|
First,
offer our view on the changes to RFP-BARDA-09-35 for the acquisition of a
smallpox anti-viral drug for therapeutic use into the Strategic National
Stockpile
|
|
Second,
explain the unique nature of our drug candidate ST-246 to the many of you
on the call new to SIGA and to enhance the understanding of those of you
who know us already, and
|
|
Third,
to address important, frequent questions we’ve been asked over the past
several days.
|
|
First,
the intent to contract with one or more offerors
versus a single
offeror,
|
|
Second,
relaxation of the mandatory eligibility requirement for the provision of
evidence of product efficacy in non-human primates,
and
|
|
Third,
affirmation of the need to provide evidence for therapeutic index in
non-human primate models under an eventual
contract. Therapeutic index is the ratio of the drug dose which
produces an undesired effect to the dose which causes the desired
effect.
|
|
First,
BARDA continues to actively pursue its objective to acquire a therapeutic
smallpox antiviral drug into the Strategic National
Stockpile.
|
|
Second,
we believe SIGA remains uniquely qualified as an offeror for this RFP,
with consistent evidence of the excellent therapeutic index of ST-246 in
multiple non-human primate tests using the smallpox virus itself and
monkeypox.
|
|
Third,
proof of efficacy in non-human primates remains a substantial barrier to
entry that our competitors will need to overcome to commercialize their
product candidates. We believe we have at least a three year lead compared
to any other potential product candidate in regard to non-human primate
efficacy testing.
|
|
|
First,
were we aware of BARDA’s intention to amend its smallpox anti-viral RFP
prior to its posting at 10:01 am eastern time on Friday, December
11?
|
|
|
We
were not informed beforehand by BARDA. We learned of the amendment at the
same time as the public and our investors when the amendment was posted to
the FedBizOpps website.
|
|
This
was the seventh time BARDA has amended the agency’s original solicitation.
We have not had either informal or formal advance notice from BARDA
personnel regarding any of these
amendments.
|
|
|
Next
Question: Why did we undertake an offering of the stock last
week?
|
|
|
We
took advantage of the rising demand for our stock and favorable market
conditions. This opportunity provided us with the ability to strengthen
our balance sheet, add liquidity to invest in our programs over the next
several years,
and bring in new
long-term institutional investors. We accomplished this with minimal
dilution to our shareholders.
|
|
|
Next
Question: What is the Company’s confidence level toward the
commercialization of ST-246 in light of this RFP
Amendment?
|
|
|
We
continue to believe that ST-246 remains the best candidate under the
RFP. In particular, we believe ST-246’s safety and efficacy
data best meet the RFP’s criteria and we believe that SIGA is also best
positioned to meet all of the other criteria in the RFP. Those
additional criteria include having a validated manufacturing process and a
secure supply chain. We have consistently disclosed, however that BARDA
may or may not complete the purchase of a smallpox antiviral or may do so
on terms that differ from the current RFP.
|
|
While
Friday’s changes to the RFP may make it possible for another drug to
qualify and win an award as well, we believe that any award on the merits
should result in an award to SIGA. In short, we remain as highly
confident of the commercialization prospects of our drug in the near
future as at any time in our corporate
history.
|
|
|
Will
the changes in the RFP delay a contract for the
RFP?
|
|
|
The
original RFP solicitation stated the intent to come to contract by
September 2009, while BARDA officials have previously stated their
expectation to complete a contract by the end of calendar year
2009. We believe it is unlikely we will consummate a contract
in this calendar year, but we have been engaged with BARDA contracting
personnel in an active, diligent process regarding technical aspects of
our proposal, physical and informational security at our laboratories and
our manufacturing contractors’ plants, and pricing. We don’t
believe that Friday’s amendments to the RFP will adversely affect our
prospects in this process.
|
|
Also,
we don’t believe the December 11th
amendment will create a long process delay, so we continue to await the
finalization of the amendment on or about December 28. We find
this process to be entirely consistent with the contracting processes we
have engaged in with HHS and DOD for our prior grants and contracts. We
have the highest respect for the diligence and integrity of the process
and our government partners.
|
|
|
If
BARDA makes awards to multiple contractors, will that diminish SIGA’s
share of the base acquisition of 1.7 million courses of
drug?
|
|
|
While
this is certainly possible, we believe we are best able to deliver the
entire 1.7 million courses as rapidly as possible. Our pricing
proposal only contemplated an order for the entire 1.7 million
courses. We believe that BARDA has shown an understanding both
in this RFP and its acquisitions that lower volumes deserve higher unit
pricing.
|
|
|
Will
these delays postpone potential delivery of ST-246 into the strategic
national stockpile?
|
|
|
We
have already produced 20,000 courses of ST-246 in our FDA registration
batches and plan to produce 300,000 more courses in early 2010 in our
commercial validation process. This activity is funded by the $20 million
increase to our ST-246 therapeutic development contract which BARDA
awarded to us in September 2008. We believe that if we complete
a contract in the first quarter of 2010, we can fulfill our plan to begin
delivery of our drug into the strategic national stockpile in late
2010.
|