UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

x	Preliminary Proxy Statement
o	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o	Definitive Proxy Statement
o	Definitive Additional Materials
o	Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Apartment Investment and Management Company

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x	No fee required.
o	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)	Total fee paid:

o	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)	Filing Party:
	(4)	Date Filed:
		Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.

4582 SOUTH ULSTER STREET PARKWAY, SUITE 1100

DENVER, COLORADO 80237

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held On May 10, 2006

       You are cordially invited to attend the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Meeting”) of APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY (“Aimco” or the “Company”) to be held on Wednesday, May 10, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. at the principal executive offices of the Company at 4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237, for the following purposes:

      Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 3, 2006, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof.

      WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO BE AT THE MEETING, PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY, WHICH IS BEING SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. The proxy is revocable at any time prior to the exercise thereof by written notice to the Company, and stockholders who attend the Meeting may withdraw their proxies and vote their shares personally if they so desire.

      You may choose to vote your shares by using a toll-free telephone number or the Internet, as described on the proxy card. You may also mark, sign, date and mail your proxy in the envelope provided, and if you choose to vote your shares by telephone or the Internet, there is no need for you to mail your proxy card. Votes submitted via the Internet or by telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m. Central Time on May 9, 2006. The method by which you decide to vote will not limit your right to vote at the Meeting. If you later decide to attend the Meeting in person, you may vote your shares even if you previously have submitted a proxy by telephone, the Internet or by mail.

      The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly. Stockholders voting via the Internet should understand that there may be costs associated with electronic access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies, that must be borne by the stockholder.

March      , 2006

Table of Contents

APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY

4582 SOUTH ULSTER STREET PARKWAY, SUITE 1100

DENVER, COLORADO 80237

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 10, 2006

       This Proxy Statement is furnished to stockholders of Apartment Investment and Management Company (“Aimco” or the “Company”), a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), in connection with the solicitation of proxies in the form enclosed herewith for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the “Meeting”) to be held Wednesday, May 10, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. at the principal executive offices of the Company at 4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237, and at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof, for the purposes set forth in the Notice of Meeting. This Proxy Statement and the enclosed form of proxy are first being mailed to stockholders on or about April 5, 2006.

      This solicitation is made by mail on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company. Costs of the solicitation will be borne by the Company. Further solicitation of proxies may be made by telephone, fax or personal interview by the directors, officers and employees of the Company and its affiliates, who will not receive additional compensation for the solicitation. The Company has retained the services of The Altman Group, Inc., for an estimated fee of $4,500, plus out-of-pocket expenses, to assist in the solicitation of proxies from brokerage houses, banks, and other custodians or nominees holding stock in their names for others. The Company will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable expenses incurred by them in sending proxy material to stockholders.

      Holders of record of the Class A Common Stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) as of the close of business on the record date, March 3, 2006 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting. Each share of Common Stock entitles the holder to one vote. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 97,094,841 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

      Shares represented by proxies in the form enclosed, if the proxies are properly executed and returned and not revoked, will be voted as specified. Where no specification is made on a properly executed and returned proxy, the shares will be voted: FOR the election of all nominees for director; FOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Aimco’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006; and FOR the approval of the sale of up to an aggregate of 5,000 High Performance Partnership Units of AIMCO Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). To be voted, proxies must be filed with the Secretary of the Company prior to voting. Proxies may be revoked at any time before voting by filing a notice of revocation with the Secretary of the Company, by filing a later dated proxy with the Secretary of the Company or by voting in person at the Meeting. Shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions or “broker non-votes” (i.e., shares held by a broker or nominee that are represented at the Meeting, but with respect to which such broker or nominee is not empowered to vote on a particular proposal) will be counted as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.

      The Company’s 2005 Annual Report to Stockholders is being mailed with this Proxy Statement. The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237.

PROPOSAL 1:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

      Pursuant to Aimco’s Articles of Restatement (the “Charter”) and Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), directors are elected at each Annual Meeting of Stockholders and hold office for one year, and until their successors are duly elected and qualify. Aimco’s Bylaws currently authorize a Board consisting of not fewer than three nor more than nine persons.

      The nominees for election to the six positions on the Board selected by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board and proposed by the Board to be voted upon at the Meeting are James N. Bailey, Terry Considine, Richard S. Ellwood, J. Landis Martin, Thomas L. Rhodes and Michael A. Stein. Messrs. Bailey, Considine, Ellwood, Martin, Rhodes and Stein were elected to the Board at the last Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Messrs. Bailey, Ellwood, Martin, Rhodes and Stein are not employed by, or affiliated with, Aimco, other than by virtue of serving as directors of Aimco. Unless authority to vote for the election of directors has been specifically withheld, the persons named in the accompanying proxy intend to vote for the election of Messrs. Bailey, Considine, Ellwood, Martin, Rhodes and Stein to hold office as directors for a term of one year until their successors are elected and qualify at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All nominees have advised the Board that they are able and willing to serve as directors.

      If any nominee becomes unavailable for any reason (which is not anticipated), the shares represented by the proxies may be voted for such other person or persons as may be determined by the holders of the proxies (unless a proxy contains instructions to the contrary). In no event will the proxy be voted for more than six nominees.

      Directors will be elected by a favorable vote of a plurality of the shares of voting stock present and entitled to vote, in person or by proxy, at the Meeting. Accordingly, abstentions or broker non-votes as to the election of directors will not affect the election of the candidates receiving the plurality of votes. Unless instructed to the contrary in the proxy, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted FOR the election of the six nominees named above as directors.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH

OF THE SIX NOMINEES.

PROPOSAL 2:

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      The firm of Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2005, was selected by the Audit Committee to act in the same capacity for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, subject to ratification by Aimco’s stockholders. The aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, are described below under the caption “Principal Accountant Fees and Services.”

      Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Meeting and will be given the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and to respond to appropriate questions.

      The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast regarding the proposal is required to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP. Accordingly, abstentions or broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote on the proposal. Unless instructed to the contrary in the proxy, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted FOR the proposal to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION

OF THE SELECTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP.

PROPOSAL 3:

APPROVAL OF THE SALE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE UNITS

      As an additional step in furtherance of Aimco’s goal of increasing Aimco’s adjusted funds from operations, dividend income and share price by making equity ownership the primary economic motivation of its officers, in January 1998, AIMCO Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”) sold an aggregate of 15,000 Class I High Performance Partnership Units (the “Class I Units”) to a joint venture formed by 14 of Aimco’s officers and to three of Aimco’s independent directors. Based on the success of the Class I Units, in January 2001, the Board decided to offer to sell to employees of Aimco’s subsidiaries additional High Performance Units. In 2001, upon approval of stockholders, the Operating Partnership sold an aggregate of 15,000 of its Class II, III, and IV High Performance Partnership Units (the “Class II Units,” “Class III Units” and “Class IV Units”) to three limited liability companies formed by over 50 employees. In 2002, upon approval of stockholders, the Operating Partnership sold 4,398 of its Class V High Performance Partnership Units (the “Class V Units”) to a limited liability company formed by over 40 employees. In 2003, upon approval of stockholders, the Operating Partnership sold 5,000 of its Class VI High Performance Units (“Class VI Units”) to a limited liability company formed by approximately 40 employees. In 2004, upon the approval of stockholders, the Operating Partnership sold 4,109 of its Class VII High Performance Units (“Class VII Units”) to a limited liability company formed by approximately 22 employees. In 2005, upon the approval of stockholders, the Operating Partnership sold 5,000 of its Class VIII High Performance Units (“Class VIII Units”) to a limited liability company formed by 15 employees. Unlike Common Stock, common partnership units in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) and options to purchase Common Stock, the High Performance Units provide the following advantages to Aimco:

      The following table details the results of the High Performance Units that have been previously issued and for which the relevant measurement period has ended:

      As shown in the above table, the Class II Units, the Class III Units, the Class IV Units, the Class V Units and the Class VI Units were valued at $0, and therefore, the allocable investments made by the holders of $1.275 million, $1.793 million, $1.793 million, $937,601, and $985,000, respectively, were lost.

      In addition to the Class I Units, Class II Units, Class III Units, Class IV Units, Class V Units and Class VI Units described above, the Operating Partnership has issued 4,109 Class VII Units and 5,000 Class VIII Units, which have measurement periods of January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2006, and January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2007, respectively.

      The following table details the results of the High Performance Units that have been previously issued and for which the relevant measurement periods have not yet ended:

      As shown in the above table, the Class VII Units and the Class VIII Units were valued at $0 for the portion of the measurement period through December 31, 2005, however, the full measurement period ends on December 31, 2006, for the Class VII Units and on December 31, 2007 for the Class VIII Units.

      This year, the Board has decided to sell a new class of High Performance Units (the “Class IX High Performance Partnership Units” or “Class IX Units”), which have substantially the same characteristics as the Class VIII Units sold in 2005 except for a different three year measurement period. Up to 5,000 Class IX Units will be offered for sale. The specific characteristics of the Class IX Units are shown below:

      Aimco’s Board has determined, based upon the advice of an independent valuation expert, that the fair value of the 5,000 Class IX Units is $875,000 in the aggregate. The employees who are offered the opportunity to invest in the Class IX Units will do so through a senior management partnership, SMP 2009, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (the “SMP”), which will hold the Class IX Units until their valuation date. The SMP will be formed solely for the purpose of holding the Class IX Units until their valuation date, and the SMP will have no assets other than the Class IX Units. The terms of the limited liability company agreement of the SMP will restrict the employees’ ability to transfer their interests, and provides the SMP with a right to repurchase the interest of any employee at the original purchase price if such employee’s employment with Aimco is terminated for any reason (other than by death or disability) before the end of the measurement period. As with previous High Performance Units, the employees are investing through a limited liability company to ensure that there is no opportunity to profit from the ownership of High Performance Units before the valuation date.

      Aimco intends to offer the Class IX Units without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), in reliance upon Section 4(2) and Regulation D thereunder. Neither Aimco, the Operating Partnership, the SMP nor any other person or entity will offer or sell the securities by any form of general solicitation or general advertising. As indicated above, the aggregate price for the Class IX Units will be less than $1 million. Each employee-investor will receive the requisite information to make an informed investment decision. Each employee-investor must represent that he or she is acquiring the securities for himself or herself and not for any other person and that he or she understands that the securities have not been registered under the Act, and cannot be resold unless they are registered or an exemption from registration is available and that the certificates representing the securities will bear a restrictive legend to such effect. Interests in the SMP will be offered and sold only to a limited number of employees. The total number of purchasers (excluding “accredited investors” as defined in Rule 501 under the Act) will not exceed 35. Each purchaser who is not an accredited investor must have such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that he or she is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the investment.

      A family partnership controlled by Terry Considine is expected to own up to approximately 90% of the SMP (for HPU VIII, a Considine family partnership owns approximately 89% of the limited liability company). Other employees will own the remaining interests in the SMP; however, the total number of purchasers will not exceed 35 (excluding accredited investors). The $875,000 aggregate purchase price to be paid by the SMP for the Class IX Units will be funded with cash contributions from the employees participating in the SMP. Aimco will not make loans to executive officers to fund their cash contributions to the SMP, but Aimco may make loans to facilitate the participation of non-executive officers. These loans will be full recourse, will be payable through payroll deductions and will be required to be paid in full by October 31, 2006. To the extent that offerees elect not to participate, their interests will be offered to other participants on a proportionate basis.

      Holders of the Class IX Units will not be able to redeem their Class IX Units unless a change of control (as defined in the Operating Partnership’s Agreement of Limited Partnership) occurs. Prior to the date (the “Valuation Date”) that is the earlier of (i) January 1, 2009 or (ii) the date on which a change of control occurs, each Class IX Unit will entitle the holder thereof to receive distributions and allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership in the same amounts and at the same times (subject to certain exceptions upon liquidation of the Operating Partnership) as would a holder of 0.01 OP Units. If, on the Valuation Date, the cumulative Total Return of the Common Stock from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008 (the “Measurement Period”) exceeds 115% of the cumulative Total Return of a peer group index over the same period, and is at least the equivalent of a 36.8% cumulative Total Return over the three year period (the “Minimum Return”), then, on and after the Valuation Date, each Class IX Unit will convert into a number of Class IX Units equal to (i) the product of (A) 5% (subject to proration if fewer than 5,000 Class IX Units are sold) of the amount by which the cumulative Total Return of the Common Stock over the Measurement Period exceeds the greater of the Minimum Return or 115% of a peer group index (such excess being the “Outperformance Return”), multiplied by (B) the weighted average market value of Aimco’s equity capitalization (including Common Stock and OP Units but not preferred stock or preferred units), divided by (ii) the product of (A) the market value of one share of Common Stock on the Valuation Date and (B) the number of Class IX Units then outstanding. However, the new number of Class IX Units may not exceed 1.0% (subject to proration if fewer than 5,000 Class IX Units are sold) of the number of shares of Common Stock and OP Units outstanding, on a fully diluted basis (based on the sum of (i) the fully diluted number of shares used to determine Adjusted Funds From Operations (“AFFO”) per share and (ii) the fully diluted number of common OP Units and equivalents outstanding on the Valuation Date). If, on the Valuation Date, the cumulative Total Return of the Common Stock does not satisfy these criteria, then each Class IX Unit will convert into 0.01 of a Class IX Unit. On and after the Valuation Date, each Class IX Unit will entitle the holder thereof to receive distributions and allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership in the same amounts and at the same time (subject to certain exceptions upon liquidation of the Operating Partnership) as would a holder of one OP Unit. For purposes of determining the market value of Common Stock or OP Units as of any date, the average of the volume-weighted daily trading price of the Common Stock for the 20 consecutive trading days immediately preceding such date is used, except that the value of a share of Common Stock as of January 1, 2006, will be $38.54, the price used to determine the value of the

Class VI Units as of December 31, 2005 (which is the average of the volume-weighted daily trading price of the Common Stock for the 20 consecutive trading days immediately preceding December 31, 2005).

      The MSCI US REIT Index will be used as the peer group index (the “Peer Group Index”) for purposes of the new High Performance Units. The MSCI US REIT Index is a capitalization-weighted index, with dividends reinvested, of the most actively traded real estate investment trusts. As of January 3, 2006, the MSCI US REIT Index was comprised of 111 real estate investment trusts selected by Morgan Stanley Capital International Inc. The Board of Aimco has selected this index because it believes that it is the real estate investment trust index most widely reported and accepted among institutional investors. The Board may select a different index if it determines that the MSCI US REIT Index is no longer an appropriate comparison for Aimco; if the MSCI US REIT Index is not maintained throughout the Measurement Period; or for any other reason that the Board determines.

      “Total Return” means, for any security and for any period, the cumulative total return for such security over such period, as measured by (i) the sum of (a) the cumulative amount of dividends paid in respect of such security for such period (assuming that all cash dividends are reinvested in such security as of the payment date for such dividend based on the security price on the dividend payment date), and (b) an amount equal to (x) the security price at the end of such period, minus (y) the security price at the beginning of such period, divided by (ii) the security price at the beginning of the measurement period; provided, however, that if the foregoing calculation results in a negative number, the Total Return shall be equal to zero.

      The Class IX Units are subject to certain restrictions on transfer. The SMP may not transfer the Class IX Units until after the Valuation Date, and then only to its participants or to one of their family members (or a family-owned entity). Individuals may not transfer High Performance Units except to a family member (or a family-owned entity) or in the event of death or disability. The Class IX Units are not convertible into Common Stock. However, in the event of a change of control of Aimco, holders of the Class IX Units will have redemption rights similar to those of holders of OP Units. Upon the occurrence of a change of control, any holder of the Class IX Units may, subject to certain restrictions, require the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a portion of the Class IX Units held by such party in exchange for a cash payment per unit equal to their market value at the time of redemption. However, in the event that any Class IX Units are tendered for redemption, the Operating Partnership’s obligation to pay the redemption price is subject to the prior right of Aimco to acquire such Class IX Units in exchange for an equal number of shares of Common Stock (subject to certain adjustments).

      Although Aimco does not believe that the sale of the Class IX Units will have an anti-takeover effect, the Class IX Units could increase the potential cost of acquiring control of Aimco and thereby discourage an attempt to take control of Aimco. However, the Board is not aware of any attempt to take control of Aimco and the Board has not approved the sale of the Class IX Units with the intention of discouraging any such attempt.

      If Aimco’s Total Return over the Measurement Period exceeds 115% of the Total Return of the MSCI US REIT Index and exceeds the Minimum Return of 36.8% over three years, then the holders of the Class IX Units could be entitled to as much as 1% (percentage based on the valuation date and is subject to proration if fewer than 5,000 Class IX Units are sold) of future distributions made by the Operating Partnership. This would have a dilutive effect on future earnings per share of Common Stock, and on Aimco’s equity ownership in the Operating Partnership after the Valuation Date. However, the maximum dilutive effect for the new class of High Performance Units will be 1.0% of the number of shares of Common Stock and OP Units outstanding, on a fully diluted basis (based on the sum of (i) the fully diluted number of shares used to determine AFFO per share and (ii) the fully diluted number of common OP Units and equivalents outstanding on the Valuation Date).

      The table below illustrates the value of the Class IX Units on the Valuation Date under different circumstances. The table demonstrates the value of the Class IX Units at given prices for Common Stock and the total return calculated at that price compared to both the Minimum Return and 115% of the peer group total return. For purposes of this illustration, the “value” of the Class IX Units is calculated by multiplying (a) 5% of the Outperformance Return, by (b) the weighted average market value of Aimco’s equity

capitalization (including Common Stock and OP Units not held by Aimco) over the Measurement Period. However, this determination of value does not represent the actual fair market value of the Class IX Units on the Valuation Date because the Class IX Units are subject to substantial restrictions on transfer and, in the absence of a change of control, do not entitle the holders thereof to any redemption rights. Except as otherwise indicated, it is assumed, for purposes of the illustration, that the Valuation Date is January 1, 2009, and the weighted average market value of outstanding equity (Common Stock and OP Units not held by Aimco) during the Measurement Period is $4.088 billion. Other important assumptions are set forth in the footnotes below the following table.

      The table below is for illustrative purposes only and there can be no assurance that actual outcomes will be within the ranges used. Some of the factors that could affect the results set forth in the table are the Total Return of the Common Stock relative to the Total Return of the MSCI US REIT Index, and the market value of the average outstanding equity of Aimco during the Measurement Period. These factors may be affected by general economic conditions, local real estate conditions and the dividend policy of Aimco.

Class IX High Performance Partnership Units — Three Year Program

Valuation Analysis as of December 31, 2005

      5,000 Class IX High Performance Partnership Units

      $875,000 Cash proceeds to Company from initial investment(1)

      The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast regarding the proposal is required for approval of the sale of the new High Performance Units, provided that the total votes cast on the proposal represents over 50% in interest of all securities entitled to vote on the proposal. For purposes of the vote on the sale of the new High Performance Units, abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against the proposal, unless holders of more than 50% in interest of all securities entitled to vote on the proposal cast votes, in which event broker non-votes will not have any effect on the result of the vote. Unless instructed to the contrary in the proxy, the shares represented by proxies will be voted FOR the proposal to approve the sale of the new High Performance Units.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE

SALE OF THE HIGH PERFORMANCE UNITS.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

      The executive officers of the Company and the nominees for election as directors of the Company, their ages, dates they were first elected an executive officer or director, and their positions with the Company or on the Board are set forth below.

      The following is a biographical summary for at least the past five years of the current directors and executive officers of the Company.

      Terry Considine. Mr. Considine has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since July 1994. Mr. Considine also serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Land Lease, Inc., another publicly held real estate investment trust. Mr. Considine devotes substantially all of his time to his responsibilities at Aimco.

      Jeffrey W. Adler. Mr. Adler was appointed Executive Vice President — Conventional Property Operations in February 2004. Previously he served as Senior Vice President of Risk Management of Aimco from January 2002 until November 2002, when he added the responsibility of Senior Vice President, Marketing. Prior to joining Aimco, from 2000 to 2002, Mr. Adler was Vice President, Property/ Casualty for Channelpoint, a software company.

      Harry G. Alcock. Mr. Alcock was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer in October 1999. Mr. Alcock has had responsibility for acquisition and financing activities of the Company since

July 1994, serving as a Vice President from July 1996 to October 1997 and as a Senior Vice President from October 1997 to October 1999.

      Timothy J. Beaudin. Mr. Beaudin was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer in October 2005. Prior to joining Aimco and beginning in 1995, Mr. Beaudin was with Catellus Development Corporation, a San Francisco, California-based real estate investment trust. During his last five years at Catellus, Mr. Beaudin served as executive vice president, with management responsibility for development, construction and asset management.

      Miles Cortez. Mr. Cortez was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in August 2001. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Cortez was the senior partner of Cortez Macaulay Bernhardt & Schuetze LLC, a Denver law firm, from December 1997 through September 2001. He served as president of the Colorado Bar Association from 1996 to 1997 and the Denver Bar Association from 1982 to 1983.

      Randall J. Fein. Mr. Fein was appointed Executive Vice President in October 2003. He supports the conventional operations group with respect to Aimco’s student housing related portfolio, including its joint venture activities. From 1989 through 2003, Mr. Fein served as general partner of Income Apartment Investors L.P., and Texas First Properties L.P., which operated student and non-student housing.

      Patti K. Fielding. Ms. Fielding was appointed Executive Vice President — Securities and Debt in February 2003 and Treasurer in January 2005. She is responsible for debt financing and the treasury department. From January 2000 to February 2003, Ms. Fielding served as Senior Vice President — Securities and Debt. Ms. Fielding joined the Company as a Vice President in February 1997.

      Lance J. Graber. Mr. Graber was appointed Executive Vice President since October 1999 and focuses on transactions related to Aimco Capital’s portfolio of affordable properties in the eastern portion of the country. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Graber was a Director at Credit Suisse First Boston from 1994 to May 1999.

      Thomas M. Herzog. Mr. Herzog was appointed Executive Vice President in July 2005 and Chief Financial Officer in November 2005. In January 2004, Mr. Herzog joined Aimco as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to joining Aimco, Mr. Herzog was at GE Real Estate, serving as Chief Accounting Officer & Global Controller from April 2002 to January 2004 and as Chief Technical Advisor from March 2000 to April 2002. Prior to joining GE Real Estate, Mr. Herzog was at Deloitte & Touche LLP from 1990 until 2000.

      Paul J. McAuliffe. Mr. McAuliffe was appointed Executive Vice President in February 1999 and was appointed Chief Financial Officer in October 1999. Mr. McAuliffe stepped down as Chief Financial Officer in November 2005 and is currently serving in a senior advisory role supporting the Company in various capital markets activities. From May 1996 until he joined Aimco, Mr. McAuliffe was Senior Managing Director of Secured Capital Corp.

      James G. Purvis. Mr. Purvis was appointed Executive Vice President — Human Resources in February 2003. Prior to joining Aimco, from October 2000 to February 2003, Mr. Purvis served as the Vice President of Human Resources at SomaLogic, Inc. a privately held biotechnology company in Boulder, Colorado. From July 1997 to October 2000, Mr. Purvis was the principal consultant for O(3)C Global Organization Solutions, a global human resources strategy and technology consulting company based in Colorado and London.

      David Robertson. Mr. Robertson has been Executive Vice President since February 2002 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Aimco Capital since October 2002. Prior to joining the Company, from 1991 to 1996, Mr. Robertson was a member of the investment-banking group at Smith Barney. Since February 1996, Mr. Robertson has been Chairman of Robeks Corporation, a privately held chain of specialty food stores.

      Robert Y. Walker, IV. Mr. Walker was appointed Senior Vice President in August 2005 and became the Chief Accounting Officer in November 2005. From June 2002 until he joined Aimco, Mr. Walker served as senior vice president and chief financial officer at Miller Global Properties, LLC, a Denver-based private

equity, real estate fund manager. From May 1997 to June 2002, Mr. Walker was employed by GE Capital Real Estate, serving as Global Controller from May 2000 to June 2002.

      James N. Bailey. Mr. Bailey was first elected as a Director of the Company in June 2000 and is currently Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit and Compensation and Human Resources Committees. Mr. Bailey co-founded Cambridge Associates, LLC, an investment consulting firm, in 1973 and currently serves as its Senior Managing Director and Treasurer. He is also a director of The Plymouth Rock Company, SRB Corporation, Inc., Direct Response Corporation and Homeowners Direct Company, all four of which are insurance companies. In addition, he is a director of Getty Images, Inc., a publicly held company. He has also been a member of a number of Harvard University alumni affairs committees, including, the Overseers Nominating Committee and The Harvard Endowment Committee. Mr. Bailey is a member of the Massachusetts Bar and the American Bar Associations.

      Richard S. Ellwood. Mr. Ellwood was first elected as a Director of the Company in July 1994. Mr. Ellwood is currently a member of the Audit, Compensation and Human Resources, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Ellwood was the founder and President of R.S. Ellwood & Co., Incorporated, which he operated as a real estate investment banking firm until December 31, 2004. Prior to forming his firm, Mr. Ellwood had 31 years experience on Wall Street as an investment banker, serving as: Managing Director and senior banker at Merrill Lynch Capital Markets from 1984 to 1987; Managing Director at Warburg Paribas Becker from 1978 to 1984; general partner and then Senior Vice President and a director at White, Weld & Co. from 1968 to 1978; and in various capacities at J.P. Morgan & Co. from 1955 to 1968. Mr. Ellwood currently serves as a director of Felcor Lodging Trust, Incorporated, a publicly held company. He also serves as a trustee of the Diocesan Investment Trust of the Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey and as a member of the diocesan audit committee.

      J. Landis Martin. Mr. Martin was first elected as a Director of the Company in July 1994 and is currently Chairman of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee. Mr. Martin is a member of the Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Martin is also the Lead Independent Director of Aimco’s Board. Mr. Martin is the Founder and Managing Director of Platte River Ventures LLC, a private equity firm. In November 2005, Mr. Martin retired as Chairman and CEO of Titanium Metals Corporation, a publicly held integrated producer of titanium metals, where he served since January 1994. Mr. Martin served as President and CEO of NL Industries, Inc., a publicly held manufacturer of titanium dioxide chemicals, from 1987 to 2003. Mr. Martin is also a director of Halliburton Company, a publicly held provider of products and services to the energy industry and Crown Castle International Corporation, a publicly held wireless communications company.

      Thomas L. Rhodes. Mr. Rhodes was first elected as a Director of the Company in July 1994 and is currently a member of the Audit, Compensation and Human Resources, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Rhodes is Chairman of National Review magazine where he served as President since November 1992 and as a Director since 1988. From 1976 to 1992, he held various positions at Goldman, Sachs & Co., was elected a General Partner in 1986 and served as a General Partner from 1987 until November 1992. Mr. Rhodes is Chairman of the Board of Directors of The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation and Vice Chairman of American Land Lease, Inc., a publicly held real estate investment trust.

      Michael A. Stein. Mr. Stein was first elected as a Director of the Company in October 2004 and is currently the Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Stein is a member of the Compensation and Human Resources and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Stein is Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ICOS Corporation, a biotechnology company based in Bothell, Washington. He joined ICOS in January 2001. From October 1998 to September 2000, Mr. Stein was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nordstrom, Inc. From 1989 to September 1998, Mr. Stein served in various capacities with Marriott International, Inc., including Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1993 to 1998. Prior to joining Marriott, Mr. Stein spent 18 years at Arthur Andersen LLP, where he was a partner and served as the head of the Commercial Group within the Washington, D.C. office. Mr. Stein serves on the Board of Directors of Getty Images, Inc., a publicly held company, and the Board of Trustees of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Independence of Directors

      The Board has determined that to be considered independent, an outside director may not have a direct or indirect material relationship with Aimco or its subsidiaries (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). A material relationship is one that impairs or inhibits — or has the potential to impair or inhibit — a director’s exercise of critical and disinterested judgment on behalf of Aimco and its stockholders. In determining whether a material relationship exists, the Board considers, for example, whether the director or a family member is a current or former employee of the Company, family member relationships, compensation, business relationships and payments, and charitable contributions between Aimco and an entity with which a director is affiliated (as an executive officer, partner or substantial stockholder) and whether a director is a former employee of the Company. The Board consults with the Company’s counsel to ensure that such determinations are consistent with all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent director,” including but not limited to those set forth in the pertinent listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange as in effect from time to time.

      Consistent with these considerations, the Board affirmatively has determined that Messrs. Bailey, Ellwood, Martin, Rhodes and Stein are independent directors (collectively the “Independent Directors”).

Meetings and Committees

      The Board held four meetings during the year ended December 31, 2005. During 2005, no director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and any committees of the Board upon which he served. The Board has established standing audit, compensation and human resources, and nominating and corporate governance committees.

      The Corporate Governance Guidelines, as described below, provide that the Company generally expects that the Chairman of the Board will attend all annual and special meetings of the stockholders. Other members of the Board are not required to attend such meetings. One director, Mr. Considine, attended the Company’s 2005 annual meeting of stockholders. The Company will endeavor to schedule annual meetings of the stockholders to facilitate attendance by the directors.

     Audit Committee.

      The Audit Committee currently consists of the five Independent Directors, and the Audit Committee Chairman is Mr. Stein. The Audit Committee makes determinations concerning the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement (including the audit of the Company’s financial statements and the Company’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting), reviews the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm and considers the range of audit and non-audit fees. The Audit Committee also provides oversight for the Company’s financial reporting process, internal control over financial reporting and the Company’s internal audit function.

      Aimco’s Board has determined that the Company has at least one audit committee financial expert serving on the Audit Committee, and has designated Mr. Stein as an “audit committee financial expert.” Each member of the Audit Committee is independent, as that term is defined by Section 303.01 of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange relating to audit committees.

      The Audit Committee held nine meetings during the year ended December 31, 2005. The Audit Committee has a written charter that was adopted effective November 6, 2003, which charter is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com) and is also available in print to stockholders, upon written request to Aimco’s Corporate Secretary. As set forth in the Audit Committee’s charter, no director may serve as a member of the Audit Committee if such director serves on the audit committee of more than two other public companies, unless the Board determines that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such

director to effectively serve on the Audit Committee. No member of the Audit Committee serves on the audit committee of more than two other public companies.

      The Compensation and Human Resources Committee currently consists of the five Independent Directors, and the Compensation and Human Resources Committee Chairman is Mr. Martin. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee’s purposes are to: oversee the Company’s compensation and employee benefit plans and practices, including its executive compensation plans and its incentive-compensation and equity-based plans; and to direct the preparation of, and approve, a report on executive compensation to be included in the Company’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders or Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee held three meetings during the year ended December 31, 2005. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee has a written charter that was adopted effective January 29, 2004, which charter is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com) and is also available in print to stockholders, upon written request to Aimco’s Corporate Secretary.

     Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

      The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of the five Independent Directors, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman is Mr. Bailey. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s purposes are to: identify and recommend to the Board individuals qualified to serve on the board; advise the Board with respect to Board composition, procedures and committees; develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to Aimco and its management; and oversee evaluation of the Board and management (in conjunction with the Compensation and Human Resources Committee). The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings during the year ended December 31, 2005. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a written charter that was adopted effective March 8, 2004, which charter is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com) and is also available in print to stockholders, upon written request to Aimco’s Corporate Secretary.

      The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee selects nominees for director on the basis of, among other things, experience, knowledge, skills, expertise, integrity, ability to make independent analytical inquiries, understanding of Aimco’s business environment and willingness to devote adequate time and effort to Board responsibilities. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses the appropriate balance of criteria required of directors and makes recommendations to the Board. When formulating its Board membership recommendations, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers advice and recommendations from others as it deems appropriate. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider as nominees to the Board for election at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders, persons who are recommended by stockholders in writing, marked to the attention of Aimco’s Corporate Secretary, no later than September 30, 2006.

      The Board is responsible for nominating members for election to the Board and for filling vacancies on the Board that may occur between annual meetings of stockholders.

     Separate Sessions of Non-Management Directors.

      Aimco’s Corporate Governance Guidelines (described below) provide that the non-management directors shall meet in executive session without management on a regularly scheduled basis, but no less than four times per year. Mr. Martin has been designated as the Lead Independent Director who will preside at such executive sessions through February 2007. The non-management directors, which group is made up of the five Independent Directors, met in executive session without management four times during the year ended December 31, 2005.

Compensation of Directors

      In 2005, the Company awarded each of the Independent Directors 4,000 shares of Common Stock. The Independent Directors were each paid a fee of $1,000 for attendance at each meeting of the Board and a fee of $1,000 for attendance at each meeting of any committee thereof.

      Compensation for the Independent Directors in 2006 is an annual fee of 3,000 shares of Common Stock, which shares were awarded February 13, 2006, a fee of $1,000 for attendance at each meeting of the Board, and a fee of $1,000 for attendance at each meeting of any committee thereof. The Board reduced the number of shares granted to reflect the Company’s performance in 2005.

      Mr. Considine, who is not an Independent Director, does not receive any additional compensation for serving on the Board.

Code of Ethics

      Effective November 6, 2003, the Board adopted a code of ethics entitled “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” that applies to the members of the Board, all of Aimco’s executive officers and all employees of Aimco or its subsidiaries, including Aimco’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com). If, in the future, Aimco amends, modifies or waives a provision in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, rather than filing a Current Report on Form 8-K, Aimco intends to satisfy any applicable disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K by posting such information on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com), as necessary.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

      Effective March 8, 2004, the Board adopted and approved Corporate Governance Guidelines, which were reviewed and amended in February 2006. These guidelines are available on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com). In general, the Corporate Governance Guidelines address director qualification standards, director responsibilities, the lead independent director, director access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education, management succession, and an annual performance evaluation of the Board.

Compensation and Human Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

      The Compensation and Human Resources Committee consists of Messrs. Martin (Chairman), Bailey, Ellwood, Rhodes and Stein. Mr. Rhodes is Vice Chairman and a Director of American Land Lease, Inc. Mr. Considine, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Land Lease, Inc.

Communicating with the Board of Directors

      Any interested parties desiring to communicate with Aimco’s Board, the Lead Independent Director, any of the five Independent Directors, Aimco’s Chairman of the Board, any committee chairmen, or any committee members may directly contact such persons by directing such communications in care of Aimco’s Corporate Secretary. All communications received as set forth in the preceding sentence will be opened by the office of Aimco’s General Counsel for the sole purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to Aimco’s directors. Any contents that are not in the nature of advertising, promotions of a product or service, or patently offensive material will be forwarded promptly to the addressee. In the case of communications to the Board or any group or committee of directors, the General Counsel’s office will make sufficient copies of the contents to send to each director who is a member of the group or committee to which the envelope or e-mail is addressed.

      To contact Aimco’s Corporate Secretary, correspondence should be addressed as follows:

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS

      The Audit Committee oversees Aimco’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K with management including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. A written charter approved by the Audit Committee and ratified by the Board governs the Audit Committee.

      The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm, which is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles. The Audit Committee also has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61 relating to communication with audit committees. In addition, the Audit Committee has received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and letter required by Rule 3600T of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which adopts on an interim basis Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, relating to independence discussions with audit committees, has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence from the Company and its management, and has considered whether the independent registered public accounting firm’s provision of non-audit services to the Company is compatible with maintaining such firm’s independence.

      The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Audit Committee meets with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee held nine meetings during fiscal year 2005.

      None of the Audit Committee members have a relationship with the Company that might interfere with exercise of his independence from the Company and its management.

      In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements and audited assessment of internal control over financial reporting be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has also determined that provision by Ernst & Young LLP of other non-audit services is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLP’s independence. The Audit Committee and the Board have also recommended, subject to stockholder ratification, the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2006.

Date: March      , 2006

      The above report will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates the same by reference.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Principal Accountant Fees

      The aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 were approximately $10.48 million and $10.51 million, respectively, and are described below.

      Fees for audit services totaled approximately $6.97 million in 2005 and approximately $7.44 million in 2004. These amounts include fees associated with the annual audit of the financial statements of Aimco, its internal control over financial reporting (which includes procedures related to the implementation of the internal control provisions set forth in Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), and the financial statements of certain of its consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated investees. Fees for audit services also include fees for the reviews of Aimco’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), other SEC filings, equity or debt offerings, comfort letters and consents.

      Fees for audit-related services totaled approximately $0.84 million in 2005 and approximately $1.32 million in 2004. Audit-related services principally include various audit and attest work not required by statute or regulation, benefit plan audits, due diligence in connection with acquisitions, and accounting consultations.

      Fees billed for tax services, including tax compliance services for approximately 410 subsidiaries or affiliates of the Company, tax advice and tax planning totaled approximately $2.68 million in 2005 and approximately $1.72 million in 2004. The difference between the two amounts is substantially due to the timing of services rendered and related billing.

      Fees for all other services not included above totaled zero in 2005 and approximately $0.02 million in 2004, principally consisting of real estate advisory services. There were no fees billed or incurred in 2005 or 2004 related to financial information systems design and implementation.

      Included in the fees above are audit and tax compliance fees of $6.6 million and $5.7 million for 2005 and 2004, respectively, for services provided to consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships for which an Aimco subsidiary is the general partner. Audit services were provided to approximately 290 such partnerships and tax compliance services were provided to approximately 410 such partnerships during 2005.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies

      In 2003, the Audit Committee adopted the Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy (the “Pre-approval Policy”), which the Audit Committee reviewed and again approved, with minor modifications, in October 2005. The Pre-approval Policy describes the Audit, Audit-related, Tax and Other Permitted services that have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee, typically subject to a dollar limit of $25,000. The term of any general pre-approval is generally twelve (12) months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee considers a different period and states otherwise. At least annually, the Audit Committee will review and pre-approve the services that may be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee. In accordance with this review, the Audit Committee may add to or subtract from the list of general pre-approved services or modify the permissible dollar limit associated with pre-approvals. As set forth in the Pre-approval Policy, unless a type of service has received general pre-approval and is anticipated to be within the dollar limit associated with the

general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee if it is to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. For both types of pre-approval, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are consistent with the rules on independent registered public accounting firm independence. The Audit Committee will also consider whether the independent registered public accounting firm is best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient service, for reasons such as its familiarity with Aimco’s business, people, culture, accounting systems, risk profile and other factors, and whether the service might enhance Aimco’s ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. All such factors will be considered as a whole, and no one factor will necessarily be determinative. All of the services described above were approved pursuant to the annual engagement letter or in accordance with the Pre-approval Policy; none were approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of SEC Regulation S-X.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

      The following table sets forth certain information available to the Company, as of March 6, 2006, with respect to Aimco’s equity securities beneficially owned by (i) each director and nominee, the chief executive officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers”) who were serving as of March 6, 2006, and (ii) all directors and executive officers as a group. The table also sets forth certain information available to the Company, as of March 6, 2006, with respect to shares of Common Stock held by each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of such shares. This table does not reflect options that are not exercisable within 60 days. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities beneficially owned by that person. The business address of each of the following directors and executive officers is 4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237, unless otherwise specified.

COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS

      The five Independent Directors constitute the Compensation and Human Resources Committee (the “Committee”). The Committee determines the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer; reviews the decisions made by the Chief Executive Officer as to the compensation of other corporate officers holding the title of Executive Vice President and the Chief Accounting Officer (“Other Senior Management” and together with the Chief Executive Officer, “Senior Management”); reviews the general compensation and benefit practices of the Company; and administers the Company’s stock option and other stock related plans.

      In order to determine bonus compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and to review the decisions made by the Chief Executive Officer for bonus compensation for Other Senior Management, for 2005, the Committee first assessed the Company’s relative financial performance as compared to a peer group comprised of multi-family REITs and other REITs with market capitalization greater than $4 billion (collectively the “Peer Group”).

      The Committee’s policy for 2005 was that total compensation (base compensation plus bonus compensation) for each individual member of Senior Management should be at a level that reflected the Company’s financial performance relative to its Peer Group. If the Company’s relative financial performance was superior, total compensation for each individual member of Senior Management should reward that performance. If the Company’s relative financial performance was not superior, total compensation for each individual member of Senior Management should be at levels at or below the average of the Peer Group for each comparable position (or where no comparable position existed in the Peer Group, comparable positions in other industries considered relevant and helpful by the Committee). For example, with reference to individuals within Aimco Capital, the Committee considered companies and industries with transactional functions similar to those found in Aimco Capital.

      The Committee determined that the Company’s relative financial performance in 2005 was not superior to the average of its Peer Group, based primarily on a review of Total Return (dividend income plus share price appreciation), same store sales growth, and funds from operations and adjusted funds from operations. Because the Committee did not consider the Company’s financial performance superior, the Committee determined that total compensation for the Chief Executive Officer should be at or below the average level of total compensation for chief executive officer positions in the Peer Group. Similarly, in reviewing the Chief Executive Officer’s decisions regarding compensation for each individual member of Other Senior Management, the Committee sought adherence to this policy.

      In setting compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and reviewing the compensation for Other Senior Management for 2005, the Committee also considered, among other things the following qualitative and quantitative measures of the Company’s performance:

      The Committee also considered the following factors: individual performance of the Chief Executive Officer and each member of Other Senior Management; the alignment of Senior Management compensation with stockholder objectives for total return; reasonableness of compensation in consideration of all the facts, including total return, same store sales growth, FFO and AFFO; practices of the Peer Group or, where applicable, other industries considered relevant and helpful by the Committee; the size and complexity of the Company; and recruitment and retention of the Company’s Senior Management.

      In consideration of the qualitative and quantitative measures of the Company’s performance and the other factors indicated above and consistent with the Committee’s policy, the Committee set compensation for 2005 to Mr. Considine as follows:

      Mr. Considine’s total compensation for 2005 was comprised of base compensation of $0.5 million in cash and $2.5 million of bonus compensation, which was awarded in the form of an option to purchase 478,011 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $42.98 per share. This compared to total compensation for Mr. Considine for 2004 of $4,000,000, which was comprised of base compensation of $0.3 million in cash and $3.7 million of bonus compensation. The 2004 bonus compensation was awarded as a $1.0 million cash bonus and $2.7 million in equity, which was awarded in the form of 44,447 shares of restricted stock and an option to purchase 300,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $38.05 per share.

      The Committee also reviewed Mr. Considine’s decisions as to compensation of each individual member of Other Senior Management (including the Named Executive Officers — Messrs. Robertson, McAuliffe, Alcock and Graber). The Committee’s review was based on the qualitative and quantitative measures of the Company’s performance, the other factors indicated above and the Committee’s policy for 2005.

      As part of the process, the Committee also considered tally sheets setting forth all components of the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Other Senior Management, including base compensation, bonus compensation (including cash bonus and equity bonus compensation), accumulated realized and unrealized stock option and restricted stock gains, the dollar value to the executive and the cost to the Company of all perquisites and other personal benefits.

      With respect to 2005 bonus compensation in the form of equity awards, both the shares of restricted stock and the stock options were granted February 13, 2006, and vest ratably over five years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to accelerated vesting based on the achievement of a specified calendar year Funds From Operations target. For the purpose of calculating the number of shares of restricted stock to be granted, the dollars allocated to restricted stock were divided by $42.54 per share, which was the average of the high and low trading prices of Aimco’s Common Stock on the ten trading days preceding the grant date. For the purpose of calculating the number of shares subject to the stock options to be granted, the dollars allocated to stock options were divided by $5.23, which is the Black-Scholes valuation described below. The stock options have an exercise price per share of $42.98, which is equal to the grant date fair market value of the shares (per the terms of Aimco’s 1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan “fair market value” is defined as the closing price on the date prior to the grant date, or February 10, 2006).

      For accounting purposes, the compensation cost related to the stock options and restricted stock awarded as part of bonus compensation is determined in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“FAS 123R”) based on the number of shares subject to the stock options multiplied by the $5.23 per share Black-Scholes valuation and the number of shares of restricted stock multiplied by the closing price of Aimco’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date of $42.96. Such compensation cost generally will be recognized over the five-year vesting period, subject to accelerated recognition based on the achievement of the specified calendar year Funds From Operations target. The Committee valued the stock options awarded as part of bonus compensation at approximately $5.23 per underlying share, based on a calculation by a nationally recognized independent investment bank using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, which model may be used to measure compensation cost under FAS 123R.

      For 2006, the Committee approved Mr. Considine’s base salary of $600,000 in the form of a non-qualified stock option to purchase 115,385 shares, which grant was also made on February 13, 2006. The number of shares subject to the option was determined by dividing $600,000 by $5.20. This option grant will vest on the first anniversary of the grant date and shall be forfeited in its entirety and shall not be exercisable unless Aimco achieves $2.40 of adjusted funds from operations in 2006 (the “2006 AFFO Target”). The option has a term of ten years and has a strike price per share of $42.98, which is equal to the fair market value of Aimco’s Common Stock on the grant date. The Committee valued this option at approximately $5.20 per underlying share, based on a calculation by a nationally recognized independent investment bank using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. Base salary for 2006 for the other named executive officers is as follows: Mr. Robertson — $350,000; Mr. Alcock — $350,000; and Mr. Graber — $300,000. Mr. McAuliffe’s base salary for 2006 is $1 million, which amount is part of, and not in addition to, the arrangement previously disclosed on Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 25, 2005 (filed May 27, 2005).

      The Committee also made determinations of bonus compensation potential for 2006 based on achievement of the objectives of Aimco’s 2006 approved operating plan, which includes specific transaction-related goals and the 2006 AFFO Target, and achievement of specific individual objectives. If the plan is achieved, bonuses will be paid at a specific target achievement level as follows: Mr. Considine — $3.3 million; Mr. Robertson — $3.1 million; Mr. Alcock — $1.65 million; and Mr. Graber — $1.7 million. If the plan is not achieved, these target amounts will be decreased, and if the plan is exceeded or if individual performance so warrants, there may be discretionary increases to these target amounts. This bonus compensation may be paid in the form of cash, options or restricted stock.

Date: March      , 2006

      The above report will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing by Aimco under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that Aimco specifically incorporates the same by reference.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

      The following table sets forth the compensation earned with respect to each of Aimco’s last three fiscal years, ending on December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, for Aimco’s Chief Executive Officer and each of the Named Executive Officers.

OPTION/ SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

      Information on options granted in fiscal year 2005 to the Named Executive Officers is set forth in the following table.

AGGREGATED OPTION/ SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND

FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION/ SAR VALUES

      Information on option exercises during 2005 by the Named Executive Officers, and the value of unexercised options held by Named Executive Officers at December 31, 2005, is set forth in the following table.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

      Information on equity compensation plans as of the end of the 2005 fiscal year under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance is set forth in the following table.

EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS

      Mr. Considine receives annual cash compensation pursuant to an employment contract with the Company. The initial two-year term of this contract expired in July 1996 but the contract is automatically renewed for successive one-year terms unless Mr. Considine is terminated by the Company. The base salary payable under the employment contract is subject to annual review and adjustment by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee. For 2005, Mr. Considine received $500,000 in base salary. For 2006, Mr. Considine will receive his base salary in the form of a stock option instead of cash. Mr. Considine is also eligible for a bonus set by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee. See “Compensation and Human Resources Committee Report to Stockholders.”

      This employment contract provides that upon a change in control of the Company or a termination of employment under certain circumstances, Mr. Considine will be entitled to a payment equal to three times the average annual salary for the previous three years. The contract provides that during the term of the contract and for one year thereafter in no event will Mr. Considine engage in the acquisition, development, operation or management of other multifamily rental apartment properties outside of the Company. In addition, the contract provides that the Mr. Considine will not engage in any active or passive investment in property relating to multifamily rental apartment properties, with the exception of the ownership of up to 1% of the securities of any publicly-traded company involved in those activities.

      The form of restricted stock and stock option agreements used for restricted stock and stock option grants, including those outstanding grants to Messrs. Considine, Robertson, McAuliffe, Alcock and Graber, includes a provision for accelerated vesting upon a change in control.

      Effective in January 2002, the Company entered into certain non-competition and non-solicitation agreements with a number of employees, including Messrs. Considine, Robertson, McAuliffe, Alcock and Graber. Pursuant to the agreements, in consideration for payment of certain bonus and restricted stock, each of these executives agreed that during the term of his employment with the Company and for a period of two (2) years following the termination of his employment, except in circumstances where there was a change in control of the Company, he could not (i) be employed by a competitor of the Company named on a schedule to the agreement, (ii) solicit other employees to leave the Company’s employ or (iii) solicit customers of Aimco to terminate their relationship with the Company. The agreements further required that the executives protect Aimco’s trade secrets and confidential information.

      The agreements provide that in order to enforce the above-noted non-competition condition following the executive’s termination of employment by the Company without cause, each of Messrs. Considine, Robertson, McAuliffe, Alcock and Graber will receive, for a period not to exceed the earlier of twenty-four (24) months following such termination or the date of acceptance of employment with a non-competitor, (i) severance pay in an amount, if any, to be determined by the Company in its sole discretion and (ii) a monthly payment equal to two-thirds (2/3) of such executive’s monthly base salary at the time of termination.

      For purposes of these agreements, “cause” is defined to mean, among other things, the executive’s (i) breach of the agreement, (ii) failure to perform required employment services, (iii) misappropriation of Company funds or property, (iv) indictment, conviction, plea of guilty or plea of no contest to a crime involving fraud or moral turpitude, or (v) negligence, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, misconduct or violation of law.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

      From time to time, Aimco has entered into various transactions with certain of its executive officers and directors. Aimco attempts to price such transactions based on fair market value, and believes that the transactions are on terms that are as favorable to the Company as could be achieved with unrelated third parties.

High Performance Units

      In 2005, the Operating Partnership sold to a limited liability company owned by members of senior management and other employees of the Company’s subsidiaries (approximately 89% by a Considine family partnership and approximately 11% by other employees, including Messrs. Alcock and Robertson) an aggregate of 5,000 Class VIII Units for approximately $780,000. The sale was approved by Aimco’s stockholders at the 2005 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting. Based on the total return of Aimco’s Common Stock during 2005, compared to the peer index, and a minimum 11% return, the Class VIII Units were valued at $0 for the period of January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2005, however, the full measurement period ends on December 31, 2007.

      Based on the total return of Aimco’s Common Stock during 2003, 2004 and 2005, compared to the peer index, and a 36.8% minimum return, the Class VI Units were valued at $0 as of January 1, 2006, and the

allocable investment made by the investors of $985,000 was lost. Based on the total return of Aimco’s Common Stock during 2004 and 2005, compared to the peer index, and a minimum 23.2% return, the Class VII Units were valued at $0 for the period of January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2005, however, the full measurement period ends on December 31, 2006. Aimco is currently proposing for the Operating Partnership to issue up to 5,000 Class IX Units to a limited liability company that the Company expects will be owned by members of senior management (including up to 90% by a Considine family partnership) and other officers and employees. The aggregate purchase price for the Class IX Units is $875,000. See “Proposal 3: Approval of the Sale of High Performance Units.”

Stock Purchase Loans

      From time to time, prior to the effectiveness of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in July 2002, Aimco made loans to its executive officers to finance their purchase of shares of Common Stock from the Company. In order to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Aimco no longer provides loans to executive officers and will not make any material modification to any existing loans to executive officers. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to stock purchase loans to executive officers. For those officers who have no such loans, no information is shown.

Relocation Arrangements

      In connection with the relocation arrangement entered into with Mr. Robertson in March 2004, during 2005 Aimco reimbursed Mr. Robertson approximately $166,000 for capital gain taxes incurred by Mr. Robertson and his wife as a result of the sale of their California residence.

Property and Investment Analysis Arrangement

      In connection with the analysis and review of certain potential property investments, Aimco entered into a contract with ACP Advisors LLC. During 2005, Aimco paid ACP Advisors LLC fees in an aggregate amount of $222,515 plus reimbursement of direct expenses. Roger Cortez and Miles Cortez III are the sole members of ACP Advisors. Roger Cortez is the brother and Miles Cortez III is the son of Mr. Cortez, Aimco’s Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Cortez does not have an interest in ACP Advisors LLC.

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

      The following graph compares cumulative total returns for the Company’s Common Stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Total Return Index (the “S&P 500”), the NASDAQ Composite, the SNL Residential REIT Index and the MSCI US REIT Index. The SNL Residential REIT Index was prepared by SNL Securities, an independent research and publishing firm specializing in the collection and dissemination of data on the banking, thrift and financial services industries. The MSCI US REIT Index is published by Morgan Stanley Capital International Inc., a provider of equity indices. The indices are weighted for all companies that fit the definitional criteria of the particular index and are calculated to exclude companies as they are acquired and add them to the index calculation as they become publicly traded companies. All companies of the definitional criteria in existence at the point in time presented are included in the index calculations. The graph assumes the investment of $100 in the Company’s Common Stock and in each index on December 31, 2000, and that all dividends paid have been reinvested.

      The Performance Graph will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates the same by reference.

OTHER MATTERS

      Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance. Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires Aimco’s executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of Aimco’s equity securities, to file reports (Forms 3, 4 and 5) of stock ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. Executive officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of Aimco’s registered equity securities are required by SEC regulations to furnish Aimco with copies of all such forms that they file.

      Based solely on Aimco’s review of the copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and the amendments thereto received by it for the year ended December 31, 2005, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required to be filed by those persons, Aimco believes that during the period ended December 31, 2005, all filing requirements were complied with by its executive officers and directors of the Company’s stock, except that due to an administrative error, a Form 4 for Ms. Fielding was filed on September 13, 2005, for an exempt award of 8,554 shares made July 1, 2005. Aimco is not aware of any beneficial owner of more than ten percent of any class of any of Aimco’s registered equity securities.

      Stockholders’ Proposals. Proposals of stockholders intended to be presented at Aimco’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2007, must be received by Aimco, marked to the attention of the Secretary, no later than December 6, 2006, to be included in Aimco’s Proxy Statement and form of proxy for that meeting. Proposals must comply with the requirements as to form and substance established by the SEC for proposals in order to be included in the proxy statement. Proposals of stockholders submitted to Aimco for consideration at Aimco’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2007 outside the processes of Rule 14a-8 (i.e., the procedures for placing a stockholder’s proposal in Aimco’s proxy materials) will be considered untimely if received by the Company after February 19, 2007.

      Other Business. Aimco knows of no other business that will come before the Meeting for action. As to any other business that comes before the Meeting, the persons designated as proxies will have discretionary authority to act in their best judgment.

      Available Information. Aimco files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information that the Company files at the SEC’s public reference rooms in Washington, D.C., New York, New York and Chicago, Illinois. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. The Company’s public filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and on the internet site maintained by the SEC at “http://www.sec.gov.” Reports, proxy statements and other information concerning the Company also may be inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.

      The SEC allows Aimco to “incorporate by reference” information into this Proxy Statement, which means that the Company can disclose important information to you by referring you to another document filed separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is deemed to be part of this Proxy Statement, except for any information superseded by information contained directly in the Proxy Statement. This Proxy Statement incorporates by reference the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (Commission file No. 1-13232). This document contains important information about the Company and its financial condition.

      Aimco incorporates by reference additional documents that it may file with the SEC between the date of this Proxy Statement and the date of the Meeting. These include periodic reports, such as Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well as proxy statements. Aimco has mailed all information contained or incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement to stockholders.

      If you are a stockholder, the Company may have sent you some of the documents incorporated by reference, but you can obtain any of them through the Company or the SEC or the SEC’s internet site described above. Documents incorporated by reference are available from the Company without charge, excluding all exhibits unless specifically incorporated by reference as exhibits in the Proxy Statement.

Stockholders may obtain documents incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement by requesting them in writing from the Company at the following address:

      If you would like to request documents from the Company, please do so by April 20, 2006, to receive them before the Meeting. If you request any incorporated documents, they will be mailed to you by first-class mail, or other equally prompt means, within one business day of receipt of your request.

      You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Company has not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from what is contained in this Proxy Statement. This Proxy Statement is dated March      , 2006. You should not assume that the information contained in the Proxy Statement is accurate as of any date other than that date.

March      , 2006

Denver, Colorado

o FOR ALL NOMINEES		o WITHHOLD AUTHORITY for all Nominees		o WITHHOLD AUTHORITY for any Individual Nominee(s) (Write the name(s) of the nominee(s) in the space below)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

 

	Dated:                , 2006
	(Signature of Stockholder)
	(Signature of Stockholder)
	Please sign your name exactly as it appears hereon. If acting as attorney, executor, trustee, or in other representative capacity, please sign name and title. If stock is held jointly, each joint owner should sign.