Edgar Filing: CREE INC

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 29, 2009

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-21154

CREE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


North Carolina (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		56-1572719 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4600 Silicon Drive Durham, North Carolina (Address of principal executive offices)		27703 (Zip Code)

(919) 313-5300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)

Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer x	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company ¨
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.00125 per share, as of April 15, 2009, was 88,938,171.

CREE, INC.

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 29, 2009

INDEX


		Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 29, 2009 (unaudited) and June 29, 2008	3

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended March 29, 2009 (unaudited) and March 30, 2008 (unaudited)	4

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended March 29, 2009 (unaudited) and March 30, 2008 (unaudited)	5

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	36

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	36

Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	36

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	37

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	37

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	48

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	48

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	48

Item 5.	Other Information	48

Item 6.	Exhibits	48

SIGNATURE		49

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

CREE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	March 29, 2009 (Unaudited)		June 29, 2008
	(Thousands, except per share data)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	244,667	$	261,633
Short-term investments		122,051		50,795

Total cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments		366,718		312,428
Accounts receivable, net		102,937		110,376
Income tax receivable		1,007		9,825
Inventories, net		77,468		80,161
Deferred income taxes		5,006		4,578
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		11,643		13,000
Assets of discontinued operations		1,580		2,600

Total current assets		566,359		532,968
Property and equipment, net		327,736		348,013
Long-term investments		38,159		58,604
Intangible assets, net		116,150		125,037
Goodwill		248,529		244,003
Other assets		7,260		4,782

Total assets	$	1,304,193	$	1,313,407

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable, trade	$	35,201	$	37,402
Accrued salaries and wages		17,359		13,471
Income taxes payable		3,086		5,314
Deferred income taxes		1,482		—
Other current liabilities		6,132		7,938
Contingent payment due related to COTCO acquisition		—		60,000
Liabilities of discontinued operations		427		550

Total current liabilities		63,687		124,675
Long-term liabilities:
Deferred income taxes		44,418		38,048
Other long-term liabilities		4,326		4,199
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations		724		745

Total long-term liabilities		49,468		42,992
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.01; 3,000 shares authorized at March 29, 2009 and June 29, 2008; none issued and outstanding		—		—
Common stock, par value $0.00125; 200,000 shares authorized at March 29, 2009 and June 29, 2008; 88,749 and 88,088 shares issued and outstanding at March 29, 2009 and June 29, 2008, respectively		111		110
Additional paid-in-capital		833,388		811,015
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes		11,217		8,923
Retained earnings		346,322		325,692

Total shareholders’ equity		1,191,038		1,145,740

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,304,193	$	1,313,407

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements

CREE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008
	(Thousands, except per share data)						(Thousands, except per share data)
Revenue:
Product revenue, net	$	126,877		$	118,160		$	399,165		$	335,464
Contract revenue, net		4,267			6,826			14,398			21,907
Upfront licensing fee revenue		—			—			5,582			—

Total revenue		131,144			124,986			419,145			357,371
Cost of revenue:
Product revenue, net		80,201			75,935			253,676			219,766
Contract revenue, net		3,592			5,502			11,753			17,520
Upfront licensing fee revenue		—			—			506			—

Total cost of revenue		83,793			81,437			265,935			237,286
Gross profit		47,351			43,549			153,210			120,085
Operating expenses:
Research and development		17,071			15,405			52,787			43,083
Sales, general and administrative		21,043			21,076			65,804			57,449
Amortization of acquistion related intangibles		4,062			4,225			12,186			12,321
Loss (gain) on disposal or impairment of long-lived assets		2,255			(722	)		3,305			487

Total operating expenses		44,431			39,984			134,082			113,340
Operating income		2,920			3,565			19,128			6,745
Non-operating income:
Gain on sale of investments, net		13			—			78			14,117
Other non-operating income		28			129			181			207
Interest income, net		1,837			3,755			7,168			11,986

Income from continuing operations before income taxes		4,798			7,449			26,555			33,055
Income tax expense		768			1,787			5,740			7,885

Income from continuing operations		4,030			5,662			20,815			25,170
Loss from discontinued operations, net of related income taxes		(15	)		(2	)		(185	)		(176	)

Net income	$	4,015		$	5,660		$	20,630		$	24,994

Earnings per share:
Basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.05		$	0.06		$	0.24		$	0.29

Loss from discontinued operations	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)

Net income	$	0.05		$	0.06		$	0.23		$	0.29

Diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.05		$	0.06		$	0.23		$	0.29

Loss from discontinued operations	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)

Net income	$	0.05		$	0.06		$	0.23		$	0.29

Shares used in per share calculation:
Basic		88,243			87,211			88,050			85,695

Diluted		88,839			88,905			88,672			87,506

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements

CREE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)


	Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008
	(Thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	20,630		$	24,994
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		72,505			74,681
Stock-based compensation		15,792			11,314
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements		(141	)		(6,364	)
Loss on disposal or impairment of long-lived assets		3,305			487
Provision for doubtful accounts		806			439
Deferred income taxes		24			—
Gain on sale of investment in securities		(78	)		(14,117	)
Amortization of premium/discount on investments		1,240			(411	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		6,318			(31,081	)
Inventories		2,295			(14,252	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		16,139			3,437
Accounts payable, trade		(2,261	)		9,857
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(1,961	)		7,140

Net cash provided by operating activities		134,613			66,124

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(40,594	)		(37,542	)
Purchases of patent and licensing rights		(6,281	)		(5,471	)
Purchase of LED Lighting Fixtures, Inc., net of cash acquired		—			(7,180	)
Payment of contingent consideration related to LLF acquisition		(4,386	)
Payment of contingent consideration related to COTCO acquisition		(60,000	)		—
Purchases of investments		(215,404	)		(115,022	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments		166,273			230,309
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		37			1,046

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(160,355	)		66,140

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		10,133			56,061
Excess tax benefit from share-based payment arrangements		141			6,364
Repurchases of common stock		(2,744	)		(168	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		7,530			62,257

Effects of foreign exchange changes on cash and cash equivalents		1,246			5,039

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(16,966	)		199,560
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of period	$	261,633		$	93,881

End of period	$	244,667		$	293,441

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements

CREE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

Cree, Inc. (collectively with its subsidiaries, the “Company”), a North Carolina corporation established in 1987, develops and manufactures semiconductor materials and devices primarily based on silicon carbide (“SiC”), gallium nitride (“GaN”) and related compounds. The physical and electronic properties of SiC and GaN offer technical advantages over traditional silicon, gallium arsenide (“GaAs”), sapphire and other materials used for certain electronic applications. The Company currently focuses on light emitting diode (“LED”) products, which consist of LED chips, LED components and LED lighting products. The Company also develops power and radio frequency (“RF”) products, including power switching and RF devices. The Company has products commercially available in each of these categories.

The Company derives the majority of its revenue from sales of its LED products. The Company also generates revenue from sales of SiC and GaN materials, and the Company earns revenue under government contracts that support some of its research and development programs.

Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated balance sheet at March 29, 2009 and the consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008, and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008 have been prepared by the Company and have not been audited. In the opinion of management, all normal and recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows at March 29, 2009, and for all periods presented, have been made. The consolidated balance sheet at June 29, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2008 (“fiscal 2008”). The results of operations for the periods ended March 29, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be attained for the entire fiscal year ending June 28, 2009 (“fiscal 2009”).

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cree, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Fiscal Year

The Company’s fiscal year is a 52 or 53-week period ending on the last Sunday in the month of June. The Company’s 2009 fiscal year extends from June 30, 2008 to June 28, 2009 and will be a 52-week fiscal year. The Company’s 2008 fiscal year extended from June 25, 2007 to June 29, 2008 and was a 53-week fiscal year.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported consolidated net income or shareholders’ equity.

Uses of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, provision for doubtful accounts and sales returns, provision for inventory obsolescence, fair value of investments, fair value of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, income taxes, product warranty obligations, employee stock options, and contingencies and litigation, among others. The Company generally bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates.

Segment Information

Segmentation is based on an entity’s internal organization and reporting of revenue and operating income based upon internal accounting methods commonly referred to as the “management approach.” Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer. The Company has determined that it currently operates as one reportable segment.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of unrestricted cash accounts and highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company holds cash and cash equivalents at several major financial institutions, which often exceed insurance limits set by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Company has not historically experienced any losses due to such concentration of credit risk.

Investments

Investments are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” This statement requires certain securities to be classified into three categories:

•

Held-to-Maturity—Debt securities that the entity has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are reported at amortized cost.

•

Trading Securities—Debt and equity securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling in the near term are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.

•

Available-for-Sale—Debt and equity securities not classified as either securities held-to-maturity or trading securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains or losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

The Company reassesses the appropriateness of the classification (i.e., held-to-maturity, trading securities, or available-for-sale) of its investments at the end of each reporting period. During fiscal 2008, the Company determined that its marketable securities previously classified as held-to-maturity should be reclassified to available-for-sale. This was based upon management’s determination that it no longer had the positive intent to hold the securities to maturity, as the underlying cash invested in these securities would be made available for operations.

When the fair value of an investment declines below its original cost, the Company considers all available evidence to evaluate whether the decline is other-than-temporary. Among other things, the Company considers the duration and extent of the decline and economic factors influencing the markets. The Company utilizes specific identification in computing realized gains and losses on the sale of investments. Realized gains and losses on the Company’s investments are reported in other income and expense. Investments in marketable securities with maturities beyond one year may be classified as short term based on their highly liquid nature and because such marketable securities represent the investment of cash that is available for current operations.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market value, with cost being determined on the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method or the average cost method.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the assets’ estimated useful lives. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the asset life or the life of the related lease. In general, the useful lives are as follows:


Manufacturing equipment		5 to 15 years
Buildings and building improvements		5 to 40 years
Furniture and office equipment		3 to 5 years
Leasehold improvements		Shorter of estimated useful life or lease term

Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. The costs for major renewals and improvements are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of the assets are removed from the accounts upon disposition and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.

Shipping and Handling Costs

Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of revenues and are recognized as a period expense during the period in which they are incurred.

Patent and License Rights

Patent rights reflect costs incurred by the Company in applying for and maintaining patents owned by the Company and in purchasing patents and related rights from third parties. License rights reflect costs incurred by the Company in acquiring licenses under patents owned by others. The Company amortizes both patent and license rights on a straight-line basis over the expected useful life of the associated rights, which is generally the lesser of 20 years from the date of the patent application or the license period. Royalties payable under licenses for patents owned by others are expensed as incurred.

Intangible Assets and Goodwill

The Company accounts for its business combinations in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”). SFAS 141 specifies the accounting for business combinations and the criteria for recognizing and reporting intangible assets apart from goodwill.

The Company records the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition, with any excess purchase price recorded as goodwill. Valuation of intangible assets and in-process research and development entails significant estimates and assumptions including, but not limited to, determining the timing and expected costs to complete development projects, estimating future cash flows from product sales, developing appropriate discount rates, estimating probability rates for the successful completion of development projects, continuation of customer relationships and renewal of customer contracts, and approximating the useful lives of the intangible assets acquired.

Intangible assets with an indefinite life are not amortized until their life is determined to be finite, and all other intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives. The Company is currently amortizing its acquired intangible assets with definite lives over periods ranging from one to ten years. Goodwill is not amortized but instead tested for impairment at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events (see “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets” below).

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews long-lived assets such as property, equipment, and definite lived intangible assets such as patents for impairment based on changes in circumstances that indicate their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. In making these determinations, the Company uses certain assumptions, including but not limited to (1) estimations of the fair market value of the assets, and (2) estimations of future cash flows expected to be generated by these assets, which are based on additional assumptions such as asset utilization, length of service the asset will be used in the Company’s operations and estimated salvage values. The Company also reviews its capitalized patent portfolio and records impairment charges when circumstances warrant, such as when patents have been abandoned or are no longer being pursued.

The Company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events that indicate goodwill may be impaired. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of April 1 using a two-step process. First, the Company determines if the carrying amount of any of its reporting units exceeds its fair value (determined using the discounted cash flows or market multiples based on revenues), which would indicate a potential impairment of goodwill associated with that reporting unit. If the Company determines that a potential impairment of goodwill exists, it then compares the implied fair value of the goodwill associated with the respective reporting unit to its carrying amount to determine if there is an impairment loss.

Contingent Liabilities

The Company provides for contingent liabilities when (1) it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and (2) the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Disclosure in the notes to the financial statements is required for loss contingencies that do not meet both these conditions if there is a reasonable possibility that a loss may have been incurred. See Note 12 for a discussion of loss contingencies in connection with pending and threatened litigation. The Company expenses as incurred the costs of defending legal claims against the Company.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue on product sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, such as when a purchase order is received from the customer, the price is fixed, title of the goods has transferred and there is a reasonable assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. The Company obtains written purchase authorizations from its customers for a specified amount of product at a specified price and considers delivery to have occurred at the time of shipment unless otherwise agreed in the applicable sales terms. The majority of the Company’s products have shipping terms under which the Company fulfills the obligation to deliver when the goods are delivered to the carrier at the Company’s shipping dock. This means that the buyer bears all risk of subsequent loss or damage to the goods. If inventory is maintained at a consigned location, revenue is recognized when the Company’s customer pulls product for its use and the title of the goods is transferred to the customer.

The Company provides its customers with limited rights of return for non-conforming shipments and product warranty claims. In addition, certain of the Company’s sales arrangements provide for limited product exchanges and the potential for reimbursement of certain sales costs. Specifically, the Company reviews historical sales returns and other relevant data and matches returns or other credits to the quarter when the sales were originally recorded. Based on historical return percentages and other relevant factors, the Company estimates its potential future exposure on recorded product sales. As a result, the Company records an allowance, which is recorded as a reduction of product revenue in the consolidated statements of income and as a reduction to accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company also records an asset for the estimated value of these product returns it believes will be returned to inventory and resold.

Revenue from contracts with the U.S. Government and certain non-government entities is recorded on the proportional performance method of accounting as contract expenses are incurred. Contract revenue represents reimbursement by various U.S. Government entities and other parties to aid in the development of new technologies. The contract funding may be based on either a cost-plus or a cost-share arrangement. The revenue recognized under each contract is determined based on cost estimates that include direct costs, plus an allocation for research and development, general and administrative and the cost of capital expenses. Cost-plus funding is determined based on actual costs plus a set percentage margin. For the cost-share contracts, the actual costs relating to the activities to be performed by the Company under the contract are divided between the U.S. Government and the Company based on the terms of the contract. The government’s cost share is then paid to the Company. Activities performed under these arrangements include research regarding SiC and GaN materials and devices. The contracts typically require submission of a written report that documents the results of such research in addition to other deliverables.

The revenue and expense classification for contract activities is based on the nature of the contract. For contracts under which the Company anticipates that funding will exceed direct costs over the life of the contract, funding is reported as contract revenue and all direct costs are reported as costs of contract revenue. For contracts under which the Company anticipates that direct costs of the activities subject to the contract will exceed amounts to be funded over the life of the contract, costs are reported as research and development expenses and related funding is reported as an offset of those expenses.

From time to time, the Company may enter into licensing arrangements related to its intellectual property. Revenue from licensing arrangements is recognized when earned and estimable. The timing of revenue recognition is dependent on the terms of each license agreement. Generally, the Company will recognize non refundable up-front license fees related to patent licenses immediately upon receipt of the funds if the Company has no significant future obligations to perform under the arrangement. However, the Company will defer recognition for licensing fees where the Company has significant future performance requirements, the fee is not fixed (such as royalties earned as a percentage of future sales), or the fees are otherwise contingent.

Accounts Receivable

For product sales, the Company typically invoices its customers at shipment for the sales order price of products shipped. For contract revenue, invoicing occurs based upon the terms of the specific research contract, typically one month in arrears for services rendered and any other allowable direct costs. Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The Company does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to any of its customers.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In cases where the Company becomes aware of circumstances that may impair a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations subsequent to the original sale, the Company will record an allowance against amounts due, and thereby reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount the Company reasonably believes will be collected. For all other customers, the Company recognizes an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due and consideration of other factors such as industry conditions, the current business environment and its historical experience.

Advertising

The Company expenses the costs of producing advertisements at the time production occurs and expenses the cost of communicating the advertising in the period in which the advertising is used. Advertising costs are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Research and Development

Research and development activities are expensed as incurred. For contracts under which the Company anticipates that direct costs will exceed amounts to be funded over the life of the contract, costs are reported as research and development expenses and related funding as an offset of those expenses.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the applicable period. Diluted earnings per share is determined in the same manner as basic earnings per share except that the number of shares is increased to assume exercise of potentially dilutive stock options and to add unvested restricted stock and contingently issuable shares using the treasury stock method, unless the effect of such increases would be anti-dilutive. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the employee must pay for exercising stock options, the amount of compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when the award becomes deductible are assumed to be used to repurchase shares.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes compensation expense in its consolidated financial statements for all share-based payments granted based on the fair value on the date of grant. Compensation expense is then recognized over the awards’ respective vesting periods.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, available-for-sale securities, accounts and interest receivable, accounts payable and other liabilities approximate their fair values at March 29, 2009 and June 29, 2008.

Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, along with net operating and capital loss carryforwards and credit carryforwards, if it is more likely than not that the tax benefits will be realized. To the extent a deferred tax asset cannot be recognized under the preceding criteria, valuation allowances are established. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

Taxes payable which are not based on income are accrued ratably over the period to which they apply. For example, payroll taxes are accrued each period end based upon the amount of payroll taxes that are owed as of that date; whereas, taxes such as property taxes and franchise taxes are accrued over the fiscal year to which they apply if paid at the end of a period, or they are amortized ratably over the fiscal year if they are paid in advance.

Foreign Currency Translation

For the Company’s international operations in which the functional currency is considered to be the local currency, the foreign currency is translated into the Company’s reporting currency, the U.S. Dollar, using exchange rates in effect at period end for assets and liabilities and average exchange rates during each reporting period for the results of operations. Adjustments resulting from the translation of these foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The foreign currency translation adjustment is not adjusted for income taxes since it relates to the Company’s indefinite investment in non-U.S. subsidiaries. Gains or losses on foreign currency transactions are recognized in current operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Fair Value Measurement

In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) for all financial assets and financial liabilities and for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and the resulting fair values calculated under SFAS 157 after adoption were not significantly different than the fair values that would have been calculated under previous guidance. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and enhances fair value measurement disclosure. See Note 5 for the expanded disclosures required by this standard regarding the Company’s fair value measurements.

In addition, in February 2008 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) also released FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13,” which amended SFAS 157 to exclude certain leasing transactions from the scope of SFAS 157.

Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities

The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”), at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal 2009. The adoption of the provisions of SFAS 159 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, as the Company has currently chosen not to elect the fair value option for any items not already required to be measured at fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP. SFAS 159 permits companies to make an election to carry certain eligible financial assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis, even if fair value measurement has not historically been required for such assets and liabilities.

Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Use in Future Research and Development Activities

The Company adopted the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 07-3, “Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities” (“EITF 07-3”) at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company’s adoption of EITF 07-3 did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements. EITF 07-3 requires nonrefundable advance payments to acquire goods or pay for services that will be consumed or performed in a future period in conducting research and development activities to be recorded as an asset and recognized as an expense when the research and development activities are performed.

Accounting for Business Combinations

The Company intends to adopt and apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”) to business combinations prospectively beginning in its first quarter of fiscal 2010. Earlier adoption is prohibited. Under SFAS 141(R), an entity is required to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value on the acquisition date. It further requires that acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred; that restructuring costs generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date; and that changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the measurement period be recognized as a component of provision for income taxes. In addition, acquired in-process research and development is capitalized as an intangible asset and amortized over its estimated useful life.

Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company intends to adopt SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”) beginning in its first quarter of fiscal 2010. Early adoption is prohibited, but upon adoption, SFAS 160 requires retrospective presentation and disclosure related to existing minority interests. The Company does not expect the impact of the adoption of SFAS 160 to be material to its consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and the accounting for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 also clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest and requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. In addition, SFAS 160 includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest.

Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets

The Company intends to adopt FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets,” in its first quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that adoption of this FSP will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). The FSP is intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of an intangible asset determined under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141 (R) and other U.S. GAAP principles.

Derivative Instrument and Hedging Disclosures

The Company adopted SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”) beginning in its second quarter of fiscal 2009. As SFAS 161 does not change the accounting for derivative instruments and as the Company currently does not hold any derivative instruments, its adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. SFAS 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows.

International Financial Reporting Standards

In November of 2008, the SEC released a proposed roadmap regarding the potential use by U.S. issuers of financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). IFRS is a comprehensive series of accounting standards published by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). Under the proposed roadmap, the Company may be required in fiscal 2015 to prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS. However, the SEC will make a determination in 2011 regarding the mandatory adoption of IFRS. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this potential change would have on its consolidated financial statements, and it will continue to monitor the development of the potential implementation of IFRS.

Guidance on Fair Value Measurements and Impairments

The Company intends to adopt the FASB’s recently issued (April 2009) FSP FAS 157-4 “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” in its fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. This FSP relates to determining fair values when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. It reaffirms what SFAS 157 states is the objective of fair value measurement—to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction) at the date of the financial statements under current market conditions. Specifically, it reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive.

The Company intends to adopt the FASB’s recently issued (April 2009) FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” in its fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. This FSP relates to fair value disclosures for any financial instruments that are not currently reflected on the balance sheet of companies at fair value. Prior to issuing this FSP, fair values for these assets and liabilities were only disclosed once a year. The FSP now requires these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value.

The Company intends to adopt the FASB’s recently issued (April 2009) FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” in its fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. This FSP addresses other-than-temporary impairments and is intended to bring greater consistency to the timing of impairment recognition, and provide greater clarity to investors about the credit and

noncredit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. The measure of impairment in comprehensive income remains fair value. The FSP also requires increased and more timely disclosures sought by investors regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and an aging of securities with unrealized losses.

The adoption of these three FASB Staff Positions concerning fair value measurements and impairments is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

FASB Accounting Standards Codification

As of July 1, 2009, the FASB expects to formally approve the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the single source of authoritative U.S. accounting and reporting standards, other than guidance issued by the SEC. At that time, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. The FASB’s primary goal in developing the Codification is to simplify user access to all authoritative US GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular accounting topic in one place. Following the FASB Board’s approval of the Codification as the single source of non-SEC authoritative accounting and reporting standards, the FASB will no longer consider new standards as authoritative in their own right. Instead, the new standards will serve only to provide background information about the issue, update the Codification, and provide the basis for conclusions regarding the change in the Codification. Therefore, beginning with its first quarterly filing of fiscal 2010, all Company references made to US GAAP will use the new Codification numbering system prescribed by the FASB. As the Codification is not intended to change or alter existing US GAAP, it is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 2. Acquisitions

Acquisition of LED Lighting Fixtures, Inc.

On February 29, 2008 the Company acquired LED Lighting Fixtures, Inc. (now Cree LED Lighting Solutions, Inc.) (“LLF”) through a wholly owned subsidiary. The Company acquired all of the outstanding share capital of LLF in exchange for total upfront consideration of $80.8 million, consisting of (1) $16.5 million in cash, (2) approximately 1.9 million shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $58.8 million, (3) the assumption of fully vested LLF employee stock options valued at $4.5 million, and (4) transaction costs of $1.0 million consisting primarily of professional fees incurred relating to attorneys, accountants and valuation advisors. Under the acquisition terms, additional consideration of up to $26.3 million would become payable to the former shareholders of LLF if defined product development targets and key employee retention measures were achieved over the three calendar years following the acquisition.

LLF achieved the defined product development targets for the calendar year ended December 31, 2008 and as a result, the Company made a cash payment in the amount of $4.4 million to the former shareholders of LLF in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, thus increasing goodwill in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If LLF meets the remaining defined product development targets during the following two calendar years, additional contingent cash payments totaling up to $21.9 million will be payable to the former shareholders of LLF. If such contingent payments occur, these will be considered as additional purchase price and result in an increase in goodwill.

The assets, liabilities, and operating results of LLF have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

Acquisition of COTCO Luminant Device Limited

On March 30, 2007, the Company acquired COTCO Luminant Device Limited, a Hong Kong company (now Cree Hong Kong Limited) (“COTCO”), from COTCO Holdings Limited, a Hong Kong company (now United Luminous International (Holdings) Limited) (“Holdings”). The Company acquired all of the outstanding share capital of COTCO in exchange for consideration consisting of approximately 7.6 million shares of the Company’s common stock and $77.3 million in cash. Under the acquisition terms, additional consideration of up to $125.0 million would become payable to Holdings or its designees in the event COTCO achieved specific EBITDA targets over the Company’s two full fiscal years following the acquisition.

COTCO achieved the required EBITDA target for fiscal 2008 such that the first tranche of the additional consideration in the amount of $60.0 million was earned. This resulted in additional purchase price and an increase to goodwill in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of June 2008. The Company made a cash payment in the amount of $60.0 million to the former shareholder of COTCO in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. If certain defined EBITDA targets are met in fiscal 2009 by the operations acquired through the COTCO acquisition, an additional contingent payment of up to $65.0 million will be due to the former shareholder. This additional contingent payment may be settled in cash or common stock at the Company’s option, subject to certain limitations. If this remaining contingent payment were to occur, it would result in an increase to purchased goodwill.

The assets, liabilities, and operating results of COTCO have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition and are reflected in all periods presented in the accompanying financial statements.

Note 3. Financial Statement Details

Accounts Receivable, net

The following is a summary of the components of accounts receivable, net (in thousands):


	March 29, 2009			June 29, 2008
Billed trade receivables	$	110,415		$	111,851
Unbilled contract receivables		4,157			6,188

		114,572			118,039
Allowance for sales return		(9,038	)		(5,944	)
Allowance for bad debts		(2,597	)		(1,719	)

Total accounts receivable, net	$	102,937		$	110,376

Inventories

The following is a summary of the components of inventories (in thousands):


	March 29, 2009			June 29, 2008
Raw material	$	16,505		$	16,924
Work-in-progress		34,507			33,498
Finished goods		37,133			35,715

		88,145			86,137
Inventory reserve		(10,677	)		(5,976	)

Total inventories, net	$	77,468		$	80,161

Note 4. Investments

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, Color Kinetics Incorporated (“Color Kinetics”) announced that it had been acquired. The transaction closed during the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2008 ended September 23, 2007, and as a result the Company liquidated its remaining 500,000 shares of Color Kinetics stock. The Company no longer holds an equity investment in Color Kinetics. The Company received proceeds of $17.0 million and recognized a pre-tax gain of $14.1 million from this transaction in the consolidated statement of income during its first quarter of fiscal 2008 ended September 23, 2007.

Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Under SFAS 157, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., "the exit price") in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation approaches, including quoted market prices and discounted cash flows. SFAS 157 also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are obtained from independent sources and can be validated by a third party, whereas, unobservable inputs reflect assumptions regarding what a third party would use in pricing an asset or liability. The fair value hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:

•

Level 1 - Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments that the Company is able to access. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these products does not entail a significant degree of judgment.

•

Level 2 - Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for instruments that are similar, or quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar instruments, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

•

Level 3 - Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

The financial assets for which the Company performs recurring fair value remeasurements are cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments. The financial assets for which the Company may be required to perform non-recurring fair value remeasurements (e.g., an impairment of assets) are any investments in privately-held companies. As of March 29, 2009, financial assets utilizing Level 1 inputs included cash equivalents such as money market deposits, and other investments with quoted prices available for identical items in active markets. Financial assets utilizing Level 2 inputs included corporate bonds, municipal bonds and other instruments. The Company does not have any significant financial assets requiring the use of Level 3 inputs.

The following table sets forth financial instruments carried at fair value within the SFAS 157 hierarchy and using the lowest level of input as of March 29, 2009 (in thousands):


	Financial Instruments Carried at Fair Value
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets:
Cash equivalents	$	227,762	$	—	$	—	$	227,762
Short-term investments		7,150		114,901		—		122,051
Long-term investments		9,481		28,678		—		38,159

Total assets	$	244,393	$	143,579	$	—	$	387,972

Realized gains and losses from the sale of investments are included in “Gain on sale of investments, net” and unrealized gains and losses are included as a separate component of equity, net of tax, unless the loss is determined to be “other-than-temporary.”

The Company evaluates its investments for possible impairment or a decline in fair value below cost basis that is deemed to be “other-than-temporary” on a periodic basis. It considers such factors as the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below cost basis, the financial condition of the investee, and its ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time that may be sufficient for an anticipated recovery in market value.

Note 6. Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Intangible Assets

The following table reflects the components of intangible assets (in thousands):


	March 29, 2009			June 29, 2008
Customer relationships	$	52,620		$	52,620
Developed technology		51,860			51,860
Patent and license rights		60,552			54,596

	$	165,032		$	159,076
Accumulated amortization		(48,882	)		(34,039	)

Intangible assets, net	$	116,150		$	125,037

Total amortization expense, including the amortization of acquisition related intangibles, patents and license rights, recognized during the three and nine months ended March 29, 2009 was $5.0 million and $14.9 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended March 30, 2008, total amortization expense, including amortization of acquisition related intangibles, patents and license rights, was $5.0 million and $14.8 million, respectively.

Goodwill

Goodwill increased from approximately $244.0 million at June 29, 2008 to approximately $248.5 million at March 29, 2009 due primarily to the contingent consideration payment related to the acquisition of LLF.

Note 7. Shareholders’ Equity

As of March 29, 2009, there remained approximately 4.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock approved for repurchase under a repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors that extends through June 2009. During the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2009, the Company did not repurchase any shares. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009, the Company repurchased approximately 0.1 million shares at an average price of $21.18 per share with an aggregate value of approximately $2.7 million.

Note 8. Earnings Per Share

The following computation reconciles the differences between the basic and diluted earnings per share presentations (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009		March 30, 2008		March 29, 2009		March 30, 2008
Basic:
Net income	$	4,015	$	5,660	$	20,630	$	24,994

Weighted average common shares		88,243		87,211		88,050		85,695

Basic earnings per share	$	0.05	$	0.06	$	0.23	$	0.29

Diluted:
Net income	$	4,015	$	5,660	$	20,630	$	24,994

Weighted average common shares - basic		88,243		87,211		88,050		85,695
Dilutive effect of stock options, unvested shares and ESPP purchase rights		596		1,694		622		1,811

Weighted average common shares - diluted		88,839		88,905		88,672		87,506

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.05	$	0.06	$	0.23	$	0.29

Potential common shares that would have the effect of increasing diluted earnings per share are considered to be antidilutive, and as such, these shares are not included in calculating diluted earnings per share. For the three and nine months ended March 29, 2009 there were 8.2 million and 7.9 million shares, respectively, not included in calculating diluted earnings per share because their effect was antidilutive. For the three and nine months ended March 30, 2008 there were 4.6 million and 4.3 million shares, respectively, not included in calculating diluted earnings per share because their effect was antidilutive.

Note 9. Comprehensive Income

The following presents a summary of activity in comprehensive income (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009		March 30, 2008		March 29, 2009		March 30, 2008
Net income	$	4,015	$	5,660	$	20,630	$	24,994
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments		219		5,379		513		5,384
Cumulative change in accounting principle		—		—		—		(36	)
Realized gain on sale of Color Kinetics stock, net of tax (Note 4)		—		166		—		(8,663	)
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax		510		1,295		1,781		1,461

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		729		6,840		2,294		(1,854	)

Comprehensive income	$	4,744	$	12,500	$	22,924	$	23,140

Note 10. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company currently has one equity-based compensation plan from which stock-based compensation awards can be granted to employees and directors. In addition, the Company has plans that have been terminated as to future grants, but under which options are currently outstanding. The Company also has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan that provides employees with the opportunity to purchase the Company’s common stock at 85% of the fair market value of the common stock at two designated times each year.

Stock Option Awards

The following table summarizes outstanding option awards as of March 29, 2009, and changes during the nine months then ended (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Number of Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share
Outstanding at June 29, 2008	8,865		$	27.76
Granted	1,816			22.56
Exercised	(498	)		15.71
Forfeited or expired	(371	)		26.98

Outstanding at March 29, 2009	9,812		$	27.44

Restricted Stock Awards

A summary of nonvested shares of restricted stock awards outstanding under the Company’s 2004 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan as of March 29, 2009, and changes during the nine months then ended, follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Number of Shares		Weighted- Average Grant- Date Fair Value per Share
Nonvested at June 29, 2008	290		$	24.44
Granted	174			22.61
Vested	(92	)		23.19
Forfeited	(3	)		24.48

Nonvested at March 29, 2009	369		$	23.89

Stock-Based Compensation Valuation and Expense

The Company accounts for its employee stock-based compensation using the fair value method. The fair value method requires the Company to estimate the grant date fair value of its stock-based awards and amortize this fair value to compensation expense over the requisite service period or vesting term.

To estimate the fair value of the Company’s stock option awards the Company currently uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. Due to the inherent limitations of option-valuation models available today, including future events that are unpredictable and the estimation process utilized in determining the valuation of the stock-based awards, the ultimate value realized by award holders may vary significantly from the amounts expensed in the Company’s financial statements.

For restricted stock awards, grant date fair value is based upon the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. This fair value is then amortized to compensation expense over the requisite service period or vesting term.

Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if expected or actual forfeitures differ from initial estimates.

Total stock-based compensation expense, net of amounts capitalized into inventory, was as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
Income Statement Classification	March 29, 2009		March 30, 2008		March 29, 2009		March 30, 2008
Cost of goods sold	$	1,013	$	569	$	3,198	$	2,210
Research and development		1,402		1,095		4,095		3,031
Sales, general and administrative		2,835		2,466		8,499		6,073

Total operating expenses		4,237		3,561		12,594		9,104

Total	$	5,250	$	4,130	$	15,792	$	11,314

Approximately $0.9 million and $1.2 million of stock-based compensation has been recorded in inventory in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of March 29, 2009 and June 29, 2008, respectively.

Note 11. Income Taxes

The variation between the Company’s effective tax rate and the U.S. statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to the consolidation of its foreign operations, which are generally subject to income taxes at lower statutory rates. A change in the mix of pretax income from these various tax jurisdictions can have a significant impact on the Company’s periodic effective tax rate.

Effective with the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is cumulatively more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement.

At June 29, 2008, the Company had recognized $17.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits. During the nine months ended March 29, 2009, the Company recognized a decrease in total unrecognized tax benefits of $11.2 million, as a result of the settlement of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examination for fiscal years 2006 and 2007 (and for fiscal years 1991-2005 for certain carryforward tax attributes claimed on the fiscal years 2006 and 2007 tax returns). Furthermore, the Company recognized an increase in unrecognized tax benefits of $0.2 million related to prior tax positions. As a result, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of March 29, 2009 is $6.8 million. Of the $6.8 million, $6.4 million represents tax positions that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate, as of the effective date of SFAS 141(R). Although the ultimate timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is highly uncertain, the Company believes it is reasonably possible that approximately $0.4 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next 12 months.

The Company’s policy is to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax expense line item in the consolidated statements of income. As of March 29, 2009, the Company had accrued $1.1 million of interest and penalties (which was previously recorded against goodwill when established and remains unchanged).

The Company files U.S. federal, U.S. state, and foreign tax returns. For U.S. federal purposes, the Company is generally no longer subject to tax examinations for fiscal years ended June 24, 2007 and prior. For foreign purposes, the Company is no longer subject to examination for tax periods 2001 and prior. During the nine months ended March 29, 2009, the Company settled its examination by the IRS for fiscal years 2006 and 2007. For U.S. state tax returns, the Company is generally no longer subject to tax examinations for fiscal years 2003 and prior (however the Company is subject to examination for carryforward tax attributes generated in years prior to fiscal 2003). The Company is currently under examination by the North Carolina Department of Revenue for fiscal years 2004 through 2007, and by the Texas Comptroller Office for fiscal years 2005 through 2006.

Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies

Please refer to the section entitled “Litigation” under Note 12—Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2008 for a description of material legal proceedings. The following is an update to the Company’s legal proceedings.

Bridgelux Patent Litigation

In December 2008, the Company, Boston University, and Bridgelux, Inc. (“Bridgelux”) entered into an agreement to resolve the litigation between the parties. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, all claims and counterclaims in the lawsuits have been dismissed without prejudice. The Company granted Bridgelux a license to the Company and Boston University patents at issue in the litigation, and Bridgelux agreed to pay a license fee and royalties. In addition, Bridgelux and the Company entered into a supply agreement under which the Company is to supply LED chips to Bridgelux.

Honeywell Patent Litigation

The Company entered into a Dismissal Agreement dated February 25, 2009 with Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”) and the Trustees of Boston University (the “University”) relating to the lawsuit brought by Honeywell in 2007 against the Company and Philips Lumileds Lighting Co. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Honeywell claimed in the lawsuit that the Company had infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,373,188 owned by Honeywell, and the Company, together with the University, asserted counterclaims against Honeywell alleging that Honeywell had infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 5,686,738 and 7,235,819 owned by the University and licensed exclusively to the Company. Pursuant to the Dismissal Agreement, the Company, the University and Honeywell have agreed to dismiss, without prejudice, all claims, counterclaims and defenses asserted by and against each other in the lawsuit, and the court entered the order of dismissal without prejudice on March 6, 2009.

Other Matters

The Company is currently a party to other unresolved legal proceedings incidental to its business. Although the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, it is management’s judgment that the outcome will not likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or its consolidated financial condition or results of operations. If an unfavorable resolution occurs, the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). All information contained in this report relative to future markets for our products and trends in and anticipated levels of revenue, gross margins and expenses, as well as other statements containing words such as “believe,” “project,” “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “target,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect” and “intend” and other similar expressions constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to business, economic and other risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown, and actual results may differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements we make are as of the date made and we have no duty to update them if our views later change. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this Quarterly Report. Examples of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical performance and any forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those described in “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report.

The following discussion is designed to provide a better understanding of our unaudited consolidated financial statements, including a brief discussion of our business and products, key factors that impacted our performance, and a summary of our operating results. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2008. Historical results and percentage relationships among any amounts in the financial statements are not necessarily indicative of trends in operating results for any future periods.

Overview of Our Business and Products

Cree, Inc. (“Cree,” “we,” “our,” or “us,”) is a manufacturer of semiconductor materials and devices primarily based on silicon carbide (SiC), gallium nitride (GaN) and related compounds. We currently focus on light emitting diode (LED) products, which consist of LED chips, LED components and LED lighting products. We also develop power and radio frequency (RF) products, including power switching and RF devices. Most of our revenues are generated from the following:

•

LED products. We derive the largest portion of our revenue from the sale of our LED products. Our LED products consist of our LED chips, LED components, including our XLamp^® LED components and high-brightness LED components, and LED lighting products.

•

Materials products. Revenues include the sale of wafers that are based on SiC and GaN, which are used in manufacturing LEDs, RF devices, and power devices and for research and development. They also include revenues from certain materials related licensing arrangements.

•

Power and RF products. These products include power switching devices made from SiC and also include RF devices made from SiC or GaN.

•

Contracts with government agencies. Government agencies provide us with funding to support the development of primarily SiC and GaN based new technology.

The majority of our products are produced through fabrication processes primarily conducted at our two main production facilities located in Durham, North Carolina and Huizhou, China. In some circumstances, where economically beneficial, we also use contract manufacturers for certain aspects of product fabrication.

Operating Segments

We currently operate our business as one reportable segment. In fiscal 2005, we operated our business in two reportable segments. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we announced the closure of the Cree Microwave segment, our silicon-based RF and microwave semiconductor business located in Sunnyvale, California. Effective December 25, 2005, we reported Cree Microwave as a discontinued operation.

Industry Dynamics

Our business is primarily focused on selling our LED products. LEDs are currently used to provide energy-efficient lighting in the automotive, mobile phone, liquid crystal display (LCD) backlighting, gaming, signals, indoor and outdoor illumination and video screen markets. LED lighting products are in the initial stages of introduction to the general illumination market. As LED technology continues to develop and improve, we believe the potential market for LED lighting applications will continue to expand.

Select industry factors affecting our business include, among others:

•

Overall demand for products and applications using LEDs. Our LEDs are used in a wide range of applications, including the developing market of LED lighting. The pace of adoption of LED lighting technology for the general illumination market will impact the demand for LEDs. Although we have seen increased adoption of LEDs in lighting products over the last several quarters, the recession has reduced demand for LEDs in consumer, mobile and automotive applications.

•

Economic Recession. The economic recession has reduced demand for some of our products and reduced visibility in demand from both our distributors and other customers. A prolonged recession may impact the viability of our vendors and customers, which could result in supply constraints from vendors and reduced customer demand. In addition, an inability to obtain financing could impact our customers’ ability to pay us on time or at all. This has increased the risk that our actual results could differ from our targets.

•

Intense and constantly evolving competitive environment. Competition in the industry is intense. Product pricing pressures exist as market participants often undertake pricing strategies to gain or protect market share. To remain competitive, market participants generally must increase product performance and reduce costs to support lower average sales prices. As overall market demand slows, pricing pressure generally increases.

•

Intellectual property issues. Market participants rely on patented and non-patented proprietary information relating to product design, manufacturing and other core competencies of their business. Protection of intellectual property is vital. Litigation and threatened litigation regarding intellectual property is common in our industry.

Highlights of the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2009

Like most other companies, we faced a challenging global economic environment in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, which resulted in lower demand for certain of our LED products, including those used in mobile, automotive, and some consumer applications. However, more than offsetting this decline was the continuing adoption of our LED products into other applications such as the general illumination market and some spot orders for SiC Schottky diodes, which helped the performance of our power and RF business.

The following is a summary of our financial results for the three months ended March 29, 2009:

•

Our year over year revenues increased approximately 5% to $131.1 million;

•

Our year over year gross margin percentage (gross profit as a percent of revenue) increased to 36.1% from 34.8% in the prior year;

•

We achieved income from operations of $2.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to income from operations of $3.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Net income per diluted share was $0.05 compared to $0.06 for the third quarter of fiscal 2008;

•

Combined cash, cash equivalents and marketable investments increased $39.4 million to $404.9 million at March 29, 2009 from $365.5 million at December 28, 2008;

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain consolidated statement of income data for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended
	March 29, 2009					March 30, 2008
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)	Dollars			% of Revenue		Dollars			% of Revenue
Net revenue	$	131,144		100.0	%	$	124,986		100.0	%
Cost of revenue		83,793		63.9	%		81,437		65.2	%

Gross profit		47,351		36.1	%		43,549		34.8	%

Research and development		17,071		13.0	%		15,405		12.3	%
Sales, general and administrative		21,043		16.0	%		21,076		16.9	%
Amortization of acquistion related intangibles		4,062		3.1	%		4,225		3.4	%
Loss (gain) on disposal or impairment of assets		2,255		1.7	%		(722	)	-0.6	%

Income from operations		2,920		2.3	%		3,565		2.8	%
Gain on sale of investments, net		13		0.0	%		—		0.0	%
Other non-operating income		28		0.0	%		129		0.1	%
Interest income, net		1,837		1.4	%		3,755		3.0	%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes		4,798		3.7	%		7,449		5.9	%
Income tax expense		768		0.6	%		1,787		1.4	%

Income from continuing operations		4,030		3.1	%		5,662		4.5	%
Loss from discontinued operations		(15	)	0.0	%		(2	)	0.0	%

Net income	$	4,015		3.1	%	$	5,660		4.5	%

Diluted EPS	$	0.05				$	0.06


	Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009					March 30, 2008
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)	Dollars			% of Revenue		Dollars			% of Revenue
Net revenue	$	419,145		100.0	%	$	357,371		100.0	%
Cost of revenue		265,935		63.4	%		237,286		66.4	%

Gross profit		153,210		36.6	%		120,085		33.6	%

Research and development		52,787		12.6	%		43,083		12.1	%
Sales, general and administrative		65,804		15.7	%		57,449		16.1	%
Amortization of acquistion related intangibles		12,186		2.9	%		12,321		3.4	%
Loss on disposal or impairment of assets		3,305		0.8	%		487		0.1	%

Income from operations		19,128		4.6	%		6,745		1.9	%
Gain on sale of investments, net		78		0.0	%		14,117		4.0	%
Other non-operating income		181		0.0	%		207		0.1	%
Interest income, net		7,168		1.7	%		11,986		3.4	%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes		26,555		6.3	%		33,055		9.2	%
Income tax expense		5,740		1.4	%		7,885		2.2	%

Income from continuing operations		20,815		5.0	%		25,170		7.0	%
Loss from discontinued operations		(185	)	0.0	%		(176	)	0.0	%

Net income	$	20,630		4.9	%	$	24,994		7.0	%

Diluted EPS	$	0.23				$	0.29

Revenues

Revenues were comprised of the following (in thousands, except percentages):


	Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			Change					March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			Change
LED products	$	112,644		$	105,654		$	6,990		7	%	$	363,113		$	298,159		$	64,954		22	%
Percent of total revenues		86	%		85	%							87	%		83	%
Materials products		5,624			6,327			(703	)	-11	%		17,281			22,329			(5,048	)	-23	%
Percent of total revenues		4	%		5	%							4	%		6	%
Power and RF products		8,609			6,179			2,430		39	%		18,771			14,976			3,795		25	%
Percent of total revenues		7	%		5	%							4	%		4	%

Total product revenues		126,877			118,160			8,717		7	%		399,165			335,464			63,701		19	%
Percent of total revenues		97	%		95	%							95	%		94	%
Contracts		4,267			6,826			(2,559	)	-37	%		14,398			21,907			(7,509	)	-34	%
Percent of total revenues		3	%		5	%							3	%		6	%
Upfront licensing fees		—			—			—		0	%		5,582			—			5,582		100	%
Percent of total revenues		0	%		0	%							1	%		0	%

Total revenues	$	131,144		$	124,986		$	6,158		5	%	$	419,145		$	357,371		$	61,774		17	%

LED Products

We derive the largest portion of our revenue from the sale of LED products which comprised approximately 86% and 85% of our total revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008, revenue from the sale of our LED products comprised approximately 87% and 83% of our total revenues, respectively.

Revenue from our LED products increased 7% to $112.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 from $105.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Revenues increased from the prior year quarter due to growth in sales of our lighting class LED products, particularly our LED components, which were partially offset by lower demand for our LED products for use in automotive, mobile and certain consumer products.

For the nine months ended March 29, 2009, revenue from our LED products increased approximately 22% to $363.1 million from $298.2 million for the nine months ended March 30, 2008. Strong sales growth from our LED components drove this year over year increase, more than offsetting a slight decline in LED chip sales. Additionally, sales in the first nine months of fiscal 2009 benefited from the acquisition of LED Lighting Fixtures, Inc. (now Cree LED Lighting Solutions, Inc.) (LLF) in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. The blended average selling price for our LED products increased approximately 30% and 41% for the three and nine month periods ended March 29, 2009, respectively, from the comparable prior year periods. This year over year increase was due to a shift in product mix to a higher proportion of revenues generated from sales of our LED components and LED lighting products.

Materials Products

Materials product sales comprised approximately 4% and 5% of our total revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively, compared to 4% and 6% of our total revenues for the nine month periods ended March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008, respectively.

Revenue from materials products decreased 11% to $5.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 from $6.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009, revenue from materials products decreased 23% to $17.3 million from $22.3 million for the nine months ended March 30, 2008. These decreases were due primarily to a lack of product sales to Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (Charles & Colvard) for use in gemstone applications. We currently have no backlog from Charles & Colvard and do not know when or if future orders will be placed.

Power and RF Products

Revenues from our power and RF products comprised approximately 7% and 5% of our total revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the nine month periods ended March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008, revenues from our power and RF products comprised approximately 4% of our total revenues.

Revenue from power and RF increased approximately 39% to $8.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 from $6.2 million in the third fiscal quarter of 2008. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009 revenue increased 25% to $18.8 million from $15.0 million for the nine months ended March 30, 2008. The increase in our power and RF business was primarily due to some spot orders for SiC Schottky diodes during the third quarter. In addition, for power products, the increase was due to an increase in unit shipments of products partially offset by a decrease in average selling prices. RF product revenues increased primarily due to improved product mix.

Contracts

Revenues from our contracts comprised approximately 3% and 5% of our total revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively, compared to approximately 3% and 6% of our total revenues for the nine month periods ended March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008, respectively.

Revenues from contracts decreased 37% to $4.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 from $6.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009 revenues from contracts decreased 34% to $14.4 million from $21.9 million for the nine months ended March 30, 3008. These decreases were in large part due to the completion of certain long-term contracts. In addition, fluctuations in contract revenue were due to changes in the timing of the initiation of research contracts, the value of those contracts and timing of the work performed.

Up-Front Licensing Fees

From time to time, we may enter into licensing arrangements related to our intellectual property. In certain instances, these arrangements may include up-front payments to us that, depending on the specific terms and underlying nature of the arrangement, may allow for immediate revenue recognition. For the three months ended March 29, 2009, we had no up-front license fee revenue. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009, we recognized $5.6 million of revenues related to up-front payments due for licensing arrangements. We had no such up-front licensing fee revenues in the comparable prior year periods.

Gross Profit

Cost of revenue includes materials, labor and overhead costs incurred internally or paid to contract manufacturers to produce our products. Gross profit and gross margin percentage (gross profit as a percentage of revenue) were as follows (in thousands, except percentages):


	Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			Change					March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			Change
Products, net	$	46,676		$	42,225		$	4,451		11	%	$	145,489		$	115,698		$	29,791		26	%
Product gross margin		36.8	%		35.7	%							36.4	%		34.5	%
Contracts, net		675			1,324			(649	)	-49	%		2,645			4,387			(1,742	)	-40	%
Contract gross margin		15.8	%		19.4	%							18.4	%		20.0	%
Upfront licensing fees		—			—			—		0	%		5,076			—			5,076		100	%
Licensing fee gross margin		0.0	%		0.0	%							90.9	%		0.0	%

Total gross profit	$	47,351		$	43,549		$	3,802		9	%	$	153,210		$	120,085		$	33,125		28	%
Total gross margin		36.1	%		34.8	%							36.6	%		33.6	%

Gross profit from continuing operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 increased approximately 9% to $47.4 million from $43.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009 gross profit increased approximately 28% to $153.2 million from $120.1 million for the nine months ended March 30, 2008. For the three months ended March 29, 2009 our gross margin percentage increased to 36.1% from 34.8% for the three months ended March 30, 2008. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009 our gross margin percentage increased to 36.6% from 33.6% for the nine months ended March 30, 2008. Factors contributing to the increase in gross margin percentage were changes in product mix to higher margin products and higher LED product yields. For the nine month period ended March 29, 2009, revenues from certain licensing arrangements contributed approximately $5.1 million of gross profit.

Research and Development

Research and development (R&D) expenses include costs associated with the development of new products, enhancements of existing products and general technology research. These costs consist primarily of employee salaries and benefits, occupancy costs, consulting costs and the cost of development equipment, R&D materials and supplies.

The following sets forth our research and development expenses in dollars and as a percentage of revenues (in thousands, except percentages):


	Three Months Ended										Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			Change				March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			Change
Research and development	$	17,071		$	15,405		$	1,666	11	%	$	52,787		$	43,083		$	9,704	23	%
Percent of total revenues		13	%		12	%						13	%		12	%

Research and development expenses in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 increased 11% to $17.1 million from $15.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009 research and development expenses increased 23% to $52.8 million from $43.1 million for the nine months ended March 30, 2008. The increase was due to our continued research and development activities focusing on higher brightness LED chips, new and improved LED components, new LED lighting products, costs related to the transition to larger wafers, and power and RF initiatives.

Sales, General and Administrative

Sales, general and administrative expenses are composed primarily of costs associated with our sales and marketing personnel and our executive and administrative personnel (for example, legal, finance, information technology and human resources) and consist of salaries and related compensation costs, consulting and other professional services (such as litigation and other outside legal counsel fees, audit and other compliance costs), facilities and insurance costs, and travel and other costs. The following table sets forth our sales, general and administrative expenses in dollars and as a percentage of revenues (in thousands, except percentages):


	Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			Change					March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			Change
Sales, general and administrative	$	21,043		$	21,076		$	(33	)	0	%	$	65,804		$	57,449		$	8,355	15	%
Percent of total revenues		16	%		17	%							16	%		16	%

Sales, general and administrative expenses from continuing operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 decreased slightly to $21.0 million from $21.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009, sales, general and administrative expenses increased 15% to $65.8 million from $57.4 million for the nine months ended March 30, 2008. Sales, general and administrative expenses were virtually flat comparing the three months ended March 29, 2009 to the three months ended March 30, 2008 as we were successful in controlling costs in response to uncertain market conditions. The increase in comparing the nine months ended March 29, 2009 to the nine months ended March 30, 2008 was due primarily to increased spending on sales and marketing as we expanded our sales channels and the acquisition of LLF during the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Additionally, costs increased due to the general expansion of our business and increased employee compensation costs.

Amortization of Acquisition Related Intangibles

As a result of our acquisitions, we have recorded various intangible assets that require amortization, principally customer relationships and developed technologies. Amortization of intangible assets related to our acquisitions is as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended							Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009		March 30, 2008		Change			March 29, 2009		March 30, 2008		Change
INTRINSIC	$	186	$	186	$	—		$	558	$	558	$	—
COTCO		3,090		3,778		(688	)		9,270		11,502		(2,232	)
LLF		786		261		525			2,358		261		2,097

Total	$	4,062	$	4,225	$	(163	)	$	12,186	$	12,321	$	(135	)

Amortization of acquisition related intangibles from continuing operations was $4.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to $4.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008, amortization of acquisition related intangibles from continuing operations was approximately $12.2 million and $12.3 million, respectively. Year over year, amortization expense attributable to the intangibles acquired through the COTCO Luminant Device Limited (now Cree Hong Kong Limited) (COTCO) acquisition declined as certain assets were fully amortized by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2009. This decline in amortization was partially offset by amortization of the intangibles acquired through the LLF acquisition that closed during the third quarter of fiscal 2008.

Loss on Disposal or Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, net

We operate a capital intensive business. As such, we dispose of a certain level of our equipment in the normal course of business as our production processes change, whether due to production improvement initiatives or product mix changes. Due to the risk of technological obsolescence or changes in our production process, we regularly review our equipment for possible impairments in value. The following table sets forth our loss on disposal or impairment of long-lived assets (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended							Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009		March 30, 2008			Change		March 29, 2009		March 30, 2008		Change
Loss (gain) on disposal or impairment of long-lived assets	$	2,255	$	(722	)	$	2,977	$	3,305	$	487	$	2,818

We recorded a loss of $2.3 million on the disposal of long-lived assets in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to a gain of $0.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009 we recorded a loss of $3.3 million compared to $0.5 million for the nine months ended March 30, 3008. These losses are due to the impairment or disposal of certain long lived assets, such as equipment, and the impairment of certain capitalized patent costs. For the three months ended March 29, 2009, we recorded a one-time loss of approximately $1.2 million related to the write-off of capitalized costs related to an abandoned manufacturing facility project. For the nine month period ended March 29, 2009, in addition to the aforementioned $1.2 million loss, we also recorded a loss of approximately $0.5 million related to the impairment of certain fixed assets associated with discontinued product initiatives.

Non-Operating Income

The following table sets forth our non-operating income (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended							Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009		March 30, 2008		Change			March 29, 2009		March 30, 2008		Change
Gain on sale of investments, net	$	13	$	—	$	13		$	78	$	14,117	$	(14,039	)
Other non-operating income	$	28	$	129	$	(101	)	$	181	$	207	$	(26	)
Interest income, net	$	1,837	$	3,755	$	(1,918	)	$	7,168	$	11,986	$	(4,818	)

During the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, we did not have any significant gains or losses realized from the sale of our investments. For the nine months ended March 29, 3009 we did not have any significant gains or losses; however, for the nine months ended March 30, 2008 we recorded a gain on the sale of investments of $14.1 million principally related to the sale of our remaining holdings of Color Kinetics Incorporated common stock in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

Net interest income was $1.8 million compared to $3.8 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008, net interest income was $7.2 million and $12.0 million, respectively. Year over year interest income decreased primarily due to a significant decline in interest rates.

We have historically invested portions of our available cash in fixed interest rate securities such as high-grade corporate debt, commercial paper, government securities, and other fixed interest rate investments. The primary objective of our investments is to preserve principal.

Other non-operating income is comprised primarily of miscellaneous foreign exchange gains and losses.

Income Tax Benefit or Expense

The following table sets forth our income tax expense in dollars and our effective tax rate from continuing operations (in thousands, except percentages):


	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			Change			March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			Change
Income tax expense	$	768		$	1,787		$	(1,019	)	$	5,740		$	7,885		$	(2,145	)
Effective tax rate on continuing operations		16.0	%		24.0	%					21.6	%		23.9	%		-2.2	%

We recorded income tax expense of $0.8 million for an effective tax rate of 16.0% from continuing operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 as compared to income tax expense of $1.8 million for an effective tax rate of 24.0% from continuing operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009 we recorded income tax expense of $5.7 million for an effective tax rate of 21.6% from continuing operations as compared to income tax expense of $7.9 million for an effective tax rate of 23.9% for the nine months ended March 30, 2008.

The year over year fluctuations in our effective tax rate are due to new and increased U.S. tax benefits resulting from current year investments in tax exempt obligations as well as increased domestic production activities realization. On October 3, 2008, the U.S. Government passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (H.R. 1424) which included a retroactive extension of the R&D tax credit. As a result of the changes in the applicable tax laws resulting from the Act, we estimated a benefit of approximately $0.5 million. During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we qualified for a reduced tax rate of 15% in China which resulted in a tax benefit of $0.2 million. This benefit was recorded as a discrete event for the three months ended March 29, 2009.

The variation between our effective tax rate and the U.S. statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to the consolidation of our foreign operations, which are generally subject to income taxes at lower statutory rates. A change in the mix of pretax income from these various tax jurisdictions can have a significant impact on our periodic effective tax rate. In addition, our effective tax rate may be negatively impacted by the lack of sufficient excess tax benefits (credits) in our additional paid in capital (APIC) pool in situations where our realized tax deductions for certain stock based compensation awards (such as non-qualified stock options and restricted stock) are less than those originally anticipated.

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Related Income Tax Benefit

In fiscal 2006, we discontinued the operations of our Cree Microwave subsidiary. The following table sets forth our income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			Change			March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008			Change
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(15	)	$	(2	)	$	(13	)	$	(185	)	$	(176	)	$	(9	)

For the three months ended March 29, 2009 our loss from discontinued operations was $15,000 compared to $2,000 for the three months ended March 30, 2008. For the nine months ended March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008 our loss from discontinued operations was $0.2 million. Our losses were primarily attributable to continued expenses arising from our Sunnyvale facility operating lease that was associated with the operations of our discontinued Cree Microwave subsidiary.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

We require cash to fund our operating expenses and working capital requirements, including outlays for research and development, and to make capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions and investments. Our principal sources of liquidity are cash on hand, marketable investments and cash generated from operations. Our ability to generate cash from operations has been one of our fundamental strengths and has provided us with substantial flexibility in meeting our operating, financing and investing needs. We have no debt or lines of credit and have minimal lease commitments. In the near term, we expect to fund our primary cash requirements through cash generated from operations, and cash and cash equivalents on hand.

From time to time, we evaluate strategic opportunities and potential investments in complementary businesses and we anticipate continuing to make such evaluations. We may also issue debt, additional shares of common stock, or use available cash on hand for the acquisition of complementary businesses or other significant assets or for other strategic opportunities.

Financial Condition

The following table sets forth our cash, cash equivalents and investments (dollars in thousands):


	March 29, 2009		June 29, 2008		Change
Cash and cash equivalents	$	244,667	$	261,633	$	(16,966	)
Short term investments		122,051		50,795		71,256
Long term investments		38,159		58,604		(20,445	)

Total cash and investments	$	404,877	$	371,032	$	33,845

Our liquidity and capital resources depend on our cash flows from operations and our working capital. Our total working capital increased to $502.9 million as of March 29, 2009 from $408.2 million at June 29, 2008, primarily due to positive cash flows from operations and cash generated through the exercise of employee stock options. The following table presents the components of our cash conversion cycle for our third quarter of fiscal 2009 and fourth quarter of fiscal 2008:


	Three Months Ended March 29, 2009		Three Months Ended June 29, 2008		Change
Days of sales outstanding ^(a)	71		73		(2	)
Days of supply in inventory ^(b)	83		80		3
Days in accounts payable ^(c)	(38	)	(37	)	(1	)

Cash conversion cycle	116		116		0

(a)

Days of sales outstanding (DSO) calculates the average collection period of our receivables. DSO is based on the ending net trade receivables and the most recent quarterly revenue for each period. DSO is calculated by adding ending accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, and dividing that sum by average net revenue per day for the current quarter (90 days).

(b)

Days of supply in inventory (DSI) measures the average number of days from procurement to sale of our product. DSI is based on ending inventory and most recent quarterly cost of sales for each period. DSI is calculated by dividing inventory by average cost of goods sold per day for the current quarter (90 days).

(c)

Days in accounts payable (DPO) calculates the average number of days our payables remain outstanding before payment. DPO is based on ending accounts payable and most recent quarterly cost of sales for each period. DPO is calculated by dividing accounts payable by average cost of goods sold per day for the current quarter (90 days).

Overall our cash conversion cycle, or days to cash, remained unchanged. We did achieve improvements in DSO and DPO, however this was offset by an increase in DSI. We continue to focus on managing our working capital in response to market conditions.

As of June 29, 2008, substantially all of our investments had investment grade ratings, and any such investments that were in an unrealized loss position at March 29, 2009 were in such position due to interest rate changes, sector credit rating changes or company-specific rating changes. As we intend and believe that we have the ability to hold such investments for a period of time that will be sufficient for anticipated recovery in market value, we currently expect to receive the full principal or recover our cost basis in these securities. When evaluating our investments for possible impairment, we review factors such as the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below our cost basis, the financial condition of the entity in which the investment is made, and our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time that may be sufficient for anticipated recovery in market value. The declines in value of the securities in our portfolio are considered to be temporary in nature and, accordingly, we do not believe these securities are impaired as of March 29, 2009.

We believe our current working capital and anticipated cash flows from operations will be adequate to meet our cash needs for our daily operations and capital expenditures for the remainder of fiscal 2009. We have and may continue to use a portion of our available cash and cash equivalents, or funds underlying our marketable securities, to repurchase shares of our common stock. With our strong working capital position, we believe that we have the ability to continue to invest in further development of our products and, when necessary or appropriate, make selective acquisitions or other strategic investments to strengthen our product portfolio, secure key intellectual properties, or expand our production capacity.

Cash Flows

In summary, our cash flows were as follows (in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended
	March 29, 2009			March 30, 2008		Change
Cash provided by operating activities	$	134,613		$	66,124	$	68,489
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(160,355	)		66,140		(226,495	)
Cash provided by financing activities		7,530			62,257		(54,727	)
Effects of foreign exchange changes		1,246			5,039		(3,793	)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	(16,966	)	$	199,560	$	(216,526	)

The following is a discussion of our primary sources and uses of cash in our operating, investing and financing activities.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $134.6 million for the nine months ended March 29, 2009 compared to $66.1 million for the nine months ended March 30, 2008. The increase in cash provided by operating activities during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 compared to the same period of the prior year is primarily due to the timing of cash receipts from our customers, improvements in the management of our inventory and increased year over year operating income.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $160.4 million for the nine months ended March 29, 2009 compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $66.1 million for the nine months ended March 30, 2008. Our investing activities primarily relate to transactions within our investments, strategic acquisitions, purchase of property, plant and equipment and purchase of patent and license rights. Cash used in investing activities increased as a result of the $60.0 million and $4.4 million contingent consideration payments related to the COTCO and LLF acquisitions, respectively, and net higher amounts of available cash and equivalents utilized to acquire investment grade securities. In the prior year we realized net cash inflows from our investment activities due to higher proceeds from maturities and sales of investments, including $17.0 million in proceeds from our sale of our equity investment in Color Kinetics Incorporated.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $7.5 million for the nine months ended March 29, 2009 compared to $62.3 million for the nine months ended March 30, 2008. Our cash flows from financing activities are principally composed of cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock primarily related to employee stock option exercises and employee stock plan purchases offset by cash outflows related to our repurchase of common stock. Cash provided by financing activities decreased year over year as we experienced a lower level of stock option exercise activity in the first nine months of fiscal 2009 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2008, in addition to increased repurchases of our common stock in the current year.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not use off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or related parties, nor do we use other forms of off-balance sheet arrangements. Accordingly, our liquidity and capital resources are not subject to off-balance sheet risks from unconsolidated entities. As of March 29, 2009, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

We have entered into operating leases primarily for certain of our facilities in the normal course of business. These arrangements are often referred to as a form of off-balance-sheet financing. Please refer to Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2008, in the section entitled “Contractual Obligations” for the future minimum lease payments due under our operating leases as of June 29, 2008.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

For information about our other critical accounting policies and estimates, see the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2008.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to our unaudited financial statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report for a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any, on our consolidated financial statements.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about our market risks, see Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2008.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in that they provide reasonable assurances that the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

We routinely review our internal control over financial reporting and from time to time make changes intended to enhance the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and will take action as appropriate. There have been no changes to our internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 that we believe materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 4T.

Controls and Procedures

Not applicable.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

The information required by this item is set forth under Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Described below are various risks and uncertainties that may affect our business. If any of the risks described below actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our business may be adversely affected by the global economic downturn, the continuing uncertainties in the financial markets and our, or our customers’, ability to access the capital markets.

The global economy is currently in a pronounced economic downturn. Global financial markets are continuing to experience disruptions, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, increases in unemployment rates, and uncertainty about economic stability. Given these uncertainties, there is no assurance that there will not be further deterioration in the global economy, the global financial markets and consumer confidence. We are unable to predict the likely duration and severity of the current global economic downturn or disruptions in the financial markets. If economic conditions deteriorate further, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our business and results of operations could be impacted by a number of follow-on effects of the disruptions in the financial markets, including the inability of our customers, or their customers, to obtain sufficient financing to purchase historical or projected quantities of our products. Our revenues and gross margins are dependent upon customer demand, and if our projections of their expenditures fail to materialize, due to reductions in customer purchases or otherwise, our revenues and gross margins could be adversely affected.

Additionally, the inability of our customers and suppliers to access capital efficiently, or at all, may have other adverse effects on our financial condition. For example, financial difficulties experienced by our customers or suppliers could result in product delays; increase accounts receivable defaults; and increase our inventory exposure. These risks may increase if our customers and suppliers do not adequately manage their business or do not properly disclose their financial condition to us.

Although we believe we have adequate liquidity and capital resources to fund our operations internally, in light of current market conditions, our inability to access the capital markets on favorable terms, or at all, may adversely affect our financial performance. The inability to obtain adequate financing from debt or capital sources could force us to self-fund strategic initiatives or even forgo certain opportunities, which in turn could potentially harm our performance.

Our results of operations, financial condition and business could be harmed if we were unable to balance customer demand and capacity.

As customer demand for our products changes, we must be able to ramp up or adjust our production capacity to meet demand. We are continually taking steps to address our manufacturing capacity needs for our products. If we are not able to increase our capacity or if we increase our capacity too quickly, our business and results of operations could be adversely impacted. If we experience delays or unforeseen costs associated with adjusting our capacity levels, we may not be able to achieve our financial targets.

Conversely, due to the proportionately high fixed cost nature of our business, when demand decreases, we may not be able to reduce manufacturing expenses or overhead costs at the same rate as demand, which could result in lower margins and adversely impact our business results.

If we fail to evaluate, implement and integrate strategic opportunities successfully, our business may suffer.

From time to time we evaluate strategic opportunities available to us for product, technology or business acquisitions. For example, in July 2006 we acquired INTRINSIC Semiconductor Corporation, in March 2007 we acquired COTCO, and in February 2008 we acquired LLF. If we choose to make acquisitions, we face certain risks, such as failure of the acquired business to meet our performance expectations, diversion of management attention, retention of existing customers of our current and acquired businesses, and difficulty in integrating the acquired business’s operations, personnel and financial and operating systems into our current business. For example, through our acquisitions of COTCO and LLF we acquired certain customer relationships, some of which are considered related parties (see Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2008), that we may not be able to successfully retain.

We may not be able to adequately address these risks or any other problems that arise from our recent or future acquisitions. Any failure to successfully evaluate strategic opportunities and address risks or other problems that arise related to any acquisition could adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We face significant challenges managing our growth.

We have experienced a period of significant growth over the past few years that may challenge our management and other resources. We continue to transform our business to support a global components and LED lighting product customer base. In order to manage our growth and change in our strategy effectively, we must continue to:

•

expand sales and marketing, research and development, technical support, administrative functions, and distribution capabilities to support a global customer base;

•

maintain adequate manufacturing facilities and equipment to meet customer demand;

•

maintain a sufficient supply of raw materials to support our growth;

•

expand the skills and capabilities of our current management team;

•

add experienced senior level managers; and

•

attract and retain qualified employees.

While we intend to focus on managing our costs and expenses during the extremely challenging economic environment, over the long term we expect to spend substantial amounts of money in supporting our growth and may have additional unexpected costs. We may not be able to expand quickly enough to exploit potential market opportunities.

We are also increasingly dependent on information technology to enable us to improve the effectiveness of our operations and to maintain financial accuracy and efficiency. In fiscal 2009, we implemented our primary financial reporting system at LLF and a portion of the business assumed in the COTCO acquisition. We plan to extend this roll-out to the remainder of the key COTCO operations before the end of fiscal 2009. If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build, implement and sustain the proper technology infrastructure, we could be subject to transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, loss of customers, business disruptions or loss of or damage to intellectual property through security breach.

In connection with our efforts to cost-effectively manage our growth, we have increasingly relied on subcontractors for production capacity, logistics support and certain administrative functions, such as payroll processing. If these service providers do not perform effectively, we may not be able to achieve the expected cost savings and may incur additional costs to correct errors or fulfill customer demand. Depending on the function involved, such errors may also lead to business disruption, processing inefficiencies or the loss of or damage to intellectual property through security breach, or impact employee morale. Our operations may also be negatively impacted if any of these service providers do not have the financial capability to withstand the continuing financial downturn.

If we are unable to effectively develop, manage and expand the distribution channels for our LED components and LED lighting products, our operating results may suffer.

We have expanded into new business channels that are different from those that we have historically operated in as we grow our business and sell LED lighting products and more LED components versus LED chips. If we are unable to effectively penetrate these new distribution channels to ensure our products are reaching the appropriate customer base, our financial results may be adversely impacted. In addition, if we successfully penetrate these new distribution channels, we cannot guarantee that customers will accept our products or that we will be able to manufacture and deliver them in the timeline established by our customers.

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and have evolving technical requirements.

The markets for our products are highly competitive. In the LED market, we compete with companies that manufacture or sell nitride-based LED chips as well as those that sell LED components. Competitors are offering new blue, green and white LEDs with aggressive prices and improved performance. These competitors may reduce average sales prices faster than we are able to reduce costs, and competitive pricing pressures may accelerate the rate of decline of our average sales prices. The market for SiC wafers is also becoming more competitive as other firms in recent years have begun offering SiC and GaN products or announced plans to do so.

As competition increases, in order to achieve our revenue growth objectives in fiscal 2009 and beyond, we need to continue to develop new products that enable our customers to win new designs and increase market share in key areas such as mobile products and general lighting class applications. Additionally, we anticipate that increased competition for these designs will result in pressure to lower sales prices of our products. Therefore, our ability to continually produce more efficient, higher brightness LEDs that meet the evolving needs of our customers at lower costs will be critical to our success. Competitors may also try to align with some of our strategic customers. This could mean lower prices for our products, reduced demand for our products and a corresponding reduction in our ability to recover development, engineering and manufacturing costs. Competitors could also invent new technologies that may make our products obsolete. Any of these developments could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Our LED revenues are highly dependent on our customers’ ability to produce and sell more integrated products using our LED products.

Because our customers generally integrate our LED products into the products that they market and sell, our LED revenues depend on getting our LED products designed into a larger number of our customers’ products and our customers’ ability to sell those products. For example, some of our current customers, as well as prospective customers, create white LED components using our blue LEDs, in combination with phosphors. Sales of blue LED chips are highly dependent upon our customers’ ability to procure efficient phosphors, develop high quality and highly efficient white LED components and gain access to the necessary intellectual property rights. Even if our customers are able to develop competitive white LED components using our blue LED chips, there can be no assurance that our customers will be successful in the marketplace.

We also have current and prospective customers that create lighting systems using our LED components. Sales of LED components for these applications are highly dependent upon our customers’ ability to develop high quality and highly efficient lighting products, including thermal design, optical design and power conversion. The lighting industry has traditionally not had this level of technical expertise for LED related designs, which may limit the success of our customers’ products. Even if our customers are able to develop efficient systems, there can be no assurance that our customers will be successful in the marketplace.

As a result of our continued expansion in new markets, such as LED components and LED lighting products, our traditional customers may reduce orders.

Through acquisitions and organic growth, we continue to expand in new markets, such as LED components and LED lighting products. In these new markets, some of our current customers may now perceive us as a competitor. In response, our customers may reduce their orders for our products. This reduction in orders could occur faster than our sales growth in these new markets, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Our operating results are substantially dependent on the development and acceptance of new products.

Our future success may depend on our ability to develop new and lower cost solutions for existing and new markets and for customers to accept those solutions. We must introduce new products in a timely and cost-effective manner, and we must secure production orders for those products from our customers. The development of new products is a highly complex process, and we historically have experienced delays in completing the development and introduction of new products. The successful development and introduction of these products depends on a number of factors, including the following:

•

achievement of technology breakthroughs required to make commercially viable devices;

•

the accuracy of our predictions for market requirements and evolving standards;

•

acceptance of our new product designs;

•

acceptance of new technology in certain markets;

•

the availability of qualified research and development personnel;

•

our timely completion of product designs and development;

•

our ability to expand sales and influence key customers to adopt our products;

•

our ability to develop repeatable processes to manufacture new products in sufficient quantities and at low enough costs for commercial sales;

•

our ability to effectively transfer products and technology developed in one country to our manufacturing facilities in other countries;

•

our customers’ ability to develop competitive products incorporating our products; and

•

acceptance of our customers’ products by the market.

If any of these or other factors becomes problematic, we may not be able to develop and introduce these new products in a timely or cost-effective manner.

Litigation could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

We are often involved in patent infringement litigation as described in Note 12, “Commitments and Contingencies,” in our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2008. Defending against existing and potential litigation will likely require significant attention and resources and, regardless of the outcome, result in significant legal expenses, which will adversely affect our results unless covered by insurance or recovered from third parties. If our defenses are ultimately unsuccessful, or if we are unable to achieve a favorable resolution, we could be liable for damage awards that could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Where necessary, we may initiate litigation to enforce our patent or other intellectual property rights. Any such litigation may require us to spend a substantial amount of time and money and could distract management from our day-to-day operations. Moreover, there is no assurance that we will be successful in any such litigation.

Our business may be impaired by claims that we, or our customers, infringe intellectual property rights of others.

Vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights characterize the semiconductor industry. These traits have resulted in significant and often protracted and expensive litigation. Litigation to determine the validity of patents or claims by third parties of infringement of patents or other intellectual property rights could result in significant legal expense and divert the efforts of our technical personnel and management, even if the litigation results in a determination favorable to us. In the event of an adverse result in such litigation, we could be required to:

•

pay substantial damages;

•

indemnify our customers;

•

stop the manufacture, use and sale of products found to be infringing;

•

incur asset impairment charges;

•

discontinue the use of processes found to be infringing;

•

expend significant resources to develop non-infringing products and processes; and/or

•

obtain a license to use third party technology.

There can be no assurance that third parties will not attempt to assert infringement claims against us, or our customers, with respect to our products. In addition, our customers may face infringement claims directed to the customer’s products that incorporate our products, and an adverse result could impair the customer’s demand for our products. We have also promised certain of our customers that we will indemnify them in the event they are sued by our competitors for infringement claims directed to the products we supply. Under these indemnification obligations we may be responsible for future payments to resolve infringement claims against them. From time to time we receive correspondence asserting that our products or processes are or may be infringing patents or other intellectual property rights of others. If we believe the assertions may have merit or in other appropriate circumstances, we take appropriate steps to seek to obtain a license or to avoid the infringement. However, we cannot predict whether a license will be available or that we would find the terms of any license offered acceptable or commercially reasonable. Failure to obtain a necessary license could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and costs and to suspend the manufacture of products.

There are limitations on our ability to protect our intellectual property.

Our intellectual property position is based in part on patents owned by us and patents exclusively licensed to us. We intend to continue to file patent applications in the future, where appropriate, and to pursue such applications with U.S. and foreign patent authorities.

However, our existing patents are subject to expiration and we cannot be sure that additional patents will be issued on any new applications around the covered technology or that our existing or future patents will not be successfully contested by third parties. Also, since issuance of a valid patent does not prevent other companies from using alternative, non-infringing technology, we cannot be sure that any of our patents, or patents issued to others and licensed to us, will provide significant commercial protection, especially as new competitors enter the market.

In addition to patent protection, we also rely on trade secrets and other non-patented proprietary information relating to our product development and manufacturing activities. We try to protect this information through appropriate efforts to maintain its secrecy, including requiring employees and third parties to sign confidentiality agreements. We cannot be sure that these efforts will be successful or that the confidentiality agreements will not be breached. We also cannot be sure that we would have adequate remedies for any breach of such agreements or other misappropriation of our trade secrets, or that our trade secrets and proprietary know-how will not otherwise become known or be independently discovered by others.

If our products fail to perform or fail to meet customer requirements or expectations, we could incur significant additional costs, including costs associated with the recall of those items.

The manufacture of our products involves highly complex processes. Our customers specify quality, performance and reliability standards that we must meet. If our products do not meet these standards, we may be required to replace or rework the products. In some cases, our products may contain undetected defects or flaws that only become evident after shipment. Even if our products meet standard specifications, our customers may attempt to use our products in applications they were not designed for or in products that were not designed or manufactured properly, resulting in product failures and creating customer satisfaction issues.

We have experienced product quality, performance or reliability problems from time to time and defects or failures may occur in the future. If failures or defects occur, we may need to recall our products. These recalls could result in significant losses due to:

•

costs associated with the removal, collection and destruction of the product recalled;

•

payments made to replace recalled product;

•

a rise in warranty expense and costs associated with customer support;

•

the write down or destruction of existing inventory subject to the recall;

•

lost sales due to the unavailability of product for a period of time;

•

delays, cancellations or rescheduling of orders for our products; or

•

increased product returns.

We also may be the target of product liability lawsuits, and could suffer losses from a significant product liability judgment against us if the use of our products at issue is determined to have caused injury. A significant product recall or product liability case could also result in adverse publicity, damage to our reputation, and a loss of customer confidence in our products.

Our operations in foreign countries, including China and other Asian countries, expose us to certain risks inherent in doing business internationally, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

As a result of acquisitions and organic growth, we have operations, manufacturing facilities and subcontract arrangements in foreign countries that expose us to certain risks. For example, our financial statements are presented in U.S. Dollars, which requires that results of foreign operations be translated at average exchange rates into U.S. Dollars for financial reporting purposes. As a result, fluctuations in exchange rates may affect our expenses and results of operations as well as the value of our assets and liabilities. We are also subject to other types of risks, including the following:

•

protection of intellectual property and trade secrets;

•

tariffs and other barriers;

•

timing and availability of export licenses;

•

rising labor costs;

•

disruptions in the infrastructure of the foreign countries where we operate;

•

difficulties in accounts receivable collections;

•

difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;

•

the burden of complying with foreign and international laws and treaties; and

•

the burden of complying with and changes in international taxation policies.

In some instances, we have been provided and may continue to receive incentives from foreign governments to encourage our investment in certain countries, regions, or areas. In particular, we have received and may continue to receive such incentives in connection with our operations in China, as the Chinese national and local governments seek to encourage the development of the technology industry in China. Government incentives may include tax rebates, reduced tax rates, favorable lending policies and other measures, some or all of which may be available to us due to our foreign operations. Any of these incentives could be reduced or eliminated by governmental authorities at any time. Any reduction or elimination of incentives currently provided to our operations could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

In addition, abrupt political change, terrorist activity and armed conflict pose a risk of general economic disruption in affected countries, which could result in an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We are subject to risks related to international purchases and sales.

We expect that revenue from international sales will continue to represent the majority of our total revenue. We also purchase a portion of the materials included in our products from overseas sources. As a result, our international sales and purchases are subject to numerous U.S. and foreign laws and regulations, including, without limitation, tariffs, trade barriers, regulations relating to import-export control, technology transfer restrictions, the International Traffic in Arms Regulation promulgated under the Arms Export Control Act, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the anti-boycott provisions of the U.S. Export Administration Act. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could be liable for administrative, civil or criminal liabilities, and in the extreme case, we could be suspended or debarred from government contracts or our export privileges could be suspended, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

International sales and purchases are also subject to a variety of other risks, including risks arising from currency fluctuations, collection issues and taxes. Our international sales are subject to variability as our selling prices become less competitive in countries with currencies that are declining in value against the U.S. Dollar and more competitive in countries with currencies that are increasing in value against the U.S. Dollar. In addition, our international purchases can become more expensive if the U.S. Dollar weakens against the foreign currencies in which we are billed.

We have not entered into any foreign currency derivative financial instruments; however, we may choose to do so in the future in an effort to manage or hedge our foreign exchange rate risk.

Variations in our production yields and limitations in the amount of process improvements we can implement could impact our ability to reduce costs and could cause our margins to decline and our operating results could suffer.

All of our products are manufactured using technologies that are highly complex. The number of usable items, or yield, from our production processes may fluctuate as a result of many factors, including but not limited to the following:

•

variability in our process repeatability and control;

•

contamination of the manufacturing environment;

•

equipment failure, power outages or variations in the manufacturing process;

•

lack of consistency and adequate quality and quantity of piece parts and other raw materials;

•

losses from broken wafers, inventory shrinkage or human errors;

•

defects in packaging either within our facilities or at our subcontractors; and

•

any transitions or changes in our production process, planned or unplanned.

In the past, we have experienced difficulties in achieving acceptable yields on new products, which has adversely affected our operating results. We may experience similar problems in the future, and we cannot predict when they may occur or their severity.

In addition, our ability to convert volume manufacturing to larger diameter substrates can be an important factor in allowing for a more cost effective manufacturing process. If we are unable to make this transition in a timely or cost effective manner, our results could be negatively impacted.

In some instances, we may offer products for future delivery at prices based on planned yield improvements or increased cost efficiencies from other production advances. Failure to achieve these planned improvements or advances could significantly affect our margins and operating results.

We depend on a limited number of customers for a substantial portion of our revenues, and the loss of, or a significant reduction in purchases by one or more of these customers could adversely affect our operating results.

We receive a significant amount of our revenues from a limited number of customers. For example, in fiscal 2008, two customers, Sumitomo Corporation and Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd, individually accounted for more than 10% of our net revenue, for a combined total of 26% of our total net revenue. Sales to these and most of our other large customers are made on a purchase order basis, which does not generally require any long-term customer commitments. Therefore, these customers may alter their past purchasing behavior with little or no notice to us for various reasons, including: developing their own product solutions; choosing to purchase product from our competitors; or experiencing a reduction in their market share in the markets for which they purchase our products. If our customers alter their past (or expected) purchasing behavior, or if we encounter any problems collecting amounts due from them, our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted.

We rely on a few key sole source and limited source suppliers, and are subject to high price volatility on certain commodity inputs.

We depend on a small number of sole source and limited source suppliers for certain raw materials, components, services and equipment used in manufacturing our products, including key materials and equipment used in critical stages of our manufacturing processes. Although alternative sources generally exist for these items, qualification of many of these alternative sources could take up to six months or longer. Where possible, we attempt to identify alternative sources for our sole and limited source suppliers.

We generally purchase these sole or limited source items with purchase orders, and we have limited guaranteed supply arrangements with such suppliers. We do not control the time and resources that these suppliers devote to our business, and we cannot be sure that these suppliers will perform their obligations to us. In the past, we have experienced decreases in our production yields when suppliers have varied from previously agreed upon specifications that have impacted our cost of sales.

Additionally, the inability of our suppliers to access capital efficiently could cause disruptions in their businesses, thereby negatively impacting ours. This risk may increase if the general economic downturn negatively affects key suppliers or a significant number of our other suppliers. Any delay in product delivery or other interruption or variation in supply from these suppliers could prevent us from meeting commercial demand for our products. If we were to lose key suppliers, our key suppliers were unable to support our demand or we were unable to identify and qualify alternative suppliers, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted or hampered significantly.

In our fabrication process we consume a number of precious metals and other commodities, which are subject to high price volatility. Our operating margins could be significantly affected if we are not able to anticipate price changes correctly, or if we are not able to pass along price increases to our customers.

If government agencies discontinue or curtail their funding for our research and development programs, our business may suffer.

Changes in federal budget priorities could adversely affect our contract revenue. Historically, government agencies have funded a significant portion of our research and development activities. When the government changes budget priorities, such as in times of war or financial crisis, our funding has the risk of being redirected to other programs. Government contracts are also subject to the risk that the government agency may not appropriate and allocate all funding contemplated by the contract. In addition, our government contracts generally permit the contracting authority to terminate the contracts for the convenience of the government. The full value of the contracts would not be realized if they were prematurely terminated. Furthermore, we may be unable to incur sufficient allowable costs to generate the full estimated contract values and there is some risk that any technologies developed under these contracts may not have commercial value. If government funding is discontinued or reduced, our ability to develop or enhance products could be limited, and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Our failure to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations worldwide could harm our business and results of operations.

The manufacturing, assembling and testing of our products require the use of hazardous materials that are subject to a broad array of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Our failure to comply with any of these applicable laws or regulations could result in:

•

regulatory penalties, fines and legal liabilities;

•

suspension of production;

•

alteration of our fabrication, assembly and test processes; and

•

curtailment of our operations or sales.

In addition, our failure to manage the use, transportation, emission, discharge, storage, recycling or disposal of hazardous materials could subject us to increased costs or future liabilities. Existing and future environmental laws and regulations could also require us to acquire pollution abatement or remediation equipment, modify our product designs or incur other expenses associated with such laws and regulations. Many new materials that we are evaluating for use in our operations may be subject to regulation under

existing or future environmental laws and regulations that may restrict our use of one or more of such materials in our manufacturing, assembly and test processes or products. Any of these restrictions could harm our business and results of operations by increasing our expenses or requiring us to alter our manufacturing processes.

Changes in our effective tax rate may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our future effective tax rates may be adversely affected by a number of factors including:

•

changes in government administrations, such as the Presidency and Congress of the US as well as in the states and countries in which we operate;

•

changes in tax laws or interpretation of such tax laws and changes in generally accepted accounting principles;

•

the jurisdiction in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed;

•

the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various authorities;

•

changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities;

•

adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax returns;

•

increases in expenses not deductible for tax purposes, including write-offs of acquired in-process research and development and impairment of goodwill in connection with acquisitions;

•

changes in available tax credits;

•

the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions;

•

the lack of sufficient excess tax benefits (credits) in our additional paid in capital (“APIC”) pool in situations where our realized tax deductions for certain stock-based compensation awards (such as non-qualified stock options and restricted stock) are less than those originally anticipated; and

•

the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings for which we have not previously provided for U.S. taxes, or any changes in legislation that may result in these earnings being taxed within the U.S., regardless of our decision regarding repatriation of funds.

Any significant increase in our future effective tax rates could adversely impact net income for future periods. In addition, the determination of our income tax provision requires complex estimations, significant judgments and significant knowledge and experience concerning the applicable tax laws. To the extent our income tax liability materially differs from our income tax provisions and accruals due to factors, including the above, which were not anticipated at the time we estimated our tax provision, our net income or cash flows could be adversely affected.

In order to compete, we must attract, motivate and retain key employees, and our failure to do so could harm our results of operations.

In order to compete, we must attract, motivate and retain executives and other key employees, including those in managerial, technical, sales, marketing and support positions. Hiring and retaining qualified executives, scientists, engineers, technical staff and sales personnel are critical to our business, and competition for experienced employees in our industry can be intense. To help attract, motivate and retain key employees, we use stock-based compensation awards such as non-qualified stock options and restricted stock. If the value of such stock awards does not appreciate, as measured by the performance of the price of our common stock, or if our share-based compensation otherwise ceases to be viewed as a valuable benefit, our ability to attract, retain and motivate employees could be weakened, which could harm our business and results of operations.

We are exposed to fluctuations in the market value of our investment portfolio and in interest rates, and therefore, impairment of our investments or lower investment income could harm our earnings.

We are exposed to market value and the inherent interest rate risk related to our investment portfolio. We have historically invested portions of our available cash in fixed interest rate securities such as high-grade corporate debt, commercial paper, government securities and other fixed interest rate investments. The primary objective of our investments is to preserve principal and we only acquire investments rated “AAA” grade or better. However, our investments are not all FDIC insured and may lose value and/or become illiquid regardless of their rating; in addition, declines in underlying interest rates will have a negative impact on the income generated from our investments, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations.

We may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired.

We are required under generally accepted accounting principles to review our amortizable intangible assets and investments in equity interests for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances indicating that the carrying value of our amortizable intangible assets or goodwill may not be recoverable include a decline in stock price and market capitalization and slower growth rates in our industry. We may be required to record a significant charge to earnings in our consolidated financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our amortizable intangible assets or goodwill is determined to exist. This could adversely impact our results of operations.

Catastrophic events may disrupt our business.

A disruption or failure of our systems or operations in the event of a natural disaster or man-made catastrophic event could cause delays in completing sales, continuing production or performing other critical functions of our business, especially in the case of our single site for SiC wafer and LED fabrication. A catastrophic event that results in the destruction or disruption to our supply chain or any of our critical business or information technology systems could severely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations and, as a result, our operating results could be adversely affected.

Our results of operations could vary as a result of the methods, estimates and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies, including changes in the accounting regulations to be applied.

The methods, estimates and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies have a significant impact on our results of operations (see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2008). Such methods, estimates and judgments are, by their nature, subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and factors may arise over time that lead us to change our methods, estimates and judgments. Changes in those methods, estimates and judgments could significantly affect our results of operations.

Likewise, our results of operations may be impacted due to changes in the accounting rules to be applied, such as the increased use of fair value measurement rules and the potential requirement that U.S. registrants prepare financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards.

Our stock price may be volatile.

Historically, our common stock has experienced substantial price volatility, particularly as a result of significant fluctuations in our revenue, earnings and margins over the past few years and variations between our actual financial results and the published expectations of analysts. If our future operating results or margins are below the expectations of stock market analysts or our investors, our stock price will likely decline.

Speculation in the press or investment community about our strategic position, financial condition, results of operations, or significant transactions can also cause changes in our stock price. In particular, speculation around our opportunities for energy efficient lighting may have dramatic effects upon our stock price, especially as various government agencies announce their planned investments in energy efficient technology, including lighting.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6.

Exhibits

The following exhibits are being filed herewith and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K:


Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


				CREE, INC.
Date: April 22, 2009

				/s/ John T. Kurtzweil
				John T. Kurtzweil Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Chief Accounting Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.