Applica Incorporated
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 |
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR
THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _______ TO ________ |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-10177
APPLICA INCORPORATED
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
59-1028301 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
3633 Flamingo Road, Miramar, Florida
|
|
33027 |
|
|
|
(Address Of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(954) 883-1000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Former Name, If Changed Since Last Report:
Not Applicable
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer x
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares |
Class |
|
outstanding on August 1, 2006 |
Common Stock, $0.10 par value |
|
|
24,492,069 |
|
APPLICA INCORPORATED
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
2005 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
6,721 |
|
|
$ |
4,464 |
|
Accounts and other receivables, less
allowances of $7,004 in 2006 and $8,773
in 2005 |
|
|
87,203 |
|
|
|
140,479 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
99,947 |
|
|
|
101,638 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
10,392 |
|
|
|
11,137 |
|
Refundable income taxes |
|
|
3,645 |
|
|
|
3,661 |
|
Future income tax benefits |
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
209,177 |
|
|
|
262,628 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment - at cost,
less accumulated depreciation of $49,652
in 2006 and $46,755 in 2005 |
|
|
17,722 |
|
|
|
19,715 |
|
Future Income Tax Benefits, Non-Current |
|
|
9,035 |
|
|
|
9,185 |
|
Intangibles, Net |
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
3,184 |
|
|
|
3,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
240,492 |
|
|
$ |
297,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
38,196 |
|
|
$ |
33,682 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
36,862 |
|
|
|
50,034 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
41,665 |
|
|
|
69,524 |
|
Current taxes payable |
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
3,747 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
121,270 |
|
|
|
157,906 |
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
75,750 |
|
|
|
75,750 |
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock authorized: 75,000 shares of
$0.10 par value; issued and outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,487 shares in 2006 and 24,179 in 2005 |
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
160,064 |
|
|
|
159,226 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(114,683 |
) |
|
|
(95,749 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(4,741 |
) |
|
|
(2,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
43,089 |
|
|
|
63,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
240,492 |
|
|
$ |
297,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
104,491 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
116,458 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
73,496 |
|
|
|
70.3 |
|
|
|
89,256 |
|
|
|
76.6 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,496 |
|
|
|
70.3 |
|
|
|
93,499 |
|
|
|
80.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
30,995 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
22,959 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
33,648 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
38,310 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(2,653 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(15,351 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,681 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(5,121 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(17,477 |
) |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
Income tax provision |
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(5,975 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
|
$ |
(18,501 |
) |
|
|
(15.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share
basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
208,500 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
228,907 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
152,880 |
|
|
|
73.3 |
|
|
|
182,077 |
|
|
|
79.5 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,143 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,880 |
|
|
|
73.3 |
|
|
|
187,220 |
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
55,620 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
41,687 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
67,828 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
77,553 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(12,208 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(35,866 |
) |
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
5,459 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
5,083 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(790 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,210 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4,293 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(17,418 |
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
(40,159 |
) |
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
Income tax provision |
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(18,934 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
)% |
|
$ |
(41,457 |
) |
|
|
(18.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share
basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
2,418 |
|
|
$ |
159,226 |
|
|
$ |
(95,749 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,744 |
) |
|
$ |
63,151 |
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,934 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,934 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,997 |
) |
|
|
(1,997 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,931 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
2,449 |
|
|
$ |
160,064 |
|
|
$ |
(114,683 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,741 |
) |
|
$ |
43,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.
6
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(18,934 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,457 |
) |
Reconciliation to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
|
5,739 |
|
(Gain) Loss on disposal of equipment and raw materials |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
1,155 |
|
Recovery of doubtful accounts |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(1,052 |
) |
Write-downs of inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,204 |
|
Amortization of intangible and other assets |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
2,028 |
|
Product recall |
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
(1,312 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and other receivables |
|
|
52,899 |
|
|
|
56,108 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
(7,901 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
3,564 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(10,711 |
) |
|
|
(13,535 |
) |
Current income taxes |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(2,998 |
) |
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(1,783 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
28,323 |
|
|
|
16,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(941 |
) |
|
|
(1,827 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of equipment and raw materials |
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Receivable from former officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net payments under lines of credit |
|
|
(27,859 |
) |
|
|
(15,042 |
) |
Payments of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Interest receivable from former officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(27,262 |
) |
|
|
(17,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
4,464 |
|
|
|
10,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
6,721 |
|
|
$ |
10,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash paid during the six-month period ended June 30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
5,678 |
|
|
$ |
4,873 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
1,786 |
|
|
$ |
4,825 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
7
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Interim Reporting
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Applica
Incorporated and its subsidiaries (Applica). All significant intercompany transactions and
balances have been eliminated. The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in conformity with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission and,
therefore, do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of
financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. However, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of
the financial statements have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the remaining
quarters in 2006 or the full year ending December 31, 2006 due to seasonal fluctuations in
Applicas business, changes in economic conditions and other factors. For further information,
please refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto contained in Applicas
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Inventories
Inventories are comprised of finished goods and stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is
determined by the first-in, first-out method.
Stock Based Compensation
At June 30, 2006, Applica had two active stock-based compensation plans, which are described
below. On January 1, 2006, Applica adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), Shared Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which requires the measurement and
recognition of compensation cost for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors
based on estimated fair values. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, Applica accounted for its
stock-based employee compensation related to stock options under the intrinsic value recognition
and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB 25) and the disclosure alternative prescribed by SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure. Accordingly, Applica presented pro forma information
for the periods prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R and no employee compensation cost was
recognized for the stock-based compensation plans other than the grant date intrinsic value, if
any, for the options granted prior to January 1, 2006. However, there was approximately $0.1
million in stock-based compensation expense included in the net loss in 2004 relating to the
extension of the exercise period of options in connection with the resignation of the former
Chairman of the Board.
Applica has elected to use the modified prospective transition method for adopting SFAS No.
123R, which requires the recognition of stock-based compensation cost on a prospective basis;
therefore, prior period financial statements have not been restated. Under this method, the
provisions of SFAS No. 123R are applied to all awards granted after the adoption date and to awards
not yet vested with unrecognized expense at the adoption date based on the estimated fair value at
grant date as determined under the original provisions of SFAS No. 123. The impact of forfeitures
that may occur prior to vesting is also estimated and considered in the amount recognized. In
addition, the realization of tax benefits in excess of amounts recognized for financial reporting
purposes will be recognized as a financing activity rather than an operating activity as in the
past. Pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 123R, Applica will continue to present the pro forma
information for periods prior to the adoption date.
In June 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the acceleration
of vesting of all unvested out-of-the-money stock options awarded to employees under Applicas
stock option plans, except for those options held by executive officers. All stock options with
exercise prices equal to or greater than $3.28 per share, the closing price of Applicas common
stock on June 16, 2005, were considered to be out-of-the-money. No stock options held by
non-employees, including directors, were subject to acceleration. Options to purchase
8
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
approximately 425,000 shares of common stock were subject to the acceleration. These options
had a range of exercise prices of $3.63 to $11.16 and a weighted average exercise price of $4.91.
The aggregate pre-tax expense associated with the accelerated options that would have been
reflected in Applicas consolidated statement of operations in future fiscal years was
approximately $1.2 million. This amount is reflected in the pro forma footnote disclosure below.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In September 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors elected to terminate
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan effective December 31, 2005. Therefore, no additional shares will
be issued under such plan.
Stock Compensation Plans
Under various plans, Applica may grant incentive or non-qualified stock options to employees
and directors. The terms of stock options granted under the plans are determined by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors at the time of grant, including the exercise
price, term and any restrictions on the exercisability of such option. The exercise price of all
options granted under the plans equals the market price at the date of grant and no option is
exercisable after the expiration of ten years from the date of grant. The stock options
outstanding under the plans were generally granted for terms of five, six or ten years and vest on
a straight line basis over periods ranging from one to six years. No employee compensation
expense was recognized upon either the grant or exercise of these stock options during the periods
presented.
As of June 30, 2006, there were 161,227 shares available for grant under the 1998 Stock Option
Plan and 659,866 shares available for grant under the 2000 Stock Option Plan.
Information with respect to stock option activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Shares(000) |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
$ |
4.45 |
|
Granted |
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
4.10 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
$ |
1.94 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
$ |
6.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
$ |
4.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
$ |
4.47 |
|
For the three month period ended June 30, 2006, Applica recognized $0.1 million in stock-based
compensation costs, which is reflected in operating expenses. For the six month period ended June
30, 2006, Applica recognized $0.3 million in stock-based compensation costs. No tax benefits were
attributed to the stock-based compensation expense because a valuation allowance was maintained for
substantially all net deferred tax assets. Applica elected to adopt the alternative method of
calculating the historical pool of windfall tax benefits as permitted by FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. SFAS 123R-c, Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based
Payment Awards. This is a simplified method to determine the pool of windfall tax benefits that is
used in determining the tax effects of stock compensation in the results of operations and cash
flow reporting for awards that were outstanding as of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. As of June 30,
2006, Applica had $0.8 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock
option awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of two years.
Proceeds received from option exercises were $0.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006
and were $0.01 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005. No tax benefits were realized
from these stock option exercises.
The following information applies to options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2006:
9
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Shares(000) |
|
Contractual Life |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Shares(000) |
|
Exercise Price |
$1.62 - $3.17 |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
$3.17 - $6.34 |
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.42 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
$6.34 - $9.51 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
7.62 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
$ |
7.62 |
|
$9.51 - $12.68 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.19 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
$ |
10.16 |
|
$12.68 - $15.84 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
$31.69 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
31.69 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
31.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.40 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
$ |
4.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applica uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock
options on the date of grant. This model derives the fair value of stock options based on certain
assumptions related to expected stock price volatility, expected option life, risk-free interest
rate and dividend yield. Applicas expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of
Applicas stock price over the most recent period commensurate with the expected term of the stock
option award. The estimated expected option life is based primarily on historical employee exercise
patterns and considers whether and the extent to which the options are in-the-money. The risk-free
interest rate assumption is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve appropriate for the term of
Applicas stock options awards and the selected dividend yield assumption was determined in view of
Applicas historical and estimated dividend payout. Applica has no reason to believe that the
expected volatility of its stock price or its option exercise patterns will differ significantly
from historical volatility or option exercises.
For the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the fair value of each
option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
00.0 |
% |
|
|
00.0 |
% |
|
|
00.0 |
% |
|
|
00.0% |
|
Expected price volatility |
|
|
80.7 |
% |
|
|
80.9 |
% |
|
|
80.7 |
% |
|
|
24.2% - 80.9 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
3.25% |
|
Expected life of options in years |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and basic and diluted loss per share if
Applica had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to options granted under
Applicas stock option plans for the three month and six month period ended June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three |
|
|
For the six |
|
|
|
months ended |
|
|
months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Net loss, as reported |
|
$ |
(18,501 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,457 |
) |
Add: Stock-based employee compensation
expense included in net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under
fair value based method |
|
|
(1,524 |
) |
|
|
(1,996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(20,025 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted as reported |
|
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.72 |
) |
Basic and diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.83 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.80 |
) |
10
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
Comprehensive Loss
The components of comprehensive loss, net of tax, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(5,975 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,501 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,934 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,457 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(1,710 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(1,997 |
) |
|
|
(383 |
) |
Change in market value of derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(7,685 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,268 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,931 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncement
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation
Number 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109. The interpretation contains a two step approach to recognizing and measuring
uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to
evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence
indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the
tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate
settlement. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.
Applica has not yet analyzed the impact this interpretation will have on its financial condition,
results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
2. SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
The following table shows weighted average basic shares for the respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
Weighted average basic shares |
|
|
24,371,381 |
|
|
|
24,139,188 |
|
|
|
24,278,904 |
|
|
|
24,137,874 |
|
The following table shows potential common stock equivalents outstanding to purchase
shares of common stock that were excluded in the computation of diluted loss per share. All common
stock equivalents have been excluded from the diluted per share calculations in the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 because their inclusion would have been
anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
Number of shares |
|
|
1,708,454 |
|
|
|
2,593,596 |
|
|
|
1,706,733 |
|
|
|
2,588,204 |
|
Range of exercise price |
|
$ |
1.62-$31.69 |
|
|
$ |
3.63-$31.69 |
|
|
$ |
1.62-$31.69 |
|
|
$ |
3.63-$31.69 |
|
3. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Planned Rescission Offer
Applica recently discovered that the number of shares of its common stock purchased by
participants under the Applica Incorporated 401(k) Profit Sharing and Trust may have exceeded the
number of shares registered under the registration statement covering the plan. Plan participants
who purchased unregistered shares during the last twelve months could require Applica to repurchase
those shares for an amount equal to the price they paid, plus interest, or, if they sold the shares
at a loss, they may recover the amount of such loss, plus interest. Based on the latest data
provided to Applica, Applica estimates that approximately 105,000 shares were issued to plan
participants under the 401(k) plan during the twelve months ended
August 1, 2006. This estimate may be
modified as Applica continues to evaluate data provided by the plan administrator. During that
time, the price of Applicas common stock ranged from a low of $1.24 per share to a high of $4.95
per share. The closing price of the common stock on August 1, 2006 was $3.70 per share.
On
August 4, 2006 Applica filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register future
sales of Applica common stock to plan participants. Additionally, Applica plans to make a
registered rescission offer in the near future to eligible plan participants whereby it would offer
to repurchase any shares issued to them during the twelve months prior to the filing of the
registered rescission offer at the price the participant paid for such shares. Applica
11
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
also plans to offer to reimburse those participants who have sold shares for a loss during
those twelve months for the amount of the loss realized upon such sale. Applica will not effect the
repurchase of shares if the amount the participant paid for such shares, plus interest, is less
than the market value of the shares on the effective date of the rescission offer.
Applica did not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares pursuant to the 401(k) plan
as these purchases were made by a third party administrator on the open market. Applica does not
believe that the rescission offer will have a material impact on its consolidated financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Litigation and Other Matters
Shareholder Litigation. Applica is a defendant in the consolidated class action complaint
entitled Scott Schultz and Joseph Rothman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiffs v. Applica Incorporated, Harry D. Schulman, Terry L. Polistina and Michael
Michienzi, Defendants, Case No. 06-60149-CIV-DIMITROULEAS, which was first filed in the United
States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on February 3, 2006 and amended on July 10,
2006.
The consolidated purported class action complaint was filed on behalf of purchasers of Applica
Incorporated common stock during the period between November 4, 2004 and April 28, 2005. The
complaint charges Applica and certain executive officers with violations of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. The complaint alleges that, throughout the class period, Applica issued materially
false and misleading statements regarding its business, operations, management and the intrinsic
value of its common stock. The complaint further alleges that these statements were materially
false and misleading on the asserted basis that they failed to disclose that Applica:
|
|
|
was experiencing decreasing demand for its products; in particular, demand for two key
products were not meeting internal expectations and were experiencing quality and design
defects; |
|
|
|
|
was materially overstating its net worth by failing to timely write down the value of
its inventory which had become obsolete and unsaleable; |
|
|
|
|
was experiencing higher product warranty returns, which it had not appropriately reserved for; |
|
|
|
|
lacked adequate internal controls; and |
|
|
|
|
issued financial statements during the class period were not prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and, therefore, were materially false and
misleading. |
The plaintiffs seek, among other relief, to be declared a class, to be awarded compensatory
damages, rescission rights, unspecified damages and attorneys fees and costs. Applica believes
the claims are without merit. Applica intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit but may be unable
to successfully resolve the disputes without incurring significant expenses. Due to the early
stage of these proceedings, any potential loss cannot presently be determined with respect to this
litigation matter. However, Applica believes any losses will be covered by applicable insurance
coverage.
In February 2006, the SEC requested that Applica voluntarily produce certain documents in
connection with an informal inquiry related to these matters. Applica has responded to the request
for documents and other information and intends to fully cooperate with the SEC in this matter.
Other Matters. Applica is subject to legal proceedings, product liability claims and other
claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of management, the amount
of ultimate liability with respect to such matters, if any, in excess of applicable insurance
coverage, is not likely to have a material effect on Applicas business, financial condition,
results of operations or liquidity. However, as the outcome of litigation or other claims is
difficult to predict, significant changes in the estimated exposures could occur.
As a distributor of consumer products, Applica is also subject to the Consumer Products Safety
Act, which empowers the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) to exclude from the market
products that are found to be unsafe or hazardous. Applica receives inquiries from the CPSC in the
ordinary course of its business.
12
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
In April 2006, Applica entered into an executive change-in-control plan and amendments to
employment agreements with certain of its senior officers, as well as change-in-control agreements
with certain of its employees.
4. COST OF SALES
Cost of Goods Sold
Included in cost of goods sold for the six months ended June 30, 2005 were inventory
write-downs of approximately $12.8 million primarily related to lower-than-anticipated consumer
demand for two products. Included in cost of goods sold for the three months ended June 30, 2005
were inventory write-downs of approximately $3.4 million primarily related to an adjustment to the
net realizable value of these products. There were no inventory write-downs related to these two
products in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006.
The inventory write-downs related to the Household Products reportable segment.
Restructuring Charges
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, there were $4.2 million of restructuring charges
associated primarily with the downsizing and decision in July 2005 to close Applicas manufacturing
facility in Mexico. Such charges consisted of the write-off of $3.3 million of raw materials
inventory that would no longer be used in production, $0.6 million of accelerated depreciation of
machinery and equipment used in the manufacturing process and $0.3 million in severance charges.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, there were $5.1 million of restructuring charges associated
with the continued downsizing and closing of the manufacturing operations in Mexico. These charges
consisted of the write-off of $3.3 million of raw materials inventory that would no longer be used
in production, $1.2 million related to the acceleration of the depreciation of the machinery and
equipment used in the manufacturing process and $0.6 million in severance charges. There were no
such charges in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006.
All restructuring charges related to the Manufacturing reportable segment. The Manufacturing
segment ceased operations in October 2005.
Product Recall
In June 2006, Applicas U.S. operating subsidiary, Applica Consumer Products, Inc., in
cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission, announced a voluntary recall of
approximately 410,000 units of the Black & Decker® branded TCM 800 and TCM 805 thermal
coffeemakers. Applicas Canadian operating subsidiary, Applica Canada Corporation, also recalled
approximately 40,000 units of these thermal coffeemakers in Canada. Applica recorded a charge to
cost of goods sold of approximately $3.7 million in the first quarter of 2006 related to the
recall. Management does not believe the ultimate liability will be materially different.
As of August 1, 2006, no litigation had been filed in connection with property damage or
bodily injury relating to the recalled product discussed above; however, several claims for minor
property damages have been made. Applica believes that the amount of ultimate liability of these
claims in excess of applicable insurance, if any, is not likely to have a material effect on its
business, financial condition or results of operations. However, as the outcome of litigation is
difficult to predict, significant changes in the estimated exposures could occur.
The estimated charges associated with the product recall related to the Household Products
reportable segment.
5. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
In February 2006, Applica entered into a sale and purchase agreement with an unrelated third
party to sell the land and building housing its factory in Mexico. Management expected the sale to
close in the second quarter of 2006. The sale did not close and the property was re-listed for sale
in July 2006. The land and building were classified as assets held for sale and included in
prepaid expenses and other in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets at its net realizable
value.
13
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
In connection with the closure of the Mexico manufacturing facility, certain machinery and
equipment and furniture and fixtures totaling approximately $0.4 million and certain raw materials
inventory totaling approximately $0.4 million were classified as assets held for sale at December
31, 2005, and included in prepaid expenses and other in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet. In March 2006, the machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures and raw materials were
sold. The sale resulted in a small gain.
All assets held for sale related to the Manufacturing reportable segment.
6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The following is a summary of property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Useful Lives |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Computer equipment |
|
3 - 7 years |
|
$ |
30,811 |
|
|
$ |
30,449 |
|
Equipment and other |
|
3 - 8 years |
|
|
32,967 |
|
|
|
32,452 |
|
Leasehold improvements* |
|
8 - 10 years |
|
|
3,596 |
|
|
|
3,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,374 |
|
|
|
66,470 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,652 |
|
|
|
46,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,722 |
|
|
$ |
19,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Shorter of remaining term of lease or useful life |
In March 2005, Applica completed the implementation of a significant upgrade of its
information technology infrastructure, including the installation of a new enterprise resource
planning (ERP) system. As a result, during the second quarter of 2005, approximately $12.1 million
of capitalized expenditures associated with the information technology upgrade, which were
previously not subject to depreciation, were placed into service and began to be depreciated over
their respective useful lives.
7. PRODUCT WARRANTY OBLIGATIONS
Estimated future warranty obligations related to certain products are charged to operations in
the period in which the related revenue is recognized. Accrued product warranties as of June 30,
2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
7,747 |
|
|
$ |
7,183 |
|
Additions to accrued product warranties |
|
|
10,285 |
|
|
|
15,733 |
|
Reductions of accruals payments and credits issued |
|
|
(14,130 |
) |
|
|
(18,582 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
3,902 |
|
|
$ |
4,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. SHORT-TERM DEBT
Applica has a senior revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks that provides for
borrowings on a revolving basis of up to $125 million with a $10 million sublimit for letters of
credit. The credit facility matures in November 2009.
Advances under the credit facility are governed by Applicas collateral value, which is based
upon percentages of eligible accounts receivable and inventories. Under the credit facility, if
Applica does not maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0, Applica must
maintain a minimum daily availability under its borrowing base of $10 million and a minimum average
monthly availability of $13 million. If Applica maintains a fixed charge coverage ratio of greater
than 1.0 to 1.0, there is no availability requirement and no availability block. As of June 30,
2006, Applicas fixed charge coverage ratio was less than 1.0 to 1.0.
14
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
As of June 30, 2006, Applica was borrowing approximately $41.7 million under the facility and
had approximately $38.9 million available for future cash borrowings; provided however, during the
time in which Applicas fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.0 to 1.0, it is subject to a $10
million daily block.
At Applicas option, interest accrues on the loans made under the credit facility at either:
|
|
|
|
LIBOR (adjusted for any reserves), plus a specified margin (determined by Applicas
average quarterly availability and set at 1.75% at June 30, 2006), which was 7.08% at June
30, 2006; or |
|
|
|
|
the Base Rate (which is Bank of Americas prime rate), plus a specified margin
(determined based upon Applicas average quarterly availability and was zero at June 30,
2006), which was 8.25% at June 30, 2006. |
Swing loans up to $15.0 million bear interest at the Base Rate plus a specified margin
(determined based upon Applicas average quarterly availability and was zero at June 30, 2006),
which was 8.25% at June 30, 2006.
The credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of the real and personal property,
tangible and intangible, of Applica Incorporated and its domestic subsidiaries, as well as:
|
|
|
a pledge of all of the stock of Applicas domestic subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
a pledge of not more than 65% of the voting stock of each direct foreign subsidiary of
Applica Incorporated and each direct foreign subsidiary of each domestic subsidiary of
Applica Incorporated; and |
|
|
|
|
a pledge of all of the capital stock of any subsidiary of a subsidiary of Applica
Incorporated that is a borrower under the credit facility. |
The credit facility is guaranteed by all of the current, and will be guaranteed by any future,
domestic subsidiaries of Applica Incorporated.
The credit facility contains a number of significant covenants that, among other things,
restrict the ability of Applica to dispose of assets, incur additional indebtedness, prepay other
indebtedness, pay dividends, repurchase or redeem capital stock, enter into certain investments or
create new subsidiaries, enter into sale and lease-back transactions, make certain acquisitions,
engage in mergers or consolidations, create liens, or engage in certain transactions with
affiliates, and that otherwise restrict corporate and business activities. At June 30, 2006,
Applica was in compliance with all covenants under the credit facility.
As of June 30, 2006, Applica had letters of credit of $1.2 million outstanding under its
credit facility.
Although the credit facility expires in November 2009, Applica has classified the borrowings
thereunder as a current liability in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 95-22
Balance Sheet Classifications of Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements That
Include Both a Subjective Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box Arrangement.
9. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
At June 30, 2006, Applica managed its operations through two business segments: Household
Products and Professional Personal Care Products. Through October 2005, Applica managed its
operations through three business segments: Household Products, Professional Personal Care Products
and Manufacturing. The Manufacturing segment ceased operations in October 2005.
The segment information for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
15
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Household |
|
|
Personal Care |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
95,308 |
|
|
$ |
9,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
104,491 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
(824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,551 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
106,913 |
|
|
$ |
8,946 |
|
|
$ |
10,763 |
|
|
$ |
126,622 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,416 |
|
|
|
10,164 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(7,446 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(6,454 |
) |
|
|
(14,187 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
190,481 |
|
|
$ |
18,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
208,500 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(6,370 |
) |
|
|
(3,520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,890 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
205,727 |
|
|
$ |
23,615 |
|
|
$ |
28,889 |
|
|
$ |
258,231 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,542 |
|
|
|
29,324 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(24,822 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(8,552 |
) |
|
|
(33,550 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
4,097 |
|
The following table sets forth the reconciliation to consolidated total assets as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets from reportable segments |
|
$ |
216,236 |
|
|
$ |
275,584 |
|
All other |
|
|
24,256 |
|
|
|
21,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
$ |
240,492 |
|
|
$ |
297,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the reconciliation to consolidated amounts for net sales,
operating loss and depreciation and amortization for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales for reportable segments |
|
$ |
104,491 |
|
|
$ |
126,622 |
|
|
$ |
208,500 |
|
|
$ |
258,231 |
|
Eliminations of intersegment sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales |
|
$ |
104,491 |
|
|
$ |
116,458 |
|
|
$ |
208,500 |
|
|
$ |
228,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating loss from reportable segments |
|
$ |
(1,551 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,187 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,890 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,550 |
) |
Unallocated amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shared services and all other |
|
|
(1,102 |
) |
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
|
|
(2,318 |
) |
|
|
(2,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating loss |
|
$ |
(2,653 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,351 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,208 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization from
reportable segments |
|
$ |
809 |
|
|
$ |
2,286 |
|
|
$ |
1,615 |
|
|
$ |
4,097 |
|
Shared services and all other |
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
3,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
1,872 |
|
|
$ |
4,261 |
|
|
$ |
3,789 |
|
|
$ |
7,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Applicas domestic subsidiaries are guarantors of Applicas 10% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2008. The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial position,
results of operations and liquidity of Applica Incorporated (on a stand alone basis), the guarantor
subsidiaries (on a combined basis), the non-guarantor subsidiaries (on a combined basis) and the
eliminations necessary to arrive at the consolidated results of Applica. The results of operations
and cash flows presented below assume that the guarantor subsidiaries were in place for all periods
presented. Applica and guarantor subsidiaries have accounted for investments in their respective
subsidiaries on an unconsolidated basis using the equity method of accounting. The guarantor
subsidiaries are wholly owned subsidiaries of Applica and have fully and unconditionally guaranteed
the notes on a joint and several basis. The notes contain certain covenants which, among other
things, restrict the ability of the guarantor subsidiaries to make distributions to Applica
Incorporated. Applica has not presented separate financial statements and other disclosures
concerning the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries because it has determined they
would not be material to investors.
17
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
845 |
|
|
$ |
5,876 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,721 |
|
Accounts and other receivables, net |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
57,955 |
|
|
|
29,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,203 |
|
Receivables from affiliates |
|
|
(64,874 |
) |
|
|
93,845 |
|
|
|
(14,994 |
) |
|
|
(13,977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,716 |
|
|
|
23,860 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
99,947 |
|
Future income tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
1,269 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,665 |
|
|
|
10,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
(64,888 |
) |
|
|
232,169 |
|
|
|
54,297 |
|
|
|
(12,401 |
) |
|
|
209,177 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
232,926 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
29,232 |
|
|
|
(262,942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,519 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,722 |
|
Future income tax benefits, non current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
(1,597 |
) |
|
|
9,035 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,817 |
|
|
|
23,458 |
|
|
|
(38,717 |
) |
|
|
4,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
168,038 |
|
|
$ |
274,468 |
|
|
$ |
113,643 |
|
|
|
($315,657 |
) |
|
$ |
240,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
55,029 |
|
|
$ |
19,744 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
75,058 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
41,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,665 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
884 |
|
Current taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
2,954 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
41,950 |
|
|
|
56,240 |
|
|
|
22,866 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
121,270 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
75,750 |
|
|
|
62,760 |
|
|
|
12,919 |
|
|
|
(75,679 |
) |
|
|
75,750 |
|
Future income tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
117,700 |
|
|
|
119,383 |
|
|
|
35,802 |
|
|
|
(75,482 |
) |
|
|
197,403 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
50,338 |
|
|
|
155,085 |
|
|
|
77,841 |
|
|
|
(240,175 |
) |
|
|
43,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
168,038 |
|
|
$ |
274,468 |
|
|
$ |
113,643 |
|
|
|
($315,657 |
) |
|
$ |
240,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
Statement of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
75,923 |
|
|
$ |
25,457 |
|
|
$ |
3,111 |
|
|
$ |
104,491 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,980 |
|
|
|
17,405 |
|
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
73,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,943 |
|
|
|
8,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,995 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
25,418 |
|
|
|
7,753 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
33,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) profit |
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
(2,475 |
) |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(2,653 |
) |
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings before equity in net
earnings of subsidiaries and income taxes |
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
(5,233 |
) |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(5,121 |
) |
Equity in
net loss of subsidiaries |
|
|
(5,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(5,759 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,308 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
5,108 |
|
|
$ |
(5,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
Statement
of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
152,899 |
|
|
$ |
55,601 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
208,500 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,218 |
|
|
|
41,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,681 |
|
|
|
13,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,620 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
52,888 |
|
|
|
14,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
(11,207 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,208 |
) |
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,534 |
|
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
5,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before equity in net earnings of
subsidiaries and income taxes |
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
(16,741 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(17,418 |
) |
Equity in net loss of subsidiaries |
|
|
(18,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($18,737 |
) |
|
|
($16,893 |
) |
|
|
($1,273 |
) |
|
$ |
17,969 |
|
|
|
($18,934 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash
Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
$ |
(13,262 |
) |
|
$ |
24,905 |
|
|
$ |
3,321 |
|
|
$ |
13,359 |
|
|
$ |
28,323 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
59,608 |
|
|
|
(48,348 |
) |
|
|
(1,113 |
) |
|
|
(9,634 |
) |
|
|
513 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
(47,029 |
) |
|
|
23,660 |
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(3,725 |
) |
|
|
(27,262 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
683 |
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,464 |
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
845 |
|
|
$ |
5,876 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,721 |
|
19
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
628 |
|
|
$ |
3,836 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,464 |
|
Accounts and other receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,841 |
|
|
|
38,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,479 |
|
Receivables from affiliates |
|
|
(43,473 |
) |
|
|
79,638 |
|
|
|
(10,418 |
) |
|
|
(25,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,508 |
|
|
|
23,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,638 |
|
Future income tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,321 |
|
|
|
11,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
(43,473 |
) |
|
|
265,293 |
|
|
|
66,555 |
|
|
|
(25,747 |
) |
|
|
262,628 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
251,898 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
29,232 |
|
|
|
(281,913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,420 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,715 |
|
Long-term future income tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,472 |
|
|
|
2,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,185 |
|
Intangibles and other assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,738 |
|
|
|
11,635 |
|
|
|
(25,619 |
) |
|
|
5,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
208,425 |
|
|
$ |
309,706 |
|
|
$ |
112,430 |
|
|
$ |
(333,279 |
) |
|
$ |
297,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
65,023 |
|
|
$ |
18,693 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
83,716 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
69,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,524 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
919 |
|
Current taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
69,524 |
|
|
|
66,272 |
|
|
|
22,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,906 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
75,750 |
|
|
|
69,100 |
|
|
|
12,281 |
|
|
|
(81,381 |
) |
|
|
75,750 |
|
Future income tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
(1,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
145,274 |
|
|
|
137,729 |
|
|
|
32,509 |
|
|
|
(81,381 |
) |
|
|
234,131 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
63,151 |
|
|
|
171,977 |
|
|
|
79,921 |
|
|
|
(251,898 |
) |
|
|
63,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
208,425 |
|
|
$ |
309,706 |
|
|
$ |
112,430 |
|
|
$ |
(333,279 |
) |
|
$ |
297,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
Statement
of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
83,043 |
|
|
$ |
43,579 |
|
|
$ |
(10,164 |
) |
|
$ |
116,458 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,593 |
|
|
|
41,070 |
|
|
|
(10,164 |
) |
|
|
93,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,450 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,959 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,445 |
|
|
|
5,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,995 |
) |
|
|
(3,356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,351 |
) |
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2,125 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings before equity in net
earnings of subsidiaries and income taxes |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(14,120 |
) |
|
|
(3,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,477 |
) |
Equity in net earnings (loss) of subsidiaries |
|
|
(18,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(18,500 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,166 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,320 |
) |
|
$ |
18,485 |
|
|
$ |
(18,501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
Statement
of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
173,109 |
|
|
$ |
85,122 |
|
|
$ |
(29,324 |
) |
|
$ |
228,907 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,619 |
|
|
|
80,925 |
|
|
|
(29,324 |
) |
|
|
187,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,490 |
|
|
|
4,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,687 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,861 |
|
|
|
12,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,371 |
) |
|
|
(8,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,866 |
) |
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
4,536 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before equity in net earnings of
subsidiaries and income taxes |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(31,907 |
) |
|
|
(8,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,159 |
) |
Equity in net loss of subsidiaries |
|
|
(41,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(41,457 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,689 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,740 |
) |
|
$ |
41,429 |
|
|
$ |
(41,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Applica Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Non-Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
Cash
Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
$ |
(38,779 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,264 |
) |
|
$ |
22,351 |
|
|
$ |
41,153 |
|
|
$ |
16,461 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
54,187 |
|
|
|
(35,913 |
) |
|
|
(21,777 |
) |
|
|
4,844 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
(16,006 |
) |
|
|
44,274 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(45,997 |
) |
|
|
(17,971 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598 |
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
8,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,463 |
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,260 |
|
|
$ |
8,632 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,892 |
|
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Proposed Merger
On July 23, 2006, Applica Incorporated, NACCO Industries, Inc. (NACCO), and HB-PS Holding
Company, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of NACCO (Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex), entered into
definitive agreements whereby NACCO will spin off its Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex business to
NACCOs stockholders and, immediately after the spin-off, Applica will merge with and into Hamilton
Beach/Proctor-Silex. The combined public company will be named Hamilton Beach, Inc.
Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), the outstanding shares
of Applica common stock will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of Hamilton
Beach, Inc. Class A common stock equal to 25 percent of the aggregate number of shares of Hamilton
Beach, Inc. common stock outstanding immediately following the merger. The terms of the Merger
Agreement include customary representations and warranties by each of the parties, as well as
certain restrictions and limitations on future transactions of Applica prior to the closing of the
merger, including acquisitions, dispositions, additional borrowings, issuance of equity and changes
in employee benefit plans.
The merger, which was approved by the Board of Directors of Applica, will be tax-free to
stockholders of Applica. The merger is subject to approval by Applicas shareholders and to other
customary closing conditions, including (a) receipt of regulatory approvals, (b) the absence of
legal impediments prohibiting the transactions, (c) the completion of the spin off of Hamilton
Beach/Proctor-Silex; (d) the effectiveness of the registration statement concerning the shares of
Hamilton Beach, Inc. Class A common stock to be issued to Applica shareholders in connection with
the merger, (e) approval of the listing of the Hamilton Beach, Inc. Class A common stock on the
NYSE or the NASDAQ, (f) the parties performance of their respective covenants, including the
repayment of certain of Applicas outstanding indebtedness, and (g) receipt of customary tax
opinions to the effect that the merger will constitute a tax-free reorganization under the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for Applica. If the Merger Agreement
is terminated as the result of a superior offer, Applica may be required to pay NACCO a termination
fee of $4.0 million, plus up to $2.0 million of reasonable documented, third party, out-of-pocket
expenses.
21
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we, our, us, the Company and Applica
refer to Applica Incorporated and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
The following discussion and analysis and the related financial data present a review of the
consolidated operating results and financial condition of Applica for the three-month and six month
periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction
with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
General
Applica is a marketer and distributor of a broad range of branded small household appliances.
We market and distribute kitchen products, home products, pest control products, pet care products
and personal care products. Applica markets products under licensed brand names, such as Black &
Decker®, and its own brand names, such as Windmere®, LitterMaid®, Belson® and Applica®. Our
customers include mass merchandisers, specialty retailers and appliance distributors primarily in
North America, Latin America and the Caribbean.
As of June 30, 2006, we managed our operations through two business segments: Household
Products and Professional Personal Care Products. Through October 2005, we managed our operations
through three business segments: Household Products, Professional Personal Care Products and
Manufacturing. The Manufacturing segment ceased operations in October 2005.
Proposed Merger
On July 23, 2006, Applica Incorporated, NACCO Industries, Inc. (NACCO), and HB-PS Holding
Company, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of NACCO (Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex), entered into
definitive agreements whereby NACCO will spin off its Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex business to
NACCOs stockholders and, immediately after the spin-off, Applica will merge with and into Hamilton
Beach/Proctor-Silex. The combined public company will be named Hamilton Beach, Inc.
Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), the outstanding shares
of Applica common stock will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of Hamilton
Beach, Inc. Class A common stock equal to 25 percent of the aggregate number of shares of Hamilton
Beach, Inc. common stock outstanding immediately following the merger. The terms of the Merger
Agreement include customary representations and warranties by each of the parties, as well as
certain restrictions and limitations on future transactions of Applica prior to the closing of the
merger, including acquisitions, dispositions, additional borrowings, issuance of equity and changes
in employee benefit plans.
The merger, which was approved by the Board of Directors of Applica, will be tax-free to
stockholders of Applica. The merger is subject to approval by Applicas shareholders and to other
customary closing conditions, including:
|
|
|
receipt of regulatory approvals; |
|
|
|
|
the absence of legal impediments prohibiting the transactions; |
|
|
|
|
the completion of the spin off of Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex; |
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of the registration statement concerning the shares of
Hamilton Beach, Inc. Class A common stock to be issued to Applica shareholders in
connection with the merger; |
|
|
|
|
approval of the listing of the Hamilton Beach, Inc. Class A common stock on the
NYSE or the NASDAQ; |
|
|
|
|
the parties performance of their respective covenants, including the repayment
of certain of Applicas outstanding indebtedness; and |
22
|
|
|
receipt of customary tax opinions to the effect that the merger will constitute
a tax-free reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. |
The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for Applica. If the Merger Agreement
is terminated as the result of a superior offer, Applica may be required to pay NACCO a termination
fee of $4.0 million, plus up to $2.0 million of reasonable documented, third party, out-of-pocket
expenses.
Planned Rescission Offer
We recently discovered that the number of shares of our common stock purchased by participants
under our 401(k) Profit Sharing and Trust may have exceeded the number of shares registered under
the registration statement covering the plan. Plan participants who purchased unregistered shares
during the last twelve months could require us to repurchase those shares for an amount equal to
the price they paid, plus interest, or, if they sold the shares at a loss, they may recover the
amount of such loss, plus interest. Based on the latest data provided to us, we estimate that
approximately 105,000 shares were issued to plan participants under the 401(k) plan during the
twelve months ended August 1, 2006. This estimate may be modified as we continue to evaluate data
provided by the plan administrator. During that time, the price of Applicas common stock ranged
from a low of $1.24 per share to a high of $4.95 per share. The closing price of the common stock
on August 1, 2006 was $3.70 per share.
On
August 4, 2006, we filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register future sales
of Applica common stock to plan participants. Additionally, we plan to make a registered
rescission offer in the near future to eligible plan participants whereby we would offer to
repurchase any shares issued to them during the twelve months prior to the filing of the registered
rescission offer at the price the participant paid for such shares. We also plan to offer to
reimburse those participants who have sold shares for a loss during those twelve months for the
amount of the loss realized upon such sale. We will not effect the repurchase of shares if the
amount the participant paid for such shares, plus interest, is less than the market value of the
shares on the effective date of the rescission offer.
Applica did not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares pursuant to the 401(k) plan
as these purchases were made by a third party administrator on the open market. We do not believe
that the rescission offer will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations,
financial position or liquidity. We have received waivers from both our senior lending group and
our term loan lender of potential violations of the applicable loan documents related to the
failure to register the shares offered under the 401(k) plan and the rescission offer.
Mexican Manufacturing Facility
In February 2006, we entered into a sale and purchase agreement with an unrelated third party
to sell the land and building housing our factory in Mexico. We expected the sale to close in the
second quarter of 2006; however, the sale did not close and the agreement was terminated. The
property was re-listed for sale in July 2006. The land and building were classified as an asset
held for sale and included in prepaid expenses and other in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets at its net realizable value.
Additionally, in connection with the closure of the manufacturing facility in Mexico, certain
machinery and equipment and furniture and fixtures totaling approximately $0.4 million and certain
raw materials inventory totaling approximately $0.4 million were classified as assets held for sale
and included in prepaid expenses and other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2005. In March 2006, the machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures and raw
materials were sold. The sale resulted in a small gain.
Elec-Tech International (H.K.) Company, Ltd.
We entered into a supply agreement with Elec-Tech International (H.K.) Company, Ltd in July
2004. Elec-Tech accounted for approximately 35% of our total purchases in 2005. The supply
agreement was terminated by us in December 2005 as the result of material breaches by Elec-Tech,
most of which were corrected after the termination date. Effective December 1, 2005, our accounts
payable terms with Elec-Tech changed from 60 days from invoice date to 30 days from invoice date.
We are still in negotiations of new business terms with Elec-Tech and expect to continue to
purchase a significant amount of products from such supplier. However, no formal agreement has been
reached. We believe that we may be able to reach agreement with Elec-Tech on acceptable
23
terms, but if we are unable to do so, product shipments could be interrupted or Elec-tech
could require shorter credit terms from us. We believe that the products currently made by
Elec-Tech are available from other suppliers on similar terms, although the transition of a
significant amount of production would involve risk.
Fluctuation of Chinese Currency
In July 2005, China ended its peg to the dollar and allowed the renminbi to fluctuate versus a
basket of currencies. Immediately, the new renminbi rate revalued the currency by 2.1% to 8.11 to
the dollar. At August 1, 2006 the renminbi rate was 7.97 to the dollar. Because a substantial
number of our products are imported from China, the floating currency could result in significant
fluctuations in our product costs and could have a material effect on our business.
Forward Looking Statement Disclosure
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Such statements are
indicated by words or phrases such as anticipates, projects, management believes, Applica
believes, intends, expects, and similar words or phrases. Such forward-looking statements are
subject to certain risks, uncertainties or assumptions and may be affected by certain other
factors, including the specific factors set forth below.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors, together with the other information
contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 in evaluating us
and our business before making an investment decision regarding our securities:
Merger-Related Risk Factors
|
|
|
We may not be able to obtain governmental approvals of the proposed spin-off and merger
on the proposed terms and schedule. |
|
|
|
|
We may not be able to obtain approval of the merger from our shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
The new company may not be able to integrate the two businesses successfully. |
|
|
|
|
The new company may not be able to fully realize the anticipated cost savings and
synergies from the proposed transaction within the proposed time frame. |
|
|
|
|
There may be significant disruption from the spin-off and merger making it more
difficult to maintain relationships with customers, employees or suppliers. |
|
|
|
|
Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex may not be able to obtain New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ approval for
the listing of the new companys common stock. |
|
|
|
|
Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex may not be able to effect a registration statement concerning the shares
of the new company to be distributed to Applica shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
Customers may not accept the new combined entity. |
Operational
and Other Risk Factors
|
|
|
We purchase a large number of products from one supplier. Production-related risks,
interruption of product shipments or demand for shorter credit terms from this supplier
could jeopardize our ability to realize anticipated sales and profits. |
|
|
|
|
We are dependent on key personnel and the loss of these key personnel could have a
material adverse effect on our success. |
24
|
|
|
The New York Stock Exchange has notified us that we are not in compliance with its
continued listing criteria. If we are delisted by the NYSE, the price and liquidity of our
common stock will be negatively affected. |
|
|
|
|
We may incur significant damages and expenses due to the purported class action
complaints that were filed against us and certain of our officers. |
|
|
|
|
The rescission offer related to our 401(k) plan may not bar claims relating to our
non-compliance with securities laws or any other applicable law, and we may potentially be
liable for further rescission or damages. |
|
|
|
|
We depend on third party suppliers for the manufacturing of all of our products which
subjects us to additional risks. |
|
|
|
|
Our business involves the potential for product recalls and product liability claims against us. |
|
|
|
|
The failure of our business strategy could have a material adverse effect on our business. |
|
|
|
|
Our business could be adversely affected by fluctuation of the Chinese currency. |
|
|
|
|
We depend on purchases from several large customers and any significant decline in these
purchases or pressure from these customers to reduce prices could have a negative effect on
our business. |
|
|
|
|
Increases in costs of products will reduce our profitability. |
|
|
|
|
Our business is very sensitive to the strength of the U.S. retail market and weakness in
this market could adversely affect our business. |
|
|
|
|
Our business could be adversely affected by currency fluctuations in our international operations. |
|
|
|
|
Our business can be adversely affected by newly acquired businesses or product lines. |
|
|
|
|
Our future success requires us to develop new and innovative products on a consistent
basis in order to increase revenues and we may not be able to do so. |
|
|
|
|
The bankruptcy or financial difficulty of any major customer or fluctuations in the
financial condition of the retail industry could adversely affect our business. |
|
|
|
|
Our business could be adversely affected by retailer inventory management. |
|
|
|
|
Our business could be adversely affected by changes in trade relations with China. |
|
|
|
|
If we are unable to renew the Black & Decker® trademark license agreement, our business
could be adversely affected. |
|
|
|
|
The infringement or loss of our proprietary rights could have an adverse effect on our business. |
|
|
|
|
Our operating results are affected by seasonality. |
|
|
|
|
We compete with other large companies that produce similar products. |
|
|
|
|
Our debt agreements contain covenants that restrict our ability to take certain actions. |
|
|
|
|
Government regulations could adversely impact our operations. |
Should one or more of these risks, uncertainties or other factors materialize, or should
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results, performance, or achievements may vary
materially from any future
25
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Applica or persons
acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements in this
paragraph. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Applica
undertakes no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances that arise after the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
26
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared To Three Months Ended June 30, 2005
Net Sales. Consolidated net sales decreased by $12.0 million to $104.5 million, a decrease of
10.3% from the second quarter of 2005.
Sales for the Household Product segment, net of inter-segment sales in 2005, decreased $10.9
million to $95.3 million. For the quarter ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
sales of Black & Decker® branded products decreased by $8.2 million to $83.5 million; |
|
|
|
|
sales of Littermaid® branded products increased by $2.0 million to $9.0 million; and |
|
|
|
|
sales of other branded products decreased by $4.7 million to $2.8 million. |
The decrease in Black & Decker® branded products was primarily attributable to our decision to
exit the home environment product category and other non-profitable SKUs as part of our product and
customer profitability review, softness in the retail environment and inventory management by
certain key customers.
The increase in sales of Littermaid® branded products for the second quarter of 2006 compared
to the same period in 2005 was attributable to increased orders resulting from supply shortages in
the first quarter of 2006 related to our transition to the next generation of automatic litter
boxes.
Sales for the Professional Personal Care segment increased slightly by $0.3 million to $9.2
million for the second quarter of 2006.
Sales for the Manufacturing segment were $10.8 million in the second quarter of 2005. During
the second quarter of 2005, intersegment sales for the Manufacturing segment were $9.4 million and
contract manufacturing sales were $1.4 million. Manufacturing operations ceased in October 2005.
Gross Profit. Our gross profit margin increased to 29.7% for the three months ended June 30,
2006 as compared to 19.7% for the same period in 2005. Gross profit in the second quarter of 2006
was positively impacted by improvements in product mix. However, gross profit was negatively
impacted by (a) the sale of previously produced inventory at our manufacturing facility in Mexico
that included approximately $0.9 million of capitalized losses and (b) the movement of certain
customers to freight collect programs.
Gross profits for the second quarter of 2005 were negatively impacted by:
|
|
|
restructuring charges at our manufacturing operations in Mexico of
approximately $5.0 million; |
|
|
|
|
inventory write-downs of approximately $3.4 million related to two products;
and |
|
|
|
|
higher product warranty returns and related expenses of $1.2 million, primarily
related to our transition from manufacturing to sourcing. |
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses decreased by $4.7 million, or 12.2%, to $33.6
million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. As a
percentage of sales, operating expenses decreased to 32.2% in the second quarter of 2006 compared
to 32.9% in the 2005 period, primarily as the result of cost cutting initiatives. The following
expenses decreased in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the same period in 2005:
|
|
|
freight and handling expenses decreased by $1.4 million as the result of lower
sales and the movement of certain customers to freight collect programs; |
|
|
|
|
employee compensation decreased by $1.2 million due to lower average headcount; |
27
|
|
|
amortization expense decreased by $1.0 million, primarily related to the
write-off of the Tide Buzz license in the second quarter of 2005; and |
|
|
|
|
other expenses decreased by $1.1 million. |
Operating expenses in the second quarter of 2006 included $0.7 million in consulting fees paid
to Alvarez & Marsal, LLP.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense. SFAS 123R was adopted on January 1, 2006, which now
requires, among other items, the recognition of stock-based compensation expense in our results of
operations. We elected the modified prospective transition method; therefore, we did not restate
prior period results. Stock-based compensation expense was $0.1 million during the three months
ended June 30, 2006. Stock-based compensation expense is expected to total approximately $0.5
million for the full year of 2006, assuming no additional grants of stock-based compensation
awards.
Refer to Note 1 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for more information on
stock-based compensation
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased slightly to $2.7 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2006, as compared to $2.6 million for the second quarter of 2005. The increase was
the result of higher average interest rates despite lower average debt levels.
Taxes. Our tax provision is based on an estimated annual aggregation of the taxes on earnings
of each of our foreign and domestic operations. For the second quarter of 2006, Applica had an
effective tax rate of 26% before valuation allowances on deferred tax assets, as compared to 24%
for the second quarter of 2005 before valuation allowances on deferred tax assets.
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes requires that a valuation allowance be established
when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
A review of all available positive and negative evidence needs to be considered, including current
and past performance, the market environment in which a company operates, the use of past tax
credits and length of carry-back and carry-forward periods.
Forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when there is
negative objective evidence such as cumulative losses in recent years. Cumulative losses weigh
heavily in the overall assessment. As a result of the review undertaken at June 30, 2006, Applica
concluded that it was appropriate to record valuation allowances of $2.2 million for the second
quarter of 2006. We expect to realize the benefits of the remaining net deferred tax assets of
approximately $10.3 million as of June 30, 2006, primarily from identified tax planning strategies
in the U.S. and Argentina, as well as projected taxable income from other foreign operations.
We expect to continue to maintain a valuation allowance on future tax benefits in the U.S.
until an appropriate level of profitability is reached or we are able to develop tax strategies
that would enable us to conclude that it is more likely than not that an additional portion of our
deferred tax assets would be realized.
Earnings Per Share. Weighted average basic shares for the three-month period ended June 30,
2006 were 24,371,381. Weighted average basic shares for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005
were 24,139,188. All common stock equivalents were excluded from the diluted per share calculations
in the three-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 because their inclusion would have been
anti-dilutive. Potential common stock equivalents for the three-month period ended June 30, 2006
were options to purchase 1,708,454 shares of common stock with exercise prices ranging from $1.62
to $31.69. Potential common stock equivalents for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005 were
options to purchase 2,593,596 shares of common stock with exercise prices ranging from $3.63 to
$31.69.
28
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared To Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
Net Sales. Consolidated net sales decreased by $20.4 million to $208.5 million, a decrease of
8.9% from the first half of 2005.
Sales for the Household Product segment, net of intersegment sales in 2005, decreased $13.4
million to $190.5 million. For the first half of 2006:
|
|
|
sales of Black & Decker® branded products decreased by $5.7 million to $168.3 million; |
|
|
|
|
sales of Littermaid® branded products decreased by $2.0 million to $16.3 million; and |
|
|
|
|
sales of other branded products decreased by $5.7 million to $5.9 million. |
The decrease in Black & Decker® sales in the first half of 2006 compared to the same period in
2005 was primarily attributable to our decision to exit the home environment product category and
other non-profitable SKUs as part of our product and customer profitability review.
The decrease in sales of Littermaid® branded products for the first half of 2006 compared to
the same period in 2005 was attributable to supply shortages in the first quarter of 2006 related
to our transition to the next generation of automatic litter boxes. We offset a portion of the
shortfall in the second quarter of 2006 and expect to have the products to meet the demand for our
Littermaid® branded products in the second half of 2006.
Sales for the Professional Personal Care segment decreased by $5.6 million to $18.0 million
for the first half of 2006. This decrease was primarily the result of inventory management by our
major customers in the first quarter of 2006.
Sales for the Manufacturing segment were $28.9 million in the first half of 2005. During the
first half of 2005, intersegment sales for the Manufacturing segment were $27.5 million and
contract manufacturing sales were $1.4 million. Manufacturing operations ceased in October 2005.
Gross Profit. Applicas gross profit margin increased to 26.7% for the six months ended June
30, 2006 as compared to 18.2% for the same period in 2005. Gross profit for the first half of 2006
was negatively impacted by:
|
|
|
$3.7 million recorded in the first quarter of 2006 in connection with the
product recall; and |
|
|
|
|
the sale of inventory that included capitalized losses of $2.7 million related
to the closure of the manufacturing facility in Mexico. |
Gross profit for the first half of 2005 was negatively impacted by:
|
|
|
|
inventory write-downs of $12.8 million related to an adjustment to net
realizable value of two products; |
|
|
|
|
restructuring charges at our manufacturing operations in Mexico of $7.9 million; and |
|
|
|
|
higher product warranty returns and related expenses of $4.5 million. |
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses decreased $9.7 million, or 12.5%, for the first half
of 2006 to $67.8 million compared to the first half of 2005. These expenses decreased as a
percentage of sales to 32.5% in 2006 from 33.9% in the 2005 period primarily as the result of cost
cutting initiatives. The following expenses decreased in the first half of 2006 compared to the
same period in 2005:
|
|
|
employee compensation decreased by $3.3 million due to lower average headcount; |
|
|
|
|
occupancy costs decreased by $1.4 million due to lower rent and repairs and maintenance; |
29
|
|
|
amortization expenses decreased by $1.2 million, primarily related to the
write-off of the Tide Buzz license in the second quarter of 2005; |
|
|
|
|
freight and handling expenses decreased by $1.1 million as the result of lower
sales and the movement of certain customers to freight collect programs; |
|
|
|
|
professional services decreased by $1.1 million; and |
|
|
|
|
other expenses decreased by $1.6 million. |
Operating expenses in the first half of 2006 includes $1.8 million in consulting fees paid to
Alvarez & Marsal, LLP and $0.5 million in administrative expenses related to the closure of the
Mexican manufacturing facility.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense. SFAS 123R was adopted on January 1, 2006, which now
requires, among other items, the recognition of stock option expense in our results of operations.
We elected the modified prospective transition method; therefore, we did not restate prior period
results. Stock-based compensation expense was $0.3 million during the six months ended June 30,
2006. Stock-based compensation expense is expected to total approximately $0.5 million for the
full year of 2006, assuming no additional grants of stock-based compensation awards.
Refer to Note 1 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for more information on
stock-based compensation.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $0.4 million, or 7.4%, to $5.5 million for
the first half of 2006, as compared to $5.1 million for the first half of 2005. The increase was
the result of higher interest rates despite lower average debt levels.
Taxes. Applicas tax expense is based on an estimated annual aggregation of the taxes on
earnings of each of its foreign and domestic operations. For the first half of 2006, Applica
applied an effective tax rate of 29% on its losses from operations before additional valuation
allowances. The effective tax rate for the first half of 2005 was 26% before additional valuation
allowances.
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes requires that a valuation allowance be established
when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
A review of all available positive and negative evidence needs to be considered, including a
companys current and past performance, the market environment in which the company operates, the
use of past tax credits, length of carryback and carryforward periods.
Forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when there is
negative objective evidence such as cumulative losses in recent years. Cumulative losses weigh
heavily in the overall assessment. As a result of the review undertaken at June 30, 2006, Applica
concluded that it was appropriate to record valuation allowances of $6.6 million for the first half
of 2006. Applica expects to realize the benefits of the remaining net deferred tax assets of
approximately $10.3 million as of June 30, 2006, primarily from identified tax planning strategies
in the U.S. and Argentina, as well as projected taxable income from other countries.
The increase in the valuation allowance in the first half of 2006 primarily results from
losses in the U.S. operations that resulted in a tax benefit of $6.5 million. We expect to continue
to maintain a valuation allowance on future tax benefits, primarily in the U.S. until an
appropriate level of profitability is reached or we are able to develop tax strategies that would
enable us to conclude that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets
would be realized.
No tax provision is made for the undistributed earnings of the foreign subsidiaries that
Applica expects will be permanently reinvested in its operations outside the United States.
30
Earnings Per Share. Weighted average basic shares for the first half of 2006 were 24,278,904.
Weighted average basic shares for the first half of 2005 were 24,137,874. All common stock
equivalents have been excluded from the diluted per share calculations in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Potential
common stock equivalents for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were options to
purchase 1,706,733 and 2,588,204 shares of common stock, respectively, with exercise prices ranging
from $1.62 to $31.69.
31
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
In order to meet our cash requirements to support seasonal working capital needs and capital
expenditures, to pay interest, and to fund operating expenses, we intend to use our existing cash,
internally generated funds, and borrowings under our senior credit facility. Based on our current
internal estimates, we believe that cash provided from these sources will be adequate to meet our
cash requirements over the next twelve months. However, should the assumptions underlying our
estimates prove incorrect, our liquidity may be negatively impacted.
We have a senior revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks that provides for
borrowings on a revolving basis of up to $125 million with a $10 million sublimit for letters of
credit. The credit facility matures in November 2009.
Advances under the credit facility are governed by our collateral value, which is based upon
percentages of eligible accounts receivable and inventories. Under the amended facility, if we do
not maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0, we must maintain a minimum daily
availability under the borrowing base of $10 million and a minimum average monthly availability of
$13 million. If we maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of greater than 1.0 to 1.0, there is no
availability requirement and no availability block. As of June 30, 2006, our fixed charge coverage
ratio was less than 1.0 to 1.0. Factors impacting our ability to maintain that availability
include our ability to:
|
|
|
generate net earnings; |
|
|
|
|
maintain terms with our suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
manage inventory levels effectively; and |
|
|
|
|
maintain accounts receivables days sales outstanding. |
If we are unable to maintain the minimum availability or fail to obtain the consent of our
lenders to waive such requirements, our liquidity will be negatively affected. We believe that we
will be able to maintain such requirements or obtain our lenders consent to waive or amend such
requirements.
As of June 30, 2006, we were borrowing approximately $41.7 million under the senior credit
facility and had approximately $38.9 million available for future cash borrowings. However, at
June 30, 2006, our fixed charge coverage ratio was less than 1.0 to 1.0 and we were subject to a
$10 million daily block.
Operating Activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, our operations generated cash
of $28.3 million, compared with $16.5 million for same period in 2005. The improvement in
operating cash flows related primarily to lower working capital requirements. We anticipate
inventory levels will increase in future periods based on the seasonality of our business and the
demand for our products.
As part of our capital management, we review certain working capital metrics. For example, we
evaluate our accounts receivable and inventory levels through the computation of days sales
outstanding and days in inventory. The number of days sales outstanding at June 30, 2006 increased
slightly from the number of days sales outstanding at June 30, 2005 primarily as the result of a
higher portion of accounts receivable in Latin America at June 30, 2006 compared to June 30, 2005.
Average days in inventory at June 30, 2006 decreased in comparison to the same period in 2005. We
pre-built significant inventory in anticipation of the sale of our Hong Kong based manufacturing
operation, which was still on hand as of December 31, 2004. We also pre-built inventory in the
first half of 2005 as a result of the downsizing and closure of our manufacturing facility in
Mexico.
Investing Activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, investing activities generated
cash of $0.5 million compared to $1.3 million of cash generated in the six months ended June 30,
2005. The decrease in cash flows from investing activities was primarily the result of the
collection of $3.1 million from a former officer in the 2005 period, offset by proceeds in the 2006
period from the sale of assets related to the closure of our manufacturing operations in Mexico,
which ceased in October 2005. Additionally, we had higher capital expenditures in the first
quarter 2005 that were primarily related to the implementation of our enterprise resource planning
(ERP) system, which was placed into service in April 2005.
32
Capital expenditures for 2006 are expected to be approximately $4.0 million and will consist
of the following:
|
|
|
$2.3 million for tooling for new products; |
|
|
|
|
$1.3 million for computer and IT systems; and |
|
|
|
|
$0.4 million for other improvements. |
We plan to fund such capital expenditures with cash flow from operations and, if necessary,
borrowings under our senior credit facility.
Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities was $27.3 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2006, compared to cash used of $18.0 million in the six months ended June 30,
2005. Borrowings under our lines of credit in 2006 were lower than 2005, primarily attributable to
lower working capital requirements.
Capital Resources
Our primary sources of short-term capital are our cash flow from operations and borrowings
under the senior credit facility. Our credit facility is a $125 million asset-based senior secured
revolving credit facility maturing in November 2009.
At Applicas option, interest accrues on the loans made under the senior credit facility at
either:
|
|
|
LIBOR (adjusted for any reserves), plus a specified margin (determined by
Applicas fixed charge coverage ratio and set at 1.75% on June 30, 2006 and at
1.50% on August 1, 2006), which was 7.08% at June 30, 2006 and 6.90% at August 1,
2006; or |
|
|
|
|
the Base Rate (Bank of Americas prime rate), plus a specified margin (based
upon Applicas fixed charge coverage ratio, and was zero at June 30, 2006 and
August 1, 2006), which was 8.25% at June 30, 2006 and August 1, 2006. |
Swing loans up to $15.0 million bear interest at the Base Rate plus a specified margin
(determined based upon Applicas average quarterly availability and was zero at June 30, 2006 and
August 1, 2006), which was 8.25% at June 30, 2006 and August 1, 2006.
Management expects LIBOR borrowing margins under the senior credit facility to remain at
between 1.50% and 1.75% from July 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006. Management expects Base Rate
borrowing margins under the senior credit facility to remain at zero through December 31, 2006.
Advances under the credit facility are governed by our collateral value, which is based upon
percentages of eligible accounts receivable and inventories. Under the credit facility, if we do
not maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0, we must maintain a minimum daily
availability under the borrowing base of $10 million and a minimum average monthly availability of
$13 million. If we maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of greater than 1.0 to 1.0, there is no
availability requirement and no availability block. As of June 30, 2006, our fixed charge
coverage ratio was less than 1.0 to 1.0.
As of June 30, 2006, we were borrowing approximately $41.7 million under our senior credit
facility and had approximately $38.9 million available for future cash borrowings; provided
however, during the time in which our fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.0 to 1.0, we are
subject to a $10 million daily block. There were $1.2 million in letters of credit outstanding
under the credit facility at June 30, 2006. As of August 1, 2006, we were borrowing approximately
$53.1 million under the facility and had approximately $42.1 million available for future cash
borrowings. There were $1.2 million in letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility at
August 1, 2006.
We have classified the borrowings under the senior credit facility as a current liability in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 95-22 Balance Sheet Classifications of
Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements That Include Both a Subjective
Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box Arrangement.
33
Despite such classification, we have the ability and the intent to maintain these obligations
for longer than one year.
We also have senior subordinated notes bearing interest at a rate of 10%, payable
semiannually, and maturing in July 2008. The notes are general unsecured obligations of Applica
Incorporated and rank subordinate in right of payment to all senior debt of Applica and rank pari
passu in right of payment to all future subordinated indebtedness of Applica. The notes may be
redeemed at our option, in whole or in part, at par value. As of June 30, 2006 and August 1, 2006,
the outstanding principal balance was $55.8 million.
We have a $20 million term loan due November 2009. The term loan is secured by a lien on our
assets, which is subordinate to our senior revolving credit facility. The term loan bears interest
at the three-month LIBOR rate plus 625 basis points, which was set at 11.49% at June 30, 2006 and
11.72% at August 1, 2006. The term loan matures in November 2009 and requires no principal
payments until such time. As of June 30, 2006 and August 1, 2006, the outstanding principal
balance was $20.0 million.
At June 30, 2006, debt as a percent of total capitalization was 73.2%, as compared to 65.7% at
June 30, 2005.
Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal of, or to pay the interest on, or to
refinance, our indebtedness, or to fund planned capital expenditures, and marketing expenses will
depend on our future performance. Based upon the current level of operations and cash flow from
operations, we believe that we have adequate capital resources to service our debt and fund our
liquidity needs for the next year. However, the current level of operations may deteriorate, our
business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and future borrowings may not be
available under the credit facility in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our
indebtedness, including the outstanding 10% notes and term loan, or to fund our other liquidity
needs. In addition, we may not be able to effect any needed refinancing on commercially reasonable
terms or at all.
Use of Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies
Our unaudited consolidated financial statements are based on the selection of accounting
policies and the application of significant accounting estimates, some of which require management
to make significant assumptions. Actual results could differ materially from the estimated amounts.
We believe that some of the more critical estimates and related assumptions that affect our
financial condition and results of operations are in the areas of income taxes, the collectability
of accounts receivable, inventory valuation reserves, product liability claims and litigation and
long-lived assets.
Management continually evaluates its estimates and assumptions, which are based on historical
experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These
estimates and our actual results are subject to the risk factors included in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Forward Looking
Statement Disclosure above. We discuss our critical accounting estimates with our Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. For more information on critical accounting
estimates, refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Use of Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies included in our Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
SFAS No. 123R was adopted on January 1, 2006. Refer to Note 1 to our unaudited consolidated
financial statements for further information. There were no other accounting policies adopted
during the first half of 2006 that had a material effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncement
See
Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for information regarding a recent
accounting pronouncement.
34
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk Management
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes. Our objective is to manage the impact
of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and on the market value of our borrowings. We
maintain fixed rate debt as a percentage of our net debt between a minimum and maximum percentage,
which is set by policy.
It is our policy to enter into interest rate risk management transactions only to the extent
considered necessary to meet our objectives as set forth above. We do not enter into interest rate
risk management transactions for speculative purposes.
As of June 30, 2006, there were no outstanding interest rate management contracts. We will
initiate interest rate risk management contracts in 2006 only to the extent considered necessary to
meet our objectives.
Foreign Exchange Risk Management
We transact business globally and are subject to risks associated with changing foreign
exchange rates. Our objective is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with
foreign exchange rate changes to allow management to focus attention on core business issues and
challenges. By policy, we maintain hedge coverage between minimum and maximum percentages of our
forecasted foreign exchange exposures for periods not to exceed 18 months. The gains and losses on
these contracts offset changes in the value of the related exposures.
We enter into various foreign currency hedging contracts that change in value as foreign
exchange rates change to protect the value of our existing foreign currency assets and liabilities,
commitments and forecasted foreign currency revenues. We use option strategies and forward
contracts that provide for the sale of foreign currencies to hedge forecasted revenues and
expenses. We also use forward contracts to hedge foreign currency assets and liabilities. While
these hedging instruments are subject to fluctuations in value, such fluctuations are offset by
changes in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. The principal currencies hedged
historically have been the Mexican peso, Hong Kong dollar and Canadian dollar.
It is our policy to enter into foreign currency transactions only to the extent considered
necessary to meet our objectives as set forth above. We do not enter into foreign currency
transactions for speculative purposes. As of June 30, 2006, there were no forward exchange
contracts or purchased options outstanding.
Additional Information
For additional information, see Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk in Applicas Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We have carried out an evaluation under the
supervision of management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO
have concluded that, as of June 30, 2006, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, was recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the rules and regulations of the SEC, and include
controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in such
reports was accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Since the evaluation date by our management of Applicas internal controls over financial
reporting, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over
financial reporting.
35
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does
not expect that our disclosure or internal controls will prevent all errors or fraud. A control
system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control
system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must
be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective
control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Despite these
limitations, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (1) are
designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and (2) do provide
reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.
36
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Shareholder Litigation. Applica is a defendant in the consolidated class action complaint
entitled Scott Schultz and Joseph Rothman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiffs v. Applica Incorporated, Harry D. Schulman, Terry L. Polistina and Michael
Michienzi, Defendants, Case No. 06-60149-CIV-DIMITROULEAS, which was first filed in the United
States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on February 3, 2006 and amended on July 10,
2006.
The consolidated purported class action complaint was filed on behalf of purchasers of Applica
Incorporated common stock during the period between November 4, 2004 and April 28, 2005. The
complaint charges Applica and certain executive officers with violations of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. The complaint alleges that, throughout the class period, Applica issued materially
false and misleading statements regarding its business, operations, management and the intrinsic
value of its common stock. The complaint further alleges that these statements were materially
false and misleading on the asserted basis that they failed to disclose that Applica:
|
|
|
was experiencing decreasing demand for its products; in particular, demand for two key
products were not meeting internal expectations and were experiencing quality and design
defects; |
|
|
|
|
was materially overstating its net worth by failing to timely write down the value of
its inventory which had become obsolete and unsaleable; |
|
|
|
|
was experiencing higher product warranty returns, which it had not appropriately reserved for; |
|
|
|
|
lacked adequate internal controls; and |
|
|
|
|
issued financial statements during the class period were not prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and, therefore, were materially false and
misleading. |
The plaintiffs seek, among other relief, to be declared a class, to be awarded compensatory
damages, rescission rights, unspecified damages and attorneys fees and costs. Applica believes
the claims are without merit. Applica intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit but may be unable
to successfully resolve the disputes without incurring significant expenses. Due to the early
stage of these proceedings, any potential loss cannot presently be determined with respect to this
litigation matter, However, Applica believes any losses will be covered by applicable insurance
coverage.
In February 2006, the SEC requested that Applica voluntarily produce certain documents in
connection with an informal inquiry related to these matters. Applica has responded to the request
for documents and other information and intends to fully cooperate with the SEC in this matter.
Product Recall. In June 2006, Applicas U.S. operating subsidiary, Applica Consumer
Products, Inc., in cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission announced a
voluntary recall of approximately 410,000 units of the Black & Decker® branded TCM 800 and TCM 805
thermal coffeemakers. Applicas Canadian operating subsidiary, Applica Canada Corporation, also
recalled approximately 40,000 units of these thermal coffeemakers in Canada. Applica recorded a
charge to cost of goods sold of approximately $3.7 million in the first quarter of 2006 related to
the recall. Management does not believe the ultimate liability will be materially different.
As of August 1, 2006, no litigation has been filed in connection with property damage or
bodily injury relating to the recalled product discussed above; however, several claims for minor
property damages have been made. We believe that the amount of ultimate liability of these claims,
if any, is not likely to have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations. However, as the outcome of litigation is difficult to predict, significant changes in
the estimated exposures could occur.
The estimated charges associated with the product recall related to the Household Products
reportable segment.
37
Other Matters. We are subject to legal proceedings, products liability claims and other claims
that arise in the ordinary course of our business. In the opinion of management, the amount of
ultimate liability, if any, in excess of applicable insurance coverage, is not likely to have a
material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. However, as the
outcome of litigation or other claims is difficult to predict, significant changes in the estimated
exposures could occur.
As a distributor of consumer products, we are also subject to the Consumer Products Safety
Act, which empowers the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) to exclude from the market
products that are found to be unsafe or hazardous. We receive inquiries from the CPSC in the
ordinary course of our business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In the course of operations, we are subject to certain risk factors, which are set forth above
in Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward Looking Statement Disclosure and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as set forth
below, there have been no material changes to any of the risk factors disclosed in our most
recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
We may not be able to obtain governmental approvals of the proposed spin-off and merger
on the proposed terms and schedule. |
|
|
|
|
We may not be able to obtain approval of the merger from our shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
The new company may not be able to integrate the two businesses successfully. |
|
|
|
|
The new company may not be able to fully realize the anticipated cost savings and
synergies from the proposed transaction within the proposed time frame. |
|
|
|
|
There may be significant disruption from the spin-off and merger making it more
difficult to maintain relationships with customers, employees or suppliers. |
|
|
|
|
Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex may not be able to obtain New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ approval for
the listing of the new companys common stock. |
|
|
|
|
Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex may not be able to effect a registration statement concerning the shares
of the new company to be distributed to Applica shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
Customers may not accept the new combined entity. |
|
|
|
|
The rescission offer related to our 401(k) plan may not bar claims relating to our
non-compliance with securities laws or any other applicable law, and we may potentially be
liable for further rescission or damages. |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At Applicas Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 9, 2006, the shareholders voted to
elect Susan J. Ganz, J. Maurice Hopkins and Thomas J. Kane as Class I Directors and Christopher B.
Madison as a Class II Director. Continuing members of the Board of Directors of Applica include
Leonard Glazer, Paul K. Sugrue, Ware H. Grove, Jerald I. Rosen and Harry D. Schulman.
In addition, the shareholders (i) approved an amendment to Applicas Second Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation to eliminate the super-majority shareholder approval
requirement for certain business combinations and (ii) disapproved an amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation to authorize 1,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock. The shareholders
also ratified the reappointment of Grant Thornton LLP as Applicas independent accountants for the
year ended December 31, 2006.
The number of votes cast for or against with respect to each of the nominees for director was
as follows:
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee |
|
For |
|
|
Against |
|
Susan J. Ganz |
|
|
20,398,345 |
|
|
|
2,813,952 |
|
J. Maurice Hopkins |
|
|
20,379,566 |
|
|
|
2,832,731 |
|
Thomas J. Kane |
|
|
20,359,067 |
|
|
|
2,853,230 |
|
Christopher B. Madison |
|
|
20,460,277 |
|
|
|
2,752,020 |
|
The number of votes cast for or against or abstained from voting with respect to the amendment
to Applicas Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to eliminate the
super-majority shareholder approval requirement for certain business combinations was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
22,243,245
|
|
865,511
|
|
103,540 |
The number of votes cast for or against or abstained from voting with respect to the amendment
to the Articles of Incorporation to authorize 1,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
7,792,017
|
|
8,228,574
|
|
87,454 |
The number of votes cast for or against or abstained from voting with respect to the
reappointment of Grant Thornton LLP was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
22,458,864
|
|
400,818
|
|
352,614 |
39
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Exhibits: |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State
of Florida on May 10, 2006 |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPLICA INCORPORATED
(Registrant)
|
|
August 4, 2006 |
By: |
/s/ Terry L. Polistina
|
|
|
|
Terry L. Polistina |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
August 4, 2006 |
By: |
/s/ Ivan R. Habibe
|
|
|
|
Ivan R. Habibe |
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
|
41