10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-5823
CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
36-6169860 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
333 S. Wabash |
|
|
Chicago, Illinois
|
|
60604 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(312) 822-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at April 30, 2009 |
Common Stock, Par value $2.50 |
|
|
269,024,408 |
|
CNA Financial Corporation
Index
CNA Financial Corporation (CNAF)
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums |
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
|
$ |
1,813 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
Realized investment losses, net of participating policyholders
interests |
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
Other revenues |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims, Benefits and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance claims and policyholders benefits |
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Interest |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total claims, benefits and expenses |
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
264 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
200 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax
(expense) benefit of $0 and $0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
199 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to CNAF |
|
$ |
(195 |
) |
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Attributable to CNAF Common Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNAF |
|
$ |
(195 |
) |
|
$ |
188 |
|
Less: Dividend on 2008 Senior Preferred |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNAF common
stockholders |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
188 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to CNAF common
stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to CNAF common stockholders |
|
$ |
(226 |
) |
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share Attributable to CNAF
Common Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNAF common
stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.84 |
) |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to CNAF common
stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to CNAF
common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.84 |
) |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Outstanding Common Stock and Common Stock Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
269.0 |
|
|
|
270.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
269.0 |
|
|
|
270.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
3
CNA Financial Corporation (CNAF)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(185 |
) |
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
(873 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on discontinued operations and other |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Pension and postretirement benefits |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Allocation to participating policyholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
(868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to CNAF |
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
$ |
(679 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
4
CNA Financial Corporation (CNAF)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In millions, except share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities at fair value (amortized cost of $33,189 and $34,155) |
|
$ |
28,461 |
|
|
$ |
28,887 |
|
Equity securities at fair value (cost of $783 and $1,016) |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
Limited partnership investments |
|
|
1,667 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
Other invested assets |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
4,583 |
|
|
|
3,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
35,448 |
|
|
|
35,003 |
|
Cash |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Reinsurance receivables (less allowance for uncollectible receivables of $365 and $366) |
|
|
7,180 |
|
|
|
7,395 |
|
Insurance receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $221 and $221) |
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
Receivables for securities sold and collateral |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
Federal income tax recoverable (includes $318 and $299 due from Loews Corporation) |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
3,413 |
|
|
|
3,493 |
|
Property and equipment at cost (less accumulated depreciation of $550 and $641) |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
Separate account business |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
51,777 |
|
|
$ |
51,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claim and claim adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
27,243 |
|
|
$ |
27,593 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
3,461 |
|
|
|
3,406 |
|
Future policy benefits |
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
|
7,529 |
|
Policyholders funds |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
Collateral on loaned securities and derivatives |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Payables for securities purchased |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Participating policyholders funds |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Long term debt |
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
2,058 |
|
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
2,659 |
|
|
|
2,824 |
|
Separate account business |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
44,288 |
|
|
|
44,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes D, E, G, H, and J) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (12,500,000 shares authorized)
2008 Senior Preferred (no par value; $100,000 stated value; 12,500 shares issued;
held by Loews Corporation) |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
Common stock ($2.50 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 273,040,243 shares
issued; and 269,024,408 shares outstanding) |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
6,619 |
|
|
|
6,845 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(3,536 |
) |
|
|
(3,924 |
) |
Treasury stock (4,015,835 shares), at cost |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
Notes receivable for the issuance of common stock |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CNAF stockholders equity |
|
|
7,052 |
|
|
|
6,877 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
7,489 |
|
|
|
7,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
51,777 |
|
|
$ |
51,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
5
CNA Financial Corporation (CNAF)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(185 |
) |
|
$ |
199 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Trading portfolio activity |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
Realized investment losses, net of participating policyholders
interests |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Undistributed losses of equity method investees |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Net amortization of bond discount |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Federal income taxes recoverable |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
Insurance reserves |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities-continuing operations |
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided (used) by operating activities-discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities-total |
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
(7,079 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,231 |
) |
Proceeds from fixed maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
7,046 |
|
|
|
10,262 |
|
Maturities, calls and redemptions |
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
Purchases of equity securities |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of equity securities |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Change in short term investments |
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
(696 |
) |
Change in collateral on loaned securities and derivatives |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
Change in other investments |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided (used) by investing activities-continuing operations |
|
$ |
(159 |
) |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided (used) by investing activities-discontinued operations |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided (used) by investing activities-total |
|
$ |
(150 |
) |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
Dividends paid to Loews Corporation for 2008 Senior Preferred |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
Return of investment contract account balances |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Receipts on investment contract account balances |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used by financing activities-continuing operations |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided (used) by financing activities-discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used by financing activities-total |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash-continuing operations |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, beginning of year |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of period |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-continuing operations |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
Cash-discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-total |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
7
CNA Financial Corporation (CNAF)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning and end of period |
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning and end of period |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
2,169 |
|
Stock-based compensation and other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
6,845 |
|
|
|
7,285 |
|
Dividends paid to common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
Dividends paid to Loews Corporation for 2008 Senior Preferred |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to CNAF |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
6,619 |
|
|
|
7,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(3,924 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to CNAF |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
(3,536 |
) |
|
|
(763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Receivable for the Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in notes receivable for the issuance of common stock |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CNAF Stockholders Equity |
|
|
7,052 |
|
|
|
9,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
Net income |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
$ |
7,489 |
|
|
$ |
9,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
8
CNA Financial Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note A. Basis of Presentation
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) include the accounts of CNA Financial
Corporation (CNAF) and its controlled subsidiaries. Collectively, CNAF and its subsidiaries are
referred to as CNA or the Company. CNAs property and casualty and the remaining life & group
insurance operations are primarily conducted by Continental Casualty Company (CCC), The Continental
Insurance Company (CIC), Continental Assurance Company (CAC) and CNA Surety Corporation (CNA
Surety). The Company owned approximately 62% of the outstanding common stock of CNA Surety as of
March 31, 2009. Loews Corporation (Loews) owned approximately 90% of the outstanding common stock
of CNAF as of March 31, 2009.
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Certain financial
information that is normally included in annual financial statements, including certain financial
statement notes, prepared in accordance with GAAP, is not required for interim reporting purposes
and has been condensed or omitted. These statements should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in CNAFs Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the year ended December 31, 2008. The preparation of
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual
results may differ from those estimates.
The interim financial data as of March 31, 2009 and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008 is unaudited. However, in the opinion of management, the interim data includes all
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair statement of the
Companys results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the interim periods are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. All significant
intercompany amounts have been eliminated.
Note B. Accounting Pronouncements
Adopted in the first quarter of 2009
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (SFAS
160)
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS 160, which provides
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that an ownership interest in a subsidiary should be
reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. It also requires consolidated net
income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the
noncontrolling interest. The Company adopted SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this
standard had no impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations, but impacted
the presentation of these amounts within the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161)
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, which amends SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and requires enhanced disclosures regarding the use of
derivative instruments, how they
9
are accounted for and how they affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and
cash flows. The Companys adoption of SFAS 161 on January 1, 2009 had no impact on its financial
condition or results of operations. The Company has complied with the additional disclosure
requirements in Note E.
FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP FAS
157-2)
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurement (SFAS 157) for all non-recurring fair value measurements of
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities until the fiscal year beginning after November 15,
2008. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 as it relates to reporting units and
indefinite-lived intangible assets measured at fair value for the purposes of goodwill and
intangible asset impairment testing as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of these provisions had no
impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements to be adopted
FSP FAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value
of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, which amends FASB Statement No. 107,
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair
value of financial instruments in interim as well as annual financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1
and APB 28-1 is effective for interim and fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2009. The
Companys adoption of this standard will not impact the financial condition or results of
operations of the Company.
FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, which amends the criteria for the
recognition of other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses for debt securities and requires that
credit losses be recognized in earnings and losses resulting from factors other than credit of the
issuer be recognized in other comprehensive income. Prior to adoption, all OTTI losses are
recorded in earnings in the period of recognition. This FSP also expands and increases the
frequency of existing disclosures. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009, and requires a cumulative effect adjustment of initially
applying the FSP as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings with a corresponding
adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company is currently assessing the impact
FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 will have on its financial condition and results of operations.
FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP
FAS 157-4)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, which requires entities to assess whether certain
factors exist that indicate that the volume and level of market activity for an asset or liability
have decreased or that transactions are not orderly. If, after evaluating those factors, the
evidence indicates there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity in
relation to normal market activity, observed transactional values or quoted prices may not be
determinative of fair value and adjustment to the observed transactional values or quoted prices
may be necessary to estimate fair value. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the impact FSP FAS 157-4 will have
on its financial condition and results of operations.
10
Note C. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to CNAFs common stockholders is based on weighted average
outstanding shares. Basic earnings (loss) per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing
net income (loss) attributable to CNAF by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
As a result of the net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2009, no potential shares
attributable to exercises under stock-based employee compensation plans were included in the
calculation of loss per share as the effect would have been antidilutive.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, 100 thousand potential shares attributable to exercises
under stock-based employee compensation plans were included in the calculation of diluted earnings
per share. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, less than 1 million potential shares
attributable to exercises under stock-based employee compensation plans were not included in the
calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effect was antidilutive.
The 2008 Senior Preferred Stock (2008 Senior Preferred) was issued in November 2008 and accrues
cumulative dividends at an initial rate of 10% per year. If declared, dividends are payable
quarterly and any dividends not declared or paid when due will be compounded quarterly. Dividends
of $31 million on the 2008 Senior Preferred were declared and paid for the three months ended March
31, 2009.
No common stock dividends were declared or paid in the first quarter of 2009. Dividends of $0.15
per share of common stock were declared and paid in the first quarter of 2008.
11
Note D. Investments
The significant components of net investment income are presented in the following table.
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
475 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Limited partnerships |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Trading portfolio (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross investment income |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
Investment expense |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
420 |
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The change in net unrealized losses on trading securities included in net investment
income was $13 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. As of March 31, 2009,
the Company no longer has a trading portfolio. |
12
Net realized investment gains (losses) are presented in the following table.
Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains: |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
Gross realized losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
Transactions |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses on fixed maturity securities |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains: |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Gross realized losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Transactions |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses on equity securities |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
Other |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses, net of participating policyholders interests |
|
$ |
(532 |
) |
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, OTTI losses of $614 million were recorded primarily in
the non-redeemable preferred securities, asset-backed bonds and corporate and other taxable bonds
sectors. This compared to OTTI losses for the three months ended March 31, 2008 of $86 million
recorded primarily in the asset-backed bond sector.
The OTTI losses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were driven primarily by further
deterioration in certain sectors of the investment portfolio, the continued disruption of the
financial and credit markets and the Companys change in outlook of economic conditions. These
circumstances were evidenced by rating agency downgrades and deterioration of underlying collateral
in certain asset-backed securities.
An investment is impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its cost adjusted for
accretion, amortization and OTTI losses, otherwise defined as an unrealized loss. When an
investment is impaired, the impairment is evaluated to determine whether it is temporary or
other-than-temporary.
Significant judgment is required in the determination of whether an OTTI has occurred for an
investment. The Company follows a consistent and systematic process for determining and recording
an OTTI loss. The Company has established a committee responsible for the OTTI process. This
committee, referred to as the Impairment Committee, is made up of three officers appointed by the
Companys Chief Financial Officer. The Impairment Committee is responsible for analyzing all
securities in an unrealized loss position on at least a quarterly basis.
The Impairment Committees assessment of whether an OTTI loss has occurred incorporates both
quantitative and qualitative information. The Impairment Committee considers a number of factors
including, but not limited to: (a) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has
been less than amortized cost, (b) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer,
(c) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment for a period of time sufficient
to allow for an anticipated recovery in value, (d) whether the debtor is current on interest and
principal payments and (e) general market conditions and industry or sector specific outlook.
As part of the Impairment Committees review of impaired asset-backed securities it also considers
results and analysis of cash flow modeling. The focus of this analysis is on assessing the
sufficiency and quality of the underlying collateral and timing of
cash flows based on various scenario tests. This additional
data provides the
13
Impairment Committee with additional context to evaluate current market
conditions to determine if the impairment is temporary in nature.
For securities considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired, the security is adjusted to fair
value and the resulting losses are recognized in Realized investment losses on the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Companys assertion to hold until a recovery in value takes into account a view on the
estimated recovery horizon which in some cases may include maturity. Given the prolonged nature of
the current market downturn, the duration and severity of the unrealized losses has progressed well
beyond historical norms. The Company will continue to monitor these unrealized losses and will
assess all facts and circumstances as they become known which may result in changes to the
conclusions reached based on current facts and circumstances and additional OTTI losses.
14
The following tables provide a summary of fixed maturity and equity securities investments.
Summary of Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Less than |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Fair |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
or Greater |
|
|
Value |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
government agencies |
|
$ |
1,056 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,097 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
9,113 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
7,287 |
|
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions tax-exempt securities |
|
|
9,268 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
8,471 |
|
Corporate and other taxable bonds |
|
|
13,683 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
11,554 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
33,189 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
3,725 |
|
|
|
28,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,972 |
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
1,460 |
|
|
$ |
3,980 |
|
|
$ |
29,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Less than |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Fair |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
or Greater |
|
|
Value |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
government agencies |
|
$ |
2,862 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,930 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
9,670 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
7,764 |
|
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions tax-exempt securities |
|
|
8,557 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
7,415 |
|
Corporate and other taxable bonds |
|
|
12,993 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
10,730 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
34,154 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
2,969 |
|
|
|
28,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities trading |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
35,171 |
|
|
$ |
654 |
|
|
$ |
2,774 |
|
|
$ |
3,293 |
|
|
$ |
29,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
The following table summarizes, for available-for-sale fixed income securities, preferred stocks
and common stocks, the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by length of time those
securities have been continuously in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008.
Unrealized Loss Aging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months |
|
$ |
3,324 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
6,749 |
|
|
$ |
681 |
|
7-11 months |
|
|
5,313 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
6,159 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
12-24 months |
|
|
6,752 |
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
3,549 |
|
|
|
1,803 |
|
Greater than 24 months |
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
17,012 |
|
|
|
4,118 |
|
|
|
18,235 |
|
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
7-11 months |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
12-24 months |
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
Greater than 24 months |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-investment grade |
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities |
|
|
19,381 |
|
|
|
5,162 |
|
|
|
20,552 |
|
|
|
5,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable and non-redeemable preferred stocks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
7-11 months |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
12-24 months |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preferred stocks |
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stocks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
7-11 months |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-24 months |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Greater than 24 months |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stocks |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
19,751 |
|
|
$ |
5,440 |
|
|
$ |
21,148 |
|
|
$ |
6,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2009, the fair value of fixed maturity securities was $28,461 million, representing
80% of the total investment portfolio. The gross unrealized loss for any single issuer, other than
those specific issuers discussed within the tax-exempt securities unrealized loss discussion below,
was less than 0.3% of the carrying value of the total fixed maturity portfolio. The total fixed
maturity portfolio gross unrealized losses included 2,103 securities which were, in aggregate,
approximately 21% below amortized cost.
The gross unrealized losses on equity securities, consisting of common stocks and non-redeemable preferred stocks, were $260 million, including 150 securities which
were, in aggregate, approximately 45% below cost.
The classification between investment grade and non-investment grade is based on a ratings
methodology that takes into account ratings from the three major providers, Standard & Poors (S&P),
Moodys Investor Services, Inc. (Moodys) and Fitch Ratings (Fitch) in that order of preference.
If a security is not rated by any of the three, the Company formulates an internal rating. For
securities with credit support from third party guarantees, the rating reflects the greater of the
underlying rating of the issuer or the insured rating.
Based on current facts and circumstances, the Company has determined that the securities presented
in the above unrealized gain/loss tables were temporarily impaired when evaluated at March 31, 2009
and
16
December 31, 2008, and therefore no related realized losses were recorded. A discussion of some of
the factors reviewed in making that determination as of March 31, 2009 is presented below.
The market disruption that emerged in 2008 generally continued into the first quarter of 2009.
While the government has initiated programs intended to stabilize and improve markets and the
economy, the impact of these programs remains uncertain. Certain sectors of the financial markets
began to show signs of improvement during the first quarter of 2009 while other sectors continued
to lag. As a result, the Company incurred realized losses in its investment portfolio primarily
driven by the continuing credit issues attributable to the asset-backed and financial sectors,
which have adversely impacted its results of operations.
Asset-Backed Securities
The unrealized losses on the Companys investments in asset-backed securities are due to a
combination of factors related to the market disruption caused by credit concerns that began with
the sub-prime issue, but then also extended into other collateral supporting securities in the
Companys portfolio.
The majority of the holdings in this category are collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs),
typically collateralized with prime residential mortgages, and corporate asset-backed structured
securities (ABS). The holdings in these sectors include 471 securities in a gross unrealized loss
position aggregating $1,873 million. The aggregate severity of the unrealized loss was
approximately 25% of amortized cost. The contractual cash flows on the asset-backed structured
securities are passed through, but may be structured into classes of preference. The securities in
this category are modeled in order to evaluate the risks of default on the performance of the
underlying collateral. Within this analysis multiple factors are analyzed including probable risk
of default, loss severity upon a default, payment delinquency, over collateralization and interest
coverage triggers, credit support from lower-rated tranches and rating agency actions amongst
others. Securities are modeled against base-case and reasonable stress scenarios of probable
default activity, given current market conditions, and then analyzed for potential impact to the
Companys particular holdings. The structured securities held are generally secured by over
collateralization or default protection provided by subordinated tranches. For the three months
ended March 31, 2009, OTTI losses of $196 million were recorded on asset-backed securities. These
losses were primarily attributable to adverse changes in the experience of certain underlying
collateral and the resulting future expected default and recovery assumptions in the cash flow
models.
The remainder of the holdings in this category includes mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by an
agency of the U.S. Government. There were 195 agency mortgage-backed pass-through securities and 1
agency CMO in an unrealized loss position aggregating $1 million as of March 31, 2009. The
cumulative unrealized losses on these securities were approximately 1% of amortized cost. These
securities do not tend to be influenced by the credit of the issuer but rather the characteristics
and projected cash flows of the underlying collateral. For the three months ended March 31, 2009,
there were no OTTI losses recorded for mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by an agency of the
U.S. Government.
The following table summarizes asset-backed securities in an unrealized loss position by ratings
distribution at March 31, 2009.
Gross Unrealized Losses by Ratings Distribution
March 31, 2009
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Rating |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
AAA |
|
$ |
5,541 |
|
|
$ |
4,519 |
|
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
AA |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
A |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
BBB |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Non-investment grade |
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,547 |
|
|
$ |
5,673 |
|
|
$ |
1,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
The Company believes the decline in fair value is primarily attributable to broader deteriorating
market conditions, liquidity concerns and wider than historical bid/ask spreads brought about as a
result of portfolio liquidations and is not indicative of the quality of the underlying collateral.
Because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until an anticipated
recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the Company considers these investments to be
temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
States, Municipalities and Political Subdivisions Tax-Exempt Securities
The unrealized losses on the Companys investments in tax-exempt municipal securities are due to
overall market conditions, changes in credit spreads, and to a lesser extent, changes in interest
rates. Market conditions in the tax exempt sector have improved during the first quarter of 2009;
however, yields continue to be higher than expected relative to after tax returns on alternative
classes. The holdings in this category include 676 securities. The aggregate severity of the
total unrealized losses was approximately 14% of amortized cost. The following table summarizes
the ratings distribution of tax-exempt securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2009.
Gross Unrealized Losses by Ratings Distribution
March 31, 2009
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Rating |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
AAA |
|
$ |
1,968 |
|
|
$ |
1,813 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
AA |
|
|
2,494 |
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
A |
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
BBB |
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,482 |
|
|
$ |
5,566 |
|
|
$ |
916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The portfolio consists primarily of special revenue and assessment bonds, representing 79% of the
overall portfolio, followed by general obligation political subdivision bonds at 13%, and state
general obligation bonds at 8%.
The largest exposures at March 31, 2009 as measured by unrealized losses were special revenue bonds
issued by several states backed by tobacco settlement funds with unrealized losses of $332 million
and several separate issues of Puerto Rico Sales Tax revenue bonds with unrealized losses of $104
million. All of these securities are investment grade.
Based on the Companys current evaluation of these securities and its ability and intent to hold
them until an anticipated recovery in value, the Company does not consider these to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009. For the three months ended March 31, 2009,
there were no OTTI losses recorded for tax-exempt municipal securities.
18
Corporate and Other Taxable Bonds
The holdings in this category include 754 securities in a gross unrealized loss position
aggregating $2,351 million. The aggregate severity of the unrealized losses was approximately 24%
of amortized cost.
The following tables summarize corporate and other taxable bonds in an unrealized loss position
across industry sectors and by ratings distribution at March 31, 2009.
Gross Unrealized Losses by Industry Sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Gross |
|
(In millions) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
Communications |
|
$ |
1,498 |
|
|
$ |
1,230 |
|
|
$ |
268 |
|
Consumer, Cyclical |
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
Consumer, Non-cyclical |
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
Energy |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Financial |
|
|
2,345 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
Other |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,821 |
|
|
$ |
7,470 |
|
|
$ |
2,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses by Ratings Distribution
March 31, 2009
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Gross |
|
Rating |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
AAA |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
AA |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
A |
|
|
2,078 |
|
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
BBB |
|
|
4,608 |
|
|
|
3,538 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
Non-investment grade |
|
|
2,804 |
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,821 |
|
|
$ |
7,470 |
|
|
$ |
2,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has invested in securities with characteristics of both debt and equity investments,
often referred to as hybrid debt securities. Such securities are typically debt instruments issued
with long or extendable maturity dates, may provide for the ability to defer interest payments
without defaulting and are usually lower in the capital structure of the issuer than traditional
bonds. The financial industry sector presented above includes hybrid debt securities with an
aggregate fair value of $456 million and an aggregate amortized cost of $928 million.
The decline in fair value was primarily attributable to deterioration and volatility in the broader
credit markets throughout 2008 that resulted in widening of credit spreads over risk free rates
well beyond historical norms and macro conditions in certain sectors that the market viewed as out
of favor. These conditions generally continued into 2009 but have improved slightly from the lows
in 2008. The Company monitors the financial performance of the corporate bond issuers for
potential factors that may cause a change in outlook and addresses securities that are deemed to be
OTTI. Because these declines were not related to any issuer specific credit events, and because
the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until an anticipated recovery of
fair value, which may be maturity, the Company considers these investments to be temporarily
impaired at March 31, 2009. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, OTTI losses of $190 million
were recorded on corporate and other taxable bonds.
19
Preferred Stock
The unrealized losses on the Companys investments in preferred stock were caused by similar
factors as those that affected the Companys corporate bond portfolio. Approximately 83% of the
gross unrealized losses in this category come from securities issued by financial institutions, 11%
from utilities and 6% from entities in the communications sector. The holdings in this category
include 27 securities in a gross unrealized loss position aggregating $274 million, with 93% of
these unrealized losses attributable to non-redeemable preferred stocks. The following table
summarizes preferred stocks by ratings distribution at March 31, 2009.
Gross Unrealized Losses by Ratings Distribution
March 31, 2009
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Gross |
|
Rating |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
A |
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
BBB |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Non-investment grade |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
627 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company believes the holdings in this category have been adversely impacted by significant
credit spread widening brought on by a combination of factors in the capital markets. The majority
of securities in this category are related to the banking and mortgage industries and are
experiencing what the Company believes to be temporarily depressed valuations. The Company
monitors this sector for all relevant news and believes, given current facts and circumstances, the
remaining issuers in this sector with unrealized losses will recover in value. Because the Company
has the ability and intent to hold these investments until an anticipated recovery of fair value,
the Company considers these investments to be temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009. This
evaluation was made on the basis that these securities possess characteristics similar to debt
securities and maintain their ability to pay dividends. For the three months ended March 31, 2009,
there were OTTI losses of $225 million recorded on preferred stock, including $188 million related
to a major U.S. financial institution. The ratings of several preferred stock issues of this
institution were downgraded to below investment grade during the first quarter of 2009.
Investment Commitments
As of March 31, 2009, the Company had committed approximately $277 million to future capital calls
from various third-party limited partnership investments in exchange for an ownership interest in
the related partnerships.
The Company invests in multiple bank loan participations as part of its overall investment strategy
and has committed to additional future purchases and sales. The purchase and sale of these
investments are recorded on the date that the legal agreements are finalized and cash settlement is
made. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had commitments to purchase $2 million and sell $26
million of various bank loan participations. When loan participation purchases are settled and
recorded they may contain both funded and unfunded amounts. An unfunded loan represents an
obligation by the Company to provide additional amounts under the terms of the loan participation.
The funded portions are reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, while any unfunded
amounts are not recorded until a draw is made under the loan facility. As of March 31, 2009, the
Company had obligations on unfunded bank loan participations in the amount of $10 million.
20
Note E. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivatives in the normal course of business, primarily in an attempt to reduce
its exposure to market risk (principally interest rate risk, equity stock price risk and foreign
currency risk) stemming from various assets and liabilities and credit risk (the ability of an
obligor to make timely payment of principal and/or interest). The Companys principal objective
under such risk strategies is to achieve the desired reduction in economic risk, even if the
position does not receive hedge accounting treatment.
The Companys use of derivatives is limited by statutes and regulations promulgated by the various
regulatory bodies to which it is subject, and by its own derivative policy. The derivative policy
limits the authorization to initiate derivative transactions to certain personnel. Derivatives
entered into for hedging, regardless of the choice to designate hedge accounting, shall have a
maturity that effectively correlates to the underlying hedged asset or liability. The policy
prohibits the use of derivatives containing greater than one-to-one leverage with respect to
changes in the underlying price, rate or index. The policy also prohibits the use of borrowed
funds, including funds obtained through securities lending, to engage in derivative transactions.
The Company has exposure to economic losses due to interest rate risk arising from changes in the
level of, or volatility of, interest rates. The Company attempts to mitigate its exposure to
interest rate risk through portfolio management, which includes rebalancing its existing portfolios
of assets and liabilities, as well as changing the characteristics of investments to be purchased
or sold in the future. In addition, various derivative financial instruments are used to modify
the interest rate risk exposures of certain assets and liabilities. These strategies include the
use of interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and floors, options, futures, forwards and
commitments to purchase securities. These instruments are generally used to lock interest rates or
market values, to shorten or lengthen durations of fixed maturity securities or investment
contracts, or to hedge (on an economic basis) interest rate risks associated with investments and
variable rate debt. The Company infrequently designates these types of instruments as hedges
against specific assets or liabilities.
The Company is exposed to equity price risk as a result of its investment in equity securities and
equity derivatives. Equity price risk results from changes in the level or volatility of equity
prices, which affect the value of equity securities, or instruments that derive their value from
such securities. The Company attempts to mitigate its exposure to such risks by limiting its
investment in any one security or index. The Company may also manage this risk by utilizing
instruments such as options, swaps, futures and collars to protect appreciation in securities held.
The Company has exposure to credit risk arising from the uncertainty associated with a financial
instrument obligors ability to make timely principal and/or interest payments. The Company
attempts to mitigate this risk by limiting credit concentrations, practicing diversification, and
frequently monitoring the credit quality of issuers and counterparties. In addition, the Company
may utilize credit derivatives such as credit default swaps (CDS) to modify the credit risk
inherent in certain investments. Credit default swaps involve a transfer of credit risk from one
party to another in exchange for periodic payments. The Company infrequently designates these
types of instruments as hedges against specific assets.
Foreign exchange rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in foreign currency exchange
rates will impact the fair value of financial instruments denominated in a foreign currency. The
Companys foreign transactions are primarily denominated in British pounds, Euros and Canadian
dollars. The Company typically manages this risk via asset/liability currency matching and through
the use of foreign currency forwards. The Company infrequently designates these types of
instruments as hedges against specific assets or liabilities.
In addition to the derivatives used for risk management purposes described above, the Company may
also use derivatives for purposes of income enhancement. Income enhancement transactions are
entered into with the intention of providing additional income or yield to a particular portfolio
segment or instrument. Income enhancement transactions are limited in scope and primarily involve
the sale of covered options in which the Company receives premium in exchange for selling a call or
put option.
The Company will also use CDS to sell credit protection against a specified credit event. In
selling credit protection, CDS are used to replicate fixed income securities when credit exposure
to certain issuers is not available or when it is economically beneficial to transact in the
derivative market compared to the cash market alternative. Credit risk includes both the default
event risk and market value exposure due to fluctuations in credit spreads. In selling CDS
protection, the Company receives a periodic premium in exchange for providing
21
credit protection on a single name reference obligation or a credit derivative index. If there is
an event of default as defined by the CDS agreement, the Company is required to pay the
counterparty the referenced notional amount of the CDS contract and in exchange the Company is
entitled to receive the referenced defaulted security or the cash equivalent.
At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had $116 million and $148 million notional
value of outstanding CDS contracts where the Company sold credit protection. The maximum payment
related to these CDS contracts was $116 million and $148 million assuming there was no residual
value in the defaulted securities that the Company would receive as part of the contract
terminations. The fair value of these contracts at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was a
liability of $47 million and $43 million which represents the amount that the Company would have to
pay at those dates to exit these derivative positions.
The tables below summarize CDS contracts where the Company sold credit protection as of March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008. The largest single reference obligation at these dates represented 24%
and 20% of the total notional value and was rated AAA.
Credit Ratings of
Underlying
Reference
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
Maximum Amount of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Credit Default |
|
|
Future Payments under |
|
|
Average Years |
|
(In millions) |
|
Swaps |
|
|
Credit Default Swaps |
|
|
to Maturity |
|
AAA/AA/A |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
BBB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
B |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
CCC and lower |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Ratings of
Underlying
Reference
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
Maximum Amount of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Credit Default |
|
|
Future Payments under |
|
|
Average Years |
|
(In millions) |
|
Swaps |
|
|
Credit Default Swaps |
|
|
to Maturity |
|
AAA/AA/A |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
BBB |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
B |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
CCC and lower |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit exposure associated with non-performance by the counterparties to derivative instruments is
generally limited to the uncollateralized fair value of the asset related to the instruments
recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company attempts to mitigate the risk
of non-performance by monitoring the creditworthiness of counterparties and diversifying
derivatives to multiple counterparties. The Company generally requires that all over-the-counter
derivative contracts be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA)
Master Agreement, and exchanges collateral under the terms of these agreements with its derivative
investment counterparties depending on the amount of the exposure and the credit rating of the
counterparty. The Company does not offset its net derivative positions against the fair value of
the collateral provided. The fair value of cash collateral provided by the Company was $41 million
and $74 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The Company held no cash collateral as of
March 31, 2009. The fair value of cash collateral received from counterparties was $6 million at
December 31, 2008.
22
See Note F for information regarding the fair value of derivatives securities. The Companys
accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives not held in a trading portfolio is reported
in Realized investment gains (losses) on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
A summary of the recognized gains (losses) related to derivative financial instruments follows.
Recognized Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without hedge designation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
Credit default swaps purchased protection |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
Credit default swaps sold protection |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Futures sold, not yet purchased |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Currency forwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Options written |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
Currency forwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys derivative activities in the trading portfolio were associated with its pension
deposit business, through which the Company was exposed to equity price risk associated with its
indexed group annuity contracts. The derivatives held for trading purposes were carried at fair
value with the related gains and losses included within Net investment income on the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations. A corresponding increase or decrease was reflected in the
Policyholders funds reserves supported by the trading portfolio, which was included in Insurance
claims and policyholders benefits on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. During
2008, the Company exited the indexed group annuity portion of its pension deposit business.
A summary of the aggregate contractual or notional amounts and gross estimated fair values related
to derivative financial instruments reported as Other invested assets or Other liabilities on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets follows. Embedded derivative instruments subject to
bifurcation are reported together with the host contract, at fair value. The contractual or
notional amounts for derivatives are used to calculate the exchange of contractual payments under
the agreements and may not be representative of the potential for gain or loss on these
instruments.
Derivative Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual/ |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Notional |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
(In millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without hedge designation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
Credit default swaps purchased protection |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Credit default swaps sold protection |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
Commitments to purchase government and municipal securities (TBAs) |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity warrants |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,636 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Derivative Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual/ |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Notional |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
(In millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without hedge designation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
Credit default swaps purchased protection |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Credit default swaps sold protection |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
Equity warrants |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,457 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, new derivative transactions entered into totaled
approximately $6.1 billion in notional value while derivative termination activity totaled
approximately $5.9 billion. The activity during the quarter was primarily attributable to interest
rate swaps, interest rate futures and interest rate options.
Note F. Fair Value
Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The
following fair value hierarchy is used in selecting inputs, with the highest priority given to
Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable.
Level 1 Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all
significant inputs are observable in active markets.
Level 3 Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are
not observable.
The Company attempts to establish fair value as an exit price in an orderly transaction consistent
with normal settlement market conventions. The Company is responsible for the valuation process
and seeks to obtain quoted market prices for all securities. When quoted market prices in active
markets are not available, the Company uses a number of methodologies to establish fair value
estimates including: discounted cash flow models, prices from recently executed transactions of
similar securities, or broker/dealer quotes, utilizing market observable information to the extent
possible. In conjunction with modeling activities, the Company may use external data as inputs.
The modeled inputs are consistent with observable market information, when available, or with the
Companys assumptions as to what market participants would use to value the securities. The
Company also uses pricing services as a significant source of data. The Company monitors all the
pricing inputs to determine if the markets from which the data is gathered are active. As further
validation of the Companys valuation process, the Company samples past fair value estimates and
compares the valuations to actual transactions executed in the market on similar dates.
24
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
at fair value |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
25,412 |
|
|
$ |
2,765 |
|
|
$ |
28,461 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
Derivative financial instruments, included in Other invested
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,583 |
|
Life settlement contracts, included in Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
Discontinued operations investments, included in Other
liabilities |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Separate account business |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,511 |
|
|
$ |
26,755 |
|
|
$ |
3,160 |
|
|
$ |
34,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments, included in Other liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(70 |
) |
|
$ |
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(70 |
) |
|
$ |
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
at fair value |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
2,028 |
|
|
$ |
24,367 |
|
|
$ |
2,492 |
|
|
$ |
28,887 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
Derivative financial instruments, included in Other invested
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,534 |
|
Life settlement contracts, included in Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
Discontinued operations investments, included in Other
liabilities |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Separate account business |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,644 |
|
|
$ |
25,434 |
|
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
|
$ |
33,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments, included in Other liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), and presents changes in
unrealized gains or losses recorded in Net income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008 for Level 3 assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized |
|
|
investment gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
investment gains |
|
|
(losses) and net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recorded in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) and net |
|
|
change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
change in |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
appreciation |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appreciation |
|
|
(depreciation) |
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
(depreciation) |
|
|
included in other |
|
|
issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
included in net |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
and |
|
|
Net transfers |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Level 3 |
|
2009 |
|
|
income* |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
into level 3 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009* |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
2,492 |
|
|
$ |
(71 |
) |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
2,765 |
|
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments, net |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
Life settlement contracts |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Discontinued operations investments |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Separate account business |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,797 |
|
|
$ |
(54 |
) |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
3,090 |
|
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized |
|
|
investment gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
investment gains |
|
|
(losses) and net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recorded in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) and net |
|
|
change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
change in |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
appreciation |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appreciation |
|
|
(depreciation) |
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
(depreciation) |
|
|
included in other |
|
|
issuances |
|
|
Net transfers |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
included in net |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
and |
|
|
into (out |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Level 3 |
|
2008 |
|
|
income* |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
of) level 3 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008* |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
2,684 |
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
(215 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
(181 |
) |
|
$ |
2,245 |
|
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Derivative financial instruments, net |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
Short term investments |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
Life settlement contracts |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Discontinued operations investments |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Separate account business |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,154 |
|
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
|
$ |
(216 |
) |
|
$ |
(86 |
) |
|
$ |
(161 |
) |
|
$ |
2,647 |
|
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses shown above are reported in Net income (loss) as
follows: |
|
|
|
Major Category of Assets and Liabilities |
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations Line Items |
|
Fixed maturity securities
|
|
Net investment income and Realized investment gains (losses) |
|
Equity securities
|
|
Realized investment gains (losses) |
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
Net investment income and Realized investment gains (losses) |
|
Life settlement contracts
|
|
Other revenues |
Securities transferred into Level 3 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 relate primarily to
structured securities with underlying auto loan collateral, included within Fixed maturity
securities. These were previously valued using observable prices for similar securities, but due
to decreased market activity, fair value is determined by cash flow models using market observable
and unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs include estimates of future cash flows and the
maturity assumption.
26
Note G. Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
CNAs property and casualty insurance claim and claim adjustment expense reserves represent the
estimated amounts necessary to resolve all outstanding claims, including claims that are incurred
but not reported (IBNR) as of the reporting date. The Companys reserve projections are based
primarily on detailed analysis of the facts in each case, CNAs experience with similar cases and
various historical development patterns. Consideration is given to such historical patterns as
field reserving trends and claims settlement practices, loss payments, pending levels of unpaid
claims and product mix, as well as court decisions, economic conditions and public attitudes. All
of these factors can affect the estimation of claim and claim adjustment expense reserves.
Establishing claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, including claim and claim adjustment
expense reserves for catastrophic events that have occurred, is an estimation process. Many
factors can ultimately affect the final settlement of a claim and, therefore, the necessary
reserve. Changes in the law, results of litigation, medical costs, the cost of repair materials
and labor rates can all affect ultimate claim costs. In addition, time can be a critical part of
reserving determinations since the longer the span between the incidence of a loss and the payment
or settlement of the claim, the more variable the ultimate settlement amount can be. Accordingly,
short-tail claims, such as property damage claims, tend to be more reasonably estimable than
long-tail claims, such as general liability and professional liability claims. Adjustments to
prior year reserve estimates, if necessary, are reflected in the results of operations in the
period that the need for such adjustments is determined.
Catastrophes are an inherent risk of the property and casualty insurance business and have
contributed to material period-to-period fluctuations in the Companys results of operations and/or
equity. The Company reported catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance, of $13 million and $53
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 for events occurring in those periods.
Catastrophe losses in the first quarter of 2009 related primarily to tornadoes, floods and winter
storms. There can be no assurance that CNAs ultimate cost for catastrophes will not exceed
current estimates.
27
The following provides discussion of the Companys Asbestos and Environmental Pollution (A&E)
reserves.
A&E Reserves
CNAs property and casualty insurance subsidiaries have actual and potential exposures related to
A&E claims. The following table provides data related to CNAs A&E claim and claim adjustment
expense reserves.
A&E Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
|
Asbestos |
|
|
Pollution |
|
|
Asbestos |
|
|
Pollution |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross reserves |
|
$ |
2,020 |
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
2,112 |
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
Ceded reserves |
|
|
(869 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves |
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
1,202 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos
There was no asbestos-related net claim and claim adjustment reserve development recorded for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. The Company recorded $2 million of unfavorable asbestos-related
net claim and claim adjustment expense reserve development for the three months ended March 31,
2008. The Company paid asbestos-related claims, net of reinsurance recoveries, of $51 million and
$49 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
The ultimate cost of reported claims, and in particular A&E claims, is subject to a great many
uncertainties, including future developments of various kinds that CNA does not control and that
are difficult or impossible to foresee accurately. With respect to the litigation identified below
in particular, numerous factual and legal issues remain unresolved. Rulings on those issues by the
courts are critical to the evaluation of the ultimate cost to the Company. The outcome of the
litigation cannot be predicted with any reliability. Accordingly, the extent of losses beyond any
amounts that may be accrued are not readily determinable at this time.
Some asbestos-related defendants have asserted that their insurance policies are not subject to
aggregate limits on coverage. CNA has such claims from a number of insureds. Some of these claims
involve insureds facing exhaustion of products liability aggregate limits in their policies, who
have asserted that their asbestos-related claims fall within so-called non-products liability
coverage contained within their policies rather than products liability coverage, and that the
claimed non-products coverage is not subject to any aggregate limit. It is difficult to predict
the ultimate size of any of the claims for coverage purportedly not subject to aggregate limits or
predict to what extent, if any, the attempts to assert non-products claims outside the products
liability aggregate will succeed. CNAs policies also contain other limits applicable to these
claims and the Company has additional coverage defenses to certain claims. CNA has attempted to
manage its asbestos exposure by aggressively seeking to settle claims on acceptable terms. There
can be no assurance that any of these settlement efforts will be successful, or that any such
claims can be settled on terms acceptable to CNA. Where the Company cannot settle a claim on
acceptable terms, CNA aggressively litigates the claim. However, adverse developments with respect
to such matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and/or
equity.
Certain asbestos claim litigation in which CNA is currently engaged is described below:
On February 13, 2003, CNA announced it had resolved asbestos-related coverage litigation and claims
involving A.P. Green Industries, A.P. Green Services and Bigelow-Liptak Corporation. Under the
agreement, CNA is required to pay $70 million, net of reinsurance recoveries, over a ten year
period commencing after the final approval of a bankruptcy plan of reorganization. The settlement
received initial bankruptcy court approval on August 18, 2003. The debtors plan of reorganization
includes an injunction to protect CNA from any future claims. The bankruptcy court issued an
opinion on September 24, 2007 recommending confirmation of that
28
plan. On July 25, 2008, the District Court affirmed the Bankruptcy Courts ruling. Several
insurers have appealed that ruling to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals; that appeal is pending at
this time.
CNA is engaged in insurance coverage litigation in New York State Court, filed in 2003, with a
defendant class of underlying plaintiffs who have asbestos bodily injury claims against the former
Robert A. Keasbey Company (Keasbey) (Continental Casualty Co. v. Employers Ins. of Wausau et al.,
No. 601037/03 (N.Y. County)). Keasbey, a currently dissolved corporation, was a seller and
installer of asbestos-containing insulation products in New York and New Jersey. Thousands of
plaintiffs have filed bodily injury claims against Keasbey. However, under New York court rules,
asbestos claims are not cognizable unless they meet certain minimum medical impairment standards.
Since 2002, when these court rules were adopted, only a small portion of such claims have met
medical impairment criteria under New York court rules and as to the remaining claims, Keasbeys
involvement at a number of work sites is a highly contested issue.
CNA issued Keasbey primary policies for 1970-1987 and excess policies for 1971-1978. CNA has paid
an amount substantially equal to the policies aggregate limits for products and completed
operations claims in the confirmed CNA policies. Claimants against Keasbey allege, among other
things, that CNA owes coverage under sections of the policies not subject to the aggregate limits,
an allegation CNA vigorously contests in the lawsuit. In the litigation, CNA and the claimants
seek declaratory relief as to the interpretation of various policy provisions.
On December 30, 2008, a New York appellate court entered a unanimous decision in favor of CNA on
multiple alternative grounds including findings that claims arising out of Keasbeys asbestos
insulating activities are included within the products hazard/completed operations coverage, which
has been exhausted; and that the defendant claimant class is subject to the affirmative defenses
that CNA may have had against Keasbey, barring all coverage claims. The parties have the right to
seek further appellate review of the decision.
CNA has insurance coverage disputes related to asbestos bodily injury claims against a bankrupt
insured, Burns & Roe Enterprises, Inc. (Burns & Roe). These disputes are currently part of
coverage litigation (stayed in view of the bankruptcy) and an adversary proceeding in In re:
Burns & Roe Enterprises, Inc., pending in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New
Jersey, No. 00-41610. Burns & Roe provided engineering and related services in connection with
construction projects. At the time of its bankruptcy filing, on December 4, 2000, Burns & Roe
asserted that it faced approximately 11,000 claims alleging bodily injury resulting from exposure
to asbestos as a result of construction projects in which Burns & Roe was involved. CNA allegedly
provided primary liability coverage to Burns & Roe from 1956-1969 and 1971-1974, along with certain
project-specific policies from 1964-1970. In September of 2007, CNA entered into an agreement with
Burns & Roe, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed by the Bankruptcy Court and
the Future Claims Representative (the Addendum), which provides that claims allegedly covered by
CNA policies will be adjudicated in the tort system, with any coverage disputes related to those
claims to be decided in coverage litigation. With the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, Burns &
Roe included the Addendum as part of its Fourth Amended Plan (the Plan), which was confirmed on
February 23, 2009. On March 5, 2009, Firemans Fund Insurance Co. filed a motion to clarify and
modify the confirmation order. It is not possible to predict with any reliability when the Fourth
Amended Plan will become effective or when the Trust created under the Fourth Amended Plan will
begin processing asbestos claims. With respect to both confirmation of the Plan and coverage
issues, numerous factual and legal issues remain to be resolved that are critical to the final
result, the outcome of which cannot be predicted with any reliability. These factors include,
among others: (a) whether the Company has any further responsibility to compensate claimants
against Burns & Roe under its policies and, if so, under which; (b) whether the Companys
responsibilities under its policies extend to a particular claimants entire claim or only to a
limited percentage of the claim; (c) whether the Companys responsibilities under its policies are
limited by the occurrence limits or other provisions of the policies; (d) whether certain
exclusions, including professional liability exclusions, in some of the Companys policies apply to
exclude certain claims; (e) the extent to which claimants can establish exposure to asbestos
materials as to which Burns & Roe has any responsibility; (f) the legal theories which must be
pursued by such claimants to establish the liability of Burns & Roe and whether such theories can,
in fact, be established; (g) the diseases and damages alleged by such claimants; (h) the extent
that any liability of Burns & Roe would be shared with other potentially responsible parties; (i)
whether any party will appeal the confirmation of the Plan, which includes the Addendum, and if so
whether confirmation will be affirmed; and (j) the impact of bankruptcy proceedings on claims and
coverage
29
issue resolution. Accordingly, the extent of losses beyond any amounts that may be accrued are not
readily determinable at this time.
Suits have also been initiated directly against the CNA companies and numerous other insurers in
two jurisdictions: Texas and Montana. Approximately 80 lawsuits were filed in Texas beginning in
2002, against two CNA companies and numerous other insurers and non-insurer corporate defendants
asserting liability for failing to warn of the dangers of asbestos (e.g. Boson v. Union Carbide
Corp., (Nueces County, Texas)). During 2003, several of the Texas suits were dismissed and
while certain of the Texas courts rulings were appealed, plaintiffs later dismissed their appeals.
A different Texas court, however, denied similar motions seeking dismissal. After that court
denied a related challenge to jurisdiction, the insurers transferred the case, among others, to a
state multi-district litigation court in Harris County charged with handling asbestos cases. In
February 2006, the insurers petitioned the appellate court in Houston for an order of mandamus,
requiring the multi-district litigation court to dismiss the case on jurisdictional and substantive
grounds. On February 29, 2008, the appellate court denied the insurers mandamus petition on
procedural grounds, but did not reach a decision on the merits of the petition. Instead, the
appellate court allowed to stand the multi-district litigation courts determination that the case
remained on its inactive docket and that no further action can be taken unless qualifying reports
are filed or the filing of such reports is waived. With respect to the cases that are still
pending in Texas, in June 2008, plaintiffs in the only active case dropped the remaining CNA
company from that suit, leaving only inactive cases against CNA companies. In those inactive
cases, numerous factual and legal issues remain to be resolved that are critical to the final
result, the outcome of which cannot be predicted with any reliability. These factors include: (a)
the speculative nature and unclear scope of any alleged duties owed to individuals exposed to
asbestos and the resulting uncertainty as to the potential pool of potential claimants; (b) the
fact that imposing such duties on all insurer and non-insurer corporate defendants would be
unprecedented and, therefore, the legal boundaries of recovery are difficult to estimate; (c) the
fact that many of the claims brought to date are barred by the Statute of Limitations and it is
unclear whether future claims would also be barred; (d) the unclear nature of the required nexus
between the acts of the defendants and the right of any particular claimant to recovery; and (e)
the existence of hundreds of co-defendants in some of the suits and the applicability of the legal
theories pled by the claimants to thousands of potential defendants. Accordingly, the extent of
losses beyond any amounts that may be accrued is not readily determinable at this time.
On March 22, 2002, a direct action was filed in Montana (Pennock, et al. v. Maryland Casualty,
et al. First Judicial District Court of Lewis & Clark County, Montana) by eight individual
plaintiffs (all employees of W.R. Grace & Co. (W.R. Grace)) and their spouses against CNA, Maryland
Casualty and the State of Montana. This action alleges that the carriers failed to warn of or
otherwise protect W.R. Grace employees from the dangers of asbestos at a W.R. Grace vermiculite
mining facility in Libby, Montana. The Montana direct action is currently stayed because of W.R.
Graces pending bankruptcy. On April 7, 2008, W.R. Grace announced a settlement in principle with
the asbestos personal injury claimants committee subject to confirmation of a plan of
reorganization by the bankruptcy court. The confirmation hearing is currently scheduled to begin
in June 2009. The settlement in principle with the asbestos claimants has no present impact on the
stay currently imposed on the Montana direct action and with respect to such claims, numerous
factual and legal issues remain to be resolved that are critical to the final result, the outcome
of which cannot be predicted with any reliability. These factors include: (a) the unclear nature
and scope of any alleged duties owed to people exposed to asbestos and the resulting uncertainty as
to the potential pool of potential claimants; (b) the potential application of Statutes of
Limitation to many of the claims which may be made depending on the nature and scope of the alleged
duties; (c) the unclear nature of the required nexus between the acts of the defendants and the
right of any particular claimant to recovery; (d) the diseases and damages claimed by such
claimants; (e) the extent that such liability would be shared with other potentially responsible
parties; and (f) the impact of bankruptcy proceedings on claims resolution. Accordingly, the extent
of losses beyond any amounts that may be accrued are not readily determinable at this time.
CNA is vigorously defending these and other cases and believes that it has meritorious defenses to
the claims asserted. However, there are numerous factual and legal issues to be resolved in
connection with these claims, and it is extremely difficult to predict the outcome or ultimate
financial exposure represented by these matters. Adverse developments with respect to any of these
matters could have a material adverse effect on CNAs business, insurer financial strength and debt
ratings, results of operations and/or equity.
30
Environmental Pollution
There was no environmental pollution net claim and claim adjustment reserve development recorded
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 or 2008. The Company paid environmental
pollution-related claims, net of reinsurance recoveries, of $14 million and $19 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Net Prior Year Development
The net prior year development presented below includes premium development due to its direct
relationship to claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development. The net prior
year development presented below includes the impact of commutations, but excludes the impact of
increases or decreases in the allowance for uncollectible reinsurance.
Net Prior Year Development
Three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard |
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Lines |
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Core |
|
|
Total |
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and
allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core (Non-A&E) |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(70 |
) |
A&E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development
before impact of premium development |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Prior Year Development
Three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard |
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Lines |
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Core |
|
|
Total |
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year
claim and allocated claim adjustment expense
reserve development: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core (Non-A&E) |
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
A&E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year
development before impact of premium development |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior
year development |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
2009 Net Prior Year Development
Standard Lines
The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to
experience in property coverages, including $31 million resulting from favorable frequency and
severity on claims relating to catastrophes in accident year 2008.
Specialty Lines
The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to
experience in liability coverages. This favorable development was the result of decreased
frequency of large claims in accident years 2007 and prior.
An additional $7 million of favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve
development was a result of favorable outcomes on claims relating to catastrophes in accident years
2005 and 2008.
2008 Net Prior Year Development
Standard Lines
Approximately $20 million of favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve
development was recorded in property coverages. This favorable development was due to lower than
expected frequency in accident year 2007 and favorable outcomes on several individual claims in
accident years 2006 and prior.
Approximately $23 million of favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve
development was recorded in general liability due to favorable outcomes on individual claims
causing lower severity in accident years 2003 and prior.
Approximately $24 million of unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve
development was recorded in excess workers compensation due to higher than expected frequency and
severity in accident years 2003 and prior. This is a result of continued claim cost inflation in
older accident years, driven by increasing medical inflation and advances in medical care.
Specialty Lines
Approximately $10 million of favorable premium development was recorded due to a change in ultimate
premiums within a foreign affiliates property and financial lines. This was offset by
approximately $9 million of related unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense
reserve development.
Note H. Legal Proceedings and Contingent Liabilities
Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation
On August 1, 2005, CNAF and several of its insurance subsidiaries were joined as defendants, along
with other insurers and brokers, in multidistrict litigation pending in the United States District
Court for the District of New Jersey, In re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation, Civil
No. 04-5184 (FSH). The plaintiffs allege bid rigging and improprieties in the payment of
contingent commissions in connection with the sale of insurance that violated federal and state
antitrust laws, the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act and state
common law. After discovery, the District Court dismissed the federal antitrust claims and the
RICO claims, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. The
plaintiffs have appealed the dismissal of their complaint to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
The parties have filed their briefs on the appeal. Oral argument was held on April 21, 2009, and
the Court took the matter under advisement. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to
this action and intends to defend the case vigorously.
32
The extent of losses beyond any amounts that may be accrued are not readily determinable at this
time. However, based on facts and circumstances presently known, in the opinion of management, an
unfavorable outcome will not materially affect the equity of the Company, although results of
operations may be adversely affected.
Global Crossing Limited Litigation
CCC has been named as a defendant in an action brought by the bankruptcy estate of Global Crossing
Limited (Global Crossing) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New
York, Global Crossing Estate Representative, for itself and as the Liquidating Trustee of the
Global Crossing Liquidating Trust v. Gary Winnick, et al., Case No. 04 Civ. 2558 (GEL). In the
complaint, plaintiff seeks damages from CCC and the other defendants for alleged fraudulent
transfers and alleged breaches of fiduciary duties arising from actions taken by Global Crossing
while CCC was a shareholder of Global Crossing. The parties have executed a settlement agreement
which provides for a dismissal with prejudice of all claims against CCC. The settlement is subject
to entry by the Court of an order barring all claims against CCC under certain conditions and
subject to certain limitations. The settlement approximates the amount accrued at March 31, 2009.
California Long Term Care Litigation
Shaffer v. Continental Casualty Company, et al., U.S. District Court, Central District of
California, CV06-2235 RGK, is a class action on behalf of certain California individual long term
health care policyholders, alleging that CCC and CNAF knowingly or negligently used unrealistic
actuarial assumptions in pricing these policies. On January 8, 2008, CCC, CNAF and the plaintiffs
entered into a binding agreement settling the case on a nationwide basis for the policy forms
potentially affected by the allegations of the complaint. Following a fairness hearing, the Court
entered an order approving the settlement. This order was appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals. The appeal has been fully briefed. No oral argument has yet been scheduled. The Company
believes it has meritorious defenses to this appeal and intends to defend the appeal vigorously.
The agreement did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations, however it
still remains subject to the favorable resolution of the appeal.
Asbestos and Environmental Pollution (A&E) Reserves
The Company is also a party to litigation and claims related to A&E cases arising in the ordinary
course of business. See Note G for further discussion.
Other Litigation
The Company is also a party to other litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Based
on the facts and circumstances currently known, such other litigation will not, in the opinion of
management, materially affect the equity or results of operations of the Company.
33
Note I. Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic benefit plan cost (benefit) are presented in the following table.
Net Periodic Cost (Benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Pension cost (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
Actuarial loss amortization |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost (benefit) |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Prior service cost amortization |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Note J. Commitments, Contingencies, and Guarantees
Commitments and Contingencies
The Company holds an investment in a real estate joint venture. In the normal course of business,
CNA, on a joint and several basis with other unrelated insurance company shareholders, has
committed to continue funding the operating deficits of this joint venture. Additionally, CNA and
the other unrelated shareholders, on a joint and several basis, have guaranteed an operating lease
for an office building, which expires in 2016. The guarantee of the operating lease is a parallel
guarantee to the commitment to fund operating deficits; consequently, the separate guarantee to the
lessor is not expected to be triggered as long as the joint venture continues to be funded by its
shareholders and continues to make its annual lease payments.
In the event that the other parties to the joint venture are unable to meet their commitments in
funding the operations of this joint venture, the Company would be required to assume the
obligation for the entire office building operating lease. The Company does not believe it is
likely that it will be required to do so. However, the maximum potential future lease payments at
March 31, 2009 that the Company could be required to pay under this guarantee are approximately
$126 million. If CNA were required to assume the entire lease obligation, the Company would have
the right to pursue reimbursement from the other shareholders and the right to all sublease
revenues.
In the normal course of business, CNA has provided letters of credit in favor of various
unaffiliated insurance companies, regulatory authorities and other entities. At March 31, 2009,
there were approximately $5 million of outstanding letters of credit.
The Company has entered into a limited number of guaranteed payment contracts, primarily relating
to software and telecommunication services, amounting to approximately $18 million at March 31,
2009. Estimated future minimum payments under these contracts are $12 million in 2009, $3 million
in 2010 and $3 million in 2011.
Guarantees
In the course of selling business entities and assets to third parties, the Company has agreed to
indemnify purchasers for losses arising out of breaches of representation and warranties with
respect to the business entities or assets being sold, including, in certain cases, losses arising
from undisclosed liabilities or certain named litigation. Such indemnification provisions
generally survive for periods ranging from nine months following the applicable closing date to the
expiration of the relevant statutes of limitation. As of March 31, 2009, the aggregate amount of
quantifiable indemnification agreements in effect for sales of business entities, assets and third
party loans was $873 million.
In addition, the Company has agreed to provide indemnification to third party purchasers for
certain losses associated with sold business entities or assets that are not limited by a
contractual monetary amount. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding unlimited
indemnifications in connection with the sales of certain of its business entities or assets that
included tax liabilities arising prior to a purchasers ownership of an entity or asset, defects in
title at the time of sale, employee claims arising prior to closing and in some cases losses
arising from certain litigation and undisclosed liabilities. These indemnification agreements
survive until the applicable statutes of limitation expire, or until the agreed upon contract terms
expire.
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company has recorded liabilities of approximately
$17 million and $22 million related to indemnification agreements and management believes that it
is not likely that any future indemnity claims will be significantly greater than the amounts
recorded.
CNAF has also guaranteed certain collateral obligations of a large national contractors letters of
credit. As of March 31, 2009, these guarantees aggregated $4 million. Payment under these
guarantees is reasonably possible based on various factors, including the underlying credit
worthiness of the contractor. In connection with the issuance of preferred securities by CNA Surety Capital Trust I (Issuer
Trust), CNA Surety has also guaranteed the dividend payments and redemption of the preferred
securities issued by the
35
Issuer Trust. The maximum amount of undiscounted future payments the Company could make under the
guarantee is approximately $66 million, consisting of annual dividend payments of approximately
$1.4 million through April 2034 and the redemption value of $30 million. Because payment under the
guarantee would only be required if the Company does not fulfill its obligations under the
debentures held by the Issuer Trust, the Company has not recorded any additional liabilities
related to this guarantee. There has been no change in the underlying assets of the trust and the
Company does not believe that a payment is likely under this guarantee.
Note K. Business Segments
CNAs core property and casualty commercial insurance operations are reported in two business
segments: Standard Lines and Specialty Lines. CNAs non-core operations are managed in two
segments: Life & Group Non-Core and Corporate & Other Non-Core.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note A of the
Consolidated Financial Statements within CNAs Form 10-K. The Company manages most of its assets
on a legal entity basis, while segment operations are conducted across legal entities. As such,
only insurance and reinsurance receivables, insurance reserves and deferred acquisition costs are
readily identifiable by individual segment. Distinct investment portfolios are not maintained for
each segment; accordingly, allocation of assets to each segment is not performed. Therefore, net
investment income and realized investment gains or losses are allocated primarily based on each
segments net carried insurance reserves, as adjusted. All significant intrasegment income and
expense has been eliminated. Income taxes have been allocated on the basis of the taxable income
of the segments.
In the following tables, certain financial measures are presented to provide information used by
management to monitor the Companys operating performance. Management utilizes these financial
measures to monitor the Companys insurance operations and investment portfolio. Net operating
income, which is derived from certain income statement amounts, is used by management to monitor
performance of the Companys insurance operations. The Companys investment portfolio is monitored
through analysis of various quantitative and qualitative factors and certain decisions related to
the sale or impairment of investments that produce realized gains and losses.
Net operating income (loss) is calculated by excluding from net income (loss) attributable to CNAF
the after-tax effects of 1) net realized investment gains or losses, 2) income or loss from
discontinued operations and 3) any cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles. In the
calculation of net operating income, management excludes net realized investment gains or losses
because net realized investment gains or losses related to the Companys investment portfolio are
largely discretionary, except for losses related to other-than-temporary impairments, are generally
driven by economic factors that are not necessarily consistent with key drivers of underwriting
performance, and are therefore not an indication of trends in insurance operations.
The Companys investment portfolio is monitored by management through analyses of various factors
including unrealized gains and losses on securities, portfolio duration and exposure to interest
rate, market and credit risk. Based on such analyses, the Company may impair an investment
security in accordance with its policy, or sell a security. Such activities will produce realized
gains and losses.
The significant components of the Companys continuing operations and selected balance sheet items
are presented in the following tables.
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Standard |
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
Life & Group |
|
|
& Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Lines |
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Non-Core |
|
|
Non-Core |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums |
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
$ |
812 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims, benefits and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net incurred claims and benefits |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
Policyholders dividends |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
Other insurance related expenses |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
181 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total claims, benefits and expenses |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations before
income tax |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit on operating income (loss) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
Net operating income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss) from continuing operations
attributable to CNAF |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment losses, net of participating
policyholders interests |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(532 |
) |
Income tax benefit on realized investment losses |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
Realized investment losses, after-tax, attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses attributable to CNAF |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to
CNAF |
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
(146 |
) |
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance receivables |
|
$ |
2,199 |
|
|
$ |
1,455 |
|
|
$ |
1,876 |
|
|
$ |
2,015 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,545 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
$ |
1,269 |
|
|
$ |
755 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,031 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
$ |
466 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
Insurance reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claim and claim adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
11,893 |
|
|
$ |
8,290 |
|
|
$ |
2,857 |
|
|
$ |
4,203 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,243 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3,461 |
|
Future policy benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,634 |
|
Policyholders funds |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253 |
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Standard |
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
Life & Group |
|
|
& Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Lines |
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Non-Core |
|
|
Non-Core |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums |
|
$ |
783 |
|
|
$ |
873 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
1,813 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims, benefits and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net incurred claims and benefits |
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
Policyholders dividends |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
|
Other insurance related expenses |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
161 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total claims, benefits and expenses |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations before
income tax |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit on operating income (loss) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
Net operating income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss) from continuing operations
attributable to CNAF |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment losses, net of participating
policyholders interests |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
Income tax benefit on realized investment losses |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Realized investment (gains) losses, after-tax, attributable
to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses attributable to CNAF |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to
CNAF |
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance receivables |
|
$ |
2,266 |
|
|
$ |
1,496 |
|
|
$ |
1,907 |
|
|
$ |
2,092 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,761 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
$ |
1,264 |
|
|
$ |
765 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,039 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
472 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
Insurance reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claim and claim adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
12,048 |
|
|
$ |
8,282 |
|
|
$ |
2,862 |
|
|
$ |
4,401 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,593 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
1,848 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,406 |
|
Future policy benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,529 |
|
Policyholders funds |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243 |
|
38
The following table provides revenue by line of business for each reportable segment. Revenues are
comprised of operating revenues and realized investment gains and losses, net of participating
policyholders interests.
Revenue by Line of Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Standard Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Insurance |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
Commercial Insurance |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Lines revenues |
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Specialty Lines |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
Surety |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Warranty |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
CNA Global |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Lines revenues |
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life & Group Non-Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life & Annuity |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Health |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life & Group Non-Core revenues |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & Other Non-Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNA Re |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
Other |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & Other Non-Core revenues |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
1,638 |
|
|
$ |
2,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Note L. Discontinued Operations
CNA has discontinued operations, which consist of run-off insurance and reinsurance operations
acquired in its merger with The Continental Corporation in 1995. The remaining run-off business is
administered by Continental Reinsurance Corporation International, Ltd., a wholly-owned Bermuda
subsidiary. The business consists of facultative property and casualty, treaty excess casualty and
treaty pro-rata reinsurance with underlying exposure to a diverse, multi-line domestic and
international book of business encompassing property, casualty and marine liabilities.
Results of the discontinued operations were as follows.
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Realized investment gains (losses) and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Insurance related expenses |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liabilities of discontinued operations, included in Other liabilities on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets, were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations (In millions) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
Reinsurance receivables |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance reserves |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNAs accounting and reporting for discontinued operations is in accordance with APB Opinion No.
30, Reporting the Results of Operations Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a
Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. At
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the insurance reserves are net of discount of $74 million and
$75 million. The net income (loss) from discontinued operations reported above primarily
represents the net investment income, realized investment gains and losses, foreign currency
transaction gains and losses, effects of the accretion of the loss reserve discount and
re-estimation of the ultimate claim and claim adjustment expense of the discontinued operations.
40
CNA Financial Corporation
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
The following discussion highlights significant factors impacting the consolidated operations and
financial condition of CNA Financial Corporation (CNAF) and its subsidiaries (collectively CNA or
the Company). References to CNA, the Company, we, our, us or like terms refer to the
business of CNA and its subsidiaries. Based on 2007 statutory net written premiums, we are the
seventh largest commercial insurance writer and the thirteenth largest property and casualty
insurance organization in the United States of America. References to net operating income (loss),
net realized investment gains (losses) and net income (loss) used in this MD&A reflect amounts
attributable to CNAF, unless otherwise noted.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q and Item 1A Risk Factors and Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are included in our
Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the year ended December 31,
2008.
Changes in estimates of claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves and premium accruals,
net of reinsurance, for prior years are defined as net prior year development within this MD&A.
These changes can be favorable or unfavorable. Net prior year development does not include the
impact of related acquisition expenses. Further information on our reserves is provided in Note G
of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1.
41
CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Results of Operations
The following table includes our consolidated results of operations. For more detailed components
of our business operations and the net operating income financial measure, see the segment
discussions within this MD&A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums |
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
|
$ |
1,813 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims, benefits and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net incurred claims and benefits |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
Policyholders dividends |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
Other insurance related expenses |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total claims, benefits and expenses |
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
Income tax expense on operating income |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
Net operating income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income from continuing operations attributable to CNAF |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment losses, net of participating policyholders interests |
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
Income tax benefit on realized investment losses |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Realized investment losses, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses attributable to CNAF |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNAF |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to CNAF, net of income
tax (expense) benefit of $0 and $0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to CNAF |
|
$ |
(195 |
) |
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net results decreased $382 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the
same period in 2008. This decrease was due to higher net realized investment losses and decreased
net operating income driven by lower net investment income.
Net realized investment losses increased $311 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as
compared with the same period in 2008. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further
discussion of net realized investment results.
Net operating income decreased $72 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared
with the same period in 2008. Net operating results for Standard and Specialty Lines decreased $39
million, while our Non-Core operations decreased $33 million. These decreases were primarily due
to lower net investment income. Excluding trading portfolio losses of $77 million in 2008, net
investment income declined $91 million. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further
discussion of net investment income, including the impact of a trading portfolio loss of $77
million in 2008. Standard Lines and Specialty Lines current period underwriting results reflected
lower losses and higher expenses as compared to the prior period.
Results for the three months ended March 31, 2009 included expense of $12 million related to our
pension and postretirement plans, compared with a benefit of $3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008. Based on our current assumptions and pension trust investment performance in 2008,
our estimated expense for
42
pension and postretirement plans is approximately $50 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
as compared with a benefit of $14 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Favorable net prior year development of $56 million was recorded for the three months ended March
31, 2009 related to our Standard Lines, Specialty Lines and Corporate & Other Non-core segments.
This amount reflected $70 million of favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve
development and $14 million of unfavorable premium development. Favorable net prior year
development of $24 million was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2008 related to our
Standard Lines, Specialty Lines and Corporate & Other Non-core segments. This amount reflected $13
million of favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development and $11
million of favorable premium development. Further information on net prior year development for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is included in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included under Item 1.
Net earned premiums decreased $141 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared
with the same period in 2008, including a $73 million decrease related to Standard Lines and a $61
million decrease related to Specialty Lines. See the Segment Results section of this MD&A for
further discussion.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses reported during the period. Actual results may
differ from those estimates.
Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in
accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis. We continually evaluate the accounting
policies and estimates used to prepare the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In
general, our estimates are based on historical experience, evaluation of current trends,
information from third party professionals and various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the known facts and circumstances.
The accounting estimates below are considered by us to be critical to an understanding of our
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as their application places the most significant
demands on our judgment.
|
|
Valuation of Investments and Impairment of Securities |
|
|
Long Term Care Products |
|
|
Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations |
Due to the inherent uncertainties involved with these types of judgments, actual results could
differ significantly from estimates and may have a material adverse impact on our results of
operations or equity. See the Critical Accounting Estimates section of our Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included under Item 7 of our Form
10-K for further information.
SEGMENT RESULTS
The following discusses the results of continuing operations for our operating segments. We
utilize the net operating income financial measure to monitor our operations. Net operating income
is calculated by excluding from net income (loss) attributable to CNAF the after-tax effects of 1)
net realized investment gains or losses, 2) income or loss from discontinued operations and 3) any
cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles. See further discussion regarding how we
manage our business in Note K of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under
Item 1. In evaluating the results of our Standard Lines and Specialty Lines
43
segments, we utilize
the loss ratio, the expense ratio, the dividend ratio, and the combined ratio. These ratios
are calculated using GAAP financial results. The loss ratio is the percentage of net incurred
claim and claim adjustment expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio is the percentage of
insurance underwriting and acquisition expenses, including the amortization of deferred acquisition
costs, to net earned premiums. The dividend ratio is the ratio of policyholders dividends
incurred to net earned premiums. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss, expense and dividend
ratios.
STANDARD LINES
The following table details the results of operations for Standard Lines.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net written premiums |
|
$ |
763 |
|
|
$ |
771 |
|
Net earned premiums |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Net operating income |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Net realized investment losses, after-tax |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to CNAF |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense |
|
|
71.8 |
% |
|
|
73.7 |
% |
Expense |
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
Dividend |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
106.3 |
% |
|
|
104.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net written premiums for Standard Lines decreased $8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009 as compared with the same period in 2008. Despite higher retention and new business in the
current year period, premiums written were unfavorably impacted by lower premium rates and general
economic conditions resulting in decreased production, as compared with the first quarter of 2008,
across both our Business and Commercial Insurance groups. The current economic conditions have led
to decreased industry insured exposures, particularly in the construction industry with smaller
payrolls and reduced sales levels. This, along with the competitive market conditions, may
continue to put ongoing pressure on premium and income levels, and the expense ratio. Net earned
premiums decreased $73 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the same
period in 2008, consistent with the trend of lower net written premiums in 2008 as compared to
2007.
Standard Lines averaged rate decreases of 2% for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as compared
to decreases of 6% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 for the contracts that renewed during
those periods. Retention rates of 83% and 81% were achieved for those contracts that were
available for renewal in each period.
Net results decreased $140 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the
same period in 2008. This decrease was due to higher net realized investment losses and decreased
net operating income. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of the net
realized investment results and net investment income.
Net operating income decreased $34 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared
with the same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily due to lower net investment income and
decreased underwriting results.
The combined ratio increased 1.9 points for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with
the same period in 2008. The expense ratio increased 3.8 points for the three months ended March
31, 2009 as compared with the same period in 2008, primarily related to increased underwriting
expenses and a lower net earned premium base. Underwriting expenses increased due to higher
employee-related costs, including increased pension expense.
44
The loss ratio improved 1.9 points primarily due to decreased catastrophe losses. Catastrophe
losses were $12 million, or 1.7 points of the loss ratio, in the first quarter of 2009 as compared
to $53 million, or 6.8 points of the loss ratio, in the first quarter of 2008. This favorability
was partially offset by an increase in the current accident year loss ratio driven by a number of
large property losses in the three months ended March 31, 2009, and the impact of decreased
favorable net prior year development.
Favorable net prior year development of $13 million was recorded for the three months ended March
31, 2009, reflecting $30 million of favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve
development and $17 million of unfavorable premium development. Favorable net prior year
development of $26 million, reflecting $35 million of favorable claim and allocated claim
adjustment expense reserve development and $9 million of unfavorable premium development, was
recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Further information on Standard Lines net
prior year development for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is included in Note G of
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1.
The following table summarizes the gross and net carried reserves as of March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008 for Standard Lines.
Gross and Net Carried
Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Gross Case Reserves |
|
$ |
6,090 |
|
|
$ |
6,158 |
|
Gross IBNR Reserves |
|
|
5,803 |
|
|
|
5,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves |
|
$ |
11,893 |
|
|
$ |
12,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Case Reserves |
|
$ |
4,886 |
|
|
$ |
4,995 |
|
Net IBNR Reserves |
|
|
4,885 |
|
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves |
|
$ |
9,771 |
|
|
$ |
9,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
SPECIALTY LINES
The following table details the results of operations for Specialty Lines.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net written premiums |
|
$ |
829 |
|
|
$ |
848 |
|
Net earned premiums |
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Net operating income |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Net realized investment losses, after-tax |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Net income attributable to CNAF |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense |
|
|
61.4 |
% |
|
|
64.8 |
% |
Expense |
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
Dividend |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
91.0 |
% |
|
|
92.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net written premiums for Specialty Lines decreased $19 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009 as compared with the same period in 2008. After adjusting for foreign exchange, net written
premiums increased modestly, primarily due to increased production in CNA Global. Despite
higher retention and new business in the current year period, premiums written were unfavorably
impacted by foreign exchange and lower premium rates as compared with the first quarter of 2008.
The current economic conditions have led to decreased industry insured exposures, particularly in
the surety bond, architects, engineers and realtors professional liability marketplace. This,
along with the competitive market conditions, may continue to put ongoing pressure on premium and
income levels, and the expense ratio. Net earned premiums decreased $61 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the same period in 2008, consistent with the trend of
lower net written premiums in 2008 as compared to 2007.
Specialty Lines averaged rate decreases of 2% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared
to decreases of 3% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 for the contracts that renewed during
those periods. Retention rates of 86% and 84% were achieved for those contracts that were
available for renewal in each period.
Net income decreased $74 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the
same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily due to higher net realized investment losses.
See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of the net realized investment
results and net investment income.
Net operating income decreased $5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared
with the same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily due to lower net investment income,
partially offset by improved underwriting results.
The combined ratio improved 1.4 points for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with
the same period in 2008. The loss ratio improved 3.4 points, primarily due to increased favorable
net prior year development for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the same
period in 2008. This was partially offset by higher current accident year loss ratios recorded in
several lines of business.
The expense ratio increased 2.4 points for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with
the same period in 2008. The increase primarily related to increased underwriting expenses and the
lower net earned premium base. Underwriting expenses increased due to higher employee-related
costs, including increased pension expense.
Favorable net prior year development of $43 million, reflecting $41 million of favorable claim and
allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development and $2 million of favorable premium
development, was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Favorable net prior year
development of $2 million,
reflecting $17 million of unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve
development and $19 million of favorable premium development, was recorded for the three months
ended March 31, 2008.
46
Further information on Specialty Lines net prior year development for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is included in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included under Item 1.
The following table summarizes the gross and net carried reserves as of March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008 for Specialty Lines.
Gross and Net Carried
Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Gross Case Reserves |
|
$ |
2,621 |
|
|
$ |
2,719 |
|
Gross IBNR Reserves |
|
|
5,669 |
|
|
|
5,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves |
|
$ |
8,290 |
|
|
$ |
8,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Case Reserves |
|
$ |
2,095 |
|
|
$ |
2,149 |
|
Net IBNR Reserves |
|
|
4,775 |
|
|
|
4,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves |
|
$ |
6,870 |
|
|
$ |
6,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE & GROUP NON-CORE
The following table summarizes the results of operations for Life & Group Non-Core.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net earned premiums |
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Net operating loss |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Net realized investment losses, after-tax |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Net loss attributable to CNAF |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Net earned premiums for Life & Group Non-Core decreased $7 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009 as compared with the same period in 2008. Net earned premiums relate primarily to the
group and individual long term care businesses.
Net loss increased $132 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the same
period in 2008. The increase in net loss was primarily due to increased net realized investment
losses and adverse performance on our remaining pension deposit business. Certain of the separate
account investment contracts related to our pension deposit business guarantee principal and a
minimum rate of interest, for which we recorded an additional pretax liability of $13 million in
Policyholders funds during the first quarter of 2009. Additionally, our long term care, payout
annuity and life settlement contract business lines experienced favorable results in 2008.
Net investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 included trading portfolio losses
of $76 million, which were substantially offset by a corresponding decrease in the policyholders
funds reserves supported by the trading portfolio. The trading portfolio supported the indexed
group annuity portion of our pension deposit business which was exited during 2008. That business
had a net loss of $5 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2008. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion
of net investment income and net realized investment results.
47
CORPORATE & OTHER NON-CORE
The following table summarizes the results of operations for the Corporate & Other Non-Core
segment, including Asbestos and Environmental Pollution (A&E) and intrasegment eliminations.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net investment income |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
Net operating income (loss) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Net realized investment losses, after-tax |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Net loss attributable to CNAF |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Revenues decreased $63 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the same
period in 2008. Revenues were unfavorably impacted by lower net investment income and higher net
realized investment losses. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net
investment income and net realized investment results.
Net results decreased $37 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the
same period in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to decreased revenues as discussed above.
There was $1 million of unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve
development and $1 million of favorable premium development, resulting in no net prior year
development recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Unfavorable net prior year
development of $4 million was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2008, reflecting $5
million of unfavorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development and $1
million of favorable premium development.
The following table summarizes the gross and net carried reserves as of March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008 for Corporate & Other Non-Core.
Gross and Net Carried
Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Gross Case Reserves |
|
$ |
1,727 |
|
|
$ |
1,823 |
|
Gross IBNR Reserves |
|
|
2,476 |
|
|
|
2,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves |
|
$ |
4,203 |
|
|
$ |
4,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Case Reserves |
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
|
$ |
1,126 |
|
Net IBNR Reserves |
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves |
|
$ |
2,575 |
|
|
$ |
2,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A&E Reserves
Our property and casualty insurance subsidiaries have actual and potential exposures related to
asbestos and environmental pollution (A&E) claims. Further information on A&E claim and claim
adjustment expense reserves and net prior year development is included in Note G of the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1.
Asbestos
We have resolved a number of our large asbestos accounts by negotiating settlement agreements.
Structured settlement agreements provide for payments over multiple years as set forth in each
individual agreement.
48
In 1985, 47 asbestos producers and their insurers, including The Continental Insurance Company
(CIC), executed the Wellington Agreement. The agreement was intended to resolve all issues and
litigation related to coverage for asbestos exposures. Under this agreement, signatory insurers
committed scheduled policy limits and made the limits available to pay asbestos claims based upon
coverage blocks designated by the policyholders in 1985, subject to extension by policyholders.
CIC was a signatory insurer to the Wellington Agreement.
We have also used coverage in place agreements to resolve large asbestos exposures. Coverage in
place agreements are typically agreements with our policyholders identifying the policies and the
terms for payment of asbestos related liabilities. Claim payments are contingent on presentation
of documentation supporting the demand for claim payment. Coverage in place agreements may have
annual payment caps. Coverage in place agreements are evaluated based on claim filing trends and
severities.
We categorize active asbestos accounts as large or small accounts. We define a large account as an
active account with more than $100 thousand of cumulative paid losses. We have made resolving
large accounts a significant management priority. Small accounts are defined as active accounts
with $100 thousand or less of cumulative paid losses. Approximately 80% and 81% of our total
active asbestos accounts are classified as small accounts at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
We also evaluate our asbestos liabilities arising from our assumed reinsurance business and our
participation in various pools, including Excess & Casualty Reinsurance Association (ECRA).
We carry unassigned IBNR reserves for asbestos. These reserves relate to potential development on
accounts that have not settled and potential future claims from unidentified policyholders.
The tables below depict our overall pending asbestos accounts and associated reserves at March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008.
Pending Asbestos Accounts and Associated Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Paid Losses |
|
|
Net Asbestos |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
in 2009 |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Asbestos |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Policyholders |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Net Reserves |
|
Policyholders with settlement agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured settlements |
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Wellington |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Coverage in place |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total with settlement agreements |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholders with active accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large asbestos accounts |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Small asbestos accounts |
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholders |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed reinsurance and pools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Unassigned IBNR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
Pending Asbestos Accounts and Associated Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Paid Losses |
|
|
Net Asbestos |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
in 2008 |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Asbestos |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Policyholders |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Net Reserves |
|
Policyholders with settlement agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured settlements |
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Wellington |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Coverage in place |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total with settlement agreements |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholders with active accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large asbestos accounts |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Small asbestos accounts |
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholders |
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed reinsurance and pools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Unassigned IBNR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
1,202 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some asbestos-related defendants have asserted that their insurance policies are not subject to
aggregate limits on coverage. We have such claims from a number of insureds. Some of these claims
involve insureds facing exhaustion of products liability aggregate limits in their policies, who
have asserted that their asbestos-related claims fall within so-called non-products liability
coverage contained within their policies rather than products liability coverage, and that the
claimed non-products coverage is not subject to any aggregate limit. It is difficult to predict
the ultimate size of any of the claims for coverage purportedly not subject to aggregate limits or
predict to what extent, if any, the attempts to assert non-products claims outside the products
liability aggregate will succeed. Our policies also contain other limits applicable to these
claims and we have additional coverage defenses to certain claims. We have attempted to manage our
asbestos exposure by aggressively seeking to settle claims on acceptable terms. There can be no
assurance that any of these settlement efforts will be successful, or that any such claims can be
settled on terms acceptable to us. Where we cannot settle a claim on acceptable terms, we
aggressively litigate the claim. However, adverse developments with respect to such matters could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and/or equity.
We are involved in significant asbestos-related claim litigation, which is described in Note G of
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1.
Environmental Pollution
We classify our environmental pollution accounts into several categories, which include structured
settlements, coverage in place agreements and active accounts. Structured settlement agreements
provide for payments over multiple years as set forth in each individual agreement.
We have also used coverage in place agreements to resolve pollution exposures. Coverage in place
agreements are typically agreements with our policyholders identifying the policies and the terms
for payment of pollution related liabilities. Claim payments are contingent on presentation of
adequate documentation of damages during the policy periods and other documentation supporting the
demand for claim payment. Coverage in place agreements may have annual payment caps.
We categorize active accounts as large or small accounts in the pollution area. We define a large
account as an active account with more than $100 thousand cumulative paid losses. We have made
closing large accounts a significant management priority. Small accounts are defined as active
accounts with $100 thousand or less of cumulative paid losses. Approximately 73% of our total
active pollution accounts are classified as small
accounts as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
50
We also evaluate our environmental pollution exposures arising from our assumed reinsurance and our
participation in various pools, including ECRA.
We carry unassigned IBNR reserves for environmental pollution. These reserves relate to potential
development on accounts that have not settled and potential future claims from unidentified
policyholders.
The tables below depict our overall pending environmental pollution accounts and associated
reserves at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Pending Environmental Pollution Accounts and Associated Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Paid |
|
|
Pollution |
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Losses in 2009 |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Pollution Net |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Policyholders |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Reserve |
|
Policyholders with settlement agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured settlements |
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Coverage in place |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total with settlement agreements |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholders with active accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large pollution accounts |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Small pollution accounts |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholders |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed reinsurance and pools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Unassigned IBNR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
456 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pending Environmental Pollution Accounts and Associated Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Paid Losses |
|
|
Pollution |
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
in 2008 |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Pollution Net |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Policyholders |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Reserve |
|
Policyholders with settlement agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured settlements |
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Coverage in place |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total with settlement agreements |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policyholders with active accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large pollution accounts |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Small pollution accounts |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other policyholders |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed reinsurance and pools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Unassigned IBNR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
468 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
INVESTMENTS
We maintain a large portfolio of fixed income and equity securities, including large amounts of
corporate and government issued debt securities, collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs),
asset-backed and other structured securities, equity and equity-based securities and investments in
limited partnerships which pursue a variety of long and short investment strategies across a broad
array of asset classes. Our investment portfolio supports our obligation to pay future insurance
claims and provides investment returns which are an important part of our overall profitability.
For more than a year, capital and credit markets have experienced severe levels of volatility,
illiquidity, uncertainty and overall disruption. This market disruption generally continued into
the first quarter of 2009. While the government has initiated programs intended to stabilize and
improve markets and the economy, the impact of these programs remains uncertain. Certain sectors
of the financial markets began to show signs of improvement during the first quarter of 2009 while
other sectors continued to lag. As a result, we incurred realized losses in our investment
portfolio, primarily driven by continuing credit issues attributable to the asset-backed and
financial sectors, which have adversely impacted our results of operations.
Net Investment Income
The significant components of net investment income are presented in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
475 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Limited partnerships |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Trading portfolio (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross investment income |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
Investment expense |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
420 |
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The change in net unrealized losses on trading securities included in net investment
income was $13 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. As of March 31, 2009,
we no longer had a trading portfolio. |
Net investment income for the first quarter of 2009 decreased $14 million as compared with the same
period in 2008. Excluding trading portfolio losses of $77 million in 2008, net investment income
declined $91 million. This decrease was primarily driven by a decline in interest rates and higher
losses from limited partnerships. Limited partnerships generally present greater volatility,
higher illiquidity, and greater risk than fixed income investments. The trading portfolio losses
were related to our indexed group annuity business and were substantially offset by a corresponding
decrease in the policyholders funds reserves supported by the trading portfolio, which was
included in Insurance claims and policyholders benefits on the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations. We exited the indexed group annuity business in 2008.
The bond segment of the fixed maturity investment portfolio provided an income yield of 5.1% and
5.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
52
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
The components of net realized investment results for available-for-sale securities are presented
in the following table.
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Fixed maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of government agencies |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
32 |
|
Corporate and other taxable bonds |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
States, municipalities and political subdivisions tax-exempt securities |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Derivative securities |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
Short term investments |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment losses, net of participating policyholders interests |
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Realized investment losses, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses attributable to CNAF |
|
$ |
(344 |
) |
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses increased by $311 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared with the same period in 2008. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in
other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses. Further information on our OTTI losses and
impairment decision process is set forth in Note D of the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included under Item 1.
The following table provides details of the largest realized investment losses from sales of
securities aggregated by issuer including the fair value of the securities at date of sale, the
amount of the loss recorded and the period of time that the securities had been in an unrealized
loss position prior to sale. The period of time that the securities had been in an unrealized loss
position prior to sale can vary due to the timing of individual security purchases. Also included
is a narrative providing the industry sector along with the facts and circumstances giving rise to
the loss.
Largest Realized Investment Losses from Securities Sold at a Loss
Three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months in |
|
|
|
Value at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Date of |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Loss Prior |
|
Issuer Description and Discussion |
|
Sale |
|
|
On Sale |
|
|
To Sale (a) |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various notes and bonds issued by the United States Treasury.
Securities sold due to outlook on interest rates. |
|
$ |
2,870 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
0-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities of a provider of wireless and wire line
communication products. Economic conditions have caused a
weakness in sales which have resulted in cash flow issues
causing additional financial deterioration. |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
0-12+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,907 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the range of consecutive months the various positions were in an
unrealized loss prior to sale. 0-12+ means certain positions were less than 12 months,
while others were greater than 12 months. |
53
Gross Unrealized Losses
The following tables summarize the fair value and gross unrealized loss of fixed income investment
and non-investment grade securities categorized first by the length of time, as measured by the
first date those securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, and then further
categorized by the severity of the unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008.
Unrealized Loss Aging for Fixed Income Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value as a Percentage of Amortized Cost |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
(In millions) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
90-99% |
|
|
80-89% |
|
|
70-79% |
|
|
60-69% |
|
|
50-59% |
|
|
40-49% |
|
|
<40% |
|
|
Loss |
|
Investment grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months |
|
$ |
3,324 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
7-11 months |
|
|
5,313 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
12-24 months |
|
|
6,752 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
Greater than 24 months |
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
17,012 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
4,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
7-11 months |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
12-24 months |
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
Greater than 24 months |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-investment grade |
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
19,381 |
|
|
$ |
441 |
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
$ |
936 |
|
|
$ |
755 |
|
|
$ |
977 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
$ |
5,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
Unrealized Loss Aging for Fixed Income Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value as a Percentage of Amortized Cost |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
(In millions) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
90-99% |
|
|
80-89% |
|
|
70-79% |
|
|
60-69% |
|
|
50-59% |
|
|
40-49% |
|
|
<40% |
|
|
Loss |
|
Investment grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months |
|
$ |
6,749 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
681 |
|
7-11 months |
|
|
6,159 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
12-24 months |
|
|
3,549 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
1,803 |
|
Greater than 24 months |
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade |
|
|
18,235 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
7-11 months |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
12-24 months |
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
Greater than 24 months |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-investment grade |
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
20,552 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
947 |
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
$ |
1,133 |
|
|
$ |
941 |
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
$ |
702 |
|
|
$ |
5,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
The classification between investment grade and non-investment grade is based on a ratings
methodology that takes into account ratings from the three major providers, Standard & Poors (S&P),
Moodys Investor Services, Inc. (Moodys) and Fitch Ratings (Fitch) in that order of preference.
If a security is not rated by any of the three, we formulate an internal rating. For securities
with credit support from third party guarantees, the rating reflects the greater of the underlying
rating of the issuer or the insured rating.
Non-investment grade bonds, as presented in the tables above, are primarily high-yield securities
rated below BBB- by bond rating agencies, as well as other unrated securities that, according to
our analysis, are below investment grade. Non-investment grade securities generally involve a
greater degree of risk than investment grade securities.
As part of the ongoing OTTI monitoring process, we evaluated the facts and circumstances based on
available information for each of these securities and determined that the securities presented in
the above tables were temporarily impaired when evaluated as of March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008. This determination was based on a number of factors that we regularly consider including,
but not limited to: the issuers ability to meet current and future interest and principal
payments, an evaluation of the issuers financial condition and near term prospects, our assessment
of the sector outlook and estimates of the fair value of any underlying collateral. In all cases
where a decline in value is judged to be temporary, we have the intent and ability to hold these
securities for a period of time sufficient to recover the amortized cost of our investment through
an anticipated recovery in the fair value of such securities or by holding the securities to
maturity. In many cases, the securities held are matched to liabilities as part of ongoing
asset/liability duration management. As such, we continually assess our ability to hold securities
for a time sufficient to recover any temporary loss in value or until maturity. We believe we have
sufficient levels of liquidity so as to not impact the asset/liability management process. Further
information on our unrealized losses by asset class and our considerations in determining that the
securities were temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009 is included in Note D of the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1.
Our fixed income portfolio consists primarily of high quality bonds, 90% and 91% of which were
rated as investment grade (rated BBB- or higher) at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The
following table summarizes the ratings of our fixed income bond portfolio at carrying value.
Fixed Income Bond Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
% |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
% |
|
U.S. Government and affiliated agency securities |
|
$ |
1,124 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
2,993 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Other AAA rated |
|
|
9,698 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
10,112 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
AA and A rated |
|
|
9,366 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
8,166 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
BBB rated |
|
|
5,348 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Non-investment grade |
|
|
2,873 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
28,409 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
28,840 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, approximately 97% of the portfolio was issued by U.S.
Government and affiliated agencies or was rated by S&P or Moodys. The remaining bonds were rated
by other rating agencies or internally.
The carrying value of securities that are either subject to trading restrictions or trade in
illiquid private placement markets at March 31, 2009 was $346 million, which represents 1.0% of our
total investment portfolio. These securities were in a net unrealized gain position of $173
million at March 31, 2009.
56
The following table provides the composition of fixed maturity securities available-for-sale in a
gross unrealized loss position at March 31, 2009 by maturity profile. Securities not due at a
single date are allocated based on weighted average life.
Maturity Profile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duration
A primary objective in the management of the fixed maturity and equity portfolios is to optimize
return relative to underlying liabilities and respective liquidity needs. Our views on the current
interest rate environment, tax regulations, asset class valuations, specific security issuer and
broader industry segment conditions, and the domestic and global economic conditions, are some of
the factors that enter into an investment decision. We also continually monitor exposure to
issuers of securities held and broader industry sector exposures and may from time to time adjust
such exposures based on our views of a specific issuer or industry sector.
A further consideration in the management of the investment portfolio is the characteristics of the
underlying liabilities and the ability to align the duration of the portfolio to those liabilities
to meet future liquidity needs, minimize interest rate risk and maintain a level of income
sufficient to support the underlying insurance liabilities. For portfolios where future liability
cash flows are determinable and typically long term in nature, we segregate investments for
asset/liability management purposes.
The segregated investments support liabilities primarily in the Life & Group Non-Core segment
including annuities, structured benefit settlements and long term care products. The remaining
investments are managed to support the Standard Lines, Specialty Lines and Corporate & Other
Non-Core segments.
The effective durations of fixed income securities, short term investments, preferred stocks and
interest rate derivatives are presented in the table below. Short term investments are net of
securities lending collateral and account payable and receivable amounts for securities purchased
and sold, but not yet settled.
Effective Durations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Duration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Duration |
|
(In millions) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(In years) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(In years) |
|
Segregated investments |
|
$ |
8,072 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
8,168 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest sensitive investments |
|
|
25,428 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
25,194 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,500 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
33,362 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investment portfolio is periodically analyzed for changes in duration and related price change
risk. Additionally, we periodically review the sensitivity of the portfolio to the level of
foreign exchange rates and other factors that contribute to market price changes. A summary of
these risks and specific analysis on changes is included in the Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk in Item 7A of our Form 10-K.
57
Asset-Backed Mortgage Exposure
Asset-Backed Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Percent |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Security Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
|
of Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
MBS(a) |
|
|
CMO(b) |
|
|
ABS(c) |
|
|
CDO(d) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Security Type |
|
|
Investments |
|
U.S. Government Agencies |
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
$ |
1,190 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,692 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
AAA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,764 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,185 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
AA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
BBB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Non-investment grade and equity
tranches |
|
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
$ |
4,822 |
|
|
$ |
1,936 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
7,287 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amortized Cost |
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
$ |
5,772 |
|
|
$ |
2,693 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
9,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-prime (included above) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
922 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
923 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Amortized Cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,313 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A (included above) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
854 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
856 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Amortized Cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,101 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
1,107 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) |
|
(b) |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMO) |
|
(c) |
|
Asset-backed securities (ABS) |
|
(d) |
|
Collateralized debt obligations (CDO) |
Included in our fixed maturity securities at March 31, 2009 were $7,287 million of asset-backed
securities, at fair value, which represented 21% of total invested assets. Of the total
asset-backed securities, 81% were U.S. Government Agency issued or AAA rated. Of the total
invested assets, $923 million or 3% have exposure to sub-prime residential mortgage (sub-prime)
collateral, while $856 million or 2% have exposure to Alternative A residential mortgages that have
lower than normal standards of loan documentation (Alt-A) collateral, as measured by the original
deal structure. Of the securities with sub-prime exposure, approximately 93% were rated investment
grade, while 79% of the Alt-A securities were rated investment grade. We believe that each of
these securities would be rated investment grade even without the benefit of any applicable
third-party guarantees. In addition to sub-prime exposure in fixed maturity securities, there is
exposure of approximately $30 million through limited partnerships and sold credit default swaps
which provide the buyer protection against declines in sub-prime indices.
Included in the table above within the ABS and CDO security types are commercial mortgage-backed
securities (CMBS), which had an aggregate fair value of $627 million and an aggregate amortized
cost of $1,062 million at March 31, 2009. Of these holdings, 82% are rated AAA and 99% are rated
investment grade. Most of our CMBS holdings are in the form of senior tranches of securitization,
which benefit from significant credit support from subordinated tranches.
All asset-backed securities in an unrealized loss position are reviewed as part of the ongoing OTTI
process, which resulted in OTTI losses of $127 million after-tax for the three months ended March
31, 2009. Included in this OTTI loss was $107 million after-tax related to securities with
sub-prime and Alt-A exposure. These losses were primarily attributable to adverse changes in the
experience of certain underlying collateral and the resulting future expected default and recovery
assumptions in the cash flow models. Our review of these securities includes an analysis of cash
flow modeling under various default scenarios, the seniority of the specific tranche within the
deal structure, the composition of the collateral and the actual default experience. Given current
market conditions and the specific facts and circumstances related to our individual sub-prime,
Alt-A and CMBS exposures, we believe that all remaining unrealized losses are temporary in nature.
Continued deterioration in these markets beyond our current expectations may cause us to reconsider
and record additional OTTI losses. See Note D of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
included under Item 1 for additional information related to unrealized losses on asset-backed
securities.
58
Short Term Investments
The carrying value of the components of the short term investment portfolio is presented in the
following table.
Short Term Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Short term investments available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
1,164 |
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
2,516 |
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
Money market funds |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
Other, including collateral held related to securities lending |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short term investments |
|
$ |
4,583 |
|
|
$ |
3,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of cash collateral held related to securities lending, included in other
short term investments, was $41 million at March 31, 2009. There was no cash collateral held at
December 31, 2008.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
Our principal operating cash flow sources are premiums and investment income from our insurance
subsidiaries. Our primary operating cash flow uses are payments for claims, policy benefits and
operating expenses.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, net cash provided by operating activities was $187
million as compared with $303 million for the same period in 2008. Cash provided by operating
activities was unfavorably impacted by decreased investment income and decreased premium
collections in the first quarter of 2009 as compared with the same period in 2008.
Cash flows from investing activities include the purchase and sale of available-for-sale financial
instruments. Additionally, cash flows from investing activities may include the purchase and sale
of businesses, land, buildings, equipment and other assets not generally held for resale.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, net cash used by investing activities was $150 million
as compared with $11 million provided by investing activities for the same period in 2008. Cash
flows used by investing activities related principally to purchases of fixed maturity securities
and short term investments. The cash flow from investing activities is impacted by various factors
such as the anticipated payment of claims, financing activity, asset/liability management and
individual security buy and sell decisions made in the normal course of portfolio management.
Cash flows from financing activities include proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity
securities, outflows for dividends or repayment of debt, outlays to reacquire equity instruments,
and deposits and withdrawals related to investment contract products issued by us.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, net cash used by financing activities was $26 million as
compared with $273 million for the same period in 2008. Net cash used by financing activities in
2009 was primarily related to the payment of dividends on the 2008 Senior Preferred stock to Loews
Corporation.
59
Liquidity
We believe that our present cash flows from operations, investing activities and financing
activities are sufficient to fund our working capital and debt obligation needs and we do not
expect this to change in the near term due to the following factors:
|
|
|
We do not anticipate changes in our core property and casualty commercial insurance
operations which would significantly impact liquidity and we continue to maintain
reinsurance contracts which limit the impact of potential catastrophic events. |
|
|
|
|
We have entered into several settlement agreements and assumed reinsurance contracts
that require collateralization of future payment obligations and assumed reserves if our
ratings or other specific criteria fall below certain thresholds. The ratings triggers
are generally more than one level below our current ratings. A downgrade below our
current ratings levels would also result in additional collateral requirements for
derivative contracts for which we are in a liability position at any given point in time.
The maximum potential collateralization requirements are approximately $90 million. |
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009, our holding company held short term investments of $504 million.
Our holding companys ability to meet its debt service and other obligations is
significantly dependent on receipt of dividends from our subsidiaries. The payment of
dividends to us by our insurance subsidiaries without prior approval of the insurance
department of each subsidiarys domiciliary jurisdiction is limited by formula.
Notwithstanding this limitation, we believe that our holding company has sufficient
liquidity to fund our preferred stock dividend and debt service payments in 2009. |
We have an effective shelf registration statement under which we may issue $2.0 billion of debt or
equity securities.
Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of accounting pronouncements that have been adopted or recently issued
pronouncements that will be adopted in the future, see Note B of the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included under Item 1.
60
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains a number of forward-looking statements which relate to anticipated future
events rather than actual present conditions or historical events. These statements are made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and
generally include words such as believes, expects, intends, anticipates, estimates, and
similar expressions. Forward-looking statements in this report include any and all statements
regarding expected developments in our insurance business, including losses and loss reserves for
asbestos and environmental pollution and other mass tort claims which are more uncertain, and
therefore more difficult to estimate than loss reserves respecting traditional property and
casualty exposures; the impact of routine ongoing insurance reserve reviews we are conducting; our
expectations concerning our revenues, earnings, expenses and investment activities; expected cost
savings and other results from our expense reduction activities; and our proposed actions in
response to trends in our business. Forward-looking statements, by their nature, are subject to a
variety of inherent risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from the results projected in the forward-looking statement. We cannot control many of these risks
and uncertainties. Some examples of these risks and uncertainties are:
|
|
conditions in the capital and credit markets including severe levels of volatility,
illiquidity, uncertainty and overall disruption, as well as sharply reduced economic activity,
that may impact the returns, types, liquidity and valuation of our investments; |
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions, including recessionary conditions that may
decrease the size and number of our insurance customers and create higher exposures to our
lines of business, especially those that provide management and professional liability
insurance, as well as surety bonds, to businesses engaged in real estate, financial services
and professional services, and inflationary pressures on medical care costs, construction
costs and other economic sectors that increase the severity of claims; |
|
|
|
the effects of the mergers and failures of a number of prominent financial institutions and
government sponsored entities, as well as the effects of accounting and financial reporting
scandals and other major failures in internal controls and governance, on capital and credit
markets, as well as on the markets for directors and officers and errors and omissions
coverages; |
|
|
|
changes in foreign or domestic political, social and economic conditions; |
|
|
|
regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental regulations, judicial decisions,
including interpretation of policy provisions, decisions regarding coverage and theories of
liability, trends in litigation and the outcome of any litigation involving us, and rulings
and changes in tax laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
regulatory limitations, impositions and restrictions upon us, including the effects of
assessments and other surcharges for guaranty funds and second-injury funds, other mandatory
pooling arrangements and future assessments levied on insurance companies and other financial
industry participants under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 recoupment
provisions; |
|
|
|
the impact of competitive products, policies and pricing and the competitive environment in
which we operate, including changes in our book of business; |
|
|
|
product and policy availability and demand and market responses, including the level of
ability to obtain rate increases and decline or non-renew under priced accounts, to achieve
premium targets and profitability and to realize growth and retention estimates; |
|
|
|
development of claims and the impact on loss reserves, including changes in claim
settlement policies; |
|
|
|
the effectiveness of current initiatives by claims management to reduce loss and expense
ratios through more efficacious claims handling techniques; |
|
|
|
the performance of reinsurance companies under reinsurance contracts with us; |
|
|
|
conditions in the capital and credit markets that may limit our ability to raise
significant amounts of capital on favorable terms, as well as restrictions on the ability or
willingness of Loews Corporation to provide additional capital support to us; |
61
|
|
weather and other natural physical events, including the severity and frequency of storms,
hail, snowfall and other winter conditions, natural disasters such as hurricanes and
earthquakes, as well as climate change, including effects on weather patterns, greenhouse
gases, sea, land and air temperatures, sea levels, rain and snow; |
|
|
|
regulatory requirements imposed by coastal state regulators in the wake of hurricanes or
other natural disasters, including limitations on the ability to exit markets or to non-renew,
cancel or change terms and conditions in policies, as well as mandatory assessments to fund
any shortfalls arising from the inability of quasi-governmental insurers to pay claims; |
|
|
|
man-made disasters, including the possible occurrence of terrorist attacks and the effect
of the absence or insufficiency of applicable terrorism legislation on coverages; |
|
|
|
the unpredictability of the nature, targets, severity or frequency of potential terrorist
events, as well as the uncertainty as to our ability to contain our terrorism exposure
effectively, notwithstanding the extension through December 31, 2014 of the Terrorism Risk
Insurance Act of 2002; |
|
|
|
the occurrence of epidemics; |
|
|
|
exposure to liabilities due to claims made by insureds and others relating to asbestos
remediation and health-based asbestos impairments, as well as exposure to liabilities for
environmental pollution, construction defect claims and exposure to liabilities due to claims
made by insureds and others relating to lead-based paint and other mass torts; |
|
|
|
the sufficiency of our loss reserves and the possibility of future increases in reserves; |
|
|
|
regulatory limitations and restrictions, including limitations upon our ability to receive
dividends from our insurance subsidiaries imposed by state regulatory agencies and minimum
risk-based capital standards established by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners; |
|
|
|
the risks and uncertainties associated with our loss reserves as outlined in the Critical
Accounting Estimates and the Reserves Estimates and Uncertainties sections of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K; |
|
|
|
the possibility of changes in our ratings by ratings agencies, including the inability to
access certain markets or distribution channels and the required collateralization of future
payment obligations as a result of such changes, and changes in rating agency policies and
practices; and |
|
|
|
the actual closing of contemplated transactions and agreements. |
Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and we do not
undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of the statement, even if our expectations or any related events or
circumstances change.
62
CNA
Financial Corporation
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There were no material changes in our market risk components for the three months ended March 31,
2009. See the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk included in Item 7A of
our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31,
2008 for further information. Additional information related to portfolio duration and market
conditions is discussed in the Investments section of the Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Part I, Item 2.
63
CNA
Financial Corporation
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures which are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits
to the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), including this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a
timely basis. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required
disclosure.
As of March 31, 2009, the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
64
CNA
Financial Corporation
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Information on our legal proceedings is set forth in Notes G and H of the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1.
65
CNA Financial Corporation
Part II. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
Exhibit Number |
Employment Agreement, dated May 22, 2008, by and between CNA Financial Corporation
and Thomas F. Motamed
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated April 7, 2008, by and between Continental Casualty
Company and Larry A. Haefner
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
66
CNA Financial Corporation
Part II. Other Information
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNA Financial Corporation |
|
|
Dated: May 4, 2009
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ D. Craig Mense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Craig Mense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
67