MFS CHARTER INCOME TRUST N-CSR
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF

REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number 811-05822

MFS CHARTER INCOME TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Susan S. Newton

Massachusetts Financial Services Company

111 Huntington Avenue

Boston, Massachusetts 02199

(Name and address of agents for service)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 954-5000

Date of fiscal year end: November 30

Date of reporting period: November 30, 2014


Table of Contents
ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.


Table of Contents

ANNUAL REPORT

November 30, 2014

 

LOGO

 

MFS® CHARTER INCOME TRUST

 

LOGO

 

MCR-ANN

 


Table of Contents

MFS® CHARTER INCOME TRUST

New York Stock Exchange Symbol: MCR

 

Letter from the Chairman     1   
Portfolio composition     2   
Management review     4   
Performance summary     7   
Portfolio managers’ profiles     10   
Dividend reinvestment and cash purchase plan     11   
Portfolio of investments     12   
Statement of assets and liabilities     44   
Statement of operations     45   
Statements of changes in net assets     46   
Statement of cash flows     47   
Financial highlights     48   
Notes to financial statements     50   
Report of independent registered public accounting firm     63   
Results of shareholder meeting     64   
Trustees and officers     65   
Board review of investment advisory agreement     71   
Proxy voting policies and information     75   
Quarterly portfolio disclosure     75   
Further information     75   
Federal tax information     75   
MFS® privacy notice     76   
Contact information    back cover   

 

NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE


Table of Contents

LOGO

 

LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN

 

Dear Shareholders:

The U.S. economy stands on firmer ground than the rest of the world, expanding at an annualized pace of more than 3%. The labor market has regained momentum,

consumer confidence has improved and gasoline prices have fallen sharply. Accordingly, expectations are strong for continued economic recovery into 2015.

In contrast, all other major economic regions are struggling. The eurozone economy is barely expanding, and deflation is a growing concern. The European Central Bank (ECB) has attempted to stimulate the region’s economy, and many market participants believe the ECB will introduce large-scale asset purchases.

Despite Japan’s efforts to strengthen its economy, its sales tax increase last spring tipped the country into a technical recession,

leading to additional monetary stimulus from the Bank of Japan. The Chinese economy is slowing down, and its growth rate will likely continue to fall as it transitions to a more sustainable basis.

As always, active risk management is integral to how we at MFS® manage your investments. We use a collaborative process, sharing insights across asset classes, regions and economic sectors. Our global investment team uses a diversified, multidisciplined, long-term approach.

Applying proven principles, such as asset allocation and diversification, can best serve investors over the long term. We are confident that this approach can help you as you work with your financial advisors to reach your goals in the years ahead.

Respectfully,

 

LOGO

Robert J. Manning

Chairman

MFS Investment Management

January 15, 2015

The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change and may not be relied upon for investment advice. No forecasts can be guaranteed.

 

1


Table of Contents

PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

 

Portfolio structure (i)

 

LOGO

 

Fixed income sectors (i)  
High Yield Corporates     64.0%   
Non-U.S. Government Bonds     24.6%   
Emerging Markets Bonds     13.0%   
Investment Grade Corporates     10.2%   
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities     3.6%   
U.S. Government Agencies     3.3%   
Mortgage-Backed Securities     2.8%   
Floating Rate Loans     1.8%   
Collateralized Debt Obligations     0.2%   
Asset-Backed Securities     0.2%   
U.S. Treasury Securities     (14.8)%   
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i)    
AAA     5.7%   
AA     3.1%   
A     5.8%   
BBB     19.2%   
BB     30.7%   
B     33.7%   
CCC     7.5%   
C     0.1%   
U.S. Government     5.7%   
Federal Agencies     6.1%   
Not Rated     (8.7)%   
Non-Fixed Income (o)     0.0%   
Cash & Other     (8.9)%   
Portfolio facts (i)   
Average Duration (d)     5.6   
Average Effective Maturity (m)     7.4 yrs.   
Issuer country weightings (i)(x)   
United States     45.9%   
Germany     8.3%   
Japan     6.6%   
United Kingdom     5.0%   
Canada     4.1%   
Italy     3.0%   
Mexico     2.6%   
France     2.0%   
Netherlands     1.8%   
Other Countries     20.7%   
 

 

2


Table of Contents

Portfolio Composition – continued

 

 

(a) For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are assigned to underlying securities utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). Securities rated BBB or higher are considered investment grade. All ratings are subject to change. U.S. Government includes securities issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Federal Agencies includes rated and unrated U.S. Agency fixed-income securities, U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities. Not Rated includes fixed income securities, including fixed income futures contracts, which have not been rated by any rating agency. Non-Fixed Income includes equity securities (including convertible bonds and equity derivatives) and commodities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. The fund is not rated by these agencies.
(d) Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move.
(i) For purposes of this presentation, the components include the value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if any. These amounts may be negative from time to time. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than value. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts.
(m) In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity.
(o) Less than 0.1%.
(x) Represents the portfolio’s exposure to issuer countries as a percentage of a portfolio’s net assets. For purposes of this presentation, United States includes Cash & Other.

From time to time Cash & Other may be negative due to borrowings for leverage transactions, timing of cash receipts, and/or equivalent exposure from any derivative holdings.

Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio.

Cash & Other can include cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities.

Percentages are based on net assets as of 11/30/14.

The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.

 

3


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT REVIEW

Summary of Results

MFS Charter Income Trust (“fund”) is a closed-end fund. The fund’s investment objective is to seek high current income, but may also consider capital appreciation. MFS normally invests the fund’s assets primarily in debt instruments. MFS normally invests the fund’s assets in corporate bonds of US and/or foreign issuers, US Government securities, foreign government securities, mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities of US and/or foreign issuers, and/or debt instruments of issuers located in emerging market countries. MFS allocates the fund’s assets across these categories with a view toward broad diversification across and within these categories.

For the twelve months ended November 30, 2014, shares of the MFS Charter Income Trust provided a total return of 6.69%, at net asset value and a total return of 4.68%, at market value. This compares with a return of 4.52% for the fund’s benchmark, the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index. Over the same period, the fund’s other benchmark, the MFS Charter Income Trust Blended Index (“Blended Index”), generated a return of 5.92%. The Blended Index reflects the blended returns of various fixed income market indices, with percentage allocations to each index designed to resemble the fixed income allocations of the fund. The market indices and related percentage allocations used to compile the Blended Index are set forth in the Performance Summary.

The performance commentary below is based on the net asset value performance of the fund which reflects the performance of the underlying pool of assets held by the fund. The total return at market value represents the return earned by owners of the shares of the fund which are traded publicly on the exchange.

Market Environment

Prior to the reporting period, the decision by the US Federal Reserve (“Fed”) to postpone the tapering of its quantitative easing (“QE”) program surprised markets. Favorable market reactions were tempered, however, by tense negotiations over US fiscal policy which resulted in a 16-day partial shutdown of the federal government (from October 1 through October 16, 2013) and a short-term extension in the debt ceiling. The volatility was short-lived, however, as an extension of budget and debt ceiling deadlines allowed the government to re-open, and subsequent economic data reflected moderate but resilient US growth. Also well-received was the decision by the European Central Bank (“ECB”) to cut its policy rate as inflation pressures waned in the region. In addition, equity investors appeared to have concluded that there would be no major change in US monetary policy as a result of the nomination of Janet Yellen as the new Fed Chair for a term beginning in early 2014 and that tapering would have no major impact on the trajectory.

A generally risk-friendly, carry trade environment persisted from February 2014 until mid-year. While geopolitical tensions flared in the Middle East and Russia/Ukraine, any market setbacks were short-lived, as improving economic growth in the US coupled with prospects for easier monetary policy in regions with slowing growth such as Japan, Europe and China, supported risk assets. For example, the ECB cut policy interest rates into negative territory and, by the end of the period, expectations were

 

4


Table of Contents

Management Review – continued

 

for additional rate cuts and the announcement for non-conventional easing measures. Similarly, the Bank of Japan surprised markets late in the period with fresh stimulus measures given lackluster growth trends. The related decline in developed market government bond yields and credit spreads were also supportive for equity markets. At the end of the period, the US equity market was trading at all-time highs. However, credit markets did not fare as well in the second half of 2014, particularly US high yield and emerging market debt. The higher weightings of oil and gas credits in these asset classes resulted in widening spreads and increased volatility as oil prices began to decline in an accelerated fashion in the fourth quarter.

Contributors to Performance

During the reporting period the portion of the fund’s return derived from yield, which was greater than that of the Blended Index, contributed to relative performance. A greater exposure to corporate bonds in the industrials sector benefited relative performance as the sector turned in positive performance over the period. Strong bond selection, particularly in the industrials and telecommunication sectors, also strengthened relative returns.

The fund employs leverage which has been created through the use of loan agreements with a bank. To the extent that investments are purchased through the use of leverage, the fund’s net asset value will increase or decrease at a greater rate than a comparable unleveraged fund. During the reporting period, the fund’s use of leverage enhanced its absolute positive returns.

Detractors from Performance

Relative to the Blended Index, the fund’s greater exposure to “BB” and lower rated (r) bonds was a negative factor for relative performance as lower quality credit spreads widened during the period.

The fund’s lesser exposure to shifts in the long portion (centered around maturities of 10 or more years) of the yield curve (y), also negatively impacted relative performance as the curve flattened during the period.

Respectfully,

 

Richard Hawkins   William Adams   Ward Brown   David Cole
Portfolio Manager   Portfolio Manager   Portfolio Manager   Portfolio Manager
Pilar Gomez-Bravo   Joshua Marston   Robert Persons   Matthew Ryan
Portfolio Manager   Portfolio Manager   Portfolio Manager   Portfolio Manager
Erik Weisman      
Portfolio Manager      

 

(r) Bonds rated “BBB”, “Baa”, or higher are considered investment grade; bonds rated “BB”, “Ba”, or below are considered non-investment grade. The source for bond quality ratings is Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch, Inc. and are applied using the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). For securities which are not rated by any of the three agencies, the security is considered Not Rated.

 

5


Table of Contents

Management Review – continued

 

(y) A yield curve graphically depicts the yields of different maturity bonds of the same credit quality and type; a normal yield curve is upward sloping, with short-term rates lower than long-term rates.

The views expressed in this report are those of the portfolio managers only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover and do not necessarily reflect the views of MFS or any other person in the MFS organization. These views are subject to change at any time based on market or other conditions, and MFS disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice or an indication of trading intent on behalf of any MFS portfolio. References to specific securities are not recommendations of such securities, and may not be representative of any MFS portfolio’s current or future investments.

 

6


Table of Contents

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY THROUGH 11/30/14

The following chart represents the fund’s historical performance in comparison to its benchmark(s). Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost; current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. The performance shown does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the sale of fund shares. Performance data shown represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results.

Price Summary for MFS Charter Income Trust

                   Date        Price     

 

Year Ended 11/30/14

     Net Asset Value        11/30/14         $10.18  
              11/30/13         $10.17  
     New York Stock Exchange Price        11/30/14           $8.81  
              5/01/14  (high) (t)         $9.38  
              10/15/14  (low) (t)         $8.65  
                11/30/13           $8.97    

Total Returns vs Benchmarks

 

         

 

Year Ended 11/30/14

     MFS Charter Income Trust at       
    

New York Stock Exchange Price (r)

     4.68%  
    

Net Asset Value (r)

     6.69%  
     Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer
Capped Index (f)
     4.52%  
     MFS Charter Income Trust Blended Index (f)(w)      5.92%  
     Barclays U.S. Credit Bond Index (f)      7.25%  
     Barclays U.S. Government/Mortgage Bond Index (f)      4.53%  
     Citigroup World Government Bond Non-Dollar
Hedged Index (f)
     7.87%  
       JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global (f)      9.28%    

 

(f) Source: FactSet Research Systems Inc.

 

(r) Includes reinvestment of dividends and capital gain distributions.

 

(t) For the period December 1, 2013 through November 30, 2014.

 

7


Table of Contents

Performance Summary – continued

 

 

(w) As of November 30, 2014, the MFS Charter Income Trust Blended Index was comprised of 15.2% Citigroup World Government Bond Non-Dollar Hedged Index, 12.8% JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global, 42% Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index, 10% Barclays U.S. Credit Bond Index, and 20% Barclays U.S. Government/Mortgage Bond Index.

Benchmark Definitions

Barclays U.S. Credit Bond Index – a market capitalization-weighted index that measures the performance of publicly issued, SEC-registered, U.S. corporate and specified foreign debentures and secured notes that meet specified maturity, liquidity, and quality requirements.

Barclays U.S. Government/Mortgage Bond Index – measures debt issued by the U.S. Government, and its agencies, as well as mortgage-backed pass-through securities of Ginnie Mae (GNMA), Fannie Mae (FNMA), and Freddie Mac (FHLMC).

Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index – a component of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index, which measures performance of non-investment grade, fixed rate debt. The index limits the maximum exposure to any one issuer to 2%.

Citigroup World Government Bond Non-Dollar Hedged Index – a market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to represent the currency-hedged performance of the international developed government bond markets, excluding the United States.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global – measures the performance of U.S.-dollar- denominated debt instruments issued by emerging market sovereign and quasi-sovereign entities: Brady bonds, loans, Eurobonds.

It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Notes to Performance Summary

The fund’s shares may trade at a discount or premium to net asset value. When fund shares trade at a premium, buyers pay more than the net asset value underlying fund shares, and shares purchased at a premium would receive less than the amount paid for them in the event of the fund’s liquidation.

The fund’s monthly distributions may include a return of capital to shareholders to the extent that distributions are in excess of the fund’s net investment income and net capital gains, determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations. Distributions that are treated for federal income tax purposes as a return of capital will reduce each shareholder’s basis in his or her shares and, to the extent the return of capital exceeds such basis, will be treated as gain to the shareholder from a sale of shares. Returns of shareholder capital have the effect of reducing the fund’s assets and increasing the fund’s expense ratio.

Net asset values and performance results based on net asset value per share do not include adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and may differ from amounts reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities or the Financial Highlights.

 

8


Table of Contents

Performance Summary – continued

 

From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower.

 

In accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the fund hereby gives notice that it may from time to time repurchase shares of the fund in the open market at the option of the Board of Trustees and on such terms as the Trustees shall determine.

 

9


Table of Contents

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS’ PROFILES

 

Portfolio Manager   Primary Role   Since   Title and Five Year History
Richard Hawkins   Lead Portfolio
Manager
  2004   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 1988.
William Adams   Lower Quality
Debt Instruments
Portfolio Manager
  2011   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 2009; Credit Analyst at MFS from 1997 to 2005.
Ward Brown   Emerging
Markets Debt
Instruments
Portfolio Manager
  2012   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 2005.
David Cole   Lower Quality
Debt Instruments
Portfolio Manager
  2006   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 2004.
Pilar Gomez-Bravo   Global Debt
Instruments
Portfolio Manager
  2013   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 2013; Managing Director of Imperial Capital from May 2012 to March 2013; Portfolio Manager and Head of Research of Negentropy Capital from June 2011 to April 2012; Co-founder of Marengo Asset Management from June 2010 to April 2011; Head of Credit Europe Neuberger Berman from June 2006 to May 2010.
Joshua Marston   Structured
Securities
Portfolio Manager
  2012   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 1999.
Robert Persons   Investment Grade
Debt Instruments
Portfolio Manager
  2013   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 2000.
Matthew Ryan   Emerging
Markets Debt
Instruments
Portfolio Manager
  2004   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 1997.
Erik Weisman   Sovereign Debt
Obligations
Portfolio Manager
  2012   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 2002.

 

10


Table of Contents

DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND CASH PURCHASE PLAN

The fund offers a Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) that allows common shareholders to reinvest either all of the distributions paid by the fund or only the long-term capital gains. Generally, purchases are made at the market price unless that price exceeds the net asset value (the shares are trading at a premium). If the shares are trading at a premium, purchases will be made at a price of either the net asset value or 95% of the market price, whichever is greater. You can also buy shares on a quarterly basis in any amount $100 and over. The Plan Agent will purchase shares under the Cash Purchase Plan on the 15th of January, April, July, and October or shortly thereafter.

If shares are registered in your own name, new shareholders will automatically participate in the Plan, unless you have indicated that you do not wish to participate. If your shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan, you may wish to request that your shares be re-registered in your own name so that you can participate. There is no service charge to reinvest distributions, nor are there brokerage charges for shares issued directly by the fund. However, when shares are bought on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise on the open market, each participant pays a pro rata share of the transaction expenses, including commissions. Dividends and capital gains distributions are taxable whether received in cash or reinvested in additional shares – the automatic reinvestment of distributions does not relieve you of any income tax that may be payable (or required to be withheld) on the distributions.

You may withdraw from the Plan at any time by going to the Plan Agent’s website at www.computershare.com, by calling 1-800-637-2304 any business day from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time or by writing to the Plan Agent at P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940 - 3078. Please have available the name of the fund and your account number. For certain types of registrations, such as corporate accounts, instructions must be submitted in writing. Please call for additional details. When you withdraw from the Plan, you can receive the value of the reinvested shares in one of three ways: your full shares will be held in your account, the Plan Agent will sell your shares and send the proceeds to you, or you may transfer your full shares to your investment professional who can hold or sell them. Additionally, the Plan Agent will sell your fractional shares and send the proceeds to you.

If you have any questions or for further information or a copy of the Plan, contact the Plan Agent Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (the Transfer Agent for the fund) at 1-800-637-2304, at the Plan Agent’s website at www.computershare.com, or by writing to the Plan Agent at P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940 - 3078.

 

11


Table of Contents

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

11/30/14

The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.

 

Bonds - 114.5%                 
Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Aerospace - 1.6%                 
Bombardier, Inc., 7.5%, 3/15/18 (n)    $ 1,040,000      $ 1,149,980   
Bombardier, Inc., 7.75%, 3/15/20 (n)      425,000        467,500   
Bombardier, Inc., 6.125%, 1/15/23 (n)      1,135,000        1,166,213   
CPI International, Inc., 8.75%, 2/15/18      1,295,000        1,333,850   
Gencorp, Inc., 7.125%, 3/15/21      1,555,000        1,638,581   
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 7.125%, 3/15/21      2,075,000        2,253,969   
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 5%, 12/15/21 (n)      145,000        147,356   
TransDigm, Inc., 6%, 7/15/22      100,000        101,000   
TransDigm, Inc., 6.5%, 7/15/24      360,000        367,200   
    

 

 

 
             $ 8,625,649   
Apparel Manufacturers - 0.4%                 
Hanesbrands, Inc., 6.375%, 12/15/20    $ 875,000      $ 931,438   
PVH Corp., 4.5%, 12/15/22      1,375,000        1,368,125   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,299,563   
Asset-Backed & Securitized - 3.9%                 
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., FRN, 5.947%, 2/10/51    $ 1,167,769      $ 1,282,963   
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.483%, 2/28/41 (d)(q)      85,940        87,544   
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.752%, 12/28/40 (z)      671,248        401,001   
Citigroup/Deutsche Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.366%, 12/11/49      1,605,000        1,678,336   
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, FRN, 5.973%, 6/10/46      230,000        244,396   
Countrywide Asset-Backed Certificates, FRN, 5.147%, 2/25/33      333,034        336,025   
Crest Ltd., CDO, 7%, 1/28/40 (a)(p)      2,733,062        44,002   
Dryden Senior Loan Fund, 2013-26A, “A”, CLO, FRN, 1.33%, 7/15/25 (z)      722,000        710,270   
First Union-Lehman Brothers Bank of America, FRN, 0.727%, 11/18/35 (i)      5,782,501        97,990   
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.989%, 8/10/45      1,587,039        1,732,623   
Greenwich Capital Commercial Funding Corp., 5.475%, 3/10/39      954,545        1,006,501   
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., “A3”, FRN, 5.974%, 6/15/49      1,000,000        1,016,347   

 

12


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Asset-Backed & Securitized - continued                 
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., “A3”, FRN, 6.124%, 2/15/51    $ 319,387      $ 319,989   
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., “A4”, FRN, 5.974%, 6/15/49      2,346,110        2,539,108   
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Trust, 2007-LD11, “AM”, FRN, 5.974%, 6/15/49      2,142,300        2,245,482   
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust, FRN, 6.027%, 6/12/50      1,350,000        1,479,007   
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust, “AM”, FRN, 5.867%, 4/15/49      2,137,000        2,233,238   
Multi Security Asset Trust, “A3”, CDO, 5%, 11/28/35 (n)      163,363        162,729   
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, “A4”, FRN, 6.139%, 2/15/51      3,615,166        3,883,252   
    

 

 

 
             $ 21,500,803   
Automotive - 2.6%                 
Accuride Corp., 9.5%, 8/01/18    $ 1,585,000      $ 1,648,400   
Allison Transmission, Inc., 7.125%, 5/15/19 (n)      2,345,000        2,462,250   
FCE Bank PLC, 1.875%, 5/12/16    EUR 100,000        126,881   
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 1.7%, 5/09/16    $ 550,000        554,285   
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 6.5%, 3/01/21      1,585,000        1,684,063   
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 7%, 5/15/22      350,000        378,875   
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc., 2.7%, 3/15/17 (n)      370,000        381,220   
Jaguar Land Rover PLC, 8.125%, 5/15/21 (n)      2,065,000        2,274,081   
Lear Corp., 8.125%, 3/15/20      833,000        874,650   
Lear Corp., 4.75%, 1/15/23      1,015,000        1,009,925   
Lear Corp., 5.375%, 3/15/24      60,000        60,750   
Lear Corp., 5.25%, 1/15/25      790,000        790,000   
Renault S.A., 3.625%, 9/19/18    EUR 250,000        338,584   
Schaeffler Finance B.V., 3.25%, 5/15/19    EUR 230,000        287,517   
Schaeffler Finance B.V., 4.75%, 5/15/21 (n)    $ 660,000        658,350   
Schaeffler Holding Finance B.V., 6.25%, 11/15/19 (p)(z)      470,000        491,738   
TRW Automotive, Inc., 4.5%, 3/01/21 (n)      99,000        99,495   
Volkswagen International Finance N.V., 3.875% to 9/04/18, FRN to 9/29/49    EUR 200,000        263,792   
    

 

 

 
             $ 14,384,856   
Biotechnology - 0.0%                 
Life Technologies Corp., 6%, 3/01/20    $ 200,000      $ 230,409   
Broadcasting - 1.7%                 
AMC Networks, Inc., 7.75%, 7/15/21    $ 863,000      $ 938,513   
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., 9%, 3/01/21      763,000        743,925   
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., “A”, 6.5%, 11/15/22      190,000        197,087   

 

13


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Broadcasting - continued                 
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., “B”, 6.5%, 11/15/22    $ 850,000      $ 886,125   
Discovery Communications, Inc., 4.875%, 4/01/43      200,000        200,794   
Liberty Media Corp., 8.5%, 7/15/29      820,000        904,050   
Liberty Media Corp., 8.25%, 2/01/30      210,000        231,525   
Netflix, Inc., 5.375%, 2/01/21      1,680,000        1,755,600   
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., 6.875%, 11/15/20      1,070,000        1,112,800   
Omnicom Group, Inc., 3.65%, 11/01/24      77,000        77,351   
ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG, 2.625%, 4/15/21    EUR 240,000        310,046   
Scripps Networks Interactive, 2.75%, 11/15/19    $ 107,000        108,065   
SES Global Americas Holdings GP, 2.5%, 3/25/19 (n)      181,000        181,501   
Univision Communications, Inc., 6.875%, 5/15/19 (n)      855,000        897,750   
Univision Communications, Inc., 7.875%, 11/01/20 (n)      720,000        776,700   
Vivendi S.A., 4%, 3/31/17    EUR 150,000        201,952   
    

 

 

 
             $ 9,523,784   
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.4%                 
E*TRADE Financial Corp., 6.375%, 11/15/19    $ 2,200,000      $ 2,354,000   
Building - 2.2%                 
Allegion U.S. Holding Co., Inc., 5.75%, 10/01/21    $ 1,800,000      $ 1,890,000   
Building Materials Corp. of America, 5.375%, 11/15/24 (n)      875,000        875,000   
Building Materials Holding Corp., 6.75%, 5/01/21 (n)      675,000        726,469   
CEMEX Finance LLC, 6%, 4/01/24 (n)      234,000        234,293   
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 6.5%, 12/10/19 (n)      284,000        296,070   
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 7.25%, 1/15/21 (n)      423,000        447,323   
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 5.7%, 1/11/25 (n)      200,000        193,000   
Cimpor Financial Operations B.V., 5.75%, 7/17/24 (n)      263,000        245,576   
CRH Finance Ltd., 3.125%, 4/03/23    EUR 150,000        209,671   
Elementia S.A. de C.V., 5.5%, 1/15/25 (z)    $ 210,000        210,840   
Gibraltar Industries, Inc., 6.25%, 2/01/21      300,000        308,250   
HD Supply, Inc., 8.125%, 4/15/19      690,000        749,685   
HD Supply, Inc., 7.5%, 7/15/20      980,000        1,033,900   
Headwaters, Inc., 7.25%, 1/15/19      390,000        406,575   
Headwaters, Inc., 7.625%, 4/01/19      255,000        267,113   
Holcim Finance Luxembourg S.A., 3%, 1/22/24    EUR 150,000        209,915   
Holcim GB Finance Ltd., 8.75%, 4/24/17    GBP 100,000        181,957   
Mohawk Industries, Inc., 3.85%, 2/01/23    $ 134,000        135,437   
Nortek, Inc., 8.5%, 4/15/21      1,120,000        1,204,000   
Owens Corning, Inc., 4.2%, 12/15/22      250,000        252,592   
Roofing Supply Group LLC/Roofing Supply Finance, Inc., 10%, 6/01/20 (n)      985,000        1,014,550   
Union Andina de Cementos S.A.A., 5.875%, 10/30/21 (n)      259,000        263,274   

 

14


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Building - continued                 
USG Corp., 7.875%, 3/30/20 (n)    $ 480,000      $ 519,000   
USG Corp., 5.875%, 11/01/21 (n)      235,000        242,057   
    

 

 

 
             $ 12,116,547   
Business Services - 0.8%                 
Equinix, Inc., 4.875%, 4/01/20    $ 565,000      $ 566,413   
Equinix, Inc., 5.375%, 1/01/22      305,000        306,525   
Equinix, Inc., 5.375%, 4/01/23      490,000        491,838   
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., 3.875%, 6/05/24      335,000        342,941   
Iron Mountain, Inc., 8.375%, 8/15/21      583,000        606,320   
Iron Mountain, Inc., 6%, 8/15/23      625,000        654,688   
NeuStar, Inc., 4.5%, 1/15/23      1,155,000        1,013,513   
Tencent Holdings Ltd., 3.375%, 3/05/18 (n)      449,000        463,577   
    

 

 

 
             $ 4,445,815   
Cable TV - 3.9%                 
CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp., 8.125%, 4/30/20    $ 1,055,000      $ 1,118,300   
CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp., 7.375%, 6/01/20      250,000        267,813   
CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp., 6.5%, 4/30/21      1,965,000        2,068,163   
CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp., 5.75%, 1/15/24      935,000        940,844   
Cequel Communications Holdings, 6.375%, 9/15/20 (n)      1,575,000        1,634,063   
Comcast Corp., 4.75%, 3/01/44      223,000        245,181   
DISH DBS Corp., 7.875%, 9/01/19      240,000        274,200   
DISH DBS Corp., 6.75%, 6/01/21      1,000,000        1,086,250   
DISH DBS Corp., 5%, 3/15/23      1,065,000        1,033,716   
DISH DBS Corp., 5.875%, 11/15/24 (n)      380,000        382,850   
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A., 6.625%, 12/15/22      1,145,000        1,193,663   
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A., 5.5%, 8/01/23      1,755,000        1,728,675   
Intelsat Luxembourg S.A., 8.125%, 6/01/23      695,000        726,275   
LGE Holdco VI B.V., 7.125%, 5/15/24 (z)    EUR 635,000        871,119   
Lynx I Corp., 5.375%, 4/15/21 (n)    $ 380,000        391,875   
Lynx II Corp., 6.375%, 4/15/23 (n)      555,000        591,075   
Numericable Group S.A., 6%, 5/15/22 (n)      1,490,000        1,513,497   
Shaw Communications, Inc., 5.65%, 10/01/19    CAD 215,000        213,231   
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 4.25%, 5/15/20 (n)    $ 90,000        89,325   
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 5.875%, 10/01/20 (n)      120,000        126,900   
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 5.75%, 8/01/21 (n)      185,000        193,325   
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 4.625%, 5/15/23 (n)      530,000        504,825   
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 6%, 7/15/24 (n)      1,065,000        1,099,613   
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 5.75%, 6/02/31    GBP 100,000        187,194   

 

15


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Cable TV - continued                 
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 5.25%, 7/15/42    GBP 100,000      $ 178,837   
Unitymedia Hessen, 5.5%, 1/15/23 (n)    $ 1,100,000        1,144,000   
Unitymedia KabelBW GmbH, 6.125%, 1/15/25 (z)      570,000        596,363   
UPCB Finance III Ltd., 6.625%, 7/01/20 (n)      844,000        884,090   
VTR Finance B.V., 6.875%, 1/15/24 (n)      207,000        217,868   
    

 

 

 
             $ 21,503,130   
Chemicals - 3.1%                 
Celanese U.S. Holdings LLC, 5.875%, 6/15/21    $ 1,044,000      $ 1,124,910   
Celanese U.S. Holdings LLC, 4.625%, 11/15/22      210,000        210,525   
CF Industries, Inc., 5.15%, 3/15/34      169,000        179,701   
Consolidated Energy Finance S.A., 6.75%, 10/15/19 (n)      380,000        380,950   
Dow Chemical Co., 8.55%, 5/15/19      200,000        251,987   
Flash Dutch 2 B.V./U.S. Coatings Acquisition, 7.375%, 5/01/21 (n)      1,080,000        1,166,400   
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp., 6.625%, 4/15/20      330,000        319,275   
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp./Hexion Nova Scotia Finance, 8.875%, 2/01/18      945,000        893,025   
Huntsman International LLC, 8.625%, 3/15/21      1,180,000        1,280,300   
Huntsman International LLC, 5.125%, 4/15/21    EUR 165,000        215,483   
INEOS Finance PLC, 8.375%, 2/15/19 (n)    $ 2,000,000        2,135,000   
INEOS Group Holdings S.A., 6.125%, 8/15/18 (n)      515,000        506,683   
INEOS Group Holdings S.A., 5.875%, 2/15/19 (n)      400,000        389,000   
Israel Chemicals Ltd., 4.5%, 12/02/24 (z)      2,460,000        2,487,675   
LYB International Finance B.V., 4%, 7/15/23      135,000        141,392   
NOVA Chemicals Corp., 5.25%, 8/01/23 (n)      250,000        261,875   
NOVA Chemicals Corp., 5%, 5/01/25 (n)      480,000        496,200   
Praxair, Inc., 1.625%, 12/01/25    EUR 100,000        124,126   
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A., 5.5%, 4/21/20 (n)    $ 257,000        281,462   
Solvay Finance S.A., FRN, 4.199%, 5/29/49    EUR 250,000        323,985   
Taminco Global Chemical Corp., 9.75%, 3/31/20 (n)    $ 1,300,000        1,425,125   
Tronox Finance LLC, 6.375%, 8/15/20      1,865,000        1,911,625   
W.R. Grace & Co., 5.125%, 10/01/21 (n)      520,000        539,500   
    

 

 

 
             $ 17,046,204   
Computer Software - 0.3%                 
Oracle Corp., 3.4%, 7/08/24    $ 251,000      $ 257,984   
Syniverse Holdings, Inc., 9.125%, 1/15/19      362,000        378,290   
VeriSign, Inc., 4.625%, 5/01/23      995,000        977,588   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,613,862   
Computer Software - Systems - 0.5%                 
Audatex North America, Inc., 6%, 6/15/21 (n)    $ 1,315,000      $ 1,364,313   
CDW LLC/CDW Finance Corp., 8.5%, 4/01/19      646,000        685,568   

 

16


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Computer Software - Systems - continued                 
CDW LLC/CDW Finance Corp., 6%, 8/15/22    $ 320,000      $ 334,800   
CDW LLC/CDW Finance Corp., 5.5%, 12/01/24      525,000        523,688   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,908,369   
Conglomerates - 2.0%                 
Alfa S.A.B de C.V., 6.875%, 3/25/44    $ 521,000      $ 579,613   
Amsted Industries Co., 5%, 3/15/22 (n)      2,030,000        1,999,550   
BC Mountain LLC, 7%, 2/01/21 (n)      1,160,000        1,049,800   
Dynacast International LLC, 9.25%, 7/15/19      890,000        952,300   
EnPro Industries, Inc., 5.875%, 9/15/22 (n)      805,000        827,138   
Entegris, Inc., 6%, 4/01/22 (n)      1,475,000        1,523,380   
KION Finance S.A., 6.75%, 2/15/20    EUR 250,000        338,916   
Metalloinvest Finance Ltd., 5.625%, 4/17/20 (n)    $ 619,000        524,603   
Renaissance Acquisition, 6.875%, 8/15/21 (n)      1,345,000        1,334,913   
Rexel S.A., 6.125%, 12/15/19 (n)      1,520,000        1,580,800   
Roper Industries, Inc., 1.85%, 11/15/17      200,000        201,870   
Siemens Financierings N.V., 5.25% to 9/14/16, FRN to 9/14/66    EUR 100,000        133,252   
Siemens Financierings N.V., 6.125% to 9/14/16, FRN to 9/14/66    GBP 75,000        123,878   
    

 

 

 
             $ 11,170,013   
Construction - 0.2%                 
Empresas ICA S.A.B. de C.V., 8.9%, 2/04/21    $ 450,000      $ 452,250   
Empresas ICA S.A.B. de C.V., 8.875%, 5/29/24 (n)      853,000        810,350   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,262,600   
Consumer Products - 0.6%                 
Elizabeth Arden, Inc., 7.375%, 3/15/21    $ 470,000      $ 439,450   
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 4%, 12/01/24      400,000        406,018   
Prestige Brands, Inc., 8.125%, 2/01/20      257,000        275,633   
Prestige Brands, Inc., 5.375%, 12/15/21 (n)      805,000        792,925   
Prosegur Compania de Seguridad S.A., 2.75%, 4/02/18    EUR 200,000        262,473   
Reckitt Benckiser Treasury Services PLC, 3.625%, 9/21/23 (n)    $ 250,000        262,319   
Spectrum Brands, Inc., 6.375%, 11/15/20      900,000        951,750   
    

 

 

 
             $ 3,390,568   
Consumer Services - 1.3%                 
ADT Corp., 6.25%, 10/15/21    $ 1,825,000      $ 1,911,688   
ADT Corp., 4.125%, 6/15/23      60,000        54,450   
Garda World Security Corp., 7.25%, 11/15/21 (n)      245,000        245,000   
Garda World Security Corp., 7.25%, 11/15/21 (n)      660,000        660,000   
Grupo Posadas S.A.B. de C.V., 7.875%, 11/30/17      505,000        489,850   
Monitronics International, Inc., 9.125%, 4/01/20      1,360,000        1,346,400   

 

17


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Consumer Services - continued                 
Multi-Color Corp., 6.125%, 12/01/22 (n)    $ 410,000      $ 417,175   
Service Corp. International, 7%, 6/15/17      1,220,000        1,326,750   
Service Corp. International, 5.375%, 5/15/24      545,000        561,350   
    

 

 

 
             $ 7,012,663   
Containers - 2.7%                 
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 9.125%, 10/15/20 (n)    $ 1,445,000      $ 1,549,763   
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 9.125%, 10/15/20 (n)      750,000        808,125   
Ball Corp., 5%, 3/15/22      375,000        388,125   
Ball Corp., 4%, 11/15/23      1,260,000        1,209,600   
Berry Plastics Group, Inc., 9.75%, 1/15/21      145,000        161,675   
Berry Plastics Group, Inc., 5.5%, 5/15/22      915,000        919,575   
Crown American LLC, 4.5%, 1/15/23      1,334,000        1,280,640   
Greif, Inc., 6.75%, 2/01/17      850,000        913,750   
Greif, Inc., 7.75%, 8/01/19      1,000,000        1,145,000   
Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 5%, 1/15/22 (n)      355,000        359,438   
Reynolds Group, 7.125%, 4/15/19      835,000        864,747   
Reynolds Group, 9.875%, 8/15/19      410,000        441,775   
Reynolds Group, 5.75%, 10/15/20      790,000        812,713   
Reynolds Group, 8.25%, 2/15/21      1,880,000        1,962,250   
Sealed Air Corp., 4.875%, 12/01/22 (n)      585,000        582,806   
Sealed Air Corp., 5.125%, 12/01/24 (n)      145,000        145,363   
Signode Industrial Group, 6.375%, 5/01/22 (n)      1,030,000        1,009,400   
    

 

 

 
             $ 14,554,745   
Defense Electronics - 0.3%                 
BAE Systems PLC, 4.125%, 6/08/22    GBP 150,000      $ 251,951   
Ducommun, Inc., 9.75%, 7/15/18    $ 1,164,000        1,260,030   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,511,981   
Electrical Equipment - 0.2%                 
Anixter, Inc., 5.125%, 10/01/21    $ 910,000      $ 921,375   
Electronics - 1.1%                 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 6.75%, 3/01/19    $ 1,145,000      $ 1,059,125   
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 7.5%, 8/15/22      305,000        272,975   
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 7%, 7/01/24      295,000        252,225   
Micron Technology, Inc., 5.875%, 2/15/22 (n)      675,000        713,813   
Nokia Corp., 5.375%, 5/15/19      500,000        538,750   
Nokia Corp., 6.625%, 5/15/39      190,000        207,100   
NXP B.V., 5.75%, 3/15/23 (n)      1,130,000        1,200,625   
Sensata Technologies B.V., 6.5%, 5/15/19 (n)      1,130,000        1,186,500   
Sensata Technologies B.V., 5.625%, 11/01/24 (z)      475,000        504,094   

 

18


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Electronics - continued                 
Tyco Electronics Group S.A., 2.375%, 12/17/18    $ 294,000      $ 298,696   
    

 

 

 
             $ 6,233,903   
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - 2.6%                 
Banco do Estado Rio Grande do Sul S.A., 7.375%, 2/02/22 (n)    $ 1,092,000      $ 1,149,330   
CNPC (HK) Overseas Capital Ltd., 4.5%, 4/28/21 (n)      547,000        587,081   
CNPC General Capital Ltd., 3.4%, 4/16/23 (n)      586,000        571,554   
Comision Federal de Electricidad , 4.875%, 1/15/24      234,000        248,625   
Corporacion Financiera de Desarrollo S.A., FRN, 5.25%, 7/15/29 (n)      819,000        846,027   
Ecopetrol S.A., 5.875%, 5/28/45      370,000        366,300   
Empresa Nacional del Petroleo, 4.375%, 10/30/24 (n)      200,000        196,136   
Gaz Capital S.A., 4.95%, 2/06/28      383,000        321,199   
KazAgro National Management Holding, 4.625%, 5/24/23 (n)      1,088,000        1,006,400   
Kazakhstan Temir Zholy Co., 6.95%, 7/10/42 (n)      1,167,000        1,259,193   
KazMunayGas National Co., 6%, 11/07/44 (z)      200,000        187,750   
Majapahit Holding B.V., 7.25%, 6/28/17 (n)      591,000        657,488   
Majapahit Holding B.V., 8%, 8/07/19 (n)      380,000        448,875   
Office Cherifien des Phosphates, 6.875%, 4/25/44 (n)      280,000        308,056   
Pemex Project Funding Master Trust, 5.75%, 3/01/18      642,000        706,200   
Pertamina PT, 5.25%, 5/23/21 (n)      256,000        271,360   
Pertamina PT, 4.875%, 5/03/22 (n)      547,000        563,410   
Pertamina PT, 6%, 5/03/42 (n)      318,000        323,565   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 8%, 5/03/19      1,101,000        1,318,117   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 4.875%, 1/24/22      774,000        824,310   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 4.25%, 1/15/25 (n)      21,000        21,242   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 5.5%, 6/27/44 (n)      112,000        115,360   
PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk, 5.125%, 5/16/24 (n)      200,000        208,250   
Sinopec Group Overseas Development (2012) Ltd., 3.9%, 5/17/22 (n)      279,000        287,303   
State Grid Overseas Investment (2014) Ltd., 4.125%, 5/07/24 (n)      1,570,000        1,659,339   
    

 

 

 
             $ 14,452,470   
Emerging Market Sovereign - 3.5%                 
Dominican Republic, 7.5%, 5/06/21 (n)    $ 548,000      $ 617,048   
Dominican Republic, 5.875%, 4/18/24 (n)      121,000        126,445   
Dominican Republic, 8.625%, 4/20/27      891,000        1,084,793   
Republic of Angola, 7%, 8/16/19      482,000        500,388   
Republic of Colombia, 8.125%, 5/21/24      1,025,000        1,370,938   
Republic of Croatia, 5.5%, 4/04/23 (n)      2,108,000        2,215,255   

 

19


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Emerging Market Sovereign - continued                 
Republic of Ecuador, 7.95%, 6/20/24 (n)    $ 523,000      $ 537,383   
Republic of El Salvador, 6.375%, 1/18/27 (n)      42,000        43,155   
Republic of Hungary, 5.375%, 2/21/23      872,000        948,509   
Republic of Indonesia, 11.625%, 3/04/19 (n)      848,000        1,140,560   
Republic of Indonesia, 7.875%, 4/15/19    IDR 15,259,000,000        1,261,581   
Republic of Indonesia, 2.875%, 7/08/21 (z)    EUR 175,000        224,557   
Republic of Indonesia, 3.375%, 4/15/23 (n)    $ 302,000        293,318   
Republic of Kazakhstan, 3.875%, 10/14/24 (n)      322,000        313,950   
Republic of Panama, 9.375%, 4/01/29      719,000        1,079,399   
Republic of Paraguay, 6.1%, 8/11/44 (n)      550,000        585,750   
Republic of Peru, 7.35%, 7/21/25      355,000        472,150   
Republic of Romania, 6.75%, 2/07/22 (n)      1,030,000        1,238,936   
Republic of Slovakia, 4.375%, 5/21/22 (n)      688,000        749,136   
Republic of Turkey, 5.625%, 3/30/21      362,000        401,820   
Republic of Turkey, 6.25%, 9/26/22      390,000        450,977   
Russian Federation, 4.875%, 9/16/23 (n)      800,000        762,488   
Russian Federation, 4.875%, 9/16/23      200,000        190,622   
United Mexican States, 3.625%, 3/15/22      1,130,000        1,167,290   
United Mexican States, 8.5%, 5/31/29    MXN 13,970,000        1,213,278   
    

 

 

 
             $ 18,989,726   
Energy - Independent - 5.0%                 
Afren PLC, 10.25%, 4/08/19 (n)    $ 463,000      $ 427,831   
American Energy-Permian Basin LLC, 7.125%, 11/01/20 (n)      300,000        243,000   
American Energy-Permian Basin LLC, 7.375%, 11/01/21 (n)      910,000        734,825   
Antero Resources Finance Corp., 6%, 12/01/20      735,000        746,944   
Antero Resources Finance Corp., 5.375%, 11/01/21      1,050,000        1,036,875   
Athlon Holdings LP/Athlon Finance Corp., 6%, 5/01/22 (n)      643,000        696,048   
Baytex Energy Corp., 5.125%, 6/01/21 (n)      360,000        331,200   
Baytex Energy Corp., 5.625%, 6/01/24 (n)      1,145,000        1,024,775   
BreitBurn Energy Partners LP, 8.625%, 10/15/20      330,000        321,750   
BreitBurn Energy Partners LP, 7.875%, 4/15/22      1,310,000        1,165,900   
Chaparral Energy, Inc., 7.625%, 11/15/22      1,260,000        1,152,900   
Cimarex Energy Co., 4.375%, 6/01/24      200,000        197,500   
Concho Resources, Inc., 6.5%, 1/15/22      825,000        851,813   
Concho Resources, Inc., 5.5%, 4/01/23      725,000        714,125   
Continental Resources, Inc., 4.9%, 6/01/44      200,000        183,447   
Continental Resources, Inc., 4.5%, 4/15/23      250,000        254,961   
Energy XXI Gulf Coast, Inc., 6.875%, 3/15/24 (z)      195,000        146,250   
EP Energy LLC, 6.875%, 5/01/19      300,000        312,750   
EP Energy LLC, 9.375%, 5/01/20      795,000        868,538   
EP Energy LLC, 7.75%, 9/01/22      2,360,000        2,407,200   
Halcon Resources Corp., 8.875%, 5/15/21      1,010,000        777,700   
Harvest Operations Corp., 6.875%, 10/01/17      377,000        375,115   

 

20


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Energy - Independent - continued                 
Hess Corp., 8.125%, 2/15/19    $ 100,000      $ 121,147   
Hilcorp Energy I/Hilcorp Finance Co., 8%, 2/15/20 (n)      400,000        416,000   
Hilcorp Energy I/Hilcorp Finance Co., 5%, 12/01/24 (n)      170,000        157,250   
Linn Energy LLC/Linn Energy Finance Corp., 8.625%, 4/15/20      530,000        479,650   
Linn Energy LLC/Linn Energy Finance Corp., 7.75%, 2/01/21      1,688,000        1,502,320   
Linn Energy LLC/Linn Energy Finance Corp., 6.5%, 9/15/21      510,000        441,150   
MEG Energy Corp., 6.5%, 3/15/21 (n)      1,495,000        1,375,400   
MEG Energy Corp., 7%, 3/31/24 (n)      900,000        816,750   
Northern Blizzard Resources, Inc., 7.25%, 2/01/22 (n)      738,000        682,650   
Nostrum Oil & Gas Finance B.V., 6.375%, 2/14/19 (n)      272,000        261,120   
Oasis Petroleum, Inc., 6.875%, 3/15/22      1,430,000        1,344,200   
Range Resources Corp., 5%, 8/15/22      180,000        185,850   
Rosetta Resources, Inc., 5.625%, 5/01/21      430,000        410,650   
RSP Permian, Inc., 6.625%, 10/01/22 (n)      495,000        481,388   
Sanchez Energy Corp., 6.125%, 1/15/23 (n)      1,345,000        1,210,500   
SandRidge Energy, Inc., 8.125%, 10/15/22      955,000        764,000   
SM Energy Co., 6.5%, 11/15/21      1,115,000        1,134,513   
SM Energy Co., 6.125%, 11/15/22 (n)      570,000        572,850   
    

 

 

 
             $ 27,328,835   
Energy - Integrated - 0.7%                 
BG Energy Capital PLC, FRN, 6.5%, 11/30/72    EUR 150,000      $ 208,576   
BP Capital Markets PLC, 2.521%, 1/15/20    $ 60,000        60,401   
Eni S.p.A., 4%, 6/29/20    EUR 150,000        217,616   
Inkia Energy Ltd., 8.375%, 4/04/21    $ 754,000        801,125   
Listrindo Capital B.V., 6.95%, 2/21/19 (n)      200,000        213,000   
LUKOIL International Finance B.V., 4.563%, 4/24/23 (n)      544,000        457,195   
LUKOIL International Finance B.V., 4.563%, 4/24/23      200,000        168,086   
Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., 7.25%, 12/12/21 (n)      1,107,000        1,159,583   
Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., 5.125%, 3/28/23 (n)      201,000        185,423   
Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., 5.625%, 1/19/25 (n)      173,000        159,593   
Repsol International Finance B.V., 3.625%, 10/07/21    EUR 200,000        284,115   
    

 

 

 
             $ 3,914,713   
Entertainment - 1.7%                 
Activision Blizzard, Inc., 6.125%, 9/15/23 (n)    $ 1,590,000      $ 1,729,125   
Carnival Corp., 1.2%, 2/05/16      370,000        370,201   
Cedar Fair LP, 5.25%, 3/15/21      1,215,000        1,221,075   
Cedar Fair LP, 5.375%, 6/01/24 (n)      405,000        403,988   
Cinemark USA, Inc., 5.125%, 12/15/22      1,280,000        1,254,400   
Cinemark USA, Inc., 4.875%, 6/01/23      780,000        742,950   
NCL Corp. Ltd., 5.25%, 11/15/19 (n)      810,000        816,075   
Seven Seas Cruises S. DE R.L., 9.125%, 5/15/19      1,235,000        1,338,370   

 

21


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Entertainment - continued                 
Six Flags Entertainment Corp., 5.25%, 1/15/21 (n)    $ 1,255,000      $ 1,258,138   
    

 

 

 
             $ 9,134,322   
Financial Institutions - 3.3%                 
AerCap Ireland Capital Ltd., 5%, 10/01/21 (n)    $ 520,000      $ 540,800   
Aircastle Ltd., 4.625%, 12/15/18      130,000        132,275   
Aircastle Ltd., 5.125%, 3/15/21      1,370,000        1,383,700   
Aviation Capital Group, 4.625%, 1/31/18 (n)      555,000        577,602   
Aviation Capital Group, 6.75%, 4/06/21 (n)      415,000        473,100   
CIT Group, Inc., 5.25%, 3/15/18      1,520,000        1,602,080   
CIT Group, Inc., 6.625%, 4/01/18 (n)      1,305,000        1,422,450   
CIT Group, Inc., 5.5%, 2/15/19 (n)      1,560,000        1,653,600   
CIT Group, Inc., 3.875%, 2/19/19      566,000        568,717   
CIT Group, Inc., 5%, 8/15/22      640,000        660,000   
General Electric Capital Corp., 3.1%, 1/09/23      750,000        760,000   
Icahn Enterprises LP, 6%, 8/01/20      700,000        728,840   
Icahn Enterprises LP, 5.875%, 2/01/22      1,410,000        1,438,200   
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 6.5%, 8/01/18      505,000        484,800   
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 7.875%, 10/01/20      2,050,000        1,973,125   
SLM Corp., 4.875%, 6/17/19      272,000        272,680   
SLM Corp., 8%, 3/25/20      1,135,000        1,281,131   
SLM Corp., 7.25%, 1/25/22      1,645,000        1,805,388   
SLM Corp., 6.125%, 3/25/24      445,000        445,000   
    

 

 

 
             $ 18,203,488   
Food & Beverages - 2.0%                 
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., 6.875%, 11/15/19    $ 300,000      $ 362,588   
B&G Foods, Inc., 4.625%, 6/01/21      860,000        827,750   
BRF S.A., 4.75%, 5/22/24 (n)      206,000        202,910   
BRF S.A., 4.75%, 5/22/24      1,408,000        1,386,880   
Coca-Cola HBC Finance B.V., 4.25%, 11/16/16    EUR 150,000        199,711   
Conagra Foods, Inc., 3.2%, 1/25/23    $ 181,000        177,758   
Constellation Brands, Inc., 3.75%, 5/01/21      355,000        353,225   
Constellation Brands, Inc., 4.25%, 5/01/23      1,400,000        1,394,820   
Darling Ingredients, Inc., 5.375%, 1/15/22      1,300,000        1,313,000   
Embotelladora Andina S.A., 5%, 10/01/23 (n)      236,000        248,559   
Gruma S.A.B. de C.V., 4.875%, 12/01/24 (z)      202,000        206,545   
H.J. Heinz Co., 4.25%, 10/15/20      1,085,000        1,098,671   
JBS Investments GmbH, 7.75%, 10/28/20 (n)      397,000        430,745   
Minerva Luxembourg S.A., 7.75%, 1/31/23 (n)      204,000        210,671   
Sun Merger Sub, Inc., 5.875%, 8/01/21 (n)      1,365,000        1,446,900   
Tyson Foods, Inc., 6.6%, 4/01/16      412,000        442,589   
Tyson Foods, Inc., 5.15%, 8/15/44      81,000        88,337   

 

22


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Food & Beverages - continued                 
Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co., 2.9%, 10/21/19 (n)    $ 107,000      $ 109,111   
Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co., 3.375%, 10/21/20 (n)      300,000        310,419   
    

 

 

 
             $ 10,811,189   
Food & Drug Stores - 0.1%                 
CVS Health Corp., 5.75%, 6/01/17    $ 155,000      $ 171,745   
Loblaw Cos. Ltd., 4.86%, 9/12/23    CAD 224,000        215,678   
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., 2.7%, 11/18/19    $ 293,000        296,327   
    

 

 

 
             $ 683,750   
Forest & Paper Products - 0.2%                 
Appvion, Inc., 9%, 6/01/20 (n)    $ 595,000      $ 434,350   
International Paper Co., 6%, 11/15/41      185,000        211,716   
Tembec Industries, Inc., 9%, 12/15/19 (n)      565,000        565,000   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,211,066   
Gaming & Lodging - 1.7%                 
CCM Merger, Inc., 9.125%, 5/01/19 (n)    $ 1,055,000      $ 1,134,125   
Chester Downs & Marina LLC, 9.25%, 2/01/20 (n)      315,000        274,838   
Greektown Holdings LLC, 8.875%, 3/15/19 (n)      1,025,000        1,042,938   
Hilton Worldwide Finance Co., 5.625%, 10/15/21 (n)      1,640,000        1,722,000   
Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., 8.875%, 6/15/20      300,000        317,250   
Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., 5.875%, 3/15/21      710,000        725,975   
MGM Resorts International, 6.625%, 12/15/21      745,000        795,288   
MGM Resorts International, 6%, 3/15/23      765,000        776,475   
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc., REIT, 5%, 4/15/21      1,315,000        1,305,138   
Wynn Las Vegas LLC, 7.75%, 8/15/20      1,165,000        1,240,725   
    

 

 

 
             $ 9,334,752   
Industrial - 0.8%                 
Dematic S.A., 7.75%, 12/15/20 (n)    $ 1,515,000      $ 1,602,113   
Howard Hughes Corp., 6.875%, 10/01/21 (n)      1,790,000        1,888,450   
SPL Logistics Escrow LLC, 8.875%, 8/01/20 (n)      670,000        718,575   
    

 

 

 
             $ 4,209,138   
Insurance - 0.3%                 
American International Group, Inc., 4.875% to 3/15/17, FRN to 3/15/67    EUR 250,000      $ 324,296   
Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A., 7.75% to 2022, FRN to 12/12/42    EUR 100,000        157,559   
Aviva PLC, 5.7% to 9/29/15, FRN to 9/29/49    EUR 150,000        191,516   
CNP Assurances S.A., 6% to 9/14/20, FRN to 9/14/40    EUR 200,000        287,122   
Delta Lloyd N.V., FRN, 9%, 8/29/42    EUR 150,000        241,705   

 

23


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Insurance - continued                 
Unum Group, 7.125%, 9/30/16    $ 500,000      $ 553,906   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,756,104   
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 0.3%                 
Amlin PLC, 6.5% to 12/19/16, FRN to 12/19/26    GBP 100,000      $ 162,284   
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., 4.5%, 2/11/43    $ 250,000        266,667   
Clerical Medical Finance PLC, 4.25% to 6/24/15, FRN to 6/29/49    EUR 200,000        249,651   
Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., 3.5%, 6/03/24    $ 159,000        161,093   
QBE Capital Funding III Ltd., 7.5% to 5/24/21, FRN to 5/24/41    GBP 200,000        353,409   
ZFS Finance USA Trust V, 6.5% to 5/09/17, FRN to 5/09/67 (n)    $ 627,000        672,458   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,865,562   
International Market Quasi-Sovereign - 0.6%                 
Caisse d’Amortissement de la Dette Sociale, 1%, 5/25/18    EUR 150,000      $ 192,188   
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.5%, 5/25/16    $ 250,000        262,000   
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.5%, 6/26/17      91,000        97,143   
Electricite de France S.A., 6% to 1/29/26, FRN to 12/29/49    GBP 100,000        166,762   
ESB Finance Ltd., 4.375%, 11/21/19    EUR 200,000        289,561   
Israel Electric Corp. Ltd., 5.625%, 6/21/18 (n)    $ 1,248,000        1,334,112   
Israel Electric Corp. Ltd., 6.875%, 6/21/23 (n)      921,000        1,061,959   
    

 

 

 
             $ 3,403,725   
International Market Sovereign - 10.7%                 
Commonwealth of Australia, 5.75%, 5/15/21    AUD 2,301,000      $ 2,304,753   
Federal Republic of Germany, 4.25%, 7/04/18    EUR 1,091,000        1,564,894   
Federal Republic of Germany, 3.25%, 7/04/21    EUR 441,000        656,601   
Federal Republic of Germany, 6.25%, 1/04/30    EUR 1,242,000        2,646,532   
Government of Canada, 3.25%, 6/01/21    CAD 187,000        180,768   
Government of Canada, 5.75%, 6/01/33    CAD 618,000        819,203   
Government of Japan, 1.1%, 6/20/20    JPY 760,250,000        6,750,190   
Government of Japan, 2.1%, 9/20/24    JPY 257,750,000        2,520,944   
Government of Japan, 2.2%, 9/20/27    JPY 392,000,000        3,932,889   
Government of Japan, 1.8%, 3/20/43    JPY 81,000,000        744,793   
Government of New Zealand, 5%, 3/15/19    NZD 725,000        597,814   
Government of New Zealand, 5.5%, 4/15/23    NZD 400,000        348,616   
Kingdom of Belgium, 5.5%, 9/28/17    EUR 1,836,000        2,637,266   
Kingdom of Belgium, 4.25%, 9/28/21    EUR 691,000        1,079,235   
Kingdom of Denmark, 3%, 11/15/21    DKK 2,538,000        501,259   
Kingdom of Spain, 5.4%, 1/31/23    EUR 987,000        1,584,292   
Kingdom of Spain, 5.5%, 7/30/17    EUR 240,000        337,209   
Kingdom of Spain, 4.6%, 7/30/19    EUR 2,130,000        3,099,021   

 

24


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
International Market Sovereign - continued                 
Kingdom of Sweden, 5%, 12/01/20    SEK 3,565,000      $ 605,411   
Kingdom of Sweden, 3.5%, 6/01/22    SEK 1,275,000        205,946   
Kingdom of the Netherlands, 3.5%, 7/15/20    EUR 573,000        842,064   
Kingdom of the Netherlands, 5.5%, 1/15/28    EUR 935,000        1,784,859   
Republic of Austria, 4.65%, 1/15/18    EUR 1,679,000        2,390,856   
Republic of Finland, 3.875%, 9/15/17    EUR 457,000        629,660   
Republic of France, 6%, 10/25/25    EUR 341,000        639,013   
Republic of France, 4.75%, 4/25/35    EUR 1,278,000        2,404,157   
Republic of Ireland, 4.5%, 4/18/20    EUR 222,000        333,559   
Republic of Ireland, 5.4%, 3/13/25    EUR 99,000        167,732   
Republic of Italy, 5.25%, 8/01/17    EUR 3,500,000        4,887,157   
Republic of Italy, 3.75%, 3/01/21    EUR 4,042,000        5,769,654   
United Kingdom Treasury, 8%, 6/07/21    GBP 1,260,000        2,766,366   
United Kingdom Treasury, 4.25%, 12/07/27    GBP 630,000        1,220,221   
United Kingdom Treasury, 4.25%, 3/07/36    GBP 515,000        1,029,330   
United Kingdom Treasury, 3.25%, 1/22/44    GBP 350,000        611,030   
    

 

 

 
             $ 58,593,294   
Machinery & Tools - 1.6%                 
Ashtead Capital, Inc., 5.625%, 10/01/24 (n)    $ 1,385,000      $ 1,461,175   
CNH America LLC, 7.25%, 1/15/16      710,000        743,725   
H&E Equipment Services Co., 7%, 9/01/22      1,505,000        1,599,063   
Jurassic Holdings III, Inc., 6.875%, 2/15/21 (n)      1,105,000        1,088,425   
Light Tower Rentals, Inc., 8.125%, 8/01/19 (n)      815,000        741,650   
Loxam SAS, 4.875%, 7/23/21 (z)    EUR 350,000        431,150   
RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., 8.25%, 2/01/21    $ 940,000        1,022,250   
United Rentals North America, Inc., 7.625%, 4/15/22      1,270,000        1,403,350   
    

 

 

 
             $ 8,490,788   
Major Banks - 2.3%                 
ABN AMRO North America Finance, Inc., 7.125%, 7/06/22    EUR 150,000      $ 245,556   
Bank of America Corp., 7.625%, 6/01/19    $ 370,000        450,287   
Bank of America Corp., 4.125%, 1/22/24      262,000        274,831   
Bank of America Corp., 4.875%, 4/01/44      104,000        112,927   
Bank of America Corp., FRN, 5.2%, 12/31/49      1,785,000        1,636,845   
Barclays Bank PLC, 6%, 1/14/21    EUR 150,000        227,480   
Barclays Bank PLC, 6.75% to 1/16/18, FRN to 1/16/23    GBP 100,000        171,136   
BBVA Senior Finance S.A., 3.25%, 3/21/16    EUR 200,000        257,794   
Credit Agricole S.A., 7.375%, 12/18/23    GBP 100,000        198,443   
Credit Agricole S.A., 7.875% to 10/26/19, FRN to 10/29/49    EUR 200,000        296,765   
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.75%, 1/24/22    $ 500,000        578,945   
HSBC USA, Inc., 4.875%, 8/24/20      460,000        511,394   
ING Bank N.V., 4.875%, 1/18/21    EUR 100,000        155,091   
ING Bank N.V., 3.50% to 11/21/18, FRN to 11/21/23    EUR 250,000        329,408   

 

25


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Major Banks - continued                 
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6.3%, 4/23/19    $ 500,000      $ 583,103   
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 3.25%, 9/23/22      478,000        483,793   
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6.75% to 2/01/24, FRN to 1/29/49      215,000        228,975   
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6% to 8/01/23, FRN to 12/29/49      1,995,000        2,009,963   
Morgan Stanley, 5.75%, 10/18/16      397,000        429,783   
Morgan Stanley, 6.625%, 4/01/18      391,000        449,701   
RBS Capital Trust II, 6.425% to 1/03/34, FRN to 12/29/49      530,000        553,850   
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 5.5%, 3/23/20    EUR 150,000        230,954   
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 7.648% to 9/30/31, FRN to 8/29/49    $ 1,140,000        1,333,800   
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 6.99% to 10/04/17, FRN to 10/29/49 (n)      350,000        397,250   
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, FRN, 3.625%, 3/25/24    EUR 250,000        315,236   
Societe Generale, 4.25%, 7/13/22    EUR 100,000        155,290   
Wells Fargo & Co., 5.9% to 6/15/24, FRN to 12/29/49    $ 253,000        260,274   
    

 

 

 
             $ 12,878,874   
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 3.5%                 
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., 5.125%, 8/01/21    $ 235,000      $ 241,463   
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., 6.875%, 2/01/22      1,685,000        1,783,994   
Davita, Inc., 6.625%, 11/01/20      986,000        1,032,835   
Davita, Inc., 5.125%, 7/15/24      755,000        774,347   
Fresenius Medical Care Capital Trust III, 5.625%, 7/31/19 (n)      495,000        532,125   
Fresenius Medical Care Capital Trust III, 5.875%, 1/31/22 (n)      335,000        362,638   
Fresenius US Finance II, Inc., 4.25%, 2/01/21 (n)      32,000        32,957   
HCA, Inc., 4.25%, 10/15/19      145,000        145,725   
HCA, Inc., 7.5%, 2/15/22      2,160,000        2,473,200   
HCA, Inc., 5.875%, 3/15/22      1,950,000        2,120,625   
HCA, Inc., 5%, 3/15/24      690,000        698,625   
HealthSouth Corp., 8.125%, 2/15/20      1,825,000        1,911,688   
LifePoint Hospitals, Inc., 5.5%, 12/01/21      1,950,000        2,023,125   
McKesson Corp., 7.5%, 2/15/19      110,000        132,615   
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 8%, 8/01/20      1,800,000        1,912,500   
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 4.5%, 4/01/21      1,235,000        1,213,388   
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 8.125%, 4/01/22      480,000        536,400   
Universal Health Services, Inc., 7.625%, 8/15/20      1,175,000        1,063,375   
    

 

 

 
             $ 18,991,625   
Medical Equipment - 0.5%                 
Biomet, Inc., 6.5%, 8/01/20    $ 564,000      $ 603,830   
Physio-Control International, Inc., 9.875%, 1/15/19 (n)      527,000        565,208   
Teleflex, Inc., 6.875%, 6/01/19      595,000        623,263   
Teleflex, Inc., 5.25%, 6/15/24 (n)      695,000        698,475   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,490,776   

 

26


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Metals & Mining - 3.3%                 
ArcelorMittal S.A., 6.75%, 2/25/22    $ 235,000      $ 255,416   
ArcelorMittal S.A., 7.25%, 3/01/41      375,000        376,875   
Arch Coal, Inc., 8%, 1/15/19 (n)      365,000        248,200   
Arch Coal, Inc., 7.25%, 10/01/20      240,000        104,400   
Barrick International (Barbados) Corp., 5.75%, 10/15/16 (n)      1,258,000        1,355,957   
Cameco Corp., 5.67%, 9/02/19    CAD 365,000        357,517   
Century Aluminum Co., 7.5%, 6/01/21 (n)    $ 1,345,000        1,425,700   
Commercial Metals Co., 4.875%, 5/15/23      860,000        834,200   
Consol Energy, Inc., 6.375%, 3/01/21      330,000        343,200   
Consol Energy, Inc., 5.875%, 4/15/22 (n)      1,225,000        1,221,938   
EVRAZ, Inc. N.A. Canada, 7.5%, 11/15/19 (n)      850,000        850,000   
First Quantum Minerals Ltd., 7.25%, 10/15/19 (n)      1,750,000        1,754,375   
First Quantum Minerals Ltd., 7.25%, 5/15/22 (n)      597,000        576,105   
Fortescue Metals Group Ltd., 8.25%, 11/01/19 (n)      1,480,000        1,369,000   
Glencore Finance (Europe) S.A., 6.5%, 2/27/19    GBP 50,000        90,152   
GrafTech International Co., 6.375%, 11/15/20    $ 1,125,000        1,046,250   
Lundin Mining Corp., 7.5%, 11/01/20 (n)      455,000        469,788   
Lundin Mining Corp., 7.875%, 11/01/22 (n)      455,000        469,788   
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 6.875%, 2/15/23      296,000        333,977   
Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Ltd., 3.75%, 9/20/21      108,000        112,177   
Southern Copper Corp., 5.25%, 11/08/42      250,000        230,688   
Steel Dynamics, Inc., 5.125%, 10/01/21 (n)      430,000        446,125   
Steel Dynamics, Inc., 5.25%, 4/15/23      745,000        772,938   
Steel Dynamics, Inc., 5.5%, 10/01/24 (n)      430,000        451,500   
Suncoke Energy Partners LP/Suncoke Energy Partners Finance Corp., 7.375%, 2/01/20 (n)      380,000        398,924   
Suncoke Energy, Inc., 7.625%, 8/01/19      685,000        712,400   
TMS International Corp., 7.625%, 10/15/21 (n)      550,000        576,125   
Walter Energy, Inc., 9.5%, 10/15/19 (n)      625,000        531,250   
Walter Energy, Inc., 8.5%, 4/15/21      380,000        95,000   
Xstrata Finance (Canada) Ltd., 5.25%, 6/13/17    EUR 200,000        276,350   
    

 

 

 
             $ 18,086,315   
Midstream - 4.4%                 
Access Midstream Partners LP, 4.875%, 5/15/23    $ 1,220,000      $ 1,244,400   
Access Midstream Partners LP, 4.875%, 3/15/24      100,000        102,000   
AmeriGas Finance LLC, 6.75%, 5/20/20      1,710,000        1,795,500   
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP/Atlas Pipeline, 4.75%, 11/15/21      310,000        303,800   
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP/Atlas Pipeline, 5.875%, 8/01/23      1,285,000        1,323,550   
Blue Racer Midstream LLC/Blue Racer Finance Corp., 6.125%, 11/15/22 (n)      385,000        388,850   
Crestwood Midstream Partners LP, 6%, 12/15/20      1,225,000        1,218,875   
Crestwood Midstream Partners LP, 6.125%, 3/01/22      505,000        502,475   

 

27


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Midstream - continued                 
El Paso Corp., 7.75%, 1/15/32    $ 2,311,000      $ 2,921,104   
Enbridge, Inc., 3.19%, 12/05/22    CAD 255,000        226,638   
Energy Transfer Equity LP, 7.5%, 10/15/20    $ 1,380,000        1,583,550   
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 3.6%, 2/01/23      300,000        293,057   
Enterprise Products Operating LLC, 4.85%, 3/15/44      74,000        77,311   
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 6.3%, 9/15/17      180,000        203,437   
Ferrellgas LP/Ferrellgas Finance Corp., 6.5%, 5/01/21      1,065,000        1,054,350   
Ferrellgas LP/Ferrellgas Finance Corp., 6.75%, 1/15/22      1,250,000        1,243,750   
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 5.3%, 9/15/20      370,000        406,984   
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 5.4%, 9/01/44      140,000        139,607   
MarkWest Energy Partners LP/MarkWest Energy Finance Corp., 5.5%, 2/15/23      665,000        681,625   
MarkWest Energy Partners LP/MarkWest Energy Finance Corp., 4.5%, 7/15/23      1,000,000        975,000   
MarkWest Energy Partners LP/MarkWest Energy Finance Corp., 4.875%, 12/01/24      300,000        295,500   
ONEOK, Inc., 4.25%, 2/01/22      200,000        197,756   
Plains All American Pipeline LP, 3.95%, 9/15/15      370,000        379,056   
Sabine Pass Liquefaction LLC, 5.625%, 2/01/21      945,000        966,263   
Sabine Pass Liquefaction LLC, 5.625%, 4/15/23      1,755,000        1,790,100   
Sabine Pass Liquefaction LLC, 5.75%, 5/15/24      575,000        581,469   
Spectra Energy Capital LLC, 8%, 10/01/19      250,000        310,460   
Summit Midstream Holdings LLC/Summit Midstream Finance Corp., 7.5%, 7/01/21      530,000        572,400   
Summit Midstream Holdings LLC/Summit Midstream Finance Corp., 5.5%, 8/15/22      1,200,000        1,188,000   
Sunoco Logistics Partners LP, 5.3%, 4/01/44      158,000        161,800   
Sunoco Logistics Partners LP, 5.35%, 5/15/45      126,000        129,850   
Targa Resources Partners LP/Targa Resources Finance Corp., 4.125%, 11/15/19 (n)      750,000        750,000   
    

 

 

 
             $ 24,008,517   
Mortgage-Backed - 2.8%                 
Fannie Mae, 4.56%, 3/01/15    $ 161,735      $ 162,889   
Fannie Mae, 4.89%, 3/01/15      88,831        89,096   
Fannie Mae, 4.74%, 4/01/15      312,875        314,794   
Fannie Mae, 4.878%, 4/01/15      321,107        320,724   
Fannie Mae, 4.815%, 6/01/15      335,890        339,349   
Fannie Mae, 4.78%, 8/01/15      362,437        368,181   
Fannie Mae, 6%, 7/01/16 - 7/01/37      721,367        805,726   
Fannie Mae, 5.5%, 9/01/19 - 8/01/37      3,039,712        3,394,469   
Fannie Mae, 4.88%, 3/01/20      162,840        177,858   
Fannie Mae, 6.5%, 4/01/32 - 1/01/33      233,826        271,500   

 

28


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Mortgage-Backed - continued                 
Fannie Mae, 5%, 10/01/35    $ 558,116      $ 620,298   
Fannie Mae, FRN, 0.417%, 5/25/18      6,340,606        6,339,300   
Freddie Mac, 6%, 8/01/34      108,850        124,736   
Ginnie Mae, 3%, 2/15/43      356,992        367,301   
Ginnie Mae, 5.5%, 1/20/39      469,833        534,234   
Ginnie Mae, 4.5%, 1/20/41      974,631        1,071,875   
    

 

 

 
             $ 15,302,330   
Natural Gas - Distribution - 0.1%                 
Centrica PLC, 4.375%, 3/13/29    GBP 125,000      $ 210,535   
GNL Quintero S.A., 4.634%, 7/31/29 (n)    $ 216,000        221,647   
    

 

 

 
             $ 432,182   
Network & Telecom - 2.3%                 
British Telecom PLC, 1.125%, 6/10/19    EUR 180,000      $ 227,166   
British Telecom PLC, 5.75%, 12/07/28    GBP 150,000        282,623   
Centurylink, Inc., 6.45%, 6/15/21    $ 670,000        730,300   
Centurylink, Inc., 6.75%, 12/01/23      245,000        271,950   
Centurylink, Inc., 7.65%, 3/15/42      960,000        960,000   
Citizens Communications Co., 9%, 8/15/31      1,545,000        1,664,738   
Columbus International, Inc., 7.375%, 3/30/21 (n)      200,000        213,000   
Deutsche Telekom International Finance B.V., 4.875%, 4/22/25    EUR 150,000        242,745   
Empresa Nacional de Telecomunicaciones S.A., 4.875%, 10/30/24 (n)    $ 483,000        489,431   
Empresa Nacional de Telecomunicaciones S.A., 4.75%, 8/01/26 (n)      2,268,000        2,264,442   
Frontier Communications Corp., 8.125%, 10/01/18      470,000        528,750   
Telecom Italia Capital, 6%, 9/30/34      305,000        305,763   
Telecom Italia Finance S.A., 7.75%, 1/24/33    EUR 85,000        138,472   
Telecom Italia S.p.A., 5.375%, 1/29/19    EUR 200,000        276,470   
Telecom Italia S.p.A., 5.303%, 5/30/24 (n)    $ 1,000,000        1,020,000   
Telefonica Celular del Paraguay S.A., 6.75%, 12/13/22      517,000        548,989   
TW Telecom Holdings, Inc., 5.375%, 10/01/22      513,000        580,973   
TW Telecom Holdings, Inc., 5.375%, 10/01/22      189,000        214,043   
Verizon Communications, Inc., 4.5%, 9/15/20      378,000        413,735   
Verizon Communications, Inc., 5.15%, 9/15/23      250,000        281,054   
Verizon Communications, Inc., 2.625%, 12/01/31    EUR 225,000        278,835   
Verizon Communications, Inc., 6.4%, 9/15/33    $ 300,000        371,355   
Windstream Corp., 7.75%, 10/15/20      345,000        362,078   
    

 

 

 
             $ 12,666,912   

 

29


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Oil Services - 1.4%                 
Bristow Group, Inc., 6.25%, 10/15/22    $ 1,538,000      $ 1,553,380   
Odebrecht Offshore Drilling Finance Ltd., 6.75%, 10/01/22 (n)      1,015,691        1,000,455   
Offshore Drilling Holding S.A., 8.625%, 9/20/20      750,000        755,625   
Pacific Drilling S.A., 5.375%, 6/01/20 (n)      1,290,000        1,019,100   
QGOG Constellation S.A., 6.25%, 11/09/19 (n)      1,390,000        1,146,750   
Shale-Inland Holdings LLC/Finance Co., 8.75%, 11/15/19 (n)      865,000        890,950   
Unit Corp., 6.625%, 5/15/21      1,390,000        1,334,400   
    

 

 

 
             $ 7,700,660   
Oils - 0.2%                 
CITGO Petroleum Corp., 6.25%, 8/15/22 (n)    $ 1,100,000      $ 1,127,500   
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 2.1%                 
Banco de Credito del Peru, 6.125% to 4/24/22, FRN to 4/24/27 (n)    $ 1,036,000      $ 1,113,907   
Banco Inbursa S.A. Institucion de Banca Multiple Grupo Financiero Inbursa, 4.125%, 6/06/24 (n)      310,000        303,645   
Bankia S.A., 3.5%, 1/17/19    EUR 200,000        269,209   
Banque Federative du Credit Mutuel, 2%, 9/19/19    EUR 100,000        132,208   
BB&T Corp., 3.95%, 4/29/16    $ 250,000        260,973   
BBVA Bancomer S.A. de C.V., 6.5%, 3/10/21 (n)      900,000        994,500   
BBVA Bancomer S.A. de C.V., 6.75%, 9/30/22 (n)      1,004,000        1,126,990   
CaixaBank S.A., 3.25%, 1/22/16    EUR 100,000        128,347   
CaixaBank S.A., 5% to 9/04/18, FRN to 11/14/23    EUR 200,000        268,521   
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A., 3.375%, 2/15/23    $ 384,000        380,894   
Corpbanca, 3.875%, 9/22/19 (n)      1,189,000        1,204,905   
Discover Bank, 7%, 4/15/20      250,000        298,375   
Discover Bank, 4.25%, 3/13/26      148,000        153,453   
Groupe BPCE S.A., 12.5% to 9/30/19, FRN to 8/29/49 (n)      1,513,000        2,056,742   
Halyk Savings Bank of Kazakhstan B.V., 7.25%, 1/28/21      516,000        544,803   
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., 4.125%, 9/19/16    EUR 100,000        132,199   
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., 5.25%, 1/28/22    GBP 100,000        176,003   
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., 5.017%, 6/26/24 (n)    $ 276,000        275,021   
KBC Internationale Financieringsmaatschappij N.V., 4.5%, 3/27/17    EUR 150,000        204,115   
LBG Capital No. 2 PLC, 6.385%, 5/12/20    EUR 250,000        333,628   
Macquarie Group Ltd., 3%, 12/03/18 (n)    $ 400,000        412,781   
Rabobank Nederland N.V., 4%, 9/19/22    GBP 100,000        171,222   
Yapi ve Kredi Bankasi A.S., 5.125%, 10/22/19 (n)    $ 580,000        603,200   
    

 

 

 
             $ 11,545,641   

 

30


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Pharmaceuticals - 1.8%                 
AbbVie, Inc., 1.75%, 11/06/17    $ 300,000      $ 301,603   
Bayer AG, 3% to 7/01/20, FRN to 7/01/75    EUR 175,000        224,285   
Bayer U.S. Finance LLC, 3.375%, 10/08/24 (n)    $ 200,000        202,360   
Celgene Corp., 1.9%, 8/15/17      400,000        404,325   
Endo Finance LLC/Endo Finco, Inc., 7.25%, 1/15/22 (n)      1,600,000        1,712,000   
Forest Laboratories, Inc., 4.375%, 2/01/19 (n)      496,000        527,640   
Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2.35%, 2/01/20      52,000        52,627   
Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3.7%, 4/01/24      268,000        279,692   
Gilead Sciences, Inc., 4.5%, 2/01/45      195,000        204,206   
Hospira, Inc., 6.05%, 3/30/17      200,000        218,199   
Mallinckrodt International Finance S.A., 5.75%, 8/01/22 (n)      1,040,000        1,063,400   
Mylan, Inc., 2.55%, 3/28/19      265,000        265,302   
Perrigo Finance PLC, 3.5%, 12/15/21      281,000        282,990   
Teva Pharmaceutical Finance B.V., 2.95%, 12/18/22      162,000        158,260   
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 7%, 10/01/20 (n)      1,415,000        1,485,750   
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 7.25%, 7/15/22 (n)      1,580,000        1,674,800   
Vantage Point Imaging, 7.5%, 7/15/21 (n)      525,000        567,000   
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1.875%, 10/01/17      200,000        199,301   
    

 

 

 
             $ 9,823,740   
Precious Metals & Minerals - 0.5%                 
Aurico Gold, Inc., 7.75%, 4/01/20 (n)    $ 1,185,000      $ 1,125,750   
Eldorado Gold Corp., 6.125%, 12/15/20 (n)      1,800,000        1,782,000   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,907,750   
Printing & Publishing - 0.7%                 
American Media, Inc., 13.5%, 6/15/18 (z)    $ 11,911      $ 12,730   
Gannett Co., Inc., 5.125%, 10/15/19      320,000        332,400   
Gannett Co., Inc., 5.125%, 7/15/20      60,000        61,950   
Gannett Co., Inc., 4.875%, 9/15/21 (n)      260,000        261,300   
Gannett Co., Inc., 6.375%, 10/15/23      1,385,000        1,490,606   
Lamar Media Corp., 5%, 5/01/23      580,000        577,100   
Moody’s Corp., 4.875%, 2/15/24      200,000        218,765   
Nielsen Finance LLC, 5%, 4/15/22 (n)      905,000        911,788   
    

 

 

 
             $ 3,866,639   
Railroad & Shipping - 0.2%                 
CSX Corp., 4.1%, 3/15/44    $ 200,000      $ 193,084   
Watco Cos. LLC, 6.375%, 4/01/23 (n)      870,000        885,225   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,078,309   
Real Estate - Apartment - 0.1%                 
Deutsche Annington Immobilien SE, 2.125%, 7/09/22    EUR 225,000      $ 292,830   

 

31


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Real Estate - Healthcare - 0.6%                 
Aviv Healthcare Properties LP/Aviv Healthcare, REIT, 6%, 10/15/21    $ 1,360,000      $ 1,448,400   
MPT Operating Partnership LP, REIT, 6.875%, 5/01/21      680,000        727,600   
MPT Operating Partnership LP, REIT, 6.375%, 2/15/22      1,040,000        1,112,800   
    

 

 

 
             $ 3,288,800   
Real Estate - Office - 0.0%                 
Boston Properties, Inc., REIT, 3.125%, 9/01/23    $ 250,000      $ 245,157   
Real Estate - Other - 0.9%                 
CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc., REIT, 7.25%, 4/15/19    $ 640,000      $ 651,200   
DuPont Fabros Technology LP, REIT, 5.875%, 9/15/21      1,225,000        1,270,938   
EPR Properties, REIT, 7.75%, 7/15/20      665,000        804,635   
EPR Properties, REIT, 5.75%, 8/15/22      750,000        828,119   
Felcor Lodging LP, REIT, 5.625%, 3/01/23      1,430,000        1,426,425   
    

 

 

 
             $ 4,981,317   
Real Estate - Retail - 0.2%                 
Hammerson PLC, REIT, 2.75%, 9/26/19    EUR 100,000      $ 134,892   
Hammerson PLC, REIT, 6%, 2/23/26    GBP 125,000        243,439   
Simon Property Group, Inc., REIT, 10.35%, 4/01/19    $ 360,000        476,294   
    

 

 

 
             $ 854,625   
Restaurants - 0.1%                 
YUM! Brands, Inc., 5.35%, 11/01/43    $ 250,000      $ 272,478   
Retailers - 1.4%                 
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., 5.165%, 8/01/44    $ 145,000      $ 147,549   
Best Buy Co., Inc., 5.5%, 3/15/21      1,485,000        1,522,125   
Bon Ton Stores, Inc., 8%, 6/15/21      505,000        414,100   
Cencosud S.A., 5.5%, 1/20/21      250,000        265,674   
Dollar General Corp., 4.125%, 7/15/17      400,000        415,816   
Gap, Inc., 5.95%, 4/12/21      300,000        341,857   
Home Depot, Inc., 4.875%, 2/15/44      200,000        230,126   
Jo-Ann Stores Holdings, Inc., 9.75%, 10/15/19 (n)(p)      860,000        782,600   
Limited Brands, Inc., 6.95%, 3/01/33      670,000        690,100   
Marks & Spencer Group PLC, 4.75%, 6/12/25    GBP 100,000        169,608   
Neiman Marcus Group Ltd., 8%, 10/15/21 (n)    $ 350,000        372,750   
Rite Aid Corp., 9.25%, 3/15/20      725,000        799,313   
S.A.C.I. Falabella, 4.375%, 1/27/25 (n)      255,000        251,672   
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., 6.875%, 11/15/19      775,000        825,375   
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 4.3%, 4/22/44      300,000        321,285   
    

 

 

 
             $ 7,549,950   

 

32


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Specialty Chemicals - 0.3%                 
Chemtura Corp., 5.75%, 7/15/21    $ 1,295,000      $ 1,282,050   
Mexichem S.A.B. de C.V., 5.875%, 9/17/44 (n)      238,000        233,240   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,515,290   
Specialty Stores - 0.6%                 
Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 5%, 6/01/22 (n)    $ 1,400,000      $ 1,382,500   
Men’s Wearhouse, Inc., 7%, 7/01/22 (n)      315,000        323,663   
Michaels Stores, Inc., 5.875%, 12/15/20 (n)      655,000        661,550   
Office Depot de Mexico S.A. de C.V., 6.875%, 9/20/20 (n)      769,000        811,295   
    

 

 

 
             $ 3,179,008   
Supermarkets - 0.1%                 
Delhaize Group, 3.125%, 2/27/20    EUR 100,000      $ 136,465   
William Morrison Supermarkets PLC, 3.5%, 7/27/26    GBP 100,000        143,495   
    

 

 

 
             $ 279,960   
Supranational - 1.5%                 
European Investment Bank, 1.75%, 3/15/17    $ 8,000,000      $ 8,189,904   
European Investment Bank, 4.25%, 4/15/19    EUR 200,000        293,228   
    

 

 

 
             $ 8,483,132   
Telecommunications - Wireless - 4.3%                 
Altice Financing S.A., 6.5%, 1/15/22 (n)    $ 2,005,000      $ 2,025,050   
America Movil S.A.B. de C.V., 1%, 6/04/18    EUR 100,000        126,050   
America Movil S.A.B. de C.V., 4.75%, 6/28/22    EUR 200,000        310,336   
American Tower Corp., REIT, 3.5%, 1/31/23    $ 465,000        451,339   
Bharti Airtel International (Netherlands) B.V., 3.375%, 5/20/21 (n)    EUR 100,000        131,857   
Bharti Airtel International B.V., 5.35%, 5/20/24 (n)    $ 1,324,000        1,443,253   
Crown Castle International Corp., 4.875%, 4/15/22      385,000        385,000   
Crown Castle International Corp., 5.25%, 1/15/23      1,200,000        1,221,000   
Digicel Group Ltd., 8.25%, 9/01/17 (n)      710,000        725,088   
Digicel Group Ltd., 8.25%, 9/30/20 (n)      1,053,000        1,079,325   
Digicel Group Ltd., 6%, 4/15/21 (n)      940,000        921,200   
Digicel Group Ltd., 7.125%, 4/01/22 (n)      425,000        415,438   
Eileme 2 AB, 11.625%, 1/31/20 (n)      765,000        870,188   
Millicom International Cellular S.A., 4.75%, 5/22/20 (n)      390,000        378,300   
Millicom International Cellular S.A., 6.625%, 10/15/21 (n)      409,000        432,006   
MTS International Funding Ltd., 5%, 5/30/23 (n)      488,000        407,480   
Rogers Communications, Inc., 5%, 3/15/44      137,000        144,084   
SBA Tower Trust, 2.898%, 10/15/19 (n)      220,000        221,936   
Sprint Capital Corp., 6.875%, 11/15/28      1,625,000        1,523,438   
Sprint Corp., 7.875%, 9/15/23      955,000        1,000,363   
Sprint Corp., 7.125%, 6/15/24      1,235,000        1,221,106   

 

33


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
Telecommunications - Wireless - continued                 
Sprint Nextel Corp., 9%, 11/15/18 (n)    $ 630,000      $ 729,225   
Sprint Nextel Corp., 6%, 11/15/22      830,000        798,875   
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 6.125%, 1/15/22      135,000        137,363   
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 6.5%, 1/15/24      370,000        378,325   
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 6.464%, 4/28/19      235,000        243,813   
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 6.25%, 4/01/21      2,590,000        2,654,750   
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 6.633%, 4/28/21      515,000        530,450   
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 4%, 7/15/20 (n)    EUR 200,000        248,730   
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 4.75%, 7/15/20 (n)    $ 1,070,000        1,029,875   
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 7.375%, 4/23/21 (n)      1,350,000        1,299,375   
    

 

 

 
             $ 23,484,618   
Telephone Services - 0.7%                 
B Communications Ltd., 7.375%, 2/15/21 (n)    $ 1,821,000      $ 1,954,844   
Cogent Communications Group, Inc., 8.375%, 2/15/18 (n)      445,000        467,250   
Frontier Communications Corp., 6.25%, 9/15/21      315,000        321,710   
Level 3 Financing, Inc., 8.625%, 7/15/20      630,000        685,125   
TELUS Corp., 5.05%, 7/23/20    CAD 370,000        363,088   
    

 

 

 
             $ 3,792,017   
Tobacco - 0.2%                 
Altria Group, Inc., 2.85%, 8/09/22    $ 250,000      $ 243,014   
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 8.125%, 6/23/19      92,000        112,829   
Philip Morris International, Inc., 4.875%, 11/15/43      174,000        188,995   
Reynolds American, Inc., 6.75%, 6/15/17      400,000        449,640   
    

 

 

 
             $ 994,478   
Transportation - 0.0%                 
Far Eastern Shipping Co., 8%, 5/02/18 (n)    $ 526,000      $ 239,330   
Transportation - Services - 1.4%                 
Aguila American Resources Ltd., 7.875%, 1/31/18 (n)    $ 860,000      $ 842,800   
ERAC USA Finance Co., 6.375%, 10/15/17 (n)      400,000        453,150   
ERAC USA Finance Co., 7%, 10/15/37 (n)      250,000        335,756   
HIT Finance B.V., 4.875%, 10/27/21    EUR 150,000        230,878   
Jack Cooper Holdings Corp., 9.25%, 6/01/20 (n)    $ 1,140,000        1,208,400   
Navios Logistics Finance (U.S.), Inc., 7.25%, 5/01/22 (n)      137,000        140,425   
Navios Maritime Acquisition Corp., 8.125%, 11/15/21 (n)      1,029,000        1,049,580   
Navios Maritime Holding, Inc., 7.375%, 1/15/22 (n)      1,205,000        1,162,825   
Stena AB, 7%, 2/01/24 (n)      1,570,000        1,538,600   
Syncreon Group BV/Syncre, 8.625%, 11/01/21 (n)      670,000        651,575   
Topaz Marine S.A., 8.625%, 11/01/18 (n)      208,000        203,840   
    

 

 

 
             $ 7,817,829   

 

34


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Bonds - continued                 
U.S. Government Agencies and Equivalents - 3.3%           
Fannie Mae, 1.125%, 4/27/17    $ 8,000,000      $ 8,070,840   
Freddie Mac, 0.875%, 2/22/17      10,000,000        10,035,520   
    

 

 

 
             $ 18,106,360   
U.S. Treasury Obligations - 5.6%                 
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 6.25%, 8/15/23 (f)    $ 1,400,000      $ 1,868,891   
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 5.375%, 2/15/31      286,200        394,151   
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 4.5%, 2/15/36      95,000        123,314   
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 4.75%, 2/15/37      2,986,200        4,008,275   
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 3.125%, 2/15/43      7,420,000        7,722,595   
U.S. Treasury Notes, 2.75%, 2/15/24 (f)      10,000,000        10,505,470   
U.S. Treasury Notes, 2.5%, 5/15/24      6,000,000        6,169,218   
    

 

 

 
             $ 30,791,914   
Utilities - Electric Power - 2.2%                 
AES Corp., 7.375%, 7/01/21    $ 725,000      $ 830,129   
American Electric Power Co., Inc., 1.65%, 12/15/17      185,000        185,917   
Calpine Corp., 5.375%, 1/15/23      200,000        202,750   
CMS Energy Corp., 3.875%, 3/01/24      250,000        260,679   
Covanta Holding Corp., 7.25%, 12/01/20      1,830,000        1,944,375   
Covanta Holding Corp., 6.375%, 10/01/22      310,000        329,375   
Dominion Resources, Inc., 2.5%, 12/01/19      250,000        252,091   
Duke Energy Corp., 1.625%, 8/15/17      185,000        186,307   
E-CL S.A., 4.5%, 1/29/25 (n)      397,000        403,222   
E.CL S.A., 5.625%, 1/15/21      757,000        827,027   
E.ON International Finance B.V., 6.375%, 6/07/32    GBP 50,000        102,402   
EDP Finance B.V., 5.25%, 1/14/21 (n)    $ 200,000        210,616   
EDP Finance B.V., 4.125%, 1/20/21    EUR 150,000        205,589   
Empresa Electrica Angamos S.A., 4.875%, 5/25/29 (z)    $ 319,000        317,804   
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A., 4.25%, 4/15/24      67,000        68,059   
Enel Finance International N.V., 4.875%, 3/11/20    EUR 200,000        297,221   
Enel S.p.A., 6.25%, 6/20/19    GBP 100,000        182,785   
Greenko Dutch B.V., 8%, 8/01/19 (n)    $ 378,000        355,320   
NGG Finance PLC, FRN, 5.625%, 6/18/73    GBP 100,000        165,251   
NRG Energy, Inc., 8.25%, 9/01/20    $ 1,085,000        1,163,663   
NRG Energy, Inc., 6.25%, 7/15/22      375,000        385,313   
NRG Energy, Inc., 6.625%, 3/15/23      1,605,000        1,681,237   
PG&E Corp., 2.4%, 3/01/19      166,000        166,922   
PPL WEM Holdings PLC, 5.375%, 5/01/21 (n)      250,000        283,884   
Red Electrica de Espana, 4.75%, 2/16/18    EUR 100,000        140,536   
Southern Electric Power Co. Ltd., 4.625%, 2/20/37    GBP 100,000        173,092   
Transelec S.A., 4.25%, 1/14/25 (n)    $ 200,000        200,420   
Viridian Group FundCo II, Ltd., 11.125%, 4/01/17 (n)      333,000        356,310   
    

 

 

 
             $ 11,878,296   
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $624,628,830)            $ 627,948,920   

 

35


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - 1.7%                 
Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Aerospace - 0.1%                 
TransDigm, Inc., Term Loan C, 3.75%, 2/28/20    $ 609,765      $ 604,430   
Building - 0.1%                 
ABC Supply Co., Inc., Term Loan, 3.5%, 4/16/20    $ 149,320      $ 146,296   
HD Supply, Inc., Term Loan B, 4%, 6/28/18      81,851        81,570   
    

 

 

 
             $ 227,866   
Business Services - 0.1%                 
Fleetcor Technologies, Inc., Term Loan B, 3.75%, 9/24/21 (o)    $ 318,170      $ 319,363   
Cable TV - 0.0%                 
Cequel Communications LLC, Term Loan B, 3.5%, 2/14/19    $ 81,786      $ 80,954   
Conglomerates - 0.1%                 
Entegris, Inc., Term Loan B, 3.5%, 4/30/21    $ 147,632      $ 146,340   
Silver II U.S. Holdings LLC, Term Loan, 4%, 12/13/19      554,102        541,058   
    

 

 

 
             $ 687,398   
Consumer Services - 0.1%                 
Realogy Corp., Term Loan B, 3.75%, 3/05/20    $ 309,431      $ 307,884   
Containers - 0.1%                 
Berry Plastics Group, Inc., Term Loan E, 3.75%, 1/06/21    $ 394,468      $ 388,973   
Electronics - 0.1%                 
Avago Technologies Cayman Ltd., Term Loan B, 3.75%, 5/06/21    $ 774,231      $ 773,678   
Energy - Independent - 0.1%                 
MEG Energy Corp., Term Loan, 3.75%, 3/31/20    $ 532,181      $ 517,546   
Entertainment - 0.1%                 
Cedar Fair LP, Term Loan B, 3.25%, 3/06/20    $ 332,694      $ 331,586   
Food & Beverages - 0.0%                 
H.J. Heinz Co., Term Loan B2, 3.5%, 6/05/20    $ 223,309      $ 222,946   
Gaming & Lodging - 0.0%                 
Hilton Worldwide Finance LLC, Term Loan B2, 3.5%, 10/25/20    $ 129,134      $ 127,797   
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 0.2%                 
Community Health Systems, Inc., Term Loan D, 4.25%, 1/27/21    $ 185,914      $ 186,291   

 

36


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - continued                 
Medical & Health Technology & Services - continued           
DaVita HealthCare Partners, Inc., Term Loan B, 3.5%, 6/24/21 (o)    $ 951,835      $ 945,886   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,132,177   
Metals & Mining - 0.1%                 
FMG Resources Ltd., Term Loan B, 3.75%, 6/30/19    $ 441,728      $ 413,935   
Printing & Publishing - 0.0%                 
CBS Outdoor Americas Capital LLC, Term Loan B, 3%, 1/31/21    $ 96,113      $ 94,225   
Retailers - 0.1%                 
Dollar Tree, Inc., Bridge Term Loan, 8/08/15 (o)    $ 510,000      $ 510,000   
Rite Aid Corp., Second Lien Term Loan, 4.87%, 6/21/21      44,587        44,559   
    

 

 

 
             $ 554,559   
Specialty Stores - 0.0%                 
Men’s Wearhouse, Inc., Term Loan B, 4.5%, 6/18/21    $ 110,723      $ 110,689   
Supermarkets - 0.1%                 
Albertson’s Holdings LLC, Term Loan B4, 4.5%, 8/25/21    $ 640,006      $ 641,706   
Telephone Services - 0.1%                 
Level 3 Financing, Inc., Term Loan B5, 4.5%, 1/31/22    $ 758,570      $ 761,008   
Transportation - Services - 0.2%                 
Commercial Barge Line Co., First Lien Term Loan, 7.5%, 9/15/19    $ 1,110,140      $ 1,110,140   
Utilities - Electric Power - 0.0%                 
Calpine Construction Finance Co., Term Loan B1, 3%, 5/03/20    $ 123,139      $ 120,419   
Total Floating Rate Loans (Identified Cost, $9,583,586)      $ 9,529,279   
Convertible Bonds - 0.0%                 
Network & Telecom - 0.0%                 
Nortel Networks Corp., 2.125%, 4/15/49 (Identified Cost, $192,963) (a)(d)    $ 195,000      $ 191,100   
Common Stocks - 0.0%                 
Automotive - 0.0%                 
Accuride Corp. (Identified Cost, $227,574) (a)      12,648      $ 59,193   

 

37


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Money Market Funds - 1.0%                 
Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.09%, at Cost and Net Asset Value (v)      5,215,597      $ 5,215,597   
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $639,848,550)            $ 642,944,089   
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - (17.2)%        (94,413,798
Net Assets - 100.0%            $ 548,530,291   

 

(a) Non-income producing security.
(d) In default.
(f) All or a portion of the security has been segregated as collateral for open futures contracts.
(g) The rate shown represents a weighted average coupon rate on settled positions at period end, unless otherwise indicated.
(i) Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security.
(n) Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $186,727,049, representing 34.0% of net assets.
(o) All or a portion of this position has not settled. Upon settlement date, interest rates for unsettled amounts will be determined. The rate shown, if any, represents the weighted average coupon rate for settled amounts.
(p) Payment-in-kind security for which interest income may be received in additional securities and/or cash. During the period, the following amount of interest income was received in additional securities and/or cash:

 

Payment-in-kind Securities    Cash    Additional
Securities
 
Jo-Ann Stores Holdings, Inc., 9.75%, 10/15/19    $83,850      $—   
Schaeffler Holding Finance B.V., 6.25%, 11/15/19           
Total    $—      $—   

 

(q) Interest received was less than stated coupon rate.
(r) Remaining maturities of floating rate loans may be less than stated maturities shown as a result of contractual or optional prepayments by the borrower. Such prepayments cannot be predicted with certainty. These loans may be subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans generally have rates of interest which are determined periodically by reference to a base lending rate plus a premium.
(v) Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end.
(z)

Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these

 

38


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

  securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities:

 

Restricted Securities    Acquisition
Date
   Cost      Value  
American Media, Inc., 13.5%, 6/15/18    12/22/10      $12,024         $12,730   
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.752%, 12/28/40    3/01/06      671,248         401,001   
Dryden Senior Loan Fund, 2013-26A, “A”, CLO, FRN, 1.33%, 7/15/25    9/26/14      711,543         710,270   
Elementia S.A. de C.V., 5.5%, 1/15/25    11/20/14      205,987         210,840   
Empresa Electrica Angamos S.A., 4.875%, 5/25/29    11/20/14      314,308         317,804   
Energy XXI Gulf Coast, Inc., 6.875%, 3/15/24    11/24/14-11/25/14      149,678         146,250   
Gruma S.A.B. de C.V., 4.875%, 12/01/24    11/20/14      201,796         206,545   
Israel Chemicals Ltd., 4.5%, 12/02/24    11/20/14      2,442,411         2,487,675   
KazMunayGas National Co., 6%, 11/07/44    10/31/14      197,264         187,750   
LGE Holdco VI B.V., 7.125%, 5/15/24    7/21/11-3/15/12      902,518         871,119   
Loxam SAS, 4.875%, 7/23/21    7/18/14      473,357         431,150   
Republic of Indonesia, 2.875%, 7/08/21    7/02/14      237,522         224,557   
Schaeffler Holding Finance B.V., 6.25%, 11/15/19    10/21/14      474,427         491,738   
Sensata Technologies B.V., 5.625%, 11/01/24    10/07/14-10/16/14      476,821         504,094   
Unitymedia KabelBW GmbH, 6.125%, 1/15/25    10/07/14      570,000         596,363   
Total Restricted Securities         $7,799,886   
% of Net assets         1.4%   

The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:

 

CDO   Collateralized Debt Obligation
CLO   Collateralized Loan Obligation
FRN   Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end.
PLC   Public Limited Company
REIT   Real Estate Investment Trust

Abbreviations indicate amounts shown in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. All amounts are stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. A list of abbreviations is shown below:

 

AUD   Australian Dollar
BRL   Brazilian Real
CAD   Canadian Dollar
CHF   Swiss Franc
CNY   Chinese Yuan Renminbi
DKK   Danish Krone
EUR   Euro
GBP   British Pound
IDR   Indonesian Rupiah
JPY   Japanese Yen
KRW   Korean Won
MXN   Mexican Peso
NOK   Norwegian Krone

 

39


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

NZD   New Zealand Dollar
SEK   Swedish Krona
SGD   Singapore Dollar
ZAR   South African Rand

Derivative Contracts at 11/30/14

Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at 11/30/14

 

Type   Currency  

Counter-

party

  Contracts
to
Deliver/
Receive
    Settlement
Date Range
  In
Exchange
For
    Contracts
at Value
    Net
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
 
Asset Derivatives                            
SELL   AUD   Citibank N.A.     237,000      1/09/15     $205,458        $201,219        $4,239   
SELL   AUD   Goldman Sachs International     2,951,000      1/09/15     2,564,585        2,505,475        59,110   
SELL   AUD   Westpac Banking Corp.     2,493,298      1/09/15     2,157,687        2,116,874        40,813   
SELL   BRL   Citibank N.A.     8,225,250      12/02/14     3,212,863        3,206,913        5,950   
SELL   BRL   Goldman Sachs International     515,000      12/02/14     212,415        200,791        11,624   
SELL   BRL   UBS AG     7,709,690      12/02/14     3,138,358        3,005,903        132,455   
SELL   CAD   Barclays Bank PLC     281,827      1/09/15     249,847        246,154        3,693   
SELL   CAD   Goldman Sachs International     2,896,031      1/09/15     2,571,502        2,529,450        42,052   
SELL   CHF   UBS AG     2,288,918      1/09/15     2,372,563        2,371,255        1,308   
SELL   CNY   Deutsche Bank AG     16,246,000      5/04/15     2,625,192        2,611,199        13,993   
SELL   CNY   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.     16,403,000      3/09/15     2,650,776        2,644,713        6,063   
SELL   DKK   Citibank N.A.     2,818,044      1/09/15     476,997        471,362        5,635   
SELL   EUR   Credit Suisse Group     40,092,214      1/09/15     50,659,529        49,897,729        761,800   
SELL   EUR   Deutsche Bank AG     2,121,000      1/09/15     2,648,493        2,639,742        8,751   
SELL   EUR   Goldman Sachs International     1,339,203      1/09/15     1,710,182        1,666,738        43,444   
SELL   GBP   Barclays Bank PLC     1,192,906      1/09/15     1,914,718        1,865,293        49,425   
SELL   GBP   Credit Suisse Group     2,582,396      1/09/15     4,131,626        4,037,975        93,651   
SELL   GBP   Goldman Sachs International     1,629,000      1/09/15     2,553,112        2,547,193        5,919   
SELL   GBP   Merrill Lynch International     2,499,285      1/09/15     4,001,342        3,908,018        93,324   
SELL   JPY   Deutsche Bank AG     1,654,571,897      1/09/15     15,299,068        13,951,610        1,347,458   
SELL   JPY   Goldman Sachs International     89,177,000      1/09/15     796,516        751,954        44,562   

 

40


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at 11/30/14 - continued

 

Type   Currency  

Counter-

party

  Contracts
to
Deliver/
Receive
    Settlement
Date Range
  In
Exchange
For
    Contracts
at Value
    Net
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
 
Asset Derivatives - continued                            
SELL   JPY   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.     195,823,000      1/09/15     $1,748,635        $1,651,210        $97,425   
SELL   MXN   UBS AG     15,694,000      1/09/15     1,160,799        1,124,508        36,291   
SELL   NOK   Deutsche Bank AG     16,444,000      1/09/15     2,490,459        2,334,449        156,010   
SELL   NZD   Merrill Lynch International     446,831      1/09/15     352,237        348,950        3,287   
SELL   SEK   Goldman Sachs International     5,887,383      1/09/15     814,150        789,766        24,384   
BUY   ZAR   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.     360,852      1/09/15     31,742        32,354        612   
             

 

 

 
                $3,093,278   
             

 

 

 
Liability Derivatives                            
BUY   AUD   Goldman Sachs International     3,006,000      1/09/15     $2,624,674        $2,552,171        $(72,503
BUY   BRL   Citibank N.A.     8,225,250      12/02/14     3,300,000        3,206,913        (93,087
BUY   BRL   Goldman Sachs International     515,000      12/02/14     201,164        200,791        (373
BUY   BRL   UBS AG     7,709,690      12/02/14     3,011,480        3,005,903        (5,577
BUY   CAD   Barclays Bank PLC     2,990,000      1/09/15     2,656,282        2,611,524        (44,758
BUY   CAD   Merrill Lynch International     449,175      1/09/15     399,750        392,319        (7,431
BUY   CHF   Goldman Sachs International     2,310,000      1/09/15     2,409,867        2,393,095        (16,772
BUY   CNY   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.     32,643,000      3/09/15-5/04/15     5,272,223        5,254,941        (17,282
BUY   EUR   Barclays Bank PLC     28,000      1/09/15     35,496        34,848        (648
BUY   EUR   Citibank N.A.     1,064,492      1/09/15     1,339,275        1,324,839        (14,436
BUY   EUR   Goldman Sachs International     25,975      1/09/15     32,382        32,328        (54
BUY   EUR   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.     1,308,000      1/09/15     1,639,111        1,627,903        (11,208
BUY   EUR   Merrill Lynch International     209,238      1/09/15     265,246        260,412        (4,834
BUY   EUR   Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC     2,125,000      1/09/15     2,662,138        2,644,720        (17,418

 

41


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at 11/30/14 - continued

 

Type   Currency  

Counter-

party

  Contracts
to
Deliver/
Receive
    Settlement
Date Range
  In
Exchange
For
    Contracts
at Value
    Net
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
 
Liability Derivatives - continued                            
SELL   EUR   Credit Suisse Group     267,196      1/09/15     $332,062        $332,545        $(483
SELL   EUR   Deutsche Bank AG     888,018      1/09/15     1,104,613        1,105,204        (591
SELL   EUR   Goldman Sachs International     99,134      1/09/15     122,865        123,380        (515
BUY   GBP   Goldman Sachs International     1,662,000      1/09/15     2,655,455        2,598,794        (56,661
BUY   JPY   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.     285,000,000      1/09/15     2,445,430        2,403,165        (42,265
BUY   KRW   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.     44,218,500      12/16/14     41,419        39,884        (1,535
BUY   NOK   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.     16,433,951      1/09/15     2,534,090        2,333,023        (201,067
SELL   NZD   Credit Suisse Group     443,000      1/09/15     344,860        345,958        (1,098
SELL   NZD   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.     3,429,059      1/09/15     2,660,000        2,677,902        (17,902
SELL   NZD   Westpac Banking Corp.     317,828      1/09/15     245,945        248,205        (2,260
BUY   SGD   Citibank N.A.     40,141      1/09/15     31,435        30,789        (646
             

 

 

 
                $(631,404
             

 

 

 

Futures Contracts at 11/30/14

 

Description    Currency    Contracts    Value    Expiration
Date
     Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
 
Asset Derivatives            
Interest Rate Futures            
German Euro Buxl 30 yr (Long)    EUR    17    $3,172,541      December - 2014         $69,763   
German Euro Bund 10 yr (Long)    EUR    69    13,123,192      December - 2014         101,139   
Japanese
Government Bond 10 yr (Long)
   JPY    18    22,283,475      December - 2014         125,668   
United Kingdom Gilt 10 yr (Long)    GBP    35    6,434,142      March - 2015         66,646   

 

42


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Futures Contracts at 11/30/14 - continued

 

Description    Currency    Contracts    Value    Expiration
Date
   Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
 
Asset Derivatives - continued   
U.S. Treasury Bond 30 yr (Long)    USD    23    $3,280,375    March - 2015      $43,583   
              

 

 

 
                 $406,799   
              

 

 

 
Liability Derivatives            
Interest Rate Futures            
German Euro Bobl
5 yr (Long)
   EUR    115    $18,351,863    December - 2014      $(286
U.S. Treasury Note 10 yr (Short)    USD    909    115,485,609    March -2015      (841,166
              

 

 

 
                 $(841,452
              

 

 

 

At November 30, 2014, the fund had liquid securities with an aggregate value of $1,958,622 to cover any commitments for certain derivative contracts.

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

43


Table of Contents

Financial Statements

 

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

At 11/30/14

This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.

 

Assets         

Investments-

  

Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $634,632,953)

     $637,728,492   

Underlying affiliated funds, at cost and value

     5,215,597   

Total investments, at value (identified cost, $639,848,550)

     $642,944,089   

Cash

     215,447   

Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $30,986)

     30,903   

Receivables for

  

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts

     3,093,278   

Investments sold

     972,826   

Interest

     8,596,488   

Other assets

     4,227   

Total assets

     $655,857,258   
Liabilities         

Notes payable

     $100,000,000   

Payables for

  

Distributions

     139,579   

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts

     631,404   

Daily variation margin on open futures contracts

     271,756   

Investments purchased

     5,826,949   

Payable to affiliates

  

Investment adviser

     47,006   

Transfer agent and dividend disbursing costs

     4,234   

Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation

     25,044   

Accrued interest expense

     66,728   

Deferred country tax expense payable

     154,945   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     159,322   

Total liabilities

     $107,326,967   

Net assets

     $548,530,291   
Net assets consist of         

Paid-in capital

     $545,089,117   

Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies (net of $71,211 deferred country tax)

     4,984,081   

Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency

     (7,128,813

Undistributed net investment income

     5,585,906   

Net assets

     $548,530,291   

Shares of beneficial interest outstanding

     53,914,609   

Net asset value per share (net assets of $548,530,291 / 53,914,609 shares of beneficial interest outstanding)

     $10.17   

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

44


Table of Contents

Financial Statements

 

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year ended 11/30/14

This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.

 

Net investment income         

Income

  

Interest

     $33,205,168   

Dividends

     42,294   

Dividends from underlying affiliated funds

     34,018   

Foreign taxes withheld

     (1,714

Total investment income

     $33,279,766   

Expenses

  

Management fee

     $3,390,569   

Transfer agent and dividend disbursing costs

     62,824   

Administrative services fee

     83,477   

Independent Trustees’ compensation

     63,343   

Stock exchange fee

     48,407   

Custodian fee

     84,396   

Interest expense

     843,523   

Shareholder communications

     155,977   

Audit and tax fees

     77,614   

Legal fees

     13,641   

Miscellaneous

     50,695   

Total expenses

     $4,874,466   

Fees paid indirectly

     (411

Reduction of expenses by investment adviser

     (968

Net expenses

     $4,873,087   

Net investment income

     $28,406,679   
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency   

Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis)

  

Investments (net of $47,575 country tax)

     $8,999,768   

Futures contracts

     (1,088,245

Foreign currency

     5,387,082   

Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency

     $13,298,605   

Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

  

Investments (net of $71,211 increase in deferred country tax)

     $(12,562,618

Futures contracts

     (531,574

Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies

     2,003,652   

Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation

     $(11,090,540

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency

     $2,208,065   

Change in net assets from operations

     $30,614,744   

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

45


Table of Contents

Financial Statements

 

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.

 

     Years ended 11/30  
     2014      2013  
Change in net assets              
From operations                  

Net investment income

     $28,406,679         $31,244,163   

Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency

     13,298,605         17,978,804   

Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation

     (11,090,540      (27,896,527

Change in net assets from operations

     $30,614,744         $21,326,440   
Distributions declared to shareholders                  

From net investment income

     $(31,527,655      $(33,771,682

Change in net assets from fund share transactions

     $(7,794,409      $(1,032,873

Total change in net assets

     $(8,707,320      $(13,478,115
Net assets                  

At beginning of period

     557,237,611         570,715,726   

At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $5,585,906 and $728,227, respectively)

     $548,530,291         $557,237,611   

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

46


Table of Contents

Financial Statements

 

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Year ended 11/30/14

This statement provides a summary of cash flows from investment activity for the fund.

 

Cash flows from operating activities:         

Change in net assets from operations

     $30,614,744   
Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:         

Purchase of investment securities

     (386,983,153

Proceeds from disposition of investment securities

     324,495,566   

Payments for futures contracts

     (1,088,245

Proceeds from disposition of short-term investments, net

     66,567,778   

Realized gain/loss on investments

     (9,047,343

Realized gain/loss on futures contracts

     1,088,245   

Unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments

     12,491,407   

Unrealized appreciation/depreciation on foreign currency contracts

     (2,083,117

Net amortization/accretion of income

     2,421,871   

Decrease in interest receivable

     6,533   

Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities

     91,997   

Decrease in receivable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts

     27,344   

Increase in payable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts

     271,756   

Increase in other assets

     (581

Decrease in interest payable

     (4,390

Net cash provided by operating activities

     $38,870,412   
Cash flows from financing activities:         

Distributions paid in cash

     (31,533,225

Repurchase of shares of beneficial interest

     (7,794,409

Net cash used by financing activities

     $(39,327,634

Net decrease in cash

     $(457,222
Cash:         

Beginning of period (including foreign currency of $18,000)

     $703,572   

End of period (including foreign currency of $30,903)

     $246,350   

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid during the year ended November 30, 2014 for interest was $847,913.

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

47


Table of Contents

Financial Statements

 

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the past 5 years. Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.

 

    Years ended 11/30  
    2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  

Net asset value, beginning of period

    $10.17        $10.40        $9.59        $9.99        $9.50   
Income (loss) from investment operations                                   

Net investment income (d)

    $0.52        $0.57        $0.62        $0.66        $0.68   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
on investments and foreign currency

    0.04        (0.18     0.84        (0.31     0.52   

Total from investment operations

    $0.56        $0.39        $1.46        $0.35        $1.20   
Less distributions declared to shareholders                                   

From net investment income

    $(0.58     $(0.62     $(0.65     $(0.75     $(0.71

Net increase from repurchase of capital shares

    $0.02        $0.00 (w)      $—        $—        $—   

Net asset value, end of period (x)

    $10.17        $10.17        $10.40        $9.59        $9.99   

Market value, end of period

    $8.81        $8.97        $10.19        $8.93        $9.51   

Total return at market value (%)

    4.68        (6.13     21.92        1.79        14.36   

Total return at net asset value (%) (j)(r)(s)(x)

    6.58        4.28        15.87        4.06        13.30   
Ratios (%) (to average net assets)
and Supplemental data:
                                       

Expenses before expense reductions (f)

    0.87        0.92        0.98        1.00        1.11   

Expenses after expense reductions (f)

    0.87        0.92        0.98        1.00        1.11   

Net investment income

    5.09        5.53        6.12        6.60        6.93   

Portfolio turnover

    44        52        45        47        56   

Net assets at end of period (000 omitted)

    $548,530        $557,238        $570,716        $526,317        $548,397   
Supplemental Ratios (%):                                        

Ratio of expenses to average net assets after
expense reductions and excluding interest
expense (f)

    0.72        0.75        0.79        0.79        0.82   
Senior Securities:                                        

Total notes payable outstanding (000 omitted)

    $100,000        $100,000        $100,000        $100,000        $100,000   

Asset coverage per $1,000 of indebtedness (k)

    $6,485        $6,572        $6,707        $6,263        $6,484   

 

48


Table of Contents

Financial Highlights – continued

 

 

(d) Per share data is based on average shares outstanding.
(f) Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable.
(j) Total return at net asset value is calculated using the net asset value of the fund, not the publicly traded price and therefore may be different than the total return at market value.
(k) Calculated by subtracting the fund’s total liabilities (not including notes payable) from the fund’s total assets and dividing this number by the notes payable outstanding and then multiplying by 1,000.
(r) Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower.
(s) From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower.
(w) Per share amount was less than $0.01.
(x) The net asset values per share and total returns at net asset value per share have been calculated on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes.

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

49


Table of Contents

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Business and Organization

MFS Charter Income Trust (the fund) is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified closed-end management investment company.

The fund is an investment company and accordingly follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies.

(2) Significant Accounting Policies

General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund invests in high-yield securities rated below investment grade. Investments in high-yield securities involve greater degrees of credit and market risk than investments in higher-rated securities and tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions. The fund invests in foreign securities, including securities of emerging market issuers. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment. The markets of emerging markets countries are generally more volatile than the markets of developed countries with more mature economies. All of the risks of investing in foreign securities previously described are heightened when investing in emerging markets countries.

In June 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) – Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures (“ASU 2014-11”). ASU 2014-11 changes the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions (i.e., repurchase agreements that settle at the same time as the maturity of the transferred financial asset) and enhances the required disclosures for repurchase agreements and other similar transactions. Although still evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2014-11 to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures which would first be effective for interim reporting periods beginning after March 15, 2015.

Balance Sheet Offsetting – The fund’s accounting policy with respect to balance sheet offsetting is that, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty. The fund’s right to setoff may be restricted

 

50


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

or prohibited by the bankruptcy or insolvency laws of the particular jurisdiction to which a specific master netting agreement counterparty is subject. Balance sheet offsetting disclosures, to the extent applicable to the fund, have been included in the fund’s Significant Accounting Policies note under the captions for each of the fund’s in-scope financial instruments and transactions.

Investment Valuations – Debt instruments and floating rate loans, including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Equity securities, including restricted equity securities, are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which they are primarily traded. Equity securities, for which there were no sales reported that day, are generally valued at the last quoted daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which such securities are primarily traded. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Futures contracts are generally valued at last posted settlement price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which they are primarily traded. Futures contracts for which there were no trades that day for a particular position are generally valued at the closing bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which such futures contracts are primarily traded. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of bid and asked prices for the time period interpolated from rates provided by a third-party pricing service for proximate time periods. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.

The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services

 

51


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as futures contracts and forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The following is a summary of the levels used as of November 30, 2014 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:

 

Investments at Value    Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  
Equity Securities      $59,193         $—         $—         $59,193   
U.S. Treasury Bonds & U.S. Government Agency & Equivalents              48,898,274                 48,898,274   
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt              103,922,347                 103,922,347   
U.S. Corporate Bonds              313,515,663                 313,515,663   
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities              15,725,898                 15,725,898   
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities              19,759,232                 19,759,232   
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs)              1,318,002                 1,318,002   
Foreign Bonds              125,000,604                 125,000,604   
Floating Rate Loans              9,529,279                 9,529,279   
Mutual Funds      5,215,597                         5,215,597   
Total Investments      $5,274,790         $637,669,299         $—         $642,944,089   
Other Financial Instruments                            
Futures Contracts      $(434,653      $—         $—         $(434,653
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts              2,461,874                 2,461,874   

 

52


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.

The following is a reconciliation of level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value. The fund’s policy is to recognize transfers between the levels as of the end of the period. The table presents the activity of level 3 securities held at the beginning and the end of the period.

 

     Equity Securities  
Balance as of 11/30/13      $14,929   

Realized gain (loss)

     (43,025

Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

     28,644   

Proceeds from a tender offer

     (548
Balance as of 11/30/14      $—   

Foreign Currency Translation Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.

Derivatives – The fund uses derivatives for different purposes, primarily to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market or segment of the market, or security, to increase or decrease interest rate or currency exposure, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives are used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.

The derivative instruments used by the fund were futures contracts and forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The fund’s period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract tables, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.

The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at November 30, 2014 as reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:

 

        Fair Value (a)  
Risk   Derivative Contracts   Asset Derivatives     Liability Derivatives  
Interest Rate   Interest Rate Futures     $406,799        $(841,452)   
Foreign Exchange   Forward Foreign Currency Exchange     3,093,278        (631,404
Total       $3,500,077        $(1,472,856)   

 

 

53


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

(a) The value of futures contracts includes cumulative appreciation (depreciation) as reported in the fund’s Portfolio of Investments. Only the current day variation margin for futures contracts is separately reported within the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the year ended November 30, 2014 as reported in the Statement of Operations:

 

Risk    Futures
Contracts
     Foreign
Currency
 
Interest Rate      $(1,088,245      $—   
Foreign Exchange              5,202,338   
Total      $(1,088,245      $5,202,338   

The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the year ended November 30, 2014 as reported in the Statement of Operations:

 

Risk    Futures
Contracts
     Translation
of Assets
and
Liabilities in
Foreign
Currencies
 
Interest Rate      $(531,574      $—   
Foreign Exchange              2,083,117   
Total      $(531,574      $2,083,117   

Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain, but not all, over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an ISDA Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. Upon an event of default or a termination of the ISDA Master Agreement, the non-defaulting party has the right to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. The fund’s right to setoff may be restricted or prohibited by the bankruptcy or insolvency laws of the particular jurisdiction to which a specific ISDA counterparty is subject.

Collateral and margin requirements differ by type of derivative. Margin requirements are set by the broker or clearing house for cleared derivatives (i.e., futures contracts, cleared swaps, and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forward foreign currency exchange contracts, uncleared swap agreements, and over-the-counter options). For derivatives

 

54


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash that has been segregated to cover the fund’s collateral or margin obligations under derivative contracts, if any, will be reported separately in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as “Restricted cash” or “Deposits with brokers.” Securities pledged as collateral or margin for the same purpose, if any, are noted in the Portfolio of Investments.

Futures Contracts – The fund entered into futures contracts which may be used to hedge against or obtain broad market exposure, interest rate exposure, currency exposure, or to manage duration. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date.

Upon entering into a futures contract, the fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an initial margin in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the notional amount of the contract. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the contract, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gain or loss by the fund until the contract is closed or expires at which point the gain or loss on futures contracts is realized.

The fund bears the risk of interest rates, exchange rates or securities prices moving unexpectedly, in which case, the fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. While futures contracts may present less counterparty risk to the fund since the contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse guarantees payments to the broker, there is still counterparty credit risk due to the insolvency of the broker. The fund’s maximum risk of loss due to counterparty credit risk is equal to the margin posted by the fund to the broker plus any gains or minus any losses on the outstanding futures contracts.

Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts – The fund entered into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date. These contracts may be used to hedge the fund’s currency risk or for non-hedging purposes. For hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts to deliver or receive foreign currency that the fund will receive from or use in its normal investment activities. The fund may also use contracts to hedge against declines in the value of foreign currency denominated securities due to unfavorable exchange rate movements. For non-hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts with the intent of changing the relative exposure of the fund’s portfolio of securities to different currencies to take advantage of anticipated exchange rate changes.

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a receivable or payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts until the contract settlement date. On contract settlement date, any gain or loss on the contract is recorded as realized gains or losses on foreign currency.

Risks may arise upon entering into these contracts from unanticipated movements in the value of the contract and from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. Generally, the fund’s maximum risk due to counterparty credit risk is the unrealized gain on the contract due to the use of Continuous Linked

 

55


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

Settlement, an industry accepted settlement system. This risk is mitigated in cases where there is an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and for posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.

Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments – The fund invests in loans and loan participations or other receivables. These investments may include standby financing commitments, including revolving credit facilities, which contractually obligate the fund to supply additional cash to the borrower on demand. The fund generally provides this financial support in order to preserve its existing investment or to obtain a more senior secured interest in the assets of the borrower. Loan participations involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other financial intermediary.

Statement of Cash Flows – Information on financial transactions which have been settled through the receipt or disbursement of cash is presented in the Statement of Cash Flows. The cash amount shown in the Statement of Cash Flows is the amount included within the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and includes cash on hand at its custodian bank and does not include any short term investments.

Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.

Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The fund earns certain fees in connection with its floating rate loan purchasing activities. These fees are in addition to interest payments earned and may include amendment fees, commitment fees, facility fees, consent fees, and prepayment fees. Commitment fees are recorded on an accrual basis as income in the accompanying financial statements. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded when the fund is informed of the dividend if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables when deemed uncollectible.

The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized

 

56


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.

The fund invests a significant portion of its assets in asset-backed and/or mortgage-backed securities. The value of these securities may depend, in part, on the issuer’s or borrower’s credit quality or ability to pay principal and interest when due and may fall if an issuer or borrower defaults on its obligation to pay principal or interest or if the instrument’s credit rating is downgraded by a credit rating agency. U.S. Government securities not supported as to the payment of principal or interest by the U.S. Treasury, such as those issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks, are subject to greater credit risk than are U.S. Government securities supported by the U.S. Treasury, such as those issued by Ginnie Mae.

The fund purchased or sold debt securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, or in a “To Be Announced” (TBA) or “forward commitment” transaction with delivery or payment to occur at a later date beyond the normal settlement period. At the time a fund enters into a commitment to purchase or sell a security, the transaction is recorded and the value of the security acquired is reflected in the fund’s net asset value. The price of such security and the date that the security will be delivered and paid for are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. The value of the security may vary with market fluctuations. No interest accrues to the fund until payment takes place. At the time that a fund enters into this type of transaction, the fund is required to have sufficient cash and/or liquid securities to cover its commitments. Losses may arise due to changes in the value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract’s terms, or if the issuer does not issue the securities due to political, economic or other factors. Additionally, losses may arise due to declines in the value of the securities prior to settlement date.

To mitigate this risk of loss on TBA securities and other types of forward settling mortgage-backed securities, the fund whenever possible enters into a Master Securities Forward Transaction Agreement (“MSFTA”) on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The MSFTA gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. Upon an event of default or a termination of the MSFTA, the non-defaulting party has the right to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the MSFTA could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any.

For mortgage-backed securities traded under a MSFTA, the collateral and margining requirements are contract specific. Collateral amounts across all transactions traded under such agreement are netted and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash that has been pledged to cover the fund’s collateral or margin obligations under a MSFTA, if any, will be reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities pledged as collateral or margin for the same purpose, if any, are noted in the Portfolio of Investments.

 

57


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the year ended November 30, 2014, is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.

Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period. Management has analyzed the fund’s tax positions taken on federal and state tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability. Foreign taxes, if any, have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements in accordance with the applicable foreign tax law. Foreign income taxes may be withheld by certain countries in which the fund invests. Additionally, capital gains realized by the fund on securities issued in or by certain foreign countries may be subject to capital gains tax imposed by those countries.

Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.

Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities, straddle loss deferrals, and derivative transactions.

The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last two fiscal years is as follows:

 

     11/30/14      11/30/13  
Ordinary income (including any
short-term capital gains)
     $31,527,655         $33,771,682   

 

58


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:

 

As of 11/30/14       
Cost of investments      $644,135,184   
Gross appreciation      17,480,250   
Gross depreciation      (18,671,345
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)      $(1,191,095
Undistributed ordinary income      9,840,731   
Capital loss carry forwards      (3,074,945
Other temporary differences      (2,133,517

Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”), net capital losses recognized for fund fiscal years beginning after November 30, 2011 may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses (“post-enactment losses”). Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses (“pre-enactment losses”). As a transition rule, the Act requires that all post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.

As of November 30, 2014, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such pre-enactment losses expire as follows:

 

11/30/17   $(3,074,945)

(3) Transactions with Affiliates

Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.32% of the fund’s average daily net assets and 4.57% of gross income less interest expense from leveraging. Gross income is calculated based on tax elections that generally include the accretion of discount and exclude the amortization of premium, which may differ from investment income reported in the Statement of Operations. The management fee, from net assets and gross income, incurred for the year ended November 30, 2014 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.61% of the fund’s average daily net assets.

Transfer Agent – The fund engages Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (“Computershare”) as the sole transfer agent for the fund. MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC) monitors and supervises the activities of Computershare for an agreed upon fee approved by the Board of Trustees. For the year ended November 30, 2014, these fees paid to MFSC amounted to $16,586.

Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the year ended November 30, 2014 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0149% of the fund’s average daily net assets.

 

59


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS and MFSC.

Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. Effective January 1, 2002, accrued benefits under the DB plan for then-current independent Trustees who continued were credited to an unfunded retirement deferral plan (the “Retirement Deferral plan”), which was established for and exists solely with respect to these credited amounts, and is not available for other deferrals by these or other independent Trustees. Although the Retirement Deferral plan is unfunded, amounts deferred under the plan are periodically adjusted for investment experience as if they had been invested in shares of the fund. The DB plan resulted in a pension expense of $792 and the Retirement Deferral plan resulted in an expense of $185. Both amounts are included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the year ended November 30, 2014. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under both plans amounted to $24,984 at November 30, 2014, and is included in “Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

Other – Effective November 1, 2014, this fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into a service agreement (the ISO Agreement) which provides for payment of fees solely by the funds to Tarantino LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Senior Officer (ISO) for the funds. Frank L. Tarantino serves as the ISO and is an officer of the funds and the sole member of Tarantino LLC. The funds can terminate the ISO Agreement with Tarantino LLC at any time under the terms of the ISO Agreement. Prior to November 1, 2014, the funds had entered into services agreements (the ICCO Agreements) which provided for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. Prior to November 1, 2014, Frank L. Tarantino served as the ICCO. Effective October 31, 2014, Mr. Tarantino resigned as ICCO and the ICCO Agreement between the funds and Tarantino LLC was terminated. Prior to June 1, 2014, Robyn L. Griffin served as the Assistant ICCO and was an officer of the funds. Ms. Griffin is the sole member of Griffin Compliance LLC. Effective May 31, 2014, Ms. Griffin resigned as Assistant ICCO and the ICCO Agreement between the funds and Griffin Compliance LLC was terminated. For the year ended November 30, 2014, the aggregate fees paid by the fund under these agreements were $2,633 and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations. MFS had agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund for the services under the ICCO Agreements in the amount of $968, which

 

60


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

is included in the reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO, Assistant ICCO, and ISO.

The fund invests in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” in the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.

(4) Portfolio Securities

For the year ended November 30, 2014, purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, were as follows:

 

     Purchases      Sales  
U.S. Government securities      $40,473,242         $20,994,492   
Investments (non-U.S. Government securities)      $290,596,007         $248,647,582   

(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest

The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. The Trustees have authorized the repurchase by the fund of up to 10% annually of its own shares of beneficial interest. The fund repurchased and retired 856,717 shares of beneficial interest during the year ended November 30, 2014 at an average price per share of $9.10 and a weighted average discount of 11.19% per share. The fund repurchased and retired 115,800 shares of beneficial interest during the year ended November 30, 2013 at an average price per share of $8.92 and a weighted average discount of 11.47% per share. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:

 

     Year ended
11/30/14
     Year ended
11/30/13
 
     Shares      Amount      Shares      Amount  
Capital shares reacquired      (856,717      $(7,794,409      (115,800      $(1,032,873

(6) Loan Agreement

The fund has a credit agreement with a bank for a revolving secured line of credit that can be drawn upon up to $100,000,000. This credit agreement matured on August 22, 2014. The trustees approved the renewal of the revolving secured line of credit up to the amount of $100,000,000 on substantially similar terms for an additional 364 day period which matures on August 21, 2015. At November 30, 2014, the fund had outstanding borrowings under this agreement in the amount of $100,000,000, which are secured by a lien on the fund’s assets. The loan’s carrying value in the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities approximates its fair value. The loan value as of the reporting date is considered Level 2 under the fair value hierarchy. Borrowing under the agreement can be made for liquidity or leverage purposes. Interest is charged at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread or an alternate rate, at the option of the borrower, stated as the greater of Overnight LIBOR or the Federal Funds Rate each plus an agreed upon spread. The fund incurred interest expense of $843,523 during the period in connection with this loan agreement. The fund may also be charged a commitment fee based on the average daily unused portion of the revolving secured line of credit. The fund did not incur a commitment fee during the period. For

 

61


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

the year ended November 30, 2014, the average loan balance was $100,000,000 at a weighted average annual interest rate of 0.84%. The fund is subject to certain covenants including, but not limited to, requirements with respect to asset coverage, portfolio diversification and liquidity.

(7) Transactions in Underlying Affiliated Funds-Affiliated Issuers

An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be an affiliated issuer:

 

Underlying Affiliated Fund    Beginning
Shares/Par
Amount
     Acquisitions
Shares/Par
Amount
     Dispositions
Shares/Par
Amount
     Ending
Shares/Par
Amount
 
MFS Institutional Money
Market Portfolio
     71,783,375         148,475,554         (215,043,332      5,215,597   
Underlying Affiliated Fund    Realized
Gain (Loss)
     Capital Gain
Distributions
     Dividend
Income
     Ending
Value
 
MFS Institutional Money
Market Portfolio
     $—         $—         $34,018         $5,215,597   

 

62


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of MFS Charter Income Trust:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of MFS Charter Income Trust (the Fund), as of November 30, 2014, and the related statements of operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2014, by correspondence with the custodian and others or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from others were not received. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MFS Charter Income Trust at November 30, 2014, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

LOGO

Boston, Massachusetts

January 15, 2015

 

63


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF SHAREHOLDER MEETING

(unaudited)

At the annual meeting of shareholders of MFS Intermediate Income Trust, which was held on October 2, 2014, the following action was taken:

Item 1: To elect the following individuals as Trustees:

 

     Number of Shares  

Nominee

   For     

Withheld Authority

 
Steven E. Buller      47,082,182.484         849,652.584   
William R. Gutow      47,110,606.845         821,228.223   
Michael Hegarty      47,196,463.912         735,371.156   
John P. Kavanaugh      47,247,258.457         684,576.611   
Robert W. Uek      47,190,294.174         741,540.894   

 

64


Table of Contents

TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS — IDENTIFICATION AND BACKGROUND

The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, as of January 1, 2015, are listed below, together with their principal occupations during the past five years. (Their titles may have varied during that period.) The address of each Trustee and Officer is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-7618.

 

Name, Age

 

Position(s)
Held

with Fund

 

Trustee/Officer

Since (h)

 

Term

Expiring

 

Principal
Occupations During

the Past Five Years

 

Other

Directorships (j)

INTERESTED TRUSTEES
Robert J. Manning (k)
(age 51)
  Trustee   February 2004   2016   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director; President (until 2009); Chief Investment Officer (until 2010)   N/A

Robin A. Stelmach (k)

(age 53)

  Trustee and President   January 2014   2015  

Massachusetts Financial

Services Company,

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

  N/A
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES
David H. Gunning
(age 72)
  Trustee and Chair of Trustees   January 2004   2015   Private investor   Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (welding equipment manufacturer), Director; Development Alternatives, Inc. (consulting), Director/Non-Executive Chairman

 

65


Table of Contents

Trustees and Officers – continued

 

Name, Age

 

Position(s)
Held

with Fund

 

Trustee/Officer

Since (h)

 

Term

Expiring

 

Principal
Occupations During

the Past Five Years

 

Other

Directorships (j)

Steven E. Buller
(age 63)
  Trustee   February 2014   2014   Chairman, Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council; Standing Advisory Group, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Member (until 2014); BlackRock, Inc. (investment management), Managing Director (until 2014), BlackRock Finco UK (investment management), Director (until 2014)   N/A
Robert E. Butler
(age 73)
  Trustee   January 2006   2015   Consultant – investment company industry regulatory and compliance matters   N/A
Maureen R. Goldfarb
(age 59)
  Trustee   January 2009   2016   Private investor   N/A
William R. Gutow
(age 73)
  Trustee   December 1993   2014   Private investor and real estate consultant; Capitol Entertainment Management Company (video franchise), Vice Chairman   Texas Donuts (donut franchise), Vice Chairman (until 2010)
Michael Hegarty
(age 70)
  Trustee   December 2004   2014   Private investor   Brookfield Office Properties, Inc. (real estate), Director; Rouse Properties Inc. (real estate), Director; Capmark Financial Group Inc. (real estate), Director
John P. Kavanaugh
(age 60)
  Trustee   January 2009   2014   Private investor   N/A

 

66


Table of Contents

Trustees and Officers – continued

 

Name, Age

 

Position(s)
Held

with Fund

 

Trustee/Officer

Since (h)

 

Term

Expiring

 

Principal
Occupations During

the Past Five Years

 

Other

Directorships (j)

Maryanne L. Roepke
(age 58)
  Trustee   May 2014   2016   American Century Investments (investment management), Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer (until 2014)   N/A
Laurie J. Thomsen
(age 57)
  Trustee   March 2005   2016   Private investor; New Profit, Inc. (venture philanthropy), Executive Partner (until 2010)   The Travelers Companies (insurance), Director
Robert W. Uek
(age 73)
  Trustee   January 2006   2014   Consultant to investment company industry   N/A
OFFICERS
Christopher R. Bohane (k)
(age 40)
  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   July 2005   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Assistant General Counsel   N/A
Kino Clark (k)
(age 46)
  Assistant Treasurer   January 2012   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President   N/A
Thomas H. Connors (k)
(age 55)
 

Assistant

Secretary and Assistant Clerk

  September 2012   N/A  

Massachusetts Financial Services Company,

Vice President and Senior Counsel; Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (financial service provider), Director and Senior Counsel (until 2012)

  N/A
Ethan D. Corey (k)
(age 51)
  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   July 2005   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel   N/A

 

67


Table of Contents

Trustees and Officers – continued

 

Name, Age

 

Position(s)
Held

with Fund

 

Trustee/Officer

Since (h)

 

Term

Expiring

 

Principal
Occupations During

the Past Five Years

 

Other

Directorships (j)

David L. DiLorenzo (k)
(age 46)
  Treasurer   July 2005   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President   N/A
Timothy M. Fagan (k)
(age 46)
  Chief Compliance Officer   November 2014   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Chief Compliance Officer; Vice President and Senior Counsel (until 2012)   N/A
Brian E. Langenfeld (k)
(age 41)
  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   June 2006   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel   N/A

Susan S. Newton (k)

(age 64)

  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   May 2005   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel   N/A
Susan A. Pereira (k)
(age 44)
  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   July 2005   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel   N/A
Kasey L. Phillips (k)
(age 44)
  Assistant Treasurer   September 2012   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President; Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, Senior Vice President, Fund Treasurer (until 2012)   N/A
Mark N. Polebaum (k)
(age 62)
  Secretary and Clerk   January 2006   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary   N/A
Matthew A. Stowe (k)
(age 40)
  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   October 2014   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel   N/A

 

68


Table of Contents

Trustees and Officers – continued

 

Name, Age

 

Position(s)
Held

with Fund

 

Trustee/Officer

Since (h)

 

Term

Expiring

 

Principal
Occupations During

the Past Five Years

 

Other

Directorships (j)

Frank L. Tarantino
(age 70)
  Independent Senior Officer   June 2004   N/A   Tarantino LLC (provider of compliance services), Principal   N/A
Richard S. Weitzel (k)
(age 44)
  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   October 2007   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel   N/A
James O. Yost (k)
(age 54)
  Deputy Treasurer   September 1990   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President   N/A

 

(h) Date first appointed to serve as Trustee/officer of an MFS Fund. Each Trustee has served continuously since appointment unless indicated otherwise. For the period from December 15, 2004 until February 22, 2005, Mr. Manning served as Advisory Trustee. Prior to January 2012, Messrs. DiLorenzo and Yost served as Assistant Treasurers of the Funds. Ms. Stelmach was appointed as President of the Funds as of October 1, 2014.
(j) Directorships or trusteeships of companies required to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (i.e., “public companies”).
(k) “Interested person” of the Trust within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (referred to as the 1940 Act), which is the principal federal law governing investment companies like the fund, as a result of position with MFS. The address of MFS is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-7618.

The Trust holds annual shareholder meetings for the purpose of electing Trustees, and Trustees are elected for fixed terms. The Board of Trustees is currently divided into three classes, each having a term of three years which term expires on the date of the third annual meeting following the election to office of the Trustee’s class. Each year the term of one class expires. Each Trustee and officer will serve until next elected or his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal.

Messrs. Butler, Kavanaugh, Uek and Mses. Thomsen and Roepke are members of the Fund’s Audit Committee.

Each of the Fund’s Trustees and officers holds comparable positions with certain other funds of which MFS or a subsidiary is the investment adviser or distributor, and, in the case of the officers, with certain affiliates of MFS. As of January 1, 2015, the Trustees served as board members of 135 funds within the MFS Family of Funds.

 

69


Table of Contents

Trustees and Officers – continued

 

 

 

Investment Adviser   Custodian
Massachusetts Financial Services Company   State Street Bank and Trust Company
111 Huntington Avenue   1 Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02199-7618   Boston, MA 02111-2900
Portfolio Managers   Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Richard Hawkins   Ernst & Young LLP
William Adams   200 Clarendon Street
Ward Brown   Boston, MA 02116
David Cole  
Pilar Gomez-Bravo  
Joshua Marston  
Robert Persons  
Matthew Ryan  
Erik Weisman  

 

70


Table of Contents

BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2014 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.

In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.

In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance (based on net asset value) of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2013 and the investment performance (based on net asset value) of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment

 

71


Table of Contents

Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued

 

advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.

The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.

Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s common shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s common shares ranked 16th out of a total of 20 funds in the Lipper performance universe for this three-year period (a ranking of first place out of the total number of funds in the performance universe indicating the best performer and a ranking of last place out of the total number of funds in the performance universe indicating the worst performer). The total return performance of the Fund’s common shares ranked 12th out of a total of 20 funds for the one-year period and 13th out of a total of 16 funds for the five-year period ended December 31, 2013. Given the size of the Lipper performance universe and information previously provided by MFS regarding differences between the Fund and the other fund in its Lipper performance universe, the Trustees also reviewed the Fund’s performance in comparison to a custom benchmark developed by MFS. The Fund out-performed its custom benchmark for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2013 (one-year: 3.6% total return for the Fund versus 1.8% total return for the benchmark; three-year: 7.6% total return for the Fund versus 6.3% total return for the benchmark; five-year: 12.5% total return for the Fund versus 11.2% total return for the benchmark). Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.

In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.

 

72


Table of Contents

Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued

 

In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s common shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each lower than the Lipper expense group median.

The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to any comparable institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.

The Trustees considered that, as a closed-end fund, the Fund is unlikely to experience meaningful asset growth. As a result, the Trustees did not view the potential for realization of economies of scale as the Fund’s assets grow to be a material factor in their deliberations. The Trustees noted that they would consider economies of scale in the future in the event the Fund experiences significant asset growth, such as through an offering of preferred shares (which is not currently contemplated) or a material increase in the market value of the Fund’s portfolio securities.

The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.

After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.

In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.

The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative services provided to the Fund by MFS under agreements other than the investment advisory agreement. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action

 

73


Table of Contents

Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued

 

recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.

The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.

Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2014.

 

74


Table of Contents

PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION

MFS votes proxies on behalf of the fund pursuant to proxy voting policies and procedures that are available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.

Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.

QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE

The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:

Public Reference Room

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE, Room 1580

Washington, D.C. 20549

Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the Fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.

FURTHER INFORMATION

From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “Market Commentary” and “Announcements” sub sections in the “Market Outlooks” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Closed-End Funds” in the “Products” section of mfs.com.

FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (unaudited)

The fund will notify shareholders of amounts for use in preparing 2014 income tax forms in January 2015.

 

75


Table of Contents

rev. 3/11

 

 

FACTS

 

  WHAT DOES MFS DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION?   LOGO

 

Why?   Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do.

 

What?  

The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include:

 

 Social Security number and account balances

 Account transactions and transaction history

 Checking account information and wire transfer instructions

 

When you are no longer our customer, we continue to share your information as described in this notice.

 

How?   All financial companies need to share customers’ personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers’ personal information; the reasons MFS chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing.

 

Reasons we can share your
personal information
  Does MFS
share?
  Can you limit
this sharing?

For our everyday business purposes –

such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus

  Yes   No

For our marketing purposes –

to offer our products and services to you

  No   We don’t share
For joint marketing with other financial companies   No   We don’t share

For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes –

information about your transactions and experiences

  No   We don’t share

For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes –

information about your creditworthiness

  No   We don’t share
For nonaffiliates to market to you   No   We don’t share

 

Questions?   Call 800-225-2606 or go to mfs.com.

 

76


Table of Contents
Page 2  

 

 

Who we are
Who is providing this notice?   MFS Funds, MFS Investment Management, MFS Institutional Advisors, Inc., MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., MFS Heritage Trust Company, and MFS Service Center, Inc.

 

What we do
How does MFS protect my personal information?   To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include procedural, electronic, and physical safeguards for the protection of the personal information we collect about you.
How does MFS collect my personal information?  

We collect your personal information, for example, when you

 

 open an account or provide account information

 direct us to buy securities or direct us to sell your securities

 make a wire transfer

 

We also collect your personal information from others, such as credit bureaus, affiliates and other companies.

Why can’t I limit all sharing?  

Federal law gives you the right to limit only

 

 sharing for affiliates’ everyday business purposes – information about your creditworthiness

 affiliates from using your information to market to you

 sharing for nonaffiliates to market to you

 

State laws and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing.

 

Definitions
Affiliates  

Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.

 

 MFS does not share personal information with affiliates, except for everyday business purposes as described on page one of this notice.

Nonaffiliates  

Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.

 

 MFS does not share with nonaffiliates so they can market to you.

Joint Marketing  

A formal agreement between nonaffiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you.

 

 MFS doesnt jointly market.

 

 

Other important information
If you own an MFS product or receive an MFS service in the name of a third party such as a bank or broker-dealer, their privacy policy may apply to you instead of ours.

 

77


Table of Contents

LOGO

 

CONTACT US

TRANSFER AGENT, REGISTRAR, AND

DIVIDEND DISBURSING AGENT

CALL

1-800-637-2304

9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time

WRITE

Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

P.O. Box 43078

Providence, RI 02940-3078

 

New York Stock Exchange Symbol: MCR


Table of Contents
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.

The Registrant has adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and as defined in Form N-CSR that applies to the Registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer. During the period covered by this report, the Registrant has not amended any provision in its Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that relates to an element of the Code’s definitions enumerated in paragraph (b) of Item 2 of this Form N-CSR. During the period covered by this report, the Registrant did not grant a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from any provision of the Code.

A copy of the Code of Ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR.

 

ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

Messrs. Robert E. Butler, John P. Kavanaugh and Robert W. Uek and Mses. Maryanne L. Roepke and Laurie J. Thomsen, members of the Audit Committee, have been determined by the Board of Trustees in their reasonable business judgment to meet the definition of “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Form N-CSR. In addition, Messrs. Butler, Kavanaugh and Uek, and Mses Roepke and. Thomsen are “independent” members of the Audit Committee (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). The Securities and Exchange Commission has stated that the designation of a person as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 3 on the Form N-CSR does not impose on such a person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations or liability imposed on such person as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board of Trustees in the absence of such designation or identification.

 

ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Items 4(a) through 4(d) and 4(g):

The Board of Trustees has appointed Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) to serve as independent accountants to the Registrant (hereinafter the “Registrant” or the “Fund”). The tables below set forth the audit fees billed to the Fund as well as fees for non-audit services provided to the Fund and/or to the Fund’s investment adviser, Massachusetts Financial Services Company (“MFS”), and to various entities either controlling, controlled by, or under common control with MFS that provide ongoing services to the Fund (“MFS Related Entities”).

For the fiscal years ended November 30, 2014 and 2013, audit fees billed to the Fund by E&Y were as follows:

 

     Audit Fees  
     2014      2013  

Fees billed by E&Y:

     

MFS Charter Income Trust

     54,149         53,517   


Table of Contents

For the fiscal years ended November 30, 2014 and 2013, fees billed by E&Y for audit-related, tax and other services provided to the Fund and for audit-related, tax and other services provided to MFS and MFS Related Entities were as follows:

 

     Audit-Related  Fees1      Tax Fees2      All Other Fees3  
     2014      2013      2014      2013      2014      2013  

Fees billed by E&Y:

                 

To MFS Charter Income Trust

     10,843         10,714         10,102         9,978         0         0   
     Audit-Related  Fees1      Tax Fees2      All Other Fees3  
     2014      2013      2014      2013      2014      2013  

Fees billed by E&Y:

                 

To MFS and MFS Related Entities of MFS Charter Income Trust*

     0         0         0         0         0         0   

 

     Aggregate Fees for Non-audit
Services
 
     2014      2013  

Fees Billed by E&Y:

     

To MFS Charter Income Trust, MFS and MFS Related Entities#

     95,945         78,692   

 

* 

This amount reflects the fees billed to MFS and MFS Related Entities for non-audit services relating directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund (portions of which services also related to the operations and financial reporting of other funds within the MFS Funds complex).

# This amount reflects the aggregate fees billed by E&Y for non-audit services rendered to the Fund and for non-audit services rendered to MFS and the MFS Related Entities.
1

The fees included under “Audit-Related Fees” are fees related to assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements, but not reported under ‘‘Audit Fees,’’ including accounting consultations, agreed-upon procedure reports, attestation reports, comfort letters and internal control reviews.

2 

The fees included under “Tax Fees” are fees associated with tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, including services relating to the filing or amendment of federal, state or local income tax returns, regulated investment company qualification reviews and tax distribution and analysis.

3 

The fees under “All Other Fees” are fees for products and services provided by E&Y other than those reported under “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees”.

Item 4(e)(1):

Set forth below are the policies and procedures established by the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees relating to the pre-approval of audit and non-audit related services:

To the extent required by applicable law, pre-approval by the Audit Committee of the Board is needed for all audit and permissible non-audit services rendered to the Fund and all permissible non-audit services rendered to MFS or MFS Related Entities if the services relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant. Pre-approval is currently on an engagement-by-engagement basis. In the event pre-approval of such


Table of Contents

services is necessary between regular meetings of the Audit Committee and it is not practical to wait to seek pre-approval at the next regular meeting of the Audit Committee, pre-approval of such services may be referred to the Chair of the Audit Committee for approval; provided that the Chair may not pre-approve any individual engagement for such services exceeding $50,000 or multiple engagements for such services in the aggregate exceeding $100,000 between such regular meetings of the Audit Committee. Any engagement pre-approved by the Chair between regular meetings of the Audit Committee shall be presented for ratification by the entire Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

Item 4(e)(2):

None, or 0%, of the services relating to the Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees paid by the Fund and MFS and MFS Related Entities relating directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant disclosed above were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraphs (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (which permits audit committee approval after the start of the engagement with respect to services other than audit, review or attest services, if certain conditions are satisfied).

Item 4(f): Not applicable.

Item 4(h): The Registrant’s Audit Committee has considered whether the provision by a Registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm of non-audit services to MFS and MFS Related Entities that were not pre-approved by the Committee (because such services were provided prior to the effectiveness of SEC rules requiring pre-approval or because such services did not relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant) was compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm as the Registrant’s principal auditors.

 

ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.

The Registrant has an Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Robert E. Butler, John P. Kavanaugh, and Robert W. Uek and Mses. Maryanne L. Ropeke and Laurie J. Thomsen.

 

ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

A schedule of investments of the Registrant is included as part of the report to shareholders of the Registrant under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

 

ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.


Table of Contents

PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

February 1, 2014

Massachusetts Financial Services Company, MFS Institutional Advisors, Inc., MFS International (UK) Limited, MFS Heritage Trust Company, MFS Investment Management (Canada) Limited, MFS Investment Management Company (Lux) S.à r.l., MFS International Singapore Pte. Ltd., and MFS’ other subsidiaries that perform discretionary investment management activities (collectively, “MFS”) have adopted proxy voting policies and procedures, as set forth below (“MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures”), with respect to securities owned by the clients for which MFS serves as investment adviser and has the power to vote proxies, including the pooled investment vehicles sponsored by MFS (the “MFS Funds”). References to “clients” in these policies and procedures include the MFS Funds and other clients of MFS, such as funds organized offshore, sub-advised funds and separate account clients, to the extent these clients have delegated to MFS the responsibility to vote proxies on their behalf under the MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.

The MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures include:

 

  A. Voting Guidelines;

 

  B. Administrative Procedures;

 

  C Records Retention; and

 

  D. Reports.

A. VOTING GUIDELINES

 

1. General Policy; Potential Conflicts of Interest

MFS’ policy is that proxy voting decisions are made in what MFS believes to be the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients, and not in the interests of any other party or in MFS’ corporate interests, including interests such as the distribution of MFS Fund shares and institutional client relationships.

MFS reviews corporate governance issues and proxy voting matters that are presented for shareholder vote by either management or shareholders of public companies. Based on the overall principle that all votes cast by MFS on behalf of its clients must be in what MFS believes to be the best long-term economic interests of such clients, MFS has adopted proxy voting guidelines, set forth below, that govern how MFS generally will vote on specific matters presented for shareholder vote.


Table of Contents

As a general matter, MFS votes consistently on similar proxy proposals across all shareholder meetings. However, some proxy proposals, such as certain excessive executive compensation, environmental, social and governance matters, are analyzed on a case-by-case basis in light of all the relevant facts and circumstances of the proposal. Therefore, MFS may vote similar proposals differently at different shareholder meetings based on the specific facts and circumstances of the issuer or the terms of the proposal. In addition, MFS also reserves the right to override the guidelines with respect to a particular proxy proposal when such an override is, in MFS’ best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients.

MFS also generally votes consistently on the same matter when securities of an issuer are held by multiple client accounts, unless MFS has received explicit voting instructions to vote differently from a client for its own account. From time to time, MFS may also receive comments on the MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures from its clients. These comments are carefully considered by MFS when it reviews these guidelines and revises them as appropriate.

These policies and procedures are intended to address any potential material conflicts of interest on the part of MFS or its subsidiaries that are likely to arise in connection with the voting of proxies on behalf of MFS’ clients. If such potential material conflicts of interest do arise, MFS will analyze, document and report on such potential material conflicts of interest (see Sections B.2 and D below), and shall ultimately vote the relevant proxies in what MFS believes to be the best long-term economic interests of its clients. The MFS Proxy Voting Committee is responsible for monitoring and reporting with respect to such potential material conflicts of interest.

MFS is also a signatory to the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment. In developing these guidelines, MFS considered environmental, social and corporate governance issues in light of MFS’ fiduciary obligation to vote proxies in the best long-term economic interest of its clients.

 

2. MFS’ Policy on Specific Issues

Election of Directors

MFS believes that good governance should be based on a board with at least a simple majority of directors who are “independent” of management, and whose key committees (e.g., compensation, nominating, and audit committees) consist entirely of “independent” directors. While MFS generally supports the board’s nominees in uncontested or non-contentious elections, we will not support a nominee to a board of a U.S. issuer (or issuer listed on a U.S. exchange) if, as a


Table of Contents

result of such nominee being elected to the board, the board would consist of a simple majority of members who are not “independent” or, alternatively, the compensation, nominating (including instances in which the full board serves as the compensation or nominating committee) or audit committees would include members who are not “independent.”

MFS will also not support a nominee to a board if we can determine that he or she attended less than 75% of the board and/or relevant committee meetings in the previous year without a valid reason stated in the proxy materials or other company communications. In addition, MFS may not support some or all nominees standing for re-election to a board if we can determine: (1) the board or its compensation committee has re-priced or exchanged underwater stock options since the last annual meeting of shareholders and without shareholder approval; (2) the board or relevant committee has not taken adequately responsive action to an issue that received majority support or opposition from shareholders; (3) the board has implemented a poison pill without shareholder approval since the last annual meeting and such poison pill is not on the subsequent shareholder meeting’s agenda, (including those related to net-operating loss carryforwards); (4) the board or relevant committee has failed to adequately oversee risk by allowing the hedging and/or significant pledging of company shares by executives; or (5) there are governance concerns with a director or issuer.

MFS may not support certain board nominees of U.S. issuers under certain circumstances where MFS deems compensation to be egregious due to pay-for-performance issues and/or poor pay practices. Please see the section below titled “MFS’ Policy on Specific Issues—Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation” for further details.

MFS evaluates a contested or contentious election of directors on a case-by-case basis considering the long-term financial performance of the company relative to its industry, management’s track record, the qualifications of all nominees, and an evaluation of what each side is offering shareholders.

Majority Voting and Director Elections

MFS votes for reasonably crafted proposals calling for directors to be elected with an affirmative majority of votes cast and/or the elimination of the plurality standard for electing directors (including binding resolutions requesting that the board amend the company’s bylaws), provided the proposal includes a carve-out for a plurality voting standard when there are more director nominees than board seats (e.g., contested elections) (“Majority Vote Proposals”).

Classified Boards

MFS generally supports proposals to declassify a board (i.e.; a board in which only one-third of board members is elected each year) for all issuers other than for certain closed-end investment companies. MFS generally opposes proposals to classify a board for issuers other than for certain closed-end investment companies.


Table of Contents

Proxy Access

MFS believes that the ability of qualifying shareholders to nominate a certain number of directors on the company’s proxy statement (“Proxy Access”) may have corporate governance benefits. However, such potential benefits must be balanced by its potential misuse by shareholders. Therefore, we support Proxy Access proposals at U.S. issuers that establish an ownership criteria of 3% of the company held continuously for a period of 3 years. MFS analyzes all other proposals seeking Proxy Access on a case-by-case basis. In its analysis, MFS will consider the proposed ownership criteria for qualifying shareholders (such as ownership threshold and holding period) as well as the proponent’s rationale for seeking Proxy Access.

Stock Plans

MFS opposes stock option programs and restricted stock plans that provide unduly generous compensation for officers, directors or employees, or that could result in excessive dilution to other shareholders. As a general guideline, MFS votes against restricted stock, stock option, non-employee director, omnibus stock plans and any other stock plan if all such plans for a particular company involve potential dilution, in the aggregate, of more than 15%. However, MFS will also vote against stock plans that involve potential dilution, in aggregate, of more than 10% at U.S. issuers that are listed in the Standard and Poor’s 100 index as of December 31 of the previous year. In the cases where a stock plan amendment is seeking qualitative changes and not additional shares, MFS will vote its shares on a case-by-case basis.


Table of Contents

MFS also opposes stock option programs that allow the board or the compensation committee to re-price underwater options or to automatically replenish shares without shareholder approval. MFS also votes against stock option programs for officers, employees or non-employee directors that do not require an investment by the optionee, that give “free rides” on the stock price, or that permit grants of stock options with an exercise price below fair market value on the date the options are granted. MFS will consider proposals to exchange existing options for newly issued options, restricted stock or cash on a case-by-case basis, taking into account certain factors, including, but not limited to, whether there is a reasonable value-for-value exchange and whether senior executives are excluded from participating in the exchange.

MFS supports the use of a broad-based employee stock purchase plans to increase company stock ownership by employees, provided that shares purchased under the plan are acquired for no less than 85% of their market value and do not result in excessive dilution.

Shareholder Proposals on Executive Compensation

MFS believes that competitive compensation packages are necessary to attract, motivate and retain executives. However, MFS also recognizes that certain executive compensation practices can be “excessive” and not in the best, long-term economic interest of a company’s shareholders. We believe that the election of an issuer’s board of directors (as outlined above), votes on stock plans (as outlined above) and advisory votes on pay (as outlined below) are typically the most effective mechanisms to express our view on a company’s compensation practices.

MFS generally opposes shareholder proposals that seek to set rigid restrictions on executive compensation as MFS believes that compensation committees should retain some flexibility to determine the appropriate pay package for executives. Although we support linking executive stock option grants to a company’s performance, MFS also opposes shareholder proposals that mandate a link of performance-based pay to a specific metric. MFS generally supports reasonably crafted shareholder proposals that (i) require the issuer to adopt a policy to recover the portion of performance-based bonuses and awards paid to senior executives that were not earned based upon a significant negative restatement of earnings unless the company already has adopted a satisfactory policy on the matter, (ii) expressly prohibit the backdating of stock options, and (iii) prohibit the acceleration of vesting of equity awards upon a broad definition of a “change-in-control” (e.g.; single or modified single-trigger).


Table of Contents

Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

MFS will analyze advisory votes on executive compensation on a case-by-case basis. MFS will vote against an advisory vote on executive compensation if MFS determines that the issuer has adopted excessive executive compensation practices and will vote in favor of an advisory vote on executive compensation if MFS has not determined that the issuer has adopted excessive executive compensation practices. Examples of excessive executive compensation practices may include, but are not limited to, a pay-for-performance disconnect, employment contract terms such as guaranteed bonus provisions, unwarranted pension payouts, backdated stock options, overly generous hiring bonuses for chief executive officers, unnecessary perquisites, or the potential reimbursement of excise taxes to an executive in regards to a severance package. In cases where MFS (i) votes against consecutive advisory pay votes, or (ii) determines that a particularly egregious excessive executive compensation practice has occurred, then MFS may also vote against certain or all board nominees. MFS may also vote against certain or all board nominees if an advisory pay vote for a U.S. issuer is not on the agenda, or the company has not implemented the advisory vote frequency supported by a plurality/ majority of shareholders.

MFS generally supports proposals to include an advisory shareholder vote on an issuer’s executive compensation practices on an annual basis.

“Golden Parachutes”

From time to time, MFS may evaluate a separate, advisory vote on severance packages or “golden parachutes” to certain executives at the same time as a vote on a proposed merger or acquisition. MFS will support an advisory vote on a severance package on a on a case-by-case basis, and MFS may vote against the severance package regardless of whether MFS supports the proposed merger or acquisition.

Shareholders of companies may also submit proxy proposals that would require shareholder approval of severance packages for executive officers that exceed certain predetermined thresholds. MFS votes in favor of such shareholder proposals when they would require shareholder approval of any severance package for an executive officer that exceeds a certain multiple of such officer’s annual compensation that is not determined in MFS’ judgment to be excessive.

Anti-Takeover Measures

In general, MFS votes against any measure that inhibits capital appreciation in a stock, including proposals that protect management from action by shareholders. These types of proposals take many forms, ranging from “poison pills” and “shark repellents” to super-majority requirements.


Table of Contents

MFS generally votes for proposals to rescind existing “poison pills” and proposals that would require shareholder approval to adopt prospective “poison pills,” unless the company already has adopted a clearly satisfactory policy on the matter. MFS may consider the adoption of a prospective “poison pill” or the continuation of an existing “poison pill” if we can determine that the following two conditions are met: (1) the “poison pill” allows MFS clients to hold an aggregate position of up to 15% of a company’s total voting securities (and of any class of voting securities); and (2) either (a) the “poison pill” has a term of not longer than five years, provided that MFS will consider voting in favor of the “poison pill” if the term does not exceed seven years and the “poison pill” is linked to a business strategy or purpose that MFS believes is likely to result in greater value for shareholders; or (b) the terms of the “poison pill” allow MFS clients the opportunity to accept a fairly structured and attractively priced tender offer (e.g. a “chewable poison pill” that automatically dissolves in the event of an all cash, all shares tender offer at a premium price). MFS will also consider on a case-by-case basis proposals designed to prevent tenders which are disadvantageous to shareholders such as tenders at below market prices and tenders for substantially less than all shares of an issuer.

MFS will consider any poison pills designed to protect a company’s net-operating loss carryforwards on a case-by-case basis, weighing the accounting and tax benefits of such a pill against the risk of deterring future acquisition candidates.

Reincorporation and Reorganization Proposals

When presented with a proposal to reincorporate a company under the laws of a different state, or to effect some other type of corporate reorganization, MFS considers the underlying purpose and ultimate effect of such a proposal in determining whether or not to support such a measure. MFS generally votes with management in regards to these types of proposals, however, if MFS believes the proposal is in the best long-term economic interests of its clients, then MFS may vote against management (e.g. the intent or effect would be to create additional inappropriate impediments to possible acquisitions or takeovers).

Issuance of Stock

There are many legitimate reasons for the issuance of stock. Nevertheless, as noted above under “Stock Plans,” when a stock option plan (either individually or when aggregated with other plans of the same company) would substantially dilute the existing equity (e.g. by approximately 10-15% as described above), MFS generally votes against the plan. In addition, MFS typically votes against proposals where management is asking for authorization to issue common or preferred stock with no reason stated (a “blank check”) because the unexplained authorization could work as a potential anti-takeover device. MFS may also vote against the authorization or issuance of common or preferred stock if MFS determines that the requested authorization is excessive or not warranted.


Table of Contents

Repurchase Programs

MFS supports proposals to institute share repurchase plans in which all shareholders have the opportunity to participate on an equal basis. Such plans may include a company acquiring its own shares on the open market, or a company making a tender offer to its own shareholders.

Cumulative Voting

MFS opposes proposals that seek to introduce cumulative voting and for proposals that seek to eliminate cumulative voting. In either case, MFS will consider whether cumulative voting is likely to enhance the interests of MFS’ clients as minority shareholders.

Written Consent and Special Meetings

The right to call a special meeting or act by written consent can be a powerful tool for shareholders. As such, MFS supports proposals requesting the right for shareholders who hold at least 10% of the issuer’s outstanding stock to call a special meeting. MFS also supports proposals requesting the right for shareholders to act by written consent.

Independent Auditors

MFS believes that the appointment of auditors for U.S. issuers is best left to the board of directors of the company and therefore supports the ratification of the board’s selection of an auditor for the company. Some shareholder groups have submitted proposals to limit the non-audit activities of a company’s audit firm or prohibit any non-audit services by a company’s auditors to that company. MFS opposes proposals recommending the prohibition or limitation of the performance of non-audit services by an auditor, and proposals recommending the removal of a company’s auditor due to the performance of non-audit work for the company by its auditor. MFS believes that the board, or its audit committee, should have the discretion to hire the company’s auditor for specific pieces of non-audit work in the limited situations permitted under current law.

Other Business

MFS generally votes against “other business” proposals as the content of any such matter is not known at the time of our vote.


Table of Contents

Adjourn Shareholder Meeting

MFS generally supports proposals to adjourn a shareholder meeting if we support the other ballot items on the meeting’s agenda. MFS generally votes against proposals to adjourn a meeting if we do not support the other ballot items on the meeting’s agenda.

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Issues

MFS believes that a company’s ESG practices may have an impact on the company’s long-term economic financial performance and will generally support proposals relating to ESG issues that MFS believes are in the best long-term economic interest of the company’s shareholders. For those ESG proposals for which a specific policy has not been adopted, MFS considers such ESG proposals on a case-by-case basis. As a result, it may vote similar proposals differently at various shareholder meetings based on the specific facts and circumstances of such proposal.

MFS generally supports proposals that seek to remove governance structures that insulate management from shareholders (i.e., anti-takeover measures) or that seek to enhance shareholder rights. Many of these governance-related issues, including compensation issues, are outlined within the context of the above guidelines. In addition, MFS typically supports proposals that require an issuer to reimburse successful dissident shareholders (who are not seeking control of the company) for reasonable expenses that such dissident incurred in soliciting an alternative slate of director candidates. MFS also generally supports reasonably crafted shareholder proposals requesting increased disclosure around the company’s use of collateral in derivatives trading. MFS typically supports proposals for an independent board chairperson. However, we may not support such proposals if we determine there to be an appropriate and effective counter-balancing leadership structure in place (e.g.; a strong, independent lead director with an appropriate level of powers and duties). For any governance-related proposal for which an explicit guideline is not provided above, MFS will consider such proposals on a case-by-case basis and will support such proposals if MFS believes that it is in the best long-term economic interest of the company’s shareholders.

MFS generally supports proposals that request disclosure on the impact of environmental issues on the company’s operations, sales, and capital investments. However, MFS may not support such proposals based on the facts and circumstances surrounding a specific proposal, including, but not limited to, whether (i) the proposal is unduly costly, restrictive, or burdensome, (ii) the company already provides publicly-available information that is sufficient to enable shareholders to evaluate the potential opportunities and risks that environmental matters pose to the company’s operations, sales and capital investments, or (iii) the proposal seeks a level of disclosure that exceeds that provided by the company’s industry peers. MFS will analyze all other environmental proposals on a case-by-case basis and will support such proposals if MFS believes such proposal is in the best long-term economic interest of the company’s shareholders.


Table of Contents

MFS will analyze social proposals on a case-by-case basis. MFS will support such proposals if MFS believes that such proposal is in the best long-term economic interest of the company’s shareholders. Generally, MFS will support shareholder proposals that (i) seek to amend a company’s equal employment opportunity policy to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; and (ii) request additional disclosure regarding a company’s political contributions (including trade organizations and lobbying activity) (unless the company already provides publicly-available information that is sufficient to enable shareholders to evaluate the potential opportunities and risks that such contributions pose to the company’s operations, sales and capital investments).

The laws of various states or countries may regulate how the interests of certain clients subject to those laws (e.g. state pension plans) are voted with respect to social issues. Thus, it may be necessary to cast ballots differently for certain clients than MFS might normally do for other clients.

Foreign Issuers

MFS generally supports the election of a director nominee standing for re-election in uncontested or non-contentious elections unless it can be determined that (1) he or she failed to attend at least 75% of the board and/or relevant committee meetings in the previous year without a valid reason given in the proxy materials; (2) since the last annual meeting of shareholders and without shareholder approval, the board or its compensation committee has re-priced underwater stock options; or (3) since the last annual meeting, the board has either implemented a poison pill without shareholder approval or has not taken responsive action to a majority shareholder approved resolution recommending that the “poison pill” be rescinded. In such circumstances, we will vote against director nominee(s). Also, certain markets outside of the U.S. have adopted best practice guidelines relating to corporate governance matters (e.g. the United Kingdom’s Corporate Governance Code). Many of these guidelines operate on a “comply or explain” basis. As such, MFS will evaluate any explanations by companies relating to their compliance with a particular corporate governance guideline on a case-by-case basis and may vote against the board nominees or other relevant ballot item if such explanation is not satisfactory. In some circumstances, MFS may submit a vote to abstain from certain director nominees or the relevant ballot items if we have concerns with the nominee or ballot item, but do not believe these concerns rise to the level where a vote against is warranted.

MFS generally supports the election of auditors, but may determine to vote against the election of a statutory auditor in certain markets if MFS reasonably believes that the statutory auditor is not truly independent.


Table of Contents

Some international markets have also adopted mandatory requirements for all companies to hold shareholder votes on executive compensation. MFS will vote against such proposals if MFS determines that a company’s executive compensation practices are excessive, considering such factors as the specific market’s best practices that seek to maintain appropriate pay-for-performance alignment and to create long-term shareholder value. We may alternatively submit an abstention vote on such proposals in circumstances where our executive compensation concerns are not as severe.

Many other items on foreign proxies involve repetitive, non-controversial matters that are mandated by local law. Accordingly, the items that are generally deemed routine and which do not require the exercise of judgment under these guidelines (and therefore voted with management) for foreign issuers include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) receiving financial statements or other reports from the board; (ii) approval of declarations of dividends; (iii) appointment of shareholders to sign board meeting minutes; (iv) discharge of management and supervisory boards; and (v) approval of share repurchase programs (absent any anti-takeover or other concerns). MFS will evaluate all other items on proxies for foreign companies in the context of the guidelines described above, but will generally vote against an item if there is not sufficient information disclosed in order to make an informed voting decision. For any ballot item where MFS wishes to express a more moderate level of concern than a vote of against, we will cast a vote to abstain.

In accordance with local law or business practices, some foreign companies or custodians prevent the sales of shares that have been voted for a certain period beginning prior to the shareholder meeting and ending on the day following the meeting (“share blocking”). Depending on the country in which a company is domiciled, the blocking period may begin a stated number of days prior or subsequent to the meeting (e.g. one, three or five days) or on a date established by the company. While practices vary, in many countries the block period can be continued for a longer period if the shareholder meeting is adjourned and postponed to a later date. Similarly, practices vary widely as to the ability of a shareholder to have the “block” restriction lifted early (e.g. in some countries shares generally can be “unblocked” up to two days prior to the meeting whereas in other countries the removal of the block appears to be discretionary with the issuer’s transfer agent). Due to these restrictions, MFS must balance the benefits to its clients of voting proxies against the potentially serious portfolio management consequences of a reduced flexibility to sell the underlying shares at the most advantageous time. For companies in countries with share blocking periods or in markets where some custodians may block shares, the disadvantage of being unable to sell the stock regardless of changing conditions generally outweighs the advantages of voting at the shareholder meeting for routine items. Accordingly, MFS will not vote those proxies in the absence of an unusual, significant vote that outweighs the disadvantage of being unable to sell the stock.


Table of Contents

In limited circumstances, other market specific impediments to voting shares may limit our ability to cast votes, including, but not limited to, late delivery of proxy materials, untimely vote cut-off dates, power of attorney and share re-registration requirements, or any other unusual voting requirements. In these limited instances, MFS votes securities on a best efforts basis in the context of the guidelines described above.

 

B. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

 

  1. MFS Proxy Voting Committee

The administration of these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures is overseen by the MFS Proxy Voting Committee, which includes senior personnel from the MFS Legal and Global Investment Support Departments. The Proxy Voting Committee does not include individuals whose primary duties relate to client relationship management, marketing, or sales. The MFS Proxy Voting Committee:

 

  a. Reviews these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures at least annually and recommends any amendments considered to be necessary or advisable;

 

  b. Determines whether any potential material conflict of interest exists with respect to instances in which MFS (i) seeks to override these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures; (ii) votes on ballot items not governed by these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures; (iii) evaluates an excessive executive compensation issue in relation to the election of directors; or (iv) requests a vote recommendation from an MFS portfolio manager or investment analyst (e.g. mergers and acquisitions); and

 

  c. Considers special proxy issues as they may arise from time to time.

 

  2. Potential Conflicts of Interest

The MFS Proxy Voting Committee is responsible for monitoring potential material conflicts of interest on the part of MFS or its subsidiaries that could arise in connection with the voting of proxies on behalf of MFS’ clients. Due to the client focus of our investment management business, we believe that the potential for actual material conflict of interest issues is small. Nonetheless, we have developed precautions to assure that all proxy votes are cast in the best long-term economic interest of shareholders.1 Other MFS internal policies require all MFS employees to avoid actual and potential conflicts of interests between personal activities and

 

 

1 

For clarification purposes, note that MFS votes in what we believe to be the best, long-term economic interest of our clients entitled to vote at the shareholder meeting, regardless of whether other MFS clients hold “short” positions in the same issuer.


Table of Contents

MFS’ client activities. If an employee (including investment professionals) identifies an actual or potential conflict of interest with respect to any voting decision (including the ownership of securities in their individual portfolio), then that employee must recuse himself/herself from participating in the voting process. Any significant attempt by an employee of MFS or its subsidiaries to unduly influence MFS’ voting on a particular proxy matter should also be reported to the MFS Proxy Voting Committee.

In cases where proxies are voted in accordance with these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures, no material conflict of interest will be deemed to exist. In cases where (i) MFS is considering overriding these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures, (ii) matters presented for vote are not governed by these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures, (iii) MFS evaluates a potentially excessive executive compensation issue in relation to the election of directors or advisory pay or severance package vote, (iv) a vote recommendation is requested from an MFS portfolio manager or investment analyst (e.g. mergers and acquisitions); or (v) MFS evaluates a director nominee who also serves as a director of the MFS Funds (collectively, “Non-Standard Votes”); the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will follow these procedures:

 

  a. Compare the name of the issuer of such proxy against a list of significant current (i) distributors of MFS Fund shares, and (ii) MFS institutional clients (the “MFS Significant Distributor and Client List”);

 

  b. If the name of the issuer does not appear on the MFS Significant Distributor and Client List, then no material conflict of interest will be deemed to exist, and the proxy will be voted as otherwise determined by the MFS Proxy Voting Committee;

 

  c. If the name of the issuer appears on the MFS Significant Distributor and Client List, then the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will be apprised of that fact and each member of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will carefully evaluate the proposed vote in order to ensure that the proxy ultimately is voted in what MFS believes to be the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients, and not in MFS’ corporate interests; and

 

  d. For all potential material conflicts of interest identified under clause (c) above, the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will document: the name of the issuer, the issuer’s relationship to MFS, the analysis of the matters submitted for proxy vote, the votes as to be cast and the reasons why the MFS Proxy Voting Committee determined that the votes were cast in the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients, and not in MFS’ corporate interests. A copy of the foregoing documentation will be provided to MFS’ Conflicts Officer.


Table of Contents

The members of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee are responsible for creating and maintaining the MFS Significant Distributor and Client List, in consultation with MFS’ distribution and institutional business units. The MFS Significant Distributor and Client List will be reviewed and updated periodically, as appropriate.

If an MFS client has the right to vote on a matter submitted to shareholders by Sun Life Financial, Inc. or any of its affiliates (collectively “Sun Life”), MFS will cast a vote on behalf of such MFS client pursuant to the recommendations of Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc.’s (“ISS”) benchmark policy, or as required by law.

Except as described in the MFS Fund’s prospectus, from time to time, certain MFS Funds (the “top tier fund”) may own shares of other MFS Funds (the “underlying fund”). If an underlying fund submits a matter to a shareholder vote, the top tier fund will generally vote its shares in the same proportion as the other shareholders of the underlying fund. If there are no other shareholders in the underlying fund, the top tier fund will vote in what MFS believes to be in the top tier fund’s best long-term economic interest. If an MFS client has the right to vote on a matter submitted to shareholders by a pooled investment vehicle advised by MFS, MFS will cast a vote on behalf of such MFS client in the same proportion as the other shareholders of the pooled investment vehicle.

 

  3. Gathering Proxies

Most proxies received by MFS and its clients originate at Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”). Broadridge and other service providers, on behalf of custodians, send proxy related material to the record holders of the shares beneficially owned by MFS’ clients, usually to the client’s proxy voting administrator or, less commonly, to the client itself. This material will include proxy ballots reflecting the shareholdings of Funds and of clients on the record dates for such shareholder meetings, as well as proxy materials with the issuer’s explanation of the items to be voted upon.

MFS, on behalf of itself and certain of its clients (including the MFS Funds) has entered into an agreement with an independent proxy administration firm pursuant to which the proxy administration firm performs various proxy vote related administrative services such as vote processing and recordkeeping functions. Except as noted below, the proxy administration firm for MFS and its clients, including the MFS Funds, is ISS. The proxy administration firm for MFS Development Funds, LLC is Glass, Lewis & Co., Inc. (“Glass Lewis”; Glass Lewis and ISS are each hereinafter referred to as the “Proxy Administrator”).


Table of Contents

The Proxy Administrator receives proxy statements and proxy ballots directly or indirectly from various custodians, logs these materials into its database and matches upcoming meetings with MFS Fund and client portfolio holdings, which are input into the Proxy Administrator’s system by an MFS holdings data-feed. Through the use of the Proxy Administrator system, ballots and proxy material summaries for all upcoming shareholders’ meetings are available on-line to certain MFS employees and members of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee.

It is the responsibility of the Proxy Administrator and MFS to monitor the receipt of ballots. When proxy ballots and materials for clients are received by the Proxy Administrator, they are input into the Proxy Administrator’s on-line system. The Proxy Administrator then reconciles a list of all MFS accounts that hold shares of a company’s stock and the number of shares held on the record date by these accounts with the Proxy Administrator’s list of any upcoming shareholder’s meeting of that company. If a proxy ballot has not been received, the Proxy Administrator contacts the custodian requesting the reason as to why a ballot has not been received.

 

  4. Analyzing Proxies

Proxies are voted in accordance with these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures. The Proxy Administrator, at the prior direction of MFS, automatically votes all proxy matters that do not require the particular exercise of discretion or judgment with respect to these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures as determined by MFS. With respect to proxy matters that require the particular exercise of discretion or judgment, the MFS Proxy Voting Committee considers and votes on those proxy matters. MFS also receives research and recommendations from the Proxy Administrator which it may take into account in deciding how to vote. MFS uses the research of ISS to identify (i) circumstances in which a board may have approved excessive executive compensation, (ii) environmental and social proposals that warrant further consideration or (iii) circumstances in which a non-U.S. company is not in compliance with local governance or compensation best practices. In those situations where the only MFS fund that is eligible to vote at a shareholder meeting has Glass Lewis as its Proxy Administrator, then we will utilize research from Glass Lewis to identify such issues. MFS analyzes such issues independently and does not necessarily vote with the ISS or Glass Lewis recommendations on these issues. MFS may also use other research tools in order to identify the circumstances described above. Representatives of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee review, as appropriate, votes cast to ensure conformity with these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.


Table of Contents

As a general matter, portfolio managers and investment analysts have little involvement in most votes taken by MFS. This is designed to promote consistency in the application of MFS’ voting guidelines, to promote consistency in voting on the same or similar issues (for the same or for multiple issuers) across all client accounts, and to minimize the potential that proxy solicitors, issuers, or third parties might attempt to exert inappropriate influence on the vote. In limited types of votes (e.g. mergers and acquisitions, capitalization matters, potentially excessive executive compensation issues, or shareholder proposals relating to environmental and social issues), a representative of MFS Proxy Voting Committee may consult with or seek recommendations from MFS portfolio managers or investment analysts.2 However, the MFS Proxy Voting Committee would ultimately determine the manner in which all proxies are voted.

As noted above, MFS reserves the right to override the guidelines when such an override is, in MFS’ best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients. Any such override of the guidelines shall be analyzed, documented and reported in accordance with the procedures set forth in these policies.

 

  5. Voting Proxies

In accordance with its contract with MFS, the Proxy Administrator also generates a variety of reports for the MFS Proxy Voting Committee, and makes available on-line various other types of information so that the MFS Proxy Voting Committee or proxy team may review and monitor the votes cast by the Proxy Administrator on behalf of MFS’ clients.

For those markets that utilize a “record date” to determine which shareholders are eligible to vote, MFS generally will vote all eligible shares pursuant to these guidelines regardless of whether all (or a portion of) the shares held by our clients have been sold prior to the meeting date.

 

  6. Securities Lending

From time to time, the MFS Funds or other pooled investment vehicles sponsored by MFS may participate in a securities lending program. In the event MFS or its agent receives timely notice of a shareholder meeting for a U.S. security, MFS and its agent will attempt to recall any securities on loan before the meeting’s record date so that MFS will be entitled to vote these shares. However, there may be instances in which MFS is unable to timely recall securities on loan for a U.S. security, in which cases MFS will not be able to vote these shares. MFS will report to the appropriate board of the MFS Funds those instances in which MFS is not able to timely recall the loaned securities. MFS generally does not

 

2 

From time to time, due to travel schedules and other commitments, an appropriate portfolio manager or research analyst may not be available to provide a vote recommendation. If such a recommendation cannot be obtained within a reasonable time prior to the cut-off date of the shareholder meeting, the MFS Proxy Voting Committee may determine to abstain from voting.


Table of Contents

recall non-U.S. securities on loan because there may be insufficient advance notice of proxy materials, record dates, or vote cut-off dates to allow MFS to timely recall the shares in certain markets on an automated basis. As a result, non-U.S. securities that are on loan will not generally be voted. If MFS receives timely notice of what MFS determines to be an unusual, significant vote for a non-U.S. security whereas MFS shares are on loan, and determines that voting is in the best long-term economic interest of shareholders, then MFS will attempt to timely recall the loaned shares.

 

  7. Engagement

The MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures are available on www.mfs.com and may be accessed by both MFS’ clients and the companies in which MFS’ clients invest. From time to time, MFS may determine that it is appropriate and beneficial for representatives from the MFS Proxy Voting Committee to engage in a dialogue or written communication with a company or other shareholders regarding certain matters on the company’s proxy statement that are of concern to shareholders, including environmental, social and governance matters. A company or shareholder may also seek to engage with representatives of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee in advance of the company’s formal proxy solicitation to review issues more generally or gauge support for certain contemplated proposals.

 

C. RECORDS RETENTION

MFS will retain copies of these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures in effect from time to time and will retain all proxy voting reports submitted to the Board of Trustees of the MFS Funds for the period required by applicable law. Proxy solicitation materials, including electronic versions of the proxy ballots completed by representatives of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee, together with their respective notes and comments, are maintained in an electronic format by the Proxy Administrator and are accessible on-line by the MFS Proxy Voting Committee. All proxy voting materials and supporting documentation, including records generated by the Proxy Administrator’s system as to proxies processed, including the dates when proxy ballots were received and submitted, and the votes on each company’s proxy issues, are retained as required by applicable law.

 

D. REPORTS

U.S. Registered MFS Funds

MFS publicly discloses the proxy voting records of the U.S. registered MFS Funds on a quarterly basis. MFS will also report the results of its voting to the Board of Trustees of the U.S. registered MFS Funds. These reports will include: (i) a summary of how votes were cast (including advisory votes on pay and “golden


Table of Contents

parachutes”) ; (ii) a summary of votes against management’s recommendation; (iii) a review of situations where MFS did not vote in accordance with the guidelines and the rationale therefore; (iv) a review of the procedures used by MFS to identify material conflicts of interest and any matters identified as a material conflict of interest; (v) a review of these policies and the guidelines; (vi) a review of our proxy engagement activity; (vii) a report and impact assessment of instances in which the recall of loaned securities of a U.S. issuer was unsuccessful; and (viii) as necessary or appropriate, any proposed modifications thereto to reflect new developments in corporate governance and other issues. Based on these reviews, the Trustees of the U.S. registered MFS Funds will consider possible modifications to these policies to the extent necessary or advisable.

Other MFS Clients

MFS may publicly disclose the proxy voting records of certain other clients (including certain MFS Funds) or the votes it casts with respect to certain matters as required by law. A report can also be printed by MFS for each client who has requested that MFS furnish a record of votes cast. The report specifies the proxy issues which have been voted for the client during the year and the position taken with respect to each issue and, upon request, may identify situations where MFS did not vote in accordance with the MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.

Except as described above, MFS generally will not divulge actual voting practices to any party other than the client or its representatives because we consider that information to be confidential and proprietary to the client. However, as noted above, MFS may determine that it is appropriate and beneficial to engage in a dialogue with a company regarding certain matters. During such dialogue with the company, MFS may disclose the vote it intends to cast in order to potentially effect positive change at a company in regards to environmental, social or governance issues.

 

ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Portfolio Manager(s)

Information regarding the portfolio manager(s) of the MFS Charter Income Trust (the “Fund”) is set forth below. Each portfolio manager is primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund.


Table of Contents

Portfolio Manager

  

Primary Role

  

Since

  

Title and Five Year History

Richard O. Hawkins    Lead Portfolio Manager    2004    Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment area of MFS since 1988.
William J. Adams    Lower Quality Debt Instruments Portfolio Manager    2011    Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment area of MFS since 2009, Credit Analyst at MFS from 1997 to 2005.
Ward Brown    Emerging Markets Debt Instruments Portfolio Manager    2012    Investment Officer of MFS; Employed in the investment area of MFS since 2005
David P. Cole    Lower Quality Debt Instruments Portfolio Manager    2006    Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment area of MFS since 2004.
Pilar Gomez-Bravo    Investment Grade Debt Instruments Portfolio Manager    2013    Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment area of MFS since 2013; Imperial Capital from May 2012 to March 2013; Negentropy Capital from June 2011 to April 2012; Marengo Asset Management from June 2010 to April 2011; Neuberger Berman from June 2006 to May 2010
Joshua P. Marston    Structured Securities Portfolio Manager    2012    Investment Officer of MFS; Employed in the investment area of MFS since 1999
Robert D. Persons    Investment Grade Debt Instruments Portfolio Manager    2013    Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment area of MFS since 2000
Matthew W. Ryan    Emerging Markets Debt Instruments Portfolio Manager    2004    Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment area of MFS since 1997.
Erik S. Weisman    Sovereign Debt Instruments Portfolio Manager    2012    Investment Officer of MFS; Employed in the investment area of MFS since 2002

Compensation

Portfolio manager compensation is reviewed annually. As of December 31, 2013, portfolio manager total cash compensation is a combination of base salary and performance bonus:

Base Salary – Base salary represents a smaller percentage of portfolio manager total cash compensation than performance bonus.

Performance Bonus – Generally, the performance bonus represents more than a majority of portfolio manager total cash compensation.

The performance bonus is based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative factors, generally with more weight given to the former and less weight given to the latter.

The quantitative portion is based on the pre-tax performance of assets managed by the portfolio manager over one-, three-, and five-year periods relative to peer group universes and/or indices (“benchmarks”). As of December 31, 2013, the following benchmarks were used to measure the following portfolio manager’s performance for the Fund:

 

Fund

  

Portfolio Manager

  

Benchmark(s)

MFS Charter Income Trust    Richard O. Hawkins   

Citigroup World Government Bond Non-Dollar Hedged Index JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global

Barclay’s U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index Barclay’s U.S. Credit Bond Index

Barclay’s U.S. Government/Mortgage Bond Index

   William J. Adams    Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index
   Ward Brown    JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global
   David P. Cole    Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index
   Pilar Gomez-Bravo    Barclays Global Credit Index
   Joshua P. Marston    Barclays U.S. Government/Mortgage Index
   Robert D. Persons    Barclays Global Credit Index
   Matthew W. Ryan    JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global
   Erik S. Weisman    Citigroup World Government Bond Non-Dollar Hedged Index


Table of Contents

Additional or different benchmarks, including versions of indices, custom indices, and linked indices that combine performance of different indices for different portions of the time period, may also be used. Primary weight is given to portfolio performance over a three-year time period with lesser consideration given to portfolio performance over one- and five-year periods (adjusted as appropriate if the portfolio manager has served for less than five years).

The qualitative portion is based on the results of an annual internal peer review process (conducted by other portfolio managers, analysts, and traders) and management’s assessment of overall portfolio manager contributions to investor relations and the investment process (distinct from fund and other account performance). This performance bonus may be in the form of cash and/or a deferred cash award, at the discretion of management. A deferred cash award is issued for a cash value and becomes payable over a three-year vesting period if the portfolio manager remains in the continuous employ of MFS or its affiliates. During the vesting period, the value of the unfunded deferred cash award will fluctuate as though the portfolio manager had invested the cash value of the award in an MFS Fund(s) selected by the portfolio manager. A selected fund may be, but is not required to be, a fund that is managed by the portfolio manager.

Portfolio managers also typically benefit from the opportunity to participate in the MFS Equity Plan. Equity interests and/or options to acquire equity interests in MFS or its parent company are awarded by management, on a discretionary basis, taking into account tenure at MFS, contribution to the investment process, and other factors.

Finally, portfolio managers also participate in benefit plans (including a defined contribution plan and health and other insurance plans) and programs available generally to other employees of MFS. The percentage such benefits represent of any portfolio manager’s compensation depends upon the length of the individual’s tenure at MFS and salary level, as well as other factors.


Table of Contents

Ownership of Fund Shares

The following table shows the dollar range of equity securities of the Fund beneficially owned by the Fund’s portfolio manager(s) as of the Fund’s fiscal year ended November 30, 2014. The following dollar ranges apply:

N. None

A. $1 – $10,000

B. $10,001 – $50,000

C. $50,001 – $100,000

D. $100,001 – $500,000

E. $500,001 – $1,000,000

F. Over $1,000,000

 

Name of Portfolio Manager

  

Dollar Range of Equity Securities in Fund

Richard O. Hawkins    N
William J. Adams    N
Ward Brown    N
David P. Cole    N
Pilar Gomez-Bravo    N
Joshua P. Marston    N
Robert D. Persons    N
Matthew W. Ryan    N
Erik S. Weisman    N

Other Accounts

In addition to the Fund, each portfolio manager of the Fund is named as a portfolio manager of certain other accounts managed or subadvised by MFS or an affiliate. The number and assets of these accounts were as follows as of November 30, 2014:

 

     Registered Investment
Companies*
   Other Pooled  Investment
Vehicles
   Other Accounts

Name

   Number of
Accounts
   Total
Assets
   Number of
Accounts
   Total Assets    Number of
Accounts
   Total Assets

Richard O. Hawkins

   10    $18.3 billion    3    $3.5 billion    2    $132.9 million

William J. Adams

   13    $8.1 billion    4    $1.2 billion    1    $109.7 million

Ward Brown

   12    $11.7 billion    8    $4.0 billion    6    $1.4 billion

David P. Cole

   12    $8.1 billion    2    $964.8 million    1    $109.7 million

Pilar Bravo-Gomez

   4    $3.6 billion    3    $3.4 billion    1    $103.1 million

Joshua P. Marston

   7    $19.7 billion    8    $5.0 billion    11    $581.7 million

Robert D. Persons

   11    $15.0 billion    5    $4.1 billion    2    $273.8 million

Matthew W. Ryan

   14    $12.5 billion    9    $4.9 billion    6    $1.4 billion

Erik S. Weisman

   11    $6.7 billion    3    $3.5 billion    1    $103.1 million

 

* Includes the Fund.


Table of Contents

Advisory fees are not based upon performance of any of the accounts identified in the table above.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

The Adviser seeks to identify potential conflicts of interest resulting from a portfolio manager’s management of both the Fund and other accounts, and has adopted policies and procedures designed to address such potential conflicts.

The management of multiple funds and accounts (including proprietary accounts) gives rise to conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives and strategies, benchmarks, time horizons and fees as a portfolio manager must allocate his or her time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. In certain instances there are securities which are suitable for the Fund’s portfolio as well as for accounts of the Adviser or its subsidiaries with similar investment objectives. The Fund’s trade allocation policies may give rise to conflicts of interest if the Fund’s orders do not get fully executed or are delayed in getting executed due to being aggregated with those of other accounts of the Adviser or its subsidiaries. A portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely affect the value of the Fund’s investments. Investments selected for funds or accounts other than the Fund may outperform investments selected for the Fund.

When two or more clients are simultaneously engaged in the purchase or sale of the same security, the securities are allocated among clients in a manner believed by the Adviser to be fair and equitable to each. Allocations may be based on many factors and may not always be pro rata based on assets managed. The allocation methodology could have a detrimental effect on the price or volume of the security as far as the Fund is concerned.

The Adviser and/or a portfolio manager may have a financial incentive to allocate favorable or limited opportunity investments or structure the timing of investments to favor accounts other than the Fund, for instance, those that pay a higher advisory fee and/or have a performance adjustment and/or include an investment by the portfolio manager.

 

ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.

MFS Charter Income Trust

 

Period

   (a) Total number
of Shares
Purchased
     (b)
Average
Price
Paid per
Share
     (c) Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
     (d) Maximum
Number (or
Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
under the Plans
or Programs
 

12/01/13-12/31/13

     231,831         9.06         231,831         5,141,081   

1/01/14-1/31/14

     0         N/A         0         5,141,081   

2/01/14-2/28/14

     0         N/A         0         5,141,081   

3/01/14-3/31/14

     146,867         9.13         146,867         5,307,082   

4/01/14-4/30/14

     0         N/A         0         5,307,082   

5/01/14-5/31/14

     0         N/A         0         5,307,082   


Table of Contents

6/01/14-6/30/14

     0         N/A         0         5,307,082   

7/01/14-7/31/14

     264,000         9.22         264,000         5,043,082   

8/01/14-8/31/14

     0         N/A         0         5,043,082   

9/1/14-9/30/14

     0         N/A         0         5,043,082   

10/1/14-10/31/14

     214,019         8.96         214,019         4,829,063   

11/1/14-11/30/14

     0         N/A         0         4,829,063   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total

     856,717         9.10         856,717      

Note: The Board of Trustees approves procedures to repurchase shares annually. The notification to shareholders of the program is part of the semi-annual and annual reports sent to shareholders. These annual programs begin on March 1st of each year. The programs conform to the conditions of Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and limit the aggregate number of shares that may be purchased in each annual period (March 1 through the following February 28) to 10% of the Registrant’s outstanding shares as of the first day of the plan year (March 1). The aggregate number of shares available for purchase for the March 1, 2014 plan year is 5,453,949.

 

ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may send recommendations to the Board for nominees to the Registrant’s Board since the Registrant last provided disclosure as to such procedures in response to the requirements of Item 407 (c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K or this Item.

 

ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

 

(a) Based upon their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”)) as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this Form N-CSR, the registrant’s principal financial officer and principal executive officer have concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that the material information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

 

(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter covered by the report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Table of Contents
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.

 

(a) File the exhibits listed below as part of this form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated.

 

  (1) Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Code of Ethics attached hereto.

 

  (2) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2): Attached hereto.

 

  (3) Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the Act sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the Registrant to 10 or more persons. Not applicable.

 

(b) If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)), Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: Attached hereto.


Table of Contents

Notice

A copy of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Registrant is on file with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and notice is hereby given that this instrument is executed on behalf of the Registrant by an officer of the Registrant as an officer and not individually and the obligations of or arising out of this instrument are not binding upon any of the Trustees or shareholders individually, but are binding only upon the assets and property of the respective constituent series of the Registrant.


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant MFS CHARTER INCOME TRUST

 

By (Signature and Title)*   ROBIN A. STELMACH
  Robin A. Stelmach, President

Date: January 15, 2015

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By (Signature and Title)*   ROBIN A. STELMACH
  Robin A. Stelmach, President (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: January 15, 2015

 

By (Signature and Title)*   DAVID L. DILORENZO
  David L. DiLorenzo, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer)

Date: January 15, 2015

 

* Print name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.