Eaton Vance Muni Income Trust
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-09141
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust
(Exact Name of registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Maureen A. Gemma
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(registrants Telephone Number)
November 30
Date of Fiscal Year End
May 31, 2009
Date of Reporting Period
Semiannual Report May 31, 2009 |
EATON VANCE
MUNICIPAL
INCOME
TRUST |
IMPORTANT
NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed
to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial
institutions identified below has in effect the following policy
(Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal
information about its customers:
|
|
|
|
|
Only such information received from you, through application
forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund
transactions will be collected. This may include information
such as name, address, social security number, tax status,
account balances and transactions.
|
|
|
|
None of such information about you (or former customers) will be
disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes
disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In
the normal course of servicing a customers account, Eaton
Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that
perform various required services such as transfer agents,
custodians and broker/dealers.
|
|
|
|
Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and
procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect
the confidentiality of such information.
|
|
|
|
We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time
upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review
our Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our
homepage: www.eatonvance.com.
|
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within
the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds,
Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston
Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy only applies to those Eaton
Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct
relationship with us. If a customers account (i.e., fund
shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial
adviser/brokerdealer, it is likely that only such advisers
privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes
all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vances Privacy Policy,
please call
1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC) permits funds to
deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including
prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund
investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post
office box address. This practice is often called
householding and it helps eliminate duplicate
mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the
mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton
Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be
householded, please contact Eaton Vance at
1-800-262-1122,
or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of
your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days
of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its
underlying Portfolio (if applicable) will file a schedule of its
portfolio holdings on
Form N-Q
with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal
year. The
Form N-Q
will be available on the Eaton Vance website www.eatonvance.com,
by calling Eaton Vance at
1-800-262-1122
or in the EDGAR database on the SECs website at
www.sec.gov.
Form N-Q
may also be reviewed and copied at the SECs public
reference room in Washington, D.C. (call
1-800-732-0330
for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required
to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The
Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable)
vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures
approved by the Funds and Portfolios Boards. You may
obtain a description of these policies and procedures and
information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies
relating to portfolio securities during the most recent
12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon
request, by calling
1-800-262-1122.
This description is also available on the SECs website at
www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2009
INVESTMENT UPDATE
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust (the Trust) is a
closed-end Trust, traded on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol EVN, designed to provide current
income exempt from regular federal income tax. This
income is earned by investing primarily in
investment-grade municipal securities.
Economic and Market Conditions
During the six-month period ending May 31, 2009,
investors began to see signs of hope as the capital
markets generally rallied and began to stabilize. Despite
continued economic weakness the U.S. economy
contracted by 6.3% (annualized) in the fourth quarter of
2008 and 5.5% (annualized) in the first quarter of 2009
the Obama administrations massive spending proposals
served as a catalyst for optimism. February was a
particularly strong month for economic data: factory
orders increased 1.8%; new home sales rose 4.7%; and
existing home sales surged 5.1%. The upturn in the
housing market was bolstered by historically low mortgage
rates, an $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers
that was part of President Obamas stimulus legislation,
and a plethora of distressed properties on the market.
Unemployment, on the other hand, rose to
9.4% in May 2009 from 7.2% in December 2008.
On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed a historic
$787 billion stimulus program into law and outlined a
$50 billion foreclosure rescue plan. These programs
followed the $700 billion financial institution rescue
legislation passed last fall. Additionally, the U.S.
Federal Reserve kept the federal funds rate at a range
of 0.0% to 0.25%.
During the period, municipals rallied strongly from
extremely oversold levels reached in December 2008. As a
result, returns for municipals were impressive for the
six-month period, helping to make up for the losses
incurred in the fall of 2008. The Barclays Capital
Municipal Bond Index (the Index) a broad-based,
unmanaged index of municipal bonds gained 9.0%, while many of the state Lipper categories
average returns ranged from 20% to 30% for the six-month
period.1
Management Discussion
Relative to the Index, the Trust outperformed (at NAV)
for the six-month period ending May 31, 2009. The
six-month results reflect several factors, including
strong demand for longer-maturity municipal bonds and the
ebbing of negative technical factors that had plagued the
municipal market throughout 2008. The period included
December, an important demarcation point for the
municipal market, as municipal spreads reached all-time
peaks during the month amid especially high uncertainty
in the markets. In the period following December, the
municipal market witnessed five months of dramatic
rebound as headline risk abated, demand returned from
investors who had sought the relative safety of Treasury
bonds in 2008 and cautious optimism spread on signs of a
mildly improving economy. The renewed appetite for
municipal bonds was buoyed by legislative efforts aimed
at supporting the municipal market, much of which focused
on reducing tax-exempt municipal supply through the Build
America Bonds program and the federal stimulus provided
to states through the American Recovery & Reinvestment
Act of 2009. The result of these events during the period
was a dramatic rally for the sector as yields fell and
prices rose across the yield curve.
The Trust invests primarily in bonds with stated maturities of 10 years or
longer, as longer-maturity bonds historically have
provided greater tax-exempt income for investors than
shorter-maturity bonds. While the price declines
experienced by municipals in 2008 were most pronounced on
the long end of the yield curve, longer-maturity bonds
outperformed shorter maturities during the period, thus
providing the basis for much of the Trusts
outperformance relative to the Index. Higher allocations
to revenue bonds also contributed positively as general
obligation bonds trailed revenue issues during the
period.
The employment of leverage and leveraged investments in
the Trust, through which additional exposure to the
municipal market is achieved, was yet another positive
factor during the period. Leverage has the impact
|
|
|
1 |
|
It is not possible to invest directly in an Index
or a Lipper Classification. The Indexs total return does not
reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities
represented in the Index. |
|
|
|
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
1
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2009
INVESTMENT UPDATE
of enhancing returns during up markets while
exacerbating performance on the downside. Given the
broad rally in the municipal sector during the period,
the use of leverage was a contributor to performance.
As we move ahead, we maintain our long-term perspective
on the markets against the backdrop of relatively short
periods of market volatility. We will continue to
actively manage municipals in this environment like in
all others with the same income-focused, relative
value approach we have always employed. We believe that
this approach, which is based on careful credit research
and our decades of experience in the municipal market,
has served municipal investors well over the long term.
In addition, many state governments, particularly
California, face significant budget deficits that are
driven primarily by a steep decline in tax revenues. We
will continue to monitor any new developments as state
legislatures formulate solutions to address these fiscal
problems.
A Note Regarding The Use Of Leverage
The Trust employs leverage through the issuance of
Auction Preferred Shares (APS) and the use of tender
option bond (TOB) financing.1 The Trusts APS and TOB
percentage leverage as of May 31, 2009 is reflected on
page 3. The leverage created by APS and TOB investments
provides an opportunity for increased income but, at the
same time, creates special risks (including the
likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and
share price of the common shares).
During the period, the Trust redeemed a portion of its
outstanding APS, representing 394 shares and $9,850,000
in liquidation preferences, to reduce the amount of the
Trusts financial leverage. Information relating to
these redemptions is contained in Note 2 to the
Financial Statements.
Acquisition of National Municipal Income Trust
Prior to the opening of business on May 28, 2009, the
Trust acquired the net assets of Eaton Vance National
Municipal Income Trust pursuant to a plan of
reorganization approved by the shareholders of Eaton
Vance National Municipal Income Trust. The acquisition
was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of common shares
of the Trust for the common shares of Eaton Vance
National Municipal Income Trust outstanding on May 27,
2009, and newly-issued Series C APS of the Trust in
exchange for APS of Eaton Vance National Municipal Income
Trust outstanding on May 27, 2009. See Note 11 to the
Financial Statements for more information on the
reorganization.
|
|
|
1 |
|
See Note 1H to the Financial Statements for
more information on TOB investments. |
Trust shares are not insured by the FDIC and are
not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed
by, any depository institution. Shares are subject
to investment risks, including possible loss of
principal invested.
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio manager and are current only
through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to
change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any
responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and,
because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an
indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in
the report may not be representative of the Trusts current or future investments and may change
due to active management.
2
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust as of May 31, 2009
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Performance1 |
|
|
NYSE Symbol |
|
EVN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by share price) |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
30.66 |
% |
One Year |
|
|
-18.52 |
|
Five Years |
|
|
-0.14 |
|
Ten Years |
|
|
4.30 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value) |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
23.83 |
% |
One Year |
|
|
-23.43 |
|
Five Years |
|
|
0.02 |
|
Ten Years |
|
|
2.96 |
|
Life of Trust (1/29/99) |
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium/(Discount) to NAV |
|
|
9.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Market Yields |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Yield2 |
|
|
7.99 |
% |
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield3 |
|
|
12.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index Performance4 (Average Annual Total Returns) |
|
|
|
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index |
|
Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index |
|
Six Months |
|
|
9.00 |
% |
|
|
14.40 |
% |
One Year |
|
|
3.57 |
|
|
|
-2.50 |
|
Five Years |
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
Ten Years |
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
4.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lipper Averages5 (Average Annual Total Returns) |
|
Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) |
|
Classification (by net asset value) |
|
Six Months |
|
|
17.36 |
% |
One Year |
|
|
-5.77 |
|
Five Years |
|
|
2.72 |
|
Ten Years |
|
|
4.26 |
|
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Returns are historical and are calculated by determining
the percentage change in net asset value or share price
(as applicable) with all distributions reinvested.
Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so
that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than
their original cost. Performance is for the stated time
period only; due to market volatility, the Trusts
current performance may be lower or higher than the
quoted return. For performance as of the most recent
month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Portfolio Manager: Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
Rating Distribution*6
By total investments
|
|
|
* |
|
The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose
vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Trusts financial
statements. Absent such securities, the Trusts rating distribution at May 31, 2009, is as follows,
and the average rating is A-: |
|
|
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
AA |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
A |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
BBB |
|
|
16.8 |
% |
BB |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
B |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
CCC |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Not Rated |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
Trust Statistics7
|
|
|
Number of Issues: |
|
190 |
Average Maturity: |
|
25.2 years |
Average Effective Maturity: |
|
22.8 years |
Average Call Protection: |
|
9.2 years |
Average Dollar Price: |
|
$80.09 |
APS Leverage**: |
|
30.2% |
TOB Leverage**: |
|
16.1% |
|
|
|
** |
|
APS leverage represents the liquidation value of the Trusts Auction Preferred Shares (APS)
outstanding at 5/31/09 as a percentage of the Trusts net assets applicable to common shares plus
APS and tender option bond (TOB) Floating Rate Notes. TOB leverage represents the amount of
Floating Rate Notes outstanding at 5/31/09 as a percentage of the Trusts net assets applicable to
common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes in both calculations reflect
the effect of TOBs purchased in secondary market transactions. |
|
1 |
|
Six-month returns are cumulative. Returns are historical and are calculated by
determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value (as applicable) with all
distributions reinvested. The Trusts performance at share price will differ from its results at
NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during
shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing
perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trusts
shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of APS
outstanding and TOB investments, which are forms of investment leverage. Use of leverage creates an
opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the
likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares).
2 The Trusts market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per common
share of the semiannual period by the share price at the end of the semiannual period and
annualizing the result.3 Taxable-equivalent
figure assumes a maximum 35.00% federal income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower
tax-equivalent figure.4 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices
total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually
purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of
month end only.5 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset
value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to
invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds,
as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged)
Classification (closed-end) contained 58, 58, 57 and 41 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and
10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only.6
Rating distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total
investments of the Trust. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment
decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the
ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently
issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the
issuers current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not
necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a securitys market value or of the
liquidity of an investment in the security.7 Trust holdings information excludes
securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note
1H to the Trusts financial statements. |
3
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF
INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt
Investments 185.3%
|
|
Principal
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s
omitted)
|
|
|
Security
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cogeneration 1.1%
|
|
$
|
2,950
|
|
|
Maryland Energy Cogeneration, (AES Warrior Run), (AMT),
7.40%, 9/1/19
|
|
$
|
2,277,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,277,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education 13.8%
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
|
California Educational Facilities Authority,
(Stanford University),
5.25%, 12/1/32(1)
|
|
$
|
9,296,100
|
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(Boston University), 5.45%, 5/15/59
|
|
|
2,695,195
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(Boston University), 6.00%, 5/15/59
|
|
|
1,054,790
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (New England
Conservatory of Music), 5.25%, 7/1/38
|
|
|
410,405
|
|
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Harvard University),
5.00%, 10/1/38(1)
|
|
|
2,573,879
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Harvard University), 5.00%, 10/1/38
|
|
|
10,337
|
|
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (Cornell University),
5.00%, 7/1/39(1)
|
|
|
10,784,340
|
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (Rochester Institute of
Technology), 6.00%, 7/1/33
|
|
|
782,409
|
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
Oregon Health and Science University,
5.75%, 7/1/39(4)
|
|
|
907,361
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (University
of Rhode Island), 6.25%, 9/15/34
|
|
|
1,027,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,542,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric
Utilities 4.8%
|
|
$
|
1,300
|
|
|
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Revenue, (Texas
Energy Co.), (AMT), 5.40%, 5/1/29
|
|
$
|
578,747
|
|
|
|
|
4,865
|
|
|
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Revenue, (Texas
Energy Co.), (AMT), 8.25%, 5/1/33
|
|
|
2,615,667
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Revenue, (Texas
Energy Co.), (AMT), 6.75% to 4/1/13 (Put Date), 4/1/38
|
|
|
1,203,420
|
|
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Dominion Energy
Brayton Point), (AMT), 5.00%, 2/1/36
|
|
|
2,454,805
|
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Reliant
Energy, Inc.), (AMT), 6.75%, 12/1/36
|
|
|
2,425,942
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Reliant
Energy, Inc.), Series A, (AMT), 6.75%, 12/1/36
|
|
|
951,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,229,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
Obligations 4.3%
|
|
$
|
5,500
|
|
|
California, 6.00%, 4/1/38
|
|
$
|
5,664,175
|
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
California, (AMT), 5.05%, 12/1/36
|
|
|
1,367,377
|
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
Port Authority of Houston, TX, (Harris County), (AMT),
5.625%, 10/1/38(1)
|
|
|
2,263,248
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Port Authority of Houston, TX, (Harris County), (AMT),
5.625%, 10/1/38
|
|
|
14,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,309,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health
Care-Miscellaneous 0.9%
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
Osceola County, FL, Industrial Development Authority, Community
Provider Pooled Loan, 7.75%, 7/1/17
|
|
$
|
119,420
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority,
(Mepsi Campus Project), 6.50%, 10/1/37
|
|
|
151,180
|
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider,
(Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates),
6.00%, 12/1/36(2)
|
|
|
339,126
|
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider,
(Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates),
6.25%, 12/1/36(2)
|
|
|
900,582
|
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider,
(Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates),
7.75%, 12/1/36(2)
|
|
|
341,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,851,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital 17.5%
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (John
Muir Health), 5.00%, 8/15/34
|
|
$
|
6,801,600
|
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health
System), 5.00%, 2/15/25
|
|
|
332,524
|
|
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health
System), 5.00%, 2/15/35
|
|
|
1,113,347
|
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health
System), 5.25%, 2/15/27
|
|
|
932,196
|
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
Chautauqua County, NY, Industrial Development Agency,
(Womens Christian Association), 6.35%, 11/15/17
|
|
|
658,881
|
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
Chautauqua County, NY, Industrial Development Agency,
(Womens Christian Association), 6.40%, 11/15/29
|
|
|
738,241
|
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
Idaho Health Facilities Authority, (Trinity Health Credit
Group), 6.25%, 12/1/33
|
|
|
473,854
|
|
|
|
See
notes to financial statements
4
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF
INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONTD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s
omitted)
|
|
|
Security
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,575
|
|
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Tuoro Infirmary),
5.625%, 8/15/29
|
|
$
|
1,809,478
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Martin County, MN, (Fairmont Community Hospital Association),
6.625%, 9/1/22
|
|
|
1,772,240
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Caregroup, Inc.), 5.00%, 7/1/28
|
|
|
1,829,600
|
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Caregroup, Inc.), 5.125%, 7/1/33
|
|
|
2,483,320
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
Mecosta County, MI, (Michigan General Hospital),
6.00%, 5/15/18
|
|
|
2,183,625
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Monroe County, PA, Hospital Authority, (Pocono Medical
Center), 5.25%, 1/1/43
|
|
|
2,588,010
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center),
5.00%, 7/1/36(1)
|
|
|
2,452,600
|
|
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center),
6.125%, 12/1/29
|
|
|
1,165,012
|
|
|
|
|
2,930
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center),
6.25%, 12/1/37
|
|
|
2,188,534
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
North Central, TX, Health Facility Development Corp., (Baylor
Healthcare System),
5.125%, 5/15/29(3)
|
|
|
4,856,950
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
St. Paul, MN, Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Health Care
Revenues, (Health Partners), 5.25%, 5/15/36
|
|
|
1,225,455
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, (Wellmont Health),
5.25%, 9/1/37
|
|
|
671,290
|
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
West Orange, FL, Health Care District, 5.80%, 2/1/31
|
|
|
1,256,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,533,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing 19.1%
|
|
$
|
1,630
|
|
|
California Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.75%, 8/1/42
|
|
$
|
1,180,365
|
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
California Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), Variable Rate,
23.969%, 8/1/38(2)(5)(6)
|
|
|
129,458
|
|
|
|
|
4,870
|
|
|
California Rural Home Mortgage Finance Authority, (AMT),
5.50%, 8/1/47
|
|
|
3,065,421
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
Charter Mac Equity Trust, TN,
6.00%, 4/30/19(2)
|
|
|
4,131,560
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
Charter Mac Equity Trust, TN,
6.625%, 6/30/49(2)(7)
|
|
|
4,010,240
|
|
|
|
|
2,085
|
|
|
Colorado Housing and Finance Authority, (Birchwood Manor
Project), (GNMA), (AMT), 5.50%, 9/20/36
|
|
|
2,081,893
|
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
Fairfax County, VA, Redevelopment and Housing Authority, (Cedar
Ridge), (AMT), 4.85%, 10/1/48
|
|
|
1,243,056
|
|
|
|
|
4,135
|
|
|
Georgia Housing and Finance Authority, (AMT), 5.25%, 12/1/37
|
|
|
3,918,822
|
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
Lake Creek, CO, Affordable Housing Corp.,
Multi-family,
7.00%, 12/1/23
|
|
|
1,465,263
|
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 5.30%, 12/1/37
|
|
|
658,923
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
Muni Mae Tax-Exempt Bond, LLC,
6.875%, 6/30/49(2)
|
|
|
2,799,600
|
|
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
North Little Rock, AR, Residential Housing Facilities,
(Parkstone Place), 6.50%, 8/1/21
|
|
|
2,419,753
|
|
|
|
|
3,545
|
|
|
Ohio Housing Finance Agency, (Residential Mortgage Backed
Securities), (FNMA), (GNMA), (AMT), 4.75%, 3/1/37
|
|
|
3,082,484
|
|
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
|
Oregon Health Authority, (Trillium Affordable Housing), (AMT),
6.75%, 2/15/29
|
|
|
2,747,813
|
|
|
|
|
4,395
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.70%, 10/1/37
|
|
|
3,768,361
|
|
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
Texas Student Housing Corp., (University of Northern Texas),
6.75%, 7/1/16
|
|
|
2,870,571
|
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT),
5.10%, 10/1/35
|
|
|
1,366,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,939,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial
Development Revenue 29.7%
|
|
$
|
1,680
|
|
|
ABIA Development Corp., TX, (Austin CargoPort Development),
(AMT), 6.50%, 10/1/24
|
|
$
|
1,288,661
|
|
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
|
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District, (Dow Chemical
Co.), (AMT), 5.95%, 5/15/33
|
|
|
3,936,266
|
|
|
|
|
2,120
|
|
|
Broward County, FL, (Lynxs CargoPort), (AMT), 6.75%, 6/1/19
|
|
|
1,790,467
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Butler County, AL, Industrial Development Authority,
(International Paper Co.), (AMT), 7.00%, 9/1/32
|
|
|
872,810
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
California Pollution Control Financing Authority,
(Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.), (AMT), 6.875%, 11/1/27
|
|
|
3,000,930
|
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Solid Waste
Disposal), (AMT), 5.40%, 4/1/25
|
|
|
1,205,191
|
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
Capital Trust Agency, FL, (Fort Lauderdale Project),
(AMT), 5.75%, 1/1/32
|
|
|
724,213
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
Cartersville, GA, Development Authority Sewer and Solid Waste
Disposal Facility, (Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc.), (AMT),
5.50%, 3/1/44
|
|
|
9,662,520
|
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
Denver, CO, City and County Special Facilities, (United
Airlines), (AMT), 5.25%, 10/1/32
|
|
|
1,856,112
|
|
|
|
|
5,305
|
|
|
Denver, CO, City and County Special Facilities, (United
Airlines), (AMT), 5.75%, 10/1/32
|
|
|
3,741,935
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Gulf Coast, TX, Waste Disposal Authority, (Valero Energy
Corp.), 5.60%, 4/1/32
|
|
|
800,600
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
Gulf Coast, TX, Waste Disposal Authority, (Valero Energy
Corp.), (AMT), 5.70%, 4/1/32
|
|
|
2,028,775
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Houston, TX, Airport System, (Continental Airlines), (AMT),
6.75%, 7/1/29
|
|
|
838,970
|
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
Liberty Development Corp., NY, (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.),
5.25%, 10/1/35(1)
|
|
|
1,265,042
|
|
|
|
|
5,390
|
|
|
Liberty Development Corp., NY, (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.),
5.25%, 10/1/35
|
|
|
5,050,430
|
|
|
|
See
notes to financial statements
5
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF
INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONTD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s
omitted)
|
|
|
Security
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial
Development Revenue (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental
Airlines), (AMT), 6.25%, 9/15/29
|
|
$
|
2,370,150
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
New Morgan, PA, Industrial Development Authority,
(Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.), (AMT), 6.50%, 4/1/19
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
8,140
|
|
|
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (American Airlines,
Inc. - JFK International Airport), (AMT), 7.75%, 8/1/31
|
|
|
7,591,038
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (American Airlines,
Inc. - JFK International Airport), (AMT), 8.50%, 8/1/28
|
|
|
3,489,465
|
|
|
|
|
4,630
|
|
|
Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (America West
Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/19
|
|
|
3,237,990
|
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), (AMT),
6.30%, 6/1/23
|
|
|
300,567
|
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
Savannah, GA, Economic Development Authority,
(Intercat-Savannah), (AMT), 7.00%, 1/1/38
|
|
|
1,555,323
|
|
|
|
|
6,980
|
|
|
St. John Baptist Parish, LA, (Marathon Oil Corp.),
5.125%, 6/1/37
|
|
|
5,914,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,522,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured-Electric
Utilities 2.3%
|
|
$
|
1,600
|
|
|
Burke County, GA, Development Authority, (Georgia Power Co.),
(NPFG), (AMT), 5.45%, 5/1/34
|
|
$
|
1,451,824
|
|
|
|
|
3,820
|
|
|
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Pacific Gas
and Electric Co.), (FGIC), (AMT), 4.75%, 12/1/23
|
|
|
3,458,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,909,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital 15.8%
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, (Rush University Medical Center),
(NPFG), 5.25%, 11/1/35
|
|
$
|
2,169,875
|
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
Indiana Health and Educational Facilities Finance Authority,
(Sisters of St. Francis Health Services), (FSA),
5.25%, 5/15/41(1)
|
|
|
3,147,268
|
|
|
|
|
16,820
|
|
|
Kentucky Economic Development Authority, (Norton Healthcare,
Inc.), (NPFG), 0.00%, 10/1/25
|
|
|
5,320,503
|
|
|
|
|
19,165
|
|
|
Kentucky Economic Development Authority, (Norton Healthcare,
Inc.), (NPFG), 0.00%, 10/1/26
|
|
|
5,546,926
|
|
|
|
|
8,590
|
|
|
Kentucky Economic Development Authority, (Norton Healthcare,
Inc.), (NPFG), 0.00%, 10/1/27
|
|
|
2,306,501
|
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
Maricopa County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Catholic
Healthcare West), (BHAC), 5.25%, 7/1/32
|
|
|
1,659,271
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Maricopa County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Mayo
Clinic Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 11/15/37
|
|
|
1,001,000
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
(Lifebridge Health), (AGC),
4.75%, 7/1/47(1)
|
|
|
2,189,700
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Meridian
Health Center), Series I, (AGC),
5.00%, 7/1/38(1)
|
|
|
9,819,000
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Meridian
Health Center), Series V, (AGC),
5.00%, 7/1/38(1)
|
|
|
736,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,896,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured-Housing 0.5%
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
Broward County, FL, Housing Finance Authority, Multi-Family
Housing, (Venice Homes Apartments), (FSA), (AMT),
5.70%, 1/1/32
|
|
$
|
1,087,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,087,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured-Lease
Revenue / Certificates of
Participation 2.4%
|
|
$
|
2,665
|
|
|
Hudson, NY, Yards Infrastructure Corp., (NPFG),
4.50%, 2/15/47
|
|
$
|
2,157,557
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
San Diego County, CA, Water Authority, (FSA),
5.00%, 5/1/38(1)
|
|
|
2,928,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,085,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured-Other
Revenue 4.1%
|
|
$
|
4,210
|
|
|
Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority, (NPFG),
0.00%, 11/15/34
|
|
$
|
631,753
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, (Louisville
Arena), (AGC), 6.00%, 12/1/42
|
|
|
1,034,060
|
|
|
|
|
10,325
|
|
|
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium),
(AGC), 0.00%, 3/1/36
|
|
|
2,015,646
|
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium),
(AGC), 0.00%, 3/1/37
|
|
|
1,579,390
|
|
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium),
(AGC), 7.00%, 3/1/49
|
|
|
3,526,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,787,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured-Special
Tax Revenue 8.3%
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, IL, (FSA), (NPFG),
0.00%, 12/15/38
|
|
$
|
8,232,500
|
|
|
|
|
3,040
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Special Obligation, (NPFG),
0.00%, 10/1/35
|
|
|
490,139
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Special Obligation, (NPFG),
0.00%, 10/1/38
|
|
|
625,850
|
|
|
|
|
5,610
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Special Obligation, (NPFG),
0.00%, 10/1/40
|
|
|
602,458
|
|
|
|
|
3,775
|
|
|
New York Convention Center Development Corp., Hotel Occupancy
Tax, (AMBAC), 4.75%, 11/15/45
|
|
|
3,152,276
|
|
|
|
|
14,850
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54
|
|
|
821,056
|
|
|
|
See
notes to financial statements
6
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF
INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONTD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s
omitted)
|
|
|
Security
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured-Special
Tax Revenue (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,695
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/44
|
|
$
|
968,623
|
|
|
|
|
17,245
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45
|
|
|
1,799,861
|
|
|
|
|
10,850
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing, (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/46
|
|
|
1,057,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,750,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured-Student
Loan 6.7%
|
|
$
|
4,090
|
|
|
Maine Educational Authority, (AGC), 5.625%, 12/1/27
|
|
$
|
4,050,572
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, (AGC), (AMT),
6.35%, 1/1/30
|
|
|
1,012,460
|
|
|
|
|
7,940
|
|
|
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, (AMBAC), (AMT),
4.70%, 1/1/33
|
|
|
6,236,632
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
New Jersey Higher Education Assistance Authority, (AGC),
6.125%, 6/1/30
|
|
|
3,101,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,401,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation 14.4%
|
|
$
|
12,425
|
|
|
Alameda, CA, Corridor Transportation Authority, (NPFG),
0.00%, 10/1/33
|
|
$
|
2,792,643
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
Chicago, IL, (OHare International Airport), (AMBAC),
(AMT), 5.375%, 1/1/32
|
|
|
3,151,330
|
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
Chicago, IL, (OHare International Airport), (FSA),
4.50%, 1/1/38
|
|
|
587,764
|
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
Director of the State of Nevada Department of Business and
Industry, (Las Vegas Monorail), (AMBAC), 5.375%, 1/1/40
|
|
|
1,709,950
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Director of the State of Nevada Department of Business and
Industry, (Las Vegas Monorail), (AMBAC), 5.625%, 1/1/32
|
|
|
310,920
|
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
Maryland Transportation Authority, (FSA),
5.00%, 7/1/41(1)
|
|
|
2,141,412
|
|
|
|
|
5,050
|
|
|
Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Metropolitan Highway System,
(NPFG), 5.00%, 1/1/37
|
|
|
4,336,536
|
|
|
|
|
3,770
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Aviation Revenue,
(Miami International Airport), (AGC), (CIFG), (AMT),
5.00%, 10/1/38
|
|
|
3,266,178
|
|
|
|
|
3,140
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Aviation Revenue,
(Miami International Airport), (FSA), (AMT),
5.25%, 10/1/41
|
|
|
2,804,020
|
|
|
|
|
9,820
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG),
5.25%, 7/1/41(1)
|
|
|
9,610,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,711,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured-Water
and Sewer 3.7%
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
|
Austin, TX, Water and Wastewater, (BHAC), (FSA),
5.00%, 11/15/33(1)
|
|
$
|
3,824,775
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Emerald Coast, FL, Utility Authority Revenue, (FGIC), (NPFG),
4.75%, 1/1/31
|
|
|
926,090
|
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
Fernley, NV, Water and Sewer, (AGC),
5.00%, 2/1/38(1)
|
|
|
3,012,230
|
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
Pearland, TX, Waterworks and Sewer Systems, (FSA),
4.50%, 9/1/34
|
|
|
224,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,987,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
Revenue / Certificates of
Participation 2.3%
|
|
$
|
4,400
|
|
|
Mohave County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Mohave
Prison LLC), 8.00%, 5/1/25
|
|
$
|
4,931,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,931,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nursing
Home 1.1%
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
|
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Westminster
Community Care), 6.60%, 4/1/24
|
|
$
|
229,946
|
|
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
|
Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Westminster
Community Care), 6.75%, 4/1/34
|
|
|
2,212,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,442,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Revenue 14.8%
|
|
$
|
58,690
|
|
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, OH,
0.00%, 6/1/47
|
|
$
|
1,459,620
|
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
Central Falls, RI, Detention Facility Revenue,
7.25%, 7/15/35
|
|
|
1,367,562
|
|
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
|
Main Street National Gas, Inc., GA, Gas Project Revenue,
5.50%, 9/15/27
|
|
|
1,345,182
|
|
|
|
|
7,600
|
|
|
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, 6.00%, 6/1/48
|
|
|
5,283,900
|
|
|
|
|
2,350
|
|
|
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority,
6.875%, 6/1/42
|
|
|
1,916,472
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Mohegan Tribe Indians Gaming Authority, CT,
(Public Improvements),
6.25%, 1/1/21(2)
|
|
|
1,084,110
|
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
Northern Tobacco Securitization Corp., AK, 0.00%, 6/1/46
|
|
|
68,126
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
Otero County, NM, (Jail Project Revenue), 5.50%, 4/1/13
|
|
|
152,490
|
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
Otero County, NM, (Jail Project Revenue), 5.75%, 4/1/18
|
|
|
307,789
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
Otero County, NM, (Jail Project Revenue), 6.00%, 4/1/23
|
|
|
79,353
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
Otero County, NM, (Jail Project Revenue), 6.00%, 4/1/28
|
|
|
82,504
|
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
Salt Verde, AZ, Financial Corp., Senior Gas Revenue,
5.00%, 12/1/37
|
|
|
7,199,640
|
|
|
|
See
notes to financial statements
7
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF
INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONTD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s
omitted)
|
|
|
Security
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Revenue (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
Seminole Tribe, FL, Special Obligation Revenue,
5.25%, 10/1/27(2)
|
|
$
|
3,364,560
|
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
Seminole Tribe, FL, Special Obligation Revenue,
5.50%, 10/1/24(2)
|
|
|
1,206,373
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Revenue,
5.00%, 2/1/22
|
|
|
888,950
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Revenue,
5.25%, 9/1/26
|
|
|
176,980
|
|
|
|
|
6,905
|
|
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., VA, 0.00%, 6/1/47
|
|
|
188,023
|
|
|
|
|
4,180
|
|
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., VA, 5.00%, 6/1/47
|
|
|
2,477,946
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Tobacco Settlement Management Authority, SC, Escrowed to
Maturity, 6.375%, 5/15/30
|
|
|
1,790,460
|
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
White Earth Band of Chippewa Indians, MN,
6.375%, 12/1/26(2)
|
|
|
904,709
|
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
Willacy County, TX, Local Government Corp., 6.00%, 9/1/10
|
|
|
287,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,632,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Living / Life Care 2.7%
|
|
$
|
3,210
|
|
|
Cliff House Trust, PA, (AMT),
6.625%, 6/1/27(9)
|
|
$
|
1,746,946
|
|
|
|
|
3,240
|
|
|
Logan County, CO, Industrial Development, (TLC Care
Choices, Inc.),
6.875%, 12/1/23(8)
|
|
|
2,227,922
|
|
|
|
|
2,990
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Linden Ponds,
Inc.), 5.75%, 11/15/42
|
|
|
1,820,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,795,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special
Tax Revenue 5.8%
|
|
$
|
3,280
|
|
|
Bell Mountain Ranch, CO, Metropolitan District,
6.625%, 11/15/25
|
|
$
|
3,044,627
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Covington Park, FL, Community Development District, (Capital
Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/21
|
|
|
77,415
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Covington Park, FL, Community Development District, (Capital
Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/31
|
|
|
421,715
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
Dupree Lakes, FL, Community Development District,
5.00%, 11/1/10
|
|
|
161,888
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
Dupree Lakes, FL, Community Development District,
5.00%, 5/1/12
|
|
|
133,014
|
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
Dupree Lakes, FL, Community Development District,
5.375%, 5/1/37
|
|
|
213,119
|
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
Heritage Harbor South, FL, Community Development District,
(Capital Improvements), 6.20%, 5/1/35
|
|
|
266,341
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
Heritage Springs, FL, Community Development District,
5.25%, 5/1/26
|
|
|
175,208
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
Longleaf, FL, Community Development District,
6.20%, 5/1/09(10)
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Cigarette Tax),
5.50%, 6/15/24
|
|
|
974,924
|
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Cigarette Tax),
5.75%, 6/15/29
|
|
|
1,739,884
|
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
New River, FL, Community Development District, (Capital
Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/13
|
|
|
145,486
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
New River, FL, Community Development District, (Capital
Improvements), 5.35%, 5/1/38
|
|
|
56,105
|
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
North Springs, FL, Improvement District, (Heron Bay),
5.20%, 5/1/27
|
|
|
203,714
|
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
North Springs, FL, Improvement District, (Heron Bay),
7.00%, 5/1/19
|
|
|
560,000
|
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
River Hall, FL, Community Development District, (Capital
Improvements), 5.45%, 5/1/36
|
|
|
502,867
|
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
Southern Hills, FL, Plantation I Community Development District,
5.80%, 5/1/35
|
|
|
270,320
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
Sterling Hill, FL, Community Development District,
6.20%, 5/1/35
|
|
|
499,848
|
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
Tisons Landing, FL, Community Development District,
5.625%, 5/1/37(10)
|
|
|
298,284
|
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
University Square, FL, Community Development District,
6.75%, 5/1/20
|
|
|
692,776
|
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
Waterlefe, FL, Community Development District, 6.95%, 5/1/31
|
|
|
630,932
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
West Palm Beach, FL, Community Redevelopment Agency, (Northwood
Pleasant Community), 5.00%, 3/1/29
|
|
|
147,039
|
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
West Palm Beach, FL, Community Redevelopment Agency, (Northwood
Pleasant Community), 5.00%, 3/1/35
|
|
|
1,000,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,310,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation 8.0%
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
Augusta, GA, (AMT), 5.35%, 1/1/28
|
|
$
|
1,009,260
|
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
Branson, MO, Regional Airport Transportation Development
District, (Branson Airport LLC), (AMT), 6.00%, 7/1/25
|
|
|
644,846
|
|
|
|
|
2,670
|
|
|
Branson, MO, Regional Airport Transportation Development
District, (Branson Airport LLC), (AMT), 6.00%, 7/1/37
|
|
|
1,722,097
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Los Angeles Department of Airports, CA, (Los Angeles
International Airport), (AMT), 5.375%, 5/15/33
|
|
|
959,050
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Aviation Revenue, 5.50%, 10/1/36
|
|
|
3,889,520
|
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
North Texas Tollway Authority Revenue, 5.75%, 1/1/38
|
|
|
1,493,987
|
|
|
|
|
7,290
|
|
|
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT),
5.75%, 3/15/35(1)
|
|
|
7,373,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,092,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
notes to financial statements
8
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF
INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONTD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s
omitted)
|
|
|
Security
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
and Sewer 1.2%
|
|
$
|
3,405
|
|
|
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority,
4.00%, 8/1/46(3)
|
|
$
|
2,667,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,667,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Tax-Exempt Investments 185.3%
|
|
|
(identified
cost $446,500,424)
|
|
$
|
396,696,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction
Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
|
|
|
Unpaid
Dividends (56.1)%
|
|
$
|
(120,157,312
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Assets, Less Liabilities (29.2)%
|
|
$
|
(62,474,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0%
|
|
$
|
214,064,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be
considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal
Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FNMA - Federal National Mortgage Association
FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
GNMA - Government National Mortgage Association
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
At May 31, 2009, the concentration of the Funds
investments in the various states, determined as a percentage of
total investments, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
14.1%
|
|
California
|
|
|
10.5%
|
|
Others, representing less than 10% individually
|
|
|
75.4%
|
|
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by
municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt
securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic
developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to
reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at
May 31, 2009, 31.4% of total investments are backed by bond
insurance of various financial institutions and financial
guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by
an individual financial institution ranged from 1.1% to 11.3% of
total investments.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Security represents the underlying municipal bond of a tender
option bond trust (see Note 1H). |
|
(2)
|
|
Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the
Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in
transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified
institutional buyers. At May 31, 2009, the aggregate value
of these securities is $19,211,916 or 9.0% of the Funds
net assets applicable to common shares. |
|
|
(3)
|
|
Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral
for open swap contracts or inverse floating-rate security
transactions. |
|
(4)
|
|
When-issued security. |
|
(5)
|
|
Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may require
the Fund to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a
significant decline in the market value of the security
underlying the inverse floater. In case of a shortfall, the
maximum potential amount of payments the Fund could ultimately
be required to make under the agreement is $1,640,000. However,
such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the
sale of the security underlying the inverse floater. |
|
(6)
|
|
Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond.
The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at
May 31, 2009. |
|
(7)
|
|
Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover
payable for when-issued securities. |
|
(8)
|
|
Security is in default and is making only partial interest
payments. |
|
(9)
|
|
Security is in default with respect to scheduled principal
payments. |
|
(10)
|
|
Defaulted bond. |
See
notes to financial statements
9
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Statement
of Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
May 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Investments, at value (identified cost, $446,500,424)
|
|
$
|
396,696,494
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
7,096,698
|
|
|
|
Receivable for investments sold
|
|
|
215,459
|
|
|
|
Deferred debt issuance costs
|
|
|
94,841
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
35,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
404,138,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued
|
|
$
|
62,460,000
|
|
|
|
Payable for when-issued securities
|
|
|
917,378
|
|
|
|
Payable for open swap contracts
|
|
|
789,767
|
|
|
|
Distributions payable
|
|
|
1,216,306
|
|
|
|
Due to custodian
|
|
|
3,625,123
|
|
|
|
Payable to affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment adviser fee
|
|
|
319,487
|
|
|
|
Administration fee
|
|
|
61,599
|
|
|
|
Trustees fees
|
|
|
2,465
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and fees payable
|
|
|
361,963
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
162,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
69,916,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction preferred shares (4,806 shares outstanding) at
liquidation value plus cumulative unpaid dividends
|
|
$
|
120,157,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to common shares
|
|
$
|
214,064,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
of Net Assets
|
|
Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares
authorized
|
|
$
|
224,034
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
301,445,345
|
|
|
|
Accumulated net realized loss
|
|
|
(38,360,590
|
)
|
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
1,349,735
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
(50,593,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to common shares
|
|
$
|
214,064,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
22,403,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Asset Value Per Common Share
|
|
Net assets applicable to common shares
¸
common shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
$
|
9.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
Income
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
10,383,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
10,383,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Investment adviser fee
|
|
$
|
958,637
|
|
|
|
Administration fee
|
|
|
273,896
|
|
|
|
Trustees fees and expenses
|
|
|
7,791
|
|
|
|
Custodian fee
|
|
|
124,068
|
|
|
|
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees
|
|
|
13,934
|
|
|
|
Legal and accounting services
|
|
|
88,083
|
|
|
|
Printing and postage
|
|
|
19,872
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and fees
|
|
|
500,152
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares service fee
|
|
|
101,463
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
58,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
$
|
2,146,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of custodian fee
|
|
$
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense reductions
|
|
$
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expenses
|
|
$
|
2,138,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
8,244,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized
and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|
Net realized gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment transactions
|
|
$
|
(15,461,959
|
)
|
|
|
Financial futures contracts
|
|
|
(5,154,492
|
)
|
|
|
Swap contracts
|
|
|
1,551,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized loss
|
|
$
|
(19,064,510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
38,814,290
|
|
|
|
Financial futures contracts
|
|
|
2,309,083
|
|
|
|
Swap contracts
|
|
|
3,330,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
$
|
44,453,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain
|
|
$
|
25,389,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to preferred shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
$
|
(445,853
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
33,188,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
notes to financial statements
10
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTD
Statements
of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
Months Ended May 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
May 31,
2009
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
in Net Assets
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
November 30,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
From operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
8,244,715
|
|
|
$
|
18,380,790
|
|
|
|
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial
futures contracts and swap contracts
|
|
|
(19,064,510
|
)
|
|
|
(6,883,712
|
)
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from
investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts
|
|
|
44,453,804
|
|
|
|
(101,099,926
|
)
|
|
|
Distributions to preferred shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
|
(445,853
|
)
|
|
|
(4,438,397
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
33,188,156
|
|
|
$
|
(94,041,245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to common shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
$
|
(8,494,629
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,895,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(8,494,629
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,895,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital share transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
757,962
|
|
|
$
|
1,216,140
|
|
|
|
Issued in connection with tax-free reorganization (see
Note 11)
|
|
|
48,359,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
|
|
$
|
49,117,657
|
|
|
$
|
1,216,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|
$
|
73,811,184
|
|
|
$
|
(106,720,679
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Assets Applicable to
Common Shares
|
|
At beginning of period
|
|
$
|
140,253,643
|
|
|
$
|
246,974,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of period
|
|
$
|
214,064,827
|
|
|
$
|
140,253,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
undistributed
net investment income
included in net assets
applicable to common shares
|
|
At end of period
|
|
$
|
1,349,735
|
|
|
$
|
2,045,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
Months
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From
Operating Activities
|
|
Ended
May 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
33,188,156
|
|
|
|
Distributions to preferred shareholders
|
|
|
445,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations excluding
distributions to preferred shareholders
|
|
$
|
33,634,009
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from
operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments purchased
|
|
|
(72,440,561
|
)
|
|
|
Investments sold
|
|
|
87,814,836
|
|
|
|
Net accretion/amortization of premium (discount)
|
|
|
(5,998,151
|
)
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
|
|
|
8,283
|
|
|
|
Decrease in interest receivable
|
|
|
383,278
|
|
|
|
Decrease in receivable for investments sold
|
|
|
4,369,869
|
|
|
|
Increase in other assets
|
|
|
(35,067
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in payable for investments purchased
|
|
|
(12,532,880
|
)
|
|
|
Increase in payable for when-issued securities
|
|
|
917,378
|
|
|
|
Decrease in payable for variation margin on open financial
futures contracts
|
|
|
(337,500
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in payable for open swap contracts
|
|
|
(3,330,431
|
)
|
|
|
Increase in payable to affiliate for investment adviser fee
|
|
|
111,559
|
|
|
|
Increase in payable to affiliate for administration fee
|
|
|
2,163
|
|
|
|
Decrease in payable to affiliate for Trustees fees
|
|
|
(10,134
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in interest expense and fees payable
|
|
|
(36,627
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in accrued expenses
|
|
|
(91,823
|
)
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from
investments
|
|
|
(38,814,290
|
)
|
|
|
Net realized (gain) loss from investments
|
|
|
15,461,959
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired in connection with tax-free reorganization
(see Note 11)
|
|
|
104,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
9,180,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
Cash distributions paid to common shareholders, net of
reinvestments
|
|
$
|
(6,520,361
|
)
|
|
|
Distributions to preferred shareholders
|
|
|
(457,528
|
)
|
|
|
Liquidation of auction preferred shares
|
|
|
(9,850,000
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from secured borrowings
|
|
|
21,060,000
|
|
|
|
Repayments of secured borrowings
|
|
|
(14,585,000
|
)
|
|
|
Increase in due to custodian
|
|
|
1,172,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
$
|
(9,180,145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
Noncash operating activities not included herein consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of net assets in connection with tax-free
reorganization (see Note 11), less cash acquired
|
|
$
|
48,255,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of dividends and distributions
|
|
$
|
757,962
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares of the Fund in connection with tax-free
reorganization (see Note 11)
|
|
$
|
48,359,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
notes to financial statements
11
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTD
Financial
Highlights
Selected
data for a common share outstanding during the periods
stated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
November 30,
|
|
|
May 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value Beginning of period (Common shares)
|
|
$
|
8.110
|
|
|
$
|
14.370
|
|
|
$
|
15.880
|
|
|
$
|
14.470
|
|
|
$
|
13.950
|
|
|
$
|
14.090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from operations
|
|
Net investment
income(1)
|
|
$
|
0.473
|
|
|
$
|
1.067
|
|
|
$
|
1.076
|
|
|
$
|
1.100
|
|
|
$
|
1.165
|
|
|
$
|
1.268
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
1.423
|
|
|
|
(6.262
|
)
|
|
|
(1.518
|
)
|
|
|
1.444
|
|
|
|
0.611
|
|
|
|
(0.128
|
)
|
|
|
Distributions to preferred shareholders from net investment
income(1)
|
|
|
(0.026
|
)
|
|
|
(0.258
|
)
|
|
|
(0.278
|
)
|
|
|
(0.252
|
)
|
|
|
(0.151
|
)
|
|
|
(0.090
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
1.870
|
|
|
$
|
(5.453
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.720
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.292
|
|
|
$
|
1.625
|
|
|
$
|
1.050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
distributions to common shareholders
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
$
|
(0.420
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.807
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.790
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.882
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.105
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.420
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.807
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.790
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.882
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.105
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value End of period (Common shares)
|
|
$
|
9.560
|
|
|
$
|
8.110
|
|
|
$
|
14.370
|
|
|
$
|
15.880
|
|
|
$
|
14.470
|
|
|
$
|
13.950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value End of period (Common shares)
|
|
$
|
10.510
|
|
|
$
|
8.450
|
|
|
$
|
13.300
|
|
|
$
|
16.010
|
|
|
$
|
14.960
|
|
|
$
|
16.150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return on Net Asset
Value(2)
|
|
|
23.83
|
%(9)
|
|
|
(39.72
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.62
|
)%
|
|
|
16.33
|
%
|
|
|
11.56
|
%
|
|
|
7.28
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return on Market
Value(2)
|
|
|
30.66
|
%(9)
|
|
|
(32.13
|
)%
|
|
|
(12.44
|
)%
|
|
|
13.43
|
%
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)%
|
|
|
12.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
See
notes to financial statements
12
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTD
Financial
Highlights
Selected data for
a common share outstanding during the periods stated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
November 30,
|
|
|
May 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental
Data
|
|
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period
(000s omitted)
|
|
$
|
214,065
|
|
|
$
|
140,254
|
|
|
$
|
246,974
|
|
|
$
|
272,274
|
|
|
$
|
246,915
|
|
|
$
|
236,303
|
|
|
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable
to common
shares):(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses excluding interest and fees
|
|
|
2.27
|
%(4)
|
|
|
1.84
|
%
|
|
|
1.71
|
%(5)
|
|
|
1.76
|
%
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
|
|
Interest and fee
expense(6)
|
|
|
0.69
|
%(4)
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
|
|
1.46
|
%
|
|
|
0.95
|
%
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
|
|
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
|
|
|
2.96
|
%(4)
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
3.06
|
%(5)
|
|
|
3.22
|
%
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
|
2.59
|
%
|
|
|
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and
fees
|
|
|
2.26
|
%(4)
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
1.70
|
%(5)
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
11.38
|
%(4)
|
|
|
8.45
|
%
|
|
|
7.02
|
%
|
|
|
7.27
|
%
|
|
|
8.08
|
%
|
|
|
9.14
|
%
|
|
|
Portfolio Turnover
|
|
|
22
|
%(9)
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable
solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets,
including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable
to common shares and preferred
shares):(3)
|
Expenses excluding interest and fees
|
|
|
1.34
|
%(4)
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
|
1.14
|
%(5)
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
|
1.15
|
%
|
|
|
Interest and fee
expense(6)
|
|
|
0.41
|
%(4)
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
|
0.97
|
%
|
|
|
0.62
|
%
|
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
|
|
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
|
|
|
1.75
|
%(4)
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
|
|
2.04
|
%(5)
|
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
|
|
1.66
|
%
|
|
|
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and
fees
|
|
|
1.33
|
%(4)
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
|
|
1.14
|
%(5)
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
6.71
|
%(4)
|
|
|
5.40
|
%
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
|
4.83
|
%
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preferred shares outstanding
|
|
|
4,806
|
|
|
|
4,394
|
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
|
Asset coverage per preferred
share(7)
|
|
$
|
69,543
|
|
|
$
|
56,919
|
|
|
$
|
72,138
|
|
|
$
|
76,963
|
|
|
$
|
72,128
|
|
|
$
|
70,112
|
|
|
|
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred
share(8)
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
Approximate market value per preferred
share(8)
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Computed using average common shares outstanding. |
|
(2)
|
|
Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the
percentage change in net asset value or market value with all
distributions reinvested. |
|
(3)
|
|
Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to
preferred shareholders. |
|
(4)
|
|
Annualized. |
|
(5)
|
|
The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the
Funds operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of
average daily net assets for the year ended November 30,
2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6)
|
|
Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating
rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities
transactions (see Note 1H). |
|
(7)
|
|
Calculated by subtracting the Funds total liabilities (not
including the preferred shares) from the Funds total
assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred
shares outstanding. |
|
(8)
|
|
Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. |
|
(9)
|
|
Not annualized. |
See
notes to financial statements
13
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1 Significant
Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust (the Fund) is a Massachusetts
business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a non-diversified,
closed-end management investment company. The Fund seeks to
provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of
the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
A Investment
Valuation Municipal bonds and taxable
obligations, if any, are generally valued on the basis of
valuations furnished by a pricing vendor, as derived from such
vendors pricing models. Inputs to the models may include,
but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and
asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, benchmark curves or
information pertaining to the issuer. The pricing vendor may use
a matrix approach, which considers information regarding
securities with similar characteristics to determine the
valuation for a security. Financial futures contracts and
options on financial futures contracts listed on one or more
exchanges are valued based on the last sale price on any
exchange on which such contract is listed. Interest rate swaps
are normally valued using valuations provided by pricing
vendors. Such vendor valuations are based on the present value
of fixed and projected floating rate cash flows over the term of
the swap contract. Future cash flows are discounted to their
present value using swap quotations provided by electronic data
services or by broker/dealers. Short-term obligations, maturing
in sixty days or less, are generally valued at amortized cost,
which approximates market value. Investments for which
valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are
deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods
determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees
of the Fund in a manner that most fairly reflects the
securitys value, or the amount that the Fund might
reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current
sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on
a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to
vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may
include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the
existence of any contractual restrictions on the securitys
disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar
securities of the issuer or of comparable companies, quotations
or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other
market participants, information obtained from the issuer,
analysts,
and/or the
appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an
analysis of the companys financial condition, and an
evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the
market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment
Transactions and Related Income Investment
transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for
on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments
sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest
income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted
for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
C Federal
Taxes The Funds policy is to comply
with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to
regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders
each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and
tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all
of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for
federal income or excise tax is necessary. The Fund intends to
satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate
distributions from the interest income generated by its
investments in municipal obligations, which are exempt from
regular federal income tax when received by the Fund, as
exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any,
earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7,
1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.
At November 30, 2008, the Fund, for federal income tax
purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $21,195,899 which
will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized
gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent
permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the
amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be
necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal
income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire
on November 30, 2009 ($5,266,337), November 30, 2011
($2,541,236), November 30, 2012 ($2,698,493) and
November 30, 2016 ($10,689,833).
As of May 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions
that would require financial statement recognition,
de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Funds federal
tax returns filed in the
3-year
period ended November 30, 2008 remains subject to
examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expense
Reduction State Street Bank and
Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund.
Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced
by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash
balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if
any, used to reduce the Funds custodian fees are reported
as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
E Legal
Fees Legal fees and other related expenses
incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of
capital infusions, or that are expected to
14
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONTD
result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for,
an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing
expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as
operating expenses.
F Use
of Estimates The preparation of the financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
G Indemnifications
Under the Funds organizational documents, its
officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain
liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their
duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against
personal liability for the obligations of the Fund.
Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters
into agreements with service providers that may contain
indemnification clauses. The Funds maximum exposure under
these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future
claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet
occurred.
H Floating
Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities
Held The Fund may invest in inverse floating
rate securities, also referred to as tender option bonds (TOBs),
whereby the Fund may sell a fixed rate bond to a broker for
cash. At the same time, the Fund buys a residual interest in the
assets and cash flows of a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV),
(which is generally organized as a trust), set up by the broker,
often referred to as an inverse floating rate obligation
(Inverse Floater). The broker deposits a fixed rate bond into
the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the fixed rate bond sold
to the broker by the Fund, and which may have been, but is not
required to be, the fixed rate bond purchased from the Fund (the
Fixed Rate Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes
(Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The
Inverse Floater held by the Fund gives the Fund the right
(1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to
tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the broker
transfer the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV to the Fund,
thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Fund exercise such
right, it would pay the broker the par amount due on the
Floating Rate Notes and exchange the Inverse Floater for the
underlying Fixed Rate Bond. Pursuant to Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 140, Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishment of Liabilities (FAS 140), the Fund
accounts for the transaction described above as a secured
borrowing by including the Fixed Rate Bond in its Portfolio of
Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the
caption Payable for floating rate notes issued in
its Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes
have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their
holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for
redemption at par at each reset date. Interest expense related
to the Funds liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes
is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Fund,
as noted above, or by the broker upon the occurrence of certain
termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a
downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying bond,
bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the underlying
bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have
been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the
failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement
under which liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate
Notes up to one year. Structuring fees paid to the liquidity
provider upon the creation of an SPV have been recorded as debt
issuance costs and are being amortized as interest expense to
the expected maturity date of the related trust. At May 31,
2009, the amount of the Funds Floating Rate Notes
outstanding and the related collateral were $62,460,000 and
$73,418,625, respectively. The range of interest rates on
Floating Rate Notes outstanding at May 31, 2009 was 0.30%
to 1.00%.
The Fund may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements
with the broker by which the Fund agrees to reimburse the
broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the
liquidation value of the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV and the
liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any
shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Funds exposure
under shortfall and forbearance agreements that were entered
into as of May 31, 2009 was approximately $211,000.
The Fund may also purchase Inverse Floaters from brokers in a
secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying
fixed rate bond. Such transactions are not required to be
treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any,
related to Inverse Floaters purchased in a secondary market
transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments. The
Funds investment policies and restrictions expressly
permit investments in Inverse Floaters. Inverse floating rate
securities typically offer the potential for yields exceeding
the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit
quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the
market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate
environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate
bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and
income of inverse floating rate securities are generally more
volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Funds
investment policies do not allow the Fund to borrow money for
purposes of making investments. Management believes that the
Funds restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior
securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply
to Floating Rate Notes issued by
15
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONTD
the SPV and included as a liability in the Funds Statement
of Assets and Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an
SPV, Floating Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and
senior securities to which the Funds restrictions apply.
Inverse Floaters held by the Fund are securities exempt from
registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.
I Financial
Futures Contracts The Fund may enter into
financial futures contracts. The Funds investment in
financial futures contracts is designed for hedging against
changes in interest rates or as a substitute for the purchase of
securities. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, the
Fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or
securities an amount equal to a certain percentage of the
purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as
variation margin, are made or received by the Fund each business
day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the
underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or
losses by the Fund. Gains (losses) are realized upon the
expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should
market conditions change unexpectedly, the Fund may not achieve
the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and
may realize a loss. In entering such contracts, the Fund bears
the risk if the counterparties do not perform under the
contracts terms.
J Interest
Rate Swaps The Fund may enter into interest
rate swap agreements to enhance return, to hedge against
fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates, or as
substitution for the purchase or sale of securities. Pursuant to
these agreements, the Fund makes periodic payments at a fixed
interest rate and, in exchange, receives payments based on the
interest rate of a benchmark industry index. During the term of
the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value
of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains or losses. The
value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship
between two rates of interest. The Fund is exposed to credit
loss in the event of non-performance by the swap counterparty.
Risk may also arise from movements in interest rates.
K When-Issued
Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions
The Fund may purchase or sell securities on a delayed
delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take
place after the customary settlement period for that security.
At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the
security that will be delivered is fixed. The Fund maintains
security positions for these commitments such that sufficient
liquid assets will be available to make payments upon
settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or
when-issued basis are
marked-to-market
daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may
arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying
securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the
contract.
L Statement
of Cash Flows The cash amount shown in the
Statement of Cash Flows of the Fund is the amount included in
the Funds Statement of Assets and Liabilities and
represents the cash on hand at its custodian and does not
include any short-term investments.
M Interim
Financial Statements The interim financial
statements relating to May 31, 2009 and for the six months
then ended have not been audited by an independent registered
public accounting firm, but in the opinion of the Funds
management, reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of
the financial statements.
2 Auction
Preferred Shares
The Fund issued 2,620 Series A and Series B Auction
Preferred Shares (APS) on March 1, 1999 in a public
offering. The underwriting discount and other offering costs
incurred in connection with the offering were recorded as a
reduction of the paid-in capital of the common shares. The Fund
issued 806 Series C APS on May 28, 2009 in connection
with the acquisition of Eaton Vance National Municipal Income
Trust (see Note 11). Dividends on the APS, which accrue
daily, are cumulative at rates which are reset every seven days
by an auction, unless a special dividend period has been set. If
the APS auctions do not successfully clear, the dividend payment
rate over the next period for the APS holders is set at a
specified maximum applicable rate until such time as the APS
auctions are successful. The maximum applicable rate on the APS
is 110% (150% for taxable distributions) of the greater of the
1) AA Financial Composite Commercial Paper Rate
or 2) Taxable Equivalent of the Short-Term Municipal
Obligation Rate on the date of the auction. Series of APS are
identical in all respects except for the reset dates of the
dividend rates.
During the six months ended May 31, 2009, the Fund made a
partial redemption of its APS at a liquidation price of $25,000
per share. The number of APS redeemed and redemption amount
(excluding the final dividend payment) during the six months
ended May 31, 2009 and the number of APS issued and
outstanding as of May 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APS
|
|
|
|
|
|
APS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemed
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
Issued and
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the
Period
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
4,925,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
4,925,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONTD
The APS are redeemable at the option of the Fund at a redemption
price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid
dividends, on any dividend payment date. The APS are also
subject to mandatory redemption at a redemption price equal to
$25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, if the
Fund is in default for an extended period on its asset
maintenance requirements with respect to the APS. If the
dividends on the APS remain unpaid in an amount equal to two
full years dividends, the holders of the APS as a class
have the right to elect a majority of the Board of Trustees. In
general, the holders of the APS and the common shares have equal
voting rights of one vote per share, except that the holders of
the APS, as a separate class, have the right to elect at least
two members of the Board of Trustees. The APS have a liquidation
preference of $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid
dividends. The Fund is required to maintain certain asset
coverage with respect to the APS as defined in the Funds
By-Laws and the 1940 Act. The Fund pays an annual fee equivalent
to 0.15% (0.25% prior to March 2009) of the
liquidation value of the APS to broker-dealers as a service fee
if the auctions are unsuccessful; otherwise, the annual fee is
0.25%.
3 Distributions
to Shareholders
The Fund intends to make monthly distributions of net investment
income to common shareholders, after payment of any dividends on
any outstanding APS. In addition, at least annually, the Fund
intends to distribute all or substantially all of its net
realized capital gains, (reduced by available capital loss
carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions to common
shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions
to preferred shareholders are recorded daily and are payable at
the end of each dividend period. The dividend rates for the APS
at May 31, 2009, and the amount of dividends paid
(including capital gains, if any) to APS shareholders, average
APS dividend rates (annualized), and dividend rate ranges for
the six months then ended were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APS
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
Average APS
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Rates
at
|
|
|
Paid to APS
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
May 31,
2009
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Ranges
(%)
|
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
0.56
|
%
|
|
$
|
224,391
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
0.561.76
|
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
220,318
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
0.521.72
|
|
|
Series C*
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
The Fund issued Series C APS on May 28, 2009 in
connection with the acquisition of Eaton Vance National
Municipal Income Trust (see Note 11). |
Beginning February 14, 2008 and consistent with the
patterns in the broader market for auction-rate securities, the
Funds APS auctions were unsuccessful in clearing due to an
imbalance of sell orders over bids to buy the APS. As a result,
the dividend rates of the APS were reset to the maximum
applicable rate. The table above reflects such maximum dividend
rate for each series as of May 31, 2009.
The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and
a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America require that only
distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be
reported in the financial statements as a return of capital.
Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating
to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital.
4 Investment
Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management
(EVM) as compensation for investment advisory services rendered
to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.70% of
the Funds average weekly gross assets and is payable
monthly. Average weekly gross assets include the principal
amount of any indebtedness for money borrowed, including debt
securities issued by the Fund, and the amount of any outstanding
APS issued by the Fund. Pursuant to a fee reduction agreement
with EVM, average weekly gross assets are calculated by adding
to net assets the liquidation value of the Funds APS then
outstanding and the amount payable by the Fund to floating rate
note holders, such adjustment being limited to the value of the
APS outstanding prior to any APS redemptions by the Fund. The
administration fee is earned by EVM for administering the
business affairs of the Fund and is computed at an annual rate
of 0.20% of the Funds average weekly gross assets. For the
six months ended May 31, 2009, the investment adviser fee
and administration fee were $958,637 and $273,896, respectively.
Except for Trustees of the Fund who are not members of
EVMs organization, officers and Trustees receive
remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the
investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Fund who are not
affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer
receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in
accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation
Plan. For the six months ended May 31, 2009, no significant
amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the
Fund are officers of EVM.
5 Purchases
and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term
obligations, aggregated $72,440,561 and $87,814,836,
respectively, for the six months ended May 31, 2009.
17
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONTD
6 Common
Shares of Beneficial Interest
Common share transactions for the six months ended May 31,
2009 and the year ended November 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31,
2009
|
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
November 30,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Issued pursuant to the Funds dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
|
83,616
|
|
|
|
101,741
|
|
|
|
Issued in connection with the acquisition of Eaton Vance
National Municipal Income Trust
|
|
|
5,027,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,111,222
|
|
|
|
101,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 Federal
Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
investments of the Fund at May 31, 2009, as determined on a
federal income tax basis, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost
|
|
$
|
384,713,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
6,611,435
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
(57,088,321
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation
|
|
$
|
(50,476,886
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
8 Overdraft Advances
Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT may, in its
discretion, advance funds to the Fund to make properly
authorized payments. When such payments result in an overdraft,
the Fund is obligated to repay SSBT at the current rate of
interest charged by SSBT for secured loans (currently, a rate
above the Federal Funds rate). This obligation is payable on
demand to SSBT. SSBT has a lien on the Funds assets to the
extent of any overdraft. At May 31, 2009, the Fund had a
payment due to SSBT pursuant to the foregoing arrangement of
$3,625,123.
9 Financial Instruments
The Fund may trade in financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities.
These financial instruments may include financial futures
contracts and interest rate swaps and may involve, to a varying
degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for
financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual
amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Fund
has in particular classes of financial instruments and does not
necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk.
The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments
is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions
are considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at
May 31, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Rate Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
Floating
|
|
Effective
Date/
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
Rate
|
|
Termination
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Counterparty
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Paid By
Fund
|
|
Paid To
Fund
|
|
Date
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
JPMorgan
Chase Co.
|
|
$
|
6,712,500
|
|
|
4.743%
|
|
3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
|
|
September 14, 2009/
September 14, 2039
|
|
$
|
(789,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
The effective date represents the date on which the Fund and the
counterparty to the interest rate swap contract begin interest
payment accruals.
At May 31, 2009, the Fund had sufficient cash
and/or
securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Fund adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, effective
December 1, 2008. FAS 161 requires enhanced
disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging
activities, including qualitative disclosures about the
objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative
disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on
derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk
related contingent features in derivative instruments. The
disclosure below includes additional information as a result of
implementing FAS 161.
The Fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course
of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Fund holds
fixed-rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if
interest rates rise. To hedge against this risk, the Fund may
enter into interest rate swap contracts. The Fund may also
purchase and sell U.S. Treasury futures contracts to hedge
against changes in interest rates.
The fair value of derivative instruments (not accounted for as
hedging instruments under FASB Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 133 (FAS 133)) in a liability position
and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk
at May 31, 2009 was $789,767. Such amount is included in
the following accounts on the Statement of Assets and
Liabilities: Payable for open swap contracts; Net unrealized
depreciation.
The effect of derivative instruments (not accounted for as
hedging instruments under FAS 133) on the Statement of
18
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income
Trust as
of May 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONTD
Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is
interest rate risk for the six months ended May 31, 2009
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Gain
|
|
|
Appreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) on
|
|
|
(Depreciation)
on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
Income(1)
|
|
|
Income(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
$
|
(3,602,551
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,639,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain
(loss) Financial futures contracts and swap
contracts. |
|
(2)
|
|
Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) Financial futures
contracts and swap contracts. |
The average notional amounts of futures contracts and interest
rate swaps outstanding during the six months ended May 31,
2009 were approximately $1,151,000 and $23,152,000, respectively.
10 Fair
Value Measurements
FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157
(FAS 157), Fair Value Measurements, established
a three-tier
hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs,
used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The
three-tier
hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels
listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for
identical investments
|
|
|
|
Level 2 other significant observable inputs
(including quoted prices for similar investments, interest
rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
|
|
|
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs
(including a funds own assumptions in determining the fair
value of investments)
|
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not
necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing
in those securities.
At May 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Funds
investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in
|
|
|
Other
Financial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
Inputs
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Instruments*
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Other Significant Observable Inputs
|
|
|
396,696,494
|
|
|
|
(789,767
|
)
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
396,696,494
|
|
|
$
|
(789,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Other financial instruments are swap contracts not reflected in
the Portfolio of Investments, which are valued at the unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument. |
The Fund held no investments or other financial instruments as
of November 30, 2008 whose fair value was determined using
Level 3 inputs.
11 Reorganization
Prior to the opening of business on May 28, 2009, the Fund
acquired the net assets of Eaton Vance National Municipal Income
Trust (National Trust) pursuant to an agreement and plan of
reorganization approved by the shareholders of National Trust.
The acquisition was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of
5,027,606 common shares of the Fund for the 4,260,513 common
shares of National Trust outstanding on May 27, 2009, and
806 newly-issued Series C APS of the Fund with an aggregate
liquidation value of $20,150,000 in exchange for 806 APS of
National Trust outstanding on May 27, 2009 and having the
same aggregate liquidation value. The aggregate net assets
attributable to common shares of the Fund immediately before the
acquisition were $167,134,870. The net assets attributable to
common shares of National Trust at that date of $48,359,695,
including $8,944,514 of unrealized depreciation, were combined
with those of the Fund, resulting in combined net assets
attributable to common shares of $215,494,565.
19
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited)
The Fund held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on
March 27, 2009. The following action was taken by the
shareholders:
Item 1: The election of Benjamin C. Esty,
Ronald A. Pearlman and Lynn A. Stout as Class I Trustees of
the Trust for a
three-year
term expiring in 2012 and Helen Frame Peters as Class III
Trustee of the Trust for a term expiring in 2011. Mr. Esty
was elected solely by APS shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee for
Trustee
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
|
Elected by APS
Shareholders
|
|
For
|
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty (Class I)
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees for
Trustee
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
|
Elected by All
Shareholders
|
|
For
|
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald A. Pearlman (Class I)
|
|
|
15,187,347
|
|
|
|
519,025
|
|
|
|
Lynn A. Stout (Class I)
|
|
|
15,134,510
|
|
|
|
571,862
|
|
|
|
Helen Frame Peters (Class III)
|
|
|
15,178,605
|
|
|
|
527,767
|
|
|
|
20
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited)
The Fund held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on May 15,
2009. The following action was taken by the shareholders:
Item 1: To approve the issuance of additional
common shares in connection with the Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization merging Eaton Vance National Municipal Income
Trust into Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
For
|
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,221,887
|
|
|
|
230,934
|
|
Results are rounded to the nearest whole number.
21
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
The Fund offers a dividend reinvestment plan (the Plan) pursuant
to which shareholders automatically have dividends and capital
gains distributions reinvested in common shares (the Shares) of
the Fund unless they elect otherwise through their investment
dealer. On the distribution payment date, if the net asset value
per Share is equal to or less than the market price per Share
plus estimated brokerage commissions, then new Shares will be
issued. The number of Shares shall be determined by the greater
of the net asset value per Share or 95% of the market price.
Otherwise, Shares generally will be purchased on the open market
by the Plan Agent. Distributions subject to income tax (if any)
are taxable whether or not shares are reinvested.
If your shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or
other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in
the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan,
you will need to request that your shares be re-registered in
your name with the Funds transfer agent, American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, or you will not be able
to participate.
The Plan Agents service fee for handling distributions
will be paid by the Fund. Each participant will be charged their
pro rata share of brokerage commissions on all open-market
purchases.
Plan participants may withdraw from the Plan at any time by
writing to the Plan Agent at the address noted on the following
page. If you withdraw, you will receive shares in your name for
all Shares credited to your account under the Plan. If a
participant elects by written notice to the Plan Agent to have
the Plan Agent sell part or all of his or her Shares and remit
the proceeds, the Plan Agent is authorized to deduct a $5.00 fee
plus brokerage commissions from the proceeds.
If you wish to participate in the Plan and your shares are held
in your own name, you may complete the form on the following
page and deliver it to the Plan Agent.
Any inquiries regarding the Plan can be directed to the Plan
Agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company,
at 1-866-439-6787.
22
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
APPLICATION FOR PARTICIPATION IN
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
This form is for shareholders who hold their common shares in
their own names. If your common shares are held in the name of a
brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you should contact your
nominee to see if it will participate in the Plan on your
behalf. If you wish to participate in the Plan, but your
brokerage firm, bank, or nominee is unable to participate on
your behalf, you should request that your common shares be
re-registered in your own name which will enable your
participation in the Plan.
The following authorization and appointment is given with the
understanding that I may terminate it at any time by terminating
my participation in the Plan as provided in the terms and
conditions of the Plan.
Please print exact name on account:
Shareholder
signature
Date
Shareholder
signature
Date
Please sign exactly as your common shares are registered. All
persons whose names appear on the share certificate must sign.
YOU SHOULD NOT RETURN THIS FORM IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE
YOUR DISTRIBUTIONS IN CASH. THIS IS NOT A PROXY.
This authorization form, when signed, should be mailed to the
following address:
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust
c/o American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
P.O. Box 922
Wall Street Station
New York, NY
10269-0560
Number of
Employees
The Trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended,
as a closed-end, non-diversified, management investment company
and has no employees.
Number of
Shareholders
As of May 31, 2009, our records indicate that there are 346
registered shareholders and approximately 9,092 shareholders
owning the Fund shares in street name, such as through brokers,
banks, and financial intermediaries.
If you are a street name shareholder and wish to receive Fund
reports directly, which contain important information about the
Fund, please write or call:
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
1-800-262-1122
New York
Stock Exchange symbol
The New York Stock Exchange symbol is EVN.
23
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
BOARD OF TRUSTEES ANNUAL
APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview
of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940
Act), provides, in substance, that each investment
advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser
will continue in effect from year to year only if its
continuance is approved at least annually by the funds
board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the
trustees who are not interested persons of the fund
(Independent Trustees), cast in person at a meeting
called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a
Board) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the
Eaton Vance Funds) held on April 27, 2009, the
Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted
to approve continuation of existing advisory and
sub-advisory
agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional
one-year
period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the
affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of
the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee
comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making
its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed
information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract
Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009.
Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information
about Fees, Performance and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees
paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds;
|
|
|
An independent report comparing each funds total expense
ratio and its components to comparable funds;
|
|
|
An independent report comparing the investment performance of
each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over
various time periods;
|
|
|
Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant
peer groups of funds and appropriate indices;
|
|
|
Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser
for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using
investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in
managing the fund;
|
|
|
Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each
fund;
|
Information
about Portfolio Management
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptions of the investment management services provided to
each fund, including the investment strategies and processes
employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and
personnel;
|
|
|
Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the
benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage
allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of
research through soft dollar benefits received in
connection with the funds brokerage, and the
implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program
established with respect to the funds;
|
|
|
Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund;
|
|
|
The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of
fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the
effectiveness of such procedures and processes;
|
Information
about each Adviser
|
|
|
|
|
Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each
adviser;
|
|
|
Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of
the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities
include portfolio management and investment research for the
funds, and information relating to their compensation and
responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and
investment accounts;
|
|
|
Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its
affiliates, together with information relating to compliance
with and the administration of such codes;
|
|
|
Copies of or descriptions of each advisers proxy voting
policies and procedures;
|
|
|
Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance
efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf
of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance
programs) and their record of compliance with investment
policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to
market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure,
and with policies on personal securities transactions;
|
|
|
Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery
plans of each adviser and its affiliates;
|
Other
Relevant Information
|
|
|
|
|
Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the
administrative and other non-investment management services
provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates;
|
|
|
Information concerning management of the relationship with the
custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or
the funds administrator; and
|
|
|
The terms of each advisory agreement.
|
24
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
BOARD OF TRUSTEES ANNUAL
APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY
AGREEMENT CONTD
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract
Review Committee considered information provided from time to
time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the
Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month
period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times
and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the
Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the
Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of
which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees,
met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such
meetings, the Trustees received, among other things,
presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment
professionals of each adviser relating to the investment
performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in
pursuing the funds investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios,
the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s)
when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In
addition, in cases where the funds investment adviser has
engaged a
sub-adviser,
the Board considered similar information about the
sub-adviser
when considering the approval of any
sub-advisory
agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the
contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel
for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review
Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own
business judgment in determining the material factors to be
considered in evaluating each advisory and
sub-advisory
agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The
conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and
sub-advisory
agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the
information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each
member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying
emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with
respect to each advisory and
sub-advisory
agreement.
Results
of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other
information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and
conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee
concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory
agreement between Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust (the
Fund) and Eaton Vance Management (the
Adviser), including its fee structure, is in the
interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review
Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement.
The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review
Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions
reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the
agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the
Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the
investment advisory agreement for the Fund.
Nature,
Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory
agreement of the Fund, the Board evaluated the nature, extent
and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Advisers management capabilities
and investment process with respect to the types of investments
held by the Fund, including the education, experience and number
of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide
portfolio management, investment research, and similar services
to the Fund. In particular, the Board evaluated, where relevant,
the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in
analyzing factors such as credit risk and special considerations
relevant to investing in municipal bonds. The Board considered
the Advisers large municipal bond team, which includes
portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services
to the Fund. The Board also took into account the resources
dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including
the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment
personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund by
senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser
and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board
considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal
trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of
portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio
valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment
opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the
Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory
authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative
services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its
affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services.
The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in
a fund that is a part of a large family of funds.
The Board considered the Advisers recommendations for
Board action and other steps taken in response to the
unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets
over recent periods, including sustained periods of high
volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In
particular, the Board considered the Advisers efforts and
expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they
relate to the Fund
and/or other
funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds:
(i) negotiating and maintaining the
25
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
BOARD OF TRUSTEES ANNUAL
APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY
AGREEMENT CONTD
availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit
used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs;
(ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other
instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of
market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and
(iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management
processes and risk controls. In addition, the Board considered
the Advisers actions with respect to the Auction Preferred
Shares (APS) issued by the Fund, including the
Advisers efforts to seek alternative forms of debt and
other leverage that may over time reduce financing costs
associated with APS and enable the Fund to restore liquidity for
APS holders.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the
Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services
provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and
consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Funds investment performance to a
relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an
independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The
Board reviewed comparative performance data for the
one-,
three- and
five-year
periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board
considered the impact of extraordinary market conditions during
2008 on the Funds performance relative to its peer
universe in light of, among other things, the Advisers
strategy of generating current income through investments in
higher quality (including insured) municipal bonds with longer
maturities. On the basis of the foregoing and other relevant
information, the Board concluded that, under the circumstances,
the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management
Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates,
including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Fund
(referred to collectively as management fees). As
part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and
the Funds total expense ratio for the year ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly
managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
The Board considered the financial resources committed by the
Adviser in structuring the Fund at the time of its initial
public offering. After reviewing the foregoing information, and
in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services
provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management
fees charged for advisory and related services and the
Funds total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser
and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory
and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance
Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits
realized with and without regard to revenue sharing or other
payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in
respect of distribution services. The Board also considered
other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and
its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and
the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the
profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are
reasonable.
Economies
of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also
considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates,
on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to
realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the
Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in
accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies
of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or
group of funds. The Board also considered the fact that the Fund
is not continuously offered and concluded that, in light of the
level of the advisers profits with respect to the Fund,
the implementation of breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule
is not appropriate at this time. Based upon the foregoing, the
Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are
currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its
affiliates and the Fund.
26
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES
|
|
|
Officers Robert B. MacIntosh President
William H. Ahern, Jr. Vice President
Cynthia J. Clemson Vice President
Thomas M. Metzold Vice President
Barbara E. Campbell Treasurer
Maureen A. Gemma Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
Paul M. ONeil Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
Trustees Ralph F. Verni Chairman
Benjamin C. Esty
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Allen R. Freedman
William H. Park
Ronald A. Pearlman
Helen Frame Peters
Heidi L. Steiger
Lynn A. Stout
|
27
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment
Adviser and Administrator of Eaton Vance Municipal Income
Trust
Eaton Vance
Management
Two International
Place
Boston, MA 02110
State Street
Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon
Street
Boston, MA 02116
American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
Plaza Level
New York, NY 10038
Eaton
Vance Municipal Income Trust
Two
International Place
Boston, MA
02110
Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The registrant undertakes to provide
a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling
1-800-262-1122.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrants Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit
committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is the Vice Chairman of
Commercial Industrial Finance Corp (specialty finance company). Previously, he served as President
and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) and as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (UAM)
(a holding company owning institutional investment management firms).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Not required in this filing
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed registrants
Not required in this filing.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of
this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment
Companies
The Board of Trustees of the Trust has adopted a proxy voting policy and procedure (the Fund
Policy), pursuant to which the Trustees have delegated proxy voting responsibility to the Funds
investment adviser and adopted the investment advisers proxy voting policies and procedures (the
Policies) which are described below. The Trustees will review the Funds proxy voting records
from time to time and will annually consider approving the Policies for the upcoming year. In the
event that a conflict of interest arises between the Funds shareholders and the investment
adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund, the investment
adviser will generally refrain from voting the proxies related to the companies giving rise to such
conflict until it consults with the Boards
Special Committee except as contemplated under the Fund Policy. The Boards Special Committee will
instruct the investment adviser on the appropriate course of action.
The Policies are designed to promote accountability of a companys management to its shareholders
and to align the interests of management with those shareholders. An independent proxy voting
service (Agent), currently Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., has been retained to assist
in the voting of proxies through the provision of vote analysis, implementation and recordkeeping
and disclosure services. The investment adviser will generally vote proxies through the Agent.
The Agent is required to vote all proxies and/or refer then back to the investment adviser pursuant
to the Policies. It is generally the policy of the investment adviser to vote in accordance with
the recommendation of the Agent. The Agent shall refer to the investment adviser proxies relating
to mergers and restructurings, and the disposition of assets, termination, liquidation and mergers
contained in mutual fund proxies. The investment adviser will normally vote against anti-takeover
measures and other proposals designed to limit the ability of shareholders to act on possible
transactions, except in the case of closed-end management investment companies. The investment
adviser generally supports management on social and environmental proposals. The investment
adviser may abstain from voting from time to time where it determines that the costs associated
with voting a proxy outweighs the benefits derived from exercising the right to vote or the
economic effect on shareholders interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable
or insignificant.
In addition, the investment adviser will monitor situations that may result in a conflict of
interest between the Funds shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of
their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund by maintaining a list of significant existing and
prospective corporate clients. The investment advisers personnel responsible for reviewing and
voting proxies on behalf of the Fund will report any proxy received or expected to be received from
a company included on that list to the personal of the investment adviser identified in the
Policies. If such personnel expects to instruct the Agent to vote such proxies in a manner
inconsistent with the guidelines of the Policies or the recommendation of the Agent, the personnel
will consult with members of senior management of the investment adviser to determine if a material
conflict of interests exists. If it is determined that a material conflict does exist, the
investment adviser will seek instruction on how to vote from the Special Committee.
Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent
12 month period ended June 30 is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling
1-800-262-1122, and (2) on the Securities and Exchange
Commissions website at http://www.sec.gov.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated
Purchasers.
No such purchases this period.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No Material Changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrants principal executive officer and principal financial
officer that the effectiveness of the registrants current disclosure controls and procedures (such
disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing)
provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has
been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the
Commissions rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant
has been accumulated and communicated to the registrants principal executive officer and principal
financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting
during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
|
|
|
(a)(1)
|
|
Registrants Code of Ethics Not applicable (please see Item 2). |
|
(a)(2)(i)
|
|
Treasurers Section 302 certification. |
|
(a)(2)(ii)
|
|
Presidents Section 302 certification. |
|
(b)
|
|
Combined Section 906 certification. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act
of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Robert B. MacIntosh
Robert B. MacIntosh
|
|
|
|
|
President |
|
|
|
Date: July 13, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment
Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf
of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Barbara E. Campbell
Barbara E. Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer |
|
|
Date: July 13, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Robert B. MacIntosh
Robert B. MacIntosh
|
|
|
|
|
President |
|
|
|
Date: July 13, 2009