UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
FOR THE
TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
TO
Commission
File Number: 001-34058
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(Exact
Name Of Registrant As Specified In Its Charter)
Delaware
|
88-0363465
|
(State
of Incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
4
West 4th Ave.,
Suite 400, San Mateo, CA 94402
(Address
of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(650)
458-2670
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Not
Applicable
(Former name, former address and former
fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes x No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to submit and post such files). ¨ Yes ¨ No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
|
|
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨ (Do not check if
a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of
November 12, 2009, there were 27,061,562 shares of common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, of Nile Therapeutics, Inc. issued and
outstanding.
Index
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
PART I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
3
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Balance Sheets (unaudited)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Statements of Operations (unaudited)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
7
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
17
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
23
|
|
|
|
Item 4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
23
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
25
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
25
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
25
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
25
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
26
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
26
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
26
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Index
|
|
PART
I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements.
|
NILE
THERAPUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September 30, 2009
(unaudited)
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
4,224,183 |
|
|
$ |
5,500,790 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
331,693 |
|
|
|
544,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
4,555,876 |
|
|
|
6,045,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
31,871 |
|
|
|
73,699 |
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
|
|
132,542 |
|
|
|
209,549 |
|
Other
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
109,066 |
|
|
|
106,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
4,829,355 |
|
|
$ |
6,435,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
305,620 |
|
|
$ |
738,895 |
|
Accrued expenses
and other current liabilities
|
|
|
457,628 |
|
|
|
586,256 |
|
Due
to related parties
|
|
|
81,661 |
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
844,909 |
|
|
|
1,331,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized,none issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized,27,001,871 and
24,149,405 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
27,002 |
|
|
|
24,150 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
36,290,428 |
|
|
|
31,105,874 |
|
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
|
|
(32,332,984 |
) |
|
|
(26,026,406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
3,984,446 |
|
|
|
5,103,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$ |
4,829,355 |
|
|
$ |
6,435,469 |
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
NILE
THERAPUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
|
|
Three
months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Period
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 (inception)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
through September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
income
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
482,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
1,149,232 |
|
|
|
2,556,900 |
|
|
|
3,577,264 |
|
|
|
7,423,738 |
|
|
|
20,888,784 |
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
869,143 |
|
|
|
818,761 |
|
|
|
2,729,300 |
|
|
|
2,977,263 |
|
|
|
11,308,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
2,018,375 |
|
|
|
3,375,661 |
|
|
|
6,306,564 |
|
|
|
10,401,001 |
|
|
|
32,197,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(2,018,375 |
) |
|
|
(3,375,661 |
) |
|
|
(6,306,564 |
) |
|
|
(10,401,001 |
) |
|
|
(31,715,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
15,194 |
|
|
|
58,451 |
|
|
|
35,767 |
|
|
|
290,734 |
|
|
|
756,155 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
(1,273,734 |
) |
Other
expense
|
|
|
(24,499 |
) |
|
|
(3,679 |
) |
|
|
(35,781 |
) |
|
|
(46,523 |
) |
|
|
(99,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other (expense) income
|
|
|
(9,305 |
) |
|
|
54,772 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
244,074 |
|
|
|
(617,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(2,027,680 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,320,889 |
) |
|
|
(6,306,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,156,927 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,332,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding
|
|
|
26,491,211 |
|
|
|
24,149,405 |
|
|
|
24,930,007 |
|
|
|
24,118,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
PERIOD
FROM AUGUST 1, 2005 (DATE OF INCEPTION) TO SEPTMEBER 30, 2009
(unaudited)
|
|
COMMON STOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFICIT
ACCUMULATED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES
|
|
|
AMOUNT
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
|
|
DURING THE
DEVELOPMENT
STAGE
|
|
|
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
Issuance
of common shares to founders
|
|
|
13,794,132 |
|
|
$ |
13,794 |
|
|
$ |
(8,794 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Founders
shares returned to treasury
|
|
|
(1,379,419 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(10,043 |
) |
|
|
(10,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
12,414,713 |
|
|
|
13,794 |
|
|
|
(8,794 |
) |
|
|
(10,043 |
) |
|
|
(5,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common shares pursuant to licensing agreement
|
|
|
1,379,419 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock options for services
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,581,972 |
) |
|
|
(2,581,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
13,794,132 |
|
|
|
13,794 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
(2,592,015 |
) |
|
|
(2,576,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common shares pursuant to licensing agreement
|
|
|
63,478 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
182,172 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
182,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common shares pursuant to licensing agreement
|
|
|
350,107 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
999,650 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares sold in private placement, net of issuance costs of
$102,000
|
|
|
6,957,914 |
|
|
|
6,958 |
|
|
|
19,865,789 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,872,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
issued in connection with note conversion
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
288,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
288,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion
of notes payable upon event of merger
|
|
|
1,684,085 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
4,349,481 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,351,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
discount arising from beneficial conversion feature
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
483,463 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
483,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse
merger transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination
of accumulated deficit
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(234,218 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(234,218 |
) |
Previously
issued SMI stock
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
232,968 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
234,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,902,298 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,902,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-employee
stock-based compensaton
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,302,795 |
) |
|
|
(10,302,795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
24,099,716 |
|
|
|
24,100 |
|
|
|
28,070,642 |
|
|
|
(12,894,810 |
) |
|
|
15,199,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
issued in satisfaction of accrued liabilities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
334,992 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
334,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,436,603 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,436,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13,687 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common shares pursuant to licensing agreement
|
|
|
49,689 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
249,950 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(13,131,596 |
) |
|
|
(13,131,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
24,149,405 |
|
|
$ |
24,150 |
|
|
$ |
31,105,874 |
|
|
$ |
(26,026,406 |
) |
|
$ |
5,103,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,405,782 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,405,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
350,855 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
350,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units
sold in private placement, net of issuance costs of
$282,773
|
|
|
2,691,394 |
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
3,083,284 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,085,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
issued to placement agent in connection with private
placement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,200 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
201,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
option and warrant exercises
|
|
|
161,072 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
143,433 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
143,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(6,306,578 |
) |
|
|
(6,306,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
27,001,871 |
|
|
|
27,002 |
|
|
|
36,290,428 |
|
|
|
(32,332,984 |
) |
|
|
3,984,446 |
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
|
|
Nine months ended September
30,
|
|
|
Period
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 (inception)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
through September 30, 2009
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(6,306,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,156,927 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,332,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
129,749 |
|
|
|
83,963 |
|
|
|
270,375 |
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
1,756,637 |
|
|
|
2,447,749 |
|
|
|
7,886,286 |
|
Warrants
issued in connection with note conversion
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
288,000 |
|
Note
discount arising from beneficial conversion feature
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
483,463 |
|
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
|
|
23,569 |
|
|
|
11,654 |
|
|
|
35,223 |
|
Noncash
interest expense
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
351,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
213,141 |
|
|
|
(114,944 |
) |
|
|
(331,693 |
) |
Other
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
(2,469 |
) |
|
|
(92,109 |
) |
|
|
(109,066 |
) |
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
(433,275 |
) |
|
|
(100,251 |
) |
|
|
305,620 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(128,628 |
) |
|
|
(559,905 |
) |
|
|
457,628 |
|
Due
to related party
|
|
|
74,961 |
|
|
|
(311,092 |
) |
|
|
81,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(4,672,893 |
) |
|
|
(8,791,862 |
) |
|
|
(22,614,322 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
|
|
(4,422 |
) |
|
|
(45,314 |
) |
|
|
(126,663 |
) |
Proceeds
from sale of assets
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Cash
paid for intangible assets
|
|
|
(32,561 |
) |
|
|
(32,362 |
) |
|
|
(345,848 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(34,483 |
) |
|
|
(77,676 |
) |
|
|
(470,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of notes payable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,500,000 |
|
Repayment
of notes payable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,500,000 |
) |
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options and warrants
|
|
|
143,594 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
143,594 |
|
Proceeds
from sale of common stock to founders
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Proceeds
from sale of common stock in private placement
|
|
|
3,287,175 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
23,159,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
3,430,769 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
27,308,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,276,607 |
) |
|
|
(8,869,538 |
) |
|
|
4,224,183 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
5,500,790 |
|
|
|
16,233,464 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
4,224,183 |
|
|
$ |
7,363,926 |
|
|
$ |
4,224,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
schedule of cash flows information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
issued in sastisfaction of accrued liability
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
334,992 |
|
|
$ |
334,992 |
|
Warrants
issued to placement agent and investors, in connection
with private placement
|
|
$ |
2,872,200 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,872,200 |
|
Conversion
of notes payable and interest to common stock
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
4,351,165 |
|
Common
shares of SMI issued in reverse merger transaction
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Nile
Therapeutics, Inc. (“Nile” or the “Company”) commercially develops innovative
products for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Nile’s lead compound is
CD-NP, a chimeric natriuretic peptide currently in Phase II clinical studies for
the treatment of heart failure. The Company is also developing CU-NP, a
pre-clinical rationally designed natriuretic peptide that consists of amino acid
chains identical to those produced by the human body, specifically the ring
structure of C-type Natriuretic Peptide (“CNP”) and the N- and C-termini of
Urodilatin (“URO”).
The
Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on June 17, 1996 and
reincorporated in Delaware on February 9, 2007, at which time its name was SMI
Products, Inc. (“SMI”). On September 17, 2007, the Company completed a merger
transaction whereby Nile Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of SMI, merged with and into Nile Therapeutics, Inc., a
privately held Delaware corporation (“Old Nile”), with Old Nile becoming a
wholly-owned subsidiary of SMI. Immediately following the merger
described above, Old Nile was merged with and into the Company, with the Company
remaining as the surviving corporation to that merger. In connection with that
short-form merger, the Company changed its name to “Nile Therapeutics, Inc.”
These two merger transactions are hereinafter collectively referred to as the
“Merger.” All costs incurred in connection with the Merger have been
expensed. Upon completion of the Merger, the Company adopted Old
Nile’s business plan.
2.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (the “ASC”). The ASC has become the single
source of non-governmental accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB in the preparation of
financial statements. The ASC does not supersede the rules or regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), therefore, the rules and
interpretive releases of the SEC continue to be additional sources of GAAP for
the Company. The Company adopted the ASC as of July 1, 2009. The ASC does not
change GAAP and did not have an effect on the Company’s financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
The
Company is a development stage enterprise since it has not yet generated any
revenue from the sale of products and, through September 30, 2009, its efforts
have been principally devoted to developing its licensed technologies,
recruiting personnel, establishing office facilities, and raising capital.
Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with the provisions of ASC 915, “Development Stage Entities.”
The Company’s financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis,
which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities
and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company has experienced
net losses since its inception and has an accumulated deficit of approximately
$30.3 million at September 30, 2009. The Company expects to incur substantial
and increasing losses and have negative net cash flows from operating activities
as it expands its technology portfolio and engages in further research and
development activities, particularly the conducting of pre-clinical and clinical
trials.
The
accompanying unaudited Condensed Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q adopted under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of Nile’s management, the accompanying Condensed Financial Statements
contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and
adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The interim results for the period ended September 30, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of results for the full 2009 fiscal year or any other
future interim periods. Because the Merger was accounted for as a reverse
acquisition under generally accepted accounting principles, the financial
statements for periods prior to September 17, 2007 reflect only the
operations of Old Nile.
These
unaudited Condensed Financial Statements have been prepared by management and
should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and notes thereto
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires that management make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Estimates and assumptions principally relate to services performed by third
parties but not yet invoiced, estimates of the fair value and forfeiture rates
of stock options issued to employees and consultants, and estimates of the
probability and potential magnitude of contingent liabilities. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
Effective
June 30, 2009, the Company adopted a newly issued accounting standard related to
accounting for and disclosure of subsequent events in its financial
statements. This standard provides the authoritative guidance for subsequent
events that was previously addressed only in United States auditing
standards. This standard establishes general accounting for and disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued and requires the
Company to disclose the date through which it has evaluated subsequent events
and whether that was the date the financial statements were issued or
available to be issued. This standard does not apply to subsequent events or
transactions that are within the scope of other
applicable GAAP that provide different guidance on the accounting treatment for
subsequent events or transactions. The adoption of this standard did not have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Effective
June 30, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard issued by the FASB
related to the disclosure requirements of the fair value of financial
instruments. This standard expands the disclosure requirements of fair value
(including the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value)
of certain financial instruments to interim period financial statements that
were previously only required to be disclosed in financial statements for annual
periods. In accordance with this standard, the disclosure requirements have been
applied on a prospective basis and did not have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
3.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
On July
7, 2009 the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain
investors pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to such investors in a
private placement 2,691,394 units of its securities. Each unit included one
share of common stock and one five-year warrant to purchase a share of common
stock. See Notes 6(a), 6(b) and 8. The private placement was completed on July
15, 2009 and resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of $3,368,748 before
deducting expenses.
Cash
resources as of September 30, 2009 were $4.2 million, compared to $5.5 million
as of December 31, 2008. Based on its resources at September 30, 2009, planned
cost savings measures, and the current plan of expenditure on continuing the
development of current products, the Company believes that it has sufficient
capital to fund its operations through 2010. However, pending results of the
Company’s ongoing Phase II clinical trial of CD-NP, the Company would need
substantial additional capital in order to initiate and fund the next clinical
study of CD-NP, which is expected to be a Phase IIb clinical trial. Cost savings
implemented in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 included a significant staff
reduction and the increased use of part-time consultants. Actual cash
requirements may vary materially from those now planned because of a number of
factors, including, but not limited to, changes in the focus and direction of
research and development programs, including competitive and technical advances;
and costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and
any other intellectual property rights. If the Company is unable to
raise additional funds when needed, the Company may not be able to market its
products as planned or continue development and regulatory approval of its
products, the Company could be required to delay, scale back or eliminate some
or all research and development programs and may need to wind down the Company’s
operations altogether. Each of these alternatives would likely have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
To the
extent that the Company raises additional funds by issuing equity or convertible
debt securities, its stockholders may experience additional significant dilution
and such financing may involve restrictive covenants. To the extent
that the Company raises additional funds by issuing non-convertible debt
securities, such financing may involve restrictive covenants or other terms that
may not be favorable to the Company or its stockholders. To the extent that the
Company raises additional funds through collaboration and licensing
arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to the Company’s
technologies or its product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that may not
be favorable to it. These things may have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s business.
The
continuation of the Company’s business beyond 2010 is dependent upon obtaining
further long-term financing, the successful development of its drug product
candidates and related technologies, the successful and sufficient market
acceptance of any product offerings that the Company may introduce, and,
finally, the achievement of a profitable level of operations. The issuance of
additional equity securities by the Company may result in a significant
dilution in the equity interests of current stockholders. Obtaining commercial
loans, assuming those loans would be available, including on acceptable terms,
will increase the Company’s liabilities and future cash
commitments.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
4.
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing the loss available to common shareholders
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per
share is computed similarly to basic loss per share except that the denominator
is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have
been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the
additional common shares were dilutive.
For all
periods presented, potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the
computation of fully diluted loss per share as their effect is
anti-dilutive.
Potentially
dilutive securities include:
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
Warrants
to purchase common stock
|
|
|
3,279,984 |
|
|
|
375,289 |
|
Options
to purchase common stock
|
|
|
5,264,644 |
|
|
|
4,376,479 |
|
Total
potentially dilutive securities
|
|
|
8,544,628 |
|
|
|
4,751,768 |
|
5.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Patents
At
September 30, 2009, intangible assets consisted of patents and patent
applications acquired from third parties for the CD-NP and CU-NP compounds.
Amortization expense was $20,619 and $24,496 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, $109,568 and $67,314 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. There was a onetime
charge of $48,500 in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 for the impairment
of patents and patent applications associated with 2NTX-99. Amortization expense
of $213,307 has been recorded for the period from August 1, 2005 (inception)
through September 30, 2009.
License
Agreements
CD-NP
On
January 20, 2006, the Company entered into an exclusive, worldwide,
royalty-bearing license agreement, or the CD-NP License Agreement, with Mayo
Foundation for Medical Education and Research (“Mayo”) for the rights to issued
patents, patent applications and know-how relating to the use of CD-NP in all
therapeutic uses. The Company was also entitled to rights to
improvements to CD-NP that arise out of the laboratory of Dr. John Burnett, the
co-inventor of CD-NP, until January 19, 2009.
Under the
terms of the CD-NP License Agreement, the Company paid Mayo an up-front cash
payment and reimbursed it for past patent expenses. The Company
issued to Mayo 1,379,419 shares of common stock. Additionally, the Company
agreed to make contingent cash payments up to an aggregate of $31.9 million
upon successful completion of specified clinical and regulatory milestones
relating to CD-NP. This aggregate amount is subject to increase upon the receipt
of regulatory approval for each additional indication of CD-NP as well as for
additional compounds or analogues contained in the intellectual
property. In July 2008, the Company made a milestone payment of $400,000 to
Mayo upon the dosing of the first patient in a Phase II
trial. Pursuant to the CD-NP License Agreement, the Company will
pay Mayo an annual maintenance fee and a percentage of net sales of licensed
products, as well as $50,000 per year for the consulting services of Dr.
Burnett while serving as chairman of the Company’s Scientific Advisory
Board.
In
addition to the potential milestone payments discussed above, the CD-NP License
Agreement requires the Company to issue shares of common stock to Mayo for an
equivalent dollar amount of grants received in excess of $300,000, but not to
exceed $575,000. For the period from August 1, 2005 (inception)
through September 30, 2009, the Company received $482,235 in grant income for
which it has issued to Mayo 63,478 shares (representing $182,236) of common
stock.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The CD-NP
License Agreement, unless earlier terminated, will continue in full force and
effect until January 20, 2026. However, to the extent any patent
covered by the license is issued with an expiration date beyond January 20,
2026, the term of the agreement will continue until such expiration
date. Mayo may terminate the agreement earlier (i) for our material
breach of the agreement that remains uncured after 90 days’ written notice to
us, (ii) our insolvency or bankruptcy, or (iii) if we challenge the validity or
enforceability of any of the patents in any manner. We may terminate
the agreement without cause upon 90 days’ written notice.
CU-NP
On June
13, 2008, the Company entered into an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing
license agreement, or the CU-NP License Agreement, with Mayo for the rights to
intellectual property and to develop commercially CU-NP for all therapeutic
indications. The Company also holds the rights to improvements to CU-NP that
arise out of the laboratory of Dr. John Burnett and Dr. Candace Lee, the
inventors of CU-NP, until June 12, 2011.
Under the
terms of the CU-NP License Agreement, the Company made an up-front cash payment
to Mayo and agreed to make future contingent cash payments up to an
aggregate of $24.3 million upon achievement of specific clinical and regulatory
milestones relating to CU-NP, including a milestone payment due in connection
with the initiation of the first Phase II clinical trial of the licensed
product. This aggregate amount of $24.25 million is subject to increase upon the
receipt of regulatory approval for each additional indication of CU-NP, as well
as for additional compounds or analogues contained in the intellectual
property.
Pursuant to the agreement, the Company must also pay Mayo an annual maintenance
fee and a percentage of net sales of licensed products.
In
addition to these cash payments payable with respect to the CU-NP License
Agreement, the Company also agreed to issue shares of our common stock and
warrants to Mayo. In June 2008, the Company issued 49,689 shares of common stock
to Mayo having a fair market value as of June 13, 2008 equal to $250,000. This
amount has been recorded in research and development expenses in the
accompanying Condensed Statements of Operations. Additionally, Dr. Burnett has
applied for funding through Mayo’s Discovery-Translation Program. In the event
Dr. Burnett is awarded funding through this program, and the funding is used for
the development of the licensed product based on the patent applications, the
Company agreed to grant to Mayo an equivalent dollar value in warrants to
purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares purchasable
under these warrants will be calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model and the warrants will include a cashless exercise provision with language
to be negotiated in good faith between the parties.
The CU-NP
License Agreement, unless earlier terminated, will continue in full force and
effect until June 13, 2028. However, to the extent any patent covered
by the license is issued with an expiration date beyond June 13, 2028, the term
of the agreement will continue until such expiration date. Mayo may terminate
the agreement earlier (i) for our material breach of the agreement that remains
uncured after 90 days’ written notice to us, (ii) our insolvency or bankruptcy,
(iii) if we challenge the validity or enforceability of any of the patents in
any manner, or (iv) or upon receipt of notice from the Company that we have
terminated all development efforts under the agreement. We may terminate the
agreement without cause upon 90 days’ written notice.
2NTX-99
On August
6, 2007, the Company entered into an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing
license agreement, or the 2NTX-99 License Agreement, with Dr. Cesare Casagrande
for the rights to the intellectual property and know-how relating to 2NTX-99,
and all of its human therapeutic or veterinary uses. Under the
2NTX-99 License Agreement, the Company made an up-front cash payment to Dr.
Casagrande and reimbursed him for past patent expenses. The Company
also issued to Dr. Casagrande 350,107 shares of common stock. In January 2009,
the Company determined to discontinue the 2NTX-99 program so that it could focus
its resources on the development of its natriuretic peptide franchise, including
CD-NP which is in Phase II development for acute heart failure, and CU-NP which
is a pre-clinical compound. Accordingly, the Company terminated the
2NTX-99 License Agreement, returning the rights to the molecule to Dr.
Casagrande, effective April 16, 2009. As such, the Company recorded an
impairment charge of $48,500 for unamortized patent costs, which is included in
research and development expense in the accompanying Condensed Statements of
Operations.
6.
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(a)
Common Stock
In August
2005, the Company issued an aggregate of 13,794,132 shares of common stock to
its founders for $5,000. The founders subsequently returned 1,379,419
of these shares to the Company for issuance to Mayo. In January 2006 the Company
issued 1,379,419 shares of common stock to Mayo, pursuant to the terms of the
Mayo Licensing Agreement. The fair value of these shares of $500 was recorded as
stock-based compensation and is included in research and development expense in
the accompanying Condensed Statements of Operations.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In August
2007, pursuant to the terms of the 2NTX-99 License Agreement, the Company issued
350,107 shares of common stock to Dr. Casagrande. The fair value of the shares
was $1,000,000 and was recorded as research and development expense in the
accompanying Condensed Statements of Operations.
In
September 2007, also pursuant to the terms of the CD-NP License Agreement, the
Company issued 63,478 shares of common stock to Mayo. The fair value of the
shares, $182,236, was recorded as research and development expense in the
accompanying Statements of Operations.
As a
condition to the closing of the Merger, on September 11, 2007, Old Nile
completed a financing whereby it received gross proceeds of $19,974,747 through
the sale of 6,957,914 shares of common stock in a private placement to certain
qualified investors. Issuance costs related to the financing were $102,000.
Contemporaneously with the financing, the Company converted $4,351,165 of
convertible debt and interest into 1,684,085 shares of common
stock.
In June
2008, pursuant to the CU-NP License Agreement, the Company issued 49,689 shares
of common stock to Mayo. The fair value of the shares on June 13, 2008 was
$250,000 and was recorded as research and development expense in the
accompanying Condensed Statements of Operations.
1,250,000
shares of common stock that were held by the original stockholders of SMI prior
to the Merger are reflected in the Company’s common stock outstanding in the
accompanying Condensed Balance Sheets.
On July
7, 2009, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain
qualified investors pursuant to which it agreed to sell 2,691,394 units of its
securities in a private placement in exchange for an aggregate gross purchase
price of $3,368,748. Each unit included one share of common stock and one
warrant to purchase a share of common stock. See Note 6(b). Issuance costs
related to the financing were $282,773, including the issuance of warrants
(“Placement Warrants”) to purchase 218,300 shares of common stock to designees
of Riverbank Capital Securities, Inc. (“Riverbank”), a FINRA member broker
dealer that acted as placement agent for the Company in connection with the
private placement. See Note 8. The issuance and sale of
the units pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement was completed on July
15, 2009.
The
Company agreed to file a registration statement with the SEC in order to
register the resale of the shares of common stock, including shares of common
stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of warrants and Placement Warrants,
issued in the private placement. In the event the Company did not
file the registration statement within 60 days following the closing of the
financing, the Company agreed to pay liquidated damages to the investors in the
amount of 1% of such investor’s aggregate investment amount each month until the
registration statement is filed. The Company filed such registration
statement with the SEC on August 13, 2009.
(b)
Warrants
In
conjunction with the conversion of $4,351,165 of convertible debt prior to the
Merger, the Company issued fully vested warrants to purchase 168,337 shares of
common stock to the holders of such debt. The warrants were issued with an
exercise price of $2.71 and expire in September 2012. The fair value of the
warrants was determined to be $288,000. None of these warrants have been
exercised to date.
In 2007,
as consideration for the performance of consulting and due diligence efforts
related to the licensing of 2NTX-99, the Company granted and accrued for fully
vested warrants to purchase 206,912 shares of its common stock. The warrants
were valued at $334,992 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the
following assumptions: an exercise price of $2.71, a 4.02% risk-free interest
rate, a 5 year contractual term, a dividend rate of 0%, and 68% expected
volatility. Of the total warrants granted, 137,567 warrants with an aggregate
value of $222,770 were granted to employees of Two River Group Holdings, LLC
(“Two River”), a related party, and its affiliates. See Note 8. The remaining
warrants were granted to outside consultants. The warrants were recorded as an
expense and a liability during the year ended December 31, 2007. In March
2008, these warrants were issued in satisfaction of the accrued
liability.
In
connection with its July 2009 private placement, as discussed in Note 3, the
Company issued 2,691,394 shares of common stock and five-year warrants to
purchase an additional 2,691,394 shares of common stock. The warrants were
issued in three separate tranches, as follows:
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
·
|
Warrants
to purchase 672,849 shares, representing 25% of the total warrant shares
issued to investors, have an exercise price equal to $1.25, which
represents 110% of the $1.14 consolidated closing bid price of the
Company’s common stock on July 7, 2009 (the “Closing Bid
Price”);
|
|
·
|
Warrants
to purchase 672,848 shares, representing 25% of the total warrant shares
issued to investors, have an exercise price equal to $1.71, which
represents 150% of the Closing Bid Price;
and
|
|
·
|
Warrants
to purchase 1,345,697 shares, representing 50% of the total warrant shares
issued to investors, have an exercise price equal to $2.28, which
represents 200% of the Closing Bid
Price.
|
The three
tranches of warrants were all valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model and the following assumptions: an exercise price of $1.25, $1.71 or $2.28,
a 2.50% risk-free interest rate, a 5 year contractual term, a dividend rate of
0%, and 119% expected volatility. The $1.25, $1.71 and $2.28 tranches
were valued at $698,000, $674,000 and $1,299,000, respectively, for a total
value of $2,671,000.
The
warrants issued to investors in the July 2009 private placement are redeemable
by the Company, at a redemption price of $0.001 per warrant share, upon 30 days’
notice, if at any time, the volume weighted average price of the common shares
for any 20 consecutive business days is equal to or greater than 200% of the
exercise price of each warrant.
As
consideration for its services as placement agent in connection with the July
2009 private placement, the Company also issued to designees of Riverbank
five-year warrants to purchase 218,300 shares of common stock at a price of
$1.375 per share. These warrants have an aggregate fair-value of
$201,200. See Note 8.
7.
STOCK OPTION PLAN
The
Company’s Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) was initially
adopted by the Board of Directors on August 10, 2005. The Plan authorized a
total of 2,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance. On September 17,
2007, pursuant to the Merger, the Plan was amended and each share of common
stock then subject to the Plan was substituted with 2.758838 shares of common
stock, resulting in an aggregate of 5,517,676 shares available under the Plan.
Under the Plan, incentives may be granted to officers, employees, directors,
consultants, and advisors. Incentives under the Plan may be granted in any one
or a combination of the following forms: (a) incentive stock options and
non-statutory stock options, (b) stock appreciation rights, (c) stock awards,
(d) restricted stock and (e) performance shares.
The Plan
is administered by the Board of Directors, or a committee appointed by the
Board, which determines the recipients and types of awards to be granted, as
well as the number of shares subject to the awards, the exercise price and the
vesting schedule. The term of stock options granted under the Plan cannot exceed
ten years. Currently, stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to
closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, and generally
vest over a period of three to five years.
A summary of the status of the options
issued under the Plan at September 30, 2009, and information with respect to the
changes in options outstanding is as follows:
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Options
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
for
Grant
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
5,310,766 |
|
|
|
206,910 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options
granted under the plan
|
|
|
(2,802,329 |
) |
|
|
2,802,329 |
|
|
$ |
2.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options
forfeited
|
|
|
96,558 |
|
|
|
(96,558 |
) |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,604,995 |
|
|
|
2,912,681 |
|
|
$ |
2.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options
granted under the plan
|
|
|
(1,152,588 |
) |
|
|
1,152,588 |
|
|
$ |
4.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options
forfeited
|
|
|
87,500 |
|
|
|
(87,500 |
) |
|
$ |
4.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,539,907 |
|
|
|
3,977,769 |
|
|
$ |
3.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options
granted under the plan
|
|
|
(2,015,148 |
) |
|
|
2,015,148 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options
forfeited
|
|
|
1,165,951 |
|
|
|
(1,165,951 |
) |
|
$ |
3.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options
exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(156,072 |
) |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
690,710 |
|
|
|
4,670,894 |
|
|
$ |
2.29 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,597,626 |
|
|
$ |
2.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award
and is recognized as expense over the required service period, which is
generally equal to the vesting period.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company granted options in exchange
for accrued performance cash bonuses (“Cash Bonus Options”). Employees received
a certain amount of options in exchange for up to 50% of their accrued
performance cash bonus. The Company estimated the fair value of these options to
be equal to the amount of cash bonus exchanged for the options divided by the
number of options granted. The options were 100% vested on the date of the
grant, January 16, 2009. In addition, employees were given the option of
exchanging the remaining 50% of their performance cash bonus for 50% more
options than were exchanged for the first 50% of their performance cash bonus.
An additional $23,293 in compensation costs was expensed in the first quarter as
a result of this incremental incentive to preserve the Company’s
cash.
Excluding
Cash Bonus Options, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company
estimated the fair value of each option award granted to employees using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
117%
to 123%
|
|
75%
to 89%
|
Expected
term
|
|
3
years
|
|
5.75
to 6.25 years
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
Risk-free
interest rates
|
|
1.4%
to 1.7%
|
|
2.0%
to
3.4%
|
Due to the Company’s
short period of publicly traded stock history, management’s estimate of expected
volatility is based on the average expected volatilities of a sampling of five
companies with similar attributes to the Company, including: industry, stage of
life cycle, size and financial leverage.
Share-based
compensation is recognized only for those awards that are ultimately expected to
vest, therefore, the Company has applied an estimated forfeiture rate to
unvested awards for the purpose of calculating compensation cost. These
estimates will be revised, if necessary, in future periods if actual forfeitures
differ from estimates. Changes in forfeiture estimates impact compensation cost
in the period in which the change in estimate occurs.
Employee
stock-based compensation costs for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 and for the cumulative period from August 1, 2005 (inception)
through September 30, 2009 are as follows:
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Three
months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Period
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 (inception)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
through September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
$ |
433,213 |
|
|
$ |
168,861 |
|
|
$ |
1,193,413 |
|
|
$ |
1,456,550 |
|
|
$ |
5,046,463 |
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
112,158 |
|
|
|
455,368 |
|
|
|
94,617 |
|
|
|
351,824 |
|
|
|
705,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
545,371 |
|
|
$ |
624,229 |
|
|
$ |
1,288,030 |
|
|
$ |
1,808,374 |
|
|
$ |
5,751,508 |
|
The fair
value of shares vested under the Plan for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the period from August 1, 2005 through
September 30, 2009 were $466,301, $2,284,390, $359,412, $1,564,555 and
$4,501,262, respectively.
Certain
employees have been granted performance-based stock options that are subject to
forfeiture based on the failure to achieve specified goals. The Company analyzed
two years of annual performance measurements, and, based on that analysis,
decided to estimate forfeiture rates on performance-based stock options for
future periods. For the cumulative period from August 1, 2005 (inception)
through September 30, 2009, employees forfeited 302,214 shares related to
performance-based options, which had a fair value of $560,798. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, employment stock options and performance-based
stock options relating to 894,271 shares, which had a fair value of $2,182,485,
were forfeited as a result of the corporate lay-offs. Based on the forfeiture
rates of the performance-based stock options, the Company estimates that options
relating to an additional 73,803 shares of common stock will be forfeited in the
future. This estimated compensation cost of these forfeited shares is
$161,249.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, in accordance with the terms of the
separation agreements of certain former employees, the Company agreed to extend
to December 31, 2009 the exercise period relating to vested stock options held
by those employees. In total, stock options relating to 177,049 shares of common
stock with a weighted average exercise price of $2.93 were affected by such
extension. No additional stock-option compensation expense was required to be
recorded as a result of the extended exercise period based on the Company’s
analysis of modifications made to the stock option grants.
In
addition, pursuant to the terms of a separation agreement of a former executive
dated June 10, 2009, the Company accelerated the vesting of 329,857 shares
subject to a stock option, resulting in additional stock compensation expense of
approximately $676,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Company
also agreed to extend to June 10, 2014 the exercise period relating to the
vested stock options owned by the former executive. This extended exercise
period did not result in any incremental stock compensation cost required to be
recorded. In total, the former executive has stock options to purchase 1,381,202
shares of common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $2.51 per
share.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, in accordance with the terms of a
separation agreement with a former member of the Company’s Board of Directors,
the Company accelerated the vesting of 123,334 shares subject to a stock option,
resulting in additional compensation expense of approximately
$159,515.
At
September 30, 2009, total unrecognized estimated employee (including directors)
compensation cost related to stock options granted prior to that date was
$1,750,705, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting
period of 1.3 years. This unrecognized estimated employee compensation cost does
not include $161,249 in management estimated forfeitures of performance-based
stock options.
Common
stock, stock options or other equity instruments issued to non-employees
(including consultants and all members of the Company’s Scientific Advisory
Board) as consideration for goods or services received by the Company are
accounted for based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued (unless
the fair value of the consideration received can be more reliably measured). The
fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model and is periodically remeasured as the underlying options
vest. The fair value of any options issued to non-employees is
recorded as expense over the applicable service periods.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On June
24, 2009, in conjunction with a services agreement, the Company issued to named
employees of Two River Consulting, LLC (“TRC”) stock options to purchase 187,500
shares of common stock that vested on issuance and have a fair-value of
$116,309; and stock options to purchase 562,500 shares that vest based on the
achievement of certain milestones and have an estimated fair-value of $363,028.
TRC is an entity controlled by two of the Company’s officers and
directors. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company
recorded an expense of $326,563 related to these options and will record
additional expense in the future as the remaining options are expected to
vest.
Stock-based
compensation costs incurred for services by non-employees for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and for the cumulative period from
August 1, 2005 (inception) through September 30, 2009 totaled $222,483,
$350,856, $(2,654), $54,383, and $367,209, respectively. These amounts
were included in research and development expense in the accompanying Condensed
Statements of Operations.
In
addition to the options issued under the Plan, in September 2007 the Company
issued fully vested options to purchase 593,750 shares outside of the Plan to a
former executive of the Company pursuant to his separation agreement. The
options were issued at an exercise price of $2.71 per share.
8.
RELATED PARTIES
On
occasion, some of the Company’s expenses are paid by Two River Group Holdings,
LLC (“Two River”), a company owned by three of the Company’s directors and
founders. No interest is charged by Two River on any outstanding balance owed by
the Company. For the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for
the period from August 1, 2005 (inception) through September 30, 2009,
reimbursable expenses totaled $7,825, $4,112 and
$181,174, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, reimbursable expenses totaled $26,374 and $14,094, respectively.
In addition, during 2007 the Company paid $70,245 to Two River for consulting
and due diligence efforts performed by Two River employees related to the
licensing of 2NTX-99. As of September 30, 2009 the Company has a payable to Two
River of $7,826.
As
consideration for the performance of consulting and due diligence efforts
related to the licensing of 2NTX-99, the Company issued fully vested warrants to
purchase 206,912 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of
$2.71. Of the total issued, warrants to purchase 137,567 shares were
issued to employees of Two River. The remaining warrants were granted to outside
consultants. The warrants were recorded as an expense and a liability during the
year ended December 31, 2007. In March 2008, these warrants were issued in
satisfaction of the accrued liability.
On June
24, 2009, the Company entered into a services agreement with TRC to provide
various clinical development, operational and administrative services to the
Company for a period of one year. Joshua A. Kazam, the Company’s
President and Chief Executive Officer and director, and Arie S. Belldegrun, who
was appointed to serve as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors on
September 24, 2009, are each partners of TRC. David M. Tanen, who
served as the Company’s Secretary and director until his resignation from both
positions on September 24, 2009, is also a partner of TRC. The terms of the
Services Agreement were reviewed and approved by a special committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors consisting of independent
directors. None of the members of the special committee has any
interest in TRC or the services agreement. As compensation for the
services contemplated by the services agreement, the Company will pay to TRC a
monthly cash fee of $65,000 and issued stock options to purchase up to an
aggregate of 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price per share
equal to $0.89, the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on June 24,
2009. The total estimated fair-value of the option shares is
$479,338.Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the stock option vested
immediately and the remaining 75% vest pursuant to the achievement of certain
milestones relating to the clinical development of CD-NP. On
occasion, some of the Company’s expenses are paid by TRC. No interest is charged
by TRC on any outstanding balance owed by the Company. For the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the period from August 1, 2005
(inception) through September 30, 2009, reimbursable expenses totaled
$8,685, $0 and $8,685, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, reimbursable expenses totaled $8,685
and $0, respectively. As of September 30, 2009 the Company has a
payable to TRC of $73,685.
As
discussed in Notes 6(a) and 6(b), pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement
dated July 7, 2009 between the Company and certain qualified investors
identified therein, the Company sold 2,691,394 units of its securities resulting
in gross proceeds of $3,368,748. The sale of the units was completed
on July 15, 2009. The Company engaged Riverbank Capital Securities, Inc.
(“Riverbank”) to serve as its placement agent. Riverbank was not paid a cash
commission for its services, however, the Company issued Riverbank (or its
designees) five-year warrants to purchase 218,300 shares of the Company’s common
stock. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $1.375 per share, which is
equal to 110% of the per unit purchase price paid by investors, and have a
cashless (net) exercise provision. The Company also paid Riverbank an
expense allowance of $50,000 to cover expenses incurred during the
financing.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Peter M.
Kash, the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors, Joshua A. Kazam, the
Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and director, and David M.Tanen,
a director of the Company until September 24, 2009, are each officers of and
collectively control Riverbank. In light of the relationship between Messrs.
Kash, Kazam and Tanen and Riverbank, the selection and terms of the engagement
were reviewed and approved by a special committee of the Company’s Board
consisting of independent directors, none of whom had any interest or other
relationship in Riverbank or its affiliates.
9.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The
Company relocated its principal offices effective April 1, 2008 from Berkeley,
California to San Francisco, California. The Company leased its office facility
in Berkeley, California under a non-cancelable operating lease that was due to
expire in April 2010. The total undiscounted future lease payments due
under this lease as of March 31, 2008 were approximately $162,000. The
Company recorded a loss liability of approximately $138,500, which was equal to
the total future lease payments through the end of the lease, discounted at 16%.
In June 2008, the Company entered into a lease termination and surrender of
premises agreement with the landlord, under which the Company paid $57,000 and
surrendered the $14,000 security deposit to terminate the lease.
On March
3, 2008 the Company signed a non-cancelable operating lease agreement to lease
office space in San Francisco, California. The lease expires in March 2011.
Future non-cancelable minimum lease payments under this lease are approximately
$30,000 for the remainder of 2009, $116,000 in 2010, and $29,000 in 2011, not
including annual operating cost escalations. In connection with this lease, the
Company delivered an irrevocable stand-by and unconditional letter of credit in
the amount of approximately $55,000 as a security deposit, with the landlord as
the beneficiary in case of default or failure to comply with the lease
requirements. In order to fund the letter of credit, the Company deposited a
compensating balance of approximately $55,000 into a certificate of deposit with
a financial institution which shall be restricted for the entire period of the
three-year lease agreement. Restricted cash is included in other noncurrent
assets in the accompanying Condensed Balance Sheets.
During
August 2009, the Company relocated to a smaller office space in San Mateo,
California. As of September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a loss
liability of $130,000, which was equal to the agreed upon lease termination
payment that was made in October 2009 pursuant to a lease termination agreement
with the landlord.
10.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent
to September 30, 2009, the Company entered into a lease termination agreement
for the office space in San Francisco. The Company paid $130,000 to satisfy the
remaining lease liability. The standby letter of credit that served
as a security deposit was cancelled and the corresponding restricted cash,
approximately $55,000, held by the Company will no longer be subject to
restriction.
The
Company has evaluated subsequent events through November 12, 2009, the date on
which the financial statements were issued.
Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Note
Regarding Forward Looking Statements
The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the following Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. We use words
such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,”
“predict,” “potential,” “believe,” “should” and similar expressions to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements appearing throughout our Form 10-Q
are statements regarding our intent, belief, or current expectations, primarily
regarding our operations and our efforts to develop our lead product candidate,
CD-NP. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. You should
not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only
as of the date of this Form 10-Q. Our actual results could differ materially
from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements for many reasons,
including those set forth under Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which was filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2009. Except as required by law,
we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any
updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to
reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in
events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is
based.
Overview
We are a
development stage biopharmaceutical company in the business of commercially
developing innovative products for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Our
lead compound is CD-NP, a chimeric natriuretic peptide currently in Phase II
clinical studies for the treatment of heart failure. We believe CD-NP may be
useful in several cardiovascular and renal indications. We are initially
developing CD-NP as a treatment for heart failure. We are also developing CU-NP,
a pre-clinical rationally designed natriuretic peptide that consists of amino
acid chains identical to those produced by the human body, specifically the ring
structure of CNP, and the N- and C-termini of Urodilantin, or URO.
We have
no product sales to date and we will not generate any product revenue until we
receive approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, or
equivalent foreign regulatory bodies to begin selling our pharmaceutical product
candidates. Developing pharmaceutical products is a lengthy and very expensive
process. Assuming we do not encounter any unforeseen safety issues during the
course of developing our product candidates, we do not expect to complete the
development of a product candidate for several years, if ever. To date, most of
our development expenses have related to our lead product candidate, CD-NP. As
we proceed with the clinical development of CD-NP and as we further develop
CU-NP, our second product candidate, our research and development expenses will
further increase. To the extent we are successful in acquiring additional
product candidates for our development pipeline, our need to finance further
research and development will continue increasing. Accordingly, our success
depends not only on the safety and efficacy of our product candidates, but also
on our ability to finance the development of the products. Our major sources of
working capital have been proceeds from private sales of our common stock and
debt financings.
Our
results include non-cash compensation expense as a result of the issuance of
stock, stock options, and warrants. We expense the fair value of stock options
and warrants over the vesting period. When more precise pricing data is
unavailable, we determine the fair value of stock options using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The terms and vesting schedules for
share-based awards vary by type of grant and the employment status of the
grantee. Generally, the awards vest based upon time-based or performance-based
conditions. Performance-based conditions generally include the attainment of
goals related to our financial and development performance. Stock-based
compensation expense is included in the respective categories of expense in the
statements of operations. We expect to record additional non-cash compensation
expense in the future, which may be significant.
Our Product
Candidates
We
currently have two product candidates: CD-NP, in clinical development for the
treatment of heart failure, and CU-NP which is in pre-clinical development and
has potential utility in a number of cardiovascular and renal indications. We
recently terminated our 2NTX-99 program in order to focus on our natriuretic
peptide programs.
CD-NP Program – CD-NP is a
novel chimeric natriuretic peptide in clinical development for an initial
indication of acute decompensated heart failure, or ADHF. CD-NP was rationally
designed by scientists at the Mayo Clinic’s cardio-renal research labs. Current
therapies for ADHF, including B-type natriuretic peptide, have been associated
with favorable pharmacologic effects, but have also been associated with
hypotension and decreased renal function which limit their utility in clinical
practice. CD-NP was designed to preserve the favorable effects of current
therapies while eliminating or attenuating the hypotensive response, and
enhancing or preserving renal function. In addition to an initial indication for
ADHF, CD-NP has potential utility in other indications which include
preservation of cardiac function subsequent to acute myocardial infarction, and
prevention of renal damage subsequent to cardiac surgery.
In 2007,
we completed a Phase Ia dose-escalation study in healthy volunteers to examine
the safety and pharmacodynamic effects of various doses of CD-NP. The study
placed particular emphasis on the effects of CD-NP on blood pressure and renal
function. Data from the completed Phase Ia study in healthy volunteers was
consistent with several pre-clinical findings, including that CD-NP was
associated with increased levels of plasma cGMP, a secondary messenger of the
target receptor, preserved renal function, increased natriuresis, and diuresis,
and had a minimal effect on mean arterial pressure.
In 2008,
we initiated two additional dose-escalation studies to assess the safety and
pharmacodynamic profile of CD-NP in heart failure patients. The first study was
a Phase Ib study in stable heart failure patients designed to understand the
maximum tolerated dose of the product candidate, and the second study was a
Phase IIa study in acute heart failure patients designed to better understand
the hemodynamic properties of the product candidate.
In
October 2008, we announced interim results of an ongoing Phase IIa study of
CD-NP. Results from the first cohort of patients in the study suggested that
CD-NP was associated with a statistically significant reduction in pulmonary
capillary wedge pressure, a statistically significant increase in diuresis, a
trend toward reduction in right atrial pressure, and a trend toward increase in
cardiac output at dose levels where patients did not experience symptomatic
hypotension or an observed change in serum creatinine. The study dosing was
completed at the end of 2008.
In
December 2008, we announced preliminary data from the Phase Ib study of CD-NP.
Results of this study showed that CD-NP was well tolerated at doses of up to 20
ng/kg/min, blood pressure effects were dose dependent and well characterized,
CD-NP demonstrated diuretic effects comparable to furosemide, and CD-NP produced
statistically significant changes on biomarkers consistent with enhanced renal
function.
We
believe that the cumulative final results of the Phase Ib and IIa studies
indicate that a) CD-NP was well tolerated at doses of up to 20 ng/kg/min in
stable and acute heart failure patients, b) CD-NP blood pressure effects were
dose-dependent and well characterized in chronic heart failure patients, c) in
the anticipated therapeutic dose range, CD-NP produced a statistically
significant reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, d) CD-NP
demonstrated diuretic effects alone, and CD-NP produced a statistically
significant increase in diuresis concurrent with furosemide, and e) with a 24
hour infusion, CD-NP produced statistically significant decreases in serum
creatinine and cystatin-c, consistent with enhanced renal function.
In
addition to our own studies, the Mayo Clinic initiated a Phase Ib study, under
an investigator-sponsored investigational new drug application, or IND, to
better understand CD-NP’s renal properties.
In March
2009, the FDA placed a clinical hold on the CD-NP program. The FDA requested
additional data on our Phase IIa clinical trial, which was finalized in March
2009, and modifications to CD-NP’s current Investigator Brochure or IB. We
submitted a full response to the FDA in April 2009.
On May 15
2009, the FDA released the CD-NP program from clinical hold. Shortly thereafter,
we initiated a 30-40 patient single-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II study
designed to provide additional information on the safety and tolerability of
CD-NP when infused for up to 72 hours in patients with acute heart failure and
renal function insufficiency. Additionally, the study contains several
exploratory efficacy endpoints to provide insight into the potential for CD-NP
to enhance renal function in acute heart failure patients. In July 2009, we
dosed the first patient in this Phase II study. We expect results
from the study to be available in the first half of 2010.
CU-NP Program – CU-NP is a
novel natriuretic peptide rationally designed by scientists at the Mayo Clinic’s
cardio-renal research labs. CU-NP was designed to combine the favorable
hemodynamic venodilating effects of CNP generated via NPR-B receptor agonism,
with the beneficial renal effects of Urodilatin generated via NPR-A receptor
agonism. In animal models, CU-NP was shown to increase natriuresis, diuresis,
and glomerular filtration rate in a dose dependent manner, decrease cardiac
filling pressure, and inhibit the renin-angiotensin system without inducing
significant hypotension.
In 2008,
we manufactured a supply of CU-NP. In 2009, we plan to complete additional
pharmacological studies to evaluate formulations and dose levels of CU-NP for
chronic administration, and, if feasible, to initiate pre-clinical toxicology
and manufacturing activities.
2NTX-99 Program – In January
2009, we discontinued the development of 2NTX-99 and terminated our license to
certain patents and other intellectual property relating to that product
candidate. We decided to end the 2NTX-99 program in order to focus
our resources on the development of our natriuretic peptides.
Critical Accounting Policies
and Estimates
Our
financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures. We evaluate our
estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, including research and
development and clinical trial accruals, and stock-based compensation estimates.
Our estimates are based on historical experience and various other assumptions
that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results
could differ from these estimates. We believe the following critical accounting
policies reflect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our financial statements and accompanying notes.
Research
and Development Expenses and Accruals
Research
and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel
costs, fees paid to consultants and outside service providers for pre-clinical,
clinical, and manufacturing development, legal expenses resulting from
intellectual property prosecution, contractual review, and other expenses
relating to the design, development, testing, and enhancement of our product
candidates. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Amounts due
under such arrangements may be either fixed fee or fee for service, and may
include upfront payments, monthly payments, and payments upon the completion of
milestones or receipt of deliverables.
Our cost
accruals for clinical trials and other research and development activities are
based on estimates of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to
contracts with numerous clinical trial centers and CROs, clinical study sites,
laboratories, consultants, or other clinical trial vendors that perform the
activities. Related contracts vary significantly in length, and may be for a
fixed amount, a variable amount based on actual costs incurred, capped at a
certain limit, or for a combination of these elements. Activity levels are
monitored through close communication with the CRO’s and other clinical trial
vendors, including detailed invoice and task completion review, analysis of
expenses against budgeted amounts, analysis of work performed against approved
contract budgets and payment schedules, and recognition of any changes in scope
of the services to be performed. Certain CRO and significant clinical trial
vendors provide an estimate of costs incurred but not invoiced at the end of
each quarter for each individual trial. The estimates are reviewed and discussed
with the CRO or vendor as necessary, and are included in research and
development expenses for the related period. For clinical study sites, which are
paid periodically on a per-subject basis to the institutions performing the
clinical study, we accrue an estimated amount based on subject screening and
enrollment in each quarter. All estimates may differ significantly from the
actual amount subsequently invoiced, which may occur several months after the
related services were performed.
In the
normal course of business we contract with third parties to perform various
research and development activities in the on-going development of our product
candidates. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation
and vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows.
Payments under the contracts depend on factors such as the achievement of
certain events, the successful enrollment of patients, and the completion of
portions of the clinical trial or similar conditions. The objective of our
accrual policy is to match the recording of expenses in our financial statements
to the actual services received and efforts expended. As such, expense accruals
related to clinical trials and other research and development activities are
recognized based on our estimate of the degree of completion of the event or
events specified in the specific contract.
No
adjustments for material changes in estimates have been recognized in any period
presented.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Our
results include non-cash compensation expense as a result of the issuance of
stock, stock options and warrants. We have issued stock options to employees,
directors, consultants and Scientific Advisory Board members under our Amended
and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan.
We
expense the fair value of employee stock-based compensation over the vesting
period. When more precise pricing data is unavailable, we determine the fair
value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This
valuation model requires us to make assumptions and judgments about the
variables used in the calculation. These variables and assumptions include the
weighted-average period of time that the options granted are expected to be
outstanding, the volatility of our common stock, the risk-free interest rate and
the estimated rate of forfeitures of unvested stock options. Additional
information on the variables and assumptions used in our stock-based
compensation are described in Note 10 of the accompanying notes to our
audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
Stock
options or other equity instruments to non-employees (including consultants and
all members of the Company’s Scientific Advisory Board) issued as consideration
for goods or services received by the Company are accounted for based on the
fair value of the equity instruments issued (unless the fair value of the
consideration received can be more reliably measured). The fair value of stock
options is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is
periodically remeasured as the underlying options vest. The fair value of any
options issued to non-employees is recorded as expense over the applicable
service periods.
The terms
and vesting schedules for share-based awards vary by type of grant and the
employment status of the grantee. Generally, the awards vest based upon
time-based or performance-based conditions. Performance-based conditions
generally include the attainment of goals related to our financial and
development performance. Stock-based compensation expense is included in the
respective categories of expense in the Statements of Operations. We expect to
record additional non-cash compensation expense in the future, which may be
significant.
In the
quarter ending March 31, 2009, with two years of employee performance and
forfeiture history, we began to estimate forfeitures of performance-based stock
options. Prior to December 31, 2008, we did not include an estimate for
forfeitures in our compensation expenses on a quarterly basis. Instead,
adjustments to the performance-based stock compensation expense for the full
year were made in the fourth quarter at the time of performance
assessment.
Research and Development
Plan
In July
2009, we began enrolling patients in a 30-40 patient open-label Phase II study
of CD-NP in patients with ADHF and mild to moderate renal dysfunction. Following
the completion of the ongoing Phase II study, we plan to initiate a Phase IIb
study in a large number of patients, which, if successful, would serve as the
basis for dose selection for a Phase III program. We would require substantial
additional funding to complete the Phase IIb study.
In
addition to our own studies, in July 2008, Mayo dosed the first patient in a
Phase Ib study, under an investigator-sponsored IND, to better understand
CD-NP’s renal properties. We expect Mayo to complete dosing of this trial in
2010.
For
CU-NP, we have manufactured CU-NP API and expect to initiate work on
pre-clinical pharmacology studies and chronic formulation development in
2009.
Results of
Operations
The
following analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should
be read in conjunction with our condensed financial statements and notes
contained elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
Research and Development
Expenses. Research and development expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $1.1 million and $2.6 million,
respectively. Research and development expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $3.6 million and $7.4 million,
respectively. The decrease of approximately $3.8 million in the first
nine months of 2009 over 2008 is primarily due to an approximately $1 million
decrease in clinical expenses in our CD-NP program and to an approximately $1
million reduction in expenses relating to the 2NTX-99 program. The decrease in
clinical expenses is primarily the result of having two ongoing clinical trials
in the first nine months of 2008, and having only one clinical trial ongoing in
the first nine months of 2009. The decrease in 2NTX-99 expenses is a result of
terminating the program in January 2009.
General and Administrative
Expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and related expenses for executive, finance and other administrative
personnel, recruitment expenses, professional fees and other corporate expenses,
including business development, rent and other office expense, and general legal
activities.
General
and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 were approximately $0.9 million and $0.8 million, respectively and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $2.7 million
and $3.0 million, respectively. The decrease of approximately $0.3 million in
the first nine months of the 2009 over 2008 is primarily due to an approximately
$0.3 million decrease in stock based compensation expense as a result of a
reduction in personnel.
Interest Income. Interest
income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately
$15,200 and $58,500 respectively and for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 were approximately $35,800 and $290,700,
respectively. This significant decrease in interest income over 2008
is due to lower interest rates earned on cash in bank accounts, lower cash
balances in interest bearing accounts and due to the fact that average cash
balances in 2009 have been substantially less than 2008 levels.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
and cash flow
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we had a net loss of
approximately $6.3 million and $10.2 million, respectively. From August 1, 2005
(inception) through September 30, 2009, we have incurred an aggregate net loss
of approximately $32.3 million, primarily through a combination of research and
development activities related to the licensed technologies under our control
and expenses supporting those activities. We expect to continue to
incur substantial and increasing losses, which will continue to have negative
net cash flows from operating activities as we expand our technology portfolio
and engage in further research and development activities, particularly the
conducting of pre-clinical studies and clinical trials.
Our total
cash resources as of September 30, 2009 were $4.2 million compared to $5.5
million as of December 31, 2008. As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately
$0.8 million in liabilities, and $3.7 million in net working
capital. Our forecasted average monthly cash expenditures for the
next six months are approximately $0.4 million, which is a decrease from our
average monthly expenses from the previous six months. After the next
six months, if we have completed the current clinical trial, and have not raised
additional capital, either through a financing transaction or partnership deal,
then we will further reduce our cash burn to maintain sufficient capital to fund
operations through 2010.
From
inception through September 30, 2009, we have financed our operations through
private debt and equity financing. As we have not generated any
revenue from operations to date, and we do not expect to generate revenue for
several years, if ever, we will need to raise substantial additional capital in
order to continue to fund our research and development, including our long-term
plans for clinical trials and new product development, as well as to fund
operations generally. We may seek to raise additional funds through
various potential sources, such as equity and debt financings, or though
corporate collaboration and license agreements. We can give no
assurances that we will be able to secure such additional sources of funds to
support or operations, or, if it such funds are available to us, that such
additional financing will be sufficient to meet our needs.
On July
7, 2009 we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain investors
pursuant to which we agreed to sell to such investors in a private placement
2,691,394 units of its securities. Each unit included one share of common stock
and one five-year warrant to purchase a share of common stock. The private
placement was completed on July 15, 2009 and resulted in gross proceeds of
$3,368,748 before deducting expenses. Total costs associated with
this financing were approximately $282,700, of which $201,200 was a non-cash
cost related to warrants paid to the placement agent, resulting in net cash
received of approximately $3,316,000.
Based on
our resources at September 30, 2009, proceeds realized from our July 2009
private placement of securities, and the current plan of expenditure on
continuing development of current products, we believe we have sufficient
capital to fund our operations through 2010. However, pending results of our
ongoing Phase II clinical trial of CD-NP, we would need substantial additional
capital in order to initiate and fund the next clinical study of CD-NP, which is
expected to be a Phase IIb clinical trial. Cost savings implemented in the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 included a significant staff reduction and the
increased use of part-time consultants. Our actual cash requirements may vary
materially from those now planned, however, because of a number of factors,
including the changes in the focus and direction of our research and development
programs, including the acquisition and pursuit of development of new product
candidates; competitive and technical advances; costs of commercializing any of
the product candidates; and costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and
enforcing any patent claims and any other intellectual property
rights. If we are unable to raise additional funds when needed, we
may not be able to market our products as planned or continue development and
regulatory approval of our products, we could be required to delay, scale back
or eliminate some or all our research and development programs and we may need
to wind down our operations altogether. Each of these alternatives
would likely have a material adverse effect on our business.
To the
extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity or convertible or
non-convertible debt securities, our stockholders may experience additional
significant dilution and such financing may involve restrictive covenants. To
the extent that we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing
arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies
or our product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable
to us. These things may have a material adverse effect on our
business.
The
continuation of our business beyond 2010 is dependent upon obtaining further
long-term financing, the successful development of our drug product candidates
and related technologies, the successful and sufficient market acceptance of any
product offerings that we may introduce, and, finally, the achievement of a
profitable level of operations. The issuance of additional equity securities by
us may result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of current
stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be
available, including on acceptable terms, will increase our liabilities and
future cash commitments.
Off
-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There
were no off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30,
2009.
Contractual
Obligations
Pursuant
to our license agreement with Mayo for CD-NP, in July 2008 we made a milestone
payment of $400,000 to Mayo upon the dosing of the first patient in a Phase II
trial. Subsequent milestones achieved will require us to make additional
milestone payments to Mayo. We agreed to make contingent cash payments up
to an aggregate of $31.9 million upon successful completion of specified
clinical and regulatory milestones relating to CD-NP. This aggregate amount is
subject to increase upon the receipt of regulatory approval for each additional
indication of CD-NP as well as for additional compounds or analogues contained
in the intellectual property.
The CD-NP
License Agreement, unless earlier terminated, will continue in full force and
effect until January 20, 2026. However, to the extent any patent
covered by the license is issued with an expiration date beyond January 20,
2026, the term of the agreement will continue until such expiration
date. Mayo may terminate the agreement earlier (i) for our material
breach of the agreement that remains uncured after 90 days’ written notice to
us, (ii) our insolvency or bankruptcy, or (iii) if we challenge the validity or
enforceability of any of the patents in any manner. We may terminate
the agreement without cause upon 90 days’ written notice.
On June
13, 2008, we entered into the CU-NP License Agreement with Mayo. Under the terms
of the agreement, Mayo granted to us a worldwide, exclusive license for the
rights to commercially develop CU-NP for all therapeutic indications. We also
have the rights to improvements to CU-NP and know-how that arise out of the
laboratory of Dr. John Burnett and Dr. Candace Lee, the inventors of CU-NP,
until June 12, 2011.
Under the
terms of the CU-NP License Agreement, we made an up-front cash payment to Mayo
and agreed to make future contingent cash payments up to an aggregate
of $24.3 million upon achievement of specific clinical and regulatory milestones
relating to CU-NP, including a milestone payment due in connection with the
initiation of the first Phase II clinical trial of the licensed product. This
aggregate amount of $24.25 million is subject to increase upon the receipt of
regulatory approval for each additional indication of CU-NP, as well as for
additional compounds or analogues contained in the intellectual property.
Pursuant to the agreement, we must also pay Mayo an annual maintenance fee and a
percentage of net sales of licensed products.
In
addition to these cash payments payable with respect to the CU-NP License
Agreement, we also agreed to issue shares of our common stock and warrants to
Mayo. In June 2008, we issued 49,689 shares of common stock to Mayo having a
fair market value as of June 13, 2008 equal to $250,000. This amount has been
recorded in research and development expenses in the accompanying Condensed
Statements of Operations. Additionally, Dr. Burnett has applied for funding
through Mayo’s Discovery-Translation Program. In the event Dr. Burnett is
awarded funding through this program, and the funding is used for the
development of the licensed product based on the patent applications, we agreed
to grant to Mayo an equivalent dollar value in warrants to purchase shares of
our common stock. The number of shares purchasable under these warrants will be
calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the warrants will
include a cashless exercise provision with language to be negotiated in good
faith between the parties.
The CU-NP
License Agreement, unless earlier terminated, will continue in full force and
effect until June 13, 2028. However, to the extent any patent covered
by the license is issued with an expiration date beyond June 13, 2028, the term
of the agreement will continue until such expiration date. Mayo may terminate
the agreement earlier (i) for our material breach of the agreement that remains
uncured after 90 days’ written notice to us, (ii) our insolvency or bankruptcy,
(iii) if we challenge the validity or enforceability of any of the patents in
any manner, or (iv) or upon receipt of notice from the Company that we have
terminated all development efforts under the agreement. We may terminate the
agreement without cause upon 90 days’ written notice.
In March
2008, we entered into a non-cancelable office lease agreement for office space
in San Francisco, California. The lease expires in March 2011. Future minimum
lease payments under the lease were approximately $29,000 for the remainder of
2009, $116,000 in 2010, and $29,000 in 2011, not including annual operating cost
escalations. Subsequent to September 30, 2009, we entered into a lease
termination agreement for the office space in San Francisco and paid $130,000 to
satisfy the remaining lease liability. The standby letter of credit
that served as a security deposit was cancelled and the corresponding restricted
cash, approximately $55,000, held by the Company will no longer be subject to
restriction.
Related Party
Transactions
As
consideration for the performance of consulting and due diligence efforts
related to the licensing of 2NTX-99, in 2007 we granted fully vested warrants to
purchase 206,912 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.71. Of
the total amount of the warrants granted, 137,567 were granted to employees of
Two River, a related party, and its affiliates. The remaining warrants were
granted to outside consultants.
On June
24, 2009, we entered into a services agreement with Two River Consulting, LLC,
or TRC, to provide us with various clinical development, operational and
administrative services for a period of one year. As compensation for
such services, we will pay to TRC a monthly cash fee of $65,000 and we issued
stock option to purchase up to an aggregate of 750,000 shares of our common
stock at a price per share equal to $0.89, the closing sale price of our common
stock on June 24, 2009. Shares relating to 25% of this option vested immediately
and the remaining shares will vest pursuant to the achievement of certain
milestones relating to the development of CD-NP.
Joshua A.
Kazam, our President and Chief Executive Officer and director and Arie S.
Belldegrun, who was appointed to serve as a member of our Board of Directors on
September 24, 2009, are each partners of TRC. David M. Tanen, who
served as our Secretary and director until his resignation from both positions
on September 24, 2009, is also a partner of TRC. The terms of the services
agreement with TRC were reviewed and approved by a special committee of our
Board of Directors consisting of Pedro Granadillo, Paul Mieyal and Greg
Schafer. None of the members of the special committee has any
interest in TRC or the agreement.
In
connection with our July 2009 private placement, we engaged Riverbank Capital
Securities, Inc. (“Riverbank”), a FINRA member broker dealer, to serve as
placement agent. Riverbank was not paid a cash commission for its services in
connection with the financing. However, we issued to designees of
Riverbank warrants to purchase 218,300 shares of our common stock. The warrants
issued to Riverbank have an exercise price of $1.375, which is equal to 110% of
the closing price of the units sold to investors, and have a cashless (net)
exercise provision. We also paid Riverbank an expense allowance of
$50,000 to cover expenses incurred during the financing.
Peter M.
Kash, the Chairman our Board of Directors, Joshua A. Kazam, our President and
Chief Executive Officer and director, and David M. Tanen, our former Secretary
and director, are each officers of and collectively control Riverbank. In light
of the relationship between Messrs. Kash, Kazam and Tanen and Riverbank, the
selection and terms of the engagement were reviewed and approved by a special
committee of our Board consisting of Pedro Granadillo, Paul Mieyal and Gregory
Schaefer, none of whom has any interest or other relationship in Riverbank or
its affiliates.
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has
had a material impact on our business and operating results during the periods
presented.
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
|
Our exposure to market risk for changes
in interest rates relates primarily to our cash and cash equivalents. The goal
of our investment policy is to place our investments with highly rated credit
issuers and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. We seek to
improve the safety and likelihood of preservation of our invested funds by
limiting default risk and market risk. Our policy is to mitigate default risk by
investing in high credit quality securities and currently do not hedge interest
rate exposure. Due to our policy to only make investments with short-term
maturities, we do not believe that an increase in market rates would have any
material negative impact on the value of our investment portfolio.
As of
September 30, 2009, our portfolio consisted primarily of bank savings accounts
and a certificate of deposit associated with our lease obligation, and we did
not have any investments with significant exposure to the subprime mortgage
market issues. Based on our investment portfolio and interest rates at September
30, 2009, we believe that a decrease in interest rates would not have a
significant impact on the fair value of our cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $1.8 million.
Item 4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow
for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating
the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls
and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management
is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures.
As
required by Commission Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September
30, 2009. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
There has
been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
We are a
“smaller reporting company” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Hence,
under current law, the internal controls certification and attestation
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will not apply to us
until the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. Notwithstanding the fact
that these internal control requirements do not apply to us at this time,
management has begun reviewing our internal control procedures to facilitate
compliance with those requirements when they become applicable.
PART
II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
The
Company is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings.
Investment
in our common stock involves significant risk. You should carefully consider the
information described in the following risk factors, together with the other
information appearing elsewhere in this report, before making an investment
decision regarding our common stock. You should also consider the risk factors
set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
(“2008 Annual Report”) under the caption “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” If
any of the risks described below or our 2008 Annual Report actually occur, our
business, financial conditions, results of operation and future growth prospects
would likely be materially and adversely affected. In these circumstances, the
market price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or a part
of your investment in our common stock. Moreover, the risks described below and
in our 2008 Annual Report are not the only ones that we face. Additional risks
not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect
our business, operating results, prospects or financial
condition.
Our
business is substantially dependent on the results of our ongoing Phase II
study of CD-NP and our ability to fund, either alone or with a strategic
partner, its further development.
|
A
substantial portion of our current human and financial resources is focused on
the development of CD-NP, our lead product candidate and our only product
candidate in clinical development. In July 2009, we dosed the first
patient in a 30-40 patient single-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II study
designed to provide additional information on the safety and tolerability of
CD-NP when infused for up to 72 hours in patients with acute heart failure and
renal function insufficiency. Additionally, the study contains
several exploratory efficacy endpoints to provide insight into the potential for
CD-NP to enhance renal function in acute heart failure patients. We expect
results from this Phase II study to be available in the first half of
2010. Subject to the results of the Phase II study, we plan to either
collaborate with a strategic partner to continue further development of CD-NP or
undertake such further development on our own. If we undertake the
further development of CD-NP on our own, we will require substantial additional
capital to fund such activities. If we are unable to identify and
secure a partner to continue the further development of CD-NP or obtain the
additional funds required to fund such development on our own, our business
would be substantially and adversely affected and we would be forced to
significantly curtail or even cease our operations. Further, our
business and future prospects will also be substantially and adversely affected
if the data from the ongoing Phase II study of CD-NP are insufficient to support
any further development of that drug compound, in which case, we may be forced
to cease our operations.
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Securities and Use of
Proceeds.
|
During
the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 5,000 shares of
its common stock pursuant to the exercise of an outstanding warrant originally
issued in connection with the Company’s July 2009 private
placement. The exercise price paid by the warrant holder was $1.25
per share, resulting in total gross proceeds of $6,250.
The sale
of the shares of common stock identified above was made pursuant to a private
transaction that did not involve a public offering of securities and,
accordingly, we believe (i) that these transactions were exempt from
registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2)
thereof and rules promulgated thereunder, (ii) the purchaser acquired the shares
for investment and not distribution, (iii) the purchaser could bear the risks of
the investment, and (iv) the purchaser could hold the securities for an
indefinite period of time. The purchaser received written disclosures that the
securities had not been registered under the Securities Act and any resale must
be made pursuant to an effective registration statement or an available
exemption from such registration. The shares of common stock issued upon
exercise of the warrant are deemed restricted securities for purposes of the
Securities Act.
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
|
Not
applicable.
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders.
|
Not
applicable.
Item 5.
|
Other
Information.
|
Subsequent to September 30, 2009, the
Company entered into a lease termination agreement for the office space in San
Francisco. The Company paid $130,000 to satisfy the remaining lease
liability. The standby letter of credit that served as a security
deposit was cancelled and the corresponding restricted cash, approximately
$55,000, held by the Company will no longer be subject to
restriction.
Exhibit No.
|
|
Exhibit
Description
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form
of Warrant issued to investors in July 2009 private placement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed on August 13, 2009).
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Form
of Warrant issued to placement agent in July 2009 private placement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed on August 13, 2009).
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form
of Securities Purchase Agreement entered into among Nile Therapeutics,
Inc. and various accredited investors on July 7, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on July 13, 2009).
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Summary
terms of compensation plan for directors of Nile Therapeutics, Inc., as
adopted July 21, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 24,
2009).
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
|
|
|
|
Date: November
12, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Joshua Kazam
|
|
|
Joshua
Kazam
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: November
12, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Daron Evans
|
|
|
Daron
Evans
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS FILED WITH THIS REPORT
Exhibit No.
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|