BIGLARI HOLDINGS INC.
17802 IH 10 WEST, SUITE 400
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78257
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
April 19, 2012
To the Shareholders of Biglari Holdings Inc.:
You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting (the “Annual Meeting”) of the shareholders of Biglari Holdings Inc. (the “Corporation”), to be held at The St. Regis Hotel, Two East 55th Street at Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10022, on April 19, 2012, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, for the following purposes:
|
|
2.
|
To ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2012 fiscal year.
|
|
|
3.
|
To vote on a non-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of the Corporation’s Named Executive Officers, as described in the enclosed proxy statement.
|
|
|
4.
|
To vote on a non-binding advisory resolution to determine the frequency (whether annual, biennial or triennial) with which shareholders of the Corporation shall be entitled to have an advisory vote on executive compensation.
|
|
|
5.
|
To consider and act upon one Humane Society of the United States shareholder proposal.
|
|
|
6.
|
To transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
The Board has fixed the close of business on March 15, 2012 as the record date for determining which shareholders have the right to vote at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournment thereof.
You are requested to date, sign and return the enclosed proxy, which is solicited by the Board. A return envelope is provided that requires no postage if mailed in the United States. If mailed elsewhere, foreign postage must be affixed.
|
By order of the Board,
|
| |
| /s/ Duane E. Geiger |
|
|
|
Duane E. Geiger
|
|
Secretary
|
San Antonio, Texas
March 15, 2012
If you plan to attend the meeting:
If you are a shareholder of record and you plan to attend the meeting, please keep the admission ticket that is attached to the enclosed proxy card because you must present this ticket to be admitted to the meeting. Each shareholder will be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Shareholders who do not present an admission ticket must present proof of ownership of shares. Those shareholders holding shares in brokerage accounts will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement, a legal proxy or a letter from the broker confirming ownership of Biglari Holdings Inc.’s shares. Registration will begin at 12:00 p.m. Cameras, recording devices, and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting.
BIGLARI HOLDINGS INC.
17802 IH 10 WEST, SUITE 400
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78257
PROXY STATEMENT FOR
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON APRIL 19, 2012
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Biglari Holdings Inc. (hereinafter “we”, “our”, “BH”, “Corporation” or “Company”) of proxies in the accompanying form for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at The St. Regis Hotel, Two East 55th Street at Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10022, on April 19, 2012, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). This proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy are first being sent to shareholders on or about March 16, 2012.
Solicitation of proxies may be made by mail and through telephonic or telegraphic communications to, or by meetings with, shareholders or their representatives by directors, officers and other employees of the Corporation who will receive no additional compensation for this service. In addition, the Corporation has engaged Morrow & Co., LLC (“Morrow”) to act as our proxy solicitation agent. Morrow will be paid a fee of $7,000 and will be reimbursed for disbursements made on our behalf. You may obtain information from Morrow as follows: 470 West Avenue—3rd Floor, Stamford, CT 06902; banks and brokerage firms, please call (203) 658-9400; shareholders please call (800) 607-0088. The cost of preparing, printing and mailing this proxy statement and the accompanying form of proxy, and the cost of soliciting proxies related to the Annual Meeting, will be borne by the Corporation. The Corporation will reimburse brokerage firms, banks, trustees and others for their actual out-of-pocket expenses in forwarding proxy material to the beneficial owners of the common stock, stated value $0.50 per share (the “Common Stock”), of the Corporation.
The Board has fixed the close of business on March 15, 2012 as the record date for determining which shareholders have the right to vote at the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”). As of the Record Date, the Corporation had outstanding and entitled to vote 1,433,301 shares of Common Stock. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders of the Corporation. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of Common Stock holding in the aggregate a majority of the voting power of the Corporation’s stock entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
A plurality of the votes properly cast for the election of directors by the shareholders attending the meeting, in person or by proxy, will elect directors to office. However, pursuant to the Corporation’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, if a director nominee in an uncontested election receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” that director’s election, the nominee shall promptly offer his or her resignation to the Board. A committee consisting of the Board’s independent directors (which will specifically exclude any director who is required to offer his or her own resignation) shall consider all relevant factors and decide on behalf of the Board the action to be taken with respect to such offered resignation and will determine whether to accept the resignation or take other action. The Corporation will publicly disclose the Board’s decision with regard to any resignation offered under these circumstances with an explanation of how the decision was reached, including, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the offered resignation.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve each of Proposal 2, ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2012 fiscal year, and Proposal 3, an advisory vote on executive compensation. Since Proposal 4 is an advisory vote to recommend the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, the frequency option receiving the greatest number of votes on Proposal 4 will be the advisory vote of the shareholders. Approval of the shareholder proposal requires that it be properly presented at the Annual Meeting and that it receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Shareholders may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” a vote for the election of directors, “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to each other proposal (other than Proposal 4) submitted to shareholders at the Annual Meeting, and “EVERY 3 YEARS,” “EVERY 2 YEARS,” “EVERY 1 YEAR” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to Proposal 4, the advisory vote to recommend the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. In addition, a broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares of Common Stock for the beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Brokers that do not receive instructions from the beneficial owners of shares of Common Stock are not entitled to vote on any proposal at the Annual Meeting other than Proposal 2, to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2012 fiscal year. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum at the Annual Meeting, but will not count as votes cast. Therefore, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on either the election of directors or the outcome of Proposal 4. Abstentions have the same effect as a vote against Proposals 2 and 3 and the shareholder proposal. Broker non-votes, however, will not be considered present and entitled to vote on Proposals 2 and 3 and the shareholder proposal and generally will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on such proposals.
Shareholders who submit a proxy may revoke their proxy or change their vote at any time prior to the Annual Meeting by: (1) sending a written revocation to the Secretary of the Corporation; (2) submitting a new proxy bearing a later date in accordance with the instructions on your proxy card or provided by your broker or bank; or (3) attending the Annual Meeting and voting your shares in person. Shareholders who send in proxies but attend the Annual Meeting in person may vote directly if they prefer and withdraw their proxies or may allow their proxies to be voted with the similar proxies sent in by other shareholders.
Under Indiana law, our shareholders are not entitled to appraisal rights or other similar rights in connection with any of the proposals to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 19, 2012.
The Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 19, 2012 and the Corporation’s 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.biglariholdings.com/annualmeeting.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the Annual Meeting, a Board consisting of five members will be elected, each director to hold office until a successor is elected and qualified, or until the director resigns, is removed or becomes disqualified.
Upon the recommendation of the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee, the members of the Board have nominated for election the five current directors of the Corporation.
Certain information with respect to nominees for election as directors, including the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led to the selection of each nominee by the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee, is contained in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sardar Biglari
|
|
34
|
|
2008
|
|
Chairman, since June 2008, and Chief Executive Officer, since August 2008, of Biglari Holdings. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Biglari Capital Corp. (“Biglari Capital”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Biglari Holdings and general partner of The Lion Fund, L.P. (the “Lion Fund”), a private investment fund, since its inception in 2000. He has also served as Chairman, since March 2006, Chief Executive Officer and President, since May 2007, and a director, since December 2005, of Western Sizzlin Corporation (“Western”), a diversified holding company, which was acquired by Biglari Holdings in March 2010. Director of CCA Industries, Inc. (“CCA Industries”), a manufacturer and marketer of health and beauty aids, since August 2011. Mr. Biglari has extensive managerial and investing experience in a broad range of businesses through his services as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and its major operating subsidiaries. He also has experience serving on the boards of directors of public companies.
|
|
Philip L. Cooley
|
|
68
|
|
2008
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Board since April 2009. Prassel Distinguished Professor of Business at Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas, since 1985. Served as an advisory director of Biglari Capital since 2000 and as Vice Chairman and a director of Western from March 2006 and December 2005, respectively, until its acquisition by Biglari Holdings in March 2010. Director of CCA Industries since August 2011. Dr. Cooley has extensive business and investment knowledge and experience. He also has experience serving on the boards of directors of public companies.
|
|
Kenneth R. Cooper
|
|
67
|
|
2010
|
|
Attorney in the private practice of law in San Antonio, Texas since 1974, specializing in real estate transactions. Served as a director of Western from February 2007 until its acquisition by Biglari Holdings in March 2010. Mr. Cooper has extensive real estate experience and knowledge of Western’s business.
|
|
William L. Johnson
|
|
69
|
|
2012
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of The Berean Group, LLC, a business consulting firm, since June 2002. Served as President and Chief Executive Officer of SEMCO ENERGY, Inc., a natural gas and energy distributor that was listed on the New York Stock Exchange, from May 1996 until June 2001 and as Chairman of the Board from May 1996 until February 2002. Vice Chairman of the Board of Fremont Michigan InsuraCorp, Inc., a property and casualty insurance provider, from 2003 until 2011. Mr. Johnson has leadership, business management and public company experience.
|
|
Ruth J. Person
|
|
66
|
|
2002
|
|
Chancellor and Professor of Management, University of Michigan-Flint. Former Chancellor, Indiana University Kokomo and Professor of Management from 1999 through 2008. Member, Board of Managers, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan. President of the American Association of University Administrators from 2003 through 2004. Formerly served as President and member of the board of directors of Workforce Development Strategies, Inc. and as a member of the Key Bank Advisory Board – Central Indiana. Dr. Person has years of experience in leadership and board positions, and as a professor of management, at various institutions.
|
The Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board has concluded that the following directors are independent in accordance with the director independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange, and has determined that none of them has a material relationship with the Corporation which would impair his or her independence from management or otherwise compromise his or her ability to act as an independent director: Philip L. Cooley, Kenneth R. Cooper, William L. Johnson and Ruth J. Person.
When the accompanying proxy is properly executed and returned, the shares it represents will be voted in accordance with the directions indicated thereon or, if no direction is indicated, the shares will be voted in favor of the election of the five nominees identified above. The Corporation expects each nominee to be able to serve if elected, but if any nominee notifies the Corporation before the Annual Meeting that he or she is unable to do so, then the proxies will be voted for the remainder of those nominated and, as designated by the directors, may be voted (i) for a substitute nominee or nominees, or (ii) to elect such lesser number to constitute the whole Board as equals the number of nominees who are able to serve.
Board Meetings, Committees, Directors’ Compensation and Nominations
The Board’s actions were taken at seven meetings held during fiscal year 2011. Each director during fiscal year 2011 attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board and of the committees of the Board on which he or she served. Directors are encouraged but not required to attend annual meetings of the Corporation’s shareholders. All current directors of the Corporation who were then serving as directors attended the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The Board has established an Audit Committee in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Audit Committee consists of Philip L. Cooley, Ruth J. Person, Kenneth R. Cooper and William L. Johnson. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Philip L. Cooley, Ruth J. Person and William L. Johnson meets the definition of “audit committee financial expert” as that term is used in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act. All current members of the Audit Committee meet the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and in Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual. The Audit Committee assists the Board with oversight of a) the integrity of the Corporation’s financial statements, b) the Corporation’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and c) the qualifications and independence of the Corporation’s independent public accountants and the Corporation’s internal audit function. The Audit Committee meets periodically with the Corporation’s independent public accountants, internal auditors and members of management and reviews the Corporation’s accounting policies and internal controls. The Audit Committee also selects the firm of independent public accountants to be retained by the Corporation to perform the audit. The Audit Committee held six formal meetings during fiscal year 2011. The Audit Committee Charter is available on the Corporation’s website at www.biglariholdings.com and may also be obtained at no charge by written request to the attention of the Secretary of the Corporation at 17802 IH 10 West, Suite 400, San Antonio, Texas 78257.
The Board has established a Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee and adopted a charter to define and outline the responsibilities of its members. A copy of the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee Charter is available on the Corporation’s website at www.biglariholdings.com and may also be obtained at no charge by written request to the attention of the Secretary of the Corporation at 17802 IH 10 West, Suite 400, San Antonio, Texas 78257. The Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee consists of Philip L. Cooley, Ruth J. Person, Kenneth R. Cooper and William L. Johnson, all of whom are independent directors in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange director independence standards.
The role of the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee is to assist the Board by a) recommending governance guidelines applicable to the Corporation; b) identifying, evaluating and recommending the nomination of Board members; c) setting the compensation of the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and performing other compensation oversight; d) reviewing related persons transactions; and e) assisting the Board with other related tasks, as assigned from time to time. The Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee held five formal meetings during fiscal year 2011.
The Corporation does not have a policy regarding the consideration of diversity, however defined, in identifying nominees for director. Instead, in identifying director nominees, the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee looks for individuals who possess integrity, ownership mentality, business expertise and enterprise qualities that support an entrepreneurial culture. With respect to the selection of director nominees at the Annual Meeting, the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee recommends the Board nominate the five directors currently serving on the Board.
The Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee has a policy under which it will consider recommendations presented by shareholders. A shareholder wishing to submit such a recommendation should send a letter to the Secretary of the Corporation at 17802 IH 10 West, Suite 400, San Antonio, Texas 78257. The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation that the enclosed letter is a “Director Nominee Recommendation”. The Secretary must receive the recommendation not less than 120 days prior to the date we released our proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting for it to be considered by the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The letter must identify the author as a shareholder and provide a brief summary of the candidate’s qualifications. At a minimum, candidates recommended for nomination to the Board must meet the director independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee’s policy provides that candidates recommended by shareholders will be evaluated using the same criteria as are applied to all other candidates.
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
Sardar Biglari is the Corporation’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. He also has voting and dispositive power over approximately 15.4% of the Corporation’s outstanding shares of Common Stock. The Corporation is a holding company engaged in a number of diverse business activities. All major operating, investment, and capital allocation decisions are made by Sardar Biglari, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, on behalf of the Company and its main operating subsidiaries. Because of the Company’s holding company structure, along with the centralization of managerial and capital allocation decisions to Mr. Biglari, the most effective leadership model for the Corporation is to designate Mr. Biglari to hold both positions of Chairman and Chief Executive. Furthermore, the Company has no investor relations department as Mr. Biglari is the focal point for communications between the Company and its shareholders.
The Board has not named a lead independent director. The Board believes the independent nature of the Audit Committee and the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee ensures that the Board maintains a level of autonomous oversight of management.
The full Board has responsibility for general oversight of relevant risks. Mr. Biglari bears responsibility for managing various risks faced by the Company. Furthermore, Mr. Biglari reviews with the Board relevant possible risks. In addition, as part of its Charter, the Audit Committee discusses the Corporation’s policies concerning risk assessment and risk management.
Director Compensation
Directors of the Corporation who are employees do not receive fees for attendance at directors’ meetings. During fiscal year 2011, a director who was not an employee received an annual cash retainer of $32,000, and the Chair of the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee received an annual cash retainer of $37,000. For his role as Vice Chairman of the Board and such other duties as designated by the Board, Dr. Cooley received an annual cash retainer of $120,000. In addition, non-employee directors receive cash fees for meeting attendance as follows:
|
|
·
|
$3,500 for each in-person Board meeting attended;
|
|
|
·
|
$1,250 for each committee meeting attended in-person not held in conjunction with a Board meeting;
|
|
|
·
|
$500 for each committee meeting attended held in conjunction with a Board meeting; and
|
|
|
·
|
$500 for any meeting (Board or committee) in which the director participated by phone.
|
From November 2008 to March 2009, we paid all retainers in Company stock. We have discontinued that practice to avoid equity dilution. Effective April 1, 2009, all annual retainers have been paid in cash only.
The following table provides compensation information for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2011 for each non-management member of the Board who served on the Board during such fiscal year:
|
|
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip L. Cooley
|
|
$ |
113,408 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
a |
|
$ |
143,408 |
|
|
Ruth J. Person
|
|
$ |
45,280 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
45,280 |
|
|
Kenneth R. Cooper
|
|
$ |
43,261 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
43,261 |
|
|
John W. Ryanb
|
|
$ |
35,337 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
35,337 |
|
|
William J. Regan, Jr.c
|
|
$ |
34,756 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
34,756 |
|
|
a.
|
Represents the value of director’s fees received by Dr. Cooley from serving on the Board of Directors of CCA Industries, in which the Company has a significant ownership interest.
|
|
b.
|
Dr. Ryan passed away on August 6, 2011.
|
|
c.
|
Mr. Regan served as a director until the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, at which he did not stand for re-election, held on April 7, 2011.
|
During fiscal year 2010, we resolved to suspend, indefinitely, all future option grants and placed a moratorium on the issuance of restricted stock. Accordingly, we did not grant any stock options, shares of restricted stock or other equity compensation to our directors in the fiscal year ended September 28, 2011.
Meetings of Independent Directors
One meeting of the independent directors, chaired by Philip L. Cooley, was held during fiscal year 2011. A shareholder or other interested party wishing to contact the independent directors, as applicable, should send a letter to the Secretary of the Corporation at 17802 IH 10 West, Suite 400, San Antonio, Texas 78257. The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation that the enclosed letter is to be forwarded to the Corporation’s independent directors.
Shareholder Communications with the Board
Shareholders who wish to communicate with the Board or a particular director may send a letter to the Secretary of the Corporation at 17802 IH 10 West, Suite 400, San Antonio, Texas 78257. The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation that the enclosed letter is a “Shareholder-Board Communication” or “Shareholder-Director Communication.” All such letters must identify the author as a shareholder and clearly state whether the intended recipients are all members of the Board or just certain specified individual directors. The Secretary will make copies of all such letters and circulate them to the appropriate director or directors.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to promote effective governance of the Corporation. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the Corporation’s website at www.biglariholdings.com. A copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines also may be obtained at no charge by written request to the attention of the Secretary of the Corporation at 17802 IH 10 West, Suite 400, San Antonio, Texas 78257.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The Corporation has adopted a Code of Conduct for all directors, officers and employees as well as directors, officers and employees of each of its subsidiaries. The Code of Conduct is available on the Corporation’s website at www.biglariholdings.com. A copy of the Code of Conduct may also be obtained at no charge by written request to the attention of the Secretary of the Corporation at 17802 IH 10 West, Suite 400, San Antonio, Texas 78257.
Related Person Transactions
Policy Regarding Related Person Transactions
The Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee reviews each related person transaction (as defined below) and determines whether it will approve or ratify that transaction based on whether the transaction is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Any Board member who has any interest (actual or perceived) will not be involved in the consideration.
A “related person transaction” is any transaction, arrangement or relationship in which we are a participant, the related person (defined below) had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest and the aggregate amount involved is expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year. “Related person” includes (a) any person who is or was (at any time during the last fiscal year) an officer, director or nominee for election as a director; (b) any person or group who is a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our voting securities; (c) any immediate family member of a person described in provisions (a) or (b) of this sentence; or (d) any entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed, is a partner or has a greater than 5% beneficial ownership interest.
In determining whether a related person transaction will be approved or ratified, the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee may consider factors such as (a) the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction; (b) the availability of other sources of comparable products or services; (c) whether the terms are competitive with terms generally available in similar transactions with persons that are not related persons; (d) the benefit to us; and (e) the aggregate value of the transaction.
Related Person Transactions
On March 30, 2010, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Grill Acquisition Corporation (“Merger Sub”), acquired 100% of the outstanding equity interests of Western pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger among the Company, Merger Sub and Western, dated as of October 22, 2009 (the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into Western, with Western continuing as the surviving corporation and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, each share of Western’s common stock was cancelled upon the completion of the merger and converted into the right to receive a pro rata portion of a new issue of 14% redeemable subordinated debentures due 2015 issued by the Company in the aggregate principal amount of $22,959,000 (approximately $8.07 principal amount of debentures per Western share). On March 30, 2011, the Company redeemed all of the outstanding debentures for cash at an aggregate redemption price of approximately $23,420,000, representing 100% of the principal amount outstanding, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but not including, March 30, 2011, including approximately $7,804,000 of principal and interest paid to the Lion Fund. Sardar Biglari, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, was also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Western at the time of the acquisition, and Dr. Cooley, Vice Chairman of the Board, was also Vice Chairman of the Board of Western at that time. Additionally, at the time of the merger, Mr. Biglari, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Biglari Capital, general partner of the Lion Fund, beneficially owned approximately 32.8% of the shares of Western’s common stock, which were owned directly by the Lion Fund.
Mr. Biglari (together with his affiliates), Dr. Cooley (who is also a member of the advisory board of the Lion Fund) and Mr. Cooper have made investments in the Lion Fund (other than the amounts invested by the Company), which are not subject to special profits, interest allocations, or incentive allocations. However, Mr. Biglari does not pay an incentive fee as a limited partner in the Lion Fund. As of September 30, 2011, Mr. Biglari and Mr. Cooper had invested capital of $1,810,214 and $133,465, respectively, in the Lion Fund.
Except as set forth above, there are no transactions that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Executive Officers
Our executive officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors, or at such interim times as circumstances may require.
Other than Mr. Biglari, the only executive officer of the Corporation is Duane E. Geiger. Mr. Geiger, age 49, has served as the Corporation’s Interim Chief Financial Officer since July 2008, as Vice President since 2004 and as Controller from 2004 until January 2012.
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2012. Deloitte & Touche LLP has served in that capacity since fiscal 2004. A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so, and will be available to respond to questions.
If the shareholders do not ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider its choice, taking into consideration the views of the shareholders, and may (but will not be required to) appoint a different firm to serve in that capacity for fiscal 2012.
Required Vote
If a quorum is present, approval of the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2012 will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Our Board unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR the ratification of the selection by the Audit Committee of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2012. Properly dated and signed proxies will be so voted unless shareholders specify otherwise.
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Background
The Corporation is providing shareholders an advisory vote on executive compensation as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act. Section 14A was added to the Exchange Act by Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”).
The advisory vote on executive compensation is a non-binding vote on the compensation of the Corporation’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure. The advisory vote on executive compensation is not a vote on the Corporation’s general compensation policies, compensation of the Board, or the Corporation’s compensation policies as they relate to risk management.
The Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee believes the Corporation’s executive compensation program, including the Incentive Agreement with Mr. Biglari (which was previously approved by 82% of the votes cast by shareholders at a special meeting), reflects a strong pay-for-performance philosophy and is closely aligned with shareholders’ long-term interests. At our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, shareholders approved the non-binding advisory resolution on the compensation of the Corporation’s Named Executive Officers submitted at that meeting. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis section starting on page 19 of this proxy statement provides a more detailed discussion of the Corporation’s executive compensation policies and practices.
Non-Binding Advisory Resolution
We are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for the Company’s executive compensation program as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our Named Executive Officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. Accordingly, we will ask our shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and any related material disclosed in this proxy statement is hereby APPROVED.”
This advisory vote on executive compensation is not binding on the Board. However, the Board values the opinion of our shareholders and will take into account the result of the vote when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.
Required Vote
If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve this resolution.
Our Board recommends a vote FOR adoption of the advisory resolution approving the compensation of the Corporation’s Named Executive Officers. Properly dated and signed proxies will be so voted unless shareholders specify otherwise.
FREQUENCY OF FUTURE SAY ON PAY ADVISORY VOTES
Background
The Corporation is also providing shareholders an advisory vote on the frequency with which the Corporation’s shareholders shall have the advisory vote on executive compensation provided for in Proposal 3 above. For convenience, in this Proposal 4 the shareholders’ advisory vote on executive compensation provided for in Proposal 3 above is referred to as the “say-on-pay vote”.
The advisory vote on the frequency of the say-on-pay vote is a non-binding vote as to how often the say-on-pay vote should occur: every year, every two years, or every three years. In addition, shareholders may abstain from voting.
At the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a plurality of the votes cast was voted in favor of holding the say-on-pay vote annually. Accordingly, the Board determined that the Company would hold the say-on-pay vote at the Annual Meeting. After further consideration, the Board believes that a triennial frequency (i.e., every three years) is the optimal frequency for the say-on-pay vote. Therefore, the Board recommends that you vote “FOR” a triennial interval for the advisory say-on-pay vote. The Board supports a triennial vote because the Corporation’s executive compensation policies and practices are designed to maximize long-term shareholder value. Accordingly, the Board believes a triennial vote will align more closely with the long-term strategic objectives of our executive compensation program, as well as provide shareholders a more appropriate timeframe to evaluate the effectiveness of our executive compensation program in achieving these objectives.
Non-Binding Advisory Resolution
We are asking our shareholders to vote on the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the option of once every one year, two years, or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast for this resolution will be determined to be the preferred frequency with which Biglari Holdings Inc. (the “Corporation”) is to hold a shareholder vote to approve the compensation of the Corporation’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Corporation’s Proxy Statement for Annual Meetings of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.”
This advisory vote on the frequency of the say-on-pay vote is not binding on the Board. However, the Board values the opinion of our shareholders and will take into account the result of the vote when determining the frequency of future say-on-pay votes.
Required Vote
If a quorum is present, the frequency option of every one year, two years or three years that receives the greatest number of votes on this Proposal 4 will be the advisory vote on the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation.
Our Board recommends a vote for the option of every THREE YEARS for the frequency with which shareholders are provided an advisory vote on the compensation of the Corporation’s Named Executive Officers. Properly dated and signed proxies will be so voted unless shareholders specify otherwise. Shareholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation. Shareholders may choose among the four choices included in the resolutions set forth above.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL
Background
The Humane Society of the United States (“HSUS”), 2100 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037, the beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of our Common Stock, has notified the Corporation that they intend to propose the following resolution and supporting statement. HSUS’ proposed resolution and supporting statement are reproduced verbatim below from HSUS’ letter to us dated September 23, 2011. The Corporation takes no responsibility for the accuracy of HSUS’ statements.
Shareholder Resolution Regarding Food Safety
RESOLVED that shareholders encourage management to create a plan for ensuring that at least five percent of eggs used by Steak ‘n Shake come from hens in cage-free production environments by March 1, 2013.
Supporting Statement:
Food safety is a potential headline risk for quick serve restaurants. The company’s statement that, “Food safety is our utmost concern” contradicts its exclusive use of eggs from hens confined in cages.
|
|
·
|
Over the last five years, sixteen studies published comparing Salmonella contamination in cage and cage-free egg operations found higher rates of Salmonella in the cage facilities. The only two studies ever published comparing risk at the consumer level both tied increased Salmonella risk to cage egg consumption. A study published in the American Journal of Epidemiology found that people who recently ate eggs from caged hens had twice the odds of being sickened by Salmonella, and a study in Epidemiology and Infection found nearly five times lower odds of Salmonella poisoning in consumers who chose eggs from free-range hens. As the title of a 2010 World Poultry report read, “Salmonella Thrives in Cage Housing.”
|
|
|
·
|
A Johns Hopkins School of Public Health-funded study recommended phasing out cages for hens — a move also supported by The Center for Food Safety, and The Consumer Federation of America.
|
|
|
·
|
After the 2010 egg recall (which resulted from Salmonella infection), a CNN story asked, “Are cages to blame for egg recall?” A San Francisco Chronicle headline read, “Egg recall heats up debate over caging chickens,” and a USA Today headline read, “Salmonella Outbreak Spurs Push against Industrial Farms.” For The New York Times, Nicholas Kristof wrote, “Let’s hope this salmonella outbreak is a wake-up call… We can overhaul our agriculture system so that it’s … safer … starting with a move toward cage-free eggs.”
|
|
|
·
|
Steak ‘n Shake competitors including Denny’s, Red Robin, Ruby Tuesday, TGI Friday’s, Cracker Barrel, IHOP, McDonald’s, Burger King, Wendy’s, Subway, and Sonic all use cage-free eggs. Kraft Foods, Sara Lee, Hellmann’s, General Mills, ConAgra, and numerous other food manufacturers also use cage-free eggs. Unilever has a webpage devoted to this issue, which states: “Eggs are a vital ingredient in dozens of our best-known food products… [and] we are committed to ensuring that all the eggs we use in our products are produced by cage-free hens.” And 100% of the private label eggs sold at Walmart and Costco are cage-free.
|
Unlike its competitors, Steak ‘n Shake doesn’t use cage-free eggs. The company can begin rectifying this problem and better meet its own food safety commitments by developing a plan to phase in cage-free eggs. We [HSUS] therefore believe it is in shareholders’ best interest to vote FOR this resolution which would simply encourage the company to move in that direction.
Management’s Response
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal put forth by HSUS.
The Corporation respects HSUS’ position. However, the Corporation, on behalf of its shareholders, is guided by two conditions: (1) what the law mandates, and (2) what customers desire. Working within those parameters, the Board will take action that is in the best interests of its shareholders. The Corporation is concerned with its customers’ wishes, not adhering to its competitors’ actions. The Board will not impose personal views involving shareholders’ money because it is managing the Company on the shareholders’ behalf.
Required Vote
If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve this proposal.
Our Board recommends a vote AGAINST the approval of the HSUS proposal. Properly dated and signed proxies will be so voted unless shareholders specify otherwise.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis is designed to provide shareholders with a better understanding of our compensation philosophy, core principles, and decision making process. It explains the compensation-related actions taken with respect to the executive officers who are identified in the Summary Compensation Table (the “Named Executive Officers”). Details regarding the compensation we paid to the Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2011 are found in the tables and narrative which follows them.
Compensation Philosophy
Introduction
Biglari Holdings is a diversified holding company engaged in a number of diverse business activities. The Company’s long-term objective is to maximize per-share intrinsic value of the Company. The Company’s most important operating subsidiaries are engaged in investment management and the franchising/operating of restaurants. All major operating, investment, and capital allocation decisions are made for the Company by Sardar Biglari, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the holding company and its main operating subsidiaries.
Our executive compensation consists exclusively of a salary and a cash bonus. In fiscal 2009, our restructuring into a diversified holding company effected significant changes to our compensation system. For example, at the end of fiscal 2009 and throughout fiscal 2010 and 2011, our executive officers consisted of only our Chief Executive Officer, Sardar Biglari, and our Interim Chief Financial Officer, Duane Geiger. In fiscal 2010, the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee and our shareholders approved the Amended and Restated Incentive Bonus Agreement with Mr. Biglari (the “Incentive Agreement”), which embodies the pay-for-performance ethos of the Company and its focus on maximizing long-term shareholder value.
To assist shareholders in fully understanding the information in this proxy statement, we have included an overview of our compensation structure.
The Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee
Our program for compensation of executive officers differs from those of most public companies. The Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee of our Board (the “Committee”) was created in fiscal 2010. The Committee determines the amount of compensation pursuant to the Incentive Agreement. The Committee’s functions include oversight of our compensation policies in general, which are described in the Committee’s charter. Under the Committee’s compensation tenets, the Corporation does not grant stock options to executive officers.
The Committee has delegated to Mr. Biglari the responsibility of establishing the compensation of other executive officers, currently the Company’s Interim Chief Financial Officer. Factors Mr. Biglari considers in setting executive officer salary are typically subjective, such as his perception of the merits of the executive’s performance and any changes in that executive’s functional responsibilities. Mr. Biglari will also affix the compensation for the senior executives of the Company’s major subsidiaries. He may utilize different incentive arrangements, with their terms dependent upon such elements as the economic potential or capital intensity of the business. The incentives could be large and will always be tied to the operating results for which an executive exercises authority.
At our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our first “say on pay” proposal was approved by shareholders. The Committee considered shareholders’ support as a continuing endorsement of our executive compensation program.
Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Fiscal Years 2011 and 2010
Compensation of Sardar Biglari
In light of the Corporation’s restructuring as a diversified holding company and the acquisition of Biglari Capital, general partner of the Lion Fund, Mr. Biglari’s duties have increased substantially after he initially joined the Company. In recognition of Mr. Biglari’s expanded and significant role as well as his agreement to fold Biglari Capital into the Company, the Committee decided to redesign his compensation arrangement to coincide more sensibly with his numerous operating and capital-allocation responsibilities. Furthermore, the Company and the Committee espouse a results-oriented, pay-for-performance incentive system that reflects its entrepreneurial culture. To assure a fair, objective, and reasoned compensation system, the Committee retained Towers Watson, nationally recognized compensation consultants, to assist in formulating an appropriate incentive compensation arrangement. The Committee firmly believes it has designed a compensation system that is rational, innovative, and equitably aligned with shareholder interests. In essence, the rationale underlying the remuneration plan emphasizes that pay is based upon performance, is in line with the compensation paid by the Company’s peer group, and resulted in the Biglari Capital acquisition.
In designing Mr. Biglari’s incentive arrangement, the Committee examined carefully market data provided by Towers Watson regarding the total remuneration of chief executives in a peer group of 36 companies, which consisted of restaurants, asset managers, and diversified holding companies. These executives carried out responsibilities similar in scope to Mr. Biglari’s. The peer group was composed of 18 quick-service and casual-dine restaurants and 18 asset management firms and diversified holding companies. The Committee believes both types of companies that compose the peer group are appropriate comparisons given Mr. Biglari’s dual responsibilities and duties, which encompass restaurant operations and capital allocation and investment management.
Because of the Company’s strategic direction and business model, the Committee reviewed the pay practices and fee structures of a broad group of asset managers. The most common type of incentive arrangement was based on a percentage of returns or gains above a predetermined hurdle rate. The Committee noted that this type of arrangement resembled Mr. Biglari’s compensation arrangement as Chairman and Chief Executive of Biglari Capital prior to the Lion Fund transaction.
In addition, the Committee tailored Mr. Biglari’s compensation arrangement to fulfill the following seven objectives:
|
1.
|
Alignment with Shareholders – Mr. Biglari’s interests should be aligned with those of the shareholders. He should have a strong economic incentive to build long-term business value and thereby create shareholder value.
|
|
2.
|
Appropriateness – Mr. Biglari should be compensated for his combined responsibilities as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a diversified holding company. His compensation should acknowledge and be in keeping with the expansion of his responsibilities from the time he joined the Corporation. His total remuneration should be commensurate with or below that of executives at other like companies.
|
|
3.
|
Equitability concerning Lion Fund Transaction – Mr. Biglari’s compensation should, at least partially, be viewed in light of the opportunity cost and remuneration which he gave up through the Lion Fund transaction.
|
|
4.
|
Pay for Performance – The compensation program should correlate pay with performance. Common pay vehicles like discretionary bonuses, stock options, time-vested shares and other similar perquisites and benefits should be eliminated because the Committee believes that these conventional incentives (e.g., stock options, restricted stock, etc.) do not closely relate to shareholder value creation.
|
|
5.
|
Reduction of Conflicts of Interests – Mr. Biglari should focus on the Corporation’s long-term success. The potential for conflicts of interest which could have arisen over Mr. Biglari’s compensation arrangement with Biglari Capital should be nullified.
|
|
6.
|
No Dilution of Shareholder Ownership – Mr. Biglari’s compensation program should not increase the number of shares outstanding, which would dilute a shareholder’s ownership in the Corporation.
|
|
7.
|
Mitigation of Risks – The compensation program should not create undue risks to the Corporation and should be able to limit potential hazards.
|
Economic Terms of Incentive Agreement
The Corporation initially entered into the Incentive Agreement with Mr. Biglari on April 30, 2010, and it was amended and restated on September 28, 2010. The Incentive Agreement was approved by 82% of the votes cast by our shareholders at our special meeting held on November 5, 2010.
The following summary encapsulates the major economic provisions of the Incentive Agreement:
Incentive Formula. The Incentive Agreement establishes a performance-based annual incentive payment to Mr. Biglari contingent on the growth of the Corporation’s adjusted book value in each fiscal year. If the Corporation exceeds a 6% annual adjusted book value growth hurdle, Mr. Biglari would receive incentive compensation equal to 25% of the Corporation’s growth in adjusted book value in excess of that measuring point. For purposes of the Incentive Agreement, the Corporation’s book value is determined by the Corporation’s net income and other comprehensive income, on a consolidated basis, excluding dividends, shares issuances or buybacks, and other factors unrelated to Mr. Biglari’s exhibited performance. For example, share issuances for the acquisition of businesses or assets, in and of themselves, will not increase Mr. Biglari’s incentive compensation for any year or any successive years. Thus, the pay is linked to economic progress. Calculation of increased book value and the incentive compensation payments to Mr. Biglari under the Incentive Agreement are subject to the approval of the Committee, which has sole authority for monitoring and administering the Incentive Agreement. Payments to Mr. Biglari under the Incentive Agreement will not exceed $10 million with respect to any one-year performance period.
High Water Mark. Mr. Biglari will not receive incentive compensation under the Incentive Agreement unless the Corporation’s book value exceeds the previous highest level in book value, or the “high water mark,” plus a 6% growth in book value, i.e., the hurdle rate. As such, in a fiscal year in which book value declines, the marker for subsequent fiscal years will require the complete recovery of the deficit from the last high water mark plus attaining the stated 6% hurdle rate before Mr. Biglari is eligible for a bonus.
Purchase of Common Stock. The Incentive Agreement provides that Mr. Biglari will use an amount equal to at least 30% of his annual pre-tax incentive compensation to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock on the open market within 120 calendar days of his receipt of such payment, subject to restrictions under the Corporation’s insider trading policy. Mr. Biglari is then required to hold such shares for a minimum of three years from the date of purchase, subject to the terms of the Incentive Agreement.
For fiscal 2011, the Company’s adjusted book value increased approximately $32.8 million, or 11.7%, resulting in an incentive bonus payment to Mr. Biglari of $3,992,391. For fiscal 2010, Mr. Biglari’s incentive bonus was determined solely with respect to the fourth fiscal quarter, during which the Company’s adjusted book value grew by 3.2%. Accordingly, a pro rata adjusted book value growth hurdle of approximately 1.4% (based on the number of days in such quarter) was used to determine the incentive bonus payment to Mr. Biglari with respect to such quarter, and the 3.2% increase in the Company’s adjusted book value during such quarter resulted in an incentive bonus payment to Mr. Biglari of $1,206,896.
Mr. Biglari’s current base salary of $900,000 was set during fiscal 2009 by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (prior to being merged with the Governance and Nominating Committee).
Compensation of Interim Chief Financial Officer
The salary and bonus for the Interim Chief Financial Officer in fiscal 2011 and 2010 were based upon the decision of Mr. Biglari. In determining such amounts, Mr. Biglari considered subjective factors such as his perception of the executive’s performance and changes in functional responsibility.
Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Fiscal Year 2009
The base salary of Mr. Biglari was set at $280,000 in fiscal 2008. On June 19, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (prior to being merged with the Governance and Nominating Committee) voted unanimously to increase Mr. Biglari’s salary to $900,000 per year. Mr. Biglari did not receive any stock or stock option grants. The Compensation Committee also noted that Mr. Biglari, through related entities, had significant economic interests in the Corporation, further aligning his interests with the Corporation’s shareholders. In determining to increase Mr. Biglari’s salary, the Compensation Committee did not use a compensation consultant because the Corporation’s remuneration was far less than that of the peer group. The Compensation Committee relied upon its subjective judgment and considered a variety of factors, including the Corporation’s financial performance.
Salaries for other named executive officers in fiscal 2009 were either based upon prior employment agreements or upon the decision of Mr. Biglari. Bonus payment decisions were made by Mr. Biglari, at his discretion. In addition, bonus eligibility was predicated on the Corporation’s generating free cash flow. He also considered subjective factors such as his perception of the executive’s performance and changes in functional responsibility, and operating results over which the executive had authority. The Compensation Committee was apprised of the final bonus determinations by Mr. Biglari, of which it approved.
In fiscal 2009, perquisites provided to executive officers were dramatically reduced, consistent with our performance-based compensation philosophy. Our executive officers also receive the benefits provided to all employees, subject to satisfying the requirements for participation, including participation in the 401(k) Plan, life insurance equal to their annual salary up to a maximum of $350,000, group medical and dental plans and short- and long-term disability insurance. The executive officers are also entitled to participate in The Steak n Shake Non-Qualified Savings Plan, a plan which is only open to those who are “highly compensated” under IRS regulations.
Employment Agreements, Severance, and Change-in-Control Arrangements
Current Structure
Mr. Biglari does not have an employment agreement with the Corporation. The Incentive Agreement remains in effect as long as Mr. Biglari remains the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, but does not alter his at-will employment arrangement with the Company.
On January 26, 2010, the Corporation and Mr. Geiger terminated his prior agreement concerning employment, severance, or change in control. Instead the Corporation and Mr. Geiger entered into a new, simpler agreement. The new contractual obligation stipulates that, only in the event Mr. Biglari ceases to be Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, shall Mr. Geiger have the option of terminating his employment with the Corporation and receiving a lump sum severance payment equal to one year of his then current base compensation. The new accord, unlike the prior one, does not contemplate or contractually bind the Corporation to severance payment in the event of termination without cause.
Termination Events Under the Incentive Agreement
If, on or prior to the third anniversary of the Incentive Agreement, there is a change in control of the Corporation, Mr. Biglari is terminated by the Corporation without “cause” or Mr. Biglari resigns for “good reason,” Mr. Biglari has the option, exercisable within 30 days after the occurrence of any such event, to repurchase Biglari Capital from the Corporation for a purchase price equal to Biglari Capital’s adjusted capital balance, in its capacity as general partner of the Lion Fund, through the repurchase date, less any distributions in respect of such amount previously received by the Corporation, which is the equivalent formula used to determine the purchase price paid to Mr. Biglari for the acquisition of Biglari Capital.
If the option described in the preceding paragraph expires unexercised after three years, and after such time there is a change in control of the Corporation, Mr. Biglari is terminated by the Corporation without “cause” or Mr. Biglari resigns for “good reason,” Mr. Biglari will be entitled to receive a severance payment equal to 299% of the average annual cash compensation (consisting of his base salary and incentive compensation) paid to him since the date of the Incentive Agreement, subject to reduction to the extent necessary so that no portion of the severance payment will be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Effect of a Change in Control, Death, Disability or Retirement on Equity Grants
Prior to fiscal 2009, equity-based incentives were a significant element of total executive officer compensation. These equity-based incentives consisted of stock options and restricted stock.
In the event of the death of an option recipient, then his/her estate may exercise the option in full at any time prior to its expiration. In the event of an option recipient’s retirement, he/she may exercise any vested options within three months from the date of retirement. Should an option recipient’s employment end as a result of a disability, then he/she would be able to exercise the options as if the recipient had remained with the Corporation through (i) cessation of payments under a disability pay plan of the Corporation, (ii) the recipient’s death, or (iii) the recipient’s 65th birthday.
All prior restricted stock plans, the 2006 Steak n Shake Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan contain provisions that accelerate the vesting of the awards upon a change in control. Options granted under prior stock option plans may be accelerated upon a change in control at the discretion of the Board.
The number of unvested shares that would vest on a change in control, and the value of those shares as of the end of the fiscal year, is set forth in the table below entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End.”
During fiscal year 2010, we resolved to suspend, indefinitely, all future option grants and placed a moratorium on the issuance of restricted stock.
Deductibility Cap on Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a federal income tax deduction to any publicly held corporation for compensation to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, or any of the three other most highly compensated executive officers in excess of $1 million in any taxable year. Payments made pursuant to the Incentive Agreement, however, are intended to qualify as “performance based compensation,” eligible for continued deductibility with shareholder approval. To preserve the tax deductibility of such compensation, the Corporation sought and obtained approval of the Incentive Agreement at the November 5, 2010 special meeting of shareholders.
In fiscal 2011, we did not pay compensation that was not deductible under Section 162(m).
Compensation Policies Relating to Risk Management
The Committee believes that our compensation policies and practices do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking and that any risks arising from our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation.
Summary Compensation Information
The following table shows the compensation paid to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, who are the Company’s only executive officers and whom we refer to herein collectively as our “Named Executive Officers,” for the 2011, 2010 and 2009 fiscal years.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and
Principal
Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)a
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sardar Biglari,
|
|
2011
|
|
$ |
900,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
3,992,391 |
|
|
$ |
30,264 |
b |
|
$ |
4,922,655 |
|
|
Chairman / Chief
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
900,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,206,896 |
|
|
$ |
15,660 |
|
|
$ |
2,122,556 |
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
467,231 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
48,214 |
|
|
$ |
515,445 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duane Geiger,
|
|
2011
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
12,830 |
|
|
$ |
412,830 |
|
|
Interim Chief
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
11,389 |
|
|
$ |
371,389 |
|
|
Financial Officer
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
194,712 |
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8,185 |
|
|
$ |
292,897 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a.
|
Represents incentive bonus payment made in accordance with the terms of the Incentive Agreement.
|
|
b.
|
Includes the value of director’s fees ($30,000) received by Mr. Biglari from serving on the Board of Directors of CCA Industries, in which the Company has a significant ownership interest.
|
Plan-Based Award Grants
The Corporation does not grant any awards under its equity incentive plans because they have been suspended indefinitely. Under the terms of the Incentive Agreement, the maximum incentive payment that Mr. Biglari may receive with respect to fiscal 2012 is $10 million.
Outstanding Equity Awards
The following table sets forth certain information about outstanding option awards held by the Named Executive Officers as of the end of fiscal 2011. There were no unvested restricted stock awards held by the Named Executive Officers as of the end of fiscal 2011. The information provided in this table reflects the 1-for-20 reverse stock split effective as of the end of business December 18, 2009.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END
| |
|
|
|
Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
Option Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
|
Mr. Biglari
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Geiger
|
349a
|
—
|
324.40
|
5/11/12
|
| |
375b
|
—
|
349.40
|
2/8/16
|
| |
365b
|
—
|
354.40
|
2/6/17
|
| |
820b
|
—
|
149.60
|
4/12/18
|
|
a.
|
These are "reload" options which were issued pursuant to the 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan. Until February 2006, options granted by the Company included a reload feature whereby, upon exercise of the underlying stock options, reload options were issued in an amount equal to the number of shares used to pay the exercise price on the underlying options. The reload options vested immediately and expire five years from the date of issuance. Beginning in February 2006 we ceased granting options with a reload feature.
|
|
b.
|
These options vest at a rate of 25% per year beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and expire ten years from the date of grant; they do not contain a reload feature.
|
Award Exercise and Vesting
The following table sets forth the number of shares of restricted stock that vested during the year, with concurrent vesting of book units, and the resulting value realized by the Named Executive Officer. The information provided in this table reflects the 1-for-20 reverse stock split effective as of the end of business December 18, 2009. No options were exercised by the Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2011.
|
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting
|
|
Value Realized on Vestinga
|
|
Mr. Geiger
|
|
520
|
|
$207,719
|
|
a.
|
Mr. Geiger had stock vest on April 12, 2011. The amount in this column includes the value of the restricted stock on the date of vesting, based on the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of vesting, or immediately prior thereto if the vesting date was not a trading day ($399.46), and the value of book units which vested in conjunction with the shares of restricted stock. The book units associated with vesting were $0.
|
Retirement Benefits
We maintain two plans that provide retirement income to all eligible employees, including the Named Executive Officers:
401(k) Plan
The Steak n Shake 401(k) Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) is a defined contribution plan covering substantially all employees, including the Named Executive Officers, after they have attained age 21 and completed six months of service and allows employees to defer up to 20% of their salaries. The Corporation made non-discretionary matching contributions through October 14, 2008. The matching contributions during fiscal year 2009 were equal to 50% of participants’ pretax contributions and subject to a maximum of 6% of participants’ eligible compensation contributed to the 401(k) Plan. During October 2008, the 401(k) Plan was amended to eliminate the non-discretionary contributions and allow for discretionary matching contributions. No discretionary matching contributions were made in fiscal year 2009. Discretionary matching contributions were resumed in fiscal year 2010 and were also made in fiscal year 2011. Going forward, discretionary contributions will be based on the profitability of the Corporation and subject to quarterly revision. The Named Executive Officers and other “highly compensated employees” (as that term is defined by IRS regulations) are limited to contributing 2% of their cash compensation to the 401(k) Plan.
Non-Qualified Savings Plan
The Steak n Shake Non-Qualified Savings Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) is available to all highly compensated employees, including the Named Executive Officers. Investment options offered under the Deferred Compensation Plan are identical to those offered in the 401(k) Plan. Before a participant may make contributions under the Deferred Compensation Plan, the participant must first contribute 2% of his or her earnings to the 401(k) Plan. Until November 2008 we matched participant contributions in the amount of 50% of the aggregate deferrals into both plans, up to 6% of the participant’s cash compensation. Matching contributions were suspended in November 2008. Matching contributions were resumed in fiscal year 2010 and were also made in fiscal year 2011. Total deferrals under both the Deferred Compensation Plan and 401(k) Plan are limited to 20% of the aggregate of a participant’s salary and annual incentive bonus, which means that as a result of the 2% of compensation deferred to the 401(k) Plan, the most a participant may defer to the Deferred Compensation Plan is 18% of his or her total cash compensation. Matching contributions under the Deferred Compensation Plan vest over the first six years of employment, at a rate of 20% per year beginning on the second anniversary of employment. A participant’s account balance will be distributed at a time directed by the participant. Participants may elect that distributions be made in a lump sum or in equal annual installments over a period of up to ten (10) years. Withdrawals from the Deferred Compensation Plan are limited to the withdrawal of participant contributions in cases of financial hardship.
The following table describes the contributions, earnings and balance at the end of fiscal 2011 for each of the Named Executive Officers who participated in the Deferred Compensation Plan.
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Yeara
|
|
|
Company Contributions
in Last Fiscal Yearb
|
|
|
Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year
|
|
|
Distributions in Last
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-end
|
|
|
Mr. Geiger
|
|
$ |
15,169 |
|
|
$ |
2,611 |
|
|
$ |
(4,052 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
21,200 |
|
|
a.
|
The amounts in this column are also included in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Salary” column.
|
|
b.
|
The amounts in this column are also included in the Summary Compensation Table in the “All Other Compensation” column.
|
Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment
As discussed above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Employment Agreements, Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements– Effect of a Change in Control, Death, Disability or Retirement on Equity Grants,” some of our prior equity awards accelerate upon a change in control or upon the retirement, death or disability of the holder. All prior equity awards granted to Mr. Geiger have vested. In January 2010, the Company and Mr. Geiger entered into an agreement that provides that only in the event Mr. Biglari ceases to be Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company does Mr. Geiger have the option of terminating his employment with the Company and receiving a lump sum severance payment equal to one year of his then current base compensation ($200,000 as of the end of fiscal 2011).
For a description of the rights to which Mr. Biglari is entitled in the event of a change in control of the Corporation, Mr. Biglari’s termination by the Corporation without “cause” or Mr. Biglari’s resignation for “good reason,” see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Employment Agreements, Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements – Termination Events Under the Incentive Agreement.” Mr. Biglari has not received any stock awards from the Corporation.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Corporation’s officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Corporation’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. Officers, directors and greater than ten-percent shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Corporation with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it, and written representations from certain reporting persons that no Section 16(a) forms were required for those persons, the Corporation believes that during fiscal 2011 all filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than ten-percent shareholders were complied with.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table details information regarding our existing equity compensation plans as of September 28, 2011:
|
|
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
|
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
|
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
|
|
| |
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
13,579 |
|
|
$ |
282.44 |
|
|
|
27,742 |
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13,579 |
|
|
$ |
282.44 |
|
|
|
27,742 |
|
During fiscal year 2010, we resolved to suspend, indefinitely, all future option grants and placed a moratorium on the issuance of restricted stock.
During fiscal year 2011, the Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board consisted of Kenneth R. Cooper, Philip L. Cooley, Ruth J. Person, John W. Ryan (until his death in August 2011) and William J. Regan, Jr. (until April 7, 2011). None of these individuals has at any time been an officer or employee of the Corporation. During fiscal year 2011, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity for which a member of our Board or Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee served as an executive officer.
GOVERNANCE, COMPENSATION, AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE REPORT
The Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board (the “Committee”) is currently composed of the persons identified below. The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement on pages 19 to 25. Based on the Committee’s review and discussions with management, it recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2011, and this proxy statement. Submitted by the members of the Committee:
Kenneth R. Cooper, Philip L. Cooley, William L. Johnson and Ruth J. Person.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table shows as of March 15, 2012 the number and percentage of outstanding shares of our Common Stock beneficially owned by each person or entity known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Stock:
Name & Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
|
Sardar Biglari
17802 IH 10 West, Suite 400
San Antonio, Texas 78257
|
|
220,767 (1)
|
|
|
15.4
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAMCO Investors, Inc.
One Corporate Center
Rye, New York 10580-1435
|
|
131,080 (2)
|
|
|
9.1
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blackrock, Inc.
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
|
|
103,700 (3)
|
|
|
7.2
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
Palisades West, Building One
6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, Texas 78746
|
|
90,035 (4)
|
|
|
6.3
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kovitz Investment Group, LLC
115 S. LaSalle St., 27th Floor
Chicago, IL 60603
|
|
78,719 (5)
|
|
|
5.5
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
|
|
78,597 (6)
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
1)
|
This information was obtained from a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on June 23, 2010 by the Lion Fund, Biglari Capital, Western, Western Acquisitions L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Western Investments Inc., a Delaware corporation, Sardar Biglari, Philip L. Cooley, the 401(k) Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan, and the most recent Form 4 filed with the SEC by certain of the foregoing persons. By virtue of his relationships with the other reporting persons discussed in the Schedule 13D/A, Mr. Biglari may be deemed to have the sole power to vote and dispose of the shares beneficially owned by the reporting persons, other than the shares held under each of the 401(k) Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan and the shares beneficially owned by Dr. Cooley. Mr. Biglari has sole power to direct the voting of the shares held under each of the 401(k) Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan. Mr. Biglari shares with Dr. Cooley the power to vote and dispose of the shares beneficially owned by Dr. Cooley. Mr. Biglari disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares that he does not directly own.
|
|
2)
|
This information was obtained from a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on June 4, 2010.
|
|
3)
|
This information was obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2012.
|
|
4)
|
This information was obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2012.
|
|
5)
|
This information was obtained from a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2012.
|
|
6)
|
This information was obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2012.
|
The following table shows the total number of shares of our Common Stock beneficially owned as of March 15, 2012 and the percentage of outstanding shares for (i) each director, (ii) each Named Executive Officer, and (iii) all directors and executive officers, as a group:
Name & Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
|
Sardar Biglari
|
|
220,767
|
(1) |
|
15.4
|
|
Philip L. Cooley
|
|
4,752
|
(2) |
|
*
|
|
Duane E. Geiger
|
|
3,327
|
(3) |
|
*
|
|
Kenneth R. Cooper
|
|
120
|
|
|
*
|
|
William L. Johnson
|
|
100
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ruth J. Person
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons)
|
|
224,493
|
(4) |
|
15.6
|
* Less than 1%
All information provided in the above tables reflects the 1-for-20 reverse stock split effective as of the end of business December 18, 2009.
|
1)
|
Includes 9,263 shares owned directly by Mr. Biglari, 203,357 shares owned directly by the Lion Fund, 2,386 shares owned directly by Western Acquisitions, L.P., 888 shares held under the 401(k) Plan, 121 shares held under the Deferred Compensation Plan and 4,752 shares beneficially owned by Dr. Cooley. See footnote 1 above.
|
|
2)
|
Includes 550 shares owned by Dr. Cooley’s spouse. Dr. Cooley disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
|
|
3)
|
Includes 1,909 shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock options and 127 shares held under the 401(k) Plan and 51 shares held under the Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
|
4)
|
Includes 1,909 shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock options.
|
Deloitte & Touche LLP has advised us that they have billed or will bill us the following amounts for services for each of the last two fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$ |
544,320 |
|
|
$ |
657,551 |
|
|
Audit-Related Fees(2)
|
|
|
39,200 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
Tax Fees(3)
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Total Fees for the Applicable Fiscal Year
|
|
$ |
588,020 |
|
|
$ |
777,551 |
|
__________________
|
(1)
|
Audit fees include fees for services performed for the audit of our annual financial statements including services related to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and review of financial statements included in our Form 10-Q filings, Form 10-K filing and Form S-8 and S-4 Registration Statements, comment letters and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements. Audit fees for fiscal 2010 have been adjusted to include fees related to the audit of the Lion Fund’s financial statements.
|
|
(2)
|
Audit-Related Fees include fees for assurance and related services performed that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements. This includes services provided to audit the 401(k) Plan.
|
|
(3)
|
Tax Fees are fees for services performed with respect to tax compliance, tax advice and other tax review.
|
The Audit Committee's policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent auditor and management are required to report periodically to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditor in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. In each of fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Audit Committee pre-approved the services reported above as audit-related services and tax fees and Deloitte & Touche LLP did not provide any other services during such years.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation and its subsidiaries set forth in Item 8 of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2011 with management of the Corporation and Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent public accountants for the Corporation.
The Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) in Rule 3200T. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP required by the applicable PCAOB requirements for independent accountant communications with audit committees with respect to auditor independence and has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP its independence from the Corporation.
Based on the review and discussions with management of the Corporation and Deloitte & Touche LLP referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Corporation include the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation and subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2011 in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2011.
It is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Corporation’s financial statements are complete and accurate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; that is the responsibility of management and the Corporation’s independent public accountants. In giving its recommendation to the Board, the Audit Committee has relied on (i) management’s representation that such financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and (ii) the reports of the Corporation’s independent public accountants with respect to such financial statements.
Submitted by the members of the Audit Committee of the Board.
Philip L. Cooley, Chairman
Ruth J. Person
Kenneth R. Cooper
William L. Johnson
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this proxy statement constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. You can identify these statements from our use of the words “plan,” “forecast,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “target,” “is likely,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements may include, among other things:
|
|
·
|
statements and assumptions relating to financial performance;
|
|
|
·
|
statements relating to the anticipated effects on results of operations or financial condition of recent or future developments or events;
|
|
|
·
|
statements relating to our capital raising activities, business and growth strategies; and
|
|
|
·
|
any other statements, projections or assumptions that are not historical facts.
|
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from our expectations of future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In addition, our past results of operations do not necessarily indicate our future results. We discuss these and other uncertainties in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2011. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any of these statements in light of future events.
The Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2011 accompanies this proxy statement, but is not deemed a part of the proxy soliciting material.
A copy of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2011, as amended, as required to be filed with the SEC, excluding exhibits, will be mailed to shareholders without charge upon written request to the Secretary of the Corporation at 17802 IH 10 West, Suite 400, San Antonio, Texas 78257. Such request must set forth a good-faith representation that the requesting party was either a holder of record or a beneficial owner of the Common Stock of the Corporation on the Record Date. Exhibits to the Form 10-K will be mailed upon similar request and payment of specified fees. The Corporation’s Form 10-K, as amended, is also available through the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov).
Any shareholder proposal intended to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement for presentation at the 2013 Annual Meeting must be received by the Corporation by November 9, 2012. The proposal must be in accordance with the provisions of Rule 14a-8 promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act. It is suggested the proposal be submitted by certified mail – return receipt requested. The Corporation reserves the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements.
As of the date of this proxy statement, our Board does not know of any matter that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than as described in this proxy statement. As to other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that proxies properly executed and returned will be voted in respect thereof at the discretion of the person voting the proxies in accordance with his best judgment.
|
By order of the Board,
|
| |
| /s/ Duane E. Geiger |
|
|
|
Duane E. Geiger
|
|
Secretary
|
San Antonio, Texas
March 15, 2012
|
|
4
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
BIGLARI HOLDINGS INC.
17802 IH 10 WEST
SUITE 400
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78257
|
|
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
Electronic Delivery of Future PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
|
|
Investor Address Line 1
Investor Address Line 2
Investor Address Line 3
Investor Address Line 4
Investor Address Line 5
John Sample
1234 ANYWHERE STREET
ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1
|
1
of
2
|
| |
|
|
| |
CONTROL # →
|
000000000000
|
|
| |
|
|
|
NAME
THE COMPANY NAME INC. - COMMON
THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS A
THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS B
THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS C
THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS D
THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS E
THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS F
THE COMPANY NAME INC. - 401 K
|
SHARES
|
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
|
| |
Page 1 of 2
|
| |
|
|
|
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: x
|
| |
|
|
|
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
|
|
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
|
| |
|
|
|
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:
1. Election of Directors
Nominees
|
For
All
|
Withhold
All
|
For All
Except
|
|
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
|
|
01 Sardar Biglari 02 Philip L. Cooley 03 Kenneth R. Cooper 04 William L. Johnson 05 Ruth J. Person
|
o
|
o
|
o
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR Proposals 2 and 3:
|
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|
2
|
To ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2012 fiscal year.
|
|
o
|
o
|
o
|
|
3
|
Non-binding advisory resolution to approve the Corporation’s executive compensation, as described in these proxy materials.
|
|
o
|
o
|
o
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote 3 YEARS on Proposal 4:
|
3 Years
|
2 Years
|
1 Year
|
Abstain
|
|
4
|
Non-binding advisory resolution on the frequency of holding future shareholder advisory votes on the Corporation’s executive compensation.
|
o
|
o
|
o
|
o
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST Proposal 5:
|
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|
5
|
To approve one Humane Society of the United States shareholder proposal.
|
|
o
|
o
|
o
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.
|
|
Investor Address Line 1
Investor Address Line 2
Investor Address Line 3
Investor Address Line 4
Investor Address Line 5
John Sample
1234 ANYWHERE STREET
ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1
|