
by which the fair market value of a share on the exercise date
exceeds the exercise price of the SAR, multiplied by the number
of shares with respect to which the participant exercises his or
her SAR. The Company will be entitled to a federal income tax
deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income the recipient
is required to
29
recognize in connection with the exercise. The
participants basis in those shares will equal their fair
market value on the date of their acquisition.
In general, the issuance of a tandem SAR will not result in a
participant recognizing ordinary income. The Company will not be
entitled to a deduction at such time. Upon the exercise of a
tandem SAR, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal
to the amount by which the fair market value of the shares
acquired under the tandem SAR on the exercise date exceeds the
exercise price of such shares. The Company will generally be
entitled to a corresponding deduction equal to the amount of
income recognized by the participant.
Restricted Stock. In general, a participant will not
recognize any income upon an award of restricted stock, provided
such stock is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and is
nontransferable. The participant will recognize ordinary income,
for federal income tax purposes, at the time the restricted
stock is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture
or becomes transferable. The amount taxed to the participant is
equal to the excess of the fair market value of the restricted
stock at the time the restriction lapses over the amount (if
any) paid for the restricted stock by the participant, and such
income will generally be taxed at ordinary income rates. The
Company will generally be allowed a federal income tax deduction
in an amount equal to the amount included in income by the
participant, provided such amount constitutes an ordinary and
necessary business expense, and provided further that the
Company satisfies its information reporting obligations with
respect to such income. Such deduction will be allowed in the
tax year in which the participant recognizes such income.
Within thirty (30) days after the date restricted stock is
transferred pursuant to an award, a participant may elect under
Section 83(b) of the Code to be taxed on the fair market
value of the restricted stock at the time of the award, rather
than at the time the restricted stock is no longer subject to a
substantial risk of forfeiture or becomes transferable. In such
case, the Company would be allowed a federal income tax
deduction in the year of the award. If such an election is made,
the participant will not recognize any income at the time the
restricted stock becomes unrestricted. If the participant
subsequently forfeits the restricted stock, the participant will
not be allowed a deduction in respect of such forfeiture, and no
refund will be available to the participant for the taxes
previously paid, nor shall the Company have any obligation to
reimburse the participant.
Regardless of whether a participant makes a Code
Section 83(b) election, upon a subsequent sale or exchange
of the restricted stock, the participant will recognize capital
gain or loss based on the difference between the amount realized
from the sale of stock and the participants adjusted basis
in those shares, which will generally be the sum of the amount
paid (if any) and the amount of income previously recognized by
the participant. The capital gain or loss will be long-term gain
or loss if the shares are held by the participant for at least
one year after the restrictions lapse or the shares become
transferable, whichever occurs first. If a Code
Section 83(b) election is made, the participants
holding period in the shares will begin to run from the date of
the transfer.
Other Stock-Based or Performance-Based Awards. The
recipient of restricted stock units, performance units/shares or
other stock-based or performance-based awards under the 2005
Plan will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant as
long as the award is nontransferable and is subject to a
substantial risk of forfeiture as a result of performance-based
vesting targets, continued services requirements or other
conditions that must be satisfied before delivery of shares can
occur. The recipient will generally recognize ordinary income
when the substantial risk of forfeiture expires or is removed.
The Company will generally be entitled to a corresponding
deduction equal to the amount of income the recipient
recognizes. On a subsequent sale of the shares, the recipient
will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference
between the sales price and the participants adjusted
basis in those shares, which will generally be the amount of
income previously recognized by the participant.
Miscellaneous Tax Issues. Compensation to a participant
who is an employee which results from awards under the 2005 Plan
will constitute wages for purposes of the Federal Insurance
Contributions Act and the Federal Unemployment Tax Act and thus
will result in additional tax liability to the Company, generally
30
with respect to each award at the time that such award is no
longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture or becomes
transferable.
Board Recommendation; Interest of Certain Persons
The Board of Directors believes that the 2005 Plan will provide
a valuable benefit to the Company by enhancing its ability to
attract and retain officers, directors and other eligible
participants. The Board has approved the form of the 2005 Plan
and has recommended that it be submitted to the stockholders at
the Annual Meeting for their approval. It is expected that the
Board of Directors will formally adopt the 2005 Plan after the
stockholders have approved it. The Board believes that the
approval of the 2005 Plan is in the Companys and the
stockholders best interests.
The Companys executive officers and directors have an
interest in the proposal to adopt the 2005 Plan since each is an
eligible participant in awards under the 2005 Plan.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR approval of the
MGM MIRAGE 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
SELECTION OF AUDITORS
Proposal No. 4
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company is
scheduled to meet prior to the stockholders meeting to
select, subject to ratification by the stockholders, the
independent registered public accounting firm to audit the
consolidated financial statements of the Company during the year
ended December 31, 2005. It is anticipated that the Audit
Committee will select the firm of Deloitte & Touche
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm.
A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at
the stockholders meeting with the opportunity to make a
statement if he or she desires to do so and to respond to
appropriate questions.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR adoption of this
proposal.
Fees Paid To Auditors
The following table sets forth fees paid to our auditors,
Deloitte & Touche LLP, in 2004 and 2003 for audit and
non-audit services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees
|
|
$ |
1,664,000 |
|
|
$ |
710,000 |
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
238,000 |
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
376,000 |
|
|
|
369,000 |
|
All other fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,094,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,379,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The category of Audit Fees includes fees for our
annual audit and quarterly reviews, the attestation reports on
the Companys internal control over financial reporting,
accounting consultations, statutory audits required by gaming
regulators and assistance with SEC filings.
The category of Audit-Related Fees includes employee
benefit plan audits, due diligence in connection with
acquisitions and internal control reviews not associated with
the attestation reports on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
The category of Tax Fees includes tax consultation
and planning fees and tax compliance services.
The category of All Other Fees includes human
resources consulting fees.
31
Pre-Approved Policies and Procedures
Under our former Audit Committee charter, pre-approval of
services provided by the independent auditor was not required,
though the Audit Committee had an existing practice of approving
the audit and significant non-audit services. Under SEC rules
effective May 6, 2003, all services provided by the
independent auditor under engagements entered into after
May 6, 2003 are subject to approval by the Audit Committee.
A majority of the fees disclosed above for 2003 relate to
services for which the engagement was entered into before
May 6, 2003. Subsequent to that date, all services provided
by the independent auditor have been pre-approved by the Audit
Committee or by the Audit Committee Chairman, under the
authority delegated by the Audit Committee.
Our current Audit Committee Charter, attached hereto as
Appendix B, contains our policies related to pre-approval
of services provided by the independent auditor. The Audit
Committee, or the Chairman of the Audit Committee to whom such
authority was delegated by the Audit Committee, must pre-approve
all services provided by the independent auditor. Any such
pre-approval by the Chairman must be presented to the Audit
Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
NOTICE CONCERNING STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS
Proposals of stockholders intended to be presented at the 2006
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including nominations for
directors, must be received by the Company on or before
December 9, 2005 and must satisfy the requirements of
Rule 14a-8 of Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act in
order to be considered by the Board of Directors for inclusion
in the form of proxy and proxy statement to be issued by the
Board of Directors for that meeting. All such stockholder
proposals and nominations should be submitted to the Secretary
of the Company as follows: Corporate Secretary, MGM MIRAGE, 3600
Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention:
Stockholder Communications. With respect to the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders for 2006, under Rule 14a-4 of
Regulation 14A, the Company may exercise discretionary
voting authority under proxies it solicits for that meeting to
vote on any matter not specified in the proxy unless the Company
is notified about the matter no later than February 8, 2006
and the stockholder satisfies the other requirements of
Rule 14a-4(c).
OTHER INFORMATION
The Company will bear all costs in connection with the
solicitation of proxies. The Company intends to reimburse
brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and others for their
out-of-pocket expenses and reasonable clerical expenses related
thereto. Officers, directors and regular employees of the
Company and its subsidiaries may request the return of proxies
from stockholders, for which no additional compensation will be
paid to them.
The Companys Annual Report to Stockholders for the year
ended December 31, 2004 accompanies this Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
and Chief Executive Officer |
32
Appendix A
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
MGM MIRAGE
MGM MIRAGE, a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
(the Corporation), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:
|
|
|
FIRST: That pursuant to a duly called and noticed meeting
of the Board of Directors of the Company, resolutions were duly
adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Companys
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the Certificate
of Incorporation), declaring said amendment to be
advisable and providing that the amendment be presented to the
stockholders for consideration and action by written consent.
The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as
follows: |
|
|
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Certificate of Incorporation of
the Company be amended by changing Article 4 thereof so
that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as follows: |
|
|
|
The aggregate number of shares which the corporation shall
have the authority to issue is 600,000,000 shares, all of which
are to be common stock, and the par value of each of such shares
is to be $.01. |
|
|
|
SECOND: That thereafter, in accordance with
Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, the necessary number of shares as required by the
statute were voted in favor of the amendment at a meeting of the
stockholders of the Company on May 3, 2005. |
|
|
THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance
with the provisions of Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, MGM MIRAGE has duly caused this
certificate to be signed by Bryan Wright, its Senior Vice
President and Assistant General Counsel, this 3rd day of May,
2005.
|
|
|
Bryan Wright |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
and Assistant General Counsel |
A-1
Appendix B
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
MGM MIRAGE
OVERALL MISSION
The Audit Committee (the Committee) is appointed by
the Board of Directors of MGM MIRAGE (the Company)
to (a) assist the Board of Directors in monitoring
(i) the integrity of the Companys financial
statements, (ii) the Companys compliance with legal
and regulatory requirements, (iii) the outside
auditors qualifications and independence and (iv) the
performance of the Companys internal audit function and
outside auditors; and (b) prepare the annual report
required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) to be included in the Companys
annual proxy statement. In fulfilling its responsibilities, the
Committee shall oversee, among other things, the financial
reporting process, the system of internal controls, the audit
process and the Companys policies and procedures
respecting compliance with governmental laws, rules and
regulations and the Companys Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This Amended and Restated Charter shall become effective upon
adoption by the Board of Directors or Executive Committee
(unless otherwise noted herein).
COMPOSITION AND ORGANIZATION
The Audit Committee shall be comprised of at least three
(3) directors appointed by the Board of Directors, each to
serve until the next succeeding annual organizational meeting of
the Board (following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders) or
until his or her earlier death, resignation, disqualification or
removal. One of its members shall be appointed to serve as chair
and shall preside at Committee meetings and make regular reports
to the Board of Directors.
MEETINGS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Committee shall meet as frequently as necessary to properly
carry out its responsibilities, but not less than once every
fiscal quarter. Such meetings, at the Committees
discretion, may be in person, by telephone or by unanimous
written consent. The Committee shall keep written minutes of its
meetings, which shall be retained in the minute books of the
Company.
QUALIFICATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP
Each member of the Audit Committee shall be financially
literate (or will become so within a reasonable time after
his or her appointment to the Audit Committee), and at least one
member shall be an Audit Committee Financial Expert (as defined
by Item 401(h)(2) of Regulation S-K), such designation
being based upon having accounting or related financial
management expertise, as the Companys Board interprets
such qualification in its business judgment. Upon appointing a
director to the Audit Committee, the Board will affirmatively
determine whether such director is an Audit Committee Financial
Expert based on the Board of Directors judgment, and
taking into account the relevant professional experience and
education of the directors, and any other factors deemed
relevant by the Board of Directors. Each member shall be
independent under both the rules of the NYSE and
Rule 10A-3(b) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1934,
as amended (the Act) and free of any relationship
that, in the business judgment of the Board, would interfere
with the exercise of independent judgment with respect to the
Company and its management.
B-1
No director shall qualify as independent for
purposes of serving on the Audit Committee unless the Board of
Directors determines that the director (i) has no material
relationship with the Company either directly or as a partner,
shareholder or officer of an organization that has a
relationship with the Company and (ii) meets the
independence requirement set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(ii)
under the Act.
No director may serve as a member of the Audit Committee if such
director serves on the audit committees of more than two other
public companies unless the Board of Directors determines that
such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such
director to effectively serve on the Audit Committee.
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The Audit Committee shall have the following duties and
responsibilities and such other responsibilities as the Board of
Directors, the SEC or the NYSE shall require from time to time:
A. FINANCIAL REPORTING
|
|
|
1. Review with management and the outside auditors the
Companys annual audited financial statements, the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K and the
Companys quarterly financial statements, including the
related disclosures required by the SEC and by generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This review
shall also include the Companys disclosures under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, including the
disclosures regarding Critical Accounting Policies.
Review and discuss any major issues concerning, or significant
changes in, the accounting policies, principles or practices of
the Company. |
|
|
2. Require the outside auditors to review the financial
information included in the Companys interim financial
statements before the Company files its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q with the SEC and report the results of such
review to the Committee. |
|
|
3. Review with management and the outside auditors
significant accounting, tax and reporting issues, including
recent professional and regulatory pronouncements, to determine
their impact, if any, on the Companys financial statements. |
|
|
4. Discuss guidelines and policies governing the process by
which senior management of the Company and the relevant
departments of the Company assess and manage the Companys
exposure to risk, and review any significant financial risk
exposures facing the Company and managements plans to
monitor, control and/or minimize such exposures. |
|
|
5. Discuss with management and the outside auditors, as
appropriate: (a) analyses prepared by management and/or the
outside auditors setting forth significant financial reporting
issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of
the financial statements, including analyses of the effects of
alternative GAAP methods on the financial statements and
(b) the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives, as
well as off-balance sheet structures, on the financial
statements of the Company. |
|
|
6. Discuss with management earnings press releases as well
as financial information and earnings guidance provided to
analysts and rating agencies. |
B. INTERNAL CONTROLS
|
|
|
1. Discuss with the outside auditors the adequacy of the
Companys system of internal controls (including the
controls, security and breakdown contingency plans for
computerized systems and applications) and whether prior
recommendations concerning internal controls made by internal
and outside auditors have been implemented by management. Review
and consider any disclosures made to the Audit Committee by the
Chief Executive Officer and/or the Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302(a)(5) of the Act. |
|
|
2. Review the activities, organizational structure,
independence and effectiveness of the internal audit function,
including the scope of its responsibilities and the adequacy of
its staffing and budget. |
B-2
|
|
|
Review the annual internal audit plan, completed audit reports,
recommendations and follow-up. Review the significant reports to
management prepared by the internal auditors and
managements responses thereto. |
|
|
3. Meet at least quarterly with the outside auditors,
members of the internal audit department, the chief financial
officer and/or any other members of management in separate
executive sessions to discuss any matters the Committee or any
of the foregoing persons believe should be discussed privately
or warrant Committee attention. The Committee may investigate
any matters brought to its attention within the scope of its
duties and may, in its discretion and without Board approval,
retain outside legal counsel or independent financial or other
advisors for such purpose. |
|
|
4. Consider any reports or communications (and
managements and/or the internal audit departments
responses thereto) submitted to the Audit Committee by the
outside auditors required by or referred to in Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61, as it may be modified or
supplemented, including reports and communications related to
any restriction on audit scope or significant issues discussed
with the outside auditors national office. |
C. AUDIT PROCESS
|
|
|
1. Retain and terminate the outside auditors. The Committee
shall have the sole authority to approve all audit engagement
proposals, including the planning, staffing and scope of the
audit and fees to be charged as well as non-audit engagements
with the outside auditors not otherwise prohibited by
Section 201 of the Act or other applicable laws, rules or
regulations. The Committee may not delegate this duty to the
management, but may obtain the input of management. The
Committee, in its discretion, may delegate to one or more of its
members the authority to pre-approve non-audit engagements,
provided any such pre-approval is presented to the Committee at
its next scheduled meeting. |
|
|
2. Prior to the audit, meet with the outside auditors to
review the scope, planning and staffing of the audit. |
|
|
3. Following the completion of the audit, review with the
outside auditors (a) any significant changes in the audit
plan; (b) any difficulties or significant disagreements
with management encountered in the course of the audit,
including any restrictions on the scope of activities or access
to required information; (c) the nature and extent of any
material proposed adjustments that were passed (as
immaterial or otherwise); (d) the management or internal
control letter issued, or proposed to be issued, by the outside
auditors to the Company and the Companys response thereto
and (e) any other matters required under generally accepted
auditing standards to be communicated to the Audit Committee or
the Board of Directors, obtain from the outside auditors
assurance that Section 10A of the Act has not been
implicated. |
|
|
4. Obtain and review, at least annually, a formal written
statement from the outside auditors (the Auditors
Statement) describing, to the extent permitted under
applicable auditing standards: the auditors internal
quality-control procedures; any material issues raised by the
most recent internal quality-control review or peer review of
the auditors, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental
or professional authorities within the preceding five years,
respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the
auditors, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues; and,
for the purpose of assessing the outside auditors
independence, all relationships between the outside auditors and
the Company, including each non-audit service provided to the
Company and at least the matters set forth in Independence
Standards Board No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit
Committees). |
|
|
5. Discuss with the outside auditors at least annually
their Auditors Statement. Engage in an active dialogue
with the outside auditors concerning any disclosed relationships
or services that may affect the quality of the audit services or
the objectivity and independence of the outside auditors.
Recommend that the Board of Directors, in response to the
Auditors Statement, take such steps as it may deem
appropriate to oversee the independence of the outside auditors. |
B-3
|
|
|
6. Prepare an evaluation of the outside auditors
qualifications based on a review and evaluation of the
Auditors Statement. |
|
|
7. Review and evaluate the qualifications, performance and
independence of the outside auditor, including the lead partner.
This review should take into account the opinions of management
and the Companys internal auditors. |
|
|
8. Determine whether, in order to assure continuing auditor
independence and to comply with Section 10A(j) of the Act,
there should be a rotation of the then current lead or
coordinating audit partner, or even of the audit firm itself. |
|
|
9. Present conclusions with respect to the outside auditor
to the full Board of Directors. |
D. POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES
|
|
|
1. Ascertain from management, legal counsel, the outside
auditors and/or the senior internal audit executive whether the
Company and its controlled affiliates are in compliance with
governmental laws, rules and regulations and whether there are
any legal or regulatory compliance matters that could have a
material impact on the Companys financial statements. |
|
|
2. Review the results of any investigation and follow-up
(including any disciplinary action) with respect to fraudulent
or illegal acts or accounting irregularities. |
|
|
3. Endeavor to maintain effective working relationships
with, and provide an open channel of communication to,
management, the Board, the internal audit department and the
outside auditors. |
|
|
4. Establish clear hiring policies for employees or former
employees of the outside auditors. |
|
|
5. Establish procedures for (i) the receipt, retention
and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and
(ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of
the Company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or
auditing matters. |
|
|
6. Engage and retain outside counsel, experts and other
advisors as the Audit Committee may deem appropriate in its sole
discretion and approve related fees and retention terms in
connection with such engagement and retention. |
E. GENERAL
|
|
|
1. Review and reassess at least annually the adequacy of
this Charter and recommend any proposed changes to the Board of
Directors for approval. Direct that a copy of this Charter be
included as an appendix to the Companys proxy statement
commencing in 2004 and thereafter at least once every three
years. |
|
|
2. Prepare the Audit Committee Report required by the SEC
to be included in the Companys annual proxy statement
commencing in 2004, disclosing, among other things, whether the
Audit Committee (i) has reviewed and discussed the audited
financial statements with management; (ii) has discussed
with the outside auditors the matters required by Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61; (iii) has received from,
and discussed with, the outside auditors the required written
disclosures regarding their independence and (iv) based on
such review and discussion, has recommended to the Board that
the Companys audited financial statements be filed with
the SEC on Form 10-K. The report shall also disclose
whether the Audit Committee has a written charter. |
|
|
3. Prepare and review with the Board an annual performance
evaluation of the Audit Committee, which evaluation must compare
the performance of the Audit Committee with the requirements of
this Amended and Restated Charter, and set forth the goals and
objectives of the Audit Committee for the upcoming year. The
performance evaluation by the Audit Committee shall be conducted
in such manner as the Audit Committee deems appropriate. The
report to the Board may take the form of an oral report |
B-4
|
|
|
by the chair of the Audit Committee or any other member of the
Audit Committee designated by the Audit Committee to make such
report. |
|
|
4. Engage independent counsel and other advisors, to the
extent the Committee determines such engagement necessary to
carry out its duties. |
|
|
5. In its capacity as a committee of the Board of
Directors, determine appropriate funding for payment of:
(i) compensation to any registered public accounting firm
engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report
or performing other audit, review or attest services for the
Company; (ii) compensation to any advisors employed by the
Audit Committee; and (iii) ordinary administrative expenses
of the Audit Committee that are necessary or appropriate in
carrying out its duties. |
LIMITATION ON DUTIES
While the Audit Committee has the duties, responsibilities and
authority set forth in this Amended and Restated Charter,
nothing contained herein shall be deemed to impose on the
Committee any duty, in the ordinary course, to plan or conduct
audits or to make any determination that the Companys
financial statements are accurate and in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. Such duties are the
responsibility of management.
B-5
Appendix C
2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan
MGM MIRAGE
Effective May 3, 2005
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 1. |
|
Establishment, Purpose, and Duration |
|
|
C-1 |
|
|
Article 2.
|
|
Definitions |
|
|
C-1 |
|
|
Article 3.
|
|
Administration |
|
|
C-4 |
|
|
Article 4.
|
|
Shares Subject to this Plan and Maximum Awards |
|
|
C-5 |
|
|
Article 5.
|
|
Eligibility and Participation |
|
|
C-6 |
|
|
Article 6.
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
C-6 |
|
|
Article 7.
|
|
Stock Appreciation Rights |
|
|
C-8 |
|
|
Article 8.
|
|
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
C-9 |
|
|
Article 9.
|
|
Performance Units/ Performance Shares |
|
|
C-10 |
|
|
Article 10.
|
|
Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards |
|
|
C-11 |
|
|
Article 11.
|
|
Transferability of Awards |
|
|
C-11 |
|
|
Article 12.
|
|
Performance Measures |
|
|
C-12 |
|
|
Article 13.
|
|
Dividend Equivalents |
|
|
C-13 |
|
|
Article 14.
|
|
Beneficiary Designation |
|
|
C-13 |
|
|
Article 15.
|
|
Rights of Participants |
|
|
C-13 |
|
|
Article 16.
|
|
Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination |
|
|
C-14 |
|
|
Article 17.
|
|
Withholding |
|
|
C-14 |
|
|
Article 18.
|
|
Successors |
|
|
C-15 |
|
|
Article 19.
|
|
General Provisions |
|
|
C-15 |
|
MGM MIRAGE
2005 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
Article 1.
Establishment, Purpose, and Duration
1.1 Establishment. MGM
MIRAGE, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as the
Company), establishes an incentive compensation plan
to be known as the MGM MIRAGE 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(hereinafter referred to as the Plan), as set forth
in this document.
This Plan permits the grant of Nonqualified Stock Options,
Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted
Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, Performance
Units and Other Stock-Based Awards.
This Plan shall become effective upon shareholder approval (the
Effective Date) and shall remain in effect as
provided in Section 1.3 hereof.
1.2 Purpose of this Plan.
The purpose of this Plan is to provide a means whereby
Employees, Directors and Independent Marketing Agents of the
Company develop a sense of proprietorship and personal
involvement in the development and financial success of the
Company, and to encourage them to devote their best efforts to
the business of the Company, thereby advancing the interests of
the Company and its shareholders. A further purpose of this Plan
is to provide a means through which the Company may attract able
individuals to become Employees or serve as Directors of the
Company and to provide a means for such individuals to acquire
and maintain stock ownership in the Company, thereby
strengthening their concern for the welfare of the Company.
1.3 Duration of this Plan.
Unless sooner terminated as provided herein, this Plan shall
terminate ten (10) years from the Effective Date. After
this Plan is terminated, no Awards may be granted but Awards
previously granted shall remain outstanding in accordance with
their applicable terms and conditions and this Plans terms
and conditions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Incentive
Stock Options may be granted more than ten (10) years after
the earlier of (a) adoption of this Plan by the Board, or
(b) the Effective Date.
Article 2.
Definitions
Whenever used in this Plan, the following terms shall have the
meanings set forth below, and when the meaning is intended, the
initial letter of the word shall be capitalized.
2.1 Annual Award
Limit or Annual Award Limits have
the meaning set forth in Section 4.3.
2.2 Associate
shall mean any corporation or other entity (including, but
not limited to, a partnership or a limited liability company),
that the Company has or obtains, directly or indirectly, a
proprietary interest of less than fifty percent (50%), by reason
of stock ownership or otherwise, and is designated as an
Associate for purposes of this Plan by the Committee.
2.3 Award means,
individually or collectively, a grant under this Plan of
Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, SARs,
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares,
Performance Units, or Other Stock-Based Awards, in each case
subject to the terms of this Plan.
2.4 Award Agreement
means either (i) a written agreement entered into by
the Company and a Participant setting forth the terms and
provisions applicable to an Award granted under this Plan, or
(ii) a written or electronic statement issued by the
Company to a Participant describing the terms and provisions of
such Award, including any amendment or modification thereof. The
Committee may provide for the use of electronic, internet or
other non-paper Award Agreements, and the use of electronic,
internet or other non-paper means for the acceptance thereof and
actions thereunder by a Participant.
C-1
2.5 Beneficial Owner
or Beneficial Ownership shall have the
meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 13d-3 of the General
Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act.
2.6 Board or
Board of Directors means the Board of
Directors of the Company.
2.7 Code means
the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from
time to time. For purposes of this Plan, references to sections
of the Code shall be deemed to include references to any
applicable regulations thereunder and any successor or similar
provision.
2.8 Committee
means the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the
Board or a subcommittee thereof, or any other committee
designated by the Board to administer this Plan. The members of
the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by and shall
serve at the discretion of the Board. If the Committee does not
exist or cannot function for any reason, the Board may take any
action under the Plan that would otherwise be the responsibility
of the Committee.
2.9 Company
means MGM MIRAGE, a Delaware corporation, and any successor
thereto as provided in Article 18 herein.
2.10 Covered
Employee means any salaried Employee who is or may
become a Covered Employee, as defined in Code
Section 162(m), and who is designated, either as an
individual Employee or class of Employees, by the Committee
within the shorter of (i) ninety (90) days after the
beginning of the Performance Period, or (ii) twenty-five
(25) percent (25%) of the Performance Period has elapsed,
as a Covered Employee under this Plan for such
applicable Performance Period.
2.11 Director
means any individual who is a member of the Board of
Directors of the Company.
2.12 Effective Date
has the meaning set forth in Section 1.1.
2.13 Employee
means any person designated as an employee of the Company,
its Associates, and/or its Subsidiaries on the payroll records
thereof. An Employee shall not include any individual during any
period he or she is classified or treated by the Company,
Associate, and/or Subsidiary as an independent contractor, a
consultant, or any employee of an employment, consulting, or
temporary agency or any other entity other than the Company,
Associate, and/or Subsidiary, without regard to whether such
individual is subsequently determined to have been, or is
subsequently retroactively reclassified as a common-law employee
of the Company, Associate, and/or Subsidiary during such period.
2.14 Exchange Act
means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from
time to time, or any successor act thereto.
2.15 Fair Market
Value or FMV means a price that is
based on the opening, closing, actual, high, low, or average
selling prices of a Share reported on the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE) or other established stock exchange
(or exchanges) on the applicable date, the preceding trading
day, the next succeeding trading day, or an average of trading
days, as determined by the Committee in its discretion. Unless
the Committee determines otherwise. Fair Market Value shall be
deemed to be equal to the reported closing price of a Share on
the most recent date on which Shares were publicly traded. In
the event Shares are not publicly determined at the time a
determination of their value is required to be made hereunder,
the determination of their Fair Market Value shall be made by
the Committee in such manner as it deems appropriate. Such
definition(s) of FMV shall be specified in each Award Agreement
and may differ depending on whether FMV is in reference to the
grant, exercise, vesting, settlement, or payout of an Award.
2.16 Family Members
of a Participant means any child, stepchild, grandchild,
parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former spouse, sibling,
niece, nephew, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law,
daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law of such
Participant, including adoptive relationships, any person
sharing such Participants household (other than a tenant
or employee), a trust in which such individuals have more than
fifty percent of the beneficial interest, a foundation in which
these individuals (or the Participant) control the management of
assets, and any other entity in which these individuals (or the
Participant) own more than fifty percent of the voting interest.
C-2
2.17 Freestanding
SAR means an SAR that is granted independently of any
Options, as described in Article 7.
2.18 Full Value
Award means an Award other than in the form of an ISO,
NQSO or SAR, and which is settled by the issuance of Shares.
2.19 Grant Price
means the price established at the time of grant of a SAR
pursuant to Article 7, used to determine whether there is
any payment due upon exercise of the SAR.
2.20 Incentive Stock
Option or ISO means an Option to
purchase Shares granted under Article 6 to an Employee and
that is designated as an Incentive Stock Option and that is
intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422, or
any successor provision.
2.21 Independent Marketing
Agent means a representative hired as an independent
agent of the Company, and is treated as an independent
contractor, to carry out duties related to casino marketing
activities.
2.22 Insider
means an individual who is, on the relevant date, an
officer, or Director of the Company, or a more than ten percent
(10%) Beneficial Owner of any class of the Companys equity
securities that is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the
Exchange Act, as determined by the Board in accordance with
Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
2.23 Nonemployee
Director means a Director who is not an Employee.
2.24 Nonqualified Stock
Option or NQSO means an Option that
is not intended to meet the requirements of Code
Section 422, or that otherwise does not meet such
requirements.
2.25 Option
means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock
Option, as described in Article 6.
2.26 Option Price
means the price at which a Share may be purchased by a
Participant pursuant to an Option.
2.27 Other Stock-Based
Award means an equity-based or equity-related Award
not otherwise described by the terms of this Plan, granted
pursuant to Article 10.
2.28 Participant
means any eligible individual as set forth in Article 5 to
whom an Award is granted.
2.29 Performance-Based
Compensation means compensation under an Award that is
intended to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 162(m)
for certain performance-based compensation paid to Covered
Employees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Plan
shall be construed to mean that an Award which does not satisfy
the requirements for performance-based compensation under Code
Section 162(m) does not constitute performance-based
compensation for other purposes, including Code
Section 409A.
2.30 Performance
Measures means measures as described in
Article 12 on which the performance goals are based and
which are approved by the Companys shareholders pursuant
to this Plan in order to qualify Awards as Performance-Based
Compensation.
2.31 Performance
Period means the period of time during which the
performance goals must be met in order to determine the degree
of payout and/or vesting with respect to an Award.
2.32 Performance
Share means an Award under Article 9 herein and
subject to the terms of this Plan, denominated in Shares, the
value of which at the time it is payable is determined as a
function of the extent to which corresponding performance
criteria have been achieved.
2.33 Performance
Unit means an Award under Article 9 herein and
subject to the terms of this Plan, denominated in units, the
value of which at the time it is payable is determined as a
function of the extent to which corresponding performance
criteria have been achieved.
C-3
2.34 Period of
Restriction means the period when Restricted Stock or
Restricted Stock Units are subject to a substantial risk of
forfeiture (based on the passage of time, the achievement of
performance goals, or upon the occurrence of other events as
determined by the Committee, in its discretion), as provided in
Article 8.
2.35 Permitted
Transfer means any transfer of an Award, other than an
ISO, by a Participant to a Participants Family Member made
by gift or domestic relations order if such transfer is not for
value; provided, however, that neither (i) a transfer under
a domestic relations order in settlement of marital property
rights nor (ii) a transfer to an entity in which more than
fifty percent of the voting interests are owned by Family
Members or the Participant in exchange for an interest in that
entity shall be deemed a transfer for value for the purposes of
determining whether a transfer is a Permitted Transfer.
2.36 Plan means
the MGM MIRAGE 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
2.37 Plan Year
means the Companys fiscal year.
2.38 Prior Plans
means the MGM MIRAGE 1997 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan,
amended and restated May 13, 2003, and the MGM MIRAGE 1997
Incentive Stock Option Plan.
2.39 Restricted
Stock means an Award granted to a Participant pursuant
to Article 8.
2.40 Restricted Stock
Unit means an Award granted to a Participant pursuant
to Article 8, except no Shares are actually awarded to the
Participant on the date of grant.
2.41 Share means
a share of common stock of the Company, $.01 par value per
share.
2.42 Stock Appreciation
Right or SAR means an Award,
designated as an SAR, pursuant to the terms of Article 7
herein.
2.43 Subsidiary
means any corporation or other entity, whether domestic or
foreign, in which the Company has or obtains, directly or
indirectly, a proprietary interest of more than fifty percent
(50%) by reason of stock ownership or otherwise.
2.44 Tandem SAR
means an SAR that is granted in connection with a related
Option pursuant to Article 7 herein, the exercise of which
shall require forfeiture of the right to purchase a Share under
the related Option (and when a Share is purchased under the
Option, the Tandem SAR shall similarly be canceled).
Article 3.
Administration
3.1 General. The Committee
shall be responsible for administering this Plan, subject to
this Article 3 and the other provisions of this Plan. The
Committee may employ attorneys, consultants, accountants,
agents, and other individuals, any of whom may be an Employee,
and the Committee, the Company, and its officers and Directors
shall be entitled to rely upon the advice, opinions, or
valuations of any such individuals. All actions taken and all
interpretations and determinations made by the Committee shall
be final and binding upon the Participants, the Company, and all
other interested individuals.
3.2 Authority of the
Committee. The Committee shall have full and exclusive
discretionary power to interpret the terms and the intent of
this Plan and any Award Agreement or other agreement or document
ancillary to or in connection with this Plan, to determine
eligibility for Awards and to adopt such rules, regulations,
forms, instruments, and guidelines for administering this Plan
as the Committee may deem necessary or proper. Such authority
shall include, but not be limited to, selecting Award
recipients, establishing all Award terms and conditions,
including the terms and conditions set forth in Award
Agreements, granting Awards as an alternative to or as the form
of payment for grants or rights earned or due under compensation
plans or arrangements of the Company, construing any ambiguous
provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement, and, subject to
Article 16, adopting modifications and amendments to this
Plan or
C-4
any Award Agreement, including without limitation, any that are
necessary to comply with the laws of the countries and other
jurisdictions in which the Company, its Associates, and/or its
Subsidiaries operate.
3.3 Delegation. The
Committee may delegate to one or more of its members or to one
or more officers of the Company, and/or its Subsidiaries and
Associates or to one or more agents or advisors such
administrative duties or powers as it may deem advisable, and
the Committee or any individuals to whom it has delegated duties
or powers as aforesaid may employ one or more individuals to
render advice with respect to any responsibility the Committee
or such individuals may have under this Plan. The Committee may,
by resolution, authorize one or more officers of the Company to
do one or both of the following on the same basis as can the
Committee: (a) designate Employees to be recipients of
Awards; and (b) determine the size of any such Awards;
provided, however, (i) the Committee shall not delegate
such responsibilities to any such officer for Awards granted to
an Employee who is considered an Insider; (ii) the
resolution providing such authorization sets forth the total
number of Awards such officer(s) may grant; and (iii) the
officer(s) shall report periodically to the Committee regarding
the nature and scope of the Awards granted pursuant to the
authority delegated.
Article 4.
Shares Subject to this Plan and Maximum Awards
4.1 Number of Shares Available
for Awards. Subject to adjustment as provided in
Section 4.4 herein, the maximum number of Shares available
for issuance to Participants under this Plan (the Share
Authorization) shall be Ten million (10,000,000) Shares.
4.2 Share Usage. Shares
covered by an Award shall only be counted as used to the extent
they are actually issued. Any Shares related to Awards which
terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation, or otherwise
without the issuance of such Shares, are settled in cash in lieu
of Shares, or are exchanged with the Committees
permission, prior to the issuance of Shares, for Awards not
involving Shares, shall be available again for grant under this
Plan. Moreover, if the Option Price of any Option granted under
this Plan or the tax withholding requirements with respect to
any Award granted under this Plan are satisfied by tendering
Shares to the Company (by either actual delivery or by
attestation), or if an SAR is exercised, only the number of
Shares issued, net of the Shares tendered, if any, will be
deemed delivered for purposes of determining the maximum number
of Shares available for delivery under this Plan. The Shares
available for issuance under this Plan may be authorized and
unissued Shares or treasury Shares.
4.3 Annual Award Limits.
Unless and until the Committee determines that an Award to a
Covered Employee shall not be designed to qualify as
Performance-Based Compensation, the following limits (each an
Annual Award Limit and, collectively, Annual
Award Limits) shall apply to grants of such Awards under
this Plan:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Options: The maximum aggregate number of Shares subject
to Options granted in any one Plan Year to any one Participant
shall be one million (1,000,000). |
|
|
(b) |
SARs: The maximum number of Shares subject to Stock
Appreciation Rights granted in any one Plan Year to any one
Participant shall be one million (1,000,000). |
|
|
(c) |
Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units: The maximum
aggregate grant with respect to Awards of Restricted Stock or
Restricted Stock Units in any one Plan Year to any one
Participant shall be three hundred fifty thousand (350,000). |
|
|
(d) |
Performance Units or Performance Shares: The maximum
aggregate Award of Performance Units or Performance Shares that
a Participant may receive in any one Plan Year shall be three
hundred fifty thousand (350,000) Shares, or equal to the value
of three hundred fifty thousand (350,000) Shares determined as
of the date of vesting or payout, as applicable. |
C-5
|
|
|
|
(e) |
Other Stock-Based Awards: The maximum aggregate grant
with respect to Other Stock-Based Awards pursuant to
Article 10 in any one Plan Year to any one Participant
shall be three hundred fifty thousand (350,000). |
4.4 Adjustments in Authorized
Shares. If the outstanding securities of the class then
subject to this Plan are increased, decreased or exchanged for
or converted into cash, property or a different number or kind
of securities, or if cash, property or securities are
distributed in respect of those outstanding securities, in any
case as a result of a reorganization, merger consolidation,
recapitalization, restructuring , reclassification,
extraordinary dividend or other distribution, stock split,
reverse stock split or the like, or if substantially all of the
property and assets of the Company are sold, then, the Committee
will make appropriate and proportionate adjustments in
(a) the number and type of shares or other securities or
cash or other property that may be acquired pursuant to Options
or are the basis for determining the value of other Awards
previously granted under this Plan, (b) the maximum number
and type of shares or other securities or cash or other property
that may be issued pursuant to Awards thereafter granted under
this Plan, and (c) the maximum number of Shares for which
Awards may be granted during any one calendar year; provided,
however, that no adjustment may be made to the number of Shares
that may be acquired pursuant to outstanding Incentive Stock
Options or the maximum number of Shares with respect to which
Incentive Stock Options may be granted under this Plan to the
extent the adjustment would result in those options being
treated as other than Incentive Stock Options.
Subject to Section 16.3, the Committee, in its sole
discretion, may also make appropriate adjustments in the terms
of any Awards under this Plan to reflect or related to such
changes or distributions and to modify any other terms of
outstanding Awards, including modifications of performance goals
and changes in the length of Performance Periods. Subject to
Section 16.3, the determination of the Committee as to the
foregoing adjustments, if any, shall be conclusive and binding
on Participants under this Plan.
Subject to the provisions of Article 16 and notwithstanding
anything else herein to the contrary, without affecting the
number of Shares reserved or available hereunder, the Committee
may authorize the issuance or assumption of benefits under this
Plan in connection with any merger, consolidation, acquisition
of property or stock, or reorganization upon such terms and
conditions as it may deem appropriate (including, but not
limited to, a conversion of equity awards into Awards under this
Plan in a manner consistent with paragraph 53 of FASB
Interpretation No. 44), subject to compliance with the
rules under Code Sections 422 and 424, as and where
applicable.
Article 5.
Eligibility and Participation
5.1 Eligibility. Individuals
eligible to participate in this Plan include all Employees,
Directors and Independent Marketing Agents.
5.2 Actual Participation.
Subject to the provisions of this Plan, the Committee may, from
time to time, select from all eligible individuals, those
individuals to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine,
in its sole discretion, the nature of, any and all terms
permissible by law, and the amount of each Award.
Article 6.
Stock Options
6.1 Grant of Options.
Subject to the terms and provisions of this Plan, Options may be
granted to Participants in such number, and upon such terms, and
at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the
Committee, in its sole discretion; provided that ISOs may be
granted only to eligible Employees of the Company or of any
parent or subsidiary corporation (as permitted under Code
Sections 422 and 424).
C-6
6.2 Award Agreement. Each
Option grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall
specify the Option Price, the maximum duration of the Option,
the number of Shares to which the Option pertains, the
conditions upon which an Option shall become vested and
exercisable, and such other provisions as the Committee shall
determine which are not inconsistent with the terms of this
Plan. The Award Agreement also shall specify whether the Option
is intended to be an ISO or an NQSO.
6.3 Option Price. The Option
Price for each grant of an Option under this Plan shall be
determined by the Committee in its sole discretion and shall be
specified in the Award Agreement; provided, however, the Option
Price on the date of grant must be at least equal to one hundred
percent (100%) of the FMV of the Shares as determined on the
date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the price at which
shares of stock may be purchased under an ISO granted to a
Participant who is a ten-percent owner shall not be less than
one hundred ten percent (110%) of the FMV of the Shares as
determined on the date of grant. For this purpose, a
ten-percent owner shall mean a person who, at the
time the ISO is granted, owns stock with more than ten percent
(10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock
of the Company.
6.4 Term of Options. Each
Option granted to a Participant shall expire at such time as the
Committee shall determine at the time of grant; provided,
however, no Option shall be exercisable later than the tenth
(10th) anniversary date of its grant. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the period during which an ISO may be exercised by a
ten percent owner shall expire not later than five years from
the date the ISO is granted.
6.5 Exercise of Options.
Options granted under this Article 6 shall be exercisable
at such times and be subject to such restrictions and conditions
as the Committee shall in each instance approve, which terms and
restrictions need not be the same for each grant or for each
Participant.
6.6 Payment. Options granted
under this Article 6 shall be exercised by the delivery of
a notice of exercise to the Company or an agent designated by
the Company in a form specified or accepted by the Committee, or
by complying with any alternative procedures which may be
authorized by the Committee, setting forth the number of Shares
with respect to which the Option is to be exercised, accompanied
by full payment for the Shares.
A condition of the issuance of the Shares as to which an Option
shall be exercised shall be the payment of the Option Price. The
Option Price of any Option shall be payable to the Company in
full either: (a) in cash or its equivalent; (b) by
tendering (either by actual delivery or attestation) previously
acquired Shares having an aggregate Fair Market Value at the
time of exercise equal to the Option Price (provided that except
as otherwise determined by the Committee, the Shares that are
tendered must have been held by the Participant for at least six
(6) months (or such other period, if any, as the Committee
may permit) prior to their tender to satisfy the Option Price if
acquired under this Plan or any other compensation plan
maintained by the Company or have been purchased on the open
market); (c) by a cashless exercise (broker-assisted
exercise) through a same day sale commitment;
(d) by a combination of (a), (b), and (c); or (e) any
other method approved or accepted by the Committee in its sole
discretion.
Subject to any governing rules or regulations, as soon as
practicable after receipt of written notification of exercise
and full payment (including satisfaction of any applicable tax
withholding), the Company shall deliver to the Participant
evidence of [book entry Shares], or upon the Participants
request, Share certificates in an appropriate amount based upon
the number of Shares purchased under the Option(s).
Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, all payments under
all of the methods indicated above shall be paid in United
States dollars.
6.7 Restrictions on Share
Transferability. The Committee may impose such restrictions
on any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option
granted under this Article 6 as it may deem advisable,
including, without limitation, minimum holding period
requirements, restrictions under applicable federal securities
laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market
upon which such Shares are then listed and/or traded, or under
any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to such Shares.
6.8 Termination of
Employment. Each Participants Award Agreement shall
set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the
right to exercise the Option following termination of the
Participants
C-7
employment or provision of services to the Company, its
Associates, and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such
provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the
Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into
with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Options
issued pursuant to this Article 6, and may reflect
distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
6.9 Notification of
Disqualifying Disposition. If any Participant shall make any
disposition of Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of an ISO
under the circumstances described in Code Section 421(b)
(relating to certain disqualifying dispositions), such
Participant shall notify the Company of such disposition within
ten (10) days thereof.
Article 7.
Stock Appreciation Rights
7.1 Grant of SARs. Subject
to the terms and conditions of this Plan, SARs may be granted to
Participants at any time and from time to time as shall be
determined by the Committee. The Committee may grant
Freestanding SARs, Tandem SARs, or any combination of these
forms of SARs.
Subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, the Committee
shall have complete discretion in determining the number of SARs
granted to each Participant and, consistent with the provisions
of this Plan, in determining the terms and conditions pertaining
to such SARs.
The Grant Price for each grant of a Freestanding SAR shall be
determined by the Committee and shall be specified in the Award
Agreement; provided, however, the Grant Price on the date of
grant must be at least equal to one hundred percent (100%) of
the FMV of the Shares as determined on the date of grant. The
Grant Price of Tandem SARs shall be equal to the Option Price of
the related Option.
7.2 SAR Agreement. Each SAR
Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall
specify the Grant Price, the term of the SAR, and such other
provisions as the Committee shall determine.
7.3 Term of SAR. The term of
an SAR granted under this Plan shall be determined by the
Committee, in its sole discretion, and except as determined
otherwise by the Committee and specified in the SAR Award
Agreement, no SAR shall be exercisable later than the tenth
(10th) anniversary date of its grant.
7.4 Exercise of Freestanding
SARs. Freestanding SARs may be exercised upon whatever terms
and conditions the Committee, in its sole discretion, imposes.
7.5. Exercise of Tandem
SARs. Tandem SARs may be exercised for all or part of the
Shares subject to the related Option upon the surrender of the
right to exercise the equivalent portion of the related Option.
A Tandem SAR may be exercised only with respect to the Shares
for which its related Option is then exercisable.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the
contrary, with respect to a Tandem SAR granted in connection
with an ISO: (a) the Tandem SAR will expire no later than
the expiration of the underlying ISO; (b) the value of the
payout with respect to the Tandem SAR may be for no more than
one hundred percent (100%) of the excess of the Fair Market
Value of the Shares subject to the underlying ISO at the time
the Tandem SAR is exercised over the Option Price of the
underlying ISO; and (c) the Tandem SAR may be exercised
only when the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to the ISO
exceeds the Option Price of the ISO.
7.6 Settlement of SAR
Amount. Subject to Section 19.11 herein, upon the
exercise of an SAR, a Participant shall be entitled to receive
payment from the Company of Shares in an amount determined by
multiplying:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The excess of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of
exercise over the Grant Price, less applicable tax withholding;
by |
|
|
(b) |
The number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised. |
C-8
7.7 Termination of
Employment. Each Award Agreement shall set forth the extent
to which the Participant shall have the right to exercise the
SAR following termination of the Participants employment
with or provision of services to the Company, its Associates,
and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions
shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee,
shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with
Participants, need not be uniform among all SARs issued pursuant
to this Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons
for termination.
7.8 Other Restrictions. The
Committee shall impose such other conditions and/or restrictions
on any Shares received upon exercise of an SAR granted pursuant
to this Plan as it may deem advisable or desirable. These
restrictions may include, but shall not be limited to, a
requirement that the Participant hold the Shares received upon
exercise of an SAR for a specified period of time.
Article 8.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
8.1 Grant of Restricted Stock or
Restricted Stock Units. Subject to the terms and provisions
of this Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time,
may grant Shares of Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock
Units to Participants in such amounts as the Committee shall
determine. Restricted Stock Units shall be similar to Restricted
Stock except that no Shares are actually awarded to the
Participant on the date of grant.
8.2 Restricted Stock or
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Each Restricted Stock
and/or Restricted Stock Unit grant shall be evidenced by an
Award Agreement that shall specify the Period(s) of Restriction,
the number of Shares of Restricted Stock or the number of
Restricted Stock Units granted, and such other provisions as the
Committee shall determine.
8.3 Other Restrictions. The
Committee shall impose such other conditions and/or restrictions
on any Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units
granted pursuant to this Plan as it may deem advisable
including, without limitation, a requirement that Participants
pay a stipulated purchase price for each Share of Restricted
Stock or each Restricted Stock Unit, restrictions based upon the
achievement of specific performance goals, time-based
restrictions on vesting following the attainment of the
performance goals, time-based restrictions, restrictions under
applicable laws or under the requirements of any stock exchange
or market upon which such Shares are listed or traded, and/or
holding requirements or sale restrictions placed on the Shares
by the Company upon vesting of such Restricted Stock or
Restricted Stock Units.
To the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, the Company
may retain the certificates representing Shares of Restricted
Stock in the Companys possession until such time as all
conditions and/or restrictions applicable to such Shares have
been satisfied or lapse.
Except as otherwise provided in this Article 8, Shares of
Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock Award shall
become freely transferable by the Participant after all
conditions and restrictions applicable to such Shares have been
satisfied or lapse (including satisfaction of any applicable tax
withholding obligations), and Restricted Stock Units shall be
paid in cash, Shares, or a combination of cash and Shares as the
Committee, in its sole discretion shall determine.
8.4 Certificate Legend. In
addition to any legends placed on certificates pursuant to
Section 8.3, each certificate representing Shares of
Restricted Stock granted pursuant to this Plan may bear a legend
such as the following or as otherwise determined by the
Committee in its sole discretion:
The sale or transfer of Shares of stock represented by this
certificate, whether voluntary, involuntary, or by operation of
law, is subject to certain restrictions on transfer as set forth
in the MGM MIRAGE 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and in the
associated Award Agreement. A copy of this Plan and such Award
Agreement may be obtained from MGM MIRAGE.
8.5 Voting Rights. Unless
otherwise determined by the Committee and set forth in a
Participants Award Agreement, to the extent permitted or
required by law, as determined by the Committee, Participants
C-9
holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may be
granted the right to exercise full voting rights with respect to
those Shares during the Period of Restriction. A Participant
shall have no voting rights at any time with respect to any
Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder.
8.6 Termination of
Employment. Each Award Agreement shall set forth the extent
to which the Participant shall have the right to retain
Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units following
termination of the Participants employment with or
provision of services to the Company, its Associates, and/or its
Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be
determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be
included in the Award Agreement entered into with each
Participant, need not be uniform among all Shares of Restricted
Stock or Restricted Stock Units issued pursuant to this Plan,
and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for
termination.
8.7 Section 83(b)
Election. The Committee may provide in an Award Agreement
that the Award of Restricted Stock is conditioned upon the
Participant making or refraining from making an election with
respect to the Award under Code Section 83(b). If a
Participant makes an election pursuant to Code
Section 83(b) concerning a Restricted Stock Award, the
Participant shall be required to file promptly a copy of such
election with the Company.
Article 9.
Performance Units/ Performance Shares
9.1 Grant of Performance Units/
Performance Shares. Subject to the terms and provisions of
this Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may
grant Performance Units and/or Performance Shares to
Participants in such amounts and upon such terms as the
Committee shall determine.
9.2 Value of Performance Units/
Performance Shares. Each Performance Unit shall have an
initial value that is established by the Committee at the time
of grant. Each Performance Share shall have an initial value
equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant.
The Committee shall set performance goals in its discretion
which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will
determine the value and/or number of Performance Units/
Performance Shares that will be paid out to the Participant.
9.3 Earning of Performance
Units/ Performance Shares. Subject to the terms of this
Plan, after the applicable Performance Period has ended, the
holder of Performance Units/ Performance Shares shall be
entitled to receive payout on the value and number of
Performance Units/ Performance Shares earned by the Participant
over the Performance Period, to be determined as a function of
the extent to which the corresponding performance goals have
been achieved.
9.4 Form and Timing of Payment
of Performance Units/ Performance Shares. Payment of earned
Performance Units/ Performance Shares shall be as determined by
the Committee and as evidenced in the Award Agreement. Subject
to the terms of this Plan, the Committee, in its sole
discretion, may pay earned Performance Units/ Performance Shares
in the form of cash or in Shares (or in a combination thereof)
equal to the value of the earned Performance Units/ Performance
Shares at the close of the applicable Performance Period, or as
soon as practicable after the end of the Performance Period. Any
Shares may be granted subject to any restrictions deemed
appropriate by the Committee. The determination of the Committee
with respect to the form of payout of such Awards shall be set
forth in the Award Agreement pertaining to the grant of the
Award.
9.5 Termination of
Employment. Each Award Agreement shall set forth the extent
to which the Participant shall have the right to retain
Performance Units and/or Performance Shares following
termination of the Participants employment with or
provision of services to the Company, its Associates, and/or its
Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be
determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be
included in the Award Agreement entered into with each
Participant, need not be uniform among all Awards of Performance
Units or Performance Shares issued pursuant to this Plan, and
may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
C-10
Article 10.
Other Stock-Based Awards
10.1 Other Stock-Based
Awards. The Committee may grant other types of equity-based
or equity-related Awards not otherwise described by the terms of
this Plan (including the grant or offer for sale of unrestricted
Shares) in such amounts and subject to such terms and
conditions, as the Committee shall determine. Such Awards may
involve the transfer of actual Shares to Participants, and may
include, without limitation, Awards designed to comply with or
take advantage of the applicable local laws of jurisdictions
other than the United States.
10.2 Value of Other Stock-Based
Awards. Each Other Stock-Based Award shall be expressed in
terms of Shares or units based on Shares, as determined by the
Committee. The Committee may establish performance goals in its
discretion. If the Committee exercises its discretion to
establish performance goals, the number and/or value of Other
Stock-Based Awards that will be paid out to the Participant will
depend on the extent to which the performance goals are met.
10.4 Payment of Other
Stock-Based Awards. Payment, if any, with respect to an
Other Stock-Based Award shall be made in accordance with the
terms of the Award, in cash or Shares as the Committee
determines.
10.5 Termination of
Employment. The Committee shall determine the extent to
which the Participant shall have the right to receive Other
Stock-Based Awards following termination of the
Participants employment with or provision of services to
the Company, its Associates, and/or its Subsidiaries, as the
case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole
discretion of the Committee, and may be included in an agreement
entered into with each Participant, but need not be uniform
among all Other Stock-Based Awards issued pursuant to the Plan,
and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for
termination.
Article 11.
Transferability of Awards
11.1 Transferability of
Incentive Stock Options. No ISO granted under this Plan may
be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated
or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent
and distribution. Further, all ISOs granted to a Participant
under Article 6 shall be exercisable during his or her
lifetime only by such Participant.
11.2 All Other Awards.
Except for any Permitted Transfers provided for in a
Participants Award Agreement, which Permitted Transfers
may be subject to additional restrictions determined by the
Committee and as set forth in the Award Agreement, no other
Award granted under this Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged,
assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by
will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Further, except
with respect to interests in Awards which have been subject to a
Permitted Transfer provided for in a Participants Award
Agreement, all Awards granted to a Participant under this Plan
shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such
Participant. With respect to those Awards (other than ISOs), if
any, that are subject to Permitted Transfers, references in this
Plan to exercise or payment related to such Awards by or to the
Participant shall be deemed to include, as determined by the
Committee, the Participants Family Members to whom such
Permitted Transfers were made.
C-11
Article 12.
Performance Measures
12.1 Performance Measures.
The performance goals upon which the payment or vesting of an
Award to a Covered Employee that is intended to qualify as
Performance-Based Compensation shall be limited to the following
Performance Measures:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Net earnings or net income (before or after taxes); |
|
|
(b) |
Earnings per share; |
|
|
(c) |
Net sales or revenue growth; |
|
|
(d) |
Net operating profit; |
|
|
(e) |
Return measures (including, but not limited to, return on
assets, capital, invested capital, equity, sales, or revenue); |
|
|
(f) |
Cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow,
free cash flow, cash flow return on equity, and cash flow return
on investment); |
|
|
(g) |
Earnings before or after taxes, interest, depreciation, and/or
amortization; |
|
|
(h) |
Gross or operating margins; |
|
|
(i) |
Productivity ratios; |
|
|
(j) |
Share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and
total shareholder return); |
|
|
(k) |
Expense targets; |
|
|
(l) |
Margins; |
|
|
(m) |
Operating efficiency; |
|
|
(n) |
Market share; |
|
|
(o) |
Customer satisfaction; |
|
|
(p) |
Working capital targets; and |
|
|
(q) |
Economic value added or EVA® (net operating profit after
tax minus the sum of capital multiplied by the cost of capital). |
Any Performance Measure(s) may be used to measure the
performance of the Company, Subsidiary, and/or Associate as a
whole or any business unit of the Company, Subsidiary, and/or
Associate or any combination thereof, as the Committee may deem
appropriate, or any of the above Performance Measures as
compared to the performance of a group of comparator companies,
or published or special index that the Committee, in its sole
discretion, deems appropriate, or the Company may select
Performance Measure (j) above as compared to various stock
market indices. The Committee also has the authority to provide
for accelerated vesting of any Award based on the achievement of
performance goals pursuant to the Performance Measures specified
in this Article 12.
12.2 Evaluation of
Performance. The Committee may provide in any such Award
that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude any of
the following events that occurs during a Performance Period:
(a) asset write-downs, (b) litigation or claim
judgments or settlements, (c) the effect of changes in tax
laws, accounting principles, or other laws or provisions
affecting reported results, (d) any reorganization and
restructuring programs, (e) extraordinary nonrecurring
items as described in Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 30 and/or in managements discussion and analysis
of financial condition and results of operations appearing in
the Companys annual report to shareholders for the
applicable year, (f) acquisitions or divestitures, and
(g) foreign exchange gains and losses. To the extent such
inclusions or exclusions affect
C-12
Awards to Covered Employees, they shall be prescribed in a form
that meets the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for
deductibility.
12.3 Adjustment of
Performance-Based Compensation. Awards that are intended to
qualify as Performance-Based Compensation may not be adjusted
upward. The Committee shall retain the discretion to adjust such
Awards downward, either on a formula or discretionary basis or
any combination, as the Committee determines.
12.4 Committee Discretion.
In the event that applicable tax and/or securities laws change
to permit Committee discretion to alter the governing
Performance Measures without obtaining stockholder approval of
such changes, the Committee shall have sole discretion to make
such changes without obtaining stockholder approval. In
addition, in the event that the Committee determines that it is
advisable to grant Awards that shall not qualify as
Performance-Based Compensation, the Committee may make such
grants without satisfying the requirements of Code
Section 162(m) and base vesting on Performance Measures
other than those set forth in Section 12.1.
Article 13.
Dividend Equivalents
Any Participant selected by the Committee may be granted
dividend equivalents based on the dividends declared on Shares
that are subject to any Award, to be credited as of dividend
payment dates, during the period between the date the Award is
granted and the date the Award is exercised, vests or expires,
as determined by the Committee. Such dividend equivalents shall
be converted to cash or additional Shares by such formula and at
such time and subject to such limitations as may be determined
by the Committee.
Article 14.
Beneficiary Designation
Each Participant under this Plan may, from time to time, name
any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently
or successively) to whom any benefit under this Plan is to be
paid in case of his death before he receives any or all of such
benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior
designations by the same Participant, shall be in a form
prescribed by the Committee, and will be effective only when
filed by the Participant in writing with the Company during the
Participants lifetime. In the absence of any such
beneficiary designation, benefits remaining unpaid or rights
remaining unexercised at the Participants death shall be
paid or exercised by the Participants executor,
administrator, or legal representative.
Article 15.
Rights of Participants
15.1 Employment. Nothing in
this Plan or an Award Agreement shall interfere with or limit in
any way the right of the Company, its Associates, and/or its
Subsidiaries, to terminate any Participants employment or
service on the Board or to the Company at any time or for any
reason not prohibited by law, nor confer upon any Participant
any right to continue his employment or service as a Director or
Independent Marketing Agent for any specified period of time.
Neither an Award nor any benefits arising under this Plan shall
constitute an employment contract with the Company, its
Associates, and/or its Subsidiaries and, accordingly, subject to
Articles 3 and 16, this Plan and the benefits
hereunder may be terminated at any time in the sole and
exclusive discretion of the Committee without giving rise to any
liability on the part of the Company, its Associates, and/or its
Subsidiaries.
15.2 Participation. No
individual shall have the right to be selected to receive an
Award under this Plan, or, having been so selected, to be
selected to receive a future Award.
C-13
15.3 Rights as a
Stockholder. Except as otherwise provided herein, a
Participant shall have none of the rights of a stockholder with
respect to Shares covered by any Award until the Participant
becomes the record holder of such Shares.
Article 16.
Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination
16.1 Amendment, Modification,
Suspension, and Termination. Subject to Section 16.3,
the Committee may, at any time and from time to time, alter,
amend, modify, suspend, or terminate this Plan and any Award
Agreement in whole or in part; provided, however, that, without
the prior approval of the Companys stockholders and except
as provided in Section 4.4, Options or SARs issued under
this Plan will not be repriced, replaced, or regranted through
cancellation, or by lowering the Option Price of a previously
granted Option or the Grant Price of a previously granted SAR,
and no material amendment of this Plan shall be made without
stockholder approval if stockholder approval is required by law,
regulation, or stock exchange rule.
16.2 Adjustment of Awards Upon
the Occurrence of Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events.
The Committee may make adjustments in the terms and conditions
of, and the criteria included in, Awards in recognition of
unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation,
the events described in Section 4.4 hereof) affecting the
Company or the financial statements of the Company or of changes
in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles,
whenever the Committee determines that such adjustments are
appropriate in order to prevent unintended dilution or
enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be
made available under this Plan. The determination of the
Committee as to the foregoing adjustments, if any, shall be
conclusive and binding on Participants under this Plan.
16.3 Awards Previously
Granted. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to
the contrary (other than Section 16.4), no termination,
amendment, suspension, or modification of this Plan or an Award
Agreement shall adversely affect in any material way any Award
previously granted under this Plan, without the written consent
of the Participant holding such Award.
16.4 Amendment to Conform to
Law. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the
contrary, the Board of Directors may amend the Plan or an Award
Agreement, to take effect retroactively or otherwise, as deemed
necessary or advisable for the purpose of conforming the Plan or
an Award Agreement to any present or future law relating to
plans of this or similar nature (including, but not limited to,
Code Section 409A), and to the administrative regulations
and rulings promulgated thereunder.
Article 17.
Withholding
17.1 Tax Withholding. The
Company shall have the power and the right to deduct or
withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, the
minimum statutory amount to satisfy federal, state, and local
taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be
withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result
of this Plan.
17.2 Share Withholding. With
respect to withholding required upon the exercise of Options or
SARs, upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock and
Restricted Stock Units, or upon the achievement of performance
goals related to Performance Shares, or any other taxable event
arising as a result of an Award granted hereunder, Participants
may elect, subject to the approval of the Committee, to satisfy
the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having the
Company withhold Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date
the tax is to be determined equal to the minimum statutory total
tax that could be imposed on the transaction. All such elections
shall be irrevocable, made in writing, and signed by the
Participant, and shall be subject to any restrictions or
limitations that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems
appropriate.
C-14
Article 18.
Successors
All obligations of the Company under this Plan with respect to
Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to
the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the
result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation,
or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or
assets of the Company.
Article 19.
General Provisions
19.1 Legend. The
certificates for Shares may include any legend which the
Committee deems appropriate to reflect any restrictions on
transfer of such Shares.
19.2 Gender and Number.
Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine
term used herein also shall include the feminine, the plural
shall include the singular, and the singular shall include the
plural.
19.3 Severability. In the
event any provision of this Plan shall be held illegal or
invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not
affect the remaining parts of this Plan, and this Plan shall be
construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision
had not been included.
19.4 Requirements of Law.
The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under this
Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and
regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies
or national securities exchanges as may be required.
19.5 Delivery of Title. The
Company shall have no obligation to issue or deliver evidence of
title for Shares issued under this Plan prior to:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Obtaining any approvals from governmental agencies that the
Company determines are necessary or advisable; and |
|
|
(b) |
Completion of any registration or other qualification of the
Shares under any applicable national or foreign law or ruling of
any governmental body that the Company determines to be
necessary or advisable. |
19.6 Inability to Obtain
Authority. The inability of the Company to obtain authority
from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is
deemed by the Companys counsel to be necessary or
advisable to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares
hereunder, shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect
of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such
requisite authority shall not have been obtained.
19.7 Investment
Representations. The Committee may require any individual
receiving Shares pursuant to an Award under this Plan to
represent and warrant in writing that the individual is
acquiring the Shares for investment and without any present
intention to sell or distribute such Shares.
19.8 Employees Based Outside of
the United States. Notwithstanding any provision of this
Plan to the contrary, in order to comply with the laws in other
countries in which the Company, its Associates, and/or its
Subsidiaries operate or have Employees, Directors, or
Independent Marketing Agents, the Committee, in its sole
discretion, shall have the power and authority to:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Determine which Associates and Subsidiaries shall be covered by
this Plan; |
|
|
(b) |
Determine which Employees and/or Directors or Independent
Marketing Agents outside the United States are eligible to
participate in this Plan; |
|
|
(c) |
Modify the terms and conditions of any Award granted to
Employees and/or Directors or Independent Marketing Agents
outside the United States to comply with applicable foreign laws; |
C-15
|
|
|
|
(d) |
Establish subplans and modify exercise procedures and other
terms and procedures, to the extent such actions may be
necessary or advisable. Any subplans and modifications to Plan
terms and procedures established under this Section 19.8 by
the Committee shall be attached to this Plan document as
appendices; and |
|
|
(e) |
Take any action, before or after an Award is made, that it deems
advisable to obtain approval or comply with any necessary local
government regulatory exemptions or approvals. |
Notwithstanding the above, the Committee may not take any
actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would
violate applicable law.
19.9 Uncertificated Shares.
To the extent that this Plan provides for issuance of
certificates to reflect the transfer of Shares, the transfer of
such Shares may be effected on a noncertificated basis, to the
extent not prohibited by applicable law or the rules of any
stock exchange.
19.10 Unfunded Plan.
Participants shall have no right, title, or interest whatsoever
in or to any investments that the Company, and/or its
Subsidiaries, and/or its Associates may make to aid it in
meeting its obligations under this Plan. Nothing contained in
this Plan, and no action taken pursuant to its provisions, shall
create or be construed to create a trust of any kind, or a
fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Participant,
beneficiary, legal representative, or any other individual. To
the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payments
from the Company, its Subsidiaries, and/or its Associates under
this Plan, such right shall be no greater than the right of an
unsecured general creditor of the Company, a Subsidiary, or an
Associate, as the case may be. All payments to be made hereunder
shall be paid from the general funds of the Company, a
Subsidiary, or an Associate, as the case may be and no special
or separate fund shall be established and no segregation of
assets shall be made to assure payment of such amounts except as
expressly set forth in this Plan.
19.11 No Fractional Shares.
No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to
this Plan or any Award. The Committee shall determine whether
cash, Awards, or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu
of fractional Shares or whether such fractional Shares or any
rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.
19.12 Retirement and Welfare
Plans. Neither Awards made under this Plan nor Shares or
cash paid pursuant to such Awards may be included as
compensation for purposes of computing the benefits
payable to any Participant under the Companys or any
Subsidiarys or Associates retirement plans (both
qualified and non-qualified) or welfare benefit plans unless
such other plan expressly provides that such compensation shall
be taken into account in computing a Participants benefit.
19.13 Deferred Compensation.
No deferral of compensation (as defined under Code
Section 409A or guidance thereto) is intended under this
Plan. However, the Committee may permit deferrals of
compensation pursuant to the terms of a Participants Award
Agreement, a separate plan or a subplan which meets the
requirements of Code Section 409A and any related guidance.
Employees who are subject to Code Section 409A shall only
be granted Awards under this Plan that meet the requirements of
Code Section 409A or qualify for an exemption under Code
Section 409A or any related guidance. If any Employee who
is subject to Code Section 409A receives an Award that does
not comply with Code Section 409A or qualify for an
exemption thereto, such Award shall be null and void and shall
be deemed to have never been granted. Additionally, to the
extent any Award is subject to Code Section 409A,
notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the Plan
does not permit the acceleration of the time or schedule of any
distribution related to such Award, except as permitted by Code
Section 409A, the regulations thereunder, and/or the
Secretary of the United States Treasury.
19.14 Nonexclusivity of this
Plan. The adoption of this Plan shall not be construed as
creating any limitations on the power of the Board or Committee
to adopt such other compensation arrangements as it may deem
desirable for any Participant.
19.15 No Constraint on Corporate
Action. Nothing in this Plan shall be construed to:
(i) limit, impair, or otherwise affect the Companys
or a Subsidiarys or an Associates right or power to
make adjustments,
C-16
reclassifications, reorganizations, or changes of its capital or
business structure, or to merge or consolidate, or dissolve,
liquidate, sell, or transfer all or any part of its business or
assets; or, (ii) limit the right or power of the Company or
a Subsidiary or an Associate to take any action which such
entity deems to be necessary or appropriate.
19.16 Governing Law. The
Plan and each Award Agreement shall be governed by the laws of
the State of Delaware, excluding any conflicts or choice of law
rule or principle that might otherwise refer construction or
interpretation of this Plan to the substantive law of another
jurisdiction. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement,
recipients of an Award under this Plan are deemed to submit to
the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the federal or state
courts of Delaware, to resolve any and all issues that may arise
out of or relate to this Plan or any related Award Agreement.
C-17
|
|
|
|
|
This Proxy will be
voted as specified herein;
if no specification is made,
this Proxy will be voted for
Items 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
|
Please Mark Here
for Address Change or Comments
SEE REVERSE SIDE
|
|
o |
|
|
|
FOR all nominees
|
|
WITHHOLD |
named (except as
|
|
AUTHORITY |
marked to the
|
|
for all nominee(s) |
contrary)
|
|
named |
o
|
|
o |
Names of Nominees: 01 James D. Aljian, 02 Robert H. Baldwin, 03 Terry N. Christensen, 04 Willie D.
Davis, 05 Alexander M. Haig, Jr., 06 Alexis M. Herman, 07 Roland Hernandez, 08 Gary N. Jacobs, 09
Kirk Kerkorian, 10 J. Terrence Lanni, 11 George J. Mason, 12 James J. Murren, 13 Ronald M. Popeil,
14 John T. Redmond, 15 Daniel M. Wade, 16 Melvin B. Wolzinger, 17 Alex Yemenidjian.
(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), write that nominees
name on the following lines.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
2.
|
|
Amendment to the Companys
Certificate of Incorporation
to increase the number of
authorized shares of Common
Stock.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
3.
|
|
Approval of the Companys 2005
Omnibus Incentive Plan
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
4.
|
|
Ratification of the selection of independent auditors.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
Consenting to receive all future annual meeting materials and shareholder communications
electronically is simple and fast! Enroll today at www.melloninvestor.com/ISD for secure online
access to your proxy materials, statements, tax documents and other important shareholder
correspondence.
|
|
|
I plan to attend
the meeting
|
|
o |
Please sign your name exactly as it appears hereon. In the case of joint owners, each should sign.
If signing as executor, trustee, guardian or in any other representative capacity or as an officer
of a corporation, please indicate your full title as such.
- FOLD AND DETACH HERE -
Vote by Internet or Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time
the day prior to annual meeting day.
Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your
shares in the same manner
as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet
http://www.eproxy.com/mgg
Use the Internet to
vote your proxy.
Have your proxy
card in hand when
you access the web
site
|
|
OR
|
|
Telephone
1-800-435-6710
Use any touch-tone
telephone to vote
your proxy. Have
your proxy card in
hand when you
call.
|
|
OR
|
|
Mail
Mark, sign and date
your proxy card and
return it in the
enclosed
postage-paid
envelope. |
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone,
you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
MGM MIRAGE
Proxy for Annual Meeting of Stockholders
May 3, 2005
Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints TERRY CHRISTENSEN, WILLIE D. DAVIS and ALEXANDER M. HAIG, JR.,
and each of them, Proxies, with full power of substitution, to represent and vote all shares of
common stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders of MGM MIRAGE (the Company) to be held at Bellagio, 3600 Las Vegas
Boulevard South, Las Vegas, NV 89109 on May 3, 2005, at 10:00 a.m., and at any adjournments
thereof, upon any and all matters which may properly be brought before said meeting or any
adjournments thereof. The undersigned hereby revokes any and all proxies heretofore given with
respect to such meeting.
The Board of Directors
recommends a vote FOR Items 1, 2, 3 and 4.
(Continued and to be SIGNED on the other side)
Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)
- FOLD AND DETACH HERE -
Admission Ticket
Annual Meeting
of
MGM MIRAGE
May 3, 2005
10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time)
BELLAGIO
3600 LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD SOUTH
LAS VEGAS, NV 89109
This ticket must be presented at the door for entrance to the meeting.
|
|
|
Stockholder Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o WITH SPOUSE/SIGNIFICANT OTHER
|
|
o WITHOUT SPOUSE/SIGNIFICANT
OTHER |
(Please Print)
Agenda
1: To elect a Board of Directors;
2: To amend the Companys Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock;
3: To approve the
Companys 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
4: To consider and act upon the ratification of the selection of independent auditors; and
5: To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.