UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from          to         

Commission File Number: 1-7665

Lydall, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		06-0865505
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
One Colonial Road, Manchester, Connecticut		06042
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (860) 646-1233

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.10 par value		New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.        Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Accelerated filer x		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

On June 30, 2012, the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s voting stock held by nonaffiliates was $221,866,729 based on the New York Stock Exchange closing price on that date. For purposes of this calculation, the Registrant has assumed that its directors and executive officers are affiliates.

On February 15, 2013, there were 17,015,184 shares of Common Stock outstanding, exclusive of treasury shares.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III incorporates information by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be distributed in connection with the Registrant’s
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 26, 2013.

The exhibit index is located on pages 38 – 39.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
  
Year Ended December 31, 2012

			Page Number
Cautionary Note Concerning Factors That May Affect Future Results			ii
PART I
Item 1. Business			1
Item 1A. Risk Factors			5
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments			9
Item 2. Properties			9
Item 3. Legal Proceedings			9
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures			9
Executive Officers of the Registrant			10
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			11
Item 6. Selected Financial Data			14
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			15
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			33
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data			33
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure			33
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures			34
Item 9B. Other Information			34
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance			35
Item 11. Executive Compensation			35
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters			35
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence			36
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services			36
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules			37
Signatures			40

The information called for by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, to the extent not included in this document, is incorporated herein by reference to such information included in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and distributed in connection with Lydall, Inc.’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 26, 2013.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY NOTE CONCERNING FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS

Lydall, Inc. and its subsidiaries are hereafter collectively referred to as “Lydall,” the “Company” or the “Registrant.”

This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In general, any statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act. All such forward-looking statements are intended to provide management’s current expectations for the future operating and financial performance of the Company based on current expectations and assumptions relating to the Company’s business, the economy and other future conditions. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified through the use of the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “expects,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “predicts,” “targets,” and other similar expressions in connection with the discussion of future operating or financial performance. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Accordingly, the Company’s actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Investors, therefore, are cautioned against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes, among others, statements relating to:

All forward-looking statements are inherently subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results of the Company to differ materially from those reflected in forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in press releases and in other statements made by the Company’s authorized officers. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, worldwide economic cycles that affect the markets which the Company’s businesses serve could affect demand for the Company’s products and impact the Company’s profitability, disruptions in the global credit and financial markets, including diminished liquidity and credit availability,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

swings in consumer confidence and spending, unstable economic growth, fluctuations in unemployment rates, and increases in fuel prices, as well as other risks and uncertainties identified in Part I, Item 1A — Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the initial filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Lydall does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement made in this report or that may from time to time be made by or on behalf of the Company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

Lydall, Inc. has been incorporated in Delaware since 1987 after originally being incorporated in Connecticut in 1969. The principal executive offices are located in Manchester, Connecticut. The Company’s subsidiaries design and manufacture specialty engineered filtration media, industrial thermal insulating solutions, automotive thermal and acoustical barriers, medical filtration media and devices and biopharmaceutical processing components for thermal/acoustical, filtration/separation and bio/medical applications.

Lydall serves a number of markets. The Company’s products are primarily sold directly to customers through an internal sales force and external sales representatives and distributed via common carrier. The majority of products are sold to original equipment manufacturers and tier-one suppliers. The Company competes through high-quality, specialty engineered innovative products and exceptional customer service. Lydall has a number of domestic and foreign competitors for its products, most of whom are either privately owned or divisions of larger companies, making it difficult to determine the Company’s share of the markets served.

Foreign and export sales were 46.7% of net sales in 2012, 49.9% in 2011, and 50.7% in 2010. Foreign sales were $127.2 million, $144.5 million, and $119.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Export sales primarily to Europe, Asia, Mexico and Canada were $49.7 million, $47.0 million, and $40.7 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The decrease in foreign sales during 2012, compared to 2011, was primarily due to the decrease in sales at the Company’s automotive facility in Germany, which is included in the Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment. The decrease in sales at the automotive facility in Germany was primarily a result of unfavorable foreign currency translation, and to a lesser extent, lower demand due to economic conditions in Europe and Asia. The increase in export sales during 2012, compared to 2011, was primarily related to higher export sales to Canada and Mexico in the Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segments, due to strong overall demand in North America, partially offset by a decrease in export sales to Asia in the Performance Materials segment as a result of the macro-economic slowdown in that region.

Foreign operations generated operating income of $6.4 million, $11.9 million, and $9.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Total foreign assets were $95.1 million, $88.9 million and $94.1 million at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For further detail regarding revenue and financial information about the Company’s geographic areas, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and Proxy Statements are made available free of charge through the Investor Relations section of the Company’s Internet website at www.lydall.com after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) and are also available on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. Information found on these websites is not part of this Form 10-K. Additionally, the public may read and copy any materials the Company files with the Commission at the Commission’s Public Reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330.

SEGMENTS

The Company’s reportable segments are Performance Materials, Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers. The Performance Materials segment reports the results of the Industrial Filtration, Industrial Thermal Insulation and Life Sciences Filtration businesses. The Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment reports the results of Lydall’s automotive business, which includes metal parts and related tooling. The Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment reports the results of Lydall’s automotive business, which includes fiber parts and related tooling. Other Products and Services (“OPS”) include Life Sciences Vital Fluids. For additional information regarding the Company’s reportable segments, please refer to Note 10 in the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report.

During 2012, the Thermal/Acoustical business reorganized its management reporting structure. Prior to this reorganization, the Thermal/Acoustical business was comprised of one operating segment for financial reporting purposes. The Company now manages and

TABLE OF CONTENTS

measures its Thermal/Acoustical business performance in two distinct operating segments: Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers. The new segments reflect the way the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker reviews operating results for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance.

Performance Materials Segment

The Performance Materials segment includes filtration media solutions for air, fluid power, and industrial applications (“Industrial Filtration”), air and liquid life science applications (“Life Sciences Filtration”), and industrial thermal insulation solutions for building products, appliances, and energy and industrial markets (“Industrial Thermal Insulation”).

Industrial Filtration products include LydAir® MG (Micro-Glass) Air Filtration Media, LydAir® MB (Melt Blown) Air Filtration Media, LydAir® SC (Synthetic Composite) Air Filtration Media, and Arioso^TM Membrane Composite Media. These products constitute the critical media component of clean-air systems for applications in clean-space, commercial, industrial and residential HVAC, power generation, and industrial processes. Lydall has leveraged its extensive technical expertise and applications knowledge into a suite of media products covering the vast liquid filtration landscape across the engine and industrial fields. The LyPore® Liquid Filtration Media and activated carbon containing ActiPure® Filtration Media series address a variety of application needs in fluid power including hydraulic filters, air-water and air-oil coalescing, industrial fluid processes, diesel filtration and fuel filtration.

Life Sciences Filtration products include the LyPore® and ActiPure® Filtration Media developed to meet the requirements of life science applications including biopharmaceutical pre-filtration and clarification, diagnostic and analytical testing, respiratory protection, life protection, medical air filtration, drinking water filtration and high purity process filtration such as that found in food and beverage and medical applications. Lydall also offers Solupor® Membrane specialty microporous membranes that are utilized in various markets and applications including air and liquid filtration and transdermal drug delivery. Solupor® membranes are made from ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and incorporate a unique combination of mechanical strength, chemical inertness, and high porosity in a unique open structure.

Industrial Thermal Insulation products are high performance nonwoven veils, papers, mats and specialty composites for the building products, appliance, and energy and industrial markets. The Manniglas® Thermal Insulation brand is diverse in its product application ranging from high temperature seals and gaskets in ovens and ranges to specialty veils for HVAC and cavity wall insulation. appLY® Mat Needled Glass Mats have been developed to expand Lydall’s high temperature technology portfolio for broad application into the appliance market and supplements the Lytherm® Insulation Media product brand, traditionally utilized in the industrial market for kilns and furnaces used in metal processing. Lydall’s Cryotherm® Super-Insulating Media, CRS-Wrap® Super-Insulating Media and Cryo-Lite^TM Cryogenic Insulation products are industry standards for state-of-the-art cryogenic insulation designs used by manufacturers of cryogenic equipment for liquid gas storage, piping, and transportation.

Net sales from the Performance Materials segment represented 31.2% of Lydall’s net sales in 2012 compared with 34.9% in 2011 and 39.0% in 2010. Net sales generated by the international operations of the Performance Materials segment accounted for 30.6% of segment net sales in 2012 and 29.8% of segment net sales in 2011 and 2010.

Thermal/Acoustical Metals Segment

The Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment offers a full range of innovative engineered products to assist in noise and heat abatement within the transportation sector. Lydall products are found in underbody (tunnel, fuel tank, exhaust, rear muffler and spare tire) and under hood (engine compartment, turbo charger, and manifolds) of cars, trucks, SUVs, heavy duty trucks and recreational vehicles.

Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment products are stamped metal combinations which provide thermal and acoustical shielding solutions for the global automotive and truck markets. Thermal/Acoustical Metals products include AMS®, which is an all metal shield designed to be used in various vehicle applications, and Direct Exhaust Mount Heat shields, which are mounted to high temperature surfaces like exhaust down-pipes or engine manifolds using aluminized and stainless steel with high performance heat absorbing materials. A recently developed and patented CLD (constraint layer damped) material is a lightweight material with characteristics to reduce vibration and parasitic noise on powertrain mounted heat shields.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment net sales represented 40.6% of the Company’s net sales in 2012, 40.7% in 2011 and 40.6% in 2010. Net sales generated by international operations of the Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment accounted for 59.2%, 44.2% and 64.5% of segment net sales in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Thermal/Acoustical Fibers Segment

The Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment offers a full line of innovative engineered products to assist in noise and heat abatement within the transportation sector. Lydall products are found in the interior (dash insulators), underbody (wheel well, fuel tank, exhaust) and under hood (engine compartment) of cars, trucks, SUVs, heavy duty trucks and recreational vehicles.

Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment products offer thermal and acoustical insulating solutions comprised of organic and inorganic fiber composites for the automotive and truck markets primarily in North America. Lydall’s dBCore® is a lightweight acoustical composite that emphasizes absorption principles over heavy-mass type systems. Lydall’s dBLyte® is a high-performance acoustical barrier with sound absorption and blocking properties and can be used throughout a vehicle’s interior to minimize intrusive noise from an engine compartment and road. Lydall’s ZeroClearance® is an innovative thermal solution that utilizes an adhesive backing for attachment and is ideal for protecting floor sheet metal from excessive exhaust heat. Lydall’s specially engineered wheel wells provide a solution with weight reduction and superior noise suppression capabilities over conventional designs.

Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment net sales represented 24.9% of the Company’s net sales in 2012, 21.3% in 2011 and 16.4% in 2010. There are no net sales generated by international operations, as the Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment only produces domestically.

The Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment operating results include allocations of certain costs shared between the segments.

Other Products and Services

The Life Sciences Vital Fluids business offers specialty products for blood filtration devices, blood transfusion single-use containers and bioprocessing single-use containers and products for containment of media, buffers and bulk intermediates used in biotech, pharmaceutical and diagnostic reagent manufacturing processes.

OPS net sales were 4.4% of the Company’s net sales in 2012 compared with 3.8% in 2011 and 4.9% in 2010.

For further detail regarding financial information about the Company’s reporting segments, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

GENERAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

Lydall holds a number of patents, trademarks and licenses. While no single patent, trademark or license is critical to the success of Lydall, together these intangible assets are of considerable value to the Company.

The Company’s business is generally not seasonal; however, results of operations are impacted by shutdowns at its domestic operations and European operations as a result of customer shutdowns in North America and Europe that typically occur in the third and fourth quarters of each year. Lydall maintains levels of inventory and grants credit terms that are normal within the industries it serves. The Company uses a wide range of raw materials in the manufacturing of its products, including aluminum and other metals to manufacture most of its automotive heat shields and various fibers in its Performance Materials and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segments. The majority of raw materials used are generally available from a variety of suppliers.

Sales to Ford Motor Company accounted for 18.8%, 16.2% and 11.1% of Lydall’s net sales in the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Sales to Chrysler Group LLC accounted for 10.0% of Lydall’s net sales in the year ended December 31, 2012. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of Lydall’s net sales in such years.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Company invested $7.7 million in 2012, $8.1 million in 2011 and $8.5 million in 2010, or approximately 2% in 2012 and 2011 and 3% in 2010, of net sales, in research and development to develop new products and to improve existing products. All amounts were expensed as incurred. Most of the investment in research and development is application specific. There were no significant customer-sponsored research and development activities during the past three years.

Backlog at January 31, 2013 was $54.1 million. Lydall’s backlog was $48.8 million at December 31, 2012, $48.3 million at December 31, 2011 and $47.4 million at December 31, 2010. Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers backlog, which comprises the majority of total backlog, may be impacted by various assumptions, including future automotive production volume estimates, changes in program launch timing and changes in customer development plans. The Company believes that global automotive orders for a two month period represent a reasonable timeframe to be deemed as firm orders and included as Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment backlog. There are minimal seasonal aspects to Lydall’s backlog.

No material portion of Lydall’s business is subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of contracts or subcontracts at the election of any governmental body.

Lydall believes that its plants and equipment are in substantial compliance with applicable federal, state and local provisions that have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment.

As of December 31, 2012, Lydall employed approximately 1,600 people. Three unions with contracts expiring on September 30, 2016 represent approximately 60 employees in the United States. All employees at the facilities in France and the Netherlands are covered under a National Collective Bargaining Agreement. Certain salaried and all hourly employees in Germany are also covered under a National Collective Bargaining Agreement. Lydall considers its employee relationships to be satisfactory and did not have any actual or threatened work stoppages due to union-related activities in 2012.

There are no significant anticipated operating risks related to foreign investment law, expropriation, or availability of material, labor or energy. The foreign and domestic operations limit foreign currency exchange transaction risk by completing transactions in functional currencies whenever practical or through the use of foreign currency forward exchange contracts when deemed appropriate.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The reader should carefully review and consider the risk factors discussed below. Any and all of these risk factors could materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition, future results of operations or cash flows and possibly lead to a decline in Lydall’s stock price. The risks, uncertainties and other factors described below constitute all material risk factors known to management as of the date of this report.

Uncertainty in the global economy may continue to negatively impact Lydall’s business — Uncertainty in the global economy has affected, and could continue to adversely affect demand for the Company’s products and impact profitability. Among other factors, disruptions in the global credit and financial markets, including diminished liquidity and credit availability, swings in consumer confidence and spending, unstable economic growth and fluctuations in unemployment rates has caused economic instability that had, and could continue to have, a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity and make it difficult to accurately forecast and plan future business activities.

The Company’s foreign and export sales were 46.7% of net sales in 2012, 49.9% in 2011, and 50.7% in 2010. If the global economy were to take a significant downturn, depending on the length, duration and severity of such downturn, the Company’s business and financial statements could be adversely affected.

The Company’s Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segments are tied to general economic and automotive industry conditions — The Company’s Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segments, suppliers in the automotive market, accounted for 65.5%, 62.0% and 57.0% of consolidated net sales in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The segments net sales from products manufactured in North America were 63.1%, 55.7% and 53.5% in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, with the remainder manufactured in Europe. These segments are tied to general economic and automotive industry conditions as demand for vehicles depends largely on the strength of the economy, employment levels, consumer confidence levels, the availability and cost of credit and the cost of fuel. These factors have had, and could continue to have, a substantial impact on these segments. Adverse developments could reduce demand for new vehicles, causing Lydall’s customers to reduce their vehicle production in North America and Europe and, as a result, demand for Company products would be adversely affected.

The Company’s quarterly operating results may fluctuate. As a result, the Company may fail to meet or exceed the expectations of research analysts or investors, which could cause the stock price to decline — The Company’s quarterly results are subject to significant fluctuations. Operating results have fluctuated as a result of many factors, including size and timing of orders and shipments, loss of significant customers, product mix, technological change, operational efficiencies and inefficiencies, competition, changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances, strategic initiatives, severance and recruiting charges, and general economic conditions. In addition, lower revenues may cause asset utilization to decrease, resulting in the under absorption of the Company’s fixed costs, which could negatively impact gross margins. Additionally, the Company’s gross margins vary among its product groups and have fluctuated from quarter to quarter as a result of shifts in product mix. Any and all of these factors could affect the Company’s business, financial condition, future results of operations or cash flows and possibly lead to a decline in Lydall’s stock price.

Implementation of strategic initiatives may not be successful — As part of Lydall’s business strategy, the Company continues to review various strategic and business opportunities to grow the business and to assess the profitability and growth potential for each of its existing businesses. The Company may incur significant professional services expenses associated with the review and potential implementation of strategic business opportunities. The Company cannot predict with certainty whether any recent or future strategic transactions will be beneficial to the Company. Future performance could be impacted by the Company’s ability to:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Future performance may also be impacted by the Company’s ability to improve operating margins under its Lean Six Sigma initiatives. The Lean Six Sigma program is intended to improve processes and work flow, improve customer service, reduce costs and leverage synergies across the Company to improve operating margins.

In order to meet its strategic objectives, the Company may also divest assets and/or businesses. Successfully executing such a strategy depends on various factors, including effectively transferring assets, liabilities, contracts, facilities and employees to any purchaser, identifying and separating the intellectual property to be divested from the intellectual property that the Company wishes to retain, reducing or eliminating fixed costs previously associated with the divested assets or business, and collecting the proceeds from any divestitures.

Raw material pricing and supply issues could affect all of the Company’s businesses — The Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment uses aluminum and other metals to manufacture most of its automotive heat shields. The Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment and Performance Materials segment use various fibers in manufacturing products. If the prices of these raw materials, or any other raw materials used in the Company’s businesses increase, the Company may not have the ability to pass incremental cost increases on to its customers. In addition, an interruption in the ability of the Company to source such materials could negatively impact operations and sales.

If the Company’s goodwill or other long-lived assets become impaired, it may be required to record a significant charge to earnings — The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is also tested by the Company for impairment during the fourth quarter of each year. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of goodwill or other long-lived assets may not be recoverable, include, but are not limited to, a decline in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization, reduced future cash flow estimates, and slower growth rates. In 2012, the Company determined that its Solutech long-lived asset group, with a carrying amount of $4.7 million had excess fair value over its carrying value. The determination of fair value was based on the assumption that Solutech’s customers would succeed in commercializing their products that contain Solutech technology. Small changes in future operating results could result in a future non-cash impairment charge to income from operations.

Volatility in the securities markets, interest rates, and other factors could substantially increase the Company’s costs and funding for its domestic defined benefit pension plan — The Company’s domestic defined benefit pension plan is funded with trust assets invested in a diversified portfolio of securities. Changes in interest rates, mortality rates, investment returns, and the market value of plan assets may affect the funded status and cause volatility in the net periodic benefit cost and future funding requirements of such plan. A significant increase in benefit plan liabilities or future funding requirements could have a negative impact on the Company’s financial statements.

The Company is involved with certain legal proceedings and may become involved in future legal proceedings all of which could give rise to liability — The Company is involved in legal proceedings that, from time to time, may be material. These proceedings may include, without limitation, commercial or contractual disputes, intellectual property matters, personal injury claims, shareholder claims, and employment matters. No assurances can be given that such proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Changes in tax rates and exposure to additional income tax liabilities — The Company is subject to risks with respect to changes in tax law and rates, changes in rules related to accounting for income taxes, or adverse outcomes from tax audits that are in process in various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. In addition, certain jurisdictions have statutory rates greater than or less than the United States statutory rate. Changes in the mix and source of earnings between jurisdictions could have a significant impact on the Company’s overall effective tax rate.

Realization of deferred tax assets is not assured — The Company maintains valuation allowances against certain deferred tax assets where realization is not reasonably assured. The Company evaluates the likelihood of the realization of all deferred tax assets and reduces the carrying amount to the extent it believes a portion will not be realized. Changes in these assessments can result in an increase or reduction to valuation allowances on deferred tax assets and could have a significant impact on the Company’s overall effective tax rate.

The Company’s future success depends upon its ability to continue to innovate, improve its products, develop and market new products, and identify and enter new markets — Improved performance and growth are partially dependent on new product introductions planned for the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

future. Delays in developing products and long customer qualification cycles may impact the success of new product programs. The degree of success of new product programs could impact the Company’s future results.

The Company’s international operations expose it to business, economic, political, legal and other risks — The Company believes that in order to be competitive and grow its businesses, it needs to maintain significant international operations. Foreign sales were $127.2 million, $144.5 million, and $119.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. International operations are subject to inherent risks including political and economic conditions in various countries, unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, longer accounts receivable collection cycles and potentially adverse tax consequences.

Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations may affect the Company’s results of operations — The Company’s primary currency exposure is to the Euro. The Company’s foreign and domestic operations seek to limit foreign currency exchange transaction risk by completing transactions in functional currencies whenever practical or through the use of foreign currency forward exchange contracts when deemed appropriate. If the Company does not successfully hedge its currency exposure, changes in the rate of exchange between these currencies and the U.S. dollar may negatively impact the Company. Additionally, translation of the results of operations and financial condition of its foreign operations into U.S. dollars may be affected by exchange rate fluctuations. The Company receives a material portion of its revenue from foreign operations.

The Company’s manufacturing processes are subject to inherent risk — The Company operates a number of manufacturing facilities and relies upon an effective workforce and properly performing machinery and equipment. The workforce may experience a relatively high turnover rate, causing inefficiencies associated with retraining and rehiring. The equipment and systems necessary for such operations may break down, perform poorly or fail, and possibly cause higher manufacturing costs. Manufacturing processes affect the Company’s ability to deliver quality products on a timely basis, and delays in delivering products to customers could result in the Company incurring penalties from customers.

Increases in energy pricing can affect all of the Company’s businesses — Higher energy costs at the Company’s manufacturing plants or higher energy costs passed on from the Company’s vendors could impact the Company’s profitability.

The Company’s resources are limited and may impair its ability to capitalize on changes in technology, competition and pricing — The industries in which the Company sells its products are highly competitive and many of the competitors are affiliated with entities that are substantially larger and that have greater financial, technical and marketing resources. The Company’s more limited resources and relatively diverse product mix may limit or impair its ability to capitalize on changes in technology, competition and pricing.

The Company’s products may fail to perform as expected, subjecting it to warranty or other claims from its customers — If such failure results in, or is alleged to result in, bodily injury and/or property damage or other losses, the Company may be subject to product liability lawsuits, U.S. Food and Drug Administration product recalls and other claims, any of which could have a material adverse impact on results of operations and cash flows.

If the Company does not retain its key employees, the Company’s ability to execute its business strategy could be adversely affected —  The Company’s success, in part, depends on key managerial, engineering, sales and marketing and technical personnel and its ability to continue to attract and retain additional personnel. The loss of certain key personnel could have a material, adverse effect upon the Company's business and results of operations. There is no assurance that the Company can retain its key employees or that it can attract competent and effective new or replacement personnel in the future.

The Company’s current reserve levels may not be adequate to cover potential exposures — Estimates and assumptions may affect the reserves that the Company has established to cover uncollectible accounts receivable, excess or obsolete inventory, income tax valuation and fair market value write downs of certain assets and various liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations, that could increase its expense and affect operating results — The Company is subject to federal, state, local, and foreign environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that affect operations. New and changing environmental laws and regulations may impact the products manufactured and sold to customers. In order to maintain

TABLE OF CONTENTS

compliance with such laws and regulations, the Company must devote significant resources and maintain and administer adequate policies, procedures and oversight. Should the Company fail to do these things, it could be negatively impacted by lower net sales, fines, legal costs, and clean-up requirements.

The Company may be unable to adequately protect its intellectual property, which may limit its ability to compete effectively — The Company owns intellectual property, including patents and trademarks, which play an important role in helping the Company to maintain its competitive position in a number of markets. The Company is subject to risks with respect to (i) changes in the intellectual property landscape of markets in which it competes; (ii) the potential assertion of intellectual property-related claims against the Company; (iii) the failure to maximize or successfully assert its intellectual property rights; and (iv) significant technological developments by others.

Disruptions may occur to the Company’s operations relating to information technology — The capacity, reliability and security of the Company’s information technology (“IT”) hardware and software infrastructure and the ability to expand and update this infrastructure in response to the Company’s changing needs are important to the operation of the businesses. In response to a review of its IT infrastructure, the Company has undertaken a project to upgrade its enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system. The deployment, implementation and integration to a new version of its ERP system may not be managed in an efficient, timely and cost effective manner resulting in greater than anticipated costs and other operating difficulties. Also, any inadequacy, interruption, loss of data, integration failure or security failure of the Company’s IT technology could harm its ability to effectively operate its business, which could adversely impact the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.

The Company could be subject to work stoppages or other business interruptions as a result of its unionized work force — A portion of the Company’s hourly employees are represented by various union locals and covered by collective bargaining agreements. These agreements contain various expiration dates and must be renegotiated upon expiration. Specifically, three union contracts expiring on September 30, 2016 represent approximately 60 employees in the United States. If the Company is unable to negotiate any of its collective bargaining agreements on satisfactory terms prior to expiration, the Company could experience disruptions in its operations which could have a material adverse effect on operations.

The Company may not have adequate cash to fund its operating requirements — The principal source of the Company’s liquidity is operating cash flows. In addition to operating cash flows, other significant factors that affect the overall management of liquidity include capital expenditures, investments in businesses, acquisitions, income tax payments, pension funding, outcomes of contingencies and availability of lines of credit and long-term financing. The Company’s liquidity can be impacted by the Company’s ability to:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The principal properties of the Company as of December 31, 2012 are situated at the following locations and have the following characteristics:

Location		Primary Business Segment/General Description		Type of Interest
Hamptonville, North Carolina		Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Fibers – Product Manufacturing		Owned
Yadkinville, North Carolina		Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Fibers – Product Manufacturing		Leased
Meinerzhagen, Germany		Thermal/Acoustical Metals – Product Manufacturing		Owned
Saint-Nazaire, France		Thermal/Acoustical Metals – Product Manufacturing		Leased
Green Island, New York		Performance Materials – Specialty Media Manufacturing		Owned
Rochester, New Hampshire		Performance Materials – Specialty Media Manufacturing		Owned
Saint-Rivalain, France		Performance Materials – Specialty Media Manufacturing		Owned
Geleen, the Netherlands		Performance Materials – Specialty Media Manufacturing		Leased
Heerlen, the Netherlands		Performance Materials – Specialty Media Manufacturing		Leased
Winston-Salem, North Carolina		Other Products and Services – Biomedical Products Manufacturing		Leased
Manchester, Connecticut		Corporate Office		Owned

For additional information regarding lease obligations, see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company considers its properties to be in good operating condition and suitable and adequate for its present needs. In addition to the properties listed above, the Company has several leases for sales offices and warehouses in the United States, Europe and Asia. In February 2013, the Company renewed the lease for its manufacturing facility in Yadkinville, North Carolina through 2018.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is, from time to time, subject to governmental audits, proceedings and various litigation relating to matters incidental to its business, including product liability, employment matters and environmental claims. While it is not possible to determine the ultimate disposition of each of these proceedings and whether they will be resolved favorably for the Company, the Company expects that the outcome of such proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The executive officers of Lydall, Inc. or its subsidiaries, together with the offices presently held by them, their business experience since January 1, 2008, and their age as of March 1, 2013, the record date of the Company’s 2013 Annual Meeting, are as follows:

Name		Age		Position and Date of Appointment		Other Business Experience Since 2008
Dale G. Barnhart		60		President, Chief Executive Officer (August 27, 2007)		Not applicable
Robert K. Julian		50		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (October 29, 2012)		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Legrand North America (October 2004 – October 2012), a provider of products and systems for electrical installation and information networks for commercial, residential and industrial buildings.
Mona G. Estey		58		Vice President, Human Resources (July 1, 2000); formerly Director, Human Resources (September 1, 1986)		Not applicable
James V. Laughlan		40		Chief Accounting Officer, Controller and Treasurer (July 27, 2012); Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (March 29, 2010); formerly Principal Accounting Officer and Controller (December 4, 2007); formerly Controller (October 17, 2005)		Not applicable

There is no family relationship among any of the Company’s directors or executive officers.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II

PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND HISTORY

The Company’s Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol LDL. The table below shows the range of reported sale prices on the NYSE Composite Tape for the Company’s Common Stock for the periods indicated. As of December 31, 2012, 4,600 stockholders of record held 16,963,844 shares of Lydall’s Common Stock, $.10 par value.

		High				Low				Close
2012
First Quarter		$	10.44			$	8.79			$	10.19
Second Quarter			13.62				9.94				13.52
Third Quarter			14.43				12.12				14.09
Fourth Quarter			14.65				11.68				14.34
2011
First Quarter		$	9.36			$	7.28			$	8.89
Second Quarter			12.04				8.55				11.96
Third Quarter			12.50				7.51				8.90
Fourth Quarter			11.70				7.75				9.49

The Company does not pay a cash dividend on its Common Stock. The Company’s domestic credit facility, entered into on June 16, 2011, has no restrictions on cash dividend payments, so long as the payments do not place the Company in default.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

In April 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a Stock Repurchase Program (“Repurchase Program”) to mitigate the potentially dilutive effects of stock options and shares of restricted and unrestricted stock granted by the Company. Under the Repurchase Program, up to 1.0 million shares of Common Stock may be purchased by the Company. There is no expiration date for the Repurchase Program.

As of December 31, 2012, there were 690,333 shares remaining available for purchase under the Repurchase Program. During 2012, the Company repurchased 309,667 shares of Common Stock at an aggregate purchase price of $3.8 million, and acquired an additional 13,235 shares through withholding, pursuant to provisions in agreements with recipients of restricted stock granted under the Company’s equity compensation plans, which allow the Company to withhold the number of shares having fair value equal to each recipient’s tax withholding due. The following table details the activity for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2012.

Period		Total Number of Shares Purchased				Average Price Paid per Share				Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs				Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Activity October 1, 2012 – October 31, 2012			—				—				—				751,067
Activity November 1, 2012 – November 30, 2012			60,734			$	12.32				60,734				690,333
Activity December 1, 2012 – December 31, 2012			—				—				—				690,333
Total			60,734			$	12.32				60,734				690,333

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following graph compares the cumulative total return on Lydall’s shares over the past five years with the cumulative total return on shares of companies comprising the Standard & Poor’s Smallcap 600 Index and the Russell 2000 Index. Cumulative total return is measured assuming an initial investment of $100 on December 31, 2007, including reinvestment of dividends. Due to the diversity of niche businesses that the Company participates in, it is difficult to identify a reasonable peer group or one industry or line-of-business index for comparison purposes. Thus, Lydall has chosen to compare its performance to the Standard & Poor’s Smallcap 600 Index and to the Russell 2000 Index, which are comprised of issuers with generally similar market capitalizations to that of the Company.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*

Among Lydall, Inc., the S&P Smallcap 600 Index,
and the Russell 2000 Index

		12/07				12/08				12/09				12/10				12/11				12/12
Lydall, Inc.		$	100.00			$	54.66			$	49.52			$	76.52			$	90.21			$	136.31
S&P Smallcap 600		$	100.00			$	68.93			$	86.55			$	109.32			$	110.43			$	128.46
Russell 2000		$	100.00			$	66.21			$	84.20			$	106.82			$	102.36			$	119.09

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY

In thousands except per share amounts and ratio data		2012				2011				2010				2009				2008
Financial results from continuing operations
Net sales		$	378,924			$	383,588			$	316,113			$	239,732			$	290,612
Income (loss) from continuing operations		$	16,806			$	9,047			$	1,899			$	(13,165	)		$	(1,581	)
Common stock per share data
Basic income (loss) from continuing operations		$	1.01			$	0.54			$	0.11			$	(0.79	)		$	(0.10	)
Basic income (loss) from discontinued operations		$	—			$	0.28			$	0.04			$	(0.10	)		$	(0.23	)
Basic net income (loss)		$	1.01			$	0.82			$	0.16			$	(0.89	)		$	(0.32	)
Diluted income (loss) from continuing operations		$	0.99			$	0.54			$	0.11			$	(0.79	)		$	(0.10	)
Diluted income (loss) from discontinued operations		$	—			$	0.28			$	0.04			$	(0.10	)		$	(0.23	)
Diluted net income (loss)		$	0.99			$	0.82			$	0.16			$	(0.89	)		$	(0.32	)
Financial position
Total assets		$	251,916			$	235,185			$	230,738			$	223,083			$	234,944
Long-term debt, net of current maturities		$	1,646			$	2,261			$	3,392			$	5,220			$	6,699
Total stockholders’ equity		$	174,496			$	160,852			$	154,145			$	155,179			$	165,173
Property, plant and equipment
Net property, plant and equipment		$	76,254			$	78,939			$	88,236			$	93,419			$	101,592
Capital expenditures		$	11,404			$	8,884			$	12,001			$	5,921			$	12,037
Depreciation		$	12,784			$	13,625			$	13,650			$	14,923			$	15,867
Performance and other ratios
Gross margin			20.5%				17.6%				17.0%				13.8%				21.4%
Operating margin			5.6%				4.2%				1.1%				(6.4)%				(0.8)%
Total debt to total capitalization			1.4%				2.0%				3.1%				4.2%				4.7%

Please read Item 7 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for specific changes in the Company and its markets that provide context to the above data for the years 2010 through 2012 including, without limitation, discussions concerning (i) how global economic uncertainties have affected the Company’s results; (ii) dispositions of business operations; (iii) asset impairment charges; and (iv) the Company’s effective tax rate. In 2009, changes in the Company that provide context to the above data include the recording of pretax restructuring charges of $5.8 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, within the Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment related to the transfer and consolidation of its Vermont operation into its North Carolina operation. In 2008, changes in the Company that provide context to the above data include the recording of pretax impairment charges related to goodwill and long-lived assets of $17.4 million, or $0.66 per diluted share, and pretax restructuring related charges discussed above, of $1.6 million, or $0.06 per diluted share.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK

Lydall, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company” or “Lydall”) design and manufacture specialty engineered filtration media, industrial thermal insulating solutions, automotive thermal and acoustical barriers, medical filtration media and devices and biopharmaceutical processing components for filtration/separation, thermal/acoustical, and bio/medical applications. Lydall principally conducts its business through three reportable segments: Performance Materials, Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers, with sales globally.

The Performance Materials segment includes filtration media solutions for air, fluid power, and industrial applications (“Industrial Filtration”), air and liquid life science applications (“Life Sciences Filtration”), and industrial thermal insulation solutions for building products, appliances, and energy and industrial markets (“Industrial Thermal Insulation”).

During 2012, the Thermal/Acoustical business reorganized its management reporting structure. Prior to this reorganization, the Thermal/Acoustical business was comprised of one operating segment for financial reporting purposes. The Company now manages and measures its Thermal/Acoustical business performance in two distinct operating segments: Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers. The new segments reflect the way the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker reviews operating results for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance.

The Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment offers a full range of innovative engineered products to assist in noise and heat abatement within the transportation sector. Lydall products are found in underbody (tunnel, fuel tank, exhaust, rear muffler and spare tire) and under hood (engine compartment, turbo charger, and manifolds) of cars, trucks, SUVs, heavy duty trucks and recreational vehicles.

The Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment offers a full line of innovative engineered products to assist in noise and heat abatement within the transportation sector. Lydall products are found in the interior (dash insulators), underbody (wheel well, fuel tank, exhaust) and under hood (engine compartment) of cars, trucks, SUVs, heavy duty trucks and recreational vehicles.

Other Products and Services (“OPS”) is comprised of the Life Sciences Vital Fluids business. Life Sciences Vital Fluids offers specialty products for blood filtration devices, blood transfusion single-use containers and bioprocessing single-use containers and products for containment of media, buffers and bulk intermediates used in biotech, pharmaceutical and diagnostic reagent manufacturing processes.

Highlights

Below are financial highlights comparing Lydall’s 2012 results to its 2011 results:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Performance Materials Segment

The Performance Materials segment reported net sales of $118.0 million in 2012, a decrease of $16.0 million, or 12.0%, compared to 2011. Foreign currency translation negatively impacted net sales by $3.1 million, or 2.3%, in 2012 compared to 2011. A reduction in Industrial Thermal Insulation net sales of $8.9 million primarily contributed to the reduction in segment net sales, as electrical paper products net sales decreased by $6.3 million in 2012 compared to 2011. This reduction was due to the Company selling the electrical papers product line to a customer in 2010 and the customer phasing out orders from Lydall in 2012 as the customer prepared to commence its own manufacturing of electrical paper products. The remaining decrease in net sales was primarily driven by a reduction in demand from the Company’s global air and life sciences filtration customers due to economic conditions.

The segment reported operating income of $10.4 million in 2012, or 8.8% of net sales, compared to operating income of $18.2 million in 2011, or 13.6%. Lower net sales of $16.0 million, change in product mix and lower production negatively impacting absorption of fixed manufacturing costs primarily contributed to a reduction in gross profit. Also, the Company completed services under a License Agreement associated with the sale of the electrical papers product line in the second quarter of 2012 and recognized a gain of $0.8 million in 2012 compared to a gain of $1.6 million in 2011.

Thermal/Acoustical Metals Segment

The Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment reported net sales of $153.9 million in 2012, a decrease of $2.0 million, or 1.3%, compared to 2011. Foreign currency translation negatively impacted net sales by $7.5 million, or 4.8%, in 2012 compared to 2011. Automotive parts net sales decreased by $6.4 million, or 4.5%, in 2012 compared to 2011 due to foreign currency translation. Lower parts net sales from the Company’s European operations were essentially offset by higher net sales of domestic automotive parts. Economic conditions in Europe and Asia contributed to lower demand for certain automotive parts from the Company’s European operations beginning during the second quarter of 2012. Tooling net sales in 2012 increased $4.4 million, or 32.8%, compared to 2011, due to timing of new product launches.

Operating income in 2012 was $14.7 million, or 9.6% of net sales, compared to $15.9 million, or 10.2% of net sales, in 2011. Contributing to this decrease was unfavorable mix in sales between automotive parts and tooling, as tooling net sales, which increased by $4.4 million in 2012 compared to 2011, typically results in lower gross margin.

Thermal/Acoustical Fibers Segment

The Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment reported net sales of $94.4 million in 2012, an increase of $12.7 million, or 15.5%, from 2011. This increase was driven by higher consumer demand for vehicles on Lydall’s existing domestic platforms and new platform awards, as the Company continued to benefit from the overall increase in domestic automobile production, which was up 16.8% in 2012.

The segment reported operating income in 2012 of $12.9 million, or 13.6% of net sales, compared to an operating loss of $3.1 million in 2011. This improvement was due to higher net sales and improved gross margin realized from manufacturing efficiency improvements realized from a comprehensive improvement plan. Significant reductions in scrap, material usage, and labor costs primarily contributed to lower per-unit manufacturing costs in 2012 compared to 2011, which resulted in improved gross margin.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other Products and Services

Life Sciences Vital Fluids net sales for 2012 increased $2.2 million, or 14.9%, compared to 2011, due to higher volumes of blood filtration, blood transfusion and bioprocessing product net sales. The Company realized increased net sales of bioprocessing products of $0.6 million, or 15.1%, as the Company remains focused in growing share in this market.

Life Sciences Vital Fluids reported operating income of $1.2 million, or 7.1% of net sales, in 2012, compared to an operating loss of $1.0 million in 2011. This improvement was due to higher net sales as well as reductions in 2012 to the business’s cost structure in order to better align it with the long qualification cycles in the bioprocessing industry.

Other

On February 7, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a change in the Company’s information technology (“IT”) software and systems strategy. The Company changed its IT software and systems strategy from a previous project, involving an ERP reimplementation, to a project involving an ERP upgrade and some additional applications software. This change was the result of establishing an updated alignment of the Company’s IT strategy with its strategic growth initiatives, and examining cost effective ways of achieving the Company’s overall business objectives.

This new approach is expected to be completed by the Company, at a lower cost, in a shorter time frame, and with less overall business risk. The Company determined that continuing with the original project would result in increases in estimated costs and a significant extension in the time expected to complete the project.

As a result of this change in IT strategy, the Company recorded a $1.8 million asset impairment charge in the quarter ended December 31, 2012. The original project costs were deemed to have no future fair value, and the Board of Director’s decision was in response to conditions that existed at December 31, 2012.

Outlook

The Company remains focused on increasing revenues and margins in all operations through, Lean Six Sigma initiatives, new product development, improving plant capabilities and additional efficiencies. Lydall’s businesses are in markets that the Company believes present long-term growth opportunities through expansion of existing products and through strategic transactions. The Company is committed to providing market driven, value enhancing products, including realizing expected sales growth of Solutech membrane products in the Performance Materials segment as well as continuing the growth in sales of Life Sciences Vital Fluids’ bioprocessing products.

Entering 2013, the Company remains cautiously optimistic despite the continued uncertainty in the macro-economic environment. Instability of the global economy, particularly in Europe and Asia, provides an element of risk and uncertainty in the Company’s near term outlook for the Performance Materials and Thermal/Acoustical Metals segments. However, the Company is beginning to see positive signs in certain markets in the Performance Materials segment for Industrial Thermal Insulation products in the U.S. and Industrial Filtration products in Asia. The Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment is expected to continue to benefit from strong demand in North America on the Company’s existing platforms and sustainable operating efficiency improvements. Net sales of automotive products in the Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segments for 2012 represented approximately 65.5% of Lydall’s consolidated net sales. While net sales are dependent on which automotive platforms the Company serves, overall, an automotive forecasting service is predicting production of automobiles to increase by 1.7% in the U.S. and to decrease by 1.8% in Europe during 2013 compared to 2012.

The Company had $63.6 million of cash on hand at December 31, 2012 and domestic and foreign credit facilities with availability of $44.4 million. The Company remains committed to funding organic growth and capital investment and to pursuing strategic acquisitions.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Sales

In thousands of dollars		2012				Percent Change				2011				Percent Change				2010
Net sales		$	378,924				(1.2)%			$	383,588				21.3	%		$	316,113

Net sales in 2012 decreased $4.7 million, or 1.2%, compared to 2011. Foreign currency translation decreased net sales in 2012 by $10.6 million, or 2.8%, compared to 2011, impacting the Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment’s net sales by $7.5 million, or 4.8%, and the Performance Materials segment’s net sales by $3.1 million, or 2.3%. In the Performance Materials segment, lower sales volumes, lower sales due to the sale of a product line in 2010, and the unfavorable foreign currency translation resulted in lower net sales of $16.0 million in 2012 compared to 2011. In the Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment, unfavorable foreign currency translation resulted in lower net sales of $2.0 million compared to a year ago. The decrease in net sales in the Performance Materials and Thermal/Acoustical Metals segments were partially offset by Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment and OPS increases in net sales. In the Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment, net sales increased $12.7 million, or 15.5%, compared with 2011, primarily due to increased sales volume. In OPS, net sales increased $2.2 million, or 14.9%, primarily due to volume.

Net sales in 2011 increased $67.5 million, or 21.3%, compared to 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to higher sales volumes from the Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment of $27.7 million, or 21.6%, and the Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment of $30.0 million, or 57.9%. In addition, Performance Materials segment net sales in 2011 increased by $10.9 million, or 8.9%, compared to 2010. Net sales of OPS decreased by $0.9 million, or 5.7%. Included in these figures is foreign currency translation, which increased net sales by $6.6 million, or 2.1%, for 2011 compared to 2010, impacting the Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment’s net sales by $4.6 million and the Performance Materials segment’s net sales by $2.0 million.

Gross Profit

In thousands of dollars		2012				2011				2010
Gross profit		$	77,807			$	67,506			$	53,863
Gross margin			20.5%				17.6	%			17.0	%

The increase in gross margin in 2012 compared to 2011 was primarily attributable to the Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment, which reported improved gross margin realized from increased sales and manufacturing efficiency improvements. Partially offsetting the Thermal/Acoustical Fibers gross margin improvement was the Performance Materials segment, which reported lower gross margin due to lower net sales and unfavorable absorption of fixed costs due to lower production. The Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment reported essentially flat gross margin in 2012 compared to 2011, while gross margin for OPS was higher in 2012 compared to 2011 due to an increase in net sales and favorable mix of products.

The increase in gross margin in 2011 compared to 2010 was attributable to the Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment. Improved absorption of fixed costs due to higher net sales and realized manufacturing efficiency improvements and other cost savings contributed to increased gross margin for the Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment. Partially offsetting the gross margin improvement was the Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment which reported lower gross margin due to higher raw material costs, specifically inflation in aluminum and aluminum conversion costs. The Performance Materials segment reported essentially flat gross margin in 2011 compared to 2010, while gross margin for OPS was lower in 2011 compared to 2010 due to lower net sales and unfavorable absorption of fixed costs due to lower production.

Selling, Product Development and Administrative Expenses

In thousands of dollars		2012				2011				2010
Selling, product development and administrative expenses		$	57,239			$	52,937			$	52,890
Percentage of net sales			15.1%				13.8	%			16.7	%

Selling, product development and administrative expenses increased by $4.3 million, or 8.1%, in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase was primarily due to higher expenses incurred by the corporate office and, to a lesser extent, higher salaries and wages. During the fourth quarter

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of 2012, the Company recorded a $1.8 million asset impairment charge due to the abandonment of an ERP project as the original project costs were deemed to have no future fair value. Also contributing to the increase in selling, product development and administrative expenses in 2012 were higher professional services expenses, related to strategic initiatives, of $1.1 million, severance and recruiting charges, of $1.0 million, primarily associated with the departure of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and hiring of the Company’s new Chief Financial Officer, and salaries and wages of $0.7 million. Higher salaries and wages expense in 2012 was primarily caused by annual salary increases. Partially offsetting the increase was $0.2 million in lower sales commission expense. The decrease in net sales in 2012, compared to 2011, caused the decrease in sales commission expense in 2012. Foreign currency translation decreased selling, product development and administrative expenses by $1.1 million, or 2.0%, for 2012 compared to 2011.

Selling, product development and administrative expenses in 2011 were essentially flat with 2010. Reductions in legal expenses of $0.9 million and severance related charges of $1.0 million were offset by increases in sales commission expense of $0.8 million, workers compensation charges of $0.5 million and salaries and wages expense of $0.3 million, as well as increases in other discretionary spending. Higher legal expenses in 2010 were primarily related to litigation and settlement costs with a former employee. The increase in net sales in 2011, compared to 2010, caused the increase in sales commission expense in 2011. Higher salaries and wages expense in 2011 was primarily caused by annual salary increases.

Gain on Sale of Product Line

In thousands of dollars		2012				2011				2010
Gain on sale of product line		$	810			$	1,619			$	2,542

On June 30, 2010, the Company divested its electrical papers product line business, included in the Performance Materials segment, for total consideration of $5.8 million, of which $4.8 million was paid on June 30, 2010, with the remaining $1.0 million paid in accordance with a License Agreement on July 2, 2012. This transaction contained multiple deliverables, some of which were delivered on June 30, 2010, while others were delivered in subsequent periods. The Company deferred $3.2 million of the gain from this sale related to undelivered elements of the transaction at June 30, 2010. As part of the sale transaction, the Company entered into a Manufacturing Agreement and a License Agreement with the buyer. Under the Manufacturing Agreement, the Company was obligated to manufacture and sell electrical paper products to the buyer for a two-year period. Pursuant to the License Agreement, treated as a separate unit of accounting, the Company granted the buyer the right to use certain process technology and provided certain services to the buyer to facilitate the transfer of know-how for the manufacture of electrical paper products.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded a $2.5 million gain related to this transaction. This gain was comprised of the gain on sale of $1.7 million recognized in the second quarter of 2010, net of a write-off of $0.8 million of goodwill that was allocated to the electrical papers product line, and income of $0.8 million recognized during the six months ended December 31, 2010 as the Company provided services to the buyer in accordance with the terms of the License Agreement. The deferred gain amount was recognized as income as services under the License Agreement were delivered in periods subsequent to the sale, including $1.6 million recognized in 2011 and $0.8 million in 2012. As of June 30, 2012, the Company satisfied its obligations under the License Agreement.

Discontinued Operations, net of tax

On June 29, 2011, the Company sold its Affinity business for $15.2 million in cash. Affinity designed and manufactured high precision, specialty engineered temperature-control equipment for semiconductor, pharmaceutical, life sciences and industrial applications. The Company recorded a gain on sale, net of transaction costs and income taxes of $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

In thousands of dollars		2012				2011				2010
Net sales		$	—			$	13,255			$	21,894
Income before income taxes			—				1,374				1,155
Income tax expense			—				499				415
Income from discontinued operations			—				875				740
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax of $2,229			—				3,857				—
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		$	—			$	4,732			$	740

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Interest Expense

In thousands of dollars		2012				2011				2010
Interest expense		$	365			$	880			$	854
Weighted average interest rate during the year			5.4%				5.4%				5.3%

Interest expense was lower in 2012 compared to 2011 due to decreased amortization of debt financing costs associated with the Company’s domestic revolving credit facility entered into in June 2011 and decreases in unused borrowing fees, as well as lower average principal balances on capital lease obligations.

Interest expense was higher in 2011 compared to 2010 due to fully amortizing debt financing costs of $0.3 million associated with the Company’s prior domestic revolving credit facility that was terminated by the Company during the second quarter of 2011, partially offset by lower average principal balances on capital lease obligations.

Other Income and Expense

In thousands of dollars		2012				2011				2010
Other expense (income), net		$	31			$	(94)			$	(110)

The amounts included in other expense (income), net, in all years presented are primarily related to insignificant activity related to foreign currency transaction gains and losses and interest income.

Income Taxes from Continuing Operations

		2012				2011				2010
Effective income tax rate			19.9%				41.3%				31.5%

The Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations for 2012 was 19.9% compared to 41.3% in 2011 and 31.5% in 2010. For 2012, the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations and the statutory federal income tax rate was primarily caused by the release of valuation allowances against foreign tax credit carryovers of $3.9 million and state net operating loss carryovers, partially offset by additional valuation allowance against a foreign net deferred tax asset. The $3.9 million reversal of valuation allowances against foreign tax credit carryovers included $2.9 million of foreign tax credits to be used to offset 2012 U.S. federal income taxes and $1.0 million to benefit future periods. The Company’s state income taxes in 2012 were offset by the reversal of valuation allowances against state net operating loss carryovers of $0.5 million as the Company will use certain state net operating loss carryovers to offset 2012 and 2013 state income taxes. During 2012, the Company increased its valuation allowance against a foreign deferred tax asset in the Netherlands by $0.7 million as future realization of such tax benefit was not reasonably assured.

The Company’s expects its effective tax rate from continuing operations for 2013 to approximate statutory income tax rates.

The Company maintains valuation allowances against certain deferred tax assets where realization is not reasonably assured. The Company evaluates the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets and reduces the carrying amount to the extent it believes a portion will not be realized. The Company’s effective tax rates in future periods could be affected by earnings being lower or higher than anticipated in countries where tax rates differ from the United States federal rate, the relative impact of permanent tax adjustments on higher or lower earnings from domestic operations, changes in net deferred tax asset valuation allowances, completion of acquisitions or divestitures, changes in tax rates or tax laws and the completion of tax audits.

The Company has been relying on proposed regulations that were issued in 2008 for its tax accounting policy regarding deduction versus capitalization of repairs related to tangible property. On December 23, 2011, the IRS issued temporary regulations that would go into effect for years beginning on or after January 1, 2012 to replace the proposed regulations. On December 14, 2012, the regulations were amended to allow a taxpayer to choose to delay the effective date to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The IRS anticipates publishing final regulations on the deduction versus capitalization of repairs related to tangible property during 2013, and changes to the temporary

TABLE OF CONTENTS

regulations are anticipated. The Company has not yet completed an analysis of the potential impact of the change. However, these regulations are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

For 2011, the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations and the statutory federal income tax rate was primarily caused by valuation allowances against foreign tax credit carryovers, a valuation allowance against a foreign net deferred tax asset, and dividends from a foreign subsidiary.

For 2010, the Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations was significantly impacted by a tax benefit of $4.0 million associated with a change in assertion regarding unremitted foreign earnings related to its German branch. This was offset by valuation allowances against foreign tax credit carryovers and state net operating loss carryovers, as future realization was not reasonably assured, that generated tax expense of $3.0 million and $0.9 million of tax expense associated with dividends from a foreign subsidiary. The impact of those items and a reduction in reserves for tax contingencies contributed to the Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations differing from the statutory federal income tax rate in 2010.

The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return, as well as returns required by various state and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities, including such major jurisdictions as the United States, France, Germany and the Netherlands. Within the next fiscal year, the Company expects to conclude certain U.S. federal income tax matters through the year ended December 31, 2009 and it is reasonably expected that net unrecognized benefits of $0.5 million may be recognized. The total amount of net unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the effective tax rate if recognized was $0.7 million as of December 31, 2012. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal examinations for years before 2006, state and local examinations for years before 2002, and non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before 2003.

SEGMENT RESULTS

Consolidated Net Sales		For the Years Ended December 31,
In thousands		2012				2011				2010
Performance Materials Segment:
Industrial Filtration		$	68,379			$	72,888			$	71,480
Industrial Thermal Insulation			38,449				47,299				38,951
Life Sciences Filtration			11,207				13,872				12,704
Performance Materials Segment net sales			118,035				134,059				123,135
Thermal/Acoustical Metals Segment:
Metal parts		$	136,276			$	142,646			$	110,085
Tooling			17,645				13,290				18,196
Thermal/Acoustical Metals Segment net sales			153,921				155,936				128,281
Thermal/Acoustical Fibers Segment:
Fiber parts			93,519				79,631				49,326
Tooling			917				2,116				2,441
Thermal/Acoustical Fibers Segment net sales			94,436				81,747				51,767
Other Products and Services:
Life Sciences Vital Fluids		$	16,853			$	14,670			$	15,562
Other Products and Services net sales			16,853				14,670				15,562
Eliminations and Other			(4,321	)			(2,824	)			(2,632	)
Consolidated Net Sales		$	378,924			$	383,588			$	316,113

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Operating Income from Continuing Operations		For the Years Ended December 31,
In thousands		2012				2011				2010
Performance Materials Segment		$	10,400			$	18,194			$	17,247
Thermal/Acoustical Metals Segment			14,708				15,915				11,853
Thermal/Acoustical Fibers Segment			12,851				(3,055	)			(11,407	)
Other Products and Services:
Life Sciences Vital Fluids			1,190				(1,040	)			(131	)
Corporate Office Expenses			(17,771	)			(13,826	)			(14,047	)
Consolidated Operating Income from Continuing Operations		$	21,378			$	16,188			$	3,515

Performance Materials Segment

Segment net sales decreased by $16.0 million, or 12.0%, in 2012 compared to 2011, due to decreased sales volumes and the negative impact of foreign currency translation of $3.1 million, or 2.3%. A reduction in Industrial Thermal Insulation net sales of $8.9 million, or 18.7%, primarily contributed to the reduction in net sales. This reduction was due to the Company selling the electrical papers product line to a customer in 2010. The Company sold $6.3 million less electrical paper products to this customer in 2012 compared to 2011, as the customer prepared to commence its own manufacturing of electrical paper products. Also impacting Industrial Thermal Insulation net sales was a decrease in demand and customers adjusting inventory levels on certain commercial building products. Net sales of Industrial Filtration products decreased by $4.5 million, or 6.2%, in 2012 compared to 2011, due to a reduction in demand for its products in Europe and Asia markets as well as foreign currency translation decreasing net sales $3.1 million. Net sales of Life Sciences Filtration products decreased by $2.7 million, or 19.2%, in 2012 compared to 2011, primarily due to decreased demand for products used in water and life protection application products.

The Performance Materials segment reported operating income of $10.4 million in 2012, or 8.8% of net sales, compared to operating income of $18.2 million, or 13.6% of net sales in 2011. The decrease in operating income was driven primarily by lower net sales of $16.0 million, lower absorption of fixed overhead costs and unfavorable mix among product sales. Operating income in 2012 and 2011 also includes a $0.8 million and $1.6 million gain, respectively, from services provided to the buyer of the electrical papers product line in accordance with the terms of a License Agreement.

Segment net sales increased by $10.9 million, or 8.9%, in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily from volume growth and, to a lesser extent, marginal increases in prices of certain products. Net sales of Industrial Filtration products increased by $1.4 million, or 2.0%, in 2011 compared to 2010, due to foreign currency translation of $1.7 million. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2011, the segment began to see a reduction in demand from the European and Asian Industrial Filtration markets as OEMs cautiously managed inventory levels as they evaluated their markets and demand for their products during a period of economic uncertainty. As a result, net sales of Industrial Filtration products decreased by $4.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 compared to the fourth quarter of 2010. Net sales of Industrial Thermal Insulation products increased by $8.3 million, or 21.4%, in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily from improvement in customer capital project investments across all markets, resulting in increased demand for the Company’s products. Net sales of Life Sciences Filtration products increased by $1.2 million, or 9.2%, in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily due to increased volumes of products sold for respiration and life protection applications.

The Performance Materials segment reported operating income of $18.2 million in 2011, or 13.6% of net sales, compared to operating income of $17.2 million, or 14.0%, of net sales in 2010. This increase in operating income was driven primarily by higher net sales, partially offset by higher selling, product development and administrative expenses of $0.9 million. Operating income in 2011 and 2010 also includes a $1.6 million and $2.5 million gain, respectively, associated with the sale of a product line. Higher expenses were primarily related to increases in selling expenses of $0.6 million and added costs associated with product development of $0.2 million.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Thermal/Acoustical Metals Segment

Segment net sales decreased by $2.0 million, or 1.3%, in 2012 compared to 2011. Foreign currency translation negatively impacted net sales by $7.5 million, or 4.8%, in 2012 compared to 2011. Automotive parts net sales in 2012 decreased by $6.4 million, or 4.5%, compared to 2011 due to unfavorable foreign currency translation of $6.6 million. Lower parts sales volume from the Company’s European operations was offset by higher parts sales volume of domestic automotive parts. Economic conditions in Europe and Asia contributed to lower demand for certain automotive parts from the Company’s European operations beginning during the second quarter of 2012. Tooling net sales in 2012 increased $4.4 million, or 32.8%, compared to 2011, due to timing of new product launches.

The Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment reported operating income of $14.7 million in 2012, or 9.6% of net sales, compared to operating income of $15.9 million, or 10.2% of net sales, in 2011. Contributing to this decrease was unfavorable mix in sales between automotive parts and tooling, as tooling net sales, which increased by $4.4 million in 2012 compared to 2011, typically results in lower gross margin.

Segment net sales increased by $27.7 million, or 21.6%, in 2011 compared to 2010. Foreign currency translation negatively impacted net sales by $4.5 million, or 3.5%, in 2011 compared to 2010. An increase in automotive parts net sales of $32.6 million, or 29.6%, compared to 2011 was driven by higher consumer demand for vehicles on the Company’s existing domestic platforms and new platform awards. Tooling net sales in 2011 decreased $4.9 million, or 27.0%, compared to 2010, due to timing of new product launches.

The Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment reported operating income of $15.9 million in 2011, or 10.2% of net sales, compared to operating income of $11.9 million, or 9.2% of net sales in 2010. Higher net sales and improved absorption of fixed costs contributed to the increased operating income. Also contributing to this increase was favorable mix in sales between automotive parts and tooling, as tooling net sales, which decreased by $4.9 million in 2011 compared to 2010, typically results in lower gross margin.

Thermal/Acoustical Fibers Segment

Segment net sales increased by $12.7 million, or 15.5%, in 2012 compared to 2011. Automotive parts net sales increased by $13.9 million, or 17.4%, in 2012 compared to 2011. This increase was driven by higher consumer demand for vehicles on the Company’s existing domestic platforms and new platform awards, as the Company continued to benefit from the overall increase in domestic automobile production, which was up 16.8% in 2012. Tooling net sales in 2012 decreased $1.2 million, or 56.7%, compared to 2011, due to timing of new product launches.

The Thermal/Acoustical Fibers Segment reported operating income of $12.9 million in 2012, or 13.6% of net sales, compared to an operating loss of $3.1 million in 2011. This improvement was due to higher net sales and improved gross margin realized from manufacturing efficiency improvements. These manufacturing improvements began in the second half of 2011 and continued through 2012. Significant reductions in scrap, material usage, and labor primarily contributed to lower per-unit manufacturing costs in 2012 compared to 2011.

Segment net sales increased by $30.0 million, or 57.9%, in 2011 compared to 2010. Automotive parts net sales increased by $30.3 million, or 61.4%, in 2011 compared to 2010. This increase was driven by higher consumer demand for vehicles on the Company’s existing domestic platforms and new platform awards. Tooling net sales in 2011 decreased $0.3 million, or 13.3%, compared to 2010, due to timing of new product launches.

The Thermal/Acoustical Fibers Segment reported an operating loss of $3.1 million in 2011, compared to an operating loss of $11.4 million in 2010. This improvement was due to higher net sales and improved gross margin realized from manufacturing efficiency improvements. These manufacturing improvements began in the second half of 2011 and continued through the end of 2011. Significant reductions in scrap, material usage, and labor costs primarily contributed to lower per-unit manufacturing costs in 2011 compared to 2010, resulting in improved gross margin.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other Products and Services

Life Sciences Vital Fluids net sales increased $2.2 million, or 14.9%, in 2012 compared to 2011, which were primarily attributed to higher volumes of blood filtration, blood transfusion and bioprocessing product net sales and, to a lesser extent, price increases.

Life Sciences Vital Fluids reported operating income of $1.2 million in 2012, or 7.1% of net sales, compared to an operating loss of $1.0 million, or 7.1% of net sales, in 2011. This improvement was due to higher net sales as well as reductions in 2012 to the business’s cost structure in order to better align it with the long qualification cycles in the bioprocessing industry.

Life Sciences Vital Fluids net sales decreased by $0.9 million, or 5.7%, in 2011 compared to 2010, which were primarily attributed to lower volumes of blood filtration and transfusion product net sales.

Life Sciences Vital Fluids reported an operating loss of $1.0 million in 2011, compared to an operating loss of $0.1 million in 2010. The reduction in net sales and lower absorption of fixed costs negatively impacted operating results for this business.

Corporate Office Expenses

The increase in corporate office expenses of $3.9 million in 2012 compared to 2011 was due to a $1.5 million asset impairment charge, higher professional services expenses of $0.9 million, primarily related to strategic initiatives, and severance and recruiting charges of $1.0 million primarily associated with the departure of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and hiring of the new Chief Financial Officer. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company recorded a $1.8 million asset impairment charge ($1.5 million in corporate office expenses) due to the abandonment of an ERP project as the original project costs were deemed to have no future fair value.

The decrease in corporate office expenses of $0.2 million in 2011 compared to 2010 was principally due to lower legal and settlement costs of $1.0 million, which primarily resulted from the settlement of litigation with a former employee in 2010, partially offset by higher employee benefit costs of $0.6 million primarily associated with worker’s compensation expenses.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

		For the Year Ended December 31,
In thousands except ratio data		2012				2011				2010
Cash and cash equivalents		$	63,623			$	30,905			$	24,988
Short-term investment		$	—			$	12,015			$	—
Cash provided by operating activities		$	34,405			$	14,657			$	10,718
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities		$	1,611			$	(6,309	)		$	(6,229	)
Cash used for financing activities		$	(3,871	)		$	(1,621	)		$	(1,404	)
Depreciation and amortization		$	13,572			$	14,478			$	14,407
Capital expenditures		$	(11,404	)		$	(8,884	)		$	(12,001	)
Total debt		$	2,411			$	3,296			$	4,888
Total capitalization (debt plus equity)		$	176,907			$	164,148			$	159,033
Total debt to total capitalization			1.4%				2.0	%			3.1	%

The Company assesses its liquidity in terms of its ability to generate cash to fund operating, investing and financing activities. The principal source of liquidity is operating cash flows. In addition to operating cash flows, other significant factors that affect the overall management of liquidity include capital expenditures, investments in businesses, acquisitions and divestitures, income tax payments, pension funding and availability of lines of credit and long-term financing. The Company manages worldwide cash requirements considering available funds among domestic and foreign subsidiaries.

At December 31, 2012, the Company held $63.6 million in cash and cash equivalents the majority of which was held by domestic subsidiaries.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Operating Cash Flows

Net cash provided by operating activities in 2012 was $34.4 million compared with $14.7 million in 2011. This increase was primarily due to a decrease in operating assets and liabilities of $3.0 million in 2012, compared to an increase of $11.3 million in 2011, a change of $14.3 million, and an improvement in net income of $3.0 million. The decrease in operating assets and liabilities in 2012 was primarily due to a decrease in inventory of $2.7 million. Inventory decreased due to lower production activity at the end of 2012 compared to the end of 2011 and concentrated efforts to reduce levels of raw material inventory.

Net cash provided by operating activities in 2011 was $14.7 million compared with $10.7 million in 2010. The increase in cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 was primarily due to an improvement in net income of $11.1 million. In 2011, operating assets and liabilities increased by $11.3 million, primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable and a decrease in accounts payable of $4.1 million and $3.9 million, respectively. This increase in accounts receivable was primarily from higher sales levels. The decrease in accounts payable was primarily due to timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2011 compared to the end of 2010.

Investing Cash Flows

Net cash provided by investing activities was $1.6 million in 2012 compared to net cash used for investing activities of $6.3 million in 2011. Capital expenditures in 2012 were $11.4 million compared to $8.9 million in 2011, as management continued to judiciously manage its capital expenditures while remaining committed to new product development and growth opportunities. Investing activities in 2012 included the receipt of $1.0 million in remaining proceeds from the 2010 sale of its electrical papers product line. Investing activities in 2011 included the net proceeds of $14.0 million from the sale of Affinity. A portion of those proceeds, $12.0 million, were invested in 2011 in a short term investment that matured on January 23, 2012 and became available to fund operating, investing, or financing activities. In 2011, the Company received $0.8 million from a leasing company as a result of sale-leaseback transactions for equipment.

Net cash used for investing activities was $6.3 million in 2011 compared with $6.2 million in 2010. Capital expenditures in 2011 were $8.9 million compared to $12.0 million in 2010, as management continued to cautiously manage its capital expenditures while remaining committed to new product development and growth opportunities. Investing activities in 2011 included the net proceeds of $14.0 million from the sale of Affinity. A portion of those proceeds, $12.0 million, were invested in 2011 in a short term investment that matured on January 23, 2012 and became available to fund operating, investing, or financing activities. Investing activities in 2010 included the net proceeds of $4.8 million from the sale of its electrical papers product line. In 2011 and 2010, the Company received $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively, from a leasing company as a result of sale-leaseback transactions for equipment.

Financing Cash Flows

In 2012, net cash used for financing activities was $3.9 million compared with net cash used for financing activities of $1.6 million in 2011. Debt payments and capital lease payments were $1.1 million in 2012 compared to $1.5 million in 2011. In 2012, the Company spent $4.0 million repurchasing shares of its Common Stock compared to $0.2 million in 2011. The Company received $1.0 million from the exercise of stock options in 2012, compared to $0.1 million received in 2011.

In 2011, net cash used for financing activities was $1.6 million compared with net cash used for financing activities of $1.4 million in 2010. Debt payments and capital lease payments were $1.5 million in 2011 compared to $1.4 million in 2010.

Financing Arrangements

On June 16, 2011, the Company entered into a $35.0 million senior secured revolving domestic credit facility (“Domestic Credit Facility”) with a financial institution, which replaced the Company’s prior $35.0 million domestic credit facility that was terminated by the Company. The Domestic Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. The maturity date for the Domestic Credit Facility is June 15, 2016. The Company had no borrowings under the Domestic Credit Facility during 2012 and no outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2012, the Company has availability of $32.5 million under the Domestic Credit Facility, net of standby letters of credit outstanding of $2.5 million.

The loan agreement governing the Domestic Credit Facility contains a number of affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants. The Company is required to meet a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The fixed charge coverage ratio requires that, at the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

end of each fiscal quarter, the ratio of consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the loan agreement, to fixed charges may not be less than 1 to 1 for the immediately preceding 12 month period. In addition, the Company must maintain a Consolidated Leverage Ratio, as defined, as of the end of each fiscal quarter of no greater than 2.5 to 1.0. The Company must also meet a minimum consolidated EBITDA of $15.0 million through September 30, 2014 and $25.0 million thereafter. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Interest is charged on borrowings at the Company’s option of either: (i) Base Rate plus the Applicable Rate, or (ii) the Eurodollar Rate plus the Applicable Rate. The Base Rate is a fluctuating rate equal to the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus .50%, (b) the prime rate as set by the financial institution, and (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.0%. The Eurodollar Rate is a fluctuating LIBOR rate as set by the British Bankers Association, or if such rate is not available, the rate that would be offered by the financial institution’s London Branch to major banks in the London interbank Eurodollar market for deposits in the relevant currency. The Applicable Rate is determined based on the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio, as defined. The Applicable Rate added to the Base Rate ranges from 75 basis points to 175 basis points, and the Applicable Rate added to the Eurodollar ranges from 175 basis points to 275 basis points. A loan that has an interest rate based on the Eurodollar Rate that is lent from the financial institution’s office in the United Kingdom or certain European Union countries is subject to an additional variable interest rate. The Company pays a quarterly fee equal to the Applicable Rate multiplied by the actual daily unused portion of the credit facility.

On September 30, 2011, the Company, through a foreign subsidiary, entered into a new €8.0 million foreign credit facility (“Foreign Credit Facility”), with €6.0 million available for borrowings and €2.0 million available to fund letters of credit. This Foreign Credit Facility replaced the prior foreign credit facility that expired on September 30, 2011. The Foreign Credit Facility, which has a maturity date of September 30, 2014, was completed with the same group of banking institutions and under similar terms and conditions to those in place under the prior credit facility. At December 31, 2012, the Company’s foreign subsidiaries’ various credit arrangements with banks totaled €9.0 million (approximately $11.9 million) all of which was available for borrowings, primarily restricted to borrowings by the respective foreign subsidiary. The Company’s foreign subsidiaries had no borrowings outstanding on any of its credit arrangements at December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2011, the Company’s foreign subsidiaries had no borrowings outstanding on any of its credit arrangements other than outstanding standby letters of credit.

Future Cash Requirements

The Company manages worldwide cash requirements considering available funds among domestic and foreign subsidiaries. The Company expects to fund its operating cash requirements from existing cash balances, cash generated by operations, and through borrowings, as needed, under its existing domestic and foreign credit facilities. The Company continually explores its core markets for suitable acquisitions, joint ventures, alliances and licensing agreements. If completed, such activities would be financed with existing cash balances, cash generated from operations, under the credit facilities described under “Financing Arrangements” above or other forms of financing, as required.

At December 31, 2012, total indebtedness, of which the majority was capital leases, was $2.4 million, or 1.4% of the Company’s total capital structure. Cash requirements for 2013 are expected to include the funding of ongoing operations, capital expenditures, payments due on capital and operating leases, pension plan contributions, income tax payments and debt service.

Capital spending for 2013 is expected to be approximately $14.0 million to $15.0 million. The funded status of the Company’s domestic defined benefit pension plan is dependent upon many factors, including returns on invested assets, levels of market interest rates and levels of contributions to the plan. The Company expects to contribute $1.2 million to its domestic defined benefit pension plan during 2013.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the Company’s significant obligations as of December 31, 2012 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on the Company’s liquidity and cash flows in future periods:

		Payments Due by Period
In thousands		2013				2014				2015				2016				2017				After 5 years				Total
Contractual Obligations:
Pension plan contributions		$	1,241			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	1,241
Operating leases			3,014				1,888				1,294				1,194				1,081				799				9,270
Capital leases*			805				707				707				345				1				—				2,565
Long-term debt*			63				—				—				—				—				—				63
Total Contractual Obligations		$	5,123			$	2,595			$	2,001			$	1,539			$	1,082			$	799			$	13,139

The Company has a capital lease agreement for the land and building at the St. Nazaire, France operating facility, included in the Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment, requiring monthly principal and interest payments until 2016. The capital lease provides an option for the Company to purchase the land and building at the end of the lease for a nominal amount.

In 2011, the Company entered into operating leases for manufacturing equipment, included in the Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segment. As of December 31, 2012, the estimated future minimum payments for this equipment are $4.5 million through the first quarter of 2018, or annual payments of approximately $0.7 million to $1.0 million.

The Company had a capital lease agreement for a high speed manufacturing line at its German operation, included in the Thermal/Acoustical Metals segment. The lease had monthly principal and interest payments until the first quarter of 2012. The Company purchased the equipment as permitted by the lease agreement.

The above table does not reflect net tax contingencies of $0.7 million, the timing of which is uncertain. Refer to Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion on unrecognized tax benefits. Purchase orders or contracts for normal purchases of raw materials and other goods and services are not included in the table above. The Company is not able to determine the aggregate amount of such purchase orders that represent contractual obligations, as purchase orders may represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements. For purposes of this table, contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on the Company and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transactions. The Company does not have significant agreements for the purchase of raw materials or other goods specifying minimum quantities or set prices that exceed expected requirements.

Not included in the table above, on February 22, 2013, the Company renewed an operating lease in Yadkinville, NC which will result in estimated future minimum rental payments of $1.9 million until 2018, with estimated annual payments of approximately $0.3 million to $0.4 million.

The Company’s long-term debt payments and interest rates for all of the Company’s outstanding debt were fixed as of December 31, 2012. Actual payments may vary significantly from those included in the table above depending on future debt levels, timing of debt repayments and sources of funding utilized.

The Company’s future pension plan contributions relate to the remaining contributions required for the 2012 plan year and the minimum contributions for the 2013 plan year based on the Company’s pension plan valuations at December 31, 2012. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Company’s pension plans.

In addition to the above contractual obligations, the Company utilizes letters of credit in the ordinary course of business for security deposit requirements. Outstanding letters of credit were $2.5 million and $2.4 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Note 1 in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company’s management is required to make judgments about and estimates of the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates. The most significant areas involving management judgments and estimates are described below.

Goodwill

The Company had goodwill of $18.3 million at December 31, 2012 and $18.1 million at December 31, 2011. Goodwill is not amortized, but rather is subject to impairment tests annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. The identification and measurement of goodwill impairment involves the estimation of the fair value of reporting units, including related goodwill. The Company’s reporting units are operating segments or components of operating segments for which discrete financial information is available and management regularly reviews the operating results of that operating segment or component. ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) — Testing Goodwill for Impairment, permits a company to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. The more likely than not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. If after assessing qualitative factors a conclusion is reached that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the Company is required to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. In the first step, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of its net assets, goodwill is considered not impaired and no further testing is required. If the carrying value of the net assets exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, a second step of the impairment test is performed in order to determine the implied fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill. Determining the implied fair value of goodwill requires a valuation of the reporting unit's tangible and intangible assets and liabilities in a manner similar to the allocation of purchase price in a business combination. If the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of its goodwill, goodwill is deemed impaired and is written down to the extent of the difference.

During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company performed its annual impairment analysis of the $13.6 million of goodwill in the Performance Materials reporting unit (PM reporting unit) and $4.7 million of goodwill in the Life Sciences Vital Fluids reporting unit (VF reporting unit), included in OPS.

After considering changes to assumptions used in the Company’s most recent quantitative annual testing, including the capital markets environment, economic conditions, industry trends, changes in results of operations, the magnitude of the excess of fair value over the carrying amount of the PM reporting unit, and other factors, the Company concluded it was not necessary to perform the two-step impairment test for the PM reporting unit as it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the PM reporting unit was less than its carrying value. As a result, the Company concluded that the PM reporting unit goodwill was not impaired.

The Company performed a quantitative two step approach to test the VF reporting unit for impairment due to the results of the 2011 impairment analysis and historical financial results. During 2012, the VF reporting unit met the discounted cash flow projections included in the 2011 income approach calculation, primarily as a result of sales growth. For 2012, the Company used both the income approach and market approach in performing step one of the impairment analysis to estimate the fair value of the VF reporting unit. The Company determined that the VF reporting unit, with $4.7 million of goodwill, had excess fair value over its carrying value, and as a result, step two of the impairment test was not required.

In performing step one of the impairment analysis to estimate the fair value of the VF reporting unit for 2012, the Company used both: (i) the income approach — discounted cash flows, and (ii) the market approach — comparable company analysis. The income approach involved determining the present value of future cash flows from the reporting unit’s projected financial results in 2013 – 2015 and the projected cash

TABLE OF CONTENTS

flows beyond that three year period computed as the terminal value. The Company believes the income approach was appropriate because it provided a fair value estimate based upon the reporting unit’s expected long-term operations and cash flow performance.

In applying the market approach, valuation multiples were derived from historic and projected operating data of selected guideline companies, which were evaluated and adjusted, if necessary, based on the strengths and weaknesses of the reporting unit relative to the selected guideline companies. The valuation multiples were then applied to the appropriate projected operating data of the reporting unit to arrive at an indication of fair value. The Company believes the market approach was appropriate because it provided a fair value using multiples from companies with operations and economic characteristics similar to its reporting unit.

The estimates of fair value of reporting units are based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment, which incorporate management assumptions about expected future cash flows, as well as other factors such as market capitalization and other market information. Future cash flows can be affected by numerous factors including changes in economic, industry or market conditions, changes in the underlying business or products of the reporting unit, changes in competition and changes in technology. Any changes in key assumptions about the business and its prospects, changes in any of the factors discussed above or other factors could affect the fair value of one or more of the reporting units resulting in an impairment charge. If future operating performance in the VF reporting unit does not reasonably meet expectations or other key assumptions change or are not met, then a non-cash impairment charge to income from operations could occur.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on the Company's judgment and estimates of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of the asset. If the carrying values of the assets are determined to be impaired, then the carrying values are reduced to their estimated fair values. The fair values of the impaired assets are determined based on market conditions, including independent appraisals when appropriate, the income approach, which utilizes cash flow projections, and other factors.

During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company performed an impairment analysis for long-lived assets at the Company’s Solutech operation, included in the Performance Materials segment. Negative cash flows in 2012 combined with historical operating losses contributed to testing the Solutech asset group for recoverability. Acquisition related intangibles with a remaining useful life of six years primarily comprise the carrying value of the asset group of $4.7 million. Negative cash flows are a result of a delay in commercialization of Solutech products to the market place by Solutech’s customers. To determine the recoverability of the Solutech asset group, the Company completed an undiscounted cash flow analysis and compared it to the asset group carrying value. This analysis was completed over the period 2013 – 2018 and is dependent on the expected increase of net sales over the period when the business has technological exclusivity provided by the intangible assets.

The Company determined that the Solutech asset group had undiscounted cash flow in excess of its carrying value, and as a result, the asset group was not impaired at December 31, 2012. The estimate of undiscounted cash flows of the Solutech long-lived asset group was based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment, which incorporated management assumptions about expected future cash flows, as well as other market information. Based on 2012 developments with Solutech customers and the expectation of sales growth with other OEMs, the Company expects to meet the cash flow forecasts included in the impairment analysis. Future cash flows are dependent on the success of commercialization efforts of Solutech products by OEMs, the quality of Solutech products and technology advancements. Small changes in future operating results, compared to projections in the cash flow analysis, could result in a future non-cash impairment charge to income from operations.

Pensions

Pension cost and the related obligations recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements are determined on an actuarial basis. The determination of such amounts is made in consultation with the Company’s outside actuaries based on information and assumptions provided by the Company. A substantial portion of the Company’s pension amounts relate to its domestic defined benefit pension plan.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pension plans outside the United States are not significant at December 31, 2012. The domestic defined benefit pension plan, which covers certain domestic Lydall employees, is noncontributory and benefits are based on either years of service or eligible compensation paid while a participant is in a plan. The plan is closed to new employees and benefits under the pension plan are no longer accruing.

A significant element in determining the Company’s pension cost is the expected return on plan assets. Based on a review of market trends, actual returns on plan assets and other factors, including the allocation of the Company’s investment between equity and fixed income funds, the Company’s expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was lowered to 7.50% at December 31, 2012, which will be utilized for determining 2013 pension cost. An expected long-term rate of return of 7.75% was used for determining 2012 pension expense and 8.0% in determining 2011 and 2010 pension expense. In determining the expected return on plan assets, the Company considers the relative weighting of plan assets, the historical performance of marketable debt and equity securities and economic and other indicators of future performance. Investment management objectives include maintaining an adequate level of diversification to balance market risk and to provide sufficient liquidity for near-term payments of benefits accrued under the plan and to pay the expenses of administration. The investment plan assets are stated at fair value, which is based on quoted market prices in an active market. The expected long-term rate of return on assets is applied to the value of plan assets at the beginning of the year and this produces the expected return on plan assets that is included in the determination of pension cost for that year. The difference between this expected return and the actual return on plan assets is deferred, within certain parameters, as discussed below. The Company continually evaluates its expected long-term rate of return and will adjust such rate as deemed appropriate.

At the end of each year, the Company determines the discount rate to be used to calculate the present value of plan liabilities, as well as the following year’s pension cost. The discount rate is an estimate of the current interest rate at which the pension liabilities could be effectively settled at the end of the year. The Company based its discount rate assumption on an analysis which included the selection of a bond portfolio comprised of high quality fixed income investments whose cash flows would provide for the projected benefit payments of the plan. The discount rate is then developed as the single rate that equates the market value of the bond portfolio to the discounted value of the plan's benefit payments. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company determined this rate to be 4.16% and 5.0%, respectively. Increases or decreases in the discount rate result in decreases and increases, respectively, in the projected benefit obligation. The net effect on pension liabilities from changes in the discount rate is deferred within certain parameters, as discussed below.

Pension accounting guidance requires that gains or losses be deferred unless the unrecognized net gain or loss at the end of a year exceeds a “corridor” (as defined in the pension accounting guidance). If the deferred gain or loss exceeds the corridor at the end of the year, then the amount in excess of the corridor is amortized over a period equal to the average remaining service period of active employees expected to receive benefits. Since benefit accruals were frozen on certain domestic defined benefit pension plans on June 30, 2006, these plan participants are considered inactive participants. Therefore, the gain/loss amortization for these plans is amortized over the average remaining life expectancy of all plan participants. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the net deferred loss exceeded the corridor. Consequently, pension cost for 2013 will include amortization of a portion of the deferred loss in excess of the corridor. The amount of amortization in future years will be dependent on changes in the components of the deferred loss amount, particularly actual return on plan assets in relation to the estimated return on plan assets, as well as future increases or decreases in the discount rate.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recognized pension expense related to its domestic defined benefit pension plan of $0.9 million as a result of the expected return on assets being lower than the aggregate of interest cost and the amortization of actuarial loss. As discussed above, the Company’s discount rate was 4.16% at December 31, 2012 and will be used for purposes of determining 2013 pension cost. Pension expense for 2013 is expected to be in the range of $0.8 million to $0.9 million.

The Company contributed $2.1 million to its domestic defined benefit pension plan during 2012 and expects to contribute approximately $1.2 million in 2013.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, the Company analyzes historical financial results by jurisdiction and estimates future taxable income, considering the feasibility of ongoing tax planning strategies and the realizability of tax loss carryforwards. Valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets can be impacted by changes in tax law, changes in statutory tax rates and future levels of taxable income. In the event the Company was to determine that it would not be able to realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets in the future, the Company would reduce such amounts through a charge to income in the period that such determination was made. Conversely, if the Company was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net carrying amounts, the Company would decrease the recorded valuation allowance and record an increase to income in the period that such determination was made. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return, as well as returns required by various state and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities, including such major jurisdictions as the United States, France, Germany and the Netherlands. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal examinations for years before 2006, state and local examinations for years before 2002, and non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before 2003.

In assessing the need for reserves for uncertainties in income taxes recognized, a significant number of estimates and judgments must be made by the Company. The total amount of net unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the effective tax rate if recognized was $0.7 million as of December 31, 2012.

United States income taxes have not been provided on undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that might be payable. The Company’s intention is to reinvest these earnings permanently or to repatriate the earnings only when it is tax effective to do so.

The Company’s effective tax rates in future periods could be affected by earnings being lower or higher than anticipated in countries where tax rates differ from the United States federal rate, the relative impact of permanent tax adjustments on higher or lower earnings from domestic operations, changes in net deferred tax asset valuation allowances, changes in tax rates or tax laws and the completion of tax audits.

Equity Compensation Plans

The Company accounts for awards of equity instruments under the fair value method of accounting and recognizes such amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company recognizes expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the entire award. Stock-based compensation expense includes the estimated effects of forfeitures and such estimates of forfeitures are adjusted over the requisite service period to the extent actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. The effect of changes in estimated forfeitures is recognized in the period of change and will also impact the amount of expense to be recognized in future periods. The Company estimates the fair value of option grants based on the Black Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility and expected term are based on historical information. The Company believes that future volatility and expected term are not likely to materially differ from the Company’s historical stock price volatility and historical exercise data, respectively.

The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for the years ended December 31:

		2012				2011				2010
Risk-free interest rate			1.4%				2.6	%			2.2	%
Expected life			5.7 years				5.5 years				5.3 years
Expected volatility			68%				69	%			65	%
Expected dividend yield			0%				0	%			0	%

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standards update requiring new disclosures about reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net income. These disclosures may be presented on the face of the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

statements or in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The standards update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company will adopt this standards update and revise its disclosure, as required, beginning with the first quarter of 2013.

In July 2012, the FASB” issued ASU No. 2012-02, Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, which amends ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. This ASU gives an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine if indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired. The entity may first determine based on qualitative factors if it is more likely than not that the fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets are less than their carrying amount. If that assessment indicates no impairment, the quantitative impairment test is not required. This standard is effective for financial statements of periods beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which amends ASC 210, Balance Sheet. This ASU requires entities to disclose gross and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and those subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. This would include derivatives and other financial securities arrangements. The effective date is January 1, 2013 and must be applied retrospectively. The adoption of this ASU will have no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

OTHER KEY FINANCIAL ITEMS

Cash and Cash Equivalents — Cash and cash equivalents increased to $63.6 million as of December 31, 2012 compared with $30.9 million as of December 31, 2011. This increase of $32.7 million was primarily due to cash generated from operating activities of $34.4 million and, to a lesser extent, cash generated from investing activities of $1.6 million, which was partially offset by cash used for financing activities of $3.9 million. Investing activities included $12.0 million received upon redemption of short-term investment and $1.0 million received from services provided with the 2010 sale of a product line, partially offset by $11.4 million used for capital expenditures. Financing activities were primarily attributed to the repurchase of company stock of $4.0 million. The effect of exchange rate changes on cash was a favorable $0.6 million in 2012 compared to a unfavorable $0.8 million in 2011.

Short-term Investment — Short-term investments at December 31, 2011 were comprised of a certificate of deposit with a financial institution that was entered into with proceeds from the sale of Affinity in 2011. The certificate of deposit matured on January 23, 2012 and $12.0 million of proceeds were recorded to cash and cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable — Accounts receivable, net of the allowance for doubtful receivables, were $47.5 million at December 31, 2012 compared with $47.3 million at December 31, 2011. Net sales in the fourth quarter of 2012 were essentially flat with the fourth quarter of 2011.

Inventories — Inventories were $31.3 million as of December 31, 2012 compared with $33.8 million as of December 31, 2011. Primarily contributing to this decrease was lower raw material inventory due to the timing of raw material purchases and a concentrated effort to reduce raw material inventory levels.

Benefit Plan Liabilities — Benefit plan liabilities increased to $25.1 million at December 31, 2012 compared to $21.3 million at December 31, 2011. The increase of $3.8 million was primarily due to an increase in the underfunded status of the Company’s domestic defined benefit pension plan. Interest cost and actuarial loss from a change in discount rate aggregated $9.1 million, which was partially offset by returns on plan assets and Company contributions, which aggregated $5.7 million.

Capital Expenditures — Capital expenditures were $11.4 million in 2012, $8.9 million in 2011, and $12.0 million in 2010. Capital spending for 2013 is expected to be approximately $14.0 million to $15.0 million.

Total Debt To Total Capitalization — Total debt to total capitalization decreased to 1.4% in 2012 compared with 2.0% in 2011. The decrease was due to lower debt levels and higher equity in 2012 compared to 2011. At December 31, 2012, the Company has domestic and foreign credit facilities with availability of $44.4 million.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stockholders’ Equity — Stockholders’ equity increased to $174.5 million at December 31, 2012 compared to $160.9 million at December 31, 2011. This increase was primarily due to net income of $16.8 million and, to a lesser extent, proceeds from stock issuances and stock based compensation of $2.6 million and foreign currency translation adjustments of $1.2 million. Partially offsetting this increase were share repurchases of $4.0 million and pension liability adjustments of $3.0 million. On a per share basis, calculated as stockholders’ equity divided by shares outstanding at December 31, 2012, stockholders’ equity increased to $10.29 at December 31, 2012 from $9.38 at December 31, 2011.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements — Other than operating leases, the Company does not have any other material off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

Inflation — Inflation generally affects the Company through its costs of labor, equipment, energy and raw materials. The increased costs of these items have generally been offset by price increases, operating improvements, and other cost-saving initiatives. The Company also has certain arrangements in which it can pass through inflation on raw material costs to its customers.

Lydall’s limited market risk exposures relate to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK

Lydall has sales and manufacturing activities in foreign countries. As a result, financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or economic conditions in the foreign markets where the Company manufactures and distributes its products. The Company’s primary currency exposure is to the Euro and, to a lesser degree, the Japanese Yen and the British Pound Sterling.

Lydall’s foreign and domestic operations limit foreign currency exchange transaction risk by completing transactions in local functional currencies whenever practicable. In addition, Lydall periodically enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to mitigate exposure to foreign currency volatility. Lydall utilizes bank loans and other debt instruments throughout its operations. To mitigate foreign currency risk, such debt is denominated primarily in the functional currency of the operation maintaining the debt.

INTEREST RATE RISK

The Company’s interest rate exposure is most sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates in the United States and Europe, which impact interest paid on its debt. During 2012 and 2011, the Company had no loans or borrowings on lines of credit outstanding with variable interest rates, therefore, a 10% change in the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s variable rate debt would not have any impact to the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The weighted average interest rate paid on variable debt was 4.5% in 2010.

The weighted average interest rate on long-term debt was 5.4% for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared with 5.4% for 2011 and 5.3% for 2010.

The response to this Item is contained under Item 15. “Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.”

None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, including the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation as of December 31, 2012 of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Controls

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2012 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). With the participation of the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. Management utilized the criteria and framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework in performing this assessment. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by or under the supervision of, the CEO and CFO or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company's board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.

None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART III

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of the definitive Proxy Statement of Lydall to be filed with the Commission within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 26, 2013 (the “2013 Proxy Statement”). Information regarding the Executive Officers of the Company is contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company’s Code of Ethics and Business Conduct for all employees and its Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Senior Financial Officers and all Accounting and Financial Personnel can be obtained free of charge on the Company’s website under the Corporate Governance section or by contacting the Office of the General Counsel, P.O. Box 151, One Colonial Road, Manchester, CT 06045-0151.

The Company intends to post on its website all disclosures that are required by law or New York Stock Exchange listing standards concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, the provisions of these documents.

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “2012 Director Compensation,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation Tables,” “Corporate Governance — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation” of the 2013 Proxy Statement.

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Executive Compensation Tables — Equity Compensation Plan Information” and “Securities Ownership of Directors, Certain Officers and 5% Beneficial Owners” of the 2013 Proxy Statement.

The following table provides information about the Company’s Common Stock that may be issued upon exercise of options and rights under all of the Company’s existing equity compensation plans at December 31, 2012. The number of securities remaining available for issuance at December 31, 2012 was 1,542,446 and includes shares that may be issued as restricted stock, performance shares and other stock awards.

Plan Category		Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)				Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)				Number of securities remaining available for issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders			1,136,863			$	7.14				1,542,446
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders			—				—				—
Total			1,136,863			$	7.14				1,542,446

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Corporate Governance — Independence Determination,” “Related Party Transactions,” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” of the 2013 Proxy Statement.

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Proposal 3 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors,” and “Principal Fees and Services” of the 2013 Proxy Statement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

		Page
a) 1. Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-1
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010			F-2
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010			F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011			F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010			F-5
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012			F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			F-7
a) 2. Financial Statement Schedule:
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010			S-1

Other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions, are inapplicable or are presented in “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” and therefore have been omitted.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

a) 3. Exhibits Included Herein or Incorporated by Reference:

3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended through the date of filing of this report, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 12, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.
3.2		Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended and restated as of December 11, 2003, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 12, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.
4.1		Certain long-term debt instruments, each representing indebtedness in an amount equal to less than 10 percent of the Registrant’s total consolidated assets, have not been filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Registrant will file these instruments with the Commission upon request.
10.1		Capital lease agreement between Lydall Thermique Acoustique S.A.S., CMCIC Lease and Natiocredimurs Societe en Nom Collectif, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated November 9, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.2*		Employment Agreement with Dale Barnhart dated July 31, 2007, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated August 3, 2007 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.3*		Employment Agreement with Erika H. Steiner (formerly Turner) dated November 2, 2009, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated November 4, 2009 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.4*		Employment Agreement with Mona G. Estey dated January 10, 2007, filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 13, 2007 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.5*		Employment Agreement with Robert K. Julian dated October 3, 2012, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated October 4, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.6*		Employment Agreement with David H. Williams dated June 27, 2012, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 1, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.7*		Indemnification Agreement with Dale Barnhart dated July 31, 2007, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated August 3, 2007 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.8*		Lydall, Inc. Annual Incentive Performance Bonus Program, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated March 15, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.9		Form of Indemnification Agreement between Lydall, Inc. and non-employee directors, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 19, 2009 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.10*		Amended and Restated Lydall 2003 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated May 2, 2011 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.11*		Lydall 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit A to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement dated March 16, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.12*		Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement to Non-Employee Directors (Under the Lydall 2012 Stock Incentive Plan), filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 1, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.13*		Form of Non-Qualified/Incentive Stock Option Agreement (Under the Lydall 2012 Stock Incentive Plan) for U.S. employees, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 1, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.14*		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Under the Lydall 2012 Stock Incentive Plan) for U.S. Employees, filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 1, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.15*		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Under the Lydall 2012 Stock Incentive Plan) for Netherland employees, filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 1, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.16*		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Under the Lydall 2012 Stock Incentive Plan) for French employees, filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 1, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.17*		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Under the Lydall 2012 Stock Incentive Plan) for German employees, filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 1, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.18*		Form of Lydall, Inc. Performance Share Award Agreement (Three-Year Period) for U.S. employees, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 1, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.19*		Form of Lydall, Inc. Performance Share Award Agreement (Three-Year Period) for French employees, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 1, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.20*		Form of Lydall, Inc. Performance Share Award Agreement (Three-Year Period) for German employees, filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q dated August 1, 2012 and incorporated herein by this reference.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.21*		Form of Lydall, Inc. Performance Share Award Agreement (One-Year Period), filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2010 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.22		Credit Agreement, dated June 16, 2011, by and between Lydall, Inc., as borrower, and Bank of America, N.A., as lender, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 21, 2011 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.23		Guaranty Agreement, dated June 16, 2011, by and among Lydall Thermal/Acoustical, Inc., Lydall Filtration/Separation, Inc., Lydall International, Inc., and Bank of America, N.A., filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 21, 2011 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.24		Security Agreement, dated June 16, 2011 by and between Lydall, Inc., and Bank of America, N.A., filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 21, 2011 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.25		Security Agreement, dated June 16, 2011 by and between Lydall Thermal/Acoustical, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 21, 2011 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.26		Security Agreement, dated June 16, 2011 by and between Lydall Filtration/Separation, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 21, 2011 and incorporated herein by this reference.
10.27		Security Agreement, dated June 16, 2011 by and between Lydall International, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 21, 2011 and incorporated herein by this reference.
14.1		Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Senior Financial Officers and All Accounting and Financial Personnel, filed as Exhibit 14.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 12, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference. This document can also be accessed on Lydall’s website at www.lydall.com under the Corporate Governance section.
21.1		List of subsidiaries of the Registrant, filed herewith.
23.1		Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed herewith.
24.1		Power of Attorney, dated February 19, 2013, authorizing Robert K. Julian to sign this report on behalf of each member of the Board of Directors indicated therein, filed herewith.
31.1		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed herewith.
31.2		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed herewith.
32.1		Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished herewith.
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Lydall, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		Lydall, Inc.
February 26, 2013		By:                   /s/ Robert K. Julian                            Robert K. Julian Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Lydall, Inc. in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature		Title		Date
/s/ Dale G. Barnhart Dale G. Barnhart		President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)		February 26, 2013
/s/ Robert K. Julian Robert K. Julian		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)		February 26, 2013
/s/ James V. Laughlan James V. Laughlan		Chief Accounting Officer, Controller and Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer)		February 26, 2013
/s/ Robert K. Julian Robert K. Julian Attorney-in-fact for:				February 26, 2013
Kathleen Burdett		Director
W. Leslie Duffy		Chairman of the Board of Directors
Matthew T. Farrell		Director
Marc T. Giles		Director
William D. Gurley		Director
Suzanne Hammett		Director
S. Carl Soderstrom, Jr.		Director

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Lydall, Inc.:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lydall, Inc and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
February 26, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lydall, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

		For the years ended December 31,
In thousands except per share data		2012				2011				2010
Net sales		$	378,924			$	383,588			$	316,113
Cost of sales			301,117				316,082				262,250
Gross profit			77,807				67,506				53,863
Selling, product development and administrative expenses			57,239				52,937				52,890
Gain on sale of product line			(810	)			(1,619	)			(2,542	)
Operating income from continuing operations			21,378				16,188				3,515
Interest expense			365				880				854
Other expense (income), net			31				(94	)			(110	)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes			20,982				15,402				2,771
Income tax expense from continuing operations			4,176				6,355				872
Income from continuing operations			16,806				9,047				1,899
Income from discontinued operations, net			—				4,732				740
Net income		$	16,806			$	13,779			$	2,639
Basic earnings per common share:
Continuing operations		$	1.01			$	0.54			$	0.11
Discontinued operations		$	—			$	0.28			$	0.04
Net income		$	1.01			$	0.82			$	0.16
Weighted average common shares outstanding			16,717				16,753				16,672
Diluted earnings per common share:
Continuing operations		$	0.99			$	0.54			$	0.11
Discontinued operations		$	—			$	0.28			$	0.04
Net income		$	0.99			$	0.82			$	0.16
Weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding			16,973				16,896				16,788

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lydall, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

		For the years ended December 31,
In thousands		2012				2011				2010
Net income		$	16,806			$	13,779			$	2,639
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in pension plans, net of income taxes of $1,832, $3,712 and $199			(2,989	)			(6,056	)			325
Change in fair value of derivative instrument, net of income taxes of $13			—				—				(21	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments			1,241				(2,232	)			(5,279	)
Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax			(1,748	)			(8,288	)			(4,975	)
Comprehensive income (loss)		$	15,058			$	5,491			$	(2,336	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lydall, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

		December 31,
In thousands of dollars and shares		2012				2011
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	63,623			$	30,905
Short-term investment			—				12,015
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful receivables of $469 and $622, respectively)			47,486				47,258
Inventories			31,292				33,846
Taxes receivable			965				598
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			8,435				6,198
Total current assets			151,801				130,820
Property, plant and equipment, net			76,254				78,939
Goodwill			18,282				18,059
Other intangible assets, net			3,825				4,537
Deferred tax assets			474				798
Other assets, net			1,280				2,032
Total assets		$	251,916			$	235,185
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt		$	765			$	1,035
Accounts payable			29,441				28,163
Accrued payroll and other compensation			10,273				9,031
Accrued taxes			1,728				2,532
Other accrued liabilities			4,143				4,038
Total current liabilities			46,350				44,799
Long-term debt			1,646				2,261
Deferred tax liabilities			3,902				5,240
Benefit plan liabilities			25,080				21,269
Other long-term liabilities			442				764
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 12)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock (par value $1.00 per share; authorized 500,000 shares; none issued or outstanding)			—				—
Common stock (par value $0.10 per share; authorized 30,000 shares; issued 23,785 and 23,645 shares, respectively)			2,379				2,365
Capital in excess of par value			58,784				56,214
Retained earnings			201,097				184,291
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(18,366	)			(16,618	)
Treasury stock, 6,821 and 6,498 shares of common stock, respectively, at cost			(69,398	)			(65,400	)
Total stockholders’ equity			174,496				160,852
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	251,916			$	235,185

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lydall, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

		For the years ended December 31,
In thousands		2012				2011				2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income		$	16,806			$	13,779			$	2,639
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax			—				(3,857	)			—
Gain on sale of product line			(810	)			(1,619	)			(2,542	)
Depreciation and amortization			13,572				14,478				14,407
Amortization of debt issuance costs			110				525				403
Deferred income taxes			(1,649	)			1,182				334
Stock based compensation			1,401				1,288				1,354
Impairment and loss on disposition of property, plant and equipment			1,977				198				175
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			(150	)			(4,088	)			(9,148	)
Taxes receivable			(355	)			112				2,517
Inventories			2,728				(348	)			(11,820	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets			620				(843	)			552
Accounts payable			1,118				(3,892	)			8,508
Accrued taxes			(693	)			(667	)			2,441
Accrued payroll and other compensation			1,152				573				3,472
Other liabilities, net			(1,422	)			(2,164	)			(2,574	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			34,405				14,657				10,718
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net proceeds from divestiture			—				13,982				—
Acquisitions, net			—				—				276
Proceeds from sale of a product line			1,000				—				4,797
Capital expenditures			(11,404	)			(8,884	)			(12,001	)
Reimbursement of cash from leasing company			—				818				699
Increase in restricted cash			—				(225	)			—
Redemption (purchase) of short-term investment			12,015				(12,000	)			—
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities			1,611				(6,309	)			(6,229	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Debt proceeds			—				—				4,900
Debt payments			(285	)			(255	)			(5,129	)
Capital lease payments			(771	)			(1,294	)			(1,177	)
Common stock repurchased			(3,998	)			(200	)			(111	)
Excess tax benefit on stock awards			211				—				—
Common stock issued			972				128				113
Net cash used for financing activities			(3,871	)			(1,621	)			(1,404	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash			573				(810	)			(818	)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents			32,718				5,917				2,267
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			30,905				24,988				22,721
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	63,623			$	30,905			$	24,988
Supplemental Schedule for Cash Flow Information
Cash paid (received) during the year for:
Interest		$	255			$	351			$	441
Income taxes		$	5,347			$	6,308			$	(3,012	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lydall, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

		Common Stock Shares				Common Stock Amount				Capital in Excess of Par Value				Retained Earnings				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Treasury Stock				Total Stockholders' Equity
Balance at December 31, 2009			23,560			$	2,356			$	53,394			$	167,873			$	(3,355	)		$	(65,089	)		$	155,179
Net income															2,639												2,639
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax																			(4,975	)							(4,975	)
Stock repurchased																							(111	)			(111	)
Stock issued under employee plans			48				5				54																59
Stock based compensation expense											1,102																1,102
Stock issued to directors			31				3				249																252
Balance at December 31, 2010			23,639				2,364				54,799				170,512				(8,330	)			(65,200	)			154,145
Net income															13,779												13,779
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax																			(8,288	)							(8,288	)
Stock repurchased																							(200	)			(200	)
Stock issued (cancelled) under employee plans			(18	)			(1	)			129																128
Stock based compensation expense											1,036																1,036
Stock issued to directors			24				2				250																252
Balance at December 31, 2011			23,645				2,365				56,214				184,291				(16,618	)			(65,400	)			160,852
Net Income															16,806												16,806
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax																			(1,748	)							(1,748	)
Stock repurchased																							(3,998	)			(3,998	)
Stock issued under employee plans			122				12				960																972
Excess tax benefit on stock awards											211																211
Stock based compensation expense											1,149																1,149
Stock issued to directors			18				2				250																252
Balance at December 31, 2012			23,785			$	2,379			$	58,784			$	201,097			$	(18,366	)		$	(69,398	)		$	174,496

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lydall, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Significant Accounting Policies

Business — Lydall, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Lydall”) design and manufacture specialty engineered filtration media, industrial thermal insulating solutions, automotive thermal and acoustical barriers, medical filtration media and devices and biopharmaceutical processing components for thermal/acoustical, filtration/separation and bio/medical applications.

Principles of consolidation — The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Lydall, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Estimates and assumptions — The preparation of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the financial statement dates and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Risks and uncertainties  — Worldwide economic cycles affect the markets that the Company’s businesses serve and affect demand for Lydall’s products and impact profitability. Among other factors, disruptions in the global credit and financial markets, including diminished liquidity and credit availability, swings in consumer confidence and spending, unstable economic growth and fluctuations in unemployment rates has caused economic instability that has, and could continue to have, a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Cash and cash equivalents — Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase.

Short-term investments — Short-term investments included a certificate of deposit with a banking institution that had an original maturity of six months. The short-term investment was classified as held to maturity and carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at amortized cost as of December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2011, the estimated fair value of the investment approximated its amortized cost, and, therefore, there were no significant unrecognized holding gains or losses. This certificate of deposit matured on January 23, 2012 and $12.0 million of proceeds were recorded to cash and cash equivalents.

Concentrations of credit risk — Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and trade accounts receivable. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments in high-quality financial institutions and instruments with a minimum investment grade rating of BBB or better. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited by the large number of customers comprising the Company’s customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographies. Foreign and export sales were 46.7% of the Company’s net sales in 2012, 49.9% in 2011, and 50.7% in 2010. Export sales primarily to Europe, Asia, Mexico and Canada were $49.7 million, $47.0 million, and $40.7 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral. Sales to the automotive market, included in the Thermal/Acoustical Metals and Thermal/Acoustical Fibers segments, were 65.5% of the Company’s net sales in 2012, 62.0% in 2011, and 57.0% in 2010. Sales to Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) were 18.8%, 16.2%, and 11.1% of Lydall’s 2012, 2011, and 2010 net sales, respectively. Sales to Chrysler Group LLC accounted for 10.0% of Lydall’s net sales in the year ended December 31, 2012. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of total net sales in 2012, 2011 or 2010. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, Ford represented 17.0% and 14.5%, respectively, of total accounts receivable. No other customers accounted for more than 10.0% of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2012 or 2011.

Inventories — Inventories are valued at lower of cost or market, cost being determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost method. Inventories in excess of requirements for current or anticipated orders have been written down to net realizable value.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pre-production design and development costs — The Company enters into contractual agreements with certain customers to design and develop molds, dies and tools (collectively, “tooling”). All such tooling contracts relate to parts that the Company will supply to customers under long-term supply agreements. Tooling costs are accumulated in work-in process inventory and are charged to operations as the related revenue from the tooling is recognized. Revenue is recognized as tooling is delivered and accepted by the customer. The Company also may progress bill on certain tooling being constructed. These billings are recorded as progress billings (a reduction of the associated work-in-process inventory) until the appropriate revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Periodically, the Company enters into contractually guaranteed reimbursement arrangements as a mechanism to collect amounts due from customers from tooling sales. Under these arrangements, amounts due from tooling sales are collected as parts are delivered over the part supply arrangement, in accordance with the specific terms of the arrangement. The amounts due from the customer in such transactions are recorded in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net” or “Other assets, net” based upon the expected term of the reimbursement arrangement.

The following tooling related assets were included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

		December 31,
In thousands		2012				2011
Inventories, net of progress billings and reserves		$	3,482			$	3,654
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net			399				463
Other assets, net			—				334
Total tooling related assets		$	3,881			$	4,451

Amounts included in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net” include the short-term portion of receivables due under contractually guaranteed reimbursement arrangements and amounts included in “Other assets, net” represent the long-term portion of those receivables. Included in the inventory balance was an offset for progress billings of $4.6 million and $2.7 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Company owned tooling is recorded in “Property, plant and equipment, net” and was not material at December 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

Property, plant and equipment — Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost. Assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease. Property, plant and equipment, including property, plant and equipment under capital leases, are depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the life of the asset, whichever is shorter. The cost and accumulated depreciation amounts applicable to assets sold or otherwise disposed of are removed from the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts and any net gain or loss is included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Expenses for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

Goodwill and other intangible assets — Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying net assets of acquired companies. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but are subject to annual impairment tests. All other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from 4 to 20 years. In performing impairment tests, the Company considers discounted cash flows and other market factors as best evidence of fair value. There are inherent uncertainties and management judgment required in these analyses.

Valuation of long-lived assets — The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets, or asset groups, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Should such evaluations indicate that the related future undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying values of the assets, such carrying values would be reduced to fair value and this adjusted carrying value would become the assets’ new cost basis. Fair value is determined primarily using future anticipated cash flows that are directly associated with, and that are expected to arise as a direct result of the use and eventual disposition of the asset, or asset group, as well as market conditions and other factors. There are inherent uncertainties and management judgment required in these analyses.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Employer sponsored benefit plans — The Company recognizes the funded status of its domestic defined benefit pension plan. Net benefit obligations are calculated based on actuarial valuations using key assumptions related to discount rates and expected return on plan assets.

Derivative instruments — Derivative instruments are measured at fair value and recognized as either assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet in either current or non-current other assets or other accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities depending upon maturity and commitment. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods in which the hedge transaction affects earnings. In general, the types of risks being hedged by the Company are related to the variability of future cash flows caused by changes in foreign currency exchange rates and hedging the impact of variability of foreign exchange rates on recorded intercompany assets or liabilities. Lydall’s objective for entering into derivative instruments has always been for risk management purposes. The Company does not engage in derivative instruments for speculative purposes. Lydall has historically not been a party to a significant number of derivative instruments.

Revenue recognition — The Company recognizes revenue (1) once evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) product delivery has occurred; (3) pricing is fixed or determinable; and (4) collection is reasonably assured. The four criteria required to recognize revenue are considered to be met, and the passage of title to the customer occurs, at the respective FOB point and, therefore, revenue is recognized at that time. The Company’s standard sales and shipping terms are FOB shipping point, therefore, substantially all revenue is recognized upon shipment. However, in limited circumstances, the Company conducts business with certain customers on FOB destination terms and in these instances revenue is recognized upon receipt by the customer. The Company generally does not provide specific customer inspection or acceptance provisions in its sales terms, with the exception of tooling sales discussed in “Pre-production design and development costs” above.

Sales returns and allowances are recorded as identified or communicated by the customer and internally approved. The Company does not provide customers with general rights of return for products sold; however, in limited circumstances, the Company will allow sales returns and allowances from customers if the products sold do not conform to specifications.

Shipping and handling costs consist primarily of costs incurred to deliver products to customers and internal costs related to preparing products for shipment and are recorded in cost of sales. Amounts billed to customers as shipping and handling are classified as revenue.

Research and development — Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred and amounted to $7.7 million in 2012, $8.1 million in 2011 and $8.5 million in 2010. Research and development costs were primarily comprised of development personnel salaries, prototype material costs and testing and trials of new products.

Earnings per share — Basic earnings per common share are equal to net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share are equal to net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including the effect of stock options and stock awards, if such effect is dilutive.

Income taxes — The provision for income taxes is based upon income reported in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between the amounts of income and expense recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax purposes. In the event the Company was to determine that it would not be able to realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets in the future, the Company would record a valuation allowance through a charge to income in the period that such determination was made. Conversely, if the Company was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net carrying amounts, the Company would decrease the recorded valuation allowance and record an increase to income in the period that such determination was made.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Translation of foreign currencies — Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated at exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Any resulting translation gains or losses are reported in other comprehensive income (loss).

Stock options and share grants — The Company accounts for awards of equity instruments under the fair value method of accounting and recognizes such amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company recognizes expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the entire award. Stock-based compensation expense includes the estimated effects of forfeitures, and such estimates of forfeitures are adjusted over the requisite service period to the extent actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. The effect of changes in estimated forfeitures is recognized in the period of change and also impacts the amount of expense to be recognized in future periods. The Company estimates the fair value of option grants based on the Black Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility and expected term are based on historical information. The Company believes that its future volatility and expected term are not likely to materially differ from the Company’s historical stock price volatility and historical exercise data, respectively. Compensation expense for all restricted stock awards is recorded based on the market value of the stock on the grant date and recognized as expense over the vesting period of the award. Compensation expense for performance-based restricted stock is also impacted by the probability of achieving the performance targets.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. As required by the new standard, the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income is included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted FASBs ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs, which amends ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. This ASU requires the categorization by level for items that are required to be disclosed at fair value, information about transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 and additional disclosure for Level 3 measurements. In addition, the ASU provides guidance on measuring the fair value of financial instruments managed within a portfolio and the application of premiums and discounts on fair value measurements. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

2. Inventories

Inventories as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

		December 31,
In thousands		2012				2011
Raw materials		$	12,501			$	15,068
Work in process			12,800				11,569
Finished goods			10,549				9,915
			35,850				36,552
Less: Progress billings on tooling inventory			(4,558	)			(2,706	)
Total inventories		$	31,292			$	33,846

Included in work in process is gross tooling inventory of $8.0 million and $6.4 million at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Tooling inventory, net of progress billings, was $3.5 million and $3.7 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

		Estimated Useful Lives				December 31,
In thousands						2012				2011
Land			—			$	2,164			$	2,143
Buildings and improvements			10 – 35 years				46,033				43,510
Machinery and equipment			5 – 25 years				156,551				146,505
Office equipment			2 – 8 years				32,939				32,682
Vehicles			3 – 6 years				565				581
Assets under capital leases:
Land			—				664				652
Buildings and improvements			10 – 35 years				5,827				5,717
Machinery and equipment			5 – 25 years				—				3,882
							244,743				235,672
Accumulated depreciation							(170,306	)			(156,739	)
Accumulated amortization of capital leases							(2,646	)			(4,479	)
							71,791				74,454
Construction in progress							4,463				4,485
Total property, plant and equipment						$	76,254			$	78,939

Depreciation expense was $12.8 million in 2012, $13.6 million in 2011 and $13.7 million in 2010.

On February 7, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a change in the Company’s IT software and systems strategy from a previous project, involving an ERP reimplementation, to a project involving an ERP upgrade and some additional applications software. As a result of this change in IT strategy, the Company recorded a $1.8 million asset impairment charge in the quarter ended December 31, 2012. The original project costs were deemed to have no future fair value, and the Board of Director’s decision was in response to conditions that existed at December 31, 2012.

4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Gross and net carrying amounts of goodwill at December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

In thousands		Performance Materials				Thermal/ Acoustical Metals				Other Products and Services				Totals
Goodwill		$	13,399			$	12,160			$	5,787			$	31,346
Accumulated amortization/impairment			—				(12,160	)			(1,127	)			(13,287	)
Balance at December 31, 2011			13,399				—				4,660				18,059
Goodwill			13,622				12,160				5,787				31,569
Accumulated amortization/impairment			—				(12,160	)			(1,127	)			(13,287	)
Balance at December 31, 2012		$	13,622			$	—			$	4,660			$	18,282

The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill in 2011 and 2012 are as follows:

In thousands		Performance Materials				Other Products and Services				Totals
Balance at January 1, 2011		$	13,522			$	4,660			$	18,182
Goodwill adjustment			15				—				15
Currency translation adjustment			(138	)			—				(138	)
Balance at December 31, 2011			13,399				4,660				18,059
Goodwill adjustment			117				—				117
Currency translation adjustment			106				—				106
Balance at December 31, 2012		$	13,622			$	4,660			$	18,282

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Goodwill Impairment Testing

During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company performed its annual impairment analysis of the $13.6 million of goodwill in the Performance Materials reporting unit (PM reporting unit) and $4.7 million of goodwill in the Life Sciences Vital Fluids reporting unit (VF reporting unit), included in OPS.

After considering changes to assumptions used in the Company’s most recent quantitative annual testing, including the capital markets environment, economic conditions, industry trends, changes in results of operations, the magnitude of the excess of fair value over the carrying amount of the PM reporting unit, and other factors, the Company concluded it was not necessary to perform the two-step impairment test for the PM reporting unit as it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the PM reporting unit was less than its carrying value. As a result, the Company concluded that the PM reporting unit goodwill was not impaired.

The Company performed a quantitative two step approach to test the VF reporting unit for impairment due to the results of the 2011 impairment analysis and historical financial results. During 2012, the VF reporting unit met the discounted cash flow projections included in the 2011 income approach calculation, primarily as a result of sales growth. For 2012, the Company used both the income approach and market approach in performing step one of the impairment analysis to estimate the fair value of the VF reporting unit. The Company determined that the VF reporting unit, with $4.7 million of goodwill, had excess fair value over its carrying value, and as a result, step two of the impairment test was not required.

In performing step one of the impairment analysis to estimate the fair value of the VF reporting unit for 2012, the Company used both: (i) the income approach — discounted cash flows, and (ii) the market approach — comparable company analysis. The income approach involved determining the present value of future cash flows from the reporting unit’s projected financial results in 2013 – 2015 and the projected cash flows beyond that three year period computed as the terminal value. The Company believes the income approach was appropriate because it provided a fair value estimate based upon the reporting unit’s expected long-term operations and cash flow performance.

In applying the market approach, valuation multiples were derived from historic and projected operating data of selected guideline companies, which were evaluated and adjusted, if necessary, based on the strengths and weaknesses of the reporting unit relative to the selected guideline companies. The valuation multiples were then applied to the appropriate projected operating data of the reporting unit to arrive at an indication of fair value. The Company believes the market approach was appropriate because it provided a fair value using multiples from companies with operations and economic characteristics similar to its reporting unit.

The estimates of fair value of reporting units are based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment, which incorporate management assumptions about expected future cash flows, as well as other factors such as market capitalization and other market information. Future cash flows can be affected by numerous factors including changes in economic, industry or market conditions, changes in the underlying business or products of the reporting unit, changes in competition and changes in technology. Any changes in key assumptions about the business and its prospects, changes in any of the factors discussed above or other factors could affect the fair value of one or more of the reporting units resulting in an impairment charge. If future operating performance in the VF reporting unit does not reasonably meet expectations or other key assumptions change or are not met, then a non-cash impairment charge to income from operations could occur.

Goodwill Associated with Acquisitions and Divestitures

The goodwill adjustment of $0.1 million in 2012 was related to the acquisition of DSM Solutech B.V. (“Solutech”) in December 2008. Lydall is obligated to pay to the Seller payments based on the net revenues of Solutech for a period of five years beginning on December 1, 2008 (“Contingent Consideration”). This Contingent Consideration will equal 4% of Solutech’s net revenues, as defined, during each of the periods. The value of the Contingent Consideration when paid will be added to the original cost of the acquisition and will increase the amount of goodwill previously recorded, as the acquisition occurred prior to the revised guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (ASC 805) for business combinations.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other Intangible Assets

The table below presents the gross carrying amount and, as applicable, the accumulated amortization of the Company’s acquired intangible assets other than goodwill included in “Other intangible assets, net” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

		December 31, 2012								December 31, 2011
In thousands		Gross Carrying Amount				Accumulated Amortization				Gross Carrying Amount				Accumulated Amortization
Amortized intangible assets
License agreements		$	860			$	(854	)		$	851			$	(721	)
Patents			6,522				(2,781	)			6,482				(2,182	)
Other			272				(194	)			269				(162	)
Total amortized intangible assets		$	7,654			$	(3,829	)		$	7,602			$	(3,065	)