SCHEDULE 14A

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 1)

Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

þ		Preliminary Proxy Statement
o		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o		Definitive Proxy Statement
o		Definitive Additional Materials
o		Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

Not Applicable

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ		No fee required.
o		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

	1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	2)		Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	3)		Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	4)		Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	5)		Total fee paid:

o		Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o		Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule, and the date of its filing.

	1)		Amount Previously Paid:
	2)		Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	3)		Filing Party:
	4)		Date Filed:

 

1519 PONCE DE LEON AVENUE

SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO 00908

(787) 729-8200

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

To the Stockholders of First BanCorp:

 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors and Section 2 of the Corporation’s By-laws, the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of First BanCorp will be held at our principal offices located at 1519 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico, on Tuesday, April 27, 2010, at 2:00 p.m., for the purpose of considering and taking action on the following matters, all of which are more completely set forth in the accompanying Proxy Statement:

 

1. To elect nine (9) directors, each for a term of one year expiring at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

2. To amend Article Sixth of the Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share (“Common Stock”), from 250,000,000 to 750,000,000.

 

3. To approve the issuance of shares of Common Stock in accordance with applicable New York Stock Exchange rules.

 

4. To approve a non-binding, advisory proposal on the 2009 compensation of First BanCorp’s executives.

 

5. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our 2010 fiscal year.

 

In addition, we will consider and take action on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 11, 2010 are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting. A list of such stockholders will be open to the examination of any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting, during ordinary business hours, for a period of ten days prior to the meeting, at our principal offices.

 

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. It is important that your shares be represented regardless of the number you own. Even if you plan to be present at the meeting, you are urged to complete, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy in the envelope provided. If you attend the meeting, you may vote either in person or by proxy. You may revoke any proxy that you give in writing or in person at any time prior to its exercise.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

Lawrence Odell

Secretary

 

San Juan, Puerto Rico

April [5], 2010

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

[THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

 

 

1519 Ponce De Leon Avenue
Santurce, Puerto Rico 00908

 

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of First BanCorp (the “Corporation”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Corporation’s offices located at 1519 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico, on April 27, 2010, at 2:00 p.m., and at any adjournment thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). This Proxy Statement and form of proxy are first being sent or given to stockholders of record on or about April [5], 2010. The Board of Directors has designated two individuals to serve as proxies to vote the shares represented at the Annual Meeting. Shares represented by properly executed proxies that are received will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions specified in the proxy. If you properly submit a proxy but do not give instructions on how you want your shares to be voted, your shares will be voted by the designated proxies in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations described below.

 

What information is contained in this Proxy Statement?

 

The information in this Proxy Statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, the voting process, the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board”), Board committees, the compensation of directors and executive officers and other required information.

 

What is the purpose of the Meeting?

 

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will act upon the following matters, which are outlined in the accompanying Notice of Meeting: the election of nine directors, the amendment to Article Sixth of the Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share (“Common Stock”), from 250,000,000 to 750,000,000, the issuance of shares of Common Stock in accordance with applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, the non-binding, advisory proposal on the 2009 compensation of First BanCorp’s executives, and the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as our independent registered public accounting firm for our 2010 fiscal year.

 

What should I receive?

 

You should receive this Proxy Statement, the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the proxy card and the Corporation’s 2009 annual report with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, duly certified by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

 

How many votes do I have?

 

You will have one vote for every share of Common Stock you owned as of the close of business on March 11, 2010, the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”).

 

If I am a holder of shares of Common Stock, but I did not hold my shares of Common Stock as of the Record Date, am I entitled to vote?

 

If you were not a record or beneficial holder of shares of Common Stock as of the Record Date, you will not be entitled to vote with respect to such shares.

How many votes can all stockholders cast?

 

Stockholders may cast one vote for each of the Corporation’s 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock that were outstanding on the Record Date.

 

How many votes must be present to hold the Meeting?

 

A majority of the votes that can be cast must be present either in person or by proxy to hold the Annual Meeting. Proxies received but marked as abstentions or broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether the majority of the votes that can be cast are present. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other nominee indicates on the proxy card that it does not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular matter. Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting will be counted by Bank of New York Mellon, an independent third party. We urge you to vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting so that we will know as soon as possible that enough votes will be present for us to hold the Annual Meeting.

 

What vote is required and how are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

 

To be elected, directors must receive a majority of the votes of the stockholders represented in person or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes cast AGAINST and broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessary for approval.

 

Action with respect to the proposal to amend Article Sixth of the Restated Articles of Incorporation requires the approval of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have the same effect as votes cast against the proposed amendment and issuance.

 

Proposal No. 3 relating to the issuance of shares of Common Stock in accordance with applicable New York Stock Exchange rules requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast on such proposal, provided that the total votes cast on the proposal, whether for or against, represent over 50% of all of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the number of votes cast.

 

As to the advisory vote related to executive compensation and the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm, and any other item voted upon at the Annual Meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on each item will be required for approval. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes cast against the proposals and broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessary for approval.

 

Can my broker vote my shares for me on the election of directors?

 

No. Please note that this year the rules that govern how brokers vote your shares have changed. Brokers may no longer use discretionary authority to vote shares on the election of directors if they have not received instructions from their clients. Please vote your proxy so your vote can be counted.

 

How does the Board recommend that I vote?

 

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each nominee to the Board; FOR the amendment to Article Sixth of the Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of Common Stock from 250,000,000 to 750,000,000; FOR the issuance of shares of Common Stock in accordance with applicable New York Stock Exchange rules; FOR the advisory vote related to executive compensation; and FOR the ratification of the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2010.

 

How do I vote?

 

You can vote either in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy without attending the Annual Meeting.

To vote by proxy, you must either:

 

 

Please refer to the specific instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card. For security reasons, our electronic voting system has been designed to authenticate your identity as a Shareholder.

 

If you hold your shares in “street name,” your broker/bank/trustee/nominee will provide you with materials and instructions for voting your shares.

 

Can I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?

 

If you are a “shareholder of record,” you may vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in “street name,” you must obtain a proxy from your broker, banker, trustee or nominee, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting.

 

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

 

Most of our stockholders hold their shares through a broker, bank, or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some differences between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

 

Stockholder of Record.  If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, The Bank of New York Mellon Shareowner Services, LLC, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice or these proxy materials are being sent directly to you. As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote via the Internet, by telephone, or by completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card.

 

Beneficial Owner.  If your shares are held by a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice or these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee who is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee on how to vote the shares held in your account, and it will enclose or provide voting instructions for you to use in directing it on how to vote your shares. The organization that holds your shares, however, is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, because you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting.

 

Who will bear the costs of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting?

 

We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting. In addition to solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited personally, by telephone or otherwise. The Board has engaged the firm of Morrow & Co., LLC to aid in the solicitation of proxies. The cost is estimated at $6,500, plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. Our Directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies but will not receive any additional compensation for their services. Proxies and proxy materials will also be distributed at our expense by brokers, nominees, custodians and other similar parties.

 

Can I change my vote?

 

Yes, you may change your vote. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by sending in a new proxy card with a later date, or casting a new vote by telephone or over the Internet, or sending a written notice of revocation to the President or Secretary of First BanCorp, at P.O. Box 9146, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00908-0146, delivered before the proxy is exercised. If you attend the Annual Meeting and want to vote in person, you may request that your previously submitted proxy not be used. If your shares are held in

the name of a broker, bank or other holder of record, that institution will instruct you as to how your vote may be changed.

 

What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting materials?

 

You may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this Proxy Statement and multiple proxy cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate proxy card for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card that you receive.

 

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

 

The Board does not intend to present any business at the Annual Meeting other than that described in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Board at this time knows of no other matters that may come before the Annual Meeting and the Chairman of the Annual Meeting will declare out of order and disregard any matter not properly presented. However, if any new matter requiring the vote of the stockholders is properly presented before the Annual Meeting, proxies may be voted with respect thereto in accordance with the best judgment of the proxy holders, under the discretionary power granted by stockholders to their proxies in connection with general matters.

 

What happens if the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned?

 

Your proxy will still be valid and may be voted at the postponed or adjourned meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is voted.

 

Who can help answer my questions?

 

If you have any questions about how to grant or revoke your vote or need copies of our filings, you should contact Lawrence Odell, Secretary of the Board of Directors, at 787-729-8109 or at lawrence.odell@firstbankpr.com.

 

This Proxy Statement and the 2009 annual report to security holders are available at http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/fbp. You may obtain directions to be able to attend the meeting and vote in person by contacting Lawrence Odell, Secretary of the Board of Directors, by e-mail at lawrence.odell@firstbankpr.com or by telephone at 787-729-8109.

 

The following tables sets forth certain information as of January 15, 2010 with respect to shares of our Common Stock and preferred stock beneficially owned (unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes) by: (1) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Stock; (2) each director, each director nominee and each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement (the “Named Executive Officers”); and (3) all directors and executive officers as a group. This information has been provided by each of the directors and executive officers at our request or derived from statements filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Beneficial ownership of securities, as shown below, has been determined in accordance with applicable guidelines issued by the SEC. Beneficial ownership includes the possession, directly or indirectly, through any formal or informal arrangement, either individually or in a group, of voting power (which includes the power to vote, or to

direct the voting of, such security) and/or investment power (which includes the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, such security).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The composition of our Board of Directors changed in various respects during 2009. Effective September 28, 2009, Mr. Luis Beauchamp-Rodríguez resigned as President, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), director and Chairman of the Board. Immediately thereafter, the Board appointed Mr. José Menéndez-Cortada, previously Lead Independent Director, to serve as non-executive Chairman of the Board. Effective May 19, 2009, Mr. José Teixidor resigned as a director. On October 27, 2009 at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board, the Board resolved to reduce the number of Board seats from eleven (11) to nine (9). Accordingly, nine (9) nominees are standing for election as director.

 

Our By-laws provide that the Board of Directors of the Corporation will consist of a number of members fixed from time to time by resolution of a majority of the Board, provided that the number of directors is always an odd number and not less than five nor more than fifteen. The Board currently has nine members. In accordance with our Restated Articles of Incorporation and By-laws, director nominees stand for election annually. The individuals elected serve for one-year terms expiring at the 2011 Annual Meeting and, with respect to each director, until his or her successor is elected and qualified. If stockholders do not elect a nominee who is serving as a director, Puerto Rico corporation law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” Under our Bylaws, an incumbent director who is not elected by a majority of the required votes must tender his or her resignation to the Board promptly following certification of the stockholder vote. The Board must act on the tendered resignation within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote and must take action with respect to the vacancy on the Board in accordance with the vacancy provision of the By-laws, which states that any director elected by an affirmative vote of the majority of the Board to fill a vacancy will serve until the next election of directors by stockholders.

 

Our retirement policy for the Board states that directors who reach the age of 70 may continue to serve until the end of the term to which they were elected, but will not be eligible to stand for re-election.

 

Unless otherwise directed, each proxy executed and returned by a stockholder will be voted FOR the election of the nominees listed below. If any nominee should be unable or unwilling to stand for election at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will nominate and vote for the replacement nominee or nominees as the Board may propose. At this time, the Board knows of no reason why any of the persons listed below may not be able to serve as a director if elected. On February 22, 2010, the Board approved the inclusion of the nominees on our 2010 Annual Meeting proxy card.

 

The members of the Board are also the members of the Board of Directors of FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank” or the “Bank”). The information presented below regarding the time of service on the Board includes terms concurrently served on the Board of Directors of the Bank.

 

 

The Board nominees each have the qualifications and experience to focus on the complex issues confronting us and the financial industry. Our Board consists of individuals with the skills, experience and backgrounds necessary to enhance our ability to solve problems arising in connection with the current economic environment and the complex financial and regulatory issues that we face.

 

The nominees listed below are leaders in business, finance, accounting and academia because of their intellectual acumen and analytic skills, strategic vision, ability to lead and inspire others to work with them, and records of outstanding accomplishments over a period of decades. Each has been chosen to stand for election in part because of his or her ability and willingness to ask difficult questions, understand our unique challenges and evaluate the strategies proposed by management, as well as their implementation.

 

Each of the nominees has a long record of professional integrity, dedication to his or her profession and community, a strong work ethic that includes coming fully prepared to meetings and being willing to spend the time and effort needed to fulfill professional obligations, the ability to maintain a collegial environment, and the experience of having served as a director of the Corporation and other companies.

In evaluating the composition of the Board, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee seeks to find and retain individuals who, in addition to having the qualifications set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Principles, have the skills, experience and abilities necessary to oversee our operations in the corporate and consumer businesses within Puerto Rico, the United States and the United States and British Virgin Islands. This Committee has determined it is critically important to our proper operation and success that our Board has expertise and experience in the following areas:

 

 

Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, 51
President and Chief Executive Officer

 

President and Chief Executive Officer since September 2009. Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from October 2005 to September 2009. Executive Vice President responsible for consumer banking and auto financing of FirstBank between 1998 and 2009. Since April 2005, also responsible for the retail banking distribution network, First Mortgage and FistBank Virgin Islands operations. President of First Federal Finance Corporation d/b/a Money Express from 2000 to 2005. President of FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc. from 2001 to 2005. President of First Leasing & Rental Corp. from 1999 to June 2007. From 1996 to 1998, Vice President of CitiBank, N.A., responsible for wholesale and retail automobile financing and retail mortgage business. Vice President of Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., responsible for banking operations and technology for Puerto Rico and the Eastern Caribbean region from 1990 to 1996. Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO of First Leasing and Rental Corporation, First Federal Finance Corporation d/b/a Money Express, FirstMortgage, Inc., FirstBank Overseas Corp., First Insurance Agency, Inc., FirstExpress, Inc., FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities Corp., and First Management of Puerto Rico, and CEO of FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc., Grupo Empresas Servicios Financieros, First Trade, Inc. and First Resolution Company. Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Ponce General Corporation and FirstBank Florida until July 2009. Joined the Corporation in 1998. Director of First BanCorp and FirstBank Puerto Rico since September 2005.

 

Director Qualifications:

 

 

Jorge L. Díaz-Irizarrry, 55

 

Executive Vice President and member of the Board of Directors of Empresas Díaz, Inc. from 1981 to present, and Executive Vice President and Director of Betteroads Asphalt Corporation, Betterecycling Corporation, and Coco Beach Development Corporation, and its subsidiaries. Member of the Chamber of Commerce of Puerto Rico, the Association of General Contractors of Puerto Rico and the U.S. National Association of General Contractors; member of the Board of Trustees of Baldwin School of Puerto Rico. Director since 1998.

 

Director Qualifications:

 

 

 

José L. Ferrer-Canals, 50

 

Doctor of Medicine in private urology practice since 1992. Commissioned captain in the United States Air Force Reserve March 1991. Honorably discharged with rank of Major in 2005. Member of the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society since induction in 1986. Member of the Board of Directors of the American Cancer Society, Puerto Rico Chapter, from 1999 to 2003. Member of the Board of Directors of the American Red Cross, Puerto Rico Chapter, from 2005 to November 2009. Obtained a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of New Orleans, of the Louisiana State University System, on September 2007. Member of the Board of Directors of Aspenall Energies, a privately-held company dedicated to the installation and management of alternative energy projects, since February 2009. Director of Global Petroleum Environmental Technologies of Puerto Rico Crop. (GPET), a privately-held company dedicated to soil and ground water contamination remediation since February 2010. Director since 2001.

 

Director Qualifications:

 

 

Frank Kolodziej-Castro, 65

 

President and Chief Executive Officer of Centro Tomográfico de Puerto Rico, Inc. since 1978; Somascan, Inc. since 1983; Instituto Central de Diagnóstico, Inc. since 1991; Advanced Medical Care, Inc. since 1994; Somascan Plaza, Inc. and PlazaMED, Inc. since 1997; International Cyclotrons, Inc. since 2004; and Somascan Cardiovascular since January 2007, all of which are related entities. Pioneer in the Caribbean in the areas of Computerized Tomography (CT), Digital Angiography (DSA), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and PET/CT-16 (Positron Emission Tomography). Mr. Kolodziej was previously a member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation from 1988 to 1993 and has been a Director since July 2007.

 

Director Qualifications:

 

 

José Menéndez-Cortada, 62
Chairman of the Board

 

A graduate of the Boston College Carroll School of Management with a Major in Finance. Upon obtaining his Juris Doctor degree from the InterAmerican University School of Law, in Puerto Rico, he commenced work in the Tax Department of Price Waterhouse LLP (“PW”). While at PW, he took a leave of absence to pursue a Masters in Law (in taxation) at the NYU Law School. He returned to the firm and worked as a Tax Manager until 1976. In 1977 he joined a legal partnership, which is now a professional service corporation operating under the name of Martínez-Alvarez, Menéndez-Cortada & Lefranc-Romero, PSC. Until 2009, he was the director and vice president in charge of the corporate and tax divisions. The firm is a full service firm specializing in Commercial, Real Estate and Construction Law. He has served as Counsel to the Board of Bermudez & Longo, S.E. since 1985, director of Tasis

Dorado School since 2002, director of the Homebuilders Association of Puerto Rico since 2002, trustee of the Luis A. Ferré Foundation, Inc. (Ponce Museum) since 2002 and co-chairman of the audit committee of that foundation since 2009. Among his past experiences are his services as treasurer and president of USO of Puerto Rico and later as Chairman for the Caribbean. For more than 15 years, he has served as ad honorem professor of continuous education in the local CPA Association. Director since April 2004. Served as Lead Independent Director between February 2006 and September 2009. Chairman of the Board of Directors since September 2009.

 

Director Qualifications:

 

 

Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa, 59

 

President and CEO of Suiza Dairy, a PR Dairy processor from 1982 to 1998, having served in additional executive capacities there since 1973. Member of the Board of Directors of Dean Foods Co. since 1995, where he also serves on the Audit Committee. Mr Nevares is also a Board member of V. Suarez &Co., a local food distributor, and Suiza Realty SE, a local housing developer. He has also served on the boards of The PR Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (1989-1993) and Indulac (1982-2002). In the non-profit sector, he is a Board member of Caribbean Preparatory School and Corporación para el Desarrollo de la Península de Cantera. He holds a BS in Finance from Boston College and a Law Degree from the University of PR. He previously served on the Board of Directors of FirstBank from 1993 to 2002 and has been a Director since July 2007.

 

Director Qualification:

 

 

Fernando Rodríguez-Amaro, 61

 

Certified Public Accountant, Certified Fraud Examiner, Certified Valuation Analyst and Certified Financial Forensics. Managing Partner and Partner in Charge of the Audit and Accounting Division of RSM ROC & Company. Has been with RSM ROC & Company for the past twenty-nine years and prior thereto served as Audit Manager with Arthur Andersen & Co. for over nine years, from June 1971 to October 1980. Mr. Rodríguez Amaro has over 38 years of public accounting experience. He has served clients in the banking, insurance, manufacturing, construction, government, advertising, radio broadcasting and services industries. Member of the Board of Trustees of Sacred Heart University of Puerto Rico since August 2003, serving as member of the Executive Committee and Chairman of the Audit Committee since 2004. Member of the Board of Trustees of Colegio Puertorriqueño de Niñas

since 1996, and also as a member of the Board of Directors from 1998 to 2004 and since late 2008 and, member of the Board of Directors of Proyecto de Niños de Nueva Esperanza, Inc. since 2003. Director since November 2005.

 

Director Qualifications:

 

 

José F. Rodríguez-Perelló, 60

 

President of L&R Investments, Inc., a privately owned local investment company, from May 2005 to present; Vice-Chairman and member of the Board of Directors of the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico from March 2005 to December 2006. Member of the Board of Directors of “Fundación Chana & Samuel Levis” from 1998 to 2007. Partner, Executive Vice-president and member of the Board of Directors of Ledesma & Rodríguez Insurance Group, Inc. from 1990 to 2005. President of Prudential Bache PR, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiary of then existing Prudential Bache Group, from 1980 to 1990. Director since July 2007.

 

Director Qualification:

 

 

 

Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi, 50

 

Doctor of Medicine. Associate Professor at the University of Puerto Rico’s Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology since 1993. Director of the Division of Gynecologic Oncology of the University of Puerto Rico’s School of Medicine since 1993. Board Certified by the National Board of Medical Examiners, American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology. Director since 2003.

 

Director Qualifications:

 

 

 

 

Required Vote

 

To be elected, each director must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes of the stockholders represented in person or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors.

 

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

 

     THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH INDIVIDUAL NOMINATED TO SERVE AS A DIRECTOR.

 

The executive officers of the Corporation and FirstBank who are not directors are listed below.

 

Orlando Berges-González, 52
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation since August 1, 2009. Mr. Berges-González has over 30 years of experience in the financial, administration, public accounting and business sectors. Prior to joining the Corporation, Mr. Berges-González served as Executive Vice President of Administration of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico from May 2004 until May 2009. Was responsible for supervising the finance, operations, real estate, and administration functions in both Puerto Rico and U.S. markets. Mr. Berges-González also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial, Operations and Administration Officer of Banco Popular North America from January 1998 to September 2001, and as Regional Manager of a branch network of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico from October 2001 to April 2004. Mr. Berges-González is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and of the Puerto Rico Society of Certified Public Accountants. Director of First Leasing and Rental Corporation, First Federal Finance Corporation d/b/a Money Express, FirstMortgage, FirstBank Overseas Cop., First Insurance Agency, Inc., First Express, Inc., FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities Corp., First Management of Puerto Rico, and FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc., Grupo Empresas Servicios Financieros, and First Resolution Company.

 

Calixto García-Vélez, 42
Executive Vice President, Florida Region Executive

 

Mr. García-Vélez has been Executive Vice President and FirstBank Florida Regional Executive since March 2009. Mr. García-Vélez was most recently President and CEO of Doral Bank and EVP and President of the Consumer Banking Division of Doral Financial Corp in Puerto Rico. He was a member of Doral Bank’s Board of Directors. He held those positions from September 2006 to November 2008. Previous to this, Mr. García-Vélez served as President of West Division of Citibank, N.A., responsible for the Bank’s businesses in California and Nevada from 2005 to August 2006. From 2003 to 2006 he served as Business Manager for Citibank’s South Division where he was responsible for Florida, Texas, Washington D.C., Virginia, Maryland and Puerto Rico. Mr. García-Vélez had served as President of Citibank, Florida from 1999 to 2003. During his tenure, he served on the Boards of Citibank F.S.B. and Citibank West, F.S.B.

 

Ginoris Lopez-Lay, 41
Executive Vice President and Retail and Banking Executive

 

Graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a bachelor degree in Economics and a MBA from the University of Michigan. Her professional trajectory started in 1989 as a Financial Analyst of the Finance and Strategic Planning Group in Banco Popular de Puerto Rico. She was later promoted to Vice President of Strategic Planning and then as a Senior Vice President and Manager of the Strategic Planning and Marketing Division. Member of the Board of Directors (since 2001) and Vice Chairman (since 2005) of the Center for the New Economy, and was advisor to the Board of Trustees of the Sacred Heart University from 2003 to 2004. Joined First BanCorp in 2006 as Senior Vice President, leading the Retail Financial Services Division and establishing the Strategic Planning Department. Executive Vice President of Retail and Business Banking Division since March 2010.

Emilio Martinó-Valdés, 59
Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer

 

Chief Lending Officer and Executive Vice President of FirstBank since October 2005. Senior Vice President and Credit Risk Manager of FirstBank from June 2002 to October 2005. Staff Credit Executive for FirstBank’s Corporate and Commercial Banking business components since November 2004. First Senior Vice President of Banco Santander Puerto Rico; Director for Credit Administration, Workout and Loan Review, from 1997 to 2002. Senior Vice President for Risk Area in charge of Workout, Credit Administration, and Portfolio Assessment for Banco Santander Puerto Rico from 1996 to 1997. Deputy Country Senior Credit Officer for Chase Manhattan Bank Puerto Rico from 1986 to 1991. Director of First Mortgage, Inc. since October 2009. Director of FirstBank Florida from August 2006 until July 2009.

 

Lawrence Odell, 61
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since February 2006. Senior Partner at Martínez Odell & Calabria since 1979. Has over 26 years of experience in specialized legal issues related to banking, corporate finance and international corporate transactions. Served as Secretary of the Board of Pepsi-Cola Puerto Rico, Inc. from 1992 to 1997. Served as Secretary to the Board of Directors of BAESA, S.A. from 1992 to 1997. Director of FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities Corp., First Management of Puerto Rico, and First Resolution Company since March 2009.

 

Cassan Pancham, 49
Executive Vice President and Eastern Caribbean Region Executive

 

Executive Vice President of FirstBank since October 2005. First Senior Vice President, Eastern Caribbean Region of FirstBank from October 2002 until October 2005. Director and President of FirstExpress, Inc., and First Insurance Agency, Inc since 2005 Director of FirstMortgage since February 2010. He held the following positions at JP Morgan Chase Bank Eastern Caribbean Region Banking Group: Vice President and General Manager from December 1999 to October 2002; Vice President, Business, Professional and Consumer Executive from July 1998 to December 1999; Deputy General Manager from March 1999 to December 1999; and Vice President, Consumer Executive, from December 1997 to 1998. Member of the Governing Board of Directors of the Virgin Islands Port Authority since June 2007 and Chairman since January 2008.

 

Dacio A. Pasarell-Colón, 61
Executive Vice President and Banking Operations Executive

 

Executive Vice President and Banking Operations Executive since September 2002. Had over 27 years of experience at Citibank N.A. in Puerto Rico, which included the following positions: Vice President, Retail Bank Manager, from 2000 to 2002; Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1996 to 1998; Vice President, Head of Operations — Caribbean Countries from 1994 to 1996; Vice President Mortgage and Automobile Financing; Product Manager, Latin America from 1986 to 1994; Vice President, Mortgage and Automobile Financing Product Manager for Puerto Rico from 1986 to 1996. President of Citiseguros PR, Inc. from 1998 to 2001. Chairman of Ponce General Corporation and Director of FirstBank Florida from April 2005 until July 2009.

 

Nayda Rivera-Batista, 36
Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer and Assistant Secretary of the Board of Directors

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer since April 2006 and promoted to Executive Vice President in January 2008. Senior Vice President and General Auditor from July 2002 to April 2006. She is a Certified Public Accountant, Certified Internal Auditor and Certified in Financial Forensics. With more than 14 years of combined work experience in public company, auditing, accounting, financial reporting, internal controls, corporate governance, risk management and regulatory compliance. Served as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Bayamón Central University from January 2005 to January 2006. Joined the Corporation in 2002. Director of FirstMortgage, FirstBank Overseas Corp., and FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities Corp since October 2009.

Randolfo Rivera-Sanfeliz, 56
Executive Vice President and Wholesale Banking Executive

 

Executive Vice President in charge of the corporate banking, government and institutional, structure finance and cash management areas of FirstBank since June 1998 and since October 2005 also in charge of real estate lending, and commercial mortgage lending. Recently was given the responsibility over FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities and the Floor Plan unit in Puerto Rico. Vice President and component executive for local companies, public sector and institutional markets for Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. in Puerto Rico from April 1990 to December 1996. Corporate Finance Executive in charge of the Caribbean and Central American region for Chase Manhattan Bank in Puerto Rico from January 1997 to May 1998. Director of FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities Corp since October 2009.

 

Víctor M. Barreras-Pellegrini, 41
Senior Vice President and Treasurer

 

Senior Vice President and Treasurer since July 6, 2006. Previously held various positions with Banco Popular de Puerto Rico from January 1992 to June 2006, including Fixed-Income Portfolio Manager of the Popular Assets Management division from 1998 to 2006 and Investment Officer in the Treasury division from 1995 to 1998. Director of FirstBank Overseas Corp. and First Mortgage since August 2006. He has over 16 years of experience in banking and investments and holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation. Joined the Corporation in 2006.

 

Pedro Romero-Marrero, 36
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since August 2006. Senior Vice President and Comptroller from May 2005 to August 2006. Vice President and Assistant Comptroller from December 2002 to May 2005. He is a Certified Public Accountant with a Master of Science in Accountancy and has technical expertise in management reporting, financial analysis, corporate tax, internal controls and compliance with US GAAP, SEC rules and Sarbanes Oxley. He has more than eleven years of experience in accounting including big four public accounting company, banking and financial services. Joined the Corporation in December 2002.

 

The Corporation’s By-laws provide that each officer shall be elected annually at the first meeting of the Board of Directors after the annual meeting of stockholders and that each officer shall hold office until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified or until his or her death, resignation or removal from office.

 

The following discussion summarizes various corporate governance matters including director independence, board and committee structure, function and composition, and governance charters, policies and procedures. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Principles, the charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Benefits Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Credit Committee, the Asset/Liability Committee, and the Strategic Planning Committee, the Corporation’s Code of Ethical Conduct, the Corporation’s Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers and the Independence Principles for Directors are available through our web site at www.firstbankpr.com, under “Investor Relations / Governance Documents.” Our stockholders may obtain printed copies of these documents by writing to Lawrence Odell, Secretary of the Board of Directors, at First BanCorp, 1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00908.

 

In October 2008, we adopted a new Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers (the “Code”). The Code applies to each officer of the Corporation or its affiliates having any or all of the following responsibilities and/or authority, regardless of formal title: the president, the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, the

chief accounting officer, the controller, the treasurer, the tax manager, the general counsel, the general auditor, any assistant general counsel responsible for finance matters, any assistant controller and any regional or business unit financial officer. The Code states the principles to which senior financial officers must adhere in order to act in a manner consistent with the highest moral and ethical standards. The Code imposes a duty to avoid conflicts of interest and to comply with the laws and regulations that apply to the Corporation and its subsidiaries, among other matters. Only the Board, or a duly authorized committee of the Board, may grant waivers from compliance with this Code. Any waiver of any part of the Code will be promptly disclosed to stockholders on our website at www.firstbankpr.com. Neither the Audit Committee nor the General Counsel received any requests for waivers under the Code in 2009.

 

We also adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct that is applicable to all employees and Directors of the Corporation and all of its subsidiaries, which is designed to maintain a high ethical culture in the Corporation. The Code of Ethical Conduct addresses, among other matters, conflicts of interest, operational norms and confidentiality of our and our customers’ information.

 

The Board annually evaluates the independence of its members based on the criteria for determining independence identified by the NYSE, the SEC and our Independence Principles for Directors. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Principles requires that a majority of the Board be composed of directors who meet the requirements for independence established in our Independence Principles for Directors, which incorporates the independence requirements established by the NYSE and the SEC. The Board has concluded that the Corporation has a majority of independent directors. The Board has determined that Messrs. José L. Ferrer-Canals, Jorge L. Díaz- Irizarry, Fernando Rodríguez-Amaro, José Menéndez-Cortada, Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi, Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa, Frank Kolodziej-Castro and José Rodríguez-Perelló are independent under the Independence Principles for Directors, taking into account the matters discussed under “Certain Transactions and Related Person Transactions.”

 

Mr. Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, President and Chief Executive Officer since September 28, 2009 and previously Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, is not considered to be independent as he is a management Board member. During 2009, the independent directors usually met in executive sessions without management present on days when there were regularly scheduled Board meetings. In addition, non-management directors separately met seven times during 2009 with José Menéndez-Cortada, Chairman of the Board since September 28, 2009 and previously Lead Independent Director, serving as chairman during the meetings.

 

We currently have an independent chairman separate from the chief executive officer. The Board believes it is important to maintain flexibility in its board leadership structure and has had in place different leadership structures over the past few years, depending on our needs at the time. Nevertheless, it firmly supports having an independent director in a board leadership position at all times. Accordingly, our Board adopted corporate policies that provide that, if we do not have an independent chairman, the Board must elect a lead independent director, having similar duties to an independent chairman, including leading the executive sessions of the non-management directors at Board meetings. At this time, our chairman provides independent leadership of the Board. Having an independent chairman or lead director enables non-management directors to raise issues and concerns for Board consideration without immediately involving management. The independent chairman or lead director also serves as a liaison between the Board and senior management. Our Board has determined that the current structure, an independent chair separate from the chief executive officer, is the most appropriate structure at this time, while ensuring that, at all times, there will be an independent director in a board leadership position.

 

The Board oversees our enterprise risk management framework through the Audit Committee, the Credit Committee, the Asset/Liability Committee, the Strategic Planning Committee and the Compensation and Benefits

Committee. Each one of the Board designated committees has a distinct charter and role within the governance and risk management hierarchy of the Corporation. The charters, which are posted on our website, define the roles and responsibilities of the committee’s members, responsibility for risk oversight, and specify relationships among the committees, the Board and management.

 

The Credit Committee oversees our policies and procedures related to the Bank’s lending function. The Asset/Liability Committee oversees our policies and procedures related to our asset and liability management relating to (i) funds management, (ii) investment management, (iii) liquidity, (iv) interest rate risk management, (v) capital adequacy, and (vi) the use of derivatives. The Audit Committee oversees other risk management processes mainly related to compliance, operations, our internal audit function, and our external financial reporting and internal control over financial reporting process. The Strategic Planning Committee assists and advises management with respect to, and monitors and oversees on behalf of the Board, corporate development activities not in the ordinary course of our business and strategic alternatives under consideration from time to time by the Corporation, including, but not limited to, acquisitions, mergers, alliances, joint ventures, divestitures, capitalization of the Corporation and other similar corporate transactions. The Compensation and Benefits Committee reviews compensation programs to ensure that they do not, among other things, encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking.

 

In addition, the Board receives periodically from the chief risk officer a risk report with respect to our approach to management of major risks, including management’s risk mitigation efforts, where appropriate. Enterprise Risk Management, led by the chief risk officer, and managed through the Risk Management Council (the “Council”), is a corporation-wide function that is responsible for an integrated effort to identify, assess and manage risks that may affect our ability to execute our corporate strategy and fulfill our business objectives. The Council is appointed by our Chief Executive Officer to assist us in overseeing, and receiving information regarding, our policies, procedures and related practices relating to the Corporation’s risks. As requested by the Board, the Council has a dotted reporting line to the Credit Committee, the Asset/Liability Committee and the Audit Committee to ensure that our risk management process as a whole is of the proper scope and functioning effectively. The Council’s primary general functions involve:

 

 

The Board’s role is to oversee this effort, recognizing that management is responsible for executing our risk management policies. In performing this function, the Board receives periodic reports from the Board designated committees and different members of senior management.

 

The Board believes that appropriate stock ownership by directors further aligns their interests with those of our stockholders. Accordingly, in August 2007, the Board adopted Director Stock Ownership Requirement Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) for all non-management directors, which became effective upon adoption. Non-management directors are expected to hold an investment position in our Common Stock having a cost basis, except as described below, equivalent to at least $250,000. Shares of Common Stock owned by the non-management directors upon the adoption of the Guidelines were considered for purposes of compliance. In this respect, the amount of shares of Common Stock owned by the non-management directors was valued at the greater of the historical cost or the market value at the close of the market on August 28, 2007, the date the Guidelines were adopted. Upon meeting the ownership goal, that number of shares, considering stock split adjustments, becomes fixed and must be maintained until the end of the director’s service on the Board. Directors are required to achieve the ownership goal within three

years after the later of the Board’s adoption of the Guidelines or the director’s appointment to the Board. In reaching the ownership requirement, annual investments are expected to be made in equal proportions throughout the three-year period. The Guidelines are administrated by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board. The Committee has the discretion to submit for approval by the Board and the Board may at any time approve amendments or modifications to the Guidelines.

 

Stockholders or other interested parties who wish to communicate with the Board may do so by writing to the Chairman of the Board in care of the Office of the Corporate Secretary at the Corporation’s headquarters, 1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00908 or by e-mail to directors@firstbankpr.com. Communications may also be made by calling the following telephone number: 1-787-729-8109. Communications related to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be referred to the Chair of the Audit Committee. Depending upon the nature of other concerns, it may be referred to our Internal Audit Department, the Legal or Finance Department, or any other appropriate department. As they deem necessary or appropriate, the Chairman of the Board or the Chair of the Audit Committee may direct that certain concerns communicated to them be presented to the Audit Committee or the Board, or that they receive special treatment, including through the retention of outside counsel or other outside advisors.

 

The Board is responsible for directing and overseeing the business and affairs of the Corporation. The Board represents the Corporation’s stockholders and its primary purpose is to build long-term stockholder value. The Board meets on a regularly scheduled basis during the year to review significant developments affecting the Corporation and to act on matters that require Board approval. It also holds special meetings when an important matter requires Board action between regularly scheduled meetings. The Board met nineteen (19) times during fiscal year 2009. Each member of the Board participated in at least 75% of the Board meetings held during fiscal year 2009. While we have not adopted a formal policy with respect to directors’ attendance at annual meetings of stockholders, we encourage our directors to attend such meetings. All of the Corporation’s directors attended the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders.

 

The Board has six standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Benefits Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Asset/Liability Committee, the Credit Committee and the Strategic Planning Committee. In addition, from time to time and as it deems appropriate, the Board may also establish ad-hoc committees, which are to be created for a one-time purpose to focus on examining a specific subject or matter. These ad-hoc committees are to be created with a deadline by which they must complete their work, or will expire. The only current ad-hoc committee is the Capital Committee. The members of the committees are appointed and removed by the Board, which also appoints a chair for each committee. The functions of those committees, their current members and the number of meetings held during 2009 are set forth below. Each member of the Board participated in at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he/she served (during the periods that he/she served) during fiscal year 2009.

 

The Audit Committee charter provides that this Committee is to be composed of at least three outside directors who meet the independence criteria established by the NYSE, the SEC and our Independence Principles for Directors.

 

As set forth in the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee represents and assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee management regarding (i) the conduct and integrity of our financial reporting to any governmental or regulatory body, shareholders, other users of our financial reports and the public; (ii) the performance of our internal audit function; (iii) our systems of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures; (iv) the qualifications, engagement, compensation, independence and

performance of our independent auditors, their conduct of the annual audit of our financial statements, and their engagement to provide any other services; (v) our legal and regulatory compliance; (vi) the application of our related person transaction policy as established by the Board; (vii) the application of our codes of business conduct and ethics as established by management and the Board; and (viii) the preparation of the audit committee report required to be included in our annual proxy statement by the rules of the SEC.

 

The current members of this Committee are Messrs. Fernando Rodríguez-Amaro, Chairman since January 2006, José Ferrer-Canals and Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa. Each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate, knowledgeable and qualified to review financial statements. The “audit committee financial expert” designated by the Board is Fernando Rodríguez-Amaro. The Audit Committee met a total of twenty-two (22) times during 2009.

 

In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Corporation’s independent registered public accountants. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent accountants the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Finally, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, has considered whether the provision of non-audit services by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Corporation is compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accountants its independence from the Corporation and its management. These considerations and discussions, however, do not assure that the audit of the Corporation’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, that the financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States or that the Corporation’s registered public accountants are in fact “independent.”

 

The members of the Audit Committee are not engaged professionally in rendering, auditing or accounting services on behalf of the Corporation nor are they employees of the Corporation. The Audit Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided and on the representations made by management regarding the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, that the financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and that such financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Audit Committee also relies on the opinions of the independent auditors on the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

 

Based on the Audit Committee’s consideration of the audited financial statements and the discussions referred to above with management and the independent registered public accountants, and subject to the limitations on the role and responsibilities of the Audit Committee set forth in the Charter and those discussed above, the Committee recommended to the Board that the Corporation’s audited financial statements be included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for filing with the SEC.

 

This report is provided by the following independent directors who comprised the Committee at the date of the recommendation:

 

Fernando Rodríguez-Amaro (Chairman)
José L. Ferrer-Canals
Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa

 

The Compensation and Benefits Committee charter provides that the Committee is to be composed of a minimum of three directors who meet the independence criteria established by the NYSE and our Independence

Principles for Directors. In addition, the members of the Committee are independent as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. The Committee is responsible for the oversight of our compensation policies and practices including the evaluation and recommendation to the Board of the proper and competitive salaries and competitive incentive compensation programs of the executive officers and key employees of the Corporation. The responsibilities and duties of the Committee include the following:

 

 

The Committee has the sole authority to engage outside consultants to assist it in determining appropriate compensation levels for the chief executive officer, other executive officers, and selected senior executives and to set fees and retention arrangements for such consultants. The Committee has full access to any relevant records of the Corporation and may request any employee of the Corporation or other person to meet with the Committee or its consultants.

 

The current members of this Committee are Messrs. Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi, Chairperson since August 2006, Jorge Díaz-Irizarry and José L. Ferrer-Canals (who was appointed to the Committee on October 27, 2009). Mr. José Teixidor-Méndez was a member of this Committee until his resignation from the Board in May 2009. Upon Mr. Teixidor-Méndez’s resignation in May 2009, Mr. Menéndez-Cortada was appointed member of the Committee through October 27, 2009. The Compensation and Benefits Committee met a total of five (5) times during fiscal year 2009.

 

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee charter provides that the Committee is to be composed of a minimum of three directors who meet the independence criteria established by the NYSE, the SEC and the our Independence Principles for Directors. The responsibilities and duties of the Committee include, among others, the following:

 

 

 

The current members of this committee are Messrs. José Menéndez-Cortada, Chairman of the Committee since October 27, 2009, José L. Ferrer-Canals, and Frank Kolodziej-Castro. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee met a total of five (5) times during fiscal year 2009.

 

Succession Management

 

With respect to regular succession of the chief executive officer and senior management, the Board evaluates internal, and, when appropriate, external, candidates. To find external candidates, we seek input from the members of the Board and senior management and/or from recruiting firms. To develop internal candidates, we retained Caliper during 2008 to develop a corporate succession plan that identifies and prepares certain selected officers to benefit from mentoring, training, and job rotation, in order to eventually replace key executives of the Corporation in an unforeseen event or due to other specific circumstances. Succession management is the planning, execution, and ongoing management of our critical future people needs. The focus is on developing today’s talent into tomorrow’s leaders. We began our management succession process with the identification and development of high-

potential employees for executive positions. In order to build a succession plan that will create a strong talent pool, we went through a five-step process:

 

 

During 2009, we completed Steps One through Four with respect to the first pool of identified high potential employees for our executive positions which encompass forty (40) officers of the Corporation. During 2010, we expect to extend the five-step process to a select group of senior management positions in addition to continuing Step Five of the first group of identified high potential employees for executive positions.

 

On September 28, 2009, Mr. Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez was appointed Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation upon the resignation of the former President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Luis Beauchamp-Rodríguez. Mr. Alemán-Bermúdez had been serving as Chief Operating Officer and Senior Executive Vice President since September 2005. In early 2009, Mr. Alemán-Bermúdez had been identified under the succession management process as the candidate for the chief executive officer position.

 

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors

 

The Board of Directors, acting through the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, is responsible for assembling for stockholder consideration a group of nominees that, taken together, have the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills appropriate for functioning effectively as a board. The Nominating Committee regularly reviews the composition of the Board in light of the Corporation’s changing requirements, its assessment of the Board’s performance, and the inputs of shareholders and other key constituencies. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee looks for certain characteristics common to all Board members, including integrity, strong professional reputation and record of achievement, constructive and collegial personal attributes, and the ability and commitment to devote sufficient time and energy to Board service. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee seeks to include on the Board a complementary mix of individuals with diverse backgrounds and skills reflecting the broad set of challenges that the Board confronts. These individual qualities can include matters like experience in our industry, technical experience, leadership experience, and relevant geographical experience. In fulfilling these responsibilities regarding Board membership, the Board adopted the Policy Regarding Selection of Directors, which sets forth the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s responsibility with respect to the identification and recommendation to the Board of qualified candidates for Board membership, which is to be based primarily on the following criteria:

 

 

 

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee does not have a specific diversity policy with respect to the director nomination process. Rather, this Committee considers diversity in the broader sense of how a candidate’s viewpoints, experience, skills, background and other demographics could assist the Board in light of the Board’s composition at the time.

 

The Committee gives appropriate consideration to candidates for Board membership nominated by stockholders and evaluates such candidates in the same manner as candidates identified by the Committee.

 

The Committee may use outside consultants to assist in identifying candidates. Members of the Committee discuss and evaluate possible candidates in detail prior to recommending them to the Board.

 

The Committee is also responsible for initially assessing whether a candidate would be an “independent” director under the requirements for independence established in our Independence Principles for Directors of First BanCorp and applicable rules and regulations (an “Independent Director”). The Board, taking into consideration the recommendations of the Committee, is responsible for selecting the nominees for election to the Board by the stockholders and for appointing directors to the Board to fill vacancies, with primary emphasis on the criteria set forth above. The Board, taking into consideration the assessment of the Committee, also makes a determination as to whether a nominee or appointee would be an Independent Director.

 

Director Education

 

In October 2009, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee retained the services of The Directors Network for the development and execution of an eight hour customized education program for the Board and senior management. The primary purpose for implementing the program was to ensure the continuous improvement in the effectiveness of the oversight of the Board and governance processes. The program covered topics such as banking strategy, director duties and liability, the Board’s role in the consideration of strategic options, financial literacy, and risk management matters. The program was delivered during the month of December and was ISS accredited.

 

In 2008, the Board revised its committee structure and resolved to segregate the Asset/Liability Risk Committee’s responsibilities into two separate committees; the Credit Committee and the Asset/Liability Committee. The Asset/Liability Committee’s charter provides that that Committee is to be composed of a minimum of three directors who meet the independence criteria established by the NYSE, the SEC, and our Independence Principles for Directors, and also include the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Chief Risk Officer. Under the terms of its charter, the Asset/Liability Committee assists the Board in its oversight of our policies and procedures related to asset and liability management, (i) funds management, (ii) investment management, (iii) liquidity, (iv) interest rate risk management, (v) capital adequacy, and (vi) the use of derivatives (the “ALM”). In doing so, the committee’s primary functions involve:

 

 

The current director members of this committee are Messrs. José Rodríguez-Perelló, appointed Chairman in May 2008, Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, José Menéndez-Cortada, Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa and Jorge Díaz-Irizarry. The Asset/Liability Committee met a total of four (4) times during fiscal year 2009.

 

The Credit Committee’s charter provides that this Committee is to be composed of a minimum of three directors who meet the independence criteria established by the NYSE, the SEC and our Independence Principles for Directors, and also include our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Lending Officer and Corporate Wholesale Banking Executive. Under the terms of its charter, the Credit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of our policies and procedures related to all matters of our lending function, hereafter “Credit Management.” In doing so, this Committee’s primary functions involve:

 

 

The current director members of this Committee are Messrs. Jorge Díaz-Irizarry, Chairman since May 2008, Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, José Menéndez-Cortada, Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa and José Rodríguez-Perelló. The Credit Committee met a total of twenty-three (23) times during fiscal year 2009.

 

On October 27, 2009, the Board approved the formation of the Strategic Planning Committee. This Committee was established to assist and advise management with respect to, and monitor and oversee on behalf of the Board, corporate development activities not in the ordinary course of our business and strategic alternatives under consideration from time to time by the Corporation, including, but not limited to, acquisitions, mergers, alliances, joint ventures, divestitures, capitalization of the Corporation and other similar corporate transactions.

 

The Strategic Planning Committee charter provides that this Committee is to be composed of a minimum of three directors who meet the independence criteria established by the NYSE, the SEC and the Corporation’s Independence Principles for Directors. The responsibilities and duties of the Committee include, among others, the following:

 

 

 

The current director members of this Committee are Messrs. Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa, Chairman since October 27, 2009, Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, Frank Kolodziej-Castro and José Rodríguez-Perelló. In addition, Messrs. Orlando Berges-González and Lawrence Odell are management members of the Committee. The Strategic Committee met a total of two (2) times during fiscal year 2009.

 

On January 15, 2010, the Board created the Capital Committee, an ad-hoc committee composed entirely of directors who do not own preferred stock for purposes of overseeing the Corporation’s proposal to undertake an exchange offer pursuant to which the Corporation would offer to holders of registered preferred stock shares of Common Stock in exchange for their preferred stock. The Capital Committee is responsible for evaluating and approving the terms and conditions of any exchange offer transaction and reporting to the Board. The Committee was granted full power to determine the terms and conditions of any exchange offer.

 

The current members of this Committee are Messrs. Fernando Rodríguez-Amaro, Chairman since January 15, 2010, Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, Frank Kolodziej-Castro, José Rodríguez-Perelló and José L. Ferrer-Canals.

 

We review all transactions and relationships in which the Corporation and any of its directors, director nominees, executive officers, security holders who are known to the Corporation to own of record or beneficially more than five percent of any class of the Corporation’s voting securities and any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons are participants to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect material interest. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Principles and Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers require our directors, executive officers and principal financial officers to report to the Board or the Audit Committee any situation that could be perceived as a conflict of interest. In addition, applicable law and regulations require that all loans or extensions of credit to executive officers and directors be made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons (unless the loan or extension of credit is made under a benefit program generally available to all employees and does not give preference to any insider over any other employee) and must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. Pursuant to Regulation O adopted by the Federal Reserve Board, any extension of credit to an executive officer, director, or principal stockholder, including any related interest of such persons (collectively an “Insider”), when aggregated with all other loans or lines of credit to that Insider: (a) exceeds 5% of the bank’s capital and unimpaired surplus or $25,000, whichever is greater, or (b) exceeds (in any case) $500,000, must be approved in advance by the majority of the entire Board, excluding the interested party.

 

During 2007, the Board adopted a Related Person Transaction Policy (the “Policy”) that addresses the reporting, review and approval or ratification of transactions with related persons, which include a director, a director nominee, an executive officer of the Corporation, a security holder who is known to the Corporation to own of record or beneficially more than five percent of any class of the Corporation’s voting securities, and an immediate family member of any of the foregoing (together the “Related Person”). The policy is not designed to prohibit related person transactions; rather, it is to provide for timely internal reporting of such transactions and appropriate review, appropriate approval or rejection, oversight and public disclosure of them.

 

For purposes of the Policy, a “related person transaction” is a transaction or arrangement or series of transactions or arrangements in which the Corporation participates (whether or not the Corporation is a party), the

amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a Related Person has a direct or indirect material interest. A Related Person’s interest in a transaction or arrangement is presumed material to such person unless it is clearly incidental in nature or has been determined in accordance with the policy to be immaterial in nature. A transaction in which any subsidiary of the Corporation or any other company controlled by the Corporation participates shall be considered a transaction in which the Corporation participates.

 

Examples of related person transactions generally include sales, purchases or other transfers of real or personal property, use of property and equipment by lease or otherwise, services received or furnished and the borrowing and lending of funds, as well as guarantees of loans or other undertakings and the employment by the Corporation of an immediate family member of a Related Person or a change in the terms or conditions of employment of such an individual that is material to such individual. However, the policy contains a list of categories of transactions that will not be considered related person transactions for purposes of the Policy given their nature, size and/or degree of significance to the Corporation, and therefore, need not be brought to the Audit Committee for their review and approval or ratification.

 

Any director, director nominee or executive officer who intends to enter into a related person transaction is required to disclose that intention and all material facts with respect to such transaction to the General Counsel, and any officer or employee of the Corporation who intends to cause the Corporation to enter into any related person transaction must disclose that intention and all material facts with respect to the transaction to his or her superior, who is responsible for seeing that such information is reported to the General Counsel. The General Counsel is responsible for determining whether a transaction may meet the requirements of a related person transaction requiring review under the Related Transaction Policy, and, upon such determination, must report the material facts respecting the transaction and the Related Person’s interest in such transaction to the Audit Committee for their review and approval or ratification. Any related party transaction in which the General Counsel has a direct or indirect interest is evaluated directly by the Audit Committee.

 

If a member of the Audit Committee has an interest in a related person transaction and, after such committee member excusing himself or herself from consideration of the transaction would reduce the number of Audit Committee members available to review and approve the transaction to less than two members, the transaction must instead be reviewed by an ad hoc committee of at least two independent directors designated by the Board. The Audit Committee may delegate its authority to review, approve or ratify specified related person transactions or categories of related person transactions when the Audit Committee determines that such action is warranted.

 

Annually, the Audit Committee must review any previously approved or ratified related person transaction that is continuing (unless the amount involved in the uncompleted portion of the transaction is less than $120,000) and determine, based on the then existing facts and circumstances, including the Corporation’s existing contractual or other obligations, if it is in the best interests of the Corporation to continue, modify or terminate the transaction.

 

The Audit Committee has the authority to (i) determine categories of related person transactions that are immaterial and not required to be individually reported to, reviewed by, and/or approved or ratified by the Audit Committee and (ii) approve in advance categories of related person transactions that need not be individually reported to, reviewed by, and/or approved or ratified by the Audit Committee but may instead be reported to and reviewed by the Audit Committee collectively on a periodic basis, which must be at least annually. The Audit Committee must notify the Board on a quarterly basis of all related person transactions approved or ratified by the Audit Committee.

 

In connection with approving or ratifying a related person transaction, the Audit Committee (or its delegate), in its judgment, must consider in light of the relevant facts and circumstances whether or not the transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Corporation, including consideration of the following factors to the extent pertinent:

 

 

 

During fiscal year 2009, directors and officers and persons or entities related to such directors and officers were customers of and had transactions with the Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. All such transactions were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time they were made for comparable transactions with persons not related the Corporation, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.

 

During 2009, the Corporation engaged, in the ordinary course of business, the legal services of Martínez Odell & Calabria. Lawrence Odell, General Counsel of the Corporation since February 2006, is a partner at Martínez Odell & Calabria (the “Law Firm”). On January 29, 2010, the Corporation approved an amendment to the agreement (the “Services Agreement”) it entered into with Law Firm in February 2006 in connection with the Corporation’s execution of an employment agreement with Lawrence Odell relating to his retention as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Mr. Odell’s employment agreement provides that, on each anniversary of the date of commencement, the term of such agreement is automatically extended for an additional one (1) year period beyond the then-effective expiration date and that Mr. Odell will remain a partner at the Law Firm during the term of his employment. The Services Agreement provides for the payment by the Corporation to the Law Firm of $60,000 per month as consideration for the services rendered to the Corporation by Mr. Odell. The Services Agreement had a term of four years expiring on February 14, 2010. In light of the automatic extension of Mr. Odell’s employment agreement, on January 29, 2010, the Corporation amended the Services Agreement for purposes of extending its term from February 14, 2010 until February 14, 2011, unless earlier terminated. The Corporation has also hired the Law Firm to be the corporate and regulatory counsel to it and FirstBank. In 2009, the Corporation paid $1,297,962 to the Law Firm for its legal services and $720,000 to the Law Firm in accordance with the terms of the Services Agreement. The engagement of the Law Firm was approved by the Audit Committee as required by the Policy

 

During 2009, the Corporation and its subsidiaries engaged, in the ordinary course of business, the services of Tactical Media, a diversified media company with operations in Puerto Rico that is partially owned by Mr. Angel Alvarez-Freiria, son of Mr. Angel Álvarez-Pérez, a beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Corporation’s Common Stock. Total fees paid during 2009 to Tactical Media amounted to $236,800. The engagement of Tactical Media was approved by the Audit Committee as required by the Policy.

 

During 2003, the Corporation entered into a loan agreement with an immediate family member of director Jorge Díaz-Irizarry. The loan was made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time it was made for comparable transactions with persons not related to the Corporation, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. In July 2005, the loan was classified past due. The largest amount of the loan outstanding during fiscal 2009 was $248,170.96. As of March 31, 2010, the amount of the loan outstanding was $248,170.96. During 2009 and through March 31, 2010, $18,558.40 of interest has been paid, at an interest rate of 4.25%. During such period no principal has been repaid.

 

During 2007, the Corporation entered into a loan agreement with an immediate family member of director Fernando Rodríguez-Amaro. The loan was made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time it was made for comparable transactions with persons not related to the Corporation, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. In the first quarter of 2009 the Corporation classified this loan in non-accruing status

because of concerns about the financial condition of the borrower. The largest amount of the loan outstanding during fiscal 2009 was $10,715,668. As of March 30, 2010, the amount of the loan outstanding was $10,535,505. During 2009 and through March 30, 2010, $403,272 of principal has been repaid and $62,624 of interest has been paid, at an interest rate of 5%.

 

The Corporation’s Compensation and Benefits Committee during fiscal year 2009 consisted of directors Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi, Chairperson since August 2006, José Teixidor-Méndez (who resigned as director in May 2009), Jorge L. Díaz-Irizarry, José Menéndez-Cortada (whose term on the Committee ended on October 27, 2009) and José L. Ferrer-Canals who was appointed to the Committee on October 27, 2009. No Executive Officer of the Corporation serves on any board of directors or compensation committee of any entity whose board members or management serves on the Corporation’s Board or on the Corporation’s Compensation and Benefits Committee. Other than as disclosed in the Certain Relationships and Related Transactions section of this Proxy Statement, none of the members of the Compensation and Benefits Committee had any relationship with the Corporation requiring disclosure under Item 404 of the SEC Regulation S-K.

 

There are no legal proceedings to which any director, officer or principal stockholder, or any affiliate thereof, is a party adverse to the Corporation or has a material interest adverse to the Corporation.

 

Non-management directors of the Corporation receive an annual retainer and compensation for attending meetings of the Board but not for attending meetings of the Board of Directors of the Bank when such meetings are held on the same day on which a Board meeting of the Corporation is held. Directors who are also officers of the Corporation, of FirstBank or of any other subsidiary do not receive fees or other compensation for service on the Board, the Board of Directors of FirstBank, or the Board of Directors of any other subsidiary or any of their committees. Accordingly, Messrs. Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez and Luis M. Beauchamp-Rodríguez, who were directors during all or part of 2009, are not included in the table set forth below because they were employees at the same time and, therefore, received no compensation for their services as a director during the terms they served on the Board.

 

In 2007, the Compensation and Benefits Committee retained Mercer (US) Inc., an outside compensation consultant, to provide services as compensation consultants. Mercer performed a director compensation review to assess the competitiveness of the Corporation’s Board compensation strategy for its non-management directors and provided recommendations in terms of structure and amount of compensation. As a result, in January 2008, the Board approved a compensation structure for non-management directors of the Corporation, which became effective in February 2008. Under the terms of the structure, each director receives an annual retainer of $30,000, the Chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $25,000 and the Lead Independent Director, which position was eliminated upon Mr. Menéndez-Cortada’s appointment as Chairman of the Board on September 28, 2010, received an additional annual retainer of $20,000. The retainers are payable in cash on a monthly basis over a twelve-month period. The director compensation structure also considered the receipt of an annual equity award of $35,000 payable in the form of restricted stock. In addition, all meeting fees were reduced to $1,000 for each Board or Committee meeting attended, which is also payable in cash. In December 2008, an annual equity award was granted under the terms and provisions of the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which was approved by the stockholders of the Corporation at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and pursuant to the provisions of the Corporation’s Policy Regarding the Granting of Equity-Based Compensation Awards approved by the Board in October 2008. During 2009, considering worsening economic conditions, which affected the performance of the Corporation, the Board determined to defer the award to a later time and not proceed with an equity award in December of 2009.

In October 2009, the Compensation and Benefits Committee retained the services of Compensation Advisory Partners LLC, an independent executive compensation consulting firm, who preformed an analysis of the Corporation’s peer group and examined pay practices in the broader financial services industry to determine a competitive compensation level for the non-management chairman of the Board appointed upon Mr. Beauchamp-Rodríguez’s resignation in September 28, 2009. Based upon the analysis, the Compensation and Benefits Committee recommended to the Board and the Board approved an annual cash retainer for the non-management chairman of $82,500.

 

The Corporation reimburses Board members for travel, lodging and other reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings or performing other services for the Corporation in their capacities as directors.

 

The Compensation and Benefits Committee will periodically review market data in order to determine the appropriate level of compensation for maintaining a competitive director compensation structure necessary to attract qualified candidates for board service.

 

The following table sets forth all the compensation that the Corporation paid to non-management directors during fiscal year 2009:

 

 

 

The Board has approved an amendment to Article Sixth of the Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock, par value $1.00, authorized for issuance from 250,000,000 shares to 750,000,000 shares and, as a result, increasing the total number of shares of all classes, including the Corporation’s preferred stock, that are authorized for issuance from 300,000,000 shares to 800,000,000 shares.

 

We currently have 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock outstanding and 12,091,353 shares of Common Stock reserved for outstanding options and warrants that the Corporation could be required to issue pursuant to the Corporation’s employee benefit plans and the Letter Agreement entered into with the Treasury. Accordingly, we have 145,365,925 shares of Common Stock that are not outstanding or reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options or warrants. In addition, we have 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized of which 22,404,000 shares are issued and outstanding.

 

The Board believes that it is in the best interest of the Corporation and its stockholders that the Corporation increase the number of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock principally because:

 

 

 

 

Finally, if the stockholders approve the increase in authorized shares of Common Stock, the Corporation may use the additional authorized shares for other corporate purposes, such as, to issue shares of Common Stock for outstanding preferred stock; fund future acquisitions and expansion opportunities that may arise; general corporate needs, such as future stock dividends, assuming it can resume paying dividends, or stock splits; and for other proper purposes within the limitations of the law as the Board may think are appropriate. If we issue shares of Common Stock in a capital raise, it is not likely that we will make the exchange offer described in our registration statement filed on March 5, 2010 registering the offering of shares of Common Stock in exchange for shares of currently outstanding registered preferred stock.

 

If approved, the amendment will become effective upon the filing of the amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Department of State of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, which filing will be made promptly after approval of the proposal at the Annual Meeting. Thereafter, the Board will be able to authorize the issuance of the additional shares of Common Stock, as well as the currently authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock, for any corporate purposes, without further action by stockholders, except as required by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) or as limited by the Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation.

 

The issuance of additional shares of Common Stock will have a dilutive effect on earnings per share and equity, and will have a dilutive effect on the voting power of existing stockholders. The terms of any Common Stock issuance will be determined by the Board and depend upon the purpose for the issuance, market conditions and other factors existing at the time.

 

Approval of Proposal No. 2 to amend the Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 250,000,000 to 750,000,000 requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding.

 

The Board recommends the approval by stockholders of the proposal to amend Article Sixth of the Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of Common Stock from 250,000,000 to 750,000,000.

If approved, Article Sixth of the Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation will be revised as follows, with new language in bold and deleted language in brackets:

 

The authorized capital of the Corporation shall be EIGHT HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS ($800,000,000) [THREE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS ($300,000,000)] represented by SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION (750,000,000) [TWO HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION ($250,000,000)] shares of common stock, ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) par value per share, and FIFTY MILLION (50,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) par value per share. The shares may be issued by the Corporation from time to time as authorized by the board of directors without the further approval of shareholders, except as otherwise provided in this Article Sixth or to the extent that such approval is required by governing law, rule or regulations.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK.

 

This proposal seeks stockholder approval of the issuance in one or more transactions by the Corporation of an amount of shares of Common Stock that is likely to equal more than 20% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock and may even constitute a change in its control, in order to comply with listing requirements of the NYSE. We believe that such issuance would be necessary to make us eligible to participate in acquisition opportunities in Puerto Rico, particularly FDIC-assisted transactions. In FDIC-assisted transactions, the FDIC typically provides assistance through loss sharing arrangements and other measures that limit the risks to the acquirer. In addition, although FirstBank’s capital exceeds the amount necessary for it to qualify as “well capitalized” for regulatory purposes, its risk profile is elevated because the performance of FirstBank’s outstanding loans and the current adverse relationship of nonperforming loans to capital could worsen as a result of the prolonged recession in the markets in which we operate. As a result of this, the FDIC has urged the Corporation to raise capital in an expedited process, in amounts sufficient to provide additional protection from the possibility that FirstBank will incur additional write-downs on its loan portfolio. Accordingly, the Corporation has been seeking common equity financing. If we issue shares of Common Stock in a capital raise, it is not likely that we will make the exchange offer described in our registration statement filed on March 5, 2010 registering the offering of shares of Common Stock in exchange for shares of currently outstanding registered preferred stock.

 

We are currently engaged in discussions with several prospective acquirers of Common Stock. At this time, however, we have no agreements or understandings as to any issuance of Common Stock. Accordingly, we do not know whether the consideration that we determine to accept for the shares of Common Stock we issue in a capital raise will consist only of cash or of cash and other assets.

 

We are seeking to negotiate the issuance of Common Stock in one or more transactions so that the Corporation’s strengthened financial condition will enable it to participate in acquisition opportunities in Puerto Rico, particularly potential FDIC-assisted transactions, and will enhance its ability to operate in the current economic environment.

 

We believe that it is important that the Bank continue to enhance its competitive position in Puerto Rico. Accordingly, the Board and management believe that it is important for the Corporation to be able to make opportunistic acquisitions. The increase in outstanding Common Stock would be designed to enable the Corporation to participate in acquisition opportunities in Puerto Rico, particularly potential FDIC-assisted transactions.

 

We also believe that it is important for us to respond positively to the FDIC’s request that the Corporation increase its common equity in light of the depressed economic situation in Puerto Rico. During 2009, the Corporation recorded a provision for loan and lease losses of $579.9 million, compared to a provision of $190.9 million in 2008 and $120.6 million in 2007. The increase in outstanding Common Stock would enhance

the Corporation’s long-term financial stability, improve its ability to operate in the current economic environment, and enhance its ability to fund strategic initiatives or other business needs and to absorb any future credit losses.

 

If we enter into any agreement relating to the issuance of Common Stock prior to the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we will supplement this proxy statement to describe the terms of such any such agreements. If we enter into any agreement relating to the issuance of Common Stock after the date of the Annual Meeting, stockholders will not have the opportunity to review and consider the terms of such an agreement prior to voting on this proposal.

 

Stockholder approval of the issuance of shares of Common Stock we are seeking is required by the listing requirements of the NYSE. NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03 requires stockholder approval prior to the issuance of common stock, or of securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock, if, except in the case of public offerings and private placements meeting certain requirements, (1) the common stock has, or will have upon issuance, voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance of such stock or of securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock, (2) the number of shares of common stock to be issued is, or will be upon issuance, equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding before the issuance of the common stock or of securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock, or (3) the issuance would result in a change in control of the company. Since the issuance of Common Stock is likely to result in the issuance of more than 20% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock and may even constitute a change in control of the Corporation, we are seeking stockholder approval of the issuance in one or more transactions of shares of Common Stock to satisfy the applicable NYSE stockholder approval requirement.

 

We are likely to agree to issue shares of Common Stock at a price below the book value, and the tangible book value, per share of Common Stock. As of April 2, 2010, the market price of a share of Common Stock was $[  •  ]. As of December 31, 2009, the book value per share was $7.25 and the tangible book value per share was $6.76 per share. Accordingly, any issuance of shares of Common Stock would almost surely substantially reduce the book value of each share of Common Stock. In order to achieve our goals, we are seeking to sell at least 145,365,925 shares of Common Stock, the shares that are currently available for issuance. If stockholders approve the amendment of our Restated Articles of Incorporation, to the extent required, we may need to issue up to a total of approximately 645,365,925 shares of Common Stock. Since we have no idea at what price we may sell the shares, however, we cannot estimate the impact of the sale on our book value per share. In addition, any such stock issuance would dilute the voting power of current stockholders and the earnings per share of current stockholders. Nevertheless, the Board and management believe that the long-term prospects of the Corporation, and therefore our stockholders, would be enhanced by the proposed issuance of shares of Common Stock.

 

We believe that the issuance of shares of Common Stock to one investor could result in a change in control of the Corporation because we may need to issue all currently available shares of Common Stock, and, if the proposal to amend our Restated Articles of Incorporation is approved, up to a total of 645,365,925 shares to the extent required. The issuance of the 145,365,925 shares of Common Stock currently available to one investor would result in that investor owning approximately 61% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock, which would give that investor control over the Corporation. If we issue 645,365,925 shares in a capital raise, the new investor(s) would own 87% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock. If we issue the shares to private equity investors, however, the transaction would not likely result in a change in control because private equity investors may not want to own or control more than 24.9% of our Common Stock to avoid being considered a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956.

 

We cannot give any assurances that the issuance of Common Stock would achieve its purposes. We are not certain whether it would enable us to participate in acquisition opportunities. In addition, an increase in common

equity might not adequately protect the Corporation from further credit losses and the Corporation might need to obtain additional capital in order to appropriately absorb such losses.

 

Even if the Common Stock issuance permits us to make acquisitions in Puerto Rico, there is no assurance that the Corporation’s long-term prospects would be enhanced. Stockholders would not be able to express their views on the merits of any such transaction because the Corporation would not solicit stockholder approval of the acquisition itself. If we complete an acquisition, including an FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation would still be subject to multiple risks. Any acquisition is subject to the risks that the Corporation cannot retain customers or deposits of the acquired bank, is unable to fully assess the quality of the acquired bank’s loan portfolio, cannot efficiently and adequately integrate the acquired bank’s operations into the Corporation’s operations or needs additional capital to absorb the acquired bank’s losses. Although an FDIC-assisted acquisition typically includes FDIC assistance to an acquirer designed to mitigate risks that the acquirer would otherwise assume in the acquisition, such as through an agreement under which the FDIC would share losses on loans or would indemnify the acquirer against certain liabilities, if we complete an FDIC-assisted acquisition, the Corporation would still be subject to the risks inherent in any acquisition as well as risks because of the potentially limited time period for us to adequately conduct due diligence and the intensity and adverse impact of the bidding process on management’s resources. We might not be able to overcome any of the risks related to an acquisition. Accordingly, if we are able to make an acquisition, no assurance can be given that the acquisition would not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s operations, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.

 

If we issue shares of Common Stock in a transaction, whether to one investor or to a group of private investors, that results in a change in control of the Corporation, the interests of current stockholders in the Corporation would be significantly diluted, as discussed above. Even if the capital raise results in a change in control, we expect that the Corporation would continue to be a public company with shares listed on the NYSE and that the capital investment sought would strengthen the Corporation’s ability to absorb any future losses on its loan portfolios.

 

Additionally, the Treasury’s anti-dilution right will be triggered if the Common Stock is sold at a price equal to less than 90% of the market value of the Common Stock as determined pursuant to the terms of the warrant. If the U.S. Treasury’s anti-dilution right is triggered, we will need to adjust the exercise price for and the number of shares underlying the warrant.

 

If stockholders do not approve the issuance of shares of Common Stock, we would have to decide whether to:

 

 

The first alternative would make it extremely unlikely that the Corporation would be able to participate in any acquisition opportunities in Puerto Rico, including any opportunities to participate in an FDIC-assisted transaction.

 

The second alternative also may not be successful. While the NYSE has a procedure for requesting a waiver from the stockholder approval requirement when (1) the delay in securing stockholder approval would seriously jeopardize the financial viability of a company and (2) reliance by the company on this exception is expressly approved by the audit committee, we do not know if the NYSE would grant a waiver after the Corporation has failed to obtain the required stockholder approval.

 

If stockholders do not approve Proposal No. 2, which would increase the number of shares of Common Stock authorized in our Restated Articles of Incorporation, we will seek to negotiate a sale of the 145,365,925 shares of Common Stock currently available for issuance. Because a sale of these remaining authorized shares of Common Stock would not sufficiently improve the Corporation’s capital, we will seek also to negotiate a sale of securities, probably shares of preferred stock, that automatically convert into Common Stock when an amendment to the Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares is approved by the Corporation’s stockholders, including the holders of the newly issued currently available shares of common stock, who would agree to vote in favor of such an amendment in connection with their acquisition of those shares and would hold in the aggregate a majority of our outstanding shares of Common Stock (and whose vote would,

therefore, assure approval of the amendment). The exercise price on any such shares of convertible securities is likely to be below the book value per share as of December 31, 2009 since the market price of our Common Stock on April 5, 2010 was $[     ]. Therefore, like the issuance of shares of Common Stock, the issuance of convertible securities might result in a decrease in the value of our Common Stock and would dilute stockholders’ voting power and earnings per share.

 

Approval of this Proposal No. 3 to issue shares of Common Stock to enable the Corporation to participate in acquisition opportunities in Puerto Rico, particularly potential FDIC-assisted transactions, and to improve its financial condition and ability to operate in the current economic environment requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal, provided that the total votes cast on the proposal, whether for or against this proposal, represent over 50% of all of the shares of Common Stock outstanding.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK.

 

 

Section 111(e) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”), as amended by the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (“ARRA”), imposes a number of requirements on financial institutions, such as the Corporation, which received an investment under the Capital Purchase Program of the United States Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”). ARRA requires that at each annual meeting of stockholders during the period in which any obligation arising from TARP financial assistance remains outstanding, TARP recipients must allow a separate, nonbinding stockholder vote to approve the compensation of executives. Because this stockholder vote is advisory, it is not binding upon the Board or construed as overruling any decision by the Board. However, the Compensation Committee may take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. The Corporation’s overall executive compensation policies and procedures are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tabular disclosure regarding the Named Executives compensation (together with the accompanying narrative disclosure) in this Proxy Statement. The Proxy Statement fully discloses all material information regarding the compensation of the Corporation’s Named Executives, so that stockholders can evaluate the Corporation’s approach to compensating its executives. The Corporation and the Compensation and Benefits Committee continually monitor executive compensation programs and adopt changes to reflect best practices in the market, as well as general economic, regulatory and legislative developments affecting executive compensation. The Corporation’s policies and procedures are designed to promote a performance-based culture by providing for higher pay for superior performance and align the interests of shareholders and executives by linking a substantial portion of compensation to the Corporation’s performance, without encouraging executives to take unnecessary and excessive risks. Although certain incentive payments are now prohibited by TARP, the Corporation will continue to emphasize compensation arrangements that align the financial interests of our executives with the interests of long-term stockholders.

 

This proposal, commonly known as a “Say on Pay” proposal, gives the Corporation’s stockholders the opportunity to vote on the Corporation’s executive compensation policies and procedures through the following resolution:

 

“Resolved, that the stockholders approve the compensation of executives as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the disclosures regarding the Named Executives Officers’ compensation provided in the various tables, and the accompanying narrative disclosures, included in this Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”

 

Approval of this Proposal No. 4 regarding executive compensation requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THIS PROPOSAL ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

PROPOSAL NO. 5
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Audit Committee of the Board is required by law and applicable NYSE rules to be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and retention of the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm. The firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has been selected as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Corporation for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. While shareholder ratification is not required by the Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation or otherwise, the Board is submitting the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to the stockholders for ratification as part of good corporate governance practices. If the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee may, but is not required to, reconsider whether to retain PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent auditor at any time during the fiscal year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Corporation and its stockholders. The firm will be represented at the Annual Meeting and representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement, if they so desire, and also will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

Approval of this Proposal No. 5 regarding ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal.

 

     THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF THE CORPORATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2010.

 

The total fees paid or accrued by the Corporation for professional services rendered by the external auditors for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 were $1,711,175 and $1,590,400, respectively, distributed as follows:

 

 

The Audit Committee has established controls and procedures that require the pre-approval of all audit, audit-related and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in order to ensure that the rendering of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee may delegate to one or more of its members the authority to pre-approve any audit, audit-related or permissible non-audit services, and the member to whom such delegation was made must report any pre-approval decisions at the next scheduled meeting of the Audit Committee. Under the pre-approval policy, audit services for the Corporation are negotiated annually. In the event that any additional audit services not included in the annual negotiation of services are required by the Corporation, an amendment to the existing engagement letter or an additional proposed engagement letter is obtained from the independent registered public accounting firm and evaluated by the Audit Committee or the member(s) of the Audit Committee with authority to pre-approve such services.

 

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes the objectives of the Corporation’s executive compensation program, the process for determining executive officer compensation, and the elements of the compensation of the Corporation’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and the next three highest paid executive officers of the Corporation (together the “Named Executives”).

 

The executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation and Benefits Committee (the “Compensation Committee”). The Compensation Committee reviews and recommends to the Board the annual goals and objectives relevant to the CEO. The Committee is also responsible for evaluating and recommending to the Board the base salaries, annual incentives and long-term equity incentive and long-term equity incentive awards for the CEO, executive vice presidents and other selected executives of the Corporation.

 

The Corporation has designed an executive compensation structure designed to help attract, motivate, reward and retain highly qualified executives. The compensation programs are designed to fairly reflect, in the judgment of the Compensation Committee, the Corporation’s performance, and the responsibilities and personal performance of the individual executives, while assuring that the compensation reflects principles of sound risk management and performance metrics consistent with long-term contributions to sustained profitability, as well as fidelity to the values and roles of conduct expected. To support those goals, the Corporation’s policy is to provide its Named Executives with a competitive base salary, a short-term annual incentive, a long-term equity incentive and other fringe benefits. The annual incentive and the long-term equity incentive, which are the variable components of the compensation, are based on specific performance metrics that vary by participant. The annual incentive incorporates metrics that are tailored to an executive’s responsibilities and consider corporate, business unit/area and individual performance. The long-term incentive is driven entirely by corporate performance.

 

In light of the Corporation’s participation in the U.S. Department of the Treasury Troubled Asset Relief Capital Purchase Program (the “Capital Purchase Program” or “CPP”), the Corporation became subject to certain executive compensation restrictions under EESA, as amended by ARRA and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, under Treasury regulations and under the contract pursuant to which the Corporation sold preferred stock to the Treasury. Those restrictions apply to what the Treasury refers to as the Corporation’s Senior Executive Officers (SEOs), which are the Named Executives as such are defined under SEC regulations. For 2009, because of the Corporation’s participation in the CPP, the Compensation and Benefits Committee operated the executive compensation program in a significantly different fashion than in prior years. Specifically, under the CPP, the Corporation:

 

 

 

As required by ARRA, a number of amendments were made to our executive compensation program; these are:

 

 

To the extent the Corporation repays the TARP investment in the future, the Corporation anticipates a complete re-evaluation of base salary and short, and long-term incentive programs to ensure they align strategically with the needs of the business and the competitive market at that time.

 

The Corporation has a performance-oriented executive compensation program that is designed to support its corporate strategic goals, including growth in earnings and growth in shareholder value. The compensation structure reflects the belief that executive compensation must, to a large extent, be at risk where the amount earned depends on achieving rigorous corporate, business unit and individual performance objectives designed to enhance stockholder value. To the extent the Corporation resumes paying bonuses in the future, actual incentive payouts will be larger if superior target performance is achieved and smaller if target performance is not achieved.

 

The Corporation targets total compensation, including base salaries, annual target incentive opportunities, and long-term target incentive opportunities including equity-based incentives, at the 75th percentile of compensation paid by similarly-sized companies. We believe targeting the 75th percentile is appropriate given the degree of difficulty in achieving our performance targets, as demonstrated by our not making any grants of long-term incentive in 2009 due to the company not achieving a specified level of financial performance. An additional

consideration relates to the challenges of attracting and retaining talent. While the philosophy is to set total compensation for executives at the 75th percentile of compensation paid by a peer group of banks, the Corporation will also assess competitive or recruiting pressures in the market for executive talent. These pressures potentially may threaten the ability to retain key executives. The Board will exercise its discretion in adjusting compensation targets as necessary and appropriate to address these risks.

 

The Compensation Committee typically reviews and recommends to the Board the base salaries, short-term incentive awards and long-term incentive awards of the CEO and other selected senior executives in the first quarter of each year with respect to performance results for the preceding year. The Corporation’s President and CEO, following the compensation structure approved by the Board, makes recommendations concerning the amount of compensation to be awarded to executive officers, excluding himself. The CEO does not participate in the Compensation Committee’s deliberations or decisions. The Compensation Committee reviews and considers his recommendations and makes a final determination. In making its determinations, the Compensation Committee reviews the Corporation’s performance as a whole and the performance of the executives as it relates to the accomplishment of the goals and objectives set forth for management for the year, together with any such goals that have been established for the relevant lines of business of the Corporation.

 

Through September 21, 2009, the Compensation Committee retained Mercer as its independent executive compensation consultants. Following this period, the Committee decided to engage Compensation Advisory Partners (“CAP”) as the consultant when the lead consultant on the Mercer engagement left Mercer to form CAP. CAP provides advice to the Committee on executive compensation. Neither CAP nor Mercer provided any other services to the Corporation.

 

The role of the outside compensation consultants is to assist the Compensation Committee in analyzing executive pay packages and contracts, perform executive compensation reviews including market competitive assessments and develop executive compensation recommendations for the Compensation Committee’s consideration.

 

As part of the Corporation’s annual review of compensation, the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant obtained information about the compensation paid to the executive officers of a peer group of 14 other banks. These companies are selected based on their industry and their being of comparable size in terms of assets to the Corporation. In addition to the peer group, the Compensation Committee utilizes market survey data as an additional reference point. The peer group used in 2009 consisted of the following companies:

 

 

We use this peer group to assess the following:

 

 

The Corporation’s size in terms of assets was between the median and the 75th percentile of the peer group. For this reason, the Corporation targeted pay at a level of between the median and the 75% percentile of the peer group.

 

Based on the executive compensation review performed in august 2009, Named Executives salary levels for 2009 were competitive; hence we did not provide salary increases for 2009 to any of the Named Executives.

 

We will continue to monitor market competitive levels and the Compensation Committee will make adjustments as appropriate to align executive officer pay with our stated pay philosophy and desire to drive a strong performance oriented culture. In light of the constraints we and many of our peers face under ARRA, we believe the market will continue to change quickly and we will monitor these changes to ensure our programs allow us to continue to attract and retain top talent and reward for strong performance and value creation.

 

The elements of the Corporation’s regular total compensation program (not all elements of which are currently active because of the TARP requirements) and the objectives of each element are identified in the below:

 

 

Each element of the compensation structure is intended to support and promote the following results and behavior:

 

 

Base Salary

 

Base salary is the basic element of direct cash compensation, designed to reward individual performance and level of experience. In setting the base salary, the Board takes into consideration the experience, skills, knowledge and responsibilities required of the Named Executives in their roles, the individual’s achievement of pre-determined goals and objectives, the Corporation’s performance and marketplace salary data to help ensure that base salaries of the Corporation’s Named Executives are within competitive practices relative to the base salaries of comparable executive officers in peer group companies. The Board seeks to maintain base salaries that are competitive with the marketplace, to allow it to attract and retain executive talent.

 

As noted above under “2009 Competitive Review,” the base salaries of the Named Executives were not increased during 2009 because, in addition to a consideration of the performance of the Corporation during 2009, the Compensation Committee concluded that, based on an analysis of peer data, the Named Executives’ base salaries were consistent with those paid to executives of comparable peers. In addition, during 2009 the Corporation expanded the salary freeze in effect applicable to employees whose base salary exceeds $50,000 to all employees of the Corporation until business conditions improve. The base salaries of Messrs. Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez and

Randolfo Rivera-Sanfeliz have not been adjusted since 2005 and the base salary of Mr. Lawrence Odell has not been adjusted since 2006 when he became an employee of the Corporation.

 

Annual Incentive

 

Generally, the annual incentive element of the Corporation’s executive compensation program is designed to provide cash bonuses to executive officers who generate strong corporate financial performance and, therefore, seeks to link the payment of cash bonuses to the achievement of key strategic, operational and financial performance objectives. Other criteria, besides financial performance, may include objectives and goals that may not involve actions that specifically and directly relate to financial matters, but the resolutions of which would necessarily protect the financial soundness of the Corporation.

 

In light of the restrictions imposed under the CPP, this component of compensation is suspended during the TARP period. No bonus will be earned or paid to our Named Executives and the next ten most highly compensated employees during that period. Furthermore, subject to the limitations imposed by the CPP, considering the continuing worsening economic conditions which affected the performance of the Corporation, during 2009 the Corporation limited cash incentives to those employees who exceeded and consistently demonstrated exceptional performance.

 

Long-Term Equity Incentive

 

The long-term equity incentive executive compensation structure approved by the Board provides a variable pay opportunity for long-term performance through a combination of restricted stock and stock option grants designed to reward overall corporate performance. The award is intended to align the interests of the Named Executives directly to the interests of the stockholder and is an important retention tool for the Corporation. Generally, the compensation structure considers long-term incentive award values allocated 50% in stock options and 50% in performance-accelerated restricted stock. Stock option grants are awarded based on overall individual performance and the performance-accelerated restricted stock are awarded if a minimum of 80% of the respective year’s after tax adjusted net income target is achieved. Notwithstanding the foregoing, under the CPP, the Corporation’s incentive program for Named Executives is solely allowed in the form of restricted stock. In accordance with CPP limitations, the Named Executives are eligible for a long-term restricted stock grant of up to one-third of their total annual compensation. Such restricted stock requires a minimum vesting period of two years after the grant date and is subject to transferability restrictions thereafter as required by EESA, so long as CPP obligations remain outstanding (shares may become transferable in 25% increments as the CPP funds are repaid by the Corporation). During 2009, no restricted stock awards were granted due to the Corporation’s financial performance and the continued worsening economic conditions which affected the performance of the Corporation resulting in the failure to achieve the minimum 80% after tax adjusted net income target required to make a restricted stock award. In addition, in light of the restrictions imposed under the CPP, the stock option component of compensation is suspended during the TARP period.

 

Other Compensation

 

The use of personal benefits and perquisites as an element of compensation in the Corporation’s 2009 executive compensation program is extremely limited. The Named Executives are provided with a corporate-owned automobile, club memberships and a life insurance policy of $1,000,000 ($500,000 in excess of other employees). Like other employees, the Named Executives participate in the 1165(e) plan (including the Corporation’s match) and group medical and dental plans and receive long-term and short-term disability, health care, and group life insurance benefits. In addition, the CEO is provided with personal security and a chauffeur solely for business purposes.

 

 

The Summary Compensation Table set forth below discloses compensation for the Named Executives of the Corporation, FirstBank or its subsidiaries.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due to the Corporation’s financial performance during 2009, non-equity and equity incentive award opportunities were not achieved and no grants of plan-based awards were made, specifically:

 

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the unexercised options held by Named Executives as of December 31, 2009.