Page
|
|
The
Company
|
1 |
Risk
Factors
|
3 |
Special
Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
|
16 |
Use
of Proceeds
|
16 |
Issuance
of Securities to Selling Stockholders
|
16 |
Selling
Stockholders
|
18 |
Plan
of Distribution
|
22 |
Legal
Matters
|
23 |
Experts
|
24 |
Where
You Can Find More Information
|
24 |
Information
Incorporated by Reference
|
24 |
· |
OurHyperSonic
sound, or HSS, technology is a new parametric speaker technology
that
creates sound “in the air.” Sound is generated along an air column using
ultrasonic frequencies, which are those above the normal range
of hearing.
The HSS sound beam is highly directional and maintains sound volume
over
longer distances than traditional loudspeakers. We believe our
substantial
intellectual property portfolio and pioneering HSS products support
our
leadership position in the field of parametric non-linear acoustics
for
sound reproduction, as we continue to improve and release higher
reliability, lower distortion and higher output level models of
our HSS
products.
|
· |
Our
LRAD and MRAD products incorporate technology which produces variable
intensity acoustical sound intended for use in long-range and medium-range
delivery of directional sound information, effectively a supercharged
megaphone. Both LRAD and MRAD products are designed and used as
directed
hailing and warning systems by both government and commercial customers.
We believe our LRAD and MRAD product innovation, our growing engineering
capabilities, and our manufacturing and marketing competencies
have
established us as the leader in this new marketplace. We are marketing
these products throughout the U.S. Department of Defense as “The Sound of
Force Protection™”, and expanding target markets to include law
enforcement and commercial customers with significant security
concerns.
In fiscal 2004, we developed a remote controlled pan/tilt version
of LRAD
for critical infrastructure force protection applications, and
we
demonstrated our competency to engineer additional new sound solutions
for
the U.S. Department of Defense. In 2005, we introduced the MRAD.
MRAD is
about half the size and weight of LRAD, and provides effective
hailing and
warning at approximately half the range of LRAD. The portable MRAD
is
expected to be particularly effective on armored vehicles for urban
warfare, shorter-range checkpoints and access denial, plus multiple
applications for local, national and international law enforcement.
|
· |
Our
NeoPlanar® technology is a thin film magnetic speaker that produces sound
of high quality, low distortion and high volume. NeoPlanar applications
include high-end sound, emergency notification and public address
systems.
In fiscal 2004, we began marketing NeoPlanar for use in large indoor
spaces and in outdoor environments for emergency notification.
NeoPlanar
offers customers a new capability by delivering remarkably intelligible
communications in difficult spaces such as aircraft hangar bays
and at
distances up to one-half
mile.
|
· |
Our
SoundCluster™ technology is a new multi-element speaker cluster optimized
for even sound coverage over large areas. Our SoundCluster product
offers
an improved level of intelligibility and clarity in high ambient
noise
environments. The SoundCluster satisfies flight deck safety and
large area
emergency notification requirements. The flexible and ruggedized
SoundCluster design lends itself to installation in harsh environments,
where conventional speakers may fail. During fiscal 2004, we deployed
the
first SoundCluster for use on a U.S. naval
warship.
|
·
|
government
spending levels;
|
·
|
introduction
of new competing technologies;
|
·
|
failure
of sales from our Government Group and Commercial Group to meet
planned
projections;
|
·
|
product
mix and effect on margins; and
|
·
|
acceptance
of our products in new markets.
|
·
|
our
ability to manufacture reliable products that have the features
that are
required by our customers;
|
·
|
our
ability to expand relationships with existing customers and to
develop
relationships with new customers that will lead to additional orders
for
our products;
|
·
|
our
ability to develop and expand new markets for directed sound products;
and
|
·
|
our
ability to develop international product distribution directly
or through
strategic partners.
|
·
|
our
ability to develop and supply sound reproduction components to
customers,
distributors or OEMs or to license our technologies;
|
·
|
market
acceptance of and changes in demand for our products or products
of our
customers;
|
·
|
gains
or losses of significant customers, distributors or strategic
relationships;
|
·
|
unpredictable
volume and timing of customer orders;
|
·
|
the
availability, pricing and timeliness of delivery of components
for our
products and OEM products;
|
·
|
fluctuations
in the availability of manufacturing capacity or manufacturing
yields and
related manufacturing costs;
|
·
|
the
timing of new technological advances, product announcements or
introductions by us, by OEMs or licensees and by our competitors;
|
·
|
product
obsolescence and the management of product transitions and inventory;
|
·
|
unpredictable
warranty costs associated with new product models;
|
·
|
production
delays by customers, distributors, OEMs or by us or our suppliers;
|
·
|
seasonal
fluctuations in sales;
|
·
|
the
conditions of other industries, such as military and commercial
industries, into which our technologies may be licensed;
|
·
|
general
consumer electronics industry conditions, including changes in
demand and
associated effects on inventory and inventory practices;
|
·
|
general
economic conditions that could affect the timing of customer orders
and
capital spending and result in order cancellations or rescheduling;
and
|
·
|
general
political conditions in this country and in various other parts
of the
world that could affect spending for the products that we offer.
|
·
|
the
timing and extent of our research and development efforts;
|
·
|
investments
and costs of maintaining or protecting our intellectual property;
|
·
|
the
extent of marketing and sales efforts to promote our products and
technologies; and
|
·
|
the
timing of personnel and consultant
hiring.
|
·
|
cease
selling, incorporating or using products or services that incorporate
the
challenged intellectual property;
|
·
|
obtain
a license from the holder of the infringed intellectual property
right,
which license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all;
and
|
·
|
redesign
products or services that incorporate the disputed
technology.
|
·
|
changes
in tariff regulations;
|
·
|
political
instability, war, terrorism and other political risks;
|
·
|
foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations;
|
·
|
establishing
and maintaining relationships with local distributors and dealers;
|
·
|
lengthy
shipping times and accounts receivable payment cycles;
|
·
|
import
and export licensing requirements;
|
·
|
compliance
with a variety of foreign laws and regulations, including unexpected
changes in taxation and regulatory requirements;
|
·
|
greater
difficulty in safeguarding intellectual property than in the U.S.;
and
|
·
|
difficulty
in staffing and managing geographically diverse
operations.
|
·
|
include
provisions that allow the government agency to terminate the contract
without penalty under some circumstances;
|
·
|
be
subject to purchasing decisions of agencies that are subject to
political
influence;
|
·
|
contain
onerous procurement procedures; and
|
·
|
be
subject to cancellation if government funding becomes
unavailable.
|
·
|
problems
assimilating the purchased technologies, products or business operations;
|
·
|
problems
maintaining uniform standards, procedures, controls and policies;
|
·
|
unanticipated
costs associated with the acquisition;
|
·
|
diversion
of management’s attention from our core business;
|
·
|
adverse
effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers;
|
·
|
risks
associated with entering new markets in which we have no or limited
prior
experience;
|
·
|
potential
loss of key employees of acquired businesses; and
|
·
|
increased
legal and accounting costs as a result of the newly adopted rules
and
regulations related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
·
|
our
anticipated or actual operating results;
|
·
|
developments
concerning our sound reproduction technologies;
|
·
|
technological
innovations or setbacks by us or our competitors;
|
·
|
conditions
in the consumer electronics market;
|
·
|
announcements
of merger or acquisition transactions;
|
·
|
changes
in personnel within our company; and
|
·
|
other
events or factors and general economic and market
conditions.
|
Selling
Stockholder
|
Common
Stock Beneficially Owned Prior to Offering
|
Common
Stock Underlying Warrants Beneficially Owned Prior to
Offering
|
Common
Stock to be Offered Pursuant to this Prospectus
(1)
|
Common
Stock Beneficially Owned After the Offering
(2)
|
|||
Special
Situations Fund III, L.P. (3)
|
726,458
|
(4)
|
395,479
|
1,112,692
|
--
|
--
|
|
Special
Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. (3)
|
301,229
|
166,101
|
467,330
|
--
|
--
|
||
Special
Situations Technology Fund, L.P. (3)
|
72,599
|
(5)
|
31,638
|
89,015
|
--
|
--
|
|
Special
Situations Technology Fund II, L.P. (3)
|
452,986
|
(6)
|
197,739
|
556,345
|
--
|
--
|
|
SDS
Capital Group SPC, Ltd. (7)
|
204,918
|
169,813
|
(8)
|
317,913
|
--
|
--
|
|
Iroquois
Master Fund Ltd. (9)
|
614,754
|
338,983
|
953,737
|
--
|
--
|
||
Pequot
Scout Fund, L.P. (10)
|
405,023
|
223,335
|
628,358
|
--
|
--
|
||
Pequot
Mariner Master Fund, L.P. (10)
|
209,731
|
115,649
|
325,380
|
--
|
--
|
||
E.
H. Hitchcock Charitable Foundation (11)
|
--
|
3,750
|
3,750
|
--
|
--
|
||
George
A. Long (12)
|
51,200
|
(13)
|
7,500
|
7,500
|
--
|
--
|
|
James
& Josephine Zolin (12)
|
328,900
|
(13)
|
101,800
|
(14)
|
7,500
|
--
|
--
|
Patience
Partners LP (15)
|
5,000
|
(13)
|
3,750
|
3,750
|
--
|
--
|
|
Richard
G. Daniels (12)
|
64,102
|
(13)
|
36,250
|
(16)
|
3,750
|
--
|
--
|
Robert
D. van Roijen Jr. (15)
|
20,000
|
(13)
|
15,000
|
15,000
|
--
|
--
|
|
Urban
LaRiccia (12)
|
--
|
3,750
|
3,750
|
--
|
--
|
||
Norris
Family 1997 Trust (17)
|
3,629,015
|
(13)
|
37,500
|
37,500
|
|||
Sunrise
Capital, Inc. (18)
|
35,000
|
(13)
|
122,500
|
(19)
|
7,500
|
--
|
--
|
Sunrise
Management, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (18)
|
38,000
|
(13)
|
33,500
|
(20)
|
7,500
|
--
|
--
|
Philip
& Thea Putnam (21)
|
33,500
|
(13)
|
7,500
|
7,500
|
--
|
--
|
|
Greg
Endsley (22)
|
5,250
|
--
|
5,250
|
--
|
--
|
||
Douglas
Paschall (22)
|
5,852
|
(23)
|
--
|
5,250
|
--
|
--
|
|
Gordon
& Holmes, A Partnership of Professional Corporations
(24)
|
7,000
|
--
|
7,000
|
--
|
--
|
||
Jackson
Strategic, Inc. (25)
|
30,000
|
--
|
30,000
|
--
|
--
|
(1)
|
Includes
the shares of common stock which are the subject of this
prospectus as
follows: 2,916,351 shares of common stock previously issued
and 1,686,919
shares of common stock that may be acquired by the selling
stockholders
upon exercise of their respective warrants.
|
(2)
|
Assumes
that all shares included in this prospectus and any other
shares held
before the commencement of the offering are sold and that
the selling
stockholders do not acquire any additional shares of our
common
stock..
|
(3)
|
Each
of these selling stockholders is a July 2005 Financing
stockholder. MGP
Advisors Limited Partnership, or MGP, is the general partner
of the
Special Situations Fund III, L.P. AWM Investment Company,
Inc., or AWM, is
the general partner of MGP. SST Advisers, L.L.C., or SSTA,
is the general
partner of, and investment adviser to, the Special Situations
Technology
Fund, L.P. and Special Situations Technology Fund II, L.P.
MG Advisers,
L.L.C., or MG, is the general partner of, and investment
adviser to, the
Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. Austin W.
Marxe and David M.
Greenhouse are the principal owners of MGP, AWM, SSTA and
MG, and are
principally responsible for the selection, acquisition,
voting and
disposition of the portfolio securities by each investment
adviser on
behalf of its fund. Both Messrs. Marxe and Greenhouse share
voting and
dispositive power with respect to shares held by these
selling
stockholders.
|
(4)
|
9,245
of these shares were acquired in open market transactions
prior to the
July 2005 Financing and are not being offered under this
prospectus.
|
(5)
|
15,222
of these shares were acquired in open market transactions
prior to the
July 2005 Financing and are not being offered under this
prospectus.
|
(6)
|
94,380
of these shares were acquired in open market transactions
prior to the
July 2005 Financing and are not being offered under this
prospectus.
|
(7)
|
A
July 2005 Financing stockholder. SDS Management, LLC, or
SDSM, is the
investment manager of SDS Capital Group SPC, Ltd. Mr. Steve
Darby is the
Managing Member of SDSM. Mr. Steve Darby and SDSM each
may be deemed to
have shared voting and dispositive power with respect to
shares held by
SDS Capital Group SPC, Ltd. BayStar Capital II, L.P., an
affiliate of SDS
Capital Group SPC, Ltd., owns a warrant issued in connection
with a
previous financing. Mr. Steve Darby may be deemed to have
voting and
dispositive power with respect to shares held by BayStar
Capital II,
L.P.
|
(8)
|
56,818
of these shares are subject to a warrant issued to SDS
Merchant Fund, L.P.
in connection with the July 2003 Financing, and are not
being offered
under this prospectus.
|
(9)
|
A
July 2005 Financing stockholder. Mr. Joshua Silverman has
voting and
dispositive power with respect to shares held by Iroquois
Master Fund
Ltd.
|
(10)
|
Each
of these selling stockholders is a July 2005 Financing
stockholder. Pequot
Capital Management, Inc., or PCM, is the investment manager
of Pequot
Scout Fund, L.P. and Pequot Mariner Master Fund, L.P.
and the beneficial
owner of the listed securities. Mr. Arthur J. Samberg
is the sole
shareholder of PCM and has voting and dispositive power
with respect to
shares held by Pequot Scout Fund, L.P. and Pequot Mariner
Master Fund,
L.P. In August 2004, an affiliate of these selling stockholders
purchased
shares in a private placement of a broker-dealer admitted
to membership in
the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
|
(11)
|
A
December 2004 Financing stockholder. Mr. Harrison H.
Augur is the trustee
of E. H. Hitchcock Charitable Foundation and has both
voting and
dispositive power with respect to shares held by E. H.
Hitchcock
Charitable Foundation.
|
(12)
|
A
December 2004 Financing stockholder.
|
(13)
|
None
of these shares is being offered under this prospectus.
|
(14)
|
94,300
of these shares are subject to warrants issued to James
and/or Josephine
Zolin in connection with various financings, and are
not being offered
under this prospectus.
|
(15)
|
Each
of these selling stockholders is a December 2004 Financing
stockholder.
Messrs. Robert D. van Roijen Jr. and Harrison Augor are
the general
partners of Patience Partners LP and share voting and
dispositive power
with respect to shares held by Patience Partners LP.
|
(16)
|
7,500
of these shares are subject to a warrant issued to Mr.
Richard G. Daniels
in connection with a previous financing, and are not
being offered under
this prospectus. 25,000 of these shares are subject to
a warrant issued to
Richard and Mary Daniels Family Trust in connection with
a previous
financing, and are not being offered under this prospectus.
|
(17)
|
The
Norris Family 1997 Trust is a December 2004 Financing
stockholder. The
trust has two trustees, Mr. Elwood G. Norris and Ms.
Stephanie A. Norris,
who share voting and dispositive power with respect to
shares held by the
Norris Family 1997 Trust. Mr. Elwood G. Norris has been
one of our
directors since August 1990 and currently serves as the
chairman of our
board. Ms. Stephanie A. Norris is the wife of Mr. Elwood
G.
Norris.
|
(18)
|
Each
of these selling stockholders is a December 2004 Financing
stockholder.
Mr. James Barnes and Ms. Takako Barnes are the sole trustees
of Sunrise
Management, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and are officers
and directors of
Sunrise Capital, Inc. Mr. James Barnes and Ms. Takako
Barnes are also
trustees of the Palermo Trust, which owns 124,500 shares
of our common
stock and warrants to acquire 29,500 shares of our common
stock issued in
connection with several of our previous financings. Mr.
James Barnes and
Ms. Takako Barnes share voting and dispositive power
with respect to
shares held by these selling stockholders and the Palermo
Trust.
|
(19)
|
115,000
of these shares are subject to warrants issued to Sunrise
Capital, Inc. in
connection with various financings and as payment for
services, and are
not being offered under this prospectus.
|
(20)
|
26,000
of these shares are subject to warrants issued to Sunrise
Management, Inc.
Profit Sharing Plan in connection with various financings,
and are not
being offered under this prospectus.
|
(21)
|
A
December 2004 Financing stockholder. Mr. Philip Putnam
is a principal of
Flagstone Securities, a broker-dealer admitted to membership
in the
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
|
(22)
|
An
ESI stockholder.
|
(23)
|
602
of these shares are held by the children of Mr. Douglas
Paschall, with
respect to which he has voting and dispositive power,
and are not being
offered under this prospectus.
|
(24)
|
An
ESI stockholder. Mr. Frederic L. Gordon and Ms. Rhonda
J. Holmes are
partners of Gordon & Holmes, A Partnership of Professional
Corporations, and share voting power with respect to
shares held by the
firm.
|
(25)
|
Mr.
Jonathan A. Berg is the sole stockholder of Jackson Strategic,
Inc. and
has voting and dispositive power with respect to shares
held by Jackson
Strategic, Inc. Mr. Jonathan A. Berg beneficially owns
25,400 shares of
our common stock and a warrant to acquire 50,000 additional
shares of our
common stock. Mr. Jonathan A. Berg’s IRA additionally holds 120,809 shares
of our common stock and warrants to acquire 37,000 additional
shares of
our common stock.
|
·
|
ordinary
brokerage transactions and transactions in which the
broker-dealer
solicits purchasers;
|
·
|
block
trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell
the shares as agent
but may position and resell a portion of the block
as principal to
facilitate the transaction;
|
·
|
purchases
by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer
for its
account;
|
·
|
an
exchange distribution in accordance with the rules
of the applicable
exchange;
|
·
|
privately
negotiated transactions;
|
·
|
short
sales;
|
·
|
through
the writing or settlement of options or other hedging
transactions,
whether through an options exchange or
otherwise;
|
·
|
broker-dealers
may agree with the selling stockholders to sell a specified
number of such
shares at a stipulated price per share;
and
|
·
|
a
combination of any such methods of
sale.
|
·
|
Annual
report on Form 10-K, as amended, for our fiscal
year ended September 30,
2004;
|
·
|
Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q, as amended, for our fiscal
quarters ended December
31, 2004 and March 31, 2005;
|
·
|
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, as amended, for our fiscal
quarter ended June 30,
2005;
|
·
|
Current
Reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on
November 22, 2004, December 17, 2004, January 18,
2005 (amended January
21, 2005), January 31, 2005, March 21, 2005, March
24, 2005, March 25,
2005, April 1, 2005, May 3, 2005 (with respect
to disclosure made under
Items 1.01 and 3.02 only), June 17, 2005, July
1, 2005, July 6, 2005, July
13, 2005, July 19, 2005 and August 23, 2005;
and
|
·
|
Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB, effective August 1, 1994,
which includes a
description of our common stock.
|
·
|
We
also incorporate by reference all documents we
file in the future pursuant
to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of
1934 after the date of this prospectus and prior
to the termination of the
offering are also incorporated by reference and
are an important part of
this prospectus.
|