UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 000-51696

Trulite, Inc.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

   
20-1372858
  
   
(I.R.S. employer
  
 
incorporation or organization)
  
identification number)
  

1401 McKinney Street
Suite 900
Houston, TX 77010
(Address of principal executive offices)

Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (713) 888-0660

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

None.

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share
(Title of Class)

Check whether issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act o.
 
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o.
 
 
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No  x
    
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K . o 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer:
o
 
Accelerated filer:
o
 
Non-accelerated filer: 
o(Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
  
Smaller reporting company: x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No x
 
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $4,552,955 as of June 30, 2007.

Number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock, 21,201,270 shares outstanding at March 31, 2008. Preferred Stock, no shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2008.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the Company’s 2008 annual meeting of stockholders, which is to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K, to the extent described in Part III.
 
2
 
PART I  
 
Item 1.  Business
   
Item 1A. Risk Factors
   
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
   
Item 2. Property
   
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
   
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
   
PART II
   
Item 5.
 Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
   
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
   
Item 7. Management's Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations
   
Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
   
Item 8. Financial Statements
   
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
   
Item 9A (T). Disclosure Controls and Procedures
   
Item 9B. Other Information
   
PART III
   
Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 
   
Item 11. Executive Compensation
   
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
   
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
   
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
   
PART IV
   
Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
 
3
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are “forward-looking statements,” which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual financial or operating results, performances, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements not to occur or be under realized. These forward-looking statements generally are based on our best estimates of future results, performances, or achievements, current conditions and assumptions. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “can,” “could,” “project,” “expect,” “believe,” “plan,” “predict,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “continue,” “potential,” “would,” “should,” “aim,” “opportunity,” or similar terms, variations of those terms or the negative of those terms, or other variations of those terms or comparable words or expressions. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
 
 
1.
our ability to develop and manufacture commercially viable products
 
 
2.
the continued expansion of our business
 
 
3.
general economic conditions in both foreign and domestic markets
 
 
4.
lack of growth in our industry
 
 
5.
our ability to comply with government regulations
 
 
6.
a failure to manage our business effectively and profitably
 
 
7.
our ability to sell both new and existing products at profitable, yet competitive, prices
 
You should carefully consider these risks, uncertainties, and other information, disclosures, and discussions that contain cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those provided in the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
 
4
 
PART I

Item 1. Business.
 
Overview of the Company, Products and Target Markets
 
Trulite is an emerging technology company engaged in the development, production, sourcing, marketing and selling of portable, semi-portable and stationary products, components and power generation systems that can generate clean renewable power for use in off-grid applications requiring power up to one kilowatt. These products, components and systems include the integration of hydrogen fuel cells, photovoltaic solar panels, wind micro-turbines, batteries, charge controllers and inverters and can be used in both a prime as well as standby power system in both indoor as well as outdoor applications.

The Company was incorporated in Delaware on July 15, 2004. Later that month, the Company purchased all the membership interests of, and merged with, Trulite Technology, LC (“Trulite Technology”), a Utah limited liability company. Trulite Technology had been formed in May 2002. In October 2003, Trulite Technology was introduced to William Jackson Berger (“John Berger”) of Contango Capital Partners, LP (“CCP”). CCP provided the first round of private funding to the Company in July 2004 and effected the merger between the Company and Trulite Technology.  

In January 2004, Trulite Technology received an initial order for two prototype chemical hydride cartridges which were delivered in March 2004. In July 2004, Trulite Technology delivered four larger chemical hydride cartridges to the Naval Research Laboratory.

In September 2005, the Company introduced its Kitty Hawk system. This product consists of three technologies: one that generates hydrogen gas from dry chemical hydride compounds (the HydroCell, a proprietary hydrogen storage product that is an environmental-friendly alternative developed from the Company’s prototype chemical hydride cartridges that the Company also plans to market as a separate product and with respect to which the Company has filed six patent applications); one that transforms the hydrogen gas into electricity (the fuel cell stack, for which the Company has one filed patent); and one that controls the flow of hydrogen for the actual generation of electricity (the control technology, which is a technology with respect to which the Company has also filed one patent). This original Kitty Hawk system, produced in limited quantities in the first quarter of 2006, was capable of producing 15 net watts of power. During 2006, the Company developed an enhanced version of the Kitty Hawk, the KH-3X, with twice the power output of the initial Kitty Hawk product. The Company used the results of field testing and initial user response of the KH-3X in developing a more powerful and more advanced hybrid power generation product, the KH4. The Company has one patent application for the ability to utilize hybrid power sources.

The KH4 system has the capability to produce 150 watts of continuous power and up to 250 watts of peak power. The integrated advanced technology lithium ion battery can provide immediate power if the unit is being used as a back-up for grid power. The system can manage the integration of power from photovoltaic solar panels and on-site wind micro-turbines together with power from the fuel cell to optimize the power available to meet the needs of the application. The two integral 400 watt-hour fuel cartridges that are standard with the KH4 can provide over seven hours of run time with the unit operating at 60% of capacity. In the proper storage conditions, the fuel cartridges can be stored indefinitely before use. The Company has identified and entered into initial discussions with potential key customers in anticipation of initial product shipments in late 2008. The expected manufacturing, application development costs and capital operating requirement is expected to total $9.1 million during 2008, including capital expenditures of $1.2 million. Funding for product development and manufacturing are expected to come from the issuance of additional equity and debt instruments.

We generated $16,667, $8,333 and $2,883 in revenues from the sale of HydroCells and integrated power generation units and ancillary products in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
 
5
 
Overview of the Renewable Energy Industry
 
There are a number of factors that we believe are creating significant changes in the landscape of the renewable energy industry, which in turn present significant opportunities for renewable portable power generation:
 
 
1.
Users of conventional hydrocarbon energy sources (oil and natural gas) face increasing problems with maintaining supply in the face of growing global demand;

 
2.
Power reliability (that is, the electric power provided to commercial and consumer markets through the electrical grid) is becoming an increasing problem in the United States and other countries due to aging infrastructure, necessitating alternative off-grid power sources for back-up during outages or as primary power sources;

 
3.
The increasing proliferation of electronic devices (for example, cell phones, portable digital movie and music players and personal computers) and their power demands are becoming more challenging for conventional battery technology to keep pace;

 
4.
Increasing global environmental and regulatory issues are making the use of hydrocarbons ever more difficult; and
 
 
5.
Increasing geopolitical issues are causing global security concerns related to the availability and price of oil and natural gas.
 
Due to these pressures, we believe the energy industry will change dramatically before the end of this decade. We believe that both portable and stationary hydrogen fuel cell products can provide practical, cost efficient solutions to certain of the problems presented by the above issues.

Fuel cell and alternative fuel source technology is still being developed and refined. In many applications applied research and technology development remains a vitally important part of the industry. Reliability, cost and safe deployment of this technology will be the key to initial successes.
 
A fuel cell is a non-mechanical device (it is a very thin membrane similar to a computer chip) that converts hydrogen gas (the fuel source) and oxygen into electricity and water. The water is a non-toxic by-product resulting from the process of generating electricity in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell and is eliminated during the electricity conversion process. Each fuel cell (that is, each “chip”) produces a given amount of power when the hydrogen and oxygen are combined (the power output is measured in watts). When several fuel cells are combined or “stacked,” they create a fuel cell stack.
 
Products utilizing fuel cell technology include fuel cell buses, numerous military applications, auxiliary power units, remote power, and other transportation applications. Broad commercialization of fuel cell usage depends on developing a cost effective product or products with unique attributes for certain applications. Products will be commercialized at price points that make sense to both commercial and consumer markets.
 
Portable and semi-portable applications such as in the premium battery markets, where fuel cells improve run time and can be cost-competitive, appear to be leading the early efforts of commercialization. This initial focus should also help demonstrate product performance, reliability and durability. It should also reduce production costs, establish codes and standards for fuel cell technology, build a skilled labor force, develop the nation’s hydrogen infrastructure and create public awareness and acceptance.

There will be winners and losers in the commercialization process as the technology develops, but we believe it is too early to tell which technologies will ultimately dominate in certain applications. However, the future direction of the industry appears clear in some major application areas, such as Proton Exchange Membrane (“PEM”) fuel cell technology, the technology used in our products. A portable fuel cell industry survey by Fuel Cell Today in December 2006 indicated that over 75% of the companies surveyed are focusing their efforts on PEM fuel cells or the closely related Direct Methanol Fuel Cell technologies. The survey also suggests that government actions to address fuel costs, supply risks, and the environment could positively and dramatically impact fuel cell industry prospects in the next two to three years. 
 
6
 
Our Products
 
Trulite plans to produce two primary products: the HydroCell fuel source and the integrated fuel cell power generation system that uses the HydroCells. These core products will be offered as stand alone products but will also be the primary technology behind various hybrid systems that Trulite offers.
 
Our HydroCell is a technology that utilizes a cartridge filled with a chemical hydride (dry sodium borohydride) that, when injected with water, produces hydrogen on demand for portable and stationary power devices. Each cartridge is compact and lightweight. Power-to-weight ratio (the ability to generate the same or more energy by cutting the weight of the generating device) is one factor in gaining market acceptance for clean portable power sources. The key to the HydroCell’s efficient design is that it uses moist air exiting a PEM fuel cell to produce hydrogen for the PEM fuel cell stack. Water recycling not only enables the HydroCell to produce several liters of hydrogen from a lightweight package, but also means that the HydroCell produces hydrogen only when the fuel cell stack is operating. The proprietary control technology used inside the HydroCell and the cartridges make possible the safe production of hydrogen. The internal cartridge components allow the energy-dense chemical hydride to react with the injected water in a controlled manner while providing for an almost complete reactivity of the material.
 
The HydroCell fuel source can be marketed as a separate product and is a metallic cylinder holding the chemical hydride. When water is injected into the cylinder, it creates a chemical reaction which generates hydrogen gas. The hydrogen gas is transformed into electricity via the fuel cell, which then powers the product in which it is installed. The container is sealed to prevent moisture from entering the cylinder and to ensure the chemical hydride does not escape the cylinder. The cylinder is robust and will not break if dropped or otherwise abused, resulting in a reliable and safe product that is easy to manufacture.

We believe the significance of the HydroCell is the proprietary, chemical hydride mixture and chemical reaction process wherein the generation of hydrogen does not occur until water is added to the chemical hydride. Given that the hydride is inert until water is added, a HydroCell cartridge can be kept in storage for a minimum of three years without losing its energy density. In other words, the energy level doesn’t get weaker over time. We believe the HydroCell has the highest energy density of any known portable hydrogen source currently available in the market. Our dry hydride technology for generating hydrogen makes it possible to build HydroCell cartridges capable of generating hydrogen for extended run times.
 
We believe the HydroCell’s design offers the following advantages:
 
 
1.
Safety - Hydrogen is produced only as it is needed, making it a safer product;

 
2.
Reliability - The HydroCell has few moving parts, making it a reliable fuel source;

 
3.
Cost - The HydroCell cartridges are inexpensive compared with the costs associated with generating an equal amount of energy from conventional energy sources because they provide clean energy;

 
4.
Disposability - The HydroCell cartridges are disposable. The by-product is an inert, solid, chemical oxide with minimal health hazard that can be discarded in landfills; and

 
5.
Shelf Life - The HydroCell can lie dormant for an extended period of time without losing its energy density. 
 
7

Our second product is the integrated fuel cell power generation system, consisting of the HydroCell, the fuel cell stack and the Company’s control technology that controls the flow of hydrogen for the actual generation of electricity.
 
The control technology is an integrated, programmable electronic circuit (that is, the circuit can be programmed to perform specific tasks) that is used to control the flow of hydrogen and oxygen to the fuel cell stack and to optimize the process. The purpose of the control technology is to ensure the proper amount of hydrogen is generated to power the device that is attached to the Kitty Hawk product. If too much or too little hydrogen is generated, the efficiency of the Kitty Hawk is significantly reduced resulting in the unit’s inability to adequately power the attached devices. The control system also manages the use of power from all of the energy sources that can be used in this hybrid system including batteries, photovoltaic solar panels, wind micro-turbines, and of course the fuel cell itself.
 
We manufacture the fuel cell stack, and engage in new product development and product enhancements on the fuel cell stack. We first introduced the Kitty Hawk power system in September 2005. The initial Kitty Hawk products could generate hydrogen for up to three hours at full power. The initial product was capable of generating 15 net watts of power and the second generation, the KH-3X, was capable of generating 30 net watts of usable power.

The KH-3X had a number of enhancements: improved physical design; noise reduction; faster start-up cycle (several seconds versus two to three minutes); fuel level gauge to indicate the level of energy remaining in the cartridge; an attached carrying handle; a status display screen indicating the power output of the unit; interior technical modifications to eliminate hose pinching and increased power output to 30 watts of power. Each of these enhancements required several steps including designing and building the enhancement; testing the enhancement to ensure it performs as specified; incorporating and testing the enhancement in the KH-3X unit and testing the KH-3X unit in a customer environment. The designing, building and testing of the enhancements began in March 2006 and were completed by the third quarter of 2006.

The KH4 was introduced in August 2007 and is currently undergoing field testing at strategic customer sites. The product offers 150 watts of continuous power and up to 250 watts of peak power, consumes less internal power, weighs less per watt of power generated and is more rugged than the KH-3X and is quieter. The KH4 also offers remote indication via its integral communication port of fuel consumed, fuel remaining as well as other advanced diagnostic monitoring and control features through its integrated RFID technology. Additionally, the KH4 can produce both AC as well as DC power providing superior flexibility in numerous customer and multiple market applications. We expect first sales of production quantities of the KH4 to commence in the fourth quarter of 2008, contingent on securing funding for manufacturing and application development.
 
Market Focus
 
We believe that the Company’s off-grid products have application in several markets where electrical power is needed, including; (i) recharging UPS battery back-up systems for computers where extended run times may be needed to provide unlimited runtime capabilities, (ii) telecommunications, such as back-up power for repeater stations, (iii) recharging batteries used in power tools on construction sites, (iv) emergency situations where grid power is not available (v) in the home or small business to power lights and small refrigerators and to power or recharge electronics, (vi) remote monitoring for security, industrial and other applications, (vii) recreational activities where grid power is not readily available such as camping, boating, fishing and hunting, (viii) off-grid power for remote displays and for traffic control applications, (ix) other applications where clean indoor power generation or portability are important, (x) portable back-up power for batteries in cars, trucks, boats and RV’s, and (xi) power for portable and mobile medical devices.
 
We are in the process of producing and delivering approximately 30 KH4 units that are being sold to customers for field testing. Based on the feedback from those tests, the product will be modified if appropriate for certain applications. Limited production of finished product for shipment into the marketplace is planned for Q3 of 2008. Processes will be established and documented and the first level of automation will be introduced. By Q2 of 2009, the KH4 will be in full production resulting in further reductions in the cost of this product.
 
8
 
Trulite believes that the Company is in a unique position to succeed in the marketplace primarily because:

·
Trulite’s management team and Board of Directors have substantial experience in electrical and portable power generation, in operating and growing businesses and in key disciplines such as manufacturing/supply chain management and marketing.

·
Trulite plans to provide integrated power generation solutions for off-grid markets (which include back-up power) for requirements up to one kilowatt.

·
Trulite offers hybrid products that can both generate and store power. Trulite incorporates advanced technology batteries into its solutions. This hybrid solution enables Trulite to provide instant-on back-up power, continuous power even with intermittent loads (such as refrigerators), continuous power even with intermittent power generation (such as solar or wind), and capacity for peak loads.

·
By using dry sodium borohydride in the KH4, Trulite’s fuel source is more stable, less costly and able to produce more power per pound than other fuel technologies.

·
Trulite has a more robust integration and control technology incorporated into its products that provides for the direct integration of the solar and wind power sources.

·
Trulite plans to have its products available for shipment to the market in 2008.

The applications we are targeting initially can be categorized into three market groups:

Back-up Power: With the increased frequency and duration of power outages experienced on the grid due to peak demands exceeding capacity, to many parts of the grid wearing out, and to weather and other natural disasters, businesses and homes have increased demands for back-up power to provide for the continued operation of critical electrical devices, appliances, lights and other equipment. While batteries have played and will continue to play a large role in this back-up power, the market has increased interest in finding solutions that will provide extended run time and reliability. Trulite’s KH4 portable power generator provides an excellent solution for many of these requirements since it can be safely used indoors or outdoors and can be located wherever the power is needed. The KH4 is expected to be used primarily to recharge batteries in these applications but can also provide the primary power for many devices if necessary during a power outage. For example, the KH4 has sufficient power to recharge several cell phones or other communications devices at the same time. It can provide the power to repeater stations that are associated with towers for cell phones and satellite data transmission. It can power many medical devices that must continue to function when grid power is not available. The KH4 can recharge the uninterrupted power supply (“UPS”) battery devices used to power desktop computers or small servers when the power fails, and it can recharge the batteries in laptop computers and run laptops indefinitely. In combination with a battery that would be used to handle the peak electrical demand on the cyclical start-up, the KH4 could also power a typical household refrigerator or freezer for an extended period of time. Companies with applications in the telecommunications, satellite data transmission, UPS, and first responder markets have expressed interest in the KH4 power generator and in the higher output clean generators that Trulite plans to develop.
 
9
 
Off-Grid Power: Gasoline or diesel generators and/or batteries are the primary sources for power in applications that cannot conveniently be connected to the grid. Generators are typically cumbersome, noisy, environmentally unfriendly, maintenance intensive and potentially dangerous due to the associated carbon monoxide. Generators must be refueled continuously. The Trulite power generation system is quieter, requires little maintenance and does not generate any harmful or environmentally unfriendly byproducts (heat and water, which is re-used in the Trulite process, are the only byproducts). The HydroCell fuel canisters can be stored indefinitely before use and are much more convenient and easy to use than containers of gasoline. As a result, companies with applications in off-grid shelters, battery charging for uses such as portable hand tools and communication devices in the field, video cameras, recreational vehicles, trucks, sports vehicles, boating and other recreational activities have expressed interest in the KH4 product. The KH4 clean power generators can also provide a product line extension in generator markets to fill niche applications that cannot be properly served with current generator products.

Remote Monitoring: Many applications require powering electrical devices with relatively low power requirements to monitor activities in disperse locations. These requirements range from the monitoring equipment found on oil and gas wells or on pipelines to security cameras used in a variety of locations. These applications are frequently powered by photovoltaic solar panel and battery systems today. However, if the solar panels do not get sufficient power due to rain or cloudy conditions for an extended period of time, then the battery cannot be recharged and someone has to be dispatched to the remote location to charge or replace the battery. If a Trulite power generator is included in a hybrid system, then the fuel cell can be automatically activated when sufficient solar power is not available to recharge the battery and to keep the system operating. Solar panels are also subject to a variety of abuses, from vandalism to roaming animals knocking down the panels, rendering them inoperative. The repair and maintenance of these facilities is time consuming and costly, especially in remote environments. The impact of the lack of monitoring data may result in significant loss of revenue and potentially may create an operational hazard. Companies and government agencies with remote monitoring applications have expressed interest in the KH4 product, which provides sufficient power for many of their current applications.
  
Continuous Technology and Product Innovation
 
We are committed to continuous technology and product innovation as a means of achieving and maintaining sustainable competitive advantages. Our research and product development group in Utah is narrowly focused on new technology innovation. The group’s responsibility is to create a portfolio of emerging technologies specific to the hydrogen generation and fuel cell space. The senior management team reviews the portfolio and those projects which have the highest likelihood of commercialization will be selected for the research agenda. Quarterly milestones, as well as performance and test metrics, are established to determine the viability of commercialization of the technology. If the test criteria are met, the technology is then further developed and optimized for manufacturing. Our goal is to continuously enhance our existing product lines and leverage our market and product knowledge into new products.

The KH4 product and the related HydroCells will be transferred to manufacturing operation in 2008. The manufacturing team will continue the design for manufacturing of the product. They will establish appropriate manufacturing and quality control procedures. As part of the process to reduce the cost of the product, the manufacturing team will also design and implement automation where justified. The product cost for the initial products will be high since it takes time to source the automation equipment and the high capacity tooling for many of the components. Also, it will be necessary to start the manufacturing process to fully identify the potential automation applications in some instances. Most of the automation and high capacity tooling are expected to be in place in 2009.

Utilize Strategic Relationships
 
Strategic relationships are critical to us for research, product development and volume manufacturing. As used in this context, these relationships are agreements with companies to perform specific activities on our behalf for which we do not have or may not want to develop the competencies to accomplish. In return, we will offer activities or provide competencies that are not available to the counterparties. It is expected that these relationships will be dissolvable at any time and may be formed for the objective of entering a market or developing a technology. We expect to seek out relationships with companies for product design and product development. As we enter into higher volume production, we intend to seek out strategic relationships for manufacturing, distribution and logistics. 
 
10

We currently do not intend to actively pursue markets other than as set forth herein. However, if opportunities arise through strategic relationships with companies specializing in non-competitive markets, we expect to carefully evaluate such opportunities before making a final determination.
 
Strong Corporate Culture
 
We believe a strong corporate culture is the foundation for a successful, enduring enterprise. There are two principles which have been imbedded in the culture of the Company since its inception:
 
 
1.
Integrity above reproach: All members of our team and strategic partners are committed to conducting business in an ethical manner with our customers, suppliers, partners, employees, and the communities in which we operate. There is zero tolerance for behavior at any level that does not adhere to this principle.

 
2.
Frugality: We and our strategic partners are committed to the prudent allocation of resources. In every aspect of normal business activities, resource allocations are carefully weighed before making a decision. Alternatives are thoroughly discussed to determine if there is a better, more efficient option. We intend to make investments in technology and people in order to retain and enhance our competitive position and create fair returns for our stockholders.
 
Intellectual Property
 
We have filed nine patent applications for the HydroCells, the control system and the fuel cells. We make every effort to protect our knowledge of our processes and procedures.
 
Competition
 
We believe that the HydroCell technology is unique and offers significant advantages over hydrogen generation technology offered by our competitors. The HydroCell is a lightweight, compact fuel cell system that, to the Company’s knowledge, when combined with water recycling, produces more hydrogen for its size and weight than any other hydrogen source currently available on the market.
 
We believe our HydroCell and the integrated power system products have created a business model that gives us a competitive advantage. We also believe that the use of the dry sodium borohydride fuel source provides a competitive advantage due to the extended shelf life and convenience of these fuel canisters. We believe our business model affords us the opportunity to sell the integrated power system products in line with the price point of other fuel cell products that we believe are under development.
 
Employees
 
We currently have 18 full-time employees, all of whom are involved in research and development. The Company’s Chief Financial Officer works for Trulite on a part time basis with the associated costs allocated to the Company by Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC (“SREG”). The Company also hires temporary employees from time to time as needed.

11
 
Item 1A. Risk Factors 

There are numerous and varied risks, known and unknown, that may prevent us from achieving our goals, including those described below. The risks described below are not the only ones we will face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our financial performance and business operations. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, or results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
 
Our business is difficult to evaluate because we are a development stage company.
 
The Company is a development stage company that was formed in July 2004, to further the research and development of fuel source and fuel cell systems. To date, we have manufactured 50 KH-3X units and 19 prototype and beta KH4 units. Accordingly, there is only a limited basis upon which to evaluate our business and prospects. An investor in our Company should consider the challenges, expenses, and difficulties we will face as a development stage company seeking to develop and manufacture a new product in a relatively new market.
 
Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
 
We received an audit report for the year ended December 31, 2007, from our independent registered accounting firm containing an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has no significant operating history as of December 31, 2007, and since inception, the Company has not had significant revenues. Management raised additional equity and debt financing to fund operations and to provide additional working capital. However, there is no assurance that such financing will be in amounts sufficient to meet the Company’s needs. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
 
We cannot guarantee that we will not again be required to restate our financial statements.
 
Since our inception, we have restated our financial statements on more than one occasion to correct errors in our financial statements. For example, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A filed with the Commission on December 22, 2006, restated our financial statements at and for the period ended June 30, 2006, to make a correction to the valuation of our common stock for the purposes of accounting for stock-based compensation. We believe that we have developed processes and procedures that will ensure that our financial statements, including the financial statements contained in this Form 10-K, accurately reflect our financial position and results of operations. However, we cannot guarantee that in the future we will not again be required to restate our financial statements.

We have a need for additional capital as we continue to execute our business plan.
 
To achieve and maintain competitiveness and continue our growth, we need to raise approximately $10.0 – $15.0 million to develop, promote, and distribute our products. These funds will be required for capital expenditures to build out the product line, hiring additional technical staff, for purchasing materials for the manufacture of KH4 units, for labor costs associated with manufacturing, marketing expenses and other operating costs and for product development and enhancements to the entire product line.
 
The Company may make appropriate filings to cease to be a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
The Company may, if management determines in connection with future financings or otherwise that it is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders, make appropriate filings to cease to be a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. If the Company chooses to do so, its stockholders no longer will have access to current information regarding the Company contained in periodic reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, the Company's Common Stock would no longer be eligible for trading on the OTCBB which would adversely affect the liquidity for the Common Stock.
 
12

Technological changes could force us to drastically alter our business plan.
 
The quest for alternate energy sources is being undertaken by numerous governments, corporations, universities and other institutions and individuals throughout the world. Many of these participants have far greater experience and resources than the Company and have been engaged in these activities for a longer period of time. In the event that commercially ready applications for alternative energy sources similar in nature to ours are introduced into the marketplace, we may be forced to alter our business plan. This can be expected to be costly and cause substantial delays in, or prevent us entirely from, realizing our objectives.
 
The Company must demonstrate value and reliability in order to gain consumer acceptance.
 
The cost of our fuel cell system is more than that of existing and competing energy providers. If we are unable to reduce our manufacturing and materials costs to produce products that are more cost-effective and reliable than those of our competitors, consumers may be unlikely to purchase our products. The price of our fuel cell system depends, in large part, on material and manufacturing costs. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to lower these costs without affecting the reliability and performance of our product.
 
The Company has limited experience manufacturing or selling fuel cells and fuel cell systems.
 
The Company has limited experience in producing, marketing, and selling any products or services on a commercial basis. To date, we have focused primarily on research and development and have only limited experience manufacturing fuel cells or fuel source systems on a large-volume, commercial basis. We believe that in order to make our products profitable we would have to produce our products through a high-volume automated process. We do not know whether or when we would be able to develop efficient, automated, low-cost manufacturing capabilities. Even if we are successful in developing such capabilities, we cannot ensure that we will do so in time to meet our product commercialization schedule or to satisfy the requirements of our customers, and stockholders.
 
We expect that some of our fuel source products will only be commercially viable as a component of other companies’ products, and these companies may choose not to include our fuel source system in their products.
 
Certain of our fuel source products must be integrated into products manufactured by original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”). We cannot guarantee that OEMs will manufacture these products. If they manufacture such products, no assurances can be given as to whether they will choose to incorporate our products or that such integration will be on financial and other business terms acceptable or profitable to us. In addition, any integration, design, marketing, manufacturing or other problems encountered by an OEM could adversely affect the market for our products and we would have no ability to control the response to such problems.
 
We will need to rely on third parties for the proper execution of our business strategy.
 
Strategic relationships are critical to us for research, product development, and volume manufacturing. We will seek out strategic relationships for product design and development. As the Company enters into higher volume production, we will seek out strategic relationships for manufacturing, distribution and logistics.
 
Outsourcing is expected to happen in phases. First, we will work with raw material and individual component manufacturing. We will control all the development, manufacturing, and quality internally for the initial small-volume ramp-up. Thereafter, outsourcing relationships are expected to be established.
 
13
  
We do not believe we should have difficulty obtaining contractors for any of this work or to supplement or replace existing contractors if any of those relationships were to be insufficient or terminate, or if the sales volume were such that we needed additional contractors to support the increases in sales volume. No assurance can be given that a suitable contractor can be found or that once found, it will consistently meet the Company’s demands with regard to timing or quality. It is possible, however, that difficulties in supplementing or replacing current contractors could develop in the future because of factors that we cannot predict at this time, creating a potential material adverse effect on the Company. The availability of raw materials may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations. Because we use only the highest quality components, any restriction on the availability or use of such raw materials, whether as the result of a reduction in supply, natural disaster, or environmental restrictions, could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.
  
We may be unable to raise additional capital to pursue our commercialization strategy.
 
Our product development and commercialization schedule may be delayed if we are unable to properly fund the Company and execute our business plan. We do not know whether we will be able to secure additional funding or funding on terms that are acceptable to us. If additional capital is raised through the issuance of stock, stockholders’ ownership interest may be diluted.
 
One of the factors that generally affects the market price of publicly traded equity securities is the number of shares outstanding in relationship to assets, net worth, earnings or anticipated earnings. If a public market develops for the Company’s shares, or if the Company determines to register for sale to the public those shares of Common Stock granted in any business combination or issued in any capital-raising activity, a material amount of dilution can be expected to cause the market price of our Common Stock to decline. Furthermore, the public perception of future dilution can have the same effect even if the actual dilution does not occur.
 
In order for us to obtain additional capital, we may find it necessary to issue securities conveying rights senior to those of the holders of the Company’s common stock. Those rights may include voting rights, liquidation preferences and conversion rights. To the extent we convey senior rights; the value of the Company’s common stock can be expected to decline.
 
If we incur indebtedness, we may become too highly leveraged and would be in risk of default.
 
There is no contractual or regulatory limit to the amount of debt we can take on, although we intend to follow a conservative debt policy. If our policy were to change or be eliminated due to unforeseen circumstances, we could become more highly leveraged, which could adversely affect our ability to meet our obligations, and we would then be in risk of default, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, business prospects and long term future viability.
 
A large-scale consumer market for our products may never develop or take longer to develop than we anticipate.
 
A large-scale consumer market for our products may never develop or may develop more slowly than we anticipate. Fuel cell technology is an emerging market, and we are unsure whether there will ever be popular demand for such products. The development of a large-scale market may be affected by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:
 
1.
the competitive cost of fuel cell systems

2.
the emergence of newer and more competitive technology

3.
the future cost of raw materials

4.
regulatory requirements

5.
consumer perceptions regarding the safety of our product

14

6.
consumer reluctance to try new products and technologies
 
If a large-scale consumer market fails to develop or develops more slowly than we anticipate, we may be unable to recover losses incurred in the development of our products.
 
Changes in environmental policies could hurt the market for our products and deter potential investors.
 
Although many governments have made the development of alternative energy sources, fuel cells in particular, a priority, we cannot assure you that these governments will not change their environmental policies or that any change would not negatively affect our business. Research for alternative energy is influenced by governmental regulations and policies concerning energy research or conservation. Depending on the nature of the governmental regulations, it could be easier and more cost efficient, or more difficult and costly, to raise funds and conduct research or to manufacture, market or sell our products in a given country. Governmental regulations may also impose more stringent requirements for the transport of the hydrogen fuel source, thereby increasing the costs of distribution. 

Changes in governmental regulation could hurt the market for our products and negatively affect our ability to attract potential consumers.
 
The energy industry is influenced by state and federal regulations and policies. Any change in the present policies could affect additional investment in alternative forms of energy and decrease demand for our products.
 
Fuel cell technology may be subject to future governmental regulation, which could affect the market for our product. As our products are introduced to the market, we may be subject to additional laws and regulations. We do not know the extent to which this will affect our ability to distribute our products. In addition, any future regulation may increase our production costs and the cost of our final product.
 
We currently face and will continue to face significant competition.
 
Our products, the HydroCell hydrogen generation system and the Kitty Hawk integrated power systems, are expected to face significant competition. Many companies with substantially greater resources are developing similar hydride hydrogen generation technologies and are enhancing their fuel cell technologies. We cannot be sure that customers will use our products in lieu of competitor’s product offerings in the target markets we have identified. Further, the development of new technology may affect the popularity and profitability of our products or render our products obsolete.
 
We depend on our intellectual property, and our failure to protect that technology could adversely affect our future success.
 
We rely in part on our nine patent applications to protect our intellectual property. Additionally, we make every effort to protect our knowledge of our processes and procedures. Failure to protect our existing intellectual property could cause the loss of our exclusivity or the right to use the technology we developed. If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property rights, we may have to pay others for the right to use their technology.
 
We could face litigation regarding the legitimacy of our patents, if and when issued, and we cannot ensure that we will be successful in such suits. These suits may result in the invalidation of our patent rights or the licensing of these rights to others. 

We protect our proprietary intellectual property, including intellectual property that may not be patented, through the use of confidentiality agreements. We cannot assure you that these agreements will not be breached or that we will have an adequate remedy in the event that they are breached.
 
15

The Company may be unable to attract or retain key personnel, which would adversely affect our operations.
 
Our team consists of several scientists and we also employ engineers and researchers to help develop our products. Our future success depends on our ability to attract and retain a highly skilled workforce, consisting of scientists, engineers, researchers and marketing professionals. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and retain such personnel. Our inability to do so could negatively impact our success.
 
Authorization of Preferred Stock
 
Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 1,500,000 shares of preferred stock with designations, rights and preferences determined from time to time by our Board of Directors. Accordingly, our Board of Directors is empowered to issue, without stockholder approval, preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights which could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of the Common Stock. As of March 31, 2008, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding. If shares of preferred stock are issued, such shares could affect the rights of holders of our Common stock.
 
Penny Stock Regulations may impose certain restrictions on marketability of the Company’s securities.
 
The trading of the Company’s Common Stock is subject to rules pertaining to “penny stocks.” The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has adopted regulations which generally define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) of less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. As a result, the Company’s Common Stock is subject to rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established clients and “accredited investors.” For transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of such securities and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require the delivery, prior to the transaction, of a risk disclosure document mandated by the SEC relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also disclose the commission payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer’s presumed control over the market. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. Consequently, the “penny stock” rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell shares of the Company’s Common Stock and may affect the ability of investors to sell such shares of Common Stock in the secondary market and the price at which such investors can sell any of such shares. 
 
Investors should be aware that, according to the SEC, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include:

1.
control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer

2.
manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases

3.
“boiler room” practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons

4.
excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers

16

5.
the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses

The Company’s management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

     None.

Item 2. Property.

The Company leases space in Bluffdale, Utah. The facility serves as the Company’s research, product development and manufacturing center. The facility encompasses approximately 5,500 square feet rented by the Company at a monthly rate of $3,000 as of December 31, 2007. Lease expense in 2007 totaled $32,848. The lease expires May 31, 2008.
 
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

   The Company is not party to any legal proceedings nor is it aware of any investigation, claim or demand made on the Company that may reasonably result in any legal proceedings.
 
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.
 
PART II
 
Item 5. Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

The Company is authorized by its Certificate of Incorporation, which was amended on May 4, 2007, to issue an aggregate of 51,500,000 shares of capital stock, comprising of 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per share (the "Common Stock") and 1,500,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”). As of March 31, 2008, 21,201,270 shares of Common Stock and no shares of Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.

As of March 10, 2008, there were 40 record holders of 21,201,270 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

The Company’s Common Stock is listed under the symbol TRUL on the NASDAQ over-the-counter bulletin board.

17

The following table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the high and low closing sale prices as reported on NASDAQ.
 
 
  
2007
  
 
  
High
  
Low
  
First Quarter Ending March 31
    
N/A
    
N/A
  
Second Quarter Ending June 30
  
$
1.25
  
$
1.00
  
Third Quarter Ending September 30
  
$
.90
  
$
.41
  
Fourth Quarter Ending December 31 
  
$
.86
  
$
.40
  

The Company has paid no dividends on its Common Stock.

On April 13, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the payment of dividends equal to an aggregate of $113,138, to be paid in the form of Common Stock to all of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock. This dividend had accrued from July 22, 2004 to March 31, 2006. On May 5, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an additional dividend, which had accrued from April 1, 2006 to May 2, 2006, but had not been paid, to be paid in the form of Common Stock to all the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have since converted their preferred shares to shares of Common Stock and no more dividends shall be declared and paid on those shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

     Information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement (“Proxy Statement”) for its 2008 annual meeting of stockholders.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Not applicable.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, with their explanatory notes included as part of this Form 10-K.

Overview and Plan of Operation

Trulite is engaged in the development, production, sourcing, marketing and selling of portable, semi-portable and stationary products, components and systems that can generate power for use in off-grid applications requiring power up to one kilowatt. These products, components and systems include hydrogen fuel cells, photovoltaic solar panels, wind micro-turbines, batteries, charge controllers and inverters. Solar panels and on-site wind micro-turbines provide intermittent power that frequently must be stored to meet requirements when the panels are not producing. The Trulite fuel cells can provide power when the solar panels or wind turbines are not operating for extended and consistent power availability.

The Company announced the development of its new KH4 product in 2007. This hydrogen fuel cell generator can produce 150 watts of continuous power and up to 250 watts of peak power. The integrated advanced technology lithium ion battery can provide immediate power if the fuel cell is being used as a back-up for grid power. The system can manage the integration of power from solar panels and on-site wind micro-turbines together with power from the fuel cell to optimize the power available to meet the needs of the application. The KH4 uses dry sodium borohydride as the hydrogen source. The two 400 watt-hour fuel cartridges that are standard with the KH4 can provide over seven hours of run time with the unit operating at 60% of capacity. In the proper storage conditions, the fuel cartridges can be stored indefinitely before use. The Company has nine patents pending for the technology involved in the KH4 and other products.
 
18

Trulite has recently expanded its product offering to include smaller photovoltaic solar power systems and small on-site wind micro-turbines power systems. These products will be offered in the marketplace prior to the new KH4 product being available in production quantities but will be able to work in conjunction with the KH4.

Trulite believes that its off-grid products have application in several markets where electrical power is needed. The products can be used to recharge batteries such as those used in power tools on construction sites. Power can be provided in emergency situations where grid power is not available in the home or small business to recharge batteries, to power lights and small refrigerators and to power or recharge electronics. Power can also be provided for remote monitoring and electronics for security, industrial, telecommunications, and other applications. The products can also be used for recreational activities where grid power is not readily available such as camping, boating, fishing and hunting. Off-grid power is also useful for remote displays and for traffic control applications. The Trulite products can also be used to recharge uninterruptible power supply (“UPS”) battery back-up systems for computers where extended run times may be needed. Portable back-up power for batteries in cars, trucks, boats and RV’s also provides market opportunities.
 
The Company is a development stage company and, as such, has not had any meaningful revenues and has accumulated a deficit since it’s inception on July 15, 2004. From July 15, 2004 through December 31, 2004, the Company had $1,750 in sales. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, the Company had revenue of $16,667, $8,333, and $2,883, respectively. We expect increasing commercial sales during 2008, contingent on securing funding for manufacturing and application development. Research and development expenditures will be made to further enhance the performance of the hydrogen fuel sources, to develop the electronics that control the process to generate electricity, to improve the performance of the fuel cells and other components, to increase the electrical output of the products and to test the performance and reliability of the products. Since our inception, we have spent $4,295,722 million in research and development and anticipate that we will spend at least $9.1 million in 2008 for manufacturing and application development costs and operating capital requirements. We will have ongoing research and development expenditures for the foreseeable future as products are developed for new applications and markets. The timing, amount and success of the research and development and manufacturing estimates are dependent on a number of factors that are difficult to project, including but not limited to the availability of qualified people, the success of the technologies under development, the cost to implement technologies, the cost of the product, the requirements of the marketplace, regulatory requirements, the availability of funds, and other factors.

We do not currently have sufficient capital to fully execute our business plan and we need to raise additional capital to develop, promote, and distribute our product. Historically, our activities have been funded through a combination of common and preferred stock issuances and loans from existing investors. Our current financial plans require us to secure approximately $10.0 - $15.0 million in 2008. Additional funding may not be available under favorable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to curtail operations significantly or to obtain funds on terms not as favorable as we would hope.

19
 

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
 
   
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
  
   
2007
  
2006
  
           
Sales
  
$
2,883
  
$
8,333
  
               
Cost of sales
    
2,674
   
5,912
 
               
GROSS PROFIT
    
209
   
2,421
 
               
Operating expenses:
              
               
Research and development
    
1,928,582
   
1,216,616
 
Depreciation
    
26,097
   
14,848
 
General and administrative
    
2,338,642
   
2,190,319
 
               
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
    
4,293,321
   
3,421,783
 
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
    
(4,293,112
)
  
(3,419,362
)
               
Other income (expense):
              
Interest expense
    
(436,708
)
  
(29,726
)
Interest income
    
4,499
   
5,794
 
               
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
    
(432,209
)
  
(23,932
)
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    
(4,725,321
)
  
(3,443,294
)
               
Income taxes
    
-
   
-
 
               
NET LOSS
  
$
(4,725,321
)
$
(3,443,294
)
 
Revenues
 
For the year ended December 31, 2007, revenues totaled $2,833 versus $8,333 for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
Gross profit
 
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, gross profit was $209 compared to $2,421 for 2006.
 
Operating expenses
 
Operating expenses were $4,293,321 for the year ended December 31, 2007. This compares to operating expenses of $3,421,783 for 2006. Research and development expenses increased to $1,928,582 for 2007, compared to $1,216,616 for 2006. The increase in research and development during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2007 was due to a scale up of research and development of the KH4 150-watt power system. Depreciation expense increased $11,249 during 2007. General and administrative expense during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2007 increased $148,323. This increase is a result of an increase of $489,519 in management and administrative services, a non-cash charge of $177,147, which was recognized due to the modification of the conversion feature of the June 2007 Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement, an increase of $188,531 in sales and marketing expense, an increase of insurance cost of $28,231, an increase in website expense and other administrative expenses of $30,247, offset by a decrease in professional fees of $477,713 and a decrease of stock based compensation of $287,639.
 
20
 
Non-cash charges of $494,143 were recognized in general and administrative expenses in 2007, which consisted of stock based compensation of $223,518, issuance of common stock and warrants for consulting services of $93,478, and a charge of $177,147 recognized due to the modification of the conversion feature of the June Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement.
 
Non cash charges of $958,312 were recognized in general and administrative expenses in 2006, which consisted of stock based compensation of $511,157 and $447,155 recognized through the issuance of common stock and warrants for consulting services.

Other Income (Expense)
 
For the year ended December 31, 2007, other income (expense) was a loss of $432,209, as compared to a loss of $23,932 for 2006, primarily as a result of higher interest expense on outstanding borrowings.
 
Deemed dividend on warrant modification

On February 22, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors agreed to extend the term of warrants, until April 13, 2008, that were issued on April 13, 2006 in connection with the issuance of common stock for cash consideration of $1.00 per share. These warrants entitle the holders to purchase an additional 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an original exercise price of $1.50 per common share (amended to $0.50 per share on November 19, 2007), that were originally set to expire on April 13, 2007. A difference of $104,881 in the fair value of these warrants after modification, when compared to their fair value immediately prior to the modification, was recorded as a deemed dividend in the first quarter of 2007.

On November 19, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the amendment of all warrants to purchase the common stock of the Company to reflect an exercise price of $0.50 per share. A difference of $234,197 in the fair value of these warrants after modification, when compared to their fair value immediately prior to the modification, was recorded as a deemed dividend in the fourth quarter of 2007.
 
Preferred dividends and deemed dividend on conversion of preferred stock to common stock

In May 2006, all of our 8% Cumulative Convertible Series A Preferred Stock was converted into common stock.
 
The 8% Cumulative Convertible Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) had a liquidation value of $1.00 per share plus dividends whether or not earned or declared from the issuance date thereof at the annual rate of eight percent (8%) (the “Preferred Dividends”) of $1.00 per share (the “Original Issue Price”), payable at our option in cash or in shares of Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, the Preferred Stock had preferential treatment in liquidation to all common stock and any other stock of the Company ranking junior to the Series A Preferred Stock. Accretion of cumulative dividends outstanding on these shares was $39,275 and $84,074 for the twelve months ended December 31 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock was convertible at any time into common shares by dividing the original issue price by a conversion price as defined. The Series A Preferred Stock was redeemable at the option of the majority holders in cash at $1.00 per share plus all accrued and unpaid Preferred Dividends on the fifth anniversary of the date of initial issuance or other events relating to change in 25% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the Company or a merger or consolidation as defined. Each holder of Series A Preferred Stock was entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of Common Stock into which the shares of Series A Preferred Stock was convertible.
 
21
 
On May 2, 2006, 1,454,725 shares of Series A Preferred Stock were converted into 6,562,630 shares of common stock. In addition, the cumulative accreted dividends of $129,973 were converted into 291,361 shares of common stock. Upon the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, we recorded a non-cash charge of $1,424,762 to reflect the deemed dividend on conversion in accordance with EITF Topic D-42, “The Effect on the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock.” In addition, we recorded a non-cash charge of $161,388 to reflect the deemed dividend on conversion of accreted dividends. The total of the two “deemed dividends” was $1,586,150. The amount of charge is equal to the difference in the value at the time of exchange of the shares of common stock exchanged for the preferred stock minus the value of the shares that the holders of the preferred stock otherwise would have had the right to receive upon conversion of the preferred stock. The charge did not affect our reported revenue, operating income, net loss, assets, liabilities or stockholders’ (deficit) equity.

Historical Sources of Cash
 
During the period from July 15, 2004 (inception) though December 31, 2004, the Company financed its operations principally through the sale of an aggregate of $300,000 of Series A Preferred Stock. The Company, for the year ended December 31, 2005, financed its operations through the sale of an aggregate of $950,000 of Series A Preferred Stock, along with sale of three Kitty Hawk units. The Company conducted a private placement in April 2006, raising $1,000,000 through the sale of 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock and warrants. In addition, during 2006, the Company borrowed $1,250,000 pursuant to promissory notes with related parties. The Company for the year ended December 31, 2007, financed its operations through the issuance of common stock and warrants and the exercise of stock options for $1,426,188. In addition, the Company borrowed $2,284,400 through a combination of promissory notes with related parties and third party financing.
 
Cash position, sources and uses of cash, and debt conversion in 2007
 
Our cash position at December 31, 2007, was $374,134 as compared to $275,957 at December 31, 2006.
 
Our operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2007, used cash in the amount of $3,560,951, as compared to $2,178,136 used in 2006. Cash used in operating activities for 2007 and 2006, reflected a net loss of $4,725,321 and $3,443,294, respectively, both partially offset by adding back the non-cash charges associated with depreciation, common stock and warrants issued for consulting and management services and stock-based compensation, a non cash charge related to the conversion of notes payable in 2007, and a significant increase in amount due to affiliates during 2007.
 
The Company used $51,460 and $31,889 in investing activities for the purchase of property and equipment, as well as patent application fees, for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
 
The Company had cash inflows from financing activities in 2007 of $1,426,188 from the issuance of common stock and warrants, and exercise of common stock options. On November 26, 2007, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with SREG. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold a total of 2,400,000 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.0001 par value to SREG for total proceeds of $1,200,000, or $0.50 per share. The Company had $2,284,400 from the issuances of promissory notes during 2007. During 2007, $289,500 due to SREG for accrued interest and management and administrative services provided by SREG was re-characterized as part of the promissory note dated August 20, 2007. The Company had cash inflows from financing activities in 2006 of $1,000,000 from the issuance of common stock and warrants and $1,250,000 from the issuance of promissory notes.

On April 14, 2006, the Company raised additional equity of $1,000,000 through the issuance of common stock for cash consideration of $1.00 per share. These issuances of common stock also included one year warrants to purchase an additional 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.50 per common share (amended to $0.50 per share on November 19, 2007) that expire on April 13, 2007. The value of the warrants was included as additional paid in capital. 
 
22
 
The Company incurred indebtedness from Contango Venture Capital Corporation (“CVCC”) through issuance of promissory notes as follows:

Issue date
  
Maturity
  
Principal
  
Interest rate
  
August 9, 2006
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
125,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
November 22, 2006
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
400,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
February 6, 2007
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
240,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
May 30, 2007
   February 19, 2008  
$
240,000
   11.25%
 
August 20, 2007
   May 16, 2008  
$
250,000
   12.25%
 

On November 26, 2007, the Company and CVCC, entered into a Third Amendment to Subscription Agreement (the “CVCC Amended Subscription Agreement”) whereby, in consideration of cancellation of the entire principal balance of, and accrued but unpaid interest on, the promissory notes dated August 9, 2006, November 22, 2006 and February 6, 2007, made by the Company in favor of CVCC (the “CVCC Notes”), the $844,628 outstanding under the CVCC Notes, which included $79,628 of accrued and unpaid interest, was converted into 1,260,639 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock.

On November 26, 2007, the Company and CVCC entered into a Subscription Agreement (the “November 2007 CVCC Subscription Agreement”), whereby, in consideration of cancellation of the entire principal balance of, and accrued but unpaid interest on, the promissory notes dated May 30, 2007 and August 20, 2007, made by the Company in favor of CVCC (the “CVCC New Notes”), the $511,912 outstanding under the CVCC New Notes, which included $21,912 of accrued and unpaid interest, was converted into 764,048 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock.

The CVCC Amended Subscription Agreement and the November 2007 CVCC Subscription Agreement are substantive conversion options in accordance with the Emerging Issue Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 06-06, “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification (or Exchange) of Convertible Debt Instruments” (“Issue No. 06-06”) and in accordance with EITF Issue No. 96-19, “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments” (“Issue No. 96-19”), were accounted for as an extinguishment of debt. Management of CVCC allowed for the conversion of CVCC Notes and CVCC New Notes at a stock price of $0.67 per share, which was greater than the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock $0.50 per share on the date of conversion. An additional 688,393 shares of common stock, at an estimated fair value of $344,197, which would have been issued to CVCC if the CVCC Notes and CVCC New Notes were converted at the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock, was credited to additional paid-in capital.

As of December 31, 2007, CVCC owned approximately 19% of the Company’s common stock.

The Company had incurred indebtedness from Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC and a wholly owned subsidiary (“SREG”) through issuance of promissory notes as follows:

Issue date
  
Maturity
  
Principal
  
Interest rate
  
August 9, 2006
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
125,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
September 21, 2006
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
250,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
October 26, 2006
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
250,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
November 28, 2006
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
100,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
February 6, 2007
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
360,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
May 31, 2007
   February 19, 2008  
$
360,000
   11.25%
 
August 20, 2007
   May 16, 2008  
$
375,000
   12.25%
 
 
23
 
On November 26, 2007, the Company and SREG entered into a Third Amendment to Subscription Agreement (the “SREG Amended Subscription Agreement”) whereby, in consideration of cancellation of the entire principal balance of, and accrued but unpaid interest on, the promissory notes dated August 9, 2006, September 21, 2006, October 26, 2006, November 28, 2006 and February 6, 2007, made by the Company in favor of SREG (the “SREG Notes”), the $1,130,524 outstanding under the SREG Notes, which included $45,524 of accrued and unpaid interest, was converted into 2,261,048 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock.

On November 26, 2007, the Company and SREG entered into a Subscription Agreement (the “November 2007 SREG Subscription Agreement”), whereby, in consideration of cancellation of the entire principal balance of, and accrued but unpaid interest on, the promissory notes dated May 31, 2007 and August 20, 2007, made by the Company in favor of SREG (the “SREG New Notes”), the $758,530 outstanding under the SREG New Notes, which included $23,530 of accrued and unpaid interest, was converted into 1,517,060 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock.

The SREG Amended Subscription Agreement and the November 2007 SREG Subscription Agreement are substantive conversion options in accordance with EITF Issue No. 06-06, “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification (or Exchange) of Convertible Debt Instruments” (“Issue No. 06-06”) and in accordance with EITF Issue No. 96-19, “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments” (“Issue No. 96-19”), were accounted for as an extinguishment of debt. There was no gain or loss recognized on extinguishment.

As of December 31, 2007, SREG owned approximately 54% of the Company’s common stock.

On June 26, 2007, the Company pursuant to the terms of a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 2007 (the “June Purchase Agreement”), sold a total of 6.66 units (“Units”), each Unit comprising (i) a convertible promissory note (a “Note”), in the original principal amount of $75,000, and (ii) a warrant (a “Warrant”), to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $1.00 per share. The Company sold a total of $500,000 in principal amount of Notes and Warrants to purchase a total of 666,666 shares of Common Stock for total proceeds of $500,000. Each Note bears interest at a rate of 15% per annum. Principal and accrued but unpaid interest on each Note are payable in full on June 26, 2008. Amounts outstanding under each Note may be prepaid without penalty. The unpaid principal balance due under each Note, together with any accrued but unpaid interest, may be converted into unregistered shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.75 per share. Each Warrant is exercisable until June 26, 2010, at an exercise price of $0.50 per share (As amended, see Note 7) and has a cashless exercise feature. On November 26, 2007, the convertible promissory notes dated June 26, 2007, with a principal amount of $500,000, together with accrued and unpaid interest of $31,442, was converted into 1,062,884 unregistered shares of its common stock at a reduced conversion price of $0.50 per share. The Company recognized an expense of $177,147 related to the reduced conversion price, in accordance with SFAS No. 84, “Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt.

On November 7, 2007, the Company, pursuant to the terms of a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated November 7, 2007 (the “November Purchase Agreement”), sold a total of seventeen units (“Units”), at a price of $25,000 per Unit, with each Unit comprising (i) an unsecured promissory note (a “Note”), in the original principal amount of $25,000, and (ii) a warrant (a “Warrant”) to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.0001 par value (“Common Stock”), at a price of $.50 per share. The Company sold a total of $425,000 in principal amount of Notes and Warrants to purchase a total of 425,000 shares of Common Stock. Each Note bears interest at a rate of 15% per annum. Principal and accrued but unpaid interest on each Note are payable in full on April 30, 2008. Amounts outstanding under each Note may be prepaid without penalty. Each Warrant is exercisable until November 7, 2008, at an exercise price of $.50 per share, subject to adjustment as provide in the Warrant and has a cashless exercise feature.
 
24
 
Capital Resources Going Forward
 
Our intended plan of operations for 2008 is to manufacture, sell and distribute limited quantities of our product and to continue to develop our products. In the past, the Company primarily used funds derived from the private placement of its securities to fund its operations.
 
Cash on hand as of December 31, 2007, and cash generated by operations in conjunction with our working capital, will not be sufficient to continue our business for the next twelve months. We continually review our overall capital and funding needs, taking into account current business needs, as well as the Company’s future goals and requirements. Based on our business strategy, we believe we will need to increase our available capital through the incurrence of debt and the sale of additional securities. 

In February and March 2008, the Company pursuant to the terms of a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement, sold a total of five units (the “Units”), each Unit comprising (i) a 15% interest bearing unsecured promissory note in the principal amount of $25,000, with a six-month maturity date (the “Notes”), and (ii) a one year common stock warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share (the “Warrants”). The price of each unit was $25,000. The Company sold a total of $125,000 in principal amount of Notes and Warrants to purchase a total of 250,000 shares of Common Stock for total proceeds of $125,000.
 
Should our costs and expenses prove to be greater than we currently anticipate, or should we change our current business plan in a manner that will increase or accelerate our anticipated costs and expenses, the depletion of our working capital would be accelerated. To the extent it becomes necessary to raise additional cash in the future as our cash on hand and working capital resources are depleted, we intend to raise additional capital through the sale of additional equity securities, public or private sale of debt or equity securities, debt financing or short term loans, or a combination of these options. We currently do not have a binding commitment for, or readily available sources of, additional financing. We cannot give any assurance that we will be able to secure the additional cash or working capital that we may require to continue our operations under such circumstances or that it will be on terms that would not hinder our ability to execute our business strategy.
 
Our anticipated costs are estimates based upon our current business plan. Our actual costs could vary materially from these estimates. Further, we could change our current business plans, which may also result in a change in our anticipated costs.

Going Concern
  
We received an audit report for the year ended December 31, 2007, from our independent registered accounting firm containing an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We have had no significant operating history as of December 31, 2007, and since inception, we have not had significant revenues. We have raised additional equity and debt financing to fund operations and to provide additional working capital. However, the amount raised to date is not sufficient to meet our needs over the next twelve months and there are no assurances that we will be able to raise sufficient funds to continue our operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Contractual Obligations

The Company had an employment agreement with its President that expires July 31, 2008, under which the committed obligation is $110,000 at December 31, 2007. The Company had no other contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no guarantees, commitments, lease and debt agreements or other agreements that would trigger adverse changes in our credit rating, earnings, or cash flows, including requirements to perform under stand by agreements.
 
25
 
Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets

On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and impairment of long lived assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates, including those for the above described items.

The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate the carrying value of the asset or asset group may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of the asset or asset group from the expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted) of the related operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value.

Revenue Recognition

Although at this stage in our development we have had no significant revenues we consider revenue recognition a critical accounting policy as it affects the timing of earnings recognition. We recognize revenues on delivery and to date our operations have not involved any uncertainty of accounting treatment, subjective judgment or estimates over revenue recognition.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.
 
26
 
Item 8. Financial Statements

TRULITE, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
F-1
     
Balance Sheets
  
F-2
     
Statements of Operations
  
F-3
     
Statements of Cash Flows
  
F-4
     
Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit
  
F-5
     
Notes to Financial Statements
  
F-7
 
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the Board of Directors of
Trulite, Inc.
Houston, Texas
 
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Trulite, Inc., (a development stage company) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended, and for the period from inception (July 15, 2004) through December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We were not engaged to examine management’s assertion about the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, included in the accompanying Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and accordingly, we do not express an opinion thereon.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Trulite, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, and for the period from inception (July 15, 2004) through December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the financial statements, the Company has incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception and has negative working capital as of December 31, 2007. Those conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
 
/s/ UHY LLP
 
March 31, 2008
Houston, Texas
 
F-1
Trulite, Inc. (a Development Stage Company)
Balance Sheets

   
December 31,
  
December 31,
  
   
2007
  
2006
  
           
ASSETS
          
Current assets:
          
Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
374,134
  
$
275,957
  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    
23,793
    
13,372
  
Total current assets
    
397,927
    
289,329
  
               
Property and equipment, net
    
53,322
    
50,079
  
               
Patent application fees
    
41,963
    
19,843
  
Total assets
  
$
493,212
  
$
359,251
  
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
              
               
Current liabilities:
              
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
  
$
260,238
  
$
239,544
  
Due to affiliates
    
57,363
    
62,363
  
Notes payable to affiliates
    
-
    
1,250,000
  
Notes payable, net of unamortized discount of $28,778 as of December 31, 2007
    
396,222
    
-
  
Total current liabilities
    
713,823
    
1,551,907
  
               
Commitments and contingencies
              
               
Stockholders' deficit:
              
8% Cumulative Convertible, Series A Preferred Stock; $0.0001 par value, 1,500,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
    
-
    
-
  
Common Stock; $0.0001 par value, 50,000,000 and 20,000,000 shares authorized, 21,201,270 and 11,785,491 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
    
2,120
    
1,178
  
Additional paid-in-capital
    
15,572,927
    
9,537,425
  
Deficit accumulated during the development stage
    
(15,795,658
)
  
(10,731,259
)
Total stockholders' deficit
    
(220,611
)
  
(1,192,656
)
               
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit
  
$
493,212
  
$
359,251
  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
F-2
 
Trulite, Inc. (a Development Stage Company)
Statements of Operations

           
Period From
  
           
Inception
  
   
Twelve Months Ended
  
(July 15, 2004)
  
   
December 31,
  
Through
  
   
2007
  
2006
  
December 31, 2007
  
               
Sales
  
$
2,883
  
$
8,333
  
$
29,633
  
                     
Cost of sales
    
2,674
    
5,912
    
21,059
  
GROSS PROFIT
    
209
    
2,421
    
8,574
  
                     
Operating expenses:
                    
                     
Research and development
    
1,928,582
    
1,216,616
    
4,295,722
  
Depreciation
    
26,097
    
14,848
    
48,908
  
General and administrative
    
2,338,642
    
2,190,319
    
5,085,058
  
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
    
4,293,321
    
3,421,783
    
9,429,688
  
                     
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
    
(4,293,112
)
  
(3,419,362
)
  
(9,421,114
)
                     
Other income (expense):
                    
Interest expense
    
(436,708
)
  
(29,726
)
  
(467,097
)
Interest income
    
4,499
    
5,794
    
15,622
  
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
    
(432,209
)
  
(23,932
)
  
(451,475
)
                     
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    
(4,725,321
)
  
(3,443,294
)
  
(9,872,589
)
                     
Income taxes
    
-
    
-
    
-
  
NET LOSS
    
(4,725,321
)
  
(3,443,294
)
$
(9,872,589
)
                     
Preferred stock dividends
    
-
    
(39,275
)
      
                     
Deemed dividend on conversion of preferred stock to common stock
    
-
    
(1,586,150
)
      
                     
Deemed dividend on warrant modifications
    
(339,078
)
  
-
        
                     
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
  
$
(5,064,399
)
$
(5,068,719
)
      
                     
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
                    
Basic and diluted
  
$
(0.37
)
$
(0.37
)
      
Preferred and deemed dividends
    
(0.03
)
  
(0.18
)
      
Attributable to common stockholders
  
$
(0.40
)
$
(0.55
)
      
                     
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
                    
Basic
    
12,766,702
    
9,139,510
        
Diluted
    
12,766,702
    
9,139,510
        

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
F-3
 
Trulite, Inc. (a Development Stage Company)
Statements of Cash Flows

           
Period From
  
           
Inception
  
           
(July 15, 2004)
  
   
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
  
Through
  
   
2007
  
2006
  
December 31, 2007
  
               
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
              
Net loss
  
$
(4,725,321
)
$
(3,443,294
)
$
(9,872,589
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
                    
Depreciation
    
26,097
    
14,848
    
48,908
  
Amortization of debt discount
    
147,322
    
-
    
147,322
  
Common stock issued for consulting services
    
75,000
    
285,000
    
360,000
  
Common stock issued for management fees
    
-
    
-
    
133,840
  
Stock-based compensation expense
    
223,518
    
511,157
    
734,675
  
Warrants issued for consulting services
    
18,478
    
162,155
    
180,633
  
Debt conversion expense
    
177,147
    
 
    
177,147
  
Write-off of research and development expenses
    
-
    
-
    
606,798
  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                    
Due to/from affiliate
    
455,094
    
86,136
    
517,457
  
Accounts receivable
    
-
    
16,667
    
-
  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    
(10,421
)
  
(5,528
)
  
(17,328
)
Grants receivable
    
-
    
-
    
850
  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    
52,135
    
194,723
    
283,570
  
Net cash used in operating activities
    
(3,560,951
)
  
(2,178,136
)
  
(6,698,717
)
                     
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
                    
Purchases of fixed and intangible assets
   
(51,460
)
  
(31,889
)
  
(137,737
)
Net cash used in investing activities
    
(51,460
)
  
(31,889
)
  
(137,737
)
                     
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
                    
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    
1,200,000
    
1,000,000
    
2,200,000
  
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    
50,088
    
-
    
50,088
  
Proceeds from issuance of common stock warrants with debt financing
    
176,100
    
-
    
176,100
  
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock
    
-
    
-
    
1,250,000
  
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable
    
748,900
    
-
    
748,900
  
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable to affiliates
    
1,535,500
    
1,250,000
    
3,534,400
  
Net cash provided by financing activities
    
3,710,588
    
2,250,000
    
7,959,488
  
                     
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    
98,177
    
39,975
    
1,123,034
  
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
    
275,957
    
235,982
    
-
  
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
  
$
374,134
  
$
275,957
  
$
1,123,034
  
                     
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
                    
Preferred stock issued for acquisition
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
$
20,000
  
Common stock issued for acquisition
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
$
592,460
  
Common stock issued for consulting services
  
$
75,000
  
$
285,000
  
$
360,000
  
Common stock issued for management fees
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
$
133,840
  
Warrants issued for consulting services
  
$
18,478
  
$
162,155
  
$
180,633
  
Common stock options issued for compensation
  
$
223,518
  
$
511,157
  
$
734,675
  
Common stock issued through coversion of notes payable, including accrued interest of $31,442
  
$
531,442
  
$
-
  
$
531,442
  
Common stock issued through coversion of notes payable to affiliates, including accrued interest of $170,593
  
$
3,245,593
  
$
-
  
$
3,245,593
  
Additional paid-in capital credited through an expense recognized due to the induced conversion of notes payable
  
$
177,147
  
$
-
  
$
177,147
  
Affiliate payable relieved through issuance of note payable
  
$
289,500
  
$
-
  
$
289,500
  
Cash paid for interest
  
$
-
  
$
28,897
  
$
28,897
  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
F-4
 
Trulite, Inc. (a Development Stage Company)
Statements of Stockholders' Deficit
For the Periods From Inception (July 15, 2004) Through December 31, 2007

   
8% Cumulative
                      
   
Convertible Series A
          
Additional
          
   
Preferred Stock
  
Common Stock
  
Paid-in
  
Accumulated
      
   
Shares
  
Amount
  
Shares
  
Amount
  
Capital
  
Deficit
  
Total
  
                               
Cash issuances:
                              
                               
July 28, 2004; issuance of preferred stock at $1.00 per share
    
100,000
  
$
10
    
-
  
$
-
  
$
99,990
  
$
-
  
$
100,000
  
                                             
November 5, 2004; issuance of preferred stock at $1.00 per share
    
190,000
    
19
    
-
    
-
    
189,981
    
-
    
190,000
  
                                             
November 12, 2004; issuance of preferred stock at $1.00 per share
    
10,000
    
1
    
-
    
-
    
9,999
    
-
    
10,000
  
                                             
Non-cash issuances:
                                            
                                             
July 22, 2004; preferred stock issued in the acquisition of Trulite Technology, LC based on fair value of stock issued of $1.00 per share
    
20,000
    
2
    
-
    
-
    
19,998
    
-
    
20,000
  
                                             
July 22, 2004; common stock issued in the acquisition of Trulite Technology, LC based on fair value of stock issued of $0.20 per share (post April 2005 split)
    
-
    
-
    
2,962,300
    
296
    
592,164
    
-
    
592,460
  
                                             
July 28, 2004; common stock issued for management services based on fair value of stock issued of $0.20 per share (post April 2005 split)
    
-
    
-
    
343,850
    
34
    
68,736
    
-
    
68,770
  
                                             
Accretion of dividends
    
-
    
6,624
    
-
    
-
    
(6,624
)
  
-
    
-
  
                                             
Net loss
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
(878,022
)
  
(878,022
)
                                             
Balance, December 31, 2004
    
320,000
    
6,656
    
3,306,150
    
330
    
974,244
    
(878,022
)
  
103,208
  
                                             
Cash issuances:
                                            
                                             
February 1, 2005; issuance of preferred stock, at $1.00 per share
    
200,000
    
20
    
-
    
-
    
199,980
    
-
    
200,000
  
                                             
June 1, 2005; issuance of preferred stock at $0.80 per share
    
934,725
    
93
    
-
    
-
    
749,907
    
-
    
750,000
  
                                             
Non-cash issuances:
                                            
                                             
January 28, 2005; common stock issued for management services based on fair value of stock issued of $0.20 per share (post April 2005 split)
    
-
    
-
    
325,350
    
33
    
65,037
    
-
    
65,070
  
                                             
Accretion of dividends
    
-
    
84,074
    
-
    
-
    
(84,074
)
  
-
    
-
  
                                             
Net loss
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
(825,952
)
  
(825,952
)
                                             
Balance, December 31, 2005
    
1,454,725
    
90,843
    
3,631,500
    
363
    
1,905,094
    
(1,703,974
)
  
292,326
  
                                             
Cash issuances:
                                            
                                             
April 13, 2006; issuance of common stock and warrants
    
-
    
-
    
1,000,000
    
100
    
999,900
    
-
    
1,000,000
  
                                             
Non-cash issuances:
                                            
                                             
April 26, 2006; common stock issued for consulting services based on fair value of stock issued of $0.95 per share
    
-
    
-
    
300,000
    
30
    
284,970
    
-
    
285,000
  
                                             
April 26, 2006; warrants to purchase common stock issued for consulting services based on fair value of warrants issued
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
162,155
    
-
    
162,155
  
                                             
Accretion of dividends
    
-
    
39,275
    
-
    
-
    
(39,275
)
  
-
    
-
  
                                             
May 2, 2006; accretion of preferred stock for deemed dividend on conversion of accrued dividends to common stock
    
-
    
161,388
    
-
    
-
    
(161,388
)
  
-
    
-
  
                                             
May 2, 2006; accretion of preferred stock for deemed dividend on conversion to common stock
    
-
    
1,424,762
    
-
    
-
    
(978,494
)
  
(446,268
)
  
-
  
                                             
May 2, 2006; conversion of preferred stock to common stock
    
(1,454,725
)
  
(1,716,268
)
  
6,853,991
    
685
    
6,853,306
    
(5,137,723
)
  
-
  
                                             
Stock-based compensation
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
511,157
    
-
    
511,157
  
                                             
Net loss
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
(3,443,294
)
  
(3,443,294
)
                                             
Balance, December 31, 2006
    
-
    
-
    
11,785,491
    
1,178
    
9,537,425
    
(10,731,259
)
  
(1,192,656
)
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
F-5
 
Trulite, Inc. (a Development Stage Company)
Statements of Stockholders' Deficit (Continued)
For the Periods From Inception (July 15, 2004) Through December 31, 2007

   
8% Cumulative
                      
   
Convertible Series A
          
Additional
          
   
Preferred Stock
  
Common Stock
  
Paid-in
  
Accumulated
      
   
Shares
  
Amount
  
Shares
  
Amount
  
Capital
  
Deficit
  
Total
  
                               
Cash issuances:
                              
                               
April 1, 2007; exercise of stock options
    
-
    
-
    
100
    
-
    
88
    
-
    
88
  
                                             
September 9, 2007; exercise of stock options
    
-
    
-
    
50,000
    
5
    
49,995
    
-
    
50,000
  
                                             
November 26, 2007; issuance of common stock
    
-
    
-
    
2,400,000
    
240
    
1,199,760
    
-
    
1,200,000
  
                                             
Non-cash issuance:
                                            
                                             
June 26, 2007; common stock issued for consulting services based on fair value of stock issued of $0.75 per share
    
-
    
-
    
100,000
    
10
    
74,990
    
-
    
75,000
  
                                             
November 26, 2007; issuance of common stock through converion of related party notes payable
    
-
    
-
    
5,802,795
    
581
    
3,245,012
    
-
    
3,245,593
  
                                             
November 26, 2007; issuance of common stock through induced conversion of notes payable and recognition of conversion expense of $177,147
    
-
    
-
    
1,062,884
    
106
    
708,483
    
-
    
708,589
  
                                             
February, 22, 2007; deemed dividend on warrant modification
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
104,881
    
(104,881
)
  
-
  
                                             
April 19, 2007; warrants to purchase common stock issued for consulting services based on fair value of warrants issued
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
18,478
    
-
    
18,478
  
                                             
June 26, 2007; warrants issued with convertible debt
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
135,300
    
-
    
135,300
  
                                             
November 7, 2007; warrants issued with notes payable
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
40,800
    
-
    
40,800
  
                                             
November 19, 2007; deemed dividend on warrant modification
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
234,197
    
(234,197
)
  
-
  
                                             
Stock-based compensation
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
223,518
    
-
    
223,518
  
                                             
Net Loss
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
(4,725,321
)
  
(4,725,321
)
                                             
Balance, December 31, 2007
    
-
  
$
-
    
21,201,270
  
$
2,120
  
$
15,572,927
  
$
(15,795,658
)
$
(220,611
)
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
F-6
Trulite, Inc. 
(A Development Stage Company) 
Notes to Financial Statements 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
Note 1 – Nature of Operations

Trulite, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on July 15, 2004, in the State of Delaware. The Company is a development stage entity and is engaged in the development, production, sourcing, marketing and selling of portable, semi-portable and stationary products, components and systems that can generate power for use in off-grid applications requiring power up to one kilowatt. These products, components and systems include hydrogen fuel cells, photovoltaic solar panels, wind micro-turbines, batteries, charge controllers and inverters. Solar panels and on-site wind micro-turbines provide intermittent power that frequently must be stored to meet requirements when the panels are not producing. The Trulite fuel cells can provide power when the solar panels or wind turbines are not operating for extended and consistent power availability.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, and since inception (July 15, 2004), the Company has not had significant revenues. The Company has no significant operating history as of December 31, 2007. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. From inception (July 15, 2004) through December 31, 2007, management has raised additional equity and debt financing to fund operations and to provide additional working capital. However, there is no assurance that future such financing will be in amounts sufficient to meet the Company’s needs.

The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Accounts receivable are reported at outstanding principal less allowance for doubtful accounts. Earnings are charged with a provision for doubtful accounts based on a current review of the collectability of the accounts. Accounts deemed uncollectible are applied against the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Revenue Recognition. Revenue from sales is recognized on delivery.

Property and Equipment. Property and equipment is carried at cost. The Company depreciates property and equipment using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets ranging from three to seven years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred and expenditures for major improvements are capitalized. Gains and losses from retirement or replacement of property and equipment are included in operations.

Research and Development Costs. Expenditures for research activities relating to product development and improvement are charged to expense as incurred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate the carrying value of the asset or asset group may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of the asset or asset group from the expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted) of the related operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value.
 
F-7
Trulite, Inc. 
(A Development Stage Company) 
Notes to Financial Statements 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Income Taxes. The liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The realizability of deferred tax assets are evaluated annually and a valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not give rise to future benefits in the Company’s tax returns.

The Company’s estimates are based on the information available to it at the time that it prepares the income tax provision. The Company generally files its annual income tax returns several months after its fiscal year-end. Income tax returns are subject to audit by federal, state, and local governments, generally years after the returns are filed. These returns could be subject to material adjustments or differing interpretations of the tax laws.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation Number 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), which is intended to clarify the accounting for income taxes prescribing a minimum recognition threshold for a tax provision before being recognized in the consolidated financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. In accordance with the requirements of FIN 48, the Company evaluated all tax years still subject to potential audit under state and federal income tax law in reaching its accounting conclusions. As a result, the Company concluded it did not have any unrecognized tax benefits or any additional tax liabilities after applying FIN 48 as of the January 1, 2007 adoption date or for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 therefore had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. See Note 10 to the Company’s consolidated financial statement for further discussion.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Stock-Based Compensation. At December 31, 2007, the Company had a stock-based employee compensation plan. The Company accounts for stock grants issued under the plan in accordance with the recognition and measurement principles of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”). SFAS No. 123R requires that expense resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements at fair value.

Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior period amounts to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net loss or stockholders’ deficit.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”) defines fair value and applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. For non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements at least annually as well as for all financial assets and liabilities, SFAS No. 157 is effective in financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. For non-financial assets and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, SFAS No. 157 is effective in financial statement issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157 on its financial statements.
 
F-8
Trulite, Inc. 
(A Development Stage Company) 
Notes to Financial Statements 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting For Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).” The standard requires companies to recognize the funded status (plan obligations less the fair value of plan assets) of pension and other postretirement benefit plans on their balance sheets, effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The statement will also require fiscal year-end measurements of plan assets and benefit obligations, effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. SFAS No. 158 will have no effect on the Company’s financial statements, as the Company does not maintain defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities," which permits the choice to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at their fair value at specified election dates. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2008, unless early adoption is elected. The Company does not expect the new standard to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operation.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) requires the Company to continue to follow the guidance in SFAS No. 141 for certain aspects of business combinations, with additional guidance provided defining the acquirer, recognizing and measuring the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, assets and liabilities arising from contingencies, defining a bargain purchase and recognizing and measuring goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase. This statement is effective for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008. The Company will implement SFAS No. 141(R) for any business combinations occurring at or subsequent to January 1, 2009. 

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements,” an Amendment of ARB No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 with retrospective application. SFAS No. 160 will not impact the Company’s financial statements. 

Note 3 – Property and Equipment

Property and Equipment consists of the following:

   
December 31,
  
December 31,
  
   
2007
  
2006
  
           
Office and other equipment
  
$
79,657
  
$
59,249
  
Manufacturing equipment
    
15,450
   
9,491
 
Test equipment
    
7,123
   
4,150
 
Total fixed assets
    
102,230
   
72,890
 
               
Accumulated depreciation
    
(48,908
)
  
(22,811
)
Property and equipment, net
  
$
53,322
  
$
50,079
  
 
F-9
Trulite, Inc. 
(A Development Stage Company) 
Notes to Financial Statements 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
Note 4 – Accounts Payable and Accrued liabilities

   
December 31,
  
December 31,
  
   
2007
  
2006
  
           
Accounts payable
  
$
137,732
  
$
134,905
  
Accrued expenses
    
122,506
   
104,639
 
   
$
260,238
  
$
239,544
  
 
Note 5 – Notes Payable to Affiliates and Conversion to Common Stock

Contango Venture Capital Corporation (“CVCC”)

The Company had incurred indebtedness from CVCC through issuance of promissory notes as follows:

Issue date
  
Maturity
  
Principal
  
Interest rate
  
August 9, 2006
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
125,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
November 22, 2006
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
400,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
February 6, 2007
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
240,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
May 30, 2007
   February 19, 2008  
$
240,000
   11.25%
 
August 20, 2007
   May 16, 2008  
$
250,000
   12.25%
 

On November 26, 2007, the Company and CVCC, entered into a Third Amendment to Subscription Agreement (the “CVCC Amended Subscription Agreement”) whereby, in consideration of cancellation of the entire principal balance of, and accrued but unpaid interest on, the promissory notes dated August 9, 2006, November 22, 2006 and February 6, 2007, made by the Company in favor of CVCC (the “CVCC Notes”), the $844,628 outstanding under the CVCC Notes, which included $79,628 of accrued and unpaid interest, was converted into 1,260,639 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock.

On November 26, 2007, the Company and CVCC entered into a Subscription Agreement (the “November 2007 CVCC Subscription Agreement”), whereby, in consideration of cancellation of the entire principal balance of, and accrued but unpaid interest on, the promissory notes dated May 30, 2007 and August 20, 2007, made by the Company in favor of CVCC (the “CVCC New Notes”), the $511,912 outstanding under the CVCC New Notes, which included $21,912 of accrued and unpaid interest, was converted into 764,048 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock.

The CVCC Amended Subscription Agreement and the November 2007 CVCC Subscription Agreement are substantive conversion options in accordance with the Emerging Issue Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 06-06, “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification (or Exchange) of Convertible Debt Instruments” (“Issue No. 06-06”) and in accordance with EITF Issue No. 96-19, “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments” (“Issue No. 96-19”), were accounted for as an extinguishment of debt. Management of CVCC allowed for the conversion of CVCC Notes and CVCC New Notes at a stock price of $0.67 per share, which was greater than the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock $0.50 per share on the date of conversion. An additional 688,393 shares of common stock, at an estimated fair value of $344,197, which would have been issued to CVCC if the CVCC Notes and CVCC New Notes were converted at the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock, was credited to additional paid-in capital.

As of December 31, 2007, CVCC owned approximately 19% of the Company’s common stock.
 
F-10
Trulite, Inc. 
(A Development Stage Company) 
Notes to Financial Statements 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
 
Note 5 – Notes Payable to Affiliates and Conversion to Common Stock (Continued)
 
Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC and a wholly owned subsidiary (“SREG”)
 
The Company had incurred indebtedness from SREG through issuance of promissory notes as follows:

Issue date
  
Maturity
  
Principal
  
Interest rate
  
August 9, 2006
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
125,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
September 21, 2006
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
250,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
October 26, 2006
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
250,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
November 28, 2006
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
100,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
February 6, 2007
   December 31, 2007 (As amended)
 
$
360,000
   12.25% (As amended)
 
May 31, 2007
   February 19, 2008  
$
360,000
   11.25%
 
August 20, 2007
   May 16, 2008  
$
375,000
   12.25%
 

On November 26, 2007, the Company and SREG entered into a Third Amendment to Subscription Agreement (the “SREG Amended Subscription Agreement”) whereby, in consideration of cancellation of the entire principal balance of, and accrued but unpaid interest on, the promissory notes dated August 9, 2006, September 21, 2006, October 26, 2006, November 28, 2006 and February 6, 2007, made by the Company in favor of SREG (the “SREG Notes”), the $1,130,524 outstanding under the SREG Notes, which included $45,524 of accrued and unpaid interest, was converted into 2,261,048 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock.

On November 26, 2007, the Company and SREG entered into a Subscription Agreement (the “November 2007 SREG Subscription Agreement”), whereby, in consideration of cancellation of the entire principal balance of, and accrued but unpaid interest on, the promissory notes dated May 31, 2007 and August 20, 2007, made by the Company in favor of SREG (the “SREG New Notes”), the $758,530 outstanding under the SREG New Notes, which included $23,530 of accrued and unpaid interest, was converted into 1,517,060 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock.

The SREG Amended Subscription Agreement and the November 2007 SREG Subscription Agreement are substantive conversion options in accordance with EITF Issue No. 06-06, “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification (or Exchange) of Convertible Debt Instruments” (“Issue No. 06-06”) and in accordance with EITF Issue No. 96-19, “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments” (“Issue No. 96-19”), were accounted for as an extinguishment of debt. There was no gain or loss recognized on extinguishment.

As of December 31, 2007, SREG owns approximately 54% of the Company’s common stock.

Note 6 – Note and Warrant Purchase Agreements

On June 26, 2007, the Company pursuant to the terms of a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 2007 (the “June Purchase Agreement”), sold a total of 6.66 units (“Units”), each Unit comprising (i) a convertible promissory note (a “Note”), in the original principal amount of $75,000, and (ii) a warrant (a “Warrant”), to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $1.00 per share. The Company sold a total of $500,000 in principal amount of Notes and Warrants to purchase a total of 666,666 shares of Common Stock for total proceeds of $500,000. Each Note bears interest at a rate of 15% per annum. Principal and accrued but unpaid interest on each Note are payable in full on June 26, 2008. Amounts outstanding under each Note may be prepaid without penalty. The unpaid principal balance due under each Note, together with any accrued but unpaid interest, may be converted into unregistered shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.75 per share. Each Warrant is exercisable until June 26, 2010, at an exercise price of $0.50 per share (As amended, see Note 7) and has a cashless exercise feature. On November 26, 2007, the convertible promissory notes dated June 26, 2007, with a principal amount of $500,000, together with accrued and unpaid interest of $31,442, was converted into 1,062,884 unregistered shares of its common stock at a reduced conversion price of $0.50 per share. The Company recognized a debt conversion expense of $177,147 related to the reduced conversion price, in accordance with SFAS No. 84, “Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt, which is included in general and administrative expenses in the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
F-11
Trulite, Inc. 
(A Development Stage Company) 
Notes to Financial Statements 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
Note 6 – Note and Warrant Purchase Agreements (Continued) 

On November 7, 2007, the Company, pursuant to the terms of a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated November 7, 2007 (the “November Purchase Agreement”), sold a total of seventeen units (“Units”), at a price of $25,000 per Unit, with each Unit comprising (i) an unsecured promissory note (a “Note”), in the original principal amount of $25,000, and (ii) a warrant (a “Warrant”) to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.0001 par value (“Common Stock”), at a price of $.50 per share. The Company sold a total of $425,000 in principal amount of Notes and Warrants to purchase a total of 425,000 shares of Common Stock. Each Note bears interest at a rate of 15% per annum. Principal and accrued but unpaid interest on each Note are payable in full on April 30, 2008. Amounts outstanding under each Note may be prepaid without penalty. Each Warrant is exercisable until November 7, 2008, at an exercise price of $.50 per share, subject to adjustment as provide in the Warrant and has a cashless exercise feature.

In accordance with the guidelines of APB No. 14, “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants,” the proceeds of the November Purchase Agreement and the June Purchase Agreement were allocated to the Warrants and to the Notes based on the relative fair values of the two instruments at the date of issuance. The fair value of the Warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model, assuming a risk-free interest rate of 3.71 % and 4.63%, a volatility factor of 50% and 63%, dividend yields of 0% and a contractual life of one and three years for the November and June Purchase Agreements, respectively. Of the $425,000 of proceeds received from the November Purchase Agreement $40,800 was recorded to additional paid-in capital to recognize the issuance of the Warrants and as a discount to the face amount of the Notes of $425,000. The discount will be amortized to interest expense through the date of maturity, April 30, 2008. Of the $500,000 of proceeds received from the June Purchase Agreement, $135,300 was recorded to additional paid-in capital to recognize the issuance of the Warrants and as a discount to the face amount of the Notes of $500,000. The discount will be amortized to interest expense through date of maturity, June 26, 2008. The convertible feature contained in the Notes of the June Purchase Agreement was not a beneficial conversion feature in accordance with EITF 98-5, “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios,” and thus no portion of the proceeds was allocated to the conversion feature of the Notes.

Note 7 – Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

On April 13, 2006, the Company raised additional equity of $1,000,000 through the issuance of common stock for cash consideration of $1.00 per share. These issuances of common stock also included one year warrants to purchase an additional 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $1.50 per common share (amended to $0.50 per share on November 19, 2007) that expire on April 13, 2007. The value of the warrants was included as additional paid in capital.

On April 26, 2006, the Company also entered into two consulting agreements for investment banking services, under which the Company was required to issue 300,000 shares of restricted common stock and 400,000 five-year warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $3.00 per share (amended to $0.50 per share on November 19, 2007). One of the agreements terminates on April 25, 2008, and the second terminates on June 30, 2008. The fair value of the warrants, utilizing the Black-Scholes method and assuming a risk-free interest rate of 4.97%, expected volatility of 77%, expected life of 5 years and no dividend yield, resulted in a fair value of $162,155, which was recorded as a component of general and administrative expense in the second quarter of 2006.

On February 22, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors agreed to extend the term of warrants, until April 13, 2008, that were issued on April 13, 2006 in connection with the issuance of common stock for cash consideration of $1.00 per share. These warrants entitled the holders to purchase an additional 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an original exercise price of $1.50 per common share (amended to $0.50 per share on November 19, 2007), that were originally set to expire on April 13, 2007. A difference of $104,881 in the fair value of these warrants after modification, when compared to their fair value immediately prior to the modification, was recorded as a deemed dividend in the first quarter of 2007.
 
F-12
Trulite, Inc. 
(A Development Stage Company) 
Notes to Financial Statements 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
Note 7 – Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)
 
On November 19, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the amendment of any and all warrants to purchase the common stock of the Company to reflect an exercise price of $0.50 per share. Outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:

Date
 Issued
  
Expiration
Date
  
Original
Exercise Price
  
Amended Exercise
Price
  
# of Common Shares for which Warrant is Exercisable
  
   
4/13/2008
  
$
1.50
  
$
0.50
    
1,000,000
  
4/26/2006
    
4/26/2011
  
$
3.00
  
$
0.50
    
400,000
  
4/19/2007
    
4/19/2009
  
$
1.20
  
$
0.50
    
120,000
  
6/26/2007
    
6/26/2010
  
$
1.00
  
$
0.50
    
666,666
  
11/7/2007
    
11/7/2008
  
$
0.50
  
$
0.50
    
425,000
  
                       
2,611,666
  
 
A difference of $234,197 in the fair value of these warrants after modification, when compared to their fair value immediately prior to the modification, was recorded as a deemed dividend in the fourth quarter of 2007.

On November 26, 2007, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with SREG. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold a total of 2,400,000 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.0001 par value to SREG for total proceeds of $1,200,000, or $0.50 per share.

On November 26, 2007, the Company entered into the CVCC Amended Subscription Agreement and the November 2007 CVCC Subscription Agreement under which it issued 2,024,687 unregistered shares of its common stock. See Note 5.

On November 26, 2007, the Company entered into the SREG Amended Subscription Agreement and the November 2007 SREG Subscription Agreement under which it issued 3,778,108 unregistered shares of its common stock. See Note 5.

On November 26, 2007, the Company issued 1,062,884 unregistered shares of its common stock through the conversion of the convertible promissory notes dated June 26, 2007. See Note 6.

On June 26, 2007, the Company agreed to issue 100,000 unregistered shares of common stock to a consultant who provided services to the Company in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the June Purchase Agreement, including providing advice regarding the terms of the Notes and Warrants and identifying potential investors. The Company recognized $75,000 as a component of general and administrative expenses, the estimated fair value of the shares issued.

On May 4, 2007, the Company amended its certificate of incorporation to increase the authorized capital stock of the Company from 21,500,000 shares to 51,500,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of 50,000,000 shares of common stock and 1,500,000 shares of preferred stock.

On April 19, 2007, the Company issued two-year warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $1.20 per share (amended to $0.50 per share on November 19, 2007), for consulting services from a former employee. The fair value of the warrants, utilizing the Black-Scholes method and assuming a risk-free interest rate of 4.64%, expected volatility of 59%, expected life of 2 years and no dividend yield, resulted in a fair value of $18,478, which was recorded as a component of general and administrative expense.
 
F-13
Trulite, Inc. 
(A Development Stage Company) 
Notes to Financial Statements 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
Note 7 – Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

Series A Preferred Stock

In May 2006, all of the Company’s 8% Cumulative Convertible Series A Preferred Stock was converted into the Company’s common stock.

The 8% Cumulative Convertible Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) had a liquidation value of $1.00 per share plus dividends whether or not earned or declared from the issuance date thereof at the annual rate of eight percent (8%) (the “Preferred Dividends”) of $1.00 per share (the “Original Issue Price”), payable at the option of the Company in cash or in shares of Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, the Preferred Stock had preferential treatment in liquidation to all Common Stock and any other stock of the Company ranking junior to the Series A Preferred Stock. Accretion of cumulative dividends outstanding on these shares was $39,275 and $84,074 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock was convertible at any time into common shares of the Company by dividing the original issue price by a conversion price as defined. The Series A Preferred Stock was redeemable at the option of the majority holders in cash at $1.00 per share plus all accrued and unpaid Preferred Dividends on the fifth anniversary of the date of initial issuance or other events relating to change in 25% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the Company or a merger or consolidation as defined. Each holder of Series A Preferred Stock was entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of Common Stock into which the shares of Series A Preferred Stock was convertible.

On May 2, 2006, 1,454,725 shares of Series A Preferred Stock were converted into 6,562,630 shares of common stock. In addition, the cumulative accreted dividends of $129,973 were converted into 291,361 shares of common stock. Upon the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $1,424,762 to reflect the deemed dividend on conversion in accordance with EITF Topic D-42, “The Effect on the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock.” In addition, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $161,388 to reflect the deemed dividend on conversion of accreted dividends. The total of the two “deemed dividends” was $1,586,150. The amount of charge is equal to the difference in the value at the time of exchange of the shares of common stock exchanged for the preferred stock minus the value of the shares that the holders of the preferred stock otherwise would have had the right to receive upon conversion of the preferred stock. The charge did not affect the Company’s reported revenue, operating income, net loss, assets, liabilities or stockholders’ deficit.

Note 8 – Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has granted options to purchase common stock to employees, consultants and outside directors under the Trulite, Inc. Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated (the “Plan”). A total of 5,000,000 shares are reserved for issuance and, as of December 31, 2007, 1,626,421 shares remained available for grant under the Plan.

For the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, total stock-based compensation expense recognized was $223,518 and $511,157, respectively. The total unrecognized compensation cost at December 31, 2007, relating to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan, was $793,895. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.1 years.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company granted options to purchase 1,125,916 shares of common stock under the plan. With respect to 375,916 of these options, the exercise price is $1.00 per common share. With respect to 750,000 of these options the exercise price is $0.75 per common share. The exercise price was determined based on management’s estimate of fair value on the date of grant. The options vest over a weighted average period of 3.8 years and have a contractual life of seven years. During 2006, the Company granted options to purchase 2,339,465 shares of common stock under the Plan. With respect to 1,175,339 of these shares, the exercise price is $0.88 per common share, which is equivalent to the fair value of a share of common stock on the date of grant. With respect to 5,000 of these shares, the exercise price is $0.88 per common share, whereas the fair value of a share of common stock on the date of grant was $0.18. With respect to options to purchase the additional 1,159,126 shares of common stock, the exercise price is $1.00 per common share. 1,065,407 of these options were vested upon grant, whereas the remaining 1,274,058 vest over four years and have varying contractual lives ranging from four to seven years. The fair value of these options was based upon the weighted average assumptions noted below:
 
F-14
Trulite, Inc. 
(A Development Stage Company) 
Notes to Financial Statements 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
Note 8 – Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
 
   
For the Year Ended December 31,
  
Assumptions
  
2007
  
2006
  
           
Risk free rate
    
4.76
%
  
4.85
%
Expected life (in years)
    
4.7
   
3.5
 
Expected volatility
    
64
%
  
71
%
Expected dividends
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
Fair value
  
$
0.47
  
$
0.47
  
 
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options under SFAS No. 123R at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected term (estimated period of time outstanding) of option grants is based on the “simplified” method of estimating expected term for “plain vanilla” options allowed by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, and varies based on the vesting period and contractual term of the option. Expected volatility has historically been based on an evaluation of similar companies’ trading activity. The Company has not issued any cash dividends on its common stock.

The following summary presents information regarding outstanding options as of December 31, 2007, and the changes during the twelve months then ended:

Option Activity
                  
   
Shares
  
Weighted Average
  
Weighted Average
  
Aggregate
  
   
Under
  
Exercise Price
  
Remaining
  
Intrinsic
  
   
Options
  
Per Share
  
Contractual Term
  
Value
  
                   
Outstanding at January 1, 2007
    
2,447,060
 
$
0.94
              
Granted
    
1,125,916
   
0.83
             
Exercised
    
(50,000
)
  
1.00
             
Forfeited/Cancelled
    
(97,300
)
  
1.00
             
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
    
3,425,676
   
0.90
   
4.9 years
 
$
-
  
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2007
    
3,230,941
   
0.90
         
-
 
Exercisable at December 31, 2007
    
1,478,330
 
$
0.90
    
3.3 years
 
$
-
  

Note 9 – Research and Development Costs

Expenditures for research activities relating to product development and improvement are charged to expense as incurred. For the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, research and development costs were $1,928,582 and $1,216,616, respectively.

Note 10 – Income taxes

Since inception, the Company has incurred net operating losses and, accordingly, no provision for current income taxes has been recorded in these financial statements. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded in respect of the net deferred tax assets as management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, the Company has provided for a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
 
F-15
Trulite, Inc. 
(A Development Stage Company) 
Notes to Financial Statements 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
Note 10 – Income taxes (Continued)

The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. After application of the provisions of FIN 48, it was not necessary for the Company to recognize any liability for unrecognized tax benefits or adjustment to the balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2007. The Company’s policy is to classify interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of January 1, 2007, the Company had no accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits. As of January 1, 2007, after the implementation of FIN 48, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits. Therefore, there is no amount, if recognized, that would affect the effective tax rate.

The Company files an income tax return in the U.S. federal jurisdiction. For federal tax purposes, the Company’s 2004 through 2006 tax years remain open for examination by the tax authorities under the normal three year statute of limitations. The adoption of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
 
The Company did not incur any income tax expense due to operating losses and the related increase in the valuation allowance. The Company has established a valuation allowance for the full amount of the deferred tax assets as management does not currently believe that it is more likely than not that these assets will be recovered in the foreseeable future.
 
The reconciliation of income taxes at the statutory rate of 35% applied to the loss before taxes for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, are as follows:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
  
   
2007
  
2006
  
Computed income tax benefit
  
$
(1,653,862
)
$
(1,205,153
)
Qualified stock compensation
    
78,231
    
178,905
  
Debt conversion expense
    
62,001
    
-
  
Other permanent differences
    
1,623
    
3,485
  
Increase in valuation allowance
    
1,512,007
   
1,022,763
 
Tax expense
  
$
-
  
$
-
  

The tax effects of the temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
 
   
At December 31,
  
   
2007
  
2006
  
Deferred tax assets:
              
Loss carryforwards
  
$
2,885,165
  
$
1,398,286
  
Stock-based expense
    
261,205
   
228,487
 
Other temporary differences
    
10,045
   
17,635
 
     
3,156,415
   
1,644,408
 
Less valuation allowance
    
(3,156,415
)
  
(1,644,408
)
Net deferred tax asset
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
 
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $8.2 million. To the extent not utilized, the net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2024.
 
F-16
Trulite, Inc. 
(A Development Stage Company) 
Notes to Financial Statements 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies

Concentrations of Credit Risk.

The Company maintains cash balances at a financial institution which at times exceeds federally insured amounts. The Company has not experienced any material losses in such accounts. 
 
Leases

Rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $32,848 and $35,737, respectively. Rent expense is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations. The Company’s lease agreement will expire in May 2008, with future rental commitments of approximately $15,000.
 
Other

The Company had an employment agreement with its President that expires July 31, 2008, under which the committed obligation is $110,000 at December 31, 2007.
 
Note 12 – Related Party Transactions

Due to affiliates

As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, amounts due to affiliates consisted of $57,363 and $62,363 due to SREG for management and administrative services, respectively.

During the twelve month period ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, SREG billed the Company $454,907 and $71,121, respectively, for management and administrative services.

Interest expense

For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company incurred interest expense of $144,875 and $101,184, respectively, related to promissory notes with SREG and CVCC. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company incurred interest expense of $19,082 and $10,644, respectively, related to promissory notes with SREG and CVCC.
 
F-17
Trulite, Inc. 
(A Development Stage Company) 
Notes to Financial Statements 
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

Note 13 – Net Loss Per Share
 

   
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
  
   
2007
  
2006
  
Numerator:
          
Net loss
  
$
(4,725,321
)
$
(3,443,294
)
               
Increases to Net Loss:
              
               
Preferred stock dividends
    
-
   
(39,275
)
               
Deemed dividend on conversion of preferred stock to common stock
    
-
   
(1,586,150
)
               
Deemed dividend on warrant extension
    
(339,078
)
  
-
 
               
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
  
$
(5,064,399
)
$
(5,068,719
)
               
Denominator
              
Basic earnings per share - weighted average common shares outstanding
    
12,766,702
   
9,139,510
 
               
Weighted-average dilutive effect of stock-based awards and common stock issuable upon conversion of preferred stock, net of assumed repurchase of treasury stock
    
-
   
-
 
               
Fully-diluted earnings per share - weighted average common shares outstanding
    
12,766,702
   
9,139,510
 
               
Net loss per common share
              
Basic and diluted
  
$
(0.37
)
$
(0.37
)
Preferred and deemed dividends
    
(0.03
)
  
(0.18
)
Attributable to common stockholders
  
$
(0.40
)
$
(0.55
)
 
Basic and diluted net loss per share are the same since the effect of all common stock equivalents are anti-dilutive to the Company’s net loss in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings per Share.

The following weighted average securities are not included in the computation of diluted loss per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive:

         
 
   
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
  
   
2007
  
2006
  
           
Common stock options
    
2,924,069
   
1,610,461
 
Common stock warrants
    
1,809,246
   
986,301
 
8% cumulative convertible series A preferred stock
    
-
   
486,237
 
Convertible debt (if-converted)
    
2,904,519
   
-
 
 
Note 14 – Subsequent Event

In February and March 2008, the Company pursuant to the terms of a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement, sold a total of five units (the “Units”), each Unit comprising (i) a 15% interest bearing unsecured promissory note in the principal amount of $25,000, with a six-month maturity date (the “Notes”), and (ii) a one year common stock warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share (the “Warrants”). The price of each unit was $25,000. The Company sold a total of $125,000 in principal amount of Notes and Warrants to purchase a total of 250,000 shares of Common Stock for total proceeds of $125,000.
 
F-18
 
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

 None.

Item 9A(T). Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     
In an effort to ensure that the information the Company must disclose in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as of December 31, 2007. Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of December 31, 2007, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to information relating to the Company required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic reports filed with the SEC.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
    
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:

·  
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;

·  
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and

·  
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation was conducted on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

26

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
     
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Item 9B. Other Information. 

None.
 
Part III
 
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this form 10-K.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this form 10-K.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this form 10-K.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this form 10-K.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this form 10-K.

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Index to Exhibits
 
Number
   Description
3.1 (1)
  
Certificate of Incorporation
3.2 (1) 
  
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation
3.3 (1)
  
Bylaws
3.4 (1)
  
Application of Certificate of Authority (Texas)
3.5 (13)
  
Amendment to Bylaws
3.6 (17)
  
Amended and Restated Bylaws
4.1 (1) 
  
Certificate of Designation of the 8% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A
4.2 (1)
  
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Designation of the 8% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A
 
27

Number
  
Description
10.2 (1)
  
April 2005 Option Agreement of John Sifonis
10.3 (1)
  
October 2005 Option Agreement of John Sifonis
10.4 (1)
  
Employment Agreement of Kevin Shurtleff
10.5 (1)
  
Employment Agreement of Jerry Metz
10.6 (1)
  
April 2005 Option Agreement of Jerry Metz
10.7 (1)
  
October 2005 Option Agreement of Jerry Metz
10.8 (1)
  
Employment Agreement of James A. Longaker
10.9 (1)
  
July 2005 Option Agreement of James A. Longaker
10.10 (1)
  
Employment Agreement of Eric Ladd
10.11 (1)
  
Trulite, Inc. Stock Option Plan
10.12 (1)
  
Contribution Agreement
10.13 (1)
  
Waiver Agreement
10.14 (1)
  
Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement
10.15 (1)
  
Addendum to Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement
10.16 (1)
  
Investor’s Rights Agreement
10.17 (1)
  
Right of First Refusal and Co-Sale Agreement
10.18 (4)
  
Option Agreement with Synexus Energy, Inc.
10.19 (5)
  
Stockholder Lock-Up Agreement with Contango Capital Partners, LP
10.20 (5)
  
Consulting Agreement with Boru Enterprises, Inc.
10.21 (5)
  
Memorandum of Understanding with Synexus Energy, Inc.
10.22 (5)
  
Grant Documents from The Defense Threat Reduction Agency and the United States Air Force
10.23 (6)
  
Consulting Agreement with Jelco, Inc.
10.24 (6)
  
Consulting Agreement with Ascend Renewable Technologies, LLC
10.25 (6)
  
Employment Agreement of Christopher Brydon
10.26 (6)
  
Employment Agreement of Eric Ladd
10.27 (6)
  
Employment Agreement of John Patton
10.28 (6)
  
Employment Agreement of Kevin Shurtleff
10.29 (6)
  
Stockholder Lock-Up Agreement with James Longaker
10.30 (6)
  
Stockholder Lock-Up Agreement with John Sifonis
10.31 (6) 
  
Stockholder Lock-Up Agreement with Kevin Shurtleff
10.32 (6)
  
Stockholder Lock-Up Agreement with Eric Ladd
10.33 (6)
  
Amended Stock Option Plan
10.34 (6)
  
Stock Option Agreement with John Berger
10.35 (6)
  
Stock Option Agreement with Christopher Brydon
10.36 (6)
  
Stock Option Agreement with William Flores
10.37 (6)
  
Stock Option Agreement with Richard Hoesterey
10.38 (6)
  
Stock Option Agreement with Evan Hughes
10.39 (6)
  
Stock Option Agreement with Eric Ladd
10.40 (6)
  
Stock Option Agreement with Jenny Ligums
10.41 (6)
  
Stock Option Agreement with James Longaker
10.42 (6)
  
Stock Option Agreement with Eric Melvin
10.43 (6)
  
Stock Option Agreement with John Patton
10.44 (6)
  
Stock Option Agreement with Kevin Shurtleff
10.45 (7)
  
Consulting Agreement with Ken Pearson
10.46 (7)
  
Consulting Agreement with Jonathan Godshall
10.47 (8)
  
Form of Warrant Agreement for the April 13, 2006 private offering
10.48 (8)
  
Form of Warrant Agreement for the Boru and Jelco issuances
10.49 (8)
  
Resignation Letter of Thomas Samson
10.50 (9)
  
Revised Consulting Agreement with Boru Enterprises, Inc.
10.51 (10)
  
Employment Agreement dated August 7, 2006 with Jonathan Godshall.
10.52 (10)
  
Promissory Note dated August 9, 2006 made by Trulite in favor of Contango Venture Capital Corporation, LLC
10.53 (10)
  
Promissory Note dated August 9, 2006 made by Trulite in favor of Standard Renewable Energy Group, L.P.
10.54 (14)
  
Stock Option Agreement with Contango Capital Partners, LP
10.55 (14)
  
Stock Option Agreement with John Berger (May 2006)
10.56 (11)
  
Promissory Note dated September 21, 2006 made by Trulite in favor of Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC
10.57 (3)
  
Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2007 with Kenneth Pearson.
 
28

Number
  
Description
10.58 (12)
  
Promissory Note, dated October 26, 2006, made by Trulite, Inc., in favor of Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC
10.59 (12)
  
Promissory Note, dated November 28, 2006, made by Trulite, Inc., in favor of Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC
10.60 (12)
  
Promissory Note, dated November 22, 2006, made by Trulite, Inc., in favor of Contango Venture Capital Corporation
10.61(15)
  
Promissory Note dated February 6, 2007, made by Trulite in favor of Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC
10.62(15)
  
Promissory Note dated February 6, 2007, made by Trulite in favor of Contango Venture Capital Corporation
10.63(16)
  
Consulting Agreement, dated April 4, 2007, by and between Trulite and Fenway Advisory Group
10.64(16)
  
Form of Warrant Agreement issued to Fenway Advisory Group
10.65(16)
  
Subscription Agreement, dated April 5, 2006, by and between Trulite, Inc. and Standard Renewable Energy Group, LP
10.66(16)
  
Subscription Agreement, dated April 5, 2006, by and between Trulite, Inc. and Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC
10.67(16)
  
Subscription Agreement, dated April 5, 2006, by and between Trulite, Inc. and Contango Venture Capital Corporation
10.68(16)
  
Form of Amendment to Warrant
10.69(17)
  
Amendment to Subscription Agreement, dated April 24, 2006, by and between Trulite, Inc. and Standard Renewable Energy Group, LP
10.70(17)
  
Amendment to Subscription Agreement, dated April 24, 2006, by and between Trulite, Inc. and Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC
10.71(17)
  
Amendment to Subscription Agreement, dated April 24, 2006, by and between Trulite, Inc. and Contango Venture Capital Corporation
10.72A(17)
  
Stockholder Lock-Up Agreement with Andrew J. Nielsen
10.72B(18)
  
Promissory Note dated May 30, 2007, made by Trulite in favor of Contango Venture Capital Corporation
10.73(18)
  
Promissory Note dated May 31, 2007, made by Trulite in favor of Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC
10.74(19)
  
Form of Convertible Promissory Note
10.75(19)
  
Form of Warrant
10.76(19)
  
Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 2007
10.76A(20)
  
Agreement, dated July 10, 2007 between Trulite, Inc. and HPC Capital Management
10.76B(21)
  
Amendment To Promissory Note, dated June 29, 2007, made by Trulite, Inc., in favor of Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC.
10.76C(21)
  
Amendment To Promissory Note, dated June 29, 2007, made by Trulite, Inc., in favor of Contango Venture Capital Corporation. 
10.77(21)
  
Amendment To Promissory Note, dated June 29, 2007, made by Trulite, Inc., in favor of Standard Renewable Energy, LP.
10.78(21)
  
Second Amendment To Subscription Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, made by Trulite, Inc., in favor of Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC.
10.79(21)
  
Second Amendment To Subscription Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, made by Trulite, Inc., in favor of Contango Venture Capital Corporation.
10.80(21)
  
Second Amendment To Subscription Agreement, dated June 29, 2007, made by Trulite, Inc., in favor of Standard Renewable Energy, LP.
10.81(22)
  
Promissory Note, dated August 20, 2007, made by Trulite, Inc., in favor of Contango Venture Capital Corporation.
10.82(22)
  
Promissory Note, dated August 20, 2007, made by Trulite, Inc., in favor of Standard Renewable Energy Group, LLC.
10.83(23)
  
Form of Promissory Note
10.84(23)
  
Form of Warrant
10.85(23)
  
Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated November 7, 2007
10.86(24)
  
Third Amendment to Subscription Agreement - SRE, LP
10.87(24)
  
Third Amendment to Subscription Agreement - SREG
10.88(24)
  
Third Amendment to Subscription Agreement - CVCC
10.89(24)
  
November 26, 2007 Subscription Agreement - SREG
10.90(24)
  
November 26, 2007 Subscription Agreement - CVCC
10.91(24)
  
SREG Common Stock Purchase Agreement
10.92(24)
  
Form of April 13, 2006 Warrants, as Amended
 
29
 
Number
  
Description
10.93(24)
  
Form of April 26, 2006 Warrants, as Amended
10.94(24)
  
Form of April 19, 2007 Warrants, as Amended
     
31.1(25)
  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2(25)
  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1(25)
  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2(25)
  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
(1)
Previously filed as an exhibit to Form 10-SB, filed December 23, 2005
(2)
Previously filed as an exhibit to Form SB-2, filed June 6, 2006
(3)
Previously filed as an exhibit to Form SB-2/A, filed January 30,2007
(4)
Previously filed as an exhibit to Form 10-SB/A, filed February 23, 2006
(5)
Previously filed as an exhibit to Form 10-SB/A, filed April 21, 2006
(6)
Previously filed as an exhibit to Form 10-SB/A, filed June 8, 2006
(7)
Previously filed as an exhibit to Form 10-SB/A, filed July 7, 2006
(8)
Previously filed as an exhibit to Form 10-SB/A, filed July 28, 2006
(9)
Previously filed as an exhibit to Form 10-SB/A, filed October 6, 2006
(10)
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 7, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference
(11)
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 19, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference
(12)
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 26, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference
(13)
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference
Previously filed as an exhibit to Form 10-SB/A, filed December 22, 2006
(15)
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated January 1, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
(16)
Previously filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form SB-2/A, filed April 6, 2007
(17)
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 23, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
(18)`
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
(19)
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated June 26, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
(20)
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 10, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
(21)
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
(22)
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 20, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
(23)
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated November 7, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
(24)
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated November 26, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference
(25)
Filed herewith
 
30
 
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: March 31, 2008
 TRULITE, INC.
     
 
By:
/s/ Jonathan Godshall
   
Jonathan Godshall
   
 Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
/s/ Jonathan Godshall Director and Chief Executive Officer March 31, 2008
Jonathan Godshall (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/ G. Wade Stubblefield
 Chief Financial Officer March 31, 2008
G. Wade Stubblefield (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/ John Berger
 Chairman of the Board of Directors March 31, 2008
John Berger    
     
/s/ Richard Hoesterey
 Director March 31, 2008
Richard Hoesterey
    
     
/s/ General Randolph House Director  March 31, 2008
General Randolph House
    
     
/s/ W. Kyle Willis Director March 31, 2008
W. Kyle Willis
    
     
/s/ John Sifonis Director  March 31, 2008
John Sifonis    
     
/s/ John White  Director March 31, 2008 
John White    
 
 
31