UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 12, 2007

BearingPoint, Inc.

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)		001-31451 (Commission File Number)		22-3680505 (IRS Employer Identification No.)

1676 International Drive
McLean, VA 22102
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (703) 747-3000

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

o		Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o		Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o		Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o		Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 

 

Item 8.01 Other Events

     On September 12, 2007, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed with prejudice In Re BearingPoint, Inc. Securities Litigation II (Civil Action No. 1:05-cv-454), granting motions to dismiss filed by BearingPoint, Inc. (the “Company”) and the other named defendants. As previously disclosed, in and after April 2005, various separate complaints were filed with, and a class certified by, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia with respect to allegations that the Company and other named defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. In granting the Company’s motion to dismiss, the court ruled that the plaintiff failed to meet the scienter pleading requirements set forth in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Plaintiff may seek review of the court’s decision.

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.