================================================================================

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
                   PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Filed by the Registrant [ ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [X]
    Check the appropriate box:
     [ ]   Preliminary Proxy Statement
     [ ]   Confidential, for Use of the Commission only (as permitted by
           Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
     [ ]   Definitive Proxy Statement
     [ ]   Definitive Additional Materials
     [X]   Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12


                          NORTHFIELD LABORATORIES INC.

                (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                C. ROBERT COATES
                                ----------------

     (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]  No fee required.
[ ]  $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), 14a-6(i)(2) or
     Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
[ ]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
     1)     Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
     2)     Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
     3)     Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
            pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
            the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
     4)     Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
     5)     Total fee
            paid:
[ ]  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
     0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
     previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
     or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
     1)     Amount Previously Paid:
     2)     Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
     3)     Filing Party: C. Robert Coates
     4)     Date Filed: July 31, 2002


================================================================================


Press Release

SOURCE:  C. Robert Coates

Northfield Laboratories Sends 'Mixed Message' by Rehiring DeWoskin; Coates,
Williams Vow to Continue Fight as Independent Director Candidates

LAKE FOREST, Ill., July 31 - C. Robert Coates and Bert R. Williams III said the
resignation of  Richard E. DeWoskin as chairman and chief executive officer at
Northfield Laboratories, Inc.(NASDAQ: NFLD) sent a mixed message when the
company turned around and retained him as a consultant earning an even higher
salary.

"The management shakeup was a good first step, but keeping DeWoskin on as an
active participant will encumber attempts by Northfield to reshape its
priorities," said the two independent candidates seeking seats on the board of
the Evanston, Ill.-based medical research company. They vowed to press ahead
with their proxy fight.

Coates said DeWoskin's resignation directly reflected shareholder displeasure
with his performance, mounting concerns about the company's plummeting stock
price and the refusal by the FDA to even review Northfield's application for its
developmental blood-substitute product, PolyHeme.

Through December, 2004, Northfield will pay DeWoskin $26,962 a month in
consulting fees, an amount higher than his previous base salary of $23,640 a
month, the company disclosed in a Schedule 14A filing. After 2004 DeWoskin and
Northfield may continue this compensation by mutual agreement.

"Big bucks for no well-defined duties or hours. What a deal directors cut for
DeWoskin," Coates observed. The compensation committee, made up of directors
Bruce Chelberg and Jack Olshansky, also noted that as part of DeWoskin's
separation agreement he remains entitled to receive a $278,048 bonus if
Northfield receives federal approval for commercial sale in the United States of
PolyHeme by year end 2004.

"Northfield's lackluster performance in the stock market reflects its
indecisiveness," Coates said. "And when the stock jumped last week on the
management shakeup, nearly doubling, that sent a clear message that DeWoskin's
presence was worth less than nothing," Coates said.

Coates and Williams derived a sense of deja vu from goals announced by
DeWoskin's successor, Dr. Steven A. Gould, one of Northfield's founders and
president. Among those priorities were to jump start necessary approvals for the
company's PolyHeme, to nail down a partnership with a major pharmaceutical
company and to elevate Northfield's profile with investors. "It looks like
Northfield's directors copied our plan for the company almost word for word. Now
they need to implement this plan," said Coates. "The only assurance that they
will do so is our proxy contest. We will continue our campaign."

Coates blasted Northfield's "so-called nominating committee" which totally
ignored Williams' credentials and opted for their own hand-picked candidates.
Williams, who was never interviewed by Northfield's directors, said he brings to
the table 20 years of experience in the medical industry. "I know what marketing
is about and I know what the FDA is all about," he said, adding, "You look at
the company and where it's at. Look at its moves, both in the past and recently,
and as a shareholder you must ask yourself: Why do we allow it to continue?"

Coates called the nominating process a "charade conducted in a desperate attempt
to keep shareholders from having true independent representation."

"Northfield Laboratories needs a blood substitute of its own because the company
has bled so much talent in past years," said Coates, adding "And it also needs
new blood on its board - directors that are truly accountable."

He questioned the independence of a board-nominated candidate like Dr. Paul M.
Ness, a professor of pathology, medicine and oncology at Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine, noting that Ness is on record for receiving
$80,000 in consulting fees from Northfield during the latest fiscal year and
will continue receiving consulting fees even when he serves on the board. "This
totally compromises one's job as an independent director. You can't have it both
ways," said Coates.

Similarly, the nomination of John F. Bierbaum, executive vice president of
PepsiAmericas Inc., amounts to overkill.

If both Bierbaum and current director Bruce Chelberg, who is chairman emeritus
of Whitman Corp., were to serve on Northfield's board, that would give Pepsi
interests "two seats at the table," said Coates. (PepsiAmericas was created
through the merger of the former PepsiAmericas with Whitman in 2000.) Under that
scenario Pepsi, which owns 10.5 percent of the outstanding shares, would control
25 percent of the board of directors. "Clearly, that's out of balance," said
Coates, urging that "one of the two of them should step aside for a more
independent shareholder representative."

Coates said, "Like the other incumbent directors, Mr. Chelberg has already
demonstrated his inability to advance this company. Mr. Bierbaum appears fully
capable of leading and representing the interests of PepsiAmericas, while Mr.
Chelberg would simply be 'just another passenger on the train'."

Coates said shareholder support of his campaign has "spurred on directors to
finally take action to increase Northfield's share price and gain approval of
the company's life-saving product. Dick DeWoskin's resignation appeared to be an
important first step.  However, the consulting agreement now makes it look like
he may actually stay on, hiding behind the curtain and continuing to pull all of
the strings at Northfield."

Contact information

If you are a shareholder and have any comments, suggestions or questions, please
call Simon Goldberg of The Robert Coates Group at 1-800-295-0841, extension 240
or e-mail us at .

SOURCE:  C. Robert Coates