UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X]
|
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31,
2008.
|
or
[ ] Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the Transition Periodfrom to .
Commission
File Number: 0-26494
GSE SYSTEMS,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
52-1868008
|
(State of
incorporation)
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
7133 Rutherford Rd., Suite
200, Baltimore, MD 21244
(Address
of principal executive office and zip code)
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (410)
277-3740
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No
[ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large
accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated
filer [ X ]
|
Non-accelerated
filer [ ]
|
Smaller
reporting company [ ]
|
|
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule
12(b)-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes [ ] No
[X]
There
were 15,656,517 shares of common stock, with a par value of $.01 per share
outstanding as of May 12, 2008.
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC.
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
INDEX
|
|
PAGE
|
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
3
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2008 and
December
31, 2007
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended
March
31, 2008 and March 31, 2007
|
4
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007
|
5
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Three
Months
Ended March 31, 2008
|
6
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended
March
31, 2008 and March 31, 2007
|
7
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
8
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and
Financial
Condition
|
16
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
24
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
25
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
26
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
26
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
26
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
26
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
26
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
26
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
26
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
26
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
27
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
(in
thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2008
|
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
4,080 |
|
|
$ |
8,172 |
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
2,228 |
|
Contract
receivables
|
|
|
14,413 |
|
|
|
10,721 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
21,834 |
|
|
|
22,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment
and leasehold improvements, net
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
Software
development costs, net
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
Long-term
restricted cash
|
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
1,925 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
28,496 |
|
|
$ |
28,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
2,231 |
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
Accrued
compensation and payroll taxes
|
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
Billings
in excess of revenue earned
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
Accrued
warranty
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
Other
current liabilities
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
7,612 |
|
|
|
7,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
8,346 |
|
|
|
7,999 |
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock $.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
issued and outstanding none in 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common
stock $.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
issued and outstanding 15,639,129 in 2008 and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,508,014
in 2007
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
49,195 |
|
|
|
49,225 |
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(28,421 |
) |
|
|
(28,128 |
) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(780 |
) |
|
|
(887 |
) |
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
20,150 |
|
|
|
20,365 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$ |
28,496 |
|
|
$ |
28,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
revenue
|
|
$ |
7,083 |
|
|
$ |
7,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
5,218 |
|
|
|
5,651 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
1,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
Other
expense, net
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock dividends
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss attributed to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(293 |
) |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
loss per common share
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
loss per common share
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ (293)
|
|
$ 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
|
107
|
|
(54)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
loss
|
|
$ (186)
|
|
$ (23)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
|
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
(in
thousands)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance,
January 1, 2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
15,508 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
49,225 |
|
|
$ |
(28,128 |
) |
|
$ |
(887 |
) |
|
$ |
20,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Common
stock issued for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
options
exercised, net of 30,645 shares returned to GSE to pay for employee's
income tax liabilities of $251,000.
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
Common
stock issued for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
services
provided
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Foreign
currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustment
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
Balance,
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
15,639 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
49,195 |
|
|
$ |
(28,421 |
) |
|
$ |
(780 |
) |
|
$ |
20,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(293 |
) |
|
$ |
31 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used
in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Capitalized
software amortization
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Elimination
of profit on Emirates Simulation Academy, LLC contract
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Equity
loss on investment in Emirates Simulation Academy, LLC
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
receivables
|
|
|
(3,692 |
) |
|
|
(634 |
) |
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
Accounts
payable, accrued compensation and accrued expenses
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
Billings
in excess of revenues earned
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(425 |
) |
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(3,618 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
Capitalized
software development costs
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
Investment
in Emirates Simulation Academy, LLC
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Release
(restriction) of cash as collateral under letters of
credit
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease
in borrowings under lines of credit
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(520 |
) |
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
Tax
benefit from option exercises
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(4,092 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
8,172 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
4,080 |
|
|
$ |
960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For
the Three Months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
1.
|
Basis
of Presentation and Revenue
Recognition
|
Basis
of Presentation
The
consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by GSE
Systems, Inc. (the “Company” or “GSE”) without independent audit. In
the opinion of the Company's management, all adjustments and reclassifications
of a normal and recurring nature necessary to present fairly the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented have
been made. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or
omitted. The results of operations for interim periods are not
necessarily an indication of the results for the full year. These
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2008.
The
Company has only one reportable segment. The Company has a wide range
of knowledge of simulation systems and the processes those systems are intended
to control and model. The Company’s knowledge is concentrated heavily
in simulation technology and model development. The Company is
primarily engaged in simulation for the power generation industry and the
process industries. Contracts typically range from 12 months to three
years.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements as well as reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. The Company’s most significant estimates relate to
revenue recognition, capitalization of software development costs, and the
recoverability of deferred tax assets. Actual results could
differ from these estimates and those differences could be
material.
Revenue
Recognition
The
majority of the Company’s revenue is derived through the sale of uniquely
designed systems containing hardware, software and other materials under
fixed-price contracts. In accordance with Statement of Position 81-1,
Accounting for Performance of
Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, the revenue
under these fixed-price contracts is accounted for on the
percentage-of-completion method. This methodology recognizes revenue and
earnings as work progresses on the contract and is based on an estimate of the
revenue and earnings earned to date, less amounts recognized in prior
periods. The Company bases its estimate of the degree of completion
of the contract by reviewing the relationship of costs incurred to date to the
expected total costs that will be incurred on the project. Estimated contract
earnings are reviewed and revised periodically as the work progresses, and the
cumulative effect of any change in estimate is recognized in the period in which
the change is identified. Estimated losses are charged against earnings in the
period such losses are identified. The Company recognizes revenue
arising from contract claims either as income or as an offset against a
potential loss only when the amount of the claim can be estimated reliably and
realization is probable and there is a legal basis of the
claim. There were no claims outstanding as of March 31,
2008.
Uncertainties
inherent in the performance of contracts include labor availability and
productivity, material costs, change order scope and pricing, software
modification and customer acceptance issues. The reliability of these
cost estimates is critical to the Company’s revenue recognition as a significant
change in the estimates can cause the Company’s revenue and related margins to
change significantly from the amounts estimated in the early stages of the
project.
As the
Company recognizes revenue under the percentage-of-completion method, it
provides an accrual for estimated future warranty costs based on historical and
projected claims experience. The Company’s long-term contracts
generally provide for a one-year warranty on parts, labor and any bug fixes as
it relates to software embedded in the systems.
The
Company’s system design contracts do not normally provide for “post customer
support service” (PCS) in terms of software upgrades, software enhancements or
telephone support. In order to obtain PCS, the customers must
normally purchase a separate contract. Such PCS arrangements are
generally for a one-year period renewable annually and include customer support,
unspecified software upgrades, and maintenance releases. The Company
recognizes revenue from these contracts ratably over the life of the agreements
in accordance with Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition.
Revenue
from the sale of software licenses which do not require significant
modifications or customization for the Company’s modeling tools are recognized
when the license agreement is signed, the license fee is fixed and determinable,
delivery has occurred, and collection is considered probable.
Revenue
for contracts with multiple elements are recognized in accordance with Emerging
Issues Task Force Issue 00-21, Accounting for Revenue Arrangements
with Multiple Deliverables.
Revenues
from certain consulting or training contracts are recognized on a
time-and-material basis. For time-and-material type contracts,
revenue is recognized based on hours incurred at a contracted labor rate plus
expenses.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Emirates Simulation Academy, LLC
(UAE) provided approximately 16.6% and 34.9%, respectively, of the Company’s
consolidated revenue; Emerson Process Management provided approximately 17.4%
and 4.9%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated revenue, and Rosenergoatom
Federal State Owned Enterprise (Russia) provided approximately 6.8% and 14.7%,
respectively, of the Company’s consolidated revenue.
Contract
receivables unbilled totaled $5.2 million and $6.6 million as of March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively. In April 2008, the Company
invoiced $2.9 million of the unbilled amounts.
2.
|
Basic
and Diluted Loss Per Common Share
|
Basic
loss per share is based on the weighted average number of outstanding common
shares for the period. Diluted loss per share adjusts the weighted
average shares outstanding for the potential dilution that could occur if stock
options, warrants or convertible preferred stock were exercised or converted
into common stock. The number of common shares and common share
equivalents used in the determination of basic and diluted loss per share were
as follows:
(in
thousands, except for share amounts)
|
|
Three
Months ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(293 |
) |
|
$ |
31 |
|
Preferred
stock dividends
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
Net
loss attributed to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
(293 |
) |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
shares outstanding for basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings
per share
|
|
|
15,519,413 |
|
|
|
11,709,613 |
|
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
stock options, warrants,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
options
outside the plan and convertible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preferred
stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Adjusted
weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
assumed conversions for diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings
per share
|
|
|
15,519,413 |
|
|
|
11,709,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
related to dilutive securities excluded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
because
inclusion would be anti-dilutive
|
|
|
1,273,635 |
|
|
|
3,050,698 |
|
The net
income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was decreased by preferred
stock dividends of $49,000 in calculating the per share
amounts. Conversion of outstanding stock options and warrants was not
assumed for either the three months ended March 31, 2008 nor the three months
ended March 31, 2007 because the impact was anti-dilutive. Also,
conversion of the convertible preferred stock was not assumed for the three
months ended March 31, 2007.
3.
|
Software
Development Costs
|
Certain
computer software development costs are capitalized in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. Capitalization of computer software
development costs begins upon the establishment of technological
feasibility. Capitalization ceases and amortization of capitalized
costs begins when the software product is commercially available for general
release to customers. Amortization of capitalized computer software
development costs is included in cost of revenue and is determined using the
straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product,
not to exceed five years.
Software
development costs capitalized were $193,000 and $135,000 for the quarters ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Total amortization expense was
$71,000 and $86,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
4.
|
Investment
in Emirates Simulation Academy, LLC
|
On
November 8, 2005, the Emirates Simulation Academy, LLC (“ESA”), headquartered in
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, was formed to build and operate
simulation training academies in the Arab Gulf Region. These
simulation training centers will be designed to train and certify indigenous
workers for deployment to critical infrastructure facilities including power
plants, oil refineries, petro-chemical plants, desalination units and other
industrial facilities. The members of the limited liability company
include Al Qudra Holding PJSC of the United Arab Emirates (60% ownership), the
Centre of Excellence for Applied Research and Training of the United Arab
Emirates (30% ownership) and GSE (10% ownership). At March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007, GSE’s investment in ESA totaled $467,000 and $445,000,
respectively, and was included on the balance sheet in other
assets. The Company accounts for its investment in ESA using the
equity method. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the
Company recognized a $25,000 equity loss on its investment in
ESA. The equity loss was recorded in other income
(expense).
In
January 2006, GSE received a $15.1 million contract from ESA to supply five
simulators and an integrated training program. A $1.8 million change order was
received from ESA in late 2007 increasing the total order value to $16.9
million. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the
Company recognized $1.2 million and $2.7 million, respectively, of contract
revenue on this project using the percentage-of-completion method, which
accounted for 16.6% and 34.9% of the Company’s consolidated revenue for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. At March 31, 2008,
$53,000 of backlog remained on the ESA project. In accordance with
the equity method, the Company has eliminated 10% of the profit from this
contract as the training simulators are assets that will be recorded on the
books of ESA, and the Company is thus required to eliminate its proportionate
share of the profit included in the asset value. The profit
elimination totaled $39,000 and $121,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively, and has been recorded as an other expense
in the income statement and as an other liability on the balance
sheet. Once ESA begins to amortize the training simulators on
their books, GSE will begin to amortize the other liability to other
income.
At March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had trade receivables from ESA
totaling $3.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The trade
receivable outstanding at December 31, 2007 has not yet been paid by
ESA. The Company has not recorded a reserve against this outstanding
receivable at March 31, 2008 as the Company believes that payment will be
received in full. In addition, the Company had an unbilled receivable
of $1.3 million and $2.8 million for the ESA contract at March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. Under the terms of the contract, the
Company provided a $2.1 million performance bond to ESA that will remain
outstanding until the end of the warranty period on October 31,
2008. The Company has deposited $1.2 million into a restricted,
interest-bearing account at the Union National Bank (“UNB”) in the United Arab
Emirates as a partial guarantee for the $11.8 million credit facility that UNB
has extended to ESA. The guarantee will be in place until the
expiration of the ESA credit facility on December 31, 2014 or earlier if ESA
pays down and terminates the credit facility.
5.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The
Company accounts for its stock-based compensation awards under SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment,
which requires companies to recognize compensation expense for all
equity-based compensation awards issued to employees, directors and
non-employees that are expected to vest. Compensation cost is based
on the fair value of awards as of the grant date. The Company
recognized $146,000 of pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for both the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 under the fair value method in
accordance with SFAS No. 123R.
Line
of Credit
On March
28, 2008, the Company entered into two separate revolving line of credit
agreements for two-year revolving lines of credit with Bank of America, N.A.
(“BOA”), in an aggregate amount of up to $5.0 million. The Company
and its subsidiary, GSE Power Systems, Inc., are jointly and severally liable as
co-borrowers. The credit facilities will enable the Company to borrow
funds to support working capital needs and standby letters of
credit. The first line of credit in the principal amount of up to
$3.5 million will enable the Company to borrow funds up to 90% of eligible
foreign accounts receivable, plus 75% of eligible unbilled foreign receivables
and 100% of the cash collateral pledged to BOA on outstanding letters of credit.
This line of credit will be 90% guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the
United States. The interest rate on this line of credit will be based
on the daily LIBOR rate plus 150 basis points, with interest only payments due
monthly. The second line of credit in the principal amount of up to
$1.5 million will enable the Company to borrow funds up to 80% of domestic
accounts receivable and 30% of domestic unbilled receivables. The
interest rate on this line of credit will be based on the daily LIBOR rate plus
225 basis points, with interest only payments due monthly. The
credit facilities will require the Company to comply with certain financial
ratios and preclude the Company from paying dividends and making acquisitions
beyond certain limits without the bank’s consent. At March 31, 2008,
the Company’s available borrowing base under the two lines of credit was $5.0
million, none of which had been utilized.
As the
Company recognizes revenue under the percentage-of-completion method, it
provides an accrual for estimated future warranty costs based on historical
experience and projected claims. The activity in the warranty account
is as follows:
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
Warranty
provision
|
|
|
244 |
|
Warranty
claims
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
856 |
|
At a
special shareholder’s meeting on December 13, 2007, the Company’s shareholders
approved an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation increasing
GSE’s authorized common stock by 12 million shares to a total of 30 million
shares. In addition, the shareholders approved an amendment to the
Company’s 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan (amended and restated September 25,
2007) (the “Plan”) which increased the number of shares available under the Plan
by 1 million shares to a total of 3.5 million shares and extended the life of
the Plan by an additional 10 years to June 30, 2018. The Company has
reserved 1 million shares of the newly authorized common stock for issuance
pursuant to the provisions of the Plan.
On June
22, 2007, the Company raised $9.2 million, net of associated fees of $768,000,
through the sale of 1,666,667 shares (the “Shares”) of its common stock, $.01
par value per share, by means of a private placement to selected institutional
investors. Each investor received a five-year warrant to purchase GSE
common stock (the “Warrant Shares”) equal to 10% of the shares of common stock
that each investor purchased at an exercise price of $6.00 per share (the
“Warrants”). In aggregate, the Company issued Warrants to purchase a
total of 166,667 shares of GSE common stock.
The
Company filed its registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) in July 2007 covering the offer and sale,
from time to time, of the Shares, the Warrant Shares and shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of warrants that may be issued as liquidated damages
under the terms of a certain registration rights agreement entered into between
the Company and the investors (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) in
connection with the private placement. The Registration Statement
became effective on August 8, 2007 and, pursuant to the provisions of the
Registration Rights Agreement, the Company is obligated to use commercially
reasonable efforts to, after the date on which the Registration Statement
becomes effective, cause the Registration Statement to remain continuously
effective as to all Shares and Warrant Shares, other than for an aggregate of
more than 30 consecutive trading days or for more than an aggregate of 60
trading days in any 12-month period. In the event of a default of the foregoing
obligation, the Company will be required to issue to the investors, as
liquidated damages, on the date the foregoing default occurs and each monthly
anniversary thereafter, a number of warrants (on the same terms as the Warrants)
equal to 2% of the number of Shares then held by such investor, not to exceed
10% of the total number of Shares then held by such investor, and thereafter
cash, in an amount equal to 2% of the aggregate purchase price paid by the
investors, not to exceed 30% of the aggregate purchase price paid by the
investors.
At the
date of issuance, the fair value of the Warrants was $510,000 and the fair value
of the Shares was $9.5 million. The fair value of the Warrants
and the Shares was determined by the use of the relative fair value method, in
which the $10.0 million gross proceeds was allocated based upon the fair values
of the Warrants, as determined by using the Black-Scholes Model, and the Shares,
as determined by the closing price of the common stock on the American Stock
Exchange on the date the transaction was closed.
The
Company paid the placement agent for the Shares and Warrants 6% of the gross
proceeds received by the Company from the offering ($600,000). In
addition to the placement agent fee, the Company paid $168,000 of other
transaction fees related to the offering.
The
proceeds were used to pay down the Company’s line of credit and for other
working capital purposes.
9.
|
Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock
|
On
February 28, 2006, the Company raised $3.9 million, net of associated fees of
$395,000, through the sale of 42,500 shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible
Preferred Stock and Warrants by means of a private placement to “accredited
investors”, as that term is used in rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Convertible Preferred Stock was convertible
at any time into a total of 2,401,133 shares of GSE common stock at a conversion
price of $1.77 per share. Each investor received a five-year warrant
to purchase GSE common stock equal to 20% of the shares they would receive from
the conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of
$1.77. In aggregate, the Company issued warrants to purchase a total
of 480,226 shares of GSE common stock. The Convertible Preferred
Stockholders were entitled to an 8% cumulative dividend, payable on a semiannual
basis every June 30 and December 30. In the first quarter 2007, the
Company paid dividends totaling $49,000 to the preferred
stockholders. At any time after March 1, 2007, the Company had the
right to convert the remaining outstanding Preferred Stock into shares of GSE
common stock when the average of the current stock price during the twenty
trading days immediately prior to the date of such conversion exceeded 200% of
the Series A Conversion Price. On March 7, 2007, the Company
sent notice to the holders of the remaining 20,000 outstanding shares of its
Preferred Stock that the average current stock price for the prior twenty
trading days had exceeded 200% of the Conversion Price, and that the Company was
converting the outstanding Preferred Stock into common stock. The
20,000 shares of Preferred Stock converted to 1,129,946 shares of GSE common
stock.
10.
|
Letters
of Credit and Performance Bonds
|
As of
March 31, 2008, the Company was contingently liable for seven standby letters of
credit totaling approximately $3.0 million. The letters of
credit represent performance bonds on six contracts and have been cash
collateralized.
In July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Interpretation,
or FIN, No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income
Taxes”. FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the Company’s financial statements. It
also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance
on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods and expanded disclosure with respect to uncertainty in income taxes. The
Company adopted the guidance of FIN No. 48 effective January 1, 2007.
The adoption of this accounting pronouncement did not have a material effect on
the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Furthermore, the Company is not aware of any tax positions for which it is
reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits would
significantly decrease or increase within the next twelve months.
The
Company files in the United States federal jurisdiction and in several state and
foreign jurisdictions. Because of the net operating loss carryforwards, the
Company is subject to U.S. federal and state income tax examinations from years
1997 forward and is subject to foreign tax examinations by tax authorities for
years 2002 and forward. Open tax years related to state and foreign
jurisdictions remain subject to examination but are not considered material to
our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
As of
March 31, 2008, there have been no material changes to the liability for
uncertain tax positions.
The
Company does not expect to pay U.S. federal income taxes in 2008, but does
expect to pay income taxes in Sweden. In addition, the Company will
pay foreign income tax withholding on several non-U.S. contracts. The
Company has a full valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets at March 31,
2008.
12.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
In
October 2005, the Company signed an “Assignment of Lease and Amendment to Lease”
that assigns and transfers to another tenant (the “assignee”) the Company’s
rights, title and interest in its Columbia, Maryland facility
lease. The assignee’s obligation to pay rent under the Lease began on
February 1, 2006. The Company remains fully liable for the payment of
all rent and for the performance of all obligations under the lease through the
scheduled expiration of the lease, May 31, 2008, should the assignee default on
their obligations. At March 31, 2008, the remaining rental payments under the
lease totaled approximately $115,000.
13.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure
requirements regarding fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require
any new fair value measurements. However, on February 12, 2008 the
FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
157 (“FSP FAS 157-2”). FSP FAS 157-2 delays the effective date
of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities until
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those
fiscal years. The implementation of SFAS No. 157 for
financial assets and financial liabilities, effective January 1, 2008, did not
have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements. The Company is currently assessing the impact of
SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities on
its consolidated financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Liabilities--- Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(“SFAS 159”), which permits entities to measure eligible items at fair
value. For items where the fair value election is made, the Company
will be required to report unrealized gains or losses in
earnings. Statement 159 was effective January 1, 2008. The Company
did not elect this fair value option; consequently, the adoption of
SFAS No. 159 did not have an impact on the Company’s condensed
consolidated financial statements.
In December, 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations
(“SFAS 141(R)”), which applies prospectively to business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not
apply it before that date. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and
requirements for how the acquirer: i) recognizes and measures in its
financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed
and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; ii) recognizes and
measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase; and iii) determines what information to disclose to
enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. The Company does not expect the adoption of
SFAS 141 (R) to have an effect on its results of operations and its
financial condition unless it enters into a business combination after
January 1, 2009.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 establishes
accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held
by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a
parent’s ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity
investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160 also establishes
disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the
interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. The
Company is required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 160 effective January 1,
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if
any, of the adoption of SFAS 160 on its consolidated financial
statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133”. SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about
derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures
to enable investors to better understand how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments and their effects on an entity's financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 161 on its consolidated
financial statements.
GSE
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM
10-Q
For
the Three Months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and
Financial Condition
GSE
Systems, Inc. (“GSE Systems”, “GSE” or the “Company”) is a world leader in
real-time high fidelity simulation. The Company provides simulation
and educational solutions and services to the nuclear and fossil electric
utility industry, and the chemical and petrochemical industries. In
addition, the Company provides plant monitoring and signal analysis monitoring
and optimization software primarily to the power industry. GSE is the parent
company of GSE Power Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation; GSE Power Systems,
AB, a Swedish corporation; GSE Engineering Systems (Beijing) Co. Ltd, a Chinese
limited liability company; and has a 10% minority interest in Emirates
Simulation Academy, LLC, a United Arab Emirates limited liability
company. The Company has only one reportable
segment.
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This
report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward looking
statements. Forward-looking statements are not statements of
historical facts, but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future
events and results. We use words such as “expects”, “intends”,
“believes”, “may”, “will” and “anticipates” to indicate forward-looking
statements. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements, including, but not limited to, those factors set forth under Item 1A
- Risk Factors of the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K and those other
risks and uncertainties detailed in the Company’s periodic reports and
registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We
caution that these risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in
a continually changing business environment, and new risk factors emerge from
time to time. We cannot predict these new risk factors, nor can we
assess the effect, if any, of the new risk factors on our business or the extent
to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ
from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements.
If any
one or more of these expectations and assumptions proves incorrect, actual
results will likely differ materially from those contemplated by the
forward-looking statements. Even if all of the foregoing assumptions and
expectations prove correct, actual results may still differ materially from
those expressed in the forward-looking statements as a result of factors we may
not anticipate or that may be beyond our control. While we cannot assess the
future impact that any of these differences could have on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows or the market price of
shares of our common stock, the differences could be significant. We do not
undertake to update any forward-looking statements made by us, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are
cautioned not to unduly rely on such forward-looking statements when evaluating
the information presented in this report.
General
Business Environment
The
nuclear power industry has been largely dormant for the last thirty years with
few opportunities to provide new full scope simulators. The Company’s
nuclear simulation business has concentrated mainly on providing services to the
installed base of nuclear simulators worldwide. These services are
primarily related to upgrading antiquated simulation software and hardware
systems, providing new and improved plant and system simulation models, and
modifying the simulator to reflect changes in the physical plant. However,
over the last several years, the nuclear power industry has experienced a
dramatic change, and most energy experts believe the industry is on the verge of
a “renaissance”, driven by the gap between the energy that the world is
projected to need versus the current capacity, the rising cost of oil, and
growing environmental concerns caused by fossil fuels. Government and industry
sources and trade journals report that up to 200 new nuclear plants will be
built over the next 20 years. In the U.S. alone, applications for
accelerated construction and operating licenses have been or are expected to be
submitted for 35 new nuclear plants. Each new plant will be required to
have a full scope simulator ready for operator training and certification about
two years prior to plant operation. In some cases where identical plants
share a common site, one simulator will serve both plants. Similar
nuclear plant construction programs are underway or planned in China, Russia,
Ukraine, Japan and Central Europe to meet growing energy demands. In
addition, most U.S. nuclear electric utilities have applied for license
extensions and/or power upgrades. These license extensions will lead to
significant upgrades to the physical equipment and control room technology which
will result in the need to modify or replace the existing plant control room
simulators. The Company, having what it believes is the largest installed base
of existing simulators, over 60% on a global basis, is well positioned to
capture a large portion of this business, although no assurance can be given
that it will be successful in doing so. The Company logged approximately
$8.7 million in nuclear simulation orders in the quarter ended March 31,
2008.
In 2005,
the Company completed an agreement with Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
(“Westinghouse”) to become their preferred vendor for the development of
simulators for their AP1000 reactor design. As a result of this agreement,
GSE is working closely with Westinghouse to cooperate in the development of
simulators for the AP1000 design and assist Westinghouse in the verification and
validation of the AP1000 Human Machine interface. The Company’s simulation
models have been used to help Westinghouse successfully complete several phases
of Human Machine Interface testing with customers, potential customers and U.S.
regulators. Westinghouse and its consortium partners received definitive
multi-million dollar contracts to provide four AP1000 nuclear power plants in
China. The four plants are to be constructed in pairs on China’s eastern
coast at Sanmen in Zhejiang province and Haiyang in Shandong
province. In September 2007, GSE received an initial contract from
Westinghouse to begin the first phase of work on the Sanmen simulator project in
China. In February 2008, the Company received the balance of its
multi-million dollar order for the Sanmen project. In April 2008 GSE
received a second contract from Westinghouse to begin work on the Haiyang
simulator project also in China. The Westinghouse
agreement is not exclusive and does not prevent the Company from working with
other nuclear vendors anywhere in the world.
The
Company’s fossil fueled power simulation business has been growing rapidly over
the past three years. The transition from obsolete analog control systems
to modern digital control systems and the new requirements for complex emission
control systems are contributing to the growth the Company is experiencing in
this business, coupled with the fact that GSE’s high-fidelity simulation models
can be used to validate control schemes and logics for new designs before the
control systems are deployed to the field. GSE builds the plant models
based upon design specifications supplied by its customers, and the models then
drive the actual digital control systems in the factory. This testing can
uncover numerous control system discrepancies. By correcting these
problems at the factory versus in the field, GSE’s customers can save millions
in reduced down time and reduced commissioning time.
GSE’s
process industries simulation business customers include primarily oil and gas
production facilities, oil refining plants, chemical plants and petro-chemical
facilities. The increased need for oil and oil based refined products
coupled with the rising price of oil is creating a global expansion in oil
production facilities. In addition, there is more focus on regular,
periodic and systematic training of plant operator personnel which may reduce
the risk of operator errors and potentially catastrophic environment disasters
and/or loss of life.
In July
2007, the Company announced that it had entered into a strategic partnership
with Sinopec Ningbo Engineering Company (“SNEC”). SNEC is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of SINOPEC and its 3,500 employees provide engineering,
manufacturing, construction and maintenance services to the oil, chemical and
petrochemical industries. This partnership will enable GSE and SNEC to
jointly explore, collaborate and build high fidelity, real-time simulators for
the oil, chemical and petrochemical industries. The first multi-million
dollar project under this strategic partnership that GSE has been authorized to
commence is at SINOPEC’s Fujian Refinery. Specifically, SNEC and GSE will
be responsible for the development of a simulator, including high fidelity
models, for the Fujian Refinery Integrated Gasification Combine Cycle
Plant.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth the results of operations for the periods presented
expressed in thousands of dollars and as a percentage of revenues:
(in
thousands)
|
|
Three
Months ended March, 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
|
|
Contract
revenue
|
|
$ |
7,083 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
7,845 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
5,218 |
|
|
|
73.7 |
% |
|
|
5,651 |
|
|
|
72.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
% |
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
% |
Depreciation
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
|
1,742 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
Other
expense, net
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
)% |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(293 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our estimates,
judgments and assumptions are continually evaluated based on available
information and experience. Because of the use of estimates inherent
in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those
estimates.
A summary of the Company’s significant
accounting policies as of December 31, 2007 is included in Note 2 to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007. Certain of our accounting policies require higher degrees of
judgment than others in their application. These include revenue
recognition on long-term contracts, capitalization of computer software
development costs, and deferred income tax valuation
allowances. These critical accounting policies and estimates are
discussed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations section in the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
Results
of Operations - Three Months ended March 31, 2008 versus Three Months ended
March 31, 2007
Contract
Revenue. Total contract revenue for the quarter ended March
31, 2008 totaled $7.1 million, which was 9.7% lower than the $7.8 million total
revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. The decrease mainly
reflects the substantial completion of the $16.9 million ESA contract in the
first quarter 2008. The Company recognized $1.2 million of revenue on
this contract in the first quarter 2008 versus $2.7 million in the first quarter
2007. The decrease in revenue from the ESA project was partially offset by a
$543,000 increase in the Company’s fossil fueled power simulation revenue, which
totaled $2.3 million in the first quarter 2008. The Company recorded
total orders of $11.1 million in the first quarter 2008 versus $6.3 million in
the first quarter 2007. At March 31, 2008, the Company’s backlog was
$28.7 million, of which only $53,000 related to the ESA contract.
Gross Profit. Gross profit
totaled $1.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 versus $2.2 million
for the same quarter in 2007. As a percentage of revenue, gross
profit decreased from 28.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 to 26.3%
for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in gross
margin reflects the lower revenue generated by the Company’s higher margined ESA
contract and the lower revenue base to recover the Company’s relatively fixed
overhead.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”)
expenses totaled $1.9 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2008, a 14.7%
increase from the $1.7 million for the same period in 2007. The increase
reflects the following spending variances:
¨
|
Business
development and marketing costs increased from $632,000 in the first
quarter 2007 to $797,000 in the first quarter of 2008. The
increase mainly reflects a $93,000 increase in bidding and proposal costs,
which are the costs of operations personnel in assisting with the
preparation of contract proposals, a $35,000 increase in business
development travel expenses, and the cost of attending the first quarter
2008 Society in Computer Simulation trade
show.
|
¨
|
The
Company’s general and administrative expenses totaled $1.1 million in the
first quarter 2008, which was 22.8% higher than the $894,000 incurred in
the first quarter 2007. The increase is mainly due to the
following:
|
o
|
The
Company’s audit and tax expense increased $69,000 in the first quarter
2008 as compared to the first quarter 2007. On June 30,
2007 the Company’s market capitalization exceeded $75 million, triggering
the audit requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in regards to the
Company’s internal controls over financial
reporting. Accordingly, the Company began accruing for the
increased audit fee in the second quarter 2007. In addition, in
the second quarter 2007, the Company hired an outside accounting firm to
provide tax consulting services.
|
o
|
In
the second quarter 2007, the Company leased a small office in Tarrytown,
New York. The costs of this office in the first quarter 2008
totaled approximately $29,000.
|
o
|
In
the first quarter 2008, the Company paid $20,000 to the American Stock
Exchange to register the 1 million shares of common stock that were added
to the Company’s 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan by shareholder approval at
the special shareholders meeting held in December
2007.
|
o
|
In
accordance with the GSE Board of Director compensation plan, the six
non-employee directors were awarded 10,000 stock options each in January
2008. The options were valued using the Black-Sholes method and
the value is being amortized over the three year vesting
period. The Company recognized $26,000 of expense in the first
quarter 2008.
|
¨
|
Gross
spending on software product development (“development”) totaled $237,000
in the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as compared to $300,000 in the same
period of 2007. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company
expensed $44,000 and capitalized $193,000 of its development spending
while in the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company expensed
$165,000 and capitalized $135,000 of its development
spending. The Company’s capitalized development expenditures in
2008 were mainly related to the customization of RELAP5-RT software (which
simulates transient fluid
dynamics, neutronics and heat transfer in nuclear power plants) to
run on the Company’s real-time executive software and the enhancement to
JCAD to add the capability to convert Autocad Control Logic Diagrams to
the Company’s JControl modeling tool. The Company
anticipates that its total gross development spending in 2008 will
approximate $900,000.
|
Depreciation. Depreciation
expense totaled $100,000 and $51,000 during the quarters ended March 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The higher 2008 depreciation expense is due
to the increase in 2007 capital spending which totaled $778,000, a 320% increase
as compared to the capital spending in 2006. Approximately 50%
of the capital spending in 2007 was for furniture and computer equipment for the
training centers that the Company establishing at Georgia Tech University and
Strathclyde University; the balance was for computers, printers, servers and
software.
Operating
Income. The Company had an operating loss of $174,000 (2.5% of
revenue) in the first quarter 2008, as compared with operating income of
$452,000 (5.8% of revenue) for the same period in 2007. The variances
were due to the factors outlined above.
Interest Expense,
Net. Net interest expense totaled $6,000 in the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 versus $154,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
In June
2007, using a portion of the proceeds from the Company’s June 2007 common stock
and warrant transaction, the Company paid off the outstanding balance of its
Laurus Master Fund Ltd. line of credit and did not borrow against the line of
credit in the first quarter 2008. On March 6, 2008, the Laurus
line of credit expired. The Company incurred interest expense of
$41,000 on borrowings from the Laurus line of credit in the first quarter
2007.
On March
28, 2008 the Company entered into two separate revolving line of credit
agreements for two-year revolving lines of credit with Bank of America (“BOA”)
in an aggregate amount of up to $5.0 million. One line of credit is
in the principal amount of up to $3.5 million and is guaranteed by the U.S.
Export-Import Bank. The other line of credit is in the principal
amount of up to $1.5 million. The Company did not borrow any funds
against either BOA line of credit after the closing.
The
deferred financing costs incurred in conjunction with the Laurus Master Fund
line of credit were amortized over the two-year period of the line of credit,
with the final amortization expense recorded in February
2008. Amortization expense totaled $89,000 in the first quarter 2008
versus $133,000 in the first quarter 2007. Amortization of the
deferred financing costs incurred in conjunction with the BOA lines of credit
will begin in April 2008.
Interest
income earned on short-term investments of the Company’s operating cash totaled
$34,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 versus none in
2007.
At March
31, 2008, the Company has approximately $3.0 million of cash in Certificates of
Deposit with BOA that are being used as collateral for seven performance
bonds. At March 31, 2007, the Company had approximately $2.2 million
of cash in Certificates of Deposit being used as collateral for three
performance bonds. The Company earned approximately $32,000 in
interest income on the Certificates of Deposit in the first quarter 2008 versus
$25,000 in interest income in the first quarter 2007.
In May
2007, the Company deposited $1.2 million into a restricted, interest-bearing
account at the Union National Bank in the United Arab Emirates as a partial
guarantee for the $11.8 million credit facility that UNB has extended to
ESA. GSE recorded approximately $17,000 interest income in the first
quarter 2008.
Other
miscellaneous interest expense, net totaled $5,000 in the three months ended
March 31, 2007.
Other Expense,
Net. At March 31, 2008, the Company had contracts for the sale
of approximately 36 million Japanese Yen and 281,000 Euro at fixed
rates. The contracts expire on various dates through February
2009. The Company had not designated the contracts as hedges and has
recorded the change in the estimated fair value of the contracts during the
first quarter 2008 of $10,000 in other expense, net.
At March
31, 2007, the Company had contracts for the sale of approximately 88 million
Japanese Yen and 182,000 Pounds Sterling at fixed rates. The contracts expired
on various dates through January 2008. The Company had not designated
the contracts as hedges and recorded the change in the estimated fair value of
the contracts during the first quarter 2007 of ($1,000) in other expense,
net.
In the
first quarter 2007, the Company incurred foreign currency transaction losses of
$43,000.
Provision for
Income Taxes. In July 2006, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Interpretation, or FIN,
No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN No. 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the Company’s financial
statements. It also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute
for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken
or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in
interim periods and expanded disclosure with respect to uncertainty in income
taxes. The Company adopted the guidance of FIN No. 48 effective
January 1, 2007. The adoption of this accounting pronouncement did not have
a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or
cash flows. Furthermore, the Company is not aware of any tax positions for which
it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits
would significantly decrease or increase within the next twelve
months.
The
Company files in the United States federal jurisdiction and in several state and
foreign jurisdictions. Because of the net operating loss carryforwards, the
Company is subject to U.S. federal and state income tax examinations from years
1997 and forward and is subject to foreign tax examinations by tax authorities
for years 2001 and forward. Open tax years related to state and
foreign jurisdictions remain subject to examination but are not considered
material to our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
As of
March 31, 2008, there have been no material changes to the liability for
uncertain tax positions.
The
Company does not expect to pay U.S. federal income taxes in 2008, but does
expect to pay income taxes in Sweden. In addition, the Company will
pay foreign income tax withholding on several non-U.S. contracts. The
Company has a full valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets at March 31,
2008.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of
March 31, 2008, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $4.1 million
compared to $8.2 million at December 31, 2007.
Cash used in operating
activities. Net cash used in operating activities for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 totaled $3.6 million. The most
significant change in the Company’s assets and liabilities in the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 was a $3.7 million increase in the Company’s contract
receivables. The Company’s trade receivables increased from $4.2
million at December 31, 2007 (including $1.0 million due from ESA) to $9.2
million at March 31, 2008 (including $3.7 million due from ESA) while the
Company’s unbilled receivables decreased by $1.3 million to $5.2 million at
March 31, 2008. At March 31, 2008, trade receivables
outstanding for more than 90 days totaled $2.1 million (including $1.0 million
from ESA) versus $2,000 at December 31, 2007. Despite the increase in
overdue receivables, the Company believes the entire balance will be received
and has not increased its bad debt reserve.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2007, net cash used in operating activities was
$90,000. Significant changes in the Company’s assets and liabilities
in the quarter ended March 31, 2007 included:
¨
|
A
$634,000 increase in contract receivables mainly due to an increase in
unbilled receivables.
|
¨
|
A
$608,000 increase in accounts payable, accrued compensation and accrued
expense. The Company had several contracts that had significant
material and subcontractor cost components. The Company’s
accounts payable balance increased due to the receipt of invoices from the
related vendors.
|
¨
|
A
$425,000 decrease in billings in excess of revenue
earned.
|
Cash used in investing activities.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, net cash used in investing
activities totaled $560,000. Capital expenditures totaled $297,000,
capitalized software development costs totaled $193,000, and the Company
increased its investment in ESA by $47,000. Cash used as collateral
for stand-by letters of credit increased by $23,000. The Company anticipates
that its total capital expenditures in 2008 will approximate
$550,000.
Net cash
used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 totaled
$215,000. Capital expenditures totaled $70,000, capitalized software
development costs totaled $135,000 and the Company increased its investment in
ESA by $17,000. A $7,000 cash collateralized stand-by letter of
credit expired in the first quarter 2007 and the cash collateral was
released.
Cash provided by financing
activities. The Company received $77,000 from the
issuance of common stock in the three months ended March 31, 2008.
In the
three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company generated $196,000 from financing
activities. The Company paid down the borrowings under its line of
credit by $520,000 and generated $697,000 from the exercise of warrants and
employee stock options. The Company recognized a tax benefit of
$19,000 related to employee stock option exercises.
Based on
the Company’s forecasted expenditures and cash flow, the Company believes that
it will generate sufficient cash through its normal operations and through the
utilization of its current credit facility to meet its liquidity and working
capital needs in 2008. However, notwithstanding the foregoing, the
Company may be required to look for additional capital to fund its operations if
the Company is unable to operate profitably and generate sufficient cash from
operations. There can be no assurance that the Company would be
successful in raising such additional funds.
Credit
Facilities
On March
28, 2008, the Company entered into two separate revolving line of credit
agreements for two-year revolving lines of credit with Bank of American, N.A.
(“BOA”), in an aggregate amount of up to $5.0 million. The Company
and its subsidiary, GSE Power Systems, Inc., are jointly and severally liable as
co-borrowers. The credit facilities will enable the Company to borrow
funds to support working capital needs and standby letters of
credit. The first line of credit in the principal amount of up to
$3.5 million will enable the Company to borrow funds up to 90% of eligible
foreign accounts receivable, plus 75% of eligible unbilled foreign receivables
and 100% of the cash collateral pledged to BOA on outstanding letters of credit.
This line of credit will be 90% guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the
United States. The interest rate on this line of credit will be based
on the daily LIBOR rate plus 150 basis points, with interest only payments due
monthly. The second line of credit in the principal amount of up to
$1.5 million will enable the Company to borrow funds up to 80% of domestic
accounts receivable and 30% of domestic unbilled receivables. The
interest rate on this line of credit will be based on the daily LIBOR rate plus
225 basis points, with interest only payments due monthly. The
credit facilities will require the Company to comply with certain financial
ratios and preclude the Company from paying dividends and making acquisitions
beyond certain limits without the bank’s consent. At March 31, 2008,
the Company’s available borrowing base under the two lines of credit was $5.0
million, none of which had been utilized.
Common
Stock and Warrant Transaction
On June
22, 2007, the Company raised $9.2 million, net of associated fees of $768,000,
through the sale of 1,666,667 shares (the “Shares”) of its common stock, $.01
par value per share, by means of a private placement to selected institutional
investors. Each investor received a five-year warrant to purchase GSE
common stock (the “Warrant Shares”) equal to 10% of the shares of common stock
that they had purchased at an exercise price of $6.00 per share (the
“Warrants”). In aggregate, the Company issued Warrants to purchase a
total of 166,667 shares of GSE common stock.
The
Company filed its registration statement on Form S-3 (the “Registration
Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on
July 16, 2007 covering the offer and sale, from time to time, of the Shares, the
Warrant Shares and shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants
that may be issued as liquidated damages under the terms of a certain
registration rights agreement entered into between the Company and the investors
(the “Registration Rights Agreement”) in connection with the private
placement. The Registration Statement became effective on August 8,
2007 and, pursuant to the provisions of the Registration Rights Agreement, the
Company is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to, after the date
on which the Registration Statement becomes effective, cause the Registration
Statement to remain continuously effective as to all Shares and Warrant Shares,
other than for an aggregate of more than 30 consecutive trading days or for more
than an aggregate of 60 trading days in any 12-month period. In the event of a
default of the foregoing obligation, the Company will be required to issue to
the investors, as liquidated damages, on the date the foregoing default occurs
and each monthly anniversary thereafter, a number of warrants (on the same terms
as the Warrants) equal to 2% of the number of Shares then held by such investor,
not to exceed 10% of the total number of Shares then held by such investor, and
thereafter cash, in an amount equal to 2% of the aggregate purchase price paid
by the investors, not to exceed 30% of the aggregate purchase price paid by the
investors.
At the
date of issuance, the fair value of the Warrants was $510,000 and the fair value
of the Shares was $9.5 million. The fair value of the Warrants and
the Shares was determined by the use of the relative fair value method, in which
the $10.0 million gross proceeds was allocated based upon the fair values of the
Warrants, as determined by using the Black-Scholes Model, and the Shares, as
determined by the closing price of the common stock on the American Stock
Exchange on the date the transaction was closed.
The
Company paid the placement agent a fee in the amount of 6% of the gross proceeds
received by the Company from the offering ($600,000). In addition to
the placement agent fee, the Company paid $168,000 of other transaction fees
related to the offering.
The
proceeds were used to pay down the Company’s line of credit and for other
working capital purposes.
Series
A Cumulative Preferred Stock
On
February 28, 2006, the Company raised $3.9 million, net of associated fees of
$395,000, through the sale of 42,500 shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible
Preferred Stock and Warrants by means of a private placement to “accredited
investors”, as that term is used in rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Convertible Preferred Stock was convertible
at any time into a total of 2,401,133 shares of GSE common stock at a conversion
price of $1.77 per share. Each investor received a five-year warrant
to purchase GSE common stock equal to 20% of the shares they would receive from
the conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of
$1.77. In aggregate, the Company issued warrants to purchase a total
of 480,226 shares of GSE common stock. The Convertible Preferred
Stockholders were entitled to an 8% cumulative dividend, payable on a semiannual
basis every June 30 and December 30. In the first quarter 2007, the
Company paid dividends totaling $49,000 to the preferred
stockholders. At any time after March 1, 2007, the Company had the
right to convert the Preferred Stock into shares of GSE common stock when the
average of the current stock price during the twenty trading days immediately
prior to the date of such conversion exceeded 200% of the Series A Conversion
Price. Prior to March 7, 2007, the holders of 22,500 shares of
Preferred Stock had already elected to convert their Preferred Stock into a
total of 1,271,187 shares of Common Stock; 8,580 shares of Preferred Stock were
converted in 2006 and 13,920 shares of preferred Stock in 2007. On
March 7, 2007, the Company sent notice to the holders of the remaining 20,000
outstanding shares of its Preferred Stock that the average current stock price
for the prior twenty trading days had exceeded 200% of the Conversion Price, and
that the Company was converting the outstanding Preferred Stock into common
stock. The 20,000 shares of Preferred Stock converted to 1,129,946
shares of GSE common stock. In 2006, the Preferred Stockholders
exercised 28,248 warrants and an additional 11,300 warrants were exercised in
the first quarter 2007.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market
Risk
The
Company’s market risk is principally confined to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. The Company’s exposure to foreign exchange rate
fluctuations arises in part from inter-company accounts in which costs incurred
in one entity are charged to other entities in different foreign
jurisdictions. The Company is also exposed to foreign exchange rate
fluctuations as the financial results of all foreign subsidiaries are translated
into U.S. dollars in consolidation. As exchange rates vary, those
results when translated may vary from expectations and adversely impact overall
expected profitability.
The
Company utilizes forward foreign currency financial instruments to manage market
risks associated with the fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. It is
the Company's policy to use derivative financial instruments to protect against
market risk arising in the normal course of business. The criteria the Company
uses for designating an instrument as a hedge include the instrument's
effectiveness in risk reduction and one-to-one matching of derivative
instruments to underlying transactions. The Company monitors
its foreign currency exposures to maximize the overall effectiveness of its
foreign currency hedge positions. The principal currencies hedged are the
Japanese yen, the British pound sterling and the Euro. The Company's
objectives for holding derivatives are to minimize the risks using the most
effective methods to reduce the impact of these exposures. The Company minimizes
credit exposure by limiting counterparties to nationally recognized financial
institutions.
At March
31, 2008, the Company had contracts for the sale of approximately 36 million
Japanese Yen and 281,000 Euro at fixed rates. The contracts expire on
various dates through February 2009. The Company had not designated
the contracts as hedges and has recorded the change in the estimated fair value
of the contracts during the first quarter 2008 of $10,000 in other expense,
net.
At
March 31, 2007, the Company had contracts for sale of approximately 88 million
Japanese Yen and 182,000 Pounds Sterling at fixed rates. The contracts expire on
various dates through January 2008. The Company had not designated
the contracts as hedges and has recorded the change in the estimated fair value
of the contracts during the first quarter 2007 of ($1,000) in other expense,
net.
The
Company is also subject to market risk related to the interest rate on its
existing lines of credit. However, during the first quarter 2008, the
Company had no outstanding borrowings from its lines of credit.
Item
4.
Controls and Procedures
(a)
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company
maintains adequate internal disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as amended) as of the end of the period covered by
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange
Act that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by it
in its reports filed or submitted pursuant to the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Commission’s rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by
the Company in its Exchange Act reports is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), who is its
principal executive officer, and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), who is its
principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
The
Company’s CEO and CFO are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over the Company’s financial reporting. They have
reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 as of March 31, 2008 in
order to ensure the reporting of material information required to be included in
the Company’s periodic filings with the Commission comply with the Commission’s
requirements for certification of this Form 10-Q. Based on that
evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO have concluded that as of March 31, 2008
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the
reasonable assurance level to satisfy the objectives for which they were
intended and that the information required to be disclosed is (a) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Commission’s rules and forms and (b) compiled and communicated to our management
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b)
Changes in internal control. There were no changes in the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably
likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Limitation
of Effectiveness of Controls
It should
be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the
system will be met. The design of any control system is based, in
part, upon the benefits of the control system relative to its
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been
detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that
judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that controls can be
circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people or by management override of control. In addition, over time,
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In
addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of
inherent limitation in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. The Company’s controls
and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance of
achieving their objectives.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
In
accordance with its conduct in the ordinary course of business, certain actions
and proceedings are pending to which the Company is a party. In the
opinion of management, the aggregate liabilities, if any, arising from such
actions are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial
condition of the Company.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
The
Company has no material changes to the disclosure on this matter made in its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007.
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item
3. Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
None
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item
5. Other
Information
None
Item
6. Exhibits
|
31.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Date: May
12,
2008 GSE
SYSTEMS, INC.
/S/ JOHN V.
MORAN
John V.
Moran
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
/S/ JEFFERY G.
HOUGH
Jeffery
G. Hough
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
27