Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-22269
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Maureen A. Gemma
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(Registrants Telephone Number)
March 31
Date of Fiscal Year End
September 30, 2011
Date of Reporting Period
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
|
|
|
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities
Trust (EOT)
Semiannual Report
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits
or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository
institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including
possible loss of principal invested.
Semiannual Report September 30, 2011
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
Performance and Fund Profile |
|
|
2 |
|
Endnotes and Additional Disclosures |
|
|
3 |
|
Financial Statements |
|
|
4 |
|
Board of Trustees Contract Approval |
|
|
18 |
|
Officers and Trustees |
|
|
21 |
|
Important Notices |
|
|
22 |
|
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Portfolio Managers Cynthia J. Clemson and Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Symbol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EOT |
Inception Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/29/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Average Annual Total Returns at net asset value (NAV) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.63 |
|
One Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
Since Inception |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Average Annual Total Returns at market price, NYSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.25 |
|
One Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-1.82 |
|
Since Inception |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Premium/Discount to NAV (9/30/11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-4.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Market Yields2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Leverage3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual Interest Bond (RIB) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since Inception |
% Comparative Performance4 |
|
Six Months |
|
One Year |
|
5/29/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index |
|
|
13.31 |
|
|
|
4.31 |
|
|
|
9.44 |
|
Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) Average at NAV |
|
|
14.82 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
|
|
12.03 |
|
Credit Quality (% of total investments)5
The above chart includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles
established in connection with the RIB
financing3.
Absent such securities, the Funds credit quality (% of total investments) is as
follows5:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA |
|
1.6 |
|
BB |
|
|
5.9 |
|
AA |
|
27.1 |
|
B |
|
|
5.3 |
|
A |
|
26.4 |
|
CCC |
|
|
1.3 |
|
BBB |
|
28.6 |
|
Not Rated |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures on page 3.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by
determining the percentage change in net asset value or market price (as applicable) with all
distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due
to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply
and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value
will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost.
Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due
to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For
performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
2
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Endnotes and Additional Disclosures
|
|
1. |
Performance results reflect the effects of leverage. |
|
2. |
Market yields are calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share
(annualized) by the market price. Taxable-equivalent performance is based on the highest
federal income tax rate (35%). A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent
performance. Actual tax rate will vary depending on your income, exemptions and deductions.
Rate does not include state and local taxes. Distributions may be composed of tax-exempt
income, ordinary income, net realized capital gains and return of capital. |
|
3. |
Fund employs RIB financing. The leverage created by RIB investments provides an
opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the
likelihood of greater price volatility). The cost of leverage rises and falls with changes in
short-term interest rates. See Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities
Held in the notes to the financial statements for more information about RIB financing. RIB
leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of period end as a
percentage of Fund net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
|
4. |
Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of municipal
bonds traded in the U.S. with maturities of 22 years or more. Unless otherwise stated, indices
do not reflect any applicable sales charges, commissions, leverage, taxes or other expenses of
investing. Lipper Average reflects the average annual total return of funds in the same Lipper
classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest directly in an index or Lipper
classification. |
|
5. |
Ratings are based on Moodys, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based
largely on the rating agencys investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating
assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuers current
financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily
reflect its assessment of the volatility of a securitys market value or of the liquidity of
an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the
higher rating is shown. |
|
|
Fund profile subject to change due to active management. |
3
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Portfolio
of Investments (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Investments 112.5%
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cogeneration 1.1%
|
|
Maryland Energy Financing Administration, (AES Warrior Run),
(AMT), 7.40%, 9/1/19
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,503,450
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Resource
Recovery-Colver), (AMT), 5.125%, 12/1/15
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,972,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,475,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education 10.6%
|
|
Maine Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
(Bowdoin College),
5.00%, 7/1/39(1)
|
|
$
|
10,440
|
|
|
$
|
11,176,124
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Health and Education Facilities Authority,
(Dartmouth College),
5.25%, 6/1/39(1)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
13,320,360
|
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (Brooklyn Law School),
5.75%, 7/1/33
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,627,080
|
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (The New School),
5.75%, 7/1/50
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,253,920
|
|
|
|
Oregon Facilities Authority, (Lewis & Clark College),
5.625%, 10/1/36
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
|
|
1,182,868
|
|
|
|
University of Virginia,
5.00%, 6/1/40(2)
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
2,891,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,452,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric
Utilities 9.7%
|
|
Chula Vista, CA, (San Diego Gas and Electric),
5.875%, 1/1/34
|
|
$
|
3,650
|
|
|
$
|
4,063,545
|
|
|
|
Chula Vista, CA, (San Diego Gas and Electric),
5.875%, 2/15/34
|
|
|
2,815
|
|
|
|
3,133,939
|
|
|
|
Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Hawaiian Electric
Co.), 6.50%, 7/1/39
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
|
|
4,878,321
|
|
|
|
Matagorda County, TX, Navigation District No. 1, (Central
Power and Light Co.), 6.30%, 11/1/29
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
6,541,020
|
|
|
|
Pima County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Tucson
Electric Power Co.), 5.25%, 10/1/40
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,395,950
|
|
|
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power
District, AZ,
5.00%, 1/1/38(1)
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
9,603,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,616,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
Obligations 2.8%
|
|
California, 6.00%, 4/1/38
|
|
$
|
5,750
|
|
|
$
|
6,416,080
|
|
|
|
Will County, IL, Community Unit School District
No. 365-U,
(Valley View), 5.75%, 11/1/32
|
|
|
2,210
|
|
|
|
2,446,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,862,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care
Miscellaneous 2.5%
|
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(Community Hospital Group, Inc.), 5.75%, 10/1/31
|
|
$
|
7,435
|
|
|
$
|
7,999,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,999,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital 20.2%
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic
Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/34
|
|
$
|
980
|
|
|
$
|
1,060,899
|
|
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic
Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/39
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,073,160
|
|
|
|
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp.,
(Texas Childrens Hospital),
5.50%, 10/1/39(1)
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
13,038,369
|
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, (Provena Healthcare),
7.75%, 8/15/34
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,366,360
|
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, (Rush University Medical Center),
6.625%, 11/1/39
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,472,592
|
|
|
|
Johnson City, TN, Health & Educational Facilities
Board, (Mountain States Health Alliance), 6.00%, 7/1/38
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
1,745,020
|
|
|
|
Kansas Development Finance Authority, (Adventist Health System),
5.75%, 11/15/38
|
|
|
5,915
|
|
|
|
6,440,489
|
|
|
|
Maricopa County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Catholic
Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/39
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
3,574,726
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Tufts Medical
Center), 6.75%, 1/1/36
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
1,250,581
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Jordan Hospital), 6.75%, 10/1/33
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
3,730,848
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Lowell General Hospital), 4.75%, 7/1/25
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
1,451,297
|
|
|
|
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Henry Ford Health System),
5.25%, 11/15/46
|
|
|
7,395
|
|
|
|
7,212,787
|
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (NYU Hospital Center),
5.625%, 7/1/37
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,023,550
|
|
|
|
South Lake County, FL, Hospital District, (South Lake Hospital),
6.25%, 4/1/39
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
1,399,016
|
|
|
|
St. Paul, MN, Housing and Redevelopment Authority, (Health East
Project), 6.00%, 11/15/35
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
3,679,425
|
|
|
|
Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational and Facilities Board,
(Wellmont Health System), 5.25%, 9/1/36
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
2,932,776
|
|
|
|
Tyler, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., (East Texas
Medical Center), 5.375%, 11/1/37
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
4,012,110
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Wheaton
Franciscan Healthcare System), 5.125%, 8/15/30
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4,656,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,120,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
4
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Portfolio
of Investments (Unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing 4.2%
|
|
Maryland Community Development Administration, Department of
Housing and Community Development, (AMT),
5.15%, 9/1/42(1)
|
|
$
|
11,205
|
|
|
$
|
11,287,693
|
|
|
|
Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, Single Family Housing,
(FHLMC), (FNMA), (GNMA), 5.90%, 9/1/36
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,921,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,209,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Development
Revenue 19.1%
|
|
Alabama Industrial Development Authority, (Pine City Fiber Co.),
(AMT), 6.45%, 12/1/23
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,350,850
|
|
|
|
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District, (Dow Chemical
Co.), (AMT), 5.95%, 5/15/33
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,124,950
|
|
|
|
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Waste
Management, Inc.), (AMT), 5.125%, 11/1/23
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,149,400
|
|
|
|
Campbell County, WY, Solid Waste Facilities, (Basin Electric
Power Cooperative), 5.75%, 7/15/39
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,292,500
|
|
|
|
Clayton County, GA, Development Authority, (Delta Airlines,
Inc.), 8.75%, 6/1/29
|
|
|
3,420
|
|
|
|
3,956,324
|
|
|
|
Effingham County, GA, Solid Waste Disposal, (Fort James
Project), (AMT), 5.625%, 7/1/18
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
240,041
|
|
|
|
Goochland County, VA, Industrial Development Authority, (Nekoosa
Packaging Corp.), (AMT), 5.65%, 12/1/25
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
141,362
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast, TX, Waste Disposal Authority, (International Paper
Co.), (AMT), 6.10%, 8/1/24
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
2,789,792
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast, TX, Waste Disposal Authority, (Valero Energy Corp.),
(AMT), 6.65%, 4/1/32
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,005,570
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX, Airport System, (Continental Airlines), (AMT),
6.75%, 7/1/29
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
3,500,945
|
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, (Navistar International Corp.),
6.50%, 10/15/40
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
1,576,115
|
|
|
|
Indiana Financing Authority, (Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.),
6.00%, 8/1/39
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,737,600
|
|
|
|
Nevada Department of Business and Industry, (Republic Services,
Inc.), (AMT), 5.625% to 6/1/18 (Put Date), 12/1/26
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
2,010,096
|
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental
Airlines), (AMT), 6.25%, 9/15/29
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
2,877,000
|
|
|
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.),
5.25%, 10/1/35
|
|
|
3,070
|
|
|
|
3,163,512
|
|
|
|
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (American Airlines,
Inc.-JFK International Airport), (AMT), 7.75%, 8/1/31
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
5,611,424
|
|
|
|
Owen County, KY, (American Water Project), 6.25%, 6/1/39
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,172,590
|
|
|
|
Richland County, SC, (International Paper Co.), (AMT),
6.10%, 4/1/23
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
389,029
|
|
|
|
Sabine River Authority, LA, (International Paper Co.),
6.20%, 2/1/25
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
207,253
|
|
|
|
Selma, AL, Industrial Development Board, (International Paper
Co.), 5.80%, 5/1/34
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
873,775
|
|
|
|
St. John Baptist Parish, LA, (Marathon Oil Corp.),
5.125%, 6/1/37
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
|
1,545,954
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands, (HOVENSA, LLC), (AMT), 6.50%, 7/1/21
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
2,603,952
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA Refinery),
(AMT), 6.125%, 7/1/22
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
331,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,651,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Industrial
Development Revenue 0.5%
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (New
Jersey-American
Water Co., Inc.), (FGIC), (NPFG), (AMT), 5.375%, 5/1/32
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,700,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,700,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Lease
Revenue / Certificates of
Participation 1.0%
|
|
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., NY, (NPFG),
4.50%, 2/15/47
|
|
$
|
3,440
|
|
|
$
|
3,158,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,158,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Special Tax
Revenue 5.4%
|
|
Hesperia, CA, Community Redevelopment Agency, (XLCA),
5.00%, 9/1/25
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
191,329
|
|
|
|
Hesperia, CA, Public Financing Authority, (Redevelopment and
Housing Projects), (XLCA), 5.00%, 9/1/37
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
199,789
|
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities,
(AGC), 6.875%, (0.00% until 10/1/19), 10/1/34
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
2,914,400
|
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities,
(AGC), 7.00%, (0.00% until 10/1/19), 10/1/39
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
4,389,180
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC),
0.00%, 8/1/54
|
|
|
131,535
|
|
|
|
9,441,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,136,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured
Transportation 7.5%
|
|
Clark County, NV, (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport),
(AGM), 5.25%, 7/1/39
|
|
$
|
2,885
|
|
|
$
|
3,035,626
|
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern, CA, Transportation Corridor Agency, (NPFG),
0.00%, 1/15/30
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
1,219,600
|
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern, CA, Transportation Corridor Agency, (NPFG),
0.00%, 1/15/32
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
128,980
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
5
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Portfolio
of Investments (Unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured
Transportation (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway System),
(AGC), 0.00%, 1/1/35
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,136,600
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway System),
(AGC), 0.00%, 1/1/36
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
4,028,250
|
|
|
|
San Joaquin Hills, CA, Transportation Corridor Agency, Toll Road
Bonds, (NPFG), 0.00%, 1/15/32
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
1,843,200
|
|
|
|
San Jose, CA, Airport, (AGM), (AMBAC), (BHAC), (AMT),
6.00%, 3/1/47
|
|
|
7,850
|
|
|
|
8,310,560
|
|
|
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System),
(AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/15/34
|
|
|
4,480
|
|
|
|
1,092,538
|
|
|
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System),
(AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/15/35
|
|
|
1,745
|
|
|
|
394,579
|
|
|
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System),
(AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/15/37
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
|
|
934,324
|
|
|
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System),
(AMBAC), 5.00%, 8/15/42
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
1,607,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,731,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
Revenue / Certificates of
Participation 0.7%
|
|
Mohave County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Mohave
Prison LLC), 8.00%, 5/1/25
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,225,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,225,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue 4.7%
|
|
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center),
6.00%, 7/15/30
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
532,267
|
|
|
|
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center),
6.25%, 7/15/40
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
604,129
|
|
|
|
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center),
6.375%, 7/15/43
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
330,473
|
|
|
|
California County, CA, Tobacco Securitization Agency,
0.00%, 6/1/46
|
|
|
12,950
|
|
|
|
341,103
|
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, 5.30%, (0.00%
until 12/1/12), 6/1/37
|
|
|
4,430
|
|
|
|
2,824,125
|
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, 5.75%, 6/1/47
|
|
|
6,190
|
|
|
|
4,386,791
|
|
|
|
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, 6.00%, 6/1/48
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
1,103,279
|
|
|
|
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority,
6.875%, 6/1/42
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
1,610,496
|
|
|
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Revenue,
5.00%, 12/1/37
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,801,140
|
|
|
|
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Revenue,
5.25%, 9/1/26
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,464,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,998,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life
Care 2.4%
|
|
Bexar County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., (Army
Retirement Residence Foundation Project), 6.20%, 7/1/45
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,058,920
|
|
|
|
Douglas County, NE, Hospital Authority No. 2, (Immanuel
Obligated Group), 5.50%, 1/1/30
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
493,272
|
|
|
|
Douglas County, NE, Hospital Authority No. 2, (Immanuel
Obligated Group), 5.625%, 1/1/40
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
959,502
|
|
|
|
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
(Charlestown Community, Inc.), 6.125%, 1/1/30
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
503,168
|
|
|
|
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
(King Farm Presbyterian Community), 5.00%, 1/1/17
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
149,921
|
|
|
|
Mount Vernon, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Wartburg
Senior Housing, Inc.), 6.20%, 6/1/29
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
918,530
|
|
|
|
Washington Housing Finance Commission, (Wesley Homes),
6.20%, 1/1/36
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,429,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,512,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Tax
Revenue 3.3%
|
|
Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.625%, 12/1/29
|
|
$
|
1,625
|
|
|
$
|
1,665,479
|
|
|
|
Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.75%, 12/1/34
|
|
|
3,020
|
|
|
|
3,101,872
|
|
|
|
Heritage Harbor South, FL, Community Development District,
(Capital Improvements), 6.50%, 5/1/34
|
|
|
3,085
|
|
|
|
3,108,785
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/39
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
920,967
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
1,741,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,538,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Loan 1.9%
|
|
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, 6.00%, 1/1/28
|
|
$
|
5,475
|
|
|
$
|
6,037,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,037,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation 8.1%
|
|
Bay Area Toll Authority, CA, Toll Bridge Revenue, (San Francisco
Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/34
|
|
$
|
1,365
|
|
|
$
|
1,447,733
|
|
|
|
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, 5.75%, 1/1/31
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
329,153
|
|
|
|
Memphis-Shelby County, TN, Airport Authority, (AMT),
5.75%, 7/1/24
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
386,400
|
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, (Miami International Airport),
5.00%, 10/1/41
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
|
|
1,827,433
|
|
|
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority,
(Transportation System), 0.00%, 12/15/38
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
5,887,800
|
|
|
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, 5.75%, 1/1/38
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,154,150
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
6
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Portfolio
of Investments (Unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando-Orange County, FL, Expressway Authority,
5.00%, 7/1/35
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
792,112
|
|
|
|
St. Louis, MO, (Lambert-St. Louis International Airport),
6.625%, 7/1/34
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,461,000
|
|
|
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., (LBJ
Express Managed Lanes Project), 7.00%, 6/30/34
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
2,859,124
|
|
|
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., (North
Tarrant Express Managed Lanes Project), 6.875%, 12/31/39
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
1,632,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,777,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water and
Sewer 6.8%
|
|
Atlanta, GA, Water & Wastewater Revenue,
6.25%, 11/1/34
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,366,480
|
|
|
|
Marco Island, FL, Utility System, 5.00%, 10/1/34
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
577,440
|
|
|
|
Marco Island, FL, Utility System, 5.00%, 10/1/40
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
2,538,635
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, (Waterworks
Revenue Authorization), 5.00%, 7/1/29
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,221,420
|
|
|
|
New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and
Sewer System),
5.25%, 6/15/40(1)
|
|
|
11,700
|
|
|
|
12,827,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,531,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tax-Exempt
Investments 112.5%
|
|
|
(identified cost $323,878,552)
|
|
$
|
356,734,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets, Less
Liabilities (12.5)%
|
|
$
|
(39,732,797
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets 100.0%
|
|
$
|
317,002,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the
Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
|
|
|
AGC
|
|
- Assured Guaranty Corp.
|
AGM
|
|
- Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
|
AMBAC
|
|
- AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
|
AMT
|
|
- Interest earned from these securities may be considered a
tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative
Minimum Tax.
|
BHAC
|
|
- Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
|
FGIC
|
|
- Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
|
FHLMC
|
|
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
|
FNMA
|
|
- Federal National Mortgage Association
|
GNMA
|
|
- Government National Mortgage Association
|
NPFG
|
|
- National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
|
XLCA
|
|
- XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
|
At September 30, 2011, the concentration of the
Trusts investments in the various states, determined as a
percentage of total investments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
14.0%
|
|
California
|
|
|
12.3%
|
|
Others, representing less than 10% individually
|
|
|
73.7%
|
|
The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by
municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt
securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic
developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to
reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at
September 30, 2011, 12.8% of total investments are backed
by bond insurance of various financial institutions and
financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage
insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.1%
to 6.1% of total investments.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that
issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1H). |
|
(2) |
|
Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin
requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
7
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Statement
of Assets and Liabilities (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Investments, at value (identified cost, $323,878,552)
|
|
$
|
356,734,886
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
5,454,866
|
|
|
|
Receivable for investments sold
|
|
|
87,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
362,277,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued
|
|
$
|
44,430,000
|
|
|
|
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts
|
|
|
85,547
|
|
|
|
Due to custodian
|
|
|
389,863
|
|
|
|
Payable to affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment adviser and administration fee
|
|
|
177,666
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and fees payable
|
|
|
100,013
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
92,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
45,275,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
317,002,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets
|
|
Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares
authorized
|
|
$
|
152,944
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
291,528,050
|
|
|
|
Accumulated net realized loss
|
|
|
(6,984,861
|
)
|
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
510,523
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
31,795,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
317,002,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
15,294,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value
|
|
Net assets
¸
common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
$
|
20.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
8
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Statement
of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
10,608,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
10,608,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Investment adviser and administration fee
|
|
$
|
1,064,104
|
|
|
|
Trustees fees and expenses
|
|
|
5,777
|
|
|
|
Custodian fee
|
|
|
70,136
|
|
|
|
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees
|
|
|
7,044
|
|
|
|
Legal and accounting services
|
|
|
28,533
|
|
|
|
Printing and postage
|
|
|
21,905
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and fees
|
|
|
191,666
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
31,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
$
|
1,420,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of custodian fee
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense reductions
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expenses
|
|
$
|
1,419,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
9,189,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|
Net realized gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment transactions
|
|
$
|
1,248,883
|
|
|
|
Financial futures contracts
|
|
|
(7,637,075
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized loss
|
|
$
|
(6,388,192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
28,760,626
|
|
|
|
Financial futures contracts
|
|
|
(979,890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
$
|
27,780,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain
|
|
$
|
21,392,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
30,581,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
9
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Statements
of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
in Net Assets
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
From operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
9,189,190
|
|
|
$
|
19,462,831
|
|
|
|
Net realized loss from investment transactions and financial
futures contracts
|
|
|
(6,388,192
|
)
|
|
|
(1,052,830
|
)
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from
investments and financial futures contracts
|
|
|
27,780,736
|
|
|
|
(26,734,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
30,581,734
|
|
|
$
|
(8,324,747
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
$
|
(9,074,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,952,894
|
)
|
|
|
From net realized gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,913,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders
|
|
$
|
(9,074,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,866,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital share transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of distributions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
357,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
357,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|
$
|
21,506,995
|
|
|
$
|
(28,833,060
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
At beginning of period
|
|
$
|
295,495,094
|
|
|
$
|
324,328,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of period
|
|
$
|
317,002,089
|
|
|
$
|
295,495,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net
investment income
included in net assets
|
|
At end of period
|
|
$
|
510,523
|
|
|
$
|
396,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
10
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Statement
of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Cash Flows From
Operating Activities
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
30,581,734
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from
operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments purchased
|
|
|
(8,644,648
|
)
|
|
|
Investments sold
|
|
|
19,646,825
|
|
|
|
Net amortization/accretion of premium (discount)
|
|
|
(1,467,443
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in interest receivable
|
|
|
121,506
|
|
|
|
Increase in receivable for investments sold
|
|
|
(78,556
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in receivable for variation margin on open financial
futures contracts
|
|
|
16,406
|
|
|
|
Decrease in payable for when-issued securities
|
|
|
(1,153,781
|
)
|
|
|
Increase in payable for variation margin on open financial
futures contracts
|
|
|
85,547
|
|
|
|
Increase in payable to affiliate for investment adviser and
administration fee
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
Increase in interest expense and fees payable
|
|
|
5,540
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accrued expenses
|
|
|
(22,221
|
)
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from
investments
|
|
|
(28,760,626
|
)
|
|
|
Net realized gain from investments
|
|
|
(1,248,883
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
9,083,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
Distributions paid, net of reinvestments
|
|
$
|
(9,074,739
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in due to custodian
|
|
|
(8,492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
$
|
(9,083,231
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash
flow information:
|
|
Cash paid for interest and fees
|
|
$
|
186,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
11
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
March 31,
2010(1)
|
|
|
|
Net asset value Beginning of period
|
|
$
|
19.320
|
|
|
$
|
21.230
|
|
|
$
|
19.100
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Operations
|
|
Net investment
income(3)
|
|
$
|
0.601
|
|
|
$
|
1.273
|
|
|
$
|
1.007
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
1.402
|
|
|
|
(1.818
|
)
|
|
|
2.164
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
2.003
|
|
|
$
|
(0.545
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Distributions
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
$
|
(0.593
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.240
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.930
|
)
|
|
|
From net realized gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.125
|
)
|
|
|
(0.079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions
|
|
$
|
(0.593
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.365
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.009
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering costs charged to paid-in
capital(3)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.032
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value End of period
|
|
$
|
20.730
|
|
|
$
|
19.320
|
|
|
$
|
21.230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value End of period
|
|
$
|
19.740
|
|
|
$
|
18.630
|
|
|
$
|
20.260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return on Net Asset
Value(4)
|
|
|
10.63
|
%(5)
|
|
|
(2.61
|
)%
|
|
|
16.96
|
%(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return on Market
Value(4)
|
|
|
9.25
|
%(5)
|
|
|
(1.60
|
)%
|
|
|
11.62
|
%(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data
|
|
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)
|
|
$
|
317,002
|
|
|
$
|
295,495
|
|
|
$
|
324,328
|
|
|
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses excluding interest and
fees(7)
|
|
|
0.80
|
%(8)
|
|
|
0.81
|
%
|
|
|
0.82
|
%(8)
|
|
|
Interest and fee
expense(9)
|
|
|
0.12
|
%(8)
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.12
|
%(8)
|
|
|
Total
expenses(7)
|
|
|
0.92
|
%(8)
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
%(8)
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
5.98
|
%(8)
|
|
|
6.08
|
%
|
|
|
5.84
|
%(8)
|
|
|
Portfolio Turnover
|
|
|
2
|
%(5)
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the period from the start of business, May 29, 2009, to
March 31, 2010. |
(2) |
|
Net asset value at beginning of period reflects the deduction of
the sales load of $0.90 per share paid by the shareholder from
the $20.00 offering price. |
(3) |
|
Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(4) |
|
Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the
percentage change in net asset value or market value with all
distributions reinvested. |
(5) |
|
Not annualized. |
(6) |
|
Total investment return on net asset value is calculated
assuming a purchase at the offering price of $20.00 less the
sales load of $0.90 per share paid by the shareholder on the
first day and a sale at the net asset value on the last day of
the period reported with all distributions reinvested. Total
investment return on market value is calculated assuming a
purchase at the offering price of $20.00 less the sales load of
$0.90 per share paid by the shareholder on the first day and a
sale at the current market price on the last day of the period
reported with all distributions reinvested. |
(7) |
|
Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than
0.005%. |
(8) |
|
Annualized. |
(9) |
|
Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating
rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond
transactions (see Note 1H). |
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
12
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Notes
to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1 Significant
Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust (the Trust)
is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a
diversified, closed-end management investment company. The
Trusts primary investment objective is to provide current
income exempt from regular federal income tax. The Trust will,
as a secondary investment objective, seek to achieve capital
appreciation.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of
the Trust. The policies are in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
A Investment
Valuation Debt obligations (including
short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than
sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations
provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such
services pricing models. Inputs to the models may include,
but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and
asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of
securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or
information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and
economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach,
which considers information regarding securities with similar
characteristics to determine the valuation for a security.
Short-term obligations purchased with a remaining maturity of
sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which
approximates market value. Financial futures contracts are
valued at the closing settlement price established by the board
of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Investments for
which valuations or market quotations are not readily available
or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods
determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees
of the Trust in a manner that fairly reflects the
securitys value, or the amount that the Trust might
reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current
sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on
a consideration of relevant factors, which are likely to vary
from one pricing context to another. These factors may include,
but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of
any contractual restrictions on the securitys disposition,
the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of
the issuer or of comparable entities, quotations or relevant
information obtained from broker/dealers or other market
participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts,
and/or the
appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an
analysis of the entitys financial condition, and an
evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the
market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions and
Related Income Investment transactions for
financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date
basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are
determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is
recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for
amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
C Federal
Taxes The Trusts policy is to comply
with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to
regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders
each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and
tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all
of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for
federal income or excise tax is necessary. The Trust intends to
satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate
distributions from the interest income generated by its
investments in municipal obligations, which are exempt from
regular federal income tax when received by the Trust, as
exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any,
earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7,
1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.
At March 31, 2011, the Trust had a net capital loss of
$1,680,954 attributable to security transactions incurred after
October 31, 2010. This net capital loss is treated as
arising on the first day of the Trusts taxable year ending
March 31, 2012.
As of September 30, 2011, the Trust had no uncertain tax
positions that would require financial statement recognition,
de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Trusts federal
tax returns filed since the start of business on May 29,
2009 to March 31, 2011 remains subject to examination by
the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expense
Reduction State Street Bank and
Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Trust.
Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced
by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash
balance the Trust maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if
any, used to reduce the Trusts custodian fees are reported
as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
E Legal
Fees Legal fees and other related expenses
incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of
capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the
restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment
are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect
or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.
F Use of
Estimates The preparation of the financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
G Indemnifications
Under the Trusts organizational documents, its officers
and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and
expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the
Trust. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail,
shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as the
Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the
obligations of the Trust. However, the Trusts Declaration
of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part
of Trust shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust
shall assume the defense on behalf of any Trust shareholders.
Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of
Trust property of any shareholder held personally liable solely
by
13
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Notes
to Financial Statements (Unaudited) continued
reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or
expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal
course of business, the Trust enters into agreements with
service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The
Trusts maximum exposure under these arrangements is
unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made
against the Trust that have not yet occurred.
H Floating Rate
Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities
Held The Trust may invest in residual
interest bonds, also referred to as inverse floating rate
securities, whereby the Trust may sell a variable or fixed rate
bond to a broker for cash. At the same time, the Trust buys a
residual interest in the assets and cash flows of a
Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized
as a trust), set up by the broker. The broker deposits a bond
into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the bond sold to the
broker by the Trust, and which may have been, but is not
required to be, the bond purchased from the Trust (the Bond).
The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes)
which are sold to third-parties. The residual interest bond held
by the Trust gives the Trust the right (1) to cause the
holders of the Floating Rate Notes to generally tender their
notes at par, and (2) to have the broker transfer the Bond
held by the SPV to the Trust, thereby terminating the SPV.
Should the Trust exercise such right, it would generally pay the
broker the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and
exchange the residual interest bond for the underlying Bond.
Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for
transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment
of liabilities, the Trust accounts for the transaction described
above as a secured borrowing by including the Bond in its
Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a
liability under the caption Payable for floating rate
notes issued in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset
weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes
to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date. Interest
expense related to the Trusts liability with respect to
Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be
terminated by the Trust, as noted above, or by the broker upon
the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the
trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of
the underlying Bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the
issuer of the underlying Bond, the inability to remarket
Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient
buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain
renewal of the liquidity agreement under which liquidity support
is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. At
September 30, 2011, the amount of the Trusts Floating
Rate Notes outstanding and the related collateral were
$44,430,000 and $71,253,696, respectively. The range of interest
rates on the Floating Rate Notes outstanding at
September 30, 2011 was 0.16% to 0.22%. For the six months
ended September 30, 2011, the Trusts average Floating
Rate Notes outstanding and the average interest rate
(annualized) including fees were $44,430,000 and 0.86%,
respectively.
The Trust may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements
with the broker by which the Trust agrees to reimburse the
broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the
liquidation value of the Bond held by the SPV and the
liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any
shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Trust had no shortfalls
as of September 30, 2011.
The Trust may also purchase residual interest bonds from brokers
in a secondary market transaction without first owning the
underlying bond. Such transactions are not required to be
treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any,
related to residual interest bonds purchased in a secondary
market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments.
The Trusts investment policies and restrictions expressly
permit investments in residual interest bonds. Such bonds
typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields
available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and
maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for
fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate
environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate
bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and
income of residual interest bonds are generally more volatile
than that of a fixed rate bond. The Trusts investment
policies do not allow the Trust to borrow money except as
permitted by the 1940 Act. Management believes that the
Trusts restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior
securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply
to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a
liability in the Trusts Statement of Assets and
Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating
Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior
securities to which the Trusts restrictions apply.
Residual interest bonds held by the Trust are securities exempt
from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of
1933.
I Financial Futures
Contracts Upon entering into a financial
futures contract, the Trust is required to deposit with the
broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a
certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin).
Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or
received by the Trust each business day, depending on the daily
fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are
recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Trust. Gains
(losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the
financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change
unexpectedly, the Trust may not achieve the anticipated benefits
of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.
Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are
exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is
substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty
performance.
J When-Issued Securities and
Delayed Delivery Transactions The Trust may
purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued
basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary
settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction
is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered
is fixed. The Trust maintains security positions for these
commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available
to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a
delayed delivery or when-issued basis are
marked-to-market
daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may
arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying
securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the
contract.
K Statement of Cash
Flows The cash amount shown in the Statement
of Cash Flows of the Trust is the amount included in the
Trusts Statement of Assets and Liabilities and represents
the cash on hand at its custodian and does not include any
short-term investments.
14
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Notes
to Financial Statements (Unaudited) continued
L Interim Financial
Statements The interim financial statements
relating to September 30, 2011 and for the six months then
ended have not been audited by an independent registered public
accounting firm, but in the opinion of the Trusts
management, reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of
the financial statements.
2 Distributions
to Shareholders
The Trust intends to make monthly distributions of net
investment income to shareholders. In addition, at least
annually, the Trust intends to distribute all or substantially
all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available
capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any).
Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Trust
distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a
financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America require that only
distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be
reported in the financial statements as a return of capital.
Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating
to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax
purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are
considered to be from ordinary income.
3 Investment
Adviser and Administration Fee and Other Transactions with
Affiliates
The investment adviser and administration fee is earned by EVM
as compensation for investment advisory and administrative
services rendered to the Trust. The fee is computed at an annual
rate of 0.60% of the Trusts average daily gross assets up
to $1.5 billion and 0.59% of average daily gross assets of
$1.5 billion or more, and is payable monthly. Average daily
gross assets include the principal amount of any indebtedness
for money borrowed, including debt securities issued by the
Trust. Average daily gross assets are calculated by adding to
net assets the amount payable by the Trust to floating rate note
holders. For the six months ended September 30, 2011, the
investment adviser and administration fee incurred by the Trust
and the effective annual rate, as a percentage of average daily
gross assets, were $1,064,104 and 0.60%, respectively.
Except for Trustees of the Trust who are not members of
EVMs organization, officers and Trustees receive
remuneration for their services to the Trust out of the
investment adviser and administration fee. Trustees of the Trust
who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to
defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in
accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation
Plan. For the six months ended September 30, 2011, no
significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and
Trustees of the Trust are officers of EVM.
4 Purchases
and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term
obligations, aggregated $8,644,648 and $19,646,825,
respectively, for the six months ended September 30, 2011.
5 Shares
of Beneficial Interest
The Trust may issue common shares pursuant to its dividend
reinvestment plan. For the six months ended September 30,
2011, there were no transactions in common shares by the Trust.
For the year ended March 31, 2011, the Trust issued 16,822
common shares pursuant to its dividend reinvestment plan.
6 Federal
Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
investments of the Trust at September 30, 2011, as
determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost
|
|
$
|
278,193,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
34,691,943
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
(580,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
34,111,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 Overdraft
Advances
Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT may, in its
discretion, advance funds to the Trust to make properly
authorized payments. When such payments result in an overdraft,
the Trust is obligated to repay SSBT at the current rate of
interest charged by SSBT for secured loans (currently, a rate
above the Federal Funds rate). This obligation is payable on
demand to SSBT. SSBT has a lien on the Trusts assets to
the extent of any overdraft. At September 30, 2011, the
Trust had a payment due to SSBT pursuant to the foregoing
arrangement of $389,863.
15
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Notes
to Financial Statements (Unaudited) continued
8 Financial
Instruments
The Trust may trade in financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities.
These financial instruments may include financial futures
contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk
in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement
purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these
instruments represent the investment the Trust has in particular
classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily
represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The
measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is
meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are
considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at
September 30, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
Contracts
|
|
Position
|
|
Cost
|
|
Value
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
12/11
|
|
175
U.S. 10-Year
Treasury Note
|
|
Short
|
|
$
|
(22,585,617
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,766,406
|
)
|
|
$
|
(180,789
|
)
|
|
|
12/11
|
|
125
U.S. 30-Year
Treasury Bond
|
|
Short
|
|
|
(16,948,013
|
)
|
|
|
(17,828,125
|
)
|
|
|
(880,112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,060,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2011, the Trust had sufficient cash
and/or
securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Trust is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course
of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Trust holds
fixed-rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if
interest rates rise. The Trust purchases and sells U.S. Treasury
futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
The fair value of open derivative instruments (not considered to
be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and
whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk at
September 30, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Asset Derivative
|
|
Liability Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,060,901
|
)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,060,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represents cumulative unrealized depreciation on futures
contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current
days variation margin on open futures contracts is
reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as
Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be
hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the
Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk
exposure is interest rate risk for the six months ended
September 30, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Gain (Loss)
|
|
Change in Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
on Derivatives Recognized
|
|
Appreciation (Depreciation) on
|
|
|
|
|
in
Income(1)
|
|
Derivatives Recognized in
Income(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts
|
|
$
|
(7,637,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
(979,890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain
(loss) Financial futures contracts. |
(2) |
|
Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) Financial futures
contracts. |
The average notional amount of futures contracts outstanding
during the six months ended September 30, 2011, which is
indicative of the volume of this derivative type, was
approximately $41,429,000.
16
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Notes
to Financial Statements (Unaudited) continued
9 Fair
Value Measurements
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value
measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the
assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation
techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of
inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
|
|
|
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for
identical investments
|
|
|
Level 2 other significant observable inputs
(including quoted prices for similar investments, interest
rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
|
|
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs
(including a funds own assumptions in determining the fair
value of investments)
|
In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in
different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level
disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The
inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not
necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing
in those securities.
At September 30, 2011, the hierarchy of inputs used in
valuing the Trusts investments and open derivative
instruments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Description
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
356,734,886
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
356,734,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
356,734,886
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
356,734,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts
|
|
$
|
(1,060,901
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,060,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(1,060,901
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,060,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Trust held no investments or other financial instruments as
of March 31, 2011 whose fair value was determined using
Level 3 inputs. At September 30, 2011, the value of
investments transferred between Level 1 and Level 2,
if any, during the six months then ended was not significant.
17
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Board
of Trustees Contract Approval
Overview
of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940
Act), provides, in substance, that each investment
advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser
will continue in effect from year to year only if its
continuance is approved at least annually by the funds
board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the
trustees who are not interested persons of the fund
(Independent Trustees), cast in person at a meeting
called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a
Board) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the
Eaton Vance Funds) held on April 25, 2011, the
Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted
to approve continuation of existing advisory and
sub-advisory
agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year
period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the
affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of
the Board, which is a committee comprised exclusively of
Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the
Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a
series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held between
February and April 2011. Such information included, among
other things, the following:
Information about
Fees, Performance and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees
paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds;
|
|
|
An independent report comparing each funds total expense
ratio and its components to comparable funds;
|
|
|
An independent report comparing the investment performance of
each fund (including yield data and Sharpe and information
ratios where relevant) to the investment performance of
comparable funds over various time periods;
|
|
|
Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant
peer groups of similarly managed funds and appropriate indices;
|
|
|
For each fund, comparative information concerning the fees
charged and the services provided by each adviser in managing
other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment
strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such
fund;
|
|
|
Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each
fund;
|
Information about
Portfolio Management
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptions of the investment management services provided to
each fund, including the investment strategies and processes
employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and
personnel;
|
|
|
Information about the allocation of brokerage and the benefits
received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation,
including information concerning the acquisition of research
through client commission arrangements
and/or the
funds policies with respect to soft dollar
arrangements;
|
|
|
Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund;
|
|
|
The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of
fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the
effectiveness of such procedures and processes;
|
Information about
each Adviser
|
|
|
|
|
Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each
adviser;
|
|
|
Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of
the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities
include portfolio management and investment research for the
funds, and information relating to their compensation and
responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and
investment accounts;
|
|
|
Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its
affiliates, together with information relating to compliance
with and the administration of such codes;
|
|
|
Copies of or descriptions of each advisers policies and
procedures relating to proxy voting, the handling of corporate
actions and class actions;
|
|
|
Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance
efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf
of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance
programs) and their record of compliance with investment
policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to
market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure,
and with policies on personal securities transactions;
|
|
|
Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery
plans of each adviser and its affiliates;
|
|
|
A description of Eaton Vance Managements procedures for
overseeing third party advisers and
sub-advisers;
|
Other Relevant
Information
|
|
|
|
|
Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the
administrative and other non-investment management services
provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates;
|
|
|
Information concerning management of the relationship with the
custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or
the funds administrator; and
|
|
|
The terms of each advisory agreement.
|
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract
Review Committee considered information provided from time to
time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the
Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month
period ended April 30, 2011, with respect to one
18
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Board
of Trustees Contract Approval continued
or more funds, the Board met nine times and the Contract Review
Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the
Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and
Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee
comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met nine, fifteen,
seven, eight and twelve times, respectively. At such meetings,
the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the
portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each
adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and
the investment strategies used in pursuing the funds
investment objective including, where relevant, the use of
derivative instruments, as well as trading policies and
procedures and risk management techniques.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios,
the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s)
when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In
addition, in cases where the funds investment adviser has
engaged a
sub-adviser,
the Board considered similar information about the
sub-adviser
when considering the approval of any
sub-advisory
agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the
contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel
for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review
Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own
business judgment in determining the material factors to be
considered in evaluating each advisory and
sub-advisory
agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The
conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and
sub-advisory
agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the
information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each
member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying
emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with
respect to each advisory and
sub-advisory
agreement.
Results
of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other
information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and
conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee
concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory and
administrative agreement of the Eaton Vance National Municipal
Opportunities Trust (the Fund) with Eaton Vance
Management (the Adviser), including its fee
structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore,
the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval
of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the
Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and
conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with
respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a
majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve
continuation of the investment advisory and administrative
agreement for the Fund.
Nature,
Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory and
administrative agreement of the Fund, the Board evaluated the
nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by
the Adviser.
The Board considered the Advisers management capabilities
and investment process with respect to the types of investments
held by the Fund, including the education, experience and number
of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide
portfolio management, investment research, and similar services
to the Fund. In particular, the Board evaluated, where relevant,
the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in
analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency and
special considerations relevant to investing in municipal
obligations, Treasury securities and other securities backed by
the U.S. government or its agencies. The Board considered the
Advisers large municipal bond team, which includes
portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services
to the Fund. The Board also took into account the resources
dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including
the compensation methods of the Adviser to recruit and retain
investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the
Fund by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser
and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board
considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal
trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of
portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio
valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment
opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the
Adviser and its affiliates to requests in recent years from
regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative
services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its
affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services.
The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in
a fund that is a part of a large family of funds.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the
Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services
provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and
consistent with the terms of the investment advisory and
administrative agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Funds investment performance to a
relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an
independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The
Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-year
period ended September 30, 2010 for the Fund. In light of
the Funds relatively brief operating history, the Board
concluded that additional time is required to evaluate Fund
performance.
19
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Board
of Trustees Contract Approval continued
Management
Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates,
including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Fund
(referred to collectively as management fees). As
part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and
the Funds total expense ratio for the year ended
September 30, 2010, as compared to a group of similarly
managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The
Board also considered factors that had an impact on Fund expense
ratios, as identified by management in response to inquiries
from the Contract Review Committee, as well as actions being
taken to reduce expenses at the Eaton Vance fund complex level,
including the negotiation of reduced fees for transfer agency
and custody services.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the
nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the
Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged
for advisory and related services are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser
and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory
and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance
Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits
realized with and without regard to revenue sharing or other
payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in
respect of distribution services. The Board also considered
other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and
its affiliates in connection with their relationship with the
Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be
available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions
effected for the Fund and other investment advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and
the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the
profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are
reasonable.
Economies
of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also
considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates,
on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to
realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the
Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in
accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies
of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or
group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the
increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all
Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and
evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the
Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may
have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon
the foregoing, the Board concluded that the Fund currently
shares in the benefits from economies of scale. The Board also
concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the
assets of the Fund, the structure of the advisory fee, which
includes breakpoints at different asset levels, will allow the
Fund to continue to benefit from economies of scale in the
future.
20
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
Officers of Eaton Vance National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
|
|
|
Cynthia J. Clemson President
Payson F. Swaffield Vice President
|
|
Barbara E. Campbell Treasurer
Maureen A. Gemma Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
Paul M. ONeil Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
|
|
Trustees of Eaton Vance National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
|
|
|
Ralph F. Verni Chairman
Scott E. Eston
Benjamin C. Esty
Thomas E. Faust Jr.*
Allen R. Freedman
|
|
William H. Park
Ronald A. Pearlman
Helen Frame Peters
Lynn A. Stout
Harriett Tee Taggart
|
Number of
Employees
The Trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended,
as a closed-end management investment company and has no
employees.
Number of
Shareholders
As of September 30, 2011, Trust records indicate that there
are 8 registered shareholders and approximately 8,137
shareholders owning the Trust shares in street name, such as
through brokers, banks, and financial intermediaries.
If you are a street name shareholder and wish to receive Trust
reports directly, which contain important information about the
Trust, please write or call:
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
1-800-262-1122
New York Stock
Exchange Symbol
The New York Stock Exchange symbol is EOT.
21
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
September 30, 2011
Privacy. The
Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial
privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has
in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with
respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
|
|
|
Only such information received from you, through application
forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund
transactions will be collected. This may include information
such as name, address, social security number, tax status,
account balances and transactions.
|
|
|
None of such information about you (or former customers) will be
disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes
disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In
the normal course of servicing a customers account, Eaton
Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that
perform various required services such as transfer agents,
custodians and broker/dealers.
|
|
|
Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and
procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect
the confidentiality of such information.
|
|
|
We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time
upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review
our Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our
homepage: www.eatonvance.com.
|
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within
the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds,
Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Eaton
Vance Distributors, Inc., Eaton Vance Trust Company, Eaton
Vance Managements Real Estate Investment Group and Boston
Management and Research. In addition, our Privacy Policy applies
only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who
have a direct relationship with us. If a customers account
(i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party
financial advisor/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such
advisors privacy policies apply to the customer. This
notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures. For
more information about Eaton Vances Privacy Policy, please
call
1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder
Documents. The Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) permits funds to deliver only one copy of
shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements
and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple
accounts at the same residential or post office box address.
This practice is often called householding and it
helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders. Eaton
Vance, or your financial advisor, may household the mailing of
your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or
your financial advisor, otherwise. If you would prefer that
your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact
Eaton Vance at
1-800-262-1122,
or contact your financial advisor. Your instructions that
householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents
will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance
or your financial advisor.
Portfolio
Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its
underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of
portfolio holdings on
Form N-Q
with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal
year. The
Form N-Q
will be available on the Eaton Vance website at
www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at
1-800-262-1122
or in the EDGAR database on the SECs website at
www.sec.gov.
Form N-Q
may also be reviewed and copied at the SECs public
reference room in Washington, D.C. (call
1-800-732-0330
for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy
Voting. From time to time, funds are required to
vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The
Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable)
vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures
approved by the Funds and Portfolios Boards. You may
obtain a description of these policies and procedures and
information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies
relating to portfolio securities during the most recent
12-month
period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by
calling
1-800-262-1122
and by accessing the SECs website at www.sec.gov.
Additional Notice to
Shareholders. A Fund may purchase shares of its
common stock in the open market when they trade at a discount to
net asset value or at other times if the Fund determines such
purchases are advisable. There can be no assurance that a Fund
will take such action or that such purchases would reduce the
discount.
Closed-End Fund
Information. The Eaton Vance closed-end funds
make certain quarterly fund performance data and information
about portfolio characteristics (such as top holdings and asset
allocation) available on the Eaton Vance website after the end
of each calendar quarter-end. Certain month end fund performance
data for the funds, including total returns, are posted to the
website shortly after the end of each calendar month. Portfolio
holdings for the most recent calendar quarter-end are also
posted to the website approximately 30 days following the end of
the quarter. This information is available at www.eatonvance.com
on the fund information pages under Individual
Investors Closed-End Funds.
22
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment
Adviser and Administrator
Eaton
Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Custodian
State
Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer
Agent
American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
Plaza Level
New York, NY 10038
Fund
Offices
Two
International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The registrant undertakes to provide
a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling
1-800-262-1122.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrants Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit
committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is a consultant and
private investor. Previously, he served as the Chief Financial Officer of Aveon Group, L.P. (an
investment management firm), as the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty
finance company), as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC
(investment management firm), as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United
Asset Management
Corporation (an institutional investment management firm) and as a Senior Manager at Price
Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Not required in this filing.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not required in this filing.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of
this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment
Companies
The Board of Trustees of the Trust has adopted a proxy voting policy and procedure (the Fund
Policy), pursuant to which the Trustees have delegated proxy voting responsibility to the Funds
investment adviser and adopted the investment advisers proxy voting policies and procedures (the
Policies) which are described below. The Trustees will review the Funds proxy voting records
from time to time and will annually consider approving the Policies for the upcoming year. In the
event that a conflict of interest arises between the Funds shareholders and the investment
adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund, the investment
adviser will generally refrain from voting the proxies related to the companies giving rise to such
conflict until it consults with the Boards Special Committee except as contemplated under the Fund
Policy. The Boards Special Committee will instruct the investment adviser on the appropriate
course of action.
The Policies are designed to promote accountability of a companys management to its shareholders
and to align the interests of management with those shareholders. An independent proxy
voting service (Agent), currently Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., has been retained to
assist in the voting of proxies through the provision of vote analysis, implementation and
recordkeeping and disclosure services. The investment adviser will generally vote proxies through
the Agent. The Agent is required to vote all proxies and/or refer them back to the investment
adviser pursuant to the Policies. It is generally the policy of the investment adviser to vote in
accordance with the recommendation of the Agent. The Agent shall refer to the investment adviser
proxies relating to mergers and restructurings, and the disposition of assets, termination,
liquidation and mergers contained in mutual fund proxies. The investment adviser will normally
vote against anti-takeover measures and other proposals designed to limit the ability of
shareholders to act on possible transactions, except in the case of closed-end management
investment companies. The investment adviser generally supports management on social and
environmental proposals. The investment adviser may abstain from voting from time to time where it
determines that the costs associated with voting a proxy outweighs the benefits derived from
exercising the right to vote or the economic effect on shareholders interests or the value of the
portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant.
In addition, the investment adviser will monitor situations that may result in a conflict of
interest between the Funds shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of
their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund by maintaining a list of significant existing and
prospective corporate clients. The investment advisers personnel responsible for reviewing and
voting proxies on behalf of the Fund will report any proxy received or expected to be received from
a company included on that
list to the personnel of the investment adviser identified in the Policies. If such personnel
expects to instruct the Agent to vote such proxies in a manner inconsistent with the guidelines of
the Policies or the recommendation of the Agent, the personnel will consult with members of senior
management of the investment adviser to determine if a material conflict of interests exists. If
it is determined that a material conflict does exist, the investment adviser will seek instruction
on how to vote from the Special Committee.
Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent
12 month period ended June 30 is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling
1-800-262-1122, and (2) on the Securities and Exchange
Commissions website at http://www.sec.gov.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated
Purchasers
No such purchases this period.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No Material Changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrants principal executive officer and principal
financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrants current disclosure controls and
procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the
date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by
the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period
specified in the Commissions rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by
the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrants principal executive
officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting
during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
|
|
|
(a)(1)
|
|
Registrants Code of Ethics Not applicable (please see Item 2). |
|
|
|
(a)(2)(i)
|
|
Treasurers Section 302 certification. |
|
|
|
(a)(2)(ii)
|
|
Presidents Section 302 certification. |
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Combined Section 906 certification. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson
|
|
|
|
Cynthia J. Clemson |
|
|
|
President |
|
|
Date: November 8, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act
of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Barbara E. Campbell
|
|
|
|
Barbara E. Campbell |
|
|
|
Treasurer |
|
|
Date: November 8, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson
|
|
|
|
Cynthia J. Clemson |
|
|
|
President |
|
|
Date: November 8, 2011