e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended:
|
|
Commission file number:
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
000-50890
|
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP,
INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
41-1990662
|
(State of
Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.)
|
|
|
|
7800 Walton Parkway
|
|
43054
|
New Albany, Ohio
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(614) 289-5360
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
|
The Nasdaq Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Schedule 15(d) of
the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
Company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price
at which the common equity was last sold on June 30, 2007,
was $405,328,271.
As of February 29, 2008, 22,054,372 shares of Common
Stock of the Registrant were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of
Part III of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are incorporated by reference from the Registrants Proxy
Statement for its annual meeting to be held May 20, 2008
(the 2008 Proxy Statement).
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC.
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
Table of Contents
i
CERTAIN
DEFINITIONS
All references in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
to the Company, Commercial Vehicle
Group, CVG, we, us,
and our refer to Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries (unless the context otherwise
requires).
FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that
are not statements of historical fact, including without
limitation, certain statements under Item 1
Business and Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations and located elsewhere herein
regarding industry prospects and our results of operations or
financial position, may be deemed to be forward-looking
statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words
believes, anticipates,
plans, expects, and similar expressions
are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The
important factors discussed in Item 1A
Risk Factors, among others, could cause actual results to
differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking
statements made herein and presented elsewhere by management
from time to time. Such forward-looking statements represent
managements current expectations and are inherently
uncertain. Investors are warned that actual results may differ
from managements expectations. Additionally, various
economic and competitive factors could cause actual results to
differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking
statements, including, but not limited to, factors which are
outside our control, such as risks relating to (i) our
ability to develop or successfully introduce new products;
(ii) risks associated with conducting business in foreign
countries and currencies; (iii) general economic or
business conditions affecting the markets in which we serve;
(iv) increased competition in the heavy-duty truck or
construction market; and (v) our failure to complete or
successfully integrate additional strategic acquisitions. All
subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly
qualified in their entirety by such cautionary statements.
ii
PART I
Overview
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (a Delaware corporation formed in
August 2002) and its subsidiaries, is a leading supplier of
fully integrated system solutions for the global commercial
vehicle market, including the heavy-duty truck market, the
construction and agriculture markets and the specialty and
military transportation markets. Our products include static and
suspension seat systems, interior trim systems (including
instrument panels, door panels, headliners, cabinetry and floor
systems), cab structures and components, mirrors, wiper systems,
electronic wire harness assemblies and controls and switches
specifically designed for applications in commercial vehicles.
We are differentiated from suppliers to the automotive industry
by our ability to manufacture low volume customized products on
a sequenced basis to meet the requirements of our customers. We
believe that we have the number one or two position in most of
our major markets and that we are the only supplier in the North
American commercial vehicle market that can offer complete cab
systems including cab body assemblies, sleeper boxes, seats,
interior trim, flooring, wire harnesses, panel assemblies and
other structural components. We believe our products are used by
virtually every major North American commercial vehicle original
equipment manufacturer (OEM), which we believe
creates an opportunity to cross-sell our products and offer a
fully integrated system solution.
Demand for our products is generally dependent on the number of
new commercial vehicles manufactured, which in turn is a
function of general economic conditions, interest rates, changes
in governmental regulations, consumer spending, fuel costs and
our customers inventory levels and production rates.
New commercial vehicle demand in the North American Class 8
truck market has historically been cyclical and is particularly
sensitive to the industrial sector of the economy, which
generates a significant portion of the freight tonnage hauled by
commercial vehicles. Production of Class 8 heavy trucks in
North America initially peaked in 1999 and experienced a
downturn from 2000 to 2003 that was due to a weak economy, an
oversupply of new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending
on commercial vehicles and equipment. Demand for commercial
vehicles improved from 2004 to 2006 due to broad economic
recovery in North America, corresponding growth in the movement
of goods, the growing need to replace aging truck fleets and
OEMs receiving larger than expected pre-orders in anticipation
of the new EPA emissions standards becoming effective in 2007.
During 2007, the demand for North American Class 8 heavy
trucks experienced a downturn as a result of pre-orders in 2006
and general weakness in the North American economy and
corresponding decline in the need for commercial vehicles to
haul freight tonnage in North America.
New commercial vehicle demand in the global construction
equipment market generally follows certain economic conditions
around the world. Within the construction market, there are two
classes of construction equipment, the medium/heavy equipment
market (weighing over 12 metric tons) and the light construction
equipment market (weighing below 12 metric tons). Demand in the
medium/heavy construction equipment market is typically related
to the level of larger scale infrastructure development projects
such as highways, dams, harbors, hospitals, airports and
industrial development as well as activity in the mining,
forestry and other raw material based industries. Demand in the
light construction equipment market is typically related to
certain economic conditions such as the level of housing
construction and other smaller-scale developments and projects.
Our products are primarily used in the medium/heavy construction
equipment markets.
Recent
Acquisitions
In October 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock
of PEKM Kabeltechnik s.r.o. (PEKM), an electronic
wire harness manufacturer primarily for the commercial truck
market, with facilities in the Czech Republic and the Ukraine.
In October 2007, we acquired the heavy-gauge thermoforming and
injection molding assets of the Fabrication Division of Gage
Industries, Inc. (Gage).
1
In December 2007, we acquired substantially all of the assets of
Short Bark Industries, LLC (SBI), a supplier of seat
covers and various
cut-and-sew
trim products.
See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements
contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for detailed information on these transactions.
Industry
Within the commercial vehicle industry, we sell our products
primarily to the North American heavy truck OEM market
(approximately 41% of our 2007 revenues), the global
construction OEM market (approximately 26% of our 2007 revenues)
and the aftermarket and OEM service organizations (approximately
13% of our 2007 revenues). The majority of our remaining 20% of
2007 revenues was derived primarily from other global commercial
vehicle and specialty markets.
Commercial
Vehicle Supply Market Overview
Commercial vehicles are used in a wide variety of end markets,
including local and long-haul commercial trucking, bus,
construction, mining, general industrial, marine, municipal and
recreation. The commercial vehicle supply industry can generally
be separated into two categories: (1) sales to OEMs, in
which products are sold in relatively large quantities directly
for use by OEMs in new commercial vehicles; and
(2) aftermarket sales, in which products are
sold as replacements in varying quantities to a wide range of
OEM service organizations, wholesalers, retailers and
installers. In the OEM market, suppliers are generally divided
into tiers Tier 1 suppliers (like
our company), who provide their products directly to OEMs, and
Tier 2 or Tier 3 suppliers,
who sell their products principally to other suppliers for
integration into those suppliers own product offerings.
Our largest end market, the commercial truck and construction
industry, is supplied by heavy- and medium-duty commercial
vehicle suppliers as well as automotive suppliers. The
commercial vehicle supplier industry is highly fragmented and
comprised of several large companies and many smaller companies.
In addition, the commercial vehicle supplier industry is
characterized by relatively low production volumes as well as
considerable barriers to entry, including the following:
(1) significant investment requirements, (2) stringent
technical and manufacturing requirements, (3) high
transition costs to shift production to new suppliers,
(4) just-in-time
delivery requirements and (5) strong brand name
recognition. Foreign competition is limited in the commercial
vehicle market due to many factors, including the need to be
responsive to order changes on short notice, high shipping
costs, customer concerns about quality given the safety aspect
of many of our products and service requirements.
Although OEM demand for our products is directly correlated with
new vehicle production, suppliers like us can also grow by
increasing their product content per vehicle through cross
selling and bundling of products, further penetrating business
with existing customers, gaining new customers and expanding
into new geographic markets and by increasing aftermarket sales.
We believe that companies with a global presence and advanced
technology, engineering, manufacturing and support capabilities,
such as our company, are well positioned to take advantage of
these opportunities.
North
American Commercial Truck Market
Purchasers of commercial trucks include fleet operators, owner
operators and other industrial end users. Commercial vehicles
used for local and long-haul commercial trucking are generally
classified by gross vehicle weight. Class 8 vehicles are
trucks with gross vehicle weight in excess of 33,000 lbs. and
Class 5 through 7 vehicles are trucks with gross vehicle
weight from 16,001 lbs. to 33,000 lbs. The following table shows
commercial vehicle production levels for 2001 through 2007 in
North America:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Thousands of units)
|
|
|
Class 8 heavy trucks
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
Class 5-7
light and medium-duty trucks
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: ACT Publications, The Commercial Truck, Bus and Trailer
Industry OUTLOOK (February 2008).
2
The following describes the major segments of the commercial
vehicle market in which we compete:
Class 8
Truck Market
The global Class 8 truck manufacturing market is
concentrated in three primary regions: North America,
Asia-Pacific and Europe. The global Class 8 truck market is
localized in nature due to the following factors: (1) the
prohibitive costs of shipping components from one region to
another, (2) the high degree of customization of
Class 8 trucks to meet the region-specific demands of end
users, and (3) the ability to meet
just-in-time
delivery requirements. According to ACT, four companies
represented approximately 96% of North American Class 8
truck production in 2007. The percentages of Class 8
production represented by Freightliner, PACCAR, International
and Volvo/Mack were approximately 34%, 27%, 19% and 16%,
respectively. We supply products to all of these OEMs.
Production of commercial vehicles in North America initially
peaked in 1999 and experienced a downturn from 2000 to 2003 that
was due to a weak economy, reduced sales following above-normal
purchases in advance of new EPA emissions standards that became
effective in October 2002, an oversupply of new and used vehicle
inventory and lower spending on commercial vehicles and
equipment. Following a substantial decline from 1999 to 2001,
Class 8 truck unit production increased modestly to
approximately 181,000 units in 2002 from approximately
146,000 units in 2001, due primarily to the purchasing of
trucks that occurred prior to the October 2002 mandate for more
stringent engine emissions requirements. Subsequent to the
engine emissions requirements, truck production continued to
remain at historically low levels through mid-2003 due to
continuing economic weakness and the reluctance of many trucking
companies to invest during this period.
In mid-2003, evidence of renewed growth emerged and truck
tonmiles (number of miles driven multiplied by number of tons
transported) began to increase, along with new truck sales.
During the second half of 2003, new truck dealer inventories
declined and, consequently, OEM truck order backlogs began to
increase. According to ACT, monthly truck order rates began
increasing significantly from December 2003 through 2005. In
2006, OEMs received larger than expected pre-orders in
anticipation of the new EPA emissions standards becoming
effective in 2007. During 2007, the demand for North American
Class 8 heavy trucks experienced a downturn as a result of
2006 pre-orders, a general weakness in the North American
economy and corresponding decline in the need for commercial
vehicles to haul freight tonnage in North America.
The following table illustrates North American Class 8
truck build for the years 1998 to 2012:
North
American Class 8 Truck Build Rates
(In thousands)
E Estimated
Source: ACT Publications, Five Year Forecast (February 2008).
3
According to ACT, unit production for 2008 is estimated to
increase approximately 5.7% from 2007 levels to approximately
224,000 units. We believe that the decrease from 2006 to
2007 was impacted by the more stringent EPA emissions standards
becoming effective in early 2007 as well as a general weakness
in the North American economy and corresponding decline in the
need for commercial vehicles to haul freight tonnage in North
America.
We believe the following factors are currently driving the North
American Class 8 truck market:
Economic Conditions. The North American truck
industry is directly influenced by overall economic growth and
consumer spending. Since truck OEMs supply the fleet lines of
North America, their production levels generally match the
demand for freight. The freight carried by these trucks includes
consumer goods, machinery, food and beverages, construction
equipment and supplies, electronic equipment and a wide variety
of other materials. Since most of these items are driven by
macroeconomic conditions, the truck industry tends to follow
trends of gross domestic product (GDP). Generally,
given the dependence of North American shippers on trucking as a
freight alternative, general economic conditions have been a
primary indicator of future truck builds.
Truck Freight Growth. ACT projects that total
domestic truck freight will continue to increase over the next
five years, driven by growth in GDP. In addition, national
suppliers and distribution centers, burdened by the pricing
pressure of large manufacturing and retail customers, have
continued to reduce
on-site
inventory levels. This reduction requires freight handlers to
provide to-the-hour delivery options. As a result,
Class 8 trucks have replaced manufacturing warehouses as
the preferred temporary storage facility for inventory. Since
trucks are typically viewed as the most reliable and flexible
shipping alternative, truck tonmiles, as well as truck platform
improvements, should continue to increase in order to meet the
increasing need for flexibility under a
just-in-time
system. ACT forecasts that total U.S. Class 8 truck
tonmiles will increase from 3.7 million in 2007 to
4.0 million in 2012, as summarized in the following graph:
Total
U.S. Tonmiles (Class 8)
(Number of tonmiles in millions)
E Estimated
Source: ACT Publications, Five Year Forecast (February 2008).
Truck Replacement Cycle and Fleet Aging. Since
1998, the average age of active Class 8 trucks has
increased from approximately 5.5 years in 1998 to
approximately 6.0 years in 2007. The average fleet age
tends to run in cycles as freight companies permit their truck
fleets to age during periods of lagging demand and then
replenish those fleets during periods of increasing demand.
Additionally, as truck fleets age, their maintenance costs
typically increase. Freight companies must therefore continually
evaluate the economics between repair and replacement. Other
factors, such as inventory management and the growth in
less-than-truckload freight shipping, also tend to
4
increase fleet mileage and, as a result, the truck replacement
cycle. The chart below illustrates the average age of active
U.S. Class 8 trucks:
Average
Age of Active U.S. Class 8 Trucks
(Number of years)
E Estimated
Source: ACT Research (2008).
Commercial
Truck Aftermarket
Demand for aftermarket products tends to be counter cyclical to
OEM demand because vehicle owners are more likely to repair
vehicles than purchase new ones during recessionary periods.
Therefore, aftermarket demand moderately increases during such
periods. Demand for aftermarket products is driven by the
quality of OEM parts, the number of vehicles in operation, the
average age of the vehicle fleet, vehicle usage, the average
useful life of vehicle parts and total truck tonmiles. The
aftermarket is a growing market, as the overall size of the
North American fleet of Class 8 trucks has continued to
increase and is attractive because of the recurring nature of
the sales. Additionally, aftermarket sales tend to be at a
higher margin, as truck component suppliers are able to leverage
their already established fixed cost base and exert moderate
pricing power with their replacement parts. The recurring nature
of aftermarket revenue provides some insulation to the overall
cyclical nature of the industry, as it tends to provide a more
stable stream of revenues.
Commercial
Construction Vehicle Market
New commercial vehicle demand in the global construction
equipment market generally follows certain economic conditions
around the world. Within the construction market, there are two
classes of construction equipment: the medium/heavy equipment
market (weighing over 12 metric tons) and the light construction
equipment market (weighing below 12 metric tons). Demand in the
medium/heavy construction equipment market is typically related
to the level of larger scale infrastructure development projects
such as highways, dams, harbors, hospitals, airports and
industrial development as well as activity in the mining,
forestry and other raw material based industries. Demand in the
light construction equipment market is typically related to
certain economic conditions such as the level of housing
construction and other smaller-scale developments and projects.
Our products are primarily used in the medium/heavy construction
equipment markets.
Purchasers of medium/heavy construction equipment include
construction companies, municipalities, local governments,
rental fleet owners, quarrying and mining companies and forestry
related industries. Purchasers of light construction equipment
include contractors, rental fleet owners, landscapers, logistics
companies and farmers.
5
Military
Equipment Market
We supply products for heavy- and medium-payload tactical trucks
that are used by various military customers. Sales and
production of these vehicles can be influenced by overall
defense spending both by the U.S. government and foreign
governments and the presence of military conflicts and potential
military conflicts throughout the world. Demand for these
vehicles is expected to increase as the result of the continuing
conflict in the Middle East. In addition, demand has increased
for remanufacturing and replacement of the large fleet of
vehicles that have served in the Middle East due to over-use and
new armor and technology requirements.
Commercial
Vehicle Industry Trends
Our performance and growth are directly related to trends in the
commercial vehicle market that are focused on driver retention,
comfort and safety. These commercial vehicle industry trends
include the following:
System Sourcing. Commercial vehicle OEMs are
seeking suppliers capable of providing fully-engineered,
complete systems rather than suppliers who produce the separate
parts that comprise a system. By outsourcing complete systems,
OEMs are able to reduce the costs associated with the design and
integration of different components and improve quality by
requiring their suppliers to assemble and test major portions of
the vehicle prior to beginning production. In addition, OEMs are
able to develop more efficient assembly processes when complete
systems are delivered in sequence rather than as individual
parts or components.
Globalization of Suppliers. To serve multiple
markets more cost effectively, commercial vehicle OEMs are
beginning to standardize global vehicle platforms to be
manufactured and sold in various geographic markets around the
world. Having operations in the geographic markets in which OEMs
produce their global platforms enables suppliers to meet
OEMs needs more economically and more efficiently.
Shift of Design and Engineering to
Suppliers. OEMs are focusing their efforts on
brand development and overall vehicle design, instead of the
design of individual vehicle systems. OEMs are increasingly
looking to their suppliers to provide suggestions for new
products, designs, engineering developments and manufacturing
processes. As a result, strategic suppliers are gaining
increased access to confidential planning information regarding
OEMs future vehicle designs and manufacturing processes.
Systems and modules increase the importance of strategic
suppliers because they generally increase the percentage of
vehicle content.
Broad Manufacturing Capabilities. With respect
to commercial vehicle interiors, OEMs are requiring their
suppliers to manufacture interior systems and products utilizing
alternative materials and processes in order to meet OEMs
demand for customized styling or cost requirements. In addition,
while OEMs seek to differentiate their vehicles through the
introduction of innovative interior features, suppliers are
proactively developing new interior products with enhanced
features.
Ongoing Supplier Consolidation. We believe the
worldwide commercial vehicle supply industry is continuing to
consolidate as suppliers seek to achieve operating synergies
through business combinations, shift production to locations
with more flexible work rules and practices, acquire
complementary technologies, build stronger customer
relationships and follow their OEM customers as they expand
globally. Suppliers need to provide OEMs with single-point
sourcing of integrated systems and modules on a global basis,
and this is expected to drive further industry consolidation.
Furthermore, the cost focus of most major OEMs has forced
suppliers to reduce costs and improve productivity on an ongoing
basis, including economies of scale through consolidation.
Competitive
Strengths
We believe that our competitive strengths include, but are not
limited to, the following:
Leading Market Positions and Brands. We
believe that we are the leading supplier of seating systems and
soft interior trim products, the only non-captive manufacturer
of Class 8 truck body systems (which includes cab body
assemblies) for the North American commercial vehicle
heavy-truck market and one of the largest global suppliers of
construction vehicle seating systems. Our products are marketed
under brand names that are well known by our customers and truck
fleet operators based upon the amount of revenue we derive from
sales to these
6
markets. These brands include KAB Seating, National Seating,
Trim Systems, Sprague Controls, Sprague
Devices®,
Prutsmantm,
Moto
Mirror®,
RoadWatch®,
and
Mayflower®.
Comprehensive Cab Product and Cab System
Solutions. We believe that we offer the broadest
product range of any commercial vehicle cab supplier. We
manufacture a broad base of products, many of which are critical
to the interior and exterior subsystems of a commercial vehicle
cab. We believe we are the only supplier worldwide with the
capability to manufacture and offer complete cab systems in
sequence, integrating interior trim and seats with the cab
structure and the electronic wire harness and instrument panel
assemblies. We also utilize a variety of different processes,
such as urethane molding, injection molding, Virtual Engineered
Composites (VEC) large composite molding,
thermoforming and twin-sheet vacuum forming that
enable us to meet each customers unique styling and cost
requirements. The breadth of our product offering enables us to
provide a one-stop shop for our customers, who
increasingly require complete cab solutions from a single supply
source. As a result, we believe that we have a substantial
opportunity for further customer penetration through
cross-selling initiatives and by bundling our products to
provide complete system solutions.
End-User Focused Product Innovation. We
believe that commercial vehicle market OEMs continue to focus on
interior and exterior product design, comfort and features to
better serve their end user, the driver, and our customers are
seeking suppliers that can provide product innovation. We have a
full service engineering and product development organization to
assist OEMs in meeting their needs which helps enable us to
secure content on current platforms and models.
Flexible Manufacturing Capabilities and Cost Competitive
Position. Because commercial vehicle OEMs permit
their customers to select from an extensive menu of cab options,
our customers frequently request modified products in low
volumes within a limited time frame. We have a highly variable
cost structure and can efficiently leverage our flexible
manufacturing capabilities to provide low volume, customized
products to meet each customers styling, cost and
just-in-time
delivery requirements. We manufacture or assemble our products
at facilities in North America, Europe, China and Australia.
Several of our facilities are located near our customers to
reduce distribution costs and to maintain a high level of
customer service and flexibility.
Global Capabilities. Because many of our
customers manufacture and sell their products on a global basis,
we believe we have a strong competitive advantage by having
dedicated sales, engineering, manufacturing and assembly
capabilities on a global basis. We have these capabilities to
support our customers in North America, Europe, China and
Australia.
Strong Free Cash Flow Generation. Our business
generates strong free cash flow, as it benefits from modest
capital expenditure and working capital requirements. Over the
three years ended December 31, 2007, our consolidated
capital expenditures averaged $20.1 million per year, which
amounts to approximately 2.5% of consolidated net revenues.
Strong Relationships with Leading Customers and Major
Fleets. Because of our comprehensive product
offerings, brand names and innovative product features, we
believe we are an important long-term global supplier to many of
the leading heavy-truck, construction and specialty commercial
vehicle manufacturers such as Paccar, International,
Caterpillar, Freightliner, Volvo/Mack., Oshkosh Truck, Komatsu
and Deere & Co. In addition, through our sales force
and engineering teams, we maintain active relationships with the
major heavy-duty truck fleet organizations that are end users of
our products such as Yellow Roadway Corp., Swift Transportation,
Schneider National and Ryder Leasing. As a result of our
high-quality, innovative products, well-recognized brand names
and customer service, a majority of the largest 100 fleet
operators specifically request certain of our products.
Significant Barriers to Entry. We believe we
are a leader in providing critical cab assemblies and components
to long running platforms. Considerable barriers to entry exist,
including significant investment and engineering requirements,
stringent technical and manufacturing requirements, high
transition costs for OEMs to shift production to new suppliers,
just-in-time
delivery requirements and strong brand name recognition.
Proven Management Team. Our management team is
highly respected within the commercial vehicle market, and our
six senior executive officers have a combined average of
28 years of experience in the industry. We believe that our
team has substantial depth in critical operational areas and has
demonstrated success in reducing costs, integrating business
acquisitions and improving processes through cyclical periods.
7
Strategy
Our primary growth strategies are as follows:
Increase Content, Expand Customer Penetration and Leverage
System Opportunities. We believe we are the only
integrated commercial vehicle supplier that can offer complete
interior cab systems. We are focused on securing additional
sales from our existing customer base, and we actively
cross-market a diverse portfolio of products to our customers to
increase our content on the cabs manufactured by these OEMs. To
complement our North American capabilities and enhance our
customer relationships, we are working with OEMs as they
increase their focus on international markets. We have
established operations in Europe and Asia and are aggressively
working to secure new business from both existing and new
customers. We believe we are well positioned to capitalize on
the migration toward commercial vehicle suppliers that can offer
a complete cab systems, solutions and components.
Leverage Our New Product Development
Capabilities. We have made a significant
investment in our engineering capabilities and new product
development in order to anticipate the evolving demands of our
customers and end users. For example, we recently launched a new
integrated sleeper cab with one of our largest customers
utilizing a highly automated robotic assembly system. Products
for this program include all major Class A exterior
stampings, roof assembly and full body
E-coat. In
addition, we recently developed and launched key products for a
new military specialty vehicle platform including driver,
co-driver and passenger seating as well as interior headliners
and windshield wiper systems. We will continue to design and
develop new products that add or improve content and increase
cab comfort and safety.
Capitalize on Operating Leverage. We
continuously seek ways to lower costs, enhance product quality,
improve manufacturing efficiencies and increase product
throughput and we continue to implement our Lean Manufacturing
and Total Quality Production Systems (TQPS)
programs. We believe our ongoing cost saving initiatives and
sourcing efforts in Europe and Asia will enable us to continue
to lower our manufacturing costs. As a result, we believe we are
well positioned to improve our operating margins and capitalize
on any volume increases with minimal additional capital
expenditures.
Grow Sales to the Aftermarket. While
commercial vehicles have a relatively long life, certain
components, such as seats, wipers and mirrors, are replaced more
frequently. We believe that there are opportunities to leverage
our brand recognition to increase our sales to the replacement
aftermarket. Since many aftermarket participants are small and
locally focused, we plan to leverage our national presence to
increase our market share in the fragmented aftermarket. We
believe that the continued growth in the aftermarket represents
an attractive opportunity to diversify our business due to its
relative stability as well as the market penetration opportunity.
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions and Continue to Diversify
Revenues. We will selectively pursue
complementary strategic acquisitions that allow us to leverage
the marketing, engineering and manufacturing strengths of our
business and expand our revenues to new and existing customers.
The markets in which we operate are fragmented and provide for
consolidation opportunities. Our acquisitions have enabled us to
become a global supplier with the capability to offer complete
cab systems in sequence, integrating interior trim and seats
with the cab structure, to provide integrated electronic systems
into our cab products and to expand the breadth of our interior
systems capabilities. In addition, these acquisitions have
allowed us to diversify our revenue base by customer, market,
location or product offering.
Products
We offer OEMs a broad range of products and system solutions for
a variety of end market vehicle applications that include local
and long-haul commercial truck, construction, bus, agricultural,
military, end market industrial, marine, municipal, recreation
and specialty vehicle. We believe fleets and OEMs continue to
focus on cabs and interiors to differentiate their products and
improve driver comfort and retention. Although a portion of our
products are sold directly to OEMs as finished components, we
use most of our products to produce systems or
subsystems, which are groups of component parts
located throughout the vehicle that operate together to provide
a specific vehicle function. Systems currently produced by us
include cab bodies, sleeper boxes, seating, trim, body panels,
storage cabinets, floor covering, mirrors, windshield wipers,
headliners, window lifts, door locks,
8
temperature measurement and wire harnesses. We classify our
products into five general categories: (1) seats and
seating systems, (2) trim systems and components,
(3) mirrors, wipers and controls, (4) cab structures,
sleeper boxes, body panels and structural components and
(5) electronic wire harnesses and panel assemblies.
See Notes 2 and 10 to our consolidated financial statements
in Item 8 in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for information on our significant customer revenues and related
receivables, as well as revenues by product category and
geographical location.
Set forth below is a brief description of our products and their
applications:
Seats and Seating Systems. We design,
engineer and produce seating systems primarily for heavy trucks
in North America and for commercial vehicles used in the
construction and agricultural industries through our European
and Asian operations. For the most part, our seats and seating
systems are fully-assembled and ready for installation when they
are delivered to the OEM. We offer a wide range of seats that
include air suspension seats, static seats and bus seats. As a
result of our strong product design and product technology, we
are a leader in designing seats with convenience features and
enhanced safety. Seats and seating systems are the most complex
and highly specialized products of our five product categories.
Heavy Truck Seats. We produce seats and
seating systems for heavy trucks in our North American
operations. Our heavy truck seating systems are designed to
achieve maximum driver comfort by adding a wide range of manual
and power features such as lumbar supports, cushion and back
bolsters and leg and thigh supports. Our heavy truck seats are
highly specialized based on a variety of different seating
options offered in OEM product lines. Our seats are built to
customer specifications in low volumes and consequently are
produced in numerous combinations with a wide range of price
points.
We differentiate our seats from our competitors seats by
focusing on three principal goals: driver comfort, driver
retention and decreased workers compensation claims.
Drivers of heavy trucks recognize and are often given the
opportunity to specify their choice of seat brands, and we
strive to develop strong customer loyalty both with the
commercial vehicle OEMs and among drivers. We believe that we
have superior technology and can offer a unique seat base that
is ergonomically designed, accommodates a range of driver sizes
and absorbs shock to maximize driver comfort.
Construction and Other Commercial Vehicle
Seats. We produce seats and seating systems for
commercial vehicles used in the global construction and
agricultural, bus, military, commercial transport and municipal
industries. The principal focus of these seating systems is
durability. These seats are ergonomically designed for difficult
working environments, to provide comfort and control throughout
the range of seats and chairs.
Other Seating Products. We also manufacture
office seating products. Our office chair was developed as a
result of our experience supplying chairs for the heavy truck,
agricultural and construction industries and is fully adjustable
to maximize comfort at work. Our office chairs are available in
a wide variety of colors and fabrics to suit many different
office environments, such as emergency services, call centers,
receptions, studios, boardrooms and general office.
Trim Systems and Components. We design,
engineer and produce trim systems and components for the
interior cabs of commercial vehicles. Our interior trim products
are designed to provide a comfortable interior for the vehicle
occupants as well as a variety of functional and safety
features. The wide variety of features that can be selected by
the heavy truck customer makes trim systems and components a
complex and highly specialized product category. Set forth below
is a brief description of our principal trim systems and
components:
Trim Products. Our trim products include
A-Pillars, B-Pillars, door panels and interior trim panels. Door
panels and interior trim panels consist of several component
parts that are attached to a substrate. Specific components
include vinyl or cloth-covered appliqués, armrests, map
pocket compartments, carpet and sound-reducing insulation. Our
products are attractive, lightweight solutions from a
traditional cut and sew approach to a contemporary
molded styling theme. The parts can be color matched
or top good wrapped to integrate seamlessly with the rest of the
interior.
9
Instrument Panels. We produce and assemble
instrument panels that can be integrated with the rest of the
interior trim. The instrument panel is a complex system of
coverings and foam, plastic and metal parts designed to house
various components and act as a safety device for the vehicle
occupant.
Body Panels (Headliners/Wall
Panels). Headliners consist of a substrate and a
finished interior layer made of fabrics and materials. While
headliners are an important contributor to interior aesthetics,
they also provide insulation from road noise and can serve as
carriers for a variety of other components, such as visors,
overhead consoles, grab handles, coat hooks, electrical wiring,
speakers, lighting and other electronic and electrical products.
As the amount of electronic and electrical content available in
vehicles has increased, headliners have emerged as an important
carrier of electronic features such as lighting systems.
Storage Systems. Our modular storage units and
custom cabinetry are designed to improve comfort and convenience
for the driver. These storage systems are designed to be
integrated with the interior trim. These units may be easily
expanded and customized with features that include
refrigerators, sinks and water reservoirs. Our storage systems
are constructed with durable materials and designed to last the
life of the vehicle.
Floor Covering Systems. We have an extensive
and comprehensive portfolio of floor covering systems and dash
insulators. Carpet flooring systems generally consist of tufted
or non-woven carpet with a thermoplastic backcoating which, when
heated, allows the carpet to be fitted precisely to the interior
or trunk compartment of the vehicle. Additional insulation
materials are added to minimize noise, vibration and harshness.
Non-carpeted flooring systems, used primarily in commercial and
fleet vehicles, offer improved wear and maintenance
characteristics. The dash insulator separates the passenger
compartment from the engine compartment and prevents engine
noise and heat from entering the passenger compartment.
Sleeper Bunks. We offer a wide array of design
choices for upper and lower sleeper bunks for heavy trucks. All
parts of our sleeper bunks can be integrated to match the rest
of the interior trim. Our sleeper bunks arrive at OEMs fully
assembled and ready for installation.
Grab Handles and Armrests. Our grab handles
and armrests are designed and engineered with specific attention
to aesthetics, ergonomics and strength. Our products use a wide
range of inserts and substrates for structural integrity. The
integral urethane skin offers a soft touch and can be in-mold
coated to specific colors.
Privacy Curtains. We produce privacy curtains
for use in sleeper cabs. Our privacy curtains include features
such as integrated color matching of both sides of the curtain,
choice of cloth or vinyl, full black out features
and low-weight.
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls. We
design, engineer and produce a wide range of mirrors, wipers and
controls used in commercial vehicles. Set forth below is a brief
description of our principal products in this category:
Mirrors. We offer a wide range of round,
rectangular, motorized and heated mirrors and related hardware,
including brackets, braces and side bars. Most of our mirror
designs utilize stainless steel body, fasteners and support
braces to ensure durability. We have introduced both road and
outside temperature devices that are integrated into the mirror
face or the vehicles dashboard through our
RoadWatchtm
family of products. These systems are principally utilized by
municipalities throughout North America to monitor surface
temperatures and assist them in dispersing chemicals for snow
and ice removal.
Windshield Wiper Systems. We offer
application-specific windshield wiper systems and individual
windshield wiper components for all segments of the commercial
vehicle market. Our windshield wiper systems are generally
delivered to the OEM fully assembled and ready for installation.
A windshield wiper system is typically comprised of an electric
motor, linkages, arms, wiper blades, washer reservoirs and
related pneumatic or electric pumps. We also supply air-assisted
washing systems for headlights and cameras to assist drivers
with visibility for safe vehicle operation. These systems
utilize window wash fluid and air to create a turbulent
liquid/air stream that removes road grime from headlights and
cameras. We offer an optional programmable washing system that
allows for periodic washing and dry cycles for maximum safety.
Controls. We offer a range of controls and
control systems that includes a complete line of window lifts
and door locks, mechanic, pneumatic, electrical and electronic
HVAC controls and electric switch products. We
10
specialize in air-powered window lifts and door locks, which are
highly reliable and cost effective as compared to similar
electrical products.
Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
Components. We design, engineer and produce
complete cab structures, sleeper boxes, body panels and
structural components for the commercial vehicle industry in
North America. Set forth below is a description of our principal
products in this category:
Cab Structures. We design, manufacture and
assemble complete cab structures used primarily in heavy trucks
for the major commercial vehicle OEMs in North America. Our cab
structures, which are manufactured from both steel and aluminum,
are delivered to our customers fully assembled and primed for
paint. Our cab structures are built to order based upon options
selected by the vehicles end-users and delivered to the
OEMs, in line sequence, as these end-users trucks are
manufactured by the OEMs.
Sleeper Boxes. We design, manufacture and
assemble sleeper boxes primarily for heavy trucks in North
America. We manufacture both integrated sleeper boxes that are
part of the overall cab structure as well as stand alone
assemblies depending on the customer application. Sleeper boxes
are typically constructed using aluminum exterior panels in
combination with steel structural components delivered to our
customers in line sequence after the final seal and
E-coat
process.
Bumper Fascias, Fender Covers and Fender
Liners. Our highly durable, lightweight bumper
fascias and fender covers and liners are capable of withstanding
repeated impacts that could deform an aluminum or steel bumper.
We utilize a production technique that chemically bonds a layer
of paint to the part after it has been molded, thereby enabling
the part to keep its appearance even after repeated impacts.
Body Panels and Structural Components. We
produce a wide range of both steel and aluminum large exterior
body panels and structural components for the internal
production of our cab structures and sleeper boxes as well as
being sold externally to certain commercial vehicle OEMs. In
addition, we also manufacture composite body panels utilizing
our virtual engineered composite (VEC) technology.
Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel
Assemblies. We produce a wide range of
electronic wire harnesses and related assemblies as well as
panel assemblies used in commercial vehicles and other
equipment. Set forth below is a brief description of our
principal products in this category.
Electronic Wire Harnesses. We offer a broad
range of complex electronic wire harness assemblies that
function as the primary current carrying devices used to provide
electrical interconnections for gauges, lights, control
functions, power circuits and other electronic applications on a
commercial vehicle. Our wire harnesses are highly customized to
fit specific end-user requirements. We provide our wire
harnesses for a wide variety of commercial vehicles, military
vehicles, specialty trucks, automotive and other specialty
applications, including heavy-industrial equipment.
Panel Assemblies. We assemble large,
integrated components such as panel assemblies and cabinets for
commercial vehicle OEMs and other heavy equipment manufacturers.
The panels and cabinets we assemble are installed in key
locations on a vehicle or unit of equipment, are integrated with
our wire harness assemblies and provide user control over
certain operational functions and features.
Manufacturing
A description of the manufacturing processes we utilize for each
of our principal product categories is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Seats and Seating Systems. Our seating
operations utilize a variety of manufacturing techniques whereby
foam and various other components along with fabric, vinyl or
leather are affixed to an underlying seat frame. We also
manufacture and assemble the seat frame, which involves complex
welding. Generally, we utilize outside suppliers to produce the
individual components used to assemble the seat frame.
|
|
|
|
Trim Systems and Components. Our interior
systems process capabilities include injection molding,
low-pressure injection molding, urethane molding and foaming
processes, compression molding, heavy-gauge thermoforming and
vacuum forming as well as various cutting, sewing, trimming and
finishing methods.
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls. We manufacture
our mirrors, wipers and controls utilizing a variety of
manufacturing processes and techniques. Our mirrors, wipers and
controls are primarily hand assembled, tested and packaged.
|
|
|
|
Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
Components. We utilize a wide range of manufacturing
processes to produce the majority of the steel and aluminum
stampings used in our cab structures, sleeper boxes, body panels
and structural components and a variety of both robotic and
manual welding techniques in the assembly of these products. In
addition, both our Norwalk, Ohio and Kings Mountain, North
Carolina facilities have large capacity, fully automated
E-coat paint
priming systems allowing us to provide our customers with a
paint-ready cab product. Due to their high cost, full body
E-coat
systems, such as ours, are rarely found outside of the
manufacturing operations of the major OEMs. The major large
press lines at our Shadyside, Ohio facility provide us with the
in-house manufacturing flexibility for both aluminum and steel
stampings delivered
just-in-time
to our cab assembly plants. This plant also provides us with low
volume forming and processing techniques including laser trim
operations that minimize investment and time to manufacture for
low volume applications.
|
|
|
|
Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel
Assemblies. We utilize several manufacturing
techniques to produce the majority of our electronic wire
harnesses and panel assemblies. Our processes, both manual and
automated, are designed to produce complex, low- to
medium-volume wire harnesses and panel assemblies in short time
frames. Our wire harnesses and panel assemblies are both
electronically and hand tested.
|
We have a broad array of processes to offer our commercial
vehicle OEM customers to enable us to meet their styling and
cost requirements. The vehicle cab is the most significant and
appealing aspect to the driver of the vehicle, and consequently
each commercial vehicle OEM has unique requirements as to feel,
appearance and features.
The end markets for our products are highly specialized and our
customers frequently request modified products in low volumes
within an expedited delivery timeframe. As a result, we
primarily utilize flexible manufacturing cells at the vast
majority of our production facilities. Manufacturing cells are
clusters of individual manufacturing operations and work
stations grouped in a circular configuration, with the operators
placed centrally within the configuration. This provides
flexibility by allowing efficient changes to the number of
operations each operator performs. When compared to the more
traditional, less flexible assembly line process, cell
manufacturing allows us to maintain our product output
consistent with our OEM customers requirements and reduce
the level of inventory.
When an end-user buys a commercial vehicle, the end-user will
specify the seat and other features for that vehicle. Because
each of our seating systems is unique, our manufacturing
facilities have significant complexity which we manage by
building in sequence. We build our seating systems as orders are
received, and systems are delivered to the customers rack
in the sequence in which vehicles come down the assembly line.
We have systems in place that allow us to provide complete
customized interior kits in boxes that are delivered in
sequence, and we intend to expand upon these systems such that
we will be able to provide, in sequence, fully integrated
modular systems combining the cab body and interior and seating
systems.
In many instances, we keep track of our build sequence by
vehicle identification number and components are identified by
bar code. Sequencing reduces our cost of production because it
eliminates warehousing costs and reduces waste and obsolescence,
offsetting any increased labor costs. Several of our
manufacturing facilities are strategically located near our
customers assembly plants, which facilitates this process
and minimizes shipping costs.
We employ
just-in-time
manufacturing and system sourcing in our operations to meet
customer requirements for faster deliveries and to minimize our
need to carry significant inventory levels. We utilize material
systems to manage inventory levels and, in certain locations, we
have inventory delivered as often as two times per day from a
nearby facility based on the previous days order. This
eliminates the need to carry excess inventory at our facilities.
Typically, in a strong economy, new vehicle production increases
and greater funding is available to be spent on enhancements to
the truck interior. As demand goes up, the mix of our products
shifts towards more expensive systems, such as sleeper units,
with enhanced features and higher quality materials. The shift
from low-end units to
12
high-end units amplifies the positive effect a strong economy
has on our business. Conversely, when economic conditions and
indicators decline and customers shift away from ordering
high-end units with enhanced features, our business is adversely
affected from both lower volume and lower pricing. We strive to
manage down cycles by running our facilities at capacity while
maintaining the capability and flexibility to expand. We have
plans to work with our employees and rely on their involvement
to help minimize problems and re-align our capacity during
fluctuating periods of increased or decreased production levels
to achieve on-time delivery.
As a means to enhance our operations, we continue to implement
TQPS throughout our operations. TQPS is our customized version
of Lean Manufacturing and consists of a 32 hour interactive
class that is taught exclusively by members of our management
team. A significant portion of the labor efficiencies we gained
over the past few years is due to the program. TQPS is an
analytical process in which we analyze each of our manufacturing
cells and identify the most efficient process to improve
efficiency and quality. The goal is to achieve total cost
management and continuous improvement. Some examples of
TQPS-related improvements are: reduced labor to move parts
around the facility, clear walking paths in and around
manufacturing cells and increased safety. An ongoing goal is to
reduce the time employees spend waiting for materials within a
facility. In an effort to increase operational efficiency,
improve product quality and provide additional capacity, we
intend to continue to implement TQPS improvements at each of our
manufacturing facilities.
Raw
Materials and Suppliers
A description of the principal raw materials we utilize for each
of our principal product categories is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Seats and Seating Systems. The principal raw
materials used in our seat systems include steel, aluminum and
foam related products and are generally readily available and
obtained from multiple suppliers under various supply
agreements. Leather, vinyl, fabric and certain components are
also purchased from multiple suppliers under supply agreements.
Typically, our supply agreements are for a term of at least one
year and are terminable by us for breach or convenience.
|
|
|
|
Trim Systems and Components. The principal raw
materials used in our interior systems processes are resin and
chemical products, foam, vinyl and fabric which are formed and
assembled into end products. These raw materials are obtained
from multiple suppliers, typically under supply agreements which
are for a term of at least one year and are terminable by us for
breach or convenience.
|
|
|
|
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls. The principal
raw materials used to manufacture our mirrors, wipers and
controls are steel, stainless steel and rubber, which are
generally readily available and obtained from multiple
suppliers. We also purchase sub-assembled products such as
motors for our wiper systems and mirrors.
|
|
|
|
Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
Components. The principal raw materials used in our cab
structures, sleeper boxes, body panels and structural components
are steel and aluminum, the majority of which we purchase in
sheets and stamp at our Shadyside, Ohio facility. These raw
materials are generally readily available and obtained from
several suppliers, typically under purchase contracts which fix
price and supply for up to one year.
|
|
|
|
Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel
Assemblies. The principal raw materials used to
manufacture our electronic wire harnesses are wire, connectors,
terminals, switches, relays and braid fabric. These raw
materials are obtained from multiple suppliers and are generally
readily available.
|
Our supply agreements generally provide for fixed pricing but do
not require us to purchase any specified quantities. We have not
experienced any significant shortages of raw materials and
normally do not carry inventories of raw materials or finished
products in excess of those reasonably required to meet
production and shipping schedules as well as service
requirements. Steel, aluminum, petroleum-based products, copper,
resin, foam, fabrics, wire and wire components account for the
most significant portion of our raw material costs. We typically
purchase steel, copper and petroleum-based products at market
prices, which over the last several years, have increased
significantly. As a result, we are currently being assessed
surcharges and price increases on certain of our purchases of
steel, copper and petroleum-related products. We continue to
work with our customers and
13
suppliers to minimize the impact of such surcharges while
working diligently to minimize the impacts of such increases.
Certain component purchases and suppliers are directed by our
customers. We do not believe we are dependent on a single
supplier or limited group of suppliers for our raw materials.
Customers
and Marketing
We sell our products principally to the commercial vehicle OEM
truck market. Approximately 41% of our 2007 revenues and
approximately 60% of our 2006 revenues were derived from sales
to commercial vehicle truck OEMs, with the remainder of our
revenues being generated principally from sales to the
construction, aftermarket and OEM service markets.
We supply our products primarily to the heavy truck OEM market,
construction market, the aftermarket and OEM service segment and
other commercial vehicle and specialty markets. The following is
a summary of our revenues by end-user market for the three years
ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Heavy Truck OEM
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Aftermarket and OEM Service
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Military
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Bus
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in revenues by end market in 2007 is primarily
related to the decreased demand in the North American
(Class 8) heavy truck market.
Our principal customers in North America include PACCAR,
International, Caterpillar, Freightliner and Volvo/ Mack. We
believe we are an important long-term supplier to all leading
truck manufacturers in North America because of our
comprehensive product offerings, leading brand names and product
innovation. In our European, China and Australian operations,
our principal customers in the commercial vehicle market include
Caterpillar, Volvo/Mack, Komatsu, Hitachi, CNH Global (Case New
Holland) and JCB Limited.
The following is a summary of our significant revenues by OEM
customer for the three years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
PACCAR
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Caterpillar
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Freightliner
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Volvo/Mack
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Oshkosh Truck
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Komatsu
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Deere & Co.
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Except as set forth in the above table, no other customer
accounted for more than 10% of our revenues for the three years
ended December 31, 2007. The change in revenues by
significant OEM customers in 2007 is primarily related to the
decreased demand in the North American (Class 8) heavy
truck market.
14
Our European, China, Australian and Mexican operations
collectively contributed approximately 23%, 13% and 16% of our
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The change in revenue by geographic location
in 2007 is primarily related to the decreased demand in the
North American (Class 8) heavy truck market as well as
the impact of the CIEB and PEKM acquisitions.
Our OEM customers generally source business to us pursuant to
written contracts, purchase orders or other firm commitments in
terms of price, quality, technology and delivery. Awarded
business generally covers the supply of all or a portion of a
customers production and service requirements for a
particular product program rather than the supply of a specific
quantity of products. In general, these contracts, purchase
orders and commitments provide that the customer can terminate
the contract, purchase order or commitment if we do not meet
specified quality, delivery and cost requirements. Such
contracts, purchase orders or other firm commitments generally
extend for the entire life of a platform, which is typically
five to seven years. Although these contracts, purchase orders
or other commitments may be terminated at any time by our
customers (but not by us), such terminations have been minimal
and have not had a material impact on our results of operations.
In order to reduce our reliance on any one vehicle model, we
produce products for a broad cross-section of both new and more
established models.
Our contracts with our major OEM customers generally provide for
an annual productivity cost reduction. These reductions are
calculated on an annual basis as a percentage of the previous
years purchases by each customer. The reduction is
achieved through engineering changes, material cost reductions,
logistics savings, reductions in packaging cost and labor
efficiencies. Historically, most of these cost reductions have
been offset by both internal reductions and through the
assistance of our supply base, although no assurances can be
given that we will be able to achieve such reductions in the
future. If the annual reduction targets are not achieved, the
difference is recovered through price reductions. Our cost
structure is comprised of a high percentage of variable costs
that provides us with additional flexibility during economic
cycles.
Our sales and marketing efforts with respect to our OEM sales
are designed to create overall awareness of our engineering,
design and manufacturing capabilities and to enable us to be
selected to supply products for new and redesigned models by our
OEM customers. Our sales and marketing staff works closely with
our design and engineering personnel to prepare the materials
used for bidding on new business as well as to provide a
consistent interface between us and our key customers. We
currently have sales and marketing personnel located in every
major region in which we operate. From time to time, we also
participate in industry trade shows and advertise in industry
publications. One of our ongoing initiatives is to negotiate and
enter into long term supply agreements with our existing
customers that allow us to leverage all of our business and
provide a complete cab system to our commercial vehicle OEM
customers.
Our principal customers for our aftermarket sales include OEM
dealers and independent wholesale distributors. Our sales and
marketing efforts for our aftermarket sales are focused on
support of these two distribution chains, as well as direct
contact with all major fleets.
Backlog
We do not generally obtain long-term, firm purchase orders from
our customers. Rather, our customers typically place annual
blanket purchase orders, but these orders do not obligate them
to purchase any specific or minimum amount of products from us
until a release is issued by the customer under the blanket
purchase order. Releases are typically placed within 30 to
90 days of required delivery and may be canceled at any
time, in which case the customer would be liable for work in
process and finished goods. We do not believe that our backlog
of expected product sales covered by firm purchase orders is a
meaningful indicator of future sales since orders may be
rescheduled or canceled.
Competition
Within each of our principal product categories, we compete with
a variety of independent suppliers and with OEMs in-house
operations, primarily on the basis of price, breadth of product
offerings, product quality, technical expertise, development
capability, product delivery and product service. We believe we
are the only supplier in the North American commercial vehicle
market that can offer complete cab systems in sequence
integrating interior
15
systems (including seats, interior trim and flooring systems),
mirrors and wire harnesses with the cab structure. A summary of
our estimated market position and primary independent
competitors is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Seats and Seating Systems. We believe that we
have the number one market position in North America supplying
seats and seating systems to the commercial vehicle heavy-truck
market. We also believe that we have the number one market
position in supplying seats and seating systems to commercial
vehicles used in the medium/heavy construction equipment
industry on a worldwide basis. Our primary independent
competitors in the North American commercial vehicle market
include Sears Manufacturing Company, Accuride Corporation,
Grammer AG and Seats, Inc., and our primary competitors in the
European commercial vehicle market include Grammer AG and
Isringhausen.
|
|
|
|
Trim Systems and Components. We believe that
we have the number one market position in the North American
commercial vehicle heavy-truck market with respect to our soft
interior trim products and a leading presence in the hard
interior trim market. We face competition from a number of
different competitors with respect to each of our trim system
products and components. Overall, our primary independent
competitors are ConMet, Fabriform, TPI, Findlay, Superior, Trim
Masters, Inc., Blachford Ltd. and Mitras.
|
|
|
|
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls. We believe that
we are a leading supplier in the North American commercial
vehicle heavy-truck market with respect to our windshield wiper
systems and mirrors. We face competition from a number of
different competitors with respect to each of our principal
products in this category. Our principal competitors for mirrors
are Hadley, Lang-Mekra and Trucklite, and our principal
competitors for windshield wiper systems are Johnson Electric,
Trico and Valeo.
|
|
|
|
Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
Components. We believe we are the leading
non-captive supplier in the North American commercial vehicle
heavy-truck market with respect to our cab structural
components, cab structures, sleeper boxes and body panels. Our
principal competitors are Magna, Ogihara Corporation,
Spartanburg Stamping, Able Body and Defiance Metal Products.
|
|
|
|
Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel
Assemblies. We believe that we are a leading
supplier of low- to medium-volume complex, electronic wire
harnesses and related assemblies used in the global heavy
equipment, commercial vehicle, heavy-truck and specialty and
military vehicle markets. Our principal competitors for
electronic wire harnesses include large diversified suppliers
such as AFL, Delphi, Leoni, Nexans, PKC, Stoneridge, Yazaki and
smaller independent companies such as Fargo Assembly and
Unlimited Services.
|
Research
and Development, Design and Engineering
Our objective is to be a leader in offering superior quality and
technologically advanced products to our customers at
competitive prices. We engage in ongoing engineering and
research and development activities to improve the reliability,
performance and cost-effectiveness of our existing products and
to design and develop new products for existing and new
applications.
We generally work with our customers engineering and
development teams at the beginning of the design process for new
components and assemblies, or the redesign process for existing
components and assemblies, in order to maximize production
efficiency and quality. These processes may take place from one
to three years prior to the commencement of production. On
average, the development time for a new component takes between
12 and 24 months during the design phase, while the
re-engineering of an existing part may take between one and six
months. Early design involvement can result in a product that
meets or exceeds the customers design and performance
requirements and is more efficient to manufacture. In addition,
our extensive involvement enhances our position for bidding on
such business. We work aggressively to ensure that our quality
and delivery metrics distinguish us from our competitors.
We focus on bringing our customers integrated products that have
superior content, comfort and safety. Consistent with our
value-added engineering focus, we place a large emphasis on the
relationships with the engineering departments of our customers.
These relationships not only help us to identify new business
16
opportunities but also enable us to compete based on the quality
of our products and services, rather than exclusively on price.
We are currently involved in the design stage of several
products for our customers and expect to begin production of
these products in the years 2008 to 2012.
Intellectual
Property
We consider ourselves to be a leader in both product and process
technology, and, therefore, protection of intellectual property
is important to our business. Our principal intellectual
property consists of product and process technology, a limited
number of United States and foreign patents, trade secrets,
trademarks and copyrights. Although our intellectual property is
important to our business operations and in the aggregate
constitutes a valuable asset, we do not believe that any single
patent, trade secret, trademark or copyright, or group of
patents, trade secrets, trademarks or copyrights is critical to
the success of our business. Our policy is to seek statutory
protection for all significant intellectual property embodied in
patents, trademarks and copyrights. From time to time, we grant
licenses under our patents and technology and receive licenses
under patents and technology of others.
We market our products under brand names that include KAB
Seating, National Seating, Trim Systems and Sprague Controls,
Sprague
Devices®,
Prutsmantm,
Moto
Mirror®,
RoadWatch®,
and
Mayflower®.
We believe that our brands are valuable and are increasing in
value with the growth of our business, but that our business is
not dependent on such brands. We own U.S. federal trademark
registrations for several of our brands.
Seasonality
OEMs production requirements can fluctuate as the demand
for new vehicles soften during the holiday seasons in North
America, Europe and Asia as OEM manufacturers generally close
their production facilities at various times during the year.
Employees
As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately 6,410
permanent employees, of which approximately 18% were salaried
and the remainder were hourly. Approximately 43% of the
employees in our North American operations were unionized, and
approximately 48% of our employees at our Europe and Asia
operations were represented by shop steward committees. We have
not experienced any material strikes, lockouts or work stoppages
during 2007 and consider our relationship with our employees to
be satisfactory. On an as needed basis during peak periods,
contract and temporary employees are utilized.
Available
Information
We maintain a website on the Internet at www.cvgrp.com. We make
available free of charge through our website, by way of a
hyperlink to a third-party Securities Exchange Commission (SEC)
filing website, our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports electronically filed or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act of 1934. Such information is available as soon as
such reports are filed with the SEC. Additionally, our Code of
Ethics may be accessed within the Investor Relations section of
our website. Information found on our website is not part of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
or any other report filed with the SEC.
You should carefully consider the risks described below before
making an investment decision. The risks and uncertainties
described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks
and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently
deem immaterial may also impair our business operations.
17
If any of these certain risks and uncertainties were to actually
occur, our business, financial condition or results of
operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case,
the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may
lose all or part of your investment. These risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
Volatility and cyclicality in the commercial vehicle market
could adversely affect us.
|
Our profitability depends in part on the varying conditions in
the commercial vehicle market. This market is subject to
considerable volatility as it moves in response to cycles in the
overall business environment and is particularly sensitive to
the industrial sector, which generates a significant portion of
the freight tonnage hauled. Sales of commercial vehicles have
historically been cyclical, with demand affected by such
economic factors as industrial production, construction levels,
demand for consumer durable goods, interest rates and fuel
costs. For example, North American commercial vehicle sales and
production experienced a downturn from 2000 to 2003 due to a
confluence of events that included a weak economy, an oversupply
of new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending on
commercial vehicles and equipment. In addition, North American
commercial vehicle sales and production experienced a downturn
during 2007 as a result of pre-orders in 2006 and general
weakness in the North American economy and corresponding decline
in the need for commercial vehicles to haul freight tonnage in
North America, among other factors. These downturns had a
material adverse effect on our business during the same periods.
We cannot provide any assurance as to the length or ultimate
level of the recovery of this decline. We expect that unit
production of class 8 heavy trucks will not materially
recover from 2007 levels in 2008. Nor can we predict that the
industry will follow past cyclical patterns that might include a
strong 2009 pre-order in advance of new emissions standards set
to take place in 2010.
|
|
|
Our profitability could be adversely affected if the actual
production volumes for our customers vehicles are
significantly lower than expected.
|
We incur costs and make capital expenditures based upon
estimates of production volumes for our customers
vehicles. While we attempt to establish a price for our
components and systems that will compensate for variances in
production volumes, if the actual production of these vehicles
is significantly less than anticipated, our gross margin on
these products would be adversely affected. We enter into
agreements with our customers at the beginning of a given
platforms life to supply products for that platform. Once
we enter into such agreements, fulfillment of our purchasing
requirements is our obligation for the entire production life of
the platform, with terms ranging from five to seven years, and
we have no provisions to terminate such contracts. We may become
committed to supply products to our customers at selling prices
that are not sufficient to cover the direct cost to produce such
products. We cannot predict our customers demands for our
products either in the aggregate or for particular reporting
periods. If customers representing a significant amount of our
revenues were to purchase materially lower volumes than
expected, it would have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our major OEM customers may exert significant influence over
us.
|
The commercial vehicle component supply industry has
traditionally been highly fragmented and serves a limited number
of large OEMs. As a result, OEMs have historically had a
significant amount of leverage over their outside suppliers. Our
contracts with major OEM customers generally provide for an
annual productivity cost reduction. Historically, cost
reductions through product design changes, increased
productivity and similar programs with our suppliers have
generally offset these customer-imposed productivity cost
reduction requirements. However, if we are unable to generate
sufficient production cost savings in the future to offset price
reductions, our gross margin and profitability would be
adversely affected. In addition, changes in OEMs
purchasing policies or payment practices could have an adverse
effect on our business.
|
|
|
We may be unable to successfully implement our business
strategy and, as a result, our businesses and financial position
and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected.
|
Our ability to achieve our business and financial objectives is
subject to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our
control. For example, we may not be successful in implementing
our strategy if unforeseen factors
18
emerge that diminish the expected growth in the commercial
vehicle markets we supply, or we experience increased pressure
on our margins. In addition, we may not succeed in integrating
strategic acquisitions and our pursuit of additional strategic
acquisitions may lead to resource constraints which could have a
negative impact on our ability to meet customers demands,
thereby adversely affecting our relationships with those
customers. As a result of such business or competitive factors,
we may decide to alter or discontinue aspects of our business
strategy and may adopt alternative or additional strategies. Any
failure to successfully implement our business strategy could
adversely affect our business, results of operations and growth
potential.
Developing product innovations has been and will continue to be
a significant part of our business strategy. We believe that it
is important that we continue to meet our customers
demands for product innovation, improvement and enhancement,
including the continued development of new-generation products,
design improvements and innovations that improve the quality and
efficiency of our products. However, such development will
require us to continue to invest in research and development and
sales and marketing. In the future, we may not have sufficient
resources to make such necessary investments, or we may be
unable to make the technological advances necessary to carry out
product innovations sufficient to meet our customers
demands. We are also subject to the risks generally associated
with product development, including lack of market acceptance,
delays in product development and failure of products to operate
properly. We may, as a result of these factors, be unable to
meaningfully focus on product innovation as a strategy and may
therefore be unable to meet our customers demands for
product innovation.
|
|
|
If we are unable to obtain raw materials at favorable prices,
it could adversely impact our results of operations and
financial condition.
|
Numerous raw materials are used in the manufacture of our
products. Steel, aluminum, petroleum-based products, copper,
resin, foam, fabrics, wire and wire components account for the
most significant portion of our raw material costs. Although we
currently maintain alternative sources for raw materials, our
business is subject to the risk of price increases and periodic
delays in delivery. For example, we are currently being assessed
surcharges as well as price increases on certain purchases of
steel, copper and other raw materials. If we are unable to
purchase certain raw materials required for our operations for a
significant period of time, our operations would be disrupted,
and our results of operations would be adversely affected. In
addition, if we are unable to pass on the increased costs of raw
materials to our customers, this could adversely affect our
results of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
We may be unable to complete additional strategic
acquisitions or we may encounter unforeseen difficulties in
integrating acquisitions.
|
We intend to actively pursue additional acquisition targets that
will allow us to continue to expand into new geographic markets,
add new customers, provide new product, manufacturing and
service capabilities and increase penetration with existing
customers. However, we expect to face competition for
acquisition candidates, which may limit the number of our
acquisition opportunities and may lead to higher acquisition
prices. Moreover, acquisitions of businesses may require
additional debt financing, resulting in additional leverage. The
covenants of our senior credit facility may further limit our
ability to complete acquisitions. There can be no assurance that
we will find attractive acquisition candidates or successfully
integrate acquired businesses into our existing business. If we
fail to complete additional acquisitions, we may have difficulty
competing with more thoroughly integrated competitors and our
results of operations could be adversely affected. To the extent
that we do complete additional acquisitions, if the expected
synergies from such acquisitions do not materialize or we fail
to successfully integrate such new businesses into our existing
businesses, our results of operations could also be adversely
affected.
|
|
|
We may be adversely impacted by labor strikes, work stoppages
and other matters.
|
The hourly workforces at our Norwalk and Shadyside, Ohio
facilities and Mexico operations are unionized. The unionized
employees at these facilities represented approximately 43% of
our employees in our North American operations as of
December 31, 2007. We have experienced limited unionization
efforts at certain of our other North American facilities from
time to time. In addition, 48% of our employees at our Europe
and Asia operations are represented by a shop steward committee,
which may seek to limit our flexibility in our relationship
19
with these employees. We cannot assure you that we will not
encounter future unionization efforts or other types of
conflicts with labor unions or our employees.
Many of our OEM customers and their suppliers also have
unionized work forces. Work stoppages or slow-downs experienced
by OEMs or their other suppliers could result in slow-downs or
closures of assembly plants where our products are included in
assembled commercial vehicles. In the event that one or more of
our customers or their suppliers experience a material work
stoppage, such work stoppage could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
|
|
|
Our businesses are subject to statutory environmental and
safety regulations in multiple jurisdictions, and the impact of
any changes in regulation
and/or the
violation of any applicable laws and regulations by our
businesses could result in a material and adverse affect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
|
We are subject to foreign, federal, state, and local laws and
regulations governing the protection of the environment and
occupational health and safety, including laws regulating air
emissions, wastewater discharges, the generation, storage,
handling, use and transportation of hazardous materials; the
emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the soil,
ground or air; and the health and safety of our colleagues. We
are also required to obtain permits from governmental
authorities for certain of our operations. We cannot assure you
that we are, or have been, in complete compliance with such
environment and safety laws, regulations and permits. If we
violate or fail to comply with these laws, regulations or
permits, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by
regulators. In some instances, such a fine or sanction could
have a material adverse effect on us. The environmental laws to
which we are subject have become more stringent over time, and
we could incur material expenses in the future to comply with
environmental laws. We are also subject to laws imposing
liability for the cleanup of contaminated property. Under these
laws, we could be held liable for costs and damages relating to
contamination at our past or present facilities and at third
party sites to which we sent waste containing hazardous
substances. The amount of such liability could be material.
Several of our facilities are either certified as, or are in the
process of being certified as ISO 9001, 14000, 14001 or TS16949
(the international environmental management standard) compliant
or are developing similar environmental management systems.
Although we have made, and will continue to make, capital
expenditures to implement such environmental programs and comply
with environmental requirements, we do not expect to make
material capital expenditures for environmental controls in
2008. The environmental laws to which we are subject have become
more stringent over time, however, and we could incur material
costs or expenses in the future to comply with environmental
laws.
Certain of our operations generate hazardous substances and
wastes. If a release of such substances or wastes occurs at or
from our properties, or at or from any offsite disposal location
to which substances or wastes from our current or former
operations were taken, or if contamination is discovered at any
of our current or former properties, we may be held liable for
the costs of cleanup and for any other response by governmental
authorities or private parties, together with any associated
fines, penalties or damages. In most jurisdictions, this
liability would arise whether or not we had complied with
environmental laws governing the handling of hazardous
substances or wastes.
|
|
|
We may be adversely affected by the impact of government
regulations on our OEM customers.
|
Although the products we manufacture and supply to commercial
vehicle OEMs are not subject to significant government
regulation, our business is indirectly impacted by the extensive
governmental regulation applicable to commercial vehicle OEMs.
These regulations primarily relate to emissions and noise
standards imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), state regulatory agencies, such as the
California Air Resources Board (CARB), and other
regulatory agencies around the world. Commercial vehicle OEMs
are also subject to the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle
Safety Act and Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
promulgated by the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration. Changes in emission standards and other proposed
governmental regulations could impact the demand for commercial
vehicles and, as a result, indirectly impact our operations. For
example, new emission standards governing Heavy-duty
(Class 8) diesel engines that went into effect in the
United States on October 1, 2002 and January 1, 2007
resulted in significant purchases of new trucks by fleet
operators
20
prior to such date and reduced short term demand for such trucks
in periods immediately following such date. New emission
standards for truck engines used in Class 5 to 8 trucks
imposed by the EPA and CARB are scheduled to become effective in
2010. To the extent that current or future governmental
regulation has a negative impact on the demand for commercial
vehicles, our business, financial condition or results of
operations could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
Our customer base is concentrated and the loss of business
from a major customer or the discontinuation of particular
commercial vehicle platforms could reduce our revenues.
|
Sales to PACCAR, International, Caterpillar, Freightliner and
Volvo/Mack accounted for approximately 14%, 11%, 11%, 11% and
11%, respectively, of our revenue in 2007, and our ten largest
customers accounted for approximately 71% of our revenue in
2007. The loss of any of our largest customers or the loss of
significant business from any of these customers could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. Even though we may be selected as the
supplier of a product by an OEM for a particular vehicle, our
OEM customers issue blanket purchase orders which generally
provide for the supply of that customers annual
requirements for that vehicle, rather than for a specific number
of our products. If the OEMs requirements are less than
estimated, the number of products we sell to that OEM will be
accordingly reduced. In addition, the OEM may terminate its
purchase orders with us at any time.
|
|
|
Currency exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse
effect on our revenues and results of operations.
|
We have operations in Europe, China, Australia and Mexico, which
accounted for approximately 23% of our revenues in 2007. As a
result, we generate a significant portion of our sales and incur
a significant portion of our expenses in currencies other than
the U.S. dollar. To the extent that we are unable to match
revenues received in foreign currencies with costs paid in the
same currency, exchange rate fluctuations in any such currency
could have an adverse effect on our financial results.
|
|
|
We are subject to certain risks associated with our foreign
operations.
|
We have operations in Europe, China, Australia and Mexico, which
accounted for approximately 23%, 13% and 16% of our total
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. There are certain risks inherent in our
international business activities including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
the difficulty of enforcing agreements and collecting
receivables through certain foreign legal systems;
|
|
|
|
foreign customers, who may have longer payment cycles than
customers in the United States;
|
|
|
|
tax rates in certain foreign countries, which may exceed those
in the United States and foreign earnings may be subject to
withholding requirements or the imposition of tariffs, exchange
controls or other restrictions, including restrictions on
repatriation;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property protection difficulties;
|
|
|
|
general economic and political conditions in countries where we
operate, which may have an adverse effect on our operations in
those countries;
|
|
|
|
the difficulties associated with managing a large organization
spread throughout various countries; and
|
|
|
|
complications in complying with a variety of foreign laws and
regulations, which may conflict with United States law.
|
As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will
be dependent, in part, on our ability to anticipate and
effectively manage these and other risks associated with foreign
operations. We cannot assure you that these and other factors
will not have a material adverse effect on our international
operations or our business, financial condition or results of
operations as a whole.
21
|
|
|
Our inability to compete effectively in the highly
competitive commercial vehicle component supply industry could
result in lower prices for our products, reduced gross margins
and loss of market share, which could have an adverse effect on
our revenues and operating results.
|
The commercial vehicle component supply industry is highly
competitive. Our products primarily compete on the basis of
price, breadth of product offerings, product quality, technical
expertise and development capability, product delivery and
product service. Increased competition may lead to price
reductions resulting in reduced gross margins and loss of market
share.
Current and future competitors may make strategic acquisitions
or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with
others, foresee the course of market development more accurately
than we do, develop products that are superior to our products,
produce similar products at lower cost than we can or adapt more
quickly to new technologies, industry or customer requirements.
By doing so, they may enhance their ability to meet the needs of
our customers or potential future customers. These developments
could limit our ability to obtain revenues from new customers
and to maintain existing revenues from our customer base. We may
not be able to compete successfully against current and future
competitors and the failure to do so may have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition.
|
|
|
Our products may be rendered less attractive by changes in
competitive technologies.
|
Changes in competitive technologies may render certain of our
products less attractive. Our ability to anticipate changes in
technology and to successfully develop and introduce new and
enhanced products on a timely basis will be a significant factor
in our ability to remain competitive. There can be no assurance
that we will be able to achieve the technological advances that
may be necessary for us to remain competitive. We are also
subject to the risks generally associated with new product
introductions and applications, including lack of market
acceptance, delays in product development and failure to operate
properly.
|
|
|
If we are unable to recruit or retain skilled personnel, or
if we lose the services of any of our key management personnel,
our business, operating results and financial condition could be
materially adversely affected.
|
Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract,
train, integrate and retain highly skilled personnel.
Competition for these employees is intense. We may not be able
to retain our current key employees or attract, train, integrate
or retain other highly skilled personnel in the future. Our
future success also depends in large part on the continued
service of key management personnel, particularly our key
executive officers. If we lose the services of one or more of
these individuals or other key personnel, or if we are unable to
attract, train, integrate and retain the highly skilled
personnel we need, our business, operating results and financial
condition could be materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
We have only limited protection for our proprietary rights in
our intellectual property, which makes it difficult to prevent
third parties from infringing upon our rights.
|
Our success depends to a certain degree on our ability to
protect our intellectual property and to operate without
infringing on the proprietary rights of third parties. While we
have been issued patents and have registered trademarks with
respect to many of our products, our competitors could
independently develop similar or superior products or
technologies, duplicate our designs, trademarks, processes or
other intellectual property or design around any processes or
designs on which we have or may obtain patents or trademark
protection. In addition, it is possible that third parties may
have or acquire licenses for other technology or designs that we
may use or desire to use, so that we may need to acquire
licenses to, or to contest the validity of, such patents or
trademarks of third parties. Such licenses may not be made
available to us on acceptable terms, if at all, and we may not
prevail in contesting the validity of third party rights.
In addition to patent and trademark protection, we also protect
trade secrets, know-how and other confidential information
against unauthorized use by others or disclosure by persons who
have access to them, such as our employees, through contractual
arrangements. These arrangements may not provide meaningful
protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary
information in the event of any unauthorized use,
misappropriation or
22
disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary
information. If we are unable to maintain the proprietary nature
of our technologies, our revenues could be materially adversely
affected.
|
|
|
Our products may be susceptible to claims by third parties
that our products infringe upon their proprietary rights.
|
As the number of products in our target markets increases and
the functionality of these products further overlaps, we may
become increasingly subject to claims by a third party that our
technology infringes such partys proprietary rights.
Regardless of their merit, any such claims could be time
consuming and expensive to defend, may divert managements
attention and resources, could cause product shipment delays and
could require us to enter into costly royalty or licensing
agreements. If successful, a claim of infringement against us
and our inability to license the infringed or similar technology
and/or
product could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results and financial condition.
|
|
|
The market price of our common stock may be extremely
volatile.
|
Our stock price has fluctuated since our initial public offering
in August 2004. The trading price of our common stock is subject
to significant fluctuations in response to variations in
quarterly operating results, including foreign currency exchange
fluctuations, the gain or loss of significant orders, changes in
earnings estimates by analysts, announcements of technological
innovations or new products by us or our competitors, general
conditions in the commercial vehicle industry and other events
or factors. In addition, the equity markets in general have
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations which have
affected the market price for many companies in industries
similar or related to that of ours and which have been unrelated
to the operating performance of these companies. These market
fluctuations may have affected and may continue to affect the
market price of our common stock.
|
|
|
Our operating results, revenues and expenses may fluctuate
significantly from quarter-to-quarter or year-to-year, which
could have an adverse effect on the market price of our
stock.
|
For a number of reasons, including but not limited to, those
described below, our operating results, revenues and expenses
have in the past varied and may in the future vary significantly
from quarter-to-quarter or year-to-year. These fluctuations
could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common
stock.
Fluctuations in Quarterly or Annual Operating
Results. Our operating results may fluctuate as a
result of:
|
|
|
|
|
the size, timing, volume and execution of significant orders and
shipments;
|
|
|
|
changes in the terms of our sales contracts;
|
|
|
|
the timing of new product announcements;
|
|
|
|
changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;
|
|
|
|
market acceptance of new and enhanced products;
|
|
|
|
the length of our sales cycles;
|
|
|
|
changes in our operating expenses;
|
|
|
|
personnel changes;
|
|
|
|
new business acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign currency exchange rates; and
|
|
|
|
seasonal factors.
|
Limited Ability to Adjust Expenses. We base
our operating expense budgets primarily on expected revenue
trends. Certain of our expenses are relatively fixed and as such
we may be unable to adjust expenses quickly enough to offset any
unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, any shortfall in
revenue may cause significant variation in operating results in
any quarter or year.
23
Based on the above factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter
or year-to-year comparisons of our operating results may not be
a good indication of our future performance. It is possible that
in one or more future quarters or years, our operating results
may be below the expectations of public market analysts and
investors. In that event, the trading price of our common stock
may be adversely affected.
|
|
|
We may be subject to product liability claims, recalls or
warranty claims, which could be expensive, damage our reputation
and result in a diversion of management resources.
|
As a supplier of products and systems to commercial vehicle
OEMs, we face an inherent business risk of exposure to product
liability claims in the event that our products, or the
equipment into which our products are incorporated, malfunction
and result in personal injury or death. Product liability claims
could result in significant losses as a result of expenses
incurred in defending claims or the award of damages.
In addition, we may be required to participate in recalls
involving systems or components sold by us if any prove to be
defective, or we may voluntarily initiate a recall or make
payments related to such claims as a result of various industry
or business practices or the need to maintain good customer
relationships. Such a recall would result in a diversion of
management resources. While we do maintain product liability
insurance, we cannot assure you that it will be sufficient to
cover all product liability claims, that such claims will not
exceed our insurance coverage limits or that such insurance will
continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at
all. Any product liability claim brought against us could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Moreover, we warrant the workmanship and materials of many of
our products under limited warranties and have entered into
warranty agreements with certain OEMs that warranty certain of
our products in the hands of these OEMs customers, in some
cases for as long as six years. Accordingly, we are subject to
risk of warranty claims in the event that our products do not
conform to our customers specifications or, in some cases
in the event that our products do not conform with their
customers expectations. It is possible for warranty claims
to result in costly product recalls, significant repair costs
and damage to our reputation, all of which would adversely
affect our results of operations.
|
|
|
Equipment failures, delays in deliveries or catastrophic loss
at any of our facilities could lead to production or service
curtailments or shutdowns.
|
We manufacture or assemble our products at facilities in North
America, Europe, China and Australia. An interruption in
production or service capabilities at any of these facilities as
a result of equipment failure or other reasons could result in
our inability to produce our products, which could reduce our
net revenues and earnings for the affected period. In the event
of a stoppage in production at any of our facilities, even if
only temporary, or if we experience delays as a result of events
that are beyond our control, delivery times to our customers
could be severely affected. Any significant delay in deliveries
to our customers could lead to increased returns or
cancellations and cause us to lose future revenues. Our
facilities are also subject to the risk of catastrophic loss due
to unanticipated events such as fires, explosions or violent
weather conditions. We may experience plant shutdowns or periods
of reduced production as a result of equipment failure, delays
in deliveries or catastrophic loss, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations or
financial condition.
|
|
|
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial
condition and make it more difficult to implement our business
strategy.
|
The aggregate amount of our outstanding indebtedness was
$159.7 million as of December 31, 2007. Our
substantial level of indebtedness increases the possibility that
we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay, when due,
the principal of, interest on or other amounts due in respect of
our indebtedness, including the notes. Our substantial
indebtedness, combined with our lease and other financial
obligations and contractual commitments could have other
important consequences to you as a shareholder. For example, it
could:
|
|
|
|
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with
respect to our indebtedness, including the notes, and any
failure to comply with the obligations of any of our debt
instruments, including financial and other restrictive
covenants, could result in an event of default under the
indenture governing the notes and the agreements governing such
other indebtedness;
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
make us more vulnerable to adverse changes in general economic,
industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in
government regulation;
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby
reducing the availability of our cash flows to fund working
capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general
corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our business and the industry in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow additional amounts for working
capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service
requirements, execution of our business strategy or other
purposes.
|
Any of the above listed factors could materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
|
|
|
The terms of our senior credit facility and the indenture
governing the 8.0% senior notes due 2013 may restrict
our current and future operations, particularly our ability to
respond to changes in our business or to take certain
actions.
|
Our senior credit facility and the indenture governing the
8.0% senior notes due 2013 contain covenants that, among
other things, restricts our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur liens;
|
|
|
|
incur or assume additional debt or guarantees or issue preferred
stock;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends, or make redemptions and repurchases, with respect
to capital stock;
|
|
|
|
prepay, or make redemptions and repurchases of, subordinated
debt;
|
|
|
|
make loans and investments;
|
|
|
|
make capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
engage in mergers, acquisitions, asset sales, sale/leaseback
transactions and transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
change the business conducted by us or our subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
amend the terms of subordinated debt.
|
Also, our senior credit facility requires us to maintain
compliance with specified financial ratios and satisfy certain
financial condition tests (some of which become more restrictive
over time). If we do not comply with such covenants or satisfy
such ratios, our lenders could declare an event of default under
the senior credit facility, and our indebtedness could be
declared immediately due and payable. Our ability to comply with
the provisions of the senior credit facility may be affected by
changes in economic or business conditions beyond our control.
In addition, these covenants could affect our ability to operate
our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of
potential business opportunities as they arise.
|
|
|
Our inability to successfully execute any planned cost
reductions, restructuring initiatives or the achievement of
operational efficiencies could result in the incurrence of
additional costs and expenses that could adversely affect our
reported earnings.
|
As part of our business strategy, we continuously seek ways to
lower costs, improve manufacturing efficiencies and increase
productivity and intend to apply this strategy to those
operations acquired through acquisitions. We may be unsuccessful
in achieving these objectives which could adversely affect our
operating results and financial condition. In addition, we may
incur restructuring charges in the future and such charges could
adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
25
|
|
|
Our earnings may be adversely affected by changes to the
carrying values of our tangible and intangible assets, including
goodwill, as a result of recording any impairment charges deemed
necessary in conjunction with the execution of our periodic
asset impairment assessment and testing policy.
|
At December 31, 2007, we had goodwill of approximately
$151.2 million and other intangible assets of approximately
$97.6 million. We may identify additional anticipated or
unanticipated impairments in any of our tangible or intangible
asset categories in future testing periods and be required to
record charges against earnings in the period in which the
impairment is identified. Specific indicators that give rise to
asset impairment may include, but are not limited to, changes in
the general economic environment, changes or downturns in our
industry as a whole, termination of any of our customer
contracts, restructuring efforts and general workforce
reductions among other factors.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
Our corporate office is located in New Albany, Ohio. Several of
our manufacturing facilities are located near our OEM customers
to reduce our distribution costs, reduce risk of interruptions
in our delivery schedule, further improve customer service and
provide our customers with reliable delivery of products and
services. The following table provides selected information
regarding our principal facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Primary Product/Function
|
|
Square Footage
|
|
Ownership Interest
|
|
Douglas, Arizona
|
|
Warehouse Facility
|
|
20,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Monona, Iowa
|
|
Wire Harness Assembly
|
|
62,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Owned
|
Edgewood, Iowa
|
|
Wire Harness Assembly
|
|
36,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Dekalb, Illinois
|
|
Cab Assembly
|
|
60,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Michigan City, Indiana
|
|
Wipers, Switches
|
|
87,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Wixom, Michigan
|
|
Engineering
|
|
7,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Kings Mountain, North Carolina
|
|
Cab, Sleeper Box, Assembly
|
|
180,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Owned
|
Statesville, North Carolina (2 facilities)
|
|
Interior Trim, Seats
|
|
163,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Concord, North Carolina (2 facilities)
|
|
Injection Molding
|
|
150,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Norwalk, Ohio (3 facilities)
|
|
Cab, Sleeper Box, Assembly
|
|
360,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Owned/Leased
|
Shadyside, Ohio
|
|
Stamping of Steel and Aluminum Structural and Exposed Stamped
Components
|
|
200,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Owned
|
Chillicothe, Ohio
|
|
Interior Trim
|
|
62,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Owned
|
Bellaire, Ohio
|
|
Warehouse Facility
|
|
41,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Dublin, Ohio
|
|
Administration
|
|
14,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
New Albany, Ohio (2 facilities)
|
|
Corporate Headquarters / R&D
|
|
55,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Canby, Oregon
|
|
Electronics Assembly
|
|
4,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Tigard, Oregon
|
|
Interior Trim
|
|
121,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Lake Oswego, Oregon
|
|
RIM Process
|
|
24,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Vonore, Tennessee (2 facilities)
|
|
Seats, Mirrors
|
|
245,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Owned/Leased
|
Tellico Plains, Tennessee (2 facilities)
|
|
Cut and Sew, Warehouse Facility
|
|
148,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Primary Product/Function
|
|
Square Footage
|
|
Ownership Interest
|
|
Pikeville, Tennessee
|
|
Cut and Sew
|
|
15,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Dublin, Virginia
|
|
Interior Trim, Seats
|
|
79,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Owned
|
Seattle, Washington
|
|
RIM Process, Interior Trim, Seats
|
|
156,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Owned
|
Vancouver, Washington (2 facilities)
|
|
Interior Trim
|
|
63,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Tacoma, Washington
|
|
Injection Molding
|
|
25,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Agua Prieta, Mexico (2 facilities)
|
|
Wire Harness Assembly
|
|
205,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Northampton, United Kingdom
|
|
Seat Assembly
|
|
210,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Seneffs (Brussels), Belgium
|
|
Seat Assembly
|
|
35,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Brisbane, Australia
|
|
Seat Assembly
|
|
50,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Shanghai, China (2 facilities)
|
|
Seat Assembly
|
|
76,500 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Brandys nad Orlici, Czech Republic
|
|
Seat Assembly
|
|
52,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Owned
|
Liberec, Czech Republic (2 facilities)
|
|
Wire Harness Assembly
|
|
155,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
Kamyanets-Podilsky, Ukraine
|
|
Wire Harness Assembly
|
|
46,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Leased
|
We also have leased sales and service offices located in the
United States, Australia, France and Czech Republic.
Utilization of our facilities varies with North American,
European and Asian commercial vehicle production and general
economic conditions in such regions. All locations are
principally used for manufacturing or assembly, except for our
Wixom, Michigan and New Albany and Dublin, Ohio facilities which
are administrative offices and our leased warehouse facilities
in Douglas, Arizona, Tellico Plains, Tennessee and Bellaire,
Ohio. During the fourth quarter of 2007 and first quarter of
2008, our corporate headquarters, administrative and R&D
facilities in Plain City, Gahanna, Dublin and New Albany, Ohio
were consolidated into a single 50,000 square foot leased
world headquarters and an attached 39,000 square foot
Research and Development Center in New Albany, Ohio.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising
in the ordinary course of business, including, but not limited
to, customer and supplier disputes and product liability claims
arising out of the conduct of our businesses and examinations by
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The IRS
routinely examines our federal income tax returns and, in the
course of those examinations, the IRS may propose adjustments to
our federal income tax liability reported on such returns. It is
our practice to defend those proposed adjustments that we deem
lacking merit. We are not involved in any litigation at this
time in which we expect that an unfavorable outcome of the
proceedings, including any proposed adjustments presented to
date by the IRS, individually or collectively, will have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
There were no matters submitted to a vote of stockholders during
the fourth quarter of 2007.
27
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market
under the symbol CVGI. The following table sets
forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock, for the
periods indicated as regularly reported by the Nasdaq Global
Select Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
16.38
|
|
|
$
|
12.11
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.29
|
|
|
$
|
12.71
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
21.03
|
|
|
$
|
17.70
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
22.24
|
|
|
$
|
18.82
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
23.57
|
|
|
$
|
18.47
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
21.08
|
|
|
$
|
17.19
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
21.25
|
|
|
$
|
17.82
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
22.29
|
|
|
$
|
17.10
|
|
As of February 29, 2008, there were 100 holders of record
of our outstanding common stock.
We have not declared or paid any dividends to the holders of our
common stock in the past and do not anticipate paying dividends
in the foreseeable future. Any future payment of dividends is
within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend
upon, among other factors, the capital requirements, operating
results and financial condition of CVG. In addition, our ability
to pay cash dividends is limited under the terms of the credit
agreement governing our senior credit facility.
28
The graph below matches Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.s
cumulative
40-month
total stockholder return on common stock with the cumulative
total returns of the NASDAQ Composite Index and the Commercial
Vehicle Supplier Composite Index. The Commercial Vehicle
Supplier Composite Index (NEW) includes five companies: Accuride
Corporation, ArvinMeritor, Inc., Cummins, Inc., Eaton Corp. and
Stoneridge, Inc. The Commercial Vehicle Supplier Composite (NEW)
includes Stoneridge, Inc., and excludes Modine Manufacturing
Co., because we believe Stoneridge, Inc. is more comparable to
us. We no longer present the Commercial Vehicle Supplier
Composite (OLD) because we believe the Commercial Vehicle
Supplier Composite (NEW) includes companies that are more
comparable to us. The graph tracks the performance of a $100
investment in our common stock and in each index (with the
reinvestment of all dividends) from August 5, 2004 to
December 31, 2007.
COMPARISON
OF 40-MONTH
CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index,
the Commercial Vehicle Supplier Composite Index (OLD)
and the Commercial Vehicle Supplier Composite Index (NEW)
|
|
* |
$100 invested on 8/5/04 in stock or index-including reinvestment
of dividends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/05/04
|
|
|
12/31/04
|
|
|
12/31/05
|
|
|
12/31/06
|
|
|
12/31/07
|
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
166.64
|
|
|
|
$
|
143.36
|
|
|
|
$
|
166.41
|
|
|
|
$
|
110.69
|
|
NASDAQ Composite
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
118.09
|
|
|
|
$
|
120.94
|
|
|
|
$
|
134.73
|
|
|
|
$
|
147.21
|
|
Commercial Vehicle Supplier Composite (OLD)
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
116.42
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.37
|
|
|
|
$
|
130.28
|
|
|
|
$
|
195.74
|
|
Commercial Vehicle Supplier Composite (NEW)
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
116.59
|
|
|
|
$
|
109.70
|
|
|
|
$
|
131.37
|
|
|
|
$
|
201.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The information in the graph and table above is not
soliciting material, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date
of this annual report, except to the extent that we specifically
incorporate such information by reference.
29
The following table sets forth information in connection with
purchases made by, or on behalf of, us or any affiliated
purchaser, of shares of our common stock during the quarterly
period ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
(d) Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or
|
|
|
Number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units)
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
Dollar Value) of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
|
(a) Total
|
|
|
(b) Average
|
|
|
Publicly
|
|
|
that May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
per Share (or
|
|
|
Plans or
|
|
|
the Plans or
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Unit)
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
Prgrams
|
|
|
Month #1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(October 1, 2007 through
October 31, 2007)
|
|
|
22,317
|
|
|
$
|
13.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month #2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(November 1, 2007 through
November 30, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month #3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(December 1, 2007 through
December 31, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We did not repurchase any of our common stock on the open market
as part of a stock repurchase program during the fourth quarter
of 2007, however, our employees surrendered 22,317 shares
of our common stock to satisfy the tax withholding obligations
on the vesting of restricted stock awards issued under our
Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.
30
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial
data regarding our business and certain industry information and
should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, and our consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Material
Events Affecting Financial Statement Comparability:
Collectively, our acquisitions of Mayflower, Monona, Cabarrus
and C.I.E.B. materially impacted our results of operations and
as a result, our consolidated financial statements for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are not comparable
to the results of the prior periods presented without
consideration of the information provided in Note 3 and
Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements contained
in Item 8 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, and Note 3 and
Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements contained
in Item 15 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
696,786
|
|
|
$
|
918,751
|
|
|
$
|
754,481
|
|
|
$
|
380,445
|
|
|
$
|
287,579
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
620,145
|
|
|
|
768,913
|
|
|
|
620,031
|
|
|
|
309,696
|
|
|
|
237,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
76,641
|
|
|
|
149,838
|
|
|
|
134,450
|
|
|
|
70,749
|
|
|
|
49,695
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
55,493
|
|
|
|
51,950
|
|
|
|
44,564
|
|
|
|
28,985
|
|
|
|
24,281
|
|
Share-based compensation expense(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
18,821
|
|
|
|
97,474
|
|
|
|
89,528
|
|
|
|
31,532
|
|
|
|
25,229
|
|
Loss (gain) on foreign currency forward contracts and other
|
|
|
9,361
|
|
|
|
(3,468
|
)
|
|
|
(3,741
|
)
|
|
|
(1,247
|
)
|
|
|
3,230
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
14,147
|
|
|
|
14,829
|
|
|
|
13,195
|
|
|
|
7,244
|
|
|
|
9,796
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
2,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(4,836
|
)
|
|
|
85,795
|
|
|
|
78,549
|
|
|
|
23,930
|
|
|
|
9,231
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
|
27,745
|
|
|
|
29,138
|
|
|
|
6,481
|
|
|
|
5,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
58,050
|
|
|
$
|
49,411
|
|
|
$
|
17,449
|
|
|
$
|
3,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per share:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.74
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.69
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
21,439
|
|
|
|
21,151
|
|
|
|
19,440
|
|
|
|
15,429
|
|
|
|
13,779
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
21,439
|
|
|
|
21,545
|
|
|
|
19,697
|
|
|
|
15,623
|
|
|
|
13,883
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of each period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital (current assets less current liabilities)
|
|
$
|
117,172
|
|
|
$
|
135,368
|
|
|
$
|
119,104
|
|
|
$
|
41,727
|
|
|
$
|
28,216
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
599,089
|
|
|
$
|
590,822
|
|
|
$
|
543,883
|
|
|
$
|
225,638
|
|
|
$
|
210,495
|
|
Total liabilities, excluding debt
|
|
$
|
174,029
|
|
|
$
|
163,803
|
|
|
$
|
150,797
|
|
|
$
|
60,667
|
|
|
$
|
48,215
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
159,725
|
|
|
$
|
162,114
|
|
|
$
|
191,009
|
|
|
$
|
53,925
|
|
|
$
|
127,474
|
|
Total stockholders investment
|
|
$
|
265,335
|
|
|
$
|
264,905
|
|
|
$
|
202,077
|
|
|
$
|
111,046
|
|
|
$
|
34,806
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(3)
|
|
$
|
27,296
|
|
|
$
|
115,910
|
|
|
$
|
105,385
|
|
|
$
|
40,389
|
|
|
$
|
30,105
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
47,575
|
|
|
$
|
36,922
|
|
|
$
|
44,156
|
|
|
$
|
34,177
|
|
|
$
|
10,442
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
$
|
(53,292
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27,625
|
)
|
|
$
|
(188,569
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,907
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,967
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
$
|
(2,394
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27,952
|
)
|
|
$
|
188,547
|
|
|
$
|
(28,427
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,761
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
16,425
|
|
|
$
|
14,983
|
|
|
$
|
12,064
|
|
|
$
|
7,567
|
|
|
$
|
8,106
|
|
Capital expenditures, net
|
|
$
|
17,274
|
|
|
$
|
22,389
|
|
|
$
|
20,669
|
|
|
$
|
8,907
|
|
|
$
|
5,967
|
|
North American Heavy-duty (Class 8) truck production
(units)(4)
|
|
|
212,000
|
|
|
|
378,000
|
|
|
|
341,000
|
|
|
|
269,000
|
|
|
|
182,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Share-based compensation expense in 2004 is related to options
issued in conjunction with our IPO that vested immediately.
Subsequent share-based compensation is recorded in selling,
general and administrative expenses. |
|
(2) |
|
Earnings (loss) per share has been calculated giving effect to
the reclassification of our outstanding classes of common stock
into one class of common stock and, in connection therewith, a
38.991-to-one stock split. |
|
(3) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is
reconciled to net income, its most directly comparable GAAP
measure, in the accompanying financial tables. Adjusted EBITDA
is defined as net earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
amortization, gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt,
restructuring charges, miscellaneous income/expenses and
cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle. In
calculating Adjusted EBITDA, we exclude the effects of
gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt, restructuring
charges, miscellaneous income/expenses and cumulative effect of
changes in accounting principles because our management believes
that some of these items may not occur in certain periods, the
amounts recognized can vary significantly from period to period
and these items do not facilitate an understanding of our
operating performance. Our management utilizes Adjusted EBITDA,
in addition to the supplemental information, as an operating
performance measure in conjunction with GAAP measures, such as
net income and gross margin calculated in conformity with GAAP. |
Our management uses Adjusted EBITDA, in addition to the
supplemental information, as an integral part of its reporting
and planning processes and as one of the primary measures to,
among other things:
(i) monitor and evaluate the performance of our business
operations;
(ii) facilitate managements internal comparisons of
our historical operating performance of our business operations;
(iii) facilitate managements external comparisons of
the results of our overall business to the historical operating
performance of other companies that may have different capital
structures and debt levels;
(iv) review and assess the operating performance of our
management team and as a measure in evaluating employee
compensation and bonuses;
(v) analyze and evaluate financial and strategic planning
decisions regarding future operating investments; and
(vi) plan for and prepare future annual operating budgets
and determine appropriate levels of operating investments.
Our management believes that Adjusted EBITDA, in addition to the
supplemental information, is useful to investors as it provides
them with disclosures of our operating results on the same basis
as that used by our management. Additionally, our management
believes that Adjusted EBITDA, in addition to the supplemental
information, provides useful information to investors about the
performance of our overall business because the
32
measure eliminates the effects of certain recurring and other
unusual or infrequent charges that are not directly attributable
to our underlying operating performance. Additionally, our
management believes that because we have historically provided a
non-GAAP financial measure in previous filings, that continuing
to include a non-GAAP measure in our filings provides
consistency in our financial reporting and continuity to
investors for comparability purposes. Accordingly, we believe
that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, when used in
conjunction with the supplemental information and GAAP financial
measures, is a useful financial analysis tool, used by our
management as described above, that can assist investors in
assessing our financial condition, operating performance and
underlying strength. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for net income prepared in
conformity with GAAP. Other companies may define Adjusted EBITDA
differently. Adjusted EBITDA, as well as the other information
in this filing, should be read in conjunction with our financial
statements and footnotes contained in the documents that we file
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
The following is a reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted
EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
58,050
|
|
|
$
|
49,411
|
|
|
$
|
17,449
|
|
|
$
|
3,964
|
|
Add (subtract):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,425
|
|
|
|
14,983
|
|
|
|
12,064
|
|
|
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
8,106
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
14,147
|
|
|
|
14,829
|
|
|
|
13,195
|
|
|
|
7,244
|
|
|
|
9,796
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
|
27,745
|
|
|
|
29,138
|
|
|
|
6,481
|
|
|
|
5,267
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
2,972
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous (income) expense
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
27,296
|
|
|
$
|
115,910
|
|
|
$
|
105,385
|
|
|
$
|
40,389
|
|
|
$
|
30,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash loss (gain) on forward exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
9,967
|
|
|
$
|
(4,203
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,793
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,290
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,230
|
|
Nonrecurring (benefit) provision for prior period debt service
|
|
$
|
(584
|
)
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Source: Americas Commercial Transportation Research Co. LLC and
ACT Publications. |
33
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
You should read the following discussion and analysis in
conjunction with the information set forth under
Item 6 Selected Financial Data and
our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included in Item 8 in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The statements in this discussion regarding industry outlook,
our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and
capital resources and other non-historical statements in this
discussion are forward-looking statements. See
Forward-Looking Information on page ii of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks
and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and
uncertainties described under Item 1A Risk
Factors. Our actual results may differ materially from
those contained in or implied by any forward-looking
statements.
Company
Overview
We are a leading supplier of fully integrated system solutions
for the global commercial vehicle market, including the
Heavy-duty (Class 8) truck market, the construction,
military, bus and agriculture market and the specialty
transportation markets. As a result of our strong leadership in
cab-related products and systems, we are positioned to benefit
from the increased focus of our customers on cab design and
comfort and convenience features to better serve their end-user,
the driver. Our products include suspension seat systems,
interior trim systems (including instrument panels, door panels,
headliners, cabinetry and floor systems), cab structures and
components, mirrors, wiper systems, electronic wire harness
assemblies and controls and switches specifically designed for
applications in commercial vehicles.
We are differentiated from suppliers to the automotive industry
by our ability to manufacture low volume customized products on
a sequenced basis to meet the requirements of our customers. We
believe that we have the number one or two position in most of
our major markets and that we are the only supplier in the North
American commercial vehicle market that can offer complete cab
systems including cab body assemblies, sleeper boxes, seats,
interior trim, flooring, wire harnesses, panel assemblies and
other structural components. We believe our products are used by
virtually every major North American heavy truck commercial
vehicle OEM, which we believe creates an opportunity to
cross-sell our products and offer a fully integrated system
solution.
Demand for our products is generally dependent on the number of
new heavy truck commercial vehicles manufactured in North
America, which in turn is a function of general economic
conditions, interest rates, changes in governmental regulations,
consumer spending, fuel costs and our customers inventory
levels and production rates. New heavy truck commercial vehicle
demand has historically been cyclical and is particularly
sensitive to the industrial sector of the economy, which
generates a significant portion of the freight tonnage hauled by
commercial vehicles. Production of heavy truck commercial
vehicles in North America initially peaked in 1999 and
experienced a downturn from 2000 to 2003 that was due to a weak
economy, an oversupply of new and used vehicle inventory and
lower spending on heavy truck commercial vehicles and equipment.
Demand for commercial vehicles improved in 2006 due to broad
economic recovery in North America, corresponding growth in the
movement of goods, the growing need to replace aging truck
fleets and OEMs received larger than expected pre-orders in
anticipation of the new EPA emissions standards becoming
effective in 2007. During 2007, the demand for North American
Class 8 heavy trucks experienced a downturn as a result of
pre-orders in 2006 and general weakness in the North American
economy and corresponding decline in the need for commercial
vehicles to haul freight tonnage in North America.
In 2007, approximately 41% of our revenue was generated from
sales to North American heavy-duty truck OEMs. Our remaining
revenue in 2007 was primarily derived from sales to OEMs in the
global construction market, the aftermarket, OEM service
organizations and other commercial vehicle and specialty
markets. Demand for our products is also driven to a significant
degree by preferences of the end-user of the commercial vehicle,
particularly with respect to Heavy-duty
(Class 8) trucks. Unlike the automotive industry,
commercial vehicle OEMs generally afford the ultimate end-user
the ability to specify many of the component parts that will be
used to manufacture the commercial vehicle, including a wide
variety of cab interior styles and colors, the brand and type of
seats, type of seat fabric and color and specific mirror
styling. In addition, certain of our products are only utilized
in Heavy-duty (Class 8) trucks, such as our storage
systems, sleeper boxes, sleeper bunks and privacy curtains, and,
as a result, changes in demand for Heavy-duty
(Class 8) trucks or the mix of options on a vehicle
can have a greater impact on
34
our business than changes in the overall demand for commercial
vehicles. To the extent that demand increases for higher content
vehicles, our revenues and gross profit will be positively
impacted.
Demand for our products is also dependent on the overall vehicle
demand for new commercial vehicles in the global construction
equipment market and generally follows certain economic
conditions around the world. Within the construction market,
there are two classes of construction equipment, the
medium/heavy equipment market (weighing over 12 metric tons) and
the light construction equipment market (weighing below 12
metric tons). Demand in the medium/heavy construction equipment
market is typically related to the level of larger scale
infrastructure development projects such as highways, dams,
harbors, hospitals, airports and industrial development as well
as activity in the mining, forestry and other raw material based
industries. Demand in the light construction equipment market is
typically related to certain economic conditions such as the
level of housing construction and other smaller-scale
developments and projects. Our products are primarily used in
the medium/heavy construction equipment markets.
Along with North America, we have operations in Europe, China,
Australia and Mexico. Our operating results are, therefore,
impacted by exchange rate fluctuations to the extent we are
unable to match revenues received in such currencies with costs
incurred in such currencies. Strengthening of these foreign
currencies as compared to the U.S. dollar resulted in an
approximate $11.0 million increase in our revenues in 2007
as compared to 2006 and an approximate $3.0 million
increase in 2006 as compared to 2005. Because our costs were
generally impacted to the same degree as our revenue, this
exchange rate fluctuation did not have a material impact on our
net income in 2007 as compared to 2006 and 2006 compared to 2005.
We continuously seek ways to improve our operating performance
by lowering costs. These efforts include, but are not limited
to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
sourcing efforts in Europe and Asia;
|
|
|
|
consolidating our supply base to improve purchasing leverage;
|
|
|
|
eliminating excess production capacity through the closure and
consolidation of manufacturing or assembly facilities; and
|
|
|
|
implementing Lean Manufacturing and Total Quality Production
System (TQPS) initiatives to improve operating
efficiency and product quality.
|
Although OEM demand for our products is directly correlated with
new vehicle production, we also have the opportunity to grow
through increasing our product content per vehicle through cross
selling and bundling of products. We generally compete for new
business at the beginning of the development of a new vehicle
platform and upon the redesign of existing programs. New
platform development generally begins at least one to three
years before the marketing of such models by our customers.
Contract durations for commercial vehicle products generally
extend for the entire life of the platform, which is typically
five to seven years.
In sourcing products for a specific platform, the customer
generally develops a proposed production timetable, including
current volume and option mix estimates based on their own
assumptions, and then sources business with the supplier
pursuant to written contracts, purchase orders or other firm
commitments in terms of price, quality, technology and delivery.
In general, these contracts, purchase orders and commitments
provide that the customer can terminate if a supplier does not
meet specified quality and delivery requirements and, in many
cases, they provide that the price will decrease over the
proposed production timetable. Awarded business generally covers
the supply of all or a portion of a customers production
and service requirements for a particular product program rather
than the supply of a specific quantity of products. Accordingly,
in estimating awarded business over the life of a contract or
other commitment, a supplier must make various assumptions as to
the estimated number of vehicles expected to be produced, the
timing of that production, mix of options on the vehicles
produced and pricing of the products being supplied. The actual
production volumes and option mix of vehicles produced by
customers depend on a number of factors that are beyond a
suppliers control.
35
Recent
Acquisitions
In October 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock
of PEKM Kabeltechnik s.r.o. (PEKM), an electronic
wire harness manufacturer primarily for the commercial truck
market, with facilities in the Czech Republic and the Ukraine.
The PEKM acquisition was financed with borrowings under our
revolving credit facility. The operating results of PEKM have
been included in our 2007 consolidated financial statements
since the date of acquisition.
In October 2007, we acquired the heavy-gauge thermoforming and
injection molding assets of the Fabrication Division of Gage
Industries, Inc. (Gage), with facilities in Tigard
and Lake Oswego, Oregon. The Gage acquisition was financed with
borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The operating
results of Gage have been included in our 2007 consolidated
financial statements since the date of acquisition.
In December 2007, we acquired substantially all of the assets of
Short Bark Industries, LLC (SBI), a supplier of seat
covers and various
cut-and-sew
trim products, with facilities in Tellico Plains and Pikeville,
Tennessee The SBI acquisition was financed with borrowings under
our revolving credit facility. The operating results of SBI have
been included in our 2007 consolidated financial statements
since the date of acquisition.
See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements
contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for detailed information on these transactions.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (U.S. GAAP). For a
comprehensive discussion of our accounting policies, see
Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 8 in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions,
particularly relating to revenue recognition and sales
commitments, provision for income taxes, restructuring and
impairment charges and litigation and contingencies may have a
material impact on our financial statements, and are discussed
in detail throughout our analysis of our results of operations.
In addition to evaluating estimates relating to the items
discussed above, we also consider other estimates, including,
but not limited to, those related to allowance for doubtful
accounts, defined benefit pension plan assumptions, uncertain
tax positions and goodwill and other intangible assets. We base
our estimates on historical experience and various other
assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying value of assets, liabilities and
equity that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
results and outcomes could differ materially from these
estimates and assumptions. See Item 1A Risk
Factors for additional information regarding risk factors
that may impact our estimates.
We apply the following critical accounting polices in the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition and Sales Commitments We
recognize revenue in accordance with the SECs Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue
Recognition in Financial Statements, and
SAB No. 104, Revenue Recognition, and other
authoritative accounting literature. These pronouncements
generally require that we recognize revenue when
(1) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered,
(2) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
(3) there is a fixed or determinable price and
(4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Our products are
generally shipped from our facilities to our customers, which is
when legal title passes to the customer for substantially all of
our revenues. We enter into agreements with our customers at the
beginning of a given platforms life to supply products for
that platform. Once we enter into such agreements, fulfillment
of our purchasing requirements is our obligation for the entire
production life of the platform, with terms generally ranging
from five to seven years, and we have no provisions to terminate
such contracts.
Provisions for anticipated contract losses are recognized at the
time they become evident. In certain instances, we may be
committed under existing agreements to supply product to our
customers at selling prices that are not
36
sufficient to cover the cost to produce such product. In such
situations, we record a provision for the estimated future
amount of such losses. Such losses are recognized at the time
that the loss is probable and reasonably estimable and are
recorded at the minimum amount necessary to fulfill our
obligations to our customers. We had a provision for anticipated
contract losses of $0.4 million as of December 31,
2007. We had no such provision as of December 31, 2006 and
$0.1 million at December 31, 2005.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill
represents the excess of acquisition purchase price over the
fair value of net assets acquired. We review goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually in
the second fiscal quarter and whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible
Assets. We review indefinite and definite-lived intangible
assets in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 142 and SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The
provisions of SFAS No. 142 require that a two-step
impairment test be performed on goodwill. In the first step, we
compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying
value. Our reporting unit is consistent with the reportable
segment identified in Note 10 to our consolidated financial
statements contained in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007. If the fair value of
the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets
assigned to that unit, goodwill is considered not impaired and
we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying
value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds
the fair value of the reporting unit, then we must perform the
second step of the impairment test in order to determine the
implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill. If the
carrying value of a reporting units goodwill exceeds its
implied fair value, then we would record an impairment loss
equal to the difference. SFAS No. 142 also requires
that the fair value of the purchased intangible assets with
indefinite lives be estimated and compared to the carrying
value. We estimate the fair value of these intangible assets
using an income approach. We recognize an impairment loss when
the estimated fair value of the intangible asset is less than
the carrying value. In this regard, our management considers the
following indicators in determining if events or changes in
circumstances have occurred indicating that the recoverability
of the carrying amount of indefinite-lived and amortizing
intangible assets should be assessed: (1) a significant
decrease in the market value of an asset; (2) a significant
change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used or a
significant physical change in an asset; (3) a significant
adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that
could affect the value of an asset or an adverse action or
assessment by a regulator; (4) an accumulation of costs
significantly in excess of the amount originally expected to
acquire or construct an asset; and (5) a current period
operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating
or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that
demonstrates continuing losses associated with an asset used for
the purpose of producing revenue. Our annual goodwill analysis
was performed during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and did
not result in an impairment charge.
Annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances change,
a determination is made by management, in accordance with
SFAS No. 144 to ascertain whether property and
equipment and certain definite-lived intangibles have been
impaired based on the sum of expected future undiscounted cash
flows from operating activities. If the estimated net cash flows
are less than the carrying amount of such assets, we will
recognize an impairment loss in an amount necessary to write
down the assets to fair value as determined from expected future
discounted cash flows. In accordance with SFAS 142, we test
intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill for
impairment annually or when conditions indicate impairment may
have occurred.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in
nature and involves the use of significant estimates and
assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue
growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected
future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic
and market conditions and determination of appropriate market
comparables. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we
believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and
inherently uncertain. The valuation approaches we use include
the Income Approach (the Discounted Cash Flow Method) and the
Market Approach (the Guideline Company and Transaction Methods)
to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit; earnings are
emphasized in the Discounted Cash Flow, Guideline Company, and
the Transaction Methods. In addition, these methods utilize
market data in the derivation of a value estimate and are
forward-looking in nature. The Discounted Cash Flow Method
utilizes a market-derived rate of return to discount anticipated
performance, while the Guideline Company Method and the
37
Transaction Method incorporate multiples that are based on the
markets assessment of future performance. Actual future
results may differ materially from those estimates.
Intangible
Assets Indefinite-Lived
Basis for
Accounting Treatment
Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of customer
relationships acquired in the 2005 acquisitions of Mayflower and
Monona. We have accounted for these customer relationships as
indefinite-lived intangible assets, which we believe is
appropriate based upon the following circumstances and
conditions under which we operate:
Sourcing,
Barriers to Entry and Competitor Risks
The customer sourcing decision for the Mayflower and Monona
businesses is heavily predicated on price, quality, delivery and
the overall customer relationship. Absent a significant change
in any or all of these factors, it is unlikely that a customer
would source production to an alternate supplier. In addition,
the factors listed below impose a high barrier for new
competitors to enter into this industry. Historical experience
indicates that Mayflower and Monona have not lost any primary
customers
and/or
relationships due to these factors and such loss is not
anticipated in the foreseeable future for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Costs associated with setting up a new production line,
including tooling costs, are typically cost prohibitive in a
competitive pricing environment;
|
|
|
|
The risk associated with potential production delays and a
disruption to the supply chain typically outweighs any potential
economic benefit;
|
|
|
|
Significant initial outlays of capital and institutional
production knowledge represent a significant barrier to entry.
Due to the asset-intensive nature of the businesses, a new
competitor would require a substantial amount of initial capital;
|
|
|
|
Changeover costs are high both from an economic and risk
standpoint;
|
|
|
|
The highly complex nature of successfully producing electronic
wiring harnesses and complete cab structures in accordance with
OEM quality standards makes it difficult for a competitor to
enter the business; and
|
|
|
|
There is significant risk in operating the businesses as a
result of the highly customized nature of the business. For
example, production runs in the commercial vehicle business are
significantly smaller and are more build to order in
nature which requires the systems, expertise, equipment and
logistics in order to be successful.
|
These costs and risks are the primary prohibiting factors which
preclude our customers from sourcing their business elsewhere at
any given time.
Duration
and Strength of Existing Customer Relationships/Concentrations
of Revenue
Mayflower and Monona have long-standing relationships with their
existing customers and have experienced de minimis historical
attrition. These relationships have endured over time and,
accordingly, an assumption of prospective attrition is
inconsistent with this historical experience and
managements expectations. Both Mayflower and Monona have a
limited customer base, consisting of three primary customers,
that has existed for many years, and we had pre-existing
long-standing relationships with the same primary customers
prior to the acquisitions of Mayflower and Monona, which in most
cases have exceeded a period of 40 years. We believe the
addition of Mayflower and Monona further strengthens our
existing customer relationships with such customers.
Specifically:
Mayflower and Mononas relationships with their
customers key decision-making personnel are mature and
stable.
38
|
|
|
|
|
Mayflowers and Mononas customers typically make
purchasing decisions through a team approach versus a single
decision maker. Mayflower and Monona have historically
maintained strong relationships with individuals at all levels
of the decision making process including the engineering,
operations and purchasing functions in order to successfully
minimize the impact of any employee turnover at the customer
level.
|
The top three customers of Mayflower and Monona have been
established customers for a substantial period of time.
|
|
|
|
|
Mayflower has had relationships with Volvo/Mack, Freightliner
and International since 1965, 1997 and 2001, respectively. We
and/or our
predecessor entities, had pre-existing relationships with these
same customers since 1949, 1954 and 1950, respectively. These
customers comprised approximately 89%, 88% and 85% of
Mayflowers revenues for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
Monona has had relationships with Deere & Co.,
Caterpillar and Oshkosh since 1969, 1970 and 1985, respectively.
We and/or
our predecessor entities, had pre-existing relationships with
these same customers since 1987, 1958 and 1950, respectively.
These customers comprised approximately 84%, 85% and 88% of
Mononas revenues for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
|
Valuation
Methodology
For valuation purposes, the income approach using the discounted
cash flow method was employed for the purpose of evaluating the
Mayflower and Monona customer relationship intangible assets.
Under this approach, we determined that the fair value of the
Mayflower and Monona customer relationship intangible assets at
their dates of acquisition was $45.9 million and
$28.9 million, respectively.
Significant assumptions used in the valuation and determination
of an indefinite useful life for these customer relationship
intangible assets included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The revenue projections that we relied upon to substantiate the
economic consideration paid for the businesses is almost
exclusively tied to the existing customer base. With regard to
the valuation process, we projected less than 1% of total
revenue in 2005 and 2006 to be lost due to core customer
attrition and no core customer attrition thereafter.
|
|
|
|
Contributory asset charges were deducted for assets that
contribute to income generation including: (i) net working
capital; (ii) personal property; (iii) real property;
(iv) tradename and trademarks; and (v) an assembled
workforce.
|
|
|
|
The cash flows associated with the customer relationships
acquired in the Mayflower and Monona transactions were
discounted at a rate of return of 25.0% and 29.5%, respectively,
which is approximately equal to the equity rate of return.
|
Intangible
Asset Impairment Accounting Treatment
If Mayflower
and/or
Monona were to prospectively lose any of their customers, in
accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 16 and 17 of
SFAS No. 142, we would perform an intangible asset
impairment test to determine the impact of the loss on the
customer relationship intangible asset and if impairment was
indicated, we would record an impairment loss in our
consolidated statement of operations.
Accounting for Income Taxes As part of the
process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we
are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the
jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, tax expense
includes the impact of differing treatment of items for tax and
accounting purposes which result in deferred tax assets and
liabilities which are included in our consolidated balance
sheet. To the extent that recovery of deferred tax assets is not
likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Significant
judgment is required in determining our provision for income
taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation
allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. As of
December 31, 2007, we determined that a valuation allowance
of $1.3 million was needed against our deferred tax assets.
This valuation allowance is related to the inability to use
certain foreign tax credits and state operating losses that are
being carried forward prior to their expiration. In the event
that our actual results differ from our estimates or we adjust
these estimates in future periods, the effects of these
adjustments could
39
materially impact our financial position and results of
operations. The net deferred tax liability as of
December 31, 2007 was $14.1 million. We adopted
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, (FIN 48) in the first quarter
2007. The adoption of this interpretation changed the manner in
which we evaluate recognition and measurement of uncertain tax
positions. See Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements in Note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements for further information regarding the
adoption of this authoritative literature.
Warranties We are subjected to warranty
claims for products that fail to perform as expected due to
design or manufacturing deficiencies. Customers continue to
require their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their
products and bear the cost of repair or replacement of such
products. Depending on the terms under which we supplied
products to our customers, a customer may hold us responsible
for some or all of the repair or replacement costs of defective
products, when the product supplied did not perform as
represented. Our policy is to reserve for estimated future
customer warranty costs based on historical trends and current
economic factors. The amount of such estimates for warranty
provisions was approximately $4.0 million,
$5.2 million and $7.1 million at December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
Plans We sponsor pension and other
post-retirement benefit plans that cover certain hourly and
salaried employees in the United States and United Kingdom. Our
policy is to make annual contributions to the plans to fund the
normal cost as required by local regulations. In addition, we
have an other post-retirement benefit plan for certain
U.S. operations, retirees and their dependents.
Our
Assumptions
The determination of pension and other post-retirement benefit
plan obligations and related expenses requires the use of
assumptions to estimate the amount of the benefits that
employees earn while working, as well as the present value of
those benefits. Our assumptions are determined based on current
market conditions, historical information and consultation with
and input from our actuaries. Due to the significant management
judgment involved, our assumptions could have a material impact
on the measurement of our pension and other post-retirement
benefit expenses and obligations.
Significant assumptions used to measure our annual pension and
other post-retirement benefit expenses include:
|
|
|
|
|
discount rate;
|
|
|
|
expected return on plan assets; and
|
|
|
|
health care cost trend rates.
|
Discount Rate The discount rate represents
the interest rate that should be used to determine the present
value of future cash flows currently expected to be required to
settle the pension and other post-retirement benefit
obligations. In estimating this rate, we consider rates of
return on high quality fixed-income investments included in
various published bond indexes. We consider the Moodys Aa
Corporate Bond Index and the Barclays Capital AA Rated
Sterling Bond Index in the determination of the appropriate
discount rate assumptions. The weighted average rate we used to
measure our pension obligation as of December 31, 2007 was
6.0% for the U.S. and 5.9% for the non-U.S. pension plans.
Expected Long-Term Rate of Return The
expected return on pension plan assets is based on our
historical experience, our pension plan investment strategy and
our expectations for long-term rates of return. Our pension plan
investment strategy is reviewed annually and is established
based upon plan liabilities, an evaluation of market conditions,
tolerance for risk and cash requirements for benefit payments.
We use a third-party advisor to assist us in determining our
investment allocation and modeling our long-term rate of return
assumptions. For 2007 and 2006, we assumed an expected long-term
rate of return on plan assets of 7.5% and 8.5%, respectively,
for the U.S. pension plans and 6.0% and 6.0%, respectively,
for the
non-U.S. pension
plans.
40
Changes in the discount rate and expected long-term rate of
return on plan assets within the range indicated below would
have had the following impact on 2007 pension and other
post-retirement benefits results (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Percentage
|
|
|
1 Percentage
|
|
|
|
Point Increase
|
|
|
Point Decrease
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase due to change in assumptions used to
determine net periodic benefit costs for the year ended
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
$
|
(289
|
)
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
|
$
|
(572
|
)
|
|
$
|
572
|
|
(Decrease) increase due to change in assumptions used to
determine benefit obligations for the year ended
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
$
|
(11,849
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,291
|
|
Health Care Cost Trend Rates The health care
cost trend rates represent the annual rates of change in the
cost of health care benefits based on estimates of health care
inflation, changes in health care utilization or delivery
patterns, technological advances and changes in the health
status of the plan participants. For measurement purposes, a
10.0% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered
health care benefits was assumed for 2007 and 2006. The rate was
assumed to decrease gradually to 5.5% through 2013 and remain
constant thereafter. Assumed health care cost trend rates can
have a significant effect on the amounts reported for other
post-retirement benefit plans.
Differences in the ultimate health care cost trend rates within
the range indicated below would have had the following impact on
2007 other post-retirement benefit results (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Percentage
|
|
|
1 Percentage Point
|
|
|
|
Point Increase
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) from change in health care cost trend rates
Other post-retirement benefit expense
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
Other post-retirement benefit liability
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 8 in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for a full description of recently issued
and/or
adopted accounting pronouncements.
41
Results
of Operations
The table below sets forth certain operating data expressed as a
percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
89.0
|
|
|
|
83.7
|
|
|
|
82.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2006
Revenues. Revenues decreased
$222.0 million, or 24.2%, to $696.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $918.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006. This decrease resulted
primarily from:
|
|
|
|
|
a 43.9% decrease in North American Heavy-duty
(Class 8) truck production, fluctuations in production
levels for other North American end markets and net new business
awards resulted in approximately $270.4 million of
decreased revenues;
|
The decrease was partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
increased acquisition related revenue of approximately
$29.0 million from the full year impact of the acquisition
of C.I.E.B. and the partial year impact of PEKM and Gage;
|
|
|
|
an increase in production levels, fluctuations in content and
net new business awards for our European, Australian and Asian
markets of approximately $8.4 million;
|
|
|
|
favorable foreign exchange fluctuations and adjustments of
approximately $11.0 million.
|
Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased
$73.2 million, or 48.9%, to $76.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007 from $149.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006. As a percentage of revenues,
gross profit decreased to 11.0% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from 16.3% for the year ended
December 31, 2006. This decrease resulted primarily from
the our inability to reduce fixed costs proportionate to the
decrease in revenues from the prior period. We continued to seek
material cost reductions, labor efficiencies and general
operating cost reductions to generate additional profits during
the year ended December 31, 2007.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $3.5 million, or 6.8%, to
$55.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
from $52.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2006. The increase resulted primarily from higher wages and
benefits, travel expenses, currency fluctuations as well as
increased stock compensation expense, partially offset by
reduced incentive compensation expense as compared to the prior
year.
Amortization Expense. Amortization expense
increased to approximately $0.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from approximately $0.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was
primarily the result of breakout of definite-lived intangible
assets for the C.I.E.B. and PEKM acquisitions.
42
Restructuring Charges. In 2007, we approved
the closure of our Seattle, Washington facility. In connection
with the closure we incurred restructuring charges of
approximately $1.4 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Other Expense (Income). We use forward
exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency transaction
exposures of our United Kingdom operations. We estimate our
projected revenues in certain foreign currencies or locations
and will hedge a portion of the anticipated long or short
position. We have not designated any of our forward exchange
contracts as cash flow hedges, electing instead to
mark-to-market the contracts and record the fair value of the
contracts on our consolidated balance sheets, with the
offsetting noncash gain or loss recorded in our consolidated
statement of operations. The $9.4 million expense for the
year ended December 31, 2007 and the $3.5 million gain
for the year ended December 31, 2006 are primarily related
to the noncash change in value of the forward exchange contracts
in existence at the end of each period.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$0.7 million to $14.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $14.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily the
result of lower average outstanding debt balances.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. In June
2007, we repaid our foreign denominated term loan in full. In
connection with this loan repayment, we wrote off a
proportionate amount of our debt financing costs of
approximately $0.1 million. In connection with our
June 30, 2006 repayment of approximately $25.0 million
of our U.S. Dollar denominated term loan, we wrote off a
proportionate amount of our debt financing costs of
approximately $0.3 million.
(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes. Our
effective tax rate during the year ended December 31, 2007
was 32.8% compared to 32.3% for 2006. Provision for income taxes
decreased $29.3 million to a benefit of $1.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to an income
tax provision of $27.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The increase in effective rate year over
year can be primarily attributed to the decrease in income
before taxes and release of certain tax reserves.
Net (Loss) Income. Net income decreased
$61.4 million to a loss of $3.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007, compared to net income of
$58.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006,
primarily as a result of the factors discussed above.
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2005
Revenues. Revenues increased
$164.3 million, or 21.8%, to $918.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006 from $754.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005. This increase resulted
primarily from:
|
|
|
|
|
increased acquisition related revenue of approximately
$77.0 million from the full year impact of the acquisitions
of Mayflower, Monona, Cabarrus and the partial year impact of
C.I.E.B.;
|
|
|
|
a 10.9% increase in North American Heavy-duty
(Class 8) truck production, fluctuations in production
levels for other North American end markets and net new business
awards resulted in approximately $88.0 million of increased
revenues;
|
|
|
|
an increase in production levels, fluctuations in content and
net new business awards for our European, Australian and Asian
markets of approximately $2.5 million;
|
|
|
|
unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations and adjustments of
approximately $3 million.
|
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased
$15.3 million, or 11.4%, to $149.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006 from $134.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005. As a percentage of
revenues, gross profit decreased to 16.3% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from 17.8% for the year ended
December 31, 2005. This decrease resulted primarily from
the result of various raw material cost increases as well as
certain operational and other one-time events during the year.
We continued to seek material cost reductions, labor
efficiencies and general operating cost reductions to generate
additional profits during the year ended December 31, 2006.
43
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $7.4 million, or 16.6%, to
$52.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
from $44.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2005. This increase resulted primarily from the full year impact
of the acquisitions of Mayflower, Monona and Cabarrus during
2005 as well as increases in wages and the cost of adopting
FAS 123(R) during the year ended December 31, 2006.
Amortization Expense. Amortization expense
increased to approximately $414 thousand for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from approximately $358 thousand for the
year ended December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily
the result of the full year impact of the Mayflower and Monona
acquisitions.
Other (Income). We use forward exchange
contracts to hedge foreign currency transaction exposures of our
United Kingdom operations. We estimate our projected revenues in
certain foreign currencies or locations and will hedge a portion
of the anticipated long or short position. We have not
designated any of our forward exchange contracts as cash flow
hedges, electing instead to mark-to-market the contracts and
record the fair value of the contracts on our consolidated
balance sheets, with the offsetting noncash gain or loss
recorded in our consolidated statement of operations. The
$3.5 million gain for the year ended December 31, 2006
and the $3.7 million gain for the year ended
December 31, 2005 are primarily related to the noncash
change in value of the forward exchange contracts in existence
at the end of each period.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
$1.6 million to $14.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from $13.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily the
result of higher average interest rates during the year.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. In 2006,
we repaid approximately $25.0 million of our
U.S. dollar denominated term loan. In connection with this
loan repayment, approximately $0.3 million of deferred fees
were written off. In 2005, as part of our 2005 issuance of
8.0% senior notes due 2013, we amended our existing senior
credit agreement and wrote off approximately $1.5 million
of deferred fees.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax
rate during the year ended December 31, 2006 was 32.3%
compared to 37.1% for 2005. Provision for income taxes decreased
$1.4 million to $27.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006, compared to an income tax provision of
$29.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The decrease in effective rate year over year can be primarily
attributed to the tax planning initiatives taken during 2006
which favorably impacted tax credits and provision rates.
Net Income. Net income increased
$8.7 million to $58.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006, compared to $49.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005, primarily as a result of the
factors discussed above.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
Flows
For the year ended December 31, 2007, cash provided by
operations was approximately $47.6 million, compared to
$36.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2006.
This increase was primarily the result of the change in accounts
receivable during the year. Cash provided by operations in the
year ended December 31, 2005 was $44.2 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was approximately
$53.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
compared to $27.6 million in the year ended
December 31, 2006 and $188.6 million in the year ended
December 31, 2005. The amounts used in the year ended
December 31, 2007 primarily reflect capital expenditure
purchases related to upgrades, replacements or new equipment,
machinery and tooling as well as the acquisitions of PEKM, Gage
and SBI. The amounts used in the year December 31, 2006
primarily reflect capital expenditure purchases and the
acquisition of C.I.E.B.. The amounts used in the year ended
December 31, 2005 primarily reflect capital expenditure
purchases and the acquisitions of Mayflower, Monona and Cabarrus.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled approximately
$2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to $28.0 million in the year ended
December 31, 2006 and net cash provided by of
$188.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2005.
The net cash used in financing activities in the year ended
December 31, 2007 was
44
primarily related to the repayment of our foreign denominated
term loan. The net cash used in financing activities for
December 31, 2006, was primarily related to our repayment
of our U.S. dollar denominated term loan and the net cash
provided by financial activities for December 31, 2005 was
primarily related to the issuance of our 8.0% senior notes.
Debt
and Credit Facilities
As of December 31, 2007, we had an aggregate of
$159.7 million of outstanding indebtedness excluding
$1.8 million of outstanding letters of credit under various
financing arrangements and an additional $81.8 million of
borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility. We were
in compliance with all of our respective financial covenants
under our debt and senior credit facility as of
December 31, 2007. The indebtedness consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
$9.5 million under our revolving credit facility and
$0.2 million of capital lease obligations. The weighted
average rate on these borrowings, for the year ended
December 31, 2007, was approximately 8.5% with respect to
the revolving borrowings and;
|
|
|
|
$150 million of 8.0% senior notes due 2013.
|
On June 30, 2006, we repaid approximately
$25.0 million of our U.S. dollar denominated term
loan. The repayment of the term loan reduced the principal
amount of the term loan from approximately $40 million to
$15 million. In connection with this loan repayment,
approximately $0.3 million of deferred fees, representing a
proportionate amount of total deferred fees, were expensed as a
loss on early extinguishment of debt.
On June 29, 2007, we repaid our foreign denominated term
loan in full. In connection with this loan repayment,
approximately $0.1 million of deferred fees, representing a
proportionate amount of total deferred fees, were expensed as a
loss on early extinguishment of debt.
On August 16, 2007, we entered into an Amendment and Waiver
Letter to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the
Amendment and Waiver Letter). Pursuant to the terms
of the Amendment and Waiver Letter, the lenders consented to
increase the size of permitted acquisitions to $40 million
per fiscal year and waived any default or event of default in
connection with intercompany loans, contributions to capital,
investments in capital stock or mixed stock and indebtedness
certificates provided in connection with permitted acquisitions.
On September 28, 2007, we entered into the Tenth Amendment
to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the Tenth
Amendment). Pursuant to the terms of the Tenth Amendment,
the lenders consented to various amendments, including but not
limited to, changes to reporting requirements and financial
ratios, which included the fixed charge coverage ratio and the
maximum ratio of total indebtedness. Based on the provisions of
AICPAs Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 98-14,
Debtors Accounting for the Changes in Line-of-Credit or
Revolving-Debt Arrangements, approximately $0.1 million
third party fees relating to the credit agreement were
capitalized and are being amortized over the remaining life of
the senior credit agreement.
On March 11, 2008, we entered into the Eleventh Amendment
to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the
Eleventh Amendment). Pursuant to the terms of the
Eleventh Amendment, the banks party thereto consented to various
amendments to the senior credit agreement, including but not
limited to: (i) amendments to the fixed charge ratio and
the leverage ratio to provide the Company increased flexibility
in the near future; (ii) an amendment to the applicable
margin pricing grid to include increased rates for prime rate
and LIBOR borrowings when the Companys leverage ratio is
equal to or greater than 4.0x; (iii) a reduction in the
size of the revolving credit facility from $100 million to
$50 million, subject to increases to $75 million and
then to $100 million upon satisfaction of certain
conditions, including meeting certain financial covenant
thresholds; (iv) increases in certain baskets in the
indebtedness, asset disposition, investment and lien covenants
contained in the senior credit agreement; and (v) an
amendment to permit proposed future tax planning.
The revolving credit facility is available until
January 31, 2010. Based on the provisions of
EITF 98-14
and the provisions of EITF Issue
No. 96-19,
Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of
Debt Instruments, approximately $3.9 million third
party fees relating to the senior credit agreement and
8.0% senior notes due 2013 were capitalized at
December 31, 2007 and are being amortized over the life of
the senior credit facility.
45
Under the terms of our senior credit facility, as amended by the
Eleventh Amendment, availability under the revolving credit
facility is subject to the lesser of (i) a borrowing base
that is equal to the sum of (a) 80% of eligible accounts
receivable plus (b) 50% of eligible inventory; or
(ii) $50.0 million; provided, that the
$50.0 million cap is subject to increase to
$75.0 million and then $100.0 million upon
satisfaction of certain financial covenant tests. Borrowings
under the senior credit agreement bear interest at a floating
rate, which can be either the prime rate or LIBOR plus the
applicable margin to the prime rate and LIBOR borrowings based
on our leverage ratio. The senior credit agreement contains
various financial covenants, including, a limitation on the
amount of capital expenditures of not more than
$40.0 million in any fiscal year, a minimum ratio of EBITDA
to cash interest expense, a fixed charge coverage ratio and a
maximum ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA. The EBITDA to
cash interest expense ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio and the
maximum ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA for the
12 months then ended, as measured at the end of each fiscal
quarter is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter(s) Ending
|
|
EBITDA to Cash Interest Expense Ratio
|
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
|
2.50 to 1.00
|
|
03/31/2008
|
|
|
2.00 to 1.00
|
|
06/30/2008 and 09/30/2008
|
|
|
2.25 to 1.00
|
|
12/31/2008 and each fiscal quarter thereafter
|
|
|
2.50 to 1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter(s) Ending
|
|
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
|
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
|
1.10 to 1.00
|
|
03/31/2008
|
|
|
.80 to 1.00
|
|
06/30/2008
|
|
|
.85 to 1.00
|
|
09/30/2008, 12/31/2008 and 03/31/2009
|
|
|
.90 to 1.00
|
|
6/30/2009
|
|
|
1.00 to 1.00
|
|
9/30/2009
|
|
|
1.15 to 1.00
|
|
12/31/2009 and each fiscal quarter thereafter
|
|
|
1.25 to 1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter(s) Ending
|
|
Maximum Ratio of Total Indebtedness
|
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
|
4.75 to 1.00
|
|
03/31/2008
|
|
|
6.10 to 1.00
|
|
06/30/2008
|
|
|
5.65 to 1.00
|
|
09/30/2008
|
|
|
5.15 to 1.00
|
|
12/31/2008
|
|
|
4.75 to 1.00
|
|
03/31/2009
|
|
|
4.50 to 1.00
|
|
06/30/2009
|
|
|
4.00 to 1.00
|
|
09/30/2009
|
|
|
3.50 to 1.00
|
|
12/31/2009 and each fiscal quarter thereafter
|
|
|
3.00 to 1.00
|
|
The senior credit agreement also contains covenants restricting
certain corporate actions, including asset dispositions,
acquisitions, dividends, change of control, incurring
indebtedness, making loans and investments and transactions with
affiliates. If we do not comply with such covenants or satisfy
such ratios, our lenders could declare a default under the
senior credit agreement, and our indebtedness thereunder could
be declared immediately due and payable. The senior credit
agreement is collateralized by substantially all of our assets
and the assets of our subsidiaries party to the financing,
except that the assets of our foreign subsidiaries party to this
financing only secure foreign borrowings. The senior credit
agreement also contains customary events of default.
The 8.0% senior notes due 2013 are senior unsecured
obligations and rank pari passu in right of payment to
all of our existing and future senior indebtedness and are
effectively subordinated to our existing and future secured
obligations. The 8.0% senior notes due 2013 are guaranteed
by all of our domestic subsidiaries.
The indenture governing the 8.0% senior notes due 2013
contain covenants that limit, among other things, additional
indebtedness, issuance of preferred stock, dividends,
repurchases of capital stock or subordinated
46
indebtedness, investments, liens, restrictions on the ability of
our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us, sales of assets,
sale/leaseback transactions, mergers and transactions with
affiliates. Upon a change of control, each holder shall have the
right to require that we purchase such holders securities
at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the principal
amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
repurchase. The indenture governing the 8.0% senior notes
due 2013 also contains customary events of default.
We believe that cash flow from operating activities together
with available borrowings under our senior credit facility will
be sufficient to fund currently anticipated working capital,
planned capital spending and debt service requirements for at
least the next twelve months. Capital expenditures for 2008 are
expected to be approximately $20.0 million.
Contractual
Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table reflects our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
159,725
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
9,608
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
Estimated interest payments
|
|
|
43,228
|
|
|
|
12,819
|
|
|
|
12,409
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
60,210
|
|
|
|
10,227
|
|
|
|
15,332
|
|
|
|
11,462
|
|
|
|
23,189
|
|
Pension and other post-retirement funding
|
|
|
37,613
|
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
|
5,966
|
|
|
|
6,958
|
|
|
|
22,003
|
|
FIN 48 obligations
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
301,802
|
|
|
$
|
26,874
|
|
|
$
|
43,315
|
|
|
$
|
30,421
|
|
|
$
|
201,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The FIN 48 obligations shown in the table above represent
uncertain tax positions related to temporary differences. The
years for which the temporary differences related to the
uncertain tax positions will reverse have been estimated in
scheduling the obligations within the table. In addition to the
Interpretation 48 obligations in the table above, approximately
$1.4 million of unrecognized tax benefits have been
recorded as liabilities in accordance with Interpretation 48,
and we are uncertain as to if or when such amounts may be
settled. Related to the unrecognized tax benefits not included
in the table above, the Company has also recorded a liability
for potential penalties of $29 thousand and interest of $228
thousand.
Since December 31, 2007, there have been no material
changes outside the ordinary course of business to our
contractual obligations as set forth above.
In addition to the obligations noted above, we have obligations
reported as other long-term liabilities that consist primarily
of facility closure and consolidation costs, defined benefit
plan and other post-retirement benefit plans and other items. We
also enter into agreements with our customers at the beginning
of a given platforms life to supply products for the
entire life of that vehicle platform, which is typically five to
seven years. These agreements generally provide for the supply
of a customers production requirements for a particular
platform, rather than for the purchase of a specific quantity of
products. Accordingly, our obligations under these agreements
are not reflected in the contractual obligations table above.
As of December 31, 2007, we were not party to significant
purchase obligations for goods or services.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We use standby letters of credit to guarantee our performance
under various contracts and arrangements, principally in
connection with our workers compensation liabilities and
for leases on equipment and facilities. These letter of credit
contracts are usually extended on a year-to-year basis. As of
December 31, 2007, we had outstanding letters of credit of
$1.8 million. We do not believe that these letters of
credit will be required to be drawn.
We currently have no non-consolidated special purpose entity
arrangements.
47
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Interest
Rate Risk
We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in
foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Market risk
is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market
rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange and interest
rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial
instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We do enter
into financial instruments, from time to time, to manage and
reduce the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
and interest rates and to hedge a portion of future anticipated
currency transactions. The counterparties are primarily major
financial institutions.
We manage our interest rate risk by balancing the amount of our
fixed rate and variable rate debt. For fixed rate debt, interest
rate changes affect the fair market value of such debt but do
not impact earnings or cash flows. Conversely for variable rate
debt, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair
market value of such debt, but do impact future earnings and
cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant.
Approximately $9.5 million and $11.8 million of our
debt was variable rate debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Holding other variables constant (such as foreign
exchange rates and debt levels), a one percentage point change
in interest rates would be expected to have an impact on pre-tax
earnings and cash flows for the next year of approximately
$0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The
impact on the fair market value of our debt at December 31,
2007 and 2006 would have been insignificant.
Foreign
Currency Risk
Foreign currency risk is the risk that we will incur economic
losses due to adverse changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. We use forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign
currency translation exposures of our United Kingdom operations.
We estimate our projected revenues in certain foreign currencies
or locations, and will hedge a portion or all of the anticipated
long or short position. The contracts typically run from three
months up to three years. These contracts are marked-to-market
and the fair value is included in assets (liabilities) in our
consolidated balance sheets, with the offsetting noncash gain or
loss included in other income or expense on our consolidated
statements of operations. We do not hold or issue foreign
exchange options or forward contracts for trading purposes.
Outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts at
December 31, 2007 are more fully described in the notes to
our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The fair value of these contracts at December 31, 2007 and
2006 amounted to a $1.5 million liability and an
$8.5 million asset, respectively, which is reflected in
other long-term liabilities and other assets in our consolidated
balance sheets. None of these contracts have been designated as
cash flow hedges; thus, the change in fair value at each
reporting date is reflected as a noncash charge (income) in our
consolidated statement of operations. In 2008, we have elected
to designate our future forward exchange contracts as cash flow
hedges.
Our primary exposures to foreign currency exchange fluctuations
are pound sterling, Eurodollar and Japanese yen. At
December 31, 2007, the potential reduction in earnings from
a hypothetical instantaneous 10% adverse change in quoted
foreign currency spot rates applied to foreign currency
sensitive instruments is limited by the assumption that all of
the foreign currencies to which we are exposed would
simultaneously decrease by 10% because such synchronized changes
are unlikely to occur. The effects of the forward exchange
contracts have been included in the above analysis; however, the
sensitivity model does not include the inherent risks associated
with the anticipated future transactions denominated in foreign
currency.
Foreign
Currency Transactions
A portion of our revenues during the year ended
December 31, 2007 were derived from manufacturing
operations outside of the United States. The results of
operations and the financial position of our operations in these
other countries are primarily measured in their respective
currency and translated into U.S. dollars. A portion of the
expenses generated in these countries is in currencies different
from which revenue is generated. As discussed above, from time
to time, we enter into forward exchange contracts to mitigate a
portion of this currency risk. The
48
reported income of these operations will be higher or lower
depending on a weakening or strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against the respective foreign currency.
A portion of our assets at December 31, 2007 are based in
our foreign operations and are translated into U.S. dollars
at foreign currency exchange rates in effect as of the end of
each period, with the effect of such translation reflected as a
separate component of stockholders investment.
Accordingly, our stockholders investment will fluctuate
depending upon the weakening or strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against the respective foreign currency.
Effects
of Inflation
Inflation potentially affects us in two principal ways. First, a
portion of our debt is tied to prevailing short-term interest
rates that may change as a result of inflation rates,
translating into changes in interest expense. Second, general
inflation can impact material purchases, labor and other costs.
In many cases, we have limited ability to pass through
inflation-related cost increases due to the competitive nature
of the markets that we serve. In the past few years, however,
inflation has not been a significant factor.
49
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Documents
Filed as Part of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
50
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders investment, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in
the Index to Item 15. These consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement
schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2007, the Company changed
the manner in which it accounts for uncertain income tax
positions.
As discussed in Notes 2 and 14 to the consolidated
financial statements, in 2006, the Company changed its method of
accounting for defined benefit pension and other post-retirement
benefit plans and as discussed in Note 13 to the
consolidated financial statements, in 2006, the Company changed
its method of accounting for share-based compensation.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated March 13, 2008 expressed an
unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 13, 2008
51
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
9,867
|
|
|
$
|
19,821
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of reserve for doubtful accounts of
$3,758 and $5,536, respectively
|
|
|
107,687
|
|
|
|
123,471
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
96,385
|
|
|
|
88,723
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
16,508
|
|
|
|
24,272
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
12,989
|
|
|
|
8,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
243,436
|
|
|
|
265,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
32,793
|
|
|
|
30,203
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
146,448
|
|
|
|
120,416
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
16,636
|
|
|
|
17,414
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(97,619
|
)
|
|
|
(77,645
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
98,258
|
|
|
|
90,388
|
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
151,189
|
|
|
|
134,766
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net of accumulated amortization of $1,687 and
$840, respectively
|
|
|
97,575
|
|
|
|
84,188
|
|
OTHER ASSETS, net
|
|
|
8,631
|
|
|
|
16,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
599,089
|
|
|
$
|
590,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
2,158
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
93,033
|
|
|
|
86,610
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
40,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
126,264
|
|
|
|
129,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current maturities
|
|
|
159,609
|
|
|
|
159,956
|
|
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES
|
|
|
27,076
|
|
|
|
10,611
|
|
PENSION AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
|
|
|
18,335
|
|
|
|
22,188
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
3,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
333,754
|
|
|
|
325,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding; common stock
$.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized;
21,536,814 and 21,368,831 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Treasury stock purchased from employees; 28,153 shares and
5,836 shares, respectively
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
177,421
|
|
|
|
174,044
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
88,818
|
|
|
|
92,007
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(705
|
)
|
|
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders investment
|
|
|
265,335
|
|
|
|
264,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
|
|
$
|
599,089
|
|
|
$
|
590,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
52
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
REVENUES
|
|
$
|
696,786
|
|
|
$
|
918,751
|
|
|
$
|
754,481
|
|
COST OF REVENUES
|
|
|
620,145
|
|
|
|
768,913
|
|
|
|
620,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
76,641
|
|
|
|
149,838
|
|
|
|
134,450
|
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
55,493
|
|
|
|
51,950
|
|
|
|
44,564
|
|
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
RESTRUCTURING COSTS
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
18,821
|
|
|
|
97,474
|
|
|
|
89,528
|
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
|
|
|
9,361
|
|
|
|
(3,468
|
)
|
|
|
(3,741
|
)
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
14,147
|
|
|
|
14,829
|
|
|
|
13,195
|
|
LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
(4,836
|
)
|
|
|
85,795
|
|
|
|
78,549
|
|
(BENEFIT) PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
|
27,745
|
|
|
|
29,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
58,050
|
|
|
$
|
49,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LOSS) EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.74
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.69
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
21,439
|
|
|
|
21,151
|
|
|
|
19,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
21,439
|
|
|
|
21,545
|
|
|
|
19,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
53
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Subscription
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
(Accum.
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Income /
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
Comp.
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2004
|
|
|
17,987,497
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(175
|
)
|
|
$
|
123,660
|
|
|
$
|
(15,454
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,835
|
|
|
$
|
111,046
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2,671,229
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,736
|
|
Exercise of common stock under stock option and equity incentive
plans
|
|
|
319,928
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,885
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
167,300
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Stock subscriptions received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,411
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,645
|
)
|
|
|
(3,645
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(533
|
)
|
|
|
(533
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2005
|
|
|
21,145,954
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
172,514
|
|
|
$
|
33,957
|
|
|
$
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,343
|
)
|
|
$
|
202,077
|
|
Exercise of common stock under stock option and equity incentive
plans
|
|
|
341,685
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,145
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
54,328
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Effect of accounting change SFAS 123(R)
|
|
|
(167,300
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Treasury stock purchased from employees at cost
|
|
|
(5,836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
Excess tax benefit equity transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,050
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,874
|
|
|
|
3,874
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 158, net
of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,472
|
)
|
|
|
(3,472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2006
|
|
|
21,368,831
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
(115
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
174,044
|
|
|
$
|
92,007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
$
|
264,905
|
|
Exercise of common stock under stock option and equity incentive
plans
|
|
|
68,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
121,522
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Treasury stock purchased from employees at cost
|
|
|
(22,317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,084
|
|
Excess tax benefit equity transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,251
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(589
|
)
|
|
|
(589
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,711
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to initially apply FIN 48, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2007
|
|
|
21,536,814
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
|
$
|
(414
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
177,421
|
|
|
$
|
88,818
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(705
|
)
|
|
$
|
265,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
54
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
58,050
|
|
|
$
|
49,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,425
|
|
|
|
14,983
|
|
|
|
12,064
|
|
Noncash amortization of debt financing costs
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
Shared-based compensation expense
|
|
|
3,084
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Pension and other post-retirement curtailment gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,865
|
)
|
|
|
(3,097
|
)
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
9,691
|
|
|
|
9,417
|
|
|
|
7,248
|
|
Noncash loss (gain) on forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
9,967
|
|
|
|
(4,203
|
)
|
|
|
(3,793
|
)
|
Change in other operating items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
28,347
|
|
|
|
(4,369
|
)
|
|
|
(22,013
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,809
|
|
|
|
(16,603
|
)
|
|
|
(11,571
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
|
|
(21,819
|
)
|
|
|
9,958
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(24,830
|
)
|
|
|
2,213
|
|
|
|
10,145
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
(6,562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
47,575
|
|
|
|
36,922
|
|
|
|
44,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(16,981
|
)
|
|
|
(19,327
|
)
|
|
|
(15,957
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal/sale of property plant and equipment
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal/sale of other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-acquisition and acquistion payments, net of cash received
|
|
|
(36,049
|
)
|
|
|
(9,452
|
)
|
|
|
(170,851
|
)
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
(1,230
|
)
|
|
|
(1,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(53,292
|
)
|
|
|
(27,625
|
)
|
|
|
(188,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,914
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under equity incentive
plans
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock from employees
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from equity incentive plans
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(129,490
|
)
|
|
|
(74,711
|
)
|
|
|
(207,449
|
)
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
137,521
|
|
|
|
72,398
|
|
|
|
206,778
|
|
Repayments of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
(10,295
|
)
|
|
|
(28,210
|
)
|
|
|
(238,336
|
)
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,459
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 8% senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs and other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(2,394
|
)
|
|
|
(27,952
|
)
|
|
|
188,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(1,843
|
)
|
|
|
(2,165
|
)
|
|
|
(4,889
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(9,954
|
)
|
|
|
(20,820
|
)
|
|
|
39,245
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
19,821
|
|
|
|
40,641
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
9,867
|
|
|
$
|
19,821
|
|
|
$
|
40,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
13,185
|
|
|
$
|
13,869
|
|
|
$
|
6,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (received) paid for income taxes, net
|
|
$
|
(10,807
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,197
|
|
|
$
|
24,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid purchases of property and equipment included in accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
3,062
|
|
|
$
|
4,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
55
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries
(CVG or the Company) design and
manufacture seat systems, interior trim systems (including
instrument and door panels, headliners, cabinetry, molded
products and floor systems), cab structures and components,
mirrors, wiper systems, electronic wiring harness assemblies and
controls and switches for the global commercial vehicle market,
including the heavy-duty truck market, the construction,
military, bus, agriculture and specialty transportation markets.
We have facilities located in the United States in Arizona,
Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon,
Tennessee, Virginia and Washington and outside of the United
States in Australia, Belgium, China, Czech Republic, Mexico,
Sweden, Ukraine and the United Kingdom.
|
|
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
Principles of Consolidation The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP) requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results may differ materially from those
estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash
equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents are
stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
Accounts Receivable Trade accounts receivable
are stated at current value less an allowance for doubtful
accounts, which approximates fair value. This estimated
allowance is based primarily on managements evaluation of
specific balances as the balances become past due, the financial
condition of our customers and our historical experience of
write-offs. If not reserved through specific identification
procedures, our general policy for uncollectible accounts is to
reserve at a certain percentage threshold, based upon the aging
categories of accounts receivable. Past due status is based upon
the due date of the original amounts outstanding. When items are
ultimately deemed uncollectible, they are charged off against
the reserve previously established in the allowance for doubtful
accounts.
Inventories We maintain our inventory
primarily for the manufacture of goods for sale to our
customers. Inventory is composed of three categories: Raw
Materials, Work in Process, and Finished Goods. These categories
are generally defined as follows: Raw Materials consist of
materials that have been acquired and are available for the
production cycle; Work in Process is composed of materials that
have been moved into the production process and have some
measurable amount of labor and overhead added; Finished Goods
are materials with added labor and overhead that have completed
the production cycle and are awaiting sale and delivery to
customers.
Inventories are valued at the lower of
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) cost or market. Cost includes
applicable material, labor and overhead. We value our finished
goods inventory at a standard cost that is periodically adjusted
to approximate actual cost. Inventory quantities on-hand are
regularly reviewed, and where necessary, provisions for excess
and obsolete inventory are recorded based primarily on our
estimated production requirements driven by current market
volumes. Excess and obsolete provisions may vary by product
depending upon future potential use of the product.
56
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant
and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is
computed using the straight-line method over the following
estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
15 to 40 years
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3 to 20 years
|
|
Tools and dies
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Computer hardware and software
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense
as incurred. Expenditures for major betterments and renewals
that extend the useful lives of property, plant and equipment
are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining useful lives
of the asset. When assets are retired or sold, the cost and
related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts
and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the results of
operations. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
improvements or the term of the lease, whichever is shorter.
Accelerated depreciation methods are used for tax reporting
purposes.
We follow the provisions of SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, which provides a single accounting model for
impairment of long-lived assets. We had no impairments during
2007, 2006, or 2005.
Intangible
Assets Indefinite-Lived
Basis for
Accounting Treatment
Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of customer
relationships acquired in the 2005 acquisitions of Mayflower and
Monona. We have accounted for these customer relationships as
indefinite-lived intangible assets, which we believe is
appropriate based upon the following circumstances and
conditions under which we operate:
Sourcing,
Barriers to Entry and Competitor Risks
The customer sourcing decision for the Mayflower and Monona
businesses is heavily predicated on price, quality, delivery and
the overall customer relationship. Absent a significant change
in any or all of these factors, it is unlikely that a customer
would source production to an alternate supplier. In addition,
the factors listed below impose a high barrier for new
competitors to enter into this industry. Historical experience
indicates that Mayflower and Monona have not lost any primary
customers
and/or
relationships due to these factors and such loss is not
anticipated in the foreseeable future for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Costs associated with setting up a new production line,
including tooling costs, are typically cost prohibitive in a
competitive pricing environment;
|
|
|
|
The risk associated with potential production delays and a
disruption to the supply chain typically outweighs any potential
economic benefit;
|
|
|
|
Significant initial outlays of capital and institutional
production knowledge represent a significant barrier to entry.
Due to the asset-intensive nature of the businesses, a new
competitor would require a substantial amount of initial capital;
|
|
|
|
Changeover costs are high both from an economic and risk
standpoint;
|
|
|
|
The highly complex nature of successfully producing electronic
wiring harnesses and complete cab structures in accordance with
OEM quality standards makes it difficult for a competitor to
enter the business; and
|
57
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
There is significant risk in operating the businesses as a
result of the highly customized nature of the business. For
example, production runs in the commercial vehicle business are
significantly smaller and are more build to order in
nature which requires the systems, expertise, equipment and
logistics in order to be successful.
|
These costs and risks are the primary prohibiting factors which
preclude our customers from sourcing their business elsewhere at
any given time.
Duration
and Strength of Existing Customer Relationships/Concentrations
of Revenue
Mayflower and Monona have long-standing relationships with their
existing customers and have experienced de minimis historical
attrition. These relationships have endured over time and,
accordingly, an assumption of prospective attrition is
inconsistent with this historical experience and
managements expectations. Both Mayflower and Monona have a
limited customer base, consisting of three primary customers,
that has existed for many years, and we had pre-existing
long-standing relationships with the same primary customers
prior to the acquisitions of Mayflower and Monona, which in most
cases have exceeded a period of 40 years. We believe the
addition of Mayflower and Monona further strengthens our
existing customer relationships with such customers.
Specifically:
Mayflower and Mononas relationships with their
customers key decision-making personnel are mature and
stable.
|
|
|
|
|
Mayflowers and Mononas customers typically make
purchasing decisions through a team approach versus a single
decision maker. Mayflower and Monona have historically
maintained strong relationships with individuals at all levels
of the decision making process including the engineering,
operations and purchasing functions in order to successfully
minimize the impact of any employee turnover at the customer
level.
|
The top three customers of Mayflower and Monona have been
established customers for a substantial period of time.
|
|
|
|
|
Mayflower has had relationships with Volvo/Mack, Freightliner
and International since 1965, 1997 and 2001, respectively. We
and/or our
predecessor entities, had pre-existing relationships with these
same customers since 1949, 1954 and 1950, respectively. These
customers comprised approximately 89%, 88% and 85% of
Mayflowers revenues for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
Monona has had relationships with Deere & Co.,
Caterpillar and Oshkosh since 1969, 1970 and 1985, respectively.
We and/or
our predecessor entities, had pre-existing relationships with
these same customers since 1987, 1958 and 1950, respectively.
These customers comprised approximately 84%, 85% and 88% of
Mononas revenues for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
|
Valuation
Methodology
For valuation purposes, the income approach using the discounted
cash flow method was employed for the purpose of evaluating the
Mayflower and Monona customer relationship intangible assets.
Under this approach, we determined that the fair value of the
Mayflower and Monona customer relationship intangible assets at
their dates of acquisition was $45.9 million and
$28.9 million, respectively.
Significant assumptions used in the valuation and determination
of an indefinite useful life for these customer relationship
intangible assets included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The revenue projections that we relied upon to substantiate the
economic consideration paid for the businesses is almost
exclusively tied to the existing customer base. With regard to
the valuation process, we projected less than 1% of total
revenue in 2005 and 2006 to be lost due to core customer
attrition and no core customer attrition thereafter.
|
58
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Contributory asset charges were deducted for assets that
contribute to income generation including: (i) net working
capital; (ii) personal property; (iii) real property;
(iv) tradename and trademarks; and (v) an assembled
workforce.
|
|
|
|
The cash flows associated with the customer relationships
acquired in the Mayflower and Monona transactions were
discounted at a rate of return of 25.0% and 29.5%, respectively,
which is approximately equal to the equity rate of return.
|
Intangible
Asset Impairment Accounting Treatment
If Mayflower
and/or
Monona were to prospectively lose any of their customers, in
accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 16 and 17 of
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, we would perform an intangible asset impairment test
to determine the impact of the loss on the customer relationship
intangible asset and if impairment was indicated, we would
record an impairment loss in our consolidated statement of
operations.
Other Assets Other assets primarily consist
of long-term supply contracts of approximately $3.8 million
at December 31, 2007 and approximately $3.0 million at
December 31, 2006, fair value of foreign exchange contracts
of approximately $0.0 million in 2007 and approximately
$8.5 million in 2006 and debt financing costs of
approximately $3.9 million at December 31, 2007 and
approximately $4.8 million at December 31, 2006, which
are being amortized over the term of the related obligations.
Revenue Recognition Product revenue is
derived from sales of our various manufactured products. Our
revenue recognition policy is in accordance with the SECs
SAB No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements, SAB No. 104, Revenue
Recognition, and other authoritative accounting literature.
In accordance with the provisions of such authoritative
accounting literature, we recognize revenue when
1) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered,
2) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
3) there is a fixed or determinable price, and
4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Our products are
generally shipped from our facilities to our customers, which is
when title passes to the customer for substantially all of our
revenues.
Provisions for anticipated contract losses are recognized at the
time they become evident. In that regard, in certain instances,
we may be committed under existing agreements to supply product
to our customers at selling prices that are not sufficient to
cover the cost to produce such product. In such situations, we
record a provision for the estimated future amount of such
losses. Such losses are recognized at the time that the loss is
probable and reasonably estimable and are recorded at the
minimum amount necessary to fulfill our obligations to our
customers. We had approximately $0.4 million as of
December 31, 2007 and no such provision as of
December 31, 2006. These amounts, as they relate to the
year ended December 31, 2007 are included within accrued
liabilities and other long-term liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
Warranty We are subject to warranty claims
for products that fail to perform as expected due to design or
manufacturing deficiencies. Customers continue to require their
outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their products and
bear the cost of repair or replacement of such products.
Depending on the terms under which we supply products to our
customers, a customer may hold us responsible for some or all of
the repair or replacement costs of defective products, when the
product supplied did not perform as represented. Our policy is
to record provisions for estimated future customer warranty
costs based on historical trends and current economic factors.
These amounts, as they relate to the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 are included within accrued
expenses
59
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The following
presents a summary of the warranty provision for the years ended
December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
5,197
|
|
|
$
|
7,117
|
|
Increase due to acquisitions
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Additional provisions recorded
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
3,391
|
|
Deduction for payments made
|
|
|
(3,691
|
)
|
|
|
(5,366
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of year
|
|
$
|
3,958
|
|
|
$
|
5,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes We account for income taxes
following the provisions of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires recognition
of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future
tax consequences of events that have been included in our
financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred
tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the
difference between the financial statement and tax basis of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax laws and rates. In July
2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes an interpretation of SFAS 109.
FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for how
companies should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in
their financial statements, uncertain tax positions taken or
expected to be taken on a tax return. Under FIN 48, tax
positions shall initially be recognized in the financial
statements when it is more likely than not the position will be
sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax
positions shall initially and subsequently be measured as the
largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority
assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.
FIN 48 also revises disclosure requirements to include an
annual tabular rollforward of unrecognized tax benefits. The
provisions of this interpretation are required to be adopted for
fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2006. We
adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007,
and as a result, recognized approximately $62 thousand decrease
in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was
accounted for as an increase to the January 1, 2007 balance
of retained earnings.
Comprehensive (Loss) We follow the provisions
of SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income, which established standards for reporting and
display of comprehensive income and its components.
Comprehensive income reflects the change in equity of a business
enterprise during a period from transactions and other events
and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive (loss)
represents net income adjusted for foreign currency translation
adjustments, minimum pension liability and the deferred gain
(loss) on certain derivative instruments utilized to hedge
certain of our interest rate exposures. In accordance with
SFAS No. 130, we have chosen to disclose comprehensive
(loss) in the consolidated statements of stockholders
investment. The components of accumulated other comprehensive
(loss) consisted of the following as of December 31 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
4,868
|
|
|
$
|
5,457
|
|
Pension liability
|
|
|
(5,406
|
)
|
|
|
(6,702
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(705
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments At
December 31, 2007, our financial instruments consist of
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable, accrued liabilities and long-term debt, unless
otherwise noted. The carrying value of these instruments
approximates fair value as a result of the short duration of
such instruments or due to the variability of the interest cost
associated with such instruments.
60
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Concentrations of Credit Risk Financial
instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of
credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and
accounts receivable. We place our cash equivalents with high
credit-quality financial institutions. We sell products to
various companies throughout the world in the ordinary course of
business. We routinely assess the financial strength of our
customers and maintain allowances for anticipated losses.
Customers that accounted for a significant portion of
consolidated revenues for each of the three years ended December
31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
PACCAR
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Caterpillar
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Freightliner
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Volvo/Mack
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, receivables from these
customers represented approximately 50% and 67% of total
receivables, respectively.
Foreign Currency Translation Our functional
currency is the local currency. Accordingly, all assets and
liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated using
exchange rates in effect at the end of the period and revenue
and costs are translated using average exchange rates for the
period. The related translation adjustments are reported in
accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders
investment. Translation gains and losses arising from
transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional
currency of the entity involved are included in the results of
operations.
Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts
We use forward exchange contracts to hedge certain of our
foreign currency transaction exposures of our United Kingdom
operations. We estimate our projected revenues in certain
foreign currencies or locations, and will hedge a portion or all
of the anticipated long or short position. The contract duration
is typically between three months and three years. These
contracts are marked-to-market and the fair value is included in
assets or liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets, with the offsetting noncash gain or loss included other
income and expense on our accompanying consolidated statements
of operations. We do not hold or issue foreign exchange options
or forward contracts for trading purposes. The following table
summarizes the notional amount of our open foreign exchange
contracts at December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. $
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
U.S. $
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Commitments to sell currencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
$
|
(598
|
)
|
|
$
|
(598
|
)
|
Eurodollar
|
|
|
49,336
|
|
|
|
69,329
|
|
|
|
72,797
|
|
Swedish krona
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
3,150,200
|
|
|
|
32,114
|
|
|
|
29,948
|
|
Australian Dollar
|
|
|
5,350
|
|
|
|
4,502
|
|
|
|
4,616
|
|
The difference between the U.S. $ equivalent and
U.S. $ equivalent fair value of approximately
$1.5 million liability and $8.5 million asset is included
in other long-term liabilities and other assets in the
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In
July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, an interpretation of
SFAS 109. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive
model for how companies should recognize, measure, present, and
disclose in their financial statements, uncertain tax positions
taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under
FIN 48, tax positions shall initially be recognized in the
financial statements when it is more likely than not the
61
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
position will be sustained upon examination by the tax
authorities. Such tax positions shall initially and subsequently
be measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater
than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with
the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and
all relevant facts. FIN 48 also revises disclosure
requirements to include an annual tabular rollforward of
unrecognized tax benefits. The provisions of this interpretation
are required to be adopted for fiscal periods beginning after
December 15, 2006. We adopted the provisions of FIN 48
on January 1, 2007, and as a result, recognized
approximately $62 thousand decrease in the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as an
increase to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained
earnings.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to
U.S. GAAP guidance requiring use of fair value, establishes
a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure
about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of
adopting the provisions of SFAS No. 157 on our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).
SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the
funded status of defined benefit pension and other
post-retirement benefit plans as an asset or liability in our
consolidated balance sheets and to recognize changes in that
funded status in the year in which the changes occur through
accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders
investment. SFAS No. 158 also requires that, beginning
in 2008, our assumptions used to measure our annual defined
benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans be
determined as of the balance sheet date, and all plan assets and
liabilities be reported as of that date. Currently, the
assumptions used to measure our annual defined benefit pension
and other post-retirement benefit plan expenses are determined
as of October 1 or December 31 (measurement dates) for our
various plans, and all plan assets and liabilities are generally
reported as of those dates. We are currently assessing the
impact of the measurement date change of SFAS 158 on our
consolidated financial positions and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS No. 159, which amends
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities, allows certain financial assets
and liabilities to be recognized, at our election, at fair
market value, with any gains or losses for the period recorded
in the statement of income. SFAS No. 159 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are
currently assessing the impact of SFAS 159 on our
consolidated financial positions and results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Finance
Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51.
SFAS No. 141(R) will change how business acquisitions
are accounted for and will impact financial statements both on
the acquisition date and in subsequent periods.
SFAS No. 160 will change the accounting and reporting
for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as
noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of
equity. Early adoption is prohibited for both standards. The
provisions of SFAS No. 141(R) and
SFAS No. 160 are effective for our 2009 fiscal year
beginning January 1, 2009, and are to be applied
prospectively.
In October 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock
of PEKM Kabeltechnik s.r.o. (PEKM), an electronic
wire harness manufacturer primarily for the commercial truck
market, with facilities in the Czech Republic and the Ukraine
for approximately $21.2 million in cash. The acquisition
was financed with borrowings from our revolving credit facility.
The operating results of PEKM have been included in our 2007
consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
From the date of acquisition through December 31, 2007 PEKM
recorded revenues of approximately $15.5 million and an
operating loss of approximately $0.1 million.
62
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In October 2007, we acquired the heavy-gauge thermoforming and
injection molding assets of the Fabrication Division of Gage
Industries, Inc. (Gage) for approximately
$5.5 million in cash. The acquisition was financed with
borrowings from our revolving credit facility. The operating
results of Gage have been included in our 2007 consolidated
financial statements since the date of acquisition. From the
date of acquisition through December 31, 2007 Gage recorded
revenues of approximately $1.9 million and an operating
loss of approximately $0.3 million.
In December 2007, we acquired substantially all of the assets of
Short Bark Industries, LLC (SBI), a supplier of seat
covers and various
cut-and-sew
trim products, for approximately $3.6 million in cash and
approximately $2.3 million of net liabilities due to us.
The acquisition was financed with borrowings from our revolving
credit facility. The operating results of SBI have been included
in our 2007 consolidated financial statements since the date of
acquisition. From the date of acquisition through
December 31, 2007 SBI recorded revenues of approximately
$0.0 million and an operating loss of approximately
$0.1 million.
On a pro forma basis had the PEKM, Gage and SBI acquisitions
been included in our consolidated financial statement for the
full year 2007, our revenues would have increased by
approximately $57.2 million and operating income would have
increased by approximately $1.3 million, as shown in the
following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEKM
|
|
|
Gage
|
|
|
SBI
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
39,147
|
|
|
$
|
13,082
|
|
|
$
|
4,940
|
|
|
$
|
57,169
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
640
|
|
|
$
|
(409
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
|
$
|
1,252
|
|
The PEKM, Gage and SBI acquisitions were accounted for by the
purchase method of accounting. Under purchase accounting, the
preliminary purchase price is allocated to the tangible and
intangible assets and liabilities of the Company based upon
their respective fair values. We continue to evaluate the
purchase price allocation, including intangible assets,
contingent liabilities and property, plant and equipment, and
expect to revise the purchase price allocation as better
information becomes available. The preliminary purchase price
and costs associated with the acquisitions exceeded the
preliminary fair value of the net assets acquired by
approximately $26.9 million. Our valuation of goodwill as
of December 31, 2007 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEKM
|
|
|
Gage
|
|
|
SBI
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Contract purchase price
|
|
$
|
25,760
|
|
|
$
|
5,500
|
|
|
$
|
3,626
|
|
|
$
|
34,886
|
|
Working capital and other adjustments
|
|
|
(4,522
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
(2,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary purchase price (cash consideration)
|
|
|
21,238
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
5,923
|
|
|
|
32,661
|
|
Transaction costs and other adjustments
|
|
|
(896
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
(1,921
|
)
|
Net assets at historical cost
|
|
|
(2,293
|
)
|
|
|
(4,168
|
)
|
|
|
2,666
|
|
|
|
(3,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of purchase price over net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
18,049
|
|
|
$
|
1,312
|
|
|
$
|
7,584
|
|
|
$
|
26,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, the
preliminary purchase price as shown above is allocated to
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based on their
estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. The
preliminary purchase price allocation as of December 31,
2007 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEKM
|
|
|
Gage
|
|
|
SBI
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
2,519
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
7,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
7,180
|
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
9,787
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,480
|
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
6,377
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles
|
|
|
18,049
|
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
|
|
7,584
|
|
|
|
26,945
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(13,482
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
|
|
(16,959
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(2,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
23,757
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
5,955
|
|
|
|
35,212
|
|
Less: Cash received
|
|
|
(2,519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(2,551
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract purchase price
|
|
$
|
21,238
|
|
|
$
|
5,500
|
|
|
$
|
5,923
|
|
|
$
|
32,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following pro forma information presents the result of
operations as if the 2007 acquisitions of PEKM, Gage and SBI and
the 2006 acquisition of C.I.E.B. had taken place at the
beginning of each period presented below. The pro forma results
are not necessarily indicative of the financial position or
result of operations had the acquisitions taken place on the
dates indicated. In addition, the pro forma results are not
necessarily indicative of the future financial or operating
results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
753,955
|
|
|
$
|
1,006,114
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
20,967
|
|
|
$
|
102,502
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(4,042
|
)
|
|
$
|
57,945
|
|
Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.74
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.69
|
|
Inventories consisted of the following as of December 31 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
62,129
|
|
|
$
|
61,617
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
19,811
|
|
|
|
14,436
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
19,862
|
|
|
|
17,314
|
|
Less: excess and obsolete
|
|
|
(5,417
|
)
|
|
|
(4,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
96,385
|
|
|
$
|
88,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
11,389
|
|
|
$
|
16,021
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
6,039
|
|
|
|
6,104
|
|
Warranty costs
|
|
|
3,958
|
|
|
|
5,197
|
|
Legal/professional fees
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
|
|
2,495
|
|
Income and other taxes
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
Facility closure and consolidation costs
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,256
|
|
|
|
10,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,115
|
|
|
$
|
40,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Restructuring
and Integration
|
Restructuring In 2007, our Board of Directors
approved the closing of our Seattle, Washington facility and
transfer of operations to existing plants throughout the United
States in order to improve customer service and strengthen our
long-term competitive position. The decision to close the
Seattle facility and redistribute the work was the result of a
long-term analysis of changing market requirements, including
the consolidation of product lines and closer proximity to
customer operations. The closure was substantially completed as
of December 31, 2007. We estimate that we will record in
accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, total charges
of approximately $2.4 million, consisting of employee
related costs of approximately $1.1 million, non-cash
expense related to the write-down of certain assets of
approximately $0.4 million and facility exit and other
contractual costs of approximately $0.9 million. The
Company has incurred costs of approximately $1.4 million in
the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 consisting of
approximately $0.8 million employee related costs,
$0.5 million of facility exit and other contractual costs
and $0.1 million in noncash expense related to the
write-down of certain assets. We estimate that approximately
$1.4 million of the total charges will be incurred as
future cash expenditures.
A summary of these restructuring activities for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
646
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integration In connection with the
acquisitions of Bostrom plc and the predecessor to CVS, facility
consolidation plans were designed and implemented to reduce the
cost structure and to better integrate the acquired operations.
Purchase liabilities recorded as part of the acquisitions
included approximately $3.3 million for costs associated
with the shutdown and consolidation of certain acquired
facilities and severance and other contractual costs. At
December 31, 2007, we had principally completed our actions
under these plans, other than certain
65
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
contractual commitments, which continue through 2008. Summarized
below is the activity related to these actions (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Contractual Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the June 8, 2005 acquisition of Monona,
plans were established to realign certain operations in an
effort to achieve synergies between us and Monona, including the
closure of our Spring Green, Wisconsin operations and the
administrative office located in Naperville, Illinois. Purchase
liabilities recorded as part of the acquisition include
approximately $0.9 million related to employee severance
and associated benefits for approximately 100 employees and
approximately $1.1 million related to facility exit,
transition and other estimated costs. These activities were
completed as of December 31, 2007. Summarized below is the
activity related to these actions (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Contractual Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
946
|
|
|
$
|
1,067
|
|
|
$
|
2,013
|
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
(1,067
|
)
|
|
|
(1,953
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revolving credit facilities bore interest at a weighted average
of 8.5% as of December 31, 2007 and 7.1% as of
December 31, 2006 due 2010
|
|
$
|
9,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,469
|
|
Term loans, with principal and interest payable quarterly, bore
interest at a weighted average rate of 6.8% as of
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,295
|
|
8.0% senior notes due 2013
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,725
|
|
|
|
162,114
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
159,609
|
|
|
$
|
159,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future maturities of debt as of December 31, 2007 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
2009
|
|
|
106
|
|
2010
|
|
|
9,502
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Credit Agreement We account for amendments to
our revolving credit facility under the provisions of EITF Issue
No. 98-14,
Debtors Accounting for the Changes in Line-of-Credit or
Revolving-Debt Arrangements
(EITF 98-14),
and our term loan and 8.0% senior notes under the
provisions of EITF Issue
No. 96-19,
Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of
Debt Instruments
(EITF 96-19).
Historically, we have periodically amended the terms of our
revolving credit facility and term loan to increase or decrease
the individual and collective borrowing base of the instruments
on an as needed basis. We have not modified the terms of our
8.0% senior notes subsequent to the original offering date.
In connection with an amendment of our revolving credit
facility, bank fees incurred are deferred and amortized over the
term of the new arrangement and, if applicable, any outstanding
deferred fees are expensed proportionately or in total, as
appropriate per the guidance of
EITF 98-14.
In connection with an amendment of our term loan, under the
terms of
EITF 96-19,
bank and any third-party fees are either expensed as an
extinguishment of debt or deferred and amortized over the term
of the agreement based upon whether or not the old and new debt
instruments are substantially different.
On June 30, 2006, we repaid approximately
$25.0 million of our U.S. dollar denominated term
loan. The repayment of the term loan reduced the principal
amount of the term loan from approximately $40 million to
$15 million. In connection with this loan repayment,
approximately $0.3 million of deferred fees, representing a
proportionate amount of total deferred fees, were expensed as a
loss on early extinguishment of debt.
On June 29, 2007, we repaid our foreign denominated term
loan in full. In connection with this loan repayment,
approximately $0.1 million of deferred fees, representing a
proportionate amount of total deferred fees, were expensed as a
loss on early extinguishment of debt.
On August 16, 2007, we entered into an Amendment and Waiver
Letter to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the
Amendment and Waiver Letter). Pursuant to the terms
of the Amendment and Waiver Letter, the lenders consented to
increase the size of permitted acquisitions to $40 million
per fiscal year and waived any default or event of default in
connection with intercompany loans, contributions to capital,
investments in capital stock or mixed stock and indebtedness
certificates provided in connection with permitted acquisitions.
On September 28, 2007, we entered into the Tenth Amendment
to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the Tenth
Amendment). Pursuant to the terms of the Tenth Amendment,
the lenders consented to various amendments, including but not
limited to, changes to reporting requirements and financial
ratios, which included the fixed charge coverage ratio and the
maximum ratio of total indebtedness. Based on the provisions of
EITF 98-14,
approximately $0.1 million third party fees relating to the
credit agreement were capitalized and are being amortized over
the remaining life of the senior credit agreement.
On March 11, 2008, we entered into the Eleventh Amendment
to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the
Eleventh Amendment). Pursuant to the terms of the
Eleventh Amendment, the banks party thereto consented to various
amendments to the senior credit agreement, including but not
limited to: (i) amendments to the fixed charge ratio and
the leverage ratio to provide the Company increased flexibility
in the near future; (ii) an amendment to the applicable
margin pricing grid to include increased rates for prime rate
and LIBOR borrowings when the Companys leverage ratio is
equal to or greater than 4.0x; (iii) a reduction in the
size of the revolving credit facility from $100 million to
$50 million, subject to increases to $75 million and
then to
67
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$100 million upon satisfaction of certain conditions,
including meeting certain financial covenant thresholds;
(iv) increases in certain baskets in the indebtedness,
asset disposition, investment and lien covenants contained in
the senior credit agreement; and (v) an amendment to permit
proposed future tax planning.
As of December 31, 2007, approximately $3.9 million in
deferred fees relating to previous amendments of our senior
credit agreement and fees related to the 8.0% senior note
offering were outstanding and are being amortized over the life
of the agreements.
The senior credit agreement provides us with the ability to
denominate a portion of our borrowings in foreign currencies. As
of December 31, 2007, $9.5 million of the revolving
credit facility borrowings were denominated in U.S. dollars
and none of the revolving credit facility borrowings were
denominated in British pounds sterling.
Terms, Covenants and Compliance Status Our
senior credit agreement contains various restrictive covenants,
including limiting indebtedness, rental obligations, investments
and cash dividends, and also requires the maintenance of certain
financial ratios, including fixed charge coverage and funded
debt to EBITDA as defined by our senior credit agreement. We
were in compliance with respect to these covenants as of
December 31, 2007. Under this agreement, borrowings bear
interest at various rates plus a margin based on certain
financial ratios. Borrowings under the senior credit agreement
are secured by specifically identified assets, comprising in
total, substantially all assets of the company and its
subsidiaries party to the financing, except that the assets of
our foreign subsidiaries party to the financing only secure
foreign borrowings. Additionally, as of December 31, 2007,
we had outstanding letters of credit of approximately
$1.8 million.
|
|
8.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition purchase price
over the fair value of net assets acquired. We review goodwill
and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually
in the second fiscal quarter and whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable
in accordance with SFAS No. 142. We review
definite-lived intangible assets in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 142 and SFAS No. 144.
The provisions of SFAS No. 142 require that a two-step
impairment test be performed on goodwill. In the first step, we
compare the fair value of our reporting unit to our carrying
value. Our reporting unit is consistent with the reportable
segment identified in Note 10 to the consolidated financial
statements contained in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. If the fair value of
the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets
assigned to that unit, goodwill is considered not impaired and
we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying
value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds
the fair value of the reporting unit, then we must perform the
second step of the impairment test in order to determine the
implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill. If the
carrying value of a reporting units goodwill exceeds the
implied fair value, then we would record an impairment loss
equal to the difference. SFAS No. 142 also requires
that the fair value of the purchased intangible assets with
indefinite lives be estimated and compared to the carrying
value. We estimate the fair value of these intangible assets
using an income approach. We recognize an impairment loss when
the estimated fair value of the intangible asset is less than
the carrying value. In this regard, management considers the
following indicators in determining if events or changes in
circumstances have occurred indicating that the recoverability
of the carrying amount of indefinite-lived and amortizing
intangible assets should be assessed: (1) a significant
decrease in the market value of an asset; (2) a significant
change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used or a
significant physical change in an asset; (3) a significant
adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that
could affect the value of an asset or an adverse action or
assessment by a regulator; (4) an accumulation of costs
significantly in excess of the amount originally expected to
acquire or construct an asset; and (5) a current period
operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating
or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that
demonstrates continuing losses associated with an asset used for
the purpose of producing revenue. Our annual goodwill analysis
was performed during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and did
not result in an impairment charge.
68
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances change,
a determination is made by management, in accordance with
SFAS No. 144 to ascertain whether property and
equipment and certain definite-lived intangibles have been
impaired based on the sum of expected future undiscounted cash
flows from operating activities. If the estimated net cash flows
are less than the carrying amount of such assets, we will
recognize an impairment loss in an amount necessary to write
down the assets to fair value as determined from expected future
discounted cash flows. In accordance with SFAS 142, we test
intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill for
impairment annually or when conditions indicate impairment may
have occurred.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in
nature and involves the use of significant estimates and
assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue
growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected
future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic
and market conditions and determination of appropriate market
comparables. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we
believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and
inherently uncertain. The valuation approaches we use include
the Income Approach (the Discounted Cash Flow Method) and the
Market Approach (the Guideline Company and Transaction Methods)
to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit; earnings are
emphasized in the Discounted Cash Flow, Guideline Company, and
the Transaction Methods. In addition, these methods utilize
market data in the derivation of a value estimate and are
forward-looking in nature. The Discounted Cash Flow Method
utilizes a market-derived rate of return to discount anticipated
performance, while the Guideline Company Method and the
Transaction Method incorporate multiples that are based on the
markets assessment of future performance. Actual future
results may differ materially from those estimates.
Principal
Factors Contributing to the Recognition of Goodwill
Mayflower:
The primary reasons for the acquisition of Mayflower and the
principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
|
|
|
|
|
Mayflower is the only non-captive producer of complete steel and
aluminum truck cabs for the commercial vehicle sector in North
America;
|
|
|
|
We believe the acquisition allows us to be the only supplier
worldwide to offer complete cab systems in sequence, integrating
interior trim and seats with the cab structure;
|
|
|
|
We believe the acquisition gives us a leading position in North
American cab structures and complete cab assemblies, as well as
full service cab and sleeper engineering and development
capabilities; and
|
|
|
|
Mayflower broadens our revenue base at International, Volvo/Mack
and Freightliner and enhances our cross-selling opportunities.
|
Monona:
The primary reasons for the acquisition of Monona and the
principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
|
|
|
|
|
Monona operates in the U.S. and Mexico which enhances our
international footprint, solidifies our domestic footprint and
allows for cost savings opportunities;
|
|
|
|
We believe Monona enhances our ability to offer comprehensive
cab systems to our customers and expands our electronic assembly
capabilities; and
|
|
|
|
Monona broadens our revenue base at Caterpillar, Oshkosh and
Deere & Co. and enhances our cross-selling
opportunities.
|
69
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cabarrus:
The primary reasons for the acquisition of Cabarrus and the
principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
|
|
|
|
|
Cabarrus offers injection molding capabilities and expertise
which enhances our molding and plastics product
portfolio; and
|
|
|
|
We believe Cabarrus offers cross-selling opportunities as well
as the capability to in-source products for cost savings
opportunities.
|
C.I.E.B.:
The primary reasons for the acquisition of C.I.E.B. and the
principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
|
|
|
|
|
C.I.E.B. provides us with a wide variety of bus and truck seats,
complements our existing product offering and provides us with a
well positioned platform to utilize as a building block for our
global expansion and sourcing efforts.
|
PEKM:
The primary reasons for the acquisition of PEKM and the
principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
|
|
|
|
|
PEKM operates in the Czech Republic and Ukraine which enhances
our international manufacturing presence in developing regions
of the world and allows for cost savings opportunities;
|
|
|
|
We believe PEKM enhances our ability to offer comprehensive
products and services to new and existing customers and markets
and expands our electronic wire harness assembly
capabilities; and
|
|
|
|
PEKM offers cross-selling opportunities and provides us with new
customers, MAN, Daimler and Skoda.
|
Gage:
The primary reasons for the acquisition of Gage and the
principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
|
|
|
|
|
Gage offers heavy-gauge thermoforming capabilities and expertise
which enhances our interior trim capabilities; and
|
|
|
|
We believe Gage offers cross-selling opportunities as well as
the capability to in-source products for cost savings
opportunities and broadens our revenue base at existing
customers.
|
SBI:
The primary reasons for the acquisition of SBI and the principal
factors that contributed to a purchase price that resulted in
the recognition of goodwill were:
|
|
|
|
|
SBI offers
cut-and-sew
capabilities and expertise which enhances our ability to
centralize our existing
cut-and-sew
operations for cost savings opportunities
|
70
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007, were comprised of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
134,766
|
|
Increase due to acquisition
|
|
|
16,687
|
|
Post-acquisition adjustments
|
|
|
(588
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
151,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded
approximately $0.6 million of post acquisition adjustments
as we finalize our purchase price allocations.
Our intangible assets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 were
comprised of the following, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Definite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames/Trademarks
|
|
|
30 years
|
|
|
$
|
9,790
|
|
|
$
|
(915
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,875
|
|
Licenses
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
125
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
|
|
14,234
|
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
13,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,462
|
|
|
$
|
(1,687
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
151,189
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
151,189
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
225,989
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
225,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
248,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Definite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames/Trademarks
|
|
|
30 years
|
|
|
$
|
9,790
|
|
|
$
|
(589
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,201
|
|
Licenses
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,228
|
|
|
$
|
(840
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
134,766
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
134,766
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
209,566
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
209,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
218,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The aggregate intangible asset amortization expense was
approximately $0.9 million, $0.4 million and
$0.3 million for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The estimated intangible asset amortization expense for the five
succeeding fiscal years ending after December 31, 2007, is
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
1,338
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,338
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Accounting
for Income Taxes
|
Pre-tax (loss) income consisted of the following for the years
ended December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(15,296
|
)
|
|
$
|
76,336
|
|
|
$
|
70,673
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
10,460
|
|
|
|
9,459
|
|
|
|
7,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(4,836
|
)
|
|
$
|
85,795
|
|
|
$
|
78,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the statutory rates
to the reported income tax provision for the years ended
December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Federal provision at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(1,693
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,028
|
|
|
$
|
27,492
|
|
U.S. tax on foreign income
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
Foreign provision in excess (less) than U.S. tax rate
|
|
|
(941
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
Extraterritorial income exclusion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,169
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
Tax reserves
|
|
|
(1,673
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
80
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
(2,466
|
)
|
|
|
(1,275
|
)
|
|
|
(878
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,745
|
|
|
$
|
29,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The (benefit) provision for income taxes for the years ended
December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
(10,635
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,328
|
|
|
$
|
21,890
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
9,050
|
|
|
|
9,417
|
|
|
|
7,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,745
|
|
|
$
|
29,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of
December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
820
|
|
|
$
|
1,560
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,937
|
|
|
|
2,950
|
|
Warranty costs
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
(2,947
|
)
|
Stock options
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
Accrued benefits
|
|
|
4,942
|
|
|
|
1,830
|
|
Other accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred assets
|
|
$
|
12,989
|
|
|
$
|
8,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and fixed assets
|
|
$
|
(33,062
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,212
|
)
|
Pension obligation
|
|
|
2,076
|
|
|
|
7,629
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
Foreign tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
6,216
|
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(1,290
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Other accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes
|
|
|
(2,919
|
)
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net noncurrent deferred tax (liabilities)
|
|
$
|
(27,076
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,611
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately
$2.6 million of federal and $39.0 million of state net
operating loss carryforwards related to our
U.S. operations. Utilization of these losses is subject to
the tax laws of the applicable tax jurisdiction and our legal
organizational structure, and may be limited by the ability of
certain subsidiaries to generate taxable income in the
associated tax jurisdiction. Our net operating loss
carryforwards expire beginning in 2009 and continue through
2027. The deferred income tax provision consists of the change
in the deferred income tax assets, adjusted for the impact of
the tax benefit on the cumulative effect of the change in
accounting and the tax impact of certain of the other
comprehensive income (loss) items. Deferred taxes have not been
provided on unremitted earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries
that arose in fiscal years ending on or before December 31,
2007. It is not practical to determine the additional tax, if
any, that would result from the remittance of these amounts.
We operate in multiple jurisdictions and are routinely under
audit by federal, state and international tax authorities.
Exposures exist related to various filing positions which may
require an extended period of time to resolve and may result in
income tax adjustments by the taxing authorities. Reserves for
these potential exposures have been established which represent
managements best estimate of the probable adjustments. On
a quarterly basis, management evaluates the reserve amounts in
light of any additional information and adjusts the reserve
balances as necessary to reflect the best estimate of the
probable outcomes. Management believes that we have established
the appropriate reserve for these estimated exposures. However,
actual results may differ from these estimates. The resolution
of these matters in a particular future period could have an
impact on our consolidated statement of operations and provision
for income taxes.
We file federal income tax returns in the United States and
income tax returns in various states and foreign jurisdictions.
With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to income tax
examinations by any of the taxing authorities for years before
2004. There are currently three income tax examinations in
process. We do not anticipate that any adjustments from these
examinations will result in material changes to our consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
73
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 effective
January 1, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, we provided
a liability of approximately $2.7 million of unrecognized
tax benefits related to various federal and state income tax
positions. Of the $2.7 million, the amount that would
impact our effective tax rate, if recognized, is approximately
$1.6 million. The remaining $1.1 million of
unrecognized tax benefits consists of items that are offset by
deferred tax assets subject to valuation allowances, and thus
could further impact the effective tax rate.
We accrue penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax
benefits through income tax expense, which is consistent with
the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods. We
had approximately $0.6 million accrued for the payment of
interest and penalties at December 31, 2007, of which
$0.2 million was accrued during the current year. Accrued
interest and penalties are included in the $2.7 million of
unrecognized tax benefits.
During the current year, we released approximately
$1.9 million of tax reserves which related to tax, interest
and penalties associated with items with expiring statues of
limitations. We anticipate events could occur within the next
12 months that would have an impact on the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits that would be required. Approximately
$0.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits relate to items
that are affected by expiring statutes of limitation within the
next 12 months.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
3,944
|
|
Gross increase tax positions in prior periods
|
|
|
309
|
|
Gross decreases tax positions in prior periods
|
|
|
|
|
Gross increases current period tax positions
|
|
|
313
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(1,871
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, our operating components constitute a single
operating segment due to the manner in which our key decisions
are made as well as the manner in which our operating components
collectively support similar markets and customers, utilize
similar manufacturing and assembly processes and utilize the
same centralized network of personnel.
The following table presents revenues and long-lived assets for
each of the geographic areas in which we operate (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
538,116
|
|
|
$
|
85,817
|
|
|
$
|
800,069
|
|
|
$
|
81,930
|
|
|
$
|
636,448
|
|
|
$
|
74,633
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
132,972
|
|
|
|
5,913
|
|
|
|
106,545
|
|
|
|
5,861
|
|
|
|
105,832
|
|
|
|
4,793
|
|
All other countries
|
|
|
25,698
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
12,137
|
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
12,201
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
696,786
|
|
|
$
|
98,258
|
|
|
$
|
918,751
|
|
|
$
|
90,388
|
|
|
$
|
754,481
|
|
|
$
|
80,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues are attributed to geographic locations based on the
location of where the product is manufactured. Included in all
other countries are intercompany sales eliminations.
74
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary composition by product category of
our revenues (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Seats and seating systems
|
|
$
|
248,098
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
266,401
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
241,941
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Cab structures, sleeper boxes, body panels and structural
components
|
|
|
150,371
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
317,682
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
252,090
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Electronic wire harnesses and panel assemblies
|
|
|
130,863
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
103,417
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
54,966
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Trim systems and components
|
|
|
109,869
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
158,707
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
133,591
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Mirrors, wipers and controls
|
|
|
57,585
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
72,544
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
71,893
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
696,786
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
918,751
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
754,481
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The significant change in the 2007 product categories is
primarily the result of the reduction in Class 8 North
American heavy truck volumes.
|
|
11.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Leases We lease office and manufacturing
space and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating lease
agreements that require us to pay maintenance, insurance, taxes
and other expenses in addition to annual rentals. The
anticipated future lease costs are based in part on certain
assumptions and we will continue to monitor these costs to
determine if the estimates need to be revised in the future.
Lease expense was approximately $11.8 million,
$8.7 million and $8.4 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Capital lease agreements entered into by us are
immaterial in total. Future minimum annual rental commitments at
December 31, 2007 under these operating leases are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
10,227
|
|
2009
|
|
|
8,293
|
|
2010
|
|
|
7,039
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6,012
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5,450
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
23,189
|
|
Litigation We are subject to various legal
actions and claims incidental to our business, including those
arising out of alleged defects, product warranties and
employment-related, income tax and environmental matters.
Management believes that we maintain adequate insurance to cover
these claims. We have established reserves for issues that are
probable and estimatable in amounts management believes are
adequate to cover reasonable adverse judgments not covered by
insurance. Based upon the information available to management
and discussions with legal counsel, it is the opinion of
management that the ultimate outcome of the various legal
actions and claims that are incidental to our business will not
have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows; however, such
matters are subject to many uncertainties and the outcomes of
individual matters are not predictable with assurance.
|
|
12.
|
Stockholders
Investment
|
Common Stock Our authorized capital stock
consists of 30,000,000 shares of common stock with a par
value of $0.01 per share.
75
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Preferred Stock Our authorized capital stock
consists of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par
value of $0.01 per share, with no shares outstanding as of
December 31, 2007.
Earnings Per Share In accordance with
SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, as amended,
basic earnings per share is determined by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the year. Diluted earnings per share, and all other diluted per
share amounts presented, is determined by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares and potential
common shares outstanding during the period as determined by the
Treasury Stock Method, as amended, in SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment. Potential common shares are included
in the diluted earnings per share calculation when dilutive.
Diluted earnings per share for years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005 includes the effects of potential common
shares consisting of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding stock options and the effect of nonvested restricted
stock when dilutive (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net (loss) income applicable to common stockholders
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
58,050
|
|
|
$
|
49,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
21,439
|
|
|
|
21,151
|
|
|
|
19,440
|
|
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and restricted
stock grants after application of the treasury stock method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive shares outstanding
|
|
|
21,439
|
|
|
|
21,545
|
|
|
|
19,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.74
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.69
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, diluted loss per share excludes
approximately 161 thousand of outstanding stock options and
non-vested restricted stock as the effect would have been
anti-dilutive.
Dividends We have not declared or paid any
cash dividends in the past. The terms of our senior credit
agreement restricts the payment or distribution of our cash or
other assets, including cash dividend payments.
|
|
13.
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted
SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective
application transition method. SFAS No. 123(R)
eliminates the intrinsic value method under Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 as an
alternative method of accounting for share-based compensation
arrangements. SFAS No. 123(R) also revises the fair
value-based method of accounting for share-based payment
liabilities, forfeitures and modifications of share-based
compensation arrangements and clarifies the guidance of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, in several areas, including measuring fair
value, classifying an award as equity or as a liability and
attributing compensation cost to reporting periods. Prior to our
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), benefits of tax
deductions in excess of recognized compensation costs were
reported as operating cash flows. SFAS No. 123(R)
amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows, to
require that excess tax benefits be reported as a financing cash
inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid, which is
included within operating cash flows.
We estimate our pre-tax share-based compensation expense to be
approximately $3.9 million in 2008 based on our current
share-based compensation arrangements. The compensation expense
that has been charged against income for those arrangements was
approximately $3.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007. The total income tax benefit recognized
in our consolidated statement of operations for share-based
compensation arrangements was approximately $1.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007. Because we accounted
for our share-based compensation arrangements under APB Opinion
No. 25 prior to adopting SFAS No. 123(R), our net
income for the year ended December 31, 2005 does not
include any compensation expense related to these arrangements.
76
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the year ended December 31, 2006, the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) resulted in incremental share-based
compensation expense of approximately $0.6 million. The
incremental share-based compensation expense caused income
before provision for income taxes to decrease for the year ended
December 31, 2006 by approximately $0.6 million, and
net income to decrease for the year by approximately
$0.4 million. In addition, basic and diluted earnings per
share decreased by $0.02 and $0.02, respectively, for the year
ended December 31, 2006. Cash provided by operating
activities decreased and cash provided by financing activities
increased by approximately $347 thousand for the year ended
December 31, 2006, related to excess tax benefits from
share-based payment arrangements.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and
earnings per share had we applied the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) to awards granted under
our amended and restated equity incentive plan prior to the
adoption of this standard for the year ended December 31,
2005 (in thousands, except per share amounts
unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
$
|
49,411
|
|
(Less): Share-based compensation expense determined under the
the fair-value-based method for all awards, net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
49,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
2.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Grants and Restricted Stock
Awards In 1998, we granted options to purchase
57,902 shares of common stock at $9.43 per share, which are
exercisable through December 2008. The options were granted at
exercise prices determined to be at or above fair value on the
date of grant. As of December 31, 2007, 28,951 of the
initially granted options have been exercised.
In May 2004, we granted options to purchase 910,869 shares
of common stock at $5.54 per share. These options have a
ten-year term and the original terms provided for 50% of the
options becoming exercisable ratably on June 30, 2005 and
June 30, 2006. During June 2004, we modified the terms of
these options such that they became 100% vested immediately.
In October 2004, we granted options to purchase
598,950 shares of common stock at $15.84 per share. These
options have a ten-year term and vest ratably in three equal
annual installments commencing on October 20, 2005. As of
December 31, 2007, there was no amount remaining of
unearned compensation related to nonvested stock options granted
in October 2004 under the amended and restated equity incentive
plan.
In November 2005, 168,700 shares of restricted stock were
awarded by our compensation committee under our Amended and
Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Restricted stock is a grant of
shares of common stock that may not be sold, encumbered or
disposed of, and that may be forfeited in the event of certain
terminations of employment, prior to the end of a restricted
period set by the compensation committee. The shares of
restricted stock granted in November 2005 vest in three equal
annual installments commencing on October 20, 2006. A
participant granted restricted stock generally has all of the
rights of a stockholder, unless the compensation committee
determines otherwise. As of December 31, 2007, there was
approximately $1.1 million of unearned compensation related
to nonvested restricted stock awarded in 2005 under the amended
and restated equity incentive plan. This expense is
77
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
subject to future adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and
will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
period of 10 months.
In November 2006, 207,700 shares of restricted stock were
awarded by our compensation committee under our Amended and
Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Restricted stock is a grant of
shares of common stock that may not be sold, encumbered or
disposed of, and that may be forfeited in the event of certain
terminations of employment, prior to the end of a restricted
period set by the compensation committee. The shares of
restricted stock granted in November 2006 vest in three equal
annual installments commencing on October 20, 2007. A
participant granted restricted stock generally has all of the
rights of a stockholder, unless the compensation committee
determines otherwise. As of December 31, 2007, there was
approximately $2.8 million of unearned compensation related
to nonvested restricted stock awarded in 2006 under the amended
and restated equity incentive plan. This expense is subject to
future adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and will be
recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining period of
22 months.
In February 2007, 10,000 shares of restricted stock and in
March 2007, 10,000 shares of restricted stock were awarded
by our compensation committee under our Amended and Restated
Equity Incentive Plan. The shares of restricted stock granted in
February 2007 and March 2007 vest ratably in three equal annual
installments commencing on October 20, 2007. A participant
granted restricted stock generally has all of the rights of a
stockholder, unless the compensation committee determines
otherwise. As of December 31, 2007, there was approximately
$0.2 million of unearned compensation related to nonvested
restricted stock awarded in 2007 under the amended and restated
equity incentive plan. This expense is subject to future
adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and will be recognized
on a straight-line basis over the remaining period of
22 months.
In October 2007, 328,900 shares of restricted stock were
awarded by our compensation committee under our Second Amended
and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Restricted stock is a grant
of shares of common stock that may not be sold, encumbered or
disposed of, and that may be forfeited in the event of certain
terminations of employment, prior to the end of a restricted
period set by the compensation committee. The shares of
restricted stock granted in October 2007 vest in three equal
annual installments commencing on October 20, 2008. A
participant granted restricted stock generally has all of the
rights of a stockholder, unless the compensation committee
determines otherwise. As of December 31, 2007, there was
approximately $4.2 million of unearned compensation related
to nonvested restricted stock awarded in 2007 under the second
amended and restated equity incentive plan. This expense is
subject to future adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and
will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
period of 34 months.
We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the
fair value of equity-based stock option grants with the
following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of option and restricted stock grants
|
|
$
|
3.34
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
23.12
|
%
|
Expected life in months
|
|
|
36
|
|
We currently estimate the forfeiture rate for our October 2004
stock option grants, November 2005 restricted stock awards,
November 2006, February/March and October 2007 restricted stock
awards at 13.9%, 15.0%, 13.3%, 0.0% and 10.0%, respectively, for
all participants of each plan.
78
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the status of our stock options as of
December 31, 2007 and changes during the twelve-month
period ending December 31, 2007 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Value (000s)
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
$
|
11.94
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
8,588
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
10.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
12.45
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
12.45
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, expected to vest at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.84
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about the nonvested
stock options and restricted stock grants as of
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested Stock Options
|
|
|
Nonvested Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
20.21
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
13.78
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
20.11
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
19.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
$
|
16.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We expect employees to surrender approximately 22 thousand
shares of our common stock in connection with the vesting of
restricted stock during 2008 to satisfy income tax withholding
obligations.
As of December 31, 2007, a total of 798,598 shares
were available from the 2.0 million shares authorized for
award under our Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive
Plan, including cumulative forfeitures.
Repurchase of Common Stock During 2007, we
did not repurchase any shares of common stock.
|
|
14.
|
Defined
Contribution Plans, Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
Plans
|
Defined Contribution Plans We sponsor various
401(k) employee savings plans covering all eligible employees,
as defined. Eligible employees can contribute on a pre-tax basis
to the plan. In accordance with the terms of the 401(k) plans,
we elect to match a certain percentage of the participants
contributions to the plans, as defined. We recognized expense
associated with these plans of approximately $1.7 million,
$1.5 million and $1.2 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
Plans We sponsor pension and other
post-retirement benefit plans that cover certain hourly and
salaried employees in the United States and United Kingdom. Our
policy is to make annual contributions to the plans to fund the
normal cost as required by local regulations. In addition, we
have a post-retirement benefit plan for certain
U.S. operations, retirees and their dependents.
79
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).
SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the
funded status of defined benefit pension and other
post-retirement benefit plans as an asset or liability in our
consolidated balance sheet and to recognize changes in that
funded status in the year in which the changes occur through
accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders
investment. SFAS No. 158 also requires that, beginning
in 2008, our assumptions used to measure our annual defined
benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans be
determined as of the balance sheet date, and all plan assets and
liabilities be reported as of that date. Currently, the
assumptions used to measure our annual defined benefit pension
and other post-retirement benefit plan expenses are determined
as of October 1 or December 31 (measurement dates) for our
various plans, and all plan assets and liabilities are generally
reported as of those dates. In accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 158, prior year amounts have not been
adjusted.
The change in benefit obligation, plan assets and funded status
as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Retirement
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation Beginning of year
|
|
$
|
30,622
|
|
|
$
|
30,664
|
|
|
$
|
47,067
|
|
|
$
|
39,850
|
|
|
$
|
2,447
|
|
|
$
|
4,398
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
2,253
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
Curtailment (gain)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,057
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,008
|
)
|
|
|
(1,001
|
)
|
|
|
(3,365
|
)
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
Exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
5,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
31,002
|
|
|
|
30,622
|
|
|
|
47,076
|
|
|
|
47,067
|
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets Beginning of year
|
|
|
20,588
|
|
|
|
19,722
|
|
|
|
37,013
|
|
|
|
29,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
4,476
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
3,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions/divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,008
|
)
|
|
|
(1,001
|
)
|
|
|
(3,365
|
)
|
|
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
Risk benefit insurance premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
4,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
26,256
|
|
|
|
20,588
|
|
|
|
35,649
|
|
|
|
37,013
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
(4,746
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,034
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,427
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,054
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,688
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at
December 31 consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Retirement
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
$
|
292
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
4,746
|
|
|
|
10,034
|
|
|
|
11,427
|
|
|
|
10,054
|
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
2,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
4,746
|
|
|
$
|
10,034
|
|
|
$
|
11,427
|
|
|
$
|
10,054
|
|
|
$
|
2,688
|
|
|
$
|
2,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at
December 31 consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Retirement
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain), net of tax
|
|
$
|
1,654
|
|
|
$
|
(823
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,133
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,008
|
)
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
Defined benefits plans with a projected benefit obligation and
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at
December 31 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
31,002
|
|
|
$
|
30,622
|
|
|
$
|
47,076
|
|
|
$
|
47,067
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
31,002
|
|
|
$
|
30,622
|
|
|
$
|
47,076
|
|
|
$
|
47,067
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
26,256
|
|
|
$
|
20,588
|
|
|
$
|
35,649
|
|
|
$
|
37,013
|
|
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended
December 31 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Post-Retirement
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
|
$
|
628
|
|
|
$
|
952
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
2,253
|
|
|
|
1,862
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,539
|
)
|
|
|
(1,649
|
)
|
|
|
(1,419
|
)
|
|
|
(2,178
|
)
|
|
|
(2,030
|
)
|
|
|
(1,931
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
Curtailment (gain) loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,057
|
)
|
|
|
(3,097
|
)
|
Special Termination Benefits
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net benefit cost (gain)
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
(1,227
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
|
$
|
314
|
|
|
$
|
906
|
|
|
$
|
1,273
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
(1,625
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,947
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations
Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income
Amounts recognized as other changes in plan assets and benefit
obligations in other comprehensive income at December 31 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Post-Retirement
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
$
|
(3,919
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,066
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Amortization of actuarial (gain)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
(3,919
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,875
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated actuarial loss for the defined benefit pension
plans that will be amortized from accumulated other
comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the
next fiscal year are $0.3 million. The estimated actuarial
gain for the other post-retirement benefit plans that will be
amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net
periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are $22 thousand.
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations at December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Post-Retirement
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.50-5.75
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost at December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Post-Retirement
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension Plans
|
|
|
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.66
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.50-5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.66-5.75
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
%
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
We employ a total return investment approach whereby a mix of
equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the
long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk. The
intent of this strategy is to minimize plan expenses by
outperforming plan liabilities over the long run. Risk tolerance
is established through careful consideration of plan
liabilities, plan funded status and corporate financial
condition. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend
of equity and fixed income investments. Furthermore, equity
investments are diversified across U.S. and
non-U.S. stocks
as well as growth, value and small and large capitalizations.
Other assets such as real estate, private equity and hedge funds
are used judiciously to enhance long-term returns while
improving portfolio diversification. Derivatives may be used to
gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner; however,
derivatives may not be used to leverage the portfolio beyond the
market value of the underlying investments. Investment risk is
measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through annual
liability measurements, periodic asset/liability studies and
quarterly investment portfolio reviews. We expect to contribute
$2.7 million to our pension plans and $0.5 million to
our other post-retirement benefit plans in 2008.
82
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our current investment allocation target for our pension plans
for 2008 and our weighted-average asset allocations of our
pension assets for the years ended December 31, by asset
category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Allocation
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
For measurement purposes, a 10.0% annual rate of increase in the
per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for
2007. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5.5% through
2013 and remain constant thereafter. Assumed health care cost
trend rates can have a significant effect on the amounts
reported for other post-retirement benefit plans.
Differences in the ultimate health care cost trend rates within
the range indicated below would have had the following impact on
2007 other post-retirement benefit results (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Percentage
|
|
|
1 Percentage
|
|
|
|
Point Increase
|
|
|
Point Decrease
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) from change in health care cost trend rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other post-retirement benefit expense
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
Other post-retirement benefit liability
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
The following table summarizes our expected future benefit
payments of our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Post-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
Year
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
2,159
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
2,429
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
2,641
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
2,938
|
|
|
$
|
410
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
3,313
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
2013 to 2017
|
|
$
|
21,412
|
|
|
$
|
591
|
|
During 2005, we elected to freeze the pension plan for Mayflower
salaried employees. This action was undertaken by us in an
effort to minimize future liabilities and as part of the
integration process.
During 2005, we also elected to terminate the Mayflower medical
and dental post-retirement plan. This action was undertaken by
us in an effort to minimize future liabilities and as part of
the integration process. As a result of this action, we recorded
a curtailment gain of approximately $3.1 million which is
included in the consolidated financial statements of operations
for the year ending December 31, 2005.
During 2006, we elected to freeze our salaried pension and other
post-retirement benefits plans at our United States and United
Kingdom based operations. This action was undertaken by us in an
effort to minimize future liabilities.
83
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
We entered into the following related party transactions during
the three years ended December 31, 2007:
On January 31, 2005, we entered into an advisory agreement
with Hidden Creek Partners, LLC (HCP), (formerly
Hidden Creek Industries (HCI)), pursuant to which
HCP agreed to assist us in financing activities, strategic
initiatives and acquisitions in exchange for an annual fee. In
addition, the Company agreed to pay HCP a transaction fee for
services rendered that relate to transactions we may enter into
from time to time, in an amount that is negotiated between our
Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer and approved
by our Board of Directors. All of the principals of HCP are
employees and managing directors of Thayer Capital Partners
(Thayer). Scott D. Rued, our Chairman, is a managing
partner of Thayer and Richard A. Snell, a member of our Board of
Directors and our Compensation Committee Chairman, is an
operating partner of Thayer. Thayer Capital, Scott D. Rued and
Richard A. Snell are neither a party to, nor have any direct or
indirect financial interest in the advisory agreement between us
and HCP. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, we made payments under these arrangements of approximately
$0.2 million, $0.3 million and $1.8 million,
respectively. This agreement has not been renewed for 2008.
On May 1, 2004, we entered into a Product Sourcing
Assistance Agreement with Baird Asia Limited (BAL),
an affiliate of Baird Capital Partners III L.P. Pursuant to
the agreement, BAL assisted us in procuring materials and parts
from Asia, including the countries of China, Malaysia, Hong Kong
and Taiwan. BAL received as compensation a percentage of the
price of the materials and parts supplied to us, of at least 2%
of the price but not exceeding 10% of the price, to be
determined on a
case-by-case
basis. For the year ended December 31, 2005, we incurred
expenses of approximately $3.1 million for the value of
goods and services purchased under this agreement. In connection
with the sale of stock during 2005, BAL was no longer a related
party as of and subsequent to December 31, 2005.
|
|
16.
|
Consolidating
Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Financial Information
|
The following consolidating financial information presents
balance sheets, statements of operations and cash flow
information related to our business. Each guarantor, as defined,
is a direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary and has fully
and unconditionally guaranteed the subordinated notes issued by
us, on a joint and several basis. Separate financial statements
and other disclosures concerning the guarantors have not been
presented because management believes that such information is
not material to investors.
The parent company includes all of the wholly-owned subsidiaries
accounted for under the equity method. The guarantor and
non-guarantor companies include the consolidated financial
results of their wholly-owned subsidiaries accounted for under
the equity method. All applicable corporate expenses have been
allocated appropriately among the guarantor and non-guarantor
subsidiaries.
84
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,349
|
|
|
$
|
8,518
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,867
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,842
|
|
|
|
34,824
|
|
|
|
(169,979
|
)
|
|
|
107,687
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,757
|
|
|
|
38,238
|
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
96,385
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,175
|
|
|
|
7,914
|
|
|
|
5,419
|
|
|
|
16,508
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,223
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
(2,858
|
)
|
|
|
12,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,346
|
|
|
|
90,118
|
|
|
|
(168,028
|
)
|
|
|
243,436
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,817
|
|
|
|
12,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,258
|
|
INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
417,428
|
|
|
|
(100,082
|
)
|
|
|
45,502
|
|
|
|
(362,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,787
|
|
|
|
37,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,189
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,800
|
|
|
|
13,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,575
|
|
OTHER ASSETS, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,631
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,172
|
|
|
|
3,323
|
|
|
|
(7,495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
417,428
|
|
|
$
|
517,471
|
|
|
$
|
202,561
|
|
|
$
|
(538,371
|
)
|
|
$
|
599,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,923
|
|
|
|
42,089
|
|
|
|
(169,979
|
)
|
|
|
93,033
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,128
|
|
|
|
9,426
|
|
|
|
2,561
|
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,167
|
|
|
|
51,515
|
|
|
|
(167,418
|
)
|
|
|
126,264
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,581
|
|
|
|
25,744
|
|
|
|
(25,716
|
)
|
|
|
159,609
|
|
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,387
|
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
(7,495
|
)
|
|
|
27,076
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,614
|
|
|
|
13,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444,749
|
|
|
|
89,634
|
|
|
|
(200,629
|
)
|
|
|
333,754
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
|
|
|
417,428
|
|
|
|
72,722
|
|
|
|
112,927
|
|
|
|
(337,742
|
)
|
|
|
265,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
|
|
$
|
417,428
|
|
|
$
|
517,471
|
|
|
$
|
202,561
|
|
|
$
|
(538,371
|
)
|
|
$
|
599,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
REVENUES
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
526,588
|
|
|
$
|
182,737
|
|
|
$
|
(12,539
|
)
|
|
$
|
696,786
|
|
COST OF REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,273
|
|
|
|
156,065
|
|
|
|
(11,193
|
)
|
|
|
620,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,315
|
|
|
|
26,672
|
|
|
|
(1,346
|
)
|
|
|
76,641
|
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,885
|
|
|
|
15,567
|
|
|
|
(959
|
)
|
|
|
55,493
|
|
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
RESTRUCTURING COSTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,585
|
|
|
|
10,623
|
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
18,821
|
|
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
|
|
9,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,361
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE (INCOME)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,212
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,147
|
|
LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,078
|
)
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
(4,836
|
)
|
BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
(1,378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,871
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,007
|
|
|
$
|
(387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,871
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,007
|
|
|
$
|
(387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,251
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,191
|
|
|
|
3,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,425
|
|
Noncash amortization of debt financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,084
|
|
Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,482
|
|
|
|
(3,791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,691
|
|
Noncash loss on forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,967
|
|
Change in other operating items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
7,474
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
10,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,547
|
|
|
|
19,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,882
|
)
|
|
|
(3,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,981
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal/sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
Proceeds from disposal/sale of other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-acquisition and acquisitions payments, net of cash received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,281
|
)
|
|
|
(23,768
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,049
|
)
|
Other asset and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,651
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
25,716
|
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,432
|
)
|
|
|
(26,576
|
)
|
|
|
25,716
|
|
|
|
(53,292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under equity incentive
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock from employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
Excess tax benefit from equity incentive plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
Repayment of revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120,500
|
)
|
|
|
(8,990
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129,490
|
)
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
33,237
|
|
|
|
(25,716
|
)
|
|
|
137,521
|
|
Repayments of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,295
|
)
|
Payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,379
|
|
|
|
13,943
|
|
|
|
(25,716
|
)
|
|
|
(2,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,413
|
)
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,843
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,919
|
)
|
|
|
6,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,954
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,268
|
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,349
|
|
|
$
|
8,518
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,268
|
|
|
$
|
1,553
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,821
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,244
|
|
|
|
31,356
|
|
|
|
(56,129
|
)
|
|
|
123,471
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,337
|
|
|
|
22,610
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
88,723
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,984
|
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
11,469
|
|
|
|
24,272
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,570
|
|
|
|
(2,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251,403
|
|
|
|
58,587
|
|
|
|
(44,884
|
)
|
|
|
265,106
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,930
|
|
|
|
8,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,388
|
|
INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
400,817
|
|
|
|
10,602
|
|
|
|
11,987
|
|
|
|
(423,406
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,033
|
|
|
|
30,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,766
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,188
|
|
OTHER ASSETS, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,761
|
|
|
|
8,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,374
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,624
|
|
|
|
3,323
|
|
|
|
(11,947
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
400,817
|
|
|
$
|
548,541
|
|
|
$
|
121,701
|
|
|
$
|
(480,237
|
)
|
|
$
|
590,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,158
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,158
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,398
|
|
|
|
19,341
|
|
|
|
(56,129
|
)
|
|
|
86,610
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,661
|
|
|
|
3,840
|
|
|
|
11,469
|
|
|
|
40,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,217
|
|
|
|
23,181
|
|
|
|
(44,660
|
)
|
|
|
129,738
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,156
|
|
|
|
11,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,956
|
|
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,374
|
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
(11,947
|
)
|
|
|
10,611
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,556
|
|
|
|
10,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,303
|
|
|
|
44,221
|
|
|
|
(56,607
|
)
|
|
|
325,917
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
|
|
|
400,817
|
|
|
|
210,238
|
|
|
|
77,480
|
|
|
|
(423,630
|
)
|
|
|
264,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
|
|
$
|
400,817
|
|
|
$
|
548,541
|
|
|
$
|
121,701
|
|
|
$
|
(480,237
|
)
|
|
$
|
590,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
789,952
|
|
|
$
|
134,978
|
|
|
$
|
(6,179
|
)
|
|
$
|
918,751
|
|
COST OF REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661,519
|
|
|
|
112,738
|
|
|
|
(5,344
|
)
|
|
|
768,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,433
|
|
|
|
22,240
|
|
|
|
(835
|
)
|
|
|
149,838
|
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,487
|
|
|
|
13,153
|
|
|
|
(690
|
)
|
|
|
51,950
|
|
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,532
|
|
|
|
9,087
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
97,474
|
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
(4,223
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,468
|
)
|
INTEREST EXPENSE (INCOME)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,963
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,829
|
|
LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,532
|
|
|
|
13,408
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
85,795
|
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,002
|
|
|
|
3,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
48,530
|
|
|
$
|
9,665
|
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
|
$
|
58,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
48,530
|
|
|
$
|
9,665
|
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
|
$
|
58,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,906
|
|
|
|
2,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash amortization of debt financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and post-retirement curtailment (gain) loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,007
|
)
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,616
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash gain on forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,203
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,203
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in other operating items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,477
|
)
|
|
|
(2,682
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(40,014
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,018
|
|
|
|
6,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,070
|
)
|
|
|
(2,257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal/sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal/sale of other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-acquisition and acquisitions payments, net of cash received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
(8,818
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,452
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other asset and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,080
|
)
|
|
|
(10,273
|
)
|
|
|
20,123
|
|
|
|
(1,230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,420
|
)
|
|
|
(21,328
|
)
|
|
|
20,123
|
|
|
|
(27,625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under equity incentive
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock from employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from equity incentive plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,300
|
)
|
|
|
(13,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,711
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,300
|
|
|
|
11,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,590
|
)
|
|
|
(1,620
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,123
|
|
|
|
(20,123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,018
|
)
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
|
|
(20,123
|
)
|
|
|
(27,952
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(465
|
)
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,885
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,820
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,153
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,268
|
|
|
$
|
1,553
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
REVENUES
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
633,725
|
|
|
$
|
124,751
|
|
|
$
|
(3,995
|
)
|
|
$
|
754,481
|
|
COST OF REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520,209
|
|
|
|
103,366
|
|
|
|
(3,544
|
)
|
|
|
620,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,516
|
|
|
|
21,385
|
|
|
|
(451
|
)
|
|
|
134,450
|
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,909
|
|
|
|
12,027
|
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
44,564
|
|
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,249
|
|
|
|
9,358
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
89,528
|
|
OTHER INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(3,735
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,741
|
)
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,742
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,195
|
|
LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,988
|
|
|
|
11,640
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
78,549
|
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,199
|
|
|
|
3,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,789
|
|
|
$
|
7,701
|
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
$
|
49,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,789
|
|
|
$
|
7,701
|
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
$
|
49,411
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,064
|
|
Noncash amortization of debt financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Pension and post-retirement curtailment (gain)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,097
|
)
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,134
|
|
|
|
2,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,248
|
|
Noncash gain on forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,793
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,793
|
)
|
Change in other operating items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,236
|
|
|
|
(26,358
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(20,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,452
|
|
|
|
(18,296
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,892
|
)
|
|
|
(2,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,957
|
)
|
Post-acquisition and acquisitions payments, net of cash received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(171,076
|
)
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170,851
|
)
|
Other asset and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(186,729
|
)
|
|
|
(1,840
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,914
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under equity incentive
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
Repayment of revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,068
|
)
|
|
|
(20,381
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(207,449
|
)
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,068
|
|
|
|
19,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,778
|
|
Repayments of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237,008
|
)
|
|
|
(1,328
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238,336
|
)
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,459
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 8% senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,714
|
)
|
|
|
22,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,492
|
|
|
|
20,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,456
|
)
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,889
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,759
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,245
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,153
|
|
|
$
|
1,488
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
17.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited):
|
The following is a condensed summary of actual quarterly results
of operations for 2007 and 2006 (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
per Share(1)
|
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
198,801
|
|
|
$
|
26,269
|
|
|
$
|
10,612
|
|
|
$
|
2,959
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
Second
|
|
$
|
158,566
|
|
|
$
|
16,619
|
|
|
$
|
752
|
|
|
$
|
(231
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Third
|
|
$
|
160,918
|
|
|
$
|
17,819
|
|
|
$
|
2,803
|
|
|
$
|
(2,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
Fourth
|
|
$
|
178,501
|
|
|
$
|
15,934
|
|
|
$
|
4,654
|
|
|
$
|
(3,297
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
229,345
|
|
|
$
|
38,734
|
|
|
$
|
25,477
|
|
|
$
|
13,408
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
Second
|
|
$
|
234,787
|
|
|
$
|
40,197
|
|
|
$
|
26,847
|
|
|
$
|
15,494
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
Third
|
|
$
|
235,841
|
|
|
$
|
40,797
|
|
|
$
|
27,399
|
|
|
$
|
18,006
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
Fourth
|
|
$
|
218,778
|
|
|
$
|
30,110
|
|
|
$
|
17,751
|
|
|
$
|
11,142
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 13 for discussion on the computation of diluted
shares outstanding. |
The sum of the per share amounts for the quarters does not equal
the total for the year due to the application of the treasury
stock methods.
On March 11, 2008, we finalized the sale of our facility in
Seattle, Washington which was primarily used for manufacturing
operations. The closure of this facility was previously
announced on May 22, 2007.
93
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
There were no changes in or disagreements with our independent
accountants on matters of accounting and financial disclosures.
Item 9A. Controls
and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2007, our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and were
effective.
94
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal
control over financial reporting is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or
under the supervision of our principal executive and principal
financial officers and effected by our board of directors,
management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. Such internal control includes those policies and
procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets;
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors; and
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.
In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has
determined that, as of December 31, 2007, our internal
control over financial reporting is effective based on those
criteria.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007 has been audited by Deloitte and Touche
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated
in their report which appears in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mervin
Dunn
Mervin
Dunn
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
/s/ Chad
M. Utrup
Chad
M. Utrup
Chief Financial Officer
|
March 13, 2008
95
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2007, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Companys
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
consolidated financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts
and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use,
or disposition of the companys assets that could have a
material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 of
the Company and our report dated March 13, 2008 expressed
an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules and included an
explanatory paragraph that as discussed in Note 9 to the
consolidated financial statements effective January 1,
2007, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for
uncertain income tax provisions.
/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 13, 2008
96
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other
Information
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
A.
|
Directors
of the Registrant
|
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our current directors as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Principal Position(s)
|
|
Scott D. Rued
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Chairman and Director
|
Mervin Dunn
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Scott C. Arves
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Director
|
David R. Bovee
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director
|
Robert C. Griffin
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Director
|
S.A. Johnson
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Director
|
Richard A. Snell
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Director
|
The following biographies describe the business experience of
our directors:
Scott D. Rued has served as a Director since February
2001 and Chairman since April 2002. Since August 2003,
Mr. Rued has served as a Managing Partner of Thayer Capital
Partners (Thayer). Prior to joining Thayer,
Mr. Rued served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Hidden Creek Industries (Hidden Creek) from May 2000
to August 2003. From January 1994 through April 2000,
Mr. Rued served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Hidden Creek.
Scott C. Arves has served as a Director since July 2005.
Since January 2007, Mr. Arves has served as President and
Chief Executive Officer of Transport America, a truckload,
intermodal and logistics services provider. Prior to joining
Transport America, Mr. Arves was President of
Transportation for Schneider National, Inc., a provider of
transportation, logistics and related services, from May 2000 to
July 2006.
David R. Bovee has served as a Director since October
2004. Mr. Bovee served as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc.
(Dura) from January 2001 to March 2005 and from
November 1990 to May 1997. In October 2006, when Mr. Bovee
was no longer affiliated with that company, Dura filed a
voluntary petition for reorganization under the federal
bankruptcy laws. From May 1997 until January 2001,
Mr. Bovee served as Vice President of Business Development.
Mr. Bovee also served as Assistant Secretary for Dura.
Prior to joining Dura, Mr. Bovee served as Vice President
at Wickes in its Automotive Group from 1987 to 1990.
Robert C. Griffin has served as a Director since July
2005. Mr. Griffin has held numerous positions of
responsibility in the financial sector, including Head of
Investment Banking, Americas and Management Committee Member for
Barclays Capital from 2000 to 2002, and prior to that as
the Global Head of Financial Sponsor Coverage for Bank of
America Securities from 1998 to 2000 and Group Executive Vice
President of Bank of America from 1997 to 1998. Mr. Griffin
also currently serves as a Director of Builders FirstSource,
Inc. and Sunair Services Corporation.
97
S.A. (Tony) Johnson has served as a Director
since September 2000. Mr. Johnson is currently a Managing
Partner of OG Partners, a private industrial management company,
and has served in that capacity since 2004. Mr. Johnson
served as the Chairman of Hidden Creek from May 2001 to May 2004
and from 1989 to May 2001 was its Chief Executive Officer and
President. Prior to forming Hidden Creek, Mr. Johnson
served from 1985 to 1989 as Chief Operating Officer of Pentair,
Inc., a diversified industrial company. Mr. Johnson also
currently serves as a Director of Cooper-Standard Automotive,
Inc.
Richard A. Snell has served as a Director since August
2004. Mr. Snell has served as Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Qualitor, Inc. since May 2005 and as an Operating
Partner at Thayer Capital Partners since 2003. Prior to joining
Thayer Capital Partners, Mr. Snell was a consultant from
2000 to 2003 and prior thereto, served as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Federal-Mogul Corporation, an automotive
parts manufacturer, from 1996 to 2000. Prior to joining
Federal-Mogul Corporation, Mr. Snell served as Chief
Executive Officer at Tenneco Automotive, also an automotive
parts manufacturer. Mr. Snell also currently serves as a
Director of Schneider National, Inc.
B. Executive
Officers
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our current executive officers as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Principal Position(s)
|
|
Gerald L. Armstrong
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
President CVG Global Truck
|
W. Gordon Boyd
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
President CVG Global Construction
|
Mervin Dunn
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Kevin R.L. Frailey
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of Business Development
|
Chad M. Utrup
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
James F. Williams
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Vice President of Human Resources
|
The following biographies describe the business experience of
our executive officers:
Gerald L. Armstrong has served as President
CVG Global Truck since November 2006. From April 2004 to
November 2006, Mr. Armstrong served as
President CVG Americas and from July 2002 to April
2004 as Vice President and General Manager of National Seating
and KAB North America. Prior to joining us, Mr. Armstrong
served from 1995 to 2000 and from 2000 to July 2002 as Vice
President and General Manager, respectively, of Gabriel Ride
Control Products, a manufacturer of shock absorbers and related
ride control products for the automotive and light truck
markets, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of ArvinMeritor Inc.
Mr. Armstrong began his service with ArvinMeritor Inc., a
manufacturer of automotive and commercial vehicle components,
modules and systems in 1987, and served in various positions of
increasing responsibility within its light vehicle original
equipment and aftermarket divisions before starting at Gabriel
Ride Control Products. Prior to 1987, Mr. Armstrong held
various positions of increasing responsibility including Quality
Engineer and Senior Quality Supervisor and Quality Manager with
Schlumberger Industries and Hyster Corporation.
W. Gordon Boyd has served as President
CVG Global Construction since November 2006. From June 2005 to
November 2006, Mr. Boyd served as President CVG
International and prior thereto served as our
President Mayflower Vehicle Systems from the time we
completed the acquisition of Mayflower in February 2005.
Mr. Boyd joined Mayflower Vehicle Systems U.K. as
Manufacturing Director in 1993. In 2002, Mr. Boyd became
President and Chief Executive Officer of MVS, Inc.
Mervin Dunn has served as a Director since August 2004
and as our President and Chief Executive Officer since June
2002, and prior thereto served as the President of Trim Systems,
commencing upon his joining us in October 1999. From 1998 to
1999, Mr. Dunn served as the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Bliss Technologies, a heavy metal stamping company.
From 1988 to 1998, Mr. Dunn served in a number of key
leadership roles at Arvin Industries, including Vice President
of Operating Systems (Arvin North America), Vice President of
Quality, and President of Arvin Ride Control. From 1985 to 1988,
Mr. Dunn held several key management positions in
engineering and quality assurance at Johnson Controls Automotive
Group, an automotive trim company, including
Division Quality Manager. From 1980 to 1985, Mr. Dunn
served in a number of management positions for
98
engineering and quality departments of Hyster Corporation, a
manufacturer of heavy lift trucks. Mr. Dunn also currently
serves as a director of Transdigm Group, Inc.
Kevin R.L. Frailey has served as Executive Vice President
of Business Development since February 2007. Prior to joining
us, Mr. Frailey served as General Manager for Joint
Ventures and Business Strategy at ArvinMeritors Emissions
Technologies Group from 2003 to early 2007. From 1988 to 2007,
Mr. Frailey held several key management positions in
engineering, sales and worldwide supplier development at
ArvinMeritor. In addition, during that time Mr. Frailey
served on the board of various joint ventures, most notably
those of Arvin Sango, Inc., and AD Tech Co., Ltd.
Chad M. Utrup has served as the Chief Financial Officer
since January 2003, and prior thereto served as the Vice
President of Finance at Trim Systems since 2000. Prior to
joining us in February 1998, Mr. Utrup served as a project
management group member at Electronic Data Systems. While with
Electronic Data Systems, Mr. Utrups responsibilities
included financial support and implementing cost recovery and
efficiency programs at various Delphi Automotive Systems support
locations.
James F. Williams has served as the Vice President of
Human Resources since August 1999. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Williams served as Corporate Vice President of Human
Resources and Administration for SPECO Corporation from January
1996 to August 1999. From April 1984 to January 1996,
Mr. Williams served in various key human resource
management positions in General Electrics Turbine,
Lighting and Semi Conductor business. In addition,
Mr. Williams served as Manager of Labor Relations and
Personnel Services at Mack Trucks Allentown Corporate
location from 1976 to 1984.
There are no family relationships between any of our directors
or executive officers.
|
|
C.
|
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
|
The information required by Item 10 with respect to
compliance with reporting requirements is incorporated herein by
reference to the section labeled Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance which appears in
CVGs 2008 Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein
by reference to the sections labeled Director
Compensation and Executive Compensation and Other
Matters which appear in CVGs 2008 Proxy Statement
excluding information under the headings Compensation
Discussion and Analysis.
99
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Options to purchase common shares of our common stock have been
granted to certain of our executives and key employees under our
amended and restated equity incentive plan and our management
stock option plan. The following table summarizes the number of
stock options granted, net of forfeitures and exercises, and
shares of restricted stock awarded and issued, net of
forfeitures and shares on which restrictions have lapsed, the
weighted-average exercise price of such stock options and the
number of securities remaining to be issued under all
outstanding equity compensation plans as of December 31,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
Issued upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Under Equity
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights(1)
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
492,184
|
|
|
$
|
15.84
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
520,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Management Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
228,411
|
|
|
$
|
5.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,240,760
|
|
|
$
|
12.03
|
|
|
|
798,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In connection with our merger with Trim Systems, Inc., options
to purchase shares of Trim Systems, Inc.s common stock
were converted into options to purchase shares of our common
stock. Of these, options to purchase an aggregate of
28,951 shares at a weighted-average exercise price of $9.43
per share were outstanding at December 31, 2006. These
options are not included in the table. |
|
(2) |
|
798,598 shares are available for future issuance under our
Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. |
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein
by reference to the sections labeled Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Employee Benefit Plans, which appear in CVGs
2008 Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships, Related Transactions and Director
Independence
|
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein
by reference to the section labeled Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions and
Proposal No. 1 Election of
Directors Director Independence which appears
in CVGs 2008 Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein
by reference to the section labeled Principal Accountant
Fees and Services which appears in CVGs 2008 Proxy
Statement.
100
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statements Schedules
|
|
|
(1)
|
LIST OF
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
The following financial statement schedules of the
Corporation and its subsidiaries are included herein:
Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves.
COMMERCIAL
VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II:
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts:
The transactions in the allowance for doubtful account for the
years ended December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
5,536
|
|
|
$
|
6,087
|
|
|
$
|
2,681
|
|
Acquisition recorded
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
5,076
|
|
|
|
4,246
|
|
|
|
4,287
|
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
(6,915
|
)
|
|
|
(4,963
|
)
|
|
|
(2,194
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of the year
|
|
$
|
3,758
|
|
|
$
|
5,536
|
|
|
$
|
6,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
Purchase Liabilities Recorded in Conjunction with
Acquisitions:
The transactions in the purchase liabilities account recorded in
conjunction with acquisitions for the years ended December 31
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of the year
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
Closure and Consolidation Costs:
The transactions in the facility closure and consolidation costs
account for the years ended December 31 were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
2,013
|
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(1,953
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of the year
|
|
$
|
646
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other schedules for which provision is made in the
applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required
under the related instructions or are inapplicable and,
therefore, have been omitted.
101
The following exhibits are either included in this report or
incorporated herein by reference as indicated below:
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated February 7, 2004, by
and among, CVG Acquisition LLC, Mayflower Vehicle Systems, Inc.,
Mayflower Vehicle Systems Michigan, Inc., Wayne Stamping and
Assembly LLC and Wayne-Orrville Investments LLC (incorporated by
reference to the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on March 15, 2005).
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2005, by and
between Monona Holdings LLC and Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to the Companys current report
on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on June 8, 2005).
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2005, by
and between Trim Systems, Inc. Cabarrus Plastics, Inc. and the
Shareholders listed therein (incorporated by reference to the
Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890)
filed on August 12, 2005).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the
Companys quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on September 17, 2004).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to the Companys quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on September 17, 2004).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Indenture, dated July 6, 2005, among the Company, the
subsidiary guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee, with respect to 8.0% senior notes
due 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to the Companys
current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on July 8, 2005).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 10, 2005, by and
among the Company, Cabarrus Plastics, Inc., the subsidiary
guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association
(incorporated by reference to the Companys current report
on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890)
filed on August 12, 2005).
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 10, 2006,
among the Company, CVG European Holdings, LLC, the subsidiary
guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association
(incorporated by reference to the Companys annual report
on
Form 10-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on March 13, 2007).
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 28, 2007,
among the Company, CVG Oregon, LLC, the subsidiary guarantors
party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association.
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 6, 2005, among
the Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and the
purchasers named therein (incorporated herein by reference to
the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on July 8, 2005).
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Form of senior note (attached as exhibit to Exhibit 4.1).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of
August 10, 2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group,
Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties hereto,
U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on September 17, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
First Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of September 16, 2004, by and among Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to
time parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties
hereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on March 15, 2005).
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Second Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of February 7, 2005, by and among Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to
time parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties
hereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on March 15, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Third Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of June 3, 2005, by and among Commercial Vehicle
Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties thereto,
U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on June 8, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of June 29, 2005, by and among Commercial Vehicle
Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties thereto,
U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Company s current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on July 6, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of July 12, 2005, by and among Commercial Vehicle
Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties thereto,
U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agent for the banks, and Comerica Bank one of the
banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on July 14, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of December 30, 2005, by and among Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to
time parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties
thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agent for the banks, and Comerica Bank, one of
the banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on January 1, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Waiver and Seventh Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan
Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2007, by and among
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from
time to time parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers
from time to time parties thereto, the banks from time to time
parties thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the
banks, as administrative agent for the banks, and Comerica Bank,
one of the banks, as syndication agent for the banks
(incorporated by reference to the Companys quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on August 3, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Eighth Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of June 26, 2007, by and among Commercial Vehicle
Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties thereto,
U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agent for the banks, and Comerica Bank, one of
the banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on August 3, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amendment and Waiver Letter to Revolving Credit and Term Loan
Agreement, dated as of August 16, 2007, by and among
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from
time to time parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers
from time to time parties thereto, the banks from time to time
parties thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the
banks, as administrative agents for the banks, and Comerica
Bank, one of the banks, as syndication agent for the banks
(incorporated by reference to the Companys current report
on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on October 1, 2007).
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Tenth Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of September 28, 2007, by and among Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to
time parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties
thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agents for the banks, and Comerica Bank, one of
the banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on October 1, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Eleventh Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of March 10, 2008, by and among Commercial Vehicle
Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties thereto,
U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agents for the banks, and Comerica Bank, one of
the banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on March 14, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated September 30, 2002, by and
among Bostrom Holding, Inc., Baird Capital Partners II
Limited, BCP II Affiliates Fund Limited Partnership, Baird
Capital II Limited Partnership, Baird Capital
Partners III Limited Partnership, BCP III Special
Affiliates Limited Partnership, BCP III Affiliates
Fund Limited Partnership, Norwest Equity Partners VII, LP
and Hidden Creek Industries (incorporated by reference to the
Companys registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-15708),
filed on May 21, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Form of Subordinated Promissory Note issued by Bostrom Holding,
Inc. in favor of each of BCP II Affiliates Fund Limited
Partnership, Baird Capital II Limited Partnership, Baird
Capital Partners III Limited Partnership, BCP III Special
Affiliates Limited Partnership BCP III Affiliates
Fund Limited Partnership, Norwest Equity Partners VII, LP
and Hidden Creek Industries (incorporated by reference to the
Companys registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-15708),
filed on May 21, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.15*
|
|
Bostrom Holding, Inc. Management Stock Option Plan (incorporated
by reference to the Companys registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-15708),
filed on May 21, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.16*
|
|
Form of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Option pursuant to the
Bostrom Holding, Inc. Management Stock Option Plan (incorporated
by reference to the Companys registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-15708),
filed on May 21, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.17*
|
|
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Companys
quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
(File
No. 000-59890),
filed on May 11, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.18*
|
|
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Second Amended and Restated
Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the
Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890)
filed on May 25, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.19*
|
|
Form of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Option pursuant to the
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Companys
annual report on
Form 10-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on March 15, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Form of Non-Competition Agreement (incorporated by reference to
the Companys registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-15708),
filed on May 21, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Registration Agreement, dated October 5, 2000, by and among
Bostrom Holding, Inc. and the investors listed on
Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated by reference to
the Companys registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-15708),
filed on May 21, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Joinder to Registration Agreement, dated as of March 28,
2003, by and among Bostrom Holding, Inc. and J2R Partners VI,
CVS Partners, LP and CVS Executive Investco LLC (incorporated by
reference to the Companys registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-15708),
filed on May 21,2004).
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Joinder to the Registration Agreement, dated as of May 20,
2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and the prior
stockholders of Trim Systems (incorporated by reference to the
Companys quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on September 17, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.24*
|
|
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. 2007 Bonus Plan (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on March 9, 2007).
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.25*
|
|
Service Agreement, dated March 1, 1993, between Motor
Panels (Coventry) Plc and William Gordon Boyd (incorporated by
reference to the Companys registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-125626),
filed on June 8, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.26*
|
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of June 1,
2004, between Mayflower Vehicle Systems PLC and Mayflower
Vehicle Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the
Companys registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-125626),
filed on June 8, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.27*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to amendment no. 1 to the
Companys registration statement on
Form S-4
(File
No. 333-129368),
filed on December 1, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.28*
|
|
Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement dated
April 5, 2006 with Mervin Dunn (incorporated by reference
to the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on April 7, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.29*
|
|
Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement dated
April 5, 2006 with Gerald L. Armstrong (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on April 7, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.30*
|
|
Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement dated
April 5, 2006 with Chad M. Utrup (incorporated by reference
to the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on April 7, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.31*
|
|
Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement dated
April 5, 2006 with James F. Williams (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on April 7, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.32*
|
|
Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement dated
May 22, 2007 with Kevin R.L. Frailey (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on May 25, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.33*
|
|
Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement dated
May 22, 2007 with William Gordon Boyd (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on May 25, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.34*
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to the
Companys quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
(File
No. 000-50890),
filed on November 6, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.35*
|
|
Form of indemnification agreement with directors and executive
officers.
|
|
10
|
.36*
|
|
Terms of employment for executive officers.
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges.
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification by Mervin Dunn, President and Chief Executive
Officer.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification by Chad M. Utrup, Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required
to be filed as an exhibit to this annual report on
Form 10-K. |
All other items included in an Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are omitted because they are not applicable or the answers
thereto are none.
105
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.
Scott D. Rued
Chairman
Date: March 13, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf
of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ SCOTT
D. RUED
Scott
D. Rued
|
|
Chairman and Director
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MERVIN
DUNN
Mervin
Dunn
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
and Director
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ SCOTT
C. ARVES
Scott
C. Arves
|
|
Director
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DAVID
R. BOVEE
David
R. Bovee
|
|
Director
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT
C. GRIFFIN
Robert
C. Griffin
|
|
Director
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ S.A.
JOHNSON
S.A.
Johnson
|
|
Director
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ RICHARD
A. SNELL
Richard
A. Snell
|
|
Director
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ CHAD
M. UTRUP
Chad
M. Utrup
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
106