Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011.
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 1-9028
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
95-3997619
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1150
Newport Beach, California
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
92660
(Zip Code) |
(949) 718-4400
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
Common stock, $0.10 par value, outstanding at May 4, 2011: 126,652,983
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
MARCH 31, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
Part I. Financial Information
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
342,161 |
|
|
$ |
339,534 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
3,796,893 |
|
|
|
3,679,745 |
|
Development in progress |
|
|
21,866 |
|
|
|
17,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,160,920 |
|
|
|
4,037,106 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(701,717 |
) |
|
|
(670,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,459,203 |
|
|
|
3,366,505 |
|
Mortgage loans receivable, net |
|
|
262,675 |
|
|
|
289,187 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
41,875 |
|
|
|
42,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,763,753 |
|
|
|
3,698,274 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
51,207 |
|
|
|
59,591 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
9,432 |
|
|
|
8,336 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
4,946 |
|
|
|
5,150 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
155,383 |
|
|
|
163,238 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
169,124 |
|
|
|
158,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,153,845 |
|
|
$ |
4,092,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured senior credit facility |
|
$ |
245,000 |
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
991,633 |
|
|
|
991,633 |
|
Notes and bonds payable |
|
|
365,164 |
|
|
|
362,624 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
147,036 |
|
|
|
151,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,748,833 |
|
|
|
1,680,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable OP unitholder interests |
|
|
92,575 |
|
|
|
79,188 |
|
Commitments and contingencies
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHP stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $1.00 par value; 5,000,000
shares authorized; none issued and
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.10 par value; 200,000,000
shares authorized; issued and
outstanding: 126,623,729 and 126,253,858 at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
12,662 |
|
|
|
12,625 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
2,505,565 |
|
|
|
2,516,397 |
|
Cumulative net income |
|
|
1,899,596 |
|
|
|
1,849,045 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
9,840 |
|
|
|
8,614 |
|
Cumulative dividends |
|
|
(2,148,141 |
) |
|
|
(2,086,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total NHP stockholders equity |
|
|
2,279,522 |
|
|
|
2,299,827 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
32,915 |
|
|
|
33,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
2,312,437 |
|
|
|
2,333,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,153,845 |
|
|
$ |
4,092,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
2
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per |
|
|
|
share amounts) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triple-net lease rent |
|
$ |
82,271 |
|
|
$ |
72,200 |
|
Medical office building operating rent |
|
|
29,515 |
|
|
|
21,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,786 |
|
|
|
93,885 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
10,588 |
|
|
|
6,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,374 |
|
|
|
100,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
22,771 |
|
|
|
23,590 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
38,674 |
|
|
|
31,290 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,365 |
|
|
|
6,980 |
|
Merger and acquisition costs |
|
|
5,097 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
Medical office building operating expenses |
|
|
10,358 |
|
|
|
8,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,265 |
|
|
|
71,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
38,109 |
|
|
|
28,898 |
|
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
Gain on debt extinguishment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
39,574 |
|
|
|
30,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of facilities, net |
|
|
10,607 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,740 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
50,314 |
|
|
|
31,239 |
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
$ |
50,551 |
|
|
$ |
31,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Discontinued operations attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
126,474 |
|
|
|
117,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Discontinued operations attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
128,980 |
|
|
|
119,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHP Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
excess of |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
par value |
|
|
net income |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
dividends |
|
|
interests |
|
|
equity |
|
Balances at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
126,254 |
|
|
$ |
12,625 |
|
|
$ |
2,516,397 |
|
|
$ |
1,849,045 |
|
|
$ |
8,614 |
|
|
$ |
(2,086,854 |
) |
|
$ |
33,283 |
|
|
$ |
2,333,110 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
50,314 |
|
Gain on interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
Amortization of gain on Treasury lock
agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
Pro rata share of accumulated other
comprehensive income from unconsolidated
joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,540 |
|
Issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
Common dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,287 |
) |
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests
to current redemption value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,406 |
) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
126,624 |
|
|
$ |
12,662 |
|
|
$ |
2,505,565 |
|
|
$ |
1,899,596 |
|
|
$ |
9,840 |
|
|
$ |
(2,148,141 |
) |
|
$ |
32,915 |
|
|
$ |
2,312,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50,314 |
|
|
$ |
31,239 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
38,699 |
|
|
|
31,969 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
Deferred gain recognition |
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(620 |
) |
Gain on debt extinguishment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
Gains on sale of facilities, net |
|
|
(10,607 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Straight-line rent |
|
|
(2,446 |
) |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
Amortization of above/below market lease intangibles, net |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
Mortgage and other loan premium amortization |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
Distributions of income from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(1,096 |
) |
|
|
(1,706 |
) |
Intangible and other assets |
|
|
(6,156 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(15,060 |
) |
|
|
(17,394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
55,486 |
|
|
|
43,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate and related assets and liabilities |
|
|
(118,163 |
) |
|
|
(65,056 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of real estate facilities |
|
|
8,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in mortgage and other loans receivable |
|
|
(2,648 |
) |
|
|
(140,437 |
) |
Principal payments on mortgage and other loans receivable |
|
|
36,086 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(75,468 |
) |
|
|
(203,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facility |
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of borrowings under credit facility |
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of notes and bonds payable |
|
|
4,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on notes and bonds payable |
|
|
(1,629 |
) |
|
|
(5,020 |
) |
Redemption of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
Issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
45,875 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(61,138 |
) |
|
|
(51,979 |
) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
Distributions to redeemable OP unitholders |
|
|
(1,019 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
11,598 |
|
|
|
(11,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(8,384 |
) |
|
|
(171,688 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
59,591 |
|
|
|
382,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
51,207 |
|
|
$ |
210,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual of contingent purchase price obligation |
|
$ |
12,018 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumption of debt upon acquisition of real estate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
109,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of mortgage loan receivable upon acquisition of real estate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
47,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interests upon acquisition of real estate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of redeemable OP units upon acquisition of real estate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of mortgage loan receivables upon sale of real estate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current redemption value |
|
$ |
14,406 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
1. Organization
Nationwide Health Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, is a real estate investment trust
(REIT) that invests in healthcare related real estate, primarily senior housing, long-term care
properties and medical office buildings. Whenever we refer herein to NHP or to us or use the
terms we or our, we are referring to Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. and its subsidiaries,
unless the context otherwise requires.
We primarily make our investments by acquiring an ownership interest in senior housing and
long-term care facilities and leasing them to unaffiliated tenants under triple-net master
leases that transfer the obligation for all facility operating costs (including maintenance,
repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures) to the tenant. We also invest in medical office
buildings which are not generally subject to triple-net leases and generally have multiple
tenants under separate leases in each building, thus requiring active management and responsibility
for many of the associated operating expenses (although many of these are, or can effectively be,
passed through to the tenants). Some of the medical office buildings are subject to triple-net
leases. In addition, but to a much lesser extent because we view the risks of this activity to be
greater due to less favorable bankruptcy treatment and other factors, from time to time, we extend
mortgage loans and other financing to operators.
We believe we have operated in such a manner as to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856
through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). We intend to continue to
qualify as such and therefore distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (computed without
regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding capital gain) to our stockholders. If we
qualify for taxation as a REIT, and we distribute 100% of our taxable income to our stockholders,
we will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our income that is distributed to
stockholders. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal income taxes.
As of March 31, 2011, we had investments in 665 healthcare facilities, one land parcel, three
development projects and one asset held for sale located in 42 states.
At March 31, 2011, one of our triple-net lease tenants accounted for more than 10% of our
revenues, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. (Brookdale), which accounted for 11.2% of our revenues.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
We have prepared the condensed consolidated financial statements included herein without
audit. These financial statements include all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010 pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
Certain items in prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to
current year presentation, including those required by the provisions of Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 360, Property, Plant and
Equipment (ASC 360), which require the operating results of any assets with their own
identifiable cash flows that are disposed of or held for sale and in which we have no continuing
interest to be removed from income from continuing operations and reported as discontinued
operations.
6
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to these rules and regulations. Although we believe that the
disclosures in the financial statements included herein are adequate to make the information
presented not misleading, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC. The results of operations for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results for a
full year.
We have evaluated events subsequent to March 31, 2011 for their impact on our condensed
consolidated financial statements (see Note 19).
Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts, the accounts of our
wholly owned subsidiaries and the accounts of our joint ventures that are controlled through voting
rights or other means. We apply the provisions of ASC Topic 810, Consolidation (ASC 810), for
arrangements with variable interest entities (VIEs) and would consolidate those VIEs where we are
the primary beneficiary. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Our judgment with respect to our level of influence or control of an entity and whether we are
the primary beneficiary of a VIE involves the consideration of various factors including, but not
limited to, the form of our ownership interest, our representation on the entitys governing body,
the size of our investment, estimates of future cash flows, our ability to participate in
policy-making decisions and the rights of the other investors to participate in the decision-making
process and to replace us as manager and/or liquidate the venture, if applicable. Our ability to
correctly assess our influence or control over an entity or determine the primary beneficiary of a
VIE affects the presentation of these entities in our consolidated financial statements.
As of March 31, 2011, we leased ten facilities under triple-net leases with fixed price
purchase options through eight wholly owned, consolidated subsidiaries that have been identified as
VIEs and for which we have been identified as the primary beneficiary. The carrying value of the
facilities was $107.6 million as of March 31, 2011, and the purchase options are exercisable
between 2011 and 2021.
We apply the provisions of ASC Topic 323, Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures
(ASC 323), to investments in joint ventures. Investments in entities that we do not consolidate
but for which we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial
policies are reported under the equity method. Under the equity method of accounting, our share of
the entitys earnings or losses is included in our operating results.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ
materially from those estimates.
Segment Reporting
We report our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic
280, Segment Reporting. We operate in two segments based on our investment and leasing activities:
triple-net leases and multi-tenant leases (see Note 17).
Revenue Recognition
We derive the majority of our revenue from leases related to our real estate investments and a
much smaller portion of our revenue from mortgage loans, other financing activities and other
miscellaneous income. Revenue is recognized when it is realized or is realizable and earned.
7
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
Rental income from operating leases is recognized in accordance with the provisions of ASC
Topic 840, Leases, and ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. Our leases generally contain annual rent
escalators. Many of our leases contain non-contingent rent escalators for which we recognize income
on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Recognizing income on a straight-line basis requires
us to calculate the total non-contingent rent to be paid over the life of a lease and to recognize
the revenue evenly over that life. This method results in rental income in the early years of a
lease being higher than actual cash received, creating a straight-line rent receivable asset
included in the caption Other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. At some point during the
lease, depending on its terms, the cash rent payments eventually exceed the straight-line rent
which results in the straight-line rent receivable asset decreasing to zero over the remainder of
the lease term. Certain leases contain rent escalators contingent on revenues or other factors,
including increases based on changes in the Consumer Price Index. Such revenue increases are
recognized as the related contingencies are met.
We assess the collectability of straight-line rent in accordance with the applicable
accounting standards and our reserve policy and defer recognition of straight-line rent if its
collectability is not reasonably assured. Our assessment of the collectability of straight-line
rent is based on several factors, including the financial strength of the tenant and any
guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the facility, the historical payment
pattern of the tenant and the type of facility, among others. If our evaluation of these factors
indicates we may not receive the rent payments due in the future, we defer recognition of the
straight-line rental income and, depending on the circumstances, we will provide a reserve against
the previously recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for a portion, up to its full value,
that we estimate may not be recoverable. If we change our assumptions or estimates regarding the
collectability of future rent payments required by a lease, we may adjust our reserve to increase
or reduce the rental revenue recognized, and/or to increase or reduce the reserve against the
existing straight-line rent receivable balance.
We recorded $2.4 million and $1.7 million of revenues in excess of cash received during the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We had straight-line rent receivables,
net of reserves, recorded under the caption Other assets on our consolidated balance sheets of
$41.8 million at March 31, 2011 and $39.3 million at December 31, 2010, net of reserves of $120.3
million and $114.7 million, respectively. We evaluate the collectability of the straight-line rent
receivable balances on an ongoing basis and provide reserves against receivables we believe may not
be fully recoverable. The ultimate amount of straight-line rent we realize could vary from the
amounts currently recorded.
Interest income from loans, including discounts and premiums, is recognized using the
effective interest method when collectability is reasonably assured. The effective interest method
is applied on a loan-by-loan basis, and discounts and premiums are recognized as yield adjustments
over the term of the related loans. We recognize interest income on impaired loans to the extent
our estimate of the fair value of the collateral is sufficient to support the balance of the loans,
other receivables and all related accrued interest. Once the total of the loans, other receivables
and all related accrued interest is equal to our estimate of the fair value of the collateral, we
recognize interest income on a cash basis. We provide reserves against impaired loans to the extent
our total investment exceeds our estimate of the fair value of the loan collateral.
We recognize sales of facilities upon closing. Payments received from purchasers prior to
closing are recorded as deposits. Gains on facilities sold are recognized using the full accrual
method upon closing when the
requirements of gain recognition on sale of real estate under the provisions of ASC 360 are
met, including: the collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured; we have received
adequate initial investment from the buyer; we are not obligated to perform significant activities
after the sale to earn the gain; and other profit recognition criteria have been satisfied. Gains
may be deferred in whole or in part until the sales satisfy these requirements. We had $15.1
million and $20.3 million of deferred gains included in the caption Mortgage loans receivable,
net at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Gains on facilities sold to unconsolidated joint ventures in which we maintain an ownership
interest are included in income from continuing operations, and the portion of the gain
representing our retained ownership interest in the joint venture is deferred and included in the
caption Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. We had $15.3
million of such deferred gains at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. All other gains are
included in discontinued operations.
8
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
Investments in Real Estate
We record properties at cost and use the straight-line method of depreciation for buildings
and improvements over their estimated remaining useful lives of up to 40 years, generally 20 to 40
years depending on factors including building type, age, quality and location. We review and adjust
useful lives periodically. Depreciation expense from continuing operations was $33.9 million and
$27.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
We allocate purchase prices of properties in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 805,
Business Combinations (ASC 805), which require that the acquisition method of accounting be used
for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination.
ASC 805 also establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we
incurred $5.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively, of merger and acquisition costs that are
included on our consolidated income statements.
The allocation of the cost between land, building and, if applicable, equipment and intangible
assets and liabilities, and the determination of the useful life of a property are based on
managements estimates, which are based in part on independent appraisals or other consultants
reports. For our triple-net leased facilities, the allocation is made as if the property was
vacant, and a significant portion of the cost of each property is allocated to buildings. This
amount generally approximates 90% of the total property value. Historically, we have generally
acquired properties and simultaneously entered into a new market rate lease for the entire property
with one tenant. For our multi-tenant medical office buildings, the percentage allocated to
buildings may be substantially lower as allocations are made to assets such as lease-up intangible
assets, above market tenant and ground lease intangible assets and in-place lease intangible assets
(collectively, Intangible assets) included on our consolidated balance sheets and/or below market
tenant and ground lease intangible liabilities included in the caption Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.
We calculate depreciation and amortization on equipment and lease costs using the
straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of up to five years or the lease term,
whichever is appropriate. We amortize intangible assets and liabilities over the remaining lease
terms of the respective leases to real estate amortization expense or medical office building
operating rent, as appropriate. We review and adjust useful lives periodically.
We capitalize direct costs, including interest costs, associated with the development and
construction of real estate assets while substantive activities are ongoing to prepare the assets
for their intended use.
Asset Impairment
We review our long-lived assets individually on a quarterly basis to determine if there are
indicators of impairment in accordance with the provisions of ASC 360. Indicators may include,
among others, a tenants
inability to make rent payments, operating losses or negative operating trends at the facility
level, notification by a tenant that it will not renew its lease, or a decision to dispose of an
asset or adverse changes in the fair value of any of our properties. For operating assets, if
indicators of impairment exist, we compare the undiscounted cash flows from the expected use of the
property to its net book value to determine if impairment exists. The evaluation of the
undiscounted cash flows from the related lease agreement and expected use of the property is highly
subjective and is based in part on various factors and assumptions, including, but not limited to,
historical operating results, available market information and known trends and market/economic
conditions that may affect the property, as well as estimates of future operating income,
occupancy, rental rates, leasing demand and competition. If the sum of the future estimated
undiscounted cash flows is higher than the current net book value, we conclude no impairment
exists. If the sum of the future estimated undiscounted cash flows is lower than its current net
book value, we recognize an impairment loss for the difference between the net book value of the
asset and its estimated fair value. To the extent we decide to sell an asset, we recognize an
impairment loss if the current net book value of the asset exceeds its fair value less selling
costs.
9
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture
may exceed the fair value. If it is determined that a decline in the fair value of our investment
in an unconsolidated joint venture is other-than-temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below
its carrying value, an impairment is recorded. The determination of the fair value of investments
in unconsolidated joint ventures involves significant judgment. Our estimates consider all
available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value of the expected future cash flows
discounted at market rates, general economic conditions and trends and other relevant factors.
The above analyses require us to determine whether there are indicators of impairment for
individual assets or investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, to estimate the most likely
stream of cash flows from operating assets and to determine the fair value of assets that are
impaired or held for sale. If our assumptions, projections or estimates regarding an asset change
in the future, we may have to record an impairment charge to reduce or further reduce the net book
value of such individual asset or investment in unconsolidated joint venture.
No impairment charges were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2010.
Collectability of Receivables
We evaluate the collectability of our rent, mortgage and other loans and other receivables on
a regular basis based on factors including, among others, payment history, the financial strength
of the borrower and any guarantors, the value of the underlying collateral, the operations and
operating trends of the underlying collateral, if any, the asset type and current economic
conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates we may not recover the full value of the
receivable, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be
recovered. This analysis requires us to determine whether there are factors indicating a receivable
may not be fully collectible and to estimate the amount of the receivable that may not be
collected. We had reserves included in the caption Receivables, net on our consolidated balance
sheets of $13.7 million as of March 31, 2011 and $14.9 million as of December 31, 2010.
10
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
For our mortgage loans, the evaluation emphasizes the operations, operating trends, financial
performance and value of the underlying collateral, and for our other loans, the evaluation
emphasizes the financial strength of the borrower and any guarantors. Our quarter-end evaluation
was performed using operating and financial information as of February 28, 2011, and based on this
evaluation, our mortgage and other loans are grouped into three classes good standing, watch
list and special monitoring. For loans classified as good standing, the likelihood of loss is
remote, and while borrowers may be current on all required payments for loans classified as watch
list or special monitoring, there are other factors considered in our evaluation which cause the
likelihood of loss to be reasonably possible. Our analysis did not identify any mortgage loans for
which we believe we may not recover the full value of the receivable, and as such, no reserves for
mortgage loans receivable have been recorded as of March 31, 2011. Our analysis identified certain
other loans for which we believe we may not recover the full
value of the receivable, and we have recorded $5.9 million of reserves for other loans
receivable as of March 31, 2011. The balances of mortgage and other loans by class as of March 31,
2011 were as follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
and Discounts |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Mortgage loans receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good standing |
|
$ |
248,097 |
|
|
$ |
(14,725 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
233,372 |
|
Watch list |
|
|
23,846 |
|
|
|
(1,139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,707 |
|
Special monitoring |
|
|
6,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
278,539 |
|
|
$ |
(15,864 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
262,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Other loans receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good standing |
|
$ |
62,623 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
62,623 |
|
Watch list |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
(1,406 |
) |
|
|
3,594 |
|
Special monitoring |
|
|
4,846 |
|
|
|
(4,446 |
) |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,469 |
|
|
$ |
(5,852 |
) |
|
$ |
66,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the changes in reserves for other loans receivable during the
three months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
(6,057 |
) |
Reversal of reserves |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
(5,852 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include short-term investments with original maturities of three
months or less when purchased.
Capital Raising Costs
Deferred financing costs are included in the caption Other assets on our consolidated
balance sheets and are amortized as a component of interest expense over the terms of the related
borrowings using a method that approximates a level yield. Deferred financing cost amortization is
included in the caption Interest expense on our consolidated income statements. Costs incurred in
connection with the issuance of common stock are recorded as a reduction of capital in excess of
par value.
Derivatives
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to financial market risks, including interest
rate risk on our interest-bearing liabilities. We endeavor to limit these risks by following
established risk management policies, procedures and strategies, including, on occasion, the use of
derivative instruments. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
11
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
Derivative instruments are recorded on our consolidated balance sheets as assets or
liabilities based on each instruments fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments are recognized currently in earnings, unless the derivative instrument meets the
criteria for hedge accounting contained in ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815). If
the derivative instruments meet the criteria for a cash flow hedge, the gains and losses recognized
upon changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are recorded in other comprehensive
income. Gains and losses on a cash flow hedge are reclassified into earnings when the forecasted
transaction affects earnings. A contract that is designated as a hedge of an anticipated
transaction which is no longer likely to occur is immediately recognized in earnings.
For investments in entities reported under the equity method of accounting, we record our pro
rata share of the entitys derivative instruments fair value, other comprehensive income or loss
and gains and losses determined in accordance with ASC 323 and ASC 815 as applicable.
Redeemable Limited Partnership Unitholders
NHP/PMB L.P. (NHP/PMB) is a limited partnership that we formed in February 2008 to acquire
properties from entities affiliated with Pacific Medical Buildings LLC. We consolidate NHP/PMB
consistent with the provisions of ASC 810, as our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner
and exercises control. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, third party investors owned
2,176,700 Class A limited partnership units in NHP/PMB (OP Units), which represented 32.0% of the
total units outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. As of March 31, 2011 and December
31, 2010, 4,619,330 Class B limited partnership units in NHP/PMB were outstanding, respectively,
all of which were held by our subsidiaries.
After a one year holding period, the OP Units are exchangeable for cash or, at our option,
shares of our common stock equal to the REIT Shares Amount per OP Unit. As of March 31, 2011, the
REIT Shares Amount was 1.000. We have entered into a registration rights agreement with the holders
of the OP Units which, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, obligates us to
register the shares of common stock that we may issue in exchange for such OP Units. As
registration rights are outside of our control, the redeemable OP unitholder interests are
classified outside of permanent equity on our consolidated balance sheets. As of March 31, 2011,
the OP Units had been outstanding for one year or longer and were exchangeable for cash of $92.6
million.
We applied the provisions of ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, to reflect
the redeemable OP unitholder interests at the greater of cost or fair value. As of March 31, 2011,
the fair value of the OP Units exceeded the cost basis by $31.2 million, and the adjustment was
recorded through capital in excess of par value. The value of the OP Units held by redeemable OP
unitholder interests was $92.6 million and $79.2 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively.
Noncontrolling Interests
We have four consolidated joint ventures in which we have equity interests, ranging from 71%
to 95%, in nine multi-tenant medical office buildings and one development project.
NHP/PMB has equity interests, ranging from 50% to 69%, in three joint ventures which each own
one multi-tenant medical office building. The joint ventures are consolidated by NHP/PMB, and we
consolidate NHP/PMB in our consolidated financial statements.
We also have six partnerships in which we have equity interests, ranging from 51% to 96%, in
18 triple-net leased facilities. We consolidate the partnerships in our consolidated financial
statements.
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 718,
Compensation-Stock Compensation, which require stock-based compensation awards to be valued at the
fair value
on the date of grant and amortized as an expense over the vesting period and require any
dividend equivalents earned to be treated as dividends for financial reporting purposes. Net income
reflects stock-based compensation expense of $1.8 million and $1.6 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
12
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
Income Taxes
We intend to continue to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, and
accordingly, no provision has been made for federal income taxes. However, we are subject to
certain state and local taxes on our income and/or property, and these amounts are included in the
expense caption General and administrative on our consolidated income statements.
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, significant
management judgment is required to estimate our compliance with REIT requirements. Our
determinations are based on interpretation of tax laws, and our conclusions may have an impact on
the income tax expense recognized. Adjustments to income tax expense may be required as a result of
i) audits conducted by federal and state tax authorities; ii) our ability to qualify as a REIT;
iii) the potential for built-in-gain recognized related to prior-tax-free acquisitions of C
corporations; and iv) changes in tax laws. Adjustments required in any given period are included in
income, other than adjustments to income tax liabilities acquired in business combinations, which
would be adjusted through goodwill.
Earnings per Share (EPS)
Basic EPS is computed by dividing income from continuing operations available to common
stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding. Income from continuing operations
available to common stockholders is calculated by deducting amounts attributable to noncontrolling
interests, amounts attributable to participating securities and dividends declared on preferred
stock from income from continuing operations.
We apply the provisions of ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share, which require that the two-class
method of computing basic earnings per share be applied when there are unvested share-based payment
awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends outstanding during a reporting period. These
participating securities share in undistributed earnings with common stockholders for purposes of
calculating basic earnings per share.
Diluted EPS includes the effect of any potential shares outstanding, which for us is comprised
of dilutive stock options, other share-settled compensation plans and, if the effect is dilutive,
our 7.75% Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred Stock), which was
redeemed on January 18, 2010, and/or OP Units. The dilutive effect of stock options and other
share-settled compensation plans that do not contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends is
calculated using the treasury stock method with an offset from expected proceeds upon exercise of
the stock options and unrecognized compensation expense.
Fair Value
We apply the provisions of ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820)
to our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and to our
nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not required or permitted to be measured at fair value
on a recurring basis.
13
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC 820 also specifies
a three-level hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs reflect assumptions
other market participants would use based upon market data obtained from independent sources
(observable inputs) or reflect our own assumptions of market participant valuation (unobservable
inputs) and requires the use of observable inputs if such data is available without undue cost and
effort. The hierarchy is as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs, including quoted prices
for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar
instruments in markets that are not active and other derived valuations with significant
inputs or value drivers that are observable or can be corroborated by observable inputs
in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs or derived valuations with significant inputs or
value drivers that are unobservable. |
Fair value measurements at March 31, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Financial assets |
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
(5,549 |
) |
|
|
(5,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
12,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable OP unitholder interests |
|
|
92,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
104,736 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
104,736 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts related to our deferred compensation plan are invested in various financial assets,
and the fair value of the corresponding assets and liabilities is based on market quotes. Interest
rate swaps are valued using standard derivative pricing models that consider forward yield curves
and discount rates. OP Units are exchangeable for cash or, at our option, shares of our common
stock equal to the REIT Shares Amount. As such, the fair value of OP Units outstanding at March 31,
2011 is based on the closing price of our common stock on March 31, 2011, which was $42.53 per
share.
The provisions of ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, provide companies with an option to
report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value and establish presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different
measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. We have not elected to apply
the fair value option to any specific financial assets or liabilities.
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short
maturities of these instruments. The fair value of mortgage and other loans receivable are based
upon the estimates of management and on rates currently prevailing for comparable loans. The fair
value of long-term debt is estimated based on discounting future cash flows utilizing current rates
offered to us for debt of a similar type and remaining maturity.
The table below details the book value and fair value for mortgage and other loans receivable
and the components of long-term debt at March 31, 2011. These fair value estimates are not
necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized upon disposition of these financial
instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Mortgage loans receivable |
|
$ |
278,538 |
|
|
$ |
280,786 |
|
Other loans receivable |
|
$ |
72,469 |
|
|
$ |
65,191 |
|
Unsecured senior credit facility |
|
$ |
245,000 |
|
|
$ |
245,000 |
|
Senior notes |
|
$ |
991,633 |
|
|
$ |
1,084,862 |
|
Notes and bonds payable |
|
$ |
365,164 |
|
|
$ |
357,188 |
|
14
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
Impact of New Accounting Standards Updates
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-06, Improving
Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06). ASU 2010-06 adds new requirements for
disclosures of significant transfers into and out of Levels 1, 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy,
the reasons for the transfers and the policy for determining when transfers are recognized. ASU
2010-06 also adds new requirements for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and
settlements on a gross rather than net basis relating to the reconciliation of the beginning and
ending balances of Level 3 recurring fair value measurements. It also clarifies the level of
disaggregation to require disclosures by class rather than by major category of assets and
liabilities and clarifies that a description of inputs and valuation techniques used to measure
fair value is required for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements classified as
Level 2 or 3. ASU 2010-06 became effective January 1, 2010 except for the requirements to provide
the Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis which became
effective January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on our
results of operations or financial position.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures About the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (ASU 2010-20). ASU 2010-20 amends ASC Topic 310,
Receivables, to require additional disclosures regarding credit quality and the allowance for
credit losses related to financing receivables, including credit quality indicators and past due
and modification information. Disclosures must be disaggregated by segment and class. The
disclosures as of the end of a reporting period became effective December 31, 2010, and the
disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period became effective January 1, 2011.
The adoption of ASU 2010-20 did not have a material impact on our results of operations or
financial position.
3. Real Estate Properties
As of March 31, 2011, we had investments in the following consolidated facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Assisted and independent living facilities |
|
|
268 |
|
Skilled nursing facilities |
|
|
183 |
|
Continuing care retirement communities |
|
|
10 |
|
Specialty hospitals |
|
|
7 |
|
Triple-net medical office buildings |
|
|
24 |
|
Multi-tenant medical office buildings, including 21 owned by consolidated joint ventures (see Note 5) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
|
|
We lease our owned senior housing and long-term care facilities and certain medical office
buildings to single tenants under triple-net, and in most cases, master leases that are
accounted for as operating leases. These leases generally have an initial term of up to 20 years
and generally have two or more multiple-year renewal options. As of March 31, 2011, approximately
87% of these facilities were leased under master leases. In addition, the majority of these leases
contain cross-collateralization and cross-default provisions tied to other leases with the same
tenant, as well as grouped lease renewals and grouped purchase options. As of March 31, 2011,
leases covering 431 triple-net leased facilities were backed by security deposits consisting of
irrevocable letters of credit or cash totaling $89.3 million. Under the terms of the leases, the
tenant is responsible for all maintenance, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures on
the leased properties. As of March 31, 2011, leases covering 399 facilities contained provisions
for property tax impounds, and leases covering 284 facilities contained provisions for capital
expenditure impounds. We generally lease medical office buildings to multiple tenants under
separate non-triple-net leases, where we are responsible for many of the associated operating
expenses (although many of these are, or can effectively be, passed through to the tenants).
However, some of the medical office buildings are subject to triple-net leases, where the lessees
are responsible for the associated operating expenses.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we acquired six skilled nursing facilities and
one assisted and independent living facility subject to triple-net leases and one multi-tenant
medical office building in three
separate transactions for an aggregate investment of $121.4 million, including a $12.0 million
contingent purchase price obligation which is included in the caption Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2011.
As of March 31, 2011, we had entered into agreements to develop two assisted and independent
living facilities. Costs of $2.2 million were incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2011
and are included in the caption Development in progress on our consolidated balance sheets.
15
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we funded $3.3 million in expansions,
construction and capital improvements at certain facilities in our triple-net leases segment in
accordance with existing lease provisions. Such expansions, construction and capital improvements
generally result in an increase in the minimum rents earned by us on these facilities either at the
time of funding or upon completion of the project. As of March 31, 2011, we had committed to fund
additional expansions, construction and capital improvements of $10.9 million. During the three
months ended March 31, 2011, we also funded $0.3 million in capital and tenant improvements at
certain multi-tenant medical office buildings.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we sold one skilled nursing facility not
previously transferred to assets held for sale for net cash proceeds of $7.5 million that resulted
in a gain of $5.4 million which is included the caption Gain on sale of facilities, net in
Discontinued operations on our consolidated income statements.
No impairment charges were recorded on our real estate properties during three months ended
March 31, 2011 or 2010.
Hearthstone Senior Living
In February 2011, our tenant, Hearthstone Senior Services, L.P. (Hearthstone), notified us
that it would be unable to pay the rent then due under its leases with us, and asked us to amend
certain terms of the leases to make rents achievable. In order to substantially increase the
ability of Hearthstone to meet its future obligations, and thereby
protecting our interest, we agreed to certain modifications of the
terms of our leases with Hearthstone that include, among other things, a reduction in the aggregate
rent payable by $7.4 million for the lease year ending February 2012, and by $6.4 million for
subsequent lease years through 2021. After giving effect to these reductions, the aggregate rent
payable by Hearthstone is $31.7 million for the first lease year, $33.7 million for the second
lease year and increases by 3% each year thereafter. In connection with the lease modifications, we
also obtained the right to terminate any and all of our leases with Hearthstone at any time without
cause. We hold a $6.0 million letter of credit that secures Hearthstones payment obligations to
us. However, it is possible that the letter of credit may not be sufficient to compensate us for
any future losses or expenses that may arise if Hearthstone defaults under its leases with us.
Other terms of our modified arrangements with Hearthstone include:
|
|
|
We have eliminated supplemental rent obligations, except for supplemental
rent accrued prior to February 1, 2011, which totals $6.0 million and becomes payable (i)
in full upon an event of default by Hearthstone for which NHP chooses to exercise its
remedies, (ii) in full upon a sale of Hearthstone and (iii) in part, if we exercise our
right to terminate the leases with Hearthstone without cause. |
|
|
|
We will be entitled to receive revenue participation rent, payable monthly
and calculated as 20% of incremental gross revenue over the base month of February 2011,
commencing February 1, 2012 and capped in any one year at $6.4 million (subject to annual
increases of 3%). |
|
|
|
Upon exercise of our right to terminate the leases without cause, Hearthstone
must enter into an operations transfer agreement with a successor operator to allow for
an efficient transfer of operations to our designee. |
|
|
|
If we exercise the right to terminate the Hearthstone leases without cause,
upon transition of the facilities to a licensed replacement operator we must release to
Hearthstone a portion of the $6.0 million letter of credit. The amount released is $3.0
million if the transition occurs prior to September 1, 2011, and increases by $1 million
for every six month period thereafter. |
|
|
|
The Chief Executive Officer of Hearthstone has executed a guaranty in our
favor that would obligate him to reimburse us the amount of any (i) distributions in
excess of permitted amounts, (ii) compensation paid to him in excess of permitted
amounts, and (iii) losses arising from customary bad boy acts such as fraud, or
misappropriation of funds, rents or insurance proceeds.
|
16
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
4. Mortgage Loans Receivable
As of March 31, 2011, we held 19 mortgage loans receivable secured by:
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-tenant medical office buildings |
|
|
27 |
|
Skilled nursing facilities |
|
|
20 |
|
Assisted and independent living facilities |
|
|
7 |
|
Continuing care retirement communities |
|
|
1 |
|
Land parcel |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011, the mortgage loans receivable had an aggregate principal balance of
$278.5 million and are reflected in our consolidated balance sheets net of aggregate deferred gains
and discounts totaling $15.9 million, with individual outstanding principal balances ranging from
$0.7 million to $83.1 million and maturities ranging from 2010 to 2031. We had a $6.6 million
mortgage loan which matured during 2010 and is expected to be repaid in full during the second
quarter of 2011. The borrower was current on all interest payments as of March 31, 2011.
In connection with the funding of a mortgage loan secured by a skilled nursing facility during
2010, we agreed to fund up to $10.9 million to expand the facility. During the three months ended
March 31, 2011, we funded $1.3 million under the agreement.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we also funded $0.1 million on other existing
loans.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, one mortgage loan to Brookdale secured by five
assisted and independent living facilities with a carrying value of $28.3 million (net of a
deferred gain of $4.7 million) was prepaid. The deferred gain was recognized and included in the
caption Gain on sale of facilities, net in Discontinued operations on our consolidated income
statements.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we also recognized a deferred gain on sale of
$0.5 million under the installment method for facilities previously sold to the tenants for which
we provided a mortgage loan that matures in 2013. The gain is included in the caption Interest and
other income on our consolidated income statements.
5. Medical Office Building Joint Ventures
As of March 31, 2011, NHP/PMB owned 12 multi-tenant medical office buildings, three of which
are owned through consolidated joint ventures. During the three months ended March 31, 2011,
NHP/PMB funded $49,000 in capital and tenant improvements at certain facilities, and cash
distributions of $1.0 million and $2.6 million were made to Class A and Class B unitholders,
respectively.
As of March 31, 2011, we owned nine multi-tenant medical office buildings through consolidated
joint ventures. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the joint ventures funded $0.5
million in capital and tenant improvements at certain facilities. During the three months ended
March 31, 2011, operating cash distributions from the joint ventures of $0.1 million were made to
us.
As of March 31, 2011, we owned one development project through a consolidated joint venture.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the joint venture incurred costs of $1.9 million
which are included in the caption Development in progress on our consolidated balance sheets.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the joint venture obtained a $36.5 million
construction loan under which $4.2 million has been drawn and remains outstanding at March 31,
2011. No cash distributions were made during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
17
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
All intercompany balances with our consolidated joint ventures have been eliminated for
purposes of our consolidated financial statements.
6. Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The following table sets forth the amounts from our unconsolidated joint ventures included in
the caption Income from unconsolidated joint ventures on our consolidated income statements for
the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Management fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State pension fund investor |
|
$ |
1,201 |
|
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
NHP share of net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State pension fund investor |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
PMB Real Estate Services LLC |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
PMB SB 399-401 East Highland LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,465 |
|
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Pension Fund Investor
As of March 31, 2011, we owned interests in 34 triple-net leased facilities through a joint
venture with a state pension fund investor. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we
received distributions of $1.0 million from the joint venture.
PMB Real Estate Services LLC
In 2008, we entered into an agreement with Pacific Medical Buildings LLC to acquire a 50%
interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC (PMBRES), a full service property management company. An
additional payment equal to six times the Normalized Net Operating Profit, as defined, of PMBRES
for 2010 was to be made on or before March 31, 2011. During 2010, PMBRES had a net operating loss,
and as such, no additional payment was made on or before March 31, 2011. PMBRES provides property
management services for 33 multi-tenant medical office buildings that we own or in which we have an
ownership interest.
PMB SB 399-401 East Highland LLC
In 2008, we acquired a noncontrolling interest in PMB SB 399-401 East Highland LLC (PMB SB),
an entity that owned two multi-tenant medical office buildings, and as of March 1, 2010, we
acquired the remaining interest in PMB SB. In connection with the acquisition, we re-measured our
previously held equity interest at the
acquisition date fair value based on an independent consultants report and recognized a net
gain on the re-measurement of $0.6 million which is included in the caption Interest and other
income on our consolidated income statements.
18
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
7. Assets Held for Sale
During 2010, we transferred one skilled nursing facility and one medical office building to
assets held for sale. The skilled nursing facility was sold in January 2011 for net cash proceeds
of $0.8 million, resulting in a gain of $0.5 million which is included in the caption Gain on sale
of facilities, net in Discontinued operations on our consolidated income statements. The tenant
of the medical office building has filed bankruptcy, and an impairment charge of $15.0 million was
recognized during 2010 in discontinued operations based on broker estimates of fair value,
comparable sales in the local submarket and an unsolicited cash offer received during 2010. We
intend to sell the medical office building within one year.
8. Intangible Assets and Liabilities
Intangible assets include items such as lease-up intangible assets, above market tenant and
ground lease intangible assets and in-place lease intangible assets. Intangible liabilities include
below market tenant and ground lease intangible liabilities and are included in the caption
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. As of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, intangible assets and liabilities consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Gross intangible assets |
|
$ |
202,673 |
|
|
$ |
211,134 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(47,290 |
) |
|
|
(47,896 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
155,383 |
|
|
$ |
163,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross intangible liabilities |
|
$ |
18,227 |
|
|
$ |
18,643 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(5,461 |
) |
|
|
(5,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,766 |
|
|
$ |
13,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortization of above/below market lease intangibles is included in the caption Medical
office building operating rent on our consolidated income statements. The amortization of other
intangible assets and liabilities is included in the caption Depreciation and amortization on our
consolidated income statements. The following table sets forth amounts included on our consolidated
income statements related to the amortization of intangible assets and liabilities for the periods
presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above/below market lease intangibles |
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
(62 |
) |
Other intangible assets and liabilities |
|
|
4,529 |
|
|
|
4,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,663 |
|
|
$ |
3,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
9. Other Assets
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, other assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Other receivables, net of reserves of $5.9 million and $6.1 million at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
$ |
66,617 |
|
|
$ |
68,200 |
|
Straight-line rent receivables, net of reserves of $120.3 million and $114.7
million
at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
41,771 |
|
|
|
39,331 |
|
Prepaid ground leases |
|
|
12,741 |
|
|
|
12,804 |
|
Investments and restricted funds |
|
|
12,741 |
|
|
|
12,567 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
12,161 |
|
|
|
11,157 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
8,138 |
|
|
|
8,566 |
|
Capitalized lease and loan origination costs |
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
Other |
|
|
8,023 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
169,124 |
|
|
$ |
158,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other receivables at both March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are two unsecured
loans to Emeritus Corporation in the amount of $21.4 million and $30.0 million. The loans mature in
March 2017.
10. Debt
Unsecured Senior Credit Facility
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had $245.0 million and $175.0 million,
respectively, outstanding on our $700.0 million revolving unsecured senior credit facility. At our
option, borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the prime rate (3.25% at March 31,
2011) or applicable LIBOR plus 0.70% (0.95% at March 31, 2011). We pay a facility fee of 0.15% per
annum on the total commitment under the agreement. The credit facility matures on December 15,
2011. As of March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit facility.
Senior Notes
The aggregate principal amount of notes outstanding at each of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010 was $991.6 million, and the weighted average interest rate on the notes was 6.47%. The
weighted average maturity was 3.7 years and 4.0 years as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively.
Notes and Bonds Payable
The aggregate principal amount of notes and bonds payable at March 31, 2011 was $365.2
million. Notes and bonds payable are due through the year 2036, at interest rates ranging from
0.83% to 8.63% and are secured by real estate properties with an aggregate net book value as of
March 31, 2011 of $527.6 million. As of March 31, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on the
notes and bonds payable was 5.53% and the weighted average maturity was 7.0 years. As of December
31, 2010, the aggregate amount of notes and bonds payable was $362.6 million, and the notes and
bonds payable had a weighted average interest rate of 5.59% and a weighted average maturity of 7.2
years.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, our consolidated joint venture which owns a
development project obtained a $36.5 million construction loan under which $4.2 million has been
drawn and remains outstanding at March 31, 2011.
20
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
Debt Maturities
The principal balances of our debt as of March 31, 2011 mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Senior |
|
|
Notes and Bonds |
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Facility |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Payable |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
245,000 |
|
|
$ |
339,040 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
584,040 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,950 |
|
|
|
38,128 |
|
|
|
111,078 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,850 |
|
|
|
41,961 |
|
|
|
311,811 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,383 |
|
|
|
37,383 |
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
234,420 |
|
|
|
35,115 |
|
|
|
269,535 |
|
Thereafter (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,373 |
|
|
|
212,577 |
|
|
|
287,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
245,000 |
|
|
$ |
991,633 |
|
|
$ |
365,164 |
|
|
$ |
1,601,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
There are $52.4 million of senior notes due in 2037 which may be put
back to us at their face amount at the option of the holder on October
1 of any of the following years: 2012, 2017 or 2027. There are $23.0
million of senior notes due in 2038 which may be put back to us at
their face amount at the option of the holder on July 7 of any of the
following years: 2013, 2018, 2023 or 2028. |
11. Stockholders Equity
Common Stock
We have entered into sales agreements from time to time with agents to sell shares of our
common stock through an at-the-market equity offering program. As of March 31, 2011, approximately
1,322,000 shares of common stock were available to be sold pursuant to our at-the-market equity
offering program. However, under the terms of the February 27, 2011 merger agreement with Ventas,
Inc. (see Note 18), we are not allowed to issue any shares of common stock, including any shares
sold through our at-the-market equity offering program, during the pendency of the merger. No
shares were issued through our at-the-market equity offering program during the three months ended
March 31, 2011.
Prior to March 31, 2011, we sponsored a dividend reinvestment plan that enabled existing
stockholders to purchase additional shares of common stock by automatically reinvesting all or part
of the cash dividends paid on their shares of common stock at a discount ranging from 0% to 5%,
determined by us from time to time in accordance with the plan. During the period from January 1,
2011 to March 31, 2011, we issued approximately 153,000 shares of common stock, at an average price
of $39.89 per share, resulting in proceeds of approximately $6.1 million. Effective as of March 31,
2011, the dividend reinvestment plan was suspended in accordance with its terms.
12. Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Certain of our share-based payment awards are considered participating securities which
requires the use of the two-class method for the computation of basic and diluted EPS.
21
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
Diluted EPS also includes the effect of any potential shares outstanding, which for us is
comprised of dilutive stock options, other share-settled compensation plans and, if the effect is
dilutive, Series B Preferred Stock, which was redeemed on January 18, 2010, and/or OP Units. The
Series B Preferred Stock was not dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2010. There were
150,700 and 270,100 stock options that would not be dilutive for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively. The calculation below excludes 81,181 restricted stock units that
would not be dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The calculation below excludes
27,000 restricted stock units, 8,700 shares of restricted stock and 6,900 stock appreciation rights
that would not be dilutive
for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The following table sets forth the components of
the basic and diluted EPS calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per |
|
|
|
share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
39,574 |
|
|
$ |
30,320 |
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Net income attributable to participating securities |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for Basic and Diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
$ |
39,369 |
|
|
$ |
30,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for Basic and Diluted EPS from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
10,740 |
|
|
$ |
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
126,474 |
|
|
|
117,048 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
Other share-settled compensation plans |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
OP Units |
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
128,980 |
|
|
|
119,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Discontinued operations attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Discontinued operations attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
13. Discontinued Operations
ASC 360 requires the operating results of any assets with their own identifiable cash flows
that are disposed of or held for sale and in which we have no continuing interest be removed from
income from continuing operations and reported as discontinued operations. The operating results
for any such assets for any prior periods presented must also be reclassified as discontinued
operations. If we have a continuing involvement, as in the sales to our unconsolidated joint
venture, the operating results remain in continuing operations. The following table details the
operating results reclassified to discontinued operations for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Derivatives
During August 2010, we entered into six 12-month forward-starting interest rate swap
agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $250.0 million at a weighted average rate of 3.16%.
We entered into these swap agreements in order to hedge the expected interest payments associated
with fixed rate debt forecasted to be issued in 2011. The swap agreements each have an effective
date of August 1, 2011 and a termination date of August 1, 2021. We expect to settle the swap
agreements when the forecasted debt is issued. We assessed the effectiveness of these swap
agreements as hedges at inception and on March 31, 2011 and consider these swap agreements to be
highly effective cash flow hedges. The swap agreements are recorded under the caption Other
assets on our consolidated balance sheets at their aggregate estimated fair value of $12.2 million
and $11.2 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
During 2006 and 2007, we entered into and settled Treasury lock agreements to hedge the
expected interest payments associated with a portion of our senior notes. The settlement amounts
were recorded as other comprehensive income and are being amortized over the life of the debt as a
yield reduction. We expect to record $0.4 million of amortization during the next 12 months.
The following table sets forth amounts included on our consolidated income statements related
to the amortization of the Treasury lock agreements for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Treasury lock agreements |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
2006 Treasury lock agreements |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2008, the unconsolidated joint venture we have with a state pension fund investor
entered into an interest rate swap contract. The fair value of this contract at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 was $11.4 million and $12.8 million, respectively, which is included as a
liability on the joint ventures balance sheets. As of March 31, 2011, we had recorded our pro rata
share of the unconsolidated joint ventures accumulated other comprehensive loss related to this
contract of $2.8 million.
23
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
15. Comprehensive Income
The following table sets forth the computation of comprehensive income for the periods
presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50,314 |
|
|
$ |
31,239 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of gains on Treasury lock agreements |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
Pro rata share of accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) from unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
51,540 |
|
|
|
30,677 |
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,777 |
|
|
$ |
30,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Income Taxes
The provisions of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, which clarify the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in financial statements and prescribe a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return became
effective January 1, 2007. No amounts have been recorded for unrecognized tax benefits or related
interest expense and penalties. The taxable periods ending December 31, 2005 through December 31,
2010 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and the tax authorities of the
significant jurisdictions in which we do business.
Hearthstone Acquisition
On June 1, 2006, we acquired the stock of Hearthstone Assisted Living, Inc. (HAL), causing
HAL to become a qualified REIT subsidiary. As a result of the acquisition, we succeeded to HALs
tax attributes, including HALs tax basis in its net assets. Prior to the acquisition, HAL was a
corporation subject to federal and state income taxes. In connection with the acquisition of HAL,
NHP acquired approximately $82.5 million of federal net operating losses (NOLs) which we can
carry forward to future periods and the use of which is subject to annual limitations imposed by
IRC Section 382. While we believe that these NOLs are accurate, any adjustments to HALs tax
returns for periods prior to June 1, 2006 by the Internal Revenue Service could change the amount
of the NOLs that we can utilize. We have used a portion of this amount in 2007 and 2008 and
anticipate using additional amounts in future years. These NOLs are set to expire between 2017 and
2025. NOLs related to various states were also acquired and are set to expire based on the various
laws of the specific states.
In addition, we may be subject to a corporate-level tax on any taxable disposition of HALs
pre-acquisition assets that occurs within ten years after the June 1, 2006 acquisition. The
corporate-level tax would be assessed only to the extent of the built-in gain that existed on the
date of acquisition, based on the fair market value of the asset on June 1, 2006. We do not expect
to dispose of any asset included in the HAL acquisition if such a disposition would result in the
imposition of a material tax liability, and no such sales have taken place through March 31, 2011.
Accordingly, we have not recorded a deferred tax liability associated with this corporate-level
tax. Gains from asset dispositions occurring more than 10 years after the acquisition will not be
subject to this corporate-level tax. However, we may dispose of HAL assets before the 10-year
period if we are able to complete a tax-deferred exchange.
24
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
17. Segment Information
Our operations are organized into two segments triple-net leases and multi-tenant leases.
In the triple-net leases segment, we invest in healthcare related properties and lease the
facilities to unaffiliated tenants under triple-net and generally master leases that transfer
the obligation for all facility operating costs (including maintenance, repairs, taxes, insurance
and capital expenditures) to the tenant. In the multi-tenant leases segment, we invest in
healthcare related properties that have several tenants under separate leases in each building,
thus requiring active management and responsibility for many of the associated operating expenses
(although many of these are, or can effectively be, passed through to the tenants). During 2010 and
the three months ended March 31, 2011, the multi-tenant leases segment was comprised exclusively of
medical office buildings.
Non-segment revenues primarily consist of interest income on mortgages and unsecured loans and
other income. Interest expense, depreciation and amortization and other expenses not attributable
to individual facilities are not allocated to individual segments for purposes of assessing segment
performance. Non-segment assets primarily consist of corporate assets including mortgages and
unsecured loans, investment in unconsolidated joint ventures, cash, deferred financing costs and
other assets not attributable to individual facilities.
Certain items in prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to
current period presentation, including those required by ASC 360 which require the operating
results of any assets with their own identifiable cash flows that are disposed of or held for sale
and in which we have no continuing interest to be removed from income from continuing operations
and reported as discontinued operations. Summary information related to our reportable segments is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triple-net leases |
|
$ |
82,271 |
|
|
$ |
72,200 |
|
Multi-tenant leases |
|
|
29,515 |
|
|
|
21,685 |
|
Non-segment |
|
|
10,588 |
|
|
|
6,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
122,374 |
|
|
$ |
100,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triple-net leases |
|
$ |
82,271 |
|
|
$ |
72,200 |
|
Multi-tenant leases |
|
|
19,157 |
|
|
|
13,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,428 |
|
|
$ |
85,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triple-net leases |
|
$ |
2,737,985 |
|
|
$ |
2,638,261 |
|
Multi-tenant leases |
|
|
930,342 |
|
|
|
937,636 |
|
Non-segment |
|
|
485,518 |
|
|
|
516,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,153,845 |
|
|
$ |
4,092,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net operating income (NOI) is a non-GAAP supplemental financial
measure used to evaluate the operating performance of our facilities.
We define NOI for our triple-net leases segment as rent revenue. For
our multi-tenant leases segment, we define NOI as revenue minus
medical office building operating expenses. In some cases, revenue for
medical office buildings includes expense reimbursements for common
area maintenance charges. NOI excludes interest expense, depreciation
and amortization expense, general and administrative expense and
discontinued operations. We present NOI as it effectively presents our
portfolio on a net rent basis and provides relevant and useful
information as it measures the operating performance at the facility
level on an unleveraged basis. We use NOI to make decisions about
resource allocations and to assess the property level performance of
our properties. Furthermore, we believe that NOI provides investors
relevant and useful information because it measures the operating
performance of our real estate at the property level on an unleveraged
basis. We believe that net income is the GAAP measure that is most
directly comparable to NOI. However, NOI should not be considered as
an alternative to net income as the primary indicator of operating
performance as it excludes the items described above. Additionally,
NOI as presented above may not be comparable to other REITs or
companies as their definitions of NOI may differ from ours. |
25
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
A reconciliation of net income, a GAAP measure, to NOI, a non-conforming GAAP measure, is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50,314 |
|
|
$ |
31,239 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(10,588 |
) |
|
|
(6,963 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
22,771 |
|
|
|
23,590 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
38,674 |
|
|
|
31,290 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
7,365 |
|
|
|
6,980 |
|
Merger and acquisition costs |
|
|
5,097 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(1,465 |
) |
|
|
(1,347 |
) |
Gain on debt extinguishment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
Gain on sale of facilities, net |
|
|
(10,607 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(897 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income from reportable segments |
|
$ |
101,428 |
|
|
$ |
85,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Commitments and Contingencies
Proposed Merger with Ventas
On February 27, 2011, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement)
with Ventas, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Needles Acquisition LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Ventas (Merger Sub).
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, NHP will be merged with and into Merger Sub (the
Merger), with Merger Sub surviving the Merger as a subsidiary of Ventas. Pursuant to the Merger
Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (the Effective Time), each outstanding share of
common stock, other than shares held by any wholly owned subsidiary of NHP, by Ventas or by any
subsidiary of Ventas, will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive 0.7866 shares (the
Exchange Ratio) of common stock of Ventas (Ventas Common Stock).
Upon completion of the Merger, (i) each outstanding stock option will become fully vested and,
in Ventass discretion, either be (A) cashed out based on the option spread or (B) assumed by
Ventas, on the same terms and conditions (subject to adjustment for the exchange ratio), provided
that stock options granted to certain senior executives in February 2011 will be assumed by Ventas
on the same terms and conditions (subject to adjustment for the Exchange Ratio); (ii) each
restricted stock unit will vest in full and be cashed out based on the Exchange Ratio, provided
that (a) restricted stock units granted to certain senior executives in February 2011 will be
assumed by Ventas on the same terms and conditions (subject to adjustment for the Exchange Ratio)
and (b) certain restricted stock units granted to certain senior executives will vest and be
settled in accordance with their terms; (iii) each share of restricted stock will vest in full and
be converted into Ventas Common Stock, based on the Exchange Ratio;
(iv) performance shares will vest under the relevant agreements and will be converted into
Ventas Common Stock based on the Exchange Ratio; and (v) dividend equivalent rights granted in
connection with any award will become fully vested and be paid out.
26
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
We have made customary representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement and have agreed
to customary covenants, including covenants regarding the operation of our business prior to the
closing and covenants prohibiting us from soliciting, providing information or entering into
discussions concerning proposals relating to alternative business combination transactions, except
in limited circumstances relating to unsolicited proposals that constitute, or are reasonably
expected to lead to, a superior proposal.
Consummation of the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including approval of
our stockholders and Ventass stockholders. The Merger Agreement may be terminated under certain
circumstances, including by either party if the Merger has not occurred by October 31, 2011, if an
order is entered prohibiting or disapproving the transaction and the order has become final and
non-appealable, if our stockholders or Ventass stockholders fail to approve the transaction, or
upon a material uncured breach by the other party that would cause the closing conditions not to be
satisfied.
Litigation
From time to time, we are a party to various legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims (as
to some of which we may not be insured) that arise in the normal course of our business. Regardless
of their merits, these matters may require us to expend significant financial resources. Except as
described herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, we are
not aware of any other legal proceedings or claims that we believe may have, individually or taken
together, a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial position.
However, we are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of pending litigation and claims, and if our
assessment of our liability with respect to these actions and claims is incorrect, such actions and
claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial
position.
Stockholder Litigation
In the weeks following the announcement of the proposed Merger between us and Ventas on
February 28, 2011, purported stockholders filed seven lawsuits against us and our directors. The
purported stockholder plaintiffs commenced these actions in two jurisdictions: the Superior Court
of the State of California, Orange County (the California State Court); and the Circuit Court for
Baltimore City, Maryland (the Maryland State Court). All of these actions were brought as
putative class actions, and two also purport to assert derivative claims on behalf of the company.
All of these stockholder complaints allege that our directors breached certain alleged duties to
our stockholders by approving the Merger Agreement, and certain complaints allege that we aided and
abetted those breaches. All of the complaints request an injunction of the proposed Merger.
Certain of the complaints also seek damages.
In the California State Court, the following actions were filed purportedly on behalf of our
stockholders: on February 28, 2011, a putative class action entitled Palma v. Nationwide Health
Properties, Inc., et al.; on March 3, 2011, a putative class action entitled Barker v. Nationwide
Health Properties, Inc., et al.; and on March 3, 2011, a putative class action entitled Davis v.
Nationwide Health Properties, Inc., et al., which was subsequently amended on March 11, 2011 under
the caption Davids v. Nationwide Health Properties, Inc., et al. Each action names us and our
directors as defendants. Each complaint alleges, among other things, that our directors breached
certain alleged duties by approving the Merger Agreement because the proposed transaction
purportedly fails to maximize stockholder value and purportedly provides the directors personal
benefits not shared by our stockholders. The Palma and Davids actions allege that we aided and
abetted those purported breaches. Along with other relief, the complaints seek an injunction
against the closing of the proposed Merger. On March 22, 2011, the parties to the Palma, Barker,
and Davids actions signed a Stipulation and Proposed Order on Consolidation of Related Actions
providing for consolidation of all three actions. On April 4, 2011, the defendants in all three
actions demurred and moved to stay the proceedings in favor of parallel litigation pending in the
Maryland State Court.
27
NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2011
In the Maryland State Court, the following actions were filed purportedly on behalf of our
stockholders: on March 7, 2011, a putative class action entitled Crowley v. Nationwide Health
Properties, Inc., et al.; on March 10, 2011, a putative class action entitled Taylor v. Nationwide
Health Properties, Inc., et. al.; on March 17, 2011, a putative class action entitled Haughey
Family Trust v. Pasquale, et al.; and on March 31, 2011, a putative class action entitled Rappaport
v. Pasquale, et al. All four actions name us and our directors as defendants. All four actions
allege, among other things, that our directors breached certain alleged duties by approving the
Merger Agreement because the proposed transaction purportedly fails to maximize stockholder value
and purportedly provides certain directors personal benefits not shared by our stockholders. The
Haughey, Rappaport and Crowley actions allege that we aided and abetted those purported breaches.
In addition to asserting direct claims on behalf of a putative class of our stockholders, the
Haughey and Rappaport actions purport to bring derivative claims on behalf of the company,
asserting breaches of certain alleged duties by our directors in connection with their approval of
the proposed Merger. All four actions seek to enjoin the proposed Merger, and the Taylor action
seeks damages.
On March 30, 2011, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the Maryland State Court entered an
order consolidating the Crowley, Taylor and Haughey actions. On April 1, 2011, pursuant to
stipulation of the parties, the Maryland State Court entered an order: (i) certifying a class of
our stockholders; and (ii) providing for the plaintiffs to file a consolidated amended complaint.
On April 13, 2011, the Maryland State Court held a status conference and thereafter entered certain
scheduling orders. On April 22, 2011, the plaintiffs in Maryland filed a consolidated amended class
action complaint.
Development Agreements
As of March 31, 2011, we had entered into a joint venture to develop a medical office building
(see Note 5) and entered into other agreements to develop two assisted and independent living
facilities (see Note 3) and to fund the expansion of a skilled nursing facility securing a mortgage
loan (see Note 4). As of March 31, 2011, we had committed to fund an additional $52.5 million under
these agreements, of which $34.5 million will be funded through a third party construction loan
obtained during the three months ended March 31, 2011 (see Note 10).
Lines of Credit
Under the terms of an agreement with PMB LLC, we agreed to extend to PMB LLC a $10.0 million
line of credit to fund certain costs of PMB LLC with respect to the proposed development of
multi-tenant medical office buildings. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we funded $1.3
million and received payments of $2.6 million under the line of credit. As of March 31, 2011, $3.6
million was outstanding and is included in the caption Other assets on our consolidated balance
sheet.
During 2010, we agreed to loan two of our consolidated joint ventures up to $65.3 million as
project financing, including $56.6 million that was disbursed initially and remained outstanding at
March 31, 2011.
Indemnities
We have entered into indemnification agreements with those partners who contributed
appreciated property into NHP/PMB. Generally, under these indemnification agreements, if any of the
appreciated real estate contributed by the partners is sold by NHP/PMB in a taxable transaction
within a specified number of years after the property was contributed, we will reimburse the
affected partners for the federal and state income taxes associated with the pre-contribution gain
that is specially allocated to the affected partner under the Code. We have no current plans to
sell any of these properties.
19. Subsequent Events
From
April 1, 2011 to May 5, 2011, we completed approximately $484 million of investments in 46
facilities.
28
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Disclosure
Certain information contained in this report includes statements that may be deemed to be
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our expectations, beliefs,
intentions, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance and underlying
assumptions and other statements which are not statements of historical facts. These statements may
be identified, without limitation, by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will,
anticipates, expects, believes, intends, should or comparable terms or the negative
thereof. All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available
to us on the date hereof. These statements speak only as of the date hereof and we assume no
obligation to update such forward-looking statements. These statements involve risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the
statements. Risks and uncertainties associated with our business include (without limitation) the
following:
|
|
|
risks related to the proposed Merger with Ventas, Inc.; |
|
|
|
deterioration in the operating results or financial condition, including bankruptcies, of
our tenants or other significant operators in the healthcare industry; |
|
|
|
non-payment or late payment of rent, interest or loan principal amounts by our tenants; |
|
|
|
the ability of our tenants to pay contractual rent and/or interest escalations in future
periods; |
|
|
|
the ability of our tenants to obtain and maintain adequate liability and other insurance
and potential underinsured or uninsured losses; |
|
|
|
occupancy levels at certain facilities; |
|
|
|
our reliance on one tenant for a significant percentage of our revenues; |
|
|
|
risks associated with real estate ownership, including the illiquid nature of real estate
and the real estate market, maintenance and repair costs, potential liability under
environmental laws, leases that are not renewed or are renewed at lower rates, our ability
to attract new tenants for certain facilities, purchase option exercises that reduce revenue
and our ability to sell certain facilities for their book value; |
|
|
|
the amount and yield of any additional investments and risks associated with
acquisitions, including our ability to identify and complete favorable transactions, delays
or failures in obtaining third party consents or approvals, the failure to achieve perceived
benefits, unexpected costs or liabilities and potential litigation; |
|
|
|
risks associated with development, including our ability to obtain financing, delays or
failures in obtaining necessary permits and authorizations, the failure to achieve original
project estimates and our limited history in conducting ground-up development projects; |
|
|
|
access to the capital markets and the cost and availability of capital; |
|
|
|
changes in the ratings of our debt securities; |
|
|
|
our level of indebtedness; |
|
|
|
the effect of economic and market conditions and changes in interest rates; |
|
|
|
maintaining compliance with our debt covenants and restrictions imposed by such
covenants; |
|
|
|
the possibility that we could be required to repurchase some of our senior notes; |
29
|
|
|
increased competition in our business sector; |
|
|
|
adverse trends in the healthcare industry; |
|
|
|
tenant regulatory and licensing requirements and the effect of healthcare reform
legislation or government regulations, including changes in the reimbursement levels under
the Medicare and Medicaid programs; |
|
|
|
our ability to retain key personnel; |
|
|
|
changes in or inadvertent violations of tax laws and regulations and other factors that
can affect our status as a real estate investment trust (REIT); and |
|
|
|
the risk factors set forth under the caption Risk Factors in Item 1A and other factors
discussed from time to time in our news releases, public statements and/or filings with the
SEC, especially the risk factors set forth in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and
any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. |
Proposed Merger with Ventas
On February 27, 2011, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement)
with Ventas, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Ventas), and Needles Acquisition LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Ventas (Merger Sub).
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, NHP will be merged with and into Merger Sub (the
Merger), with Merger Sub surviving the Merger as a subsidiary of Ventas. Pursuant to the Merger
Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (the Effective Time), each outstanding share of
common stock, other than shares held by any wholly owned subsidiary of NHP, by Ventas or by any
subsidiary of Ventas, will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive 0.7866 shares (the
Exchange Ratio) of common stock of Ventas (Ventas Common Stock).
Upon completion of the Merger, (i) each outstanding stock option will become fully vested and,
in Ventass discretion, either be (A) cashed out based on the option spread or (B) assumed by
Ventas, on the same terms and conditions (subject to adjustment for the exchange ratio), provided
that stock options granted to certain senior executives in February 2011 will be assumed by Ventas
on the same terms and conditions (subject to adjustment for the Exchange Ratio); (ii) each
restricted stock unit will vest in full and be cashed out based on the Exchange Ratio, provided
that (a) restricted stock units granted to certain senior executives in February 2011 will be
assumed by Ventas on the same terms and conditions (subject to adjustment for the Exchange Ratio)
and (b) certain restricted stock units granted to certain senior executives will vest and be
settled in accordance with their terms; (iii) each share of restricted stock will vest in full and
be converted into Ventas Common Stock, based on the Exchange Ratio; (iv) performance shares will
vest under the relevant agreements and will be converted into Ventas Common Stock based on the
Exchange Ratio; and (v) dividend equivalent rights granted in connection with any award will become
fully vested and be paid out.
We have made customary representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement and have agreed
to customary covenants, including covenants regarding the operation of our business prior to the
closing and covenants prohibiting us from soliciting, providing information or entering into
discussions concerning proposals relating to alternative business combination transactions, except
in limited circumstances relating to unsolicited proposals that constitute, or are reasonably
expected to lead to, a superior proposal.
Consummation of the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including approval of
our stockholders and Ventass stockholders. The Merger Agreement may be terminated under certain
circumstances, including by either party if the Merger has not occurred by October 31, 2011, if an
order is entered prohibiting or disapproving the transaction and the order has become final and
non-appealable, if our stockholders or Ventass stockholders fail to approve the transaction, or
upon a material uncured breach by the other party that would cause the closing conditions not to be
satisfied.
30
Additional Information About the Proposed Transaction and Where to Find it:
This communication does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy
any securities or a solicitation of any vote or approval. In connection with the proposed
transaction, Ventas has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) a registration
statement on Form S-4 that includes a preliminary joint proxy statement of NHP and Ventas, and that
also constitutes a preliminary prospectus of Ventas. NHP and Ventas also plan to file other
documents with the SEC with respect to the proposed transaction. The registration statement has not
been declared effective by the SEC, and the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus is not
currently available. INVESTORS ARE URGED TO READ THE PRELIMINARY JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/ PROSPECTUS
AND, IF AND WHEN IT BECOMES AVAILABLE, THE DEFINITIVE JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS (INCLUDING
ALL AMENDMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTS TO SUCH DOCUMENTS) AND OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE SEC
IF AND WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE
PROPOSED TRANSACTION.
Investors may obtain free copies of the registration statement, the preliminary joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents
filed by NHP and Ventas with the SEC (if and when they become available) through the website
maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. Copies of the documents filed by NHP with the SEC are
available free of charge on NHPs website at www.nhp-reit.com, and copies of the documents
filed by Ventas with the SEC are also available free of charge on Ventass website at
www.ventasreit.com.
NHP, Ventas and their respective directors and executive officers may be deemed to be
participants in the solicitation of proxies from NHPs and Ventass stockholders in respect of the
proposed transaction. Information regarding NHPs directors and executive officers can be found in
NHPs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as amended by
Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on April 26, 2011. Information regarding Ventass
directors and executive officers can be found in Ventass definitive proxy statement filed with the
SEC on March 28, 2011. Additional information regarding the interests of such potential
participants is included in the preliminary joint proxy statement/prospectus and will be included
in the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents filed with the SEC
in connection with the proposed transaction if and when they become available. These documents are
available free of charge on the SECs website and from NHP or Ventas, as applicable, using the
sources indicated above.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of
the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions or other matters had been different,
it is possible that different accounting would have been applied, resulting in different
presentation of our financial statements. For a description of the risks associated with our
critical accounting policies and estimates, see Risk Factors Risks Relating to Us and Our
Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. On an
ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those that impact our most
critical accounting policies. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on
various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may
differ from these estimates. We believe the following are our most critical accounting estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NHP, its wholly owned
subsidiaries and its joint ventures that are controlled through voting rights or other means. We
apply the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 810, Consolidation (ASC 810), for arrangements with variable interest
entities (VIEs) and would consolidate those VIEs where we are the primary beneficiary. All
material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
31
Our judgment with respect to our level of influence or control of an entity and whether we are
the primary beneficiary of a VIE involves the consideration of various factors including, but not
limited to, the form of our ownership interest, our representation on the entitys governing body,
the size of our investment, estimates of future cash flows, our ability to participate in
policy-making decisions and the rights of the other investors to participate in the decision-making
process and to replace us as manager and/or liquidate the venture, if applicable. Our ability to
correctly assess our influence or control over an entity or determine the primary beneficiary of a
VIE affects the presentation of these entities in our consolidated financial statements.
We apply the provisions of ASC Topic 323, Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures, to
investments in joint ventures. Investments in entities that we do not consolidate but for which we
have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are
reported under the equity method. Under the equity method of accounting, our share of the entitys
earnings or losses is included in our operating results.
Revenue Recognition
We derive the majority of our revenue from leases related to our real estate investments and a
much smaller portion of our revenue from mortgage loans, other financing activities and other
miscellaneous income. Revenue is recognized when it is realized or is realizable and earned.
Rental income from operating leases is recognized in accordance with the provisions of ASC
Topic 840, Leases, and ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. Our leases generally contain annual rent
escalators. Many of our leases contain non-contingent rent escalators for which we recognize income
on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Recognizing income on a straight-line basis requires
us to calculate the total non-contingent rent to be paid over the life of a lease and to recognize
the revenue evenly over that life. This method results in rental income in the early years of a
lease being higher than actual cash received, creating a straight-line rent receivable asset
included in the caption Other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. At some point during the
lease, depending on its terms, the cash rent payments eventually exceed the straight-line rent
which results in the straight-line rent receivable asset decreasing to zero over the remainder of
the lease term. Certain leases contain rent escalators contingent on revenues or other factors,
including increases based on changes in the Consumer Price Index. Such revenue increases are
recognized as the related contingencies are met.
We assess the collectability of straight-line rent in accordance with the applicable
accounting standards and our reserve policy and defer recognition of straight-line rent if its
collectability is not reasonably assured. Our assessment of the collectability of straight-line
rent is based on several factors, including the financial strength of the tenant and any
guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the facility, the historical payment
pattern of the tenant and the type of facility, among others. If our evaluation of these factors
indicates we may not receive the rent payments due in the future, we defer recognition of the
straight-line rental income and, depending on the circumstances, we will provide a reserve against
the previously recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for a portion, up to its full value,
that we estimate may not be recoverable. If we change our assumptions or estimates regarding the
collectability of future rent payments required by a lease, we may adjust our reserve to increase
or reduce the rental revenue recognized, and/or to increase or reduce the reserve against the
existing straight-line rent receivable balance.
We evaluate the collectability of the straight-line rent receivable balances on an ongoing
basis and provide reserves against receivables we believe may not be fully recoverable. The
ultimate amount of straight-line rent we realize could vary from the amounts currently recorded.
Interest income from loans, including discounts and premiums, is recognized using the
effective interest method when collectability is reasonably assured. The effective interest method
is applied on a loan-by-loan basis, and discounts and premiums are recognized as yield adjustments
over the term of the related loans. We recognize interest income on impaired loans to the extent
our estimate of the fair value of the collateral is sufficient to support the balance of the loans,
other receivables and all related accrued interest. Once the total of the loans, other receivables
and all related accrued interest is equal to our estimate of the fair value of the collateral, we
recognize interest income on a cash basis. We provide reserves against impaired loans to the extent
our total investment exceeds our estimate of the fair value of the loan collateral.
32
Investments in Real Estate
We record properties at cost and use the straight-line method of depreciation for buildings
and improvements over their estimated remaining useful lives of up to 40 years, generally 20 to 40
years depending on factors including building type, age, quality and location. We review and adjust
useful lives periodically.
We allocate purchase prices of properties in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 805,
Business Combinations (ASC 805), which require that the acquisition method of accounting be used
for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination.
ASC 805 also establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree.
The allocation of the cost between land, building and, if applicable, equipment and intangible
assets and liabilities, and the determination of the useful life of a property are based on
managements estimates, which are based in part on independent appraisals or other consultants
reports. For our triple-net leased facilities, the allocation is made as if the property was
vacant, and a significant portion of the cost of each property is allocated to buildings. This
amount generally approximates 90% of the total property value. Historically, we have generally
acquired properties and simultaneously entered into a new market rate lease for the entire property
with one tenant. For our multi-tenant medical office buildings, the percentage allocated to
buildings may be substantially lower as allocations are made to assets such as lease-up intangible
assets, above market tenant and ground lease intangible assets and in-place lease intangible assets
(collectively, Intangible assets) included on our consolidated balance sheets and/or below market
tenant and ground lease intangible liabilities included in the caption Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.
We calculate depreciation and amortization on equipment and lease costs using the
straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of up to five years or the lease term,
whichever is appropriate. We amortize intangible assets and liabilities over the remaining lease
terms of the respective leases to real estate amortization expense or medical office building
operating rent, as appropriate. We review and adjust useful lives periodically. If we do not
allocate appropriately between land and building or we incorrectly estimate the useful lives of our
assets, our computation of depreciation and amortization will not appropriately reflect the usage
of the assets over future periods. If we overestimate the useful life of an asset, the depreciation
expense related to the asset will be understated, which could result in a loss if the asset is sold
in the future.
Asset Impairment
We review our long-lived assets individually on a quarterly basis to determine if there are
indicators of impairment in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant and
Equipment. Indicators may include, among others, a tenants inability to make rent payments,
operating losses or negative operating trends at the facility level, notification by a tenant that
it will not renew its lease, or a decision to dispose of an asset or adverse changes in the fair
value of any of our properties. For operating assets, if indicators of impairment exist, we compare
the undiscounted cash flows from the expected use of the property to its net book value to
determine if impairment exists. The evaluation of the undiscounted cash flows from the expected use
of the property is highly subjective and is based in part on various factors and assumptions,
including, but not limited to, historical operating results, available market information and known
trends and market/economic conditions that may affect the property, as well as estimates of future
operating income, occupancy, rental rates, leasing demand and competition. If the sum of the future
estimated undiscounted cash flows is higher than the current net book value, we conclude no
impairment exists. If the sum of the future estimated undiscounted cash flows is lower than its
current net book value, we recognize an impairment loss for the difference between the net book
value of the asset and its estimated fair value. To the extent we decide to sell an asset, we
recognize an impairment loss if the current net book value of the asset exceeds its fair value less
selling costs.
We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture
may exceed the fair value. If it is determined that a decline in the fair value of our investment
in an unconsolidated joint venture is other-than-temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below
its carrying value, an impairment is recorded. The determination of the fair value of investments
in unconsolidated joint ventures involves significant judgment. Our estimates consider all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value of the expected
future cash flows discounted at market rates, general economic conditions and trends and other
relevant factors.
33
The above analyses require us to determine whether there are indicators of impairment for
individual assets or investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, to estimate the most likely
stream of cash flows from operating assets and to determine the fair value of assets that are
impaired or held for sale. If our assumptions, projections or estimates regarding an asset change
in the future, we may have to record an impairment charge to reduce or further reduce the net book
value of such individual asset or investment in unconsolidated joint venture.
Collectability of Receivables
We evaluate the collectability of our rent, mortgage and other loans and other receivables on
a regular basis based on factors including, among others, payment history, the financial strength
of the borrower and any guarantors, the value of the underlying collateral, the operations and
operating trends of the underlying collateral, if any, the asset type and current economic
conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates we may not recover the full value of the
receivable, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be
recovered. This analysis requires us to determine whether there are factors indicating a receivable
may not be fully collectible and to estimate the amount of the receivable that may not be
collected. If our assumptions or estimates regarding the collectability of a receivable change in
the future, we may have to record a reserve to reduce or further reduce the carrying value of the
receivable.
For our mortgage loans, the evaluation emphasizes the operations, operating trends, financial
performance and value of the underlying collateral, and for our other loans, the evaluation
emphasizes the financial strength of the borrower and any guarantors. Based on this evaluation, our
mortgage and other loans are grouped into three classes good standing, watch list and special
monitoring. For loans classified as good standing, the likelihood of loss is remote, and while
borrowers may be current on all required payments for loans classified as watch list or special
monitoring, there are other factors considered in our evaluation which cause the likelihood of loss
to be reasonably possible.
Income Taxes
We intend to continue to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and accordingly, no provision has been made for federal income
taxes. However, we are subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and/or property, and
these amounts are included in the expense caption General and administrative on our consolidated
income statements.
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, significant
management judgment is required to estimate our compliance with REIT requirements. Our
determinations are based on interpretation of tax laws, and our conclusions may have an impact on
the income tax expense recognized. Adjustments to income tax expense may be required as a result of
i) audits conducted by federal and state tax authorities; ii) our ability to qualify as a REIT;
iii) the potential for built-in-gain recognized related to prior-tax-free acquisitions of C
corporations; and iv) changes in tax laws. Adjustments required in any given period are included in
income, other than adjustments to income tax liabilities acquired in business combinations, which
would be adjusted through goodwill.
Impact of New Accounting Standards Updates
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-06, Improving
Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06). ASU 2010-06 adds new requirements for
disclosures of significant transfers into and out of Levels 1, 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy,
the reasons for the transfers and the policy for determining when transfers are recognized. ASU
2010-06 also adds new requirements for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and
settlements on a gross rather than net basis relating to the reconciliation of the beginning and
ending balances of Level 3 recurring fair value measurements. It also clarifies the level of
disaggregation to require disclosures by class rather than by major category of assets and
liabilities and clarifies that a description of inputs and valuation techniques used to measure
fair value is required for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements classified as
Level 2 or 3. ASU 2010-06 became effective January 1, 2010 except for the requirements to provide the Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances and
settlements on a gross basis which are effective January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did
not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.
34
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures About the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (ASU 2010-20). ASU 2010-20 amends ASC Topic 310,
Receivables, to require additional disclosures regarding credit quality and the allowance for
credit losses related to financing receivables, including credit quality indicators and past due
and modification information. Disclosures must be disaggregated by segment and class. The
disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective December 31, 2010, and the
disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period became effective January 1, 2011.
The adoption of ASU 2010-20 did not have a material impact on our results of operations or
financial position.
Operating Results
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 vs. Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triple-net lease rent |
|
$ |
82,271 |
|
|
$ |
72,200 |
|
|
$ |
10,071 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Medical office building operating rent |
|
|
29,515 |
|
|
|
21,685 |
|
|
|
7,830 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,786 |
|
|
|
93,885 |
|
|
|
17,901 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
10,588 |
|
|
|
6,963 |
|
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,374 |
|
|
|
100,848 |
|
|
|
21,526 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
22,771 |
|
|
|
23,590 |
|
|
|
(819 |
) |
|
|
-3 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
38,674 |
|
|
|
31,290 |
|
|
|
7,384 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
7,365 |
|
|
|
6,980 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Merger and acquisition costs |
|
|
5,097 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
253 |
% |
Medical office building operating expenses |
|
|
10,358 |
|
|
|
8,647 |
|
|
|
1,711 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,265 |
|
|
|
71,950 |
|
|
|
12,315 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
38,109 |
|
|
|
28,898 |
|
|
|
9,211 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Gain on debt extinguishment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
-100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
39,574 |
|
|
|
30,320 |
|
|
|
9,254 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of facilities, net |
|
|
10,607 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
10,585 |
|
|
|
48114 |
% |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
(764 |
) |
|
|
-85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,740 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
9,821 |
|
|
|
1069 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
50,314 |
|
|
|
31,239 |
|
|
|
19,075 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to NHP common stockholders |
|
$ |
50,551 |
|
|
$ |
31,429 |
|
|
$ |
19,122 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triple-net lease rental income increased primarily due to rental income from 49 facilities
(including majority interests in 15 of the facilities) acquired during 2010 and seven facilities
acquired during 2011 and rent increases at existing facilities, offset in part by reserves.
35
Medical office building operating rent increased primarily due to operating rent from 22
multi-tenant medical office buildings (including majority interests in five of the multi-tenant
medical office buildings) acquired during 2010 and one multi-tenant medical office building
acquired during 2011.
Interest and other income increased primarily due to the funding of four new mortgage loans,
additional fundings on an existing mortgage loan and the acquisition of one mortgage loan during
2010 and recognition of a deferred gain on sale under the installment method in 2011 for facilities
previously sold to the tenants for which we provided a mortgage loan, offset in part by the
recognition of a net gain upon acquisition of the controlling interest in an unconsolidated joint
venture during 2010 and the retirement of our $47.5 million loan from a related party as a result
of the acquisition of the multi-tenant medical office building serving as collateral during 2010.
Interest expense decreased primarily due to the repayment of $185.5 million of secured debt
during 2010, offset in part by the assumption of $125.3 million of secured debt during 2010 and
borrowings under our revolving unsecured senior credit facility.
Depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to the acquisition of 71 facilities
during 2010, including 22 multi-tenant medical office buildings, and the acquisition of eight
facilities during 2011, including one multi-tenant medical office building.
General and administrative expenses increased primarily due to increased expenses for third
party advisors, state tax expense and other general corporate expenses, offset in part by decreased
employee related costs.
Merger and acquisition costs increased primarily due to our proposed Merger with Ventas.
Medical office building operating expenses increased primarily due to operating expenses from
22 multi-tenant medical office buildings (including majority interests in five of the multi-tenant
medical office buildings) acquired during 2010 and one multi-tenant medical office building
acquired during 2011.
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures increased primarily due to increased income from our
unconsolidated joint venture with a state pension fund investor, offset in part by losses from PMB
Real Estate Services LLC (PMBRES) in 2011 as compared to income in 2010.
Discontinued operations income of $10.7 million for 2011 was primarily comprised of gains on
sale of $10.6 million and rental income of $0.2 million. Discontinued operations income of $0.9
million for 2010 was primarily comprised of rental income of $1.6 million, offset in part by
depreciation and amortization expense of $0.7 million. We expect to have future sales of facilities
or reclassifications of facilities to assets held for sale, and the related income or loss would be
included in discontinued operations unless the facilities were transferred to an entity in which we
maintain an interest.
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests increased primarily due to losses from
certain multi-tenant medical office building consolidated joint ventures entered into during 2010.
36
Funds From Operations and Funds Available for Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands except per |
|
|
|
share amounts) |
|
Funds From Operations (FFO): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50,314 |
|
|
$ |
31,239 |
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
38,248 |
|
|
|
31,545 |
|
Depreciation in income from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
Deferred gain recognition |
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of facilities, net |
|
|
(10,607 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted FFO |
|
|
78,903 |
|
|
|
64,191 |
|
Merger and acquisition costs |
|
|
5,097 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(620 |
) |
Gain on debt extinguishment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted diluted FFO |
|
$ |
84,000 |
|
|
$ |
64,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds Available for Distribution (FAD): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50,314 |
|
|
$ |
31,239 |
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
38,248 |
|
|
|
31,545 |
|
Deferred gain recognition |
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of facilities, net |
|
|
(10,607 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Straight-lined rent |
|
|
(2,300 |
) |
|
|
(1,687 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets and liabilties |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
Deferred financing cost amortization |
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
Lease commissions and tenant and capital improvements |
|
|
(1,981 |
) |
|
|
(637 |
) |
NHPs share of FAD reconciling items from unconsolidated joint ventures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
Straight-lined rent |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Deferred financing cost amortization |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted FAD |
|
|
77,199 |
|
|
|
64,267 |
|
Merger and acquisition costs |
|
|
5,097 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(620 |
) |
Gain on debt extinguishment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted diluted FAD |
|
$ |
82,296 |
|
|
$ |
65,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding for FFO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (1) |
|
|
129,129 |
|
|
|
119,600 |
|
Series B preferred stock add-back if not converted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
129,129 |
|
|
|
119,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted per share amounts FFO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted FFO |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding includes the effect of all
participating and non-participating share-based payment awards which
for us consists of stock options and other share-based payment awards
if the effect is dilutive. The dilutive effect of all share-based
payment awards is calculated using the treasury stock method.
Additionally, our redeemable OP units are included as if converted to
common stock on a one-for-one basis. |
37
While net income and its related per share amounts, as defined by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), are the most appropriate earnings measures, we
believe that FFO and FAD and the related FFO per share amounts are important non-GAAP supplemental
measures of operating performance. GAAP requires the use of straight-line depreciation of
historical costs and implies that real estate values diminish predictably and ratably over time.
However, real estate values have historically risen and fallen based on various market conditions
and other factors. FFO was developed as a supplemental measure of operating performance primarily
in order to exclude historical cost-based depreciation and amortization and its effects as it does
not generally reflect the actual change in value of real estate over time. We calculate FFO in
accordance with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) definition.
FFO is defined as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains and losses from the
sale of real estate plus real estate related depreciation and amortization. The same adjustments
are made to reflect our share of these same items from unconsolidated joint ventures. Adjusted FFO
is defined as FFO excluding impairments of assets, merger and acquisition costs and gains and
losses other than those from the sale of real estate.
FAD was developed as a supplemental measure of operating performance primarily to exclude
non-cash revenues and expenses that are included in FFO. FAD is defined as net income (computed in
accordance with GAAP) excluding gains and losses from the sale of real estate plus real estate
related depreciation and amortization, plus or minus straight-lined rent (plus cash in excess of
rent or minus rent in excess of cash), plus or minus amortization of above or below market lease
intangibles, plus non-cash stock based compensation, plus deferred financing cost amortization plus
any impairments minus lease commissions, tenant improvements and capital improvements paid. The
same adjustments are made to reflect our share of these same items from unconsolidated joint
ventures. Adjusted FAD is defined as FAD excluding merger and acquisition costs and gains and
losses other than those from the sale of real estate.
We believe that the use of FFO, adjusted FFO and the related per share amounts, and FAD and
adjusted FAD in conjunction with the required GAAP disclosures provides investors with a more
comprehensive understanding of the operating results of a REIT and enables investors to compare the
operating results between REITs without having to account for differences caused by different
depreciation assumptions and different non-cash revenues and expenses. Additionally, FFO and FAD
are used by us and widely used by industry analysts as a measure of operating performance for
equity REITs.
Our calculations of FFO, adjusted FFO and the related per share amounts, and FAD and adjusted
FAD presented herein may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other REITs that do not
define FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition, interpret that definition differently than we
do or that do not use the same definitions as we do for such terms. These supplemental reporting
measures should not be considered as alternatives to net income (a GAAP measure) as primary
indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities
(a GAAP measure) as primary measures of our liquidity, nor are these measures necessarily
indicative of sufficient cash flow to satisfy all of our liquidity requirements. We believe that
these supplemental reporting measures should be examined in conjunction with net income as
presented in our consolidated financial statements and data included elsewhere in this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated operating
results.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased
$11.8 million, or 27%, as compared to the same period in 2010. This was primarily due to increased
operating income from our owned facilities as a result of acquisitions and other investments during
2010 and 2011. There have been no significant changes in the underlying sources and uses of cash
provided by operating activities.
38
Investing Activities
Our investing activities primarily consist of investments in and sales of real estate and
related assets and liabilities, investments in and principal payments on mortgage and other loans
receivable and contributions to and distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures.
Investments in and Sales of Real Estate and Related Assets and Liabilities
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we acquired six skilled nursing facilities and
one assisted and independent living facility subject to triple-net leases and one multi-tenant
medical office building in three separate transactions for an aggregate investment of $121.4
million, including a $12.0 million contingent purchase price obligation which is included in the
caption Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of March
31, 2011.
As of March 31, 2011, we had committed to fund an additional $44.8 million under existing
development agreements, of which $34.5 million will be funded through a third party construction
loan obtained during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we funded $3.3 million in expansions,
construction and capital improvements at certain facilities in our triple-net leases segment in
accordance with existing lease provisions. Such expansions, construction and capital improvements
generally result in an increase in the minimum rents earned by us on these facilities either at the
time of funding or upon completion of the project. As of March 31, 2011, we had committed to fund
additional expansions, construction and capital improvements of $10.9 million. During the three
months ended March 31, 2011, we also funded, directly and through our consolidated joint ventures,
$0.9 million in capital and tenant improvements at certain multi-tenant medical office buildings.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we sold two skilled nursing facilities for net
cash proceeds of $8.2 million that resulted in a total gain of $5.9 million which is included in
the caption Gain on sale of facilities, net in Discontinued operations on our consolidated
income statements.
Investments in and Principal Payments on Mortgage and Other Loans Receivable
In connection with the funding of a mortgage loan secured by a skilled nursing facility during
2010, we agreed to fund up to $10.9 million to expand the facility. During the three months ended
March 31, 2011, we funded $1.3 million under the agreement.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we also funded $1.4 million on other existing
loans. As of March 31, 2011, we had committed to fund additional amounts under existing loan
agreements of $18.4 million.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, one mortgage loan to Brookdale Senior Living,
Inc. secured by five assisted and independent living facilities with a carrying value of $28.3
million (net of a deferred gain of $4.7 million) was prepaid. The deferred gain was recognized and
included in the caption Gain on sale of facilities, net in Discontinued operations on our
consolidated income statements. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we received payments
of $3.1 million on other mortgage and other loans.
Contributions to and Distributions from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we received distributions of $1.0 million from
our unconsolidated joint venture with a state pension fund investor.
39
Financing Activities
Our financing activities primarily consist of issuance of and principal payments on debt
instruments, issuance of and redemption of equity instruments and distributions.
Issuance of and Principal Payments on Debt Instruments
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we borrowed $115.0 million and made payments of
$45.0 million under our revolving unsecured senior credit facility.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, our consolidated joint venture which owns a
development project obtained a $36.5 million construction loan under which $4.2 million has been
drawn and remains outstanding at March 31, 2011.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we made payments of $1.6 million on notes and
bonds payable.
Issuance and Redemption of Equity Instruments
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we issued approximately 153,000 shares of common
stock through our dividend reinvestment plan at an average price of $39.89 per share, resulting in
proceeds of approximately $6.1 million.
Distributions
We paid $61.1 million, or $0.48 per common share, in dividends to our common stockholders
during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, cash distributions of $0.2 million and $1.0
million were made to noncontrolling interests and OP unitholders, respectively.
Sources and Uses of Capital
The Merger Agreement with Ventas restricts us, without Ventass consent, from making certain
acquisitions and dispositions, from engaging in certain capital raising transactions and taking
other specified actions while the Merger is pending. This places certain constraints on our sources
and uses of capital described below during the pendency of the Merger which could adversely affect
our business and operations.
Sources of Capital
Financing for operating expenses, the repayment of our obligations and commitments, dividend
distributions and future investments may be provided by cash on hand, cash from operations,
borrowings under our existing credit facility or additional loan facilities, the sale of debt or
equity securities in private placements or public offerings, which may be made through our
at-the-market equity offering program or otherwise under our current shelf registration statement
or under new registration statements, proceeds from asset sales or mortgage and other loan
receivable repayments, the assumption of secured indebtedness, mortgage financing on a portion of
our owned portfolio or through joint ventures.
Our plans for growth require regular access to the capital and credit markets. If capital is
not available at an acceptable cost, it will significantly impair our ability to make future
investments and make acquisitions and development projects difficult or impractical to pursue.
We invest in various short-term investments that are intended to preserve principal value and
maintain a high degree of liquidity while providing current income. These investments may include
(either directly or indirectly) obligations of the U.S. government or its agencies, obligations
(including certificates of deposit) of banks, commercial paper, money market funds and other highly
rated short-term securities. We monitor our investments on a daily basis and do not believe our
cash and cash equivalents are exposed to any material risk of loss. However, given the recent
market volatility, there can be no assurances that future losses of principal will not occur.
Our leases and mortgages generally contain provisions under which rents or interest income
increase with increases in facility revenues and/or increases in the Consumer Price Index. If
facility revenues and/or the Consumer Price Index do not increase, our revenues may not increase. Rent levels under renewed leases
will also impact revenues. Excluding multi-tenant medical office buildings, as of March 31, 2011,
we had leases on 17 facilities expiring during the remainder of 2011.
40
We evaluate the collectability of our rent, mortgage and other loans and other receivables on
a regular basis and record reserves when collectability is not reasonably assured. As of March 31,
2011, we had reserves included in the caption Receivables, net on our consolidated balance sheets
of $13.7 million. Of the related $23.1 million gross receivable balance, 62% is due from two
tenants. One of the tenants, Hearthstone Senior Services, L.P. (Hearthstone), has a gross
receivable balance of $8.8 million, of which $6.5 million is reserved as a result of non-payment
when contractually due, and the related lease terms have been subsequently amended to cause $6.0
million to become payable under certain circumstances as described below. We are currently in
litigation with the other tenant which has a gross receivable balance of $5.6 million, of which
$4.6 million is reserved. We will continue to evaluate the collectability of our receivables, and
if our assumptions or estimates regarding the collectability of a receivable change in the future,
it may result in an adjustment to the existing reserve balance.
As of March 31, 2011, we had $455.0 million available under our $700.0 million revolving
unsecured senior credit facility. At our option, borrowings under the credit facility bear interest
at the prime rate (3.25% at March 31, 2011) or applicable LIBOR plus 0.70% (0.95% at March 31,
2011). We pay a facility fee of 0.15% per annum on the total commitment under the agreement. The
credit facility matures on December 15, 2011.
During August 2010, we entered into six 12-month forward-starting interest rate swap
agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $250.0 million at a weighted average rate of 3.16%.
We entered into these swap agreements in order to hedge the expected interest payments associated
with fixed rate debt forecasted to be issued in 2011. The swap agreements each have an effective
date of August 1, 2011 and a termination date of August 1, 2021. We expect to settle the swap
agreements when the forecasted debt is issued. We assessed the effectiveness of these swap
agreements as hedges at inception and on March 31, 2011 and consider these swap agreements to be
highly effective cash flow hedges. The swap agreements are recorded under the caption Other
assets on our consolidated balance sheets at their aggregate estimated fair value of $12.2 million
at March 31, 2011.
As of March 31, 2011, we had a shelf registration statement on file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission under which we may issue securities including debt, convertible debt, common
and preferred stock and warrants to purchase any of these securities. Our senior notes have been
investment grade rated since 1994. Our credit ratings at March 31, 2011 were BBB from Fitch
Ratings, Baa2 from Moodys Investors Service and BBB from Standard & Poors Ratings Services.
We have entered into sales agreements from time to time with agents to sell shares of our
common stock through an at-the-market equity offering program. As of March 31, 2011, approximately
1,322,000 shares of common stock were available to be sold pursuant to our at-the-market equity
offering program. However, under terms of the Merger Agreement, we are not permitted to issue any
shares of common stock, including any shares sold through our at-the-market equity offering
program, during the pendency of the Merger.
Prior to March 31, 2011, we sponsored a dividend reinvestment plan that enabled existing
stockholders to purchase additional shares of common stock by automatically reinvesting all or part
of the cash dividends paid on their shares of common stock at a discount ranging from 0% to 5%,
determined by us from time to time in accordance with the plan. Effective as of March 31, 2011, the
dividend reinvestment plan was suspended in accordance with its terms.
We anticipate the possible sale of certain facilities, primarily due to purchase option
exercises. In addition, mortgage and other loans receivable might be
prepaid. We intend to obtain a one-year $800 million term loan
facility from a syndicate of banks, which we anticipate using,
together with the proceeds from any asset sales or mortgage and other loan receivable repayments, to provide
capital for future investments, to reduce any outstanding balance on our credit facility or to
repay other borrowings as they mature. Any such future investments would increase revenues, and any
such reduction in debt levels would result in reduced interest expense that we believe would
partially offset any decrease in revenues from asset sales or mortgage or other loan receivable
repayments. We believe our tenants may exercise purchase options on assets with option prices
totaling approximately $26.9 million during the remainder of 2011.
41
Uses of Capital
From
April 1, 2011 to May 5, 2011, we completed approximately $484 million of investments. We
may make additional acquisitions during 2011, although we cannot predict the quantity or timing of
any such acquisitions. If we make additional investments in facilities, interest expense would
likely increase. We expect any such increases to be at least partially offset by associated rental
or interest income.
Assuming certain conditions are met under our Contribution Agreement with Pacific Medical
Buildings LLC and certain of its affiliates, we would expect to finance the acquisition of the
remaining building subject to the Contribution Agreement with a combination of assumed debt, the
issuance of OP Units, cash on hand, cash from operations and
borrowings under our credit facility or the term loan facility we
intend to obtain.
As of March 31, 2011, we had $584.0 million of debt maturing during the remainder of 2011.
Additionally, $75.4 million of our senior notes can be put to us prior to the stated maturity date;
however, there are no such senior notes that we may be required to repay in 2011. We anticipate
repaying senior notes and notes and bonds payable at or prior to maturity with a combination of
proceeds from borrowings under our existing credit facility or the
term loan facility we intend to obtain and cash
on hand and cash from operations. Borrowings under our credit facility could be repaid with cash on
hand, cash from operations, the issuance of debt or equity securities under our shelf registration
statement, borrowings under the term loan facility we intend to obtain
or proceeds from asset sales or mortgage or
other loan receivable repayments.
We expect that our current common stock dividend policy will continue, but it is subject to
regular review by our board of directors. Common stock dividends are paid at the discretion of our
board of directors and are dependent upon various factors, including our future earnings, our
financial condition and liquidity, our capital requirements and applicable legal and contractual
restrictions. On May 3, 2011, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.48
per share of common stock. This dividend will be paid on June 3, 2011 to stockholders of record on
May 20, 2011. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we have agreed to declare a prorated dividend for
the period between the record date of our then most recent dividend and the closing of the Merger,
at the same rate as the dividend for the prior period.
Outlook
Recent market and economic conditions have been unprecedented and challenging with tighter
credit conditions and slow growth. While there are current signs of a strengthening and stabilizing
economy and more liquid and attractive capital markets, there is continued uncertainty over whether
our economy will again be adversely impacted by inflation, deflation or stagflation, and the
systemic impact of high unemployment, energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost
of capital, the U.S. mortgage market and a declining real estate market in the U.S., resulting in a
return to illiquid credit markets and widening credit spreads. We had $455.0 million available
under our credit facility at March 31, 2011, and we currently have no reason to believe that we
will be unable to access the facility in the future or renew the facility upon its expiration in
2011. Additionally, we intend to obtain a one-year $800 million term
loan facility from a syndicate of banks. However, continued concern about the stability of the markets generally and the strength of
borrowers specifically has led many lenders and institutional investors to reduce and, in some
cases, cease to provide, funding to borrowers. If we were unable to
access our credit facility or obtain a new term loan facility, it
could result in an adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition. In addition, continued
turbulence in market conditions may adversely affect the liquidity and financial condition of our
tenants.
If the adverse market conditions the U.S. recently experienced return, they may limit our
ability, and the ability of our tenants, to timely refinance maturing liabilities and access the
capital markets to meet liquidity needs, resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations. Additionally, certain of our debt obligations are
floating-rate obligations with interest rate and related payments that vary with the movement of
LIBOR or other indexes. If the recent market turbulence continues, there could be a rise in
interest rates which could reduce our profitability or adversely affect our ability to meet our
obligations.
We believe the combination of cash on hand, cash from operations, the ability to draw on our
$700.0 million credit facility, the new term loan facility we
intend to obtain and the ability to sell securities under our shelf registration
statement, as well as our unconsolidated joint venture with a state pension fund investor, provide
sufficient liquidity and financing capability to finance anticipated future investments, maintain
our current dividend level and repay borrowings at or prior to their maturity, for at least the
next 12 months.
42
In February 2011, our tenant, Hearthstone, notified us that it would be unable to pay the rent
then due under its leases with us, and asked us to amend certain terms of the leases to make rents
achievable. In order to substantially increase the ability of Hearthstone to meet its future
obligations, and thereby protecting our interest, we agreed to certain modifications of the terms of our leases with Hearthstone that
include, among other things, a reduction in the aggregate rent payable by $7.4 million for the
lease year ending February 2012, and by $6.4 million for subsequent lease years through 2021. After
giving effect to these reductions, the aggregate rent payable by Hearthstone is $31.7 million for
the first lease year, $33.7 million for the second lease year and increases by 3% each year
thereafter. In connection with the lease modifications, we also obtained the right to terminate any
and all of our leases with Hearthstone at any time without cause. We believe that the agreed upon
rent reductions will be sufficient to enable Hearthstone to satisfy its future payment obligations
to us, but there can be no assurance in this regard. We hold a $6.0 million letter of credit that
secures Hearthstones payment obligations to us. However, it is possible that the letter of credit
may not be sufficient to compensate us for any future losses or expenses that may arise if
Hearthstone defaults under its leases with us. Other terms of our modified arrangements with
Hearthstone include:
|
|
|
We have eliminated supplemental rent obligations, except for supplemental rent accrued
prior to February 1, 2011, which totals $6.0 million and becomes payable (i) in full upon an
event of default by Hearthstone for which NHP chooses to exercise its remedies, (ii) in full
upon a sale of Hearthstone and (iii) in part, if we exercise our right to terminate the
leases with Hearthstone without cause. |
|
|
|
We will be entitled to receive revenue participation rent, payable monthly and calculated
as 20% of incremental gross revenue over the base month of February 2011, commencing
February 1, 2012 and capped in any one year at $6.4 million (subject to annual increases of
3%). |
|
|
|
Upon exercise of our right to terminate the leases without cause, Hearthstone must enter
into an operations transfer agreement with a successor operator to allow for an efficient
transfer of operations to our designee. |
|
|
|
If we exercise the right to terminate the Hearthstone leases without cause, upon
transition of the facilities to a licensed replacement operator we must release to
Hearthstone a portion of the $6.0 million letter of credit. The amount released is $3.0
million if the transition occurs prior to September 1, 2011, and increases by $1 million for
every six month period thereafter. |
|
|
|
The Chief Executive Officer of Hearthstone has executed a guaranty in our favor that
would obligate him to reimburse us the amount of any (i) distributions in excess of
permitted amounts, (ii) compensation paid to him in excess of permitted amounts, and (iii)
losses arising from customary bad boy acts such as fraud, or misappropriation of funds,
rents or insurance proceeds. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have interests in the unconsolidated joint ventures discussed in Note 6 to our condensed
consolidated financial statements. Our risk of loss is limited to our investment carrying amount.
We have no other material off-balance sheet arrangements that we expect would have a material
effect on our liquidity, capital resources or results of operations.
43
Contractual Obligations and Cash Requirements
As of March 31, 2011, our contractual obligations and commitments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 (1) |
|
|
2012-2013 |
|
|
2014-2015 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Contractual Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
590,371 |
|
|
$ |
433,356 |
|
|
$ |
313,267 |
|
|
$ |
264,803 |
|
|
$ |
1,601,797 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
56,678 |
|
|
$ |
94,424 |
|
|
$ |
55,907 |
|
|
$ |
158,834 |
|
|
$ |
365,843 |
|
Ground leases |
|
$ |
1,287 |
|
|
$ |
3,471 |
|
|
$ |
3,524 |
|
|
$ |
91,941 |
|
|
$ |
100,223 |
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
428 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
Commitments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
10,037 |
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
574 |
|
|
$ |
10,919 |
|
Development projects |
|
$ |
33,410 |
|
|
$ |
11,400 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
44,810 |
|
Loan fundings |
|
$ |
18,366 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,366 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts reflect obligations and commitments for the remaining nine months of 2011. |
The long-term debt amount shown above includes the balance outstanding on our credit facility,
our senior notes and our notes and bonds payable.
Interest expense shown above is estimated assuming the balance outstanding on the credit
facility remains constant until its maturity in December 2011 and that the interest rates in effect
at March 31, 2011 remain constant for the $33.6 million of variable rate notes and bonds payable.
Maturities of our senior notes range from 2011 to 2038 (although certain notes may be put back to
us at their face amount at the option of the holders at earlier dates) and maturities of our notes
and bonds payable range from 2012 to 2036.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on our mortgage loans
receivable and debt. We may hold derivative instruments to manage our exposure to these risks, and
all derivative instruments are matched against specific debt obligations. Readers are cautioned
that many of the statements contained in these paragraphs are forward-looking and should be read in
conjunction with our disclosures under the heading Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Disclosure
set forth above.
We provide mortgage loans to tenants of healthcare facilities as part of our normal
operations, which generally have fixed rates.
We utilize debt financing primarily for the purpose of making additional investments in
healthcare facilities. Historically, we have made short-term borrowings on our variable rate
unsecured revolving credit facility to fund our acquisitions until market conditions were
appropriate, based on managements judgment, to issue stock or fixed rate debt to provide long-term
financing.
At our option, borrowings under our credit facility bear interest at the prime rate (3.25% at
March 31, 2011) or applicable LIBOR plus 0.70% (0.95% at March 31, 2011). During the three months
ended March 31, 2011, the borrowings under our credit facility increased from $175.0 million to
$245.0 million. Additionally, a portion of our secured debt has variable rates.
For fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair market value, but do
not impact earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for variable rate debt, changes in interest rates
generally do not impact fair market value, but do affect the future earnings and cash flows. We
generally cannot prepay fixed rate debt prior to maturity. Therefore, interest rate risk and
changes in fair market value should not have a significant impact on the fixed rate debt until we
would be required to refinance such debt. Any future interest rate increases will increase the cost
of borrowings on our credit facility and any borrowings to refinance long-term debt as it matures
or to finance future acquisitions. Holding the variable rate debt balance at March 31, 2011
constant, each one percentage point increase in interest rates would result in an increase in interest expense for the remaining nine
months of 2011 of $2.1 million.
44
The table below sets forth certain information regarding our debt as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Fixed rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
$ |
991,633 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
61.9 |
% |
|
$ |
991,633 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
64.8 |
% |
Notes and bonds payable |
|
|
331,572 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
333,202 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed rate debt |
|
|
1,323,205 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
82.6 |
% |
|
|
1,324,835 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
86.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured senior credit facility |
|
|
245,000 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
Notes and bonds payable |
|
|
33,592 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
29,422 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable rate debt |
|
|
278,592 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
204,422 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
1,601,797 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,529,257 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During August 2010, we entered into six 12-month forward-starting interest rate swap
agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $250.0 million at a weighted average rate of 3.16%.
We entered into these swap agreements in order to hedge the expected interest payments associated
with fixed rate debt forecasted to be issued in 2011. The swap agreements each have an effective
date of August 1, 2011 and a termination date of August 1, 2021. We expect to settle the swap
agreements when the forecasted debt is issued. We assessed the effectiveness of these swap
agreements as hedges at inception and on March 31, 2011 and consider these swap agreements to be
highly effective cash flow hedges. The swap agreements are recorded under the caption Other
assets on our consolidated balance sheets at their aggregate estimated fair value of $12.2 million
at March 31, 2011.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Portfolio Officer, of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed or
submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Portfolio Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the quarterly
period covered by this report. No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred
during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
45
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are a party to various legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims (as
to some of which we may not be insured) that arise in the normal course of our business. Regardless
of their merits, these matters may require us to expend significant financial resources. Except as
described herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, we are
not aware of any other legal proceedings or claims that we believe may have, individually or taken
together, a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial position.
However, we are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of pending litigation and claims, and if our
assessment of our liability with respect to these actions and claims is incorrect, such actions and
claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial
position.
Stockholder Litigation
In the weeks following the announcement of the proposed Merger between us and Ventas on
February 28, 2011, purported stockholders filed seven lawsuits against us and our directors. The
purported stockholder plaintiffs commenced these actions in two jurisdictions: the Superior Court
of the State of California, Orange County (the California State Court); and the Circuit Court for
Baltimore City, Maryland (the Maryland State Court). All of these actions were brought as
putative class actions, and two also purport to assert derivative claims on behalf of the company.
All of these stockholder complaints allege that our directors breached certain alleged duties to
our stockholders by approving the Merger Agreement, and certain complaints allege that we aided and
abetted those breaches. All of the complaints request an injunction of the proposed Merger.
Certain of the complaints also seek damages.
In the California State Court, the following actions were filed purportedly on behalf of our
stockholders: on February 28, 2011, a putative class action entitled Palma v. Nationwide Health
Properties, Inc., et al.; on March 3, 2011, a putative class action entitled Barker v. Nationwide
Health Properties, Inc., et al.; and on March 3, 2011, a putative class action entitled Davis v.
Nationwide Health Properties, Inc., et al., which was subsequently amended on March 11, 2011 under
the caption Davids v. Nationwide Health Properties, Inc., et al. Each action names us and our
directors as defendants. Each complaint alleges, among other things, that our directors breached
certain alleged duties by approving the Merger Agreement because the proposed transaction
purportedly fails to maximize stockholder value and purportedly provides the directors personal
benefits not shared by our stockholders. The Palma and Davids actions allege that we aided and
abetted those purported breaches. Along with other relief, the complaints seek an injunction
against the closing of the proposed Merger. On March 22, 2011, the parties to the Palma, Barker,
and Davids actions signed a Stipulation and Proposed Order on Consolidation of Related Actions
providing for consolidation of all three actions. On April 4, 2011, the defendants in all three
actions demurred and moved to stay the proceedings in favor of parallel litigation pending in the
Maryland State Court.
In the Maryland State Court, the following actions were filed purportedly on behalf of our
stockholders: on March 7, 2011, a putative class action entitled Crowley v. Nationwide Health
Properties, Inc., et al.; on March 10, 2011, a putative class action entitled Taylor v. Nationwide
Health Properties, Inc., et. al.; on March 17, 2011, a putative class action entitled Haughey
Family Trust v. Pasquale, et al.; and on March 31, 2011, a putative class action entitled Rappaport
v. Pasquale, et al. All four actions name us and our directors as defendants. All four actions
allege, among other things, that our directors breached certain alleged duties by approving the
Merger Agreement because the proposed transaction purportedly fails to maximize stockholder value
and purportedly provides certain directors personal benefits not shared by our stockholders. The
Haughey, Rappaport and Crowley actions allege that we aided and abetted those purported breaches.
In addition to asserting direct claims on behalf of a putative class of our stockholders, the
Haughey and Rappaport actions purport to bring derivative claims on behalf of the company,
asserting breaches of certain alleged duties by our directors in connection with their approval of
the proposed Merger. All four actions seek to enjoin the proposed Merger, and the Taylor action
seeks damages.
On March 30, 2011, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the Maryland State Court entered an
order consolidating the Crowley, Taylor and Haughey actions. On April 1, 2011, pursuant to
stipulation of the parties, the Maryland State Court entered an order: (i) certifying a class of
our stockholders; and (ii) providing for the plaintiffs to file a consolidated amended complaint.
On April 13, 2011, the Maryland State Court held a status conference and thereafter entered certain scheduling orders. On April 22, 2011, the plaintiffs in Maryland
filed a consolidated amended class action complaint.
46
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
that May Yet be |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
Purchased Under |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
January 1, 2011 January 31, 2011 |
|
|
329 |
|
|
$ |
36.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2011 February 28, 2011 |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
38.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2011 March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
$ |
37.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares withheld by us to satisfy tax withholding due in connection with the
vesting of restricted stock awards. |
47
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Charter of the Company (Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K,
dated August 1, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Bylaws of the Company, as amended and restated on February 10, 2009 (Exhibit 3.1
to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 17, 2009, is
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of CEO and CFO. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
|
XBRL Instance Document* |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document* |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the
following materials, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Income
Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, (iii)
the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity for the three months
ended March 31, 2011, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and (v)
the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as
blocks of text. |
|
|
|
In accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related
information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 101, shall
not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), or Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or
otherwise subject to the liabilities of those sections, and is not
part of any registration statement to which it may relate, and shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or
other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,
except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such
filing or document. |
48
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 5, 2011 |
Nationwide Health Properties, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Abdo H. Khoury
|
|
|
|
Abdo H. Khoury |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial & Portfolio Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
49
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of CEO and CFO. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document* |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document* |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the
following materials, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Income
Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, (iii)
the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity for the three months
ended March 31, 2011, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and (v)
the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as
blocks of text. |
|
|
|
In accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related
information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 101, shall
not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), or Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or
otherwise subject to the liabilities of those sections, and is not
part of any registration statement to which it may relate, and shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or
other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,
except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such
filing or document. |
50