424B5
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5)
Registration No. 333-130549
A filing fee of $125,103.00, calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r), has
been transmitted to the SEC in connection with the securities offered by means
of this prospectus supplement. This fee includes the common stock issuable upon
the exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option.
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(To Prospectus dated December 21, 2005)
20,855,057 Shares
NRG Energy, Inc.
Common Stock
We are offering 20,855,057 shares of our common stock.
The closing of this offering is not conditioned on the
consummation of our acquisition of Texas Genco LLC described
elsewhere in this prospectus supplement. Concurrently with this
offering, we are offering senior notes and shares of our
mandatory convertible preferred stock. This offering is not
conditioned on the consummation of these concurrent
offerings.
Our common stock is listed on The New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol NRG. The last reported sale price
of our common stock on The New York Stock Exchange on
January 25, 2006, was $49.25 per share.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors on
page S-12 of this
prospectus supplement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Public offering price
|
|
$ |
48.7500 |
|
|
$ |
1,016,684,029 |
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$ |
1.4625 |
|
|
$ |
30,500,521 |
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to NRG Energy, Inc.
|
|
$ |
47.2875 |
|
|
$ |
986,183,508 |
|
The underwriters may also purchase up to an additional
3,128,259 shares from us at the public offering price, less the
underwriting discount, within 30 days from the date of this
prospectus supplement to cover any overallotments. If the
overallotment option is exercised in full, we will receive
additional proceeds, before expenses, of $147,927,547.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the
prospectus to which it relates is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The shares will be taken for delivery on or about
January 31, 2006.
Joint Book-Running Managers
LEHMAN BROTHERS
|
|
|
BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC |
The date of this prospectus supplement is January 26,
2006.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Prospectus Supplement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
|
|
iii |
|
|
|
|
iv |
|
|
|
|
S-1 |
|
|
|
|
S-12 |
|
|
|
|
S-30 |
|
|
|
|
S-33 |
|
|
|
|
S-35 |
|
|
|
|
S-37 |
|
|
|
|
S-38 |
|
|
|
|
S-41 |
|
|
|
|
S-44 |
|
|
|
|
S-49 |
|
|
|
|
S-97 |
|
|
|
|
S-103 |
|
|
|
|
S-104 |
|
|
|
|
S-108 |
|
|
|
|
S-114 |
|
|
|
|
S-117 |
|
|
|
|
S-120 |
|
Prospectus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
|
|
iii |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
i
About This Prospectus Supplement
This document consists of two parts. The first part is this
prospectus supplement, which describes the specific terms of
this offering. The second part is the accompanying prospectus,
which describes more general information, some of which may not
apply to this offering. You should read both this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus, together with
additional information described below under the headings
Where You Can Find More Information and
Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference.
If the description of the offering varies between this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, you
should rely on the information in this prospectus supplement.
Any statement made in this prospectus supplement or in a
document incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference
in this prospectus supplement will be deemed to be modified or
superseded for purposes of this prospectus supplement to the
extent that a statement contained in this prospectus supplement
or in any other subsequently filed document that is also
incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference in this
prospectus supplement modifies or supersedes that statement. Any
statement so modified or superseded will not be deemed, except
as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this
prospectus supplement. See Incorporation of Certain
Documents By Reference.
Where You Can Find More Information
NRG files annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy
statements and other information with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or the SEC. You can inspect and copy these
reports, proxy statements and other information at the Public
Reference Room of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further
information on the operation of the public reference room.
NRGs SEC filings will also be available to you on the
SECs website at http://www.sec.gov and through the New
York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, NY 10005, on
which NRGs common stock is listed.
This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus,
which forms a part of the registration statement, do not contain
all the information that is included in the registration
statement. You will find additional information about us in the
registration statement. Any statements made in this prospectus
supplement or the accompanying prospectus concerning the
provisions of legal documents are not necessarily complete and
you should read the documents that are filed as exhibits to the
registration statement or otherwise filed with the SEC for a
more complete understanding of the document or matter.
Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference
The SEC allows the incorporation by reference of the
information filed by NRG with the SEC into this prospectus
supplement, which means that important information can be
disclosed to you by referring you to those documents and those
documents will be considered part of this prospectus supplement.
Information that NRG files later with the SEC will automatically
update and supersede the previously filed information. The
documents listed below and any future filings NRG makes with the
SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, are incorporated by reference herein, after the date of
this prospectus supplement but before the end of any offering
made under this prospectus supplement:
|
|
|
|
1. |
NRGs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 filed on March 30, 2005 as amended
by the current report on Form 8-K filed on
December 20, 2005. |
|
|
2. |
NRGs Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed
on April 12, 2005. |
|
|
3. |
NRGs quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters
ended March 31, 2005 (filed on May 10, 2005),
June 30, 2005 (filed on August 9, 2005) and
September 30, 2005 (filed on November 7, 2005). |
|
|
4. |
NRGs current reports on Form 8-K filed on
February 24, 2005, Form 8-K filed on March 3,
2005, two Forms 8-K filed on March 30, 2005 (which do
not include information deemed furnished),
Form 8-K filed on May 24, 2005, Form 8-K/ A filed on
May 24, 2005, Form 8-K/ A filed on May 25, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2005, Form 8-K/ A filed on
June 15, 2005, Form 8-K filed on |
ii
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2005, Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2005, Form 8-K filed on
August 3, 2005, Form 8-K filed on August 9, 2005
(which does not include information deemed
furnished), Form 8-K filed on August 11,
2005, Form 8-K filed on September 1, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on September 7, 2005 (which does not
include information deemed furnished), Form 8-K
filed on October 3, 2005, Form 8-K filed on
October 12, 2005, Form 8-K filed on November 7,
2005 (which does not include information deemed
furnished), Form 8-K filed on December 20,
2005, Form 8-K
filed on December 21, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on
December 28, 2005 (which does not include information
deemed furnished),
Form 8-K filed on
January 4, 2006, Form 8-K filed on January 5,
2006, Form 8-K/A
filed on January 5, 2006,
Form 8-K filed on
January 13, 2006,
Form 8-K filed on
January 23, 2006,
Form 8-K/A filed
on January 23, 2006 and Form 8-K/A filed on
January 26, 2006. |
|
|
5. |
The description of NRGs common stock contained in the
Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated March 22,
2004 filed with the SEC to register such securities under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including any
amendment or report filed for the purpose of updating such
description. |
If you make a request for such information in writing or by
telephone, NRG will provide you, without charge, a copy of any
or all of the information incorporated by reference in this
prospectus. Any such request should be directed to:
NRG Energy, Inc.
211 Carnegie Center
Princeton, New Jersey 08540
(609) 524-4500
Attention: General Counsel
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus supplement, the attached prospectus, the documents
incorporated by reference and any written communication from us
or the underwriters specifying the final terms of the offering.
NRG has not, and the underwriters have not, authorized any other
person to provide you with different information. If anyone
provides you with different or inconsistent information, you
should not rely on it. NRG is not, and the underwriters are not,
making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction
where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that
the information appearing in this prospectus supplement is
accurate as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus
supplement only. NRGs business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects may have changed since that
date.
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This prospectus supplement contains, and the documents
incorporated by reference herein may contain, forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements are
subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that
include, but are not limited to, expected earnings and cash
flows, future growth and financial performance and the expected
benefits and other benefits of the acquisition of Texas Genco
LLC described herein and typically can be identified by the use
of words such as will, expect,
estimate, anticipate,
forecast, plan, believe and
similar terms. Although we believe that our expectations are
reasonable, we can give no assurance that these expectations
will prove to have been correct, and actual results may vary
materially. Factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those contemplated above include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
Risks and uncertainties related to the capital markets
generally, including increases in interest rates and the
availability of financing for the acquisition of Texas Genco LLC; |
|
|
|
NRGs indebtedness and the additional indebtedness that it
will incur in connection with the acquisition of Texas Genco LLC; |
iii
|
|
|
|
|
NRGs ability to successfully complete the acquisition of
Texas Genco LLC, regulatory or other limitations that may be
imposed as a result of the acquisition of Texas Genco LLC, and
the success of the business following the acquisition of Texas
Genco LLC; |
|
|
|
General economic conditions, changes in the wholesale power
markets and fluctuations in the cost of fuel or other raw
materials; |
|
|
|
Hazards customary to the power production industry and power
generation operations such as fuel and electricity price
volatility, unusual weather conditions, catastrophic
weather-related or other damage to facilities, unscheduled
generation outages, maintenance or repairs, unanticipated
changes to fossil fuel supply costs or availability due to
higher demand, shortages, transportation problems or other
developments, environmental incidents, or electric transmission
or gas pipeline system constraints and the possibility that we
may not have adequate insurance to cover losses as a result of
such hazards; |
|
|
|
NRGs potential inability to enter into contracts to sell
power and procure fuel on terms and prices acceptable to it; |
|
|
|
The liquidity and competitiveness of wholesale markets for
energy commodities; |
|
|
|
Changes in government regulation, including possible changes of
market rules, market structures and design, rates, tariffs,
environmental laws and regulations and regulatory compliance
requirements; |
|
|
|
Price mitigation strategies and other market structures or
designs employed by independent system operators, or ISOs, or
regional transmission organizations, or RTOs, that result in a
failure to adequately compensate our generation units for all of
their costs; |
|
|
|
NRGs ability to realize its significant deferred tax
assets, including loss carry forwards; |
|
|
|
The effectiveness of NRGs risk management policies and
procedures, and the ability of NRGs counterparties to
satisfy their financial commitments; |
|
|
|
Counterparties collateral demands and other factors
affecting NRGs liquidity position and financial condition; |
|
|
|
NRGs ability to operate its businesses efficiently, manage
capital expenditures and costs tightly (including general and
administrative expenses), and generate earnings and cash flow
from its asset-based businesses in relation to its debt and
other obligations; and |
|
|
|
Significant operating and financial restrictions which may be
placed on NRG as a result of the financing transactions
described elsewhere in this prospectus supplement. |
Market and Industry Data
Certain market and industry data included or incorporated by
reference in this prospectus supplement and in the accompanying
prospectus has been obtained from third party sources that we
believe to be reliable. We have not independently verified such
third party information and cannot assure you of its accuracy or
completeness. While we are not aware of any misstatements
regarding any market, industry or similar data presented herein,
such data involves risks and uncertainties and is subject to
change based on various factors, including those discussed under
the headings Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and Risk Factors in this prospectus
supplement.
iv
SUMMARY
This summary may not contain all the information that may be
important to you. You should read this entire prospectus
supplement, the accompanying prospectus and those documents
incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement and
the accompanying prospectus, including the risk factors and the
financial data and related notes, before making an investment
decision.
In this prospectus supplement, unless otherwise indicated
herein or the context otherwise indicates:
|
|
|
|
|
the term NRG refers to NRG Energy, Inc., together
with its consolidated subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
the term Texas Genco refers to Texas Genco LLC,
together with its consolidated subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
the term Acquisition refers to the purchase by
NRG of all the outstanding equity interests of Texas Genco,
pursuant to the acquisition agreement, dated as of
September 30, 2005, between NRG, Texas Genco and the
sellers named therein; |
|
|
|
the term Financing Transactions refers to this
offering, the concurrent offering by NRG of its mandatory
convertible preferred stock and its fixed rate senior notes due
2014, or the 2014 fixed rate notes, and fixed rate senior notes
due 2016, or the 2016 fixed rate notes, together, the senior
notes, and the application of the net proceeds therefrom, and
the execution of NRGs new senior secured credit facility
and the application of the initial borrowings thereunder, each
as described elsewhere in this prospectus supplement; |
|
|
|
the term Transactions refers to the Acquisition,
the Financing Transactions, the pending sale of Audrain
Generating LLC, the pending acquisition of 50% interest in WCP
(Generation) Holdings LLC and the pending sale of our 50%
ownership interest in Rocky Road Power LLC, or Rocky Road; |
|
|
|
the terms we, our, us,
the combined company and the Company
refer to NRG and Texas Genco on a combined basis, together with
their consolidated subsidiaries, after giving pro forma effect
to the completion of the Acquisition and the Financing
Transactions; |
|
|
|
the terms MW and MWh refer to
megawatts and megawatt-hours. The megawatt figures provided
represent nominal summer net megawatt capacity of power
generated as adjusted for the combined companys ownership
position excluding capacity from inactive/mothballed units as of
September 30, 2005. NRG has previously shown gross MWs when
presenting its operations. Capacity is tested following standard
industry practices. The combined companys numbers denote
saleable MWs net of internal/parasitic load. The MW and MWh
figures and other operational figures related to the combined
company only give pro forma effect to the Acquisition and the
Financing Transactions; and |
|
|
|
the term expected annual baseload generation
refers to the net baseload capacity limited by economic factors
(relationship between cost of generation and market price) and
reliability factors (scheduled and unplanned outages). |
Our Business
We are a leading wholesale power generation company with a
significant presence in many of the major competitive power
markets in the United States. We are primarily engaged in the
ownership and operation of power generation facilities,
purchasing fuel and transportation services to support our power
plant operations, and the marketing of energy, capacity and
related products in the competitive markets in which we operate.
As of September 30, 2005, the combined company would have
had a total global portfolio of 235 operating generation units
at 62 power generation plants, with an aggregate generation
capacity of approximately 25,041 MW. Within the United States,
the combined company will have one of the largest and most
diversified power generation portfolios with approximately
23,124 MW of generation capacity in 213 generating units at 54
plants as of September 30, 2005. These power generation
facilities are primarily located in our core regions in the
Electric Reliability Council of Texas, or ERCOT, market
(approximately 11,119 MW), and in the Northeast (approximately
7,099 MW), South Central (approximately 2,395 MW) and Western
(approximately 1,044 MW) regions of the United States. Our
facilities consist primarily of baseload, intermediate and
peaking power generation facilities, which we refer to as the
merit order, and also include thermal energy production and
energy
S-1
resource recovery plants. The sale of capacity and power from
baseload generation facilities accounts for the majority of our
revenues and provides a stable source of cash flow. In addition,
our diverse generation portfolio provides us with opportunities
to capture additional revenues by selling power into our core
regions during periods of peak demand, offering capacity or
similar products to retail electric providers and others, and
providing ancillary services to support system reliability.
The Texas Genco Acquisition
On September 30, 2005, NRG entered into an acquisition
agreement, or the Acquisition Agreement, with Texas Genco and
each of the direct and indirect owners of equity interests in
Texas Genco, or the Sellers. Pursuant to the Acquisition
Agreement, NRG agreed to purchase all of the outstanding equity
interests in Texas Genco for a total pro forma purchase price of
approximately $6.121 billion that includes the assumption
of approximately $2.7 billion of indebtedness. The purchase
price is subject to adjustment, and includes an equity component
valued at approximately $2.0 billion based on a price per
share of $45.37 of NRGs common stock issued to the
Sellers, and an average price per share of $40.73 for the
consideration with a fair value of $368 million, or the
Other Consideration. As a result of the Acquisition, Texas Genco
will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of NRG. Each of NRGs
and the Sellers obligation to consummate the Acquisition
is subject to certain customary conditions, including the
receipt of required regulatory consents and approvals. See
The Acquisition for a discussion of the Acquisition.
The closing of this offering is not conditioned on the
consummation of the Acquisition. While we expect that the
Acquisition will be consummated in or about the first week of
February 2006, no assurance can be given that the Acquisition
will be completed in accordance with the anticipated timing or
at all. See Risk Factors Risks Related to the
Offering There can be no assurance that the Acquisition
will be consummated in accordance with the anticipated timing or
at all, and the closing of this offering is not conditioned on
the consummation of the Acquisition. If the Acquisition is not
consummated, NRGs common stock will not reflect any actual
or anticipated interest in Texas Genco, and if the Acquisition
is delayed, this interest will not be reflected during the
period of delay.
Our Strategy
Our strategy is to increase the value of, and extract value
from, our generation assets while using that asset base as a
platform for enhanced financial performance which can be
sustained and expanded upon in years to come. We plan to
maintain and enhance our position as a leading wholesale power
generation company in the United States in a cost effective and
risk mitigating manner in order to serve the bulk power
requirements of our customer base and other entities who offer
load, or otherwise consume wholesale electricity products and
services in bulk. Our strategy includes the following elements:
Increase value from our existing assets. Following
the Acquisition, we believe that we will have a highly
diversified portfolio of power generation assets in terms of
region, fuel type and dispatch levels. We will continue to focus
on extracting value from our portfolio by improving plant
performance, reducing costs and harnessing our advantages of
scale in the procurement of fuels: a strategy that we have
branded FORNRG, or Focus on ROIC@NRG.
Pursue intrinsic growth opportunities at existing sites in
our core regions. We believe that we are favorably
positioned to pursue growth opportunities through expansion of
our existing generating capacity. We intend to invest in our
existing assets through plant improvements, repowering and
brownfield development to meet anticipated regional requirements
for new capacity. We expect that these efforts will provide more
efficient energy, lower our delivered cost, expand our
electricity production capability and improve our ability to
dispatch economically across the merit order.
Maintain financial strength and flexibility. We
remain focused on increasing cash flow and maintaining liquidity
and balance sheet strength in order to ensure continued access
to capital for growth; enhancing risk-adjusted returns; and
providing flexibility in executing our business strategy. We
intend to continue our focus on maintaining operational and
financial controls designed to ensure that our financial
position remains strong.
S-2
Reduce the volatility of our cash flows through
asset-based commodity hedging activities. We will
continue to execute asset-based risk management, hedging,
marketing and trading strategies within well-defined risk and
liquidity guidelines in order to manage the value of our
physical and contractual assets. Our marketing and hedging
philosophy is centered on generating stable returns from our
portfolio of power generation assets while preserving the
ability to capitalize on strong spot market conditions and to
capture the extrinsic value of our portfolio. We believe that we
can successfully execute this strategy by leveraging our
expertise in marketing power and ancillary services, our
knowledge of markets, our flexible financial structure and our
diverse portfolio of power generation assets.
Participate in continued industry consolidation.
We will continue to pursue selective acquisitions, joint
ventures and divestitures to enhance our asset mix and
competitive position in our core regions to meet the fuel and
dispatch requirements in these regions. We intend to concentrate
on acquisition and joint venture opportunities that present
attractive risk-adjusted returns. We will also opportunistically
pursue other strategic transactions, including mergers,
acquisitions or divestitures during the consolidation of the
power generation industry in the United States.
Our Competitive Strengths
Scale and diversity of assets. The combined
company will have one of the largest and most diversified power
generation portfolios in the United States with approximately
23,124 MW of generation capacity in 213 generating units at 54
plants as of September 30, 2005. Our power generation
assets will be diversified by fuel type, dispatch level and
region, which will help mitigate the risks associated with fuel
price volatility and market demand cycles. The combined
companys U.S. baseload facilities, which will consist of
approximately 8,558 MW of generation capacity measured as of
September 30, 2005, will provide the combined company with
a significant source of stable cash flow, while the combined
companys intermediate and peaking facilities, with
approximately 14,566 MW of generation capacity as of
September 30, 2005, will provide the combined company with
opportunities to capture the significant upside potential that
can arise from time to time during periods of high demand. In
addition, approximately 10% of the combined companys
domestic generation facilities will have dual or multiple fuel
capability, which will allow most of these plants to dispatch
with the lowest cost fuel option.
Reliability of future cash flows. We have sold
forward a significant amount of our expected baseload generation
capacity for 2006 and 2007. As of September 30, 2005 the
combined company would have sold forward 68% of its baseload
generation in the Texas (ERCOT) market for 2006 through
2009. As of the same date, the combined company would have sold
approximately 83% of its expected annual baseload generation in
the Southeastern Electric Reliability Council/ Entergy, or
SERC Entergy, market for 2006 through 2009, and
approximately 70% of its expected annual baseload generation in
the Northeast region for 2006. In addition, as of
September 30, 2005, the combined company would have
purchased forward under fixed price contracts (with
contractually-specified price escalators) to provide fuel for
approximately 81% of its expected baseload coal generation
output from 2006 to 2009.
Favorable market dynamics for baseload power
plants. As of September 30, 2005, approximately 38%
of the combined companys domestic generation capacity
would have been fueled by coal or nuclear fuel. In many of the
competitive markets where we operate, the price of power
typically is set by the marginal costs of natural gas-fired and
oil-fired power plants that currently have substantially higher
variable costs than our solid fuel baseload power plants. For
example, in the ERCOT market, a 2004 report by Henwood Energy
Services, Inc., or Henwood, found that natural gas-fired power
plants set the market price of power more than 90% of the time.
As a result of our lower marginal cost for baseload coal and
nuclear generation assets, we expect such assets to generate
power nearly 100% of the time they are available.
Locational advantages. Many of our generation
assets are located within densely populated areas that are
characterized by significant constraints on the transmission of
power from generators outside the region. Consequently, these
assets are able to benefit from the higher prices that prevail
for energy in these markets during periods of transmission
constraints. The combined company will have generation assets
located within New York City, southwestern Connecticut, Houston
and the Los Angeles and San Diego load basins, all areas
S-3
with constraints on the transmission of electricity. This allows
us to capture additional revenues through offering capacity to
retail electric providers and others, selling power at
prevailing market prices during periods of peak demand and
providing ancillary services in support of system reliability.
Summary of Risk Factors
We are subject to a variety of risks related to our competitive
position and business strategies. Some of the more significant
challenges and risks include those associated with the operation
of our power generation plants, volatility in power prices and
fuel costs, our leveraged capital structure and extensive
governmental regulation. See Risk Factors beginning
on page S-12 for a discussion of the factors you should consider
before investing in our securities.
The Financing Transactions
The offering of common stock forms part of a larger financing
plan for the Acquisition described elsewhere in this prospectus
supplement. See The Acquisition. Concurrently with
this offering, NRG intends to offer, by means of separate
prospectus supplements (i) $500 million of its mandatory
convertible preferred stock and (ii) $3.6 billion of its
senior notes, or the New Senior Notes. See Description of
Capital Stock Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock
and Description of Certain IndebtednessNew Senior
Notes. This offering, the mandatory convertible preferred
stock offering and the New Senior Notes offering are expected to
be consummated at or prior to the completion of the Acquisition.
The closing of this offering will not necessarily be
contemporaneous with the closing of the New Senior Notes
offering and/or the closing of the mandatory convertible
preferred stock offering. The net proceeds of the offering of
the New Senior Notes will be placed into an escrow account held
by the escrow agent until the consummation of the Acquisition.
In addition, NRG intends to enter into a new senior secured
credit facility at or prior to the closing of the Acquisition
that will replace its existing senior secured credit facility.
See Description of Certain Indebtedness New Senior
Secured Credit Facility. Concurrently with this offering,
NRG is conducting a cash tender offer and consent solicitation
with respect to (i) all of its outstanding 8% Second
Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2013, or the Second Priority
Notes, and (ii) all of Texas Gencos outstanding
6.875% Senior Notes due 2014, or the Unsecured Senior Notes. The
completion of the Acquisition is not conditioned on the
completion of the tender offer or receipt of the consents for
either the Second Priority Notes or Texas Gencos Unsecured
Senior Notes. The completion of the tender offer for the Second
Priority Notes and Texas Gencos Unsecured Senior Notes is
conditioned on the completion of the Acquisition. However, NRG
can waive this condition in the case of the tender offer and
consent solicitation for the Second Priority Notes.
NRG intends to use initial borrowings under its new senior
secured credit facility, together with the net proceeds from
this offering, the offerings of mandatory convertible preferred
stock and New Senior Notes and cash on hand (i) to finance
the Acquisition, (ii) to repurchase NRGs outstanding
Second Priority Notes, (iii) to repurchase Texas
Gencos outstanding Unsecured Senior Notes, (iv) to
repay amounts outstanding under NRGs existing senior
secured credit facility and Texas Gencos existing senior
secured credit facility, (v) for ongoing credit needs of
the combined company, including replacement of existing letters
of credit and (vi) to pay related premiums, fees and
expenses. In the event that NRG does not consummate the
Acquisition, NRG intends to use the net proceeds from this
offering for general corporate purposes. See Use of
Proceeds.
The closing of this offering is not contingent on the closing of
the mandatory convertible preferred stock offering, the closing
of the New Senior Notes offering, the effectiveness of the new
senior secured credit facility, the completion of the tender
offers and receipt of the consents in connection with the
outstanding tender offers for NRGs and Texas Gencos
notes or the consummation of the Acquisition. See Risk
Factors Risks Related to the Offering There can be
no assurance that the Acquisition will be consummated in
accordance with the anticipated timing or at all, and the
closing of this offering is not conditioned on
S-4
the consummation of the Acquisition. If the Acquisition is not
consummated, NRGs common stock will not reflect any actual
or anticipated interest in Texas Genco, and if the Acquisition
is delayed, this interest will not be reflected during the
period of delay. NRGs obligations under the
Acquisition Agreement are not conditioned upon the consummation
of any or all of the Financing Transactions.
NRG has entered into an amended and restated commitment letter,
or the commitment letter, with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding,
Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Lehman Commercial Paper
Inc., Lehman Brothers Inc., Banc of America Bridge LLC, Deutsche
Bank AG Cayman Islands Branch, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation
and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., or the bridge lenders.
Under the commitment letter, the bridge lenders have committed
to fund NRGs new senior secured credit facility and
provide, subject to certain conditions, the additional financing
required for the Acquisition through a $5.1 billion bridge
loan facility in the event that sufficient funds are not raised
from this offering, the mandatory convertible preferred stock
offering and/or the New Senior Notes offering. See
Description of Certain Indebtedness Bridge Loan
Facility. In the event that NRG is unable to raise
sufficient proceeds through the consummation of this offering,
the mandatory convertible preferred stock offering and/or the
New Senior Notes offering, NRG may draw down on the bridge loan
facility, in whole or in part, in order to finance the
Acquisition. In the event that NRG does not consummate the
mandatory convertible preferred stock offering and the New
Senior Notes offering as currently contemplated and elects not
to consummate the financing under the bridge loan facility, it
could seek alternative sources of financing for the Acquisition,
which may include, among other alternatives, the issuance in
part of senior secured debt securities or borrowing in part on a
senior secured basis.
Sources and Uses of Funds
The following table sets forth the expected sources and uses of
funds in connection with the Acquisition on a pro forma basis
giving effect to the Transactions as if they had occurred on
September 30, 2005. No assurances can be given that the
information in the following table will not change depending on
the nature of our financings and/or whether the Acquisition will
be consummated in accordance with the anticipated timing or at
all. See Risk Factors Risks Related to the
Acquisition Because the historical and pro forma financial
information incorporated by reference or included elsewhere in
this prospectus supplement may not be representative of our
results as a combined company or capital structure after the
Acquisition, and NRGs and Texas Gencos historical
financial information are not comparable to their current
financial information, you have limited financial information on
which to evaluate us, NRG, Texas Genco and your investment
decision, Risk Factors Risks Related to the
Offering If NRG is unable to raise sufficient proceeds
through other Financing Transactions described elsewhere in this
prospectus supplement, NRG may draw down on a bridge loan
facility in order to close the Acquisition which would
significantly increase our indebtedness. If NRG elects not to
consummate the financing under the bridge loan facility, NRG may
seek alternative sources of financing for the Acquisition, the
terms of which are unknown to us and could limit our ability to
operate our business and Risk Factors Risks
Related to the Offering There can be no assurance that the
Acquisition will be consummated in accordance with the
anticipated timing or at all, and the closing of this offering
is not conditioned on the consummation of the Acquisition. If
the Acquisition is not
S-5
consummated, NRGs common stock will not reflect any actual
or anticipated interest in Texas Genco, and if the Acquisition
is delayed, this interest will not be reflected during the
period of delay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
Sources(1) |
|
(in millions) | |
|
|
| |
Gross proceeds of common stock offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,016 |
|
New senior secured term loan facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
Cash released from canceling existing funded letter of credit
facility(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
Gross proceeds of mandatory convertible preferred stock offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
Common stock consideration to be issued to Sellers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,606 (2 |
) |
Gross proceeds of 2014 fixed rate notes offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
Gross proceeds of 2016 fixed rate notes offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
NRGs cash on hand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
Uses |
|
(in millions) | |
|
|
| |
Purchase price less acquisition
costs(2) |
|
|
|
$ |
6,005 |
|
Texas Gencos cash on hand to reduce consideration
|
|
|
|
|
(222 |
) |
Refinancing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of NRGs existing credit
facilities(3)
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of Texas Gencos existing credit facilities
(4)
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total repayment of existing credit facilities
|
|
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
Repurchase of NRGs Second Priority
Notes(5)
|
|
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
Repurchase of Texas Gencos Unsecured Senior
Notes(6)
|
|
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
Accrued interest for NRG and Texas Genco outstanding debt
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
Estimated underwriting commissions, tender offer premiums, fees
and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
NRG has entered into the commitment letter with the bridge
lenders pursuant to which the bridge lenders have committed to
fund NRGs new senior secured credit facility and provide,
subject to certain conditions, the additional financing required
for the Acquisition through a $5.1 billion bridge loan
facility in the event that this offering, the mandatory
convertible preferred stock offering and/or the New Senior Notes
offering are not consummated. In the event that NRG is unable to
raise sufficient proceeds through the consummation of this
offering, the mandatory convertible preferred stock offering and
the New Senior Notes offering, NRG may draw down on the bridge
loan facility, in whole or in part, in order to finance the
Acquisition. In the event that NRG does not consummate the
mandatory convertible preferred stock offering and the New
Senior Notes offering as currently contemplated and elects not
to consummate the financing under the bridge loan facility, it
could seek alternative sources of financing for the Acquisition,
which may include, among other alternatives, the issuance in
part of senior secured debt securities or borrowing in part on a
senior secured basis. |
|
(2) |
The common stock component of the consideration for the
Acquisition is based on a fair value of $45.37 per share of
NRGs common stock and consideration with a fair value of
$368 million, or the Other Consideration, which may be
comprised either of an additional 9,038,125 shares of
common stock, additional cash, shares of a new series of
NRGs Cumulative Preferred Stock or a combination of the
foregoing. This fair value is based on an average stock price of
$40.73, as prescribed by the Acquisition Agreement. The Company
has elected to pay this amount in cash. This is because the
foregoing table is based on a pro forma closing date of the
Acquisition of September 30, 2005. To the extent the fair
value of NRGs common stock price for purposes of the
equity component, and Texas Gencos cash on hand, is
different at closing of the Acquisition, this amount and the
purchase price for the Acquisition will be adjusted accordingly. |
|
(3) |
Before giving effect to the Acquisition and the Financing
Transactions, as of September 30, 2005, NRG had
$876.6 million of outstanding indebtedness under its
amended and restated credit facility, which consisted of (a)
$446.6 million in term loans outstanding, which term loans
provide for interest at a rate of LIBOR (4.02% at
September 30, 2005) plus 187.5 basis points payable
quarterly and mature on December 24, 2011, (b)
$80.0 million in principal amount outstanding under the
revolving credit facility, which provides for interest at a rate
of LIBOR (3.83% at September 30, 2005) plus 2.5% and
matures on December 24, 2007 and (c) $350.0 million
outstanding under the funded letter of credit facility, which
provide for a participation fee of 1.875%, a deposit fee of
0.10%, and an issuance fee of 0.25%, and matures on
December 24, 2011. |
|
(4) |
Before giving effect to the Acquisition and Financing
Transactions, as of September 30, 2005, Texas Genco had
$1,614 million in term loans outstanding under its existing
senior secured credit facility, which term loans provide for
interest at a rate of 5.94% (as of September 30, 2005)
payable at least quarterly and mature in December 2011. |
|
(5) |
Before giving effect to the Acquisition and Financing
Transactions, as of September 30, 2005, NRG had
$1.08 billion of Second Priority Notes outstanding, which
provide for cash interest at 8.0% per annum payable semiannually. |
|
(6) |
Before giving effect to the Acquisition and Financing
Transactions, as of September 30, 2005, Texas Genco had
$1.125 billion of Unsecured Senior Notes outstanding, which
provide for cash interest at 6.875% per annum payable
semiannually. |
S-6
Recent Developments
|
|
|
Acquisitions and Dispositions |
We anticipate that the following transactions will be
consummated after the Acquisition and Financing Transactions.
On December 8, 2005, NRG entered into an asset purchase and
sale agreement to sell NRG Audrain Generating LLC, or Audrain, a
gas fired 577 MW peaking facility in Vandalia, Missouri to
AmerenUE, a subsidiary of Ameren Corporation. The purchase price
is $115 million, subject to customary purchase price
adjustments, plus the assumption of $240 million of
non-recourse capital lease obligations and assignment of a
$240 million note receivable. Of the $115 million in
cash proceeds, approximately $93 million of the proceeds
will be paid to the project lenders with the balance of
approximately $22 million paid to NRG. This transaction,
which is subject to regulatory approval, is expected to close
during the first half of 2006.
On December 27, 2005, NRG entered into two purchase and
sale agreements with Dynegy Inc., or Dynegy, through which the
companies will each simultaneously purchase the others
interest in two jointly held entities that own power generation
facilities in the states of California and Illinois,
respectively. Under the purchase and sale agreement for the
California interests, NRG will acquire Dynegys 50%
interest in WCP (Generation) Holdings LLC, or WCP Holdings, for
a purchase price of $205 million. As a result of this
transaction, NRG will become the sole owner of power plants
totaling approximately 1,800 MW in southern California.
Pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale agreement for the
Illinois interests, NRG will sell to Dynegy its 50% ownership
interest in the jointly held entity that owns the Rocky Road
power plant, a 330 MW natural gas-fired peaking facility
near Chicago, for a purchase price of $45 million. NRG will
effectively fund the net purchase price of $160 million
with cash held by West Coast Power LLC, or WCP. The
transactions, which are conditioned upon each other and subject
to regulatory approval, are expected to close in the first
quarter of 2006.
These transactions have been reflected in our pro forma
financial statements as filed on our amended Current Report on
Form 8-K/A filed
on January 23, 2006 and our amended Current Report on Form
8-K/A filed on January 26, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations |
On January 24, 2006, NRG announced that it had received
valid tenders and consents from holders of approximately
$1,078,141,353 in aggregate principal amount of Second Priority
Notes and $1,125,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of
Unsecured Senior Notes, representing approximately 99.78% and
100% of the outstanding Second Priority Notes and Unsecured
Senior Notes, respectively, in connection with the cash tender
offer and consent solicitation for the Second Priority Notes and
the Unsecured Senior Notes. Consummation of the tenders offers
are conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain conditions.
NRG Energy, Inc. is a Delaware corporation. Our principal
executive office is located at 211 Carnegie Center, Princeton,
New Jersey 08540, and our telephone number at that address is
(609) 524-4500. Our website is located at
www.nrgenergy.com. The information on, or linked to, our website
is not part of this prospectus supplement.
S-7
The Offering
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
Securities Offered |
|
20,855,057 shares of common stock. |
|
Initial Price |
|
$48.75 for each share of common stock. |
|
Common Stock to be Outstanding After this Offering, Not
Including the Option to Purchase Additional Shares, as of
January 3, 2006 |
|
101,556,945 million shares. |
|
Option to Purchase Additional Shares |
|
To the extent that the underwriters sell more than 20,855,057
shares of common stock, the underwriters have the option to
purchase up to 3,128,259 additional shares of common stock from
us at the initial public offering price, less underwriting
discount, within 30 days from the date of the prospectus
supplement. If the underwriters exercise their option in full,
we will offer an aggregate of 23,983,316 shares and we will have
104,685,204 shares of common stock outstanding. |
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
We estimate that the net proceeds of this offering, after giving
effect to underwriting discounts and estimated expenses payable
by us, will be approximately $985.1 million. We intend to
use the net proceeds from this offering and the offerings of New
Senior Notes and the mandatory convertible preferred stock,
together with initial borrowings under our new senior secured
credit facility and cash on hand, (i) to finance the
Acquisition, (ii) to repurchase NRGs outstanding
Second Priority Notes, (iii) to repurchase Texas
Gencos outstanding Unsecured Senior Notes, (iv) to
repay amounts outstanding under NRGs existing senior
secured credit facility and Texas Gencos existing senior
secured credit facility, (v) for ongoing credit needs of
the combined company, including replacement of existing letters
of credit and (vi) to pay related fees, premiums and
expenses. See Use of Proceeds. |
|
Dividends |
|
NRG has not declared or paid dividends on its common stock in
the past, although, subject to certain restrictions, we may do
so in the future. See Price Range of Common Stock and
Dividend Policy. |
|
The New York Stock Exchange
Symbol |
|
NRG |
The total number of shares of common stock to be outstanding as
of January 3, 2006 after this offering excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 3,135,897 shares issuable upon the exercise of
currently outstanding stock options or upon the conversion of
stock units issued pursuant to our incentive plans; |
|
|
|
13,075,986 shares reserved for future issuance upon conversion
of NRGs 4% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock and
8,670,000 shares reserved for future issuance upon conversion of
NRGs 3.625% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock; and |
|
|
|
between approximately 8,271,200 and 10,256,400 million shares
issuable upon conversion of our mandatory convertible preferred
stock offered concurrently with this offering (or between
approximately 1,240,680 and 1,538,460 shares of common stock if
the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full),
depending upon the price of our common stock at the time of
conversion. |
S-8
Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial Information
The following table presents summary historical consolidated
financial information of (i) NRG as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and as of and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005, (ii) Texas Genco as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2004 and as of and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, and (iii) the
combined company on a pro forma basis for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and as of and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, giving effect to (a) the
reclassification of Audrain as a discontinued operation; see
Recent Developments; (b) the inclusion of
the results pursuant to the ROFR (as described below);
(c) the refinancing of NRGs old debt structure;
(d) the remaining Financing Transactions and subsequent
Acquisition; and (e) the acquisition of the remaining 50%
ownership interest in WCP Holdings and the sale of our 50%
ownership interest in Rocky Road; see Recent
Developments.
The summary historical consolidated financial information of NRG
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 were derived
from the audited consolidated financial information contained in
the audited consolidated financial statements of NRG
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement. The
summary unaudited historical consolidated financial information
for NRG as of and for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 (i) were derived from NRGs unaudited
consolidated financial statements which are incorporated by
reference into this prospectus supplement, (ii) have been
prepared on a similar basis to that used in the preparation of
the audited financial statements of NRG and (iii) in the
opinion of NRGs management, include all adjustments
necessary for a fair statement of the results for the unaudited
interim period. The results for periods for less than a full
year are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for any interim period.
The summary historical consolidated financial information of
Texas Genco as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004
were derived from the audited consolidated financial information
contained in the audited consolidated financial statements of
Texas Genco incorporated by reference into this prospectus
supplement. The summary unaudited historical consolidated
financial information for Texas Genco as of and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 (i) were derived from
Texas Gencos unaudited financial statements which are
incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement,
(ii) have been prepared on a similar basis to that used in
the preparation of the audited financial statements of Texas
Genco, and (iii) in the opinion of Texas Gencos
management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair
statement of the results for the unaudited interim period. The
results for periods for less than a full year are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any
interim period.
The historical financial information for WCP as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2004 were derived from the audited
financial statements of WCP as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 contained as Exhibit 99.1 in
NRGs
Form 10-K filed on
March 30, 2005. The unaudited historical consolidated
financial information as of and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 (i) have been derived from
WCPs unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
that are included as Exhibit 99.06 to the current report on
Form 8-K/A filed
on January 5, 2006, (ii) have been prepared on a
similar basis to that used in the preparation of the audited
financial statements and (iii) in the opinion of WCPs
management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair
statement of the results for the unaudited interim period.
The unaudited pro forma combined income statement data and other
financial data for the combined company for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 give effect to (a) the
reclassification of Audrain as a discontinued operation;
(b) the inclusion of the results pursuant to the ROFR;
(c) the refinancing of NRGs old debt structure;
(d) the remaining Financing Transactions and subsequent
Acquisition; and (e) the acquisition of the remaining 50%
ownership interest in WCP Holdings and the sale of our 50%
ownership interest in Rocky Road, as if they had occurred on
January 1, 2004. The unaudited pro forma combined balance
sheet data as of September 30, 2005 gives effect to
(a) the sale of Audrain as of September 30, 2005;
(b) the refinancing of NRGs old debt structure;
(c) the remaining Financing Transactions and subsequent
Acquisition; and (d) the acquisition of the remaining 50%
ownership interest in WCP Holdings and the sale of our 50%
ownership interest in Rocky Road as if they had occurred on
September 30, 2005. The adjustments reflected in the
unaudited pro forma financial data are
S-9
based on available information and assumptions management
believes are reasonable. However, due to the lack of asset
appraisals and a future closing date, it is difficult to
estimate a pro forma allocation of purchase price for the
Acquisition. For purposes of these pro forma statements we have
assumed that the consideration paid in excess of the historical
book value of net assets acquired is related to the step-up in
fair value of Texas Gencos emission credit inventory, a
step-up in the value of Texas Gencos fixed assets, and an
increase in liabilities for assumed out-of-market contracts.
Once the Acquisition is closed, the excess of the estimated
purchase price may differ considerably from these assumptions
based on the results of appraisals and the finalization of the
purchase price allocation as a result of closing and other
analyses, which NRG is obtaining. The other analyses include
actuarial studies of employee benefit plans, income tax effects
of the Acquisition, analyses of operations to identify assets
for disposition and the evaluation of staffing requirements
necessary to meet future business needs. Ultimately, the excess
of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible
and identified intangible assets acquired will be recorded as
goodwill.
The unaudited pro forma financial information is for
informational purposes only, however, and is based on several
assumptions, including our assumptions regarding the Financing
Transactions and the Acquisition, that may prove to be
inaccurate. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data
presented below do not purport to represent what the combined
companys results of operations would actually have been
had the Acquisition and the Financing Transactions in fact
occurred on the dates specified above or to project the combined
companys results of operations for any future period.
The historical consolidated financial information and the
unaudited pro forma combined financial information set forth
below should be read in conjunction with (i) the
consolidated financial statements of NRG, the related notes
thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in
NRGs annual report for the year ended December 31,
2004 as amended by the current report on
Form 8-K filed on
December 20, 2005, and quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, each as incorporated
in this prospectus supplement by reference, (ii) the
consolidated financial statements of Texas Genco and Texas Genco
Holdings, Inc., the related notes thereto and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, each as incorporated
in this prospectus supplement by reference to NRGs current
report on Form 8-K
filed on December 21, 2005, (iii) the financial
statements of WCP, the related notes thereto included in
NRGs annual report on
Form 10-K as
Exhibit 99.1 as of and for the year ended December 31,
2004 and the financial statements as of and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 as found in Exhibit 99.06 to
the current report on
Form 8-K/A filed
on January 5, 2006 and (iv) Selected
Consolidated Financial Information of NRG, Selected
Consolidated Financial Information of Texas Genco,
Risk Factors Risks Related to the Acquisition
Because the historical and pro forma financial information
incorporated by reference or included elsewhere in this
prospectus supplement may not be representative of our results
as a combined company or capital structure after the
Acquisition, and NRGs and Texas Gencos historical
financial information are not comparable to their current
financial information, you have limited financial information on
which to evaluate us, NRG, Texas Genco and your investment
decision, and Risk Factors Risks Related to
the Offering If NRG is unable to raise sufficient proceeds
through other Financing Transactions described elsewhere in this
prospectus supplement, NRG may draw down on a bridge loan
facility in order to close the Acquisition which would
significantly increase our indebtedness. If NRG elects not to
consummate the financing under the bridge loan facility, NRG may
seek alternative sources of financing for the Acquisition, the
terms of which are unknown to us and could limit our ability to
operate our business elsewhere in this prospectus
supplement. In addition, no assurance can be given that the
Acquisition will be consummated in accordance with the
anticipated timing or at all. See Risk Factors Risks
Related to the Offering There can be no assurance that the
Acquisition will be consummated in accordance with the
anticipated timing or at all, and the closing of this offering
is not conditioned on the consummation of the Acquisition. If
the Acquisition is not consummated, NRGs common stock, and
therefore our mandatory convertible preferred stock, will not
reflect any actual or anticipated interest in Texas Genco, and
if the Acquisition is delayed, this interest will not be
reflected during the period of delay.
S-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Energy, | |
|
Texas Genco | |
|
NRG Energy, | |
|
Texas Genco | |
|
Pro Forma Combined | |
|
|
Inc.(1) | |
|
LLC | |
|
Inc.(1) | |
|
LLC | |
|
Company(1)(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year | |
|
July 19, 2004 | |
|
For the Nine | |
|
For the Nine | |
|
For the Year | |
|
For the Nine | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
through | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share data) | |
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$ |
2,347,882 |
|
|
$ |
95,847 |
|
|
$ |
1,942,828 |
|
|
$ |
1,999,827 |
|
|
$ |
5,394,910 |
|
|
$ |
5,180,190 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,955,887 |
|
|
|
82,105 |
|
|
|
1,861,569 |
|
|
|
1,502,170 |
|
|
|
4,559,583 |
|
|
|
3,820,967 |
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
159,144 |
|
|
|
(20,133 |
) |
|
|
6,991 |
|
|
|
345,928 |
|
|
|
186,710 |
|
|
|
620,145 |
|
Income/(loss) on discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
26,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
185,617 |
|
|
|
(20,133 |
) |
|
|
19,603 |
|
|
|
345,928 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
(114,360 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,744 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,518 |
) |
|
|
(73,781 |
) |
|
|
(120,104 |
) |
|
|
(119,299 |
) |
Cash flows from operating
activities
|
|
|
643,993 |
|
|
|
36,023 |
|
|
|
(113,802 |
) |
|
|
408,821 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$ |
1.86 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
)(3) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
4.11 |
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
1.85 |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
)(3) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,103,678 |
|
|
$ |
85,939 |
|
|
$ |
504,336 |
|
|
$ |
222,393 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
$ |
163,065 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
109,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
91,508 |
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
7,830,283 |
|
|
|
4,587,566 |
|
|
|
7,795,367 |
|
|
|
6,098,723 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
20,831,886 |
|
Total long-term debt including current maturities
|
|
|
3,723,854 |
|
|
|
2,280,105 |
|
|
|
3,042,398 |
|
|
|
2,742,910 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
8,009,504 |
|
Stockholders equity/(deficit)
|
|
|
2,692,164 |
|
|
|
771,516 |
|
|
|
2,019,168 |
|
|
|
773,112 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
4,966,403 |
|
|
|
(1) |
NRGs results and our pro forma results include the
following items that have had a significant impact on operations
during the periods indicated below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
NRG Energy, Inc. | |
|
Combined Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
For the Year | |
|
For the Nine | |
|
For the Year | |
|
For the Nine | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
(Income)/loss on discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$ |
26,473 |
|
|
$ |
12,612 |
|
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
(a |
) |
Corporate relocation charges
|
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
|
5,651 |
|
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
|
5,651 |
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
(13,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and impairment charges
|
|
|
44,661 |
|
|
|
6,223 |
|
|
|
69,009 |
|
|
|
6,223 |
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(689 |
) |
|
|
(28,358 |
) |
Write downs, gains and losses on sales of equity method
investments
|
|
|
(16,270 |
) |
|
|
15,894 |
|
|
|
(16,270 |
) |
|
|
15,894 |
|
FERC authorized settlement
|
|
|
(38,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Write down of Note Receivable
|
|
|
4,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Our pro forma combined company reflects items from continuing
operations only. |
|
|
(2) |
On May 19, 2005, pursuant to the exercise of a right of
first refusal, or the ROFR, by Texas Genco, subsequent to a
third party offer to American Electric Power, or AEP, in early
2004, Texas Genco acquired from AEP an additional 13.2%
undivided interest in South Texas Project Electric Generating
Station, or STP. As a result, Texas Genco currently owns a 44.0%
undivided interest in STP. For pro forma purposes, NRG has
accounted for the ROFR as a business acquisition and included
the ROFR in its pro forma adjustments to the statements of
operation. NRG has also accounted for the sale of Audrain, the
acquisition of WCP Holdings and the sale of Rocky Road for
purposes of these pro forma financial statements. |
|
(3) |
For the period from July 19, 2004 through December 31,
2004. |
S-11
RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
The risks below are not the only risks that we face. Additional
risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely
affect our business operations. The following risks could affect
our business, financial condition or results of operations. In
such a case, you may lose all or part of your original
investment. You should carefully consider the risks described
below as well as other information and data set forth in this
prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus and the
documents incorporated by reference herein and therein before
making an investment decision with respect to the common
stock.
Risks Related to the Operation of our Business
|
|
|
Many of our power generation facilities operate, wholly or
partially, without long-term power sale agreements. |
Many of our facilities operate as merchant
facilities without long-term power sale agreements, and
therefore are exposed to market fluctuations. Without the
benefit of long-term power purchase agreements for certain
assets, we cannot be sure that we will be able to sell any or
all of the power generated by these facilities at commercially
attractive rates or that these facilities will be able to
operate profitably. This could lead to future impairments of our
property, plant and equipment or to the closing of certain of
our facilities resulting in economic losses and liabilities,
which could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition or cash flows.
|
|
|
Our financial performance may be impacted by future
decreases in oil and natural gas prices, significant and
unpredictable price fluctuations in the wholesale power markets
and other market factors that are beyond our control. |
A significant percentage of the combined companys domestic
revenues is derived from baseload power plants that are fueled
by coal or nuclear fuel. In many of the competitive markets
where NRG and Texas Genco operate, the price of power typically
is set by marginal cost natural gas-fired and oil-fired power
plants that currently have substantially higher variable costs
than our solid fuel baseload power plants. This tends to
increase the market clearing price for power. The current
pricing and cost environment allows NRGs and Texas
Gencos baseload coal and nuclear fuel generation assets to
earn attractive operating margins compared to plants fueled by
natural gas and oil. A decrease in oil and natural gas prices
could be expected to result in a corresponding decrease in the
market price of power but would generally not affect the cost of
the solid fuels that NRG and Texas Genco use. This could
significantly reduce the operating margins of NRGs and
Texas Gencos baseload generation assets and materially and
adversely impact NRGs and Texas Gencos financial
performance.
We sell all or a portion of the energy, capacity and other
products from many of our facilities to wholesale power markets,
including energy markets operated by independent system
operators, or ISOs, or regional transmission organizations, or
RTOs, as well as wholesale purchasers. We are generally not
entitled to traditional cost-based regulation, therefore we sell
electric generation capacity, power and ancillary services to
wholesale purchasers at prices determined by the market. As a
result, we are not guaranteed any rate of return on our capital
investments through mandated rates, and our revenues and results
of operations depend upon current and forward market prices for
power.
Market prices for power, generation capacity and ancillary
services tend to fluctuate substantially. Unlike most other
commodities, electric power can only be stored on a very limited
basis and generally must be produced concurrently with its use.
As a result, power prices are subject to significant volatility
from supply and demand imbalances, especially in the day-ahead
and spot markets. Long-term and short-term power prices may also
fluctuate substantially due to other factors outside of our
control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
increases and decreases in generation capacity in our markets,
including the addition of new supplies of power from existing
competitors or new market entrants as a result of the
development of new generation plants, expansion of existing
plants or additional transmission capacity; |
S-12
|
|
|
|
|
changes in power transmission or fuel transportation capacity
constraints or inefficiencies; |
|
|
|
electric supply disruptions, including plant outages and
transmission disruptions; |
|
|
|
weather conditions; |
|
|
|
changes in the demand for power or in patterns of power usage,
including the potential development of demand-side management
tools and practices; |
|
|
|
availability of competitively priced alternative power sources; |
|
|
|
development of new fuels and new technologies for the production
of power; |
|
|
|
natural disasters, wars, embargoes, terrorist attacks and other
catastrophic events; |
|
|
|
regulations and actions of the ISOs or RTOs; and |
|
|
|
federal and state power market and environmental regulation and
legislation. |
These factors have caused NRGs and Texas Gencos
quarterly operating results to fluctuate in the past and will
continue to cause them to do so in the future.
|
|
|
Our costs, results of operations, financial condition and
cash flows could be adversely impacted by an increase in fuel
prices or disruption of our fuel supplies. |
We rely on coal, nuclear fuel derived from uranium, oil and
natural gas to fuel our power generation facilities. Delivery of
these fuels to our facilities is dependent upon the continuing
financial viability of contractual counterparties as well as
upon the infrastructure (including rail lines, rail cars, barge
facilities, roadways, and natural gas pipelines) available to
serve each generation facility. As a result, we are subject to
the risks of disruptions or curtailments in the production of
power at our generation facilities if a counterparty fails to
perform or if there is a disruption in the fuel delivery
infrastructure.
The combined company has sold forward a substantial part of its
baseload power in order to lock in long-term prices that it
deemed to be favorable at the time it entered into the forward
sale contracts. In order to hedge our obligations under these
forward power sales contracts, we have entered into long-term
and short-term contracts for the purchase and delivery of fuel.
Many of our forward power sales contracts do not allow us to
pass through changes in fuel costs or discharge the
companys power sale obligations in the case of a
disruption in fuel supply due to force majeure events or the
default of a fuel supplier or transporter. Disruptions in our
fuel supplies may therefore require us to find alternative fuel
sources at higher costs, to find other sources of power to
deliver to counterparties at higher cost, or to pay damages to
counterparties for failure to deliver power as contracted. Any
such event could have a material adverse effect on our financial
performance.
We also buy significant quantities of fuel on a short-term or
spot market basis. Prices for all of our fuels fluctuate,
sometimes rising or falling significantly over a short period.
The price we can obtain for the sale of energy may not rise at
the same rate, or may not rise at all, to match a rise in fuel
or delivery costs. This may have a material adverse effect on
our financial performance. Changes in market prices for natural
gas, coal and oil may result from the following:
|
|
|
|
|
weather conditions; |
|
|
|
seasonality; |
|
|
|
demand for energy commodities and general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
disruption of electricity, gas or coal transmission or
transportation, infrastructure or other constraints or
inefficiencies; |
|
|
|
additional generating capacity; |
|
|
|
availability of competitively priced alternative energy sources; |
S-13
|
|
|
|
|
availability and levels of storage and inventory for fuel stocks; |
|
|
|
natural gas, crude oil, refined products and coal production
levels; |
|
|
|
the creditworthiness or bankruptcy or other financial distress
of market participants; |
|
|
|
changes in market liquidity; |
|
|
|
natural disasters, wars, embargoes, acts of terrorism and other
catastrophic events; |
|
|
|
federal, state and foreign governmental regulation and
legislation; and |
|
|
|
our creditworthiness and liquidity and willingness of fuel
suppliers/transporters to do business with us. |
Our plant operating characteristics and equipment, particularly
at our coal-fired plants, often dictate the specific fuel
quality to be combusted. The availability and price of specific
fuel qualities may vary due to supplier financial or operational
disruptions, transportation disruptions and force majeure. At
times, coal of specific quality may not be available at any
price, or we may not be able to transport such coal to our
facilities on a timely basis. In such case, we may not be able
to run a coal facility even if it would be profitable. Operating
a coal facility with lesser quality coal can lead to emission or
operating problems. If we had sold forward the power from such a
coal facility, we could be required to supply or purchase power
from alternate sources, perhaps at a loss. This could have a
material adverse impact on the financial results of specific
plants and on our results of operations.
Texas Genco procures approximately 70% of the fuel for its
Limestone facility from a lignite mine adjacent to the plant,
pursuant to a contract that expires in 2015. The contract has
been the subject of past litigation over pricing and other
matters, and requires the parties periodically to renegotiate
both the price and volume of lignite provided. If we are unable
to renegotiate the terms of the agreement, if the counterparty
fails to perform, or if the mine is unable to yield sufficient
quantities of lignite, we could experience a disruption of
supply, which could result in a curtailment or shutdown of the
Limestone plant, or could require us to acquire the fuel at
higher spot market prices.
The owners (including Texas Genco) of STP satisfy fuel supply
requirements for STP by acquiring uranium concentrates and
contracting to convert uranium concentrates into uranium
hexafluoride, enrich uranium hexafluoride and fabricate nuclear
fuel assemblies. These contracts have varying expiration dates,
and most are short to medium term. A disruption in uranium
supplies, or in conversion, enrichment or fabrication services,
could adversely affect operations at STP or increase the fuel
costs associated with operations.
|
|
|
There may be periods when we will not be able to meet our
commitments under our forward sales obligations at a reasonable
cost or at all. |
A substantial portion of the output from NRGs units is
sold forward under fixed price power sales contracts through
2010, and we also sell forward the output from our intermediate
and peaking facilities when we deem it commercially advantageous
to do so. Because our obligations under most of these agreements
are not contingent on a unit being available to generate power,
we are generally required to deliver power to the buyer, even in
the event of a plant outage, fuel supply disruption or a
reduction in the available capacity of the unit. To the extent
that we do not have sufficient lower cost capacity to meet our
commitments under our forward sales obligations, we would be
required to supply replacement power either by running our
other, higher cost power plants or by obtaining power from
third-party sources at market prices that could substantially
exceed the contract price. If we failed to deliver the
contracted power, then we would be required to pay the
difference between the market price at the delivery point and
the contract price, and the amount of such payments could be
substantial.
In NRGs South Central region, NRG has long-term contracts
with rural cooperatives that require it to serve all of the
cooperatives requirements at prices that generally reflect
the costs of coal-fired generation. At times, the output from
NRGs coal-fired Big Cajun II facility is inadequate to
serve these obligations, and when that happens NRG typically
purchases power from other power producers, often at a loss.
NRGs
S-14
financial returns from its South Central region are likely to
deteriorate over time as the rural cooperatives grow their
customer bases, unless NRG is able to amend or renegotiate its
contracts with the cooperatives or add generating capacity.
|
|
|
Our trading operations and the use of hedging agreements
could result in financial losses that negatively impact our
results of operations. |
We enter into hedging agreements, including contracts to
purchase or sell commodities at future dates and at fixed
prices, in order to manage the commodity price risks inherent in
our power generation operations. These activities, although
intended to mitigate price volatility, expose us to other risks.
When we sell power forward, we give up the opportunity to sell
power at higher prices in the future, which not only may result
in lost opportunity costs but also may require us to post
significant amounts of cash collateral or other credit support
to our counterparties. Further, if the values of the financial
contracts change in a manner we do not anticipate, or if a
counterparty fails to perform under a contract, it could harm
our business, operating results or financial position.
We do not typically hedge the entire exposure of our operations
against commodity price volatility. To the extent we do not
hedge against commodity price volatility, our results of
operations and financial position may be improved or diminished
based upon movement in commodity prices.
From time to time we may engage in trading activities, including
the trading of power, fuel and emissions credits, that are not
directly related to the operation of our generation facilities
or the management of related risks. These trading activities
take place in volatile markets and some of these trades could be
characterized as speculative. We would expect to settle these
trades financially rather than through the production of power
or the delivery of fuel. This trading activity may expose us to
the risk of significant financial losses which could have a
material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient liquidity to hedge market risks
effectively. |
We are exposed to market risks through our power marketing
business, which involves the sale of energy, capacity and
related products and the purchase and sale of fuel, transmission
services and emission allowances. These market risks include,
among other risks, volatility arising from location and timing
differences that may be associated with buying and transporting
fuel, converting fuel into energy and delivering the energy to a
buyer.
We undertake these marketing activities through agreements with
various counterparties. Many of our agreements with
counterparties include provisions that require us to provide
guarantees, offset of netting arrangements, letters of credit, a
second lien on assets and/or cash collateral to protect the
counterparties against the risk of our default or insolvency.
The amount of such credit support that must be provided
typically is based on the difference between the price of the
commodity in a given contract and the market price of the
commodity. Significant movements in market prices can result in
our being required to provide cash collateral and letters of
credit in very large amounts. The effectiveness of our strategy
may be dependent on the amount of collateral available to enter
into or maintain these contracts, and liquidity requirements may
be greater than we anticipate or are able to meet. Without a
sufficient amount of working capital to post as collateral in
support of performance guarantees or as cash margin, we may not
be able to manage price volatility effectively or to implement
our strategy. An increase in demands from our counterparties to
post letters of credit or cash collateral may negatively affect
our liquidity position and financial condition.
Further, if our facilities experience unplanned outages, we may
be required to procure replacement power at spot market prices
in order to fulfill contractual commitments. Without adequate
liquidity to post margin and collateral requirements, we may be
exposed to significant losses, may miss significant
opportunities, and may have increased exposure to the volatility
of spot markets.
S-15
|
|
|
The accounting for our hedging activities may increase the
volatility in our quarterly and annual financial results. |
We engage in commodity-related marketing and price-risk
management activities in order to economically hedge our
exposure to market risk with respect to:
|
|
|
|
|
electricity sales from our generation assets; |
|
|
|
fuel utilized by those assets; and |
|
|
|
emission allowances. |
We generally attempt to balance our fixed-price physical and
financial purchases and sales commitments in terms of contract
volumes and the timing of performance and delivery obligations,
through the use of financial and physical derivative contracts.
These derivatives are accounted for in accordance with SFAS
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 137, SFAS
No. 138 and SFAS No. 149. SFAS No. 133 requires
us to record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value
with changes in the fair value resulting from fluctuations in
the underlying commodity prices immediately recognized in
earnings, unless the derivative qualifies for hedge accounting
treatment. Whether a derivative qualifies for hedge accounting
depends upon it meeting specific criteria used to determine if
hedge accounting is and will remain appropriate for the term of
the derivative. Economic hedges will not necessarily qualify for
hedge accounting treatment. As a result, we are unable to
predict the impact that our risk management decisions may have
on our quarterly and annual operating results.
|
|
|
Goodwill and/or other intangible assets that we will
record in connection with the Acquisition are subject to
mandatory annual impairment evaluations and as a result, the
combined company could be required to write off some or all of
this goodwill and other intangibles, which may adversely affect
its financial condition and results of operations. |
NRG will account for the Acquisition using the purchase method
of accounting. The purchase price for Texas Genco will be
allocated to identifiable tangible and intangible assets and
assumed liabilities based on estimated fair values at the date
of consummation of the Acquisition. Any unallocated portion of
the purchase price will be allocated to goodwill. On a pro forma
basis, approximately 23% of the pro forma combined
companys total assets will be goodwill and other
intangibles, of which approximately $2.4 billion will be
goodwill. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standard
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed annually or more
frequently for impairment and other intangibles are also
reviewed at least annually or more frequently, if certain
conditions exist, and may be amortized. Any reduction in or
impairment of the value of goodwill or other intangible assets
will result in a charge against earnings which could materially
adversely affect our reported results of operations and
financial position in future periods.
|
|
|
Competition in wholesale power markets may have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and the
market value of our assets. |
We have numerous competitors in all aspects of our business, and
additional competitors may enter the industry. Because many of
our facilities are old, newer plants owned by our competitors
are often more efficient than our aging plants, which may put
some of our plants at a competitive disadvantage to the extent
our competitors are able to consume the same fuel as we consume
at those plants. Over time, our plants may be squeezed out of
their markets, or may be unable to compete with these more
efficient plants.
In our power marketing and commercial operations, we compete on
the basis of our relative skills, financial position and access
to capital with other providers of electric energy in the
procurement of fuel and transportation services, and the sale of
capacity, energy and related products. In order to compete
successfully, we seek to aggregate fuel supplies at competitive
prices from different sources and locations and to efficiently
utilize transportation services from third-party pipelines,
railways and other fuel transporters and transmission services
from electric utilities.
S-16
Other companies with which we compete may have greater
liquidity, access to credit and other financial resources, lower
cost structures, more effective risk management policies and
procedures, greater ability to incur losses, longer-standing
relationships with customers, greater potential for
profitability from ancillary services or greater flexibility in
the timing of their sale of generation capacity and ancillary
services than we do.
Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new laws
or regulations or emerging technologies, or to devote greater
resources to the construction, expansion or refurbishment of
their power generation facilities than we can. In addition,
current and potential competitors may make strategic
acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships among
themselves or with third parties. Accordingly, it is possible
that new competitors or alliances among current and new
competitors may emerge and rapidly gain significant market
share. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete
successfully against current and future competitors, and any
failure to do so would have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flow. See Business Competition.
|
|
|
Operation of power generation facilities involves
significant risks that could have a material adverse effect on
our revenues and results of operations. |
The ongoing operation of our facilities involves risks that
include the breakdown or failure of equipment or processes,
performance below expected levels of output or efficiency and
the inability to transport our product to our customers in an
efficient manner due to a lack of transmission capacity.
Unplanned outages of generating units, including extensions of
scheduled outages due to mechanical failures or other problems
occur from time to time and are an inherent risk of our
business. Unplanned outages typically increase our operation and
maintenance expenses and may reduce our revenues as a result of
selling fewer MWh or require us to incur significant costs as a
result of running one of our higher cost units or obtaining
replacement power from third parties in the open market to
satisfy our forward power sales obligations. Our inability to
operate our plants efficiently, manage capital expenditures and
costs, and generate earnings and cash flow from our asset-based
businesses in relation to our debt and other obligations could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
financial condition or cash flows.
While we maintain insurance, obtain warranties from vendors and
obligate contractors to meet certain performance levels, the
proceeds of such insurance, warranties or performance guarantees
may not be adequate to cover our lost revenues, increased
expenses or liquidated damages payments should we experience
equipment breakdown or non-performance by contractors or vendors.
|
|
|
Construction, expansion and refurbishment of power
generation facilities involve significant risks that could
result in unplanned power outages or reduced output and could
have a material adverse effect on our revenues and results of
operations. |
Many of our facilities are old and are likely to require
periodic upgrade and improvement. Any unexpected failure,
including failure associated with breakdowns, forced outages or
any unanticipated capital expenditures, could result in reduced
profitability.
We cannot be certain of the level of capital expenditures that
will be required due to changing environmental and safety laws
and regulations (including changes in the interpretation or
enforcement thereof), needed facility repairs and unexpected
events (such as natural disasters or terrorist attacks). The
unexpected requirement of large capital expenditures could have
a material adverse effect on our financial performance and
condition.
If we make any major modifications to our power generation
facilities, we may be required to install the best available
control technology or to achieve the lowest achievable emissions
rate, as such terms are defined under the new source review
provisions of the federal Clean Air Act. Any such modifications
would likely result in substantial additional capital
expenditures.
We may also choose to undertake the repowering, refurbishment or
upgrading of current facilities based on our assessment that
such activity will provide adequate financial returns. Such
projects often require several
S-17
years of development and capital expenditures before
commencement of commercial operations, and key assumptions
underpinning a decision to make such an investment may prove
incorrect, including assumptions regarding construction costs,
timing, available financing and future fuel and power prices.
The construction, expansion, modification and refurbishment of
power generation facilities involve many additional risks,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
delays in obtaining necessary permits and licenses; |
|
|
|
environmental remediation of soil or groundwater at contaminated
sites; |
|
|
|
interruptions to dispatch at our facilities; |
|
|
|
supply interruptions; |
|
|
|
work stoppages; |
|
|
|
labor disputes; |
|
|
|
weather interferences; |
|
|
|
unforeseen engineering, environmental and geological problems;
and |
|
|
|
unanticipated cost overruns. |
Any of these risks could cause our financial returns on new
investments to be lower than expected, or could cause us to
operate below expected capacity or availability levels, which
could result in lost revenues, increased expenses, higher
maintenance costs and penalties.
|
|
|
Supplier and/or customer concentration at certain of our
facilities may expose us to significant financial credit or
performance risks. |
We often rely on a single contracted supplier or a small number
of suppliers for the provision of fuel, transportation of fuel
and other services required for the operation of certain of our
facilities. If these suppliers cannot perform, we utilize the
marketplace to provide these services. There can be no assurance
that the marketplace can provide these services.
At times, we rely on a single customer or a few customers to
purchase all or a significant portion of a facilitys
output, in some cases under long-term agreements that account
for a substantial percentage of the anticipated revenue from a
given facility. We have hedged a portion of our exposure to
power price fluctuations through forward fixed price power sales
and natural gas price swap agreements. Counterparties to these
agreements may breach or may be unable to perform their
obligations. We may not be able to enter into replacement
agreements on terms as favorable as our existing agreements, or
at all. If we were unable to enter into replacement power
purchase agreements, we would sell our plants power at
market prices. If we were unable to enter into replacement fuel
or fuel transportation purchase agreements, we would seek to
purchase our plants fuel requirements at market prices,
exposing us to market price volatility and the risk that fuel
and transportation may not be available during certain periods
at any price.
In the past several years, a substantial number of companies,
some of which serve as our counterparties from time to time,
have experienced downgrades in their credit ratings. The failure
of any supplier or customer to fulfill its contractual
obligations to us could have a material adverse effect on our
financial results. Consequently, the financial performance of
our facilities is dependent on the credit quality of, and
continued performance by, suppliers and customers.
|
|
|
We rely on power transmission facilities that we do not
own or control and are subject to transmission constraints
within a number of our core regions. If these facilities fail to
provide us with adequate transmission capacity, we may be
restricted in our ability to deliver wholesale electric power to
our customers and we may either incur additional costs or forego
revenues. Conversely, improvements to certain transmission
systems could also reduce revenues. |
S-18
We depend on transmission facilities owned and operated by
others to deliver the wholesale power we sell from our power
generation plants to our customers. If transmission is
disrupted, or if the transmission capacity infrastructure is
inadequate, our ability to sell and deliver wholesale power may
be adversely impacted. If a regions power transmission
infrastructure is inadequate, our recovery of wholesale costs
and profits may be limited. If restrictive transmission price
regulation is imposed, the transmission companies may not have
sufficient incentive to invest in expansion of transmission
infrastructure. We also cannot predict whether transmission
facilities will be expanded in specific markets to accommodate
competitive access to those markets.
In addition, in certain of the markets in which we operate,
energy transmission congestion may occur and we may be deemed
responsible for congestion costs if we schedule delivery of
power between congestion zones during times when congestion
occurs between the zones. If we are liable for congestion costs,
our financial results could be adversely affected.
In the ERCOT, California ISO, New York ISO and New England ISO
markets, the combined company will have a significant amount of
generation located in load pockets making that generation
valuable, particularly with respect to maintaining the
reliability of the transmission grid. Expansion of transmission
systems to reduce or eliminate these load pockets could
negatively impact the value or profitability of our existing
facilities in these areas.
|
|
|
Because we own less than a majority of some of our project
investments, we cannot exercise complete control over their
operations. |
We have limited control over the operation of some project
investments and joint ventures because our investments are in
projects where we beneficially own less than a majority of the
ownership interests. We seek to exert a degree of influence with
respect to the management and operation of projects in which we
own less than a majority of the ownership interests by
negotiating to obtain positions on management committees or to
receive certain limited governance rights, such as rights to
veto significant actions. However, we may not always succeed in
such negotiations. We may be dependent on our co-venturers to
operate such projects. Our co-venturers may not have the level
of experience, technical expertise, human resources management
and other attributes necessary to operate these projects
optimally. The approval of co-venturers also may be required for
us to receive distributions of funds from projects or to
transfer our interest in projects.
|
|
|
Future acquisition activities may not be
successful. |
We may seek to acquire additional companies or assets in our
industry. The acquisition of power generation companies and
assets is subject to substantial risks, including the failure to
identify material problems during due diligence, the risk of
over-paying for assets and the inability to arrange financing
for an acquisition as may be required or desired. Further, the
integration and consolidation of acquisitions requires
substantial human, financial and other resources and,
ultimately, our acquisitions may not be successfully integrated.
There can be no assurances that any future acquisitions will
perform as expected or that the returns from such acquisitions
will support the indebtedness incurred to acquire them or the
capital expenditures needed to develop them.
|
|
|
Our operations are subject to hazards customary to the
power generation industry. We may not have adequate insurance to
cover all of these hazards. |
Power generation involves hazardous activities, including
acquiring, transporting and unloading fuel, operating large
pieces of rotating equipment and delivering electricity to
transmission and distribution systems. In addition to natural
risks such as earthquake, flood, lightning, hurricane and wind,
other hazards, such as fire, explosion, structural collapse and
machinery failure are inherent risks in our operations. These
and other hazards can cause significant personal injury or loss
of life, severe damage to and destruction of property, plant and
equipment, contamination of, or damage to, the environment and
suspension of operations. The occurrence of any one of these
events may result in our being named as a defendant in lawsuits
asserting claims for substantial damages, including for
environmental cleanup costs, personal injury and property
S-19
damage and fines and/or penalties. We maintain an amount of
insurance protection that we consider adequate, but we cannot
assure you that our insurance will be sufficient or effective
under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities
to which we may be subject. A successful claim for which we are
not fully insured could hurt our financial results and
materially harm our financial condition. Further, due to rising
insurance costs and changes in the insurance markets, we cannot
assure you that insurance coverage will continue to be available
at all or at rates or on terms similar to those presently
available to us. Any losses not covered by insurance could have
a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
|
|
|
Our business is subject to substantial governmental
regulation and may be adversely affected by liability under, or
any future inability to comply with, existing or future
regulations or requirements. |
Our business is subject to extensive foreign, federal, state and
local laws and regulation. Compliance with the requirements
under these various regulatory regimes may cause us to incur
significant additional costs and failure to comply with such
requirements could result in the shutdown of the non-complying
facility, the imposition of liens, fines and/or civil or
criminal liability.
Public utilities under the Federal Power Act, or FPA, are
required to obtain the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commissions, or FERCs, acceptance of their rate
schedules for wholesale sales of electricity. All of NRGs
non-qualifying facility generating companies and power marketing
affiliates in the United States make sales of electricity in
interstate commerce and are public utilities for purposes of the
FPA. FERC has granted each of NRGs generating and power
marketing companies the authority to sell electricity at
market-based rates. The FERCs orders that grant NRGs
generating and power marketing companies market-based rate
authority reserve the right to revoke or revise that authority
if FERC subsequently determines that NRG can exercise market
power in transmission or generation, create barriers to entry or
engage in abusive affiliate transactions. In addition,
NRGs market-based sales are subject to certain market
behavior rules and, if any of NRGs generating and power
marketing companies were deemed to have violated one of those
rules, they are subject to potential disgorgement of profits
associated with the violation and/or suspension or revocation of
their market-based rate authority. If NRGs generating and
power marketing companies were to lose their market-based rate
authority, such companies would be required to obtain
FERCs acceptance of a cost-of-service rate schedule and
would become subject to the accounting, record-keeping and
reporting requirements that are imposed on utilities with
cost-based rate schedules. This could have an adverse effect on
the rates NRG charges for power from its facilities.
We are also affected by changes to market rules, tariffs,
changes in market structures, changes in administrative fee
allocations and changes in market bidding rules that occur in
the existing ISOs and RTOs. The ISOs and RTOs that oversee most
of the wholesale power markets impose, and in the future may
continue to impose, price limitations, offer caps, and other
mechanisms to address some of the volatility and the potential
exercise of market power in these markets. These types of price
limitations and other regulatory mechanisms may adversely affect
the profitability of our generation facilities that sell energy
and capacity into the wholesale power markets. In addition, the
regulatory and legislative changes that have recently been
enacted at the federal level and in a number of states in an
effort to promote competition are novel and untested in many
respects. These new approaches to the sale of electric power
have very short operating histories, and it is not yet clear how
they will operate in times of market stress or pressure, given
the extreme volatility and lack of meaningful long-term price
history in many of these markets and the imposition of price
limitations by independent system operators.
Similarly, the Texas Genco subsidiaries are registered as power
generation companies with the Public Utility Commission of
Texas, or PUCT. PUCT has jurisdiction with respect to the
mitigation of undue market power and has authority to remedy
market power abuses in the ERCOT market, both directly and,
indirectly, through oversight of ERCOT. PUCT has proposed a
significant change in the rules governing the ERCOT market.
Specifically the PUCT adopted a rule directing the ERCOT ISO to
develop and implement a wholesale market that, among other
things, replaces the existing zonal market design with a nodal
market design based on locational marginal prices for power. The
market redesign project is expected to take effect in 2009. We
expect that implementation of any new market design will require
modification to our procedures
S-20
and systems. We do not know for certain how the planned market
restructuring will affect our revenues, and some of the combined
companys plants in ERCOT may experience adverse pricing
effects due to their location on the transmission grid.
|
|
|
Texas Gencos ownership interest in a nuclear power
facility subjects it to regulations, costs and liabilities
uniquely associated with these types of facilities. |
Under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or AEA,
operation of STP, of which Texas Genco owns indirectly a 44.0%
interest, is subject to regulation by the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, or NRC. Such regulation includes licensing,
inspection, enforcement, testing, evaluation and modification of
all aspects of nuclear reactor power plant design and operation,
environmental and safety performance, technical and financial
qualifications, decommissioning funding assurance and transfer
and foreign ownership restrictions. Texas Gencos 44.0%
share of the output of STP represents approximately 1,101 MW of
generation capacity, which is approximately 10% of the total
gross generation capacity owned by Texas Genco.
There are unique risks to owning and operating a nuclear power
facility. These include liabilities related to the handling,
treatment, storage, disposal, transport, release and use of
radioactive materials, particularly with respect to spent
nuclear fuel, and uncertainties regarding the ultimate, and
potential exposure to, technical and financial risks associated
with modifying or decommissioning a nuclear facility. The NRC
could require the shutdown of the plant for safety reasons or
refuse to permit restart of the unit after unplanned or planned
outages. New or amended NRC safety and regulatory requirements
may give rise to additional operation and maintenance costs and
capital expenditures. STP may be obligated to continue storing
spent nuclear fuel if the Department of Energy continues to fail
to meet its contractual obligations to STP made pursuant to the
U.S. Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 to accept and dispose of
STPs spent nuclear fuel. See Business
Environmental Matters U.S. Federal Environmental
Initiatives Nuclear Waste. Costs associated with
these risks could be substantial and have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash
flow. In addition, to the extent that all or a part of STP is
required by the NRC to permanently or temporarily shut down or
modify its operations, or is otherwise subject to a forced
outage, Texas Genco may incur additional costs to the extent it
is obligated to provide power from more expensive alternative
sources either Texas Gencos own plants, third party
generators or the ERCOT to cover Texas Gencos then
existing forward sale obligations. Such shutdown or modification
could also lead to substantial costs related to the storage and
disposal of radioactive materials and spent nuclear fuel.
Texas Genco and the other owners of STP maintain nuclear
property and nuclear liability insurance coverage as required by
law. The Price-Anderson Act, as amended by the Energy Policy Act
of 2005, requires owners of nuclear power plants in the United
States to be collectively responsible for retrospective
secondary insurance premiums for liability to the public arising
from nuclear incidents resulting in claims in excess of the
required primary insurance coverage amount of $300 million
per reactor. The Price-Anderson Act only covers nuclear
liability associated with any accident in the course of
operation of the nuclear reactor, transportation of nuclear fuel
to the reactor site, in the storage of nuclear fuel and waste at
the reactor site and the transportation of the spent nuclear
fuel and nuclear waste from the nuclear reactor. All other
non-nuclear liabilities are not covered. Any substantial
retrospective premiums imposed under the Price-Anderson Act or
losses not covered by insurance could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
|
|
|
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations that
impose extensive and increasingly stringent requirements on our
ongoing operations, as well as potentially substantial
liabilities arising out of environmental contamination. These
environmental requirements and liabilities could adversely
impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows. |
Our business is subject to the environmental laws and
regulations of foreign, federal, state and local authorities. We
must comply with numerous environmental laws and regulations and
obtain numerous governmental permits and approvals to operate
our plants. If we fail to comply with any environmental
requirements that apply to our operations, we could be subject
to administrative, civil and/or criminal liability and fines,
and regulatory agencies could take other actions seeking to
curtail our operations. In addition, when
S-21
new requirements take effect or when existing environmental
requirements are revised, reinterpreted or subject to changing
enforcement policies, our business, results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Environmental laws and regulations have generally become more
stringent over time, and we expect this trend to continue. In
particular, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or USEPA,
has recently promulgated regulations requiring additional
reductions in nitrogen oxides, or
NOx
and sulfur dioxide, or
SO2,
emissions, commencing in 2009 and 2010 respectively, and has
also promulgated regulations requiring reductions in mercury
emissions from coal-fired electric generating units, commencing
in 2010 with more substantial reductions in 2018. These
regulatory programs are currently subject to litigation and
reconsideration by the USEPA, which could affect the timing of
our future capital projects. See Business
Environmental Matters U.S. Federal Environmental
Initiatives Air. Moreover, certain of the states in
which we operate have promulgated air pollution control
regulations which are more stringent than existing and proposed
federal regulations. Ongoing public concerns about emissions of
SO2,
NOx,
mercury and carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from power
plants have resulted in proposed laws and regulations at the
federal, state and regional levels that, if they were to take
effect substantially as proposed, would likely apply to our
operations. For example, we could incur substantial costs
pursuant to the proposed multi-state carbon cap-and-trade
program known as the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, or
RGGI, which would apply to the facilities in our Northeast
region. A model rule for implementation of RGGI is expected to
be released within the next few months. See Business
Environmental Matters Regional U.S. Environmental
Regulatory Initiatives.
Significant capital expenditures may be required to keep our
facilities compliant with environmental laws and regulations,
and if it is not economical to make those capital expenditures
then we may need to retire or mothball facilities, or restrict
or modify our operations to comply with more stringent standards.
Certain environmental laws impose strict, joint and several
liability for costs required to clean up and restore sites where
hazardous substances have been disposed or otherwise released.
We are generally responsible for all liabilities associated with
the environmental condition of our power generation plants,
including any soil or groundwater contamination that may be
present, regardless of when the liabilities arose and whether
the liabilities are known or unknown, or arose from the
activities of our predecessors or third parties. We are
currently subject to remediation obligations at a number of our
facilities. See Business Environmental Matters
Domestic Site Remediation Matters.
|
|
|
The value of our assets is subject to the nature and
extent of decommissioning and remediation obligations applicable
to us. |
Our facilities and related properties may become subject to
decommissioning and/or site remediation obligations that may
require material unplanned expenditures or otherwise materially
affect the value of those assets. The closure or modification of
any of our facilities, especially with respect to STP, could
lead to substantial liabilities, including related to the
cleanup of any contamination that occurred during the
facilitys operation. While we believe that we meet, or are
performing, all site remediation obligations currently
applicable to our assets (including through the provision of
various forms of financial assurance at certain facilities at
which we are not currently required to perform remediation),
more onerous obligations often apply to sites where a plant is
to be dismantled, which could negatively affect our ability to
economically undertake power redevelopments or alternate uses at
existing power plant sites. Further, laws and regulations may
change to impose material additional decommissioning and
remediation obligations on us in the future, negatively
impacting the value of our assets and/or our ability to
undertake redevelopment projects.
|
|
|
Our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be adversely impacted by strikes or work
stoppages by our unionized employees. |
As of September 30, 2005, after giving pro forma effect to
the Acquisition, approximately 46.8% of the combined
companys employees at its U.S. generation plants
would have been covered by collective bargaining agreements, and
774 employees of the combined companys plants in Texas are
covered by a single collective
S-22
bargaining agreement that expires in September 2006. In the
event that our union employees strike, participate in a work
stoppage or slowdown or engage in other forms of labor strife or
disruption, we would be responsible for procuring replacement
labor or we could experience reduced power generation or
outages. Our ability to procure such labor is uncertain.
Strikes, work stoppages or the inability to negotiate future
collective bargaining agreements on favorable terms could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
|
|
|
Changes in technology may impair the value of our power
plants. |
Research and development activities are ongoing to provide
alternative and more efficient technologies to produce power,
including fuel cells, clean coal and coal gasification,
microturbines, photovoltaic (solar) cells and improvements
in traditional technologies and equipment, such as more
efficient gas turbines. Advances in these or other technologies
could reduce the costs of power production to a level below what
we have currently forecasted, which could adversely affect our
revenue, results of operations or competitive position.
|
|
|
Acts of terrorism could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. |
Our generation facilities and the facilities of third parties on
which they rely may be targets of terrorist activities, as well
as events occurring in response to or in connection with them,
that could cause environmental repercussions and/or result in
full or partial disruption of their ability to generate,
transmit, transport or distribute electricity or natural gas.
Strategic targets, such as energy-related facilities, may be at
greater risk of future terrorist activities than other domestic
targets. Any such environmental repercussions or disruption
could result in a significant decrease in revenues or
significant reconstruction or remediation costs, which could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
|
|
|
Our international investments are subject to additional
risks that our U.S. investments do not have. |
We have investments in power projects in Australia, Germany and
Brazil. International investments are subject to risks and
uncertainties relating to the political, social and economic
structures of the countries in which we invest. Risks
specifically related to our investments in international
projects may include:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency valuation; |
|
|
|
currency inconvertibility; |
|
|
|
expropriation and confiscatory taxation; |
|
|
|
restrictions on the repatriation of capital; and |
|
|
|
approval requirements and governmental policies limiting returns
to foreign investors. |
|
|
|
Texas Gencos plants are the subject of a number of
lawsuits filed by a large number of individuals who claim injury
due to exposure to asbestos while working at sites along the
Texas Gulf Coast, and NRG is also subject to asbestos-related
claims with respect to certain of its facilities. |
Many of Texas Gencos plants have been subject to personal
injury claims arising out of alleged exposure to asbestos. Most
of the claimants who have brought such claims have been
third-party workers who participated in the construction,
renovation or repair of various industrial plants, including
power plants. While many of the claimants have never worked at
or near Texas Gencos plants, some of the claimants have
worked at locations owned by Texas Genco. While Texas Genco has
been dismissed from many of these lawsuits without having to
make any payment to claimants, Texas Genco has incurred and
expects to continue to incur settlement costs associated with
these claims. NRG is also subject to claims for asbestos
exposure in certain of its facilities, as well as claims for
indemnity from previous owners of those facilities. We defend
against these claims aggressively, and, thus, we have incurred
and expect to continue to incur defense costs as a result of
such claims. For further discussion of such claims, see
Business Legal Proceedings.
S-23
If asbestos-related claims against us rise significantly, our
liability may be substantial. Moreover, if insurance currently
available for contribution to the payment of asbestos
liabilities becomes unavailable (through insurer insolvencies,
coverage disputes, changes in law or otherwise), asbestos
liabilities could impact our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
|
|
|
Our high level of indebtedness could adversely affect our
ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations,
expose us to the risk of increased interest rates, make it more
difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our
indebtedness and limit our ability to react to changes in the
economy or our industry. |
Our substantial debt could have important consequences for you,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to general economic and industry
conditions; |
|
|
|
requiring a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations
to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our
indebtedness, therefore reducing our ability to pay dividends to
holders of our preferred or common stock or to use our cash flow
to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future business
opportunities; |
|
|
|
limiting our ability to enter into long-term power sales or fuel
purchases which require credit support; |
|
|
|
exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates because
certain of our borrowings, including borrowings under our senior
secured credit facilities, are, and under our new senior secured
credit facility will be, at variable rates of interest; |
|
|
|
placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; |
|
|
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working
capital, including collateral postings, capital expenditures,
debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or
other purposes; and |
|
|
|
limiting our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and
placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors who have less debt. |
The indenture for the senior notes contains, and our new credit
facility will contain, financial and other restrictive covenants
that will limit our ability to engage in activities that may be
in our long-term best interests. Our failure to comply with
those covenants could result in an event of default which, if
not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all of
our borrowed indebtedness.
In addition, our ability to arrange financing, either at the
corporate level or at a non-recourse project-level subsidiary,
and the costs of such capital are dependent on numerous factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
general economic and capital market conditions; |
|
|
|
credit availability from banks and other financial institutions; |
|
|
|
investor confidence in us, our partners and the regional
wholesale power markets; |
|
|
|
our financial performance and the financial performance of our
subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
our levels of indebtedness and compliance with covenants in debt
agreements; |
|
|
|
maintenance of acceptable credit ratings; |
|
|
|
cash flow; and |
|
|
|
provisions of tax and securities laws that may impact raising
capital. |
We may not be successful in obtaining additional capital for
these or other reasons. The failure to obtain additional capital
from time to time may have a material adverse effect on our
business and operations.
S-24
Risks Related to the Acquisition
|
|
|
We may not be able to realize the anticipated benefits
from the Acquisition. |
The success of the Acquisition will depend largely on NRGs
ability to consolidate and effectively integrate Texas
Gencos assets, operations and employees into NRG. The
integration will require substantial time and attention from our
management. If the integration takes longer or is more complex
or expensive than anticipated, or if we cannot operate our
combined business as effectively as we anticipate, our operating
performance and profitability could be materially adversely
affected.
Texas Gencos power generation assets operate in the ERCOT
market, a market in which NRG does not currently operate.
Accordingly, we are dependent upon Texas Gencos existing
managers and employees to manage those assets, and the loss of
key Texas Genco managers or employees could adversely affect our
business.
In addition, as a result of the Acquisition, we have assumed all
of Texas Gencos liabilities. After the Acquisition, we may
learn additional information about Texas Gencos business
that adversely affects us, such as unknown or contingent
liabilities, issues relating to internal controls over financial
reporting and issues relating to compliance with applicable laws.
|
|
|
Because the historical and pro forma financial information
incorporated by reference or included elsewhere in this
prospectus supplement may not be representative of our results
as a combined company or capital structure after the
Acquisition, and NRGs and Texas Gencos historical
financial information are not comparable to their current
financial information, you have limited financial information on
which to evaluate us, NRG, Texas Genco and your investment
decision. |
NRGs financial statements prior to December 5, 2003
are not comparable to its financial statements after that date.
As a result of NRGs emergence from bankruptcy, it is
operating its business with a new capital structure, and is
subject to Fresh Start reporting requirements prescribed by
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
As required by Fresh Start reporting, assets and liabilities as
of December 6, 2003 were recorded at fair value, with the
enterprise value being determined in connection with the
reorganization.
Texas Genco did not exist prior to July 19, 2004, and Texas
Genco and its subsidiaries had no operations and no material
activities until December 15, 2004 when Texas Genco
acquired its gas and coal-fired assets. Consequently, Texas
Gencos historical financial statements are not comparable
to its current financial statements.
NRG and Texas Genco have been operating as separate companies
prior to the Acquisition. We have had no prior history as a
combined entity and our operations have not previously been
managed on a combined basis. Preparing the pro forma financial
information contained in this prospectus supplement involved
making several assumptions, such as the makeup of our capital
structure after the consummation of the Financing Transactions.
These assumptions may prove inaccurate. Therefore, the
historical financial statements and pro forma financial
statements incorporated by reference or presented in this
prospectus supplement may not reflect what our results of
operations, financial position and cash flows would have been
had we operated on a combined basis and may not be indicative of
what our results of operations, financial position and cash
flows will be in the future.
As a result, the historical and pro forma financial information
incorporated by reference or included elsewhere in this
prospectus supplement is of limited relevance to an investor in
this offering. See Selected Consolidated Financial
Information of NRG and Selected Consolidated
Financial Information of Texas Genco. See also
Risks Related to the Offering If NRG is unable
to raise sufficient proceeds through other Financing
Transactions described elsewhere in this prospectus supplement,
NRG may draw down on a bridge loan facility in order to close
the Acquisition which would significantly increase our
indebtedness. If NRG elects not to consummate the financing
under the bridge loan facility, NRG may seek alternative sources
of financing for the Acquisition, the terms of which are unknown
to us and could limit our ability to operate our business.
S-25
Risks Related to the Offering
|
|
|
There can be no assurance that the Acquisition will be
consummated in accordance with the anticipated timing or at all,
and the closing of this offering is not conditioned on the
consummation of the Acquisition. If the Acquisition is not
consummated, NRGs common stock will not reflect any actual
or anticipated interest in Texas Genco, and if the Acquisition
is delayed, this interest will not be reflected during the
period of delay. |
Although NRG expects to close the Acquisition in or about the
first week of February 2006, there can be no assurance that the
Acquisition will be completed in accordance with the anticipated
timing or at all. In order to consummate the Acquisition, NRG
and Texas Genco must obtain certain regulatory and other
approvals and consents in a timely manner. If these approvals or
consents are not received, or they are not received on terms
that satisfy the conditions set forth in the Acquisition
Agreement, then NRG and/or Texas Genco will not be obligated to
complete the Acquisition. Also, NRG and/or Texas Genco may not
receive these approvals or consents by the first week of
February 2006, the current anticipated timing for closing the
Acquisition. The Acquisition Agreement also contains customary
and other closing conditions, which may not be satisfied or
waived. In addition, under circumstances specified in the
Acquisition Agreement, NRG or Texas Genco may terminate the
Acquisition Agreement.
The closing of this offering is not conditioned on the
consummation of the Acquisition. Therefore, upon the closing of
this offering, you will become a holder of NRGs common
stock irrespective of whether the Acquisition is consummated or
delayed. If the Acquisition is not completed, NRGs common
stock that you have purchased in this offering, will not reflect
any interest in Texas Genco, and if the Acquisition is delayed,
this interest will not be reflected during the period of delay.
If this offering is consummated and the Acquisition does not
occur, your expected earnings per share of our common stock will
be significantly reduced. Also, the price of NRGs common
stock may decline to the extent that the current market price of
NRGs common stock reflects a market assumption that the
Acquisition will be consummated and that NRG will realize
certain anticipated benefits of the Acquisition. See also below
The price of our common stock may fluctuate
significantly, which may make it difficult for you to resell the
common stock when you want or at prices you find
attractive. In addition, NRGs business may be harmed
to the extent that customers, suppliers and others believe that
NRG cannot effectively compete in the marketplace without Texas
Genco, or otherwise remain uncertain about NRG. NRG will be
required to pay significant costs incurred in connection with
the Acquisition, including legal, accounting, financial advisory
and other costs, whether or not the Acquisition is completed.
The occurrence of any of these events individually or in
combination could have a material adverse effect on NRGs
business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly,
which may make it difficult for you to resell the common stock
when you want or at prices you find attractive. |
The price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange
constantly changes. We expect that the market price of our
common stock will continue to fluctuate. Holders of our common
stock will be subject to the risk of volatility and depressed
prices.
Our common stock price can fluctuate as a result of a variety of
factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors
include:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to consummate the Acquisition in accordance with the
anticipated timing or at all; |
|
|
|
new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws
or regulations applicable to our business; |
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles; |
|
|
|
our inability to raise additional capital; |
|
|
|
sales of common stock by us or members of our management team; |
|
|
|
quarterly variations in our operating results; |
S-26
|
|
|
|
|
operating results that vary from the expectations of management,
securities analysts and investors; |
|
|
|
changes in expectations as to our future financial performance,
including financial estimates by securities analysts and
investors; |
|
|
|
developments generally affecting our industry; |
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts,
acquisitions, joint marketing relationships, joint ventures or
capital commitments; |
|
|
|
announcements by third parties of significant claims or
proceedings against us; |
|
|
|
changes in our dividend policy; |
|
|
|
future sales of our equity or equity-linked securities; and |
|
|
|
general domestic and international economic conditions. |
In addition, the stock market in general has experienced extreme
volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating
performance of a particular company. These broad market
fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common
stock.
|
|
|
Our ability to pay dividends may be limited. |
The terms of our existing senior secured credit facility and the
indenture for the Second Priority Notes restrict, and we expect
the terms of our new senior credit facility and the indenture
governing the New Senior Notes to restrict, our ability to pay
dividends to the holders of our common stock. In addition, under
the terms of our outstanding preferred stock, including the
mandatory convertible preferred stock offered as part of the
Financing Transactions, we are restricted from paying any cash
dividend on our common stock if we are not current in our
dividend payments with respect to such preferred stock. If we
issue Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock to the Sellers
pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, we will be prohibited
from paying dividends on our common stock so long as any shares
of Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock are outstanding. In the
future, we may agree to further restrictions on our ability to
pay dividends. In addition, to maintain our credit ratings, we
may be limited in our ability to pay dividends so that we can
maintain an appropriate level of debt. Our future dividend
policy depends on earnings, financial condition, liquidity,
capital requirements and other factors. There is no guarantee
that we will pay dividends on shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
If NRG is unable to raise sufficient proceeds through
other Financing Transactions described elsewhere in this
prospectus supplement, NRG may draw down on a bridge loan
facility in order to close the Acquisition which would
significantly increase our indebtedness. If NRG elects not to
consummate the financing under the bridge loan facility, NRG may
seek alternative sources of financing for the Acquisition, the
terms of which are unknown to us and could limit our ability to
operate our business. |
The offering of the common stock forms part of a larger
financing plan for the Acquisition described elsewhere in this
prospectus supplement. See The Acquisition The
Financing Transactions. Concurrently with this offering,
NRG intends to conduct offerings of its mandatory convertible
preferred stock and New Senior Notes. In addition, NRG intends
to enter into a new senior secured credit facility at or prior
to the Acquisition that will replace its existing senior secured
credit facility. NRG intends to use initial borrowings under its
new senior secured credit facility, together with the net
proceeds from this offering and the offerings of mandatory
convertible preferred stock and New Senior Notes, to finance the
Acquisition and to repay certain of its and Texas Gencos
outstanding indebtedness. See Use of Proceeds.
NRGs obligations under the Acquisition Agreement are not
conditioned upon the consummation of any or all of the Financing
Transactions. NRG has entered into the commitment letter with
the bridge lenders pursuant to which the bridge lenders have
committed to fund NRGs new senior secured credit facility
and to provide, subject to certain conditions, the additional
financing required for the Acquisition through a
$5.1 billion bridge loan facility in the event that
sufficient proceeds are not raised from this offering, the
mandatory convertible
S-27
preferred stock offering and/or the New Senior Notes offering.
See Description of Certain Indebtedness Bridge Loan
Facility.
In the event that NRG is unable to raise sufficient proceeds
through the consummation of the New Senior Notes offering and/or
the mandatory convertible preferred stock offering, NRG may draw
down on the bridge loan facility, in whole or in part, in order
to finance the Acquisition. No assurances can be given that the
terms of the bridge loan facility on the draw down date would
not vary from the existing terms of such facility on the date of
this prospectus supplement. See Description of Certain
Indebtedness Bridge Loan Facility. In the event of
such draw down, we would be significantly more highly leveraged,
which means we will have a larger amount of indebtedness in
relation to our equity (deficit). Our interest expense would
significantly increase and require us to dedicate a substantial
portion of our cash flow from operations to payments in respect
of our outstanding indebtedness, thereby reducing the
availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, including
collateral postings, capital expenditures and other general
corporate expenditures. Our substantial indebtedness could
adversely affect our financial condition.
In the event that NRG does not consummate the mandatory
convertible stock offering and the New Senior Notes offering as
currently contemplated and elects not to consummate the
financing under the bridge loan facility, it could seek
alternative sources of financing for the Acquisition, which may
include, among other alternatives, the issuance in part of
senior secured debt securities or borrowing in part on a senior
secured basis. This could further exacerbate the risks
associated with our substantial leverage. There can be no
assurance as to the terms on which NRG would issue these senior
secured debt securities or borrow funds. We are unable to
predict the interest rate payable on any such debt or give any
assurance that the terms would not restrict our financial
flexibility or limit our ability to operate our business.
|
|
|
Our corporate documents and Delaware law contain
provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a change in
control of our company even if some stockholders might consider
such a development favorable, which may adversely affect the
price of our common stock. |
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated by-laws may discourage,
delay or prevent a merger or acquisition involving us that our
stockholders may consider favorable. For example, our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes our board
of directors to issue shares of preferred stock to which special
rights are attached, including voting and dividend rights. With
these rights, preferred stockholders could make it more
difficult for a third party to acquire us. In addition, our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for a
staggered board of directors, whereby directors serve for
three-year terms, with approximately one third of the directors
coming up for reelection each year. Having a staggered board of
directors would make it more difficult for a third party to
obtain control of our board of directors through a proxy
contest, which may be a necessary step in an acquisition of us
that is not favored by our board of directors.
We are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Under
these provisions, if anyone becomes an interested
stockholder, we may not enter into a business
combination with that person for three years without
special approval, which could discourage a third party from
making a takeover offer and could delay or prevent a change of
control. For purposes of Section 203, interested
stockholder means, generally, someone owning 15% or more
of our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate of ours that
owned 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock during the
past three years, subject to certain exceptions as described in
Section 203.
Under our existing senior secured credit facility and the new
senior secured credit facility which we expect will be in effect
after closing the Acquisition, a change of control is an event
of default. Upon the occurrence of a change in control, the
holders of the New Senior Notes will have the right, subject to
certain conditions, to require us to repurchase their notes at a
price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and
unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, to the date of
repurchase.
S-28
|
|
|
Shares eligible for future issuance or sale may cause our
common stock price to decline, which may negatively impact your
investment. |
Issuances or sales of substantial numbers of additional shares
of our common stock, including in connection with future
acquisitions, if any, or the perception that such issuances or
sales could occur, may cause prevailing market prices for shares
of our common stock to decline and may adversely affect our
ability to raise additional capital in the financial markets at
a time and price favorable to us. As of the date of this
prospectus supplement, our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation provides that we have authority to issue up to
500,000,000 shares of our common stock. As of
January 3, 2006, 100,048,676 shares of our common
stock were issued, 80,701,888 shares of our common stock
were outstanding and 19,346,788 shares of our common stock
were issued and held in treasury. Also as of such date, there
were 4,000,000 shares of our common stock reserved for
issuance under stock incentive plans or pursuant to individual
option grants or stock awards. After giving effect to the
Financing Transactions, we will have 101,556,945 million
shares of common stock outstanding (104,685,204 million
shares of common stock outstanding if the underwriters in this
offering exercise their over-allotment option in full).
In connection with the Acquisition, we are issuing to the
Sellers shares of our common stock valued at approximately
1.6 billion on a pro forma basis. The shares of common
stock issued to the Sellers are subject to a 180 day
lock-up period following the closing date of the Acquisition. If
the restrictions under the lock-up agreements are waived or
terminated, or upon expiration of the lock-up period, such
shares held by the Sellers will be available for sale into the
market at that time, subject only to applicable securities laws,
rules and regulations. These sales or a perception that these
sales may occur could reduce the market price for our common
stock.
Concurrently with this offering, we are offering to sell to the
public 2,000,000 shares of our mandatory convertible
preferred stock (or 2,300,000 shares if the underwriters
exercise their over-allotment option to purchase additional
shares in full) and an additional 8,271,200 to
10,256,400 shares of common stock will be issuable upon
conversion of the mandatory convertible preferred stock (or an
additional 1,240,680 to 1,538,460 shares of common stock if
the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full).
We will reserve for issuance the maximum number of shares of our
common stock issuable upon conversion of the mandatory
convertible preferred stock. See Description of Capital
Stock Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock.
S-29
THE ACQUISITION
The Acquisition
On September 30, 2005, NRG entered into the Acquisition
Agreement with Texas Genco and the Sellers. Pursuant to the
Acquisition Agreement, NRG agreed to purchase all of the
outstanding equity interests in Texas Genco for a total pro
forma purchase price of approximately $6.121 billion that
includes the assumption of approximately $2.7 billion of
indebtedness. The purchase price is subject to adjustment, and
includes an equity component valued at up to $2.0 billion
based on a price per share of $45.37 of NRGs common stock
issued to the Sellers, and an average price per share of $40.73
for the Other Consideration to the Sellers. As a result of the
Acquisition, Texas Genco will become a wholly-owned subsidiary
of NRG.
The closing of this offering is not conditioned on the
consummation of the Acquisition. While we expect that the
Acquisition will be consummated in or about the first week of
February 2006, no assurance can be given that the Acquisition
will be completed in accordance with the anticipated timing or
at all. See Risk Factors Risks Related to the
Offering There can be no assurance that the Acquisition
will be consummated in accordance with the anticipated timing or
at all, and the closing of this offering is not conditioned on
the consummation of the Acquisition. If the Acquisition is not
consummated, NRGs common stock will not reflect any actual
or anticipated interest in Texas Genco, and if the Acquisition
is delayed, this interest will not be reflected during the
period of delay.
|
|
|
Certain Terms and Conditions of the Acquisition
Agreement |
Of the approximately $6.121 billion payable to the Sellers
upon consummation of the Acquisition, NRG will pay
$4.399 billion in cash, subject to adjustment, and issue a
minimum of 35,406,320 shares of NRGs common stock. The
remaining consideration is to be comprised of an additional
9,038,125 shares of common stock, or at NRGs election, the
equivalent in the form of common stock, additional cash or
shares of a new series of NRGs Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, or any combination of the foregoing. If issued,
the aggregate liquidation preference of the Cumulative Preferred
Stock will be determined by reference to the average price of
NRGs common stock over a 20 trading day period prior
to the closing of the Acquisition, which on a pro forma basis is
$40.73. NRG has elected to pay this amount in cash. The purchase
price payable by NRG is subject to adjustment based on the level
of Texas Gencos working capital, the amount of Texas
Gencos indebtedness and the amount of Texas Gencos
cash and cash equivalents on hand, all as of the closing date.
The Acquisition Agreement contains customary terms and
conditions, including representations and warranties of NRG,
Texas Genco and the Sellers and covenants of NRG and Texas Genco
with respect to the conduct of their businesses prior to the
closing of the Acquisition. Pending closing of the Acquisition,
Texas Genco and NRG are obligated to conduct their businesses in
the ordinary course of business, to preserve their business,
assets, properties and relationships, and to refrain from
certain activities without prior written consent of the other
party, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
The obligations of NRG, on the one hand, and Texas Genco and the
Sellers, on the other, to consummate the Acquisition are subject
to the satisfaction or waiver of various conditions, including:
the other party or parties having performed their agreements,
covenants and obligations required by the Acquisition Agreement
in all material respects and having delivered certain
certificates and other documents, the representations and
warranties of the other party or parties being true and correct
on the date of the Acquisition Agreement and the closing date
(except for inaccuracies that would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the
Acquisition Agreement)), no Law or Order (each as defined in the
Acquisition Agreement) being in effect on the closing date that
would prohibit the consummation of the acquisition or related
transactions, no Material Adverse Effect on the other party
having occurred since June 30, 2005, the parties having
received all consents and approvals of, and made all filings
with various governmental authorities necessary to consummate
the acquisition and related transactions, including with respect
to the NRC and FERC, and any applicable terminations or
expirations of waiting periods having
S-30
occurred, including with respect to the Hart Scott Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act, or the HSRA. On November 10,
2005, NRG was notified by the Federal Trade Commissions
Premerger Notification Office that early termination of the
applicable waiting period under the HSRA was granted with
respect to the Acquisition. On December 27, 2005, FERC
granted approval for the Acquisition. On January 13, 2006,
NRG and Texas Genco received approval from the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission to transfer indirect ownership of the
44 percent interest in the South Texas Project Electric
Generation Station. The Acquisition Agreement does not contain
any financing condition.
The Acquisition Agreement may be terminated upon the occurrence
of certain events, including at any time before closing by
mutual written agreement of NRG and the Seller Representatives
(as defined in the Acquisition Agreement). NRG or the Seller
Representatives may terminate the Acquisition Agreement if the
Acquisition has not been consummated within nine months of the
date of the Acquisition Agreement (subject to certain provisions
for extension), upon an uncured material breach by the other
party or parties of any of the covenants, agreements or
representations or warranties in the Acquisition Agreement if
such breach would cause a failure of any of the conditions to
the obligations of NRG or the Sellers, as the case may be, to
consummate the Acquisition, upon an Order by a Governmental
Authority (each as defined in the Acquisition Agreement)
preventing the consummation of the Acquisition or the related
transactions or the failure by a Governmental Authority to issue
certain required approvals for the Acquisition or related
transactions, which failure becomes final and non-appealable, or
if the other party has incurred a Material Adverse Effect (as
defined in the Acquisition Agreement) on the other party.
The Financing Transactions
The offering of common stock forms part of a larger financing
plan for the Acquisition described elsewhere in this prospectus
supplement. Concurrently with this offering, NRG intends to
offer, by means of separate prospectus supplements
(i) $500 million of its mandatory convertible
preferred stock and (ii) $3.6 billion of New Senior
Notes. See Description of Capital Stock Mandatory
Convertible Preferred Stock and Description of
Certain IndebtednessNew Senior Notes. This offering,
the mandatory convertible preferred stock offering and the New
Senior Notes offering are expected to be consummated at or prior
to the completion of the Acquisition. The closing of this
offering will not necessarily be contemporaneous with the
closing of the New Senior Notes offering and/or the closing of
the mandatory convertible preferred stock offering. The net
proceeds of the offering of the New Senior Notes (after payment
of underwriting discounts and commissions) will be placed into
an escrow account held by the escrow agent until the
consummation of the Acquisition.
In addition, NRG intends to enter into a new senior secured
credit facility at or prior to the closing of the Acquisition
that will replace its existing senior secured credit facility.
See Description of Certain Indebtedness New Senior
Secured Credit Facility. Concurrently with this offering,
NRG is conducting a cash tender offer and consent solicitation
with respect to (i) all of its outstanding Second Priority
Notes, and (ii) all of Texas Gencos outstanding
Unsecured Senior Notes. The completion of the Acquisition is not
conditioned on the completion of the tender offer or receipt of
the consents for either the Second Priority Notes or Texas
Gencos Unsecured Senior Notes. The completion of the
tender offer for the Second Priority Notes and Texas
Gencos Unsecured Senior Notes is conditioned on the
completion of the Acquisition. However, NRG can waive this
condition in the case of the tender offer and consent
solicitation for the Second Priority Notes. See
Summary Recent Developments Tender Offers and
Consent Solicitations.
NRG intends to use initial borrowings under its new senior
secured credit facility, together with the net proceeds from
this offering, the offerings of mandatory convertible preferred
stock and New Senior Notes and cash on hand (i) to finance
the Acquisition, (ii) to repurchase NRGs outstanding
Second Priority Notes, (iii) to repurchase Texas
Gencos outstanding Unsecured Senior Notes, (iv) to
repay amounts outstanding under NRGs existing senior
secured credit facility and Texas Gencos existing senior
secured credit facility, (v) for ongoing credit needs of
the combined company, including replacement of existing letters
of credit and (vi) to pay related premiums, fees and
expenses. In the event that NRG does not consummate the
Acquisition, NRG intends to use the net proceeds from this
offering for general corporate purposes. See Use of
Proceeds.
S-31
The closing of this offering is not contingent on the closing of
the mandatory convertible preferred stock offering, the closing
of the New Senior Notes offering, the effectiveness of the new
senior secured credit facility, the completion of the tender
offers and receipt of the consents in connection with the
outstanding tender offers for NRGs and Texas Gencos
notes or the consummation of the Acquisition. See Risk
Factors Risks Related to the Offering There can be
no assurance that the Acquisition will be consummated in
accordance with the anticipated timing or at all, and the
closing of this offering is not conditioned on the consummation
of the Acquisition. If the Acquisition is not consummated,
NRGs common stock will not reflect any actual or
anticipated interest in Texas Genco, and if the Acquisition is
delayed, this interest will not be reflected during the period
of delay. NRGs obligations under the Acquisition
Agreement are not conditioned upon the consummation of any or
all of the Financing Transactions.
NRG has entered into the commitment letter with the bridge
lenders pursuant to which the bridge lenders have committed to
fund NRGs new senior secured credit facility and to
provide, subject to certain conditions, the additional financing
required for the Acquisition through a $5.1 billion bridge
loan facility in the event that sufficient funds are not raised
from this offering, the mandatory convertible preferred stock
and/or the New Senior Notes offering. See Description of
Certain Indebtedness Bridge Loan Facility. In the
event that NRG is unable to raise sufficient proceeds through
the consummation of this offering, the mandatory convertible
preferred stock offering and/or the New Senior Notes offering,
NRG may draw down on the bridge loan facility, in whole or in
part, in order to finance the Acquisition. In the event that NRG
does not consummate the mandatory convertible preferred stock
offering and the New Senior Notes offering as currently
contemplated and elects not to consummate the financing under
the bridge loan facility, it could seek alternative sources of
financing for the Acquisition, which may include, among other
alternatives, the issuance in part of senior secured debt
securities or borrowing in part on a senior secured basis.
S-32
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds of this offering, after giving
effect to underwriting discounts, commissions and estimated
expenses payable by us, will be approximately
$985.1 million. We intend to use the net proceeds from the
common stock offering and the offerings of mandatory convertible
preferred stock and New Senior Notes, together with initial
borrowings under our new senior secured credit facility and cash
on hand, (i) to finance the Acquisition, (ii) to
repurchase NRGs outstanding Second Priority Notes,
(iii) to repurchase Texas Gencos outstanding
Unsecured Senior Notes, (iv) to repay amounts outstanding
under NRGs existing senior secured credit facility and
Texas Gencos existing senior secured credit facility,
(v) for ongoing credit needs of the combined company,
including replacement of existing letters of credit and
(vi) to pay related premiums, fees and expenses. In the
event that NRG does not consummate the Acquisition, NRG intends
to use net proceeds from this offering for general corporate
purposes. The closing of this offering is not conditioned on the
consummation of the Acquisition.
NRG has agreed to acquire Texas Genco for a total pro forma
purchase price of approximately $6.121 billion, including
an equity component valued at approximately $2.0 billion.
In addition, NRG will assume approximately $2.7 billion of
Texas Gencos debt. Before giving effect to the Acquisition
and Financing Transactions, as of September 30, 2005, NRG
had (i) $1.08 billion of Second Priority Notes outstanding,
which provide for cash interest at 8.0% per annum payable
semi-annually and (ii) $876.6 million of outstanding
indebtedness under its amended and restated credit facility,
which consisted of (a) $446.6 million in term loans
outstanding, which term loans provide for interest at a rate of
LIBOR (4.02% at September 30, 2005) plus 187.5 basis points
payable quarterly and mature on December 24, 2011, (b)
$80.0 million in principal amount outstanding under the
revolving credit facility, which provides for interest at a rate
of LIBOR (3.83% at September 30, 2005) plus 2.5% and
matures on December 24, 2007 and (c) $350.0 million
outstanding under the funded letter of credit facility, which
provide for a participation fee of 1.875%, a deposit fee of
0.10%, and an issuance fee of 0.25% and matures on
December 24, 2011. In addition, before giving effect to the
Acquisition and Financing Transactions, as of September 30,
2005 (i) Texas Genco had $1.125 billion of Unsecured
Senior Notes outstanding, which provide for cash interest at
6.875% per annum payable semiannually and (ii) Texas Genco
had $1,614 million in term loans outstanding under its
existing senior secured credit facility, which term loans
provide for interest at a rate of 5.94% (as of
September 30, 2005) payable at least quarterly and mature
in December 2011. See The Acquisition and
Description of Certain Indebtedness.
Sources and Uses of Funds
The following table sets forth the expected sources and uses of
funds in connection with the Acquisition on a pro forma basis
giving effect to the Transactions as if they had occurred on
September 30, 2005. No assurances can be given that the
information in the following table will not change depending on
the nature of our financings and/or whether the Acquisition will
be consummated in accordance with the anticipated timing or at
all. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to the
AcquisitionBecause the historical and pro forma financial
information incorporated by reference or included elsewhere in
this prospectus supplement may not be representative of our
results as a combined company or capital structure after the
Acquisition, and NRGs and Texas Gencos historical
financial information are not comparable to their current
financial information, you have limited financial information on
which to evaluate us, NRG, Texas Genco and your investment
decision and Risk FactorsRisks Related to the
OfferingIf NRG is unable to raise sufficient proceeds
through other Financing Transactions described elsewhere in this
prospectus supplement, NRG may draw down on a bridge loan
facility in order to close the Acquisition which would
significantly increase our indebtedness. If NRG elects not to
consummate the financing under the bridge loan facility, NRG may
seek alternative sources of financing for the Acquisition, the
terms of which are unknown to us and could limit our ability to
operate our business and Risk FactorsRisks
Related to the OfferingThere can be no assurance that the
Acquisition will be consummated in accordance with the
anticipated timing or at all, and the closing of this offering
is not conditioned on the consummation of the Acquisition. If
the Acquisition is not consummated,
S-33
NRGs common stock will not reflect any actual or
anticipated interest in Texas Genco, and if the Acquisition is
delayed, this interest will not be reflected during the period
of delay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
Sources(1) |
|
(in millions) | |
|
|
| |
Gross proceeds of common stock offering
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,016 |
|
|
New senior secured term loan facility
|
|
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
Cash released from canceling existing funded letter of credit
facility
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
Gross proceeds of mandatory convertible preferred stock offering
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
Common stock consideration to be issued to Sellers
|
|
|
|
|
1,606 (2 |
) |
|
Gross proceeds of 2014 fixed rate notes offering
|
|
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
Gross proceeds of 2016 fixed rate notes offering
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
NRGs cash on hand
|
|
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
Uses |
|
(in millions) | |
|
|
| |
Purchase price less acquisition
costs(2)
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,005 |
|
Texas Gencos cash on hand to reduce consideration
|
|
|
|
|
(222 |
) |
Refinancing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of NRGs existing credit facilities
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of Texas Gencos existing credit facilities
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total repayment of existing credit facilities
|
|
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
Repurchase of NRGs Second Priority Notes
|
|
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
Repurchase of Texas Gencos Unsecured Senior Notes
|
|
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
Accrued interest for NRG and Texas Genco outstanding debt
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
Estimated underwriting commissions, tender offer premiums, fees
and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
NRG has entered into the commitment letter with the bridge
lenders pursuant to which the bridge lenders have committed to
fund NRGs new senior secured credit facility and to
provide, subject to certain conditions, the additional financing
required for the Acquisition through a $5.1 billion bridge
loan facility in the event that this offering, the mandatory
convertible preferred stock offering and/or the New Senior Notes
offering are not consummated. In the event that NRG is unable to
raise sufficient proceeds through the consummation of this
offering, the mandatory convertible preferred stock offering
and/or the New Senior Notes offering, NRG may draw down on the
bridge loan facility, in whole or in part, in order to finance
the Acquisition. In the event that NRG does not consummate the
mandatory convertible preferred stock offering and the New
Senior Notes offering as currently contemplated and elects not
to consummate the financing under the bridge loan facility, it
could seek alternative sources of financing for the Acquisition,
which may include, among other alternatives, the issuance in
part of senior secured debt securities or borrowing in part on a
senior secured basis. |
|
(2) |
The common stock component of the consideration for the
Acquisition is based on a fair value of $45.37 per share of
NRGs common stock and the Other Consideration is valued
based on an average common stock price of $40.73, as prescribed
in the Acquisition Agreement. This is because the foregoing
table is based on a pro forma closing date of Acquisition of
September 30, 2005. To the extent NRGs common stock
price for purposes of the equity component, and Texas
Gencos cash on hand, is different at closing of the
Acquisition, this amount and the purchase price for the
Acquisition will be adjusted accordingly. |
S-34
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth NRGs consolidated
capitalization as of September 30, 2005 on an actual
historical basis and on a combined pro forma cumulative as
adjusted basis to reflect the (i) sale of Audrain;
(ii) the refinancing of NRGs debt structure;
(iii) the remaining Financing Transactions and subsequent
Acquisition; and (iv) the acquisition of the remaining 50%
ownership interest in WCP Holdings and sale of our 50%
ownership interest in Rocky Road, as if these transactions were
consummated on September 30, 2005. The table below should
be read in conjunction with The Acquisition,
Use of Proceeds and the consolidated financial
statements and the related notes thereto included in or
incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement and
the accompanying prospectus. No assurances can be given that the
information in the following table will not change depending on
the nature of our financings. See Risk Factors Risks
Related to the Acquisition Because the historical and pro
forma financial information incorporated by reference or
included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement may not be
representative of our results as a combined company or capital
structure after the Acquisition, and NRGs and Texas
Gencos historical financial information are not comparable
to their current financial information, you have limited
financial information on which to evaluate us, NRG, Texas Genco
and your investment decision and Risk Factors
Risks Related to the Offering If NRG is unable to raise
sufficient proceeds through other Financing Transactions
described elsewhere in this prospectus supplement, NRG may draw
down on a bridge loan facility in order to close the Acquisition
which would significantly increase our indebtedness. If NRG
elects not to consummate the financing under the bridge loan
facility, NRG may seek alternative sources of financing for the
Acquisition, the terms of which are unknown to us and could
limit our ability to operate our business elsewhere in
this prospectus supplement. In addition, no assurance can be
given that the Acquisition will be consummated in accordance
with the anticipated or timing or at all. See Risk
Factors Risks Related to the Offering There can be
no assurance that the Acquisition will be consummated in
accordance with the anticipated timing or at all, and the
closing of this offering is not conditioned on the consummation
of the Acquisition. If the Acquisition is not consummated,
NRGs common stock will not reflect any actual or
anticipated interest in Texas Genco, and if the Acquisition is
delayed, this interest will not be reflected during the period
of delay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative | |
|
for Audrain, | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted | |
|
Refinancing and | |
|
As Adjusted | |
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted | |
|
for Audrain | |
|
Texas Genco | |
|
for the | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
for Audrain | |
|
and Refinancing(8) | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Transactions(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
504.3 |
|
|
$ |
519.3 |
|
|
$ |
249.2 |
|
|
$ |
146.4 |
|
|
$ |
163.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including revolving line of credit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Senior Secured Credit Facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Term Loan Facility
|
|
|
796.6 |
|
|
|
796.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Revolving Credit
Facility(2)
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Second Priority
Notes(3)
|
|
|
1,080.4 |
|
|
|
1,080.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xcel Energy
Note(4)
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
New Senior Secured Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446.6 |
|
|
|
3,575.0 |
|
|
|
3,575.0 |
|
S-35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative | |
|
for Audrain, | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted | |
|
Refinancing and | |
|
As Adjusted | |
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted | |
|
for Audrain | |
|
Texas Genco | |
|
for the | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
for Audrain | |
|
and Refinancing(8) | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Transactions(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2016 Fixed Rate Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080.4 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
2014 Fixed Rate Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
Existing non-guarantor
debt(5)
|
|
|
607.2 |
|
|
|
607.2 |
|
|
|
607.2 |
|
|
|
607.2 |
|
|
|
607.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt, before capital leases
|
|
|
2,573.8 |
|
|
|
2,573.8 |
|
|
|
2,143.8 |
|
|
|
7,791.8 |
|
|
|
7,791.8 |
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
470.4 |
|
|
|
230.5 |
|
|
|
230.5 |
|
|
|
234.4 |
|
|
|
234.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and capital leases
|
|
$ |
3,044.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,804.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,374.3 |
|
|
$ |
8,026.2 |
|
|
$ |
8,026.2 |
|
3.625% Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
246.2 |
|
|
|
246.2 |
|
|
|
246.2 |
|
|
|
246.2 |
|
|
|
246.2 |
|
Mandatory Convertible Preferred
Stock(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
484.6 |
|
|
|
484.6 |
|
Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock
|
|
|
406.2 |
|
|
|
406.2 |
|
|
|
406.2 |
|
|
|
406.2 |
|
|
|
406.2 |
|
|
Other stockholders
equity(7)
|
|
|
1,613.0 |
|
|
|
1,628.2 |
|
|
|
1,538.6 |
|
|
|
4,100.8 |
|
|
|
4,075.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
5,309.6 |
|
|
$ |
5,084.9 |
|
|
$ |
4,565.3 |
|
|
$ |
13,264.0 |
|
|
$ |
13,238.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
NRG has entered into the commitment letter with the bridge
lenders pursuant to which the bridge lenders have committed to
fund NRGs new senior secured credit facility and to
provide, subject to certain conditions, the additional financing
required for the Acquisition through a $5.1 billion bridge
loan facility in the event that this offering, the mandatory
convertible preferred stock offering and/or the New Senior Notes
offering are not consummated. In the event that NRG is unable to
raise sufficient proceeds through the consummation of this
offering, the mandatory convertible preferred stock offering
and/or the New Senior Notes offering, NRG may draw down on the
bridge loan facility, in whole or in part, in order to finance
the Acquisition. See Description of Certain
Indebtedness Bridge Loan Facility. In the
event that NRG does not consummate the mandatory convertible
preferred stock offering and the New Senior Notes offering as
currently contemplated and elects not to consummate the
financing under the bridge loan facility, it could seek
alternative sources of financing for the Acquisition, which may
include, among other alternatives, the issuance in part of
senior secured debt securities or borrowing in part on a senior
secured basis. |
|
(2) |
Total borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility
portion of NRGs old senior secured credit facility is
$150.0 million, of which $80.0 million was drawn at
September 30, 2005. |
|
(3) |
The outstanding balance for the Second Priority Notes has been
increased by $14.8 million because the tack-on offering was
sold at a premium. The outstanding note balance excludes a
decrease of $16.7 million as a result of an unfavorable
fair value hedge on an interest rate swap entered into in
March 2004. This interest rate swap will remain after the
Acquisition and Financing Transactions. |
|
(4) |
Xcel Energy Note has been reduced by $0.4 million as a
result of marking the debt to a market rate of 9% in connection
with NRGs Fresh Start reporting on December 5, 2003.
The stated interest rate of the note is 3%. |
|
(5) |
As of September 30, 2005, existing non-guarantor debt has
been reduced by $59.0 million as a result of marking the
debt to a market rate in connection with NRGs Fresh Start
reporting on December 5, 2003. For more information on the
various components of NRGs debt, refer to Note 18 to
NRGs audited consolidated financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2004 as amended on our
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on
December 20, 2005, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(6) |
The Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock will be converted on
March 16, 2009, and is subject to a 5.75% cumulative annual
dividend. The Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock has a total
liquidation preference of $500 million and a conversion
rate ranging from 4.14 to 5.13 shares of common stock per share
of Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, depending on the price
of NRGs common stock at the time of conversion, and is
convertible at the option of the holder at any time. |
|
(7) |
Pro forma adjustments to Stockholders Equity include the
issuance of $1.0 billion of common stock in this offering,
and the issuance of common stock and reissuance of treasury
stock to the Sellers valued at $1,606.4 million. These
amounts are impacted by a $15.3 million gain on the sale of
Audrain, a $25.2 million loss from the sale of Rocky Road
and closing costs net of tax of $118.9 million. |
|
(8) |
Refinancing reflects the changes due to the refinancing of
NRGs old debt structure. |
S-36
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND POLICY
Pursuant to the consummation of the NRG plan of reorganization,
on December 5, 2003, all shares of our old common stock
were canceled and shares of NRGs new common stock were
distributed to the holders of certain classes of claims. From
December 5, 2003 to March 24, 2004, NRGs common
stock was listed on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol
NRGE.OB. Since March 25, 2004, NRGs
common stock has been listed for trading on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol NRG. The following table
sets forth the quarterly high and low share price information
for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter
|
|
$ |
22.50 |
|
|
$ |
18.10 |
|
2nd Quarter
|
|
$ |
24.80 |
|
|
$ |
19.17 |
|
3rd Quarter
|
|
$ |
28.43 |
|
|
$ |
24.10 |
|
4th Quarter
|
|
$ |
36.18 |
|
|
$ |
26.00 |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter
|
|
$ |
39.10 |
|
|
$ |
32.79 |
|
2nd Quarter
|
|
$ |
37.61 |
|
|
$ |
30.30 |
|
3rd Quarter
|
|
$ |
44.45 |
|
|
$ |
36.40 |
|
4th Quarter
|
|
$ |
49.44 |
|
|
$ |
37.60 |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter (through January 25, 2006)
|
|
$ |
49.46 |
|
|
$ |
45.50 |
|
On January 25, 2006, the closing sale price of NRGs
common stock was $49.25. NRG has not declared or paid dividends
on its new common stock, although we may do so in the future.
The terms of our existing senior secured credit facility and the
indenture for the Second Priority Notes restrict, and we expect
the terms of our new senior credit facility and the indenture
governing the New Senior Notes to restrict, our ability to pay
dividends to the holders of our common stock. See
Description of Certain Indebtedness New Senior
Secured Credit Facility and Description of Certain
Indebtedness New Senior Notes. In addition, under
the terms of our outstanding preferred stock, including the
mandatory convertible preferred stock offered as part of the
Financing Transactions, we are restricted from paying any cash
dividend on our common stock if we are not current in our
dividend payments with respect to such preferred stock. If we
issue Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock to the Sellers
pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, we will be prohibited
from paying dividends on our common stock so long as any shares
of Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock are outstanding. See
Description of Capital Stock Preferred Stock.
S-37
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF NRG
The following table presents selected historical consolidated
financial information of (i) Predecessor Company as of and
for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 and
for the period from January 1, 2003 to December 5,
2003 and (ii) Reorganized NRG for the period from
December 6, 2003 to December 31, 2003, as of
December 31, 2003, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004. Predecessor
Company refers to NRGs operations prior to
December 6, 2003, before emergence from bankruptcy and
Reorganized NRG refers to NRGs operations from
December 6, 2003 onwards, after emergence from bankruptcy.
The selected historical consolidated financial information of
Predecessor Company as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 and for the period from
January 1, 2003 to December 5, 2003 is derived from
the historical financial information contained in the audited
consolidated financial statements of Predecessor Company
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement.
The selected historical consolidated financial information of
Reorganized NRG for the period December 6, 2003 to
December 31, 2003 and as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 is derived from the historical financial
information contained in the audited consolidated financial
statements of Reorganized NRG incorporated by reference in this
prospectus supplement. The summary unaudited historical
consolidated financial information as of and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 (i) have been
derived from Reorganized NRGs unaudited consolidated
financial statements which are incorporated by reference in this
prospectus supplement, (ii) have been prepared on a similar
basis to that used in the preparation of the audited financial
statements of Reorganized NRG and (iii) in the opinion of
NRGs management, include all adjustments necessary for a
fair statement of the results for the unaudited interim period.
The selected historical consolidated financial information set
forth below should be read in conjunction with managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations and the consolidated financial statements of
Predecessor Company and Reorganized NRG and the related notes
thereto incorporated by reference into this prospectus
supplement. The results for period of less than a full year are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any
interim period.
S-38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company | |
|
Reorganized NRG | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
For the Year | |
|
For the Year | |
|
For the Year | |
|
Period from | |
|
Period from | |
|
For the Year | |
|
For the Nine | |
|
For the Nine | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
January 1- | |
|
December 6- | |
|
Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 5, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
31, 2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share data) | |
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$ |
1,664,980 |
|
|
$ |
2,085,350 |
|
|
$ |
1,938,293 |
|
|
$ |
1,798,387 |
|
|
$ |
138,490 |
|
|
$ |
2,347,882 |
|
|
$ |
1,770,669 |
|
|
$ |
1,942,828 |
|
Legal settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh start reporting adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,118,636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,825 |
|
|
|
2,461 |
|
|
|
(13,390 |
) |
|
|
(1,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,563,060 |
|
|
|
237,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,661 |
|
|
|
42,183 |
|
|
|
6,223 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,308,589 |
|
|
|
1,703,531 |
|
|
|
4,321,385 |
|
|
|
(1,475,523 |
) |
|
|
122,328 |
|
|
|
1,955,887 |
|
|
|
1,459,756 |
|
|
|
1,861,569 |
|
Minority interest in (earnings)/losses of consolidated
subsidiaries
|
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
139,364 |
|
|
|
210,032 |
|
|
|
68,996 |
|
|
|
170,901 |
|
|
|
13,521 |
|
|
|
159,825 |
|
|
|
117,187 |
|
|
|
82,501 |
|
Write downs and losses on sales of equity method investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200,472 |
) |
|
|
(147,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,270 |
) |
|
|
(14,057 |
) |
|
|
15,894 |
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
149,729 |
|
|
|
210,502 |
|
|
|
(2,788,452 |
) |
|
|
2,949,078 |
|
|
|
11,405 |
|
|
|
159,144 |
|
|
|
142,154 |
|
|
|
6,991 |
|
Income/(loss) on discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
33,206 |
|
|
|
54,702 |
|
|
|
(675,830 |
) |
|
|
(182,633 |
) |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
26,473 |
|
|
|
25,326 |
|
|
|
12,612 |
|
Net
income/(loss)(1)
|
|
|
182,935 |
|
|
|
265,204 |
|
|
|
(3,464,282 |
) |
|
|
2,766,445 |
|
|
|
11,025 |
|
|
|
185,617 |
|
|
|
167,480 |
|
|
|
19,603 |
|
Net income per sharebasic
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.86 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Net income per sharediluted
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic (in millions)
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted (in millions)
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company | |
|
Reorganized NRG | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
For the Year | |
|
For the Year | |
|
For the Year | |
|
Period from | |
|
Period from | |
|
For the Year | |
|
For the Nine | |
|
For the Nine | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
January 1- | |
|
December 6- | |
|
Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 5, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share data) | |
|
|
|
|
Other Financial and Operating Data and Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
(223,560 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,322,130 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,439,733 |
) |
|
$ |
(113,502 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,560 |
) |
|
$ |
(114,360 |
) |
|
$ |
(78,293 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,518 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
92,673 |
|
|
|
140,975 |
|
|
|
207,027 |
|
|
|
218,843 |
|
|
|
11,808 |
|
|
|
208,036 |
|
|
|
158,603 |
|
|
|
144,317 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
361,678 |
|
|
|
276,014 |
|
|
|
430,042 |
|
|
|
238,509 |
|
|
|
(588,875 |
) |
|
|
643,993 |
|
|
|
595,421 |
|
|
|
(113,802 |
) |
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges(2)
|
|
|
1.81x |
|
|
|
1.26x |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
9.82x(4 |
) |
|
|
1.68x |
|
|
|
1.83x |
|
|
|
1.80x |
|
|
|
1.19x |
|
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preference
dividends(2)
|
|
|
1.81x |
|
|
|
1.26x |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
9.82x |
(4) |
|
|
1.68x |
|
|
|
1.82x |
|
|
|
1.80x |
|
|
|
1.04x |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
36,746 |
|
|
$ |
86,738 |
|
|
$ |
360,860 |
|
|
|
395,982 |
|
|
$ |
551,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,103,678 |
|
|
$ |
1,098,782 |
|
|
$ |
504,336 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
7,236 |
|
|
|
68,320 |
|
|
|
211,966 |
|
|
|
493,047 |
|
|
|
116,067 |
|
|
|
109,633 |
|
|
|
145,571 |
|
|
|
91,508 |
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
5,986,289 |
|
|
|
12,915,222 |
|
|
|
10,896,851 |
|
|
|
9,167,329 |
|
|
|
9,244,987 |
|
|
|
7,830,283 |
|
|
|
8,185,858 |
|
|
|
7,795,367 |
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recourse corporate level debt
|
|
|
1,512,386 |
|
|
|
3,742,400 |
|
|
|
3,998,280 |
|
|
|
8,651 |
|
|
|
2,458,690 |
|
|
|
2,544,048 |
|
|
|
2,437,088 |
|
|
|
1,964,865 |
|
|
Non-recourse project level debt
|
|
|
1,689,954 |
|
|
|
3,946,811 |
|
|
|
4,814,432 |
|
|
|
3,386,434 |
|
|
|
1,689,340 |
|
|
|
1,179,806 |
|
|
|
1,131,764 |
|
|
|
1,077,533 |
|
|
Total long-term debt including current maturities
|
|
|
3,202,340 |
|
|
|
7,689,211 |
|
|
|
8,812,712 |
|
|
|
3,395,085 |
|
|
|
4,148,030 |
|
|
|
3,723,854 |
|
|
|
3,568,852 |
|
|
|
3,042,398 |
|
Stockholders equity/(deficit)
|
|
|
1,462,088 |
|
|
|
2,237,129 |
|
|
|
(696,199 |
) |
|
|
2,404,000 |
|
|
|
2,437,256 |
|
|
|
2,692,164 |
|
|
|
2,597,151 |
|
|
|
2,019,168 |
|
S-39
|
|
(1) |
Our results include the following items that have had a
significant impact on our operations during the periods
indicated below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor Company | |
|
Reorganized NRG | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
For the Year | |
|
For the Year | |
|
For the Year | |
|
Period from | |
|
Period from | |
|
For the Nine | |
|
For the Nine | |
|
For the Year | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
January 1- | |
|
December 6- | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 5, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share data) | |
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) on discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
$ |
33,206 |
|
|
$ |
54,702 |
|
|
$ |
(675,830 |
) |
|
$ |
(182,633 |
) |
|
$ |
(380 |
) |
|
$ |
26,473 |
|
|
$ |
25,326 |
|
|
$ |
12,612 |
|
Legal settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh start reporting adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,118,636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate relocation charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
|
12,474 |
|
|
|
5,651 |
|
Reorganization items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,825 |
|
|
|
2,461 |
|
|
|
(13,390 |
) |
|
|
(1,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,563,060 |
|
|
|
237,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,661 |
|
|
|
42,183 |
|
|
|
6,223 |
|
Write downs and gains/(losses) on sales of equity method
investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200,472 |
) |
|
|
(147,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,270 |
) |
|
|
(14,057 |
) |
|
|
15,894 |
|
FERC authorized settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,357 |
) |
|
|
(38,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Write down of Note Receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,572 |
|
|
|
4,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing
earnings by fixed charges. The ratio of earnings to fixed
charges and preference dividends is computed by dividing
earnings by fixed charges and preference dividends. For this
purpose, earnings includes pre-tax income
(loss) before adjustments for minority interest in our
consolidated subsidiaries and income or loss from equity
investees, plus fixed charges and distributed income of equity
investees, and amortization of capitalized interest reduced by
interest capitalized. Fixed charges include
interest, whether expensed or capitalized for both continuing
and discontinued operations, amortization of debt expense and
the portion of rental expense that is representative of the
interest factor in these rentals. Preference
dividends equals the amount of pre-tax earnings that is
required to pay the dividends on outstanding preference
securities. |
|
(3) |
For the year ended December 31, 2002, the deficiency of
earnings to fixed charges was $3,023 million. |
|
(4) |
For the period January 1, 2003 through December 5,
2003, the earnings include a one time earning of $4,119 million
due to Fresh Start adjustments. |
S-40
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF TEXAS GENCO
The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated
financial information for Texas Genco LLC and its subsidiaries
and for Texas Genco Holdings, Inc., Texas Genco LLCs
predecessor for financial reporting purposes, and its
subsidiaries. Because Texas Genco LLC acquired Texas Genco
Holdings, Inc. as part of a multi-step transaction in which the
Initial Acquisition (as described below) was consummated on
December 15, 2004 and the Nuclear Acquisition (as described
below) was consummated on April 13, 2005, information is
presented for (i) Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, and as of
and for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and for
the period from January 1, 2005 through April 13, 2005
and (ii) Texas Genco LLC as of December 31, 2004, the
period from July 19, 2004, or Inception, through
December 31, 2004 and as of and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005.
The selected historical consolidated financial information for
Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were derived
from Texas Genco Holdings, Inc.s audited financial
statements incorporated by reference into this prospectus
supplement. The selected historical consolidated financial
information for Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. as of and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2004 and for the period
from January 1, 2005 through April 13, 2005
(i) were derived from Texas Genco Holdings, Inc.s
unaudited financial statements, (ii) have been prepared on
a similar basis to that used in the preparation of Texas Genco
Holdings, Inc.s audited financial statements, and
(iii) in the opinion of Texas Gencos management,
include all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the
results for the unaudited interim period. The financial
information for Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. reflects ownership of
the Non-Nuclear Assets for periods prior to December 15,
2004 and of an undivided 44.0% interest in STP for all periods
presented, and is therefore not comparable to the historical
financial information for Texas Genco LLC, which reflects
ownership of the Non-Nuclear Assets only for periods subsequent
to December 15, 2004, the Nuclear Acquisition only for
periods subsequent to April 13, 2005 and the ROFR (as
described below) only for periods subsequent to May 19,
2005.
The selected historical consolidated financial information for
Texas Genco LLC as of December 31, 2004 and for the period
from July 19, 2004 (Inception) through December 31,
2004 were derived from the audited consolidated financial
statements of Texas Genco LLC incorporated by reference into
this prospectus supplement. The selected historical consolidated
financial information for Texas Genco LLC as of and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 (i) were derived from
unaudited financial statements of Texas Genco LLC incorporated
by reference into this prospectus supplement, (ii) have
been prepared on a similar basis to that used in the preparation
of the audited financial statements of Texas Genco LLC, and
(iii) in the opinion of Texas Gencos management,
include all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the
results for the unaudited interim period. The results for a
periods for less than a full year are not necessarily indicative
of the results to be expected for any interim period. Texas
Genco LLC did not exist prior to Inception; therefore, no
consolidated financial and other information has been presented
in the following table for Texas Genco LLC for any other period.
The selected consolidated historical financial information of
Texas Genco LLC and Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. set forth below
should be read in conjunction with managements discussion
and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
and the consolidated financial statements of Texas Genco LLC and
Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. and the related notes thereto
incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement.
S-41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. Predecessor | |
|
Texas Genco LLC(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
July 19, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
For the Nine | |
|
|
|
|
Months Ended | |
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
For the Years Ended December | |
|
September 30, | |
|
April 13, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000(2) | |
|
2001(2) | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
($ in millions, except per unit data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(3)
|
|
$ |
3,334 |
|
|
$ |
3,411 |
|
|
$ |
1,541 |
|
|
$ |
2,002 |
|
|
$ |
2,054 |
|
|
$ |
1,630 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel and purchased power
expense(4)
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
Operation and
maintenance(5)
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
Write-down of
assets(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
Taxes other than income taxes
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
1,896 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Interest income (expense),
net(7)
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
367 |
|
Income tax expense
(benefit)(8)
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effective of accounting
change
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
346 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of
tax(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (loss)
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
(93 |
) |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
(99 |
) |
|
$ |
(170 |
) |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic
|
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
(1.16 |
) |
|
$ |
3.13 |
|
|
$ |
(1.25 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.13 |
) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted
|
|
|
2.15 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
(1.16 |
) |
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
(1.25 |
) |
|
|
(2.13 |
) |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
1.98 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic (in
millions)(10)
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
79.4 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
64.8 |
|
|
|
156.5 |
|
|
|
168.6 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted (in
millions)(10)
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
79.4 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
64.8 |
|
|
|
156.5 |
|
|
|
175.1 |
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
46.0 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment,
net(11)
|
|
$ |
3,667 |
|
|
$ |
3,905 |
|
|
$ |
4,096 |
|
|
$ |
4,126 |
|
|
$ |
474 |
|
|
$ |
478 |
|
|
$ |
474 |
|
|
$ |
2,446 |
|
|
$ |
3,542 |
|
Total
assets(12)
|
|
|
4,032 |
|
|
|
4,323 |
|
|
|
4,508 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
4,272 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
4,588 |
|
|
|
6,099 |
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
2,743 |
|
Net capitalization
|
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,824 |
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
equity(12)(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Texas Genco LLC was formed on July 19, 2004 to facilitate
the acquisition of Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. in a multi-step
transaction from CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and other minority
public stockholders. On December 13, 2004, Texas Genco
Holdings, Inc. divided its nuclear and non-nuclear generating
assets and liabilities between two of its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. Its non-nuclear generating assets and liabilities
were allocated to Texas Genco II, LP and its nuclear assets and
liabilities and its cash were allocated to Texas Genco, LP. The
non-nuclear generating assets and liabilities, together with
assets and liabilities unrelated to the wholesale generation
business held by Texas Genco Services, LP, another wholly-owned
subsidiary of Texas Genco Holdings, Inc., are referred to as the
Non-Nuclear Assets. On December 14, 2004, Texas
Genco Holdings, Inc. merged with a wholly-owned subsidiary of
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. As a result of this merger, CenterPoint
Energy, Inc. acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common
stock of Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. On December 15, 2004,
two wholly-owned subsidiaries of Texas Genco LLC merged with and
into Texas Genco II, LP and Texas Genco Services, LP,
respectively. As a result of these mergers, referred to as the
Initial Acquisition, Texas Genco II, LP and Texas
Genco Services, LP became wholly-owned subsidiaries of Texas
Genco LLC and Texas Genco LLC thereby acquired the Non-Nuclear
Assets. On April 13, 2005, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Texas Genco LLC merged with and into Texas Genco Holdings, Inc.
As a result of this merger, which is referred to as the
Nuclear Acquisition, Texas Genco Holdings, Inc.
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Texas Genco LLC and Texas
Genco LLC thereby indirectly acquired Texas Genco Holdings,
Inc.s assets and liabilities, including its indirect 30.8%
undivided interest in STP. On May 19, 2005, pursuant to the
exercise of a right of first refusal by Texas Genco, LP
subsequent to a third party offer to American Electric Power, or
AEP, in early 2004, Texas Genco LLC acquired from AEP an
additional indirect 13.2% undivided interest, equivalent to 330
MW, in STP for approximately $174.2 million, less
adjustments for working capital and other purchase price
adjustments. This acquisition is referred to as the
ROFR. As a result, Texas Genco LLC, through Texas
Genco, LP, owns a 44.0% undivided interest, equivalent to 1,101
MW, in STP. The transactions described above are referred to,
collectively, as the The Texas Genco Formation
Transactions. |
S-42
|
|
(2) |
Prior to January 1, 2002, Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. sold
power as part of an integrated utility at regulated rates;
thereafter, power was sold at market-based rates. Therefore, the
historical information included in the Texas Genco Holdings,
Inc. financial statements for periods prior to January 1,
2002 does not reflect what the financial position and results of
operations of Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. would have been had
Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. been operated as a separate,
stand-alone wholesale electric power generation company in a
deregulated market during the periods presented. |
|
(3) |
Revenues for Texas Genco LLC include amortization of the
liability related to below-market power sales contracts recorded
in connection with the Initial Acquisition and the effect of
other non-trading derivatives, which increased revenues by
$12.3 million and decreased revenues by $3.6 million,
respectively, for the period from Inception through
December 31, 2004. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, amortization of the liability related
to below-market power sales contracts increased revenues for
Texas Genco LLC by $186.3 million and the effect of other
non-trading derivatives decreased revenues for Texas Genco LLC
by $28.9 million. |
|
(4) |
Fuel and purchased power expense for Texas Genco LLC includes
fuel-related depreciation and amortization amortization of
nuclear fuel and the amortization of the liability related
to above-market coal purchase contracts (which contracts expire
in 2010) recorded in connection with the Initial Acquisition.
Fuel-related depreciation and amortization had no effect on fuel
expense for the period of Inception through December 31, 2004
and increased fuel expense by $10.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005. The amortization of the
liability related to above-market coal purchase contracts
decreased fuel and purchased power expense for Texas Genco LLC
by $1.5 million for the period from Inception through
December 31, 2004 and $37.0 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005. |
|
(5) |
Operation and maintenance for Texas Genco Holdings, Inc.
includes allocations of overhead costs from CenterPoint Energy,
Inc. Operations and maintenance for Texas Genco LLC includes
payments to CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and Reliant Energy, Inc.
for transition services. Operations and maintenance for Texas
Genco LLC for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
includes a charge of $35.3 million related to our workforce
optimization plan and a payment of $7.5 million of
monitoring fees paid to affiliates of The Blackstone Group,
Hellman & Friedman LLC, Kohlberg Kravis
Roberts & Co. L.P. and Texas Pacific Group. |
|
(6) |
For the year ended December 31, 2004, Texas Genco Holdings,
Inc. recorded an asset impairment of $763.0 million
($426.0 million net of tax) to reflect the net realizable
value for the assets to be sold in the Initial Acquisition.
Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. ceased depreciation on its coal,
lignite and natural gas-fired generation plants at the time
these assets were considered held for sale. This
resulted in a decrease in depreciation expense of
$69.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
compared to the same period in 2003. |
|
(7) |
Interest income (expense), net for Texas Genco LLC includes
amortization of deferred financing fees of $(1.0) million for
the period from Inception through December 31, 2004 and
$10.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005. |
|
(8) |
Texas Genco LLC is a limited liability company that is treated
as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and is,
therefore, not itself subject to federal income taxation.
Profits or losses are subject to taxation at the member interest
level. Texas Genco Holdings, Inc., holds an indirect 44.0%
undivided interest in STP and is a corporation that is subject
to U.S. federal income taxation on its income. |
|
(9) |
Cumulative effect of an accounting change resulting from the
allocation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations. |
|
|
(10) |
Texas Genco Holdings, Inc.s Board of Directors declared an
80,000,000-for-one stock split that was effected on
December 18, 2002. On January 6, 2003, CenterPoint
Energy distributed approximately 19% of the 80,000,000
outstanding shares of Texas Gencos common stock to
CenterPoint Energys shareholders. Earnings per share has
been presented as if the 80,000,000 shares were outstanding for
all historical periods in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings Per
Share. |
|
(11) |
In accordance with ERCOT rules, Texas Genco has placed four
units into mothball status for more than 180 days, retired
one unit, sold one unit and intends to sell eight units,
together representing approximately 3,378 MW of available
capacity. Texas Genco placed one additional unit representing
approximately 461 MW of net capacity, which was operated
pursuant to a reliability must run contract with the
ERCOT, into mothball status for more than 180 days when the
contract terminated on October 29, 2005. On
November 14, 2005, Texas Genco completed the sale of its
natural gas-fired generation plant at Deepwater, representing
174 MW of available capacity. |
|
(12) |
Total assets and members equity as of September 30,
2005 reflects distributions to members of an aggregate of
$85.8 million from July 1, 2005 through
September 30, 2005, representing preliminary distributions
of net proceeds relating to certain asset sales. |
|
(13) |
Members equity includes capital contributions from Texas
Gencos existing equityholders of $899.5 million, of
which $892.2 million was contributed by the investment
funds affiliated with The Blackstone Group, Hellman &
Friedman LLC, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. and
Texas Pacific Group and $7.3 million was contributed by
certain members of Texas Gencos management team. |
S-43
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES DISCUSSION
Our unaudited pro forma combined financial information
incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement does
not purport to represent what our financial condition would
actually have been had the Acquisition and the Financing
Transactions in fact occurred on the dates specified below or to
project our results of operations for any future period. See
Risk FactorsRisks Related to the
AcquisitionBecause the historical and pro forma financial
information incorporated by reference or included elsewhere in
this prospectus supplement may not be representative of our
capital structure after the Acquisition, and NRGs and
Texas Gencos historical financial information are not
comparable to their current financial information, you have
limited financial information on which to evaluate us, NRG,
Texas Genco and your investment decision. In addition, the
closing of this offering is not conditioned on the consummation
of the Acquisition. While we expect that the Acquisition will be
consummated in or about the first week of February 2006, no
assurance can be given that the Acquisition will be completed in
accordance with the anticipated timing or at all. See Risk
FactorsRisks Related to the OfferingThere can be no
assurance that the Acquisition will be consummated in accordance
with the anticipated timing or at all, and the closing of this
offering is not conditioned on the consummation of the
Acquisition. If the Acquisition is not consummated, NRGs
common stock will not reflect any actual or anticipated interest
in Texas Genco, and if the Acquisition is delayed, this interest
will not be reflected during the period of delay. For
information regarding NRGs managements discussion
and analysis of financial condition and results of operations,
see Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference
and Where You Can Find More Information.
The adjustments reflected in our unaudited pro forma
financial information are based on available information and
assumptions we believe are reasonable, including our assumptions
regarding the financing for the Acquisition that may prove to be
inaccurate. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to the
OfferingIf NRG is unable to raise sufficient proceeds
through other Financing Transactions described elsewhere in this
prospectus supplement, NRG may draw down on a bridge loan
facility in order to close the Acquisition which would
significantly increase our indebtedness. If NRG elects not to
consummate the financing under the bridge loan facility, NRG may
seek alternative sources of financing for the Acquisition, the
terms of which are unknown to us and could limit our ability to
operate our business elsewhere in this prospectus
supplement.
Basis of Presentation
On September 30, 2005, NRG entered into the Acquisition
Agreement with Texas Genco and the Sellers. Under the
Acquisition Agreement, NRG agreed to purchase from the Sellers
100% of the outstanding equity interests of Texas Genco. After
the completion of the Acquisition, Texas Genco will become a
100% wholly-owned subsidiary of NRG. The Acquisition is
currently expected to close in the first quarter of 2006. For a
discussion of the Acquisition, see The Acquisition.
The Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, or MD&A, for each of
NRG and Texas Genco incorporated by reference into this
prospectus supplement were based upon each of their respective
historical financial statements, and should each be read
together with their respective historical consolidated financial
statements, the notes to those financial statements and the
other financial information incorporated by reference or
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus supplement. Because
neither NRGs nor Texas Gencos historical financial
statements reflect the Acquisition and the Financing
Transactions, a discussion of NRGs and Texas Gencos
historical results of operations do not provide a sufficient
understanding of the financial condition and results of
operations of our business after giving effect to the
consummation of the Acquisition and the Financing Transactions.
NRGs historical financial statements for the 2003 fiscal
year are not comparable to its current financial statements. As
a result of NRGs emergence from bankruptcy, it is
operating its business with a new capital structure, and is
subject to Fresh Start reporting requirements prescribed by
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
As required by Fresh Start reporting, assets and liabilities as
of December 6, 2003 were recorded at fair value, with the
enterprise value being determined in connection with the
reorganization. Texas Gencos historical financial
statements are not comparable to its current financial
S-44
statements. Texas Genco did not exist prior to July 19,
2004 and, accordingly no comparative financial information for
prior periods is available.
The pro forma results also include adjustments for the following
transactions that either occurred after the announcement of the
Acquisition or pursuant to applicable rules are reflected in our
pro forma results:
|
|
|
(i) On December 8, 2005 NRG entered into an Asset
Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell all the assets of NRG
Audrain Generating LLC, or Audrain, to AmerenUE, a subsidiary of
Ameren Corporation. For purposes of these pro forma statements
we have reflected the sale of assets of Audrain as a
discontinued operation. The purchase price is $115 million,
subject to customary purchase price adjustments. The transaction
is expected to close during the first half of 2006. The sale is
subject to customary approvals, including FERC, Missouri Public
Utilities Commission, Illinois Commerce Commission, and
Hart-Scott-Rodino review. We expect to record a gain of
approximately $15 million at closing. |
|
|
(ii) On May 19, 2005, pursuant to the exercise of a
right of first refusal, or the RFOR, by Texas Genco, subsequent
to a third party offer to American Electric Power, or AEP, in
early 2004, Texas Genco acquired from AEP an additional 13.2%
undivided interest in South Texas Project, or STP. As a result,
Texas Genco now owns a 44.0% undivided interest in STP. For pro
forma purposes, NRG has accounted for the ROFR as a business
acquisition and included the ROFR in our pro forma adjustments
to the statements of operation. |
|
|
(iii) On December 27, 2005, NRG entered into two
purchase and sale agreements for projects
co-owned with Dynegy,
Inc. Under the agreements, NRG will acquire Dynegys
50 percent ownership interest in WCP Holdings, and become
the sole owner of WCPs 1,808 MW of generation in
Southern California. In addition, NRG is selling to Dynegy its
50 percent ownership interest in Rocky Road Power LLC, or
Rocky Road, a 330 MW gas-fueled, simple cycle peaking plant
located in Dundee, Illinois. These transactions are conditioned
upon each other and NRG will pay Dynegy a net purchase price of
$160 million at closing. NRG will effectively fund the net
purchase price with cash held by WCP. NRG anticipates closing
both transactions during the first quarter 2006. For purposes of
these pro forma financial statements, we have assumed that the
fair value of our equity investment in Rocky Road is equal to
the negotiated price of $45 million. The current cost of
our investment in Rocky Road is $70.2 million as of
September 30, 2005 and we will record an impairment in our
investment due to an other-than-temporary loss in our Rocky Road
investment in the amount of $25.2 million. |
For these reasons, our discussion below focuses on a discussion
of our pro forma combined financial position as of
September 30, 2005, which is included in a Current Report
on a Form 8-K
filed on December 21, 2005 as amended by our current report
on From 8-K/ A as
filed on January 5, 2006, our current report on
Form 8-K/A as
filed on January 23, 2006 and our current report on
Form 8-K/ A as
filed on January 26, 2006, and incorporated by reference
into this prospectus supplement.
This pro forma financial information may not reflect what our
financial position would have been had we operated on a combined
basis and may not be indicative of what our financial position
will be in the future.
The discussion below contains certain statements of a
forward-looking nature that involve risks and uncertainties. As
a result of many factors, including those set forth under the
sections entitled Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and Risk Factors and those
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus supplement, actual
results may differ materially from those anticipated by such
forward-looking statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We plan to enter into a new senior secured credit facility for
up to an aggregate amount of $5.575 billion to replace our
existing senior credit facility. The senior secured credit
facility is expected to consist of a $3.575 billion senior
first priority secured term loan facility, a $1.0 billion
senior first priority secured revolving credit facility and a
$1.0 billion senior first priority secured synthetic letter
of credit facility. Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., an
affiliate of one of the underwriters for this offering, will be
the administrative agent
S-45
and one of its affiliates will be the collateral agent pursuant
to the new senior secured credit facility. Citigroup Global
Markets Inc., one of the underwriters for this offering, will be
the syndication agent. Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. will be the joint lead book
runners, joint lead arrangers and co-documentation agents
thereunder. Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., Citigroup
Global Markets Inc., Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., Bank of
America, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG Cayman Islands Branch, Merrill
Lynch Capital Corporation and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners
L.P., each an underwriter or an affiliate of one of the
underwriters for this offering, will be lenders under the new
senior secured credit facility.
We expect to draw down approximately $3.575 billion from
the term loan facility to be used together with the net proceeds
(after giving effect to underwriting discounts and commissions)
of approximately $3.53 billion from the notes offering, the
offerings of common stock of $1.0 billion,
$0.5 billion in mandatory convertible preferred stock and
additional cash on hand, to finance the Acquisition, to repay
$2 billion of our indebtedness and $2.7 billion of
Texas Gencos outstanding indebtedness and to pay related
fees and expenses. Also see Use of Proceeds Sources
and Uses of Funds.
The new senior secured credit facility will be guaranteed by
substantially all of our subsidiaries, with certain customary or
agreed-upon exceptions for immaterial subsidiaries and
subsidiaries defined as unrestricted, foreign
subsidiaries and certain project subsidiaries. In addition, it
will be secured by liens on substantially all of our assets and
the assets of our subsidiaries, with certain customary or
agreed-upon exceptions for foreign subsidiaries, certain project
subsidiaries and other subsidiaries or assets, and by a pledge
of certain of our subsidiaries capital stock.
The term loan, the revolving credit and the synthetic letter of
credit facilities will mature in seven, five and
seven years, respectively, from the closing date of the new
senior secured credit facility. The term loan facility amortizes
on a quarterly basis as described in Description of
Certain Indebtedness New Senior Secured Credit
Facility. Borrowings under the new senior secured credit
facility bear interest at an alternate base rate (calculated on
the basis of prime rate) plus an applicable margin, or at an
adjusted Eurodollar rate (calculated on the basis of the LIBO
rate) plus an applicable margin, in each case as described in
Description of Certain IndebtednessNew Senior
Secured Credit Facility.
There are certain affirmative and negative covenants (including
financial covenants) placed on us under the new senior secured
credit facility, including, but not limited to, restrictions on
equity issuances, payment of dividends on or capital stock, the
issuance of additional debt, incurrence of liens and capital
expenditures, as further described in Description of
Certain IndebtednessNew Senior Secured Credit
Facility.
As of September 30, 2005, on a pro forma basis after giving
effect to the Acquisition and the Financing Transactions, our
new senior first priority secured term loan facility would be
drawn in its entirety, $1 billion of borrowings would be
available under our new senior first priority secured revolving
credit facility and $1 billion of undrawn letters of credit
capacity would have been available under our new senior first
priority secured synthetic letter of credit facility. As of
September 30, 2005, on a pro forma basis after giving
effect to (i) the sale of Audrain; (ii) the inclusion
of the results pursuant to the ROFR; (iii) the refinancing
of NRGs old debt structure; (iv) the remaining
Financing Transactions and subsequent Acquisition; and
(v) the acquisition of the remaining 50% ownership interest
in WCP Holdings and the sale of our 50% ownership interest in
Rocky Road, we would have had approximately $8.0 billion of
indebtedness, which includes the notes and amounts outstanding
under our new senior secured credit facility. Of this total,
approximately $3.575 billion would have been our secured
indebtedness and the secured indebtedness of our subsidiaries.
Interest payments on the notes and on borrowings under the new
senior secured credit facility will significantly increase our
liquidity requirements. See Capitalization.
Certain of our subsidiaries and affiliates are subject to
project financing. Such entities will not guarantee our
obligations on the notes. The debt agreements of these
subsidiaries and project affiliates generally restrict their
ability to pay dividends, make distributions or otherwise
transfer funds to us. On a pro forma basis, giving effect to
(i) the sale of Audrain; (ii) the inclusion of the
results pursuant to the ROFR; (iii) the refinancing of
NRGs old debt structure; (iv) the remaining Financing
Transactions and subsequent Acquisition; and (v) the
acquisition of the remaining 50% ownership interest in
WCP Holdings and the sale of our 50%
S-46
ownership interest in Rocky Road, our guarantor subsidiaries
would have represented approximately 90% of our revenues from
wholly owned subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, and the nine months ended
September 30, 2005. On a pro forma basis, our guarantor
subsidiaries would have held approximately 90% of our
consolidated assets as of September 30, 2005, and our
non-guarantor subsidiaries would have had approximately
$781 million in aggregate principal amount of funded
indebtedness as of September 30, 2005. Our outstanding
consolidated trade payables would have been $339 million as
of September 30, 2005, on a pro forma basis. On a pro forma
basis, approximately 77% of these trade payables would have
constituted obligations of NRG Energy, Inc. and our guarantor
subsidiaries.
We expect that our 2006 total capital expenditures will be
approximately $295.5 million and will relate to the
operation and maintenance of our existing generating facilities.
Also, see further discussions in the respective
managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations of NRG Energy Inc. and Texas Genco
incorporated herein by reference.
Texas Genco entered into a power purchase agreement with
J. Aron & Company, the commodities trading
subsidiary of Goldman Sachs & Co, which we refer to as
J. Aron and the related agreement as the J. Aron PPA.
Under the J. Aron PPA, Texas Genco sold forward, on a fixed
price basis, a substantial portion of its expected ERCOT
generation capacity beginning January 1, 2005 through
December 31, 2010. As a result of the J. Aron PPA and
certain power sales and gas swap transactions, approximately 26%
of Texas Gencos net baseload generation capacity in Texas,
and approximately 16% of the combined companys total net
baseload capacity, as measured in MWh through 2010 has been sold
on a fixed price basis to J. Aron, making J. Aron one
of the combined companys largest customers on a going
forward basis.
As collateral for Texas Gencos obligations under the
J. Aron PPA and certain power sales and gas swap
transactions, Texas Genco agreed to post letters of credit and
grant a second lien on Texas Gencos assets in favor of
J. Aron. For a detailed description of these credit support
arrangements, see Description of Certain
Indebtedness. The obligations of J. Aron under the
J. Aron PPA and a subsequent natural gas swap are supported
by an unlimited guarantee from J. Arons parent, The
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Six other trading counterparties have similar arrangements with
Texas Genco related to hedging agreements through
December 31, 2010 collateralized by letters of credit and a
retained second lien on the Texas Gencos assets. These
additional six counterparties comprise approximately 22% of
Texas Gencos net baseload capacity in Texas, and
approximately 13% of the combined companys total net
baseload capacity, as measured in MWh through December 31,
2010. NRG expects that, at the closing of the Acquisition and
the Financing Transactions, the collateral arrangements
described above, including with respect to certain
counterparties holding second liens on the ERCOT assets, will
remain in place or will be replaced with substitute collateral
arrangements comprising an interest in a second lien position on
substantially all of NRGs assets. On a going forward
basis, NRG intends to secure some or all of its commodity
hedging activities with interests in a second lien position on
substantially all of NRGs assets. There can be no
assurance that this second lien position will provide enough
capacity to cover all commodity hedges that are necessary or
desirable for adequately hedging NRGs commodity risk. See
Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Operation of our
BusinessWe may not have sufficient liquidity to hedge
market risks effectively.
As discussed in the Business section in respect to
Texas Gencos forward power sales, our revenues and cash
flows from operations from forward power sales will decrease
from $1.6 billion to $1.4 billion due to a reduction
in the average contracted rates, from $44 per MWh to $39 per
MWh. Total MWhs sold remains substantially the same. This
reduction in the contracted price will reduce the revenues and
cash flows from operations of the combined company by
approximately $209 million during 2007 in comparison to
2006. However, based upon our current level of operations, we
believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents balances and
our cash from operating activities, together with available
borrowings under our new senior secured credit facility will be
adequate to meet our anticipated requirements for working
capital, capital expenditures, commitments, contingent purchase
prices, program and other discretionary investments, and
interest and principal payments for at least the next
twenty-four months.
In the event that NRG is unable to raise sufficient proceeds
through the consummation of the New Senior Notes offering and/or
the mandatory convertible preferred stock offering described
elsewhere in this
S-47
prospectus supplement, NRG may draw down, in whole or in part,
on a $5.1 billion bridge loan facility made available to it
by the bridge lenders in order to finance the Acquisition. See
Description of Certain IndebtednessBridge
Loan Facility. In the event of such draw down, we
would be significantly more highly leveraged, which means we
will have a larger amount of indebtedness in relation to our
stockholders equity. Our interest expense would
significantly increase and require us to dedicate a substantial
portion of our cash flow from operations to payments in respect
of our outstanding indebtedness. Our substantial indebtedness
could adversely affect our financial condition and prevent us
from fulfilling our obligations under our debt instruments. In
the event that NRG does not consummate the New Senior Notes and
mandatory convertible stock offerings as currently contemplated
and elects not to consummate the financing under the bridge loan
facility, it could seek alternative sources of financing for the
Acquisition, which may include, among other alternatives, the
issuance in part of senior secured debt securities or borrowing
in part on a senior secured basis. There can be no assurance as
to the terms on which NRG would issue these senior secured debt
securities or borrow funds. We are unable to predict the
interest rate payable on any such debt or give any assurance
that the terms would not restrict our financial flexibility or
limit our ability to operate our business. See Risk
FactorsRisks Related to the OfferingIf NRG is unable
to raise sufficient proceeds through other Financing
Transactions described elsewhere in this prospectus supplement,
NRG may draw down on a bridge loan facility in order to close
the Acquisition which would significantly increase our
indebtedness. If NRG elects not to consummate the financing
under the bridge loan facility, NRG may seek alternative sources
of financing for the Acquisition, the terms of which are unknown
to us and could limit our ability to operate our business.
S-48
BUSINESS
Business
In this section, NRG refers to NRG Energy, Inc.
together with its consolidated subsidiaries, and Texas
Genco refers to Texas Genco LLC, together with its
consolidated subsidiaries. On September 30, 2005, NRG
entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Texas Genco.
We, our, us, the
combined company and the Company refer
to NRG and Texas Genco on a combined basis, together with their
consolidated subsidiaries, after giving pro forma effect to the
completion of the Acquisition and the Financing Transactions.
The terms MW and MWh refer to megawatts
and megawatt-hours. The megawatt figures provided represent
nominal summer net megawatt capacity of power generated as
adjusted for the combined companys ownership position
excluding capacity from inactive/mothballed units as of
September 30, 2005. NRG has previously shown gross MWs when
presenting its operations. Capacity is tested following standard
industry practices. The combined companys numbers denote
saleable MWs net of internal/parasitic load. The term
expected annual baseload generation refers to the
net baseload capacity limited by economic factors (relationship
between cost of generation and market price) and reliability
factors (scheduled and unplanned outages). The MW and MWh
figures and other operational figures related to the combined
company only give pro forma effect to the Acquisition and the
Financing Transactions.
The closing of this offering is not conditioned on the
consummation of the Acquisition. While we expect that the
Acquisition will be consummated in or about the first week of
February 2006, no assurance can be given that the Acquisition
will be completed in accordance with the anticipated timing or
at all. See Risk FactorsRisks Related to the
OfferingThere can be no assurance that the Acquisition
will be consummated in accordance with the anticipated timing or
at all, and the closing of this offering is not conditioned on
the consummation of the Acquisition. If the Acquisition is not
consummated, NRGs common stock will not reflect any actual
or anticipated interest in Texas Genco, and if the Acquisition
is delayed, this interest will not be reflected during the
period of delay. For more information regarding the
business and operations of NRG, see Incorporation of
Certain Documents by Reference and Where You Can
Find More Information.
We are a leading wholesale power generation company with a
significant presence in many of the major competitive power
markets in the United States. We are primarily engaged in the
ownership and operation of power generation facilities,
purchasing fuel and transportation services to support our power
plant operations, and the marketing of energy, capacity and
related products in the competitive markets in which we operate.
As of September 30, 2005, the combined company would have
had a total global portfolio of 235 operating generation units
at 62 power generation plants, with an aggregate generation
capacity of approximately 25,041 MW. Within the United States,
the combined company will have one of the largest and most
diversified power generation portfolios with approximately
23,124 MW of generation capacity in 213 generating units at 54
plants as of September 30, 2005. These power generation
facilities are primarily located in our core regions in the
Electric Reliability Council of Texas, or ERCOT, market
(approximately 11,119 MW), and in the Northeast (approximately
7,099 MW), South Central (approximately 2,395 MW) and Western
(approximately 1,044 MW) regions of the United States. Our
facilities consist primarily of baseload, intermediate and
peaking power generation facilities, which we refer to as the
merit order, and also include thermal energy production and
energy resource recovery plants. The sale of capacity and power
from baseload generation facilities accounts for the majority of
our revenues and provides a stable source of cash flow. In
addition, our diverse generation portfolio provides us with
opportunities to capture additional revenues by selling power
into our core regions during periods of peak demand, offering
capacity or similar products to retail electric providers and
others, and providing ancillary services to support system
reliability.
Our Strategy
Our strategy is to increase the value of, and extract maximum
value from, our generation assets while using that asset base as
a platform for enhanced financial performance which can be
sustained and expanded upon the in years to come. We plan to
maintain and enhance our position as a leading wholesale power
generation company in the United States in a cost effective and
risk mitigating manner in order to serve the
S-49
bulk power requirements of our customer base and other entities
who offer load, or otherwise consume wholesale electricity
products and services in bulk. Our strategy includes the
following elements:
Increase value from our existing assets. Following
the Acquisition, we believe that we will have a highly
diversified portfolio of power generation assets in terms of
region, fuel type and dispatch levels. We will continue to focus
on extracting value from our portfolio by improving plant
performance, reducing costs and harnessing our advantages of
scale in the procurement of fuels: a strategy that we have
branded FORNRG, or Focus on ROIC@NRG.
Pursue intrinsic growth opportunities at existing sites in
our core regions. We believe that we are favorably
positioned to pursue growth opportunities through expansion of
our existing generating capacity. We intend to invest in our
existing assets through plant improvements, repowering and
brownfield development to meet anticipated regional requirements
for new capacity. We expect that these efforts will provide more
efficient energy, lower our delivered cost, expand our
electricity production capability and improve our ability to
dispatch economically across the merit order.
Maintain financial strength and flexibility. We
remain focused on increasing cash flow and maintaining liquidity
and balance sheet strength in order to ensure continued access
to capital for growth; enhancing risk-adjusted returns; and
providing flexibility in executing our business strategy. We
intend to continue our focus on maintaining operational and
financial controls designed to ensure that our financial
position remains strong.
Reduce the volatility of our cash flows through
asset-based commodity hedging activities. We will
continue to execute asset-based risk management, hedging,
marketing and trading strategies within well-defined risk and
liquidity guidelines in order to manage the value of our
physical and contractual assets. Our marketing and hedging
philosophy is centered on generating stable returns from our
portfolio of power generation assets while preserving the
ability to capitalize on strong spot market conditions and to
capture the extrinsic value of our portfolio. We believe that we
can successfully execute this strategy by leveraging our
expertise in marketing power and ancillary services, our
knowledge of markets, our flexible financial structure and our
diverse portfolio of power generation assets.
Participate in continued industry consolidation.
We will continue to pursue selective acquisitions, joint
ventures and divestitures to enhance our asset mix and
competitive position in our core regions to meet the fuel and
dispatch requirements in these regions. We intend to concentrate
on acquisition and joint venture opportunities that present
attractive risk-adjusted returns. We will also opportunistically
pursue other strategic transactions, including mergers,
acquisitions or divestitures during the consolidation of the
power generation industry in the United States.
Our Competitive Strengths
Scale and diversity of assets. The combined
company will have one of the largest and most diversified power
generation portfolios in the United States with approximately
23,124 MW of generation capacity in 213 generating units at 54
plants as of September 30, 2005. Our power generation
assets will be diversified by fuel type, dispatch level and
region, which will help mitigate the risks associated with fuel
price volatility and market demand cycles. The combined
companys U.S. baseload facilities, which will consist of
approximately 8,558 MW of generation capacity measured as of
September 30, 2005, will provide the combined company with
a significant source of stable cash flow, while the combined
companys intermediate and peaking facilities, with
approximately 14,566 MW of generation capacity as of
September 30, 2005, will provide the combined company with
opportunities to capture the significant upside potential that
can arise from time to time during periods of high demand. In
addition, approximately 10% of the combined companys
domestic generation facilities will have dual or multiple fuel
capability, which will allow most of these plants to dispatch
with the lowest cost fuel option.
S-50
The following chart demonstrates the diversification of the
combined companys generation assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate U.S. Portfolio Net |
|
Approximate U.S. Portfolio Net |
|
Approximate U.S. Portfolio Net |
Capacity By Fuel Type(1) |
|
Capacity By Dispatch Level |
|
Capacity By Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reflects only domestic generation capacity; 19 MW of
wood-fired generation capacity not shown. Also includes
461 MW of generation capacity from facilities that were
mothballed after September 30, 2005. |
Reliability of future cash flows. We have sold
forward a significant amount of our expected baseload generation
capacity for 2006 and 2007. As of September 30, 2005 the
combined company would have sold forward 68% of its baseload
generation in the Texas (ERCOT) market for 2006 through
2009. As of the same date, the combined company would have sold
approximately 83% of its expected annual baseload generation in
the Southeastern Electric Reliability Council/ Entergy, or
SERC Entergy, market for 2006 through 2009, and
approximately 70% of its expected annual baseload generation in
the Northeast region for 2006. In addition, as of
September 30, 2005, the combined company would have
purchased forward under fixed price contracts (with
contractually-specified price escalators) to provide fuel for
approximately 81% of its expected baseload coal generation
output from 2006 to 2009.
Favorable market dynamics for baseload power plants.
As of September 30, 2005, approximately 38% of the
combined companys domestic generation capacity would have
been fueled by coal or nuclear fuel. In many of the competitive
markets where we operate, the price of power typically is set by
the marginal costs of natural gas-fired and oil-fired power
plants that currently have substantially higher variable costs
than our solid fuel baseload power plants. For example, in the
ERCOT market, a 2004 report by Henwood found that natural
gas-fired power plants set the market price of power more than
90% of the time. As a result of our lower marginal cost for
baseload coal and nuclear generation assets, we expect such
assets to generate power nearly 100% of the time they are
available.
Locational advantages. Many of our generation
assets are located within densely populated areas that are
characterized by significant constraints on the transmission of
power from generators outside the region. Consequently, these
assets are able to benefit from the higher prices that prevail
for energy in these markets during periods of transmission
constraints. The combined company will have generation assets
located within New York City, southwestern Connecticut, Houston
and the Los Angeles and San Diego load basins, all areas with
constraints on the transmission of electricity. This allows us
to capture additional revenues through offering capacity to
retail electric providers and others, selling power at
prevailing market prices during periods of peak demand and
providing ancillary services in support of system reliability.
S-51
Generation Asset Overview
We have a significant power generation presence in many of the
major competitive power markets of the United States as set out
below:
Texas (ERCOT)
As of September 30, 2005, Texas Gencos generation
assets in the ERCOT market consisted of approximately 5,178 MW
of baseload generation assets and approximately 5,941 MW of
intermediate, cyclic and peaking natural gas-fired assets. We
expect that the combined company will realize a substantial
majority of its revenue and cash flow from the sale of power
from its three baseload power plants located in the ERCOT market
that use solid fuel: W. A. Parish (coal), Limestone
(lignite) and an undivided 44% interest in two nuclear
generation units at STP (nuclear fuel). Because plants are
generally dispatched in order of lowest operating cost, and, as
of September 30, 2005, approximately 73% of the net
generation capacity in the ERCOT market was natural gas-fired,
we expect these three baseload plants to operate nearly 100% of
the time (subject to planned and forced outages) due to their
low marginal costs relative to natural gas-fired plants.
The following table summarizes, as of September 30, 2005,
the ERCOT baseload forward power sales and natural gas swap
agreements that extend beyond December 31, 2005 and were
transacted through September 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Average for | |
|
Annual Average for | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
2006-2007 | |
|
2006-2010 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Baseload Capacity
(MW)(1)
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
5,340 |
|
|
|
5,340 |
|
|
|
5,340 |
|
|
|
5,340 |
|
|
|
5,317 |
|
|
|
5,331 |
|
Total Baseload Sales
(MW)(2)
|
|
|
4,274 |
|
|
|
4,271 |
|
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
3,428 |
|
|
|
1372 |
|
|
|
4,273 |
|
|
|
3,499 |
|
Total Available Baseload Capacity Sold Forward
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
Weighted Average Forward Price ($ per
MWh)(3)
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
Total Revenues Sold Forward ($ in millions)
|
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
|
$ |
1,445 |
|
|
$ |
1,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,434 |
|
|
$ |
621 |
|
|
$ |
1,553 |
|
|
$ |
1,333 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Net Baseload Capacity represents nominal summer net megawatt
capacity of power generation adjusted for ownership, known
upgrades and excluding capacity from mothballed units as of
September 30, 2005. Capacity verification is based upon
independent system operator, or ISO, required annual or
semi-annual testing requirements. |
S-52
|
|
(2) |
Includes amounts under fixed price firm and non-firm power sales
contracts and amounts financially hedged under natural gas swap
contracts. The forward natural gas swap quantities are reflected
in equivalent MW and are derived by first dividing the quantity
of MMBtu of natural gas hedged by the forward market heat rate
(in MMBtu/ MWh, mid-point of the bid and offer as quoted by
brokers in the market of the relevant Electric Reliability
Council of Texas zones as of September 19, 2005) to arrive
at the equivalent MWh hedged which is then divided by 8,760 to
arrive at MW hedged. |
|
(3) |
Includes amounts under fixed price power sales contracts and
amounts financially hedged under natural gas swap contracts. |
Northeast
As of September 30, 2005, approximately 7,099 MW of
NRGs generation capacity consisted of power plants in the
Northeast region of the United States, including power plants
within the control areas of the New York Independent System
Operator, or NYISO, the ISO-New England, Inc., or ISO-NE, and
the PJM Interconnection L.L.C., or PJM. Certain of these assets
are located in transmission constrained areas, including
approximately 1,394 MW of in-city New York City generation
capacity and approximately 538 MW of southwest Connecticut
generation capacity. As of September 30, 2005, NRGs
generation assets in the Northeast region consisted of
approximately 1,876 MW of baseload generation assets and
approximately 5,223 MW of intermediate and peaking assets.
South Central
As of September 30, 2005, NRG owned approximately 2,395 MW
of generation capacity in the South Central region of the United
States, making NRG the third largest generator in the
Southeastern Electric Reliability Council/ Entergy, or
SERC-Entergy, region. As of September 30, 2005, NRGs
generation assets in the South Central region consisted of
approximately 1,489 MW of baseload generation assets and 906 MW
of intermediate and peaking assets. As of September 30,
2005, approximately 2,140 MW of NRGs generation capacity
in the region was sold forward pursuant to long-term contracts.
NRGs primary asset is the Big Cajun II coal-fired plant
near Baton Rouge, where NRG has approximately 1,489 MW of
generation capacity as of September 30, 2005.
Western
As of September 30, 2005, NRGs assets in the Western
Electricity Coordinating Council, or WECC, the power market for
the West Coast of the United States, included approximately
1,044 MW of generation capacity, most of it in NRGs 50%
interest in WCP Holdings. As of September 30, 2005,
NRGs generation assets in the Western region consisted of
approximately 1,044 MW of intermediate and peaking assets. As
part of NRGs strategy of optimizing NRGs asset base,
NRG retired approximately 265 MW of additional gross generation
capacity at the Long Beach generating facility on
January 1, 2005. On December 27, 2005, NRG entered
into a purchase and sale agreement to acquire Dynegys 50%
ownership interest in WCP Holdings to become the sole owner of
power plants totaling approximately 1,800 MW of generation
capacity in the Western region. The transaction, which is
subject to regulatory approval, is expected to close in the
first quarter of 2006.
We plan to continue the operations of the existing plants and
also to redevelop our sites with new facilities when economic,
market and regulatory conditions are favorable. However, in the
alternative, we also believe we could recover our investment by
selling or redeveloping the properties for other uses.
Other
As of September 30, 2005, NRG had net ownership in
approximately 1,467 MW of additional generating capacity in the
United States. In addition to these traditional power generation
facilities, NRG also owns thermal and chilled water businesses
that generate approximately 1,225 MW thermal equivalents, as
well as resource recovery facilities, as described below. NRG
also owned, as of September 30, 2005, interests in power
plants having a generation capacity of approximately 1,916 MW in
Australia, Germany and Brazil, and interests in coal mines in
Australia and Germany.
S-53
Power Marketing and Commercial Operations
We seek to maximize profitability and manage cash flow
volatility through the marketing, trading and sale of energy,
capacity and ancillary services into spot, intermediate and
long-term markets and through the active management and trading
of emissions credits, fuel supplies and transportation-related
services. The combined company will perform its own power
marketing, which is focused on maximizing value and managing
volatility through asset-based power and fuel marketing and
trading activities in the spot, intermediate and long-term
markets. Our principal objectives are the realization of the
full market value of our asset base, including the capture of
our extrinsic value, the management and mitigation of commodity
market risk and the reduction of cash flow volatility over time.
We enter into power sales and hedging arrangements via a wide
range of products and contracts, including power purchase
agreements, fuel supply contracts, capacity auctions, natural
gas swap agreements and other financial instruments. The power
purchase agreements we enter into require us to deliver MWh of
power to our counterparties. Natural gas swap agreements and
other financial instruments hedge the price we will receive for
power to be delivered in the future.
As of September 30, 2005, the combined company, after
giving effect to the Acquisition and Financing Transactions, had
collateral (including cash, letters of credit and junior liens)
posted to support commercial operations totaling
$3.66 billion. The following table summarizes, as of
September 30, 2005, the combined company collateral posted
by credit rating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Letters of Credit(2) | |
|
Cash(2) | |
|
Junior Liens | |
|
Collateral Posted | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
A- and above
|
|
$ |
633,034,400 |
|
|
$ |
570,323,548 |
|
|
$ |
2,179,220,554 |
|
|
$ |
3,382,578,502 |
|
BBB- through BBB+
|
|
$ |
167,349,108 |
|
|
$ |
54,210,141 |
|
|
$ |
1,739,911 |
|
|
$ |
223,299,160 |
|
Below BBB-
|
|
$ |
7,771,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,895,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
11,666,000 |
|
Not
Rated(1)
|
|
$ |
38,201,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,968,992 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
41,196,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
846,355,508 |
|
|
$ |
631,397,681 |
|
|
$ |
2,180,960,464 |
|
|
$ |
3,658,713,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Not Rated indicates that no rating has been issued, or that an
external rating agency (for example, Standard &
Poors or Moodys) does not rate a particular
obligation as a matter of policy. The Not Rated row above
consists of collateral posted to 17 counterparties, mainly gas
producers. |
|
(2) |
As of September 30, 2005 WCP had collateral posted of
$24.6 million, which is excluded from the table above. Of
this amount, letters of credit totaled $10.7 million and
cash totaled $13.9 million. |
Fuel Supply and Transportation
Our fuel requirements consist primarily of nuclear fuel and
various forms of fossil fuel including oil, natural gas and coal
(including lignite). We obtain our oil, natural gas and coal
from multiple sources. Although fossil fuels are generally
available for purchase, localized shortages, transportation
availability and supplier financial stability issues can and do
occur. The prices of oil, natural gas and coal are subject to
macro- and micro-economic forces that can change dramatically in
both the short-term and the long-term. We are largely hedged for
our domestic coal consumption over the next few years. Coal
hedging is dynamic based on forecasted generation and market
volatility.
We arrange for the purchase, transportation and delivery of coal
for our baseload coal plants via a range of coal purchase
agreements, rail transportation agreements and rail car lease
arrangements. Coal consumption in 2006 for the combined company
is expected to be approximately 36 million tons, which
would rank it as one of the top five coal purchasers in the
United States. In addition, as of September 30, 2005,
approximately 92% of the combined companys coal-fired
generation would have benefited from multiple sourcing and
transportation alternatives. As of September 30, 2005, on a
pro forma basis, the combined company would have had
approximately 6,000 privately leased or owned rail cars in its
transportation fleet. In addition, we intend to enter into
contracts for delivery of an additional 2,695 rail cars within
the next two years of which approximately 1,410 will replace a
portion of our existing rail car fleet. The combined company has
entered into rail transportation agreements that provide for
substantially all of its rail transportation requirements
through 2009.
S-54
STP satisfies its fuel supply requirements by acquiring uranium
concentrates and contracting for conversion of the uranium
concentrates into uranium hexafluoride, for enrichment of
uranium hexafluoride and for fabrication of nuclear fuel
assemblies. Texas Genco is party to a number of contracts
covering a portion of the fuel requirements of STP for uranium,
conversion and enrichment services and fuel fabrication. The
table below summarizes the nuclear fuel situation at STP through
the major processes:
|
|
|
|
|
Process |
|
Supplier(s) |
|
Procurement Status |
|
|
|
|
|
Yellow cake U
3
O
8
(30-40% of total fuel cost)
Conversion to uranium hexafluoride (UF
6
) (3-5% of total fuel cost)
|
|
Contracts with Cameco (Canada) and Cogema/Arriba (France)
combine these steps.
|
|
100% covered under favorable contracts through mid-2011 and then
25% covered through 2021.
|
Enrichment of U235 content (35-45%)
|
|
Urenco (Germany), Cogema/Arriba (France), Louisiana Enrichment
Services, or
LES(1)
(joint venture between Westinghouse & Urenco).
|
|
Urenco and Cogema contracts cover through mid-2008. Balance of
current license period under contract with Urenco/LES.
|
Fabrication of fuel rods (15-20%)
|
|
Westinghouse.
|
|
Contract covers life of operating license.
|
|
|
(1) |
Enrichment by LES assumes successful completion of LES licensing
and construction of facility in New Mexico. |
Credit Support and Collateral Arrangements
In order to secure performance under our power purchase
agreements, fuel supply contracts and hedging agreements, we are
required to provide credit support to our counterparties from
time to time. This credit support consists of a combination of
letters of credit, cash, guarantees and junior liens on our
assets. For a detailed description of our collateral
arrangements, see Description of Certain
Indebtedness and Liquidity and Capital Resources
Discussion.
Significant Customers
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the combined
company derived approximately 52% of its total revenues from
majority-owned operations from four customers: NYISO accounted
for 19%, a subsidiary of Reliant Energy, Inc. accounted for 17%,
BP Energy Company accounted for 9% and ISO-NE accounted for 7%.
The combined company accounts for the revenues attributable to
these customers as part of its North America power generation
segment.
ISO-NE and NYISO are ISOs or RTOs and are FERC-regulated
entities that administer day-ahead and real-time energy markets,
capacity and ancillary service markets and manage transmission
assets collectively under their respective control to provide
non-discriminatory access to the transmission grid. We
anticipate that NYISO and ISO-NE will continue to be significant
customers given the scale of our asset base in these areas.
Plant Operations
We provide overall support services to our generation facilities
to ensure that high-level performance goals are developed, best
practices are shared and resources are appropriately balanced
and allocated to get the best results for us. Performance goals
are set for equivalent forced outage rates, or EFOR,
availability, procurement costs, operating costs and safety.
The functional areas included in this organization include
safety and security, engineering, project management,
construction services, and purchasing. These services also
include overall facilities management, operations strategic
planning and the development and dissemination of consistent
policies and practices relating to plant operations.
Between 2002 and 2007, NRG has made, and will continue to make,
investments that we believe will total approximately
$125 million in its coal-fired plants in the Northeast
region of the United States so that they can burn low sulfur
coal from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Montana. These
improvements have not only led to significant reductions in
sulfur dioxide emissions, but also improved the operational
flexibility and financial performance of these plants. During
the same time period, NRG will invest approximately
$32 million in its coal plants in the South Central region
for NOx burners and over fired air,
S-55
which have led to reductions in
NOx.
A significant portion of this investment may be recovered from
NRGs cooperative customers. Texas Genco has spent over
$700 million on
NOx
reduction initiatives since 1999 to ensure both regulatory
compliance and continued performance.
The following table summarizes the key existing and planned
environmental controls on our coal-fired units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SO2 | |
|
NOx | |
|
Hg | |
|
Particulate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Install | |
|
|
|
Install | |
|
|
|
Install | |
|
Control | |
|
Install | |
Units |
|
Control Equipment | |
|
Date | |
|
Control Equipment | |
|
Date | |
|
Control Equipment | |
|
Date | |
|
Equipment | |
|
Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Huntley 67
|
|
|
Wet FGD(1) |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
SNCR |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
FF-ACI(2) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
ESP |
|
|
|
1973 |
|
Huntley 68
|
|
|
Wet FGD(1) |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
SNCR |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
FF-ACI(2) |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
ESP |
|
|
|
1973 |
|
Dunkirk 1
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SNCR |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
FF-ACI(2) |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
ESP |
|
|
|
1974 |
|
Dunkirk 2
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SNCR |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
FF-ACI(2) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
ESP |
|
|
|
1974 |
|
Dunkirk 3
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SNCR |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
FF-ACI(2) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
ESP |
|
|
|
1975 |
|
Dunkirk 4
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SNCR |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
FF-ACI(2) |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
ESP |
|
|
|
1976 |
|
Indian River 1
|
|
|
In-Duct Scrubber |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
SNCR & LNB(3) |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Co-Benefit of Scrubbers |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
ESP (IR1-3) |
|
|
|
1976 |
|
Indian River 2
|
|
|
In-Duct Scrubber |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
SNCR & LNB(3) |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Co-Benefit of Scrubbers |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
ESP (IR1-3) |
|
|
|
1976 |
|
Indian River 3
|
|
|
In-Duct Scrubber |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
LNB(3) & SNCR upgrade |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Co-Benefit of Scrubbers |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
ESP (IR1-3) |
|
|
|
1980 |
|
Indian River 4
|
|
|
Dry Scrubber |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
LNB(3) & SNCR upgrade |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Co-Benefit of Scrubbers |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
ESP (IR1-3) |
|
|
|
1980 |
|
Big Cajun 2 U1
|
|
|
Dry Scrubber |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACI(2) |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
ESP |
|
|
|
1981 |
|
Big Cajun 2 U2
|
|
|
Dry Scrubber |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
SCR(4) |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
ACI(2) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
ESP |
|
|
|
1981 |
|
Big Cajun 2 U3
|
|
|
Dry Scrubber |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
SCR(4) |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
ACI(2) |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
ESP |
|
|
|
1983 |
|
Limestone
|
|
|
FGD |
|
|
|
1986-87 |
|
|
|
LNB/OFA(3) |
|
|
|
2000-01 |
|
|
|
Co-Benefit of Scrubbers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESP |
|
|
|
1986-87 |
|
WA Parish U 5-7
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
SCR & LNB/OFA(3) |
|
|
|
2000-04 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FF |
|
|
|
1988 |
|
WA Parish U 8
|
|
|
FGD |
|
|
|
1982 |
|
|
|
SCR & LNB/OFA(3) |
|
|
|
2000-04 |
|
|
|
Co-Benefit of Scrubber |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FF |
|
|
|
1988 |
|
|
|
(1) |
FGD stands for Flue Gas Desulfurization |
(2) |
FF-ACI stands for Fabric Filter with Activated Carbon Injection |
(3) |
LNB/ OFA stands for Low NOx Burner with Over Fire Air |
(4) |
SCR stands for Selective Catalytic Reduction |
Performance Improvement and Cost and Process Control
Initiatives
In 2005, NRG introduced a comprehensive, company-wide cost and
revenue enhancement program with the goal of increasing its
return on invested capital, or ROIC. This effort has been
branded as FORNRG, or Focus on ROIC@NRG.
Projects are focused on improving plant performance, reducing
purchasing and other costs and streamlining processes. A large
number of initiatives are currently underway in plants and
regional and headquarters operations including forced outage
reductions and heat rate improvements at NRGs major base
load facilities.
There have been a number of parallel improvement programs
underway at Texas Genco which have focused on streamlining
processes, right sizing the organization and running efficient
operations. Discussions are already underway to compare best
practices and results between NRG and Texas Genco, to manage
suppliers with our combined volumes and to incorporate existing
and future Texas Genco processes under the FORNRG program.
Regional Business Descriptions
The combined company will be organized into business units as
described below, with each of our core regions operating as a
separate unit.
S-56
The combined companys largest business unit will be
located in the Texas (ERCOT) region of the United States
and will be comprised of investments in generation facilities
located in the physical control areas of the
ERCOT-ISO.
Texas Gencos business in the ERCOT region is comprised of
two fundamental sets of assets: a regionally diverse set of
three large solid-fuel baseload plants, and a set of generally
older gas-fired plants located in and around Houston. Our
operating strategy to maximize value and opportunity across
these two sets of assets will be four pronged: (1) to
ensure the availability of the baseload plants to fulfill their
commercial obligations given the long-term forward sales already
in place, (2) to manage the gas assets for profitability
while ensuring the reliability and flexibility of power supply
to the Houston market, (3) to take advantage of our skill
sets and market/regulatory knowledge to grow the business
through incremental capacity uprates and brownfield development
of solid-fuel baseload units and (4) to play a leading role
in the development of the ERCOT market by active membership and
participation in market and regulatory issues.
Given our strategy of selling forward up to 80% of Texas
Gencos solid-fuel baseload capacity under long-term
contracts, our primary focus will be to keep Texas Gencos
solid-fuel baseload units running. The performances at STP, W.
A. Parish and Limestone have been above broader industry
averages for the recent
five-year period as
shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average 5-Year | |
|
|
|
|
Availability | |
|
Benchmark Average | |
|
|
Factor | |
|
Availability Factor | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Limestone
|
|
|
89.4 |
|
|
|
85.4 |
|
W. A. Parish
|
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
|
83.6 |
|
South Texas Project
|
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
|
88.9 |
|
The operations and maintenance teams will continue to focus on
maintaining and improving these levels.
On the gas-fired asset side, we will continue a dual path of
contracting forward a significant portion of gas-fired capacity
one to two years out while holding a portion for back-up in case
there is an operational issue with one of the baseload units.
For the gas-fired capacity sold forward, Texas Genco offers a
range of products including virtual units where the
customer has the right to dispatch Texas Gencos capacity
as the customer needs in order to meet their physical load
requirements. For the gas-fired capacity that we will continue
to sell commercially into the market, we will focus on making
this capacity available to the market whenever it is economic to
run.
Texas Gencos growth efforts to date have been focused on
adding incremental capacity to existing units such as the
99 MW uprate at Limestone 2 in the spring of 2006. We will
continue this effort with exploration of some additional
potential opportunities at W. A. Parish as well as some
scheduled uprates at STP. We have also launched a broader
brownfield development initiative where we will evaluate
opportunities to take advantage of our current power plant sites
and other land we own as well as our deep market, regulatory,
and environmental knowledge to consider the development of new
solid fuel baseload units.
Lastly, we believe that we can have a positive impact on the
evolution of the regulatory environment and market structure in
Texas. We take our responsibility to the market and the state
seriously and will be focused on working broadly with the full
suite of stakeholders including other market participants, the
PUCT, ERCOT, and the legislature to make Texas attractive for
energy infrastructure investment in a way that ensures
reliability and increases stability.
S-57
The following table describes Texas Gencos electric power
generation plants and generation capacity as of
September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity | |
|
|
Generation Sites |
|
Location | |
|
% Owned | |
|
(MW)(1) | |
|
Primary Fuel Type(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Solid Fuel Baseload Units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. A.
Parish(3)
|
|
|
Thompsons, TX |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
2,463 |
|
|
Low Sulfur Coal Lignite/Low Sulfur |
Limestone
|
|
|
Jewett, TX |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
Coal |
|
South Texas
Project(4)
|
|
|
Bay City, TX |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
Nuclear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Solid Fuel Baseload
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Natural Gas-Fired Units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cedar Bayou
|
|
|
Chambers County, TX |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,498 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
T. H. Wharton
|
|
|
Houston, TX |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
W. A. Parish (Natural
gas)(3)
|
|
|
Thompsons, TX |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
S. R. Bertron
|
|
|
Deer Park, TX |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Greens Bayou
|
|
|
Houston, TX |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
P.H.
Robinson(5)
|
|
|
Bacliff, TX |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
San Jacinto
|
|
|
LaPorte, TX |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Natural Gas-Fired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Texas (ERCOT) Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Actual capacity can vary depending on factors including weather
conditions, operational conditions and other factors. ERCOT
requires periodic demonstration of capability, and the capacity
may vary individually and in the aggregate from time to time.
Excludes 3,378 MW of inactive capacity available for
redevelopment of which 174 MW of available capacity was sold on
November 14, 2005. An additional 461 MW was moved to
inactive status after September 30, 2005. |
|
(2) |
Low sulfur coal is coal mined from the Powder River Basin, a
coal-producing area in northeastern Wyoming and southeastern
Montana, which coal has low sulfur content relative to most coal
from the eastern United States. |
|
(3) |
W. A. Parish has nine units, four of which are baseload
coal-fired units and five of which are natural gas-fired units. |
|
(4) |
Generation capacity figure consists of our 44.0% undivided
interest in the two units of STP. |
|
(5) |
P.H. Robinson Unit 2 was placed into inactive status on
October 29, 2005. |
W. A. Parish. Texas Gencos W. A. Parish plant is
one of the largest fossil-fired plants in the United States
based on total MWs of generation capacity. The plant is located
in the Houston ERCOT zone and was recognized by Platts
Power Magazine as one of the top power plants in the United
States for 2004. This plants power generation units
include four coal-fired steam generation units with an aggregate
generation capacity of 2,463 MW as of September 30, 2005.
Two of these units are 649 MW steam units that were placed in
commercial service in December 1977 and December 1978,
respectively. The other two units are 555 MW and 610 MW steam
units that were placed in commercial service in June 1980 and
December 1982, respectively. All four units are serviced by two
competing railroads that diversify Texas Gencos coal
transportation options at competitive prices. Texas Genco has
invested approximately $430.0 million in nitrogen oxide, or
NOx,
control systems from 1999 to 2004. Each of the four coal-fired
units has
low-NOx
burners and selective catalytic reduction, or SCR, installed to
reduce
NOx
emissions. In addition, W. A. Parish Unit 8 has a scrubber
installed to reduce sulfur dioxide, or
SO2,
emissions. Plant uprate projects to be completed by year end
2007 are expected to uprate the net generation capacity of W.A.
Parish by 31 MW.
S-58
Limestone. Texas Gencos Limestone plant is a
lignite and coal-fired plant located approximately 140 miles
northwest of Houston. This plant includes two steam generation
units with an aggregate generation capacity of 1,614 MW as of
September 30, 2005. The first unit is an 836 MW steam unit
that was placed in commercial service in December 1985. The
second unit is a 778 MW steam unit that was placed in commercial
service in December 1986. Limestone primarily burns lignite from
an on-site mine, but also burns low sulfur coal and petroleum
coke. This serves to lower average fuel costs by eliminating
fuel transportation costs, which can represent up to two-thirds
of delivered fuel costs for plants of this type. Texas Genco
owns the mining equipment and facilities and a portion of the
lignite reserves located at the mine. Mining operations are
conducted by Texas Westmoreland Coal Co., a single purpose,
wholly-owned subsidiary of Westmoreland Coal Company and the
owner of a substantial portion of the remaining lignite
reserves. Both units have installed low-NOx burners to reduce
NOx
emissions and scrubbers to reduce
SO2
emissions. We plan to upgrade Limestone Unit 2 in the second
quarter of 2006 by replacing the high pressure and intermediate
pressure turbines, rewinding the generator and replacing the
main generator step-up transformer. These upgrades are expected
to cost approximately $33.0 million and are expected to
increase the generation capacity by 99 MW.
South Texas Project Electric Generating Station. STP is
one of the newest and largest nuclear-powered generation plants
in the United States based on total megawatts of generation
capacity. This plant is located approximately 90 miles south of
downtown Houston, near Bay City, Texas and consists of two
generation units each representing approximately 1,250 MW of
generation capacity. Plant upgrade projects to be completed by
2007 are expected to uprate the net generation capacity of STP
by 74 MW (33 MW net to Texas Genco). STPs two
generation units commenced operations in August 1988 and June
1989, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2004,
STP had a forced outage rate of 0.4% and a 97% capacity factor.
STP is currently owned as a tenancy in common among Texas Genco
and two other co-owners. Texas Genco owns a 44.0% (1,101 MW)
interest in STP, the City of San Antonio owns a 40% interest and
the City of Austin owns the remaining 16% interest. Each
co-owner retains its undivided ownership interest in the two
nuclear-fueled generation units and the electrical output from
those units. Except for certain plant shutdown and
decommissioning costs and NRC licensing liabilities, Texas Genco
is severally liable, but not jointly liable, for the expenses
and liabilities of STP. CenterPoint Energy, Inc., the prior
owner of Texas Gencos assets, and the other three original
co-owners organized the South Texas Project Nuclear Operating
Company, or STPNOC, to operate and maintain STP. STPNOC is
managed by a board of directors composed of one director
appointed by each of the three co-owners, along with the chief
executive officer of STPNOC. STPNOC is the NRC-licensed operator
of STP. No single owner controls STPNOC and all decisions must
be approved by two or more owners who collectively control more
than 60% of the interests. Due to the fact that Texas Genco owns
44% of STP, Texas Genco effectively holds a veto right.
In connection with the acquisition by Texas Genco of 13.2% of
STP from AEP, Texas Genco, LP agreed with AEP that, for a period
of ten years from May 19, 2005, Texas Genco, LP would
maintain a minimum partners equity, determined in
accordance with GAAP, of $300 million. This obligation will
remain in effect after the closing of the Acquisition.
The two STP generation units operate under licenses granted by
the NRC that expire in 2027 and 2028, respectively. These
licenses may be extended for additional 20-year terms if the
project satisfies NRC requirements. Adequate provisions exist
for long-term on-site storage of spent nuclear fuel throughout
the remaining life of the existing STP plant licenses.
The ERCOT market is one of the nations largest and fastest
growing power markets. It represents approximately 85% of the
demand for power in Texas and covers the whole state, with the
exception of the far west (El Paso), a large part of the Texas
Panhandle and two small areas in the eastern part of the state.
From 1994 through 2004, peak hourly demand in the ERCOT market
grew at a compound annual rate of 3.0%, compared to a compound
annual rate of growth of 2.1% in the United States for the same
period. For 2004, hourly demand ranged from a low of 20,276 MW
to a high of 58,506 MW. ERCOT has limited
S-59
interconnectionscurrently limited to 856 MW of generation
capacityto other markets in the United States, and
wholesale transactions within ERCOT are not subject to
regulation by FERC. Any wholesale producer of power that
qualifies as a power generation company under the Texas electric
restructuring law and that can access the ERCOT electric power
grid is allowed to sell power in the ERCOT market at unregulated
rates.
The ERCOT market has experienced significant construction of new
generation plants in recent years, with over 20,000 MW of mostly
natural gas-fired combined cycle generation capacity added to
the market since 2000. As of September 30, 2005, aggregate
net generation capacity of approximately 81,000 MW existed in
the ERCOT market, of which 73% was natural gas-fired.
Approximately 20,000 MW, or 25%, was lower marginal cost
generation capacity such as coal, lignite and nuclear plants.
Texas Gencos coal and nuclear fuel baseload plants
represented approximately 5,178 MW, or 26%, of the total solid
fuel baseload net generation capacity in the ERCOT market in
2004. ERCOT has established a target equilibrium reserve margin
level of approximately 12.5%. Reserve margins will decrease to
the extent demand growth exceeds new supply. Overcapacity from
new construction could cause some less efficient natural
gas-fired units to be retired or mothballed. Overcapacity has
little impact on the dispatch of Texas Gencos solid fuel
baseload plants given their lower marginal cost relative to
natural gas-fired assets.
In the ERCOT market, buyers and sellers enter into bilateral
wholesale capacity, power and ancillary services contracts or
may participate in the centralized ancillary services market,
including balancing energy, which ERCOT administers. In the
ERCOT market, a 2004 report by Henwood found that natural
gas-fired plants have set the market price of wholesale power
more than 90% of the time. As a result, Texas Gencos lower
marginal cost solid-fuel baseload plants are expected to
generate power nearly 100% of the time they are available.
The ERCOT market is divided into five regions or congestion
zones (Northeast, North, Houston, South and West), which reflect
transmission constraints that limit the amount of power that can
flow across zones. Texas Gencos W. A. Parish plant and all
its natural gas-fired plants are located in the Houston zone,
Texas Gencos Limestone plant is located in the North zone
and STP is located in the South zone.
The ERCOT market operates under the reliability standards set by
the North American Electric Reliability Council, or NERC. The
PUCT has primary jurisdiction over the ERCOT market to ensure
the adequacy and reliability of power supply across Texas
main interconnected power transmission grid. ERCOT is
responsible for facilitating reliable operations of the bulk
electric power supply system in the ERCOT market. Its
responsibilities include ensuring that power production and
delivery are accurately accounted for among the generation
resources and wholesale buyers and sellers. Unlike power pools
with independent operators in other regions of the country, the
ERCOT market is not a centrally dispatched power pool and ERCOT
does not procure power on behalf of its members other than to
maintain the reliable operations of the transmission system. The
ERCOT-ISO also serves as agent for procuring ancillary services
for those who elect not to provide their own ancillary services.
Power sales or purchases from one location to another may be
constrained by the power transfer capability between locations.
Under current ERCOT protocol, the commercially significant
constraints and the transfer capabilities along these paths are
reassessed every year and congestion costs are directly assigned
to those parties causing the congestion. This has the potential
to increase power generators exposure to the congestion
costs associated with transferring power between zones.
The PUCT has adopted a rule directing the ERCOT-ISO to develop
and implement a wholesale market design that, among other
things, includes a day ahead energy market and replaces the
existing zonal wholesale market design with a nodal market
design that is based on locational marginal prices for power.
See Regulatory Developments Regional
Businesses Market Developments Texas
(ERCOT) Region. One of the stated purposes of the
proposed market restructuring is to reduce local (intra-zonal)
transmission congestion costs. The market redesign project is
expected to take effect in 2009. We expect that implementation
of any new market design will require modifications to our
procedures and systems. Although we do not expect the combined
companys competitive position in the ERCOT market will be
materially adversely affected by the proposed market
restructuring, we do not know for certain how the planned market
S-60
restructuring will affect our revenues, and some of the combined
companys plants in ERCOT may experience adverse pricing
effects due to their location on the transmission grid.
PUCT Mandated Auctions
Because Texas Gencos generation assets were formerly owned
indirectly by a vertically integrated utility, PUCT regulation
required firm entitlements to 15% of Texas Gencos
operating installed generation capacity to be sold at auction
through December 31, 2006, at opening bid prices well below
Texas Gencos cost for 2006. On December 7, 2005,
Texas Genco filed an application with the PUCT requesting the
PUCT to determine that Texas Genco was no longer required to
conduct mandated auctions because 40% or more of the electric
power consumed by the residential and small commercial customers
within the CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC certificated
service area before the onset of customer choice is now provided
by nonaffiliated retail electric providers. A decision on this
matter is expected by February 2006. In the event the PUCT does
not grant Texas Gencos request, Texas Gencos
obligation to sell capacity at auction based on this below-cost
pricing will continue through December 31, 2006.
J. Aron Power Purchase
Agreement
Texas Genco entered into the J. Aron PPA with J. Aron. Under the
J. Aron PPA, Texas Genco sold forward, on a fixed price basis, a
substantial portion of its expected ERCOT generation capacity
beginning January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2010.
As a result of the J. Aron PPA and certain power sales and gas
swap transactions, approximately 26% of Texas Gencos net
baseload generation capacity in Texas, and approximately 16% of
the combined companys total net baseload capacity, as
measured in MWh through 2010, has been sold on a fixed price
basis to J. Aron, making J. Aron one of the combined
companys largest customers on a going forward basis.
The J. Aron PPA is a firm, liquidated damages contract. Texas
Genco has the flexibility of meeting its obligations to deliver
power to specified delivery points under the J. Aron PPA either
through sales of power from its plants, or through purchases of
power from the market. In addition, if either Limestone in the
North zone, or STP in the South zone, has an outage or is
derated, Texas Genco is permitted to deliver the power that it
is otherwise obligated to deliver in these zones into the
Houston zone in satisfaction of its obligations. All Texas
Gencos natural gas-fired plants are located in the Houston
zone. Additionally, under the J. Aron PPA, Texas Genco does not
assume any pricing risk associated with the ERCOT market
switching to a nodal pricing market design.
As collateral for Texas Gencos obligations under the J.
Aron PPA and certain power sales and gas swap transactions,
Texas Genco agreed to post letters of credit and grant a second
lien on Texas Gencos assets in favor of J. Aron. For a
detailed description of these credit support arrangements, see
Description of Certain Indebtedness. The obligations
of J. Aron under the J. Aron PPA and a subsequent natural gas
swap are supported by an unlimited guarantee from J. Arons
parent, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
In the event power prices decline in the future and J. Aron
fails to perform under the J. Aron PPA, Texas Genco would have
the right to terminate the J. Aron PPA and collect from J. Aron
an amount equal to the difference between the contract price and
the lower market price; however, Texas Gencos ability to
collect would be dependent on the amount of collateral then
posted and the creditworthiness of J. Aron and Goldman at the
time. Conversely, in the event power prices rise and Texas Genco
fails to perform, J. Aron would have the right to terminate and
collect an amount equal to the difference between the contract
price and the higher market price. In the event J. Aron
terminates, it would have the right to draw on certain letters
of credit Texas Genco has posted as collateral. To the extent
such letters of credit do not cover the amount of the
termination payment, J. Aron retains a second lien on Texas
Gencos assets as collateral. J. Arons right to
enforce its lien is limited to higher priority debt having taken
such action.
Six other trading counterparties have similar arrangements with
Texas Genco related to hedging agreements through
December 31, 2010 collateralized by letters of credit and a
retained second lien on the Texas Gencos assets. These
additional six counterparties comprise approximately 22% of
Texas Gencos net baseload capacity in Texas, and
approximately 13% of the combined companys total net
baseload capacity, as
S-61
measured in MWh through December 31, 2010. NRG expects
that, at the closing of the Acquisition and the Financing
Transactions, the collateral arrangements described above,
including with respect to certain counterparties holding junior
liens on the ERCOT assets, will remain in place or will be
replaced with substitute collateral arrangements comprising an
interest in a second lien position on substantially all of
NRGs assets. On a going forward basis, NRG intends to
secure some or all of its commodity hedging activities with
interests in a second lien position on substantially all of
NRGs assets. There can be no assurance that this second
lien position will provide enough capacity to cover all
commodity hedges that are necessary or desirable for adequately
hedging NRGs commodity risk. See Risk Factors
Risks Related to the Operation of our Business We may not
have sufficient liquidity to hedge market risks
effectively.
Joint Operating Agreement with
the City of San Antonio
Texas Genco has a joint operating agreement with the City Public
Service Board of San Antonio, or CPS, to jointly dispatch Texas
Gencos portfolio of generation units with CPSs
portfolio of over 5,300 MW of generation capacity as a joint
operating system. This agreement with CPS expires in 2009 and
can be terminated at any time by either party with 90 days
notice. Texas Genco has delivered a notice of termination to CPS
that would have terminated the agreement effective
December 31, 2005. However, the parties have since agreed
to a short term extension not expected to extend beyond January
2006.
The combined companys second largest asset base will be
located in the Northeast region of the United States and will be
comprised of investments in generation facilities primarily
located in the physical control areas of NYISO, the ISO-NE and
PJM.
Operating Strategy
The Northeast region strategy is focused on optimizing the value
of our broad and varied generation portfolio in three
interconnected and actively traded competitive markets: the
NYISO, the ISO-NE and
the PJM. In our Northeast markets, load serving entities
generally lack their own generation capacity, much of the
generation base is aging, and the current ownership of the
generation is highly disaggregated. In the Northeast, commodity
prices are more volatile on an as-delivered basis than in other
regions due to the distances and occasional physical constraints
impacting delivery of fuels into the region. In this
environment, we seek both to enhance our ability to be the low
cost wholesale generator capable of delivering wholesale power
to load centers within the region from multiple locations using
multiple fuel sources, and to be properly compensated for
delivering such wholesale power and related services.
We continue to pursue enhancement of coal assets through
continued low sulfur coal conversions, improvements in coal
handling and logistics process, and securing adequate coal
supplies and transportation commitments. Longer term, we are
also focused on working with regulators to gain support and
required permits for low sulfur coal conversions.
We continuously work to hedge our baseload portfolio and trade
our oil and gas peaking facilities to maximize their value and
minimize the risk of being fundamentally long on generation.
Several of our Connecticut assets are located in
transmission-constrained load pockets and have been designated
as required to be available to ISO-NE to ensure reliability.
These assets are subject to reliability must-run, or RMR,
agreements, which are contracts under which we agree to maintain
our facilities to be available to run when needed, and are paid
for providing these capability services based on our costs. As
discussed further below (see Regulatory
Developments Northeast Region RMR Agreements),
the RMR agreements are subject to approval by the FERC. In
addition to the Connecticut RMR agreements, we are focused on
capturing the locational value of our plants that are located in
or near load centers and inside chronic transmission
constraints, in order to improve the economic rationale for
repowering of those sites. We do this principally through the
advocacy of capacity market reforms, e.g., locational installed
capacity markets that generate adequate returns for wholesale
power generators.
S-62
We continue to evaluate opportunities to redevelop our existing
sites as well as opportunities for greenfield development and
acquisitions in the Northeast region. The redevelopment
opportunities for our existing sites include expanding sites
with high efficiency, intermediate and peaking units, converting
coal or oil sites to cleaner technologies, as well as
reconfiguring the existing sites to burn renewable fuel sources.
Redevelopment opportunities have been identified for each site
in the Northeast and we have established priorities based on
expected financial returns and probability of success. To
facilitate redevelopment opportunities, we are pursuing
contractual arrangements to support significant redevelopment
capital expenditures via direct negotiations with relevant
agencies and potential power purchasers as well as through
request for proposal processes. In addition to redeveloping
existing sites, we also have greenfield sites in the Northeast
that continue to be evaluated for power plant development
opportunities. We also continue to pursue contractual
arrangements to support the construction costs of potential new
facilities and acquisition opportunities through public auction
processes as well as by initiating discussions with various
parties on potential opportunities.
Facilities
As of September 30, 2005, NRGs facilities in the
Northeast region consisted of approximately 7,099 MW of
generation capacity, including assets located in transmission
constrained areas, such as in-city New York City (1,394 MW) and
southwest Connecticut (538 MW). The Northeast region power
generation assets as of September 30, 2005 are summarized
in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity | |
|
|
Plant |
|
Location | |
|
% Owned | |
|
(MW)* | |
|
Primary Fuel Type | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Oswego
|
|
|
Oswego, NY |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
Oil |
|
Arthur Kill
|
|
|
Staten Island, NY |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Middletown
|
|
|
Middletown, CT |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
Oil |
|
Indian River
|
|
|
Millsboro, DE |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
Coal |
|
Astoria Gas Turbines
|
|
|
Queens, NY |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Dunkirk
|
|
|
Dunkirk, NY |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
Coal |
|
Huntley
|
|
|
Tonawanda, NY |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
Coal |
|
Montville
|
|
|
Uncasville, CT |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
Oil |
|
Norwalk Harbor
|
|
|
So. Norwalk, CT |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
Oil |
|
Devon
|
|
|
Milford, CT |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Vienna
|
|
|
Vienna, MD |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
Oil |
|
Somerset Power
|
|
|
Somerset, MA |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
Coal |
|
Connecticut Remote
|
|
|
Various locations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbines
|
|
|
in CT |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
Oil |
|
Conemaugh
|
|
|
New Florence, PA |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
Coal |
|
Keystone
|
|
|
Shelocta, PA |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
Coal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Northeast Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Excludes 382 MW of inactive capacity. |
The following are descriptions of our most significant revenue
generating plants in the Northeast region:
Arthur Kill. NRGs Arthur Kill plant is a natural
gas-fired power plant consisting of three units and is located
on the west side of Staten Island, New York. The plant produces
an aggregate generation capacity of 841 MW from two intermediate
load units (Units 20 and 30) and one peak load unit (Unit GT-1).
Unit 20 produces an aggregate generation capacity of 335 MW and
was installed in 1959. Unit 30 produces an aggregate generation
capacity of 491 MW and was installed in 1969. Both Units 20 and
30 were converted from steam engines in the early 1990s. Unit
GT-1 produces an aggregate generation capacity of 15 MW and is
S-63
activated when ConEd issues a max generation alarm
on hot days and during thunderstorms. We may need to upgrade the
plant in the future to comply with environmental regulations. If
upgrades are needed it could cost several million dollars.
Astoria Gas Turbines. Adjacent to LaGuardia airport in
Queens, New York, NRGs Astoria Gas Turbine facility has an
aggregate generation capacity of 553 MW from 19 operational
combustion turbine engines. The turbine engines are peak
gas-fired and/or oil-fired installed in the early 1970s. The
engines are classified into three classes, which are then
grouped into ten Astoria Gas Turbine units. These units consist
of Buildings 2, 3 and 4, which have a net generation capacity of
144 MW each; Units 5, 7 and 8, which are Class 2 turbine
engines that have a net generation capacity of approximately 14
MW each; and Units 10, 11, 12 and 13, which are Class 3
turbine engines that have a net generation capacity of 20 MW
each. The ten units are further classified into six main
substation feeds, that provide power to the local New York City
load pockets. The Class 1 and Class 2 turbines were
installed in 1970 and the Class 3 turbines in 1971. The
facility contains retired units, including Units 6 and 9 in
Class 2. Units 5 through 8 and units 10 through 13 are
expected to retire in 2015, while Units 2 through 4 are expected
to be retired in 2022.
Dunkirk. NRGs Dunkirk plant is a coal-fired plant
located on Lake Erie in Dunkirk, New York. This plant produces
an aggregate generation capacity of 522 MW from four baseload
units. Units 1 and 2 produce up to 77 MW each and were put in
service in 1950. Units 3 and 4 produce approximately 180 MW each
and were put in service in 1959 and 1960, respectively. The
plant is currently implementing changes to switch from eastern
bituminous coal to low sulfur PRB coal in order to comply with
various federal and state emissions standards, as well as the
NYSDEC settlement referred to in the following paragraph.
Huntley. NRGs Huntley plant is a coal-fired plant
consisting of six units and is located in Tonawanda, New York,
approximately three miles north of Buffalo. The plant has a
generation capacity of 552 MW from two intermediate load units
(Units 65 and 66) and two baseload units (Units 67 and 68).
Units 67 and 68 generate a net capacity of approximately 190 MW
each and were put in service in 1957 and 1958, respectively.
Units 65 and 66 generate a net capacity of 85 MW each and were
put in service between 1942 and 1954. Units 63 and 64 are
inactive and were effectively retired at the end of 2004, and
NRG plans to give notice to the New York Public Service
Commission of its intent to retire Units 65 and 66 in early 2006
reducing the capacity at this site to approximately 380 MW. As
part of a settlement reached with the New York Department of
Environmental Conservation, or NYSDEC, in January 2005, NRG will
reduce NOx and SOx emissions from its Huntley and Dunkirk plants
through 2013 in the aggregate by over 80 percent and
86 percent, respectively. A large portion of these
reductions will be achieved by switching to low sulfur western
coal and related projects for which NRG has already expended or
committed significant capital.
Market Framework
Although each of the three northeast ISOs and their respective
energy markets are functionally, administratively and
operationally independent, they all follow, to a certain extent,
similar market designs. The ISO dispatches power plants to meet
system energy and reliability needs, and settles physical power
deliveries at locational marginal prices, or LMPs, which reflect
the value of energy at a specific location at the specific time
it is delivered. This value is determined by an ISO-administered
auction process, which evaluates and selects the least costly
supplier offers or bids to create a reliable and least-cost
dispatch. The ISO-sponsored LMP energy markets consists of two
separate and characteristically distinct settlement time frames.
The first is a security-constrained, financially firm, day-ahead
unit commitment market. The second is a security-constrained,
financially settled, real-time dispatch and balancing market.
Prices paid in these LMP energy markets, however, are affected
by, among other things, market mitigation measures which can
result in lower prices associated with certain generating units
that are mitigated because they are deemed to have locational
market power, and by $1000/ MWh energy market price caps that
are in place in all three northeast ISOs.
In addition to energy delivery, the ISOs manage secondary
markets for installed capacity, ancillary services and financial
transmission rights. All of the three northeastern ISOs have
realized, however, that they are not capable of supporting
needed investment in new generation without well designed
capacity and ancillary service markets. NYISOs capacity
market was the first to receive approval of its proposed demand
S-64
curve and locational capacity reforms (which are intended to
better reflect locational values of capacity resources). ISO-NE
and PJM are following with their respective versions of reformed
capacity markets, namely, a locational installed capacity
market, or LICAP in ISO-NE, and a reliability pricing model, or
RPM proposal in PJM. These proposals are currently pending
before FERC.
As of September 30, 2005, NRG owned approximately 2,395 MW
of generating capacity in the South Central region of the United
States, and had obligations to provide up to approximately 2,140
MW of capacity under long-term contracts with 11 rural
cooperatives that have terms extending in some cases through
2025. The region lacks a regional transmission organization, or
RTO/ ISO and, therefore, remains a bilateral market, making it
less efficient than a region with an RTO/ ISO-administered
energy market using large scale economic dispatch (such as the
Northeast markets discussed above). Our plants in the South
Central region operate as their own control area, the South
Central control area. As a result, the South Central control
area is capable of providing control area services, in addition
to wholesale power, that allow us to provide full requirement
services to load serving utilities, thus making the South
Central control area a competitive alternative to the integrated
utilities operating in the region.
Operating Strategy
Our South Central region seeks to capitalize on two factors: our
position as a significant coal-fired generator in a market which
is highly dependent on natural gas for power generation
purposes; and our long-term contractual and historical service
relationship with 11 rural cooperatives around Louisiana.
As part of our strategy, we are examining all of our sites in
the South Central region for possible brownfield development. In
particular, we continue the development of the new 675 MW Big
Cajun II Unit 4 super critical coal-fired generating unit. On
August 22, 2005, NRG received the Title V Air Permit
from the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. On
October 14, 2005, Washington Group International was
selected as the owners engineer. We continue to
aggressively pursue equity partners and off-takers for the
output of the unit. We are also evaluating repowering
opportunities for the Big Cajun I power stations and are working
with our cooperative customers to improve contract
administration, to expand their and our customer base on terms
advantageous to all parties and, in some cases, to modify the
terms of our contracts with respect to our current or new
customers. We continue to look for opportunities to acquire
assets that will enhance our portfolio and long-term strategic
goals.
NRGs generating assets in the South Central region consist
primarily of its net ownership of power generation facilities in
New Roads, Louisiana, which we refer to as Big Cajun II, and
also includes the Sterlington, Bayou Cove and Big Cajun peaking
facilities. NRGs power generation assets in the South
Central region as of September 30, 2005 are summarized in
the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Generating | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity | |
|
Primary | |
Plant |
|
Location | |
|
% Owned | |
|
(MW) | |
|
Fuel Type | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Big Cajun
II(1)
|
|
|
New Roads, LA |
|
|
|
86.0 |
% |
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
Coal |
|
Bayou Cove
|
|
|
Jennings, LA |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Big Cajun I (Peakers) Units 3 & 4
|
|
|
New Roads, LA |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Big Cajun I Units 1 & 2
|
|
|
New Roads, LA |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas/Oil |
|
Sterlington
|
|
|
Sterlington, LA |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total South Central
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
NRG owns 100% of Units 1 & 2; 58% of Unit 3 |
S-65
Our most significant revenue generating plant in the South
Central region is the Big Cajun II facility. Big Cajun II plant
is a coal-fired, sub-critical heat baseload plant located along
the banks of the Mississippi River, upstream from Baton Rouge.
This plant includes three coal-fired generation units (Units 1,
2 and 3) with an aggregate generation capacity of 1,730 MW as of
September 30, 2005, and generation capacity per unit of 580
MW, 575 MW and 575 MW, respectively. The plant uses coal
supplied by the Powder River Basin and was commissioned between
1981 and 1983. NRG owns 100% of Units 1 and 2 and 58% of Unit 3
for an aggregate owned capacity of 1,489 MW (86.0%) of the
plant. All three units have been upgraded with low NOx burners
and overfire air. The Unit 1 generator has recently been rewound
and was optimized with a modern turbine/exciter control system.
Units 2 and 3 are planned for generator rewinds, turbine/exciter
control replacements and additional neural net systems in future
years. These efficiency improvements are expected to cost
approximately $30 million.
Market Framework
NRGs assets in the South Central region are located within
the franchise territories of vertically integrated utilities,
primarily Entergy Corporation, or Entergy. Entergy performs the
scheduling, reserve and reliability functions that are
administered by the ISOs in certain other regions of the United
States and Canada. Although the reliability functions performed
are essentially the same, the primary differences between these
markets lie in the physical delivery and price discovery
mechanisms. In the South Central region, all power sales and
purchases are consummated bilaterally between individual
counterparties. Transacting counterparties are required to
reserve and purchase transmission services from the relevant
transmission owners at their FERC-approved tariff rates.
Included with these transmission services are the reserve and
ancillary costs.
As of September 30, 2005, NRG had long-term
all-requirements contracts with 11 Louisiana distribution
cooperatives. The agreements are standardized into three types,
Form A, B and C and have the terms, contract loads and
customers as shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term | |
|
Contract Load | |
|
Customers | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Form A
|
|
|
25 yrs. |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
6 |
|
Form B
|
|
|
25 yrs. |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1 |
|
Form C
|
|
|
9-14 yrs. |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
NRG also has long-term contracts with the Municipal Agency of
Mississippi, South Mississippi Electric Power Association, and
Southwestern Electric Power Company, which collectively comprise
an additional 13% of contract load.
At peak demand periods, NRGs Big Cajun II assets are
insufficient to serve the requirements of the customers under
these contracts, and at such times, NRG typically purchases
power from other power producers in the region, frequently at
higher prices than can be recovered under our contracts. As the
loads of our customers grow, we can expect this imbalance to
worsen, unless we are successful in renegotiating the terms of
our long-term contracts.
In August and September 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita roiled
the South Central regions power markets. Although NRG
recognized an impairment loss of approximately $1.3 million
for hurricane-damaged assets, four of the South Central
regions 11 cooperative customers suffered extensive losses
to their distribution systems, and the region suffered a drop in
contract sales during the ensuing power outages. The load loss
and the transmission constraints had offsetting impacts on the
South Central regions margins resulting in gross margins
that were $4 million below expectations. In addition, NRG
created a reserve for a receivable from Entergy New Orleans of
$1.9 million because of its hurricane-related bankruptcy.
As of September 30, 2005, NRG owned approximately 1,044 MW
of generating capacity in the Western region of the United
States (California), of which approximately 904 MW is through a
50% interest in WCP Holdings. On December 27, 2005, NRG
entered into a purchase and sale agreement to acquire
Dynegys 50%
S-66
ownership interest in West Coast Power to become the sole owner
of power plants totaling approximately 1,800 MW of
generation capacity in the Western region. The transaction,
which is subject to regulatory approval, is expected to close in
the first quarter of 2006.
Operating Strategy
Our Western region strategy is focused on maximizing the cash
flow and value associated with our generating plants while
protecting and eventually realizing the valuable real estate on
which they are located. There are four principal components to
this strategy. First, we are focused on influencing market
reforms in California to provide an energy market environment
where our capacity can be offered into centrally administered
competitive auctions, such as we see in the Northeast, and also
provide for the negotiation of bilateral transactions for both
energy and capacity. Second, we are preparing our sites for the
construction of new capacity to meet increasing local area
requirements. At El Segundo, NRG has a California Energy
Commission, or CEC, permit to construct a new combined cycle
plant to replace the retired units at the site. At the Long
Beach site, NRG has land available to construct new peaking
capacity. NRG is developing plans for site remediation and
preparation in anticipation of a new request for new capacity
from load serving entities. Third, we are taking active steps to
assess the value of our property for non-power generation
purposes. Two of West Coast Powers plants are situated at
choice locations on the Pacific coast. Fourth, we are engaged in
the identification of collaborative value enhancing projects
with communities and businesses located near our plants. West
Coast Powers plants are, for example, considered excellent
candidates for the co-location of desalination plants.
NRGs assets in the Western region include three additional
power plants, Red Bluff and Chowchilla (94 MW total),
located in northern California that have some locational value
and one plant in Henderson, Nevada (Saguaro), that is contracted
to Nevada Power and two steam hosts. NRG has entered into a
resource adequacy agreement with PG&E Corporation, or
PG&E, for the capacity of the Red Bluff and Chowchilla units
that expires December 31, 2007. The Saguaro plant in Nevada
is contracted to Nevada Power through 2022, one steam host
(Pioneer) whose contract expires in 2007 (with a negotiated
renewal) and a steam off taker (Ocean Spray), whose contract
runs through 2015. The Saguaro plant had a long-term gas supply
agreement that expired in July 2005 and the plant is now exposed
to the monthly spot gas market. At present, Saguaro cannot pass
higher natural gas costs through to its customers, and the plant
is currently experiencing negative cash flows. NRGs
strategy is to negotiate with Nevada Power and the steam host to
restructure their agreements to provide suitable economic
benefits. Alternatively, we expect that we will negotiate a sale
of our share of that plant.
Facilities
In May 1999, Dynegy and NRG formed WCP Holdings to serve as
the holding company for a portfolio of operating companies that
own generation assets in the Southern California market operated
by the California ISO, or Cal ISO. This portfolio currently
consists of the El Segundo Generating Station, the retired Long
Beach Plant Site, the Encina Generating Station and 13
combustion turbines distributed throughout the San Diego area.
WCP is directed by an executive committee comprised of two
voting members from each of NRG and Dynegy. Under the direction
of this executive committee, Dynegy provides power marketing,
fuel procurement and accounting services to WCP and NRG provides
operations and management services. On December 27, 2005,
NRG entered into a purchase and sale agreement to acquire
Dynegys 50% ownership interest in WCP Holdings to
become the sole owner of power plants totaling approximately
1,800 MW of generation capacity in the Western region. The
transaction, which is subject to regulatory approval, is
expected to close in the first quarter of 2006.
S-67
NRGs power generation assets in the Western region as of
September 30, 2005 are summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity | |
|
|
Plant |
|
Location | |
|
% Owned | |
|
(MW) | |
|
Primary Fuel Type | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
WCP(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encina
|
|
|
Carlsbad, CA |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
El Segundo
|
|
|
El Segundo, CA |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
Cabrillo II
|
|
|
San Diego, CA |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total WCP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Western Region Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saguaro
|
|
|
Henderson, NV |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
Chowchilla
|
|
|
Northern CA |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
Red Bluff
|
|
|
Northern CA |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Western Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
On December 27, 2005, NRG entered into a purchase and sale
agreement to acquire Dynegys 50% ownership interest in
WCP Holdings to become the sole owner of power plants
totaling approximately 1,800 MW of generation capacity in
the Western region. The transaction, which is subject to
regulatory approval, is expected to close in the first quarter
of 2006. |
The following are descriptions of our most significant revenue
generating plants in the Western region:
El Segundo. The El Segundo plant, of which NRG currently
owns 50%, is located in El Segundo, California and produces
aggregate generation capacity of 670 MW from two gas-fired
intermediate load units (Units 3 and 4). These units, which have
a generation capacity of 335 MW each, were installed in 1964 and
1965, respectively. The plant also contains two retired
gas-fired intermediate load units that were installed in 1955
and 1956 (Units 1 and 2). These units, retired in 2002, were
capable of producing 175 MW each. WCP is currently in the
process of developing a 630 MW combined cycle plant on the
property where the retired Units 1 and 2 reside. See
Regulatory Developments Regional
Businesses Market Developments Western Region.
Encina. The Encina Station, of which NRG currently owns
50%, is located in Carlsbad, California and has a combined
generating capacity of 965 MW from five fossil-fuel
steam-electric generating units and one combustion turbine. The
five fossil-fuel steam-electric units, which all primarily use
natural gas (and oil for emergency backup only under a gas
supply force majeure condition), provide intermediate load
services. The combustion turbine only provides peaking services
of 14 MW. Units 1, 2 and 3 each have a generation capacity of
approximately 107 MW and were installed in 1954, 1956 and 1958,
respectively. Units 4 and 5 have a generation capacity of
approximately 300 MW and 330 MW respectively, and were installed
in 1973 and 1978. The combustion turbine was installed in 1966.
Units 1, 2 and 3 are projected to be retired after 2010. Low
NOx
burner modifications and selective catalytic reduction equipment
has been installed on Units 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
NRGs assets in the Western region consist primarily of
older, higher heat rate, gas-fired plants in southern
California. These plants, while older and less efficient than
newer combined cycle plants, possess locational advantages
during peak hours when the newer, remotely located plants are
unable to get through transmission congestion in southern
California. As a result, the Cal ISO designated NRGs El
Segundo, Encina and Cabrillo II plants as RMR qualifying units
in 2005, and therefore those plants are entitled to certain
fixed-cost payments from the Cal ISO for the right to dispatch
those units during periods of locational constraints. Initially,
transmission upgrades by Southern California Edison and San
Diego Gas and Electric in 2005 caused the Cal ISO to drop the
RMR designation for both El Segundo and the Encina Unit 4 for
2006. However, Cal ISO designated Encina Unit 4 as an RMR
unit in a letter to Cabrillo Power I dated
S-68
December 22, 2005, and a filing requesting FERC approval of
the requisite changes to Cabrillo Power Is RMR
agreement for 2006 was made on December 29, 2005. This
change, if approved, will assure that Encina Units 4 and 5
will receive partial cost recovery under RMR and both units will
be available in the market for 2006. The potential improvement
in earnings for 2006 is expected to be approximately
$6 million over the projected budget, depending upon market
conditions. In addition, El Segundo Units 3 and 4 have been
contracted by a load serving entity for May 1, 2006 through
April 30, 2008 for a capacity payment and tolling the
purchasers natural gas. The Cal ISO has indicated that
load growth needs by 2007 may require the re-designation of
Encina Unit 4 in 2007.
Market Framework
The majority of NRGs assets in the Western region are
located within the control area of the Cal ISO. The Cal ISO
operates a financially settled real time balancing market. There
are currently no organized day ahead markets in the Western
region and such forward markets in California currently operate
similarly to those in the ERCOT market with all power sales and
purchases consummated bilaterally between individual
counterparties and scheduled for physical delivery with the Cal
ISO. All plants are subject to the FERC must offer
order, an order instituted during the energy crisis of 2000-2001
requiring any generator capable of operating and not subject to
a bilateral agreement to make its capacity available to
Cal ISO. The compensation paid by the Cal ISO for such
service generally covers only variable costs. Additionally,
California generators remain subject to a $250 per MWh price
cap, another legacy of the energy crisis mentioned above. In
January 2006, FERC approved an increase in the soft
cap from $250 per MWh to $400 per MWh, effective
January 1, 2006. NRG is working with various industry
groups and governmental authorities to put market reforms in
place in California that will encourage new investment and
enable generators to earn acceptable returns on new and existing
investments. See Regulatory Developments Regional
Businesses Market Developments Western Region.
Other North American Assets
As of September 30, 2005, NRG owned approximately 1,470 MW
of generating capacity in other regions of the United States.
NRGs other North American power generation assets are
summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generating | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity | |
|
Primary Fuel |
Plant |
|
Location |
|
% Owned | |
|
MW | |
|
Type |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audrain*
|
|
Vandalia, MO |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
577 |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Rockford I (Peaker)
|
|
Rockford, IL |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
310 |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Rocky Road Partnership*
|
|
East Dundee, IL |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
165 |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Rockford II (Peaker)
|
|
Rockford, IL |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
160 |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Dover
|
|
Dover, DE |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
104 |
|
|
Natural Gas/Coal |
|
Power Smith Cogeneration
|
|
Oklahoma City, OK |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Ilion Cogeneration*
|
|
New York |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
58 |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
James River
|
|
Virginia |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
55 |
|
|
Coal |
|
Cadillac*
|
|
Cadillac, MI |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
19 |
|
|
Wood |
|
Paxton Creek
|
|
Harrisburg, PA |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other North American Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Certain of the above projects are in a state of transition. The
Audrain project is under contract for sale. Closing is expected
in 2006. NRG is in advanced discussions regarding the transfer
of the Cadillac project. NRG is currently performing under an
agreement whereby the Ilion project will be disconnected and
terminated. On December 27, 2005, NRG entered into a
purchase and sale agreement with Dynegy through which NRG will
sell to Dynegy its 50% ownership interest in the jointly held
entity that owns the Rocky Road power plant. The transaction is
conditioned upon NRGs acquisition of Dynegys 50%
interest in WCP Holdings and subject to regulatory approval, and
is expected to close in the first quarter of 2006. See
Summary Recent Developments. |
S-69
Australia and All Other
Generation and Non-Generation Assets
As of September 30, 2005, NRG, through certain foreign
subsidiaries, had investments in power generation projects
located in Australia, Germany and Brazil with approximately
1,916 MW of total generating capacity. In addition, NRG owns
interests in coal mines located in Australia and Germany.
NRGs international power generation assets as of
September 30, 2005 are summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generating | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity | |
|
Primary Fuel | |
Plant |
|
Location | |
|
% Owned | |
|
MW | |
|
Type | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flinders
|
|
|
Australia |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
Coal |
|
Gladstone
|
|
|
Australia |
|
|
|
37.5 |
% |
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
Coal |
|
Schkopau
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
|
41.9 |
% |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
Coal |
|
MIBRAG(1)
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
Coal |
|
Itiquira
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
98.7 |
% |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Primarily a coal mining facility. Approximately 90% of
MIBRAGs revenues represent coal sales and 8% represent
electricity sales. MIBRAG owns 110 MW of net exportable
generation. Approximately two-thirds of that amount is sold to
third parties and one-third is used to power mining and other
MIBRAG operations. NRG equity in net exportable electricity is
55 MW. |
|
|
|
Asset Management Strategy |
Our strategy for maximizing our return on investment in our
assets concentrates on effective contract management, operating
the plant to ensure safe, efficient and sustainable operations
and management of the equity investment, including cash flow and
finances. NRG is currently considering strategic alternatives
with respect to Australia either to reposition its assets more
effectively within the National Electricity Market or to
monetize its investment. NRG will seek to determine the best
option, which may include a joint venture, equity spin-off,
asset swap for U.S. generation assets or trade sale over the
next few months.
NRG Flinders Assets. NRG Flinders is a merchant
generation business that derives revenue from bidding its
generation output into the South Australian region of the
National Electricity Market, or NEM, by trading the plant as a
portfolio, selling derivative hedges that are not plant specific
and supplying minor retail sales via contract. The bidding of
the plant as a portfolio supports strategies for maximizing
revenue of the entire portfolio both in terms of pool and
derivative revenues and the most economic fuel use. A hedge book
is maintained such that the short to medium term revenue is
secured via hedge levels up to and in the order of 75% to 80% of
the plant output. The current book is underpinned by a medium
term hedge with a major South Australian retailer.
The Gladstone Assets. The Gladstone assets are owned in
partnership with other investors and NRG does not have
unilateral control over management of the assets. Gladstone
Power Station is fully contracted via a power purchase agreement
and a capacity purchase agreement with Boyne Smelter Limited and
Enertrade through 2029. Enertrade is a state owned company that
trades the excess power in the NEM.
|
|
|
Asset Management Strategy |
Our German assets are owned in partnership with other investors
and NRG does not have direct control over operations. Our
strategy for maximization of return on investment therefore
concentrates on the following: contract management, monitoring
of our facility operators to ensure safe, profitable and
sustainable
S-70
operations; management of cash flow and finances; and growth of
our businesses through investments in projects related to our
current businesses.
|
|
|
Thermal and Chilled Water Businesses |
NRG Thermals thermal and chilled water businesses have a
steam and chilled water capacity of approximately
1,225 megawatt thermal equivalents, or MWt.
As of September 30, 2005, NRG Thermal owned heating and
cooling systems that provide steam heating to approximately 555
customers and chilled water to 95 customers in five different
cities in the United States. In addition, as of that date, NRG
Thermal owned and operated three projects that serve
industrial/government customers with high-pressure steam and hot
water, an 88 MW combustion turbine peaking generation facility
and an 16 MW coal-fired cogeneration facility in Dover, Delaware
and a 12 MW gas-fired project in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Approximately 34% of Thermals revenues are derived from
its district heating and chilled water business in Minneapolis,
Minnesota.
|
|
|
Resource Recovery Facilities |
NRGs Resource Recovery business owns and operates fuel
processing projects. The alternative fuel currently processed is
municipal solid waste, approximately 85% of which is processed
into refuse derived fuel, or RDF. NRGs Resource Recovery
business has municipal solid waste processing capacity of 3,000
tons per day. NRGs Resource Recovery business owns and
operates NRG Processing Solutions, which includes
14 composting and processing sites in Minnesota, of which
five sites are permitted to operate as municipal solid waste
transfer stations.
Competition
Wholesale power generation is a capital-intensive,
commodity-driven business with numerous industry participants.
We compete on the basis of the location of our plants and owning
multiple plants in our regions, which increases the stability
and reliability of our energy supply. Wholesale power generation
is fundamentally a local business which, at present, is highly
fragmented (relative to other commodity industries) and diverse
in terms of industry structure. As such, there is a wide
variation in terms of the capabilities, resources, nature and
identity of the companies we compete against from market to
market.
Employees
As of September 30, 2005, the combined company would have
had 3,740 employees, approximately 1,751 of whom were covered by
U.S. bargaining agreements. During 2005, neither NRG nor
Texas Genco experienced any significant labor stoppages or labor
disputes at their facilities.
Energy Regulatory Matters
As operators of power plants and participants in wholesale
energy markets, we are subject to regulation by various federal
and state government agencies. These include the FERC, the NRC,
PUCT and certain other state public utility commissions in which
our generating assets are located. In addition, we are also
subject to the market rules, procedures and protocols of the
various ISO and RTO markets in which we participate.
The plant operations of, and wholesale electric sales from,
Texas Genco are not currently subject to regulation by FERC, as
they are deemed to operate solely within the ERCOT and not in
interstate commerce. As discussed below, Texas Gencos
operations are subject to regulations by PUCT as well as to
regulation by the NRC with respect to its ownership interest in
the STP.
|
|
|
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
FERC, among other things, regulates the transmission and
wholesale sale of electricity in interstate commerce under the
authority of the Federal Power Act, or FPA. In addition, under
existing regulations, FERC determines whether a generation
facility qualifies for Exempt Wholesale Generator, or EWG, status
S-71
under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, or PUHCA
of 1935. FERC also determines whether a generation facility
meets the ownership and technical criteria of a Qualifying
Facility, or QF, under Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of
1978, or PURPA. Each of NRGs U.S. generating facilities
has either been determined by FERC to qualify as a QF, or the
subsidiary owning the facility has been determined to be an EWG.
This permits NRG to own and operate these electric generating
facilities without becoming subject to regulation as a holding
company under PUHCA of 1935, and in the case of NRGs QFs,
to make wholesale sales of electricity to electric utilities at
the utilitys avoided cost that are not subject to
regulation by FERC. FERCs regulation of NRG under each of
these statutes will be changed by the recent passage of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005, or EPAct 2005.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005. EPAct 2005 was enacted
into law on August 8, 2005. Among other things, EPAct 2005
repealed PUHCA of 1935, amended PURPA to remove statutory
restrictions on utility ownership of a QF and to remove a
utilitys obligation to buy from a QF, provided certain
market and transmission access conditions exist, and enacted the
Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, or PUHCA of 2005.
EPAct 2005s PUHCA changes take effect February 8,
2006. EPAct 2005s amendments to PURPA were effective as of
August 8, 2005. Though generally supported by the industry
and viewed as a positive development, EPAct 2005 remains subject
to FERC interpretation, and FERC has issued several rulemakings
and rules to implement EPAct, some of which are still ongoing.
NRG is currently assessing the effect of EPAct 2005 and these
rulemakings issued by FERC to implement it on the combined
companys regulatory environment and business.
Federal Power Act. The FPA gives FERC exclusive
rate-making jurisdiction over wholesale sales of electricity and
transmission of electricity in interstate commerce. Under the
FPA, FERC, with certain exceptions, regulates the owners of
facilities used for the wholesale sale of electricity or
transmission in interstate commerce as public utilities. The FPA
also gives FERC jurisdiction to review certain transactions and
numerous other activities of public utilities. With exceptions
for certain small power production facilities (non-geothermal
facilities greater than 30 MWs), QFs are currently exempt from
the FERCs FPA rate regulation to the extent that sales
made from them are made pursuant to the exemptions established
under PURPA and are not made under a market-based or cost-based
rate authorization from FERC. Currently, all of NRGs QF
power sales are made pursuant to the PURPA established exemption
or pursuant to FERC market-based rate authorization.
Public utilities under the FPA are required to obtain
FERCs acceptance, pursuant to Section 205 of the FPA,
of their rate schedules for wholesale sales of electricity. All
of NRGs non-QF generating companies, small power
production QFs greater than 30 MWs and power marketing
affiliates in the United States make sales of electricity in
interstate commerce and are public utilities for purposes of the
FPA. FERC has granted each of these companies the authority to
sell electricity at market-based rates. The FERCs orders
that grant NRGs generating and power marketing companies
market-based rate authority reserve the right to revoke or
revise that authority if FERC subsequently determines that NRG
can exercise market power in transmission or generation, create
barriers to entry or engage in abusive affiliate transactions.
In addition, our market-based sales are subject to certain
market behavior rules and, if any of our generating and power
marketing companies were deemed to have violated one of those
rules, they would be subject to potential disgorgement of
profits associated with the violation and/or suspension or
revocation of their market-based rate authority. As a condition
to the orders granting us market-based rate authority, every
three years NRG is required to file a market update to show that
it continues to meet FERCs standards with respect to
generation market power and other criteria used to evaluate
whether entities qualify for market-based rates. NRG is also
required to report to FERC any material changes in status that
would reflect a departure from the characteristics that FERC
relied upon when granting NRGs various generating and
power marketing companies market-based rates. On
October 28, 2005, NRG filed such a notice of change in
status regarding the Texas Genco acquisition. No party has filed
any comments in response to this change in status filing.
If NRGs generating and power marketing companies were to
lose their market-based rate authority, such companies would be
required to obtain FERCs acceptance of a cost-of-service
rate schedule and would become subject to the accounting,
record-keeping and reporting requirements that are imposed on
utilities with cost-based rate schedules.
S-72
In addition, Section 204 of the FPA gives FERC jurisdiction
over a public utilitys issuance of securities or
assumption of liabilities. However, FERC typically grants
blanket approval for future securities issuances or assumptions
of liabilities to entities with market-based rate authority. In
the event that one of NRGs public utility generating
companies were to lose its market-based rate authority, such
companys future securities issuances or assumptions of
liabilities could require prior approval of the FERC.
Section 203 of the FPA also requires FERCs prior
approval for the transfer of control over assets subject to
FERCs jurisdiction. EPAct 2005 amended this prior approval
authority in a number of ways. In particular, as proposed to be
implemented by FERC, certain companies proposing to acquire
foreign utilities or foreign operating companies would be
required to obtain prior FERC approval. This proposed
implementation, if unchanged, could impede NRGs future
acquisition of foreign assets. Also, depending on how the new
law is interpreted, certain mergers or acquisitions involving
holding companies owning generation assets only in Texas, which
were formally exempt from FERC review under Section 203 of
the FPA, may now be subject to such review under the EPAct 2005
amendments to the law. The provisions of EPAct 2005 relating to
prior approval of asset acquisitions under the FPA become
effective February 8, 2006.
PUHCA. As discussed above, EPAct 2005 repeals PUHCA of
1935, effective February 8, 2006, and replaces it with
PUHCA of 2005.
PUHCA of 1935, among other things, provides for extensive
regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, of
non-exempt public utility holding companies, limits their
utility operations to a single, integrated utility system and
requires divestiture of operations not functionally related to
the operation of the utility system. PUHCA of 1935 applies to
foreign utility operations unless such operations qualify as a
Foreign Utility Company, or FUCO or EWG, as defined under the
act.
PUHCA of 2005 retains certain definitions from PUHCA of 1935
(such as the definitions of EWG and FUCO) and provides FERC with
certain authority over and access to books and records of public
utility holding companies not otherwise exempt by virtue of
their ownership of EWGs, QFs or FUCOs. Because all of Texas
Gencos and NRGs generating facilities have QF status
or are owned through EWGs or FUCOs, neither company currently
qualifies as a holding company under PUHCA of 1935
or PUHCA of 2005.
Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act. PURPA was
initially passed in 1978 in large part to promote increased
energy efficiency and development of independent power
producers. PURPA created QFs to further both goals, and FERC is
primarily charged with administering PURPA as it applies to QFs.
As discussed above, under current law, some categories of QFs
may be exempt from regulation under the FPA as public utilities.
PURPA incentives also initially included a requirement that
utilities must buy and sell power to QFs.
As noted above, EPAct 2005 has amended several provisions of
PURPA. Among other things, EPAct of 2005 provides for the
termination of the obligation to purchase power from QFs at an
avoided cost rate under certain conditions. However, the
purchase obligation is only terminated if FERC first finds that
a QF has non-discriminatory access to wholesale energy markets
having certain characteristics (including nondiscriminatory
transmission and interconnection services provided by a regional
transmission entity in certain circumstances). Certain of
NRGs QFs currently interconnect into markets that may meet
the qualifications for elimination of the PURPA purchase
requirement. If the obligation of the local utility to purchase
from some or all of NRGs QFs is terminated, NRG will need
to find alternative purchasers for the output of these QFs once
their current contracts expire. Such alternative purchases will
be at prevailing market rates, which may not be as favorable as
the terms of our PURPA sales arrangements under existing
contracts. In addition, under proposed FERC rules implementing
EPAct of 2005, QFs not making sales pursuant to state-approved
avoided cost rates will become subject to FERCs ratemaking
authority under the FPA and be required to obtain market rate
authority in order to be allowed to sell power at market-based
rates.
|
|
|
Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
The NRC is authorized under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, or the AEA, among other things, to grant licenses for,
and regulate the operation of, commercial nuclear power
reactors. As a holder of an ownership interest in STP, Texas
Genco, LP is an NRC licensee and is subject to NRC regulation.
Texas
S-73
Genco, LPs NRC license gives it the right only to possess
an interest in STP but not to operate it. Operating authority
under the NRC operating license for STP is held by STPNOC. Texas
Genco, LP owns a related interest in STPNOC. NRC regulation
involves licensing, inspection, enforcement, testing, evaluation
and modification of all aspects of plant design and operation
(including the right to order a plant shutdown), technical and
financial qualifications, and decommissioning funding assurance
in light of NRC safety and environmental requirements. In
addition, NRC written approval is required prior to a licensee
transferring an interest in its license, either directly or
indirectly. As a possession-only licensee (i.e., non-operating
co-owner), the NRCs regulation of Texas Genco, LP
primarily focuses on its ability to meet its financial and
decommissioning funding assurance obligations. In connection
with the acquisition by Texas Genco of a 30.8% interest in STP
from CenterPoint Energy, the NRC required Texas Genco to enter
into a support agreement with Texas Genco, LP to provide up to
$120 million to Texas Genco, LP if necessary to support
operations at STP. Texas Genco entered into that support
agreement on April 13, 2005. The support agreement will
remain in effect after closing of the Acquisition.
Decommissioning Trusts. Upon expiration of the operating
terms of the operation licenses for the two generating units at
STP (currently scheduled for 2027 and 2028), the co-owners of
STP are required under federal law to decontaminate and
decommission STP. In May 2004, an outside consultant estimated a
44.0% share of the STP decommissioning costs to be approximately
$650 million in 2004 dollars.
Under NRC regulations, a power reactor licensee generally must
pre-fund the full amount of its estimated NRC decommissioning
obligations unless it is a rate regulated utility (or a state or
municipal entity that sets its own rates) or has the benefit of
a state-mandated non-bypassable charge available to periodically
fund the decommissioning trust such that periodic payments to
the trust, plus allowable earnings, will equal the estimated
decommissioning obligations needed by the time decommissioning
is expected to begin. Currently, Texas Genco, LPs funding
against its decommissioning obligation is contained within two
separate trusts. PUCT regulations provide for the periodic
funding of Texas Gencos decommissioning obligations
through non-bypassable charges collected by CenterPoint Energy
Houston Electric, LLC and AEP Texas Central Company, or
CenterPoint Houston and AEP TCC, from their customers.
In the event that the funds from the trusts are ultimately
determined to be inadequate to decommission the STP facilities,
the original owners of Texas Gencos STP interests,
CenterPoint Houston and AEP TCC, each will be required to
collect, through their PUCT-authorized non-bypassable charges to
customers, additional amounts required to fund the
decommissioning obligations relating to Texas Gencos 44.0%
share, provided that Texas Genco has complied with the
PUCTs rules and regulations regarding decommissioning
trusts. Following the completion of the decommissioning, if
surplus funds remain in the decommissioning trusts, any excess
will be refunded to the respective rate payers of CenterPoint
Houston or AEP TCC (or their successors).
|
|
|
Public Utility Commission of Texas |
Texas Gencos subsidiaries are registered as power
generation companies with PUCT. PUCT also has jurisdiction over
power generation companies with regard to the administration of
nuclear decommissioning trusts, PUCT state-mandated capacity
auctions and the implementation of measures to mitigate undue
market power that a power generation company may have and to
remedy market power abuses in the ERCOT market and, indirectly,
through oversight of ERCOT.
Regulatory Developments
In New England, New York, the Mid-Atlantic region, the Midwest
and California, FERC has approved independent system operators,
or regional transmission organizations, or ISOs or RTOs. Most of
these ISOs or RTOs administer a wholesale centralized bid-based
spot market in their regions pursuant to tariffs approved by
FERC and associated ISO/ RTO market rules. These tariffs/market
rules dictate how the day ahead and real-time markets operate,
how market participants may make bilateral sales to one another,
and how entities with market-based rates shall be compensated
within those markets. The ISOs or RTOs in these regions also
control access to and the operation of the transmission grid
within their regions. In Texas, pursuant to a 1999
S-74
restructuring statute, the PUCT has granted similar
responsibilities to ERCOT. Except for sales within ERCOT and by
certain of NRGs QFs under PURPA, all of NRGs sales,
whether made into an ISO- or RTO-administered market or
bilaterally negotiated, are made pursuant to market-based rate
authorizations granted by FERC to our FPA public utility
subsidiaries. Access to, pricing for and operation of the
transmission grid in regions not controlled by such ISOs or RTOs
is controlled by the local transmission owning utility according
to its Open Access Transmission Tariff approved by FERC.
Both Texas Genco and NRG are affected by rule/tariff changes
that occur in the existing ISOs and RTOs. The ISOs and RTOs that
oversee most of the wholesale power markets have in the past
imposed, and may in the future continue to impose, price
limitations and other mechanisms (in particular, market power
mitigation rules) to address some of the volatility in these
markets. These types of price limitations and other regulatory
mechanisms may adversely affect the profitability of our
generation facilities that sell energy into the wholesale power
markets. In addition, the regulatory and legislative changes
that have recently been enacted in a number of states in an
effort to promote competition are novel and untested in many
respects. These new approaches to the sale of electric power
have very short operating histories, and it is not yet clear how
they will operate in times of market stress or pressure given
the extreme volatility and lack of meaningful long-term price
history in many of these markets and the imposition of price
limitations by independent system operators.
Regional Businesses
Market Developments
At the direction of the PUCT, the ERCOT stakeholder process has
developed the Texas Nodal Protocols that sets forth
a complete and detailed revised wholesale market design based on
locational marginal pricing (in place of the current ERCOT zonal
market today). The stakeholder process took two years to
complete and incorporates a variety of unique characteristics
for a nodal market as the result of accommodations reached by
parties in the stakeholder process. Major elements include
bilateral energy and ancillary schedules, day-ahead energy
market, resource specific energy and ancillary service bid
curves, direct assignment of all congestion rents, nodal energy
prices for generators, aggregation of nodal to zonal energy
prices for loads, congestion revenue rights (including
pre-assignment for public power entities), and pricing
safeguards. The PUCT will consider approval of the Texas Nodal
Protocols by early 2006 and has indicated January 1, 2009,
as the date for full implementation of the new market design.
Under the expedited schedule, the evidentiary hearing concluded
December 13, 2005, and briefing by parties will conclude
January 27, 2006.
During 2005, NRGs Devon, Middleton and Montville stations
operated under RMR agreements with ISO-NE. With these RMR
agreements set to expire at the end of 2005, on November 1,
2005, NRG filed new RMR agreements with FERC in order provide
for the continued provision of reliability services from these
resources. Following the filing of interventions and protests
challenging the proposed rates and provisions of the filed RMR
agreements, NRG entered into a settlement agreement with the
Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, the
Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel, and
ISO-NE. This settlement
agreement was filed as an Offer of Settlement, or Settlement,
with FERC on December 20, 2005, in Docket
No. ER06-118-000.
NRG is not aware of any opposition to the Settlement and has
requested FERC approve the settlement by January 31, 2006.
Under the settlement, NRG is entitled to annual fixed revenue
requirement of $98 million, allocated among the stations,
subject to NRG meeting the availability requirements specified
therein. In addition, NRG is also entitled to retain 35% of its
market revenues from the subject stations, while crediting 65%
of such revenues against the monthly availability payments under
the RMR agreements. The settlement will allow NRG to maintain
uninterrupted RMR service from its stations, without the
regulatory litigation that
S-75
Connecticut entities are pursuing against other RMR applicants.
The settlement specifies a January 1, 2006 effective date
and the parties have requested expedited approval of the
settlement RMR agreements without modification. Pending
FERCs determination on the settlement, the ISO-NE has
agreed to implement the settlement RMR agreements effective
January 1, 2006. As part of the settlement, NRG and ISO-NE
agreed on appropriate revisions to some of the operating
characteristics, bid costs and operating characteristics, and
with those changes, all of
ISO-NEs concerns
with the November 1, 2005 filing have been resolved.
The new RMR agreements will be in effect until LICAP is fully
implemented or as FERC may otherwise determine if it approves a
transition program for LICAP. In addition, the settlement RMR
agreements contain some new termination provisions. For example,
the Devon RMR agreement will terminate ninety days after the
commencement of Locational Forward Reserve Market, but no
earlier than January 1, 2007. In certain circumstances,
after January 1, 2007, the Connecticut entities will be
allowed to seek termination by filing a Section 206
complaint at FERC.
|
|
|
LICAP Market Developments |
On August 31, 2004, ISO-NE filed its proposal for LICAP
with the FERC, which is deciding the issue in a litigated
proceeding before an administrative law judge. Under the
proposal, separate capacity markets would be created for
distinct areas of New England, including southwest Connecticut,
where several of NRGs Connecticut plants are located, and
the rest of the state of Connecticut. While NRG views this
proposal as a positive development, as it is currently proposed
it would not permit NRG to recover all of its fixed costs. In
response, NRG has submitted testimony that includes an
alternative proposal. On June 15, 2005, the FERC
administrative law judge issued her recommended decision, which
recommended FERC approve ISO-NEs proposed LICAP design
with few exceptions. On July 15, 2005, NRG and the other
parties to the case filed briefs on exceptions to the decision
with FERC. On August 10, 2005, FERC issued an order
delaying the implementation of a LICAP market from
January 1, 2006 until October 1, 2006, at the
earliest, and conducted oral argument on September 20,
2005. On October 7, 2005, participants in NEPOOL filed a
joint motion with the FERC for the expedited appointment of a
settlement judge and the commencement of settlement negotiations
regarding the establishment of a LICAP market. On
October 12, 2005, in response to a motion filed by ISO-NE
for clarification of the FERCs order of August 10,
2005 delaying implementation of the LICAP market, the FERC
delayed the implementation of a separate energy zone for
southwest Connecticut.
On September 12, 2005, Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General
for the state of Connecticut, the Connecticut Office of Consumer
Counsel, the Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative
and the Connecticut Industrial Energy Consumers filed a
complaint against ISO-NE pursuant to sections 206 and 212 of the
Federal Power Act, seeking to amend the ISO-NEs Market
Rule 1 to require all electric generation facilities not
currently operating under an RMR agreement in Connecticut to be
placed under cost-of-service rates. On October 20, 2005,
NRG, among others, filed an answer requesting that the
Commission dismiss the complaint. NRGs Jet Power and
Norwalk facilities are not currently operating under an RMR
agreement.
NRGs New York City generation is presently subject to
price mitigation in the installed capacity market. When the
capacity market is tight, the price NRG receives is capped by
the mitigation price. However when the New York City capacity
market is not tight, such as during the winter season, the
proposed demand curve price levels should increase revenues from
capacity sales over revenues obtained in previous capacity
markets. On January 7, 2005, NYISO filed proposed installed
capacity, or ICAP, demand curves for the following capacity
years: 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. Under the NYISO proposal,
the ICAP price for New York City generation would be $126 per
KW-year for the capacity year 2006-07. On April 21, 2005,
FERC accepted the NYISOs proposed demand curves, with
certain minor revisions. The existing in-city mitigation
measures, however, will continue to apply to us when the
capacity market is tight, preventing us from obtaining these
higher prices.
S-76
On October 6, 2005, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, or
NiMo, filed a complaint against NYISO and the New York State
Reliability Council, or NYSRC, requesting that the FERC direct
the NYSRC to modify its methodology for calculating the
statewide installed reserve margin. NiMos complaint also
alleges that the NYISO incorrectly calculates the installed
capacity requirement.
On January 25, 2005, FERC issued an order approving the PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C., or PJM, proposal to increase the
compensation for generators that are located in load pockets and
are mitigated at least 80% of their running time. Specifically,
when a generator would be subject to mitigation, the generator
would have the option of recovering its variable cost plus $40
or a negotiated rate with PJM based on the facilitys going
forward costs. If the generator declines both options, it could
file for an alternative rate with FERC. FERC also substantially
revised the exemption of facilities built after 1996 from the
energy price capping mitigation rule. Several of NRGs
facilities are presently mitigated 80% of the time and,
therefore, are impacted by the change and may benefit from the
increased compensation provided for such generators.
On August 31, 2005, PJM filed a proposed reliability
pricing model, or RPM, that, if accepted by FERC, would modify
the capacity obligations imposed on load, and related market
mechanisms within PJM. The primary features of the RPM proposal
are the establishment of locational capacity markets using a
downward-sloping demand curve similar to the demand curve model
adopted in New York; a four-year-forward commitment of capacity
resources; establishing separate obligations and auction
procurement mechanisms for quick start and load following
resources; allowing certain planned resources, transmission
upgrades and demand resources to compete with existing
generation resources to satisfy capacity requirements; and
market power mitigation rules (which are primarily applied to
existing generation resources, such as NRGs). On
October 19, 2005, NRG filed an intervention and protest in
response to the PJM RPM proposal. On December 8, 2005, FERC
issued a notice establishing a technical conference on the
issues raised by PJMs RPM filing. The outcome of this
proceeding is not possible to predict with certainty, nor is the
timing of any implementation of PJMs proposed RPM model.
On January 3, 2005, Entergy submitted a petition for
declaratory order requesting guidance on issues associated with
its proposal to establish an independent coordinator of
transmission, or ICT. Entergy requested FERCs guidance on
whether the functions to be performed by the ICT will cause it
to become a public utility under the Federal Power Act or the
transmission provider under Entergys Open Access
Transmission Tariff, or OATT, and whether Entergys
transmission pricing proposal satisfies FERCs transmission
pricing policy. On May 23, 2005, FERC issued an order
granting rehearing for further consideration but has not yet
acted on rehearing.
On March 22, 2005, FERC granted Entergys Petition for
declaratory order, stating that the implementation of the ICT
proposal on an experimental basis will permit a transmission
decision-making process that is independent of control by any
market participant or class of participants. On May 27,
2005, Entergy submitted a Section 205 filing detailing the
enhanced functions that the ICT will perform. Numerous
interventions and protests were filed in response, a technical
conference has been held and the proceeding is ongoing.
NRG has negotiated RMR agreements with the Cal ISO for one-year
terms for all of the WCP capacity. NRG has filed these RMR
agreements with FERC, with an effective date of January 1,
2006, for each of our Encina and Cabrillo II plants. Cal ISO did
not designate the El Segundo plant as an RMR for 2006. A tolling
agreement for the total capacity of the El Segundo plant has
been executed with a major load serving entity for the period
May 2006 through April 2008.
WCP will continue to pursue repowering opportunities at the El
Segundo, Encina and Long Beach plants where grid stability and
in-load resource
adequacy is needed. On December 23, 2004, the CEC approved
NRGs application for a permit to repower the existing El
Segundo site and replace retired units 1 and 2 with
S-77
630 MW of new combined cycle generation. On
January 19, 2005, the CEC voted unanimously to reconsider
its December 23, 2004 decision to certify the repowering
project. The reconsideration hearing took place on
February 2, 2005 and the permit was approved by unanimous
vote of the CEC. The reconsideration extended the
30-day period in which
parties may petition for rehearing or seek judicial review to
March 4, 2005. A petition seeking review of the CEC final
order was filed with the California Supreme Court on
March 14, 2005. On August 31, 2005, the California
Supreme Court refused to hear the case, making that date the
effective date of the permit. The El Segundo permit has as a
condition the payment of $5 million by the project to the
Santa Monica Bay Restoration Fund with the first
$1.0 million being due in equally quarterly installments
beginning 30 days following the disposition of all appeals.
The initial quarterly payment has been made. Should we elect to
repower the Long Beach site, we will do it outside of the CEC
permitting process. We do not believe the CEC can legally assert
jurisdiction over a Long Beach repowering project as the total
anticipated megawatts added will be less than the number of
megawatts retired. The California Court of Appeals, in a case
involving the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, held
that the CEC jurisdiction is only required where the total
megawatts added exceed the existing megawatts of capacity by
over 50 megawatts.
In California, the Cal ISO continues with its plan to move
toward markets similar to PJM, NYISO and ISO-NE with its Market
Redesign & Technology Upgrade, or MRTU formerly MD02.
These changes, once implemented, will re-establish a day-ahead
time market and allow for multiple settlements. We view this as
a vast improvement to the existing structure. In general, the
Cal ISO is continuing along a path of small incremental changes
rather than significant market restructuring. Although numerous
stakeholder meetings have been held, the final market design
remains unknown at this time. The effect of the new MRTU changes
on us cannot be determined at this time. In addition to that
activity, the California Public Utility Commission, or CPUC,
recently issued their Resource Adequacy Order, which we believe
will ultimately create greater opportunities for merchant
generators in California. However, the final order did delay the
implementation of local capacity requirements and allowed a
liberalized phase out of firm liquidated damages contracts,
which may act as a disincentive for load serving entities to
contract for our capacity over the next two years. Assembly Bill
1576 which will promote and codify the recovery of costs from
repowered facilities thus making contracting from these
sites more attractive to the in-state-utilities, was passed by
the Senate on September 8, 2005, and signed by the Governor
on September 29, 2005. This provides opportunities for the
Western region, as WCP currently holds a permit for repowering
up to 630 MW at the El Segundo facility and options for
redevelopment at the Long Beach facility. Both facilities are
positioned for possible long-term contracts as the market rules
and structure fall into place in the near future.
The CEC recently issued their 2005 Energy Report Range of
Need and Policy Recommendations To the California Public
Utilities Commission. That study confirmed that the SCE
franchise territory will require over 8,000 MW of new generation
capacity by 2009; a dire prediction for a state with limited new
resources coming on line and retirement of older facilities
accelerating. There is some indication that the various
regulatory agencies are responding to these warnings by moving
to design a market that will provide the incentives to invest in
new generation. The CPUC now requires that load-serving entities
meet a 15-17% reserve margin by June 2006. This has prompted
RFOs from load-serving entities, with the stated goal of
engaging in bilateral contract negotiations with the merchant
generators to secure their long-term capacity needs.
Load-serving entities must demonstrate, by January 27, 2006
and by September 30 for each year thereafter that they have
secured at least 90% of their capacity needs for the following
year. The CPUC order requiring a demonstration of adequate
capacity should present opportunities to enter into new
bilateral agreements pursuant to competitive RFO processes. The
Red Bluff and Chowchilla facilities have received capacity
contracts for the period April 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2007 from a major load serving entity. The
capacity for El Segundo Units 3 and 4 has been secured under a
tolling agreement with a major load serving entity for the
period May 2006 through April 2008.
In September 2004, Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed AB2006,
commonly referred to as the re-regulation
initiative. A proposition (Proposition 80) that would amend
legislation forever prohibiting customer choice in
California was defeated in a November 2005 special election.
S-78
Environmental Matters
NRG and Texas Genco are subject to a broad range of
environmental and safety laws and regulations (across a broad
number of jurisdictions) in the development, ownership,
construction and operation of domestic and international
projects. These laws and regulations generally require that
governmental permits and approvals be obtained before
construction or during operation of power plants. Environmental
laws have become increasingly stringent over time, particularly
the regulation of air emissions from power generators. Such laws
generally require regular capital expenditures for power plant
upgrades, modifications and the installation of certain
pollution control equipment. It is not possible at this time to
determine when or to what extent additional facilities, or
modifications to existing or planned NRG or Texas Genco
facilities, will be required due to potential changes to
environmental and safety laws and regulations, regulatory
interpretations or enforcement policies. In general, future laws
and regulations are expected to require the addition of
emissions control or other environmental quality equipment or
the imposition of certain restrictions on the operations of the
combined company. We expect that future liability under, or
compliance with, environmental requirements could have a
material effect on our operations or competitive position.
|
|
|
U.S. Federal Environmental Initiatives |
On May 18, 2005, the US Environmental Protection Authority,
or USEPA, published the Clean Air Mercury Rule, or CAMR, to
permanently cap and reduce mercury emissions from coal-fired
power plants. CAMR imposes limits on mercury emissions from new
and existing coal-fired plants and creates a market-based
cap-and-trade program that will reduce nationwide utility
emissions of mercury in two phases (2010 and 2018). Consistent
with the significant debate on whether the USEPA has authority
to regulate mercury emissions through a cap-and-trade mechanism
(as opposed to a command-and-control requirement to install
maximum achievable control technology, or MACT, on a
unit basis), 14 states, together with five environmental
organizations, have filed petitions for reconsideration of CAMR.
The states (including California, Connecticut, Delaware,
Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New
Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and
Wisconsin) allege that the rule violates the Clean Air Act, or
CAA, because it fails to treat mercury as a hazardous air
pollutant. On August 4, 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit denied the environmental
petitioners request for a stay of CAMR. On
October 28, 2005, the USEPA published notices of
reconsideration of seven specific aspects of CAMR (including
state allocations). Each of our coal-fired electric power plants
will be subject to mercury regulation. However, since the rule
has yet to be implemented by individual states and given the
USEPAs pending reconsideration of the rule, it is
difficult to assess with certainty how CAMR will affect our
operations. Nevertheless, we continue to actively review
emerging mercury monitoring and mitigation strategies and
technologies to identify the most cost-effective options for NRG
in implementing required mercury emission controls on the
stipulated schedule.
On May 12, 2005, the USEPA published the Clean Air
Interstate Rule, or CAIR. This rule applies to 28 Eastern States
and the District of Columbia and caps SO2 and
NOx
emissions from power plants in two phases (2010 and 2015 for SO2
and 2009 and 2015 for
NOx).
CAIR will apply to certain of the combined companys power
plants in New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Delaware,
Louisiana, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Texas. States
must achieve the required emission reductions through:
(a) requiring power plants to participate in a
USEPA-administered interstate cap-and-trade system; or
(b) measures to be selected by individual states. On
August 24, 2005, the USEPA published a proposed Federal
Implementation Plan, or FIP, to ensure that generators affected
by CAIR reduce emissions on schedule. In addition, on
December 20, 2005, the USEPA signed proposed revisions to
the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
for fine particulates (PM2.5) and inhalable coarse particulates
(PM10-PM2.5), that would require affected states to implement
further rules to address
SO2
and
NOx
emissions (as precursors of fine particulates in the
atmosphere). Further, on November 22, 2005, the USEPA
granted requests to reconsider four specific aspects of CAIR
(including the inclusion of certain states) with final action or
reconsideration expected by March 15, 2006. While our
current business plans include initiatives to address emissions
(for example, the conversion of Huntley and Dunkirk to burn low
sulfur coal), until the final CAIR rule and
S-79
NAAQS for PM2.5, PM10-2.5 and ozone are actually implemented by
specific state legislation, it is not possible to identify with
greater specificity the effect of CAIR on us. As noted below,
certain states in which we operate have already announced plans
to implement emissions reductions that go beyond the CAIR
requirements. It is possible that investments in additional
backend control technologies will be required and we continue to
evaluate these issues.
Although we recognize the uncertainties regarding how CAMR and
CAIR will be implemented, we expect to incur a substantial
increase in our environmental capital expenditures between 2009
and 2012 in order to ensure compliance with CAMR and CAIR. We
have currently estimated expenditures of around
$540 million for CAMR and CAIR compliance during this
period for the NRG facilities, most of which would be incurred
at our various coal-fired plants in the Northeast region and
South Central region. We have currently estimated our total
capital expenditures for compliance with air pollution control
regulations from 2006 to 2014 at the NRG facilities at
approximately $675 million.
Since 1999, Texas Genco has invested approximately
$700 million for NOx emissions controls at its plants.
These emissions controls were installed to comply with
regulations adopted by the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality to attain the one-hour national ambient air quality
standard for ozone, as well as provisions of the Texas electric
restructuring law. As a result, emissions from its plants in the
Houston-Galveston area have been reduced by approximately 88%
from 1998 levels and its fleet overall operates at one of the
lowest
NOx
emissions rates in the country. In aggregate, the Texas Genco
plants are in compliance with current
NOx
emission limits and are not expected to incur material
environmental capital expenditures to ensure
NOx
emissions compliance in the next several years. The Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality has, however, initiated a
rulemaking process for establishing lower
NOx
emissions limits to assure compliance with the USEPA 8-hour
ozone standard in the Houston-Galveston and
Dallas-Fort Worth areas. It is possible that any new
regulations implemented may require additional
NOx
emission controls on Texas Genco plants in 2009 or beyond. We
have currently estimated approximately $70 million in
additional capital expenditures with respect to compliance with
air pollution control requirements (primarily replacement of
catalyst for
NOx
emission controls) between 2006 and 2014.
The USEPA had also proposed MACT standards for nickel from
oil-fired units that would essentially require the installation
of electrostatic precipitators on certain oil-fired units. These
proposed requirements were originally included in drafts of
CAMR. However, reflecting further dialogue with generation
industry participants and additional scientific review, the
nickel MACT provisions were omitted from CAMR. In fact, the
USEPA issued a delisting rule on March 29, 2005 effectively
removing the MACT standards for nickel (i.e., specific control
technologies to be installed at each affected plant) at
oil-fired power plants. A number of environmental groups lodged
legal challenges to the USEPAs delisting rule and the
agency has agreed to reconsider this delisting, although it has
not specified which issues will be reconsidered. As the
delisting challenge relates to both nickel from oil-fired power
plants and mercury from coal-fired plants, it is not possible to
predict the outcome of the pending legal action.
NRGs facilities in the eastern United States are subject
to a cap-and-trade program governing
NOx
emissions during the ozone season (May 1 through
September 30). These rules essentially require that one
NOx
allowance be held for each ton of
NOx
emitted from fossil fuel-fired stationary boilers, combustion
turbines, or combined cycle systems. Each of NRGs
facilities that is subject to these rules has been allocated
NOx
emissions allowances. NRG currently estimates that the portfolio
total is currently sufficient to generally cover operations at
these facilities through 2009. However, if at any point
allowances are insufficient for the anticipated operation of
each of these facilities, NRG must purchase
NOx
allowances. Any obligation to purchase a substantial number of
additional
NOx
allowances could have a material adverse effect on NRGs
operations.
The Clean Air Visibility Rule (or so-called BART rule) was
published by the USEPA on July 6, 2005. This rule is
designed to improve air quality in national parks and wilderness
areas. The rule requires regional haze controls (by targeting
SO2
and
NOx
emissions from sources including power plants of a certain
vintage) through the installation of Best Available Retrofit
Technology, or BART, in certain cases. States must develop
implementation plans by December 2007 which may be satisfied
through an emissions trading program for BART sources. Although
the BART rule will apply to many of the Companys
facilities, sources that are also
S-80
subject to CAIR (which include most of our facilities) will
likely be able to satisfy their obligations under the BART rule
through compliance with the more stringent CAIR. Accordingly, no
material additional expenditures are anticipated for compliance
with the Clean Air Visibility Rule, beyond those required by
CAIR.
In addition to federal regulation, national legislation has been
proposed that would impose annual caps on U.S. power plant
emissions of
NOx,
SO2,
mercury, and, in some instances,
CO2.
While the Administrations proposed Clear Skies Act (which
would regulate the aforementioned pollutants except for
CO2)
stalled in Senate Committee on March 9, 2005, the Bush
Administration continues to support this legislation. Clear
Skies overlaps significantly with CAIR and CAMR, and would
likely modify or supersede those rules if enacted as federal
legislation as proposed.
Twelve states and various environmental groups filed suit
against the USEPA seeking confirmation that the USEPA has an
existing obligation to regulate greenhouse gases, or GHGs, under
the CAA. On July 15, 2005, the US Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit (in Commonwealth of
Massachusetts v. EPA) supported the USEPAs refusal to
regulate GHG emissions from motor vehicles, although avoiding
the broader issue of whether USEPA has authority, or an
obligation, to regulate GHGs under the CAA. On September 1,
2005, five states requested reconsideration of this dismissal.
While the specific issue under consideration is the USEPAs
obligation to require GHG cuts from mobile sources, any decision
implying that the USEPA has an obligation to regulate GHGs
nationally has wider implications for the power generation
sector. In 2004, eight states and the City of New York filed
suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New
York against American Electric Power Company, Southern Company,
Tennessee Valley Authority, Xcel Energy, Inc. and Cinergy
Corporation, alleged to be the nations five largest
emitters of GHGs and all of which are owners of electric
generation (Connecticut v. AEP). An injunction was sought
against each defendant to force it to abate its contribution to
the global warming nuisance by requiring
CO2
emissions caps and annual reductions in those caps for at least
a decade. On September 15, 2005, the public nuisance case
was dismissed on the basis that the claims made raised
political questions reserved to the legislative and
executive branches of the federal government. On
September 20, 2005, plaintiffs filed an appeal of this
decision with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit. The initiation of GHG-related litigation and proposed
legislation is becoming more frequent, although the outcomes of
such suits or proposed litigation cannot be predicted. Although
NRG has not been named as a defendant in any related suits, the
outcome of such suits could affect the overall regulation of
GHGs under the CAA. Our compliance costs with any mandated GHG
reductions in the future could be material. See also
Regional U.S. Environmental Regulatory
Initiatives, below.
In the 1990s, the USEPA commenced an industry-wide investigation
of coal-fired electric generators to determine compliance with
environmental requirements under the CAA associated with
repairs, maintenance, modifications and operational changes made
to facilities over the years. As a result, the USEPA and several
states filed suits against a number of coal-fired power plants
in mid-western and southern states alleging violations of the
CAA NSR/ Prevention of Significant Deterioration, or PSD,
requirements. In one of the more prominent suits of this type,
involving Ohio Edison, a subsidiary of First Energy, the USEPA
reached settlement on March 18, 2005 for NSR issues with
respect to all coal-fired plant located in Ohio, obligating
First Energy to spend $1.1 billion to install pollution
control equipment through 2010. In another similar suit, on
June 15, 2005 the USEPA appeal in the Duke Energy case was
heard with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
holding in favor of Dukes position as to what type of
modification triggers NSR and PSD provisions. Rehearing
petitions filed in this matter by the Department of Justice and
some environmental groups were denied on August 30, 2005.
On December 28, 2005, further petitions were filed by
environmental groups requesting Supreme Court review of this
decision. On June 3, 2005, the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Alabama reached conclusions favorable to
Alabama Power through the courts interpretation of NSR
rules relating to routine maintenance, repair and
replacement, or RMRR, and the correct test for determining
a significant net emissions increase. However, divergent rulings
exist on NSR issues across the country, with courts in Ohio and
Indiana providing interpretations of the NSR provisions
different from those in the Duke and Alabama cases. For example,
on August 29, 2005, U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Indiana ruled in U.S. v. Cinergy in favor of
the USEPA and specifically rejected the conclusion in the Duke
case.
S-81
In an effort to revise the legal requirements as to what amounts
to a major modification and what emissions tests apply, USEPA
issued its NSR Reform Rule on December 31, 2002, although
its implementation was stayed by court order on
December 24, 2003. There have been a number of legal
challenges to different aspects of the proposed rule. On
October 13, 2005 USEPA proposed changes to its NSR
permitting program to stipulate an emissions test standard based
on hourly emission rates, rather than aggregate annual
emissions. The proposed change is subject to a 60-day public
comment through February 17, 2006.
Given the divergent cases and rules in this area (at both the
federal and state levels), it is difficult to predict with
certainty the parameters of the final NSR/ PSD regime. However,
in October 2005, the USEPA announced that due to the
promulgation of programs such as CAIR and the Clean Air
Visibility Rule, it is placing a lower priority on continued
enforcement of suspected NSR/ PSD violations. In the meantime,
we continue to analyze all proposed projects at our facilities
to ensure ongoing compliance with the applicable legal
requirements.
In July 2004, USEPA published rules governing cooling water
intake structures at existing power facilities (the
Phase II 316(b) Rules). The Phase II 316(b) Rules
specify certain location, design, construction and capacity
standards for cooling water intake structures at existing power
plants using the largest amounts of cooling water. These rules
will require implementation of the Best Technology Available, or
BTA, for minimizing adverse environmental impacts unless a
facility shows that such standards would result in very high
costs or little environmental benefit. The
Phase II 316(b) Rules require our facilities that
withdraw water in amounts greater than 50 million gallons
per day (and utilize at least 25% for cooling purposes) to
submit certain surveys, plans and operational and restoration
measures (with wastewater permit applications or renewal
applications) that would minimize certain adverse environmental
impacts of impingement or entrainment. The
Phase II 316(b) Rules affect a number of NRGs
and Texas Gencos plants, specifically those with
once-through cooling systems. Compliance options include the
addition of control technology, modified operations, restoration
or a combination of these, and are subject to a comparative cost
and cost/benefit justification. While NRG and Texas Genco have
conducted a number of the requisite studies, until all the
needed studies throughout our fleet have been completed and
consultations on the results have occurred with USEPA (or its
delegated state or regional agencies), it is not possible to
estimate with certainty the capital costs that will be required
for compliance with the Phase II 316(b) Rules,
although current estimates for the combined companys
facilities involve capital expenditures and related costs of
around $80 million between 2006 and 2012. In addition, the
Phase II Rules have been challenged by industrial and
environmental groups and the outcome of this litigation could
affect our obligations pursuant to these rules. Further,
Phase III rules, which were proposed in November 2004, may
be applicable to some of our smaller power plants when finalized.
Under the U.S. Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the federal
government must remove and ultimately dispose of spent nuclear
fuel and high-level radioactive waste from nuclear plants such
as STP. Consistent with the Act, owners of nuclear plants,
including Texas Genco and the other owners of STP, entered into
contracts setting out the obligations of the owners and the U.S.
Department of Energy, or DOE, including the fees being paid by
the owners for DOEs services. Since 1998, the DOE has been
in default on its obligations to begin removing spent nuclear
fuel and high-level radioactive waste from reactors. On
January 28, 2004, Texas Genco LP and the other owners of
STP filed a breach of contract suit against the DOE in order to
protect against the running of a statute of limitations.
Under the federal Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of
1980, as amended, the state of Texas is required to provide,
either on its own or jointly with other states in a compact, for
the disposal of all low-level radioactive waste generated within
the state. The state of Texas has agreed to a compact with the
states of Maine and Vermont for a disposal facility that would
be located in Texas. That compact was ratified by Congress and
signed by President Clinton in 1998. In 2003, the state of Texas
enacted legislation allowing a private entity to be licensed to
accept low-level radioactive waste for disposal. We intend to
continue to ship
S-82
low-level waste material from STP off-site for as long as an
alternative disposal site is available. Should existing off-site
disposal become unavailable, the low-level waste material will
then be stored on-site. STPs on-site storage capacity is
expected to be adequate for STPs needs until other
off-site facilities become available.
|
|
|
Regional U.S. Environmental Regulatory Initiatives |
Texas (ERCOT) Region. The USEPAs Region VI
(which includes Texas, Louisiana, and three other states)
indicated in September 2004 that it intends to evaluate 75%-80%
of the coal-fired power plants in its region over the next
several years for potential violations of the NSR program or
PSD. During air emissions inspections of Texas Gencos
Limestone plant in November 2004, a USEPA inspector informally
advised Texas Genco that the USEPA has drafted, but not yet
sent, an information request letter pursuant to Section 114
of the CAA concerning potential NSR or PSD issues at the
Limestone plant. As of January 3, 2006, Texas Genco has not
received this letter and has not had any further communications
on this issue with the USEPA.
Northeast Region. Massachusetts air regulations prescribe
schedules under which six existing coal-fired power plants
in-state are required to meet stringent emission limits for
NOx,
SO2,
mercury, and
CO2.
The state has reserved the issue of control of carbon monoxide
and particulate matter emissions for future consideration.
NRGs Somerset plant is subject to these regulations. NRG
has installed natural gas reburn technology to meet the
NOx
and
SO2
limits. On June 4, 2004, the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection, or MADEP, issued its regulation on the
control of mercury emissions. The effect of this regulation is
that starting October 1, 2006, Somerset will be capped at
13.1 lbs/year of mercury and as of January 1, 2008,
Somerset must achieve a reduction in its mercury inlet-to-outlet
concentration of 85%. We plan to meet the requirements through
the management of our fuels and the use of early and off-site
reduction credits. Additionally, NRG has entered into an
agreement with MADEP to retire or repower the Somerset station
by the end of 2009.
The Massachusetts carbon regulation 310 CMR 7.29 Emissions
Standards for Power Plants requires coal-fired generation
located within the state to comply with
CO2
emission restrictions. A carbon emissions cap applies beginning
January 1, 2006, while a rate requirement will apply in
2008. This regulation means that if
CO2
emissions at NRGs Somerset facility exceed the annual cap
from 2006, then the excess must be offset with approved
CO2
credits. However, since there are currently no approved
CO2
credits for use in Massachusetts and no general implementing
regime, MADEP has proposed that generators annually report
overages, starting in 2006, and at the time that there is a an
established
CO2
market operating in the state, NRG would be required to purchase
or generate sufficient
CO2
credits to offset the balance. On December 20, 2005,
Massachusetts issued proposed revisions to the
CO2
regulations, including a proposed implementing regime which
could allow the use of on-site and off-site generated
CO2
credits, with a price backstop of $10/ton. Comments are due by
the end of January 2006 and MADEP expects to finalize these
revisions in spring 2006. Massachusetts was involved in the
initial negotiations regarding the Regional Greenhouse Gas
Initiative, or RGGI, which is discussed below, but did not enter
into the recent Memorandum of Understanding with other
northeastern states. Given the regulatory uncertainty
surrounding implementation of Massachusettss carbon market
and the corresponding costs of
CO2
allowances when that market exists, Somerset could be materially
affected if it does not retire by the end of 2009.
Pursuant to New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation, or NYSDEC, rules (the Acid Deposition Reduction
Program, ADRP) fossil-fuel-fired combustion units in New York
must reduce SO2 emissions to 25% below the levels allowed in the
federal Acid Rain Program starting January 2005 and to 50% below
those levels starting in January 2008. In addition, under ADRP
generators now also have to meet the ozone season
NOx
emissions limit year-round. Our strategy for complying with the
ADRP is to generate early reductions of
SO2
and
NOx
emissions associated with fuel switching and use such reductions
to extend the timeframe for implementing technological controls,
which could ultimately include the addition of flue gas
desulfurization, or FGD, and selective catalytic reduction, or
SCR, equipment. On January 11, 2005, NRG reached an
agreement with the State of New York and the NYSDEC in
connection with voluntary emissions reductions at the Huntley
and Dunkirk facilities, as discussed below in Legal Proceedings.
The Consent
S-83
Decree was entered by the U.S. District Court for the Western
District of New York on June 3, 2005. NRG does not
anticipate that any additional material capital expenditures,
beyond those already spent, will be required for our Huntley and
Dunkirk plants to meet the current compliance standards under
the Consent Decree through 2010, although, this does not reflect
any additional capital expenditures that may be required to
satisfy other federal and state laws.
Huntley Power LLC, Dunkirk Power LLC and Oswego Power LLC
entered into a Consent Order with NYSDEC, effective
March 31, 2004, regarding certain alleged opacity
exceedances. The Consent Order required the respondents to pay a
civil penalty of $1.0 million which was paid in April 2004.
The Order also stipulates penalties (payable quarterly) for
future violations of opacity requirements and a compliance
schedule. NRG recently resolved a dispute with NYSDEC over the
method of calculation for stipulated penalties. NRG paid NYSDEC
$1.3 million at the end of 2005 to cover the stipulated
penalty payments that had been withheld pending resolution of
the dispute.
While no rules affecting NRGs existing facilities have
been formally proposed, Delaware has recently issued a
Start Action Notice to impose emissions standards
for
SO2,
NOx
and mercury. Delaware is pursuing such rule-making based on
recent determinations that portions of the state are in
non-attainment for NAAQS for fine particulates, and all of the
state is in non-attainment for the NAAQS for
8-Hour Ozone. We are
evaluating emissions reduction opportunities which may include
blending low sulfur western coals. NRG will actively participate
in the Delaware rule-making as a stakeholder and will continue
to be involved in environmental policy-making efforts in
Delaware through the Governors Energy Task Force and
interactions with legislators, the PSC and the Delaware
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, or
DNREC.
The Ozone Transport Commission, or OTC, was established by
Congress and governs ozone and the
NOx
budget program in certain eastern states, including
Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York and Delaware. In January
2005, the OTC redoubled its efforts to develop a multi-pollutant
regime
(SO2,
NOx,
mercury and
CO2)
that is expected to be completed by mid-2006 (with individual
state implementation to follow). On June 8, 2005, the OTC
members unanimously resolved to implement CAIR-Plus
emissions regulations, based on concerns that the USEPAs
CAIR fails to achieve attainment of 8-hour ozone and fine
particulate matter. As a result, the OTC proposes to implement a
regional plan containing emissions reduction targets for power
plants that exceed those under CAIR. The OTC targets and
timelines are as follows: (a) through September 2006: write
model rule, with participating states signing a Memorandum of
Understanding; (b) by December 2006 states file their
implementation plans or reduction regulations; (c) 2008
Phase I reductions of
NOx
(to 1.87 million tons) and
SO2
(to 3.0 million tons) apply; (d) 2012 Phase II
reductions of
NOx
(to 1.28 million tons) and
SO2
(to 2.0 million tons) apply; and (e) 2015 90% mercury
removal required. OTCs proposed CAIR-Plus involves
emissions reductions which are both sooner and more aggressive
than CAIR (e.g., aggregate
NOx
reductions would be 25% greater than CAIR, while
SO2
reductions would be 33% greater than CAIR). NRG continues to be
engaged in the OTC stakeholder process. While it is not possible
to predict the outcome of this regional legislative effort, to
the extent that the OTC is successful in implementing emissions
requirements that are more stringent than existing regimes
(including the recently reached New York settlement), NRG could
be materially impacted.
On December 20, 2005, seven northeastern states entered
into a Memorandum of Understanding to create a regional
initiative to establish a cap-and-trade GHG program for electric
generators, referred to as the Regional Greenhouse Gas
Initiative, or RGGI. The model RGGI rule is scheduled to be
announced within the next few months, with an estimate of two to
three years for participating states to finalize implementing
regulations. The current proposal is for the program to start in
2009, with a review in 2015 and an assessment of further
reductions after 2020. The proposal involves an overall RGGI cap
(with state sub-caps) based on
CO2
emissions for the period 2000 to 2004. That cap, referred to as
stabilization, will remain the same through 2015,
with a 10% reduction between 2015 and 2020. Decisions on
allowance allocations will be made by each state, although at
least 25% of the state allocations will be set aside for public
purposes, suggesting that from implementation, generators in the
RGGI region may receive an allocation of allowances that is
materially less than required to cover existing emissions,
potentially having a significant effect on the cost of
operations. While the details of the model rule are still under
development, when RGGI is implemented, our
S-84
plants in New York, Delaware and Connecticut may be materially
affected. If Massachusetts, which was originally involved in the
development of RGGI, decides to participate, NRGs plant in
that state may also be affected.
South Central Region. The Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality, or LADEQ, has promulgated State
Implementation Plan revisions to bring the Baton Rouge ozone
non-attainment area into compliance with applicable NAAQS. NRG
participated in development of the revisions, which require the
reduction of
NOx
emissions at the gas-fired Big Cajun I Power Station and
coal-fired Big Cajun II Power Station to 0.1 lbs/ MMBtu and
0.21 lbs/ MMBtu
NOx,
respectively (both based on heat input). This revision of the
Louisiana air rules would constitute a change-in-law covered by
agreement between Louisiana Generating, LLC and the electric
cooperatives (power offtakers), allowing the costs of added
combustion controls to be passed through to the cooperatives.
The combustion controls required at the Big Cajun II
Generating Station to meet the states
NOx
regulations have been installed.
On January 27, 2004, Louisiana Generating, LLC and Big
Cajun II received a request for information under
Section 114 of the CAA from USEPA seeking information
primarily related to physical changes made at Big Cajun II
and subsequently received a notice of violation, or NOV, based
on alleged NSR violations. See Legal
Proceedings for a discussion of this matter. NRG is
up-to-date with all USEPA information requests it has received
in connection with this matter and has not been contacted by
USEPA pursuant to the NOV since May 2005.
Western Region. The El Segundo Generating Station is
regulated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, or
SCAQMD. Before its retirement as of January 1, 2005, the
Long Beach Generating Station was also regulated by SCAQMD.
SCAQMD approved amendments to its Regional Clean Air Incentives
Market, or RECLAIM,
NOx
regulations on January 7, 2005. RECLAIM is a regional
emission-trading program targeting
NOx
reductions to achieve state and federal ambient air quality
standards for ozone. Among other changes, the amendments reduce
the
NOx
RECLAIM Trading Credit, or RTC, holdings of El Segundo
Power, LLC and Long Beach Generation LLC facilities by certain
amounts. Notwithstanding these amendments, retained RTCs are
expected to be sufficient to operate El Segundo Units 3 and 4 as
high as 100% capacity factor for the life of those units.
On October 6, 2005, the California Public Utilities
Commission, or CPUC, adopted a policy statement on GHG
Performance Standards as part of a focus on emissions from
conventional fossil-fuel resources. The adopted policy statement
directs the CPUC to investigate a GHG emissions performance
standard for energy procurement by the states
Investor-Owned Utilities, or IOUs, that is no higher than the
GHG emissions levels of a combined-cycle natural gas turbine for
all energy procurement contracts longer than three years in
length and for all new IOU owned generation. While this policy
statement does not impose new requirements at this time, instead
requiring CPUC staff to investigate possible new requirements
that would apply to all IOU procured energy and capacity,
including in and out-of-state generation, it gives some basis
for expecting the development of carbon constrained standards
within the California wholesale power market.
|
|
|
Domestic Site Remediation Matters |
Under certain federal, state and local environmental laws and
regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of any
facility, including an electric generating facility, may be
required to investigate and remediate releases or threatened
releases of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products
at the facility. We may also be held liable to a governmental
entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury
and investigation and remediation costs incurred by a party in
connection with hazardous material releases or threatened
releases. These laws, including the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, or CERCLA, as
amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986, or SARA, impose liability without regard to whether the
owner knew of or caused the presence of the hazardous
substances, and courts have interpreted liability under such
laws to be strict (without fault) and joint and several. The
cost of investigation, remediation or removal of any hazardous
or toxic substances or petroleum products could be substantial.
Cleanup obligations can often be triggered during the closure or
decommissioning of a facility, in addition to spills or other
occurrences during our operations. Although both
S-85
NRG and Texas Genco have been involved in on-site contamination
matters, to date, neither has been named as a potentially
responsible party with respect to any off-site waste disposal
matter.
Texas (ERCOT) Region. The lignite used to fuel the
Limstone facility is obtained from a surface mine adjacent to
the facility under an amended long-term contract with Texas
Westmoreland Coal Co., or TWCC, entered into in August 1999.
TWCC is responsible for performing ongoing reclamation
activities at the mine until all lignite reserves have been
produced. When production is completed at the mine, Texas Genco
is responsible for final mine reclamation obligations. The
Railroad Commission of Texas has imposed a bond obligation of
approximately $70 million on TWCC for the reclamation of
this lignite mine. Final reclamation activity is expected to
commence in 2015. Pursuant to the contract with TWCC, an
affiliate of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. has guaranteed
$50 million of this obligation until 2010. The remaining
sum of approximately $20 million has been bonded by the
mine operator, TWCC. Under the terms of Texas Gencos
agreement, Texas Genco is required to post a corporate guarantee
in the amount of $50 million of TWCCs reclamation
bond when CenterPoints obligation lapses. As of
December 31, 2005, Texas Genco has accrued $10 million
related to the mine reclamation obligation.
Northeast Region. Significant amounts of ash are
contained in landfills at on and off-site locations. At Dunkirk,
Huntley, Somerset and Indian River, ash is disposed of at
landfills owned and operated by NRG. NRG maintains financial
assurance to cover costs associated with landfill closure,
post-closure care and monitoring activities. NRG has funded a
trust in the amount of approximately $6.0 million to
provide such financial assurance in New York and
$6.9 million in Delaware. NRG must also maintain financial
assurance for closing interim status RCRA (Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act) facilities at the Devon,
Middletown, Montville and Norwalk Harbor Generating Stations and
has funded a trust in the amount of $1.5 million
accordingly.
NRG inherited historical clean-up liabilities when it acquired
the Somerset, Devon, Middletown, Montville, Norwalk Harbor,
Arthur Kill and Astoria Generating Stations. During installation
of a sound wall at Somerset Station in 2003, oil contaminated
soil was encountered. NRG has delineated the general extent of
contamination, determined it to be minimal, and has placed an
activity use limitation on that section of the property. Site
contamination liabilities arising under the Connecticut Transfer
Act at the Devon, Middletown, Montville and Norwalk Harbor
Stations have been identified. NRG has proposed a remedial
action plan to be implemented over the next two to eight years
(depending on the station) to address historical ash
contamination at the facilities. The total estimated cost is not
expected to exceed $1.5 million. Remedial obligations at
the Arthur Kill generating station have been established in
discussions between NRG and the NYSDEC and are estimated to be
approximately $1.1 million. Remedial investigations
continue at the Astoria generating station with long-term
clean-up liability expected to be approximately
$2.9 million. While installing groundwater-monitoring wells
at Astoria to track our remediation of an historical fuel oil
spill, the drilling contractor encountered deposits of coal tar
in two borings. NRG reported the coal tar discovery to the
NYSDEC in 2003 and delineated the extent of this contamination.
NRG may also be required to remediate the coal tar contamination
and/or record a deed restriction on the property if significant
contamination is to remain in place.
In September 2001, we experienced an underground fuel line leak
at our Vienna Generating Station, resulting in a small release
of oil free product, which was contained. NRG promptly reported
the event to the relevant state agencies and continues to work
with the Maryland Department of the Environment, or DEP, to
develop any remediation requirements. Ongoing monitoring has
indicated that the product is stable. NRG submitted a site
assessment report and proposed remediation plan to Maryland DEP
but the agency has not formally responded to those documents.
Based upon work completed by a remediation contractor retained
by NRG, long-term clean up liability in connection with this
matter is not expected to exceed $0.5 million.
South Central Region. Liabilities associated with
closure, post-closure care and monitoring of the ash ponds owned
and operated on site at the Big Cajun II Generating Station are
addressed through the use of a trust fund maintained by NRG in
the amount of approximately $5.0 million. Annual payments
are made to the fund in the amount of $0.12 million.
S-86
Western Region. The Asset Purchase Agreements for the
Long Beach, El Segundo, Encina, and San Diego gas turbine
generating facilities provide that SCE and San Diego Gas &
Electric, or SDG&E, as sellers retain liability, and
indemnify NRG, for existing soil and groundwater contamination
that exceeds remedial thresholds in place at the time of
closing. NRG and its business partner identified existing
contamination and provided the results to the sellers. SCE and
SDG&E agreed to address this identified contamination and
are undertaking corrective action at the Encina and San Diego
gas turbine generating sites. NRG could incur related costs if
SCE and SDG&E did not complete their corrective action
responsibilities. Spills and releases of various substances have
occurred at these sites since NRG established the historical
baseline, all of which have been, or will be, completely
remediated. An oil leak in 2002 from underground piping at the
El Segundo Generating Station contaminated soils adjacent to and
underneath the Unit 1 and 2 powerhouse. NRG excavated and
disposed of contaminated soils to the greatest extent permitted
by existing laws. Following NRGs formal request, the Los
Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board agreed to allow the
remaining contaminated soils to stay underneath the building
foundation until the building is demolished.
A diesel fuel spill to on-site surface containment occurred at
the Cabrillo Power II LLC Kearny Combustion Turbine facility
(San Diego) in February 2003. Emergency response and subsequent
remediation activities were completed. Confirmation sampling for
the site was completed in 2004 and submitted to the San Diego
County Department of Environmental Health. Three San Diego
Combustion Turbine facilities, formerly operating pursuant to
land leases with the U.S. Navy, are currently being
decommissioned with equipment being removed from the sites and
remediation activities occurring where necessary. All remedial
activities are being completed pursuant to the requirements of
the U.S. Navy and the San Diego County Department of
Environmental Health. Remediation activities were completed in
2004 at the Naval Training Center and North Island facilities.
At the 32nd Street Naval Station facility, additional
contamination delineation is necessary and additional
unquantified remediation in inaccessible areas may be required
in the future. Given the current uncertainties at this facility,
it is difficult to accurately estimate the resultant clean up
liability.
|
|
|
International Environmental Matters |
Most of the foreign countries in which NRG owns or may acquire
or develop independent power projects have environmental and
safety laws or regulations relating to the ownership or
operation of electric power generation facilities. These laws
and regulations, like those in the U.S., are constantly evolving
and have a significant impact on international wholesale power
producers. In particular, NRGs international power
generation facilities will likely be affected by emissions
limitations and operational requirements imposed by the Kyoto
Protocol, which is an international treaty related to greenhouse
gas emissions which entered into force on February 16,
2005, and country-based restrictions pertaining to global
climate change concerns.
We retain appropriate advisors in foreign countries and seek to
design our international asset management strategy to comply
with each countrys environmental and safety laws and
regulations. There can be no assurance that changes in such laws
or regulations will not adversely effect our international
operations.
Australia. With respect to Australia, climate change is
considered a long-term issue (e.g. 2010 and beyond) and the
Australian governments response to date has included a
number of initiatives, all of which have had no or minimal
impact on our operations. The Australian government has stated
that Australia will achieve its Kyoto Protocol target of 8%
below 1990 greenhouse gas emission levels for the 2008 to 2012
reporting period, but that Australia will not ratify the Kyoto
Protocol. Each Australian state government is considering
implementing a number of climate change initiatives that will
vary considerably state to state, with the possible exception of
an interjurisdictional state-led carbon trading proposal (which
is not supported by the federal government).
NRG Flinders disposes of ash to slurry ponds at Port Augusta in
South Australia. At the end of life of the power station, NRG
Flinders will have an obligation to remediate these ponds in
accordance with a plan accepted by the South Australian
Environment Protection Agency and confirmed in the Environment
Compliance Agreement between the South Australian Minister for
Environment and Heritage and NRG Flinders dated
September 20, 2000, or the EC Agreement. The estimated cost
of remediation including
S-87
contingencies according to the plan is AUD 2.0 million.
There is no timeline associated with the obligation, but the EC
Agreement extends to 2025. Under these arrangements, required
remediation relates to surface remediation and does not entail
any groundwater remediation.
MIBRAG / Schkopau, Germany. While
CO2
emissions trading began in Germany in 2005, pursuant to European
Union obligations under the Kyoto Protocol, we do not currently
expect the
CO2
trading program to be a material constraint on our business in
Germany. Changes to the German Emission Control Directive will
result in lower
NOx
emission limits for plants firing conventional fuels
(Section 13 of the Directive) and co-firing waste products
(Section 17 of the Directive). The new regulations will
require the Mumsdorf and Deuben Power stations to install
additional controls to reduce
NOx
emissions in 2006. These plant modifications are proceeding on
schedule.
The European Unions Groundwater Directive and Mine
Wastewater Management Directive are in the rule-making stage
with the final outcome still under debate. Given the uncertainty
regarding the possible outcome of the debate on these
directives, we cannot quantify at this time the effect such
requirements would have on our future coal mining operations in
Germany.
A new law specifically dealing with the relocation of the
residents of Heuersdorf from the path of the mining plan was
enacted by the legislature of Saxony in 2004. On
November 25, 2005, the Saxony Constitutional Court upheld
the constitutionality of the Heuersdorf act. This ruling cannot
be appealed. Nuisance suits remain a possibility, but the
courts ruling brings the matter closer to final resolution.
The supply contracts under which MIBRAG mines lignite from the
Profen mine expire on December 31, 2021. The contracts
under which MIBRAG mines lignite from the Schleenhain mine
expire in 2041. At the end of each mines productive
lifetime, MIBRAG will be required to reclaim certain areas.
MIBRAG accrues for these eventual expenses and estimates the
cost of the final reclamation to approach approximately
176 million
in the instance of the Schleenhain mine and
132 million
for Profen.
Insurance
Both NRG and Texas Genco carry insurance coverage consistent
with companies engaged in similar commercial operations with
similar properties, including business interruption insurance
for the coal and lignite plants. However, both NRGs and
Texas Gencos insurance policies are subject to certain
limits and deductibles as well as policy exclusions. Adequate
insurance coverage in the future may be more expensive or may
not be available on commercially reasonable terms. Also, the
insurance proceeds received for any loss of or any damage to any
of our generation plants may not be sufficient to restore the
loss or damage without negative impact on our financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
We expect to receive a report from Moore-McNeil LLC, an
internationally recognized independent insurance consulting
firm, which concludes that the insurance program that is
presently in effect for NRG and Texas Genco is consistent with
prudent industry practice.
Texas Genco and the other owners of STP maintain nuclear
property and nuclear liability insurance coverage as required by
law and periodically review available limits and coverage for
additional protection. The owners of STP currently maintain
$2.75 billion in property damage insurance coverage, which
is above the legally required minimum. STPNOC currently carries
accidental outage coverage with a 17 week deductible and a
six week indemnity at a rate of $3,500,000 per week. This
coverage may not be available on commercially renewable terms or
may be more expensive in the future and any proceeds from such
insurance may not be sufficient to indemnify the owners of STP
for their losses. By the date of closing of the Acquisition,
Texas Genco would have also purchased additional accidental
outage coverage for its ownership percentage in STP. This
coverage will provide maximum weekly indemnity of $1,980,000 for
52 weeks and $1,584,000 per week for the next
104 weeks after the 17-week waiting period and six-week
indemnity period have been met.
S-88
These figures are per unit and if more than one unit experiences
an outage from the same accident, the weekly indemnity is
limited to 80% of the single unit recovery when both units are
out of service.
The Price-Anderson Act, as amended by the Energy Policy Act of
2005, requires owners of nuclear power plants in the U.S. to be
collectively responsible for retrospective secondary insurance
premiums for liability to the public arising from nuclear
incidents resulting in claims in excess of the required primary
insurance coverage amount of $300 million per reactor. For
such claims in excess of $300 million per reactor, Texas
Genco and the other owners of STP are liable for any single
incident, whether it occurs at STP or at another nuclear power
plant not owned by it, up to a cap of $95.8 million per
reactor in retrospective premiums for such incident but not to
exceed $15 million per year in each case as adjusted for
future inflation. These amounts are assessed per each licensed
reactor. STP is a two reactor facility and our liability is
capped at 44.0% of these amounts due to our 44.0% interest in
STP. The Price-Anderson Act only covers nuclear liability
associated with any accident in the course of operation of the
nuclear reactor, transportation of nuclear fuel to the reactor
site, in the storage of nuclear fuel and waste at the reactor
site and the transportation of the spent nuclear fuel and
nuclear waste from the nuclear reactor. All other non-nuclear
liabilities are not covered. Any substantial retrospective
premiums imposed under the Price-Anderson Act or losses not
covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Legal Proceedings
We are, from time to time, a party to litigation or legal
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business, most
of which involves contract disputes or claims for personal
injury, including exposure to asbestos and property damage
incurred in connection with our operations. We believe that we
have valid defenses to the legal proceedings and investigations
described below and we intend to defend them vigorously.
However, litigation is inherently subject to many uncertainties.
There can be no assurance that additional litigation will not be
filed against us or our subsidiaries in the future, asserting
similar or different legal theories and seeking similar or
different types of damages and relief. Unless specified below,
we are unable to predict the outcome of these legal proceedings.
An unfavorable outcome in one or more of these proceedings could
have a material impact on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows. We also have indemnity
rights for some of these proceedings to reimburse us for certain
legal expenses and to offset certain amounts deemed to be owed
in the event of an unfavorable litigation outcome.
|
|
|
Texas Commercial Energy Litigation |
In July 2003, Texas Commercial Energy filed in federal court in
Corpus Christi, Texas a lawsuit against, as the lawsuit was
subsequently amended, Texas Genco, LP, CenterPoint Energy, Inc.,
Reliant Energy, Inc., Reliant Electric Solutions, LLC, several
other CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and Reliant Energy, Inc.
subsidiaries and a number of other participants in the ERCOT
market. The plaintiff, a retail electricity provider in the
Texas market served by ERCOT, alleged that the defendants
conspired to illegally fix and artificially increase the price
of electricity in violation of state and federal antitrust laws
and committed fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The lawsuit
sought damages in excess of $500 million, exemplary
damages, treble damages, interest, costs of suit and
attorneys fees. In June 2004, the federal court dismissed
plaintiffs claims on jurisdictional grounds and, in July
2004, the plaintiff filed an appeal that Texas Genco, LP
contested. The court of appeals affirmed the lower courts
decision in June 2005. The plaintiff moved for a rehearing en
banc which was subsequently denied. On January 9, 2006,
plaintiffs petition for certiorari to the
U.S. Supreme Court was denied.
On February 20, 2004, Texas Genco, LP filed an injunction
and declaratory judgment lawsuit in a Freestone County, Texas
state district court seeking to enjoin Valence Operating
Company, or Valence, from drilling or engaging in work to
prepare for drilling a natural gas well (Well 8) in Texas Genco,
L.P.s Class II Industrial Solid Waste Facility, which
we refer to as the Landfill, adjacent to Texas Gencos
Limestone Plant. The Landfill is used to dispose of ash
byproducts from the combustion of coal and lignite at the
Limestone Plant. Following a hearing in March 2004, the court
granted Texas Genco, LPs request and enjoined Valence
S-89
from drilling the well in the Landfill. In connection with that
injunction, the court ordered, and Texas Genco, LP posted, a
bond in the amount of $1.0 million to secure payment of any
damages suffered by Valence should it be found to have been
wrongfully enjoined. Valence filed a counter-claim against Texas
Genco, LP for wrongful injunction and sought to recover the full
amount of the bond. Trial on the merits in this case was held in
November 22, 2004. The jury found, among other things, that
Texas Genco, LP had an existing use that would be precluded or
substantially impaired if Valence drilled Well 8. The jury also
found damages in the amount of $400,000 as compensation to
Valence for the issuance of the temporary restraining order and
temporary injunction. Both Texas Genco, LP and Valence moved to
disregard certain of the jurys findings and for judgment
in their respective favors. On October 24, 2004, the court
accepted the jurys findings and entered judgment that
Texas Genco, LP take nothing on its claim for permanent
injunction, and that Valence recover $400,000 in damages,
together with pre- and post-judgment interest and costs. The
court also reinstated the temporary injunction pending
resolution of Texas Genco, LPs appeal and also ordered,
and Texas Genco posted, a bond in the amount of approximately
$860,000 in connection with the temporary injunction. The bond
shall be increased on a monthly basis after February 2006. Texas
Genco, LP filed a timely appeal to the Waco County Court of
Appeals. On January 18, 2006, the court reversed the trial
courts decision ordering that Valence take nothing on its
counterclaim and remanding the case back to trial court for
entry of a permanent injunction enjoining Valence from drilling
Well 8.
In addition, a separate lawsuit was filed by Texas Genco, LP in
the same court, to enjoin Valence from drilling another well
(Well 9) in the Landfill. On October 26, 2004, Texas
Genco, LP also obtained a temporary restraining order against
drilling this other well. The court ordered, and Texas Genco, LP
posted, a bond in the amount of approximately $2.0 million
to secure payment of any damages suffered by Valence should it
be found to have been wrongfully enjoined in this second
lawsuit. The court recently increased the bond amount to
$2.8 million, and has rescheduled this case to
February 6, 2006 for trial on the merits.
Valence currently has two active applications with the Railroad
Commission of Texas for drilling permits for two additional
wells that would be drilled in the Landfill, one of which would
be drilled through the closed cells in Texas Genco, LPs
Landfill. Texas Genco, LP has filed a protest with the Railroad
Commission of Texas over these applications, and a hearing was
held at the Railroad Commission in April 2005. The hearing
examiners recommended denying the permit for one well and
granting the other. A ruling by the Railroad Commission is
expected in the next few weeks. Texas Genco, LP is vigorously
contesting these attempts to drill into the Landfill because
such drilling activity impairs Texas Genco, LPs use of its
property for the Landfill.
|
|
|
Texas Genco Asbestos Litigation |
The Texas Genco plants are the subject of a number of lawsuits
filed against numerous defendants in addition to Texas Genco
Holdings, Inc., by a large number of individuals who claim
personal injury due to alleged exposure to asbestos while
working at plant sites in Texas. Most of these claimants have
been third party contractor or sub-contractor employees who
participated in the construction, renovation or repair of
various industrial plants, including power plants. While many of
the claimants have never worked at or near Texas Gencos
plants, some of the claimants have worked at locations owned by
Texas Genco. We anticipate that additional claims like those
that have been asserted to date may be asserted in the future.
Texas Genco defends these claims aggressively, and, thus, has
incurred and expects to continue to incur defense costs as a
result of such claims. In addition, while Texas Genco has been
dismissed from many of these lawsuits without having to make any
payment to claimants, it has incurred and expects to continue to
incur some costs associated with the settlement of certain
claims. Texas Genco intends to continue its practice of
vigorously contesting claims that it does not consider to have
merit. To date, costs of settlement and defense have not
materially affected Texas Genco, and a portion of the payments
in respect of these claims have been offset by insurance
recoveries.
The Texas legislature recently adopted amendments to state law
that will make it more difficult for persons claiming personal
injuries due to alleged exposure to asbestos to continue to
pursue their claims when there is no medical evidence of an
actual physical impairment caused by exposure to asbestos. This
new legislation, which was signed into law by the Governor of
Texas on May 19, 2005, precludes persons whose claims have
not been adjudicated by September 1, 2005 from pursuing or
advancing their claims until they have produced a report by a
board-certified physician that confirms that the claimant has
met the standards
S-90
for an actual physical impairment caused by exposure to
asbestos, as specified in the legislation. This amendment to
state law resulted in some increased claim activity prior to
September 1, 2005, but after that date is expected to
result in fewer new claims and overall lower costs of defending
and settling claims not adjudicated by that date. As of
December 31, 2005, there were 3,803 claims pending against
Texas Genco Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Texas
Genco LLC. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2005,
there were 268 claims filed against Texas Genco Holdings, Inc.,
146 claims settled, 1,261 claims dismissed or otherwise resolved
with no payment and the average settlement amount for each claim
was approximately $3,600. Under the terms of the separation
agreement between Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. and CenterPoint
Energy, ultimate financial responsibility for uninsured losses
relating to such claims has been assumed by Texas Genco
Holdings, Inc., and under the terms of CenterPoint Energys
agreement to sell Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. to Texas Genco LLC,
CenterPoint Energy has agreed to continue to defend such claims
to the extent they are covered by insurance maintained by
CenterPoint Energy, subject to reimbursement of the costs of
such defense from Texas Genco LLC.
In addition, Congress is currently considering the proposed
Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2005, which, if it
becomes law, would require asbestos defendants and insurers to
make payments into a privately-funded national asbestos
compensation fund. Under the bill as currently drafted, payments
made by us would not be offset by any insurance recoveries. The
proposed legislation remains subject to negotiation and
modification.
|
|
|
California Wholesale Electricity Litigation and Related
Investigations |
NRG, WCP, WCPs four operating subsidiaries, Dynegy, Inc.
and numerous other unrelated parties are the subject of numerous
lawsuits arising based on events occurring in the California
power market. The complaints primarily allege that the
defendants engaged in unfair business practices, price fixing,
antitrust violations, and other market gaming
activities. Certain of these lawsuits originally commenced in
2000 and 2001, which seek unspecified treble damages and
injunctive relief, were consolidated and made a part of a
Multi-District Litigation proceeding before the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of California. In December 2002,
the district court found that federal jurisdiction was absent
and remanded the cases back to state court. On December 8,
2004, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed
the district court in most respects. On March 3, 2005, the
Ninth Circuit denied a motion for rehearing. On May 5,
2005, the case was remanded to California state court and, under
a scheduling order, defendants filed their objections to the
pleadings. On July 22, 2005, based upon the filed rate
doctrine and federal preemption, the court dismissed NRG Energy,
Inc. without prejudice, leaving only subsidiaries of WCP
remaining in the case. On October 3, 2005, the court
sustained defendants demurrer dismissing the case against
all remaining defendants. On December 2, 2005, the
plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal from the dismissal.
In 2002, a number of cases similar to those described above were
filed against defendants, including WCP or one or more of its
operating subsidiaries and/or Dynegy, Inc., which we refer to as
the Northern California cases. On February 25, 2005, the
Ninth Circuit affirmed the district courts decision to
dismiss all of the defendants Northern California cases.
No appeal was taken from this decision.
In addition to the cases discussed above, other cases, including
putative class actions, have been filed in state and federal
court on behalf of business and residential electricity
consumers that name NRG and/or WCP and/or certain subsidiaries
of WCP, in addition to numerous other defendants. The complaints
allege the defendants attempted to manipulate gas indexes by
reporting false and fraudulent trades, and violated
Californias antitrust law and unfair business practices
law. The complaints seek restitution and disgorgement, civil
fines, compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys fees
and declaratory and injunctive relief. Motion practice is
proceeding in these cases and dispositive motions have been
filed in several of these proceedings. In the above referenced
cases relating to natural gas, Dynegy is defending WCP and/or
its subsidiaries pursuant to an indemnification agreement and
will be the responsible party for any loss. In cases relating to
electricity, Dynegys counsel is representing it and WCP
and/or its subsidiaries with each party responsible for half of
the costs and each party shall be responsible for half of any
loss. Where NRG is named as a party in an electricity case, it
is defending the case and bears its own costs of defense.
S-91
There are proceedings in which WCP and WCP subsidiaries are
parties, which either are pending before FERC or on appeal from
FERC to various U.S. Courts of Appeal. These cases involve,
among other things, allegations of physical withholding, a
FERC-established price mitigation plan determining maximum rates
for wholesale power transactions in certain spot markets, and
the enforceability of, and obligations under, various contracts
with, among others, the Cal ISO, the California Department of
Water Resources, or CDWR, and the State of California. The CDWR
claim involves a February 2002 complaint filed by the State of
California demanding that FERC abrogate the CDWR contract
between the State and subsidiaries of WCP and seeking refunds
associated with revenues collected from CDWR. In 2003, FERC
rejected this demand and denied rehearing. The case was appealed
to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit where oral
argument was held December 8, 2004.
|
|
|
California Attorney General |
The California Attorney General has undertaken an investigation
entitled In the Matter of the Investigation of Possibly
Unlawful, Unfair, or Anti-Competitive Behavior Affecting
Electricity Prices in California. Dynegy, NRG and
subsidiaries of WCP have responded to interrogatories, document
requests and to requests for interviews.
Canadian Claim
On June 30, 2005, three individuals filed a lawsuit with
the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against more than 20 power
generating entities in the U.S. and Canada, including the
Keystone and Conemaugh facility ownership groups. Two of
NRGs subsidiaries own less than four percent of each of
these Pennsylvania coal-fired plants. The plaintiffs, on behalf
of a purported class of Ontario residents, have alleged air
pollution and associated health effects and asserted damages in
excess of CA$50 billion (US $43.1 billion, based on
conversion rates as of September 30, 2005). The claim was
not served on any defendant by December 30, 2005.
Accordingly, the claim is inactive and may be revived only if
plaintiffs file a motion to extend the time for service and the
court grants the motion. Alternatively, plaintiffs could seek to
file a new claim.
New York Operating Reserve
Markets
Consolidated Edison and others petitioned the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review of
FERCs refusal to order a re-determination of prices in the
New York Independent System Operator, or NYISO, operating
reserve markets for a two month period in 2000. On
November 7, 2003, the court found that NYISOs method
of pricing spinning reserves violated the NYISO tariff. On
March 4, 2005, FERC issued an order favorable to NRG
stating that no refunds would be required for the tariff
violation associated with the pricing of spinning reserves. In
the order, FERC also stated that the exclusion of the
Blenheim-Gilboa facility and western reserves from the
non-spinning market was not a market flaw and NYISO was correct
not to use its authority to revise the prices in this market. A
motion for rehearing of the order was filed before the
April 3, 2005 deadline and on November 17, 2005, FERC
denied rehearing. On January 13, 2006, the petitioners
filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit.
Connecticut Congestion
Charges
On November 28, 2001, Connecticut Light & Power, or
CL&P, sought recovery in the U.S. District Court for
Connecticut for amounts it claimed were owed for congestion
charges under the October 29, 1999 Standard Offer Services
Contract. CL&P withheld approximately $30 million from
amounts owed to PMI under contract and PMI counterclaimed.
CL&Ps motion for summary judgment, which PMI opposed,
remains pending. We cannot estimate at this time the overall
exposure for congestion charges for the term of the contract
prior to the implementation of standard market design, which
occurred on March 1, 2003; however, such amount has been
fully reserved as a reduction to outstanding accounts receivable.
New York Environmental
Settlement
In January 2002, the New York Department of Environmental
Conservation, or NYSDEC, sued Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation,
or NiMo, and NRG in federal court in New York, asserting that
projects
S-92
undertaken at NRGs Huntley and Dunkirk plants by NiMo, the
former owner of the facilities, violated federal and state laws.
On January 11, 2005, NRG reached an agreement to settle
this matter whereby NRG will reduce levels of sulfur dioxide by
over 86 percent and nitrogen oxide by over 80 percent
in aggregate at the Huntley and Dunkirk plants. NRG is not
subject to any penalty as a result of the settlement. Through
the end of the decade, NRG expects that its ongoing compliance
with the emissions limits set out in the settlement will be
achieved through capital expenditures already planned. This
includes NRGs conversion to low sulfur western coal at the
Huntley and Dunkirk plants, which will be completed by spring
2006. On April 7, 2005, NYSDEC filed a motion with the
court to enter the Consent Decree, and on April 19, 2005,
NRG filed a supporting motion. On June 3, 2005, the U.S.
District Court for the Western District of New York entered the
Consent Decree permitting the settlement and ending the case.
On October 24, 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit issued its opinion in New York Public Interest
Research Group (NYPIRG) v. Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In
2000, the NYSDEC issued a NOV to the prior owner of the Huntley
and Dunkirk stations. After an unsuccessful challenge to the
stations Title V air quality permits by NYPIRG, it
appealed. The Second Circuit held that, during the Title V
permitting process for the two stations, the 2000 NOV should
have been sufficient for the NYSDEC to have made a finding that
the stations were out of compliance. Accordingly, the court
stated that the EPA should have objected to the Title V
permits on that basis and the permits should have included
compliance schedules. As discussed above, on June 3, 2005,
the consent decree among NYSDEC, NiMo, and NRG was entered,
settling the substantive issues discussed by the Second Circuit
in its decision. NYSDEC is in the process of incorporating the
consent decree obligations into the Huntley and Dunkirk
Title V permits so as to make them permit conditions, an
action we believe is supported by the decision. On
January 12, 2006, the NYSDEC, the EPA and NRG filed
individual petitions for rehearing with the Second Circuit.
Station Service
Disputes
On October 2, 2000, NiMo commenced an action against NRG in
New York state court seeking damages related to NRGs
alleged failure to pay retail tariff amounts for utility
services at the Dunkirk Plant between June 1999 and September
2000. The parties agreed to consolidate this action with two
other actions against the Huntley and Oswego Plants. On
October 8, 2002, by stipulation and order, this action was
stayed pending submission to FERC of some or all of the disputes
in the action. The contingent loss from this case is
approximately $24.9 million, and at this time we believe we
are adequately reserved. In a companion action at FERC, NiMo
asserted the same claims and legal theories, and on
November 19, 2004, FERC denied NiMos petition and
ruled that the NRG facilities could net their service
obligations over each 30 calendar day period from the day NRG
acquired the facilities. In addition, FERC ruled that neither
NiMo nor the New York Public Service Commission could impose a
retail delivery charge on the NRG facilities because they are
interconnected to transmission and not to distribution. On
April 22, 2005, FERC denied NiMos motion for
rehearing. NiMo appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
D.C. Circuit which, on May 12, 2005, consolidated the
appeal with several pending station service disputes involving
NiMo. All parties filed their briefs prior to the
January 17, 2006 deadline.
On December 14, 1999, NRG acquired certain generating
facilities from CL&P. A dispute arose over station service
power and delivery services provided to the facilities. On
December 20, 2002, as a result of a petition filed at FERC
by Northeast Utilities Services Company on behalf of itself and
CL&P, FERC issued an order finding that, at times when NRG
is not able to self-supply its station power needs, there is a
sale of station power from a third-party and retail charges
apply. In August 2003, the parties agreed to submit the dispute
to binding arbitration, however, the parties have yet to agree
on a description of the dispute and on the appointment of a
neutral arbitrator. The contingent loss from this case could
exceed $4.8 million, and at this time we believe we are
adequately reserved.
U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency
On January 27, 2004, our subsidiaries, Louisiana
Generating, LLC and Big Cajun II, received an initial and,
thereafter, subsequent requests under Section 114 of the
federal Clean Air Act from EPA Region 6
S-93
seeking information primarily relating to physical changes made
at Big Cajun II. Louisiana Generating, LLC and Big Cajun II
submitted several responses to the USEPA. On February 15,
2005, Louisiana Generating, LLC received a NOV alleging
violations of the NSR provisions of the Clean Air Act at Big
Cajun II Units 1 and 2 from 1998 through the NOV date. On
April 7, 2005, a meeting was held with USEPA and the
Department of Justice and additional information was provided to
the agency.
Itiquira Energetica,
S.A.
NRGs Brazilian project company, Itiquira Energetica S.A.,
or Itiquira, the owner of a 156 MW hydro project in Brazil, is
in arbitration with the former EPC contractor for the project,
Inepar Industria e Construcoes, or Inepar. The dispute was
commenced in arbitration by Itiquira in September of 2002 and
pertains to certain matters arising under the engineering
procurement and construction contract between the parties.
Itiquira sought Real 140 million and asserted that Inepar
breached the contract. Inepar sought Real 39 million and
alleged that Itiquira breached the contract. On
September 2, 2005, the arbitration panel ruled in favor of
Itiquira, awarding it Real 139 million (US
$62.3 million, based on conversion rates as of
September 30, 2005) and Inepar Real 4.7 million (US
$2.1 million, based on conversion rates as of
September 30, 2005). Due to interest accrued from the
commencement of the arbitration to the award date,
Itiquiras award is increased to approximately Real
227 million (U.S. $100 million, based on conversion
rates as of September 30, 2005). Itiquira has commenced the
lengthy process in Brazil to execute on the arbitral award. We
are unable to predict the outcome of this execution process. On
October 14, 2005, Inepar filed with the arbitration panel a
request for clarifications of the ruling and Itiquira objected.
On December 21, 2005, Inepars request for
clarifications was denied. Due to the uncertainty of the
collection process, NRG is accounting for receipt of any amounts
as a gain contingency.
CFTC Trading Litigation
On July 1, 2004, the Commodities Futures Trading
Commission, or CFTC, filed a civil complaint against NRG in
Minnesota federal district court, alleging false reporting of
natural gas trades from August 2001 to May 2002, and seeking an
injunction against future violations of the Commodity Exchange
Act. On November 17, 2004, a bankruptcy court hearing was
held on the CFTCs motion to reinstate its expunged
bankruptcy claim, and on NRGs motion to enforce the
provisions of the NRG plan of reorganization, thereby precluding
the CFTC from continuing its federal court action. The
bankruptcy court has yet to schedule a hearing or rule on the
CFTCs pending motion to reinstate its expunged claim. On
December 6, 2004, a federal magistrate judge issued a
report and recommendation that NRGs motion to dismiss be
granted. That motion to dismiss was granted by the federal
district court in Minnesota on March 16, 2005. On
May 13, 2005 the CFTC filed a notice of appeal with the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The CFTC filed its
brief on August 9, 2005, and on September 29, 2005 NRG
filed its brief. On October 28, 2005, the CFTC filed its
reply brief.
Disputed Claims Reserve
As part of the NRG plan of reorganization confirmed on
November 24, 2003, NRG has funded a disputed claims reserve
for the satisfaction of certain general unsecured claims that
were disputed claims as of the effective date of the plan. Under
the terms of the plan, to the extent such claims are resolved
now that NRG has emerged from bankruptcy, the claimants will be
paid from the reserve on the same basis as if they had been paid
out in the bankruptcy. That means that their allowed claims will
be reduced to the same recovery percentage as other creditors
would have received and will be paid in pro rata distributions
of cash and common stock. We believe we have funded the disputed
claims reserve at a sufficient level to settle the remaining
unresolved proofs of claim we received during the bankruptcy
proceedings. However, to the extent the aggregate amount of
these payouts of disputed claims ultimately exceeds the amount
of the funded claims reserve, we are obligated to provide
additional cash, notes and common stock to the claimants. We
will continue to monitor our obligation as the disputed claims
are settled. If excess funds remain in the disputed claims
reserve after payment of all obligations, such amounts will be
reallocated to the creditor pool. NRG has contributed common
stock and cash to an escrow agent to complete the distribution
and settlement process.
S-94
Since NRG has surrendered control over the common stock and cash
provided to the disputed claims reserve, NRG recognized the
issuance of the common stock as of December 6, 2003 and
removed the cash amounts from its balance sheet. Similarly, NRG
removed the obligations relevant to the claims from its balance
sheet when the common stock was issued and cash contributed.
Properties
For a description of our interests in independent power
production and cogeneration facilities, see Regional
Business Descriptions Texas (ERCOT)
Facilities, Regional Business
DescriptionsNortheast Region Facilities,
Regional Business DescriptionsSouth Central
Region Facilities, Regional Business
DescriptionsWestern Region Facilities,
Regional Business DescriptionsOther
Other North American Assets and Regional
Business DescriptionsOther Australia and All Other
Generation and Non-Generation Assets.
Listed below are descriptions of our interests in thermal and
chilled water facilities as of September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% | |
|
|
|
|
Date of | |
|
|
|
Ownership | |
|
Thermal Energy |
Name and Location of Facility |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Generating Capacity(1) |
|
Interest | |
|
Purchaser/MSW Supplier |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
NRG Energy Center
Minneapolis, MN
|
|
|
1993 |
|
|
Steam: 1,203 mmBtu/hr. (353 MWt) Chilled Water: 41,630 tons
(146 MWt)
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Approx. 100 steam customers and 47 chilled water customers
|
NRG Energy Center
San Francisco, CA
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
Steam: 482 mmBtu/Hr. (141 MWt)
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Approx. 165 steam customers
|
NRG Energy Center
Harrisburg, PA
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
Steam: 440 mmBtu/hr. (129 MWt) Chilled water: 2,400 tons
(8 MWt)
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Approx. 265 steam customers and 3 chilled water customers
|
NRG Energy Center
Pittsburgh, PA
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
Steam: 266 mmBtu/hr. (78 MWt) Chilled water: 12,580 tons
(44 MWt)
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Approx. 25 steam and 25 chilled water customers
|
NRG Energy Center
San Diego, CA
|
|
|
1997 |
|
|
Chilled water: 7,425 tons (26 MWt)
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Approx. 20 chilled water customers
|
NRG Energy Center
St. Paul , MN
|
|
|
1992 |
|
|
Steam: 430 mmBtu/hr. (126 MWt)
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Rock-Tenn Company
|
Camas Power Boiler,
Washington
|
|
|
1997 |
|
|
Steam: 200 mm Btu/hr. (59 MWt)
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Georgia-Pacific Corp.
|
NRG Energy Center
Dover, DE
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
Steam: 190 mmBtu/hr. (56 MWt)
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Kraft Foods Inc.
|
NRG Energy Center
Oak Park Heights, MN
|
|
|
1992 |
|
|
Steam: 200 mmBtu/Hr. (59 MWt)
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Andersen Corp., MN
Correctional Facility
|
|
|
(1) |
Thermal production and transmission capacity is based on 1,000
Btus per pound of steam production or transmission capacity. The
unit mmBtu is equal to one million Btus. |
Listed below are descriptions of our significant resource
recovery assets as of September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% | |
|
|
Name and Location |
|
Date of | |
|
|
|
Ownership | |
|
|
of Facility |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Processing Capacity(1) |
|
Interest | |
|
MSW Supplier |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Newport,
MN(1)
|
|
|
1993 |
|
|
MSW: 1,500 tons/day
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Ramsey and Washington Counties
|
Elk River,
MN(2)
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
MSW: 1,500 tons/day
|
|
|
85 |
% |
|
Anoka, Hennepin and Sherburne Counties; Tri-County Solid Waste
Management Commissioner
|
|
|
(1) |
The Newport facilities are strictly related to garbage-sorting
facilities. |
|
|
(2) |
For the Elk River facility, NRGs 85% interest is related
strictly to garbage-sorting facilities. |
S-95
In addition, we own various real property and facilities
relating to our generation assets, other vacant real property
unrelated to our generation assets, interests in other
construction projects in various states of completion and
properties not used for operational purposes. We believe we have
satisfactory title to our plants and facilities in accordance
with standards generally accepted in the electric power
industry, subject to exceptions that, in our opinion, would not
have a material adverse effect on the use or value of our
portfolio.
We lease our corporate offices at 211 Carnegie Center,
Princeton, New Jersey 08540 and various other office spaces,
including a 66 month lease of approximately 50,000 square
feet in Houston, Texas, which serves as our regional
headquarters for the ERCOT market.
S-96
MANAGEMENT
Directors and Certain Officers of NRG
The following table sets out the names and ages of each of our
directors and certain of our officers, after giving effect to
the Acquisition, followed by a description of their business
experience:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Howard E. Cosgrove
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Director, Chairman of the Board |
John F. Chlebowski
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Director and Chair, Audit Committee |
Lawrence S. Coben
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Director and Chair, Compensation Committee |
David Crane
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Stephen L. Cropper
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Director and Chair, Commercial Operations Oversight Committee |
Maureen Miskovic
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Director |
Anne C. Schaumburg
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Director |
Herbert H. Tate
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Director |
Thomas H. Weidemeyer
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Director |
Walter R. Young
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Director and Chair, Governance and Nominating Committee |
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Crane
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Robert C. Flexon
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Caroline Angoorly
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Vice President, Environmental and New Business |
John P. Brewster
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, International Operations and
President, South Central Region |
Scott J. Davido
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and President, Northeast Region |
Kevin T. Howell
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Commercial Operations |
James J. Ingoldsby
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Vice President and Controller |
Christine A. Jacobs
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Vice President, Plant Operations |
Timothy W.J. OBrien
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Vice President and General Counsel |
George P. Schaefer
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Vice President and Treasurer |
Steve Winn
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and President, Texas Region |
Board of Directors
The Board is divided into three classes serving staggered
three-year terms. Directors for each class are elected at our
annual meeting of stockholders held in the year in which the
term for their class expires. There are no family relationships
among our officers and directors.
Class I Directors (Terms expire in 2007)
David Crane
Member of Commercial Operations
Oversight Committee
Mr. Crane has served as the President, Chief Executive
Officer and a director of NRG since December 2003. Prior to
joining NRG, Mr. Crane served as Chief Executive Officer of
International Power PLC, a UK-
S-97
domiciled wholesale power generation company, from January 2003
to November 2003, and as Chief Operating Officer from March 2000
through December 2002. Mr. Crane was Senior Vice
President Global Power New York at Lehman Brothers Inc.,
an investment banking firm, from January 1999 to February 2000,
and was Senior Vice President Global Power Group, Asia
(Hong Kong) at Lehman Brothers from June 1996 to January 1999.
Stephen L. Cropper
Chair of Commercial Operations
Oversight Committee
Mr. Cropper has been a director of NRG since December 2003,
pursuant to the NRG plan of reorganization. Mr. Cropper
spent 25 years with The Williams Companies, an energy
company, before retiring in 1998 as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Williams Energy Services. Mr. Cropper
is a director of Berry Petroleum Company, Sunoco Logistics
Partners L.P. and Rental Car Finance Corporation, a subsidiary
of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group and QuikTrip Corporation.
Maureen Miskovic
Member of Commercial Operations
Oversight Committee
Ms. Miskovic has been a Director of NRG since September
2005. She currently serves as Chief Operating Officer of the
Eurasia Group, a research and consulting firm focusing on
political-risk analysis and industry research for global
markets, where she oversees the firms continued expansion
and serves as chief advisor for the companys political
risk services. She also acts as the principal liaison for
Eurasia Groups joint venture with Deutsche Bank, which
includes the DESIX, the first global political risk index on
Wall Street. Miskovic joined Eurasia Group in September 2002
after six years with Lehman Brothers, where she was Managing
Director and Chief Global Risk Officer. Prior to joining Lehman
Brothers, Miskovic was Treasurer at Morgan Stanley in London and
before that she held various positions with SG Warburg, also in
London.
Thomas H. Weidemeyer
Member of Compensation Committee
Mr. Weidemeyer has been a director of NRG since December
2003, pursuant to the NRG plan of reorganization. Until his
retirement in December 2003, Mr. Weidemeyer served as
Director, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of
United Parcel Service, Inc., the worlds largest
transportation company and President of UPS Airlines.
Mr. Weidemeyer became Manager of the Americas International
Operation in 1989, and in that capacity directed the development
of the UPS delivery network throughout Central and South
America. In 1990, Mr. Weidemeyer became Vice President and
Airline Manager of UPS Airlines and in 1994 was elected its
President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Weidemeyer
became Senior Vice President and a member of the Management
Committee of United Parcel Service, Inc. that same year, and he
became Chief Operating Officer of United Parcel Service, Inc. in
2001. Mr. Weidemeyer also serves as a director of Goodyear
Tire & Rubber Co. and Waste Management, Inc.
Class II Directors (Terms expire in 2008)
Lawrence S. Coben
Chair of Compensation Committee
Mr. Coben has been a director of NRG since December 2003,
pursuant to the NRG plan of reorganization. He is Chairman and
CEO of Tremisis Energy Acquisition Corporation. From January
2001 to January 2004, he was a Senior Principal of Sunrise
Capital Partners, a private equity firm. From 1997 to 2001,
Mr. Coben was an independent consultant. From 1994 to 1996,
Mr. Coben was Chief Executive Officer of Bolivian Power
Company. Mr. Coben is also a director of Prisma Energy.
S-98
Herbert H. Tate
Member of Governance and
Nominating Committee
Mr. Tate has been a director of NRG since December 2003,
pursuant to the NRG plan of reorganization. Mr. Tate joined
NiSource, Inc. as Corporate Vice President, Regulatory Strategy
in July 2004. He was Of Counsel of Wolf & Samson P.C., a law
firm, since September 2002 to July 2004. Mr. Tate was
Research Professor of Energy Policy Studies at the New Jersey
Institute of Technology from April 2001 to September 2002 and
President of New Jersey Board of Public Utilities from 1994 to
March 2001. Mr. Tate is also a director of IDT Capital and
IDT Spectrum. Previously, Mr. Tate was a member of the
Board of Directors for Central Vermont Public Service from April
2001 to June 2004, where he was a member of the Audit Committee.
Walter R. Young
Chair of Governance and Nominating
Committee
Mr. Young has been a director of NRG since December 2003,
pursuant to the NRG plan of reorganization. Mr. Young was
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Champion
Enterprises, Inc., an assembler and manufacturer of manufactured
homes, from May 1990 to June 2003. Mr. Young has held
senior management positions with The Henley Group, The Budd
Company and BFGoodrich.
Class III Directors (Terms expire in 2006)
John F. Chlebowski
Chair of Audit Committee
Member of Governance and
Nominating Committee
Mr. Chlebowski has been a director of NRG since December
2003, pursuant to the NRG plan of reorganization.
Mr. Chlebowski served as the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Lakeshore Operating Partners, LLC, a bulk liquid
distribution firm, from March 2000 until his retirement in
December 2004. From July 1999 until March 2000,
Mr. Chlebowski was a senior executive and cofounder of
Lakeshore Liquids Operating Partners, LLC, a private venture
firm in the bulk liquid distribution and logistics business, and
from January 1998 until July 1999, he was a private investor and
consultant in bulk liquid distribution. Prior to that, he was
employed by GATX Terminals Corporation, a subsidiary of GATX
Corporation, as President and Chief Executive Officer from 1994
until 1997. Mr. Chlebowski is a director of Laidlaw
International Inc.
Howard E. Cosgrove
Chairman of the Board
Member of Audit Committee
Mr. Cosgrove has been a director of NRG since December
2003, pursuant to the NRG plan of reorganization, and Chairman
of the Board since December 2003. He was Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Conectiv and its predecessor Delmarva Power
and Light from December 1992 to August 2002. Prior to December
1992, Mr. Cosgrove held various positions with Delmarva
Power and Light including Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer. Mr. Cosgrove serves as Chairman of the
Board of Trustees at the University of Delaware.
Anne C. Schaumburg
Member of Audit Committee
Ms. Schaumburg has been a director of NRG since April 2005.
From 1984 until her retirement in 2002, she was at Credit Suisse
First Boston in the Global Energy Group, where she last served
as Managing Director. From 1979 to 1984, she was in the
Utilities Group at Dean Witter Financial Services Group, where
she last served as Managing Director. From 1971 to 1978, she was
at The First Boston Corporation in the Public Utilities Group.
S-99
Certain Officers
Our officers are elected by our board of directors annually to
hold office until their successors are elected and qualified.
David Crane
President and Chief Executive
Officer
For biographical information for David Crane, see
Board of Directors.
Robert C. Flexon
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Mr. Flexon has been Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of NRG since March 2004. In this capacity, he
manages NRGs corporate finance, accounting, tax, risk
management, information technology, and overall internal control
program. Prior to joining NRG, Mr. Flexon was Vice
President, Corporate Development & Work Process and Vice
President, Business Analysis and Controller of Hercules, Inc.
for four years. Mr. Flexon also held various financial
management positions, including General Auditor, Franchise
Manager and Controller, during his 13 years with Atlantic
Richfield Company. Mr. Flexon began his career with the
former Coopers & Lybrand public accounting firm.
Caroline Angoorly
Vice President, Environmental and
New Business
Ms. Angoorly has served as Vice President, Environmental
& New Business for NRG since May 2004. She is responsible
for our strategy and initiatives in the environmental and green
business arenas. Prior to joining NRG, Ms. Angoorly served
as Vice President and General Counsel at Enel North America,
Inc., a Director and the Chief Financial Officer at Line56Media,
and a partner in the Global Project Finance Group at Milbank,
Tweed, Hadley & McCloy. Ms. Angoorly holds a Bachelor
of Science degree in Geology and a Bachelor of Laws degree from
Monash University in Melbourne, Australia. She also holds a
Master of Business Administration degree, with an emphasis on
international finance and economics, from Melbourne and Columbia
Business Schools.
John P. Brewster
Executive Vice President,
International Operations and President, South Central Region
Mr. Brewster has been Executive Vice President,
International Operations and President, South Central Region of
NRG since March 2004. He is responsible for managing the asset
portfolio for NRGs South Central Region and international
operations. Previously, he served as Vice President, Worldwide
Operations of NRG, Vice President, North American Operations and
Vice President of Production for NRG Louisiana Generating, Inc.
Prior to joining NRG, Mr. Brewster spent 22 years with
Cajun Electric Power Cooperative where he served as Vice
President of Production, Manager of Power System Operations and
Assistant Plant Manager.
Scott J. Davido
Executive Vice President and
President, Northeast Region
Mr. Davido has been Executive Vice President and President,
Northeast Region of NRG since March 2004 and served as Senior
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from October 2002
to March 2004. Mr. Davido also served as Chairman of the
Board from May 2003 to December 2003, the period in which NRG
was reorganizing under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code.
He served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary of the Elder-Beerman Stores Corp., a
department store retailer, from March 1999 to May 2002 and
Senior Vice President, General Counsel from January 1998 to
March 1999. Mr. Davido was a Partner, Business Practice
Group with Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, a law firm, in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, from January 1997 to December 1997 and
an Associate, Business Practice
S-100
Group from September 1987 to December 1996. On January 25,
2006, Mr. Davido submitted his resignation effective
January 31, 2006.
Kevin T. Howell
Executive Vice President,
Commercial Operations
Mr. Howell has been Executive Vice President, Commercial
Operations since August 2005 and is responsible for the
commercial management of the North America asset portfolio.
Prior to joining NRG, he served as President of Dominion Energy
Clearinghouse since 2001. From 1995 to 2001, Mr. Howell
held various positions within Duke Energy companies including
Senior Vice President of Duke Energy Trading and Marketing,
Senior Vice President of Duke Energy International, and most
recently, Executive Vice President of Duke Energy Merchants
where he managed a global trading group dealing in refined
products, LNG and coal. Prior to his five years at Duke,
Mr. Howell worked in a variety of trading, marketing and
operations functions at MG Natural Gas Corp., Associated Natural
Gas and Panhandle Eastern Pipeline.
James J. Ingoldsby
Vice President and Controller
Mr. Ingoldsby has been Vice President and Controller of NRG
since May 2004. He is responsible for directing NRGs
financial accounting and reporting activities, as well as
ensuring our compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley legislation.
Mr. Ingoldsby, who led the Sarbanes-Oxley implementation at
chemical company Hercules, Inc., previously held various
executive positions at GE Betz, formerly BetzDearborn from May
1993 to April 2003, including serving as Controller and Director
of Business Analysis and Director of Financial Reporting. He
also held various staff and managerial accounting and auditing
positions at Mack Trucks, Inc from February 1982 to May 1993.
Mr. Ingoldsby began his career with Deloitte and Touche
where he became a Certified Public Accountant.
Christine A. Jacobs
Vice President, Plant Operations
Ms. Jacobs has been Vice President, Plant Operations of NRG
since September 2004. She is responsible for domestic plant
operations, including safety, physical security, engineering and
procurement, and application of best operating practices.
Ms. Jacobs has more than 30 years of diverse operating
and commercial management experience. Prior to joining NRG, she
served as Executive Vice President, Facility Services/
Healthcare Management for Aramark Corporation from 2003 to 2004.
Additionally, Ms. Jacobs served as Senior Vice President,
Exelon Generation, and President, Exelon Power from 2000 to 2002.
Timothy W.J.
OBrien
Vice President and General Counsel
Mr. OBrien has been Vice President and General
Counsel of NRG since April 2004. He is responsible for legal
affairs at the Company. He served as Secretary from April 2004
to July 2005, as Deputy General Counsel of NRG from 2000 to 2004
and Assistant General Counsel from 1996 to 2000. Prior to
joining NRG, Mr. OBrien was an associate at Sheppard,
Mullin, Richter & Hampton in Los Angeles and San Diego,
California.
George P. Schaefer
Vice President and Treasurer
Mr. Schaefer has been Vice President and Treasurer since
December 2002. He is responsible for all treasury functions,
including bank relations and corporate and project finance
activities. Prior to joining NRG, Mr. Schaefer served as
Senior Vice President, Finance and Treasurer for PSEG Global,
Inc., an operator of power plants and utilities, for one year,
Vice President of Enron North America in its independent energy
unit from June 2000 to April 2001 and Vice President and
Treasurer of Reliant Energy International, an operator of power
plants and utilities, from June 1995 to June 2000. Prior to
1995, he was the Vice President, Business
S-101
Development for Entergy Power Group and held the Senior Vice
President, Structured Finance Group position with General
Electric Capital Corporation.
Steve Winn
Executive Vice President and
President, Texas Region
Mr. Winn was named Executive Vice President of NRG and,
upon the closing of the Acquisition, President, Texas Region. He
served as Vice President, Mergers and Acquisitions from April
2005 to December 2005 and as Director, Mergers and Acquisitions
from November 2004, when he joined NRG, to April 2005. Prior to
joining NRG, Mr. Winn worked in Power and Energy Investment
Banking at Lehman Brothers and Salomon Brothers. He has a
Masters of Business Administration from Cornell
Universitys Johnson School of Management, and a Bachelor
of Arts in Economics from the University of California at
Berkeley.
S-102
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Acquisition Agreement
Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, the direct and indirect
owners of equity units of Texas Genco, or the Sellers, will
receive approximately $6.121 billion comprised of
$4.399 billion in cash, subject to adjustment, a minimum of
35,406,320 shares of NRG common stock and, at NRGs
election, either an additional 9,038,125 shares of NRG common
stock, additional cash, shares of NRG preferred stock or a
combination of the foregoing. We have elected to pay this amount
in cash. The Sellers will be prohibited from transferring the
shares of common stock and preferred stock that they receive in
connection with the Acquisition for 180 days following the
closing date of the Acquisition.
Investor Rights Agreement
NRG and the Sellers will enter into an Investor Rights
Agreement, dated the closing date of the Acquisition, pursuant
to which NRG will file an evergreen shelf
registration statement, registering for resale upon expiration
of the 180-day
lock-up period by the
Sellers the shares of common stock and preferred stock that they
will receive pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement on or before
the date 120 days from the closing date of the Acquisition.
Any Seller or group of Sellers holding in excess of 3% of the
aggregate number of shares of NRG common stock issued and
outstanding, or 20% of the aggregate number of shares of
preferred stock originally issued pursuant to the Acquisition
Agreement, may request that a resale under the shelf
registration statement involve an underwritten offering, and NRG
will use its commercially reasonable efforts to make its
executive officers available to participate in road
shows or other selling efforts reasonably requested by the
Sellers, not to exceed one road show per
180-day period. The
Sellers will also be entitled to include shares of NRG common
stock and preferred stock they receive pursuant to the
Acquisition Agreement on any registration statement filed by NRG
that would permit registration of such shares of common stock
and preferred stock for sale to the public.
In addition, until the second anniversary of the closing date of
the Acquisition, the Sellers will agree not to acquire any
additional voting securities of NRG (subject to certain
exceptions), make any public announcement with respect to, or
submit any proposal for, any merger, dissolution or
restructuring involving NRG or any of its subsidiaries, solicit
proxies to vote any voting security of NRG or seek to influence
the vote of any voting securities of NRG, join, form or
participate in any group with respect to voting securities of
NRG, seek to call a meeting or execute a written consent of the
stockholders of NRG, seek representation on NRGs board of
directors or seek removal of a director from the board. Certain
Sellers will have the right to consult with and advise
management of NRG on matters relating to its operation. NRG will
agree to consider in good faith the reasonable recommendations
of such Sellers, but ultimate discretion with respect to all
matters will remain with NRG.
S-103
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The description below summarizes the more important terms of
our capital stock and does not purport to be complete. We have
previously filed with the SEC copies of our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation, our amended and restated by-laws,
our registration statement on Form 8-A and certificates of
designations for each series of our outstanding preferred stock.
See Where You Can Find More Information. You should
refer to those documents for the complete terms of our capital
stock.
Authorized Capital
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides
that we have authority to issue 500,000,000 shares of common
stock, par value $0.01, of which approximately
80,701,888 shares were outstanding on January 3, 2006,
and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per
share, of which 670,000 shares were outstanding on
January 3, 2006. After giving effect to the Financing
Transaction, we will have 101,556,945 shares of common stock
outstanding (104,685,204 shares of common stock outstanding if
the underwriters in this offering exercise their over-allotment
option in full). In addition, after giving affect to the
concurrent offering of mandatory convertible preferred stock, we
will have 2,670,000 shares of preferred stock outstanding
(2,970,000 shares of preferred stock outstanding if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full). On
January 3, 2006, 4,000,000 shares of common stock were
reserved for issuance under stock incentive plans or pursuant to
individual option grants or stock awards.
Common Stock
Except as otherwise provided by the Delaware General Corporation
Law, or the DGCL, or our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, the holders of our common stock, subject to the
rights of holders of any series of preferred stock, share
ratably in all dividends as may from time to time be declared by
our board of directors in respect of our common stock out of
funds legally available for the payment thereof and payable in
cash, stock or otherwise, and in all other distributions
(including, without limitation, our dissolution, liquidation and
winding up), whether in respect of liquidation or dissolution
(voluntary or involuntary) or otherwise, after payment of
liabilities and liquidation preference on any outstanding
preferred stock.
Except as otherwise provided by the DGCL or our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation and subject to the rights
of holders of any series of preferred stock, all the voting
power of our stockholders is vested in the holders of our common
stock, and each holder of our common stock has one vote for each
share held by such holder on all matters voted upon by our
stockholders.
Subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding shares of
preferred stock to act by written consent, our stockholders may
not take any action by written consent in lieu of a meeting and
must take any action at a duly called annual or special meeting
of stockholders.
The affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the
combined voting power of our outstanding shares eligible to vote
in the election of directors is required to alter, amend or
repeal provisions in the amended and restated certificate of
incorporation regarding indemnification, classification of
directors, action by written consent and changes to voting
requirements applicable to such provisions.
Our common stock is not convertible into, or exchangeable for,
any other class or series of our capital stock. Holders of our
common stock have no preemptive or other rights to subscribe for
or purchase additional securities of ours. We are subject to
Section 203 of the DGCL. Shares of our common stock are not
subject to calls or assessments. No personal liability will
attach to holders of our common stock under the laws of the
State of Delaware (our state of incorporation) or of the State
of New Jersey (the state in which our principal place of
business is located). All of the outstanding shares of our
common stock are fully paid and nonassessable.
S-104
|
|
|
Listing and Transfer Agent |
Our common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol NRG. The transfer agent
for the common stock is Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
1-800-468-9716, or
reachable, via email at website
www.wellsfargo.com/shareownerservices.
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
4% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock |
On December 27, 2004, NRG completed the sale of 420,000
shares of Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock with a dividend
coupon rate of 4%. The 4% Preferred Stock has a liquidation
preference of $1,000 per share. Holders of 4% Preferred Stock
are entitled to receive, when declared by NRGs board of
directors, cash dividends at the rate of 4% per annum, payable
quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September
15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on March 15,
2005. The 4% Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of
the holder, at any time into shares of NRG common stock. On or
after December 20, 2009, NRG may redeem, subject to certain
limitations, some or all of the 4% Preferred Stock with cash at
a redemption price equal to 100% of the liquidation preference,
plus accumulated but unpaid dividends, including liquidated
damages, if any, to the redemption date.
If NRG is subject to a fundamental change, as defined in the
Certificate of Designation of the 4% Preferred Stock, each
holder of shares of 4% Preferred Stock has the right, subject to
certain limitations, to require NRG to purchase any or all of
its shares of 4% Preferred Stock at a purchase price equal to
100% of the liquidation preference, plus accumulated and unpaid
dividends, including liquidated damages, if any, to the date of
purchase. Final determination of a fundamental change must be
approved by NRGs board of directors or the board of
directors must decide to take a neutral position with respect to
such fundamental change.
Each holder of 4% Preferred Stock has one vote for each share of
4% Preferred Stock held by the holder on all matters voted upon
by the holders of NRGs common stock, as well as voting
rights specifically provided for in NRGs amended and
restated certificate of incorporation or as otherwise from time
to time required by law. In addition, whenever
(1) dividends on the 4% Preferred Stock or any other class
or series of stock ranking on a parity with the 4% Preferred
Stock with respect to the payment of dividends are in arrears
for dividend periods, whether or not consecutive, containing in
the aggregate a number of days equivalent to six calendar
quarters, or (2) NRG fails to pay the redemption price on
the date shares of 4% Preferred Stock are called for redemption
or the purchase price on the purchase date for shares of 4%
Preferred Stock following a fundamental change, then, in each
case, the holders of 4% Preferred Stock (voting separately as a
class with all other series of preferred stock upon which like
voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable) are
entitled to vote for the election of two of the authorized
number of NRGs directors at the next annual meeting of
stockholders and at each subsequent meeting until all dividends
accumulated or the redemption price on the 4% Preferred Stock
have been fully paid or set apart for payment. The term of
office of all directors elected by holders of the 4% Preferred
Stock will terminate immediately upon the termination of the
rights of the holders of the 4% Preferred Stock to vote for
directors. Upon election of any additional directors, the number
of directors that comprise NRGs board of directors will be
increased by the number of such additional directors.
The 4% Preferred Stock is senior to all classes of common stock,
on a parity with the 3.625% Preferred Stock and upon issuance,
the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock and junior to all of
NRGs existing and future debt obligations and all of
NRGs subsidiaries existing and future liabilities
and capital stock held by persons other than NRG or its
subsidiaries. The proceeds of $406.4 million, net of
issuance costs of approximately $13.6 million, were used to
redeem $375.0 million of Second Priority Notes on
February 4, 2005.
|
|
|
3.625% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock |
On August 11, 2005, NRG issued 250,000 shares of its 3.625%
Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, or 3.625% Preferred
Stock, to Credit Suisse First Boston Capital LLC, or CSFB, in a
private placement. The 3.625% Preferred Stock has a liquidation
preference of $1,000 per share. Holders of the 3.625% Preferred
S-105
Stock are entitled to receive, out of funds legally available,
cash dividends at the rate of 3.625% per annum, payable in cash
quarterly in arrears commencing on December 15, 2005. Each
share of 3.625% Preferred Stock is convertible during the
90-day period beginning
August 11, 2015 at the option of NRG or the holder. Holders
tendering the 3.625% Preferred Stock for conversion shall be
entitled to receive cash and common stock. NRG may elect to make
cash payment in lieu of delivering shares of common stock in
connection with such conversion, and NRG may elect to receive
cash in lieu of shares of common stock, if any, from the holder
in connection with such conversion.
If NRG is subject to a fundamental change, as defined in the
Certificate of Designation of the 3.625% Preferred Stock, each
holder of shares of 3.625% Preferred Stock has the right,
subject to certain limitations, to require NRG to purchase any
or all of its shares of 3.625% Preferred Stock at a purchase
price equal to 100% of the liquidation preference, plus
accumulated and unpaid dividends, including liquidated damages,
if any, to the date of purchase.
The 3.625% Preferred Stock is senior to all classes of common
stock, on a parity with the 4% Preferred Stock and upon
issuance, the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock and junior
to all of NRGs existing and future debt obligations and
all of NRGs subsidiaries existing and future
liabilities and capital stock held by persons other than NRG or
its subsidiaries. Title to the 3.625% Preferred Stock, may not
be transferred to an entity that is not an affiliate of CSFB
without the consent of NRG, such consent not to be unreasonably
withheld. The proceeds were used to redeem $228.8 million
of Second Priority Notes on September 12, 2005.
|
|
|
Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock |
Concurrently with this offering, NRG is offering
$500 million of its 5.75% Mandatory Convertible Preferred
Stock, or Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to the
underwriters overallotment option. The Mandatory
Convertible Preferred Stock is expected to have a liquidation
preference of $250 per share. Dividends will accrue and cumulate
on the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock from the date of
issuance and, to the extent that we are legally permitted to pay
dividends and our board of directors, or an authorized committee
of our board of directors, declares a dividend payable, we will
pay dividends in cash on March 15, June 15, September
15 and December 15 of each year prior to March 15, 2009 or
the following business day if the 15th is not a business
day. Each share of Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock is
expected to automatically convert on March 15, 2009 into a
number of shares of common stock determined based on the price
of our common stock at such time, and holders are expected to be
entitled to receive an amount of cash equal to all accrued,
cumulated and unpaid dividends. It is expected that, upon the
occurrence of certain market conditions, NRG will be able to
cause the conversion of all, but not less than all, shares of
Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of NRG common
stock plus an amount of cash equal to all accrued, cumulated and
unpaid dividends and the present value of all remaining future
dividend payments on the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock
through March 15, 2009. In addition, holders of the
Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock are expected to have the
right to convert, at any time, the Mandatory Convertible
Preferred Stock into shares of NRG common stock at the minimum
conversion rate of 4.1356 shares of NRG common stock per
share of Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock plus an amount of
cash equal to all accrued, cumulated and unpaid dividends.
Holders are also expected to have the right to convert the
Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock upon certain merger events.
Whenever dividends on the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock
or any other class or series of stock ranking on a parity with
the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock with respect to the
payment of dividends are in arrears for dividend periods,
whether or not consecutive, containing in the aggregate a number
of days equivalent to six calendar quarters, then the holders of
Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock (voting separately as a
class with all other series of preferred stock upon which like
voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable) are
entitled to vote for the election of two of the authorized
number of NRGs directors at the next annual meeting of
stockholders and at each subsequent meeting until all dividends
accumulated on the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock have
been fully paid or set apart for payment. The term of office of
all directors elected by holders of the Mandatory Convertible
Preferred Stock will terminate immediately upon the termination
of the rights of the holders of the Mandatory Convertible
Preferred Stock to vote for
S-106
directors. Upon election of any additional directors, the number
of directors that comprise NRGs board of directors will be
increased by the number of such additional directors.
The Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock will be senior to all
classes of common stock, on parity with the 4% Preferred Stock
and the 3.625% Preferred Stock and junior to all of NRGs
existing and future debt obligations and all of NRGs
subsidiaries existing and future liabilities and capital
stock held by persons other than NRG or its subsidiaries.
Board of Directors; Classification of Directors
Except as otherwise provided in our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation or any duly authorized certificate
of designations of any series of preferred stock, directors are
elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares entitled to
vote in the election of directors present in person or
represented by proxy at the meeting of the stockholders at which
directors are elected.
At each annual meeting of stockholders, our directors are
elected to hold office until the expiration of the term for
which they are elected, and until their successors have been
duly elected and qualified; except that if any such election is
not so held, such election will take place at a
stockholders meeting called and held in accordance with
the DGCL. Our directors are divided into three classes as nearly
equal in size as is practicable, designated Class I,
Class II and Class III. At each annual meeting,
directors to replace those of a class whose terms expire at such
annual meeting will be elected to hold office until the third
succeeding annual meeting and until their respective successors
have been duly elected and qualified. If the number of directors
is changed, any newly created directorships or decrease in
directorships will be so apportioned among the classes as to
make all classes as nearly equal in number as practicable.
S-107
DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS
New Senior Secured Credit Facility
We plan to enter into a new senior secured credit facility for
up to an aggregate amount of $5.575 billion to replace
NRGs existing senior secured credit facility. The new
senior secured credit facility is expected to consist of a
$3.575 billion senior first priority secured term loan
facility, a $1.0 billion senior first priority secured
revolving credit facility and a $1.0 billion senior first
priority secured synthetic letter of credit facility.
We plan to use initial borrowings under our new senior secured
credit facility, together with the net proceeds from this
offering, the offerings of common stock and mandatory
convertible preferred stock and cash on hand, to finance the
Acquisition, to repay certain of our and Texas Gencos
outstanding indebtedness and to pay related premiums, fees and
expenses. See Use of Proceeds.
The following is a summary description of the principal terms
and conditions of the new senior secured credit facility. This
description is not intended to be exhaustive and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the provisions that will be
contained in the definitive credit agreement. As the final terms
of the senior secured credit facility have not been agreed upon,
the final terms may differ from those set forth herein and such
differences may be significant.
The senior secured credit facilitys $3.575 billion
term facility will mature on the seventh anniversary of its
closing date, and will amortize in 27 consecutive equal
quarterly installments in an aggregate annual amount equal to
1.0% of the original principal amount of the term facility
during the first
63/4
years thereof with the balance payable on the seventh
anniversary thereof. The $1.0 billion synthetic letter of
credit facility will mature on the seventh anniversary of the
closing date of the senior secured credit facility. The
$1.0 billion revolving facility will mature on the fifth
anniversary of the closing date of the senior secured credit
facility, and no amortization will be required in respect
thereof. Up to $50 million of the revolving credit facility
will be available as a swing-line facility; the full amount of
the revolving facility is available for the issuance of letters
of credit.
The revolving credit facility is expected to be undrawn at the
time of closing.
|
|
|
Guarantees and Collateral |
The senior secured credit facility will be guaranteed by
substantially all of our existing and future direct and indirect
subsidiaries, with certain customary or agreed-upon exceptions
for unrestricted foreign subsidiaries, project subsidiaries and
certain other subsidiaries. In addition, it will be secured by
liens on substantially all of the assets of NRG and the assets
of its subsidiaries, with certain customary or agreed-upon
exceptions for unrestricted foreign subsidiaries, project
subsidiaries and certain other subsidiaries. The capital stock
of substantially all of our subsidiaries, with certain
exceptions for unrestricted subsidiaries, foreign subsidiaries
and project subsidiaries, will be pledged for the benefit of the
senior secured credit facility lenders.
In addition to the foregoing, the senior secured credit facility
will be secured by a first-priority perfected security interest
in all of the property and assets owned at-any time or acquired
by NRG and its subsidiaries, other than (a) the assets of
certain unrestricted subsidiaries excluded project subsidiaries,
foreign subsidiaries and certain other subsidiaries, and (b)
(i) any lease, license, contract, property right or
agreement of NRG or any subsidiary guarantor, if and only for so
long as the grant of a security interest under the security
documents would result in a breach, termination or default under
that lease, license, contract, property right or agreement;
(ii) certain interests in real property owned or leased by
NRG and certain subsidiary guarantors; (iii) equity
interests in certain of NRGs project affiliates that have
non-recourse debt financing; (iv) any voting equity
interests in excess of 66% of the total outstanding voting
equity interest of certain of our foreign subsidiaries; and
(v) certain other limited exceptions.
S-108
At NRGs option, loans under the senior secured credit
facility will be available as Alternate Base Rate
loans or Eurodollar loans, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Alternate Base Rate loans. Interest is expected to be at
a spread (the Applicable Margin) over the Alternate
Base Rate for term loans and for revolving loans and swing-line
loans, calculated on a
365-day or
366-day basis, as the
case may be, when the Alternate Base Rate is determined by
reference to the prime rate, and on a
360-day basis at all
other times. The Alternate Base Rate shall mean, for
any day, a rate per annum equal to the greater of (a) the
prime rate publicly announced from time to time by
The Wall Street Journal as the base rate on corporate
loans posted by at least 75% of the nations
30 largest banks and (b) the federal funds
effective rate in effect on such day plus
1/2
of 1%. |
|
|
|
Eurodollar loans. Interest will be determined for periods
to be selected by NRG, or interest periods, of seven
days, one, two, three or six months and, to the extent available
to all of the lenders, nine or twelve months, and is expected be
at a spread (the Applicable Margin) over the
Adjusted LIBO Rate for term loans and for revolving loans and
swing-line loans, calculated on a 360-day basis. The
Adjusted LIBO Rate shall mean, with respect to any
Eurodollar loan for any interest period and as determined from
time to time, an interest rate per annum equal to the product of
(a) the rate per annum determined by the Administrative
Agent at approximately 11:00 a.m., London time, on the date
that is two business days prior to the commencement of the
relevant interest period by reference to the British
Bankers Association Interest Settlement Rates for deposits
in dollars (as set forth by the Bloomberg Information Service or
any successor thereto or any other service selected by the
Administrative Agent which has been nominated by the British
Bankers Association as an authorized information vendor
for the purpose of displaying such rates) for a period equal to
the relevant interest period and (b) certain statutory reserves
as agreed upon in the senior secured credit facility. |
The Applicable Margin shall mean, for any day, for
each type of loan, the rate per annum set forth under the
relevant column heading below based upon the consolidated senior
leverage ratio of NRG as of the relevant date of determination:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Senior |
|
Eurodollar Term | |
|
|
|
Eurodollar | |
|
ABR Revolving Loans | |
Leverage Ratio |
|
Loans | |
|
ABR Term Loans | |
|
Revolving Loans | |
|
and Swingline Loans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Category 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 3.50 to 1.00
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
Category 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 3.00 to 1.00 but less than or equal to 3.50 to
|
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
Category 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than or equal to 3.00 to 1.00
|
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
Interest on the loans will be payable (a) with respect to
any Alternate Base Rate Loan (other than a Swingline Loan), on
the last business day of each March, June, September and
December (beginning with March 31, 2006), (b) with
respect to any Eurodollar Loan, the last day of the interest
period applicable to such loan is a part and, in the case of a
Eurodollar Loan with an interest period of more than three
months duration, each day that would have been an interest
payment date had successive interest periods of three
months duration been applicable to such loan, and
(c) with respect to any swingline loan, the day that such
loan is required to be repaid. Until NRG delivers certain
financial statements and certificates for the period ended on
the first fiscal quarter after the closing date of the senior
secured credit agreement, category 1 will apply for
purposes of determining the Applicable Margin.
The synthetic letters of credit will be issued by an issuing
bank. The synthetic letter of credit issuing bank will invest
amounts in a synthetic L/ C account in certain
agreed upon permitted investments. On the last
S-109
business day of March, June, September and December of each year
(beginning with March 31, 2006): (i) the synthetic
letter of credit issuing bank will distribute to each lender
under the synthetic letter of credit facility its pro rata share
of any interest accrued on funds held in the synthetic L/C
Account and (ii) NRG will pay to the synthetic letter of
credit issuing bank for pro rata remittance to each lender under
the synthetic letter of credit facility a fee based on such
lenders total commitment (without regard to actual amount
of letters of credit outstanding) times the interest rate
applicable to the loans under the term facility (assuming
one-month LIBOR) as specified in above (net of the amounts
received by such lender pursuant to clause (i) above). In
addition, NRG will pay the synthetic letter of credit issuing
bank a fronting fee in an amount to be agreed and customary
issuance and administrative fees.
|
|
|
Default Interest and Fees |
If NRG defaults on the payment of the principal of or interest
on any loan or any other amount becoming due and payable
hereunder or under any other loan document related to the senior
secured credit facility, then NRG shall on demand from time to
time pay interest, to the extent permitted by law, on such
defaulted amount (a) in the case of overdue principal, at
the rate otherwise applicable to such loan plus 2.00% per annum
and (b) in all other cases, at a rate per annum equal to
the rate that would be applicable to an Alternate Base Rate term
loan plus 2.00%.
|
|
|
Commitment and Letter of Credit Fees |
Commitment fees equal to 0.5% per annum times the daily average
undrawn portion of the revolving facility will accrue from the
closing date and shall be payable quarterly in arrears.
A fee equal to (i) the Applicable Margin then in effect for
loans bearing interest at the Adjusted LIBO Rate made under the
revolving facility, times (ii) the average daily maximum
aggregate amount available to be drawn under all letters of
credit, will be payable quarterly in arrears to the lenders
under the revolving facility. In addition, a fronting fee, to be
agreed upon between the issuer of each letter of credit and NRG,
will be payable to such issuer, as well as certain customary
fees.
The senior secured credit facility will contain affirmative and
negative covenants customary for a transaction of this type
which, among other things, require us to meet certain financial
tests, including a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum
leverage ratio, each at the NRG level and on a consolidated
basis. The senior secured credit facility will also contain
covenants which, among other things, limit:
|
|
|
|
|
indebtedness (including guarantees and other contingent
obligations); |
|
|
|
liens; |
|
|
|
sale and lease-back transactions; |
|
|
|
investments, loans and advances; |
|
|
|
mergers, acquisitions, consolidations and asset sales; |
|
|
|
dividends and other restricted payments; |
|
|
|
transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
business activities and hedging agreements; |
|
|
|
limitations on debt payments; |
|
|
|
capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
changes to the terms of any material indebtedness that
materially increase the obligations of the obligor or confer
additional material rights to the holder of such indebtedness;
and |
|
|
|
other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. |
S-110
Events of default under the senior secured credit facility
include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
breaches of representations and warranties; |
|
|
|
payment defaults; |
|
|
|
noncompliance with covenants; |
|
|
|
bankruptcy; |
|
|
|
judgments in excess of a specified amount; |
|
|
|
any confirmation order that is reversed, amended or modified in
any material respects, vacated or stayed; |
|
|
|
any event that could result in our liability under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 in excess of a specified
amount; |
|
|
|
failure of any guarantee or pledge agreement supporting the
senior secured credit facility to be in full force and effect; |
|
|
|
failure of any lien created in favor of the loan parties to be a
valid, perfected and first priority lien on any material
collateral securing the senior secured credit facility; and |
|
|
|
a change of control, as such term is defined in the senior
secured credit facility. |
Bridge Loan Facility
NRG has entered into the commitment letter with the bridge
lenders pursuant to which the bridge lenders have committed to
provide NRG with up to $5.1 billion in bridge financing to
fund all necessary amounts not provided for under the new senior
secured credit facility. NRG does not intend to draw down on the
bridge loan facility unless this offering, the common stock
offering and/or the mandatory convertible preferred stock
offering are not consummated at the time of the closing of the
Acquisition.
The bridge loans will mature one year from the date they are
issued. Upon the maturity date, if any bridge loan has not been
repaid in full, and provided no payment or bankruptcy default
has occurred under the bridge loans or the new senior secured
credit facility, the bridge loan will automatically be converted
into a term loan due on the 10-year anniversary of the closing
date of the Acquisition. Subject to certain exceptions, the net
proceeds from (i) any public offering or private placement
of securities of NRG or its subsidiaries, (ii) any future
bank borrowings under the new senior secured credit facility or
(iii) any future asset sale will be used to repay the
bridge loans at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount
plus accrued and unpaid interest. The bridge loans may be
prepaid at any time at the option of NRG at a price equal to
100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Subject to customary exceptions, the bridge loans will be
guaranteed on a senior first priority basis by each of
NRGs current and future domestic subsidiaries, excluding
certain foreign, project and immaterial subsidiaries. The bridge
loans will initially bear interest at a per annum rate equal to
(a) at NRGs option (i) the reserve adjusted
Eurodollar rate or (ii) the base rate, as in effect from
time to time, in each case, calculated on the basis of the
actual number of days elapsed in a year of 360 days
(365/366 day year with respect to loans bearing interest
with reference to the base rate), plus (b) a spread of 500
basis points in the case NRG elects the Eurodollar option and
400 basis points in the case NRG elects the base rate option. If
the bridge loans are not repaid in whole within six months
following the closing date of the Acquisition, the spread will
increase by 100 basis points at the end of such six-month
period and will increase by an additional 50 basis points
at the end of each three-month period thereafter.
The bridge loans will contain customary events of default and
covenants by NRG. Certain terms of the bridge loan facility may
vary after the date of this prospectus supplement to facilitate
the syndication of the facility. The commitment letter is
subject to customary conditions to consummation, including the
absence of any event or circumstance that would have a material
adverse effect on the business, assets, properties,
S-111
liabilities, condition (financial or otherwise) or results of
operations, taken as a whole, of Texas Genco, or Texas Genco and
NRG combined, since June 30, 2005.
Xcel Note
On December 5, 2003, we entered into a $10.0 million
promissory note with Xcel Energy. The note accrues interest at a
rate of 3% per year, payable quarterly in arrears. All principal
is due at maturity on June 5, 2006.
New Senior Notes
Concurrently with this offering, NRG intends to offer an
aggregate principal amount of $3.6 billion of New Senior
Notes which will consist of 7.250% senior notes due 2014,
and 7.375% senior notes due 2016. The net proceeds of the
New Senior Notes offering (after payment of underwriting
discounts and commissions) will be placed into an escrow account
held by the trustee of the New Senior Notes, as escrow agent,
until the consummation of the Acquisition. The New Senior Notes
will be general unsecured obligations of NRG guaranteed jointly
and severally by each of NRGs current and future
restricted subsidiaries, excluding certain foreign, project and
immaterial subsidiaries.
The New Senior Notes will rank pari passu in right of
payment with all existing and future unsecured senior
indebtedness of NRG and senior in right of payment to any future
subordinated indebtedness of NRG. Because the New Senior Notes
will be guaranteed by only certain of NRGs subsidiaries,
they will be structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and
other liabilities, including trade payables, of those
subsidiaries that do not guarantee the New Senior Notes.
Interest on the 2014 fixed rate notes and 2016 fixed rate notes
will be payable semi-annually in arrears. NRG may redeem some or
all of the 2014 fixed rate notes at any time prior to
February 1, 2010 at a price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the notes redeemed plus a make-whole
premium and accrued and unpaid interest. NRG may redeem some or
all of the 2016 fixed rate notes at any time prior to
February 1, 2011 at a price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the notes redeemed plus a make-whole
premium and accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to
February 1, 2009, NRG may redeem up to 35% of the 2014
fixed rate notes issued under the applicable indenture with the
net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings, provided at least
65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2014 fixed rate
notes issued in the concurrent offering of 2014 fixed rate notes
remains outstanding after the redemption. Prior to
February 1, 2009, NRG may redeem up to 35% of the 2016
fixed rate notes issued under the applicable indenture with the
net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings, provided at least
65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2016 fixed rate
notes issued in the concurrent offering of 2016 fixed rate notes
remains outstanding after the redemption. On or after
February 1, 2010, NRG can redeem some or all of the 2014
fixed rate notes at specified redemption prices plus accrued
interest. On or after February 1, 2011, NRG can redeem some
or all of the 2016 fixed rate notes at specified redemption
prices plus accrued interest. Upon the occurrence of a change of
control, holders of the New Senior Notes will have the right,
subject to certain conditions, to require NRG to repurchase
their notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount
plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. The
New Senior Notes are also subject to a special mandatory
redemption, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the aggregate
principal amount of the New Senior Notes plus accrued interest
to, but not including, the redemption date if the Acquisition is
not consummated by September 30, 2006.
The indenture governing the New Senior Notes contains covenants,
which, among other things, limit NRGs ability and the
ability of NRGs restricted subsidiaries to: (i) incur
additional debt; (ii) declare or pay dividends, redeem
stock or make other distributions to stockholders;
(iii) create liens; (iv) make certain restricted
investments; (v) enter into transactions with affiliates;
(vi) sell or transfer assets; and (vii) consolidate or
merge.
Events of default under the indenture governing the New Senior
Notes include, among other things, non-payment of interest of
principal, bankruptcy, non-compliance with covenants, failure by
NRG to comply with any material term of the escrow agreement or
security agreement, failure of a subsidiary guarantee, escrow
S-112
agreement, security agreement or lien to be held enforceable in
a court of law or denial of obligations under a guarantee by a
significant subsidiary, cross defaults on other indebtedness in
the aggregate of $100 million or more and judgments for the
payment of money in the aggregate of more than $100 million
rendered against NRG, any restricted subsidiary or a combination
thereof.
Credit Support and Collateral Arrangements
In connection with our power generation business, we manage the
commodity price risk associated with our supply activities and
our electric generation facilities. This includes forward power
sales, fuel and energy purchases and emission credits. In order
to manage these risks, we enter into financial instruments to
hedge the variability in future cash flows form forecasted sales
of electricity and purchases of fuel and energy. We utilize a
variety of instruments including forward contracts, futures
contracts, swaps and options. Certain of these contracts allow
counterparties to require the combined company to provide credit
support. This credit support consists of letters of credit,
cash, guarantees and junior liens on the ERCOT assets. As of
September, 30, 2005, the combined company balances of the credit
support provided in support of these contracts were
$846 million for letters of credit, $631.4 million for
cash margin, $152.4 million for parental guarantees and
$2,181 million for junior liens on the assets in the ERCOT
market.
The following table shows the breakdown of the combined, after
giving effect to the Acquisition and Financing Transactions,
company balances of the credit support provided in support of
the hedging contracts described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of
Credit(1)
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
|
$ |
831 |
|
Cash
Margin(1)
|
|
|
631.4 |
|
|
|
432.5 |
|
Parental
Guarantees(2)
|
|
|
142.1 |
|
|
|
167.1 |
|
Junior Liens on ERCOT Assets
|
|
|
2,181 |
|
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
|
(1) |
At December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2005, West
Coast Powers collateral posted totaled $48.4 million
and $24.6 million, respectively and is not included in the
table above. Of these amounts, letters of credit totaled $0 and
$10.7 million, respectively and cash totaled
$48.4 million and $13.9 million, respectively. |
|
(2) |
Parental guarantees were provided by either NRG Energy, Inc. or
Texas Genco LLC on behalf of their subsidiaries. |
NRG expects that, at the closing of the Acquisition and the
Financing Transactions, the collateral arrangements described
above, including their respect to certain counterparties holding
junior liens on the ERCOT assets, will remain in place or will
be replaced with substitute collateral arrangements comprising
an interest in a second lien position on substantially all of
the NRGs assets. On a going forward basis, NRG intends to
secure some or all of its commodity hedging activities with
interests in a second lien position on substantially all of
NRGs assets. There can be no assurance that this second
lien position will provide enough capacity to cover all
commodity hedges that are necessary or desirable for adequately
hedging NRGs commodity risk. See Risk
FactorsRisks Related to the Operation of our
BusinessWe may not have sufficient liquidity to hedge
market risks effectively.
S-113
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS
FOR NON-U.S. HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK
The following is a general discussion of the material U.S.
federal income and estate tax considerations applicable to
non-U.S. holders with respect to their ownership and disposition
of shares of our common stock. This discussion is for general
information only and is not tax advice. Accordingly, all
prospective non-U.S. holders of our common stock should consult
their own tax advisors with respect to the U.S. federal, state,
local and non-U.S. tax consequences of the acquisition,
ownership and disposition of our common stock. A non-U.S.
holder means a beneficial owner of our common stock who is
not for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States, |
|
|
|
a corporation, partnership, or any other organization taxable
for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a corporation or
partnership created or organized in the United States or under
the laws of the United States, any state thereof, or the
District of Columbia, |
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is included in gross income for
U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its source, or |
|
|
|
a trust if (1) a court within the United States is able to
exercise primary supervision over the administration of the
trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control
all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) a valid
election is in place to treat the trust as a U.S. person. |
This discussion is based on current provisions of the United
States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, existing and
proposed United States Treasury Regulations promulgated
thereunder, current administrative rulings and judicial
decisions, all of which are in effect as of the date of this
prospectus and all of which are subject to change or to
differing interpretation. Any change, which may or may not be
retroactive, could alter the tax consequences to non-U.S.
holders described in this prospectus. We assume in this
discussion that a non-U.S. holder holds shares of our common
stock as a capital asset (generally property held for
investment).
This discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal
income and estate taxation that may be relevant to a particular
non-U.S. holder in light of that non-U.S. holders
individual circumstances nor does it address any aspects of U.S.
state, local or non-U.S. taxes. This discussion also does not
consider any specific facts or circumstances that may apply to a
non-U.S. holder and does not address the special tax rules
applicable to particular non-U.S. holders, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
banks, insurance companies, or other financial institutions; |
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations; |
|
|
|
controlled foreign corporations or passive foreign investment
companies; |
|
|
|
brokers or dealers in securities or currencies; |
|
|
|
pass-through entities (e.g. partnerships) or persons who hold
our common stock through pass-through entities; |
|
|
|
regulated investment companies; |
|
|
|
pension plans; |
|
|
|
owners of more than 5% of our common stock; |
|
|
|
persons that hold our common stock as part of a straddle, hedge,
conversion transaction, synthetic security or other integrated
investment; and |
|
|
|
certain U.S. expatriates. |
In addition, if a partnership holds our common stock, the tax
treatment of a partner generally will depend on the status of
the partner and upon the activities of the partnership.
Accordingly, partnerships that are prospective investors in our
common stock, and partners in such partnerships, should consult
their tax advisors.
S-114
There can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service, or
the IRS, will not challenge one of the tax consequences
described herein, and we have not obtained, nor do we intend to
obtain, an opinion of counsel with respect to the U.S. federal
income or estate tax consequences to a non-U.S. holder of the
purchase, ownership, or disposition of our common stock. We urge
prospective investors to consult with their own tax advisors
regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. income and
other tax considerations of acquiring, holding and disposing of
shares of our common stock.
Distributions on Our Common Stock
NRG has not declared or paid distributions on its new common
stock, although, subject to certain restrictions, we may do so
in the future. In the event we do pay distributions on our
common stock, these distributions generally will constitute
dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent
paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as
determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. If a
distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and
profits, the excess will be treated as a tax-free return of the
non-U.S. holders investment, up to such holders tax
basis in the common stock. Any remaining excess will be treated
as capital gain, subject to the tax treatment described below in
Gain on Sale or Other Disposition of Our Common
Stock.
Dividends paid to a non-U.S. holder generally will be subject to
withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a 30% rate or such
lower rate as may be provided by an applicable income tax
treaty. If we determine, at a time reasonably close to the date
of payment of a distribution on our common stock, that the
distribution will not qualify as a dividend because we do not
anticipate having current or accumulated earnings and profits,
we intend not to withhold any U.S. federal income tax on the
distribution as permitted by United States Treasury Regulations.
If we or another withholding agent withholds tax on such a
distribution, a non-U.S. holder may be entitled to a refund of
the tax withheld which the non-U.S. holder may claim by filing a
United States tax return with the IRS.
Dividends that are treated as effectively connected
with a trade or business conducted by a non-U.S. holder within
the United States (and, if an applicable income tax treaty so
provides, are also attributable to a permanent establishment of
such non-U.S. holder), known as United States trade or
business income, are generally exempt from the 30%
withholding tax if the non-U.S. holder satisfies applicable
certification and other requirements. However, such United
States trade or business income, net of specified deductions and
credits, is taxed at the same graduated U.S. federal income tax
rates applicable to United States persons. Any United States
trade or business income received by a non-U.S. holder that is a
corporation may also, under certain circumstances, be subject to
an additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate or
such lower rate as specified by an applicable income tax treaty.
A non-U.S. holder of our common stock who claims the benefit of
an applicable income tax treaty generally will be required to
satisfy applicable certification and other requirements.
Non-U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors
regarding their entitlement to benefits under a relevant income
tax treaty.
A non-U.S. holder that is eligible for a reduced rate of United
States withholding tax or other exclusion from withholding under
an income tax treaty may obtain a refund or credit of any excess
amounts withheld by timely filing an appropriate claim with the
IRS.
Gain on Sale or Other Disposition of Our Common Stock
In general, a non-U.S. holder will not be subject to any U.S.
federal income tax or withholding tax on any gain realized upon
such holders sale or other disposition of shares of our
common stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is United States trade or business income, in which
case such holder (i) will be subject to tax on the net gain
derived from the sale or disposition under the graduated United
States federal income tax rates applicable to United States
persons and (ii) if a corporation, may be subject to the
branch profits tax, both as described above in
Distributions on Our Common Stock; |
|
|
|
the non-U.S. holder is an individual who is present in the
United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of
the disposition and meets certain other requirements in which
case the holder will be |
S-115
|
|
|
|
|
subject to a flat 30% tax on the amount by which the gain
derived from the sale, and certain other United States source
capital gains realized during such year exceed certain United
States source capital losses realized during such year; or |
|
|
|
certain rules (described below) relating to United States
real property holding corporation status apply to such
sale or other disposition. |
Gain recognized on a sale or other disposition of our common
stock may be subject to U.S. federal income tax (and, in certain
circumstances, to withholding tax) if (1) our common stock
has ceased to be traded on an established securities market
prior to the beginning of the calendar year in which the sale or
disposition occurs and (2) we are, or have been, a United
States real property holding corporation during the shorter of
the five-year period ending on the date of such sale or other
disposition or the period that the non-U.S. holder held our
common stock. Generally, a corporation is a United States real
property holding corporation if the fair market value of its
United States real property interests equals or
exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide
real property interests plus its other assets used or held for
use in a trade or business. Although there can be no assurance,
we do not believe that we are, or have been, a United States
real property holding corporation, or that we are likely to
become one in the future.
United States Federal Estate Tax
Shares of our common stock that are owned or treated as owned by
an individual non-U.S. holder at the time of death will be
included in the individuals gross estate for U.S. federal
estate tax purposes, unless an applicable estate tax or other
treaty provides otherwise, and therefore may be subject to U.S.
federal estate tax.
Backup Withholding, Information Reporting and Other Reporting
Requirements
We must report to the IRS and to each non-U.S. holder the gross
amount of the dividends on our common stock paid to such holder
and the tax withheld, if any, with respect to such dividends.
Dividends paid to non-U.S. holders subject to the United States
withholding tax, as described above in Distributions on
Our Common Stock, generally will be exempt from United
States backup withholding.
Information reporting and backup withholding (currently at a
rate of 28%) will generally apply to the proceeds of a
disposition of our common stock by a non-U.S. holder effected by
or through the United States office of a broker unless the
holder certifies its status as a non-U.S. holder and satisfies
certain other qualifications, or otherwise establishes an
exemption. Generally, information reporting and backup
withholding will not apply to a payment of disposition proceeds
where the transaction is effected outside the United States
through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker. However, for
information reporting purposes, certain brokers with substantial
United States ownership or operations generally will be treated
in a manner similar to United States brokers. Non-U.S. holders
should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application
of the information reporting and backup withholding rules to
them.
Copies of information returns may be made available under the
provisions of a specific treaty or agreement to the tax
authorities of the country in which the non-U.S. holder resides
or is incorporated.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a
non-U.S. holder can be refunded or credited against the non-U.S.
holders U.S. federal income tax liability, if any,
provided that an appropriate claim is timely filed with the IRS.
S-116
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement dated as of the date of this prospectus
supplement, the underwriters named below have severally agreed
to purchase and we have agreed to sell to them, severally, the
respective number of shares of common stock set forth opposite
their names below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number | |
Underwriter |
|
of Shares | |
|
|
| |
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
7,768,508 |
|
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
|
7,768,508 |
|
Lehman Brothers Inc.
|
|
|
1,564,129 |
|
Banc of America Securities LLC
|
|
|
938,478 |
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
|
938,478 |
|
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
|
|
938,478 |
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated |
|
|
938,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
20,855,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriters are offering the shares of common stock subject
to their acceptance of the shares from us and subject to prior
sale. The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations
of the several underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of
the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus supplement
and the accompanying prospectus are subject to the approval of
legal matters by their counsel and to other conditions. The
underwriters are obligated to take and pay for all of the shares
of common stock offered by this prospectus supplement if any
such shares are taken. However, the underwriters are not
required to take or pay for the shares covered by the
underwriters overallotment described below unless and
until the overallotment is exercised.
The underwriters initially propose to offer part of the shares
of common stock directly to the public at the public offering
price listed on the cover page of this prospectus supplement and
part to certain dealers at a price that represents a concession
not in excess of $0.88 per share less than the public
offering price. After the initial offering of the shares of
common stock, the offering price and other selling terms may
from time to time be varied by the underwriters. The total price
to the public will be $1,016,684,029, the total underwriting
discount will be $30,500,521 and the total net proceeds to us
will be $985,083,508.
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for
30 days from the date of this prospectus supplement, to
purchase up to 3,128,259 additional shares of common stock at
the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus supplement, less the underwriting discount. The
underwriters may exercise this option solely for the purpose of
covering overallotments, if any, made in connection with the
offering of the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus supplement. To the extent that the option is
exercised, each underwriter will become obligated, subject to
certain conditions, to purchase about the same percentage of the
additional shares of our common stock as the number listed
opposite the underwriters name in the preceding table
bears to the total number of shares of our common stock listed
opposite the names of all underwriters in the preceding table.
If the overallotment option is exercised in full, the total
price to the public would be $152,502,626, the total
underwriting discount would be $4,575,079 and the total proceeds
to us would be $147,927,547.
The estimated offering expenses payable by us are approximately
$1,100,000, not including the underwriting discount, which
includes legal, accounting and printing costs and various other
fees associated with registering and listing the common stock.
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol NRG.
S-117
We and each of our executive officers and directors have agreed,
with exceptions, not to sell or transfer any common stock for
90 days after the date of this prospectus supplement
without first obtaining the written consent of Morgan Stanley
& Co. Incorporated and Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
Specifically, we and these other individuals and entities have
agreed not to directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or
contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell,
grant any option, right or warrant for the sale of, or otherwise
dispose of or transfer any shares of common stock or any
securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for
common stock or file any registration statement with respect to
any of the foregoing; or |
|
|
|
enter into any swap or any other agreement or any transaction
that transfers, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, the
economic consequence of ownership of the common stock, whether
any such swap or transaction described above is to be settled by
delivery of common stock or such other securities, in cash or
otherwise. |
This lockup provision applies to common stock and to securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for common stock
owned now or acquired later by the person executing the
agreement or for which the person executing the agreement later
acquires the power of disposition.
In order to facilitate the offering of the common stock, the
underwriters may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain
or otherwise affect the price of the common stock. Specifically,
the underwriters may sell more shares than they are obligated to
purchase under the underwriting agreement, creating a short
position. A short sale is covered if the short position is no
greater than the number of shares available for purchase by the
underwriters under the overallotment option. The underwriters
can close out a covered short sale by exercising the
overallotment option or purchasing shares in the open market. In
determining the source of shares to close out a covered short
sale, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the
open market price of shares compared to the price available
under the overallotment option. The underwriters may also sell
shares in excess of the overallotment option, creating a naked
short position. The underwriters must close out any naked short
position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short
position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are
concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of
the common stock in the open market after pricing this offering
that could adversely affect investors who purchase shares in
this offering. In addition, in order to cover any overallotments
or to stabilize the price of our common stock, the underwriters
may bid for, and purchase, shares of our common stock in the
open market. Finally, the underwriting syndicate may reclaim
selling concessions allowed to an underwriter or a dealer for
distributing our common stock in this offering, if the syndicate
repurchases previously distributed shares of our common stock to
cover syndicate short positions, in stabilization transactions
or otherwise. Any of these activities may raise or maintain the
market price of the common stock above independent market levels
or prevent or retard a decline in the market price of the common
stock. The underwriters are not required to engage in these
activities, and may end any of these activities at any time.
This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus in
electronic format may be made available on a website maintained
by one or more of the representatives of the underwriters and
may also be made available on a website maintained by the other
underwriters. The underwriters may agree to allocate a number of
shares to underwriters for sale to their online brokerage
account holders. Internet distributions will be allocated by the
representatives of the underwriters to underwriters that may
make Internet distributions on the same basis as other
allocations.
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc., Lehman Brothers Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC,
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner
& Smith Incorporated and Goldman Sachs & Co. and certain
of their affiliates are lenders under, and receive customary
fees and expenses in connection with, certain of our credit
facilities, including the new senior secured credit facility and
the bridge loan facility. See Description of Certain
Indebtedness. We have also entered into the J. Aron PPA
and other agreements with J. Aron, an affiliate of Goldman,
Sachs & Co., as well as hedging agreements with Deutsche
Bank Securities Inc. and/or its affiliates and certain other
lenders under our new senior secured credit facility. See
Business Regional Business Descriptions Texas
(ERCOT) J. Aron Power Purchase Agreement.
S-118
In addition, the underwriters and their affiliates have, from
time to time, performed, and may in the future perform, various
financial advisory, commercial banking or investment banking
services for us, our subsidiaries or our affiliates for which
they received or will receive customary fees and expenses.
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or to contribute to payments the underwriters
may be required to make in respect of those liabilities.
S-119
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the common stock offered hereby and certain
other matters will be passed upon for NRG by Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, New York. The
underwriters have been represented in connection with this
offering by Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, New York.
S-120
NRG Energy, Inc.
Debt Securities
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
NRG Energy, Inc., from time to time, may offer to sell senior or
subordinated debt securities, preferred stock and common stock.
The debt securities and preferred stock may be convertible into
or exercisable or exchangeable for our common stock, our
preferred stock, our other securities or the debt or equity
securities of one or more other entities. Our common stock is
listed on the New York Stock Exchange and trades under the
ticker symbol NRG.
We may offer and sell these securities to or through one or more
underwriters, dealers and agents, or directly to purchasers, on
a continuous or delayed basis.
This prospectus describes some of the general terms that may
apply to these securities. The specific terms of any securities
to be offered will be described in a supplement to this
prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other
state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
Prospectus dated December 21, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
|
|
iii |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Where You Can Find More
Information
We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements
and other information with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or the SEC. You can inspect and copy these reports,
proxy statements and other information at the Public Reference
Room of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549. You can obtain copies of these materials from the Public
Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. Please call
the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information on the operation of the public reference
room. NRGs SEC filings will also be available to you on
the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov and through the New
York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York,
New York 10005, on which our common stock is listed.
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-3 relating
to the securities covered by this prospectus. This prospectus,
which forms a part of the registration statement, does not
contain all the information that is included in the registration
statement. You will find additional information about us in the
registration statement. Any statements made in this prospectus
concerning the provisions of legal documents are not necessarily
complete and you should read the documents that are filed as
exhibits to the registration statement or otherwise filed with
the SEC for a more complete understanding of the document or
matter.
Incorporation Of
Certain Information By Reference
The SEC allows the incorporation by reference of the
information filed by us with the SEC into this prospectus, which
means that important information can be disclosed to you by
referring you to those documents and those documents will be
considered part of this prospectus. Information that we file
later with the SEC will automatically update and supersede the
previously filed information. The documents listed below and any
future filings we make with the SEC under Sections 13(a),
13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act) are incorporated by
reference herein:
|
|
|
1. Our annual report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004 filed on March 30, 2005. |
|
|
2. Our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
filed on April 12, 2005. |
|
|
3. Our quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q for the
quarters ended March 31, 2005 filed on May 10, 2005,
June 30, 2005 filed on August 9, 2005 and
September 30, 2005 filed on November 7, 2005. |
|
|
4. Our current reports on
Form 8-K filed on
February 24, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on
March 3, 2005, two
Forms 8-K filed on
March 30, 2005 (which do not include information deemed
furnished for purposes of Regulation F-D),
Form 8-K filed on
May 24, 2005,
Form 8-K/ A filed
on May 24, 2005,
Form 8-K/ A filed
on May 25, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on
June 15, 2005,
Form 8-K/ A filed
on June 15, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on
June 17, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on
July 18, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on
August 1, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on
August 3, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on
August 9, 2005 (which does not include information deemed
furnished for purposes of Regulation F-D),
Form 8-K filed on
August 11, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on
September 1, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on
September 7, 2005 (which does not include information
deemed furnished for purposes of
Regulation F-D),
Form 8-K filed on
October 3, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on
October 12, 2005,
Form 8-K filed on
November 7, 2005 (which does not include information deemed
furnished for purposes of Regulation F-D),
Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2005 and
Form 8-K filed on
December 21, 2005. |
|
|
5. The description of our common stock contained in the
Registration Statement on
Form 8-A dated
March 22, 2004 filed with the SEC to register such
securities under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, including any amendment or report filed for the purpose
of updating such description. |
ii
If you make a request for such information in writing or by
telephone, we will provide you, without charge, a copy of any or
all of the information incorporated by reference into this
prospectus. Any such request should be directed to:
NRG Energy, Inc.
211 Carnegie Center
Princeton, NJ 08540
(609) 524-4500
Attention: General Counsel
You should rely only on the information contained in, or
incorporated by reference in, this prospectus. We have not
authorized anyone else to provide you with different or
additional information. This prospectus does not offer to sell
or solicit any offer to buy any notes in any jurisdiction where
the offer or sale is unlawful. You should not assume that the
information in this prospectus or in any document incorporated
by reference is accurate as of any date other than the date on
the front cover of the applicable document.
Disclosure Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements
This prospectus, any accompanying prospectus supplement and the
documents incorporated by reference herein and therein may
contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such
forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that include, but are not limited
to, expected earnings and cash flows, future growth and
financial performance and the expected synergies and other
benefits of the acquisition of Texas Genco LLC described herein
(including the documents incorporated herein by reference), and
typically can be identified by the use of words such as
will, expect, estimate,
anticipate, forecast, plan,
believe and similar terms. Although we believe that
our expectations are reasonable, we can give no assurance that
these expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual
results may vary materially. Factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those contemplated above
include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
Risks and uncertainties related to the capital markets
generally, including increases in interest rates and the
availability of financing for the acquisition of Texas Genco LLC; |
|
|
|
NRGs indebtedness and the additional indebtedness that it
will incur in connection with the acquisition of Texas Genco LLC; |
|
|
|
NRGs ability to successfully complete the acquisition of
Texas Genco LLC, regulatory or other limitations that may be
imposed as a result of the acquisition of Texas Genco LLC, and
the success of the business following the acquisition of Texas
Genco LLC; |
|
|
|
General economic conditions, changes in the wholesale power
markets and fluctuations in the cost of fuel or other raw
materials; |
|
|
|
Hazards customary to the power production industry and power
generation operations such as fuel and electricity price
volatility, unusual weather conditions, catastrophic
weather-related or other damage to facilities, unscheduled
generation outages, maintenance or repairs, unanticipated
changes to fossil fuel supply costs or availability due to
higher demand, shortages, transportation problems or other
developments, environmental incidents, or electric transmission
or gas pipeline system constraints and the possibility that we
may not have adequate insurance to cover losses as a result of
such hazards; |
|
|
|
NRGs potential inability to enter into contracts to sell
power and procure fuel on terms and prices acceptable to it; |
|
|
|
The liquidity and competitiveness of wholesale markets for
energy commodities; |
|
|
|
Changes in government regulation, including possible changes of
market rules, market structures and design, rates, tariffs,
environmental laws and regulations and regulatory compliance
requirements; |
iii
|
|
|
|
|
Price mitigation strategies and other market structures or
designs employed by independent system operators, or ISOs, or
regional transmission organizations, or RTOs, that result in a
failure to adequately compensate our generation units for all of
their costs; |
|
|
|
NRGs ability to realize its significant deferred tax
assets, including loss carry forwards; |
|
|
|
The effectiveness of NRGs risk management policies and
procedures and the ability of NRGs counterparties to
satisfy their financial commitments; |
|
|
|
Counterparties collateral demands and other factors
affecting NRGs liquidity position and financial condition; |
|
|
|
NRGs ability to operate its businesses efficiently, manage
capital expenditures and costs (including general and
administrative expenses) tightly and generate earnings and cash
flow from its asset-based businesses in relation to its debt and
other obligations; and |
|
|
|
Significant operating and financial restrictions placed on NRG
contained in the indenture governing its 8% second priority
senior secured notes due 2013, its amended and restated credit
facility as well as in debt and other agreements of certain of
NRGs subsidiaries and project affiliates generally. |
iv
NRG Energy,
Inc.
NRG Energy is a wholesale power generation company, primarily
engaged in the ownership and operation of power generation
facilities, the transacting in and trading of fuel and
transportation services and the marketing and trading of energy,
capacity and related products in the United States and
internationally. We have a diverse portfolio of electric
generation facilities in terms of geography, fuel type and
dispatch levels. Our principal domestic generation assets
(without giving effect to the acquisition of Texas Genco LLC)
consist of a diversified mix of natural gas-, coal- and
oil-fired facilities, representing approximately 40%, 30% and
30% of our total domestic generation capacity, respectively. In
addition (without giving effect to the acquisition of Texas
Genco LLC), approximately 15% of our domestic generating
facilities have dual-or multiple-fuel capacity, which render the
ability for plants to dispatch with the lowest cost fuel option.
Our two principal operating objectives are to optimize
performance of our entire portfolio, and to protect and enhance
the market value of our physical and contractual assets through
the execution of risk management, marketing and trading
strategies within well-defined risk and liquidity guidelines. We
manage the assets in our core regions on a portfolio basis as
integrated businesses in order to maximize profits and minimize
risk. Our business involves the reinvestment of capital in our
existing assets for reasons of repowering, expansion, pollution
control, operating efficiency, reliability programs, greater
fuel optionality, greater merit order diversity, and enhanced
portfolio effect, among other reasons. Our business also may
involve acquisitions intended to complement the asset portfolios
in our core regions. From time to time we may also consider and
undertake other merger and acquisition transactions that are
consistent with our strategy, such as our pending acquisition of
Texas Genco LLC.
On September 30, 2005, we entered into an acquisition
agreement, or the Acquisition Agreement, with Texas Genco LLC
and each of the direct and indirect owners of equity interests
in Texas Genco LLC, or the Sellers. Pursuant to the Acquisition
Agreement, we agreed to purchase all of the outstanding equity
interests in Texas Genco LLC for a total purchase price of
approximately $5.825 billion and the assumption by us of
approximately $2.5 billion of indebtedness. The purchase
price is subject to adjustment, and includes an equity component
valued at $1.8 billion based on a price per share of $40.50
of NRGs common stock. As a result of the Acquisition,
Texas Genco LLC will become a wholly owned subsidiary of NRG and
will nearly double our U.S. generation portfolio from
approximately 12,005 Megawatts to 23,124 Megawatts.
We were incorporated as a Delaware corporation on May 29,
1992. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol NRG. Our headquarters and principal
executive offices are located at 211 Carnegie Center, Princeton,
New Jersey 08540. Our telephone number is
(609) 524-4500.
You can get more information regarding our business by reading
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, and the other reports
we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See
Where You Can Find More Information.
1
Description Of
Securities We May Offer
Debt Securities And
Guarantees
We may offer secured or unsecured debt securities, which may be
convertible. Our debt securities and any related guarantees will
be issued under an indenture to be entered into between us and
Law Debenture Trust Company of New York. Holders of our
indebtedness will be structurally subordinated to holders of any
indebtedness (including trade payables) of any of our
subsidiaries that do not guarantee our payment obligations under
such indebtedness.
We have summarized certain general features of the debt
securities from the indenture. A form of indenture is attached
as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part. The following description of the terms
of the debt securities and the guarantees sets forth certain
general terms and provisions. The particular terms of the debt
securities and guarantees offered by any prospectus supplement
and the extent, if any, to which such general provisions may
apply to the debt securities and guarantees will be described in
the related prospectus supplement. Accordingly, for a
description of the terms of a particular issue of debt
securities, reference must be made to both the related
prospectus supplement and to the following description.
General
The aggregate principal amount of debt securities that may be
issued under the indenture is unlimited. The debt securities may
be issued in one or more series as may be authorized from time
to time.
Reference is made to the applicable prospectus supplement for
the following terms of the debt securities (if applicable):
|
|
|
|
|
title and aggregate principal amount; |
|
|
|
whether the securities will be senior or subordinated; |
|
|
|
applicable subordination provisions, if any; |
|
|
|
whether securities issued by us will be entitled to the benefits
of the guarantees or any other form of guarantee; |
|
|
|
conversion or exchange into other securities; |
|
|
|
whether securities issued by us will be secured or unsecured,
and if secured, what the collateral will consist of; |
|
|
|
percentage or percentages of principal amount at which such
securities will be issued; |
|
|
|
maturity date(s); |
|
|
|
interest rate(s) or the method for determining the interest
rate(s); |
|
|
|
dates on which interest will accrue or the method for
determining dates on which interest will accrue and dates on
which interest will be payable; |
|
|
|
redemption (including upon a change of control) or
early repayment provisions; |
|
|
|
authorized denominations; |
|
|
|
form; |
|
|
|
amount of discount or premium, if any, with which such
securities will be issued; |
|
|
|
whether such securities will be issued in whole or in part in
the form of one or more global securities; |
|
|
|
identity of the depositary for global securities; |
2
|
|
|
|
|
whether a temporary security is to be issued with respect to
such series and whether any interest payable prior to the
issuance of definitive securities of the series will be credited
to the account of the persons entitled thereto; |
|
|
|
the terms upon which beneficial interests in a temporary global
security may be exchanged in whole or in part for beneficial
interests in a definitive global security or for individual
definitive securities; |
|
|
|
conversion or exchange features; |
|
|
|
any covenants applicable to the particular debt securities being
issued; |
|
|
|
any defaults and events of default applicable to the particular
debt securities being issued; |
|
|
|
currency, currencies or currency units in which the purchase
price for, the principal of and any premium and any interest on,
such securities will be payable; |
|
|
|
time period within which, the manner in which and the terms and
conditions upon which the purchaser of the securities can select
the payment currency; |
|
|
|
securities exchange(s) on which the securities will be listed,
if any; |
|
|
|
whether any underwriter(s) will act as market maker(s) for the
securities; |
|
|
|
extent to which a secondary market for the securities is
expected to develop; |
|
|
|
additions to or changes in the events of default with respect to
the securities and any change in the right of the trustee or the
holders to declare the principal, premium and interest with
respect to such securities to be due and payable; |
|
|
|
provisions relating to covenant defeasance and legal defeasance; |
|
|
|
provisions relating to satisfaction and discharge of the
indenture; |
|
|
|
provisions relating to the modification of the indenture both
with and without the consent of holders of debt securities
issued under the indenture; and |
|
|
|
additional terms not inconsistent with the provisions of the
indenture. |
One or more series of debt securities may be sold at a
substantial discount below their stated principal amount,
bearing no interest or interest at a rate which at the time of
issuance is below market rates. One or more series of debt
securities may be variable rate debt securities that may be
exchanged for fixed rate debt securities.
United States federal income tax consequences and special
considerations, if any, applicable to any such series will be
described in the applicable prospectus supplement.
Debt securities may be issued where the amount of principal
and/or interest payable is determined by reference to one or
more currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity indices
or other factors. Holders of such securities may receive a
principal amount or a payment of interest that is greater than
or less than the amount of principal or interest otherwise
payable on such dates, depending upon the value of the
applicable currencies, commodities, equity indices or other
factors. Information as to the methods for determining the
amount of principal or interest, if any, payable on any date,
the currencies, commodities, equity indices or other factors to
which the amount payable on such date is linked and certain
additional United States federal income tax considerations will
be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement.
The term debt securities includes debt securities
denominated in U.S. dollars or, if specified in the
applicable prospectus supplement, in any other freely
transferable currency or units based on or relating to foreign
currencies.
We expect most debt securities to be issued in fully registered
form without coupons and in denominations of $1,000 or $5,000
and any integral multiples thereof. Subject to the limitations
provided in the indenture and in the prospectus supplement, debt
securities that are issued in registered form may be
3
transferred or exchanged at the office of the trustee maintained
in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York or the
principal corporate trust office of the trustee, without the
payment of any service charge, other than any tax or other
governmental charge payable in connection therewith.
Guarantees
Any debt securities may be guaranteed by one or more of our
direct or indirect subsidiaries. Each prospectus supplement will
describe any guarantees for the benefit of the series of debt
securities to which it relates, including required financial
information of the subsidiary guarantors, as applicable.
Global Securities
The debt securities of a series may be issued in whole or in
part in the form of one or more global securities that will be
deposited with, or on behalf of, a depositary (the
depositary) identified in the prospectus supplement.
Global securities will be issued in registered form and in
either temporary or definitive form. Unless and until it is
exchanged in whole or in part for the individual debt
securities, a global security may not be transferred except as a
whole by the depositary for such global security to a nominee of
such depositary or by a nominee of such depositary to such
depositary or another nominee of such depositary or by such
depositary or any such nominee to a successor of such depositary
or a nominee of such successor. The specific terms of the
depositary arrangement with respect to any debt securities of a
series and the rights of and limitations upon owners of
beneficial interests in a global security will be described in
the applicable prospectus supplement.
Governing Law
The indenture, the debt securities and the guarantees shall be
construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the
State of New York, without giving effect to the principles
thereof relating to conflicts of law.
Preferred
Stock
The following briefly summarizes the material terms of our
preferred stock, other than pricing and related terms that will
be disclosed in an accompanying prospectus supplement. You
should read the particular terms of any series of preferred
stock offered by us, which will be described in more detail in
any prospectus supplement relating to such series, together with
the more detailed provisions of our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and the certificate of designation
relating to each particular series of preferred stock for
provisions that may be important to you. The certificate of
incorporation, as amended and restated, is incorporated by
reference into the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part. The certificate of designation relating
to the particular series of preferred stock offered by an
accompanying prospectus supplement and this prospectus will be
filed as an exhibit to a document incorporated by reference in
the registration statement. The prospectus supplement will also
state whether any of the terms summarized below do not apply to
the series of preferred stock being offered.
As of the date of this prospectus, we are authorized to issue up
to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.01 per share. As of December 16, 2005,
420,000 shares of 4% Convertible Perpetual Preferred
Stock were outstanding and 250,000 shares of
3.625% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock were
outstanding. Under our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, our board of directors is authorized to issue
shares of preferred stock in one or more series, and to
establish from time to time a series of preferred stock with the
following terms specified:
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares to be included in the series; |
|
|
|
the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of
the series; and |
|
|
|
the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such series. |
Prior to the issuance of any series of preferred stock, our
board of directors will adopt resolutions creating and
designating the series as a series of preferred stock and the
resolutions will be filed in a certificate of
4
designation as an amendment to the amended and restated
certificate of incorporation. The term board of
directors includes any duly authorized committee.
The rights of holders of the preferred stock offered may be
adversely affected by the rights of holders of any shares of
preferred stock that may be issued in the future. Our board of
directors may cause shares of preferred stock to be issued in
public or private transactions for any proper corporate purpose.
Examples of proper corporate purposes include issuances to
obtain additional financing in connection with acquisitions or
otherwise, and issuances to our or our subsidiaries
officers, directors and employees pursuant to benefit plans or
otherwise. Shares of preferred stock we issue may have the
effect of rendering more difficult or discouraging an
acquisition of us deemed undesirable by our board of directors.
The preferred stock will be, when issued, fully paid and
nonassessable. Holders of preferred stock will not have any
preemptive or subscription rights to acquire more of our stock.
The transfer agent, registrar, dividend disbursing agent and
redemption agent for shares of each series of preferred stock
will be named in the prospectus supplement relating to such
series.
Rank
Unless otherwise specified in the prospectus supplement relating
to the shares of a series of preferred stock, such shares will
rank on an equal basis with each other series of preferred stock
and prior to the common stock as to dividends and distributions
of assets.
Dividends
Holders of each series of preferred stock will be entitled to
receive cash dividends when, as and if declared by our board of
directors out of funds legally available for dividends. The
rates and dates of payment of dividends will be set forth in the
prospectus supplement relating to each series of preferred
stock. Dividends will be payable to holders of record of
preferred stock as they appear on our books or, if applicable,
the records of the depositary referred to below on the record
dates fixed by the board of directors. Dividends on a series of
preferred stock may be cumulative or noncumulative.
We may not declare, pay or set apart for payment dividends on
the preferred stock unless full dividends on other series of
preferred stock that rank on an equal or senior basis have been
paid or sufficient funds have been set apart for payment for
|
|
|
|
|
all prior dividend periods of other series of preferred stock
that pay dividends on a cumulative basis; or |
|
|
|
the immediately preceding dividend period of other series of
preferred stock that pay dividends on a noncumulative basis. |
Partial dividends declared on shares of preferred stock and each
other series of preferred stock ranking on an equal basis as to
dividends will be declared pro rata. A pro rata declaration
means that the ratio of dividends declared per share to accrued
dividends per share will be the same for each series of
preferred stock.
Similarly, we may not declare, pay or set apart for payment
non-stock dividends or make other payments on the common stock
or any other of our stock ranking junior to the preferred stock
until full dividends on the preferred stock have been paid or
set apart for payment for
|
|
|
|
|
all prior dividend periods if the preferred stock pays dividends
on a cumulative basis; or |
|
|
|
the immediately preceding dividend period if the preferred stock
pays dividends on a noncumulative basis. |
Conversion and Exchange
The prospectus supplement for a series of preferred stock will
state the terms, if any, on which shares of that series are
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock,
our preferred stock, our other securities or the debt or equity
securities of one or more other entities.
5
Redemption and Sinking Fund
If so specified in the applicable prospectus supplement, a
series of preferred stock may be redeemable at any time, in
whole or in part, at our option or the option of the holder
thereof and may be mandatorily redeemed. Any partial redemptions
of preferred stock will be made in a way that the board of
directors decides is equitable.
Unless we default in the payment of the redemption price,
dividends will cease to accrue after the redemption date on
shares of preferred stock called for redemption and all rights
of holders of such shares will terminate except for the right to
receive the redemption price.
No series of preferred stock will receive the benefit of a
sinking fund except as set forth in the applicable prospectus
supplement.
Liquidation Preference
Upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding up, holders of each series of preferred stock will be
entitled to receive distributions upon liquidation in the amount
set forth in the prospectus supplement relating to such series
of preferred stock, plus an amount equal to any accrued and
unpaid dividends. Such distributions will be made before any
distribution is made on any securities ranking junior relating
to liquidation, including common stock.
If the liquidation amounts payable relating to the preferred
stock of any series and any other securities ranking on a parity
regarding liquidation rights are not paid in full, the holders
of the preferred stock of such series and such other securities
will share in any such distribution of our available assets on a
ratable basis in proportion to the full liquidation preferences.
Holders of such series of preferred stock will not be entitled
to any other amounts from us after they have received their full
liquidation preference.
Voting Rights
The holders of shares of preferred stock will have no voting
rights, except:
|
|
|
|
|
as otherwise stated in the prospectus supplement; |
|
|
|
as otherwise stated in the certificate of designation
establishing such series; and |
|
|
|
as required by applicable law. |
Holders of our 4% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock are
entitled to one vote for each share held by such holder on all
matters voted upon by our common stockholders.
Common Stock
The following description of our common stock is only a summary.
We encourage you to read our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, which is incorporated by reference into the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. As
of the date of this prospectus, we are authorized to issue up to
500,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value
per share. As of December 16, 2005, we had outstanding
80,701,888 shares of our common stock.
Liquidation Rights
Upon voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding up, the holders of our common stock share ratably in the
assets remaining after payments to creditors and provision for
the preference of any preferred stock.
Dividends
Except as otherwise provided by the Delaware General Corporation
Law or our amended and restated certificate of incorporation,
the holders of our common stock, subject to the rights of
holders of any series of
6
preferred stock, shall share ratably in all dividends as may
from time to time be declared by our board of directors in
respect of our common stock out of funds legally available for
the payment thereof and payable in cash, stock or otherwise, and
in all other distributions (including, without limitation, our
dissolution, liquidation and winding up), whether in respect of
liquidation or dissolution (voluntary or involuntary) or
otherwise, after payment of liabilities and liquidation
preference on any outstanding preferred stock.
Voting Rights
Except as otherwise provided by the Delaware General Corporation
Law or our certificate of incorporation and subject to the
rights of holders of any series of preferred stock, all the
voting power of our stockholders shall be vested in the holders
of our common stock, and each holder of our common stock shall
have one vote for each share held by such holder on all matters
voted upon by our stockholders.
Subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding shares of
preferred stock to act by written consent, our stockholders may
not take any action by written consent in lieu of a meeting and
must take any action at a duly called annual or special meeting
of stockholders.
The affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the
combined voting power of our outstanding shares eligible to vote
in the election of directors is required to alter, amend or
repeal provisions in the amended and restated certificate of
incorporation regarding indemnification, classification of
directors, action by written consent and changes to voting
requirements applicable to such provisions.
Conversion and Exchange
Our common stock is not convertible into, or exchangeable for,
any other class or series of our capital stock.
Miscellaneous
Holders of our common stock have no preemptive or other rights
to subscribe for or purchase additional securities of ours. We
are subject to Section 203 of the DGCL. Shares of our
common stock are not subject to calls or assessments. No
personal liability will attach to holders of our common stock
under the laws of the State of Delaware (our state of
incorporation) or of the State of New Jersey (the state in which
our principal place of business is located). All of the
outstanding shares of our common stock are fully paid and
nonassessable. Our common stock is listed and traded on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol NRG.
Ratios Of Earnings To
Fixed Charges and Earnings To Combined Fixed Charges and
Preference Dividends
The ratios of earnings to fixed charges and earnings to combined
fixed charges and preference dividends for the periods indicated
are stated below. For this purpose, earnings include
pre-tax income (loss) before adjustments for minority interest
in our consolidated subsidiaries and income or loss from equity
investees, plus fixed charges and distributed income of equity
investees, reduced by interest capitalized. Fixed
charges include interest, whether expensed or capitalized,
amortization of debt expense and the portion of rental expense
that is representative of the interest factor in these rentals.
Preference dividends equals the amount of pre-tax
earnings that is required to pay the dividends on outstanding
preference securities. Predecessor Company refers to
NRGs operations prior to December 6, 2003, before
emergence from bankruptcy and
7
Reorganized NRG refers to NRGs operations from
December 6, 2003 onwards, after emergence from bankruptcy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganized NRG | |
|
Predecessor Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year | |
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
Year | |
|
December 6, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
2003 through | |
|
2003 through | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 5, | |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
1.19 |
x |
|
|
1.83 |
x |
|
|
1.68 |
x |
|
|
9.82 |
x(1) |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
1.26 |
x |
|
|
1.81 |
x |
Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preference
Dividends
|
|
|
1.04 |
x |
|
|
1.82 |
x |
|
|
1.68 |
x |
|
|
9.82 |
x(1) |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
1.26 |
x |
|
|
1.81 |
x |
|
|
(1) |
For the period January 1, 2003 through December 5,
2003, the earnings include a one time earning of $4,118,636,000
due to Fresh Start adjustments. |
|
(2) |
For the year ended December 31, 2002, the deficiency of
earnings to fixed charges was $3,023,467,000. |
Use Of
Proceeds
We intend to use the net proceeds from the sales of the
securities as set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement.
Validity Of The
Securities
In connection with particular offerings of the securities in the
future, and if stated in the applicable prospectus supplements,
the validity of those securities may be passed upon for the
Company by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
New York, New York, and for any underwriters or agents by
counsel named in the applicable prospectus supplement.
Experts
The consolidated financial statements and schedule of NRG
Energy, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2004, and for
the year then ended, and managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, included in the Companys
Form 10-K, as
amended on
Form 8-K dated
December 20, 2005, which is incorporated by reference in
this registration statement, have been incorporated by reference
herein in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP, an independent
registered accounting firm, incorporated by reference herein,
and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The consolidated financial statements and schedule of NRG South
Central Generating LLC and subsidiaries and the financial
statements and schedule of Louisiana Generating LLC as of
December 31, 2004 and for the year then ended, the
consolidated financial statements of NRG Northeast Generating
LLC and subsidiaries, NRG Mid Atlantic Generating LLC and
subsidiaries, NRG International LLC and subsidiaries and the
financial statements of Indian River Power LLC and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2004 and for the year then ended, the
financial statements of Oswego Harbor Power LLC as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the year ended
December 31, 2003 and the period from December 6, 2003
to December 31, 2003 and the statements of operations,
members equity and comprehensive income and cash flows of
Oswego Harbor Power LLC for the period from January 1, 2003
to December 5, 2003, have been incorporated by reference
herein in reliance on the reports of KPMG LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, incorporated by
reference herein, and upon authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of NRG Energy, Inc. as of
December 31, 2003 and for the period December 6, 2003
through December 31, 2003, the period January 1, 2003
through December 5, 2003 and the year ended
December 31, 2002 incorporated in this prospectus by
reference to NRG Energy, Inc.s annual
8
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004, as amended on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2005,
which is incorporated by reference in this registration
statement, have been so incorporated in reliance on the reports
of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
The consolidated financial statements of NRG Northeast
Generating LLC, NRG South Central Generating LLC, Louisiana
Generating LLC, NRG Mid Atlantic Generating LLC, Indian River
Power LLC, and NRG International LLC as of December 31,
2003 and for the period from December 6, 2003 through
December 31, 2003, the period from January 1, 2003
through December 5, 2003 and the year ended
December 31, 2002 incorporated in this prospectus by
reference to NRG Energy, Inc.s current report on
Form 8-K dated June 14, 2005, have been so
incorporated in reliance on the reports of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
The consolidated financial statements of West Coast Power LLC
incorporated in this prospectus by reference to NRG Energy,
Inc.s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004, as amended on Form 8-K dated
December 20, 2005, which is incorporated by reference in
this registration statement, have been so incorporated in
reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, given on the
authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
The consolidated balance sheet of Texas Genco LLC and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, members
equity and comprehensive loss for the period from July 19,
2004 to December 31, 2004, all incorporated in this
prospectus by reference to NRG Energy, Inc.s current
report on
Form 8-K, filed on
December 21, 2005, have been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as
stated in their report, which is incorporated herein by
reference and has been so incorporated in reliance upon the
report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The consolidated balance sheet of Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the
related statements of consolidated operations, cash flows, and
capitalization and shareholders equity for each of the
three years for the period ended December 31, 2004, and the
statement of consolidated comprehensive loss for each of the
three years for the period ended December 31, 2004, all
incorporated in this prospectus by reference to NRG Energy,
Inc.s current report on
Form 8-K, filed on
December 21, 2005, have been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as
stated in their report, which is incorporated herein by
reference and has been so incorporated in reliance upon the
report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
9
________________________________________________________________________________
20,855,057 Shares
NRG Energy, Inc.
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
LEHMAN BROTHERS
|
|
|
BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC |