Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

 

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

 

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  x                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨		Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x		Definitive Proxy Statement
¨		Definitive Additional Materials
¨		Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

THE HOME DEPOT, INC.

 

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

x		No fee required.
¨		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
		(1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
		(2)		Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
		(3)		Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
		(4)		Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
		(5)		Total fee paid:
¨		Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨		Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
		(1)		Amount Previously Paid:
		(2)		Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
		(3)		Filing Party:
		(4)		Date Filed:

 

 

 

---

Table of Contents

---

Table of Contents

TO MY FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS:

It is my pleasure to invite you to attend our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time. The meeting will be held at the Cobb Galleria Centre in Atlanta, Georgia.

The enclosed notice of meeting and proxy statement contain important information, including a description of the business that will be acted upon at the meeting, voting procedures and documentation required to attend the meeting. At the meeting, we will also report on the Company’s performance and operations and respond to your questions. If you will need special assistance or seating, please contact Kristy Homansky at (770) 384-3533.

If you are unable to attend the meeting, you can listen to the meeting and view the presentation on the Company’s performance through the live webcast on the Internet. Visit our Annual Meeting website at http://annualmeeting.homedepot.com for details. The webcast will be archived and available for replay beginning shortly after the meeting.

I hope you will be able to join us, and I look forward to seeing you.

Sincerely,

 

Craig A. Menear

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

 

		Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mail.

 

Vote by Internet		Vote by telephone		Vote by mail
www.proxyvote.com		1-800-690-6903		Complete and mail your proxy card

---

Table of Contents

		THE HOME DEPOT, INC. 2455 Paces Ferry Road Atlanta, Georgia 30339

NOTICE OF 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

DATE:		Thursday, May 19, 2016
TIME:		9:00 a.m., Eastern Time
PLACE:		Cobb Galleria Centre Two Galleria Parkway Atlanta, Georgia 30339
ITEMS OF BUSINESS:		(1)		To elect as directors of the Company the twelve persons named in the accompanying Proxy Statement for terms expiring at the 2017 annual meeting;
		(2)		To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 29, 2017;
		(3)		To cast an advisory vote to approve executive compensation;
		(4)		To act on two shareholder proposals described in the Proxy Statement, if properly presented; and
		(5)		To transact any other business properly brought before the meeting.
WHO MAY VOTE:		Shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 21, 2016 are entitled to vote.
ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS:		A copy of this Proxy Statement and our 2015 Annual Report are available at http://reports.homedepot.com.
DATE OF MAILING:		A Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or this Proxy Statement is first being sent to shareholders on or about April 4, 2016.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

Teresa Wynn Roseborough

Corporate Secretary

---

Table of Contents

THE HOME DEPOT 2016 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		i

---

Table of Contents

THE HOME DEPOT 2016 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider. Please read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting as it contains important information about matters upon which you are being asked to vote.

2016 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION (see pages 1-4)

 

 

Date:		Thursday, May 19, 2016
Time:		9:00 a.m., Eastern Time
Location:		Cobb Galleria Centre, Two Galleria Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Record Date:		March 21, 2016
Admission:		To attend the meeting in person, you will need proof of your share ownership and valid picture identification
Meeting Webcast:		http://annualmeeting.homedepot.com beginning at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on May 19, 2016

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

 

 

Proposal				Board Recommendation		Page Number
1.		Election of twelve directors for one-year terms		For		13
2.		Ratification of appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm		For		20
3.		“Say-on-Pay” advisory vote to approve executive compensation		For		23
4.		Shareholder proposal regarding preparation of an employment diversity report		Against		24
5.		Shareholder proposal to reduce the threshold to call special shareholder meetings to 10% of outstanding shares		Against		26

FISCAL 2015 COMPANY PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS (see page 29)

 

Strong execution of our strategic initiatives resulted in solid performance for fiscal 2015. Highlights include:

 

•

Increased net sales by 6.4% to $88.5 billion

•

Increased operating income by 12.5% to $11.8 billion

•

Increased diluted earnings per share by 15.9% to $5.46

•

Generated $9.4 billion in operating cash flow

•

Increased return on invested capital from 24.9% to 28.0%

•

Returned value to shareholders during fiscal 2015 through a 20% increase in our stock price, $3.0 billion in dividends, and $7.0 billion in share repurchases

FISCAL 2015 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS (see pages 28-41)

 

 

 

ii		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

THE HOME DEPOT 2016 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

 

OUR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICIES REFLECT BEST PRACTICES (see pages 5-12)

 

 

 

2016 DIRECTOR NOMINEES (see pages 13-19)

 

 

Director Nominees

Board Committee Composition

Name

Director  Since

Position

Audit

LDCC

NCGC

Finance

Gerard J. Arpey*

2015

Partner, Emerald Creek Group LLC

Ari Bousbib*

2007

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, IMS Health Incorporated

Chair

Gregory D. Brenneman* (Lead Director)

2000

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, CCMP Capital Advisors, LLC

J. Frank Brown* (Audit Committee Financial Expert)

2011

Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, General Atlantic LLC

Chair

Albert P. Carey*

2008

Chief Executive Officer, PepsiCo North America Beverages

Chair

Armando Codina*

2007

Chairman, Codina Partners, LLC

Chair

Helena B. Foulkes*

2013

Executive Vice President, CVS Health Corporation and President, CVS/pharmacy

Linda R. Gooden* (Audit Committee Financial Expert)

2015

Former Executive Vice President, Information Systems & Global Solutions, Lockheed Martin Corporation

Wayne M. Hewett*

2014

Chief Executive Officer, Klöckner Pentaplast Group

Karen L. Katen*

2007

Senior Advisor, Essex Woodlands Health Ventures

Craig A. Menear

2014

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, The Home Depot, Inc.

Mark Vadon*

2012

Founder and former Chairman, zulily, Inc. and Blue Nile, Inc.

*  All director nominees are independent except Mr. Menear, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President.

LDCC = Leadership Development and Compensation Committee   NCGC = Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		iii

---

Table of Contents

ABOUT THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

WHEN AND WHERE IS THE MEETING?

The 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) of The Home Depot, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at the Cobb Galleria Centre, Two Galleria Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia, on Thursday, May 19, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time.

WHAT AM I VOTING ON?

You will be voting on the following items:

 

•

Election to the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the twelve persons named in “Election of Directors” below to serve until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

•

Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending January 29, 2017 (“Fiscal 2016”);

•

An advisory vote to approve executive compensation, also referred to as “say-on-pay”;

•

A shareholder proposal regarding the preparation of an employment diversity report and a shareholder proposal to reduce the threshold for calling special shareholder meetings to 10% of outstanding shares, each as described in this Proxy Statement; and

•

Transaction of any other business properly brought before the Meeting.

WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE?

Holders of record of shares of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business on March 21, 2016, the record date for the Meeting, are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter presented for a vote of the shareholders. As of March 21, 2016, we had 1,251,493,194 shares of common stock outstanding.

WHO IS SOLICITING MY VOTE?

The Company is providing this Proxy Statement in connection with the solicitation by the Board of proxies to be voted at the Meeting and at any reconvened or rescheduled meeting following any adjournment or postponement of the Meeting.

HOW DO I VOTE BEFORE THE MEETING?

If you are a registered shareholder, which means you hold your shares in certificate form or through an account with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you have three options for voting before the Meeting:

 

•

Over the Internet, at www.proxyvote.com, by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) or proxy card;

•

By telephone, by dialing 1-800-690-6903; or

•

By completing, dating, signing and returning a proxy card by mail.

If you are a beneficial holder, meaning you hold your shares in “street name” through an account with a bank or broker, your ability to vote over the Internet or by telephone depends on the voting procedures of your bank or broker. Please follow the directions on the voting instruction form that your bank or broker provides.

MAY I VOTE AT THE MEETING?

Yes. If you are a registered shareholder, you may vote your shares at the Meeting if you attend in person. If you hold your shares through an account with a bank or broker, you must obtain and present a legal proxy from the bank or broker in order to vote at the Meeting. A legal proxy is an authorization from your bank or broker for you to vote the shares it holds in its name on your behalf. Even if you plan to attend the Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares before the Meeting.

HOW CAN I ATTEND THE MEETING?

To attend the Meeting, you will need to bring (1) an admission ticket if your shares are registered in your name or a legal proxy from the bank or broker that is the record owner of your shares and (2) valid picture identification. If your shares are registered in your name and you received a Notice, the Notice is your admission ticket. If your shares are registered in your name and you received proxy materials by mail,

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		1

---

Table of Contents

ABOUT THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

your admission ticket is attached to your proxy card. If you hold shares through an account with a bank or broker, you will need to contact your bank or broker and request a legal proxy, which will serve as your admission ticket.

If you do not have valid picture identification and either an admission ticket or a legal proxy, you will not be admitted to the Meeting.

You may indicate whether you plan to attend the Meeting by checking the appropriate box if completing a proxy card or the voting instruction form provided by your bank or broker, responding when prompted if voting by telephone, or making the appropriate selection at the bottom of the screen after entering your control number at www.proxyvote.com if voting over the Internet.

MAY I REVOKE MY PROXY AND/OR CHANGE MY VOTE?

Yes. You may revoke your proxy and/or change your vote by:

 

•

Signing another proxy card with a later date and delivering it to us before the Meeting;

•

Voting again over the Internet or by telephone prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 18, 2016;

•

Voting at the Meeting before the polls close if you are a registered shareholder or have obtained a legal proxy from your bank or broker; or

•

Notifying the Company’s Corporate Secretary in writing before the Meeting that you revoke your proxy.

WHAT IF I SIGN AND RETURN MY PROXY BUT DO NOT PROVIDE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS?

Proxies that are signed, dated and returned but do not contain voting instructions will be voted:

 

•

“For” the election of all of the twelve named director nominees;

•

“For” the ratification of the appointment of KPMG;

•

“For” the advisory vote to approve executive compensation;

•

“Against” each shareholder proposal; and

•

On any other matters properly brought before the Meeting, in accordance with the best judgment of the named proxies.

If your shares are held through an account with a bank or broker, see “Will My Shares Be Voted If I Do Not Provide a Proxy or Voting Instruction Form?” below.

HOW DO I VOTE IF I PARTICIPATE IN ONE OF THE COMPANY’S RETIREMENT PLANS?

You may vote your shares over the Internet, by telephone, by mail or in person at the Meeting as if you were a registered shareholder, as described in this Proxy Statement. By voting, you are instructing the trustee of your plan to vote all of your shares as directed. If you do not vote, the shares credited to your account will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion that it votes shares in other accounts for which it received timely instructions. If, however, you hold shares through the self-directed brokerage window of your plan or you participate in one of the Company’s Canada-based retirement plans and, in either case, you do not vote those shares, those shares will not be voted.

WILL MY SHARES BE VOTED IF I DO NOT PROVIDE A PROXY OR VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM?

If you are a registered shareholder and do not provide a proxy by voting over the Internet, by telephone or by signing and returning a proxy card, you must attend the Meeting in order to vote.

If you hold shares through an account with a bank or broker, the voting of the shares by the bank or broker when you do not provide voting instructions is governed by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”). These rules allow banks and brokers to vote shares in their discretion on “routine” matters for which their customers do not provide voting instructions. On matters considered “non-routine,” banks and brokers may not vote shares without your instruction. Shares that banks and brokers are not authorized to vote are referred to as “broker non-votes.”

 

2		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

ABOUT THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

The ratification of KPMG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for Fiscal 2016 is considered a routine matter. Accordingly, banks and brokers may vote shares on this proposal without your instructions, and there will be no broker non-votes with respect to this proposal.

The other proposals will be considered non-routine, and banks and brokers therefore cannot vote shares on those proposals without your instructions. Please note that if you want your vote to be counted on those proposals, including the election of directors, you must instruct your bank or broker how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, no votes will be cast on your behalf with respect to those proposals.

HOW MANY SHARES MUST BE PRESENT TO HOLD THE MEETING?

In order for us to conduct the Meeting, holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the close of business on March 21, 2016 must be present in person or by proxy. This is referred to as a quorum. Your shares are counted as present if you attend the Meeting and vote in person or if you properly return a proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum. If a quorum is not present at the Meeting, the Meeting may be adjourned from time to time until a quorum is present.

HOW MANY VOTES ARE NEEDED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSALS?

With respect to the election of directors, each director nominee receiving a majority of votes cast with respect to that director nominee’s election will be elected as a director. If any of the incumbent director nominees does not receive a majority of votes cast, under Delaware law he or she would continue to serve on the Board until a successor is elected. However, our By-Laws provide that any incumbent director who fails to receive a majority of votes cast must promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board for consideration. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation or to take any other action. The Board will act on that recommendation and publicly disclose its decision within 90 days following certification of election results. The director who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation or in the Board’s decision.

The ratification of KPMG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and each of the shareholder proposals require a majority of votes cast to be approved.

Under the Company’s By-Laws, the advisory vote to approve executive compensation also requires a majority of votes cast to be approved. While this proposal is advisory in nature and not binding on the Company, our Leadership Development and Compensation Committee (“LDC Committee”) and Board will consider the results of the voting on this proposal in formulating future executive compensation policy.

A “majority of votes cast” means the number of “For” votes exceeds the number of “Against” votes. A proxy marked “Abstain” with respect to any proposal therefore generally will not have any effect on the outcome of the vote on that proposal. Similarly, broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and therefore generally will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on any proposal.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF I RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE NOTICE, PROXY CARD OR VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM?

This means that your shares are registered in different names or are held in more than one account. To ensure that all shares are voted, please vote each account over the Internet or by telephone, or sign and return by mail all proxy cards and voting instruction forms. We encourage you to register all shares in the same name and address by contacting our transfer agent, Computershare, at 1-800-577-0177. If you hold your shares through an account with a bank or broker, you should contact your bank or broker and request consolidation.

WHY DID SOME SHAREHOLDERS RECEIVE A NOTICE WHILE OTHERS RECEIVED A PRINTED SET OF PROXY MATERIALS?

We are allowed to furnish our proxy materials to requesting shareholders over the Internet, rather than by mailing printed copies, so long as we send them a “Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.” The

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		3

---

Table of Contents

ABOUT THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

Notice tells shareholders how to access and review the Proxy Statement and 2015 Annual Report and how to vote over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com. If you receive the Notice and would like to receive printed proxy materials, follow the instructions in the Notice. If you receive printed proxy materials, you will not receive the Notice, but you may still access our proxy materials and submit your proxy over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com.

AVAILABILITY OF ANNUAL REPORT AND PROXY STATEMENT TO SHAREHOLDERS

Only one copy of the Notice or this Proxy Statement and the 2015 Annual Report is being delivered to shareholders sharing an address unless the Company has received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. Shareholders sharing an address who wish to receive separate copies of the Notice or this Proxy Statement and the 2015 Annual Report, or who wish to begin receiving a single copy of such materials, may make such request as follows:

 

•

If you are a registered shareholder, by writing to Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 or by calling 1-800-542-1061; or

•

If you are a beneficial owner, by contacting your broker, dealer, bank, voting trustee or other nominee.

Registered shareholders sharing an address who elect to receive a single copy of the Notice or this Proxy Statement and the 2015 Annual Report will continue to receive separate proxy cards.

You may also elect to receive the Notice or this Proxy Statement and the 2015 Annual Report via e-mail by contacting Broadridge if you are a registered shareholder, by contacting your bank or broker if you are a beneficial owner, or by visiting our website at http://reports.homedepot.com.

Additional copies of this Proxy Statement and the 2015 Annual Report will be provided without charge to shareholders upon written request to Investor Relations, The Home Depot, Inc., 2455 Paces Ferry Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30339, by calling (770) 384-4388. Copies may also be obtained via the Internet at http://reports.homedepot.com.

WHERE AND WHEN WILL I BE ABLE TO FIND THE VOTING RESULTS?

You can find the official results of the voting at the Meeting in our Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) within four business days after the Meeting. If the official results are not available at that time, we will provide preliminary voting results in the Form 8-K and will provide the final results in an amendment to the Form 8-K as soon as they become available.

 

4		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Company has a long-standing commitment to strong corporate governance. Strong corporate governance promotes the long-term interests of shareholders, strengthens Board and management accountability and helps build public trust in the Company. The Board has adopted policies and processes that foster effective Board oversight of critical matters such as strategy, risk management, financial and other controls, compliance and management succession planning. The Board reviews our major governance documents, policies and processes regularly in the context of current corporate governance trends, regulatory changes and recognized best practices. The following sections provide an overview of our corporate governance structure, policies and processes, including key aspects of our Board operations.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Our Board currently has twelve members: Gerard J. Arpey, Ari Bousbib, Gregory D. Brenneman, J. Frank Brown, Albert P. Carey, Armando Codina, Helena B. Foulkes, Linda R. Gooden, Wayne M. Hewett, Karen L. Katen, Craig A. Menear and Mark Vadon. Each director who served during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016 (“Fiscal 2015”) was, and each current director continues to be, independent other than Mr. Menear, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and President.

BOARD LEADERSHIP

 

We believe that having a combined Chairman, CEO and President, an independent Lead Director, and Board committees composed entirely of independent directors currently provides the best Board leadership structure for the Company. This structure, together with our other robust corporate governance practices, provides strong independent oversight of management while ensuring clear strategic alignment throughout the Company. Specifically, Mr. Menear proposes strategic priorities to the Board (with input from the Lead Director), communicates the Board’s guidance to management, and is ultimately responsible for implementing the Company’s key strategic initiatives.

At the same time, the Company recognizes the importance of providing independent oversight of the Board. Accordingly, since 1998, the Company has had a Lead Director. Our Lead Director is an independent director elected annually by the independent members of the Board. Gregory D. Brenneman, a director since 2000, currently serves as our Lead Director. Our Lead Director:

 

•

Chairs Board meetings when the Chairman is not present, including presiding at executive sessions of the Board (without management present) at every regularly scheduled Board meeting;

•

Works with management to determine the information and materials provided to Board members;

•

Approves Board meeting agendas, schedules and other information provided to the Board;

•

Consults with the Chairman on other matters that are pertinent to the Board and the Company;

•

Has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors;

•

Is available for communication and consultation with major shareholders upon request; and

•

Serves as liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors.

To maximize the effectiveness of the Lead Director role, our Lead Director does not serve on any standing Board committees but instead is available to attend meetings of any of our Board committees and serve as a resource for the committees as needed.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

During Fiscal 2015, the Board had standing Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, Leadership Development and Compensation, and Finance Committees. The charters for each of the committees are available on the Company’s website at http://corporategovernance.homedepot.com/committees. The current members of our committees, the principal functions of each committee and the number of meetings held in Fiscal 2015 are shown below. Each member of each committee during Fiscal 2015 was, and each current member continues to be, independent under our Director Independence Standards and applicable SEC rules and NYSE listing standards.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		5

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

Name of Committee  and Current Members				Committee Functions
Audit: J. Frank Brown, Chair Ari Bousbib Linda R. Gooden Wayne M. Hewett Mark Vadon   Number of Meetings: 9		•		Oversees the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the audit thereof, the Company’s accounting and financial reporting process, and the Company’s systems of internal control over financial reporting
		•		Has primary responsibility for overseeing risk assessment and risk management
		•		Has primary responsibility for overseeing IT and data security risks
		•		Reviews the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-bribery laws
		•		Reviews the qualifications, performance and independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
		•		Oversees the performance of the Company’s internal audit function
		•		Reviews the Company’s compliance programs, including the whistleblower program, and the Company’s monitoring of such programs
Nominating and Corporate Governance: Armando Codina, Chair Gerard J. Arpey Albert P. Carey Helena B. Foulkes Karen L. Katen   Number of Meetings: 4		•		Develops the Company’s corporate governance practices and procedures and oversees the related risks
		•		Reviews and makes recommendations on significant Company policies affecting corporate and social issues
		•		Reviews and monitors the performance and composition of the Board and its committees
		•		Makes recommendations for director nominees
		•		Reviews the independence of directors
		•		Oversees communications between directors and shareholders
		•		Reviews and approves or ratifies related-party transactions involving executive officers and directors
		•		Oversees director engagement, education and orientation activities
Leadership Development and Compensation: Albert P. Carey, Chair Armando Codina Helena B. Foulkes Linda R. Gooden Wayne M. Hewett   Number of Meetings: 7		•		Reviews and evaluates the performance of executive officers
		•		Reviews and recommends compensation of directors and the CEO and approves compensation of other executive officers
		•		Reviews and recommends policies, practices and procedures concerning compensation strategy and other human resources-related matters
		•		Administers stock incentive and stock purchase plans, including determining grants of equity awards under the plans
		•		Undertakes annual review and risk assessment of compensation policies and practices
		•		Oversees senior management succession planning policies and procedures
		•		Monitors the independence of its compensation consultant
Finance: Ari Bousbib, Chair Gerard J. Arpey J. Frank Brown Karen L. Katen Mark Vadon   Number of Meetings: 4		•		Oversees the management of the Company’s long-range financial outlook and related financial risks
		•		Reviews and recommends policies, practices and strategies concerning financial matters, including the Company’s capital structure, investments and use of derivatives, share repurchases, credit programs, credit ratings, and insurance
		•		Oversees the Company’s annual capital plan, significant capital investments and strategies with respect to mergers and acquisitions activity

 

6		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

ATTENDANCE AT BOARD, COMMITTEE AND ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS

 

The Board met seven times during Fiscal 2015. The number of times that each standing committee of the Board met in Fiscal 2015 is shown in the section above. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and of the committees of which he or she was a member during Fiscal 2015. Company policy provides that all directors are expected to attend annual shareholder meetings, absent extraordinary circumstances. Every director serving on our Board at the time of the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders attended that meeting other than Mr. Vadon, who missed the meeting due to illness.

BOARD OVERSIGHT OF RISK

 

The Board’s oversight of risk is accomplished through the identification of key risks facing the Company and the mapping of those risks to the appropriate Board committee or to the full Board, based on the nature of the risk.

Audit Committee

In accordance with NYSE requirements and our Audit Committee charter, our Audit Committee has primary responsibility for overseeing risk assessment and management, including the Company’s major financial exposures and compliance risks and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures and risks.

The Audit Committee stays apprised of significant actual and potential risks faced by the Company in part through review of quarterly reports from our Enterprise Risk Council (the “ERC”). The quarterly ERC reports not only identify the risks faced by the Company, but also identify whether primary oversight of each risk resides with a particular Board committee or the full Board. Our ERC is composed of leaders from the functional areas of the Company and meets at least quarterly to coordinate information sharing and mitigation efforts for all types of risks applicable to the Company. The chair of the ERC, who is also our Vice President of Internal Audit and Corporate Compliance, reports the ERC’s risk analyses to senior management regularly and attends each Audit Committee meeting. The chair of the ERC also provides a detailed annual report regarding the Company’s risk assessment and management process to the full Board.

The Audit Committee also has primary responsibility for overseeing risks related to information technology and data privacy and security, which we generally refer to as “IT and data security,” although the full Board also exercises oversight over these risks. This oversight includes detailed reports to the Audit Committee and/or the full Board on IT and data security matters from senior members of our IT and internal audit departments. The topics covered by these reports include risk management strategies, consumer data security, the Company’s ongoing risk mitigation activities, updates on matters related to the data breach discovered by the Company in the third quarter of the fiscal year ended February 1, 2015 (“Fiscal 2014”), and cybersecurity strategy and governance structure. In addition, our internal audit department routinely performs audits on various aspects of IT and data security and reports the results of these audits in its quarterly internal audit report for the Audit Committee. We also have a Data Security and Privacy Governance Committee, chaired by our Vice President of Internal Audit and Corporate Compliance and composed of leaders from the functional areas of the Company, that meets on a monthly basis and reports quarterly to the Audit Committee. The Data Security and Privacy Governance Committee was created to provide enterprise-wide oversight and governance over data security, including oversight of data security risks, mitigation and incident response plans, awareness and training programs, and regulatory compliance.

The Audit Committee also receives quarterly reports from our FCPA Oversight Committee, which oversees enterprise-wide compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the anti-bribery laws of the other jurisdictions in which we conduct business. The FCPA Oversight Committee, which is chaired by our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary (“GC”), is composed of our Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President – Corporate Services (“CFO”), our Vice President of Internal Audit and Corporate Compliance, and representatives from each non-U.S. division,

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		7

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

the business functions responsible for administration of our policies, and the business functions that manage our transactions outside of the U.S. In addition, the Audit Committee meets with the chair of the ERC, our GC, our CFO, and KPMG, our independent registered public accounting firm, in a private session at each quarterly Audit Committee meeting.

Other Board Committees

In accordance with our risk mapping, our other Board committees consider significant risks within their areas of responsibility. As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 28, our LDC Committee oversees risks related to our compensation programs, including an annual review and risk assessment of the Company’s compensation policies and practices, and monitors the independence of its compensation consultant. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees risks related to our governance policies and practices, including review and approval of any related-party transactions and relationships involving our directors and executive officers. Our Finance Committee oversees risks related to our capital structure, financial resources, utilization of derivatives and accelerated share repurchase agreements, and related financial matters. Each of our committees reports to the Board at each quarterly Board meeting.

In addition, the Board and each committee receive presentations throughout the year from management regarding specific potential risks and trends as necessary. At each Board meeting, our Chairman, CEO and President has the opportunity to discuss in a directors-only session matters of particular importance or concern, including any significant, evolving or nascent risks that may be of concern to the Board or the Company, and our Lead Director presides over an executive session of our independent directors. Annually, through dedicated sessions focusing exclusively on corporate strategy, our full Board reviews in detail the Company’s short- and long-term strategies, including consideration of significant risks facing the Company and their potential impact. We believe that the practices described above and our current leadership structure facilitate effective Board oversight of our significant risks.

RECENT GOVERNANCE CHANGES – ADOPTION OF PROXY ACCESS BY-LAW

 

In March 2016, the Board approved an amendment to our By-Laws to permit a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning at least 3% of the Company’s outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, provided that the shareholders and the nominees satisfy the requirements specified in the By-Laws. Previously, shareholders had no right or means to nominate directors through the Company’s Proxy Statement.

 

8		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

 

The Company maintains Corporate Governance Guidelines that establish a common set of expectations to assist the Board and its committees in performing their duties. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available at http://corporategovernance.homedepot.com and in print upon request. Following are a few key elements of our Guidelines:

 

Outside Board Policy		We limit the number of other public company boards our directors may join to ensure that a director is not “over-boarded” and is able to devote the appropriate amount of time and attention to the oversight of the Company. A director who is in an active, full-time role with a for-profit business may not serve on more than three other public company boards. Other directors may not serve on more than four other public company boards. In addition, Mr. Menear, our Chairman, CEO and President, may not serve on more than one other public company board. Any director seeking to join the board of directors of another public company or for-profit organization must first notify the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and obtain its approval to continue as a member of our Board.
Succession Planning		The Board and LDC Committee are actively engaged in succession planning for the Company, and regularly review the succession plans that support the Company’s overall business strategy, with a focus on key positions in the senior officer level, including our CEO. The Board demonstrated its commitment to orderly succession planning in the transition that took place in Fiscal 2014 when Mr. Menear became our Chairman, CEO and President and other executive officer-level changes were implemented.
Director Engagement, Education and Orientation Program		The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the directors’ engagement, continuing education and orientation program, which includes both internal activities and access to external programming. Our program includes periodic store walks and in-depth meetings with management to provide our directors with the opportunity to observe our strategic initiatives in action and to expand their insight into business operations and activities.
Board Self-Evaluations		Each year, the Board, as required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, conducts an evaluation of its performance and effectiveness. In addition, each of our Board committees conducts a self-evaluation pursuant to the requirements of the respective committee charter. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the annual self-assessment process on behalf of the Board.

BUSINESS CODE OF CONDUCT

 

The Company has a Business Code of Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all directors, officers and associates of the Company, including the CEO and the CFO. The Business Code of Conduct and Ethics reflects our strong commitment to ethics and integrity, and provides guidance on making decisions that align with our core values. The complete text of the code is available on the Company’s website at http://corporategovernance.homedepot.com and is also available in print at no charge upon request. The Company will post any amendments to or waivers from the Business Code of Conduct and Ethics (to the extent applicable to the Company’s executive officers and directors) at this location on its website.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		9

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

The Director Independence Standards in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines exceed the independence standards adopted by the NYSE. Our independence standards are attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement. Pursuant to these guidelines, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviewed the independence of each director in early 2016. During this review, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considered all relevant facts and circumstances related to transactions and relationships between each director (and his or her immediate family and affiliates) and the Company and its management to determine whether any such relationship or transaction would prohibit a director from being independent under SEC rules, the NYSE listing standards and the Company’s Director Independence Standards.

Based on this review and the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board affirmatively determined that all of the individuals nominated for election to the Board at the Meeting are independent except Craig A. Menear, our Chairman, CEO and President.

The Company has purchase, sale and other transactions and relationships in the normal course of business with companies with which certain Company directors are associated, but which our Board determined are not material to the Company, the directors or, except as otherwise indicated below, the companies with which the directors are associated. All of these transactions were reviewed and considered by the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in determining the independence of Company directors. In particular, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee took into account the following transactions during Fiscal 2015:

 

•

Mr. Arpey served as a director of S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., from which we purchased cleaning supply merchandise.

•

Mr. Brenneman served as the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of CCMP Capital Advisors, LLC, which manages funds that have or had an equity interest in (1) Aramark Corporation, from which we purchased food services and uniform apparel; (2) Infogroup Inc., from which we purchased marketing analytics services; and (3) The Hillman Companies, Inc., from which we purchased fasteners and other small hardware items. In Fiscal 2015, the Company was one of Hillman’s largest customers. Mr. Brenneman does not serve as a director or officer of Aramark, Infogroup or Hillman.

•

Mr. Brown served as Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of General Atlantic LLC, which manages funds that have or had an equity interest in (1) Appirio Inc., from which we purchased cloud technology services; (2) Bazaarvoice, Inc., from which we purchased software; (3) Box, Inc., from which we purchased data sharing services; (4) Mu Sigma Inc., from which we purchased data analytics consulting services; and (5) Uber Technologies, Inc., from which we purchased transportation services. Mr. Brown does not serve as a director or officer of any of these portfolio companies.

•

Mr. Carey served as Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo North America Beverages, from which we purchased food and beverage products.

•

Ms. Foulkes served as Executive Vice President of CVS Health Corporation and President of CVS/pharmacy, from which we purchased prescription management and health care services.

•

Ms. Gooden served as a director of Automatic Data Processing, Inc., from which we purchased payroll and tax services; and as a director of General Motors Company, from which we purchased automobiles and related services.

•

Ms. Katen served as a director of Air Liquide, from which we purchased industrial gases.

•

Mr. Vadon served as a director of Liberty Interactive Corporation, from which we purchased digital media goods and services; and as a director of zulily, Inc., from which we purchased office décor products.

In each instance described above, the amount of payments made and received by each entity represented an immaterial percentage of the Company’s and, except as otherwise stated above, the other entity’s revenues. The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe

 

10		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

that all of the transactions and relationships during Fiscal 2015 described above were on arm’s-length terms that were reasonable and competitive and that the directors did not participate in or receive any direct personal benefit from these transactions.

RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews all related-party transactions and relationships involving a Board member or officer of the Company subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). To help identify related-party transactions and relationships, each director and executive officer completes a questionnaire that requires the disclosure of any transaction or relationship that the person, or any member of his or her immediate family, has or will have with the Company. Our GC also conducts an independent investigation by reviewing the Company’s financial systems to determine if a director or executive officer, or a company with which he or she is affiliated, engaged in transactions or had a relationship with the Company during the fiscal year. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibility for the review and approval or ratification of related-party transactions is set forth in its charter.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and approves, ratifies or rejects any transaction or relationship with a related party that is identified. In approving, ratifying or rejecting a related-party transaction or relationship, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers such information as it deems important to determine whether the transaction is on reasonable and competitive terms and is fair to the Company. Transactions and relationships that are determined to be directly or indirectly material to the Company or a related party are disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement.

During Fiscal 2015, only one related-party transaction that requires disclosure in this Proxy Statement was entered into by the Company involving any of our directors or executive officers. The Company made purchases of software and related services as well as search engine marketing and advertising from Microsoft, Inc. in the ordinary course of business during Fiscal 2015. The Chief Operating Officer of Microsoft is the brother-in-law of Matthew A. Carey, our Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer. The total payments made to Microsoft during Fiscal 2015 were approximately $34 million, representing less than 0.04% of the revenues of each of the Company and Microsoft.

COMMUNICATING WITH THE BOARD

 

Shareholders and others who are interested in communicating directly with members of the Board, including those wishing to express concerns relating to accounting, internal controls, audit matters, fraud or unethical behavior, may do so by e-mail at HD_Directors@homedepot.com or by writing to the directors at the following address:

[Name of Director or Directors]

c/o Corporate Secretary

The Home Depot, Inc.

2455 Paces Ferry Road

Building C-22

Atlanta, Georgia 30339

The Corporate Secretary reviews and provides the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee with a summary of all such communications and a copy of any correspondence that, in the opinion of the Corporate Secretary, deals with the functions of the Board or the standing committees of the Board, or that otherwise requires the attention of the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Correspondence relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters is brought to the attention of the Company’s internal audit department and, if appropriate, to the Audit Committee. All communications are treated confidentially.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		11

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

SELECTING NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for considering candidates for the Board and recommending director nominees to the Board. All members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have been determined to be independent by the Board pursuant to SEC rules, NYSE listing standards and the Company’s Director Independence Standards.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates for nomination to the Board from a number of sources. Current members of the Board are considered for re-election unless they have notified the Company that they do not wish to stand for re-election and provided they have not reached age 72 by the calendar year-end immediately preceding the Company’s next annual meeting of shareholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider candidates recommended by current members of the Board, members of management and shareholders, as discussed below under “Director Candidates Recommended by Shareholders.”

From time to time, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee engages independent search firms to assist in identifying potential Board candidates. Services provided by the search firms include identifying and assessing potential director candidates meeting criteria established by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, verifying information about the prospective candidate’s credentials, and obtaining a preliminary indication of interest and willingness to serve as a Board member. During Fiscal 2015, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee engaged the third-party search firm Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. to assist it in identifying and assessing potential director candidates. Mr. Arpey, who was appointed to our Board in August 2015, was recommended by our third-party search firm, and Ms. Gooden, who was appointed to our Board in October 2015, was recommended by one of our non-employee directors.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates all candidates, regardless of who recommended the candidate, based on the same criteria. The criteria and the process by which director nominees are considered and selected are discussed further below under “Election of Directors.”

DIRECTOR CANDIDATES RECOMMENDED BY SHAREHOLDERS

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all candidates recommended by a shareholder (or group of shareholders) who owns at least 1% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock and who has held such shares for at least one year as of the date of the recommendation. If the shareholder does not meet these requirements, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may, but is not obligated to, evaluate the candidate and consider him or her for nomination to the Board. A shareholder wishing to recommend a candidate must submit the following documents to the Corporate Secretary, The Home Depot, Inc., 2455 Paces Ferry Road, Building C-22, Atlanta, Georgia 30339 not less than 120 calendar days prior to the anniversary of the date on which the Company’s Proxy Statement was released to shareholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting of shareholders:

 

•

A recommendation that identifies the candidate and provides contact information for that candidate;

•

The written consent of the candidate to serve as a director of the Company, if elected; and

•

Documentation establishing that the shareholder making the recommendation meets the ownership requirements set forth above.

If the candidate is to be evaluated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Corporate Secretary will request from the candidate a detailed résumé, an autobiographical statement explaining the candidate’s interest in serving as a director of the Company, a completed statement regarding conflicts of interest, and a waiver of liability for a background check. These documents must be received from the candidate before the first day of February preceding the annual meeting of shareholders.

 

12		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(ITEM 1 ON THE PROXY CARD)

The Board is elected annually by shareholders to oversee the long-term health and the overall success and financial strength of the Company’s business. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for considering candidates for the Board and recommending director nominees for the Board.

DIRECTOR CRITERIA AND QUALIFICATIONS

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, when considering the composition of our Board, focuses on ensuring a mix of directors that collectively possess the breadth of expertise and experience appropriate for a retailer of our size and geographic scope. The Company is the world’s largest home improvement specialty retailer, with more than 2,270 retail stores in the United States, Canada and Mexico, and our business involves all facets of retail, including finance, marketing, information technology, e-commerce, supply chain, real estate and strategic management. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates each director candidate on the basis of the length, breadth and quality of the candidate’s business experience, the applicability of the candidate’s skills and expertise to the Company’s business and strategic direction, the perspectives that the candidate would bring to the entire Board, and the personality or “fit” of the candidate with existing members of the Board and management.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks directors who can:

 

•

Demonstrate integrity, accountability, informed judgment, financial literacy, creativity and vision;

•

Be prepared to represent the best interests of all Company shareholders and not just one particular constituency;

•

Demonstrate a record of professional accomplishment in his or her chosen field; and

•

Be prepared and able to participate fully in Board activities, including membership on at least two committees.

BOARD REFRESHMENT AND DIVERSITY

 

We routinely assess the composition of our Board of Directors and aim to strike a balance between the knowledge and understanding of the business that comes from longer-term service on the Board with the fresh ideas and perspective that can come from adding new members. We also consider the expertise that is needed as our business changes and expands. In the past five years, we have added six new independent directors, comprising 50% of our current Board. We believe the average tenure for our directors of approximately six years reflects the balance the Board seeks between different perspectives brought by long-serving and new directors.

In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recognizes the importance of selecting directors from various backgrounds and professions in order to ensure that the Board as a whole has a wealth of experiences and perspectives to inform its decisions and enhance its cognitive diversity. Consistent with this philosophy, in addition to focusing on the skills and experience necessary to meet the core needs of the Company, as well as the basic qualifications set forth above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the ability of the candidate to contribute to the Board by leveraging and valuing a broad set of experiences, including the director’s ethnic, gender, generational, and racial diversity. To accomplish this, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is committed to including in each search candidates who reflect diverse backgrounds, including diversity of race and gender. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses the composition, including the diversity, of the Board at least once a year and more frequently as needed, particularly when considering potential new candidates.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		13

---

Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(ITEM 1 ON THE PROXY CARD)

 

2016 DIRECTOR NOMINEES

 

After evaluating the performance and experience of each of the current directors and the composition of the full Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board have recommended the election of all twelve of the incumbent Board members. Each of the twelve individuals nominated for election to the Board would hold office until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his or her successor is elected and qualified. Each nominee has agreed to serve as a director if elected. If for some unforeseen reason a nominee becomes unwilling or unable to serve, proxies will be voted for a substitute nominee selected by the Board in accordance with our By-Laws. The twelve nominees for election to the Board are set forth below.

 

GERARD J. ARPEY, 57, Director since 2015
		Mr. Arpey brings to the Board extensive organizational management, strategic, financial and international experience from his service as chairman, chief executive officer, and chief financial officer of one of the largest global airlines and service as a director of public and private companies. Mr. Arpey has been a partner in Emerald Creek Group, LLC, a private equity firm based in Southern California, since 2012. Prior to his retirement in November 2011, Mr. Arpey served as Chief Executive Officer of AMR Corporation and American Airlines from 2003 through November 2011, immediately prior to their voluntary filing for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. From 2004 through November 2011, he was also Chairman of the AMR Board of Directors. Mr. Arpey previously served as American Airlines’ President and Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance and Planning, and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Arpey currently serves on the board of directors of S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc., a privately-held company. He is a trustee of the American Beacon Funds and also a member of The Business Council.   Other U.S. Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years   AMR Corporation (2003-2011)
ARI BOUSBIB, 55, Director since 2007
		Mr. Bousbib plays a key role in the Board’s oversight of the Company’s supply chain, information technology, international and finance matters, as well as providing insight into the development of corporate strategy. Since 2010, Mr. Bousbib has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IMS Health Incorporated (“IMS Health”), an information services company, and has served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of IMS Health Holdings, Inc., the parent holding company of IMS Health, since its initial public offering in April 2014. Prior to IMS Health, Mr. Bousbib spent 14 years at United Technologies Corporation (“UTC”), a diversified company, where he most recently served as Executive Vice President of UTC and President of UTC’s Commercial Companies, responsible for the strategic direction and operational performance of subsidiaries Otis Elevator Company, Carrier Corporation, UTC Fire & Security and UTC Power. From 2002 to 2008, he served as President of Otis Elevator Company, and from 2000 to 2002 he served as its Chief Operating Officer. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Bousbib was Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Development of UTC. Prior to joining UTC, Mr. Bousbib was a partner at Booz Allen Hamilton, a global management and technology consulting firm. In serving on our Board, Mr. Bousbib draws from his experience with managing large, sophisticated businesses, including oversight of extensive global operations, as well as strategic, finance, supply chain and information technology matters.   Other U.S. Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years   IMS Health Holdings, Inc. (2014 to present)

 

14		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(ITEM 1 ON THE PROXY CARD)

 

 

GREGORY D. BRENNEMAN, 54, Director since 2000
		A successful business leader who has been involved in several well-known corporate spin-off and turnaround-driven transformations, Mr. Brenneman brings to our Board an extensive background in general management of large organizations and expertise in accounting and corporate finance, retail, supply chain, marketing and international matters. Since 2008, Mr. Brenneman has served as Chairman of CCMP Capital Advisors, LLC, a private equity firm with over $12 billion under management, and he was named its President and Chief Executive Officer in February 2015. He is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TurnWorks, Inc., a private equity firm focusing on corporate turnarounds, which he founded in 1994. Mr. Brenneman served as Executive Chairman of Quiznos, a national quick-service restaurant chain, from 2008 to 2010, and as its President and Chief Executive Officer from 2007 to 2008. Prior to joining Quiznos, Mr. Brenneman led restructuring and turnaround efforts at Burger King Corporation, PwC Consulting, a division of PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PwC”), and Continental Airlines, Inc. that resulted in improved customer service, profitability and financial returns.   Other U.S. Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years   Baker Hughes Incorporated (2014 to present) Milacron Holdings Corp. (2015 to present) Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (2001-2014) Francesca’s Holdings Corporation (2010-2015)
J. FRANK BROWN, 59, Director since 2011
		Mr. Brown is a seasoned international business and academic leader whose strong technical expertise in financial and accounting matters qualifies him as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC guidelines, as described in the “Audit Committee Report” on page 21 of this Proxy Statement, and he serves in such capacity on our Audit Committee. Mr. Brown serves as Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of General Atlantic LLC, a global growth equity firm, which he joined in 2011. From 2006 to 2011, Mr. Brown was Dean of INSEAD, an international business school with campuses in France, Singapore and Abu Dhabi. Before his appointment as Dean of INSEAD, he served as a member of its Board and as Chairman of its U.S. Council. Prior to his tenure at INSEAD, Mr. Brown spent 26 years at PwC, where he held a series of leadership roles, including head of its Assurance and Business Advisory Service, Transactions Services and Corporate Development practices, and most recently the leader of the $3.5 billion Advisory Services operating unit of PwC. He also launched PwC’s Genesis Park, a leadership development program to train the next generation of global leaders within the firm. Mr. Brown is a trustee of The Asia Society and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He is also an author and frequent speaker on leadership.   Other U.S. Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years   None.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		15

---

Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(ITEM 1 ON THE PROXY CARD)

 

 

ALBERT P. CAREY, 64, Director since 2008
		Having served in a number of senior executive positions at PepsiCo, Inc., a consumer products company, Mr. Carey enhances our Board’s experience in and oversight of retail, supply chain and marketing matters, as well as contributing to the general management and strategic business development skills of our Board. Mr. Carey currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo North America Beverages, with responsibilities for all aspects of PepsiCo’s beverages business in North America. From 2006 to 2011, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Frito-Lay North America, a snack food company and the largest North American business division of PepsiCo. He also served as President of PepsiCo Sales, the sales division of PepsiCo, from 2003 to 2006, in charge of PepsiCo’s sales and customer management for its retail, food service and fountain businesses. Other positions that Mr. Carey has held at PepsiCo include Chief Operating Officer of PepsiCo Beverages & Foods North America, Senior Vice President of Sales for Pepsi-Cola North America and Chief Operating Officer of Frito-Lay North America. Prior to his career at PepsiCo, Mr. Carey spent seven years at Procter & Gamble.   Other U.S. Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years   None.
ARMANDO CODINA, 69, Director since 2007
		Mr. Codina’s extensive expertise in commercial real estate development and management provides our Board with significant insight into and understanding of the real estate issues faced by a large retail organization. Mr. Codina founded Codina Group, a South Florida-based commercial real estate firm, in 1980. As Codina Group’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, he led the company through significant growth for 26 years and successfully merged it with Florida East Coast Industries in 2006 to become Florida East Coast Industries’ full-service real estate business, Flagler Development Group. In 2006, Mr. Codina was appointed Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Flagler Development Group, where he served until September 2008. He continued to serve as non-executive Chairman of Flagler until December 2010. Mr. Codina is currently the Chairman of Codina Partners, LLC, a real estate investment and development company that he formed in 2009, and he also served as its Chief Executive Officer until December 2013. In addition to serving as Chairman of his core real estate holdings, Mr. Codina is an active investor in and owner of MBB Auto Group, a premium luxury retail automotive group consisting of 12 dealerships in the Northeast. Prior to founding Codina Group, Mr. Codina served as President of Professional Automated Services, Inc., a pioneer in the development of comprehensive medical management systems that provided data processing services to physicians. Mr. Codina’s deep roots in Florida have afforded the Board a unique insight into this market. In addition, Mr. Codina’s service on a number of public company boards of directors provides significant and valuable perspective into corporate management and board dynamics.   Other U.S. Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years   AMR Corporation (1995-2013)

 

16		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(ITEM 1 ON THE PROXY CARD)

 

 

HELENA B. FOULKES, 51, Director since 2013
		Having served in a number of executive marketing, operations and strategic planning roles for CVS Health Corporation (“CVS”), an integrated pharmacy health care provider and retailer, Ms. Foulkes brings to our Board significant experience in innovative marketing strategies, retail operations and merchandising, as well as insight into health care and associate wellness-related issues. She is currently Executive Vice President of CVS and President of CVS/pharmacy, a position she has held since January 2014. Previously, she was Executive Vice President and Chief Health Care Strategy and Marketing Officer from 2011 to 2013, Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer from 2009 to 2011, Senior Vice President of Health Services of CVS/pharmacy from 2007 to 2009, Senior Vice President, Marketing and Operations Services during a portion of 2007, and Senior Vice President, Advertising and Marketing from 2002 to 2007. In her 20-plus years with the CVS, Ms. Foulkes also has held positions in Marketing and Operations Services, Strategic Planning, Visual Merchandising and Category Management.   Other U.S. Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years   None.
LINDA R. GOODEN, 62, Director since 2015
		Ms. Gooden brings to our Board her strong leadership capability demonstrated through her various senior leadership positions at Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed”). She has an extensive background in information technology (“IT”) and cybersecurity, significant operations and strategic planning expertise, and experience in business restructuring, finance and risk management. Ms. Gooden served as Executive Vice President, Information Systems & Global Solutions (“IS&GS”) of Lockheed from 2007 to 2013. Under her leadership as Executive Vice President of IS&GS, Lockheed expanded its IT capabilities beyond government customers to international and commercial markets. She also served as Lockheed’s Deputy Executive Vice President, Information and Technology Services from October to December 2006 and its President, Information Technology from 1997 to December 2006. In her role as President of Lockheed’s IT division, Ms. Gooden grew the business over a 10-year period to become a multi-billion dollar business. She also brings to our Board her experience as a director at other public companies, particularly in the areas of finance, audit, strategic investments, acquisitions and divestitures, and she serves as an “audit committee financial expert” on our Audit Committee, as described in the “Audit Committee Report” on page 21 of this Proxy Statement.   Other U.S. Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years   Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (2009 to present) General Motors Company (2015 to present) WGL Holdings, Inc. (2013 to present)

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		17

---

Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(ITEM 1 ON THE PROXY CARD)

 

 

WAYNE M. HEWETT, 51, Director since 2014
		Mr. Hewett brings to our Board extensive experience in general management, finance, supply chain, operational and international matters. He has significant experience executing company-wide initiatives across large organizations, developing proprietary products, optimizing a supply chain, and using emerging technologies to provide new products and services to customers. Mr. Hewett is currently Chief Executive Officer of Klöckner Pentaplast Group, a leading supplier of plastic films for pharmaceutical, medical devices, food, electronics, packaging, printing and specialty applications, a position he has held since August 2015. From 2010 to February 2015, Mr. Hewett served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the board of directors of Arysta LifeScience Corporation (“Arysta”), one of the world’s largest privately held crop protection and life science companies. In February 2015, Arysta was acquired by Platform Specialty Products Corporation (“Platform”), a global producer of high technology specialty chemical products and provider of technical services, and Mr. Hewett served as President of Platform until August 2015. Prior to joining Arysta in 2009, Mr. Hewett served as a senior consultant to GenNx360, a private equity firm focused on sponsoring buyouts of middle market companies, from February to August 2009. Mr. Hewett’s career has also included over 20 years with General Electric Company (“GE”), including roles as GE’s Vice-President, Supply Chain and Operations; President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Advanced Materials; President of GE Plastics Pacific; and membership on GE’s Corporate Executive Council.   Other U.S. Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years   Ingredion Incorporated (2010-2015) Platform Specialty Products Corporation (2015)
KAREN L. KATEN, 66, Director since 2007
		Ms. Katen enhances our Board’s understanding of international, supply chain and marketing matters, with her expertise in those areas gained through her career at Pfizer Inc., a global pharmaceutical company. Ms. Katen began her career at Pfizer in 1974 and held a series of management positions with increasing responsibility, including President of Pfizer Global Pharmaceuticals and Executive Vice President of Pfizer Inc. from 2001 to 2005 and President of Pfizer Human Health from 2005 to 2007. She retired in 2007 as Vice Chairman of Pfizer Inc. She also served as Chairman of the Pfizer Foundation, a charitable foundation affiliated with Pfizer. Currently, Ms. Katen serves as Senior Advisor of Essex Woodlands Health Ventures, a healthcare venture capital firm which she joined in 2007. Ms. Katen is also a director of Air Liquide, an international leader in gases for industry, health and the environment, and she serves with several healthcare-related organizations, including as chair of the RAND Corporation’s Health Board of Advisors and as a member of the Takeda Global Advisory Board. She is also on the Board of Trustees of the University of Chicago and is a council member of the Booth Graduate School of Business at the University of Chicago. Ms. Katen has also served on a variety of international policy bodies, including as Chairman of the U.S.-Japan Business Council.   Other U.S. Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years   Harris Corporation (1994 to present) IMS Health Holdings, Inc. (2015 to present) Catamaran Corporation (2012-2015)

 

18		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(ITEM 1 ON THE PROXY CARD)

 

 

CRAIG A. MENEAR, 58, Director since 2014
		As our Chief Executive Officer and President since November 2014 and our Chairman since February 2015, Mr. Menear brings to our Board extensive retail experience and knowledge of our business, including leadership experience in retail operations, merchandising, supply chain and vendor management. He previously served as our President, U.S. Retail from February 2014 to October 2014. In that role Mr. Menear was responsible for oversight of store operations and all merchandising departments, services and strategy; the Company’s supply chain network and global sourcing and vendor management programs; and the Company’s marketing and online business activities. Mr. Menear has more than three decades of experience in the retail and hardware home improvement industry. From 2007 to February 2014, Mr. Menear served as our Executive Vice President – Merchandising, where he led our merchandising and supply chain transformations. From 2003 to 2007, he served as Senior Vice President – Merchandising, and from 1997 to 2003, he held several positions of increasing responsibility in the Company’s Merchandising department, including Merchandising Vice President of Hardware, Merchandising Vice President of the Southwest Division and Divisional Merchandise Manager of the Southwest Division. Prior to joining the Company in 1997, Mr. Menear held various merchandising positions within the retail industry with companies such as IKEA, Builders Emporium, Grace Home Centers and Montgomery Ward, as well as operating an independent retail business.   Other U.S. Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years   None.
MARK VADON, 46, Director since 2012
		Mr. Vadon is one of the country’s leading internet retailing entrepreneurs, having co-founded two highly successful online specialty retail businesses. He brings to our Board in-depth experience in developing online businesses, effectively managing the use of technology, developing mobile applications and the associated user interfaces, as well as critical business analytic acumen. His expertise is an invaluable resource for the Company as we continue to implement our interconnected retail strategy. In 2009, Mr. Vadon co-founded zulily, Inc., a daily deals site for moms, babies and kids, and served as the Chairman of its board of directors until zulily was acquired by Liberty Interactive Corporation in 2015. In 1999, Mr. Vadon founded Blue Nile, Inc., the leading online retailer of diamonds and fine jewelry, and served as the Chairman of its board of directors from its inception through 2013. During Blue Nile’s history, Mr. Vadon has also served as its Executive Chairman (from 2008 to 2011), Chief Executive Officer (from 1999 to 2008) and President (from 1999 to 2007). Prior to founding Blue Nile, Mr. Vadon was a consultant for Bain & Company, a management consulting firm, which he joined in 1992.   Other U.S. Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years   Liberty Interactive Corporation (2015 to present) Blue Nile, Inc. (1999-2013) zulily, Inc. (2013-2015)

WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH

NOMINEE TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		19

---

Table of Contents

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP

(ITEM 2 ON THE PROXY CARD)

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, evaluation and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. As part of this responsibility, the Audit Committee annually evaluates the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence and assesses whether to continue to retain the firm or select a different firm.

The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for Fiscal 2016. KPMG (or its predecessor firms) has served in that capacity for the Company since 1979. The Audit Committee and its Chair are also involved in and approve the selection of the lead audit partner, who is limited to no more than five consecutive years in that role before the position must be rotated in accordance with SEC rules.

The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of KPMG as the Company’s independent auditor is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Although we are not required to submit this matter to shareholders, the Board believes that it is a sound corporate governance practice to seek shareholder ratification of the appointment of KPMG. If shareholders do not ratify the appointment of KPMG, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment.

One or more representatives of KPMG will be present at the Meeting. The representatives will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire and will be available to respond to questions from shareholders.

WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF

KPMG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S FISCAL 2016 INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.

 

20		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Each member of the Audit Committee is independent under SEC rules, the NYSE listing standards and the Director Independence Standards set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement. The Board has determined that Mr. Brown and Ms. Gooden are “audit committee financial experts” as such term is defined in SEC rules.

The Audit Committee acts under a written charter, which sets forth its responsibilities and duties, as well as requirements for the Audit Committee’s composition and meetings. The Audit Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at http://corporategovernance.homedepot.com/committees and is also available in print upon request.

The Audit Committee has:

 

•

Reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements with the Company’s management and discussed with KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm for the Company, the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees;

•

Received from KPMG the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMG’s independence, discussed with KPMG its independence, and concluded that KPMG is independent from the Company and its management;

•

After review and discussions with management and KPMG, recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for the Company be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2015 for filing with the SEC; and

•

Reviewed and discussed the fees billed to the Company by KPMG for audit, audit-related, tax and all other services provided during Fiscal 2015, which are set forth below under “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fees,” and determined that the provision of non-audit services is compatible with KPMG’s independence.

This report has been furnished by the current members of the Audit Committee:

 

•

J. Frank Brown, Chair

•

Ari Bousbib

•

Linda R. Gooden

•

Wayne M. Hewett

•

Mark Vadon

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		21

---

Table of Contents

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S FEES

AUDIT AND OTHER FEES

 

The following table presents fees billed or expected to be billed for services rendered by KPMG during Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 (amounts in thousands):

 

		Fiscal 2015				Fiscal 2014
Audit Fees		$	5,464			$	4,850
Audit-Related Fees			200				317
Tax Fees			586				360
All Other Fees			–				–
Total Fees		$	6,250			$	5,527

Audit fees consist of fees for the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K, the annual audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, the quarterly reviews of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, services related to other regulatory filings made with the SEC, comfort letters and statutory audits of certain subsidiaries.

Audit-related fees consist of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the consolidated financial statements but are not reported in the prior paragraph. These fees are related to the Company’s employee benefit plan audits.

Tax fees for Fiscal 2015 consist of fees of $447,000 for tax compliance and preparation services and fees of $139,000 for tax planning, advisory and consulting services. Tax fees for Fiscal 2014 consist of fees of $285,000 for tax compliance and preparation services and fees of $75,000 for tax planning, advisory and consulting services.

PRE-APPROVAL POLICY AND PROCEDURES

 

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy regarding the retention of the independent registered public accounting firm that requires pre-approval of all services by the Audit Committee or by the Chair of the Audit Committee. Prior to the engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm, our Audit Committee pre-approves the above-described services by category of service. During the year, circumstances may arise when it may become necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval or for services in excess of the originally pre-approved amount. In those instances, our Audit Committee requires that we obtain specific pre-approval for those services. If pre-approval is required between Audit Committee meetings, the Chair of the Audit Committee may pre-approve the services, provided that notice of such pre-approval is given to the other members of the Audit Committee and presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

 

22		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(ITEM 3 ON THE PROXY CARD)

In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Company provides its shareholders with the opportunity each year to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. The Company recommends that you vote for the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, you may vote on the following resolution at the Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

As described in our “Fiscal 2015 Executive Compensation Report Card” and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 28, the Company’s compensation philosophy is to align executive pay with Company performance. We believe that this alignment motivates our executives to achieve our key financial and strategic goals, creating long-term shareholder value.

Our executive compensation program links pay to performance as follows:

 

		ü		Approximately 88% of the Fiscal 2015 target compensation for our CEO and approximately 81% of the Fiscal 2015 target compensation for our other named executive officers was variable and paid based upon attainment of our pre-determined corporate performance objectives or the performance of our common stock.
		ü		For Fiscal 2015, approximately 64% of our CEO’s target compensation and approximately 59% of the target compensation of our other named executive officers was equity-based and paid in a balanced mix of performance-based restricted stock, options and performance shares.
		ü		Our named executive officers do not receive tax reimbursements (also known as “gross-ups”), supplemental executive retirement plans, defined benefit pension plans, guaranteed salary increases or guaranteed bonuses and have limited perquisites.
		ü		We employ a number of mechanisms to mitigate the chance of our compensation programs encouraging excessive risk taking, including an annual review and risk assessment of all elements of compensation by the LDC Committee, a compensation recoupment policy, stock ownership guidelines, and an anti-hedging policy.

Because the vote on this proposal is advisory in nature, it will not affect any compensation already paid or awarded to any named executive officer and will not be binding on or overrule any decisions by the LDC Committee or the Board. Because we value our shareholders’ views, however, the LDC Committee and the Board will consider the results of this advisory vote when formulating future executive compensation policy. As noted on page 33 in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the LDC Committee considered the result of last year’s vote, in which over 97% of the shares voted were voted in support of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Your advisory vote serves as an additional tool to guide the LDC Committee and the Board in continuing to align the Company’s executive compensation program with the interests of the Company and its shareholders and is consistent with our commitment to high standards of corporate governance.

This vote is not intended to express a view on any specific element of compensation, but rather the overall named executive officer compensation program and philosophy as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure as set forth below under “Executive Compensation.” We encourage you to carefully review these disclosures and to indicate your support for our named executive officer compensation program.

WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS PRESENTED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		23

---

Table of Contents

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING EMPLOYMENT DIVERSITY REPORT

(ITEM 4 ON THE PROXY CARD)

Benedictine Sisters, Boerne, Texas, located at 285 Oblate Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78216, are the beneficial owners of more than $2,000 in shares of the Company’s common stock and have notified the Company of their intention to present the following proposal at the Meeting as lead proponent along with other co-proponents, the names and addresses of whom we will provide upon written or oral request. The Company is not responsible for the accuracy or content of the proposal, which is presented as received from the proponents in accordance with SEC rules.

WHEREAS: Equal employment opportunity (EEO) is a fair employment practice and an investment issue. We believe companies with good EEO records have a competitive advantage in recruiting/retaining employees. We believe Home Depot customers are increasingly diverse. A diverse work force is more likely to anticipate and respond effectively to consumer demand.

EEO practices have economic relevance. Home Depot annually files an EEO-1 report with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. This information could be made available to shareholders at a minimal additional cost. In 2001, Home Depot began providing EEO information to investors upon request. Since then, Home Depot reversed policy on disclosure of this information.

Allegations of discrimination in the workplace burden shareholders with costly litigation/fines which can damage a company’s reputation.

Home Depot has paid out more than $100 million to settle discrimination lawsuits in the last 16 years. The most costly EEOC settlement was $87 million in 1997. In 2004, Home Depot agreed to pay $5.5 million to settle charges of class-wide gender, race and national origin discrimination at 30 Colorado stores. In 2006, Home Depot paid $125,000 to settle a racial harassment/retaliation lawsuit that alleged Home Depot subjected a former lumberman/forklift operator to a racially hostile work environment and fired him in retaliation for complaining. In 2009, Home Depot paid $84,750 to settle retaliation charges related to a 2004 discrimination suit.

In 2012, Home Depot faced additional controversies. In April, the company settled a suit brought by the Department of Justice for allegedly violating the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994. In September, Home Depot paid $100,000 to settle a lawsuit filed by the EEOC charging failure to provide reasonable accommodation for a worker diagnosed with cancer.

RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Home Depot prepare a diversity report, at reasonable cost and omitting confidential information, available to investors by September 2016, including the following:

1. A chart identifying employees according to their gender and race in each of the nine major EEOC-defined job categories for the last three years, listing numbers or percentages in each category;

2. A summary description of any affirmative action policies and programs to improve performance, including job categories where women and minorities are underutilized;

3.  A description of policies/programs oriented toward increasing diversity in the workplace.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT:

In 2013, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reported racial minorities comprised 35.9 percent of the private industry workforce, but just 12.2 percent of executives and managers. Likewise, women represented 47.8 percent of the workforce, but just 29.2 percent of executives and managers.

We agree with a recommendation of the 1995 bipartisan Glass Ceiling Commission that “public disclosure of diversity data—specifically data on the most senior positions—is an effective incentive to develop and maintain innovative, effective programs to break the glass ceiling barriers.” Home Depot has demonstrated leadership on many corporate social responsibility issues. We ask the company to again demonstrate leadership in diversity by committing to EEO disclosure.

 

24		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

RESPONSE TO PROPOSAL REGARDING EMPLOYMENT DIVERSITY REPORT

The Board recommends that you vote against this shareholder proposal. Shareholders of the Company have rejected this proposal at thirteen previous annual meetings. One of the Company’s core values is Respect for All People, and we strive to foster a culture that encourages, supports, leverages and values diversity and inclusion. We are committed to maintaining a diverse and inclusive environment for our associates. Our overall human resources strategy is to attract, retain and develop diverse talent, which ensures that the composition of our customers and our communities are reflected and represented in our Company. Our commitment to diversity is reflected in the makeup of our senior leadership team and our Board of Directors. We have also taken a number of steps to align our diversity initiatives within our strategic framework, including the following:

 

•

We use an employment marketing strategy that enables us to source and recruit diverse associates through such avenues as national and local career fairs, social media, and multilingual ads and flyers.

•

We maintain a diversity microsite on The Home Depot careers website, available at careers.homedepot.com > Our Culture > Diversity, which provides potential candidates with insight into our diversity initiatives as well as a unique perspective into our diverse and inclusive culture and workforce.

•

We partner with several diverse national organizations, such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), National Urban League, Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility and the National Association of Chinese Americans, to promote community involvement and both attract and retain diverse talent.

•

Our internal communication strategy includes diversity and inclusion messaging focused on increasing cultural awareness and reiterating the importance of diversity and inclusion as core values. This includes focused communications in our stores and featured articles on our internal website showcasing associate accomplishments and opportunities for growth and development.

•

We engage our associates through our seven Associate Resource Groups (“ARGs”). The ARGs consist of teams of associates focusing on various aspects of diversity who are committed to supporting the Company’s business objectives and driving associate engagement through professional development, cultural awareness and community outreach. Our current ARGs are organized around the following groups: African-American, Disabled, Hispanic/Latino, LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered), Military, Pan-Asian and Women.

•

In addition to our ARGs, we develop our leaders’ capabilities through our Women in Leadership program, which is available to both our female and male associates. This program focuses on providing key leadership skills, business acumen and access to resources to support career development.

•

Our diversity and inclusion training includes four videos for all Company leaders that reinforce our commitment to a diverse and inclusive workforce.

•

We provide a dedicated hotline to promote the anonymous reporting of concerns regarding conduct that violates the Company’s Business Code of Conduct and Ethics.

We maintain a team of associates led by our Director – Diversity and Inclusion that provides focused leadership in developing a diverse and inclusive work environment in which all associates are valued, respected, encouraged and supported to do their best work. The Company does not believe adoption of this proposal would enhance its commitment to equal opportunity in any meaningful way.

WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU

VOTE “AGAINST” THE ADOPTION OF

THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		25

---

Table of Contents

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS

(ITEM 5 ON THE PROXY CARD)

Mr. John Chevedden, located at 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, is the beneficial owner of at least 100 shares of the Company’s common stock and has notified the Company of his intention to present the following proposal at the Meeting. The Company is not responsible for the accuracy or content of the proposal, which is presented as received from the proponent in accordance with SEC rules.

Proposal 5 – Special Shareowner Meetings

Resolved, Shareowners ask our board to take the steps necessary (unilaterally if possible) to amend our bylaws and each appropriate governing document to give holders in the aggregate of 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareowner meeting. This proposal does not impact our board’s current power to call a special meeting.

Delaware law allows 10% of shareholders to call a special meeting and many companies have adopted the 10% threshold. Special meetings allow shareowners to vote on important matters, such as electing new directors that can arise between annual meetings. Shareowner input on the timing of shareowner meetings is especially important when events unfold quickly and issues may become moot by the next annual meeting.

This proposal topic won more than 70% support at Edwards Lifesciences and SunEdison in 2013. Vanguard sent letters to 350 of its portfolio companies asking them to consider providing the right for shareholders to call a special meeting.

This proposal is more important to Home Depot shareholders due to the restrictions on the Home Depot shareholder right to act by written consent. This proposal is also more important to Home Depot shareholders depending on whether Home Depot adopts a shareholder right to proxy access, as many companies are doing prior to 2016 annual meetings, that represents best practices from a shareholder perspective.

Please vote to enhance shareholder value:

Special Shareowner Meetings – Proposal 5

 

26		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

RESPONSE TO PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS

The Board recommends that you vote against this shareholder proposal. Currently, shareholders of 25% of our common stock have the right to call a special meeting, pursuant to a Company proposal adopted by our shareholders at our 2009 annual meeting. Our shareholders have been asked to vote on a proposal lowering the threshold in three of the last four years – to 10% in 2015 and to 15% in 2012 and 2014 – and each time, our shareholders have rejected allowing a smaller minority of shareholders to call a special meeting. Our Board of Directors continues to believe that 25% is an appropriate threshold, particularly when viewed together with our robust corporate governance practices and the many shareholder protections that we have adopted.

As noted in our Corporate Governance Factsheet, located on our Corporate Governance website (http://corporategovernance.homedepot.com/factsheet), in addition to a shareholder right to call a special meeting, we have adopted extensive governance best practices. We provide our shareholders with a proxy access right, which we adopted earlier this year, as well as majority voting for directors, annual director elections and a shareholder right to act by majority written consent. In 2014, 2015 and 2016, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) gave us its highest ranking of “1” under its QuickScore governance rating system, reflecting its conclusion that our corporate governance risk is low.

If adopted, this proposal would have the effect of allowing a relatively small minority of shareholders with narrow interests to call an unlimited number of special meetings to consider matters that may not be in the best interests of all of our shareholders. We believe that at least 25% of our shareholders should agree that a matter be addressed before a special meeting is called. Therefore, in the best interests of our shareholders and Company and in light of the many shareholder protections we already have in place, we recommend that you vote against this shareholder proposal.

WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU

VOTE “AGAINST” THE ADOPTION OF

THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		27

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

FISCAL 2015 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT CARD: THE HOME DEPOT PAYS FOR PERFORMANCE

Our executive compensation program aligns pay with performance. Approximately 88% of our CEO’s target compensation for Fiscal 2015 (approximately 81% on average for our other named executive officers, or “NEOs”) was at risk and contingent upon the achievement of corporate performance objectives and/or share price performance. The components of total target compensation for Fiscal 2015 were:

 

Below are the variable components of Fiscal 2015 total target compensation, including the performance measures used for each, the actual Company performance in Fiscal 2015 relevant to those measures, and the resulting compensation paid to our NEOs.

 

Fiscal 2015 Performance Measures		Fiscal 2015 Company Performance		Fiscal 2015 Executive Compensation  Results

Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”):

 

 

 

Fiscal 2015-2017 Performance Share Award:

 

 

 

Performance-Based Restricted Stock:

 

 

 

Stock Options:

 

 

 

 

28		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

Fiscal 2015 Company Business Objectives and Performance

Our strategic framework in Fiscal 2015 reflected an evolution of the three-legged stool strategy that we have employed over the past several years, with a focus on the following core principles aimed at driving shareholder return and a sustainable competitive advantage:

 

•

Customer Experience, aimed at connecting service to customer needs and connecting stores to website and website to stores;

•

Product Authority for home improvement, aimed at connecting assortment to local needs and connecting merchandise from supplier to shelf to customer;

•

Capital Allocation driving productivity and efficiency and connecting activities to cost efficiency; and

•

Interconnecting Retail, tying the three legs of the stool together to reflect our end-to-end approach to offering our customers the products that they want through the most effective channels in the most efficient manner.

By executing against the strategic initiatives that support these principles, our business performed well in Fiscal 2015. Highlights of the Company’s Fiscal 2015 performance include the following:

 

•

Increased net sales by 6.4% to $88.5 billion;

•

Increased operating income by 12.5% to $11.8 billion;

•

Increased diluted earnings per share by 15.9% to $5.46;

•

Generated $9.4 billion in operating cash flow; and

•

Increased return on invested capital (“ROIC”) from 24.9% to 28.0%.

As a result of our significant cash flow from operations and disciplined capital allocation, we were also able to return value to our shareholders during Fiscal 2015 through a 20% increase in our stock price, a 26% increase in our quarterly dividend for a total of $3.0 billion in dividends, and $7.0 billion in share repurchases.

Named Executive Officers

Our named executive officers for Fiscal 2015 were:

 

•

Craig A. Menear, Chairman, CEO and President;

•

Carol B. Tomé, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Executive Vice President – Corporate Services;

•

Matthew A. Carey, Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer;

•

Mark Q. Holifield, Executive Vice President – Supply Chain and Product Development; and

•

Marc D. Powers, former Executive Vice President – U.S. Stores, who served in this role until January 31, 2016, the last day of Fiscal 2015.

In Fiscal 2015, all of the Executive Vice Presidents listed above reported directly to the CEO.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives: Pay for Performance

We designed our compensation program for associates at all levels with the intent to align pay with performance. By doing so, we seek to motivate associate performance and enhance morale, which drives a superior customer experience. We believe this alignment encourages achievement of our strategic goals and creation of long-term shareholder value.

The principal elements of our compensation program for executive officers are base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives. The amount of incentive compensation paid, if any, is determined by our performance against our Fiscal 2015 business plan, a plan intended to be challenging in light of prevailing economic conditions, yet attainable through disciplined execution of our strategic initiatives.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		29

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The following features of our compensation program for executive officers illustrate our performance-based compensation philosophy and our practice of following compensation best practices:

 

ü

100% of annual incentive compensation under our Fiscal 2015 MIP was tied to performance against pre-established, specific, measurable financial performance goals.

ü

One-third of the annual Fiscal 2015 equity grant was in the form of a three-year performance share award with payout contingent on achieving pre-established average ROIC and operating profit targets over the three-year performance period.

ü

Our performance-based restricted stock awards, which also comprised one-third of the annual Fiscal 2015 equity grant, were forfeitable if Fiscal 2015 operating profit had been less than 90% of the MIP target. Dividends on performance-based restricted stock grants are accrued and not paid out to executive officers unless and until the performance goal is met.

ü

Our equity awards have longer vesting periods than many of our peers, with the performance-based restricted stock and stock options vesting over five years and the performance shares cliff vesting after three years (subject to achievement of performance goals), which better aligns executive officers’ interests with the interests of our shareholders in the long-term performance of the Company.

ü

Approximately 88% of our CEO’s total target compensation was tied to the achievement of corporate performance objectives and share price performance.

ü

We do not provide tax reimbursements, also known as “gross-ups,” to executive officers; we have limited perquisites; and we do not have any supplemental executive retirement plans, defined benefit pension plans, guaranteed salary increases or guaranteed bonuses.

ü

We prohibit all associates, officers and directors from entering into hedging or monetization transactions designed to limit the financial risk of owning Company stock.

Impact of Fiscal 2015 Business Results on Executive Compensation

The compensation earned by our named executive officers in Fiscal 2015 reflects our corporate performance for the fiscal year:

 

•

The LDC Committee approved salary increases for the named executive officers based on its assessment of individual performance and other factors, as discussed in more detail below;

•

Reflecting our execution against our business plan and strategic initiatives, our MIP paid out in excess of the target performance level;

•

The performance condition on the performance-based restricted stock granted in Fiscal 2015 was satisfied, although the shares still remain subject to service-based vesting requirements; and

•

The named executive officers earned approximately 138.2% of their 2013-2015 performance share award because we achieved average ROIC and operating profit over the three-year performance period of 17.3% and $10.56 billion, respectively, reflecting performance in excess of the target level for each metric.

Fiscal 2015 Non-Management Compensation

Compensation of our non-management associates in Fiscal 2015 aligned with our philosophy of taking care of our store associates and motivating our associates to deliver a superior customer experience. Non-management associates participate in our Success Sharing bonus program, which provides semi-annual cash awards for performance against our business plan, including sales plan and productivity goals. In addition, these associates are eligible to earn awards for superior performance and customer service at the individual, store and district levels. Due to the outstanding performance of our non-management associates in Fiscal 2015, we made substantial payouts under our Success Sharing program, with 100% of stores qualifying for Success Sharing in each of the first and second halves of Fiscal 2015. This resulted in total Success Sharing bonus payments to our non-management associates of approximately $244 million for Fiscal 2015 performance. We also established a 2.5% merit increase budget for our associates in Fiscal 2015, and we made matching contributions under the FutureBuilder 401(k) Plan. In addition, we provided a variety of recognition and teambuilding awards to recognize and reward top-performing store associates and support store morale.

 

30		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Opportunity for Shareholder Feedback

The LDC Committee carefully considers feedback from our shareholders regarding executive compensation matters. Shareholders are invited to express their views or concerns directly to the LDC Committee or the Board in the manner described above under “Communicating with the Board” on page  11 of this Proxy Statement.

COMPENSATION DETERMINATION PROCESS

 

 

Participant				Role in the Executive Compensation Determination Process
LDC Committee		•		The LDC Committee evaluates the performance and determines the compensation of our executive officers other than the CEO.
		•		The LDC Committee evaluates the CEO’s performance and makes recommendations to the independent members of the Board regarding compensation for the CEO.
		•		The LDC Committee may delegate its responsibilities to subcommittees, but did not delegate any of its authority with respect to the compensation of any executive officer for Fiscal 2015.
Independent Members of the Board		•		The independent members of the Board, consisting of all directors other than Mr. Menear, evaluate the performance and determine the compensation of the CEO.
Executive Officers		•		The Executive Vice President – Human Resources (“EVP-HR”) made recommendations to the LDC Committee as to the amount and form of executive compensation for executive officers other than the CEO and himself.
		•		The CEO has input on the recommendations to the LDC Committee with respect to the compensation of all of our executive officers (other than himself).
		•		At the request of the LDC Committee, both the EVP-HR and the CEO regularly attend LDC Committee meetings, excluding executive sessions where their respective compensation and other matters are discussed.
Independent Compensation Consultant		•		In November 2014, the LDC Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC as its independent compensation consultant for Fiscal 2015 to provide research, market data, survey information and design expertise in developing executive and director compensation programs. Pay Governance provides consulting services solely to compensation committees.
		•		A representative of Pay Governance attended LDC Committee meetings in Fiscal 2015 and advised the LDC Committee on all principal aspects of executive compensation, including the competitiveness of program design and award values and specific analyses with respect to the Company’s executive officers, including the CEO. The compensation consultant reports directly to the LDC Committee, and the LDC Committee is free to replace the consultant or hire additional consultants or advisers at any time.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		31

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Participant				Role in the Executive Compensation Determination Process
Independent Compensation Consultant (continued)		•		Pursuant to the independent compensation consultant policy adopted by the LDC Committee, its compensation consultant provides services solely to the LDC Committee and is prohibited from providing services or products of any kind to the Company. Further, affiliates of the compensation consultant may not receive payments from the Company that would exceed 2% of the consolidated gross revenues of the compensation consultant and its affiliates during any year.
		•		Pay Governance provided services solely to the LDC Committee in Fiscal 2015, and none of its affiliates provided any services to the Company. In addition, under the independent compensation consultant policy, the LDC Committee assessed Pay Governance’s independence and whether its work raised any conflicts of interest, taking into consideration the independence factors set forth in applicable SEC and NYSE rules. Based on that assessment, including review of a letter from Pay Governance addressing each of those factors, the LDC Committee determined that Pay Governance was independent and that its work did not raise any conflicts of interest.

Benchmarking

We do not target any specific peer group percentile ranking for total compensation or for any particular component of compensation for our named executive officers. The LDC Committee considers each executive’s compensation history and peer group market position as reference points in awarding annual compensation. For our CEO, the LDC Committee considered data provided by Pay Governance from two peer groups. The first consisted of the Fortune 50 companies, excluding certain financial services and other companies due to their unique compensation structure.¹ This group reflects companies of similar size and complexity to us. The second group, listed below, consisted of retailers with revenues greater than $10 billion with whom we compete for executive talent.

 

Retail Peer Group
AutoNation, Inc.		Family Dollar Stores, Inc.		Murphy USA, Inc.		Staples, Inc.
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.		Genuine Parts Company		Nordstrom, Inc.		SuperValu Inc.
Best Buy Co., Inc.		J. C. Penney Company, Inc.		Office Depot, Inc.		Target Corporation
CarMax Inc.		Kohl’s Corporation		Penske Automotive Group, Inc.		The Gap, Inc.
Costco Wholesale Corporation		L Brands, Inc.		Rite Aid Corp.		The Kroger Co.
CST Brands, Inc.		Liberty Interactive Corporation		Ross Stores, Inc.		The TJX Companies Inc.
CVS Health Corporation		Lowe’s Companies, Inc.		Safeway, Inc.		Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Dollar General Corporation		Macy’s, Inc.		Sears Holding Corporation		Whole Foods Market, Inc.

The retail peer group remained largely unchanged from Fiscal 2014. We added Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Family Dollar Stores, Inc. and Ross Stores, Inc., each of which met the relevant criteria based on fiscal 2014 revenue. We also removed Sysco Corp. from the peer group due to a lack of direct to consumer sales and Walgreen Co. due to its merger in late 2014 with Alliance Boots GmbH.

 

1

The excluded companies were American International Group, Inc., Bank of America Corporation, Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Citigroup Inc., Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, JP Morgan Chase & Co., State Farm and Wells Fargo & Company. Walgreen Co. was also excluded due to its merger in late 2014 with Alliance Boots GmbH, and Amazon.com, Inc. and Google Inc. were excluded due to the atypical compensation structures of their founder/CEOs.

 

32		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

In reviewing the benchmarking data in connection with setting Mr. Menear’s Fiscal 2015 compensation, our LDC Committee and the independent directors also reviewed the percentile ranking of our revenues and Mr. Menear’s target total compensation compared to each of these peer groups, as reflected below:

 

Category		Percentile Rank
		Fortune 50					Retail Peers
Company Revenue*				34	%				88	%
CEO Target Total Compensation				14	%				64	%

 

*

Based on fiscal 2014 revenue as reported in SEC filings.

For our other named executive officers, the LDC Committee considers data from the Hay Group’s Retail Industry Total Remuneration Survey, which provides information and comparisons on compensation for executive and industry specific positions at the corporate and division level of retail companies. This survey data helps the LDC Committee understand the competitive market for the industry in which the Company principally competes for retail-specific talent and for customers.

Mitigating Compensation Risk

In November 2014, the LDC Committee undertook its annual broad-based review and risk assessment of the Company’s compensation policies and practices for its associates for Fiscal 2015. Based on that assessment, the LDC Committee determined that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In reaching that conclusion, management and the LDC Committee evaluated each key element of our compensation plans and practices for our executive officers and associates against the following factors identified as part of our risk assessment process:

 

ü

Performance/payment time horizons are appropriate and not overweight in short-term incentives.

ü

The relationship between the incremental achievement levels and corresponding payouts in our incentive plans is appropriate, and all incentives, other than equity incentives that are tied to growth in our share price, have payout caps.

ü

Non-management associates participate in our Success Sharing bonus program, which provides semi-annual cash awards for performance against our business plan, including sales plan and productivity goals. In addition, these associates are eligible to earn awards for superior performance and customer service at the individual, store and district levels.

ü

Programs employ a reasonable mix of performance metrics and are not concentrated on a single metric. Although the operating profit metric is used in more than one incentive, it is a key corporate goal, and the risk of overweighting it is mitigated by using it across different time horizons.

ü

Criteria for payments are closely aligned with our strategic goals, financial plan and shareholder interests.

ü

Payout curves are reasonable and do not contain steep “cliffs” that might encourage unreasonable short-term business decisions to achieve payment thresholds.

ü

Equity for senior officers is paid in a balanced mix of performance-based restricted stock, performance shares and stock options; other associates receive equity in the form of service-based restricted stock.

ü

Bonus, incentive and equity awards to executive officers are subject to a recoupment policy, as described below on page 39, to discourage manipulation of incentive program elements.

ü

Stock ownership guidelines are in place to further align the interests of shareholders and executive officers, as described below on page 40.

Consideration of Last Year’s Advisory Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation

At our annual meeting of shareholders on May 21, 2015, over 97% of the shares voted were voted in support of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Since then, as part of our regular interaction with our institutional shareholders, we have continued to request input on our compensation practices. In considering the results of the 2015 advisory vote on executive compensation

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		33

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

and feedback from these shareholders, the LDC Committee concluded that the compensation paid to our executive officers and the Company’s overall executive pay practices have strong shareholder support and therefore determined to maintain the current overall compensation structure for Fiscal 2016.

At our 2011 annual meeting, our shareholders expressed a preference that advisory votes on executive compensation occur every year, as recommended by our Board. Consistent with this preference, the Board implemented an annual advisory vote on executive compensation until the next advisory vote on the frequency of shareholder votes on executive compensation, which will occur no later than the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders in 2017.

ELEMENTS OF OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAMS

 

The principal elements of our compensation programs are discussed below.

Base Salaries

We provide competitive base salaries that allow us to attract and retain a high-performing leadership team. Base salaries for our named executive officers are reviewed and generally adjusted annually based on a comprehensive management assessment process. For Fiscal 2015, following discussion with the LDC Committee and based upon a review of competitive market data, the Company’s performance in Fiscal 2014, and assessments of the Company’s business plan and anticipated economic conditions in Fiscal 2015, we determined to maintain a Company-wide 2.5% merit increase budget.

In establishing the actual base salaries for the named executive officers for Fiscal 2015, the LDC Committee considered total compensation, scope of responsibilities, performance over the previous year, experience, internal pay equity, potential to assume additional responsibilities, and the competitive marketplace. As a result of this assessment, Ms. Tomé and Messrs. Carey, Holifield and Powers received annual salary increases in April 2015 of between 2.7% – 3.4%, as set forth in the table below. When the independent members of the Board established Mr. Menear’s new base salary upon his promotion to CEO and President effective November 1, 2014, it was with the understanding that his base salary would continue at that level for Fiscal 2015, and therefore his base salary was not increased in April 2015.

 

Name		2015 Base Salary					2014 Base Salary					Percent Increase
Craig A. Menear			$	1,300,000				$	1,300,000					–
Carol B. Tomé			$	1,060,000				$	1,025,000					3.4%
Matthew A. Carey			$	715,000				$	695,000					2.9%
Mark Q. Holifield			$	760,000				$	740,000					2.7%
Marc D. Powers			$	670,000				$	650,000					3.1%

Annual Incentive

All named executive officers participate in the MIP, our cash-based annual incentive plan. The Fiscal 2015 MIP payout was contingent on the achievement of financial performance goals set by the LDC Committee at the beginning of the Fiscal 2015 performance period. The LDC Committee bases the payout on achievement of financial metrics to more directly align MIP goals with shareholder value creation and achievement of the Company’s business plan.

 

34		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Performance Goals. Set forth below are the MIP financial performance measures and the threshold, target and maximum Company achievement levels selected by the LDC Committee for Fiscal 2015 (dollars in billions):

 

Fiscal 2015 Performance Measures
Measure				Threshold						Target				Maximum
		Weighting		Goal		% of Target Goal		% of Target Payout		Goal				Goal				% of Target Goal		% of Target Payout
Sales		40%		$82.70		95%		10%		$	87.06			$	104.47			120%		200%
Operating Profit		40%		$10.35		90%		10%		$	11.50			$	13.80			120%		200%
Inventory Turns		20%		4.33		90%		10%			4.81				5.77			120%		200%

The operating profit threshold must be met for any MIP payout to occur. The relative weighting among the goals was determined by the LDC Committee with input from the CEO and the EVP-HR to reflect the Company’s priorities for Fiscal 2015. The LDC Committee aligned the weighting of the sales and operating profit goals to emphasize top line sales growth balanced with the Company’s continued focus on profitability as a means to drive bottom line results for shareholders.

Adjustments.    The pre-established definitions of sales and operating profit under the MIP provided for adjustments for the impact of acquisitions or dispositions of businesses with annualized sales of $1 billion or more and, for operating profit, nonrecurring charges and write-offs exceeding $50 million in the aggregate for specified types of strategic restructuring transactions. The LDC Committee adopted these definitions for plan purposes because it believes these types of strategic decisions support the long-term best interests of the Company and should not adversely affect incentive opportunities. The LDC Committee also included in the pre-established definitions of sales and operating profit under the MIP an adjustment to neutralize the impact of any change (positive or negative) in currency exchange rates during the fiscal year. The addition of this adjustment reflected the significant volatility in exchange rates and increase in the value of the U.S. dollar against other currencies, in particular the Canadian dollar and the Mexican peso, that began in late Fiscal 2014 and was expected to continue in Fiscal 2015. The LDC Committee noted that adjustments for currency fluctuations are not uncommon for large multi-national corporations. These fluctuations represent external, macro-economic influences outside of the control of the executive officers, and the LDC Committee believed that they should not adversely affect incentive opportunities.

The LDC Committee also had extensive discussions about the impact of the data breach experienced by the Company in the third quarter of Fiscal 2014 and its desire to structure the Fiscal 2015 MIP to maintain positive morale and team dynamics and minimize distraction created by concerns about the financial impact of the breach. The LDC Committee noted that it had not adjusted the Fiscal 2014 MIP payouts due to the breach-related costs incurred in Fiscal 2014, but recognized that the Company could not determine, at the time that the Fiscal 2015 MIP targets were established, what the Fiscal 2015 financial impact of the data breach would be. As a result of those discussions, the LDC Committee also determined to include in the operating profit definition an adjustment for the amount of any charges related to the data breach, net of any expected insurance recovery.

Payout Calculations.    For achieving the target level of performance for the Fiscal 2015 MIP, executive officers receive 100% payout. The target performance level was consistent with our 2015 business plan and the forecast disclosed at the beginning of Fiscal 2015. For Fiscal 2015, the LDC Committee set the threshold performance levels at 95%, 90% and 90% of the performance targets for the sales, operating profit and inventory measures, respectively, with a threshold payout at 10% of target. The threshold performance level encourages incremental performance even when achievement of the target appears to be unlikely. At the same time, the relatively low level of payout incentivizes performance above the threshold level.

The LDC Committee also sets maximum performance levels to incent participants to achieve and reward them for above-target performance, while at the same time capping payouts to avoid windfalls due to a

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		35

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

better than expected external environment. For Fiscal 2015, the LDC Committee set the payout for maximum achievement for the sales, operating profit and inventory turns measures at 200% of target payout, and set the maximum performance goal for those measures at 120% of the target performance goal.

The Company uses interpolation to determine the specific amount of the payout for each named executive officer with respect to the achievement of financial goals between the various levels. The LDC Committee does not have discretion to increase the MIP payout earned by a named executive officer, but it may decrease the payout even if the performance goals are achieved.

The annual target payout levels are determined as a percentage of base salary: 200% for the CEO; 125% for the CFO; and 100% for the other Executive Vice Presidents. For Messrs. Menear and Carey and Ms. Tomé, payouts for achievement of the performance goals were based on overall Company performance. For Messrs. Holifield and Powers, payouts were based upon performance of the portion of the Company’s business for which they were accountable. The specific performance levels for the portions of the Company’s business for which Messrs. Holifield and Powers were responsible are not critical to an understanding of the Company’s compensation program, and we do not believe disclosure of this information would be meaningful to shareholders since it would not be apparent how this information correlates to our consolidated financial statements.

Fiscal 2015 MIP Results.    For Fiscal 2015, for purposes of determining the achievement of MIP awards, sales were $89.27 billion, operating profit was $12.06 billion and inventory turns were 4.90 times, exceeding the target level for each goal. Pursuant to the pre-established definition of sales, sales were adjusted up by $1.35 billion for the impact of changes in currency exchange rates in Fiscal 2015 and adjusted down by $601.8 million due to the impact of the acquisition of Interline Brands, Inc. (“Interline”) in Fiscal 2015. Pursuant to the pre-established definition of operating profit under the MIP, operating profit was adjusted up by $184.3 million due to the impact of changes in currency exchange rates in Fiscal 2015, adjusted down by $29.7 million due to the acquisition of Interline in Fiscal 2015, and adjusted up by $128.0 million for the charges incurred in connection with the 2014 data breach, net of expected insurance recovery. Actual sales and operating profit without these adjustments were $88.5 billion and $11.8 billion, respectively, which also exceeded the target level for each goal.

Based on performance in Fiscal 2015 against the performance goals, the following were the target and actual MIP awards for Fiscal 2015 for each of the named executive officers:

 

Name		At Target Performance								At Actual Performance
		% of Base Salary		Dollar Amount						% of Base Salary		Dollar Amount
Craig A. Menear		200%		$	2,600,000					233.3%		$	3,033,014
Carol B. Tomé		125%		$	1,325,000					145.8%		$	1,545,671
Matthew A. Carey		100%		$	715,000					116.7%		$	834,079
Mark Q. Holifield		100%		$	760,000					117.0%		$	889,079
Marc D. Powers		100%		$	670,000					117.0%		$	783,794

Long-Term Incentives

For Fiscal 2015, we awarded the named executive officers annual long-term incentives consisting of one-third each of performance shares, performance-based restricted stock and stock options. The LDC Committee believed that this balanced mix reflects a focus on pay for performance and alignment with longer-term shareholder interests. The LDC Committee also believed that this mix of equity components provided an appropriate balance of mid- and long-term performance measures and retention incentive, without promoting excessive risk-taking.

The total value of the annual equity awards granted in March 2015 was determined by the LDC Committee after considering the value of equity grants of officers with similar responsibilities at peer group companies described under “Benchmarking” in the “Compensation Determination Process” section

 

36		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

above and individual performance relating to financial management, leadership, talent management and operational effectiveness, as well as retention risk. For Fiscal 2015, the annual equity award for our CEO at the target level was 538% of his base salary at the time the awards were granted. For the other named executive officers, the target equity value for the annual equity grant ranged from 263% to 340% of base salary.

Performance Shares.    The Fiscal 2015-2017 performance share award provides for the grant of shares of our common stock at the end of a three-year period based on the achievement of average ROIC and operating profit goals over that period, as follows (dollars in billions):

 

Fiscal 2015-2017 Performance Shares		Threshold		Target		Maximum
Three-Year Average ROIC		26.4%		29.3%		32.2%
Three-Year Average Operating Profit		$11.09		$12.32		$13.55
Percent of Target Payout		25%		100%		200%

For results between these levels, the number of shares is determined by interpolation. There is no payout for results below the threshold level. Each performance measure is separately determined and equally weighted. The pre-established definition of operating profit for each year in the performance period is the same as the one used for the MIP for that year. The pre-established definition of ROIC (a measure of after-tax operating income over the average of beginning and ending equity and long-term debt for the fiscal year) provides for adjustments for the impact of acquisitions or dispositions of businesses with annualized sales of $1 billion or more. Dividend equivalents accrue on the performance share awards (as reinvested shares) and will be paid upon the payout of the award based on the actual number of shares earned.

In Fiscal 2014 and the fiscal year ended February 2, 2014 (“Fiscal 2013”), the LDC Committee also granted performance share awards that were structured similarly to the Fiscal 2015-2017 award. The Fiscal 2014-2016 and Fiscal 2013-2015 awards each provide for the grant of shares of our common stock at the end of the respective three-year period based on the achievement of average ROIC and operating profit goals over that period, as follows (dollars in billions):

 

Fiscal 2014-2016 Performance Shares		Threshold		Target		Maximum
Three-Year Average ROIC		21.5%		26.9%		32.2%
Three-Year Average Operating Profit		$8.82		$11.03		$13.24
Percent of Target Payout		25%		100%		200%
Fiscal 2013-2015 Performance Shares		Threshold		Target		Maximum
Three-Year Average ROIC		13.8%		17.3%		20.8%
Three-Year Average Operating Profit		$7.32		$9.15		$10.98
Percent of Target Payout		25%		100%		200%

Operating profit and ROIC under these prior awards are defined in the same manner as under the Fiscal 2015-2017 award, except that the pre-established definition of ROIC under the 2013-2015 award also provides for adjustments for share repurchase activity and dividend increases above a specified level. Dividend equivalents accrue on the performance share awards (as reinvested shares) and will be paid upon the payout of the award based on the actual number of shares earned.

The performance period for the Fiscal 2013-2015 performance share awards ended on January 31, 2016. Over the three-year period, the Company achieved an average ROIC of 17.3% and average operating profit of $10.56 billion, as calculated pursuant to the terms of the awards. As a result, the named executive officers earned approximately 138.2% of their 2013-2015 performance share award, reflecting performance at or in excess of the target level for each metric. Pursuant to the pre-established definition of operating profit for the Fiscal 2013-2015 awards, operating profit was adjusted up by $184.3 million due

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		37

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

to changes in currency exchange rates in Fiscal 2015, adjusted down by $29.7 million due to the acquisition of Interline in Fiscal 2015, and adjusted up by $128.0 million due to charges incurred in Fiscal 2015 in connection with the 2014 data breach. Pursuant to the pre-established definition of ROIC for the Fiscal 2013-2015 awards, ROIC was also adjusted by the same amounts for the impact of currency exchange rates, the Interline acquisition and the data breach, as well as for share repurchases and dividend increases above the dividend level at the time the award was granted. Average operating profit and ROIC over the three-year period without the adjustments were $10.47 billion and 24.6%, respectively. The named executive officers earned the following shares under the award, which include reinvested accrued dividends:

 

Name		Value at Date of Grant(1) (3/27/2013)				Shares Earned at End of Performance Period  (1/31/2016)		Value at End of  Performance Period(2) (1/31/2016)
Craig A. Menear		$	891,659			18,716		$	2,353,724
Carol B. Tomé		$	1,099,982			23,089		$	2,903,673
Matthew A. Carey		$	683,267			14,342		$	1,803,650
Mark Q. Holifield		$	533,310			11,194		$	1,407,757
Marc D. Powers		$	299,983			6,296		$	791,785

 

(1)

Reflects the grant date fair value.

 

(2)

Reflects the value based upon the closing stock price of $125.76 on January 29, 2016, the last trading day of Fiscal 2015.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock.    In March 2015, we granted performance-based restricted stock awards that were forfeitable if operating profit was less than 90% of the MIP target for Fiscal 2015. Dividends on the restricted stock awards are accrued and not paid out unless the performance goal is met. Once the performance goal is met, cash dividends are then paid currently on the shares of restricted stock. The performance goal was met at the end of Fiscal 2015. As a result, the restricted stock will vest 50% on each of the 30- and 60-month anniversaries of the grant date.

Stock Options.    In March 2015, we granted stock options with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our stock, which is defined as the market closing price on the date of grant. The options vest 25% on each of the second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. Option re-pricing is expressly prohibited by our Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”) without shareholder approval.

Deferred Compensation Plans

In addition to the FutureBuilder 401(k) Plan (a broad-based tax-qualified plan), we have two nonqualified deferred compensation plans for our management and highly compensated associates, including executive officers:

 

•

The Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers (solely funded by the individuals who participate in the plan); and

•

The FutureBuilder Restoration Plan (the “Restoration Plan”), which provides a Company matching contribution equal to 3.5% of the amount of salary and annual cash incentive earned by a management-level associate in excess of the IRS limits for tax-qualified plans, payable in shares of common stock of the Company upon retirement or other employment termination.

The plans are designed to permit participants to accumulate income for retirement and other personal financial goals. The Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and the Restoration Plan are described in the notes to the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table beginning on page 51. Deferred compensation arrangements are common executive programs, and we believe that these arrangements help us in the recruitment and retention of executive talent; however, we do not view nonqualified deferred compensation as a significant element of our compensation programs. None of these plans provides above-market or preferential returns.

 

38		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Perquisites

We provide very limited perquisites to our executive officers and do not view them as a significant element of our compensation program. We do not provide tax reimbursements, or “gross-ups,” on perquisites.

Our named executive officers participate in a death-benefit-only program, under which they are entitled to a $400,000 benefit upon death if they are employed by the Company at that time. In addition, the benefit is continued for life for executive officers with ten years of service with the Company. Currently, Messrs. Menear and Powers and Ms. Tomé have met this service requirement and are entitled to lifetime death benefit coverage. In Fiscal 2009, we discontinued this benefit for any new executive officers.

The Company requests that Mr. Menear travel by Company aircraft, including travel for personal reasons. We also permit non-business use of Company aircraft by other named executive officers on a more limited basis.

Other Benefits

Our named executive officers have the option to participate in various employee benefit programs, including medical, dental, disability and life insurance benefit programs. These benefit programs are generally available to all associates. We also provide all associates, including our named executive officers, with the opportunity to purchase our common stock through payroll deductions at a 15% discount through our Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), a nondiscriminatory, tax-qualified plan. All associates, including our named executive officers, are also eligible to participate in our charitable matching gift program through The Home Depot Foundation.

MANAGEMENT OF COMPENSATION-RELATED RISK

 

We employ a number of mechanisms to mitigate the chance of our compensation programs encouraging excessive risk-taking, including those described below.

 

Annual Risk Assessment				As discussed above under “Mitigating Compensation Risk” on page 33, our LDC Committee undertakes an annual review and risk assessment of our compensation policies and practices.
Compensation Recoupment Policy				Pursuant to the executive compensation clawback policy set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, if the Board determines that any bonus, incentive payment, equity award or other compensation awarded to or received by an executive officer was based on any financial results or operating metrics that were achieved as a result of that officer’s knowing or intentional fraudulent or illegal conduct, we will seek to recover from the officer such compensation (in whole or in part) as the Board deems appropriate under the circumstances and as permitted by law.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		39

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines				Our Executive Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines require our named executive officers to hold shares of common stock with a value equal to the specified multiples of base salary indicated below. This program assists in focusing executives on long-term success and shareholder value. Shares owned outright, restricted stock, and shares acquired pursuant to the ESPP, the FutureBuilder 401(k) Plan and the Restoration Plan are counted towards this requirement. Unearned performance shares and unexercised stock options are not counted toward this requirement. Newly hired and promoted executives have four years to satisfy the requirements.
				As of March 4, 2016, all of our active named executive officers complied with the stock ownership and retention guidelines and held the following multiples of base salary (rounded to the nearest whole multiple):

 

 

Anti-Hedging Policy				In Fiscal 2012, the Company adopted a policy that prohibits all associates, officers and directors from entering into hedging or monetization transactions designed to limit the financial risk of owning Company stock. These include prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, exchange funds and other similar transactions, as well as speculative transactions in derivatives of the Company’s securities, such as puts, calls, options (other than those granted under a Company compensation plan) or other derivatives.
Equity Grant Procedures				Company-wide equity grants, including equity grants to named executive officers, are awarded annually effective as of the date of the March meeting of the LDC Committee, which is generally scheduled at least a year in advance. Throughout the year, equity awards are made to new hires, promoted employees, and, in rare circumstances, as a reward for exceptional performance. In all cases, the effective grant date for these mid-year awards is the date of the next regularly scheduled quarterly LDC Committee meeting. The exercise price of each of our stock option grants is the market closing price on the effective grant date.

 

40		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS

 

We have a limited severance arrangement with Ms. Tomé. When Ms. Tomé’s employment arrangement was adopted in 2001, the severance provisions reflected the terms provided to our other executives at that time and were consistent with the terms provided in the competitive market for executive talent. This severance arrangement is discussed below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason” on page 52. We do not have a severance arrangement with our CEO or any of our other active named executive officers.

Mr. Powers served as our Executive Vice President – U.S. Stores until January 31, 2016. In connection with the termination of his employment after 30 years of service to the Company, the Company entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Powers, which is described in more detail below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Payments to Former Executive” on page 55.

We do not have any change in control agreements with our executives. However, our equity awards granted prior to Fiscal 2013, including those granted to the named executive officers, provide for accelerated vesting on a change in control. This type of vesting can be an effective means to retain associates through completion of a value-creating transaction, especially for more senior executives for whom equity represents a significant portion of total compensation. In the event the value of such accelerated vesting constitutes an “excess parachute payment,” the executive would be subject to a 20% excise tax on such amount, and the amount would not be tax deductible by the Company. In Fiscal 2013, the LDC Committee adopted a new form of equity award agreement, beginning with awards granted in Fiscal 2013, that eliminates this accelerated vesting of equity triggered solely by a change in control of the Company. The awards granted since Fiscal 2013, including the awards granted in Fiscal 2015, only provide for accelerated vesting if the executive is terminated within 12 months following a change in control.

TAX DEDUCTIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS

 

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally denies a corporate tax deduction for annual compensation exceeding $1 million paid to the chief executive officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers of a public company, other than the chief financial officer. The limitation does not apply to compensation based on achievement of pre-established performance goals if certain requirements are met. Our Omnibus Plan, and the performance shares, performance-based restricted stock, and stock options granted under this plan, as well as the annual cash incentive award under the MIP, are intended to permit such awards to qualify as performance-based compensation to maximize the tax deductibility of these awards. There can be no assurance that these awards will be fully deductible under all circumstances, however, as a number of additional requirements must be met for the awards to qualify as performance-based compensation. In addition, the LDC Committee reserves the discretion to award compensation that is not exempt from the deduction limits of Section 162(m).

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		41

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

The following table sets forth the compensation during the last three fiscal years paid to or earned by (1) the CEO; (2) the CFO; and (3) the three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers as of the end of Fiscal 2015 (collectively, the “named executive officers”).

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name, Principal Position and Year		Salary ($)(1)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)(2) (3) (6)		Option Awards ($)(2) (6)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)(4) (5)		Total ($)
Craig A. Menear Chairman, Chief Executive Officer & President
2015		1,300,000		–		4,758,790		2,333,316		3,033,014		–		137,320		11,562,440
2014		991,104		–		2,349,258		4,649,994		2,136,504		–		45,005		10,171,865
2013		767,000		–		1,825,574		891,659		982,547		–		51,493		4,518,273
Carol B. Tomé Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President – Corporate Services
2015		1,051,923		–		2,472,858		1,199,994		1,545,671		–		79,076		6,349,522
2014		1,019,231		–		2,380,206		1,149,996		1,300,982		–		133,626		5,984,041
2013		994,231		–		2,275,766		1,099,988		1,534,988		–		89,670		5,994,643
Matthew A. Carey Executive Vice President & Chief Information Officer
2015		710,385		–		1,473,529		716,658		834,079		–		18,478		3,753,129
2014		690,846		–		1,477,490		716,661		705,703		–		20,741		3,611,441
2013		673,077		–		1,408,221		683,330		831,350		–		16,696		3,612,674
Mark Q. Holifield Executive Vice President – Supply Chain & Product Development
2015		755,384		–		1,376,871		666,659		889,079		–		44,936		3,732,929
2014		737,300		–		1,623,288		916,661		759,652		–		35,057		4,071,958
Marc D. Powers Executive Vice President – U.S. Stores(6)
2015		665,385		–		3,089,317		4,773,859		783,794		–		1,479,585		10,791,940

 

(1)	Amount of salary actually received in any year may differ from the annual base salary amount due to the timing of payroll periods and the timing of changes in base salary, which typically occur in April or following a mid-year promotion.

 

(2)

Amounts set forth in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted in Fiscal 2015, Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2013 computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), and also include the incremental fair value related to the modification of certain of Mr. Powers’ stock and option awards pursuant to his separation agreement, as discussed further in footnote 6 below. The assumptions made in the valuation of the awards are set forth in Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on March 24, 2016 (the “2015 Form 10-K”). The valuation of restricted stock awards is based on the closing stock price on the grant date or the modification date, as applicable.

 

(3)

Amounts reflect the grant date fair value of performance share and performance-based restricted stock awards granted to the named executive officers during Fiscal 2015, Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2013, plus the value of share equivalents under the Restoration Plan in Fiscal 2015, Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2013, as set forth in the table below.

 

 

 

42		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The grant date fair value of the performance shares reflected in the table above is computed based upon the probable outcome of the performance goals as of the grant date, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For all performance-based awards other than the performance shares granted in Fiscal 2015, Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2013, this value is the same as the value calculated assuming the maximum level of performance under the awards. The value of the performance share awards granted in Fiscal 2015, Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2013 as of the grant date, assuming that the maximum level of the performance goals will be achieved, is as follows for each of the named executive officers:

 

 

(4)

Incremental cost of perquisites is based on actual cost to the Company. The incremental cost of personal use of Company aircraft is based on the average direct cost of use per hour, which includes fuel, maintenance, crew travel and lodging expense, landing and parking fees, and engine restoration cost. Any applicable deadhead flights are allocated to the named executive officers. No incremental cost for personal use of the Company aircraft was attributed to a named executive officer where the plane was already traveling to the destination for business reasons. Since our aircraft are used primarily for business travel, we do not include the fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as crew salaries, depreciation, hangar rent and insurance. In addition to the incremental cost of personal aircraft use reported in the All Other Compensation column and in footnote 5 below, we also impute taxable income to the named executive officers for any personal aircraft use in accordance with Internal Revenue Service regulations. We do not provide tax reimbursements, or “gross-ups,” on these amounts to executive officers.

 

(5)

The following identifies the perquisites and other compensation for Fiscal 2015 that are required to be quantified by SEC rules. In addition to personal aircraft use, the Company made matching contributions to charitable organizations on behalf of each of the named executive officers, as shown below.

 

Other perquisites and personal benefits for Fiscal 2015 were long-term disability insurance premiums, gifts from an executive business conference, security services for Mr. Menear at certain non-business events, and incremental amounts accrued during Fiscal 2015 under the death-benefit-only program. We do not provide tax gross-ups on any of these perquisites or personal benefits.

The amount in the All Other Compensation column for Mr. Powers also includes a lump sum payment of $150,000 as a partial set-off for his healthcare costs, $9,800 for outplacement services, and a cash payment of $1,300,094 that he received in lieu of any payment under his performance share awards for

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		43

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

the Fiscal 2014-2016 and Fiscal 2015-2017 performance periods, in each case pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement described in more detail below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Payments to Former Executive” on page 55.

 

(6)

Mr. Powers served as our Executive Vice President – U.S. Stores through the end of Fiscal 2015. In connection with the termination of his employment on February 1, 2016 after 30 years of service to the Company, the Company entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Powers, as described in more detail below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Payments to Former Executive” on page 55. Pursuant to the separation agreement, certain restricted shares were modified so that they were no longer subject to risk of forfeiture as of February 1, 2016, although they remained subject to restrictions on transfer for a period of time, and the vesting on certain stock options was accelerated to February 1, 2016. The incremental fair values of these restricted share and stock option awards resulting from the modifications are included in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns, respectively, as further described in footnote 2 above. Accordingly, the value of Mr. Powers’ equity compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation Table is significantly greater than it would have been absent the accounting charges resulting from the modifications. The table below sets forth the impact of these modifications:

 

MATERIAL TERMS OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS

 

This section describes employment arrangements in effect for the named executive officers during Fiscal 2015. All of these arrangements are “at-will” arrangements set forth in the offer letters provided to the named executive officers at the time of hire or promotion, as applicable. These offer letters have no set duration and consequently no renewal or extension provisions. The offer letters are all filed as exhibits to the 2015 Form 10-K.

The offer letters state each named executive officer’s initial base salary and annual MIP target as a percentage of base salary, payout of which is subject to the achievement of pre-established goals. Both the base salary and MIP target are subject to adjustment upon future review by the LDC Committee, or independent members of the Board in the case of Mr. Menear. The Fiscal 2015 base salary and MIP target as a percentage of base salary for each named executive officer are set forth above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

In addition, the offer letters provide that the named executive officers are eligible to participate in other benefit programs available to salaried associates and/or officers. These benefits include the ESPP, the Deferred Compensation Plan For Officers, the Restoration Plan and the death-benefit-only insurance program. Any provisions in the letters regarding termination of employment are discussed below in the section entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” beginning on page 52.

Mr. Menear’s offer letter states that the Company has requested that he travel, whenever practicable, by Company aircraft, including when traveling for personal reasons. However, to the extent he or his family uses Company aircraft for personal reasons, the Company will not provide a tax gross-up for any imputed compensation.

 

44		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

FISCAL 2015 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

 

The following table sets forth the plan-based awards granted to the named executive officers pursuant to Company plans during Fiscal 2015.

 

FISCAL 2015 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS(1)

Name

Grant Date(3)

Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan  Awards

Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards

All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)

All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)

Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(4) ($)

Approval Date(3)

Threshold ($)

Target ($)

Maximum ($)

Threshold (#)

Target (#)

Maximum (#)

Craig A. Menear

Performance Shares

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

2,511

20,088

40,176

–

–

–

2,333,221

Annual Stock Grant

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

–

20,088

–

–

–

–

2,333,221

Annual Option Grant

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

125,955

116.15

2,333,316

2015 MIP(2)

2/26/2015

2/26/2015

104,000

2,600,000

5,200,000

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Carol B. Tomé

Performance Shares

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

1,291

10,331

20,662

–

–

–

1,199,946

Annual Stock Grant

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

–

10,331

–

–

–

–

1,199,946

Annual Option Grant

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

64,777

116.15

1,199,994

2015 MIP(2)

2/26/2015

2/26/2015

53,000

1,325,000

2,650,000

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Matthew A. Carey

Performance Shares

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

771

6,170

12,340

–

–

–

716,646

Annual Stock Grant

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

–

6,170

–

–

–

–

716,646

Annual Option Grant

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

38,686

116.15

716,658

2015 MIP(2)

2/26/2015

2/26/2015

28,600

715,000

1,430,000

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Mark Q. Holifield

Performance Shares

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

717

5,739

11,478

–

–

–

666,585

Annual Stock Grant

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

–

5,739

–

–

–

–

666,585

Annual Option Grant

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

35,987

116.15

666,659

2015 MIP(2)

2/26/2015

2/26/2015

30,400

760,000

1,520,000

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Marc D. Powers

Performance Shares

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

717

5,739

11,478

–

–

–

666,585

Annual Stock Grant

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

–

5,739

–

–

–

–

666,585

Annual Option Grant

3/24/2015

2/26/2015

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

35,987

116.15

666,659

2015 MIP(2)

2/26/2015

2/26/2015

26,800

670,000

1,340,000

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Modified Awards(5)

1/11/2016

1/11/2016

–

–

–

–

–

–

19,283

98,934

–

5,830,036

 

(1)	All awards were granted under the Omnibus Plan, other than MIP awards.

 

(2)

The Fiscal 2015 MIP was based on achievement of pre-established performance goals as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The amount in the “Threshold” column for the 2015 MIP reflects the minimum possible payout based upon assumed achievement of the threshold performance levels as discussed below under “Terms of Plan-Based Awards Granted to the Named Executive Officers for Fiscal 2015—Fiscal 2015 MIP.”

 

(3)

Annual equity awards under the Omnibus Plan were approved at the February 26, 2015 meeting of the LDC Committee (or by the independent Board members on that date for the CEO) but were effective as of March 24, 2015. See discussion under “Equity Grant Procedures” on page 40 in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.

 

(4)

Except as described in footnote 5 below, amounts represent the grant date fair value of awards granted in Fiscal 2015 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in the valuation of the awards are set forth in Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as filed with the SEC in the 2015 Form 10-K. The valuation of restricted stock awards is based on the closing stock price on the grant date.

 

(5)	Amounts represent the incremental fair value of certain of Mr. Powers’ restricted stock and stock option awards resulting from the modifications of the awards pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement, as discussed in more detail in footnote 6 to the Summary Compensation Table.

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		45

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

TERMS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS GRANTED TO NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS FOR FISCAL 2015

 

The LDC Committee approved the Fiscal 2015 annual grants of performance shares, performance-based restricted stock and stock options under the Omnibus Plan for the named executive officers other than Mr. Menear. Mr. Menear’s awards were approved by the independent members of the Board.

 

Award Type				Award Terms
Performance Shares				For Fiscal 2015, one-third of the annual equity grant provided to the named executive officers was in the form of performance shares. The terms and conditions of the awards are described under “Long-Term Incentives” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. In the event of death, disability or retirement at or after age 60 with at least five years of continuous service (“retirement”), the executive or his or her estate will be entitled to receive any performance shares ultimately earned, and in the event of death or disability before retirement, a pro rata portion of any shares ultimately earned. Upon termination of employment within 12 months following a change in control, the executive would be entitled to a pro rata portion of performance shares based on actual performance for the portion of the performance period before a change in control, plus a pro rata portion of the target performance shares for the portion of the performance period after a change in control. Dividend equivalents accrue on performance share awards (as reinvested shares) and are paid upon the payout of the award based on the actual number of shares earned.
Annual Stock Grants				For Fiscal 2015, one-third of the annual equity grant provided to the named executive officers was in the form of performance-based restricted stock, which was forfeitable if Fiscal 2015 operating profit was less than 90% of the MIP target for Fiscal 2015. If the performance target is met, as it was for Fiscal 2015, the awards are then subject to time-based vesting. The annual restricted stock grants vest 50% on each of the 30-month and 60-month anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued employment through the vesting date, or, if sooner, upon termination due to death or disability or termination within 12 months following a change in control. In addition, if the performance target is met, the restricted stock becomes non-forfeitable once the executive reaches retirement eligibility but is not transferable before the time-based vesting dates. Dividends on the restricted stock are accrued (as cash dividends) and not paid out to executive officers unless the performance target is met. Once the performance target is met, cash dividends are then paid currently on the shares of restricted stock.
Annual Stock Option Grants				For Fiscal 2015, one-third of the annual equity grant provided to the named executive officers was in the form of nonqualified stock options. The stock option awards vest 25% per year on the second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued employment through the vesting date, or, if sooner, upon termination due to death or disability or termination within 12 months following a change in control. In addition, the stock option awards become non-forfeitable once the executive becomes retirement eligible but are not exercisable before the time-based vesting dates. Generally, stock options may be exercised, once vested, over the remainder of the ten-year option term.

 

46		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Award Type				Award Terms
Fiscal 2015 MIP				Each of the named executive officers participated in the Fiscal 2015 MIP, the Company’s annual cash-based incentive plan. The Fiscal 2015 MIP payout was based upon achievement of pre-established financial performance goals, as described above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.   The LDC Committee approved threshold, target and maximum payout levels for Fiscal 2015 for the named executive officers under the MIP. The threshold, target and maximum potential payouts under the MIP for the named executive officers reflect the following percentages of base salary at the end of Fiscal 2015:

 

		Name		Percentage of Base Salary
				Threshold		Target		Maximum
		Craig A. Menear		8%		200%		400%
		Carol B. Tomé		5%		125%		250%
		Matthew A. Carey		4%		100%		200%
		Mark Q. Holifield		4%		100%		200%
		Marc D. Powers		4%		100%		200%

 

				Because the operating profit threshold must be met for any payout to occur, the threshold percentage above reflects the minimum possible payout based upon assumed achievement of that threshold. The actual amounts earned based on achievement of Fiscal 2015 MIP performance goals are reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

 

 

The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement		47

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2015 FISCAL YEAR-END

 

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards as of the end of Fiscal 2015 granted to the named executive officers.

 

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2015 FISCAL YEAR-END
		Option Awards																						Stock Awards
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable(1)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)				Option Exercise Price				Option Expiration Date						Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2)				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(3)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Craig A. Menear			34,446				–				–				38.74				3/20/2017						2,500				314,400				18,716				2,353,724
			11,781				–				–				38.95				5/23/2017						5,000				628,800				30,215				3,799,857
			140,372				–				–				26.84				3/18/2018						11,520				1,448,755				20,386				2,563,765
			90,661				–				–				18.52				11/19/2018						9,415				1,184,030				–				–
			113,687				–				–				23.28				3/24/2019						6,401				804,990				–				–
			117,327				–				–				32.32				3/23/2020						14,580				1,833,581				–				–
			85,101				28,367				–				36.62				3/22/2021						20,088				2,526,267				–				–
			47,637				47,637				–				49.79				3/20/2022						–				–				–				–
			17,117				51,351				–				69.65				3/26/2023						–				–				–				–
			–				83,630				–				78.87				3/25/2024						–				–				–				–
			–				215,305				–				97.57				11/19/2024						–				–				–				–
			–				125,955				–				116.15				3/23/2025						–				–				–				–
Carol B. Tomé			67,610				–				–				32.32				3/23/2020						6,000				754,560				23,089				2,903,673
			117,250				39,084				–				36.62				3/22/2021						6,000				754,560				30,215				3,799,857
			59,070				59,070				–				49.79				3/20/2022						6,000				754,560				10,484				1,318,511
			21,116				63,349				–				69.65				3/26/2023						30,000				3,772,800				–				–
			–				83,630				–				78.87				3/25/2024						25,000				3,144,000				–				–
			–				64,777				–				116.15				3/23/2025						25,000				3,144,000				–				–
			–				–				–				–				–						25,000				3,144,000				–				–
			–				–				–				–				–						20,000				2,515,200				–				–
			–				–				–				–				–						15,872				1,996,063				–				–
			–				–				–				–				–						11,674				1,468,122				–				–
			–				–				–				–				–						7,897				993,127				–				–
			–				–				–				–				–						14,580				1,833,581				–				–
			–				–				–				–				–						10,331				1,299,227				–				–
Matthew A. Carey			66,930				–				–				32.32				3/23/2020						8,960				1,126,810				14,342				1,803,650
			66,189				22,064				–				36.62				3/22/2021						7,155				899,813				18,830				2,368,004
			36,204				36,204				–				49.79				3/20/2022						4,905				616,853				6,262				787,457
			13,117				39,354				–				69.65				3/26/2023						9,086				1,142,655				–				–
			–				52,117				–				78.87				3/25/2024						6,170				775,939				–				–
			–				38,686				–				116.15				3/23/2025						–				–				–				–
Mark Q. Holifield			18,856				–				–				32.32				3/23/2020						7,680				965,837				11,194				1,407,757
			18,911				18,912				–				36.62				3/22/2021						5,649				710,418				17,516				2,202,770
			14,291				28,582				–				49.79				3/20/2022						3,829				481,535				5,824				732,450
			10,238				30,715				–				69.65				3/26/2023						3,049				383,442				–				–
			–				17,587				–				81.97				2/26/2024						8,452				1,062,924				–				–
			–				48,481				–				78.87				3/25/2024						5,739				721,737				–				–
			–				35,987				–				116.15				3/23/2025						–				–				–				–
Marc D. Powers(4)			9,778				–				–				32.32				3/23/2020						2,500				314,400				6,296				791,785
			11,347				11,347				–				36.62				3/22/2021						4,608				579,502				8,101				1,018,768
			8,575				17,149				–				49.79				3/20/2022						3,389				426,201				5,824				732,450
			5,759				17,277				–				69.65				3/26/2023						2,154				270,887				–				–
			–				22,422				–				78.87				3/25/2024						3,909				491,596				–				–
			–				15,378				–				97.57				11/19/2024						2,562				322,197				–				–
			–				35,987				–				116.15				3/23/2025						5,739				721,737				–				–

 

48		The Home Depot 2016 Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

 

(1)	Unexercisable stock options outstanding as of the end of Fiscal 2015 for each named executive officer vest as follows:

 

Vesting Date		C. Menear				C. Tomé				M. Carey				M. Holifield				M. Powers
February 27, 2016			–				–				–				4,396				–
March 21, 2016			23,818				29,535				18,102				14,291				8,574
March 23, 2016			28,367				39,084				22,064				18,912				11,347
March 26, 2016			20,907				20,907				13,029				12,120				5,605
March 27, 2016			17,117				21,116				13,118				10,238				5,759
November 20, 2016			53,826				–				–				–				3,844
February 27, 2017			–				–				–				4,397				–
March 21, 2017			23,819				29,535				18,102				14,291				8,575
March 24, 2017			31,488				16,194				9,671				8,996				8,996
March 26, 2017			20,908				20,908				13,029				12,120				5,606
March 27, 2017			17,117				21,116				13,118				10,238				5,759
November 20, 2017			53,826				–				–				–				3,845
February 27, 2018			–				–				–				4,397				–
March 24, 2018			31,489				16,194				9,672				8,997				8,997
March 26, 2018			20,907				20,907				13,029				12,120				5,605
March 27, 2018			17,117				21,117				13,118				10,239				5,759
November 20, 2018			53,826				–				–				–				3,844
February 27, 2019			–				–				–				4,397				–
March 24, 2019			31,489				16,194				9,671				8,997				8,997
March 26, 2019			20,908				20,908				13,030				12,121				5,606
November 20, 2019			53,827				–				–				–				3,845
March 24, 2020			31,489				16,195				9,672				8,997				8,997
Total			552,245				309,910				188,425				180,264				119,560

 

(2)	Restricted stock outstanding as of the end of Fiscal 2015 for each named executive officer vests as follows:

 

Vesting Date

C. Menear

C. Tomé

M. Carey

M. Holifield

M. Powers

March 20, 2016

–

20,000

–

–

–

March 23, 2016

11,520

15,872

8,960

7,680

4,608

August 27, 2016

–

–

–

1,524

–

September 26, 2016

7,290

7,290

&nbs